Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-02-22 Committee of the Whole MinutesTukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Meeting City Hall Council Chambers February 22, 2016 — 7:00 P.M. MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council President Duffie called the Tukwila City Council meeting to order at 7:01 p.m Councilmember Seal led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. OFFICIALS Present were Joe Duffie, Council President; Councilmembers Dennis Robertson, Verna Seal, Kathy Hougardy, De'Sean Quinn, Kate Kruller, Thomas McLeod. CITY OFFICIALS Allan Ekberg, Mayor; David Cline, City Administrator; Bruce Linton, Deputy Police Chief; Chris Flores, Interim Fire Chief; Nora Gierloff, Community Development Deputy Director; Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor; Stephanie Brown, Human Resources Director; Kim Gilman, Human Resources Analyst; Peggy McCarthy, Finance Director; Vicky Carlsen, Finance Deputy Director; Moira Bradshaw, RFA Project Manager; Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst; Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk. CITIZEN COMMENTS Pam Carter, 4115 South 139th Street, stated she is present as Co -Chair of the Tukwila International Boulevard Action Committee (TIBAC), and will be providing an overview of the TIBAC activities from 2015. She updated the Council on several different topics of discussion TIBAC had throughout the previous year and the various presentations by City staff and outside agencies. The discussion also included TIBAC's support for enhanced code enforcement efforts within the City, and she previewed the 2016 TIBAC work plan. She announced TIBAC meets the second Tuesday of every month, and the last Saturday of each month is trash collection day along TIB. The next trash collection event will be on Saturday, February 27, 2016, beginning at 9:00 a.m. and members of the Foster High School Chapter of the Future Business Leaders of America will be participating in this event as a fundraising effort. Lionel De La Torre, 13843 37th Avenue South, stated he is the President of the Foster Chapter of the Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA), and he is present this evening to ask for assistance with a fundraising effort. The FBLA is a non - profit organization that prepares students for work in business and commerce through job stimulation, workshops, exhibits, and student based competitions. The FBLA is raising money to send six members to the 2016 FBLA regional competition in Spokane. Daniela Bailon, 13873 38th Avenue South, stated she is a member of the Foster Chapter of the FBLA. Their group was offered a donation of $15.00 an hour for anyone who volunteers on behalf of the Foster Chapter of the FBLA at the TIBAC trash collection day. Interested community members are asked to meet at 9:00 a.m. at the Church by the Side of the Road on Saturday, February 27, 2016. PUBLIC HEARING Final subdivision approval for Phase 1 of the Osterly Park Townhomes (3421 S. 144th Street). Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk, announced this is a quasi - judicial matter, with the City Council acting as the decision -maker based on the information and record presented at this meeting, similar to the processed used by a hearing examiner or judge. Quasi - judicial matters do not follow the standard Council agenda process of Council Committee, Committee of the Whole and Regular Meeting. The Council is being asked to conduct the public hearing this evening as part of the Final subdivision approval for Phase 1 of the Osterly Park Townhomes. Part of the quasi - judicial process involves Appearance of Fairness questions to be asked of each Councilmember. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 2 of 9 Ms. Hart explained that City staff and the applicant will be providing information on the project, and the public will be given an opportunity to provide comments. She asked the Councilmembers to make note of their questions, which can be asked during the public hearing after the speakers have finished their presentations. 7:15 p.m. Council President Duffie opened the public hearing. Ms. Hart stated that testimony at a quasi - judicial hearing is taken under oath. She asked those in attendance in the audience who are planning to testify to raise their right hand and then asked, "Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth ?" Those wishing to testify responded in the affirmative. Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor, and Mike Overbeck, Project Developer, also answered in the affirmative. The Deputy City Clerk asked the following Appearance of Fairness questions of each of the 7 Councilmembers: 1. Do you or your family have any interest in the subject property located at 3421 S. 144th Street in Tukwila? 2. Do you stand to gain or lose by your decision on this matter? 3. Have you had any ex -parte communications regarding this application? Each of the 7 Councilmembers answered "No" to all of the above questions The Deputy City Clerk then asked, "Does anyone in the audience object to any of the Councilmembers presiding over this matter ?" There were no objections from the audience. Council President Duffie asked for a staff report on the final subdivision for Phase 1 of the Osterly Park Townhomes. Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor, reviewed the history of the Osterly Park Townhomes project, and utilized a PowerPoint presentation to update the Council. Highlights of the presentation included: PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • Review Process • Background Information — Site and Project • Preliminary Plat Approval by Board of Architectural Review • Final Plat Approval by City Council WHAT IS A TOWNHOUSE? • Ordinance No. 2199 was adopted in March 2008 allowing development of zero lot line and fee simple townhomes in Medium Density Residential (MDR) and High Density Residential (HDR) zoning districts. A townhome is a type of residential development in which individual dwelling units are attached along at least one common wall to at least one other dwelling unit REVIEW PROCESS • Townhouse development is allowed within the MDR and HDR zoning districts • Multifamily structures over 1,500 square feet require Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approval (Townhouse Design Manual) • The preliminary plat and design review hearings are combined. Board of Architectural Review decision issued. REVIEW PROCESS - SUBDIVISION • Preliminary Plat approval granted by Planning Commission for subdivisions of more than 10 lots or unit lots. o After Preliminary Plat approval, developer applies for Public Works permit to install utilities and access Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 3 of 9 • Final Plat approval granted by the City Council and recorded with King County after all conditions of the Preliminary Plat have been completed • After Final Plat approval, the developer applies for building permits to construct townhomes • The subdivider may develop and record the subdivision in phases. 0 PROJECT LOCATION • Cascade View Neighborhood • Zoning: High- Density Residential PHASE 1 • 9 Lots with 8 Unit lots. • Tract A — Access and Utilities • Tract B — Phase I Recreation Area • Easements • Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions include requirements for the maintenance of the development's common areas. FINAL PLAT FOR PHASE 1 The proposed final plat meets established requirements in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) for final plats. The requirements and criteria are listed at TMC Section 17.14.030 C, "Criteria for Final Plat ": • The proposed plat bears the required certificates and statements of approval. • A title insurance report furnished by the subdivider confirms the title of the land and the proposed subdivision is vested in the name of the owner(s) whose signature appears on the plat certificate. • Facilities and improvements required to be provided by the subdivider have been completed for Phase 1. Landscaping and other improvements that could be damaged due to construction of the townhomes shall be provided prior to final inspection of the building permits. • Land surveyor has signed the plat. • The plat is in conformance with the approved preliminary plat. • The plat meets the requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW and other applicable state and local laws which were in effect at the time of preliminary approval. Phasing: • The proposed plat complies with the phasing requirements identified in TMC Section 17.14.040, "Phasing ". STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Approval of the Final Subdivision application for Phase 1 of the Osterly Park Townhomes project. Council President Duffle called for public comments. Todd Smith came forward to speak. Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk, administered the oath as follows: "Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth ?" Mr. Smith answered in the affirmative. Mr. Smith inquired about the amount of permeable space allowed for this type of development. In viewing the project he noticed a lot of concrete surfaces. He stated the development design needs to have the north —south demarcation. He feels the development could benefit from solar energy, and the lack of directional demarcation and roof slope could hinder the installation of solar panels. Lastly, he commented that the address scheme of the project is incorrect. Sharon Mann came forward to speak. Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk, administered the oath as follows: "Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth ?" Ms. Mann answered in the affirmative. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 4 of 9 Ms. Mann voiced her support for the Osterly Park Townhomes project. She feels the project is the beginning step in redevelopment of the Tukwila International Boulevard area. The design of the townhomes fits within the vision of the area. Council President Duff ie asked the Council if they had questions of staff. Councilmember Hougardy stated she had some questions for City staff and the developer on this project. She asked the following questions: Who will have maintenance responsibilities for the development; would the City have any recourse if the development is not maintained; and how many parking spaces will be available for the development. Mike Overbeck stated the maintenance and upkeep of the finished development will be the responsibility of the individuals who purchase the townhomes and the future Homeowners Association to be established for the development. Regarding parking, each unit has a two -car garage. Two guest parking stalls have been created and additional parking will become available with the development of Phase 2. Ms. Dhaliwal explained that the development will be required to record the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, Easements and Agreements (CC &Rs) that lists the maintenance requirements and responsibilities for the access road, utilities, and landscaped areas. The Homeowners Association will be responsible to follow the CC &Rs. Any issues that arise relating to failure to maintain the development in accordance with the approved CC &Rs would be handled through the City's Code Enforcement process. Councilmember Kruller asked Mr. Overbeck if he has completed a development of this type before. Mr. Overbeck answered no. Ms. Kruller stated a question has been raised about adding solar panels to the units, and she asked Mr. Overbeck to address that question. She also inquired about the cost range for the townhomes, and why the parking for this phase was limited to accommodating only 10 vehicles. Mr. Overbeck stated they spent a great deal of time (and resources) undergrounding the utilities for the development, and he would need to research the option of adding solar panels to the units. Regarding the cost for the units, he believes the units would be in the $300,000 range, and stated that one unit is already under contract. Mr. Overbeck explained that the development is within walking distance of a transit hub. It is his hope that his development will continue the momentum of redevelopment of the Tukwila International Boulevard area. 7:47 p.m. Council President Duffie closed the public hearing. SPECIAL ISSUES a. Final subdivision approval for Phase 1 of the Osterly Park Townhomes. The applicant is requesting a final subdivision approval for Phase I of the Osterly Park Townhomes project. Phase 1 includes creation of nine lots, along with an access road and a recreation space tract. Final plat approval for Phase 1 would allow the applicant to construct and sell eight townhome unit lots. The Board of Architectural Review has previously approved the Preliminary Plat and Design Review for the proposed development. City staff recommends approval of the final plat for Phase 1. The Councilmembers expressed support for the project and thanked Mr. Overbeck for taking the chance on this type of project. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE SPECIAL MEETING LATER THIS EVENING. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 5 of 9 b. A resolution regarding non - represented employee compensation. Councilmember Seal indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on February 17, 2016. A majority of the committee members recommended approval. Stephanie Brown, Human Resources Director, explained staff is seeking approval of a resolution that would update the salary schedule for non - represented employees for 2016. Two of the benchmark positions were shown below market: B -23 and F -102. The draft resolution proposes a 1.5% increase for all non - represented positions to maintain internal equity with represented groups, and an increase to the F -102 band by 2.5% to bring it in alignment with the market. All adjustments would be retroactive to January 1, 2016. The Councilmembers exchanged comments and asked clarifying questions of staff on the above item to include: What the difference is between the current proposal and the one reviewed in December 2015; What positions are included in bands B -23 and F -102; and Acknowledgement that the proposal brought forward follows the City Council's established process. Ms. Brown explained that the current proposal adds a 1.5% across the board increase for all non - represented bands, is .5% higher than the proposal reviewed in December 2015. Band B -23 includes the Executive Assistant position and F -102 is the band for the City Administrator position. The current proposal does not correct the compression within specific bands and has caused a new line of regression. Staff has requested that the Finance and Safety Committee review and discuss Resolution No. 1796, which established the policy for non - represented compensation and benefits. Councilmember Kruller voiced her opposition to the proposed resolution relating to the non - represented employee increase, and intends to vote against the issue. Ms. Kruller supports Council review of the resolution in the third quarter. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE MARCH 14, 2016 SPECIAL MEETING. c. Annexation to the Kent Regional Fire Authority (RFA). Councilmember Seal indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on February 17, 2016. A majority of the committee members recommended approval. Councilmember Seal stated the purpose of the discussion this evening is for the Council to consider whether the City should move forward in the process to review and conduct public outreach on potential annexation into the Kent RFA. Ms. Seal stated this topic has been discussed at several Council Committee and City Council meetings that included presentations by staff. The Council has been provided a great deal of information on potential annexation into the RFA, and now is the time to decide whether the City should move forward with public outreach on potential annexation into the Kent RFA. Council President Duffie called for public comments on this agenda item. Kathleen Wilson, 4803 South 162nd Street, stated that voting not to annex into the Kent Regional Fire Authority does not relieve the City and residents of the obligations to the Tukwila Fire Department. Ms. Wilson stated the community has a duty to the firefighters to ensure they have the facilities and equipment needed so they can serve the people. Brennon Wilson, 4803 South 162nd Street, stated that doing nothing is not an option relating to the Tukwila Fire Department; some type of operational change needs to be done. He feels annexation into the Kent RFA would not benefit the City and the residents. He reviewed several scenarios relating to additional charges that would be billed to property owners. Some of the information that he has reviewed indicates that some property owners would be paying more than other residents based on perceived risk, strictly based on the property location within the City. Tukwila City Council Committee ofthe Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 6 of 9 Sharon Mann, 4452 South 1GOm Street, explained that et the beginning of the RFA process, she thought the City's annexation into the Kent RFA would bea good idea. However, the more information she reads about a Fire Authority, she now feels annexation into the Kent RFA is not a good idea for the City of Tukwila. In an RFA the residents do not have a vote or a voice, and she is not in favor of residents losing their vote. Ms. Mann has talked to residents/community members of the cities of SeaTac, Covington and Kent, and those she spoke with are not happy with the service provided by the Kent Regional Fire Authority. Councilmember Robertson stated he served on the Finance subcommittee, and he distributed a opr*adsheatbzthnCounoi|tit|ed"KontRegiono|FinaAuthority—Tuhwi|aSen/ineAnaaBonefitCharge Fonnu|e.^ Mr. Robertson specifically referred to the differences between Kent and Tukwila associated with two sections of the handout. Firet, the residential charge for Tukwila is 070 and for Kent, it is 0.80. The Fire Flow Factor is 0.4923064 for Tukwila and 0.31245 for Kent. Mr. Robertson explained the difference between the Fire Benefit Charge (FBC) assessed to Tukwila and to Kent property owners. There is a limitation that the total FBC (of the RFA as a whole) charged/collected not exceed 6096. Additionally, the FBC + the annual property tax collected = the RFA annual budget. Councilmember Hougardy stated she has several questions for staff relating to the governance of the RFA. She asked what time commitment would be required of the three Tukwila Counni|membemvvho would baon the RFABoard. Moira Bradshaw, RFA Project K4anoger. stated the Kent RFABoard meets twice a month on Wednesdays. The meetings begin at5:3Op.m.. and they are held ata Kent Fire Station. Councilmember Seal referred to the proposed timeline for RFA review on pages 187 and 188 of the agenda packet. Ms. Seal reviewed the key dates of the schedule that would require extensive Council review. Councilmember Kruller commented that the purpose of the City's research and review of the Kent RFA was to see if the RFA would bea good fit for Tukwila. The City would still need to address the facility issues. The main question to ask is if the RFA would benefit the City, and what would the City get from the annexation. Ms. Kruller asked if the City should continue to explore other options for the Tukwila Fire Department, and she voiced her support for going into the community to ask the residents how they can best beserved. Councilmember Seal clarified that the question before the Council this evening is if the RFA item should be forwarded to the March Committee of the Whole meeting for discussion and comments on the timeline (pages 187 and 188 of the agenda packet), and what would need to be completed in order to have the RFAitemon the November ballot. The City has spent the past three years working through the issue of potential annexation into the Kent RFA. Ms. Seal feels the time spent was the Council's ^due-di|iQence^ on the item. With the information the Council has been presented, is the Council ready to try and work through all the steps necessary to have this item placed on the November ballot? The NFACommittee members and the Tukwila firefighters deserve to know if the Council wants to continue down the road on the issue, or if it is time to stop researching/discussing the issue of a potential annexation into the Kent RFA. Councilmember McLeod stated he recently was given a tour of the City's fire stations and talked to members of the Tukwila Fire Department about a variety of topics, including the services currently provided to the City. Mr. McLeod stated ho supports providing the fire department with the resources they need todo the 'job. In his review of how the FBC charge is assessed, it was notable that the charge does not take into account the year ohome was built; the charge ie assessed on square feet. There 1sa different risk factor with an older home of one size versus a newer home of one size. Ho said the nature of work for fire departments has changed over the years, and now the department is responding to a lot of medical/aid calls. He feels another topic of discussion for the Council is the overall structure of the Tukwila Fire Department and how the community uses the fire department. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 7 of 9 Councilmember Quinn stated that when the City began the discussion of potential annexation into an RFA, it was perceived that the profession was moving toward Regional Fire Authorities. The City does not have a "do nothing" option; the Council has heard comments about structural issues with the facilities, as well as the overall operational and structure of the Fire Department. Based on the review and outreach schedule (listed on pages 187 and 188 of the agenda packet), Mr. Quinn does not feel the Council can meet the identified timeline. He explained that the Council needs to address the Facilities Plan and prepare the next biennial budget, in additional to a decision on the RFA. He voiced support for delaying the decision relating to the RFA. Councilmember Hougardy explained the Council was provided only two options: Yes, move forward with the annexation into the RFA, or No, to annexation into the RFA. She asked if there is a third option, such as a hybrid approach to contracting for some of the services provided by the Kent RFA, and keeping other services within the City. Ms. Hougardy asked what the pros and cons of that type of approach would be for the City. Ms. Bradshaw stated in order to develop a hybrid approach, the City would need to identify the issues that need to be fixed and /or changed and the goals of the changes. Councilmember McLeod stated he has spent the past month reviewing the information on this issue and asking questions. While speaking with the firefighters, it was apparent that the needs and call types are different now than in the past. He likes the idea of the City owning the fire stations and working on ways to see how the spaces could be used differently, such as including a space for the Tukwila Police Department to have a presence at the fire stations. Councilmember Robertson stated this is not the first time the City has researched the potential annexation into an RFA. Mr. Robertson provided the Council with a history on the RFA and an explanation on the Fire Benefit Charge and other issues that could arise from annexation into the Kent RFA. He explained that the proposed FBC charge would be higher in Tukwila than Kent, and the services provided would be the same as what the City is getting at this time. He noted that assessment of an FBC charge can be challenged in the courts. The two different FBC charges creates a legal and political issue, and annexation into the RFA would require three Councilmembers to commit additional time to another governing board. Until there is a better financing solution for a RFA, Mr. Robertson voiced his support for tabling the discussion. Council President Duffie reviewed the history of the Tukwila Fire Department, beginning with the "all volunteer" department from the 1960's. He feels the RFA could be a good idea. However, the City has not asked the residents their thoughts on a potential annexation into the Kent RFA. Mr. Duffie stated the discussion of the RFA should be tabled and not move forward. He feels the City should move toward strengthening Tukwila's fire department. Councilmember Hougardy stated the City has put a lot of work into the RFA, and she does not want to dispel the idea of an RFA. She asked what additional information Councilmembers need on this item. Based on the discussion this evening, she is open to the option of an RFA and other options. She feels the main question that should be asked is, "What additional information does the Council need in order to move forward with putting this issue on the November Ballot ?" Councilmember Seal stated that in listening to the discussion, she has heard that an RFA could be a good idea, just not at this time. There have also been comments about the structural and operational issues within the Fire Department that need to be addressed sooner rather than later. Ms. Seal explained the Plan B she has referenced in the past relates to facilities. The Council has made it clear that something has to be done. It appears that it is not the time to move forward with the RFA. Councilmember Robertson spoke in support of tabling the City's discussion on the RFA, and he does not support having community outreach on this item at this time. This is the second time the City has researched the idea of an RFA. The outreach will cost money and there are facility issues that need to be addressed. He feels the City needs to show discretion on spending if the Council is going to ask the citizens to vote on spending money on facilities in the near future. The Council and staff need time to address the other issues that have been identified. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 8 of 9 Councilmember Kruller stated that tabling the discussion on this issue does not mean a "do nothing" approach relating to the fire department. Essentially, the City had a solution for a problem and tried to make that solution fit. The City needs to identify what needs to be corrected; and develop a plan to correct the issues that are identified. Council President Duffie asked if it was the decision of the Council to table the issue of the RFA at this time. Councilmember Seal clarified that she feels the RFA issue should be set aside at this time. The discussion could resume sometime in the future. Councilmember Hougardy asked if staff would still provide answers to Council questions (included in the Council question and answer RFA matrix on pages 197 through 202 of the agenda packet). Councilmember Seal stated not at this time. At this time there are many other things (such as the Facilities Plan) that need to be discussed by the Council. She feels Councilmembers with questions should keep those in the RFA notebook, and if the RFA topic is brought forward again, those questions can be asked and addressed at that time. Councilmember McLeod inquired about how the Council could proceed and not lose momentum. The Council has a responsibility to make sure the items are addressed. Councilmember Seal stated she will be meeting with the Council Analyst about the Finance and Safety Committee work plan. The first item for discussion will be the Facilities Plan, including Fire. Other operational issues will also be included in the work plan. The Finance and Safety Committee will be moving forward with addressing the issues that have been identified. Mayor Ekberg voiced his support for the plan, laid out by Councilmember Seal. The Finance and Safety Committee has done an excellent job of discussing the item and bringing the item forward to allow the Council to come to the consensus that has been reached this evening. The goal of City Administration is to support the direction provided by the City Council. City Administration will begin to review the operational aspects of the Fire Department and the facility needs of the City as a whole, including fire apparatus and fire stations. They will work closely with the Finance and Safety Committee to make sure they have all the information needed to update the Council. Councilmember Seal reiterated that at this time, the City is putting the issue of the RFA aside, and the topic will not be forwarded to the next Regular Meeting. Council President Duffie confirmed (via head -nod) that there was Council consensus to set aside the City's discussion on the RFA. REPORTS a. Mayor Mayor Ekberg announced that as of today, February 22, 2016, the Traveler's Choice Motel has been demolished and he circulated a photograph of the demolition site. On February 20, 2016 he attended the 11th and 33rd Legislative Districts' Town Hall meeting. He recently met with Tukwila Historical Society representatives to discuss a new lease for the old City Hall building, and he attended the recent Tukwila Pool, Pool Floats and Floats event. Mayor Ekberg distributed a memorandum to the City Council that provided an update on his top three priorities: Speeding in residential neighborhoods, Enhanced Code Enforcement, and Complaints /Customer Service. The memorandum also included information on homelessness within the City, specifically addressing homeless encampments on City properties. City staff has completed an audit of the current locations of the encampments and that information, along with a suggested plan to address the issue, will be provided to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee in the near future. Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes February 22, 2016 Page 9 of 9 b. City Council Councilmember Robertson stated in January, he requested Council support for his attendance at the "Puget Sound Day on the Hill" event in Washington D.C. After careful consideration and further review of the delegation that plans to attend the event, he has decided against traveling to Washington D.C. for the event. Councilmember Seal reported on the recent Finance and Safety Committee discussion relating to the Police and Fire Department budgets, and copies of the materials from that meeting were distributed to all Councilmembers. Ms. Seal stated anyone with questions or concerns on the Police and Fire Department budgets should contact Finance Director Peggy McCarthy. Councilmember Hougardy announced there will be an open house and public meeting at the Valley View Sewer District Office (3460 South 148th Street, Tukwila) on February 25, 2016. The to for the meeting will be "The Loop and surrounding area sewer project." The open house begins at 6:00 and the public meeting will begin at 6:45 p.m. Councilmember Quinn attended the 11th and 33rd Legislative Districts' Town Hall meeting on February 20, 2016. Councilmember Kruller attended the Diversity and Inclusion Seminar on February 17, 2016. On February 19, 2016 she attended the community celebration and information event for the Tukwila School District bond projects. On February 20, 2016 she attended the 11th and 33rd Legislative Districts' Town Hall meeting. Councilmember McLeod attended the Sound Cities Association Networking, Dinner on February 17, 2016, where King County Executive Dow Constantine was the speaker. Mr. McLeod reviewed the topics discussed at the event. c. Staff There was no report. d. City Attorney The City Attorney's presence is not required at Committee of the Whole meetings. e. Intergovernmental There was no report. ADJOURNMENT 9:43 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT DUFFIE DECLARED THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING ADJOURNED TO CONVENE A SPECIAL MEETING. r oe Duffie, Council Pre .d . Melissa Hart, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT: 3/14/16 AVAILABLE ON THE CITY WEBSITE: 3/15116