The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E01-016 - MOLUSE STEPHEN / RICHARD E JACOBS GROUP - SOUTHCENTER THEATER DEMOLITIONE01 -016 SOUTHCENTER MALL 15700 SOUTHCENTER MALL • • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING SOUTHCENTER THEATER (26.877 S.F.) IN PREPARATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BAHAMA BREEZE RESTAURANT (9.500 S . F .) . PROPONENT: R. E . JACOB; GROUP LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 15700 SOIJTHCENTER PY PARCEL NO: 115720-0292 SEC /7WN /RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E01-016 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not _required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c) . . This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on f i l e with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *lo • k• k• k• k• k•kk: k: k• k•*k: k: k: 4• k• k •k:k•k:kk•hk:kk•kk:kkkkk:k:.494 4•k kk k: 44. 444 4b kk: kk :44:k£•k:k:k::.kk4••kh:k.9k:kkk This determination is final and signed this day of ..gpoSr-___ 200/ . Steve Lancaster, R sponsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431 -3670 6.300 'Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. Dept. Of Community Development • City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Z-ES'[. - /e- HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing x Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance 6reCZe_ Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ' Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3AP day of/9(14 in the year 20 n/ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: (500thCen o-' Thee- *r & -ho»- 6reCZe_ Project Number: 4.0i- OR, 4 Mailer's Signature:. YV46...9___ 14eiLj---------- ' Person requesting mailing: 11 ,h P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHRIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE P.M MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 619Pc So dr) Co WTY\ s ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROT TIO AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SER ICES WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ()TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* () FFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( ) POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA . ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIV EFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VVW V PUBAOTICE MAILINGS FOR PES SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is maqed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3- part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATI VEFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC • City ofTCdlill„t Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF ANTICIPATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE DATED JULY 17, 2001 Project Name: Southcenter Theater demolition/Bahama Breeze construction (E01 -016) Project Description: Demolition of the existing Southcenter Theater (26,877 s.f.) to be replaced by a Bahama Breeze Restaurant (9,500 s.f.). Applicant: Richard E. Jacobs Group Project Location: 15700 Southcenter Parkway Tax Parcel 115720-0292 Permits Required by This Application: 1) SEPA Determination (E01 -016) 2) Design Review 3) Demolition Permit 4) Building Permit Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Anticipated Environmental Determination: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the city, it is anticipated that a Determination of Nonsignificance will be issued for the proposed project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11 -355 is being used. It is likely that the City of Tukwila will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. It is likely that an environment impact statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Consistent with the provisions of WAC 197 -11 -355, this may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Any person may submit written comments on the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2001. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: If timely comments do not identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Anticipated Environmental Determination, the Determination of Nonsignificance will be issued without a second comment period. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite100, Tukwila WA 98188. If you have any questions about this proposal contact Deborah Ritter, Associate Planner at 206 - 431 -3663. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 7 14 14 It ■ 0 It 7 17 .1 17 42 1: L. .- _..) C.,' 6 21 V NORDSTROM DEPT. STORE nocit 20 (040 01 2C7425 224 CMS MALL OFIES 1 ti G20 LI 20 20 6-979-) ca 1 , / • , iii rya; 1 . s • 2 , z),.70N -t.1AliCIIE PAIICE1- 42 : V22 -' // 0 i 1 272 $: ,...7,,,. 2 4 2 4 27 1 21 -------7‘) \-2: 6-3TS-) '/* ,--, HE BON MARCHE DEPT. STORE fOUN f ICONS 2 • s'e•■•21rs,, SITE LOCATOR MAP Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, LESL/ & HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: 10.11, 711cA cer De )i*on 84.,ha a. 13iecZe C4$4216'hr11 Notice of Public Meeting Mailer's Signature: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: pet Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 ' Other Nd1i� or ANTlcjPl7 DErbwt- +iwAr /ON OF NONS /UmR cow cz. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /70 day of --IIA 'r in the year 20 01 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: 10.11, 711cA cer De )i*on 84.,ha a. 13iecZe C4$4216'hr11 Project Number: 6-0/ — 0 /40 Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: pet P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHEOIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PE. MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION () DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIO A ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ()TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* () OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS &REC () K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT > PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ><AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () FIRE () FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR ( ) PUBLIC WORKS () POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWIIA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: \ADMINISTRATIV EFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC madkia- Ia tels ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WVWV PUBLNOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is ma?led/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMIN (STRATI V EFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC • • Cineplex Odion Theatres 15700 Southcenter Parkway Seattle, WA 98188 • City of71EgLd • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Comm r ; gait/ Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster y From: Deborah Ritter -.--_ Date: August 2, 2001 Re: E01 -016 (SEPA Determination) Southcenter Theater Demolition and Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant 15700 Southcenter Parkway Tax Parcel 115720 -0292 Project Description: This SEPA review is in connection with the demolition of the existing Southcenter Theater (26,877 square feet) which is to be replaced by the construction of a Bahama Breeze Restaurant (9,500 square feet). The subject property is located on a separate parcel in the northwest corner of the Southcenter Mall development. It is bordered on the west by Southcenter Boulevard and on the north by Tukwila Parkway. Parking areas serving Southcenter Mall are located to the south and east. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None. Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The Southcenter Mall site was developed in 1967. The subject site is paved and has an average slope of 2 %. Based on geotechnical reports prepared in 1966, 1967 and 1988 by Shannon and Wilson for the Southcenter Shopping Center Corporation, soils are assumed to be 14 to 18 feet of surface fill, underlain by 15 to 30 feet of interbedded compressible strata of organic clayey silt and peat. Beneath the compressible stratum there is generally a stratum of medium to dense sand and gravel will some shells and organics. This stratum is variable in 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 E01 -016 (SEPA Determination Demolition of Southcenter Theater Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant August 2, 2001 Page 2 • thickness, ranging from 10 to 20 feet. Beneath the medium dense sand and gravel stratum is a stratum of dense to very dense sand and gravel varying from 10 to 50 feet in thickness. The bottom unit is a hard, fine sandy silt. The amount of fill materials will be minimal and will be used for minor adjustments to the finish pavement elevations. A City- approved temporary erosion control plan will be in place prior to demolition and construction. • Air Dust and exhaust emissions will be generated during construction, with watering as necessary to control dust. Air quality during site demolition will be in compliance with the requirements of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. • Water No increase in the amount of surface water runoff is anticipated. All surface water runoff will meet the standards of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. • Plants A minimal amount of landscaping currently exists around the perimeter of the site, which will be retained if possible. The landscape design for the proposed restaurant will be evaluated by the Board of Architectural Review under a design review application. • Animals The site is nearly 100% impervious with very little vegetation. No animals have been observed on the site. • Energy /Natural Resources Electric power will be used for site lighting. • Environmental Health Noise generated by construction equipment will occur on a short-term basis. The hours of construction will comply with the City's noise ordinance. E01 -016 (SEPA Determination • • Demolition of Southcenter Theater Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant August 2, 2001 Page 3 • Land /Shoreline Use • The site is located in the Tukwila Urban Center zoning district which allows restaurants as a permitted use. The subject parcel is part of the larger Southcenter Mall development. Housing N/A Aesthetics The design of the proposed single -story restaurant will be evaluated by the Board of Architectural review under a design review application. The design theme will be Caribbean with associated ornamental landscape plantings. • Light and Glare Site lighting (including security lighting) shall be directed away from adjoining properties and public rights -of -way. • Recreation N/A • Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. • Transportation The subject property is bordered on the west by Southcenter Boulevard and on the north by Tukwila Parkway. Parking areas serving Southcenter Mall are located to the south and east. Based on the traffic report prepared by The Transpo Group, dated May 31, 2001, the proposed restaurant will generate virtually the same amount of traffic currently generated by the cinema. No new impacts to traffic are anticipated. Approximately 234 parking spaces are proposed. E01 -016 (SEPA Determination Demolition of Southcenter Theater Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant August 2, 2001 Page 4 • • Public Services No increase in the demand for public services is anticipated. • Utilities The project will not increase demand on the utility systems. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance. • City of Tukwila • Steven i'1. iLlullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director June 27, 2001 Stephen G. Moluse Director of Site Planning Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. 25425 Center Ridge Road Cleveland, Ohio 44145 -4122 Re: SEPA Determination (E01 -016) Demolition of Southcenter Theater Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant 15700 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Moluse: We have received and reviewed your documentation for the above - referenced application, submitted to us on June 18, 2001. We have the following comments. Your application for a SEPA Determination has been found to be incomplete. In order to continue processing your application there are additional items that must be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Our comments regarding these items are listed below. The SEPA application you submitted on June 18th (copy enclosed) gave a property address of 633 Southcenter Parkway, which is incorrect. The correct address is 15700 Southcenter Parkway and the Tax Parcel Number is 115720- 0292. Please complete the SEPA application form we have enclosed and return to the attention of the undersigned. 2. The Affidavit of Ownership you submitted on June 18th (copy enclosed) gave a property address of 633 Southcenter Parkway, which is incorrect. The correct address is 15700 Southcenter Parkway. Please complete the blank Affidavit we have enclosed and return to the attention of the undersigned. 3. The copies of SEPA Checklist you submitted on June 18th were signed but not dated. We are enclosing one copy for your reference. Please submit four signed and dated copies. 4. Page 3 of your SEPA Checklist refers to a Sub - Surface Geotechnical Report dated November, 1998 as an attachment. We were not provided with that report. Please submit two copies. 03(10 Southce! ?r,» »- Soulcvard. Suite . #/00 • Tukwila, Washington Q8/38 • Phone: 200-431•3070 • Fax: 20643/-3665 Mr. Stephen G. Moluse June 27, 2001 Page 2 • 5. Page 18 of your SEPA Checklist refers to a Traffic Memorandum dated May 25, 2001 as an attachment. We were not provided with that memo. Please submit two copies. 6. Please submit four full -sized copies of the site plan. Your application packet only contained one 8 -1/2" x 11" version. Upon receipt of Items 1 -6 above, the City will continue processing your applications. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within 90 days of the date of this letter, unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.104.070(E) of the Tukwila Municipal Code. PLEASE NOTE: We anticipate that the two proposed restaurant sites along the north side of Strander Boulevard will require separate SEPA and Design Review (either as a combination of the two or as two separate proposals). Additionally (as explained in your pre - application meeting), if you wish to separate the sites of those proposed restaurants from the larger parcel, you will need to apply for a Binding Site Improvement Plan. If you should have any questions regarding the within, please do not hesitate to contact me at 206 - 431 -3663. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Associate Planner Enclosures Deborah rnmtt:R e: Parcel 115720029 Page 1� From: Deborah Ritter To: MLUTTHANS @aol.com Date: 7/25/01 2:54PM Subject: Re: Parcel 1157200292 My name is Deborah Ritter and I am the Planner assigned to this project. My phone number in the Planning Department is 206 -431 -3663. The File No. is E01 -016. As posted on the Notice Board, the applicant is R.E. Jacobs Group, owner of Southcenter Mall. Their application was filed June 18, 2001. The ordinance you refer to applies to parking lots or parking structures when they are the primary use. The ordinance does not apply to this proposal. The parking that is proposed for the restaurant is an associated use and the restaurant is the primary use. If you wish to see the file, please contact me to arrange a time to review it at the counter. 2 Deborah Ritter - Parcel 1157200292 - Page 1 From: <MLUTTHANS @aol.com> To: <tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 7/24/01 10:53PM Subject: Parcel 1157200292 Hello. There is a proposed land use sign on this parcel. Can you tell me any info, such as Who filed the paperwork? How can they be contacted? When was it filed? Does the application conform with city ordinance 1957, which puts a moratoreum on additional public parking, as I understand it. (The new building will be one third the size of the current one, with the remaining space apparently to be used for parking.) Thank you, Matt Lutthans State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA- Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, - WA.. 98188 Telephone, (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukp tukwila. wa. us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I Intl). ke (P" (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. • I certify that on 1 - 11 - 0 ( the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the otherpa$plicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 15100 t (Tt-er I 1 KWdtko as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular _access . -to the - property for application fitle,number EO ! - 01 7u .. I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me A t ke ta•!N S-e,n to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /sip signed the same as his/lnit voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2-6/1". day of TSLLU -\ , -2-01 1''1.\-- �^n �?�^ 1 • ^��," NARY PUBLIC and for the State of Washington �; ,, , ' . c' - residing at ke-".'� '3 I kCi\Oi " 1'.. , . , ��`,�` My commission expires on Pilb,., • ,1 ,', July 11, 2001 • City of 11°g 1�3 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Stephen G. Moluse Director of Site Planning Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. 25425 Center Ridge Road Cleveland, Ohio 44145 -4122 VIA FAX 440 - 808 -6907 Re: Demolition of Southcenter Theater and Construction of Bahama Breeze Restaurant 15700 Southcenter Parkway, Tukwila, WA SEPA Determination (E01 -016) Dear Stephen: Your application for a SEPA Determination has been found to be complete as of July 11, 2001 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. Essentially, this means that you have supplied the required items listed on the application checklist for this type of permit. We are enclosing a copy of the "Notice of Application" and site map that will be posted on the notice board at the site. We have made a laminated copy available to Mikel Hansen for posting on July 17, 2001. This is the same day that we will be mailing public notice to property owners, tenants and businesses within 500 feet of the project. After Mr. Hansen has posted the laminated Notice on the sign, he is to return the signed and notarized "Affidavit of Installation and Posting" to me. We are about to commence our technical review process, which is the next phase in the processing of your Special Permission application. Although your application has been found to be "complete ", the items you supplied may have to be revised or amended. The City may also require that you submit additional plans and information to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City and to finalize the review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, urafk Deborah Ritter Associate Planner cc: Mikel Hansen, Southcenter Mall (w /enclosure) Fire Department Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 04 :21PM ENGIN- NG LEASING -P4:-T. erA-ve our -*iv IIECEIVE JUL 0 6 2001 COMMUNITY if DEVELOPMENT P.1/2 • H 0 A if MALL STORES • f V BON MARCHE DEFT. STORE FLOORS MALL STORES ter MALL STORES SHOPPING THE BOO JCPENN DiCL FIRE IdERVeN NORDST SFAS TOTAL I MALL S DACL TOT, IOU S/C PARI fERffel—_ JUL.06 '01 04 :22PM ENGINfilyiNG LEASING_. Memorandum Stephen G. Moluse 140407 - LI? 51,,e04 1,0647rOg Z. y am^ 44441a (-344-1 F"se (durri-t! t9F. Vce. '"FloP4' ' .1 L , ...tt.swe btu 4 To ya= W..) ~ham ..,3 L ,C J6,Q4 OF r ti � jL�► �+� 41 The Richard E. Jacobs Group , P.2 /2 A --JUL 06.'01 04 :22PM ENGIN•NG LEASING P.1 /2 mor000k A m .Or 3 4.r Ada -5Q L* THE BON MARCHE DEPT. STORE ILROLM noon � MARCHE PARCEL 14.1714 MRCS 14311 CMS z MALL STORES THE HO DVIL JCPi1 FIRE MERVYN NORDST TOTAL I MALL S' as TOTI TOW S/C PARI ING LEASING ■■ The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS - PRIORITY Stephen G. Moluse, A. S. L. A.* Director of Site Planning smoluse@rejacobsgroup.com Direct Dial No. (440) 808 -7505 FAX: (440) 808 -6907 July 3, 2001 Cm' OFTUKWILA JUL — 5 2001 Ms. Deborah Ritter, Associate Planner PERMirCENTER City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SEPA DETERMINATION SOUTHCENTER MALL Dear Ms. Ritter: Attached for your use in processing our SEPA Determination Application are the additional items that you requested in your June 27, 2001 correspondence. We have revised the SEPA application and Affidavit of Ownership to show the address of the Cinema as opposed to Southcenter Mall and have enclosed four (4) additional copies of the dated SEPA Checklist as well as two (2) additional copies of the Geotechnical Report and Traffic Memorandum. We are also including four (4) full -size copies of the Bahama Breeze site plan. Thank you for your assistance, we look forward to working with you to complete the SEPA Determination process. If you have questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me at (440) 808 -7505. Very truly yours, THE CHARD E. JACOBS GROUP, INC. Stephe G. Moluse Director of Site Planning SGM:Img Enclosure 25425 Center Ridge Road • Cleveland, Ohio 44145 -4122. Phone: 440 - 871 -4800 • Web site: www.REJacobsGroup.com CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E -mail: tukplane.ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: b ero. a 1&IyT LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 151oO �arts.t6f.A,s(Me- 044441.0.4r U51 —02.1e- 1014-14114.. I WA Quarter: Section: '24 Township: Range: + (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and •• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: .. ! / Vii- b RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUL - 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER Address:g.e.skto ‘igate X42 tuizte- r7 vat l4l�� Phone: +40 • Dag 1505 FAX: 6 • E 3 8 • 1930 Signature: G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: [t ND 1 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P-SEPA Planner: r410 o_ File Number: -C-3 i — 0 1 l0 Application Complete ( Date: �11_��) Project File Number: Q_E_on _b(„� Application Incomplete (Dater _ ,a') (A Other File Numbers: l NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: b ero. a 1&IyT LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 151oO �arts.t6f.A,s(Me- 044441.0.4r U51 —02.1e- 1014-14114.. I WA Quarter: Section: '24 Township: Range: + (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and •• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: .. ! / Vii- b RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUL - 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER Address:g.e.skto ‘igate X42 tuizte- r7 vat l4l�� Phone: +40 • Dag 1505 FAX: 6 • E 3 8 • 1930 Signature: G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: [t ND 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukolanaci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERIIVIISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY SS The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: SZEAM sWi1 l . I i the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. RECEIVED CITY Of TUKWILA JUL - 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 1110 O (2ot iee,t 4 p,6.ge.447 ?pµ 1I 0-1 2 • o Zy Z for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city) C j4 (state), on SLY jrt1 2eC! Mol, (Print cis L_ l,r , tuveirz. ICY At.ress) e (Phone ignature) m 7n this day personally appeared before me Sl��c1 �� lam. // /oLVS. to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing-instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS gar DAY OF 1 • oZ DO/ NOTAR, BLIC in and for the Sta of �j 0/!`r"0_._�" �j" /�Q residing at ££554 6 &t fr / lei t*A�r • ( /.luer cxa�c t My Commission expires on ?At." � o(OO �o Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Southcenter Mall - Restaurant/Retail Re- Development Southcenter Joint Venture 2. Name of Applicant: Southcenter Mall 633 Southcenter Parkway Agency Comments .JUN 1 2801 PERMIT CENTER Tukwila, Washington 3. Date checklist prepared: 1 -10 -01 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start of Construction Spring 2002 RECEIVED Cry OF TUKwu JUL - 5 2001 PERMIT CENTER 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This project contemplates the development of three (3) out - parcel buildings which will be constructed as market conditions permit. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None at this time, however it is likely that prospective tenants will undertake Phase I Environmental Reviews of the property prior to entering into a ground lease. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? .If yes, explain.. None. G.\ APPHANV.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 1. Design Review through Tukwila Board of Architecture Review will be required. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Demolition of existing 26,877 SF Cinema and replacing with a single ±9,500 SF sit -down restaurant. 11. Location of the proposal, Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Southcenter Mall. See attached Site Plan and Vicinity Map. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. G.\A PPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Agency Comments 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one I rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Fully developed with high density retail buildings and parking. The portion of property to be re- developed is 100% building or parking lot area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached Sub - surface Geotechnical Report dated Nnvemher 199R_ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. See attached Sub - surface Geotechnical. Report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor adjustment of finish pavement elevations to accommodate the proposed finished floor elevations. No major cut /fill expected. G.\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP DOC, 06/16/00 3 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The amount of impervious area will be REDUCED due to increase in landscape area and net reduction of building area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction sequencing will minimize exposure of subgrade and removal of pavement in building areas. Construction accPSS roadways will be designed to minimize tracking of soil & earth off -site. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No significant change in the type or quantity of emissions is anticipated as a result of this project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. 4. G MPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control measures will be implemented during demolition and construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP DOC, 06/16/00 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. . Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No change from existing condition. G \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No change from existing condition. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: There will be no increase in surface water runoff. G. \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None, however additional landscape planting will be proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscape planting will be compatible with existing landscape planting on -site. G.\ APPHANU.ANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC. 06/.16/00 8 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Same as existing condition. G UPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 9 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All building HVAC equipment will be installed in accordance with the Washington State Energy Code Requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. G:WPHAMLANDUS E.APPL$EPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 10 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Automobile traffic noise. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary construction noise during daytime work hours. Traffic noise consistent with existing conditions. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Coninercial Retail, b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. G .UPPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 11 i Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. See attached Site Plan. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Existing Cinema building will be demolished to permit development of new Restaurant /Retail use. e. 'What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial CP District f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Tukwila Urban Center Zone g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. G:WPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP DOC, 06/16/00 12 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? New employees: 15 , No residential proposed. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to -avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N.A. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. - G: APPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 13 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. ' Applicant Responses: b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high; middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Proposed out - parcel development shall be single -story building with exterior materials compatible with existing Shopping Center construction. Agency Comments b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, however the overall aesthetic appearance will be improved by the addition of foundation landscape planting and due to the fact that the two -story Cinema building will be replaced by a smaller structure. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Same as 'b' above. G:\APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP. DOC, 06/16/00 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No change from existing condition. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A G UPPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 15 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. , Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. GAAPPHAMLANDUSE APP \SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 16 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. , Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached Site Plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See attached Parking Summary. (Site Plan) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). _ No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. G.\APPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 17 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached traffic memorandum dated May 31, 2001 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None required_ 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for exaniple: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increased demand on public services will result. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N.A. 16. • Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: system other: Private refuse service will be used. refuse service CWPHAMLANOUSE.APP\SEPAAPP DOC. 06/16/00 septic 18 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All required utilities are in place. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowleeige. I understand that the lead agency is re , 'n: on the • t• make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: '1 1 od (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). GAAPPHAN \LANDUSE.APPZEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 19 0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. G.WPPHA ALANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Agency Comments Geotechnical Report Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center Tukwila, Washington. RECEIVED.- . , C/TY OF TUKWILA Jt1L - 5 2001 PERMIT ceivrEm Center Ridge Design Services Inc. 25425 Center Ridge Road Cleveland, OH 44145-4122 November 1988 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W-4978-01 CONSULTANT William L. Shannon. P.E. SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants Engineering and Applied Geosciences 1105 North 38th Street • P.O. Box C -30313 • Seattle, WA 98103 -8067 • (206) 632 -8020 • Cable: GEOSAW W- 4978 -01 December 6, 1988 Center Ridge Design Services, Inc., P.A. 25425 Center Ridge Road Cleveland, Ohio 44145 -4122 Attn: Mr. Thomas P. Schmitz, P.E. RE: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Tom: We are pleased to present to you five (5) copies of our geotechnical report for the proposed new Additional Mall Shops at the Southcenter Shopping Center. Our work was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal letter dated May 27, 1988, and authorized by letter dated June 10, 1988 and revised agreement dated July 12, 1988 from Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. This report completes our present assignment for foundation engineering recommendations for this project. We will be pleased to work with you and your structural engineer in the design and construction phases of this structure. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me or Jim Wu. It has been a pleasure assisting you with this project. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Rayti nd P. Miller, P.E. Exe tive Vice President RPM /lkd Enclosures: Geotechnical Report (5 copies) Seattle • Everett • Spokane • Portland • Fairbanks • Anchorage • St. Louis Earl A. Sibley, P.E. Raymond P. Miller, P.E. Chairman of the Board Executive Vice President President George Yamane, P.E. Harvey W. Parker, P.E. Vice President Vice President Atef A. Aaam Vice President W- 4978 -01 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2.1 Location and Site 1 2.2 Project 2 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2 4.0 PREVIOUS FIELD EXPLORATIONS 3 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 5.1 Geologic Setting 4 5.1.1 Regional 4 5.1.2 Local 5 5.2 General Stratigraphy 6 5.2.1 Fill 6 5.2.2 Soft to Medium Stiff Organic Silt and Peat 7 5.2.3 Medium Dense to Dense Sand and,Gravel 7 5.2.4 Dense to Very Dense Sand and Gravel 7 5.2.5 Hard Layered Silt 7 5.3 Groundwater Conditions 8 6.0 ENGINEERING STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 6.1 General 8 6.2 Settlement of Site 8 6.3 Building Foundation Support 10 6.3.1 Foundation Support Schemes 10 6.3.2 Pile Types 10 6.3.3 Downdrag and Bearing Strata 11 6.3.4 Pile Penetrations and Capacities 12 6.3.5 Lateral Resistance of Piles 13 6.3.6 Pile Driving Equipment and Criteria 14 6.3.7 Estimated Settlements of Pile Foundations 17 6.3.8 Test Pile Program 17 6.3.9 Monitoring Pile Driving 18 6.4 Floor Support 6.5 Site Preparation and Earthwork i 19 20 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) 6.6 Seismic Design Criteria 6.6.1 Characteristic Site Period 6.6.2 Ground Stability 6.7 Drainage and Backfill Requirements 6.8 Lateral Earth Pressures Against Permanent Structures 7.0 LIMITATIONS LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1 Pile and Driving Equipment Data LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Site Location Plan 2 Boring Location Plan 3 Generalized Subsurface Profile A -A' 4 Generalized Subsurface Profile B -B' 5 Generalized Subsurface Profile C -C' 6 Lateral Resistance of 16.5 -inch Octagonal Prestressed Concrete Pile - Fixed Head 7 Lateral Resistance of of 16.5 -inch Octagonal Prestressed Concrete Pile - Free Head W- 4978 -01 Page 21 21 21 22 23 26 8 Lateral Resistance of 16 -inch 0.D. x 3/8 -inch Wall Steel Pipe Pile - Fixed Head 9 Lateral Resistance of 16 -inch 0.D. x 3/8 -inch Wall Steel Pipe Pile - Free Head ii SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Figure No. 10 Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving, 16.5 -inch Octagonal Prestressed Concrete Pile 11 Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving, 16 -inch 0.D. x 3/8 -inch Wall Steel Pipe Pile 12 Test Pile Location Plan 13 Subdrainage and Backfilling SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering studies for -the foundation design of the Additional Mall Shops at the Southcenter Shopping Center, Tukwila, Washington. Borings were previously completed at the site and for adjacent facilities in 1961, 1966, and July 1988. Our engineering analyses, conclusions, and recommendations are based on these previous field boring explorations and our earlier experience in the vicinity of the project site, including our previous reports pertaining to adjacent facilities, and construction pile driving records in the vicinity. This work was accomplished in general accordance with our proposal letter dated May 27, 1988. Authorization to proceed with our work was given by letter dated June 10, 1988 from Center Ridge Design Services, Inc., together with the executed revised agreement dated July 12, 1988. The report includes a.,brief description of the project and scope of our work, together with our conclusions and recommendations, based on our engineering studies and analyses. It is our understanding that no structural engineer has yet been assigned to this project; _ therefore, our approach has included some assumptions and considers several alternative pile types for-foundation support. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Site The proposed Additional Mall Shops are to become a part of the Southcenter Shopping Center, Tukwila, Washington, about 3 miles west of Renton and approximately 20 miles south of Seattle, Figure 1. The mall shops are to be 1 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK A great deal is known about the general subsurface conditions, design, and construction of the Southcenter Shopping Center. Because of the previous boring explorations, engineering studies, testing, and pile driving experience in the immediate vicinity of the site, it was our opinion that no additional borings or laboratory tests were necessary in connection with this report. Engineering studies have been directed primarily toward building foundation requirements, including recommended pile types, capacities and estimated lengths, lateral resistance of piles, driving criteria, estimated settlements, and test pile program. Other items addressed in our report include floor support, earthwork, seismic design considerations, lateral earth pressures, drainage and backfill requirements, and construction considerations. Pertinent information from previous site explorations, laboratory and field test data, engineering studies, and construction at Southcenter has been reviewed and 2 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. 3 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. : W- 4978 -01 5, has been developed from borings H -7 and C -1, the latter also from our report of August 29, 1988. The logs of these borings, together with others in the vicinity, have been reproduced and are included in Appendix A. 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5.1 Geologic Setting 5.1.1 Regional The Southcenter Shopping Center lies on the floor of the north -south trending Duwamish Valley. The floor of the valley ranges from 10 to 25 feet above sea level and in nature is broad and quite flat. The Green River presently occupies a portion of this valley, flowing northward through the valley approximately 1/2 -mile east of the site. The Duwamish Valley lies in a much larger region known as the Puget Sound lowland. This lowland is a major linear depression (structural and topographic) that trends northward between the Olympic Mpuntains on the west and the Cascade Range on the east. Tertiary sedimentary and igneous rocks making up the Puget Group are exposed in relatively few places within the lowland; where encountered they are generally well- weathered, fractured, and occasionally faulted. Pleistocene (glacial age) sediments consist predominantly of drift deposited during repeated invasions of the Puget Sound lowland by ice lobes that originated in the coastal mountains of British Columbia. At least four glacial drift sheets and their related deposits are recognized in the lowland. 4 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 5.1.2 Local The site of the present study is relatively flat, and has an average elevation of +27 feet. It is underlain at relatively shallow depth by rocks belonging to the Puget Group. Hard silt or "siltstone" was recognized in several borings in the vicinity. Rocks associated with the Puget Group outcrop immediately to the north of the site and on both sides of the Duwamish Valley. Materials overlying bedrock consist of estuary, stream, and glacial deposits of tills, sands, gravels, silts, clays, peats, and organic clays. During Pleistocene time the general site was buried under about 3,000 feet of glacial ice during four periods of glaciation. During the last period, the Vashon ice sheet scoured the valley floor in places to bedrock and deposited glacial till in and along the borders of the valley during its advance and retreat, leaving the mid- valley rock floor far below sea level. After the recession of the Vashon ice, waters of Puget Sound occupied the Duwamish Valley as indicated by the marine shells in most of the borings. Subsequently, the Green and White River deltas, combined with the estuary deposits, filled the valley to its present level. In 1906 the White River was diverted to the south. Estuary deposits of late Pleistocene to Recent age are principally peat, silt, and clay and are present as back -swamp deposits. Since the general site is located along the western edge of the valley, there is a general slope to the east of both the bedrock and glacial till subsurface. Thus the depth to firm material generally increases in an easterly direction at the site. 5 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 5.2 General Stratigraphy The general subsurface conditions encountered at the proposed project site are generalized on the subsurface profiles shown on Figures 3 through 5. More detailed subsurface conditions are shown on the individual boring logs. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered as shown on the profiles and individual boring logs, the subsoils can be divided into five units: 1) Fill, 2) soft to medium stiff organic Silt and Peat, 3) medium dense to dense Sand and Gravel, with shells and organics, 4) dense to very dense Sand and Gravel, with shells and organics, and 5) Hard layers of sandy Silt. The stratigraphy generally consists of 14 to 18 feet of surface Fill, which was previously obtained from borrow areas in the vicinity of the site. The Fill is underlain by 15 to 30 feet of interbedded compressible strata of organic clayey Silt and Peat. Beneath the compressible stratum there is generally a stratum of medium to dense Sand and Gravel with some shells :and .organics. This stratum is variable in thickness, ranging from 10 to 20 feet thick within the site boundaries. Beneath the medium dense Sand and Gravel stratum is a stratum of dense to very dense Sand and Gravel varying from 10 feet to more than 50 feet in thickness at H -8. This stratum contains some cobbles and boulders at some locations. The bottom unit is a hard, fine, sandy Silt (rock -like in some borings). 5.2.1 Fill It is our understanding that the site fill was obtained from borrow areas in the hillside generally west of the site area. The in -situ soils in the borrow areas consisted of strata of silt and clay, sand, and gravel. Based on the Standard Penetration Resistance (N) obtained in the fill, it is generally well- compacted. The N- values are predominantly less than 30. However, they range from as low as 8 at boring H-7 to as much as 26 at boring H -8. The N- values are normally higher in the upper portion, possibly due to drying and more systematic compaction during placement. 6 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 5.2.2 Soft to Medium Stiff Organic Silt and Peat The soils classified as organic silt consist predominantly of soft to medium stiff, organic, blue -gray to brown, clayey silts with some fine sand and gravel. Some of the silts exhibit a livery texture. The water content ranges from 25 to 71 percent. The peat consists predominantly of soft to stiff fibrous material which generally contains a considerable amount of silt or clay. The water content varies from 25 to 215 percent. Standard Penetration Test N- values for these materials range from 1 to 13 blows per foot. 5.2.3 Medium Dense to Dense Sand and Gravel The somewhat silty sand and gravel encountered underneath the site is part of an alluvial deposit containing some sea shells and organics and was found to be generally wet. The water content ranges from 4 to 21 percent. Standard Penetration Resistances range from 15 to 50 blows per foot. 5.2.4 Dense to Very Dense Sand and Gravel The dense to very dense slightly silty sand and gravel also contains shells and some organics. The Standard Penetration Resistances are greater than 30 blows per foot and range up to 50 blows for 2 inches. 5.2.5 Hard Layered Silt The hard silts encountered here are predominantly weathered, distorted layers of hard, sandy silt. This material generally exhibits "rock- like" characteristics being somewhat cemented. The water content ranges from 4 to 30 percent with an average of 18 percent. 7 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 5.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater levels were observed during drilling at previous borings and some were measured following drilling. Based on the results of observation and measurement during drilling for adjacent proposed Department Store No. 5, groundwater levels range in depth from approximately 16 to 40 feet below the surface. Boring C -1 was monitored for 5 days. At the beginning of the fifth day the water level was at 5.5 feet, along with borings C -4 and C -5. Borings H -7 and H -8 show the groundwater at the surface in 1961. 6.0 ENGINEERING STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 General Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the current borings and our review of the previous borings, pile load test results, and the pile driving records for the existing J.C. Penney and Shell Structure (mall) buildings, engineering studies were conducted to develop recommendations for 1) building foundation support, 2) floor support, 3) site preparation and earthwork, 4) seismic design criteria, 5) lateral earth pressures, 6) drainage considerations, and 7) other related geotechnical work. Architectural and structural plans were not available during preparation of this report. Certain assumptions were made, therefore, for our engineering studies. We have also assumed that the design would be accomplished under the provisions of the 1985 Uniform Building Code. 6.2 Settlement of Site The Southcenter site is largely underlain by soft compressible material as described under Section 5.0, Subsurface Conditions. Since the proposed Additional Mall Shops completely overlie the soft material, this facility must be supported by deep foundations; hence, structural loads will not 8 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W- 4978 -01 induce significant compression of the compressible material. However, the weight of the existing 15 to 20 -foot thick fill placed on the site in the early 1960's has caused considerable settlements up to the present time and will lead to additional settlements largely occurring during the next 10 to 15 years. The mechanism of compression of organic materials, such as those underlying the site, is not clearly understood; however, it is known that in general, the rate of compression of such materials, under a given load, decreases exponentially with time. Therefore, if the magnitude of applied load and consequent settlement at some elapsed time are known, reasonably accurate settlement predictions can be formulated. Based on the understanding that the fill over the site was placed between the summer of 1959 and the summer of 1962, and from the limited information available from site surveys and sequence of filling operations, the above method of calcu- lation indicates at least 2 to 6 inches of additional settlement could occur over the major portion of the site during the next 10 to 15 years. Because the deposit of soft compressible material is somewhat erratic, both in character and in thickness, the final settlements should also be expected to be erratic. The anticipated settlement of the site will generate certain problems which should be included in the design considerations for the building. The most significant of these problems are as follows: 1) downdrag loads will be induced on foundation support piles due to negative skin friction between the settling soils and piles. The magnitude of downdrag loads will be discussed in subsequent sections; 2) utilities and service lines extending beneath the building, should be anchored to the structure. The settlement of the fill will require that utilities services outside the building be articulated to allow for the estimated movements. This will necessitate special consideration in the design of utilities connections to the building; 3) provisions for storm water drainage of the ground should also be designed in anticipation of the projected site settle- ments; and 4) void spaces occurring under the floor slab as the fill settles may require special provisions to prevent the accumulation of noxious gases produced by decay of organic matter in the underlying organic silt and peat. 9 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W- 4978 -01 6.3 Building Foundation Support 6.3.1 Foundation Support Schemes As indicated in the previous Section 6.2, in our opinion, the compressible soils underlying the site are still settling under the existing fill load. Additional settlements could be greater than 2 inches in the next 10 years. We, therefore, recommend that the proposed Additional Mall Shops structure be pile supported. Our engineering studies on pile foundations include 1) pile types, 2) downdrag and bearing strata, 3) penetrations and capacities, 4) lateral resistances of piles, 5) pile driving equipment and criteria, 6) estimated settlements, and 7) test piles. 6.3.2 Pile Types The existing J.C. Penney building and mall corridor areas located immediately south and west of the proposed building site are supported by mandrel- driven Raymond pipe step -taper piles. Pile tip 'elevations along the north edge of the mall corridor area (glass wall, Figure 2) range from -84 to -114 feet, west to east. Existing pile tip elevations bordering the west edge (glass wall) of the proposed Additional Mall Shops range in elevation from -65 to -87 feet, north to south. If the proposed mall structure loads are similar to those of the existing mall structure, based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, we recommend that prestressed concrete piles and closed -end steel pipe piles be considered as foundation piles in addition to Raymond step -taper piles. The recommended pile types and sizes are thus as follows: • 16.5 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete piles 10 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W- 4978 -01 • 16- inch - diameter steel pipe piles driven closed -end with a flat bottom plate • Raymond step -taper piles with a 12 -1/4 -inch tip diameter (Shell No. 2) 6.3.3 Downdrag and Bearing Strata As previously mentioned, additional settlements greater than 2 inches could occur under the existing fill load in the next 10 years. Case histories on pile foundations indicate that this magnitude of ground surface settlement could cause full negative skin friction or downdrag load on piles embedded in the underlying bearing layers. Thus, all piles should penetrate through the upper fill and compressible soil layers and into the very dense sand and gravel layers, the recommended bearing strata. In 1967, six pile pull -out tests were performed on Raymond step -taper piles with 12 -1/4 -inch tip diameter and 14- inch - diameter steel pipe piles, for evaluating the downdrag in the fill and compressible soil layers. The test results are summarized as follows: Pile Type Raymond Step -Taper Tip Dia. 12 -1/4 ", Butt Dia. 16 -3/8" Raymond Step -Taper Tip Dia. 12 -1/4 ", Butt Dia. 16 -3/8" Measured Downdrag Load 1967 Pull -out Tests Prebored Approx. Penetration Thru Fill Measured Downdraq (feet) (tons) 40 40 No 120 Yes 55 Steel Pipe 14" Dia. 40 No 60 11 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 Negative skin friction or downdrag load could be reduced by coating piles with bitumen or by driving piles into predrilled holes. Our studies indicate, however, that a satisfactory pile foundation could be obtained without reducing negative skin friction for prestressed concrete or steel pipe piles. For Raymond step -taper piles, predrilling through the fill layer will be required to reduce the downdrag load, in our opinion. 6.3.4 Pile Penetrations and Capacities The estimated penetrations and capacities for 16.5 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete piles, 16 -inch 0.D. steel pipe piles (driven closed - end), and Raymond step -taper piles, and for subsurface conditions encountered in borings H -7, H -8, and C -4 are summarized as follows: Estimated Pile Penetrations and Capacities Allowable Est. Est. Ultimate Skin Friction Ultimate Design Boring Tip 1 2 Total End 3 Comp. Load Pile Type No. Elev. Negative Positive Ten. Cap. Bearing (2 +3- 1)/2.5 ft. (tons) (tons) (tons) (,tons) tons(FS =2.5) 16.5 -in. H -7 -46 80 82 162 156 63 Concrete H -8 -53 60 136 196 156 93 C -4 -43 80 82 162 187 76 16 -in. 0.D. H -7 -61 60 90 150 167 79 Steel Pipe H -8 -68 50 130 180 167 99 C -4 -45 60 65 125 168 69 Raymond H -7 -61 70* 142 212 98 68 Step -Taper H -8 -68 55 212 267 98 102 C -4 -45 70 106 176 123 64 * Assume a prebored hole through fill to be 1 -inch smaller than the pile butt diameter. Based on the results listed above, the recommended allowable design compression loads are: 12 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 • 75 tons for 16.5 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete piles • 75 tons for 16 -inch 0.D. steel pipe piles driven closed -end • 70 tons for Raymond step -taper piles with a 12 -1/4 -inch tip diameter Using the estimated total tension capacities listed above and a factor of safety of 3, the recommended allowable design tension or uplift loads are: • 50 tons for 16.5 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete piles • 40 tons for 16 -inch 0.D. steel pipe piles driven closed -end • 50 tons for Raymond step -taper piles with a 12 -1/4 -inch tip diameter Pile compression and tension capacities may be increased by 33 percent for seismic loading conditions. In addition, the pile tip elevations shown above are estimated and provided for design purposes only. As noted, both pipe piles and the mandrel- driven, Raymond step-taper piles are expected to penetrate at least 15 to 20 feet deeper than the concrete piles, at profiles represented by borings H -7 and H -8. The production pile order length should be determined after evaluating the results of test piles as discussed in Section 6.3.8. 6.3.5 Lateral Resistance of Piles Lateral loads acting on the structure may be resisted by the passive earth pressure against the pile caps and grade beams, the frictional resistance developed between the sides of the pile cap, and the lateral resistance provided by the vertical piles. The frictional sliding resistance at the base of the pile cap should be ignored, in our opinion, because a pile - supported structure may not transmit load directly to the soil beneath the pile cap. We recommend that passive earth pressures developed from compacted granular fill against the pile caps and grade beams be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 180 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This value applies to 13 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 soils above the groundwater table and assumes that the pile caps and grade beams are founded at least 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade and includes a factor of safety of 2.0. We further recommend that a frictional coefficient of 0.4 be used to estimate the frictional resistance between the sides of the pile cap and the soils. Lateral resistance analyses of a single 16.5 -inch octagonal concrete pile and a 16 -inch 0.D. steel pipe pile were made using the subsurface profile conditions represented by borings H -7 and H -8. The lateral resistance of each pile was analyzed using a beam on elastic foundation computer program for both fixed and free -head conditions. The results of deflection, moment, and shear in the piles at various depths are presented in Figures 6 through 9. Since this computer program is based upon an elastic analysis, the deflection, moment, and shear are directly proportional to the magnitude of the horizontal loads. As shown in Figures 6 and 8, under a fixed head condition and a horizontal load of 5 kips, the lateral deflections are 0.17 and 0.19 inches for 16.5 - inch concrete and 16 -inch steel pipe piles, respectively. Assuming that the allowable pile cap movement is 0.5 -inch, these piles may resist a horizontal load of about 15 kips. If additional lateral resistances are required, batter piles may be considered for resisting lateral loads. Horizontal subgrade reaction constants and strength parameters of soils used in our analyses are listed under the heading "Soil Data in the respective Figures 6 -9. The horizontal subgrade reaction constants were reduced by a factor of 1/2 for repetitive loading. 6.3.6 Pile Driving Equipment and. Criteria Fixed lead pile driving equipment is recommended to drive the piles. The use of hanging or swinging leads is not recommended unless they are constructed so that they can be held in a fixed position during driving 14 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 operations. Leads should be of sufficient length so that the use of followers will not be necessary. An air -, steam -, or diesel - powered hammer may be used for driving the recommended 16.5 -inch octagonal concrete and 16- inch - diameter steel pipe piles. If diesel - powered hammers are utilized, a hammer with a rated energy ranging between 35,000 and 70,000 ft -lbs. per blow with a ram weight of not less than 6,600 lbs. is recommended. The Delmag D30 -32 diesel hammer meets the aforementioned requirements. Should a steam- or air - powered hammer be used, it should have a minimum rated energy of 40,000 ft -lbs. per blow, but not more than 60,000 ft -lbs. per blow. For the recommended Raymond step - taper piles, the commonly used Vulcan No. 80C differential- acting hammer having a rated energy of 24,450 ft -lbs. per blow would be suitable, based on our previous experience with piles installed at J.C. Penney's and the existing mall area. All pile . driving equipment should be designed, constructed, and maintained in a manner suitable for the work to be performed on this project. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, the driving equipment is inadequate or deficient, he may recommend to the owner that it be removed from the job site. All costs for remobilizing, removing, or replacing such equipment should be at the Contractor's expense. The Contractor should furnish the manufacturer's specifications and catalog for the hammer proposed. As a minimum, the Contractor should furnish the information required on the Pile and Driving Equipment Data Sheet, shown in Table 1, seven days in advance of his scheduled pile driving. It has often been difficult to estimate the energy delivered by diesel hammers in the past. The Saximeter recently developed by Pile Dynamic, Inc., can be used to record hammer strokes and provide an estimate of the driving energy of diesel hammers. We recommend that a Saximeter be used should the Contractor select a diesel hammer. 15 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 In order to establish the driving criteria for test and production piles, the Wave Equation Analysis for pile driving is recommended. This method includes an evaluation of driving stresses so that an appropriate pile - driving hammer size can be selected to obtain the desired pile capacity without damage to the pile. This analysis also determines the ultimate pile capacity for a given driving resistance. Piles should be driven to at least twice the design load as determined by the Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving (WEAP). Results of wave equation analyses for the recommended 16.5 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete, and 16- inch - diameter by 3/8 -inch . wall steel pipe piles, 75 feet long and driven with a Delmag D30 -32 diesel hammer, are presented on Figures 10 and 11. Based on the results shown, the final driving resistance required for the 16.5 -inch concrete pile driven with a Delmag D30 -32 diesel hammer with a hammer stroke of about 7 feet (an average hammer energy of 45,500 ft -lbs. per blow) would be about 80 blows per foot Figure 10), for an assumed design load of 75 tons and a downdrag load of 80 tons. For an average hemmer energy of 49,000 ft -lbs. per blow, the required final driving resistance for the 16- inch - diameter steel pipe pile would be 84 blows per foot (Figure 11) under an assumed design load of 75 tons and a downdrag load of 60 tons. Wave equation analyses were not performed for Raymond step -taper piles in this study. Should Raymond step -taper piles be selected for foundation support, wave equation analyses should also be conducted prior to test pile driving. It is recommended that all piles be driven to the estimated pile tip elevations as shown in Section 6.3.4, and to the required final driving resistance as determined by the Wave Equation Analysis for the last foot. If the required final driving resistance is not reached near the estimated pile tip elevations, driving may be stopped for a minimum of 12 hours and then redriven until the specified driving resistance is achieved. As an alternate, the pile may be driven further to obtain the required final driving resistance. Should the required minimum driving resistance be 16 !! SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W- 4978 -01 achieved before piles reach the estimated tip penetrations, the piles should be driven to at least 1.5 times the specified driving resistance. The Wave Equation Analysis curves provided in this report are for design purposes only, using the assumed hammer and pile cushion data as shown on the figure. The data were selected based on our past: experience. Driving criteria for test and production piles should be determined by a similar Wave Equation Analysis using data for the actual hammer- cushion -pile combination to be used in driving the piles. 6.3.7 Estimated Settlements of Pile Foundations Based on the assumed design and downdrag loads, the estimated pile tip elevations, and the subsurface conditions encountered, total and differential settlements on the order of 0.4 -inch to 0.6 -inch are estimated. About 0.2 -inch to 0.3 -inch of the estimated settlements would be due to elastic compression of the piles. Since the piles are to be driven into very dense or hard soil strata, in our opinion, the settlements would occur almost simultaneously with load application. 6.3.8 Test Pile Program The previously estimated pile tip elevations were based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the current and previous borings. For the prestressed concrete pile, a predetermined length is generally required in order to minimize the chance of splicing or cutting off the pile. For the steel pipe and Raymond step -taper piles, it would also be helpful to have better defined pile lengths prior to ordering production piles. As presented in the previous Section 6.3.4, the estimated pile tip elevations may differ 15 to 20 feet within the proposed building area. Thus, prior to ordering production piles, we recommend that at least 7 test piles be driven to better define the length of piles required. The approximate locations of the 7 driven test piles are shown on Figure 12. Should the Additional Mall 17 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 Shops be constructed before the proposed Department Store No. 5 to the north, then two additional test piles should be driven, one in each north corner of the new structure area. The test piles may be driven within the closest pile cap in each case. In 1967, six pile pull -out tests and three pile compression load tests were performed on Raymond step -taper piles and steel pipe piles at the adjacent existing Southcenter building sites. We have used these load test results for our studies on pile penetrations and capacities. In our opinion, static pile load tests will not be necessary for this project. However, we recommend that dynamic measurements with the Goble pile analyzer be performed on the recommended driven test piles located at the two south corners of the building, and at the center of the north edge. Goble's pile driving analyzer should be used for the initial driving. The dynamic measurements should continue until the driving resistance reaches about 12 blows per inch or when the pile penetration is about 6 inches above the estimated pile tip elevation. The measurements should be taken again after pile driving has been discontinued, for a minimum of 12 hours. The results of the driving tests, the pile driving analyzer, and the Wave Equation Analysis of Pile Driving will be used to determine the pile lengths and develop the pile driving criteria for the production piles. Test piles can be used as production piles to carry design loads, provided that they meet the specified driving criteria. 6.3.9 Monitoring Pile Driving All pile driving should be monitored by taking a continuous driving . record for each pile. For this purpose, the Contractor should be required to paint a line across the pile in 1 -foot increments. During redrive, additional increments between the 1 -foot marks may be required. 18 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 6.5 Site Preparation and Earthwork We anticipate that the existing pavement will be removed at all footing and pile cap locations for pile installation. The existing pavement outside the footing areas may be left in place. We recommend that clean granular fill be used to raise the grades prior to casting the structural slab. All fill to be placed around the pile caps and grade beams, on -grade floors, pavements, or other areas where settlements are to be minimized, should be a structural fill. Based on our previous experience and the gradations obtained for several representative samples for other projects, most soils encountered at the project site would not be suitable for use as structural fill. Thus, most structural fill should be imported. Imported structural fill should consist of well - graded sand or sand and gravel. It should contain not more than 20 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve, 0.075 mm), based on the 3/4 -inch fraction, and should have a maximum particle size of 3 inches. It should be free of organic matter, and its moisture content should be within -3 percent, but not more than 2 percent above the optimum for compaction. The fines should be non - plastic. If fill is to be placed in wet weather no matter what time of year, structural fill should have a maximum limit of 5 percent non - plastic fines. Structural fill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to a dense, unyielding state, and to at least 95 percent of its Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM Designation: D- 1557 -70, Method C or D). The thickness of structural fill layers before compaction should not exceed 8 inches when heavy compaction equipment is used and 4 inches for hand - operated mechanical compactors. 20 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 6.6 Seismic Design Criteria 6.6.1 Characteristic Site Period It is anticipated that the seismic design of the facility will be based upon an equivalent static method of analysis as outlined in the Uniform Building Code. This particular procedure requires information on the characteristic site period of the underlying soils as input in this structural evaluation. It is recommended that a characteristic site period ranging from 0.8 to 1.2 seconds be used for the seismic design of the structure. Our evaluation of the characteristic site period is based upon the materials encountered in the previous borings drilled at and adjacent to the site, and from our experience of the engineering characteristics and geology of the anticipated underlying subsurface soils. This range of site period values was computed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code Standard #23 -1. As an alternative to the characteristic site period evaluation method, the structural design may be performed using an S- factor of 1.2 to account for site- structure resonance. This S- factor corresponds to S2 soil type as described in Section 2312 of the 1985 Uniform Building Code. 6.6.2 Ground Stability In our opinion, the medium dense to dense sands which underlie the site below elevation -10 feet (MSL) will not liquefy as a result of an earthquake similar in size to events typically used for the design of buildings in the Puget Sound area. However, the soft clayey silts and peats underlying the building site between elevations +10 and -10 may possess very little strength during earthquake ground shaking. Accordingly, piles which penetrate this stratum may undergo large lateral deformations during an earthquake. The piling for the structure should be designed to account for potentially large ground displacements within this layer of soft soils. This would necessarily require additional confining steel to be placed in 21 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 concrete piling to minimize potential spalling of the pile. It is recommended that lateral analyses be performed on the piles to determine the distribution of shear, moment, and deflection of the piles to facilitate the design of the foundation elements. The results of the lateral soil - structure resistance analyses of piles are presented in Section 6.3.5. 6.7 Drainage and Backfill Requirements Any parts of the structure which are to extend below the ground floor elevation such as an elevator shaft or small basement for mechanical or other utility rooms, should have a peripheral subdrain system to protect the walls and floors from moisture and to avoid the build -up of hydrostatic pressures. Our recommendations for a subdrainage system and backfilling for any depressed facility areas are presented on Figure 13. As shown, backfill material within 18 inches of any basement walls should consist of drainage sand and gravel which is hydraulically connected to the subdrain system. The recommended 6 -inch layer of washed pea gravel beneath floor slabs should also be hydraulically connected to the subdrain system. Subdrains beneath floors may be required if seepage is encountered during excavation. The need for these should be evaluated and determined during construction. All backfill within a minimum horizontal distance of 5 feet from walis should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 4 inches and compacted with a hand - operated vibrating plate. Heavy compactors should not be used near the walls to prevent increases in lateral pressure due to overcompaction. The remaining backfill should be placed in 6 -inch loose lifts and compacted with suitable compactors. The top 18 inches of the backfill should consist of relatively impervious materials to seal off, insofar as practical, surface water. Also, the final grade should have a gentle slope away from the wall to drain surface water. 22 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. W- 4978 -01 All backfill should be compacted to a density equal to at least 90 percent of the Modified Proctor Maximum dry density (ASTM Designation: D -1557) where some settlements are not objectionable and to at least 95 percent where settlements should be minimal. If footings and floors are located adjacent to the walls in backfill compacted to 95 percent minimum, total settlements approximately equal to 1/2 percent times the thickness of the fill could occur. If this settlement is excessive, floor slabs adjacent to the exterior walls should be provided with additional reinforcing steel. 6.8 Lateral Earth Pressures Against Permanent Structures The lateral earth pressure against a wall below grade would be dependent on the method of backfill placement, the type of backfill material, drainage provisions, and whether the wall is permitted to deflect laterally after or during placement of backfill. If the walls are allowed to deflect laterally or to rotate an amount equal to about 0.001 times the height of the wall, an active earth pressure condition would prevail and an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pounds Rer cubic foot (pcf) is recommended for the design of walls. For rigid walls that are restrained from deflecting at the top, an at -rest earth pressure condition would prevail and an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf is recommended. These pressures do not include the influence of groundwater. If drainage provisions are not included in the wall design, the lateral earth pressures should be increased to 80 pcf for the active condition and 90 pcf for the at -rest condition. The above values do not account for any surcharge loads near the walls, such as: heavy construction machinery, building equipment, or loads from footings placed in close proximity to the walls. An equivalent lateral pressure due to surcharge should be added to the recommended lateral earth pressures, where appropriate. 23 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 7.0 LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist. We further assume that the previous exploratory test borings are representative of subsurface conditions throughout the site; i.e., the subsurface conditions everywhere between and below the explorations are not significantly different from those disclosed by the explorations. If, during construction, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in the previous explorations are observed or appear to be present beneath excavations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. If there is a substantial lapse of time between the submission of this report and the start of work at the site, or if conditions have changed due to natural causes or construction operations at or adjacent to the site, we recommend that this report be reviewed to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations considering the changed conditions and time lapse. We recommend that we be retained to review those parts of the plans and specifications which pertain to earthwork and foundations to determine if they are consistent with our lecommendations. In addition, we recommend that we be retained to observe construction, particularly pile installation, earthwork, and other field observations as may be necessary. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Owner and Engineer in the design of the subject facility. It should be made available to prospective contractors and /or the Contractor for information on factual data only and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions, such as those interpreted from the boring logs presented and discussions of subsurface conditions included in this report. 24 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. W- 4978 -01 Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered and cannot be fully determined by merely taking soil samples from test borings. Such unexpected conditions may require that the Contractor make adjustments in his procedures to attain a properly constructed project. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. a 104f Ae`i d P. Miler, P.E. tive Vice President JW /lkd Enclosures: Table 1 Figures 1 through 13 Appendix A 25 SHANNON & WILSON. INC. TABLE 1 PILE AND DRIVING EQUIPMENT • DATA ControctNo: Structure Name and /or No • Project: county: HAMMER RAM ANVIL CAPBLOCK Pil• Driving Contractor or Subcontroctor• (Piles 111.1• ) Manufacturer: Model. Type • Serial No.• Rated Energy: Length al Stroke Explosive Force : (ref diesel h.uus?$) Rom Weight: Rom Length: Rom Cross Sectional Area: (true di.e.t Irwre.r.) Material: Are Thickness Modulus of Elasticity - E . (P.S.0 Coefficient of Restitution -t (For diesel ■s.►mer. ) Anvil Weight: Helmet Bonnet — 'Weight: PILE CAP Anvil Block Orivehea: CUSHION PILE Cushion Material: Are .t Thickness: Modulus of Elasticity - E ip S•l.) Coefficient of Restitution -e Type: Pile Size: Length (In Leads)... Diameter - Wall Thickness: Toper:. Moteriol: Weight /Ft.• Design Pile Capacity: (Tons) Description of Splice : • • Tip Treatment Description: 0 0 0 o° 0 tiS /7/ Proposed Department Store #5 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS ANDOVER BUSINESS PARK Pt $000 N 7600 5 j STRANDER BLVD. ) 0 500 1000 Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center Scale in Feet SITE LOCATION PLAN November 1988 W-4978-01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 1 = 16.5 -INCH OCTAGONAL CONCRETE PILE. FILE DATA MOD. or ELASTICITY = 5000.0 KSI MOMENT OF INERTIA = 4000.0 INk1:4 LENGTH BELOW Gu0I.IND = (.0.0 FT. EFFECTIVE PILE WIDTH= 33.017 IN. LOAD DATA APPLIED LOAD MOMENT ARM APPLIED MOMENT SOIL. DATA ZONE NO. 1 DEPTH FT. .0 15.0 40.0 5.0 KIPS .0 FT. _ .0 KIP--FT. TER7_AGEI [ CONSTANTS Kill NH L PSI PCI 0. 4.017 0. 1.00 0. 10.00 SURCHARGE, PSF = O. UNIT WT PC:F 120.0 105.0 60.0 COHESION F'SF O. 200. O. MIN. ALLOWED SAFETY FACTOR = .00 FIXED Et-ID MOMENT = -31.5 KIP- FT. CALCULATED RESULTS ANGLE OF INT. FRICTION P111, DEGREES 30.00 .00 32.00 NO. OF ITERATIONS = 0 PILE MOMENT SHEAR SPRING SOIL SOIL . SOIL .. SOIL DEPTH DEFL IN PILE IN PILE FORCE STRESS PP FS K -I K -F FT IN KIP-FT Y.I.P KIP KSF KSF • PSI PSI .0 .1.72 - 31.4.2. 5.01) .13 .03 .00 .00 0.- O. 3.0 .156 -19.05 4.49 .75 .09 1.00 9.99 144. 144. 6.0 .125 -(..63 3.49 1.23 .15 2.16 9.99 203. 283. 9.0 .090 4.0.9 2.21 1.34 .16 3.24 9.99 432. 432. 12.0 .057 0.69 .96 1.16 .14 4.32 9.99' 576: 576. 15.0 .031 9.02 .00 .76 .09 5.40 9.99 720. 720. 13.0 .013 0.67 -.49 .21 .03 2.51 9.99 242. 242. 21.0 .001 6.88 -.61 .02 .00 2.83 9.99 278. 278. 24.0 -.005 5.03 -.59 -.05 -.01 3.1.4 9.99 314. 314. 27.0 -.000 3.34 -.52 -.1 :19 -.I:11 3.46 9.99 .350. 350. 30.0 -.000 1.92 -.42 -.11:1 -.01 3.77 9.99 3:36. 386. 33.0 -.006 .81 -.32 -.09 -.01 4.09 9.99 422. 422. 36.0 - .1)04 -.01 -.24 -.07 -.01 4.40 9.99 451. 458. 39.0 -.002 .62 -.16 -.09 -.01 4.72 9.99 494. 494. 42.0 -.0C)1 -.47 -.02 -. 20 -.02 14.79 9.99 9090. 9090. 45.0 .000 -.72 .11 -.05 -.01 15.30 9.99 9450. 4450. 4 :1.0 .0(1(1 -.33 ..1 1 .05 05 .01. 15.'=x6 9.99 9010. 9210. G1.0 .000 -.0:': .0u: .05 .nt 16.55 9.99 10170. 101717. 54.0 .0017 .01 .02 .03 .00 17.14 9.99 10530. 10530. 57.0 .000 .01 .00 .01 .00 17.72 9.99 10090. 10890. 60.0 .000 .00 .00 .00 .001 12.31 9.99 11250. 11250. 0 Ft. 15 Ft. 40 Ft. 60 Ft. ASSUMPTIONS: Fixed Head Condition Medium dense to very stiff SILT & SAND Soft to medium stiff SILT & PEAT Medium to very dense, sandy GRAVEL 5.0 kips 'Yt = 120 pcf NH1 =4pci C =0 = 30° "Yt= 105pcf NH1 =1pci C = 200 psf sto =0 'Y' =60pcf NH1 =10pci C =0 • = 32° Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center LATERAL RESISTANCE OF 16.5 -INCH OCTAGONAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILE November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnicai Consultants FIG. 6 -n P 16.5 -INCH OCTAGONAL CONCRETE PILE PILE DATA MOD. OF ELASTICITY = 5000.0 KSI MOMENT OF INERTIA -- 4000.0 INI +'4 LENGTH BELOW GROUND = 60.0 FT. EFFECTIVE PILE WIDTH= 33.00 IN. LOAD DATA APPLIED LOAD MOMENT ARM APPLIED MOMENT SOIL DATA ZONE DEPTH NO. FT. 1 .0 2 15.0 3 40.0 SURCHARGE, PSF = CALCULATED RESULTS 5.0 KIPS .0 FT. .0 KIP -FT. TERZAGIII CONSTANTS KH1 NHL F'SI F'r i 0. 4.01:1 0. 1.00 0. 10.00 UNIT 11T I'CF 121:1.0 11:15.0 60.0 COHESION PSF- O. 200. 0. 0. MIN. ALLOWED SAFETY FACTOR = PILE MOMENT SHEAR SPRING SOIL DEPTH DEFL IN r'ILE IN PILE FORCE STRESS FT IN KIF' -FT KIP KIP KSF .0 .412 .00 5.00 .26 .06 3.0 .303 10.46 4.04 1.40 .17 6.0 .202 20.92 2.36 1.97 .24 9.0 .117 20.35 . 5 01.75 .21 12.0 .054 27.20 -.93 1.10 .13 15.0 .011 22.76 -1.66 .36 .04 10.0 -.014 17.23 -1.01 -.0' -.01 21.0 -.026 11.93 -1.64 -.25 -.03 24.0 -.029 7.30 -1.36 -.32 -.04 27.0 -.027 3.79 -1.03 -.33 -.04 30.0 -.021 1.20 -.72 -.29 -.04 33.0 -.015 -.51 -.46 -.23 36.0 - .00r:) -1.54 -.27 -.15 3 9.0 -.004 -2.11 -.11 -.15 42.0 -.001 -2.23 .11 -.30 45.0 .000 - 1.44 .28 -.03 40.0 .0001 -.52 .23 .13 51.0 .000 -.09 .1.1. .11 54.0 .000 .06 .02 . 06 57.0 .000 .04 -.01 .11.1 60.0 .0010 .00 .00 -.01 .00 ANGLE OF INT. FRICTIO.IN PHI, DEGREES 30.00 .00 32.00 SOIL SOIL SOIL PP FS K -•I I: -F KSF PSI PSI .00 .00 0. 0. 1.00 6.37 144. 144. 2.16 9.06 200.. 200. 3.24 9.99 432. 432. 4.32 9.99 576. 576. 5.40 9.99 720. 720. 2.51 9.99 242. 242. 2.83 9.99 272. 272. 3.14 9.99 314. 314. 3.46 9.99 350. 350. 3.77 9.99 306. 3''06. -.03 4 .0:+ 9.99 422. 422. -.02 4.40 9.99 452. 452. -.n2 4.72 9.99 494. 494. -.04 14.79 9.99 9090. 9090. .00 15.30 9.99 9450. 9450. .02 15.96 9.99 9010. 9010. .1)1. 16.55 9.99 10170. 10.1.70 . .01 17.14 9.99 10530. 10530. .011 17.72 9.99 10290. 10090. .o) 10.31 9.99 11250. 11250. 0 Ft. 15 Ft. 40 Ft. 60 Ft. ASSUMPTIONS: Free Head Condition Medium dense to very stiff SILT & SAND Soft to medium stiff SILT & PEAT Medium to very dense, sandy GRAVEL 5.0 kips Yt= 120pcf NH1 =4pci C = 0 (1h = 30° Yt = 105 pcf NH1 a1pci C = 200 psf =0 Y' = 60 pcf NH1 =10pci C =0 = 32° Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center LATERAL RESISTANCE OF 16.5 -INCH OCTAGONAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILE November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnlcal Consultants FIG. 7 16 -INCA 0.D.X3 /3 -INCH WALL STEEL PIPE PILE. _PILE DATA MOD. OF ELASTICITY = 29000.0 KM MOMENT OF INERTIA = 562.0 IN* *4 LENGTH BELOW GROUND = 60.0 FT. EFFECTIVE PILE WIDTH= 32.00 IN. LOAD DATA APPLIED LOAD = 5.0 KIPS MOMENT ARM = .0 FT. APPLIED MOMENT = .0 KIF' -FT. 5CtIL_ DATA TERZAGHI CONSTANTS UNIT ANGLE OF ZONE DEPTH KH1 NII1 WT COHESION INT. FRICTION NO. FT. PSI PCI PCF PSF PHI, DEGREES 1 .0 0. 4.00 120.0 0. 30.00 2 15.0 0. 1.00 105.0 200. .00 40.0 0. 10.00 60.0 '0. 32.00 SURCHARGE, F'SF = 0. MIN. ALLOWED SAFETY FACTOR = .00 FIXED END MOMENT = -29.0 KIP -FT. NI?. OF ITERATIONS = 0 CALCULATED RESULTS PILE MOMENT SHEAR SPRING SOIL SOIL. SOIL SOIL DEPTH DEFL IN PILE IN PILE FORCE STRESS PP FS K -I K -F FT IN KIP -FT KIP KIP KSF KSF 'PSI PSI .0 .190 - 29.03 5.00 .15 .04 .00 .00 0. O. 3.0 .171 -17.61 4.44 .02 .10 1.08 9.99 144: 144. 6.0 .134 -5.39 3.37 1.32 .16 2.16 9.99 203. 208. 9.0 .093 4.97 2.02 1.39 .17 3.24 9.99 432. 432. 12.0 .056 0.96 .76 1.13 .14 4.32 9.99 576. 576. 15.0 .020 9.55 -.15 .69 .09 5.40 9.99 720. 720. 18.0 .009 8.07 -.57 .17 .02 2.51 9.99 242. 242. 21.0 -.003 6.11 -.65 -.02 .00 2.03 9.99 278. 270. 24.0 -.008 4.21) -.59 -.09 -.01 3.14 9.99 314. 314. 27.0 -.010 2.56 -.49 -.12 -.01 3.46 9.99 350. 350. 30.0 -.009 1.27 -.37 -.12 -.02 3.77 9.93,9 3: ::6. 306. 33.0 -.007 .35 -.26 -.10 -.01 4.09 9.99 422. 422. 36.0 -.004 -.27 -.17 -.07 -.01 4.40 9.99 458. 458. 39.0 -.002 -.6 -.1(1 -.00 -.01 4.72 9.99 494. 494. 42.0 -.001 -.06 .02 -.15 -.02 14.79 9.99 9090. 9090. 45.0 .000 -.57 .11 -.02 .00 15.30 9.99l 9450.- 9450. 43.0 . 000 7.::";! . 09 05 .01 1.5. �)6 9.99 9810. 4310. 51.0 .000 -.03 .04 . f 1.s .01 16.55 :+.99 10170. 10170. 54.0 .000 .03 .01 .02 .00 17.14 9.99 10530. 10530. 57.0 .000 .01 .00 .00 .00 17.72 9.99 10:390. 10090. 60.0 .000 .00 .00 .00 .00 10.31 9.99 11250. 11250. 0 Ft. 15 Ft. 40 Ft. 60 Ft. ASSUMPTIONS: Fixed Head Condition Medium dense to very stiff SILT & SAND Soft to medium stiff SILT & PEAT Medium to very dense, sandy GRAVEL 5.0 kips Yt = 120 pcf NH1 = 4 pci C =0 Q = 30° Yt= 105pcf NH1 =1Pc' C = 200 psf =0 7' = 60 pcf NH1 =10pci C =0 = 32° Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center LATERAL RESISTANCE OF 16 -INCH O.D. x 3/8 -INCH WALL STEEL PIPE PILE November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnlcal Consultants FIG. 8 .. 'T1 CO 16 -INCH 0.D.X3 /3-INCI-I WALL STEEL PIPE PELF PILE DATA MOD. OF ELASTICITY = 29000.0 KSI MOMENT OF INERTIA = 562.0 INt$•4 LENGTH BELOW GROUND = 60.0 FT. EFFECTIVE PILE WIDTH= 32.01) IN. LOAD DATA APPLIED LOAD MOMENT ARM APPLIED MOMENT SOIL DATA ZONE DEPTH NO. FT. 1 .0 2 15.0 3 40.0 5.0 KIPS .0 FT. .0 KIP - -FT. TERZAGHI CONSTANTS KH1 NH1 PSI PCI •0. 4.00 O. 1.00 0. 10.110 UNIT WT COHESION PCF PSF 120.0 O. 105.1) 200. 60.0 O. SURCHARGE, PSF = 0. MIN. ALLOWED SAFETY FACTOR = CALCULATED RESULTS PILE MOMENT SHEAR SPRING SOIL DEPTH DEFL IN PILE IN PILE FORCE STRESS FT IN KIP -FT KIP KIP KSF .0 .451 .01) 5.00 .20 .07 3.0 .327 10.16 3.97 1.50 .19 6.0 .213 20.33 2.19 2.06 .26 9.0 .113 27.26 .27 1.77 12.0 .049 25.43 -1.12 1.01 .13 15.0 .005 20.56 -1.74 .23 .03 13.0 -.020 15.01 -1.70 -.15 -.02 21.0 -.031 9.90 -1.56 -.29 -.04 24.0 -.032 5.67 -1.23 -.35 -.04 27.0 -.028 2.49 -.89 -.34 -.04 30.0 -.021 .3.4 -.57 -.29 -.04 33.0 -.014 -.95 -.32 -.21 36.0 -.00:3 -1.59 -.15 -.14 39.0 -.004 -1.82 -.02 -.12 42.0 -.001 -1.71 .14 -.20 45.0 .000 -.99 .23 .02 43.0 .000 33 .16 .11 51.0 .000 -.01 .07 .f.►:; 54.0 .000 .06 .01 .03 57.0 .000 .03 -.01 .01.1 60.0 .000 .00 .00 -.01 .00 ANGLE or INT. FRICTION PHI, DEGREES 30.00 .00 32.00 SOIL SOIL SOIL PP FS K -I K -F KSF PSI PSI .00 .00 .0. 0. 1.05 5.76 144.. 144. 2.16 8.38. 20:3.- . 230. 3.24 9.99 .432.. . 432. 4.32 9.99 576. 576. 5.40 9.99 720. 720. 2.51 9.99 242. 242 . 2.05 9.99 270. 270 3.14 9.99 314. 314. 3.46 9.99 350. 350. 3.77 9.99 386.' 306. -.03 4.09 9.99 422. 422. -.02 4.40 9.99 453. 45:3. -.01 4.72 9.99 494. 494. -.03 14.79 9.99 90.90. 9090. .00 15.38 9.99 9450. 9450. .01 15'.96 9.99 9310. 9010. .01 16.55 9.99 10170. 10170. .00 17.14 9.99 11.1530. 10530. .00 17.72 9.99 10090. 10090. .00 10.31 9.99 11250. 11250. 0 Ft. 15 Ft. 40 Ft. 60 Ft. ASSUMPTIONS: Free Head Condition Medium dense to very stiff SILT & SAND Soft to medium stiff SILT & PEAT Medium to very dense, sandy GRAVEL 5.0 kips Yt = 120 pcf NH1 = 4 pci C =0 = 30° Yt = 105 pcf NH1 -1pci C = 200 psf ¢ =0 Y' = 60 pcf NH1 = 10 pci C =0 = 32° Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center LATERAL RESISTANCE OF 16 -INCH O.D. x 3/8 -INCH WALL STEEL PIPE PILE November 1988 ' W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 9 WAVE EQUATION ANALYSIS OF PILE DRIVING (REVISED WEAP MARCH 1981) SHANNON & WILSON. INC. PROJECT Southcenter Additional Mall Shops JOB NO W- 4978 -01 DATE 11 -30 -88 By JW Geotechnical Consultants PILE DATA CUSHION DATA TYPE 16.5" Octa. Prestressed Conc. HAMMER PILE LENGTH 75 ft. TYPE Al- Micarta TYPE Fir Plywood AREA OR SIZE 225 in2 K 24,200 Kips/in. K 1,500 Kips/in. Eras 0.8 Eros 0.5 HAMMER DATA SOIL DATA TYPE Delmaq D30 -32 ENERGY 31,000-49,000 ft. -kips EFFICIENCY RAM WEIGHT BASE WEIGHT POINT LOAD ( %) 400 350 300 Z O °"250 z 0 15 10 5 80% 6,600 lbs. 2,500 lbs. 50 OS 0.1 in. JS 0.1 - sec/ft. OP 0.15 in. JP 0.1 sec /ft. LEGEND ULTIMATE LOAD COMPRESSION STRESS TENSION STRESS RAM STROKE x 0 50 100 150 200 25 DRIVING RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT 5 6 4 2 0 0 W 0 G NW W � Z Q tc I FIG. 10 D -3 -81 TrT-- . i r jC" �.... X.,...' x:- ^ � +i�.�.��w - - -r �.��. �/"- .■��. TITS 1 " ....• .T ___ 0 50 100 150 200 25 DRIVING RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT 5 6 4 2 0 0 W 0 G NW W � Z Q tc I FIG. 10 D -3 -81 WAVE EQUATION ANALYSIS OF PILE DRIVING (REVISED WEAP MARCH 1981) PROJECT Southcenter Additional Mali Shops SHANNON & WILSON. INC. Geotachnicat Consultants JOB NO W-4978 -01 DATE 11-30 -88 BY JW PILE DATA TYPE 16" O.D X TR" Wall Steel Pipe LENGTH 75 ft. AREA OR SIZE 18.4 in2 HAMMER DATA TYPE Delma4 D30 -32 ENERGY 25,000- 53,500 EFFICIENCY 80% RAM WEIGHT 6,600 BASE WEIGHT 2,500 CUSHION DATA HAMMER TYPE AI- Micarta PILE TYPE None K 24,200 Kips/in. K Kips/in. Eros 0.8 Eros SOIL DATA OS 0.1 In JS 0.1 sac /ft. fL -kips OP 0.15 in. JP 0.1 sac /ft. LEGEND lbs. ULTIMATE LOAD lbs. COMPRESSION STRESS TENSION STRESS RAM STROKE POINT LOAD (%) 60 400 350 300 co 2 O 1"'250 0 Q 0 J W 1-200 1- J D 150 10 5 X 7 0 50 100 150 200 250 DRIVING RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT 300 5 40 30 20 10 0 350 I FIG. 11 D -3 -81 • A B•136 B-137® H-13 Existing J.C.Penney • H-14 Existina Glass Wall 1 H-7 27 Existing Glass Wall RECOMMENDED 1 DRIVEN TEST PILE LOCATIONS B • 41-13 4 — \--. Existing Parking 1.1 26 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS 0 60 120 25 11 11 I Scale in Feet 24 NOTE Base map provided by Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. C-5 C-3 C-2 25 Proposed 1 Department Store #5 a Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center TEST PILE LOCATION PLAN November 1988 W-4978-01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotectinical Consultants FIG. 12 PAVEMENT OR 18" IMPERVIOUS SOIL ON-SITE SOIL (SEE NOTE 2) SLOPED TO DRAIN AWAY FROM STRUCTURE EXCAVATION SLOPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY 12" MIN. COVER OF PEA GRAVEL (6" MIN. ON SIDES OF PIPE) 18 MIN. • .. • EXTERIOR WALL DAMP PROOFING DRAINAGE SAND & GRAVEL OR WASHED PEA GRAVEL WEEP HOLES (SEE NOTE 1) SUBDRAIN PIPE 4" WASHED PEA GRAVEL NOT TO SCALE MATERIALS DRAINAGE SAND & GRAVEL WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: PERCENT PASSING BY WEIGHT SIEVE SIZE 1 -1/2" 3/4" 1/4" NO. B NO. 30 NO. 50 NO. 100 (by vest slaving) 100 90 TO 100 75 TO 100 65 TO 92 20 TO 65 5 TO 20 0 TO 2 (non - plastic) SUBDRAIN PIPE 4" MINIMUM DIAMETER PERFORATED OR SLOTTED, CONCRETE, METAL, CEMENT OR PLASTIC PIPE; TIGHT JOINTS; SLOPED TO DRAIN (4"/100' MIN. SLOPE): PROVIDE CLEAN -OUTS. PERFORATED PIPE HOLES l3/18- TO 1/4" DIA.) TO BE IN LOWER HALF OF THE PIPE WITH LOWER QUARTER SEGMENT UNPERFORATED FOR WATER FLOW. SLOTTED PIPE TO HAVE 1/S'• MAXIMUM WIDTH SLOTS. •FLOOR SLAB VAPOR BARRIER .•• ....... • • •._ .18 " MIN. t • ,. � .4 6" MIN. NOTES 1. DRAINAGE GRAVEL BENEATH FLOOR SLAB SHOULD BE HYDRAULICALLY CONNECTED TO SUBDRAIN PIPE. USE OF 2" DIA. WEEP HOLES AS SHOWN IS ONE APPLICABLE METHOD. 2. IF WET CONDITIONS RENDER ON -SITE SOIL UNSUITABLE FOR COMPACTION.BACKFILL THE ZONE SHOWN ABOVE WITH FREE - DRAINING GRANULAR SOIL WITH NOT MORE THAN 5% (BY WEIGHT BASED ON MINUS 3/4" PORTION) PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (BY WET SIEVING) WITH NO PLASTIC FINES. 3. BACKFILL WITHIN 18" OF WALL SHOULD BE COMPACTED WITH HAND -OPERATED EQUIPMENT., HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR BACKFILL.AS SUCH EQUIPMENT OPERATED NEAR THE WALL COULD INCREASE LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES AND POSSIBLY DAMAGE THE WALL. 4. ALL BACKFILL SHOULD BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING 6" LOOSE THICKNESS AND DENSELY COMPACTED. BENEATH PAVED OR SIDEWALK AREAS, COMPACT TO AT LEAST 96% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY (ASTM: D1557, METHOD C). OTHERWISE COMPACT TO 90% MINIMUM. Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center SUBDRAINAGE & BACKFILLING November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 13 W- 4978 -01 APPENDIX A LOGS OF PREVIOUS BORINGS Boring B -136 and B -137 obtained from Shannon & Wilson, Inc. report dated August 5, 1966. Borings H -7, H -8, H -13, and H -14 obtained from Shannon & Wilson, Inc. report dated August 22, 1966. Borings C -1, C -2, C -3, C -4, and C -5 obtained from Shannon & Wilson, Inc. report dated August 29, 1988. SHANNON & WILSON. INC. GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SOIL DESCRIPTION Elev. 27.4' N 7830 E 2775 STANDARD PENETRATION 0_ (1,10 lb. weisht, 30 "drop) a N Blows per foot 50 100 7-7-66 23 30 39 V. stiff gray organic SILT with gray e1 and fine sand (FILL to 19 feet) V. soft brown -black fibrous PEAT . soft gray organic clayey SILT Medium to very dense. gray coarse to fine SAND (Boring continued on following page 0 1I 21 31 4110 51 61 71 812°0 9I 0 LEGEND Atterberc) limits:. I 2 "O.D. split spoon sample . LiQuid limit Natural water content II 3" 0.0. Shelby somple Plastic limit 2ig. 0.0. Shelby sample -Llf impervious seal C1 Piezometer tip P Sampler pushed * Sample not recovered Water level 50 100 % WATER CONTENT SHELL STRUCTURE SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING B-136 W 65-722C JULY 15, 1966 SHANNON Cc WILSON SOIL MECHANICS A rOUNDATION CNGINCCR: GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet 74 0 •w z LASSIFICATIO. SOIL DESCRIPT;ON Dense grey coarse to fine SAND Bottom of boring STANDAPD PEKE 1 FEAT 10N 2 (140lb.we;clnr, 30'drop) C Blows per foot 50 ISO LEGEND. I . 2" 0.0. split spoon sample. 1i 3" O.D. 5helbu sample II 2'4 0.0. 5helbu sample P Sampler pushed • • Sample not recovered - Water' level Atterber9 limits: -- LiQuid limit Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious seal Piezometer tip 0 ' 50 100 % WATER CONTENT SHELL STRUCTURE • SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING B -136 W 65 -722C JULY 15,1966 SHANNON & WILSON SOIL MECHANICS • FOUNDATION ENGINEERS Ctr A.)7L GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet 25 30 41 64 SOIL DESCRIPTION Elev. 30.1 N 8040 E 2775 V. stiff brown fine sandy SILT STANDARD PENETRATION °- (I40 lb. weicnr, 30" drop) N I Blows per foot 50 brown -gray organic clayey SILT (FILL to approximately 12 feet V. soft black PEAT V. soft • dark gray organic clayey SILT Medium to dense gray silty sandy GRAVEL 0 11 2Y 31 4110 51 6] 71 81 91 Bottom of boring 70 LEGEND Atterbercj limits: LiQuid limit 1 2 O.D. split spoon sample . Natural water content jj 3" O.D. 5helby sample Plastic limit TI gi- O.D. Shelby sample impervious sea SHELL STRUCTURE i..: Piezometer tip SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING P Sampler pushed CENTER ,K Sample not recovered. EO RING B -137 W 65 -722C JULY 15,1966 .Water level SHANNON & WILSON SOIL MECHANICS A FOUNDATION CNGINGGAII • 50 0 % WATER CONTENT 00 FIG. A-23 GROUND WATER LEVEL p DEPTH feet o o R. STANDARD ° `L I N Q SOIL DESCRIPTION Elev. 24.0' N 7940 E 2890 SAMPLE PENETRAT;ON (190 lb. weight, 30 "drop) Blows per foot • 50 IOC 12-6 -61 • 11.5 25.0 38.0 . Stiff brown silty CLAY with gravel (FILL) . 0 II I *b 112 20 3 114 � / /• 1 Layered, soft brown PEAT & gray organic SILT and CLAY • • Layered soft - medium gray organic clayey SILT 1[6 Dense- very dense gray SAND and fine GRAVEL with shell fragments . Bottom of hole at depth of 71' . _ i7 14 Q 1 9 I 18 1960 Iio ni70 N. NN N� \. �\ LEGEND spoon sample sample recovered Atterbercj limos: 0 % WATER CONTENT 100 J. C. PENNEY SHOPPING CENTER H -7 AUG.22,1966 & WILSON • FOUNDATION [NGINELRG I 2" O.D. split n 3" 0.D. Shelby II gig- O.D. Shelby P Sampler pushed * Sample not ..SZWaTe.r level sample �— LiQuid limit Natural water content Plastic Limit Impervious sent • Piezometer ti( SOUTHCENTER BORING W 65-722 -4 SHANNON *OIL •ECNANICY FIG. A -6 GROUND WATER LEVEL V DEPTH feet y SOIL DESCRIPTION Elev. 26.5 N 7915 E 30.10 w -J a 2 (1) 12-6 -61 14 29 46.5 60 Very stiff brown silty CLAY with gravel (FILL) Layered soft brown PEAT and gray organic SILT and CLAY Layered, medium gray clayey SILT and fine SAND Dense gray fine - medium SAND with gravel and shells Very dense gray SAND and GRAVEL with some cobbles and boulders (Boring continued on followingpage) _ 0 II STANDARD PENETRATioN (140 lb. weioht, 30 " drop) Blows per fco± 0 50 I2 I3 20 114 1[s I 117 Iio III 113 70 ■ LEGEND I 2.10.0. split spoon sample B 3" O.D. Shelby sample L 2I/a- 0.0. 5helby sample P Sampler pushed * Sample not recovered _SLWater. level Atterbercj limits: \LiQuid limit _ Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious sea' Piezometer tip 0 50 100 % WATER CONTENT J. C. PENNEY SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING H -8 W 65 -722-4 AUG.22,1966 SHANNON & WILSON BOIL MECHANICS i FOUNDATION CNGINCCR6 FIG. A?a I n l WATER ER �.JE!"Tn i : LEVEL I I I `eat 94 UNIFIED SUIT. CLASSIFIC /.TI; ;, SOIL 0 5C,;:r I ION Bottom of boring CAO :cc; 0 5'0 I►80 FIT I10 119 LEGENID I 2" 0.0. split spoon sample : 3" 0.0. Shelby sample Z.4" 0.0. 5helb j sample 2 Sam, ? :;:r pushed Sample not recovered ;F .S_Water level Atterber9 limits: limit Natural water content Plastic limit impervious seal Piezometer tip 103 0 50 % WATER CONTENT J. C. PENNEY SUUTHCcNTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING H -8 W65-722-4 AUG. 22,1966 :iANNON :s WILSON SOIL M:C$ANiC8 i FOUNDATION ENGINCCRS I00 FIG. A -71 GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet UNIFIED SOIL LASSIFICATION SOIL DESCRIPTION Elev. 27.5' SAMPLE STANDARD PEKE T RATION (IA0 lb. w2ioht, 3d drop) Blows .er foot 0 50 IGC • _ • • 14 20 28 33 38 55 'Dense brown silty clayey fine SAND with gravel (FILL) 0 II 1 12 1[3 ,20 4. 114 )15� 116 qp I I I - -J Medium gray layered organic SILT and fine SAND • Soft gray silty CLAY with organic material • Brown PEAT with clayey SILT layers . Medium gray silty organic CLAY' Medium gray silty fine SAND with organic material and silty CLAY layers 11 IT 18 5° I9 T 60 I" 70 I I I L— --- —4 . r Dense to very dense gray SAND with some gravel and shells (Boring continued on following page) [b l ik\ \` LEGEND spoon sample sample sample recovered Atterbercj limits: 50 0 % WATER CONTENT IOC J. C. PENNEY SHOPPING CENTER H -13 AUG.22,1966 & WILSON • FOUNDATION ENGINEERS I 2"0.D. split II 3" 0.D. 5helb4 214 0.0. 5helb4 P Sampler pushed * Sample not .SL_Water level N uid limit �"- a �-- Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious seal Piezometer tip • SOUTHCENTER . BORING W 65 -722 -4 SHANNON *OIL MECHANIC• F1G.A -8a 91.5 Bottom of boring J L 1) 1'3 I15 I� (ISO CIC�.11 �U. / JJ VDU ;J / a ows JC. ;cc. -# 50 Ir r .U� LEGEND I n P 2"0.D. split spoon sample 3" 0.0. 5helb9 sample 214.0.D. 5helb4 sample Sampler pushed Sample not recovered .2 Water level Atterber9 limits: ►- --cct— LiQuid limit Natural water content �L P;cs�ic Iimit • Impervious seal .1. C. ?EN NZY Piezometer. tip . SOUTHCEN -ER S-OPPJ G CEO'; Er: BORING H -13 W65-722-4 A UG. Z2,1963 SHANNON r: WILSON SOIL MECHANICS & FOUNDATION CNCINCGAZ 0 50 IC,C WATER C3 \TENT F1G.A -8'. GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet lcUNIFIED SOIL LASSIFICATION SOIL DESCRIPTION' Elev. 27.5' N 7715 E nap SAMPLE I STANDARD PENETRATION (Ig0 lb. u:ei9ht, 30"d:op) Blows per foot 0 50 I0� _ • • • • 14 25 28 31.5 4s 57 62 Very stiff gray -brown silty sandy CLAY (FILL) irII 113 IA 1 0 II I2 I0 13 T20 4 15 6 30 7 18 1 I f /. f 1 I- Loose- medium gray fine sandy SILT • • Soft gray organic CLAY Medium PEAT 1 I Loose- medium brown silty fine SAND 19 Do + f 4 Soft dark gray clayey organic SILT i 50 I12 60 70 Soft dark gray PEAT and peaty CLAY Medium gray silty organic CLAY (Boring continued on following page) _ LEGEND spoon sample sample recovered Atterberc) limits: limit 0 % WATER CONTENT 10` J.C. PENNEY . SHOPPING CENTER H -14 AUG.22,1966 & WILSON • FOUNDATION LNGIN[[A• I 2"0.0. split n 3" O.D. 5helby Zl Z O.D. 5helb4 P Sampler pushed * Sample not _Water level sample _ L'quid - Natural water content Plastic lirnit 1mpervi0US seal Piezometer tip SOUTHCENTER BORING W 65-722-4 SHANNON SOIL •[CNANIC• FIG. A 9a GROUND \VAT ER LEVEL DEPTH f eet UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATIO;■ SOIL DESCRIPTION 71 88 106 121.5 Dense gray gravelly medium - course SAND Dense gray silty fine SAND Very stiff gray clayey SILT, some organic material Layered, medium to silty fine SAND and SILT, some organic occasional gravel (Boring LEGEND I 2"0.D. split spoon sample Air 3" O.D. Shelby sample 2▪ '4. O.D. Shelby somple P Sampler pushed * Sample not recovered Water• level dense gray stiff clayey material, L4.1 J N S iANJARD P=I i KAi;0 >: (140 ;b.w2ior,;, 117 I80 119 Ito 90 121 122 123 HO I24 P20 123, ElGws scr J .0 TOO± 100 130 I* 1 I26 continued on following page) 140 0 Atterber9 limits: -4--- LiQuid limit Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious seal Piezometer tip 1 ' k 50 % WATER CONTENT J. C. PENNEY SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING H-14 W 65 -722-4 AUG. 22, ISOG SHANNON V:il ON SOIL MECHANICS IL FC, .t`OATION ENGINCGAG 103 F1G.A -91 � ' I i I` �). Y y• I I I i )1° lI _J i i I ► . I 130 I* 1 I26 continued on following page) 140 0 Atterber9 limits: -4--- LiQuid limit Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious seal Piezometer tip 1 ' k 50 % WATER CONTENT J. C. PENNEY SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER BORING H-14 W 65 -722-4 AUG. 22, ISOG SHANNON V:il ON SOIL MECHANICS IL FC, .t`OATION ENGINCGAG 103 F1G.A -91 GROUND WATER LEVEL DEPTH feet 0 0 w CLASSIFICATIO;; SOIL DESCRIPTION 5TAN:.iArkG r'�:�.C. r/.••, lJ:. • N Cows tee, f cs± 0 50 106 148 164 176 Very dense fine SAND with GRAVEL • Hard reddish brown SILT Bottom of boring 127 150 I28 160 I29 170 I301 f 100/4 ... 45/6, 55/2.5+ 64/6, 37/3 -+.; LEGEND I .2"0.0. split spoon sample 3" 0.0. Shelby sample 21/a O.D. Shelby sample 2 Sampler pushed Sample not recovered 77 Water level Atterbercj limits: -- LiQuid limit Natural water content Plastic Ijmit Impervious seal t Piezometer tip 0 50 103 % WATER CONTENT J. C. PZ.NNZY SOUTHCFNTZR Si-iOPP;NG CENTER vvu'L H-14 W 65-722-4 AUG. 22, IS66 SHANNON Z. V.'USON SOIL MCC$ANICS O FOUNDATION CNGINCCFC FIG.A -9c SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 27.1 ft• 0 N W JQ Oc O~ cc C7 � 1 w O 0 Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) A Blows per toot 21 411 Asphalt at surface, underlaid by grovel. l= Dense to medium dense, blue -grey to brown. slightly gravelly fine ,SAND end SILT, 'mist to dry with organics end Iron oxide stains. ri (FILL) Stiff to medium stiff, layered blue-grey clayey SILT and very dark brown FEAT, moist 4= to wt. with some fine sand and organics. 5I 14 31 Soft. dark gray, clayey SILT, moist to vet, with shells. Silt of low plasticity and 71 1 livery texture. r 3S Very loose, dark grey, slightly clayey, silt` EU ifine SAND. molst 4. vet with some flee r 4B gravel and shells. 91 Medium dense, dark gray, slightly silty to silty, fine to course sandy. fine GRAVEL. 1D= wt. 5D Dense, dark gray, medium to course sandy, 11= fine to coarse GRAVEL, vet with some silt. 1 63 131 Layered, dark gray to orange-brown. herd fine to coarse sandy SILT, and very dense, medium 14= to coarse SAND end RAVEL, dry to moist, v1th organics and gravel. Silt forming pockets. 15= Daring Completed 6 -27 -88 Dottom of Boring v 16= 17= 162 19= 10= 98 11= D 0 rn 0 • • • 3• 40 5D 6 711 • • • • • so 9D 110 = 2' O.D. split spoon sample II 3" O.D. thin -wall sample *Sample not recovered Att.rberg Limits: �--1�- Liquid limit LEGEND Natural water content Plastic limit Impervious seal Water level Piezom•ter tip P Sample pushed NOTE; The ilication lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. • • • • • 5. 5D/ 4' • iDA /4'.... • I 55/ 6'• • SS/ 6' • 0 1D 4,11 • % Water content PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE SOUTH CENTER SHOPPING CENTE LOG OF BORING C -1 AUG. 1988 64977 -D1 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. G sotechnicsl Consultants SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 24.9 1?.?. -t. 4 co w -i c. u, 0 g GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30– drop) A Blows per foot • • • Asphalt at surface, underlaid by gr avel. Very stiff, gray to orange-brovn, slightly clayey, fine sandy SILT, moist with r an some coarse gravel rid organics. Clay forming In 2 IT 21 31 14 41 52: 25 61 71 35 61 5:: 45 10T 111 121 11 141 71 1S1 76 16T 17= 18= 19= 20= 44 i cn During Drilling 1 �D !9 b m to to .. . • .. . . . ... .. - . .. • • ___ __._________..__________. • . • • • • • • . . . Layered, soft gray-brown, clayey SILT and medium stiff, dark brown to black, laminated silty PERT, pots+. .. • 215.7—°' Soft to very soft, brown to blue-gray, stratIft • cf clayey SILT. moist to vet, silt of I ow p 1 art 1 city and I !very texture. Medium dans. blue-gray, fine to coarse sandy fine GRAVEL, vet. - • • . Dense to very dense. blue-gray slightly silty medium to coarse sandy fine GRAVEL, vet, with some organics. • — . . ... • • • • . • ' • • 10/ II" ."'-'4 Very dense.. blue gray silty fine gravelly fine to medium SAND, moist to wet with some 1 organics. r Hard, distorted laminated layers of gray and brown SILT, dry, with a trace of gravel and organics. Soil breaks along fissures. Boring continued next page ;- • 501 6" ...-ce... I I • SA/ 4 —r ---r • 100150..—m • SA/ 61' • LEGEND 0 22 40 60 • I; Water content 1 2- O.D. split spoon sample * Impervious seal n 3- O.D. thin-wall sample *Santo° not recovered Atterberg Limits: .2 Water level -. I Piezometer tip P Semple pushed PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE :IS SOUTH CENTER SHOPPING CENTER 1--ii--1-*— Liquid limit \\..--___ Natural water content Plastic limit • LOG OF BORING C-2 RUC. 1988 V4977-BI NOTE; The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. SHANNON & WILSON. INC. G•otechnical Consultants FIG. A-2 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 24.9 ft. to W -A w QQ 3 N GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30• drop) Blows per foot D 41 fill Hard, dim-tor-tad 1•win•t•d layers of grey end brown SILT, dry wlth • • trace of gravel end 1 01-911111 CS. So1I breaks •long flisuras. 1 111 r113 21= 1111 1111 131- 140 151 161 171 180 190 220 • 83/ 8' Sottos of Boring 8oring Cowpl.t.d 6 -36-88 �.........'. --�— } { • f 1 1 i LEGEND Impervious seal 2 W't "' ° "', ' Pie:om•ter tip P Sample pushed approximate boundaries may be gradual • 20 41 51 • x Water content 12•' O.D. split spoon sample f 1I 3'. O.D. thin -wall sample *Sample not recovered Att•rb•rg Limits: • Liquid limit PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE * SOUTH CENTER SHOPPING CENT 2-, LOG OF BORING C -2 RUC. 1988 84977 -11 1- -4111-- -( —.— \\-- Natural water oor►tsnt Plastic limit NOTE; The ification lines represent the between soil types and the transition i SHANNON & WILSON, INC.1 I G•ot•chnical Consultants FIG.A -2a SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Z4 9 . ft. J 0 Q N GROUND WATER DEPTH, h. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) A Blows per foot 0 40 88 Asphalt at surface, under l a 1 d by gravel. Layered. dense, blue-grey, silty fin. SAND, and very stiff yellow - brown, fin. sandy SILT4 moist, to dry with fine grovel and organics. 11 2 • _I Medium stiff, gray to brown. layered fine sandy SILT, and PERT, moist, with some clay. Silt of low plasticity and livery texture. 41 Si ily 64.1 ._._. _I 144.9 • • • • Medium dense. gray, fine *0 coarse sandy. fine to coarse RAVEL, wet with some silt. 81 92 During Drilling a a :::•.::::, . • Dense to very dense, blue -gray, fine to coarse sandy, fin. RAVEL. vet, with some slit. 1D= 111 ,SS 121 • • Medium dens., gray, silty fine SAND, v.t, with some organics. Very dens., gray to yellow - brown. silty fin. SAID, wet with some coarse gravel and Iron oxide stains. Silt forming In pockets. 81 131 14= 71 1S= 16= 17Z 18x 19= • • 841 11' "•i''' sv .se. .. -.- . Nord, gray to brown. distorted laminated layers of fine sandy SILT. dry with some silt in pockets. ! • .. at .4m _ l air.. 1.-its..; • 115/6" ' .. r2 ` Dottom of Boring Daring Completed 7 -1 -88 93 LEGEND Impervious seal 2 Water Iev.I Piezom•t•r tip P Sample pushed approximate boundaries may be graduaL li 21 40 8A • % Water content = 2" O.D. split spoon sample c II 3•• 0.D. thin-wall sample *Sample not recovered Att•rb•rg Limits: 1- -0--1•— Liquid limit \\.--__. Natural water content Plastic limit NOTE; The stratification lines represent the between soil types and the transition PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE 4 2 - SOUTH CENTER SHOPPING CENTE LOG OF BORING C -3 AUG 1980 V4977 -81 SHANNON a WILSON. INC. G•otechnical Consultants 1 FIG. A -3 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 27-0 ft. in iii ..1 ei. 0 g GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. w•ight, 30" drop) A Blows per foot 0 22 40 6B Asphalt at surface, underlaid by gravel. Layered blue-grey to brown, medium dense, silty fine SPHD, and stiff to vary stiff, sandy 51LT to clayey 5ILT, dry to moist, with organics and silt forming In pockets. (FILL) IT 14 ST 4.]: gIIP ri 71 35 tri 40 91 IBI • • • _ _______ _ _ . • • • . . . .. ... . .... • • . . • During Drilling Ica 7 -5 -88 m to m to m to '�� m . . ... .. .. . . . . ----- Medium stiff, blue-grey to brown, slightly clayey SILT, at with organics and shells. Silt of low plasticity end livery texture. - Very soft. blue-gray to brown. clayey-5IL7 to silty-CLAY, with shells and organics. Medium dense. gray medium to coarse sandy fine GRAVEL, wet with some shells, and a trace of silt. • .. .. . .. • - • • .... . Dense, gray, medium to coarse sandy fine GRAVEL, wet with some silt end shells. 11T 12T 131 65 141 15 75 16= 17= 19= 97.6 20= • 41 74/1r- --bk" Very dense. gray, medium to Corse sandy fine GRAVEL. wet with some silt and organics. • 50/2' • ---1"- Nerd, orange-brown. fine sandy SILT. dry lo moist, with a trace of fine gravel and organics. Boring Completed 6-29-88 IBB/4"--J'''' • • ion-. • —b- Beim of Oaring LEGEND 12 413- bXI • % Water content I 2.7 0.0. split spoon sample 11 3" 0.0. thin-wall sample *Sample not recovered Atterberg Limits: A Impervious seal 2 Water level Piezom•ter tip P Sample pushed PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE #- SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER • 1^-1.---1-o— Liquid limit \\-- Natural water content Plastic limit NOTE; The stratification lines represent th• approximate boundaries between soil types and th• transition may be graduaL 1 LOG OF BORING C-4 AUG 1988 V4977 -B1 SHANNON & WILSON, INC.] G•otechnical Consultants FIG. A-4 SO I L DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 27.2 ft. En IL ..I n. 2 0 g GROUND WATER DEPTH, h. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) A Blows per foot 0 2D 42 62 Asphalt al surface, underlaid by gravel. Layered, medium dens., silty brovn to gray, s fin. SAND, and very stiff, clayey 51L7, with some coarse sand and fine gravel. Moist to dry. WILL) 11 2:E 3:E le 4I SZE 61 3D 7:E 6-1 42 a llia 111 121 62 13= li& 72 15= 16 17= le= 92 19= 97.5 ........ ' II • _ _______. _. .. .• • • . 0 . ------- --------•-• •••• • . lethe 83.5 • - Soft. layered, blue-grey to dark brovn clayey SILT. and SILTY-PEAT. moist to dry. Vlih some gravel and organics. Medium stiff. grey. clayey SILT. with some fine sand and graveh moist, with mrgancts and hells. During Drilling to b m to to • . . . . .. • . . . .. . . Medium dense to dens., grey, fine to coarse sandy, coarse GRAVEL, wei with some silt and • trace of shells. • • • • . • . . . . .. . . .... • Vert; dense brown-gray, sli ghtly silty, fine to medium SAND, aalsi. • • • sof 4 so/ •___co.. 4• a. • • ....lb. 4 I Hard, blue-gray lo yellow-brown, fine to medium sandy SILL moist to dry, with some fine gravel. • • . ssi • • so .1:2.. I • • sof 4. ....Ea. I • • SA/ 4 ' SD/12'• ---1:6" I • I Hard, black. fine sandy, clayey S ILT. dry, poor grade lignite. (smell purple lenses. of volcanic ash1. natio.. of Daring - Completed 7-5-Be LEGEND . ‘11 ilif 1 V0.0. Impervious • • % Water content split spoon sample jr seal n 3” O.D. thin-wall sample 12 Water level Piezom•ter tip •Sample not recovered P Sample pushed Atterberg Limits: I-0-4-0— Liquid limit \\._—. Natural water content Plastic limit NOTE; Th• stratification lines represent th• approximate boundaries between soil typos and the transition may be gradual PROPOSED DEPARTMENT STORE * " SOUTH CENTER SHOPP ING CENTE" LOG OF BOR ING C-5 AUG. 19015 V4977-21 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. G•otechnical Consultants ' FIG. A-5 11 • CITyROFE,,,_ The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc. PFR"'�T CENTER 2® ®1 = VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Jack Pace City of Tukwila Department of Planning 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SOUTHCENTER MALL SEPA APPLICATION Dear Jack: June 15, 2001 Stephen G. Moluse, A. S. L. A. Director of Site Planning smoluse@rejacobsgroup.com Direct Dial No. (440) 808 -7505 FAX: (440) 808 -6907 Attached for your review and approval is our SEPA application and supporting documentation for the demolition of the existing 26,877 SF cinema and the development of a single, 9,500 SF sit -down restaurant at the corner of Tukwila and Southcenter Parkways. It is our intention to submit an application for design review for the proposed restaurant within the next 60 to 90 days and would hope to have completed the environment review of this project prior to that time. In support of this application, we are providing the following materials for your review and consideration: • Complete Application Checklist • 6 copies of Traffic Impact Analysis for Southcenter Mall restaurant dated 5/31/01 (Transpo Group) • 6 copies of the SEPA Environmental Review Application, including Site Plans • 6 copies SEPA Environmental Checklist and $325.00 fee • Public Notice materials, including King County Assessors Map and 2 sets of mailing labels for all properties within 500 FT of the subject property • Title Report • 6 copies of Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Please advise if there is any additional information that we can supply to support this application. SGM:Ime Enclosure cc: T. P. Schmitz, w/o encl. Mikel Hansen, w/o encl. Very truly yours. THE ' CHARD E. JACOBS GROUP, INC. Stephen G. Moluse Director of Site Planning 25425 Center Ridge Road • Cleveland, Ohio 44145 -4122 Phone: 440 - 871 -4800 • Web site: www.REJacobsGroup.com • CITY OF TUKWILA SEPA Department of Community Development ENVIRONMENTAL Tel phone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431-3665 Cm 11 OC .1tW1 q REVIEW E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 4 trr14 4- -(*y r -11 rat-te 'rfi J- 4 b Pt-tra< LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL , NUMBERS. t Quarter: Section: 9,1.! Township: �i� Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. eL,51-ztrf tA--;41 CLA., Name: Si i ' 0 _ sift / %: _, ' a'__ _ 1l-�1 Address: Vol �i. c�L �v� .� et V ,uy 0..* 4-?i* L i. � i1%. ytj 4444-v Pone: 440- �$- Z JD S FAX: 3 (i O ,3 $ — 7 Signal Date: Lellt01 G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA Planner: File Number: O 1 — Q / Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 4 trr14 4- -(*y r -11 rat-te 'rfi J- 4 b Pt-tra< LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL , NUMBERS. t Quarter: Section: 9,1.! Township: �i� Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. eL,51-ztrf tA--;41 CLA., Name: Si i ' 0 _ sift / %: _, ' a'__ _ 1l-�1 Address: Vol �i. c�L �v� .� et V ,uy 0..* 4-?i* L i. � i1%. ytj 4444-v Pone: 440- �$- Z JD S FAX: 3 (i O ,3 $ — 7 Signal Date: Lellt01 G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department ojCommunity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan cr,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersi ned being dul sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I t e current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real �( property, located at (2' 1,4' �1Lrt7�QiG�',W1(.r+ for the purpose of applicauon review, for the limit necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Toss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non- responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at tAr j (city), (state), on JCM- "7• 2,00) , STVP14a &4 GF. 1140l -' Vn re N me v 4IQOu to. 254'7:5 'rent es I t (Ald'dress) �ICI�iNt rtlaVa e 1 ��C 4 4 t 4 440 Bow= Ids (Phon mber) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me 6%7 P A./ 11401-26(.:r L& to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that,she signed the same as aher voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 7 DAY OF NOTARY 'PUBLIC in and for the State of WashingtuND residing at K MORAN My Commission expires on 11 My Madam �� 10, 2006 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted in a later timely manner for use at the Public Hearing (e.g., revised colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED, TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. RECEIVED Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206- 01/4701ID -tment of Community Development and 206 - 433 -0179 Department of Public Works. JUN 1 $ 2001 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLFr ERMIT CENTER In form ationt•Requi ed: ;,11%fay'be Waived .intunusual.: ` ;:: up.approval of both Public Works and • : case's on PlannntngY -- " .P3 _ • a b •nformation .Waived 'PbGVk %Ping Office Use Only Comments &=Condittons r APPLICATION FORMS: 1. Application Checklist: one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Four (4) copies of supporting studies with original signatures and license stamp as needed. 3. Complete Application Packet: Six (6) copies of application form and full sized plans, one set of all plans reduced to 8.5" by 11" (High Quality Photo' Reduction) and other materials and information as specifically listed in Project Description and Analysis, Site Plans, Landscape Plan and Elevations. 4. SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) and fee ($325). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 5. King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject lot. SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. 6. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. See Public Notice Materials. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks must be included). • . SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. A 4' x'4' Public Notice Board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. PROPERTY INFORMATION ' /7 . Vicinity Map with site location. f' 8. Surrounding Land Use Map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 foot radius from the lot's_ property lines. /9. Title Report -- Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances. 10. Lot lines for 300 ft. from the site's property lines including right -of -ways. ~4011W440416,10_ v V G: vAPPHAN U.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Southcenter Mall - Restaurant /Retail Re- Development Southcenter Joint Venture Southcenter Mall 633 Southcenter Parkway 2. Name of Applicant: Agency Comments RECENED CITY OF'TUKWIL.A JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER Tukwila, Washington 3. Date checklist prepared: 1 -10 -01 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start of Construction Spring 2002 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. This project contemplates the development of three (3) out- parcel buildings which will be constructed as market conditions permit. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None at this time, however it is likely that prospective tenants will undertake Phase I Environmental Reviews of the property prior to entering into a ground lease. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. G: UPPHANLL.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 1 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 1. Design Review through Tukwila Board of Architecture Review will be required. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Demolition of existing 26,877 SF Cinema and replacing with a single ±9,500 SF sit -down restaurant. 11 Location of the proposal, Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Southcenter Mall. See attached Site Plan and Vicinity Map. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Agency Comments 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Fully developed with high density retail buildings and parking. The portion of property to be re- developed is 100% building or parking lot area. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attached Sub - surface Geotechnical Report dated Nnvemher 1998. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. See attached Sub - surface Geotechnical Report. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor adjustment of finish pavement elevations to accommodate the proposed finished floor elevations. No major cut /fill expected. G:\APPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 3 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The amount of impervious area will be REDUCED due to increase in landscape area and net reduction of building area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction sequencing will minimize exposure of subgrade and removal of pavement in building areas. Construction access roadways will be designed to minimize tracking of soil & earth off -site. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No significant change in the type or quantity of emissions is anticipated as a result of this project.. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. 4 G: APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust control measures will be implemented during demolition and construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. {. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 5 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No change from existing condition. G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No change from existing condition. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: There will be no increase in surface water runoff. G.\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fu-, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None, however additional landscape planting will be proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscape planting will be compatible with existing landscape planting on -site. G: V .PPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 8 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Nnne 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Same as existing condition. G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 9 Please respond to al questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: All building HVAC equipment will be installed in accordance with the Washington State Energy Code Requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 10 i i Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Automobile traffic noise. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary construction noise during daytime work hours. Traffic noise consistent with existing conditions. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Commercial Retail, b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. G: APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 11 Please respond to al 1 questions. Use separate sheets as neces iy. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. See attached Site Plan. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Existing Cinema building will be demolished to permit development of new Restaurant /Retail use e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial CP District {. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? • Tukwila Urban Center Zone g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. G: APPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 12 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? New employees: 15 , No residential proposed. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N.A. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. 13 G:IAPPHAN\LANDUS E. APP\SEPAAP P. DOC. 06/16/00 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Proposed out - parcel development shall be single -story building with exterior materials compatible with existing Shopping Center construction. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None, however the overall aesthetic appearance will be improved by the addition of-foundation landscape planting and due to the fact that the two -story Cinema building will be replaced by a smaller structure. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Same as 'b' above. G:\ APPHAN \L.ANDUSE.APP'SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 14 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No change from existing condition. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A G 1 APPHAN \L.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 15 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N.A. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. G: V .PPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 16 Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See attached Site Plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See attached Parking Summary. (Site Plan) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. G: WPPHANLL.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 17 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See attached traffic memorandum dated May 25, 200L g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None required_ 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increased demand on public services will result. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N.A. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: refuse service system other: Private refuse service will be used. G:\APPHANU.ANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 septic 18 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All required utilities are in place. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is re, 'n: on the • ts mak its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/ 16/00 19 Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: G : \A P P HAN\LA ND U S E. AP P\S E P AAP P. DOC. 06/16/00 20 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands ?, Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Agency Comments G 1APPHANU.ANDU SE. APPLSEPAAP P. DOC. 06/16/00 21 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. G:IAPPHANU.ANDUSE. APP\SEP AAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 22 Agency Comments City of Tukwi•SA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA Date: lie f'• r d/ JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CEN—ER 0v4r7174444170 Applicant Name: •/ ST e /<-401-0 6. Street Address: City, State, Zip: 141WI e / 44/4 Telephone: �f 4 " �� - l � DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. May 24, 2001 1 City of Tukwila* Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and sche duled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 COO .ntinue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - ntinue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. (NO)ontinue • to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5-0 (YE)Continue to Question 5-0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18 :45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ntinue to Question 6-0 , YES - Continue to Question 6-0 May 24, 2001 2 City of Tukwila le Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete (YES)- Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answe r. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question.. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 ntinue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle a a ' ropriate response. ntinue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1-4 Part B (continued) May 24, 2001 3 City of Tukwila A Screening Checklist 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2-0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self- porting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast -het of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) May 24, 2001 4 City of Tukwila n Screening Checklist Part D: Ple ase review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted-width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 34 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 May 24, 2001 5 • City of Tukwila•A Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) May 24, 2001 6 Southcenter Mall Site Location Map amish in0)1111111k 1101.101111111 grk, MIA IEFIffm ituk2411 mu Amur a .,1 imasumumuir IMO � L Mgt �> 111k4`1 SW 27th St Southcetnter Mell SW41stSt rillia +Seattle -Tec Streets98 0 mi 0.5 1 REINED 2 2.5 CITY OF TUKWILA Copyright O 1988 -1997, Microsoft Corporation and/or its suppliers. NI rights reserved. Please visit our web site at http'1 /maps.expedia.com. JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER Page 1 RECEI!/ED Cam' OF TUKWILq JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER -ZIBON MARCHE PARCEL ce ft 14.624 ,ACRES 1388 CARS w a h \ w 0 w Transportation and Traffic Engineerin PLANNING • DESIG MEMORANDUM 1 RECEIVED The CITY OF TUKWILA Transpo JUN 1 8 2001 Group PERMIT CENTER TO: Jill Mosqueda & Brian Shelton DATE: May 31, 2001 4•0 troy . o1' Cc: Steve Moluse c��` N �OQ�; The Richard E. Jacobs Group, Inc w FROM: ' Dan McKinney, Jr. yr', The Transpo Group, Inc. City of Tukwila, Public Works TG: 01054.00 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE SOUTHCENTER MALL IKAs% RESTAURANT The Transpo Group has been retained by The Richard E. Jacobs Group to conduct a traffic study for the proposed Southcenter Mall Restaurant in the City of Tukwila. The purpose of this memo is to provide you with the general project description, trip generation characteristics, and traffic safety analysis for the proposed project as defined in our May 14, 2001 conference call. Project Description The proposed project would develop a freestanding restaurant that would replace the existing Southcenter Theater located on the northwest corner of the Southcenter Mall site. The proposed restaurant would have a total of 9,500 gross square feet (gsf) with a seating capacity of approximately 290. Access and drive aisles for the Southcenter Mall would remain unchanged however, the parking lot in the immediate area of the restaurants would be slightly reconfigured due to the change in building size and landscape requirements. A portion of the preliminary site plan is attached to this memo to show the proposed restaurant location. Trip Generation The PM peak hour trip generation estimate for the proposed development is based on data found in ITE's Trip Generation. The proposed restaurant is classified as a High- Turnover Sit Down Restaurant and has a PM peak hour trip generation rate of 10.86 trips per 1000 gsf. Internally captured vehicle trips are trips that are made because of travel from one land use to another, on -site. This would include all trips between the proposed restaurants and all of the Southcenter Mall uses including the out pads that are located on -site. The internal The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland, Washington 98034 -7120 FAX: 425/825 -8434 425/821 -3665 • • Jill Mosqueda Brian Shelton May 31, 2001 Page 2 The Transpo Group vehicle trips do not impact the external roadway network, thus are deducted from the total trip generation to characterize net new trip generation. A rate of 25% was used to account for the internally capture trips and is a typical value reported in Trip Generation for the PM peak hour for large multi -use sites. We have recently completed traffic studies for both the Northgate Mall and Alderwood Mall Redevelopments where the 25% internal capture rate was used and accepted by the local jurisdictions. Trip generation was also calculated for the existing Southcenter Theater that would be removed with the development of the proposed restaurant. Since the theater would be removed, credit would be taken for the removal of the associated trip generation. The rate for a Movie Theater use was also found in ITE's Trip Generation and has a PM peak hour rate of 3.80 trips per 1000 gsf. The same internal capture rate used for the restaurant use was also used for the Southcenter Theater use. The trip generation estimate for the proposed restaurant is shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the trip generation for the Southcenter Theater that would be removed with the development of the proposed restaurant. Total net new trip generation is shown in Table 3 and represents the difference in trip generation between the existing and the proposed site. Table 1. PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for the Proposed Southcenter Mall Restaurant Size ITE PM Peak Hour Trips Proposed Land Use Gsfl Trip Rate2 In Out Total High- Turnover Sit Down Restaurant 9,500 10.86 62 41 103 Less Internal Capture 25% -16 -10 -26 Total New Restaurant Trips3 46 31 77 1. gsf = gross square feet. 2. Rate represents the weekday PM peak hour rate found in ITE Trip Generation. 3. Net increase represents the addition in traffic that would be generated on the adjacent roadways. Table 2. PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for the Southcenter Theater Size ITE PM Peak Hour Trips Existing Land Use Gsfl Trip Rate2 In Out Total Movie Theater 26,877 3.80 54 48 102 Less Internal Capture for Theater 25% -14 -12 -26 Total New Movie Theater Trips3 40 36 76 1. gsf= gross square feet. 2. Rate represents the weekday PM peak hour rate found in ITE Trip Generation. 3. Net increase represents the addition in traffic that would be generated on the adjacent roadways. Jill Mosqueda Brian Shelton May 31, 2001 Page 3 • Table 3. Net New PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Summary Land Use .. Size (gsf) Total PM Peak Hour Trips Proposed Restaurant 9,500 77 Less Existing Movie Theater - 26.877 -76 Total Net New 3 - 17,377 1 1. gsf = gross square feet. 2. Rate represents the weekday PM peak hour rate found in ITE Trip Generation. 3. Net increase represents the addition in traffic that would be generated on the adjacent roadways. The Transpo Group As shown in Table 3, the net new PM peak hour trip generation is estimated to be 1 new trip during the PM peak hour. This accounts for taking credit for the trips generated by the existing Southcenter Theater that would be removed with the development of this project. As a conservative analysis, no pass -by reductions were accounted for. Trip generation for the proposed restaurant would be even lower if pass -by adjustments were used. The pro.osed restaurant would venerate virtual] the same amount of traffic that is generated by the Southcenter Theater. Therefore, replacing the Southcenter Theater with a High- Turnover Sit Down Restaurant would result in no new impacts to traffic. Safety Analysis As requested in our conference call, accident data was analyzed to determine if any safety problems are evident on Southcenter Parkway around the proposed site. The latest three years of data between 1/01/98 - 12/31/00 was analyzed and is summarized in Table 4. Jill Mosqueda Brian Shelton May 31, 2001 Page 4 Table 4. Accident Data Summary The Transpo Group Location on Southcenter Parkway Head Rear On End Type of Collision Side- Right Approach swipe Angle turn Other Total Annual Accidents Average Signalized Intersections on Southcenter Klickitat Drive 1 -5 NB Off Ramp/ Mall Entrance 615t Avenue S Unsignalized Driveways on West Driveway adjacent to Theater. North Driveway adjacent to Theater Parkway 1 13 8 3 5 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 17 9 5 2 3 Southcenter Parkway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 32 4 36 10.7 1.3 12.0 0 0.0 1 0.3 As seen in Table 4, most of the accidents occurred at the signalized intersections of Klickitat Drive /Southcenter Parkway and 61St Avenue S /Southcenter Parkway /Tukwila Parkway. These intersections are the gateway to I -5, I -405 and SR-518 and have high volumes of traffic. These intersections averaged between 10 -12 accidents per year. The majority of these accidents were rear end type of collisions. The accident data doesn't reveal any specific safety problem at the intersection that would contribute to these accidents. An average of ten accidents per year is typically considered a high accident location (HAL). However, accidents per million entering vehicles (MEV) is a better guide for HAL determination but no data was available. Only one accident was recorded at the two unsignalized driveways closest to the proposed project site. There were also no fatality accidents recorded in the study area within the last three years. It should be noted that the proposed development would not have a net new increase in traffic that would have an impact on these locations. Conclusion The proposed project would generate virtually the same amount of traffic during the PM peak hour and therefore would not cause any new impacts to levels of service, operations, or traffic safety. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Thank you. 1' lbebrit4t nwm WewrlevJ a pm h 7741.5 31. 19 16 16117 17117 17117 23 21 20 0 20 20 -3c 20 4 C30 4 30 yJ 30 29 • 29 I/27 Y 27 RECEIVING AREA v 17 17 (vy 17 Y/ 16 21 21 22 22 22 22 22 21 LQWER UEVEL PARKING 26 U • 26 V % Y - L BON2MARCHE PARCEL rii 26 A 14.624 ACRES 1438 CARS v3 93 IMP �g 259) 4 .4 � 24 24 0 23 24 23 • 23 21 Y 21 875 • 19 SIG2eD rNERsE • COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE cry op TuKwll,,ta JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefore; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Exclusions from Coverage (appearing herein) and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of 'the Company. In Witness Whereof, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed as of the date of policy shown in Schedule A, the policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized signatory. Issued by: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 628 - 5666' CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: President By: "..--1--A4P)Akt1.44/ atlYvt Secretary _, w ■ • • e , 'Y� y 'X• 'Y, ^Y ".:Y•. W: K X:: ,y 1. :�.e t • GO TITLE INSURANCE • ANY 101 FIFTH AVENUE, #1800, SEATTLE, WA 98104 A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Title Unit: U -06 Phone: (206)628 -5610 Fax: (206)628 -9717 Officer: SAVIDIS/WAGNER/TERRIERE /CAMPBELL Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL Commitment Effective Date: JUNE 15, 2000 at 8:00 A.M. 1 . Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy 1992 STANDARD COMMERCIAL SHORT TERM /PRIOR POLICY, RATE Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount: $ 0.0 0 Premium: Tax: Amount: $0 . 0 0 Premium: Tax: Amount: $ 0.0 0 ALTA Loan Policy Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: 2 . The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Commitment is:. SEE ATTACHED ESTATE OR INTEREST EXHIBIT 3 . Title to the estate or interest in the land is at the effective date hereof vested in: JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4 . The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT WLTACOMA /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL ESTATE OR INTEREST EXHIBIT (Paragraph 2 of Schedule A continuation) FIRST ESTATE: ESTATE OR INTEREST CREATED BY THOSE CERTAIN DEEDS WHICH CONVEYED THE IMPROVEMENTS, BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURES'LOCATED UPON, AFFIXED TO, AND PART OF THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN AS PARCELS 1 AND 4 WHICH DEEDS WERE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8512171136 AND 19990701001219; SECOND ESTATE: A LEASEHOLD ESTATE CREATED BY THAT CERTAIN LEASE OF SAID LAND EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES NAMED HEREIN, FOR THE TERM AND UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN PROVIDED: DATED: LESSOR: LESSEE: RECORDING NUMBERS: AFFECTING: MARCH 31, 1966 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 6008264 AND AMENDED BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 6082289, 6114995, 6175803, 6185486, 6232795, 6273995, 6287041, 6331424, 6453604, 6543233, 7408090449, 7609290489, 8512171133, 8712211261, 9206121648 AND 19990701001223 PARCELS 1 AND 4, EXCEPT ALL IMPROVEMENTS, BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURES LOCATED UPON OR AFFIXED .TO SAID PARCELS 1 AND 4 COVERED BY THE FIRST ESTATE HEREIN THE LESSEE'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD OF RECORD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO ASSIGNMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281583, 8512171131 AND 19990701001217. THIRD ESTATE: A SUBLEASEHOLD ESTATE CREATED BY THAT CERTAIN SUBLEASE EXECUTED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES NAMED HEREIN, FOR THE TERM AND UPON THE TERMS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN PROVIDED, BEING A SUBLEASE UNDER THAT CERTAIN MASTER LEASE WHICH IS SET FORTH AS AN EXCEPTION IN SCHEDULE B HEREOF. DATED: SUBLESSOR: MARCH 31, 1966 THE BON, INC., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO ALLIED STORES WLTACMA4 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL ESTATE OR INTEREST EXHIBIT (Paragraph 2 of Schedule A continuation) CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION SUBLESSEE: SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION RECORDING NUMBERS: 6009574, AND AMENDED BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281581 AND 8712211265 AFFECTING: PARCELS 2 AND 3 THE LESSEE'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD OF RECORD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO ASSIGNMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281584, 8512171135, 8512310822, AND 19990701001218. FOURTH ESTATE: LEASEHOLD ESTATES AS CREATED BY THAT CERTAIN LEASE AS NOTED IN THE SECOND ESTATE HEREINABOVE AND BY THAT CERTAIN SUBLEASE AS NOTED IN THE THIRD ESTATE HEREINABOVE AS TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS, BENEFITS AND PRIVILEGES COVERED BY PARCEL 5. WLTACMA4 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26, AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, AND OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE W.H. GILLIAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 40, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26; THENCE NORTH 00 °12'09" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY PRODUCTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 406.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °47'51" WEST-30 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF ANDOVER PARK WEST AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87°25'13" WEST 526.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 30.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °25'13" WEST 253.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 366.84 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 40.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 179.20 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST FROM A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE. OF SAID SECTION 23, WHICH IS 341.40 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 14.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 10.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 36.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 7.90 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 42.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 72.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 96.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 226.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 138.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 79.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °1,9'36" EAST 10.83 FEET TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST ALONG SAID EXTENSION 10.50 FEET; CLTACMA6 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 40.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 151.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 790.45 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY VACATED BY ORDINANCE NO. 555, CITY OF TUKWILA, AND AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6516239, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SAID NORTHEAST CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON A 565.79 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, THROUGH WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 04 °34'32" EAST; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, 282.00 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT OF A 339.07 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 37.76 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY POINT OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6516243, IN KING COUNTY WASHINGTON; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN 312.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °39'00" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY MARGIN 17.04 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY (FORMERLY 57TH AVENUE SOUTH) AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5735981; THENCE SOUTH 00 °21'00" EAST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN 438.12 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE SOUTH 00 °23'45" EAST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN 633.44 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 89 °52'42" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 5.31 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 00 °07'18" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 134.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 43 °25'05" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE 6.74 FEET TO THE AFORESAID EAST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE SOUTH 00 °23'45" EAST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN 471.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF A 50 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE 77.70 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY ON THE NORTH LINE OF STRANDER BLVD. (FORMERLY SOUTH 164TH STREET), AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM SOUTHCENTER CORPORATION ON FEBRUARY 14, 1963; THENCE SOUTH 89 °26'22" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 588.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °30'56" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1,255.52 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF A 50 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE 79.14 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF ANDOVER PARK WEST, AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM SOUTHCENTER CORPORATION ON NOVEMBER 01,- 1962; THENCE NORTH 00 °12'09" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 1,652.93 FEET TO TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTACMA6 /RDA /0949 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, AND OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE W.H. GILLIAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 40, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF 217.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT•OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 151.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 182.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 406.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 182.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 179.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 366.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °25'13 EAST 253.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 208.77 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF A 45 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE 45.96 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF A 122.35 FOOT RADIUS 63.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA PARKWAY AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5735981, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 88 °40'00" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 76.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF A 1,472.39 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 423.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74 °51'30" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 407.05 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT OF 552.62 FOOT RADIUS; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SOUTHERLY MARGIN 185.63 FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 788.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 110.00 FEET OF THE WEST 151.60 FEET THEREOF; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8603140908, 8603140909 AND 8603140910. CLTACMA6 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) PARCEL 3: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, AND OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 55, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE(S) 47, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND OF THE W.H. GILLIAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 40, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 341.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 107.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 114.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°40'24" WEST 406.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 114.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 90.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 27.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 226.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 27.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 90.40 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 4: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER 65.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 °19'36" EAST 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °40'24" WEST 151.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'36" WEST 110.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °40'24" EAST 151.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 5: CLTACMA6 /RDA /0999 1 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT (Paragraph 4 of Schedule A continuation) ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS, BENEFITS, AND PRIVILEGES, TO THE EXTENT THEY CONSTITUTE REAL PROPERTY, INCLUDING ALL EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS, PARKING, ROADWAY, WALKWAYS, MALLS, COMMON AREAS, FACILITIES, BUILDINGS, UTILITIES, AND MAINTENANCE OF UTILITIES IN FAVOR OF AND FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3, AND 4, ALL AS SET FORTH AND DEFINED IN THOSE CERTAIN ACCESS, EASEMENT AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1963 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5544945; MARCH 31, 1966 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6008265 AND AS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281582 AND 8712211264; AND NOVEMBER 8, 1968 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6431696, AND AS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8712211263. CLTACMA6 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS A. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. B. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters whichwould be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. C. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. D. Any lien, or right to a lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. E. Taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. F. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, other utilities, or garbage collection and disposal. G. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. H. Water rights, claims, or title to water. I. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FOLLOW WLTACOMB/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 000574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES • PORTION OF PARCEL 1, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN FEBRUARY 26, 1962 5391852 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UTILITY LINES FOR WATER AND SEWER NORTHERLY PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY PORTIONS OF PARCEL 1 AS DESCRIBED THEREIN SEPTEMBER 30, 1964 5792901 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UTILITY LINES FOR WATER, SEWER, POWER, TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH PORTION OF PARCEL 1, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN MARCH 11, 1966 5999600 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH LINES THE WEST 5 FEET OF THE EAST 45 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE CLTACMBI /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 MARCH 11, 1966 5999601 • 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: CITY OF TUKWILA NOT DISCLOSED PORTION OF PARCEL 1., AS DESCRIBED THEREIN FEBRUARY 18, 1966 5990967 • 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: s GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UTILITY RIGHT OF WAY PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS DESCRIBED THEREIN MAY 15, 1969 6511064 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY UTILITIES AND SERVICES PARCELS 2, 3 AND OTHER PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN MARCH 15, 1969 6511065 WE NOTE THAT THERE WAS NO EXHIBIT "C" RECORDED WITH SAID INSTRUMENT. ▪ 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: TOWN OF TUKWILA CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS UNDERGROUND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, ELECTRIC POWER, GAS, TELEPHONE, AND RAILROAD SPUR CROSSINGS EASTERLY PORTIONS OF PARCEL 1 JANUARY 07, 1972 7201070397 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UTILITIES PORTION OF PARCEL 1, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN JULY 12, 1974 7407120474 10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES, MANHOLES AND CONDUIT PORTION OF PARCEL 1, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN JANUARY 03, 1975 7501030287 11. RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER SR5 AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR BY DEED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 NOVEMBER 23, 1977 7711230639 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 12. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITY GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: STATE OF WASHINGTON LOOP DETECTOR PORTION OF PARCEL 1, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN NOVEMBER 23, 1977 7711230641 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND /OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN (PORTION OF PARCEL 1) JANUARY 07, 1981 8101070484 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 14. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND /OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, AS DESCRIBED THEREIN (PORTION OF PARCEL 1) APRIL 02, 1984 8404020325 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS p 15. CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR 5) AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, BY DECREE TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ENTERED AUGUST 19, 1963, IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT CAUSE NO. 6010, AND AS MODIFIED BY THAT CERTAIN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DATED JUNE 25, 1985, AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8506260537. SAID DEED CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING RECITAL: R 8 THE COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS OF SAID APPROACH SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GRANTEES, THEIR SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS. AFFECTS: PARCELS 1 AND 2 16. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CITY OF TUKWILA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS. PORTION OF PARCEL 1 MARCH 13, 1990 9003130433 s 17. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A COLORADO CORPORATION . TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES PORTION OF PARCEL 1 DECEMBER 08, 1992 9212081832 18. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: SOUTHCENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION SEATTLE -FIRST NATIONAL BANK FEBRUARY 15, 1963 5544945 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL Y SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS REGARDING: MUTUAL BENEFICIAL ACCESS AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AND OTHER PROPERTY THE INTEREST OF SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPO'ATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO ASSIGNMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281585, 8512171134 AND 19990701001220. 19. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION AND: AND CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION, BONCOM CORPORATION, AND ALLIED STORES CORPORATION, NOW KNOWN AS THE BON, INC. RECORDED: MARCH 31, 1966 RECORDING NUMBER: 6008265 REGARDING: ESTABLISHMENT OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS FOR PARKING, ACCESS AND UTILITIES AFFECTS: ALL PARCELS SAID AGREEMENT WAS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281582 AND 8712211264. AA THE INTEREST OF SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO ASSIGNMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281585, 8512171134 AND 19990701001220. AB THE INTEREST OF BONCOM CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY ALLIED STORES GENERAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8710070516. CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AC 20. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION AND: BONCOM CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, ALLIED STORES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION RECORDED: AUGUST 30, 1966 RECORDING NUMBER: 6075322 REGARDING: CONSENT TO TERMS AMENDING EXISTING LEASE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING, NUMBER 5598077. AD AFFECTS: PARCELS 1 AND 2 As 21. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION AND: BONCOM CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, ALLIED STORES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY RECORDED: NOVEMBER 08, 1968 RECORDING NUMBER: 6431696 REGARDING: ENCROACHMENTS AFFECTING PARCEL 1 AP SAID AGREEMENT WAS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8712211263. AG THE INTEREST OF SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO ASSIGNMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS NUMBERS 8506281585, 8512171134 AND 19990701001220.. As THE INTEREST OF BONCOM CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY ALLIED STORES GENERAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY, PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8710070516. 22. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: As AFFECTS: ALL PARCELS SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION BONCOM CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, ALLIED STORES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION JUNE 28, 1985 8506281578 RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF EACH OF THE PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SHOPPING CENTER AK SAID AGREEMENT WAS AMENDED BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281579, 8712211262 AND 9102190007. AL THE INTEREST OF SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CENTER CORPORATION, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, IS NOW HELD BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, PURSUANT TO INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8712211262 AND 19990701001220. AM 23. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 87 -8 -BLA AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8712291101. AN AFFECTS: PARCELS 2 AND 4 AO 24. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA RECORDED: MAY 14, 1964 RECORDING NUMBER: 5735981 AP AFFECTS: NORTHERLY PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AQ 25. THE FOLLOWING MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY PREPARED BY APEX ENGINEERING, DATED JANUARY 16, 1999, FILE NO. 26332 AS FOLLOWS: A. BUILDING (DOUBLE TREE INN) APPURTENANT TO SAID PREMISES ENCROACHES ONTO THE EASEMENT SHOWN IN PARAGRAPH 2. B. BUILDING (FIRESTONE) APPURTENANT TO SAID PREMISES ENCROACHES ONTO THE EASEMENTS DISCLOSED IN PARAGRAPHS 3, 4 AND 8. AR 26. PAYMENT OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX, IF REQUIRED. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SITUATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF TUKWILA. PRESENT RATE IS 1.78%. ANY CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE OFFICIAL WASHINGTON STATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT. THE APPLICABLE EXCISE TAX MUST BE PAID AND THE AFFIDAVIT APPROVED AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDING OF THE CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTS. AS 27. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 115720- 0290 -04 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 2,642,900.00 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 0.00 BILLED: $ 39,777.88 PAID: $ 19,888.94 UNPAID: $ 19,888.94 AT 28. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND, PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 115720- 0292 -02 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 2,527,300.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 1,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 38,053.11 PAID: $ 19,026.56 UNPAID: $ 19,026.55 AU 29. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 537920- 0241 -07 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 3,961,300.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 5,230,500.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 139,428.95 PAID: $ 69,714.48 UNPAID: $ 69,714.47 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AW 30. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 537920- 0240 -08 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 4,587,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 69,580.26 PAID: $ 34,790.13 UNPAID: $ 34,790.13 AS 31. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 537920- 0330 -09 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 1,128,600.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 4,552,700.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 86,178.91 PAID: $ 43,089.46 UNPAID: $ 43,089.45 AY 32. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 262304 - 9023 -03 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 3,310,500.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 31,229,652.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES:. AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 523,930.16 PAID: $ 261,965.08 UNPAID: $ 261,965.08 Az 33. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 359700- 0240 -03 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 4,938,800.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 3,586,585.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 128,311.22 PAID: $ 64,155.61 UNPAID: $ 64,155.61 BA 34. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 262304-9004-06 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 22,039,200.00 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 23,873,405.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 696,437.98 PAID: $ 348,218.99 UNPAID: $ 348,218.99 BB 35. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 262304 - 9084 -09 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 673,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 451,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 17,050.55 PAID: $ 8,525.28 UNPAID: .$ 8,525.27 BC 36. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 262304- 9085 -08 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 1,385,200.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 7,422,100.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 133,596.23 PAID: $ 66,798.12 UNPAID: $ 66,798..11 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BD 37. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 262304- 9090 -01 LEVY CODE: 2390 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 425,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 1,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: REMAINDER OF PARCEL 1 BILLED: $ 6,462.80 PAID: $ 3,231.40 UNPAID: $ 3,231.40 Bs 38. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 359700- 0245 -08 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 8,043,900.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL 2 BILLED: $' 121,065.76 PAID: $ 60,532.88 UNPAID: $ 60,532.88 BF 39. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 359700- 0246 -07 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 1,350,700.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 3,139,000.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 67,572.76 PAID: $ 33,786.38 UNPAID: $ 33,786.38 AFFECTS: PARCEL 3 AND OTHER PROPERTY BO 40. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2000 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 359700- 0247 -06 LEVY CODE: 2380 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 250,100.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL 4 BILLED: $ 3,764.95 PAID: $ 1,882.48 UNPAID: $ 1,882.47 Ba 41. NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF LENDER: TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION TENANT: MERVYN'S, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION LANDLORD: SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE, AN OHIO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 c • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS RECORDED: _ FEBRUARY 20, 1992 RECORDING NUMBER: 9202200177 DI SAID AGREEMENT IS A RE- RECORDING OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9202110269. as AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BK 42. NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION TENANT: SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., A NEW YORK CORPORATION LANDLORD:. SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE, AN OHIO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: MAY 07, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9305072533 BL AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 BM 43. NONDISTURBANCE, ESTOPPEL, ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT AND CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF GROUND LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: AND: RECORDED :. MILLS COGAN MEYERS SWARTLING, A WASHINGTON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS SUCCESSOR OWNER TRUSTEE FOR THE V &S TRUST SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., A NEW YORK CORPORATION SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE, AN OHIO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP MAY 07, 1993 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 • • CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL BN SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS RECORDING NUMBER: 9305072534 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL 1 Bo 44. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION TENANT: RAINFOREST CAFE, INC., - MIST, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, D /B /A RAINFOREST CAFE LANDLORD: SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE, AN OHIO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: APRIL 8, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 9904081731 0 BP 45. RIGHTS OF TENANTS, AS TENANTS ONLY, WITH NO OPTIONS TO PURCHASE OR RIGHTS OF FIRST REFUSAL, UNDER RECORDED LEASES, AS MORE PARTICULARLY IDENTIFIED BELOW: J.C.PENNEY COMPANY: ALLIED STORES CORPORATION: RAINFOREST CAFE': MEMORANDUM OF LEASE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING.NUMBER 5598077 AND MODIFIED, AMENDED OR ASSIGNED AS SET FORTH BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 6075321 AND 9803020050 LEASE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6009573 AND MODIFIED, AMENDED OR ASSIGNED AS SET FORTH BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 8506281580, 8712211266, 8801270472 AND 9202051536 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9904081730 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS BC, 46. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON SAID PROPERTY AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. MATTERS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES GIVEN AS SECURITY, FINANCING STATEMENTS AND OTHER SECURITY INTERESTS AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OF LESSEES ONLY. BR 47. AMENDMENT, RENEWAL AND RESTATEMENT OF DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING, AND THE TERMS ' AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BB GRANTOR: JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, FORMERLY TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION AMOUNT: $ 95,000,000.00 DATED: JULY 1, 1999 RECORDED: JULY 1, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 19990701001221 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. SAID INSTRUMENT AMENDS, RENEWS AND RESTATES THE TERMS OF THAT CERTAIN DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8912280042, PREVIOUSLY MODIFIED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9206121649. Br 48. AMENDED AND RESTATED ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: CLTACMB2 /RDA /0499 is Vs CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL BU ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE: DATED: RECORDED: R.ECORDING NUMBER: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION JULY 1, 1999 JULY 1, 1999 19990701001222 SAID INSTRUMENT AMENDS, RENEWS AND RESTATES THE TERMS OF THAT CERTAIN ASSIGNMENT OF LESSOR'S INTEREST IN LEASE(S) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8912280043. BV 49. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: TENANT: LANDLORD: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: CO 50. LABOR AND /OR MATERIAL LIEN: CLAIMED BY: AGAINST: IN THE AMOUNT OF: WORK COMMENCED OR MATERIAL DELIVERED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER:. Ca AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, A NEW YORK CORPORATION' JG SOUTHCENTER LTD., AN OHIO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION JULY 1, 1999 19990701001224 MEHRER DRYWALL, INC. FEDERATED CORPORATE SERVICES, INC. $ 78,699.25 MAY 1, 1999 OCTOBER 28, 1999 19991028000184 CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS cr. 51. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE DISCLOSED THEREIN: CJ LESSOR: LESSEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES Cx 52. LABOR AND /OR MATERIAL LIEN: CLAIMED BY: AGAINST: IN THE AMOUNT OF: WORK COMMENCED OR MATERIAL DELIVERED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: cz AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DECEMBER 7, 1999 19991207000571 IDEAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC CCD /GARY HAMILTON $ 11,423.92 NOVEMBER 22, 1999 FEBRUARY 29, 2000 20000229001912 aw 53. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE(S) SHOWN IN SCHEDULE A. COPIES OF ANY AMENDMENTS /MODIFICATIONS OF SAID LEASE(S) MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THIS COMPANY FOR REVIEW. ax 54. OUR COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED WITH ESTOPPEL AFFIDAVIT(S) TO VERIFY THAT THE LEASE(S) DISCLOSED IN PARAGRAPH 2 OF SCHEDULE A ARE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AND ARE NOT IN DEFAULT OF THEIR TERMS. BY THE. CONSENT OF THE LESSOR(S) TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST BE SUBMITTED IF SAID LEASE(S) CONTAIN A PROVISION REQUIRING CONSENT FOR THE TYPE OF PROPOSED TRANSACTION. ez 55. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT FOR JG CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SOUTHCENTER LTD. cA NOTE: A COPY OF THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, MUST BE SUBMITTED. ca 56. ANY CONVEYANCE OR MORTGAGE BY JG SOUTHCENTER LTD. MUST BE EXECUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT AND BY ALL THE MEMBERS, OR EVIDENCE MUST BE SUBMITTED THAT CERTAIN DESIGNATED MANAGERS /MEMBERS HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED TO ACT FOR THE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. cc 57. TITLE IS TO BE VESTED IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL BE SUBJECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. CD 58. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. CS NOTE 1: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, DOCUMENT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN IMPOSED BY WASHINGTON LAW. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE COUNTY RECORDER. FIRST PAGE OR COVER SHEET: 3" TOP MARGIN CONTAINING NOTHING EXCEPT THE RETURN ADDRESS. 1" SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. TITLE(S) OF DOCUMENTS. RECORDING NO. OF ANY ASSIGNED, RELEASED OR REFERENCED DOCUMENT(S). GRANTORS NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND). GRANTEES NAMES (AND PAGE NO. WHERE ADDITIONAL NAMES CAN BE FOUND). ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PAGE NO. FOR FULL DESCRIPTION). ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S). RETURN ADDRESS (IN TOP 3" MARGIN). * *A COVER SHEET CAN BE ATTACHED CONTAINING THE ABOVE FORMAT AND DATA IF THE FIRST PAGE DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL REQUIRED DATA. ADDITIONAL PAGES: 1" TOP, SIDE AND BOTTOM MARGINS CONTAINING NO MARKINGS OR SEALS. CLTACMB2 /RDA /0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A.L.TA. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 574708 Your No.: SOUTHCENTER MALL SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS ALL PAGES: NO STAPLED OR TAPED ATTACHMENTS. EACH ATTACHMENT MUST BE A SEPARATE PAGE. ALL NOTARY AND OTHER PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED FOR VISIBILITY. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER. THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTIONS OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER IN SECTION 26- 23 -4; PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER SECTION 23 -23 -4; PORTIONS OF THE W.H. GILLIAM DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 40; AND PORTIONS OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55 AND BROOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 47. END OF SCHEDULE B CLTACMB2/RDA/0999 4 r �. ♦� . EXCLUSIONS (Cont'd.) 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. ALTA LOAN POLICY FORM (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay Toss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separa- tion in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encum- brance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no Toss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in Toss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim or priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is con- tracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. • • PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS: Public Information Signs are intended to make the public aware of land use and development actions which are being considered by the City, to facilitate timely and effective public participation in the review process. SIGN INSTALLATION AND SPECIFICATIONS Sign Size and Placement The sign(s) shall be 4'x4' in size, placed no closer than five (5) feet from the right -of- way at the mid -point of the more heavily traveled public street fronting the property (see Figure 1). A minimum of one sign is required on each project site. Additional signs may be required for larger sites or for properties with several street frontages. The sign(s) cannot be located within the required clear vision area depicted in Figure 2. The sign shall be prepared using the official templates provided in this packet or attachable letters. Hand lettered signs are not acceptable. Signs meeting the established criteria may be obtained from any professional sign company. Signs Now in Tukwila (206) 271 -5465 and Fast Signs in Seattle (206) 368 -7331 are two sign companies providing this service. You may consult the yellow pages to obtain quotes from other sign companies. Sign Content • The title "Notice of Land Use Action." • Type of land use or development action which is proposed. • Name of the proposed project. • Address of project site. • Name of the Applicant. • City of Tukwila logo (copy attached). • A graphic or written description of the site boundaries, and space for the Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing. • Additional information as the Director of Community Development may determine to be necessary to adequately notify the public of the pending land use application. G:APPHAN \LANDUSE .APP \SUBPR95.DOC, 06/26/00 NOTICE OF LAND USE ACTION Type of Action: Project Name: Site Address: Applicant: Site Map 14 "x21" Laminated Notice of Application 8.5 "x14" Laminated Public Notice 8.5 "x14" 7 to 9 feet Top of Notice Sign shall be 7 to 9' above grade Sign Materials Use 4'x4'x12' Post Use 4'x4' Plywood Use 1/2 "x 3 "Gals. Lag Bolts w/washers Sign Lettering Use Helvetica Lettering Black Lettering on White Background for all but the BoardTiitle Red Lettering on WhitE Background for the Board Title "Notice of Land Use Action" Logo 8 inch diameter See Figure 3 for lettering sizes and placement Laminated To Submit comments or obtain additional information Please contact the Department of Community Development at (206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 To See Figure 4 for a copy of the City Seal Andover Park West Project Site Nonce Sign placed 5 teet Inside the property line 1111 IIII 1111 IIII 1 1 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 '_IIII ° -- 1111 = 101 -1111 -111 i_1111 1111 101 1111 IIII 1111 1111 IIII = IIII= IIII = IIII =1 ; =1111= IIII= IIII= IIII= IIII= IIII =1111= 1111 =1111- 1111 = 1111 =111 1, 1111= 1111 °1111=1111 = 1111=1111 =1111= 1111 =1111= IIII= IIII =1 ; =1111= 1111 =1111 =1111 =1111 =1111 =1111= 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = ❑I L - --� . ■111 = 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = 1111 = t - -- G :APPHAMLANDUSE.APPISUBPR95.DOC, 06/26/00 Notice Sign shall be located at the grander Bvd midpoint of the site street fronlage Posts should be placed no Tess than 2' -6" below grade Public Notice Board Sign Location Example Andover Park East FIGURE 2 • • 4' 8" Dia 2.75" (Lettering, Red) NOTICE OF LAND USE ACTION 1.5" (Lettering) TYPE OF ACTION: PROJECT NAME: SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: 1.5" (Lettering) TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT PLANNER AT (206) 431 -3670 Tukwila Planning Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 1.O "(LETTERING) FIGURE 4 G:APPHANU_ANDUSE.APP\SU6PR95. DOC. 06/26/00 • • FIGURE 5 G: APPHAN \LANDUSE.APP \SUBPR95.D0C, 06/26/00 • • RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT The applicant shall be solely responsible for the construction, installation, maintenance and removal of the notification sign(s) and the associated cost. The sign(s) shall be erected no later than fourteen (14) days after the Department of Community Development issues the Notice of Complete Application and will remain erected until the date specified by the Department. The applicant shall sign an affidavit, stating that the sign(s) were installed and posted in accordance with all City codes and ordinances. The affidavit of posting shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development by the applicant within fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. If the sign is made illegible, removed or otherwise destroyed prior to the date of the final Public Hearing or final action by the City of Tukwila, the applicant is responsible for the immediate replacement of the sign. Failure to maintain the Notice Board in good condition is cause for the discontinuance of the review of the application until the Notice Board is replaced and remains in place for a specified time period. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Department shall provide the applicant with all information necessary for the installation of the Public Notification Board. These materials include a copy of the City logo, size and materials requirements, and illustrated examples of a Posting Board. The Department will also determine the type of decision being rendered for this application and specify to the applicant the duration of the posting period. The Department shall post the Notice of Hearing on any posted Notice Board(s) erected pursuant to TMC 18.104.110 at least 14 days prior to any Public Hearings on Type 3, 4 and 5 decisions, Open Record Appeal Hearings on Type 2 decisions and Closed Appeal Hearings on Type 4 decisions. REQUIRED CLEAR VISION AREA NO SIGNAGE ALLOWED FIGURE 3 G:APPHAN\LANDUSE .APP \SUBPR95. DOC. 06/26/00 Decision Type Type 1 decision Type 2 decision On-Site Posting Periods Duration of Posting Period Type 3, 4, or 5 decision For any project requiring a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit For projects triggering SEPA review, posting shall take place within 14 days after notice of the public comment period. Single Family dwellings are exempted. For projects triggering SEPA review, posting shall take place within 4 days after notice of completeness until the later of (1) 14 days after the issuance of a decision or (2) the date of any administrative appeal hearing. For all type 3, 4, and 5 decisions, posting shall take place within 14 days after notice of completeness until the date of the public hearing 46. The Public Notice Board shall be 440 posted for a minimum of 30 days G:APPHAN \LANDUSE .APP \SUBPR95.DOC, 06 /26/00 Notice of Hearing At least 14 days prior to any public hearing on Type 3, 4, and 5 decisions open record appeal hearings on Type 2 decisions and closed record appeal hearings on type 4 decisions the Project Planner shall post the Notice of Hearing on any posted notice board(s) erected Removal of Posting Board Applicant is responsible for removing the posting board in a timely manner in accordance with the time limit described in the "Duration of Posting Period" section. FIGURE 1 6,99 • To: Brian Shelton, Jill Mosqueda From: Cyndy Knigh Date: June 7, 2001 Re: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Southcenter Mall Restaurant City of Tukwila The traffic analysisprepared by The Transpo Group for the proposed Southcenter Mall Restaurant replacing the existing theatre:isadequate.,.There are no new significant traffic impacts needing mitigation from this proposal. 1d31N3O 1IWd3d 1 SCI ot)t ) do $. 4444 AAAA 6 O! 64 Q 1 731 Pldtmel 61mo5oCm? �e�sr O...ar •0124:110 PROPOSED BAHAMA BREEZE SOUTHCENTER normw 1.00031191 1111107 D=tae,c1e3. mo6 0••11.1. MID 4111212.0 0 SEAlTLE r.,•Ile Fit 4 i'r Ilm,e•-,,: f inks____J=d_ SEATTLE y )t 71•'"q ate io O.., J 711 COUN ina4 (4, ••:/.34..#M pwreIrm ',a, be n,,,n41,1e .411. moot. 2, -.-iptire 18-9 Zoning Designations LDR-Low Density Rdentfal MOR-Medum Density Residential MDR-High Density Residential 0-Office MUG-kited Use Office RCC-Residenhal Comment! Center NCC-iteOliood Commercial Cutter RC-Regional Commercial RCM-Regional Commercial Mixed Use TUC-Tukwila Urban Center I-Commerrial 1.10111 Industrial ll http://www.ci tukwi I a. wa.us/dc d/zonemap 1 jpg G •/ RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER 06/ I 4/200 1 NORDSTROM DEPT. STORE 1711tH it OCAS L.] KC/M.5 MALL iTORES ARCA 2U 21 21 G"-2117\12 6 20 20 Q 20 v HE BON MARCHE DEPT. STORE FOUR 2lOcHS J l06 7 1 17 `U 16 u u 22 Yi 22 22 } n J 22 I p 29 �) \ _9 21 19 2` 27 27 \\ 20 U 29BON t4ARCHE PARCEL 4: iIl 7 \1 I9 a4 ACRES ,9R, CARS 1; \>, `, 0 21 4 22 .1 11 1/ 21 C wl: SITE LOCATOR FAAP FRONT ELEVATION 1/4' LEFT SIDE ELEVATION L.A.' • I.-0. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 8 2001 PERMIT CENTER it- 0 TUKWILLA, WASHINGTON cip.1 ri ARC,. II • , • ,;.,, RIGHT 511-)E ELEVATION V4* ,REAR ELEVATION SCALE■ RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 8 2081 PERMIT CENTER ACC r1CrS •••• •••• •••■•-• .■••••• • • 0 z B -136 H -13 Existing J.C.Penney • H -14 2 Existing Glass Wall Existing Parking 24 Existing Glass Wall H -7 27. B -137 0 Existing Parking C -1 26 C -4 B' A' 26 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS 0 60 120 I----I I-1 I-1 I Scale in Feet NOTE Base map provided by Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. c-1 B -137 Q H -7 • A LEGEND Boring Designation and Completed by Shannon Boring Designation and Completed by Shannon Boring Designation and Completed by Shannon 25 Proposed Department Store #5 Approximate Location & Wilson July 1988 Approximate Location & Wilson July 1966 Approximate Location & Wilson November 1961 Generalized Subsurface Profile C -3 C -2 [C\ Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center BORING LOCATION PLAN November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 2 A West 40 • 20 o • , a�• . w 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 B -137 (Proj. 86' S.) 22 ■ 30 ■ 22 ■ 12■ 5■ 5■ 3■ 3■ 2■ 2■ 1■ ? 21W 25 ■ 30 ■ 42 ■ to co c0 Existing Ground Surface 9 Layered, very soft to medium stiff, organic, clayey SILT and silty PEAT Medium to dense, silty, sandy GRAVEL >100 — 9 16 8■ P P■ P■ P■ P1 431 40 ■ 37 ■ 75 ■ 88 ■ 78 ■ 92 L c(o N PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS Layered, medium dense, silty, fine SAND and stiff to very stiff, clayey SILT with gravel and organics (FILL) 26 ■ H -8 (Proj. 22' N.) 16■ 18 PI P1 Medium dense, P ■ fine to coarse SAND and.. fine GRAVEL with silt, shells P1 and a trace of organics 13 9� 43■ Dense to very dense, fine to coarse SAND and fine GRAVEL with silt, shells and a trace of organics (some cobbles and boulders) 47 ■ 67 ■ 45 ■ 49 ■ 67 ■ 76 ■ 97 ■ 70 ■ >100 - 9 A' East 0 40 80 0 10 20 f—I Horizontal Scale in Feet 40 Vertical Scale in Feet 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 80 Elevation in Feet (M.S.L.) LEGEND C -1 • Boring Designation and Location 15 50/3' P Standard Penetration Test, Blows/Foot Standard Penetration Test, Blows/Inches Driven Pushed Sample • Water Level Observed During Drilling Water Level and Date Observed Bottom of Boring NOTES 1. Elevation data obtained from topographic map provided by Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. 2. The soil conditions shown are generalized from the boring data. Variations between the profile and actual conditions may exist. 3. Boring B -137 was completed July 6, 1966 by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 4. Borings H -7 and H -8 were completed 10 -9 -61 and 11 -15 -61 respectively, by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE A -A' November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 3 Elevation in Feet (M.S. B South 40 — 20 -20 -40 -60 -80 H -8 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS Existing Ground Surface C -4 (Proj. 30' E.) B' North — 40 16• 261 9 PI Layered, soft to medium stiff, clayey P, SILT and silty PEAT with some shells -16■ N' Layered, medium dense, silty, fine 22i� SAND and stiff to very stiff, clayey 27. co SILT with gravel and organics (FILL) tn 12. 5►=- p ■ Very soft, clayey 5 SILT with shells -- 0 IN P• P1 3a 43■ 47 ■ 67 ■ 45 ■ 49 ■ 67 ■ 76 ■ 97 ■ ? - ?_ Medium dense, fine to coarse SAND and fine GRAVEL with silt, shells and a trace of organics 70r. >100 EL- Dense to very dense, fine to coarse SAND and fine GRAVEL with silt, shells, and a trace of organics (some cobbles and boulders) Distorted layers of hard, fine sandy SILT, very dense, fine to coarse SAND and fine GRAVEL, with a trace of organics — 20 5. 11!� 19■ 9 — 24' 34m 36 ■ 36 ■ 50/4" • '50/2" • 50/2" is 100/4 "a 100/1"m 100/1 "■ 100/1" mk- and organics 1 — -20 — -40 7 — -60 0 40 80 0 10 20 40 Horizontal Scale in Feet Vertical Scale in Feet 80 Elevation in Feet (M.S.L.) LEGEND C -1 • - Boring Designation and Location 15 50/3" P Standard Penetration Test, Biows/Foot Standard Penetration Test, Blows /Inches Driven Pushed Sample - Water Level Observed During Drilling — Water Level and Date Observed Bottom of Boring NOTES 1. Elevation data obtained from topographic map provided by Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. 2. The soil conditions shown are generalized from the boring data. Variations between the profile and actual conditions may exist. 3. Boring H -8 was completed 11 -15 -61 by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 4. Boring C -4 was completed. 6 -29 -88 by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE B -B' November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 4 Elevation in Feet (M.S.L.) C South 40 — 20 -20 -40 -60 -80 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL MALL SHOPS H -7 9 Existing Ground. Surface C -1 (Proj. 15' E.) C' North Layered, medium dense to dense, silty, fine SAND and very 16 ■ N stiff to stiff, clayey SILT with gravel and organics (FILL) _ 81 9 ? ? P■ P Layered, very soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT and silty PEAT with P1 some gravel, shells and organics P1 P1 9 43■ 40 ■ 37 ■ 755 88 ■ 78 ■ 92 III . 9 Very loose to medium dense, fine to coarse sandy, fine GRAVEL with silt and shells Dense to very dense, fine to medium SAND and fine GRAVEL with silt, shells and a trace of organics 9 38 ■ 29 ■ -14■ 131 5■ P■ 4 2 36 28 38 81 ? 31 50/5" 50/2" Distorted layers of hard, fine sandy SILT, very dense, fine to coarse SAND and fine GRAVEL, with a trace of organics 50/3" 100/4" 50/6" 125/6" 55/6" 95/6" 0 40 80 0 10 20 40 H Horizontal Scale in Feet Vertical Scale in Feet 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 80 Elevation in Feet (M.S.L.) LEGEND C -1 Boring Designation and Location 15 50/3" P Standard Penetration Test, Blows /Foot Standard Penetration Test, Blows/Inches Driven Pushed Sample Water Level Observed During Drilling Qom- Water Level and Date Observed co co rn Bottom of Boring NOTES 1. Elevation data obtained from topographic map provided by Center Ridge Design Services, Inc. 2. The soil conditions shown are generalized from the boring data. Variations between the profile and actual conditions may exist. 3. Boring H -7 was completed 10 -9 -61 by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 4. Boring C -1 was completed 6 -27 -88 by Shannon &' Wilson, .Inc. Proposed Additional Mall Shops Southcenter Shopping Center GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE C -C' November 1988 W- 4978 -01 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical Consultants FIG. 5