Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit MI02-038 - HILLCREST APARTMENTS - SHORINGHILLCREST APARTMENTS 14903 INTERURABAN AV S M. EXPIRED 11-19-03 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 3597000020 Address: 14891 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Suite No: Tenant: PERMIT COMMENTS HILLCREST APARTMENTS SHORING Permit Number: Status: Applied Date: Issue Date: M102 -038 EXPIRED 03/21/2002 04/03/2003 1: 4/09/02 PW FORWARDED PLANS, CALCS AND GEOTECH LETTERS PACKET TO GERARD BUECHEL, P.E. OF SHANON & WILSON FOR AND ESTIMATE OF THE PEER REVIEW COST. AS OF 4/09/02 OWNER, MR ING HAS NOT REIMBURSED THE CITY FOR $5,107.53 TO COVER S & W PEER REVIEW COST. JJS. 2: 4/26/02 PW RECEIVED A $ 5,107.63 CHECK FROM HILLCREST APTS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO TO COVER COST OF PREVIOUS S &W GEOTECH PEER REVIEWS PO's # 39625 & 12624 REQUIRED UNDER EXPIRED PERMIT MI99.0091. JJS. 3: 6/03/01 PW RECEIVED A FIVE PAGE PEER REVIEW COMMENT LETTER FROM GERARD J. BUECHEL,P.E. OF SHANNON & WILSON; COPIES FORWARDED TO BLDG OFFICIAL & BLDG PLAN CHECKER. JJS. 4: Before Issuance of MI permit applicant must enter Into a covenant with the City Idemnffying the City against any future claims resulting from landslides, earth movement etc... According to David St Pierre, City Attorney, this covenant shall be recorded with title to the land and run with the land, Any questions, contact David St P. Art Pederson 5: Associated SEPA (E02-008) DNS included a landscape plan for landscape screening of the proposed wall at Its base and along the top parallel to the proposed fence. See file for copy of plan, Art Pederson 6: 07 -17 -02 CORRECTION LETTER #1 MAILED TO ROBERT THOMPSON. DENIED: BUILDING (KENN), PLANNING (ART), PUBLIC WORKS (JJS), KAS 7: 7/22/02 PW RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM DAVE MEISSNER AT (206)623.8587 WHO IS WORKING ON A PURCHASE AGRMNT FOR THE APT COMPLEX ASKING VARIOUS QUESTION. PW REQUESTED HIM TO FAX A LIST OF HIS QUESTIONS, SO THEY CAN BE ANSWERED CORRECTLY. HE ALSO CALLED THE BLDG OFFICIAL. JJS. 8: 7/25/02 AS OF TODAY PW HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY FAX FROM DAVE MEISSNER, HOWEVER BASED ON HIS INQUIERY PW CHECKED STATUS OF BACKFLOWS WITH SHOPS. THERE ARE NO BACKFLOWS FOR FIRE AND NO BACKFLOWS FOR IRRIGATION. JJS. 9: 7/29/02 PW MAILED LANDSCAPING PLAN RECEIVED FROM ART PETERSON, PLANNING DEPT, TO ALAN MURRAY OF EVERGREEN ENGINEERING, PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER AND INFORMED HIM THAT LANDSCAPI9NG PLAN NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED W /CIVIL PLANS SINCE DRAINAGE SWALE WAS NOT SHOWN ON THE LANSCAPING PLAN. COORDINATION WITH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER IS ALSO REQUIRED. JJS. 10: 8/16/02 PW MAILED A LETTER TO MR ING OF HELEN INVESTMENTS VIA CERT MAIL WITH ac TO GRAN,Inc. REQUESTING PAYMENT OF $1,960.00 TO COVER 70% OF SHANNON & WILSON THIRD PEER REVIEW doc: Comments M102 -038 Printed: 06.14 -2004 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 COMPLETED IN JUNE 2002 PER S &W INVOICE #0000066174.JJS 11: 8/23/02 PW RECEIVED CONFIRMATION THAT THE ABOVE LETTER WAS RECEIVED BY MR LOWELL ING ON 8/20 /02. JJS 12: 9 -27.02 HAD TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH ROBERT THOMPSON CONCERNING THE EXPIRATION OF PERMIT APPLICATION. MR, THOMPSON WAS READILY AGREEABLE TO SUBMITTING A FORMAL REQUEST FOR EXTENSION AS THEY HAVE EVERY INTENTION OF PURSUING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, HE WILL FAX IN THE REQUEST AS WELL AS MAIL IN THE ORIGINAL. (SEE CONVERSATION RECORD IN FILE) - SKS 13: 9 -27002 FOLLOW -UP LETTER CONCERNING EXPIRATION OF APPLICATION MAILED TO ROBERT THOMPSON. GIVEN FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS FROM DATE OF LETTER TO RESPOND. CLOSE OUT FILE END OF DAY OCTOBER 4, 2002 - SKS 14: 09.27 -02 RECEIVED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION FROM ROB THOMPSON. 15: 09.27.02 EXTENSION GRANTED. NEW EXPIRATION IS 3/21/03. 16: 10.01.02 RECEIVED RESPONSE TO CORRECTION LETTER 111 FROM ROB THOMPSON PROVIDING RESPONSE LETTER FROM CT ENGINEERING, RESPONSE LETTER FROM EVERGREEN ENGINEERING SERVICES, RESPONSE LETTER FRO CEOTECH CONSULTANTS, REVISED LAGGING CALCS, VARIOUS LEGAL AND EASEMENT AGREEMENTS, REVISED STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, REVISED CIVIL DRAWINGS AND NEW LANDSCAPE PLAN. ROUTED TO ALL DEPTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. KAS 17: ** *PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE - APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE RECORDED COVENANT PER PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST (SEE NORA). BLH. * ** 18: 10.22.02 PW RECEIVED S&W PEER REVIEW APPROVAL LETTER. JJS 19: 11.29.02 PW FAXED REQUESTED INFO TO KOL MEDINA, ATTY 0 FOSTER PEPPER 0 SHEFELMAN PLLC, PH NO. (206)447 -4400 WHO IS WORKING ON STEEP SLOPES EXCULPATORY AGREEMENT. )JS. 20: 12/19/02 PW RECEIVED A LETTER FROM KOOL MEDINA,ATTY REG STEEP SLOPES EXCULPATORY AGRMT. PER CONVERSATION W /PW DIRECTOR LETTER WAS FORWARDED TO DAVID ST.PIERRE, CITY ATTY .1)S. 21: 1.09.03 PW MAILED COPY OF HILLCREST APTS HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT REVIWED BY DAVI ST.PIERRE, CITY ATTY TO KOL MEDINA, ATTY OF FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC TO BE DRAFTED AND EXECUTED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. JJS 22: 2/21/03 PW RECEIVED HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT FROM KOL MEDINA FOR CITY ATTY & PW DIRECTOR SIGNATURES. J1S. 2/28/03 PW MAILED TO KOL MEDINA VIA CERT MAIL EXECUTED ORIGINAL OF SAO & HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT FOR RECORDING. JJS 23: 3/11/03 PW RECEIVED FROM KOL MEDINA AN UNOFFICIAL COPY OF RECORDED SAO CONVENANT & HOLD HARMLESS AGRMT RECORDED ON 3/05/2003 UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.20030305000245.1JS. 24: 3/17/03 PW MAILED AND FAXED A LETTER REQUESTING REMAINING PAYMENT(30 %) OF S &W GEOTECH PEER REVIEW IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 840.00 TO JOHN SAUWAGE,PROPERTY MGR OF GRAN,INC. AT (206)283.4720, EXT #225.11S. doc: Comments M102 -038 Printed: 06 -14 -2004 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 3/19/03 PW RECEIVED A $840.00 CHECK FROM GRAN, Inc. FOR THE REMAINING PORTION OF S &W PEER REVIEW; CHECK FORWARDED TO GAIL. JJS. 25: 4/21/03 PW RECEIVED A CALL FROM MR MIKE MUSIK CW 253 307.3476 WHO IS INTERESTED IN PURCHASING THE APT COMPLEX AND WANTS ADDITIONAL GEOTECH INFO. FAXED HIM A REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. JJS, 26: PERMIT WILL EXPIRE 9.30.03. EXPIRATION LETTER MAILED 9-18-03 - SKS 27: 11.19.03 PERMIT IS EXPIRED PER RSB - SKS doe: Comments M102-038 Printed: 06.14.2004 am) City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No,: 3597000020 Address: Suite No: MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT 14891 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Permit Number: Issue Date: Permit Expires On: M102 -038 04/03/2003 09/30/2003 Tenant: Name: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SHORING Address: 14903 INTERURBAN AV 5, TUKWILA, WA Owner: Name: HILLCREST ASSOCIATES Address: C/O GRAN INC, 1021 1ST AV W Contact Person: Name: ROBERT THOMPSON Address: 180 NICKERSON ST, SEATTLE, WA Contractor: Name: GRAN INC Address: 1021 1ST AV N, SEATTLE WA Contractor License No: GRANI "997NF Phone: Phone: 208. 285.4512 Phone: 208. 283.4720 Expiration Date: DESCRIPTION OF WORK: SLOPE STABILIZATION BELOW EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX, LANDSCAPE SCREENING AND STORM DRAINAGE WORK IN THE PARKING LOT. PUBLIC WORKS ACTIVITIES INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS, LAND ALTERING, STORM DRAINAGE AND STREET USE. Value of Construction: Type of Fire Protection: Type of Construction: $350,000.00 Fees Collected: $4,287.44 Uniform Building Code Edition: 1997 Occupancy per UBC: Public Works Activities: Curb Cut/Access /Sldewalk/CSS: Y Fire Loop Hydrant: N Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Land Altering: Y Landscape Irrigation: N Moving Oversize Load: N Sanitary Side Sewer: N Sewer Main Extension: N Storm Drainage: Y Street Use: Y Water Main Extension: N Water Meter: Channelization / Striping: Number: 0 Size (Inches): 0 Start Time: End Time: Volumes: Cut 497 c.y. Fill 535 c.y. Start Time: End Time: Private: Public: Private: Public: doe: Miscperm M102 -038 Printed: 04- 03.2003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431-3670 Permit Center Authorized Signature: Date: 4 -3 I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign and obtain this mechanical permit. Signature: Print Name: /Ort Pc �r Date: el 3 This permit shall become null and void If the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or If the work Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last Inspection. doe: Miscperm M102 -038 Printed: 04.03.2003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 PERMIT CONDITIONS Parcel No.: 3597000020 Address: 14891 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Suite No: Tenant: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SHORING Permit Number: Status: Applied Date: Issue Date: M102 -038 ISSUED 03/2112002 04/03/2003 1: * *'BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 2: No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Engineer and the Tukwila Building Division, 3: All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be available at the Job site prior to the start of any construction. These documents are to be maintained and available until final inspection approval is granted. 4: All structural concrete shall be special Inspected (UBC - Sec. 306(a)4 5: All structural welding shall be done by W.A.B.O. certified welders and special inspected (UBC - Sec, 306(a)5). 8: When special inspection Is required elther the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building Inspection. Copies of all special Inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division in a timely manner. Reports shall contain address, project name, permit number and type of inspection being performed. 7: The special Inspector shall submit a final signed report stating whether the work requiring special inspection was to the best of the Inspector's knowledge, In conformance with approved plans and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. 8: All construction to be done In conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1997 Edition) as amended, Uniform Mechanical Code (1997 Edition), and Washington State Energy Code (1997 Edition). 9: Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure Is In addition to any requirements for special inspection, 10: Validity of Permit, The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications, and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. 11: ** *PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT WHICH IS ATTACHED AS PART OF THiS PERMIT. 12: The applicant must notify the City Utility Inspector at (206)433.0179 upon commencement and completion of work at least 24 hours in advance. All inspection requests for utility work must also be made 24 hours in advance. 13: Permit is valid between the weekday hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. only. 14: Flagging, signing and coning shall be in accordance with MUTCD for Traffic Control. Contractor shall provide certified flagmen for traffic control. Sweep or otherwise clean streets to the satisfaction of Public Works each night around hauling route (No flushing allowed). Notify City Inspector before 12:00 Noon on Friday preceding any weekend work. 15: Any material spilled onto any street shall be cleaned up immediately. doc: Conditions M102 -038 Printed: 04-03-2003 v§ itt City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 16: Hauling over 50 cubic yards shall require application for a Hauling Permit prior to any associated activity. 17: Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented as the first order of business to prevent sedimentation off -site or into existing drainage facilities. 18: The site shall have permanent erosion control measures in place as soon as possible after final grading has been completed and prior to the Final Inspection. 19: From October 1 through April 30, cover any slopes and stockpiles that are 3H:1 V or steeper and have a vertical rise of 10 feet or more and will be unworked for greater than 12 hours. During thls time period, cover or mulch other disturbed areas, if they will be unworked more than 2 days, Covered material must be stockpiled on site at the beginning of thls period, Inspect and maintain this stabilization weekly and immediately before, during and following storms. 20: From May 1 through September 30, inspect and maintain temporary erosion prevention and sediment at least monthly. All disturbed areas of the site shall be permanently stabilized prior to final construction approval. 21: The Land Altering Permit Fee is based upon an estimated 497 cubic yards of cut and 535 cubic yards of fill, If the final quantity exceeds this amount, the developer shall be required to recalculate the final quantity and pay the difference in permit fee prior to the Final Inspection. 22: THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RETAIN A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO MONITOR THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION, PREFERABLY RETAIN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE FINAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND REVIEWED THE PLANS. IF A DIFFERENT CONSULTANT IS RETAINED BY THE OWNER , THE NEW GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER TO THE CITY STATING WHETHER OR NOT HE /SHE AGREES WITH THE OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ORIGINAL GEOTECH ENGINEER. 23: FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS , SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND SUPPORTING DATA SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOULD THERE BE EXCEPTIONS TO THE ORIGINAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 24: THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL MONITOR , DURING CONSTRUCTION, COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, PATICULARLY SITE EXCAVATION, SHORING, SOIL SUPPORT FOR FOUNDATIONS INCLUDING PILES, WALL DRAINAGE SUBDRAINAGE INSTALLATIONS, SOIL COMPACTION AND ANY OTHER ASPECT OF THE CONSTRUCTION, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL MAKE WRITTEN, DATED MONITORING REPORTS ON THE PROGRESS OF THE CONSTRUCTION TO THE CITY IN A TIMELY MANNER, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL SPECIFY TYPE OF WALL BACKFILL MATERIAL AND INSPECT PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL MATERIAL. 25: ANY OMISSIONS OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE CITY AND SUBMITTED AS A REVISION FOR CITY REVIEW AND /OR APPROVAL, 26: A FINAL GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION MONITORING REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND SHALL CONTAIN A STATEMENT FROM THE GEOTECH ENGINEER THAT, BASED UPON HIS OR HER PROFFESIONAL OPINION , SITE OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING DURING MONITORING OF THE CONSTRUCTION, THE COMPLETED DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLES WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ALL GEOTECHNICAL- RELATED PERMIT CONDITIONS, doc: Conditions MI02 -038 Printed: 04- 03.2003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431.3670 27: PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, CONTRACTOR PERFORMING THE WORK NEEDS TO SUBMITS A PERFORMANCE BOND FOR 150% OF CONSTRUCTION COST AND $1 MILLION INSURANCE NAMING THE CITY OF TUKWILA AS ADDITIONAL INSURED, 28: CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA BUSINESS LICENSE, I hereby certify that I have read these conditions and will comply with them as outlined. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be compiled with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other work or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. Signature: Print Name: _ Gp ° r. (0 ,/ Date: doc: Conditions M102.038 Printed: 04.03.2003 1 CITY OF T 'KWI LA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Mi`c c�ll��l�c�clil� P('rniil /\I)I)iic at ion Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile. Project Name/Tenant: N 1Lt. c. Qes •t- tkPAp. r a U•tt S 1-60—r r-4 c, City State/Zip: S i—i- Lkw(L-A'W °,b(E►, slue of Construction: , 3 a c , er L71.2 ax Parcel Number: S5`): c�z:. -av -zc 4 ob:Z�- Phone: ( ) Site Piddress : (49 03 IN-tA u2P,Av[ AV Pr�o�p"erty Owner: 17lLa!'a Irt:c iNu . Street Address: (tc�}1 IAA i. 1 Au4 S it- x..041.5 Phone: k4 t ; 5k41 City State/Zip: vwLu : A AA i qvazcr, Fax #: ( ) Contractor: iilc) N.> .... 0 Water 0 Sewer Phone: ( ) Street Address: City State/Zip: Fax #: ( ) Architect: Phone: ( ) Street Address: r. City State/Zip: Fax 1: ( ) E Ct?tciII4002ty 14 Pc.,G Phone: ( ` ,) . `: if 'j z i Address: vx, t S t CiCetS-tsnL s�3c,•,2 et; , S1' : S ? 11'1 �'1,� r,•,� A C) City State/Zip: Fax #: ( -1 ) "1.,.‘-' " C f " .sieet Person: V. ,- Phone: ( 'lth ) I esc- 4( L 5yyeeeett Address: �l to A 4CAtst t St s �L7'►'r`it t L46 �cri 10- - City State /Zip: Fax 1: ( •old►) 7 i' �� / • Description of work to be done (please be specific): 6Ltsit` 4110011~:✓+- nc,..t. At:-c.C51,4 Sr( , After u,-e w- Will there be storage of flammable/combustible hazardous material in the building? ❑ yes a no A h Mt of materials and :tor location on s rate 8 1/2 X 11: r lndlcatln uantltles 8 Material Sa/et Data Sheets Above Ground Tanks Antennas/Satellite Dishes Bulkhead/Docks Commercial Reroof ❑ Demolition ❑ Fence ❑ Manufactured Housing•Replacoment only ❑Pad Lcin ots aRetainin . Wails ❑ Tim s ors Facilities ❑ Tree Cuttln P���' •� S'r AT- rr�I -rn 7.7171;nellzatlort/Striping ❑ Flood Control Zone ❑ Landscape Irrigation ❑ Storm Drainage ❑ Water Meter /Exempt If_„ 0 Water Meter /Permanent ❑ Water Meter Temp 0 0 Miscellaneous Curb cut/Accuss/Sldewalk Fire Loop/Hydrant (main to vault)N: Size(s): __,•, Land Altering : "Cutcubic yards trF III •„__cubic yards 0 K. (t.gradlneclearing Sanitary Sido Sewer 0: •°" ❑ Sewer Main Extension —5 Private 0 Public ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public Size(s): 0 Deduct 0 Water Only 0 ,_,a,.. Size(s): Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Moving Oversized Load/Hauling Schedule: Value of Comgnrction • In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Itteview • Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended mote than once. Date application accepted: Date application expires: Mucpsmcdoc Application taken by: (initials) 2 it4t, .� -- t { T.!%i. •:.:� iii ri ��r .. �ti • N..t.. 1`.:it3 i '' ` ik f F t �ij Y1' 1 Name: t III ItA. V4'tt,. Phone: Add iM4- FA ►..a1ft-ALA RNt•' ..,(r u-' t_ 3 w„4j 8A1AA)t Clty /Sta e/ZIp: iilc) N.> 0 Water 0 Sewer ,l• 0 Metro 0 Standby Value of Comgnrction • In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Itteview • Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended mote than once. Date application accepted: Date application expires: Mucpsmcdoc Application taken by: (initials) • ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN 0.0fIVCpiAND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED D ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT • STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER > CIVIL/SITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER (P.E.) ri,, tit It\lII \I'll I( \ II( \ \'.I)Rt()t Itlti)1 III( INI ' 1Otit)tt'WI RI\ II \ ` ; 'Gi 1'�T kdiW ,,linkk� Sup�iortePd'directly upon:gra"de `'Subm�i c t . o. M -9° -�e'�t��" ��' t...hhckli3� ' N �`} ` g ,000 gallb i�s''landra ratio ;�f;`.height•to'd,amefer.'or width`which • V...ilr 4 iii.i. �. 0 kA 001) /SafeII1ttrtl3iitli l -` Submit checklist; No 'M -1 •Phone: (4 ) d7�IltliIDoCfC t i r' t x ' C i tyaem cz / p Submit checklist No::M-10 0 c rI1 lt+ci$I'l roof a r Y , Subn iit checklist .N6: M4, CI n.er! 11 [j .Submit checklist' Nei: , M-9: O iti" =Hight= :'. kli §t h o: 'Sukfr>1it:c eC -.N M =T C:1 4 °SU Iriy,t ilri�/Orl lil�i ' r i iNoeils 3L'T•4 I 1 • Submit checklist .No: M -2 O '-Mlirc ll in oUI RM001( :Pii ; . Submit checklist -,No: H =9 El M100f4004e 140,01 ic(ItEP )NSIGNIA ON 4y):•-:. L 'Submit checklist Nor M -5 CI Movi Ot i!edtl'o &H*tili tt' =4%*.. . :Submit checklist No: M•5 0 Ra *i k tot!: :Submit checklist No: M4 _ f'� V� R+ ta'n's �WIli c ;4 ih height. a ♦ f r `" :Submlt.checkllst.:No: M 71+ �4t. •-^•r>r- l. •. r �SUbrriit�checkli #ti No :, M•y i- Ail, a 1 +I� `�� "'%r -"TT< .,,y A ;4P 4 3Y < ji, 7` '1 ,, }•. fr-+ii k �Z it . s iji ' #� /x I. ;++-'. ii i .� +% t +� ry +I� !� . .l' a .; ,. i'! .: fhtr'^" '..s! S. f. '!IG '�i'♦S ,N� : 1 p Z E t'�Iw 1 a!'1�' ..i .c fr'4r -•' 4 e .t>, .tea. Yr..,� g } {! Y e ssr'l'...4 .t �f •-. 0 Current copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of applkation, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is Issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form W-4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". FtF ` �• r r: , , t . i:a: a .� h }r �x I NERDY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO OE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERIU IY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. t fi • i' T l.i L.^♦ " -.. i r ., 1 ' . r5.u. + .$ *9-"k, , - L MA. 0 NEM ibizAlniffipM1111111 Address: ` C) ofe_ic,t4tz0 a sk e. 30'l Date: 01, (if, 01, •Phone: (4 ) ',t ,t —yam, Fax 1: ('Lim • >r c ' C i tyaem cz / p w o 9/9/99 Nitupm doc City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431-3670 Parcel No.: 3597000020 Address: 14903 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Suite No: Applicant: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SHORING RECEIPT Permit Number: M102 -038 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 03/21/2002 Issue Date: Receipt No.: R020000401 Initials: User ID: Payee: KAS 1684 GRAN, INC, TRANSACTION UST: Amount Payment Amount: Payment Date: Balance: Type Method Description Payment Check 10092 ACCOUNT ITEM UST: Description Current Pmte 11555.94 Account Code PLAN CHECK - NONRES 000/345.830 din; Receipt 1,555.94 1,555.94 03/21/2002 03 :19 PM $2,398.25 Total: 1,555.94 ::;ioo 03121 9716 TOTAL 1000.94 Printed: 03.21.2002 ig City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No,: 3897000020 Address: Suite No: Applicant: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SHORING 14891 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Receipt No,: R03.00426 Initials: BLH User ID: ADMIN RECEIPT Permit Number: Status: Applied Date: Issue Date: Payment Amount: Payment Date: Balance: M102.038 PENDING 03121/2002 2,731.60 04/03/2003 12:12 PM $0.00 Payee: GRAN INC TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 5106 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description 2,731.50 Account Code Current Pmto BUILDING - NONRES INBP FEE - STORM DRAIN INBP FEE - UTILITY LAND ALTERING PERMIT FEE LAND ALTERING PLAN CHECK PLAN CHECK - UTILITY STATE BUILDING SURCHARGE 000/322.100 412/342.400 000/342.400 000/322.100 000/345.830 000/345.830 000/386.904 2,393.75 15.00 30.00 209.00 49.25 30.00 4.50 Total: 2,731.50 7 ,)4/04 1716 'VITAL 273i.50 doc: Receipt Printed: 04. 03.2003 1 ENGINEERIUG Client: PLLC Revised Structural Calculations at HILLCREST APARTMENTS SEATTLE, WA Helen Ing Investments c/o Lowell Ing 1522 Alewa Drive Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817 USA Contact Keith Grisham Tel (206) 329 0085 Structural and Civil Engineers opyt 17 012 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 285-4512(V) (206) 285.0618(F) rthompsonectengineeting.cont CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED DEC -' 2 22 WILU iCfr. ciTMEMILA MAR 2 1 2002 PERMIT CENTER Am oa-on • dr.': if rt.' 0. '0. FR t'OE.!. Protect: Client: +11i51S;3 Date: (13(4:)1 180 Nickerson St. Suite 31)2 Seattle. WA 98109 12061 285.4512 FAX: rage Number: 1'()f ii 285.0618 OP 1 e- h4lOiiim 8 tt 4l4" / Lb xs) x a 4. 1- 14-rvir 44.0 4111.10644C4......1* 11•044-cic, 1.4.11a1.14. a sip* ,4•444- 41 it. /)-44 Aorertf lP�f. 11. —14-a-tvel 0-1—velrkes 0, Vale— ® 0,4-1 Q74) cev-t" Structural Eneirteers ■ Geotech Soil Distribution Pressures Line Load Distr. Data : 5.Oct -01 Formula sigma(h) = ( OL1H )'(1.28'm"2'n)/((mA2 +nA2) "2) W 29 ft m 0.088 ('0.4) ap � 2.50 KLF n SI math} Styth}/ft Rea n_ _. 0.01 0,0012 0,000343 0.000 0.1 0.0118 0.030212 0,088 0,2 0.0217 0.083082 0,388 0.3 0,0205 0.085574 0.744 0.4 0.0345 0,099954 1.159 0.5 0,0388 0.108857 1.547 0.8 0,0389 0.107140 1.884 0.7 0.0358 0,103204 2.095 0.8 0.0333 0,008527 2.239 0.9 0.0305 0.088445 2.308 1 0.0278 0,079904 2.317 .861 K/ft /Run 0,2 0.4 0.6 01 Rome pirfool H ■ 3.6 ft m • 0.1 (00.4) Op • 6.00 K f n 1- 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0,6 0.0 0,7 0.6 0.9 1 $Igma(h) Igth)/ Roe n 0.1115 0.9866 1.4286 1.3714 1.1101 0.6498 0.8340 0.4734 0.3571 0.2733 0.2123 0.003901 0.311419 0.500000 0.480000 0.390026 0,297442 0.221603 0.165680 0.126000 0,095653 0.074310 0.000 0.109 0.360 0,504 0.547 0.521 0.466 0.408 0.350 0.301 0,260 Total • 2.686 0.409 Tot Force 2.666 KM /Run Lino Load 8igma1 0.2 0,4 0.0 0.0 Porte per toot ▪ 0 oy34, i0 • k & 1§ 145 C T Project:, Client: E t't' G r! W E E`. 1 fir +Ic.S2.A, Date: (cc' • Page Number: P-2, 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle. %NA 95109 42061 285.451_ AN: 5'1161 285.0618 i S PA I441.A QAtsf..A1A.0 416 c� L A ' VIA 86+ A./ PAAt oI91l 0 ,CP4.4- O, 83" ' {„ , 161"-4-4 /1141 .AAAAA,±4-1. A4%44 trupp4k4.4,4 1 cam%' C4/44,4A q tA4 Z 514' 4e,,* 11)17 11* - nr C) 4v` p,p c5.y,,%•4;"4. 61 114,4-42t. 2 (vt ek sn: r4. ‘5%rrt3.4 PLOW.. arrret, 5$ p �ePA yuat 03:4./1 • 220,0 ct$12 0-4.4c - rtmt (A,,) l 'e■4.. t la) i4,441:11ui +03pc4 Ski lil. Structural Engineers 1 W ig protect: Client: Date: (ol oi 161 180 `icl:erstrn St. Suite 31)2 Seattle, %VII 98109 f206, 2S$.431' Page Number:. I'106 285 -0618 Structural Engineers • t i • .z .X solution: t.0 1. Deal; Perm loads ember Bending Moments (K•ft) section units are K and MI 1 CT Engineering P.L.L.0 i } i RTN 1 1 98183 Hillcrest Apartments 'October 18, 2001 2 :48 PM tb•03.r2d - Company Designer Job Number CTf Engineering P.L.L.C. 98183 Hillcrest Apartments Global 1Steel Code I AISC 9th Edition ASD !Allowable Stress Increase Factor (ASIF) i 1.333 Include Shear Deformation i Yes No. of Sections for Member Calcs 15 Redesign Sections IYes fP -Delta Analysis Tolerance i 0,50% Materials General Material Label Young's Modulus Shear Modulus Poisson's Thermal Coef. Weight Density Yield Stress (Ksi) (Ksi) Ratio _ _(per Ws 5 F) - — t 493)__.T—_-1Ksi) -- -- - 29000 11154 __ . _ -- �. -___ 36 __ -- October 18, 2001 2:48 PM Checked By:._ OC STL Section Database Material Area SA SA I (00,270) 1(0,180) TIC Labe! Shape . Label . (In)A2 -(0,180) (90,270) (InA4) (1_04) Only SEC1 '�C2 "._.._..i W18X86 • STL 25.3 1.2 1,2 � 175 � 1530 , - _ —" .-t 1 _.- ._. '. 1.2 I 1.2 1 1 i� 1 _.._ 1,2 1,2 ` 1 _ Join! Coordinates s Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature .�(2 o) fl .5 i Bounder, Conditions Joint Label X Translation Y Translation Rotation Reaction Res 3 ,� �� R _ .._ 2A j I Reaction i.. Member Data Section End R ©looses End Offsets Inactive Member Member Label I Joint J Joint Rotate Set I-End J•End I•End J.End Code Length (dogma) . AVM AVM .� AVM _r (In)-__,_ (in) (Ft) 1 '.a_ N1 ► N2A I SEC1- M4 1 N2 _- `1 3 M -N2A f J2 --� tr ._.... : SEC1 I _ - 17 i 9 -" /NiS a Member Section Length Lb out Lb in Lome Label Set Is out le in le band K out K in CH Cm � f M1 SEC1 9 --(F!) (Ft) �Fq 1. 1, 1 -- I M4 , SEC1 1 5 1 i 1. 1. I M3 SEC1 17 .. 1. • 1. Cb Sway 8 out in RISA -20 Version 5.1e [C: \Prograrn Files\ Risa2D \Projects198183 \tb- 03.r2d] Page 1 Ithqi , Company Designer Job Number CT Engineering P.L.L.C, RTN 98183 Hilicrest Apartments October 18, 2001 2:48 PM Checked Sy: edesi • n Criteria Section Set Max Depth Min Depth Max Width Min Width (In) Ofq SEC1 19 12 18 Max Code Check Min Code Check Distributed Load Patterns Pattern Label Direction Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location End Location (K/ft, 5) (KM, 5) _ (.5 t 0 r Vo_ ) _(t or %) X ' -1 i -1 0 0 ' -1 1- 0 0 1 L 0 0 Y r 1 UNIFORMX UNIFORMY TRIANGLE •1 0 Bas BascL.aa Ca e Data BLC No, Basic Load Case Category Descri non Code Category Descri tIon Gravity Y Load Type Totals Nodal Point Diet. Earth loads None t • • : : , 1 1 2 - , i • := • .1 • • • • • • I L".. Joint Lobel Mond or Direction Magnitude [011splace_ment N2A .80._ Member Label I Joint J Joint Direction Magnitude Location K•tt).____AFt dr %)__ - N1 N2A Y ' Amber 00_0_ _ = M1 • 1 .-: L, • 1, 4! ' I Joint J Joint __Load Pattern Lobel _Pattern Multiger, N1 N2A UNIFORMX 5 N2A N2 UNIFORMX 5 j JlauktraigaulailefflrdistacalLeatAkaLlsiuzakeadat......... _Member Labet I Jeint. Joint Load Pattern Label Pattern Multiplier M1 Ni N2A UNIFORMX 1.43 „. N2A 1 UNIFORMX 1,43 1 msaibgrsktagLestuyi§sd2ggajxaus.,.,IBLc. irc ar e Load Member Label I Joint J Joint Load Pattern Label Pattern Multiplier M1 Ni N2A UNIFORMX .22 M3 N2A UNIFORMX .22 e BLC Passive Loads Member Label I Joint J Joint Load Pattern Label Pattern Multiplier M4 N2 r N3 TRIANGLE 11.3 41111MINMININIMII•1111 4110•11111111111k VONNIIIN• RISA-2D Version 5.1e [CAProgram Files\Risa2D1Projects\98183\tb-03.r2d1 Page 2 InNommminmo._ Company Designer Job Number CTEngineering P.L,L.C. 98183 Hillcrest Apartments October 18, 2001 2:48 PM Checked By: Load Combinations Num _ _ De__scription____� 1 1- ( Basic Perm Toads Env WS PD SRSS CD 1 2 1 All incl Seismic y 1 Joint Ibis __ BLC_ Factor Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 i 4 -T- - - -- - f - - -1 - -- i i i 1 1 1 4 j 1 I 3 i 1 lacements LC 1 Basic Perm loads 2 �1 1 Joint Label X Translation Y Translation (in) (in) N1 1 -0.083 1 0.000 i ,� N2A 0.000 ( 0,000. i N2 •0,183 __i_ 0.000 1 N3 0.000 0.000 , , on LC ' B Joint Label sic ' e t Loads Rotation (radians) 0,001 1 -0.001 0,002 0.003 T1 X Forco Y Force Moment (K) (IQ (_K-ft), -1.433 1 0.000 _ 0.000 C©nter of Gravity Coorda (X,Y) : No Calculation Redeslan Shaves. LC 1 : B�aslc, Perm loads Section Mombor Current Set EC 1 Lobol Choice 1st Coie - t _18X76 Suggested Alternate Shapes _2nct�Cholce _ -_ _ - ,_3rr� Coic @.. __ ..�.. •tth Cholco, _l _16X77 .. �MWI8X88 HP14X89 Material Takeoff, LC 1 : Basic Perm loads ,•■,■ section Sot Database Shape Totol Length Total Weight (Et) (K) .... _. E 1C i W18X88 31 1669 SEC2 T- 0.000 1 0.000 r~' SECS i 00 00 F r 1 : o ds Member Label Section Axial Shear Moment K K WI) ______T-71 i 0 0 2' ..- 0 1 - 11.745 - 13.213 3- . 0 1 -23.49 52.852 4 i 0 - 35.235 ' 118.918 -+ 5 ' 0 -46.98 i ` 211.41 M4.. - 1 i 0 -26.817 - 86.999 N i 2 I m . 0 . - 25.051 54.214 3 .I 0 i - 19.754 - 25.843 I - 10.926 -6.301 4 0 5! 0 i 1.433 1 0 M3 _ 1 0 61.923 211.41 2 i 0 39.738 r -4.622 3 0 17.553 T - 126.367 4 1 0 -4.632 , - 153.826 5 1 0 - 26.817 - 86.999 1 RISA -2D Version 5.1e (C; \Program Files \Risa2D \Projects \98183 \tb- 03.r2d] Page 3 r Company : CT Engineering P.L,L.C. Designer : RTN Job Number : 98183 Hilicrest Apartments October 18, 2001 2 :48 PM Checked By: .i ember Stresses LC 1 ; Basic Perm loads Member Label M1 Section Axial (Ksi) 0 .. . M4 �..... M3___. «-u•. •. Member Label 1 2 3 0 0 4 1 0 5 _1 0 _. 11 0 2. 0 ... 3_._1....0 0 0 Shear Bending top Bending bot (Ksi) (Ksi) (Ksi) 0 0 i 0 -1.597 -0.953 0.953 -3.193 -3,812 I 3.812 -4,79 -8.576 i 8.578 -6.387 - 15.246 a .15.246 - 3.646 6.274 i - 6.274. -3.406 3.91 1 -3.91 _. -2.685 .... j._ . 1.864 . -1.864 - 1.485_..1 0.454 I. -_ -0.454 0.195 I 0 •t 1 .,_i... _ 0 F 8.418 L- 15.246 s 15.246 2, 0 ' 5.402. 0.333 1 -0.333 3 i ...0. 2.386 , .9.113 1 . - 9.113 4. , ..... _ 0 •0.63 _1 11.094 ,1 { -3.646 1 6.274 1 -6.274 u • • Section *Translation yTranalation (n) L/y Ratio lInt llnl E----M1 1 0 -0.083 t 1302.276 0 0 i ■•t).049_ l - 793 .2225 - 0.017 #6296.794 . • i 0 e 03 f40 • 1 1 1 -1 u4 1 I • 1 3 f N. • 1 IC _ 0 1 • . 6 I 3 1 2 ' 0 i i 1 -0.111 1 3107.566 , 3 i 0_ 1 .0.225 I 1527.307 0_, 7:7710,255 T 1726.953.-1 ' •0.183 -- - =C i w • 5 1� . 0 P Member Label Coda Chk Loa Shear Chk Loa Fa Ft Fb ASD Eqn, ‘„(Ft).,_ . _ (F.() _ (Kpi) (Kei) - -(Kai) ,,�,,� <� MI 1 0.642 1 ._. 9 .■ ,0.44 9 1 19,104 21.6 i 23.76 1 H1-2 --WIZ- _. __ - - + 0.264 i 0,.._. -1-0,253 .., _.0_w_... ;_.. 20.424 21.6 _ Tr' ,..23.76 f H1.2 ., M3 1 0.706..1 .. 0=. -1- 0,585.1 0 ' ,15.624. �..._- 21.6 ! 21.6 H1 -2 RISA -20 Version 5,1e CC: \Program Files \Risa2D \Projects \98183 \tb- 03.r2dj Page 4 K Project: Eltp 11:1% ER e , PLLO .*9l -4.g Client: Date: Page Nurnbcr: 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 1205 285.4312 FAX: !'n6t285.0618 .9c`' I' 45' et4P4 ; 1 �t xt w01. 0, G,N Q 14-4A-44 i ©4t1 ks 404k / M wt LV tS, K it 4) ,c71-t..) c G 510 t2 )lw► p-& 1 b, @.-' o')') ©lo . a(iq c', , W:° I 1 Let 0 quo � kel . ttri LT, w I,n. !t". 1� r 4,04 ) Structural Engineers ti 1 Solution: LC 2. ind seismic rrobqr Sanding Momenta (K-tt) action units are K and K.ft CT Engineering P.L,L.C. I RTN 198183 115.1 Hillcrest Apartments !October 19, 2001 112:54 PM tb-04.r2d ■111•11=1■11111■111•11111...... • t , Company : CT Engineering P.L.L.C. Designer : RTN Job Number : 98183 Hilicrest Apartments October 19, 2001 12:55 PM Checked By: Global (Steel Code i AISC 9th Edition ASD Allowable Stress Increase Factor (ASIF) 1 1.333 I Include Shear Deformation No. of Sections for Member Gales ! 5 !Redesign Sections Yes FP-Delta Analysis Tolerance • 0.50% Yes Materials (General\ Material Label Young's Modulus Shear Modulus Poisson's Thermal Coef. Weight Density Yield Stress .Ksi) (_Kai) Ratio (per 10"5.0- _ - -- (K/ft"3) _(Ksi) -___ STL I 29000 1 11154 1 .3 i .65 .49 ____I 50 Sections Section Label SEC1 SEC2 Database Material Area SA SA I (90,270) I (0,180) Shape - , ... _ __ Label (Inj "2 gum (90,270J. (ln "4-) . ( A4J W18X106 STL r 31.1 1 1.2 i 1.2 I 220 1_ .1910. ,.., STL 1 r 1.,2 ! 1.2 ..1 ._v.- 1 - ' - 1 - I STL -., ; -m1- _.- ._.. _ _ I ..1.2. 1. 1.2 _ .. _ _1 .1 _1 _____ Jo/nt Coordlnetes Joint Label X Coordinate Y Coordinate Joint Temperature (O -._�. ��.r. 2t3� _ 0 -r- �...� Joint Label X Translation Y Translation Rotation �C/i•n� f�Klinj _IK•ftilad) f 3 Reaction ! Reaction - -N2A React on I____e_@, Section End Releases End Offsets Inactive Member Member Label I Joint J Joint Rotate Set I•End J•End I•End J.End Code Length (degrees)_„T _.T AVM AVM (In) -(1 --, (F . . i SEC1 — SEC1 ,� t ! ._... 1 ._.. 7 22 M4. T N .. - (V1.. .._.,..... 2A . -� N2 =-1 3 192A -_Jggl a ,, / ND Parameters Section Length Set Member Label (FF M1 SEC1 4 M4 r SEC1 ± 7 M3 �._ SEC1 22 SEC1 Lb out Lb in L_comp le out le in le_bend (Ft) (Ft) (Ft) ,— 1 1. ' 1. I ?- 1. 1. r i 1 1 I- j 1. 1. , i , K out Kin Cb Sway CH Cm 8 out in RISA -2D Version 5,1e (C :\Program Files \Risa2D \Projects \98183\tb- 04.r2d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number CT Engineering P.L,L.C. 98183 Hillcrest Apartments October 19, 2001 12 :55 PM Checked By: rtedesian Criteria Section Set Max Depth Min Depth Max Width Min Width Max Code Check Min Code Check (in) (In) (In) (In) SEC1 ; 19 12 18 8 .95 Distributed Load Patterns Pattern Label Direction F-- UNIFORMX 1 X UNIFORMY 1 Y TRIANGLE ! X Start Magnitude End Magnitude Start Location 5nd Location (Kitt, F) (K/ft, F) Lt or %) (Ft or %) -1 I -1 _i 0 ! 0� -1 0 j 1 ± - 0 -- —:_- -- - 0 -1 Basic Load Case Da a BLC No, Basic Load Case Category Category Gravity Load Type Totals Description Code Description X Y Nodal Point Dist 1 1 i Earth Toads . None 1 .L 1 2 1 . . . 2 1 Seismic Loads None i I........ _ ..l ! . _ _ _1. _..... . _ ..._ v.2 .._. 1 3 Surcharge Loads - Ndrte ..l.- . .�. ... .. ..1 . i. �.�i , .. - 2 4 Passive Loads None I __. ! 1 -._ _'. _ . ___.. ....! .... -1_.� - 5 Vert TB Loads I None ._ _ _..' i ` 1 • 1 • s • _1 • c. 1 -. , =/1=1 -'•I • !I Joint Label (L)oad or [D]Ieglogomont Direction B =L B Magnitude L Y -80 Aember Polnf Loads, Cateaory : None, jaing..1 2 Earthlosds Member Label • _ 1 I Joint J Joint Direction Magnitude Location 0 - _11.11.- -s -LI< •ft), �_. -1Ft 0 MI i - A Membbr Label I Joint_ _ m _1111._ M3 -_FN2A _-- ___1111. II =U • - J Joint ,- Load Pattern Label Pr_Itern Multiplier N2A ; UNIFORMX ._,� UNIFORMX._.....- 11_11 6 41 MembprLabel I Joint J Jalnt Load Pattern Label Pattern Mullipll ®r M'1 N1 N2A UNIFORMX__.. - -_ _ -- -1.43 _- __M3......... -. 1.... 1111 N2A �N2 UNIFORMX r 1,43 i MemI er Dlstributed Loads. Cateaory : None, BLC 3 : Surcharae Loads Member Label I Joint J Joint Load Pattern Label Pattern Multiplier. M1 � N1 N2A UNIFORMX 1 .22 M3 I N2A N2 UNIFORMX T .22 „ l� jifember Distributed Loads, Catesory :None, BLC 4 : Passive Loads Member Label ( M4 I Joint J Joint Load Pattern Label - Pattern Multiplier, N2 N3 TRIANGLE 14.75 RISA -20 Version 5.1e (C: \Program Files \Risa2D \Projects \98183 \tb- 04.r2d] Page 2 0§ ts g a TtE Og Company Designer Job Number CTEngineering P.L.L.C, 98183 Hlllcrest Apartments Load Combinations October 19, 2001 12:55 PM Checked By: Num Description Env WS PD SRSS CO BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 1 Basic Perm loads j 1 1 1 ; 1 1 L 1 I 4 1 1' 3 1 j 12 1 Inc' seismic 1 1 y i 1 ! 1 1 ' 1 i 4 i 1 r 3 1 1 j___ 2 1 i 1 1 Joint D s lace ents LC 2 : inci seismic Joint Label X Translation Y Translation Rotation (In) (In) (radians) N 1 0.599 1 0.000 1 -0,013 j N2A . 0,000 1 0.000 I •0.013 N2 • , -0.931 1 0.000 . J 0.009 . �... N3 0.000 .J , 0,000 J. ..0.011. Reactions, LC 2 : Inc! seismic Joint Label X Force Y Force Moment - —I-0.000 6.87 1 000 T Conter of Gravity Coords (X.Y) : No Celcuiation Section Member Current Suggested Alternate Shapes e`�_ — M3 ' Yea 18X106 _ .!_ W14)109 H P1 4X117 ,i W1 8 11o9 - �{ .._ Looj _ _Chp)co_ _: i s _Choice ___....__ C cite_ . 34Chaico__.__ 4h C Material_rakeoff. LC 2 : lncl seismic ___„a..... Section Sot Database Shape Total Length Total Weight _An)._ (K)_ __.__}__ -. (SEC1 7 W18 (bU fl w 33 1 ______.3.492.___ ^_ E_SEC2 _____ 1 O'000 -O,QOd _. .i EC3 __.__._ . ,�1... _ _ ,. _ _.... •, i 0,000 0.000 otaIW_ights : s _.. - __ Member Sectio, For�,es Member Label Section Axial Shear Moment _-(K) (K) (K•tt) ....e...... M1 r _. i 0 0 T 0 2 0 ! .6.65 3,325 .. _ 3 0 . -13.3 rt-- 13.3 ^' 4 0 - -19.95 1 29.925 5 0 i -26.6 53.2 M4 1 0 i _.- 57.812 j , 284.228 0 - 54.586. - 184.939 0 - 44.906 1 - 96.942 4 0 - 28.773 - 31.532 5 0 f -6.187 1 0 M3 1 0 88,488 53.2 2 0 1 51.913 - 332.901 3 0 15.338 - 517.839 4 0 r - 21.237 . - 501.615 5 0 i .57.812 - 284.228 RISA -2D Version 5,1e [C: \Program Files\ Risa2D \Projects198183 \tb- 04.r2dj Page 3 ti t Company Designer Job Number CT Engineering P.L.L.C, 98183 Hiilcrest Apartments October 19, 2001 12:55 PM Checked By: fialember Stresses LC 2 : Intl seismic Member Label M1 Section M4 1 2 3 Axial (Ksi) 0 0 Shear Bending top Bending bot (KO (Ksi) LKSt) 0 0 L 0 j -0.722 -0,196 ' 0.196 -1.444 -0.783 0.783 4 0 -2.166 -1,761 1.761 1 0 0 -2.889 -6.278 '... -3.13 16,723 3.13 - 16.723 2 0 . -5.927 10.881 , - 10.881 3 4 0 . 0 - 4.876 - 3.125. 5,704 _ 1.855... -5.704 .. -1.855 0 i. . 0 -0.672 0 1 ..... ,_ 0 .9.609 _ -3.13 _ 3.13 2 0 5,637 19,587 30.468 - 19.587 - 30.468 . 1 0.� 1.666 4 0 -2.306 29.514 - 29.514 - 16.723 5 0 -6.278 16.723 Mem er Deflections. LC 2 : lncl selsm_lc ,_ Member Label Suction *Translation •Transletion (n) L/y Rollo t M 1 0.599_ _ NC 37.993.. .0 2 Q 43,989 i. _ . H 1.2 0 45 1 C 3 0 0 0.3 1■Td 35.93 i X9.99 . 43,989 0.151 i. . I 13.444 1 0.36 0 19.831 _ 39.99 1 34.058 i H1.2 - w_MINIO 5 . 1 -0 717 45_, =91. 0 • :; _ . 4 '7.R OM ., 44 _ 72 I 0 + °1 1 -0.807 -1,316 459.488-a ' 310.289 i 2 0 0 - 4_,_L. _5 ' 0 ' -1.53 I -0,931 .403.583 i. NC Member AISC ASD 9th Code Checks. LC 2 : Jncl seismic Member Label Code Chk Loa Sheer Chk Loo (Ft) ( ) Ft Fa Kat Ft <ai Fb Kai ASD Eqn, M . __._...._..__• - I .,_ 0.071 i - Q.108 ' 4 ; 37.993.. f -S9.99 ^ ...' 43,989 i. _ . H 1.2 M4 ... %9.38 0 0.235 0 35.93 i X9.99 . 43,989 1 * H1-2 M3 0.925 I 13.444 1 0.36 0 19.831 _ 39.99 1 34.058 i H1.2 RISA -2D Version 5.1e [C :\Program Files\ Risa2D \Projects198183\tb- 04.r2d) Page 4 ti C T PtoJeCt: Client: E N: G (: N E E R l; N G ". C Date: 180 Nickerson St. State .302 Seattle. OVA 98109 t 22061 285-4512 r.ax: Page Number. (206) 285.0618 L.7„-vit : U ,�: ift I gtec , MEWS iv-L.& ry /dr-, ,5! iv jkyt,. 4— en-4z a ÷- �'�- ''' -Q.� � -rote/6. • • CIO a 44104 •f Qc.\ -. 12x at f• >4), 5°)0 4 9 If', 2 •4 6 - '%>> N t.0 �.. Structural Engineers t Drainage Calculations Structural Engineers 301 !. Drainage Calculations for Hillcrest Apartments - Shoring City of Tukwila, Washington Project No. 2781 Prepared For: Lowell lug 1682 Kalakaua Avenue, Suite 4 Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 �'"Ex:�iRES ai3oioi October 21, 1999 401 Rev: 144. t' , zoo ° c.) Murray Tobiason, Inc. Land Use Planning • Civil Engineering • Structural Engineering • Landscape Architecture 8625 Evergreen Way, Suite 104 • Everett, Washington 98208.2620 • Phone: 425.513.2500 • Fax: 425.355.1307 1)1 10 ( ( 0 l ' iT/' )1 )1 fi,.,�� f 4 =1( 1 It 1I '1 1' V /OI ) :.! 111" 1 j'1 ( /'0001 I Gil 00 if (iI /I11 01 t.IUl.'li1 Af'P,f113��t t� VA, 06 pp or. 1 1'1110;14V 1 rAtt!f, l A:41.1'1 `f I %lh''/ I', I opt ) O.l?, b'Ic- _lP,1e, I; " n:1 ei Ile- (:y,t)I L, : /1(.1,0411.: 11 `(I,)(1,01 r't!rt ;:: 14'v01-' (_ PLINIOW: 41 16 r/'tvN W /I1111'100i.'l' C, ',I."I: /I 111 °Ir'i It L. & : 0.1 C I :- /00 Ye or en 'II II ( ►1I r'i I (II 141)Ivi t''( (, , 1 ;1(ol (1)('1 I 1 t "I /1(:K PL P0/ Or /0OY4' &, v 'I 7.1 oet- V DITCH CALC SIDE SLOPE" DEPTHog AREA PERIMETER= HYDRAULIC RADIUS= 0.188 SO FT 1,581 FT 0.119 FT MANNINGS n= 0,026 SLOPE= 0.005 FT /FT Qrz 0.183 CFS MUR_RAY - TOBIASON, INC. Planning • Civil Engineering • Landscape Architecture 626 128th Street Southwest, Suite 107 • Everett, Washington 98204.6368 Phone (206) 513.2500 ' Fax (206) 742.2822 OL i a/ 11 II^(r t tlil( t., i .<(1, 1 W1 I)l? 1' t 1 1 C /IPA, (. (I''( 0 14'I A1;:1 % t,' I I- I.'" I 1 I t'1 U. o12,, ao 15 '1. (. , 4,`13c(S Crip,lrl1Y Pt' /I - ►a 111iI04 1 11. (.. (!' 1. r,7 !11 Pil 11;)! (1 1► ; , - L'f(Ct ( ('%1 WL /IP -DUAL( Scale: f (ii 1 pate: "/z obi i Job No.: 2791 !if _By: 1 A Checked: Sheet of 4 I° 10/18/99 page 1 Hillcrest Apartments -- Shoring Drainage Calculations Ditch Basin BASIN SUMMARY BASIN ID: 100YR NAME: Ditch basin - 100yr storm SCS METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA 0.31 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TYPE TYPE1A PERV IMP PRECIPITATION 4.00 inches AREA..: 0.18 Acres 0.13 Acres TIME INTERVAL 10.00 min CN 76.00 98.00 TC 10.00 min 5.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 PEAK RATE: 0.18 cfs VOL: 0.06 Ac -ft TIME: 500 min s OWL 4V'E. 11H2,1-. ( LC' it( I,) (I114)10C M•it)'1Ut.v(;)E- (i +hour (,rllo1, &I1; /.7 Pn6L '3/00 11 /�1t_. ( 0.4(2. tie) = 1-.3 00 (I� 110/-1-) 1)1 4i1,11.(01 I Cl_ 21 S 2'tit Psi 1 L 130 k / MURRAY .- TOBIASON, INC. Planning • Civil Engineering • Landscape Architecture 626.126th Deal Southwest. Suite 107 • Everett. Washington 982046369 Phone (206) 519.2500 • Fax (206) 742.2622 1• 1 1 L 1 C r ti t" 01.1•01E-ti TG ;C_ Pot IG ca.Iui'InICI Scale: t.. 101, I E. By: I! Nn Date: 191 11 Checked: Job No.: 718 1 Sheet of it e • • •_p.' •I• I •. .t1 •�I 1 1 • 1•• 1 , •.1♦ •1 "It N {. '11:t001t11I(Y 3EI)1MLN'1' PONDS - NOMOGItl►1'JI ]. TYPE 1A 5'1'0101 AREA 1. . 1 ,1. , •I. � 1 • I ,.i•+ •1 .11;1 .,. 1' • •• / HMI .1�1 «.17 11' 11.11.1., .1 5 (11UtJOr C VOLUt1L ) • 4. it 1' t' 11 II • '1; 90- 65- 7S-I 0 5- �o- 5- . tvl 1:44 tQ a a ca E-+ 111 4.1 IIYI)ROLOGIC SOILS GROUP Solt, :.1 Y0►2b L OC.1G G,VJ.) P (, PtterAP' ?f Yv : 314'IA. Sio•tit• Volwwle • (ao FrstAc. • * BASED UPON A TIME OP CONCENTRATION OF .25 1111. Ntut'% " APA 'wtb17S -Si-102044 14 L 2'7e1 mo rQ.f2 Y - -T08ortiah4, taC. 1°1t q /qq IT20 6 -90 -85 -80 -75 -45 -55 0, 500- 100+0 /500 - 2oca- 25o0- 3000- 3 504' .5 1.0 1(UN 1000 - 4 Soo_ 5000- jI ifilicrest Apartments Shoring BASIN AMP ••••••M COmm.• 4,••• Wfl *meow ••••••• 4mm • •••••••■• IMM• Murray - Tobiason, Inc. lul krocaral fag% mil: latimpc 11•1•■••• I•m• 164 • Or ...mom WM MI 06.110.114• • •vw •Mm• " .• uso Ina No fhti . alase i. iv lir los 10' A... be ,.. 'ft j v EVERGREEN ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. LAND USE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING R. Alan Murray, P,E. Downstream Analysis Approximately half of the roof drainage of the northeast building of Hil!crest Apartments flows easterly down the slope (See Plate 1, next page) to the drainage ditch along Interurban Avenue. The drainage flows northerly in the ditch (Plate 2) and enters an enclosed system and then crosses under Interurban Avenue, The flow outlets to a ditch (Plate 3) that runs northerly along the east side of Interurban Avenue and Is then picked up by a 38" pipe (Plate 4). This enclosed system runs under 144'" Street and outlets to the Green River (Plate 4). See the storm drainage map provided by the City of Tukwila, attached, for the downstream route. Since the development for this project Is not adding additional impervious surface, the runoff is not Increased. The flow patterns will remain the same as the existing flow patterns after construction, There are no vlsible problems downstream; therefore, it is our opinion that there will not be any adverse Impacts to the downstream system. 8625 Evergreen Way, Suite 104 • Everett, Washington 98208.2620 • Phone: 425.513.2500 • Fax: 425.355.1307 ••1 • i . - .. - i , . .._ A ,, \ 1 i 1;,,;.‘c IL : ..7.41.41! ':+:::‘‘i4°.11' '' ' I1 ) ti," !! - , , ),'1 I.! L i , % /. 1. I • H/; i y .4 1 , 1 liti '1 . '‘, V, 1 , . - —It% c ' •, 1 .4 • . IP, ni ''1 '''l / 4 ji ii! 4 ' '''''''r ' 4 ' . I` ..11),f,t;.: ;• . \).'61 t ike: . ' 4 1 - ,i, • ' ' .4":, LI '1 ,, / , ‘s I 1 •' ' illifi! s''' .4 '' 7111 .i ......- , 11 'f?Pi 1' J , - , • 1 L47,11' I l ) ....,,,k ‘ A , 1 1 .1 . I. , ''...; 4'. ' ,e'. I '— ?,4' , , • 4,i,, - t ,• A • :441 is‘4 6%44i:4 1):$1142 Plate 1 — Half of roof drainage from this Hillcrost Apartments building flows down this slope and into the Interurban Avenue drainage ditch. .n4r-vr ON e Plate 2 — Drainage flows along ditch and .f:441:4: • .• . r5iij..- ._,- .J -i +, 4''4 Plate 3 — Drainage outlets into a ditch that runs northerly along the east side of Interurban Avenue. f!( :T pjj�(�r• tiK • Plate 4 -- Ditch Drainage is collected by a 36" pipe and is conveyed down 144 Street where it outlets into the Green River. �j�li�4GN .H.ilicrest Apartments Shoring DOWNSTREAM NAP •I wog O 1 Ise. W N7 (Ws.... f.u. a Mow* .1 0111 EVERGREEN ENGINEERING ^r •x-111 -1100 ,.. .i>- 713 -110, SERVICES INC. '"A"""m""" LAND PLANNING . CIVIL ENGINEERING 11111. MM Na 1•d1. W ►w.. NO I ■r..N IW sw. la ..p4 44 1110f Oft liasym R ti Geotechnical Review Letter Structural Engineers Feb 15 02 04:21p ) GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC 04251747 -8561 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen tog investments Limited Partnership 1622 Alewa Drive Honolulu, HI 96817 P.1 13256 Nonhcrut 20th Sue* t. suite 16 Bellevue. Washingtom 980Cr3 (425) 747 - 56100 PAX 1425)747 -$561 February 15, 2002 JN 98399 Attention: Lowell Ing Subject: Review of Plans Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wail Hllicrest Apartments 14891 interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: "Response to Third Party Review ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated August 3, 2001, regarding the subject site, 'Retaining Wall Design Parameters, Landslide Remediation ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc„ dated July 10, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Response to Third Party Review', by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated February 15, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Review of Plans — Geotechnical Concerns', by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated October 20, 2000, regarding the subject situ. Dear Mr. Ing: We have completed a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications for the landslide stabilization wall to be constructed at 14801 Interurban Way South in Tukwila. We have completed two previous reports related to the subject site. An initial Geotochnical Engineering Study for a landslide stabilization wall was completed on July 12, 1995, and a second Geotechnical Engineering Study for a Shoring/Landalide Stabilization Wall was completed on November 5, 1998. During the review process, we made recommendations to the structural engineer regarding changes to the plans. Those changes were incorporated Into the anal set of plans that we reviewed. The plans we reviewed included Sheets SS1, SS2, and C1 through C3. CT Engineering prepared the structural plane, which are dated October 31, 2001, and Evergreen Engineering Services, Inc. prepared the civil engineering plans, which are dated January 31, 2001. in our judgement, the plans conform to the recommendations in our geotechnical engineering reports and subsequent letters (references above). Our personnel should be onsite full time during soldier pile wall installation to monitor the soil conditions encountered and observed the installation technique. 1/2 lg Feb 15 02 04:21p GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership February 15, 2002 (425)747 -8561 We trust this letter fulfills your needs at this time, Please contact us with any qUestions or if we can be of further assistance, Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, Jo Senior Geot chnloel Engineer Ri4 8mee R. Finley, P.E. Principal cc; CT Engineering — Rob Thompson 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98100 Via facsimile: 208488.0818 JHS/JRF allskz p.2 JN 58399 Page 2 2/2 i Geotcchnical Response Letters Structural Engineers Feb 15 02 04:23p GCOTECH CONSULTANTS INC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 (425)747 -0561 p.1 11256 Nertheatt 20th Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. &is:iin4t,m 9S001 (425) 7:17.3618 FAX (425177 -8$61 JN 99399 August 3, 2001 Via facsimile: 206- 285 -0618 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Response to Third Party Review Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hillcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: "Retaining Wail Design Parameters, Landslide Remediation', by Gvotech Consultants, Inc., dated July 10, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Response to Third Party Review Comments..,', by Shannon and Wilson, Inc., dated May 16, 2001. Dear Mr. Thompson: As discussed at the meeting on July 28, 2001, we are preparing this letter to further address the wall design concerns raised by Shannon and Wilson in their previous letters. • In regards to the active pressure used for the wall design, we are recommending a uniform lateral active earth pressure of 35H be used In the design. In our opinion, this pressure considers all failure planes (shallow and deep) passing through the wall location from the top of the wail to the bedrock. We recommend Incorporating a surcharge of 10H Into the design to approximate the loading from seismically - Induced earth pressures. We understand that an Increase In allowable steel street) will be taken when applying these temporary pressures. In addition, the geotechnical values utilized for calculation of wall stability (passive pressure and anchor adhesions) Incorporate a factor of safety of 1.5. In our opinion, this safety factor can be reduced to 1.2 when considering the seismic loads. • The wall monitoring program recommended in our letter dated July 9, 2001 should be Implemented to monitor the long term performance of the wall. • The fill to be placed in front of the wall should be minimized from both an economic and a slope stability standpoint. The piling contractors should place fill only as needed to reach the tieback elevation. None of the additional fill should be left in place. As discussed at the meeting, the large depths of fill shown on the civil plans should not be placed. • For c :arity, a detail of proposed wail loading is attached to this letter, Feb 15 02 04:23p GEOTECH CONSULTANTS 1MC (4251747 -0561 Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnershipc% CT Engineering August 3, 2001 p.2 JN 98309 Page 2 We trust this letter clears up the remaining issues so that design and construction of the mitigation wall can take place, if you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us, Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. EXPIRES 01.31•_ JaIRes n. 'Strange, Jf.,�+.t, Senior Geotechnlcaf Engineer Attachment: Landslide Retention Wall Loading Detail JHS: alt X00 oilija co: Shannon and Wilson, Inc. — Attentlon: Gerard Buechel, P.E. - via facsimile (208) 9864777 Landslide Retention Wall Loading Detail 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington wawmommi Feb 15 02 04:23p Existing Grade (varies) Weathered Bedrock (approximate elevation 22 feet) GEOTECH CONSULTANTS INC 14251747-8561 H p•3 Ground Surface f f i 0 No Load Zone Locat• All Anchors Behind This Una milErrHhemiummale 800 Notes: D (10 min) t► 3111.1 MOD (psf ) Passive Pressure (psi) Active Prsesuro Tieback Anchors (embed anchors entirely In weathered bedrock) NOTE: Sae Report and Subsequent Letters For Additional Design Criteria and Considerations (1) The repots should be referenced for specifics regarding design and installation. The above allowable values Incorporate a safely factor of (1.5), (2) Active pressures act over the pile spacing. An additional uniform lateral pressure of 1 OH should be included when conducting a seismic analysis of the wall, (3) Posoive pressures act over twice tha yivuted soldier pits diameter or the pile spacing, whichever Is smaller, (4) It is assumed that no hydrostatic pressures act on the back of the shoring waVia. (5) Cut slopes. non•underptnned structures, or other walls positioned above or behind the stabilization wall will ex, art additional pleasures on iha shorin ' wall. ,Asir Affizto Daft AUG 2001 N.T.3. 1 PONSULTANTS, INC. 132{6 Northeast theast _20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, 1Vashin!Vrol 9500 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747•8561 July 10, 2001 JN 913309 Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98100 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Retaining Wall Design Parameters, Landslide Romediation Hilicrest Apartments 14891 interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference' 1). "Response to Third Party Review", Letter to Helen Ing by Geotech Consultants, Inc. dated February 13, 2001, 2). "Response to Third Party Review Comments,.." Letter by Shannon & Wilson to the City of Tukwila dated May 16, 2001. Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter is In further reply to review comments by Shannon & Wilson. Asa summary of the project, a landslide occurred In 1995 below the northeast building of the complex. We conducted a study of this slide at that time, but no repairs were made. Further soil movement has occurred since that time. We conducted another study of the site, drilling additional borings in the fall of 1998. Since about this time, the building, which is located near the scarp, has been unoccupied pending completion of a retaining structure and necessary building repairs. Delays have come from a variety of sources including significant delays in the City of Tukwila approval process. The 'request for a permit to the City of Renton and focus of our design effort Is to repair the landslide that has occurred and to stabilize the ground in front of the northeast building. We have not studied other slopes or any of the buildings in the complex including the slope In front of the southeast building. The proposed stabilization extends beyond the limits of the landslide and will protect the northeast building. The southeast, adjacent building has not been endangered by the present landslide, The proposed stabilization method is a tied back soldier -pile wall with the piles socketed into bedrock and the anchors embedded into bedrock. The design does not depend on development of the adjacent property and Is not intended to provide a retaining system for this development. We have assumed, however, that there is a possibility that earth movement can occur below the wall, Should further movement occur, exposing the face of the soldier piles, additional lagging will be required. It is not practical to excavate and lag the outside well face until earth movement occurs. The design parameters we have provided are based on our practical experience, and as demonstrated in our previous letter, the parameters fall within the range of values given in published documents by experts in the field. One can argue about which parameters to use in the design, but fronn a practical standpoint, measuring additional soil properties would require additional soil borings, sampling, and sophisticated testing and analysis. The cost and time required for this work is GEGTECH CONSULTANTZ, INC ig 4/ U 1 1 U (4 J. tJ -t • t J U N UL. U 1 t.. \• 1 1 W tJ 1 1 J U L.. 1 1 1 1 1 1 aJ 1 1 i `T L U 1 I T t tJ U V 1 Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o Cr Engineering July 10; 2001 JN 98399 Page 2 excessive and rarely conducted in the Seattle area except for very large public projects where time and biidgets are less critical. The piles are in rock and anchored to rock and are designed with safety factors, Selected anchors will be tested to 200 percent capacity. A solution that would not impact costs too much (slight increase in anchorage steel) would be to test each anchor to 200 percent capacity rather than the normal procedure of testing two anchors to 200 percent and the remainder to 130 percent of the anticipated load. We recommend periodic monitoring of the top of the piles. We support monitoring on a yearly basis (if and when significant slope failures occur below the wall, the deflection of the wall can be checked). If excessive pile deflection were to occur, additional anchors could be added. Based on our analysis, it is our opinion that this will not be required. We feel this Is a more economical solution than increasing the beam and anchor size at the present time. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please contact us. JRF:rne Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, -aderiA, James R. Finley, P.E. Principal 3F.OTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Rob Thompson 13256 Northeast 21)111 Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. Washing* *ton 98OO5 1425) 747-5618 FAX (42 5) 747-8561 February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Via facsimile: 206-285-0618 Subject: Response to Third Party Review Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hiilcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: "Review of Plans - Geotechnical Concerns ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated October 20, 2000, regarding the subject site, Dear Mr. Thompson: We offer the following responses to the geotechnical- related third party plan review comments prepared by Shannon & Wilson and dated March 21, 2000. Item numbers correspond to the numbered comments: Item 1, - The review of the project plans will need to be completed once the plans have been revised. Item ? - The parking lot Is not to be constructed as part of the proposed project. The design of the retaining structure does not rely on the presence of the soil above the bedrock on the downslope side of the wall for stability as the design is to carry all active pressures to the bedrock and start passive pressures at the bedrock elevation. item 8 - Additional settlement on the order of 1 to 2 inches Is probable in the near future, In our opinion, this adjacent structure will need to be underpinned to make it habitable, Underpinning utilizing a deep foundation system (pipe piles) would transfer the building loads below the Influence of the proposed wall. Our borings indicate that the slide was a relatively deep- seated slide travelling approximately 15 feet below the surface as evidenced by the SPT blow counts of Borings 1 and 2 from the 1995 study. Item 7 - The assessment of the stability of the southern building ( #14893) was and is not within our scope of work at the site. The currently proposed wall appears to cover the area of observed active sliding. Item 6- Item 8 - Due to the embedment of the base of the wall and all wall anchorage into the bedrock, the global stability of the wall is, in our opinion, not a concern, Item 9 - The fill shown behind the proposed wall on the recent plan will only be replacing GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c% CT Engineering February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Page 2 sloughed soil and will be retained by the new wall. Imported, free - draining, granular fill should be utilized to promote drainage. Fil placed on the eastern side of the new wall will only serve as an access road and a working platform to install the piles and tiebacks for the wall. The wall design does not rely on the soil above the bedrock on the eastern side of the wall for stability. ter 10 - The recommended wall design pressure is 35(H), where H is the design retention height of the wall. We have performed a slope stability analysis on a typical cross - section through the known slide zone prior to slope movement, The stability analysis indicates that the upper, medium -stiff clay soils would have an effective cohesion of approximately 250 psf and the lower medium -stiff to stiff clays would have a minimum cohesion on the order of 500 psf. The slope stability analysis is attached to this letter. Nearly all of the upper, softer clay soils were removed from the area behind the proposed wail due to the slide activity, These soils will be replaced by imported granular fill. In comparing the proposed lateral soil pressure with those suggested by Peck (1989) and Tschebotarioff (1973), we find general agreement. (See attached generalized calculations) The proposed loading diagram lies between these two theoretical loading schemes and, in our opinion, is appropriate for the observed site conditions. Ltem 11- The wall is designed as a permanent structure. The temporary, unsupported condition exists at the site today and will be remedied by the wall installation, Item 12- Recommendations for seismic wall loading are given In our letter, dated October 20, 2000, Item 13 - As previously discussed, granular, free - draining fill should be utilized. The backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor analysis, Access restrictions will likely prohibit large compaction equipment; however, the compaction should be conducted with relatively small compactors such as walk - behind rollers, backhoe - mounted hoepacks, or jumping jacks. The deflection of the wall should be monitored during construction, Item 14 - See the soil pressures recommended in our letter, dated October 20, 2000, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 g Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Page 3 We trust that the informations contained in this response package are sufficient to answer the questions posed. We will be available to perform the required plan review once the revised plans are completed. Please call with any questions or if we can be of further assistance, Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTA TS, INC. James H. Strange, Jr., P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer lamas 8/17= James R. Finley, P.E. Principal Attachments: Slope Stability Analysis Printout Lateral Soil Pressures Calculations cc: Bob Sieh Edwards, Sieh, Smith & Gooflend, P.S. 7170 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 JMS /JRF: me GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 19 88.35 19.66 20 91.21 20.54 taiiure Surface Specified By 31 21 94.05 21.53 22 95.34 22.53 23 99.58 23.85 24 102.27 25.17 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 25 104.91 26.60 No. (ft) (ft) 26 107.48 29.11 27 109.99 29.78 1 48.06 27.15 29 112.44 31.52 2 51.02 21.46 29 114.81 33.36 3 53.90 27,05 30 111.11 35.29 4 56.98 26.74 31 119,32 37.31 5 59.97 26.52 32 121.45 99.42 6 6.57 26.39 33 123.50 41.61 7 65.97 26.35 34 125.46 43.99 8 66.97 26.40 35 127.32 46.24 9 71.96 26.55 36 12/.09 48.66 10 74.95 26.70 37 12/.99 50.00 11 77.94 27.10 12 80.91 27.52 13 83.86 29.03 .••. 1.042 ••• 14 86.80 28.62 16 89.73 29.30 16 92.62 30.08 17 99.90 30.94 Failure Surface Specified By 28 10 98.34 31.89 Coordinate Pointe 19 101.14 32.92 20 103.94 34.04 21 100.49 35.24 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 22 109.40 30.53 No. (ft) (ft) 23 112.07 37.89 24 114.70 39.34 1 84.80 29.98 25 117.28 40.97 2 97.72 29.33 20 119.02 42.47 3 40.07 28.79 27 122.30 44.15 4 43.44 29.35 29 124.73 45.91 8 08.42 28.03 29 127.11, 47.74 4 49.42 27.82 30 129.43 49.04 7 72.62 27.72 31 129.88 50.00 8 75.42 27.73 9 79.41 27.84 10 81.40 29.10 *ow 1.041 •°• 11 84.88 28.45 12 87.55 28.91 13 90.49 29.49 14 93.41 30.14 15 94.31 30.95 Coordinate Points 16 99.17 31.05 17 102.00 32.86 10 104.74 33.97 Point X -Surf Y -Sort 19 107.52 35.19 No, (ft) (ft) 20 110.22 36.50 21 112.46 37.92 1 39.71 24.22 22 115.45 39.44 2 30.44 22.97 23 117.90 41.05 3 41.22 21.03 24 120,45 42.75 4 44.04 20.81 25 122.95 44.55 5 45.90 19.90 26 125,19 46.44 6 49.79 19.11 27 127,45 40.41 7 52.71 16.43 28 129.14 50.00 9 54.66 17.87 9 58.63 17,42 10 61.61 17,11 i -* 1.044 ..... 11 64.61 16.91 12 07,01 16.84 12 70.60 16.08 14 73,60 17.04 Failure Surface Specifieti By 39 15 76.59 17.33 Coordinate 2ginta 16 79.56 17,73 17 82.51 16.26 18 85.44 10,90 Point X -Surf 't-Surf Coordinate Pointo Failure Surface Specified Sy 37 No. (ft) (ft) 19 83.93 18.60 20 86.83 19.39 1 12.35 23.85 21 89.70 20.27 2 35.06 22,57 22 92.53 21.25 3 31.82 21.40 23 95.32 22.36 4 40.63 20.35 24 99.06 23.57 5 43.49 19.41 25 100.16 24.88 6 46.31 18.58 25 103.41 26.29 7 49.28 17.87 27 1066.00 21.80 8 52.22 17.23 28 108.54 29.41 9 55.19 16.81 29 111.01 31.11 10 58.16 16.46 30 113.41 32.90 11 61.14 16.25 31 115.14 34.79 12 64.15 16.12 32 118.01 36.76 13 61.15 16.13 33 120.19 39.81 14 70.15 16.27 34 122.30 40.55 15 73.14 16.52 35 124.32 43.17 16 76.12 16.90 36 126.26 45.46 17 19.08 17.39 37 129.10 41.82 19 92.01 10.00 38 129.68 50.00 19 94.92 18.74 20 81.00 19.50 21 90.64 220.55 * *+ 1.047 *4'• 22 93.44 21.63 23 96.19 22.91 24 98.90 24.12 25 101.65 25.52 FaiLurs Gurfacs Spscifisd By 35 26 104.14 27.04 Coordlnats Points 27 106.66 20.69 20 109.12 30.37 29 111.51 32.19 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 30 113.82 34.10 ))o. (ft) (ft) 31 114.04 38.10 32 118.21 30.19 1 43.57 26.69 33 120.21 40.37 2 44.10 225.07 34 122.25 42.83 3 48.82 23.68 35 124.13 44.96 4 51.54 22.42 3d 1229.92 47.37 5 54.32 21.30 37 127.61 49.86 6 57.18 20.32 38 127.70 50.00 7 60.04 19.44 8 62.95 18.78 9 65.90 18.22 * ** 1.045 * ** 10 68.87 17.81 11 71.84 17.55 12 74.83 17.44 13 77.86 17.47 failuro Surface Specified 9y 30 14 80.85 17.65 Coordinate Points 15 83.04 17.98 13 46.90 18.46 17 89,73 19.08 Point K -surf Y -Surf 19 92.43 19.84 No. (ft) (ft) 19 95.49 20.75 20 98.30 21.90 1 31.32 23.78 21 101.03 22.99 2 33.96 22.54 22 103.74 24.30 3 36.75 21.44 23 106.38 25,75 4 39,57 20.43 24 109.93 27.33 5 42.43 19.52 25 111.40 29.03 6 45.32 18.73 26 113.79 30.85 7 40.24 18.04 27 116,09 32,79 8 51.19 17.47 29 1113.37 34.64 9 34.15 17.00 29 120.36 36,99 10 57.13 16.65 30 122.34 39,25 11 60.12 16.42 31 124.21 41.59 12 63.12 16.29 32 125.96 44.03 13 56.12 16.28 33 127.54 46.55 14 69,12 16.39 34 129.08 49.15 15 72,11 16.60 35 129.52 50.00 16 75.09 16,93 17 79.06 17.28 18 81.01 17.93 ' ** 1.048 * *•' 1 ti 21 91.66 21.19 4. 94.43 22.34 23 97.14 23.61 *ailure Surface Specified By 29 24 99.81 24.99 25 102.41 26.49 26 104.95 29.09 27 107.41 29.79 Point /. -Surf !- Surf 28 109.81 31.60 No. (ft) (ft) 29 112.12 33.51 30 114.36 35.51 1 55.92 30.32 31 116.50 37.61 2 58.84 29.63 32 118.56 39.71 3 61.78 29.04 33 120.52 42.06 4 64.74 28.58 34 122.39 44.41 5 67,72 28.24 35 124.15 46.84 6 70.72 28.01 36 125.92 49.33 7 73.71 27.90 37 126.22 50.00 8 76.11 27.92 9 79.71 24.05 10 02.70 20.30 .4. 1.053 "' 11 85.60 28.67 12 08.64 29.16 13 91.57 29.77 14 94.49 30.49 Failure Surface Specified By 39 15 97.37 31.33 Coordinate Pointe 1+3 100.21 32.29 17 103.61, 33.3b 19 105.77 34.83 Point It-Surf Y -Surf 19 100.40 35.81 No. (ft) (ft) 20 111.14 37.21 21 113.74 36.70 1 27.06 22 116.29 40.30 2 30.60 23 119.75 42.01 3 33,38 24 121.15 43.60 4 36.20 25 123.40 45.49 5 39.04 26 125.73 47.49 6 41.94 27 127.90 49.75 7 44.06 20 120,15 50.00 3 47.30 9 50.74 10 53.73 ... 1.051 r.. 11 56,72 12 69.72 1.3 62.72 14 65,72 15 60,71 16 71,70 17 74,67 16 77,63 X -Burt Y -Surf 19 40,57 No. (ft) (ft) 20 43.49 21 96.38 1 33,47 23.41 2: 89.25 2 36.18 22.62 33 92.05 3 38.93 21.44 24 94.94 4 41.74 20,37 25 97.58 5 44.59 19.43 26 100.27 6 47.47 19.61 27 102.91 7 50.39 17.91 28 105.50 8 53.33 17.33 29 108,03 9 56.30 14.97 30 110.50 10 59.29 1.6.54 11 112.91 11 42.21 16.24 32 115.25 12 65.27 16.26 33 117.52 13 68.27 16.31 24 119,71 14 71,27 16.49 35 121.93 15 74.25 16.79 36 123,87 16 77 ,32 17.21 3, 125.81 17 80,17 17,76 38 127.72 la 83,09 18,44 39 129.36 Coordinate Points Failure Surface Specified By 37 Coordinate Pointe Point 19 85.99 19.23 20 88.84 20.15 23.59 22.37 21.24 20,22 19.31 18.49 17.79 17.19 16.70 16.32 16.04 15.06 1.5.02 15,80 16.04 14.32 16.70 17.19 17,79 16.50 19.31 20.23 21,25 22.37 23.59 24.9: 26.34 27.86 29,47 31.17 32,96 34.84 36,80 38.84 40,96 43.16 45.43 47.77 50.00 fff 1.454 .ff .. ..9. ..9.4 Pailur9 Surface Specified By 36 A 35.00 y ,.9)4f ..942. - 92 - .942..6 Point -Surf Y-Surf ..92..6.1 No. (ft) (ft) - ..42..5.1 SC 52.50 + . 942 , 4. . 1 34.59 23.99 .92.6..1.3 2 37.29 22.65 - .42.4..1.3. 3 40.03 21.44 - .426...137. 4 42.82 20.35 .426...13... 5 45.56 19.39 - 42....13... 6 48.54 18.55 1 70.00 + 42....13.... 7 51.44 17.04 - 42....13.... 8 54,40 17.25 - X2....13 9 57.37 16.00 - 2..,.13 10 60.35 16.48 - 28- .1 11 63.34 16.29 - 62....1...... 12 66.34 16.23 3 87.90 + 24...13 13 89.34 16.30 - 62....1...... 14 72.34 16.50 - 629...1...... LS 75.32 14.83 - .62....1...... 14 78.29 17.30 - 692...1...... 17 81.22 17.09 - .624...1...... 19 84.13 10.61 105.00 . .625..17 19 87.01 19.46 - ...24..1...... 20 89.85 20.44 - 21 92.64 21.54 L...248.1. 22 95.38 24.75 - 23 98.07 24.09 ...22001 .4 100.19 25.55 - 25 103.25 27.12 .1.42401 26 105.73 28.79 - 27 108.14 30.58 ... *24410W..* 29 110.47 92.47 6 122.50 + 29 112.72 34.46 ,..6 :17... 30 114.e7 36.55 - 31 118.93 38.73 ...621308 32 119.90 41.00 - 33 120.76 43.35 ..2113 34 122.52 45.79 - 35 124.17 48.29 .1 36 125.19 50.00 - Coordinate Points 52.50 •.r Y F T 1.054 t"* 0.00 70.00 67.50 A 1 17,50 35.90 X 9.00 .50 + T 140,00 t L W t 1710 31.10 Ir......00 70.00 17.00 100 00 Sorty haw GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 Northeast 20th Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. Washington 98005 (4251747-5618 FAX (425 ) 747 -8561 eat Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 Via facsimile: 206- 285 -0618 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Review of Plans - Geotechnical Concerns Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hiilcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington October 20, 2000 JN 98399 Dear Mr, Thompson: We have completed a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications for the landslide stabilization wall to be constructed at 14891 Interurban Way South in Tukwila, We have completed two previous reports related to the subject site. An initial Geotechnical Engineering Study for a landslide stabilization wall was completed on July 12, 1995, and a second Geotechnical Engineering Study for a Shoring /Landslide Stabilization Wall was completed on November 5, 1998. The plans we reviewed Included Sheets SS1, SS2, and C1 through C3, CT Engineering prepared the structural plans, which are dated October 28, 1999, and Murray - Tobiason, Inc. prepared the civil engineering plans, which are dated January, 20, 2000. A significant amount of time was spent tracing the various changes in design and deciphering the various correspondence related to the wall design. Also, we conducted slope stability analyses to justify our design criteria. After our review and analysis, we recommend the following: • The borings completed as part of the 1998 report indicate that the slide plane could extend as deep as the rock or hard silt. For this reason, the active soil pressure should be extended over the pile spacing to the level of the rock or hard silt soils (approximately elevation 22 feet). This change to the plans was previously recommended in a memo from Jim Finley dated January 28, 1999. The stability of the block of colluvial soil or rockeries left in place on the downslope side of the wall cannot be relied upon in the long term. As an alternative, a second wall could be added at the toe of the slope (on the Wade Cook property) and /or a substantial permanent rock buttress could be constructed to stabilize the slide mass below the proposed landslide retention wall. (These options can be discussed further if applicable) A permanent easement would need to be granted for these structures. Since a second row of tiebacks will likely be needed to maintain stability of a taller, single wail, -the- uniform soil pressure (35H) should be utilized in the design. • In addition, a uniform lateral seismic surcharge with a magnitude of 10H should be 1§ • 'Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership clo CT Engineering October 20, 2000 JN 98399 Page 2 incorporated into the design. Where H is the design retention height of the wall extending up from elevation 22 feet. When performing stability analysis using this seismic surcharge pressure, the surcharge should be reduced to a point load that acts at 0.4H from the top of wall. Typically, the factor of safety is reduced from 1.5 to 1,2 when performing seismic analysis. To satisfy the questions posed by Shannon and Wilson, we will need to justify the soil design pressures. We can accomplish this, but the wall design will need to be changed and reviewed by our office prior to issuing a final plan review letter and response to the third party reviewer's comments. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. JHS /JRF ames H, Stran . =, Jr., P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer /Logy /543, James R. Finley, P.E. Principal Geotechnical Report (November 5, 1998) Structural Engineers 4 t 5 E P 2000 GEOTECH NSULT ANTS, INC. .:i256 NE 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747 -$561 Wade Cook Financial Corporation 14675 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168-4664 Attention: Carl J. Sanders, Vice President, Business Development Subject: Transmittal Letter • Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Parking Facilities and Retaining Walls 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Sanders: November 5, 1998 JN 98399 We are pleased to present this geotechnicai engineering report for your proposed parking facilities to be located at 14891 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork, retaining wall design, and pavements. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P -4620, dated July 15, 1998. The project site is located below the Hlllcrest Apartments. A landslide occurred at the crest of the slope below the Hlllcrest Apartments in 1995. It is our understanding that a retaining wall is to be constructed to the east of the apartment buildings to stabilize the existing slope and for retaining the excavation for the parking lot. It is our opinion that such a retaining wall is feasible. The foundation for this wall will need to be embedded into the underlying sandstone bedrock and tieback anchors will need to be installed in the rock to provide additional lateral support. Extensive subsurface drainage facilities may be needed for the construction of this project. Pavement sections should be underlain by imported granular fill and a geotextile fabric, The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us If there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project, JRF :alt :1-.11111144.7- T°1TPAMVIP•abwm• Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, 4° Xi James R. Finley, P.E, Principal GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Parking Facilities and Retaining Walls 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of a proposed parking facility to be located at 14891 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The parking facility will lie between Interurban Avenue South and the Hilicrest Apartments. The grading of the parking lot will require cuts of 16 to 20 feet in height near the western property line, A retaining wall will support this cut, This wall will have a dual purpose of supporting the excavation slope and stabilizing the existing slope immediately below the Hillcrest Apartments. A landslide occurred in the area of the new retaining wall in 1995. No work has been done to stabilize the slope since the occurrence of the earth movement. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The project site slopes upwards to the west from an elevation of approximately 20 feet at interurban Avenue South to an elevation of approximately 48 feet at the western property line. Most of the slope is located on the western one -half of the site. The site is currently cleared near interurban Avenue South and covered with small trees and brush near the western property line, The ground surface is wet and soft, A backhoe was unable to traverse the site to clear into the center of the site for the drill rig. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling four test borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. A fifth test boring was planned, but could not be drilled due to soft surface conditions, The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during drilling, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal, The borings were drilled on September 29 and 30, 1998, using a small, track - mounted drill rig. Samples were taken at 5 -foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler, This split -spoon sampler, which has a 2 -inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches, The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency, A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered, The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 6, in addition to the four test borings drilled for this work, we also had in our files the results of two test borings drilled for the Hilicrest Apartments in 1995. Near the western property line of the subject site, highly - weathered sandstone bedrock was found in borings B -3, B -4, B -1 -95, and 8 -2- 95 at an elevation of approximately 22 feet. Overlying the sandstone bedrock are soft soils too • Geotech Consultants, Inc. Wade Cook Financial Corporation: : T' November 5, 1998 JN 98399 Page 2 consisting either of highly - plastic clays, silts, or fill soils. Boring S -1, located near the northern property line, in the center of the site, also encountered rock at approximately elevation 22 feet. Overlying the rock was approximately 4 feet of silt. Boring 2, located in the center of the site and near Interurban Avenue South, encountered approximately 20 feet of fill and clays overlying the highly - weathered sandstone and siltstone. At this location, the bedrock was at an elevation of approximately 10 feet, The final logs represent our interpretations of the field Togs and laboratory tests. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The Togs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test boring Togs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during drilling. Groundwater No groundwater seepage was observed while drilling. However, the soils are highly impervious, thus seepage can be relatively slow except in more porous layers. The soils above the rock were wet In several of the borings. Water levels were not monitored after the drilling process and the test borings were left open for only a short time period, Therefore, the lack of seepage in the borings does not necessarily indicate no groundwater was present. We anticipate that groundwater levels will be near the interface between the fill and weathered soils, and the sandstone rock, or within more pervious layers of the sandstone, It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. C ONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The construction of this parking lot will be difficult and expensive due to relatively poor soil conditions. Cuts of approximately 20 feet in height will be required at the southwest corner of the property, A large retaining wall will be required along the western property line and extending over a portion of the southern property line, If the wall is to be used to provide stability to the Hillcrest Apartments, the wall will need to be approximately 20 feet high along the entire western boundary of the subject property. it would also need to extend to the northern property line, We recommend that the top of the wail extend to Elevation 48 feet and that the west, or upslope, side of the wall be backfilled with imported free- draining pit -run gravel. The retaining wall will need to be constructed using steel, wide - flange soldier piles set in concrete - filled holes drilled into the sandstone bedrock. The soldier piles will need to restrain approximately 26 feet of soft, partially - disturbed soils, Thus, lateral earth pressures on the walls will be very large. It will be necessary to tie the soldier piles back with permanent anchors extending into the bedrock and across the western property line, Although the soils exploration drill was able to penetrate the sandstone bedrock, the drilling contractor may encounter harder layers in the rock that would require use of special drills or coring. Access to the site for equipment will be difficult due to soft soil conditions. It will be necessary to construct a roadway of quarry spalls placed over filter fabric to provide access for the drill rig along the proposed retaining wall location. Interior roads will be required to provide truck access to haul Ceoleclr Consultants, Inc. Wade Cook Financial Corporation November 5, 1998 JN 98399 Page 3 excavated material from the job site and to bring in construction materials. We recommend that a trackhoe be utilized for the excavation. Dozers or front -end loaders will have difficulty moving earth on the site. The soils are highly plastic and very sensitive to disturbance. All excavated soils should be removed from the site. The excavated soils are not suitable for structural fill, including utility back ill. This will require imported granular fill for wall backfill, utilities, and base material under the pavement. The west retaining wall will stabilize the slope, however, extensive work will still need to be done on the eastern two buildings of the Hil'crest Apartment complex, The earth movement under the foundations of these buildings is associated not only with slope instability, but consolidation of very loose soils underlying the buildings. The buildings will need to be underpinned, and the building and floors releveled, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design, Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. West Retaining Wall This section presents design considerations for cantilevered or tied -back soldier pile walls, as a soldier pile wall appears the most appropriate method for retaining the western slope, Since the most suitable choice of anchors is primarily dependent on a number of factors under the contractor's control, we suggest that the contractor work closely with the structural engineer during the shoring design, The design should be submitted to Geotech Consultants, Inc. for review prior to beginning site excavation. We are available and would be pleased to assist in this design effort, Cantilevered and tied -back soldier pile shoring systems have proven to be an efficient and economical method for providing excavation shoring, Tied -back walls are typically more economical than cantilevered walls where the depth of excavation is greater than 15 feet, or where high lateral soil pressures need to be resisted, Soldier pile installation Soldier pile walls should be 'constructed prior to commencing any excavation below existing grades by setting steel H -beams in drilled holes and grouting the spaces between the beams and the soil with concrete for the entire height of each drilled hole, Excessive ground Toss in the drilled holes must be avoided to reduce the potential for settlement on the adjacent western property. if water is present in a hole at the time a soldier pile is poured, concrete must be tremied to the bottom of the hole. Use of casing or slurry methods is recommended in areas where caving is encountered in the drilled hole. As excavation proceeds downward, the space between the piles should be lagged with treated timber, and any voids behind the timbers should be filled with pea gravel, The prompt and careful installation of lagging is important, particularly in loose or caving soil, to maintain the integrity of the excavation and provide safer working conditions. Additionally, care must be taken by the excavator to remove no more soil between the soldier piles than Geotech Consultants, Inc. Og Wade Cook Financial Corporation: November 5, 1998 JN 98399 Page 4 is necessar/ to install the lagging. Caving or overexcavation during lagging placement could result in Toss of ground on neighboring properties, Lagging specifications are as follows: 1. The maximum distance between the drilled holes should be 5 feet (edge -to- edge), 2. Timber lagging should be designed for an applied lateral pressure of 30 percent of the design wall pressure, if the pile spacing is less than three pile diameters. For larger pile spacings, the lagging should be designed for 50 percent of the design load, Soldier Pile Wall Design Cantilevered shoring or tied -back shoring having one row of tiebacks, with a level backslope, should be designed for an active soil pressure equal to that pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 55 pcf. If two rows of tieback anchors are needed, a uniform lateral active pressure of 35H psf should be used for design. H is the effective retainage height of the wall, beginning at an elevation of 22 feet. The active pressure on the west wall extends to the weathered rock, which was found at an elevation of 22 feet. Elsewhere, the active pressure extends to 2 feet below excavation level. Slopes above the shoring walls will exert additional surcharge pressures. These surcharge pressures will vary, depending on the configuration of the cut slope and shoring wall. We can provide recommendations regarding slope surcharge pressures when the preliminary shoring design is completed. The lateral movement of the soldier piles will be resisted by an allowable passive pressure equal to that pressure exerted by a fluid with a density of 450 pcf in the weathered rock only. The soft clays exert no allowable passive pressure. This passive pressure acts on two times the grouted pile diameter. The minimum embedment below the floor of the excavation for cantilever soldier piles should be equal to the height of the "stick -up ", The vertical capacity of soldier plies will be developed by a combination of frictional shaft resistance along the embedded length and pile end - bearing In the rock. :414;4 .44i . F:,i...�;... .,. {..ii. .:�i.'t:... :ti►,ti:�'�3� {.:tom 7�.a !. ='tt.: t::.i i.7.t i.i7:- ,:.:.7f::',i • ..J Rtiltiij. • •7i.i,'!"..i: i•L(c:i ,li.�i .4 `�i �eu, i . +..A:... . :i'.. "• %.t..$ � +'1 a...,.:N4.0 � t{ .r�:i?Ji`,.•.�7.1:.+.4:w3.• Pile Shaft Friction 1.000 psf 10,000 •sf Pile End Bearin • The above values assume the following: • The excavation is level in front of the soldier pile. • The bottom of the pile is embedded a minimum of 15 feet below the floor of the excavation. • The bottom of the drilled hole is cleaned of loose soil and rock using a mud bucket. Ceotech Consultants, Inc. Wade Cook Financial Corporatior. November 5, 1998 J N 98399 Page 5 • The concrete surrounding the embedded portion of the pile must have sufficient bond and strength to transfer the vertical load from the steel section through the concrete into the soil. Tieback Anchors Tieback anchors will need to extend into the weathered rock, thus, the anchors will need to be placed at an inclination of up to 45 degrees, It will likely be necessary to provide extra length on the "no -load" portion of the tieback reinforcement. This allows lengthening of the anchors to reach rock. The tieback will derive its capacity from the rock -grout strength developed in the weathered rock. Based on the results of our analyses and our experience at other construction sites, we suggest using an adhesion value of 1,500 psf in the weathered rock for conventional single- stage, grouted anchors. Soil conditions and soil -grout adhesion strengths typically vary over any site. Therefore, we recommend substantiating the anchor design values by proof - testing all tieback anchors. Additionally, at least two anchors in each soil or rock type encountered should be performance- tested to 200 percent of the design anchor load to evaluate possible anchor creep. These performance tests should be completed early in the anchor installation process, particularly if small - diameter or post - grouted anchors will be used, The remaining anchors should be proof - tested to at least 135 percent of their design value before being "locked off," After testing, each anchor should be locked off at a prestress load of 80 to 100 percent of its design load. If caving or water - bearing soil is encountered, the installation of tieback anchors will be hampered by caving and soil flowing Into the holes, It will be necessary to case the holes, if such conditions are encountered. Alternatively, the use of a hollow -stem auger with grout pumped through the stem as the auger is withdrawn would be satisfactory, provided that the injection pressure and grout volumes pumped are carefully monitored. All drilled installations should be grouted and backfilled immediately after drilling. No drilled holes should be left open overnight. Excavation and Shoring Moniforin Prior to installing shoring or commencing excavation, we recommend making an extensive photographic and visual survey of.the project vicinity. This documents the condition of buildings, pavements, and utilities in the immediate vicinity of the site in order to avoid, and protect the owner from, unsubstantiated damage claims by surrounding property owners. The existing Milicrest Apartments have suffered extensive foundation settlement and are likely to experience some additional settlement in the course of this work, The soldier pile walls should be monitored during construction to detect soil movements. To monitor their performance, we recommend establishing a series of survey reference points to measure any horizontal deflections. Control paints should be established at a distance well away from the walls and slopes, and deflections from the reference points should be measured throughout construction by survey methods. At least every third soldier pile should be monitored by taking readings at the top of the pile. We suggest taking the readings at least three times during the construction process. Geotec/t Consultants, Inc. 0§ ti Og4 Wade Cook Financial Corporation:' November 5, 1998 Drainage Considerations JN 98399 Page 6 A drainage composite should be placed against the lagging prior to constructing a permanent concrete wall facing. We recommend that weep holes be located no more than 6- feet -on- center at the base of the wall and 6 feet up from the base of the wall. A subsurface drain should also be installed at the base of the wall. This drain should consist of 4 -inch, perforated PVC pipe surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1 -inch- minus, washed rock wrapped in a non - woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). In addition to the drain at the base of the retaining walls, under - pavement drains will likely prove necessary. We recommend that our engineers review conditions when the site is cut to grade. At that time, we can provide recommendation for drain locations. The project bid documents should provide provisions for the installation of at least two drains across the property. ave ent Areas All pavement sections should be supported on at least 16 inches of granular fill, such as small quarry spalls (2 1/2- inch•minus) or pit run sand and gravel with at least 40 percent gravel (retained on No. 4 sieve), placed over a woven geotextile fabric. The subgrade should be in a stable, non - yielding condition at the time of paving. To evaluate subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof roll be completed with a heavy construction vehicle on areas to be paved, immediately before paving. Additional structural fill may be needed to stabilize excessively soft, wet, or unstable areas. We recommend using Miraf1500X characteristics. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub - section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 Inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt- treated base (ATE), This pavement section Is based on our experience In the area and on what has been successful in similar situations, Some maintenance and repair of areas can be expected, especially considering the soft nature of the near - surface soils on the eastern side of the site. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical, General Earthwork and Structural Fill Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density, The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates Geotech Consultants, Inc. Wade Cook Financial Corporation, November 5, 1998 JN 98399 Page 7 the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed In percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined In accordance with ASTM Test Designation 01557.78 (Modified Proctor). Structural till placed on this site should consist of a coarse, well- graded granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three - quarter -inch sieve, We recommend the use of quarry spells under the placement. Samples of potential fill should be reviewed by Geotech Consultants, Inc, prior to their use. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained In this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered In the test borings is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil or rock conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Wade Cook Financial Corporation, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site, Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied, The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design, We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings, Geotech Consultants, Inc, Wade Cook Financial Corporatic November 5, 1998 ADDITIONAL SERVICES JN 98399 Page 8 In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 6 Test Boring Logs Plate 7 -10 Grain Size Analysis We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or If we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. JRF :alt Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. sxaiass $ / 17 / g'z i James R. Finley, P.E. Principal Geotech Consultants, Inc. /! -. -`i5' Statr,, 11014 R?co I N J S Inrri JI /s Tr oo ��N Af.v r;,v STacr r._ J�It�C II SLUM S !ltSt �,] �2 It Sr ; t2nrN ;r 11 tr sr TUk :CVrNCL ItR PY�fr+Y ,-- ,.•,rr _.-._1 UTRAHCER M 8140 27 I VO m'C . 5curticcvrtu vu; 26 CC1I rv. Q 1r mum: j. I7]Po I 1 !76TH ;II `, A.L.• CCRP,aAr CR tt %ORPCRAIF nlhrtEi OR - -v faPU;rt3 zear�'' r 3 33:C ST GEOTECH CONSULTANTS VICINITY MAP 14891 INTERURBAN AVE S TUKWILA, WA 1 1.42,11 *.+ Oat*, Loppnf Bra P70t/. 98399 I OCT 1998 t Win 4 h • ecy 1.42,11 *.+ Oat*, Loppnf Bra P70t/. 98399 I OCT 1998 t Win 4 h • ecy EXISTING ROCK WALL B -8 EXISTING BUILDING ■ 1 1B -2 -05 EXISTING BUILDING so B -4 • 1.'► 1 1 13 I `\ 1 co 1 C. N ` N � 1 y ` �` N y ` 1 . PROPOSED RETAINING (MALL 1 N It 1 1 4' > / \ / ' / \ / 1 1 / tiV , LEGEND; S APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS - PRECENT STUDY e APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS - 95 STUDY GEOTECH CONSULTANTS SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 14891 INTERURBAN AVE S TUKWILA, WA .ve 4*, • 98399 • 00N • OCT •1998 • Pfaff, 2 • 10 15 20 26 30 35 S �' o�ti co, ,cc. 4 w Imam 40 �- 66 50/5" 50/4" 50/3' 3 4 BX co BORING 1 Description Sod Brown, slightly sandy SILT, low plasticity, moist, loose (Possible FILL) Tan SANDSTONE, moist, highly weathered, hard - becomes light gray with ash * Tat borlug was tcrndnatid at 21 fed during drilling on Sdptdmber 29, 1998. * No groundwater s4wpaga was encountered during drilling, BORING LOG 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, TVashington 'Job :Yo: 98399 Date: Septcmber 1998 Logged b Plate: 3 5400 4Q 4,5.E k .0\ 4,, �' `� 4141 c) 5 BORING 2 Description 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 �.. w= 32.5% wg 27.4% 50/5' 50/5' AINOMI CH `Sod Brown, sandy SILT with some organic matter, moist, loose (Possible FILL) Brown -gray, silty CLAY with occasional organics, damp, moderate plasticity, soft (Colluvium) (LL�34.0, P1 =14.1) LL�16.8, PI 6.7) - wood in sampler 4 50 Light gray SANDSTONE /SILTSTONE, moist, highly weathered, hard Ea * Test boring was terminated at 25,5 feet during drilling on September 29, 1998. * IYo groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING LOG 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tzdovila, Washington f Job No; 'Date: ILogged by: , 98399 September 1998 DBCC Plate: 4 1§ 1 BORING 3 Vi • ,� �j'C�No oo, ��44 • 5 Description 5 10 15 20 26 30 35 40 5 and 35/6" 50/5" 18 58 54 2 'Sod Brown, sandy SILT, moist, loose 111 j - becomes dark brown with organics, damp, soft (Calluvlum) •. i• Brown to Tight gray SANDSTONE, moist, highly weathered M Light gray, silty SAND with ash, tine- grained, moist to damp, medium - dense Light gray SILTSTONE with ash, moist, highly weathered, hard BX * Test boring was terminated at 26.5 feet during drilling on September 30,1998. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. BORING LOG 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Job No: Date: 93399 September 1993 DBG Logged by: Plate: i§ i; o� a ce 4 � die-) \Sod 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 w•$3V. 36 93 88 FILL BORING 4 Description Brown, gravelly SILT, moist, soft (FILL) Brown -gray to gray - black, silty CLAY, highly plastic, damp to wet, ver/ soft (LL =103, P1 -78) - becomes light gray to Tight brown, damp (LL*i126, P1 •101) OL 8X Dark brown to black, organic SILT and black coal seams Light gray SANDSTONE, friable with coal seams, highly weathered, hard * Test boring was terminated at 36.5 feet during drilling on September 30, 1993. * No groundwater seepage was encountered during drilling. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, J? C. BORING LOG 1 4891 Interurban Avenue South Tukovila, Washington Job No: Date: Logged bv: Plate: 98399 September 1998 DBci 6 • r 100 00 80 70 80 40 30 20 10 0 U.S. STANDARD SIZES BORING B -4 DEPTH 20 - 21.5 • 0 aD . N • r 0 Y r N . `"r Y w .9 r r. N 1111111110011111111111111111110311111111 1a...` ` UIUII1IIIIIRIIIII1IURI1IIIOIiiiIIII1IIUUII1IIUEII IIRII1IIIIIUIIIIIIIURUI1I1IUIIIIII1IIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII im o �°� iiiiinm IIUIIIIIIIIIIiIIllhIIUlIflhIIIIIIlIIIIIUhIIllhIIIII IIIIIIIIllhIEIllUhII iiu $I$III!IiiIIIIIIOIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIHHhIIlIIlIlIIIIIl IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIuIaIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIII1III1INhI immmii u • 0 a 00 q .° •• ti 8 � 0 a ��o SCREEN ®I7.E IN MILLIMETERO PQR CBNT PA08It1G GEOTECH CONSULTANTS lbw O R0°. g CICI 4, d 100 00 80 70 80 60 40 00 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14891 INTERURBAN AVE S TUKWILA, WA 10o A+o.' 98399 Oats, ' OCT 98 .. Plate . 7 100 00 60 70 60 60 40 00 20 10 0 U.S. STANDARD SIZES CLAY BORING B -2 DEPTH 5 - 5.5 8ILT 0 0 0 0 Y w r mum IIIiIuIIIIIIIIIuIIIllhuIIuii;iiII$IuIIu IIIllhIIIIIillhIiIlIllIIIIIiIlIIIIIRIIIIUlII i��n�um IIIIuIIIIIIuhI-_lIIIllhIIIIlIIIII_111111111 � 111111111111111111111111111111111E111 111111111111111 uIIIIIiIIIII1III_,1IiiIIuiuIIIIIu 1 uo IlIIIIiulIIi!IIi___IlllIuhIllllliII _ a in wn iiuinmami IIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIII I!IllflhlIlIIllI__Illllllh1I11IIIllhIIIIIIII11 miiiiiainiiiii__iiiiiiiiiiniiii _ Illu � N • GRAVEL II O A 0 00 O �j C o o 0 0 0 BCREEN OIZE IN MlLL1ME7BRS PER CENT PASSING GEOTECH CONSULTANTS a o 00 a ei r a 100 00 e0 0 0 0 0 ° eoi r0i 70 e0 60 40 30 20 10 0 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14891 INTERURBAN AVE S TUKWILA, WA .00 Ha.' kW: Rots; 9 8399 OCT 98 .. 8 u§ 100 00 80 70 e0 80 40 00 20 10 ii U.S STANDARD SIZES BORING B -2 DEPTH 10 - 11.5 8 O C • O f r r t CLAY 1Ill�nmmon 111 mug �����imnoimn 1111__IIIIUIIUII1I1IIPUUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRUU �mui�m 1111111 i�nini� �mmu� 1n�un ii�nin m���i IIIINUIIIIIII ioir1u ooiio 111111iiii���n�i�n�i �uinmmiini iu�u1no i1O__�IIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIiIIIIIllhIIIIIIIIllhIIIl ORAVEL • h .+ N r 0. s 8148. h nv+q o 000 ,; 41 eti Y ri OCREEN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PER CUNT PA88IN0 100 CO 60 70 40 40 0 0 0 0 c1 n r 40 30 20 10 0 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14891 INTERURBAN AVE S TUKWILA, WA .b0 No. s 08399 . z OCT 98 r P:o/f: !t a 100. 10 60 70 60 60 40 00 BORING B -4 DEPTH 5 - 6.5 FEET U.S. STANDARD SIZES CLAY SILT $ SAND 0 Q 0 MEM i Y.. i r 20 10 0 r 0 O .Ir SCREEN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS PER CENT PASSING GEOTECH CONSULTANTS -71111114.'. 111114.1"1111 R q 0 ,N GRAIN SIZE 14891 INTERURBAN A/ . . ------ .,......= TUKWILA, WA .00 No. I 98399 Ogler OCT 98 • A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included In your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recom- mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject To Misinterpretation Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pert!• nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications, Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate In prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation, Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field Togs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included In a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for Inclusion In architectural or other design drawings. Only photo graphic or electronic reproduction 1s acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi. tiona by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotech• nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written !et• ter of transmittal. in that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and /or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information, they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have suffi- cient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoint• ments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce such risks, gent• echnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations ", many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engi• nears responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks, Read these provisions closely. Ask questions, Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a gooenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmen• tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regu• fated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvlronmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer for Additional Assistance Membership In ASFE exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine ben• efit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with your ASFE•member geotechnical engineer for more information. ASFE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301- 565 -2733 Facsimile: 301. 589 -2017 email: into @asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 1.998 by ASFE. Inc. Unless ASFE grants written permission to do so. Duplication of this document by any means whatsoever is expressly prohibited. Reuse of the wording in this document. in whole or in part, also is expressly prohibited, and may be one only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly researcn. IIGER06983.5M GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, washinaton 98005 (425) 747 -5618 FAX (425 ) 747 -8561 October 20, 2000 JN 98399 Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 Via facsimile: 206 -285 -0618 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Review of Plans - Geotechnlcal Concerns Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hiilcrost Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Thompson: We have completed a general review of the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications for the landslide stabilization wall to be constructed at 14891 Interurban Way South in Tukwila. We have completed two previous reports related to the subject site. An Initial Geotechnlcal Engineering Study for a landslide stabilization wall was completed on July 12, 1995, and a second Geotechnlcal Engineering Study for a Shoring /Landslide Stabilization Wall was completed on November 5, 1998, The plans we reviewed included Sheets SS1, SS2, and C1 through C3. CT Engineering prepared the structural plans, which are dated October 28, 1999, and Murray - Tobiason, Inc. prepared the civil engineering plans, which are dated January, 20, 2000. A significant amount of time was spent tracing the various changes in design and deciphering the various correspondence related to the wall design. Also, we conducted slope stability analyses to justify our design criteria. After our review and analysis, we recommend the following: • The borings completed as part of the 1998 report indicate that the slide plane could extend as deep as the rock or hard silt. For this reason, the active soil pressure should be extended over the pile spacing to the level of the rock or hard silt soils (approximately elevation 22 feet). This change to the plans was previously recommended in a memo from Jim Finley dated January 28, 1999. The stability of the block of colluvial soil or rockeries left in place on the downslope side of the wall cannot be relied upon in the long term. As an alternative, a second wall could be added at the toe of the slope (on the Wade Cook property) and /or a substantial permanent rock buttress could be constructed to stabilize the slide mass below the proposed landslide retention wall, (These options can be discussed further if applicable) A permanent easement .would need to be granted for these structures. Since a second row of tiebacks will likely be needed to maintain stability of a taller, single wall, the uniform soil pressure (35H) should be utilized in the design. • In addition, a uniform lateral seismic surcharge with a magnitude of 10H should be 1§ ig 'Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c o CT Engineering October 20, 2000 JN 98399 Page 2 incorporated into the design. Where H is the design retention height of the wall extending up from elevation 22 feet. When performing stability analysis using this seismic surcharge pressure, the surcharge should be reduced to a point load that acts at 0.4H from the top of wall. Typically, the factor of safety is reduced from 1.5 to 1.2 when performing seismic analysis. To satisfy the questions posed by Shannon and Wilson, we will need to justify the soil design pressures. We can accomplish this, but the wall design will need to be changed and reviewed by our office prior to issuing a final plan review letter and response to the third party reviewer's comments, Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. JHS /JRF ames H. Stran . =, Jr., P,E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer James R. Finley, P.E. Principal 1 • SEPA Application Checklist Structural Engineers CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner: File Number: Receipt Number: Cross - reference files: Applicant notified of incomplete application: Applicant notified of complete application: Notice of application issued: ' . N \ \I I. ( ) I . I'ItO.I IF (' I /I)1•:VI';I.OI'\I I' N'1 UilIerest Apartments – slope stabilization It. 1.O( k 1 I( )N OI. I'M O.11.('1 /I)I \'1.:I.OI'\IFN I :(,,, /, /,,•\\ ,,,/, /,,%‘, N\,,,' /,,,,,,./ ,i„nil,, 11‘)/ 14891 Interurban Ave South 359700-0 020 Quarter: a Section: 22 Townshi : 21N. Range:_ _ (This in formation may bo fouold on your tax statement) ( I'ItO.li. ( 1 I)Fti('int) 1 I( )N The applicant proposes to construct a retaining wall to stabilize the Gast slope of the above property and prevent any further ground movement, kl'I'l,I( .VNI I NAME: 1 -lelen Inb Investments (C /O R, Thompson) ADDRESS: 180 Nickerson St, Ste 302, Seattle, WA, 98109 PHONE: (206) 285.4., FAX.: (206) 285 -0618 slit l —, 4 DATE: 02/12/02 ea 0 LI Fes, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Hillerest Apartments Slope Stabilization 2. Nance of applicant Helen Ing Investments 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: C/O CT Engineering PLLC 180 Nickerson St, Ste 302 Seattle, WA 98 109 Rob Thompson (206) 285.4512 4. Date checklist prepared: 02/12/02 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (Including phasing, (f applIcable): Late spring/Summer of 2002 7. Do you have any plans for f)aure additions, vwpausiou, or jhrther activity related to or connected with this proposal? !f yes, orplah►. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or wl I be prepared; directly related to this proposal None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly qffecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10, List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Tukwila Land Altering Permit 11. Give brief complete description of your proposal including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later In this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section 1 requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The applicant proposed to construct a retaining wall on the East edge of the property to retain unstable soil. Staging for construction of the wall will be from a parcel of land located between the subject property and Interurban Avenue and south of the Wade Cook Building. 12. Location of the proposal Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed protect, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal ►vould occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila approximately 15011 west of interurban Ave. S. north of Interstate 405, between S. 147th St and S, 149th St; the site is adjacent to, and directly south of the existing Wade Cook building. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, Class 2 slope. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, roliln hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What Is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? S0% (approx. 18' high) c. (What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, day, sand; gravel, peat, amuck)? If you know the elassllcatlon of agricultural soils, space them and note any prima farmland Sandy silt overlays clay. The site is classified as Urban Land by the USDA Soil Conservation Service. d. Are their surface indications or history of unstable soils in the Immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes. There is an existing slide area on the west side of the site adjacent to two existing apartment buildings. The Applicant will work in conjunction with the adjacent owners to stabilize and shore up the existing hillside as part of this project. Describe the purpose, t f►e, and approximate quantities of any fl/ling or grading proposer. Indicate source of fill. Grading will require between 400 and 1000 cubic yards of cut/fill for construction staging, f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion may occur during construction. Temporary erosion control measures will be provided. Upon completion the site will be stabilized (see 1 d above). About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? None anticipated. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, If any: Rest Management Practices will be used during construction in accordance with an approved Temporary -2- Erosion Control Plan. Areas of the project site and adjacent construction staging area will be re- vegetated with lawn or other soil stabilizing vegetation after final grading is complete, 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from Nw proposal (La, dust automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? !fatly, generally describe and glue approximate quantities if known. Short term emissions from construction equipment and dust, b. Are there any off-she sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce 10 control emissions or other impacts to air, Tatty: Water trucks will be used to help control dust during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide nannes. /f appropriate, state what SWUM or river Mows Into. Nothing in the immediate vicinity, The site flows downstream into the Green River, 2) WM the project require any work over, in, or aa(Jacent to (within 200 feel) the described waters? Jfyes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount offlll and dredge material that would be placed In or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be «/fectcd hnilcate the source ofJlll material N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descriptions, purpose, and approximate quantities f known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 00 ;gear floodplaln? If so, note location on the site plan. No b) Does the proposal Involve any discharges of waste materials to surface? waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Only storm water run off, -3_ 1 b. Ground: 1) W!II ground seater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground f orm septic tanks or other sources, Jf any (for example: Donnestie sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals.; agricultural etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (Jf applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are apected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, -.f any (Include quantities, df known). IVhere will this water flow? Will this water, flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff from roofs of existing apartment buildings will be collected, routed, and discharged into the existing downstream system located within interurban Ave, S. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? 1f so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, round; and runoff water impacts, (/'any: Storm water runoff will be muted through an oil-water separator and biotlltration swale prior to discharging into the downstream system. 4. Plants a. 4 Check or circle types of ve ' ' n fa on the site: ,L deciduous fret unple, 'spelt other x evergreen tre , r, •, other .� shrubs grass crop grain :vet sail plants; cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants; water lily, eelgrass, mllfall, .r other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The majority of the site is covered with high grass, blackberries, and scrub Alder which will be removed, where construction activities will occur. -4 s c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Only as required to stabilize the site aver construction of the retaining wall is complete. S. Animals u. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle vougblyds ether: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None ere known. c. Is the site part of u migration route? If sa, mpluhn. No c. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, If any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether It ►vl!! be medlar heating, manufacturing, etc None b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adJacent properties? If so, generally describe. No What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposer/ measures to reduce or control energy impacts, (Tany: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A -5 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist ht the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic on interurban Ave. S, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project an a short -terns or long -terns basis (for e:vatnple: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would cause from the site. Short term noise from construction equipment, during construction of the wall, 3) Proposed treasures to reduce or control noise impact any. None 8. Land and Shoreline U.se What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site contains two apartment buildings immediately West of the proposed retaining wall, The site where construction staging will occur is vacant, 6 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No e. Describe any structures on the site. An existing rockery wall along the northwest portion. d. Will any structures be demolished? Lim, what? Existing rockery will be removed only as required to install the new soldier -piled retaining wall. The new wall will replace the current rockery wall. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RCM • Regional Commercial Mixed Use What Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? RCM • Regional Commercial Mixed Use g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline toaster program designation of the site? N/A b. Nos any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specO/jh. The site is shown on the city's Comprehensive Use Policy Plan Map containing a Class 2 slope. 1. Approxlnsately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? N/A -6 IR • j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with e.risting and projected land uses and plans, if any: None, the project is consistent with existing zoning, 9. /lousing a. Approximately how many units 'you'd be eliminated if any? indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, !f any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - Income housing. None Proposed measures to reduce or control !rousing impacts, if any: Nono N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is tint tallest height of any proposed structure(,) not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Approximately 15' high retaining wall, b. What views In the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, Vow: Nono 11. Light and Clare u. What type of light or glare the proposal produce? What tlmne of day would it mainly occur? Nono b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None .7. , Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, N/A 12. Recreation a, What designated and informal recreation ►al opportunities are In the immediate vicinity? None in the immediate vicinity. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? !f su, describe. No e. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts on recreation, ',whaling recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, limy: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or nest to the site? If so, generally describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site, None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, (fatty. N/A 14. Transportation Identlly public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, {fairy. The construction staging site will be served by Interurban Ave, S. as shown on the site plan, Access to existing apartment building will remain via S. 149th St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? (I not, what Is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, busses serve It. c. ,flow many parking spaces wait' the completed project have? /low many would the project eliminate? N/A d, e, Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not Whaling driveways? !f so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Non anticipated. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rug or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No -8- If .. • f hots many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? !f known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This project is not intended to produce new vehicular trips, except as generated during construction. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: N/A 1 S. Public Services a, {Vould the project result in an increased need for public services (or example: fire protection police protection, health care, schools, other) if sa, generally describe, No? b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, !fatty. N/A 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b, Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N/A C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true at omplete to the best of my knowledge.1 understand that the lead agency is relying on theta to ntak / ►eision. Signature Date Submitted: -9 f $ n I() UI (O\1rr r 11,1) U\ 1111, 1N 1 F1 11.1:1110' 1'Orz \( ;F N( \ ON1.1' E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT P ROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective o- the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The_pr_immy_purpose__of this_project_is__tn _shore- up_the_siope_and_re duce_ the _potcntial_for_additionaLground movement, 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? IIi 11 f I +. _ 1 , 1 .11 uI ..J +� 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: 1S6 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the plan? jiQ 5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict (s) arc: -10 _SHANNON & WILSON, INC 208 895 8777; 10/'"/02 13:52; JatW #797;Page 2/3 n111 SHAN WILSON, INC. GEOTVCMNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS October 22, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer SEAMS PICHUHD PAIABANKS ANCHO A e DLN■Eq eSTOu►8 BOSON RE: TIIIRD•PARTY REVIEW FOR PROPOSED LANDSLIDE REMEDIATION, HILLCREST APARTMENTS, T KWILA, WASHINGTON At your request, we have reviewed the following additional documents regarding the proposed landslide mitigation measures for the Hillcrest Apartments, Tukwila, Washington: 1. Revision submittal dated September 25, 2002, Plan Check/Permit number — M102 -038, including revised Civil Drawings, Sheets C -1 through C -3 and Reviged Structural Drawings, Sheets SS1 through SS3. In addition to these new documents. we have reviewed a series of correspondence detailed in our letter to you dated May 31, 2002. Our review consisted of an evaluation of the appropriateness and applicability o('the supporting data assumptions, and calculations that were used in the design. No attempt was made to perform independent stability analyses or wall design. This letter presents our response to the designers' revisions relative to our continents presented in our letter to you dated May 31, 2002. We offer the following comments: 1. Response accepted. Note, however, that the response appears to conflict with the fill area noted on Sheet SSI and Section 2 of Shut SS3. 2. Comment 4 — Response accepted. We assume that the specifications for the project include specifications for the fill material and compaction requirements. We recommend that the specification for the structural fill be quantified relative to gradation requirements, or tied to an appropriate City of Tukwila, Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT), or American Public Works Association (APWA) standard specification. Comment 13 - Response accepted. We assume that the specifications for the project include the information provided in the response. Continent 18 — Response accepted per the drainage routing scheme presented on Sheet C -2. 400 NORTH 34rH OTREEf • eUITe 100 P.O. BOX 300303 SEATTI.EE, WASHINGTON 99103 206.632.8020 FAX 206.995.6777 TDD: 1800.633.6388 21 -1 -09711 -001 ..OHANNON & WILSON, INC City of Tukwila Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer October 22, 2002 Page 2 3. Response accepted, 4. Response accepted, 5. Response accepted, 6. Response accepted. 7. Response accepted, 208 695 6777; 10/ ^ ^/02 13:52; Jam #797;Page 3/3 SHANNON 6WLSON, INC. This review has been prepared for specific application to the project at this site, as related to the geotechnical aspects discussed herein. Within the limitation of scope, schedule, and budget, our review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering principles and pracdces In this area at this time. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project, and trust this letter meets your needs. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (206) 695.6845. Sincerely, SHANNON do WILSON, INC. Gerard J. Buechel, P.B. Vice President GJB/lkd 21.14071140142/WP/) c4 21 -1- 09711 -001 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila. WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 0 Z Plan Clieck/Permit Number: ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter 11 _1_ ❑ Revision 11 -- after Permit is Issued Project Name: Project Address:, Contact Person: Summary of Revision: _Lp2 -U38 Hillcrest Apartrnerits S •' 14903 =nterurb�ri Av S X I t t` r TUKWILA OCT - 12002 Prrrnvit fs rr'r; Phone Number: 20(40. vbs. Lt-Q s Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including rate of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: 0 Entered in Sierra on 07/17/02 O L L O City of Tukwila Attention : Brenda Holt; Permit Coordinator 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Ste 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Fax : 206.433.0179 Re : f ECEIVED ors' ')F T`JKWILA OCT -- 1 2002 t)ERMIT CENTE(, 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206)285.4512 Pas; 285.0618 September 25, 2002 Project : Hillcrest Apartments — Shoring Wall -- Slope Stabilization Project Number : M102 -038 Dear Brenda, CORRECTION LTR#. ltesnonse to Comment Letter Dated July 17, 2002 : Attached are revised construction documents for the above project. We have reviewed the drawings and construction documents, and made corrections and alterations according to the above letter. Specifically our responses /comments are : 1) Building revision review memo (dated 04/03/02) a) A formal construction easement dated September 10th, 2002 from the adjoining property owner is attached for your records. The neighboring owner has granted approval for access and construction staging as shown on the plans. This easement has been recorded by King County records on 09/24/2002 — (ref #20020924001916) 2) Planning comments - Art Pederson / Brenda Holt (dated 07/17/02): a) The landscape plan bus been included with this re- submittal - see landscape plan dated Jung 20th, 2002. b) A covenant has been signed by the owners and recorded with the County (see letter dated August 24th, 2002), exculpating the City per the above memo. 3) Reply to Public Works Department Questions (dated June 14, 2001): a) Item 1: The SS1 plans have been modified to reflect 34 piles. b) Item 2: The dimension lines and pile counts have been revised on SS 1. c) Item 3: See response (3) by Evergreen Engineering Services Inc (EESI) in letter dated 08/19/02. See Grading calculations and revised quantities on C -1 sheet. d) Item 4: See response (4) by Evergreen Engineering Services Inc (EESI) in letter dated 08/19/02. See drawing C -1. e) Item 5: See response (5) by Evergreen Engineering Services Inc (EESI) in letter dated 08/19/02. Boundary lot line adjustment has been brought up on the plans. Drawings SS 1 and C -1 have been corrected. 0 Item 6: See response (6) by Evergreen Engineering Services Inc (EESI) in letter dated 08/19/02. g) Item 7: A Temporary construction easement has been obtained from the property owners to the North and the East (see 1.a above). See attached easement agreement dated September 10th, 2002. Structural Engineers 10%- oc ("§ Attention: Brenda Holt City of Tukwila Permit Center September 25th, 2002 Pile Ref: M102.038 h) Item 8: A memorandum of understanding has been agreed upon and a covenant has been recorded with the County, Please see attached letter dated September 10th, 2002. i) Item 9: see below for S &W comments j) Item 10: The required certification has not been included with this submittal as we do not yet have a contractor appointed for this project. However, we fully intend to comply with this requirement, and will deliver required certification as soon as we have appointed a contractor for this project. We further understand that no construction permit will be issued until such insurance and bonding is in place and presented to City of Tukwila. 4) Shannon and Wilson Inc. Peer Review (dated May 31, 2002) : a) Item 1: See response (1) by Geotech Consultants Inc (GCI) in letter dated 08/16/02. Also see on sheet C -3. b) Item 2: See response (2) by Evergreen Engineering Services Inc (EESI) in letter dated 08/19/02. i) Previous 4: A copy of The GCI letter dated 02/15/01 is included - see response to item 13 - 90% compaction required - small hand operated compactors to be used, ii) Previous 13: A copy of The GCI letter dated 02 /15/01 is included - see response to item 13 - small compactors to be used. iii) Previous 18: Downspout water to be directed away from the slope. c) Item 3: Lugging calculations have been included and the drawings have been modified to reflect the use of 6x12 pressure treated lagging. A note has been added to SS 1 about lagging maintenance. d) Item 4: See response (4) by Geotech Consultants Inc (GCI) in letter dated 08/16/02. A copy of GCI previous letters dated 07/10/01 and 08/03/01 are included for reference. Periodic monitoring is recommended, and has been notccl on SS 1. e) Item 5: Sce response (5) by Geotech Consultants Inc (GCI) in letter dated 08/16/02. SS 1 notes have been updated to reflect this. t) Item 6: See response (6) by Geotech Consultants Inc (GCI) in letter dated 08/16/02. Performance based anchor criteria is acceptable - notes on SS2 have been revised to reflect this. g) Item 7: Typical tieback details have been revised to indicate additional information. This may be found in the clouded areas of SS3. 5) Lot -Line Adjustment : a) The lot line adjustments relating to this shored wall, has been recorded with King County in their records department on 09/24/2002 ( refit: 20020924001914 and ref #: 20020924001915) per the attached sheets. I believe that this letter addresses all of your concerns in regard to the above project, and trust that the plan review may now be completed. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely yiurs j CT Engine' g ob Thom Structural Engineers z �t EVERGREEN ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. LAND USE PLANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING August 19, 2002 Ms. Joanna Spencer City of Tukwila Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Hillcrest Apartments M1102 -033 Dear Ms. Spencer: R. Alan Murray, P.E. 2781 This letter will serve as a response to some of the comments in the Shannon & Wilson letter dated May 31, 2002, and your memo dated June 14, 2002, Items not addressed in this response will be addressed by others. In addition to the written comments outlined above, additional comments made by you during our recent site visit and as conveyed by fax have been addressed. Spencer June 14 Memorandum 3, Earthwork calculations have been prepared and arc attached. 4, The plans have been revised to instruct the owner to direct all roof downspouts to the parking lot drainage system. 5, The revised lot line between the two parcels has been added to the plans. 6. The riprap has been identified. Shannon & Wilson Ma 31 !wetter Items 1 & 2. Please see letter dated August 16, 2002, from James 1-1. Strange, Jr., P.E., Senior Ceotechnical Engineer with Geotech Consultants, Inc. 8625 Evergreen Way, Suite 104 • Everett, Washington 98208.2620 • Phone: 425 - 313.2500 • Fax: 425. 355 -1307 1 Ms. Joanna Spencer August 19, 2002 Page 2 Landscaping Plan You requested that we review the Landscaping Plan to determine whether or not the plants chosen were appropriate for the 10 -foot wide area at the base of the wall. 1 contacted Craig f3. Esvelt, the Landscape Architect who prepared the plan. He was aware of the proposed geometry of the swale and believes that the chosen plants are quite appropriate for this area. I concur with his selection of plants. We trust that the responses and plan revisions are adequate to allow the City to issue the requested construction permit. However, should you have further questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Evergreen Engineering Services Inc. R. Alan Murray, P.E. Principal RAM, jkr 2781 Spencer 020819 Enclosures cc: Rob Thompson MI L GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen ing Investments Limited Partnership 1522 Alewa Drive Honolulu, HI 96817 Attention: Lowell ing 13256 Northeast 20th Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. Washington 98005 (425) 747 -5618 FAX (425) 747 -8561 August 16, 2002 rl UC, J 01 ?obi JN 98399 Subject: Response to Third Party Review Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hiilcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: "Review of Plans ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated February 15, 2002, regarding the subject site. "Response to Third Party Review ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated August 3, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Retaining Wall Design Parameters, Landslide Remediatlon ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated July 10, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Response to Third Party Review ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated February 16, 2001, regarding the subject site. "Review of Plans — Geotechnical Concerns ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated October 20, 2000, regarding the subject site. Dear Mr. Ing: We have received the latest comments letter from Shannon and Wilson, dated May 31, 2002. We have prepared the following responses to their comments: Comment 1 — Through discussion with the project civil engineer, we understand that the proposed Swale in front of the wall will be located in cuts in the existing clayey soil along the base of the wall. If the swale were to extend into a filled area of granular soil, the swale should be Tined in that section with a liner or onsite clayey soil. Comment 2 -- (From previous Comment 4) The fill criteria are included in Geotech Consultants' letter dated February 15, 2001 as a response to Item 13. Comment 2 — (From previous Comment 13) The limitation to compaction equipment is included in Geotech Consultants' letter dated February 15, 2001 as a response to Item 13. Comment 2 (From previous Comment 18) We understand that the downspout water will be directed away from the slope either by directing the water into the existing stonnwater :2 OR Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership August 16, 2002 JN 98399 Page 2 system in front of the existing buildings or by piping the water all the way to a system located at the base of the subject slope. Either of these alternatives is acceptable from a geotechnical standpoint. Comment 4 - As discussed in Geotech Consultants' letter, dated August 3, 2001, the wall should be monitored as described Geotech Consultants' letter dated July 10, 2001. Comment 5 - Geotech Consultants has no objection to using test loading procedures described in the cited Post Tensioning Institute document. Comment 6 - The performance based criteria recommended by Shannon and Wilson is acceptable. In this approach, we recommend a minimum bond length of 15 feet be maintained. We trust this letter fulfills your needs at this time. Please contact us with any questions or if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, 4 U �, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, 0nnr,, liE.XPIRES 01.31- 0N cc: CT Engineering - Rob Thompson 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 Via facsimile: 206. 285 -0618 JHS /MRM James H. Strange, Jr., P.E, Senior Geotechnical Engineer Ayg., Marc R. McGinnis, P.E, President 1 § 1 g Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 08100 Via facsimile: 205 -285 -0518 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Response to Third Party Review Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hillcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington JN 0$?0r August 3, 2001 Reference: "Retaining Well Design Parameters, Landslide Remedietion ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated July 10. 2001, regarding the subject site, "Response to Third Party Review Comments.,. ", by Shannon and Wilson, Inc., dated May 16, 2001. Dear Mr. Thompson: Jeiit41:: As discussed at the meeting on July 25, 2001, we are preparing this letter tohaddress the wall design concerns raised by Shannon and Wilson in their previous letters, • In regards to the active pressure used for the wall design, we are recommending an active earth pressure of 35H be used in the design. In our opinion, this pressure considers all failure planes (shallow and deep) passing through the wall location from the top of the wall to the bedrock. We recommend Incorporating a seismic surcharge of 10H into the design to approximate the loading from seismically - induced earth pressures. We understand that an Increase In steel stress will be taken when applying these temporary pressures. In addition, the geotechnical values utilized for calculation of wall stability (passive pressure and anchor adhesions) incorporate a factor of safety of 1,5. In our opinion, these safety factors can be reduced to 1.2 when considering the seismic loads. • The wall monitoring program recommended in our letter dated July 9, 2001 should be implemented to monitor the long term performance of the wall, • The fill to be placed in front of the wall shauid be minimized from both an economic and a slope stability standpoint. The piling contractors should place fill only as needed to reach the tieback elevation. None of the additional fill should be left in place. As discussed at the meeting, the large depths of fill shown on the civil plans should not be placed. • For clarity, a detail of proposed wall loading is attached to this letter. We trust this letter clears up the remaining issues so that design and construction of the mitigation wail can take place. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. le Helen lng Investments Limited Partnershipc /a CT Engineering August 3. 2001 Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. James H, Strange, Jr., P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attachment: Landslide Retention Wall Loading Detail JHS: alt JN 9839 Page 2 cc: Shannon and Wilson, Inc, a Attention: Gerard Buechel, P.E. - via facsimile (206) 695.6777 Ground Surface No Load Zone Existing Grade (varies) Locate All Anchors Behind This Line Weathered Bedrock (approximately elevation 22 feet) 60u Tieback Anchors (embed anchors entirely in weathered bedrock) Notoa: D (1O min) NOTE: Soo Report and Subsequent Letters For 3SM Additional Design Criteria and Considerations 450D (pet) (pst) Passive Pressure Active Pressure (1) The report should be referenced for epecIfics regarding design and installation, The above allowable values Incorporate 8 sato(y factor of (1,5), (2) Active pressures act over the pile spacing, An additional uniform lateral prooauro of 1011 should be included when conducting a seismic analysis of the w&1. (3) faassiva pressures act over twice the grouted Soldier pile diameter or the pile spacing, whichever is smaller. (4) It is assumed that no hydrostatic pressures act on the back of the shoring walls, (6) Cut Slopes, non•underpinned structures, or other walls positioned above or behind the stabilization wall will exert additional rossures on the shoring wall, , GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC, Landslide Retention Wall Loading Detail 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Date: AUG 2001 N.T.S. IPlate: ,«onow.r La GEOTECH ECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bel Ievue, Washtnntoin 48(105 (425) 747 -5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 July 10, 2001 JN 98399 Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 Attention: Rob Thompson Subject: Retaining Wall Design Parameters, Landslide Remedlation HI °crest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: 1). "Response to Third Party Review", Letter to Helen Ing by Geotech Consultants, Inc, dated February 15, 2001. 2). "Response to Third Party Review Comments..." Letter by Shannon & Wilson to the City of Tukwila dated May 16, 2001. Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter la in further reply to review commento by Shannon & Wilson. As a summary of the project, a landslide occurred In 1995 below the northeast building of the complex. We conducted a study of this slide at that time, but no repairs were made. Further soil movement has occurred since that time. We conducted another study of the site, drilling additional borings in the fall of 1998. Since about this time, the building, which is located near the scarp, has been unoccupied pending completion of a retaining structure and necessary building repairs. Delays have come from a variety of sources including significant delays In the City of Tukwila approval process. The request for a permit to the City of Renton and focus of our design effort is to repair the landslide that has occurred and to stabilize the ground in front of the northeast building, We have not studied other slopes or any of the buildings In tho complex including the slope in front of the southeast building, The proposed stabilization extends beyond the limits of the landolide and will protect the northeast building. The southeast, adjacent building has not been endangered by the present landslide. The proposed stabilization method is a tied back soldier -pile wall with the piles socketed into bedrock and the anchors embedded into bedrock. The design does not depend on development of the adjacent property and is not intended to provide a retaining system for this development. We have assumed, however, that there Is a possibility that earth movement can occur below the wail. Should further movement occur, exposing the face of the soldier piles, additional lagging will be required. It is not practical to excavate and lag the outside wall face until earth movement occurs. The design parameters we have provided are based on our practical experience, and as demonstrated in our previous letter, the parameters fall within the range of values given in published cocuments by experts in the field. One can argue about which parameters to use in the design, but from a practical standpoint, measuring additional soil properties would require additional soil borings, sampling, and sophisticated testing and analysis. The cost and time required for this work is GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC chi Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering July 10, 2001 JN 98399 Page excessive and rarely conducted in the Seattle area except for very large public projects where time and budgets are less critical. The piles are in rock and anchored to rock and are designed with safety factors. Selected anchors will be tested to 200 percent capacity. A solution that would not impact costs too much (slight increase in anchorage steel) would be to test each anchor to 200 percent capacity rather than the normal procedure of testing two anchors to 200 percent and the remainder to 130 percent of the anticipated load. We recommend periodic monitoring of the top of the piles. We support monitoring on a yearly basis (if and when significant slope failures occur below the wall, the deflection of the wall can be checked). If excessive pile deflection were to occur, additional anchors could be added. Based on our analysis, it is our opinion that this will not be required. We feel this is a more economical solution than increasing the beam and anchor size at the present time. If there are any questions or if we can be of further service, please contact us. JRF :rne Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. James R. Finley, P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. ':�2Y'iiL`LiL:dII:.4N.%:N�? ail .@i"t: ?4`.'!Y:i'i?i*4' ✓,.:] +i .r3`.•,'^.S':,4 `ruts:' "%: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street, Suite 302 Seattle, Washington 98109 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue. Washington 98005 (425) 747 -5618 FAX (425) 747 -8561 February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Attention: Rob Thompson Via facsimile: 206 - 285 -0618 Subject: Response to Third Party Review Proposed Landslide Stabilization Wall Hilicrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Reference: "Review of Plans - Geotechnical Concerns ", by Geotech Consultants, Inc., dated October 20, 2000, regarding the subject site. Dear Mr, Thompson: We offer the following responses to the geotechnicai- related third party plan review comments prepared by Shannon & Wilson and dated March 21, 2000. Item numbers correspond to the numbered comments: /teat 1, - The review of the project plans will need to be completed once the plans have been revised. Item 2 - The parking lot Is not to be constructed as part of the proposed project. The design of the retaining structure does not rely on the presence of the soil above the bedrock on the downslope side of the wall for stability as the design is to carry all active pressures to the bedrock and start passive pressures at the bedrock elevation. Item 5 - Additional settlement on the order of 1 to 2 Inches is probable in the near future. In our opinion, this adjacent structure will need to be underpinned to make It habitable, Underpinning utilizing a deep foundation system (pipe plies) would transfer the building Toads below the influence of the proposed wall. ltm 6 - Our borings indicate that the slide was a relatively deep- seated slide travelling approximately 15 feet below the surface as evidenced by the SPT blow counts of Borings 1 and 2 from the 1995 study. It m 7 - The assessment of the stability of the southern building ( #14893) was and is not within our scope of work at the site, The currently proposed wall appears to cover the area of observed active sliding. Item 8 - Due to the embedment of the base of the wall and all wall anchorage into the bedrock, the global stability of the wall is, in our opinion, not a concern. Item 9 - The fill shown behind the proposed wall on the recent plan will only be replacing GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC 111 ig Helen ing Investments Limited Partnership c% CT Engineering February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Page 2 sloughed soil and will be retained by the new wall. Imported, free - draining, granular fill should be utilized to promote drainage. Fill placed on the eastern side of the new wall will only serve as an access road and a working platform to install the piles and tiebacks for the wall. The wall design does not rely on the soil above the bedrock on the eastern side of the wall for stability. em 0 - The recommended wail design pressure is 35(H), where H is the design retention height of the wall. We have performed a slope stability analysis on a typical cross - section through the known slide zone prior to slope movement. The stability analysis indicates that the upper, medium -stlff clay soils would have an effective cohesion of approximately 250 psf and the lower medium -stiff to stiff clays would have a minimum cohesion on the order of 500 psf. The slope stability analysis is attached to this letter. Nearly all of the upper, softer clay soils were removed from the area behind the proposed wall due to the slide activity. These soils will be replaced by Imported granular fill. in comparing the proposed lateral soil pressure with those suggested by Peck (1989) and Tschebotarioff (1973), we find general agreement. (See attached generalized calculations) The proposed loading diagram Iles between these two theoretical loading schemes and, in our opinion, is appropriate for the observed site conditions, /tem 11- The wall Is designed as a permanent structure, The temporary, unsupported condition exists at the site today and will be remedied by the wall Installation. Item 12 - Recommendations for seismic wall loading are given In our letter, dated October 20, 2000, /tem 13 - As previously discussed, granular, free - draining fill should be utilized. The backflll should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor analysis. Access restrictions will likely prohibit large compaction equipment; however, the compaction should be conducted with relatively small compactors such as walk - behind rollers, backhoe- mounted hoepacks, or jumping jacks. The deflection of the wall should be monitored during construction. /tem 14 - See the soil pressures recommended in our letter, dated October 20, 2000. GEOTECI-i CONSULTANTS, INC. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership c/o CT Engineering February 15, 2001 JN 98399 Page 3 We trust that the informations contained in this response package are sufficient to answer the questions posed. We will be available to perform the required plan review once the revised plans are completed, Please call with any questions or if we can be of further assistance, Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTA TS, INC, James H. Strange, Jr., P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer ruXPIRES 8/17/67---1 James R. Finley, P.E. Principal Attachments: Slope Stability Analysis Printout Lateral Soli Pressures Calculations cc: Bob Sleh Edwards, Sieh, Smith & Gooflend, P,S, 7170 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 JHS /JRF: me GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. GEO TEC H CONSULTANTS, INC. , { 13256 NE 20th Street, Suite 16 71 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 747.5618 A PAY (425) 747.8561 Job No. 9&399 Project I- i1lle�es -r Qpas,K Au. Subject LATERAL. sotL -. Rmssuees Made By -As Checked By Date 021r3 /zod)1 Page 1 Of • WALL. Reierl = zld ree. ..(m- 141fieili 111. zz /1id.Ote GAvSZA;HS • 5011.-6". 44 . 30 pd /1 L _ 5�/0.JT (de 0lfoeii�C ?4ebM ST46tI1 �y Aeialt�5 s) ei4/ : /47.0.044:40 _10,04p..1..40 _ >#4.4/, _Av./4s ,.4.. /977. a. we .. ... rat.O. Y■ _.0:.•www.•• aw..„ • • cs<a.cs._ . .s _xaam 3 �rN..n✓i .awr -24,i ,;..�., .., .. . 'iniX .'P,, . =0,31S tf = ........... tiv, 575030 XZI.1) 1207, 5. psi' Te, =(Iq.5'XI 24,7,sp$1) (A.5) 123 56 Foun3S f 4'0k /19pei /A, TsrAt.= +R = 1 (pit 77pork gM><":-(2:30.141 '5)441i1���,33� 2s$goo Pock 04 4,Mbitelm 4/1' Okla II %.. - 1!opeaw Sod la iwq • • olV to ° § i; Profile.out ** PCSTABLS ** by Purdue University modified by Peter J. Basscher University of Wisconsin - Madison - -Slope Stability Analysis- - Simplified Janbu, Simplified Bishop or Spencer's Method of Slices PROBLEM DESCRIPTION BOUNDARY COORDINATES 3 Top Boundaries 5 Total Boundaries Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right Soil Type No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below and 1 0.00 22.00 35.00 24.00 1 2 35.00 24.00 127..00 50.00 1 3 121.00 50.00 140.00 50.00 1 4 0.00 12.00 121.00 35.00 2 5 121.00 35.00 140.00 37.00 2 ISOTROPIC SOIL PARAMETERS 2 Type(s) of Soil. Soil Total Saturated Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Piez. Type Unit Wt. Unit Wt. Intercept Angle Pressure Constant Surface No. (paf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Param. (psf) No. 1 120.0 125.0 250.0 0.0 1.00 0.0 1 2 130.0 135.0 500.0 0.0 1.00 0.0 1 1 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE(S) HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED Unit Weight of Water = 62.40 Piezometric Surface No. 1 Specified by 4 Coordinate Points Point X -Water Y -Water No. (ft) (ft) 1 0.00 20.00 2 35.00 23.00 3 120.00 45.00 4 140.00 45.00 Searching Routine Will Be Limited To An Area Defined By 2 Boundaries Of Which The First 1 Boundaries Will Deflect Surfaces Upward Boundary X -Left Y -Left X -Right Y -Right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 0.00 5.00 110.00 22.00 2 110.00 22.00 140.00 22.00 A Critical Failure Surface Searching Method, Using A Random Technique For Generating Circular Surfaces, Has Been Specified.. 2500 Trial Surfaces Have Been Generated. 50 Surfaces Initiate From Each Of 50 Points Equally Spaced Along The Ground Surface Between X - 20.00 ft. and X - 75.00 ft. Each Surface Terminatea Between X - 110.00 ft. and X = 130.00 ft. Unless Further Limitations Were Imposed, The Minimum Elevation At Which A Surface Extends Is X = 0.00 ft. 3.00 ft. Line Segments Define Each Trial Failure Surface. Following Are Displayed The Ten Most Critical Of The Trial Failure Surfaces Examined. They Are Ordered - Most Critical First. * * Safety Factors Are Calculated By The Modified Janbu Method * * 19 88.35 19.66 20 91.21 20.54 Failure Surface Specified By 31 21 94.05 21.52 22 96,84 22.63 23 99.58 23.85 24 102.27 25.17 Point -Surf Y -Surf 25 104.91 26.60 No. (ft) (ft) 26 107.48 28.14 27 109.99 29./8 1 48.06 21.95 28 112.44 31.52 2 51.02 27.46 29 114.81 11.16 3 53.99 27.05 30 117.11 35.29 4 56.98 26.74 31 119.33 37.31 5 59.97 26.52 32 121.45 39.42 6 62.97 26.39 33 123.50 41.61 7 65.97 26.35 34 125.46 43.89 8 68.97 26.40 35 127.32 46.24 9 71.96 26.55 36 129.09 48.66 10 74.95 26.78 37 129.98 50.00 11 77.94 27.10 12 80.91 27.52 13 03.86 28.03 4•+ 1.042 + ++ 14 86.00 28.62 15 89.73 29.30 16 92.62 30.08 17 95.50 30.94 Failure Surface Specified By 20 18 98.34 31.89 Coordinate Pointe 19 101.18 32.92 20 103.94 34.04 21 106.69 38.24 Point X -Surf Y -3urf 22 109.40 36.53 No. (ft) (ft) 23 112.07 37.89 24 114.70 39.34 1 54.80 29.90 25 117.29 40.87 2 87.72 29.33 26 119.82 42.47 3 00.87 20.79 27 122.30 44.18 4 63.64 28.30 28 124.73 40.91 5 66.42 29.03 29 127.11 47.74 d 69.62 27.02 30 129.43 49.64 7 72.62 27.72 31 129.80 50.00 8 75.62 227.73 9 78.01 27.86 10 81.60 28.10 11 84.50 28.45 12 87.55 28.91 13 90.49 29.48 14 93,41 30.18 15 96.31 30.95 16 99.17 31.85 17 102.04 32.80 10 104.78 33.97 Point X -Surf Y.-Surf 19 107.02 35.19 Mo. (ft) (ft) 20 110.22 36.50 31 112.86 37.92 1 35.71 24.22 «« 115.45 39.44 2 36.44 22.97 23 117.98 41.05 3 41.22 21.83 24 120.45 42.75 4 44.04 20.81 25 122.05 44.55 5 46.90 19.90 26 125.19 46.44 6 49.79 19.11 27 127.45 48.41 7 52.11 10.43 28 129.14 50.00 8 55.66 17.87 9 68.63 17.43 10 61.61 17,11 * ** 1.044 "" 11 64.61 16.91 12 67.61 16.84 13 70.60 16,88 14 73.60 17.04 Failure Surface Specified By 38 15 76.59 17.33 Coordinate Points 16 79.56 17.73 17 82.51 18.26 18 85.44 18.90 Point }: -surf Y -SUrf Coordinate points « +. 1.041 „ *'' Failure Surface Specified By 37 Coordinate Pointe rki No. (ft) (ft) 19 83.93 18.60 20 86.83 19.38 1 32.35 23.85 21 89.70 20.21 2 35.06 22.57 22 92.53 21.26 3 37.82 21,40 23 95.32 22.36 4 40.63 20.35 24 98.06 23,57 5 43.48 19.41 25 100.76 24.88 6 46.37 18.58 26 103.41 26.29 7 49.28 17.87 27 106.00 27.80 8 52.22 17.28 28 108.54 29.41 9 55.19 16.81 29 111.01 31,11 10 58.16 16.46 30 113.41 32.90 11 61.16 16.23 31 115.74 34.79 12 64.15 16.12 32 118.01 36.76 13 67.15 16.13 33 120.19 38.81 14 70.15 16.27 34 122.30 40.95 15 73.14 16.52 35 124.32 43.17 16 76.12 16.90 36 126.26 45.46 17 79.08 17.30 37 128.10 47.82 18 82.01 18.00 38 129.68 50.00 19 84.92 18.74 20 97.80 19.58 21 90.64 20.55 4,ww 1.047 rww 22 93.44 21.63 23 96.19 22.81 24 98.90 24.12 29 101.55 25.52 Failure Surface Specified By 3S 26 104.14 27.04 Coordinate Pointe 27 109.66 29.65 28 109.12 30.37 29 111.51 32.19 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 30 113.82 34.10 No. (ft) (ft) 31 116.06 36.10 32 118.21 30.19 1 43.57 26.59 33 120.27 40.37 2 46.16 25.07 34 122.25 42.63 3 48.02 23.68 35 124.13 44.96 4 51.54 22.42 36 125.92 47.37 5 54.32 21.30 37 127.61 49.85 d 57.16 20.32 38 12.7.70 50.00 7 60.04 19.48 8 62.95 18.78 9 65.90 18.22 1.045 *ww 10 60.87 17.81 12 71.86 17.55 12 74.86 17.44 13 77.80 17.47 14 80,85 17.65 15 83.84 17.98 16 96.80 18.46 17 89.73 19,08 10 92.63 19.04 19 95.49 20.76 20 98.30 21.00 1 21.22 23.70 21 101.06 22.99 2 33.96 22.56 22 103.76 24.30 3 36.75 21.44 23 106.30 25.75 4 39.57 20.43 24 109.93 27.33 5 42.43 19.52 25 111.40 29.03 6 45.32 18.73 26 113,79 30.85 7 48.24 10.04 27 116.08 32.79 0 51.19 17,47 28 118.27 34.84 9 54.15 17.00 29 120.36 36.99 10 57.13 16.65 30 122.34 29,25 11 60.12 16,42 31 124.21 41.59 12 63.12 16.29 32 125,96 44,03 13 66.12 56.20 33 127.58 46.55 14 69.12 16,39 34 129.08 49.15 15 72.11 16.60 35 129.52 50,00 16 75,09 16.93 17 76.06 2.7.38 18 81.01. 17.93 ...Y 1.048 * ** will railure Surface Specified By 30 Coordinate Pointa Point No. X-Surf Y -Surf (ft) (ft) 21 91.66 21.19 22 94.43 22.34 23 97.14 23.61 Failure Surface Specified By 28 24 99.01 24.99 Coordinate Pointe 25 102.41 26.49 26 104.95 28.09 27 107.41 29.79 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 29 109.81 31.60 No. (ft) (ft) 29 112.12 33.51 30 114.36 35.51 1 55.92 30.32 31 116.50 37.61 2 58.84 29.63 32 118.56 39.79 3 61.18 29.04 33 120.52 42.06 4 64.74 28.58 34 122.39 44.41 5 67.72 28.24 35 124.15 46.84 6 70.72 28.01 36 125.82 49.33 7 73.71 27.90 37 126.22 50.00 8 76.71 27.92 9 79.71 28.05 10 82.70 28.30 `4* 1.053 * *• 11 85.68 28.67 12 88.64 29.16 13 91.51 29.71 14 94.49 30.49 Failure Surface Specified By 39 15 97.37 31.33 Coordinate Pointe 16 100.21 32.29 17 103.01 33.35 18 105.77 34.53 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 19 108.48 35.81 No. (ft) (ft) 20 111.14 37.21 21 113.74 38.70 1 27.86 23.59 22 114.28 40.30 2 30.60 22.37 23 118.75 42.01 3 33.38 21.24 24 121.15 43.80 4 36.20 20.22 25 123.48 45.69 5 39.06 19.31 26 125.73 47.68 6 41.94 18.49 27 127.90 49.75 7 44.86 17.79 28 128.15 50.00 0 47.80 17.19 9 50.76 16.70 10 53.73 16.32 * ** 1.051 * ** 11 56.72 16.04 12 59.72 15.88 13 62.72 15.82 14 65.72 15.88 15 60.71 16.04 16 71,70 16.32 11 74.61 16.70 10 77.63 17.19 Point X -Surf Y -Surf 19 80.57 17,19 Ho. (ft) (ft) 20 03.49 16.50 21 06.38 19.31 1 33.47 23.91 22 69.22 20.23 2 36.10 22.82 23 92.05 21.25 3 30.23 21.44 24 94.84 22.37 4 41.74 20.37 25 97.58 23.59 5 44.59 19.43 26 100.27 24.92 6 47.47 18.61 27 102.91 26.34 7 50.39 17,91 28 105.50 27.86 8 53.33 17,33 29 108.03 29.47 9 56,30 16,87 30 110.50 31.17 10 59.28 16.54 31 112.91 32.96 11 62.27 16.34 32 115.25 34,84 12 65.27 16,26 33 117.52 36.80 13 68,27 16.31 34 119,71 38,84 14 71.27 16,49 35 121..93 40.96 15 74,25 16,79 36 123.87 49.16 16 77,22 17,21 37 125.83 45.43 17 80,17 17.76 38 127,71 47,77 18 83,09 18.44 39 129.36 50,00 Failure Surface Specified By 37 Coordinate Pointe 19 85.99 19.23 20 88.84 20.15 •4* 1.054 '4' - 9. - ..9,4 Failure Surface Specified By 36 A 35.00 j ..91.P. - ..942. - .92 .. - .942..6 Pint X -Surf Y -Surf - .,92.,6.1 No. (ftl (ft) - ..4:..6.1 X. 52.50 + .942.6.. 1 34.59 23.98 - .92.6..1.3 2 37.20 22.65 - .4...6..1.3 3 40.03 21.44 - .426...137. 4 42.02 20.35 - .426...13... 5 45.66 19.39 - 42...,13... 6 40.54 18.55 I '10.00 + 42.,..13.... 7 51.46 17.04 - 42....13.... 8 54.40 17.25 - .2....13 9 57.37 16.00 - 2....13 10 60.35 16.48 - 28....1 11 63.34 16.29 - 62..,.1...... 12 66.34 16.23 S 87.50 4 28...13 13 69.34 16.30 - 62....1...... 14 72.34 16.50 - 620...1...... 15 75.32 16.83 - .62....1...... 16 78.28 17.30 - 682...1 17 81.22 17.89 - .624,..1...... 18 84.13 18.61 105.00 + .625..17 19 87.01 19.46 - ...24..1...... 20 89.85 20.44 - 21 92.64 21.54 L...240.11 22 95.38 22.75 - 23 98.07 24.09 ...222801 24 100.69 25.55 - 25 103.25 27.12 ...62401 26 105.73 28.79 - 27 108.14 30.50 ...'24410W..' 28 110,47 32.47 8 122.50 29 112.72 34.46 ...6:17... 30 114,87 36.55 - 31 116.93 38.73 ...621308 32 118.90 41.00 - 33 34 120.76 122.52 43.35 ..2113 45.70 - 35 124.17 48.229 .1 36 125.19 50.00 - Coordinate points 52.50 1.054 * ** F T 0.00 70.00 87.50 A X I 17.50 35.00 X 0.00 + + 17.50 + * T 140.00 + L * W 17.10 2000 12.10 10.00 117,10 10!.00 122.00 140.00 Sa1Ry Faders 1.06 1.07 1.03 1.00 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.14 E N G I N E E R I N G NM Clt°nt: PLLC Revised Structural Calculations For HILLCREST APARTMENTS Tukwila, WA Holon Ing Investments c/o Lowoli Ing 1522 Alma Urivo Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817 USA S= Joff Ing Tot (415) 902.4696 Rob Thompson Tel : (206) 285.4512 Structural Engineers 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206)285.4512(V) (206) 285.0618(P) rthompson @ctenginecring.com Revised Structural Calculation Structural Engineers 1 E N G I N E E R I N G "tt C PLLO �� Project: Client: Date- Page Number: 180 Nickerson St. Suite t(1_ Seattle. X1',1 98109 (2061285-4512 LAX: t7061 285- 01618 2' 4141- so LA9A-Akes 40+. 9'w >i pi, it. use A V 411- ,�� 2, 2,+(e. C-)1 11"1- Ri,44.2.4 N. wore, Ct ,,0v Lwe cf=. (121414 .(0) +4°' ogs -, fb xc, .40, $r.7- 329").1.' c. 5. Ito 1* cr. s 7%,.. 0.4 -, \--P- ti c,2 ,, TL Structural Engineers 1' si 12,24.* t, OKL- a 216 (:.61J 12 45e (oC/5eLel i; 208 343 8403 -y ED WARDS,9IEH,SMITH &Q00DPRIEND; Page 2 Pacific NW Title U8 QI002 Robert G. Steh Edwards, Siah, Smith ar Goedfnend, P S 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7170 Seattle, WA 06104 special waRRANTY DEED ©RANToas Helen Ing Investments Lims1a4 Partnership, a Washington limited partnership GRANTEE: Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership LeiaAL DIMORIPT1ON' Portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded on Vol 10 of Plats!, page 88, King county, Washington. AseassoR'>o PROPERTY TAX PARCIZVACCOUNT NUMBER: 0130700. 0020.09 THE GRANTOR, Helen In Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS (510,00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, grants, bargains, sells, conveys end confirms to Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the following deacribed real estate, situated In the County of King, Siete of Washington See the attached Exhibit A Subject to easements and reservattona of record The Grantor for itself and for its successors In interest do by these presents expressly limit the covenants of the deed to thoac herein expressed, and exclude all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or `other implication, and do hereby covenant that against ail personal whomooever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under said Grantor and not otherwise. will forever warrant and defend the (laid described roam estate, Received: J/25/02 1:21PM; 09,26,2002 13 :08 FAX 208 940 8400 206 343 1 4u3 -> rL WAHUb, �1CM, bM1 i melkuvvurnlc,vu, rage, pacific 4W T&C1. U8 E 1 000 Gated this , 24th day of , AUG/Lint , 2002. HELEN ING INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Heten Ing Its General Partner STATE OF HAWAII COUNTY OF HONOLULU On thisA'day of . n4� .., 2002, before me, the unclassified, a Notary Public In and for the titats "c:1" of Hawaii, duly eormniealoned sworn, personal appear d Nolen Ina, to nip known to be, or hevina shown e-- oattsfactory evidence of bona, the• rte."'... J FF�>._..�.._.,, of Helen Ina Investments Lensed Psrmerstwp. • Washington limited partnarsnlp, tttio corporation that ettscuted the (omitting instrument as General Partner of Helen Ina 1nvoltmenlns Umlted Partnarshlp, a Washington limited partnetsiup, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voltrntary act and deed of said corporation es such © clowns, Partner, and of said (4m*ed Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein menet:mad, and on oath CZ) w� that she was authorised to nrecuta the said instrument and that the aoai alibied sit the corporate seal of •`+�•• corporation General Partner, C C•'V, • ; W • 1TNlds my hand and official anal hereto °Mead the day and year in this certificate above wniten, '•C • `, y • •• +• • • U • • FNI 8. I�f ie "•. 14114 11 •1 • )es i Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and forth tale of Hawed, molding at My appointment aspires --J 1-• 2 09/25/2002 13:06 PAX 206 343 8403 • • 20020924601914 , Pecllic_NW' Title U8 0004 EXHIBIT A HELEN ING INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP That portion of Lot 2, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 10 of Plats, Pepe 55, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north margin of South 149e Street and the southwesterly margin of 8 8 H No 5 -M, said point being at right angles to and 30 feet from Station 108 +27.35 of said highway; Thence N22 °46'00'W along said highway 349 53 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing N22•48'001W 15 78 feet; Thence 889638'22'W 139.18 fast; Thence 922 °46'00 "E 15 78 feet; Thence $89 °38'22'E 139.18 feet to the True Point of Beginning Situate In the County of King, State of Washington • w .� , / •• • • • • • • •„ I I I� 1 1• ... fit• • Ie I . • t• • • • N•••• •• -s, Received: 9/25/02 1:21HM; 09/25/2002 13:06 PAX 206 343 8403 • 20020924001915 RETURN ADCRESS. KIRI MONTAGUE Romero Montague 1 SS -• 109" Avenue, Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 08004 E1911464 FAGS •e! OF 002 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED ut�e�r11'' GRANTOR: Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a 1riAlon Limited Partnership GRANTS': Holan Inq Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership LAICAL 1,8,8CRIPTION Portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to plat thereof recorded In Vol 10 of Plats, page 88, King County, Washington UMBER: 389.700. 0021 -08 THE GRANTOR, Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, for end to consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid, grants, bargains, sell*, convoys and confirms to Helen Ins investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the following described real estate, situated In the County of King, State of Washington' See the attached Exhibit A Subject to easements and reservations of record . The Grantor for itself and for its successors In interest do by those presents expressly limit the covenants of the deed to those herein expressed,. +end "exclude all covenants arising or to arise by statutory or other implication, and .c12 hereby covenant that against all persons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim by, through or under said Grantor and not otherwise, will forever warrant and defend the said described real estate, Received: 9/25/02 1:21PM; 09/25/2002 13:08 FAX 208 343.8 :&2 . a Lh Crs Q Chi CN1 • ti ;GOO :J4J U4Ud -» ouwMMu ,oiM,alMllr &uuuurM1tNU; rage o Pacific NW Title U8 (J006 Dated this � day of SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP its..... ....�.........�...r- STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF K 1 N 0 ) �ss , 2002, On this Ylkftry of Q 0002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Pubilo In and for the State of ashy" gto , du y commissioned and sworn, personally appeared _ —4, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a ,,, . ;;, -n limited partnership, the corporation that executed oing instrument as General Partno - - e e Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a VadQ Wn Iuried partnership, and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of Geld corporation es such General Partner, and of geld Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and an oath stated that he /she/they was/were authonzed to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed In the corporate seat of said corporation General Partner WITNESS my hand and official seal h • \ :•• a •• 1r : �r w • M „„"r""*.. ...1 tiny • :: .. • •i �� 6 444 1 4f / /\, 1 • \�\ r.....1I 11111 I ..•i11,, • tho day and y • . r In this certificate above written , ' 1I nnt/Type erne NOTARY PUBLIC In and f Slat r Washington, residing at � �._ • _ Lt ______ My appointment expires ig ti I.. Si .4 V tl V • 001 t. ad • V L •. L 1 1 1.1 , 09/28/2002 18:06 PAX 208 343 8403 6VV Vtia! VtiVV — 1r V••MI.1J0J, 4JLI_I•1 4/1411 1 1 1 Pewj,.fic 4W Title U8 • i • `M • • • 0 • 20020529009915 EXHIBIT A •• 0 r r ....114 $0 0 I{ Lt..l•1J , 1 e14.1411 SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TO HELEN INC INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP That portion of Lot 2, Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, records of King County, Washington, described as follows, Commencing at the Intersection of the northerly margin of South 149th Street end the southwesterly margin of SSH #5 -M, said point being M right angles to and 30 feet from Station 108 +27.35 of said highway, Thence N22e48.00°W 111 37 feet, Thence N88 °39'00 1W 143.31 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing N88 °39'00 "W 11.14 feet, Thence N22 °48'00 "W 227 35 feet; Thence N89 °38122 "E 10.82 feet; Thence 922 °48100 °E 228 13 feet to the True Point of Beginning Situate In the County of King, State of Washington • • ea • • - • •• • • • , Mt :y '; Ili} r 0001 1 Received: 9/25/02 1:22PM; ROBERT G S1EH Edwards Sieh Smith & Gondfr!end, P S 701 .5th Avenue, Suite 7110 Seattle, WA 98104 205 343 0403 -> EDWARDS,SIEH,SMITH& UOUrMitNU; rage d CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT RETAINING WALL AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM GRANTORS: Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a WADA e Umitod Partnership, Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc We Wades Cook Seminars, Inc f /k/a United Support Association — GRANTed: Helen Ing Investmontc Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership ,-- LltaAt. D6scr1PTtoNe. The North 250 ft along the Wont line of Lot 2, of Interurban edd,tlon to Seattle, as per Plat recorded to Volume 10 of Plats, Page 85, Records of King County. CD C,:: �� Portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof c`441 recorded In Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington 0'1 Portion of Lot 2, interurban addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof CM recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Pape 58, records of Kind County, Washington, cssessOR's PROPERTY TAX PARc6UAccoUNT NUMMI: 550- 700.0023.08, 359. 700.0021.00, p Pi� uJ .-• 389700.0020.00 Sari -+-2 - THIS IN Q T RE is made by Seattle) Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Limited Partnership, and Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc f /k/a Wade Cook Seminars, Inc f/k/a United Support Association, hereafter called the Grantor, and Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, hereinafter called Grantee WIiTNESSETH, EXCISE NOT - EQUiFlED NI 1 ig Received: 9/25/02 1:22PM; 09/25/2002 13:01 FAX 208 343 8403 208 343 8403 -> E0WAR08,SIEH,$MIIM&uuouhHlhNu; Rage Y Pgcific`YW Time U8 Ij0o9 1. Grant of Easement. For and In consideration of valuable benefits the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor grants and conveys an exclusive easement for the purposes described in paragraph 3 across the property described in paragraph 2. 2. E earra/_Deseriplk n of basement. The property subject to the easement is located In K1rig County, State of Washington The property subject to the easement is composed of two parcels, legally described as follows' arco P i Cane• That portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, Records of King County, Washington, described as follows' Beginning at the Intersection of the Northerly margin of South 149th Street and the Southwesterly margin of SSH #5•■, said point being at right angles to and 30 feet from station 108 +27.35 of said highway, Thence N 22°48'00" W 111.37 feat to the point of beginning, Thence continuing N 22 °48'00" W 253 94 feet, Thence S 89 °38'22" W 139 18 feet, Thence S 22 °48'00" E parallel to said highway 243.91 feet, .o Thence S 88 °39'00" E parallel to the North margin of South 149th Street 143 31 tg'1 feet to the point of beginning. Y— Situate in the County of King, State of Washington The south seventy (70) feet of the real property described eaea• N The North 250 Foot, as measured along the West lino of Lot 2, of Interurban a Addition to Seattle, as per Plot recorded in Volume 10 of Pleats, Pogo 85, records of King County; C■l Except that portion, described as follows' Beginning at tho Northwest corner of said Lot; Thence South along the West line of said Lot 250 00 feet, Thence North 89 °37'52" East 178.40 foot, Thence Northwesterly to a point on the North line of said lot which is North 89"37'52" East a distance of 10 00 feet from the point of beginning; Thence South 89°37'52" West 10 00 foot to the point of beginning of said exceptions; 2 ;' '.i 1102 Mecelved: Y /'Lb /02 1 :22f M; 09/25/2002 13:01 1:A.i 206 343 8403 ••■••••••••■••••■•••••••..■ 20020924001916 4U0 j4j tl4U:3 -> tUWAHUS, S1bH, SM1 I H &UOOU1- HIENU; Page lo Pacific NW 'Title t'8 r ioio Arid except that portion of Lot 2 of Interurban addition to Seattle, as per Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, Records of King County, described as follows. Beginning as a,point on the North line of said Lot 2, Tying south 89 °37'52" West 145 13 feat from the intersection of said North line with the Southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue South (the Southwesterly lino of the Northeasterly 40 feet of lot 2); Thence North 69°37'52" East, 50.58 foot to a point on a curve to the right with a 160 00 foot radius and initial radial bearing of south 22°13'28" East, Thence Southwesterly on said curve an arc of 122.09 feet and central angle of 43.42'40" to the North Tine of said lot 2; Thence North 89637152" East 59 58 feet to the point of beginning, as conveyed to the City of Tukwila by recording no 9305081289; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of ling, State of Washington, 3. purdese of asornent. 3.1. This easement is for construction and maintenance of a retaining wall, roughly parallel to, and west of the westerly property line of the real property described in paragraph 2 above, rand for construction and maintenance of a drainage system associated with the retaining wall install ation, together with associated drainage facilities such as males The retaining wail is being constructed on the real property describ ©d in Section 4 below, and the associated drainages system ie being conatructod on Parcel On described in Section 2 above, Tho rights granted under this easement include ingress, ogress and access to the property described in Suction 2 for the construction end maintenance of the retaining wall and drainage system, Including, but not limited to, the temporary placement of such trucks, drilling machines, earth moving equipment, and any other equipment used for the construction and maintenance of the drainage system, and for related activities, including, but not limited to, temporary placement or storage of soils and fill, materials used In construction and maintenance, temporary buildings or trailers, placement of fencing, and all other mete reasonably necessary or advisable for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wail 3.2. Grantee agrees to complete, at Its sole cost and expense, the work necessary to construct tho retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities in a professional and workmeanlike manner as soon as reasonably practicable following execution of this easement by Grantor, but in no event later than October 31, 2003. Grantee also shall complete the work In accordance with all applicable building codes, laws, rules, and regulations, and shall obtain the permits end approval° neceassary for such work, If any. Grantee shall keep the property free and clear of liens and other encumbrances arlaing from or relating to the construction, repair, restoration or maintentinco within the easement area If Grantee fails to do so, or to otherwise moot its obligations hereunder, Grantor, may, but is not obligated to, pay such costs and expenses arising from or relating to Grantee's breach, and bill Grantee for Grantor's coats If Grantor la not reimburaod within 30 days from the date of 3 0§ Og Received: 9/25/02 1 :22PM; 09/26/2002 13:07 FAX 208 343 8403 206 343 84U:i -> tUWNMIJa,J1Cf�,JM.1�iaa�a,vv1 I,.�,.u, ,.y„ Pacific 3W Title U8 X1011 W 1, �W •JY billing for its costs, Grantor may have a ken for the unpaid costs placed upon Grantee's property. 4, Prod erty_ Serval. The easement is for the benefit of the real property described as See attached Exhibit A 6 , Resforat'Io n af._l�ropetty. Grantee shall not be required to perform any restoration of Grantor's property following initial construction of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities, Upon completion of construction, Grantee shell thereafter, following any maintenance of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities, restore the Premises described in Section 2 above to its condition prior to the maintenance 8(a), aesae�,Nattonns by ©fir. Except as may be required for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities described in Section 3 above, nothing in this easement gives to anyone the right to Interfere with the use by Grantor, its officers, employees, agents, guests, or its successors or assigns of the easement In common with others as defined in this easement document. 6(b). Grantor may at its sole expense, re -route the drainage system when and if It chooses to install Its own drainage system which would be adequate to provide the same drainage as the drainage system to be insttellad and maintained by Grantee Upon installation of any drainage system by Grantor which replaces or roe- routes the drainage system installed by Grantee, Grantee shall have no further liability of any kind to Grantor arising out of the drainage system installed by Grantee 7, bisesilaanLmi. Grantee shall pay, defend, indemnify and hold Grantor, Its officers, employees, agents, guests, customers, and °renter's successors and assigns harmless from any liability for injury to parsons or damage to property arising out of the construction or maintenance of the retaining wall, which Is on tho real property described In Section 4 and which roughly parallels the north -south common boundary between the real properties described in paragraphs 2 and 4, or out of the construction And maintenance of the drainage system nand related faacslities, except for liability caused by the negligence or greater fault of Grantor or Grantor's agents, representatives, contractors, guests or others on Grantor's property through Grantor. 8. ^ ,°cameral aid Asalons. The terms of this eaesemont are for the benefit of, and shall also bind, the heirs, successors and assigns of Grantor and Grantee 9. - , : u' - . t - - . The covenants contained In this easement run with the hand described in this ealssement end are for the benefit of the present owners of than described hand and their grantees, heirs, assigns and successors 4 1 g Hecelveq: vie*, U4 1:eerm; 09/25/2002 13 :07 PAX 208 343 8403 CNU JYJ tJ'�JV t.J11M11 L/J 1 J4.t . , J.I.4. Pacific 4W Title U8 Z012 10. Attorney's Fees. In the event of a dispute over the terms of this easement, or to enforce the terms of this easement, the prevailing party shall be paid such party's attorney's fees and costs, including, without limitation, reimbursement of any expert witness fees, and the costs of mediation, arbitration, trial or appeal 11. gptIre Aareement. This easement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties. 12. Notices,, Notices given hereunder shall be given by (I) personal delivery; (II) overnight courier, (III) telecopy or fax followed by first class mail, or (iv) certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses under each party's signature below. A party may change its address by written notice to the other party. Notices shall be deemed to be received and effective (1) when personally delivered, (11) one day after the date of forwarding by overnight courier, (iii) on the date of telecopy or facsimile with confirmation if the date of receipt is not a weekend or holiday, or if a weekend or holiday, then on the next business day; or (iv) if sent via certified mail, on the date of receipt LO GRANTEE C3 C'V av: Helen Ina, General Partner .� CN C C;.., N GRANTOR HELEN INO INVESTMENTS LIMITED SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIMM rITTNERSHIP, v PARTNERSHIP A N LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ItlLIM..■■•■••■ Authorized Repreeantiative STOCK MARKET INSTITUTE OP LEARNING, INC. F /K/A WADE COOK SEMINARS, INC. FIK/A UNITED SUPPORT ASSOCIATION Its Authorized Representative Hecexvecl: W /L5 /uE 1 :eJrM; 09/25/2002 13:08 FAX 208 3d3 _BAD; LVU ..,Y„ .�Y V.., `y•,I1, 0LJ%69 S..l�, Pacific NW Title U8 ra013 aainiama 10. I,tyo rs�er!e_Ties. In the event of a dispute over the terms of thus easement. or to enforce the terms of this easement, the prevailing party shall be paid such party's attorney's fees and costs, including, without limitation, reimbursement of any expert witness fees, and the costs of mediation, arbitration, trial or appeal 11. plant Arsr sment.,'This easement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made in wnting and signed by the parties 12. fNofie 1 Notices given hereunder shall be given by (1) personal delivery, (11) overnight courier, (iii) telecopy or fax followed by first class mail, or (iv) certified mail, retum receipt requested, to the addresses under each party's signature below A party may change Its address by written notice to the other party, Notices shall be deemed to be received and effective (I) when personally delivered, (ii) one day after the date of forwarding by overnight courier, (ill) on the date of telecepy or facsimile with confirmation if the date of receipt is not a weekend or holiday, or If a weekend or holiday, then on the next business day: or (iv) If gent via certified mall, on the date of receipt GRANTEt3 H*uiN ING INVESTMENTS PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP Helen I p, General Farm LIMITED LIMr erf • GRANTOR te SEATTLE TACOMA Exrcu71va PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMYTL'D PARTNERSHIP Auk � h rtzsd Ropre►amn�tatfve STOCK MARKET INSTITUTE OF LEARNING, INC. P /K/A WADS COOK SEMINARS, INC. FIKJA UNITED SUPPORT AssOCIAT1GN Authorized Representative Received: 9/25/02 1 :23} M; 0925/2002 13:08 FAX 208 343 8403 'GUC JUJ tl4U0 tUrr,v,y ua , ater-i. one . , i iuuuvu, „aa..�•u, , aye .Pacific 4W title t;8 fa) 014 STATE OF HAWAII ) )ers. COUNTY OF HONOLULU) On this day of 2002, before) ?t18. the undersigned, a Notary pubic in and for the State of Hawes, duty commissioned and sworn. personalty appeared Helen In to me known to bo, or having shown satisfactory evidence of bring, the Comical Partner of Helen Ing Investments Urnitrd Partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument eaa Canard( partner of Helen Ing Inveatmonts Limited Partnatship a WseehIngton Limited Partnership, and acknowledged the said Instrumtant to be tho free and voluntary act and dried of said corporation an such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for thr ueeres and purposes therein mandoned, and on oath stated that she was auhonzed to execute the said instrument and that the anal affbred ees the corporate anal of said corporation Minoru' PaRner. ea+ ter �, StifinlII408 cpy hand and official soot hereto affixed the dey and yew In this cart fiesta above written • !. :4 j .„. v • • 3 •fa g d1 STATtet r4V SIINOTON 4:=I COUNTY OF KING "%IrY Print/Typo Name NOTARY PUauC in and for the Hawaii. residing at / 3" My appointment aspen. to of On this -.doll of , 2002, before ma, tho undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the elate of Washington, duly commeaseoned and sworn peervonally appeared before) ma la me known to ha, or having shown satisfactory evidence catalog, the partner of Seattle Tacoma t xecuteve Propardna Limited Pannerehep. a Washington Limned Partnership, and having on oath *toted that he /she was authon :ad to otrocuta the instrument, and who executed theforoonlno Instrument ao haslher free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therain mentioned WITNCU my hand and °Meoiot seal hereto aMxad the day and year in this oentfloata above written Print/Typo Namo NOTARY PUBLIC in and fit tho State of Washtnpton, raatd►np a My appo►ntmont ewperos lecelvecf: 9/25/02 1 : 23PM; 09/28/2002 13:08 FAX 200 343 8403 •••■• • • 4 • 1 •. 114411 1111.#410•••••- .0 .• , • a .1...6 •■•• ■• 4, 200 343 8403 - r E01NAfiUS, J1t:1l, �M1 1 navut. urn. e.e.�., .,y. , Pacific NW Title U8 - , (21015 STATE Ott HAWAII ) )ss COUNTY OF HONOLULU) On this, ...__„day of, _ , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and forth* States of Wawau, duty commissioned and sworn, personally appnarod Heron frig to me known to be, or haWng shown satisfactory evidence of being, the General Partner of Heron lag Investments Limited Partnership, the corporation that axocuted the foregoing Instrument as general Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Umitad Partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary net and daetid of said corporabon as such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath utatad that she was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed la the corporate seal of said corporation General Partner. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year to this certificate above written STATE/ OR WASHINGTON ON COUNT' OR KIN O c On this ,1D4'k des of th D � y , 2002. boforex max, ra and ®ref n *d, a Notary Public in and for thq St to V}{p t ton, my commissioned and sworn oroonofly appoarad before me a t• , to me known to bo, or having satisfactory madonna of bang, the partn r of sattte Tacoma xecutnre Proportion Limited Partnartahlp, a Limited Partnership, and having C`J on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the Instrument, and who executed the /orogorng Instrumentals ON his/her free and voluntary act and dood for the uses a, - - • - ones therein montioned )se Print/Type Name NOTARY pUGLIC In and for the State of Hawaii, residing at My appointment oxpiresr r■ WITNESS my hand and official soar her o a • o • -, day god yea r�t this co } fiesta above written. ■••- .,4448 u,, .41 �t Sr r•� • 4..• ••��••'•.• .y,. • • 'I•,A,plllll•111111�11� Pnn • a Nomo NOTA ° Y PUBLIC in and f the Slate pf. Washington, rosldino a� �r,' My appointment explros —b Recoivetl: 9 /2b/U 1 :GJP M; 09,2 §2002 10:09 PAX 206 040 9400 r11 Irr•1 •"• • r • o N• • 1 • • rYW •■•,i,••■••••• • • • GVC Cu,, Fjuu, u•,1..I 1, .JIVl 1 11 Pacific vt1! Title ,G'9 • uy.- (21019 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING r On this 1 y of * , 2002, before me, the undersi. n =d, - N • - ry Public to and for the State of Washington, duty commissio ed and sworn personalty doe red to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the �- ,- . - - - - -. ,.,..= of stock Market institute of Learning, Inc, f/k/a Wade Cook Seminars, Inc, Uk/a United support Association, the corporation that executed the foregoing Instrument, and having on oath stated that he /she/theywee/were authorized to execute the Instrument, ecknowledged•the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act end deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein menboned WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto • ed the day and year In this certificate above wntten )SS &L.4 4! ,52•,, f:r■ ciA 'q�. ''LL c CZY 1 Pk- 1 A 4.4 /, ;. _ tit∎ . PnnvType Name NOTARY PUBLIC on and fqt the $tate Washington, residing at My eppomtment expires 9 • ZZ 0'+ \ Received: 44/2b /0 'L 09/28/2002 13:08 FAX 208 343 8403 GVV J•+0 ..'. Vu..M1�uV,Vaur,V.oa...uuv�.u� •yaw..+, . ,.y,. Pacific NW Tittle U8 0 017 EXHIBIT A Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded In Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington; Except to strip along the Easterly side thereof, condemned for road in King County Superior Court Cause No. 109001; Except the North 250 feet of said Lot 2, as measured along the West line thereof, And except the following described portion thereof It- 1 Beginning at the Intersection of the North margin of South 149th Street and •' the Southwesterly margin of S S H No 5 -M, said point being at right angles ON and 30 feet from station 108 +27,35 of said highway, c Thence N 22 °46'00" W along said highway 365,31 feet; CZ) Thence 8 89.38'22" W 139 18 feet, "Cy- Thence 5 22.48'00" E, parallel with said highway, 243 91 feet, CV Thence 3 88 °39'00" E, mallet with the North margin of South 149th Street, ON 43 30 feet, • Thence S 03 °21'00" W 100 28 feet to the North margin of said street, N Thence S 86'39'00" E along geld North margin 148.61 feet; O Thence N 66.41'00" E 0.59 feat to the point of beginning e-V "^1 • I, • N • At . I • • 9' • • ., P� 1 • • ' -`� e •.. . • r : • • , ni 444 F r • cd RETAINING WALL PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Retaining Wall Preservation Agreement is between Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "Helen Ing Investments') and Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a W s tingten limited partnership ( "STEP "). 1. Helen Ing Investments Property, Helen Ing Investments owns the real property described on the attached Exhibit A ( "Lot A "). The Helen Ing Investments property is Lot A as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006. 2. STEP Property, The STEP property is legally described on the attached Exhibit 9 ( "Lot B "). The STEP property is Lot 9 as shown on that surrey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006, 3, Retaining Wall. There is a common boundary between Lot A and Lot B which consists of the common boundary line on the east side of Lot A and the west side of Lot B which runs for approximately 243.91 feet in a northerly /southerly direction where the upper east boundary line of Lot A meets the west boundary line of Lot B (the "common boundary line "), Helen Ing Investments has constructed a retaining wall along a portion of the common boundary line as shown on the attached Exhibit C. The purpose of the retaining wall is to stabilize a slope which runs from Lot A down to Lot B. 4. Effect on Deve /opmont. This agreement confirms the parties' joint understanding that any excavation or other work or development (the 'work'') which might disturb or Impact the soils in the vicinity of the retaining wall, and especially at the foot of the retaining wall on Lot B, may affect the stability of the retaining wail and can be safely done only after consulting with a qualified geotechnical engineer, The geotechnical engineer is required to confirm that the manner in which the work is being done will not adversely affect the stability of the retaining wall and the hillside, 5. Restriction to Protect Wall. The parties agree that neither party will take any action which might disturb the soils it the vicinity of the retaining wall, including, but not limited to, at the foot of the wall on slope 9 or which may adversely impact the stability of the retaining wall or the hillside stabilized by the retaining wail. The prohibited activities include, but are not limited to. excavating at the foot of the retaining wall or otherwise removing soils which are needed to support the hillside and the retaining wall, Any such activity shall be undertaken after consulting a qualified geotechnical engineer to confirm that the manner in which the work is done will incorporate any necessary measures to adequately protect the stability of the retaining wall and hillside. 8. Covenants Running with the Land. The covenants contained In this Agreement ran with the and described on the attached Exhibits A and B and are for the benefit of the present owners of the described land and their grantees. heirs, successors and assigns. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership By: Helen ;rg Its: General Partner Date: Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited ' Partnership, a' " tin°iimited partnership Its: Date. 1 1 g 1 Rece sved: 9/ 6:02 :3 : 5 s PM; 1 dUCI yua aril By: P.E.; 18089470909; Sent by: EOWAROS,StEH,SMITH&G000EA1EN0 206 624 0809; "12 /1U2 e:u5r-M;nIMA ,ryJu,rayc .41a Sep-6-02 1 : 38PM; Page 4/6 RETAINSNG WALL PRESERVATION AGREEMENT This Retaining Wail Preservation Agreement is between Helen trig Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "Helen Ing investments ") and Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "STEP") 1. Helen Ing Investments Property. Helen ing investments owns the real property described on the attached Exhibit A ("Lot A') The Helen Ing investments property is LotA as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006. 2, STEP Property. The STEP property is legally described on the attached Exhibit 8 ( "Lot B`). The STEP property is Lot 8 as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006. 3. Retaining Wall. Thera is a common boundary between Lot A and Lot 8 which consists of the common boundary line on the east side of Lot A and the west side of Lot 9 which runs for approximately 243.91 feet in a northerly /southerly direction where the upper east boundary qne of Lot A meets the west boundary line of Lot 8 (the "common boundary line`). Helen Ing Investments has constructed a retaining wall along a portion of the common boundary lino as shown on the attached Exhibit C Ths purpose of the retaining wall is to stabilize a slope which runs from Lot A down to Lot B. d. Effect on Development. This agreement confirms the parties' joint understanding that any exCavetion or other worts or development (the "work ") which might disturb or impact iha soils in the vicinity of the retaining wail, and especially at the foot of the retaining wall on Lot 8, may affect the stability of the retaining wall and can be safely done only atter contsulting with a qualified geotechnicmI engineer. The gootechnicat engineer is required to confirm that the manner in which the work is being done will not adversely affect the stability of the retaining wall and the hillside. 5. Restriction to Protect Wall. The parties agree that neither party will take any action which might disturb the soils in the vicinity of the retaining wall, including, but not limited to. at the foot of the wall on slope B or which may adversely impact the stability of the retaining wait or the hillside stabilized by the retaining wall. The prohibited activities include, but we not limited to, excavating et the foot of the retaining wall or otherwise removing soils which are needed to support the hillside and this retaining wail, Any such activity shall be undertaken after consulting a qualified geotec finical engineer to confirm that the manner In which the work is done will incorporate any necessary measures to adequately protect the stability of the retaining wail and hillside 0. Covenants Running with the Land. The covenants contained in this Agreement run with the land described on the attached Exhibits A and 13 and Are for the benefit of the present owners of the described Jana and their grantees, heirs, successors and assigns. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Washington limited partnership By: Helen Ing 45: General Partner Date.,,._.,,,,_ ....r _..�... Partnership, a Washington limited partnership Ry: Its Date:_, STATE OF HAWAII ) )ss. COUNTY OF HONOLULU ) On this day of 2002. before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Helen Ing, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing Instrument as General Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Hawaii, residing at My appointment expires On this )jay of le,4002, before me, the and rsi npd, a bilotary Public in and for the State i si n and sworn, personally appeared �U Ll r 8 . IL CIA. , to me known to of Hawaii, duly comm s o e , p y pp be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the r " of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Wasottefr I mited partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing if : r -nt as "`'of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a . -•`:•".t• - • limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such ,, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed t day and year in this certificate above written, PrintVType Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and fgr)the State of Washington, residing at r + r r . 'r. lt. 1,!,1!!)r My appointment expires L,,,1 Received: 9/ 6/02 3:52PM; .eat By: R.E.; 1 dUdY•+1U U9 CU,YrlMIJ. ,�i.er,, on•i •••uuuvu• ..��...., • .. y, .. ., 18089470909; Sep-6-02 1 :38PM; Page 5/6 went oy: huwAHUs,5it:H,5MITH66000F'RIENb 206 824 0809; 08/27/02 3:05PM;j.tlri: y936;Pago 5/5 STATE Or HAWAII COUNTY OF HONOLULU On thle.; ,,d ay of , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned rid sworn, personally a eared Helen rig, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the ..�. _ ,� of Helen ing investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as General Partner of Helen in investments Limited Partnersnip, a Washington limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as suds General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the use and purposes therein mentioned. and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument. W1TNE9S my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in thls certificate above written. ,. L a. 1 A P r '• , 'r .. r .. , •t t�ASHINOTON ��1rri.11j) ` COUNTY OF KING `)ss• Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in e d for a Slate of Hawaii, melding at Pi- — My appointment expires -- On this at , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public to and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me Known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as of Seattle Tacoma Executive Pmporlies Limited Partnership, a Washington ilmited pertnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and dead of said corporation as such , and of said Limned Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath slated that he /she was authorized to execute the said instrument, WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed trio day and year in this certificate above written, PrinVType Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, reesiding al My appointment expires EXHIBIT A LOT A LOT 2, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT A STRIP ALONG THE EASTERLY SIDE THEREOF, CONDEMNED FOR ROAD IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO 109001; EXCEPT THE NORTH 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 2, AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION THEREOF: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF S.S.H. NO. 5-M, SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND 30 FEET FROM STA1 ION 108 +27.35 OF SAID HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 22'46'30" WEST ALONG SAID HIGHWAY 385.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'37'52" WEST 139.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22'46'30" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY, 243.91 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 88'39'00" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET, 43,30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03'21'00" WEST 100.26 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88'39'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 148.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 65'41'00" EAST 0,59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT B LOT B THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SSH #5 -M, SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND 30 FEET FROM STATION 108 *27.35 OF SAID HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 22 °48'30" WEST 111,37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 22 °46'30" WEST 253,94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 637'52" WEST 139,18 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 22 648'30" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID HIGHWAY 243,91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 639'00" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET 143.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. COVENANT REGARDING POTENTIALSLIDEAREA WHEREAS, the property is located in a potential slide area as defined in the City of Tukwila Municipal Code section TUC 18.45.020, and as a condition of the issuance of construction permits that this covenant be signed, acknowledged and recorded in the records of King County; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that consistent with 1519. 1524 Lakeview Blvd. Condo. Ass'n v. Apartment Sales Corp., Wn.2d 43 P.3d 1233 (2002), this agreement constitutes an arms length, bargained -for agreement, which includes a waiver of liability that runs with the land for risks created by the proposed use of property because of the shape, composition. location or other characteristic unique to the property sought to be developed. NOW THEREFORE, Helen Ing Investments.Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "Owner") agrees as follows: 1. Owner will Inform its successors and assigns of the property described in Exhibit A that the property is in a potential slide area, cf the risks associated with development thereof, of any conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City, and of any features of this design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soils changes. 2. Owner on its behalf and on behalf of its hairs, successors and assigns hereby waives any right to assert any claim against the City for any Toss, or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting frcm soil movement by reason of arising out of the issuance of the permit(s) by the City for development on this property except only for such losses that may directly result from the sole negligence of the City. 3. Owner will maintain continuous insurance coverage as required oy the permit authorizing the development. Dated this 24th day of AU`JUSt , 2002, HELEN ING INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 8 ' -' - Helen Ing Its General Partner 1 STATE OF HAWAII ) )ss, COUNTY OF HONOLULU ) On this `' day of A- f--; 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly co issioned and sworn personally appeared Helen Ing, as the general partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrumeEtt, and acknowledged to me that she signed and smiled the said instrument as her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day end year in this certificate above written. 5 Pont/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the S to of Hawaii, residing at �L�Li' ,,•- - frt w. � My appointment expires ,� —r 2- — e %/— EXHIBIT A Lot 2, interurban acditicn to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington; Except a strip along the Easterly side thereof, condemned for road in King County Superior Court Cause No. 109001; Except the North 250 feet of said Lot 2, as measured along the West line thereof; And except the following described portion thereof: Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of South 149th Street and the Southwesterly margin of S.S.H. No. 5•M, said point being at right angles to and 30 feet from station 108 +27.35 of said highway; Thence N 22 °46'00" W along said highway 36531 feet; Thence S 89 °38'22" W 139,18 feet; Thence S 22'46'00" E, parallel with said highway, 243.91 feet; Thence S 86.39'0C" E. parallel with the North margin of South 149th Street, 43.30 feet; Thence S 03'21'00" W 100:28 feet to the North margin of said street; Thence S 86'39'00" E along said North margin 148.51 feet; Thence N 65'41'00" E 0.59 feet to the point cf beginning, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is between Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "Helen Ing Investments ") and Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a lAleeitpgtorr limited partnership ( "STEP "), 1. Helen Ing Investments Property. Helen Ing Investments owns the real property described on the attached Exhibit A ( "Lot A "). The Helen Ing Investments property is Lot A as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006, 2. STEP Property, The STEP property is legally described on the attached Exhibit 9 ( "Lot B'"). The STEP property is Lot B as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006. 3, Retaining Wall. There is a common boundary line approximately 243,91 feet long between Lot A and Lot B which consists of the common boundary line on the east side of LotA and the west boundary line of Lot B as it runs in a northerly /southerly division. Helen Ing Investments will be constructing a retaining wall on Lot A along a portion of this common boundary line. The purpose of the retaining wall is to stabilize a slope which runs from Lot A down to Lot 9, The installation of the wall will cost Helen Ing Investments a substantial sum. 4, Effect on Development, This agreement confirms the parties' Joint understanding that any excavation or other work or development (the "work ") which might disturb or impact the soils in the vicinity of the retaining wall, and especially at the foot of the retaining wall on Lot B, may affect the stability of the retaining wall and can be safely done only after consulting with a qualified geotechnical engineer, The geotechnical engineer is required to confirm that the manner in which the work Is being done will not adversely affect the stability of the retaining wall and the hillside. Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership By: Helen Ing Its: General Partner Date: 1 Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a W+shlen limited partnership mut', a Its Date: Received: 9/ 6/02 3:5tPM; 180894(UYuy 3r,t By: R.E.; 18089470909; ,;ant by: EOWAROS,91EH,SNITH&000OFRIENn 208 624 0500; Sep-8-02 1:37PM; Page 1 08/27/02 3:05PU;htfeg N936;Page 2/5 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is between Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ("Helen Ing Investments ") and Seattie Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washtngten limited partnership ( "STEP "), /%. z _i 1. Haien Ing Investments Property. Helen In Investments owns the regal property described on the attached Exhibit A ( "Lot Al. The Helen Mg Investments property is Lot A as shown on that survey recorded under King County Recorders receiving number 20020513900006. 2. STEP Property. The STEP property is legally described on the attached Exhibit 8 ( "Lot 9 "), The STEP property is Lot 9 as shown on that survey recorded under king County Recorder's receiving number 20020513900006. 3. Retaining Wall. There is a common boundary line approximately 243.91 feet long between Lot A and Lot 8 which consists of the common boundary line on the east side of Lot and the west boundary Meta( Lot 8 as it runs in a northerly /southerly division. Helen Ing Investments will be constructing a retaining wall on Lot A along a portion of this common boundary line. The purpose of the retaining wall Is to stabilize a slope which runs from Lot A down to Lot 8. The installation of the wall will cost Helen Ing Investments a substantial sum 4. Effect on Development. This agreement confirms the parties' joint understanding that any excavation or other work or development (the work ") which might disturb or Impact the soils in the vicinity of the retaining wall, and especially at the foot of the retaining wall an Lot 8, may affect the stability of the retaining wall and can be safely done only alter consulting with a qualified geotechntcal engineer. The peotechntcal engineer is required to confirm that the manner nwnicn the work is being dono will not adversely affect the stability of the retaining wall and the hillside, Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Washington Limited partnership By Helen Inv its. General Partner Date. Partnership, a W.sr+irtgton limited partnership �•• 4r i J 8Y _ Deto STATE OF HAWAII )SS. f COUNTY OP HONOLULU On this day of , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Helen Ing, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as General Partner of Helen ing investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written, Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Hawaii, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this , 'bay of Sr poi OW, 2002, before me, the undersigned, p Noto Public, in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 41;11/.1 ( . L' ..r)C , to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Vltirsttep`,nited partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a n limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and aid corporation as such , and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the said instrument, ".-h WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed, ,he day and year..in this certificate above written, l Id 1 I Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and f Washington, residing at My appointment expires w the Slat of • 2 -"' Received: 9/ 6/02 3:511,m: 1 ti J U d•• 1 4.44.6.. 6rt 8y: R.E,; 18089470909; Sep-6-02 1:37PM; Page 2 Sent by: EDWAROS,SIi:H,SMITH &0000FRIEND 206 624 0809; 08/27/02 3:05PM ;his 0938;Pege 3/5 STATE OF HAWAII COUNTY OF HONOLULU On this '' day or , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commission and sworn, personally appeared Helen Ing, to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the �,�..�...•�d- Pra.,�.i of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited paMership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as General Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such General Partner. and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath :slated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument. ,::WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in thls cenificale above written, .L'! A r t• . it ' r . • S s ..,P 1.) 44 417':, ,. IS?AITI'4P 'VAS HINGTON COUNTY OF KING Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in an for the State of Hawaii, residing at Pi-0 ! .L My appointment exp res "'2 — i- -d On This day of , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and swam, personally appeared _ ., to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence at being, the of Beattie Tacoma Executive Propenles Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership, the coiporation that executed the foregoing Instrument as of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Pennership, a Washington limited partnership, and acknowledged the said Instrument to be the free and voluntary act and decd of said corporation as such , and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the said instrument, WITNESS my hand and official :zeal noreto affixed the) day and year in this certificate above written. Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC In and for the State of Washington, residing a1 My appointment expires 2 EXHIBIT A LOT A LOT 2, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT A STRIP ALONG THE EASTERLY SIDE THEREOF, CONDEMNED FOR ROAD IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO, 109001; EXCEPT THE NORTH 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 2, AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION THEREOF: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF S.S.H. NO. 5-M, SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND 30 FEET FROM STATION 108 +27.35 OF SAID HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 22'48'30" WEST ALONG SAID HIGHWAY 365.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'37'52" WEST 139.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22'46'30" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY. 243.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 139'00" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET, 43.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03'21'00" WEST 100,26 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID STREET; THENCE SOUTH 88'39'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 148.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 85'41'00" EAST 0.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 J EXHIBIT B LOT B THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SSH #5•M, SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND 30 FEET FROM STATION 108 +27,35 OF SAID HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 22646'30" WEST 111,37 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 22 646'30" WEST 253.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'37'52" WEST 139,18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22648'30" EAST PARALLEL TO SAID HIGHWAY 243,91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86'39'00" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149TH STREET 143.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. RETURN ADDRESS: ROBERT G. SIEH Edwards Sieh Smith & Goodfrierd, P.S. 701 - Sth Avenue, Suite 7170 Seattle, WA 98104 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT RETAINING WALL AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership. a h}na Limited Partnership; Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc. f /k/a Wade Cook Seminars, Inc, f /k/a United Support Association GRANTORS: GRANTEE: Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: The North 250 ft, along the West line of Lot 2, of Interurban addition to Seattle, as per Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, Records of King County, Portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington. Portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats. Page 55. records of King County, Washington. ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL/Acc0UNT NUMBER: 359.700.0023.05, 359. 700.0021.08, 359700.0020.09 THIS INDENTURE is made by Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, aes+a Limited Partnership, and Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc. f /k/a Wade Cook Seminars. Inc, f /k!a United Support Association, hereafter called the Grantor, and Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, hereinafter called Grantee, WITNESSETH; 1. Grant of Easement. For and in consideration of valuable benefits the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, Grantor grants and conveys an exclusive easement for the urposes described in paragraph 3 across the property described in paragraph 2. 2, Legal Description of Easement. The property subject to the easement is located in King County, State of Washington. The property subject to the easement is composed of two parcels, legally described as follows: Parcel One: That portion of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, Records of King County, Washington, described as follows; Beginning at the intersection of the Northerly margin of South 149th Street and the Southwesterly margin of SSH #5 -M, said point being at right angles to and 30 feet from station 108 +27.35 of said highway; Thence N 22 °46'00" W 111,37 feet to the point of beginning; Thence continuing N 22 °46'00" W 253,94 feet: Thence S 89 °38'22" W 139.18 feet; Thence S 22 °46'00" E parallel to said highway 243.91 feet; Thence S 86 °39'00" E parallel to the North margin of South 149th Street 143.31 feet to the point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. Parce Two' The south seventy (70) feet of the real property described as; The North 250 Feet, as measured along the West line of Lot 2, of Interurban Addition to Seattle, as per Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County: Except that portion, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot; Thence South along the West line of said Lot 250.00 feet; Thence North 89737152" East 178.40 feet; Thence Northwesterly to a point on the North line of said lot which is North 89'37'52" East a distance of 10.00 feet from the point of beginning; Thence South 89737'52" West 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of said exceptions; And except that portion of Lot 2 of Interurban addition to Seattle, as per Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55. Records of King County, described as follows: Beginning as a point on the North line of said Lot 2. Tying south 89 337'52" West 145.13 feet from the intersection of said North line with the Southwesterly margin of Interurban Avenue South (the Southwesterly line of the Northeasterly 40 feet of lot 2); Thence North 89 337'52" East, 59.56 feet to a point on a curve to the right with a 160,00 foot radius and initial radial bearing of south 22°13'28" East, Thence Southwesterly on said curve an arc of 122,06 feet and central angle of 43 °42'40" to the North line of said lot 2: Thence North 89'37'52" East 59,56 feet to the point of beginning, as conveyed to the City of Tukwila by recording no. 9309081289; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. 3, Purpose of Easement, 3,1. This easement is for construction and maintenance of a retaining wall, roughly parallel to, and west of the westerly property line of the real property described in paragraph 2 above, and for construction and maintenance of a drainage system associated with the retaining wall installation, together with associated drainage facilities such as swales, The retaining wall is being constructed on the real property described in Section 4 below, and the associated drainage system is being constructed on Parcel One described in Section 2 above. The rights granted under this easement include ingress, egress and access to the property described in Section 2 for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wall and drainage system, including, but not limited to, the temporary placement of such trucks, drilling machines, earth moving equipment, and any other equipment used for the construction and maintenance of the drainage system, and for related activities, including, but not limited to, temporary placement or storage of soils and fill, materials used in construction and maintenance. temporary buildings or trailers, placement of fencing, and all other acts reasonably necessary or advisable for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wall, 3,2. Grantee agrees to complete, at its sole cost and expense, the work necessary to construct the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities in a professional and workmanlike manner as soon as reasonably practicable following execution of this easement by Grantor. but in no event later than October 31, 2003. Grantee also shall complete the work in accordance with all applicable building codes. laws. rules, and regulations, and shall obtain the permits and approvals necessary for such work, if any, Grantee shall keep the property free and clear of liens and other encumbrances arising from or relating to the construction, repair, restoration or maintenance within the easement area. If Grantee fails to do so, or to otherwise meet its obligations hereunder, Grantor, may, but is not obligated to, pay such costs and expenses arising from or relating to Grantee's breach, and bill Grantee for Grantor's casts. If Grantor is not reimbursed within 30 days from the date of 3 1) billing for its costs, Grantor may have a lien for the unpaid costs placed upon Grantee's property. 4, Property Served. The easement is for the benefit of the real property described as: See attached Exhibit A. 5, Restoration of Property. Grantee shall not be required to perform any restoration of Grantor's property following initial construction of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities. Upon completion of construction, Grantee shall thereafter, following any maintenance of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities, restore the Premises described in Section 2 above to its condition prior to the maintenance, 6(a), Reservations by Grantor, Except as may be required for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities described in Section 3 above, nothing in this easement gives to anyone the right to interfere with the use by Grantor, its officers, employees, agents, guests, or its successors or assigns of the easement in common with others as defined in this easement document. 8(b), Grantor may, at its sole expense, re -route the drainage system when and if it chooses to install its own drainage system which would be adequate to provide the same drainage as the drainage system to be installed and maintained by Grantee. Upon installation of any drainage system by Grantor which replaces or re- routes the drainage system installed by Grantee, Grantee shall have no further liability of any kind to Grantor arising out of the drainage system installed by Grantee. 7. Hold Harmless. Grantee shall pay, defend, indemnify and hold Grantor, its officers, employees, agents, guests, customers, and grantor's successors and assigns harmless from any liability for injury to persons or damage to property arising out of the construction or maintenance of the retaining wall. which is on the real property described in Section 4 and which roughly parallels the north -south common boundary between the real properties described in paragraphs 2 and 4, or out of the construction and maintenance of the drainage system and related facilities, except for liability caused by the negligence or greater fault of Grantor or Grantor's agents, representatives, contractors, guests or others on Grantor's property through Grantor, 8. Successors and Assigns. The terms of this easement are for the benefit of, and shall also bind, the heirs. successors and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. 9, Covenants Runnier With the Land. The covenants contained in this easement run with the and described in this easement and are for the benefit of the present owners of the described land and their grantees. heirs, assigns and successors, a§ 1g 10. Attorney's Fees. In the event of a dispute over the terms of this easement, or enforce the terms of this easement, the prevailing party shall be paid such party's attorney's fees and costs, including, without limitation, reimbursement of any expert witness fees, and the costs of mediation, arbitration, trial or appeal. 11. Ei_jjklAgfigaoLut This easement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties. 12. Netiees4 Notices given hereunder shall be given by (i) personal delivery: (11) ovemight courser, (iii) telecopy or fax followed by first class mail; or (iv) certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses under each party's signature below. A party may change its address by written notice to the other party. Notices shall be deemed to be received and effective (1) when personally delivered; (11) one day after the date of forwarding by overnight courier, (Hi) on the date of telecopy or facsimile with confirmation if the data of receipt is not a weekend or holiday, or if a weekend or holiday, then on the next business day; or (iv) if sent via certified mail, an the date of receipt GRANTEE HELEN ING INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , Helen Ing, General Pam 5 GRANTOR SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Authorized Representative STOCK MARKET INSTITUTE OF LEARNING, INC. F/KJA WADE COOK SEMINARS, INC. F/KIA UNITED SUPPORT ASSOCIATION its: Autrornzea Representative /4 1 10, Attorney's Fees, in the event of a dispute over the terms of this easement, or enforce the terms of this easement, the prevailing party shall be paid such party's ttorney's fees and costs, including, without limitation, reimbursement of any expert witness fees, and the costs of mediation, arbitration, trial or appeal, 11. Entire Agreement. This easement contains the entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof and no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties, 12. Notices, Notices given hereunder shall be given by (i) personal delivery; (ii) overnight courier; (iii) telecopy or fax followed by first class mail; or (iv) certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses under each party's signature below. A party may change its address by written notice to the other party, Notices shall be deemed to be received and effective (i) when personally delivered; (ii) one day after the date of forwarding by overnight courier; (iii) on the date of telecopy or facsimile with confirmation if the date of receipt is not a weekend or holiday, or if a weekend or holiday, then on the next business day; or (iv) if sent via certified mail, on the date of receipt. • • GRANTEE HELEN ING INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Helen Ing, General Partner GRANTOR SEATTLE TACOMA EXECUTIVE PROPERTIES LIMIT D ARTNERSHIP, A D N LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I s; Authorized Representative STOCK MARKET INSTITUTE OF LEARNING, INC. F /K/A WADE COOK SEMINARS, INC. F /K/A UNITED SUPPORT ASSOCIATION B its: Authorized Representative 0§ STATE OF HAWAII ) )ss. COUNTY OF HONOLULU) On this `1' day of ,, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned andtsworn, personally appeared Helen Ing to me known to be, or having shown sadsfactory evidence of being, the General Partner of Helen Ing investments Limited Partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as General Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to oe the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation General Partner. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. Print/Typa Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and far the State of Hawaii, residing at / '''''/.)"" �^�-- r�rr.. My appointment'expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss, COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared before me , to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the partner of Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a Washington Umitod Partnership, and having on oath stated that he /she was euthortxed to execute the Instrument, and who executed the foregoing Instrumentals hiafier free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this cortificate above written. PnntR'ypo Name NOTARY PUBLIC In and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires ig STATE OF HAWAII ) )ss. OUNTY OF HONOLULU) On this day of , 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Hawaii, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Helen Ing to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the General Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument as General Partner of Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation as such General Partner, and of said Limited Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation General Partner. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this ,_Q_ day of Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Hawaii, residing at My appointment expires OA /SG%, 2002, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for th i St to cg shington, �C1uIy commissioned and sworn personally appeared before me [( ,, to me known to be, or having 9 satisfactory evidence of being, the partnor of Battle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership. a'A " Limited Partnership, and having on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument, and who executed the foregoing instrument as hle /her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses /nd- pa+goses therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto of el day and year 1~ this ce ificaat}e above written, ,61 , // ' ' V ',1 i1 Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC n and f the State of Washington, residing at • 1 't VC My appointment ex ires s 4- STATE OF WASHINGTON OUNTY OF KING )ss, On this 16ay of , 2002, before me, the undersign d, a,Not. ry Public in and for the State of Washington, duly conimissio ed and sworn personally appeared , : , . r�. , to me known to be, or having shown satisfactory evidence of being, the 1.0 of Stock Market Institute of Learning, Inc. f/k/a Wade Cook Seminars, Inc. f /k/a United Support Association, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and having on oath stated that he /she /they was/were authorized to execute the instrument, acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto s .ed the day and year in this certificate above written. Print/Type Name NOTARY PUBLIC In and f the State of Washington, residing at �j e re-e, CO . U.14 My appointment expires 1 ^ 27rd S 7 EXHIBIT A Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, in King County, Washington; Except a strip along the Easterly side thereof, condemned for road in King County Superior Court Cause No. 109001; Except the North 250 feet of said Lot 2, as measured along the West line thereof: And except the following described portion thereof: Beginning at the intersection of the North margin of South 149th Street and the Southwesterly margin of S.S.H. No. 5 -M, said point being at right angles to and 30 feet from station 108 +27.35 of said highway; Thence N 22 °46'00" W along said highway 365.31 feet; Thence S 89'38'22" W 139.18 feet; Thence S 22 °46'00" E, parallel with said highway, 243.91 feet; Thence S 86 °39'00" E, parallel with the North margin of South 149th Street, 43.30 feet; Thence S 03 °21'00" W 100,28 feet to the North margin of said street; Thence S 86 °39'00" E along said North margin 148.51 feet; Thence N 65 °41'00" E 0.59 feet to the point of beginning. Grading Quantities Hilicrest Apartments Total Cut (CY) 457 Net cut this estimate Project No.: 2781. Date: 25- 3u1 -02 By: MPI Total rill (CY) 402 55 cubic yards Section Cut Ave End distance Volume Fill Ave End distance Volume .. (sf). (sf) (ft) _ (cY) _00 (sf) . (sf) .. (ft) (cY) 0t25 129 0+75 100 1 +25 46 1+75 7 1+82 65 25 60 6 25 5 11 115 50 212 19 73 50 135 84 50 156 149 27 50 49 111 50 205 15 50 28 72 4 7 1 36 7 9 CUT: 457 CY 497 CY TOTAL CUT F11.L: 402 CY 535 CY TOTAL FILL Page 1 AvG % 1 2002 0 .,i ,...:..1\1(.,:::,,,1:,,, ..... 7/26/02 2781 ttilicrest: Apartments page 1 STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST TRAPEZOIDAL BASIN ID No. T1 Description: Trapazoidal Pond Length: 16.00 ft. Widt}h: 10.00 ft. Side Slope 1: 3 Side Slope 3: 3 Side Slope 2: 3 Side Slope 4: 3 Infiltration Rate: 0.00 min /inch / o 7c-e'/ yo EVERGREEN ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. LAND USE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEEPING 8625 Evergreen Way, Stale 104, Everett, Washington 98208-2620 Phone: 425-513-2500 Fax: 425-355-1307 SIIttt HO or CAL COI A I En IIY °ME CI !ECM) IlY OA t E =Alt • °`.0 -2.3 -9 7 /g ya. 10: YD. 3i0 s 7 v3 Vie,r I,- tr /6 /--bEv• o , o- *chr iz 58 /4 e maw 704 11W.5retol205 1 Owed) EVERGREEN ENGINEERING SERVICES INC, LAND USE PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEEPINCA 8625 Evergreen Way, Suite 104, Everett, Washington 08208-2020 Phone: 426-513-2500 Fax: 425-355-1301 JOS SI IEE or CALCUI Al tt) SY_ tMtE CICKthUY E SCALE sei 5P te—aW-C /.570 0°1; Fa. cLoPa` natio toi usolie Was) It4 I troir4 File: M102-0038 • 35mm Drawing #16-2. 1 ./2002 14:12 2062850614 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 02/02 OCT-21-02 MON 12 :54 PM WIN vxELw nAPT151 CHuPCH 425 of 61 6958 g B. Ewelt, landscape architect 18845 BE Rest" WA 98058 425.432,1587 October 21, 2000 Mr, Rob Thompson CT Engineering 180 Nickerson St Seattle, WA 98109 Re: Landscaping for Hilicrest Apartments, Tukwila, WA Deer Rob, There has been some question as to the advisability of installing the plant materials In the drain swat. at the bottom of the retaining wall u sty per landscape plan. The plants that I selected for that area tend to be adaptable to wet soli and should perform su Mcleatly; weN so as .to actas both ground cover end to soften Te.appea anus of the netainingAildimhich, I was b id at the beginning at the project was an.imponentdesIgn concern: Mything else planted In that aree even coveItn¢wilks layer o! r c $ would.aoon be overrun with weeds and would not provide the sinning deeirs+d4 If you iiave,antfutther'questions, please call me. P.di PCDZIO3S-' City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor September 29, 2003 Mr. Jeffrey Ing Hillcrest Associates C/o Gran, Inc. 1021 — 1" Avenue W. Seattle, WA 98119 RE: Building Permit # MI02.038, Hillcrest Apartments retaining wall. Dear Mr, Ing: I have received a copy of your E -mail regarding a request for extension to the expiration date of the above referenced permit. Please note that every permit that is issued under provisions of the Uniform Building Code expires by limitation if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within 180 days after the permit is issued. Your request for a 30 -day extension to the expiration date is hereby granted. Consequently, if work has not commences on or before November 3, 2003 your permit will then expire and a new permit must be obtained before the work may proceed. The fee for a new permit will be one half the original permit fee, provided that no changes have been made to the plans and provided that the permit has not been expired for more than one year. If you have any questions you may call me at 206/431.3675. Since obbrt Benedi Building Official RSB /rsb cc: Steve Lancaster, Director D.C.D. File #MI02 -038 Phone: (206) 433.1800 • City Hall Fax: (206) 433.1833 Jeffrey Ing cell: (808) 561 2182 email: pogo811@yahoo.com fax: (501) 325 2268 September 26, 2003 Mr. Steven Lancaster Director of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 SEP 2 9 2003 •.ii.itJNfTY bEvLELopM NT RE; Building Permit #M102 -038, Parcel 3597000020, Hillcrest Apartments 14891 Interurban Av South Tukwila, WA Dear Mr. Lancaster; My grandmother, Helen Ing, owns the Hillcrest Apartments in Tukwila. Building permit M102 -038 for a retaining wall expires on September 30`x1. 1 recently came to terms with the contractor Condon Johnson, who will be building the wall. 1 learned yesterday, that Condon Johnson's insurance agency, will not provide a performance bond to parties (The city of Tukwila) that do not have a direct contract with Condon Johnson. This means 1 will have to seek the performance bond from outside sources. Unfortunately, the bonding process will take some time as the bonding company needs to understand the situation. 1 am told that it is like applying for a loan. 1 respectfully request a 30 day extension of the permit while 1 obtain a performance bond to satisfy requirement #27 (Prior to commencement of work, contractor performing the work needs to submit a performance bond for 150% of construction cost ) of the building permit. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, —.....**)--- Jeffrey Ing Family Representative city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 17, 2003 Robert Thompson 180 Nickerson Street Seattle, WA 98109 RE: Permit Application No. MI02.038 14891 Interurban Av S — Hilicrest Apartments Shoring Dear Permit Holder: In reviewing our current records the above noted permit has not received any Inspections by the City of Tukwila Building Division. Per the Uniform Building Code and /or Uniform Mechanical Code, every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void If the building or work authorized by such permit Is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit Is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work Is commenced for a period of 180 days. Based on the above, you aro hereby advised to: • CaII the City Of Tukwila Permit Center at (208) 431.3070 to arrange for an inspection. This Inspection is Intended to determine If substantial work has been occomplishod since issuance of the permit or last Inspection; or If the project should be considered abandoned. If such determination Is made, the Building Code door allow the Building Official to approve o one•tlmt #xtanalo un to 180 days. Extension requests must bo In writing and provide satisfactory reasons why circumstances boyond the applicants control have prevented action from being taken. In the event you do not call for the above Inspection or request and receive an extension prior to September 30, 2003, your permit will become null and void and any further work on the project will require a new permit and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation In this matter, Sincerely, Stefanie Spencer Permit Technician Xo: Permit File No, M102.038 Bob 8enedicto, Building Official 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206.431.3670 • Fax: 206.431.3665 1 city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 27, 2002 Mr. Rob Thompson CT Engineering 180 Nickerson Street Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 RE: Hillcrest Apartments Slope Stabilization, Permit application # MI02 -038. Dear Mr. Thompson: I have reviewed your request for an extension of the plan review period for this permit. You are hereby granted a one -time extension of 180 days in which to complete the plan review process and obtain a building permit. If, for whatever reason, you are unable to complete tho plan review process your application will expire by limitation and the plans and other data will either be returned to you or destroyed. The plan review fees may not be refunded, and in order to renew action on this application, it will be necessary to pay a new plan review fee. 1 trust that your goal to provide a total response to the plan review comments by October 41h is on schedule. We are looking forward to completing this application process so a permit can be issued, you can build your retaining structure and we can all move on If you have any questions or need any assistance from the permit center please feel free to call the Permit Coordinator or me at (206) 431 -3670. Sin Robert Benedicto, Building Official cc: Brenda Holtz, Permit Coordinator Joanna Spencer, Engineer 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431.3665 '09/::7/2002 11:50 206285064 8 E N C I N C E- K 1 N C, PLLC FAX COVER SHEET CT ENGINEERING PAGE 01 RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2002. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11:24 PHONE: 206,431.3196 DATE: TO: PROM: September 27, 2002 Robert Benedicto Rob Thompson TIME: 180 Nickerson Si, Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206)28:- 4512(V) 006) 285.0618(F) nhompson®ctengintering.coa RE: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SLOPE STABILIZATION: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF APPLICATION: PROJECT 0: S$1$3 CITY PERMIT NUMBER: MI024311 CC: PILE Bob SI.h Fax: (204)1244109 Lowell Ina Fax: +1 (109) 9474909 Jeff Ing Fax : +1(601) 326 -2249 4.91201 Man Murray Fax: +1 (425) 310 -1307 JIm Finley/ James Strange Fax: (426) 7479661 1 -3$194 Number of pages Including cover sheet: 1+ 0 Message Deer Robert, We understand (from our telephone discussion today with Stefanya from your otrico) that ow permit application (number M102.038) has expired thb month. We would limo to humbly request an extension to iho permit application period, In fact we are poised to re- submit to the City in a msaor of days, but havo boon dealing with some unfortunate timing issues relating to sliming and recording of necessary documentation u required by our permit correction letter. We have bun in close communication with the City during tho last number of weeks, but have been directed that our re- submittal will only be accepted with ALL required corrections ,and paperwork in place (no partial re- submittals). Wo hope to have our response to the City submitted by end of next week October 41 2002, We trust that thb extension rcquost moots with your approval and loo1i forward to your positive response to same. Do not hesltato to contact me if you have any questions, or if I can assist in any other way, Regards Rob Thonapsoii Structural Engineers FUR CMS* Su axss\Fa-91110.711.dos Department of Community Development 6300 Southoenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 96188 Phone: (206) 431.3670 Fax: (206) 431-3665 City Of Tukwila Pages: S. 0 Wen! Onter Review 0 Please Common! 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle •Commenlst OZ-D3$ 1: 9•• TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT (SEP 27 '02 04:4/PM) 11 TUKWILA DCD/PW .................N.NL.fa1.. 111........ 1. N... H.... N......... N....... N ................................... N..... N.. ...........N..NN.........H..... 146060 O . N.14.... THE FOLLOWING FILES) ERASED 1 FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 085 TRANSMISSION 9 *2062850619 02 OK (AUTO) 646666 OOOOO 411604110.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06114110611/101016101116611110611111401114 ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION 1E1 CT E N G I N E E R , N G PLLC FAX COVER SHEET atim RECEI Y EV SEP 30 .1002 DL , 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 285.4512(V) (206) 285.0618(P) rthompson@ctengineering.con DATE: TO: FROM: September 27, 2002 Robert Benedicto Rob Thompson TIME: 11 :24 PHONE: 206.431.3665 RE: HILLCREST APARTMENTS SLOPE STABILIZATION: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF APPLICATION: PROJECT 0: 98183 CITY PERMIT NUMBER: MI024138 CC: FILE Bob Sieh Fax: (206) 624.0809 Nelson- Nakats Fax 06)484 -6372 Stave -Kits Lowell Ing Jeff Ing Mike-Rappoport Allan Murray Jim Finley/ James Strange Joanna-Spencto--- Oerard- Qeuehel F_x+(426)492 -4474 Fax: +1 (808) 947.0909 Fax : +1 (601) 326.2268 -- —Fes (413) 71$ -0207 Fax: +1 (426) 365.1307 Fax: (426) 747.8661 Fax 204H434 4s6-F-Y1 Fa>Kr- (204► - 406.477 _ r Number of pages Including cover sheet: 1+ 0 Message Dear Robert, Wo understand (from our telephone discussion today with Stefanya from your office) that our permit application (number MI02.038) has expired this month. We would like to humbly request an extension to the permit application period, In fact we are poised to re- submit to the City In a matter of days, but have been dealing with some unfortunate timing issues relating to signing and recording of necessary documentation as required by our permit correction letter. We have been in close communication with the City during the last number of weeks, but have been directed that our re- submittal will only be accepted with ALL, required corrections and paperwork in place (no partial re- submittals), We hope to have our response to the City submitted by end of next week October 40, 2002, We trust that this extension request meets with your approval and look forward to your positive response to same, Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, or if I can assist In any other way. Regards Rob Thompson Structural Engineers File: C :1Robs Stun\Faxes■Fx•881e3.78.doc a Og City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 27, 2002 Robert Thompson 180 Nickerson Street Seattle, WA 98109 RE: Permit Application No. MI02 -038 14903 Interurban Avenue Dear Permit Holder: In reviewing our current records, we have not received your response to the City's incomplete /correction letter mailed to you on July 17, 2002. Your permit application expired on September 21, 2002. I have enclosed a copy of your application for your reference, If you choose to pursue your protect, a written request for an extension of your application will need to be received at the Permit Center within five (5) business days from the date of this letter. This will be your only opportunity for an extension to your permit application, In the event we do not receive your written request for extension, your permit application will become null and void and your project will require a new permit application and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation In this matter. Sincerely, .,,,,•fi t - t, i r (4 e-oc .4 1 Stefanie Spencer Permit Technician Enclosures Xc: Robert Benedicto, Building Official Permit Filo No. MI02.038 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 11100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431.3670 • Fax: 206.431.3665 itgililiCONVERSATION RECORD DATE: �7 rEsuN u TIME: id, TYPE: d Visit ❑ Conference feTalephono— 0Incoming 'Outgoing Name of person(s) contacted or in contact with you: 7.C�rsyadt�✓ •rgani`zatian (office, dept., bureau, etc.) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIVED CITY OF 7ukvviLl4 SEP 2 7 2002 "ERMIT CENTER Location of Visit/Conferen Telephone No.: SUBJECT: "h..tor.rdz-eve SUMMARY: 1 et �t F August 6, 2002 city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James F. Morrow, RE., Director Mr. Ing Helen Ing Investments 1522 Aleva Drive Honolulu, HI 96817 Subject: Hillcrest Apartments — Retaining Wall M102 -035 Geotechnical Peer Review Dear Mr. Ing: I am enclosing a copy of City of Tukwila Purchase Order No. 15401 in the amount of $2,800.00 for the third geotechnical peer review by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Seventy (70) percent of the review was completed (see attached Shannon & Wilson Invoice #0000066174 for $1,960.00). Please make the check in the amount of $1,960.00 payable to City of Tukwila (budget account # 000.13.532.200.41.00) and mail It to: Ms. Joanna Spencer Public Works Department City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Thank you for your prompt attention and assistance. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 433-0179. Sincerely, Joanna Spencer Development Engineer JJS :Iw enclosures: P.Q. No. 15401 Invoice No, 0000066174 cc: Gran, Inc. Gail Labanara Development File (P;Laurie Admin/Joanna/Lcucr Mr fns 08060:) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206.433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - :131.3065 r CITY OF TUKWILA --�. DEPT f we- 15401 ._._._,..._ CODE 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 • (206) 433.1800 SHIP TO VENDOR NAME & ADDRESS C5Miti/VOL/ me--54`.1 ti 11C. S G2/ DEPT, THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL PACKAGES, INVOICES, AND CORRESPONDENCE, DATE ED VERBAL QUOTE STREET ADDRESS TUKWILA, WA •...4 rti.. ' "a.l .•UANTITY ZGu.t•:!, ;'fi il'''lV+,,y!ri! a'. .,it. .i, .t.1 `•... r 41 . •att. »,_ V...?!. .:,:#;;"g'►s DESCRIPTION' ;.s I ? r' `1'a"•", %:! .1t41IXP•,i,t ,.' .,,:, •.r.i, ;.r.. }yfrr ,: t tFUND'. ' DEPT , 8ASU9 ' - mow, ELEMEN't'OiJ: jr,. �. ••,, U 6 _ 't AMOUNT 13r-d , ee4 4/44.i -44a.' LeAd. 000 f 3 5301 „Pell 'f' GCS 0,,,? @d. ``' 01111■11111Y■•■ 1 OTHER SOURCES DEPARTMENTAL APPROVAL EXECUTIVE APPROVAL QUOTE QUOTE Fed. I.D. 091-0745357 400 N. 34th St., # 100: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnleal and Environmental Consultants P.O. Box 300303 Seattle, Washington 98103 06934 CITY OF TUKWILA Attention: MS. JOANNA SPENCER P W D / ENGINEERING DIVISION 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD., #100 TUKWILA WA 98188 JOB REFERENCE GEOTECHNJCAL ENGINEERING SERVICES H11LCREST LANDSLIDE REMEDIATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON THIS PERIOD FROM: 05/05/02 FAX # (206) 633 -6777 Telephone: (206) 632 -8020 PURCHASE ORDER NO.: PWE -15401 MVVOICE DATE 06/24/02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT OR PURCHASE ORDER TOTAL TO DATE 06/15/02 AUTHORIZED PEE 2,800.00 '`PREVIOUS BIWNOS JOS NO 21109711 01 oua THIS PERIOD 001 3RD PEER REVIEW Lump Sum 70% Complete 1,980.00 Invoice Totals RETAIN THIS COPY 1,960.00 1,980.00 1,980.00 OK TO PAY a mss• c; :." 4.. ,q. S.' i.a •1 2 5 Please pay from this invoice--Net 30 days—Late charge 1.3 ?10 per month on past due accounts July 17, 2002 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Robert Thompson 180 Nickerson St, Seattle, WA 98109 RE: CORRECTION LETTER !l1 Development Permit Application Number M102.038 Ililicrest Apartments Shoring 14903 Interurban Av Dear Mr. Thompson: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit can be approved, All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the► same tlnw and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from tho Building Division, Planning Division and Public Works Department. At this time, the Fire Department has no comments, Please address the attached comments in an Itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation, The City requires that four (4) gpinplele za of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to bettor expedite your resubmittal, a `revision sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience, 1102,11111ilkIMILLMILIIIIMILIMIL1112111211112Mairdis 1 .! 1. 11 .. 1 11:.1 1 1 1 .1 1. 1 If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 431.3684, Sincerely, NQittcar►J Kathryn A. Stetson Permit Technician encl xc: File No. M102.038 IL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206. 431.3665 } City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431.3670 Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mall, fax, etc. Date: Plan Check/Permit Number:�OZ��3 g ❑ Response to Incomplete Getter 11 ® Response to Correction Getter h _1_ ❑ Revision # after Permit is issued Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: • t t II 'I 1.1 1'. 14903 Interurban �v S Summary of Revision: Phone Number: Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: Entered in Sierra on 07/17/02 Og { flUILDING DIVISION REVIEW Tukwila Building Division 6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3670 Date: April 3, 2002 Project Name: Nilicrest Apartments Shoring permit application Application #: MI02 -038 Plan Review: Ken Nelsen, Senior Plans Examiner A general Building Department plan review has been completed of the subject project, Before the permit may be issued, the applicant must provide a formal letter from the adjoining property owner granting their approval for access and construction staging as shown on the plans, No further comments at this time, MEMORANDUM To; Brenda Holt From: Art Pederson Date: July 17, 2002 Re: Planning comments pertaining to Miscellaneous Permit File # MI02 -038 Hilicrest Apartments Landslide Stabilization Wall The submitted plans for File # MI02 -038 are consistent with the submitted plans for the related SEPA File # E02 -008. However, the approved landscape plan included with File # E02 -008 must be installed prior to final miscellaneous permit approval. Additionally, the property owners of the Hilicrest Apartments shall grant to the City and record to their title a covenant, to run with the land, exculpating the City from liability from damages caused by any future soil movement. This covenant must be recorded with the King County Assessor and a copy of the recorded document must be submitted to the City before the miscellaneous permit can be issued. Sample covenant language is included below: SAMPLE COVENANT WHEREAS, the property is located in a potential slide area as defined in City of Tukwila Municipal Code section TUC 18.45.020, and as a condition of the issuance of construction permits that this covenant be signed, acknowledged and recorded in the records of King County; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that consistent with 1519 —1525 Lakeview Blvd. Condo. Ass'n, v. Apartment Sales Corp., - -- Wn.2d - - -, 43 P.3d 1233 (2002), this agreement constitutes an arms length, bargained -for agreement, which includes a waiver of liability that runs with the land for risks created by the proposed use of property because of the shape, composition, location or other characteristic unique to the property sought to be developed. NOW, THEREFORE, Owner(s) agree(s) as follows: 1. Owner(s) will inform his /her successors and assigns of the property described in Exhibit 'A' that the property is in a potential slide area, of the risks associated with development thereon, of any conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City, and of any features in this design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soils changes. 2. Owner(s) on his /her own behalf and on behalf of his /her heirs, successors and assigns hereby waives any right to assert any claim against the City for any Toss, or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from soil movement by reason of or arising out of the issuance of the permit(s) by the City for development on this property except only for such losses that may directly result from the sole negligence of the City. 3, Owner(s) will maintain continuous insurance coverage as required by the permit authorizing the development. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: June I*, 2002 PROJECT: Hil!crest Apartments Shoring PERMIT NO: MI02 -038 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1, Typical Pile Detail 1 /SS1 calls for 36 piles but shoring elevation on A /SS2 shows only 34 piles, Please clarify and revise your plans. 2. Shoring plan sheet SS 1 calls for 33 equal spaces between piles #1 and #34; however, the dimension line is placed between pile #1 and fold line at pile #30. Modify the dimension line to show 33 spaces between piles #1 and #34. 3. Provide earthwork calculations for grading activity to include: cubic yard of cut, cubit yard of fill, and cubic yards of earth to be imported and or exported from the site. Grading and wall design have changed since your old submittal under permit M199.0091; however, sheet Cl still shows exactly the same earthwork quantities, Show correct earthwork quantities on C -1. 4. Roof downspouts from the existing building shall be tightined and connected to the existing parking lot storm drainage system. Additional catch basin may need to be added in the parking lot, This shall eliminate the need for vertical pipe at the face of proposed retaining wall at the north end. Please delete roof drain detail AA /C -2, S. Boundary line adjusment was completed for subject property. Please show new property lines and revise legal descriptions on drawing 1 of 3 accordingly. Copy of recorded City of Tukwila boundary line adjustment No. L01 -067 is attached for reference. Label parcels A,B,C & D on plan. 6. Label the rip rap pad at out fall from storm drain pipe at existing Swale in Interurban Ave S. and show rip rap pad detail. 7. The owner needs to obtain to obtain a temporary easement for construction from the property owner to the north and to the east. 8. Also PW needs a memorandum of understanding signed by the owner of property to the east acknowledging development restrictions along east strip of lot B due to placement of new wall on Hillcrest Apartments property. Upon wall completion proper convenant to run with the land recorded against lots A and B addressing steep slopes /landslide area and any limitations,restriction in area of influence created by new wall. 9. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. peer review dated May 31,2002, faxed to CT engineering on June 3 and June 6, 2002 is attached, Please address all their comments. 10.Due to the nature of the project applicant shall submit a copy of the Certificate of Insurance verage (minimum of $ 1,000,000) naming the City of Tukwila as additional insured, construction cost estimate and a performance bond in the amount of equal to 150% of the construction cost. =1111 SHANNON i,LSON, INC. W1 fit= OTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS SEATTLE RICHLANO PORTLAND FAIRBANKS ANCHORAGE DENVER SAINT LOUIS May 31, 2002 FritSCSrif r~ JIM K City of Tukwila TUWILA Department of Public Works PUBLIC; WORK =' 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer RE: THIRD -PARTY REVIEW FOR PROPOSED LANDSLIDE REMEDIATION, HILLCREST APARTMENTS, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON At your request, we have reviewed the following documents regarding the proposed landslide mitigation measures for the Hillcrest Apartments, Tukwila, Washington: 1. Shannon & Wilson's letter dated March 21, 2000, titled "Third -Party Review for Proposed Landslide Remcdiation, Hillcrest Apartments, Tukwila, Washington." October 20, 2000, letter by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Review of Plans — Gcotechnical Concerns," 3. February 15, 2001, latter by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Response to Third Party Review." 4. Shannon & Wilson's letter dated May 16, 2001, titled "Response to Third Party Review Comments Prepared for Proposed Landslide Rcrnediation, Hillcrest Apartments, Tukwila, Washington." 5. July 10, 2001, letter by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Retaining Wall Design Parameters, Landslide Remediation." 6. A table of responses prepared by Geotech Consultants /CT Engineering regarding Shannon & Wilson's March 21, 2000, letter received via facsimile on July 11, 2001, 7. August 3, 2001, letter by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Response to Third Party Review." 8. Revised Structural Calculations by CT Engineering labeled M102 -038 dated November 1, 2001. 40U NORTH 34TH STREET • SUITE 100 PO. BOX 300303 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98103 206.632.8020 FAX 206695.6777 TOP: 1.800.833.8388 21 -1 -09711 -001 City of Tukwila Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer May 31, 2002 Page 2 SHANNON %WILSON, INC. 9. Drawings C -1 through C -3, Rev. 3 (01- 31 -02) and Drawings SS1 through SS2, Rev. 5 ' (04- 26 -02). 10. February 15, 2002, Letter by Geotech Consultants, Inc. titled "Review of Plans." 1 i Our review consisted of an evaluation of the appropriateness and applicability of the supporting i� data, assumptions, and calculations that were used in the design. No attempt was made to perform independent stability analyses or wall design. R 6 We offer the following comments: 1 i 1. Drawing C -2 indicates that fill will be placed on a 2 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (2H :1V) slope yl in front of the northern end of the proposed soldier pile wall to support a drainage swale. 3 Drawing SSI indicates that backfill behind the wall should consist of free - draining pit -run g gravel overlain with topsoil. Will similar material be used for placement in front of the wall to support the drainage swale? If so, should the drainage ditch detail BB, shown on Drawing C -3, be modified to include some type of liner or impervious soil to allow water to actually flow into the ditch toward catch basin CB —1, rather than seep into the ground i below the wall? 2. We reiterate comments 4, 13, and 18 of our March 21, 2000, letter. Note that CT Engineering's response received via facsimile on July 11, 2001, indicates that the drawings would be updated to address these comments. It dots not appear that this has been accomplished. The comments are repeated herein: • Comment 4 in our March 21, 2000, letter. Plans indicate that fill is to be placed. Specifications for the fill material and compaction requirements should be specified on either the Shoring Plan or the grading plan. Although the plans indicate the "backfill behind the retaining wall shall be structural fill per Geotechnical Engineer Spec. Provide free draining pit -run gravel," we recommend that the specification for this material be more complete, or tied to an appropriate City of Tukwila, Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT), or American Public Works Association (APWA) standard specification. The required compaction criteria should also be specified. • Comment 13 in our March 21, 2000, letter: The plans indicate that fill will be placed behind a portion of the wall. Compaction equipment could impose surcharge pressures on the wall unless specific measures are 21.1.0971 I.001.1.1/WP /Ikd 21 -1- 09711 -001 k City of Tukwila Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer May 31, 2002 Page 3 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. taken to reduce this surcharge. The geotechnical report and Sheet SS2 of the Shoring Plans do not discuss compaction- related measures to discuss such surcharging. The wall design should include pressures for equipment, material, or other surcharges anticipated to be imposed during construction. As an alternative, the plans should include any limitations on compaction equipment so that additional loading considerations are not required in the design of the wall. ► Comment 18 in our March 21, 2000, letter: The Final Grading and Drainage Plan indicates that swales will be constructed in front (east) of the wall and along the north end of the downslope property to collect and route surface water. The plans also indicate that water from the roof drains from the apartment building will be tightlined down the wall and surcharged into a Swale on the slope. In our opinion, discharging water from the roof tightlines onto the slope could contribute to additional instabilities on the lower property. The geotechnical engineer should address this condition and its impact on slope stability. Consideration should be given to collecting and discharging collected water from the roof drains and the newly installed catch basin CB -1 to the storm drainage system via tightlines. It is also our opinion that surcharge water from the upslopc property (Hillcrest Apartments) should be collected at the top of the wall. The surcharge water collected at the top of the wall should be discharged to the Hillcrest Apartment storm drainage system. 3. Drawing SS 1 identifies the dimensions of the timber lagging. There are no calculations that support these dimensions. We also recommend that a detail be provided on the plans that shows the limits of the lagging relative to the base of the wall and the soil located in front of the wall. We note that some maintenance of the timber lagging should be anticipated for this permanent facing, 4. Drawing SS1 indicates that the wall will be monitored on a weekly basis, How long will this monitoring be performed, during construction only, or for some duration after construction? 5. The stressing procedures identified on Drawing SS 1 for the Test Anchors and Production Anchors are not typical. In addition, it is our opinion that the creep criteria for anchor acceptance is too high (unconservative). We concur with the proposed number of Test Anchors (two per soil type) and the maximum stressing load (200 percent). We also concur with the maximum stressing load (135 percent) for the Production Anchors. We recommend that the intermediate stressing loads, the load hold durations, and the creep acceptance criteria, however, be modified to follow the recommendations outlined in 2.1.O97 11.001 • U /WP /1kd 21 -1- 09711 -001 City of Tukwila Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer May 31, 2002 Page 4 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. "Recommendations for Prestressed Rock and Soil Anchors," Third Edition 1996, by the Post - Tensioning Institute. 6. Drawing SS2 specifies a tendon bond length, hole diameter, and tendon force. It appears that a 12- inch - diameter hole is being considered for the tieback bond zone. In our opinion, drilling a 12- inch - diameter hole into weathered rock for a bond length of 22 to 27 feet may be difficult with tieback installation methods that are typically used in the Puget Sound area. It may be more appropriate to specify a minimum bond length, inclination, and required tieback force and then allow the Contractor to choose the hole diameter and the actual bond length based on their proposed installation methods. This performance -based approach may actually reduce costs and potential Contractor claims during construction. 7. Drawing SS3 shows a typical tieback detail. The anchor connection to the soldier pile should be detailed. Hole diameters, plate thicknesses, and weld dimensions on the soldier pile should be provided along with supporting calculations. In addition, the following minimum information should be included on the detail: ■ The overlap distance on the 4- inch - diameter, 12- inch -long pipe and the corrugated sheath should be specified. • The area behind the anchor block and outside the tieback sheath within the drilled hole immediately behind the soldier pile should be filled with grout or some other corrosion inhibitor. • Provisions for filling the "cover cap" should be provided, i.e., vent holes and grease /grout plugs. • The 5- foot -long tail should be cut off prior to placement of the "cover cap ". It should not extend through the cap. • The grout -filled tendon hole shows two different symbols for grout. Are the grout types different? This review has been prepared for specific application to the project at this site, as related to the geotechnical aspects discussed herein, Within the limitation of scope, schedule, and budget, our review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. 21.1.09711.001.1.1/WP /lkd 21 -1 -09711 -001 City of Tukwila Attn: Ms. Joanna Spencer May 31, 2002 Page 5 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project, and trust this letter meets your needs. We would be happy to discuss these comments with the City of Tukwila and CT Engineering, as appropriate. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (206) 695 -6845. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Gerard J. Buechel, P.E. Vico President OJB /lkd 21.1.09711.041. UIWPIIkd 21-1-09711-001 tklUwO ttMAL OtSMf/1RONI PtR Mr RtPORh (0t AI (0? 1. INItPURRAN AOAMON TO StAMC. ACCO OIAO TO 1141 fIA? MOREf RtCOROtO W 01141,E 10 Or PI.At . PACE S1, iN KM O COUNTY, 11,1110,0 ►ON, [A'CtP? A MO MONO tUt [A1RRRY 10t 14tMtOr, CONO(•tn 0D! NOM Rl AMMO COUNTY NAVIN" COURT CAUSC NO 1010011 Mt01 MC WIN ISO TINT Or IMO (Or 1, Al M(A110t0 AMINO 1111' MC1? tRMt 1Nt11t011 AND LA'CCPt tHt r0110MWO O4 ON K° Pa0011 04Rt0f, KtRAWN7 AT Mt WIti1C0t10N Or Mt NON w MARGIN Or 1011114 1004 111!111 ANO Mr 10UINKIRRIY WARMS Or 1. 111. NO. 1.u, 140 PAN? MHO At IOW AMU TO AND JO MI MOM 1tAt10N IOMLJ! 11 MEN 1119111 W 130IlU1 04[1,11 11141.10'14_ ,111.17 PAN /lift tom /A* ICUIM 11?JJ rttr MtNtt 106'!'001, PARA41(1 WM MC NORM WARM Or =OH 1411111 11114 ?, S4.19 ftl?, MI *110.111•00'W 10011 fttr TO MK NORM UAROW Cf 140 n/Mtll NI/' /1'00 a ur 110 10/0 NORM a o (00140/at r[ltl (or I, 04/1 P01110W Or (Of ? MIRRMMMN AOdt1ON 10 KART(, ACCONONIO 10 ?NC OLAI motor rums* W SVIUMI 10 Of AAIL PAC 99 A(C01OI Of *NO COMM IMPIW0r0l, DOOM AS 1N� 11OU11 001 lIPWIt?RiV 0 ffMCi1111,1 YAM Or 111 !"1, JAC PONY KM At fall MOM�( �104 A�PO il0 (ter 1MOW fce►Ar 10111Or K fM 1 n►Mg I�cOMIMIton NIIfI' t01*11![1nnK 1 0f/ t10011PA10 110,,1) 10 (1(N!1 11I'.110OOf J OARPAt1 tlri0 OR Nam ,MOW Or IOUMI 19111 1111141 t0 PC P0111 Of 010101010 OMAR IN OR 40411100 co, IONO, PAR 0r MA11MN01ON. 1URKTDNf ADAJ1R0 ((0A4 OCICRM?N11S: N(w10FAi 101 1 01111110100/1 000110? 10 Korn 000000100 10 MC RAT ??(He I A(CORO(0 W 1.0141,4 10 Or 0(411 PAOC !1v W 01110 COUNTY, WAA6►MION, 11c(,1 A 9100 MONO INC 1A11(R(Y SO4 M(1(01 C0?0(WN(0 ►a ROAD W I WO COUNTY NTP(RT0 COW CAW 110. 1010011 (0(401 OW NOON 100 1111 Or 140 (Of 1, Al W(AWUR(0 410114 n1C 149110111 114A(Or1 AND c11C80r MK (01,101140 041,111(0 POMPON 04(0(001 0(01111010 At 01( WI(AKCRON Or MK Nan? ,MOW Or 1041111 1 1041 1111110 ANO n1( 1041MM(!1(RLY MMOIN Or 1114 NA 0=11. 1A0 PONI Or goo 491111401 101114 1 FNf1 ►11111'00'11 MCNO 1 NOWAY 111.Ij7T „1! 1(1f• MKNC( 111411,1111 1,1111 ►4400 nCNCC !71'11'00'1, 'ARAM; 0104 IMO WOIIMN; 71,111 rrrr; M4NCX IM7000(. PARAILE( IMn? nit NORM MARGIN 0 SOON III, ITh.EE? IJJ4 ff(r� MORS 50111'00'W 101171 r((r 10 MC NORM WARCI? Cr !O0 PIKER n4NCF 101'.1600'0 At0W0 SA0) NORR/ HAAGN 141.51 far; nlLNc( 1199'/! 00'( 031/111 10 M( PM? Or KGINNY 0 AO? tar 0; THAI POR 0G? Of 4011. W IERUROAN Amnon 10 $40111,, ACCOROWO TO M( PLAT MICRCOr R(C00140 W YDtU11( 10 or ,EATS. PAGE 14 R(COROS Of MHO COUNTY, 9A51RNGION, O(ICRIOEO Al 031011(; 'COMM At MF filINS(CnON Of fl4 NORPN RLY MARGIN Of sown 14901 510((1 AND MC 5OUD4 (STCMY MMGW Or 3514 13.14 SA0 PON? DCINO or MGM? ANGUS TO ANO 110 rr(► mow STATION 106 *77.33 Or SAID ?10104Y; 114(114( N77'1600'W 111.31 FEU 10 MC POW Or 8CONNINO; TIENCC COIITYKNNO 1477'16'90'01711.94 TECT,• ngIICE 50/:11'77•0 130.11 ITET; MKNCC 571'4600'C PAR4LU1 10 SAM 16GMWAY 713.91 run MCNCC 5$'33'00'0 PARALLEL TO MC NORM HMG* Of SOU, 1110? S►RCC, 140.31 rccr ro MK POWr qF 517VATE W INC C4UN►Y Or KING. SIAM Of WASH,NGION. �6ea s edu DtEtMAMWI 1ftli Of 1141C 11Rtittlt1 IMO Of TUC 1011111110140 00O11Nry0(1Atlrtt Of tl� tN WNW WHOP W 00 1.010 Or 1141 SAM& ANO TS 9410 A0.11111411t /1 MAO[ WM n*i1N14f1f * 1110(3 r*HOC& or MAW MI OUR HA M11AND MA(J C1N1tRia7 14 /1/11 p WAMPAIS towns All 1 ,►94411 Mol 1t11 l lIerStr/N, (P 11 01 0011 14MVAt101r (WI01f MIAI ON 6/04 14 044 RECEIVED JUN 2 6 200Z PUBLIC WORKS ,1 pi l ,1141n616 • 101 p rll. 11(1111 p N 111IWv 1411 1 Off p 104 1•IIVK1 IV tl (*Kt M41 gtft(11 11 NIt N WM74(6 10 ivitriMSIPUKolitiiim �� n r 1 Niv((1 101 nl•ro(( (9 w1ltNrrpl 41 ... 1 Mew, OIIO /Y1. C.��,e�.► ..� 1~/p~,iii��, 040440,• Or.•_� �1"...;...`J_.. '1�Q% , t f 191041 ;( 41!1 '!' ' w 4►P17M11101I 1WPE1 V0041L� 'r �f !1!111'' Yom,` �II1M�' .. APPROYAt A(M1M[0 ANO 40010110 M 114' 9.091 11100101001 C011Wrrt( AND 11418? t(RNIt° TOM? 111.010 033,/,,,.,0,10 Orj.M1, HOOP. V711808 , 44evr lsairtecirttl• RMro 10114?? O(PANTIMN1 Or A11t11MtN11 11AM0410 Al1D 011040 ttALI ,UAY 00J4u,1 , 7001. FRegAmMeNgi- haiiflf n Iitu31..1 4(1000(0'1 C1111W1CA iC 0f/ 161.. riff/ Ir l!rfwg 104IJ.•,401 H 700%11..,1, u 11 644. 34..11 ,M,A.N.,..RI oft. ..111 11 ?A/ r0 IN 9l 0'10,1+000;,7 /T: �,/ • ' axa,...at1M�...., t✓l�p W M: tirgi r RIIM d• qi SURI(YDN'S C(0101801( m4 •0P w'lINy folume III • IWrf7 ,mN4 01 MI if 014401 011 4+111,,1 N 4MIM0NIM VIM 10/ 109VYfmIM11 ft 1f/• Survir Ricy,oket Aii RI 101 rrfvf11 .I...1.411L14 *140.ItPtilm11114 ....... C?f4!R..R:..IU►t......... CM1;11f11f N. 11UIS fare PPP" 4,9 IMO MAIL NOM IiIA0V4N. •A61r0TOr 90941 ‚Al, 14111f1.4v. CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT HO. L01•007 IN TILE NE1 /4 OF SECTION 23, T23N, RIE. oM►? 87K (1140 0Y 1Tr R. KITZ 041C SCALE 1 "050' X10 HO. 09045 514011 1 Or 2 s. 147TH sr, • • • \\ \\ I.1.: 0024 ANAINIONAIMMAININIP ♦ 4111;00041 A.011110 01 10 U19.41 TLC \ V1111,141: !O PIUI' in Iwi er IIII IN IX 1.1. 0!177 ,.....,.._ a a .7 ds41 i%O (1b d /.S`•t ,..7...71!+4 A 1.74 74,1:11 /Nil '6011411 Mot! 211011•10M4 COA 01 moo t =WV, %U110(14WINWIlt 1 zArzi R A l iNp. r f t7 l rrn$"11fl IIN1S I�j►[ ••M 11 ACM 141.1.4 110.14"1"" r 1.1.• p,i0 14, 0071 1 1,4, 0070 I r 14. 00411 I I 1 \ 1 1 I I 1 1 11. 0'077 1 I 4' \ 4' ..... 8. 149TH 8 T. apr ...+ •.. ,.,.......�� ..Rup /It 1wi 11/411 T.1.. y, • LOT 77 moo " 4/ moo S. 140TH 8T. oq A ►r.pa • • • T.1.. 60440 101 ':7 r... _.......,...- p.�5 ,; . .� JUN 2 ti 2002 PU131.10 INO K URAI'IIIC SCALE 1 lW PM 1 1 1•A • i1 it LtOtte . • Qr r/1' 141 nto Ia/ ost to Ili tom . • Idlli Al NIIRO jrilik41 Mini 'Mum YY x� x x RtCf/IOtR'i C(W)1101'. ..... ... .................. rr•q llr motif 1111.,.,,....10 /1 ....,,.,.,. t00•.•,Ih• •.,Y in ► t A••.,,..•...N•.,•.•„•.,.,,•.,01 lti....• II INN /tpnl N „ . ,.,,..RiTAZ 44:41 Ti...,. SOKYON'S CC1111►0CA!C rm. '.+.i It'•tIp► t /tell I Nervy "44.ly wog 1✓ wilief my di..IW I. 1'sl.nn•nit ..IA IAI ►.g1i..P.•11 •r IM. Syrrr.0 l0(f� ' i Ail 41 IAI toques( .1...NtUN..010 W►[31111Rn3..., h...itP. 1....7091. Ctrl+rKtlt No If11i •.., WI Nil i All uMtl IRIS NO M 01110(11(4 W/Mw111911 11111 F fl, 141t$11.dI1I CITY OF TUKWILA LTOUNDARY LIP E ADJUSTMENT NO. 1.01.051 114 THE NE1 /4 OF SECTION 23. 123H, R40. olt/ 9r io9 RRITZ OR. KITZ DA 1E 0 /01 SCALC 1'.50' 40100. gtP491‘ 2 OF 2 4° 11 P t C" H is -f REEN LEERING CES INC. 'LANNING • CIVIL ENGINEERING 8625 Evergreen Way, Suite 104 Everett, WA 98208 Phone: 425-513-2500 Fax: 425-355-1307 R. ALAN MURRAY, P.E. Designed by KAO Drown by, KAO Checked by RAM Issue Date :10 -21 -99 No. IS E D Revision 8y Date El PER CITY OF TUKWILA COMMENTS KAO 01- 20-00 2 PER CITY OF TUKIMLA COMMENTS RAM 10 -10 -00 PER STRUCTURAL CHANGES MPI 01-31-02 H IIEIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP MPI Reid icictleton May 7, 2002 File Nn. 26- 02- 005 - 004 -02 Mr. Bob Benedict° City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Building Permit Plan Review - Final Submittal 1=11ilcrest Apartments Shoring (M102 -038) Dear Mr. Benedicto: We reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tukwila. The applicant has responded successfully to our comments. Enclosed are one complete set of the structural drawings (bound with the originally submitted architectural drawings) and an additional copy of the revised structural sheets. We are also forwarding the structural calculations, geotechnical report, and correspondence from the engineer for your records. if you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call. Sincerely, Reid Middleton, Inc. Ky e K. Ya atsuka, P.B. Pr ect Man ger h: ldcc\ 26s u\ planrevw \tukwila•O21t004r2.dcc\kky Enclosures cc: Robert Thompson, CT Engineering PLLC Engineer' Planned Surveyor' Washington Oregon Mogul Reid Middleton, Inc. 728134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 Ph: 425 741.3800 Fax: 425 741.3900 p L L C Reid Middleton Inc. Attention : Kylie K Yamatsuka 728 1346 St SW; Ste 200 Everett, WA 98204 Fax : 425.741.3900 Re 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206)285.4512 Pax: 285.0618 May 1, 2002 Project : I- Iilicrest Apartments — Shoring Wall — Slope Stabilization Project Number : MI02 -038 File Number : 26-02-005-004-01 Dear Kylie, Attached are revised construction documents for the above project. We have reviewed the drawings and construction documents according to the above letter. Specifically our comments are : 1) Revised documents: a) Please find enclosed the revised construction documents for the above project. 2) Large depths of Fill : a) The geotechnical engineer has confirmed use of fill material behind the retaining wall as indicated on the dwgs in section 1/5S2. (see attached letter) 3) Tieback Inclination a) It is necessary to install tiebacks at steep angle for the following reasons i) Tiebacks must be embedded into the weathered rock region below the clay layers. ii) The tiebacks must be installed in such a way to not affect future underpinning work related to the building structure. b) Therefore, it is confirmed that a steep tieback angle of 45 degrees is required. 4) Shotcrete wall facing : a) This an omission. There is no shotcrete wall facing on this project, The lagging will be exposed, and this will be the permanent wall facing, 5) Timber Lagging Design: a) Use 4x12 lagging down to elevation 35.0ft. Below this level use bx 12 lagging HF #2, b) The bottom of the lagging has been included on the dwgs. Structural Engineers File : C:Utobe Stial ctictskorr•98I83 -0S.doc t Attention: Kylie K Yamastika Reid Middleton April 26, 2002 Pile lief : 26.02.00S -004 -01 6) Reference Cut : a) The cut has been revised to read 3 /SS3. 7) 50 ksi yield strength: a) Piles are to be 50ksi — the note on A/SS2 has been revised. 8) Tieback schedule : a) The pile schedule has been revised to include pile #30 I believe that this letter addresses all of your concerns in regard to the above project, and trust that the plan review may now be completed. If you have any questions, please call. Sincere' CT En Structural Engineers Reid icldteton April 5i 2002 File Nd. 26 -02- 005 - 004 -01 Mr. 13ob Benedicto City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd,, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED APR -- 8 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Subject: Building Permit Shoring Plan Review - First Submittal Hillcrest Apartments Shoring (M102 -038) Dear Mr. Benedicto: We reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tukwila. The permit applicant should address the following comments. Copies of this letter were forwarded to the Engineer for your convenience. 1. The following list of comments should be responded to in itemized letter fon% The permit applicant should have the Engineer of Record respond and resubmit two copies of revised structural drawings and one copy of supplemental calculations. MI Information should be submitted directly to Reid Middleton, Inc. 2. The letter from Geotech Consultants, dated 8/3/2001, states that "large depths drill shown on the civil plans should not be placed." Sheet SS1 indicates an area of fill to be placed at the northeast end of the proposed wall. Verify that the comment by Geotech Consultants does not apply to the fill shown on the shoring plans. 3. A 45- degree angle of inclination for the tie -back anchors is indicated on the SS drawings. Plate 1 of Geotech Consultants 8/3/2001 letter indicates that the tie -back angle of inclination is 25 ° ±. Verify that the appropriate angle of inclination is specified on the drawings. 4. Detail 3/SS3 indicates that the proposed retaining wall includes a shotcrete facing. Verify that this is intended. If a shotcrete facing is proposed, wall reinforcing should be specified and additional details should be provided. 5. Calculations qualifying the design of the timber lagging should be submitted for our review. Refer to the Materials section of the Notes on Sheet SS 1. The bottom of the timber lagging should also be shown on the drawings. Engineer, Plunnert Surveyor, Woshington Oregon Alaska Reid Middleton, Inc. 729134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 Ph: 425 741 -3900 Fax: 425 741-3900 1 Mr. Bob I3endicto City of Tukwila April 5, 2002 File No. 26 -02- 005- 004 -01 Page 2 6. A cut referencing Section 4 /SS2 is taken at bile 10 on Sheet SS 1. The referenced section is incorrect and should be revised for clarity. 7. A 50 ksi yield strength of structural steel is specified in the calculations and and shoring notes. Elevation A/SS2 notes that Piles 6 through 30 consist of 30 ksi steel piles. Please clarify. 8. The Tieback Schedule on Sheet SS2 omits the information for Pile 30. It appears the second row of the Schedule should reference Piles 6 thru 30 (instead of 6 thru 29). Corrections and comments made during the review process do not relieve the project applicant or designer from compliance with code requirements, conditions of approval, and permit requirements; nor is the designer relieved of responsibility for a complete design in accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. This plan review check is for general compliance with the Uniform Building Code as it relates to the project. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call. Sincerely, Reid Middleton, Inc. K'Ii K. Ya atsuka, P.E. Proj ct Man ger sJ s\26se\plunrevw \tukwila \02UOO4r 1.doc\fine cc: Robert Thompson, CT Engineering PLLC /FiD#e Florendo Cabudol, Jr. Design Engineer /9*.:("tae.4 Reid iddleton E N G I N E E R I N G NM Client: PLLC Revised Structural Calculations For HILLCREST APARTMENTS Tukwila, WA Helen Ing Investments c/o Lowell Ing 1522 Alen. Drive Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817 USA Contact Jeff Ing Tel (415) 902.4696 Rob Thompson Tel ; (206) 285.4512 Structural Engineers ,n„FaFlkMSt }k 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 285.4512(V) (206) 285.0618(1) rthompson @ctcnginccring.com 1 g L C T E N G I N E E 1 N G Project: ) 4t-te 0`43- 1+ L L 0 Date. n'(l2bt02 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (2061285.4512 FAX: Client: Page Number (2061 285-0618 L ,GINc, Ortiz. s: wS5" +*40p • 95.134 4o fifit I 415 x 4.C?'(' , = Ir 31 ' vs 4° 1 2 131 tr. ■ 54,514436.4. 1.444•01 14 • • 1131` • a l „4.yv 1/3 .4:4-r Structural Englnoors OM 40�' +10Xr3 L 2• te 1100 r 41 40' SC' G. <33 L 05/01/2082 11 :48 4257478561 GEOTECH _, PAGE 01 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Memo 13256 NE 20te Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 747 -5618 FAX 747-8561 Ta Rob Thompson um 98399 Company' CT Enginooring Ran Jan 3 Str FAX! (200) 298.0618 Oars May 1, 2002 Po mo (206) 285.4512 Mspo: 1 of 1 It/s 'rvpewi Minalund PM • Milldrad Aprimasts 'tea, tMseothwrion Rob- we have reviewed Item 2 from the comment letter prepared by Reid Middleton, Inc. and dated Apnl 8, 2002. According to the plans, there Is a depth of the fill to be placed on the western Ode of the proposed waN (between the apartment building and the proposed soldier pile retaining wall). This fill is necessary to restore lateral support to the apartment building where the soU has been removed by the landslide. The backflll has been incorporated into the design soil pressures on the well. In our opinion, placement of tho structural fill In this location Is acceptable, we trust this memo fulfills your needs at this time. Please call with questions, or if we can be of further assistance. SI rya James H. Strange, Jr., P.E. Project Manager CT t N () I N t t P N () TO: Reid Middleton Inc 728134 St SW, Ste 200 Everett, WA 98204 F : 425.741.3900 PLLC TRANSMIii'AL 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 285.4512(V) (206) 2$3-0618(P) nhotnpio r ng.com JOB: 98183 WE ARE SENDING YOU the following items: ❑ Shop Drawings ® Prints ❑ Original plans ® Copy of letter ® Geotcch Report/Reply ® Calculations, etc. COPIES DATE NO, t)P.scalI fON �r 2 04/26/02 3 SS 1 SS2 SS3 Rev 4 dd 04/26/02 • Shorin : dw 1 04/30/02 1 Revised Structural clues - In 4 _ In! calcs 1 — 05/01/02 1 Letter from Ocotech Consultants Inc. 1 05/01/02 1 Res .. nu letter to RMI comments THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as chocked below: For approval For your use As requested For review and comment REMARKS: Kyllc, Approval as submitted Approved as Mod Returned for eorroctlons ❑ Resubmit __ copies for approval Submit __ copies for distribution Return ,_ corrected prints For bid • Attached please found our response to your comments on the above project • Wo trust that this submittal satisfies your comments • Please call if you have any other questions... Regards, COPY TO Gerard Acukel SSW (dwgs) Joanna Spencer City (dwgs) Hillcrest Apts. Shoring 26 -02- 005 - 004 -02 D RED MDDLETON SIGNED: Rob Thompson Date : 404.4 of 121vot. H,'//es{ ,4,- 7C tfe. ilek-ttocrt>4 *4411404*, 285" ti's'/ 2. dt' eevat . urwr K 5•"Yt► * • lire !y•-T ?.c . p, o e'77( 7 --Se SS 1 600 W"' q0LtCk t4") 6Av I4GG ...T‘14? �G4• N G - 4 I O/) ( 4 L 4 Wet". cit90/014-• c e/"' 064.)eizi ;(4.44c (z» .Q/71 /J rD- Col 1 - .,�, I �. tool∎ hi 1.34,-7D C,z -o4, ZS% 44/zo 2215" OW) a /0 - Ze k za I '` )465eh - Sr. tc1"5 examen 4,0 /hav A per74 cam, 43(- 3670 • / -;-•• ji • ;:. • 7 / / • • • ■•••••••• 111111111 R3ov5004934 CITY OF TUKWILA ' . , DOCUMENT RECORDING • 02NIIVIEME Return Addresi / CITY OF TUKWILA City Clerk's Department " 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 4334800 Document Title(s) • • Bens:Awe Area Covenant andltold Harmless Agreement (Permst M102-030 War:rest Apts. Retaining Wall) 1511171•■■ Parties. Other. CimarambealLIMulungum 1711=1TREVAI1WILTLwsnr---- his placed the document of record 11 a customer courtesy and accepts no liability for the accuracy o vsidity ol the document C - (4.303 -000 /7. Lost Name First Name Helen Ing Investments) LLm&ted Partnershs Company Hama (1 business) • 200 tat Avenue W. 14501 Wish; Address Seattle, City WA Slaw Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s) Abrev. Legal; PortIon of Lot 2, vol. 10, page 55 359-700-0020-09 ClibPDF • www.fastio.com 98119 Zsp Mat- os WAN RECrO EDj RETURN TO City Clerk F 1 t City of Tukwila x f.. £ , 6200 Southcenter Boulevard., Tukwila, WA 98188 i 'efe%ence.Number(s) of 71:tetaiectDoCument(s): Grantor:Yf. Grantee: Legal Description (Abbreviated): Assessor's Tax Parcel ID Number: Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership The City,,of Tukwila Portion of Lot'2; Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to`the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King COurity,.Wiishitigton r,s Full Legal Description is Pound on Exhibit A of this document. 359.700.0020.09 I' 1 SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT This covenant and hold harmless agreement is entered into between Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington limited partnership ( "Grantor "), and the City of Tukwila, of a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantee ") RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor owns and has applied for necessary permits to construct a steep slope landslide stabilization wall on a section of the property (the "Property ") legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by reference SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT N440)1401 CIibPDF - www.fastio.com Page 1 of 7 ti a � .. W#ER AS,_a•portion of the Property on which the retaining wall is sited contains sensitive; are s. r pptenti'ai geologic instability (potential slide areas) as depicted, solely for infoimetiorial:purposes; in Exhibit,B, which is attached and incorporated by reference, WHEREAS,' as a condition =of the issuance of Miscellaneous Permit approval for °the construction of a retaining -wall and - associated drainage facilities on a limited portion of the Property, the Grantee;required.ihe ()renter to execute and record this "Sensitive Area ;Covenant and Hold Harmless Areement" to hold the City of Tukwila harmless from' all-loss incurred as a result of anyt landslide, sctsnuc activity, or soil disturbance ansing.out of the issuance of said permit. f #; • :WHEREAS, Grantor assumed this obligation in order to obtain said permit for the Properly . F iY WHEREAS, the,. parties 'agree- that this agreement constitutes an arms' length, bargained -for agreement, which includes a,waiver of liability that runs with the land for nsks created by the propoi3ed use of property because of the shape, composition, location or other characteristic unique to the Property sought to be developed NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows AGREEMENT 1, In consideration of Grantee issuing Miscellaneous Permit approval for the construction of a retaining wall and related drainage facilities on a limited portion of the Property, which constitutes good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which and the sufficiency of which the Grantor hereby acknowledges, the Grantor on its own behalf and on behalf of its heirs, successors, and assigns hereby waives any nght to assert any claim against the Grantee, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and assigns for any loss, or damage to people or property either on or off the site resulting from any landslide or seismic activity or soil disturbance on said Property by reason of or arising out of the issuance of the permits) by the City for development on said Property except only for such losses that may directly result from the sole negligence of the City, 2 Grantor will inform its successors and assigns of said Property that the Property is in an area of potential geologic instability (potential slide area), of the nsks associated with development thereon, of any conditions or prohibitions on development imposed by the City of Tukwila, and of any features in this design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soils changes SENSITIVE AREA COVENAN I' AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT 500314 0, CIibPDF - www.tastio.com Page 2 of 7 COrantor;will maintain continuous insurance coverage as required by the permftt atitho izf'ng thn "development : J d fY yr r:r .. Grantee' .inspectioneor acceptance of any of the Grantor's construction or other work efthir.during constructing or when completed shall not be grounds to avoid any of these covenants of indemrfifieation 1 l•- S, This covenant: and; holo lharmless'agreement shall be a covenant running /with the land and the nghts and dbligAtions'cc ntained herein shall run with and burden th'e Property, including each parcel comprising the Property and shall inure to the benefit of�>iintl be;binding upon the Grantor and Grantee, their successors and assigns DATEii ttfisr LA da of 200 3 GRANTOR, HELEN INC INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership By 1.1.1,0V{ Helen Heu Ing, its Goner ,1J Partner GRANTEE CITY OF TUKWILA By m Morro its Public Works Director SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT 50340314 CIihPDF • www.fhstio.com Page 3 of 7 •• ; 3 i 1 -........ .... / __I- ' --sTAtt OPIIAWII- ) , •y ' ~.. ''-/ ,/ ; ,/'i f-11[1 ...$ otr-vr.Y of riortn ts)L,u ) ... . . „ . . ... , On this day -6f 200 , before me, a Notary Public littand for the State of liaivaii,.ther4ersoriall /appeared Helen lieu Ing, to me known to be the General Partner -.61- lielenflaillivestMents Limited Partnership, a Washington / ;Wilted partnership that executed the fotegbitig-instrument, and acknowledged it to be the / / free,tind-voluntary act of said limitad"P`aripership, for the uses and purposes mentioned in -114(iistrument, and on oath stated that she Was authorized to execute said instrument IN,WITNESS.WHEREOP, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and )46 firstiaboviWntten • (seal) • 7"‘L..... , ; ,,, — , , (Some i ti .. .. .. .• r.....". *Ai 7 f SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND FIOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT 50340314 0? CIibPDF www.fastio.corn Mx" yrtet Slamp HMO of Noluy) piiblie,in and for the State of *WW1/ 5tr. • Mdesittagecnirresiding at 40/101edit,j/L, My appointment expires 41-- -0,90D,r Page 4 of 7 1 . ; / • " • • e " f .' /s , ./ i•-•-'> ,' . TAtE OFVASHINGTON 'UfsrrY017 to i' — --,,' , ..•.•/ !' On;ihis:c10,-Sefore-me personally appeared JIM MORROW who is to me known to be the PUBI..IC.WORKS .DIRECtoR for the City of Tukwila and who executed this instrument on behalf Of the city' OfTgkwila in hia capacity as PUBLIC WORKS 1 DIRECTOR and acknowledged thathelkiiiithorizdd to do so as the City's free and voluntary act and deed, farthe uses'aid'OrPolesiherein mentioned , , . - / ,.—.. • ',GIVEN under my hand and Official seal this 26A day of ebeu r 2003 , .. . ..../ .1 / ! ...4......00.,ku «...."*A0.0kIN ..., .?.. 0. a .. 4 ...... II. ,....t.•400N lit _.11‘_ ,:0 .., • ' 0 1 betgilANY l'• lil NOTARY PUBLIC in and the State of :u ''''- i'' ,i — .., Washington residing at Sermon ft, I., PUBUO , '.: - % e : ,- ! ' My commission expires: jvzily:0_4_ - i .. :,,,* .. • - .. r , 1 % % ‘ittwa vk , Zw• I AseS # .1. STATE OF WAVit i NOTON $ . . .., , COUNTY OF KINO ' . i ii Approved as to form Attorney or the City of Tukwtla sENsrrivE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT $0300314 ClibPDF www.fastio.com Page 5 of 7 r• "r r • , • EXHIBIT A ...ILEpAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY • •? LOT 2, INTERURBAN ADDITION-TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT /THEREOF RECORDED-IN VOLUME-1d OPPLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, .1.- EkCliPT. A STRIP ALONG THE EASTERLY SIDE THEREOF, CONDEMNED FOR KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO 109001; / . EXCliPtTIM•NORTII 250 FEET OF SAID LOT 2, AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST-LINE THEREOF, AND EXCEPT PpLLOWIi■IG DESCRIBED PORTION THEREOF BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149Th STREET AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY, MARGIN OF S.S.F1 NO 5-M, SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO,ANjo FEET.Fitam STATION 108+27 35 OF SAID HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 22°46'30" WEST ALONG SAD mokyliAY 365 31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°37'52" WEST 139 18 FEET, 11/4, THENCE SOUTH 22°46'30" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY, 243.91 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 86°39'00" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 149 STREET, 43.30 FEET, THENCE SOUTFI 03°21'00" WEST 100 26 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SAID STREET, THENCE SOUTH 86°39'00" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH MARGIN 148.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 65°41'00" EAST 0.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT m60'401 ClibPDF • www.fastio.com Page 6 of 7 . • , . • f . . • 4 1. 4' • :• , EXHIBIT B ,f --/J,PEPICTION OF SENSITIVE AREAS '-, • 1 i „ , I r, ./ . . 1 ...I , ,;■ .: ar .! .... . - : 1 . . • - 0 / ', • , 1 ,., ..' ,•! ..•••••' SENSITIVE AREA COVENANT AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT 30360)14 GI ClibPDF • www.fastio,com • .1; • Page 7 of 7 ok« Arc u ti 110711 Western toning line of nom along Interurban located 10 feet higher in elevation than tot of alope as it wets at hmo of adoption -_ • • ClibPOF • www.fastio.com 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 bent by: EDWARDS,BIEH,3MITMGOt. MEND • • 4 r 1. AErIMW ADDIWIat RGOBRT 0, oIEN . Edwards CM Smith a oeodfriond, P.S. 101 -'9111 Avinue, Suite 7110.. • Beadle, WA Ee1t44 «•inn► CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT CT ENGINEERING PAGE 03/12 206 624 O809; 04/01 /c ,'2:14PM;AMAL #457;Page 2/11 go" RETAINING WALL AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM .014INToM: tiD Rr"dRAldt'Ite: /f1A1. DI$CAIPTIONIE CD. ucr cv (7 011116111101111 PROP1 TY TM PARGEIJA000UNT NuMaIr a50400402a.04, 350.700.0021.04, r Iffir .46C59421- ' ' THIS IN 8 is midi by Seattle Tacoma Executive Properties Limited Partnership, a. M Llmitad Pertnershlp, and Stook Market Institute of Learning, Inc, 'f4Ws:Wads Cook B•miners, Inc We United Support Association, hereafter called the Grantor, and Helen Ing Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership, hereinafter Galled Grantee, ' YYl T E$s ' Seattle Tar.oma executive Properties Limited Partnership, aJiTiibifiiisr►Umlteq Partnership; Stook Market Institute of Lamming, Inc, We Wade Cook seminars, Inc. Ms United Support Association Helen In Investments Limited Partnership, a Washington Limited Partnership The North 250 ft. along the West Ilne of Lot 2, of Interurban sddltion to 6eattis, as par Plot martial In Volume 10 of Plats, Pogo 55, Records of King County. Portion of Lot 2, Interurban additlon to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 10 of Plats, Pape 55, records of King County, Washington. Portion of Lot 2, Interurban, addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded In Voiuma 10 of Plats, Pogo 15, records of King County, Washington, 940700.0020.02 MI 01 -o38 6012 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 04/12 Sent by: EDWAR0S,aIEH,8MIT48000 .TENO 208 824 0800; 04/01 /t 2:15PM;JutE9L,8457;Page 3/11 • • 1,. • : Oran! of►Eaaarnert. For'and•infcortsidaration of valuable benefits the receipt wllireot 1i hereby acknowledged, Grantor grants and convoys an exclusive easement for the purposes described in paragraph 3 across the property described In paragraph 2, . 2.. • i.aa ai Daagilpj , n o nt f aiin . The property subject to the easement Is !boated in King County, State of Washington. The property subject to the easement is composed of two parcels, legally described as follows; p adana: •That•partlori of Lot 2, Interurban addition to Seattle, According to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plate, Page 58, Records of King County, Washington, described as follows: . Beginning at the intersection of the Northerly margin of South 149th Street and the southwesterly margin of 6814 t •M, said point being at right angles to and .3O: feefrom •station 1 oe +27.36 of said highway; Things N 22`48'00" W 111,37 feet to the point of beginning; Thence continuing N 22046•00" W 263,04 feet; Thence g 89.38'22" W 130.18 feet; Thence 8 22.45'00" E parallel to said highway 243,51 feet; Thence S 88•3e'OO"•0 parallel to the North margin of South 140th Street 143.31 feet to the point of beginning. Situate In the County of King, state of Washington, The south seventy (70) feet of the reel property described as: This North 280 Feet,.as measured alcnp the West line of Lot 2, of interurban Addition to Seattle, as per Plat recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 55, re cords, of King County; Except that portion, described es follows; ;•Septnntna. it the Northvwot comer of said Lot; . • Thenai*South along the West line of said Lot 250,00 feet: Then North 00.37"52" Eat. 178.40 fort; Thertci Northwesterly to e point on the :North : Iine of sold lot which is North 8$•3712" East a.distanoe of 10.00 feet from the point of beginning; Thelxt•Bouth e9"37'52" West 10,00 feet to the point of beginning of. said exceptions,, 1g 04/01/2003 15:42 2062050619 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 05/12 ,81rtt by: E0WAR08,8IEH,SMITH60004 ,TEND 208 624 0809; 04/01 /0. 2:15PM;j.t #457;Page 4/11 :.And.except that portion of Lot 2. Of lntorurbian addition to Seattle, as per Plat • recorded' In Volume 10 of Plats, Pape tip, Records of King County, described as • :foliowb; • • winning es a polnt.on the North line of sold Lot 2, lying south 86637'52" MM. 146413. feet from the intersection of said North line with the Southwesterly margins of Interurban Avenue. South (the Southwesterly line of the Northeasterly -40 feet of .lot 2); • . Thence North 89°3712"-East, 69,66 feet to a point on a curve to the right with a 100,00 foot radius and initial radial bearing of south 22'13'28" East, Thence Southwesterly on said curve an arc of 1 22,08 feet and control angle of 43'42'40" to the North,llns of said Tot 2; Thence North 8a•37'52" East 89;88 feat to the point of beginning, as convoyed to the City of Tukwila by recording no, 9300081289; • Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. a;, aialiffiudillimeat This easement Is for construction and maintenance of a reining wail, roughly paralie!'to, and welt'cf the westerly property line of the. real properly ,described in paragraph ,2 above, and for oonstruction and. maintenance of a drainage, system auoclatod with the retaining wall Installetlon, together with associated drainage facilities such as *wales, Thar rrtaining wall is being constructed on the real property doacribod in Section 4 below, and the associated drainage system Is being constructed on Parcel Ono described In Section • 2 above. The rights granted: undear this easement include ingress, egress shit moss to the prbbppiirty described In Section 2 for the construction and maintenancd of the'retaininp wall and drainage.systerta; including, bit not limited to, the temporary placement of,such trucks; drilling machines, earth moving equipment, and any other equipment used for the construction and maintenance of the drainage system, and for related activities, including, but not limited to, temporary placement or storage of tolls and fill; materials used in construction and • maintenance, temporary ,buildings or • trailers, placement of fencing,. • and all 'Other acts reasonably necessary or advisable for the construction and maintenance of the retaining wall, 3._. . . Grantee agrees to complete, at its sole cost and expense, the work necessary to construct the retaining well, drainage system Ind related facilities .In a professional Bind workmanlike meaner as soon as reasonably practicable following execution of this.aesrrraent by Grantor, but In no event lake than October 31, 2003. Grantee also shall completes the work In accordance with all applicable building codes, laws, rules, and regulations, Grad shell obtain the permits and approvals necessary for such work, If any. Grantee shall keep the property free end clear of liens and other encumbrances arising from or relating to the construction, repair, restoration or maintenance within the easement sirens. If :Grantee hails to do so, or to otherwise meet its obligations hereunder, Grantor, may, but Is not obligated to, psi such cost$ and expenses arising from or relating to Grantee's breach, and r bill Grantee for Grantor's costs, If Grantor.ls not reimbursed within 30 days from the date of 3 a� �e th2 OR 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618. CT ENGINEERING PAGE 06/12 . Sant by: EDWARDS,SIEH,SMImH &ado( .END 206 824 0908 04/01 /0 2:15PM;J&„rt457;paga 5/11 billing ..for Its. costs, Grantor mey have afl�n for the unpaid costs pieced upon Grantee's . prupi ty_ • 4. • . pnoegty Smog The easement Is for the benefit of the real property ,described a$ .. $aa'attached Exhibit A. 8,. ifigigligjgajLeiggedyi Grantee shall not be required to perform any . restoration of Grantor's property following Initial construction of the retaining wall, drainage system and related facilities. Upon completion of construction, Grantee shall thereafter, following any maintenance of the retaining wall, drainage system end related facilities, restore the Premises described In Section 2 above to Its condition prior to the maintenance, i(). JIsaenvatlona by Grantor. Except as may ba required for the construction and maintenance of the retaining Wall, drainage system and related facilities described In Section 3 above, nothing in this easement gives to anyone the right to Interfere with the use by Grantor, Ka officers, •mpioyeea, sa.nts, Quests, or its successors or assigns of the easement in common with 'others as defined in this easement document, ,; i{b). Grantor may at Its sole expense, re-route the drainage system when and if it ctwoeae to install Its own drainage system which would be adequate to provide the same. drainage as the drainage • system to be installed and maintained by Grantee. Upon installation of any drainage : systsirn by Grantor which replaces or reroutes the drainage syptem installed by Granter, Grantee ahal$ have no further liability of any kind to Grantor, arising out of the drainage system installed by Grantee. . . 7. ilpW Harmleu. Grantee shall pay, defend, Indemnify and hold Grantor, . its Oars, employees, agents, guests, customers, and grantors successors • and assigns harmless from any liability .for injury to persona or damage to property arising out of the construction or. maintenance of the�retsining wall, which is on the real property described In Section .4 and ; which roughly parallels the north•south common boundary b.tw.in the real •pinpsnipe described in poregrephs 2 and 4, or out of the construction end maintenance Mho • drainage system andr fat d'facilitiee, except for liability caused by the negligence or greater fault of Grantor or Grantors agents, representatives, contractors, Quests or others on Grantor% property through Grantor, . limgauggaisdAubs, The terms of this easement orator the benefit of, and shill alw.bInd, the heirs, sucastore and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. • !, gotaankLagatiluadthaajaal The covenants contained in this easement run. with the land described in thle easement and ere forth* benefit of the present, . owners of the described lend and.thalr grartleas, heirs, assigns and successors. 4 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 07/12 • Sent by: ECWAA08,8IEH,8MITHAGOC VEND 208 824 0809; 04/01/0 2:15PM; .r #457;Page 8/11 .. • 4 . 10. . ligamakeigi. In the event of a dispute over the terms of this easement, or to enforce' the': terms of. this easement& the prevailing party shall be paid such party* attorney's fees and costa, including, without limitation, reimbursement of any expert witness fees, and:thi •costs of mediation, arbitration, trial or appeal. t1. say ,gt This easement contains the entire agreement between the parties rolatlnp to the subject matter hereof and no modification of this agreement shall be valid unless made In writing and signed by the parties, - 12 /gam Notices given hereunder shell be given by 0) personal delivery; (I1) overnight courier, (Hi) teiecopy or fax followed by first class mail; or. (iv) certified map, return receipt requested, to the addresses under each party's signatuns below. A party may flange its address by written notice to the other party. Notices shall be deemed to be received and :effective (I) when personally delivered; (11) one day after tfw date of forwarding by overnight • _courier; (M) on the date of teleoopy or facsimile with confirmatlon if the date of receipt is not a weekend or holiday, or if • weekend or holiday, then on the next business day; or (Iv) if sent via certified mall, on the date of receipt, , �— dt NTbE NELIIlN'" . INS `INVIESTMRNTa LIMITED $RATTLE TACOMA I*ICUTIVR PROPERTIES PMTt $ MHIPI A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIMMCITTNERSHIP, PARTNERSHIP A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP gct- C44 r He en g,: Omani Partner GUNTOR v. Authorized Representative STOCK MARRO INSTITUT' OP LeARNINa, INc. M /K/A WADI COOK SIMINAA$, INC. P/K/A UNITED SUPPORT ASSOCIATION ' ore Authorised Representative 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 08/12 a.nt by EOW00e,BIEH,BMITN6000; :ENO 208 824 0809; 04/01 /0!1 :38PMLMgTM {1465 ;Page 2/2 /0• Aam r ame. In the event of a dispute over the terms eats easement, or to enforce the terns of this easement, the prevailing party shell be paid such party's attorneys fees and costs, including, without limitation, reimbursement of fifty expert witness feel, and the costa of mediation, arbitration, trial or Appeal. !t, This .cement contains the entire agreement between the perti.e relating to a stmt matter hereof end no modification of this easement shalt be • valid unless made in writing end signed by the parties, 1t• Maki& Notices given hereunder shall be given by 0) personal delivery; (ii) overnight courier, ail) tN.coppyy or flax ft /110% rd by first class melt; ar (Iv) oeilified mall, return I.gti*ited, to tho s kkossas under each p.rtyi signature below, A pony may change • its sea by widen notice to the other petty, Notices shell be beamed to be received and N'hdive (1) when peraolielly adored; (li) one day after the data of forwfvdinn by overnight aoud.i; OD) an the date of telectpy or facsimile with confirmation Nth* date of receipt is not r wsaltemtd or holiday, at if a wa kand or holiday, than an the nerd business dog; ar (iv) if sent . via witted mail, on Ilia data at except. CA awes 3*A$To* c: HIM born Hewes is LAWN Semi TACOM* latecuTlvll PfloPIAT10 PANMap$INM, A MINNOW* Lump Um= PanT eallar, P'ARTmissHI' A WAOHINGIToN WORD PAATNIUMIP Cs` C Melon • , . often C\1 c� Authorized Repr santatly. OTOaK MARKRT INOT'INTX OF IJAAMNO, INC. F/KIA WAOtt COOK $RMINAA:, INC. Paws UtanW $uPP0NT AesoCNTIoN iiiww.�► . -••��► r Am sad Representative . 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 09/12 Bint'ny: EOWARDS,8IEH,8MITHi00o' IEN° 20e 824 0809; 04/01 /0- '2:18PM;»ffgj 1045T;pago 8/11 • • • • . 'STAIR Of..MNWAII 01140 o' 4.04a1.14 • on , my M , zoo2, Worn m., me unionism, 8 Nos/ Put* In ond far the vow of , fowl& duff► •ammMMMInotand onion* H*low IN to blown to 4s, ot.h at,i oo rlr ordoNAMt tion /DWI, MuMOM hobo of�'M on 1m rrlArta L�fllllrf4 %==. o ,;1M1'Ailoylod tie body inoM. Mrlt M Wired Pow 01 FIRMA Ow� InVMIfIonio Lo • Wilhlesten Welled Peonesehlp, and oolomoNs /wl.Mw sold hnelmnor4 a be the free sn4 vdwilrry aKAM1 4. . • G. arpararon oft moll oenornl.Paf1NN. And of old Umitod PMrlafihlp, for Ma one and ppy ',moors, �Mafillanodeond qn Gib stout Mid its in einharlsed 'i<I•e0�ci 1h. WO Oakmont en4 tMtlhe Mal i1Aer4 le �eol Meld ealpereree dMMN ftittner. _ `' • ad Ono 41014' - 1 Mom NM the nav inn year In le arifigate shave *Moan, s �T'• C ,,NTY- or 4 l 0 ;0 : 7 OA ore an M 2003, Wore me, the undetelont+4;I Notary P*0In andl4r +'.. ': the; '. `i1Mi of , > iMd mom 14,00110 : • 'opprsfrd boleti Ills • ,,t' ' 1 , rrAoMr _ M lea, erh fihAWA 041•11 ofpOiIII,NIo C *NM *WNW itan p, a WSW 'aftihkMH/ ( i . AA 'WNW Onbombe pm olNtotla rtiewouio the Inetn�unent, en4Os g oilOi Mmbroarew M c ". its mod viliaso 3 dio/ 1 PJ , owl p 1p_ *Nolo mr114ii. s , , ` ' ': ■MlNVIi my how and 0,810 eats hereto aid ore dory and rear In M1M eertibaM above iwil .: . , • .. • • IwT *NOT PUNA in er,d foci* fhi of • my appolarns10 WWI' CZ, • o • • PPOnVrype Nome NOT PWUc In end Igor the Mate of kti .ot • 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 10/12 . gent by: EOWARDa,8IEH,8UITH &GOO LEND 208 824 0809; 04/01 /0 2:18P01WiLL 0457;page 9/11 • $ ATI OF HAWAII ) • COUNTY OP HONOLULU) • this ,..... day of , 2002, before me, the undsrelaned, u Notary Public In and for the Mete of • Heal, dulk eommaaabned andiwom, peraonslly apppered Helen Ina to me known to be, or heNnp shown rstf$tiole y.Mdenee of being, the Oenerel Pastriar of Helen Ino investments Limited Partnership; the corporiton that eateouted the forgoing Instrument as General Partner of Nolen Ins Invedmente limited. Perthetshfp, WeshMOmn UmNad Partnemhlp,.and uhnowledgid the said Instrument to b• thanes and volunbrryaotond cued of said ootporatlon ue fruit general Partner, and of wad Umtted Partnership, for the uses and purposes therein margined, end on oath stead that eh* was authorised to execute the said instrument and that the *oat affixed is the aerpprN* sail o! said earpenttlon *Natal Partner. WITNpd my hand and offldal seal hereto adbcod the day and yar in this oerlNioate above **an. rowswassorsiNialle .11.._..._11. PrintRype Name NOTARY POLIO In end for the State of Newell, residing at My appointment expires e-- STATE. OI', WA$HINOTON + ON CONNIY OP KIN O CD ' .0n Itds XIL144 dray of ,1111.., 2003, before me, the underalaned, a Notary PubIlo In and for agfnmlestoned , and wore • r.onelly appeared before me Q MI s n' to nu Known to boa or hot • ; , , , sa$effsotory wkience *NINON ''t'�i"' • : • T000nna N pontes Limited Partnership, Umlled Pad nenNP, Ind hM O N =` 'Waft OM that hbhhpwas aw1lor*id to arreowM the Indtnament,. end Nwho «raansdIN foregoing inslr<unentss CA Whit hw and VolunNaty eat and deed far thta was • , des Vim in menbonaO, n • t:11 , ' WITNtMM my hand end IOUs, seal her • a day and this a Aosta above w wren. C:>••,,.. =4:,, A. I.:..46 ! ..... # 1 i . /. _j :'.e. .1M:1! Ai. y • ,. o. pan are NOT PUM Uo In and the t f Washington, nodding at uG •, My appointment acapiise "'WO 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE:. 11/12 Sent by: EOWARDS1SIEH,BMITH6000 SEND 209 824 0809; 04/01/0' ?:16PNI;altfiz,8457 :Pepe 10/11 • STATE OF WASHINGTONV )es. .COUNTY OF K I N. o On thIi of 2002, 'Wore no tho undf n d, o ry Public, in and for th• its 6f • - Wssltin�n,: oortlEntsro Ind Iwom personalty Merkel tome *own WI , of having shown seltsladory.videncsof being, the of Stook Merkel Inagtule of :UMW, Inc, Mc/s Wale Cook Eeminurs, Inc, f/k/I Untied support Association, the corporation that executed the foregoing Instrument, and nailing on eat stated that haMhsrthoy wssMmrrr'authorized to snouts the Instrument, aoknowladQad 510 said instrument to be the Ss Ind voluntary sot and dead of said corporation, for th• uses and purposes therein mentioned, ' WITNESS my had and oftbobil seal bonito the dray and year In tills csrttfldste apova written. ti� ..;';'••4 Nay - •iit ai s; •I s 4•' 4"et ‘$.4314a1 . ,.".,;;;„ v./ tugito.00: PAnrype Name NOTARY PUSLIO In end r 1ha Washington, rsabdin0 at '' My eppoinlment some e 04/01/2003 15:42 2062850618 CT ENGINEERING PAGE 12 /12 Sent by: EOWAAO818IEH,SMITH &000 £ENO 208 824 0809; 04/01 /0 2:17PM;J1 j& j4571 pegs 11/11 14. • , , • • • , r EXHIBIT A Lot 2, Interurban addition to S..ttla, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Papa 551 In King County, Washington; •. Except a strip along the Easterly side thereof, condemned for road in King ' County Superior Court Cauca No 109001; Except the North 250 feet of said Lot 2, as measured atonic the West Ilna thereof; And wept the following described portion thereof: "ginning at the intersection of the Nonh margin of South 149th Street and .. ,the Southwisterly margin of 8,S,M;. Not 5•M, said point being et right angles , to and 30 feet from station 108 +27,35 of said highway; Thence: N 22.48'00" W along said highway 365,31 foot; 'Menu 9 80'38'2" W 13,18 feat; . ThencS g 22'48'00' E, parallel with said highway, 243,91 feat; Thanes S 58•91100" E, parallel with Ma North margin of South 149th Strew, 43.30 feet; thence 8'03.21'00" W 100.28 feat to the North margin of said street; Thane $ 05639100" E slang said North margin 148.51 feet; Thence N 05•41'00" E 0,60 feet to the point of beginning. kilk,e,s/ 4074 4,42,1 e'rd627- Lib 'Llitv-arsioaq cat-- w■Lct,tkiew-tidc, Fewit R/r) Dave. Vl,14.,`s�e� 1��� &,401,:d46 /JOrt enter104-' 441 D d 1A -lam4) ""&oir? 15oweviera —17t 1,1a4 tom GVANA ,floc. A ItaA./ A14044 azo-A/ , /Aye, 014114, 44,1 oF� — P \!O IUNv CL4' Gar' 7-(440:62- - to t�l.Q 4/3/03 it 4,2g e L4.t Qi ore 'Z.€3r5 LOS x`35 61o1-(c( 2,4,c, 23 6r&1 0106 Al 33- 7i' %Mo. zoco zs Lt -7zt• ZZS ioG - Zded 2.d 6+' o(_- 451-3010 zC 43?-017q trzta 43S -x179 Print Map Page kg County F1(1ntr Nrws Syr V 1( P . Parcel Number Address Zlpcode Taxpayer HILLCREST ASSOCIATES 3597000020 14903 INTERURBAN AV S TM Information Included on this mop has boon compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to thong° without notice. King County makes no roprosontations or warranties, express or Impaled, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information, King County shall not be liable for wig general, special, Indirect, Inddontal, or consequential damages Including, but not limited to lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the usa or misuso of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or Information on this mop Is prohibitod except by written permission ing of KCounty (-.Omnl,'nts King Qaun1y. 1 G1S Center j News 1 Services 1 Comments. ( Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the silo, TtF�d °labs, Spa r( h Page 1 of 1 } ,..King County Dept. of Finance, Trr ury Operations - Property Tax Informs,,;; qn Page 1 of 2 King County P1E)mP News SE'r vic E'S Comment ',ear( h 1 trt.trt( t..i,id Ilrr'iri ss I), isit ) Property Tax information Sy.ster r Tax Account Number 359700002009 (This account is active.) Tax Payer Name HILLCREST ASSOCIATES 251752 Annual Statement Requested by Parcel Number 3597000020 Mailing Address C/O GRAN INC 1021 1ST AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119 Amount Due: $ 12,411.22 First half amount if paid by April 30, 2003. It is not necessary to have a tax statement to make your payment. Please write the account number on your check and make it payable to and mall it to: King County Treasury 500 4th Ave, #600 Seattle, WA 98104 If the mailing name or address Is incorrect and you want to make a change, please click on the following link: Tax Info FAQ If you would like an official printed tax statement mailed to the mailing address llsted.above, click on the REQUEST PRINTED TAX STATEMENT button. 2003 Tax Information Tax Amount: $ 24 815.76 Other Information Land Value: $ 34 6,700 FEES Land Value Improvement Value: NOXIOUS WEED $ 1,68 '__ Improvement Value: Status: Lev Code: $ 1,553,100 Taxable 2380 CONSERVATION $ 5.00 Total Billed: $ 24,822.44 Paid: $ 0.00 Interest: $ 0.00 Penal : $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 12,411,22 2002 Tax Information Tax Amount: $ 12,727.09 Other Information FEES $ 1,68 Land Value Improvement Value: $ 346,800 $ 600,100 NOXIOUS WEED 11 ng County Dept. of Finance, Trr - sury Operations - Property Tax Informat4In Page 2 of 2 Total Billed: Paid: Interest: $ 12,728.77 $ 12,728.77 $ 0.00 Penalty $ 0.00 Amount Due: 2001 Tax information $ 0.00 Status: Taxabl Levy Code: 2380 Tax Amount : $ 13,559.82 Other Information FEES Land Value $ 346,800 NOXIOUS WEED $ 1.03 Improvement Value: $ 600,100 _, Total Billed: $13,560.85 $ 13 560.85 Status: Levy Code: Taxable 2380, INIIIIIIIINIIIMIIV _ Paid: Interest+ $ 0.00 Penalty: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 0.00 2000 Tax Information Tax Amount : $14,251.21 Other Information FEES Land Value $ 346,800 $ 600,100 NOXIOUS WEED $ 1.03 Improvement Value: Total Billed: $14,252.24 Status: Taxable Paid: $ 14 252.24 Levy Code: 2380 Interest: $ 0,00 Penalty: $ 0.00 _Amount Due: $ 0.00 Rocoipt information Date: 10/11/02 Date: 04/26/02 Date: 11/01/01 Date: 10/27/00 Date: 05/03/00 Recelpt#: 450126 Recelpt#: 495569 Receipt#: 143605 Recelpt#: 094889 Recelpt#: 166037 Amount: $ 6,364.38 Amount: $ 6,364.39 Amount: $14,781,33 Amount: $ 7,126.12 Amount: $ 7,126.12 Treasury .Operations_Tax inf_ormatton_Home King„ County News 1 Services 1 Comments! Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site, TNA WIN MsgCode ;04 ParcelNumber350700002009 AppNumOtQueries :t ,/2002 14 :12 2062850r—' CT ENGINEERING ..-•., PAGE 02/02 oCT -21 -02 MON 12254 PM MWTN VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH 425 GOO 69SO P.01 g B. Esvelt, landscape architect 1884$ 922134, Ragan, WA 9805 425.432,1587 October 21, 2000 Mr. Rob Thompson CT Engineering 180 Nickerson St. Seattle, WA 98109 Re: Landscaping for Hillarest Apartments, Tukwila, WA Dear Rob, There has been soma question as to the advisability of Installing the plant materials In the drain Swale at the bottom of the retaining wall as shown per landscape plant. The plants that I selected for that area tend to be sdaptabte to wet soil end should perform sufMcleatlywell ad as to setae both ground oosereand:to soften Thaeppseraiuo of the retainingensli;which, I was told at the beginning of.thsr project, was an.important.deslpn mown: Mything else planted in tha arc * wen cover ipwfltva Isyor of cdis) would,soon be overrun with weeds and would not provide the screening desired. It you 9a►ve.anyitlurther:Ruestions, VW** can 'me. March 27, 2002 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Dave Swanson, P.B. Reid Middleton 728 - 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 RE: Structural Review Hillcrest Apartments Shoring (M102 -038) Dear Mr, Swanson; Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Please review the enclosed plans and documents for structural compliance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code, If you should have any questions, please feel limo to contact me at (206) 431 -3684, Sincerely, Kett Ct .C9!1i Kathryn A, Stetson Permit Technician encl xo: Parmit Pilo No. MI02.038 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206.431.3670 • Fax: 206.431.3665 mai F. N (, 1 N F E P N (; Client: PLLC Structural and Civil Submittal For HILLCREST APARTMENTS 14903 Interurban Ave South Tukwila, WA Nolen Ing Investments c/o Lowell Ing 1522 Alowa Drive Honolulu, Hamill, 96817 USA Contact Jeff Ing Tel (415) 9024696 Rob Thompson Tel : (206) 285.4512 Structural Engineers 180 Nickerson St. Suite 302 Seattle, WA 98109 (206)285.4512(V) (206)285.06180 rthompsongctenginccring.com OITg KWILA MAR 2 1 2002 PERMIT CENTER M(003t Application Forms Miscellaneous Permit Application Submittal Index (1) copy with fees (S 1,555.94) Civil and Structural drawings Drawgins (5) copies Copies of Reports Calculations (3) copies Soils Report (5) copies Structural Engineers CITn9E.P iKVVILA MAR 2 1 2002 PERMIT CENTER IOD.-b3$ a.k.1 PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: MI02 -038 PROJECT NAME: HiUICrest Apartments Shoring SITE ADDRESS: _ .14.903 Interurban Av 5 DATE: 10 -01 -02 Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # __*i__Response to Correction Letter # _„revision it After Permit Is Issued DEPA THE mix/ 82, Ruiidinivi'sion 0 P tbiic W 6Id n(�. (4t . Z Fire Prevention • Structural DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (rues., Thurs.) Complete U Connments: Incomplete ❑ ❑ Planning Division Permit Coordinator filt DUE DATE :_l 04)3 7.802_ Not Applicable ❑ Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED :, Departments determined Incomplete: bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Stet( Initials: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route Structural Review Required ❑ No further Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: ❑ DATE: ��PROVALS OR CORK CTj NSOK CORR(CTI4NS: Approved with Conditions Approved ❑ Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DUE DATE: 10 -314 Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire 0 Ping ❑ PW 0 Staff Initials: Documenls/iouiins slip.doc 2.28.02 .014,4‘ PLAAdOO I aEW /��U ,TI�RT� SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M102 -038 DATE: 03 -21 -02 PROJECT NAME: Hillcrest Apartments Shoring SITE ADDRESS: 14903. Interurban Av S Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # ._„_,Response to Correction Letter #_ __Revision # After Permit Is Issued P: R TS: Bui cling •ivision Public Works e'55 n1o., Fire .0'on Structural DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Er Comments: Incomplete ❑ Planning n � ning ivisiop Permit Coordinator g DUE DATE: 03-2.6 -U2 Not Applicable ❑ Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED :_ LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED :, Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire 0 Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials:� TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Structural Review Required V No further Review Required Rc q DATE: O O O IO S: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DUE DATE: - -,Q2,... Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: 7' 1'I'' O) Departments issued corrections: Bldg 56 Fire ❑ Ping PW X Staff Initials: OocumenWS ;outing siip.doc 2.28-02 PERMIT COORD COPY • • 11 igt,1,1 1• L ,a ,It •011,clh.l6f i.- I+p 4 • 1 f823 tk MI (AM) DEPARTMENT OP LABOR AND INDUSTRIES REGISTERED AS PROVIDED BY LAX AS Lt4)Ot87'i,'�i.' DATE GRAN INC 1021 ' 1ST AVE W , SEATTLE WA 99119 WA And Mph). p)ry Cotner!, --- -% REGISTERED A8 PROVIDED BY LAW AS CONST CONT :GENERAL . REGIST. 11 EXO, DATE' cco1 GRANI*997NF 00/06/2004 EFFECTYVE DATE • 08/06/2001 GRAN INC' 1021 1ST AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119 - Signature Issued by DEPARTMENT OP LABOR AND INDUSTRIES F1».J1. %Z.pN) IN97) Please Remove And Sign Idenlificntion Card Before Placing In Billfold File: MI02 -0038 35mm Drawing #1-2.. 1 • I I 0 Inch 1/16 6 st Ft Li 61 i , '0(. ----E. T S j% L L l 0 1 IIIIIlIIIIIIIII1111 11 111111 1111J11 •IIII�IIIII_IIII�IIlul11111111 1111 1111 -1 1 11 1 111IIII IIIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIImiI I / / | i . / ! 1 ! / ' | | i | | | / . | ! i . • I � | / | / • . � ' � | ! | I � / / ' ' i . I i . \ \ / / / / / II / / / / I/ / / / , | ! | / / ' / i | | / r`� / k k / / / y . ; I | | � ' ! . i /� | /' y y /, | /| | | / . , i / ' 1 / | „ci....._ 1 | i 1 � 1 ' i . i ; | I | i i 1 , | 1 � | / ' --_� . ' mi z 1 • I ' • m| V w/ * | 1 ! ^ ^ n 1 n w w x ' / ' ' w | / x w x i 1 / 1 1 | 1/16 /'' ' ' ` ' / ; ' | / . / ! '| ' ! ' ' ' | ' ' . | 2 3 1 Inch . 1 L 1 R ~^,---' _�� . � �[ �i �--- �i �' - -51-- ---�---' - -'F-- � - - D -- ~ -�~- --- ^ v^ . u ' ~ , L � [ 0 |1|11|1|||■|||||||||||||||1|1||||||1||11|11|1|1|/||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||J|||||||hi|||||||||1||!1|1|11|1|!|���|1U1|11||| ' 1 � / / , / / v / / / I w n x w | x. 0 Inch 1/16 1 /'' / / ' |` / ' / • ' • ' | ' ' ' ' ! '| ' |<`' ' / ' | ' ' � ' 2� '. . ' 1 .. • 5 g[ ,~.[ E-L" 2� ~^ , � * � . -- 0 |iiii||||i|i||||||||||1||||1|1||||||||11[ 111|i|/|/||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||| ||||||||| |||J|||| |||||1||| ||||||||| 11!1|1|/| ||1|U11 |11/|��|||