Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit MI98-0099 - BERGSTROM SUBDIVISION - UTILITY WORK
S ' PI e t MI'48- OD ?9 1 City t y f r o f Tukwila (206) 431 -3670 Community Development / Public Works • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT WARNING: IF CONSTRUCTION BEGINS BEFORE APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRES, APPLICANT IS PROCEEDING AT THEIR OWN RISK. Parcel No: 115720 -0190 Address: 14921 57 AV S Suite No: Location: Category: UTIL Type: MISCPERM Zoning: LDR Const Type: Gas /Elec.: Units: 000 Setbacks: North: Water: TUKWILA Wetlands: Permit No: Status: Issued: Expires: MI98 -0099 ISSUED 10/02/1998 03/31/1999 Occupancy: UBC: Fire Protection: N/A .0 South: .0 East: .0 West: .0 Sewer: TUKWILA Slopes: Y Streams: Contractor License No: EASTLUI178CM OCCUPANT OWNER CONTACT PROJECT PLANNER ENGINEER CONTRACTOR BERGSTROM PLAT 14921 - 57 AV S, TUKWILA WA 98188 BERGSTROM MARY J 14921 57TH AVE S, TUKWILA WA 98168 MIKE DAVIS Phone: 253- 874 -0694 900 MERIDIAN AVE E #19 -313, MILTON WA 98354 BERGSTROM SUBDIVISION 14921 57 AV S, TUKWILA WA MOIRA BRADSHAW Phone: 206 431 -3670 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD, TUKWILA WA 98168 TOUMA ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 6632 S 191 PLACE #E -102, KENT, WA 98032 EASTLAKE UTILITIES INC 20117 142 AV NE, WOODINVILLE WA 98072 ********************* ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** ** * * * ** * ** * * * * ** *sir * ** ** *fir * * * * **** Permit Description: REQUIRED UTILITY WORK FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL PUBLIC WORKS CHANNELIZATION /STRIPING, CCAS, FIRE LOOP HYDRANT, LAND ALTERING, STORM DRAINAGE, PUBLIC SEWER & WATER MAIN EXTENSIONS, WATER SERVI- SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL LOTS (WATER METER PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED WITH INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMEMENT PERMITS FOR FUTURE HOMES) AND STREET LIGHTING. ***************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** Construction Valuation: $ .00 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: *(Water Meter Permits Listed Separate) Eng. Appr: JJS Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk /CSS: Y Fire Loop Hydrant: Y No: Size(in): .00 Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: End Time: Land Altering: Y Cut: 1948 Fill: Landscape Irrigation: N Moving Oversized Load: N Start Time: End Time: Sanitary Side Sewer: N No: Sewer Main Extension: Y Private: N Public: Y Storm Drainage: Y Street Use: N Water Main Extension: Y Private: N Public: Y ***************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * ** TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES: $ 281.00 *********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * *, *********** * * * * ** * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** Phone: (425)251 -0665 Phone: 425 - 868 -7836 50 Permit Center Authorized Signature: Date:/ -t I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I an uthorized to sign for and obtain this development perms Signature:___ Print Name: Date:,�� 2-90 Date application expires: / Z- Y"- CITY OF 'KWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Miscellaneous Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mall or facsimile. Project Name/Tenant: 7ekcy,5 m phgi Description of work to be done: fi// atquilted IdeeX -/i#-.R- FmAti #1S-4i1p L's "�❑ Value of Construction: L7, Q - Tax Parcel Number: l/ S7zo - 4/90 --o r Site Address: l yi7 / - 5'7 City tale /Zip: rt�.�_ Property Owner: mike, ge,c,,,4ton I Phone: z5-��- s%3 -77a 8 Phone: ZOG'' Zea' --6191/ 4/ Street Address: 80A 1g6 /i - k gP104 State/Zip: i Fax #: �� ` 1� Bt/ Contact Person: /VI �`6 -,0,906 '04504,,, 6�vp C Phone:2s 3 -87Y DC 1/'v' Fax #: Z93—€37,1- 5z 1// Street Address: City State /Zip: '`100 ' . 4.L vE- l a t th l i c i i 9 6 ' g 5 - ' 1 Contractor: r .'� _ ‘04/ /$/ Cit Sta a /Zip: - -- = - Phone: Street Address: 1 — 1 419 /00- I 0 ,. AU a I I i:.., , - -==`_ •••• Fax #: " -78 2�` Architect: 607Z Phone: / Street Address: City State /Zip Fax #: Engineer: To Ui tx 6 a2Zg � Phone: "[ z -- 25-2.- O s;� "[ Street Address: X632. beii /67/47--P 4 /OZ City State /Zip: kxrfr 7R03z Fax #: 112'-2 §-f ~D6z5- MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUESTED: (TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT) Description of work to be done: fi// atquilted IdeeX -/i#-.R- FmAti #1S-4i1p L's "�❑ Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? yes M no Attach list of materials and storage location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 paper indicating quantities & Material Safety Data Sheets • Above Ground Tanks ❑ Antennas /Satellite Dishes TD Bulkhead /Docks ❑ Commercial Reroof rn Demolition ❑ Fence ❑ Mechanical ❑ Manufactured Housing - Replacement only ❑ Parking Lots ❑ Retaining Walls Cl Temporary Pedestrian Protection /Exit Systems ❑ Temporary Facilities ❑ Tree Cutting APPLICANT: REQUEST. FOR MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS ❑ Channelization /Striping m Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: Size(s): ❑ Flood Control Zone Land Altering: Cutl000cubic yards 0 Fill cubic yards t /' /i' sq. ft.grading /clearing In Landscape Irrigation Sanitary Side Sewer #: � in Sewer Main Extension 0 Private ,$) Public Storm Drainage n Street Use al Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public ❑ Water Meter /Exempt # Size(s): 0 Deduct 0 Water Only ❑ Water Meter /Permanent # Size(s): ❑ Water Meter Temp # Size(s : Est. quantity' gal Schedule: ❑ Miscellaneous ILI Moving Oversized Load/Hauling MONTHLY SERVICE BILLINGS TO: Name: 5gat. 643 I Phone: z5-��- s%3 -77a 8 Address: box q ! I City /State /Zip: S11/e. 9e3 390 po Water 0 Sewer Metro ka Standby WATER METER DEPOSIT /REFUND BILLING: Name: V IPhone: Address: City /State /Zip: Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is Issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. Dale application accepted: T MISCPMT.DOC 7/11/96 Application taken b : (initials) ALL MISCELLANEOUS PI r, . IT APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUB ED WITH THE FOLLOWING: `➢ ALL:DRA WINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN ➢ BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED ➢ ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT ➢ STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ➢ CIVIUSITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER (P.E.)- EI SUBMIT APPLICATION AND REQUIRED CHECKLISTS FOR PERMIT REVIEW Submit checklist ;No: M -9 Above Ground Tanks/Water Tanks - Supported directly upon grade exceeding 5,000 gallons and a ratio of height to diameter or width which exceeds 2:1 0 Antennas /Satellite Dishes Submit checklist No: M -1 El Awnings /Canopies - No signage Commercial Tenant Improvement Permit ci Bulkhead /Dock Submit checklist No: M -10 Q Commercial Reroof Submit checklist No: M -6 Pho4 ey `.0 Demolition . - Submit checklist '. No:. M -3, M -3a 0 Fences - Over 6 feet in Height Submit checklist No: M -9 ri Land Altering/Grading/Preloads Submit checklist No: M -2 El Loading Docks Commercial Tenant Improvement Permit. Submit checklist No: H -17 0 Mechanical (Residential & Commercial) Submit checklist No.: M -8, Residential only - H -6; H -16 Miscellaneous Public Works Permits. Submit checklist . No: H -9 El Manufactured Housing (RED INSIGNIA ONLY) Submit checklist No: M -5 Moving Oversized Load /Hauling Submit checklist No: M -5 El Parking Lots Submit checklist No: M -4 ri Residential Reroof - Exempt with following exception: If roof structure to be repaired or replaced Residential Building Permit Submit checklist No: M -6 J Retaining Walls - Over 4 feet in height Submit checklist No: M -1 El Temporary Facilities Submit checklist No: M -7 Temporary Pedestrian Protection/Exit Systems Submit checklist No:. M -4 Tree Cutting Submit checklist No: M -2 Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". Building Owner /Authorized Agent If the applicant is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer,dr, contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING OWNE - O: A - OR ED AGE 4,,: Signature: dr /yam Date: 6, iy_ci g Print name; C, i . re - ,i . Pho4 ey `.0 Farb -2: , - :2 t/ Address: R6/ ii City /State /Zip: 46t 442- 98/0/-64/4/ AcifIresliii 14921 52 (V '13 13u:'i 1 ;e r. '11,A11t 1'a De _ M� C!'p ERM. P r'f.e.i it r 115220 -0.190 C1•TV OF TUIWILfl. Perm i t4I913• -00; 9 13ta1., ISSUED Finp'1 'i F!tl z 06i:011/3.938 Is ued.r. 10 02/i,9) 3 -. , t* of• k *AAh•k.Ak*** *•*.h•*l *fiis•A.A•k* • k• k**?**• k.• k* it. it* A;}• k*'*•** **.A• k*A %•kA *tt *•A• *. **:AA•*.A. *kkk ** Perm 1t Conti i t 1 0ns 1 . 14ODI1 Y TRACT C PE1:' I?L7W £I•IIiE'f COMMENTS. . TRAc.T C WIDTH VAR TIES FROM 20 '.TD 28 FIc:•T, PflV EII LNT,YI.T..U,LH,..4Jt'ift]:ES FROM ..17' -. .281 HE C2,fr. P11 WIDTH :(, 1.k ` �. I!! ,2() 'Tl:+ t+4 '�2" :VY* SHT 1lI CtP1R ~AST I3F iV' '1 Df'D (IN.,TIIE LAST :,]U � . 1.Ft11p l i . �1, ., :. .NESI SIDLa. C012Rs+ ,f }I41~L'1 :? a(�Ir`I' ,,,p;.�# PLR ~r'w't2ltP�;.T'S. i ,r. 4 ry ,,e ,., -u rc��. «. ra.�r LIT3: x Y,. :; li N'1 O �, T1� �, art7'Hw :,, C ({L ; ctr P1 i1 BEHIND L U13jr�V ;I :f-IN r it 14 -c,tr 'd 13Lr 3H41�i4r s�r�f arbT Cl�tii;TE,ST (]0 UN �, A R E r ri I � °f f a �` i 7 r:� 1) t rr ,JSIr ,�,Ft # • ,3 ») •Ci1LO't�raIaf'P OLOREI)''Lrl1Na >:'1L wf•Dt,:131:a'UI] }t�l'T rd L 1 IJ 13 '''L 1 , „� .':3 .: 0 R K 13 '} 'r � •r A T. t 'A 'A'� i i •a 7t' � bt.'.� . 3 G0Nf ►2 :(1'4) It., aiIf.1 L N TIFY ;f.,1IT:Y LI T]:LT1'i', ]:NF. ;l?CCTCIrt� 14 it Gh 'Crir V `l.' NtttiJlt;.VA �� (20';)''14'. J - O17`�''01 1 fMMI:'1',CLifi`I :W I j AND ttOtMPLETTQN OF ,WoRk rAT L.EA3T -424 HOURS IN AOVANcE; :;'rc” 4 Temporary 'el os 1 measures ;shall be i pip 1 erer!ted7;ras thtpt first, u: de'r• of busirie>s' "t'a Pr event sedimehtatiun • 51te, ?or into Oxistirfgl `tormlydr,ainage'` flci.1..itie5. • 5. Thta" it.e shall have,....perma ierlt t rosl.o t ,corttro1 . measures {" p1 ce a1 s possi•yble afr +eb'>r`'f nal4gr'aduliy.,riaa co0l feted .and' pr1c.1 to the r►a1 Art's Fie :iari t . Sid and cu] ^b ..rarrnp sh'a11, crcmpy'v with i:1ty; standat ria 7. Worf✓�,`Iaffectirty ti^af;fi'c ('f,:lrows''shalls ' be clnze1y coot di'ri terl, wil'h tthr: C ti;v`'`,Uti pe.ctcn ' T cf1 �r,,.t urtfiro1�� Pjansr aha1;1, be ubmr- ttecl, to ttke. Irrsppctrra� F fq•r r pr i'oi apr,t ^r3 v,µ :� ;{ } 8. ,Hau`t'} ;ny over ;, f; cv sha11. r;equ� ire ap3�'t�i'cat tart fu4 a° Haul lriu. Pet rmit�,pri.o .1, ��tb.:1prty _ass poi ate'd act s r 4..: .. .+ f � � s,« 9. The wa,ter meters bo-x shall be 1.o4atp,d wl'th�n .alr t 0' ord'e uti 1 i t;ki,'•easenient pit the pr•opertyi 1 3Yt.e` 4 gin. <A'. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: 00(/ Plan Check/Permit Number: Response to Incomplete Letter # 0 Response to Correction Letter # Revision # after Permit is Issued ML-oD?9 i; ' jf�t.JCj Project Name: :54719t. •.- 5110 f- p 04-LZ if 714e liL14 Gh O!r Project Address: Contact Person: 14 1 L.6 £)d2-(17S Phone Numbe . —069z( Summary of Revision: tin 51-ai 0'14- adz() vAgli 'F re i'�y Ci t o O 0 D . t S n �,�,c 1 1 Wit *iyUlt- Ifi•eildare, C-1,1911, Sheet Number(s): 1 of 1 S 1/Z "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: v ` U J Entered in Sierra on 06/29/99. 6300 Southcenter Boulevara4 Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fa: (206) 431-3665 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Date: PP/5-4/ 1% Plan Check/Permit Number: for s 9 -00 99 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter ❑ Revision after Permit Issued Project Name: B-ce_ 646171 P119"7� Project Address: / iiq Z / r rj 7 7417 -56-v Contact Person: ,/r/i i? i' /S Phone Number: ZS 3-07 42,-c), 9y Summary of Revision: 2 (o 1Yl� �/tcl45rc/, PAR M?olgi 44 £t.IILLW c */r.d �'- (v i Srd " Ot ycIc'pi p )rcf twalehletty ,ecau d - ,k5 " l' eof C rnclo4r Sheet Number(s) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. Submitted to City of Tukwila Permit Center RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER ❑ Entered in Sierra on 3/4/99 ferrnii- 0,00r-01.C:09 PLAN REVIEW/ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: MI98 -0099 DATE: 2 -25 -99 PROJECT NAME: BERGSTROM SUBDIVISION— UTILITIES Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # Xx Revision # 2 After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building 'vision ❑ Public Works Firevention Structural n Planning JJivision Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete Incomplete ❑ Comments: DUE DATE: 3 -2 -99 Not Applicable ❑ TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route No further Review Required Routed by Staff n (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) n REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 3 -30 -99 Approved Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. CORRECTION DETERMINATION: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions DUE DATE. Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: \PR.ROUTE.DOC 6/98 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division- Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: 2=-25-- PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: L\ I ( 57 v CONTACT PERSON: MI - ,06-1) 5 PHONE: 2�3-"37 y" Db 91/ PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: I r 1-9S QQ I ct 1Y1 Iv \sc /r' REVISION SUMMARY: w7d MW C RD RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 5 1999 trill; r CENTER SHEET NUMBER(S) REVISON NOZ. 1 "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: iJ h1 1.i r")001-YmiThrNj aecs,L 3/19/96 PLAN�REVIEWOU�NG SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: MI98 -0099 DATE: 12 -1 -98 PROJECT NAME: BERGSTROM SUBDIVISION Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # XX Revision # 1 After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division _ Public Works , 0V1 1.1 A Fire Prevention Structural' rm i lac&. Planning Division f er Pt Coo di for a DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete a Incomplete Comments: DUE DATE: 12 -8 -98 Not Applicable TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route n No further Review Required a Routed by Staff (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) REVIEWERS INITIALS. DATE: APPROVALS ORCORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 1 -5 -99 Approved Approved with Conditions n Not Approved (attach comments) n Core-fl (Q,C Ez �t REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved a Approved with Conditions a Not Approved (attach comments) 0 REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE' \PR•ROUTE.DOC 6/98 NOV 25 '98 12 :20PM TUKWILA DCD /PW c CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Divlslon•Permlt Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 P.1 REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: PROJECT _.(.('„30 -�• PROJECT NAME: . • . ..' € . ADDRESS:, / j'/ 1 CONTACT PERSON: IY) (Y REVISION SUMMARY: PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: (I Lqg- Goq 9 / - 5-7111 7V k'wi114 1)f31li PHONE: SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: REVISION N0. � CO:5144 PLAN RE EW /ROUTING'SL ACTIVITY NUMBER: M198 -0099 PROJECT NAME: BERGSTROM PLAT Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter. XX Response to Correction Letter # 2 Revision # After Permit Is Issued DATE: 9 -18 -98 DEPARTMENTS: Buildin ' Division Public - Fire Prevention Plan Division Strudtur+al Permit Coordinafor DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) DUE DATE: 9 -24 -98 Complete Comments: Incomplete Not Applicable ❑ TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route No further Review Required Routed by Staff (if routed by staff, make•copy to master file and enter into Sierra) REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 10 -22 -98 Approved El Approved with Conditions El Not Approved (attach comments) El REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION!: DUE DATE. Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIALS. DATE. \PR•ROUTE•OOC 6/98 ( CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: I °/15 PROJECT NAME: r p 14 / / 5cd,b II (ICJ (CJ V) PROJECT ADDRESS: 11192 -- z=5-7 ftJ PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: 0961 CONTACT PERSON: Ate- 1¼// PHONE: 10036.'i lee/I 9t/ - 99C 1 REVISION SUMMARY: SHEET NUMBER(S) / ��! C` 1 *I- nn i PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP t:,ord. Co ACTIVITY NUMBER: 1711- 9131. 009 -1 DATE: CH' RS PROJECT NAME: 13PrC+�Drn IVigIOn v Original Plan Submittal Response to Correction Letter # Response to Incomplete Letter Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Li Public !!Works IV Fire ;Lgtion Strucxya E DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete ❑ Incomplete PIS� nooning Di ision jAv Perm in tor41' DUE DATE: Al a/ Not Applicable Comments: TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route ❑ No further Review Required Routed by Staff n (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) a REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: '1'28118 Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved (attach comments)e Corr COPOn iVr 41° (%r is. REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved n Approved with Conditions U Not Approved (attach comments) El REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: \PR•ROUTE,DOC 6/98 CITY Oi . UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: / `-9d PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: All-g98 CO PROJECT NAME: ili,4iL' '1 PROJECT ADDRESS: / I1�'l7 -1 - 5-7 Je'rfW1 CONTACT PERSON: MI / 4i /4 PHONE: 29-3-0 71f` C76 /V • REVISION SUMMARY: V (6 (Oh ra #fp/ -th1 SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 1998 PER IT CEN ER PVI QJ 1 k_ CITY USE ONLY Planning:: Fire. ,'. ubllaifffOr 111 Q/Q6 L N V EW ROUTINaSLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M198 -0099 DATE: 6 -4 -98 PROJECT NAME: BERGSTROM PLAT XX Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # Revision After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Bui ing Division El Agtood)5° N6 Fire Prevention Siru tu al /A n Planning Division Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete E Incomplete Comments: DUE DATE: 6 -9 -98 Not Applicable TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route ❑ No further Review Required Routed by Staff n (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) C REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 7 -7 -98 Approved Approved with Conditions] Not Approved (attach comments) 1 0/LI'CI R VIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: ' i (C CA, CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved 0 Approved with Conditions E Not Approved (attach comments) E REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: \PR•ROUTE.DOC 6/98 t•-°' • • . • • ■ INSPECTION RECORD( ) Retain a copy with permi INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188f PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Project. _rAto-wl Type of inspection: C CAS Address: Mig/ ,57(1,14 g,„ Date called: 4.0-.9 Special instructions: Date wanted: 1/ 1/ a.m. p.m. Requester: - /14 fiCe f9wk Phone: :Approved per applicable codes. Corrections quired prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: u Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Receipt No! 1 Date: G;. INSPECTION NO CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING /DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECORD 61 9$ ., oci q Retain,a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206Y43,13, Project: 1A.6W- Type of Inspection: (-r .� Address: Date called: 5/1 °) a Special instructions: Date wanted: g �7 Y/�! a.m�' p.m: Requester: / 1)a.4A ` l 1' Phone: Approved per applicable codes. C erections required pior to approval. COMMENTS: f a 5 5-a r _57/4/ 4 $Jp cV 13D . �' Srr F/ Art44,0 %- y - ' 7/ po,c. .57:op f ,-Gu15 .5 4 e Vat,41 ,Eia 4 Sa LA Inspector. (IQ Dater /111 a $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. 1 Receipt No: 1 Date: j1. ' 'INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit- INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: , j . Type of Inspection: (CAS Address: / Date called: 6749 9 „Special instructions: Date wanted: , ,� ,, a.m. p.m. Requester: y� 61 Sa /57) 91 Ai4 Phone: CApproved per applicable codes. J Corrections rp'uired prior to approval; COMMENTS: 1:: q' /0 Fe w j4 - ,, q /th 5LegP 61 Sa /57) 91 Ai4 A 45'LfA tif lc 26141 4''WM s Ow /V.. 110 .s J4 Sae 6/ ..0v71 AO 74 P,, (ot _14-ee.40..,- >,,j -- i1s.g ._ �� r / fl /6 .4 ,. 6 , • ',,,. • Inspector: v Date: Sl (3JS 1 4-3 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: INSPECTION RECORD —0011 Retain a copy with permit I* INSPECTION NO • CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 Project: 61/1-1s11,- Type of Inspection: LA 'le7 _eA-A.1 4.i4e (kt-Ocril (D, , Address: Date called: / qi cil Cr._ &Mt i•AT-1-1.., -Put„....._k G en_ ,,,„ Special instructions: Date wanted: IL l I a.m. P.M. Requexer: Q k n4A / • IAA ()sr In co, 0 , J 1 Phone: 0 Approved per applicable codes. 'Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: • 'le7 _eA-A.1 4.i4e (kt-Ocril (D, , tk_t(46. 12yL4aLDIL4,-c. cAt it cil Cr._ &Mt i•AT-1-1.., -Put„....._k G en_ ,,,„ b-C1-k1 AO go 1 / U) 1— ,c. Cii)i- At--alt1 --14a4-AJ--- --b alP44 • IAA ()sr In co, 0 , J 1 InstieCtori'i ki Date: 0 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 1 Rprwint Nn, 1 Date: • INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ;.. #INSPECTION RECORD, ( Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (20)431 -3670 PC9ject:. ' Type of Inspection: n Addre : Date called: tJ rLek,, /-6-f g u s kii2if - 14v<i Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone: 0 Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: fav 5/A K{;) A-i. CIA- 141/1f OK 4_1Asv)-41 114_ 49.trq4 4-44 tJ rLek,, /-6-f g u s kii2if - 14v<i ro ,Ud4( . Sc o /,L -iiz 'C 7`v al -exAd 7 ,S.,04,(Aze C (.w /0 ie r ( £7-e4 A s Qelp /mot ` nikei $ •, Inspector: Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid 'at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. ktceint Nn: ~ Dale: INSPECTION NO. f fINSPECTION RECORD, Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188. • PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 PCgject:. '' Type of Inspection: / / 'u (..GQ C' (�-,t CG�t�pb�.-p�.�( Addre : Date called: , 1 .�' , ? f U.S ; e Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone: EApproved per applicable codes. Corrections required'prior to approval. COMMENTS: foG/ 5.m r- J(f - srl� / / 'u (..GQ C' (�-,t CG�t�pb�.-p�.�( . < < - .' ., y L.L.C, , 1 .�' , ? f U.S ; e RD ,vi4( ,s-c.c6 - ' Tit.E' 'ID ZI! h ci Ag-z c‹‘, ci-e-).-e-t iv &-e--4- 0/ s-Lip , 14-/t. ifif PA7(-4/i 14^-1/74 7l e.e»DitAi- -14ax.,7,0 Inspector: Date: lfrq 0 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at'6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. rReceint No: ( Date: nN" �7�' M�✓ ytiw. K' r�+ a: pTL^ tst34Jm*.^'+ ri++++•.r^- r?;,;':^,Yt?'r.,.1%, ",,bC"t'r.Pvt,. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit ,tf ' -"161 v INSPECTION NO. o A f RMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION �j 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project: f �f�l— $rid •� Type of in action: W N� -p `b Address: tco-i `J -?(( e.-�• Date called: ytii /9`% Date wanted: �� -.0jo, 7 a.m. Special instructions: . S.s.c741 Requester: '3`&,1 `,,, Phone No.: - LOT Approved per applicable codes. r Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 112019 Q ,D SrN- l I4* ple ..__i . S.s.c741 '3`&,1 `,,, - LOT cz s n.J-4 -1LQ. ulla-y Nom' y`' C6 Qom UA-�� 4. d at) ` e "e 6.AA I"4) �� � 190 -b SAlli 1. Inspector: Date: G $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100: Call to schedule reinspection. INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670. Pro' ct: Type of Inspection: j SC m,..C, 5 -U) • Cu-t..y.a.,, .0sAL,...,t,..4 wq..tztio...:-,:q GA Czy.o.s, Ad 1447 g? Gti Sc) Date called: 1),& -et 4 r,uk.Qa . Special instructions: Date wanted: `/// 07 a.m. P.m. Requesterzaa f`-e. (.,j /j/j r Phone: 0 Approved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1/22 1 C.04-k..e vt r c Ito - r v�� j SC m,..C, 5 -U) • Cu-t..y.a.,, .0sAL,...,t,..4 wq..tztio...:-,:q GA Czy.o.s, vl , 1),& -et 4 r,uk.Qa . 4111/0 )3J Girl J fei ` -!%,P. .fk .42 L i*d ra.. iix 42dalf a/ i„. Ei . 4.) /WO 5 r.J 4. / ' • � • ( ). Ay ^ 5,10 f /01. 1 S- tt.e. -4 O v$04191't- 3 -C' i51) /14- t in-A- .ca al 04 N- 0 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 1 Receint No: 1 Date: 0 ern`rrrs'm- 7,, n" fw6.1,73`111.7',2„zi.,�:v.,.. rr 7r3 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit 01% -ooll. INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION S 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Proje t: Type of,inspection: 8(41 6 Address: Dote called: 6f j it/I Special instructions: Date wanted: 41/(x / a.m. P.m. Roque er: /K& Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: r. Date:. i __Y/45 55 -..? ' r ' ybk i ' .- 109')-ti fit 5.5 4,1(1 4-1. b s14 2 5 k ) I-iTh 3, 9l, ,r (2,77 0, )Z1)31 11(,l5 lot). I airy tayr Art /5 w■ vy `v' erC yf 2fo -'- " -F ,1 5S ItttF, 1 4'17-i I AyAv,r,�f 6' 51 16 lit lib _'lb itiA 179d i, WHAA u// o1 AAU7 Gr Inspector: Date:. i $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedulereinspection. �11% -Doti :r, w::,,,4..• .+6+,14: terry:: """.�'1.:P, ✓' +STT,.Y!'F';,�w.tvra,ic1.c; Cr �n INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION S 6300 Southcenter Blvd.; #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Proje t: g/114^ Type of.inspection: Date:, 4//4- ak_rg6r__ @ Address: Date called: 'A i ii- / G u4 - �.... I. 1. S ecial instructions: P Date wanted:`r't ii 4 6,71 iii )z, , j), / � 1 a.m. p.m. Reque er: Phone No.: U/ r O f of - Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 61 V Date:, 4//4- ak_rg6r__ @ ---- -1U b1_65 4 l- 7� 1 Cl h/` /y____1441. , W/ 'A i ii- / G u4 - �.... I. 1. // 75 '1, 5 112 4 6,71 iii )z, , j), A 554u - l 5 -1v Li7"S 3, — ___5_M l Ll / 1 t / , i ,). NI i"9y " -kis( l5S yN U/ r O f of - y 2io ., aAA 1'- `" fit ;t s s NI P- I 1 16. £X 'v -• "Iii ( ,twh 6'' 51 To L4t li/b /OA i • � 0, 0' �L 1 Inspector: 61 V Date:, ' 1 -2/Iq P 1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Call to schedule'.reinspection. •. INSPECTION NO. IN'SPECTioN RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ali.1ERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 ProjgEt: 5'rAxliN Type of Inspection: CG A- S Address: 14'2 --f y'7 Al c,.. -< 50 Date called: i { 4 1 1 1 q Special instructions: Date wanted: j�1 151 p.m. a.m. Requester:/ i4(( MIS ( Phone: EJApproved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval, COMMENTS: II aAAAApraeA AILI { Date: f47i/11 '7 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. I Receint No: I Date: Inspector: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTI CORD Retain a copy wad; permit cia.J PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: #)) �/Z4 c Type of Inspection: /} C CCAS Address: i /CI 2,1 57 aay, 5, Date called: 03/// Specia instructions: Date wanted: tt t a.m. p.m. Requester: 6 47 �7 Z / 9 /' 7� Phone: m Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: nCorrections required prior to approval. 1 "yu\ rt.040-avve F Inspector: t/Vm rte v fJ. c �n� � �c - wow .L dvaJ [.J)d) .c tse 4 /r dLt _v Date: ///7 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid r at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Call to schedule reinspection. I RPCRint tJn• Date: ....qx,, ti t>77.wmtvt'Xt ,'¢rnig, 1t7,1;: r .p!m. w -i.»p; 3 . . INSPECTI•N-RECORD L. etain a copy with perthit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 rt PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project:', Type of.4nspection: ` C Address�f 01 Date called: Special inst otions: ..._ , Date wanted: a.m.. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: fi 1 e.A-P I, i Inspector: 6\1 Date: 3/14 $42,00 REINSPECTION FEE; REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at'6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. _ x INSPECTI 'F �ECORD Retain a coi`Jith permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project: - Type of inspection: CC A'S Address: Date called: „ (1 V(i �j / �� a.m. •.m. Special instructions: Date wanted: Requester,_ 01 / - aAnn4 )1,t/L4 1 Phone No.: i_cA.Aw, . Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: thA. 3/2--7/h 9 w______Autc_f., A i4 ___vms)-- 1,_±. atty,..+- i_cA.Aw, . (.29 lU up ////VVVVIIII } } }} if( i'-e-v+. 1 za )AJ • l.i , . • , V)-(..A ci P0,4 ki„, A, LA-.... ±-,„,....z., . Iii . _ (174,P-U. C -J14.. PEA t m-- fi Inspector: aJ Date: $42.00" REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd,, Suite 100, Cali to schedule reinspection; �:'" t21" 17 v+" TW'J,` .t1�3R1t"'i't.FMCf�!'�rs'�•7'�• !?,•v.H:.T"r.F,r �• � u;: •!!.'Yia' W-iv' 4L�;'�Y °a".i %:'i'.X; ;j' `. �J INSPECTION NO. INSPECTI' RECORD Retain a co h permit Gy PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project: ��� h Type of inspection: L (04,5- 04,S Date called: ,11 (7 ' Date wanted: 1� `t�/ � y a.m. p.m. Address: 57 A ct'k Special instructions: Requester c G N �, XI Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. r7 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: __ C j - Kb ► '�,� l. u. r 5 . I-) ', , \ .--/ / JA. ' %./v n.;+ -JL mo... S ki cAu +- T 2 uu 1 c t�. c vn, sTit,....d -ej . , el/Ask 6 nt / 4 4 p ?44. 1.. -, J� 1!�` S �- 1 "'mac CJ'.�d(LT�.. µ� d2- 6%1 7/t��rk —1 6c- �a cQ Y°.ci `." Aetu-a2t, � Inspector: A/Q -4" # 5u G � Date: 91 r 1 �] $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. • f INSPECTION NO. INSPECTI ECORD Retain a co j ith permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Projt" Type of inspection: GC A-S Address: Date c a l l e d : 3 1 .9 Date wanted. / / 7 7 a.m. p.m. Special instructions: Requ ,se ter: Phone No.:/ I Approved per applicable codes. Correc (ions required prior to approval. COMMENTS: cu .444 /. 31, 7� c/ s� /L2 _ ' ",P 67° rojAi-4,401-04s- cp-1(dvc,) c“/ &ve5r- 7z) o. Inspector: 6 a, I ate.. / $43;00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED prior to insp btion, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100,100,,c(11 to schedulIe rerhspection. • ' • �o-t"; 7G: Yi' r4ali�i�" �.kw%+�:�t�,..i�'�r:"`�''rrtS�C "�,'... VINSPECTI Retain a co "RECORD with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 �Ft^Si, , -;,':: �S aY"rAle YC,4�! ! " «:T CRMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Date called: 1 6-61_________ Address: Special instructions: Date wanted: < < a.m. p.m. Requester: ( , ?�XP�AC _ � Phone .:� Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1/9_ C.Jt:40-1 uska21_14Ao c 4 V . t(Vt wc\.p/l. crivit ilnspe or: T Date: ; /(I h9 (~i $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspectiori. ._. pP�r.. � �yM xyi, <�.w•'�nw.:.,e,. r�.4 ti!Mi:;r.:. t "".» "w" +•• � ^r +z•, INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 ( _ PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. Li Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: *154 +Z) —AA4A,MIA. _119-46tik__4 _4_,__ck.L4/40ctio 6L642i4j-: • Inspector:. Type of inspection: �Ai Date: Address: s: Address: Date called: iq 3l Special instructions: Date wanted: / t, a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone o.: Approved per applicable codes. Li Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: *154 +Z) —AA4A,MIA. _119-46tik__4 _4_,__ck.L4/40ctio 6L642i4j-: • Inspector:. i Date: .31 1'i 1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Call to schedule reinspection. e+rcr.*:« -?'.r' ivnt -n,, .•,... !+ti'?wv :_,:gt^rr -ary„ t7; INSPECTION RECORD I Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING bIVISIOI 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 vir,f)—`111 WERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: �./. Address: �/ Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: Approved pe(applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: dU`-QA `Q/4C'.eNJ 'e/ AACLe tii !.o s k� Coq S- ' FsZ -1 -iv c / c� -�It-�t 1 Inspector: 6'J $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. •-t•, .yrwgq!.rr ..A•; i�,:�....+�n. .. .. w:)6v, .i,rS4 INSPECTION RECORD "j Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Address: U Date called: Special instructions: — Date wanted: OZ� ��� am. pr Requester: /$t l Phone No j 79 3 (7qr Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Corrections required prior to approval. u � ► - Vr t S I Inspector: (j Date: jipl, [�^] $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, �,!._i`T����i1:yln:e }r� H'^'wgry� #;' +;'l+J+nj'. �'P*'�1%�F7r��i�- �S', y "T"-�i:';�SNW,+.�"{!ys- •"rsn -•; ".T.f.,,H...�....,... -:; .�q�.,.,- ...,,; � ..7-�. -i [� . - � i �:: 'ii .± ly.l$f� 7y �1.. a- k,•aMt.`;i INSPECTION RECORD NI Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Address: Date called: p� et instructions: Date wanted:' a� G%C{�' a.m.. p.m. Requester: / l4\ / 4 Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: t�l.. \). OL.A4k j ` I Inspector: (--1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd„ Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 re A t-,e micie0A*1 GQ„ JERMIT NO, (206)431 -3670 roiect: '" '' ` ` " '-r,� ` ` I 1 /q R 44 Type of In pection: Address: • ,t , Date called: 5p cial str�u lions: she Loti.A. ha•Am- wctizt t �i.e 10 itc m �0 �" Dat\/2-es 199 p.im: Request : , /rLAi 1 en f fr�7 =5 Phone: otx4461.t, 6141/t. 0 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: I 1 /q R 44 S r `�. L Te 5 I c ,4 .5o p 4t WuM t..►4n - 1 levi 1 ,t , koi -R SO O% TWO �W He (�Iv At / k..( - i Cyc.! v& QAv , ....m\ a au1- cir�.� S ti p S i f/) -c'lm. co/ k ureic 17) Q [--i± . r 'Inspector: Date: 444/9 7 E] $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, CaII to schedule reins ection. I•Raraint Nn• fiata� I • • INSPECTION NO, ;CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CAIPERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: �erd rorn Shor¢ P/a+ Type of Inspection: lick VT,• puny sample Address. 7, Ave. �0tA-f� Date called: 1 -2b -99 Special instructions: • Date wanted: 1 -27 99 a.m. p.m. Requester: i iii tiga41 a V Phone: U t r I i-t f e 5 'L0617g3 -b797 CApproved per applicable codes. ECorrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: t1119' ti,joi9A ox.,41 R.A4411. .Lt.., ' c ;a4,,.,.Qi 11 A '1v L6....,-4-...) r K p, OA f q 14,3azio CAr-eA._ c -211 % l`19 ast.c.Q, eck. ep-c. 1-, •. sa,A.441 ()lc 6 (1,- �� pp �11 C 1_ PA_ c ∎..� I c (fa C` ' -ci-k. . rYr Inspector:. [Date: i / y'Y/ 't! ;t $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, .Call to schedule reinspection. (Rarninl Nn. i r)nfo• • �zZ"o': �1.'A<.'S r:`':ti*�t w;. vim:; ±�•.�e6t;Ft.'!!,x'r. -*' .;•a:i- ..`.v:: �'oyr, w,w +K.v.M±:' .Y'; ;'''''$ 6..v?ci,•ti''i,.«.:.z. -INSPECTION „RECORD -- Retain a' copy with perm NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 ERMIT NO. 431 - 3670 Project: • i- --d'"■ Type of inspectlo : LJ -1.e i- Vgsq. ' s,7 r$� Date called: 9$ I — Y Special instructions: Date wanted: /— 6 ".rf g a.m. p.m. Requ Ie `& / /m JJNo.: j 3T /' Phone VGG -793- 67ci7 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1/7 cool/leo-kV 4171- 17/ Ser {/t G e golot c it, rI 5 7'-p ,`lr Wr7�� Pohl gc, .2-;`// '9,tC'.,QD Ilnspect j Date: //..4%/ $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. ' Prior, to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100,, Call to schedule reinspection, /-1 •INSPE.CTIONRECORD Retain a copy with perm) INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 IT NO. (2i)6}-431--73-6-70 Projec • / • itirry 1"A .S so - -A 3- iwed Froii \4kile r bps. -1-. JNf1,� /9I,oy) Type of inspection, .._1.1..., i3 /tic hs ` Aet e ! S7 /7 0 S Date called , 4% w 53 Special instructions: Date wanted: 1 —S--:-5‘6 a.m. p.m. RetSler: c Phone No.: au6 -7g3 -679? Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: • itirry 1"A .S so - -A 3- iwed Froii \4kile r bps. -1-. JNf1,� /9I,oy) ', -.- F r.�.. /' '7 10, - M►-�,.5 --- .._1.1..., i3 /tic hs ` 141-hir.1.y -1 hey c 4 //e 0 44,yry a -y o .rl_ye cf-- _ I,v9 r fer vi c. e . • Con n4 c7',orf Inspector: . �,e ' Date: $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must_ be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspectiop, 0 O : +yVM^. .. ?yy.•.xt. r r,qr� 3,�r {N.�}`"'�.i�?'iYT:A =�V •��;t°.Cc.�,t, rte; .7..,t���. •INSPECTION RECORD -� Retain a copy with perm,,...) INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100; Tukwila, WA 98188 MIT NO. j (206 -36i 70 Pro' ct: 1 Type of ins action: Address: r s- 7 .5. /Q o S r-- S /s-O Si Date called: / a - / Fr' -q? Special Instructions: Date wanted: / .7, — a /�- 7 a- a.m. p.m. Re S ster: 1. - Eac -/A 4 -e Phone -..7y3 - 79 7 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Corrections required prior to approval. CA O Imo/ )e Po5 -)n,, e J .12/I Z.,/Pr P9 ve Grsj P InspectorF i'' /A Z S Tr1 s ?e c Ji i1 % . k/atT it Date : /e/ $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite .100, :Call to schedule relnspection, p.... y���I:;nY 1Yrr:SRKaJ"•{FV .• j= vy`'M`^l v,1!;#4, ^?•�'•stkM0c -t. INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD,--- Retain a copy with pernLJ r`'1I58 -099 ��PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project: �^/ / ✓ c r- F"i•c% a'1 ..] �'1 c/i" V /°/ f Type of inspection: i.J cL r e ..N ei J....) Address: 7t' 4a S A S /S0 S 1.. Date called: /2-/7— 961 Special instructions: Date wanted: /2 _ /r-9g. a.m. ' -' Requester: Phone No.: b 7ti % So& —79.3 — Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: dive G r 4,e/r/ 0 LS 740 t-ri cioP cy Inspector:, 1411 Date: /Z� R $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. E.v ;Fi<yes+vtry 4,T":. ��t�:.n�,i', ;ai•';K,r:� ^itui_i;?'� x x'.:2%`kl'' "r�Mf.;d;;',".!"y,• ' 'M1 «�`7 ;';�:i�xr;�;y ',`rr ;:INSP CTION RECORQ, Retain a copy with per INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 Mr3g -oo961 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: Pia t7er4 +YDYh 5hori rh of inspection: .i- &c2- Ferma►rl Address: j s-74-1, AveSy S (sofaSf Date called: 12 —/b—gg Date wanted: % (a.m. Special instructions: Requester: •- vy) 66151161re Iiiih Phone No.: 20G / T?3 6787 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: fies :Inspector: Date: S4200 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to in • pectio , fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, r'f7 At. t~- "VoIrr*e∎�..,.,.'w^a. 'c. ur'r.Y!4 *''4" " rtg! 3TttN..r.- iT ...,;n*..•im'sr^^.- ....-.mNom,,. .;f„_'es,:w,w.rnk.c. INSPECTION NO. INSPEpTION RECORD Retain a copy with permiL. ff l i 9 0 -7304 ? ERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (20 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Address: l/ 149 2-/ -5-2 ,yam S. Date called: / 9g Special instructions: Date wanted; /f /2 3 a.m. 92 P.m. Requester: 04 /'J to Phone No.: L 1 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1143110 ran 70 5; (A , -, Dv- Y /Ay e !)Vl 0 . - 4 ,. r 46 61( r i .! /l ...4 G .� ti T a k 1 J-Ai /D U.A24 G( 1 a V---t f G ,r 1 / 1 4 _440 `/' 10‘14,-* kJ/Le/Le- // 16 0 &-+Leil A ✓ -C! . . • : /J 4 1 ■ I . .. i L ; ' ', Inspector: Date: i $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. ;;`.�a'�.r.�C;.a'tt+is! SAX' fi?�iiis, "txjt'tilc�;Y+i."'3,;r"'•..r�, � fw,. •l. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with perms INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,.Tu{iwiia, WA 98188 Project: Type of inspection: Address: WTI/ 57 J 5 Date called: S Special instructions: Date wanted: A, r , a.m. p.m. Requester: J�tyi / Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: J1/0 C t,,• (f a " 1 111/9h13 ,. wry „ 6 Inspector: Date: $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Callao schedule reinspection. INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd„ • #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 tti"m, siif .Y:M INSPECTION RECORD . Retain a copy with permiLP? :08 -0o59 RMIT NO. (20G) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: N. mC —4" Address: !419 i 52 5 Date called: _ J� Date wanted: 0 a.m. _Ao Special instructions: Requester: /�.. i T,�44,� I Anxi-- A r ikki, u ©-I i 4 Phone No.: 6J 4.40.i-d/N - Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: /_l,L/* f 4k—i -e 4 _ ` 0/ —4" tic Lul ( es' 6J/ L / ee.,JV C/ t34 loo / ,6,4 1. /•G& -.w,f' i __,..4(c4.1 4 - ° roe i _ / .. / JR A°. U'Y 1 / !'. 'i ,. !4 I Anxi-- A r ikki, u ©-I i 4 , y . 1.... _,.. ,r, 6J 4.40.i-d/N - 4 �� to A--7- /(/*z 6,4L4Lt timi& / /L4fJ / !� se Au, / f �/'� -, G 9v'Se!l f: _ A k4 ! 6t_i Inspector: Date: i $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter. Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permitkil) L 7 Fs -ctnq PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Safrl SD Date called: Address: 1992/ y7 A 5 Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: 1 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Corrections required prior to approval. 11/ \._cfz-i-X 2" Inspector: Date:'• 1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule relnspection. INSPECTION NO. • INSPECTION RECORD �1 ��� �� Retain a copy with perm PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 } 431 -3670 Project: Type of inspection: Al , q d IS-7 Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: 11141% a.m. p.m. Requester: E Lre Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: s4 r s * !o --c4 -44-4 3� (.;P 492 Ere i_ (- /// r/g� 1 3 Inspector: Date: (^^] $42.00 REINSPECTIONIyEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcentes Blvd., Suite 100,, Call to schedule reinspection. INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD cH Retain a copy with permitto,M CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. ‘--W-70 -1-(2 43'36 Project: crit—ON 1 Type of inspection: s Address: I'? AJ S Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. p.m Requester: Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Th STLAiL 5 Tv Inspector: Date: F1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, INSPECtION RECORD ' Aprr)g--GC� Retain a copy with permit 9 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100,' Tukwila, WA 98188 Project: berg5-tror» Type of inspection: SQL' -„... Address: / `' 412.1 57 Ave S Date called: /Q z8.. 98 Special Instructions: Date wanted: /U .2 9- q8 c.m. Requester: i7r�ce � Easilake. uplihes Phone No.:#2 r S b8,....78 36 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Corrections required prior to approval. _Lia08 NY it( 60,1,14 g r Inspector: Date:. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 11" '"• .. INSPECTION RECOR; Retain a copy with peak_ INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 rule -0017 2P'ERMIT NO (20 31 -3670 Project: e� Z r0 r'1 Type of inspection: C Sr-) E Address: 1y9-2-1 57 A,-, 5 Date called: lo- a6-143- Special instructions: s{w..,/ �b. ,,,o. Ic v..a 1 U - 2 it•- 5 Fr Date wanted: is -a k-- a.m. if P.m. Requesterr/� 1.i,V+C t. is<., J Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: AA 14 .0 w:1,40.)5 Inspector: yi4 �� A,�, 0. Yule Date: %.qV . $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must`. be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. .„ ....... . r,410,1,t.#0\ 0 INSPECTION NO. p Mt OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 • ' ter.m.F.A, Avilvt(citTA• .-• •%, -INSPECTION RECORr Retain a copy with per W99-0999 RMIT NO. (206) 31-3670 Project:ee, Ivan .61.19th" Y. Type of inspection: i L. ....—Oti t... Address: vigli S7 4 ...S Date called: /o/5 Special Instructions: Date wanted: a.m. P.m. Requester tie& &5./.10/7 Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: /L-tAr) Uttli-al rsc c_42 e:e_ 0 hAseire IInspector: Date: 1---1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. ?"7:77"7.5""77,7"/".471.7%, A ',;"77:377317.rrfrit77%774`1:77"rrIrrill1"7.111Mr4r7n, . , * * * 7* * * * * A * A * 11.4 * * * A * * A iv * * A * * * * * A .• C11-1 OF A W ..TRAN E3 141 I * * * * yk A * *l A**A***A****** AA * **.;* 47 * A. ** A * * * A * rRWgMI T 11Lt sober r, R 970084.1 . A m o « . 306 00 10/02./98 144 Payment 14ot:hodr, CHECK .Notation« .1.I13R ENTERPRISES lrn t r, flLH Permit No MI9E1...0099 Type« MI.E3,CPER,11 M113,CELLANEOLIS..PER143:T Par col 1./ o 113720-01.90 Site Addret,s: 14921 57 AV S Tot al -Fee. 5 r. 3617., 06 • i P a, y merit 306..00 Total LL Pmtc p 06.00. Ratance« '..00 ***** * A A -A * * A If A A 1: * A, #: A* A * 1 * VA ***AA 14.**.% * *#r 0, It. Account; Code • . Description :. Amount '- 0 0 0 / 4 5 . F.13 0 PLAN CHECK UTIL/T'V • '60.00 • 000/342'.400 INSP FEE' -.11TILIrt •- ." 401/342..400 . INSP. P,EE FL.H/LI/HME 30., p 41 2 / 3 4 2. 400 INSP FEE - sTon M..DRAIN 1 00 402/342.'400 INSP •FEE SME/SSS 000 / 322..100 • LAND ALTERING PE )11 . • . 12 0.0 000/345.1)30 1..AND ALTERING PLfIN CEIEC(< 30 0.0 ,friTrre March 7, 2000 Ciiy of Tukwila Department of Community Development HBR Enterprises, Inc PO Box 951 Sumner, WA 98390 RE: Release of Bond Bond No. LB4563 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Dear Sir: This letter hereby authorizes the release of the above referenced bond in the amount of $96,000.00 for . the completion of the on -site improvements, landscaping, signage and as- builts for Bergstrom Subdivision located at 14921 — 57th Avenue S, Tukwila. The work guaranteed under this assignment is complete and has been approved by the City of Tukwila. I have enclosed a copy of the bond for your reference. If you should have any questions, please contact our office at (206)431- 3672. Sincerely, Brenda Holt Permit Coordinator encl xc: Dirk Muyskens, CBIIC .. Permit File No. MI98 -0099 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila City of Tukwila DEVELOPER'S PR JECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORM opera authorized by ,city staffs; NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: '011 SON DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: pi Z/ - 5714' 'h, 3avth CASH ASSIGNMENT NAME: //3f' ieg pFZ/6 e 5 � 1A( C SHALL BE REFUNDED BY MAILING TO: ADDRESS: (nx 15 / (please print) CITY /STATE/ZIP DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBED): 1#3 DATE: (, -/ • 9 PERMIT NO.: /(4T9B -co 9 (..98-007/ TEL. NO. 2,53- 66 3 - 7708 4 hcd As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ 4 n r ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( t Z / ! t / 91 ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the pro•erty to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work listed a. • e r • ' o requesting inspection and release of these funds. SIGNED: ln TITLE: Pfd -S I ide (11- e. core piet — p efed y :.Glrt� THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. SIGNED: AMOUNT: it 16 000 DEPARTMENT HEAD: aisituaa.. C) CASH CITY RECEIPT NO. CASH EQUIVALENT DEPOSITED THIS DATE: RECEIVED BY: Wes, » ,45iv. whi....v.wensisivAs a» ,, A p/etQd.tiydevelopi 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: CHECKED BY: All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed and returned to department which authorized w- r- y. I hereby request inspection and release of my c a nt. th5�'1 DATE: , , < iQgg I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. PER MIT Ct " ISISCLT-ty) DEPARTTMMENT: tr AUTHORIZED BY: :tom MO CASH EQUIVALENT - LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE CASH CITY CHECK NO. AMOUNT: `i~i q (j OD RELEASED THIS DATE: ?J -1- WOO khh- — RELEASED BY: , FINANCE DEPT. Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD 00/13/90 • Calculation of all proposed improvements Bergstrom Plat 8- Jun -99 Item Sidewalks / Stairs Asphalt / final lift - tracts Landscape (Bluesky dwg's L1 & GN1) Bollards / signage Final plat mylar and as- builts Contractor MLW, Inc. Segale, Inc. Bluesky Landscape Eastlake / Nason sign co. Touma & Assc. 3,000,00 Incl. WSST 18,359.00 Incl. WSST 37,288.00 Incl. WSST 2,000.00 Incl. WSST 3,250.00 N/A Total Improvement cost $ 63,897.00 Bond amount 150% $ 96.000.00 rounded BONDS INSURANCE PLAT BOND WASHINGTON Bond No: LB4563 PREMIUM: $2,400 Ilome Office: Contract Surety 1213 Valley Street P. O. Box 9271 Seattle, WA 98109.027 (206) 628 -7200 (800) 765 -CBIC (206) 682.1558 FAX KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, • HBR ENTERPRISES, INC. called the Principal, and CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington Corporation, called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TUKWILA called the Obligee, in the sum of Ninety Six Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($ $96,000.00 ), for the payment thereof said Principal and Surety, bind themselves firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Principal is developing a certain tract of land in 14921 57TH AVE S.,TUKWILA, WA described as PROJECT NO. L98 -0071 RECEIVED CITY OF 11JKWILA ;and JUN 1 1999 PLAT IMPROVEMENTS FOR BERGSTROM SUBDIVISION PERMIT CENTER WHEREAS, as a precondition to approving the plat, Obligee requires that Principal make those improvements as more particularly set forth in CITY OF TUKWILA'S DEVELOPERS REQUEST FORM DATED 6/10/99 (hereinafter referred to as the Improvement Specifications) NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the Principal shall construct the improvements described in the Improvement Specifications on or before JUNE 14TH , 2001 (or within such further extensions of time that shall be granted by Obligee in writing and consented to in writing by Surety), then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. This obligation is subject to the following conditions: 1. This bond runs to the benefit of the named Obligee only, and no other person shall have any rights under this bond. No claim shall be allowed against this bond after the expiration of one year from the date set forth in the preceding paragraph, or one year from the end of the latest extension of time consented to in writing by Surety, whichever occurs last. 2. This bond is not a forfeiture obligation, and in no event shall the Surety's liability exceed the reasonable cost of completing the improvements described in the Improvement Specifications not completed by the Principal, or the sum of this bond, whichever is less. This bond is executed and becomes effective this 14TH day of JUNE CONTRACTORS BONDING HBR ENTERPRISES, INC. AND INSURANCE COMPANY By: Principal "( Its: C e. S l cQ 2n 1 By: DIRK MUYSKENS 1999 . Attorney-,in-Fact BndPLAH.01- WA012495 o :\mis\Create\b1100103 10.2.95 , cbic OON INSURANCE Limited Power of Attorney Home Office: 1213 Valley Street P.O. Box 9271 Seattle, WA 98109 -0271 (206) 622 -7053 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, and having Its principal office In Seattle, King County, Washington, does by these presents make, constitute and appoint DIRK MUYSKENS, of Seattle, Washington, its true and lawful Attorne•in•Fact, with full power and authonty hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, acknowledge and deliver:on behalf of the Company any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship given for any purpose, provided, however, that noAttorneyin•Fact shall be authorized to execute and deliver any bonder undertaking that shall obligate the Company for any portion of the penal sum thereof in excess of $6,000,000, and provided, further, that no Atlorneyin•Fact shall have the authority to issue a bid or proposal bond for any project where, it a contract is awarded, any bond or undertaking would be required with a penal sum in excess of $ 6, 000, 000; and to bind the Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as ff such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seal of the Company and duly attested by its Secretary; hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attornoyin•Fact may do In the premises. Said appointment is made under and by authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY cn September 8, 1998: RESOLVED that the President of the Company is authorized to appoint any person as the Company's lino and lawful Attorneyin -Fact with power and authority to execute and deliver on behalf of the Company any and all bonds and undertakings of suretyship given for any purpose, subject lo' such limits as shall be determined by the President of the Company; provided, however, that no such person shall be authorized to execute and deliver any bond or undertaking that shall obligate the Company for any portion of the penal sum thereof in excess of $10,000,000, and provided, further, that noAttomey- in•Facl shall have the authority to Issue a bid or proposal bond for any project whore, if a contract is awarded, any bond or undertaking would be required with penal sum in excess of $10,000,000. RESOLVED FURTHER that the authority of the Secretary of the Company to certify the authenticity and effectiveness of the foregoing resolution in any Limited Power of Attorney Is hereby delegated to the following persons, the signature of any of the following to bind the Company with respect to the authenticity and effectiveness of the foregoing resolutions as If signed • by the Secretary of the Company: Donald Sirkin, Steven A. Gaines, John Pieprzny, John A. Alkire, John D. Minto, Marc A. Mrkvicka, Larry A. Byers, Deena Fuller, and Eric Sirkin. RESOLVED FURTHER that the signatures (including certification that the Power of Attorney Is still in force and meet) of the President, Notary Public and person certifying authenticity and effectiveness, and the corporate and Notary seals appearing on any Limited Power ol Attorney containing this and the foregoing resolutions as well as the Limited Power of Attorney iisell and its transmission, may be by facsimile; and such Limited Power of Attorney shall be deemed an original In all aspects. • RESOLVED FURTHER that all resolutions adopted prior to today appointing the above named asAttorneyin•Factfor CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY are hereby • superseded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to besigned by its President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 8th day of September, 1998. CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY By: Ste aines, President STATE OF WASHINGTON— COUNTY OF KING On this 8th day of September, 1998, personally appeared STEVEN A. GAINES, to me known to be (ho President of the corporation that executed the foregoing Limited Power of Alfomey and acknowledged said Limited Power of Attorney to be the free and voluntary act and deed al said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he Is authodzed io execute the said Limited " Power of Attorney. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto se! my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for a •to of Washington, residing at Seattle ority of the Board of Directors of CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY, hereby cedillas, as or in lieu al Certificate of the Secretary of CONTRACTORS The undersigned, acting ti BONDING AND INSURANCEL'O PANY, that the above and foregoing Is a full, true and correct copy of the,Odginal Power of Attorney Issued by said Company, and does hereby further certify that the said • OFFICIAL SEAL MOLLY A HUDSPETH Mari Pu1Nc - Stat of l eslilnstan MY Caermrsuon Es res 1 -9-01 Power of Attorney is still in force and effect. GIVEN under my hand at __SEA this 14TH day of JUNF, .1s 99 :' 01,02•US092398 City of Tukwila Department of Public Works TO: Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator FROM: Joanna J. Spencer, Public Works Development Engineer, DATE: November 15, 1999 SUBJECT: Bergstrom Short Plat • Revision No. 1 Permit Number: MI98-0099 Review Approval John W Rants, Mayor James E Morrow, RE., Director The above revision received on Nov 4, 1999 covers installation of one additional fire hydrant in front of lot 14 , so future homes on lots 10 and 13 shall not be required to install a sprinkler system. This revision has been approved on Nov 15, 1999 and approval has been entered into Sierra Permit System. JJS/jjs cc: Applicant Development File PW Utilities Inspector 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • 71dcwila; Washington 98188 '‘,:PhOne:(206) 433-0179 ■1:F4#:(4:96),:43 4-99 jH0 5 09 PM ( — r) _, ;> c) 1 6 , z 7 Y Al -4 rn= 73 70 . 1 1 1 . 1 1 i . = , . . i . . .____._ . _ > > /b 1 i f 1.1k.,■.... 0 .104 . dal • 1. ....,... .... .,■. .11111011111 I I II....'_.... maim MEMEL - IMP 'IMT ME, i ' 4,14W iftill•-'11111.111211{3bAblA 1 4 t Mg? 1'. lilialillal....11/Mopm. . . . . . . . . . . . ..„. • . . .: .. 31141/11~VIDIIIIIIIIIII. E1. MAMMA 1.31,.,60.114114013 = ...■ IIMINIIINP ..■ a .. .1.. ISIMP*10014"alftrealPagalieall: r, IS I''.-..'it -...-?.-••••■ 1 TIMM MON. ,..-IngniMilalamiummilimanomo r A ..fri r g ji I rimiKol*.ir 41 P 2 t- • '0 - a t3 1 p3 ? i i lid 1 -3- •--1 — — J IAN ig -,.., C g "WU li . . &NOWA IP 111•1111111■9111716 MGM= 1111.111ft-- " V/ P I IN M i if PgvennFasazumairrAmmum • : ' T. gb..,:lirri. tratinill: araing • -1°.. . ..a.00. -'00r tr. I Eigh... ll ille rail si lim ii iJ- 1•34'34W cri ISCEP/PD $ECrin' FIC49p \In\I rukwiLA PUBLIC 1•1 NOV- 4 -99 THU ,:09 PM C Davis Consulting, Inc. 900 Meridian Ave East #19 - FMB 313 Milton, WA 98354 (253) 874 -0694 Faz (253) 874.5241 Fax Cover Sheet NO Y 4 1999 PUBLIC WORKS Date: I 1/4/99 Pages: 2 To: Greg Villanueva Company: City of Tukwila I+ax Phone: 206. 431.3665 From: Mike Davis RE: Bergstrom (The Junction) Dear Greg, Enclosed you will find a map of the Junction map with an 'X' marked for the location of the new fire hydrant. I met Nick (the Tukwila Fire Chief) this afternoon, he said that the two lots that will have to be sprinklered are lots # 10, 13 (new numbers as per the enclosed drawing). He said lot #10 is to be sprinldered because he will not allow us to count the hydrant in the southern plat (go figure 1). But it really doesn't matter because if we install one hydrant it will take care of both lots, Can we just install the Hydrant and revise our as- builts ? or do we need some sort of additional permit ? Thank -you for your attention to this matter. If you should have any questions please call me at the number listed above. Sincerely, e ' is Davis onsulting, Inc. NOV- 4-99 THU 5 09 PM u1 '•p M rn 70 A P, 2 4. tia 0 20 n s ,ZZ 134'34'W `m' NO V a' ?99 p ruK`l': ALA PUBLIC V4.0444.3 City of Tukwila DEVELOPER'S PRO..ECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORM CITY OF ECETUKWILA 'led' In byr daveIo .hard NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: CASH ASSIGNMENT SHALL BE REFUNDED BY MAILING TO: (please print) tae Rq sic Pigs/ - 57 NAME: r 1 m Pt-t • • I. DATE: y- 15-- c' diiERMIT CENTER PERMIT NO.: TEL. NO. 2 - D r- ADDRESS :x 7 s1 CITY/STATE/ZIP 6 Ri (,i) f - 9'W DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED (REFERENCE PLANS/DOCUMENTS WHERE ITEMS ARE DESCRIBED): ,jce frilikhed ast*llptic. by Terumw &v. 9/ Sldew, /r 4Mithrr, y pee fournA olehomigs C(- cli Znrtd sOpe j / t s i' < y 4 Mo/ne t 'GI E 6 s' hart- ftOirn9 ?Ion pc, Gut /llimi Prep d Apse. I z As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $ /6910 00 ($150% of value to complete work described above) and attach supporting documentation for value of work. I will have this work carried out and call for a final inspection by this date: ( 7 / ), or risk having the City use these funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or in -house manpower. If I fail to carry out the work, I hereby authorize the City to go onto the property to carry out completion of the above deficiencies. I further agree to complete all work II ve prior to requesting inspection and release of these funds. SIGNED: TITLE: • .............. ►..;Cam 7/I SIGNED: THIS FUND IS AUTHORIZED TO BE ACCEPTED. DEPARTMENT HEAD: AMOUNT: 0 CASH O CASH EQUIVALENT DEPOSITED THIS DATE: CITY RECEIPT NO. RECEIVED BY: »ocw<.ra•�v ...::,...:.,...aw„.,,< v v. <•,w,,, ..,.,.,. ,.,..,....<., • 'GT/ON 3 (io be comp fete by 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION FOR INSPECTION AND RELEASE OF FUNDS DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: All work identified in Section 1 of this form has now been completed and returned to department which authorized warranty. I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/cash equivalent. DATE: ,eamdl• • ••: CHECKED BY: " I have reviewed the above work and found it acceptable and therefore authorize the release of the above cash assignment. AUTHORIZED BY: Om ,,.l!eted> DEPARTMENT: CASH EQUIVALENT - LETTER AUTHORIZING RELEASE AMOUNT: RELEASED THIS DATE: CASH CITY CHECK NO. Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department RELEASED BY: , FINANCE DEPT. Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department TOUMA ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS Calculation of all proposed improvements Bergstrom Plat 9- Apr -99 Item Trenching / backfill sidewalks / grading Sidewalks / Stairs Asphalt / final lift - tracts Landscape (Bluesky dwg's L1 & GN1) Street Lights (William Popp dwg's #1,2) Final plat mylar and as- builts Contractor Eastside Utilities, Inc MLW, Inc. Segale, Inc. Bluesky Landscape Signal Electric Touma & Assc. Total Improvement cost Bond amount 150% Amount 18,987.00 Incl. WSST 13,037.00 . Incl. WSST 18,359.00 Incl. WSST 37,288.00 Incl. WSST 21,193.00 Incl. WSST 3,250,00 N/A 6632 S. 191st PI., Sulte E -102, Kent, WA 98032 • ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF HBR ENTERPRISES, INC. (253) 863 -7708 STATE OF WASHINGTON MAY 0 7 SECRETARY OF ATE KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the undersigned. Brent O. Rollins for the purpose of forming a corporation under the laws of tlx: State of Washington, and in pursuance thereof does hereby sign and acknowledge the following Articles of Incorporation, and states as follows: ARTICLE 1. The name of this corporation is and shall be HBR ENTERPRISES, INC. ARTICLE The corporation is to have perpetual existence, ARTICLE III. The general nature of the business of the corporation and the objects and purposes proposed to be transacted. promoted and carried on by it. are as follows: I . Land Development 2. In furtherance of and not in limitation of the general powers conferred by the laws of the State of Washington. it is expressly provided that this corporation shall also have the tollowing powers: (a) To purchase or otherwise acquire. so tar as permined by law, the whole or any pan of the undertaking and business of any person. firm or corporation and the property and liabilities, including the good will. assets and stock in trade thereof. and to pay for the same either in cash or in shares. or partly in cash and partly in shares. (b) To purchase or otherwise acquire. and to hold, maintain, .vork, develop. sell, lease, exchange, hire. convey, mortgage, or otherwise dispose of and deal in, lands and Leaseholds, and in any interest. estate and rights in real property and any personal or mixed property, and any franchises. rights. business or privileges necessary, convenient and appropriate for any of the purposes herein expressed. (c) To acquire by purchase. subscription. or otherwise. and to hold for investment or othcnvisc, and to use. sell. assign. transfer. mortgage. pledge. or otherwise deal with or dispose of stocks, bonds. or any obligations or securities of this or any corporation or corporations: and to merge or consolidate with any corporation in such matter as may be providcd by law. (d) To Borrow money, and to make and issue notes. bonds, debentures, obligations and evidences of indebtedness of all kinds. whether secured by mortgage, pledge or otherwise. without limit as to amount. except as nnay be prohibited by statute. and to secure the same by mortgage, pledge or otherwise. and generally to make and perform agreements and contracts of dvery kind and description. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 5 1999 PERMIT CENTER (c) To conduct and carry on its business, or any part thereof, and to have one or more offices, and to exercise all or any of its corporate powers and rights in thc State of Washington, and in the various states, territories. colonies and dependents of the United States. in the District of Columbia, and in all or any foreign countries or country (f) To do all and everything necessary. suitable and proper for thc accomplishment of any of the purposes, or the attainment of any of the objects, or the furtherance of any of the powers herein above set forth, either alone or in association with other corporations, firms or individuals, and to do every act or acts, thing or things, incidental or appurtenant to or growing out of or connected with the aforesaid business or powers. or any part or parts thereof provided, the same be not inconsistent with thc laws under which this corporation is organized. (g) To have such powers as are conferred upon corporations under thc laws of this state. and to engage in any lawful business. ARTICLE IV. The aggregate number of shares %%•hich the corporation shall have authority to issue:, including the classes thereof and special provisions. are a follows: 50.000 shares of common stock, which is the only class of shares authorized and which are to be without par value. The aggregate value of all the shares shall be 550.000.00. Pre- cmptive rights shall exist and shareholders shall have thc right to cumulate votes in the election of directors with respect to shares of stock in the corporation. Each share shall be untitled to one vote. The holders of common stock are entitled to receive the net ;+ssets of the corporation upon dissolution. ARTICLE V. The authority to make B. -Laws for the corporation is hereby expressly vested in the Board of Directors of this corporation. subject to the power of the shareholders to change or repeal such By- Laws. The Board of Directors shall not make or alter any By -Laws their qualifications, classifications. terms of off ice or powers without first securing the approval of the shareholders. ARTICLE VI. The shareholders rest:rve the right to amend, alter, change, or repeal any provision contained in these Articles of incorporation in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute. and all rights conferred on the corporation herein are granted subject to this reservation. ARTICLE VII. The street address of the initial registered office is 12901153r1 Street Court East Edgewood. Washington 98372 and the name of the initial registered agent at such address is Brent 0. Rollins RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWItA APR 151999 PERMIT CENTFP (F The management of this corporation shall be vested in a board of directors; the number of initial directors shall be 1 and the subsequent number, qualifications, terms of office, manner detection, time and place of meeting, and powers and duties oldie directors shall be such as are prescribed by the By -Laws of the corporation. The names and addresses of the persons who arc to serve as directors until the first annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors be elected and qualify, are as follows: Name Address Brent 0. Rollins 12908 53°' Street Court East Edgewood, Washington 98372 ARTICLE IX. The names and address of each incorporators) is as follows: Brent 0. Rollins 12908 53'd Street Court East Edgewood, Washington 98372 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the incorporaters have hereunto set their hands in duplicate on 'nals this 6th day of May, 1998, under penalty of perjury. Brent • Rollins, Incorporator , CONSENT TO APPOINTMENT AS REGISTERED AGENT TO: Secretary of State 505 East Union, 2nd Moor PO Box 40234 Olympia, Washington 98504.0234 1, Brent 0. Rollins. do hereby CO1154:111 to serve as registered agent for the corporation: MIR ENTERPRISES, INC. Dated the 6th day of May, 1998. Address of registered agent: 12908 53'd Street Coun East Edgewood, Washington 98372 (253)863.7708 TUKWILA DRIVEWAY SECTION BERGSTROM PLAT 20' ► 7' 6" 7' 6" 2% 2% i 2' 6" COMPACTED SUB BASE AS REQUIRED 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE (COMPACTED) 4" CRUSHED SURFACING (COMPACTED) 4" THICK CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRACT "C" REVISION N0,2 20' 7' 6" 7' 6" 2' 6 2X 2X RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 2 4 1999 PERMIT CEN ppPkovr,0 Apt' PO 15011i� r COMPACTED SUB BASE AS REQUIRED 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE (COMPACTED) 4" CRUSHED SURFACING (COMPACTED) TRACT "D" M 1q8 -0Cqg r C City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 24, 1998 Mr. Mike Davis 900 Meridian Avenue East, #19 -313 Milton, Washington 98354 Dear Mike: SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #3 (Revision submitted December 3,1998) Development Permit Application Number MI98 -0099 Bergstrom Subdivision - Utilities 1492157 Av S This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your revision for your development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Public Works Department. At this time the Building Division, Planning Division and the Fire Department have no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, -eeca Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: MI98 -0099 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4413670 • Fax (206) 4413665 .. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: December 18, 1998 PROJECT NAME: Bergstrom Subdivision Revision Number 1 PERMIT NUMBER: MI98 -0099 Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Gary Barnett at (206) 433 -0179 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. The Public Works Department does not approve the proposed revision. The drawing C4 of 11 indicates placing gravel next to the curb in lieu of landscaping. Gravel is not an acceptable substitute for landscaping. Additionally, gravel is maintenance intensive and tends to spread out onto the traveled surface. The landscape area should remain planted with vegetation. The revision submittal sheet dated 11 -30 -98 requests a change of the vehicle access areas of tracts A, B, C, and D to asphalt versus brushed concrete. This change is not acceptable, the differentiation between brush concrete and asphalt is intended to demarcate a separate pedestrian lane distinct from the traveled way. The applicant shall coordinate any changes to the pedestrian demarcation with the Department of Community Development to achieve conformance with preliminary plat conditions. Similarly, the applicant shall coordinate any design changes with the department of Public Works for conformance to sound engineering practices for pedestrian safety, constructability, drainage control, maintainability and ability to support maintenance equipment. The applicant shall coordinate any design changes with the Fire Department to insure that fire apparatus can use the access roadway as intended. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 -0179 • Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works NOTIFICATION OF UTILITY PERMIT ACTION TO: Permit Center FROM: Public Works Engineering DATE: September 29, 1998 SUBJECT: Bergstrom Plat 14921 57 Ave S Project Number: PRE97 -014 Permit Number: MI98 -0099 Contact Person: Mike Davis Phone: (253) 874 -0694 Ross A. Eamst, P. E, Director THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED ON SEPTEMBER 29, 1998: PERMIT FEE Channelization 25.00 Fire Loop Hydrant 45.00 Curb Cut/Access /Sidewalk ✓15.00 Storm Drainage v25.00 Land Altering "156.00 Sewer Main Extension (Public) ✓ 25.00 Water Main Extension (Public) 125.00 TOTAL: $306.00 Two copies of the confirmed Utility Permit Application and plans are attached for inclusion in the permit file. JJS /tkf CF: Development File (with copy of application and plans) PW Utilities Inspector (with copy of application and plans) Finance Dept. (with copy of application) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 4334179, • Pax (206) 4313665 Memorandum DATE: September 11, 1998 TO: Mike Davis FROM: Moira Bradshaw RE: Bergstrom Final Plat The following comments concern the recent August 28 submittal. When the following changes are made, the plans may be approved. The Landscape plans must be attached to the full set. Tract C has been modified on the Landscape plan but the sidewalk has been moved so that it doesn't line up with the existing sidewalk on S. 150 Pl. Sheet C- 1 Modify Tract C to show width and use of easements. The location of bollards is inconsistently show on the various plan sheets. There should be three locations: South end of tract C and the east and west ends of Tract A. The location within the tract is also important. The location within Tract A should be immediately adjacent and touching the corner of the junction of sidewalks /driveways. The location of the three bollards within the driveway of Tract C should be coordinated with Public Works. Modify the various sheets to be consistent and avoid confusion. Sheet C -4 Modify bollard detail to show a four inch concrete collar around base to act as a mow strip. Bollard signage must be per my August 13 memo to Gary Barnett. Modify the residential driveway detail to show a planter width of five feet typical. Sheet C -5 Modify the Tract C and B so that the driveway width is ten feet with a adjacent five foot sidewalk and two and a half foot shoulders on either side so that a 20 foot wide driveable surface is maintained for fire apparatus. In Tract C the width of the driveway will increase to all a minimum of 20 feet from the western curb and northern terminus of S. 150 Pl. in the Brigadoon Plat. The color we had discussed would be appropriate for the drive surface rather than the walk. cc: Joanna Spencer, File PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: September 16, 1998 PROJECT: Bergstrom Subdivision PERMIT NO: MI98 -0099 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1. Please revise your plans per recent HCW -L Engineers comment letter dated September 3, 1998 and subsequent discussion with Public Works staff._ SEP- 9 -98 VIED 9:32 AM 89/88/98 17:12 To:Mlike Davis MEMORANDUM From :Bob Bergstrom TO: GARY BARNETT, CITY OF TUKWILA TOM TOUMA, TOUMA ENGRS MIKE DAVIS, DAVIS CONSULTING BILL POPP JR. POPP AND ASSOCIATES LYE" .ic-eo,i 206 4331 3665 FAX 425 251 0625 FAX 1 253 874 5241 FAX 425 454 0187 FAX 1 4r. a.... FROM: BOB BERGSTROM, HCW-L, SEATTLE 1. SUBJECT: TECHNICAL REVIEW SUMMARY ON BERGSTROM PLAT IN TUKWILA DATE: SEPT. 3rd, 1998 Comment Summary. This is the Third edition, updating the Aug 18 Memo. Please direct your commentary to me at FAX # 206 632 0947. Plat and General Comments. Received revised CC&R's dated 1/9198. All issues resolved C-1 Site & Topo & Boundary 1, The existing Utility easement behind Lots # 19 and it 20 need a permanent all weather access easement road to the CB's behind the SW corner of lot it 20. CITY STAFF REQUEST. Not shown In 9/3/98 Submittal C-2 & 3 Drainage end Road Plan 2. The Trail Stairs need details with Railings detailed. REB, JH. Final decision to Ms. Bradshaw In Community Development Decision has been deferred to her, 3. General comment on Private Drainage. Provide individual storm drainage stub outs to each lot from the Public Storm Serer. Provide Smooth bore ADS N -12 pipe. REB. Not shown in 9/3/98 Submittal. 4, The Tract C pavement seems to expand beyond the area indicated se Tract C in the legal exhibits for the Tract C boundaries. REB. The City will investigate with the Building Dept. 5. The Oil and Water Separator must be relocated under the sidewalk area. CITY STAFF REQUEST. C-4 Storm and Road Details All Issues resolved C-5 Tract Cross- Sections and Notes All issues resolved C-6 & 7 TESCP All issues resolved C -8 & 9 Sanitary serer All issues resohred C -10 & 11 Water Plan All Issues resolved Street Lighting All Issues resolved Separate Popp and Associates Submittal L1 & 2 Landscaping Plan All Issues resolved Touma and Blue Sky Submittal Thank You Bob Bergstrom HOW-t. Engineers 4010 Stone Way North Seattle WA 98103 Tel: 206 632 2664 toll free 800 562.7707 Email: Elmaaltviab vl. eve 1 SEP 9 1998 PVLUCW RKS P. 2 09/09/98 10:34 To:Gary Barnett From:Bob Bergstrom 206- 632 -0947 Page 1/2 .y` FACSIMILE COVER PAGE Date: 9/9/98 Time: 10 :34 :06 Pages: 2 To: Gary Barnett Company: City of Tukwila Fax #: 431 3665 From: Bob Bergstrom Company: HCWL Address: 4010 Stone Way N Suite 300 Seattle , Wa 98103 Fax #: 632 -0947 Voice #: 632 -2664 0G Copyr ght Cheyenne Sofware, Inc. FAXSERVE 09/09/98 10 :34 To:Gary Barnett MEMORANDUM From:Bob Bergstrom TO: GARY BARNETT, CITY OF TUKWILA TOM TOUMA, TOUMA ENGRS MIKE DAVIS, DAVIS CONSULTING _ 206- 632 -0947 Page 2/2 206 4331 3665 FAX 425 251 0625 FAX 1 253 874 5241 FAX FROM: BOB BERGSTROM, HCW -L, SEATTLE 1. SUBJECT: TECHNICAL REVIEW SUMMARY ON BERGSTROM PLAT IN TUKWILA DATE: SEPT. 9th, 1998 Comment Summary. This is the Fourth edition, updating the Sept. 3rd Memo. Please direct your commentary to me at FAX # 206 632 0947. Plat and General Comments. Received revised CC &R's dated 1/9/98. All issues resolved C -1 Site & Topo & Boundary 1. The existing Utility easement behind Lots # 19 and # 20 need a permanent all weather access easement road to the CB's behind the SW corner of lot # 20. CITY STAFF REQUEST. Not shown in 9/3/98 Submittal 2. The cul -de -sac Planter Island exceeds the maximum width of 20 feet (in North — South Dimension). Revise Planter Island dimensions FIRE DEPARTMENT. C -2 & 3 Drainage and Road Plan 3. The Trail Stairs need details with Railings detailed. REB, JH. Ms. Bradshaw concurrence. 4. General comment on Private Drainage. Provide individual storm drainage stub outs to each lot from the Public Storm Sewer. Provide Smooth bore ADS N -12 pipe. REB. Not shown in 9/3/98 Submittal. 5, The Tract C pavement seems to expand beyond the area Indicated as Tract C In the legal exhibits for the Tract C boundaries. REB. The City will investigate with the Building Dept. 6. The 011 and Water Separator must be relocated under the sidewalk area. CITY STAFF REQUEST. C -4 Storm and Road Details All issues resolved C -5 Tract Cross - Sections and Notes All Issues resolved C -6 & 7 TESCP All issues resolved C -8 & 9 Sanitary Sewer All issues resolved C -10 & 11 Water Plan All issues resolved Street Lighting All issues resolved Separate Popp and Associates Submittal L1 & 2 Landscaping Plan All Issues resolved Touma and Blue Sky Submittal Thank You Bob Bergstrom HCW -L Engineers 4010 Stone Way North Seattle WA 98103 Tel.: 206 632 2664 toll free 800 562 -7707 E -mail: Rbergstrom @hcwl.coni RECEIVED SEP 0 8 1998 PUBLIC WORKS City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 18, 1998 Mr. Mike Davis 900 Meridian Avenue East, #19 -313 Milton, Washington 98354 Dear Mr. Davis: SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #2 Development Permit Application Number MI98 -0099 Bergstrom Subdivision 14921 57 Av S This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your application for development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Planning Division and the Public Works Department. At this time the Building Division and the Fire Department have no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, Liose,&509i Kelcie J. Pel'erson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: MI98 -0099 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 o (206) 41313670 .• Fax (206) 41313665 11 W�wa1Mr.lwtfNalaM4� City of Tukwila 41;,\( J (200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, IVashinyton. 98188 TO: /1o' /6'9 FROM:UzQ- DATE: ei/9798 su1 JECi: �''��Om 415horz/t9/ae- lt'11r98'a63'9? MEMORANDUM mYta•exV rraeti�ert:..e+ax015555 (206) 433.1800. Fri Fck) rn e e-6' co Al /L-4 Q / /ueo _s the /1d5c4r ,sly mho tae tectu.ced z`c..›�h u/d e_ atieLou,6)A �;•�(' © c.�. /r -7144,- �'22 1/1-L Cie . �1 e /V/J•S 15401/Lei) I s/ , _4 al/mews/W-1_ - (/ L'T01Q 190 e XCeed / ` 'h 'S clokided r- ';%1212 -o t4 l City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 4, 1998 Mr. Mike Davis 900 Meridian Avenue East, #19 -313 Milton, Washington 98354 Dear Mr. Davis: SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number MI98 -0099 Bergstrom Subdivision 1492157 Av S This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your application for development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Planning Division and the Public Works Department. At this time the Building Division and the Fire Department have no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, *it .WZON49,77 Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: MI98 -0099 ti Davis Consulting Group, LLC 900 Meridian Ave East #19 -313 Milton, WA 98354 (253) 874 -0694 Fax (253) 874 -5241 Monday, August 31, 1998 Joanna Spencer City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: AGI - Geotechinal report (Bergstrom Plat) Dear Joanna: Enclosed you will find an additional copy of the above referred pursuant to your request at our meeting on Friday, August 28th, RECEIVED AUG 3 1 1998 PUBLIC ORKS Thank -you for your attention to this matter. If you should have any questions please call me at the number listed above, Sincerely avis Davis Consulting Group, LLC A Report Prepared For HER Enterprises P.O. Box 951 Sumner, Washington 98390 AGI IECH+.QLD(IES GEOTECHNICAL.ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED BERGSTROM PLAT DEVELOPMENT. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON June 2, 1998 Keith A. Ward, P.E. Project Engineer AGI Technologies 11811 N.E. 1" Street, Suite 201. Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/453 - 8383 AGI Project- No. 16,215,001 .. TEC W.CHUGES TABLE OF CONTENTS AGI 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 GENERAL 1 12 BACKGROUND 1 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK 1 2.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 2.1 SURFACE 3 2.2 SUBSURFACE 3 2.3 GROUNDWATER 4 3.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 5 3.1 GENERAL 5 3.2 SUBSURFACE 5 3.3 EARTHWORK 5 3.4 FOUNDATIONS 6 3.5 FLOORS 6 3.6 SITE DRAINAGE 6 3.7 UTILITIES 7 3.8 SLOPES 7 4.0 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8 4.1 GENERAL 8 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 8 4.2.1 Stripping, 'roofrolling, and Excavation 8 4.2.2 Structural Fill 8 4.2.3 Fill Placement and Compaction 8 4.2.4 Slopes 9 4.3 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA 9 4.4 FOUNDATIONS 9 4.5 FLOORS 11 4.6 DRAINAGE 11 4.7 RETAINING STRUCTURES 12 4.8 UTILITIES 12 5.0 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 13 5.1 GENERAL 13 5.1.1 Description 13 5.1.2 Standard Specifications 13 5.1.3 Reference Standards 13 5.2 EARTHWORK 13 52.1 General 13 AGI EECH.(, UGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS 52.2 Materials 14 5.2.3 Quality Control 14 5.2.4 Seepage Control 14 52:5 General Excavation 14 5.2.6 Structural Excavation 15 527 Structural Fill Construction 15 5.2.8 Utility Trench Backfilling and Compaction 16 5.3 DRAINAGE 16 5.3.1 General 16 5.3.2 Concrete Slab-on -Grade Drainage 17 5.4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 17 5.5 CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY 17. 6.0 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES 18 7.0 REFERENCES 19 DISTRIBUTION FIGURES APPENDICIES Appendix A: Field Exploration Appendix B: Laboratory Sampling •AGI i ECHhOIOGE LIST OF ILLLJSTRATIONS Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Plate Al Plate A2 — A3 Plate B1 Site Vicinity Map Site Plan Typical Slope Keying and Benching Typical Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall`' Typical Footing Subdrain Typical Utility Trench Unified Soil Classification System Test Pit Logs Particle Size Analysis Test Result 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL AGI IFGHPsOLOGIFS This report summarizes AGI Technologies' (AGI) geotechnical engineering investigation at the proposed Bergstrom Plat Development in Tukwila, Washington (see Figure 1). The geotechnical investigation will supports the development of the site for residential housing. AGI provided engineering services for the referenced site in accordance with our proposal dated May 6, 1998. The services were authorized by Mr. Brent Rollins of HBR Enterprises on May 18, 1998 by signing our service agreement. 1.2 BACKGROUND Prior to this investigation, AGI completed a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation of the site and prepared a letter report dated June 3, 1997. The study was conducted to identify geotechnical and geologic issues that would affect the proposed development and to provide recommendations that would assist the design team in developing a conceptual development plan. No erosion or landslide hazards were identified in the study, but AGI recommended that a detailed slope stability analysis be performed on permanent slopes over a 2:1 (horizontalvertical). The site is a 4.2 -acre lot bounded by 57th Avenue South to the east, residential property borders on the other sides. Based on the development plans supplied to us from OTAK Engineering, dated January 13, 1998, and on conversations with Mr. Tom Tuma of Tuma Engineering, your general civil engineer, we understand that the existing 150th Street will be extended into the site to terminate in a. cul de sac, as shown on Figure 2. We also understand that the proposed roadway grades will be reached by lowing the existing grades in these areas. Additional site development will also include placement of utilities prior to construction of the single family housing units. Complete earthwork or structural details for the individual residential properties are not known at this time; however, we anticipate that the structures will be lightly loaded. 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to analyze subsurface conditions and to provide recommendations to assist with the design and construction of the site improvements. Our specific scope of services included the following elements: • Reviewing background information from our files from other geotechnical investigations performed nearby. We also reviewed readily available information provided in geologic and soil survey maps. • Providing excavating equipment and staff to excavate 4 test pits to maximum depths of 6 to 8 feet below ground surface (bgs). Obtaining grab samples from the bucket of the excavator and if possible, obtaining relatively undisturbed soil samples. • Performing laboratory analysis (i.e., moisture /density and particle size testing) on selected samples to aid in characterization of soils encountered. AGI f icH'.QLLGII S • Performing engineering analyses as a basis for evaluating foundation and pavement support compared to subsurface conditions encountered. We evaluated the suitability of onsite soils for use as structural fill and the bearing capacity and settlement of foundation elements. We also evaluated modulus of vertical subgrade reaction for support of slab- on -grade floors, lateral earth pressures for retaining structures, and groundwater issues. • Preparing this report detailing our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Section 2.0 of this report describes site surface and subsurface conditions, Section 3.0 presents a discussion and our conclusions regarding the project, and Sections 4.0 and 5.0 present our . recommendations for design and construction, respectively. Appendices A and B, respectively, describe our field exploration and summarize laboratory testing procedures and results. 2.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2.1 SURFACE AGI i ECHM)LOG,ES The site is bounded by residential housing units and undeveloped lots on all four sides. The housing units on the south property boundary appear to have been constructed within the last 10 years. The site also borders two streets. A portion of the east property line is bounded by 57th Avenue South, and the west property line will intersect South 150th Place. Fencing surrounds most of the property. The site slopes downward to the west at grades from 3.2 to 16 percent. A majority of the site is covered by field grass and briar patches. Mostly deciduous and a few •coniferous trees are growing on site and range in size from 4 to 40 inches in diameter. During our site visit, no standing water was observed, although we did observe standing water in low lying, poorly drained depressions during our previous study. A small, overgrown drainage swale, trending east to west in the western quarter of the site flows into a catch basin near the terminus of South 150th Street and the west property line. 2.2 SUBSURFACE AGI explored subsurface conditions by excavating four test pits within the area of the proposed development as shown on Figure 2. The test pits were excavated to depths of between 4.8 to 6.4 feet. Test pit activities were monitored by an AGI geotechnical engineer who examined and classified the soils encountered, obtained representative soil samples, and recorded pertinent information including stratigraphy and groundwater occurrence. Soil units encountered were classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. A log of the each test pit, as well as details of our field exploration, are provided in Appendix A. Soil units encountered are described below in their stratigraphic order of occurrence: Topsoil: Brown topsoil was encountered at the surface of each test pit and was characterized by a high percentage of organic material in the soil matrix. The topsoil was between 6 to 12- inches thick. Weathered Glacial Till: Below the Topsoil deposit, Weathered Glacial Till (Weathered Till) was encountered in all the test pits. The Weathered Till consisted of gray to reddish silty sand that was fine to coarse grained. Some fine to coarse gravel and roots and occasional cobbles were also present. The deposit was in a loose to medium' dense condition and was moist based on field observations and laboratory test results. Weathered Till is characterized by medium to high strength and low to medium compressibility. Unweathered Glacial Till: Underlying the Weathered Till, Unweathered Glacial Till was encountered in all test pits except TP1. The deposit was present to the maximum depth of test pit TP3 at 5.8 feet bgs and to 3.5 and 5.0 feet bgs in test pits TP2 and TP4, respectively. The Unweathered Till consisted of gray to brown silty sand that was fine to coarse grained. Some fine to coarse grained gravel and cobbles were also present. The Unweathered Till was in a dense to very dense condition and was moist based on field observations and laboratory test results. Unweathered Till is characterized by high strength and low compressibility. In test pit TP4, the deposit consisted of a layer of gray and reddish brown sandy silt that was fine grained. The layer was hard and moist based on field observations and the silt was slightly blocky in consistency. - �- AGI fECHr.OEOCIES Advance Out-wash: This deposit was encountered underlying the Unweathered Glacial Till deposit to the maximum depth of test pits TP2 and TP4 (6.4 and 6.0 feet, respectively). The Advance Outwash deposit consisted of brown sand that was fine to coarse grained. Some fine to coarse gravel and trace silt were also present The deposit was in a dense to very dense condition and was moist based on field observations and laboratory test results. Because the deposit was also overridden by a glacier, similar to the Glacial Till deposits, Advance Outwash is characterized by high strength and low compressibility. 2.3 GROUNDWATER During our investigation, groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits. We did not observe standing water or seepage on the site, however, we were not able to inspect all of the surface . due to dense surficial vegetation, particularly in the western quarter of the site. 3.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 3.1 GENERAL AGI TECH )LL)CIES Based on the results of our subsurface investigation and laboratory and geotechnical analyses, we believe that the proposed development can be constructed at the site, provided that the recommendations in this report are implemented. This section summarizes our overall conclusions and recommendations regarding the site subsurface, earthwork, foundations, floors, site drainage, and utilities. Specific design and construction recommendations are presented in Section 4.0 and 5.0, respectively. 3.2 SUBSURFACE Based on field reconnaissance, results of our subsurface exploration, and review or geologic maps (Waldron et. aL, 1962), it appears that the soil deposits encountered are native and of Glacial origin. Geologic maps indicate Vashon Glacial Till is the surface soil deposit expected in this area. Vashon Glacial Till is characterized as a mixture of silt, sand, and graveL In some areas the till can be thin and consists of loose silty sand and graveL In other locations, the till is thick and, where cemented, can be very difficult to excavate with normal earthwork equipment The till is glacially consolidated and, therefore dense, strong, and relatively incompressible. Both Weathered and Unweathered Glacial Till are present. The Weathered Glacial Till deposits, overlying the Unweathered Glacial Till is till material that has been physically and chemically weathered by freezing and thawing, root intrusion, oxidation, reduction, and other processes. The deeper Advance Outwash deposit was also glacially consolidated and is generally characterized by a very dense gravelly sand mixture with varying degrees of silt. It is also characterized by high strength and low compressibility. Advance Outwash deposits were not geologically mapped in the immediate area, but are typically encountered below Tills in the Puget Sound area. The majority of the soils underlying the site are relatively impermeable due to the high proportion of fine- grained materials (Le., silts) in the soil matrix. 3.3 EARTI-IWORK We understand that earthwork necessary for placement of the roadway will involve lowering grades by up to 4.5 feet. Clearing of the site will involve removal of vegetation, topsoil, and an existing building. We expect that only shallow excavations for footings and utilities will be required planned. We recommend maximum depths of 2 feet bgs for footings bearing on the Glacial Till or Advance Outwash. Concrete slab -on -grade floor systems and pavement areas may bear directly on either undisturbed Till or the Advance Outwash deposit;. The native Weathered and Unweathered Glacial Tills and Advance Outwash deposits are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. Wet weather may therefore present practical constraints on the use of On -Site FilL Accordingly, we do not recommend its use during these periods, typically between October and May. Imported Select Fill has limited moisture sensitivity and can generally be used to achieve high relative compaction in periods of wet weather and throughout the year. ompnit2i5 001 Barprom wr D...ri lin' N.p31.mc 5 AGI IIGW.OlDGlf S Excavation of the Unweathered Till deposit may be difficult using conventional earthwork machinery due to its cemented nature. Ripping bars to scarify the deposit may be necessary. 3.4 FOUNDATIONS We judge that a conventional shallow foundation system, such as spread footings, will provide satisfactory support for the proposed single family housing units. Foundations should bear on either Unweathered Till deposit, the Advance Outwash deposit, or Structural Fill. The consistency of subgrade material used for foundation bearing should be field verified by the geotechnical engineer before placing concrete for the foundation system. Provided fills are placed and compacted and foundations and footings are constructed as described herein, we estimate total settlement will be Iess than 1/4 -inch. Differential settlement should be less than 1/2 -inch over 50 feet. Specific design and construction recommendations are presented in Sections 4.0 and 5.0, respectively. 3.5 FLOORS A concrete slab -on -grade floor system is appropriate provided the floors are founded on undisturbed Till, Advance Outwash, or Structural Fill. Before placing Structural Fill, the subgrade should be proofrolled as described in Section 42.1. We also recommend the underslab drainage measures outlined in Section 4.6 be included. 3.6 SITE DRAINAGE Because the majority of the surficial site soils are moisture sensitive and relatively impermeable, both short- and Long -term drainage control measures should be included in project design and construction. Over the short term, we believe site and construction drainage can be reasonably well controlled by careful excavation practices. Typically, these include, but are not limited to, shallow upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms, and temporary sumps in excavations to collect seepage and prevent water from damaging exposed subgrades. Drains should be included at the bottom of all temporary slopes to collect surface water flow from the slope and prevent it from flowing onto exposed building subgrades. All collected water should be directed under control to a positive and permanent discharge system, such as a storm sewer. Over the long term, more permanent measures such as installation of footing and wall drains, should be included. All permanent drains should be directed to a positive and permanent discharge point well away from the structure. Roof downspouts should not be connected to footing and wall drains, but should be tightlined separately to their discharge point. This will avoid the potential for roof debris to be washed into footing and well drains and possibly blocking them. Cleanouts should be provided for both footing and wall drains and the downspout tightlines. Specific site drainage recommendations are provided in Sections 4.6 and 5.3 of this report. O.WPfl16.215.001 Brawn Pr1 Dwdoarwi Riout.doo 6- 3.7 • UTILTITES AGI Utility work for the proposed development will likely involve only shallow excavations (i.e.. less than 4 feet bgs). However, if utility trenches deeper than 4 feet are planned, dewatering may be necessary to allow placement of utility services, backfill, and compaction. For this reason, dewatering options, both short and long term, are discussed in the Section 5.2.4. 3.8 SLOPES We did not perform slope stability analyses because the planned grades are not steeper than 2 :1 (horizontal to vertical). ONIFT111,215.0018ergsno Prl Owwi p d RiPati e 4.0 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL AGI TEC N4)UE)GIES The following sections present our design recommendations for use by you and your other consultants on this project It is important to remember, however, that for satisfactory and successful construction of this project, the recommendations must be applied in their entirety and in conjunction with the construction recommendations provided in Section 5.0 of this report. 4.2 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 4.2.1 ,$tripping Proof rolling, and Excavation Our subsurface exploration encountered soils that we judge competent for foundation bearing. However, if unsuitable soils, such as organic rich soils, are exposed during construction, material beneath proposed foundation, slab -on -grade floors, and paved areas should be excavated to depths below planned subgrades as shown below. • Shallow Foundations : • Slab -on -Grade Floor : • Paved Areas: 2 feet 1 foot 1 foot Removal of unsuitable material should extend at least 2 feet laterally beyond the foundation perimeter at the excavation base. Before placing Structural Fill to establish foundation or pavement grade, the exposed soil should be proofrolled or hand probed and unsuitable soils overexcavated as recommended below. 4.2.2 Structural Fill Soil materials used to establish grade beneath structural elements such as spread footings and floor slabs should consist of Select Fill Material or On -Site Fill Materials as defined in Section 5.2.2, and compacted to the following minimum relative compaction: • Foundations and Floor Slabs: • Pavement Subgrades: 4.2.3 Fill Placement and Compaction 95 Percent 95 Percent (upper 2 feet) Upon completion of stripping, general excavation, proofrolling, and overexcavation, Structural Fill should be placed as described in Section 5.2.7 to achieve design elevations. The existing deposits are suitable for use as On- Site Fill Material provided they can be properly moisture conditioned and compacted. As discussed in Section 3.3, these soil deposits are moisture sensitive and accordingly they may be difficult to achieve the minimum relative compaction requirements during periods of wet weather, typically between October and May. Buried Topsoil is unsuitable for use as On -Site Fill MateriaL Soil materials used to establish grade beneath structural elements such as spread footings and floor slabs should consist of Structural Fill. Structural Fill is On -Site Fill Material or Select Fill Material, as n1111/711111 ]IS WI EMeasdw Phil orYm.ri R.ea4 me AGI If CHP.OICKd&S defined in Section 5.2.2, compacted to 95 percent minimum relative compaction for foundations and floor slabs. 4.2.4 $topes We recommend that all fill slopes steeper than 10 percent be constructed by keying and benching the fill into firm native soil as shown in a schematic on Figure 3. Due to the low permeability and corresponding high fines content of the native soils, keyway subdrains should also be installed as shown on Figure 3. We recommend that both temporary and permanent slopes be constructed as follows: • Temporary Slopes (maximum height of 4 feet) should be constructed as follows: -- Cut : -- Fill : Maximum 1 -1/2:1 (horizontakvertical) Maximum 1 -1/2:1 • Permanent Slopes (maximum height of 15 feet) should be constructed as follows: --- Cut : — Fill : Maximum 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) Maximum 2:1 All permanent slopes should be planted with a rapid - growth vegetative cover as soon after completion of slope construction as possible in order to limit the possibility of erosion. The vegetative cover should ideally incorporate the use of large and small vegetation to produce a vegetative mat with both deep and shallow root systems. 4.3 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA Structural design for seismic forces should be accomplished in accordance with the appropriate building code. For this site, using Table 16 -J, Site Coefficients, on page 2 -34 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code, the following values are appropriate: - Site Conditions : - Site Coefficient : 4.4 FOUNDATIONS medium -dense to dense or medium -stiff to stiff soil profile with soil depth greater than 200 feet S2 - 1.2 Spread footings should be designed using the following criteria. Foundation - Bearing Soil -- Structural Fill and Existing native Unweathered Glacial Till or Advance Outwash Deposits • Minimum Footing Depth of Embedment AGI TICH .o O(IEs — Perimeter Footings : 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final exterior grade — Interior Footings : 16 inches below top of floor slab • Minimum Footing Lateral Dimension — Spread Footings : 24 inches — Continuous Footings : 18 inches • Allowable Soil Bearing Pressures — Spread Footings: 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) — Continuous (Strip) Footings: 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) • Lateral Load Resistance' — Passive Resistance : 420 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) equivalent fluid weight — Coefficient of Friction : 0.37 • Settlement — Total Settlement : less than 1/4 inch — Differential Settlement : less than 1/2 inch over 50 feet — Time Rate : Approximately 90 percent during construction • Modulus of Vertical Subgrade Reaction, K, — Unweathered Glacial Till,, Advance Outwash or Compacted Structural Fill: 235 kips- per cubic foot (kcf) i Allowable soil bearing pressures are for all dead and live loads and may be increased by one-third for temporary short-term wind and seismic loads. • 2 The passive resistance includes a safety factor of 1.5 and is based on the assumption that all footing backftll has been placed and compacted as recommended in Section 5.2.7. The upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected' in design computations unless protected by pavement or a slab -on- grade. The coefficient of friction includes a safety factor of 1.5. AGI IEC HMILDGI E S 4.5 FLOORS Design criteria for floors are as follows: • Subgrade : Undisturbed Till or Structural or Existing Fill • Capillary Break : Minimum of 4 inches of free - draining sand and gravel containing Iess than 5 percent fines (silt and clay -sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch mesh sieve). • Vapor Barrier : In areas where moisture would be detrimental to equipment, floor coverings or furnishings inside the building a vapor barrier should be placed beneath the concrete floor slab. Reinforced plastic sheeting is satisfactory for this purpose. • Protection Measures : A layer of sand, approximately 2 inches thick, may be placed over the membrane to protect it from damage, to act as an aid in curing of the concrete slab, and also to help prevent cement paste bleeding down into the underlying capillary break. • Modulus of Vertical Subgrade Reaction : 235 kips per cubic foot (kcf) for undisturbed Unweathered Glacial Till, Advance Outwash, or Compacted Structural Fill 4.6 DRAINAGE Design criteria for drainage are as follows: • Footing Excavation Drain : In the event that groundwater seeps into footing excavations, it should be possible to remove it by gently sloping the base of excavation to one or more shallow sump pits and pumping the water from there to a positive permanent discharge sys tem. • Footing Drains : These drains should be installed after construction of the building footings and immediately before backfilling against building stem walls. A typical detail is presented on Figure 4. • Surface Runoff : Interceptor ditches or trenches or low earthen berms should be installed along the upgrade perimeters of the site to prevent surface water runoff from precipitation or other sources from flowing over the face of excavated slopes or onto graded areas. • Downspout or Roof Drains : These should be installed once the building's roof is in place and the following criteria should be followed. — Discharge in tightline to positive, permanent drain system. -- Under no circumstances connect these tightlines to the perimeter footing drains. Q.1RP111d215.001 Baronial Mal Dmloanni RwalLicc AGI I�HhOI.p(,IES 4.7 RETAINING STRUCTURES Earth retaining structures may be required if final design grades or other site constraints will not allow for keying and benching. Retaining walls can consist of conventional retaining walls such as cast -in -place concrete or gabion gravity walls provided that their foundations bear in the undisturbed competent native soils or structural fill Alternatively, we recommend constructing Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls (MSE). Depending on the site constraints, MSE walls can typically be constructed much more economically, particularly in fill slopes. An MSE wall consists of a concrete block wall with a soil reinforced backfilL A schematic of a typical MSE wall with general construction recommendations are shown on Figure 5. If needed, AGI can assist you in designing an MSE wall. We recommend the following design lateral earth pressures and lateral load resistances be used when designing retaining structures: • Design Lateral Pressures -- Wall free to rotate at top: -- Wall fixed at top: -- Traffic surcharge (where applicable): • Design Lateral Load Resistances' 35 pcf equivalent fluid weight 55 pcf equivalent fluid weight 250 psf over upper 10 feet of wall — Passive Resistance : 420 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) equivalent fluid weight — Coefficient of Friction : 0.37 A rockery is not a retaining wall or structure. The primary function of a rockery is to protect the slope face by preventing soil erosion and sloughing of dense, native soils. A rockery wall would not be suitable for protecting cuts into the looser Weathered Till deposit. A rocker wall would be suitable in the dense Unweathered Till and Advance Outwash deposits. 4.8 UTILITIES All utility line excavations, particularly beneath paved or floor slab areas, should be properly backfilled with Structural Fill to the specified degree of compaction, or better. Figure 6 provides a pictorial representation of our recommended design. 3 The passive resistance includes a safety factor of 1.5 and is based on the assumption that all footing backfill has been placed and compacted as recommended in Section 5.2.7. The upper 1 foot of soil should be neglected in design computations unless protected by pavement or a slab -on- grade. The coefficient of friction . includes a safety factor 0( 1.5. H.OD11.•'14I NI 4 12.. 11_ 5.0 CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL 5.1.1 Description AGI I ECHP.O DC4ES This section presents our recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of construction. Specifically, we cover structural excavation and drainage. Our design criteria are based on these construction recommendations; therefore, these recommendations should be incorporated into the project specifications in their entirety. • 5.1.2 Standard Specifications Where possible, we refer to the 1994 Edition of the State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 5.1.3 Reference Standards Reference Standards are referred to by agency or association initials and are from the latest editions of the following : ASTM - American Society for Testing Materials 5.2 EARTHWORK 5.2.1 General Earthwork consists of clearing and stripping, excavating, placing and compacting fill, utility trench backfilling,, structural excavating and backfilling, and all subsidiary work necessary to complete the grading of the developed areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes shown on the plans. Terms used in this section are defined as follows: • Percent Compaction is the required in -place dry density of the material, expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry density of the same material as determined in the laboratory by ASTM Test Method D1557 (Modified Proctor). • Optimum Moisture Content is the moisture content (percent by dry weight) corresponding to the maximum dry density of the same material as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. • Moisture - Sensitive Soil is on -site soil containing more than 5 percent fines (silt- or clay -sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3 /4-inch sieve. • StructuraI Fill is fill material placed and compacted in areas that underlie structures or pavements. It should consist of either On -Site Fill Material or Select Fill Material compacted to the Percent Compaction specified in Section 4.2. 0 V1171116.216 001 Berwyn Ni Icanort Rmf.d: 13- AGI I ECHMOEOGIES • Foundation - Bearing Soil is the soil on which conventional spread footings are cast. It should consist of undisturbed Unweathered Glacial Till or Advance Outwash exposed by excavation, or Structural Fi1L 5.2.2 ?vfa teria is • On -Site Fill Material is the soil obtained at the project site during excavation (following clearing and stripping) that is free of organic contaminants, perishable material, and rocks or lumps greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension. The native Weathered and Unweathered Glacial Till soils are moisture sensitive due to their high fines content. Therefore, we do not recommend use of this material during the wetter months, generally between October and May. The deeper, Advance Outwash deposit may be suitable for use during these periods. • Select Fill Material is imported soil consisting of clean, free- draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. 5.2.3 Quality Control The contractor should be made responsible for quality control of the earthwork. As the geotechnical engineer provided by the owner, we can observe and test the contractor's work for conformance with the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications. The contractor should be required to provide us with every reasonable facility for checking the workmanship for conformance. We will prepare a daily record of our observations and tests, which will be made available to the contractor and to the owner. You may wish to consider making the contractor responsible for retesting work if it fails to meet the requirements of the plans and specifications, and for the associated costs of such retesting. The contractor should submit samples of each of the required earthwork materials to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation and approval prior to use. The samples should be submitted at least 4 days prior to their use and sufficiently in advance of the work to allow the contractor to identify alternative sources if the material proves unsatisfactory. 5.2.4 Seepage Control Runoff or groundwater seepage that would interfere with the contractor's work should be controlled during construction. Control may consist of temporary drainage ditches or subsurface drains either of which may remove water by gravity drains or use of sumps. Installation of such measures should be the contractor's responsibility. 5.2.5 General Excavation General excavation consists of removing unsuitable on -site soils to sufficient depth to achieve design grades. The contractor should be responsible for excavating and disposing of or reusing excavated materiaL Estimated depths of excavation range from approximately 2 to 5 feet, depending on the specific location. In general, the on -site soils can be excavated using standard earthmoving equipment. If earthwork operations are performed during periods of wet weather, these soils will deteriorate in the excavation process. Foundation bearing may also become disturbed, requiring repair. C R171111111S 1101 Marna Pr G.accert R...( dna -14- AGI TECHNOLOGIES After design grade is reached, exposed soils should be proofrolled to identify soft or unstable areas requiring additional excavation and replacement with Structural Fill Proofrolling should be accomplished with a heavy, rubber -tired vehicle such as a loaded dump truck or a steel drum vibratory roller. Soft soils encountered during proofrolling should be excavated and replaced with Structural Fill. All final surfaces exposed by the complete excavation should be finished true to line and grade and present a smooth, firm surface. After a rainfall, construction equipment should be prevented from traveling on the exposed site subgrade until the soils have been allowed to dry sufficiently. Otherwise, traffic activity on the wetted subgrade will degrade the exposed materials and result in additional excavation of the disturbed materials. Such additional excavation should be performed at the contractor's cost. 5.2.6 Structural Excavation The work addressed in this section covers excavation and backfill for structural elements such as the proposed building foundations and parking and drive areas. Excavation for footings should be performed after site preparation is completed and any necessary Structural Fill has been satisfactorily compacted in accordance with the specifications. Excavation of footings should be made so as to avoid disturbing or loosening adjacent soils. Footing excavations should extend into Foundation- Bearing material to the depth shown on the plans. Excavations should be kept free of water at all times and all loose material should be removed from excavations prior to placement of formwork, reinforcing steel, concrete, or backfilL The contractor should inform the geotechnical engineer after the footing excavations have been completed and before placement of reinforcing steel, formwork, or concrete. We will then observe foundation excavations and provide written confirmation that the footings bear on the expected Foundation- Bearing material During wet weather, in areas where the exposed subgrade consists of Moisture - Sensitive Soils, the contractor should take measures to protect foundation excavations once they have been approved by the geotechnical engineer. These measures could include, but are not limited to, placing a layer of pea gravel, crushed rock, or lean concrete on the exposed subgrade, or covering the exposed subgrade with a plastic tent. If additional overexcavation is required because the subgrade was not protected, the cost of such additional work should be borne by the contractor. During dry weather, the contractor should take measures to protect the foundation excavation's exposed subgrade soils from drying out. These measures may include watering the subgrade as necessary. If the subgrade soils dry out and become loose, they should be moisture conditioned and recompacted to the Percent Compaction specified. After placing foundation concrete, backfilling with Structural Fill should be performed. 5.2.7 Structural Fill Construction This section covers placement and compaction of earth materials to create Structural Fill. If grading is performed during the wet winter months, generally October through May, we recommend that On- Site Fill Material be used only if it has been drained sufficiently well to achieve the required compaction. n WOfl1[91S MI tams.. Plwl florimnret Rm(dee - 1S. AGI TECH'.O1O .IES The On -Site Fill Material or Select Fill Material should be moisture conditioned to within 3 percent of Optimum Moisture Content, placed in level lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and compacted to the specified percent compaction to produce a firm and unyielding surface. If field density tests indicate the required Percent Compaction has not been obtained or the surface is pumping and weaving under construction traffic, the fill material should be reconditioned as necessary and recompacted to the required Percent Compaction before placing any additional materiaL Fill slopes should be compacted by slope rolling and trimming, or should be overfilled and trimmed back to plan grade to expose a firm, smooth surface free of loose material. 5.2.8 Utility Trench Backfilling and Compaction This section covers backfilling of all utility trenches. The contractor should be responsible for the safety of personnel working in utility trenches. We recommend all utility trenches, but particularly those greater than 4 feet in depth, be supported in accordance with state and federal safety regulations. Utility trench backfill should consist of Structural Fill constructed as recommended in the preceding paragraph of this report. If backfilling is performed during periods of wet weather, it may not be possible to achieve adequate compaction with On -Site Fill Material unless it is sufficiently well drained. Within building areas and the upper 2 feet below subgrade in pavement areas, utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 95 Percent Compaction. Below 2 feet in pavement areas, it should be compacted to at least 90 Percent Compaction. Particular care should be taken to make sure bedding or fill material is properly compacted in place to provide adequate support to the pipe. Jetting or flooding is not a substitute for mechanical compaction and should not be allowed. 5.3 DRAINAGE 5.3.1 General This section covers the placement of aggregate drainage materials and drain lines in the areas and to the lines and grades shown on the plans. The materials that should be used are as follows : • Capillary Break should consist of a minimum of 4 inches of free- draining sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (silt and clay size particles) based on the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. • Free - draining Granular Material should consist of clean, free- draining gravel or crushed rock meeting the requirements of Section 9 -03.12 (2), "Gravel Backfill for Walls," in the Standard Specs cations. 010.1111.215. - 16- AGI fECHNOLCK1ES • Drainpipe should be a smooth- walled, rigid PVC or other rigid pipe conforming to the minimum sizes and dimensions shown on the plans. Corrugated plastic pipe should not be used because it has a tendency to mush and become blocked, and is often laid without a gradient. • Vapor Barrier should consist of an impermeable membrane of reinforced plastic or equivalent material 5.3.2 Concrete Slab -on -Grade Drainage After all structural and utility trench backfills are satisfactorily compacted and subgrade preparation is completed, the Capillary Break should be placed in a manner to prevent segregation and should be compacted with appropriate vibratory equipment to provide a tight particle interlock. Any free water that has collected in the Capillary Break should be drained or removed by pumping before concrete is placed. The contractor should exercise care during installation of the Vapor Barrier to provide at least 12 inches of overlap between individual sheets. Care should also be exercised during construction to prevent puncturing or tearing the membrane. If such punctures or tears occur, the contractor should cover the affected area with an additional section of Vapor Barrier. 5.4 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER We recommend you retain AGI as the geotechnical engineer during construction to observe and test the geotechnical aspects of the contractor's work. At a minimum, this should include proofrolling, fill placement, and foundation preparation. Other observations may be required by permitting authorities. This will allow us to compare the actual conditions encountered with those expected by this investigation and to modify our recommendations, if necessary. We will be present at the site on a part-time basis to check that the contractor's work conforms with the geotechnical aspects of the plans and specifications. Our daily field reports and final report form an important record of construction. Observation and testing by the geotechnical engineer, however, should not in any way release the contractor from the responsibility of performing the work in such a manner as to provide a satisfactory job that meets requirements of the project plans and specifications, or from meeting contractual obligations to the owner. 5.5 CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY The scope of our services did not include construction safety practices and this report is not intended to direct construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described, and then only for consideration in design, not for construction guidance. The contractor should be made responsible for construction site safety and compliance with Local, state, and federal requirements. WOMAN s.001 Brpr'vi FW o. rs Repo I.M 17- AGI 1fCH.OLO .1ES 6.0 LIMITATIONS AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of HBR Enterprises, its contractors, and consultants for this project only. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and our experience and engineering judgement. AGI cannot be held responsible for the interpretation by others of the data contained herein. Our services have been performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. We must presume the conditions encountered are representative of the entire property. However, you should be aware that subsurface conditions may vary between exploration locations and with time, and unanticipated conditions can and often do occur. If differing conditions are exposed during construction or the design is modified, we should be retained to reevaluate our recommendations and provide a written confirmation or modification, as necessary. We cannot be responsible for the applicability of our recommendations if not afforded this opportunity. To allow for these eventualities, a contingency should be provided in both your construction budget and schedule. AGI should be retained to review final project plans and specifications to verify the intent of our recommendations have been properly interpreted and included. Because of the judgement required to distinguish unsuitable material, we should also be retained to provide construction monitoring services during the geotechnical phases of construction, particularly during foundation and pavement preparation. This will allow us to verify subsurface conditions are as expected, and to observe and test the contractor's work as your representative. awn 11,215.001 argennv Plot Qnsioperl Aipddoc AGI TECH ,OLOGIES 7.0 REFERENCES Waldron, H.H., Liesch, BA, Mullineaux, D.R, Crandell, D.R , 1962 The Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity Washington, United States Geological Survey, Map I -354, Cµ. DISTRIBUTION AGI 1E H2OIOGIES 2 Copies 1 Copy HBR Enterprises P.O. Box 951 Sumner, Washington 98390 Attention: Mr. Brent Rollins Davis Consulting Group, LLC 900 Meridian Avenue East #19 -313 Milton, Washington 98354 Attention: Mr. Michael Davis Quality Assurance / Technical Review by: can M. White, P.E. Principal Engineer KAW /DMW /Ill: w.n en... •.t min . —R- ' - _.•Q.ned And -'2 c 0 rn rn 'c u C R t9 ; CL : E g a- v� d N C w 0: m 2 r AY WS t,„J•" S A w Hirt = t ✓„ 1�+1 U11T • 5 a.l ww rhl I -, .HNV ' N S AY r - -• SAY Tuts! = 1 y: 4 RAN 3 . -• ,n , „,r, 4 [ I :, sir ... «,S.' ! 1r ,11R lily aim a,,� 4" SiAT Clat - 1S 'r O47'9 s `id` - •• s AY }:: mitt • x.. AY S.. lr' a Hid Iu; Y HLi •/, S Ay Hlr 4 �fML S AY 1149 rr ..Y , 111.0 _11 , r Al .11 t . t AI a...14 4S ., 4' '... Q C w fA o ? W cfl � 0) .N To w w 3 C U O Q x- 2 00 c:n C tC N • Ec�� =no 0. 0 2 �\ N m N 1/) N a aa C o U W Z F w� CC G. Q N w 0 z W r 8 qq 0 0 N • Scale in Feet Schematic Only - Not to Scale Not a Construction Drawing Existing Ground Surface (Steeper than 5H:1V) Approx 15 ft (Typ) Compacted FilI. Approx aft (Typ) 2' I I � o \�cf Min.. \."i 4 . 10' Min. of Keyway Subdrain Of Required) See Detail Below Undisturbed 4i� Native Soil Excavate Series of Benches into Firm Natural Soil or Rock Below Surface Topsoil Typical Section - Keyway Construction • 2' Min. 1' pi e , p°, ° ° ° • 3/4" to 1.1/2" Clean Grave) 0 c ° oa or Crushed Rock oQ, ° -• e.[7 eo ni 4 2' ►1 6" PMP Graded to Drain to Gravity Outlet Keyway Subdrain Detail AGI TECHNOLOGIES 215001bd,cdr Typical Slope Keying & Benching Detail HBR Enterprises/Bergstrom Plat Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO DRAWN DATE APPROVED 16,215.001 CEC 28 May 98 �w FIGURE . REVISED DATE """'"—' t—� I 1 0 SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING 30' MIN, A' 7 t• ITYP.I BLOCK UNIT WITH SHEAR PIN PER MANUFACTURER FINISHED GRADE GEO•GRID REINFORCEMENT PER RETAINING, WALL DESIGN CALCULATIONS /s• kr 5' MIN. DIA PERFORATED ADS DRAIN 5/8- MINUS LEVELING PAO ICONT443'Wa6'TI 5 AoOroasmale Scala in Feat AGI TECHNOLOGIES 215001aw.aw9 LEXCAVATION LIMITS OR EXISTING SLOPE 1•1/2' MINUS SPREAD FOOTING ICONTa6'Wa18'TI REAR CHIMNEY • 12'' MIN. Typical Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall HBR Enterprlses/Bergstrom Plat GeotechnicaI investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE .. APPROVED .. REVISED DATE — 16,215.001 ALW 28 May 98 UN./ FIGURE 4 SCHEMATIC ONLY • NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Floor slab Vapor barrier Slope to drain 2 -inch min. 12 -inch min. 4 -inch 4 -inch min. diameter max. l--1 •: ;i .0 LEGEND Surface Seal; native soil or other low - permeability material Gravel Backfill for walls; WSDOT Standard Specifications, Section 9. 03.12(2), or Fine Aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete, Section 9. 03.1(2). Capillary break; free - draining sand and gravel with less than 5% fines. Drain Pipe; perforated or slotted PVC or other rigid pipe laid with perforations or slots facing down, tight jointed, with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible, corrugated plastic pipe. Tightline to positive, permanent discharge. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines AGI TECHNOLOGIES FtSubOr.cdr Typical Footing Subdrain HEIR Enterprises /Bergstrom Plat Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT HO. DRAWN GATE APPROVED REVISED DATE 18,215.001 ALW 28 May 98 1GAw FIGURE 5 SCHEMATIC ONLY • NOT TO SCALE NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING Non•Roadway Areas Floor Slab or Roadway Areas Backfiil Bedding LEGEND Asphalt/Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab 7 Base Material /Capillary Break Backfiil with Structural Fill Bedding material; material type depends on type of p0' pipe and laying conditions, Bedding should conform to the manufacturer's recommendations for the type . of pipe selected. 90 Minimum percentage of maximum laboratory dry density as determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557 -91 (Modified Proctor). AGI TECHNOLOGIES Typical Utility Trench HBR Enterprises /Bergstrom Plat Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. DRAM DATE APPROVED utiltren.cdr 16,215.001 ALW 28 May 98 ?ANN FIcuRE 6 REVISED OATE- APPENDIX A Field Exploration We explored subsurface conditions at the site on May 19, 1998 by excavating four test pits to depths of between 4.8 to 6.4 feet below the existing site grade at the approximate locations indicated on FIgure 2. The excavations were completed using a Ford 555E rubber tired backhoe. Disturbed soil samples were obtained by collecting grab samples from the excavator bucket The test pit locations were measured in the field by taping from existing building corners and property boundaries. Test pit elevations were estimated based on the site plan you supplied us and we assume that these elevations are relative to feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The locations and elevations should only be considered accurate to the degree implied by the location method used. The test pit excavations were monitored by our geotechnical engineer who laid out the test pit locations, examined and classified the materials encountered, obtained representative soil samples, and recorded pertinent information including soil sample depths, stratigraphy, soil engineering characteristics, and groundwater occurrence. Groundwater levels where recorded and are those existing at the time excavation was completed. Representative soil samples were obtained and were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (see Plate Al). All samples were sealed to limit moisture loss, labeled, and returned to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The test pit logs, modified to reflect the results of laboratory examination and testing, are presented on Plates A2 and A3. The stratification lines, shown on the logs, represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; actual transitions may be either more gradual or more severe. The conditions depicted are for the date and location indicated only, and it should not necessarily be expected that they are representative of conditions at other locations and times. AGI TECHNOLOGIES PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE APPROVED REVISED soilcleg.cdr 16,215.001 • PJS • 26 May 98 Kq• Soil Classification /Legend HBR Enterprises /Bergstrom Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PLATE Al DATE �� UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS TYPICAL NAMES > Jin o N d G z ZNo. Q m 0 ° N UJ `- L O U o ,t GRAVELS More Than half coarse fraction is larger than 4 sieve size Clean gravels with little or no fines GW °,a0, 11:.•n:i Well graded gravels. gravel -sand mixtures •GP .! • , Poorly graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures Gravels with over 12% fines GM _-tz. _ Z Silty Gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand -silt mixtures GC ,� , ;, Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-clay mixtures • - SANDS More than halt coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size Clean sands with little or no fines SW ;• Well graded sands, gravelly sands Sp Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands Sands over 12% lines SM .= ^•*: •with -',"'` Silty sand, poorly graded sand -silt mixtures Clayey sands, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures to _ tfi O f0 (11 U) E al W` o z r0 N c re 5) Z re 0 • m Z o ti SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 ML -- . Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands, or clayey silts with slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays OL Organic clays and organic silty clays of low plasticity SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit greater lhan 50 Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomacious fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays OH Organic clays of medium 10 high plasticity, organic sills HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils SAMPLE • • "Undisturbed" 0 Bulk/Grab fD Not Recovered O Recovered, Not Retained . CONTACT BETWEEN UNITS PHYSICAL PROPERTY TESTS Consol - Consolidation . LL - Liquid Limit PL - Plastic Limit Gs SA - Size An Gravity SA Size Analysis TxS - Triaxial Shear TxP Triaxial Permeability Perm - Permeability osit Po • Porosity MC • Moisture Content MD • Moisture /Density DS - Direct Shear VS • Vane Shear Comp • Compaction UU • Unconsolidated, Undrained CU - Consolidated, Undrained CD - Consolidated, Drained Well Defined Change . — Gradational Change - - " - Obscure Change �� End of Exploration BLOWS PER FOOT Hammer 1s 140 pounds with 30 -inch drop, unless otherwise noted S • SPT Sampler (2.0 -Inch O.D.) T - Thin Wall Sampler 2.8 -Inch Sample) p ( P ) H - Split Barrel Sampler (2.4 -Inch Sample) MOISTURE DESCRIPTION Dry - Considerably less than optimum for compaction Moist - Near optimum moisture content • Wet - Over optimum moisture content Saturated - Below water table, in capillary zone, or in perched groundwater AGI TECHNOLOGIES PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE APPROVED REVISED soilcleg.cdr 16,215.001 • PJS • 26 May 98 Kq• Soil Classification /Legend HBR Enterprises /Bergstrom Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PLATE Al DATE �� g' x m Test Pit Number TP1 Land Surface 220 feet Date 5/19/98 Elevation v 6 34 x eCJ o ui MC 15.6 MC 15.2 MA 29.4 16.4 MC 17.2 MC 11.6 1111011 6 - 7 inches Topsoil. GRAY AND BROWN - YELLOW SILTY SAND (SM) dense, moist; fine to coarse grained, with some fine to coarse gravel and cobbles to 12- inch diameter (Weathered Glacial Till). Becomes wet and without cobbles from 3.5' to 4.0' bgs. Test pit terminated at 4.8' bgs. No groundwater encountered during excavation. Test Pit Number TP2 Land Surface 204 feet : Date 5/19/98 Elevation 7— 8— 6 inches Topsoil. BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) loose to medium dense, moist; fine to coarse grained, with some fine to coarse subrounded gravel and roots, occasional boulder to 24 inch diameter (Weathered Glacial Till). Becomes gray and reddish, dense to very dense, without roots, and partially cemented at 2.4 feet bgs (Glacial Till). BROWN SAND (SW) very dense, moist; with some fine to coarse gravel and silt, cobbles to 6 inch diameter, and with trace silt. Test pit terminated at 6.4' bgs. No groundwater encountered during excavation. AGI TECHNOLOGIES 6215001tp.cdr Test Pit Logs HBR Enterprises /Bergstrom Geotechnical investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO DRAWN DATE , APPROVED 16,215.001 PJS 26 May 98 :406va REVISED PLATE A2 DATE m • m • N �m 5 a o° A r• >< � o u) 0 MC 9.1 MC 32.8 MC. 5.6 Test Pit Number TP3 Land Surface 188 feet Date 5/19/98 Elevation 6 - 8 inches Topsoil. REDDISH BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) loose to medium dense, dry to moist: fine to medium grained, with some fine to coarse gravel and roots (Weathered Glacial Till). GRAY AND BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) dense to very dense, moist; fine to coarse grained, with some fine to coarse gravel and trace cobbles to 6 inch diameter and trace roots (Glacial 1111). Without roots at 3.5' bgs. Quartz boulder approximately 12 inches in diameter encountered at 5.0' bgs (highly weathered). Test pit terminated at 5.8' bgs. No groundwater encountered during excavation, Test Pit Number TP4 Land Surface 187 feet Date 5/19/98 Elevation 10 = 12 inches Topsoil. BROWN SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense, dry to moist; fine grained, with some medium to coarse grained sand, fine to coarse gravel and roots, weakly cemented (Weathered Glacial Till). GRAY AND RED -BROWN SANDY SILT (ML) stiff, moist; fine grained sand, with trace roots (slightly blocky). Without roots at 3.5' bgs. BROWN SAND (SP) dense, moist (Advance Outwash). Test pit terminated at 6.0' bgs, No groundwater encountered during excavation. AGI TECHNOLOGIES 8215001 tp.cdr Test Pit Logs HBR Enterprises /Bergstrom Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. DRAWN OATE APPROVED REVISED DATE 16,215.001 PJS 26 May 98 yGAv,J PLATE A3 APPENDIX B Laboratory Testing GENERAL We conducted laboratory tests on several representative soil samples to better determine the soil classification of the units encountered and to evaluate the material's general physical properties and engineering characteristics. A brief description of the tests performed for this study Is provided below. The results of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided at the appropriate sample depths on the individual test pit Togs. However, it is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent in -situ soil conditions. All of our recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. AGI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In general accordance with our General Conditions, the soli samples for this project will be discarded . after a period of 30 days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. SOIL CLASSIFICATION As mentioned earlier, all soil samples are visually examined in the field by our representative at the time they are obtained. They are subsequently packaged and returned to our laboratory where they are reexamined and the original description is checked and verified or modified. With the help of information obtained from the other classification tests, described below, the samples are described in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, ASTM Test Method D- 2487 -83, The resulting descriptions are provided at the appropriate sample location on the individual test pit logs and are qualitative only. The attached Soil Classification /Legend (Plate Al) provides pictorial symbols that match the written descriptions. MOISTURE CONTENT Moisture content tests were performed on several samples obtained from the test pits. The purpose of these tests is to approximately ascertain the in -place moisture content of the soil sample tested. The moisture content is determined in general accordance with the ASIM Test Method. The information obtained assists us by providing qualitative information regarding the anticipated moisture contents in material that may be used as on -site fill. The results of these tests are presented at the appropriate sample depths on the test pit logs. PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS AGI (FCNP.UIIX.ItS Limited particle size analyses were conducted on two soil samples to determine the percentage of fines (silt and day- sized particles) based on the fraction passing the 3 /4-inch mesh sieve. The information gained from this analysis helps us to qualitatively estimate the suitability of on -site soils for use as fill and the drainage characteristics of the undisturbed materiaL . The results of the test are presented on Plate B1 and at the appropriate sample depth on the test pit log. U.S. Standard Sieve Size (In.) 3 1.112 314 318 4 100% [r1 l i 1 1 1 1 1 4 i I Wi111 ■ r 11 1 1 1 1 li 1 ' ' 1 1 U.S. Standard Sieve Numbers 8 16 30 40 50 100 200 Hydrometer Analysk [ 1 1 1 1 1 i I 1 11 r 1 r i>1 1 1 90 %. 111 1 ii I i 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 11 80% 70% 31 I 1 1 11 fl1 i 1 1 1 iI 1 fi 1 ! :1 l i t l 1 1 1 1 MII .7 .10111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111 numa 1. /1nAI• w111111111u!/1111_� • 1 1 1 v f�t�ii��`J""uul1..l1,111.Ii 11 . r � 11 . 1 IIMIHNUMINIMMEUMUMMOMINIUMME 11I/1U/11111101=1/111111•i .I JIM . 11117/11/m111111M11l•11U IW 7r/r_i.�/l /At•1�1U1u/��il!! /UUI 1- 110!llA111101111111111"11111PINI!!!'l1IMIPII '1•l1 UM111 1111111111111■111!!! *U c� . 1II1�til/1IL7iUilii1lY! /����I M1111 u l /' 1111 l /!!A!/1A11MMUU ►OMIIM_IU!!i- /_1111111111!um uraummliammillUILMIIIIIMMILIIIMUUMILINIWIIIIILIIIIIIIMUINIIIIIMMIIIIIIIIIII >- IU1a111111m1.1111 �III11I111 /1 /�fh1a1111 03 1 IIIALI !la1ILl/U /s 1111f111n LLI 50% I I 1 1 i i ll� :1111 u. inisimumiwifiussimilmmumusaummuunammumanumns ItiMMuuunrimalsrimmmummumusiun umarmUMUM1111111111111•11111M1111111111•11LIMMINEMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LIJ w/�ii lYI �1 � % l�i; i. Ii *iii %1IIIN w a. II1ls /w1l�1UhIM1111 �I111a11/m�1111�11• lllfiNILir'/!!1.l1111 llaLU/1•Y \I!W!1•11111__I.11!■!111U UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIalIlIllMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIII MILIN 1111JIIMaJIIIIKJ111 ►91111111/m11MUNI M11III IUMMININIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMEM1111 11n11US�Ih1a11U1U\00011/ MO 11+711 a 11!!!71!11'! =11111 r!1•i11111111 1111!!.. u1la0 11111111 - UUU111■n /sUUt•1n1711 UIIU!US?''111/7 lrIRSIIC>• /MlI11/1•!•I/!!/11U 111111111111•11MW1111111111111111MINUIM111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111111111111 ONIIII11 ?! 11111/! 11111!!1!!!l!/■11111111111111101U•IIItU IMQ11> sti1U11111/�1117Iw/�AIIIUI/111/-m� 11 M111 INUMILIMIIIIMIILIMULIMMIUMMILIMMISLIK1111111111111111L111111111111111111111111111IMUMUUN UNIINIUMMUNIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIMICIIIIIIIIIIMI1111111111111111111111/11111111111011110111111111111111111 UM. 015111111 •1i1w LIMMUIwa11'11iIIIMIN1i■i 115000 11 �1U111r1�1111ul11rsl •A11m11!!Il/�IUIIumum Milmim�I1Ium1•A111150 'Uh1111/mIIIIMI101500 nillsonnwinurumenun n111l1111lrla11n11M11111111111100 1 1 30% 20% 10% 0% 100 10 1 0.1 GRAIN SIZE (mm.) 0.01 0.001 COBBLES Coarse I Fine Coarse j Medium [ Fine SILT OR CLAY GRAVEL SAND SYMBOL SOURCE CLASSIFICATION TP.2: 1.5.2.2 ft Brown Slfty SAND (SM) with some gravel: Moist W wet AGI Particle Size Analysis HBR Enterprises / Bergstrom Geotechnical Investigation Tukwila, Washington TECHNOLOGIES Project No. "" Drawn —' Date Approved Date kievised` Date 16,215.001 16215.001 CMB 05/26198 ' w (o —9 -9e PLATE B1 _ AU_ -27 -98 THU 8:18 PM Davis Consulting Group, LLC 900 Meridian Ave East #19.313 Milton, WA 98354 (253) 874-0694 Fax (253) 874 -5241 Fax Cover Sheet Date: 8/27/98 Pages: 3 To: Iviotra Hicadliaw;: Company: City of Tukwila, Fax Phone: 206-431-3665 From: Mike Davis RE: Dear Moira, Meeting Notes Enclosed you will find the above referred, please review and call me with any questions.:. Thank -you for your attention to this matter. Sincerel Mike l avis Davis Consulting group, LLC AUT -27 -98 THU 8:18 PM Meeting Notes Thursday, August 27, 1998 Regarding: Bergstrom Plat Engineering Utility drawings Review comments with city Present: Mike Davis Tom Touma Joanna Spencer Ted Freerneler Moira Bradshaw CC &R,s 1) Lot *16 will not use the tract for access, r 2) Lot #9 shall use the tract as the access, however the home shall face the culdesac V' i d .. 3) We shall install a 10' gravel driveway in the city utility casement behind lots #19, #20, -'""� .,. ;2:. ;�i f.; �t r! 11,;,. �)1;J ',ti 1'• 4) The Landscape plan shall be included as part of the Utility plan. ''' 1' 6) Joanna to check if there an any additional notes needed, 3) Lots #9 and #10 are to use and maintain the tract "A ". 5) The lots benefiting from the use of the tracts are to maintain the tracts. ' t) 10) Check with Bob Bergstrom as to the request. 7 2) Moira to check with the parks department regarding the rails on the step. 13) Bollards are required, wood bollards are acceptable. X d,' J' 1) Bollards are required (see attachment) — Moro to cheek with Fire Marshall as to type of bollard required AUG -27 -98 THU 8:19 PM Build as shown on plan C-5 5) All tracts shall be brushed concrete. The sidewalk portions of the tracts Mull be colored to create a distinction between the walking and driving sulfites'. Tom Toms dull review the drainage fbr tract "A" and add a catch basin if needed. Tracts "B" and "C" stall sheet flow to the street with a 2% slope on the driving portion of the tract, and a 2% opposite dope on the sidewalk pordon of the tracts. thus creating a "V" shaped Funnel to direct the flow to the street. 1) Tom Torun shall review the inside and outside radius's to inure compliance with the city standards. a. 1) Build as designed (no changes), 2) Build as designed (no changes). 3) Build as designed (no changes). ;1Q General: Tom Towma to revise drawing to a larger scale, and add all valves as indicated in the comments (except the additional valves for the dry tap). Replace sheet C -11 with the street light plan from William Popp. Mike Davit to deliver an additional sweet light sets of plans to the City. NO other changes on sheets C1-- C10 Drawings required for re- submittal: 6 sets (4 sets to Kelsey, and 2 sets to Joanna) Landseane Drawinu 1) Show cross section of tract "C". 2) Show apron on tract "C". 4 : tYtil AUG -13 -98 THU 11:00 AM Davis Consultin g Group, .PLC 900 Meridian Ave Fast #19 -313 Milton, WA 98354 (253) 874.0694 Fax (253) 874 -5241 Pages: To: Company: Fax Phone: From: RE: Fax Cover Sheet 8/13/98 5. Moira Bradshaw City of Tukwila 206 -431 -3665 Mike Davis Bergstrom comments P. 1 AUG -13 -98 THU 11:00 AM 08/11788 16 ;03 Ta;MIkc Davis MEMORANDUM Frae:Bob Bergstrom TO: GARY BARNETT, CITY OF TUKWILA TOM TOUMA, TOUMA ENGRS, MIKE DAVIS, DAVIS CONSULTING BILL POPP JR. POPP AND ASSOCIATES OD‘ um., 206 4331 3665 FAX 425 251 0625 FAX 1 253 874 5241 FAX 425 454 0187 FAX FROM; BOB BERGSTROM, HCW -L, SEATTLE SUBJECT: TECHNICAL REVIEW SUMMARY ON BERGSTROM PLAT IN TUKWILA DATE: AUG 10TH, 1998 Comment Summary. This Is a Preliminary Work sheet for comment and input from ail readers. Please direct your commentary to me at FAX # 206 632 0947. Plat Comments. 3. 4, wI.p'' (WI* . 6. fjA. 8. Tracts A and B are identified In the 10/23/97 Draft Covenants. Traot B comes off of 57'" Ave. So as Driveway access for Lots # 9 and # 10. Plans Sheet C1 Says only Lot it 10. Has there been a change? Will Lots # 1 and # 2 be allowed to access their properties via this drive? RES Tract C on C1 and C2 appears to be the shared driveway access for Lots a 19 & 20, There is no mention In the Draft Covenants. Who will maintain this strip? Will Lot # 21 be allowed access? What is the intent for Public Access on this Tract C? From references in City correspondence, public access is expected across this parcel. REB The unlabeled tract or easement for access to lots # 17 818 is not mentioned In the Covenants. Is this parcel only for access to lots # 17 818. Will lot # 16 be allowed access? REB Lot # 9 has a driveway indicated off of the S. 1501" Street CuI De Sac on Plans C 1 & C2, while the Covenants Indicate access off of Tract 8 and the 571" Street frontage, The Preliminary Plat shows no access for Lot # 9 off the Cul de Sac. Hes this been changed? REB The existing Utility easement behind Lots 1119 and # 20 need a permanent all weather access easement road to the CB's behind the SW corner of lot # 20. Please provide an access road section, Driveway cut and Access control off of So, 1501^ Street. Provide a Drainage system to insure no surface drainage runs off the easement area to other properties and does not sheet or surface Bow across a sidewalk Since this Is a City access easement only, there should be indicated that Lot # 20 has no access or utility rights to use this easement unless this the Developers intent REB The Plan Set needs to include the Landscaping Plans. REB GA:- An approval signature Block should be provided for City staff sign off. REB. Additional General Notes may be required. REB C•1 Site & Topo & Boundaryy 1. The Tracts A, 8, C Ned Clear labeling. REB 0;'�- 2. ni !l; L. 3, 4, 604, etl ?'1'. • 1/ 46(14% 5. The Utility Easement behind Lots # 19 & 20 need to be shown and labeled. See notes In # 5 above. RES The access and utility easement for Lot 1 17, & 18 need to be shown and labeled. REB Accees and maintenance responsibility assignments for Tracts A, 9, C and the Lot 17/18 Easement need to be shown, as wail as who gets to use the Tracts/ Easements, REB If Public access or use is allowed In Tracts A,B,C, this should be indicated on Sheet C1. REB ` '' / 1 !j a7, g f i0. ...... P. 2 Go?" kt-519 ds! lil i-I11 j))'L.. 4CC- AUG -13 -98 THU 11:01 AM 00/11/90 16:03 To:Mlke Davis 6. 10, (7� 5, 7. 9, 12. 13: Fros:00 tiergscrom The Revised Traffic Control signs on the So. 150"' Place Cul De Sec Should be shown. The Developer shall remove and retum to the City the existing Type 3 Barricade where the new Tract C 14 4 foot drive will extend. The remaining segment of Type 3 Barricade shall be reinstalled to remain at the end of Lot # 21. Install End of Street marker MUTCD 3C1.4 ;- insta;lNo Parking -Signs on-existing-turnaround-on So. 150' PL on.woast and east side otstreet, (4 signs needed), Bollards as specified on Sheet C1. REB, Nick is On Street Parking allowed on both sides of the street in Tukwila on a 28' wide road? If not , No Parking Signs should be required to control on street parking. No perking signs should be required on the Cul De Sac. RE8 Has the Plat been reviewed by the Poet Master? Will Cluster mail Boxes be required or will Horne Mall delivery be provided by the Post Office? If Cluster Boxes are required, show locations on Street Plans and coordinate with Street Tree plantings Lighting and street signage. REB Pedestrian path directions signage required, ' Walk way to 57'" Ave. S. open Dawn to Dusk' and Walk way to S0. 15tr Street Open to public Dawn to Dusk'. Sign mounting height, 3 to 4 feet. M. Bergstrom to Mora Bradshaw ( Sept. 22nd 97 letter), REB Comments, 1 recommend that all trail signage be review by the City Perks Department. Spilt rail fencing to be installed on So 57th Ave Frontage, on Tract B and Tract A property Tines. On OTEK Plans and per M. Bergstrom to Mora Bradshaw ( Oct. 18°97 letter) For Lot # 21 , add Curb and Gutter along existing street frontage on So. 1501" PL Street Frontage on Cul de Sac. REB N,veved $104.5 f z. 'd roe. / a1il The Trail Improvements on Tract A needs a profile, pavement section, & drainage containment so run off doesn't go over the sidewalk In sheet flow. REB ; ' ,,,, The Trail Stairs need details with Railings detailed. REB JH G lt� ut)mi�'' Lot # 9 Driveway. Why is'it shovn off of So, 150'" Street The Covenants indicate access of 57" Ave. REB /2()14101C: General comment on Private Drainage. Many communitles require Individual storm drainage stub outs to each lot from the Public Storm Sewer. This Plat has no such storm connections. What is the City direction on this? I recommend that alt lots have access to a public storm drain, or on site Infiltration system specified. With this Plat underlying soil conditions, infiltration will not be very effective. REB The new Street Profiia on So. 150'x' doesn't match the finished contour lines on C2. REB Tract C needs a drainage design to insure that storm water doesn't sheet flow over the sidewalk. RES Tract 8 needs a drainage design to insure that storm water doesn't sheet now over the new trail In Tract A and not over the new sidewalk at the end of the So. 150'" Cul de Sac. REB Will the New So. 150" Street Sidewalks directly tie to the existing walk in the older plat to the west. Will there be a gap or unimproved walk area between the two projects? REB What are the New Curb angle points in the transition to match the existing street improvements in SO. 150th Street to the west, What Is the existing So. 150" Street improvement width? REB The Tract C pavement seems to expand beyond the area indicated as Tract C In the legal exhibits for the Tract C boundaries. Why does these not match? REB Provide Traffic controlislgnage detail for the Tract C and So 150th Place Cul de Sac Connection. REB ?CA Show existing Street Center line grades in existing Plat to west on So. 150" Street to Insure that the new street centerline will have a smooth connection an not a severe vertical grade break ( Center line grades back 150 feet should be shown.) REB Extend storm drains and add 2 new CB's at ease end of the new Cul De Sac on So. 150" Street. JH P, 3 2 �U mLit'��, AUG -13-98 THU 11:02 AM B8 /11198 16:83 TetMlke Davis G -4 1. Bollard Detail. The existing City Standard Bollards are too heavy and not resistant to weather. A new Bollard design is needed. Fire Marshall (1/8198). RES response; An aluminum Bollard should be considered. A new standard detail will be required, 2. - On new Oil Water Separator, replace the specified 42" Round Ring and Cover lid with a Square Silco Hatch. JH 3. Delete Side Walk Section showing a Planter strip between the Walk and Curb and replace with integral Curb and Walk Section. JH, REB Comment: The Approved Plat sent to City Council has a planter strip/ walk section. This change would require Council Fromagoo nergs%i•uu Add Bollards at So 150" Street and New Tract A sidewalk. JH. REB Comments. I recommend that no Bollards are needed here. The Tract A walk soon has a Stair segment Just to the sent, and the walk is well separated by a planter strip. P. 4 co 11 review. C -5 5. On all Tract A, B, and C pavement surfaces, no,::. • • aggregate allowed. Add W rip t, between the walk areas and driveway sections. EB Comments, 1 recommend that the 1.1k4 Tract B and C pavements be either all Portia • = ment concrete pavements, or all asphaltic pavements, t do not recommend combining surfaces with different matenals. In no case V should any lips or curbing be constructed. I am worried about differential settlement at the edge between different surfaces, and the possibility of tripping for Seniors, or Children on the transition edge. Likewise / do not recommend exposed aggregate PCC surfaces for any public walks, This material is too slippery in Pacific Norwest winters, The Path areas and driveway areas can be delineated on PCC surfaces simply by scribing different' Dummy Joint patterns. The path areas and driveway areas can be delineated on Asphaltic surfaces by traffic lines and paint or thermoplastic lines. C-6 1. ,iiii40/1 C. yL �r So. 150" Street Cul De Sac Center Planter, Maximum allowed width is 20 feet, planter as 1 `i` BTU �c) shown exceeds City Standard. JH � WO. ;' ISN IDjii.I LPLi )1.12 . 5d iv() ai. ')G'Si }(„ 4V1 f J t JII)77t pYrl-yi'3;9t3 c-a Sanitary Sewer ' 1K'r'-tl 14r.' -Yl`NS ,i 5c-2e /i6J 1. Sanitary pipe Tina grades to steep. Reduce grades, and add Drop manholes JH REB t/J Comments. i recommend that the sanitary sewer be constructed as designed. l have not experienced problems with moderately steep sanitary sewers. 2. Add outside Drops on new MH's JH. REB Comments. I recommend that the sanitary sewer be constructed as designed. I have not experienced problems with moderately steep sanitary sewers. 3. Add new Manhole on side sewer run to Lot # 10. JH. REB comment; The proposed Lot # 10 side sewer is 111 feet long and has a good grade si 10 %. The side sewer also ties directly to the new a Manhole In the Cu/ de sac. I recommend that the Side sewer use a Clean out located as currently show. The Clean out shall be extended to the surface, have a "'Burke Plug" at the open end and Provide a Cast iron Ring and Cover on the surface with a small concrete ring pad to support the Ring and Cover. Make sure the CO Wye faces up hill for up hill ( dding. C•10 Water Plan 1. Move Water Services for Lots # 1 & 2 from ex. 57" Ave WM to the new WM In Tract B. Tie new Lot 1 & 2 Water Services to the new main. PS 2. Add 2 new GVatIP Tee atSte, 11 +21. PB 3. Add 2 GV's at 8" Tee at Sta. 14+08, on run up Trail Easement on Tract A.JH 3 AUG -13 -98 THU 11:02 AM 81 /11/90 1603 TosMIke Davis 0 is Promos stergstzrom 4. On 571" Ave WM tie in, if Dry Cut In Tee, Provide 2- GY'e on the existing N to S pipe run in 57 Ave WM. JH 5. Do not locate new WM in Trail Tract A under new concrete Steps. DC 6. On South 1501" Pi. WM Tie in, Add new GV on new WM run up the Tract C -1)-1/DC 7, At South 150'" Street Sta. 10+ 16, provide new 8" GV at Tie In/ Take of JHIDC C -11 Street Lighting Genersi comments on the Street Lighting Pion. The attached plan appears to be Incomplete, While the Plan Is dated May 1998, many required items needed for construction are missing. 1. Street Luminaire wattage oaliout missing. REB 2. Pole heights not specified. City specified u 30 foot mounting height REB 3. Poles shown as aluminum, City Standard for residential is concrete. REB 4, Pole Arms shown as Truss Arm, City Standard residential arms specified es Davit arms. REB 5. The new Lighting system is noted to connect to the existing wiring and Contactor Cabinet in the existing plat system to the West. Is thls existing lighting system suitable to per the new lamps? REB Thank You Bob Bergstrom HCW -L Engineers 4010 Stone Way North Seattle WA. 98103 Tel.: 206 632 2664 toll;free 800 562.7707 e-mail: Kb govulilnccwl.ccsm PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: August 27, 1998 PROJECT NAME: Bergstrom Short Plat PERMIT NO.: MI98 -0099 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179 if you have any questions regarding the following comments: 1. Revise plans per the 8/27/98 meeting with Public Works staff. 2. Specify estimated yardage of both cut and fill on your grading plan and reference the geotech/soil report (name of geotech consultant, phone number, title and dates of the report). 3. Landscape plans and street lighting plans shall be made part of your next plan submittal, 09/03/98 14:21 To:Gary Barnett From :Bab Bergstrom C 206 -632 -0947 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE Date: 9/3/98 Time: 14 :21:16 Pages: 3 Page 1/3 To: Gary Barnett Company: City of Tukwila FIECEIVED Fax* 431 3665 SEP 31998 From: Bob Bergstrom Company: HCWL PU C WORKS Address: 4010 Stone Way N Suite 300 Seattle , Wa 98103 Fax #: 632 -0947 Voice #: 632 -2664 Message: Gary, Please review and give me some guidance on my last several comments. 1 just got from Mike Davis, a revised set of Plans, and I made a last review. While most everything seems very good, there are four items still missing or not addressed. I have attached a DRAFT copy of my latest comments and I would like you to take a look before I distribute them. Your comments are requested. Bob Bergstrom HCW -L Engineers c Copyright Cheyenne Software, Inc. FAXSERVI3 09/03/98 14:21 To:Gary Barnett From:Bob Bergstrom MEMORANDUM TO: GARY BARNETT, CITY OF TUKWILA TOM TOUMA, TOUMA ENGRS. MIKE DAVIS, DAVIS CONSULTING BILL POPP JR. POPP AND ASSOCIATES 2.06- 632 -0947 206 4331 3665 FAX 425 251 0625 FAX 1 253 874 5241 FAX 425 454 0187 FAX FROM: BOB BERGSTROM, HCW -L, SEATTLE SUBJECT: TECHNICAL REVIEW SUMMARY ON BERGSTROM PLAT IN TUKWILA DATE: SEPT. 3rd, 1998 Comment Summary. This is the Third edition, updating the Aug 18 Memo. Please direct your commentary to me at FAX # 206 632 0947. Plat and General Comments. Received revised CC &R's dated 1/9/98. All issues resolved C -1 Site & Topo & Boundary 1. The existing Utility easement behind Lots # 19 and # 20 need a permanent all weather access easement road to the CB's behind the SW corner of lot # 20 CITY STAFF REQUEST Do you still care about this? C -2 & 3 Drainage and Road Plan Page 2/3 1. The Trail Stairs need details with Railings detailed. REB JH I recommend stairs w/ railings, and a Stair structural Detail in the Plan set. At a minimum, please reference the City of Seattle Standard Plan # 440. 2. General comment on Private Drainage. Provide individual storm drainage stub outs to each lot from the Public Storm Sewer. Provide Smooth bore ADS N -12 or PVC pipe. REB I recommend storm stubs to each lot. 3. The Tract C pavement seems to expand beyond the area indicated as Tract C in the legal exhibits for the Tract C boundaries. REB Does the City care about this apparent inconsistency? C -4 Storm and Road Details All issues resolved C -5 Tract Cross Sections and Notes All issues resolved C -6 & 7 TESCP All issues resolved C -8 & 9 Sanitary Sewer All issues resolved C -10 & 11 Water Plan All issues resolved Street Lighting All issues resolved Separate Popp and Associates Submittal L1 & 2 Landscaping Plan All issues resolved Touma and Blue Sky Submittal Thank You Bob Bergstrom HCW -L Engineers 4010 Stone Way North Seattle WA. 98103 Tel.: 206 632 2664 toll free 800 562 -7707 e -mail: Rbergstrolli@hcwl.com 1 Translating Comprehensive Plan Policies Into Transit- /U- 07, 4/61_67,4111.1 a 1.1•41gwo.ri Ar CO ar_4207Z-Zd //as} acAas a_ 746a2_39, noots46 gyz/.4//L. egseonvit, 1121TM,"AttfiliNfia 60211SM.FH4 AUG -25 -98 TUE 6:07 AM Davis Consulting Group, LLC 900 Meridian Ave Bast #19 -313 Milton, WA 98354 (253) 874 -0694 Fax (253) 874 -5241 Fax Cover Sheet Date: 8/25/98 Pages: 7 To: Kelsey (permit coordinator) Company: City of Tukwila Fax Phone: 206 -431 -3665 From: Mike Davis RE: Dear Kelsey, Updated comments (correction list ?) Enclosed you will find the above referred, please review and call me with any questions. Bob Bergstrom from HCW -L is requesting our engineer Toni Touma to make the enclosed corrections. However Gary Barnett said that the correction list is to come from you. Furthermore, you have said that you have not received any comments from Gary or Bob. HELP ! I spoke with Moira, she will sign off on the tree permit, and the hopefully the utility permit after receiving and reviewing the updated utility comments from Bob Bergstrom. Thank -you for your attention to this matter. If you should have any questions please call me at the number listed above. Sincerely s Davi onsulting group, LLC P. 1 AUG-25-98 TUE 6:08 AM r HAMMOND, COLLIER & WADE • LIVINGSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC. c ONSULTING ENGINEERS 4010 STONai WAY NORTH. SUITS 300 SCAMS, WASHINGTON 15103 TELEPHONE; (208) G32-2684 FAX; (204) 632 -0347 TO V L s �ilwS ✓ l� j9— 3/_3 l7L G -'09 9g$4.-/ WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Shop drawings C Copy of letter P. 2 LITTER OF TRANSMMAIL DATE e /i g 1 8 ATTENTI" 1 /mil oyes a/kocal .ies rro. RGI lIr tached ❑ Under separate cover via 0 Prints 0 Plane ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Change order ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below; or review Of your USG ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment O No exceptions taken O Exceptions as noted p Returned for corrections Resubmit 0 Submit_ ❑ Return copies for review ,copies for distribution corrected prints COPY TO n i AUG -25 -98 TUE 6:08 AM • MEMORANDUM TO: GARY BARNETT, CITY OF TUKWILA TOM TOUMA, TOUMA ENGRS. MIKE DAVIS, DAVIS CONSULTING BILL POPP JR. POPP AND ASSOCIATES 208 43j1 3666 FAX 425 251 0625 FAX 1 253 874 5241 FAX . 425 454 0187 FAX v/ FROM: BOB BERGSTROM, HCW -L, SEATTLE SUBJECT: TECHNICAL REVIEW SUMMARY ON BERGSTROM PLAT IN TUKWILA DATE; AUG 18TM, 1998 Comment Summary. This Is a Second edition, updating the Aug 10 Memo. Please direct your commentary to me at FAX # 206 632 0947. Plat end General Comments. Received revised CC &R's dated 1/9/98. 1. The unlabeled tract or easement for access to lots 017 & 18 is not mentioned in the Covenants. Is this parcel only for access to lots # 17 & 18. Will lot # 16 be allowed access? REB 2. Lot # 9 has a driveway indicated off of the S. 150th Street Cul De Sac on Plans C 1 & C2, while the Covenants Indicate access off of Tract B and the 57Q' Street frontage. The Preliminary Plat shows no access for Lot# 9 off the Cul de Sac. Recommend deleting this driveway. REB 3. The existing Utility easement behind Lots # 19 and # 20 need a permanent all weather access easement road to the CB's behind the SW corner of lot # 20. Please provide an access road section, Driveway cut and Access control off of So. 150" Street. Provide a Drainage system to insure no surface drainage runs off the easement area to other properties and does not sheet or surface flow across a sidewalk. Since this Is a City access easement only, there should be indicated that Lot # 20 has no access or utility rights to use this easement unless this the Developers Intent. REB 4. include Landscaping Plans In construction documents. GB 5. An approval signature Block should be provided for City staff sign off. REB. 6. Additional General Notes may be required. REB C.1 Site & Topo & Boundary 1. The Tracts A, B. C Need Clear labeling. REB 2, The Utility Easement behind Lots 0 19 & 20 need to be shown and labeled. REB 3. Plans Sheet C1 Says only Lot* 10. CC &R's Indicate Lot* 9 and 010 are to use the Driveway. REB 4. The access and utility easement for Lot# 17, & 18 needs to be shown and labeled. REB 5. Access and maintenance responsibility assignments for Tracts A, 8, C and the Lot 17/18 Easement need to be declared on Sheet C1, as well as who gets to use the Tracts/ Easements. REB 6. Public access or use allowed in Tracts A,B,C, should be indicated on Sheet C1. REB 7. The Revised Traffic Control signs on the So, 160th Place Cul De Sac Should be shown. The Developer shall remove and return to the City the existing Type 3 Barricade where the new Tract C 14 4 foot drive will extend. The remaining segment of Typo 3 Barricade shell be reinstalled to remain at the end of Lot* 21. install End of Street marker MUTCD 3C1.4 , 1 P, 3 AU-25-98 TUE 6 :09 AM Install No Parking Signs on existing turn around on So. 1500' PL an west and east side of street, (4 signs needed). Bollards as specified on Sheet C1. REB, Nick 8. Plat has been reviewed by the Post Master. The Cluster Mall Box is required, to be located on the east end of the Traffic island in the Cul De Sac. Show location on Plan C -1 and C -2, and modify Landscaping Plans to show Cluster Box. REB 9. Note on C1 the extent of Split rail fencing to be installed on So 57°1 Ave Frontage, on Tract B and Tract A property lines. 10. For Lot # 21 , add Curb and Gutter along existing street frontage on So. 15001 PL Street Frontage on Cul de Sac. REB C -2 1. The Trail Improvements on Tract A needs a profile, pavement section, & drainage containment so run off doesn't go over the sidewalk in sheet flow. RES 2 The Trail Stairs need details with Railings detailed. The Landscaping Plan diagrams are inadequate. REB JH, REB comment; I have attached a City of Seattle Standard Detail on Stairs similar to this project A submittal like this Is needed, provide horizontal and vertical control and layout. 3. Delete Lot* 9 Driveway off of So. 150° Street REB 4. General comment on Private Drainage. Provide individual storm drainage stub outs to each lot from the Public Storm Sewer. Provide Smooth bore ADS N -12 or PVC pipe. REB 5. The new Street Profile on So, 150t doesn't match the finished contour lines on C2. REB 6. Tract C needs a drainage design to insure that storm water doesn't sheet flow over the sidewalk. REB 7. Tract B needs a drainage design to insure that storm water doesn't sheet flow over the new trail in Tract A and not over the new sidewalk at the end of the So. 150'" Cul de Sac, REB 8. What are the New Curb angle points in the transition to match the existing street improvements In SO, 150m Street to the west. What Is the existing So. 150m Street improvement width? REB 9. The Tract C pavement seems to expand beyond the area indicated as Tract C in the legal exhibits for the Tract C boundaries. Why does these not match? REB 10. Provide Traffic controllsignage dotal, for the Tract C and So 1500 Place Cul de Sac Connection, REB 11, Show existing Street Center line grades In existing Plat to west on So. 1500, Street to Insure that the new street centerline will have a smooth eonnectlon an not a severe vertical grade break. ( Center line grades back 150 feet should be shown.) REB 12. Extend storm drains and add 2 new CB's at east end of the new Cul De Sac on So. 16007 Street JH 13, Add Bollards at So 150"' Street and New tract A sidewalk. JH. REB Comments. I recommend that no Bollards are needed here. The Tract A walk soon has a Stair segment Just to the east, and the walk is well separated by a planter strip. C-4 1. Bollard Detail, The existing City Standard Bollards are too heavy and not resistant to weather. A new Bollard design is needed. Fire Marshall ( 1/8/98). REB response: An aluminum Bollard should be considered. A new standard detail will be required, which is not the responsibility of the Plat Design Engineer. 2, On new Oil Water Separator, replace the specified 42" Round Ring and Cover Dd with a Square Bilco Hatch. JH 3. Delete Side Walk Section showing a Planter strip between the Walk and Curb and replace with integral Curb and Walk Section. JH. REB Comment The Approved Plat sent to City Council has a planter strip/ walk section. This change would require Council review. 2 P. 4 AUG -25 -98 TUE 6:09 AM C-5 5. On all Tract A, B, and C pavement surfaces, no exposed aggregate allowed. Add W lip between the walk areas and driveway sections. JH. REB Comments; I recommend that the Tract B and C pavements be either all Portland cement concrete pavements, or all asphaltic pavements, I do not recommend combining surfaces with different materials. In no case should any lips or curbing be constructed. I am worried about differential settlement at the edge between different surfaces, and the possibility of tripping for Seniors, or Children an the transition edge. Likewise / do not recommend exposed aggregate PCC surfaces for any public walks, this material is too slippery In Pacific Norwest winters. The Path areas and driveway areas can be delineated on PCC surfaces simply by scribing different Dummy' Joint patterns. The path areas and driveway areas can be delineated on Asphaltic surfaces by traffic lines and paint or thermoplastic lines. An Inverted v pavement section is a design option to control drainage within the driveway section. C-6 1, So. 150x' Street Cul De Sac Center Planter, Maximum allowed width is 20 feet, planter as shown exceeds City Standard. JH REB comment: 1 recommend accepting the Planter as designed. C -8 Sanitary Sewer 1. Sanitary pipe line grades too steep, Reduce grades, and add Drop manholes JH REB Comments. I recommend that the sanitary sewer be constructed as designed 1 have not experienced problems with moderately steep sanitary sewers. 2. Add outside Drops on new MH's JH. REB Comments. I recommend that the sanitary sower be constructed as designed. I have not experienced problems with moderately steep sanitary sewers. 3. Add new Manhole on side sewer run to Lot *10. JH, REB comment; The proposed Lot # 10 side sewer Is 111 feet long and has a good grade > 10 %. The side sewer also ties directly to the new a Manhole in the Cul de sec.1 recommend that the Side sower use a Clean out located as currently show, The Clean out shall be extended to the surface, have a `Burke Plug" at the open end and provide a Cast Iron Ring and Cover on the surface with a small concrete ring pad to support the Ring and Cover. Make sun the CO Wye faces up hill for up hill rodding. C -10 Water Plan 1. Move Water Services for Lots # 1 & 2 from ex. 57°i Ave WM to the new WM in Tract B. Tie new Lot 1 & 2 Water Services to the new main. P6 2. Add 2 new GV at 8° Tee et Sta. 11 +21. PB 3, Add 2 GV's at 80 Tee at Sta. 14+08, on run up Trail Easement an Tract A.JH 4. On 57'" Ave WM tie in, if Dry Cut in Tee, Provide 2- GV's on the existing N to S pipe run In 57 Ave WM. JH 5. Do not locate new WM in Trail Tract A under new concrete Steps. DC 6. On South 1500 PI. WM Tie in, Add new GV on new WM run up the Tract C JH/DC 7. At South 150° Strut Sta. 10+ 16, provide new 8° GV at Tie in/ Take off. JH/DC REB comment: I recommend that the water plan Sheet C10 b. modified. The existing plan only has one Valve. The revisions will add 8 valves: at 57"' Street connection - 2 GV's , at 14+08 - 1 GV on WM branch up trail, at Sta. 10 +16 - 1 GV at WM connection point, and at Sta, 11+26 - 2 GV's on east and south side of new Tee. • HAUG -25 -98 TUE 6:10 AM C -11 Strut Lighting Received Popp and Assoc. Lighting Plan, hand delivered.,. Lighting Plan masts all criteria, and Is compatible with the Landscaping Plan. I recommend approval. REB Thank You Bob Bergstrom HCW -L Engineers 4010 Stone Way North Seattle WA. si8103 Tel.: 206 632 2664 toll free 800 562 -7707 e -mail: Rbrrestrom(bcwi.com AUG -25 -98 TUE 6:11 AM P. 7 Standard Plan No.440 ti Ref. sta. Spec. Sec. 6-16 Po Not Seals AMMO WM& OR PuktC WOWS • /3, �x �°�0��; — _ CITY OF MIME MAN Arrsm wx *MAN OCPARNINT OF I;NOINIEI INO Cement Concrete Stairway and Handrail • • Memorandum DATE: August 13, 1998 TO: Gary Barnett FROM: Moira Bradshaw RE: MI98 -0099 The following are my comments regarding the above permit. Sheet C -4 The residential driveway detail should show a 5 foot planter width instead of the 4 feet. Two bollards should be placed at the western end of Tract A. The bollards at either end of Tract A should be engraved with "Tukwila" and "15" in a circle. (See the copy of a photo showing the type face, size and location for letters and numbers.) On the bollard detail a 6 inch collar at the base would provide a maintenance mow strip. This sheet should indicate the construction details i.e. subbase for Tract A, B, and C. The vertical transition from Tract C to the end of S. 150 Place is not clear and should be shown in detail. Sheet C -11 Can the illumination poles be positioned such that the easternmost pole is closer to the west end of Tract A? Sheet C -2 All plans show a 15 and 5 foot wide driveway and sidewalk respectively for Tract C. yet the description on C -5 indicates that the total width varies from 20 - 28 feet. This needs to be clarified and shown on this drawing. In addition, driveway access to Lot 21 would be improved by having it off Tract C. The following signage issues are necessitated by Tract C as it is currently shown: "No Parking" signs in front of the adjacent house on S. 150 Place. Existing barricades (except one) and signs should be salvaged to City Maintenance (433- 1862) Install end of road markers(See MUTCD, Sections 3C1 -4) See Attachment from City Engineer 1/6/98 5Jaud ire6(0 ?c efiS'/ /.its Edlivv 7 I e 11 t' , L _ .. a 41 il/h Ni ii r. Are "t C;4 The parcel providing access to Lots 18 and 17 should be labeled as Tract D. Who will be responsible for building the driveway? Sheet C -5 Tract B should have 2.5 feet of all weather surface (crushed compact gravel ?) on either side of the paved surfaces in order to achieve a total width of 20 feet. The Detail sheet, GN1 from the tree permit application, should be combined with C -5 and . included in the utility set because it shows construction details for Tract A. I have concerns about the Fire Department's comment on the cul -de -sac. The City Council has approved the subdivision layout as it is shown and the road width exceeds the TMC standard of a minimum of 20 feet. If there is a turning radius issue then it should be identified as such and resolved accordingly. Attachment: Trail bollard photo City Engineer Road Signage Notes. cc: File Mike Davis /=97 FRI 09:56 AM MICHAEL BERGSTROM 1 0 • • • • 5' sjw l 7.o' 118.S° 1.S' ■ . 1 • • i• r 0 2062818244 S4I4146.: ICJ= /0'. o ,�.rr�c Cx,si rr /'6 .3 8 pctENT To et,e05r,ofrt Pk ved. -o r-E4 • 3,g4,✓404 7 Gir` / 1Ai,4/TeN J' (4' --/k62) wsf'aGG £t/" Dn gpA41) /tAfe r- Ke-' 5eG4 /94 $ Se l- g 04a Lev rx' elAn- Cxi- r Tr, b 3 B, inceu -j pfrreC/T •i i / is tEi r Posf"s w fn a • col iletiA 1 /4*- pat; Xr yos of dr; P1111 sur/ *i e ) S/ loeoTjod A/'oA• 4,A pe /1)6wA-Y- S. 15Ot1st pl. 1 431 g-a- V • • • • • • • /A/7,1 Voiis 16114trif'1-14- -fire iZa�• —L 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: August 27, 1998 PROJECT NAME: Bergstrom Short Plat PERMIT NO.: MI98 -0099 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179. if you have any questions regarding the following comments: 1. Revise plans per the 8/27/98 meeting with Public Works staff. 2. Specify estimated yardage of both cut and fill on your grading plan and reference the geotech/soil report (name of geotech consultant, phone number, title and dates of the report) . . Landscape plans and street lighting plans shall be made part of your next plan submittal.