Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial 2016-04-11 Facilities Plan Workshop 2 - Council Comments and QuestionsDate 2016 Facilities Plan Review COUNCIL COMMENTS /QUESTIONS Councilmember Comment/Question Robertson What is included in 21 M for equipment and apparatus? Robertson Quinn Kruller Kruller Robertson Quinn Does Plan B include the administration's recommendation? Was there a reassessment of the numbers? How long is this proposed bond? Why is a proposed Public Safety building prioritized in this proposal when the shops and fire stations are in such poor condition? What is the impact to homeowner per year for each scenario? Describe the length of time the City has known of facility deficiencies to the degree they are impacting service delivery. Response 20 year bond. It is the equivalent to $900 a year from the general fund, which is what we would need to spend to fully fund equipment and apparatus if we did it out of the general fund. Yes Yes, the numbers were slightly adjusted with the addition of Plan B and are not expected to change. 20 years This was the recommendation of the steering committee, which prioritized public safety. The Council can make a decision on sequencing. Will be provided. The City's facilities have been an issue since annexations caused some of our staff to double in different work groups — such as police. While the City brought on significantly more staff to provide services to the new residents, expanded or new facilities were not included. Since that time, staff levels have only continued to grow to meet the City's service needs and yet, with the exception of acquiring the 6300 building, we have continued to focus our investments in other capital efforts such as TIB transformation, major infrastructure projects, etc. In 2008, a consultant study identified the significant seismic deficiencies in many of our buildings but the subsequent recession did not allow us to do any major investments. Through the 2012 strategic plan process there was a recognition of the importance of city facilities, and council appropriated $350,000 for the facilities study in the 2013/2014 budget to begin addressing the issue. Updated 4/5/16