Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2016-05-16 Item 4F - Grant Application - Community Development Block Grant for 2017 Minor Home Repair Program for $125,000 (Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines, and Covington)COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ----------------- b litial r --------------------------- - - - - -- I ITEM No. Meetin g Date Pre aced by May •'.� reni v COU1267% reuiem 05/16/16 E C ❑ Bid Ayard M(l Date E] Public Hearing M/g Date ❑ Other Afl q Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ® Mayor ❑ FIR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ TS ❑ PAR ❑ Police ❑ PIF SPONSOR'S The Office of Human Services is applying to the King County Community Development St`lt�lz}' Block Grant program for 2017 for the multi - jurisdictional Minor Home Repair program. The City Council must authorize the Mayor's signature on the application. We are applying for $125,000 to be split between the cities of Tukwila, Des Moines, Covington and SeaTac. m, ❑ COW mtg. N CA &P Cmte ❑ h &S Cmtc ❑ Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE': 05/09/16 CONI1NIIITEF. CHAIR: QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Human Services, Mayor's Office Cc>MMIT"Fk Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Meeting COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPIND1'1'URI Rh:QUiRIa AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Fund Source: HUD Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 05/16/16 ITEM INFORMATION 4. F. .• STAITSPONSOR: EVIE BOYKAN 05/16/16 AGFINDA ITI?NI TITI.I! Community Development Block Grant Minor Home Repair Program 2017 C -� 17 �:G ORY ❑ Dig cusxion ,111g Date ® Motion Altg Date 05116116 ❑ Resolution t14tg Date ❑ Ordinance Ali g Date ❑ Bid Ayard M(l Date E] Public Hearing M/g Date ❑ Other Afl q Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ® Mayor ❑ FIR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ TS ❑ PAR ❑ Police ❑ PIF SPONSOR'S The Office of Human Services is applying to the King County Community Development St`lt�lz}' Block Grant program for 2017 for the multi - jurisdictional Minor Home Repair program. The City Council must authorize the Mayor's signature on the application. We are applying for $125,000 to be split between the cities of Tukwila, Des Moines, Covington and SeaTac. m, ❑ COW mtg. N CA &P Cmte ❑ h &S Cmtc ❑ Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE': 05/09/16 CONI1NIIITEF. CHAIR: QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Human Services, Mayor's Office Cc>MMIT"Fk Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Meeting COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPIND1'1'URI Rh:QUiRIa AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Fund Source: HUD Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 05/16/16 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 05/16/16 Informational Memorandum dated 4/27/16 Draft application Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 05/09/16 .• 70 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor 13 TO: Community Affairs and Parks Committee FROM: Evie Boykan, Human Services Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: April 27, 2016 SUBJECT: Authorization to submit CDBG Application for Minor Home Repair 2017 P14IN King County must receive a Mayor's signed application, as authorized by the City Council, for the annual application to King County for Federal Community Development Block Grants. These funds target the Tukwila Minor Home Repair program. For 2017, we propose serving as the fiscal administrator for minor home repair in the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines, and Covington. This program successfully assists low and moderate income homeowners in maintaining their homes. We are applying for $125,000 for the 4 cities. BACKGROUND The Office of Human Services has been administering this program in-house since 2005. In 2015 our contractors served 20 unduplicated Tukwila households with 93 hours of labor. While we are still spending on 2015 dollars, we expect to receive a contract this spring/summer for 2016 dollars. Tukwila's current budget for this program is $130,000 for the entire program with $30,000 for Tukwila. DISCUSSION This application competes county wide with other capital, federal applications from both cities and non-profit agencies. Tukwila sits at the table to recommend capital projects, but of course cannot vote on their own application. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to forward this item to the May 16, 2016 Regular Meeting Consent agenda. ATTACHMENTS Application— The full application is in process. 71 72 May 18, 2016 Kathy Tremper, Community Development Coordinator King County Housing and Community Development Program Chinook Building, Fifth Floor 401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 510 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject:RFP No. 2017_53116_HCD -CD 2017 CDBG Capital Application The City of Tukwila is pleased to submit an application for the Tukwila, SeaTac, Covington, Des Moines Minor Home Repair program in the amount of $125,000 through ZoomGrants' online application management system for RFP No. 2017_53116_HCD -CD, King County Consortium 2017 CDBG Capital Non - Housing allocation process. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the information included in this application has been carefully examined. Applicant understands and agrees to comply with the policies rules and regulations referenced in the application if funding is awarded. It is further understood that information presented in this application will become a part of any subsequent funding contract. Authorized Signature of Applicant Name and Title: Allan Ekberg, Mayor E -mail Address: AIIan.Ekberg @tukwilawa.gov Applicant Contact Information for information regarding this application: Name and Title: Evie Boykan, Human Services Manager E -mail Address: Evie.Boykan @tukwilawa.gov The letter of Certification is to be signed by an authorized representative of the organization and uploaded prior to midnight May 31, 2016. 73 74 La King County on)Grantslm King County, WA Department of Community and Human Services DCHS/HCD-CD-53116 CDBG Capital Funds 5/31/2016 deadline City of Tukwila Tukwila, SeaTac, Covington, Des Moines Minor Home Repair Program $ 125,000 Requested $ 100,000 Secondary arnount$ Project Contact Evie Boykan evigj)o1k,9nftWkwi1awa-aov Tel: 206-433-7180 Additional Contacts stacy.hansen@tukwilawa.gov Summary Questions City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 City Administrator David Cline David. C lin e6, tu kwi lawa.aov Telephone206-433-1800 Fax 206-433-7191 Web www.tukwilawa.gov 1. Type of Organization Upload Supporting Documentation as applicable. Non-Profits and Special Districts, see document requirements in Pre-Application tab- 100.1 thru 100.7 F_ 501(c)(3) Non-Profit ✓ Municipal Government Agency F Institute of Higher Education F Special District King County Department Public Housing Authority Other: Pre-Application Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #2. Project Location 1. Please provide the exact Address of where the project is located (not the agency address) preferred format: address, city, state, zip. If the location is a intersection please find the closest address. Upload document and identify as 000.1 King County I-Map Depicting Location; Form 200.1 Photos; Form 200.2 Site Plan The Program will take place in the jurisdictional boundaries of the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Covington and Des Moines, The zipcodes covered include 98148, 98168, 98178, 98188, 98198. Single family homeowners who have lived in their homes for 1 year and who meet income eligibility are eligible for the program depending on the nature of the work that needs to be done. Project Category 2. What category does your project fit into? Upload Supporting Documentation as applicable. Non-Profits and Special Districts, see document requirements - 100.1 thru 100.7 Community Facility Public Improvements F Parks F_ Microenterprise 75 Minor Home Repair Housing Human Services F Other: 3, What type of activity is involved? Check all that apply F Acquisition ✓ Rehabilitation ✓ Construction F Services Population Served .............. . . . .............. . ......... . .... 4. How will the project's eligibility for CDBG funding be established? If Area Benefit, contact Eric Jensen to complete 800.1 Census Data. If Limited Clientele, upload appropriate documentation demonstrating determination of eligibility, All Applicants - Upload document identified as 000.3 Map of Service Delivery Area r_ Area Benefit (include map of service area in uploaded documents) ✓ Limited Clientele (include form used to document income in document upload section). F Presumed Benefit Eligible (severely disabled adults, abused children, battered spouses, homeless, elderly over 62 years of age) F Elimination of Slum/blight (spot basis) F Survey -- Conducted per HUD Regulations Project Description ........ . ........... . . .......... . ..... I— .............. ­­­ ............................. . ..... . . . . . .. 5. Provide a brief overview of the project and speak specifically how Consortium CDBG funds will be used. CDBG funds will be used to rehabilitate and provide health and safety work for low to moderate income homeowner occupied housing to preserve affordable housing units. The funds pay for repair and rehab in the electrical, plumbing and other trades . Project Funding ..... - ------- 6. Provide background and explanation of fund sources and status of other funding pursued for this project, i.e, what other grantlfund sources have you submitted applications? What funds have been committed and is there a time expiration for those funds. Are any of the 'Other' funds from a federal source? This program depends on the in-kind funds of the staffing from the respective cities that are involved in administering this program. With the exception of the city of Des Moines, all staff contribute their time to screen clients, hire and pay contractors and administer the full program. No other federal funds or municipal funds are used for this purpose. 7. What public participation has been held or do you anticipate holding during the course of the Pre-application and RFP process regarding this funding request? This proposed project will be reviewed by City Council committees and the full Council. All Council meetings are advertised and open to the public. Public participation also takes the form of client satisfaction surveys which are completed annually. Organization 8. Describe how long your agency as offered the services associated with the project. Present agency's capabilities, number and characteristics of clients served, and required licenses to operate. Upload required document identified as 100.3 List of Agency Board Members; 100.4 Current Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation; 100.5 Organization Chart- 100.8 Agency Recent Audit and /or General Ledger and Balance Sheet for 2015. The Human Services Manager has successfully operated this program with CDBG funds since 2005. The City of Tukwila provides standard municipal services to a population of about 19,300 residents. 9. Services: Describe the specific service(s) or need your program is designed to meet. Quantify this need, using local or regional data that confirm or describe the problem or need. How much of the need are you currently serving? The majority of the single family housing stock in the respective 4 cities was built prior to 1978, resulting in the need for repair and maintenance work to maintain the viability of affordable housing. The low mod populations ranges from 25% in the City of Covington to 64% in the City of Tukwila. Indicators of poverty such as free and reduced lunch statistics, food bank statistics and DSHS stats show that there is a disproportionate number of individuals and families that are living in poverty. Almost half of the Tukwila residents are burdened by housing costs paying more than 30% of their income for housing. The majority of our homeowners using the program historically make 50% of median income and below. With 25 % of our population using the food bank and DSHS, we are not experiencing the economic recovery of other communities. We believe we are serving about 10% of the need. In SeaTac 17% of the population lives at or below the poverty level. Rehab and maintenance issues such as plumbing, electrical, hvac and carpentry represent housing needs that many of our low income homeowners defer, or are unable to schedule due to the strain on their budget. Private costs for these services continue to climb. Our surveys of client satisfaction have indicated that our homeowners consider this a vital service. Over 95% are very satisfied with services that have been provided. 10. What other activities does the agency perform -- how will the proposed program be delineated from other programs offered 76 and /or services? All basic municipal services such as fire, police, public works, planning and recreation are available to the business and residential community. There is no budget available for housing repair or rehabilitation, nor would it be available without CDBG. 11. ELIGIBILITY: How do you determine eligibility (income screening, location of residence, eligibility in other government programs? Are you familiar with current CDBG income screening requirements? Applicants will be required to provide a copy of the tool used for client intake process as an attachment to the application phase. Upload document identified as 100.6 Intake Tool Used to Qualify Eligibility Having managed the program for 11 years we are very familiar with income screening, identifying residency, and eligibility of social and health programs. Since our main work is human services we are well in touch with the housing related needs in the community. Years ago we developed a screening tool that has already been vetted by staff in King County Housing and Community Development. Each client has a unique file that includes their application, their evidence of income, and required environmental review and lead based paint screens. The tool for screening will be attached to this document. 12. Provide the estimated milestones for completion of your project. r't 3v ✓c1r not Fart i r'rf< C! hocauso of tho v», >wur to tip - 13. Program Oriented Milestones: provide the date range for the quarters represented for service delivery. Microenterprise: Upload required document identified as 500.3; Minor Home Repair: Upload required document identified as 600.2 Depending on when the contract is awarded, construction activities and ongoing marketing will take place during each quarter. Since this is a familiar program in the community, there need not be any delays in service delivery. 14. Do you anticipate electing to charge the permissible Indirect cost rate allowed by §200.414 (f) Indirect (F&A) costs. See "Requirements Section " in Program Summary for reference and context Indicate either "Yes -- provide an explanation of the status of an Indirect Cost Plan ",_ drafting_ being reviewed approval underway or "No - we decline to take advantage of the option to charge an indirect cost rate." No we decline to take advantage of the option to charge an indirect cost rate. 15, This RFP does not provide grant opportunities in this category, Please visit the King County OCl`IS Housing and Community Development Web Site for grant opportunities in this category that might he posted, 0SVVff r c,! pre o ofe-r9 boc ausea of the .err we. r lo #2t Documents Requested " Required? Attached Documents 000.1_ All Applicants: I -Map depicting project location and ✓ 0001 exan) le of oroiecl location surrounding area information. 000.2_ Pre -App Phase - Consortium Service Delivery Data. ✓ 000.2 service deliver area Applies to ALL Applicants ctownload tem lato 000.3_ All Applicants - Map with a line depicting area of Service ✓ 000 3 service delive area Delivery. If all King County or sub - regional delivery the region on the map, 100.1_Pre- Application Phase - Non -Profit IRS Letter of ✓ NA Re ue;sted r€on rofit letter Designation, 100.3_Pre -App Phase: Non- Profit/Special Districts: Current List ✓ tS2c;dai District of Agency Board Members with term and expiration dates 100.3 Ac ency board members noted. clawnioar4 terry late 100.4 Pre-App Phase: Non- Profit /Special Districts: Current ✓ i)pn Lofit ri sthi jt Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation 100.6_Programs /Services: Upload Agency's Tool used for ✓ 9�iartt intake Client Intake process 100.8_ Agency Audit and /or General Ledger and Financials for ✓ Adit €t 2015. Financials 200.1_ Environmental Review Site Photos ✓ Beluosted document etermination dov nload temglate 200,1 s to hc)toS. srte s are s.)ecrfic <ar €d not identified at this tir"e 800.1_Census Data supporting Low Moderate - Income Area census data 800.1 Benefit. Documentation should include Census Tract; Block Group information that fit within the Service Delivery Area identified in 000.3. clownlaad tecn> fate Application Questions Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #1. 77 Project Category 1. What category does your project fit into? [ Community Facility F Infrastructure Improvements F pamo F Microenmrpnse V Minor Home Repair F Other, please explain: Project Description and Background 2. ALL: Discuss the scope and magnitude of the problem or need your project is designed to address. Quantify this need using local, sub-regional v, regional data. The cities involved m this proposal have old housing stock (older than 38 years) which shows signs of neglect and mdeterioration. This aging housing stock requires more money for maintenance which is difficult for residents already burdened by other economic vtroom`rs. The majority m homeowners served in this program are at 50% of median income and below. Many are on fixed incomes. Census figures, the American Community survey, school district data, and Brookings Institute document the increased percentages of households living in poverty. The inability for our homeowners to maintain the plumbing, electrical, and other maintenance categories means that their utility costs may be higher, and the long term preservation of affordable housing is compromised. We estimate serving 10% of the need, and we find that some homeowners cannot qualify for King County Housing Repair due to the loan to value ratio, and the limited funds that are available. o. ALL: Describe how the project/program /s accessible ooitrelates tp the following: 1) transportation, o) immediacy v,services (waiting xstv) and a} reaching isolated individuals. All services are provided at the homeowners residence. As long as contractors and funds are available, homeowners are served on a first come first served basis. Due to the coordination across departments in jurisdictions, referrals of more isolated individuals are made. Code enforcement, Police and Fire, Senior program staff, concerned neighbors, local faith based organizations all have eyes out on our residents, and connections are easily made to our programs. Our communications departments have used door to door surveying, and a variety of media tools to both advertise the program and reach out to those that may not actively advocate for themselves. Word of mouth from successfully served residents also contribute to the sharing or this information across the single family neighborhoods. 4. ALL: Can your project or program be funded at a reduced level? If yes, indicate the minimum amount needed to make the project viable. Indicate what uxanee(s) would upmade to the scope v, the project to address the reduction mfunds? Yes, the program can be funded at a reduced level. Since the majority of funding goes into the construction costs, we would serve less households, and potentially would narrow the scope of acceptable jobs. We are finding the repairs are costing more money than they did several years ago, so it io likely that funds would run out faster. We have adjusted our program policies to allow more money per household, and this might need to be scaled back i, funds are reduced. m, Identify Green Building techniques, green building materials, onergy efficient design(s) and pervious surfaces that will bm used im construction arid long term use for energy conservation. -answer not peme^,euuovauseorme answer mftl- 6, Specify any known code or safety violations, Will updating any of Vie systems(s) realize cost or energy savings within reasonable time? if so, please explain - include the estimated payback period (in terms of years or other time frame). -answer not pnouenteo because o/meunswmrm#�- 7. COMMUNITY FACILITY: Describe what plan exist v,actions that are being considered tmaddress any inadequacies identified regarding the facility condition. Example: new roof, repair steps, sidewalks, exterior painting, 'enawor not nesenteubecouse of the answer to #/' 8. COMMUNITY FACILITY: Change of Use and Security Insti,urnents are a requirement. Review, sign and uptoad certification acknowledging the requirements and agency commitment associated with a funding award. 'unowm not preemmduenavoem the answer m#1 s, CAPITAL, PROJECTS: Describe the scope m detail and specify the size wr the project (SF/LF-i,mppocmh|o). Engineer's orArchitect's Estirnate should correlate to the construction funding noted on the construction livre item*^ your project budget. -ansover no/prexe,ted bera,mnm'me answer m#1' 10, CAp/TAL PROJECTS: Specify how you arrived at the total cost or the project. Identify the permits that will wm required for the project as well as any land use approval (Le. lot line adjustment, subdivision, rezone, conditional use, atc). -answer not pmoonted becn.ono/ the arnww m#/- 11. Describe extent the project addresses apvm/c health and/or safety need. Attach all supporting documentation that relates to this need. (e.g. orders, letters, traffic accident counts, Department p, Transportation (ooT} public safety staumu,w). Safe and healthy housing ie seen ao increasingly important regarding longevity of our residents. The health costs of mold, excessive moisture, unsafe stairs, wobbly railings, presence of pests, unclean furnaces can contribute to long term negative health outcomes in addition to degradation of the housing infrastructure. Recognizing this need, our code enforcement department has expanded their rental licensing program to include healthy housing standards. We see that our work actively contributes to homelessness prevention, by keeping the home in a habitable condition - Our fire departments witness living conditions that contribute to poor health and safety concerns, and this attention has reinforced our commitment to use our program to contribute to the best stability possible for often some very vulnerable residents. Without the intervention of this program, some Citizen Participation Documentation 12. INFRASTRUCTUREIPARKS; Capital improvement Plan (CIP)/ Park or Neighborhood Plaw Where is this project listed in priorities, |s it identified as high, medium or low on the list? If so, what rote or percentage does it constitute in this proposal? -answer m*piexonteu because, n/meermwe�m#/- ServiceDelivoryArea—Projeoand/o,P,ogran 13. ALL: The project must serve either an area which is primarily residential and predominately low/mod income (Area Benefit) or uw limited u` serving coBa income eligible clientele vr residents. Describe the area o, those residents that will benefit. Required Ameoomont(s): FOR Infrastructure: Census data supporting LMA or Survey Results of specified area approved by HCD Staff FOR Community Facility, Minor Home Repair mwicmvnmmrise Program: Income Screening Tool All residents are vetted for service by completing a standard application used by all cities and by submitting necessary documentation to show that they fall within eligible income guidelines. The screening tool is attached for this application. Several of our cities have some of the highest documented indicators of poverty as referenced in various sources; school district, census, Department of Social and Health Services, the Road Map efforts, King County Public Health Department etc. All low to moderate income residents who live within the jurisdictional boundaries of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington will ma eligible for services once they have filled out their applications and provided documentation uv source mrincome. Ownership n, the home io verified uy King County parcel viewer. 14. ALL: Briefly describe the agency's existing staff positions/qualifications, and its capacity to carry out this activity. Does your agency have a personnel policy manual with a^ affirmative action plan and grievance procedures. The staff involved in this multi jurisdictional program have had collectively almost 30 years of experience in managing this minor home repair program. Evie Boykan, Human Services manager has served as fiscal manager, and has implemented this program in Tukwila since 2005, and is well familiar with developing the program internally, across the cities as well as adhering to necessary regulations and procedures as identified uy King County and Housing and Urban development. Her co-worked Stacy Hansen has worked with Evie for 19 years and iu familiar with the protocol and procedures around this program. The City of Tukwila has a personnel policy manual with equal employment opportunity policies. The policies and procedures clearly spell out grievance procedures. This policy ie available onrequest. 15. PROGRAM: MmRoEwrsnpRmEnr MINOR HOME REPAIR - Who will implement the program? Briefly describe their qualifications. Provide copy o, written Program Policies and Procedures Microenterprise: upload required documents identified as 500.1 Program Policies and Procedures and 500.2 Resumes o, Project Team Minor Home Repair: upload required document Vou1 The City o,Tukwila Human Services Manager will implement the program for Tukwila and serve as the fiscal agent with King County. In addition the Human Services managers of SeaTac and Covington will plan and implement the program in their respective cities. SeaTac has 9 years of experience in managing this program and the Covington staff has 6 years. The Des Moines permit staff has managed this program internally for several years and will continue supporting this program. 16, PROGRAM M!CRoEmTeRpRiSE:vv»at technical assistance wi|/be offered t^ assist small business orpareom(s) interested m establishing abusiness? -answer riot pa,,oe^ted because, or the ansmmrm#/' 17,peoGexWw/CROEwTEmpR!sEm,M/m0e HOME REPAIR -What will um measured and how will performance measures bwreported outside the number or unduplicated persons assisted? 'anome/no/pm*e^mobvoavnoortheano=erto#v' 18. ALL: What is the current use of the site? If Program, what other services are offered at this site? Upload documents coo.1_xwnpeouzLum,pmovww,mmpmnmmnp�m. The si�samaxmsm^nna|sinnmmmi|yowner occupied homes. mERx Environmental Review 19. ALL: npvup/*m: Identify the nearest natural watenpvuv(strmam.lake, etc.) How far, and in which direction mn from the project sner As the sites are all over the footprint of the city boundaries, there is not a single natural waterbody that applies in this case. In some areas in Tukwila, several v, the neighborhoods are located in areas that are relatively close to the Green River. Staff understand the potential limitations of providing service in a floodplain, but as King county staff are now doing environmental reviews on all project sites prior to work being done, we don't see this aoubarrier. 20. Endongar*daw*m/es Acv How much o,m net increase im impervious surface (exan`plw: c^nnrwto/mwnomu) will occur (if mpp/icmma). Does m current atprmwotw,system exist at the project site? Please describe. -o"uwo' riot rmsonmV because ormoan:we/to#/- 21 . Archaeology: Will the project excavate or otherwise disturb soil that has not been disturbed before, and if so, to what depth avid horizontal dimensions? 'an�wvrno/pmsenmuoevavsoo(m^anowerm#�' 2c.T^xios� Has m Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (or equivalent tox!cm review) been completed? What was the previous use of this property? What iw the use */ properties surrounding the project site? -ansvver mof prosenied b�-wause 0 Uw answe� to # I- 23. ALL: Other Environmental Factors; check any and all that apply. F FEMA designated floodplain F Welland F Ecological I-se nsitive area F Designated Historic neighborhood F Other: V No Known Factors 24� ALL: Choice-Lirniting Activities� Do you anticipate undertaking any of the following actions on this project after submittal of your application on May 31, 2016? Property acquisition, clearing, grading, site prop, etc.? If so, describe. -a�is'wer oot presooted becauso of theanswer to 91- 25. PARKS� Describe what fflan exist or actions are being considered to address any inadequacies identified regarding the park and/or structure conditions. -answer not presented becaose, or the answer to 91- 26. Will your project generate Program Income? Type Yes or No. If yes, please explain. No Budget Funds Requested Matching Funding Sources/Revenues Committed Not(',ommi((�A Gornrnii�ed 1"Ual Project by Source Funds Cost King County Consortium CDBG $ 125,000.00 $ 125,000�00$ 125�000.00 $ 125,000,00 Joint Agreement City CDBG or Other $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 Funds HOME Consortium City CDBG or Other $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 Funds Federal $ 0�00 $ 0�00 $ 0,00 State $0.00 $0.00 $0,0() Local and/or City, County Funds $0.00 $0.00 � 0,00 Private $0.00 $0,00 $0,00 In-Kind $25,000.00 $0.00 $ 25�000,00 25�OOD�00 $ 25,0M),00 Other (specify) $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 Other (specify) $0.00 $0.00 $ ' 0,00 $ 0�00 $0,00 Total $ 150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $ 150,000.00 $ $ 150.000m 150,000.00 Funding Uses/Expenses King Cc CDBG Joint or HOME State/Local In-Kind Other City CDBG Funds Environmental Review (KC Set-aside) $2,500.00 Appraisl(s) Architect/Engineer Permit Design and Procurement of $ 119,000.00 Construction Construction *Upload Architect or Engineers Wet Stamped Estimate Project Management/ Agency $3,500.00 $25,000.00 Project Management/ Contractor Acquisition- any type (If applicable) Administrative Costs (O&M, Travel, etc) Indirect Cost per 2 CFR 200.414(f) Other; Specifly Use $0.00 $0,00 Total $ 125,000.00 $0.00 $ 0.00$ 25,000.00 $0.00 Budget Narrative 1. Cities are fully dependent on the CDBG funds to deliver the program. In-kind contribution represents the estimate of value of staff that are implementing the program. This contributes as the cost of administering the program. The cost of construction has been based on historical funding awards and our ability to get the money out the door. 2. Anticipated dates of award are fully dependent on the award of the CDBG funding. No other funds are committed. No other expiration dates for in-kind contributions. NNAI L2"V Tables There are no other funds used for this program, however we seek to leverage additional programs that contribute to the maintenance of the housing stock. This includes King County Housing Repair Program, Rebuilding Together Seattle, Habitat for Humanity, and the King County weatherization program. Service Delivery # of Beneficiaries NORTHEAST SUB- REGION Beaux Arts Bothell Carnation Clyde Hill Duvall Hunts Point Issaquah Kenmore Lake Forest Park Medina Mercer Island Newcastle North Bend Sammamish Skykomish Snoqualmie Woodinville Yarrow Point Uninc.King Co. Kirkland -- Joint Agreement City Redmond -- Joint Agreement City Shoreline -- Joint Agreement City Total 0 SOUTH SUB - REGION Algona Black Diamond Burien Covington 14 Des Moines 13 Enumclaw Maple Valley Pacific SeaTac 19 Tukwila 19 Uninc. King Co Renton -- Joint Agreement City Total 65 OUTSIDE OF CDBG CONSORTIUM Auburn _ Bellevue Federal Way Kent Seattle 3 Other Total 0 (Grand Total listed below) Total 65 Documents Documents Requested * Required? Attached Documents 000.0 _ ALL Applications: Application Certification -, signed and an Agency Letterhead download template 100.2_ADA 504 Self Evaluation Template (if applicable). ✓ 11002 ADA 504 Self�evaluotion download tem>lat 100.5–All Applicants - Organization Chart ✓ 101:).5 orr chart 100.7–Non- Profits: King County Equal Benefits Substantial ✓ 1007 Compliance Authorization Form 200.2–Site Plan /I -Map ✓ 1002 Site plan 300.1–Community Facility Comprehensive Assessment ✓ 300.1 Com Facilit y Assessment dc.>wnioad templ<t 300.2–Community Facility: Agency 10 year Proforma ✓ 3002 Corrlmunit facilit a enc download fiem 5iate _. ... 300.3–Community Facility: Wet stamped Architect Estimate ✓ 300.3 Arrhitect download template 300.4_ComFac_Change of Use /Ownership AuthForm ✓ _3004 Clranc e of tlse CE d..,S.av�7ln�d terrl�r� 400.1_ Infrastructure /Parks: Capital Improvement Plan - Provide ✓ A001 cover page of the CIP; excerpts of pertinent pages that reference your proposed project and evidence of the date of publication. Upload as one .pdf 400.2–infrastructure/Parks: Wet Stamped Engineer, Estimate ✓ 400.1 g2AUoiidte;trr late 400.3_ Park and Structure(s) Comprehensive Assessment ✓ A-00 -1 download tem date 500.1_PROGRAMS Microenterprise Program Policies and i/ 400.2 Parks Procedures 500.1 500.2–PROGRAMS: Microenterprise: Resume of project team ✓ 500.2 Microenter rise resumes members 500.3–PROGRAMS: Microenterprise Timelines Performance ✓ 5003 r,sucaies n icrcc>ntc� rise Measures ciowniue {.f teemate 600.1–PROGRAMS: Minor Home Repair Program Policies and ✓ E00.1 c lines acid racedures Procedures 600.2 PROGRAMS MHR Timelines Performance Measures ✓ 600.2 iirnelinesi erformancc measures eownload tem late 700.1_King County W9 - (if new contractor to King County). ✓ ELI Requested Document Not Applicable download tom -)late Other Supporting Documents Agency Wants Reviewers to Consider in the Evaluation. * ZoomGrantsT' is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents. Application ID: 51194 Become a `r;nor "" on Facebook Problems? Contact us at Ckuntz(ions Woo,nGranta cola 02002 -2016 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved. 'ZoomGrants' and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC. LM i I &rn-er i I City Council Community Affairs and Parks Committee COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes May 9, 2016 - 5:30 p.m. - Council Chamber, City Hall Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Chair; Kathy Hougardy, Thomas M d Staff: David Cline, Evie Boykan, Dave Johnson, Rick%Sfitl, B Linton, Nora Gierloff, Mary Hulvey, Jack Pace, Bob Giberson, KathStetsori, Fchel Bianchi, Peggy McCarthy, Laurel Humphrey CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Quinn called the rrgo ifhg to order at 5:30 p.m. I. ANNOUNCEMENT II. BUSINESSAGENDA A. Agreement: Duwamish Hill Preserve Staff is seeking Council approval of ankpee amount of $48,298 for w k tp,, be dons materials, and constrU tion of etched meta[ for this agreement f from the`4 culture gr APPROVAL. FOIIISIRD TO MAY 1 2016 REG B. Sta z G,gjj, inks Pro Shop 3 FTE, although it ha a ith regard This pro 1 includes position i ilable fr position anducti APPROVAL. FOF�1N4[ ment,,fdC rvace with Mette Hanson, M.S. in the the 011uwaM,is :)Mill Preserve, including design, inns, entrance kiosk, and bench blocks. Funding grit award received in April 2016. UNANIMOUS ULAR CONSENT AGENDA. royal of an additional 0.5 Full Time Employee (FTE) to the Foster in rrll, bringing the total to 3.5 FTE. The original model included en op rating with 3.0 FTE since August 2014. This has recently been tithe customer service commitment and growth in golf programming. ✓0�.0 employees and two 0.75 employees. Funding for the additional "isting operating budget, including remainder from a modified �n Pro Shop Extra Labor and Golf maintenance. UNANIMOUS O MAY 16, 2016 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. C. 2017 Community Development Block Grant Application Staff is seeking Council approval to submit an application to King County requesting $125,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds for the 2017 Minor Home Repair Program. The proposal is forTukwila's Office of Human Services to continue to serve as fiscal administrator for minor home repair in the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington. The current program budget is $130,000, with $30,000 designated for Tukwila households. In 2015 contractors served 20 unduplicated Tukwila households with 93 hours of labor. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 16, 2016 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA.