Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E2000-004 - KOICHI YAGI - YAGI REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION
E2000 -004 4831 S. 136TH ST. • SIERRA PERMIT TRACKINO CHANGE REQUEST FORM To change any of the following information, please provide the current information identified in Sierra and the new /updated information. EXISTING INFORMATION NEW /UPDATED INFORMATION Parcel Number: 00°300 - Parcel Number: C2- r'Y) Parcel Address: 4 Cs. I Parcel Address: � (Y) 'C Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Zoning Classification: Watercourses: Slopes: Wetlands: Sewer District: Water District: Other Information: 1' Owner: Address: City: State: Zip: Zoning Classification: L-0 fns Watercourses: Slopes: Wetlands: �f_ 2� Sewer District: Water District: d 6c.a L,u;nci nofg c_Q_. cvl c LQ Gt.L144t sS St2E L2000 - D 10 12s_ao or- cu 2. U se, ty-) c¬cf�6r1 s Staff Requesting Change: Date: 7 2-q - O ( Information Updated in Sierra: Date: Staff Initials: Sierra Change Request Form 03/22/00 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Regulatory Branch K O )/6.1 l<-i7 /yl,r',�- -- ) ( Dear i , �cr DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SEATTLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 -3755 MAR 0 4 2001 Reference: c1C`%'r!'� --`: w ' We recently received a copy of the following information from C.:74,/ of 7i k c; v , 1 c/ concerning your proposed project ( (/77i ; ! -r,� - t he ?i2.5c 1.0 Lc� E, tla �) c/ S ). 0C) Determination of Nonsignificance ( ) Shoreline Permit ( ) Environmental Checklist ( ) Other: Your project may require authorization from the Corps of Engineers under the following regulations. ( ) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act ()() Section 404 of the Clean Water Act A Section 10 permit is required for construction work in or over any navigable waters of the United States. A Section 404 permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material in waters of the United States, including wetlands. The term "discharge of dredged material" means the addition, including redeposition, of dredged material, runoff from a contained land or water disposal area, and any addition, including redeposition, of excavated material. These activities can include grading, mechanized landclearing, ditching, channelization, and other excavation activities that destroy or degrade waters of the United States, including wetlands. The term "discharge of fill material" means the addition of any material used for the primary purpose of creating dry land or of changing the elevation of a water of the United States, including wetlands. The placement of pilings constitutes a discharge of fill material when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill material. The term wetlands means those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstance do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. If you have any questions concerning specific permit requirements, please contact 1;, -v ! z, r at (206) 764- (( 906. Enclosed for your use is our permit application materials. Enclosures _ r Sincerely, • /;.Ltt /1 _I (74:„,,,,,,e Ann R. Uhrich Application Review Section State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I e]rer- Y l (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requite me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on `..- a - 0 I the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 4$3 t '5, I319-tr\ so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number E2C—may I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or with' ourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. % Applicant or Pr/. i'ct Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me fk"rgg -- /g .4/ to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged tha he signed the same as ' /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED �N to before me this G' CHR /S7%`1t i -∎ .0\0N EX/3 .. 9le 01+ / �;Z g a�� lay .: N NOTARY PUB IC in d for the State of Washington %I • v NCO G �. ;. !residing at / I�1`` ,-c OF ' :11' My commission. expires on /� �, �0� day of /414/A1 / q , 2O,/ RECEIVE' FEB 13 Pill COMMUWETv DEVELOPMENT T CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE ON A TYPE 2 WETLAND PARCEL. APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED PERMISSION TO FILL & DEVELOP THE NORTHEAST CORNER (3.722 ,�S .F.) OF THE 17.776 S.F. WETLAND PARCEL-. APPL ICANT S PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE ENHANCEMENT OF THE REMAINDER OF-THE PARCEL UNDER AWETLAND,MITIGATION PLAN. PROPONENT: KOICHiI YAGI,,. LOCATION OF :,PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRES ADDRESS: 4831 S 136 ST,, PARCEL" NO: 000300 -0018 =' SEC /TWN /RNG:. LEAD AGENCY CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO E2000 -004 The City has determined that.,the proposal ,does not have+ a probable significant adverse e, impact `ion i the t envi ronment. An environmental, impact. state ment, JEIS):is`not:required " under _RCW 43.21e 030(2)(c) This decision was made after-review eof a completed environmental ;!: checklist and other i nfor,mation on file with - -the lead agencv.l This information is avaiavailable tothe public on ,_request. *. * *: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * *, *_ *, *_ * *- * * * * * * *_ * * * * * * * * ** * * ** *�* * * * * * * * ** This determination final and sighed this 'I day of J . Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila,', (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. February 1, 2001 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Owner Koichi Yagi 19473 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 Re: Contact Peter Yagi 14701 N.E. 20th Bellevue, WA 98007 VIA FAX 425 - 747 -5290 L2000 -010 (Yagi Reasonable Use Application) E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) at 4831 South 136th Gentlemen: Consultant J.S. Jones 3408 52nd Place N.E. Tacoma, WA 98422 VIA FAX 253 - 942 -7132 Steve Lancaster, Director On January 4th you submitted revised documentation to this office (in response to our December 15th letter). This documentation included revised plan sheets (Wetland Mitigation and Reasonable Use) as well as an updated SEPA checklist. We have reviewed your documentation and have the following comments. 1. SEPA Determination: We anticipate that a SEPA Determination will be issued on your project the week of February 5th. We will provide you with a copy of the Determination at that time. 2. Reasonable Use Application: Per Gary Schulz's November 28, 2000 comments (attached), the mitigation plan must include a written report providing information about the entire wetland system as well as an impact assessment and wetland function assessment. The wetland functions that would be lost and replaced must be identified. If you should have any questions about this requirement, please contact Gary at 206 -431 -3662. Staff and the Planning Commission will review the report in connection with your reasonable use application. Once this report information has been received, reviewed and approved, a hearing before the Planning Commission can be scheduled. 3. Additional Comments: As a courtesy, we are providing you with additional information. Although the items identified below are not required at this time, you may wish to review this information prior to applying for land altering and building permits. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Koichi Yagi Peter Yagi J.S. Jones February 1, 2001 Page 2 a. The final approved on -site mitigation plan must be implemented prior to the issuance of any land altering or building permits. b. Verification of all property lines must be provided via a professional land survey. In particular, the eastern boundary of the property (at the WSDOT right -of -way) must be clearly established. Next Step: We will continue processing your application upon our receipt of the revisions discussed in Item 2 above. Our ability to arrange a hearing date before the Planning Commission is dependent upon the timing of your resubmission, its contents and responsiveness to the technical review comments provided in this letter, as well as availability on the Commission's agenda. Given the nature and extent of the required revisions, we have tentatively scheduled a hearing date for March 22, 2001. However, in order to provide sufficient time for departmental reviews and submission to the Planning Commission, all revisions must be received in this office on or before February 16th, 2001. At the point your documentation has been approved for submission to the Planning Commission, you will be advised of the number of additional copies that will be required. Please contact me at 206 -431 -3663 with any questions. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Associate Planner Enclosures cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Mike Alderson, Assistant Fire Chief Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist Jill Mosqueda, Associate Engineer REASONABLE USE EXEMPTION SITE ADDRESS: 48XX SOUTH 136TH, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN - 4 2001 PERMIT CENTER LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tax Parcel 1D No.: 152304- 9018 -03 LOT 152304 BLK 18 POR OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 & GL 1 DAF -BEG 270 FT E OF SW COR GL 1 TH N 59 -49 -22 E 250.35 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN - 4 2001 PERMIT CENTER WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN SITE ADDRESS: 48XX SOUTH 136TH, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 SITE PLAN NORTH 0 90 m b 00 SCALE: 1" = 20' PLANT SCHEDULE Crsesma Nazo. admd&Nma Q9 Bha Sitka Spruce Picea aitchensia 23 3-4 ft Western Red C'rdnr Thuja plicata 23 3-4 ft PLANTING AND STAKING DETAIL GRASS SEEDING Om* Nav hmm6s 139 Pfs %Trier %Orm40dda lydo. 33% ION 90% %.01+ 0 19% 9999 tf% Id•do0 Pouf' 30% 90% 90% • adaaaw Yw00. sJddclaa tad swamies • Malabo 2,090 w P. w Oa last • ro0l yam of rad: gam • book. mid aWlNatoay yr. • Z O. Z P• E Q e 30 • City of Tukwila Quit • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Deborah Ritter '1312. Date: January 30, 2001 Re: MEMORANDUM E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) Yagi Reasonable Use 4831 South 136th Street, Tukwila Tax Parcel 000300 -0018 Project Description: This SEPA review is for the construction of a 1,738 square foot, two -story single - family house on a 17,776 square foot lot. The entire property is considered to be a Type 2 wetland, containing a deciduous forested area in the southern half and western quarter of the parcel. Under the City of Tukwila's Reasonable Use provisions in its Sensitive Areas Ordinance, the applicant has requested permission to fill and develop the northeast corner of this wetland parcel, an area approximately 3,722 square feet in size. The applicant's proposal includes the enhancement of the remainder of the parcel under a wetland mitigation plan. Agencies with Jurisdiction: Army Corps of Engineers. Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The site is relatively flat with a 2% maximum slope. The soil is Norma gravelly sandy loam. Approximately 345 cubic yards of cut and fill will be required for development of the northeast corner of the property. An erosion control plan in accordance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual will be employed during construction. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 E2000 -004 Yagi Reasonable Use January 30, 2001 Page 2 • Air • • Dust and exhaust emissions will be generated during construction, with watering as necessary to control dust. • Water The entire property is considered to be a Type 2 wetland, containing a deciduous forested area in the southern half and western quarter of the parcel. The east fork of Southgate Creek flows along the western perimeter of the property (a Type 2 watercourse corridor). This type of watercourse requires a standard buffer setback of 35 feet. Under the City of Tukwila's Reasonable Use provisions in its Sensitive Areas ordinance, the applicant has requested permission from the Planning Commission to fill and develop the northeast corner of the parcel (an area approximately 3,722 square feet in area). The applicant's proposal includes the enhancement of the remainder of the parcel under a wetland mitigation plan. The mitigation plan is subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development based on the criteria established in the Sensitive Areas ordinance. The project requires surface water treatment which has been approved by the Public Works Department and designed to 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual standards. At project completion, approximately 20% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces. Impervious surfaces will discharge at dispersion trenches with at least 25 feet of natural vegetation downstream. • Plants Site vegetation consists of a deciduous forested area (primarily Red Alder) in the southern half and western quarter of the parcel. Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass and creeping buttercup are found in the eastern three - quarters of the northern half of the parcel. A tree clearing permit will be required for removal of any tree (of 4 inches in diameter at breast height) located in a sensitive area. E2000 -004 Yagi Reasonable Use January 30, 2001 Page 3 • Animals • No endangered or threatened wildlife species have been identified on the site. Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout use the Lower Duwamish Waterway for passage, rearing and adjustment to fresh water. Bald Eagles are present in flyovers. The site is located in the Pacific Flyway migration route. Energy /Natural Resources Lighting and heating for a single - family house. Environmental Health Noise generated by heavy equipment will occur during construction. The hours of construction will comply with the City's noise ordinance. Land /Shoreline Use The site is zoned Low Density Residential and is currently undeveloped. It is bordered on the east by Interstate 5, on the north by South 136th Street and on the west by the east fork of Southgate Creek. Residential properties are located to the north, west and south. • Housing The proposal is for the construction of one single - family house on an undeveloped parcel. • Aesthetics • The size of the proposed house is consistent with other existing single - family structures in the area. Light and Glare N/A Recreation N/A E2000 -004 Yagi Reasonable Use January 30, 2001 Page 4 • Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. Transportation The site is accessed from South 132nd Street and 33rd Avenue South. There will be no significant traffic impacts to streets and intersections in the vicinity. The nearest Metro Transit bus stop is located on Macadam Road South at 48th Avenue South. • Public Services No significant increase in public services is expected. • Utilities Electricity, natural gas, water and sanitary sewer services are available to the site. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance. From: Jill Mosqueda To: Deborah Ritter Date: 1/22/01 3:30PM Subject: E2000 -004 Here are the comments. One change is because I made an error in the first comments. Other changes are because applicant didn't include all the suggestions! CC: Jill Mosqueda CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: Yagi (Sumpter) Reasonable Use File #: E2000 -004 SEPA Date: 01.22.01 Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. Reviewer comments from Ryan Partee and J. Mosqueda. Section Comment Initials A.6. The work window is more likely July1 -Sept. 30. WDFW will condition the permit. RP A. 11. The existing stream is Southgate Creek RP B.3.a.1) The unnamed seasonal stream is the east fork of Southgate Creek. RP B.3.a.2 Gilliam should be Southgate. This is the PW reviewer error UM B.3.d During and following construction, use current KCSWDM for erosion prevention and sediment control UM B.5.a. Add birds and fish NEAR the site: Hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, salmon, trout, shellfish RP B.7.a.1 Spill prevention, control, and containment per King County pollution control manual UM Q /jilt /projects /5FR /yogi /E2000 -004 SEPA COMM #2 1 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Schulz FROM: Deb Ritter DATE: January 4, 2001 RE: L2000 -010 (Yagi Reasonable Use Application) E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) at 4831 South 136th The applicant resubmitted documentation today in response to my December 15th letter (attached). I have reviewed the material and have the following comments: 1. The applicant has not responded to all of your requirements for a conceptual mitigation plan (listed in your November 28th memo). Among other things, you asked that the plan be prepared "in a report format to provide information about the entire wetland system and include an impact assessment and wetland function assessment." You also asked that the applicant identify "the wetland functions that would be lost and replaced by the on -site mitigation ". 2. The applicant has not produced a survey to verify the eastern property line and adjacent WSDOT right -of -way. Until the location of the eastern property line is documented, the size of the proposed impact area cannot be adequately established. Although my rough calculations show an impact area which is less than 1 /10th of an acre (4,261 square feet), it is greater than the applicants estimate of 3,722 square feet. 3. The Mitigation Plan (Sheet 1 of 2) carries the following statement: "No significant trees to be removed from impact area." However, to document this, the survey should also identify any significant trees located in or near the proposed impact area. The applicant has decided to maintain the required 20 foot front yard setback. As a result, a variance for a reduction in that setback has not been requested. Please provide me with your written comments. I have also routed this information to Jill Mosqueda and Ryan Partee. In particular they will evaluate the applicant's proposal for dispersion trenches. cc: Jack Pace (w /attachments) Jill Mosqueda (w /attachments under separate cover) Ryan Partee (w /attachments under separate cover) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Gity of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 15, 2000 Owner Contact Consultant Koichi Yagi Peter Yagi J.S. Jones 19473 Military Road South 14701 N.E. 20th 3408 52nd Place N.E. SeaTac, WA 98188 Bellevue, WA 98007 Tacoma, WA 98422 Re: L2000 -010 (Yagi Reasonable Use Application) E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) at 4831 South 136th Gentlemen: On October 25th you submitted revised documentation to this office (in response to our September 7th letter). This documentation included a SEPA checklist, a narrative response to the Reasonable Use Criteria and plan sheet showing the location of the proposed improvements. We have reviewed your documentation and have the following comments. 1. SEPA Determination: SEPA Comments dated November 15th from the Public Works Department and November 28th from Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist, are attached. Please make the necessary corrections and resubmit four signed and dated copies of the completed, revised checklist. PLEASE NOTE: The identified deficiencies in your SEPA checklist must be addressed and corrected whether or not you elect to further revise your reasonable use documentation. 2. Reasonable Use Application: Staff believes that an argument could be made in support of a reasonable use exception, so long as certain on -site impacts are reduced. In your recent submittal you provided a smaller footprint for the proposed residence with the stated intention to plant native conifers in place of existing blackberry. However, these changes alone do not adequately reduce the on -site impacts to the wetland. Staff has identified additional, specific ways to reduce on -site impacts, focusing on the location of the proposed house and related site design issues (please see the November 28th comments from Gary Schulz, attached). The following revisions will be necessary in order to obtain staffs recommendation to the Planning Commission for a reasonable use exception: a. Limit size of the total project impacts (i.e., the proposed residence and all associated fill) to 4,356 square feet. By limiting the impacts to 1 /10th of an acre or less, a Corps permit can be avoided. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Koichi Yagi Peter Yagi J.S. Jones December 15, 2000 Page 2 b. Relocation of the proposed improvements to the northeastern portion of the site (which was previously cleared and is the most disturbed area of the site). In order to further reduce wetland impacts, site development should be concentrated in this area. Additionally, a 35 -foot wide buffer must also be maintained from the east fork of Southgate Creek, which is located along or adjacent to the western perimeter of the site. Toward that end, the following steps should be taken: Submit an application for a variance from the required 20 -foot front setback. Upon review and approval of your variance documentation, it can be presented to the Planning Commission in conjunction with your Reasonable Use Exception request. Please see the attached variance application packet regarding the required documentation and fee amount. ii. The proposed side setback at the east side of the residence should be reduced. The minimum required side setback is five feet in width. Verification of all property lines should be provided via a professional land survey. In particular, the eastern boundary of the property (at the WSDOT right -of -way) must be clearly established. c. Provide a conceptual mitigation plan (see comments from Gary Schulz dated November 28, 2000). d. Depending upon the final, approved location of the proposed improvements, a number of existing trees may have to be removed. In that event, you may be required to include or incorporate Tree Permit requirements in the conceptual mitigation plan. PLEASE NOTE: All revisions to the SEPA checklist and Reasonable Use application must be submitted and approved before the public hearing for a reasonable use exception can be scheduled. If you elect not to make revisions to your Reasonable Use application materials, staff will recommend that your request be denied. However, as stated above, identified deficiencies in your SEPA checklist must be addressed and corrected whether or not you elect to further revise your reasonable use documentation. 3. Additional Comments: As a courtesy, we are providing you with additional information. Although the items identified below are not required at this time, you may wish to obtain these items prior to applying for land altering and building permits. a. The final approved on -site mitigation plan must be in place prior to the issuance of any land altering or building permits. • • Koichi Yagi Peter Yagi J.S. Jones December 15, 2000 Page 3 b. Depending upon the final, approved location of the proposed improvements, a number of existing trees may have to be removed. If so, a Tree Permit will be required prior to the issuance of any land altering or building permits (TMC 18.54 attached). c. As stated in Public Works' SEPA comments dated November 15th, the City of Tukwila will not allow surface water from the driveway and house to flow directly into the east fork of Southgate Creek. In connection with any land altering and building permits, the applicant will be required to meet the temporary erosion sedimentation control methods and surface water drainage requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. These requirements may include on -site detention. d. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by Water District #125 and be fully in service prior to the start of construction. By line of vehicular travel, a fire hydrant must be no further than 250 feet from a structure with flow of 1000 GPM. If water lines are to be extended to accommodate fire hydrants, please contact Water District #125 regarding associated fees. All water lines must meet Tukwila Public Works Department standards. Next Step: We will continue processing your application upon our receipt of the revisions discussed in Items 1 and 2 above. Our ability to arrange a hearing date before the Planning Commission is dependent upon the timing of your resubmission, its contents and responsiveness to the technical review comments provided in this letter, as well as availability on the Commission's agenda. Given the nature and extent of the required revisions, we have tentatively scheduled a hearing date for February 22, 2001. However, in order to provide sufficient time for departmental reviews and submission to the Planning Commission, all revisions must be received in this office on or before January 5, 2001. At the point your documentation has been approved for submission to the Planning Commission, you will be advised of the number of additional copies that will be required. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3663 with any questions. Sincerely, --1000\r-LJA Deborah Ritter Associate Planner Enclosures • Koichi Yagi Peter Yagi J.S. Jones December 15, 2000 Page 4 cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Mike Alderson, Assistant Fire Chief Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: Yagi (Sumpter) Reasonable Use File #: L2000 -010 seasonable Use E2000 -004 SEPA . Date: 11.15.00 Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda, Reviewer comments from Ryan Partee and J. Mosqueda. Section Comment Initials A.6. What is proposed window of construction? RP A. 11. Please provide a complete description including the proposed uses and size. RP A. 13. A wetland site with east fork of Southgate Creek is environmentally sensitive RP, UM B.1.e. Cross section shows fill RP, UM B.1.f. The flow is year -round RP B.1.f. Need erosion PREVENTION and sediment control per 1998 KCSWDM. Silt fence is ineffective and should be used as a last resort effort to retain any soils that got past the erosion PREVENTION measures. RP, UM B.3.a.1) Plan states the roof drains to the wetland. East fork of Southgate Creek flows year- round. Type 2; flows to the Duwamish. The City will not allow the roof drains to flow directly into Southgate Creek. Applicant should refer to the 1998 KCSWDM. RP, UM B.3.a.2) Answer should be YES, E. fork of Gilliam Creek lies 68 feet to the west of the proposed house. RP B.3.a.3) The plans show fill material. RP, UM Q/j i II/pro jects/5FR/yagi/L2000-010 1 Section Comment Initials B.3.a.6) Roof drains to the wetland. Storm water runoff from impervious surface is not discussed. Surface wtaer runoff plan per the 1998 KCSWDM. RP, UM B.3.c.1) The City will not allow surface water from the driveway and house to flow directly into Southgate Creek. The Applicant should provide surface water drainage per the 1998 KCSWDM.- At a minimum the Applicant should discuss infiltration. If the site will not infiltrate, then detention may be required per the manual. . RP, UM B.3.d. Erosion PREVENTION and sediment control plan per 1998 KCSWDM RP, UM B.4.a. Plant list needs to add shrubs, grass, wet soil plants, other RP B.4.c. Need endangered species NEAR the site. RP B.4.d. What about the buffer area? RP, UM B.5.a. Add birds and fish NEAR the site: Hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, salmon, trout, shellfish RP B.5.b. Listed species near this site include Chinook salmon, bull trout, bald eagle RP B.5.d. Erosion PREVENTION and sediment control plan per 1998 KCSWDM RP, UM B.7.a. Diesel from heavy equipment as well as possible hydraulic fluid. Provide spill control and containment plan per the King County Pollution Control Manual. RP, UM 7.a.1) Emergency Spill response kit • RP 7.a.2) Stop work if spill occurs to facilitate cleanup RP 7.b.1) Some transit, light rail E4 route in I -5 right -of -way. RP 7.b.2) Should state whether or not there will be weekend work including heavy equipment and hammering. RP Q /jill /projects /5FR /yagi /L2000 -010 2 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Deborah Ritter, Associate Planner FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist ,4-6) DATE: November 28, 2000 RE: Yagi Reasonable Use #L2000 -010, & SEPA #E2000 -004. I have reviewed the submittal date - stamped 10/25/00 and this includes a revised SEPA checklist. I have the following comments and questions related to the design of a new home and related potential wetland impacts. The application for a reasonable use exception has used the criteria in support of the current proposal. SEPA Checklist 1) The application has reduced the house size from 2,252 square feet to 1,738 square feet. However, the entire impact area of 5,698 square feet may be considered impervious after development for this house. It is assumed that the 15 -foot perimeter area around the house would be drained and filled. The percent impervious will likely be more than 2,098 square feet (13% of the site, page 4 of SEPA Checklist) because site construction would likely require wetland soil removal and replacement with structural material. 2) There is no answer given for SEPA 3. D. on page 7. One measure that would reduce water - related impacts is to condition the timing of construction to the dry season. Site Design 1) Given the size of the proposed house (1,738 square feet), it seems very feasible to limit the wetland fill to a 1/10 acre and avoid the US Army Corps of Engineers permit process. This would lower the proposed fill/impact from 5,698 square feet to 4,356 square feet. Potential ways to lower the fill/impact are: A. Reduce the front yard setback of 20 feet but still maintain adequate driveway length, B. Shift the house closer to the eastern property boundary as there is a total distance of 35 feet shown on the site plan, C. Reduce the 15- foot perimeter "lawn" to one area for use as a front yard or backyard, D. Verify by professional land survey the location of the WSDOT right -of -way fence relative to the east property boundary. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Yagi Memo November 28, 2000 Page 2 2) The northeast portion of the property near the street was previously cleared and is the most disturbed. In order to reduce impacts, this should be the area to develop as much as possible. 3) The timing of mitigation, if on -site as proposed, should be completed prior to the issuance of any land altering or building permits. There will need to be an appropriate conceptual mitigation plan submitted prior to the Reasonable Use Exception Hearing. This plan will be prepared in a report format to provide information about the entire wetland system and include an impact assessment and wetland functional assessment. The wetland functions that would be lost and replaced by the on -site mitigation need to be identified as part of the exception process. 4) A tree permit would also be necessary and this permit process would also be used to assess relevant wetland impact and the proposed mitigation. It is likely that the tree permit requirements would be included in the mitigation plan. Summary: • Avoid Corps permit by reducing wetland fill to 4,356 square feet. • Relocate and possibly reconfigure house design to fit closer to the street and east boundary. • Provide conceptual mitigation plan to demonstrate that wetland functions would be replaced. This plan would need to be prepared, prior to the hearing, as part of staff's recommendation. Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Jack Pace, Planning Manager 40). Gity of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Deborah Ritter, Associate Planner FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist DATE: November 28, 2000 RE: Yagi Reasonable Use #L2000 -010, & SEPA #E2000 -004. I have reviewed the submittal date - stamped 10/25/00 and this includes a revised SEPA checklist. I have the following comments and questions related to the design of a new home and related potential wetland impacts. The application for a reasonable use exception has used the criteria in support of the current proposal. SEPA Checklist 1) The application has reduced the house size from 2,252 square feet to 1,738 square feet. However, the entire impact area of 5,698 square feet may be considered impervious after development for this house. It is assumed that the 15 -foot perimeter area around the house would be drained and filled. The percent impervious will likely be more than 2,098 square feet (13% of the site, page 4 of SEPA Checklist) because site construction would likely require wetland soil removal and replacement with structural material. 2) There is no answer given for SEPA 3. D. on page 7. One measure that would reduce water - related impacts is to condition the timing of construction to the dry season. Site Design 1) Given the size of the proposed house (1,738 square feet), it seems very feasible to limit the wetland fill to a 1/10 acre and avoid the US Army Corps of Engineers permit process. This would lower the proposed fill/impact from 5,698 square feet to 4,356 square feet. Potential ways to lower the fill/impact are: A. Reduce the front yard setback of 20 feet but still maintain adequate driveway length, B. Shift the house closer to the eastern property boundary as there is a total distance of 35 feet shown on the site plan, C. Reduce the 15- foot perimeter "lawn" to one area for use as a front yard or backyard, D. Verify by professional land survey the location of the WSDOT right -of -way fence relative to the east property boundary. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Yagi Memo November 28, 2000 Page 2 The northeast portion of the property near the street was previously cleared and is the most disturbed. In order to reduce impacts, this should be the area to develop as much as possible. The timing of mitigation, if on -site as proposed, should be completed prior to the issuance of any land altering or building permits. There will need to be an appropriate conceptual mitigation plan submitted prior to the Reasonable Use Exception Hearing. This plan will be prepared in a report format to provide information about the entire wetland system and include an impact assessment and wetland functional assessment. The wetland functions that would be lost and replaced by the on -site mitigation need to be identified as part of the exception process. A tree permit would also be necessary and this permit process would also be used to assess relevant wetland impact and the proposed mitigation. It is likely that the tree permit requirements would be included in the mitigation plan. Summary: • Avoid Corps permit by reducing wetland fill to 4,356 square feet. • Relocate and possibly reconfigure house design to fit closer to the street and east boundary. • Provide conceptual mitigation plan to demonstrate that wetland functions would be replaced. This plan would need to be prepared, prior to the hearing, as part of staff's recommendation. Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Jack Pace, Planning Manager • • CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: Yagi (Sumpter) Reasonable Use File #: L2000 -010 seasonable Use E2000 -004 SEPA Date: 11.15.00 Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda Reviewer comments from Ryan Partee and J. Mosqueda. Section Comment Initials A.6. What is proposed window of construction? RP A. 11. Please provide a complete description including the proposed uses and size. RP A. 13. A wetland site with east fork of Southgate Creek is environmentally sensitive RP, UM B.1.e. Cross section shows fill RP, UM B.1.f. The flow is year -round RP B.1.f. Need erosion PREVENTION and sediment control per 1998 KCSWDM. Silt fence is ineffective and should be used as a last resort effort to retain any soils that got past the erosion PREVENTION measures. RP, UM B.3.a.1) Plan states the roof drains to the wetland. East fork of Southgate Creek flows year- round. Type 2; flows to the Duwamish. The City will not allow the roof drains to flow directly into Southgate Creek. Applicant should refer to the 1998 KCSWDM. RP, UM B.3.a.2) Answer should be YES, E. fork of Gilliam Creek lies 68 feet to the west of the proposed house. RP B.3.a.3) The plans show fill material. RP, UM Q/jill/pro jects /SFR /yogi /L2000 -010 1 Section Comment Initials B.3.a.6) Roof drains to the wetland. Storm water runoff from impervious surface is not discussed. Surface wtaer runoff plan per the 1998 KCSWDM. RP, UM B.3.c.1) The City will not allow surface water from the driveway and house to flow directly into Southgate Creek. The Applicant should provide surface water drainage per the 1998 KCSWDM. At a minimum the Applicant should discuss infiltration. If the site will not infiltrate, then detention may be required per the manual. RP, UM B.3.d. Erosion PREVENTION and sediment control plan per 1998 KCSWDM RP, UM B.4.a. Plant list needs to add shrubs, grass, wet soil plants, other RP B.4.c. Need endangered species NEAR the site. RP B.4.d. What about the buffer area? RP, UM B.5.a. Add birds and fish NEAR the site: Hawks, heron, eagle, songbirds, salmon, trout, shellfish RP B.5.b. Listed species near this site include Chinook salmon, bull trout, bald eagle RP B.5.d. Erosion PREVENTION and sediment control plan per 1998 KCSWDM RP, UM B.7.a. Diesel from heavy equipment as well as possible hydraulic fluid. Provide spill control and containment plan per the King County Pollution Control Manual. RP, UM 7.a.1) Emergency Spill response kit f RP 7.a.2) Stop work if spill occurs to facilitate cleanup RP 7.b.1) Some transit, light rail E4 route in I -5 right -of -way. RP 7.b.2) Should state whether or not there will be weekend work including heavy equipment and hammering. RP Q /jilt /pro jects /SFR /yogi /L2000 -010 FROM : DPFINANCIAL October 31, 2000 Deb Ritter City of Tukwila PHONE NO. : 4257475290 RE: L2000 -010 E2000 -004 at 4831 South 146th Oct. 31 2000 03:29PM P1 RECEIVED OCT 31 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please change the agent on this case from D.J. Sumpter to Peter Yagi at 14701 NE 20th, Bellevue, WA 98007 phone (425) 747 -5090 and address all correspondence there. Would also appreciate if you could keep me apprised of any further information or questions you may have. Sinc eter Yagi • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development September 7, 2000 Owner Koichi Yagi 19473 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 Re: Agent Consultant D. J. Sumpter J.S. Jones 718 S.W. Dash Point Road 3408 52nd Place N.E. Federal Way, WA 98023 Tacoma, WA 98422 L2000 -010 (Sumpter Reasonable Use Application) E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) at 4831 South 136th Gentlemen: Steve Lancaster, Director On June 13, 2000 we issued our technical review comments on the above - referenced files. A follow -up meeting was held on June 26, 2000 attended by all of you, Deborah Ritter and myself. In our June 13th letter and during the June 26th meeting, you were advised that the Planning Division staff cannot support your request ,for a Reasonable Use Exception. This is because your submittal does not address the required Reasonable Use Exception criteria. As a result, we have recommended that you do one of the following: a) revise or amend your submittal to meet the Reasonable Use criteria; b) provide a letter saying that you do not wish to revise or amend your submittal; or c) withdraw both applications. To date, you have not indicated how you wish to proceed. This is to notify you that your applications for a SEPA Determination and Reasonable Use Exception will be terminated and your files closed if you do not provide the requested information to the City of Tukwila by October 31, 2000. In the event that you formally decline to revise or amend your submittal, staff will make a recommendation to the Planning Commission that your Reasonable Use Exception request be denied. Sincerely, • Jack Pace Planning Manager Enclosures cc: Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Mike Alderson, Assistant Fire Chief Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 June 13, 2000 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Owner Koichi Yagi 19473 Military Road South SeaTac, WA 98188 Re: Agent D. J. Sumpter 718 S.W. Dash Point Road Federal Way, WA 98023 VIA FAX 253 - 941 -3460 L2000 -010 (Sumpter Reasonable Use Application) E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) at 4831 South 136th Gentlemen: Steve Lancaster, Director We have completed our review of your Reasonable Use Exception and SEPA applications. We have the following comments. REASONABLE USE APPLICATION: You have indicated in your application materials that 100% of the project site is comprised of a wetland. Based upon our review of these materials, Planning Division staff cannot support your request for a Reasonable Use Exception. Your written responses do not address the requirements of the Reasonable Use Exception criteria (TMC 18.45.115(C)). If you choose to revise or amend your submittal, you must dearly show how you meet the criteria. We have enclosed a copy of TMC Chapter 18.45 (Sensitive Areas Overlay) for your reference. As a result, we encourage you to review the criteria again and revise or amend your submittal. Upon submission of your revisions, we will continue our review. However, if you do not wish to submit revisions, and your application materials remain unchanged, staff will make a recommendation to the Planning Commission that your Reasonable Use Exception request be denied. SEPA APPLICATION: We have no additional comments at this time. However, any revisions you make in your proposal for a Reasonable Use Exception must also be reflected in the SEPA checklist. Accordingly, a SEPA determination must be delayed pending your response to the Reasonable Use criteria. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Koichi Yagi D.J. Sumpter June 13, 2000 Page 2 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Although the following information is not required at this time, it will be required prior to proceeding with land altering and building permit applications. Comments from Public Works: 1. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate the source of fill. 2. You will be required to comply with the temporary erosion sedimentation control methods provided in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 3. You will be required to comply with the runoff standards for small sites as provided in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. You will be required to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual for small sites. Comment from Fire Department: 5. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by Water District #125 and fully in service prior to the start of construction. By line of vehicular travel, a fire hydrant must be no further than 250 feet from a structure with flow of 1000 GPM. If water lines are to be extended to accommodate fire hydrants, please contact Water District #125 regarding associated fees. All water lines must meet Tukwila Public Works Department standards. SUMMARY: If you wish to your provide revisions to your Reasonable Use Exception documentation, please forward the materials, in one package, to my attention. Upon receipt of these items, we will continue processing your SEPA and Reasonable Use applications. Altematively, if you do not wish to revise your responses and do not have any additional documentation, please state this fact in writing and forward to my attention as soon as possible. Due to the application deficiencies stated above and to public notice requirements, a public hearing on the matter cannot be held on June 22, 2000. Our ability to arrange for a hearing date before the Planning • • Koichi Yagi D.J. Sumpter June 13, 2000 Page 3 Commission is dependent upon the timing of your resubmission, its contents and responsiveness to the criteria as well as availability on the Commission's agenda. Sincerely, 'be/rocc&k Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Mike Alderson, Assistant Fire Chief Jack Pace, Planning Manager Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED MAY 12, 2000 The following application has been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: LOCATION: FILE NUMBERS: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: D. J. Sumpter 4831 South 136th Street, Tukwila E2000 -004 (SEPA Determination) L2000 -010 (Reasonable Use Exception) To obtain a reasonable use exception in order to construct a 2,252 s.f. single - family home. The 15,665 s.f. site is undeveloped and currently contains a wetland. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Land Altering Permit, City of Tukwila Building Permit, City of Tukwila These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 26, 2000. If you have questions about this proposal contact Deborah Ritter, the Planner in charge of this file at (206) 431 -3663. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on 5- I Z " 00 the Public. Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 4%31 S.• t 3 (v}^- so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number. E1.000 0c(1- v-' L-2oQ -010. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1 __ day of Ma_3 go ° a NOTARY PUBLIC in residing at My commission e rxpires on d for the State of Washington CO VN. 3- ;L= vv`�. May 8, 2000 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Mr. D.J. Sumpter 718 S.W. Dash Point Road Federal Way, Washington 98023 Re: Reasonable Use Exception (L2000 -010) SEPA Environmental Review (E2000 -004) at 4831 South 136th Street, Tukwila Dear Mr. Sumpter: Your application for a Reasonable Use Exception and SEPA Determination on the above - referenced file have been found to be complete as of May 8, 2000 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Essentially, this means that you have supplied the required items listed on the application checklists for these types of permits. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. We are enclosing a laminated copy of the "Notice of Application" to post on that notice board. Per our conversation, you will arrange to post the Notice on May 12, 2000. This is the same day that we will be mailing public notice to property owners, tenants and businesses within 500 feet of the project. After you have posted the laminated Notice on the sign, you must return the signed and notarized "Affidavit of Installation and Posting" to me. We are about to commence our technical review process, which is the next phase in the processing of your applications. Although your applications have been found to be "complete ", the items you supplied may have to be revised or amended. The City may also require that you submit additional plans and information to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City and to finalize the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner cc: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist Mike Alderson, Assistant Fire Chief Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplana,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows: I . I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its a loyees, agents, engineers contractors or o er represen tiv s e right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at t-0113 / S r 13 (p -j 5T. f< (, rt for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at 71,1 (city), _(state), on M I f (S I ze' C.' D . prE (Print Name) Ald ktPT_ lid), (Address) FE )ei L t`7 f t �-t o z 3 Zc) -t (Phone Number) �" ` (Signs On this day personally appeared before me ,k w' i� J s •2{ to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/s signed the same as hi4/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND 'B 'ORE ME O THIS 1 DAY OF tU] i s \� s�, t t CR/w, u: L,../74.--1--.---., • ��d i Q' • ,�. +; •, to I O ARY PUB IC in and for the tare of hington / �: U NOTAR y y to residing ate, _� v� i / • PUBLIC i My Commission expires on ^9 — �' Itl‘1/›...... S 9 0i i 9 ' GAAPPHA }nLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at %1 k)7 LA- (city), (-0451-1,1 K1 PM) V (state), on ivl *12e Ste, Z )J..s,t�� (Print Name) 1 Yf, 0 l AJF - z6 6e to c (Address) -r?(- '���s� (Phone Number) (Signature) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplana,ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRON. REVIEW (P -SEPA) APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 4/831 1560-11( S`ji -' i x(1467 L* RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWII n MAY 0 1 2000 PERMIT CENTER per. "Q # cycs0 3 o -o 18 000W y Quarter: SE Section: /5 Township: Z2 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and '. • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: D T Address: Phone: '7,0Ta �l 1 N ' 7 3 L/ - FAX: Z6 3— �!yl - 3 y Ce 17c2 KP pee) pt ,�,r4- ttil)“1 ` *51023 Date: G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DGC, 17/08/99 1 FOR STAFF USE ONL Y Planner: ©F6 -1111 4L t/ e File Number: L ZOOO - 06 Application Complete (Date: 5,,c6...0-0) Project File Number: L Application Incomplete (Date:3 , 22_ Other File Numbers: L _ Z491,0 - Or 0 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 4/831 1560-11( S`ji -' i x(1467 L* RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWII n MAY 0 1 2000 PERMIT CENTER per. "Q # cycs0 3 o -o 18 000W y Quarter: SE Section: /5 Township: Z2 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and '. • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: D T Address: Phone: '7,0Ta �l 1 N ' 7 3 L/ - FAX: Z6 3— �!yl - 3 y Ce 17c2 KP pee) pt ,�,r4- ttil)“1 ` *51023 Date: G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DGC, 17/08/99 1 S -1I o� COvv.. -s o4AI _ Control No. Epic File No. � Zood • 0,7 q- Fee $325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND I. Name of proposed project. if applicable: Executive Real Estate Inc. Single- family Residence, South I36`h Street, Foster Stephen -- DC -3S BG at SE 2. Name of applicant: D.J. Sumpter. Executive Real Estate, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Phone: (206) 680 -3636 Address: 40 Lake Bellevue. Suite 100. Bellevue, Washington 98005 4. Date checklist prepared: March 10. 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timin_ or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The applicant wants to construct as soon as possible. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A wetland investigation was performed by .l. S. Jones and Associates, Inc., dated Feburary 22, 2000. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. Yes. Single- Family Permit No. D99 -0346 RECEIVED CITY OF Ti c:,,.,:, MAY 0 1 PERMIT CEN , RECEIVED CITY nC T::�'�' �!.A .:ENTER 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Single- Family Residence Permit and Reasonable Use Exception I. Give brief. complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The applicant proposes to construct a 2,252 square foot house on a 15,665 square foot lot. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area. provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan. vicinity map. and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located immediately south of South 136th Street and 50 feet west of Interstate 5 in Tukwila. Washington. The legal description is as follows: LOT 152304 BLK 18 POR SE '/a OF SE 'VI & GL I DAP -BEG 270 FT E OF SW COR GL 1 TH N 59 -49 -22 E 250.35. 2. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive? No 3 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly steep slopes, mountainous, other Sloping to the west b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil on site is Norma gravelly sandy loam, described in the Soil Survey of King County Area Washington (Snyder, 1973). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications of unstable soils e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of till. The till is for the construction of a single- family residence. Fill is not proposed. .7 % 4 A w a 1 AVA,UL \. "- 7. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion as a result of clearing and construction is a potential problem. A seasonal stream flows along the west property line. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 2,936 square feet. Approximately 19% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Filter fencing will prevent the movement of suspended solids off -site. eV aim- - t44d -c- i•il o ctvi 4 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be the normal dust, equipment and automobile odors associated with the construction of a single- family residence. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed 3. Water a. Surface: I) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it Clow into. Yes, an unnamed seasonal stream flows along the west property line. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 5 Evaluation for Agency Use Only ) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a I00 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: I) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose. and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals ...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of housed to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities. if know). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff will be roof` drains and the driveway. Runoff will flow into the road ditch that the stream flows into. �u,va �ws, \4SK kC So,.` 11-7.0 -Des �Vlcuuul S.w.cti)/ S tr-es • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Yes, pollutants from the street and driveway may enter surface waters. 6 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: caw irxewxi, MAI 9 c)-1 he. . 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: tir, cedar. pine, other shrubs _ grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup. bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Reed canarygrass, Himalayan blackberry, red alder. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to presence or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are know to be on or near the site: birds: hawk. heron. eagle. songbirds. other: mammals: deer. bear. elk. beaver. other: fish: bass. salmon. trout, herring, shellfish. other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None 7 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes, Pacific Flyway d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are luded m t e plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impact, if an • No N 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic chemicals, r sk?6 re and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 'No I) Describe especial emergency services that might be required. Fire and emergency medical 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any: None 8 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Noise I) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Aircraft. Interstate 5 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated, with the project on a short -term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise between the hours of 7 am and 5 pm on weekdays 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently a vacant lot. Adjacent properties are single- family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so. what? Not- e. What is the current zoninv, classification of the site? LDR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LDR 9 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. if applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? Is so, specify. Yes, the entire site is wetland with a stream present west of the property. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Between one and five j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. One b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Twenty -five feet b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 10 1 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None c. What existing, off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if anv: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on the site plans, if any. The site is located between Interstate 5 and Macadam Rd. S., accessed from S.132 " St. and 33 ' Ave. S. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest bus stop is located on Macadam Rd S and 48'h Ave S c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will have two parkin, spaces outside the garage and will not displace any parking spaces. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 2-6 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care. schools. other)? If so. generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Seattle City Light, U. S. West. Seattle Public Utilities C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make it Signature: Date Submitted: 12 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 22, 2000 Mr. D.J. Sumpter 718 S.W. Dash Point Road Federal Way, Washington 98023 Re: Reasonable Use Exception (L2000 -010) SEPA Environmental Review (E2000 -004) at 4831 South 136th Street, Tukwila Dear Mr. Sumpter: We have received and reviewed your documentation for the above - referenced applications, submitted to us on March 15, 2000. We have the following comments. Your applications for a Reasonable Use Exception and SEPA Environmental Review have been found to be incomplete. In order to continue processing your applications there are additional items that must be submitted to the Department of Community Development. These items are listed below. SEPA APPLICATION: 1. Application for SEPA Environmental Review (copy attached). This form was not included in your submission materials. 2. Five (5) copies of the SEPA Checklist (each copy must be executed and dated). You submitted three unsigned copies. 3. King County Assessor's map(s) showing the boundaries of the subject property and the 500 foot public notice area (see "Public Notice Materials" handout, attached). 4. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of all property lines of the subject property. Each unit in multiple - family buildings (i.e., apartments, condos, trailer parks must be included). See "Public Notice Materials" handout, attached. 5. Signed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. D. J. Sumpter March 22, 2000 Page 2 • • REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION APPLICATION: 6. Completed and executed Certificate of Water Availability (attached). 7. Completed and executed Certificate of Sewer Availability (attached). 8. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. The criteria for the notice board is provided on Figures 1 -5 (attached). 9. Affidavit of Installation and Posting of Public Information Signs. Once a complete application has been received, you will be provided with a Notice of Application for posting on the notice board. The attached affidavit must be executed and notarized to document that posting. Upon receipt of Items 1 -7 above, the City will continue processing your applications. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within 90 days of the date of this letter, unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.104.070(E) of the Tukwila Municipal Code. If you should have any questions regarding the within, please do not hesitate to contact me at 206 - 431 -3663. Sincerely, arI2- Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner Enclosures NORTH 4 SITE PLAN Scale: 1" = 20' REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION _ SITE ADDRESS: _ 48XX SOUTH 136T8, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98168 O O 0: OY t� H LU W}O LL 1- X tr O czC W d VICINTY MAP ( c- HRH l ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS _-- NV Executive Real Estate, Inc. 40 Lake Bellevue, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 48XX South 136th Tukwila, Washington 98168 00030000018 3/09/00 I " =20' 1 of 1 • • J. S. Jones and Associates, ]Inc. February 22, 2000 Mr. D. J. Sumpter Executive Real Estate, Inc. 40 Lake Bellevue, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER RE: Wetland Assessment of the property located at 48XX S. 136th St., Tukwila, WA Mr. Sumpter, Purpose The purpose of performing a wetland assessment was to determine if there are any wetlands on or near the property. Location The site is locate fifty feet west of Interstate 5 and immediately south of S. 136th Street in the 4800 block of Tukwila, Washington, 98168. Site Description The site is bordered to the east by Interstate 5 the north by S. 136`h St. and the west by an unnamed creek. The site slopes to the west towards the unnamed creek. Vegetation is dominated by red alder (Alnus rubra), Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). Methodology The Wetland determination was performed using the Routine On -Site Small Area Determination Methodology as described in Part IV, Section D of the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Corps of Engineers, 1987). This determination is based on the presence of the three criteria for jurisdictional wetlands: hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. All three criteria must be present in order to classify an area as a wetland. The wetland determination also included a review of the USDA Soil Conservation Service's, Soil Survey of King County (Snyder, 1973) and the King County Wetland Inventory (Environmental Division, 1991). Hydrophytic vegetation has developed specific adaptations in order to survive in saturated or inundated environments. The probability of species being found in wetland environments has been determined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (US FWS, 1988) and the 1993 Supplement (US FWS, 1993) (see Table 1). An "indicator status" was applied to each species according to its probability of occurring in wetlands. 3408 52nd Place, N.E. T A C O M A, W A S H I N G T O N 9 8 4 2 2 253- 942 -7131 / FAX 253-942-7132 L2-OpO•Ofd 4, S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Hydric soils are defined as those soils that are "saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part" (NTCHS, 1987). They are either organic soils (peats and mucks), or mineral soils that are saturated long enough to produce soil properties associated with a reducing environment. Table 1: Plant Indicator Status Indicator Category Symbol Occurrence in Wetlands Obligate Wetland OBL > 99% Facultative Wetland FACW 67 -99% Facultative FAC 34 -67% Facultative Upland FACU 1 -33% Upland UPL > 1% Note: FACW. FAC and FACU have + and - values to represent species near the wetter end of the spectrum ( +) and the drier end of the spectrum ( -). The 1987 manual requires inundation, flooding, or saturation to the surface for at least 5% of the growing season to satisfy the hydrology requirements for jurisdictional wetlands. In Western Washington, wetland hydrology is typically present from December to May, and the growing season is normally from mid - February to mid - November, depending upon location and local climate. The growing season can either be defined by the number of frost -free days (temperatures above 28 °F), or the period during which the soil temperature, at a depth of 19.7 inches, is above biological zero (41°F). Results The entire parcel is wetland. At sample location 1 (SL 1), the "A" horizon is a black (10YR 2/1) from 0 to 18+ inches. This profile is most like Norma silt loam. The soils are hydric because they are one chroma at ten inches. Vegetation is dominated by creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens. FACW), reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea, FAC), Himalayan blackberry (Rebus procerus, FACU) and red alder (Alnus rubra, FAC). The plant community is hydrophytic because more than 50% of the dominants are FAC, FACW or OBL. Wetland hydrology was present at the time of the wetland assessment. The soils were saturated to the surface with a water table at one inch. Authority The wetland determination is in accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the objective of which is to "maintain and restore the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the waters of the United States" (COE, 1987). Wetlands are defined as "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas" (EPA, 40 CFR 230.3 and CE, 33 CFR 328.3). 2 •J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. Limitations Wetland determinations and delineations are not final until approved by regulatory agencies and /or local jurisdictions. Wetlands are subject to seasonal and annual variation. J. S. Jones and Associates, Inc. does not guarantee acceptance or approval by regulatory agencies, or that any intended use will be achieved. Very ]7uly, L� ce Erickson Environmental Designer Executive Real Estate, Inc. 48XX South 136th Street Tukwila, Washington Figure 2.0 Wetland Sketch 3 • SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): ���o ✓moo. Taxonomy (Subgroup): Pofile Description: Depth (1 i c Horizon Matrix Colors JeJones and Associates, Inc. Drainage Class: Do Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No Motile Colors Mottle Texture, Structure (Munsell Moist) Abundance /contrast Cbncretions. etc. 5 L_ Hydric Soil Indicators: Ilistosol _ I Iistic Epipedon _ Sulfidic Odor ✓4quic Moisture Regime educing Conditions _eyed or Low - Chroma Colors 2 Chroma with Mottling Basis for Decision: _ Concretions High Organic Content in Surface layer in Sandy Soils _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils Listed on Local Hydric Soils List _ Listed on National Hydric Soils List Other (Explain in Remarks) WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? No e e No No Is the Sampling Point in a Wetland? Remarks: * This data form is a combination of the original and amended 1987 Routine Wetland Determination data forms. • J.4bIones and Associates, Inc. Routine Wetland Determination Data Form (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: .--:<<,,T,vr e. e. Dominant Woody Vines Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Date: Igloo Percent Stem Cover Count ' Applicant/Owner: Di_ S4cr P-00.— County: 14.".1c.,.. Investigator: L. F,.-:.r,/...c..:,,........ S State: t;,i,s- 10. maturated in Upper 12 Inches Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site ?: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Is the area a potential problem area? Explain: Yes Yes No CO-' g7 Community ID: Transect ID: _ Plot ID: 12. Sample Loc.: 5e.- -( _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Dominant Indicator Percent Stem Shrub Species Status Cover Count Dominant Herb Species Wetl. /Upl: _ Percent Cover 5. 13..,-.' 4 co. .... 'f.,..104 40 Dominant Indicator Percent Basal Tree Species Status Cover Area Dominant Woody Vines Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Indicator Status Percent Stem Cover Count ' 1 ' L - Pt, GO 9. 1• If< Fity__,-1 S ..,(Cif:' 2. 10. maturated in Upper 12 Inches . _ Other 3. I1. _ Drift Lines _ 4. 12. Field Observations., _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Dominant Indicator Percent Stem Shrub Species Status Cover Count Dominant Herb Species c., .4.1.t.4 Indicator Status Percent Cover 5. 13..,-.' 4 co. .... 'f.,..104 40 6. 14.c,,.4n.....12. ....1., id .. .Kj,. 10 7. 15. Basis for Decision: `I 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or (Excluding FAC -) FAC: 75% Basis for Decision: c.-v.- cy "7... -t do, .,,..,,.. k-s , F7^c Flirt-1,1 ve fit.. Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Primary Indicators: 4 _ _ Stream, Lake or Tide Guage Inundated _ Aerial Photographs maturated in Upper 12 Inches . _ Other _ Water marks No Recorded Data Available: _ Drift Lines _ Sediment Deposits Field Observations., _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels (upper 12 ") _ Water- Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit 1 (in.) _ Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC- Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Basis for Decision: `I