Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E01-017 - LANG JOHN - SABEY ITCE PARKING LOT REPAVEMENTE01 -017 INTERGATE EAST BLDG 3333 S 120TH PL TO: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION DATED July 17, 2001 John Lang, Sabey Corporation King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter serves as a notice of decision that the application for planned action regarding the repaving of an existing 44 -space parking lot is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND PROJECT FILE NUMBER: E01 -017 APPLICANT: John Lang, Sabey Corporation REQUEST: Determine that the proposed improvements fall under the Manufacturing /Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC /H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. LOCATION: 3333 South 120th Place PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the repair and repaving of an existing 44 -space parking lot located between Buildings 2 and 3 in the Intergate East complex. It will require the export of approximately 800 tons of asphalt and the import of approximately 842 tons of asphalt and 916 tons of crushed rock. DETERMINATION: The project falls under the planned action guidelines. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIION: MIC /H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Deborah Ritter, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3663 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development Date City of Tukwila ‘ 11 ) 2c: j 0300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3070 • Fax: 200 -431 -3065 \ VICINITY PLAN .1111-1-1-71-1. AREA MAP PROJECT SITE DATA - .4. red. most am.. . a. 41,C... .... PAVING RETROFIT - .,....".,....••,.... :7-ngl."..1-"•":""":""' A LIR. C2111lik AN PA* 1.11.:nr firs= RANT MS. a/ 20/0 ." ..7.; .10471ATE EAST IAC MAT DA. 7 I PAE.1.4 •t. MOST/ soo. P • AFC 4(117091 nx,1013 a.,1,0 ME • C.01.-4%,/./no.aal. onde■ MAMA 01,0 P.1 0•011.0 14/ .1.0 ELAM. Al A1.0 MIN 22 2001 PERMIT CENTER Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , s-c-/.. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing v Project Number: )-5D / -0/ 1 Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: Ab Notice of Public Meeting. . Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other )/0%/( -E b)=7" bGCAJ'rpN) Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 11 day of in the year 20001 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: Seq*1;), /TGE S$ fa41 ,4 ho - v Project Number: )-5D / -0/ 1 Mailer's Signature: Nkijaki .4,41,22-1„___ , . Person requesting mailing: Ab P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHIOIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE Pl. MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE `ice SPA ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY -A /� ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ()TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* () FFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ) C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ()MAYOR C0( -0('7 ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: \ADMINISTRATIV EFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW PUBLNOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERIPS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days .of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\A D M IN I STRATI V E FORM S \FORMS \C HK L I ST. DOC • • Mr. John Lang, AIA Vice President, Architecture Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International Blvd., 4th Floor Seattle, Washington 98168 -5121 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Deborah Ritter -Da Date: July 17, 2001 Re: MEMORANDUM E01 -017 (SEPA Planned Action) Sabey Intergate East, Building 3 3333 South 120th Place Project Description: The project involves the repair and repaving of an existing 44 -space parking lot located between Buildings 2 and 3 in the Intergate East complex. It will require export of approximately 800 tons of asphalt and import of approximately 842 tons of asphalt and 916 tons of crushed rock. Site lighting, landscaping and irrigation will be replaced. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None. Recommendation: Determination that the proposed improvements fall under the Manufacturing /Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC /H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 o Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 TO: • City of lTIIIIIII„t • Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION DATED July 17, 2001 John Lang, Sabey Corporation King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a notice of decision that the application for planned action regarding the repaving of an existing 44 -space parking lot is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND PROJECT FILE NUMBER: E01 -017 APPLICANT: John Lang, Sabey Corporation REQUEST: Determine that the proposed improvements fall under the Manufacturing /Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC /H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. LOCATION: 3333 South 120th Place PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the repair and repaving of an existing 44 -space parking lot located between Buildings 2 and 3 in the Intergate East complex. It will require the export of approximately 800 tons of asphalt and the import of approximately 842 tons of asphalt and 916 tons of crushed rock. DETERMINATION: The project falls under the planned action guidelines. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIION: MIC /H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Deborah Ritter, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3663 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development City of Tukwila 11) 20 Date 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 /\ VICINITY PLAN db -0•, AREA MAP PROJECT SITE DATA wium. i_, m K.,,,.,,. J '= PAVING RETROFIT ss= OM APCFIIT i.�'1 U XE. ANS Oaf wANT431*041001 MTERGATE FAST ors 0410 PANIC Ft/ MOOT mown Mt e M w s 477N437+.M.•■■uu rem urea 01 -}0 -04 ®w 21.11M.!1111111•10e .11111.11.111 A1.0 JUN 2 2 2001 PERMIT CENTER • Ciy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James E Morrow, P.E., Director MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 2001 TO: Deb Ritter A� FROM: Mike Cusick SUBJECT: E01 -017 - SEPA Planned Action for Intergate East Building 3 Repaving At this time, Public Works has no comments to the SEPA Planned Action for the repaving of the parking area. Public Works will address engineering and code issues at plan submittal. MC:lw (P:laurie /mike /memo E01 -017) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 w 1 ire 1.0 'VICINITY PLAN AREA MAP PROJECT SITE DATA Oa Ry' 33.3 ••3333•0 03131331/33333 V SABEY ARCHITECTURE Mae 3r03311 PEWIT aza 04/30/01 -me FAwm acmmr moss eft aVatfr u- 1111,. Ptein mom arm a1 -70-01 3301 130333 IT A1.0 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 2 2001 PERMIT CENTER N31N301IV 3d PAVING PLAN BUILDING 2 PARKING AREA INTERGATE EAST TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS SASEY CORPORTMON TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS (TMC 21.04.152) Please complete the following checklist to demonstrate that all significant adverse environmental impacts have been clearly avoided or mitigated. Please respond on separate sheets as needed. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Date Checklist prepared: June 22, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction Summer 2001. 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, additional site reconditioned paving under separate permit. 4. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. SEPA Planned Action Land Altering Permit. 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and altematives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Repaving of existing site for 44 surface parking spaces. Construction of site lighting, landscape and irrigation. 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3311 South 120th Place, Tukwila WA (see attached Drawing A1.0). 8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes Agency Comments: ao CTY C: TtlKVIllA JUN 2 2 2UU1 PERMIT CENTER • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one) mountainous, other rolling, hilly, steep slopes, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Combination of medium -dense sand /silt with dense silt lens approximately 40 feet down. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 58,000 s.f. for final grading AC Pavement & landscaping. Export Broken Asphalt: 800 cty, Import: 842 tons asphalt, Crushed rock: 916 tons. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion control will be utilized throughout construction process. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75 %. Existing asphalt pavement area is 58,000 s.f. Landscape (14,000 s.f.) will be installed to equal 44,000 s.f., 25% less than existing condition.. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard good practice of temporary erosion control to protect nearby stream and catch basins. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal construction noise, dust and odors. When completed, parking for 44 existing vehicles in areas of work to produce noise and emissions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water -2- • • a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Riverton Creek immediately adjacent to west. Flows into Duwamish River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Reconditioning and maintenance within 15 feet of Riverton Creek. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agriculture; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Surface water runoff from reconditioned impervious areas to be collected by catch basins routed through detention pipe and oil water separator into existing storm water system. Designed to King County Surface Water Design Manual standards. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Potential oil from vehicles onto impervious surface. -3- • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Applicant to design system that eliminates sediment from entering Riverton Creek. Existing oil water separator to clean runoff of vehicle oil. Designed to King County Surface Water Design Manual standards. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ® Deciduous Tree: Alder, Maple, Aspen, Other ® Evergreen Tree: Fir, Cedar, Pine, Other ❑ Shrubs ❑ Grass ❑ Pasture ❑ Crop Or Grain ® Wet Soil Plants: Cattail, Buttercup, Bullrush, Skunk Cabbage, Other ❑ Water Plants: Water Lily, Eelgrass, Milfoil, Other ❑ Other Types Of Vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Removal of shrubs. Topsoil vegetation to be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmon in Riverton Creek. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Raywood Ash, Vine Maple, Austrian Black Pine, Rhododendron, Laurel, Japanese Holly, and Kinnikinnik. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds. hawk heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Otter fish: bass, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmon c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. Lower Riverton Creek (below site) stocked with salmon fry. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric - Site lighting. -4- • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Standard emergency services. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction traffic (short term), Tenant traffic (long term) 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise per City of Tukwila ordinance requirements. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial, Research & Development, Storage, and Residential. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown c. Describe any structures on the site. One -story tilt -up concrete buildings (3311 and 3333 S. 120th PI) situated on either side of work area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MIC /H f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MIC /H, Processing and industrial on MIC Implementation Plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A -5- • • h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. Riverton Creek nearby. See Attachment A, Wetland and Stream Delineation Report by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC.. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 44 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10 Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? None b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Four Parking Light Standards to be installed. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Specified lights will minimize glare. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Walking trail by river 1/4 mile away. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No -6- • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Enhance creek buffer with native vegetation under separate permit. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14 Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. South 120th Street and South 124th Street main access to East Marginal Way. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. 800 feet to nearest transit stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 44 created. None eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. Number of parking stalls unchanged. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None -7- 1 • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electric: Seattle City Light; Water: Water District 125 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electric: Seattle City Light. C. Signature The above answers are t - d co t to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying o ' ecision. Signature: • its• -s - Date Submitted: k/ot/of City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Date: City of Tukwila e Endangred Species Act Screening Checklist b P Screening RF_Ce_IVFp CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 2 2001 PERMIT CENTER Applicant Name: John W Land. ATA, VP of ?r ecture Street Address: 12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor City, State, Zip: Seattle WA 98168 -5121 Telephone: 206 - 281=8700 DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 1 • City of T vila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the , • existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 0 Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 a Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 7 Part A (continued) • City of Tibia ESA Screening Chedklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. - - NO — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. - NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 Continue to Question 1-3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving., compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 Part B (continued) City of Vila ESA Screening Checklist • 1 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 0 Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 0 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. CO Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high « ater mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 4 City of Tulip ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary; high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, . construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both -banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the_project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 City ofila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or.wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 6 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development PLANNED 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431-360TY OF TUKWILA ACTION E- mail.: tukplan @ci. tkwila. wa. us. JUN 2 2 2001 • SEPA FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT Planner: b2,10 I 1 File Number: 6- 0 / -o Application Complete: (Date: yA, n ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete: (Date: n ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Intergate . East, Building l eravo & frage( LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 3333 S. 120th Place, Tukwila WA Tax_ 107304 -9069 Quarter: SW Section: 10 Township: 23N Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: John Lang, AIA, VP of Architecture Address: 12201 Tu wila International Blvd, 4th Floor, Seattle WA 98168 -5121 Phone: 206 -277 �%[ Signature: I /�(� 11 A FAX: 206-281-0920 Date: 6/22/01 G.:L -I PPHANILANDUSE.APPlsplan.doc, 06/13/00 3 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter BoulevarcL Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanRci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWII A JUN 2 2 " 2001 PERMIT CENTER STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. Weifa=aturrent owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City its em loyees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property,Iocatedat .333i S 120th Place, Tukwila WA for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application Without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non- responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ss EXECUTED at Tukwila (city), WA (state), on June 22, 2001 vi r3 A Sabey (Print Name) 12201 Tukwila Intern'l Blvd (Address) Seattle WA 98168 206 - 281 -8700 (P umber / / PIPI, ^ ,, ,,�� H gnature) On this day personally appeared before me ,^, YVG J #- V f `-1 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /94 signed the same as his, f voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. �t SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS / /DAY OF C. BRO t t NOTAR PLABIAc in a or, &he State of Washington N �` '�� residing at i u.13 n~ G:4 APPHANII .ANDUSE.APP'SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 My Commission expires on . //-5 J 05— 2 • . PLEToE;.APPLICATI • The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. There is no filing fee. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE .:Information required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of the Planning Division.. Information Waived Ping Div. Office Use Only Comments & Condition's.' .` . 1. One (1) copy of the Complete Application Checklist, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Four (4) sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action. 3. One (1) set of plans reduced to 8,5 "x11 "(High Quality Photo Reduction) 4. Four (4) copies of supporting studies. G: IAPPHANIL.ANDUSE.APPlsptan.doc, 06/13/00 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWII.A JUN 2 2 201 PERMIT CENTER 7