Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E2000-024 - FRED MCCONKEY - NEWPORTER APARTMENT DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARINGMCCONKEY DEVELOPMENT NEWPORTER APARTMENT DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARING 14840 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. SO. E2000 -024 (.11 CASE ® ENGINEERING Consulting Electrical Engineers 10009 Main Street, Bothell, WA 98011 Phone: 425 -402 -9400 Fax: 425 -402 -9402 MEMORANDUM RECE1VFD 'JUN 0 7 2005 DEVELOPMENT Date: June 06, 2005 Project No: 5022 Project: Northfield Car Wash Subject: Exterior Lighting Layout Dear Mr. Miles, We have revised the site plan to include the criteria in Tukwila International Blvd. Design Manual. We have revised the site light poles to 30' -0" poles with 18" bases. We also revised the wattage of the site lighting to 250W metal halide for the entire site lighting system. The study we are submitting is taken at 7'0" and meets the requirement of providing an overlapping pattern of light. Also, the grid is set up on 3' -0" points or one yard intervals. We are achieving 4:1 average to minimum at the height, which is the Illumination Engineering Society's recommendation for light ratios for ease of viewing facial features. We also are attaching the revised lighting calculation taken at 0' -0" showing a maximum to minimum ratio meeting Mr. Abbitts requirements of maximum to minimum ratio of 15:1 or better. Thank you, Stephanie J. Enlow L.C. Jun 06 05 07:51a Carl Bloom May 6, 2005 206- 329 -4634 p.1 ENVIRONALYSIS, LLC AIR QUALITY AND NOISE CONSULTING Mr. Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, 98188 Brandon, I've looked over the noise study you sent for the proposed car wash. Standard methodology was used by the noise consultant, but the amount of noise reduction (16 dBA) credited to the 6 foot wooden fence seems high. My peer review will focus upon this issue and could include discussions with the noise consultant. For budget purposes I expect that this review will not require more than 5 hours of labor and, with expenses, the cost will not exceed $500. Please call if you have any questions. Yours truly, Carl Bloom principal 422 30th avenue Seattle, WA 98122 (206)329-4634 cbloom @environalysis.com • CITY OF TUKWI1--A,,• DETERMINATION _ OF NON,SIGNIFLCAN=C:EN'S ) DESCRIPTION PROPOSAL :_ DEMOLITION CLEARING- iF A 17 UNIT, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SPACE IN :4: BLDG;:, PROPONENT rg; A,l.CAY-1V-, LOCATION OF PROPO'=,AL,,.TNCLUDING 'STREETADDRE'SS, IF ANY:, ADDRE'SS_: _ 1480 TUK.WI"LA INTERNATIONAL_-.EIL PAR(EL N0 O04 'O0= -013k1 ,: `: SEC %TWN /RNG : 2272304 CITY OF TUKWILA LEAD AGENCY: FILE NO: E2O00 -024' The City `has determined that the prOpoSatdOes not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment: ;, An environmental impact statement (EI'S) is not requ i red 'under RCW -,43. 21 c, 030 (2) (e) . This decision was made" after review of a:_comp-l"eted environmental checklist and. ,ot:he,r i ntornrat. i on on file with the lead - ,agency This information :i:. available tai' the public on requie st. •A :t :l:ll ***•k•k:l•....:k**i*; ** .A*k***:kkkAk* **•A:k•k:k**il:k*kA:k . k:k *,A;A:4*:i*k•A *•A: A *•A *•k:.k* This DN'S , is issued "u `nd'e.r WAC 1 ",7 11,- :4.0 (2).,. comment'§ must be submitted by 2,001) ` The lead agency will not act on this proposal tor 14 days from t.he, date below C a Aiate._vsVa&- 15.E WOO Date Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431 -3670 6.300 Southcent.er Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. 'r Memorandum To: Steve Lancaster From: Moira Carr Bradshaw Date: November 14, 2000 Subject: Newporter Apartments Demolition 14840 Tukwila International Bl E2000 -024 Project Description: A 1942 motor court development that has evolved into a 17 unit apartment and office space is proposed for demolition. Agencies with Jurisdiction: City of Tukwila Required Permits /Approvals: City of Tukwila Demolition permits for each of the four structures Puget Sound Clean Air Agency asbestos removal permit ValVue Sewer District Water District 125 Notice of Application Issued October 25, 2000 Comment Period Deadline: November 8, 2000 Public Comments Received: None Documents considered with SEPA checklist: 1. Asbestos Report (ADaPT Engineering, Inc. August 1999) 2. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (GeoTech Consultants, March 1999) 3. Geotechnical Engineering Study (GeoTech Consultants, March 1999) Comments to SEPA Checklist: Tukwila Public Works Department: Proposed erosion control measures are insufficient for erosion prevention and sediment control. Applicant will be required to follow City standards. Tukwila Building Department Checklist mentions no permits. City demolition permits as well as a Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority will require an asbestos removal permit. ValVue Sewer and Water District 125 will also require utility permits. C:\mcb\nwprtr \separeport.doc Page 1 of 3 11/14/00 • • Tukwila Police Department:_ have no comments at this time. Previous verbal comments from Chief Haines relate to security of the site until the structures are gone and then maintaining adequate light levels to allow surveillance of site until it is redeveloped. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth On -site soils, silty glacial till, is very susceptible to erosion. The site is relatively flat adjacent to Tukwila International Bl. and then slopes down toward the east property line. A temporary erosion control plan will be required and the applicant is recommending best management practices for erosion control measures Air N/A Water N/A Nuisance Dust and noise from the demolition and hauling will be a short term problem for adjacent residents, businesses, customers, pedestrians and motorists. Long term the site will be vacant until plans for its redevelopment are decided and completed. The primary nuisance issue will then be maintenance of the site. Plants The applicant indicates that all shrubs and groundcovers will be removed and trees will be maintained. Animals N/A Energy/Natural Resources N/A Environmental Health A Phase 1 environmental assessment was conducted in 1999. The three likely health hazards include an underground oil fuel tank, asbestos in the building materials and lead paint. The removal of the underground tank and assessment of proximal soils was recommended. A specific asbestos survey was done (AdaPT, 1999) on three of the four buildings and recommendations for removal of contaminated materials were made. The property to the south, Southtown Auto Rebuild, had three underground tanks removed along with surrounding contaminated soils. The consultant's opinion is that any contamination has not occurred on the site. Three soil borings were dug and no indication of contamination was noticed. Land /Shoreline Use The land surrounding the site is commercial to the north, south, and west and residential to the east. Housing The site contains 16 low income rental units and will displace 18 individuals. The applicant indicates that the displaced tenants have been given 30 days notice and financial assistance to relocate. Monthly rents for the motel rooms and the housing associated with the motel were approximately $560 to $650 a month. C:\mcb\nwprtr \separeport.doc Page 2 of 3 11/14/00 • 1999 affordable monthly rents for low income 1 person households are $548 and low income 2.5 person households are $665. This housing therefore provided affordable rents for low income 1 and 2.5 person households. Although the redevelopment site has been partially used as low and moderate income residential, the site has been zoned commercial since the area annexed to the City of Tukwila in 1989. The City has modified the zoning and is working on capital improvement projects that encourage the redevelopment of the area with denser, multi -story development. The general area of the Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor has been a significant source of crime. The City is addressing the crime and safety problems through diverse programs including the development goal of creating a greater mix of household incomes as well has a greater number of households to support the commercial corridor. This effort requires targeted demolition and redevelopment of existing low scale one story, low density development. Aesthetics N/A Light and Glare N/A Recreation N/A Historic and Cultural Preservation The buildings were built in 1942 and are deco-modern style in stucco. According to the environmental assessment, as a garage park motel, each motel unit had a garage, but these garages were at some point converted to living units. The site is not listed on the state or national registry of historic places or structures. Transportation N/A Public Services N/A Utilities Existing utilities serving the site will be capped. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance C:\mcb\nwprtr \separeport.doc Page 3 of 3 11/14/00 • • EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GUIDELINES Applicant Handout City of Tukwila The Land Altering permit application shall include an erosion prevention and sediment control plan designed in accordance the current edition of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. The plan shall provide information for temporary erosion prevention and sediment control during all phases of construction and also shall provide permanent stabilization for disturbed areas. During construction, the City may require additional measures as needed to prevent erosion and retain sediment. 1. Principles — The plan shall emphasize erosion prevention rather than sediment control and shall minimize the extent and duration of soil exposure. In addition, the plan shall minimize runoff -off velocities and retain sediment on -site. 2. Plan — At a minimum the ESC plan shall show clearing limits, sensitive area buffers, and shall provide temporary stabilization, sediment retention, and perimeter protection. In addition, some projects will require stabilized traffic areas and surface water controls, which shall be shown on the ESC plan. The plan shall also provide a description of final stabilization methods. 3. Seeding — The plan shall provide the seed mix for the temporary and permanent seeding. 4. Cover measures — May 1 through September 30, temporary cover measures shall be installed on ALL areas left undisturbed for more than seven days. October 1 through April 30, temporary cover measures shall be installed on ALL disturbed areas left unworked for more than TWO DAYS. These requirements may be relaxed at the City's discretion, depending on site topography and other conditions. At all times, any disturbed areas left unworked for more than 30 days shall be seeded. Printed 10/25/00 Page 1 EROSION •VENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTR•GUIDELINES Applicant Handout City of Tukwila 5. Wet season requirements — At a minimum, the ESC plan and plan notes shall provide the following for work which will occur from October 1 through April 30: • Install temporary cover measures on all areas which will remain unworked for more than TWO DAYS and on stockpiles and steep cut and fill slopes. • Retain onsite a quantity of cover measures materials sufficient to cover all disturbed areas. • By October 8, temporarily seed and mulch all areas that will be unworked during the wet season. • Mulch all seeded areas. • Stabilize all construction traffic areas, unless already graveled. Permittee shall perform work per the approved erosion prevention and sediment control plan. The Permittee must maintain a set of approved plans and specifications and associated permits on the job site. Work shall be performed in accordance with all Federal, state and local laws. Maintenance 1. Failure to maintain ESC measures in accordance with the approved maintenance schedule may result in the work being performed at the direction of the Director and assessed as a lien against the property where such facilities are located. 2. During the life of the project, the Permittee shall maintain in good condition and promptly repair, restore, or replace all grade surfaces, walls, drains, dams, structures, vegetation, erosion and sediment control measures, and other protective devices in accordance with approved plans. 3. The Permittee shall monitor the downstream drainage features, and shall, with City approval, remove all sediment deposition resulting from project- related work. Printed 10/25/00 Page 2 EROSION PR2'CENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLJIDELINES Applicant Handout City of Tukwila Responsibilities 1) The Permittee must install erosion prevention and sediment control measures as the first order of business The Permittee should install the downstream temporary ESC measures before any site disturbance occurs. Before the temporary measures are removed, the Permittee must install and establish the upstream permanent ESC measures. 2) The Permittee shall at all times protect sensitive areas, their buffers, and adjacent private properties and public rights -of -way or easements from damage during land altering operations. The Permittee shall restore, to the standards in effect at the time of the issuance of the permit, sensitive areas, their buffers, and public and private properties and improvements damaged by the Permittee's operations. 3) Permittee shall arrange for and comply with the following: • Notify the Public Works Department within 48 hours following installation of ESC measures. • Obtain permission in writing from the Public Works Department prior to modifying the ESC plan. • Maintain all road drainage systems, storm water drainage systems, control measures and other facilities as identified in the ESC plan. • Repair any siltation or erosion damages to adjoining properties and drainage facilities. • Inspect according to the approved ESC inspection schedule, and make needed repairs immediately. Printed 10/25/00 Page 3 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 25, 2000 Fred McConkey 3006 Northup Way, Suite 101 Bellevue WA 98004 Subject: Notice of Completeness E2000 -024: Newporter Apartments Demo Dear Fred, Your SEPA application is considered complete. Within 14 days you must post the Notice of Application on the site. We are mailing the Notice of Application to surrounding property owners and tenants. A description of the posting requirements is in your application packet. Please call me at (206) 431 -9053 if have any questions regarding the application. Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner Enclosure C: \mcb \nwprtr \notofcompl t. doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Gity of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATE: October 25, 2000 The following- appl_ica.tion_has .been. submitted to the City of Tukwila D epar ment of Community Development for review and decision. PROPOSAL: To demolish the Newporter Apartments, which consists of 16 living units and commercial space in four structures. LOCATION: 14840 Tukwila International Bl., Tukwila, WA APPLICANT: Fred McConkey Development FILE NUMBER: E2000 -024 Environmental Checklist REQUIRED PERMITS: SEPA Decision - State Environmental Policy Act Determination City of Tukwila Demolition Permits Puget Sound Clean Air Agency asbestos removal permit These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You are invited to submit comments on this application. The deadline for- submitting comments -is: 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday November 8, 2000. Submit your comments in writing to: Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, WA. 98188 Or mbradshaw@ci.tukwila.wa.us Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. If you have questions about this proposal contact Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, at (206) 431 -3651 APPEALS A description of the appeal process is contained in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ISSUED: October 13, 2000 October 24, 2000 October 25, 2000 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 A D13.5 ■-10070\ 392 (II_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT POHIION OF 1015 8, 27. AND 28 IN BLOCK 2 or FIRST ADOR40N TO ADAM'S 14044E MAC15. AS RECORDED IN v0LU4E 12 Of PLATS. PAGE 50, RECORDS 01" KING COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS !04106-5: . DECODING AT THE 4147ER5ECT4044 OF T14E NORM UNE OF SOUTH 150141 STREET AND THE EASTERLY 1I146 Of STATE ROAD 110. 1; THENCE NORTH IB 28' 40 LAST ALONG 111E EASTERLY 14( OF SAO ROAD. 126.43 FEET 10 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING WHICH 15 0/4 THE NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID 1015 27 AND 28 AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 84 11' 10 (05T ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 19031 FEET 10 A PONT ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27 AND WHICH 15 120 FEET NORTH OF 111E SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE 006144 00 33' 50 WEST ALONG 111E EAST UNE OF LOTS 27 AND 6, A DISTANCE OF 220.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 44' 10- WEST, 114.60 FEET 10 THE EAST UNE OF STATE ROAD 110. I; THENCE 011 SAO EAST UNE 5011144 I8' 28' 444 ■EST. 232 FEET TO THE POINT OF 8(641118116; 110 THAT PORTION OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 2 Of SAID PLAT. DESCRIBED AS [0110*$: BEGINI4416 AI THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 15001 STREET AND THE EASTERLY UNE OF STATE ROAD 110. I; THENCE NORM 18' 28' 10' EAST ALONG 111E EASTERLY LINE Or SAT) ROAD. 126.43 FEET TO THE TRINE POINT Or BEGINNING WHICII 15 ON THE NORTH LINE Of THE SOUTH 420 FEET OF SAD LOTS 27 AND 28 AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH BO 44' 10' EAST ALONG 5110 NORTH (I11E, 190.31 FEET 10 A P01141 ON DIE EAST LINE OF LOT 27 14644 15 120 FEET NORTH OF 111E SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; NORM OCT 33' 5(6 WEST ALONG 111E EAST LINE OF LOT 27, A OF 55.89 FEET 10 144E TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE 00 33' 50 WEST ALONG. THE EAST LINE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE Or 137.48 FEEL TO THE NORM UNE OF 101 77; THENCE EAST 23.34 FEET ALONG THE NORTH (4446 OF 101 26 WINCH LINE 15 A PROLONGATION OF THE NORTH 1.I111 Or LOT 27; THENCE 50U141WE51 13906 FEET 10 THE IRUE POINT OF BEGRN79110. (11150 414671 AS L01 A OF 101 UNE ADJUSTMENT N0. 983059, RECORDED 1410ER RECORDING 740. 6901180986) SITUATE IN THE CRY OF TUKWIIA COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 CONSTRUCTION 0.880 W BI; TWIN TO A 42446 MU NI LA(F14 M ;lento FACILITY 054054.047048401744(9441818444914014(848 0144470 BY CONING DE A646 COUNTY SCUD l(54( 044901 AT (204) 796 -1111. 2. (R(f( COONS 843.615441.. SET TOO) 11151 8E N51N110 KICK 05440WG MT 411 05501814,0 144 111( 004401001 4(01414. 3 I( 7080(1101 0 118 0154146 934146(5 14151 8 6(4401(0 0/10511441 AIO THE 110115 11110 144 ON -91E 5065 DE MAO( 0 BE 911 11451 0 SAWN 4 MEN 0116-404 610145(41 A 030[(704 NLL 0 RE046D, BY DE CITY Of ONO. 5. KKR IO 001(Ai1EN 0 (AM 8161646 111 458(5105 CCNIANMG 4441770415 (A6-5) 1051 a K140'11). L 41 (65ING TREES 10 RUN( FROM FEMME Al DRAMS. FILTER (40810 841(614. .4146114 100A 06 EQUAL USE 511815 01 DIRT RUES 10 MINOT AMMO 10 DM 2'.7 .14 U. K10(0 EIRE FABRIC CR MK A ll T„i�i1JIIIi I IIiIIi a'SEU - _ aa'4"11 1. U U U L54(411(4(( CYSTS • 4'0.6. (TV .) A BI1DWC / AREA (9)) 1 5.626 4 615 . -17-T r 3.150 r. i l , jl ( / /l�� \ ' \ j/��r j i. . I \. '>'-' y / //r� - „� �// a . 4 a.__x-1;�-..� - --`- I 1 . //I/ 6 41 4491if.l44 IDE I 7414107 Tam 106110110! ri/ lam. !ITT }Nv.M I 1 ,.• :VIVRE fAS TINT 10 BC `l-ii' -1400 ...° 14N4'19ED (IYP) ' /(REEL 91100 MVO 95 -02411 '104IRAC10R 10 (1(1D NATTY. • (1 ,_ V. 11441 • '7/ f/ TIMC CINCH 0.30.134 "WU, 0410.11.11 ON 1X=1 lF t re ...THnH o- IK N..,.». [M (051146 54114414 -: -90E'911CRS AT PROPERTY UNE Ca17UC10 10 COMMA LOCATION. 45TM1 RHEA FOIC %1110 94 PR44RR Now_ Tr( O HL I tt NAM LOCATION i 4.15104 S(MR LINE (119) . - 101041 WE stop 94511461 43-931(1.) ; CONTRALTO 10 FIELD YFNTY. �G'\ 1 . TO RERAN �(41)EHE OMF. `- NOTE 6.L•j I \O� P.,0' 0011 GRAPHIC SCALE I .AN�u.N.ms ac.41. tam As 11 / (841 0 01106)1494 ri 440001114 14 ) 7 140 L I t■ U04511A0O (ROAD BURY L TIER 784610 IN 17(NO/ TILLED SECTION A -A 44448 OTANI BALK - 1414 TOR DRAINS . NOTE: IRII WAIT 414 0 Of PROJECT 74 Will DIRECTED By I( (1118, I( 1111ER 780444( 1(110 9V1L EE ORONO IN 115 ENTIRETY 140 DISPOSED OF BY (41 0311846101. FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL NI5 qcwc141( l 11010i' 1 , (MST GAS DE 10 0 NICE IS D p P)/ ( I NEXT AS- BUNT.) f! 1810191 1 f1E10 VERIFY. 271 CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT SEATTLE OTY LICHT AND PUGET SOUND ENERGY TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING DENOUIION OF GAS AND POWER CONNECTIONS. MINIAMIrriSagliii MariMMIMII L� /1116 TIN Nto` \* \`, i� , �� . t� ®6 ,rfrI I(dl+l��l1 1 s /ILitr i�L VICINITY MAP 401 10 SCAT( w LEGEND ASPHALT 0040618 904 44144 1(44 SWIM, GOA SRUC641 54414)1 DMA INK -'-- EOM YON K 11471441 441 0 11NEENT EROSION /SEDIMENTATION COMM. NOTES 1, 111404441 C( III( R09EN CONDO ((SC) TUN 00(5 NM 01115188E M AFIA044 0 /401119011 POAL CA M/NAM OR5n1 ( C6. 911 MO LOC4101 Cf 80105, PPIS 665MK1(RS, 11441111, NOIRE 11(111[7. 0141[5 ETC) 1 DE 64119(1141106 0 1E ESC INNS NO DE (045844710144 NAN MM(EJEPLAO)ENI 040 IRONIAND 0 DIM (5C (10114(5 45 DE RESPON5H111 0 OE 104146401/550 906144541 WIN ALL CONSIRUCI90R IS AMMO. 3. DE 001.110111[5 or DE 0EA6NG LITRES 91011 ON IN( BSC RAN 91441 04 OEART (LAGGED BY A common 1114614 0 91ANT (74 TOOK. F NEC/RED) PRYOR 10 Co5RUCOom DOING DE CC01519I410N 7[600, NO DSEWB EKE REYOIO 111 FLAGGED WANG OM 9OU W 114111100. DE 010NG 111415 9041 BE 1ANIA0ED BY 0E WIXOM/ESC 90(81114.11 IM 11 warm 0 CON516KD41 4. DE ESC 1601415 544064 ON DES[ PLANS 11.61 BE CO161R000D PRIOR 10 M N 061411( O* 144 A11. DIMING AND WANG 50 AS 10 OWE DLO DE l0ANSPM1 Cr 5E0,01 TO 9AfA11 RATERS MANNL 513(703 APO MOUNT MUTES 6 114II120D S I4E ESC FKIITES 94064 ON DE TEX TUN TAE DE 4461RM 6101111015 TM ANT(4110 911 6-96-44443. moo DE 60514UCION 11000. DES/ ESC 1ACUID5 91111 BE 8CR4tt0. AS 41(1(0, 184 4EJPECIED 510E CANTS NO *706L 4 TO 1000111 FM OIANGR1 911 COCOONS ((0, A0INN4t 944 RIPS ROOGION 0 010(5 AND 51I MOS. (IC.) 6 DE CSC MUTES 59111 EC INDICTED OAT BY M 108[4114 7ESC 9.14114911 NO 44184140(0 10 USUAL OCRII1I03 PEEPER 44PIC1l0441 0IIRN MCOQIS 946- B( TEP1 O NEUUI mows 0 DE (5C 4A0UTES BAN6 D( DU SEASON ( OCTOBER 1 10 NAL 30) NO or 1010E1 RIMERS 0140116 1441 441 SEASON (WY 1 10 91.1(4400 30) 1. MT ARIAS 0 (1'O4D 415. W044DM6 6011.10 06ANA44144 THAI Yu 401 H 45118870 FOR 2 DAR DOING DE 1E4 43301 AND 1 DAYS PANG' DE DRY 14431144444414(641t(4(47145141441)191144 04 OE 4PPROND ESC 1ED1005 (E6, 3008E 1110116 PLASTIC 001476!6 (IC) L ANT AKA NEEDING ESC WA9EES 1441 D01401 610117E 64[041( 410(1(6 9441 H AMMO 14418 15 DNS 6. DE ESC N0105 ON NACON DRS 9401 0 W4(CRD AND 44NN140E0 A (NNW 0 440 A TENTH M MEM DE 40 4056 MIME A SIGMA Mil. 10 AI A0 1044 99111 440E THAN 141331 Cr 5mWM1 BE 111060 10 A40.L4WA1E 1MN A CAEN B15N. 441 CATOT BASINS 010 06474117E SEES 96-1 RE Wan RIM TO P41H6 DE 014404 000.1004 914110/rural 40011 -11091 WATER TRIO 91 00■1514109 5451114 II SI1811II0 (L6IRUCI94 081840(15 AN ROADS 9041 EC 445141(0 AI E( 8[6-1446 0 (061044(1(6 AND 60014000 FOR OE WRANION 0f 1( 01131(1. AD011946 RAMS, 9101 AS 0091 PADS NAY IE REOAND TO [113148( EMI ALL PAND APE on cum IM ►E BRAWN 0 /E 040101. 17. ANT 4111411[11 ILO( COMB. FA01N V40 AS A 411N(IRM, 41896 &9A 96-1 H WINED 1M THE 1(6(55201 440901 CONTROL NEA3LRE5 AND 9141 PRIME 111:0418 51064E 0471017 P DE NOLO 6 1011/10411 LE DEARLY AS M / /6181 RCN STSrtN. 141 4(1646414 110110 RUST 04 GREED 50 THAT OE UMW 400 SIDES ARE AT (1.651 3 CELT *OW DE TWIT GRADE OF DE 864411111 441E17Y IL 84(6 51!18811401 FCR IOPMM4 004406 (0111114 6 R(W(0 II 96-1 Y 11414) U AT A NANNY DKAKSS C( 2 10 3 WOES . 11. MICR 10 DE 00101816 0 THE WISE/SON (OCTOBER I). 441 U5IIAID A5(AS 94141 BE WADED 10 UNITY 11194 44(5 CAN BE SEEDED N PREPARATION 4CR 1( MNIR RAMS 66448800 4EA5 94911 BE SUDO 1084 1 44(1 0 0E 0!11946 0 THE NEl SEASON A 511(9 IM 0 M05E MIAS RIB SEEDED AND 4404 WAS CO ROHM 41(014018 94441 H 946611(1.10 DE 011 0 !LANKA NPCCIM TIE 011 09[0174 CM 4410144 4(0846 OF 4000014 ACEAS N MOCK 10 PROTECT DANCE EMIRS *041011 tVPER115 74 moult FACTURES UTILITIES/PURVEYORS 510818 DRAINAGE CITY OF TUKWILA RYAN LAR5(1N (206) 433 -0179 500110RY SEWER vALN/E SEWER DIST. ACCT. /173153 STEW 7LL(1NER (206) 242 -3236 WATER K.C. WATER 051./ 125 ACCT. /0311 -501 ACCT. /00-41 - 000130 RU55 405119 (206) 242 -9517 NA10RA1 GAS PUGET SOUND ENERGY CORD 5HEA (206) 766 -6782 ELECTRICITY SEATTLE CITY LIGHT BOB HANSEN (206) 386 -1670 TELEPHONE 01/E5T (800) 244 -1111 (601.1 A1411 BROADBAND (PSC) APPUCANT /OWNER MCCONKEY CEK1OP411111 CC1IPAN/ 3006 NORTHROP WAY, SUITE 101 BELLENIE. WA 96004 (425) 1389 -1160 SURVEYOR (AR /111(011 720 S 33380 574EE1. 5410 200 FEDERAL WALT. WA 98003 (253) 638 -6202 ASBESTOS SURVEYOR ADAPI ENCINEERI4IG 800 90774150 470361E 5.. 501E 403 SEAIRE, WA 98134 (206) 654 -1045 L -w (94411 61 0994(0 i4 SR 119 B(CKETT er woven BY 2 I0 -16 -00 10 -Il -DO ND M44 NM NN CM5 6-5 0. 091E BY C.D. 406-94 FER411 5118114441 140.011 RANI 9116 144 REU190N 0644 13 OC1 00 `CALL 48 HOl.BS BEFORE YOU OIG }'800-424.5555 , 1 0 B No.: 100392 5C011: r• 31' ri.fiY cw4NJ4:9 (4476-1 611 1849 4.44. 1 S..4. 900 So(I461 6410044411 980 41014 63 583 4'.. 0164 63 80.7 McCONKEY DEMOLITION (UKNAU, WASHINGTON SHEET DEMOLITION PLAN COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted in a later timely manner for use at the Public Hearing (e.g., revised colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED, TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 Department of Community Development and 206 -433 -0179 Department of Public Works. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE Information Required May be waived in: unusual : cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning ' :Inforn ation ,` Waived PbWk /Ping Office Use Only Comments &:Conditions. APPLICATION FORMS: 1. Application Checklist one (1) copy, indicating v items submitted with application. 2. Four (4) copies of supporting studies with original signatures and license stamp as needed. 3. Complete Application Packet: Six (6) copies of application form and full sized plans, one set of all plans reduced to 8.5" by 11" (High Quality Photo Reduction) and other materials and information as specifically listed in Project Description and Analysis, Site Plans, Landscape Plan and Elevations. 4. SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) and fee ($325). ,/a PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 5. King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the V subject lot. /� EMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. 6. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 Ifeet of the subject property. See Public Notice Materials. Note: Each unit in multiple- family buildings -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks m st be included). SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. A 4' x 4' Public Notice Board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. PROPERTY INFORMATION 7. Vicinity Map with site location. 8. Surrounding Land Use Map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 foot radius from the lot's property lines. 9. Title Report -- Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and‘, encumbrances. A RECEIVED 10. Lot lines for 300 ft. from the site's property lines including right-of-ways. OG,1- 1 9 200Q C:\ homepage\ tukwila\ dcd \apps \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(iiuci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF ROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: M C j(1 )MON1 hCPA-' N) ° `'Pb 7 V6 * cF1' ' LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. WM 0 1114.Vrr - \e Wit\ 'Wu& log Parce,\ - - bo4 ccc o Quarter: Section: Township: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : Range: 46. The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. ‘\110,czni Enpfpri'ses Address: 46) 6e, -► \go Phone: Signature: - C( C:\ homepage\ tukwila \dcd \apps \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/ 31/00 � .A FAX: - t9 ' ✓� L7� -c3 y Date: /0/7-00-0 ECEI ED OCT p1 9 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: On /��/,� Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: r$D ,I f Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF ROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: M C j(1 )MON1 hCPA-' N) ° `'Pb 7 V6 * cF1' ' LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. WM 0 1114.Vrr - \e Wit\ 'Wu& log Parce,\ - - bo4 ccc o Quarter: Section: Township: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : Range: 46. The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. ‘\110,czni Enpfpri'ses Address: 46) 6e, -► \go Phone: Signature: - C( C:\ homepage\ tukwila \dcd \apps \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/ 31/00 � .A FAX: - t9 ' ✓� L7� -c3 y Date: /0/7-00-0 ECEI ED OCT p1 9 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tuknlanrii).ci.tukwila.wa.us Al FIDAV1T OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared byme or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants theciry its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at /t/W0 /it. .T/1te l'ier•••■•-1 /Y•• for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), W) (state), on 4/17) v (A / 7 , f - d Pl eeio/N (Print Name) 300 6 /Col /At/ Mty, S` - i!)( (Address) 8e #.4/ ; wA- 4500Y 0.r-may -1i (Phone N Z,/'22222v (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me ( r' `4 ..0 % to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she sign / ' the same as his/her vol act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED 1 1*HT6 ,BEFORE ME ON THIS // DAYf $ �-� IRS , ZO 0 0 � RAPHAF i ` Q►�0OM 'ii NOT • ' PUBLI]L jaapd for theLtate • , ashington t! pp• • i residing at %�t•j,�r • ci MotARy '; I j S o L • 2 My Co.. mmission expires on ' / 4 � %d�0 ''r•`' a 1... ' :: ` •t iiuut • • CITY OF TUI{WILA Department of Commarity Devetopment 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98186 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail' to kplan @ci. tukwila wa. us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) State of Washington Corartfy of King City yofTukwila I ! rd 44(04 y (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at /'1ey0 %,c /L. 7✓It y l? I ✓d so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or Project Manager's ature On this day personally appeared before me rl' 4Q /14 Cf 0 k' to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and a nowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. -7�- SUBSCRIBED AIv iRRN to before me this 1' ' day of 0 L • ►�~ 0 .0! it A P pqE, Q►. •:;LION i e, V $01110 : NeTARY PUBLI Fr: =_ � .��— 0 • raiding at cp •` X0 ~•4 � •wAts�•igb ��vly commission expires on tt//11111111t��,`` • • in d for the State of Washington I V g/o-z___ • • Control No. Epic File No. E 2 WO - 0114 Fee $ 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RECEIVED A. BACKGROUND OCT 1 3 2000 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Newporter Apartment Demolition COMMUNITY 2. Name of applicant: McConkey Development Company Inc. DEVELOPMENT 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3006 Northup Way., Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 — 425- 889 -1180 4. Date checklist prepared: 10 -06 -2000 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 11 -00 Start Demolition and Earth Work, Project to be completed by 11 -20 -2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.: No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental, Asbestos Study, Soils Study 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. None 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain • • aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Demolition and clearing of site. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project. including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 14840 Tukwila International Blvd. S. Tukwila, Washington 98168 Parcel # 004100 - 0130 -04 All Maps Provided 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2. Air ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, ® steep slopes, mountainous, other b. what is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 20% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravelly sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None — only demolition of buildings and grading of current soil. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g . About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? none h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Installation of a silt fence will be occur before demolition begins and will remain through completion of the project. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. • • Heavy equipment will be required to perform site demolition during a two week period. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state the at stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • • , Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: eciduous tre • alder, maple, aspen, other fir, cedar, pine, other pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation • • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? grass, shrubs c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or Other measures to Preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: No new landscaping, current trees will stay. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle) songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measured to preserve or enhance wildlife. If any: No new landscaping, current trees will stay. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? • 1 This site is located on a heavily travel street. Hwy 99. The noise from traffic and other industries will be heard on the site. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: the equipment for demolition will add the expected noise for construction. This noise will be during the day within the 8am to 6pm time frame. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: We are requiring the construction to take place during the day so the traffic and other daily noises already in the area drone out the construction. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? West - Road Hwy 99 North - Vacant Lot East - Vacant Lot South - South Town Auto Body shop b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Currently there is an Apartment Building with a small 600 Sqft House. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The Apartment Building and the small house. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Retail /Commercial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? It is just outside the current Boundaries of the plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program. designation of the site? N/A • • h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 18 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: All tenants have been given 30 -days legal notice to vacate and financial assistance to relocate. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The city is guiding this project and is involved with us in every step. The land use and the project is in line with their current plan 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 17 Low- income apartments. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure( s ) , not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material (s) proposed? N/A • • b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect Your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • • a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Pacific Highway South (SR no. 1 or Tukwila International Blvd) b. Is the site currently served by public transit? if not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. The project will remove 15 designated private parking stalls that serve the units. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None g. • • Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: f ire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: N/A 16. Utilities a . Circl- ies currentl able at 1- t natural ga other. telephone, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Will be capping off all utilities. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Noise will be generated during demolition but will be during daylight hours only and with respect to the neighborhood. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Cannot avoid noise due to the use of heavy equipment, but will use only during the day, Monday - Friday. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Would not affect, as it is currently located in a highly traveled urban site. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No effects are estimated. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A • • Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? None Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: None How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? None Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such dernand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of -the environment. None 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so what policies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflicts are: N/A • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objectives of the proposal? Demolition of apartment complex to provide buyer with cleared site. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Demolition is the only agreed course of action between seller and buyer. 4. Does the proposal conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A Newporter Apartment chronology SEPA application received — October 19,2000 Within 4 working days Notice of Completeness Issued — October 25, 2000 Notice of Application Issued October 25, 2000 Public comment period until November 8, 2000 Within 3 working days Determination of NonSignificance issued November 15, 2000 Public comment period expires November 29, 2000 PARTNER'S CONST INC 000 3 Qy only PIESIMAIDDI B. /Property Otraer. MtCon De+'elopment MA1 = Ad 'a= 3006 Nortfts / Wa Suite 101 Fax 206-852-7936 Oct 110 Un iaa Stroet. suite 500. Seattle, wA 5i1NPF203,11 italundesikan NOTICE OF INTENT C. Asbestos _ Contractor: Mailing Address: Asbestos Removal & Demoliton CITY OF TUKWILA C. '1 771• if/J+ii• '-11 Y. '7't ... PARTNERS CONSTRUCTION, INC 1313 SOUTH CENTRAL AVEJ SUITE A State: WA D. Site Address' 14840 Pacific Ilighweff South Site Man Fred McCon E. Asbestos Survey or ■ MaNI Presamed: A Building Ihff3ector Name: Certification No.: r No. of Structures: 3 96032-7409 7:04 P. 01 Date lea AIR OCT C5 . 2000 •lenity Ws Q*y Demolition No Asbestos Rri gval Phone: Owner /CEO: 206 253 425 889 -1180 98004 DANIEL MURRAY Contractor-1 Job No.: Phone 57S -7d29 Fax• 7936 City: SeaTac Date Survey was Conducted: __.Adam ESCabaR State: WA FZio 98198 Phone* 425 :89 -1180 07/0/00 Was Asbestos Found? ►: ❑ If No. Attach Survey Y F. Deatolhloa Start -__ Noe: Date: Demolition Committer: Demolition Man) Inc. Asbestos Project IalbrmatIon: 994766 No. of Smtetn es Surveyed: (Attach f multiple units) Date: 0sria/01 3 State: WA No. of 11/06;10 Structures: start Date: 1U01/00 resat Thermal S • am Insulation: to be Removed: Linear Ft. 215 Mali: Kisc. Masi: ar Training Fire (Last Fire Dept) Ordered Demolition attach -• of Order Comylction Date: 11(30/00 Ft. 19 0 Bolalfu:aaoe inn. ■ Duct Ias. Pshsa • Planer 61$ Toured Coating Ceaoaoc Apo ! ,4+ • stable Floor62 or Raman Ma'1 w.�c. Poona ( 763•36 Wk. M T W Th Hours: _ ._.. No. of Structures Surveyed chap' ci• AsbesmuDrtm0liti on Project 11. . '. ' auily Residence: (Check box A at 8 for ageism removal & demolition) A. ■ Asbestos Removal Project B. ■ Demolition . ' . - • A. Prior Notice B. 10 Days S2S Non-refundable Fee Covers Asbestos Removal & Donation All Order Dmrmtciom With No Asbestos Removal Project ■ 10 Days 3150 a 10-259 linear feet or a 43 - 139 feet see back ■ 10 r 3150 260 - 999 linear feet or 160 - 4 999 • • % • ' 10 Da 10 Y ij 11.11111WiLlNEIMI IIIIIML000 1 000 - 9 999 /tear feet or 5 000 - 49 999 • • • !ice 6 ■ 10 000 .. _ r. - . 50 000 .1 • _ feet 10 • • - - Asbestos • - - or ■ _ • • . :. _. - Dsmolition ' • - _ Prior Notice t. I do ttwuby o�ttiQ :, t eaaasciea eoateinrd is this . `wand - '�+•�► daft d. eau. tonia, is m the boot of my i4/21 1 /A Ittpsso.riry Dew MI. Lo00 - 251 RECEIVED DATE : 10/11 07:01'00 FROM MI ?.000 — 2.51 M11 ZOOO — 258 2068527936 MT ^2. " A 2E00 a., L • MBE# M5M3907810 Proposal submitted to: ne: McCONKEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Date: Street 42S -8a9 -1130 300e NORTHRUP WAY $101 Job Name: City. State. and Zip Code: BELLEVUE. WA 93004 Job Locetton: JOS CONTACT: 14443 PACIFIC NYVIfY s. FRED MeCOO TACT: Y Date of Plans: !Job Phone: Fax A. We hereby submit specific:aborts and estimates for. 1425.322.9393 BMLM DEMOUTION AND REMOVAL OF APARTMENTS, HOUSE, GARAGES, FOUNDATIONS, WALKWAYS, ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PARKING SLABS. LAN MAIN Lidb / 3 1 8 � RECEIVED • CITY OF TUKWILA PROPOSAL, OEMOLJT1ON MAN INC. 8129 OCCIDENTAL AVE. S. SEATTLE, WA 98108 (206)783 -DEMO FAX: 763 -1690 PERMIT CENTER ST. CONTFL REG. 1 DEMOL w17lN2 P. 1 THESE PRICES EXCLUDE ASBESTOS, PERMITS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, UTILITY SERVICE DISCONNECTION AND RELOCATION, UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS, CONCRETE/ASPHALT SAWCUTS, SALVAGE FOR OWNER. SANDING/GRINDING/CHEMICAL REMOVAL/PATCHING, SECURITY, SEWER CAPPING. SHORING & BRACING, SITE FENCING,UTJLITY CAPPING, UNION PARTICIPATION, PREVAIUNG WAGES, INSURANCE COVERAGE IN EXCESS OF ONE MILLION DOLLARS AS COVERED, NOTE: ASSUMES ONE MOBILIZATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1$ RESPONSIBLE FOR P.S.A.P C:A. NOflRCA TPON OF DEMOL/T77ON - SASIC 81D WITHOUT AL TE. • THESE PRICES CASED ON CURRENT MARKET RATES • • WASHINGTON STATE SALES TAX OF 3.8% IP APPUCABLE - WE PROPOSE hereby to furnish material end labor-complete in accordance with above specifications. for the sum or FORTY ONE THOUSAND AND NO/100 -- dollars $41,000.00 Payment to be made as follows: BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETIOy, NO RETENTION: • 411 material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to aandard prices. Any atteratlon or deviation from above specifications upon written orders. and MU become an extra charge r+vomat ogre glee will t be contingent upon Cee. aoddents or de r8e over and above the estimate. All agreements con agent up delays beyond our control. Owner to carry ire fully covered by Worttmen's Compensatbn N. fie' tornado and other neoeasary Insurance. Our workers urttwrtzed Signature:: .T.M. McF'arlmtd mow Note: as proposal may be vathdi,,...:. within 20 days HE ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL— ou are authorized to do the work as specified. Pa The above Prices. specifications and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. The will be mad* ade p ouffined above. Date of — 244-11 . nature: us if not accepted RECEIVED DATE : 09/14 09 :46'00 FROM :2067631690 MI • •• -25I MY WOO. Z57 MI WOO-258 MI WOO- 25 t MI LOX -2(DO r,. ., PARTNER'S CONST INC :206 -852 -7936 PARTNERS CONSTCTJON, INC SURD A LICENSE 1 PARTNC)O85NU • ASBESTOS ABATEMENT ASBESTOS LICENSE S 1172 • ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT Sep 14 S 6:20 P. 01 1313 SOUTH CENTRAL AyE: KENT. WASHINGTON 981132-7409 (206) 575.7429 FAX (253) 852 -7938 • GENERAL CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: McConkey Development 3006 Northup Way, Site 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 425- 889 -1180 Attn: Fred McConkey, CCIM DATE: SITE: September 14, 2000 Demo Site 14840 Pacific Highway South SeaTsc, WA 98188 Asbestos Abatement We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Provide labor and materials for removal and disposal of Asbestos Containing Materials as follows: Building "A ": Remove ACM from approximately 200 LF and 15-20 Fittings of Boiler Pipe. Remove approximately 150 SF ACM Vinyl from Unit 6 & 9. Remove approximately 60 SF VAT from Unit 2. pproxiamtely 5,000 SF ACM Texture from Walls in Unit 3,4,3&6. Remove avproximately 4500 SF ACM Plaster from through out Bultding. Remove approximately 8,500 SF ACM Roofing from Building, Building •B": Remove approximately 16 LF ACM from Boller Pipes. Remove approximately 340 SF ACM Vinyl from Unit 13 & 15. Remove approximately 3,000 SF ACM Roofing. Building "C" Contains No Asbestos. Then Is a TEN DAY Waiting Period after Permit le obtained. PCI Cannot Start the Project Prior to 10123(00. Building Owner to supply Power and Wad for Project. Note: ALL Cuanities were taken from Survey and Subject to Changes after Total Omits Inspection. ACM Piaster may NOT have to be Abated after Point Count Teat are Done resulting In f 9,000.00 Savings. All work to be done by certified workers strictly following all local, state and federal prices Include permits and required air monitoring, but do not include sales tax. regulations. These We Propose hereby to furnish material and tabor- campiete in accordance with above ThIrty -Soren Thousand Siztlundred And Twwrtty -Five Dollars ($ 7.6 6.00) �' fo. tfr. sum or: Payment to be made as follows: Balance Due in FuN On Completion. AN material Is guaranteed to be as specified. An work to be comphned in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any ail ration Or deviation Mom above specifics. Authorized on klvoiviee extra costs will be executed only upon written onlers, and will became an Si extra chortle over and above the estimate. An agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or _ insurance. worker care fully bey Worm nr 's Compensation Inserencs. sal Acceptance of Proposal . Tame above prices, apac;ficado,,, and condltiees are satisfactory and an hereby accepted. You are authorized to dolls work as specked. velment will be made as outlined above. A w. chine a/ 1" per month stamped nt on all pa due accounts plus collection f e if tt will tea 1epssery to utilize their services. is kite of acceptance: y — /f ' 2.40(.1 RECEIVED DATE : 09/14 06:15'00 FROM :2068527936 Can uraasa NOTE: This proPowil maybe withdrawn by we if not accepted with 34 days- Signature: CA /�, 'Aug-17-99 09:09A ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 Definitions RECEIVED CITY REC1314111JLA CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 1 3 2000 PERMIT CENTER PERMIT CENTER Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral fiber that was widely used in many materials and products until the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulated its use in the 1970s. Listed below are definitions for various terms used in this document. Asbestos- Containing Material An asbestos - containing material (ACM) is a material or product which contains more than one percent ( >1 %) asbestos. ACMs include building materials such as floor tile and acoustical "popcorn" ceiling material, as well as non- building products such as brake shoes, appliances, and heat - resistant clothing that contain more than one - percent asbestos. Asbestos- Containing Building Material An asbestos - containing building material (ACBM) is an ACM that is found on or in structural members of a building. ACBMs include (but are not limited to) the following: • Thermal system insulation (TSI) is material applied to pipes, pipe fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, water condensation, or for other purposes. • ,Surfacing materi.1 is material such as fireproofing and acoustical/decorative plaster that is sprayed - on, troweled -on, or othcrwise applied to surfaces of building structural members. • Miscellaneous materials are building materials on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor tile and mastic, sheet flooring, gypsum wallboard, cement board and piping (Transite), glued -on and suspended ceiling tiles, putty and caulking, gaskets, asphalt roofing material, and blown -in insulation. Presumed Asbestos - Containing Material According to U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Regulations, Construction Standards (29 CFR 1926.1101), Chapter 296 -62 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) a presumed asbestos - containing material (PACM) is defined as thermal system insulation and surfacing material found in buildings constructed no later than 1980. Friable Asbestos - Containing Material An ACM is considered more hazardous if it is in a friable condition. A friable material is one that can be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to powder under hand pressure when dry. Friable ACMs are considered more hazardous because they have a greater potential to release asbestos fibers into the air. If an ACM is in good condition, and is not disturbed, it is not considered an immediate health hazard. MI 2000 -251 MI 2.000- 257 M12000.258 M 1 2000- ze 111 2000 - 2100 RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:40'99 FROM : P_ 02 Aug -,17-99 09 z 1OA • J;:LLrZ:Uf 11 ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 2 1.2 Regulatory Background Asbestos is regulated at the federal level by the EPA and OSHA, at the state level by the Washington Department of Labor and Industries (L &I), and at the local level by regional air pollution control agencies including the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) which regulates asbestos air issues in Snohomish County. For counties without local air pollution control agencies, the Washington Department of Ecology regulates asbestos air issues. ACM surveys are required for renovation or demolition of buildings. Prior to the demolition of a building, federal, state, and local regulations require that an ACM survey be performed. For example, Washington state has a "Good Faith Inspection" requirement that is specified in Chapter 296 -62 -07721 WAC for buildings that are to be renovated or demolished. In part, WAC 296 -62 -07721 states, "Before authorizing or allowing any construction, renovation, remodeling, maintenance, repair, or demolition project, an owner or owner's agent shall perform, or cause to be performed, a good faith inspection to determine whether materials to be worked on or removed contain asbestos. The inspection shall be documented by a written report maintained on file and made available upon request to the director." Further, the EPA's Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan (40 CFR Part 763, Appendix C to Subpart E) states, "All persons who inspect for ACMs in schools or public and commercial buildings must be accredited." The EPA administered Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) established a program for managing asbestos in the nation's schools. Among other things, AHERA specifies sampling procedures (40 CFR 763.86) for materials suspected of containing asbestos. These sampling protocols have become industry standards. 1.3 Scope of Work The ACM survey for the three subject buildings included the following: • Survey conducted by an EPA AHERA certified building inspector. A copy of the building inspector's certification is included in Appendix A. • A visual survey for the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACMs. Bulk samples of the suspect ACMs were collected in accordance with 40 CFR 763.86. • Laboratory testing of the bulk samples using polarized light microscopy with dispersion staining (PLM/DS) to quantify asbestos content of the suspect ACMs. • Incorporation of the results of the survey for ACMs into this report that includes a description of survey methodology /sampling protocols; results of analytical testing; estimated quantities, conditions and friability of ACMs; sample and ACM location diagram; and recommendations. The ACM survey was limited to ACBMs, or ACMs found on or in structural members of the building. The ACM survey does not include ACMs that may be associated with non - structural building components such as appliances. RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:41'99 FROM : P. -03 Aug- 17 -99 09:1OA ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 3 2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The three subject buildings are located at 14840 Pacific Highway South in Tukwila, King County, Washington (see Figure 1 — Location Map). For this survey, the buildings are designated as Building A, Building B, and Building C. Building A is a two -level apartment building with a partial basement. The building has a reported 6,676 square feet and was constructed in 1942, according to King County Department of Assessment records. The building is of wood -frame construction. Building B is a one -story apartment building with a partial basement. According to assessment records, the building was constructed in 1948, and has 3,043 total square feet. Building B is of wood -frame construction. Building C is a single - family residence that was reportedly constructed in 1936. The building has a reported 602 square feet, and is of wood -frame construction. 3.0 SURVEY METHODS 3.1 Sampling Protocols The fieldwork for this survey was performed on July 30 and August 4, 1999. An initial walk through in and around the buildings was performed to locate materials that may contain asbestos. The observed suspect ACMs that were uniform in color and texture were grouped into homogenous areas or materials. For example, floor tile constitutes one homogeneous material or sample group, while wallboard constitutes another. Different colored or patterned floor tile each constitutes a separate homogeneous material. Sample locations were chosen in a random manner that were representative of each homogeneous material. In some cases, samples were obtained from damaged locations, if they existed, or from least noticeable locations. This was done to prevent further damage and to reduce the disfigurement of the material. The survey was performed using AHERA sampling protocols as required by PSAPCA for buildings that are to be renovated or demolished. Depending on the type of building material, AHERA specifies the number of samples to be obtained and analyzed if a suspect ACM is not assumed to contain asbestos. According to AHERA, a building material is classified by one of three categories - surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous materials. For surfacing materials such as "popcorn" ceiling material or fireproofing, AHERA specifies the number of samples to be obtained based upon square footage. This sampling scheme, which is lmown as the "3 -5 -7 Rule ", specifies the following: at least three samples be collected for each homogeneous material of surfacing material that is 1,000 square feet or less; at least five samples be collected from each homogeneous material of surfacing material that is 1,001 to 5,000 square feet; and at least seven samples be collected from each homogeneous material of surfacing material that is greater than 5,000 square feet. AHERA specifies a minimum of three samples be collected for each homogeneous area of TSI such as pipe, boiler, or duct insulation. For miscellaneous materials, such as floor tiles, sheet vinyl flooring, wallboard, and ceiling tiles, AHERA does not specify an exact number of samples to collect and analyze, only that samples be collected in a manner sufficient to determine whether a RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:42'99 FROM : P_04 g- 17 -99 09:11A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 4 material contains asbestos. A material is considered asbestos containing by the EPA and NWAPA, if any one sample from a homogeneous material contains more than one percent (1%) asbestos. 3.2 Laboratory Analytical Methods NVL Laboratories, Inc. (NVL) of Seattle, Washington performed the bulk sample analysis for this project. The NVL laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and Technology's National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The NVLAP certification number for NVL is 102063. All bulk samples were analyzed using test method 40 CPR ch. I (1 -1 -87 edition) Pt 763, Subpt. R App. A, pages 293 -299. A laboratory report detailing each sample analysis for samples collected by ADaPT is included in Appendix B. 4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS 4.1 Observations Buildi g A and Building B Building A and Building 13 are of wood -frame construction. Interior walls and ceilings are covered with a combination of gypsum wallboard and plaster. The floors are covered with various types of sheet vinyl flooring, 12 -inch floor tile, or carpeting. Heat for each building is provided by natural gas wall - mounted units. The buildings formerly had oil burning, hot water central heating systems that have been abandoned. Remnant heat system piping in the basements are covered with asbestos - containing TSI. The roofs of Building A and Building B are covered with asphalt. Some of the windows are glazed. The exterior sides of the buildings are covered with a combination of wood panels and plaster. The occupant of the southwest unit of Building A did not speak English, and did not allow ADaPT to access the unit. Additionally, the attic spaces of each building were not accessible as it would have required moving the personnel affects of tenants. Certain basement storage areas of Building B were padlocked and not accessible. Building C Building C is of wood -frame construction. Interior walls and ceilings are covered gypsum wallboard. The floors are covered with a combination of sheet flooring and carpeting. Heat for the building is provided by electric baseboards. ADaPT did not observe suspect TSI associated with Building C. The roof of Building C is covered with asphalt shingles. Some of the windows are glazed. The exterior sides of the building are covered with wood clapboards. The east portion of Building C was locked and not accessible. RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:42'99 FROM : P. ..05 Aug- .17 -99 09:11A • • -r ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 5 4.2 Summary of Findings Summaries of the ACM surveys for each building are presented in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3. The locations of the bulk samples collected by ADaPT are depicted on the Sample & ACM Location Plans. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING A No mogeneous Material Homogeneous Material Description and Location .. • it a E Asbestos Quantity c 2 e e. 9 Estimated 101 Aircell TSl in the basement and crawlspace. 243 55% chrysotile Fair to Poor Yes 200 linear feet 102 Mudded joint compound TSI on the fittings of Aircell -covered pipe nuns in the basement and crawlspace. 244 15% chrysotile 3% crocidolite Fair to Poor Yes 15 to 20 fittings 103 Sheet vinyl flooring with brown squares in the entryway and bathroom of Unit 1. 201 ND NA NA NA 104 Cove base and mastic in Unit 1. 202 ND NA NA NA 105 White, friable coating on the underside of the bathroom sink. 203 ND NA NA NA 106 Brown 12 -inch floor tiles in the bathroom of Unit 2. 205 4% chrysotile Good No 50 square feet 107 Brown 12 -inch floor tiles in the entryway of Unit 2. 207 5% chrysotile Good No 10 square feet 108 Sheet vinyl flooring with gray squares in the entryway of Unit 3. 208 ND NA NA NA 109 Sheet vinyl flooring with brown squares in the bathroom of Unit 3 209 ND NA NA NA 110 White and gold sheetvinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 4. 215 ND NA NA 1 NA 1 1 I Sheet vinyl flooring with small brown squares in the kitchen of Unit 4. 216 ND NA NA NA 112 Blue and white brick - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the entryway of Unit 5. 219 ND NA NA NA 113 Off - white, square- pattemed sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 5. 220 ND NA NA NA ND - None Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled 'All sample numbers have the prefix of 2505- RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:43'99 FROM : P_06 Aug -17 -99 09:12A • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 6 TABLE 1 CONTINUED SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING A Sample INumber* s •-• .. Esd o Mater Homogeneous Material Descripdon and Location Asbestos Quantity o U i E Quantity 114 Sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 5. 223 ND NA NA NA 115 Cove base and mastic in Unit 5. 224 ND NA NA NA 116 Off-white and gray sheet vinyl flooring in the entryway of Unit 6 225 ND NA NA NA 117 Brown. check - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 6. 226 ND NA NA NA 119 Orange sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 6. 227 60% chrysolite Good No 100 square feet 120 Yellow and orange sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 7. 231 ND NA NA NA 121 Rrnwn sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 7. 232 ND NA NA NA 122 Cove bast and mastic in Unit 6. 233 ND NA NA NA 123 Brown sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 9. 234 60% chrysotile Good No 50 square feet 124 Brown wall laminate in the bathroom of Unit 9. 235 ND NA NA NA 125 12 -inch floor tile in the kitchen of Unit 9. 236 ND NA NA NA 126 Sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 9, beneath a layer of floor tile. 238 ND NA NA NA 127 Floral- pattenered sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 8 239 ND NA NA NA 128 Blue and yellow sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 8. 240 ND NA NA NA 129 Cove Base and mastic in Unit 8. 241 ND NA NA NA 204 ND 130 Gypsum wallboard throughout the building. 230 ND NA NA NA 242 ND 211 ND 212 <1 %chrysotilc 131 Surfacing texture on the walls of Units 3, 4. 5, and 6. g 213 2% chrysotile �� Yes 5,000 square feet 218 <t %chrysotile 222 ND 229 4% ctvysotiie ^ice ND - None Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled •A11 sample numbers have the prefix of 2505 RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:43'99 FROM : P_07 'Aug— `17 -99 09:12A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 7 TABLE 1 CONTINUED SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING A Homogeneous 1 Material Y L = Estimated Homogeneous Material Description and Location o E Asbestos Quantity in = Quantity n Z o 206 ND 214 2%chrysotite 132 Plaster located throughout the building. 217 ND Good Yes 4.500 square feet 221 ND 228 ND 237 ND 133 Window glazing throughout the building. 245 ND NA NA NA 246 ND 247 ND 248 ND 134 Plaster covering portions of the building exterior 249 ND NA NA NA 250 <I7 chrysotile 251 ND 252 ND 2% chrysotile in 135 Asphalt roofing wih silver paint covering the deck of the roof 253 the paint & ND in the asphalt rooting Fair Yes 5.500 square feet 2% chrysotile in 136 Penetration mastic with silver paint on the roof parapet_ 254 the paint & ND in the mastic Fair Yes 500 square feet 2% chrysotile in 137 Penetration mastic with silver paint on the roof deck. 255 the paint & 15% chrysotile in the mastic Far to Good Yes l 50 square tea IND - Nonc Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled *All sample numbers have the prefix of 2505- RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:43'99 FROM : P.08 "ALig— ,17 -99 09 :12A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 8 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING B pc 6 o Homogeneous Material Description and Location Simple N umber* Asbestos Quantity o e Co d i Estimated Quantity i 201 Aircell TSI in the basement at the east end of the building. 139 55% chrysotile Fair to poor Yes 15 linear feet 202 Brown and white, square - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the entryway of Unit 11. 108 ND NA NA NA 203 Brown sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen and closet of Unit 11: the entryway and kitchen of Unit 12; the entryway of Unit 15: and the entryway, kitchen, and bathroom of []nit 17. 109 ND NA NA NA 204 Off-white sheet vinyl flooring in the bathroom of Unit 11. 110 ND NA NA NA 205 Cove base and mastic in Unit 12. 1 1 1 ND NA NA NA 206 Blue marble - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the entryway of Unit 14. 114 ND NA NA NA 207 Yellow sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen and bathroom of Unit 14 115 ND NA NA NA 208 Beige cove base and mastic in the Unit 14. 116 ND NA NA NA 209 Diamond- pattemed sheet vinyl flooring in the entryway of Unit 13. 118 ND NA NA NA 210 1exagonal- pattcrned sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 13. 119 55 % chrysotile Good No 120 square feet 211 Brown 12 -inch floor tile and associated mastic in the bathroom of Unit 13. 120 ND NA NA NA 212 Hexagonal - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the laundry room. 122 55% chrysotile Good No 50 square feet 213 Orange sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 15. 123 60% chrysotile Good No 120 square feet 214 Beige, octagonal- patterned sheet flooring in the bathroom of Unit 15. 124 60% chrysotile Good No 50 square feet 215 Brown, marble - patterned sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen of Unit 16, with a sub layer of floor tile and mastic. 126 ND in all layers NA NA NA `216 Brown, mosaic- patterned sheet vinyl flooing in the bathroom of Unit 16. 127 ND NA NA NA 217 Plaster located throughout the building interior. X111 ND NA NA a 112 ND 117 ND 121 ND NA 125 ND 128 ' ND 129 ND ND - None Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled 'All sample numbers have the prefix of 2505- RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:44'99 FROM : P 09 Aug- ,,1' -99 09 :13A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 9 { TABI..F. 2 CONTINUED SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING R Homogeneous Material a1.. v o a C. p Estimated Homogeneous Material Description and Location E 1 Asbestos Quantity o w Quantity Z V rx. 218 Gypsum wallboard in the laundry room. 130 ND NA NA NA 219 Window glazing throughout the building. 131 ND NA NA NA 132 ND 133 ND 134 ND , 135 ND 220 Plaster covering the building exterior NA NA NA 136 ND 137 ND 138 ND 221 Penetration mastic on the roof parapet. 140 ND NA NA NA 222 Asphalt roofing covering the roof deck. 141 13 %chrysotilc Good No 3.000 square feet 223 Pentration mastic on the roof deck. 142 ND NA NA NA 224 Asphalt roofing material with silver paint on the east portion of the roofdeck. 143 3% chrysolite Good No ;n HM 2_ included ND - None Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled 'All sample numbers have the pretax of 2505- RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:44'99 FROM : P_ 10 Aug -17 -99 09:13A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 10 TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF ACM SURVEY RESULTS FOR BUILDING C I Homogeneous Material Homogeneous Material Description and Location • Y iv 6 z' Asbestos Quantity 1 Condition P. °' a r.. Esdmated Quantity 301 Sheet vinyl flooring in the kitchen and bathroom. 101 ND NA NA NA 302 Cove base and mastic. 102 ND NA NA NA 303 Gypsum wallboard throughout the building. 103 ND NA NA NA 304 Surface layer of white asphalt shingles on the roof. 104 ND NA NA NA 305 Mid -layer of red and white asphalt shingles on the roof 105 ND NA NA NA 306 Bottom layer of green asphalt shingles on the roof. 106 ND NA NA NA 307 Window glazing on selected windows. 107 ND NA NA NA ND - None Detected NA - Not Applicable NS - Not Sampled 'All sample numbers have the prefix of 2505- The estimated ACM quantities given in the tables are based on measurements obtained during ADaPT's on- site reconnaissance. Asbestos abatement contractors should base their bids on independently obtained field measurements. 5.0 ASSESSMENT Two types of asbestos - containing TSI associated with the abandoned heating systems for Buildings A and B were found in the basements of each building. Corrugated cardboard TSI that is known by the trade name Aircell covers the abandoned pipes (Homogeneous Material or HM 101 in Building A and HM201 in Building B). The Aircell TSI contains 55% chrysotile. The Aircell and piping is approximately four to six inches in diameter, and ADaPT observed approximately 150 to 200 linear feet in Building A, and 15 linear feet in Building B. In Building A, the fittings of the Aircell TSI covered piping are covered with a mudded joint compound (HM 102) that was found to have 15% chrysotile and 3% crocidolite. ADaPT counted approximately 15 to 20 fittings in the basement of Building A. All of the observed TSI was in poor to fair condition, and is friable. It is possible that additional asbestos - containing TSI associated with the abandoned heating systems is hidden beneath or behind floors and ceilings of Building A and Building B. Asbestos was detected in six types of sheet vinyl flooring in portions of Buildings A and B including the kitchen of Unit 6 (HM 119), the bathroom of Unit 9 (HM 123), the kitchen of Unit 13 (HM 210), the Building B laundry room (HM 212), and the kitchen and bathroom of Unit 15 (HM 213 and HM 214). Refer to Table 1 and Table 2 for a description of each type or pattern of sheet flooring, and its specific location. The representative samples of each of the sheet vinyl floorings contained 55% to 60% chrysotile asbestos. The six types of sheet vinyl flooring were observed to be in good and non - friable conditions. RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:45'99 FROM : P. 11 'Aug -17 -99 09:14A '1. • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 11 The asbestos is in the fibrous backing of the sheet vinyl flooring, and not in the exposed, resilient surface layer. The total quantity of asbestos - containing sheet vinyl flooring in Buildings A and B is an estimated 500 square feet. Unit 2 of Building A had two types of brown, 12 -inch floor tiles that were found to contain asbestos. Both types of tile did not have associated mastic, as they appeared to be of the peel- and -stick variety. The floor tile of HM 106 is in the Unit 2 bathroom, was found to have 4% chrysotile, and covered approximately 50 square feet. The floor tile of HM 107 is in the entryway of Unit 2, was found to have 5% chrysotile, and covered approximately 10 square feet. The two types of floor tile were observed to be in relatively good condition and non - friable. Approximately 4,000 to 5,000 square feet of a surfacing texture (HM 131) is applied to certain walls of Units 3, 4, 5, and 6 in Building A. The quantity of asbestos detected in six samples of surfacing texture ranged from none detected to 4% chrysotile. The surfacing texture should be considered friable; however, it is coated with paint and hand pressure does not readily produce dust or dislodge it. Overall, ADaPT visually observed the surfacing texture to be in a good condition. Approximately 4,000 to 5,000 square feet of a plaster (HM 132) is applied certain to walls and ceilings of Building A. Only one of six samples (Sample 2505 -214) of the plaster had a detectable concentration of asbestos. That one sample had a quantity of 2% chrysotile. Overall, ADaPT visually observed the plaster to be in a good condition, but it should be considered friable. Silver paint that is applied to the asphalt roofing and penetration mastic of Building A was found to have 2% chrysotile asbestos in three separate samples. The silver paint is represented by three separate homogeneous materials (HM 135, HM 136, and HM 137), and is associated with the asphalt roofing and penetration mastic. The silver paint covers the entire roof of Building A, an estimated 5,000 to 6,000 square feet. Homogeneous material 137 corresponds to asphalt penetration mastic applied to the roof deck of Building A, around vents and superstructures. The quantity of asbestos detected in the sample of the penetration mastic was 15% chrysotile. ADaPT estimates that there is approximately 100 to 150 square feet of the penetration mastic. The penetration mastic was observed to be in a good and non- friable condition. Asphalt roofing covering the roof deck of Building B was found to have 13% chrysotile (HM 222). Included is a portion of the southern portion of the Building B roof that has a coating of silver paint (HM 224). The total quantity of asphalt roofing covering the roof deck is an estimated 3,000 square feet. The asphalt roofing material was observed to be in a good and non - friable condition. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The asbestos - containing Aircell and mudded joint compound TSI in Buildings A and B are friable and in fair to poor condition. To comply with federal and state worker protection regulations, the asbestos - containing TSI should be labeled, and access to the areas where it is present restricted. In their observed conditions, the various non -TSI ACMs pose no immediate health or environmental hazard, and there is no regulatory requirement that they be removed. Prior to their removal, any activities that will disturb the RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:46'99 FROM : P..12 Aug -1'7-99 09:14A • • L) u u b.:-• t1 ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 12 ACMs should be avoided. These activities include, but are not limited to, renovation, demolition, sanding, drilling, cutting, or abrading, especially using mechanical methods. Prior to the demolition of each building, the ACMs must be removed. The removal or abatement of surfacing materials and TSI is defined by federal and state regulations as Class I Asbestos Work. The removal of sheet vinyl flooring, floor tiles, and roofing material is defined as Class II Asbestos Work. Class I asbestos work requires the used of certified asbestos abatement workers. Depending upon the removal method, some Class II Asbestos Work may be conducted by personnel who are not certified asbestos abatement workers. Non - certified asbestos abatement workers that conduct Class II Asbestos Work are still required to adhere to worker protection regulations, such as the wearing of personal protective equipment and air monitoring. In addition, there are notifications that must be filed with PSAPCA and L &I, and there are waste transportation and disposal regulations that must be followed. For this reason, in ADaPT's opinion it would be prudent to contract with a licensed asbestos abatement contractor to remove all of the ACMs. P -13 The Building A positive samples that represent the surfacing texture of HM 131, the interior plaster of HM 132, and the silver paint of HMs 135, 136, and 137 were found to have a relatively low concentration of 2 -4% chrysotile. This asbestos quantity is relatively low and it is possible that the samples could be found to be non - asbestos- containing (no greater than 1% asbestos) by performing additional analysis known as point counting. Point counting is an analytical procedure that more accurately quantifies asbestos content in a sample with a low asbestos percentage, as compared to PLM/DS analysis. Based on past experience, ADaPT has found that in a majority of the cases, point counting will reduce the PLM/DS detected asbestos quantity in the 2-4% range, to 1% or less, thus rendering the ACM a non -ACM. Laboratories typically charge 530.00 per sample for point counting on a three to five day turn around. The ACM survey for each building was limited to accessible and exposed asbestos - containing building materials. ADaPT did not perform selective demolition of walls, floors and ceilings to assess for hidden ACMs, as the buildings were occupied when the fieldwork was conducted. Such an assessment will need to be performed after each building has been vacated, and may be combined with the designing of an abatement plan. Suspect ACMs that may be hidden include TSI associated with the Building A and Building B abandoned heat systems; sound dampening paper or felts beneath floors; tarpaper; wiring, and flooring materials beneath carpets. Areas not accessed, as noted in Section 4.1, will additionally require an assessment for ACMs. If during renovation/demolition activities, suspect ACMs are discovered that were not identified by this survey, work should be stopped until an assessment can be made regarding the actual asbestos content of the suspect ACM. With the exceptions noted in the previous paragraph, the sampling and tcsting performed for this ACM Survey complies with the "good faith inspection" requirements specified in Chapter 296 -62 -07721 of the WAC. This report must be made available to any contractor submitting a bid to undertake any work in the buildings, and this report must be present on site during such work. Chapter 296 -62 -07721 additionally requires that employer and building owners to label ACMs, notify employees of the presence of ACMs within a facility. Employees, such as maintenance personnel, that may contact or disturb ACMs must be appropriately trained. RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:46'99 FROM : ,,Aug -17 -99 09:15A • • ADaPT Engineering, Inc. McConkey Development ADaPT Job No. WA99 -2505 August 16, 1999 Page 13 If the ACMs are removed, both PSAPCA and L &I have permits or notifications that must be filed ten working days prior to the commencement of ACM abatement activities. Additionally, the PSAPCA permit has an associated fee. Finally, asbestos abatement contractors would likely require electrical power and water in the buildings in order to remove the ACMs. 6.0 LIMITATIONS While an EPA accredited AHERA building inspector performed the survey for ACMs, it should be noted that it does not constitute a strict AHERA style survey. However, the survey was performed and samples were collected in general accordance with EPA/AHERA guidelines for commercial buildings. Other limitations appear elsewhere in this report. ADaPT warrants that this ACM Survey was performed using generally accepted asbestos assessment practices. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of McConkey Development and their agents for specific application to the subject building. Use or reliance upon this report by a third is at their own risk. ADaPT does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to ADaPT. RECEIVED DATE : 08/17 09:47'99 FROM : P_14 • • PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington • GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. WA 98005 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747 -8561 McConkey Development Company 3006 Northup Way, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Fred McConkey Subject: Transmittal Letter Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. McConkey: March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Geotech Consultants, Inc. is pleased to present the results of our recently completed Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment for the subject property. Our work was completed in accordance with our proposal dated February 3, 1999. Please find the assessment attached. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to McConkey Development Company on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Shannan Spencer -Roth Environmental Assessor SSR: alt • PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Submitted by: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Shannan Spencer -Roth Environmental Assessor 3/417 (EXPIRES 8/17/ ?9 I James R. Finley, P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Special Terms and Conditions 2.2 Purpose and Scope of Work 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RECONNAISSANCE 3 3.1 Location and Legal Description 3.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics 3.3 Hazardous Materials 3.4 Other Conditions of Concern 4.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 6 4.1 Previous Environmental and Geotechnical Investigations 4.2 Historical Maps 4.3 Tax Assessor Records 4.4 Washington State Archives 4.5 Aerial Photographs 4.6 Interview 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 9 5.1 Regional Physiographic Conditions 5.2 Soil and Geologic Conditions 5.3 Hydrogeologic Conditions 6.0 RECORDS REVIEW 10 6.1 Federal Records Sources 6.2 State Records Sources 6.3 Local Agency Sources 6.4 Assumptions and Opinion of Contaminant Mobility and Site Vulnerability 7.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 12 7.1 Findings 7.2 Conclusions and Recommendations 7.3 Limitations 8.0 REFERENCES 14 ATTACHMENTS Plate 1 Plate 2 Plates 3 -5 Appendix Vicinity Map Site Plan Site Photographs VIS Site Assessment Report GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • • PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The subject site consists of two tax parcels that cover approximately 73,885 square feet of land. Pacific Highway South borders the property to the west and South 150th Street borders the property to the south. The (north)western parcel is developed with three buildings that consist of 16 apartment units and two commercial spaces. The buildings were constructed in 1942. The buildings have natural gas heat and one of the commercial spaces has an additional baseboard electric heater. The eastern parcel is undeveloped and covered with vegetation. Both parcels slope down to the east. Historical research indicates the apartments were originally constructed as a car park motel with a garage for each unit. Most of the garage spaces were converted into apartment units; one is the laundry room, and the remaining former garages are used for storage. The motel was heated by an oil- fueled furnace at one time and what appears to be a fill pipe for the underground heating fuel tank is located to the east of the southern building. Historical research of the eastern parcel indicates a small cabin for the subject motel was located on the northern end of the lot until sometime after 1974. The remainder of that lot has never been developed. Land use in the surrounding area is characterized by commercial development along the Pacific Highway South corridor with residential development to the east and west. Our investigation found evidence of three recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property: 1. Our research of the subject site indicates that the apartment -motel buildings were heated by an oil source at one time. It appears that a fill pipe to an underground storage tank is located to the east of the southern building, in the fenced -in storage area. More importantly, where tanks exist, the potential exists for petroleum- contaminated soil. 2. Based on the ages of the structures, the potential exists for asbestos - containing materials to be used in the building materials. 3. Again, based on the ages of the structures, the potential exists for lead -based paint to be on, or in the buildings. Additionally, the SouthTowne Auto Center at 14864 Pacific Highway South is listed with contaminated soil. This site is located adjacent to the southwest of the subject property. We reviewed the reports on file at the WDOE for this site. The reports indicated that contaminated soil was encountered when three underground storage tanks were removed. No groundwater was encountered and the contaminated soil was excavated and taken offsite for remediation. It does not appear that the contamination extended north to the subject site. Based on this information, it is our opinion that no further inquiry is warranted regarding this issue. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development ComflOy March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 2 This assessment did not reveal any additional recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. A discussion of the scope of our work, our site observations, and our conclusions are contained in this report. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment of the property at 14840 Pacific Highway South in Tukwila, Washington. 2.1 Special Terms and Conditions The level of effort regarding the identification of asbestos - containing materials (ACM) and potential lead -based paint (LBP) should be considered a reconnaissance and should not be confused with an asbestos or lead survey. The scope of work for our review of this site also did not include the examination, sampling, or analysis of subsurface soil or groundwater on the site for potential environmental contaminants. If new information is developed in future site work, which may include excavations, borings, or studies, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be given the opportunity to review the findings, re- evaluate the conclusions of this report, and provide amendments as required. 2.2 Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of an environmental assessment is to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA): that is, to make "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice." Our scope of work and the limitations of our study are consistent with American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Designation E1527: Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process. The objective of a Phase 1 assessment is to minimize potential future liability for environmental problems by demonstrating that at the time this report was prepared, the owner, holder, or buyer had no knowledge or reason to know that any hazardous substance had been released or disposed on, in, at, or near the property. An additional objective of the Phase 1 assessment is to identify potential contamination sources. The goal of the processes established by the ASTM is to identify recognized environmental conditions. The term "recognized environmental conditions" means the presence, or likely presence, of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or the material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate governmental agencies. Our study included: GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Comity March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 3 • A review of the chronology of ownership and site history, using county assessor records, archival property record cards, recent and historical maps, and aerial photography as primary resources. An attempt was made to identify possible former industries or uses presenting some probability of generating waste, which may have included dangerous or hazardous substances, as defined by state and federal laws and regulations. • A reconnaissance of the property to look for evidence of potential contamination in the form of soil stains, odors, vegetation stress, discarded drums, or discolored water. • The acquisition and review of available reports and other documentation pertaining to the subject property or nearby sites. • A review of a search by Vista Information Solutions, Inc. (VIS) of available state and federal government records. VIS reported those sites and businesses that are located within the minimum search distances specified by American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E1527. Additionally, through observations made during our site reconnaissance, we attempted to identify local topographic conditions that may influence the potential for regulated facilities to adversely impact the subject property. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND RECONNAISSANCE 3.1 Location and Legal Description Located at 14840 Pacific Highway South, the irregular- shaped or upside down "L "- shaped property totals approximately 73,885 square feet of land. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The property comprises two separate tax parcels situated in the northwest quarter of Section 22, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington. The tax parcel numbers as recorded by the King County Assessor's office are: '41;` ' Tax Lot Number Size in Square Feet <. , . Site Address ; „`:, .:,..:-,Vi 004100 -0130 (western parcel) 35,198 14840 Pacific Highway South 004100 -0310 (eastern parcel) 38,687 3700 South 150th Street 3.2 Site and Vicinity Characteristics An environmental assessor from our firm visited the property on February 11, 1999 to observe on- site conditions and land use practices in the surrounding area. Wayne Dawson, the current owner of the ( north)western parcel, accompanied us on our site visit. Commercial and residential development characterize land use in the immediate vicinity. Plate 2, the Site Plan, illustrates the subject property and the immediate vicinity, while Site Photographs of the subject property are provided as Plates 3 -5 of this report. 3.2.1 Site Improvements The (north)western lot is developed with a small apartment complex consisting of three residential buildings and a small garage. There are 16 living units and two commercial GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development ComS March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 4 spaces. The buildings were constructed into an eastern - facing slope so that the eastern end of the structures have below -grade storage spaces that are level with the eastern portion of the property. A laundry room is located in the northern building. A fenced -in storage area is located to the east of the southern building and encloses a storage building (former garage). The eastern lot of the property is undeveloped and densely covered with blackberry bushes and small deciduous trees. The City of Tukwila provides potable water, storm, and sanitary sewer services. At the time of our site visit, no major stains, odors, or unusual vegetative conditions that might indicate the potential presence of hazardous contamination were noted on the subject property or adjacent sites. 3.2.2 Building Materials Two of the motel buildings are wood - framed with stucco exteriors and built -up roofing. The exterior of Unit #1 has wood siding and asphalt composition roofing. The southern side of the southern building has wood siding exterior and the small garage is wood - framed with wood siding and built -up roofing. The interior materials consist of the following: Floors: carpet and vinyl Walls: plaster and plaster board. Wood in garage and storage spaces Ceiling: plaster and plaster board. Wood in garage and storage spaces Lighting: fluorescent and incandescent Heating: natural gas forced air and electric baseboard 3.2.3 Current Uses of Property As stated earlier in this report, the property is developed with three residential buildings and one storage garage. The buildings have 16 apartment units and two commercial spaces. One of the commercial spaces is a taxi dispatch and one space is occupied by a cafe. Several cars are located in the fenced -in storage area and building and maintenance materials are housed in the garage. 3.2.4 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties Commercial and residential development characterizes land use in the site vicinity. More specifically, the property is bordered as follows: North: Vacant property borders the site to the north. This property slopes down to the east - northeast. South: South 150th Street defines the southern border of the eastern lot. Two single - family residences and the SouthTowne Auto Rebuild define the southern border of the motel property (western lot). East: A house is to the southeast and mobile homes are on the land to the east. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. McConkey Development Comp. March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 5 West: Pacific Highway South, which slopes gently down to the north, defines the western border of the property. Restaurants, motels, and a church are to the west of the street. During our reconnaissance, we did not observe any readily apparent signs of improper storage or disposal practices of hazardous waste on any of the neighboring sites. See the Site Plan attached to this report as Plate 2 for the site area layout. 3.3 Hazardous Materials 3.3.1 Storage Tanks and Containers At the time of our site visit, we looked for evidence of underground or above - ground storage tanks on the subject parcel. We observed a potential fill pipe located to the east of the southern apartment building. Historical research indicates the motel was heated by an oil source at one time. A sump pump is located in the basement of the southern building to collect drainage. Several floor drains were also observed in this basement area, but appeared to be dry and not in use. 3.3.2 Asbestos - Containing Materials At the time of our site visit, we reviewed the interior and exterior finish materials for asbestos - containing materials. Due to the age of the structures, asbestos may be present in several building materials including vinyl flooring, plaster and plasterboard walls and ceilings, pipe wrapping, roofing materials, and window glazing. 3.3.3 Lead -Based Paint During the early to mid- 1900s, paint containing 30 to 40 percent lead was commonly used on the interior and exterior surfaces of buildings. Exposure to particles of lead - based paint (LBP), either through inhalation or ingestion, has been found to cause a variety of adverse human health effects. Children are particularly sensitive to these effects, and chronic exposure to lead can cause learning difficulties, mental retardation, and delayed neurological and physical development. In 1977, the Consumer Products Safety Commission banned consumer use of paint products that contain lead in excess of 0.06 percent. The current LBP standard, as defined by the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act and the Department of Housing and Community Development Act, Title 10, is any paint or other surface coating that contains lead in excess of 1.0 milligrams per centimeter squared or 0.5 percent by weight (5,000 parts per million). Based on the construction dates of the buildings, it is our opinion that at least some layers of the paint used contains lead in excess of 0.5 percent by weight. 3.3.4 PCBs Prior to 1979, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were widely used in electrical GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Com. March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 6 equipment, such as transformers, capacitors, switches, fluorescent light ballasts, and voltage regulators, owing to their excellent cooling properties. In 1976, the EPA initiated the regulation of PCBs through the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These regulations generally control the use, manufacture, storage, documentation, and disposal of PCBs. The EPA eventually banned PCB use in 1978, and the adoption of amendments to TSCA under Public Law 94 -469 in 1979 prohibited any further manufacturing of PCBs in the United States. Fluorescent lighting was observed throughout the buildings. Based on the age of the buildings, the fluorescent light ballasts may contain PCBs. In their current condition, however, the light ballasts do not pose a threat to human health or the environment. The only likely threat would come in the event that one of the sealed ballasts becomes ruptured. When removing or replacing bulbs, the light ballasts should be checked for labeling addressing PCB content. If there is no indication of PCB content, the light ballasts should be assumed to contain PCBs and properly disposed. We did not observe any transformers on the subject site. 3.3.5 Waste Generation and Disposal Garbage and recycling containers are stored in a fenced enclosure at the western end of the northern building. Service is contracted through Sea -Tac Disposal. 3.4 Other Conditions of Concern Radon is a naturally occurring, highly mobile, chemically inert, radioactive gas created through the . radioactive decay of uranium and thorium. The potential for the occurrence of radon varies widely and depends on: (1) the concentration of radioactive materials in the underlying bedrock, (2) the relative permeability of soils with respect to gases, and (3) the amount of fracturing or faulting in the surficial materials (EPA, 1987). The EPA has established a concentration for radon of 4 pico- Curies per liter (pC /I) of air as a maximum permissible concentration "action level" According to some studies, the average concentration in homes across the United States is on the order of 1.4 pC /I. Typically, the Puget Sound area of Washington is underlain by a consolidated thickness of glacial drift and rocks that do not contain radon - forming minerals. The Washington Department of Health, Division of Radiation Protection, published a study listing the King County average as 0.7 pC /I. Based on this information, it is our opinion that the potential for elevated levels of radon at this site is low. 4.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION Sources reviewed for information on site and area development and land use include previous reports, historic aerial photography, recent and historical maps, and resources of the King County Assessor's Office and the Puget Sound branch of the Washington State Archives. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Compi March 12, 1999 4.1 Previous Environmental and Geotechnical Investigations JN 99047A Page 7 Geotech Consultants, Inc. has not completed environmental engineering studies for the subject site. We were not provided with these types of documents for review. We are currently completing a geotechnical engineering study of the subject site. Our explorations consisted of three test borings and three test pits. The test pit explorations encountered topsoil overlying weathered till to approximately 4 feet below ground surface. Very dense glacial till was encountered below 4 feet. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 7 feet below the ground surface in both our boring and test pit explorations. 4.2 Historical Maps We reviewed Kroll Maps of the subject area dated 1942, 1953, and 1973. The 1942 map shows the northwestern lot of the subject site as part of three separate parcels. The subject portions of the lots are undeveloped. Only one house is to the southwest, at the northeastern corner of South 150th Street and Pacific Highway South, and one house is to the east of the eastern subject parcel. The 1953 map shows the northwestern parcel developed with the El Ray Motor Court motel consisting of four buildings. The eastern subject parcel is undeveloped. A service station and house are to the southwest and a house is to the west of the eastern parcel. Fourplex apartment buildings are to the south of South 150th Street and a cafe and auction house are to the north of the motel. Several buildings are to the west including a cafe, house, and a market. No major changes are visible on the 1973 map. 4.3 Tax Assessor Records The current taxpayer of the (north)western parcel is listed as Dawson Development Co., Inc. The current taxpayer of the eastern parcel is listed as Parmjit and Ranjit Khaira. The following table lists details concerning the subject property and adjacent Tots. :; :Address .41 _ o. :.:.:Tax parcel :number. Description: .. ,, .. ;, Date. x VBuilt 1, Heating, . System _ . . 14840 Pacific Highway South 001400 -0130 subject site motel - 3 buildings Dawson Development Co., Inc. 1942 electric baseboard 3700 South 150th Street 004100 -0310 subject site vacant -- -- 14818 Pacific Highway South 004100 -0143 north of site undeveloped -- — 3728 South 150th Street 957250 -0010 east of site single - family residence 1930 oil forced air 14862 Pacific Highway South 004100 -0325 southwest house 1928 electric baseboard 14864 Pacific Highway South 004100 -0321 southwest service building 1946 suspended heater GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Compe March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 8 Address Tax parcel . number :: Description Date Built ; -. Heating:., ' . Systeth :< 3723 South 150th Street 004100 -0540 fourplex apartments 1954 electric 1947 south 14862 Pacific Highway South southwest 1928, 1945 forced air 14835 Pacific Highway 004100 -0330 restaurant 1946 unlisted South west 14845 Pacific Highway 004100 -0335 motel 1979 unlisted South 4.4 Washington State Archives Records on file at the archives indicate the eastern parcel was developed with a small cabin that was moved to the site around 1956. This parcel was originally owned by John Shields and then purchased by Harry Atwood in 1945. The original owner of the northwestern parcel is listed as V. Gribble. Harry Atwood purchased it in 1945, Alec and P.F. Pelto purchased the motel in 1952 and Erwin Smith bought it in 1953. The archive records indicate that oil- fueled radiant heat was utilized for the motel buildings. It appears that an underground storage tank is still located to the east of the southern building. The heat system was later converted to natural gas, but the date is not given, sometime before 1971. Additional information regarding the subject site and adjacent properties is detailed below: " ADDRESS and , .? :LOCATION - YEAR DEVELOPED ' ' , ,. . . DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION 14840 and 14848 Pacific Highway South, northwestern parcel of subject site 1936, 1942 Auto court motel with three buildings and a garage. 14848 1/2 Pacific Highway South, eastern parcel of subject site 1956 cabin with stove heat. 14818 Pacific Highway South north of site 1947 cabinet shop turned into a furniture store and then burned down in 1970. 14862 Pacific Highway South southwest 1928, 1945 house and automotive garage. 3710 South 150th Street southwest 1928 house with stove and then electric baseboard heat 4.5 Aerial Photographs From a review of aerial photographs dated 1936, 1946, 1956, 1960, 1969, 1974, 1980, 1985, 1990, and 1995, it appears that the subject site was undeveloped in 1936. Development over the years is more specifically detailed below: 1936: The subject property is undeveloped and covered with vegetation. One house is to the southwest and one is to the east. The area is rural in nature. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Comp March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 9 1946: The (north)western parcel is developed with the motel buildings. The eastern parcel has a small cabin on its northern end. Houses and a commercial structure are to the southwest of the property and several commercial structures are to the north of the site. 1956: No major changes have occurred since the 1946 photograph. 1960: Cleared areas are to the east. The subject site remains the same. 1969: Increasing commercial development has occurred along Pacific Highway South. 1974: No major changes distinguish the area from the 1969 photograph. 1980: The eastern subject parcel is vacant and covered by vegetation. The subject site and area basically appear as they do today from the 1985 photograph to the 1995 photograph. A small cleared area is on the northern portion of the eastern property that appears to extend to the northwestern property in the 1990 photograph. This small cleared area is not visible in any of the other photographs. 4.6 Interview During our site reconnaissance, we interviewed the current owner of the apartments, Wayne Dawson. Mr. Dawson stated that he has owned the property for the last 14 years. To the best of his knowledge, the buildings have been heated by natural gas for the last 20 years and that the boiler and oil -fed furnace were taken out prior to his ownership. He stated that the underground heating fuel tank remained to the east of the southern building. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 5.1 Regional Physiographic Conditions The site is located in the Puget Sound Lowland geomorphic province, which consists mainly of glacially- deposited sediments. The Puget Sound Lowland is a basin lying between the Cascade Mountains to the east and the Olympic Mountains to the west. More specifically, the subject site lies in an upland referred to as the Des Moines Drift Upland. The ground surface of the site and immediate area generally slope down to the east while Pacific Highway South slopes gently down to the north. 5.2 Soil and Geologic Conditions Geologically, the subject property is located in an area mapped as "Qgt," which is referred to as ground moraine deposits which consist of compact, unoxidized glacial till. Till is described as a dense, glacially- compressed mixture of silt, sand, gravel, and clay. Typically, till exhibits relatively low vertical hydraulic conductivity and this frequently results in the formation of a perched GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Comp* March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 10 groundwater table along its upper contact. The "perched" water table (if present) is frequently seasonal and derives recharge primarily from the infiltration of precipitation through more permeable, overlying soil. Our subsurface explorations of the site confirmed the presence of glacial till. Perched water was encountered at approximately 7 feet below the ground surface, in between the weathered and unweathered till. 5.3 Hydrogeologic Conditions The geologic unit that characterizes the site is relatively impermeable. Based upon local drainage patterns and upon review of a U.S. Geological Survey map of the area, it is likely that the flow of surface, or shallow- seated subsurface, water across the property would be toward the east. According to a U.S. EPA Ground Water Handbook, shallow water tables typically conform to surface topography (Chapter 4, page 78). 6.0 RECORDS REVIEW Geotech Consultants, Inc. utilized the services of VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. (VIS) to complete a search of available state and federal government records. The VIS databases report those sites and businesses that are located within the minimum search distances specified by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E 1527. Additionally, through observations made during our site reconnaissance, we attempted to identify local topographic conditions that may influence the potential for regulated facilities to adversely impact the subject property. The databases searched by VIS, as well as the search areas applied to each, are summarized in the following sections. A copy of the VIS Site Assessment Report is included with this report as an appendix. 6.1 Federal Records Sources 6.1.1 NPL No sites within a one -mile radius of the subject property are found on the National Priority List. 6.1.2 CERCLIS A review of the EPA's CERCLIS listing reveals no sites within approximately one mile of the subject property that have been designated as potentially hazardous or eligible for participation in the Superfund cleanup program. 6.1.3 ERNS The subject property does not appear on the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) database of spill response activities. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Comp March 12, 1999 6.1.4 FINDS JN 99047A Page 11 A review of the Facility Index System (FINDS) listing and the EPA's RCRA Notifiers list, along with our site and area reconnaissance, reveals the subject site does not have RCRA- regulated businesses. One site adjacent to the southwest of the subject property, the SouthTowne Auto Rebuild at 14864 Pacific Highway South, and one site to the north of the subject property, Douglas Printing at 14818 Pacific Highway South, are listed as small quantity generators of non - acutely hazardous waste. Businesses named in the FINDS listing are users or generators of potentially hazardous or toxic materials as a normal aspect of their business practices. Listed businesses are required to closely monitor and report their use or generation of such materials to the EPA. Based on the monitoring and reporting requirements imposed by the EPA, on our review of the EPA Hazardous Waste Data Management System (HWDMS) compliance listing, and on the assumption that the listed users and generators exercise prudence in their management of these materials to minimize liability and EPA penalties, it is our opinion that the potential for the environmental impairment of the property from the listed businesses is very low. 6.1.5 TSD A review of the RCRIS -TSD list shows no sites within a one -half mile radius of the subject property. 6.2 State Records Sources 6.2.1 WDOE Underground Storage Tanks A review of the WDOE listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) reveals no registered USTs on, or adjacent to, the subject site. Heating oil USTs are exempt from regulations and are not required to be registered. 6.2.2 WDOE Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A review of the current Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) list indicates a total of six sites located within one -half mile of the subject property. One of these, SouthTowne Auto Rebuild, is located adjacent to the south of the site. Our review of records on file at the WDOE indicate three underground storage tanks were installed at the site in 1948 and removed in 1996. Contaminated soil was encountered during removal activities. Excavation of contaminated soil was completed in June of 1998 and a total of 325.54 tons of contaminated soil was taken to Remedco for remediation. No groundwater was encountered during tank removal or excavation activities. The contaminated soil was located to the west of the former residence and did not extend north or east to the subject site. Based on this information, the potential for this site to affect the subject property is low. It appears that none of the remaining sites are upgradient or adjacent to the subject site. Our review of U.S. Geological Survey topographic map for the area suggests that local GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Com. March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 12 drainage patterns of shallow groundwater flow are generally to the east, across the subject site (see the attached Vicinity Map, Plate 1). Based on the distances to the remaining five sites and their gradient locations relative to the subject property, it is our opinion that the potential for these sites to adversely impact the subject property is low. 6.2.3 WDOE Hazardous Site Listings A review of the WDOE statewide contaminated site reports shows no sites listed on the State Priority List (SPL), one site listed on the state CERCLIS list (SCL), and a total of seven sites listed on the Washington State Register of Toxics sites. Six of the Toxics sites are listed on either the other two state lists or on the LUST list. The remaining two sites are located over 1,000 feet west and crossgradient of the subject site. Based on the distances to these sites and the above information, it is our opinion that the potential for these sites to adversely impact the subject property is low. 6.3 Local Agency Sources A review of the King County Health Department records pertaining to current and abandoned landfills within the county indicates that no abandoned landfills are located within one -half mile of the subject property. 6.4 Assumptions and Opinion of Contaminant Mobility and Site Vulnerability One confirmed hazardous waste - contaminated site lies within 1,000 feet of the subject property in an upgradient hydraulic position. Review of available reports on file at the WDOE indicate the SouthTowne Auto Rebuild had contaminated soil on its site. However, the contaminated soil was removed as much as possible and it did not extend north or east to the subject site. It appears that some contaminated soil remains in a small area along Pacific Highway South. No groundwater was encountered. As such, it is our professional opinion that the potential for the migration of theoretical water -borne contamination onto the subject property remains low. 7.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION We performed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, consistent with the scope and limitations of ASTM Designation E 1527, for the property at Pacific Highway South and South 150th Street in Tukwila, Washington. 7.1 Findings Our investigation found evidence of three recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property: 1. Our research of the subject site indicates that the motel (apartments) was originally heated by an oil source. There is evidence of a potential tank located to the east of the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Compi March 12, 1999 JN 99047A Page 13 southern building. More importantly, where tanks exist, the potential exists for petroleum- contaminated soil. 2. Based on the ages of the buildings, the potential exists for asbestos - containing materials to be used in the construction materials. 3. Again, based on the ages of the structures, the potential exists for lead -based paint to be on, or in the buildings. 7.2 Conclusions and Recommendations 7.2.1 Underground Storage Tank Although underground storage tanks containing fuel oil for use on the premises are exempt from federal and state operating laws, there is liability under the State of Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) for contaminated soil caused by leakage. It is our understanding that the tank has not been used for at least 20 years. We recommend that the tank be removed and an assessment of the soil proximal to the tank be completed to confirm the presence or absence of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. UST removal could occur at redevelopment or prior to redevelopment of the property. However, the presence of contaminated soil could cause unforeseen costs and delays at the time of construction. 7.2.2 Asbestos - Containing Materials Based on the ages of the buildings, asbestos may be present in several construction materials. Suspect asbestos - containing materials include, but are not limited to, vinyl flooring and associated mastics and backings, plaster walls and ceilings, window glazing, pipe wrapping, and roofing materials. It is our understanding that further plans for the site include the demolition of the structures. State and federal regulations require the completion of an asbestos survey and the removal and disposal of any asbestos - containing materials by qualified personnel prior to demolition. Regulation III, Article 4, of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) rules require the completion of a demolition permit 10 days prior to demolition and an application for an asbestos removal permit 10 days prior to removal procedures. 7.2.3 Lead -Based Paint Based on the construction dates of the buildings, it is possible that lead -based paint (LBP) may be present. Adverse human health effects related to LBP generally occur due to (1) the ingestion of paint by small children, or (2) the inhalation of paint particles during removal, renovation, or demolition. Since future plans for the buildings include demolition we recommend notifying the appropriate contractor of the potential for LBP and following Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards during the activities. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development Comfy March 12, 1999 7.3 Limitations JN 99047A Page 14 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of McConkey Development Company, and its representatives, for specific application to this site. This work was performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area. Our work is in accordance with our Fee Schedule and General Conditions and our signed proposal, which is dated February 3, 1999. 8.0 REFERENCES Boateng & Associates, Inc. Remedial Action Report, SouthTowne Auto Rebuild. Job number 0062- 01- 01 -01. July 1998. Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey. Geologic Map of the Des Moines Quadrangle, Washington. Map GQ159. 1962. Division of Radiation Protection, Department of Health, State of Washington. Radiation Fact Sheet. Geotech Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study. Subject site. JN 99047. March 1999. Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA. U.S. EPA Ground Water Handbook - Volume 1: Ground Water and Contamination. EPA/625/6- 90/016a. September 1990. United States Geological Survey. Des Moines, Washington. 1:24,000 Quadrangle. 1 sheet. 1962. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • Inferred Direction of Shallow Groundwater Flow (Source: U.S. Geologic Survey map of the Des Moines Quadrangle, 1962) / 1i ,_4 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 4.-Lez----=2acw 1 N VICINITY MAP Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Job No: 99047A ( Date: I MARCH 1999 1 1PIate: 1 I View of commercial spaces, facing north View of southern apartment building, facing east SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Job No: Dale: Plate: I99047A MARCH 1999 3 View of northern apartment building, facing east View of storage lot, southeastern end of apartment property picture is facing south GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Job ,Vo: I I Date :: 99047A MARCH 1999 I Plate: 4 View of northern property border View of eastern lot, facing south SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Commercial Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington Job ,vo: Date: I I Plate: 99047A MARCH 1999 5 • • APPENDIX VISTA Site Assessment Report GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC. SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT PROPERTY INFORMATION Prosect Name!Ref;i<: 99047A Commerciai Property 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila. WA 98168 Latitude/Longitude: ( 47.469414, 122.285406 ) CLIENT INFORMATION Site Distribution Summary Agency / Database - Type of Records 1 1 within 1/8 1 mite I I 1/8 to 1/4 mile I I 1/4 to 1/2 mile 1/2 to 1 mile A) Databases searched to 1 mile: US EPA NPL National Priority List j 0 i 0 0 0 US EPA CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Actions and (T5D) associated TSD 0 0 1 STATE SPL State equivalent priority list 0 0 0 0 B) Databases searched to 1/2 mile: STATE SCL State equivalent CERCLIS list I 0 I j 1 i 0 I - US EPA CERCLIS / Sites currently or formerly under NFRAP review by US EPA • 0 I 1 0 I US EPA TSD RCRA permitted treatment, storage, disposal facilities 0 0 0 - STATE LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks 2 0 4 STATE SWLF Permitted as solid waste landfills, incinerators, or transfer stations 0 0 0 - STATE TOXICS Washington Site Register , 2 1 4 - C) Databases searched to 1/4 mile: STATE UST Registered underground storage tanks I 1 I i 2 I � i 2 - I I - 1 I i D) Databases searched to 1/8 mile: US EPA ERNS Emergency Response Notification System of spills j j 0 I• j - j - j - US EPA LG GEN RCRA registered large generators of hazardous waste 0 - - 1 - US EPA SM GEN RCRA registered small generators of hazardous waste 2 ( - I I { i I For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Page Al Report ID: 99047Aph1 Version 2.6.1 This report meets the ASTM stanZard E -1527 for standard federal and state overnment database :research in a Phase I environmental site assessment. A ( -) indicates a distance not searched because it exceeds these ASTM search parameters. UMITATION OF LIABILITY Customer proceeds at its own rick in choosing to rely on VISTA services, in whole or in part, prior to proceeding with any transaction. VISTA cannot be an insurer of the accuracy of the information, errors occurring in conversion of data, or for customer's use of data. VISTA and its affiliated companies, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors cannot be held liable for accuracy, fstorage, delivery, loss or expense suffered by customer resulting directly or indirectly from any information provided by VISTA NOTES For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 12 • SITE ASSESSMENT,EPORT Map of Sites within 1 Mile 4 j1 » 1F.nth ;. 1 0 0.25 0.5 Subject Site Category: Databases Searched to: Single Sites Multiple Sites Highways and Major Roads Roads Railroads Rivers or Water Bodies Utilities "I A 1 mi. • NPL, SPL, CORRACTS (TSD) B 1/2 mi. ■ CERCLIS\ NFRAP, TSD, LUST, SWLF, SCL C D 1/4 mi. 1/8 mi. UST ERNS, GENERATORS For More Information Call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Page ,a3 Report ID: 99047Aph1 • SITE ASSESSMENAEPORT Map of Sites within 1/4 Mile Category: Databases Searched to: Single Sites Multiple Sites Highways and Major Roads 1 Roads 1 Railroads Rivers or Water Bodies 1 Utilities A B 1 mi. 1/2 mi. • a ■ NPL, SPL, CERCLIS\ CORRACTS NFRAP, (TSD) TSD, LUST, SWLF, SCL C 1/4 mi. UST 0.05 0.1 Miles D 1/8 mi. ERNS, GENERATORS For More Information CaII VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403 Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Page *4 Highways and Major Roads Roads Railroads Rivers or Water Bodies Utilities For More information Cali VISTA information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - $00 - 767 - 0403 Report iD: 99047Aphi Date of Report: February 11, 1999 - et1 • SITE ASSESSMENTEPORT Street Map Highways and Major Roads Roads Railroads Rivers or Water Bodies Utilities For More information Cali VISTA information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - $00 - 767 - 0403 Report iD: 99047Aphi Date of Report: February 11, 1999 - et1 • • SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT SITE INVENTORY PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA B 1 1 M TSD LUST SWLF TOXICS I UST Iu LUST WiFr TOXICS I- N ERNS LG GEN SM-GEN- ISOUTHTOWNE AUTO REBUILD 3 3917091 1 1 1 i iX; IX I IX I ;DOUGLAS PRINTING 7 726176i I ' I XI 1 A B C D SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA 1S1 MAP1 (within 1/8 - 1/4 mile) :441 1 i ID i An i 10-1 01 1 1<1 i ce . DISTANCE10 VISTA ID, 1 cg 1 1 DIRECTION!Z 101v) 3 ; Fs! ;ARCO PRODUCTS CO 5515 PRESTIGE STA 5526 1847807; . ' ' • i I 3B 115252 PACIFIC HWY S 0.76mil . X 1 ' i !SEATTLE, WA 98188 Sw; . .TMARVIN D WELTY 57499851 5 114638 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH 0.14 Ml; 1 X NE SEATTLE, WA 98168 1 1TUKWILA MERCURY SPILL 7697340i 6 14014 S 152 ST o.ismii X SE1 1SEATTLE, WA 98188 1 1MINCHEW PROPERTY 39918091 ; 7 13025 150TH S 0.22 M11 XI . 1SEATAC, WA 98188 TSD LUST SWLF TOXICS I UST ERNS LG GEN ISM GEN X = search criteria; • = tag-along (beyond search criteria). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.7 Page 06 MAP ; tD ' SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mile) A C p i V' • !Q; VISTA ID C DISTANCE; a J O . a DIRECTION.Z1O;H ^~~ LUST ~~.r ERNS I 8 I +BP 03154 -30116 114415 PACIFIC HWY S i SEATTLE, WA 98168 4865316 ? ! 0.28 MI; i ! I • � I 8 !EXXON CO USA 77001 114415 PACIFIC HWY S (SEATTLE, WA 98168 18478021 i! 028 MI! N I I I 1 1 l 1 I i 1 I X I ► 1 I I• 9 ;WASHINGTON STATE PATROL- SEATTLE 115666 PACIFIC HWY S !SEATTLE, WA 98188 18478091 0.39 11 ! I ! I 1 X i I I I 10 1 SOUTHLAND #22866 Y S. 114207 PACIFIC HWY !SEATTLE, WA 98168 18478001 I I 0.42 MI 1 I NI I I I I I ! 1 I I 1 i I ! I X 1 I I 10 I7- ELEVEN FOOD STORE #22866 14207 PACIFIC HWY S 'SEATTLE, WA 98168 5749984; ; ; 0'42 MI! I I 1 ! I I I j X 1 • 1 11 'SHELL 114120 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH IccATTI P WA 9R'1 RR 69998811 1 0.48 M I N! ! I j i i! X IX ■ I I I! MAP ID SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/2 - 1 mile) A B D I,, IQ � N Iy1 I, "I Izi i U: v); al 1=1 VISTAIDi�I�; J 1ce DISTANCE. a I O o. V `u j DIRECTION, Z ! U . of 4.11 ! ISAFCO SOLVENT TREATMENT INC 364906; ! I 12 12212 5144TH !SEATTLE, WA 98168 0.82M11 IX' I ! 1 I I j 1 I I X = search criteria; • = tog along (beyond search criteria). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 17 I/ UNMAPPED SITES VISTA ID A ' 8 C D ii Z CORRACTS(TSD)1 SPL U y 10ERCLIS/NFRAP I II- tt 0:0 (41 2 h ITOXICS n ERNS LG GEN SM GEN PORT OF SEATTLE NOISE REMEDY 3629415 VARIOUS ADDRESSES SEATAC, WA X SEATAC PAN AMERICAN AIR 7248212 SEATAC INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SEATTLE, WA 98168 SEATAC PAN AM AV GAS TANKS 4266848 P.O. BOX 68727 SEATTLE, WA 98168 . X I SEATAC PAN AM FUEL FARM 7497934 SEATTLE, WA 98168 ! X X = search criteria; • = tog along (beyond search criteria). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 version 2.6.1 Page 18 SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT DETAILS PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) VISTA I SOUTHTOWNE AUTO REBUILD Address': 114864 PACIFIC HWY S i SEATTLE. WA 98168 !VISTA ID #: 391709 ! Distance /Direction:10.00 MI / NA Plotted as: Point I RCRA -SmGen - RCRA -Small Generator / SRC# 5078 I EPA ID: I WAD060053071 I Agency Address: SOUTHTOWNE AUTO REBUILD INC 14864 PACIFIC HWY 5 1 SEATTLE, WA 98168 Generator Cass: Generates less than 100 kg. /month of non - acutely hazardous waste. 1 STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# I EPA /Agency ID: I N/A j5207 I iAgency Address: SOUTHTOWNE AUTO REBUILO 14852 PACIFIC HWY S TUKWILA, WA 98168 1 Facility ID: 384081 I Leak ID #: 384233 Leak Report Date: 8i16 "96 I Remediation Status: CLEANUP STARTED 5/1/96 j Media Affected: sun Description / Comment: I-ACILIIY GUUNIY: KING; ALIERNAIIVE NAME: SOUIHIOWNL: AUTO REBUILD; ECOLOGY REGION. NW WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 l EPA /Agency ID: N/A i SOUIHTOWNE AUTO REBUILD !Agency Address: 148r,2 PACIFC HWY S. I SEATTLE, WA 98168 I Region: NORTHWEST 1 State Detail Description: No Contact: NOT REPORTED Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM. PRODUCT • Description: DAIS ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORI:8 /16!96 Description: MEUTA:SUIL I I Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM I Description: ISSUE OF SITE REC,ISTER:94 -36 Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5 /30/96 I Description: i Description: MEDIA:SOIL (Description: REPORT TYPE:INTE'RM"; ! rinc,- rintinn• ISSUE OF SITE REGIST£R:94 -48 Map ID 1 ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 09 PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT. .WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 ! EPA /Agency ID: Agency Address: Sc JUTHTOWNE AuT; i REBUILD 14862 PACIFIC HWY S. TUKWILA. WA 98168 NORTHWEST Region: 'State Detail Description: !Contact: `Description: Description: NO NOT REPORTED N/A WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT.8/13/98 j Description: MEDIA.SOIL i Description: Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:98 -07 VISTA I DOUGLAS PRINTING Address ": 114818 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE, WA 98168 ': RCRA- SmGen - RCRA -Small Generator Agency Address: 'Generator Class: !VISTA ID #: 126176 ! Distance /Direction:' 0.02 MI / N Plotted as: Point. / SRC# 5078 I EPA ID: DOUGLAS PRINTING LTD 14878 PACIFIC HWY 5 SEATTLE, bV.A 98159 Generates 100 kg. /month but less than 7000 kg. /month of non- acutely hazardous waste WAD060038262 i Map ID 2 VISTA ' DESIMONE'S Address": 15060 PACIFIC HWY S !SEATTLE, WA 98188 VISTA ID #: 5731964 Distance /Direction: 0.09 MI / SW ! Plotted as: Point !Agency ID: :11286 !STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 5206 Agency Address: Underground Tanks: Aboveground Tanks: !Tanks Removed: !Tank ID: (Tank Contents: !Tank Age: Tank Size (Units): Tank ID: ! Tank Contents: !Tank Age: !Tank Size (Units): !Tank ID: !Tank Contents: Tank Age: !Tank Size (Units): 10009 (GALLONS) (Tank ID: IU !Tank Contents: !Tank Age: !Tank Size (Units): SAME AS ABOVE 6 NOT REPORTED 3 ONEU UNLEADED GAS 7 5000 (GALLONS) THREEU LEADED GAS 7 10000 (GALLONS) TWOU UNLEADED GAS 7 •fl UNLEADED GAS 34 Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: ACTIVE/1N SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE STEEL ACTIVE /IN SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE STEEL ACTIVE /IN SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE STEEL NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: REMOVED NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Vernon 2.6.1 Page 010 Map ID 3A PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT AREA (within 1/8 mile) CONT. :Tank ID: Tank Contents: Tank Age: !Tank Size (Units): !Tank ID: ;Tank Contents: 1Tank Age: 'Tank Size (Units): STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# ; EPA /Agency ID: 15207 1 SAME AS ABOVE 71286 2479 2i; UNLEADED GAS 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) 3U LEADED GAS 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: REMOVED NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE REMOVED NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE N/A I Agency Address: i Facility ID: !Leak ID #: ;Leak Report Date: IRemediation Status: Media Affected: I Description / Comment: 7/16/97 CLEANUP STARTED 6./7./95 GROUND WATER FACILITY COUNTY: KING; ALTERNATIVE NAME: DESIMONE'S: ECOLOGY REGION: NW ';VISTA VISTA ID #: 16808120 1 NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING 'Address': ! 'Distance /Direction:'0.12 MI / W I - 13400 S 150TH ST I Plotted as: !Point ■ SEATTLE, WA 98158 I ! !WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 1 EPA /Agency ID: 1 N/A • i NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING FACILITY (TWO R Agency Address: 3400 S. 1SorH ST. SEATAC, WA 98158 !Region: NORTHWEST 1 N(7 i State Detail Description: !Contact: NOT REPORTED !Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT 1 Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:10 /20/92 MEDIA:SOIL !Description: REPORT TYPE:FINAL i Description: ne.errentenn• ISSUE OF Slit RlCISItR:92 -35 VISTA !NORTHWEST MOTOR WELDING Address': 13400 SO 150TH I 'SEATTLE, WA 98188 !STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 5206 i Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE 1 Underground Tanks: !Aboveground Tanks: Tanks Rernoved: (Tank ID: 1Tank Contents: 'Tank Age: Tank Size (Units): NOT REPORTED 1 !VISTA ID #: 302002 - Dist.ance /Direction:'0.12 MI / W Plotted as: • Point i !Agency ID: 1680 Map ID i4 Map 1D 4 7U HAZARDOUS 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: REMOVED NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE CONCRETE • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 111 r • SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 - 1/4 m10 VISTA Address': ARCO PRODUCTS CO 5515 PRESTIGE STA 5526 15252 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE, WA 98188 STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 5206 A enc Address: ARCO #5515 / P51 #5526 g y 15252 PACIFIC HWY 5 SEA / ILE, WA 98186 3 NOT REPORTED NOT REPORTED ;Underground Tanks: Aboveground Tanks: ;Tanks Removed: ;Tank ID: Tank Contents: Tank Age: I Tank Size (Units): ITank ID: !Tank Contents: !Tank Age: !Tank Size (Units): :Tank ID: !Tank Contents: 'Tank Age: 'Tank Size (Units): VISTA ID #: � 1847807 Distance /Direction:; 0.16 MI / SW Plotted as: Point 1 ! Agency ID: 199029 1 REGULA LEADED GAS 10 10000 (GALLONS) 2 UNLEAD UNLEADED GAS 70 10000 (GALLONS) 3 SIIPER11 UNLEADED GAS 10 10000 (GALLONS) Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: ACTIVE /IN SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC ACTIVE/IN SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC ACTIVE/IN SERVICE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC I VISTA MARVIN D WELTY Address": 114638 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98168 !STATE UST - State Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 5206 Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE Underground Tanks: Aboveground Tanks: !VISTA ID #: 15749985 Distance /Direction:10.14 MI / NE ;Plotted as: !point ;Agency ID: 112390 Tanks Removed:_ Tank ID: Tank Contents: Tank Age: Tank Size (Units): Tank ID: Tank Contents: Tank Age: Tank Size (Units): Tank ID: Tank Contents: Tank Age: Tank Size (Units): i 3 NOT REPORTED NOT REPORTED 1U OTHER 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) 2L1 OTHER 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) 3U OTHER 34 NOT REPORTED (NOT AVAILABLE) Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Tank Status: Leak Monitoring: Tank Piping: Tank Material: Map ID 5 CLOSED IN PLACE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE CLOSE!) IN PLACE NO1 AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE CLOSED IN PLACE Nor AVAILABLE NO/ AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Vernon 2.6.1 Page #12 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 - 1/4 mile) CONT. `VISTA Address': ;TUKWILA MERCURY SPILL ;4014S152ST SEATTLE WA 98188 :VISTA IN: I7597340 Distanc :e /DireC.tion :!0.19 MI / SE Plotted as: !Point Map ID ii 6 1 CERCLIS i I !Congressional 1 'Site i 1 1 / SRC# 5278 I !EPA ID: ! WA0002190171 Agency Address: g y EPA Region: District: Federal Facility: Facility Ownership: Incident Category: Federal Facility Docket: NPL Status: Incident Type: Proposed NPL Update #: Final NPL Update #: Financial Management System ID: Latitude: Longitude: Lat/Long Source: Lat /Long Accuracy: Dioxin Tier: USGS Hydro Unit: RCRA Indicator: TUKWILA MERCURY SPILL 4014 S. 152 ST TUKWILA. WA 9818B 10 9 Agency Code () NOT AVAILABLE unknown Agency Code ( ) NOT ON NPL Unknown 0 0 1015 0 0 Agency Code ( ) Unkrwwn Unknown 0 Unknown Unit Id: Unit Name: 0 SITEWIDE Type: DISCOVERY Qualifier: UNKNOWN Name: NOT REPORTED Plan Status: Unknown Lead Agency: Category: Actual Start Date: Actual Completion Date: EPA FUND.FINANCED Unknown NOT REPORTED JANUARY 77. 7996 Type: REMOVAL ACTION Qualifier: CLEAN UP Name: NOT REPORTED Plan Status: Unknown Lead Agency: Category: Actual Start Date: Actual Completion Date: EPA FUND-FINANCED Unknown JANUARY 17. 1996 JANUARY 17. 1996 i Name: Lead Agency: Actual Start Date: Actual Completion Date: NOT REPORTED FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT NOT REPORTED UNKNOWN VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information tali VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 173 SITES IN THSURROUNDING AREA (within 1/8 - 1/4 mil7'CONT. V STA MINCHEW PROPERTY Address': 13025 150TH S SEATAC, WA 98188 SCL - State Equivalent CERCLIS List / SRC# 4901 1 Agency Address: Status: 1 Facility Type: Lead Agency: !State Status: 1 Pollutant 1: !Pollutant 2: Pollutant 3: VISTA ID #: !3991809 1 Distance /Direct.ion:t0.22 MI / W Plotted as: ! Point !Agency ID: 12435 WARM I Map ID i 7 II SAME AS ABOVE UNKNOWN NOr AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE INDEPENDENT REMEDIAL ACTION,FTNAL INDEPENDENT RA REPORT RECEIVED HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS EPA PRIORITY POLLUTANTS- METALS CYANIDE METALS OTHER WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 Agency Address: Region: !State Detail Description: Contact: Description: Description: [Description: Description: !Description: [EPA /Agency ID: 1N /A MINCHEW /SYMM PROPERTY 3025 750TH S. TUKWILA, WA 98188 NORTHWEST NO NOT REPORTED WASIE.PETROLEUM PRODUCT WASTE:HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS WASTE: NON - HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS VAIL tCOLOGY RtCEIVEU REPORI:9 /7/93 MEDIA:SOIL Description: Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93 10 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mile) VISTA 1813 03154 -30116 Address': 114415 PACIFIC HWY S !SEATTLE, WA 98168 !STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground S 15207 !Agency Address: 1Facility ID: I Leak ID #: !Leak Report Date: ! Remediation Status: Media Affected: Description / Comment: torage Tank / SRC# !VISTAID #: !4865316 1 Distance /Direct.iOn:!0.28 MI / N I Plotted as: I Point ! I EPA /Agency ID: !N/A I I BP 03154-30116 14415 PACIFIC HWY 5 SEATTLE, WA 987684324 9575 2775 ! 1 Map ID II 77/8/91 CLEANUP STARTED 6/1/95 GROUND WATER FACILITY COUNTY: KING; ALTERNATIVE NAME: EXXON 7 7001; ECOLOGY REGION: NW 8 VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 114 1 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mil • ONT. VISTA EXXON CO USA 77001 ' Address'. 14415 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE, WA 98168 !VISTA ID #: 11847802 Distance /Direction:10.28 MI / N Piotted as: !Point I Map ID NA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 ; EPA /Agency ID: j N/A Agency Address: EXXON 17 70(17 14415 PACIFIC HvVr 5. SEATTLE. W.4 98168 Region: NORTHWEST State Detail Description: NO NOI REHORItL) Contact: Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT ■ Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:12/23/91 [Description: MEDIA: GROUNDWATER Description: MEDIA :SOIL j Description: REPORT TYPE :INTERIM 1 Description• ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:92 -74 Description: WASTE :PETROLEUM PRODUCT 1 Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:4 /13/92 Description: MEDIA:GROUNDWATER 1 Description: MEDIA:501± j Description: REPORT TYPE :INTERIM i Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:92 -22 I Description: '; Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:10 /13/92 __ DeSr .ri ption: MEDIA :GROUNDWATER Description: MEDIA :SOIL i I Description: REPORT TYPE :INIERlt.1 I Description: ISSUE OF S1IL REGiSiER:92-37 Description: WASTE :PETROLEUM PRODUCT DAZE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:3 /10/93 j Description i Description: MEDIA :GROUNDWATER Description: MEDIA: SOIL ;Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM I Description: I Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:92-4 7 WASTE :PETROLEUM PRODUCT I Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:2 /7/94 Description: MEDIA: GROUNDWA TER I Description: MEDIA:JOIL I Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERRIM Description: I Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93 -21 WASTE :PETROLEUM PRODUCT Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5./5 /94 I Description: MEDIA:GR711NDWATER j Description: tot ola'SOIL j Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIV nocr- rintinn• ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93 -24 _J 8 • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. - For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 175 SITES IN THE SURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mile)' ONT. Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: ! Description: :Description: Description: i Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: j Description: Description: ` Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: !Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: WASTE PETROLEUM PRODUCT n.4!L ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:8 /11/94 t,4 D;; :GROUNDWATER MEDIA: SOIL REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93-43 WASTE PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:1 /9/95 MEDIA:GROUNDWATER MEDIA: SOIL REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93 45 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:11/27/95 MEDIA: GROUNDWA TER MEDIA:SOIL • REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:94 19 WASrE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5/8/96 MEDIA. GRQUNOWA TER MEDIA:SOIL REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGIS fER.94.26 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT VAIL ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:7 /1 /96 TviE VIA . GROUNUWA TER MEDIA:SOIL REPORT TYPE:INIERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:94.34 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:2 /28/97 MED,A.GROUNDWATER MEDIA.SOIL REPORT TYPE:IN TERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:94 -51 WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 I EPA /Agency ID: ; N/A Agency Address: EXXON =7 7001 (TWO REPORTS) 14415 PACIFIC HWY S. SEATTLE. WA 98168 Region: NORTHWEST State Detail Description: NO Contact: NOT REPORTED !Description: i Description: Description: was TE.PETROLEUM PRODUCT MEDIA: GROUNDWA TER MED;A:SOIL 0 • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 version 2.6.1 Page 116 SITES IN TH RROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mile NT. Description: Description: Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93.17 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT ' Description: Description: ME DIA: GROUNDWA TER MEDIA:SOIL Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER.93 -23 Description: Description: I Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5/5194 MEDIA: GROUNDWATER Description: MEDIA:SOIL Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM 1 Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER.:93.27 VISTA 'WASHINGTON STATE PATROL - SEATTLE Address ': 15666 PACIFIC HWY S !VISTA ID #: 1 1847809 1Distanc.e/Direction:i MI / SW ni .... a • i Dnint ■ U wucu C..1.3• i SEATTLE, WA 98188 1 STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# ; EPA /Agency ID: j N/A 5207 I I WASHINGTON STATE PATROL - SEATTLE Agency Address: 15titi6 PACIFIC HWY S SEATTLE, WA 981882656 Facility ID: 7628 I Leak ID #: 4189 Leak Report Date: 12/23/92 Remediation Status: CLEANUP STARTED 12/23/92 Media Affected: SOIL I FACILITY COUNTY: KING : ALTERNATIVE NAME: WSP TUKWILA: ECOLOGY REGION: Description / Comment: NW I WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 I EPA /Agency ID: ; N/A I Agency Address: WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 15666 PACIFIC HWY S. TUKWILA, WA 98188 1 NORTHWEST !Region: State Detail Description: NO I Contact: NOT REPORTED I Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT I Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:3 /12/93 MEDIA:SOIL Description: '• Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM Description: !SSLIt C11- Silt 111-,G511:14 92-47 I Description: WASTE PETROLEUM ETROLEUM PRODUCT !Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:3/ 17/93 I Description: MEDIA:SOIL Description: REPORT TYPE:FINAL I nner•rintinn• IS SI IE OF SITE REGISTER:92 -49 J - • VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 017 SITES IN TH•RROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 mil DNT. VITA SOUTHLAND #22866 ,Address': 14207 PACIFIC HWY S. VISTA ID#: 11847800 ! Distance /Direction:10.42 MI / N Plotted as: 1 Point I f Map ID II J10 IVA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 I EPA /Agency ID: I N/A Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE Region: NORTHWEST State Detail Description: NO Contact: NOT REPORTED i Description: WASTE.PETROLEUM PRODUCT Description: MEDIA:GROUNDWATER Description: MEDIA SOIL Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM I Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:95 -12 I i Description: WASTE.PETROLEUM PRODUCT 1 Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5 /30/96 I Description: MEDIA:GROUNDWATER MEDIA: SOIL Description: Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM I Description: ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER :94 -37 I Description: WASTE. PE PRODUCT I Description: Description: DALE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:4 /24/97 MEDIA:GROUNDWATER rDescription: MEDIA:SOIL Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM 1 i Description: ISSI l£ OF SITE RE(;ISTER :9.5 01 Description: I Description: I Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DArE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPOR1:2/ 14/97 MEDIA:GROUNDWATER -- --� I Description: MEDIA :SOIL : Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSIIE OF SITE REGISTER :95 01 VISTA i Ad di ASS -: 1 STATE LUST 5207 7- ELEVEN FOOD STORE #22866 i 14207 PACIFIC HWY S !SEATTLE, WA 98168 State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# 1VISTA ID #: 15749984 Distance /Direction:!0.42 MI / N Plotted as: ; Point 1 EPA /Agency ID: !N/A 1 1 Map ID 10 i Agency Address: Facility ID: Leak ID #: SAME AS ABOVE 8603 324117 i Leak Report Date: 11/5.95 Remediation Status: Media Affected: Description / Comment: AWAITING CLEANUP 11/27/95 GROUND WATER FACILITY COUNTY: KING: ALTERNATIVE NAME: SOUTHLAND 7-11 # 22866:ECOLOGY REGION: NW ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page /18 SITES IN TOURROUNDING AREA (within 1/4 - 1/2 miIlIONT. VISTA SHELL !VISTA ID #: !6999881 r1; ,,- c. /rlirG -'rir n n dR MI . Address': 14120 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH I - :Plotted as: ; Point 1 SEATTLE, WA 98168 STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# ! EPA /Agency ID: !N/A 5207 !Agency Address: SHELL 14120 PACIFIC HWY SOUTH TUKW!LA, WA ;Facility ID: 414740 !Leak ID #: 414743 !Leak Report Date: 5/20/97 ! Remediation Status: AWAITING CLEANUP 5/20/97 !Media Affected: SOIL 1 1 Description / Comment: FACILITY COUNTY: KING: ECOLOGY REGION: NW WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 I EPA /Agency ID: I N/A !Agency Address: SEATAC MOTORS SHELL OIL (TWO REPORTS) 14120 PACIFIC HWY S. ! SEATTLE. WA 98168 ;Region: NOKIHWESI ! State Detail Description: NO ! Contact: NOT REPORTED ! Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:8/6/97 Description: I Description: tv1E Lk; .SOIL ! Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM Description: ISSIJE OF SITE REGISTER:95.07 {WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 !EPA /Agency ID: 1N /A Agency Address: SEAIAC MOTORS /SHELL OIL 14120 PACIFIC: HWY S. SEATTLE. WA98168 ! Region: NORTHWEST !State Detail Description: NO I Contact: NOT REPORTED I Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:5 /22197 ! Description: MEDIA:SOIL ! Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM r1.,ce- rir,*;r,r• ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:94.54 '4•• Map ID 11 VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information cell VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 119 VISA .SAFCO SOLVENT TREATMENT INC A<iclirtss-: 2212 S 144TH !SEATTLE, WA 98168 CORRACTS / SRC# 5078 Agency Address: VISTA ID#: 1364906 !Distance /Direction:0.82 MI / W Plotted as: :Point EPA ID: ! WAD980974869 ! Map ID 12 JI Prioritization Status: RCRA Facility Assessment Completed: I Notice of Contamination: Determination of need For a RFI (RCRA Facility Investigation): RFI Imposed: RFI Workplan Notice of Deficiency Issued: RFI Workplan Approved: RFI Report Received: RFI Approved: No Further Corrective Action at this Time: Stabilization Mesaures Evaluation: CMS (Corrective Measure Study) Imposition: CMS Workplan Approved: CMS Report Received: CMS Approved: Date for Remedy Selection (CM Imposed): Corrective Measures Design Approved: Corrective Measures Investigation Workplan Approved: Certification of Remedy Completion: Stabilization Measures Implementation: Stabilization Measures Completed: Corrective Action Process Termination: SAFCO ENVIRONMENTAL 2212 5 144TH SEATTLE. WA 98168 LOW YES NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NC) NO NO ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 020 UNMAPPED SITES • VISTA PORT OF SEATTLE NOISE REMEDY VISTA ID #: ; 3629415 Address': VARIOUS ADDRESSES j SEATAC, WA I EPA /A _ anc ID: N/A STATE LUST - State Leaking Underground Storage Tank / SRC# I g y 15207 ' SAME AS ABOVE 200753 3120 Agency Address: !Facility ID: Leak ID #: !Leak Report Date: Remediation Status: 10/37/91 CLEANUP STARTED 5/21/95 i Media Affected: Description / Comment: SOIL FACILITY COUNTY: KING; ALTERNATIVE NAME: PORT OF SEATTLE NOISE REMEDY; ECOLOGY REGION: NW i I VISTA ID #: 7248212 !VISTA SEATAC PAN AM AV GAS Address ": i 'P.O. BOX 68727 j I SEATTLE, WA 98168 VISTA I SEATAC PAN AMERICAN AIR Address": SEATAC INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT : j SEATTLE, WA 98168 f 1 WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 1 EPA /Agency ID: 'N/A INA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 !EPA/Agency ID: 1, N/A Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE I Region: NORTHWEST NO State Detail Description: I Contact: NOT REPORTED `_ Description: 'VVa51E:PE IROLEUM PRODUCT !Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT :10/4/91 Description: MEDIA.SOIL ! Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SIrE REC4ISTER:92 08 TANKS 'VISTA ID #: 4266848 !VISTA SEATAC PAN AM AV GAS Address ": i 'P.O. BOX 68727 j I SEATTLE, WA 98168 1 WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 1 EPA /Agency ID: 'N/A Agency Address: SEATAC PAN AM AV GAS TANKS P.O. BOX 68727 SEATAC, WA 98158 ! Region: NORTHWEST jState Detail Description: NO Contact: NOT REPORTED WASTE :PETROLEUM PRODUCT Description: Description: DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:1 /21 /93 I MEDIA: SOIL Description: Description: REPORT TYPE:INTERIM n„�„.; „ +;,, „• ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER :92.45 * VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page #21 UNMAPPED SITES CONT. • WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 SAM. AS ABOVE NORTH:A EST NO NOT REPORTED Agency Address: Region: State Detail Description: Contact: Description: Description: Description: I Description: Description: Description: ! Description: !Description: Description: Description: i Description: Description: escri ption: Description: Description: ;Description: ;EPA /Agency ID:. `:N /A WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT: 12/29/92 MEDIA.:SOIL REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:92 -41 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:10 /31/94 MEDIA: GROt INDWATER MtLNA:SOIL REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:93.41 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:10 /28/92 MEDIA: SOIL HE POHI I YPt:IN I E HIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:92 -38 VISTA Aildtess ": I WA Toxics - Washington Toxics / SRC# 5293 Agency Address: SAME AS ABOVE !Description: WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT i Description: II Description: Description: Description: !, Description: !Description: Description: MEDIA:SOIL Description: I Description: I Region: State Detail Description: i Contact: SEATAC PAN AM FUEL FARM 1SEATTLE, WA 98168 VISTA ID #: EPA /Agency ID: ;7497934 N/A DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT:10 /24/97 MEDIA:SOIL REPORT TYPE.INTERLM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:95-16 WASTE:PETROLEUM PRODUCT DATE ECOLOGY RECEIVED REPORT: 12/26/96 REPORT TYPE:INTERIM ISSUE OF SITE REGISTER:95 16 NORTHWEST NO NOT REPORTED ' VISTA address includes enhanced city and ZIP. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page #22 SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT DESCRIPTION OF DATABASES SEARCHED A) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1 MILE VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile. of your property. The agency release date for NPL was October, 1998. The National Priorities List (NPL) is the EPA's database of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for priority remedial actions under the Superfund program. A site roust meet. or surpass a predetermined hazard ranking system score, be chosen as a state's top priority site, or meet three specific criteria set jointly by the (IS Dept. of Health and Human Services and the US EPA in order to become an NPL site. NPL SRC #: 5280 SPL SRC #: 4902 CORRACTS SRC #: 5078 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. The agency release date for Confirmed Contaminated Sites Report was June, 1998. The Washington Confirmed Contaminated Sites Report contains a WARM (Washington Ranking Mode!) BIN Number of 0 -5 which is assigned to an NPL site designating it as a State Priority Site. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 mile of your property. The agency release date for HWDMS /RCRIS was August, 1998. The EPA maintains this database of RCRA facilities which are undergoing "corrective :- ,cation'. A "corrective action order" is issued pursuant to RCRA Section 3008 (h) when there has been a release of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment from a RCRA facility. Corrective actions may be required beyond the facility's boundary and can be required tegardless of when the release occurred, even if it predates RCRA. 1B) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/2 MILE CERCLIS VISTA conducts a database search to identify al! sites within 1/2 n of your property. SRC #: 5278 The agency release date for CERCLIS was October, 1998. The CERCLIS List contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The information on each site includes a history of all pre- remedial, remedial, removal and community relations activiies or events at the site, financial funding information for the events, and unrestricted enforcement activities. NFRAP VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1 /2 mile of your property. SRC#: 5279, The agency release date for CERCLIS - NFRAP.was October, 1998. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page #23 SCL SRC #: 4901 RCRA -TSD SRC #: 5078 SWLF SRC #: 4383 VISTA conduc�dat.abase search to identify all sites wit. /2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Suspected Contaminated Sites Report was June, 1998. The Washington Suspected Contaminated Sites Report is not assigned a WARM (Washington Ranking Mode!) BIN Number; designating these sites a contaminated site. The Washington Affected Media and Contaminants Report. includes sites in the following categories: (1) National Priorities List (NPL) Sites, Federal Lead; (2) National Priorities List (NPL) Sites. State Lead: (3) State Sites. Confirmed Hazardous Substances Sites (sites where the presence of hazardous Substances has been confirmed by laboratory or field determinations; (4) Potential Hazardous Substance Sites, these sites have ben reported to the Department of Ecology and further investigation including sampling is underway; (5) State Sites Under- going Lang -Terra Monitoring; and (6) Sites For Which Cleanup is Complete. This report includes some leaking underground storage tank sites. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for HWDMS /RCRIS was August, 1998. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA TSDs are facilities which treat, store and /or dispose of hazardous waste. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/2 mile of your property. The agency release date for Municipal Solid Waste Facilities was January, 1998. This database is provided by the Department of Ecology, Solid Waste Services Program. The agency may be contacted at: 360- 407 -6133. The Washington Solid Waste Inventory- does not. provide facility locations. LUST VISTA conducts a database search too identify al! sites within 1/2 mile of your property. SRC #: 5207 The agency release date for Leaking Underground Storage Tank List was September, 1998. This database is provided by the Department of Ecology, Toxics Cleanup Program. The agency may be contacted at: 360- 4077179 . The Washington Department of Ecology Leaking Underground Storage Tank List contains some of the same sites included on the Regional lists. This list is being used because there are some "new sites and it includes a site identification number. Because two lists are being used, sites may be reporting twice. For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page #24 WA Site Register SRC #: 5293 VISTA coneluc : a database search to identify all sites WOO 1/2 miie of your property. The agency release date for Toxic Cleanup Program Site Register was October, 1998. This database is provided by the Department of Ecology, Toxics Cleanup Program. The agency may be contacted at: 360 -407 -7200, The Washington Site Register Toxics Cleanup Program report details activities related to the study and cleanup of hazardous waste sites under the Mode! Toxics Control Act. Note that the State of Washington cautions that information contained under the Site Description is summarized information from an Independent Report and the Department of Ecology is not responsible for the accuracy of these reports. This report includes some leaking underground storage tank sites. C) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/4 MILE usrs SRC #: 5206 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/4 mile of your property. The agency release date for Underground Storage Tank Database was September, 1998. This database is provided by the Department.of Ecology, Solid Hazardous Waste Program. The agency may be contacted al: 360 -407 -7179; Caution -Many states do not require registration of heating oil tanks, especially those used for residential purposes. D) DATABASES SEARCHED TO 1/8 MILE ERNS SRC #: 4939 RCRA -LgGen SRC #: 5078 VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. The agency release date for was July, 1998. The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a national database used to collect information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. The database contains information from spit! reports made to federal authorities including the EPA, the US Coast Guard, the National Response Center and the Departrnent of transportation. A search of the database records for the period October 1986 through January 1998 revealed information regarding reported spills of oil or hazardous substances in the stated area. VISTA conducts a database search to identify all sites within 1/8 mile of your property. The agency release date for HWDMS /RCRIS was August, 1998. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. (RCRA) Program) identifies aril tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Large Generators are facilities which generate at !east 1000 kg. /month of non - acutely hazardous waste (or 1 kg. /month of acutely hazardous waste). For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 025 RCRA -SmGen SRC #: 5078 VISTA conduc a database search to identify all sites wii 1/8 mile of your property. The agency release date for HWDMS /RCRIS was August, 1998. The EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Program identifies and tracks hazardous waste from the point of generation to the point of disposal. The RCRA Facilities database is a compilation by the EPA of facilities which report generation, storage, transportation, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA Small and Very Small generators are facilities which generate less than 1000 kg. /month of non - acutely hazardous waste. End of Report l i For more information call VISTA Information Solutions, Inc. at 1 - 800 - 767 - 0403. Report ID: 99047Aph1 Date of Report: February 11, 1999 Version 2.6.1 Page 126 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street. Suite 16 Bellevue. \V.-A 98()))5 (425) 747 -5618 FAX (4251747-8561 McConkey Development 3006 Northup Way, Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Attention: Fred McConkey • • Subject: Transmittal Letter Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Commercial Development CLAD 34480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Dear Mr. McConkey: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed commercial development in Tukwila, Washington. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork and design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P -4806, dated February 3, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with three test pits and three test borings that encountered 3 to 4 feet of loose topsoil and weathered, silty, gravelly sand overlying very dense, silty, gravelly sand. The proposed structures may be supported on conventional foundations bearing directly on the dense, native soils. Because the native soils are silty and therefore moisture sensitive, earthwork operations conducted during wet weather will likely be difficult and expensive. The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. J.RF: alt Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. 0-4 James R. Finley, P.E. Principal RECEIVED OCT 1 9 2000 .OMMUNITy C VELOPMENT • • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Commercial Development 14840 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed commercial development in Tukwila, Washington. The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. Based on conversations with Fred McConkey, we understand that the development will consist of a car wash on the western portion of the site, in the location of the existing motel. The remainder of the site will be developed with a small hotel. Final site grading was not available. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The irregularly- shaped site is currently developed on its western side with a motel. The motel, which has several outbuildings, is accessed from Pacific Highway South. An asphalt parking lot is located on the western side of the buildings. The undeveloped portion of the lot is covered with thick blackberry bushes and Scotch broom. Both lots are relatively flat. The parcel is bounded on its western side by Pacific Highway South, and on its south by South 150th Street. An auto service station and vehicle storage area are located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Pacific Highway South and South 150th Street. This property is separately owned. A vacant lot and some commercial development are located to the site's north, and on the east are single - family residences. Subsurface The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating three test pits and drilling three borings at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. Our exploration program was based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. - The test pits were excavated on February 16, 1999 with a rubber -tired backhoe. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 6 and 7. The borings were drilled on February 19, 1999, using a truck - mounted, hollow -stem auger drill. Samples were taken at 5 -foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split -spoon sampler, which has a 2 -inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plates 3 through 5. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 2 The test pits and borings encountered 3 to 4 feet of loose topsoil and weathered, silty, gravelly sand overlying gray, very dense, silty, gravelly sand. This very dense soil, which has been consolidated by glacial ice, is referred to in this report as glacial till. Very dense glacial till was encountered to the maximum explored depth of 25 feet. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the Togs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. If a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the borings, the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit and test boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation and drilling. The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. Groundwater Perched groundwater seepage was observed at a depth of 3 to 8 feet. The test pits and borings were left open for only a short time period - Therefore, the seepage levels on the logs represent the location of transient water seepage and may not indicate the static groundwater level. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors. We anticipate that groundwater could be found in pockets within the till and between the near - surface weathered soil and the underlying, denser glacial till. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on our exploration at the subject site, it is our opinion that the proposed commercial development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The proposed structures may be supported by conventional foundations bearing directly on the native, very dense glial till soils. Depending on the final site grading, a small amount of overexcavation may be required to expose competent soils for the footing subgrades. These overexcavations may be backfilled with structural fill or with lean -mix concrete. Groundwater was encountered at relatively shallow depths. However, because only small quantities of groundwater were found perched between the upper, weathered soils and the underlying, denser soils, simple dewatering of excavations should be adequate. A significant geotechnical consideration for development of this site is the overly moist to wet condition of the silty soils. These fine- grained, silty soils are sensitive to moisture, which makes them impossible to adequately compact when they have moisture contents even 2 to 3 percent above their optimum moisture content. The reuse of these soils as structural fill to level the site will only be successful during hot, dry weather. Aeration of each loose lift of soil will be required to dry it before the lift is compacted. Alternatively, the soil could be chemically dried by adding lime, kiln GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 3 dust, or cement. Regardless of the method of drying, the earthwork process will be slowed dramatically. The earthwork contractor must be prepared to rework areas that don't achieve proper compaction due to high moisture content. Utility trench backfill in structural areas, such as pavements, must also be dried before it can be adequately compacted. Improper compaction of backfill in utility trenches and around control structures is a common reason for pavement distress and failures. Imported granular fill will be needed wherever it is not possible to dry the on -site soils sufficiently before compaction. The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the weather conditions that are encountered. While site clearing will expose a large area of bare soil, the erosion potential on the site is relatively low due to the gentle slope of the ground. We anticipate that a silt fence will be needed around the downslope side of any cleared areas. Rocked construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of mud carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. Conventional Foundations The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on undisturbed, native glacial till soil, or on structural fill placed above this competent, native soil. See the later sub - section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Adequate compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16 inches, respectively. They should be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose competent, native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 2- foot -wide footing must be at least 4 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing. An allowable bearing pressure of 5,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings supported on competent, native glacial till soils located 3 to 4 feet below the existing ground surface. Footings placed on weathered glacial till or on structural fill should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. A one -third increase in these design bearing pressures GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 4 may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post - construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soil, or on structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be about one -half inch. Lateral Toads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter : .: Design Value .:.:.` Coefficient of Friction 0.50 Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Where: (I) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (11) passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. Seismic Considerations The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16 -2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16 -J of the 1997 UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by Soil Profile Type Sc (Very Dense Soil). The site soils are not subject to seismic liquefaction because of their dense nature. Slabs -on -Grade The building floors may be constructed as slabs -on -grade atop competent, native soils, or on structural fill. The subgrade soil must be in a firm, non - yielding condition at the time of slab construction or underslab fill placement. Any soft areas encountered should be excavated and replaced with select, imported structural fill. All slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a capillary break or drainage layer consisting of a minimum 4 -inch thickness of coarse, free - draining structural fill with a gradation similar to that discussed later in Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls. In areas where the passage of moisture through the slab is undesirable, a vapor barrier, such as a 6 -mil plastic membrane, should be placed beneath the slab. Additionally, sand should be used in the fine- grading process to reduce damage to the vapor barrier, to provide uniform support under the slab, and to reduce shrinkage cracking by improving the concrete curing process. Isolation joints should be provided where the slabs intersect columns and walls. Control and expansion joints should also be used to control cracking from expansion and contraction. Saw cuts GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 5 or preformed strip joints used to control shrinkage cracking should extend through the upper one - fourth of the slab. The spacing of control or expansion joints depends on the slab shape and the amount of steel placed in it. Reducing the water -to- cement ratio of the concrete and curing the concrete, by preventing the evaporation of free water until cement hydration occurs, will also reduce shrinkage cracking. Permanent Foundation and Retaining Walls Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter ...: '::• Design Value Active Earth Pressure ' 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.50 Soil Unit Weight 135 pcf Where: (i) pcf is pounds per cubic foot, and (ii) active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. • For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height, a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures_behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well- compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 6 be accomplished with hand - operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free - draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. The native glacial till soils will not be suitable for reuse as retaining wall backfill due to their silt content and poor drainage characteristics. For increased protection, drainage composites should be placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled with pervious soil. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build -up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub - section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof the below -grade walls. If moist conditions or some seepage through the walls are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This typically includes limiting cold - joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. Excavations and Slopes No excavated slopes are anticipated other than for utility trenches. Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, if there are no indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, the soil type at the subject site would be classified as Type A. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 0.75:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that loose soil can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 JN 99047 Page 7 Drainage Considerations Foundation drains are not required except where (1) crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, (2) a slab is below the outside grade, or (3) the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth - retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1- inch - minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non- woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level of a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where (1) a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, (2) an excavation encounters significant seepage, or (3) an excavation for a building will be close to the expected high groundwater elevations. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 8. For the best long -term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. Groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Pavement Areas The pavement section may be supported on competent, native soil or on structural fill compacted to a 95 percent density. Because the site soils are silty and moisture sensitive, we recommend that the pavement subgrade must be in a stable, non - yielding condition at the time of paving. Granular structural fill or geotextile fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. To evaluate pavement subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof roll be completed with a loaded dump truck immediately before paving. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, an additional 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub - section entitled General Earthwork and Structural Fill. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly - loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt- treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily - loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily - loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 • • JN 99047 Page 8 Water from planter areas and other sources should not be allowed to infiltrate into the pavement subgrade. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. As with any pavements, some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected as the pavement ages. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. General Earthwork and Structural Fill All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other deleterious material. It is very important that existing foundation remnants be removed before site development. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill, but they could be used in non - structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support Toads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the filling and compaction process. The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Minimum Relative Compaction Beneath footings, slabs or walkways 95% Behind retaining walls 90% Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 inches of subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557 -78 (Modified Proctor). Use of .On -Site Soil If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the silty, on -site soil is wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rain and the potential need to import granular fill. The on -site soil is generally silty and therefore moisture sensitive. Grading operations will be difficult during wet weather, or when the moisture content of this soil exceeds the optimum moisture content. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 • JN 99047 Page 9 The moisture content of the silty, on -site soil must be at, or near, the optimum moisture content, as the soil cannot be consistently compacted to the required density when the moisture content is significantly greater than optimum. The moisture content of the on -site soil was generally above the estimated optimum moisture content at the time of our explorations. The on -site soil underlying the topsoil could be used as structural fill, if grading operations are conducted during hot, dry weather, when drying the wetter soil by aeration is possible. During excessively dry weather, however, it may be necessary to add water to achieve the optimum moisture content. Moisture - sensitive soil may also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment, or even foot traffic, when the moisture content is greater than the optimum moisture content. It may be beneficial to protect subgrades with a layer of imported sand or crushed rock to limit disturbance from traffic. Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three - quarter -inch sieve. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits and test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits and test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of McConkey Development, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents so the contractor may be aware of our findings. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. McConkey Development March 9, 1999 • JN 99047 Page 10 ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. The environmental assessment conducted on this property is addressed in a report which will be issued separately. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Plate 2 Plates 3 - 5 Plates 6 and 7 Plate 8 Vicinity Map Site Exploration Plan Test Boring Logs Test Pit Logs Footing Drain Detail We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. EMT /JRF: alt Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. t:k; Erin M. Toland Geotechnical Engineer James R. Finley, P.E. Principal ',EXPIRES 8 / 17/99 1 GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. I ■ HOSE mitaimmorn 16- o_ S136Ti S 137TH • 138TH . ST RIVERio N f •' ++ it �+ J CREST ST 'c S - _ PL ST T`^ 135TH JOS S FOST 13'• • 142ND 144311 L 142 DST Lr6 ■ FOSTER • H$ 144 ■•,•nn .I■ STS.. 1 7, T t [4!C1 LIB FS •arH • S 150111 Si DYKE 153TH T+) �loG,r, { J 15'. J 1 ST CRYSTAL SPRr OSI PARK Tr/ SOrrr,4CE r_ 167: CRES;VIEA PARK 7 1+ 'r•J 1 ; I 27 168TH HE S l:,? r, r ST VICINITY MAP 14840 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S TUKWILA, WA 1 Doty 1 LD"" 87: MARCH 1999 O kir 4 LEGEND: s B -1 B -2 u 4TP -3 B -3 FILL PIPE TP -1 TP -2 Q S 150th STREET EXISTING BUILDINGS S APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATIONS Q APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATIONS 1 SITE EXPLORATION PLAN 14840 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S TUKWILA, WA Job No. 99047 lOote: MARCH 1999 1 Pete 2 1 I 1 10 15 20 25 30 IMD 35 40 5 �oo� e • BORING 1 • oey.0� ��aro`�o Q�< Q \S 57 80 50 50 for 6" 100 for 2" 2 SM asphalt parking lot Tan, slightly silty SAND, medium- to coarse - grained, moist, very loose (Glacial Till) - becomes medium -dense - becomes slightly more gravelly - becomes dense - becomes.brown, very dense , Gray silty SAND with some gravel, medium- to coarse - grained, very moist, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 25 feet during drilling on February 19, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during drilling. BORING LOG 14480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington !Job: 99047 I D March 1999 ILogg� Bby: I Plate: 3 - 10 15 20 25 30 35 — 40 5 o� e BORING 2 1 ��5.�� ����`e4 4�< �o-fiQ` JSG� Description 88 75 60 for 6" 100 for 6" concrete Brown silty SAND with fine gravel, fine- to medium - grained, moist, very dense (Glacial Till) - becomes siltier - becomes moist to very moist Gray silty SAND with some gravel, medium- to coarse - grained, very moist, very dense * Test boring was terminated at 20 feet during drilling on February 26, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 7 feet during drilling. BORING LOG 14480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington IJob: Date: 'Logged by: 'Plate: 99047 March 1999 DLB 4 0 ti ti` .fir `° o�'y4� Gg �cei ����` Q� c, Jg Description • BORING 3 10 15 20 25 30 MEM 35 40 85 63 for 6" grass Gray- brown, silty SAND, fine- to medium - grained, moist, very dense (Glacial Till) - becomes siltier * Test boring was terminated at 10.5 feet during drilling on February 19, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was encountered at 8 feet during drilling. BORING LOG 14480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington I Job: (Date: 'Logged by: I Plate: ` 99047 March 1999 DLB 5 10 9�4 Gor �tco, \y5 TEST PIT 1 Description IOW 15 5 10 15 SM 9" of dark brown silty sand TOPSOIL, very moist, very loose Red - orange, silty SAND with roots, medium - grained, moist, medium -dense (Weathered Glacial Till) - becomes gray, dense to very dense (Glacial Till) — P IM * Test Pit was terminated at 8 feet on February 16, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was observed at 4 feet during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. TEST PIT 2 Description SM \7" of dark brown silty sand TOPSOIL with abundant roots Red - orange silty, gravelly, cobbley SAND, medium - grained, moist, medium -dense (Weathered Glacial Till) - becomes dense (Glacial Till) * Test Pit was terminated at 7 feet on February 16, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was observed at 3 feet during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. TEST PIT LOG 14480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington IJob No: 99047 I Date: March 1999 I Logged by: 'Plate: EMT 6 I ./et Oer G° `S°' J5 10 15 --' SM TEST PIT 3 Description 6" of dark brown silty sand TOPSOIL, very moist, very loose ' Red - orange, silty, gravelly SAND, medium - grained, moist, medium -dense (Weathered Glacial Till) - becomes gray, very dense (Glacial Till) * Test Pit was terminated at 7 feet on February 16, 1999. * Groundwater seepage was observed at 4 feet during excavation. * Slight caving of the test pit sidewalls was observed during excavation. TEST PIT LOG 14480 Pacific Highway South Tukwila, Washington 'JobNo: 99047 I March: 1999 I Log 1999 I Plate: 7 1 Slope bockfill owoy from foundation. -- ■ . TIGHTL /NE ROOF DRAIN Do not connect to fooling drain. NONWOVEN GEOTEXT /LE FILTER FABRIC VAPOR BARRIER • "\ s n „ `� ., 4 min. r,` �n FREE -DRAINING SAND /GRAVEL 4" PERFORATED HARD PVC PIPE Invert al least os /ow os fooling and /or craw/ space. Slope to drain. Place weepho/es downward. FOOTING DRAIN DETAIL 14840 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S TUKWILA, WA L dab No.: Sco /e+ Plate: 99047 I MARCH 1999 N.T.S. 8 R.55essooe LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BUILDING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION P:=0©,4�0 o a 450 KING COUNTY ADMINISTRATION 9UfLOINr, :CATTLE. MASH. 90304 TEL, 344 ■7910 Lot A Owner's Neste Address City tip Phone Enid Mason 3450 Cascadia Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98144 723_5251 Lot s Owner's Name Address City Ilp Phase A11eio S &tti Jr 4111 E. It1gh)..and Dr. Soattlei 98112 3232114 Lot C Owner's Name Address City Sip noes O /,i O Lot 1 Tag Lot I b310 Source or water j Sewage Disposal Sanitary Sewer Let SE 4 Sec &SW MA s 22 23 Legal osseraetacnr 1g Do Not 4 its. . Z certify that the ingotswtloa furnished by es le taus and se rent to the Sea of ay hnowlsdae 94111rigli of Cur i. F lot 1— .. a use mime r Lot C Slvnscurs 1- Lot A That portion of Lots 8, 27 & 28, Block 2, of Adam's Nome Tracts 1st Addition as 0 recorded in Vol. 12, page 50, Records of King County, Washington. Commencing at the Intersection an the North Line of S. 150th Street and the Er East Line of State Road 0 1 (Huy 99): thence N 18 °28'40" E, along the Easterly L. Line of said road, 126.43 Net to the True Point of Beginning, which :s on er; 3` the North Line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 & 28 as measured along 4 the Easterly Line thereof: thence S 89'44' 10" E, along said North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the East Line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North 01 411". of the Southeast Corner thereof: thence N 00.33'50" W. along the East Line >. me of Lots 27 and 8 , a distance of 220.39 feet: thence N Bg °44'10" W, 114.60 .13 feet to the East Line of State Road 0 1: thence on said East Line, .ti S 18 °28'40" W, 232.00 to the True Point of Beginning. 0 fs. tot 5 Lot 26, Block 2 of the Plat of Adam's Hose Tracts 1st Addition, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 50, Records of King County, Washington. .- p1 e9,131.13 80986 8 MEW F 6.00 REV 5 26.00 CASHSL ** *32.00 Lot C F -271 o.y /oe - ei.i• o f,. 4•9 /0 uJo Lot LLnc Adjustment NOATN SCATS: e= 9 p. M • /2640 C 1;' Oli N.4) . '. . ..i141: %, •t 1; 1 ••ql • 0 al 3 ° • LOT ES r 190.31 i'f /•v e2/0 .$150"'ST. :281.0 �. Do Not write Below This Line Approval is hereby granted subject to: 0 Disapproved because: o•, L.• NESIERIIIImmogi 9/43 tanner / Da NoTE: Approval of this adjustment does not assure the property owner that the subject property itself has satisfied the State and County sub- division requirements (RCN 58.17 and King County Title 19). Please be advised that building permits will not be issued to lots which have not complied with the requirements of said statute and code. • 1 . 1l 1t.'Id 1'r • 9 •j7 • . c1 t ..�: • - it i :l • 1 :., • ;LA to 1..._ :11 :ton p in • u + •► ac• . .' t. 25",11.:71 i� + 1�:. •.i!'.:::3 ►:x raata. " %hp ;72 4 / :,:m �.OZ 4 .;may 2 .. -. 1 u' :e'1 ;: :- , -r,. nt to tir, .i :: r t, ri / c :..: : urrlt ►to piece r,;d Co- .)'ii ty 062tt1 t•_ rl 1 u; on r.•: -:'u1: lu be exte :.rion : ei op c!i 3. :r1 31 ;a !.0 extant' u,o% t " :. (,thiuobi ns- rain: Astrip :• lu 1J ft A i. pit r.::6 to .:ond Noel (1 r,oir:o :..:lmr:y) t 50 ft • •n the :ilc:e or tAt con- Ali rei rosfu : ►,c:. n:l ors t. _ t:Y►v d `".4 -'rop oco .0 re 1.1ca tiOrt on it i .t .id of i:t the o'!:10.0 tit' the •: 1.00 c.`r • t " :. •'► :: Lt +' 1: t.l , L nh . :14Lt, piety (: it. r r :1' t of 1 ©n:o and eAr-ta8 t.-) and from ev.: prop htu ne.• if i; t u fur t:;1.• prup o . mn intt s f.nin., c; 9lor; ear: 1:3 Ly -:•t►.:; o::. :.t.r ie: -Amor L.V 'sour 1' ....fl[:t n p ; ..'X U:1 re's at wore v.t• :: ,.; 1) 1JZI C'.: t 1.: ;.,.er: y :ept) :'t r ::.it !.•; . :xt -lover.; . :r 0-30 2-0? : "c■.+ 1i 1•.,.:V .1 .:•3i.e:fita . Gr :;; cl:lotltan • : .lto •..0,11.11an, ".i' to .. t: t© r► t;. i'!r tpn i :p .. e t ::. :- - -till .. 471-- -- In t :! tl.: 2 :11-at .:. to ;dorm •• •tsc • ores np ►�t. 1; if :59167:: Lt. 1J .lu,li p11 ► ::: rc,a ti ;uou-. t') .tc to :if•d ryry 1 (1 rtc1::c .:1 •:..v.y) • nC te1.. •..:ilat !0 :t :r•V Lrc center •,•'J• : .•.. LJ•.V .)n v.: :• ' " �'•• :Jr:�: .'ru :n n': . ..Q 4...' +v0 ..3 .•ll0 .�� to tr .Jura i1 :lt1 4:S2•JU c11 ,: .,eyed l•`'w. ' 1.1 torG.'r3 : +•- .r.ir no?. W r 1r. t,:• o :1oe •)" t. =: :.Lroot:r of ; .+1i. .. :. `1f : t: • r j ;t.- - -�::; 1 +, _ a•:.1 oi..•:: - -- i;urr:. 4 .a.'1••11r:n . .d to t.:OClelln o 0 + Pc '. .' iih:l .i.l. • l t►• . o'.' L ®L 1: :n U•.'I' 'rZ;; 2 aX (MOM 1:...c••• is p 1'01• 1+ , re?) U ►.;,:v - 1... ( :.a s.. I. ',1: At 'r► -xt ..1..) is rt. a -'.0 'J-07 ;`u ',Jo .1 :r► 1+13:10 fit!) X1:1 c.YO . . iul►!u .1, tot .1- 1 ! ins L 1.', 1G, 1.7 ;?r1 • ea, n 1:2 :' c p, 1n .1 1..;;7: .; Lute IIo U 1. ,o3 • :• . :'0- - -.. 71 - -e ur i:i L'. 1. 8009260460 EXCISE TAX -PAID I06U86. 31 491Ke atr . -- ::C:R • • „� "� •;NG G �HN' PEAL ESTATE CONTRACT ri61 is Rrxrd d Remit d FIPST A.':iER!CAiN TITLE WA 98121 THIS CONTRACT, made and entl:red into this 25th day of September, 1980, hetween ALLAN SMITH, JR. and ELIZABETH SMITH , husband and wife, hereinafter called the "Seller," and ENID L. MASON, a single woman, hereinafter called the "Purchaser," WITNESSETH: That the Seller agrees . to sell to the Purchaser and the Purchaser agrees to purchate from the Seller the following described real estate, with the appurtenances, In King County, State of Washington: That portion of lots 8, 27, and 28, Block 2 First Addition to Adam's Home tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 50, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 150th Street, and the Easterly line of Stat= Road No. 1; thence ::urth 18'28'40" East along the Ea :ter!y `!nw nI .,; A ...wA I'g 41 *Pot to the. true nnint of beginning which is on the - North line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly line thereof; thence South 89 °44'IO" East along said North line 190.3I feet to a point on the East Tine of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North 0 °33'50" West along the East line of Lots 27 and 8, a distance of 220.39 feet; thence North 89 °44'10" West 114.60 feet to the East line of State Road No. 1; thence on said East line South 18 °28'40" h•'st 232.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King,. State of Weshir.'ton. The tents and conditions of this contract are as follows: 1 The purchase price is Two Hundred Thirty Thousand (5230.000.00) Dollars. of which Thirty -Five Thousand (535,000.00) Dollars have been paid. the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, .and t!te balance of said purchase price shall be paid as follows: One Thousand Five Hunerce T.venty -Ei nt and Eigh.y One-Hundredths ($1,522.80) Do! lars, or more at Purchaser's option, on or before the first day of October, 1980, and One Thousand Five Hundred Twenty -Eight and E?.ty One-Hundredths (S1,528.80) Dollars, or more at Purchaser's c; tion, on or before the first day of each ^ucceeding r.rtlendar month until the balance of said purchase -1- • • ,•• .. ,., •••• .. price shall have been fully paid. The Purchaser further agrees to pay interest on the diminishing balance of said purchase price at the rate of nine per cent (9%) p:r annum from the 25th day of September, 1980, which interest shall be deducted from each installment payment and the balance of each payment applied in reduction of principal. All payments to be made hereunder shall be made at 4105 East Highland Drive, Seattle, Washington, or at such other place as the Seller may direct in writing. As referred to in this contract, "date of closing" shall be September 25, 1980. CD (1) The Purchaser assumes and agrees to pay before delinquency all taxes and assessments that may as between grantor Tand grantee hereafter become a lien on said real estate; and if by the terms of this contract the purchaser has assumed payment CD :a of any mortgage, contract or other encumbrance, or has assumed payment of or agreed to purchase subject to, any taxes or as'- 'sments now a lien on said real estate. the Purchaser agrees to pay the same before delinquency. (2) The Purchaser agrees, until the purchase price is fully paid, tc keep the buildings now and hereafter placed on said real estate insured to the maximum insurable value thereof against loss or damage by both fire and windstorm in a company acceptable to th• s.11nr and for the Seller's benefit. as his interest mov appear, and to pay all premiums therefor and to deliver all policies and renewals thereof to the Seller. Seller will accept as the maximum insurable value that amount obtained by the brokerage firm of Sprague and Israel, and if th3 maximum insurable value of each rentable apartment unit, as an average, is less than 53,000, the present structures on the Prope.ty shall be considered for purposes of Paragraph 13 hereof, cs uninsurable. (3) The Purchaser agrees that full inspection of said real estate has been made and that neit:ier the Seller nor his assigns shall he held to any covenant respecting the condition of any improvements thereon nor shall the Purchaser or Seller or the assigns of either be held to A'y covonnnt or agreement for jlteretions, improvements or repairs unless the covenant or agreement relied on is contained herein or is in writing and - nttcched to end made a part of this contract. (4) The Purchaser Pssumcs all hazards of damage to or r4estruction of any im;,rovements now on said real estate or hereafter paced thereon. and of the taking of sold real estate or any part thereof for nuhlic use; and agrees that no such 8009260460 damage, destruction or taking shall constitute a failure of consideration. In case any Fart of said real estate is taker. for public use, the portion of the condemnation award remaining after payment of reasonable expenses of procuring the saute shall be paid to the Seller and applied as payment on the purchase price herein unless the Seller elect- !c allow the Purchaser to apply all or a portion of such condemnation award to the rebuilding or restoration of any improvements damaged by such taking. In case of damage or destruction from a peril Insured against, the proceeds of such insurance remaining after payment of the reasonable expense of procuring the same snail be devoted to the restoration or rebuilding of such improvements within a reasonable time, unless Purchaser elects that said proceeds shall be paid to the Seller for application on the purchase price herein. (5) The Seller has delivered, or agrees to deliver within 15 days of the date of closing, a purchaser's policy of title insurance in standard form, or a commitment therefor, issued by First American Title Insurance Company.insu•ing the Purchaser to the full amount of said purchase price against loss or damage by reason of defect in Seller's title to said real estate as of the date of closing and containin! nn nrnontinne n•h ^• !h_n :!:_ tollowing: a. Printed general exceptions aopeariot in said policy form and Exceptions 11 and 13 set forth and designated in Preliminary Commitment Number 58788 of First American Tit:a Insurance Company dated September 8, 1980; b. Liens or encumbrances which by the terms of this contract the Purchaser is to assume, or as to which the conveyance hereunder is to he made subject; and c. Any existing contract or contracts under which Seller is purchasing snid real estate, and any mortgage or other obligation, which. Seller by this contract agrees to pay. none of which for the purpose of this Paragraph (5)shall be dee.ned defects in Seller': title. (6) If Seller's title to said real estate is subject to an existing contract or contracts under which Seller is purchasing Said real estate, or any rrorteazo or other obligation which Seller is to pay, Seller agrees to make such payments in -3- accordance with the terms thereof, and upon default, the Purchaser shall have the right to make any payments nceessery to remove the default, and any payments so made shall be applied tc the payments next falling due the Seller under this contract. CD (7) The Seller agrees, upon receiving full payment of th' Q purchase price and interest in the manner above specified, to Oexecute and deliver to Purchaser a statutory warranty deed to cV said real estate, excepting any part thereof hereafter taken for 0% public use, free of encumbrances except any that may attach after CDdate of closing through any person other than the Seller, and subject to those exceptions referred to in Paragraph (5) herein. (8) Unless a different date is provided for herein, the Purchaser shall be entitled to possession of said real estate on date of closing and to retain possession so long as Purchaser is not in default hereunder. The Purchaser covenants to keep the buildings and other improvements on said real estate in good repair and not to permit waste and not to use, or permit the use of, the real estate for any illegal purpose. The Purchaser covenants to pay all service, installation or construction charges for water, sewer, electricity, garbage or other utility services furnished to said real estate after the date Purchaser is entitled to possession. (9) In case the-Purchaser fails to make any payment herein provided or to maintain insurance, as herein required, the Seller may make such payment or effect such insurance, and any amounts so paid by the Seller, together with interest at the rate of JO% per annum thereon from date of payment until repaid, shall be repayable by Purchaser on Seller's demand, all without prejudice to any other right the Seller might have by reason of such default. (10) Time is of the essence of this contract, and it is agreed that in case the purchaser shall fail to comply with or perform any condition or agreement hereof or to make Any payment required hereunder promptly at the time anc in the manner herein required, the Seller may elect to declare all of the Purchaser's rights hereunder terminated, and upon his doing so, All payments - made by the Purchaser hereunder and all improvements placed upon the real estate shall be forfeited to the Seller as l iquidatne damages, and the Seiler shall have right to re -enter and ta;:^ possession of the real estate; and no waiver by the Seller of any default on the part of the Purchaser shall be construed as a waiver of any subsenuent default. (11) Upon Seiler's t:ection to bring suit to enforce unv -4- 8009260460 covenant of this contract, including suit to collect any payment required hereunder, the Purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costs and expenses in connection with such suit, which sums shall he included in any judgment or decree entered in such suit. If the Seller shall bring suit to procure an adjudication of the termination of the Purchaser's rights hereunder, and judgment is so entered, the Purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and all costs and expenses in connection with such suit, and also the reasonable cost of searching records to determine the condition of title at the date such suit is commenced, which sums shall be included in any judgment or decree entered in such suit. (12) Purchaser shall maintain public liability and property damage liability insurance concerning the Property in the aggregate sum of $1,000,000 in full force and effect until such time as the present buildings and improvements are razed or otherwise destroyed. (13) The buildings and other improvements. presently on the property may be razed by Purchaser at any time, in Purchaser's sole discretion and at Purchaser's sole expense, and must be razed by Purchaser under the following circumstances: (a) If they are cundemned by any public authority having the jurisdiction and right to do so, upon an order so directing; (b) If they become uninsurable regarding fire insurance, or if, for any reason, Purchaser is unable to maintain public liability ant property damace liability insurance rnveraoo in tho minim„in aggregate sum of $1,000,000. 14. At such time, if ever, as Purchaser razes the buildings and improvements currently on the property, Purchaser shall riduce the principal balance of the Real Estate Contract to zero simultaneously with or immediately prior to the razing of the buildings and improvements currently on the property. -5- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Instrument as of the date first written above. SELLERS: PURCHASER: A f-. I 1 /'� ,' At. . . t ► l 1 Allan E. Smi h, Jr. i O ► .. CD N Elizabeth J. P. Smith O CD m STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF K I N G ) On this day personally appeared before me ALLAN E. SMITH, JR., ELIZABETH 3. P. SMITH and EMIu L. MASON, to me known to be the individuals deserih.A in _ne. ...!:C �;,ccutG, t ie wiiiliu end ioregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and •voluntary aet and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Enid L. Mason GIVEN under my hand and September, 1980. Sm1RO1aR.d01.19 25th day of tar} ublic in and for thS_SLaye • of Washington, residing at • 8310210550 RE- RECORD OF AL-DITOR "S FILE No. 8310170840 to. show addition of Exhibits 1 and 2. Excise tax paid under E #608644 ANIMINTNT TO REAL ESTATE CiTf1'RAGT This is an amendment to that certain Real Estate Contract dated September 25, 1980 between Allan E. Smith, Jr. and Elizabeth J. P. Smith, husband and wife, as Seller, and Eaid L. Mason, a single woman, as Purenaser, recorded under King County Recorder Number 8009:60460 (the "Real Estate Contract ") and concerning the following described real property (the "Property "): That portion of Lots 8, 27, and 28, Block 2 First Addition to Adam's Home tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 50, records of King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 150th Street, and the Easterly line of State Road No. 1; thence North 18 °28'40" Fast along the Easterly line of said road 126.43 feet to the true point of beginning which is on the North line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly line thereof; thence South 89°44'10" Fast along said North line 190.31 feet to a point on the F.ast line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North 0 °33'50" West along the F.ast line of Lots 27 and 8, a distance of 220.39 feet; thence North 89 °44'10" ►tiest 114.60 feet to the F.ast line of State Road No. 1; thence on said F.ast line South l8 °28'40" West 232.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. WCIT.11S A. When the Real Estate Contract was entered into, the parties were unaware that certain portions of the structures located on the Property encroached upon certain contiguous real property owned by Seller (the "Encroachment"). B. Having recently discovered the Encroachment, the parties desire to make an equitable adjustment to cure the Encroachment. C. In order to insure full enjoyment of the Property as an apartment complex, Purchaser desires an easement of ingress and egress in order to use certain garages. fl. although Seller believes that at most Purchaser might be entitled to an easement with respect to the Fncroartunent, Seller is willing to make a lot line adjustment am] grunt nn easement of ingress and egress in return for Purchaser's agrceement to nold harmless and indemnify Seller with resp -•t to anv future problem'. E. because of prior lute payments from Seller :o Seller's vendor, a' least part of which has been caused by Pur "fuser, Seller is being required by After recording r.tu.n co: Steven A. Gaines 1 910 Eank of California Center Seattle, W. 98164 . 8310210550 Seller's vendor to open a collection account. Seller desires Purchaser, and Purchaser is willing, to bear the cost of any collection fees and charges assessed by the collection agent because of future late payments by Purchaser. TERNS, 04301lXiN1S AND CCID)ITIc S 1. The Real Estate Contract is hereby amended to add the real property described in the survey attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth (the "Additional Property ") to the Property. 2. The Real Estate Contract is hereby amended to add an easement for ingress and egress over the contiguous property of Seller described in Exhibit 2 (the "Easement "), identical in form to Exhibit 2. 3. Purchaser warrants that the addition of the Additional Prcperty and the Easement is sufficient to allow the full use and enjoyment of the Property, and waives and relinquishes any and all rights and causes of action arising or in any way related to the Encroachment or the Easement. Purchaser further warrants that any agreement or other document of conveyance hereafter entered into by Purchaser to convey the Property and Additional Property shall contain: (1) a recital of the facts surrounding the Encroachment and the Easement; (2) a waiver on behalf of -the purchaser from Purchaser of any and all rights and causes o'. action arising or in any way related to the Encroachment or the Easement; and (3) a covenant that the purchaser from Purchaser shall include clauses (1) and (2) in any agreements or other documents of conveyance and require successive purchaser's to do the same. 4. Purchaser agrees to pay to Seller any collection fees and /or charges assessed by any collection agent against Seller because of late payments of rent by Purchaser. 5. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, personal representatives and assigns of the parties hereto. 6. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Real Estate Contract is not changed or modified in any way whatsoever. fl\TFT)this _ day of / 1183. i - . ` Allan E. Smith, Jr. P. Smith Enid L. ;►lason STATE M HILSHINGTQI ) ) SS. QXMY Cr KING ▪ ) On this /71.-1. day of October, 1983, personally appeared ALLAN F SMITH, C JR. and ELIZABETH J. P. SMITH, his wife, to me known to be the individuals Ubdescribed in and who executed the foregoing Amendment to Real Estate Contract Cand acknowledged said Amendment to be their free and voluntary act and deed 1l for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. CD IN WITNESS %HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official CO ▪ seal the day and year first above written. .. • Notary Public in and for the State of l% shington, residing at Seattle. ST_NTE OF AnSHINCITIY SS. CUN Y OF KING ) - On this hu day of October, 1983, personally appeared FNID L. MISODI, to me known to be the individual described in and who exeei'ed the foregoing Amendment to Rcal Estate Contract and acknowledged said _Amendment to be her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS %1FRECF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. SAG•t0:SnIRO1a.RM; 3 Notary Public in and for the State of %vashington, residing at Seattle. 8310210550 FG1IB1T 1 PAii L C That portion of Lots 3, 27 and 28, Block 2, of Adam's Home Tracts 1st Addition as recorded in Volume 12, page 50, Rewords of King County, Washington. Commencing at the Intersection on the North Line of South 150th Street and the F.ast Line of State Road No. 1 (Highway 99); thence North 18 °28'40" East, along the Easterly Line of said road, 126.43 feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is on the North Line of the South 120 feet ..f said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the F.asterly Line thereof; thence South 89 °44'10" East, along said North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the East Line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast Corner thereof; thence North 00 °33'50" West, along the F.ast Line of Lots 27, a distance of 55.89 feet to the True Point of Beginning, thence North 00 °33'50" West along the East line of Lot 27, a distance of 137.48 feet to the North line of Lot 27, thence East 23.30 along the north line of Lot 26 which line is a prolongation of the North line of Lot 27, thence Southwest 139.06 f.et to the True Point of Beginning. 8310210550 EXHIBIT 2 Filed for record at request of: Steven A. Gaines 910 Bank of California Center Seattle, Washington 98164 -1073 iQlixtClY F1SFIV>FM ALLAN E. SMITH, JR. and F.LIZIBF.TH J. P. SMITH, husband ana wi fe, for an in consideration Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, hereby grant a nonexclusive easement, which shall run with the land, to Grantee, F21ID L. M.SCN, a single woman: An easement for ingress and egress over that portion of Lots 8, 27 and 28, Block 2, of Adam's Home Tracts 1st Addition as recorded in Volume 12, page 50, Records of King County, Washington. Commencing at the Intersection on the North Line of South 1SOth Street and the East Line of State Road No. 1 (Highway 99); thence North 18 °28'40" F.ast, along the Easterly Line of said road, 126.43 feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is on the North Line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the F.asterly Line thereof; thence South 89°44'10" F.ast, along said North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the Fast Line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast Corner thereof; thence North 00 °33'50" West, along the F.ast Line of Lots 27, a distance of 193.37 feet to the North Line of Lot 27, thence East 23.30 feet along the North 1 ine of Lot 26 which line is a prolongation of the North line of Lot 27, to the True Point of Beginning, thence Southwest along the Fast line of Parcel C 70 feet, thence West 20 feet parallel to the North 1 ine of Lot 26. Thence Northereasterly 70' parallel to the Fast line of parcel C to the North line of Lot 26, thence hest 20 feet along the North 1 ine of Lot 26 to the True Point of Beginning. The description of Parcel C is as follows: That portion of Lots 8, 27 and 28, Block 2, of : 1dam's Home Tracts lst Addition as recorded in Volume 12, page S0, Records of King County, Washington. Commencing at the intersection on the North Line or South 150th Street and the East Line of State Road No. i (Highway 99); thence North 18 °28'4U" Fast, along the Easterly Line of saki road, 126.43 feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is on the North L'ne of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly Line thereof; thence South 89 °44'10" Fast. along said North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the Fast line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North o! tt.e Southeast Corner thereof; thence North UO °33'50" hest, along the East Line of Lots 1 8310210550 ExrsiBJT 2 A, 27, a distance of 55.89 feet to the True Point of Beginning, thence North 00 °33'50" West along the East line of Lot 27, a distance of 137.48 feet to the North line of Lot 27, thence Fast 23.30 along the north line of Lot 26 which line is a prolongation of the North line of Lot 27, thence Southwest 139.06 feet to the True Point of Beginning. The dominant estate is: That portion of Lots 8, 27, and 28, Block 2 First Addition to Adam'r Hone tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 50, records of King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 150th Street, and the Easterly line of State Road No. 1; thence North 18 °28'40" East along the Easterly line of said road 126.43 feet to the true point of beginning which is on the North line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly line thereof; thence South 89 °44'10" East along said North line 190.31 feet to a point on the Fast line of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North 0 °33'50" West along the East line of Lots 27 and 8, a distance of 220.39 feet; thence North 89 °44'10" West 114.60 feet to the East line of State Road No. 1; thence on said Fast line South 18 °28'40" West 232.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. 1. Purpose Grantee shall have the right tc use the easement solely for ingress and egress to garages presently existing on Parcel C. The easement shall not be used for any other purpose. 2. Cost:. of Upkeep and Repair. Grantee ;hall be wholly responsible for maintaining the easement in suitable condition for use as nn epcement for ingress and egress, and, if the easement should revert as herein provided, shall return tne area within the easement to Grantors in at least as good a condition as its present state, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 3. Restrictions. Grantee shall keep the casement area free of parked vehicles and other staticnary objects. Grantee shall not change the presen! elevation or grade of the eastrrxnt arcu. 4. Reversion. Tne easement shall auturnatirally revert to grantors at such time, if ever, tv: the buildings on tl.c dominant estate are no longer used as reside:.tial apartments and/or are raft :ii and /or tne garages on Parcel C are used for anything other !non to scrvrr.e the renter!: of the apartments on the dominant estate. 2 EXHIBIT 2 S. Grantors' Use of Easement. Grantors reserve the right to use the easement for any prtrpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. 8. Indemnity. By accepting and recording this easement, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantors from any and all claims fc- injuries and /or damages suffered by any person which may be caused by exercise by Grantee or those using the easement with Grantee's permission of the rights herein granted; provided, that Grantee shall not be responsible to Grantors for any injuries and /or damages to any person cased by acts or omissions of Grantors. O N 111 7. Successors and Assigns. The rights and obligations of the parties Cshall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective heirs, N personal representatives, successors and assigns. CD flU'H :his day of October, 1983. OD STATE. CF 11ILSHI:1l31Q3 ) SS. m1YIY OF KING :Ulan E. Smith, Jr. - Elizabeth J. P. Smith Enid L. Mason On this day of October, 1983, personally appeared ALLAN E. SUITIi, JR. and ELIZABETH J. P. SMITH. husband and wife, to me known to be the Individuals described in and who excruted the foregoing Roadway Fasemnnt ana acknowledged said Roadway Easement to be their free and voluntary act and decd for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WI.INFSS WHEBFDF, I have hereunto %ct ray hand and affixed my official sent the day and year first above written. Notury Public in and for the S +etc of Washington, residing at Scuttle. 8310210550 St1TE a WISHINGICN QXNW OF KING tutiBIT 2 t, ) SS. On this day of October, 1983, pers:.na I l y appeared FIVID L. MISON, to me known to be the indivilual described in and who ex:,cuted the foregoing Roadway Easement and acknowledged said Roadway Easement to be her free and voluntary act and deed for the use and purposes therein menti...-ed. IN WITNESS Vd1F1UXF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. S G41:Roadway.Fas 4 Notary Publi.• in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle. II 38 411 '83 «• �!r OF 1• '•'+ • . ,sir • 8310210550 E.As t!/r, 1 % kXHIB1T 2 NORTH SCALE: 1.: W fo 1 8311070007 CDThat portion of Lots 8, 27, and 28. Blocs: : First Addition to :16�,m's CD Ps llorne tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of O Plats, page SU, records ul King County, 1htshin ton described as follows: c6 3 Ci ;.) 2nd AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE CONTRACT and AMENDMENT TO EASE :,'EPTT This is a 2nd amendment to that certain real estate contract dated September 25, 1980 between Allan Smith Jr. and Elizabeth Smith, husband and wife as seller, and Enid L. Mason, a single ..oman, as purchaser, recorded under King County Recorder -) No. 8009260460 (the real estate contract), which contract was amended u.lder auditors file No. 8310170840 which first amendment �' was re- recorded under auditor's file No. 8310210550, covering the following described real property in King •• ^ounty, Washin;ton: C: m o. Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South ISCth 14../ 4. p` Street, and the Easterly line of State ltond No. l; thence North : .. Q m :�`�� 18 °23'40" east nlong the Easterly line of said road 126.43 feet tc a the true point of beginning which is on the North line of the South le r+, ri J=w 120 feet of slid Lots 27 and 28 as :treasured along the Easterly line ti�i thereof; thence South S9 °44' l'J" East along said North line 190.31 feet to a point un the Eus' line of Lot 27 and wl :ich is 120 feet - North of the Southeast 'wrncr thereof; thence North 0 °33'50" West along the East line of Lots 27 and 8, n distance or 220.30 feet; thence North 89 °44'IU" rv'esl 114.60 feet to the Eest line of State Road No. 1; thence on said Host line S:'atu 13 °28'4U" West 232.00 feet to the true point of bed rnniti;,. Si,tu:rtc in the County of King, N4 State of Mtshingtor;. AND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE No. 8310170339. Whereas, the first amendment to the real estate contract contained an Exhibit 1 Parcel C and an Exhibit 2 Roadway easement, and Whereas, said exhibits 1 and 2 contained certain leg.tl descriptions which were in error, and Whereas, the parties hereto are Jesirious of correcting said error;. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that Exhibits 1 and 2 as recorded under Auditor's tile No. 8310210550 shall be deleted and replaced with the exhibits i. and 2 attached hereto ant' by this reference made a part hereof. These portions of the attached exhbits 1 and 2 which ar_ underlined, represent the portions of said exhibits that have been corrected herein. , and sa}d eas mint shall be amended to be in accordance with Exhibit 2. • Datyd this 3rd day of Nov muer, 1983. Allan E. Smith Jr. G Elizabeth J Smith Enid L. Mason :7—>427(' 8 ti STATE OF WASHINGTON. ss. County of KING On this day personally appeared before me ALLAN E. SMITH, JP.. to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and acknowledged thct he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. O GIVEN under :sty h.end and official seal this CO 1e•.a %ITh I y IUWVIOV *I STATE OF WASHINGTON. County of KING On this day personally appeared before me ss. 3 day ofl ovember / , 191;3 Norary Public in and for tl r State of residing at - ��...1 ' 1 • ' -9236 ELIZABETH .:.P. S:•1ITH • •' • • • :d f to me known to be the individual described- in and who executed the within all; foregoing instrument. and at.. nowleJged that she signed :he same as her frse and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hind and official seal this •C••(• (J•r .•O•••Ol/•\ 1 1 -- IIL 1C.•u 3 day o f f November „ ! . 19 g3 . \'or•iry Iluufic :11 and fur tje .Sate o! 1Caiiin".1',t.., •1•CId111,,/ .it - //'_,G• L 1 Fl — r;rc l_ . c . 1 ii ". C✓+ t I ! . 1 �- I ( ) F. 9236 FAIIBIT 1 P.\iit37. C That ?ort ion of Lot 2, - — • — — — Block 2, of Adam's H.,me Tracts 1st Addition as recorded in Volume 12, page 50, Records of -King ti County, Washington. Ccnunencing at the Intersection on the North 00 Line of South 150th Street and the Fast Line of State Road.No 1 O (Highway 99); thence North 18 °28'40" Fast, along the Easterly Line r of said road, 126.43 feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is O on the North Line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly Line thereof; thence South 89 °44'10" el East, along said North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the Fast tine CO of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast Corr :cr thereof; thence N3rtn 00 °33'50" West, along the East Line of Lots 27, a distance of 5:..89 feet to the True Point of Beginning, thence North 00 °33'50" West along the East line of Lot 27, a distance of 137.48 feFt to the North line of Lot 27, thence Fast 23.30 along the north line of Lot 26 which line is a prolongation of the North line of Lot 27, thence Scuthwest 139.06 feet to the Truc Point of Beginning. • • 4. Zo • L7 l`1 . •• • 1 6E' OZ� • ?2 z o 0 rn 6 • • • O 8 CI OD W0111311 Filed for record at request of: Steven A. Caines 910 Bark of California Center Seattle, Washington 98164 -1078 I1<21f2V \Y FASFfTT ALL•111 E. SMITH, JR. and ELIZ`.P.ETH J. P. SMITH, husband and wife, for an in consideration Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable cons•:t°_rati..... hereby grant a nonexclusive easement, which shall run with the land, to Grantee, F1II) L. At1S14, a single woman: An easement for ingress and egress over that portion of Lot 26. -- — —Block 2, of Adam's HomcTracts 1st Addition as recorded in Volume 12, page 50, Records of King County, Washington. Conmencing the Intersection on the North Line of South 150th Street and the East Line of State Road No. 1 (Highway 99); thence North 17°28'40" East, along the Easterly Line of said roud, 126.43 feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is on the North Line of the South 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly Line thereof; thence South 89°44'10" Fast, along snld North Line, 190.31 feet to a point on the East Lir.2 of Lot 27 and which is 120 feet North of the Southeast Corner thereof; thence North 00 °33'50" 1 :'est, along thn Fast Line of Lots 27, a distance of 193.37 feet to the North Line of Lot 27, thence Fast 23.30 feet along the North line of Lot 26 which line is a prolongation of the North lice of Lot 27, to the Title Point of Beginning, thence Southwest along the East line of Parcel C 70 feet, :hence ..,:;t20 feet parallel to the North line of Lot 26, Thence Northerensterly 70' puraliel to the Fast line of parcel C to the North line of Lot 2G, thcncc West 20 f.r..t alov; the North tine of Lot 26 to the True Point of beginning. Tne description of Parcel C is as follows: That portion of Lot — — — — Illo^k 2, of Adam's Ilorne Tracts gat ddiiron as recorded in Volume 12, pugc 50, Records of Kin;; County, Washington. Con :ccrrr.ing at the Intersection on the North Line of South 150th Street rnd the Fast Line of State :.end No. 1 (Highway 991; thenrr. North. 18°28'40" Fast, along the Easterly Line of said rood,' 12G.4's feet to the True Point of Beginning, which is on the Nortn Linc of the South 120 feet of said Lots:27 and 28 as measured along the Easterly Line thereof; thence South 89644'10" Fast, along said North Lint!. 193.31 feet to u point on the East Line of Le: 27 and which is 120 feet Nortn of the Southeast Corner thereof; thence North 00°33'50" west, along; the East Line of Lots 1 EXHIBIT 2 it, • 27, a distance of 55.89 feet to the True Point of Beginning, thence North 00 °33'50" West ,ticng the East line of Lot 27, a distance of 137.48. feet to the North line of Lot 27, thence Fast 23.20 along t1'e north line of Lot 2G wtlieh line is u prolongation of the North line of Lot 27, thence Southwest 13111.06 feet to the True Point of C beginning. CD The dominant estate O That portion or Lots 8, 27, and 28, Blor•k 2 First Addition to Adam's t") Home tracts, uccordiag to the ;>Iut thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 50, records of hang County, Washington dr: scribed as follows: Beginning ut the intersection of the North line of South 150th Street, and the Easterly line of State Roud No. 1; thence North 18 °28'40" East niung the Easterly l Ine of said road 12G.43 feet to the true point of Ucbinrl :u;: whir•.►; is un the North line of the South 120 feet of suid Lots .7 ant. 2$ ::s :t t'.ure.J along the Easterly line Thereof; th•3:tr•.c South Stet'4.1'1U" East ulu.t; said North line 190.31 feet to a point on the bast I I.Ie of Lot 27 and '.hierh is 120 feet North of the Southeast corner t:a:rcuf; thence North 0u33'SU'' best along the East line of Lots '.7 ::r,d M, n r :tstunet. ;f 220.39 feet; thence north 89°44110" West tl4.6'. fee:: the East t:: •• or stale. Road No. 1; 1he:.e e ::alu 1•.:t 1 line N.mth °2 feet to the true: 3utnt f 18 ll'4ei West •232.017 1 u he:j.nnlel: Setalle.' in the County'uf King, State of Wusttingtnt.. 1. Purpose C;run :ec Shull :. :1V': the ell :L: to u :.e the cese'.;erlt solely for ingress and egress to t:ur.', ;e•: presently Iy extlt lee: e.tl I'IIr. el C. The easement shnit not be u•:cd for any other ;,ur,s,':... 2. Costs of Upkeep and Repair. l:rnI.tve •.Iree1 be ....holly rc:pun'.ible for maintaining the easement In ;u1 ta:Ile e•.n.dl t ion fur .:.•,: as .,e, ensenee.It for ingress and egress, mid, the casement '.lealli 1 1'1•V L. "t a': lIere:tll; a ruv.t:ed, shall return the uren w i t;:i n the ea' ;e: relit to (grantor: I11 at 11.1151 a% good a condition as its present state, rcaa.nrtule wt•4r rind :are' USCUp!e. :. 3. Restrictions. Crcn:ee Sh. :11 kee,, tu' ;•.1•,eitieIl :,e'en free of parked vehicles and other stationary objects. U. ante.: shall r.G1 e':ln•I :e the present elevation or grade of t : :c coca :rot area. 4. Reversion. TL• e: :cement •:T111I 11utun,:etieu11• revr'r1 to g unt. r': at such little, if ever, the 11: on !lee: (:• :.nl'eaal e'.lute :.r'e: r{.1 IG:1;'er u'.et: as re-identia1 apartments u:eel /ur ever cried Ilmliur the j1:1••.I:e5 Get I'arr•t•1 r; ure UCCd for anything ollvzr thLn l.. •c.vl.•.: the renter': of the n ;.art1Utht'. on the dominant estate. 8 0 MATE OF WISH I tr.i1X11 I SS• Q 2 Y or inc Are,' Ot Ut.s 3 c:a y f er-� �, I133, personull Y appeared 6:ln I.. $SGt to me known to b.. the individual described in unJ who executed the foregoing Roadway Easement and acknowledged said Roadway Easement to be her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses nrtU purpose:: therein ::e:itic:tad. 114 1G1Th) $ ttIfl1UDF, 1 huvc Ilcrcuntc . Isy hund unt (fixed rr/ cif icial ses l the day u•ld year first ubovc wr i t ten. STA I :ftoadway.l_!s I�.JIar' I'uuI lc in anj for the Slate of tins :Iington, residing at 8311070007 E HICIT 2 5. Grantors' Use of Easement. Grantors reserve the right to use the easer•.ent for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted. 6. Indemnity. By accepting and recording this easement, Grantee agrees to indemnify and hold hairless Grantors fro.n any and all claims for injurer. and /or damages suffered by any person which may be caused by excrci:e by Grantee or those using the easement with Grantee's permission of• the rig.". :s herein granted; provided, that Gr'tntec shall not be responsible to Grantors for any injuries and /or dwnagcs to any :tcrson reused by acts or omissions of Grantors. 7. Successors and assigns. The rights and lbligaticns of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. 11TFI) this -day of (x• tuber, 193, .\I len E. &id th J Mid L. Meson STATE OF i\\Si11•LiIIN SS. CCeNTY CF KIN.; On this 3 day c(O t-leve-r, 15JJ, personally 14,Rcircd:1LLAN E. S:.1:111. JIt. and EL17.AUKl1: J. Y. SMrril, 1.u'Iuti I and .: i re, to ntt: known to be the individuals described in and w1.0 c::ct:uteJ the furagoing ltuudway lusemcnt and at:knowlet:gcd said lttudwny Fasta.rn: to be their free anti voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein ::.:.: jolted. IN 1Yl'I:.I'::S 1't1l!1PJi)F, 1' have ln:r••utilu .;et heed and off : ed n:y official scu i t he day :l. :c: v:2:1r f i rs t nUovt: wr t t:t. Notary i't:LI it: to and for 11.= State of W'ushi ::;;ton; residtr :.,: at . • • .• EpAs.:Fr...11 F...1 Jr 416 t mitt:11s 413#16 r NOR T H SCALE: ill= 8411070065 STEWART TITLE COMPANY of Washingtun, Inc. •, ' •.•.•E'.: • t -. • • • • •-•.: r • 7 : • -t*-- ••• • .• ; • • ; 14•. • • Statutory Warranty Deed .• THE cat% NTon ' . 1:t.t w: ..,• :• f. •.• • •rr : r .n jid „fl !: •-••••7.•:!:.• • • . : . •.:••• .-• -•• " !he (..ilow on,/ •P the ...In.% .4 .St.tte-f : t -1r t 1:-•. . .7".•:•.1:•—•7 77 •:••••r 1.• 7,t•-• •tr•t• -•.• rr-•••••• •••••••:". :7r - .tat".• 7 :•••7•.•7r.t-.". :-tr:: • ".••:. - tr.:: r.- .7 r.••• ••••• .• -r - ■ 7r•:•• -• • !nr -•?* "" • . ••• • 77 • ir • -r. -t• r ''••• ••• • !“..• i'.7!":". 1!1.1' •""' F. .•-• "..• tr. :•1•.•-• : . •,r. !:.-. 7' 7 • - " -r.• r-t", ! • - • • : •••••.:-•• :1•-:: • ::- • •• • • ' : • • . T . •! .!-:*•••": .-•••:••%•7:-•`!• •'•'" ' • r. 7!-.: • r • • r • . : •!. . • •- t r • I, cr4 • " .": " •:•:•• . . •••• • ••"e•••.... •••• • . •-i, • • •• • -III : •,•••. t. ••• • .1 •! I IF '4 •••" • ./ • ••".. • . .••••• eif -; I 1' •t• ••10.•••:f: • .I• . •rnmot•ooneei •Iul •••■••■•, •••••••••no:Is ••••• t•• •••• sr.! - • •••■ Ir. 1.: :•••• ' I • 1141 • •:•••• M 11070()f 5 That po :en o: .._t 8, a;:a _ ?. rl `c,: 2. F.rst 1.3d :..-.. _c sea's Home Tracts. a.:co: i:.:•i _.:e ;;:at •::•t:ea: r. cC:.ieU ::: '.'elhme 12 or Plats, page 5C, in KtnqC :enty, t :.ls:li::•jton. de:,cr bed a.. fell.-s: the Werth 'ire of Sc_• :50th Bey :nrinq at the ... :crst•_t :c :l of - -• O. 1; Street, ain3 `;;r! c ,ea: e:.y :::le! of �t :its Road : O. , thence north 18°28.40" east 3 :..::y the ea..•.eriy line of ::a:3 road 126.43 feet to the rue beginning -` of beginning which on the rcrth line of the scut :. 20 fee: of said Lots :7 and 28 _s measured along the eaeteriy li..e thereof; thence south 89°44'10" east along said north :isle_ 90.31 feet t.. a •point on the east line of Lot 27 and whtcr is 120 feet north o: the scutheast corner thereof; thence north 0°33.50" west along the east Line of Lots . ' and 8, a distance of 220.39 'eet; thence north 89 °44'10" vest 1 : :.00 feet to the east line of State Road No. 1; thence on said east line south :S °25'40" west 222.00 feet to the true point of beg:rnteg. AND That portion of Lot 26, Block 2, _aid plat, describe;. as ..._lows: Commencing at the _. ^ tersectten cf the north 1 .ne of S e.._ : 1SCth Street and the east . :^:e of State Road `!o. 1 (Highway 4 -): thence north 18 °28'40 "• east, along the easterly :.rte e: said road. 126.43 feet to the true point cf heq :rrlc:q, which is on the Wert-`• line of the south 120 feet of said Lots 27 and 28 as cease:led along the easterly line thereof: thence south 89 °44'10" east, a :oog said north line. :90.3: tae: to a point on the east line of Let 27 and :htch is 120 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence :forth 00°33'50" west. a:..:•; the c• -_ Line cf Lot 27, a distance of 55.59 feet to the true oo.n: of begInn_:g; thence north 00`33'50" west a:o:::, the east 1_re of Lot _ , a distance of 13 -.4S fee: to the i. : :e .f _t 27, east l the .north' 1.: a _. :tot 26 w: c:: line is a thence eas 2J . J� a cW ^, _ •• •- proict:yation of ::c north Line of _=t 27; thence southwest :39.C. feet to the ._.:e point of nni T0Z7T.._R WITH an easement _or Inetess and ceress ever that pert._.. cf Lot 26. 5.:c< 2. ~dun's -_re . :act- :at Ad:i:_.cn. asserdtng the plat thereof recorded ..._re 12 of ?Cats, page 5:, .n King Ccun:y, Was :nylon; Cc-- a :._.. - at _.._ 1 :.terse:-__.. cn _. :e north lire of S:::_:: 150th feet ^art _as- -e c: State =cad ::o. 1 (H: .:a! ca); :;:...se .._.:.. _2 __ •:0 ?a._ ^ _.:e easterly i:ne of said .cad. 126.43 felt tc the _:e cc...t o_ ee.1 :......:g, which to on the ,teeth '. .:e of the seeth 120 feet _. :aid -__s and 2S as -eaeuled along the easterly . : : :e •here•:f . t:: =.. :c so:._: S?'44' l0' ca:.:. a:_. -; sal:.' ..'rte: line 190.31 feet to a point c n the east ...:e c. 27 and ...rich .0 120 feet north of the scntheas: corner •::e: a f; thence ..c. _.. °'3 52 _ -• ll_he the east line of :tot 27 a d:st .ace of .17.3.3- teet -_ the .._ to l..:e of Lot 27; thence east 23.3: feet atolls the n...th i:ne of _o- -c .hick 1:t:e is :,.: •' cf Lot re the true _.:lt of a roll• ;. -=•• -- :. .._. _.. __.. thence so:_...•. :.. . a T the c3.._ of Farcel C. ''0 fee.: thence e.tst feet pa :.1 :1_1 7c the ... :.. line :6: t`•ehce nottheac:er1y 7C . :ri. ,... t'.: the east 1Inc of :arcel C to the north 1:n. :home •'__- .._ fee: ]:_. •j the ....o 3f Lot 2C to the true pc..._ of 333 b 47 >8 8 8 q8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF LOTS 8, 27, MID 28 IN BLOCK 2 OF FIRST ADO4ON TO ADAM'S HOME TRACTS, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PUTS. PAGE 50. RECORDS OF KING COUIIIY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING Al THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH UNE OF SOUTH 150TH STREET AND THE EASTERLY LINE Of STALE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE NORTH 16 28' 40 EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD, 126.43 FEET 70 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING WHICH 15 ON THE NORTH UNE Of. 1HE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 28 AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89 44' 10 EAST ALONG SAID NORTH UNE, 190.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST UNE OF LOT 27 AND WHICH 15 120 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. THENCE NORTH 00 33. 50' WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF LOTS 27 AND 8, A DISTANCE OF 220.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 44' 10' WEST. 114.60 FEET TO THE EAST UNE OF STATE ROAD NO. 1; THENCE ON SAID EAST UNE SOUTH 18' 28' 4(7 WEST, 232 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 26 IN BLOCK 2 OF SAID PUT, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING Al THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH UNE OF SOUTH 150TH STREET AND ME EASTERLY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. I; THENCE NORM 16 28' 40 EAST ALONG 1410 EASTERLY UNE OF SAID ROAD, 126.43 FEET 70 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING WHICH IS ON THE NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 28 AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89' 44' 10' EAST ALONG SAID NORTH UNE. 190.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST UNE OF LOT 27 AND WHICH IS 120 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; 01 4 04 NORTH 7 .8 3' 50' WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF LOT 27. A OF 55. OCT T FEET 10 THE TRUE POINT OFT UNE OF THENCE 33' 50- WEST ALONG THE EAST UNE OF LOT 27, A DISTANCE .48 FEET TO THE NORM UNE OF LOT 27; THENCE EAST 23.34 FEET ALONG THE NORM LINE OF LOT 26 WHICH LINE IS A PROLONGATION OF TILE NORTH LINE OF LOT 27; THENCE SOUTHWEST 139.06 FEET TO THE 16441 POINT OF BEGINNING; (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT A OF LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT N0. 983059, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0. 8901160986) SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. CONSCRUCOON GEMS 10 BE MEN TO A KING COUNTY LANDFILL M RECYONC 1ACU1Y. DISPOSAL. 9ES ND GENERAL 4006AT10 CM BE OBTAINED BY CUING 1140 DIG cowry SCUD WASE 9NSKN AT (206) 296 -4440. 2. ERUSM CONTROL IEA9AI5 (IE. SILT FENCE) 18151 BE NS1N1E0 BEFORE OLSILRBRIG ANY 5OL ASSOC81(0 WIN 460 DEN4U1101 AC0917 3 DE 60J4DAD10 OF 144E ERSOIG BLMODIGS 654 FE REAMED COIPILTELY AID OE NOTES RUM 81144 10 -940 5CN5 1N( MALE O NNE 940 NISI BE S600U 4. NON TID4LUIDN 6 CONFUTE A INSPECTION RILL EE RIMMED, BY RE 017 Of 944091. 5. PRIM TO 098000* O EACH 9AONG HL ASBESTOS COTTONING MATERIALS (MRS) 44051 BE 90160400. 5. ALL ERSTNC BEES TO RERAN PROVIDE 1(NONC AT DRPIIES FILTER FABRIC INTERIM, .106.61 10DB 10 EQUAL USE STAPLES M WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE 2- .2'.44 W. WELDED WIRE FABRIC M (GIRL BUIOIM AREA (4) 5,528 615 -R72J 3.150 6 F „7 F! I / /17 it/4"/p/ rr �i // ! it /. / J /j71, _/ [ //L rII (WT( LOG110* 0 IST1NG GAS TOE 10 8( //, D(IIRL'IS*(D (ITP) //(8101 5000 EMRGl AS -91111 f0111RACTM 10 DUO KRI T. / Ali U111 9F w I 4441E 4 C 451440 GA5 14)160454(0(1 TRACT( 6601)0 1 OR COMM KO DO DM? Sno ov.ecu xNpR 10 111F ocelown [SUR NO USED AS moo 'NW ro %Rocs no dTM Ammons Cr De MAW OWL CAP (USING SANITARY --- r 41 5[1(05 AT PROPERTY UNE. C011UCTM r0 COORS LOCATION. 111ER F 4 FENCE 10 *100)617 UNE \S E DETAI�: twrE L04A1409 O ISIING SEWN 1180 (TIP) - /. vN 181E 4140 0 815111401 AS-6/11.1.) MA DOSING IEEE ARP I CONIRACIM 10 f I(LD 9(0414. c;\ I ` GENERAL R ('YP� gE�NOttc ALOE LQP,M, 11 \CAA B W W GRAPHIC SCALE 1b• 106 STEEL 4(410E I A POSTS 0 4'0.0.(144.) BURT f 11ER FABRIC IN TRENCH TILLED WIN GRAVEL RACE - FILL TER MA116 SECTION A -A NOTE: 1POI CE PLEIIM Of IK PROJECT M WIN DIRECTED BY T1( DINER, TIE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE UNDYED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND DISPOSED Of BY TIE 604T9ACT01. FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL 1415 CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT SEATTLE OW LICIT AND PUGET SOUND ENERGY TWO (2) WEEKS PRIOR TO BEONN(NG DEIIOUTION OF GAS AND POWER CONNECTIONS. MriVialiffitkint ELIMEIMAII FratiriVin! '1 ,' Etir(h eF �I r� IaI_IA I 1.,1':[41 111I:� ■ L VICINITY MAP 1101 10 YALE LEGEND 411191 MOW ID10E 01 0 P4 ASNAL1 EL CAS via. WE MOULT C8• 5195 C(1DUIION 181 WATER METER L:J POTTER POE -t Cur• 6I 41O1M - - -� CATCH BON 01001 MAN OLIVINE 471 5106 MAN 1140 A44Y1T CMLRTE ".F 901 Ei RATER Y[IR SARINY SEWER Sall/TURF 1. smear 4WIR III ' " 55 90111 444E 'D 040 NYDRMl0 ( 1. mCE O P8408180 - Er' - l•_ EROSCN /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES L APPROVAL OF 14 EROSION 004910 ( ESC) RANI DOES NOT CONSIILII M 9PP6ovAL ET PERNANFHI 10AD M MAN.ATE Mum 0 404. 960 AND IOCAI1N 0 NODS APES RES1RC10RS, CHANNELS, MENTION (A191905 541400, (111 1 DE %MUNE/ ,400N O FE ESC RAMS AND OE C151RUC110 4, NANNNAACLIEP160YM1 910 1PMAONO O 8(4 ESC FAN1115 15 OE R(SPO6BIIY O OE A PUCN1A4 9RTM50B UM All CONSOOCIION IS ARROYO. 3 DE BOADN4ES OF OE CLEARING TATS MOW 09 IK ESC RAN swill 84 QUAY 419030 BT A C 411001 15 UN0M O 9 *404 (M 4N06G, E RECA.95) PR06 I0 COISIRUCUON OIRNG DE 1090911110144149416, NO DISTURBANCE B( MID THE FLAGGED CLFMNC MIS SHALL BE RANITIED. 190 OEANN6 414115 SHALL BE KANT/TED Br OE APRCANTAISC 9PW4501 FOR THE WRADEN O WNSOOCOOL 4. Of ESC DOMES SNOW ON 0E4 PUNS WST BE CINSRWCIIO PROP 10 OR N CONAINCOW 180 All WANG AND CIUDNG 93 AS 10 061.0 THAI DE TRANSPORT O 9748)11 TO 9RFACT WAEA9 MANAGE 5154065 AN) WACLIT PRO(RQS 6 441441200 5 DE DC 440LIIE5 WWI 10 Of 109C RAN NE OE AWN RECIARDEll1 FOR NIIOP.109 910 CO1011016. DING DE C105184(1LON PERKO. MESE ESC 4ACURES SHALL TE UPGRADED, A5 NQOm, TOR INDPECIED 5106 (Y(NTS NO NODOFD TO ACOO T FM 006040 91E C01O1196 (E.G., AT011U4( SUMP PUPS. REIOCAIUN O 910(5 AND SET (ENCES ETC.). L DE ESC DAILIES 9WL EC N9iCE0 OMIT BY THE APPLICANT /ESC 9ALRWSOI AND 44ANTANO 10 ENTIRE COMM PRIER FLOIC1104111 MIEN REWROS 918L BE OPT O OEM 6 4(65 O DE 101 FAOl11E5 OURNG DE W:T SEASON ( OCTOBER 1 10 APRIL 30) ARID O vanity REMEIS OR80 DE M) 41004 (44441 1 10 91189088 301 7. NT ARIAS O' DAZED SOILS N1060T40 409044 118*N0415 NAr Nu N01 BF DISTURBED FOR 2 DAIS DING DE 1E1 SEASON AND 7 DAYS OWNO M 417 SEASON Doll BE 444(080111 STABI17ID WN DE 0600 ESC 44CMOBi (I6, SIO64 WIC NO MAC 1040644 (ICI L NT AREA *404494 6C TEAMS S OUT DO *OT KWIC mama AMNO N 961 BE AMSTED MINN 15 DAYS L OE ESC POLITIES 10 *ACM 901) DWI E INSPECTED AND 0NN1MED A maw Cr 0110 A WHIN M WHY 140E 40 HORS 41110640 A 51016 E4EN1. 0 AT NO 144E SHALL 440E MN 1-41601 cf Si0*N011 BE ALLOW) 0 91.401140910 0DIN A CATCH BASAL. All CATCH 119969 6442 M65EYNCE IN6 %Au BE 0EN0 RCM W PAWL Of 0INN/ CPERAMN 94411 NOT flu% 40011 -UED1 WRIER NO 1E DO461RU9 SYSTEM It 5TA 1800 CO61RUC110 1918N(A5 N ROWS SILL BE 446194100 AI THE BE9ANN0 Cr 0761R1C101 AND IL MANED FOR Of O1RAIDN O 1140 POO.ECI. AR0AD09A1 MEASURES 9101 AS 1694 PADS MAT BE 80W113 TO DEJA RUT ALL PARO AR( IEPT CUM FM 144E 9RAI109 or 140 P140EC1. It 444 PDCUIEN1 RON {CAMEL FACER USED AS A 1E1E0AM SETTING Bias 9181 40 NOOEYD IBM OE 14085581 040910 0101601 NEAWE5 AND 9161 FROSOC AOEOU10 51MA4E CNAOIY. F DE 4901116 6 10 (UCINI LLIIIAELY AS N Nf*1RADEN SIS101. OE EIPoRART MOLLY MUST BE CREED SO WHAT THE 8011044 NO DOES ARE AT LEAST 3 RFT AB074 TIE FINN LODE O OE PEi6A*(NI 090114. 11 WI$ SWAN YO04 fM IDPORNI 00909 006OrO 6 RE0NE4 11 94111 BE ARMED AI Al A IDWUN WITNESS 0 2 10 3 INCHES 14. PALM 10 DE sumac O DE NET 49509 (OCTOBER 11 ALL 95106ER AREAS SHALL 4 9(119440 10 DENOY NEON ONES CAN BE SEEDED N PREPARATION FOR 1140 0N1IR RAINS 061UNND OCAS 9811 BE SEEDED NDN 1 WFN O THE 904)44446 O THE 4l %ASYL A 9ETC4* NAP O 1X04 AREAS 70 BE sumo AND IN04 AREAS 10 EEMAN 1010016000 SHALL RE 9NNTIE0 10 DE 0111f 1106146 N4(CIM THE 016 N9'EC1M CAN NO VE 4IDNC Cf ADDITIONAL AREAS N OVER 10 PROTECT SW4ACE TIMERS ADJACENT PRCEERE5 M MANAE FAO/IDES UTUTIES/PURVEYORS STOMA DRAINAGE CITY Of 1UKWLA RYAN LARSON (206) 433 -0179 SMEARY SEWER VALNIE SEWER 0151. ACCT. 9173153 STEW FLECIHER (206) 242 -3236 WATER K.C. WATER 0151.9 125 ACCT. /0311 -501 ACCT. /00- 41- 000130 ROSS AU5TN (206) 242 -9547 NATURAL GAS PuGE1 SOUND ENERGY (P5E CORLA 5HEA (206) 766 -6782 ELECTRICITY SEATTLE CITY UGHT BOB HANSEN (206) 386 -1670 TELEPHONE OLIEST (800) 244 -1111 CABLE AT &T BROADBAND APPLICANT /OWNER MCCONKEY DEVE1OP44ENT COMPANY 3006 NORTHRUP WAY, SUITE 101 6(111 E, WA 98004 (425) 889 -1180 SURVEYOR EARMTECH 720 S 333RD STREET. SUITE 200 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 (253) 838 -6202 ASBESTOS SURVEYOR ADAP1 ENGINEERING B00 MAYNARD AVENUE S., SATE 403 SEATTLE- WA 98134 (206) 654 -7045 2 10 -16 -00 AOB CATS RR41 9461I16. RER010 10 -11 -0 644 NM 185 PER411 91641I1AL GRAIN BY DOMED BY SW 101 0(0.07 BY N4RO(0 B4 OA10 13 OCT CO CALL 48 COWS BEM YOU DIG I-800-424.5555, N0. DATE BY CND. APPR. REN9ON J 0 B NA : 141392 SCALE rn Cm*I8i19 (n9nr4 HA 1484 A.e..• &IY 400 SCREW WLWN901 9904 2061622.S= Fax DM 621,637 McCONICEY DEMOLITION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON STET DEMOLITION PLAN 1 1' GU/ TT Pt LEGAL DESCRIPTIO'1 MAT DoRROV or LOTS E. 2.', ANC 31 IEI TTLCC< : gr FIRST ALOfON '0 sow's H01AE TRACTS. AS PECDROEt DI V'SLUILE 12 Or PLATS. PALE 50. PECC0OS Or KING COD1rr DESCRIBED A5 FOUL1T45 BEGI1w19.; AT THE INTEF5:7110N Or HIE NORTH UNE Cr SOAR. 150TH STREET AHD THE LAS'TE911 LINE Or STATE ROAD HO. 1; THENCE NORI4 18 28' 40' UST A&ON0 THE EASTERLY LINE Or SAID ROAD. 126..3 rECT TO THE TRUE POINT Or BEGINNMG a*ICH 15 ON INC NORTH UNE OF THE S?OT1 12o FEET 0' SVC LOTS 27 AND 29 AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE T1-[PECF: T/EACE Solrii S9 4* IC EASr ALONG SAW HORN UNE, 190.31 FED TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE Of LOT 27 AND 894EN 15 120 IE'ET NORTH OF TAIL SOUTHEAST =FLIER THEPiDr; THENCE NORTH CC 33' XX," NESE ALCHD THE FIST LP*E OF LOTS 27 Ar40 6. A DISTANCE OF 220.39 FEET; T}ERCE NORTH 80' 44 10' WEST, 110.80 FEET TO THE EAST UNE Or STATE ROAD NO •• THENCE 01 SNC EAST UWE SOUTH IT 28' AO' REST. 232 MET TO THE POINT OF 1Et11a+1HG; 4hC •HA' 20PTI:•11 Cr 842. 23 11 BLOC+' 2 OF SAID A"l", OE9^.1a0E0 lS 16EC0MM0 Al THE PFTERSECTEN Or THE NORTH UNE OF SOIRH 150TH S1tu. �C aa= tArrn`' 130E cr ST279 R1 E 'IC. •; THENCE te3R'94 1.8 :2' AO' CAST AL4`$• THE EASTERLY UNE Cf SAC ROAD. 12E13 • FEET FO 194c Dn.( Pont or BEGINNNEA Arco. LS ON :hE NCPTH .NE OF n THE SCUT,' 120 rat F SVO ton 21 AND 28 As TWJASUREO ALONJ THE EASrCRti UNE TAEREJ-, 7•ENCE scjrl 59' a*' IC,' EAST ALONG SAW NORTH L1NE, 190.1 reT 10 A PUTT ON THE EAST USE Cf LOT 27 aro TrMCN 15 120 FEE' H.OR711 OF 101E SOOTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: �. MENCE MRTH OD 33" 50' WEST ALONG THE EAST UM OF for 2771i pSTAttCE Or 55.69 FEET TO THE ITVE F);FR 01 99091/401w 1HENCp NORTH 00 33' 90- *ES- ALO10 T1-E EAST LINE Or LOT 27, A M A NCE `y Si or 137.48 'E 1 TO THE k)RTE U•t Or LO' 21; THENCE EAST 21.34 FEET .'(1 Q ALONG TIE MOM LINE 01 10T 26 91113h UNE IS A RROLOIGA11011 Or $ THE 90074 ;NE Or WI 27; ei■n. :E 5o111.1.1EST 129.76 FEET 10 ME TRUt POUR OF TEAT.NrAC: 7[ (A150 MOAN 05 LOT OF tOl Leif 4D.AFSTUENT IC. 983059. PECORCEO UNDER REC.G2111G 111 590:1808E51 SITUATE 111 THE OTT OF TLKANUA. :CUArr M 1(N3. STATE Or K•A9416T011. EQUIPMENT UcED LtEAS TV Erd SUVA TECHNICAL Sv Y TECHNICAL DATA -Hs TUR.tr NEts Of 810 EL5 PEOLAIENENTS AS SET FLY.- •H AvaG 332- 130r000. FELD TFW4'21 EITHCO. tiQIE 7H6 SURVEY DOES Not RLVPOR1 00 SHOW ANY EASENCOS MOH TNOSt AS Votes. SURVEYOR'S CERUFICATE Pis nap ev redly •esesents a srvey made by ne Or order nF dY•eetitn h coneOr'.Onc• ehh thy reoulrerhente or the survey r•eecr*'o ac/ it the remost cF 11CLOPE Y DEVt1.0h491.0 COIPANT h AP RR_ , 1999 bs0t18. v. v2Com CertlrEete Ib.21601 IN..I1i�- i_UIINJTt I.I „L .:i E r% S. I . 841 ASI-Iif`:Ij TUN — _______— _ S 87:2'SS' E . I j) / Y., / 1 / 8 I / r I r $ 9 r o / I I z 2648.29' S 8::7'2 *' E 8 h SOUTH 148TH ST 17171.74` 1157.09' 20001147 EASE•HENT FE0 RECOROPE NO. 8311070037 i:i. s: wrot'53' E 27 128.67' S c 1'5? 9 SOUTH 15OTH ST PRELIMINARY COPY 1157.11 1111.4; r i� 1t 1, 2 r- IICAD DRAWING In ISTDD -51 INOE(10G DATA, SV 1 SE 1/4 SEC 22, T 23 N, R 4 9, V.N. REC971m146 9eCl RECQDCNS CfRI1r0CATE r9ee Far eeco l thee_ee■ of 10__ at, n In book ot of toot___. .4 the rte Rest of Pr. S Dt of Recoros RECORD OF SURVEY FOR M:CONKEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY E A R T H 10100 IL ON R Tr, now ed ►M MODn Ass ea -MI v T . E C H 1184 a 1131- 11. 100 IA Oee.II. A As rs 6 11��e N ISM - am+ 0111.14-400! AA8 >oG PRAWN Or Tvv DATE APRIL 1999 1570 0 -CCYED 07 S'I :KHAN SCALE •57 SFEE T I Or 1 :12538740577 RECEIVED DATE : 04/30 10:28'99 / / SOUTH 150TH 11113133- I :12538740577 RECEIVED DATE : 04/30 10:29'99