Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit MI98-0162 - CSM HOTEL - DETENTION VAULT
CSM HOTEL DETENTION VAULT MI98-0162 City of Tukwila (206) 431 -3670 Community Development / Public Works • 6300 Southcentiter Boulevard, Suite 100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT WARNING: IF CONSTRICTION BEGINS BEFORE APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRES, APPLICANT IS PROCEEDING AT THEIR OWN RISK. Parcel No: 000580 -0005 Address: ]6038 WEST VALLEY HY Suite No: Location: Category: OTHR Type: MISCPERM Zoning: TUC Const Type: Gas /Elec.: Units: 000 Setbacks: North: Water: UNKNOWN Wetlands: .0 South: Sewer: Slopes: Contractor License No: KIEWICC179C5 OCCUPANT OWNER CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR Permit No: Status: Issued: Expires: MI98 -0162 ISSUED 12/23/1998 06/21/1999 Occupancy: UBC: Fire Protection: N/A .0 East: .0 West: CSM HOTEL - DETENTION VAULT 16038 WEST VALLEY HY, TUKWILA WA 98188 NELSEN HELEN B 15643 W VALLEY HYWAY, TUKWILA WA DON MILES /MILES CONSULTING 14400 BEL -RED ROAD, BELLEVUE, WA 98007 KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION CO 1000 KIEWIT PLAZA, OMAHA NE 68131 CONTACT JOSH STINSON Phone: 425 - 226 -3447 ******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *fir * * ** * * ** * * * ** * ***k** Permit Description: CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER DETENTION VAULT ***********************************.****************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *k ** Construction Valuation: $ 59,000.00 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: *(Water Meter Permits Listed Separate). Eng. Appr: JJS Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk /CSS: N Fire Loop Hydrant: N No: Size(in):: .00 Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: Land Altering: N Cut: Landscape Irrigation: N Moving Oversized Load: N Start Time: End Tine: Sanitary Side Sewer: N No: Sewer Main Extension: N Private: N Public: N Storm Drainage: Y Street Use: N Water Main Extension: N Private: N Public: N k. k*******************• k****************** * * * * * * ** * ** * *** * **** * * * *** * * ** *sir * * * * * * * * **** TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES: $ 1,070.65 ********k********************************* ***************************************k* Streams: .0 Phone: (425)747 -4421 Phone: 425- 255 -8333 End Time: Fill: Permit Center Authorized Signature: Date : /Z 05- I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign for and obtain this development pe mi Signature: Print Name: 1140t SM )E O ) Date :12ZZ-g� This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or .abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. CITY OF TT'(WILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 BYO_ .TAFF USE ONLY Miscellaneous Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mall or facsimile. Project Name/Tenant: 5:EAT"T LF CrA 1" 1 gan by 1/4IR1t Value of Construction: .G S, DOQ..nO Tax Parcel Number: - Site Address: City State /Zip: - Property Owner: C S 11 1.-.0 b ( 7 - , t SJ c ; L I-C Pho e: 6 LA 4 46 - (7 1 7 Fax #: (t 1,2) X.03 -- -7 47 ( Phorte 5 a SOS (� G44- .J Street Address: City State /Zip: 2s 776 Lb.), vAPS t-r). a.�>: Vi -rE t$�O S iii ii' "� ....ua Contact Person: pr�VE u��T�cy Street Address: City State /Zip: l +-4c�O BE ► - kc � �t >. X 2 0 , . t.J 6 1 (Z )1 7 Fax #: (A-25' 6 44�- ! (4S C ntractor: ALi DE SOti P 1 x1.2f j.) 14Ae t_Fy 4 AS t--.. i.a� -. Phone: C4Z5) 644 — 1sos Street Address: City State /Zip: ' • e • - -- , • . # • . . 1 SOO Fax #: 4-2g 44- i I ¢S --Architect: a NG l Iv i TS g D oxi ri t L6 S Phone: (4 2s) 747— 44 2 ) ,,------- Street Address: City State /Zip: ',Jot. t — - • e• i;_ W . - ' - ..p. Fax #: 125 "l ` "i!/ Engineer: Phone: Street Address: City State /Zip: Fax #: MISCELLANEOUS. PERMIT REVIEW AND' APPROVAG!IEQUESTED: (TO BE:FILLED OUT BYAPPLICANT) . Description of work to be don ©: ,.'i'U 1: f''t \NJ A-TC V A„ L_T Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? ❑ yes a no Attach list of materials and storraa o location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 per indicating puantities & Material Safet Data Sheets 71 Above Ground Tanks lJ Antennas /Satellite Dishes ■ Bulkhead/Docks Commercial Reroof ❑ Demolition ❑ Fence ❑ Mechanical ❑ Manufactured Housing - Replacement only ❑ Parking Lots ❑ Retaining Walls in Temporary Pedestrian Protection /Exit Systems ❑ Temporary Facilities ❑ Tree Cutting ;APPLICANT:REQUEST; FOR :MISCEL'LMANEOUSPUBL'IC'WORKS PERMITS:::; ❑ Channelization /Striping ❑ Flood Control Zone ❑ andscape Irrigation ILx Storm Drainage ❑ Water Meter /Exempt # ❑ Water Meter /Permanent # ❑ Water Meter Temp # in Miscellaneous ❑ Curb cut /Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: Size(s): ❑ Land Altering: 0 Cut cubic yards 0 Fill cubic yards 0 _ �sq. ft.grading /clearing ❑ Sanitary Side Sower #: ❑ Sewer Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public Size(s): Size(s): Size(s : Est. quantity' gal Schedule: DI Moving Ovaisized Load/Hauling 0 Deduct 0 Water Only MONTHLY SERVICE BILLINGS TO:' Name: Phone: Address: City /State /Zip: 0 Water 0 Sewer 0 Metro O.Standby WATER METER DEPOSIT /REFUND BILLING: Name: Phone: Address: City /State /Zip: Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days . upon written request by the applicant as defined In Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. Date application accepted: 7 Date application expires: Appllcallo ken by: (Initials) ALL MISCELLANEOUS P IT APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUB , . 4 . ,:1 ➢ ALL; DRAVVINGOAL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN ➢ BUILDING SITE PLArl1S AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED ➢ ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT ➢ STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER ➢ CIVIL/SITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER (P.E.) TED WITH THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". Butlding:Owner /Authorized Agent, If the applicant Is other.=thnnthe owner, registered architect / engineer, .or .contractor licensed: by the State of: Washington, a notarized letter from the property y; owner authorizing the agent to subm,t this' permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal... I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND 1 AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING OW:I SUBMIT APPLICATION AND REQUIRED CHECKLISTS FOR PERMIT REVIEW ❑ Above Ground Tanks/ Water Tanks - Supported'directly upon grade exceeding 5,000 gallons and a ratio of height to diJ peter or width which exceeds 2:1 Submit checklist. No M =9 in Antennas /Satellite Dishes Submit checklist No: M -1 ❑ Awnings /Canopies - No signage Commercial Tenant. Improvement Permit . ❑ Bulkhead/Dock Submit checklist No M -10.. ❑ Commercial Reroof. Submit checklist No: M -6 ❑ Demolition: Submit checklist : No M -3, M -3a ❑ Fences - Over 6 feet in Height , Submit checklist No M -9 ❑ Land Altering/Grading/Preloads. 'Submit checklist ' No: M -2 ❑ Loading Docks : Coi-nmercial Tenant Improvement . Permit.. Submit checklist No: H-17 ❑ Mechanical•(Residential & Commercial) Submit checklist - No M -8,: Residential:only H -6, H -16 Submit ‘ No H -9 ❑ Miscellaneous Public Works Permits ❑ Manufactured Housing.(RED INSIGNIA ONLY) Submit checklist . No M -5 '.. ❑ Moving Oversized Load /Hauling Submit checklist ;.No: M -5 ❑ Parking Lots Submit checklist No: M -4 in , Residential'Reroof - Exempt with following exception:`If roof structure to. be.repalred;orreplaced . Residential Building Permit Submit checklist. •No:. M=6 ❑ Retalning,Walls - Over 4 feet in height Subrriit'checkilst No . M=1 ❑ Temporary. Facilities .. :' Submit checklist No:. M -7 ❑ Temporary' Pedestrian Protection /Exit Systems Submit checklist No M-4 . ❑ Tree Cutting Submit checklist No ML2 ❑ Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". Butlding:Owner /Authorized Agent, If the applicant Is other.=thnnthe owner, registered architect / engineer, .or .contractor licensed: by the State of: Washington, a notarized letter from the property y; owner authorizing the agent to subm,t this' permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal... I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND 1 AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING OW:I 7f=t• liar; G 9 a • ' T; . _ Date: �. r_, 2 . s • Signature: Print name: R ..- c w V OF: ►_-- e �.. • Phone: _` - , ' .'� 14. Fax .: I` .-. (�-5� Address: 144 i ",�D.'.4203 ; • ''... i�t r/Stale /Zip: 16 EsLLEciILF, WP} 1SPO7 MISCPMT.DC)C 7/11/96 CITY OF TUK;WILA Address: .s: 16033 WEST VALLEY NY Permit No: MI98 -0162 Suite: Tenant: 'Status: ISSUED Type. MISCPERM Applied: 08/26/1998 Parcel #: 000580-0005 Issued: 12/23/1998 k' kk4,4.k' k1,',,,,** kkk' k' k' k' kk- kkk41,k' kkA -kkk•k4'kk'kk'k.kk4hkk'k-kk4 0(1,141.kk't.k'k ' k44'k'4 4k:kkk.wk'kkkk'.k* Permit Conditions: 1. The 'applicant must notify the City ut i 1 ity inspector at 206 -.433 -0179 upon commenceni.n.t,and... -.comp 1 et ion of work at lea .t.- 24 hours in adva. rice:;:, Ai:':1 4th pest" ion-. requests for t utility work mu t a I o be m ur iade 24 honi "advance . Temporary erosion,; control ,measure_; .• ha11 • hi ' i'np'"Iemented as the first order "of' bus;j ri,e�: "to prevent _ ad imen"tat i.on off- site or intr• exist,in;g ,;t-o'r'�tt� 1. The site stiaj 1 have:: pe.r Manen t erosion control .:rrreasu r'e.r,. i n place as 'soon . a pa `:�s i b l e:• of ter=- �t I a l; _grading has been complet"ed`'ani,pri,or to,, the F;i.na1; Inspection 4 . PRI R ,TC1 `F INAL`< ;1I1;N: -t1FF P.�'PC IC'ANT' SJIALL sUBMJT t MYLARS ro ,PUBL IC WORKS. 5,. No changes m i l l be nt de,•' tc the plans un 1 e:.s appr°oved bey, them, - ' "Arch t;ect or: Enginee- and the:Tuwi la Building DiviLon., 6. Al l;urmit'�,, iris.pecti'i n record:,, '•anal approved' plans .shajl avaijab1'e ate the lob ;'ite" p"r'ior to the ;.tart of any cc'n -7:; 'st ^'uct1on� "' These ,�ioc:uni nt . a're to';' >be "maintained and 'a"v j able `unt i 1, f i'na 1, ,inspect i`on tappr ova1 i;'s-..gr�;anted. H 7, Al str,u;;ct'ura,l, concrete shall .0 h pea: a l inspected Sec306(.)1)'. (U ' 8. Whayll "`inspect i'on is `r'equ 1 r'eei =,`e i ther, the owner, aroh:;j te�'C' or :engineer Sha 1 1 'no`>tif `'' he Tukwi 1a Bui 1;din9'N D i vi ,`i0rt :of;: 4poin brierrt Faf the - i rtO Oat' ri,.' a e i i :prO, p u�� gr r u e p r �, x':, ie ths'O',1r tb`lrildin�g inspection. {k "'C,opi'er .of a`11. spec.,;i'a1t G; i n ✓ V`' d. L} p �,t 0, p4r'ts shall be suOlip,t�etl "t+�....tne:„.Bui ldIng D iv1 ton �nir a t'1ine1v manner. Report t she11V�`�,contaln a*r^es pro .je. ;y.nanre, per.;n t nuniber..and,jtvpe Of, 1p'Sv*ctlon 'heir. perto� t i UF 9. The spec. j.al 1ns-pectc.r-, shall Submit a ':f,i:na i�'•r' igned . 'f.por s t at ing';,:‘,iine the;i`;;i?he worjc requiring, :pao.ia1 inspe' 3 ion to the heat of 7th"e inspect icn w1 rf ;e" o,rr , .� o � ci;g e,�t i n c: u� tt'a r m � � c ".� with appr..o4 ed:•,,p l an , and sped( f f "c'a t ans and the '''app l i'' a;J 1 e wur4;man,�, hip p„io'riu1ons of the, u(1.. f ' fr p,� ��' 10. Al 1 c:on truct` ion t,o be done, in eOnfu,r niance Wi tim =c p f-r o,ved plans and reclafaiiiP.t4 of the . <Un1tcrrn 8ui ld)r q },.;-ede (1997 . .Edition) as amendad tinxt t orlri Mec han i c,a >i l7o e, W( 1997 Ed 1 t`i on) ,: and Washington State trie,e.gv qii;�cie . 199r7�tE44i.ran? 1 1 . Validity of permit. The i ssuanre a permit or appr ova l plans, specifications,, and ,computations 's.lial l nt be:.ccln- strued to'be a permit for, or an approval of, aria violat'inn, of any. of, the provisions Of the building code, or of any, other ordinance of the lur1 d1ction :.: No .'perM t presu.m;ingr give authority to violate or 'cancel the' prov .code sha1.1 be valid: (i) PLAN REVI / ACTIVITY NUMBER: MI98 -0162 DATE: 11 -30 -98 PROJECT NAME: CSM HOTEL — DETENTION VAULT Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # 1 Revision # _ After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: B ing Division !�W�tc- I I -Z•3 -a� Pfl p e('stc �;i ►��,/ 611 Fire 'revention Structural AP IZ- 7-'1' Planning Division 11/4- 41-07.-41Y Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete — Incomplete Comments: DUE DATE: 12 -3 -98 Not Applicable 0 TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route No further Review Required Routed by Staff (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) ri REVIEWERS INITIALS. DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 12 -31 -98 Approved El Approved with Conditions El Not Approved (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved C Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved (attach comments) Q REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE. WR•ROUTE,OOC CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 DATE: 1t 5 PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: ,4 %Iiip (34( PROJECT NAME: Cs, WbrL. $ bT (Mr PROJECT ADDRESS:_ CONTACT PERSON: PHONE: REVISION SUMMA � AWMt WisA3 IWi SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. Orm,E0e1V4 OP ru NOV 3 o 1998 PERMIT CENTER R /10 /OR ACTIVITY NUMBER: M198 -0162 DATE: 9 -21 -98 PROJECT NAME: CSM HOTEL Original Plan Submittal_ Response to Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division R. P blic Works. r.15 rt/bt.LOJP 11 L Fire Prevention -s , �$ Structura tic (Yl� Planning rDiiviision Permit Cb�'rd'in for DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete Incomplete ❑ Comments: DUE DATE: 9 -22 -98 Not Applicable ❑ TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route C No further Review Required Routed by Staff ❑ (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions hvre�l i61/1 Iyi-r DUE DATE: 10 -20 -98 Not Approved (attach comments) / htaiied DATE: REVIEWERS INITIALS: li Pia CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: \PR•ROUTE.DOC 6/98 CITY Ok l'UKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division-Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: 9 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: (1:::038 VSle* aley CONTACT PERSON: Pkue PHONE:(-') 6,4 4- 9 .57) • PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: rirrisiel-01607. REVISION SUMMARY: SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA slap 2 Mg pERMITCENTER bawd Bldg Planning: CITY USE ONLY 3/19/96 C PLAN REVI /ROUTIN'(; SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: M198 -0162 DATE: 8 -26 -98 PROJECT NAME: CSM HOTEL XX Original Plan Submittal Response to. Incomplete Letter Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works fx] Fire Prevention Structural Planning Division Permit Coordinator • DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues, Thurs) Complete El Incomplete Comments: DUE DATE: 8-27 -98 Not Applicable El TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route n No further Review Required E Routed by Staff E] (if routed by staff, make copy to master file and enter into Sierra) REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE: 9 -22 -98 Approved C Approved with Conditions Not Approved (attach comments) 0 REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE: Approved 0 Approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved (attach comments) fl REVIEWERS INITIALS: DATE: \PR•ROUTE,DOC 6/98 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 2_ Project: c 6A4 / Type of Inspec Address: O ` (- �. a/ u/ Date called: Special ins ructions: Q 11 I/4 [,, /1.---' Date wanted; r]� a.m. Requester: Phone: fpproved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: ",e...1/4", („/ ' Date: 27 •1?J 0 $47.00 REINSPECTI FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 1 .- -- 1 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 M 78- of ' PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project /fct,,, 4„1_64 Type of Inspection: iv (^ dr s e jj W.V. . r Date called: (f ,2 /� 14) Special instructions : ! Date wanted: 1 t a.m. p.m. Requestgr �1/ � It �4- / r `c, �`JJ Phone: Approved per applicable codes. J Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 1/uf oo PU) ,kQ Inspector: 6� Date: 1 l2f„l0 El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 1 Receipt No: 1 Date: ,f��. .. ,�:•�.•"'a?- '.vt(.. f.! a�' ktifid::,, f.:. f" ��:- aM1�.r.., �.' L":."<, j: r* tl.". �I: w: L... IF,; vTt 'i�+'raR:t»i.f�;ys.i'�t""f✓ri. .'."'S�i+i "': ;.t•,�` • City of Tukwila Fire Department .TURWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT FINAL APPROVAL FORM Project Name c-sA1 l-'t)lr John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Permit No. CO- 4, Address /( () 5' Lx (./C Retain current inspection schedule Needs shift inspection Suite # ? Approved without correction notice Approved with correction notice issued Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Hood & Duct: Halon: Monitor: Pre -Fire: Permits: fPo f.'"/c`' Authorized Signature Date FINALAPP.FRM T.F.D. Form.F.P. 85 rhkA *k*ar *kas *A• **.Akh•kft:sas:kk :t'k*has•k.*: tarA*.% A•• k• k** arAas •A*h:tkk:kk•k•k*•A*AA:t*h..•kA :TTY OF TUI'OUL.A» .41A r();x, q 9 * on (. '1!. TftGli�lit'fXT kAA ••k•.tfthAarA.**A***A.4 ** ** ** k!task • *-1 h. k l A *.4I h**A **A* *** • 1i HSMIT MUber. RS70083 ; Amaurt: 1,04 .e ; 092/ "A 25..E Payment Method: WIECf� Not itiane J(11 W1•f MST Triit:' ICJP Permit: Maj. MI98-0162, `roper, MISCP.ERM MISCELLANEO(1'3, PERMIT' Parcel Nq l 0005E10-0005: Sire Address: 1(x036 WEST VALLEY H.Y Total FOOT. ' This Payment (1.,04;;,.x, . Tutat1 ALL Pmts A` * X i �l+�+f rll I A �I * A A A E .'. kar •k •h,1* *alit• * *� � A' * a!+t *A•Astolat•AA * *A•i. *asa<arA Account. Go4E', 000/322:400 000/345,8 3,0 000/386.'SO4 4 Description f3UTl•f INO 7 tUINRES. PLAN CHECK '•- NON►tES--- . STATE f1UTLOT•NO . SUflCHr ROE .00 Amoufl t 631.00, 4i >ta,` 45 1Krazan & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION March 17, 2000 Project No. 066 -98189 MAR 2 2 2000 D Q QwNIT MEND- Mr. Dave Larson CITY OF TUKWILA Building Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Final Letter Regarding Tukwila Marriot Detention Vault 16038 West Valley Highway Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Larson: In accordance with your request and authorization, we have performed special testing and inspection services for the above referenced project. The special inspections for this project were: t Permit No. M198-0162 • Reinforcing Steel • Reinforced Concrete To the best of our knowledge, all work and noted deficiencies have been tested and/or inspected and have been found to be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and Chapter 17 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. If you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (253) 854 -1330. Respectfully submitted, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. William B. Throne Dean Alex Regional Manager Principa Pacific Northwest Region R.P.E. # W BTDAism cc Kiewitt Construction — Josh Stenson WM. I. AMwaw TU. 11 /...irrw 1rwl.rd efne/■a STORM DRAINAGE REPORT for SEATTLE - SEATAC COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT Tukwila, Washington Project No. 97029 Prepared for: CSM Corporation 2575 University Avenue West, Suite #150 St. Paul, MN 55114 -1024 (612)646 -1717 Prepared by: Pacific Engineering Design, Inc. 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206)431 -7970 EXPIRES: AUG. 4, 200o March 30, 1997 Revised 5/29/98 Revised 9/16/98: Mainflow restrictor Tee revised to reduce number of orifices from 3 to 2. 01 off. S EP 2 1 1998 Detention facility discharge will be released to a manhole located in the southeast corner of the site which is the beginning of a new conveyance system proposed to be constructed by the nearby BP -Oil project (see plans prepared by David Evans and Associates). This offsite system must be available prior to operation of the hotel project's system; therefore easements have been secured allowing the hotel to install the conveyance system should BP -Oil not be able to perform the required work. Off -site: The project is required to widen the existing roadway and install new curb, gutter and sidewalk along the frontage with SR 181. A conveyance system will be installed by the nearby BP -Oil project which collects street runoff at the new curb and releases it to an existing 18 inch diameter culvert that drains east under the highway and daylights along the east bank of the Green River. The project will participate in the cost of that portion of the conveyance system that extends across its frontage. COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE DESIGN All project storm runoff will be collected in a network ofcatchbasins, yard drains and roof drains and conveyed by underground pipe to the detention facility. Smooth interior wall pipe is specified for the conveyance system to enhance capacity and reduce maintenance. All elements of the storm system are sized via the "modified rational" method to convey 25 year storm flows. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT DESIGN As more than 1 acre of pavement is proposed with this project (1.37 acres total), a water quality treatment vault is required per King County SWM guidelines. To accomplish this, the required detention facility and water quality treatment facility have been combined into one large underground vault. In addition to the 6,013 cf of live detention volume proposed, an additional 4,997 cf of dead storage is provided for water quality treatment (3,485 cf required). The resultant vault is 22' wide by 77' long by 7' deep. In addition to the inclusion of dead storage in the detention vault, a coalescing plate oil - water separator is proposed to further treat runoff before it is released from the site. The separator is sized treat 2 year storm discharge from the detention/treatment facility. SEE THE FOLLOWING PAGES FOR DETENTION AND CONVEYANCE SIZING CALCULATIONS INCLUDING "WATERWORKS" SUMMARY REPORTS EXISTING DRAINAGE The project site is presently occupied with three duplex apartment buildings, two small houses and a barn. The residential units are accessed via a narrow asphalt paved road extended from West Valley Highway and leading to gravel driveways. There is only about 4 feet of relief across the site. A slight north -south trending ridge separates the site into two drainage basins: approximately 1.86 acres currently drains in sheet fashion to the east towards the abutting Puget Sound Energy right -of -way; the remaining 0. 84 acres sheet drains to the west towards SR181. The north 1/3 of the site (in proximity to the barn) is a pasture. The pervious areas on the balance of the site are vegetated with grass and a few scattered deciduous trees. The easterly 1.86 acres of the site is a part of sub -basin "A9" referenced in the Drainage Study Technical Report for City of Tukwila, Nelson Place/McLeod/Boeing CSTC, prepared by Hammond, Collier & Wade — Livingston Associates, Inc. (HCW -L) dated 12/29/92. This study determined pre - and post - development runoff rates for various storm events for the sub -basin and for entire Nelson basin. Downstream detention and conveyance facilities have been sized and constructed to accommodate the post - development flows referenced in the study. PROPOSED DRAINAGE On -site: Tukwila's Public Works Director, Mr. Ross Earnst has directed that all runoff from the project site be conveyed east into the Nelson Basin system. Under existing conditions, the portion of the site that drains east comprises approximately 13% of the of the "A9" sub - basin. Therefore stormwater detention is required to limit post - development site discharge to 13% of that established by HCW -L for that sub - basin. Accordingly, an underground detention vault is proposed which limits site discharge to 13% of the HCW -L established 2 -, 10 -, 25 -, and 100 year — 24 hour design storm rates for sub -basin "A9 ", i.e.: Design storm HCW -L "A9" disch. % allowed disch.allowed 2yr 3.81 cfs 13 0.50 cfs 10yr 5.83 cfs 13 0.76 cfs 25yr 6.95 cfs 13 0.90 cfs 100yr 8.17 cfs 13 1.06 cfs Detention facility sizing and flow restrictor design was accomplished using "Waterworks" hydrology software. In accordance with King County SWM guidelines, a 30% factor of safety was added to the required volume. 6,013 cf of live detention storage is provided (6,006 cf is required including the factor of safety). PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING ANO PLANNING CONSULTANTS ,oe Ti1 mil. • qzI SHEET NQ OF CALCULATED BY DATE ................. 1 i ! .A.......7... i= ?.,..1.0..... ...... i ................t. ...�.. A-..- t...A..7A,..!........ .1-..0 ......6........... I .............. t 4 .1. A. bi-..A .6. k..4.a - +- A,A- : -...7 , 100 A..4,............ 0' : 0 5 �....i .. A...�!1........_ 1.. 4. �. i3 P 7. :PA' ,� .. ....... � .. ...; II, ...46. 1 (47-. A c97. 51'17 I .41,z' z I l 2 ........../4... . I 13.... . ._ .�7i1�.. -1 A � +' • A7F�..t ..l� �...t.A-R 'tS. P t ..CAA ±. t ?. ts4 2; N.P.-I...AZ. 71 �g �oz • /_;• et%-�% : /: / /si / Carr,- .• �,i��7 4440A GZ, Z. 3 q, $.1. Gi.z. ofsii .1815.1.. 36,.1. 5,79 I4i..4o.. 3,y 1';17 I f..42- z.4; a7- 177 3, 7L 3,9(x.. b; (6... 3.3. cjZ 1 ��). �. 1 li �; :...1 ...... .....390. i ! i i i �. :. , I i . i : /24 1 . . , ( om-L ∎7' . c/ 4- 8 4io s .. � . 7/.c� ' a5/. I I2 I1S A f /►j p -Ss A' 4, � . i Pa2',Ti 0,l.I P .(�4.,c.- 7a'iC ) ,o4.r � I. , `...4. - j 1 ! a i : N . . ... 1....F?APT.to l.o.. - ...A°1 l..I ,¢•s.te i e-o., .r ..�.a.v.f .....1,n .5._LT ? j� 0,13 1 I.... ' I : 1 ........... 1......?r9p(Z Ttou�r0 ;4.1-Low fkrz .E,_1..:Pt. GH. A21�a'.... R�U.M. .. izL.. FozT o. I_.. �r ...'........ .......M `r'` • VTR , : , 1 I i 1 'f -.L.......! . , all..a:..4.c.... � � r , .... I ! f ...41. ..1. ...' � ° ! I.DO...1.t..1 %11.3....�� �'..,..I...1... a..........1► n c.f $ I ... .. i I City of Tukwila Nelson Place/TVJcLeod/Boeing CSTC Storm Drainage Study Technical Report nrr - :.L +��••� December 29,1992 City Project #92 -DRO5 Prepred by: Hammond, Collier & Wade - Livingstone Associates, In 4010 Stone Way North Seattle, Washington 98103- 8090 (206) 632-2664 HCW -L Proiect #92034'• C 31199 :- T11KWiLk r, BARN t) 90V ?p.0 ' I � 13% °F 1.)Etsdl to APARTMENT \1 II 11 � N p I pl 7 -1 +00 APARTMENT %/// ///1/F , .j I 42682.M._ 760.00' _.J2`w " CENTERL /N[ ROIY LAKE ..r� P/Pf UNf (5412)` i , I I\ I i 1 f�\1 Acts' h6\ (1413 TrtA%.) f 9- (ZQ,$ S GAa- sos -r i k Ns 11V 1J f..41 -1 f. 0 6A5T • i Y 6 re-" `ctK2 ytAkA.S_(' j:-c.) -MM. SiTe 1,5 (44 I MP ?u C PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING ANO PLANNINO CONSULTANTS JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE 'jlc1`rm ! . ; I t I . ....:....r IbC 1.- .. I .o.Ll...._ i ...5,1�i-...... D i 1 i t 1: \C,._ 1 _..I......... I.........610.31 . 3I....S1=- j 1 t' , 1ls ' oc. ti I S,�J1 .81� .SF..i v I G990 0$ _ ryy_ Lf.9 ,02 . ........................... ToTr.'\ OTAA- ;LL ' • ............ 1 j I1. .....: :.._.......:�::...I...:_ , j 1.. i , i , ' ' I., � I 7 `t�MM 1 11 , i 1' : p ................. , t �........ i.. j. I t 1. ... .... ..... 1. 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 (200' FAX PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS JOB SHEET NO, CALCULATED BY OF DATE T PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS JOB SHEET NO OF DATE 1 ICI CALCULATED BY •• t 1 I ft I 1 li 1 1 1 t .. 1 ' I 1 1' • 1- ' 1 " 1 ' ' - . It II * 1 1 i ..1. i • I i t :: '' 1- 1' . • 1 I' 1 [ I i I I 11 1 1 • : i . • [ 1 . '---y; i i 1 ; I 1 1 i I r 1 If 1* 1 f 1 i I ; t t , 1 1 • I 1 I • • • • • ' • I 1 ■ i 1, ? • . • , t I . • I I F } li 1 C..■6-4.1VN I ' 1 I I LZ, 1411r1 I ' 1 '. • I . i I ' , ' II 1 • I • • I 1 1 i T 1 , L-Li 441 , , 1,1 LI_ -;1-ti , f ! ; , i . 1, t , z#s.:-.; 2E,Ti— r 1.0'f it. , 4 I' 1. I 1 1 1 1 1 -2.• f *-- t t p;Itmi-.; 4 1 •I,,. 4. .... .!,, , 1 1 • 1 , , 1 .i, • ,?"..5.-1 1, L. 1 I . I ' 1 .1. • i - t P If.717 't . . i • I , 103 I.' 413 , 4. ;• , . 3 -z• 411 , f i ..........,...........,.....r(.1L-4_ •54.3 i 1 , '...' .[... . J1 • 1". I . I 1 • ..... T.. 1 I I , -1 . . ..1 I 1 1 1 . 1 i 1 t i i 1 r 4 , . ; , • I 4 4 4 • ; I 1 1 . 4 .. 4 1 4 • , .. 4 .. .. .. 4 • 4 , . Of. . .... 1 • .1 . .. ,. ...-: .1 1 1 f • ; I I i . „i • ...f• , 114 , i 1 ) 1- .... .., • 1 ; t . f 1 i ; 1 H . ' .4 T.' 4 4 . • 4 ' • 4 .. . • • . .. ... • • . • • .„ .. . . , 1 .• i '• 1 . ..' l• • - : l''.' • . . . • „•. • .••••,, ... • , • • ., . •. • • • . . . 4 ; ; 4 . , • .1 . 1. i 1 r t . I 4 I t ! 1 1 i I 4 .1 . if • 1 • . . I . 1. ; . • ' , ' I ' ' • ' ' • I , • , 1 ': • . "-:. :.'".1" ;;.: •••••:•:••• •„:•4.• ••'.,., :r,,,;',47•;.4••••• .'... 4 4 ; . ... 1 ' ' '. .' . - ' -' : , . . 1 - 4 t • 4 ., .. - ; . .:: I -:•••• ' ' . '. r' ' , ,.. ,.. , , 1, ,.. •-•. 1. 1 • , • , t • , 1 , • , • , : tj ilI w i1C) CIO 1 :. ',/ . � . f i (: _:. � l '+ C' . _ ''i :•. I i' • , TYPE,: AP.S i Rf:'1i ! :! 0N. CC,E�F • iris: ilk='s :1,D .00 Amin . PEAK <)TE': 1 .G6 c: f VOL . ,U1: • 1.00d r' 1:T.'1"H(:J['i'Jl..O ,`r PAIHFciLL 1 r::i:r'''TcrT Oi Tir:T .NTERV ;' 1= '1:..'TR"1c T rc:1N C05Fr.: h Sheet. 1' r_ j' «: a C. 11 C h t n n r -1 tT •._ 10 10 • L O a 1 l METHODOLOGY EAI TYPE ... . :T,.� CIPTTa1TI1:N 7 rF t:= INTt:.RVN . TRr1CT Tc :1N CO 1: F C1k: ! c1'1 �.�t. 1�1 •tl `'1F'::.; ,V r91,..1!!: tf r ..EA :'! 1 r') T TIME NAME: 100',i' TYPE1A ' PERVIOUS' • AR A . 2 .c.'0 min is '7;2'; 00 .r:. min:. 1F'ERV1OU'.. t'r:1£i,i'1 c .20 A;' : r i 1 . f1 ' Ac'.. : r'. ' CN c;,,; r.,0 . 1.. i(j .00 iv3 0 . 1?0�1 p.?yi.. 1' . ',':1 s '0 .0200 • 1_. 12$ .00 n. 0 0 LI 0 p12 y r. • .1 :93., 0; Q i c,1 L.: .,:1=3. . 610. F; c :, r) :i , 00 :. 0 .0100 ;. VOL `,.; ; A,,'..,_tt "rz1;i, 02 ,..f l' -ME. 2,85 `i. nc hes 10.00. rnzrl :::} 2'? (T; :1 ri • 0,20 •x RATE „ • r: . c: ;' ., VOL F::V:fOU'S '`iRE:A AREA 0 Cis :c0 9 . 00 • I PIE (4....• • • " - • • • • .7...••••"; .2. 7 • t:. ;.. ' ••• 7", ■:,,'L• 1' 3 i , 7) r 'TYPE. . TYPE I A T . . . . nf: r • ;',1-;;E. . . . 2 1.," i* .•:, T ?.:.7 . . • 1. . to. 1: . . . 7 T '7, Fi.1 -; 7 r f"'N f 1 20 • • -.;:•:F:1:ri. • 1 „ , ''••• t: !.. • 1 5 • (X.), 11 : (7: .. I 77, : .1 7, : ) ••• -.•F• t: L : 1, 0,7) ' , •" :7• 7 • 1. , 1 ••'r 1"1 - n n L.. '3. . 00 . : : 0 . 0 100 • • I "T. ! ! t: 7 7 • 4 fp a 1. rIAMT. 1c)t.).:1b1:•. i r T 0 1:;)1:31. LL T . . . 11.7.4 • 1 0 1- I . . . n • C • . • 1717, i e".■ ION • 0 . • A . • 1.:„ •:3 • C , . (3 r•W T 0•. .*:•1• ‘,/(:)1 : • . 7 -- T r17. : min • ?'.....,-'4. '.• ti'- 1 I ',1) : ::: :::', d NAME 1 ':::', 5 Y T' t'.. 0 t 3 1 d .F. v • s i. ,..i, 3u-1 mETHCIEPDLOGY . . . . L. E A : 7:: , 70 ,=••,,:•;r :.. F.: eAliEF LOWS ; . • • 0 . 66. cf..::: ' , • ke,'Cl. INIF -'11., L TYPI.F. . . .. , : TYPE. 1 A P E R V I qui, AR r...-'..A , : - .• , ' ' ' PRE.0 IP' TAT ICIN . . . i 1 ., : ..1 • ..3', t ' : . ("1;;:i-LA . . ; . . . .0..:? 7 •A',:::1• es, , T ti• 1;7 7 NT F.:. RVAI. : 10 , 00 rit 3.. n CM ,•.. ,.: - 92 .00 .. . . . T I OE 0;7 C 01'..iC: . . : . . . , ' . . - ; 5 ni i n li.IPEc17.01.1‘.-7, A 13 •1-.., 1' RAC T 7 CIIN! (- 'DE Fr F : 0 . ::: •) A ',.:: E A . . • : . : 1 . 1;: !.3. A c V 4:-,:.::. 1:':,1 , ,' , .. : : 913 .00., '• ' ..• .1 7 i: 1..,: ..:, ..-4 ,•' 1 -- ..c.,l'il-:-..e 'I,. L. = 15 . 00 i'M : 0 . :... 5 0 0 p .::-; r :' 1 .c. 5 . ti:: 0 T - ''..':... ..,:; ,'': i '. - •::. : ,...:f 1„ : L 2. 5 , CIO ri•:::: 4. 0 , 0 I 10 P :::.:,),' .1* 1 1 , '7-,' -7, • !.:,': 0 .1..": I 40 1•-■ 9 11 *.'1 7:. 1 ;., ! '4:7' 3 , (.' .:.' . CI 0 ::::, : 0 . 0100 ' ' • ' , :: - " . . . 4i. ':.:10 . 6, i..ri-, ''.:z c f.F k.hx. : ='; ,,,,:...=:: :-41. • .1.7- HC.7. :: ... . ... ' 7NFALL TYPE....! lIrF TflYERVAL... A7-:TRACTION COEFF • ;1;7 ?.• r copc COEFF: 1 J. =-? • • T'(1:' 1; • t...'EPtiffju..,,.. • 10.00 min CN..,.: FIPERVIOUS tZFA • .':.••••••••. ' • • .77, t 1 I I-1,F. • . • et: n' • .1 . i ne.-1-14.• 10..00 min. n - L 15.00 1",:.ReoCh L. : 125.00 R'*,ach ChanmA L : 49'3.00 RATE: 0 # cfs VOL:. ID COHMETHQOOLOGY RAINFALL TYPE..,..: TIME INTERVAL....: 'TIME OF C.ONO .. .. : ,(zCT ION cOEFF.: !,7Y.-ITE7 A• • • . . . . ARE. • • 1 5 AO r r.4; p.! , d • • : 0.1 C'0 1 : 0 , 110 p.2>1 : Fc::42,C0 s :0.0100 • C., t T 6 100y 1 4 . "2.'0 Acr(i,s • :0 :00. t's TYPF1A PE RV Olk& NH • ‘• •• • . inches AREA ; .2,15 A c.".:.r • 10.00 min , • CH 92 . • ,• rn 1 If r RVI 0 . 20 ' AR 1 2 ;15: .Ac Cf b . 0 • • c f -f t • TI ' ••••• • '-4.'"(.7.1- r11 ,r! : . , • .Y' • i ( t., r. ;� .( • r'. 1.7) ,,,7.1 .':'',"'''.., .v t:er 0,1r:1..?.C3'' _,1•:Ci,•r„ .. ,.,. e, '1 . . "r F...: -.. ., -? i'li.f ii .,F f)!..t- T•'(P T,. {P'E -1 A �-'•.RV 1 OLIS. .I t.,;,t Ti I r''.. 77 h11- t' r; k.'i,l i' 1 0 .0,, 0 f11:.•n . r N - r "r , (• ?h. ri., f. ONIC., ° z:,', ^ fit l..'•I. f �.1.01`F.T.:VT:`I! 1`.. f:.a�;.!'I. 1*} : :::5 (.. 1 I{.1 �' C.C.', ... F . . 4 . .0 AR A . 1.. .. i A. T::r;'_•:.) r:?•. .chr•::t L . 1 ,.C) i,.., 0 ..!.5 0U_` r'',•r •! : rr.0%C,JG . 'r : ••:..:3 t: ''. — • ii,.. : Y L.. 1:: 5 . 0(: ,r1•7:1: . C: 1', !. 1.......' P. ,y 1.. , ■ .. • rJ 0 L.e 11. Tc: 3t:11 T hciI):if. 1 L. ,:i93 .(0 k' •cl,'.00 0: ,0 I f`". • C'f;' . C•AT.7.: ? ;' - • t/ •731,:• h ,ref. .f� r" ;r .I: i T T jai." . 9/16/98 Pacific Engineering Design Inc CSM Hotel Tukwila, Wa Detention design using 'Waterworks' hydrology software SBUH methodology with SCS type 1A rainfall distribution HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf \AcFt Acres. 1 0.496 490 11106 cf 1.86 2 0.759 490 17076 cf 1.86 3 0.904 490 20414 cf 1.86 4 1.063 490 24095 cf 1.86 5 0.961 480 15433 cf 2.70 6 1.488 480 24017 cf 2.70 7 1.780 480 28834 cf 2.70 8 2.101 480 34155 cf 2.70 9 0.497 510 15433 cf 2.70 10 0.758 510 24017 cf 2.70 11 0.905 510 28834 cf 2.70 12 1.055 510 34155 cf 2.70 13 0.459 510 15433 cf 2.70 14 0.693 520 24017 cf 2.70 15 0.802 520 28834 cf 2.70 16 0.956 520 34155 cf 2.70 page . .‘ •,' • , (ft) !"*;(:) IC) ! • l'• . , T /.1.!,,...r • D . f v 1 7) .1', • f . 7700 Width: . is . STAGE (-7--8TORAGE----/ STAGE ( :T0.AC: 51p:11 ; (ft) -.cf."- --Ac-Ft- (ft) Ift) 7-Ac7Fit.- 17.20 17•.10 .17.40 17.50 17,60' 17.70 17.63 17.90 0.000:3 169,4) 339,90 50.;,20. 677,60 947,00 • 1016 1165 1155 1525 1694 0.0000 0.0039. 0.0079 0.0117 0.0155 0,0194 0.0233 0,0272 0.0311 0.0250 0.0384 • 16.20 18,40 19.50 18,60 19.70 18.80 19.90 19,0) 19.10 14.10 19.30 1963 2033 2202 2372 2541 2710 2880 100 3214 3388 ?F:s7 0.0429 0.0467 0.0505 0.0544 0.0593 0,0622 0.0661 0.0700 0.0719 0.0779 0,0817 19.50 19.60 19.70 19.80 19,90 20.00 70.10 20,20 20.10 20.40 3727 7996 .4066 4235 4404 4574 474:. 4.11 5062 5j5! 5121 0.0894 0,0U: 0.0972 0.1011 0.1050 0.1089 0,1128 0.1167 0.1206 0.1241 20.50 .20:n 20,90 20.90 21,00 21.10 21.20 21:25 5:40 0.1262, 71.0 0,1221 6098 0.1400 6258 0.14,33 6437 0.1476 .:507 0,1517 6775 0,1556 5651 0,1575 V°1-4-itne 17(e-OJIP SIA ZOi-K7 4'01.31e- F- • et0/7, 6ad ee 62'4914 ' •:' 7, . h i=v T r f . STGE ijAGE ) !ft) (ft) (=t) --- - - (ff: 17.20 0,0000 0.0000 • 1E1.5) 1692 0.0355 14,80 3353 0.0777 21.1) 5075• ,0.1165 17.20 1)0.13 0,0030 15,60 len o.o4t, 11.90 .3511 0.0307 21,20 5205. 0,Wi 17,42 260.26 0.0060 18,70 1952 0.0443 20,00 3644 0,0836 21.30 5335 0.1225 17.50 390.39 0.0090 19.50 2082 0.0478 20.10 3774 0,0856 21,40 5465 '0,1255 17,60 520.52 0.0119 18,40 2212 0.0508 20.2') 3904 0.039: 21'.50 -5596 0.1285 17,70 650.65 0.0143 14,00 2242 0.051$ 20..30 0,0925 21;50 5726 0,1314 17.50 730,73 0.0179 19.10 2472 0,0563 20.40 4164 0.0956 21.70 5556 0.1)44 17.40 110,41 0.0204 11,20 2603 0.0597 10,50 4201 0,0186 •21,30 5136 0,13'4' 13.00 1011 0.0239 19.30: 273) 0.0:4.27 23.6) 4421 n53 12.067 20.70 4555 044 22:10 62,!4 • 0,1j: 13.20 1201 0.02'2 19.50 2493 0.069' 20,50 4615 0.1075 11.30 1171 0.0324 11,60 3122 0.0717 20.10 11.12 0.1105 13.40 15:2 0.035? 1'1.70 3253 0.0747 21.0 !II= VoLtsim G GIN6tE.- 20 .10 4c•zo,r vouysiG t1.9.% IngA.t.101N 30./o Vt.trro4.... of- SP4r 9/16/98 Detention design SBUH methodology Pacific Engineering Design Inc CSM Hotel Tukwila, Wa using 'Waterworks' hydrology software with SCS type 1A rainfall distribution page 17 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. cstr Description: flow restriction device Structure: riser Structure: Structure: reori Structure: Structure: STAGE <-- DISCHARGE - - -> STAGE (ft) -cfs (ft) 17.20 17.30 17.40 17.50 17.60 17.70 17.80 17.90 18.00 18.10 18.20 18.30 0.0000 0.1395 0.1972 0.2415 0.2789 0.3118 0.3416 0.3690 0.3944 0.4184 0.4410 0.4625 <-- DISCHARGE - - -> STAGE < - -DISC - - -cfs (ft) - - -cfs- 18.40 18.50 18.60 18.70 18.80 18.90 19.00 19.10 19.20 19.30 19.40 19.50 0.4831 0.5028 0.5218 0.5718 0.6027 0.6299 0.6551 0.6788 0.7013 0.7229 0.7438 0.7639 19.60 0.783 19.70 0.802 19.80 0.820 19.90 0.838 20.00 0.882 20.10 0.910 20.20 0.936 20.30 0.959 20.40 0.982 20.50 1.003 20.60 1.024 20.70 1.044 9/16/98 Pacific Engineering Design Inc CSM Hotel Tukwila, Wa Detention design using 'Waterworks' hydrology software SBUH methodology with SCS type 1A rainfall distribution page 18 STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. reori Description: flow restrictor Outlet Elev: 17.20 Elev: 15.20 ft Orifice Diameter: Elev: 18.60 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: Elev: 19.90 ft Orifice 3 Diameter: STAGE <-- DISCHARGE - - -> (ft) - - -cfs 17.20 17.30 17.40 17.50 17.60 17.70 17.80 17.90 18.00 18.10 18.20 18.30 0.0000 0.1395 0.1972 0.2415 0.2789 0.3118 0.3416 0.3690 0.3944 0.4184 0.4410 0.4625 4.0313 in.'ZrR To Gp serarsA x- 1.9219 in.lo'R. 1.7500 in. v., .ipolfz. STAGE <-- DISCHARGE - - -> (ft) - - -cfs 18.40 18.50 18.60 18.70 18.80 18.90 19.00 19.10 19.20 19.30 19.40 19.50 0.4831 0.5028 0.5218 0.5718 0.6027 0.6299 0.6551 0.6788 0.7013 0.7229 0.7438 0.7639 STAGE < - -DISC (ft) - - -cfs- = 19.60 19.70 19.80 19.90 20.00 20.10 20.20 20.30 20.40 20.50 20.60 20.70 0.783 0.802 0.820 0.838 0.882 0.910 0.936 0.959 0.982 1.003 1.024 1.044 9/16/98 Detention design SBUH methodology ( Pacific Engineering Design Inc CSM Hotel Tukwila, Wa using 'Waterworks' hydrology software with SCS type 1A rainfall distribution page 19 RISER DISCHARGE Description: 12 inch Riser Diameter (in): Weir Coefficient...: Orif Coefficient...: STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE ID No. riser riser 12.00 elev: 20.75 ft 3.782 height: 21.25 ft 9.739 increm: 0.10 ft STAGE ‹--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---cfs STAGE ‹--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISC (ft) - - -cfs (ft) ---cfs- 20.75 20.80 0.0000 0.1089 20.90 21.00 0.5658 1.2174 === 21.10 2.016 21.20 2.537 9/16/98 Detention design SBUH methodology Pacific Engineering Design Inc CSM Hotel Tukwila, Wa using 'Waterworks' hydrology software with SCS type 1A rainfall distribution _ page 20 LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY < DESCRIPTION MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <- PEAK -> > (cfs) (cfs) - -id- - -id- <- STAGE> _ 0.96 pvlt reori 18.47 1.49 pvlt reori 19.47 1.78 pvlt reori 20.08 2.10 pvlt reori 20.75 0. .0 0.96 fvlt cstr 18.28 0.76 1.49 fvlt cstr 19.16 0.90 1.78 fvlt cstr 19.70 1.06 2.10 fvlt cstr 20.29 route 2yr storm route 10yr storm route 25yr storm route 100yr storm route 2yr storm route 10yr storm route 25yr storm route 100yr storm naettrii U.& APELf 9 ,qTeri , dm,,V G- 0/7e' n►/ f See `t el L' • %3o or //e /so,/ /313X'iA1 41 -9 4,s 4aV (7) File dAta Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool Pacific Engineering Design In2 DESCRIPTION ROUTING COMPARISON TABLE MATCH INFLOW STO DIS PEAK PEAK OUT PEAK PEAK No. No. STG OUT HYD :route 2yr storm 0.50 0.96 pvlt reori 18.47 0.50 9 :route 10yr storm 0.76 1.49 pvlt reori 19.47 0.76 10 :route 25yr storm 0.90 1.78 pvlt reori 20.08 0.90 11 :route 100yr storm 1.06 2.10 pvlt reori 20.75 1.06 12 :route 2yr storm 0.50 0.96 fvlt cstr 18.28 0.46 :route 10yr storm 0.76 1.49 fvlt cstr 19.16 0.69 :route 25yr storm 0.90 1.78 fvlt cstr 19.70 0.80 :route 100yr storm 1.06 2.10 fvlt cstr 20.29 0.96 1 1 >Done< 13 • 14 15 16 Press any key to exit There may not be enough memory to do large LPool routings Available Memory remaining: 56416 bytes Current Data Set Name: c:\drvd\egenious\prior\works\97029\FINAL PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS JOS 6C lY) H arc-.L SHEET NO. OF 972. f CALCULATED BY / f ' 7 DATE ■ I ; I ; • I t , r �� I ` • I � '44 i � f i {.. . : .,{ , , "• r I ` �i I ; I i ._ 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 . (206) 431 -7970 FAX:431-7975 V I • A PACIFIC ENGINEERING LESION INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING ANC PLANNING CONSULTANTS C JOB Ct' 0'1 1.-/OrEL • g7a�9 SHEET NO. /l � � OF _ �7 CALCULATED BY DATE >� 1 ■3'%"� Oe 7.20.. ; ..........._.... ...................... 016 I 1 II g i • I i I j I f : T 7 ..... ..... °i • • i 48 -CPS OIL WATER SEPARATOR Projected Plate Area = 592 Sq/ft Maximum Process Flow = 555 GPM to 8' -11" \- UV Co. 2.332P, Galvanized Diamond Plate Cover 2 -Ton Lit Anchor 4 Places In Top Section TOP ELEVATION PLAN VIEW INLET I.E. INLET PIPE With Sampling Tee By Others — Coalescing Media Hold -Down 11A," Dia. Lift Insert 1 Each Corner, 4 Corners In Base Section Oil Retaining Baffle -- Sediment Weir -- STRUCTURAL NOTES: 1. Concrete: 28 Day Compressive Strength fc = 5000 psi 2. Rebar: ASTM A -615 Grade 60 3. Mesh: ASTM A -185 Grade 65 4. Design: ACI. 318.89 Building Code ASTM C•857 "Minimum Structural Design Loading For Underground Precast Concrete Utility Structures" 5. Loads: H -20 Truck Wheel wl 30% Impact Per AASHTO GENERAL NOTES: 1, All Baffles and Weirs To Be Precast Concrete 2. Static Water Depth = 4'A" 3. Contractor To: Supply and Install All Piping 8 Sampling Tees Grout In All Pipes Fill w/ CLean Water Prior To "Start -Up" Of System Verify All Biockout Sizes and Locations Coalescing Media J SECTION AA 134.1 to OPTIONAL TOPS 2' -9" and 3'•9" Heights OUTLET I.E. — OUTLET PIPE With Sampling Tee By Others • OUTLET PIPE TO BE LARGER THAN INLET PIPE INFORMATION NEEDED: - Top Of Separator Elevation - Inlet Pipe Size - Inlet Pipe Elevation • Outlet Pipe Size - Outlet Pipe Elevation BASIC DESIGN INFORMATION: INFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS - 011 Specific Gravity = 0.88 Operating Temperature = 50' Influent 011 Concentration = 100 ppm Moan 011 Droplet Size = 130 micron 0.033 ft/min Oil Rise Rate Designed Per Washington State Department Of Ecology 100% FLOW EFFLUENT COLLECTED RATE QUALITY SIZE 146 GPM 10 ppm 60 Micron 4 1' TOP SECTION No. 48 -CPS -T 4,530 lbs. � ��!�3• J lid <�J .a -: 48 -CPS OIL WATER SEPARATOR Projected Plate Area = 592 Sq /ft Maximum Process Flow = 555 GPM ��•• UV Co. 2.332P / Spring Assisted / Galvanized Diamond Plate Cover w/ Locking Latch 2 -Ton Lift Anchor 4 Places In Top 1' 9" 1 1/4" Dia. Lilt Insert 1 Each Corner, 4 Corners 011 Retaining Baffle OUTLET PIPE With Sampling Tee By Others OUTLET PIPE TO BE LARGER THAN INLET PIPE BASE ASSEMBLY No. 48 -CPS -B 15,430 lbs. 8' 2" 6'5" 8'•11" INLET PIPE With Sampling Tee By Others Coalescing Media Sediment Weir J UTILITY VAULT COMPANY' P.O. BOX 588 , ,:: ,, .70 a:> For Details Of Access Covers, See COVER Section. • ITEMS SHOWN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. • Il.t • SYMBOL NAME AO Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 0 to 6 percent slopes AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes A9D Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 15 to 30 percent slopes AkF Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep Am8 Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes • AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes • An Arents, Everett material • BeC Beausite gravelly sandy loom, 6 to 15 percent slopes flrlf) 13- 01,•1■,. grn .Ily ••..•I•• I....., IS t•. ?n ,, r ..•..1,. . BeF Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Bh Bellingham silt loam Br Briscot silt loom Bu Buckley silt loom Cb Coastal Beaches Ea Earlmont silt loam Ed Edgewick fine sandy loam EvB Everett gravelly sandy loom, Oto 5 percent slopes EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes EwC Everett•Alderwood gravelly sandy looms, 6 to 15 percent slopes InA Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes InC Indianola loamy Fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes InD Indianola loamy Fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes KpB Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes KpC Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes KpD Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes KsC Klaus gravelly loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes Ma Mixed alluvial land NsC N•Ilton very gravelly loamy send, 2 to 15 percent slopes Ng Newberg silt loom Nk Nooksack silt loom No Norma sandy loom Or Orcas peal Us Oridio silt loom OvC Ovoll gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes OvD Ovall gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes OvF Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand Pk Plichuck fine sandy loom Pu • Puget silty cloy loam Py Puyallup fine sandy loom RaC Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent elopes RaD Rognor fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes RdC Ragnar•Indlanola association, sloping • RdE Rognar•Indianola association, moderately steep • Re Renton silt loam Rh Riverwash So Salal silt loom Sh Sommamish slit loom Sk Seattle muck Sm Shalcor muck Sn SI silt loam So Snohomish silt loam Sr Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant Su Sultan silt loom Tu Tukwila muck Ur Urban land Wo Woodinville silt loam • The composition of those units Is more variable than that of the others In the area, but It has been controlled well enough to Interpret for the expected use of the soils. Bounder/, nornse: ;we Cow,ty, Pars• !:,4J townshit Incorporated co pesvvorinn, n•1 Small park, ce -• Land grant Township or run) Tn reship or roe.:• Section line, Uri Section line, acct Township hne, n Section line, not Section corner, Fr. Boundary monume, United Stares mina Buildings (dweIIr. School, church, a•. Buildings (barn, w Power rrar,smissi . Telephone Iimt, r• Hells other than v. Tanks; oil, water, I.'r,rrvrl or Id rb• IL.rlruntul and veer• Tubby,, spirit L. Other rncuverut. IL ?irnrdul curdy •1 Any racnverut.l. .Vertical control s• Other re,nveruli Checked spot Our Unchecked %put el. Insets, shoat 4 122.10 122•oli 1 rot SNOHOMISH COUNTY1 $9 r f„ • r.: riI 0 E O 7 o O O 0 0 O O O og 3 C N .- s- r- r N Orl N r +., 1III 11111 Veta, a 111 M II1IuiIII1I1IOhIII 0 N O C 1111 o g V ilill M IR a NI V' Q o M O SEATTLE, WA 98188 FAX 431 -7975 (206) 431 -7970 >g N Z o IlIliiiiriiuruiiIIllII N O O IIIIliiriiuiuiurIIIIIII R. Klein I-IINI O O 1I1I1I1I1IIIIIIIIll O 11111 ci O000 O U 1111111 IV fV N fV of (V 0 ti 07 PhI q 0 � o q 0 .�, 0 $ 0 .$ 0 0 rt el el yy111 .�Op O ililill 1 I Projel Seattle-SeaTac Courtyard 1 I RATIONAL METHOD PEAK RAINFALL INTENSITY I 0 or 25 l II 0 .? 111 r N 0 ; N 0 uiuiIIIIII ^�- NGD 11111 0 0 0 1111111111 W u► v N M u1I N 1111111 O O Ti 1111111111 O O FIC ENGIN design storm (years) gi E o 2 llIll'IlllIllIIllll 8 I LOCH From I a. toms wok ins f. or 4_2I NH =MCC? 1 0 100.171NO WWI= LAND 04 24 nay 1-1212. TAPPROO SUM & CATE VAL1C MV 14.75' I-01401972 AMINO SS S. 1(...cr.•swerasan...-...—st.ms.• , 441 .:45gym ASPNAJ.1 PAWYDIT t 2 CATCH SASRI I CATCH RAM POSED NVAIEVO MALL WM wan IPOSED ROCXIRY IIITH MONT WOOD PLOW OPECI294 SW GRAM WIND COMM u NTH [MAHON SONO CONTOUR UK MIN LL1VAROV NIA= COV0,42712 CUM. ACC Pt um wooni N-I2 OR 21UIVILDIT. Mg HMO DUX= 30 PROVOC 101.004 PICKN1C04 001/0190 -'1i1 MCC lUILDINCt (211 li(CHINICAL U'IUT M3) CISTCTOR DOME CHM VALK 1.21ILY ION 119( tICRWX 04902 IMMO MIDI VALK 11001I (KZ InCHANICAL M SMUT NI) fr 741'30 1 • ....... 76 111111 , • 1,r14;•";- • SCALE 1 1" - 50' it 97-29 Pwoocer NO. DB DRAWN BY 3-20-98 ISSUE OATC SHEET REVISION 5 CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 1\i/L■faC2.1o"\-V LAi "c" 0420A \iikiOLT \(1.4-0A. (24), �(9-1/ tG9'� 010 MI-18-ca97- D2 KI CONSTRUCTION cTION CO. NOV 2 3 1998 SFATAC COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 014.2258 art OF ruKwlm NOV 3 0 1998 PERMIT CENTER Miles Consulting 1806 136th Pl.. NE #200 Bellevue. W4 98005 -2319 grew, c A.2 .A06 qt .I1.t.b NN n0 Gov t�crL DETENTION TANK DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Design loads are for the actual dead loads and HS20 vehicle.. Soil Load Depth is determined from Civil Engineering Plans. Construction should be in accordance with latest edition of UBC Section 108 and should include; 1. All concrete work phases and strength. 2. Provide special inspection by Geotechnical Engineer confirming assumed soils parameters. 3. Any fill placed below footings or slab has sufficient compaction to at least 95% ASTM D -1557. Prior to excavation it shall be the Contractors responsibility to determine if any underground utilities exist in the area. Tank foundations have been designed based on; Allowable Bearing 2000 PSF Soil Weight 110PCF Active Pressure 35 PCF (Retaining) Active Pressure 50 PCF (Restrained) Passive Pressure 300 PCF Coef. of Friction .40 (SF =1.5) Foundation excavation shall extend into undisturbed soil. Should filling occur, it will be place to 95% compaction and shall be inspected for adequacy. Back - filling of the walls shall be accomplished using a free draining material. Back -fill evenly around tank to prevent overloading specific points on the wall. Provide drainage as required to carry away any local ground water which might accumulate in the back -fill or pond behind wall. Concrete construction for cast -in -place concrete shall be inspected and tested. The concrete shall attain a minimum 28 day strength of fc'= 3000 psi. Use of add mixtures shall have Owner approval. (Strength required e back - fill.) Reinforcing steel shall conform to ASTM A- 615 -68, Grade 60. Lap splices shall be a minimum of 30 bar diameters. Fy= 60,000 psi. All horizontal reinforcing bars in walls shall be lapped around the corners. The reinforcing shall be protected by minimum cover as detailed on the plans, or when not detailed per UBC Concrete Construction. 22 HtGliWAY :R■OCES 3.10.1 Ntz3.44 iv,teCOlds 40•••LeS• 401• r L. BS 4520.44 8,CC0 LBS. 132,000 L S. 32 000 LBS .HS1S•44 6 000 LBS. 24,000 LBS. 24.000 LBS. 3i �I N� 14' -0" COI V 11`W 0.4W W • COMBINED WEIGHT ON THE FIRST TWO AXLES WHICH IS THE SAME AS FOR THE CORRESPONDING H TRUCK. V • VARIABLE SPACING — 14 FEET TO 30 FEET INCLUSIVE. SPACING TO BE USED IS THAT WHICH PRODUCES MAX.MUM STRESSES. CLEARANCE ANO t40A0 LANE WIOTH 10'43" 2.,0" 6' Figure 3.7.TA. Sundsrd HS Trucks •in the design of ii:ober (loon sod .x:hoiro ?ic steel Seeks tescludin$'vsnrer+ a beemsl for HS 20 lading. one sale load of :4.:40 pounds or !WO sateleads of 16.:30 pounds area. spaced 4 tat apart may be used. whichever produces :tie putts stress. :mind o(tbe )2,OOOliound uls shown. •`For slab design. :Le caner line of »heels stall be mused to be 1 fool from face of curb. (See Article 112 BICRWAY BRIDGES APP. A LOADING - H 20-44 • TABL.L Or MAXIMUM MOMENTS, SHEARS AND REACTIONS. --- SIMPLE S?AS , ONE LANs . Spans in feet; moments in thousands of foot - pounds; shears and reactions in thousands of pounds. These values are subject to multiple Iazes. Impact not included. Tad shear Eat .r�a., and .al sal end lass Wom,nt maims 41 Spas Kamen.. rscttos (a) 11 9111 1/ 39.9 1111 1 9.0(1) 11.1 1 10.o(b) 12.0-(11 10 !/3.9(14 19.4 9 11./(11 II 11(b) u /os.7(b) 10.1 4 1:.o1e) $2.9(11 41 125 4( 11.1 9 /0.o(b) 111.9(b) 10.... 411.9(1) 11.9 • 11.9(11 11.0(1) 11 493.1(1) 11.9 1 11.011) 11.911) 14 1!3.! 111 /1.1 • / /.0(b) 11.0(1) 30 /01.1(1) 13.0 • 11.e(b) - 1:.0(1) 11 130.1 11.9 19 10.0(b) 11.0(1) /0 . . 151.• 13.1 11 )1,0(1) 12.0(1) 41 111.9 11.9 11 / /.ocet 1:.0(b) N 111.7 11.9 11 101.0(1) 12.0(1) N 1111 11.1 19 .. 111.0(13 12.0(1► N 971.9 17.9 19 .. 220.0113 11.111) 71 .. 7 7.9 11.9 14 ... 11!.0(1) 13.0(b) 71 717 s 10.9 11 ... 131.0(1 Si 4(1) 10 971.9 11.9 19. 111.0(1) 13!(1) u 910./ 13.1 19.. .. 112.9(1) 11.1(1) >e 1,053.9 111 29 160.11(14 $1.1(b) 16 1.111.1 19.9 specincation reduction for loading of 11 111.0(1) 14.1(1) 130 1410.9 ' 6/ 0 HI 171.011) 11.111 110 1.113.9 91.1 ' 11 111.004 11.1(11 120 1,911.9 04.9 19 111.0 (11 19.111) 130 1.117.1 97.9 14 100.0(1) 19.1(1) 110 1.111.9 19.1 14 101.0(1) 13.7(1) 111 1,171.9 14.9 11 119.0(1) 11.1(11 110 1.740.9 171 2.9 121.1(1) 31.0(1) 179 1.077.9 10.0 19 131.7111 10.1(1) 110 1,101.0 13.0 19 111.1(11 10.1(1) 110 1.711.9 54.1 11 L14.1 (1) 19.1(1) 239 9.1oe.0 00.9 11 161.1(1) $9.1(1) 220 9.51211 11.0 11 171.1(1) 19.1(1) 119 9.111.9 101.1 19 114.3(1) 19.9 :10 0.171.9 1091 11 119.0-(1) 174 110 1.911.1 111.9 *0 104.1(1) 17.1 104 1010.9 113.9 57 111.1(11 17.1 11 129.111) 111 19 139.0(1) 111 10 • 311.0(1) 111 41 Cos castrated bat b aoa Ode red i'a:d el as 81p"rt. Laa3r m14 ars thaw atlouleul for a$?. Loal7) so seas 10.4nala.l b Iua14 r9 Tr.( di Lans�. OtP.rnt,o the Manta e4 Las. Arz.z.L m 70■L L. A. witc41/41 , Coola - a11t 4.L)LT. 7)%,(2..r - r..tA3v4. i2A. _ 5L,)(2-4r-t2-J- -.70e t / It • `6(23 (Acii az. us- e"--k144 co. _ tS *- - 21s,s2. k 1.45 tarrINIL "TOeb 1 L. C4.94sta . (tV1•3 )0840Q ttei4 S15 4.4h:c. 40p3.eitz (t4.ti K141,3s3, ) 1'20 : t$(i 401 .., t (47367.0P0DAt5D a 141VOE t 0:1Y,t3314)0•00X0 •__ _32,8t$ .s.‘410.4 Ne4.3sxli.3s)(1,35) .=___4tivel 61 ollirm■••• MAN. k21.9 1._00) (19.*flbeo) ICM:34 -41/41 -TA L 0 LO onCrt. - 'St + ipo+..cy,) ttal x ?.fl %%00 8815"rt §111._„"zi ‘S.cD4c - 1414 ko _424 • _ • , It.4t A.ZS V-. 4" 244. U.� ‘kL_. -z A (-zdko> Cz.lott (. 0) (t .2 0) 4,..taPz It .3 4 7tAtik) wrt1.� S(1.0)(.44 ( d) z ?orris* 1.ck.b1 Ct S3,(1S0) z 60.41) (441.0)(62.4) = otlY2.01 Lkd,t, Lo AT ko 1(00 -z kb Solt g+ittsZcl' 4 2 0 1D 5 • • =N 4L-APz wi r ` (Az.„ 4‘. ,,,\ C71.1aL. `z{'/ 4PAvcJ . 1 ' `= 66 L 1 / m.mrt. ld \.j z St ' / L Net.. G (d clOO (SP)44 -, °�� l%4 Ct� '.'2: Fc. �•7 %rt '3 z 24,4 PV.64-ct) scoo (LA= Gococ) .Codt 1�� \L.= %v- - t,i(tcoc`z)= 2e`7Ce 1 a1a-darC 044-7P -1430(Y) SoCo°,2t1 V Z = 1 vzG 6.5J C1Yz - (�. 1 � - •oo \,( ■ • OC)'ZS�� O ��- (�Z Ct, O • Zae'r c0C, Lk-i,)03) .��A/, -� z 95(t) / �i vJ�L (el o4� w _ ze)-76:, 0 exo .();e, ax, (to.43-r1Z 1000 `t O . (p�� \0 IZczoo) sib 8" �i.. (2a5Kb-c%em ea44,-4, iu Zit \4, 'V \ Th4 (1 VI dt.4.474 4,o4.o 4cK te 0 J 11, la - 4. 6- Aii rri'-v 1*ACM4 - \.1(ml.�,,.> \A (S740 ')+ t. 7 (lor4do tcp %-r Io,ibeo = «,1 i I toocc OM WIN :MO (o' /Goo J l k c21 tc c F l \cal 4r -�+z Jam. elex . apo Nd0 , vb Cot\ (.00°,58670701.5.)--. .t8 G1„f7 11 z to.s aj� i . .• �-- - a.-at n-K 3 �� Cdgs Z�z` a; bby t4g1 Nu, '. N N •,g9.99t • • • • J ) t > 7 3 JJ li 3 8 t Proposed Tukwila Hotel Tukwila. Washington Project No. 6G- 9705003 Page 18 Fill material suitability for use in the preload fill (that portion of the site fills to be removed prior to building construction) will depend on the intended final use of the fill. If the fill will be spread out in parking lot areas, or reused for filling below other structures on the site, it should meet the recommendations for "structural fill" previously described. If the preload fill will be wasted from the site after preload compaction, the contractor may elect to use less select materials. Preload fill should be placed in uniform lifts of less than 18 inches loose thickness. and moderately compacted by construction equipment. In -place density tests should be conducted on the preload fill to evaluate density on the preload as compared to the 120 pcf assumed for design. All fill placed below finished floor elevation should meet gradation criteria and compaction requirements outlined above for structural fill. 5.7 ,mellow Foundations Ancillary structures such as dumpster enclosures and covered sidewalks may be supported on conventional foundations provided they are tolerable of long -term settlement of several inches. Continuous or column footings cast atop properly prepared foundation subgrades may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 1,000 psf. A one -third increase of these bearing pressures may be used for short-term dynamic loads such as wind and seismic forces. The actual foundation design should be determined by the project structural engineer. Minimum Required Embedment Depth A minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below the finished exterior grade is recommended for perimeter footings. All footings must be protected against weather damage both during and after construction, and must be supported by suitable bearing materials as recommended herein. Estimated Settlement It is estimated that the total settlement of foundation members founded within the above - mentioned soils may approach 1 inch with an additional '/ to 1 inch of long -term consolidation settlement possible over a 20 -year period. It is estimated that total post - construction settlement of a spread- footing - supported structure may approach 1' /2 inches. Differential settlement of foundations founded within the same soil type could approximate one -half of the total settlement. If possible, it is recommended that the foundation elements be placed within the same soil type to minimize the magnitude of possible differential settlement. It should be noted that differential settlement could approach the total settlement values if adjacent footings are founded on different bearing strata. During a large magnitude seismic event, settlements could increase as outlined in the Seismic Hazard Considerations section of this report. • oinAsti‘c°1)1 v-cis 41,■ L.)...)czt.CGAI ■47-61k-'/ FIA,C=44-7 T(zso - kA)-14.c2 c3100 + ocDo e goTICo.rn \Avut..X CPC) everd' 1 tHP Steel 3uitd :r.g Pr;ducts iSA Inc. 8 -36 Roof Deck 8.36 — a Towable F7eacttons ipif) 3auge Beating Length 1' 1 1,2' 2' 2 1,2' 3' 3 1 2' 4' 0.195 22 4t6 468 520 572 625 677 729 0.321 1007 1t03 _1213 1363 0.407 1663 1813 20 700 776 853 929 _1513 1005 1082 1158 Deflection 1495 1617 1739 1897 2088 2280 2472 18 1443 1568 1693 1818 1943 2C68 2193 143 2734 2909 3C84 3258 3436 3710 3985 16 2434 2608 2782 2957 3131 3305 3480 115 4350 4578 4806 5034 5262 5490 5786 1. The top value reflects the allowable reaction at the panel end supports. 2. The bottom value reflects the allowable reaction at the interior supports. 3. Vales are in pounds per linear foot. 4I 1 3/4' 218'35,8' O • 0 4 Welds • 7 Welds 36' 6' The B -36 profile has been "enhanced" via physical testing to give you the highest dia- phragm shear values of any of our prior B- series profiles. These values are also among the highest in the industry. Nestabfe sidelap condition available; coverage equals 35 1/4 ". 8 36— Section Proeerties Gauge Weight (psi) 1 J (In4) Sa (1n3) S- (1n3) 22 1.68 0.178 0.180 0.195 20 2.04 0.220 0.235 0.248 18 2.70 0.302 0.321 0.338 18 3.38 0.379 0.407 0.415 1. Section properties are based on minimum 38 ksi steel (Fy)• 8 36— Agowable Total (OL + LL) Uniform Load (psf) Span Gauge 5'0' 5'6' 6'0' 66' T0' 1 i T6' 8'6' I 9'0' 9'6' 10'0' 22 Stress 1'9 30 76 65 56 49 43 38 34 30 27 Deflection 93 70 54 42 34 28 23 19 16 14 12 20 Stress 143 118 99 85 73 64 58 49 44 40 36 Single Deflection 115 87 67 53 42 34 28 23 20 17 14 Span 18 Stress 195 161 136 115 100 87 78 68 60 54 49 Deflection 158 119 92 72 58 47 39 32 27 23 20 16 Stress 247 205 172 148 126 110 97 88 78 69 62 Deflection 199 149 115 90 72 59 49 40 34 29 25 22 Stress 119 98 82 70 60 53 48 41 37 33 30 Deflection 119 98 82 70 60 53 46 41 37 33 28 20 Stress 150 124 104 89 76 66 58 52 48 41 37 Double Deflection 150 ' 124 104 89 76 66 58 52 46 41 35 Span 18 Stress 204 169 142 121 104 91 80 71 63 57 51 Deflection 204 169 142 121 104 91 80 71 63 58 48 16 Stress 252 209 175 149 129. 112 99 87. 78 70 63 Deflection 252 209 175 149 129 112 99 87 78 70 80 22 Stress 148 122 103 88 78 68 58 51 48 41 37 Deflection 148 122 102 80 64 52 43 36 30 26 .22 20 Stress 1x37 •155 130 111 95 83 73 65 58 52 47 Triple Defection 187 155 126 99 79 65 53 44 37 32 27 Span t8 Stress 255 211 777 151 130 113 100 88 , 79 71 64 Deflection .55 211 173 136 109 89 73 61 51 44 37 16 Stress 315 261 219 187 161 140 123 109 97 87 79 Deflection 315 261 217 171 137 111 92 76 64 55 47 C Q -Max 3 System with B -36 Roof Deck 0 May 9 — 4•tc•,v We Reac!•ons p11) Gaugegearing Lergth • 1 t.2 2' 2 1 2'1 3- 3 1 2' 4' 22 416 1007 468 1103 520 1213 572 1363 ' 625 1513 677 1663 729 1813 20 700 1435 776 1617 353 1739 929 1997 1005 2C88 IC82 2230 1158 2472 18 1443 2734 1568 2909 1693 3084 1818 3258 1943 3436 2C68 3710 2193 3985 16 2434 4350 2608 4578 2782 4806 2957 5034 3131 5262 3305 5490 3480 5736 1. The top value reflects the a Iowabte reaction at the panel end supports. 2. The bottom value reflects the allowable reaction at the mtenor supports. 3. Values are in pounds cer ;rear foot. BHP combines 8.36 with our 16 gauge Shear Resistance Angle to offer a very cost effective roofing system which provides excellent resistance to lateral loads. O•Max 9 — Section P rooerties Gauge Weight 1 S. S- 5'6' (ps0 (Int) (1n3) (tn3) 22 168 0.178 0.180 0.195 20 2.04 0.220 0.235 0.246 18 2.70 0.302 0.321 0.336 16 3 38 0 379 0.407 0.415 1. Section properties are based on minimum 38 ksi steel (Fy)• O•',}a‘ S — Allowable Total IDL • LL1 Uniform Load rpsf) Span pan Cono t.on w Gauge 5'0" 5'6' 6'0' 6'6' T0' 7'6' 8'0' 8'6' 9'0' 9'6' 10'0' 22 6iress 109 90 76 65 56 49 - 43 38 34 30 27 I Oehectio- 93 _ 70 - 54 42 34 28 23 19 16 '14 12 20 Stress 143 118 99 85 73 64 56 49 44 40 36 Single Dellectic~ 115 87 67 53 42 34 28 23 20 17 14 Span 18 Stress 195 161 136 115 100 87 76 , 68 60 54 49 Oef!ec1rc- 158 119 92 72 58 47 39 32 27 23 20 16 Stress 247 205 172 146 126 110 97 86 76 69 62 Deflect :or , 199 149 115 90 72 59 49 40 34 29 25 22 Stress 119 r 98 82 70 60 53 46 41 37 .33 _ 30 Oal.ectior 119 - 98 82 70 60 53 46 41 37 33 28 20 Stress 150 124 104 89 76 66 58 , 52 46 41 37 Double Deflection 150 124 104 89 76 66 58 52 48 41 35 Span 18 Stress 204 169 142 121 104 91 80 71 63 57 _ 51 Deflection 204 169 142 _ 121 104 91 80 71 63 58 48 16 Stress 252 209 175 149 129 112 99 87 78 70 63 Deflection 252 209 17S 149 129 112 99 87 76 70 60 22 Stress 148 122 103 88 78 66 58 51 48 41 37 Deflection 148 122 102 80 64 52 43 38 30 26 22 20 Stress 187 155 130 111 95 83 73 65 58 52 47 Triple Ce!ecnc- 187 155 126 99 79 65 , 53 44 37 32 2? Span 18 Stress 255 211 177 151 130 113 100 _ 88 79 71 64 • Deflection 255 '211 173 136 109 89 73 61 51 44 37 16 Stress 315 261 219 187 181 140 _ 123 109 _ 97 67 79 r'' ' + 315 Z8t _ 217 _ 171 , 137 _ 111 _ 92 '6 84 , 55 47 1 .Z.•Aes -r . • . ._'e t..aet 7} JJ A l :, 2 Z, 560'1 uU I L. p‘ rp octet.. tec t `d © L.N.nro &.. Tau v�� c 2� ohs � � 0 Fes- `74! 4 `Zn ,� l'd4 4204 hawtt. c \ ?No. VT . _ 340 coo % 01'._. _ _ trz.s_ Jam. lP �T2 c:)‘(- J 50 �t-- cv A 1 `1= siDowz 4.400cD41 . CTA3tLez. Fto . art • vva-6 es ) PN 0 AZ-41` (y-,i (Q. , f I \ , _ 1•31 IrLifft: 00.+-vaiS AP') a, r•--ILv. ;TY 4ritvNI _ ,tz,s(ei(re-T---ocy (is (vezco, t)(is .cco 45 .Tudw-c) (.1 (..6.000(n) tot, 20c,ik iKraan • November 25. 199S Mr Evan Case ■ CSM Lodetn_. LLC 25 -5 Unnersit> .A%enue. West. Suite 150 Saint Paul. Minnesota 55114 -1024 Re: Addendum to Geotechnical Engineering Repoli Stormwater Detention Vault SeaTac Courtyard by Marriott 16038 N• est Valley Highway Tukwila. %Vashington ICA Project No. 066 -98189 D PEWIT' .A,S'1 1 `+ Jai �UN CO NOV 5 1998 SE&TAC COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT )11.22.58 Dear Mr. Casey: In accordance with your request. we are providing this Addendum to the Geotechnical Engineenng Report for the abt.o%e- referenced project. This Addendum is to address the stability of the foundation soils beneath the s :ormwater detention vault. Presently. excavation of the subsurface soils are in progress within the stormwater detention vault area. The subsurface soils at foundation depth consist of soft silty clay and clayey silt. Depending on the stability of the s::b;Trade soils at the stormwater detention vault. over - excavation and placement of a subbase rr.a;. be -e.,:utred. Preliminary observation suggests that two feet of subbase sod underlain b a geotextile provide adequate support for the structure. The subbase matenal should consist of crushed ro,: k u:, a maximum size of two inches. Supplemental recommendations may be required based on the stabs.:;> of the subsoils. If you have any questions. or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (2061 854-1330. DA:kcp Respectfully submitted. KRAZAN.& ASSOCIATES, INC. DEc s 7998 VVI(A oRks cc: John Ble> : K :eW u Construction DEAN ALEXANDER Professional Engineer RPE No. 0030508 PIZE4'IoZo It% OIbz of Y of TUKKWILA Offices Sen tag The %%estern United States 3 : :. :: -ih .A enue South • • Kent, w uhing :on 95042 • •13 3 i 3:4.1339 • • F3N 1 _: 3 i S:4 -t -: NOV 3 0 1998 MILES CONSULTING (425) 747.4421 SUITE 105 14400 BEL -RED ROAD BELLEVUE, WA 98007.3952 Attn: Joanna Spencer PE Public Works City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd 1100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Ref: Storm Water Vault CSM Hotel Tukwila 16038 W. Valley Hwy ti � X1:7 --, KIEWI CONSTRUCTION co. D NOV 231998 SEATAC COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 014-2258 20 Nov 1998 I have reviewed the various comments as relate to the design and the construction detailing of the subject storm water vault and have made the necessary changes to accomplish the construction of the structure to meet the expected conditions of the site. I have reviewed the vault top for adequacy for the Tukwila Fire Dept. ladder truck loading as suggested by Nick Olivas. The truck diagram has been added to the plan. The Reid Middleton Building Dept could not accurately comment as to whether the vault top preform, as there was no defined City loading at that time. The top will support the outriggers from the unit. The storm water vault will be constructed on a foot of quarry spalls or crushed concrete. This will be place as the excavation is finished and the opening has been inspected by the Soils Engr. Water -stops are called for in the bottom wall joint and at the sump's. A relief drain will be provided on either side of the vault. There will be no footing drains. And the information provided, suggested the parking lot would have had to flood before the vault was buoyant. There is no question now. There are no requirements for shoring. This is an item which is the responsibility of the Contractor and with the requirements of Construction Safety. The plans do not tell the Contractor how toN , constructed the work. Various questions involving the hydraulics of the storm water DEC 1 5 1998 vault are being handled by the Civil Engr. 2 sump's are shown as wm a construction requirement. E�I iLtpKv consultant. <gpOEIyLCd OMY oP TUMWMA NOV 3 0 1998 Plans are also returned to the Bldg Dept plan checking PPM-ow • /.I A w Awk • • .n If there are any question you may contact me at (425)747 -4421. It is probably important to install the structure to use as a settling basin to improve water quality. If there are minor . comments which you may have they may be added to the plans. cc Bldg Dept Kiewitt Co Reid Middleton A.R.H. ting Reid iddleton October 21, 1998 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 017 -01 Mr. Duane Griffin, Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 2 6 1998 Subject: Building Permit Plan Review - First Submittal CSM Hotel Stormwater Vault (MI98 -0162) Dear Mr. Griffin: We reviewed information for the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as adopted and amended by the City of Tukwila. The following cotments should be addressed: 1. The precast, prestressed concrete planks are considered deferred submittals, as defined in UBC Section 106.3.4.2, and should be listed on the drawings as such. In addition, a note should be provided stating that the Architect or Engineer of Record will review the deferred submittals and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and found to be in general conformance with the design of the vault. 2. Special inspection of the reinforcing steel and concrete is required per UBC Section 1701.5. In addition, a note should be provided on the drawings stating the items which require special inspections. 3. The calculation page qualifying the design of the detention vault applied the live load due to fire truck wheel loads. The load due to the fire truck stabilizer outrigger appears to have not been taken into consideration. Please provide supplemental calculations. The review comments listed above should be responded in itemized letter form. We recommend the permit applicant have the Structural Engineer of Record, Miles consulting, respond to the above comments and resubmit two copies of revised drawings and one copy of supplemental structural calculations directly to our office. A copy of this letter has been forwarded to the contractor, Anderson Richardson Hartley and Associates, Inc., for your convenience. Engineers Planners Surveyors Reid Middleton, Inc. 728134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741 -3800 FOX: 425 741 -3900 Mr. Duane Griffin, Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 October 21, 1998 File No. 24 -98- 022 - 017 -01 Page 2 Please note corrections or comments made during the review process do not relieve the project applicant or designer from compliance with requirements of codes, conditions of approval, and permit requirements; nor is the designer relieved of responsibility for a complete design m accordance with the laws of the state of Washington. This plan review check is for general compliance with the Uniform Building Code as it relates to the project. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call. Sincerely, iddleton, Inc. David B. Swanson, P.E Project Manager bjr\ wiNplanrevw \tukwila\98\t017r1.doc \wad cc: Dave Hartley, Anderson Richardson Hartley and Associates, Inc. Wade A. Damey Plan Review Engineer Reid iddleton December 3, 1998 File No. 24- 98- 022 - 017 -02 Mr. Duane Griffin, Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Building Permit Plan Review - Second Submittal CSM Hotel Stormwater Vault (MI98 -0162) Dear Mr. Griffin: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEC - 7 1998 PERMIT CENTER We reviewed information for the proposed project for compliance with the structural provisions of the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as amended and adopted by the City of Tukwila. It appears the applicant has responded successfully to our previous review letter, dated October 21, 1998. Therefore, we have no additional comments. Enclosed are the drawings, structural calculations, and correspondence from the engineer for your records. A copy of this letter has been forwarded to the contractor, Anderson Richardson Hartley and Associates, Inc., for your convenience. if you have any questions or require any additional clarification or information, please call. Sincerely, Middleton, Inc. Davi. B. Swanson, P.E Project Manager ade A. Dame Plan Review Engineer b jr\wl\planrevwVukw ila\98\t017r2.doc \wad cc: Dave Hartley, Anderson Richardson Hartley and Associates, Inc. Enginec,i Planners snraeyors Reid Middleton, Inc. 728134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741.3800 Fnr• 495 741.39!10 MILES CONSULTING (425) 747 -4421 SUITE 105 14400 BEL -RED ROAD BELLEVUE, WA 98007 -3952 TO: Reid Middleton 7,23 134th SW #200 Everett, WA 98204 ATTN. WAde Darney COPYTO: Tukwila PW & Rldl) Keiwi tt Co We are sending you Xt1 attached ❑ under separate cover via, the following: Structural Calc's with addeda or addition on end for the review of fire truck outrigger. Vault Plan These are transmitted: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL NOV 2 3 1998 DEVOELOPMEN'i GATE: 20 Nov 1998 JOB. M198-0162 ✓� RE: Storm Vault CSM Hotel Mail },Q For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Not approved Remarks :'t h e time of O As requested ❑ For review & comment O For filing O For bids due on , 19 ❑ For signature & return ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections review the C t did not have a re•uirement for the. The- sketch on the lans is advised b Cit of Tukwila. The vault to• will su as advised. the ort the arrangement Signed. Don Miles MILES CONSULTING (425) 747 -4421 SUITE 105 14400 BEL -RED ROAD BELLEVUE, WA 98007 -3952 MEMORANDUM 14 Sept 1998 To: Those Concerned Storm Water Vault Review From: Don Miles Miles Consulting Ref: CSM Hotel MI98 -0162 Tukwila, Washington Storm Water Vault In response to review comments, City of Tukwila permit review; • Item 2. The Storm Water advises that the details of the Civil Plans should be reviewed when constructing the vault so that inverts, elevations and pipe or orifice sizes comply with the final Civil Approval. Item 3414 The water table may raise to approximate elevation 20.78 prior to the storm water vault becoming buoyant. Assuming the finish grade over the vault is an average of 23. I do not have information advising of the ultimate level of the water table. It would be my recommendation that relief valve whose invert is elevation 20 and with a 10 section of perforated pipe in fabric, be place on either side of the vault at approximate centerline, if the water table exceeds that of 20.5 + / -. Vault should be back - filled with a free draining material. (Information enclosed. ) Scs 4A" s ''g'' Item 5. Water stops are added to the plan on the lower joint of the exterior wall. The plan review must understand that the vault is cast in place and there is no way to grout within a poured in placed joint. MEMORANDUM Seattle Sea -Tac Courtyard by Marriott KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DATE: 9/17/98 TO: Joanna Spencer City of Tukwila FROM: Joshua Stinson SUBJECT: CSM Hotel (Storm Water Detention Vault) Permit No.: MI98 -0162 Memo Dated August 31, 1998 Response to Question #6 on your memo to Anderson Richardson Hartley and Associates dated August 3, 1998. Question: Will dewatering be required during placement of the vault? If yes, where will the discharge from dewatering flow? Answer: No, dewatering will not be required during placement of the vault. As was verbally discussed between Joanna Spencer (City of Tukwila) and Joshua Stinson (KCC) on Sept. 17, 1998 questions 1 and 2 were addressed by Pacific Engineering Design in the form of a revised Civil Plan Sheet C -7 and Questions 3 -5 were addressed by Anderson Richardson Hartley in the form of engineering descriptions and calculations. Thank you for being aware that the answers to your memo were answered by three different parties on separate occasions. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact Dave Hartley at 425- 644 -9505. Thanks, Joshua Stinson cc: corr. to Nov.. v .h. wJ1'64 -1 0G.co . C. d r - PL.h...A. Cm ale a t w ".c .zcPea■.A. Vt. ?.off MW1A► t (213 # 1•0o) (.a+i1) 1gA?0`1' MIw lt.o* %, Co frh.1" JoLO re. Vt. t,st+ 1.004-.a1. Mat x 7t.f3 (.■01 /x` (ic c . (, R zs 7`t► 887,51, a y'•l_ , 4''a 4 tot3a 4s41t v . y30 • Got 4 1i3e ..... 6143.,. ATTAtch 'tAc" "Zt GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED TUKWILA HOTEL . WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PROJECT NO. 6G- 9705003 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following is a brief summary outline of the geotechnical conclusions and recommendations. This summary should be read in complete context with the accompanying report for proper interpretation. Subsurface Conditions • Giles' subsurface evaluation consisted of one augured boring to a depth of 661/2 feet below the existing ground surface, two Cone Penetrometer test probes extending to • depths of 50 and 60 feet below the existing ground surface, and seven test pits to a depth of up to 13 feet. • The explorations typically encountered surface top soil and sod to a depth of 6 inches. • Near - surface soils on the site typically consisted of sandy silt with variable gravel and construction/demolition debris content to depths of 3 feet to in excess of 13 feet interpreted to represent man- placed fill material. Native soils below the eastern half of the site and below the fill consisted of layered alluvial deposits of sands, silt, and clayey silt. The generalized soil profile observed included soft, sandy silt and soft clayey silt to 27 to 30 feet with firm (locally referred to as medium- dense) sand to 67 feet. • Groundwater was generally encountered at a depth of 15 feet. Building Foundations • The presence of significant thicknesses of near - surface soft and compressible soil layers and variable fills at the project site will require use of alternative foundation support options to reduce structural settlements. • Auger -cast piles could be used for foundation support. Pile capacities for 12- or 18- inch diameter piles are 40 and 60 tons each. • Preloading of the building footprint would provide an alternative to pile foundation - supported lower floor slabs. A preload height of 4 feet above the finish floor elevation left in place for a minimum of 60 days is recommended. It is estimated the preload would settle on the order of 1 to 3 inches. Long -term consolidation settlement (post construction) of the completed floor slab is estimated to be on the order of 1 inch or less over a 20 -year design life. • Existing fill and debris should be removed and replaced with structural fill in the building footprint prior to preloading. d31N9O .L1wa3d 8661 8 Z 9(lV dOO a3A13O3d Z")lQ 9jiEkJ azo •Lb3tid O W } J Li Ln Q ~ Z W -J 0)""<01-1- OT-C.7 d**C .-.:t O0Q J 0I.' I ct Qom= N O QZQOxtI- WOO WWwZm(1) - CY `t0�W WJQ w IOWQ 0.O =�cJ000 Ezo W. Z Y Q Z O 1=-ZX < JUQ O Q H 0 CC N j. r_ W W QNZ ,n w wwx-r ,� x r U Q N� W O O P2 O i P5 < ES Z Z Z W O Z O d Q = j J ZN }CD0LE 4LCC a200 Z LD l W Q, O O w, W p 0,0wc, `t>-wnQ. =OZ P: 0 ►- ti 0 H � 1-- CC I - - Z<w O Oo0Z C3 -- CYZO- O Cr0(YWWQV)E'-0 c u ] woUCrOi O1—tOOCLw WOW�OLL � • WZL.00OL+WQCC LL C]QO� W J% TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila Department of Public Works John W. Rants, Mayor NOTIFICATION OF UTILITY PERMIT ACTION Permit Center Public Works Engineering December 18, 1998 CSM Hotel Underground Storm Drainage Detention Vault 16038 West Valley Hwy Project No.: PRE97 -020 Permit Number: MI98 -0162 Contact Person: Don Miles Phone: (425)747 -4421 Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED ON DECEMBER 18, 1998: Storm Drainage PERMIT FEE 25.00 Two copies of the confirmed Utility Permit Application and plans are attached for inclusion in the permit file. JJS /jjs CF: Development File (with copy of application and plans) PW Utilities Inspector (with copy of application and plans). City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 17, 1998 Dave Hartley 14400 Bel-Red Road, #203 Bellevue, WA 98007 Dear Mr. Hartley: SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number M198 -0162 CSM Hotel - Stormwater Vault 16038 West Valley Hy This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your application for development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time, and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed review comments from the Public Works Department. At this time the Building Division, Fire Department and Planning Division have no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that four (4) complete sett of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your review does not require revised plans but requires additional reports or other documentation, please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 3671. Sincerely, Brenda Holt Permit Technician Enclosures File: MI98 -0162 C City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster; Director October 13, 1998 Dave Swanson, P.E. Reid Middleton 728 - 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 RE: Structural Review CSM Hotel - Stormwater Vault (M198 -0162) Dear Mr. Swanson: Please review the enclosed plans and documents for structural compliance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at.206- 431 - 36.71; Sincerely, Ottkia., Brenda Holt Permit Technician encl xc: M198 -0162 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 8, 1998 Mr. Dave Hartley Anderson, Richardson, Hartley & Associates, Inc. 14400 Bel -Red Road, Suite #203 Bellevue, Washington 98007 Dear Mr. Hartley: SUBJECT: LETTER OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Development Permit Application Number MI98 -0162 CSM Hotel - Stormwater Vault 16038 West Valley Hy This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on August 26, 1998, was determined to be incomplete. Before your permit application can begin the plan review process the enclosed requirements from the Public Works Department must be met. Also, please find enclosed an estimate of Building permit fees. This estimated does not include any Public Works permit fees that may be assessed. Before your application can be reviewed any further, the plan review fee in the amount of $410.15 must be received by the Permit Center. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your revision does not required revised plans but requires additional reports or other documentation please submit four (4) copies of each document. Mr. Dave Hartley September 8, 1998 Page 2 In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, r • Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: MI98 -0162 PRE97 -020 ---i , • _r CITYC JF TUKWILA — PUBIS .; WORKS DEPT. FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NUMBER: (206) 431 -3665 TITLE: TITLE: // i3/9(12 C/OV/72-,74).- cel" DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: PZ'O TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: COMMENTS /MESSAGE: jg,;„„ce-fe-gyi tip aixt,24.-gl- (42s) 22E; -33s& IF THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT CLEARLY RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL: C City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works Ross A. Eamst, P. E., Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: November 13, 1998 PROJECT NAME: CSM Hotel (Storm Water Detention Vault) PERMIT NUMBER: MI98 -0162 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1. Sheet C7 calls for a 48" diameter sump located at both ends of the vault, however the structural plan shows only one sump. Please add 2nd sump with bottom elevation of 13.90 to vault plan and show appropriate sump section on sheet 1 of 1. 2. Show wet stops at the sump sections. 3. Submit a letter from the Geotech Engineer addressing sub -base placement. Should the vault be supported on undisturbed native soils or is an additional sub -base required? If sub- base shall be used please specify required sub -grade and it's thickness on the plan. 4. Footing drains are required to remove groundwater that may enter the backfilled excavation. Please show footing drains on plans and where they tie to. Don Miles' memo of September 14, 1998 recommends relief valve, please add a note and show the valve on the plan. 5. Are there special requirements for shoring? If so, please provide requirements or instructions on the plans. 6. Applicant shall coordinate with Chief Nick Olivas, Tukwila Fire Department, at 206 -433- 1859 vault design loads to assure that the storm water shall support the weight of any fire department apparatus using the parking lot for access or operations. 7. The storm water vault may not be hydraulically correct. Coalescing plate oil water separator shall receive no more flow under max head than the greater of the design storm (1/2 of the 2 year flow) or the rated flow of the selected vault. 4.43 orifice under a head of 20.75 - 17.20 (3.55 feet of head) may exceed these criteria. PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS The Tukwila Public Works Department has completed it's review of the application materials you submitted on 9/ /�9? (Application # Kqc� -O0) z The attached comments or corrections must be addressed before we can recommend approval of your permit(s). Please be aware that you will probably receive comments and corrections from other City departments, as well. When you re- submit your corrected plans to the Permit Center for further review, your re- submittal must respond to the comments of all City departments at the same time. You will know when you have received the comments of all departments involved with your project, when you receive a "Correction Letter" from the City's Permit Coordinator. The Permit Center cannot accept your re- submittal until after you have received the Correction Letter reflecting all departmental comments and corrections. In the meantime, if you have questions regarding the attached Public Works De a ment comments and corrections, please contact Ja 4a' a 204 � 1133'O /7 ? . If you have other questions regarding the status of your permit application, please contact the Permit Center at 431 -3670. cc: Permit Center Michael Jenkins, Planning Division Gary Barnett PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: August 31, 1998 PROJECT NAME: CSM Hotel (Storm Water Detention Vault) PERMIT NO.: MI98 -0162 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179 if you have any questions regarding the following comments: 1. Please submit a revised storm drainage report with redesigned orifice control structure to use 2 orifices desirable (3 max.) per last meeting between Rick Tomkins, P.E., of Pacific Engineering, and Gary Barnett, PW Senior Development Engineer. 2. Pacific Engineering vault detail plan sheet C7 with redesigned orifice shall be part of your submittal. 3. Submit soils engineering design and recommendations addressing seasonal high ground water table, buoyancy statics calculations and subgrade preparation for the vault bottom foundation. Are footing drains required? If yes, where they tie to. 4. Is mira drain required along the outside walls of the vault and /or filter fabric around the footing drains? 5. Water stops are required. Bottom of the vault shall be grouted. 6. Will dewatering be required during placement of the vault? If yes, where will the discharge from dewatering flow? CITY OF TUKWILA Id: ACTP125 Keyword: UACT User: 1672 09/08/98 Activity Table Processing MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT Permit No: MI98 -0162 Occupant: CSM HOTEL Status: PENDING Address: 16038 WEST VALLEY HY Type: MISCPERM Vers: 9801 Screen: 06 Building and Demolition Permit Fees Only Temporary Bldg Fee(Y /N)..:N .00 Building Fee (Y /N) •Y 631.00 Other Bldg Fee (enter $): .00 Rack Storage Fee • .00 Plan Review Fee (Y /N) •Y 410.15 Total Building Fees: Other Plan Rev (enter $): .00 $ 1,045.65 Building Surcharge .(Y /N):Y 4.50 Demolition Fee (Y /N).:N .00 Other Demo Fee (enter$): .00, Work w/o a Permit (Y /N)..:N .00 Inspect After Hrs (hrs)..: .00 Reinspections (hrs) .00 Other Inspections (hrs)..: .00 Add'l Plan Review (hrs)..: .00 F7= Update, F2= Previous Line, F1= Screen Index, ESC = Cancel Update C City of Tukwila Fire Department Fire Department Review Control ##MI98 -0162 (510) John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief September 2,'1998 Re: CSM Hotel - 16038 West Valley Highway Dear Sir: The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 1. Stormwater vault shall support the weight of any fire . department apparatus using the parking lot for access or operations. Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or .violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. Yours truly, 510 The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau cc: TFD file ncd _ -AUG, 14. 1998 4:30PM F63S.Os . 7n1(ki 7) P 1.000 (8/47) REMOVE SIDE EDGES FIRST. THEN, CREASE ANO TEAR THIS STUB ALONG PERFORATION- NO, 6696 P. 2- ts -C(Z. 1 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES REGISTERED AS PROVIDED BY LAW AS CONST CONT 'GENERAL �• A▪ sezi.. `,41 EGIB � EXP'. l TYE eau zwaslotet92/1 AFFECTV$'A KIEWIT ' CONSTRUCTION 1000 KIEWIT PLAZA'• '' OMAHA NE 68131 GA Detach And Display Co dficur REGISTERED AS PROVIDED BY LAW ASI CONST CONT GENERAL • # EXP. DATE CCO1 ''KIEWICC179C5 02/12/1999 EFFECTIVE' :DATE 02/25/1983 KIEWIT .CONSTRUCTION 1000 KIEWITipLAZA' :. •. OMAHA NE4': ".68131 _:. • . ' '': ': Slgnamre Issued by DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES Please Remove And Sign Identification Card Before Placing In Billfold