The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSpecial 2016-03-22 Facilities Plan Workshop 1 - Powerpoint Presentation Shown at Meeting - Facilities Plan OverviewCity of Tukwila Facilities Overview Council Workshop March 22, 2016 fiff City of Tukwila Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study Phase 4 Steering Committee Recommendations liff Introduction Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Tonight's Presentation Process Refresher Phase 1 Refresher Phase 2 Refresher Phase 3 — Steering Committee Recommended Alternatives Phase 4 Steering Committee Recommended Funding and Phasing Community Outreach and Engagement What's next? 3 Process Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Phase One What are the facilities needs? ■ Identify current use • Estimate current space needs Project future space needs Phase Two How suitable are our current facilities? • Inventory existing facilities • Assess suitability for use ■ Assess condition All Staff Feedback Phase Three What's the best plan for Tukwila? ■ Identify alternatives (buy, build, lease) • Assess alternatives • Identify the preferred approach Community Outreach and Engagement Phase Four How do we get there? • Phasing and Funding Plan Staff Feedback 4 Phase 1 Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Space Needs EXISTING SPACE 2013 NEEDS 2040 NEEDS 144,044 sq. n. 205,237 sq. ft. 235,567 sq. ft. 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 5 Minkler Shop Phase 2 Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Assessment of Existing Facilities r— George Long a ® *i *L1 44mo Fire Stn #54 remodel City Hall <=I Unsuitable condition 1 maintain Golf Maint. TCC +9 Suitable condition l* 6 Phase 3 Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Steering Committee Recommended Alternatives Public Safety Building $25.9 M* Police & Courts combined in a new location. • 2019 move -in 44 City Shops Facility $26.6 M* Both current shops demolished and new shops combined on a new location p p , either concurrently with or after the Public Safety Building • 2019 move -in City Hall Campus $18.4 M 6300 to be demolished and City Hall expanded on current location after move -in to new Public Safety Building. 2022 move -in l0 00 0 N l0 CO 0 N l0 00 0 c-1 c--I N N N N N M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N *Does not include long -term expansions Phase 4 Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Steering Committee Recommended Funding and Financing Fund • with UTGO (voted) bonds and It with 63 -20 financing. Site Selection & Entitlements - & It Hold public vote for PASS Issue RFP for 1(` •• . • • Desi .• n & Build - MOVE IN 2020! #0- LEGEND 0 Council Decision Community Input Construction Phase Design & Permit - Build t MOVE IN 2022! IIi� ACCEPT Desi n & Build - MOVE IN 2020! 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 2021 2022 8 Phase 4 Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study STEERING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Recommended Community Outreach #0- Road Show TIBAC, COPCAB, Tukwila Rotary, Southcenter Rotary, Southwest King Chamber of Commerce, Tukwila Historical Society, Equity and Diversity Commission, Library Advisory Board, Arts Commission, Parks Commission and Sustain the Pool Other Draft Report and Summary on website Narrated video of Road Show on website and TukTV TukTV Tukwila, Your Community episode Reporter — City Pages E- Hazelnut Mailing Open Houses Meetings Social media Internal communications 9 City of Tukwila Facilities Overview Proposed Facilities Plan with Fire /4i "Plan B" b Facilities Steering Committee consensus that Fire facilities must be addressed 70- Council direction to investigate what the steering committee recommendations would look like with Fire included Preliminary review by Finance and Safety Committee lb Council set aside RFA deliberations Fire additions to Facilities Plan ■ Replace existing fire stations: $21.9M •Station 51 Station 52 Station 54 Fund equipment and apparatus: $21M 0- Pro.osed Facilities Plan Term Funding Mechanisms 2015 $ Near Term — 2017/2018 Biennium Public Safety: • New Justice Center — Police and Municipal Court • Fire facilities • Fire apparatus and equipment • Public Works Shops Public Safety bond ballot measure Steering Committee recommended 6320 financing for Shops — other options available $68.8 M for justice center, fire facilities and equipment $26.6 M for shops, utilities pay half Medium Term — 2019/2020 Biennium City Hall Campus Councilmanic bonding $18.4M Outside the Planning Range Police Precinct City Shops Addition CIP $8 M $6.5 M 13 Public Works Shops T1 Near Term Timeline Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Facilities Public Safety Building Fire Station 51 Fire Station 52 Fire Station 54 . 14 Considerations ► Plan specifically developed in stages and by biennium to match City budget cycles • Opportunity with the fall election ` Heightened awareness of fire facilities due to RFA process 70- City of Tukwila Facilities Overview Understanding our facilities needs /4i Phase 1 City of Tukwila Facilities Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study PHASE 3 WORKSESSION 4.0y 'v4, A growing population, aging facilities Tukwila Population Change Over Thne, 1910 - 2010 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 361 Fire Station 1154 Burp Long 5fiup Hull: 1961 453 424 521 ■ ▪ ▪ i ■ l ! ■ i • • • • • • 3,569 Fire Station #53 Buikt 1995 Cn row nity Center BuiiL" 1995 19,107 • • • • • • • • • • • 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 6 Public Works Shops Council Workshop March 22, 2016 Overview of Shops Minkler Shops • Built in 1972 • 35 staff • Houses: • Streets • Stormwater • Sewer • Traffic operations and signal shop • Equipment and material storage George Long Shop • Built in 1965 • 15 staff • Houses: • Fleet • Surplus furnishing and equipment storage • Evidence vehicles • Locksmith shop • Pre - auction vehicle storage When these facilities were constructed we weren't... • Subject to NPDES standards • Deploying 70 cameras throughout the city • Employing twice as many people • Providing assistance to first responders • Servicing 200 vehicles • Subject to OSHA standards • Serving 19,000 people at night and 150,000+ during the day Impacts to public service • Time loss • Material and equipment storage • Vehicle storage Impacts to employees • Inadequate restroom facilities • Lack of climate control • Not ergonomically designed • Lack of space • Inadequate ventilation -«rte * is , . 6,000,000, 000 5,000,000,000 4,000,0M,000 3,000,000,000 2,000,000,000 1,000,000,000 0 42 Year Comparison 1974 1975 1990 2015 .Assessed Value 1 City Budget 0 ► aa y #siir • ,■ ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •i• a_ }}3Vf11ii' .ti1 !fs irlf\ t11l f i/ liI rii■•.•i•.•••If/•I•s f • s If •i i ••• ill!tr1 i 11 i# #ti 4+iri•riiii i r4if•ri•lii•iii ii •i 4440001001449099690 «#t 64•••• 1••• I.•. 1•. 44 444 4•.•• •••••••••••••••••t•!rlf1r 4rr1•.•. 1 ••••••••.•.1.1••1••••frfrr•r••f rfrr 14. # i- 1106-6••••••rrrrr i4i•i4.•4•r4440•44044484••• 44 r i•• 4••• i i rr 41 i i • 0*4*S• 410.661666••••••••••••••04444 / 4 4 • 4 t s • • • • • . • fa t • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • •• i • i 11t•1 00+ 000sili•1•!rt•••f•••ff•••t•!1•••• 4!••f•••4f.••f•••••••••• *MAW. •0 11 0'# i / !,! • f 4 • f • • • 1 • • • • f • 1 • • . ! • • 4 • 4 1 • • • 1 • t • • 4 • • • • • r • • ! i • • r r • 1 0-67 ♦cif #f ► }i4ti4i iii +• +••1.••ifi• tits.• •••••fffff•4.4.4•f..•4r4.•••••4 •.6 \!••1.1••11. 44441• f••• l41f•414ff14.141.1••1••••lrFi 6 66-•!44 610:4044:. 4 i • i•!{ t i• i 1 i i•• i. f• 4 6 4 11 } 11 4 4 4•► 4 4• 4 4 4. f 4. 4.•• i 1 f• f• 14 / r•• 4 i a 4 i 6- �`i f* t j 4 f 14 f 4 1 4 4 4.•• 4 r s s i r s• 1. 11 4 t i i r f i f/ r• r f i 1••• 4••. 4. i 4 4 f f f 4* �'f� 4 64444. 44414 4. 44. t. 4• isri•44 rr •4.44.4•.44.4•.4f•41661.6•it_ff f i.• i f . f••• f 1• 4• t\ t 1 f 4 11. 4 4 t 4 4• i 1 i! 4. 4 f i.• 1 1•\ f f••! f a f 0 a f 6 00J•••••••••••••••••••••• • t . t • • ! . sow . 4 t •••••••••••••••0066,6 ' .I 6•r r i r r•• r s•••.• s• 4. s 1• s s s 4 4 i s 4 4 r s f.• s• r. r•• •• • i• r f i i Ms i i f f 6 1 1 1 ! . • I i • f . • • 4 • 4 i 4 ! ! ! I s • •••••••••••••••••••••• •_ 1.411••• }• 446464444 r444r414i.1.44r444ri4414•rirrr•4r • 4• stir •relf••4f•f1.i• se* frsi••f •fff••11•rri•f•i 6 • 1. 4444•40,444 00•0•00.44060 * laj! f i 1 • 4 .1 •4• . i► •i • i r r r4 •4 •4 • 4 1i • l 4i • 4 4 i 4 4 4 i 4 r 4 i r 4 f i 4 i 4 i . i •4 • i • f f 8 • 1••• • • 4 i 4 4• •t • ii • 4 4 f 4 • • 1 i • f 4 i 1 4 f • i r i • i f 1 e • • • • • • + i i i i r r i i ir •i . f 4i . 4 i 4 i 4i • 4' • 4i ! t f \ 4 ! r i t a 11-!• A0 0141000• 4f 6- i4• 444 f 1 i • f • f • r 14•• • • 11 1 ! • f • f• • . It !• • t f• • • f. • f• •• 04 64f 1 1• •1 •4.4 \ 1 4 1• 44•44464r • 11 l ! � •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 4 1. • f • r0i6-0* 6i • . 1 4 • 1r• •f •f•! 44 44 •R •f • i •f •R •i•!• 44 4•! • f ff ° f • f ••• .f •• • ••• f••• •r• • \\\• 1 •\t • f ,- - i -r 1 ! ! ! 4 4 . 4 4 0 4 . 4 4 4 • i 4 • 44 r 4 4 4 ! ! 4 4 8 4 4 •44 r•• 4 4 4 4+ 4 f i 4 4 4 t`4 i'ti 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 *• 8 4 4 4 4 4. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4• 4 4 4 4 4 4 4• 4 6•! t t t ii_0 !4!!t�11 ll .4 ii44i ••••••• !•6` of iv,,.'.;•_ 4.11114# e44••1444 {644 • i-_ i 4 4 4 R! 4 4 4 4► 4 i 4 f 4 4 4 f i 4 4 f 4 4 i! i• i '! • • •• • f• •f f s 1 f f Y f f! 1 4•!•! 1 '! ! i! f! f i f} 1 • • ! • a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 ! • f a•! a! 1 t/ 1 4 f l 4 // ■!! 4! 4 4/ •! I f 4 1 1 f •/. t. i f t i} f t } /! /! i!! 1 1! f i 1 i i f i!! i! i i • r i ■ 1 11 f l } • f • • f! 1 f•• I i/ f }• 11•! 4!•/ • I• i!! 4 • . . • • • • •• . 4 • R R .• R R} 4 R •R 4 f ! 4 4• }! 4 1 • • 4444 •11114 •411 \ ► 4.4 i ►4 • -i. • A world -class police department delivering professional law enforcement service WHEN OUR FACILITY WAS NEW... • TH DEPARTMEN WA ABOU 1/3 THE SIZE THAT IT I THE CIT WAS LESS THAN HALF THE SIZE IT I TODAY. • THER WAS LITTLE IDEA 0 WHAT UKWILA I TODAY. ERSONAL OMPUTERS HADN'T BEEN INVENTED YET. • PUBLI EXPECTATIONS WER PROFOUNDLY DIFFERENT. ERRORISM HADN' STRUCK OU HOMELAND. TODAY. IN THE 40 YEARS WE'VE LIVED IN THIS BUILDING 24/7, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A COMPREHENSIVE REMODEL. INEFFICIENCY EFFECTS • t ! • • • • ,1b• as■ • No MEETING CUSTOMERS' r_ • ••••••••••• • r•••• • s•s••••s••• ••■ • sits••••••••••***•• f ••••i•ii 11i w& ),(G••iiii••i `• iii •si •• ••• •••••!if t,•!! ••yip . . •••I6••I ••••a• 1.1.*$,S 44 • AKIN OFFICERS OFF THE STREET • 1 ASTIN1 MONEY • UNINVITING 4iiKl*010ROMNIOINIKONSNINIIMM • NSAFE, PRISONERS PROCESSED 11 SAM SPACE AS Insufficient, Unsecure Parking • MOS DANGEROUS PRISONERS PROCESSED I TAKING COPS OFF THE STREETS `SICK BUILDING" BOT 6200 & 6300 RAMPED INN R INEFFECTIVE HVAC NI ROOM FO BASI FUNCTIONS • NI ROOM TI STORE ERSONA EQUIPMENT •Insufficien privacy, space, maintenance DIFFERENT UNIT DON'T SEE EACH OTHER Unsanitary shower INSUFFICIEN NUMBE WOR STATIONS ACK OF RAINING ACILITIES ACK OF (REARMS ACILITIES ANGE, TORAGE, LEANING OUR QUIPMENT IS AL OVER CDU IN A TRAILER AT TH SHOPS EM50 AT STN 51 • CAN'T HOS MEETING! SECURE T RAINING CONFERENCES, TC Lack of s • INFORMATION ECHNOLOGY ' CCESS QUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ADIOS CAR AMERA 1 ICROPHONE FLASHLIGHTS AMERAS ECORDERS HONES FUTURE XPECTATIONS si i • i i i i i ## i 1.4 4 4 1 4 4 414 6 4 4 1 1 6 6 4 - - .... <. tiisitI Not enough outlets, not enough space for gear, antiquated • i• 1 i • •• • : • NOT PROTECTEI FROP ATTACK ECURITY 0 CITIZENS STAFF • HEALTH SAFETY 0 STAFF LEGAL ISSUES CAS SECURITY VIDENC STORAGE Old fire sprinkler over our cases ......■ ■ ■■:: •••• •••• MENEM■aa. . ... ■.■■a ■■■ ■a !' ••••• 1111■■ r ■.. ■a.. .......' ••••••• ..■■1111 •••••• • 1 •••• •••• w •••• ••• •• 1111... 1••• ■...a #••••• • IN MIME \a■.... ma f ' 11 Tukwila Municipal Court Facility Challenges Impact to Public Service • • • FORMER MAYORS OF KW ILA • -4:;4hidiiiti;".:!!!!!411 9..it,:illillir Safety and Security Safety and Security Review Schedule March /April • City Council Workshops • F &S, CAP Committee Review Outreach Plan • Public Outreach • Open houses, meetings, media, mailing, TukTV, website, social media, more • Council Public Hearing • Council Deliberation • August 1— Last Council meeting before King County Elections' deadline • August 2 — King County Elections' Deadline to file a resolution for November ballot /4" 3 1 46