The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E01-004 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PARKS AND RECREATION - CASCADE VIEW PARKCASCADE VIEW PARK DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 14325 37T" AVE. S. E01 -004 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: COPY: MEMORANDUM Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Rick Still, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation June 26, 2003 Cascade View Community Park — Five Cedar Trees Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation co t- ooq t -OL6 settdt Rmufrai- (70,00A\ Per our discussion, please find the attached June 12, 2003 consulting arborist's report regarding the condition of the five Western Red Cedar trees at Cascade View Community Park. You will note that two trees to the south (closest to the road) are dying and are recommended to be removed. Two trees are in weak condition and one is in average condition. We will be performing the recommended measures to help facilitate the longevity of the three trees to remain. Meanwhile, we will be removing the two dying trees. In addition to planting approximately 60 trees in the park, we are looking at replacing these two trees with two Leyland Cyprus trees. These replacement trees are fast growing, drought tolerant, and look very similar to the Western Red Cedar. We will be planting the trees in the same location as the two trees that are being removed. Please see the attached site planting plan to accommodate this action. RS RKENED it. 2 / 2003 OOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Trce Memo to Carol 6-26 -03 NOTES: 1. MONDE RANI 1401(9101 444.1 14111 57E5 AND TYPES 0000 40 1M PLANTING USI ANC, ARE 9111 BRANCHED AND 5014(10( *L is TORN, ■1010. (*1511NG 000.41005 PRIOR 10 BEGneome PORK AND REPORT m 901100 TO OWNER'S 0(PR(SENIAln1 DEVIATIONS OR 10011(15 0(IN170 00.411405 AND 511E CONOTION5 3 ARP1 LOCATOR O u0D( #GR0uID 44TL11(5 09404 10 BEGINNING RORK. • EGO (R(( 000 52030 PLANTING 4115 P40410( [0x0051 PER SPCC✓ICAIO*S. W6CD TPOROJGNL1. 500 -502 400 (RISING 501 790x01 Ralf TIED IE(44 :7(0 CO2515141G O 71 CHAR. 540. RELEASE. 70 -40 -5 1A0LC IS. 000 GRANNO AR SLOP R(L(•5(, 4_44 -1* 0514000IL *00451709, APPLIED PER 0A*Ur*CIU9E0'S 9(CON14(NOAl,00S. 5 SNOW, GRAD[ AND 010105(10 0S1*R0(0 54491*CES !KAI ARE ROT 1401[0 10 9E PLANTED w N RIES • • %NAUSS 0/0005(00 510001 RILL 4001040 5((D. 1(01417(7 • BONDED TIBER M•W* 15 NOTED w SP(C ✓(.(IONS 6. PROTECT ALL TREES 10 RERAN AS !LAGGED 51 PROJECT (062((9, 7. N *011 TOPSOIL (011 114E PROJECT. 02L CONSIST Of E*5141G ON 514 SOL EAC•v*1ED *NON 119 100 0• 100115 190( 1000 4t VELE TAILS MATTER AND ANY ROCK I DINER 0[0915 LARGER 121* 7- N *14(1[9. e 410RO50(0(0 09•55 •R(4S 50101E BE SPOOL. GRADED TO ILEV *1005 500914 0* OR0*90GS 911* ALL LOOSE 0(9015. ROCK 9C0OLTO P90R TO 5(00450. M( ONLY 0100050(000 01.55 AREA 10 0E4(14 Woof 100500 SNALL B( 10( *0(0 *1(4(1(0 By 51•041* 041(001005 Al In( NORTH [ND O( 147E PROJECT 511[. 9 STAKE ALL MC AND 5■10)9 LOC •1005 100 OMER'S APPROVAL. "Remove trees Replace in same location with.two. Leyla nd Cypress.- PLANT LIST © [454140* NAME 901004[04 PARC VILLS CO2N11D(• • VIN( OAaLE 6 141: B•0 - • 91501 • 15(40110 6' 01.: 0•B -�((4 P41u*I3M- 4(( CORN ' -- '104l5 50(41' S(9NC(BLRR1 1' 04: B•6 - A*(L*0 G.- '401(5 5(4[46 10(( K *15049. 10(1, " „ ", 7' C4,: B•0 C(RCINP*niu14 1400X0 '� -0411 9x.040[0" 0 0 ✓D v 0 ICY POU5* 0060(000 1 441., 0•B -(00455 •045* (0(1 (OW* [011101,79 410041 000'!0,04 5 N(.: B•B • 400455 4 *5 - '- 1ul'• "93224' 11840 [100(55 _ 5' 141 B•B O CUPO1S50Cro.WK- L[¢.**06 - (*14 • BuSd" W5,0C9 *6 110RL *WC P7A4 7- C4 B•B -0+005 C4i(9,'00,S101001' - "9011 00044444[0' 54.4111 MLR( 7- 104. B•B 004(4145 COCCO *(4' - APA*45l 50009(11 7" C4 B•B "5105.7 *5100(2[* '_.._. .. -9141 09.0[100" 'GR((45P19E' 1110[9 7- C4. BeB -1904 6a041o'04C(ii5P16r-'9(11 9000440 E 0451144 9(0 4LD*R 6 01.: BEI0 R ' -10UY 00(44(4 0(l • 01501 1451.14 PARg01u _ 7- C!LL BeB I �I�4 - 119901,* PE00C* -" , . 0411 64.11140 0 v 0 v v G921000L105 INRC* '**14[0441 4 *OE' i P015 ARC10'14 '0*000 4001' - POLL BUSO1 T14(R540 1.0701' R'074 i 00(5 0, (i11. "(4(0010 4 1' -1451 BUSHY L.4N50 L *020[0 G*[. 4001. A 4 ".i.c' '45951[•0' -. "__t0([ eus�:...... BULBS t ?144010015 400[445- P0001(, 90?( Bw05 P100110 GRONS SPEC115 ' " -' "6'OC. '144[619' CPOCOS41* BULBS "Vl*w LCD 0140( 471.[41 (N ., _ -Ow95 c. ?1,!51[0 • 035109: 5001[5 -- " -._. R' o N.rR10N45 Bides 00041100 05535 "570(4(5" -e' Dc' I05IPS -9(0 . (*141( BULBS PLANTED_ 10.100 *0041(5 - "- 6 -.ILL- . v L. re. AMAX AM AEL 'Ur vr (1410 •`�e 0�i ®s 00 •�A T_O e n 45.545 1 :--- CALLJfNDERCROUND UIIL(TY LOCATE SERVICE: ( -amb -421- 5555 -TDA YS BEFORE OICC(NC. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING- STREETS - WATER -SE WEN- PARKS- BUILDING TLJ 6AOUD 1 s •IA SH., * 90007 144'17 ) 7_1770 r*. 1793)017.1m N (4 SITE PLANTING PLAN PLANT LIST: e C NAM( B10 BOTANICAL ARE WNW e D9AR( 5(R*R6ER01 (*00 Y "0MOU1u5 U. '14500[14 GR(00140015' AZ*L(* (9 - *754[4 '04(10 LIGn15 9451E 1(4415' A7*4(0 i[ "AZ4(0' r0T0 4460(5' v v v v m v v &111[0111 905N 944045(4* DARN 'LOCWR4? '011001*' C(AN005 CLARE1ws w. ',MDR,' __ 90411 RO(00051 05135 "CORB0R(555. PURR( 9040005E [151015 RMPU*(U5 PINK 00[14006 "(45105 50400[00 50491.11 DOOR= CORNUS A.'ELEG4*l5S41i [01401100 u•: 1GA 10' min: 145L7,' • 10' 4 : I GAL.: TULL • 9435111 19- 144:44., 3 601: ru11 • 91521 '0410 6(ORGC B1 *1444 0- mom: 1 OAL.: [WCA CO24*(0'RIOG 0[011([' ruu • 90511 'VIED awn' 14•5(0 (0- m..: BeB. (RICO *471' RN51S 4004 • , 606. DRAB( 9044915[ 9350' 10. 9444.; 1 G4.: (045 'NUS 541 COMPAC Ii TULL • BUSK, C0.IA0M3s 15' m..: ] G4.: EWUAN(HUS CANPANULUS FULL • BOSKY 10(400014* 16- m...: 3 *21 I05100451* 6*00(99 1410 • 005•4 eCOWS w:(COAZEI_ N ClK 1445115 LL 8045141 D[11VA1 OS14wINy5 le- mom; ] 04.: T "" OYIA*llw5 45101044 Ult a 9445141 e Yl. fM[' P4y S _ - 74915 "517. f01(' 1 L R 904501 O 1.000 TERN I4- * : I GAL wnllow uuWTUR r L • eusN. P ORTUGAL IAMRCI t9- Inn: 3 G4.: PRUm15 LDS..RCA AN LRU50aE' 01100. :o03:49: : Beg. 401 '0000 KRU51,06 .. 9445111 "- 'B09 0(115' 900D000NOR01 la- mi.: Bee._" 0N0000(NGROri '90* BELLS' ruu • 605101 • [1491511..5 CUTER' 9000, C0W51*A5 04(0' U45l • BUSN1 '[09014145(' 0NODO04*DRON 45 min: Beg:. 9N0000EN090i 400405(- 05 PULL • BU50• �L�( *054450 RNODO**ORON 101 mn 0 0•e; *0▪ 0(01 906'0.141145! " 4a' •; 90, '1.45045' RNODDDEHDRD44 10- mi. � e e: - 911ma4cxDRa'(Awbs' r NI/ W n ULL • 00501 0 v m v AIL v m 010 T1.001900 CL0905l 171 0544 1011.: RIDES 5014451[45 ruu • 914 01 004005* ap5( u' min 7 GAL RO5* 9110050 "- Ras • 941511 '40(000, 9.1[4[9' 5010[. 15- mw. 579(4 Bw40•'*04, 90100' (010 • 9U501 04x0 VIBUR0I14 _ 40- 0544; 1 c4: INBUOMw DAVOR rutl • 01450,1 Dww((a[ 14091245 19- m�; ] uL, ' ` x940 (0 Ia. '*1.(4511' 49- s 904511 V m '5741(0 0011010 6 48ux0w 40- mn: 3 054: 0- -B. ONU5'57411 00I000r WOIL • 0445011 TIN • : • RO5(i' 91[[44* IB" mw.: ) G4: V`) - 041G(LA ".0((e 805(5' "ruu • 9045441 V op RROAN•3 Yea,. G.tics t'2 YE-t 6-)Z-o3 a Gilles Consulting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5- 8 2 2 - 4 9 9 4 June 12, 2003 Rick Still, Assistant Director Tukwila Parks and Recreation 12424 42nd Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 SUBJECT: EVALUATION OF FIVE CEDAR TREES AT CASCADE PARK AT THE CORNER OF 37TH AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 144TH STREET, TUKWILA, WA Dear Mr. Still, As you requested, this morning I went to the corner of 37th Avenue South and South 144th Street, to the new Cascade Park that is under construction. You requested that I evaluate a row of five trees to determine if they could be retained or if they should be removed. METHODOLOGY: To evaluate the trees and to prepare the report, I drew upon my 20+ years of experience in the field and my formal education in Natural Resources Management, Dendrology, Forest Ecology luation, Plant Identification, and Plant Physiology. I also followed the protocol of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for Hazard Tree Assessment while looking at the overall health of the trees and the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, the surrounding land and the soil, as well as a complete look at the trees themselves. In examining each tree, I looked at such factors as: size, vigor, crown ratio and class, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging limbs. While no one can predict with absolute certainty which trees will or will not fall, we can, by using this scientific process, assess which trees are most likely to fail and take appropriate action to minimize injury and damage. The trees were tagged and numbered 1 through 5. The tags are made of shiny aluminum and are approximately 1 inch by 3 inches in size and are attached to the tree with short galvanized nails. The use of galvanized nails was to minimize rusting and streaking. Fax: 425-822-6314 E -mail: bkgilles @aol.com 12823 NE 107th Place Kirkland, WA 98033 Short nails were used so that they would not penetrate through the bark into the vascular cambium and potentially introduce pathogens. The tags were placed as high as possible to minimize their removal. The tags were generally placed on the backsides of the trees as inconspicuously as possible so as not to draw attention. OBSERVATIONS: The five trees are located in a row in the southwest corner of the park. The trees are all Western Red Cedar, Thuja plicata, and are all of similar size and age. In an effort to clearly present the information for each tree in a manner that facilitates the reader's ability to understand the conclusions I have drawn for each tree, I have collected the information onto a spreadsheet format. Please refer to Attachment 1, Tree Inventory/Condition Spreadsheet. The descriptions were left brief on the spreadsheet in an effort to include as much pertinent information as possible, to make the report manageable, and, to not bore the reader with infinite levels of detail. A more complete description of the terms used in the spreadsheet and in this report can be found in Attachment 2 , Glossary of Terms Used. A brief review of these terms and descriptions. will allow the reader to rapidly move through the spreadsheet and understand the information. DISCUSSION: Trees # 1, # 2, and #3, are dying rapidly. They have almost no foliage of their own. The vast majority of the green noted on the trees is actually an infestation of English Ivy, Hedera helix. There is some center rot in the trunks and the crowns are dying. The symptoms of decline are extreme and it is not possible to bring the trees back to health at this time. Trees # 4 and #5 are in decline but not as bad as the other three. The Ivy infestation is not as severe. However, the trees do show symptoms of serious decline. Current industry science does not allow us to accurately predict whether these trees can be returned to health or not. My training and experience lead me to the judgment that it is a 50/50 chance of survival. You could increase their survival opportunity by injection a combination of tree based fertilizer, beneficial fungi, and bacteria into the root zone. In addition, the trees need to be watered right away and watered every three to four weeks from now until the fall rains arrive in October or November. The best watering method is to use soaker hoses placed three feet from the trunk of the tree and spiraled around the tree covering the critical root zone. I would use at least two and possibly three 100 -foot soaker hoses on each tree. It is best to place the soakers using landscape staples, (available from HD Fowler in Bellevue for pennies apiece) then cover the area with some composed materials. The composted material will act as a Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 2 of 10 mulch to minimize evaporation and will also stimulate the microbial activity of the soil which is another benefit to the health of the tree. Water the trees to a depth of 18 to 20 inches. I recommended leaving the water on the soaker hoses over night and then digging down to determine how deep your water is penetrating. Then adjust accordingly. It may take a good two days of watering to reach the proper depth. Once the water reaches the proper depth, turn off the hoses for four weeks and then water again. Water more often when temperatures increase —every three weeks when temperatures exceed 80 degrees and every two weeks when temperatures exceed 90 degrees. This drying out of the soil in between watering is important to prevent soil pathogens from attacking the trees. CONCLUSION: It is likely that the five trees are suffering from three years of severe drought that we have experienced in the area. Cedar trees all over Puget Sound are dying at a rapid rate due to the recent droughts. My observation of the soil in the park today was that there was almost no water in the soil. Western Red Cedar trees require and tolerate more water than other native conifers. Again, let me state that it is uncertain whether or not trees # 4 and # 5 can be saved. However, the treatments noted above, watering and soil injections are the best known treatments currently in the industry and provide the best hope for saving the trees. If you would like help setting up the watering or arranging for the soil injection of the root zones I will be glad to assist you. WAIVER OF LIABILITY: There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. Adverse weather conditions can dramatically affect the health and safety of a tree in a very short amount of time. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. The tree Hazard Evaluation consists of an external visual inspection of an individual tree's root flare, trunk, and canopy from the ground only unless otherwise specified. The inspection may also consist of taking trunk or root soundings for sound comparisons to aid the evaluator in determining the possible extend of decay within a tree. Soundings Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 3 of 10 are only an aid to the evaluation process and do not replace the use of other more suited diagnostic tolls for determining the extent of decay within a tree. As conditions change is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long -term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required permits from the city, county, stated, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. If there is a homeowners association it is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC &R's) that apply to tree pruning and tree removal. This Tree Hazard Evaluation is to be used to inform and guide the client in the management of their tree(s). This in no way implies that the evaluator is responsible for performing recommended actions or using other methods or tools to further determine the extent of internal tree problems without written authorization from the client. Furthermore, the evaluator in no way holds that the opinions and recommendations are the only actions required to insure that the tree will not fail. A second opinion is recommended. Also, the client shall hold the evaluator harmless for all injuries or damages incurred if the evaluator's recommendations are not followed or for acts of nature beyond the evaluator's reasonable expectations, such as severe winds, excessive rains, heavy snow loads, etc. This report and all attachments, enclosures, and references, are confidential and are for the use of the client concerned. They may not be reproduced, used in any way, or disseminated in any form without the prior consent of the client concerned and Gilles Consulting. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs. I hope this report answers your questions. Please call me if I can provide more information or be of further service. Sincerely, Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist — PN -0260 ATTACHMENTS: 1 Tree Inventory/Condition Spreadsheet 2. Glossary of Terms Used 3. References Consulted 4. Invoice for Services Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 4 of 10 ATTACHMENT 1: SITE: Cascade Park TREE INVENTORY /CONDITION SPREADSHEET The corner of 37th Avenue South and South 144th Street DATE: June 12, 2003 #1 Tree#: Individual tree number. j #3 DBH: Trunk diameter @ 4.5' above average ground 1 Species: 1 1 #4 LCR: Live Crown Ratio, the amount of live canopy expressed as a % of the entire tree hei • ht _ 'TWRC/Tp = Western Red Cedar, Thuja plicata #5 Symmetry: general shape of canopy and weight distribution of the tree around the trunk. 1 __ #6 Foliage: general description of foliage density that indicates tree health and vigor. __t___ #7 Crown Condition: the most important external indication of tree health and vigor. #8 Trunk: description of trunk condition or abnormalities if any. 1 the area at the base of the tree where the trunk flares into the roots. Any deformities or problems are noted here. #9 Root Collar: #10 Roots: Root problems are noted here. 1 - #11 Comments: ■ 1 1 #12 Current Health Rating: a percentage rating of the condition of the tree. . #13 RECOMM.: Recommendation – based upon the evaluation of the tree, what is the best course of action. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CROWN 8 9 ROOT 10 11 12 CURRENT 13 TREE # SPECIES DBH LCR SYMMETRY FOLIAGE CONDITION TRUNK COLLAR Roots COMMENTS HEALTH RATING RECOMM. 1 WRC/Tp 18.7" 65% Gen. Sym. Chlorotic, sparse dying UBS 6' to base Ivy recent clearing potential center rot -- sounds hollow, ivy up 85% Dying Remove 2 WRC/Tp 18.8" 75% Gen. Sym. Chlorotic, sparse dying straight Ivy recent clearing Ivy up 95% Dying Remove 3 WRC /Tp 19.1" 75% Gen. Sym. Chlorotic, sparse weak slight bow Ivy recent clearing Ivy up 80% —� Dying Remove 4 WRC/Tp 15.5" & 12.5" 80% Gen. Sym. thin, chlorotic weak fork @ 3' fungal mycelium in duff layer recent clearing Poor Remove or Inject and Monitor 5 WRC/Tp 13.7" & 17.6" 80% Gen. Sym. thin, chlorotic average fork @ base Included Bark recent clearing, 5" root damaged and cut Poor Remove or Inject and Monitor Page 5of 10 ATTACHMENT 2, GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT, ON THE SPREAD SHEET AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE: In an effort to clearly present.the information for each tree in a manner that facilitates the reader's ability to understand the conclusions I have drawn for each tree, I have collected the information onto a spreadsheet format. This spreadsheet was developed by Gilles Consulting based upon the Hazard Tree Evaluation Form from the book, The Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas, by Matheney and Clarke. The descriptions were left brief on the spreadsheet in an effort to include as much pertinent information as possible, to make the report manageable, and, to not bore the reader with infinite levels of detail. A review of these terms and descriptions will allow the reader to rapidly move through the report and understand the information. 1) TREE # - -the individual number of each tree. 2) SPECIES —This describes the species of each tree with both most readily accepted common name and the officially accepted scientific name. 3) DBH— Diameter Breast Height. This is the standard measurement of trees taken at 4.5 feet above the average ground level of the tree base. i) Occasionally it is not practical to measure a tree at 4.5 feet above the ground. The most representative area of the trunk near 4.5 feet is then measured and noted on the spreadsheet. For instance, a tree that forks at 4.5 feet can have an unusually large swelling at that point. The measurement is taken below the swelling and noted as, `28.4" at 36 "'. ii) Trees with multiple stems are listed as a "clump of x," with x being the number of trunks in the clump. Measurements may be given as an average of all the trunks, or individual measurements for each trunk may be listed. (1) Every effort is made to distinguish between a single tree with multiple stems and several trees growing close together at the bases. 4) % LCR— Percentage of Live Crown Ratio. The relative proportion of green crown to overall tree height. This is an important indication of a tree's health. If a tree has a high percentage of Live Crown Ratio, it is likely producing enough photosynthetic activity to support the tree. If a tree has less than 30 to 40% LCR it can create a shortage of needed energy and can indicate poor health and vigor. 5) SYMMETRY —is the description of the form of the canopy. That is, the balance or overall shape of the canopy and crown. This is the place I list any major defects in the tree shape —does the tree have all its foliage on one side or in one unusual area. Symmetry can be important if there are additional defects in the tree such as rot pockets, cracks, loose roots, weak crown etc. Symmetry is generally categorized as Generally Symmetrical, Minor Asymmetry or Major Asymmetry: i) Gen. Sym.— Generally Symmetrical. The canopy /foliage is generally even on all sides with spacing of scaffold branches typical for the species, both vertically and radially. ii) Min. Asym. —Minor Asymmetry. The canopy /foliage has a slightly irregular shape with more weight on one side but appears to be no problem for the tree. iii) Maj. Asym. —Major Asymmetry. The canopy /foliage has a highly irregular shape for the species with the majority of the weight on one side of the tree. Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 6of10 This can have a significant impact on the tree's stability, health and hazard potential — especially if other defects are noted such as cracks, rot, root defects. 6) FOLIAGEBRANCH describes the foliage of the tree in relation to a perfect specimen of that particular species. First the branch growth and foliage density is described, and then any signs or symptoms of stress and/or disease are noted. The condition of the foliage, or the branches and buds for deciduous trees in the dormant season, are important indications of a tree's health and vigor. i) For Deciduous trees in the dormant season: (1) The structure of the tree is visible, (2) The quantity and quality of buds indicates health, and is described as good bud set, average bud set, or poor bud set. These are abbreviated in the spreadsheet as: gbs, abs, or pbs. (3) The amount of annual shoot elongation is visible and is another major indication of tree health and vigor. This is described as: (a) Excellent, Good, Average, or Short Shoot Elongation. These are abbreviated in the spreadsheet as ESE, GSE, ASE, OR SSE. ii) For evergreen trees year round and deciduous trees in leaf, the color and density of the foliage indicates if the tree is healthy or stressed, or if an insect infestation, a bacterial, fungal, or viral infection is present. Foliage is categorized on a scale from: (1) Dense — extremely thick foliage,, an indication of healthy vigorous growth, (2) Good —thick foliage, thicker than average for the species, (3) Normal/Average —thick foliage, average for the species, an indication of healthy growth, (4) Thin or Thinning— needles and leaves becoming less dense so that sunlight readily passes through; an indication that the tree is under serious stress that could impact the long -term survivability and safety of the tree, (5) Sparse —few leaves or needles on the twigs, an indication that the tree is under extreme stress and could indicate the future death of the tree (6) Necrosis —the presence of dead twigs and branchlets. This is another significant indication of tree health. A few dead twigs and branches are reasonably typical in most trees of size. However, if there are dead twigs and branchlets all over a certain portion of the tree, or all over the tree, these are indications of stress or attack that can have an impact on the tree's long -term health. (7) HANGERS —A term to describe a large branch or limb that has broken off but is still hanging up in the tree. These can be particularly dangerous in adverse weather conditions. 7) CROWN CONDITION —The crown is uppermost portion of the tree, generally considered the top 10 to 20% of the canopy or that part of the canopy above the main trunk in deciduous trees and above the secondary bark in evergreen trees. i) The condition of the tree's crown is a reflection of the overall health and vigor of the entire tree. The crown is one of the first places a tree will demonstrate stress and pathogenic attack such as root rot. Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 7 of 10 ii) If the Crown Condition is healthy and strong, this is a good sign. If the crown condition is weak, broken out, or shows other signs of decline, it is an indication that the tree is under stress. It is such an important indication of health and vigor that this is the first place a trained forester or arborist looks to begin the evaluation of a tree. Current research reveals that, by the time trees with root rot show significant signs of decline in the crown, fully 50% or more of the roots have already rotted away. Crown Condition can be described as: (1) Healthy Crown — exceptional growth for the species. (2) Average Crown typical for the species. (3) Weak Crown thin spindly growth with thin or sparse needles. (4) Flagging Crown describes a tree crown that is weak and unable to grow straight up. (5) Dying Crown describes obvious decline that is nearing death. (6) Dead Crown —the crown has died due to pathological or physical injury. The tree is considered to have significant stress and/or weakness if the crown is dead. (7) Broken out —a formerly weak crown condition that has been broken off by adverse weather conditions or other mechanical means. (8) Regenerated or Regenerating— formerly broken out crowns that are now growing back, Regenerating crowns may appear healthy, average, or weak and indicate current health of the tree. (9) SUPPRESSED —a term used to describe poor condition of an entire tree or just the crown. Suppressed crowns are those that are entirely below the general level of the canopy of surrounding trees which receive no direct sunlight. They are generally in poor health and vigor. Suppressed trees are generally trees that are smaller and growing in the shade of larger trees around them. They generally have thin or sparse needles, weak or missing crowns, are prone to insect attack as well as bacterial and fungal infections. 8) TRUNK —this is the area to note any defects that can have an impact on the tree's stability or hazard potential. Typical things noted are: i) FORKED — bifurcation of branches or trunks that often occur at a narrow angle. ii) INCLUDED BARK —a pattern of development at branch or trunk junctions where bark is turned inward rather than pushed out. This can be a serious structural defect in a tree that can and often does lead to failure of one or more of the branches or trunks especially during severe adverse weather conditions. iii) EPICORMIC GROWTH —this is generally seen as dense thick growth near the trunk of a tree. Although this looks like a healthy condition, it is in fact the opposite. Trees with Epicormic Growth have used their reserve stores of energy in a last ditch effort to produce enough additional photosynthetic surface area to produce more sugars, starches and carbohydrates to support the continued growth of the tree. Generally speaking, when conifers in the Pacific Northwest exhibit heavy amounts of Epicormic Growth, they are not Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 8of10 producing enough food to support their current mass and are already in serious dec line. iv) INTERNAL STRUCTURAL WEAKNESS —a physical characteristic of the tree trunk, such as a kink, crack, rot pocket, or rot column that predisposes the tree trunk to failure at the point of greatest weakness. v) BOWED —a gradual curve of the trunk. This can indicate an Internal Structural Weakness or an overall weak tree. It can also indicate slow movement of soils or historic damage of the tree that has been corrected by the curved growth. vi) KINKED —a sharp angle in the tree trunk that indicates that the normal growth pattern is disrupted. Generally this means that the internal fibers and annual rings are weaker than straight trunks and prone to failure, especially in adverse weather conditions. vii) GROUND FLOWER —an area of deformed bark near the base of a tree trunk that indicates long -term root rot. 9) ROOT COLLAR —This is the area where the trunk enters the soil and the buttress roots flare out away from the trunk into the soil. It is here that signs of rot, decay, insect infestation, fungal or bacterial infection are noted. NAD stands for No Apparent Defects. 10) Roots —Any abnormalities such as girdling roots, roots that wrap around the tree itself that strangle the cambium layer and kill the tree, are noted here. 11) COMMENTS —This is the area to note any additional information that would not fit in the previous boxes or attributes about the tree that have bearing on the health and structure of the tree. 12) CURRENT HEALTH ASSESSMENT —A description of the tree's general health rating from dead, poor, suppressed, fair, good, to excellent. 13) RECOMMENDATION —This is an estimate of whether or not the tree is off sufficient health, vigor, and structure that it is worth consideration of retention. NOTE: TREES WITH THE SAME DESCRIPTION AND DIFFERENT RATINGS: Two trees may have the same descriptions in the matrix boxes, one may be marked "Significant," while another may be marked "Non- Significant." The difference is in the degree of the description; early "necrosis" versus advanced "necrosis" for instance. Again, these descriptions were left brief in an effort to include as much pertinent information as possible, to make the report manageable, and, not to bore the reader with infinite levels of detail. Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT 3, REFERENCES CONSULTED: 1. Harris, Richard W. et al, Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1999. 2. Mattheck, Claus Prof. and Ass. Jur Mrs. Helge Breloer, The Body Language of Trees, A Handbook for Failure Analysis, HMSO, London, England. 1994. 3. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Evaluation of Hazard Trees, Second Edition, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1994 4. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Trees & Development, A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1998. 5. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., A New Tree Biology, Facts, Photos, and Philosophies on Trees and Their Problems and Proper Care. Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, New Hampshire. 1993. 6. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., Modern Arboriculture, A Systems Approach to the Care of Trees and Their Associates, Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, NH. 1991. 7. Watson, Dr. Gary W., & Dr. Dan Neely Editors, Trees & Building Sites, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, IL. 1995. Cascade Park Tukwila June 12, 2003 Gilles Consulting Page 10 of 10 June 4, 2001 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Ms. Marsha Tersigni 3465 South 144th Street, Apt. 205 Seattle, Washington 98168 RE: Cascade View Park S. 144th St. and 37th Avenue S. SEPA Determination (E01 -004) Dear Ms. Tersigni: Thank you for your May 15th letter regarding a pedestrian- operated crossing light at South 144th Street. Traffic safety is a high priority for the City of Tukwila. As you know, the City will be installing curb, gutter and sidewalk along the west side of 37th Avenue South and the south side of South 142nd. Full street improvements (including curb, gutter, sidewalks, drainage, street lighting and undergrounding of utilities) will be installed on South 144th from Tukwila International Boulevard to Military Road. Pedestrian safety will be evaluated as part of the design process for the proposed street improvements. In particular, the need for a pedestrian- activated signal in the vicinity of Cascade View Park will be evaluated. This will involve at least one meeting with property owners and residents along the affected streets. The construction of these improvements is scheduled to begin in 2002. If you should have additional questions regarding the design process or the timing of the street improvements, please contact Brian Shelton, City Engineer, at 206 -433 -0179. Sincerely, Steve Lancaster Director Community Development cc: Steven Mullet, Mayor Tukwila City Council Brian Shelton, City Engineer Bruce Fletcher, Parks Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMO DCD Director PW Director May 22, 2001 Cascade View Park Crossing Light @ S. 144th Traffic safety is a high priority for the City of Tukwila. The City's plans along with the new park include curb, gutter and sidewalk on the park side of 37th Avenue South and South 142"' Street and full street improvements, including curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage, streeflighting, and undergrounding of overhead utilities on South 144th Street from Tukwila International Boulevard to Military Road. The design of any street improvements necessitates evaluating traffic safety, including pedestrians, for the entire length of the project. The need for a pedestrian actuated signal in the vicinity of the park will be evaluated during design of South 144th Street. The project design process will include at least one meeting with property owners and residents along the affected streets. These improvements are scheduled to begin construction in 2002. TO: Brian Shelton FROM: Deb Ritter DATE: May 18, 2001 RE: MEMORANDUM SEPA Comment Crossing Light at S. 144th Cascade View Park A SEPA Determination of Non - Significance was issued on May 10th for this project. Steve Lancaster must respond to all letters that are submitted during the 14 -day comment period (which runs from May 10th to May 24th). The attached letter from Marsha Tersigni focuses on pedestrian safety and the fact that the park proposal does not include a crossing Tight at South 144th. She has sent copies of her letter to the Mayor and City Council. Please provide me with a memo describing what steps Public Works will take to evaluate the need for a pedestrian operated crossing light. Steve will incorporate your response into his reply to Ms. Tersigni. We would appreciate your memo by May 21st if possible. We anticipate that Ms. Tersigni will attend the public hearing on May 24th. cc: Bruce Fletcher Jim Morrow Jack Pace Michael Cusick MAY 1 7 2001 colviAulArrY DEVELOPMENT • • Steve Lancaster, Director Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Cascade View Park Dear Mr. Lancaster and Council Members: Marsha Tersigni 3465 S. 144th Street, Apt. 205 Seattle, WA 98168 May 15, 2001 Tukwila City Council 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 I appreciate receiving a copy of Planner Deborah Ritter's May 7, 2001 memorandum and schematic regarding the SEPA - determination for Cascade View Park:- The- general-layout of the park, with its - recent revisions, sounds and looks pretty good, and I am pleased that care will be taken to preserve existing trees and to keep lighting from disturbing the park's neighbors. In my letter of March 7, 2001 to the Department and the Council, I expressed concerns about safety, noise, and crime in regard to the park. Although my concerns about noise and crime are still not completely allayed, what troubles me greatly is the absence of any mention in the above - referenced memorandum about installing a crossing light for the children who are old enough to walk to the park by themselves (as well as elders, parents with baby carriages, the physically or mentally challenged, and anyone else lacking the split- second timing needed to cross a busy street without a light). In my letter I urged the installation of a pedestrian- operated crossing light at the logical place — between the north and south sides of 144th Street S. at the southern boundary of the park. Now, some people may say that those who live to the west of the park on the south side of 144th can simply walk down to Tukwila Int'1 Blvd. and cross safely there, but to expect that is not only unreasonable, it is unrealistic. No one, and especially no child, is going to continue past the park and walk a block east to the Boulevard, cross 144th at the existing light, and then walk another block back to reach the park — they're going to try to cross the street as soon as they're opposite the park. I sincerely hope this will not be a case of waiting for a child (or an elder or a baby carriage) to be hit by a bus, truck, or car to galvanize the installation of a crossing light. If the park can be afforded, so can the light. And I am sure we agree that people's lives are more important than any anticipated inconvenience to traffic. I do hope the City of Tukwila's Department of Community Development, Council, and Mayor's Office will do the responsible thing and expedite the addition to the park plans of a pedestrian- operated crossing light across 144th Street S. at the southern boundary of the Cascade View Park. I look forward to receiving further updates. Sincerely, Marsha Tersigni cc: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor, City of Tukwila Deborah Ritter, Planner, Dept. of Community Development Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, L,ES L /, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: C,�s(`AC6 VIEW Mg-1( Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: 4.2— ,i • Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /0774 day of HIT in the year 20 0/ P:GINAWYNETTA /FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM Project Name: C,�s(`AC6 VIEW Mg-1( Project Number: EQ / -601-/ Mailer's Signature: 4.2— ,i • Person requesting mailing: De C3 P:GINAWYNETTA /FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM CH IST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE POT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE Vt e 5 &P,A Eoi _ ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV ]y((DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* O FFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD O FIRE DISTRICT #11 • () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY (') QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY ()HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. () CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE >4.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT _•( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE • ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL &)(64CL- 7/21/00 \ \TUK2 \VOL2 \PL • \I NING \administrativeforms \FORMS \CHKLIST.doc MEDIA ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () HIGHLINE TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send these documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made.at the.hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General * Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send these documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) 02/05/01 P:\PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS.doc ADDITIONAL ADDRESSES FOR CASCADE VIEW PARK PUBLIC NOTICE E01 -004 AND L01 -016 Ms. Marsha Tersigni 3465 South 144th Street, Apt. 205 Seattle, Washington 98168 Ms. Cynthia Griffin 3434 South 144th Street, Apt. 335 Tukwila, Washington 98168 Merlen & Kathleen Graf 14153 37th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 Ms. Ellen Prindiville 14203 35th Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NON'SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP A 2 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK "CASCADE VIEW PARK". PROPONENT: CITY OF TUKWILA _PARKS. L EP - -T LOCATION OF PROPOSAL,. ADDRESS: PARCEL NO 5EC /TWN /RNG: LEAD AGENCY;. CITY- OF TU}.WILA INCL1JDING STREET ADDRE: S*IF ANY 14325 37 AV .S. 152304 -9179 SW 1'5-23 -4 FILE NO: EOrt004 The City,has•determined tlTa�'�ihe prop sal does no-t‘ have a• 00bable i yn i t 1 'ant. adver_.& i mpatt` on tithe environment. An enV:1 ronmenta 1 impact' :tate_ment (EIS) .As- not i�eo'u- -iced under' RCW 4. ':21c.030(2) (c) . This de"t:is� ion was made ,'after review�o' a completed environmental chec6 :1 ist and other info r_mat ion,, on t l e.- ..with the 1 ead' agency. This information is available, to. the'uub`1ic,�on re;ouest. • k• k• k• k• k*• k• k• k• k• k.• k• k• k• k• k.• k: k, k: k• k• k• k.• k• k• k*• k *•k•k•k•k:k•k•k:L•kkk "kkk•k" •k•k•kkk•k•k•k•k *•k•k•k•k•k•k : k•k"k "#•k•k•k:4•.•kk•k : k This determination is final and ;,signed ,this ." day of 2001_. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila. (206) 4.1- 3670 6300 'Southce.nter`Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for EPA �ippea l _. are ava i l•abl;e ` with the Department of Common i;tv Development-, • city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Deborah Ritter Date: May 7, 2001 Re: MEMORANDUM E01 -004 (SEPA Determination) Cascade View Park South 144th St. & 37th Avenue South Project Description: This SEPA review is in connection with the construction of a two -acre neighborhood park to be known as Cascade View Park, located at the northwest corner of South 144th Street and 37th Avenue South. Proposed features for this "passive" park include picnic tables, benches, a gazebo and children's play area. An entry plaza will contain permanent art work and planters. Informal lawn areas and ornamental planting beds will be bordered by walking paths that are handicapped accessible. During the comment period three letters were received. Areas of concern focused on noise, pedestrian - traffic conflicts and crime. These issues are discussed in the following sections of this memo: Plants, Environmental Health, Transportation and Public Services. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None. Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The site was previously developed and contains seven single - family homes and three additional vacant parcels. The site slopes in an easterly direction with slopes varying from 5% to 10 %. Soils are assumed to be glacial till based on 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 E01 -004 (SEPA Determination Cascade View Park May 7, 2001 Page 2 geotechnical reports for improvements to Tukwila International Boulevard (1998) and the removal of an underground oil tank at the South City Motel (2000). The amount of fill materials will be minimal and will be used to fill in basement and foundation areas previously occupied by single - family homes. Imported materials will come from an approved off -site barrow pit. At park completion less than 25% of the site will be impervious. A City- approved temporary erosion control plan will be in place prior to grading and construction. • Air Dust and exhaust emissions will be generated during construction, with watering as necessary to control dust. • Water There are no water bodies on, or in the vicinity of, the site. The source of runoff to the site is seasonal rainfall. Storm water runoff generated by the project will be collected and conveyed by a series of existing and proposed catch basins and tightlines to the existing storm drain system. The temporary erosion control plan will be designed to meet the standards of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. • Plants The health of all existing significant trees on the site will be evaluated. Where possible, healthy significant trees will be retained and incorporated into the park design. Existing residential ground cover and shrubs will be removed prior to grading. The landscape plan for the park has not been completed at this time, however it is anticipated that a variety of low maintenance, drought tolerant trees, shrubs and groundcovers will be used. Plantings will be designed to allow adequate sight lines throughout the park and in accordance with recommendations regarding crime prevention. • Animals Songbirds and rodents have been observed. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a migration path for various waterfowl. E01 -004 (SEPA Determinatio, Cascade View Park May 7, 2001 Page 3 • • Energy /Natural Resources Electric power will be used for site lighting. Environmental Health Noise generated by construction equipment will occur on a short-term basis. The hours of construction will comply with the City's noise ordinance. Users of the park may generate varying levels of noise and will also be subject to the City's noise ordinance. The site design will place activities and landscaping in a manner that will buffer or reduce noise impacts. The site contains seven single - family homes, constructed at various times between the 1940's and 1960's. The seven homes have been purchased by the City. Four of the seven homes were found to contain traces of asbestos which will be removed in accordance with Washington State Labor and Industries requirements. After the asbestos has been properly removed, the seven houses will be relocated or demolished. • Land /Shoreline Use The project is bounded on the north by South 142nd Place, on the east by 37th Avenue South and on the south by South 144th Street. The site is located in the Medium Density Residential zoning district which allows parks as a permitted use. Apartment complexes are located to the east (across 37th Avenue South), to the south (across South 144th) and along the project's west property line. All of these apartment complexes are zoned High Density Residential. Commercial properties are located to the east (True Value Hardware) and south (Larry's market) and are zoned Neighborhood Commercial Center. Single family homes are located to the north, across South 142nd Place and are zoned Low Density Residential. Tukwila International Boulevard is one block east of the project site. • Housing The site contains seven single - family homes. These homes were constructed at various times between the 1940's and 1960's. The seven homes have been purchased by the City and will be removed and /or demolished to create the park site. E01 -004 (SEPA Determinati1 Cascade View Park May 7, 2001 Page 4 • Aesthetics The park design is being developed in coordination with the residents in this neighborhood. Significant healthy trees will be incorporated into the park design, where possible. Park elements will be placed to provide adequate separation of uses and safety. Community projects such as permanent public art and a pea patch have also been proposed for the park. • Light and Glare Site lighting will be provided by new "no glare" light standards. Any illumination, including security lighting, shall be directed away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. • Recreation According to the first review draft of Tukwila's "Park, Golf and Public Places Plan 2000 - 2005" dated April 21, 2000, the Cascade View Neighborhood is the "most obvious area that does not meet the city's standard for access to a neighborhood park." According to that plan, Cascade View Park is ranked first in priority for proposed park projects. Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. Transportation The project is bounded on the north by South 142nd Place, on the east by 37th Avenue South and on the south by South 144th Street. Tukwila International Boulevard is located one block to the east. To increase pedestrian safety for children, landscaping will be used to buffer and separate activities within the park from those around the park. Children's play equipment will be buffered by landscape plantings and located away from the street. Metro transit route #128 runs along South 144th Street. The project will eliminate 7 ( +1 -) parking spaces with the removal of the residential structures. Based on the City's concurrency ordinance, the park is not expected to cause a negative impact on the existing level of service. E01 -004 (SEPA Determination Cascade View Park May 7, 2001 Page 5 Due to site limitations, no on site parking will be provided. However, six off -site parking spaces are proposed for the west side of 37th Avenue (the eastern boundary of the park). Per TMC 18.56.050 and 18.104.010(E), the required number of parking spaces for the park must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission during a public hearing (tentatively scheduled for May 24, 2001). • Public Services Additional police and fire services may be required, depending upon the future demand levels generated by the park. This may include monitoring for crime or vandalism. • Utilities Project will not increase demand on the utility systems. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance. 42nd CASCADE VIEW PARK. 1Y2001 Conceptual Design Revised May 7, 2001 'ERA RAISED PARDEN AREA! SWING BUFFER P L.4.NTING PLAZA AREA • PICYIC LULL'S - GAZE.HO / TPLELLLS • SOCIAL SPACES CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA LANDSCAPING - ORY,udENTAL G.A.R.DENS APARTMENTS SCALE IN FEEr 0 20 90 91f OPEN LAWN ?LAY .� FDIC PARKING I I PARALLEIl P RKING S PACES MEWALK NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SC-{ENI‘iT TC DESIGN • 5/!/01 SCMEME 'D' 144th PARK ENTRY PLALk FCCAL POC.7 - PUNTE-3., SIGH — ._. ... -. De • ora Ritter - Casca• a View Par Page 1 From: Bruce Fletcher To: Deborah.6300- po.tuk -mail Date: 5/7/01 4:50PM Subject: Cascade View Park I have approved the revised Cascade View Park conceptual design dated May 7, 2001. Bruce Fletcher City of Tiakwg Steven M. Mullet, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Department MEMORANDUM Deborah Ritter, Assistant Planner Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation May 2, 2001 Cascade View Park Bruce Fletcher, Director ECEWWE MAY 03 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Cascade View neighborhood park project has developed a finalized conceptual park design. A brief background of how we arrived at this point is as follows: • The Cascade View Park has been on the CIP for the past decade. • The Cascade View Park is the number one priority need in the Parks Commission goals and Six -Year Parks, Golf and Public Places Plan. • Several community meetings have taken place regarding the park (one City Council public meeting, one City Council parks plan public hearing, three Parks Commission public meetings and several Community and Parks Committee meetings). • The Cascade View Park "phone line" was created to give our residents updated information and also another opportunity to voice concerns or ask questions. • City staff with representation from all departments participated in the Cascade View "all -city project team" to discuss park concepts, design and construction. • Outreach to receive public input came from several city mailings, articles in the city newsletter (Hazelnut), flyers, announcements, signs and cascade view phone line. With the support from city staff, the Parks Commission and the Tukwila City Council, the next step was to hear from the public. At the first City Council public meeting on June 15, 2000, the message was loud and clear — we need a park! The comments that came from this meeting included: make it a first class park; choose a location close to the apartments; make it a safe place for children and seniors; playground equipment with open space and trails; upgrade Cascade View Elementary ball field; and, keep criminals and drug users away from the new park. From this meeting, the city staff took the collected comments to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee on July 15, 2000. The committee approved a park concept. The Mayor directed city staff to proceed and purchase land for park development. The Parks Commission facilitated three park design meetings.' The first was held at Cascade View Elementary School on March 14, 2001. A first draft conceptual park design was introduced and the comments from this meeting included: move the swings and play equipment away from the street; make sure this is a neighborhood park and limit parking; no public restrooms (port-a -potty ok); design the park to be safe; make the park a community project, including a garden and public art; include a low fence around the The Center of YOUR Community 12424 42nd Ave. S. ° Tukwila, Washington 98168 ° Phone: 206-768-2822 ° Fax: 206 - 768 -0524 Memorandum — Deb Ritter • Page 2 play equipment; sidewalks needed; many traffic concerns, including adding stop signs; traffic lights and cross walks; and, make sure the park has security lighting. The next meeting was held at the Cascade View Park site at 14211 37th Ave South on March 28, 2001. The city staff developed three new conceptual park designs from the resident input from the previous meeting. The meeting comments included: do not have parking on 142 "d° no bushes to conceal drug use; move "green house" to plot L or off the park site; leave house for art or resource center; need security cameras; do not need cameras; have a neighborhood watch; demolish houses before school is out; put parking on 137th; have Bocci ball, sani can, pea patch garden; add fountain or wading pool; need side walks; add a stop light at 144th and 37th; include an international theme; and, limit parking (2 or 4 hours). The final meeting was also held at the park site on May 1, 2001. With public information collected, the city staff introduced the updated Cascade View Park conceptual design. Comments included; add a drop off zone for kids and seniors; need barbecue area and tables; make house a historic museum; busy street — need 3 -way stop signs on 142' and 37th Ave South now; add a quality bathroom structure; and, vandalism and crime concerns with enclosed bathroom. All participants were given a park survey (see enclosed for results). The final conceptual park design calls for a passive park with amenities that include: park entry plaza with art and planters; walking trail; children's play equipment; picnic tables and benches; gazebo; open play lawn; park lighting; and, buffering plants and landscaping. Half- street improvements are scheduled and six parking stalls (one handicapped) are recommended. The Parks and Recreation Department has collected valuable information from our concerned residents, elected officials and city staff. We have made every effort to proceed by including the community to develop and construct a park that will best fit the needs for the Cascade View neighborhood. We will continue to dedicate our efforts to add another quality park for the City of Tukwila. BF Attachment Cascade View Park May 1, 2001 Public Meeting -- Survey Results Please indicate in the boxes below, what you believe about each of the following statements. Strongly Agree Slightly Agree Slightly Disagree Strongly Disagree I believe that the park should be designed for resident's and park users' safety. 14 2 1 0 I believe that 6 parking stalls are adequate for this park. 7 8 2 0 I believe that parking should have a time restriction. 13 3 1 I believe that as many of the existing large trees should remain in the park. 12 3 1 1 I believe that a picnic area should be included in the park. 13 1 3 I believe that play equipment should be included in the park. 14 1 1 0 I believe that an informal grass play area should be included in the park. 14 1 1 0 14 2 0 0 I believe that a three way stop should be added at 142nd and 37th Ave. I believe that pedestrian assistance (cross walks or pedestrian signal) should be added at 144th and 37th. 15 2 0 0 Other Comments: Concerned about drugs, drinking, etc.; small reservation area for picnics; need restrooms locked at dusk, 3 -way stop at 37th and 142, well marked cross walks, no BBQ, money from "green" house go back into park; loading zone, no cameras, real bathrooms, need BBQ, use end lot for pea patch, lots of picnic tables, foutain, spray area for kids, 15 to 20 mph zone around park; more picnic tables, portable toilet needed; like music in the park idea; BBQ needed, good restroom needed; flashing red light at 37th and 142; traffic light at 37th and 142; glad to have a nice park, parking should be restricted, thank you; security cameras in off hours, add cross walk at 37 and 144; need a basketball court. Put your name and phone number in the corresponding box(s) below. Name Phone I am interested in being on the PLAY EQUIPMENT committee. I am interested in being on the RAISED FLOWER BEDS committee. I am interested in being on the ART IN OUR PARK committee. Dept. Of Community Development City. of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF, DISTRIBUTION I, Qa c c�e._. S,cocory HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number : ® 1 -- no `( 5e.. SD-e, 6 anii)2i 13(1 )1,-d 1- OI Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature: -(j_tz--■ e, Notice of Public Meeting Person requesting mailing: O Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ — FAX To Seattle Times • Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of Par, in the year 20 o ( P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM Project Name :l' CA4—(k °� J 31t \ Qa �( ' �cS CD-�Q a (- 1-men� Project Number : ® 1 -- no `( 5e.. SD-e, 6 anii)2i 13(1 )1,-d 1- OI `) Mailer's Signature: -(j_tz--■ e, Person requesting mailing: O P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM The following Development APPLICANT: LOCATION: • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED MARCH 23, 2001 application has been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community for review and decision. City of Tukwila, Parks Department Northwest corner of South 144th Street and 37th Avenue South, Tukwila. The park will be bordered by South 142nd Place on the north, by 37th Avenue South on the east, by South 144th Street on the south and by the Samara Apartments on the west. FILE NUMBERS: E01 -004 (SEPA Determination) L01 -016 (Special Permission — Parking) PROPOSAL: Create a two acre neighborhood park to be known as Cascade View Park. Proposed park features include picnic tables, benches, a gazebo and a children's play area. Informal lawn areas and ornamental planting beds will be bordered by walking paths that are handicapped accessible. OTHER REQUIRED Building permit for any structures over 120 s.f. in area and PERMITS: for any retaining walls over 4 feet in height. These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT The Tukwila Parks Department is sponsoring a neighborhood meeting to obtain input regarding the proposed project. The meeting will be held at 14211 37th Avenue South on Wednesday March 28, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please contact the Parks Department at 206 - 767 -2342. You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on April 6, 2001. If you have questions about this proposal contact Deborah Ritter, the Planner in charge of this file at (206) 431 -3663. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 142nd CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA 0 SCALE IN FEET 25 Cc 1CfQT I-0 4- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 50 WALKING PATH•: 100 PLAY LAWN SIDEWALK SCHEMATIC DESIGN PARCELS A -1 ?PAYS etc 9-# 'M a P zzinnENT 144th REC 1VED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER PARK ENTRY PLAZA - FOCAL POINT - PLANTER / SIGN - COMMUNITY ART State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E-mail: tukplanaci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I M,€A /( C,674.4 -(PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on '3 - 2..-g - 0 / the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104..110 and the other ,applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 5, i q� d-' 3` Ail..e, J1 so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way p nary vehicular access to the property for application file number60l _ QQ4f J-- LQ( - Q (., I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to rem sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner o Notice letter. On this day personally appeared before me I Applicant or P'oject Manager's Signature iately dispose of the days of a to me known to .e the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged th•, she signed the same )' er voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this o4O` da ofJ� , c0 •V .- r q� •• +�..,g�0'v •• .° My commission expires on S-- (k -'62 WAs "'..i u,,,,„."' .. NOT PUBLIC in and for the S residing at to of Washington Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:12 AM To: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 5outhcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Dear Sir or Madam: From: Kathy Graf, R.'y V) I � COMMUSIT DEVELOPvit Page: 1 of '1 We are writing to you in reference to the Notice of Application, Parks Department for the proposed park to be known as the Cascade View Park. We have been very excited about this proposed park. However, upon receiving a copy of the notice with the design outlay of the park, we became concerned. We own and operate a dog and cat grooming shop in Burien. When searching for a place to lease, one of our needs for the space was that the location be set back f'om the street. Dogs, like children, have a tendency to dart out into streets, traffic etc. Since I have opened two years ago, there has been more than one instance where unleashed dogs have run around the parking lot, and had our space not have been set back from the street, I an sure there may have been some accidents. At my previous job, they had a dca dart out into the street Tess than a month ago, get hit by a car and die. What does this have to do with the park? Well, according to the diagram, the children's swings and play area is located close to the street, not only one street. but also an intersection. I think it seems logical and safer that the children's play area and swings are set farther into the park. We own the house across the street at 14153 - 37th. and in the past two years, our fence has been smashed into at least twice from careless motorists. One of these incidents was reported to police, the other not reported. It seems to make more sense to have the picnic tables or seating for parents to be outside the play area, as sort of a buffer from the street. Lastly, if the park goes ahead as diagrammed here, we feel that we would worry about the safety of the children. Instead of a peaceful park across the street from our home, we would have children running close to or in the street. Thank you, Merlen Graf Kathleen Graf March 9, 2001 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 • RE: Notice of Application, Dated March 5, 2001 Proposal: Cascade View Park Location: NW Corner of S. 144th Street and 37th Avenue S., Tukwila Gentlemen: I'm happy that the City of Tukwila is planning neighborhood improvements by creating parks. This is especially advantages to the children who live in various apartment complexes in the neighborhood. My only concern is that in situations with other neighborhood parks, drug dealing tends to occur in or around these areas. I hope that the City of Tukwila will set a curfew for this new park and will have regular police patrols to monitor any illegal activity. I have lived in the Tukwila area for over 20 years and am glad to see these neighborhood improvements developing. Thank you. Sincerely, cec� Cynthia Griffin The Samara Apartments 3434 S. 144th St., Apt. 335 Tukwila, WA 98168 RECEIVED - MAR 13 2001 DEVELOPMENT Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd.,. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Proposed Cascade View Park • Marsha Tersigni 3465 S. 144th Street, Apt. 205 Seattle, WA 98168 March 7, 2001 Tukwila City Council 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 I think it would be basically wonderful for the children of this neighborhood to finally have a decent place to play, and for the adults, especially the elders, to have a pleasant place to enjoy the out -of -doors and to socialize. However; I do have some concerns —and recommendations to address those concerns. The first concern is one of safety. The south side, and main entrance, of the proposed park abuts on a dangerously busy street and corner. This is the point where many children who live to the south of 144th Street would likely try to cross the street to reach the park. I believe it is essential, if the park is to be built on the proposed site, that a traffic light be installed at the intersection. of S. 144th Street and 37th Avenue S. This could be a "crossing" light that stops traffic only when a "walk button" is pressed by a pedestrian. The park would be no blessing if children were harmed trying to reach it. In the sane regard, I think it would be wise to fence off the park along 144th Street and at least partway up the 37th Avenue side to prevent children from running out into traffic in the excitement of play (there could be no guarantee they would stay in the less hazardous, "official" children's area to the north). The second concern is one of noise. Along with about 50 other families, I live in the Colonial Garden apartments directly south of the proposed park site. We have already experienced how the sharp, shrill sound of barking dogs from Lots A and B (on the proposed site schematic) carries across the street and straight into our courtyard, where it is amplified and echoes in a way more distressing than all the surrounding sirens, boom boxes, and airplanes put together. If people were engaged in sports activities on the proposed "play lawn" (Lots A through E), the inevitable screaming and yelling would focus into our courtyard and be even more disturbing than the yowling dogs —and for prolonged periods of time. I believe this could at least be mitigated by a deep, high buffer planted solidly all along the south side of the proposed park. Finally, I am concerned about the very real possibility that a park in this high- density, major- traffic- corridor location would be a magnet after dark for unruly groups of adolescents —and worse. The only remedy I can think of for that, short of all -night police foot - patrols, would be to fence and gate the entire park and lock it at dusk. Thank you for your attention to my concerns and recommendations. I look forward to hearing about further developments in the consideration, and the form, of the proposed Cascade View Park. Very truly yours, ati.P,t Marsha Tersigni RECEIVED MAR 12 2001 DEVaELOPMENT Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION i, Cori Clark HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: E02-001-/ 3 L01- 01(0 Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: �- *44' Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping . Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit — _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 5"4' day of 1%a✓Ch i n the year 20 b/ . P:GINAWYNETI'A/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM Project Name':rzCaSCa.dc V'e,w Pack Project Number: E02-001-/ 3 L01- 01(0 Mailer's Signature: Olti QA.^% Person requesting mailing: �- *44' P:GINAWYNETI'A/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 02/09/012:17 PM 1 City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of f Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED MARCH 5, 2001 The following application has been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: City of Tukwila, Parks Department LOCATION: Northwest corner of South 144th Street and 37th Avenue South, Tukwila. The park will be bordered by South 142nd Place on the north, by 37th Avenue South on the east, by South 144th Street on the south and by the Samara Apartments on the west. FILE NUMBERS: E01 -004 (SEPA Determination) L01 -016 (Special Permission — Parking) PROPOSAL: Create a two acre neighborhood park to be known as Cascade View Park. Proposed park features include picnic tables, benches, a gazebo and a children's play area. Informal lawn areas and ornamental planting beds will be bordered by walking paths that are handicapped accessible. OTHER REQUIRED Building permit for any structures over 120 s.f. in area and PERMITS: for any retaining walls over 4 feet in height. These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT The Tukwila Parks Department is sponsoring two neighborhood meetings to obtain input regarding the proposed project. The meetings will be held at Cascade View Elementary School on Wednesday March 14, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. and on Wednesday March 28, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. If you have any questions regarding these meetings,, please contact the Parks Department at 206 - 767 -2342. You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on March 19, 2001. If you have questions about this proposal contact Deborah Ritter, the Planner in charge of this file at (206) 431 -3663. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • 142nd CHILDRENS PLAY AREA i•- 110*. 0 SCALE IN FEET 25 50 100 WALKING PAT PLAY;IAWN RECEIV D CITY OF TU <WILA • A ^n;',1 SIDEWALK COI1/41C_EF row NEIGHBORHOOD PARK SCHEMATIC DESIGN PARCELS A - 1-08 -0� LbM Qtp znnLk) T 144th PERMIT CENTER C/1 m PARK. ENTRY PLAZA - FOCAL POINT - PLANTER / SIGN - COMMUNrrY ART State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(iki.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I Michael P. Cusick, P.E. (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on 3 — S — 0 1 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at s , N yt rl 5A- 4- 31i1A A e, so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file numbers X01 _ ��. 0/- Dl (o I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and im sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or wit Notice letter. ose of the 14) days of a App cant or Project Manager's '_ nature On this day personally appeared before me I' ; 0.0-Sk to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2,./4. day of 6/41.{v,N_ , c2co <A1C, r►Jk NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on (�(� • cry of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor February 27, 2001 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Bruce Fletcher Director Parks & Recreation Department City of Tukwila 12424 42nd Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION RE: Cascade View Park South 144th Street & 37th Avenue South, Tukwila E01 -004 (SEPA) L01 -016 (Special Permission — Parking) Dear Bruce: Your applications for a SEPA determination and Special Permission - Parking have been found to be complete as of February 27, 2001 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Essentially, this means that you have supplied the required items listed on the. application checklists for these types of permits. We have provided Mike Cusick in the Public Works Department with a laminated copy of the Notice of Application for posting on the notice board on the site. The Notice will be posted on March 5, 2001 and the public will have until March 19, 2001 to provide us with written comments. We are about to commence our technical review process, which is the next phase in the processing of your SEPA and Special Permission applications. Although these applications have been found to be "complete ", the items you supplied may have to be revised or amended. The City may also require that you submit additional plans and information to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City and to finalize the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, 0{-e Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner cc: Mike Cusick, Public Works Tom Pulford, Public Works Mike Alderson, Fire Department Bob Abbott, Police 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 'SO N • • 3 j89 /4 Z°./ :3t J � v r • BEY / Fog LE 4-L DL--5C2 i'i /o//S Z050,o t9.99 zoo Zo5 zoo c.1 N O /03 'n w .'t ° 1 • lc' c /03 M • /73 ,99D�Q olti 5f �1 /73 975 y» 0 0 0 w RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 5 2601 IZ `EII1 CE ER r---- ,0.25 1 ,Zs w b Of L 6° C� I D° 2 °t 773 !73 J $ (Prrsc R7 S. 142ND PL. 7 -Z7•St 1/a. oz/T.) (s./4ZND ,r.) 4,0 N.✓ /LO Ji j 20/ 1• ., .004' -. 4I ii 1 _ /IO /0(,1_3 N35-JZ7 -44 p 91-0 S1 1 0 • „ • I ZO! • w /0f. /7 i0 /•/s .. 61 iM .0, is /Lo �iq3 ✓ ▪ ICJ re N .3 /5: 10 4 7 9= u5 J,1 /36.09 406.x.44 o, 2. 4ZS 4Z .JI •s /4.03 - /0 ' /AO J 4 /4O 30 zs zs 1326.22 •" DuNG�J BO im, rAtt) f 19'175. /-1.-/ 7-1-1 S N 87- 35 - 33 This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further STATE OF WASHINGTON • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan cr ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 37th Ave South & S 144th Street for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at I (•lkw t `� (city), W A (state), on 2 - H - 01 Bruce Fletcher (Print Name) 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 (Address) 206 - 767 -2343 (Phone Number)/. (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me 130/ C.E 'FLerCi1Tt-t`-p - to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /sttesigned the same as his/l f" voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON T l; ZG /`T D • 0 �'.r.'� J� NOTARY residing at in and My Commission expires on state �V2- 20 / gton COMP ETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted in a later timely manner for use at the Public Hearing (e.g., revised colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED, TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431- 3670pjipent of Community Development and 206 - 433 -0179 Department of Public Works. CITY OF TUKWILA COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE FEB 1 5 2001 Information Required. Maybe waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning Information Waived PbWk/ Ping f- Gf'iMil i LGId 1 W u Office Use Only . Comments & Conditions. APPLICATION FORMS: 1. Application Checklist: one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Four (4) copies of supporting studies with original signatures and license stamp as needed. 3. Complete Application Packet: Six (6) copies of application form and full sized plans, one set of all plans reduced to 8.5" by 11" (High Quality Photo Reduction) and other materials and information as specifically listed in Project Description and Analysis, Site Plans, Landscape Plan and Elevations. 4. SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) and fee ($325). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 5. King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject lot. X SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. 6. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. See Public Notice Materials. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks must be included). X SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. A 4' x 4' Public Notice Board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. PROPERTY INFORMATION 7. Vicinity Map with site location. X 8. Surrounding Land Use Map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 foot radius from the lot's property lines. X 9. Title Report -- Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances. X 10. Lot lines for 300 ft. from the site's property lines including right -of -ways. X P:VCATHLEEN\SEPAAPP.DOC, 07/14/01 • 1 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431- 3665CITY OF TUKWILA E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FEB 1 5 2001. PERMIT CE APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P- SEPA Planner: b -R4 !� File Number: E OI _ 00 Li Application Complete (Date: 2- 21.01) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: LO1 _ c to NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: CASCADE VIEW PARK LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. SEE ATTACHED MAP. Parcels. 1523at -9119, °►Oq5 \°►OVI ,G11$(o ,91-18, �flg5 °1i %7 22 4,9 302 c(r & 303 Quarter: SW Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Bruce Fletcher Address: 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206 - 433 -1838 4 //' ` Signature: -/rf PA KATHLEEN 02/14/01 FAX: 206 - 433 -1833 Date: 2 fLf`cII • STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cascade View Park 2. Name of Applicant: Tukwila Parks Department/Tukwila Public Works 3. Date checklist prepared: February, 2001 Agency Comments RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 5 2 PERMIT CENTER 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): May 1, 2001 for demolition and August 15, 2001 for the construction of the park. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The existing homes will be demolished and the site will be stabilized with an erosion control plan using Best Management Practices as outlined in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. With the homes demolished the site will be developed into a neighborhood park. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. GA APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 02/14/01 1 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA determination, demolition, land altering, hauling, street use and house moving 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed project will involve the moving or demoliton of eight single family residences (2.13AC) and the construction of a neighborhood park. The existing City of Tukwila zoning for the parcels is medium density residential (MDR). The properties abutting the site to the east are zoned Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) and High Density Residential (HDR). To the south the zoning is HDRI and NCC. To the north and west the zoning is HDR and Low Density Residential (LDR). The various boundaries of the site have different physical conditions. The east boundary is 37th Ave South, which is asphalt pavement with no curb and gutters. On the north is S 142nd Place which is asphalt pavement with no curbs and gutters. On the south is S 144th Street which is asphalt pavement with no curb and gutters. To the west is the Samara Apartment Complex. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. See attached legal and vicinity maps. The project is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of South 144th Street and 37th Ave South. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No G: \APPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 02/14/01 2 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The site slopes from South 144th Street toward the North to South 141st Street down from South 132nd Street. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% to 10 %. Agency Comments c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil maps of the site are not available. Soils are assumed to be glacial till, based on the geotechnical report for Tukwila International Blvd (SR 99) roadway improvements dated July 6, 1998 by HWA GeoSciences, Inc, and the report for the removal of the under ground oil tank at the south City Motel by Adapt Engineering, dated 1/13/2000. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill quantities are available at this time. The imported materials will be minimal and limited to topsoil to fill in existing foundations and basements removed during demolition. Imported materials will come from an approved off site barrow pit. G: \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion of soils could occur during demolition, grading and clearing is near steeper portions of the site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? With the construction of the park, less than 25% of the site will be impervious. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Follow Best Management Practices according to a Temporary Erosion Control Plan that will be approved by the City prior to construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During demolition and grading, we anticipate vehicle and equipment exhaust and minor dust generation during dry weather grading. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. G: v ,PPHAN\LANDUSE.APP'SEPAAPP.DOC, 02/14/01 4 • 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Comply with vehicle emissions standard and Best Management Practices during project grading. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. N/A 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, site elevations are above the flood plain. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Current sub soils may not percolate well. Minimal surface water from the site will enter the ground water. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, OI/25/01 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: The existing_ homes were previously served by sanitary sewer and septic tanks. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff to the site is seasonal rainfall. Storm water runoff generated by the proposed project will be collected and conveyed by a series of existing and proposed catch basins and tightlines to the existing storm drain system. The existing catch basins will be protected with fabric filter fence to prevent sediment from entering the existing storm drainage system. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Based on the existing storm drain collection system, no waste materials can enter the ground. The temporary erosion control plan will be designed to meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The site will utilize the existing storm drainage system to collect the site runoff during demolition. One -half street improvements may be constructed along the street frontages. The improvements will include catch basins and storm drain per the requirement of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. G: \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing ground cover and shrubs will be removed and the site graded for use as a park. Significant trees will remain as part of the park. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site plan for the park is being developed at this time. The plantings have not been determined at this time. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 8 Agency Comments Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen other ) Evergreen tree: f c edar ine, they rubs) Gras Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing ground cover and shrubs will be removed and the site graded for use as a park. Significant trees will remain as part of the park. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site plan for the park is being developed at this time. The plantings have not been determined at this time. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 8 Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, o Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: oue b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No — Other than Pacific Flyway, which covers much of Western Washington. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric power will be used for site lighting. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 9 Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/A c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. At this time the City of Tukwila knows of no environmental health hazards with this site. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None — Normal fire, police and aid care services could be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 10 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Noise from airplanes and traffic. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise will occur from vehicles, equipment and tools. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ' Conform to best construction practices during construction and comply to noise levels specified by ordinance. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing City of Tukwila zoning for the parcels being developed is medium density residential (MDR). The properties abutting the site to the east are zoned Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) and High Density Residential (HDR). To the south the zoning is HDRI and NCC. To the north and west the zoning is HDR and Low Density Residential (LDR). The various boundaries of the site have different physical conditions. The east boundary is 37th Ave South, which is asphalt pavement with no curb and gutters. On the north is S 142nd Place which is asphalt pavement with no curbs and gutters. On the south is S 144th Street which is asphalt pavement with no curb and gutters. The the west is the Samara Apartment Complex. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in recent time. G: WPPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 11 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments C. Describe any structures on the site. The project site contains seven single family homes and three vacant parcels. The homes were constructed in the 1940's to 1960's. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Up to nine single family homes will be demolished to make way for the new park. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Medium Density Residential (MDR). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Medium Density Residential (MDR). g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. None. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 12 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? The City of Tukwila purchased these sites as vacant. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Comply with good design practices and zoning requirements. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A G: WPPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 13 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 25' for street lighting poles. Other than picnic shelters, no habitable buildings are being proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 14 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal site lighting will be provided for security of the park at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foster High School Field, Showalter School Field and South Central Pool. G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 02/14/01 15 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The park will provide the area recreation opportunities without crossing Tukwila International Blvd. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N /A. G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Tukwila International Blvd., S 144th Street, S 142nd Street, and 37th Ave South. Access to the park will be provided by on- street parking along the west side of 37th Ave South. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is serviced by King County Metro bus route #128, which runs along S 144th Street. C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The City may provide 10 -15 on street parking stalls along 37th Ave South. The project will eliminate 6 +/- on site parking places with the demolition of the existing houses. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project may provide public half street improvements along the parks frontage of existing Right -of -Way. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No special transportation needs are anticipated. G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 17 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Comply with ordinance requirements and mitigation requirements. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 18 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The City will provide a drinking fountain for the park project along with a service connection to the existing sanitary sewer. The site is currently serviced by Water District #125 and the Val -Vue Sewer District. City Light will provide power to the project for site lighting. The City of Tukwila will install storm drainage improvements along the frontage of the project per the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Date Submitted: i - i-j- O( (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). G AAPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 01/25/01 19 :.S1ON 0, urn t.t!. ouzo, 245A DE Li/ /-'4e(L kJ 'ES REM! CITY OF TU •ILA FEB 1 5 2301 PERMIT CE R • February 12, 2001 PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 14337 37TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 24, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the - City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized Tight microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Thirteen (13) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14337 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page 2 of 3 SAMPLE # 40229.000 -01 40229.000 -02 40229.000 -03 40229.000 -04 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 40229.000 -09 40229.000 -10 40229.000 -11 40229.000 -12 40229.000 -13 MATERIAL Popcorn ceiling texture Popcorn ceiling texture Gyp wallboard /joint compound Gyp wallboard /joint compound Sheet flooring (ivory) /mastic Sheet flooring (ivory) Sheet flooring (gray) Sink undercoating Foam pellet insulation Asphalt comp shingle (brown) Asphalt comp shingle (It. brown) Asphalt comp shingle (black) Asphalt plies w /silver paint Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Bedroom Living Room NW Bedroom Living Room Bathroom Kitchen (over plywood) Kitchen (under plywood) Kitchen Attic (under fiberglass batt) Roof (top layer) Roof (middle layer) Roof (bottom layer) Garage Roof Analytical Result NAD NAD Joint comp = 2% Chrysotile Composite = <1% <1% Chrysotile NAD NAD 3% Chrysotile 3% Chrysotile NAD NAD NAD NAD Silver paint = NAD Asphalt plies = 2% Chrysotile Asbestos - Recommended Actions: The joint compound found on the walls in the bedroom tested positive for asbestos, however, no asbestos was found in the gypsum wallboard. The composite of the gypsum wallboard and the joint compound is considered to be Tess than 1% asbestos and may be treated as a non- asbestos- containing material. Although the material is not considered an asbestos - containing material, contractors performing renovation or demolition work should be notified of the presence of asbestos in the gypsum wallboard and joint compound. The wallboard debris should be wetted during demolition and respirators should be worn. The original asbestos - containing layer of flooring found in the kitchen is sandwiched between the original plywood substrate and a newer layer of plywood with a top layer of non - asbestos sheet flooring. To expedite the removal of the lower layer of ACM flooring, the plywood substrates and sheet flooring could be removed as an integral unit and disposed of intact by an abatement contractor. There is approximately 160 square feet of asbestos - containing flooring in the kitchen. The asbestos found in the kitchen sink undercoating was used for sound dampening. The sink can be removed as an integral unit and disposed intact as ACM. The asphalt plies covering the garage roof tested positive for asbestos, however, the silver paint tested negative. Built -up roofing abatement is considered by Washington Department of Labor and Industries to be a Class II removal operation, which includes asbestos - containing built -up layers, felt underlayment, intact cements, coatings, and mastics. The manual removal of intact (non - friable) roofing materials is not considered an asbestos project. However, demolition contractor personnel conducting built -up roofing removal must have asbestos awareness training and have an asbestos certified supervisor onsite. The material must be removed using manual methods and must not be sanded, abraded, or ground. Material that has been removed from a roof must not be dropped or thrown to the ground and must be removed by the end of the work shift. Manual removal methods of intact built -up roofing materials include, but are not limited to, the use of spud bars, shovels, Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14337 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page3of3 spades, and utility knives to slice, cut, and pry-off the material. The material must be disposed of as non - friable asbestos - containing roofing and transported as such to a proper disposal facility. There is approximately 270 square feet of asbestos - containing asphalt roofing on the garage. Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jet-z.ez-,-• Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses Project: PBS zsr -17 "277-1-4Q GeAA2. Analysis requested: Relinq'd by /Signature: Received by /Signature: Please Fax results to: 206/762 -4780 Attn: Adam Draper Brian Stanford Dennis Sasse Gregg Middaugh TURN AROUND TIME: o 1 Hour o 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours ❑ Gwen McCullough Harry Goren ❑ Jerry Bennett ❑ Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours ❑ 48 Hours aI- �9H Project #:49'2-25 Oa Date: f ji24f) Date/Time: //2-5P11 D2'16)i lr Date/Time: ❑ Sheila Hetterscheid p Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pettingill ❑ Yeana Kim ❑ Other: ' 3 -5 Days ' ❑ Other Lab# 59,x.1 Sample # Material \ Location Lab 402.29•oo •e>1 —02 6?), T2- 5c7;3 -oy 55'02 11 5V5' -o4 59 ;G _Jyo7 % 5t c2 & g/., Gd Z �3f .� c (4;f' v, , s” G -0 5 � � �" � Y--\1-- 2,cA,7ezv - to 5933- 51 33 — 1 CI-4/ /a-- cv .et /e114 •.) ( ti & '3 ,44 , ,e6/ /iL rz NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk .Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14337 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00794.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015921 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: White soft lumpy material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Calcareous matrix, Synthetic foam PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015922 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: White soft lumpy material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Calcareous matrix, Synthetic foam PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015923 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky_ material LAYER 4: Tan compacted powdery material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 45% LAYER 4: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix LAYER 4: Calcareous matrix PERCENT ND ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%=5-15%, 20%40-30%, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14337 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00794.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 (Lab ID #: 21015923 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 results continued from previous page) LAYER 3: *None Detected ND LAYER 4: Chrysotile 2% Sample comments: Composite result is less than 1% of asbestos for whole sample Lab ID #: 21015924 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material LAYER 4: Trace tan compacted powdery material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected I.AYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Cellulose 45% LAYER 3: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix LAYER 4: *None Detected LAYER 4: Calcareous matrix ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND LAYER 4: Chrysotile <1% Lab ID #: 21015925 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. 'Description: LAYER 1: tiVhite vinyl LAYER 2: Grey fibrous backing with mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Cellulose 55 %, Glass fibers 5% LAYER 2: Fine particles, Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Note: if samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9%, 10 %= 5-15%, 20 %= 10 -30%, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14337 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00794.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015926 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: White vinyl OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected Vinyl /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015927 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -07 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Tan vinyl with mastic LAYER 2: Grey tile LAYER 3: Tan vinyl with black asphaltic fibrous hacking OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 45% ASBESTO S LAYER 1: LAYER 2: LAYER 3: TYPE: *None Detected Chrysotile *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder, Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Asphalt /binder, Calcareous matrix PERCENT ND 3% ND Lab ID #: 21015928 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: Black asphaltic mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT Chrysotile 3% (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 . Date: 02/02/2001 ►!� �� echnica lr• • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate . • •migirles are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %'>1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14337 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00794.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015929 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: White foamy material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Synthetic foam, Fine particles PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015930 Client Sample #: 40229.0040 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: Black asphaltic material with mineral grains OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 5 %, Glass fibers 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder, Mineral /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015931 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -11. Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: Black asphaltic material with mineral grains OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 5 %, Glass fibers 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON-FIBROUS ?�•IATE.RIALS: Asphalt /binder, Mineral /binder PER CENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed y Date: 02/02/2001 1 %i�iir��■ wed by: Nick L a e: Nickl �a or Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk-smile; are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % = >0 -3 %, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30%,' 50%=40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14337 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00794.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015932 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -12 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: Multi- layered black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 5% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015933 Client Sample #: 40229.0043 Sample Location: 14337 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Silver paint LAYER 2: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: "None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 15% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: Chrysotile 2% Sample comments: Asbestos found in asphaltic patches at bottom of sample Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate y. All btltksainples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1- 9%,10 % = 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30%, 50%=40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 .PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L February 12, 2001 Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 14331 37TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 24, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Twelve (12) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14331 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page 2of2 SAMPLE # MATERIAL 40229.000 -01 40229.000 -02 40229.000 -03 40229.000 -04 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 40229.000 -09 40229.000 -10 40229.000 -11 40229.000 -12 Gyp wallboard /joint compound Gyp wallboard /joint compound Popcorn ceiling texture Sheet flooring (ivory) /mastic Sheet flooring (ivory) /mastic Sheet flooring /black mastic Mastic (yellow) Insulation Blown -in insulation Asphalt comp shingle (brown) Asphalt comp shingle (green) Asphalt shingle (red- brown) /paper Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Kitchen Hallway Family Room Bathroom (2 layers) Kitchen (over plywood) Kitchen (under plywood) Bathroom tub surround Family Room exterior wall Attic (under fiberglass batt) Roof (top layer) Roof (middle layer) Roof (bottom layer) Roofing paper Analytical Result NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD Asbestos - Recommended Actions: No asbestos was found in any of the building materials sampled. The house had been in the process of a partial interior renovation at the time of the inspection, however, all sample locations reflect building materials of the original construction. Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses ?!C1 Analysis requested: Relinq'd by /Signature: Received by /Signature: Please Fax results to: 206/762 -4780 is PBS Attn: ❑ Adam Draper ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Dennis Sasse ❑ Gregg Middaugh TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours Gwen McCullough Harry Goren Jerry Bennett Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours 0 48 Hours Project #: -oo 393 Date: 1 Date/Time: 1 if i. 6950 Date/Time: /42 7o /a. '3S/ D''? ❑ Sheila Hetterscheid ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pettingill ❑ Yeana Kim ❑ Other. 3 -5 Days Other Lab tt 590 5y to Sample # Material Location Lab 401.29. oo - c) &-'€ 5 1/ 59/3 5/y 55 as f -b2 P1,.J�1� -� u _a 2Z71/i//,'t/- 3 — 7 )4_)-r 'v new. — G ��.(i�.a -ty 14.k-f ,wdr� - D thrww /may "��'wC/ k 1' 1— -a3 rr — 1b C v c, .111.1. wry) 1 ♦`-°rilr- C ''r c9 C 7 ot,„-br4tret) ts S AMAstersk.Office111111 3(FlATA cok PBS ENVIRONMENTAL 220 SOUTH FINDLAY, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9110$, (206)-233 -9639, FAX (206)462 -4710 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental- Seattle Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14331- 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number. 21- 00793.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples:12 Lab ID #: 21015909 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: White compacted powdery material with white paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with white & tan paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 65% NON-FIBRO LIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous matrix, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015910 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: White compacted powdery material with white paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with white & tan paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 3% LAYER 2: Cellulose 60% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous matrix, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum/binder PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015911 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. 5. Description: LAYER 1: White soft foamy lumpy material, LAYER 2: Tan fibrous material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 100% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous matrix, Synthetic roam LAYER 2: *None detected PERCENT Sampled by: Client OP` Analyzed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 N .:� • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed samples are analyzed using EPA 600/R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported To Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30%, 50 %40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental- Seattle 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14331 - 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00793.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015912 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Ivory sheet vinyl, LAYER 2: Off -white fibrous felt backing with beige mastic, LAYER 3: Cream sheet vinyl, LAYER 4: Off -white fibrous felt backing with beige mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 35 %, Glass fibers 5° /% LAYER 3: *None Detected LAYER 4: Cellulose 40 %, Glass fibers 7% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Mastic /binder LAYER 3: Vinyl /binder LAYER 4: Binder & filler, Mastic /binder PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND ND ND ND LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected LAYER 4: *None Detected Lab ID #: 21015913 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Ivory. sheet vinyl, LAYER 2: Off -white fibrous felt backing with beige mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 30 %, Glass fibers 5%, Synthetic fiber 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Mastic /binder PERCENT ND ND Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client 1 Analyzed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001�._�� Y� Reviewed by: Nick L,y Date: 02/02/2001 .t �iV7 - . -!ctor i Note: 11 samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. • • samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental- Seattle 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14331 - 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00793.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 Lab ID #: 21015914 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Off -white vinyl tile, LAYER 2: Clear adhesive, LAYER 3: Tan linoleum, LAYER 4: Black asphaltic fibrous material and mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 5% LAYER 3: Cellulose 5% LAYER 4: Cellulose 75% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected LAYER 4: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder, Mineral grains LAYER 2: Adhesive /binder LAYER 3: Linoleum /binder LAYER 4: Asphalt /binder, Mastic /binder PERCENT ND ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21015915 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -07 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Yellow mastic, LAYER 2: Tan paper coated with pink paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 70% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Paint.. ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate y. 1! • ' . sJamples are analyzed using EPA • 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5%=>1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20 %= 10 -30%, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested.. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page ► ' �echnica ertor 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental- Seattle Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number. 21- 00793.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples:12 Lab ID #: 21015916. Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: Gray loose -fill fibrous material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 100% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None detected ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015917 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Gray loose - fibrous material, 1.AYER 2: Gray & pale yellow loose -fill fibrous material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 100% LAYER 2: Glass fibers 98% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None detected LAYER 2: Glass shots & debris ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015918 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -10 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: Black asphaltic material v: ith brown & beige granules OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Glass fibers 12% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder, Granules ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Nick Ly Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%=5 -15%, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental- Seattle 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14331 - 37th Ave. S. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00793.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples:12 Lab ID #: 21015919 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -11 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: Black asphaltic material with green & white granules OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 18 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder, Granules PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015920 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -12 Sample Location: 14331 - 37th Ave. S. Description: LAYER 1: Black asphaltic material with brown & red granules, LAYER 2: Black asphaltic paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 18 %, Synthetic fiber 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 35 %, Synthetic fiber 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder, Granules LAYER 2: Asphalt /hinder PERCENT ND ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Nick Ly Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 -ctor J Note: if samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separa a y. •1 "':'samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0 -3 %, 5 % =>1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20%= 10 -30%, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L February 12, 2001 Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 14319 37TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 25, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (AGMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Twelve (12) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 • • Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14319 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page 2 of 2 SAMPLE # 40229.000 -01 40229.000 -02 40229.000 -03 40229.000 -04 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 40229.000 -09 40229.000 -10 40229.000 -11 40229.000 -12 MATERIAL Mortar Wallboard /ceiling board 12 -inch floor tile /mastic 12 -inch floor tile /mastic 9 -inch floor tile /black mastic 9 -inch floor tile /black mastic Sheet flooring (ivory) /mastic Sheet flooring mastic Cove base mastic Asphalt comp shingle (green- white) Asphalt comp shingle (It. green) Asphalt shingle (reddish) Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Living Room wall Kitchen Living Room Kitchen (top layer) Kitchen (bottom layer) Bedroom Bathroom Bathroom tub wall Kitchen Roof (top layer) Roof (middle layer) Roof (bottom layer) Analytical Result NAD NAD Tile = <1% Chrysotile Mastic = NAD Tile = NAD Mastic = 3% Chrysotile Tile = 10% Chrysotile Mastic = NAD Tile = <1% Chrysotile Mastic = NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD Asbestos - Recommended Actions: The living floor and bedroom floor tiles tested positive for a trace of asbestos. Although the mastic tested negative, a similar mastic found in the kitchen tested positive. The kitchen has multiple layers of floor tiles, of which a combination of the tiles and mastic tested positive for asbestos. The bottom layer of mastic in the kitchen tested negative for asbestos. All of the tile layers and associated mastic in the living room, kitchen, and bedroom should be removed as an integral unit and disposed of intact by an abatement contractor. There is approximately a total of 375 square feet of asbestos - containing flooring and mastic found in the residence. Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses al°) ass Project: 14---t71). '7'1 aim Analysis requested: Relinq'd by /Signature: • Received by /Signatu Please Fkif'resu Attn: ❑ Adam Draper Brian Stanford Dennis Sasse Gregg Middaugh : 206/762 -4780 TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours Lab #. 5� Sample K 41,2tq.0a • o I ▪ aS --Q3 .5F( / -04 O '1 Seto 5 589 O ❑ a - 007i/ Project #:412.'2-- - 00 Date: L )-7-c72o } Date/Time: 1/16/42-1 Iz. >4 Date/Time: //c 6 /O/ ()L'L) / /70 33 Gwen McCullough Harry Goren Jerry Bennett Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours 48 Hours Material ❑ Sheila Hctterschcid ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pettingill ❑ Yeana Kim ❑ Other: 3 -5 Days ❑ Other I.ocatioa Lab tiont,r � t'./ �e_ 1 a&- G Tom+ • Z iA L 2 G/7 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14319 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00791.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 Lab ID #: 21015887 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: Off -white granular compound OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mineral grains, Perlite, Binder /filler PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015888 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: Compressed brown fibrous material with multiple layers of paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 95% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015889 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Brittle beige vinyl, LAYER 2: Gummy black /clear mastic, DYER 3: Gray crumbly compound OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: 'None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 3% LAYER 3: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: Chrysotile LAYER 2: *None Detected NON- FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder, Fine particles, Adhesive /binder LAYER 3: Fine particles, Resin /binder PERCENT <1% ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1%=>0-3%, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14319 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00791.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 (Lab ID #: 21015889 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 results continued from previous page) LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Sample comments: TEM analysis recommended for Layer 1. Lab ID #: 21015890 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Brittle off -white vinyl, LAYER 2: Soft brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON- FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Adhesivc /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Chrysotile ND 39 Lab ID #: 21015891 Client Sample #:. 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Brittle brown vinyl, LAYER 2: Gummy black mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 1% NON-FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Vinyl /hinder LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder, Fine particles ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: Chrysotile 10% LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Lab ratory Director ■ Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 1 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted To Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2. NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk .Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14319 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00791.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 Lab ID #: 21015892 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft gray vinyl with white and black streaks, LAYER 2: Gummy black mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 1: Fine particles, Polymeric binder LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder, Fine particles ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: Chrysotile <1% LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sample comments: TEM analysis of Layer 1 recommended. Lab ID #: 21015893 Client Sample #: -.40229.00707 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft white vinyl, LAYER 2: Gummy tan mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Synthetic foam, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Adhesive /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: "None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015894 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft white and gray pattern vinyl, LAYER 2: Gummy tan mastic OTHER FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 10% NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Synthetic foam, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Adhesive /binder (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf an, La orato tre for Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3%, 5%=>1-9%, 10 0= 5-15 %, 2070= 10 -30 %, 50 %=40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14319 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00791.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015895 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09. Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: Brittle black mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Resin/ binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015896 Client Sample #: 40229.0040 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: Black fibrous asphaltic material with green and white mineral cap OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Glass fiber 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt/ hinder, Mineral grains PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015897 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -11 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Black fibrous asphaltic material with gray mineral cap, LAYER 2: Black fibrous asphaltic material with green mineral cap OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Glass fiber 15% LAYER 2: Glass fiber 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder, iviineral grains LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder, Mineral grains PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 a-e Munaf Man, Laboratory Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14319 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number. 21- 00791.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 12 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND. LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015898 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -12 Sample Location: 14319 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Black fibrous asphaltic material with gray mineral cap, LAYER 2: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 35 %, Hair 3% LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder, Mineral grains LAYER 2: Cellulose 55 %, Hair 1% LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in Rill, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, La 'oratory Director PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L February 12, 2001 Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 14325 37TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 24, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized Tight microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Ten (10) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14325 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page2of3 SAMPLE # MATERIAL 40229.000 -01 Gyp wallboard /joint compound 40229.000 -02 Gyp wallboard /joint compound 40229.000 -03 Sheet flooring layers /mastic 40229.000 -04 Sheet flooring layers /mastic 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 40229.000 -09 40229.000 -10 Cove base mastic Sheet flooring wainscot/mastic Ceiling tile Blown -in insulation Asphalt comp shingle (green) Asphalt comp shingle (It. green) Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Kitchen NW Bedroom Bathroom Kitchen (multiple layers) Kitchen Laundry Room SW Room Attic Roof (top layer) Roof (bottom layer) Analytical Result Joint comp = 2% Chrysotile Composite = <1% Joint comp = 2% Chrysotile Composite = <1% Sheet flooring = NAD Bottom layer felt w /mastic = 45% Chrysotile Multiple layers of felt backing w /mastic = 45% and 50% Chrysotile Mastic = NAD Joint comp = 2% Chrysotile Felt backing only = 45% Chrysotile NAD NAD NAD NAD Asbestos - Recommended Actions: The joint compound found on the walls in the kitchen and bedroom (assumed to be throughout) tested positive for asbestos, however, no asbestos was found in the gypsum wallboard. The composite of the gypsum wallboard and the joint compound is considered to be Tess than 1% asbestos and may be treated as a non - asbestos - containing material. Although the material is not considered an asbestos - containing material, contractors performing renovation or demolition work should be notified of the presence of asbestos in the gypsum wallboard and joint compound. The wallboard debris should be wetted during demolition and respirators should be worn. The bottom layer of sheet vinyl flooring (felt backing with mastic) found in the bathroom tested positive for asbestos. The layer is effectively encapsulated by the non - asbestos top layer of sheet flooring. Both layers of sheet flooring should be removed as an integral unit and disposed of intact by an abatement contractor. There is approximately 30 square feet of asbestos - containing flooring found in the bathroom. The top two out of three layers of sheet vinyl flooring (felt backing) and mastic found in the kitchen tested positive for asbestos. The bottom layer of mastic over plywood tested negative. All layers of sheet vinyl should be removed as an integral unit and disposed of intact by an abatement contractor. There is approximately 170 square feet of asbestos - containing flooring found in the kitchen. The felt backing of the sheet flooring used as a wainscot in the laundry room tested positive for asbestos; however the mastic was negative. There is approximately 40 square feet of wainscot. • Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14325 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page3of3 Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses afar Project: • PBS _ a, -�79a • 141Z� Analysis requested: 1 Relinq'd by /Signature: Received by /Signatu e: Please F results 'o: 206/762 -4780 Attn: ❑ Adam Draper ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Dennis Sasse ❑ Gregg Middaugh TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours ❑ Gwen McCullough Harry Goren ❑ Jerry Bennett ❑ Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours 48 Hours Project #: 40'222i. v7 Date: Date/Time: 1 1--* /p l 051a Date/Time: /426 / 1-7 VD o Sheila Hettcrschcid ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pcttingill o Yeana Kim ❑ Other 3 -5 Days Other I Lsb # 58'99 5100 6- 90/ Sample # Material Location Lab 1`p 21-1.0o - O 1 -02 - 03 5-gc 55o 3 - 04 —0'5 —oz 51c6 ,-90 7 -o$ 590 Fr 09 (0 Nw C(2- fe„t- ten. ( */ /,,� 1- Ctstrt- ,.M td0.4,:vetot.> (:5 A-fri a4 f2 ' a c' feyv(r- - -ft /7 t. opqr, - NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 14325 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number. 21- 00792.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 10 Lab ID #: 21015899 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Off -white crumbly compound with multiple layers of paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with felt OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 10% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: Chrysotile LAYER 2: *None Detected Sample comments: As a composite, sample contains <1% Asbestos. NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous filler /binder, Mica, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum /binder PERCENT 2% ND Lab ID #: 21015900 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Off -white crumbly compound with multiple lavers of paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with felt OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 10% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: Chrysolite LAYER 2: *None Detected Sample comments: As a composite, sample contains <1% Asbestos. NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous filler /binder, Mica, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum /hinder PERCENT • 2 % ND Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Carol Evans Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14325 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00792.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 10 Lab ID #: 21015901 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft white vinyl, LAYER 2: Gray fibrous backing, LAYER 3: Gummy tan mastic, LAYER 4: Soft off -white vinyl, LAYER 5: Gray fibrous, mastic - soaked backing OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 30% LAYER 3: Cellulose 1% LAYER 4: *None Detected LAYER 5: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected LAYER 4: *None Detected LAYER 5: Chrysotile NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Synthetic foam, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder /filler LAYER 3: Adhesive /binder LAYER 4: Fine particles, Vinyl /binder LAYER 5: Binder /filler, Adhesive /binder PERCENT ND ND ND ND 45% Lab ID #: 21015902 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft brown vinyl, LAYER 2: Gray fibrous, mastic - soaked backing, LAYER 3: Soft white and tan vinyl, LAYER 4: Gray fibrous, mastic - soaked backing, LAYER 5: Soft brown vinyl, LAYER 6: Black fibrous asphaltic backing, LAYER 7: Brittle tan mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: 'None Detected LAYER 2: 'None Detected LAYER 3: 'None Detected LAYER 4: *None Detected LAYER 3: Cellulose 5% LAYER 6: Cellulose 50 %, Hair 3% LAYER 7: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Chrysotile NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Synthetic foam, Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder /filler, Adhesive /binder LAYER 3: Synthetic foam, Vinyl /binder LAYER 4: Binder /filler, Adhesive /binder LAYER 5: Vinyl /binder LAYER 6: Asphalt /binder LAYER 7: Resin /binder, Fine particles PERCENT ND 50% (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory Direc or Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600/R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %=10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited . by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14325 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00792.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 10 (Lab ID #: 21015902 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 results continued from previous page) LAYER 3: *None Detected ND LAYER 4: Chrysotile 45% LAYER 5: *None Detected ND LAYER 6: *None Detected ND LAYER 7: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015903 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft brown mastic, LAYER 2: White crumbly compound with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Chrysotile NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Resin /binder, Fine particles LAYER 2: Calcareous filler /binder, Mica, Paint PERCENT ND 2 °/0 Lab ID #: 21015904 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Soft red vinyl, LAYER 2: Cray fibrous hacking, LAYER 3: Brittle brown mastic, LAYER 4: White chalky material with felt OTHER FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected LAYER 4: Cellulose 60% ASBESTOS LAYER 1: LAYER 2: LAYER 3: TYPE: *None Detected Chrysotile *None Detected NON- FIBROUS :1-1ATERIA LS: LAYER 1: Synthetic foam, Vinyl/binder LAYER 2: Binder /filler LAYER 3: Resin/ binder LAYER 4: Gypsum /minder PERCENT ND 45% ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the insults is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14325 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00792.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 10 (Lab ID #: 21015904 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 results continued from previous page) LAYER 4: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015905 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -07 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: Brown fibrous board with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 80% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Resin /binder, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015906 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: Gray fibrous material OTHER FIBROLTS MATERIALS: Mineral wool 85% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Glass beads PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015907 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Black fibrous asphaltic material with green mineral cap, LAYER 2: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 40 %, Synthetic fiber 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 55 %, Synthetic fiber 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder, Mineral grains LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %=>0 -3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50°')= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14325 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00792.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 10 (Lab ID #: 21015907 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09 results continued from previous page) LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015908 Client Sample #: 40229.0040 Sample Location: 14325 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: Black fibrous asphaltic material with green and white mineral cap, LAYER 2: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 40% LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder, Mineral grains LAYER 2: Cellulose 55% LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 NA �rri�► Munaf Khan, Laboratory rector Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1%= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %0, 50 %=40 -60% ). This report relates only-to to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the ample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 • • PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L February 12, 2001 Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 1 ct= "i 1+0v RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 14211 37TH AVENUE SOUTH, TUKWILA, WA. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 25, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Eight (8) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 14211 37th Avenue S., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page 2 of 2 SAMPLE # 40229.000 -01 40229.000 -02 40229.000 -03 40229.000 -04 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 • MATERIAL Gyp wallboard /joint compound Sprayed -on wall texture Mosaic tile floor grout Gyp wallboard /joint compound Mosaic floor grout/concrete Asphalt comp shingle (green) Asphalt roofing paper Window putty Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Living exterior wall Living Room Back door Hallway (2nd floor) Bathroom (2nd floor) Roof (over porch) Roof (main house) Living Room • Asbestos - Recommended Actions: No asbestos was found in any of the building materials sampled. Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses Analytical Result NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD c? /a/ Project: PBS Analysis requested: Relinq'd by /Signature: Received) y /Si Please Fax result to: 206/762 -4780 Attn: ❑ O O Adam Draper Brian Stanford Dennis Sasse Gregg Middaugh TURN AROUND TIME: O 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours O 4 Hours ❑ Gwen McCullough Harry Gorcn Jerry Bennett O Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours 0 48 Hours Project #:'4222-., tab Date: 1' Date/Time: j Date/ Time: //c (0 .07/451 ecy=eD /09. 351Pi71 ❑ Sheila Hctterscheid ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pettingill ❑ Yeana Kim ❑ Other. 3 -5 Days Other Lab# ss ?y Sample Material Location Lab 5o .- v2 58t/ 03 sss-a 58-83 538-44 581-6 0 4 liZzte< iNriktiC .1-1F,tt/ L- w NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14211 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00790.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 8 Lab ID #: 21015879 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: White crumbly compound with yellow paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with brown felt OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 50% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS LAYER 1: Calcareous filler /binder, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015880 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: White textured paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose <1% NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Calcareous filler /binder, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015881 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: White granular compound, LAYER 2: Gray cementitious material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Binder /filler LAYER 2: Mineral grains, Cement /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory y r Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %) This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited . by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 .. NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 14211 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number: 21- 00790.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 8 Lab ID #: 21015882 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: White crumbly compound with white paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with brown felt OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 20% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous filler /binder, Paint LAYER 2: Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015883 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: LAYER 1: White granular compound, LAYER 2: Gray cementitious material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected • NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Binder /filler LAYER 2: Mineral grains, Cement /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015884 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S asphaltic material, LAYER 3: Black asphaltic fibrous material, multiple layers of similar composition NON- FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mineral grains, Asphalt /binder LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder, Fine particles LAYER 3: Asphalt /binder PERCENT Description: LAYER 1: Black asphaltic fibrous material with mineral cap, 2 layers of similar composition, LAYER 2: Gummy black OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Glass fiber 15% LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: Glass fiber 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory irecto Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3%, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only t� the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 S. Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goreri Project: 14211 37th Ave S NVL Batch Number. 21- 00790.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 8 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015885 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -07 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 55% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015886 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 14211 37th Ave S Description: White rubbery sealant with dark gray surface OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: 'None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Rubber /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Carol Evans Reviewed by: Munaf Khan Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 Munaf Khan, Laboratory y r Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reprted % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5%= >1-9%, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30%, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. page 3 PBS E N V I R O N M E N T A L February 12, 2001 Mr. Michael Cusick City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ASBESTOS SURVEY FOR THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 3507 SOUTH 142ND STREET, TUKWILA, WA.. LETTER OF "GOOD FAITH INSPECTION ", PBS PROJECT #40229.000 PBS Environmental performed an asbestos survey of the property referenced above on January 25, 2001. The purpose of the survey was to determine the presence of asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) in the residence prior to a proposed demolition. The intent of this letter is to ensure that the City of Tukwila is in compliance with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries' requirement that a "good faith inspection" for asbestos - containing materials be performed prior to demolition activities. ASBESTOS - CONTAINING MATERIALS Suspect ACMs were sampled by AHERA accredited Building Inspector Harry Goren (cert. # 995730). All accessible spaces were inspected for suspect ACMs. Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of one percent asbestos by volume. Suspect asbestos - containing materials were sampled with single use containers to avoid cross - contamination. Samples were assigned a unique identification number. Thirteen (13) bulk samples were collected and delivered for analysis to NVL Laboratories, Inc. located in Seattle, Washington using chain -of- custody protocol. Laboratory analyses are attached to this report. Results of the laboratory analyses are as follows: ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 206/233 -9639 Fax 206/762 -4780 Michael Cusick Asbestos Survey for 3507 South 142nd St., Tukwila February 12, 2001 Page 2of2 SAMPLE # 40229.000 -01 40229.000 -02 40229.000 -03 40229.000 -04 40229.000 -05 40229.000 -06 40229.000 -07 40229.000 -08 40229.000 -09 40229.000 -10 40229.000 -11 40229.000 -12 40229.000 -13 MATERIAL Gyp wallboard /joint compound Gyp wallboard /joint compound Plaster Ceramic tile mastic Laminate mastic Sheet flooring (ivory pebble) Sheet flooring (tan) /paper Laminate mastic Wall surfacing Asphalt comp shingle (gray) Asphalt comp shingle (dk. gray) Asphalt roofing paper Window putty Notes: NAD -No Asbestos Detected LOCATION Dining Room Kitchen SE Bedroom (ext wall) Bathroom Kitchen backsplash Bath Kitchen Kitchen countertop Living Room walls /ceiling Roof (top layer) Roof (middle layer) Roof (over plywood) Garage • Analytical Result Joint comp = <1 % Chrysotile Joint comp = 2% Chrysotile Composite = <1% NAD NAD NAD 45% Chrysotile (felt backing) NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD Asbestos - Recommended Actions: The joint compound found on the walls in the dining room and kitchen tested positive for asbestos, however, no asbestos was found in the gypsum wallboard. The composite of the gypsum wallboard and the joint compound is considered to be Tess than 1% asbestos and may be treated as a non - asbestos- containing material. Although the material is not considered an asbestos - containing material, contractors performing renovation or demolition work should be notified of the presence of asbestos in the gypsum wallboard and joint compound. The wallboard debris should be wetted during demolition and respirators should be worn. The felt backing of the sheet flooring found in the bathroom is encapsulated by the non - asbestos vinyl surface layer. No mastic was found in the sample analysis. The ACM shall be removed by an abatement contractor prior to demolition of the residence. There is approximately 25 square feet of asbestos flooring material in the bathroom. Please feel free to call me at (206) 233 -9639 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Harry Goren Environmental Planner AHERA #995730 Enclosures: Asbestos Laboratory Analyses aioI IIIIIII • a1_co?.S, PBS �� C� Project: .4:7 ` • 14-2 Project #402-2-7 • Pp Analysis requested: Date: 1/-0/2./ Relinq'd by /Signature: - . Received by /Signature: Please Fax results to: 206/762 -4780 Attn: ❑ Adam Draper p Brian Stanford ❑ Dennis Sasse ❑ Gregg Middaugh TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ - 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours. ❑ Gwen McCullough Harry Goren ❑ Jerry Bennett ❑ Margie Staulcup ❑ 24 Hours ❑ 48 Hours Date/Time: Date/Time: ( : //X %/ . 35/2 ❑ Sheila Hetterscheid ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Tod Pettingill ❑ Yeana Kim ❑ Other: 3 -5 Days ` ❑ Other Lab # J ?(o6 5�6 7 Sample # Material Location Lab 40 221.00- O j 1'`/0/1,1 G r d -02 6-w,, 6� .YT 5868- Q2 5g6 y = G4 C)''"�' -\-∎IQ sk7o o �,�- w,c,c- JG �7/ -a� �, ,.(rG2,C.� .) �µ `34-r 587A - 01 � 4 >W/ - /l /� L wa.�Q -4 5873 I r,u er.. os S: Mijtu V:XB BUUCDATA.FRM PBS ENVIRONMENTAL 220 SOUTH FINDLAY, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 951011, (206)-233-9639, FAX: (206 )-762.47$0 • • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 3507 S. 142nd St. NVL Batch Number. 21- 00789.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015866 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -01 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 35% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Chrysotile LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix PERCENT ND <1% ND Lab ID #: 21015867 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -02 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: LAYER 1: Peach paint LAYER 2: Tan compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: "None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 35% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Chrysotile LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix PERCENT ND 2.0/0 ND Sample compnents: Composite result for whole sample is less than 1% of asbestos. Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate . • • amples are analyzed using E1'A 600/R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported `Y° Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40- 60 %.). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page Ni AMP imair air. • 1 r • • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 3507 S. 142nd St. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00789.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples:13 Lab ID #: 21015868 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -03 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Grey granular /sandy material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Calcareous matrix, Sands ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015869 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -04 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROLIS MATERIALS: *None Detected Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015870 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -05 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: LAYER 1: Brown mastic LAYER 2: Grey granular /sandy material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% NON- FIBROLIS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix, Sands ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 Date: 02/02/2001 N. ctor Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate y. samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: PBS Environmental Address: 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Attn.: Mr. Harry Goren Project: 3507 S. 142nd St. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00789.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples:13 Lab ID #: 21015871 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -06 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: LAYER 1: Beige /green vinyl LAYER 2: Grey fibrous backing with mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Fine particles, Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: Chrysotile 45% Lab ID #: 21015872 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -07 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: LAYER 1: Beige vinyl with fibrous backing and mastic LAYER 2: Brown vinyl with black asphaltic fibrous backing OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 65% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder, Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21015873 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -08 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Brown brittle mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 �� /� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 N. � ' cal P e Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. Alrbulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10 %= 5-15 %, 2004= 10 -30%, 50 %= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 • • • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 3507 S. 142nd St. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00789.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015874 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -09 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: White /peach paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015875 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -10 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Black asphaltic material with mineral grains OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3 %, Glass fibers 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder, Mineral /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015876 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -11 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Black asphaltic material with mineral grains OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3 %, Glass fibers 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder, Mineral /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/2001 11/ III Nick "ZJif� '• -ctor Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 % = >1- 9%,10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 • • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: PBS Environmental 220 South Findlay Seattle, WA 98108 Mr. Harry Goren 3507 S. 142nd St. NVL Batch Number: 21- 00789.00 Client Project #: 40229.00 Number of samples: 13 Lab ID #: 21015877 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -12 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Black asphaltic fibrous felt OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 65% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21015878 Client Sample #: 40229.00 -13 Sample Location: 3507 S. 142nd St. Description: Grey brittle material with surface paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Calcareous matrix PERCENT ND Sampled by: Client 0.- Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 02/02/2001 i %�% //�� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 02/02/211 '��` or dliialaiMilli Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. Allen pies are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10%= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%.40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government Page 5 /'---'" ‘i. • AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: Clement F. Yuma Attorney at Law 4803 N. Market Street Spokane. Washington 99207 • SALE AGREEMENT • ..THIS .R EEMENT: made•and :entered.into this .. day or , 2000, • by and between bI.RDIE'.ANDERSON. and WILLIAM WEITENSTEINER and OTTO a estates, WEITENSTEINER and CARL WEITENSTEINER, each as their respective separate vendor(s), and DAVID FIELDMEYER, an unmarried individual, as purchaser(s) W I T N E S 5 E T H: agree to purchase of the vendor(s) upon That`ttie vendors agree to sell to the purchaser and the purchaser(s) g P State of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the following described real estate situate in KING County. Washington, to -wit: QUARTER OF SECTION 15, THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF MEERID �, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TOWN%HP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS Beginning r.: the intersection of the Northerly Line of the Southerly 20.00 feet or said subdivision with the Westerly Line of the Easterly 25.00 feet thereof; Thence Westerly parallel with the Southerly Une of said subdivision 1 40.00 feet: Thence Northerly parallel with the Easterly Une of said subdivision 70.00 feet: Thence Easterly parallel with the Southerly Line of said subdivision 140.00 feet to the Westerly Line of the Easterly 25.00 feet thereof: Thence Southerly along the Westerly Line 70.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. TAX ACCOU NUMBER: 152304-9185-00 .. THETOTAL PL RCH.ASE PRI.GE.• !hick. purdiaseF;agrees. to pay. to .vendor5 is::.. • $95,000.00, of which sum • ge vendors. $ 5,000.00 has been paid, receipt of which is hereby the kn wled d by, The balance of the - purchase price in month $90,000.00 purchaser agrees to pay to vendors in installments 0�$7�•�� or per be paid induding interest at 8% per annum on a declining balance, on or before the � day of 2001, and $750.00 or more on or before the day of each month thereafter until principaUdrt merest have v deferred n paid in full. Payments shall be applied first to interest. then to principal. balance•shall be computed from nt amount charged for each and every There shall be a late charge of 1 096 of le payment due date. payment that is paid 15 or more days SALE AGREE,t 11M• 721',1 t713E *17Z 90Z Page l.oj4 • 3QIS1Sti3 AJW323 TS :,ST T00z- b0 -Nllf Order No. 3119649 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 20.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 25.00IFEET THEREOF; U'i�iRLY LINE OF SAID THE THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL SUBDIVISION 140.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 70.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE;` NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 60.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 140.00 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 25.00 FEET THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 60.00 FEET; THENCE SUBDIVIWESTERLY ON, 40.000 PARALLEL TO THE TRUE SOUTHERLY NTOF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 t'Z d 078Z t717Z P' 90Z 3QIS.St3 X1w3N ZS:ST T00Z- b0 -Ndf TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMA" 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Prepared for: MARGE FREEMAN TR.ANSNATION TITLE - BURIEN 15500 1ST AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98148 Attn: 3/2 LINDA Transnation No. Customer Reference: Escrow No. Seller Buyer /Borrower . 3119645 • . Bolten . Mann For service on t is or er ca (425) 646 - 8583/1 -800- 441 -7701 HARRY 0. DREW, CHRIS SCURTI, ERIN CROWDER or NATHAN WARWICK (FAX # 425 646 -8576) SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: October 4, 2000 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy $120,000.00 Standard Policy (Residential Resale Rate) Proposed Insured: SHARON MANN, A SINGLE PERSON, AND /OR ASSIGNS Premium Tax $427.00 $ 36.72 Total $463.72 2. Title to fee simple estate in said land is at the effective date hereof BOULTON ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THIpSOUTHWEST NORTH,1 /RANGE 4,EASOUWHMESTDESCRIBED SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP FOLLOWS: BEGINNING 20 THE IOFESAIDTSUBDIVISIONNWITHETHE WESTERLY LINE SOUTHERLY 20 FEET 0 OF THE EASTERLY 25 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 130 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY WITH THE SOUDTHERLYELINEI,OFESAIDFEE ; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL SUBDIVISION 160 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 60 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL THEWITH TRUETHE POINTHOFLBEGINNING ;SAID SUBDIVISION 160 FEET SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Owner's Standard Policy SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $130,000.00 Premium: $ 448.00 Date of Policy: November 30, 2000 at 12:07 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: CITY OF TUKWILA, A WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL.. CORPORATION 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE Policy No. 3119721A 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 20.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 25.00 FEET THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 190.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 60.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °07'30" WEST 160.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °42'00" WEST PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 60.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °07'30" EAST 160.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF -KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. — Countersigned: C2L.22.4., Authorized Officer or Agent w 6 ' Order No. 3119540 LEGAL DESCRIPTION= SOUTHWEST 1/2 OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/2 OF THE 4 EAST W.M.; SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 1/2 OF THE BEGINNING 1/2 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/ 4 EAST SOUTHWEST 1/2 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE W.M.- ° EAST 346:62 FEET; TRUE POINT THENCE WEST, 00 T 88,58'30" WEST 25 FEET TO THE THENCE WEST, NORTH TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; OF BEGINNING OF THE WEST 160 FEET; THENCE WEST, NORTH 88°58'30" S76,62 FEET; T,NC SOUTH 00°42'00" 9°07'30" WEST 160 FEET; T NORTH THENCE EAST, NORTH 00 °42'00" EAST 76.62 FEET TO THE TRUE THENCE OF BEGINNING, LESS COUNTY � IF' COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF SITUATE IN THE CITY OF T WASHINGTON. Page 2 SGISlae XdW3N. VS:ST T00Z -170-NW Standard Policy • SCHEDULE A Ili F: 01 Policy No. 3119539A A mount of Insurance: $50,000.00 . A Premium: $ 310.00 2000 at 3:22 P.M. Date of Policy: October 5, 1. Name of Insured: MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF TUKWILA, A WASHINGTON which is covered by this policy CITY the land described herein and 2. The estate or interest icy is: 3. The estate or interest referred to herein FEE SIMPLE ESTATE is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED'"' is described as follows: 4 The land referred to in this policy 91- 02 -SS, ACCORDING TO THE 3 OF SHORT PLAT NO. Y RECORDING NO. SHORT 1 AND RECORDED UNDER KING COUNT SHORT PLA STATE OF 9107161044; TUKWILA� COUNTY OF KING, SITUATE IN THE CITY OF WASHINGTON. Countersigned: Authorized Officer or Agent 4Wr No. ,3119538' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 860 FEET; THENCE WEST 25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD, NOW KNOWN AS 37TH AVENUE -SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 323 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF 60 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 323 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 37TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE WEST 120 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 • Owner's Standard Policy Amount of Insurance: Premium: Date of Policy: SCHEDULE A $150,000.00 $ 490.00 November 30, 2000 at 12:07 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Policy No. 3120006A CITY OF TUKWILA, A WASHINGTON MUNICI -PAL CORPORATION 2. The estate or interest covered by this. policy FEE SIMPLE ESTATE in the land described herein and which is is: 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE THEREOF 860 FEET; THENCE WEST 25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST MARGIN OF THE COUNTY ROAD, NOW KNOWN AS 37TH AVENUE SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 323 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF 60 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF, 323 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 37TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN 60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE EAST 203 UNDER RECORDING NO. SITUATE IN THE, CITY WASHINGTON. Countersigned: FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED 8704201144; OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF 0,22„. Authorized Officer or Agent Owner's Standard Policy Amount of Insurance: Premium: Date of Policy: • SCHEDULE A $202,000.00 Policy No. 3119237A $ 592.00 REF# 503589 October 20, 2000 at 9:42 A.M. 1. Name of Insured: CITY OF TUKWILA, A WASHINGTON MUNSCIAL CORPORATION_ 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 4. The land referred to LOT 2 OF SHORT RECORDED UNDER SITUATE IN THE WASHINGTON. in this policy is described as follows: PLAT NO. 91- 02 -SS, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 9107161044; CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF Countersigned: Authorized Officer or Agent FND. YON. IN CASE W /'s10NE ACCEPTED AS _16TH•COR S15 q. ' r/ DASBN'NALL TACT . y ACCE PIED JAS r 328 L0T1j — 32s 13'41 L =23.56' 15.00 • \ tEWSU.0 , 6=901x000 712356 �$ 1500 2 *T0Jd/ Lord - . LOT J _ . i y4 ' • K827 417• 13S0i. NOTE: '. -. NCO FOUND MONUMENTS AS BOUNDARY FOR THE SW1 /4, SW1 /4; SEC.15, T23N, R4E. W.Y.. • 'I BRASS DISK MONUMENT 'ACCEPTED AS 161H COR. S15 Andrews Group. Lid- 914. 140TH AVE. NE. SUITE. 100 BELLEVUE. WASHINGTON 98005 (4T) 378 -9407 CASCADE VIEW: PARK BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SW1 /4, SW1 /4, SEC.15, 'T23N,:R4E,W.M. date .. revisions file no101309CVP �scnle� •1' =30'' - daSe02 -15 -2000