Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E01-026 - ARAUCTO JEFFREY - HESIER BUILDING ASSOCIATESHEISER BLDG ASSOC 11210 TIB E01 -026 Nov -21 -01 11:59A geo beiser body co 206 •2 7135 411 HEISER 7,wck 6'.44$ GEO. HEISER BODY CO. i INC. 725 SOUTH HANFORO STREET • 622 -7985 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98134 November 16, 2001 P.02 HEISER pot & Sif" The Heiser Body Co., Inc. is a manufactor of truck bodies, body repair shop and paint shop. The existing building will be the area for the manufacturing of the bodies and the body repair. Heiser is also a dealer for Supreme Truck Bodies, Waltco and Maxon Liftgates and other various truck equipment lines. Heiser's business is primarily a wholesale manufactor but with substainuat retail transactions. The new building will be a painting facility. The tenants who currently occupy the existing buildings are General Trailer and Triad Machinery. General Trailer has a large wholesale and retail truck parts department and a trailer repair facility. This is very similar to the business which Heiser will be operating. Triad Machinery also has a large retail parts department. Triad's main business is rental of large equipment and the repair of the same. Triad has sub - leased the paint facility to Norm's Truck and Equipment. This paint building will be removed when we build the new paint facility. Nov -21 -01 11:59A go heser body co 206 6 7135 11/15/01 THU 15;13 FAX 253 4 671 PATCO P.03 71002 drOPft•►sA 1pas+ • 2Di 1. !. - dii1=1 • Z09-are Womb? Soft1ll*4 tint. tha andaralgoadi She Orateorr. doe* h!Sbor • heel to resales that earlata inseams dated Mos rt. 190 sna • !!La of motet* with the 6 Camay y lsai tas, • ropy of Mhta11.1* hohOto attaehaf• to accordance with the earns of sold Rosemont the eeme shall he cull and rcid at the and of sixty diva Rios after 7sur reams* this scoot. • Item seen. r led 4•*.s..4: •ett. + .... • . ... . w•r »rMM— Vasa. seta strut +ymp.d*. sib. raRgt��.. - _ WM% oor - ..rely •.drip t ems+IM rsiewm rt • • •t: Nov -21 -01 12:00P goo heser body co 11/15/01 TRU 15:16 FAX 2S3 4'5521 FATCO 206 60 7135 P. 04 003 40.44 - pow.;7 0.- 4 fr7Sdri MfiIMI A. Xing a is the ser of the following Sit describe& property s '9 podhipe Of the , Swage e 0 r W., Meg tor'17 or Primary Pan Werth, D 44 to tbss5lsos or f0*sniasgtco► 0°7 flo fie• s era essm�red portite •e o' 1* 1 I County tile t cense so�t�o. X557 e >A0 Of that p cost decor veent Lot 2, se► 5aottom 91 Tse.neblo 23 Moran flonge Meet N.M;# N.1 ;# described eye follows* •Seeirmlintr stiff the imeereeeties of the Santis time 1.1 a Perth 035 r «t ot Seta O verammat Lot 2 with the 1astst17 p9rinarr Sate >ti T $s. x ma san�royea to the State or Veehiagtaae br deed rewrite =air £Alter's P124 No. 3909008; theme Xorcherl .less amid Sestast"ly lives 130 !ersti theme Sees piarallel with the :larch line e! said Government Lot ZI a distenee er 110 retool thence Southerly, Paella ••.th field hl l feet to loee at tof t ��11 a in 11 line to the potase ofb iglnni0dt nerd VS1RIA1 s tg46 is pusal+as� Sent b7 *entreat the tollottihi • described gropers; 1n Zing Caunts. 1Pet All that portico* or oevsrment Lot 1, Scotian 10, :ostsship 23 - North, home 4 halt, t1.2, in ring goblet:, dshiaE won. 17 fg� North of the De em%s)' diver or berth or the •lover. menr. ate-..r line Anne the Worth beck ot Bald river and Lett of the icesee:AY lino or 'set Neiginal lure =VT thot port/en as OOOE •seed b7 Superior Corse oases Fro. 469557 tar Xin a7 � linetr possessory right male= any s but nereto thereof Zir d1s111 o tom as t1 rs.de. MAD a�cc =VT that portion eeosenetfl et _o point an a Sept lino of Mtn Government =.a I, tying seeds o °3s 40• Sees 630.33 rae2t has the Sort:tweet corner thereat sad rennkb thence South 60 51•Z0- Saet Dwr-allal x..r the Borth lino of 1014 Government Ltet 1, t0 .79 tent to the .=.:* Point of beginning; Meows Storm 49"4r'1o■ Seat 314 feet nose or lean to fate ailet irlr lino of Gobi ;tot,&.— 2.7: tat:ea 16 4' S0• Gtot eight 6ai4 itesaarii 1L.• oo tho 7 &s* 1.ah diver thence lggs�te7W �n6 the 1edisrt 21V•i to a point -1t `aurae South tl °12!49• fievt tram the tree efpain f beginning: t ea far beaming genet go Beat to the trans pointy all amisbinfj ester line*. end • fif'�tA6 P. GRATUB' 6 prspeetb7 ceders en Prises=? Salto High- mar Ho. 1 And assiMss peopsre7 borders en Gast Marginal 'l*.r. and 'V !1 5 boob parties are interested an lsenencat r ln5ress and egress to Neiman, State Sichner O. Iona feel. nos therefore SOS 112 i1: CaNnISMINMON OP WI IIOft' A2. ? grL1 cagr►i2 x. Nov -21 -01 12:OOP geo Keiser body co 11/15/01 TRU 15:14 FAX 253 47!5571 FATCO • 206 60 7135 bereiA.ead the oatea saseeents vested heraia the sortie* agree to mane to each ocher the tellsifies aameaent,,tos tesress Oad egress co she primary state 4ieh wey No. 1 earl stea,a at Nergia$1 Rey ec the t)ropeseiss Am described belay. These easements Mall be peraonal to eaeb er the Parties hereto an& Monet r with the •Load am& spy to wrote& by either Derizr by giviactQ the *they pests sisal (do) dais written habits or- rwheretisa. • A. P. 04A' 40ee webr t to t)TSYS 0sATSka the following describe& memento to roe to Des'eCIM1a1 en& moist the abems eepditiaees • VIA nowthm 1y forty {►O1 less an width of that portion of • • elemeNent Let t. is sssties 9. toenail, 23 Mirth. MS, g a east. VA.. in ffins Co linty, Vashingtos. lying eosterlY Of the east lies of state dlehmerNo. 1, gad .lame seathweseerlr of v tn. traceaisalen %ins right or was am condemns& in Ming eecntr superior Court Cogs NA. +49597 POI MD Ip Ti'0)i of the above etesaeat, 47.37! :3:.:Z3,1 awe h.rebt geese co A. 7. MATZ= tee following desorsbsd lAD4W,!, to rein %9 A. P. GRAIZIR peticfta11t and htaoer she maces ocn4ittoao: The aorthmoel7 tort (40) feat in width of that portion. or thove:taelnt Lee t. tilt eas0iee 1D, resgahlp 23 earth. _asst :. W. a.h.. in Sin& neon , ..ahin t IYir_B Westerly of :.e Meat line at Nest Way, sae lying southerly or Z.41 tsenehM1telien 3APO as eoademted in Xing county Superior Cour: Cause se. b69551. • yet VIIN15i3 mom the parki 196ereto bare uses ed this instrument tart (�der of VebrUAT7 y _ a. 9t. O ___ e_. Wan 07 4ANNINCTOti CCdt; 0? $u4G es On this day personally eppeered before me A. P. MA:Zia vd 51W2 =ATZSR, to se known se be the ledividnals described La and leo exeeuted the '&them and ?etegAinff instr mento and ,chnowle4ge4 that 7 pried the ewe as their free and •oignem y Ao t sttd dead. for the 'mom therein aentioasI. • 5t motor MY tribal end olfloial peal this _daY or 1909. Our AAA tor the Mr LO Washington. residing at SlAr 1. P.05 ��. a004 :•••■:•;. .• • • • • -. • Nomorimom. _7r•!7•1r !WIN' 0/J47 ww7fr- -'1E jcofi :D"!"-ivy7y nccvc.L..- yr, r e 00 cizol:14.10401 CZ. 0111. OreVIT • . • . '• • • . • . .• •• • .- COO eartgla 90'd SEIL 09 90Z CrAtVd ILOS CSZ XV& la:ST agi, TO/SVIT o .4poq y oa6 d00:Zi TO-TZ-A0N 20010424001824 Nov -21 -01 12:OOP geo h.er body co C -3 EXHIBIT "A" 206 610 7135 P.07 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 469557; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. I AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 230 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY LINE 230 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 435 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NOS.: FOR: AFFECTS: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JUNE 3, 1930 2609159 (VOL. 1461, P. 574) PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JANUARY 20, 1939 3028739 AND 3028740 WATER MAIN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SAID EASEMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE ITS EXACT LOCATION WITHIN SAID PREMISES TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JULY 7, 1959 5053062 WATER LINE REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION continued' Nov -21 -01 12 :01P goo h er body co cn c7 �V 206 7135 EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: JULY 9, 1962 RECORDING NO.: 5449765 FOR: UTILITIES AFFECTS: REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NOS.: FOR: AFFECTS: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR. OF: FOR: AFFECTS: TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: FEBRUARY 25, 1969 6475006 AND 7202290168 INGRESS AND EGRESS NORTHERLY 40 FEET TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: MAY 30, 1991 9/05300398 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SYSTEM 10 FOOT WIDE STRIP ALONG THE NORTHERLY PORTION TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: NOVEMBER 20, 1991 9111201395 NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES 10 FOOT WIDE PORTION, REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION UNRECORDED LEASES IN FAVOR OF: TRIAD MACHINERY GENERAL TRAILER PARTS LLC P.08 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 6, 2001 Jeffrey Araucto 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 ' Seattle WA 98122 Re: Request for additional information for Heiser Building Addition- SEPA and building permit applications. Dear Mr. Araucto: Based on review of submittal requirements for Planned Action SEPA, your application is deemed complete. At this time we have started code related review of your application and the following information is required to further process your application: A. Comments related to Planned Action SEPA 1. Based on the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment prepared by GeoEngineers, there are soil and ground water contamination issues on the subject site. Please clarify if Department of Ecology has been notified and the extent of clean up required by them. Also, the proposal includes grading and excavations for utilities and foundations and it is not clear what steps will be taken related to contamination issues. 2. Traffic analysis /Trip generation study is required prior to SEPA determination. 3. The survey lists a number of easements along with recording numbers and a note that they are unlocateable. Please submit a title report with a copy of all easement documents to help explain why they are unlocateable. 4. Please keep us posted if any determination is obtained from Department of Fisheries and Wild Life regarding any JARPA/HPA permit requirements. 5. Following are comments pertaining to corresponding item in the environmental checklist: B 8 (1): There are two existing businesses on the site, Triad Machinery and General Trailer Company. The proposed use is listed as truck body manufacturing operations. There is a lot of heavy construction machinery on site that appears to be part of Triad • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone:.206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431-3665 • • Machinery. Is the expansion for the current businesses or a separate business will occupy the new building. Please clarify the existing uses and the proposed uses. Also the site plan must identify the areas to be used for outdoor storage and whether the outdoor storage is for parking of trucks, trailers, construction equipment/vehicles or some additional materials. Please note that pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC), 18.38.020, Automotive services like body and engine repair shops are permitted in MIC /H zone as long as they are enclosed within a building. B 8(d): Please indicate the location of underground concrete vault and explain why it is being removed. It needs to be clear if it is an underground storage tank. B 1(e): Please provide the grade and fill quantities. This information is needed because on page 5 of Geo -tech report it is stated that significant amounts of structural fill will be placed on site. Also, it is not clear from the geo -tech report if the existing asphalt will be removed to make site grades work and then re- paved? It is also not clear if the entire site will be re -paved or a portion of it. B. Comments related to Construction Permit: 1. Half - street improvements are required adjacent to the site, along Tukwila International Boulevard and South 112`h Street. Improvements include, but are not limited to asphalt roadway; curb, gutter, and sidewalk; storm drainage, street lighting, channelization, and undergrounding of power. Half - street improvements must be coordinated with Tukwila International Boulevard, CIP program requirements. Please contact Dave McPherson, Public Works at 206 -433 -0179, regarding possible proportionate fair share agreement for half - street improvements. There is a 40 feet wide ingress /egress easement along the north property line and parking is proposed within the easement area. Please provide documentation that parking is allowed per easement documents. 3. Please give information about the location of existing freestanding and wall signs. Are any changes proposed to signage? If it is determined that existing signs do not meet our current sign code requirements, they must be brought into compliance at the time of site redevelopment (TMC 19.28.030 (2)). Upon receipt of above listed information, the City will inform you within 14 days if any additional information is required to further process your application. This application will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety (90) days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.105.070(E). This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 206 - 431 -3685. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner 1-r.01-2001 3:45PM FROM lir CKER CATO MURPHY 1206322287 P. 1 STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS, P.S. ■ c A 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 Seattle, Washington 98122 Tel 206/324 -4800 Fax 206/322 -2875 Website: www.scm - arch.com November 1, 2001 Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 4 Headquarters at Mill Creek Attn: Tony Opperman Fax: 1.425.379.2323 Project: Heiser Building Addition Project Address: 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Project Description: Building addition to an existing Truck Body Building. Jurisdiction: City of Tukwila Tukwila File Number E01 -026 In October 9, 2001 I submitted an application for Environmental Planned Action to the City of Tukwila. In our SEPA checklist we have indicated that an HPA -JARPA permit may be required because of the presence of the Duwamish River. However, there are some indications at present that this may not be required because of the site's proximity to the Duwamish River. 1 would like to request a determination from your office if we will be required to apply for an HPA -JARPA permit. I have enclosed the following that may help you in your determination: 1. Parts of that checklist that may pertain to storm water. 2. Part of the Zoning. Plan from the City of Tukwila showing our site and the Duwamish River at 1":500' scale. 3. Reduced Architectural Site Plan (not to scale) 4. Reduced Composite Utility Plan (not to scale) I understand that this permit will not in anyway delay the approval of our EPA application since SEPA approval is a pre- requisite for an HPA -JARPA permit (if required). I am hoping to hear from you soon as to your determination and or directions. Best regards, Jeffrey S. Araucto Project Adminstrator Cc: BTN 425.562.6273 Minnie Dhaliwal (City of Tukwila) 206.431.3665 1 11-01-2001 3 : 46PM FROM RICKER CATO MURPHY 120632228W P. 2 CITY OF T UKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: rukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA PLANNED ACTION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: S ADDITu3a LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. I' i 114,4;1 IVlTE i-"1k}W.. )3i-VD dg -' / z_ Quarter. Section: Township: 23 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: jqr 4PA'UCEt/ W 1H-y Address: 2a 1. KEcj(r Ave SLL TF S AT rLf l 61'/2Z Phone: (lac) 1 4-1.Sa FAX: (140 32-2 -2g7S Signature: Date: G: IAPPHANlLANDUSEAPPIsplan.dos. 06/13/00 3 FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT Planner: ' File Number:. { Application Complete: (Date: ) Project File Number: iZt= 0 I _ cv Z Application Incomplete: (Date`_ - ) 1 vIIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: S ADDITu3a LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. I' i 114,4;1 IVlTE i-"1k}W.. )3i-VD dg -' / z_ Quarter. Section: Township: 23 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: jqr 4PA'UCEt/ W 1H-y Address: 2a 1. KEcj(r Ave SLL TF S AT rLf l 61'/2Z Phone: (lac) 1 4-1.Sa FAX: (140 32-2 -2g7S Signature: Date: G: IAPPHANlLANDUSEAPPIsplan.dos. 06/13/00 3 11' -01 -2001 3 :46PM. FROM ICKER CATO MURPHY 120632228 P. 3 PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS (TMC 21.04.152) Please complete the following checklist to demonstrate that all significant adverse environmental impacts have been clearly avoided or mitigated. Please respond on separate sheets as needed. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Date checklist prepared: October 5, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Approximately Jan 2002 to Oct 2002 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None anticipated. 4. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not aware of any. 5. List an government a 1 . S vals or ermits that will be needed for your proposal. Washington State Department of Fisheries -Joint Aquatic Resources Permit (JARPA) 8 HPA; City of Tukwila Public Works Process; Demolition Permits; and, all the necessary Building Permits. 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposals and should not be summarized. 18, 432sf addition to an existing 24,396sf building for truck body manufacturing operations. Demolition of an existing detached 1,360sf stand-alone spray building. Repaving of existing on -site parking. Size of lot is 148,100sf. Agency Comments: 1 1 '-01 -2001 3: 47PM FROM alr I CKER CATO MURPHY 120632228. P. 4 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard. The site is located at the corner of Tukwila International Boulevard and 112th St. where Quarter - Section- Township -Range is NE-9-23-4. 8. Does this proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): mountainous, other: 2 'flat , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, The general description of the site is FLAT. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Mapped as Alluvial soil. Gravel, sand and silt found after geological borings. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, location and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor on -site grading is anticipated to bring the existing parking area to design elevation. Elevation of proposed addition to be raised 1.2 feet above existing finish floor level. 111• -01 -2001 3:48PM FROM RICKER CATO MURPHY 120632228W A LiCan`sesponses: 1) ace: Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The site is within 800 feet of the lower reaches of the Duwamish River: 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters: If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material, if from on site. None anticipated. Will the proposal required surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None anticipated. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not known to be within the 100 -year floodplain. See survey. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will not be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to groundwater. 4 Agency Comments: P. 5 11--01-2001 3:48PM FROM ICKER CATO MURPHY 120632228" P.6 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The sanitary sewer shall be tightline connected to the existing gravity sanitary sewer main located within Tukwila International Boulevard. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source(s) of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection, transport/conveyance, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff from paved areas South and East of the existing building shall be collected and conveyed by non - erosive conduit to underground DOE approved water quality device. Once cleansed, surface flow shall be released over a level separator device towards the south in accordance with the City of Tukwila Stormwater Development Standards. Roof water and surface flow from North and West of the building is to be discharged directly into the existing off -site municipal drainage network. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not likely. Mitigation measures are in place in the proposed design to trap all potential spills that may occur within the building. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All rain water down spouts and roof drains will be required to be tightlined to on -site drainage network in accordance with the City of Tukwila Development Standards. s 11 =01 -2001 3:49PM FROM irCKER CATO MURPHY 120632228 P. 7 Applicant Responses: g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No part of the site is known as an "environmentally sensitive" area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 47 people will work in the completed project j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: No change to existing use is proposed. The use is compatible with zoning classification. The proposed remodel and addition will be built in accordance to the City of Tukwila Development Standards. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. No housing units proposed. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed. Agency Comments: 11 =01 -2001 3:49PM FROM ICKER CATO MURPHY 120632228M P. 8 GA1/6 551) AIC /H IIIthIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIU► _ Itlitiltp1ltj► ; atilt= kr- a iii:,; `. IIt1IUtrtllltO RCt MI WNW MI WINN �r MINN .7 flail" —. 114 /1I —, C .1 .••1 MWmftrawinessom rr .•U�� NOM IOW w mow Immo WNW NMI IMMO 11 =01 -2001 3:50PM FROM 1 I CKER CATO MURPHY 1206322287 P.9 101-2001 3:51PM FROM ICKER CATO MURPHY 1206322287IIP P.10 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Associate Engineer DATE: October 31, 2001 SUBJECT: Heiser Building Addition 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard Planned Action and Informational Comments Planned Action — E01 -026 1. Project to comply with Geotechnical Engineering Report, by Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc., dated September 11, 2001. The environmental checklist should be revised as follows: B. Environmental Elements 14. Transportation d. Half - street improvements are required adjacent to the site, along Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 112`h Street. Improvements include, but are not limited to asphalt roadway; curb, gutter, and sidewalk; storm drainage, street lighting, channelization, and undergrounding of power. Informational Comments 1. A "Phase II Environmental Site Assessment" was submitted by GeoEngineers, Inc. on March 29, 2001. Applicant should follow the recommendations as outlined. 2. Coordinate half - street improvements with Tukwila International Boulevard, CIP program requirements. Possible proportionate fair share agreement for half - street improvements. 3. Provide a traffic analysis /trip generation study to the Public Works Department. King County Industrial Waste Program Department of Natural Resources 130 Nickerson Street, Suite200 Seattle, WA 98109 -1658 (206) 263 -3000 (206) 263 -3001 FAX October 15, 2001 Wayne Faux Controller George Heiser Body Company, Inc. 725 S. Hanford Street Seattle, WA 98134 Authorization 10208 -01 to Discharge to the Sanitary Sewer Dear Mr. Faux: The King County Industrial Waste Program has reviewed your request to discharge wastewater from the future truck body manufacturing and repair operation at George Heiser Body Company, Inc. located at 11210 Tukwila International Blvd., Tukwila, Washington, to the sanitary sewer. In accordance with King County Code 28.84.060 (enclosed), King County grants approval for the discharge of up to 900 gallons per day (gpd), provided that: • Approval from the City of Tukwila is received before discharge to allow for permitting of a connection to the sanitary sewer and assessment of sewer charges. • The discharge limitations and special conditions requirements listed below are met. Discharge Limitations Non -polar fats, oils, and grease (FOG) 100 mg/L There shall be no odor of solvent, gasoline, or hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg odor), oil sheen, unusual color, or visible turbidity. The discharge must remain translucent. If any of the discharge limits are exceeded, you must stop discharging and notify the King County Industrial Waste Program at (206) 263 -3000. Special Conditions 1. This authorization permits the discharge of limited amounts of wastewater generated during the truck washing process (body; chassis, and under carriage) into the sanitary sewer. Wastes or contaminants from sources other than permitted herein shall not be discharged to the sanitary sewer without prior King County Industrial Waste approval. Wayne Faux October 15, 2001 Page 2 2. Discharge of treated wastewater from the oil /water separator to the sanitary sewer is authorized subject to the following conditions: • No significant amount of storm drainage shall enter the sanitary sewer; • The oil/water separator sampling port or inspection tee on the outlet line shall be accessible to King County personnel during normal hours of facility operation. • The oil /water separator shall be properly maintained so that effluent from these structures does not exceed the King County discharge limitations specified above. If you propose to substantially increase the volume of your discharge or change the type and quantities of substances discharged, you must submit a new waste discharge permit application to King County. If you have any questions about this authorization, or other questions about your discharge, please call me at (206) 263 -3012. Sincerely, Arnaud Girard Investigator Industrial Waste Program Enclosure cc: Jeff Araucto, Stricker Cato Murphy Architects Mike Cusick, City of Tukwila Doug Hilderbrand, King County Eunice Verstegen, King County ldagheiser.doc l'° -15 -2001 12:54PM F A X FROM41014LEY STRICKER 12063289499 T R A N S M I T OCT 15 2001 COMMUNITY EVE LOPMEIT T AL/MEMO. • STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS 120 LAKESIDE AVE. SUITE. 310 SEATTLE, WA 98122 206/324 -4800 FAX 206/322 -2875 Date: 10/15/2001 From: Jeff Araucto To: City of Tukwila Dept. of Comm. Dev't. Fax: (206) 431 -3665 Cc: Project no: 01067.01 Re: SEPA Planned Action File No: E01 -026 supplemental document Dear Planner: I would like to submit the attached document stating that the property at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard is not within the 100 -year zone. The document was written by Baima and Holmberg, Inc. the surveyor for the proposed project. This will serve as supplemental to the documents I have submitted in October 9, 2001. Best regards, Jeffrey S. Araucto If total number of pages are not received or are illegible, please call 206- 324 -4800. P. 1 143_. -15 -2001 12:55PM FROM LEY STRICKER 12063289499 0H11,111 MULPtntJ(ta 1M. P. 2 PAGE 02 BAIMA & HOLMBERG INC. • October 8, 2001 John Olsoa SEACON 165 NE Juniper St., Suite #100 Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: Heiser Property Tukivila Dear John: Please consider this letter as verification that the Heiser property in Tukwila is not in the 100 -year zone. The property is shown on FEMA Map Number 53033C0645F and is shown as being in Zone.X - areas determined to be outside the 500 -year flood plain. Please call me at 425- 392 -0250 if you have any questions or need additional information. Very truly yours, BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. Shupe Holmberg; P£ PLS ove14016M. Coss 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH • ISSAQUAH • WASHINGTON • 98027 -3817 • (425) 392 -0250 • (425) 391.3055 OCT-08-2001 13 59 3913055 97'4 P. 02 City of TukrSA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: Oct 5 , 2AO 1 Applicant Name: GeORaliet Co., Iac. Street Address: '722 S . 1-1AHFORD ST • _. City, State, Zip: .Sl't`rl. f WA 60 Telephone: NO C2--76,005- DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. Rreft1N0( by JFilizPi s'. ARAuCTb S'W0 CXfo mURPHY ARcl%G'ts. 120 LA ve51DG 1A V6 , 1 310 S Pri WA q 8 22 C2t6) 32-4- yf8oa RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWI' A °C e 0 7001 PERMIT CENTER January 25, 2001 1 • City of TuSA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. et Continue to-Quesiion'3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. 41P- Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) - 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 - CP- Continue to Question 5 -0 ' 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate res , onse. iri Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 2 • City of Tull ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. - - -- Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. - . _ Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1-3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle a i ropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 • City of TukESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 4 • City of TuSA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both-banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 - YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish_River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 4 • City of Tub. ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but_do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described -in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 - 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 6 PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS (TMC 21.04.152) Please complete the following checklist to demonstrate that all significant adverse environmental impacts have been clearly avoided or mitigated. Please respond on separate sheets as needed. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Date checklist prepared: October 5, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Approximately Jan 2002 to Oct 2002 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None anticipated. 4. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not aware of any. 5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Washington State Department of Fisheries -Joint Aquatic Resources Permit (JARPA) 8 HPA; City of Tukwila Public Works Process; Demolition Permits; and, all the necessary Building Permits. 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposals and should not be summarized. 18, 432sf addition to an existing 24,396sf building for truck body manufacturing operations. Demolition of an existing detached 1,360sf stand -alone spray building. Repaving of existing on -site parking. Size of lot is 148,100sf. Agency Comments: • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if -any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard. The site is located at the corner of Tukwila International Boulevard and 112a' St. where Quarter - Section- Township -Range is NE- 9 -23 -4. 8. Does this proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENT 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one at rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The general description of the site is FLAT. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Mapped as Alluvial soil. Gravel, sand and silt found after geological borings. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, location and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Minor on -site grading is anticipated to bring the existing parking area to design elevation. Elevation of proposed addition to be raised 1.2 feet above existing finish floor level. 2 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Short term and limited erosion of on -site soils could occur if there is major rain event during the grading and foundation process, or before paving. The contractor will be required to implement a fully functioning temporary erosion and sedimentation control system. This TESC system will be in place prior to and during the earthwork portion of the project, throughout the winter months and until paving and foundation is completed. About what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site currently is totally impervious and the improvements will not alter the percentage of the impervious area. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. The site will be protected with silt fences and straw bales. All storm inlets near the site will be protected with geo- fabric inserts, in strict compliance with the City of Tukwila's approved design development criteria. Dust will be controlled by brooming as appropriate. The project will comply with the applicable grading and City and County drainage control ordinances. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed: If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, dust will be controlled by brooming and water trucks as necessary. The subcontractors will be encouraged to car -pool to the site to reduce the number of vehicles arriving on site. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None know of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The site is within 800 feet of the lower reaches of the Duwamish River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters: If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material, if from on site. None anticipated. 4) Will the proposal required surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None anticipated. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not known to be within the 100 -year floodplain. See survey. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will not be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to groundwater. 4 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The sanitary sewer shall be tightline connected to the existing gravity sanitary sewer main located within Tukwila International Boulevard. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source(s) of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection, transport/conveyance, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water runoff from paved areas South and East of the existing building shall be collected and conveyed by non - erosive conduit to underground DOE approved water quality device. Once cleansed, surface flow shall be released over a level separator device towards the south in accordance with the City of Tukwila Stormwater Development Standards. Roof water and surface flow from North and West of the building is to be discharged directly into the existing off -site municipal drainage network. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not likely. Mitigation measures are in place in the proposed design to trap all potential spills that may occur within the building. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: All rain water down spouts and roof drains will be required to be tightlined to on -site drainage network in accordance with the City of Tukwila Development Standards. s • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple aspen, I other Oak at existing landcaped area Mammals Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X Shrubs at existing landscaped area Other Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetations b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No vegetation is to be removed as a result of the development. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known of. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None known of. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other One Osprey nest observed on adjacent lot. Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known of. c. Is the site part of a migration route: If so, explain. Not known. 6 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs: Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for general lighting and power. Natural gas for heat. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Will use equipments with energy reduction features. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk or fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Spraying, handling, storing and mixing of paint products. Cleaning of spray nozzles. Welding and cutting of metals. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services required beyond normal police, fire, and emergency health services already provided by the City of Tukwila. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: All personnel handling hazardous materials will wear protective gear. Fire alarm system, fire sprinklers and fire extinguishers will be in place. Warning signs will be in place at doors to and in areas containing hazardous materials, and at cutting and welding areas. Required containment measures of hazardous materials will be in place. 7 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic equipment, operation, other)? Existing traffic and building operations noise may not affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term: Construction noise during work hours and days. Long term: General operations noise during work hours and days. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction and general operations related noises would be limited during work days and hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Industrial Manufacturing b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two stand -alone metal buildings for truck body operations and underground containment vault. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. 1,360sf of spray paint building. And an existing underground concrete vault will be removed and backfilled. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MIC /H = Manufacturing/Industrial Center -Heavy f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MIC /H = Manufacturing/Industrial Center -Heavy 8 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No part of the site is known as an "environmentally sensitive" area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 47 people will work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: No change to existing use is proposed. The use is compatible with zoning classification. The proposed remodel and addition will be built in accordance to the City of Tukwila Development Standards. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. No housing units proposed. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed. 9 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: 10. Aesthetic a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Highest point is approx. 38' from existing grade. The principal exterior building materials is pre - fabricated metal panels. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered on obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The structure will be consistent to the existing building. The new structure will be a metal building which is generally consistent to the surrounding structures. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce: What time of day or night would it mainly occur: On -site lighting on the parking lot but will be directed away from the site perimeters. b. Will the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site source of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior lighting will be shielded and not directed into adjacent properties and public roadways. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. 10 • • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known of. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. 14 Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways service the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. An ingress and egress driveway directly from 112"' and an ingress and egress driveway directly from Tukwila International Boulevard. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop. Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have: How many would the project eliminate? 50 privately - owned - vehicle parking spaces is proposed. The existing parking count is not reduced but increased and the remainder of the site shall be used for truck holding. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. The existing road system is adequate. 11 Applicant Responses: Agency Comments: e. Will the project use (occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Peak volumes: Approximately 47 ingress between 7am to 9am during work days. Approximately 47 egress between 3pm to 5pm during workdays. Non -peak volumes: Approximately 25 ingress/egress between 7am to 5pm. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increase for public services is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities. a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity(, (natural gas, waterf , (refuse service', telephone, sanitary sewe4, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity, which might be needed. No additional service required. Elect = Seattle City Lights, gas =PSE, Sewer— Valvue, Water — Tukwila, Telephone = Qwest, MCI, AT&T, etc. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 12 Geotechnical Investigation Heiser Building Addition Tukwila, Washington For George Heiser Body Company, Inc. • • Geotechnical Investigation Heiser Building Addition Tukwila, Washington For George Heiser Body Company, Inc. -- Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. September 11, 2001 Mr. Brian Yandell SeaCon 165 NE Juniper Street, Suite 100 Issaquah, Washington 98027 Geotechnical Investigation Heiser Building Addition Tukwila, Washington CG File No. 1175 Dear Mr. Yandell: • 17625 -130th Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425 - 844 -1977 Fax: 425-844-1987 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation at the planned building addition for the George Heiser Body Company, Inc. in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located on the southeast corner of Tukwila International Boulevard (Pacific Highway South) and S. 112t Street as shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. You have provided us with plan sheets for the project showing the existing building layout and that of the addition. You have also provided us copies of probe logs used to explore for hazardous materials on site and a site plan showing the probe locations. These logs were completed by GeoEngineers in March of 2001. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The addition will consist of an approximate 17,900- square -foot warehouse used for manufacturing. The addition will have three spray -paint booths inside. The long dimension of the warehouse addition will be about 200 feet. The warehouse slab will be close to existing grade. A dock fill is not planned. We understand that the building will be steel construction with a concrete floor slab. The existing building is reported to be on spread foundations, and not pile supported. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 2 Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 3 Alluvial "soil consists of geologically recent deposits from a river source. These soils are not glacially compacted and generally consist of loose to medium dense sand and soft to stiff silt with clay. Alluvial deposits can also contain peat and muck. Explorations Subsurface conditions at the site were explored on August 23, 2001, by drilling three borings with '� a truck- mounted, mud -rotary drill rig. Boring 1 near the center of the proposed addition was completed at a depth of 50 feet, and-Borings 2 and 3 were completed at the south and north ends of the proposed addition, respectively, and were each completed at a depth of 25 feet. The locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Samples were taken at selected depth intervals using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). The SPT consists of driving a 2 -inch outside diameter split spoon sampler using a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. A geologist from our company was present during the explorations and collected soil samples, examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, and maintained logs of the explorations. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented in Figure 3. The log of the exploration is presented in Figures 4 through 7. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches (unless otherwise noted) is shown on the logs. Subsurface Conditions We present a brief generalized summary of the subsurface conditions encountered in our borings in the following paragraphs. For a more detailed description of the soils encountered, please refer to the logs in Figure 4 through 7. The upper 10 to 15 feet consisted of loose to medium dense fine to medium sand to silty fine sand with thin (1 to several inches thick) beds of very fine sandy silt. Below that material and to a depth of 30 feet the soil consisted of medium dense, gray to black, medium to coarse sand (commonly called Duwamish Sand). Some of the samples contained sand and gravel zones. Below 30 feet in Boring 1 the soil consisted of interbedded sand and silt. A layer of very soft silt with clay was encountered between depths of 41 to 45 feet. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 5 crushed rock. The amount of repairs will be dependent on conditions following compaction. The condition of the existing pavement indicates that this is possible, as we did not observe areas with no significant distress. We expect significant amounts of structural fill will be placed on site. However, since we have not been provided with site grades, we include the following sections on structural fill. The methods described also apply to soil that is moved and compacted on site. Structural Fill General: Generally, fill placed beneath buildings, pavements, or other settlement sensitive features should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field- monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. The areas to receive the fill should be prepared as outlined in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection of this report. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free - draining granular soil, free of organics and other harmful material, and be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported, all- weather fill should meet these requirements and also should contain no more than 5 percent fines (soil finer than a U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. Lesser quality fills can be used based on weather and moisture content. We should be retained to evaluate any proposed imported soil. The on -site surficial soils will be moderately moisture sensitive. That is, they will be difficult if not impossible to compact. It will be best to complete compaction of the surficial soils following several days of dry weather. If this cannot be done, alternative methods of site preparation may be necessary. This can be evaluated at the time of construction. Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. All fill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 12 inches in thickness. Each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted•prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas and within 2 feet of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 6 least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D 1557 compaction test procedure. Fills more than 2 feet beneath sidewalks and pavement subgrades should be compacted to at least 90 percent of their maximum dry density. The moisture content of the soils to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum, so that a readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction. Foundations In our opinion, the use of shallow spread footings founded on a minimum of one footing width of compacted, on -site soils. An example of the one footing width is a 3- foot -wide footing should have a minimum of 3 feet of compacted fill below. It may be possible to achieve this compaction using a hoe -pac. Care should be used to not disturb the on underlying soils with the compaction. If this occurs, then an alternative method should be used. The alternative method could be using thin lifts (6 to 12 inches) and compaction with smaller equipment. For foundations supported on compacted soils as described above, we recommend using allowable bearing values as presented in Table 1, below. Footing Width (ft) Bearing Capacity (psf) Settlement (inches) 2 2000 0.3 4 2500 0.5 We consider the 2- foot -wide foundation as a minimum width, unless much smaller loads are used for peripheral footings. We can provide alternative bearing values for those foundations, if desired. Some increase in settlement may occur due to variations in the subgrade soils. The compaction as described above will reduce the risks of these settlements. UBC guidelines should be followed when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Variations of the above settlement on the order of 50 percent are possible. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 7 - Seismic Hazard The site is located within Zone 3 of the Seismic Zone Map shown as Figure 16 -2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). This corresponds to a Seismic Zone Factor, Z, of 0.30. This, in turn, corresponds to an effective peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.3 g. Site conditions best fit the UBC description for Soil Profile Type SE. We have completed a liquefaction analysis for the site. We used a magnitude 6.75 earthquake with a maximum ground acceleration of 0.2. Our analysis indicates that liquefaction has a factor of safety close to one (both above and below) to a depth of about 32 feet. Below that depth, the soils become more silty and the risk of liquefaction is less. Typically, a factor of safety of less than 1.25 is considered at high risk of liquefaction. Using the blow count data in the upper 32 feet we estimate a settlement potential on the order of 6 inches during the design seismic event. The reality is that given the nature of the site and existing structure, some settlement could have occurred during the last seismic event, but is not evident potentially because of uniformity of settlement and the type of structure present. The lack of evidence of settlement could also indicate that significant liquefaction did not occur during the last earthquake. Certainly, there were areas of the Duwahmish Valley that did experience liquefaction that caused impact to the surface. Therefore, we recommend that the above settlement estimates be considered realistic. Slabs -on -Grade The subgrade for slabs -on -grade should be prepared as outlined in our Site Preparation and Grading subsection where 2 feet of compacted material exists. Soils that are observed to weave during compaction should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill. Where moisture control is important, we recommend that at least 6 inches of free - draining material such as pea gravel be placed under slabs -on -grade to act as a capillary break. The capillary break material should be separated from slabs by a vapor barrier, such as 6 -mil plastic sheeting. An additional 2- inch -thick damp sand blanket should be used to cover the vapor barrier to protect the membrane and to aid in curing the concrete. This will also help prevent cement paste bleeding down into the capillary break through joints or tears in the vapor barrier. The capillary break material should be connected to the footing drains to provide positive drainage. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 8 Assuming a 2- foot -thick section of compacted fill underlain by loose sand, we recommend using a subgrade modulus of reaction of 100 pounds per cubic inch. This value may be increased by additional reworking of the surficial soils to a greater depth. Drainage Plans for storm water handling were not available to us at the time this report was written. We recommend that the ground surface be sloped a minimum of 3 percent down and away from the structure. The roof drains should be tightlined separate of the footing drains until the tightline is a minimum of 1 -foot vertically down gradient from the footing drains. Foundation drains are not considered essential, if the slab on grade is above the surrounding grades and a capillary break is used. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for use by George Heiser Body Company, Inc. and their agents, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We recommend that we be retained to provide monitoring and testing services for geotechnical aspects of the work during construction. As part of our services, we would verify site conditions found during construction, and compare them with the data obtained in our explorations and evaluate bearing soil conditions. In the event that conditions vary, we would provide recommendations as appropriate. We would also evaluate the construction to determine if it is in compliance with the design concepts, specifications and recommendations, and to allow for design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Heiser Building Addition September 11, 2001 CG File No. 1175 Page 9 Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have striven to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Doug Bath, PE Project Engineer EXPIRES 447/0.2- 1 Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Engineer DJB:CPC:nt Four Copies Submitted Seven Figures 9//4/ Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. IN • Vicinity Map • ©1995 Thomas Bros. Maps Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Phone: (425) 844 -1977 Fax: (425) 844 -1987 Heiser Addition File Number 1175 1 Figure 1 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR AJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL - GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY-GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50 PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: * 1) Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in general accordance with ASTM D 2488 -93. * 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D 2487 -93. 3) Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance, of soils, and /or test data. * Modifications have been applied to ASTM methods to describe KEY TO BORING LOG Ground water level • Blows required to drive sit sM — ML _ SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist- Damp, but no visible water Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table and clay content. SYMBOLS — Letter symbol for soil type Contact between soil strata — (Dashed line indicates approximate contact between soils) — Letter symbol for soil type (Weight of water) MC ( ) = % Moisture - sample 12 in. using SPT (Weight of dry soil) DD = Dry Density Cornerstone Phone: 425 844 -1977 ( ) Geotechnical Inc. Fax: (425) 844 -1987 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Soil Classification and Boring Log Key Figure 3 �_. SOIL DESCRIPTION B -1 Surface Elevation: V SAMPLES I GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. ---w / Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 10 20 30 40 50 Gray -brown silty fine sand (medium dense, moist to wet) Gray fine to medium sand with beds of very fine sandy silt (loose to medium dense, moist to wet) Gray to black, medium to coarse sand (medium dense, wet) Interbedded, gray to black, medium to coarse sand with beds of gray very fine sand with silt (medium dense, moist) SM SP/ ML SM Sp/ Sp- SM I I 1 I I I — 5— — — - 10 — - 15— — 20- 25- 30- — - - — LEGEND 1 Depth 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit driven. • Moisture content IL 3" O.D. thin -wall sample + Plastic limit NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types Impervious seal P Sample pushed S Water level TV Torvane reading, tons/ft' ' Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons/ft' and the transition may be gradual. Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844-1977 Fax:(425)844 -1987 Geotechnical, Inc. 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Heiser Addition File Number 1175 Figure 4 I . �� • SOIL DESCRIPTION B -1 (cont'd) Surface Elevation: U.S.C. SAMPLES w o c Standard Penetration Resistance z (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) Q W • Blows per foot 10 20 30 40 50 ML/ SM MH/ CH I T 1 — — 40— — 45— — — 50— — - Gray, very fine sandy silt interbedded in silty very fine sand (medium stiff to stif/ loose, moist) Interbedded, gray, very fine sandy silt and gray silty clay (very soft, wet) SM T 1 Gray, silty very fine sand (medium dense, moist) Boring completed at 50.0 feet on 8/23/01 LEGEND 1 Depth 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit driven. • Moisture content a 3" O.D. thin -wall sample + Plastic limit I NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types Impervious seal P Sample pushed .4 Water level TV Torvane reading, tons/ft' Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons/ft2 and the transition may be gradual. Cornerstone �� . Geotechnical, ::: 17625 -130th Ave NE, Phone: (425) 844 -1977 Fax (425) 844 -1987 C -102 •Woodinville, WA • 98072 Heiser Addition File Number 1175 Figure 5 l SOIL DESCRIPTION B_^ 1 Surface Elevation: v 6 SAMPLES I GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 10 20 3Q 40 50 Upper 2.0 feet contains oil and is black in color Gray silty very fine sand (loose to medium dense, moist to wet) SM I 1 I 1 I 1 I 5_ 10 15— 20- 25 30— _ — — _ = — • — — - — - Black medium to coarse sand (medium dense, wet) Rust oxidation color below 11 feet Includes gravel in18 -foot sample SP Boring completed at 25.0 feet on 8/23/01 _1 LEGEND Impervious seal P Sample pushed content Water level TV Torvane reading, tons/ft' Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tonsRY between soil types and the transition may be gradual. * Liquid limit 1 Depth 2" O.D. split spoon sample driven. • Moisture OE[ 3" O.D. thin -wall sample + Plastic limit NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries Cornerstone Phone: (425) Geotechnical, Inc. Fax: (425) to F 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 844-1977 844 -1987 Heiser Addition 98072 File Number 1175 Figure 6 I SOIL DESCRIPTION B_3 Surface Elevation: d c.6 SAMPLES I GROUND WATER DEPTH, ft. w Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 10 20 30 40 50 Brownish -gray fine to medium sand (loose, moist to wet) Includes 1 -inch beds of very fine sandy silt in samples at 6 and 8.5 feet Sp I I I I I I 1 5 10 15- 20 25— — _ — _ - - — T - Gray -black medium to coarse sand (medium dense, wet) Includes trace gravel at 23 feet -Sp Boring completed at 25.0 feet on 8/23/01 30— LEGEND Impervious seal P Sample pushed content Water level TV . Torvane reading, tons/ft2 Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tonsift2 between soil types and the transition may be gradual. * Liquid limit 1 Depth 7 O.D. split spoon sample driven. ■ Moisture 2L 3" O.D. thin -wall sample + Plastic limit NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844 -1977 _ Fax: (425)844 -1987 Geotechnical, Inc. 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Heiser Addition File Number 1175 I Figure 7 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 PERMIT CONDITIONS Parcel No.: 0923049152 Permit Number: D01 -329 Address: 11210 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL TUKW Status: ISSUED Suite No: Applied Date: 10/09/2001 Tenant: HEISER BUILDING ADDITION Issue Date: 03/01/2002 1: ** *BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS*** 2: No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Engineer and the Tukwila Building Division. 3: Plumbing permits shall be obtained through the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health. Plumbing will be inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296- 4722). 4: Electrical permits shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical work will be inspected by that agency (206- 835 - 1111). 5: All mechanical work shall be under separate permit issued by the City of Tukwila. 6: All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be available at the job site prior to the start of any construction. These documents are to be maintained and available until final inspection approval is granted. 7: All structural concrete shall be special inspected (UBC - Sec. 306(a)1). 8: All structural welding shall be done by W.A.B.O. certified welders and special inspected (UBC - Sec. 306(a)5). 9: All high- strength bolting shall be special inspected (UBC - Sec. 306(a)6). 10: Bolts installed in concrete shall be special inspected (UBC Sec. 1701.5.2). 11: When special inspection is required either the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division in a timely manner. Reports shall contain address, project name, permit number and type of inspection being performed. 12: The special inspector shall submit a final signed report stating whether the work requiring special inspection was, to the best of the inspector's knowledge, in conformance with approved plans and specifications and the applicable workmanship provisions of the UBC. 13: Any new ceiling grid and light fixture installation is required to meet lateral bracing requirements for Seismic Zone 3. 14: Partition walls attached to ceiling grid must be laterally braced if over eight (8) feet in length. 15: Any exposed insulations backing material shall have a Flame Spread Rating of 25 or less, and material shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. 16: All construction to be done in conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1997 Edition) as amended, Uniform Mechanical Code (1997 Edition), and Washington State Energy Code (1997 Edition). 17: Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 18: All structural masonry shall be special inspected per UBC - Sec. 306(a)7. 19: Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications, and,computations shall not be construed to be a pPrrnit for, or an approval of, ,violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to 1thority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. 20: All rack storage requires a separate permit through the City of Tukwila. Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed Structural Engineer are required for rack storage over eight (8) feet in height. 21: There shall be no occupancy of the building(s) until the final inspection has been completed by the Tukwila Building Inspector. 22: A Certificate of Occupancy will be required for this permit. 23: Ventilation is required for all new rooms and spaces of new or existing buildings in conformance with the Uniform Building doc: Conditions D01 -329 Printed: 09 -26 -2002 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Code and the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Quality Code, Chapter 51 -13 WAC. 24: ***FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 25: The attached set of plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 26: The total number of fire extinguishers required for your establishment is calculated at one extinguisher for each 3000 sq. ft. of area. The extinguisher(s) should be of the "All Purpose" (2A, 10B:C) dry chemical type. Travel distance to any fire extinguisher must be 75' or Tess. (NFPA 10, 3 -1.1) 27: Portable fire extinguishers shall be securely installed on the hanger or in the bracket supplied, placed in cabinets or wall recesses. The hanger or bracket shall be securely and properly anchored to the mounting surface in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The extinguisher shall be installed so that the top of the extinguisher is not more than 5 feet above the floor and the clearance between the bottom of the extinguisher and the floor shall not be less than 4 inches. 28: Extinguishers shall be located so as to be in plain view (if at all possible), or if not in plain view, they shall be identified with a sign stating, "Fire Extinguisher ", with an arrow pointing to the unit. (NFPA 10, 106.3) (UFC Standard 10 -1) 29: Clear access to fire extinguishers is required at all times. They may not be hidden or obstructed. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.5) 30: Fire extinguishers require monthly and yearly inspections. They must have a tag or label securely attached that indicates the month and year that the inspection was performed and shall identify the company or person performing the service. (NFPA 10, 43, 4 -4 and 4 -4.3) Every six years, dry chemical and halon type fire extinguishers shall be emptied and subjected to the applicable recharge procedures. (NFPA 10, 4 -4.1) If the required monthly and yearly inspections of the fire extinguisher(s) are not accomplished or the inspection tag is not complete, a reputable fire extinguisher service company will be required to conduct these required surveys. (NFPA 10, 4 -3, 4 -4) 31: Maintain fire extinguisher coverage throughout. 32: No point in an unsprinklered building may be more than 200 feet from an exit, measured along the path of travel. (UBC 1004.2.5.2.1) 33: No point in a sprinklered building may be more than 250 feet from an exit, measured along the path of travel. (UBC 1004.2.5.2.2) 34: Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when serving an occupant load of 50 or more. (UBC 1003.3.1.5) 35: Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. Exit doors shall not be locked, chained, bolted, barred, latched or otherwise rendered unusable. All locking devices shall be of an approved type. (UFC 1207.3) 36: Dead bolts are not allowed on auxiliary exit doors unless the dead bolt is automatically retracted when the door handle is engaged from inside the tenant space. (UFC 1207.3) 37: When two or more exits from a story are required, exit signs shall be installed at the required exits and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. (UBC 1003.2.8.2) 38: When two or more exits from a story are required and when two or more exits from a room or an area are required, exit signs shall be illuminated. (UBC 1003.2.8.4) 39: Internally illuminated exit signs shall have both bulbs working at all times. (UBC 1003.2.8.4) 40: Exits shall be illuminated any time the building is occupied with light having an intensity of not less than 1 foot candle at floor level. Fixtures required for exit illumination shall be supplied from separate sources of power for Group I, Division 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. (UBC 1003.2.9, 1003.2.9.2) 41: The power supply for means of egress illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' electrical supply. In the event of it's failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system for Group I, Divisions 1.1. and 1.2 occupancies and for all other doc: Conditions D01 -329 Printed: 09 -26 -2002 • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 occupancies where the means of egress system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. Such emergency systems shall be installed in accordance with the electrical code. (UBC 1003.9.2) 42: All exit signs shall be illuminated at all times. To ensure continued illumination for a duration of not less than 1 1/2 hours in case of primary power Toss, the exit signs shall also be connected to an emergency electrical system provided from storage batteries, unit equipment or an on site generator set, and the system shall be installed in accordance with the electrical code. (UBC 1003.2.8.5) 43: Maintian sprinkler coverage per N.F.P.A. 13. Addition /relocation of walls, closets or partitions may require relocating and /or adding sprinkler heads. 44: Sprinkler protection shall be extended to all areas where required, including all enclosed areas, below obstructions and under overhangs greater than four feet wide. (NFPA 13 -4- 5.5.3.1) 45: All new sprinkler systems and all modifications to existing sprinkler systems shall have fire department review and approval of drawings prior to installation or modification. New sprinkler systems and all modifications to sprinkler systems involving more than 50 heads shall have the written approval of the W.S.R.B., Factory Mutual, Industrial Risk Insurers, Kemper or any other representative designated and /or recorgnized by the City of Tukwila, prior to submittal to the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No sprinkler work shall commence without approved drawings. (City Ordinance #1901) 46: All sprinkler system plans, calculations and the contractors Materials and Test Certificates submitted to the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau must be stamped with the appropriate level of competency seal. (WAC 212 -80) 47: Maintain automatic fire detector coverage per N.F.P.A. 72. Addition /relocation of walls, closets or partitions may require relocating and /or adding automatic fire detectors. 48: Maintain square foot coverage of detectors per manufacturer's specifications in all areas including: closets, elevator shafts, top of stairwells, etc. (NFPA 72, 5- 1.4.2) 49: All new fire alarm systems or modifications to existing systems shall have the written approval of the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No work shall commence until a fire department permit has been obtained. (City Ordinance #1900) (UFC 1001.3) 50: All electrical work and equipment shall conform strictly to the standards of The National Electrical Code. (NFPA 70) 51: An aisle to and working space shall be provided for each electrical panel. An aisle width not less than 24 inches shall provide access to the panel and 30 inches of working space shall be provided directly in front of the panel. (NEC 110- 16(a), NEC 110- 16(c)) 52: Each circuit breaker shall be legibly marked to indicate it's purpose. (NEC 110 -22) 53: Required fire resistive construction, including occupancy separations, area separation walls, exterior walls due to location on property, fire resistive requirements based on type of construction, draft stop partitions and roof coverings shall be maintained as specified in the Building Code and Fire Code and shall be properly repaired, restored or replaced when damaged, altered, breached, penetrated, removed or improperly installed. (UFC 1111.1) 54: The maximum flame spread class of finish materials used on interior walls and ceilings shall not exceed that set forth in Table No. 8 -B of the Uniform Building Code. (UBC 804.1) 55: Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. Numbers shall contrast with their background. (UFC 901.4.4) 56: In order to provide you with the fastest police and fire protection under emergency conditions, please post your suite, room or apartment number in a conspicuous place near the main entry door. (UFC 901.4.4) 57: Fire Department lock boxes shall be provided for access to all fire alarm panels and sprinkler risers. The appropriate key(s) for access shall be placed in the lockbox. Lockbox order forms must be obtained from the Tukwila Fire Department. (City Ordinance #1900). 58: Contact the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau to witness all required inspections and tests. (UFC 10.503) (City Ordinance #1900 doc: Conditions D01 -329 Printed: 09 -26 -2002 • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 and #1901) 59: This review limited to speculative tenant space only - special fire permits may be necessary depending on detailed description of intended use. 60: Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. 61: These plans were reviewed by Inspector 511. If you have any questions, please call Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau at 2.06)575 -4407. 62: All existing non - conforming signs shall be removed prior to final planning inspection. 16' Environmental consultant shall provide on -site monitoring of excavation activities within the contaminated soil areas as per letter dated January 28, 2002 from Geo Engineers. Applicant is responsible for meeting all State and Federal rules and regulations pertaining to soil contamination issues. Applicant is responsible for obtaining any applicable approvals from Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) to work within the known contaminated soil areas. According to the letter dated January 28, 2002, from Geo Engineers, the contaminated soil is proposed to be stockpiled onsite during excavation activities for subsequent sampling and chemical analysis to evaluate the treatment/disposal criteria. If during that analysis it is determined to be a dangerous waste per DOE standards, it shall be disposed to a designated landfill and applicant shall obtain all required permits from DOE. Prior to final Planning inspection applicant shall submit " contaminated soil handlina and disposal report" that shall describe soil handling and disposal procedures and criteria used at the subject t and it shall be prepared by the environmental consultant who monitored the construction activities within the contaminated soil areas 64: ** *PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 65: Contractor shall notify Public Works Utility Inspector Mr. Greg Villanueva at (206)433 -0179 of commencement and completion of work at least 24 hours in advance. 66: Work affecting traffic flows shall be closely coordinated with the City Utilities Inspector. Traffic Control Plans shall be submitted to the Inspector for prior approval. 67: Any material spilled onto any street shall be cleaned up immediately. 68: Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented as the first order of business to prevent sedimentation off -site or into existing drainage facilities. 69: The site shall have permanent erosion control measures in place as soon as possible after final grading has been completed and prior to the Final Inspection. 70: Provide a street lighting plan and calculations to the Public Works Department under separate permit, prior to April 1, 2002. 71: It is the applicant's responsibility to have the surveyor review all the underlying easement documents to ensure that all conditions of the underlying private easements are met and no permanent obstructions are constructed where they would be prohibited by the underlying easements. 72: Provide new and restored street channelization per City of Tukwila infrastructure design manual and as instructed by City Public Works inspector. 73: Applicant shall provide all required as- builts and turnover documents prior to project close out. 74: Prior to final sign off by the City, the Geotechnical Engineer of record, shall submit a written letter /certificate stating that project was constructed according to their recommendations. 75: Backfilling within public right of way shall comply with City of Tukwila standards and specifications. 76: The water quality STORMFILTER shall be sized for high flow storm events as recommended by the manufacture, or a high flow bypass shall be provided. I hereby certify that I have read these conditions and will comply with them as outlined. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other work or local laws doc: Conditions D01 -329 Printed: 09 -26 -2002 City of ThkwiId Steven M. Mullet, Mayor October 1, 2002 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director John Olson SEACON, Inc. 165 NE Juniper, Suite 100 Issaquah WA 98027 Re: Contamination issues and approval to occupy for the Heiser property located at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard. Permit number D01 -329 Dear Mr. Olson: The City has reviewed the report prepared by GeoEngineers on the soil remediation activities at the property located at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard. We have also contacted Steve Bremer of Department of Ecology, Northwest Region office. Based on our review of the report and conversations with Steve Bremer, it is our understanding that lead and cadmium contaminated soil was excavated and disposed at a designated solid waste landfill. The petroleum- contaminated soil was found at concentrations less than those required for cleanup under the Model Toxic Control Act for the proposed use of the subject site. However arsenic contamination of the ground water was not addressed. Please note that the applicant is responsible under the Model Toxic Control Act to address all contamination issues. The subject site is currently listed as a contaminated site on the Department of Ecology's list. It is our understanding that the site will continue to be listed as contaminated site unless all contamination issues including arsenic in the ground water are addressed. The owner is responsible to meet all Department of Ecology requirements and regulations. This final inspection sign -off and authorization to occupy by the city does not include approval by the city related to the contaminated issues. The Department of Ecology is the lead agency addressing the contamination issues and the owner is responsible for meeting all Department of Ecology requirements. Steve Lancaster Director Community Development. C: Steve Bremer, DOE Geoengineers, applicants environmental consultant Heiser 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA PLANNED ACTION APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT Planner: 0 File Number: Et71 — c7z_ LP Application Complete: (Date: ) Project File Number: Pr o/ -vZZ Application Incomplete: (Date_ ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: IDO I _ S 2‘) NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: fiasbiz 13LILDIn/ ADD111ibf1 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 12 D 14K1 InTefi'LJ*11441 1.- pt. V.1) 0°123v -9 /sZ Quarter: Section: 9 Township: -3 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: jOrrilfT7 AM -t(CTA/ 1'YYU rpty Address: ju c. K 1De- / s&tITU ,�I �� 5? TL.L gg Phone: )'3u -/41g6b FAX: (zt0) 52-z 2g75— Signature: Date: G:IAPPHAMLANDUSE.APPIsplan.doc, 06/13/00 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKN!II 7001 3 PERMIT CENTER Oct- 05 -01. 1O:55A geo FIlser body co .ST ATE(*WASIII COUN I r t)r KlNu CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 .SOWhc# n,er Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9N188 Telephone: (2(16) 431.3670 FAX (206)431-3665 E muff: CukAlan( ci.tukwil ».wn 11 206 2 7135 AFFIDAVIT fW OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY S9 The undeasijtncd Mine duly sworn and upon oath stales as fullow6: 1. 1 am Jae cur -ut owner of the properly which is the subject ufthL. application 2. All slateme i. contained tU 1IIr appheanuna have heNI prepared by me or my agcrnL( untl are nth: and CNl1:Cl In the beta nl knowhrdge. thy The al+plrt•ation is hung submitted with toy koowlcdrr.+md consent. 4. t)wuer grants der. (: ity. us e,nptuyccs, agents. CnglfCdr%, GUnlfUClnrs nr °thet repro. a llatrves IhC risld Iu cntc/ upon Owucr runt plope', ykxatclalj721O 'NJKW_LG.A INTERNATIONAL SIX for the purp.sc of application ....kw, for lie time necCSSw y to complete that put pose, S. Owner rrgrc r. t++ bold the harmless for any loan ur y d; lmagc w persons or properly occurring un the private pmpcnly during the City's Cnlly upon the properly ly Un ICSS tie. Iu5S or damawe is the rL;sulr of lhC sole nCgliKCOae of the lily 6. The ('ny shall. :a its discretion , pane) the application without rt:fund of fees. if roe applk:ml dues non rr•_spond to .prcil'ic inquests for uartu on Ili- -Complete Application Chock within ninety (90) okays. 7. Nun•respon.lveness to u City infurnentoo, request (oi ninety (90) or mole days, shall he t■tusC u. cancel the applieaueal(s) without it 'mid of fee{. EX Fri iTCUat_ 7.4 _(cnykeil (VS*.),un J 19C7` 0, Wayne B. Faux (hl thin day personally appeared hea'ore due I\JA N Y uRD F A� lu on+• known • n h to Ix 111C Iwbvulunl W11.) ..cute: the foneong inslo.nrnl and urknr wkJb d a he i P urd e same 1 s /tl1 viluolry :tc[ anon decd fen he uses :mil purpose* mentioned herein. (Prins Mum) 725S._ HANFORD ST I Ad,4r.<.) SEATTLE— WA---98134. 106 622 7985 (11.itc Numhcr) i' IIItSt. RIBFDANI1SWi )RN'1011lil'URF:MF.tINnits % DAY OP 6F. NOTARY PLIIILIC in and for the StiTe of W;lshitb•n.n residu,gan _ Al t L - 1 N A —.. MA '-125 2O 01j °Q,�F� G - pA �e��. •9�s 3 NOTARY • 1* • PUBl 2` yam.bgY ZOP .-'1.O. ,' , OF W AS e.• ��, OCT -0S -2001 12:04 My •■■■■i...wn cxpires uu_ 20F, A22 '711 . 21201 97% P 01 P I711 .G e o E n g i n e e,r s r RE F!""' 'O SEP`e. PUBLIC Jrtrr4r s File No. 8984- 001 -02 GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Telephone (253) 383-4940 Fax (253) 383-4923 www.geoengineers.com SEA CON, Inc. September 24, 2002 Page 2 • Lead was detected at a concentration greater than the MTCA Method A unrestricted land use (ULU) CUL (250 mg/kg) but less than the MTCA Method A industrial cleanup level (1,000 mg/kg) in soil collected at depths between 2 to 3 feet bgs in boring SP -3 (626 mg/kg) located within the southern portion of the proposed building addition. Lead was not detected in soil at 7 feet bgs from boring SP -3 indicating the lead- contaminated soil might be limited to a maximum depth of 7 feet bgs. Area 2 — Petroleum- Contaminated Soil Heavy oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil at concentrations less than the MTCA Method A ULU and industrial CUL (2,000 mg/kg) in borings SP -3 and SP-4A at 2 and 3 feet bgs, respectively. Heavy oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in boring SP-4A at 6 feet bgs, indicating the petroleum- contaminated soil may be limited to a maximum depth of 6 feet bgs at this location. We understand that grading or excavation of soil did not occur within Area 2 as part of the planned building addition construction activities. SCOPE OF SERVICES The specific scope of services completed for this project is listed below: 1. Developed a contaminated soil handling and disposal plan for use during remedial activities. 2. Provided environmental services during construction activities within Area 1. 3. Collected stockpile soil samples from the excavated material and confirmation soil samples from the base and sidewalls of the excavation for chemical analysis to evaluate disposal and cleanup options. 4. Submitted soil samples to Spectra Laboratories for chemical analysis of total and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for cadmium and lead using EPA Methods 6000/7000 series and Method 1300, respectively. 5. Coordinated the transportation and disposal of the contaminated soil. 6. Prepared a report summarizing our remedial activities. SITE SETTING The site is situated on the southeast corner of the intersection between Pacific Highway South and 112t Street in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). The site is located in the northeast 'A of the northeast '/4 of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The surface of the site is approximately 20 feet above mean sea level (MSL), based on the United States Geologic Survey 7.5 minute Seattle South, Washington, quadrangle topographic map (1973). The general topography in the vicinity of the site slopes in a west - southwest direction towards the Green River located less than 1/4-mile to the southwest. The general layout of the site is shown on Figure 2. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 8984 -001 -02 SEA CON, Inc. September 24, 2002 Page 3 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES Nelson & Sons Construction Company, Inc., contracted by SEA CON, provided soil excavation services for the remedial project. We provided environmental oversight of the soil excavation work on March 6, 2002. The soil remedial excavation activities were monitored by a representative of GeoEngineers who visually classified the soil samples obtained during sampling of the stockpile and excavation area. Remedial activities consisted of excavating soil from Area 1 within a 20- by 20 -foot area around the location of boring SP -3. Soil was excavated to a depth of approximately 5.5 feet bgs. Approximately 75 cubic yards of cadmium- and lead- impacted soil were excavated on March 6, 2002. Excavated soil was stockpiled onsite during excavation activities for subsequent sampling and chemical analysis to evaluate the disposal characterization. Soil samples were collected from stockpiled soil and from the base and sidewalls of the excavation. Stockpile soil samples were analyzed for total and TCLP cadmium and lead to evaluate the disposal options. Confirmation soil samples collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation were analyzed for total and TCLP cadmium and lead to confirm the cadmium- and lead- contaminated soil was effectively removed to comply with MTCA CULs. Following the excavation activities, the excavation area was checked for the presence of groundwater. Groundwater was not observed in any boring completed at the site. CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS GENERAL Ten soil samples were submitted to Spectra Laboratories of Tacoma, Washington, for the following chemical analysis: total lead and cadmium and TCLP lead and cadmium. A copy of the laboratory report is presented in Appendix A. The chemical analytical data are discussed below relative to MTCA cleanup levels for soil. Stockpile Soil Samples Three composite soil samples (SP -01, SP -02 and SP -03) were collected from the stockpiled soil for chemical analysis. The locations of samples are shown on Figure 2. Total lead and cadmium were either not detected or were detected at concentrations less than MTCA Method A ULU CULs in the three samples. Analytical results indicate that TCLP lead and cadmium were detected at concentrations less than the dangerous waste criteria of 5 milligrams per liter (mg /1) and 1 mg /1, respectively, in all three soil stockpile samples. Confirmation Soil Samples Three soil samples (SS1, SS2 and SS3) collected from the base of the excavation and four soil samples (SW 1, SW2, SW3 and SW4) collected from the sidewalls of the excavation area were submitted for chemical analysis. The locations of samples are shown on Figure 2. G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 8984- 001-02 SEA CON, Inc. • September 24, 2002 Page 4 Total lead and cadmium were either not detected or were detected at concentrations less than MTCA Method A ULU CULs in the analyzed samples. Analytical results indicate that TCLP lead and cadmium were not detected in the confirmation soil samples. CONCLUSIONS Nelson and Sons excavated approximately 75 yards of lead- and cadmium - impacted soil during the remedial activities. Chemical analytical results from the stockpile samples for cadmium and lead indicate the soil was characterized as a non - hazardous material for disposal at ' a permitted solid waste landfill. The excavated soil was transported to Rabanco's Regional Landfill in Roosevelt, Washington for disposal. Copies of the soil disposal documentation are provided in Appendix B. Results from the confirmation soil samples indicate that cadmium- and lead - impacted soil was completely removed below MTCA Method A ULU and industrial CULs for cadmium and lead within the vicinity of boring SP -3. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by SEA CON and George Heiser Corporation. This report may be made available to regulatory agencies but is not intended for use by others and the G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 8984-001-02 SEA CON, Inc. September 24, 2002 Page 5 We trust the above provides the information you require. Please contact us if you have questions or if we can be of further assistance. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. c ML&, Terry R. McPhetridge Senior Environmental Geologist /4,11/1 Terr}'E. Parks Principal TRM:TEP:tw TACO \8 \8984001 \02\Finals \898400102R. Doc Attachments Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Appendix A — Chemical Analytical Data Appendix B — Rabanco Recycling Company Disposal Documentation Appendix C — Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use G e o E n g i n e e r s File No. 8984 -001 -02 N 0. co z 0 5 9 9 co 2000 0 2000 Feet Data Sources: Lambert Conformal Conic Washington State Plane South North American Datum 1927 This map is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing site locations. Data was compiled from Sure! Maps. The data source does not guarantee these data are accurate or complete. There may have been updates to the data since the publication of this map. All locations are approximate. -41r5 GeologoEngineers VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 8984 - 001 -02 TRM:RJW 09/20/02 P: \8984001 \02 \CAD \GW_SP1 GTE TECH EQUIPMENT / BOEING COMPANY CUSTOMER SERVICES Property Boundary / s, ssy tiV () ACE ELECTRIC AREA 1 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION AREA OF CADMIUM— AND LEAD — CONTAMINATED SOIL AREA 2 ESTIMATED AREA OF PETROLEUM — CONTAMINATED SOIL SEATAC FORD 112th STREET GTC Office Trailer Triad Office / / 0 GCT Parts / Triad / Shop Whse. Shop / Area / / Diesel AST /Waste O AST SP `���I SP -4 AREA 2 -Yard Ze / 'SP -8 Outside Storag - Shed Wash Rack SP -5 OiI /Water Separator SP -2\ Proposed / Addition / AREA 1 / / P -3 Paint Booth SP -6 HOLIDAY INN Note: Location of all features shown are approximate. Reference: Drawing entitled, "Site Map ", dated 5/97, by • SP -7 OVERNIGHT FREIGHT 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET EXPLANATION: SP-1 + SOIL BORING LOCATIONS AST ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK Roofed Storage Area Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. Geo Engineers SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 e J 1+ APPENDIX A, • n,e.ers APPENDIX A CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA ANALYTICAL METHODS Chain -of- custody procedures were followed during the transfer of field samples to the analytical laboratory. The samples were held in cold storage pending extraction and/or analysis. The analytical results, analytical methods reference and laboratory quality assurance /quality control (QA/QC) records are included in this appendix. The analytical results are also summarized in the text of this report. ANALYTICAL DATA REVIEW The laboratory maintains an internal quality assurance program as documented in its laboratory quality assurance manual. The laboratory uses a combination of blanks, surrogate recoveries, duplicates, matrix spike recoveries, matrix spike duplicate recoveries, blank spike recoveries, and blank spike duplicate recoveries to evaluate the validity of the analytical results. The laboratory also uses data quality goals for individual chemicals or groups of chemicals based on the long -term performance of the test methods. The data quality goals were included in the laboratory reports. The laboratory compared each group of samples with the existing data quality goals and noted any exceptions in the laboratory report. ANALYTICAL DATA REVIEW SUMMARY It is our opinion that the analytical data are of acceptable quality for their intended use based on our data quality review. G e o E n g i n e e r s A -1 File No. 8984 -001 -02 • SPECTRA Laboratories • 03/14/2002 GeoEngineers MAR 15 2002 Routing 0 0 0 f llp 2221 Ross Way • Tacoma, WA 98421 • (253) 272- 4850- - GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 "Fawcett Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Attn: Terry McPhetridge Spectra # 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 Client ID SS1 SS1 SS1 SS1 SS2 SS2. SS2 SS2 SS3 SS3 SS3 SS3 SW1 SW1 SW1 SW1 SW2 SW2 SW2 SW2 SW3 SPECTRA LABORATORIES Steve Hibbs, La Cory Manager a7 /m111 Proj ect: Sample Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Spectra Project: Analyte Result Cadmium < 0.3 Lead < 4 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead 140 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead < 4 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead < 4 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead < 4 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 8984 - 001 -02 Soil 03/06/2002 03/07/2002 2002030048 Rush Units mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg Page 1 of 2 0 Method SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B 0 1 • SPECTRA Laboratories 2221 Ross Way • Tacoma, WA 98421 • (253) 272 -4850 03/14/2002 GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 : Attn:' Terry McPhetridge Spectra # 6 6 6 7 7 8 8 8 8 Client ID SW3 SW3. SW3'" SW4. SW4 SW4. SW4 SP1,SP2,SP3 SP1,SP2,SP3 SP1,SP2,SP3." SP1,SP2,SP3. SPECTRA LABORATORIES Steve Hibbs, Labo atory Manager a7 /mlh Project: Sample Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Spectra Project: Analyte Result Lead 6 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead < 4 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead < 0.04 Cadmium < 0.3 Lead 33 TCLP Cadmium < 0.003 TCLP Lead 0.06 8984 - 001 -02 Soil 03/06/2002 03/07/2002 2002030048 Rush. Units mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/L mg/L Page 2 of 2 Method SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B SW846 6010B RABANCO RECYCLING = COMPANY DISPOSAL, DOCUMENTATION' , NT BY:, RABANCO; .. WEtY.::..,. TIME RATE SCE 1,0 '%BS 10 :59 03/20/02 IN 4E04b LSS :i1 a.m7- 03/20/02 OUT NET LBStt. :NET TTONS :.: RATE PER TON: $ 1,046h i star DV COSI OMEi SIGNATURE I HAVE READ AND AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE. AMOUNT : $ REFUSE TAX 3.60% 62420 31. 210 0.00 0.00 0. 00 TOTAL AMOUNT: $ 0, 00 SENT BY: RABANCO; 203327e11; AP4115-02 17:21; • RABANCO RECYCLING CO, A DIVISION OF RABANCO COMPANIES 2733 3rd Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98134 (206) 623-4080 iCKETNUMBER - • 4moompir PAGE 3/7 DATE:, 031 20/02 .TIME: 12:22 14897 — SEA CON LLC b 132— 1 048 ASPEN TRUCK #s..103 DUMP TRUCK PLACE: TUKWILA PRODUCT CONTAMINATED SOILS GROSS: TARE: 4,§ fiecyciad 97960 LBS • 37780 LBS We Ktiamast a CUSTOMER SIGNATURE I HAVE READ AND AGREE TO THE CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE' :" • 120G 03/20/02 IM OUT NET LBS: • 60180 -NET TONS: , .30.090 RATE PER TON MOUNT: $ 0. 00 REFUSE TAX 3. 60% : QE. �� TOTAL AMOUNT : $ 0. 00 i222 -o3/e0/era' NT EY:,RABANCO; 111080 . LBS • 391.612e •• LBS We athinaster — DV CLISTOMi3=1 SIGNATURE . I HAVE READ AND AGREE TO TH. E CONDITIONS ON TH'E REVERSE SIDE. PLACES TUKWILA 10 :52 03/20/02 IN. .. 10:59 03/20/02 OUT NET LBS: 7 192 !. NET TONS: 135. 960.:.::. RATE PER TON: $ 0.00 AMOUNT.: $ 0, 1210 REFUSE TAX 3.60%; 0. 00 TOTAL AMOUNT : $ 0. 00 SENT BY: RABANCO; • 1 � ` ` `� C9-) ``� BILL OF LADING 6)1\ PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SAIL 4)&5C REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 54 South Dawson Seattle, WA 9R134 Telephone: (206) 332 -7700 / Fax: (206) 332 -7600 This Bill of Lading augments the Master Service Agreement ("Agreement") entered into by • ._=-23 IIDP- A 0 +. 1-LC' 2063327611; AP 5 -02 17:21; PAGE ,5 /7 Certifiuttion Igo la` b8' Billing Acct. No 1 t.rci[r Product (:ode �.P ( . ('Customer ") and Regional Disposal Company ( "RI)C ") on3 l2_o[DY (date). The temrs herein are made a part of the Agreement. In the event of conflict between this Bill of Lading and the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement prevail_ RDC hereby authorizes the Wastes ( "Waste') described in Certification No4)-10 signed by Customer or arc), for disposal at Roosevelt Regional Landfill. Customer shall present a copy of this Bill of Lading with each shipment Location of Waste: 1 1 Q � TV w I ` y n +e. r na`twa delivered Method of Shipment: n Additional Fees (e.g., laboratory fees, transportation fees, special handling fees, etc. If none, so state): u btLDL 1‘o-klu PERFORMANCE DATE FOR RDC TRANSPORTATION: Custome sha make the Waste available for shipment no later tha�(datc). RDC shall transport the Waste no later than 3�� CO— (date), unless KDC notifies the Customer in writing that Waste transport shall be suspended or canceled due to RDC's exercise of its right to inspect or analyze the Waste (as provided in the Agreement)_ FOR CUSTOMER TRANSPORTATION: Customer shall begin delivery of the Waste at [check one]: Roosevelt Regional Landfill. 'Seattle "Transfer Station located at Third and Lander. Waste delivery shall begin no later than (date), and shall complete delivery of the Waste no later than (date), unless ROC notifies Customer in writing to suspend or cancel the waste delivery due to RDC's exercise of its right to inspect or analyze the Waste (As provided in the Agreement)_ CUSTOMER 'IONAL DIS • SAL COMPANY ignat re Signature jSlie Whittan oi - Sales Coordinator �n 1'rinle fi ame and Title V ctril l Dan- D etc AI.I. TRUCKS MUST HAVE A (" :OPY OF THIS BILL OF LADINO WHEN DELIVERING WASTE TO ".Ht TRANSFER STATION OR T()'lIIE LANDFILL. Revised: (NT ay:,RAGANCO; • 2063327611; APR-25617:22; PAGE 6/7 SUMMARY OP LOADS HAULED INVOICE #2123387 —C PAGE: 1 DATE TICKET * CROSS TARE NET NET TONS TRUCK # CONTAINER # Contaminated Soils 03/20/02 1556275 111,080 39,160 71,920 35.960 103 03/20/02 1556281 104,460 42,040 62,420 31.210 101 03/20/02 1556360 97,960 37,780 60,180 30.090 103 Total: 97.260 SENT BY: RABANCO; • RABANCO 54 SOLTI7I LDAWSON STREET SEATTLE, , WA 96134 (206) Zi;i2-7700 FAX (206) 766 -1234 April 24, 2002 Geo Engineers Attn: Terry McPhetridge Tacoma, WA Bill of Lading: 2063327611; AP 5 -02 17:22; PAGE 7/7. CERTIFICATE OF DISPOSAL 02 -1048 (see attached) This is to certify that NON - DANGEROUS WASTE as defined on the above referenced Bill of Lading was shipped by Sea Con, LLC from 11210 Tukwila International Blvd, Tukwila WA.. The waste was received by Regional Disposal Company transfer station in Seattle, loaded into Intermodal boxes and shipped via BNSF rail where in was disposed of at Roosevelt Regional Landfill, 1800 Roosevelt Grade Road, Roosevelt, WA 99356. The above described NON - DANGEROUS WASTE was managed in compliance with all Permits and Laws Regulating this Facility. Final Disposition: Subtitle D and WAC 173 -351 MSW Landfill Signature For Regional Disposal Company ' REPORT. LIMITATIONS -AND GUIDELINES-FOR USE ,f `� r� A'. 1 ' • • APPENDIX C ' REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE' This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of ' this report. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, PERSONS AND PROJECTS This report has been prepared for use by SEA CON and George Heiser Corporation. This ' report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, ' an environmental site assessment study conducted for a property owner may not fulfill the needs of a prospective purchaser of the same property. Because each environmental study is unique, each environmental report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No ' one except SEA CON and George Heiser Corporation should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report should not be applied for any purpose or GeoEngineers C -1 File No. 8984 -001 -02 • 411 GeoEngineers C -2 File No. 8984 -001 -02 DO NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in an environmental report should never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL, GEOLOGIC AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. G e oE n g i n e e r s C -3 File No. 8984 -001 -02 Clean Air Agency 110 Union Street, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98101 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dennis J. McLerran BOARD OF DIRECTORS TACOMA Bill Baarsma, Mayor Bill Evans, Councilman, Board Chair SNOHOMISH COUNTY Jeff Sax. Councilman SEATTLE Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor KING COUNTY EXECUTIVE Ron Sims KITSAP COUNTY COMMISSIONER Jan Angel PIERCE COUNTY EXECUTIVE John Ladenburg EVERETT Edward D. Hansen, Mayor BREMERTON Cary Bozeman, Mayor MEMBER AT LARGE Janet Chalupnik Ph 206.343.8800 1.800.552.3565 Fax 206.343.7522 www.pscleanair.org Working Together For Clean Air March 6, 2002 Jeffrey Araucto Heiser Corporation 11210 Tukwila Intl. Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98168 File No. E01 -026 11210 Tukwila Intl. Blvd. We have been notified by the City of Tukwila that you are planning to demolish a 1,360 sq. ft. spray building in connection with the subject proposal. We would like you to know that our Regulation III, Section 4.03(a) states that: "It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or allow any work on an asbestos project or demolition unless a complete notification, including the required fee and any additional information requested by the Control Officer, has been submitted to the Agency on approved forms, in accordance with the advance notification period requirements ...." The appropriate forms are enclosed for your use. If you need further explanation of this notification requirement, please call Teri Story at (206) 689 -4090 or e-mail at teris @pscleanair.org. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Steven M. Van Slyke Supervisory Engineer SMV /lh Enclosures: Notice of Intent Demolition Checklist cc: Minnie Dhaliwal, Project Planner City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 BAIMA & HOLMBERG INC. March 7, 2002 City Of Tukwila Planning Department ATTN; Minnie Dahliwal 6300 South center Bvld. Tukwila Wa. 98188 SUBJECT: Heiser Trucking Easements Dear Minnie: RECEIVED MAR 11 2002 DEVELOPMENT Our office has reviewed the easement descriptions that were provided to us by Stricker Cato Murphy.. Architects and Richard Booth with First American Title Insurance Company. All easements have been shown on the drawing or have been marked unlocateable to the best of our ability with the information that was provided to us. Sincerely, BAIMA & HOLMBERG, INC. Shupe Holmberg, PE PLS WhIS:bb /1140- 023MinnieDahliwal , 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH • ISSAQUAH • WASHINGTON • 98027 -3817 • (425) 392 -0250 • (425) 391 -3055 STRICKER CATO MURPHY • ARCHITECTS, P.S. • S A 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 S e a t t l e , W a s h i n g t o n 9 8 1 2 2 Tel 206/324 -4800 Fax 206/322 -2875 Website: www.scm - arch.com February 12, 2002 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Response to Comments dated February 7, 2001 for file number E01 -026 Dear Miss Dhaliwal: This is an item -by -item response to your comments related to Planned Action SEPA and Construction Permit. I am responding to the best of my knowledge. 1. The documents from the title company for the unrelocateable easements are attached. Unrelocateable easements recorded in the survey drawings may be easements granted prior or during the subdivision of the whole area and therefore may not be located within or close to the subject site. 2. The site lighting plan is attached. We are hoping that we have satisfied your requirements and that there will be no delay in granting of our permit. Best regards, C~ c Jeffrey S,.� o Project Adm nistrator 1 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 3 2002 PERMIT CENTER. CORRECTION LTR# 1 (F RICHARD BOOTH Commercial Title Officer - Unit C3 National Accatt7Lts Commercial Division First American Title Insurance Company 2101 FOURTH AVENUE. SUITE 712 • SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98121 12061728 -0400 FAX: (206) 615-3000 1 -800- 526 -7544 DIRECT LINE: 12061 615 -3008 E -MAIL: rbooth(i irstam.com 5053062 DEED Or EASEMENT GRANTORS, BRUNO..L. CAROSSINO and MAGDA T. CAROSSINO, his wife, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), in hand paid, convey and warrant to GRANTEE, THE CARTER OIL COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, an easement for a water 1ine'described`-as follows: Easement across the north 10 feet of Government.Lot,_1,,Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying west of East Marginal Way and the north 10 feet of Government Lot 2, Section 9, Town- ship 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., lying east of Primary State Highway No. 1 and a strip of land 10 feet in width adjacent to the easterly margin of said Highway No. 1 extending from the north line of said Govern- ment Lot 2 to a line 218.14 feet south of and parallel to the north line of said Government Lot 2. It is the consideration of this easement that Grantee shall maintain and keep in proper repair, without any cost to Grantors, the said water line to which this easement relates. IN wITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have caused this instru- ment to be executed this day of July, 1959. Bruno L. Carossino 7 Magda Carossino STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF K I N G ) This is to certify that on this --3,1 ./ day of July, 1959, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of aRhington, duly commissioned and qualified. III , :, OttiJk)( i,4.; .3. personally appeared BRUNO L. CAROSSINO and' MAGDA T. CAROSSINO, to me known to be the individuals described in and who exe- cuted the within and forggoing instrument, and acknowledged that.they signed and sealed .the same as,.their free and volun- tary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and :.::�.' r7a` v ,.�^^,- ",?rrt:Ti[.:.R....,:rr -x ....»; : .. id., w..;-.-. �,.:!, t::. of. �s�+" �f. rwtKia�Y�Ya:w�a•gpFia�S/�... ^ affixed my official seal, the day and year first above written. n ' rotary .sublic in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle. ,.:., ..-... The covenant of Grantee to maintain and repair the water line is hereby approved this -7)' day of July, 1959. THE CARTER OIL COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation By•. . Its . 5449765 UTILITIES IHEIV..AS;./3itt,INO L. CATiOSINO. and la,.DA. T. CAROSINO., his wife, RINALDO M. CAROSINO and LORRA7.7,112 Z, j.„CAROSIX40,,-! -his life and TERESA--,CA-10SINO:4.*-4fidow,. ar0-AliatArtg ;the -following„des- cribed property ,;.`14.1iaishingorix, County' of King cnereinafter:raferred atOre particularly described as .f0116iis: •-• • • . . , That-prtion-,:of GovexvAi.LOt 1 ',14.S4.c.tic:rn 10, • • TownshiPL 23.'North;:'Asitgi-'4-aiti;!1-1i-t..-,; - : of wet terly -of. Ea's t 1W ay, 1-ess City Seat t transpiss .on 1irk -o-f -Way ' ' • Vat. R.E.X.§:7;:ltbriegA,Qig6,.'`. ..'CAMS1170 his _ ' -.-.7-7;pa.-7ty situate •are the owners o • , : - King County,: State ,-6.farred to as "'Parcel 2") , wife ;' • in nor : • • -4`1:--,ti4;:-=',4^V$1[0.402Wit&4444. ' • • , - ' - . . . • ,refe'rred • • /AL N; (1---rc...in.af ter -. Gov ;271 • • z ;..-.:;;:+agc.T. ;C:LniS . . • t '2 t.''S • 7: :7:0;7..1; -•veyed • No. and sout:- Of o: .line of :id z t . 7 " '37 Z 11 _ . . .-.^: ,:.......;..,: unto ...h.-...‘ G-..--..--.-...-.. :..:-.^2.:•,.:-....-,._ --..-n, ....-2:, a-:.r.o:.--.s z.'....-1(3. 1.-..-. no-ztf..2r1; - - ....:f., • '. .i..1.c.,... c:2,1_-__--:. -.:::: -.-:a1-.-cel. .2 '.--.... and Le:or..- - ..i...a_ntzh.:.. :, 22..Sa..1:::::., .: .: on, acroc:-. the a..7.a ... __ _ ,.. : o: . ,..--,:-...--. - 2 21-,-.: t..... •/,_ 0-1 :::::.a. a O. 1-a31 1 haral,yoanv, and an the .)y give and under ing, in- of all tha . faic . _1-1 1 u The aka-leers hercby resarve the tap frx %inter at their ma gavel:use L'UtIS tap shall. be metered and paid n2 :;.7:6ttle Water Depart=ant, prcvi- and terminate upon grantees, their rigLt as) ms imenh(2") and hereby covuns= and Ins at the than 4uMmtP-...;.es ci d fl/Ct zt,141.: heirs or eBeisnat providing et their own expense a nmominchinter Lica from * City of Ssattle Eigter Main to the Section Line dividing tba D parcels bersin described. This instrument is for t befit of grantees, their heirs and =signs and the covenants herein sholl be dacned covenamte runnL1,7„ with the Land. ELY.W.TTF:D Ws4Ogrrcts,, this Z) dry of June, 1962. STAT7 OF WASEINCTON ) SS: OF I :1 Bruno L. Carosino -' • T. Cerosino QJJ--t-qac Rinaldo K. Carosino C.. r? / Lorraine T. Cardiino , V-, Teresa Carosino day personkaly appearod before re BRIM L. cAaosiNcl and !i2-VA T. CAMSINO, his wife, to me %noun tc be the individuals atacrlod in and who executed the within and fer-2going instrunInt, .tald acil-nowlcd3ed that they sizned the scne c thzir free and VOlUal- tnry act aad deed, for the 11:3C3 mnd purposes t'-ercia Lent.theed. (7.V Z1.4 under my hand and official seal this 7 \ day of Juac, i)62. • • . '77•141.:a • • , �. ... so 44 4J O C-0 U'} QQQ^ El 2 .Y a s3i.t a cA 0 • • 2609169 2609159 william perkins dealers' agency city of seattle statutory quit claim deed earl scott sh scott ab prato et al puget sound power and light company easement State of asebiagton. )ee . County of.airiR 1,'tbe underaaned. a eatery public in end for the said State. do hereby uartily that on this 31st dray of id•T 1930. Personally appeared before me Pearl Denton, end _Lucy C. Does, to me keen to be the Individuals described as seller end sec executed the mithin, and acknowledged that they signed and sealed the sear as teeir frve and voluntary set end deed for the uses and purposes therein arontloned. It witness anersof,1 have hereunto set by baud and affixed say► carping seal the day and year in this esrtitaeato first Mere mitten. (D.Rsotsrial Seal) Donald doselstiae (con. Da. Nara 19, 1934) .. notary Pablio is end for the mete sf IPssblagton. residing at Sent. _ -, 1481.594 . _ Piled for record at request of P. C. • Dantoa. atoms' S. .1930 at 58 min past 12 P. lt. Ds0tge A. Grant. %cnty Aadltor Sealers, Agency, Ina. To willies D. Pettus Statutory Qe1t■01e1m Dead (Corporate Pons). Qalt.Clats Deed The Granter. Dealers• roomy, Tao., a oorporstisn, for end in eonelderation of the sum of One Deller ((1.00) and other good .sd valusb1e. aonezdoratscn. In hand paid. mono; and q alt+chlms to ailliem D. Per7~tnos ell interest is the follosfng described real estate, situated sa the Comity of j Eirg, State of treehi> s • " • ! she South Fifty (60) feet et late 3Wenty -Gas (21) end (Vs) 81901 Pave (5) Omen_ Third I. Addition to 401 City a-Seattle, • In 'Witness la<eieaf, said corporation has caused this instruant to be emeeatad by Ito proper oflicere aitd its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this 22nd de,}r of Jnmsngr 1930. (D.A.Tm. Corp. Seel) - . • Dealers AVM% lea. »Sr Bahl W. Scott, President ly S. Ii. Scott, Secretary State cC Washicatton, Crafty at ling . On this 22nd day of Jammmy 1930.Detere se, tire audersigued, • *atm Aiblio.sn and tar tae State of Ilselsingtcm, duly aosr"stlseed sod slam, Personally appeared Saris Scott, and S. B. Soatt, .. to se imam to be the Preasdsnt sod eeeretary, respectively. of Dealers, Agency. Ins., the corporation that executed tee teragosag iaatrunact. end aelmundedged the said instrument to be tee tree end volt am m .• • set and deed of sand corporation for time uses and purposes therein seotfased, and oa mth stated snit they yam sntborised to evsonte the said 3aatrs:ient and teat the seal att+zad is the corporate seal at eald eosperatiao. Ihitasds ay band and official seal hereto affixed the day and year In this osrtiHeate eboIe srttan (S.G.eotarielSe.1) Bpeaeer Cray • I (Con. lbz. Sept. 17. 1933) rotary Psbl3o in sad tor tae State ct • aashington, residing at Seattle. Piled for record et request of Ii..D..Perkins t Co., Jars 8.1930 nd 20 min past 1 P. ii. IfPI: 3 "... George A. Great, Canty £editor _ .. A. B. into et al To Peget Smd Pone le Liget Comes, Basement For trea Fee iroik" —.1i- Aa/.yy..F11w.N6 u"ki/S • . DEALERS' AGENCY WILLIAM PERKINS EARL SCOTT SH SCOTT STATUTORY QUIT CLAIM DEED PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AB PRATO ET AL EASEMENT That the Creator.. tor and In ooeaidsrats of the .sem of Om end iohOD /sonars ( =1.00) paid he Grantee to tae Greaten. receipt ebereod' as here*0.orco.eledged, Sent, coengy out grant, 40 the 'Antes. Its Masora and assigner tee ?agnt, pr* s end aatbarity to eoastraet, erect. .3.t r. ae prato augusta prato gertrude seattle trust company henry judson harold smith improve. repair, operate and msantain an electric trenemiesics and distribution line, eoneiet1ag of a single line of poles, with neoeeeary braces. guys and enohora, and to place upon or suspend from such may- an, distributions and algoal wires, insulctors, oroso -was, transformers. end other neeeasary or convenient appurtenances, Gorses. over and upon tee following described lands and pre• raises situated in tto County of Sing, State of Zaohingtone.to -.its All of Government Lot 2. Section 9, Township 23 north, Range 4 East of the B.U., except road. The °enter lino of said transmission and distribution line to be located as follows: Beginning at a point 700 feet more or less south of the nostbeaet earner of said Lot 2, them .in. a westerly direction an an angle of 62.35' with the State Bead .#2, a dieteaae of 6C9 feeti tnenoe on en angle of 6•6, to the right, which line intersects the center line of said State semi Z. 17 feet north of the north end of a bridge across the Duwamish River. a distsaos of 108 feet. Together with the right at all times to the Grantee, its Successors end assigns, of ingress to and egress from said lande across adjacent lands of the Grantors for the purpose of oonetruoting, reoon• strutting. repairing. renewing. altering. changing. patrolling end operating said line. and the right at any time to remove said poles. wires and appurtenances from said lends. Also the right to tne Grantee, its successors end assigns, at all tames to out all brash end timber and trim all trees standing or growing upon said lands which, in tee opanioa of the C.n.:CAe, consti• tote a menace or danger to said line. The Grantors, tneir heirs, successors or assigns, covenant end agree that they will not do any blasting or discharge any explooives within a dietanoe of three bnndrel (300) feet of said line without giving reasonable notice in writing to tee Grantee. its successors or assigns, of intention so to do. Tae rights, title, privileges and authority hereby grented'ehall continue and be in force until such tine no the Grantee, its successors or assigns. &hall permanently remove said poles, wires end i appurtenanoee from said lands, or shall otheorsioe permanently abandon said line, at which time all such rignte. title. privileges' and authority hereby granted shall terminate. In Witness Whereof. the parties of tee first part hews signed and eomate3 this instrument the day and year first above written. (S.T.Co. Corp. Seal) State of Washington. A. E. Prato Prato Augusta 31. Prato Gertrude L. Pinions Seattle Trust Compaq By teary B. Judson, Vioe•Pres. : By Harold V. Smith, Asst. Secretary County of Sing )ea I. the undersigned, a notary Public, do hereby certify that on this lath day of May 1930, personally appeared before sae L. Prato, a widower and A. E. Prato & Augusta 31. Prato, bin wife, to as known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged that; trey signed tne same as tneir free and voluntary act and deed, for tee uses and purposes . therein memo • tanned. Given reader my hand and official seal tne day and year in this certificate above written. Edward P. Tensing (E.P.T.sotarial Seal) Notary Public in end for the State of (Coe. Ex. Feb 3, 1931) Wastaneton.residiag at Seattle nee x 2 to x State of California roasts: hCcr )cs County of San Diego 1, the undersigned. a notary Futile, do hereby certify that on this 26th day of Ear 1950, person- ally appeared before me Gertrude L. Funenion, a widow, to use known to be tee individual described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and vol.' 1tery at and decd, for the uses and purposes tnerein mentioned. ;::en under my hand cad official seal tee day and year in this certificate above written. (c.P.S.notirial Seal) H. Philip Soeeuercan notary Tublio in se" °es the State of j residing at y. ... 3028739 3028738 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECFEE _2.00 • ' City Light P.M. ;230410- 2- 302CASHEL »: ** *9.00 Ti6S :AGREEMENT, made this day by and between the City of Seattle City Light Department, a municipal corporation (hereinafter called the "City ") and US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, a Colorado corporation, its successors and assigns (hereinafter called the "Grantee "), WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of One Thousand Six Hundred and No /100 Dollars ($1,600.00), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the mutual agreements herein set forth, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The City hereby grants a non - exclusive easement to the Grantee, its successors and assigns, with the right, privilege and authority to install, construct, operate, maintain, inspect, reconstruct, repair, and remove an underground conduit system under and across the following described lands and premises, situated in the County of King, State of washington, to wit: A 10 -foot wide strip within the City of Seattle, City Light Department Creston- Duwamish Right of Way in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. and the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section • 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Cr) Washington, as shown on US West communications' Drawing No. Est 9026197, dated February 22, 1991 which is • attached hereto, and by this reference made a part O hereof. 11 2. The Grantee shall provide plans or drawings furnishing O details of improvements as installed. Cr) 3. Construction, maintenance and operation of the underground conduit system granted herein shall be at the sole cost and expense of the Grantee, the use of which shall in no way interfere with the present use of said property by the City. Should the City's property and /or facilities be damaged or disturbed by reason of the construction, maintenance or operation of said conduit system, the City may repair its property and /or facilities and the Grantee shall pay the cost of such repair. After construction, Grantee shall restore said property to its condition prior to construction. 4. The Grantee agrees that the City shall not be responsible for any loss or damage done to the Grantee's facilities within said easement area by reason of any construction, maintenance, alterations or improvements.performed on said property by the City, its agents or representatives, except such loss or damage caused by the City's negligence. 5. The Grantee shall at no time interfere with the City's access to and over said property. 6. The Grantee shall at all times have the right of full and free ingress to and egress from said property. 7. The Grantee agrees to indemnify and save harmless the city from any and all claims, actions of damages of any kind or description which accrue to or be suffered by any person or persons or property by reason of the construction, maintenance, operation, use or occupancy of said property by the Grantee. In case of any suit or action brought against the City by reason thereof, the Grantee will, upon notice of commencement thereof, defend such suit or action at their sole cost and expense and will fully satisfy the final judgment rendered in any such action. EXCISE TAX NOT R Co. .Deputy 1 9105300398 8. In the event that such underground conduit system be abandoned or removed by the Grantee, its successors or assigns, this easement shall terminate and revert to the City, its successors or assigns. 9. The location of the underground conduit system within the City's right of way must be indicated above ground. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Seattle has caused this agreement to be executed by its Superintendent of the City Light Department pursuant to Ordinance. 175644 and the Grantee has executed the same this 2 G " ;':• day of May . 1991. US WEST COL•IMUNICATIONS a Colorado Corporation a Municipal Corporation CITY OF SEATTLE By 1..�. �. dain Title M62 Rio oP_,rya nods By Randall W. Hardy, Sypetintendent Seattle City Ligh On (FOR CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF }:TN(: On this 25ti, day of ?4,rc1, 19 91 , before me personally appeared D. 1.. Dauphine , to me known to be the Manager Right of way Operations , Of US WEST COMMUNICATIONS, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and each acknowledged that said instrument was the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that thy were authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and of • . ' my official seal the day and year above written. f; .917Qq ' 11:4 47, 4l0 M o V J ,s j�1i/11Mll!. Notary blic ion —and for the State of.• of Washington, residing at Wnodlnville My Commission Expires: 3 -3 -92 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) 88. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I }stow or have satisfactory evidence that Randall W. Hardy signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute this instrument and acknowledged it as Superintendent of City Light of the City of Seattle to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Date: /i.•' ., r /! 2 ! / / /� , �Lf(1 Arm Notary Public in acid for the State of OSR A. NFj� •Washington, resi tng-,/ Q.,,` ON E1./ i at • ..7? . /��n • :u �OTARy�N.. *; My Commission expires 7- '4• - :'� t.*15.ti..c;,►► zf Op wASA;g0 • • • • • • • . • 9111201395 CA020A11431 EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Job F_st . 90 -2 -6197 R/W Rotoronco �1tet.Ss t M For and In consideration of 5500 . the undersigned. hereinafter referred to e5 Grantor(s). hereby grants a perpetual easement to Pacific Northwest Bail Telephone Company. a Washington Corporation. its suxossors and assigns, hereinafter referred 10 as Grantee. with Inc right. privilege and authority to place. construct. maintain. inspect. reconstruct. repair. replace. remove ani keep obstacles clear from Grantee's laci1lies consisting of UnderrreumLysmeleo f cnUnn flats 0 O O O N and other appurtenances as the Grantee may from time to Irene require over. across. upon and under the hereinafter described N property situated in g:1 r>J County State oI _Wag', I ny r nn and is described as follows North 435 feet of Government Lilt 2 lying F.a:.t of State Rand P1 lest City of Seattle Transmission Line 1ess Went 110 feet of South 23n feet trvn:lured parr, 1lellog South and West lines thereof In Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East , Said casement being ten (10) feet in width beginning at n point nn the westerly property I Inc running thence npproximntcly 145 feet to a point on the City of Seattle Transmission line located approximately 15 feet South of the Northerly property line and he ing a port Inn of the above described property. Grantee agrees to restore all property clnm:tged by its cnnstruet ion to as good or Netter condition than before cnnsrrurtlnn. Subject to easements and restrictions of reenrcl. Ll: Cr) Grantee shall at all times have the right of lull and tree ingress to and egress hem said property described above. with the 0 understanding Ihat Grantee shall be responsible for all damage caused to Grantor arising Irons Grantee's exercise of the rights (V and pncliges herein granted. Grantor reserves the right to use the easement for any purposes as long as not inconsistent with nor an interference with the O ; rights granted Grantee herein The rights. conditions and provisions of the easement shall inure 10 Inc benefit 01 and be binding upon the heirs. executors. administrators. successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto In witness whereof the undersigned has executed This instrument this Witness FORM APPROVED Pr( Cowsked Ps4kc Icranee OS %et6fgez /t4.4.60- - tP.Gtbo a It CAI vPnvtciltety PEERLESS CORPORATION (Individual Acknowledgement) ss Cavity of _._. On ws aay personally appeased wrote me krrown to me Io be flee maMauaI _ _. , _ , wno executes Mr loregang monument' and aeknowrerned mar .. sgred Ine Same eo .. . .. Moe and voluntary act and data kx Ine use. )Via pwDOces nnrern memrdned Gwen usOcrm)/ntnd and olllcralSeal Ifrn. day Notary Puekc viand for the Stale el muting at W controssron experts temperate Acknowledgement) Stale of__\40. Sa,,. 11153 County of 4' On tits aa_ ap y personally poarcd before me _110 t/,, f'3c�Vdx.J woo and saw he /Maas the ___‘.1111A*I0Ii.l dc✓ of the corporation Mal executed uro foregoing mslrumont. and acknowledged said instrument to bo Imo free and voluntary act and deed dt sad colo0rabon. for the was_ and purposes moron morurorred. and on oath stated that -tea wan /were authoszed to monde said instrument on beMll of Me corporabon Green under my hand and °Mcul seal ths- -ef 711 day 04 Notary PublicmandlorIhoStateof- residing at L.) ea • Myconenasonemoues 3 - Or • E12i8O16 i1/2O/1991 SCHEDULE A POLICY NO. 818449 -C3 AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: 53,500,000.00 PREMIUM: 53,973.00 DATE OF POLICY: APRIL 24, 2001 AT 3:30PM 1. NAME OF INSURED: GEO- HEISER BODY CO., INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION 2. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: THE NAMED INSURED 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED ON SCHEDULE A-4 ATTACHED. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE POLICY NO. 818449 -C3 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR.DAMAGE (AND THE COMPANY WILL NOT PAY COSTS, ATTORNEY'S FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF: PART ONE: 1. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTEREST, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. 3. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY PUBLIC RECORDS. S. (A)UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B)RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER; WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (D)INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES. 6. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 7. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION, TAP OR REIMBURSEMENT CHARGES /COSTS FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. • • SCHEDULE B PART TWO: POLICY NO. 818449 -C3 1. GENERAL TAXES. THE FIRST HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER APRIL 30TH. THE SECOND HALF BECOMES DELINQUENT AFTER OCTOBER 31ST. YEAR: 2001 AMOUNT BILLED: 521,954.78 AMOUNT PAID: $10,977.39 AMOUNT DUE: 510,977.39, PLUS INTEREST AND PENALTY, IF DELINQUENT TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 092304 - 9152 -07 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $999,700.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: 5525,400.00 2. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND SECURITY AGREEMENTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY, AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS AND SECURED PARTIES TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. 3. EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JUNE 3, 1930 2609159 (VOL. 1461, P. 574) PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND /OR DISTRIBUTION ' SYSTEM REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 4. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NOS.: FOR: AFFECTS: JANUARY 20, 1939 3028739 AND 3028740 WATER MAIN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SAID EASEMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE ITS EXACT LOCATION WITHIN SAID PREMISES 5. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: JULY 7, 1959 .5053N2. WATER LINE REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION 6. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: JULY 9, 1962 5449265 UTILITIES REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION SCHEDULE B - PART II CONT. 7. EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR AFFECTS: 8. EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: POLICY NO. 818449 -C3 TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: MAY 30, 1991 9105300398 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SYSTEM 10 FOOT WIDE STRIP ALONG THE NORTHERLY PORTION TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: NOVEMBER 20, 1991 9111201395 NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES 10 FOOT WIDE PORTION, REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION END OF SCHEDULE B SCHEDULE A-4 POLICY NO. 818449 -C3 THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF ICING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 469557; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 230 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY LINE 230 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 435 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. J -10/92 This endorsement is made a part of the policy and is subject to all of the terms and provisions thereof and of any prior endorsements thereto. Except to the extent expressly stated, it neither modifies any of the terms and provisions of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it extend the effective date of the policy and any prior endorsements, nor does it increase the face amount thereof. Dated: JANUARY 14, 2002 First American Title Insurance Company BY BY 2fible PRESIDENT ASSISTANT SECRETARY Page 2 of 2 CLTA Form 122 (Rev: 6- 14-96) • (Construction Loan Advance) ALTA Lender-!- ,rte 'cTMS` 0 SEPTEMBER 24, • . 1955 • a 1/F0110* Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION .1",, 2 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non- Significance Project Name: eiI Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: e OI - C)2.... (' Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Mailer's Signature: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Person requesting mailing: 11 Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other m b -"Q_ bri.or\ Af f) r 01" "` "' Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 12 day of . in he year `2002_ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: eiI Add. ( fi Project Number: e OI - C)2.... (' Mailer's Signature: k ' Person requesting mailing: 11 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION February 12, 2002 To: Jeffrey Araucto, Applicant Wayne B. Faux, Owner State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter is issued pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21- 04.156 and serves as a notice of decision that the application for the construction of an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard is designated as Planned Action and no further SEPA review is required. Project Background FILE NUMBER: E01 -026 APPLICANT: Jeffrey Araucto for the Heiser Corporation REQUEST: Determine that all impacts associated with the construction of an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard have been mitigated as part of 1998 EIS. LOCATION: 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The current proposal is to construct an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building. The proposed use is truck body manufacturing operations. The project also includes demolition of an existing detached 1,360 square feet stand alone spray building and re- paving of the existing parking and outside storage areas. DETERMINATION: The project is designated as a Planned Action and no further SEPA review or threshold determination is required. This decision is final with no administrative appeals. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Manufacturing Industrial Center/ Heavy 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Notice of Decision L01 -026 Page 2 of 2 Project materials including the application, staff report and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA from Monday Through Friday, between 8:30 am and 5:00 pm. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3685 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Decision issued by: L Steve Lancaster � ca. Director, Community Development • Cizy of Tukwila • Department of Community Development FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Heiser Building Addition at 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard File No: E01 -026 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The current proposal is to construct an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building. The proposed use is truck body manufacturing operations. The project also includes demolition of an existing, detached 1,360 square feet stand alone spray building and re- paving of the existing parking and outside storage areas. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Heiser Building Addition Applicant: Jeffrey Araucto for the Heiser Corporation Location: 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard Zoning: MIC /H Comprehensive Plan Designation: MIC/H III. REVIEW PROCESS This proposal was identified as a potential Planned Action as it met the requirements listed under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21.04.152. As part of this Planned Action review process, the proposed project is analyzed to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated as part of 1998 EIS and also if the proposal is consistent with the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The current proposal is to construct an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building. The proposed use is truck body manufacturing operations. The project also includes demolition of an existing detached 1,360 square feet stand alone spray building and re- paving of the existing parking and outside storage areas. The subject site is outside the 200 feet shoreline of the Duwamish River and is zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). Tukwila's Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) is an important regional center of industrial activity. Industrial development over the most of the sub -area was evaluated in multi -site environmental review. In 1992, a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared for the Duwamish Corridor master plan, a proposal to redevelop Boeing properties in the MIC over a 10 year period. In 1998, sub -area plan/EIS updates extended the previous analysis of the corridor's Boeing properties (about 650 acres) to the entire MIC sub -area (about 1,370 acres). As part of this Planned Action review for the current proposal, the impacts of the current proposal are compared to 1998 Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement in order to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated. V. CONSITENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan identifies the area surrounding the subject site as a Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy. The proposed project meets the goals and policies listed in the Comprehensive Plan for MIC/H area. Specifically, the proposed project meets the following goals and policies: Goal 11.1: Support the existing industrial activities in the MIC and development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people to Tukwila in the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. Policy 11.1.2.: Assist landowners in remediating site problems caused by contaminated soil. Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with .manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. 2 • • VI. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1 -3 — Concur with checklist. 4- There is currently no application pending for governmental approval of other proposals directly affecting the subject property. 5—In addition to the Planned Action determination, a construction permit is required from City of Tukwila. Applicant is also responsible for meeting all Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) requirements regarding contaminated soil issues and must obtain any applicable approvals from DOE. Applicant contacted the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and was informed that JARPA & HPA permit are not required. 6-8 -- Concur with checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -d -- Concur with checklist. e —Based on the applicant's letter dated December 3, 2001, an approximate of 440 cubic yards of fill will be imported to the site. An approximate of 150 cubic yards of cut near SE corner shall be used to compensate for shortfalls on -site. Additionally the soils present on the subject property have been documented to be contaminated. According to the applicant's environmental consultant (who will provide on -site monitoring of excavation activities within the contaminated soil area) an approximately 750 cubic yards of cadmium and lead contaminated soil may be excavated near the southern portion of the building addition area. The contaminated soil will be stockpiled on -site during excavation activities for subsequent sampling and chemical analysis to evaluate the treatment/disposal criteria. f-h--Concur with checklist. 3 2. Air: a -b -- Concur with checklist. c— Applicant is responsible for obtaining all relevant permits from Puget Sound Pollution Control Agency to address any emission to the air. 3. Water: a(1) -a(5) -- Concur with checklist. a(6)— All impacts related to drainage will be addressed and mitigated during the process of reviewing the construction permit. The project will meet all erosion and sedimentation control requirements of King County Surface Water Design Manual. b(1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist. c (1) — King County Industrial Waste Program has approved with conditions the applicant's request to discharge wastewater from the proposed truck body manufacturing and repair operation inside the proposed building to the sanitary sewer. c (2) — Best Management Practices to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system shall be followed. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of construction permit. d -- Concur with checklist. 4. Plants: a -d -- Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a —d -- Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a — The soils present on the subject property have been documented to be contaminated with cadmium, lead and petroleum hydrocarbons. Also, arsenic was detected in the ground water. The site is proposed to be graded during construction activities. According to the 4 • • applicant's environmental consultant, Geo Engineers, (who will provide on -site monitoring of excavation activities within the contaminated soil area) a work plan is being developed to document procedures during construction activities within the known contaminated soil areas. The work plan will detail excavation, handling, transportation, and disposal options of the onsite contaminated soil in accordance with federal and State regulations. According to letter dated January 28, 2002, from Geo Engineers, an approximately 750 cubic yards of cadmium and lead contaminated soil may be excavated near the southern portion of the building addition area. The contaminated soil will be stockpiled on -site during excavation activities for subsequent sampling and chemical analysis to evaluate the treatment/disposal criteria. The . applicant shall meet all. Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) rules and regulations related to contaminated soils and obtain any necessary approval from DOE. a(1)— Hazardous Materials Control Systems must be in place to address any spills or clean up practices. a(2) —Any impacts associated with construction/grading related activities and onsite soil contaminants shall be addressed by compliance with federal and state regulations. b (1) -- Concur with checklist. b(2) -b (3) -- Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a -1-- Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a- c— Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a -d -- Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a -c – Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c -- Concur with checklist. • • 14. Transportation: a -c -- Concur with checklist. d— Street improvements are required adjacent to the site along the South 112th Street and Tukwila International Boulevard. The improvements shall be reviewed and approved by City's Public Works Department and shall meet all applicable Tukwila Municipal Code requirements. The improvements shall include but are not limited to sidewalks, curb, gutter, pavement widening and street lighting. e-- Concur with checklist. f —The proposal was reviewed by the City's traffic engineer who determined that the impacts associated with this project were addressed as part of the 1998 EIS studies and no additional traffic impact analysis was required. g— Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a -b -- Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a -b -- Concur with checklist. VII. CONCLUSION The current proposal to construct an 18,432 square feet addition to an existing 24,396 square feet building is consistent with Comprehensive Plan. It is also determined that all impacts associated with the current proposal have been mitigated pursuant to the environmental impact statement. Prepared by: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner Date: February 8, 2002 6 / 11001.°. .au MUTT .da CONDO COMM I•00•01, _-s '71 0 uTw S? IT (ex0n0 04ee WNT) \ PO" 4 axone IG P•0O..RI ^NC 04 MI 0(1iL vW M117 .LS* La. 001 012 0010.1■04 No Pa.iM. -100 La. 0•0 0o 00107 3.09 0 SITE PLAN I. , 00' ,fl. O1 •.M.00 fl . •••100•900 • • . 0700•00 C•0 10•10.00 o.0 . 0-01,90 .r Im # . • COIHACT CrI..01004Yt x. •A• ma. C. 440 ..0040.1010 PM000 01.• x 010, O VOA •001•090111008 00000 IOW 0!•0.1 x .n V000 4. 0000100 - .07 0.000 • IP00.0 CP It oar 10101. 0171aoV L.00 r 10000010f IM OLA WM 000701011. MO MU .0000 0 1100 011 .000 • 0110.10 A' CLEAR a00.00ILLT I{y11001011RY1 £a 9*011,0104 L0Y r 0001.0100 .T LOMA MI 0117M10010 flla LA000! 10IOL 0110001 01007C AO* IL.4110IL.1. 01.00.0 0 NC. P.M. 01.70 r M1•!0 IMO .sP0. 1000000 'r WALK AT H.C. TRANS1TRON 100.4. r., 04..x..00 `/ WHEEL STOP DETAIL a HANDICAPPED SIGN 1 v1. 1101 TO eGYE �1 NOT TO ICALE 10 ♦•T 01.0CY CO10 I.O. r WI CST .N 1066 000 I r' DUMPSTER ENCL. • YOT TO SCALE r ar.1•1 1100 000 O.. 000 ac• 000 0000001000 PO 011010 +IC �: BICYCLE RACK. 010031901 ;`! DUMPSTER DETAIL (3- H.C. SYMBOL DETAIL 161 .47" TO eCA,.E aL 101 TO SCALE rat .0011.. 1..• 100 ..w r 4 0100 CO = XOM C O 01700 —. .0 OI000._ 0. o• c— i:wu�o T v.i .Oy.7 ►r1 nw X0000 5.1.0 11000 MA▪ MMY O nt auLrL (;+ aC.PARKING DETAIL Th H.C. • SYMBOL DETAIL NOT To x 1 s 111 2 000 I+r 4190•0.0 • A1.1 3 • • MEMORANDUM To: Brenda Holt From: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: 02/07/02 Re: Heiser Building permit: D01 -0329 Applicant was mailed a letter on November 6, 2001 and January 4, 2001 and the following items are still pending: 1. The survey lists a number of easements along with recording numbers and a note that they are unlocateable. You were asked to submit a title report with a copy of all easement documents to help explain why they are unlocateable. Based on review your resubmittal, the document refers to each individual recorded document for the exact location. Please include copies of all documents referenced in the statutory warranty deed. 2. A site lighting plan is required. Pursuant to 18.50.100, the following site lighting standards shall apply to this site: a) The minimum light levels in parking areas, paths between the buildings and street or parking areas shall be 1 foot - candle; b) The maximum ratio of average:minimum light levels shall be 4:1 for illuminated grounds; c) Maximum illumination at the property line shall be 2 foot - candles; d) Lights shall be shielded to eliminate direct off -site illumination; and e) General grounds need not be lighted. 3. We are reviewing the letter dated February 4, 2002 from your environmental consultant regarding the contamination issues and will inform you if any additional clarification is required. 1 STRICKER CATO MURPHY • ARCHITECTS, P.S. • 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 S e a t t l e , W a s h i n g t o n 98 1 22 Tel 206/324 -4800 Fax 206/322 -2875 Website: www.scm - arch.com February 4, 2002 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 • RECEIVED FEB 0 6 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Additional Response to Comments dated January 4, 2001 for file number E01 -026 Dear Miss Dhaliwal: This is an item -by -item response to your comments related to Planned Action SEPA and Construction Permit. I hope that this response will complete your approval for the Planned Action SEPA aspect of the project. A. Response to comments related to Planned Action SEPA Item # 2: Please see attached determination by Geo Engineers in coordination with the Department of Ecology. Best regards Jeffrey . raucto Project Administrator 1 JHN- 61 -2UU 1 :24 Geo _�:tl Engineers SEA CON 4258371585 P.02'05 • • SEA CON 165 NE Juniper, Suite 100 Issaquah, Washington 98027 Attention: John Olson January 28, 2002 C JAN it' 3 R ^r SEA L`�"z cON LLC Project Scope and Understanding Environmental Consultation Heiser Addition Tukwila, Washington File No. 8984 - 001 -02 INTRODUCTION GeoEngineers is pleased to provide this letter to SEA CON outlining our project scope related to the building addition construction activities at the Heiser Corporation facility located at 11210 Pacific Highway South in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located on the southeast corner of Pacific Highway South and 1121h Street at the former location of General Trailers Company/Triad Machinery facility. Heiser Corporation plans to construct the building addition on the eastern portion of the property. Our understanding of the project is based on information verbally provided by you and a set of construction drawings received by GeoEngineers on November 30, 2001. We also understand the site is zoned as industrial by the City of Tukwila. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATION We conducted a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the property in March 2001 prior to Heiser Corporation purchasing the property_ The results of the Phase II ESA are provided in our report titled `Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, General Trailers Company/Triad Machinery Site," dated March 29, 2001 and briefly discussed below. Boring locations are shown on the attached figure. SOIL Cadmium, lead, and petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil. Cadmium was detected at a concentration greater than the MTCA Method A Industrial cleanup level of 2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in sample SP -3 (4,5 mg/kg) at depths of 2 to 3 feet below ground surface (bgs). Cadmium was not detected in soil from boring SP -3 collected at 7 feet bgs indicating the cadmium- contaminated soil may be limited to a maximum depth of 7 feet bgs. (ienEnglvictn, Inc. 1101 11wcCLl Ave., Suite 200 Loma, WA 98402 'l *phoiic (253) 383'i9l0 &u (253) 383.4923 www.geoengineers.com JAN -31 -2002 15 :24 SEA CON January 28, 2002 • Page 2 SEA CON 4258371585 P.03/05 Lead was detected at a concentration greater than the MTCA Method A unrestricted land use (ULU) cleanup level (CUL) hut less than the MTCA Method A industrial cleanup level (1,000 mg /kg) in soil at depths between 2 to 3 feet bgs in boring SP -3 (626 mg /kg) located within the southern portion of the proposed building addition. Lead was not detected in soil from boring SP -3 collected at 7 feet bgs indicating the lead-contaminated soil may be limited to a maximum depth of 7 feet bgs- This lead - contaminated soil is located within the cadmium- contaminated soil. The soil will therefore be part of the stockpile procedure as described above. Heavy oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil at concentrations less than the MTCA Method A ULU and Industrial CUL (2,000 mg/kg) in borings SP -3 and SP-4A at 2 and 3 feet bgs. respectively. Heavy oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in boring SP -4A at 6 feet bgs indicating the petroleum -contaminated soil may be limited to a maximum depth of 6 feet bgs at this location. Ground Water Arsenic was detected at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A ground water CUL in samples front boring SP -3 and SP -5 (located approximately 90 feet south of SP -3). Ground water was encountered in borings SP -3 and SP -5 at approximately 10 feet bgs. PROJECT SCOPE AND UNDERSTANDING We understand SEA CON plans to grade portions of the site during construction activities within the known contaminated soil area. We also understand that the site excavation depths will not go beyond approximately 2 to 3 feet bgs during construction activities. Ground water should not be encountered at these depths, based on the previous investigation results_ We are currently developing a work plan to document procedures during constriction . activities within the known contaminated soil area. The work plan will detail excavation, handling, transportation, and disposal options of the onsite contaminated soil in accordance with federal and State regulations. The contaminants of concern in soil are discussed below. Cadmium- and Lead- Contaminated Soil The cadmium- and Iead- contaminated soil will be stockpiled onsite during excavation activities for subsequent sampling and chemical analysis to evaluate the treatment/disposal criteria. We will also collect confirmation soil samples at the base and sidewalls of the excavation within the known contaminated area to confirm the cadmium- and lead - contaminated soil has been effectively removed. Stockpile samples will be analyzed for cadmium and lead using the toxic characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) to evaluate disposal options. Confirmation soil samples will be tested for total and TCLP for cadmium and lead to evaluate disposal options and to confirm that the contaminated soil has been completely removed. We will provide onsite monitoring of excavation activities within the contaminated soil area. G v 0 tin g ; n c C r s Iilc No. 6984-00i JAN -31 -2002 15 25 SEA CON January 28, 2002 • Page 3 SEA'CON 4258371585 P.04-'05 • We estimate that approximately 750 cubic yards (approximately 1,100 tom) of cadmium- and lead - contaminated soil may be excavated near the southern portion of the building addition area at and adjacent to the SP -3 boring location. Petroleum Contaminated Soil If grading occurs in the area of boring SP-4A at depths within 3 feet bgs, the excavated PCS material should be placed beneath the footprint of the building addition or within an area of the site that will contain an asphalt or concrete surface to minimize introduction of water (leaching) or contact with human health or the environment. The actual location of the PCS material will be identified in a report that will be completed following completion of activities for future reference_ We recently submitted the Phase II ESA report to Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) at the request of SEA CON and on behalf of Heiser Corporation as part of the initial disclosure process. The report was submitted to Steve Bremer (Initial Investigation Coordinator) at Ecology's Northwest Region office in Bellevue, Washington. Mr. Bremer indicated the following information during a follow up phone conversation on January 15, 2002. • Ecology will evaluate whether the site will be placed on the Contaminated Site List (CSL) following their review of the Phase Id ESA report. • The construction project should proceed as planned and the "Work Plan for Construction Activities" would not require Ecology's review. • if we can confirm that the cadmium -contaminated soil was effectively removed from the site (will have to conduct confirmation sampling) then the site will be `logged out' from the CSL. • We also understand that Ecology wishes to review our "Contaminated Soil Handling and Disposal Report" that will be prepared following completion of the construction activities. if the GHC site is added to Ecology's list and Ecology believes the cadmium - contaminated soil has been removed from the site during the construction activities, then we understand the GHC site will be removed from the list at that point. • A report will be prepared following completion of the construction activities that will describe the contaminated soil handling and disposal criteria. I4► (i e n E n g i n c c r c Pile No.l9M -001 -02 JHrl— S1-2LJU2 SEA LOIN January 28. 2002 • Page 4 SEA CON • Please call if you have questions regarding this submittal. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers. Inc. TRM:TEP:tw Document ID: P:\ 818984 O011021Finais1898d0010212.Doc Attachments 12583 71585 P. 05/05 Terry R. McPhetridge Senior Environmental Geologist Terry E. Parks Principal Gcni_ngi nccrs F;A: No. 8984dOJ.1). TOTAL P.05 Minnie Dhaliwal - Heiser Building Additi. Page 1 From: "Jeffrey S. Araucto" <jeffa @scm- arch.com> To: <mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 1/11/02 11:07AM Subject: Heiser Building Addition Ms. Dhaliwai, I would like to know the procedure for entering into a Fair Share Agreement and how long it will take. I would like to know if our building permit process will be affected by it if it is a long process. Best regards, JEFF ARAUCTO Stricker Cato Murphy Architects (T)206.324.4800;(F)206.322.2875 • • STRICKER CATO MURPHY • ARCHITECTS, P.S. • 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 S e a t t l e , W a s h i n g t o n 98 1 22 Tel 206/324 -4800 Fax 206/322 -2875 Website: www.scm - arch.com January 10, 2002 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED JAN 10.,2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Response to Comments dated January 4, 2001 for file number E01 -026 Dear Miss Dhaliwal: This is an item -by -item response to your comments related to Planned Action SEPA and Construction Permit. I am responding to the best of my knowledge. A. Response to comments related to Planned Action SEPA 1. You have confirmed in the January 4, 2001 letter that it has been determined that there is no traffic analysis /trip generation study required. 2. Our response with respect to the Department of Ecology clean -up standards issue will be sent to you upon completion. B. Response to comments related to Construction Permit 1. How and when does Heiser Body Company need to enter into the Fair Share Agreement with the City of Tukwila for a future 12" waterline and appurtenances within South 112th Street? 2. We are awaiting the determination letter of the Director of Public Works with respect to the Proportionate Fair Share Agreement for the half- street improvements. 3. Please refer to the copy of the statutory deed attached. It states there that these easements would have to be located per where these underground utilities are located. These utilities will be field verified prior to excavation. 4. Please refer to the attached document for the revocation of the 40 -foot ingress /egress easements. It was revoked in November 15, 1971. This is the best copy and I believe that it is readable. 5. Site lighting will be incorporated in the site plan. We will submit to you a copy upon completion. Best reg Jeffrey S. ' o Project Administrator 1 20010424001824 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: GEO. HEISER BODY CO., INC. Address 725 S. HANFORD City /State SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134 Name Statutory Warranty Deed E1813312 04/24/2001 16:39 KING COUNTY, UA . THE GRANTOR EAST FORK CORPORATION, AN OREGON CORPORATION for and in consideration of $3,5-00,000.00 .PAID TO AN ACCOMMODATOR PURSUANT O AN:IRC 1031 EXCHANGE in hand paid, conveys and wan-ants to GEO. HEISER BODY CO. INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION the following described real estate, situated in the County of PAGE 091 OF 001 First AmericanTitle Insurance Company I .N (this space for title company use only) KING , State of Washington: LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SUBJECT TO PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF: Assessor's Property Tax Parcel/Account Number(s): 092304 - 9152 -07 GOVT LOT 2 SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 23N RANGE 4E Dated APRIL EAST FORK CORPORATION, AN 2001 GINA L. MORROW ITS: PRESIDENT LPB -10 (11/96) STATE OF WASHINGTON, l ss. ACKNOWLEDGMENT - Individual J} County of On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official, seal this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. County of KING On this24thday of APRIL x001 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared GINA L. NIORRCXnI nix to me known to be the • Presidents aetMIOQCOMMItXof EAST FORK{ CORPORATION t-eiiecuferi -8te -fare - -- - -- - - _ . .. olentary -- gerng- rnstrum _ S act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that SHE WAS authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said corporation: ACKNOWLEDGMENT - Corporate Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. WA-46A (11/96) ihift�ry kt5�s • � :6 0 .. .�+4 d1 �11 vA rs: ota ublic in and for thy. le• PQi residing at SEATTLE rt' .9��'•, .. • My appointment expires MAY ;3..17 2t 3'' JUDY FREDRI a • This jurat is . page of and is attached to dated • • EXHIBIT "A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 469557; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., 1N KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 3909048; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 230 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2 A DISTANCE - OF 110 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID HIGHWAY LINE 230 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 435 FEET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 110 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO: EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JUNE 3, 1930 2609159 (VOL. 1461, P. 574) PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND /OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED • THEREIN: RECORDED: JANUARY 20, 1939 RECORDING NOS.: FOR: AFFECTS: 3028739 AND 3028740 WATER MAIN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SAID EASEMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE ITS EXACT LOCATION WITHIN SAID PREMISES EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: JULY 7, 1959 5 53062 WATER LINE REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION continued' EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JULY 9, 1962 5449765 UTILITIES RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: FOR: AFFECTS: *- TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXAC LOCATION EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 25, 1969 RECORDING NOS.: 64 75006 AND 7202290168 FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AFFECTS: NORTHERLY 40 FEET EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: MAY 30, 1991 9105300398 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SYSTEM i1/15 )7l 10 FOOT WIDE STRIP ALONG THE NORTHERLY PORTION EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED . THEREIN: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 20, 1991 9111201395 NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINES 10 FOOT •oz WIDE FOR-T1� _ _.. RECORDED. RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: �V otD RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: .AFFECTS: FOR THE EXACT LOCATION UNRECORDED LEASES IN FAVOR OF: TRIAD MACHINERY GENERAL TRAILER PARTS LLC INSTRUMENT 7202290168 - • -: ItOU:atihovebirsintified. that. the endensignedi Steve dvatter.. •• *ads. ne.r0h7:S1eet te'reeCke that Oerininlasenentsdated.lebenrif 24,.1969 sati.fi/e4 at 140441*th ta'a Xing Came, Audi!.ay, a oopy of WhigiftsNlordto ettnehed. • .. In ancordanee with the terse of meld aaseeent the sane Shall and Veld at the end or mixt, days time after Mir receive this . notice. 11/1.5/01 TRU 15:14 FAX 253.4 571 PATCO .m vvu it 003 • • -44c -ii.i. 6X ?Sono 1 o, l G� WOG UNSIDIAS A. P. GOA= is the reeard owner of the following •, .- deotsr1be4 property IS Nibs Counter, geshiugtof s . ' That portiga otthe North 4, feet of dovtrnso4t eitl2 a Section 9 Town+sbiP 23 Port , e 4.8 NH., L 6 b dee State utg uwJ No. I ea cantered to bha Stets of Washington 7 ao reoordsd titdor Audi tupettier C0 oe �t6955p .A QXCE T th Sri. ortt t Lot 2, in Section 9, !Gunship F50CBor t3t►b Pos�1On of W.P1 i ae tol3 sw . 23 nth, lie 4 Taast Wan, dasoribed �y gegkmirig at tote lntersrction of tChm • Sonth line or the . North 435 r soot of .Said 6oewsrnmeat Lot 2 Wi.t h. the Easter) y line of maid • primary Statte * Ltl'wai No..I eta conv '11 to the Stone of :lnehittator by dead recorded antler Auditor's Pilo No. 3909048; :.henna Northerl along said Easterly line 230 feet; thence Eas: parallel with the .firth lire of said Govern +t Let .2; a distanoe of 110:foet:i. th nce Southerly, 0=01101 5.th said hightail litre 210 .eet to South line or said. Werth b35 .feet-. thecae hest along Bata South itne ilo teat to the :point of beginning: a► : GRAI B Ls ..Ver4has1it8 b7 moat feet the tollo r1.ng • tra�t�s srsys dseari'bsd prOpertT in King CountY, Wad` Ali, :.hat .portion of Gover nment ' .Lot11, Seo taat ti 10 T s own p23 North, Same 4 Nast, W.11, in K1n{i " . North of the Mcntaaitsh Elver or 10 th of the Gover ment: =eazd er line slang the WoX th n of d river: arid. test of .no Weston./ line or Shat qnt . portions as fond a:teZ by 95`7 for trunasiss_oa lime Caut•i Superior ny po sesso 7 5ht.Sellers> have :hereto lines! 'but.,•fet�•*�e sal► poseeasasr7 and r+CCEPT all wilting ooUAt7 roads, ALSO =2P T that portion thereof daaoribed as follows: . oossnotng.at s int on the West line of saaid Gove:r.=ent : I, lying nth O °321400 vest 636.35 feat. ram theti ore list x c . thereat and running thence th . 9rL1120' 3 s9 ,eat t:o net .-:a the North lime of said Governmen point or beginning; thence North 69 471.10• a"`ast 514. feet :are or loget o tae sester3,y line of East We.rgiR...: 7: ttoate ,;;.::t:t .6 olio 50. meet along said Weater.S lino to the Duwa fish hive- Cheney ,l tterly aloe wa the cish giver to o point vhtt. zee. SoUth ?01! 50" East from the trace pok►b 6 sntngl t. her ce . North 20° West tto the trite pebi wad G. for • all, existtin g waver Vries. WEE MAS A. P. t2ATZ$R•S. property borders on: Primary State t;:ga:- way No. 1 and Saes (4AZ'g property borders on dast Marginal We7. IG rd' 224$ both parties are . interested io a► Bast: Dement i" r • islgreaa awl egress to rriza ry State 3iab�y Way, nom therefore , . BBB anD IN CONSIDRATION OP NGr.,Ai.'?2O X$ S cosrA • e 00 4 herein .swd the mutual easements grated herein the parties agree to grant to each Other the foliating easements for ingress and egress to the Primary State Siglaray No. 1 end to . East '1iaeginal Noy en the Properties as described below. These sarcasms shell be personal to eaab of the 'Parties hereto gad do lot' ras . a th the Amid end rye► be revoked by either pert, bl atvlfB 'to the others party arty (b0) days . written notice of- relocation.' • • Al. P. GiONSII dealt hereby' 6rant to STSVS OAST= the f r o'e OD aesoribed easement, to ran to SUFIC liAAMR pe •J Atter& oonditLot 3 0 The l3 forty (4o) feet 7.n width of that pottioa of t. N de�vernaent Lot 2.. litigation 9. teanshtP 23 , ratee t a3t east, Vat., in King COMM, Neshingtea, lying _easterly or the 5a east line Ot. Stet. Nightoay Na. 1, end .]?ifg sottttateseorl7o ti the tr Lasiea line right of al: as condemned in Sing Superior Court Cease No. 469357 PCIl 60 IN odas1=34110 of the aberenasetent, S'.K''VS C3:. 3 doe.' hereby ,grunt to.L. P. G3LTZSR•the following described eaae.:.er=, to run to A. P. =Zia perietnally and updex the above cautittonas The northerly forty (40 flat in width of that portion. o: government Lot I, in section 10, township 23 north, range :s east, +t.]4., in Zia& County, Vathingtou.'lyirg westerly o: =he west line of East NarginalNay, std lying sou herl Yia: mho trans S iaf line as condemned in Xing Cause No. 469957. m =TN= Mum the parties hereto bare exaoaad twig i e trtmeat this 'ZJay of February 1969. • .:. 400'4 1 �y • ► 5 L32 0? ea CGt1`v 0? BAG On this. day personally appeared before me L. y. USAir S and Si�V$ 3U1.'ZS$, to Me known to be the i0dlvtaiJals described in shd exenutet the within end foresoing 'inetreement, and aol nowledged that •utZned the sates os their free and voluntary stet and deed, for the puiposee thereiU *entieeed. a GIVEN udder my band end official seal this 24•1.14aY of 1969• VO4LIC in and for the grate of Vashingten, residing at Seattle • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 4, 2002. Jeffrey Araucto 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 Seattle WA 98122 Re: Pending items for Heiser Building Addition- SEPA and building permit applications. File numbers E01 -026 and DO1 -329. Dear Mr. Araucto: This is to follow up our meeting on December 19, 2001. Following is the summary of items discussed at the meeting and a list of items required to further process your applications: A. Comments related to Planned Action SEPA 1. The Traffic /Transportation Division has determined that a traffic analysis /trip generation study is not required for this project. 2. Based on the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment prepared by GeoEngineers, there are soil and ground water contamination issues on the subject site. You were asked to please clarify if Department of Ecology has been notified and the extent of clean up required by them in the previous letter dated November 6, 2001. Also, the proposal includes grading and excavations for utilities and foundations and it is not clear what steps will be taken related to contamination issues. This information is still pending. Your letter dated December 3, 2001, had stated that you are looking into if Department of Ecology has been notified and the extent of clean up required by them. At the meeting it was decided that the environmental consultant shall respond to this item. Planned Action determination cannot be completed until a response is received from your environmental consultant. B. Comments related to Construction Permit: 1. A Fair Share Agreement is required between the Owner of this development and the City of Tukwila, for a future 12" waterline and appurtenances, within South 112th Street. The fair share amount shall be based upon the owner's adjacent parcel length, to South 112`h Street and be paid by the owner as specified in the agreement. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • 2. The Director of Public Works is in the process of reviewing your request for doing a proportionate fair share agreement for the half - street improvements and will inform you of his decision in writing. 3. The survey lists a number of easements along with recording numbers and a note that they are unlocateable. You were asked to submit a title report with a copy of all easement documents to help explain why they are unlocateable. Based on review your resubmittal, the document refers to each individual recorded document for the exact location. Please include copies of all documents referenced in the title report. 4. There is a 40 feet wide ingress /egress easement along the north property line and parking is proposed within the easement area. You were asked to provide documentation that parking is allowed per easement documents. You have indicated that the easement was revoked in 1972. The copy of the document recorded in 1972 that was submitted by you is not a very legible copy as it has been faxed twice. Please provide a copy that is readable. Also provide copies of both documents referenced in relation to the 40 feet easement- 6475006 and 7202290168. 5. A site lighting plan is required. Pursuant to 18.50.100, the following site lighting standards shall apply to this site: a) The minimum light levels in parking areas, paths between the buildings and street or parking areas shall be 1 foot - candle; b) The maximum ratio of average:minimum light levels shall be 4:1 for illuminated grounds; c) Maximum illumination at the property line shall be 2 foot - candles; d) Lights shall be shielded to eliminate direct off -site illumination; and e) General grounds need not be lighted. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 206 -431 -3685. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner 1 7"MieWDhaliwal - Re: Heiser From: .Cyndy Knighton To: Minnie Dhaliwal Date: = 1/2/02 5:35PM Subject: Re: Heiser I don't believe Heiser needs a TIA because they fall under the requirements of the planned action. That alone should remove them from needing a study as long as they meet the intent of the planned action, correct? The studies done in the EIS process has already shown that the area is under capacity and can handle redevelopment to at least the level studied. The intersection of 112th /Pac Hwy has been signalized since the planned action was done. Because of that, the requirment of watching for the 30 second delay increase has been removed. The mitigation that was identified in the planned action was to signalize the intersection as it was unsignalized at the time of the EIS. This has not removed the need of the applicant to provide all frontage improvements, including undergrounding, in accordance with the roadway widening plan. That much was clear in the planned action implementiation plan. Does that help? Have I misunderstood anything? It wasn't easy reading the planned action implementation plan, the DEIS, the FEIS, and everything else and figuring out what really needed to be done. Cyndy »> Minnie Dhaliwal 1/2/02 5:09:19 PM »> Thanks Cyndy. I will pass this on to the applicant. Also, I believe you had reviewed another project - Heiser building addition proposed at the SW corner of 112th/Tukwila International blvd and determined that a traffic analysis /trip generation study is not required for that project. I am in the process of writing up a staff report for the Planned Action SEPA and I need to include some information about why a traffic study was not required. Following is the info that I could find in the 1997 reports that were done at the EIS stage: SEPA review would be required for projects that will increase delays by more than 30 secs at the intersection of 112/TIB. Did we determine that this project would not trigger that threshold without a TIA? 112/TIB intersection was operating at LOS F in both 2:30 and 5:00 pm peaks. Then there was some language that suggested that the intersection could be improved to LOS D by providing a protective /permissive signal phase for east west traffic - installation of signal head and wiring. Please give me some basis for your decision so I can include those in the staff report. Thanks again. Minnie »> Cyndy Knighton 01/02/02 02:42PM »> Dave had asked me to look at the letter submitted by Christopher Brown & Associates which was included as the traffic analysis for the Five Rivers preliminary plat. This letter confirms that this development will, indeed, generate more than 5 peak hour trips and is therefore required to comply with our concurrency requirments in addition to meeting SEPA requirements. This means that the applicant will need to submit a traffic impact analysis that looks at the level of service Aup / Minnie+Dhaliwal - Re: Heiser •�� of all intersections which will be impacted by the new trips generated by the plat development. Analysis will need to be done for year of opening as well as opening plus six years. The study will have to demonstrate compliance with our concurrency code (TMC 9.48). In addition, the proposal is showing an offset intersection from the existing S 159th Street. The report needs to provide a safety and accident analysis to justify the offset of such a small distance. An accident analysis in this location needs to also include a sight distance analysis given the terrain. The development will need to comply with sight distance requirement outlined in the AASHTO Green Book. If you have any questions, please let me know, but this is what I will need to have to review before the project can be given a final decision on approval /denial. Thanks! Cyndy Cyndy Knighton Senior Transportation Engineer .City, of Tukwila 206.433.0179 206.431.3665 fax CC: David McPherson Page 2 MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Associate Engineer DATE: December 20, 2001 SUBJECT: Heiser Building Addition 11210 Tukwila International Boulevard Planned Action and Informational Comments Building Permit — 001 -329 Informational Comments 1. The Traffic /Transportation Division has determined that a traffic analysis /trip generation study is not required for this project. 2. A Fair Share Agreement is required between the Owner of this development and the City of Tukwila, for a future 12" waterline and appurtenances, within South 112th Street. The fair share amount shall be based upon the owner's adjacent parcel length, to South 112`h Street and be paid by the owner as specified in the agreement. 3. Half - street improvements are required adjacent to the site, along Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 112`h Street. Improvements include, but are not limited to asphalt roadway; curb, gutter, and sidewalk; storm drainage, street lighting, channelization, and undergrounding of power. The owner may provide detailed information and justification for a portion of the frontal improvements and /or the undergrounding of power, to be delayed by agreement. The Director of Public Works may grant a delay of part or all of these improvements, or deny the request based upon the merits of the request and at his discretion. i Minnie Dhaliwal - E01 -026 Heiser Buildi•ddition From: "Jeffrey S. Araucto" <jeffa @scm- arch.com> To: <mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/11/01 10:49AM Subject: E01 -026 Heiser Building Addition Ms. Dhaliwal, I have responded to your comments on December 3, 2001. There are still items in that letter which require your confirmation. That is if the City will require us the following: 1. Half- street improvements 2. A Traffic Study would like to know what the City's requirements. Best regards, JeffAraucto Stricker Cato Murphy Architects CC: <bholt @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Page 1 • STRICKER CATO MURPHY • ARCHITECTS, P.S. • 120 Lakeside Avenue Suite 310 S e a t t l e , W a s h i n g t o n 98 1 22 Tel 206/324 -4800 Fax 206/322 -2875 Website: www.scm - arch.com December 3, 2001 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Response to Comments dated.November 6, 2001,for file number E01 -026 RECEIVED DEC 6 q 2001 DEVELO� Dear Miss Dhaliwal: This is an item -by -item response to your comments related to Planned Action SEPA and Construction Permit. I am responding to the best of my knowledge. A. Response to comments related to Planned Action SEPA 1. Steps are being taken to clarify if the Department of Ecology has been notified and the extent of the clean up required by them. A response to this item will be issued upon completion of data. 2. The existing tenants approximately generate 36 trips during am peak hours and 36 trips during pm peak hours. Heiser Body Co, Inc. will take over the whole facility and will generate approximately 45 trips during am peak hours and 45 trips during pm peak hours (please correct the previous 47 trips I specified in the environmental checklist). There will be an increase of 9 trips for each peak periods. This was based on the number of employees. The non -peak volume trips will be generated by guests and customers. For the existing tenants the approximate number of non -peak volume trips per day is 32. For Heiser Body Co., Inc. the approximate number of non -peak volume trips per day is 15 (please correct the previous 25 trips specified in the environmental checklist). This increase of peak volume trips seems to be very few to warrant a Traffic analysis/Trip generation study. Please clarify this requirement. 3. The list of easements is attached. These easements are for existing underground utility systems. This is mainly the reason for the difficulty in locating them. 4. JARPA/HPA permit will not be required by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. 5. Responses to comments relating to items in the environmental checklist: Item B 8 (I): Triad Machineries and General Trailer are the existing tenants of the site. Heiser Body Co., Inc. will take over the whole facility. There will be no change in the uses of the buildings when Heiser Body Co., Inc. takes over. The existing facility is presently being used for preparation and painting of equipment, trucks, vans and trailers. 1 • The existing open areas in the site are being used for storage and parking of trucks and equipment. Heiser Body Co., Inc. will use the open areas for maneuvering and parking trucks, vans and trailers prior to preparation, painting and delivery. Please see attached statement from Heiser Body Co., Inc. dated November 16, 2001. Item 8 8 (d) The existing underground vault mentioned is an oil /water separator. The existing oil /water separator will not be utilized for the operations of the future tenants. It will be removed to allow installation of new utilities that are located at the same location or within its proximity. Item 8 1 (e): An approximate of 440 cubic yards of import from another suitable material site may be required. An approximate 150 cubic yards of cut near the southeast corner shall be used to compensate for shortfalls on -site. With respect to the mentioned soil contamination the retained consultant will identify the horizontal and vertical limits of the soil that will be transported from the site. After certifying the site as clean the amount of suitable compensation will be determined. All existing pavement on site will be removed, regarded and repaved. B. Response to comments related to Construction Permit 1. The City of Tukwila has not yet delineated the half- street improvement requirements for the CIP Program with respect to the subject public way. Our response is contingent to the determination of Public Works. We will respond to this item after Public Works has specified its requirements. 2. The 40 -foot wide ingress /egress easement along the north property line was revoked on November 15, 1971. The easement does not exist. 3. Existing signs are not located close to the proposed building addition. Existing tenants will continue to utilize the facilities during construction. Their signs will remain and will be removed after their evacuation. New signs for Heiser Body Co., Inc. will conform to the standards of Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code and will be installed in the appropriate time under a separate permit as necessary. Please call for questions, clarification or comments concerning our response and the items being addressed in this letter. Best regards, J re . Araucto Project Administrator Cc: file, J. Olson, W. Faux, A. Semer 2 Minnie Dhaliwal - E01- 026/D01 -329 Hei uilding Addition Page 1 From: "Jeffrey S. Araucto" <jeffa @scm - arch.com> To: <dmcpherson @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/3/01 11:33AM Subject: E01- 026/D01 -329 Heiser Building Addition Dear Mr. Dave Mcpherson, I writing with much concern about the delay on the review of our Building and Land Use permit applications. I have asked Ms. Holt to update us on the whole process so that we may receive the comments from the Building Division, Public Works and Fire Department. Ms. Holt could not officially issue the comments pending your review. It appears that the Planning and Public Works Divisions are still reviewing the process. I am not really sure what it meant but I think it would be safe to assume that the matter delaying this procedure is your determination on the half- street improvement requirements. In the Pre - application meeting and in the many conversations prior to our permit application between our Civil Engineer and your Department this matter was never even discussed. Now that this matter has surfaced as a requirement I am surprised to learn that the developmental details are not yet delineated. I would like to know your progress in this review. I would like to know the reason for the delay, also. I wish to get clarifications on the matter because further delay will be impacting the project and my Client's program. The review process is almost 8 weeks from the time of my application. Please respond today with your update. Best regards, Jeffrey S. Araucto Project Adminstrator Stricker Cato Murphy Architects (206) 324 -4800 CC: "Robin Murphy" <robinm @scm- arch.com >, "John Olson" < jolson @seattleconstruction.com >, "Allen Semer" <mekobtn @att.net >, <bholt @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Minr,ie Dhaliwal - Additional Response: .026 : Heiser Building Addition From: To: Date: Subject: Ms. Dhaliwal, "Jeffrey S. Araucto" <jeffa @scm - arch.com> <mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us> 11/20/01 11:49AM Additional Response: E01 -026 : Heiser Building Addition In addition to my initial response dated, November 19,2001, I would like also to include a response to item B.1. We have coordinated the matter with your Public Works Department concerning the half- street improvement you are requiring. It appears that the City of Tukwila has yet to delineate the requirements for the Tukwila International Boulevard Phase 3 CIP Program. At this point we are unable to respond to this item because we are awaiting the City's requirements. We will respond as soon as the Public Works Department is certain. Best regards, Jeffrey S. Araucto Original Message From: Jeffrey S. Araucto [mailto:jeffa @scm - arch.com] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:50 AM To: mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us Cc: John Olson Subject: E01 -026 : Heiser Building Addition Importance: High Dear Ms. Dhaliwal, This is an initial response to you letter dated November 6, 2001. 1. On the Trip generation study: The Existing tenants (Triad Machineries and General Trailer) of the property has 36 employees and 12 -20 visitors. The new owner /business will have 47 employees. The existing tenants will vacate and Heiser will entirely use the site. Do we really need to make a traffic analysis? The change in number seems to have very little impact on the existing traffic flow, therefore, it will not require any traffic analysis. 2. We have coordinated with the Department of Fish and Wildlife. They have analyzed our proposal and will not require a JARPA/HPA permit. Please strike this out from our EPA checklist response. 3. on item 5/B 8(1): As I have mentioned in item 1 of this letter. The existing tenants will vacate the facility and Heiser truck bodies will take over the entire facility. The use will not be changed. All truck body manufacturing /repair activities will be confined within the structure. Please clarify your concern in this item. Please respond. Best regards, Mini !e Dhaliwal - Additional Response: 426 : Heiser Building Addition Jeffrey S. Araucto Project Administrator Stricker Cato Murphy Architects (206) 324 -4800 CC: "Allen Semer" <mekobtn @att.net >, "John Olson" < jolson @seattleconstruction.com> Page Geo eoEngineers March 29, 2001 George Heiser Corporation 725 South Hanford Street Seattle, Washington 98134 Attention: Mr. George Heiser We are pleased to submit our report titled "Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, General Trailers Company/Triad Machinery Site, Tukwila, Washington." We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please contact us if you have questions, or require clarification regarding the information presented in this report. TRM:TEP:tw Document ID: 898400100R.Doc Attachments GeoEngineers, Inc. 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Telephone (253) 383 -4940 Fax (253) 383 -4923 www.geoengineers.com Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. I ?� Terry E. Parks Principal TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS • 2 SOIL CONDITIONS /. 3 Field Screening Results and Sample Selection 4 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS 4 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS 4 GENERAL 4 SOIL 4 GROUND WATER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 LIMITATIONS 7 TABLES Table No. Summary of Chemical Analytical Results, Petroleum Hydrocarbons — Soil 1 APPENDIX A FIGURES Figure No. Soil Classification System A -1 Key to Boring Log Symbols A -2 Boring Logs A- 3...A -11 Appendix B — Chemical Analytical Program B -1 Appendix C — Laboratory Data Report C -1 G e o E n g i n e e r s i File No. 8984 - 001 -00- 3150/032901 • • REPORT PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT GENERAL TRAILERS COMPANY/TRIAD MACHINERY SITE 11210 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) at the General Trailers Company/Triad Machinery site located at 11210 Pacific Highway South in Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). We understand that George Heiser Corporation is interested in purchasing the property. Previous environmental investigations at the site by others identified the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil beneath the site. Our scope of environmental services for this project was developed in conjunction with conversations with Craig Hogan of Kidder Mathews & Segner, Inc., a brief site visit, and a review of the following documents prepared for the site by Maul Foster and Alongi. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS GeoEngineers reviewed the following documents prepared for the site by Maul Foster and Alongi, Inc. • Draft, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, 11210 Pacific Highway South, Tukwila, Washington, prepared for General Trailers Company, dated May 22, 1997. The Draft Phase I ESA appeared to be completed in general accordance with current standards. We did not review the final Phase I ESA. The recommendations provided in the draft Phase I report included: • Collecting eight shallow soil samples from areas at the site associated with potential releases of hazardous substances, • Collecting two ground water samples, and • Submitting the samples for analyses of petroleum- related hydrocarbons, metals and volatile organic compounds. • Level 2 Environmental Site Assessment at 11210 Pacific Highway South, Seattle, Washington, prepared for General Trailer Company, dated July 22, 1997. The Level 2 ESA reported that seven shallow soil samples were collected from depths ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 feet below ground surface (bgs). Diesel -range hydrocarbons were either not detected or were detected at concentrations less than applicable cleanup levels in six of the seven soil samples. Diesel -range hydrocarbons were detected at a concentration greater than the cleanup level in one sample. Ground water samples were not collected. G e oE n g i n e e r s 1 File No. 8984- OOI -00- 3150/032901 • SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our site assessment was to evaluate the presence or likely presence of petroleum products on the property. Our specific scope of services provided for the Phase II ESA is as follows: 1. Coordinating the location of subsurface utilities at the site. 2. Preparing a health and safety plan for our representatives in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 -24. 3. Collecting representative soil and ground water samples from borings drilled to approximate depths of 15 feet, or refusal (whichever is encountered first) at as many as eight locations at the site. Our boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Samples were collected using direct - push (StrataProbe) drilling equipment operated by Transglobal Environmental Geosciences (TEG). Ground water samples were collected from borings SP -1 through SP -7 for chemical analysis. 4. Submitting soil and ground water samples for one or more of the following analyses: hydrocarbon identification by Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Method NWTPH -HCID, arsenic, cadmium, chromium lead and mercury (metals) by EPA 6000 and 7000 series, semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA method 8260. A minimum of one soil sample from each boring was submitted to TEG laboratory for chemical analysis. 5. Evaluating the data with respect to current Ecology MTCA cleanup levels. 6. Preparing a report summarizing our Phase II ESA findings. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The site is situated on the southeast corner of the intersection between Pacific Highway South and 112th Street in Tukwila, Washington, as shown on Figure 1. The site is located in the northeast '/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The surface of the site is approximately 20 feet above mean sea level (MSL), based on the United States Geologic Survey 7.5 minute Seattle South, Washington, quadrangle topographic map (1973). The general topography in the vicinity of the site slopes in a west - southwest direction towards the Green River. The Green River is situated less than 1/4 mile to the west and south. The general layout of the site is shown on Figure 2. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS Eight borings (SP -1 through SP -8) were completed at the site at the locations shown on Figure 2. The borings were completed using 2 -inch diameter rods advanced by a StrataProbe using a direct -push drilling method. Seven of the eight borings (SP -1 through SP -7) were temporarily converted into ground water monitoring wells using 1 -inch diameter PVC casing and screen. G e o E n g i n e e r s 2 File No. 8984- 001 -00- 3150/032901 • • All eight borings were completed to an approximate depth of 15 feet bgs. Locations of the borings are as follows: • Boring SP -1 was located near a transformer on the north side of the building. • Borings SP -2 and SP -3 were placed within the proposed building addition area. • Borings SP-4 and replacement boring SP-4A were located south of the existing waste oil above ground storage tank (AST). Boring SP-4 was terminated at 6 feet bgs due to an obstruction. This obstruction may be an existing utility corridor or utility vault of unknown origin. SP-4A was located approximately 10 feet south of boring SP-4. • Boring SP -5 was placed west of the oil/water separator. • Borings SP-6 and SP -7 were located adjacent to the existing paint booth. • Boring SP -8 was placed on the south- central portion of the property within the existing equipment yard. Soil samples were collected at 4 -foot intervals using a 4 -foot long split -spoon sampler. The borings were monitored by a geologist from GeoEngineers who visually classified the soil samples obtained during drilling, and performed field screening tests for evidence of the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. Soil samples were classified in accordance with the system described in Appendix A. Field screening consisted of water sheen testing, headspace vapor screening, and observation for staining and/or odor. Field screening methods are described in more detail in Appendix A. The results of field screening are also presented on the boring logs in Appendix A. The soil samples were selected for chemical analysis based on field screening results. After the borings were completed, they were checked for the presence of ground water. A temporary 1 -inch PVC monitoring well was installed in borings SP -1 through SP -7. Ground water was measured in each boring at depths between 10 and 12 feet bgs, with the exception of boring SP-4A where ground water was measured at a depth of about 5 feet bgs. The shallow ground water measured in well SP -4A is potentially a result of a utility corridor or vault that is storing water that is infiltrating down from the surface and not indicative of a perched ground water unit. A ground water sample was collected from each temporary monitoring well following purging of three well volumes of water. Ground water sampling methods are described in Appendix A. Thirteen soil samples and seven ground water samples were submitted to the laboratory for chemical analysis. Each boring was then abandoned in accordance with Ecology regulations. SOIL CONDITIONS Soil encountered in the eight borings generally consisted of brown silty fine to medium sand with gravel between 1 and 10 feet bgs underlain by brown fine to coarse sand with silt to a depth of 15 feet bgs. G e o E n g i n e e r s 3 File No. 8984 - 001-00 - 3150/032901 Field Screening Results and Sample Selection Soil samples from the borings were field screened for evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons using visual, water sheen and headspace vapor screening methods. Soil samples were selected for chemical analysis based on field screening results and/or the depth relative to the water table, particularly if field screening did not indicate the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil boring. A petroleum -like sheen was observed in one or more soil samples collected from each boring. Relatively low concentrations of combustible vapors (3.2 parts per million [ppm] to 49.3 ppm) were measured in the headspace of soil samples obtained from the soil borings. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Ground water was measured in each boring at depths between 10 and 12 feet bgs, with the exception of boring SP-4A where ground water was measured at a depth of about 5 feet bgs. Ground water flow direction at the site appears to be toward the southwest. CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS GENERAL Thirteen soil samples and seven ground water samples were submitted to TEG of Lacey, Washington, for chemical analysis. The samples were analyzed for one or more of the following analyses: NWTPH -HCID, NWTPH -Dx, metals, VOCs, and SVOCs. The chemical analytical data are summarized in Tables 1 through 4. A copy of the laboratory report is presented in Appendix B. The chemical analytical data are discussed below, relative to MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels (adopted on February 12, 2001) for soil and ground water. SOIL Thirteen soil samples were selected for chemical analyses based on field screening results and/or proximity to ground water. Soil samples were submitted for chemical analysis of one or more of the following: petroleum hydrocarbons and metals. Soil samples SP1 -2 and SP7 -2 were also analyzed for VOCs. Sample SP7 -2 was analyzed for SVOCs. The chemical analytical data for soil are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The VOCs and SVOCs data are included in Appendix B and not shown on Tables 1 and 2 as the compounds were either not detected or were detected at concentrations less than the MTCA cleanup level or no MTCA cleanup level exists. Petroleum Hydrocarbons • Gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed samples. • Diesel -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed samples. • Heavy oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) of 100 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in samples SP3 -2 and SP4A -3 using Method NWTPH -HCID. Follow up G e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No. 8984 - 001 -00- 3150/032901 G e o E n g i n e e r s 5 File No. 8984-001 -00- 3150/032901 • • GROUND WATER The seven ground water samples selected for chemical analyses were submitted for analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons and/or metals. The chemical analytical data for soil are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Petroleum Hydrocarbons • Gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed samples. • Diesel -range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed samples. • Heavy -oil range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed samples. Metals • Arsenic was detected at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A ground water cleanup level of 5 micrograms per liter (µg/1) in samples SP3W (8.3 µg/1) and SP5W (110 µg/1). No other samples had concentrations of arsenic above the MTCA Method A cleanup level. • Cadmium was not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in all analyzed ground water samples. • Chromium was detected at concentrations less than the MTCA Method A ground water cleanup level of 50 µg/1 in all analyzed samples. • Lead was detected at concentrations less than greater than the MTCA Method .A cleanup level of 15 µg/1 or not detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) of 0.5 µg/1 in all analyzed samples. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of our Phase 11 ESA indicate that soil and ground water appear to be impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons and/or metals within portions of the site. Motor -oil range petroleum hydrocarbons, lead and cadmium were detected in soil sample SP3 -2 (2 feet bgs) which is situated on the south end of the proposed addition. The motor -oil range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations less than the MTCA Method A ULU cleanup level of 2,000 ppm. Lead and cadmium were detected at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A ULU cleanup level but less than the Method A industrial cleanup level. Lead and cadmium were not detected above the laboratory method detection limit (detection limit) in sample SP3 -7 (7 feet bgs). The metals- impacted soil with concentrations above MTCA Method A ULU cleanup levels appears to be shallow at approximately 2 to 3 feet bgs in the vicinity of the proposed building addition. Health and safety measures will need to be implemented if soil excavation occurs in this area as part of the proposed building addition. Chemical analysis of the soil for metals will need to be performed on the excavated soil prior to disposal. G e o E n g i n e e r s 6 File No. 8984-001 -00- 3150/032901 Arsenic was detected in ground water at concentrations greater than the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 5 µg/1 in samples SP3W (8.3 µg/1) and SP5W (110 µg/1). This indicates that arsenic detected in ground water is most likely from an off -site source rather than from historic operations at the site. Additional research of the subsurface structure encountered while drilling boring SP-4 should be conducted to evaluate the possibility of the structure being a UST. We recommend that the property owners report the presence of metals in soil and ground water at the site to the Washington State Department of Ecology. The MTCA Cleanup Regulation requires, "Any owner or operator who has information that a hazardous substance has been released to the environment at the owner or operator's facility and may be a threat to human health or the environment shall report such information to the department within 90 days of discovery" (WAC 173- 340 -300). LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for use by George Heiser Corporation. This report may be made available to regulatory agencies but is not intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. Use or misuse of this report, or reliance upon the findings hereof by any other parties is at their own risk. Neither George Heiser Corporation nor GeoEngineers makes any representation or warranty to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown. The data reported herein are based on limited subsurface explorations and ground water and soil sampling/chemical analysis. A potential always exists for areas of contamination on the subject property that were not identified during this study. Further evaluation of such potential would require appropriate subsurface exploration and chemical testing. G e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No. 8984-001 -00- 3150!032901 , � The services provided by GeoEngineers satisfy the standard of care, skill, and diligence ordinarily performed by professionals conducting similar services at the time our work was completed. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, should be understood. We trust this report meets your current requirements. Please contact us if you have questions regarding information presented in this report, or if you require additional services. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. Terry R. McPhetridge Senior Environmental Geologist TRM:TEP:tw Document ID: 898400100R.Doc Attachments G e o E n g i n e e r s 8 File No. 8984 - 001 -00- 3150/032901 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - SOIL GENERAL TRAILERS/TRIAD MACHINERY SITE FOR GEORGE HEISER CORPORATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Sample Number Sample Date WTPH -HCID ( mg/kg) WTPH -G (mg/kg) WTPH -Dx ( mg/kg) Gasoline -Range Diesel -Range Motor 011 -Range Gasoline Diesel Motor 011 SP1 -2 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- -- -- SP2-3 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 •- -- -- SP2-10 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- •• -- SP3-2 3/13/2001 <20 <50 >100 -- <20 480 SP4 -3 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -• -- -- SP4A-3 3/13/2001 <20 <50 >100 -- <20 280 SP4A -6 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- -- -- SP5-4 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- -- -- SP6-2 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- •- — SP7 -2 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 -- -- -- SP8-2 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 •- -- -- SP8 -4.5 3/13/2001 <20 <50 <100 — -- •- MTCA Method A Unrestricted Land Use Cleanup Level 30 2000 2000 Notes: Laboratory analysts conducted by TEG NW, Inc. In Bellevue, Washington 'rn0/kg` ='mi111prame per kllograrn = not tested '4011Indicates the analyte was not detected above the concentration shown 898400100T1.xls • • TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS METALS - SOIL GENERAL TRAILERS/TRIAD MACHINERY SITE FOR GEORGE HEISER CORPORATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Sample Number Sample Date MTCA METALS (ma/kg) Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury SP1 -2 3/13/2001 <5 <1 30 156 <0.5 SP2 -3 3/13/2001 <5 <1 <20 11 <0.5 SP3 -2 3/13/2001 <5 4.5 <20 626 <0.5 SP3-7 3/13/2001 -- <1 -- <5 -- SP4-3 3/13/2001 <5 <1 22 42 <0.5 SP4A -6 3/13/2001 <5 <1 26 9 <0.5 SP5 -4 3/13/2001 <5 <1 <20 47 <0.5 SP6 -2 3/13/2001 <5 <1 <20 25 <0.5 SP8 -2 3/13/2001 <5 <1 <20 24 <0.5 ,MTCA Method A Unrestricted Land Use Cleanup Level 20 2 100 250 2 Notes: Laboratory analysis conducted by TEG NW, Inc. In Lacey: Washington. •mg/kg` a milligrams per kilogram not tested Bold value indicates the concentration detected Is greater than the MICA Method A cleanup level for soli d<11.5' = indicates the analyte was not detected above the concentration shown 898400100T2.xls • • TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GROUND WATER GENERAL TRAILERS/TRIAD MACHINERY SITE FOR GEORGE HEISER CORPORATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Sample Number Sample Date WTPH -HCID (mg /I) WTPH -G (mg /I) WTPH -Dx (mg /I) Gasoline -Range Diesel -Range Motor Oil -Range Gasoline Diesel Motor Oil SP1 W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- SP2W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- SP3W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- SP4W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- S P5 W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- SPEW 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- SP7W 3/13/2001 <0.25 <0.63 <0.63 -- -- -- MTCA Method A Ground Water Cleanup Level 1 0.5 0.5 Notes: Laboratory analysis conducted by TEG NW, Bellevue, Washington "mg/I" It milligrams per liter ' -= = not tested "<0.25" =indicates the analyte was not detected above the concentration shown 898400100T3.xls • • TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS METALS - GROUND WATER GENERAL TRAILERS/TRIAD MACHINERY SITE FOR GEORGE HEISER CORPORATION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Sample Number Sample Date MTCA METALS (poll) Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury SPIW 3/13/2001 <1 <0.5 6 <0.5 <0.2 SP2W 3/13/2001 1.2 <0.5 5.4 0.67 <0.2 SP3W 3/13/2001 8.3 <0.5 9.5 <0.5 0.24 SP4W 3/13/2001 2.4 <0.5 11 1.7 <0.2 SP5W 3/13/2001 110 <0.5 41 <0.5 0.62 SP7W 3/13/2001 1 <0.5 7.6 <0.5 <0.2 MICA Method A Ground Water Cleanup Level 5 5 50 15 2 Notes:. Laboratory analysis conducted by Sound Analytical Services, Inc. in Tacoma, Washington "ygR" = micrograms per liter Botd value indicates the concentration detected Is greater than the MTCA Method A cleanup level for ground water '<0.1' m. Indicates the analyte was not detected above the concentration shown 898400100T4.xls • 0 N 0 O re C P:\8984001\00 \CAD \VICINITYAPR (8.5x11PI �e ti I, '`\ �, /,.' " ,` dam le. . ,v,-1 \ hs iI . , m m�ie��11 - ` r W MB i .:. Dttara v.,Im , Ma v 2000 L 2000 Feet Data Sources: Lambert Conformal Conic Washington State Plane South North American Datum 1927 This map is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing site locations. Data was compiled from Sure! Maps. The data source does not guarantee these data are accurate or complete. There may have been updates to the data since the publication of this map. All locations are approximate. 4 Geo kips Engineers VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 8984 - 001 -00 TEP:RJW 03/09/01 P: \8984001 \00 \CAD \GW_SF GTE TECH EQUIPMENT BOEING COMPANY CUSTOMER SERVICES ar CSC ACE ELECTRIC Property Boundary SEATAC FORD 112th STREET S\ GTC Office Trailer Triad Office / Triad Whse. Parts Whse. Shop / Area / Diesel AST GCT Shop Area Waste Oil_ AST SP -4 SP -4A 4-- - Yard -2___. �� "SP -a Outside / SP -2 7 Proposed / Addition / Storager -sp -3 / Shed / / Paint J Booth 1 Wash Rack SP -5 OiI /Water Separator HOLIDAY INN Note: Location of all features shown are approximate. Reference: Drawing entitled, "Site Map ", dated 5/97, by Maul Foster & Alongi, Inc. SP -6 SP -7 OVERNIGHT FREIGHT 100 200 SCALE IN FEET EXPLANATION: SP -1-4- SOIL BORING LOCATIONS AST ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK Roofed Storage Area Geo ,O Engineers SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM GENERAL Subsurface conditions were explored by completing nine soil borings at the site on March 13, 2001 to evaluate the potential presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in subsurface soil and ground water at the site. A geologist from our staff selected the boring locations, observed and classified the soils encountered, and prepared a detailed log of each boring. Soils encountered were classified in general accordance with ASTM D- 2488 -90, which is described in Figure A -1. An explanation of the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A -2. The boring logs are presented in Figures A -3 through A -10. SOIL SAMPLING Soil samples were collected during drilling using a truck- mounted StrataProbe rig owned and operated by TransGlobal Environmental Geosciences Northwest, Inc. (TEG), of Lacey, Washington. Soil samples were collected using a split spoon sampler. The sampler was pushed or driven into the soil using the StrataProbe rig. Upon retrieval, the sampler was opened and a GeoEngineers representative logged the soils in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D- 2488 -90). The portion of the sample corresponding to the lowest sample interval was quickly placed into a clean glass jar, lighted packed, and capped with a plastic lid. An acetate liner was placed in the split spoon sampler during sample collection. All samples were labeled at the time of collection using a unique identifying label and recorded on a Chain of Custody form. The samples were then promptly stored in a cooler with ice. The drill cuttings were placed into a 5- gallon bucket, sealed and removed off -site by TEG. FIELD SCREENING METHODS Our representative conducted field screening on each of the soil samples obtained from the borings. Field screening results can be used as a general guideline to delineate areas of potential petroleum- related contamination in soils. In addition, screening results are often used as a basis for selecting soil samples for chemical analysis. Field screening consisted of headspace vapor testing for combustible gases using a Microtip MP 1000, water sheen testing, and observation for staining and/or odor. Visual screening consists of observing . the soil for stains indicative of petroleum- related contamination. Visual screening is generally more effective when contamination is related to heavy petroleum hydrocarbons such as motor oil, or when hydrocarbon concentrations are high. Sheen screening is a more sensitive screening method that generally can be effective in detecting petroleum -based products in concentrations lower than regulatory cleanup guidelines. G e o E n g i n e e r s A -1 File No. 8984- 001 -00- 3150/032901 410 • Water sheen testing involves placing soil in water and observing the water surface for signs of sheen. The results of water sheen testing on soil samples from the borings are presented on the boring logs. Sheens are classified as follows: Fite No. 8984 -001 -00 -3150 TRM:TEP:tw w SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL - GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY - GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Uquid Umit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Uquid Umit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil In Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch general accordance with ASTM 02488 -90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is In general Moist - Damp, but no visible water accordance with ASTM 02487 -90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soli is obtained from below 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on water table interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. ��p , Geoff Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A -1 00 -3150 TRM:TEP:tw 0 9 0) 0) 0 Z ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY TESTS CA Chemical Analysis FIELD SCREENING TESTS: Headspace vapor concentration data given in parts per million Sheen classification system: NS SS MS HS NT No Visible Sheen Slight Sheen Moderate Sheen Heavy Sheen Not Tested GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY DATA GS Grain size SAMPLE COLLECTION Continuous sample collection at 4.0 -foot intervals using a 1.5- inch - diameter macro - core sampler driven with a pneumatic hammer. Single -use PTFE macro core liners were used for each sampling interval. SOIL GRAPH: SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil Strata Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between Soil Strata Water Level Bottom of Boring • Location of relatively undisturbed sample isg Location of disturbed sample ❑ Location of sampling attempt with no recovery NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration Togs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A -1. Geo i Engineers KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS FIGURE A -2 o 0 0 CC 0 0 0 0 Fc 0 w Project W Triad Machinery Site Job Number II Location 8984-001-00 Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 Logged SLM By Contractor TEG Drill Method Strata Probe Equipment Drill Bit Sample Method Continuous Split Barrel Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: Y-cooirlinate• Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: DEPTH IN FEET I -- ?•• . � ' z 0 E a Blow Count Sample Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description - Headspace Vapor (PPm) Sheen Other Tests And Notes DEPTH IN FEET _ - - _ 10 — - - - 15— - - 20— 25— — 35— 100 100 50 100 1 2 3 4 --2-inch asphalt 30.7 PPm 15.6 PPm 0 ppm 0 ppm SS-MS NS NS NS , - 10 r- —15 - —20 . . —25 —30 - GP SM \Brown fme to coarse gravel (dense, moist) Brown-black silty fine to medium sand with gravel (dense, moist) - Grades to less gravel - - - - - Z — .. . - • SP-SM . . Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (medium dense, wet) - - - Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation - Boring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately 10.5 feet during drilling. Densities based on observation. of symbols ' -- Engineers -\.:---- LOG OF BORING SP-1 FIGURE A-3 1 0 0 a O W 0 0 8 0 O 0 9 0 zz S w 0 w 0 0 Project . Triad Machinery Site Job Number 8984 - 001 -00 Location Tukwila, WA Date 03/13/01 By g� SLM Contractor TEG Method Strata Probe Method Equipment Drill Bit Sample Continuous Split Barrel Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: : Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum' System 8 0 ct o o m a u) Blow Count Sam le Graphic Log USCS {Group Symbol Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPm) Sheen Other Tests And Notes Ul rii 75 75 100 100 1 2 3 4 Note: See — T..a • AC GP-GM SM . SP -SM '- A -2 for explanation -12 -inch asphalt - _ - - - — - - - - - - - — _ 16.5 ppm 4.2 ppm 33 ppm 6.9 ppm SS NS NS NS ^-35 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f N 8 N 0 N 0 a Brown -gray fine to coarse gravel with alt and sand (dense moist) r _ Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel - (medium dense, moist) seam at approximately 2.eet - G l0 feet - '-- ' •' • • .' i; ; _ Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (medium dense, - moist) - Figure Boring completed at a depth of 15 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately - 12.0 feet during drilling. Densities based on observation. — — — of symbols ;` '; , ;; Cep -N.. V�U� ;�EIl ee1'S LOG OF BORING SP -2 w 0 11 0 8 0 0 z 2 Project Triad Machinery Site Job Number 8984-001-00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 Logged By SLM Contractor TEG Drill Method Strata Probe Equipment Dnll Bit Sample Method Continuous Split Barrel Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: Y-coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: Sy_stern: I% Recovery ti z Blow Count Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPm) Sheen Other Tests And Notes N • O pl O Vt C 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 2 4 ......._— • • AC : GP-GM SM — \1.5-inch asphalt - - - -- - - - - 11.7 PPm 8.2 PPm 29.4 PPm 5.8 PPm SS-MS NS SS NS 1 1 1 1 1 I- r -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I i l JY0 O UI 8 N O - ABrown line to coarse gavel with sand and silt (dense, moist) - Brown-black silty fine to coarse sand with gravel (dense, - moist) - Grades to occasional gavel SM-ML Brown silty fine to medium sand/sandy silt — \Bated layers approximately 1-inch thick (dense to stiff r SP - Black fme to coarse sand and a trace of silt (dense, wet) Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation Boring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03113/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately 10.5 feet during drilling. Densities based on observations. - • of symbols Geo -.•`::..- " ' --- Engineers - 1.----- LOG OF BORING SP-3 FIGURE A-5 a 0 0 W 0 0 2 Fr cr0 0 0 z 0 m rJ W 0 Project . J Job Number W L Location Date Drilled 03/13/01 B Bye SLM C Contractor TEG Drill D Equipment B Drill Method Continuous Split Barrel Sampler H Hammer X X-coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 6 E Elevation (ft) Not Measured D Datum System u. m o 0 m o o 0 o 8' n n S Material Description a S. c O Other Tests _ w w Project W Triad Machinery Site Job Number 8984-001-00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 Lo gged SLM By Equipment Contractor TEG Dnll Bit Drill Method Strata Probe Sample Method Continuous Split Berne! Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: y-coonlinate• Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: • . cc zg Sample NTT Blow Count Sample Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol • Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPm) c 0 c0 Other Tests And Notes I •; 8 N o N 1 1 1 1 1 i 1, 1, i, 1 i 1 t 100 81 75 83 1 2 3 4 —st__ C GP-GM Brown fine to coarse gravel with sand and silt (dense, - —..„ moist) "--- - - - - Z - - - 16.3 ppm 32.5 ppm 53 ppm 8.7 ppm SS SS NS NS 1 • ∎ 1 W1 1 1 1 .r - - -(1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 �+, O mi. Blue-gray silt with sand (stiff, moist) SM Brown silty sand and occasional gravel (dense, moist) • SP-SM Brown sand with silt and occasional gravel (dense, wet) Alternating silty layers Note: See Rgure A-2 for explanation ... Boring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered an rods at a depth of approximately 50 to 6.0 feet during drilling. Saturated soil encountered at a depth of approximately - 12.0 feet. Densities based on observations. • of symbols . . \ ,::.;,- Geo ...-?--' . . -- Engineers LOG OF BORING SP-4A FIGURE A-7 0 0 a O U W 0 O L BORING LOO W 0 Project • Triad Machinery Site Job Number W 8984- 001 -00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 B gge4 SLM Contractor TEG Drill Method Strata Probe Equipment Drill Bit Sample ethod Continuous Split Barrel Sampler HammerX Data X-coordinate: X- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum System Z ao o 0 m o m' a c 0 o 3 m 0) $' a o o — o z 8 D Material Description a a. -0 " m 2 c w Other Tests And Notes w LL z w 0 - 0 - - —5 - —10 _ ` —15 - —20 —25 —30. r _ -75 - - 10 — - - 15— - - _ 20— 25— 30— 35-- 100 100 1 2 3 . 5..'1_:,5 • G1�M - -Gray fine to coarse gravel with silt and sand (dense, moist) - - — _ — - - — - — — — — 28.4 ppm 3.2 ppm 6.3 SS NS NS ....as - Brown silty fine to coarse sand wih gravel (dense, moist) - — : ` • ' SP -SM _ Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, moist) SP — Black -gay fine to coarse sand and a trace of silt (dense, - moral to wet) • i ' ' SP-SM _ Brown - orange fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, wet) - Banded layers of silt and sand present - .- _ Baring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately 11.0 feet during drilling. Densities based on observations. — — — Note: See Figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Engineers LOG OF BORING SP -5 FIGURE A -8 Project IIII Triad Machinery Site Job Number qp 8984-001-00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 Logged SLM Ily Equipment Contractor TEG Drill Bit Drill Method Strata Probe Sample Method Continuous Split Barrel Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: Y-coordinate- Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: . System: % Recovery Sample No. Blow Count Sample Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPm) .c co Other Tests And Notes i 8 u, o 1 1,, 1 1 1 1, 1 81 75 100 100 1 2 3 4 01 ' GP-GM Brown-gray fine to coarse gravel with sand and silt - --N (dense, moist) /— - - - - - - — 35.0 PPm 83 PPm 4.6 PP° 4.7 PPm SS NS NS NS 1 , 1 , 1 , , 1 1 i 1 1 , , 1 , 1 , 1 1 1 1 , , 1 , , , , , , , I 8 CJ1 o w o c ) • . • sm Brown silty fine to coarse sand and occasional gravel (dense, moist) 000 GP Brown fine to coarse gravel with sand and a trace of silt --N (dense, moist) ,--- sm — Brown silty fine to coarse sand (dense, moist) • : • . SP-SM • Brown-orange fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, moist) . Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation Boring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately 13.0 feet during cbilling. Densities based on observations. of symbols ‘/1( ,,, Geo -.-:- . --- Engineers LOG OF BORING SP-6 FIGURE A-9 0 w 0 a 0 0 0 0 z 0 m cc 0 Project Triad Machinery Site Job Number 8984 - 001 -00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 Logged SLM Contractor TEG MMethod Strata Probe Equipment Drill Bit Method ontinuous Split Barrel Sampler Daa�er X Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 15 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum System Z b m Q o Sample No. Blow Count Sample Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPm) Sheen Other Tests And Notes o o 01 Ititi_ 75 100 75 83 1 2 3 4 °' c GP-GM Brown fine to coarse gravel with sand and silt (dense., - \ moist) r - - 37.8. - PPm — 11.5 -Ppm - 43 —ppm - 6.5 - PPm — - - — — SS NS NS NS . 1 1 . 1 1 t 1 1 -- 1 - -- 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I 1 I 1 t1 1 1 1 1 1 0 SM �' • SP -SM \Brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel (dense, moist) /-- _ Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, moist) • Note: See SM - Brown silty fine to coarse sand (dense, moist) — - - — '• \:\ • • SP -SM A -2 for explanation Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, wet) - - Figure Boring completed at a depth of 15.0 feet on 03/13/01. - Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately - 11.0 feet during drilling. Densities based on observations. — — — of symbols ' ,1 Geo ff_ --- Engineers LOG OF BORING SP -7 FIGURE A -10 Project IP Triad Machinery Site Job Number 1110 8984-001-00 Location Tukwila, WA Date Drilled 03/13/01 L,ogged SLM By Equipment Contractor TEG Drill Bit Drill Method Strata Probe Sample Method Continuous Split Barrel Sampler Hammer Data X-coordinate: Y-coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 12 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: 0 cr Sample No. Blow Count Sample Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description Headspace Vapor (PPrn) Sheen Other Tests And Notes N WO 01 0 01 0 W 1 , , , 11 , I , i t , , , , I it , I__, , 100 100 100 1 2 3 ° i. GP-GM SM Brown fine to coarse gravel with sand and silt (dense, - —,,,, moist) ,--' 493 PPm 123 PPm 4.7 PPm SS-MS SS NS o 01 o - . • Brown silty fine to coarse sand and occasional gravel (dense, moist) - Green in color - Black in color - - —\Gmdes to wet /— i mi, Graysandy silt (medium stiff, moist) • • SP-SM SM SP-SM Brown fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, moist) Brown silty fine to coarse sand and occasional gravel (dense, moist) — - Brown-orange fine to coarse sand with silt (dense, wet) Note: See Figure A-2 for explanation - Boring completed at a depth of 12.0 feet on 03/13/01. Ground water encountered at a depth of approximately 10.5 feet during drillin — g. Densities based on observations. - of symbols - —15 . - —20 - —25 —30 —35 .,.--=---, ' .■-' -- Engineers LOG OF BORING SP-8 FIGURE A-11 ESN NORTHWEST Environmental Services Network GeoEngineers MAR 2 9 2001 Terry McPhetridge Routing 0 GeoEngineers, Inc. File ___--- - 1101 Fawcett Ave., Suite 200 Tacoma, WA 98402 Dear Mr. McPhetridge: March 26, 2001 Please find enclosed the analytical data report for the HeisterProject in Tukwila, Washington. Soil and water samples were analyzed for Diesel and Oil by NWTPH- Dx/Dx Extended, Hydrocarbon Identification by NWTPH -HCID, VOC's by Method 8260, Semi -VOC's by Method 8270, and MTCA 5 Metals on March 15 — 21, 2001. The results of these analyses are summarized in the attached tables. All soil values are reported on a dry weight basis. Applicable detection limits and QA/QC data are included. An invoice for this analytical work is also enclosed. ESN Northwest appreciates the opportunity to have provided analytical services to GeoEngineers for this project. It was a pleasure working with you, and we are looking forward to the next opportunity to work together. Sincerely, ;*(a4d,eta, Michael A. Korosec President 677 Woodland Square Lp. SE, Suite D • Lacey, Washington 98503 • 360.459.4670 • FAX 360.459.3432 Web Site: www.ESN - USA.com E -Mail: ernnu.@aol rom • ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957 -9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number. S10314 -1 Client: GE! Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number. 8984-001-00 • Analytical Results NWTPH -0x, mg/kg MTH BLK SP2 -10 SP3 -2 SP4A -3 Matrix Soil Sal Soil Soil Sal Date extracted Reporting 03/16/01 03/16/01 03/16/01 03/16/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/16/01 03/16/01 03 /16/01 03/16/01 Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 20 nd nd nd nd Heavy al . 50 nd nd 480 280 Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 102% 111% 103% 104% o-Terphenyl 98% 109% 100% 101% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits na - not analyzed C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 1 of 1 ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957-9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number. S10314 -1 Client: GEI Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number: 8984- 001-00 Analytical Results NWTPH -HCID, mg /kg MTH BLK SP1 -2 SP2-3 SP2 -10 SP3 -2 SP4-3 Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/15/01 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 Gasoline 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Stoddard solvent/Mineral spirits 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Kensol 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Kerosene/Jetfuel 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 50 nd nd nd nd nd nd BunkerC 50 nd nd nd nd nd nd Heavy oil 100 nd nd nd nd D nd Unidentifiable petroleum products 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 95% 101% 102% 111% 103% 102% o-Terphenyl 95% 99% 99% 109% 100% 99% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits D - detected at or above listed reporting limits C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 1 of 3 ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957 -9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number. S10314 -1 Client: GE! Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number. 8984- 001-00 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH -HCID, mg/kg SP4A-3 SP4A -6 SP4A-6 SP5-4 SP6 -2 SP7 -2 Matra Soil - Soil Soil Sal Sal Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Date analyzed Limits 03 /15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Gasoline 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Stoddard solvent/Mineral spirits 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Kensol 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 50 nd nd nd nd nd nd BunkerC 50 nd nd nd nd nd nd Heavy oil 100 D nd nd nd nd nd Unidentifiable petroleum products 20 nd nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 104% 102% 104% 103% 103% 104% o-Terphenyl 101% 101% 102% 103% 105% 104% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits D - detected at or above listed reporting limits C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 2 of 3 ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957-9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number. S10314-1 Client: GEI Client Job Name: , HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number. 8984 -001-00 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH -HCID, mg/kg SP8 -2 SP8 -4.5 SP8 -4.5 Matrix Soil Soil Sal Soil Date extracted Reporting 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Gasoline 20 nd nd nd Stoddard solvent/Mineral spirits 20 nd nd nd Kensol 20 nd nd nd Kerosene/Jet fuel 20 nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 50 nd nd nd Bunker C 50 nd nd nd Heavy oil 100 nd nd nd Unidentifiable petroleum products 20 nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 104% 105% 101% o-Terphenyl 104% 104% 103% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits D - detected at or above listed reporting limits C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 3 of 3 • ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957-9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number S10314-1 Client: GEI Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number: 8984 - 001-00 Analytical Results NWTPH -HCID, mg /I Matra Date extracted Date analyzed MTH BLK SP1W SP2W SP3W SP4W SP5W Water Water Water Water Water Water Water Reporting 03/15/01 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 03 /15/01 03/15/01 Limits 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Gasoline 0.25 nd nd nd nd nd nd Stoddard solvent/Mineral spirits 0.25 nd nd nd nd nd nd Kensol 0.25 nd nd . nd nd nd nd Kerosene/Jet fuel 0.25 nd nd nd nd nd nd Diesel/Fuel oil 0.63 nd nd nd nd nd nd Bunker C 0.63 nd nd nd nd nd nd Heavy oil 0.63 nd nd nd nd nd nd Unidentifiable petroleum products 0.25 nd nd nd nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: FlUorobiphenyl 96% 98% 100% 102% 101% 100% o-Terphenyl 95% 98% 102% 105% 104% 102% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits D - detected at or above listed reporting limits C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 1 of 2 ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957-9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number. S10314 -1 Client: GE! Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number: 8984-001-00 Analytical Results DUPL NWTPH -HCID, mg /I SPEW SP7W SP7W Matra Water Water Water Water Date extracted Reporting 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/15/01 03/15/01 03/15/01 Gasoline 0.25 nd nd nd Stoddard solvent/Mineral spirits 0.25 nd nd nd Kensol 0.25 nd nd nd Kerosene/Jet fuel 0.25 nd nd nd DieselIFuel oil 0.63 nd nd nd Bunker C 0.63 nd nd nd Heavy oil 0.63 nd nd nd Unidentifiable petroleum products 0.25 nd nd nd Surrogate recoveries: Fluorobiphenyl 98% 99% 101% o-Terphenyl 100% 99% 108% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits D - detected at or above listed reporting limits C - coelution with sample peaks M - matrix interference J - estimated value Results reported on dry- weight basis Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 2 of 2 • • ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957 -9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number: S10314 -1 Client: GEI Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number: 8984-001 -00 • Analytical Results DUPE 8260, pg/kg MTH BLK LCS SP1 -2 SP1 -2 SP7 -2 Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Date extracted Reporting 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 Dichlorodifuoromethane 50 nd nd nd nd Chloromethane 50 nd nd nd nd Vinyl chloride 50 nd nd nd nd Bromomethane 50 nd nd nd nd Chloroethane 50 nd nd nd nd Trichlorofluoromethane 50 nd nd nd nd 1, 1-Dichloroethene 50 nd nd nd nd Methylene chloride 50 nd nd nd nd trans- 1,2- Dichoroethene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,1- Dichloroethane . 50 nd nd nd nd cis- 1,2- Dichbroethene 50 nd nd nd nd 2,2 -Dichloropropane 50 nd nd nd nd Chloroform 50 nd nd nd nd Bromochlorornethane 50 nd nd nd nd 1,1,1- Trichlonoethane 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2- Dichloroethane 50 nd nd nd nd 1,1- Dichloropropene 50 nd nd nd nd Carbon tetrachloride 50 nd nd nd nd Benzene 50 nd 75% nd nd nd Trichloroethene 50 nd 75% nd nd nd 1,2- Dichloropropane 50 nd nd nd nd Dtbromomethane 50 nd nd nd nd Bromodichloromethane 50 nd nd nd nd cis- 1,3- Dichloropropene 50 nd nd nd nd Toluene 50 nd 80% nd . nd nd trans- 1,3- Dichloropropene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,1,2- Trcchooroethane 50 nd nd nd nd 1,3- Dichtoropropane 50 nd nd nd nd Dibromochloromethane 50 nd nd nd nd Tetrachloroethene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 50 nd nd nd nd Chlorobenzene 50 nd 88% nd nd nd 1,1,1,2- Tetrachloroethane 50 nd nd nd nd Ethylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd Xylenes 50 nd nd nd nd Styrene 50 nd nd nd nd Bromoform 50 nd nd nd nd 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane 50 nd nd nd nd Isopropylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2,3- Trichloropropane 50 nd nd nd nd Bromobenzene 50 nd nd nd nd n- Propylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 2- Chlorotoluene 50 nd nd nd nd 4- Chlorotoluene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,3,5- Trimethylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd tert- Butylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd seoButylbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,3- Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd nd nd Isopropyltoluene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 50 nd nd nd nd n- Butytbenzene 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2- Dibromo3- Chloropropane 50 nd nd nd nd 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene 50 nd nd nd nd Naphthalene 50 nd nd nd 190 Hexachloro -1,3- butadiene 50 nd nd nd 350 1,2,3- Tcchlorobenzene 50 nd nd nd 110 Page 1 of 2 • • • ESN SEATTLE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY (425) 957 -9872, fax (425) 957 -9904 ESN Job Number: S10314 -1 Client: GEI Client Job Name: HEISTER PROJECT Client Job Number: 8984-001-00 Analytical Results DUPL 8260, pg/kg MTH BLK LCS SP1 -2 SP1 -2 SP7 -2 Matrix . Sal • Soil Sal Soil Sal Sal Date extracted Reporting 03 /14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 Date analyzed Limits 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 03/14/01 Moisture, % 15% 15% Dibnxnofluoranethane 88% 98% 85% 93% 91% Toluene -d8 86% 96% 82% 90% 89% 4- Bronafluorobenzene 94% 104% 91% 99% 100% Data Qualifiers and Analytical Comments nd - not detected at listed reporting limits Acceptable Recovery limits: 65% TO 135% Acceptable RPD limit: 35% Page 2oi2 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NETWORK NORTHWEST, INC. Tukwila, Washington GeoEngineer, Inc. Client Project #8984 - 001 -00 Heavy Metals in Soil by EPA -7000 Series Lead (Pb) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Arsenic (As) Mercury (Hg) Sample Date EPA 7420 EPA 7130 EPA 7190 EPA 7061 EPA 7471 Number Analyzed (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Method Blank 3/19/01 nd nd nd nd nd SP -1 -2 3/19/01 156 nd 30 nd nd SP -2 -3 3/19/01 11 nd nd nd nd SP -3 -2 3/19/01 626 - 4.5 nd nd nd SP-4 -3 3/19/01 42 nd 22 nd nd SP -4A -6 3/19/01 9 nd 26 nd nd SP -5-4 3/19/01 47 nd nd nd nd SP-6 -2 3/19/01 25 nd nd nd nd SP -8 -2 3/19/01 24 nd nd nd nd SP -8 -2 Dup 3/19/01 24 nd nd nd nd Method Detection Limits 5 1 20 5 0.5 "nd" Indicates not detected at listed detection limits. ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Sherry Chilcutt ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NETWORK NORTHWEST, INC. Tukwila, Washington GeoEngineer, Inc. Client Project #8984- 001 -00 QA/QC Data - Total Metals EPA -7000 Series Analyses Sample Number: SP -8 -2 Matrix Spike Matrix SpEce Duplicate RPD Spiked Measured Spike Conc. Conc. Recovery (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ( %) Spiked Measured Spilce Conc. Conc. Recovery (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (A) ( %) Lead Cadmium Chromium Arsenic 125 109 87 50 41 82 125 117 94 50 45 90 125 123 98 50 41 82 125 137 110 50 48 96 12 0.0 16 6.5 Laboratory Control Sample Spiked Measured Spice Conc. Conc. Recovery (mgAg) (mg/kg) ( %) Lead 125 118 94 Cadmium 50 47 93 Chromium 125 133 106 Arsenic 50 44 88 ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR MATRIX SPIKES: 65 %135% ACCEPTABLE RPD IS 20% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Sherry Chilcutt • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NETWORK NORTHWEST, INC. Tukwila, Washington GeoEngineer, Inc. Client Project #8984 - 001 -00 Heavy Metals in Soil by EPA -7000 Series Lead (Pb) Cadmium (Cd) Sample Date EPA 7420 EPA 7130 Number Analyzed (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Method Blank 3/71/01 nd nd SP -3 -7 3/21/01 nd nd Method Detection Limits 5 1 "nd" Indicates not detected at listed detection limits. ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Sherry Chilcutt • • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NETWORK NORTHWEST, INC. Tukwila, Washington GeoEngineer, Inc. Client Project #8984 - 001 -00 QA/QC Data - Total Metals EPA -7000 Series Analyses Sample Nuinber. SP -3 -7 Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD Spiked Measured Spike Conc. Conc. Recovery (mg/IcB) (mg/kg) ( %) Spiked Measured Sprite Conc. Conc. Recovery 0184(8) (mg/kg) ( %) ( %) Lead Cadmium 125 111 89 25 28 112 Laboratory Control Sample Spiked Measured Spike Conc. Conc.. Recovery (mg/kg) (mg/kg) ( %) Lead Cadmium 125 112 90 25 27 108 ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR MATRDC SPIKES: 65 %-135% ACCEPTABLE RPD 1S 20% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Sherry Chilcutt 125 25 125 25 100 100 12 11 • 0 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. $ Client ID: SP1W Lab ID: 96748 -01 Date Received: 3/14/01 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP1W Lab ID: 96748 -01 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg /L) PQL Flags Mercury ND 0.0002 UUU 3 e i • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP2W Lab ID: 96748-02 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg/L) PQL Flags Mercury ND 0.0002 . 5 • • • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP3W Lab ID: 96748 -03 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg /L) PQL Flags Mercury 0.00024 0.0002 vu 7 • • 0, 3 ' • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP4W Lab ID: 96748 -04 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg /L) PQL Flags Mercury ND 0.0002 s.i • 9 • • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP5W Lab ID: 96748-05 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg/L) PQL Flags Mercury 0.00062 0.0002 • • • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP7W Lab ID: 96748 -07 Date Received: 3/14/01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg /L) PQL Flags Mercury ND 0.0002 • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Lab ID: Method Blank - DP489 Date Received: Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/15/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Metals by ICP -MS - USEPA Method 6020 • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Matrix Spike Report Client Sample ID: SP1W Lab ID: 96748 -01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/15/01 QC Batch ID: DP489 Dissolved Metals by ICP -MS - USEPA Method 6020 Sample Spike MS Result Amount Result MS Parameter Name (mg /L) (mg /L) (mg /L) % Rec. Flag Arsenic 0 4 3.81 95 Cadmium 0 0.1 0.0899 90 Chromium 0.006 0.4 0.378 93 Lead 0 1 0.968 97 tJ 15 • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Duplicate Report Client Sample ID: SP1W Lab ID: 96748 -01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/15/01 QC Batch ID: DP489 Dissolved Metals by ICP -MS - USEPA Method 6020 Sample Duplicate Result Result RPD Parameter Name (mg /L) (mg /L) % Flag Arsenic 0 0 NC Cadmium 0 0 NC Chromium 0.006 0.0062 -3.3 Lead 0 0 NC 16 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Lab ID: Method Blank - ZD241 Date Received: Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 Dilution Factor 1 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Result Analyte (mg /L) PQL Flags Mercury ND 0.0002 17 • • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Duplicate Report Client Sample ID: SP1W Lab ID: 96748 -01 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/16/01 QC Batch ID: ZD241 Dissolved Mercury by CVAA - USEPA Method 7470 Parameter Name Mercury Sample Duplicate Result Result RPD (mg /L) (mg /L) % Flag 0 0 NC 19 • Sound Analytical Services, Inc. ANALYTICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS 5755 8th Street East 0 Tacoma, WA 98424 (253) 922 -2310 o FAX (253) 922 -5047 e -mail: info @saslab.com DATA QUALIFIERS AND ABBREVIATIONS B 1: This analyze was detected in the associated method blank. The analyte concentration was determined not to be significantly higher than the associated method blank (less than ten times the concentration reported in the blank). B2: This analyze was detected in the associated method blank. The analyte concentration in the sample was determined to be significantly higher than the method blank (greater than ten times the concentration reported in the blank). C1: Second column confirmation was performed. The relative percent difference value (RPD) between the results on the two columns was evaluated and determined to be < 40%. C2: Second column confirmation was performed. The RPD between the results on the two columns was evaluated and determined to be > 40%. The higher result was reported unless anomalies were noted. M: GC/MS confirmation was performed. The result derived from the original analysis was reported. D: The reported result for this analyte was calculated based on a secondary dilution factor. E: The concentration of this analyte exceeded the instrument calibration range and should be considered an estimated quantity. J: The analyze was analyzed for and positively identified, but the associated numerical value is an estimated quantity. MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level MDL: Method Detection Limit N: See analytical narrative. ND: Not Detected PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit X1: Contaminant does not appear to be "typical" product. Elution pattern suggests it may be X2: Contaminant does not appear to be "typical" product. X3: Identification and quantitation of the analyte or surrogate was complicated by matrix interference. X4: RPD for duplicates was outside advisory QC limits. The sample was re- analyzed with similar results. The sample matrix may be nonhomogeneous. X4a: RPD for duplicates outside advisory QC limits due to analyte concentration near the method practical quantitation limit/detection limit. X5: Matrix spike recovery was not determined due to the required dilution. X6: Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike( /matrix spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits. Sample was re- analyzed with similar results. X7: Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike( /matrix spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits. Matrix interference may be indicated based on acceptable blank spike recovery and/or RPD. X7a: Recovery and/or RPD values for this spiked analyte outside advisory QC limits due to high concentration of the analyte in the original sample. X8: Surrogate recovery was not determined due to the required dilution. X9: Surrogate recovery outside advisory QC limits due to matrix interference. SAS -QAM REV 12 312000 LOL 20 • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Client Name ESN Northwest, Inc. Client ID: SP7 -2 Lab ID: 96784 -01 Date Received: 3/15/01' Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/15/01 % Solids 86.61 Dilution Factor 20 Semivolatile Organics by USEPA Method 8270 Recovery Limits Surrogate % Recovery Flags Low High Nitrobenzene - d5 104 56 145 2 - Fluorobiphenyl 102 55 137 p - Terphenyl - d14 89.2 45 134 Phenol - d5 107 54 140 2 - Fluorophenol 111 57 146 2,4,6 - Tribromophenol 106 35 146 Sample results are on a dry weight basis. Result Analyte (ug /kg) PQL MDL Flags Phenol ND 74 27 bis(2- Chloroethyl)ether ND 74 16 2- Chlorophenol ND 74 17 1,3- Dichlorobenzene ND 74 21 1,4- Dichlorobenzene ND 74 18 Benzyl Alcohol ND 74 22 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND 74 .15 ... 2- Methylphenol ND 74 11 bis(2- Chloroisopropyl)ether ND 74 21 3- & 4- Methylphenol ND 74 20 N- nitroso -di -n- propylamine ND 74 18 Hexachloroethane ND 74 22 Nitrobenzene ND 74 12 Isophorone ND 74 20 2- Nitrophenol ND 74 13 2,4- Dimethylphenol ND 74 19 Benzoic Acid ND 74 8.3 bis(2- Chloroethoxy)methane ND 74 14 2,4- Dichlorophenol ND 74 5.4 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene ND 74 9.9 Naphthalene ND 15 15 4- Chloroaniline ND 74 12 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 74 16 4- Chloro -3- methylphenol ND 74 22 2- Methylnaphthalene ND 15 11 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 74 11 • • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Semivolatile Organics by USEPA Method 8270 data for 96784 -01 continued... Result Analyte (ug /kg) PQL MDL 2,4,6 - Trichlorophenol ND 74 9.9 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol ND 74 10 2- Chloronaphthalene ND 15 6.2 2- Nitroaniline ND 74 24 Dimethylphthalate ND 74 23 Acenaphthylene ND 15 6.1 2,6- Dinitrotoluene ND 74 9.3 3- Nitroaniline ND 74 8.3 Acenaphthene . ND 15 5.3 2,4- Dinitrophenol ND 74 18 4- Nitrophenol ND 74 18 Dibenzofuran ND 30 15 2,4- Dinitrotoluene ND 74 13 Diethylphthalate ND 74 16 4- Chlorophenylphenylether ND 74 12 Fluorene ND 15 6.1, 4- Nitroaniline ND 74 7 4,6- Dinitro -2- methylphenol ND 74 10 N- Nitrosodiphenylamine ND 74 5.5 4- Bromophenylphenylether ND 74 10 Hexachlorobenzene ND 74 19 Pentachlorophenol . ND 74 10 Phenanthrene ND 15 4.9 Anthracene ND 15 7.2 Di- n- butylphthalate ND 150 93 Fluoranthene ND 15 4.8 Pyrene - ND 15 4.2 Butylbenzylphthalate ND 74 11 3,3'- Dichlorobenzidine . ND 74 8 Benzo(a)anthracene ND 15 4.8 Chrysene ND 15 6.2 bis(2- Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 74 22 Di- n- octylphthalate ND 74 18 Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 15 4.2 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 15 5 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 15 6.2 Indeno(1,2,3- cd)pyrene ND 15 5.6 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 15 3.5 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 15 2.2 3 ' SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Semivolatile Organics by USEPA Method 8270 data for SS0207 continued... Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 13 2 SOUND•ANALYTICAL SERVIC`, INC. Blank Spike Report Lab ID: SS0207 Date Prepared: 3/15/01 Date Analyzed: 3/15/01 QC Batch ID: SS0207 Semivolatile Organics by USEPA Method 8270 Blank Spike BS Result Amount Result BS Parameter Name (ug /kg) (ug /kg) (ug /kg). % Rec. Flag Phenol 0 670 529 79 2- Chlorophenol 0 670 547 82 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 0 670 555 83 N- nitroso -di -n- propylamine 0 670 411 62 1,2,4- Tiichoorobenzene 0 670 585 88 4- Chloro -3- methylphenol 0 670 553 83 Acenaphthene 0 670 532 80 4- Nitrophenol - 0 670 579 87 2,4- Dinitrotoluene 0 670 505 76 Pentachlorophenol 0 670 500 75 Pyrene 0 670 477 72 b SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Matrix Spike /Matrix Spike Duplicate Report , X7: Recovery and/or RPD values for matrix spike( /matrix spike duplicate) outside advisory QC limits. Matrix interference may be indicated based on acceptable blank spike recovery and/or RPD. X7a: Recovery and/or RPD values for this spiked analyte outside advisory QC limits due to high concentration of the analyte in the original sample. X8: Surrogate recovery was not determined due to the required dilution. X9: Surrogate recovery outside advisory QC limits due to matrix interference. SAS -QAM REV 12 3t2000 Neg TRANSGLQMAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSC:ENCES ' S" BLS ? - %%WI CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD CLIENT: C • ... ( )...• , is DATE: �•/,.) PAGE / OF PROJECT NAME: G'? �� 1 • .' h ADDRESS: Ii, S G. ,u- R •f iI . 7 ..,- i„ , 11 - ✓Y'• G., H LOCATION: T.. ! M. i! •_ PHONE ' 2:.3 3 t'.1 • .7yp FAX: (:.. ! 3.1 ? '/ i1. 3 COLLECTOR: - .. ■'. 4'....." r COLLECTION •'•' II CLIENT PROJECT: 11 V/ .mow• c% p PROJECT MANAGER: 7 it • If ' ►t4 - Sample Number Depth Time Sampb Type Container Type '��� '°tip �'`° Sr 417. e tiF ti� ��y �` ��y °�c�° a �t)�j .,r e ¢� Qty 4, 6- / °^ e�� "� ♦ FIELD NOTES Total Number of Containers Laboratory Note Number {P-!- =- A- 7 )u 5e,' 1445 ✓ ✓ ✓ 1 P • !"-t1 1. 7 vj t-b..A .f•I -1r 10 7I/ 1.4p`0 .- r% (-1• )A 1l 7<• ,- _ 1,-n%-=' P 1p• .2 } • 3 t' LS ✓ -- ✓ 2 • s P ;: • L j2,) 1Ao .o 1P ; • /c) ' /- Y..10 _ , µop..° sp.: 7./1. / !, Est ■ - µo Lc> ••: '! r, 3 - : ,Z_ `j 3. X. .% ✓ a .P-3-? 7 133 _ ► lice w _, T ter• s• I_I I.; 4:(.S • IADL.[> -. •;I) "4. S 3 J ✓0 ✓ s./ . -' _S,a. e1- S S , /v/ 0 1 1'rfl t.A -', • SP �i9 - a 3 1:��� t 1 ✓ .. .52 • Y R - to le J'? , ✓ ■! SP. L J I J 11 3 v tt•lOLC� 2 SP-�A-13 13 li 3a . 'tam t--4. RELINQUISHED BY (SIgnature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECE PT LABORATORY NOTES; " ? /• .1 ': 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y /NINA REUPIQUISHED BY (Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) '5ATE/tIME SEALS INTACT? YR4MA RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTES: IOTEG DISPOSAL 0 SZAO each 0 Return 0 Pickup • • • 470,5/1/- omANsurRiumENTAL CHAIN.OF-CUSTODY RECORD .•. • .GEosciENcEs ::.c.tieNt 6 6: i .67,......a . . • • DATE 3A3 ' PAGE .2 OF • .‘ /6:1506s. ha/ S. (4.,..ar - PROJECT NAME. e9e/- 60A 00 : •. , , . :0111;c4: s AS2)- 3g3 .Y7f,ii. FAX: LOCATION. 'CL1E4 PROJECT N. PROJECT-MANAGER Mfr".(4 -: .i.i : COLLECTOR '' iv... - OME OF COLL LOTION P.M/ , . Samplb Number . bevte • • Thee • • Semple Tive • Co nblierrhy• • rtil&AISt 4 ,4,'s "4 , "." ' ,/, 451, ",OV . 47,6", r 4/ / 4:17111,14, , .. 4cf-47••4°T- ." 4v‘4`' 4r etbe6gfr kcr fie* NOTES 11.1 Z 1 i I WNW ' 47.2111111 ■./ i .11. 4 . rTVIMIIIIIIIIUI'llrfIIIIIIIIII Mil Jo" 113.51 hot,. .11111111111 I. .11 1111 III s l.,:b IIIIII" 111 gill 111 IBM NM • 111111111ffiffaill• . .t. .. A W-3 III 111 1111 MIMI 1 . IIIMMINIII fi■ii•C> 1111 1111 II "irMM nramimurn iosp44- .1 1 . FATICIIIIIIIIIIIIII 44.11111111111111111111 'pm, ESE • HI . . .. 1 11111 11111111•111111110 El II . • • • 111011 111111111111111 IIII II 1111111011M01111111111,7 : •BA04-j_3-.• • 11 ,641.11111111. '. I I II 1111111111 . )41:, ....C> 111 • Stk it.•-.1 , MEE jr#11111 . eirainim mrsgenumwzmirimumo 1111MINffill 18 ' 42 • , . ...rirmenrsal 'p P.'. —: rEirmit .., . II ' : IN • 1 III • . •10 , m IL .• . • . . INIS •I 1 , 4. - • , MN • ••EIN infis •. ).1.0 11111111111111111111 II RIM . • • • 'MINNA • .! . ReuNcesHED flY Arabi* DATE-41W ECED.8Y (Signotire) t'1ErtkE . 13/4101.E4tECE1PT Uk0ORATORY NOTES: p_erl„.A • s •. • "^Av rb Oa Z 1.41 ••,. .t e.".1.,c il (,"/;,1 • .1.-td)if -a.'" , ... ":2 ,41 urn Around Time: X141 Atsu it/ '1;i 4J: v. /..../--11/4 Tarru..Nutiativtio. cotaNNERs CHAIN OFOUSTODY SEALS 'WM tamp 8Y (signal" • DATEiTua RE NED EysEsonstaii.e) . DATE/TNE • - . • ' • SEALS INYACT7 YoWNA , RECEIVED G000 CONDkOLD swIlEorsayssuipaTituciltirri. - • I • NOTES: ' _... :TED DOOSAE 4.12.00eilth D Return CI ' •• • t t NVOONMENTAL • GEascs CHAIN- OF - CUSTODY• RECORD' ..CLJENIL. i' e2 DATE• Flo/ • • PAGE 3 OF 3 -A DIiRESS: /to/ J. A. 4^# r4..0 ; 7'a •.,,....._ • • • PROJECT NAME: 7(17Y-`-'41'4.4"4' P4H(*E• (x.31.7 0 .a a G z . FAX: • LOCATION. 1'4•4 wi/ %i • _ CLIENT' PROJECT #: • I . _ PROJECT MANAGER:7'07 44`,144k : COLLECTO4 Sio OM O f 3/11.f . Sample Number � • Time Sample Type centalnet TYM s" ii $ , r 4' < ` . . ', `.° t' ; ' e cm ,�'' • vy NOTES 1 I i8 •-1 tf 2 I 9 z ,,J. • cp•s4-. •.34,4 !o' Iry °yr< J 1 (a 2: SP•'L.,,t -1L 4I3.3 1 • 3: . se- ).....)/m. PPS, t li J L/ .. 4.. .. S :_' . $: 10• - • ' .11. • 12.. .. • _ 13. . : . . 1 i4. 16. 17z 18. M i�A �_ �i '1 1 t I RELI • ED B Signature) DATEITIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) OA . E • SASE RECEIPT _I LABORATORY NOTES: r / t • Turn P undTine: ' 7 3/ � TOTAL. NUiviBER 01` CONTAINERS REUNOUIS}iED BY (Slpnahae) "' DATEFTSAE ' RECE ' BY• (SIgnf , ) • • E •• _ CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y114/NA SEALS INiACTT'Y/NMA . REG'£NED 000P tONDICOLD SAMPL DISPOSAL iuS ROCTk» S . �. NOTES: .s. OTEGbisf!opit'Q•$? :oo -sects 6 •R- "D 'PicRyp . • c�t 1AI r -Or -Cub-- Our Fl Or-t 1�:1 RANSGEut Al __, `_�.: ENVIRONMENTAL • eg ' GEOSCIENCES CLIENT: Gee• C •4.),0a.od DATE: 3//3 PAGE / OF PROJECT NAME: '1 gV' oo / - c o ADDRESS: Il v1 S. Fu w.4dI 13 ire ? co0-4I . ,,v 14 1 t is L. LOCATION: T L.; //., PHONE ( 253) • 3 S3 • 91Vo FAX: (;..C-3) 382-9/22 COLLECTOR: Seo7' Ai..�J . COTEOF -? � � COLLECTION / CLIENT PROJECT #: g9g`/- ool-oa PROJECT MANAGER: eta N'P /eti�cL Sample Number Depth Time Sample Type Container Type v°' O O �? m� s 8 44, �9 PvyO,�O,• �� \��p Ory� �.� ^y` 4. �,e ^O4,- Gig `4p 4) v�0 °c' P m q? m Ja a RP e 42 o p�' ., 4. 4 °P a °P -r 0? k k k k Qt 4- .z1' a .,,0 i? FIELD NOTES _..Total Number of Containers oratory to Number (P -1- 2 2- 73v- Sell yo SP•i -L L 7v4 S e-J-lo to 7 V .- Q*-)- 13 13 75.. SP• a 3 3 7 /S 2 SP p-` 1. S2o a S67-.?-10 /a 830 D- S°'- -C3 )3 8 -3S 2 58.3-3 -2 .2 53e V- P -3- 47 7 4P 2 Sa -3 '/o 10 Ito I SP- 3 -/N lq yc/S , z _SP --�►- 3 .3 /oas l Z • Se- 41- S S /0/0 Se- 04 —3 3 )42•. .2 •SP- q - ID 1.2.e -2 Se- y'A- 11 11 1.230 - SP-yA-I3 13 1.2341. ' 2 RELINQUISHED BY Si nature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) DATE/TIME SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: w 3 / •sue q �.��ol� /b irprvy TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA -)RELINQU ED BY Si nature DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY Sf nature AIri (Signature) ) (Signature) ) SEALS INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD COND. /COLD SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTES: OTEG DISPOSAL O $ZOO each 0 Retum 0 Pickup TRANSGLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES f ! '1— CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD CLIENT 6E0 E"J, ---efs DATE: 3//-3 PAGE I2 OF PROJECT NAME. g96-9- 6,01- 00 ADDRESS: j'v/ S. C. -.r•.l( LOCATION: Tµ !,,., %//,t PHONE: ( X37 3e-3 "/1 v/o FAX: CLIENT PROJECT #: PROJECT MANAGER. T�'' r'`/''4'(" COLLECTOR: -5%0 ri ^'^-rl —1%9- COLLECTION Sample Number Depth Time Sample Type Container Type \ , p9 _.. ��g ry�0 �S X10 ��, bo\ �J' . e .�0 4O y` he y`e ti PpQP, 'Pti�� °�%),' IS q ,iv,' 4O 4o 4O 4. 4 4+ 4 ,R 4: Q ,so NOTES Total Number of Containers Laboratory Naimber 1 . S P'S - y (4 /V 10 . of fiar 11•1 2 2. SP* S''o /0 103. : 3.354-S- /3 13 14510 2 4.5P- it- A .2 /SoS ( . 5 . . P - & - i• , 3/0 -2. 6. SP- 6,-/I II 1 )x 2 7.9'4- iti 14/ ,. 133 .2 8. SP'?•2 Z 055 -Z 9. So • } — S S /yam 10,5P -7-4- 9 9 'l Lilo -Z 11.5P-7-1-3 /3 /59s , a2 . 12. 5/12-8..-2 P• ' ISoS = 4 13:SP-e -40 it, !s% :, 14.$ -g- /0 14., /Sv`° 2 15. $1-1W- 31-101 I? 05 4 16. Se.. w- 3 Lie/ g*10 e, 17. 5P3w-3 /JO 1 S 18. S 9- 1140 4130/ t Y3 G RELIN ISHED Y (Signature) DATE/TIME EC D BY (Signature) / DA IME SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: / M {JAL"' S t , w --Ar r, 1,8: 4 /NKt✓ 1-"t2/1/ . ,r ti ; ` fin Turn Around Time: �n r;, Kd l P V2 C" AWL, �� 13, � � TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS � V/34/ 1✓ U `�� CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA RELINQUISHED BY (Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) DATEFTIME SEALS INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD COND. /COLD SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTES: 0 TEG DISPOSAL ® $2.00 each 0 Retum 0 Pickup • CHAIN---0E-CUSTODY RECORD . CLIENT: 6 Ct . DATE: YA//.../ PAGE 3 OF PROJECT NAME. ADDRESS: ho / .L 4 . (-eV , 7-A : a 0...0... PHONE: (Psi?) 7 614., FAX. LOCATION. CLIENT PROJECT #: PROJECT MANAGER: 7'/9 Ilf ' ,iCi"e k DCAOTELLEOCTION 2/111/ill COLLECTOR ...‹, ,, 77/ H.. ..g.,t..Q Sample Number Depth Time Sample Type Container Type i'' 6,6 et> 9P d• 0 42 ..(3 d) 4,41/ )1' \-1 , + (tP tIQ 41 t,'• ,i 4 tPl. 0t %I' 0 1/4" 6. . r btP° 4 3 Ir 44411:41. 40' 40'40T-co .<1(...4z, 4+ 4,z. os• Qatrob .c614' NOTES [Total Number f Containers 1. 0 ; E z : .; 1. < P. -s-g- -3J-14 )4;6d 1-0.44* $./... ( 2. -' Pw-344) , 3. Se- 7 &..)-3 /34 i105 1 4. 5. 6. • 7. 8. 9, .., 10. ._, 11. _ 12. 13. 14. 15, 16. 17. .. 18, RELIN DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature Signature) DA I E SAMPLE RECEIPT LABORATORY NOTES: tiele.-1 c../:l' /.'/,‘,1•,; -0.Y.T y Tum Around Time: 7ED - '/$4/, )S 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA RELINQUISHED BY (Signature) DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY (Signature) DA ME ' SEALS INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS NOTES: 0 TEG DISPOSAL el $2.00 each 0 Retum 0 Pickup ; • K- / / / a 20' SEIB gz. raw ra mxr. V 44 j ji it /g) • .• ExtSINIG • SIGNAL PDX DUSTING UTILITY PDX ENIETING SKIN IIVS/ EmsnNG PANNING RESTR1PCD rOR ONAPACT PARKING S 112TH STREET (EXISTING EASEMENT) ZITS INC. -OT EXISTPFG FIRE NM:AMY N. N. N. N.„ N. .... 1 Extsroa; NEN IRAsizi oNAPALwic N. e., EtiCACSuRC FENCE N.Ies. \At, ..... N. i / CarrItie ARE ORP: COINECTR:14 COSTING sc., Post bLsroe. unuTy PDX N.* Exisio4c LAbmscAorD am. Boa «AD( czIN a irG orn ./..—FEA 2 et....-voss SCE CIETiUt 3/A).1 (10 OCC2 Elosmaz Poz;TABLE TotET CINSUNG CC PAO MUSK SAWS FOR PIE NANO:CAPPER sa Dam Ers9itY (s-, ow ramot ) EXISTING TYPE III - N BUILDING WELDING WAREHOUSE 14( NO PA.Rxm/ APE LANE sofl 'VE. TAt 50%1 ., • .....e.. tz,.. i Boring 3\ ''--. \ I,. ‘‘‘ , , p,,o adt,,,,c/ 1.404E 51.4 KTAR. S/A1.1 TY LINE ADJACENT PRONERIN COST ERALCANC Reference: Site Plan based on untitled drawing provided by SeaCon. EVSFNAG. • ENJUNUNK FENCE stmiciano PAraufic sTALLs ---07tbo;-Vb-71.tN7- LOAENRC AREA EXISIN•i0 CHNINUNN FENCE - RENIoNt Ex•Sralc NALL I Cornerstone '''---- Getechnical, Inc. 4- PARVIP40/ 1.E LAW ERA szE arm. REtatIvE griTING Ca/UNLINK FENM No pAsamv SEE E CETAA. 140.1.1 MUNE 015111,4 WIXOM PION TO CONSTRUCTION Or covEREc VE.AAI CLEAANIA: AREA Boring 1 0 Site Plan LEGEND Planned Addition Boring Number and Approximate Location 60 120 ; Scale 1" = 60' Phone: (425) 844-1977 Fax: (425) 844-1987 o 17625-130th Ave NE, C-102 • Woodinville, WA. 98072 Heiser Addition File Number 1175 1 Figure 2 SEA. TILE 515 j\ st- 1247. 94 KC 1914 NE 9 -23 -4 SCALE: 111 =1001 MAP REV. 3 -3J -19 GN X 163 9905.15 S ' SF Y 186920.38 < /A, q1 T<F d 25- 70 (/u/y) o 0 V /1 0 0 ti kr- ti Ok' n oo v ti o (/) .Q 0, 1 / /00 / 5 _ LN. of N. d35 of G.L. 2, _ -485.05 A0 N B9- Zo -.57 w tk, 0 0 N N h 80 ry/N 89 -20- 57 w !00 ,t9 v \ b 0o O 0+ N OP 0, r NOV 1 0 199, DE'IEEOPME ?s'oZb'4s: - adId • 5i '506'6€9 - iz .5-8'Y / ^ - -n �‘. 1` 1 )CA J;u 1w ��� • 10 47 - 7.67 —3 7 OS • 4. / Q 686i 9r'71 :.A{ p83cJ4 ►s"s e,sr -� a:GS9`9sr9.1 -%=• t(.1 d I b5-OC -58 S 6 io cr4 4a�� 'd �y Y t 44 Q /V pS ,92's2 . W W W V V / V V mOS- oS- 68 a \ 4a 60 N x w ___ — •- -tp—"To-7F -o69^' CT _ 305- oE- 69 N Ai s2.66..965. MS/ 30 411, 0 42•E 00•.40., oVsob 91- '2N 06 -1 /-`11 - c9 0617-9'f • t4 ess OS" ▪ :L b .Ro-M M. MOO MRS. aM01 022140iO Wow aOwObonmOtDnK,41amI I it aLht+ti1 iY _ 1 : • GrIA2/0I PRE-APPLICATION MEETING . . PROJECT, . -.: . • HEISER BUILDING ADDFI1ON 11210 TUKWILA INTENATIONAL BLVD. TUKWILA, WA 98188 GLIENT, ' . �: .:,. .: . .:. GEORGE HEISER BODY COMPANY 725 S HANFORD ST SEATTLE, WA coN&ILiAN78 Im /m8 /ml BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS ° 120 LAKESIDE AVE. STE. 310 SEATTLE, WA 98122 (206)324= 4800 ° FAX, (206)322 =2875 0 0 510 20 30 :. Q ' - -: EXISTING ' .4' UTILITY EXISTING • SIGNAL POLE EXISTING • • FIRE HYDRANIT • DUSTING '.':•. 51631 P08T _ EXISTING PARKING RESTRIPED FOR COMPACT PARKING 'S 112T14 STREET (EXISTING .EASEMENT) 8 5 6 6 25 24 25 8 8 5 8 8. 8 8 2621 2829 x•31 32 8 N. EXISTING GN P05T 33 34 6T• • 1� 42 43 C ;EXISTING .. • FIRE DEPT • CONNECT s EXISTING SIGN POST EX18TNG uTiL cTY Q . EXISTPG OFFICE A-• :05 OCC) .... • 48 EXI3t cHA#LI REI.10vE - PART CF EXIST FENCE . . C . EXISTING LMIDBCAPED 9 S,._ AREA 8 BIKE RAQK FOR 2 BICYCLES • SEE DETAIL MAIL V PARKING SIGNS FOR THE HANDICAPPED • SEE DETAL'5 /AU 9 4 EXIST GATE NEW GATE . • LOCATION 20.. PROPERTY. LINE EXIT BLDG ADJACENT PROPERTY -- EXIST .BUILDING. / / / 'I // �1 1 / / 7/. -PER CM.L NEW -' pi-UNLINK.' EXISTRG •-. CHANLNK FENCE •/F EXIST SLIDING GATE - NEW BLDING GATE \- BMILAR TO EXISTING - NEW TRASH ENcLoSuRE SEE 103/Au REMOVE EXIST / PORTABLE TOILET EXISTING CONC PAD TYPE 111-N EXISTING BUILDING (SEE D5G SHEET A2J) ILELDNG WAREI -DJ9E .. (44-4 OCC). LOADWG AREA / -REGRADING OP THIS AREA PER CAL. : EXISTING CHAINLSK' HENCE NEW LGHT: POLE • N. \Bl� NO PARKING/ FIRE LANE 5GN- • \SEE DETAIL 2 /AU EXISTING 4NLIP1 FENCE .. NO PARKING/ •• IRE LANE SIGN SEE DETAIL 2/411 . 20 • FIRE ACCE• A. I D•. 3'/ I • REMOVE /A EXISTING II II O - =JJ 1 -II�T� 1 et SITE PLAN I" 30' -0• ;}ITE NOTES:: L PARKING ABBREVIATIONS: • . : -. . A 5 • STANDARD CAR PARKING 08' -5' X 19' -0. 1.114) 1111 B. C- • COMPACT CAR PARKING (e' -0'.X 16' -0' MIN) C. WC • HANDICAPPED PARKING (9' -6• X 19' -0) D. VAN • VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING (II' -6' X 19' -0') 1111 2. SITE VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. 1111. SET BUILDING 4 MINIMtZ1 OF 20' CLEAR FROM PROPERTY LINES AS REQUIRED BY 11 VILA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR FIRE ACCESS, SET -BUILDING -A MINIMMI OF 25' CLEAR • _ (HORIZONTALLY MEASURED) FROM EXISTING TRAN5MIS5ION LINES AS REQUIRED BY TUOIALA FIRE DEPARRIENT FOR .THEIR LADDER TRICK OPERATION. • 3. PROVIDE ADA HANDICAP SYMBOLS AT RC. PARKNG .PROPERTY LINE ECO- BLOCK8 PER QvIL • CCNC UA•EEL STOP SEE 6 /AU AIL PFE•:AST COQ 0851. STOP W - NfHdNL RCM FEFFOF 3G Lk ��I�V • .1J '11611111.11 11•11,3■ 0 QW 8ZE • ®O NO PARKING/ : Q IRE LANE SIGN' BEE DETAIL. 2 /AU. - EXISTING CHANLINK FENCE NO PARKING/ IRE LANE SIGN SEE DETAIL 2 /A11 ECO- BLOQKS • • PER CIVIL . REMOVE EXISTING BUILDPKB EASING SPEUWLK WALK AT H.C. TRANSTITION AU SCALE, I•4I' -0' . .02- 006 -00 % REBAR •/.E • WADED Q1E36 AIDGR N PLACE W • tv 1 FEB4R4IIY LOG • WHEEL STOP DETAIL -NOT TO SCALE • VERIFY 0/LOCAL . .. :.CONCRETE 5ANrc4TIO4 DEPT.- .ULEEL•STOP''- A SECTION 0 DUMPSTER ENCL.::.. NOT TO SCALE STEEL PIPE FRAMES' OELDED AT CORNER -'. JOINTS 0 SECOI• SIDE AS , AN•ALTERNATIVE . Aft • I V1• 6C4D. 40 PIPE . 51/ (2)0 GA - FABRCATON ' • (21'10 I1D SCREWS + - •EA. SIDE To 2X6 . T 9 LcNG WRC. TGHT KNOT ROWAN BDe.:BPACE 114• - TOP t BOTTOM ' . RAIL WRCC . 1111 2X6 CONT. 1111 • DUMPSTER DETAIL NOT, TO SCALE - ST. SIDEWALK, - TYPICAL • 15-EEL STOP SEE 6/AJ 0 HANDICAP SIGN: •- SEE 2/411 . Ii moo. %`a___� Llli \l� I 9 GA SWEET METAL MOUNT UFTH 5 c4-4 E RC WIT, HEAD SCAB* (UNITE GACKGROLND) -. 80.5 SCREEN NTERNATIGNAL HQ. - "6YMBOL (UNITE 04 BLUE SACK -: GROUND/ GLEN LEGEND AND BORDER ., PROvIDE VAN ACCESSIBLE• SIGN .. WERE NOTED 04 PLAN . .. 2d STEEL TUBE CLOSE TOP DD AND GRID 5110011L PANT UNRE ' CONCRETE SASE TO BE GUTTERED . 04 HG PAIMFG SPACE TTP. 61,59AGE 644411 COMPLY. W144 ADA HANDICAPPED. SIGN NOT TO SCALE • .. : 2• DI4NETER STEEL TWEE eatE RACK. • . • ANQNOC4=D 14821 CCNCRETE/ABR44LT .. 'q1 vARES BICYCLE RACK CI.. - NOT TO SCALE. , 0 EXTENT CF . ' . 7 PARKING OR EDGE • OF SIDEWALK . UFEEL STOP SEE 6/41.4 PANTED WALKIU4Y STRIPES,. r� PARKING BTRPEB N.G. PARKING . VAN ACCESSIBLE • PARKIN PAINTED HANDICAP'' • • 541850L6 ' BEE 3 /AU . H.C. PARKJN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE' ••••11111111111••••••••• ■.. . /""i ■ ■ ■ ■...■■ 1111■■■ '111■ ■ ■ ■..■■ 1111■■■ •.....■.■■ 1111■ i•■■■■■11•11■ ■.■ ■I 1•.•••••••• 1111■ ■1 I.■■.■•.■•■ ■■■ 11 11.11■■■■ � 1....■■11■■■ ./ ••1 •■ ••\,••..• 11111 I■•.•••••■ 1•••• ■\ 1111■■■.L 1•■.. ••, . ■ •R ■.r'. 1"-♦♦■ 11111. ■■■V .1111 ■. ••• 11..11•■• 11•....11•••••••• H.C. SYMBOL DETAIL NOT TO, SCALE NO PARKING FIRE, LATE . SEE 2/4U FOR 6GN POST DETAIL RECEIVED } ocr 0 9 2001 COMMUNITY I DEVELOPMENT' ,' 0 1 -1/2 SGNAGE TO BE PERPENDIOILAR TO • ROADSIDE AT 15' • - NOTE, 140 PARKN FIRE:' ' LAND SIGNS TO ADHERE TO • FEDERAL DEP. OF .TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS - FOR R5-31 SIGNS. MONT ON ^.OPPOSITE BIDES OF POST TO ALLOW FOR VISIBILITY N BOTH _ . DIRECTIONS. - .. . . H.C. SYMBOL:. DETAIL.. NOT TOI SCALE • . . _ , ' 0 6 Q f 517E PLAN 4 DETAILS A111 SHEETS 63' -4 "* EXIST EAVES ABOVE EXIST:' :,OFFICE TOILET EXIST. ICE REMOVE EXIST EXISTING WALL AND DOOR (E EXIST TOILET/ .. SHOWER AREA - - EXISTING RATED WALL N DOOR (VERIFY FIRE RATING. REPLACE IF LESS BIM 1 •R). EXIST MEZZ ABOVE EXIST STAIR EXI5TNG RATED OVERNEAD DOOR CN Pi8IBLE LINK OR MAGNET 410LD OPEN TIED TO FIRE ALARM,. VERIFY EXISTING. EXISTING RATED DOOR. (VERIFY FIRE RATING, ' REPLACE F LESS TWAIN 1 MR) REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND WALL EXISTING WALL . REMOVE EXISTING TEMPORARY'SNOP N REfI • REMOVE EXISTING PARTITION •• WELpI$- AREA 41- 4'fX -C . 1E�S.E2. 55_ E - l518-& FEPA)R C-.4RAh4), REMOVE EXISTING WALL • 52• -2" REMOVE EXISTING EXIST. CCNC CURB' REMOVE EXISTING OVERHEAD DOOR MC? AN EXIT..- OR ACCESSIBLE ; EXIST COLU-N OF.EXIST WALL 9' -2•(:. QI' -3 ": . •EXISTING EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR PLAN NEW CNANLMC FENCE PROVIDE WARNING . SIGN WITH DURABLE MATERIAL AND RED LETTERING ON WHITE BACKGROUND. SIGN 6164LL READ "DANGER- FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS.. LETTERS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3 INCI1ES'NIGW AND IR -INCW N STROKE MATCH LINE. SEE SHEET A22 , ■ • B' -10 ". .: PLAN SYMBOLS:' NEW EXIT SIGNS EACH W) BATTERY, BACK-UP.- POUER - .. . NEW PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.' NERVY WIN FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATIONS AND N CLASS PRIOR TO INSTALLATIO' ;A' ' ® . 4 FIR AREA SEPARATION WALL ..I HR,OCCUPANCT. SEPARATION WALL : Ram 214R GNU WALL • WALL TYPE S'R100L POR NEW WALLS SEE SLEET' 42.4 FOR DETAILS. SECTION CUT SYMBOL. TOP NUMBER INDICATE DRAWING 144144R' BOTTOM WISER INDICATES' SLEET Nll'IDER 31-ERE SECTION IS LOCATED. PLAN: NOTE$:. L DO NOT LOCATE PORTABLE -FIRE EXTRYAll8NER8 MOIRE THAN 15 FEET OF TRA DISTANCE FRO'I EACH OTNER vERIPY LOCATION OF ALL PORTABLE FIRE .- . 2. VERIFY ALL EXR 681245 514011N N. PLAN... PROVIDE mein* ® - .'NON -RATED O'A) WALL , NOl -RATED WALL — — — -- PARTMON WALL TO BE REMOVED - CONTRACTOR TO . - . VERIFY F LOAD BEARING PRIOR TO REMOVAL • 4 ®/(SI 811'®01.5 FOR RETAINED EXISTING WALLS, � -) DOORS MID WIWOOU$ "' - ' 4 T14I5 AREA TO WORE New PRODUCTS PRIOR TO USE AND WASTE PRODUCTS • PRIOR -10 DISPOSAL IN APPROVED COVERED CONTAINERS.' ' - B. EACH CONTAINER SMALL. NOT EXCEED S5 GALLONS N CAPACITY.. C.-AGGREGATE TOTAL CAPACITY OF STORM LIOWDB -SWALL NOT EXCEED 1.000 .. . • .GALLONS UNLESS REQUIRED. SPILL CO4TR7L DEVICE AND SECONDARY_: . COMA -1 4T-BYSTEM ARE N PLACE. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXISTING OUTDOOR STORAGE A-111: MATERIALS. STORED IN- OUTDOOR STORAGE.-A -III: - - . PRODUCT ••CONTAINER ,'. •QUANTITY :TOTAL • GALLONS • RASH PORT •.! BOILING POINT • . CLASS � . ' 'IFC CLASS SPILL CONTROL 2ND CONTA631DX IEC -SOL. . '2 DRUMS (85GAL) 100 . , -4 DEG F • •BI DEG F' - - W -2. F -3 NOT REQUIRED .'(IFC 80031321 • NOT REQUIRED • (UFC 8003133) .. .. MEK '1 Dal1 (SSGAU B0 • .40¢, GREATER FG F DECOMPOSES: • W 3 F -2 DUPONT sec - 1 DRUM (SSC+AL) 50 GREATER TN/W • 20 DEG F Q9 DEG F W -2 F -3 CLASS -p DUPO4T 3602 ' •1 DRUM (SSGAL) ' • 50 WASTE '' 10 DRUMBS(SSGAL) • 500 (EA V DEG F : ,Q5 DEG.F. . • N FIB • • NOTES. - .L ALL MATERIALS WILL BE ,STORED• IN CLOSED CONTAINERS. - - .. .. .. SHEETS 90' -0.4 (SITE VERFY) 100 -2 "4 (SITE vERIFY) M4TCN LINE - . - SEE - 81♦EET A21 • — COLUMNS PER METAL BUILDING .,MAWFACTUI�R ... V -2Y .. SI1E•vERTFY) PART OF EXISTING BUILDING ... (555 5HEET 421) -// EXTERIOR WALL W/ .. .R -M3 5LUL4TION PER .. ' - .. • 415141.154)11.900 MATCH LINE MANUFACTURER • SEE SHEET A21 NEW 314R DOOR PRO INDICATING THAT TH18 VIDE A SIGN ON DOOR' 16. - NOT ..AN EXIT /ACCESSIBLE DOORI • PROVIDE A SIGN 74441 STEPS • ARE PRESENT AT THE OTHER": SIDE SPRAY • TH- AREA :' 8- OCC • (11132EF. TOILET AND 10' -04 (PER MR) NEW 4 R 451.0 (PER 50481 AND TABLET -B). REM 7154 EXTERIOR WALL FINI314 OF EXISTI TYPE III -N BUILDING PRIOR TO CONS L NEW WALL EXISTING REMOVE STRUCTURAL EES' 7I 1RALO ELEMENTS AT EXISTING 441.11.1.. SEE 6 001.38 FOR 007411.8.. INDICATING 'NAT 71416 IS NOT AN EXIT /ACCE881BLE'I' DOOR PROVIDE A SIGN THAT STEPS ARE PRESENT' AT THE OTHER 5IDE '.,�I :I 8, SEE F5415H SCHEDULE 4T 815457 42:4 4 SEE DOOR SCHEDULE 4T 5HEET 424 10..8EE WMDOW.TYPES 9T.SHEET.42.4 _. IL SEE W4LL 71558 AT 8HEET 42,4 10' -0" EXTERIOR W4LL W/'. — -R -13 INSULATION PER :..: FETAL BUILDING .. _-y COVERED STEAh1 GLEANRIG AREA.'' S -9 CCr 6.14044 CURBS' TYP. AT B -1027 13-103 4 8 -104 4' -4• PAINT B '.STORAGE (176 SE) 19'-0" 1 . : I Tl' -04 6. HIGH CURBSJ. -.. TYP. AT B -102. - B -103 4 8 •104 - - 6. 'MG GIIB RI -WITH R -13 547 25' -0• 29' -0• BUILDING ADDITION FLOOR PLAN : 1/8" PLAN SYMBOLS: ®• NEW EXIT SIGNS EACH W/ BATTERY BACK -UP POWER . . NEW PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS VERIFY WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCATIONS 4140 CLASS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION : - - WALL TYPE SYMBOL FOR NEW.W4LL8 BEE SHEET . " 42.4 FOR DETAILS: ,� - SECTION CUT SYMBOL. TOP. NUMBER INDICATE ©. 1 DRAWING 14 IBER BOTTOM NUMBER INDICATES .. b11EET.NUIBER WHERE BECTION"I5 LOCATED . DOOR MARK SYMBOL. =I 414R AREA SEPARATION WALL ® 1 HR OCCUPANCY. SEPARATION WALL ' T.. +--- -...._ 2HRCMUWALL ® NON-RATED CMS IU4LL .•NON-RATED WALL .,... _ .. PARTITION. WALL' TO BE REMOVED - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IF LOADBEARING'PRIOR TO;REMOV4L " 4,404,/,(1,/ -, SYMBOLS FOR RETAINED EXISTING WALLS, ' ✓' DOORS AND U3NP 25' -0" • 25' -0" 25' -0" 5' -0• t SITE VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS.. SET BUILDING A MINIFWM OF 20' CLEAR FROM PROPERTY LNE AS REQUIRED BY.TU WILA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR FIRE ACCESS. SET: BUILDING -A 11IN21U1 OF 29' CLEAR (I•IORIZONTALLY MEASURED) FROM EXISTING TRANSIMI59ION LINES 49 REQUITED BY TUOULA FINE DEPARTMENT FOR LADDER 7R1.a( OPERATION I. 440 SEPARATION REQUIRED FOR APPROVED' SPRAY BOOTHS' PER USG 3021 EXCEPTION U - - 3 PROVIDE EXPLOSION PROOF LIGHT FIXTURES TO Rccqns 5-102 TO 13-104.' 4. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED LESS 744414 10 FT. OR MORE 714A14 30 FT. - FROM ROCKS 13-102 TO 5 -104. - PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 01.05E TO THESE ROOM5 SHALL HAVE A RATING NOT LESS THAN 20-B ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL" NOT BE LOCATED INSIDE 5. DO NOT LOCATE FIRE' EXTING1154ER CABINETS (FELL) MORE THAN IS FEET OF TRAVEL DISTANCE 12 TABLE FOR ANTICIPATED 444245001/8 MATERIALS USED OR STORED M ROOMS' B -102. 5-103, 8 -104, 13-106 AT SHEET A24 13. PROVIDE SIGNS -N ROOMS 8 -102, 5 -103 AND 5-104 THAT LIMITS PRODUCT STORAGE NOT TO 540550'1.000 G4LLQN8 PER ROOM 6 PROVIDE (114RNNG SIGNS TO ALL DOORS Cr ROOMS' 13-102 TO -B -104 W4RING SIGNS SHALL BE -OF DURABLE MATERIAL W/ RED LE'TERNG ON A UNITE BACKGROUND AND SHALL READ 'DANGER- FLMMABLE LIWIDB•. LETTERS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3 MCNEB.N HEIGHT AND V2. INCHES 84411.000 B FLOOR PLAN . . . gig* 160411031 iiLt36.44 • . . • • 9 -2 1 • • • ', 1 . 01/12/01 , PRE-APPLICATION MEETING .- 1 PROJECT■•••-. :-1 •: ..;• •: - ..- .-1,..-1--.. . :I., . • • • - -• • - - ' • • ;• '• •• CLIENT.. • .. ::... ::. :. '; • -•,,: - ..., • ..1- • - -'.. • ••.- .••• • '' -- - :" --' - • '•'••- " ..GEORGE HEISER Bob* COMPANY .725 S HANFORD ST. ".•,-"' ,.-.,"...:.,H...., ......•."•,•,.. SEATTLE, WA,.....' '.'.--',..-:.;:' ,:-...•.•- ;;:.'-. •••• .. .. . ..„..... , . ,... .. . .,. . • •., . .- - .....; .. ,„ . • .. . . - . . • • ,. OCNSULTANTe, , ...,. i...•....:, .-,-.....:...,...,......•..• ..,-...•.--,..:,...... ::.•,.•::• • .-.- ..--...,.•...:::. - • • .-.. .- ••• '. - • • - . ... . . . , . • •_. .......-•,. .... • ...,. - .._.,.... • -.:.-•:.• . -. g g 2 i 61 g HEISER BUILDING ADDITION.. •.... - 11210 TUI(WILA IHTBVATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98188 .,,,....,.,,',.., .... .., .,•:".,• . . _ , .. .. .. .... , . . . . ... F 2 --•'•-. --....-••••••••••••••.....'.- 1 2 4.- i . ',• _ -:„.,.. F WirAttwoWAITMEWriorWANIII ■K.014■_Ar__■_103W4 WAre-AlrfaiMPAWA01 torerssorarmnmorrAgommewAr.coMFAFArM :1.04 1 - . ' / ,. • ', 1 . 01/12/01 , PRE-APPLICATION MEETING .- 1 PROJECT■•••-. :-1 •: ..;• •: - ..- .-1,..-1--.. . :I., . • • • - -• • - - ' • • ;• '• •• CLIENT.. • .. ::... ::. :. '; • -•,,: - ..., • ..1- • - -'.. • ••.- .••• • '' -- - :" --' - • '•'••- " ..GEORGE HEISER Bob* COMPANY .725 S HANFORD ST. ".•,-"' ,.-.,"...:.,H...., ......•."•,•,.. SEATTLE, WA,.....' '.'.--',..-:.;:' ,:-...•.•- ;;:.'-. •••• .. .. . ..„..... , . ,... .. . .,. . • •., . .- - .....; .. ,„ . • .. . . - . . • • ,. OCNSULTANTe, , ...,. i...•....:, .-,-.....:...,...,......•..• ..,-...•.--,..:,...... ::.•,.•::• • .-.- ..--...,.•...:::. - • • .-.. .- ••• '. - • • - . ... . . . , . • •_. .......-•,. .... • ...,. - .._.,.... • -.:.-•:.• . -. 10/08/01 BUILDING .PERMIT. APPLICATION - ,-- .......•:'.•.. '.: • ._ .,• HEISER BUILDING ADDITION.. •.... - 11210 TUI(WILA IHTBVATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98188 .,,,....,.,,',.., .... .., .,•:".,• . . _ , .. .. .. .... , . . . . ... --•'•-. --....-••••••••••••••.....'.- t. 1 . ',• _ -:„.,.. C name *11015 raw!) 01*10 105 SPRVICATIOKSI,M..4 PROEM REPRESOIND new IM 9441 REIM PC PROEM Cr TIE WOW. PC MO IL ROCCVCCD. =UM WPM% ON OMR= 10 00104 , MOD OIKAINSE ',AMA 115 MCA 15011 OM= If NO 111,11MOI 031111115M110 111.10107 MPS LOS ON VECCUMNS IOU COOISMAC COEU.6.1 DCOVS N.090 OF II@ 10110C11:10. • , • §TRICKER., CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS ° 120 LAKESIDE AVE. SM. 310 ° SEATTLE, WA 98122 .° (206)324-4800 ° 'AX (206)322-2875, , , FAX STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS ° 120 LAKESIDE "AVE. ,, STE.: `310 SEATTLE, , WA 98122 ° (206)324 -4800 or wimp Al ma MORO socancoce. MOM MA MO AIRNOSIORS MR MS MAR RBwIDIlw RIM R MO SS. ROM MC PROM. OF nc RIMMUCOS AM. OR MARIO Ito Nos. MR OR OORMR6E AMOR BR AMR MIMI COMM a MO MMROM I COW... IC M MM. Mt calm COMM DWICE MYDIMRY MAME R[SIMCOI6 FAX (206)322 -2875 : - £ 01/12/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING FROJECtt.` :., ,; _ : HEISER BUILDING ADDITION 11210 TUKWILA INTENATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 cLIENT, :. ..: .,. -,. GEORGE HEISER BODY COMPANY 725 S HANFORD ST SEATTLE, WA CONSULTANTS, 10/0a/01 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION sr STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS ° 120 LAKESIDE "AVE. ,, STE.: `310 SEATTLE, , WA 98122 ° (206)324 -4800 or wimp Al ma MORO socancoce. MOM MA MO AIRNOSIORS MR MS MAR RBwIDIlw RIM R MO SS. ROM MC PROM. OF nc RIMMUCOS AM. OR MARIO Ito Nos. MR OR OORMR6E AMOR BR AMR MIMI COMM a MO MMROM I COW... IC M MM. Mt calm COMM DWICE MYDIMRY MAME R[SIMCOI6 FAX (206)322 -2875 : n m N Omk • 3 g n v a -. 07/17/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING : . PROJECT. .' .... ..- '... II -26 Rcl 10/08/01 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HEISER BUILDING ADDITION 11210 TUKWILA INTENA11ONALBLVD TUKWILA, WA 98188 s. r . • IQ MP 1 ri n m N Omk • 3 g n v a -. 07/17/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING : . PROJECT. .' .... ..- '... CLIENT. - GEORGE HEISER BODY COMPANY 725 S. HANFORD ST SEATTLE, WA .' CCN9ULTINT8. 10/08/01 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HEISER BUILDING ADDITION 11210 TUKWILA INTENA11ONALBLVD TUKWILA, WA 98188 s. t STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECT'S Kama it. o° mom „ 0 S ,1 Mal oc.o000,000 wLL - 1* ROAM v 001119:1. D 81001** . S ! IW Co mews .ffncan lie mom 1011p WW1 0 , 0 0010000 NYpdan 10 DS 00108::. m=1710nux r*00181 Kmaa o On[ *118110* LAKESIDE AVE. ` STE. 310. ° SEATTLE, WA 98122 (206)324 -4800 , FAX (206)322 -2875 • 1° • 0 egi Rfi 7 -6 MIN m 0 F 0 m • , ,. \ , •\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ r 0 0 01/12/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING. '." 'PROJECT. - G-IENT,'... s ' " CO1.49ULTANT9,' I0/08/01 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HEISER BUILDING. ADDITION --... • .i6RGE MISER BODY coMPANY W - ' 11210 TUKWILA INTENATIONAL BLVD 725 S HANFORD ST. ': � TUKWILA, WA 98168 ` SEATTLE, WA - lr/ BUILDING ELEVATIONS STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITECTS 120 LAKESIDE AVE. STE 310 ° SEATTLE, WA 98122 4s f (206)324 -4800 ° FAX ` 0,00322-2875 M! Pinion u Mill, wino ,w I. Ile pa 7. 0[ PMIP0T, or 11[ imP�. PPM Mar -■ 09.0“"plat DIM POW MSS 0i SM.& 10101R M Wed WM 001601101 MO MAPIW[ 030.001I10 0[ Mina Milt Pa. SW 0110.0.3 =SUM 0.1604 0M01a K0 Cap Wt[ 0 DEG Ramps • • ..,. o.,... x_. R... Ii. IDO,.. PO,®I.........,.bW,...s0,0➢fAC, .:.;00�0,tl. I:.LL... • 2o $ • 09/12/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETING '. PROJECT. :. - :. ' CLIENT, - .. .. r - GEORGE HEISER BODY COMPANY 725 S HANFORD ST SEATTLE, WA CON9ULTANid . . im/08/0Y BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION HEISER BUILDING ADDITION . ... 11210 TUKWILA INTENATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98188 ;: " „ cr Tui9O Ill nom mo m co rie fl alN nom MMmIIO MOr MM Mn HWLL ROM M mRFIITOM MIOOfL. o WWR MOV ONl TOSPITURD TO ORM SOP= OR mllm.sc WITHOUT M PRIOR MIDI OOHT OF NO TPP OWW[ •IRIPAIOl W tt IMTnCT MRS WO TPOITICORIS mn10.1 70mcc K.WOQ V net W6TCTP6 STRJCKER CATO E, WA 98122 ° .(206)324- 4800 FAX (206)322 -2875 MURPHY ARCHITECTS ° 120 LAKESIDE' AVE. STE: 310 ' SEATTLE, ]b� 01/12/01 PRE - APPLICATION MEETINGS PROJECTS - ".- HEISER BUILDING ADDITION . 11210 TUKWILA INTENADONAL BLVD TUKWLA, WA 98188 _ CLIENT ' -.; -.. ` " GEoR6E H860 BODY ■COMPANY. 725 S HANFORD ST. WA ". • GONBULT4NTB 10/08/01 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION IISEATTLE, STRICKER CATO MURPHY ARCHITEC LAKESIDE AVE. STE. 310. ° SEATTLE, WA 98122 ` a (206)324 -4800 ;. PART. OF EXISTING BUILDING) - r i." R8EE -8HEET A42) - , '/ // �� - / / / - //' w m: m m m m. �m L EXPOSED. UNDERSIDE OF ROOF - CEILING 510U4TED LIGHT FIX/10ES 1 P. r�r PANT .. - D • 1 PANT TOILET /°,)1.10 STORAGE CLE- ING ."MI NCs:. O ' s _ RELOCATE EXIST.' LIGHTING '4LLOLLWIGE ROCT1 N4ME , " ROOM NO. 'AREA (SF) - ALLOWED - - 4LLOWED . • Wsna/eF . U14TT8 SPRAT' DOOTN AREA B -101 .n000 23 98,1001U PARR S1ORl�laE no, 0b OWI CLEANWG-1 DRIPS B -103 H4 'I11 2181 . PAINT M1XPYs 3 2151.1 - 7014174450 8 -105 .. 32 105345 STEAM CLEANING 8 -108 800 .. 02 '10845 OFFICE/BIEAK MI A- 201.70'3 -203 '412' 12 118644 705.51. 04 44145 CEILBG PLAN NOTES: .. :..: 'L ELECTRICAL. LAYOUT: WIRING'A D'LIGI4TING INDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 2. ELECTRICAL LIGHTING DESIGN NOT TO EXCEED ALLOWABLE SPECIFIED IN LIGHTING 'ALLOWANCE TABLE..... ' -:3. AU. LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL WIRING H OCCUPANCY' AREAS SUCH A8 54 ROCI98.5 -102,• 5 -103, 5-104 84441.E COMPLY WITH H OCCUPANCY REQUIRE-TENTS. .. . ILDMG B 411E21014 CEILING: PLAN 3/16" I'-0" • .15 FRE' HYDRANT..' 4, wATER VALVE • ® WATER. MANHOLE ® WATER METER. . 4 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION Q .CATCH BASK O.. SEWER GEANWT 915 -067 (e"CONC -S) NV-062 (6'C067 -5) • aIN 6211) 1.71 (0' N) 845-1 36((2 P007 51)' SE-4.20 - SE ■3.12 5E -7.34 SE- 7.03 SE -7.67 TELEPHONE YANHO E JUNCTION BOX SIGNAL POLE • UI91TY POLE WY ANCHOR GUARD POST SE-1 3.93 EL 03 .'.1884 -3.59 95-1.29 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION. OF THE NORTH 435 FEET OF GOVERNHDIT LOT 2.81 SECTION 6 TOWNSHIP 23 NORM RANGE 4 EAST.. W.R., IN KING.. COUNTY..WASMNGTON. 10640 EASTERLY OF PRIMARY STATE H194YJAY -.. NO. 1, AS CONVEYED 210 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON' BY OEED ': , RECORDED UNDER RECORDING - NUMBER 3909048. EXCEPT' THAT PORTION CONDEMNED 84 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR ' " COURT CAUSE NUMBER 469557. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF GOVERMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 9:. .. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH.;RANGE 4 EAST. M.Y.. 84•11940 COUNTY. wA501001ON. DES9LIPED AS mums: - COLWENCWC AT THE INTERSEC71091 OF 210 SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 435-FEET OF SAID G0S 00IT 10T 2 NM 111E EASTERLY. . LINE OF.SAID PRMARY STATE. H1CHWAY 60.`.1 AS CONVEYED TO THE.- " STATE OF WASH9NGTCN BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING - NUMBER •3909048: . THENCE' NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY ERIE 2.30 FEET: THENCE EAST PARAUL_L 98114 114E NORTH LDE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2.A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET: • - - - THENCE SOUTNERLY'PARALLEL. WITH' SAD HIGHWAY LINE 230 FEET TO •THE SOUTH 11NE' OF SAD NORTH 435 FEET: . '.THENCE WEST. ALONG 'SAID SOUTH ERE' 110 FEET TO THE PONT OF . BEONNINC: - . SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED ON JANE 3. 1930 UNDER • RECORDING NUMBER 2809159 TO PUGET POWER AND UGH1 FOR' ELECTRIC TRANSMISSON AND /OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INV.352 (6'0ONC -E) NV -3.22 (12CONC -N) NV -3 22 (12'CONC -N) EX 59114 RW -6.66 o1V - -5,66 .. - m1.-6 53 845- 4.43'(12'CONC -M/5) / .. VAULT GRATE' F, • ql .'SUBJECT TO AN EASeMENT- RECORDED' ON JANUARY 20. 1939 .UNDER: - .:. RECORDNG NUMBERS' 3028739 AND 3028740, FOR A WATER RAN - (UNLOCAIEABLE):. }.. `- - STIBJECT TO AN EAS:MENT RECORDED ON JULY 7. 1959 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5053062 FOR WATER MANS (UNLOCATEABLE.} SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT RECORDED ON JULY 9. 1962 UNDER RECORDNG. NUMBER - 5449765 FOR UT0J76'S- (UNU7CAIEABLE): . - SUBJECT .T0 -AN EASEMENT RECORDED ON FEBRUARY 25. 1969 UNDER RECORDING' NUMBER: 6475006 AND 7202290168 FOR INGRESS .AND EGRESS WHICH AFFECTS THE NORTHERLY 40 FEET: SUBJECT 10 AN EMINENT ' RECORDED ON MAY 20. 1991 UNDER'' RECORDING NUMBER 9105301398 TO U.S. NEST COMMUNICATIONS FOR AN UNDERGROUND CON097 575104 991101 AFFECTS' A 10. FOOT WIDE .SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT - RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 20•1991 UNDER' RECORDING NUMBER 19111201395 TO NORINWE51 BELL TELEPHONE . . . COMPANY FOR UNDERGROUND COYWRDCANOIS LINES (UNIDCATEABLE) I REF: SEE SITE BY JIM dOPEUIND DESIGNING. 1/25/95 ' R.O.S. UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8110149005. VOL 29. PAGE 115 R.O.S.'UNDER REOORD9IC I1I1IB19 6108019011. V0. 82. P4101 7'.' .. - DATUM:: 392.29' 146901197'W BENCHMARK • SPIKE ON NORTH 6X OF THE THIRD POWER POLE NEST OF MARTIN WTNER 6IN0•WAY S. ON NORTH SIDE. OF NORFOLK AVENUE . _. _- vauoum mu n 3aN'ldi)T' JO TOM MOM= =MO. « , ]ntmaldM an n IWW MUM VOW MOO =WNW 10 o m T ▪ TOG • . 1 1 ON OM ,414 omd3 0336 SIMI. 1.4.01ORMI mr YAM .]' OVISO OM MOM OM (ova.> emu I . lli86 NNQLOMIHSVAA 'MILS gL2>0a0IgzHW] • %OYES, (GZN 101 10 1r0000661* ]116T90 7.'Nr 14621 GHa SNOIIl110S 9NM33NIsN3 11A10 Nl9 ,6IK 1insNW `awns and aOIs3NY MUMMY AildWIN QLVD Ita31311LIS VM '31LLVJS 1S 0?JOJNVN Ia1f10S szt. '9NI "03 AC109 213SI3N 392103'9 891 B8 :VM 'V1IM lfll d�lg 1VNOIlVN?J31NI V11M 8101 Z 1 1 NOIlIar7V 9Nlalin9 213SI314 Ilaroam N1LWSns LNM3d 9N:aiine ?�z}j ` h p a Q7 < s bx g5 highifflind.fliAM14 S93zolnLmRuEi�'n° 3 i hl M9 IP O • °1z d li zi .6 g 1 4H P • hi 2 01 ,11PPN *1 S b laL g ill gIgh . 2SE.E tsELA P m Ntil m �Q gg H 8ci'adseno a 4�ai88d886osga,�ases=eudE.. 8 o s• 0 510 20 30 • SCALE 1• - 30' ' • - RIM = 271-\ '111\ =1:71 (8• N) IN-V=1:36 (2' PVC 5E) E SSMIH -\\ • RIM =3 2� • INV = -B 7 1 .. • 40 RIM =1.60 • • 84q NV -010 • 'EX.BJ RIM =359 INV =1 J '1 s t . / L,-- N89'21'07 "W - — 11000' /0.SPNALT� 1 II 1, 1\ N. N. N. N. N. N. N. 1 1.2TIi STREET .1> 47 v \ N. :9 • r�>tin�_r�e • MEW © C0`RLi T' • MENT .JJ �s2EC\RD1N 40 9105300398 4. Q' • of DEMOLITION PLAN: :I" . 30' -0" 'FOUND REBAR AND CAP LS# 16213 1 -GA ME ER • •I 6' CYCLONE FENCE 4 INGR.,..$ & R6C.OREUN1S, N _� - -\• RE5S EASEAIELNT \•\• 5006 & 7202290168 - - \, `: NOT APART --l-T• .7) ASPH AL 1^ • • OAK Ex F FF. 4 80 80 141 N 6' CYCLONE FENCE / 9^ '9' 9'$9':1'07 / tt II 1'. 4' J0 • /A \ \. \ • ,, S..is \• !1 • r•- 0 • \ \ • AULT GRATE i, • • • FOUND. - -1/2' BRASSY 6' CYCLONE FENCE N. L \4 kr, s 'I'l 1, N. ..- ( / • 1 L ) ( 7 1.,,. SF: NMOLITION NOTES. . I -. 6' CHAIN LINK 1ENCE- SALVAGE PEN! MATERIAL. CUT OR POST AT BASE 1 ABANDON " 2- QWN UNK GATE (2)- SALVAGE FOR LATER USE. .. 3 - 6' QVVN U96 PENCE - TO REMAIN, ' ' 4 -- OVERHEAD POWEtUNE -.TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. . 5- ASPHALT PAVEMENT- SAWQft PAVEMENT PULL =rm. 6 - CONCR[T[ CUP,B AND GUTTER - TO REMAIN, . - . 7 - -- SIGN; 57131 POLE ♦ BASE, BOLLARDS (2) - REMOVE • . 8 - WATER METER DETECTOR CHECK VALVE- 1.1. -10 REMAIN'. . UNDISTURBLDI -- _. 9 - ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVAL OMITS. (O - ASPHALT PAVEMENT- REMOVE. • , I.1 - GAS METER- TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED • - . 12 - ASPHALT PAVEMENT REMOVE/GRIND INTERFERING POR11041S 2. MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE, - 13- SANITARY CLEAhOUT; ADJUST COVER 70 PROPOSED - ' .GRADE .. -I -. :14 - CARPORT- REMOVE. 15 - PANT BUIDINGI TO BE DEMOLISHED ARER OCTOBER 2002, 16 - UNDERGROUND VAULT- REMOVE 17 -7- REMOVE 18 - LIGHT, POLE. BASE - REMOVE. 19 - RETAINING WALL'- 70 REMAIN 20 - GAS MAIN - TO REAW N UNDISTURBED. 21 - 2' DIM. PRE551.RE STORM DRAIN PIPE - REMOVE- 22 - CATCH BASIN (TYPE I) WITH SUBMERSIBLE PUMP- RBMONG 23 - CONCRETE RETAINING WALL WTM 51EEL ..- RNUNG - REMOVE. 24 16' DIA OAK TREE - TO REMAIN UNDISTURBBED. 25 - FEA0 POLE AND BASE (3) TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED 26- CONCRRE CURB - REMOVE 27 - 6251190 BUILDING - TO REMAIN. 28 - SIGNAL POLE -170 REMAIN. 29 - PRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY' TO REMAIN 30 - JUNCTION BOX - TO REMAIN. . . 3t.- UTILITY POLE- TOREMNN. 32 - JUNCTION BOY - ADJUST FRAME A40 COVER TO - - 33 - RETAINING WAIL - REMOVE. ... 34 - SIGN AND P011 - REMOVE POLE AND BASE. 35 - SIGN AND POLE - TO REMAIN 36 - PRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION.(PD0 - TO REMAIN UNDL5TURBEI, - . 37 - WATER MANHOLE - TO REMAIN; ADJUST RIM TO PROP'O ED. ... 39 - .TELEPHONE 14644101E - TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. - 40 - HIGH TENSION POWER MAST AND EGRET NEST - =RIME 41- PORTABLE STRUCTURE - REMOVE 42 SANITARY SEWER LATERAL - TO RE•419 UNDISTURBED. 43 = A5PULLT BERM - REMOVE 44 - REMOVE Ea5TI40 BOLLARDS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INVERTS AND.UTIUTY • LOCATIONS PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION - ' ` CALL'48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG. 1-800 -722 -4277 0 c 0 0 ELI ICJ O 9 2 9. PROJ.MGR. DBHOLRION FLAN -, :OF. SHEETS: • 0 510 20 30: to EX. CB- RIM =1 60 -,� INV =0 10•• PROVIDE INLET BLOCK AND GRAVEL FILTER RIS=ER TO DETAIL AT C5. I .. EX CB- RIM = 3.59 • UNV =1.29 _: ....�- - EX: CB RIM =2 71 ' IN 1 71, (8' N)� INV= 1.36(- PVC• SE) EX'SSMI4- RIM=-3 2� \ INV = -8.7' 1 :1 \. 1 • -/- A N. WRAP CATCH \ \. BASIN GRATE W/ FILTER \. FABRIC ' • • • N. " `' 1 1 2T11 STREET CONSTRUCTION• \ Nr • ENTRY/EXIT \, . N. rI!a=11=IIIMIT .e. ^. -h �. DEE ROUND _ —I C QLg7'EASLMENT . • 4 -INCR 5 -& EGRESS EASEI16NT \-- . \. RECORDING\NO '9 05300398 REC080146,N 475006'.& 7202290168 - _ . \-. / 'ASPHALT- l 1 f - '4 •1 N59 .p7. 11000• : `�ASPHALT• - - \ • NOT A PT / / COSTING ECO BLOCK WAL11- / • TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED 1 SILT FENCE REFER TO DETAIL AT C5. I GAS METER \ /s..\ 16' OAI' - ' 6 ) TEMPORARY 6 mica.' N .. , CHANUNK FENCE • T T N. T@.APORARY G' tlrGH CWVNUNKfENCE 1' • Ex FACILITY • FT= 4 80 Pk'ae PQoa - ASPHALT^. - _ VAULT GRATE • • SILT FENCE '\\'''' REFER TO DETP�µ AT C5.I N. \ FOUND REBAR AND CAP LSg 16213 • MIST ASPHALYPAVEAEN1T MPORARY . EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN N139':1 07 — 1 W /D 7 Fk • 1 SILT FENCE • . REFER TO DETAIL AT CS. I . - EROSION CONTROL',NOTES • I m0 EROSION CONTROL PUN 511007 6 INTENDED TO OUTLINE EROSION AND .. . SEDIMENTATION'.CONTPDL MEASURES. ALL PROPOSED TEMPORARY EROSION / SEDIMENTATION MEASURES SMALL REMAIN IN EFFECT_ ?ROM INTML SITE CLEARING - - • -UNTIL ANAL SIR STAEI2ATION. • 2:.: -.me SITE WORK CONIRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MNNTAN'AIL ' SEDIMENTATION BA51115. FILTER STRUCTUR05 AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURE AS • • DETAILED ON mG NCO.' DURING ALL STAGES OF C0167W)CTWN UP TO AND INCWDING FINAL WE STABILGATION 3.- ALL UNITS Or CLEARING AND AREAS OP VEGETATION PRESERVATION A5 PRLSCR1Bm ON - .mesE PLANS stew. Be'CLEARLY RAGGED IN 1110 POD AND 0095040) DURING a' 0 4. m0 EROSION AND ssosnit.s.Knom 'te -RDL CONTROL 515705 DEPICTED ON m6 ' . •- DRAWING ARE INTENDED TO BE MINIMUM RGOURE/8NI9 TO MEET ANTICIPATED SITE . CONDITIONS. A5'ODNSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND / OR 'AS SEASONAL COMMONS - - DICTATE ..m! PEt /IT..G 5110ULD ANTICRATE THAT MORE EROSION MO SEDR.@NTATION CONTROL FACIUT16 MAY BE NECESSARY TO INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTRA ON '. THE SITE: CURING ITC COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, R SHALL BE THE OBUGATION AND - .. RFSPO181TNLIIY OF mC PERMITTEE TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BC . CREATED BY AS ACTMI1GS. TM CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. • OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS WO/NAB NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJAWIT -, PROPERTIES. AND WATER OUNITY OF TIC RECEIVING DRAINAGE 515785: MDITIOWIL PAQ11116. OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SNOWIN, A5 MAY BE REOIIIRST. • BY T1IE CRY INSPECTOR AND / CRIME PROJECT DONOR- . 5 .TIE ms IMPERVIOUS ROOFS SUTVAC6 TO TILE mMr)Ereo DRAINAGE 5Y. : 500N -A5 TOWEL 1 '... ` -6. me CONTRACTOR SMALL). A55UR0 TnAT NO CONCRETE OR OD/ILRLTE BY- PRODUCTS ENTEL9 T11e STORMS c0AINAGE 51978/ OR NATURAL STREAM COURSES. . 7. RETURN SILTATION CONTROL ARCS TO ORIGINAL GROUND CONDITIONS AT TIC PROJECT - • EROSION CONTROL- CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AND PROCEDURES CLEARJNG WAITS SMALL BE STAKED AND DEFINED IN TILE RED PRIORT° COMMENCEMENT Or C018TRUCTION. : := : 2 - ALTER SILT FENCE BARRIERS SMALL Be CONSTRUCTED AT POINTS OF WATER RUNOT .. IN TM APPRO.: MATE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON TM EROSION CONTROL PUN PRIOR TO CLEARING MD GRUBBING ACTNrtI6... . • 3. RUNOFF saskar 1056 BARRIERS s1N1 BE ODNSTRUCTW As WDICAIID ON no T'LANS.- 4. SITE =MING AND GRADING MAY PROCEED ITUM/ING THE 1N8TN1AT10N Or TIC - I 0 '.AIL 5t0510N CONTROCMEASURES mum ON TILE RAN AND ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURES REQUItm,TO CONTROL EROSION OVER THE COURSE Or CONSTRUCTION 9NMALL BE MNNTMRD TO PROVIDE TM REOLAREDPROTECTroN EROSION ODNTROL STRUCTURES MAY NOT BE RE MOVED tINTR co: ac-now 6 ':. .. FILTER STRUCTURE MAINTENANCE - • 1 rILT50?ma BARR1H5 SMALL BE INSPECTED SAmeouvrox AFTER EAOI RAINFALL - • MD AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL 2. CLOSE ATTENTIOII SINE BE PAID TO TILE ROAR OF DAMAGED FBNCS. END RIMS . • AND UNDERCUTTING B31CAm FENCES. ' .. .' NECESSARY REPAIRS 10 BARW0t9 OR R A/GEMENT or races OIU1LL BC • 4. sewage DEPOSITS SHOULD DC REMOVED AFTER EACII RAINFALL- THEY MUST BE • REMOVED WHEN Tile LL.V0. Or DEPOSITION REACHES ArrvercamAteur ONE- PWETH[ • 5. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS ROANNING IN PLACE AP:RTM FILTER PENCE BARRIER 15 NO LONGER REQUIRED SNAIL BE DOSSED TO CONFORM TO COSTING GRADE, REPAIRED AND SPJDt9 OR LANDSCAPED.. • G. 505TING CATCH BASIN GRATE WRAPPINGS 51)561 BE PERIODICALLY MONITORED TO ENSURE -PROPER COVORAGC WIZ ALLOWING ORANAGE TO COINTIMR TILROUGIIOII0. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INVERTS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ' CALL 48 HOURS 'BEFORE YOU DIG. • I - 800-722 -4277- : . 9 5 0 PRO1 -MGR. A 5&NSI .10'PORMY 0 05ION SEDIMENT CONTROL FLAN C2.1. OF ' . SHEETS. EX CB RIM = 2 .71. =1 71.•(8".N) • INV =1IN :36\ (2'. PVC SE)_ ' • .:EX �SSMi1 :'. -RIM =3.29 112TF1 STREET 4 25 4 _35 F.5. • 4.78' 4.10 • T.G.• 4:15' 5.98 . - 5:50 F.5. 4' WIDE WHRE PAINTING STRIPE 5.98 4.78. 4.78 .5. • 5.30 T.G. .: 8.00 BUILDING ADDITION 0 510 20 30 SCALE 1' - 30', N it 5:50 -' ..�i n.. • • DRaN..ila• 11 I AULT. GRA 5.80 F.5. 15.50 6.50 F.5. • FOUND REBAR AND CAP • LS# 16213 8.00 T.W. SITE GRADING. PLAN CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INVERTS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION CALL 48 HOURS 'BEFORE YOU DIG. I -800- 722 -4277 -OF • SHEETS :: EX S RIM= 3.29 INV= -8.71 . 20LF -1291? CL50g5L =0.0025 301.E -1291? CL5) 51.=0.002 2043- 12910, CL50g5L =01902 .: 401.E -1291P CL50g5L =0.08' • . 4LF -891? CL52 45' BEND . - W/ BLOCK q48•IP . •!': 93LF- 891 C57 ry WATER DCV_. 851.E -891? CL5 GONG ENCA5EM (12' MIN) • 24LF -89 L50g STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE =0.0025 'STRUCTURE NUMBER. STATION.: ELEVATION. -UGP 85!! ATeR ION/FIELD FY PRIOR TO TRUCTION) TIP 5L =0.0025 FIELD VERIFY EXIST GA5 MAIN LOCATION 4 ELEVATI •JUST AS REGO TO MAINTAIN 6' CLEAR NERT 5° BEND W/ ... \ • 88LF -G01? CL50 g5L =0.002 4.10. VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT -. STA 2 +30 1051.E CL5 2.02 2.20 2.02 8'e (15) S S ON) : • 12' W (01./T)` STA •1 +43 VANED GRATE 40 LOCKING BOLT 501JD COVER W/ LOCKING BOLT.. EXISTING , BUILDING IY E,S. ON). 12' NW (OUT) I Y 5E: ON) 12' W (OUT). _• VANED GRATE W! LOCKING BOLT "(189'21'07 °W • 110.00' 8' TEE W/ BLOCKS •'' BUND FLANGE 301.E -G'DIP CL50 g SL =0.0025 BUILDING ADDITION STA 0 +75- - Li08' . STA 0 +75 . 'STA 0+83 1.198 STA 0 +85 • 2.71 125ON) 12' N (OUT) 12'S.(50 12' N (OUT) • I 2.. E.- ON) .12' W.(OUT) . . VANED GRATE. U )- 0 W co tri 03 tu CD 9 O N ug' t9:ntn: 2.95 8' 5. (OUT) SOLID COVER W/ LOCKING BOLT VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT:. VANED GRATE W/ LACKING BOLT 051 ': SCALE 1' 30' 84LF -80IP CL50 ..: g 5L =0.0025., -CAST VAULT 86LF -8131P CL50 g SL=0.0025.- VANED GRATE W/. LOCKING BOLT 5TA 3 +45 SW (OUT) . -STA 2 +74 .. • 5 (OUT)' 5TA 2 +74 RI 58.5'. '5TA 4 +32 91? C1.50 • R104. .. 0.34 1.83 0.34 l Y e (OUT) 12' W ON) B'enw .12'5(OUT)- VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT.' VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT VANED GRATE W/ LOCKING BOLT 2813 -1 28LF- 129 C05 CB17 • 02L? -8'3IP C15 g SL =0.01. 45° BEND: BLOCK ELEVATION D.EVATION •STA 4 +94 QTY OF TUKWILA. 55-2 (1Y?) ' 1.92- STA 4 +94 .' EXIST EGO BLOCK WALL -- FOUND REBAR AND CAR . LS#.16213... N89'21'07 STORM - LTF.RS SEE C5.2 :: T 45' BEND W /t,? -. BLOCK 8)18'x6' TEE W/ BLOCK" 0' GV .. 251.E -G911' CL52:.. ':... " 108LF 1 .g 5L •701! • CL52 97L1' -801P - `` 45* BEND . W/ CL52 - .BLOCK -. SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 51.E C5. I . . $rIPCL50:= • x,.0025 . .:. DIP -8'DIP CL50 •.01 STA 4 +94 R2 STA 4 +94: STA 4 +63- SN • 85 • 8• N.W, . 8' 0.5 5TA 3 +68 RI3 • STA 2 +94 RI3'.. 4.75 S+8' ROMAC 501 REDUCER STA 1 +90 4.70 8' 5.W. coMPosrrE UTILITY PLAN C.O.T. STD UTLITY PLAN OCT 092001 DBVELOPVIENT CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL INVERTS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. - OF • SHEETS.' PIPING EP/AT1ON (LESS WET WELD TEM - . -- DESCRIPTION REM - DESCRIPTION 1 40 WATT FIORESCCNT LIGHT 19 5.5. GUIDE RAILS (OPTIONAL) 2' Y CAST IRON T29 - - 20 REDUNQNT ALARM/LEVEL CONTROL 3 4.0A55 53 DUCTILE IRON 21 4•. DI PIP[ (BY CONTRACTOR/ 4 PLORG9GQT LIGHT RECEPT. 22 2• WC TRANSDUCER 511 W NG TUBE 5 MESH NR INTAKE 23 4.0 45 [(BONS (CONTRACTOR) 6' 100 CAM VENTILATION BLOWER .- - 24 4• QUICK DISCONNECT BASE 0204 7 750 WATT HEATER W/ T120A05TAT - 25 4' SUBMERSIBLE 504/4616 PUMP 9. 2' EECTRICPL 58540E ENTRANCE - - 26 VENTILATION THERMOSTAT 9 5.5. STm, GULL WING MS 27 MAN. TRANSFER SWITCH (OPTIONAL) 10 3• WET WELL VOLT . 29 9151105 UGMT 5.91101' ' 1 1 : MOUNTED NAM LIGHT (OP110NAy 29 MOTOR CONTR01-09TTR 12' PNEUMATIC UIT 55915T 0115021 30 AUTO HARM DIALER (011105444 13 104)42920 DOWIST -VCIT - -:31 GPI CONVENIENQ OIJf1PT. 14 4' CAST IRON 0204/ . 32 6212470* RECBTCAL (011105444 15 4' 2-WAY PLUG VALVE 33 2 KVA TRANSFORMER. or RffiUIRED) 16 4. 59.156 MIX CHECK VALVE - - 34 BONA WET *61(CONTRALTOR) 17 GALVANIZED 9456 AND 4201' - 35 DURIX ALUMINUM HATCH 18 PRZ.CA5T COVER (OPTIONAL) '. . 36 4 060111 1204 BREAKER PANG. ELEVDESCRIPITON- - VALUE ELEV. DESCRIPTION VALE A P5159 GRADE - - 4.30 .6 . LEAD PUMP CJLL -•9.25 B' PRESSURE MAIN 3.00 1 - LAG PUMP STOP -4.00 C LOWEST INVERT . ' 0.27 1- - LEAD PUMP 5104 -4.75 R2UNO2NT 91611 ([V0. - 1.00 J- 10.9(140. -5.50 E 1(6111240. - -'1.00 K BOTTOM OP WET WELL -7.00 P.. LAG PUMP CALL - -LiS - CAST IRON RING 4 COVER MARKED 'SEWER' PER - WSOOT STD. PLAN B-19b ENCASE WYE IN MANDPACKED CONCRETE FOR SUPPORT :: • G•WT2. SIDE SEWER,- CLEANOUT DETAIL' • NOT TO SCALE .. . . . '0' a VC a• /4 6. 45• BEND. ' PWC (UNLISS - ' ' OTHERWISE NOTED). a 8' . 8'. MI 'i BBB I 1'11 1 1 ..Cl •� IIS�i� II;N -1�Ii INSTALLATION '4 MAINTENANCE STANDARDS . 1. STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC REQUIRES WIRE BACKING TO INCREASE THE STRENGTH OF THE FENCE. WIRE BACKING OR CLOSER POST. SPACING MAY BE REQUIRED FOR D(TRA STRENGTH FABRIC 11 FIELD PERFORMANCE . • WARR6IT5 A STRONG$2'PENCE. - 2. WHERE TH6 FENCE 49 INSTALLED. THE SLOPE SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 3. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY. :.. . 4. IF CONCENTRATED FLOWS ARP EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FE' NCE, THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTED AND CONVEYED TOA'SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. 5. R 15 IMPORTANT TO CHECK THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE PENCE FOR SIGNS OF • THE FENCE CLOGGING AND ACTING AS A BARRIER TOFLOW AND . THENCAUSE CHANNEUZATON OF FLOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS - OCCURS. REPLACE THE FENCE ORREMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 6. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED V.11125 T112 SEDIMENT 15 6 -INCH25 111611. . • 7. IF THE FILTER FABRIC (62010(1112) 1155 DETERIORATED DUE TO ULTRAVIOLET BREAKDOWN: R SHAUBE REPACLD. . " SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. • . USE STAPLES. WIRE RINGS. • OR EQUIVALENT TO ATTACH - 148150 F05T5.. . ... 2 -.2' BY 14 Ga. WIRE -- OR EQUIVALENT. IF STD. STRENGTH FABRIC USED - FILTER FABRIC, POST SPACNG MAY INCREASED TO 8' IF WIRE - BACKING 15 11560.. .. - NOTE: PILT6R FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INST/LLED'ALONG - - HONG CONTOUR WHENEVER • SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE MIN. 4- .4' TRENCH - BACKFILL TRENCH WITH NAnve SOIL OR 414 •1.s-.. ''WASHBD GRAVEL 19DVIDe T11R1/51 FIRE HYDRANT TO BE 1AINT® WTDI TWO COATS Or PARWIE3T CASE YELLOW 03472): 11YDR4NT5 ARE TO EQUAL MU0(ER '. /A- 423'06004.9 MED4WON 41 2545.... - .' - MYDRANTS SHALL CONFORM- TO'AW.WA. 5P204CATIONS • !. C 502 -54; 51111129 COMPRESSION TYPE AND SMALL HAVE A TWO PIECE BREAKING FIANG6 WITH BR2ARING'THIMB(E AT THE GROUND UNE OR STEM; SMALL HAVE A'5611.01UNG DRY BONNET WITH PACTORy FILLED RE0ER.VOIR HOLDING ' .. APPRQfaMATELY 005065 Or OIL 011 RESERV049 SHALL BE 50 D61GNED A5 TO GIVE A COMPLETE WB910ATION OP 5161.1524041114.4! THE 1 40RNT 15 01295120. -THE UPPER . MIN. 3' 4 MAX' 10' -. • • - MECHANICAL JOINT 12YD. WASHED ROCK T \ - DIM: 1 I .3 .:2 -3/4- ASPHALT r COATED 5120. UWISTUI22) - 5MACF16 RODS. / 5011 I. 11WRANT5 SHALL 9E EQUIPPED WITH-IV/0 2 5'.N5 T. MOSE 10915 AND ONE 5- STORM PUMPER DA ARG6 ..AND 5'114(1 HAVE A 1 A ' PENTAGON 0124.4)11 012956156 HYDRANTS 751 HAVE E A 6' M.I. 9017054 CONNECTION AN114DS 14- AWN VALVE OPENIN NUT. 5951 G, AND 5IIM1'HAVE 19- ABOVE - . GRADE IEV0. TO THE C2 NTBt OF:THE PUMPER 01901496E PORT... - ' • 2. WHERE NO CURB 4 GUTTER 15 INSTALLED, PLR[ HYDRANT SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY V SE 3. HYDRANT INSTALLATIONS TO BE PER THIS STANDARD PLAN AND REQUIREMENTS OP TUKWILA MUNIOPAL COQ 14.24 AND CRY ORDINANCE. 4. 1 0641815 IN 144420,. RE0CATED OR OTHQBMSE WORKED UPON A9 A R6ULT Q A PROJECT 51914 '; " 96 0125/115 1415160. .. l 5. -60295 BONNETS SMN.L 96 PARN4.9T PDREST 617®! (/3523): FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 4 SETTING DETAIL • . � 50110 5041E - V41V! STD BOX .COVER MARKED - WATER- THICK CANC, - 'COLLAR am') .4'. Di TEE D6L714966- 5TANDFIOE WRAP 91DE5AN E WI 11 - RE MESH DR HARDWARE 2 00TH . WIRI L1. OPINING AND covet - I ✓ WR11 P411LR FABRIC..''. t.- ^A - _ WOO TO ® 9' WIRE M61-1 4 name-- WRAPPED AROUND - GRATED INLET'. SECTION VIEW INLET BLOCK 4 GRAVEL FILTER NOT TO SCALE • _ .. 0 455 'B-. ASPHALT CONCRETE . PAVEMENT .. I I =1 11=1. I I I 11 I II I I 1 11 I 11= 554- MINUS CRU54120 _ 5UR640NG TOP COURSE • 1 14' MINUS CRUSHED ROCK BASE • .- COURSE PER WSDOT 5TD..5PEC 9 -03.9 (3) (REFER TO NOTE) • 1. BASE COURSE AND SUBGRAQE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE MODIFIED PROCTOR (55TH -D' ( 557). - - - 2. A SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ' ENGINEER 51411 CERTIFY 1HAT THE ABOVE SECTION 15 ACCEPTABLE PRIVATE STREET * PARKING LOT SECTION''. NOT TO SCALE 6.00 TOP WET - 1.5. 6• THICK' DISCHARGE WEIR - ENERGY DISSIPATOR'' M:' OF '.'SHEETS. ,660-SA • 2 ND. 1012P ND. 30307 0I8M0740 DIAMOND FUME RATE Access DOOR INSRCUON COVERS ' - IMITITOo ITI;e0 fi eI1 INLET. L• - �� OIL RETAINER - :: " -'%r. FLOW DIP7115BR" DAME GRIT/SLUDGE • .RETMN0R WEIR - 5AMPIING TEE PIP N°. 3030-P °L wow" END. LAN - COVER wcr SECTION A -A ' SECTION B-B OIL / WATER SEPERATOR DEVICE- . NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES: -. - - 1.. STORMflLTR BY 9TOWMWATER MANAGEMENT. PORTLAND OREGON (503) 2403393 ' 2.. ALL STORMflLTER5 REOUIRO REGULAR MAINTENANCE. REFER TO OPERATION AND _ MNNTEUNCE MANUILL FOR DCTAIIS. - -" 3. PRECAST CONCRETE VAULT C016TRUC37004 ACCORDANCE WTm AS-TM 0356. 4. E%TW1N. 717100 APED CQ1nJ0G:RE8t TO C4. I. -. 5.'- - ROMAC 501 RUMBLE COUPUNGS TO 5ET I 8-0101ES OUTSIDE FACE OF WAIL 6. ANTI - FLOATATION BALLAST TO BE SET ALONG ETDRE LENGTH OF BOTH SIDES OF FILTER - 7RElA57 CONC. VAULT- A OUTLET PIPE 12 -INCA DIA. OUTLET . • .. BAY,: -ANTI-OLOATATION"- BAUAST 51A8 Iii ' T ALTERNATE nee .LOCATION Annamiskieti INLET INLET PIPE .12 -N01 DUL 111111.11111•1 EMMEN Liir.11o. W :.�,M.Y 7' ei� '. --,maxinaraerinems.-clia MIEVARTKIMINISMEN RADIAL FLOW' -- - PIPE MANIFOLD - '' G' x 1 2' PRECAST STORMFILTER13" =- PLAN VIEW NDT TO SCALE - - ... -. 337(3' DIM4)ND ,TRAFFIC BEARING -.. ELATE DOORS I•?.) UD RYP4 42-20 '... . PUN COU?UNG 01E1.G3 DI551PATOR (T0.4 1 X 4. SUMP JOINT SGAI/lPlT (TYPJ. - UW6t(M.): FLOW SPREAD:M.0173 - I•I ® :' - < e, ��1�- 1 ■cam■ �I R��� PIPE E MANIFO D em, DISSIPATER" NOTE: IS. 1N - 1.2.01T - 2.3' MIN. 6''x. 1 2' PRECAST STORMFILTERTM' SECTION A-A - • NOT TO SCALE ... -. . 660.31 TOI 1.350188. 012.7 DIAMOND COVERS DYPJ • ND. 3030 -r 0(4A10N5 PATE COVER 660 -SA. ' MOW.ORFU5M INSrecrwN • . ' SAMFUNG Tee. OIL RETAINER •UTIUIY VALJLr 6G0-58 6.750 LBS. M. GRRPSWOGE RETAINER WEOt ISOMETRIC VIEW . :0111 1 /1r -'La 1 IDe EN. "' PIM (52)' (A2)' VA (021 r r (L._) (s144.46) • 1, PI. (PIN) (I�s�) (d0 7 - 11 11 i%:- • - u - 3/4 u �` • ,1 1/ a 171 , . 1r • 22 iA .. . 447 L - 3/4 ..24 • 10-2 11 i�Y 20 224 44 3/4 • 7/8 24' 04 D 133 S1. er • •1/ , A _ m 7/6 • �. lu E7 a'? . a• u , 10. M• 1NFm. min• '' -320 •Y 1133//40 a 1/2 m > _u - 1'3/• 4.3 20 • 4' m 72 1. SA •A 220100. ammo. 42. WS= " .. • 40 Y `T L 24 2 A 7.0 1/0 -WD . - - CONCRETE MOCKING BASm ON.' 200 Tel PRC99URE AND 2500 - CONCRETE• AND 2000 PMP MIN. 5010. BEARNG CAPACITY." . PO. 8• OIA'noir fACH do. • MR INLET • OUTLET • MAR. CAPACITY: 450 gal. I'LOW'0 "15 MINUTE RETENTION: 30 g P.m. GALVANIZE) (ASPHALT COATED STEEL. THREADED RODS AND .. RR CLAMPS _1.A... SEE NOR 12 ' 4r4'' UNLM9TUROE0 '. • VELTI/AL. BLO(.TJNG FOR -• . 1 1 114•, 22 NF; 30', 45'.'. NVID 90• BEm9 CONCRETE BLOCKING ' NOT TO SCALE • VALVE BOX TO EC • R101 STANDARD OR APPROVED OTMHt • CARE. 70 Be MIGNED WT N PIPE UNE 5e DETAIL 4' MN �IiI���VI 2. 5011ARE OPERATING NUT 1 /3 1OT*L LEIGTE • • 4M•DM. 1/B• MIN. - TH40tNES5 -(471 SOLID METAL STOOL 3/8' SET SCREW 2 14. 50UARE tNSID2 MEASUREINT. INS• MIN. TM1a0B5 VALVE OPERATING NUT TENSION , 1. E0Bb10N9 ARE REQUIRED WHEN T112 VALVE NUT IS MORE THAW 5 PET BELOW PPN15nE) GRADE • ' 2. ONLY ONE INTENSION, MR19AJM Of 3-FEET LONG. TO BE USED PR VALVE . :9. MABMUM Q5TANCE BETWEEN OPERATING NUT Of 2T0I510N AND 7N15n • GRADE TD BE 24RET.. 4. AIL C015/31019 ARE TO at MADE OP DIM AND PANTED *1141 TWO ' WATS Of METALPAINT • CARD MSS VALVE BOX DETAIL NOT TO 5CALE 1 LO• we THRUST BLOCK -TABLE . MIN BEARING AREA AGAINST UNDISTURBED 5O•L >• 0,2) (52)' (A2)' VA (021 r r . 1 .. 1 •• 113" 7 - 11 •' 10 :0 12• le is 22 14 19 •. 12 1r 29 22 1 8 1r m• 43 m 20 224 1 24' 04 90 3!. er 101 A .SS _ m • 28. 4r lu E7 123 171 711 40 33 47 .. 27 M• a 7 2 33 140 '40 71 38 =or= 1 1Q ■/ nuo RE. (/6 WO • 0110 FIANCE 09 9141+_02 WM POE 1. DURING AREA or CONCRETE mer -cepa BASED• • ON 200 P° PR838u0D AND SAFE SOIL BEARING IDAD Of 2.000 70•005 702 20uARE FOOT • 2. AREA MUST BE APART® /OR GMe PAID 5128 PRe951.RB AND 301 05/10410/ E 3. CONCRETE 81DODNG WALL DE CART W PUREE AND NAVE A M00AL■A OP 14 SQUARE )SOT BEARING .. • AGADI$T THE PITTING. .. 4.'' OUXR SHALL WAR AGM/WW1/KZ ow MD 2 • WAIL W QEARO. J00118 TO P604T TARING 47- OR INNANTLDr. OP 1001T. ' 5. CONCRETE SHALL DETAIL BIOC3ING ADEQIAR TO, - *11 14m PIA.187 PR851.12e J5 VAIL AS 70 ' . NIIMUOUSLY WIT STNAD OP6tAT10(1 MUSEUM ' 11 1 /•• ®0:, UNDER ALL COCOONS Of 515iVICG G. 1111957 MOM 5 MANGO= TO ACT A9 A 919UD " FOOTING. TIERBORE 216011 Of MOCK MUST DC 801.1 .5 OR UM DAN Vs TV 0171117 5OM THE 6.00000 ` 5UNNCE TO NE BLOWS BASE ' 7. ra OUANTITYa CDICR0T0 1X•50 UPON 1412 DENANCE . - BETWEEN The pDt NO T)IE uNOBTURBED 901. • B. *740 ALL PmINGS WTm MASTIC 5119011210. • ' 9. CONCRETE WALL ORIGDIATe PRGM COMMRQAL 64.101 111849 'II•II- c till Kt* ]2 1/2• ®0, M145• ELBOW 9250 I YARD MIN, MEGALLIG ' 'JOINT RESTRAINT CONCRETE TO TOP OF TIE FLEE • o�J ELEVATION -VIEW w 5MAceLE Roo RCf INTO 5510E ' OP 711E1401 2 YARD MIN. 1 :4 w• 5MACAIE ROD COATED W7 COAL TAR 4' CHANNEL OR NUT dWA -HUR +' 1-13[AM 5T155. END VIEW PLAN VIEW DEADMAN• TI-1 45° BENDS - • NOT TO SCALE _ 42•- QA CAST MANDIE ewe j000 PATTINDTYPICAL 0 ODOD Q` ,I o0D ODOOO000 001 0000001 0000000 D000001 III 00 'LB/LUNG PAD (1Yf . • - 1/B•aw•a Iw• m• -I I- 11/4 NM DETAIL A • 3/r 5/W-1 1 14C 4 2' 5TAINIL78 STEEL - 30CP.ET ALTER) MEAD CAP SCREW. _. 1/4' 11/2- 1 1/2• '1': UD TO BE DESIGNED RCM 11-20. - LOADING W11E1 INSTALLED IN ROADWAY. . 2. OPC 554,03 OR APPROVE) 514E .4/••.) 3/4. DETAIL A' • CATCH BASIN SOLID COVER NOT TO WALE . MATOI MISTING STREET =DON - 9EE •41/EAE0 PATCHING STD. ELAN C 5.2)' 1 .3 • 00111 (MAX. WI17R1) 5/8' MDI115 arose= - RO 7,UNLESB 0•2180350E APnROM of me am. MIN 3'' MAX. Dem. 8402713. •' ' BUDGING: 5/60471 CRU3ME) ROOL ALL 6ALA71LL WALL BE . OPTIMUM 0E61re r 101 CM, PIPE O.D. O.D. + 24 -21NCH (MAIL WIDTH) 'LT o ca Og1CO© R/WCFCpFrt:17y TRENCH BACKFILL - STREET • NOT TO SCALE 0 m .E- . • "O . i = < < '. Q cD r t o BUILDING PP.RMIT BUBMRTAL' PROI.MGR AL 9801 DETAILS• . C5.2. OF SHEETS 10 /9/01 BUILDING PERMIT. SUBMITTAL'. HEISER BUILDING ADDITION :. .124i 0 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD . TUKWILA,• WA 98168 • CULYITI GEORGE HEISER BODY CO., INC. .725. SOUTH HANFORD ST SEATTLE, WA., 120 LAKESIDE AVE. SUITE 310 CON5ULTANTS, CIVIL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS 2745 124711 AVE. 1 IffiltvuE, WA woos. co 025) 16. 252052 7M 025) 52207 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON • 98122 (206) 324 -4800 1*751*5 u2W4I 0 2* W061 �m ® Lp2M W2 20 AW120W1 M1501* 12 * MG66L ID WY WD� 1* ome.1 nn O aa. O2 O1)EA'/6E MOM' M W1102 9 61211 AA 44407210 l¢ 0121221. CM .122171246 NAL KLEMM Or 27252 2224221240. FAX (206) 322 -2875 BUILDER "/ CONTRACTOR' • RESPONSIBILITIES .: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDER /CONTRACTOR •10 INSURE THAT ALL PROJECT PLANS AND 'SPECIFICATIONS '`'COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE REOUIREMENTS.OF ANY GOVERNING BUILDING AUTHORITIES.' THE SUPPLYING OF SEALED.. ENGINEERING DATA AND DRAVANGS' FOR THE . METAL BUILDING SYSTEM DOES. NOT IMPLY: OR• CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT • THAT. METAWC BUILDING COMPANY 'OR ITS DESIGN • ENGINEER IS ACTING AS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FOR.'A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: ' . THE CONTRACTOR MUST SECURE ALL- 'REQUIRED APPROVALS AND .:PERMITS•FROM THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY AS REQUIRED.::. , . , :APPROVAL OF- METAUJCS DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS .INDICATE. THAT 'METALLIC 'BUILDING' COMPANY ' CORRECTLY • INTERPRETED. AND. APPLIED THE REQUIREMENTS, OF .THE CCNTRACT •DRAVANGS AND, SPECIFICATIONS. . (SECT. -4:2:1.'AISC• CODE •OF STANDARD - PRACTICES, • 9111 ED.) . W'HERE'DISCREPANUES EXIST BETWEEN METAWC'S STRUCTURAL STEEL PLANS AND THE- PLANS FOR OTHER. TRADES; THE STRUCTURAL STEEL, PLANS SHALL GOVERN. (SECT. 3.3.AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE 91H ED.) DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF ANY 'MATERIALS IN; THE STRUCTURE. WHICH ARE-NOT FURNISHED BY. '. • METAWC • BUILDING COMPANY •ARE .THE RESPONSIBILITY'OF 194E CONTRACTORS, AND ' ENGINEERS 'OTHER ;.THAN METALLIC, BUILDING COMPANY'S ENGINEERS • UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED.. • THE CONTRACTOR -IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL- ERECTION OF..''STEEL AND•ASSOOATED WORK IN' COMPLIANCE NTH :METALUCBUIIDING- •COMPANYS :TOR .CONSTRUCTION••DRAWINGS. • . • - •. PRODUCTS •SHIPPED TO BUILDER OR HIS•CUSTOMER SHALL' BE • INSPECTED BY- BUILDER• IMMEDIATELY -UPON ARRIVAL CLAIMS FOR SHORTAGES ,012 DEFECTIVE MATERIAL•IF NOT 'PACKAGED. MUST BE. MAILED -TO METALLIC IN •• WRITING. WITHIN:FIVE (5) -DAYS 'AFTER. RECEIPT OF THE SHIPMENT: HOWEVER,.- IF. A DEFECT 15.OF -SUCH A NATURE THAT REASONABLE NSUAL.INSPECTION WOULD FAIL `TO;DISCLOSE IT,'THEN - THE - CLAM MUST BE MADE VA THIN FIVE (5) DAYS '- • WC•WI AFTER THE BUILDER LEARNS OF THE DEFECT ;METALL-NOT BE UABLE':FOR ANY.DEFECT- UNLESS . CLAIM' -IS' MADE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR. AFTER. DATE OF..-THE ORIGINAL SHIPMENTBBY:METAWC -TO BUILDER • • OR' HIS CUSTOMER. METAWC WILL- BE GIVEN- A.REASOA'A5TE;CRT iUMITY TO INSPECT DEFECTIVE MATERIALS UPON• RECEIPT. OF CLAIM BY_BUILDER.. ' . • . • 'IF A'DEFECT, I5 OF'SUCH- NATURE THAT IT, CAN BE REMEDIED BY -A FIELD OPERATION AT THE. JOB SITE WITHOUT • THE NECESSITY OF RETURNNG - THE-MATERIAL - TO METAWC. THEN, UPON .WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF METAWC T14E•BUILDER MAY .REPAIR•CR CAUSE •THE -MATERIAL TO- -BE' REPAIRED AND•METALUC - - ' • WILL-REIMBURSE THE BUILDER FOR THE COST OF1HE REPAIR AN. ACCORDANCE PATH -THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. ALL BRACING -AS- SHOWN. AND PROVIDED BY METAWC FOR .THIS • BUILDING IS-REQUIRED .AND SHALL 'BE •_ INSTALLED BY THE ERECTOR AS A-PERMANENT PART OF THE STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY SUPPORTS, SUCH AS TEMPORARY GUYS, BRACES, -FALSE WORK,' CRIBBING _OR OTHER. ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR-THE ERECTION OPERATION WILL BE- DETERMINED 9110 FURNISHED -AND INSTALLED BY. THE ERECTOR THESE. 'TEMPORARY: SUPPORTS' WILL SECURE' THE STEEL •FRAMING, OR..ANY PARTLY, ASSEMBLED STEEL FRAMING, AGAINST, LOADS-COMPARABLE IN INTENSITY.TO THOSE FOR WHICH 1941 STRUCTURE WAS DESIGNED, RESULTING FROM WIND,' SEISMIC FORCES- AND ERECTION' OPERATIONS, 61JT, NOT- 1141 LOADS- RESULTING•FRCM -:THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK 'BY•'•• •. OR THE -ACTS OF OTHERS; NOR SUCH UNPREDICTABLE LOADS AS :THOSE DUE TO TORNADO, EXPLOSION .OR COWSION. (SECT. 7.9.4 AISC CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE, 9TH: ED.) • DESIGN OF GUTTER AND • DOWNSPOUT .IS •A FUNCTION OF THE • RAINFALL- INTENSITY AND AREA-10' BE: DRAINED DESIGN PARAMETERS UTIUZED -ARE IN. ACCORDANCE %NTH THE ':9986 LOW RISE - BUILDING SYSTEMS MANUAL' AND /OR .THE- 9TH 'EDITION -OF_ THE ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHIC STANDARDS, -AS APPLICABLE .PROPER OWNER MAINTENANCE • DICTATES THAT THE DRAINAGE. SYSTEM SE KEPT FREE- AND. CLEAR OF,OEBRIS AND /OR ICE. AT'ALL TIMES TO ENSURE PROPER FUNCTION OF THE .GUTTER ,AND 'DOWNSPOUT. IN THOSE CASES-WIIERE THE OWNER/TENANT OF -A PROPERTY;'•', IS UNWILLING OR UNABLE TO PROVIDE. PROPER MAINTENANCE, WMINATION.OF.'GUTTER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED • PRODUCT - CERTIFICATIONS METAWC BUILDING COMPANY IS A MEMBER OF THE METAL BUILDING- MANUFACTURERS - ASSOCIATION, . METAWC BUILDING COMPANY'S FABRICATION AND PRODUCTS ARE COVERED BY' ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING. APPROVED FABRICATOR• OF PREFABRICATED BUILDINGS. AND :COMPONENTS REFERENCE 80 REPORT NO. FA -337 2. SBCCI COMPLIANCE REPORT. NO 94619 3. AISC METALBUADING CERTIFICATION PROGRAM - 4. CITY OF HOUSTON APPROVED .FABRICATOR, (REGISTRATION N0. 164) 5. WISCONSIN PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER; 200115 -11 6. CLARK COUNTY,. NEVADA APPROVED FABRICATOR 7. CITY. OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIAAPPROVED TYPE 1- FABRICATOR (LA$1604) 8. CANADIAN WELDING BUREAU CERTIFICATION' TO CSA 'STANDARD >W47 1 N DIVISION I' (SYMBOL 9. TEXAS DEPT., OF INSURANCE PRODUCT EVALUATION • RC -34 • APPROVAL NOTES GENERAL "NOTES ' THE STRUCTURE UNDER THIS CCNTRACT•HAS BEEN DESIGNED :AND DETAILED -FOR THE LOADS "AND CONDITIONS' • '.STIPULATED IN DIE 'CONTRACT AND SHOWN. ON .THESE' DRAWINGS. :ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OR, REMOVAL ',OF ANY• COMPONENT PARTS,' OR THE 'ADDITION OF OTHER • CONSTRUCTION - MATERIALS OR LOADS MUST BE'.. -DONE' UNDER- THE'ADVICE AND .DIRECTION OF•A REGISTERED ARCHITECT, CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL _ENGINEER:: ': ' METALLIC BUILDING COMPANYWILL •ASSUME NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR' ANY - LOADS NOT INDICATED. '' • • - • • THIS METAL ;BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH METAWC BUILDING COMPANYS 'STANDARD -PRACTICES WHICH ARE BASED • .ON PERTINENT PROCEDURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Of, THE: FOLLOWWG:ORGANIZATIONS AND CODES. 1. AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL 'CONSTRUCTION.' • 'SPECIFICATION 'FOR 194E DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION 2.. AMERICAN' IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE: 'SPECIFICATION FOR - TINE- DESIGN OF COLD FORMED STEEL STRUCTURAL ,MEMBERS' . .. • AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY: , "STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE' AWS D1.1 4. METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER'S ASSOCATION:' -LOW RISE BUILDING SYSTEMS MANUAL• 5 INTERNATIONAL' CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS: "UNIFORM BUILDING -CODE" 6 SOUTHERN: BUILDING CODE CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL' ''STANDARD BUILDING CODE' 7 . BUILDING OFFICIAL AND CODE: ADMINISTRATORS:INTERNATIONAL 'BOCA NATIONAL. BUILDING CODE' • BUILDING DESCRIPTION: ENDWAIL:FRAME TYPE • BL9c 91 BLDG: •A• -'SST 85'-0 .200,-0 35' -3 / 37 -4 1:12 101-09 WM FREI N9- E10''M( tor BLDG. •8• • 11 57-8 10'-2 / 11' -2 1:12 110 ME • . NO IRYE WARNING: IN NO CASE SHOULD GALVAWME STEEL PANELS BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH LEAD OR COPPER. BOTH LEAD•AND COPPER HAVE HAMAFUL CORROSION EFFECTS ON THE ALUMINUM ZINC -ALLOY COATING MEN THEY ARE USED'N.CCNTACT WITH GALVALUME "STEEL PANELS EVEN RUN -OFF FROM COPPER FLAORNG, PARING. OR TUBING ONTO GALVALUME SHOULD BE 'AVOIDED RASE COT0RI 44 9•ETN0 BURET 11PE N0[AION 113 SRL RECESS 1 544. •"110UNE -TER / 4106144E ROOF 441 O- BT 450416CNRFR0 BY mesa). Rocca) Nrtf:13 10-250 FOALED ELSE1RW 264 . YEW /ICU WAIL : SELF CRUX 90E15 Amu CAPPED TIM:. (1/9- FOP RNE15 Al SPUMES) . •• ) STITCH Rp0(. ., AN011.BOLTS 3/r0 26 ra MEMBER WAIT(' F 12 K IS ) " S5T01WAU(. 1 14.3 ") r ❑. 26 FATE • • RARE TO ROOF: • . STEM . RAKE TO RIMY - . .: STITCH NARRANTIFS U1 93 260 26 4a. GUTTER TEO DOl6 OTTER 40 R00: COafR.IRN: FOXE'AI E: BF DOERS, BY.41111NC MAWFACRRER 20 YR ROOF 260. 109 COMER *001110645 RATUE4`1•,RFIER TO fOLEILE -404 WNML Y RCN ROM CP 111ERIW, 20 YR WAIL ' 26 a1 WOCAS Brows k,Di Ciosurn BUILDING -LOADS 8- -NATIONAL- BUILDING CODE OF CANADA. - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS STRUCTURE IS DESIGNED UTILIZING THE LOADS' • MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF STEEL PLATE USED IN THE FABRICATION OF PRIMARY. RIGID FRAMES. AND, OTHER PRIMARY STRUCTURAL 'EXCLUSIVE OF COLD- FORMED SECTXINS, CONFORM .TO ASIA -A529 OR•A -572 . •FLANGES..WI194 THICKNESS OF .ONE "INCH OR LESS AND VADTH OF 12- OR LESS' CONFORM TO A -529 WITH A MINIMUM YIELD POINT OF,' 55,000 psi. FLANGES GREATER THAN 1•. IN THICKNESS- OR 12• IN WIDTH CONFORM - .TO.A- 572.WITH A MINIMUM YIELD POINT OF 50,000 psi. WEB' MATERIAL CONFORMS TO ASTM- A36'MODIFIED VAIN - A *MINIMUM WELD POINT OF 46.000 psi. MATERIAL .PROPERTIES OF'PIPE SECTIONS CONFORM .TO ASTM -953 TYPE E. GRADE B WITH -A MINIMUM YIELD .POINT OF 35.000: DS. . MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF HOT-ROLLED STEEL -MEMBERS 'CONFORM - TO, THE . REQUIREMENTS-OF ASTM -936 OR 'A572 • WITH ,A "MINIMUM - YIELD. POINT OF 50,000 psi MATERIAL. PROPERTIES OF- COLD ' „FORMED. LIGHT GAGE STEEL MEMBERS CONFORM TO- ASTM -A570 OR A607 GRADE 55. moons) VAIN :A'MNIMUM . YIELD POINT OF 57,000 psi.: - - - `' MATERIAL PROPERTIES - OF. ROOF /WALL SHEETING. BASE METAL 'CONFORM TO ASTM- A792-GRADES D OR'E 'VAIN - •MINIMUM YIELD POINTS OF 50,000 psi AND 80.000 psi RESPECTIVELY, AS REQUIRED 'BY.. DESIGN , COATING OF BASE ' MATERIAL IS 55% ALUMINUM -ZINC ALLOY IN ACCORDANCE' WITH AZ55 SPECIFICATIONS: • CABLE UTWZED'FOR BRAONG CONFORMS TO.ASTM A475. ROD AND ANGLE :UTIUZED:FOR BRACING MEMBERS CONFORM TO.ASTM A36 '.' STRUCTURAL JONES WITH A5 .T M. A -325 HIGH' STRENGTH BOLTS. WHERE INDICATED - ON THE DRAWINGS. SHALL BE ASSEMBLED AND THE - FASTENERS TIGHTENED' IN ACCORDANCE VA1H 'TURN_ -NUT' METHOD AS DESCRIBED 194 THE SPECIFICATION FOR S1RUCTURAL JOINTS USING A:ST.M. A -325 OR A= 490. BOLTS ( 11- 13 -85), UNLESS OTHERWISE . ' NOTED. ALL JOINTS WILL BE ASSEMBLED: WITHOUT 'WASHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.' •` - ALL STEEL MEMBERS EXCEPT BOLTS, FASTENERS AND 'CABLE ;SHALL RECEIVE' ONE SHOP COAT OF IRON OXIDE ' CORROSION NMBI1IVE PRIMER, 441111NG:THE PERFORMANCE REOUHREMENTSOF TTP -636. SHOP AND FIELD INSPECTIONS AND ASSOCIATED FEES ARE PIE. RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR- ONTRACTOR, UNLESS 'STIPULATED OTHERWISE IN THE CONTRACT. - ._ - METAWC BUILDING COMPANY WILL IDENTIFY•PRIMARY STRUCTURAL STEEL PATH -A• MINIMUM YIELD PONT • GREATER THAN 36,000 PSI BY MEANS OF A STICKER NEAR TI4E ERECTION MARK ON EACH SHIPPED PIECE. - SECONDARY .MEMBERS PATH A YIELD POINT. EQUAL: TO OR GREATER. THAN 33,000 PS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY. -- MEANS OF A STICKER NEAR- -THE ERECTION MARK ON EACH SHIPPED :PIECE. - `•(THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE'. TO THE 1997 UBC -SECTION 2203.'SUB- SECT1ON 2203.2 AND:2203.3) SAFETY' COMMITMENT. METAWC BUILDING COMPANY HAS A COMMITMENT TO':MANUFACTURE OIAUTY BUILDING. COMPONENTS THAT CAN BE ;SAFELY ERECTED. HOWEVER, THE SAFETY COMMITMENT AND JOB SITE' PRACTICES, OF THE ERECTOR ARE BEYOND .1141 CONTROL 01' METAWC BUILDING COMPANY. -' :IT :IS- .STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT SAFE' WORKING, CONDITIONS. AND ACODENT PREVENTION PRACTICES BE THE TOP LOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS SHOULD ALWAYS BE -FOLLOWED TO. HELP .INSURE WORKER SAFETY:` PY72(HOUSTON. TX)) •-... -MAKE' CERTAIN ALL EMPLOYEES KNOW THE SAFEST AND MOST PRODUCTIVE WAY OF ERECTING :A BUILDING: EMERGENCY PROCEDURES - SHOULD - BE KNOWN TO ALL EMPLOYEES.'.: - . • DAILY MEETINGS-HIGHUGHTING SAFETY PROCEDURES ARE .ALSO RECOMMENDED. -THE USE- OF- HARD HATS, RUBBER SOLE :SHOES- FOR. ROOF:WORK. PROPER EQUIPMENT ,FOR HANDLING MATERIAL AND SAFETY NETS WHERE APPLICABLE, THE FOLLOWING•CONDITIONS APPLY IN THE EVENT -THAT THESE DRAWINGS -ARE USED 'AS APPROVAL DRAWINGS"• . A) 41 IS U4PERAI1VE I1IAT ANY • CHANGES- 10 191151 DRAVNGS 9) BE MADE IN CONTRASTING INK. . - • • 3) HAVE ALL. INSTANCES CF CHANGE SLY INDICATED 2) BE LEGIBLE' AND UNAMBIGUOUS El) DATED SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED, ON ALL PAGES. • MANUFACTURER RESERVES •THE RIGHT TO RE- SUBMIT' DRAWINGS VAIN EXTENSIVE OR- REQUIRED - :.TO AVOID MISFABRICATION.•THIS MAY IMPACT THE DELIVERY SCHEDULE. • el) -APPROVAL OF THESE DRAWINGS INDICATES CONCLUSIVELY THAT METAWC'HA5 'CORRECTLY •.' :INTERPRETED THE • CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS, AND FURTHER CONSTITUTES AGREEMENT THAT THE BUILDING •AS . - ••`DRAWN,..OR-AS DRAWN• WITH' INDICATED .CHANGES - REPRESENTS: THE .TOTAL.-OF THE MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED • - BY MANUFACTURER. E) ANY CHANGES NOTED ON :THE DRAWINGS 'NOT.IN •CONFOM ANCE WTH :THE TERMS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT BETWEEN MANUFACTURER AND'IT5- CUSTOMER -991 NOT-BINDING ON: MANUFACTURER UNLESS 'SUBSEQUENTLY SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO IN • WRITING. BY, CHANGE'ORDER OR SEPARATE ' DOCUMENTATION.. MANUFACTURER :RECOGNIZES .114AT RUBBER STAMPS ARE ROUTINELY USED FOR INDICATING APPROVAL, DISAPPROVAL, REJECTION, • OR MERE- REVIEW OF'•THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. HOWEVER, - MANUFACTURER,:-': DOES NOT ACCEPT CHANGES' OR. ADDITIONS TO CONTRACTUAL TERMS -AND CONDITIONS -THAT MAY APPEAR WITN - -USE O•• A• STAMP OR SIMILAR- INDICA-RCN OF APPROVAL - DISAPPROVAL; ETC. SUCH LANGUAGE APPLIED. TO •• MANUFACTURER'S DRAWINGS -BY THE :CUSTOMER. AROIIIECT,-.ENGNEER: OR ANY OTHER`PARTY WILL BE . '.CONSIDERED AS - UNACCEPTABLE'ALTERATIONS -TO THESE' DRAWING: NOTES, AND WILL NOT . ALTER. THE : • •: CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS 'EXISTING BETWEEN 'MANUFACTURER :AND ITS. CUSTOMER: RAIN FALL 1NIENSITF.IS EQUAL TO 04 INDIES PER HOUR FOR A•5 MN.•DURATO (5 YEAR MEAN RECURRENCE)' RECEIVED OCT 0 9'2001 • COfk7Eiq:Ji',iub -y ' DEVELOPIVIERIT INDICATED AND APPUED AS- REQUIRED -BY • ' . 'BBC 1997 THIS EERTIFICA11ON- IS 14444110 TO THE. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF' THE FRAMING AND -COVERING PARTS: .MANUFACTURED BY THE BUILDING- MANUFACTURER AND AS SPECIFIED N TH1 CONTRACT. - ACCESSORY ITEMS SUCH AS •' • -. • DOORS. WINDOWS: LOUVERS, TRANSLUCENT PANELS, VENTILATORS ARE NOTTNCLUOED..ALSO EXCLUDED ARE OTHER. PARTS 'OF THE, PROJECT NOT PROVIDED. BY• THE. BUILDING MANUFACTURER - SUCH -AS 'FOUNDATIONS. - MASONRY WALLS, ••.• 'MECHANICAL EOUIPMENT AND THE ERECTION *940 IN1C190N .01' THE. BUILDING.. THE BUILDING' SHOULD BE• ERECTED ON A PROPERLY DESIGNED- FOUNDATION -IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BUILDING MANUFACTURERS DESIGN.IIANUAL••.THE. ATTACHED DRAWINGS: AND GOOD. ERECTION'. PRACTICES. THE CONTRACTOR AND /OR ENGINEER :OF RECORD .IS, TO•CONFIRM THAT - 'THESE LOADS COMPLY WITH REQUIRETENTS OF 1941 LOCAL -BUILDING DEPT. • • -ROOF DEAD LOAD ' • • .25 - -PSF ( FOR ROOF PANELS AND `PURLINS•)_' COLLATERAL DEAD LOAD 5.0 PSF •. RO0F LIVE LOAM .••PRIMARY - FRAMING. 25.0 - PSF : : SECONDARY FRAMING. 25.0.. PSF AUXILIARY OVE LOAD:.:" - • 'PSF • _ GROUND SNOW. LOAD • • •( Ce ° - ROOF SNOW. LOAD ;.. 25 0 : PSF. .. - WIND LOAD - `800 'NPR, EXPOSURE - SEISMIC. - ZONES -_ • ; IMPORTANCE :FACTORS SNOW `LOAD.. SEISMIC : LOAD • Seismic' HMard -EAposRe Gary Seismic Cal6gay •. Ste Caelficed CA4.36 - . Basic Structure! System Cud Tiers Nilh ardnmy 1.0 - .: moment Verses of steel e mxe bicdh braced francs LO Respame Moefealke Fated (R) 4.5 FOR MOMENT FRLI 1_0 • - '.5.6 FOR 0- BRACING' . Deflection 'MEZZANINE LOADS - : Md7sis. Proce4a dld e - EQed lateral Face UVE.•LOAD - N /A' - PSF. :.DEAD LOAD' 'N /A : PSF SPECIAL LOADS. (2) 36508 RT.U. lc (2) 1,9501 R.T.U. DRAWING INDEX 0011. CONY 94ET 115. 94ETS - .'ROSE I DENES THAT ARE APPl1CABtf• (4aLOED N BACK O'PAOUMF):., (1 01 2 AMYCR BOLT RAN 12 o12: ' BASE R DONS AND REACBO1 • f1 el 12 cord TRAM PU44 E2 e112 • SLOW FROM :1 .E3 of 11 E4of 12 • A • 6 a112 D(WL E*EYA1R15 :. E6 d'12 E1012 .. rAME 62105 mob . EA at 12 -ERNE OW5S YCD01 • Es 0.12 • MAZE CROSS SLCIDII: - E10 d 12 FRAME moss SECRd , ' ,E11 o1 12 FRAME 1.1055 544194 (12 of T2 GNIRAI OTITIS 6 1 1 5 0 . 8 - 54 A - 64 165) ; Idb .661 669' 61 .166 •1660 : -RSHg 190 Il9L .610 116101 :;199 1611 198- 601 oil 1919.® Rico& .6N' 1641 6B - 62J .:'6101 6109 .611 1621A .6218. 1E)IJ •694: 615: 626 lai9. 697 16260 '611 • 627A 1629 • 629 768 :.6TI ' -' 6Q - 613 ; 634 :Ia. - 6B .1657:' 168 :169 1SW 1691. 1642 643: ' 644 6446 166 -1646 .11547 .60' 649. 630 • 1651 1152 TWA 651. 654:: 11S55 ..-115 651 658. REA 658. 16i9A .:: (j 1E61 i(M) 6518 1910 ..BSA 1662E 661E 662G "of 6619 662K- 1661E 66244 oar 663 WO 1668' -156X 11358 "184 1655. S U '15593 NW 1611 :' 611 •613 614 -65 676 :1671 1618 : - I6A ,C 192 • '681 C-)1 684A MEG : u 1150 ` 1:81. 610 .1984. :6111 .19144 1612 MA 1693 6931- ,169416918 1695 6105 6105A 6ffe.ISO 6101A.618:-11831'.609 61091 61121 6113 1601 1114 '19140 1605'6116 16111 .V18.'.619 .16720 -6111 on. 613 604 1618 1626 62 A .:.. 51 of 2 " SWARD DETAS ' S1 of./ - . -SIAIAM PAWL DET*S - n of I , STA10N61 IMMO DEALS . NOT M OMER O ACURD6 FOR TIE 019111 PRUECI. • 12 . EXPIRES 1023.03 DRAWING STATUS FOR APPROVAL .THESE DRAWINGS. BOG FOR APPROVAL, - • •ARE BY DEMOTION NOT RNAL,.AND ARE FLIT CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION u.: THEIR PURPOSE.IS TO CONFUOI•PROPER NIERPRETA11040F 4E FR0..ECT. 000WEN15,-1O1 DRANNGS ISSUED -FOR CONSTRUC110N7 CAN BE THESE DRAWNCS, BEING FOR POaUT, ARE BY OEFka110N NOT FINAL N THAT, AS A 1@IMLk4 PIECE MAMONCS-ARE NOT OEU4FBD. 01EY . DRAWINGS ISSUED FOR CD•4S11WC110N • CAN BE CON50[RED AS •o FINAL ORATNNCS N0. DATE • dualism . B1 A 08/28/01 • FOR PERVJT k APPROVAL 6 HS 09/18/01 REVEED FOR PERIOT k APPROVAL. NE metallic builjin9 company 7301 FANSEW • 49413)04, 'DAIS •PO. BN 40376 DP 7741 . (213) 494 -7208 ; -BP 77240 9:1 BUILDING csanDis SHEET C1 O610ER SEA CON ID1AT0N TUK99.A WA • DIN. BE 4X0 Br • .:ODE • GEOR(£ HEISER BODY CO tl01R . NS 96E1 NO • 6311[ • C1all. 8 SOME NONE • x010. ' 0805. 195789 •FH AB 200'-O 0/0 STEEL BLDG. 'A' - 25' -0" 25'-0 ' -3 23' -9 25'-0 23' -9 BRACED BAY 9' -0t 1 :1:61 6'-4S 18' -7i 23' -71 106' -6 "52' -8 0/0 STEEL: BLDG. 'B' 40' -10 200' -0'0/0 STEEL BLDG, 'A' ANCHOR BOLT 'SETTING PLAN O DENOTES FRAMED OPENING (SEE SHT. F2)' RECEIVED OCT::;0 9 2009 DEV o NNT PIRES 10,2310 ANCHOR BOLT DIAMETERS HAVE BEEN-DESIGNED BY DIE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER BASED ON RISC METHOD'WITH,COMBINED ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION PROJ DEVELOPMENT; EMBEDMENT AND HOCK LENGTH OF ANCHOR BOLTS, IN THE CONCRETE ARE DESIGN RESF'ONSIBIUTY OF OTHERS ALSO - DESIGN OF SHEAR ANGLES, .TENSION PLATES, HAIRPINS, AND: 'ANY; OTNER EMBEDDED MATERIAL 8 THE:CONCRETE SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PROVIDED BY OTHERS NOTE ANCHOR BOLI PROJECTION IS FROM .BOTTCH OF BASE PLATE ANCHOR BOLT: BOTTOM' OF BASE. PLATE DRAWING STATUS li DESE- DRAWINGS, BEING FOR APPROVAL; ARE BY DEFINITION NOT -FINAL, AND ARE •F R CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTARCN ONLY. THER 2. PURPOSES TO CONFIRM PROPER Il1ERPRETATlON OP THE PROJECT ..D000ENTS ONLY DRAIN= ISSUED "FOR' CONSTRUCTION" CAN BE A 08/28/01 FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL •1' 1 Y. — UIESE DRAWINGS BONG FOR PERMIT..ARE.BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL - 41 THAT, AS A MNIYUI • PIECE- MARKINGS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED; ONLY .0 - ::RAeNGS ISSUED ". FOR CDNSTRUC1O " CAN.BE CONSIDERED AS ANCHOR BOLTS BY OTHERS DExraroaN'•ANCHOR BOLT PLAN ma SEE BUILDING DESORPTION SHEET CI moo SEA CON MTDN NKW A. WA EN. BY OCDBY. .DUE SOLE NONE ma NO. 0805- 195789 91E110. F1of2 • SEE ANCHOR ',BOLT PLAN SIDEWALI 1 BOLT. RUN ' BP -01 BP -02 A, BOLTS i•o 1 BASE t THK. 'I BP -04 BP =06. BASE PLATE' DETAIL A BOLTS i • 1 BASE t;THK. '2• BP -07: 1 4RA64EU OPENING WIDTH 14'-0 9 16' -0 S -4 1 r -2 8 R • OR DOOR (Bf OfIIETS) 4 x !A•K DOOR (BY 01(815) BASE -PLATE DETAILS OPEN.WALL`SECTIUN SEC. 8 A. BOLTS '1 -e I BASE E THK WIv Name Radii= at lives 1 mA 9. - Wb !Mae 1d.. .5 loe. E Wad 3 his ?Same BeacU. at Wes 41X96 11.- . Q1001! - � ROTC - "' .191'0. A I mvtl® art ino n [pt EC A Al 6460 n boa a Kps C A N =ban at ahm v o [pt C :' A nepvne vdvC oQmle I A mpbe ware, Warta . _ Q A MWfne Me. 04616 apOmle 440!6 - � gpo9lt 4FxNm - . _ , ypmle SaKOm .. . kmt ST • " =894 59 ' . � � Fred 4 Bad A' .���" Y�mi , -- Ym . - -�� Moro • cm�iw ..CtN 9. -6s lam Camellia 6944 _ 9eT 992 I. F4N@b 6104 gee • Par gam (630 + 170 1190 A - "3290_. 11X9 0000 9140 i IAE 1090 5" 64109 21.097 005 (630 i IAC 10 0 5 42.714 72161 01100 me + 119E 1090 E 21756 -11]9 005 OL10 4 UYE 1090 '- E- 21031 -21.092 -40:13 1EAO + 1M 1010 E 41.186 -22664 005 91 4 911 ' 4-,..-12.703:7144 0990 01. u 5 -2745 -usm 010) 91 . eu A -52920 -1u49 905 0. + 92 - E -2709 -0.547 005 0. + u - F -6.25 -0110`.' 0.05 0. . 111 :.. "- C - -5967 -9057 010 91 405 . "... "A 44'242...2556' :0000 0. +.419 A -2148 4311 005 0. 4 911" 4 -501 , 470 050 0.+915 " E -: -5169 .8.914 050 91 +I5 E - 1199.:17.35 050 91.92 . E .- 1191'17410 0.000 9'+9/211.4911; A 1.393 -" -2261 011591+1/21,!1 �. A" 0515- 5.15 0059 .9/31.4911. - 'A• 1.185 -4.610 005 91 + 1/711 + 911 1776 -5401 0fID3 0. + 1/31. 91. .. - E. 180 -1523 005 91. 1/211 + 911 E (1M =11.02 005 91 + 7/flLL +" LL A .21591. 6636 0.091 O2.'+ 7/01 + 11 .. 4 165929' 12164 005 91 . 1/091 + 91 A 11695 14919 050 91 + 1/251 + 01 - . • F . 91.75 -10781 005 01: +.9/281 + 01 . ' E - 32492 -20112 " 0.05 91 . 1/2911 + (1 + F . 34.181 -21.906 050 0.4 9/299 + 911 - -�5 . 12951 1.410 0.50 0. 4 "7/291. ill.: A 25027. -11513 050 91 .' 9/211 + -9 A 11195 91359 005 1414 1/211+ 911 E 2116 4060 085 1.4.-.4 7/31. 9115 - E 4.942 _ • 1151 005 0. +.9/291 4'9115 0 _ :5196 - :7055 005 0. ..1/2118 411 'A, 29.723 15.786 050 0. + 1/789 4 (1, ' = , A 21947 0000 91 + 7/2919 411 A 36261 21531 005 91+7/MR+11 ""6 .11.91 45100591 +'7 /2918+9. E. 79.627- 11.01.:00591 +7/692+1 -E' 31.1P= 12668 005 91 • C0.1 + 05 A 9927 " 210 005 9` +.0081 + 91 - A '16999. 1428 050 0... 001 4.91 • * 90204 '..3795 005 91 • C01 402. . E 7345 -405 :120:0 64-4 025 + $- C - :73351 -1.426 0000 91 • COL 405 E'. 11847: -7264 005 • • • • • • • (1) LM L', • • lD0kH =1. Y c 9.71 319HC:H =5.41. (I) E !Mk H = ARK' r lQ1 SEISHIC REACTIONS" SHOWN HAVE NOT BEEN BCREASED BY/1.= 2.2 • BRACING REACTIONS • E.W. COL. "REACTIONS at LINES _'•1 & 9 '11 ✓Nl .H •5.3K tqa' 7 1.5 MOF� EtViVi REACTIONS ExPIRES ' • DRAWING STATUS 1X9.$1 414-11940' 19999405.• "0.R+C FOR APPROVAL' ARE BY 0(71NITIIM NOT FNAL. AND ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL• REPRESENT4110R (34L5. DER PURPOSE 6 70 CONRR9 PROPER' 1NYERPRETA 1110 d l/9. PRO.EC1 000.21(079. OILY.DRASMCS ISSUED 'TOR CONSTROC1o2' -CAN BE A 08/28/01 FUR PERMIT d APPROVAL BY «D T metallic building company R$' ''� ,1 �,1� � � - ..130 FILET • RO5TO{ 222+3 • 70. BOX 40338, • _ :: . . - 7ro 77011 QU1 466 -7788 . " 80 640 rearm BASE t DETAILS / REACTIONS U THESE'DRAW/ICS:10NO FORPER161, ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL N THAT, AS A N2491µ PIECE MARKINGS ARE NO1 0281820 ONLY ORA5NC5 ISSUED +OR OONSTRUC EN CAN BE CONSOCRED-AS oawEE OFOR C 5+1574:TKf4 4TNU DRA91NC5 9.2E SEE BUILDING CESCRPTION SHEET CI tOW1101 TUKWLA, WA GEORGE HEM BODY CO X510. • 0805- 195789 F2of2, 1. ROOF FRAMING BOLTS AUX O1Y ..comma .. - .5I ..A'. PURIM LAP BOLTS V OA A f.68. B. ARIA TO FRAME 4 073. f 633. C SRU1 fURS4 BOLTS - 4-BIA.. 1-.1E. FAZE STRUT BOLTS -4 OA. , P 643. 208-0 0/0 s1EEi 907 • 25• -0 25 -0 - . 25-0 25-0 . .25-0 23-0 -3 • 27 -9 PUAN UP 7 -5; 8E514 7 -51 5 6714 IMP. ON 7 -51 ':- .7 -51, 2 -5; 1-5I _ .:, 2 -51 27-0 . 27-9 • • 1' -3 I= -- EXISTING BLDG. - --- - - - -- - ------ - 1 8511 0314 0314 51 871 8114 1 I 8214 87714 1YP. 1 8113 1w. 1 1 1 :.1 1 1 1 OBA6 6716 1816 •13-6 TAD V. AMINO s \: '. 1f -10 • ,• It CAM 1844 :...9' -4 zz' -74 68718 NAB • ;'4 CABE - 5. . . c1=1111. .. -. ;•4 cAac ___ Nad8 i 8612 0612 8213 :13. 6713 6773 8713 6713 2Y -9 25 -0 25 -0 50-4 WEPT N 5-0 5-0 5-0 5-o j' s-0 11 1210- I19i0U16 5-0 0.0 (7YP.'ALL BATS) 11 56' -2 11212 10712 :10ffi2 n' 2W.11 2-53 I ' 6 .614 2 11 n 2 .1 .. 1 11 n 0712 ('11' 11 5-0 .10612 9 -0'' 5 -0 : :, 5-0 7- 6z -1C, 541 ' .5-0 9-0 5-0 7 -47 57 -a op MR 0.76..1 -• 40•-ID : 601E FIDIWL BEYATIN -. 0 8107 If NOT saaw': ROOF FRAMING PLAN •5 001015 6744 SUN 861096 r (4) A307 EA. END a waaa5 0 9 -0,0/C. O A11..00101I O6 PUBIS TO YAWN • 11105 AT 806.9' 10 BE BY MRS: • .. . �$ g RECEIVE OCT p 9 2QD1. DEVE`ESAVIZT. 110 11185970 rs NOT IRE 010008 a. KEC117 • '.. FON TIE:7191ALL PROEC1. • XPIRES MSCELLVECUSACCENOES Fausso mesas 19/7 ATORS. NQ 67 MC N0. SIZE D50iPDOl - 604 OISRIPIION DRAWING STATUS 67 3'-0 ,'3-0 WIRES .. - N/A a 16' -0' OIL DOER(BT:ODERS). N/A 2 -4 x1-2 - .84417 DDOR (BY opus) :. YIC 440: .OESCRP1101 .. N/A . • l FULL CUTER TRY a- DOABLE 1E01 .. 661 NQ DESORPTION • 8/0 THESE ORANRGS. ,BEING FOR 'APPROVAL, ARE BY-DEFINITION NOT :FN4AL AND-APE FOR CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY. : ;THEIR,. PURPOSE IS TO. CONFIRM PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE PROJECT OODAENT5. ONLY DRAWINGS ISSUED 'FOR.CONS1RUCTION`- CAN BE THESE. ORANINCS.. BEANO FOR PERMIT, ARE. BYDEFROTDN NOT F01A1 . 64 THAT. AS A Mo1AaAl MEOE •MARKINGS ARE NOT. DEN116177 ON1Y DRA18877 .155000 ". FOR CONSTRUCTION 7 CAN BE CONSIDERED AS • .ri:808 CON5tRUCDUt DAIS OESCRP110N BY OO A 08/28/01 FOR PERIOT & APPROVAL AS EIS flutelike building company . '.7301 FANYEW • 77.377 N. ,17743 • P.O. 8011 47338 IP 77041. (713) 4611 -7798 IP' 77240,, 05f101101 'ROOF FRAARNC PLAN sa ' SEE BUILDING DESORPTION SHEET CI woo ' SEA CON COKE HEISER Boor CO LocAum. ' TUKWILA, WA .001. 80 . CICD BY ' DALE CARD NS SCALE, NONE AB N7 0805- 195789 RI 3387 AB BEET 447. El of 12 ISSUE h 0 81512 8612' 8212 (DP.) 8E514' 8614 8614 8614 8E514 8614 :••\ .8Z12 (TYP.)- i 8212 (TYP.) • '8212 (TYP.)' 0 8Z16 •E USE (4) BOLT LONG CLIP (11P. U.N ) • A.— O CABLE 1 :. F06511 F100R:.,- FORDO BASE TRIM 23' -9 25'-0 25-0 25 -0 25-8 •6•-6 • 8212 18' -6 23' -6 15 -10 1' -6 25-0 25' -0 • 23' -9 • 25-0 200' -0 .0 /0: STEEL 8E514 8614 8ES14 SIDEWALL FRAMING AT LINE A 'B` DENOTE (2) BOLT SHORT CUP 8116 (TYP ) x -3 8614 8ES14 NOTE: 1. FIELD SLOT GIRTS AS REOUIRED:FOR CABLE, TO PASS THROUGH. • 2 '13' DENOTES (2) BOLT SHORT CLIP`. • 8614 8614 I I I I W12x16 SPANDREL•BEAM (T1'P)_ 1:FIANCE.BRACES 41 5-0,8.C. U 8116 OPEN FOR 23' -9 • 9' -2 l 15, -10 25-0 ,--•113x34 11 (3) I'4 A325N- ' 25 A- -43x31 t' (3) 1.0 A325N -, • •.31T'tEADC .\ 25-0 25-0 9. -4 15-8 25-0 • 25-0 25-0 23' -9 25-0 200' -0 .0 /0 STEEL QTY SIZE • 8 14•d6 0x DOOR 4 3' -117 -2 MNI DC JAMB ( +3) HEADER ( +4) 9LL ('+4) IAMB COVER HEAD COVER SIDEWALL FRAMING BOLTS MNa( on A GIRT IM BOLTS 4' BA I 1® GIRT TO FRAAE 4'DA. s i' Ma • SIDEWALL FRAMING AT .LINE E. OCT O 9 2C01 ®PZr�uwo tr ' . ®E9/ELOF ME. E.NT NOTE nu ENIa IJW90tD IS N4 THE IEED a 11 O 119[ 01ENALL -P*0 LCI C1 DRAWING STATUS THEE DRAINGS - BEING FOR' APPROVAL.. ARE.BY DEFINITION NOT FNAL"AND -ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL• REPRESENTA110N ONLY. `. 1HEIR "PURPOSE S TO CONFIRM .PROPER- NIERPRETA11G1 OF. THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS ONTY. ORAMNGS ISSUED 'FOR.CONS1RUCTIOM CAN BE roR Pexum. THESE DRA11N05, BEING FCR•PEWOT, ARE BY DEFINITION NO1 FINAL AN THAT, AS A MINIMA( PIECE MARKINGS ARE.NOT 10ENTFIED ONLY . • .ORAMNfS ' ISSED:' FOR CCNSIRUCIION, "'CAN BE.0 ISIDERED AS FOR I:V.1CTNl- FNU�CRAMW6- N0. DATE BY 0FD 08/28/01 FOR PDOBT & APPROVAL 16 RES 8 09/18/01 RDASED FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL NE 11.0 metallic building company ..1101 FADPEM • x0115[01( moo • Pa WI 10338 DESa4>'1oi 9DEWALL FRAMNG PLAN ) SIE SEE BUILDING DESCRIPTION SHEET CI 0510009 SEA CON mow ..TUKMU, WA DRL B1 CIFD RI DUE 0ORGE HEISER BODY OD. SOLE NONE 118 W. - 0805-195289 R1 1* a) NS BEET 110. ISLE E2of12 B 4'- 0.WALLIrES (TYP. EAN.) 106' -6 42' -0 51' -6 SIDEWALL SHEETING AT LINE .A 100' -2 ,SIDEWALL 'SHEETING AT-LINE E OCT O S 2001 COMMON :TY. DEVELOPMENT .. XPIRES 1023:03 " JAMB (• +3"). HEADER (• +4D SILL ('+4) .. SIDEWALL FRAMING BOLTS 1416' O.H. DOOR S- 417 -2 WOMB GRT UP BOLTS GR1 TO FRAME DRAWING STATUS THESE DRAWINGS, BEING FOR APPROVAL. ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL. AND ARE Fat CNICEPSUAL REPRESENTATION CHLY. THEIR PURPOSE ' 6 TO CONFIRM PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. ONLY DRAWINGS ISSUED -FOR CONSTRUCTION" CAN BE " 08/28/01. 09/18/01 ' FOR POUT '& APPROVAL REMO FOR PERM & APPROVAL. 7301 FARMEY • HOUSTIN, RYAS • P.O. 80% 40338 '. . 7➢ 77011 (713) 166 -7708 ': IP 77240 THESE DRAMRICS, BEND FCR PERMIT, ARE BY DEFINII1CN•1401 FINAL' • N THAT, AS A IRIMAI, -PIECE MARKINGS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED ' ONLY DRAWINGS 'ISSUED - FOR CONSTRUCTION -.CAN BE CONSIDERED. AS .0 :�: C011PlETE.'. FOR CO STRUC8ION: FINAL ORAW01G5.. - SEE BUDDING DESCRIPTION SHEET CI 778 NO 0605- 195789: (3 of 12. W12x16 SPANDREL BEAM 10512 10512 (2)x•6 A325N • 7 s'.t CONC :WALL (BY OTHERS) SPANDREL BEAM CONN. DETAIL YIF' SPANDREL BEAM COLUMN .W1/116 SPANDREL BEAM 52' -8 0/0 STEEL 8106. "B' ANCHORS. 5-0 0C. (BY OTHERS) SIDEWALL FRAMING AT LINE `Z t2.0 A325 �1tAS01FRY-WAIL- (Bf 011E5) CONC. WALL' (BY OTHERS) 2' -0 UP SPANDREL BEAM CONN. DETAIL 1VF SPANDREL BEWI 9 FLG. BRACE 52'8 0/0 STEEL BLDG. 8' . SIDEWALL SHEETING ''AT' LINE Z._ DRAWING STATUS RECEOVED OCT O 9 2601. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _. THESE DRAWINGS. BEING FOR APPROVAL... ARE BY (8081om NOT TINA.. AND ARE FOR .CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY. THEIR 71404004 6 TO CONFRN PRGPER•NIEPPRETANON OF THE PR0.CCT.. DOCUMENTS ONLY DRAWINGS CSSUED -FOR CONSIRUCTWIi' CAN BE:' .- CONSmERED AS COMPIETE . -THESE CRAVINGS BEN0 FOR PERMIT. ARE BY DEFINITION N07 FINAL IN THAT. AS A MNU&A& PIECE MARKINGS ARE N07;117EN18IED ONLY DRAWINGS 69UED - FOF.0 4S1RUC1U4 -.CAN BE 0 19DERED AS, A 08/28/01 8 09/18/01 FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL REVISED FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL EXPIRES metallic builclin9 company, 7301 MIEN • N0USTOL MS • P.O BO 1031E 18 77041 Q13) 460 -77EE 08 71240 .. DE5CRPI114 SIDEWAEL ELEVATIONS o SEE - BUILDING DESCRIPTION SHEET 9 10811011 -.- .TUKWRA :WA 801 81 OCD 8T - .OBE. 584E NONE AB ND 0805- 195789 • E4 of 11 8216 8712 8x3.5016' 8 5C16 O n U _ - 8216 8112 16� 8x3.5C16' ! . 8x3.15016 0 ri O FlN19i FLOOR A --1_8116 8716 8716 8212 Bx3.5C16' 8x3.5C16 n n: Ci 8216 8216 PI 0 0 n • 82$ 8716. n=a 6216. -.10212 - 1 1 I 10x3 5016' 1 .5C16 1 '1 87161 j. I I e r FORMED BASE TRIM 8716 1 -TAI 1 6ll�j -6 0 J404'1. 14.-0 1111{11 ` 19'-6 20' -6 14 -0 18' -6 4., 5-6 1 • 14' -0 ( 1' -0 26' -6 85 -0 0/0 STEEL 2' -0 LAP, 11 ENDWALL 'FRAMING AT 'LINE 1 "65'-o 0/0 Shit - 15-0 CANOPY ' 0 U W N 1 • :1 b ~ I ^18716 • I I,' U O ♦-- I 1 1 1 8716 ▪ 1111 EP891 FLOOR • II .12 ONE _ _ _ - r _1- -- --- - - -8216 -'10Z12 10x3.5016' 10x3.5C16 r- 14' -0 n u01 0 8716 8712 8x3.5C16' 8x3.5C16 CO 8216 8216 26' -6 5•-6 ' -E 0 14'-0 8216 87)2 1 8x3.5016'. 8x3.5C16 871 8216 8Z16�' —M FORMED BASE BASE 20' -6 4' -0 4' -0 14' -0 19' -6 n 0 1' -6- 6 8712 8x3.5016' 843.506 14'-0 18' -6 0 3' -D. 85• -0 0/0 STEEL NOTES- . 1 'USE (2) BOLT SNORT alp 0 7 -4 & 13' -4 GIRLS 2.. USE (4) 80LT LONG CUP: 019' -4 & 25 - 4'GIRTS 3`' FIELD LOCATE • ENDWALL SHEETING AT LINE' 1 • ENDWALI. FRAMING BOLTS was OTT =RPM A CART LAP BELTS • 4' DIA. x 1' y8 - 8 - : 4ARI 10 FRAE - 4' 01A x 1' 118 • • c' WI. TO RAFT. V ILA. x 1L'.A325 STS D RAFT. TO RAFT . V DIA x II' A325 a15 • ENDWALL: FRAMING AT LINE 9 12 ONE(- 7 -0 LAP 1:1 85 -0 0/0 STEEL OCT 09 2001 DEVELOPMENT . ENDWALL SHEETING AT LINE' 9 ttal DIE UINER308 0 . • NOT DIE DOPER OF RECORD NI 11E MYENAII PROM . AqU IM OTY LOCATION', DESCRIPTION DRAWING STATUS cot,/ RAF.; .. 5/8' DIA 0 1 l/2' A325-130115 Valli YAMS 13 FOR AFPROVAL THEY WUNIGS. BEM FOR APPROVAL ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL AND 'ARE FOR. CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION GARY: TOR PURPOSE IS TO CONFIRM PROPER. INTERPRETATION OF WE PROXE1 .. DOCWENTS QTLY DRAWINGS ISSUED :OR -c ot9TRUCnor CAN BE 13 CONSIDERED AS C1IIPETE -. - F101 ____ : .. , THESE DRAWINGS.. DUNG FOR PERMT ARE BY DEFUTON NOT FINAL • U4 THAT. AS -A 104PAAE PECE.MARDNGS ARE NOT DENfiED. ONLY. ; DRAWINGS . ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CAN BE Ctrl10(RED AS . CONPLEIE . ❑FOR rxx4sltUC:1NIr FINAL DRAWINGS DAZE - IO:SDiPI1ON. . Br 0T8 A 08/28/01 FOR PERMIT @ APPROVAL NS RES metciIlic builJin9.compery .: 7301 FMETI • HOUSTON TEXAS • PO. 800 40= _ 2P 77041 ":: (71]) 466 -7709 • IP 77240. d . RS10D04' - ENDWALL ELEVATIONS , 4E SEE BUILDING EIESCRPDON SWEET CI 0S5OER SEA CON LocA • IUKWILA, WA ORR BY.- 04081 DATE GEORGE NEISER BODY CO. GAD Br NS SERE NONE .OB NO . 0805- 195789 - A,8 51*E1110, E5 of 12 641E A 85-3k 5 Ok 5' -OTu 64 0-0) 8Cn (20'4 (20'-0) 64:04 BGa (2f1-Q) 6-4 (20' -0) 6„ (20 -0) • FLANGE MACE ORE SIDE OF FRAM: ON FINISH F1.03R S -61 77'-2 HAUNCH TO- HAUNCH CTEARANCE 16'-0 CANOPY 85' -0 0/0 STEEL 4.L3( -FRAME CROSS: SECTION AT 'LINE_' 1 -807L 8i U¢fA90d8 IS 81T ENE n+� a �cae NR.Dt OVERALL PIO.EC1. NOTE: USE . (1) HARDENED WASHER ' PER EACH A325 BOLT EXPIRES 10123103 KNEE CONNECTION DETAL e31 INTERMEDIATE CONNECTION DETAIL KNEE CONNECTION DETAIL. HIGH SR DRAWING STATUS FOR APPROVAL THESE DRAWINGS. 'IONIC FOR' APPROVAL, • ARE -BY DEFINITION NOT ANAL 'AND ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION MAY: -THEIR • PURPOSE IS TO•EONfDM: PROPER A 11E 'RETA1ON.a TIE:PROJEC1 • DOCUMENTS. -OAT DRAMRIGS ISSUED -FOR CONSTRUCDON"f CAN RE • 1HESE. ORAWINCS.• BEING FOR'PER44T, ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL . W' 1NAT. AS A,80411411& 180 £ MARIONGS ARE - NOT IDENTIFIED. ONLY. :.. DRAMNOS, ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION CAN &.D( AS • OFOR fN AWICS. FINAL ORAWNLS. NO DATE 08/28/01 OESCR PTION ' FCR.PERWT'It APPROVAL' :'.. BY NS cob RES metallic building company 7301 TAAIMOI •!MUSICµ TOGS • Pa EON 40338 .. 2P 77041 (713) 166 - 7188 :.. 2P 77280 '. . MESwP0u4 FRAME CROS5 SECTION 972 SEE BUILDING DESORPTION SHEET CI EUSTMIER • SEA CON LO DON ..TUKKA, WA. 081 BY Oro DT e„ GEORGE HEISER 800Y CO. NONE 0805- 195789 F" EAD4SL CAD BT :.. Ns SHEET NO. . E6 of 12: A. 12 ONE F 8x t (20" -0) 5,_O pa Bx1t (200 -0) (20'-0) 85 -3t6 5-0∎, S -(14 5 -Dt 5 %4 (20'_0)'. a i (20' -0) 8x36 (20 "-0) 8x a (20'-0) '24,060031-1.01( PANEL 24Ga UWBIE'lpC PANa FLANGE BRACE 80111 SOES OF: FRAME F00SH R00R 77' -1 s' HAUNCH -TO HAUNCH CLEARANCE - 16' -0 CANOPY 85' =0 0/0 STEEL FRAME- CROSS SECTION AT LINES" 2 & ., `Nom: THE IDM9Q5p 6 NOTE ROW a W000 Fa DE OVERALL PROSE ba OCT p.8 2001,; DEVELOPM NT.. 'NOTE: :USE (1) HARDENED WASHER PER EACH A325 BOLT KNEE .CONNEC11ON DETAL KNEE SECTION DE TAIL. HCI.SDE . . DRAWING STATUS ®FOR APPROVAL THESE DRAWINGS. ' BEING FOR APPROVAL,' ARE BY DEFINIBON 7107 FINAL, AND ARE Fat CONCEPTOAL'REPRESENfA110N OMIT . NEIR PURPOY 5 TO CON1084 PROPER RIIENPRETAl101 OF .14E PROJECT .DOCUMENTS ONLY DRARINGS.1SSJED "FCR:CONSTRUCBON" CAN BE MU M& • • TNESE DRAYANCS, BEING FOR PEF001,.'ARE B7 DEFINITION NOT 791AL ' N THAT, AS A M171104 PIECE MARKINGS ARE' NOT OENI9IED. ONLY ORARING5 -ISSUED " PM CONSINUCTKIN " CAN BE Ca150>CRED AS . fXI1mlFTE' OFat COHSIPIKII I- FEUL•ENAWNGS N0. A- 08/28/01 FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL NS aro TES a5Ot00M ' FRAME CROSS SEC80N • metallic building compen -. T.UtbAR1F1•. KOs.. .IEXAi . Oa BOX 10536 ID 77041 :. (713).466 -77GB :BP 77210 SEE 81.1811ING DESCRPRON SHEET C1 One ' SEA CON =go . .TUNWLA WA OM BY • NONE 0805- 195789, ;., GEORGE HE15ER BODY 00. PH F11G OCSE A,8 CM? BY NS 91E7 NO E7 of 12':: 651E 12 5 -01G 5 -4 5-0? • 5 -a 5-a 5 5 -0k Bx12 (20' -0) -- 5,4 B.17(26-0) ea', (20 -0) (20 -0) (20' -0) k (21-0 8x 6 (26-0) 24 -211 8x36 (20 -0) 6'- 101.:. 1}' -10j 2400 '001181.E_lq(' PANEL ?Aft UW81E- IOKPANEI ' 1/8118 SUPPORT BEAN. RANGE BRACE BO18 9DES Of FRAME 85 -0 0/0 STEEL FRAME CROSS SECTION AT LINE 4 NOTE: USE (1) HARDENED :WASHER PER EACH A325 BOLT - EXPIRES • Imam DRAWING STATUS THESE DRAPTNOS. BEING FOR. APPROVAL, ARE BY DEFINIRON NOT . FINAL AND ARE FCR CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION CHIT TOR PURPOSE 6 TO COIRRN.PROPER. INTERPRETATION OF 1ME•PROJECT • DOgOIENIS. ONLY DRAYANGS ISSUED -'FOR CONSTRUCOON".CAN -BE : CONSIDERED AS CUYPIETE. Mina. TNESE.DRAYANCS. BONG FOR PERMIT. ARE.BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL PI THAT, AS A 11INAAPA PIECE MARKINGS ARE•N0T IDENTIFIED. ONLY DRATANCS IS9JED -FOR CONSTRUCTION CAN BE CONSIDERED AS 08/28/01. FOR PER10T 8 APPROVAL metallic buildieag compern 09/18/01 . CROSS SEC11ON sit • SEE 81AWDING OESCRP110N SHEET CI 0805- 195789 E8 of 12 ,ONES 5' -03N • 85-734 5 07c ; 5'701i 5• -070: 41 5-0( 5 0K 54 Ws (20'4 it (20 -0) - 8x'2420 —0) (20'-0) 8x4 (20' -0) (20'-0) B*s (20-0). 2A'-2i 8'-2k 118218 9IPPORT BEAM (A0 LPL 5 ONLY)- 77l3, HAUNCII. TO HAUNCH CLEARANCE 83 -0 0/0 SiEEL FRAME CROSS SECTION AT LINES 5, " 7, & 8 OCT 08„ oev NOTE ry - USE (1) HARDENED WASHER PER EACH A325 BOLT. N0 lE INW19(MO 6 NOT BE MEER CY RECORD - FOR IE OVERALL PROICT. Iffd DRAWING STATUS • THESE DRANINCS. 'ECM FOR-APPROVAL •ARE 'BY DEFINIRC1•NOT FETAL. AID ARE FOR CORCEPTUAL REPRESENTA11tN ONLY.. TITER PURPOSE S TO.CCNITRII PROPER INTERPRETA110N. of TIE.PRQECI :" DOCUMENTS. ONLY DRAMIICS' ISSUED 'FOR CON91RUCTION" CAN BE ND. DATE A . 08/28/01 B . 09/18/01 • DESCRPIBN FOR PERMIT .& APPROVAL 16 REWSE0 FOR POUT & APPROVAL 1E OFD RES metallic buildii9 company '•733, FABEEI! • HECSTa, TEXAS • P.0 eoa 10338. =xPn:rs _ IC,3"t* BAD . 1NESE ORAKINGS, BEING FOR PEJR4IT, ARE By DEFDITKJN NOT FINAL R 1HA1; AS A IONUEAA, PIECE MARKINGS ARE NOT'OEN11FED. ONLY. .•ORARNCS- ISSUED " ;Fdt. CCNSTRUC1ON " CAN BE CONSOERTD AS . OFOR CONSTRUCTION;,' FNAL ORAwWGS 911 - CUSHIER FRAME CR06S SEC11011 SEE BUILDING DESCRPDON SHEET CI SEA CON GEORLE HEISER BODY CO CAD BY NS RI, 9DG SC BHT 111 ISSUE A,B E9 of 11 :1 13 war TUKIAIA, 89 Litt BY OM BT DAB NONE 0805- 195189 5' Oxu 5 -°" 5,44 5•-0 5-0'14 5•-0u.. 6 (20.4).. (20._0),. 8x12 (20'-0) x,.(70'-0) BA (20-0) is (20' -0) &X, (2p-0) gx 6 (20-0) - 14' -10x7 0_10: 5-ok 13• -101 of 8• -2? 24G3 '00urg-LCK 24co 110081E-101( PANEL RANGE 81101 BOTH SLOES OF FRAME 85' -0 0/0 STEEL • On CoA NOTE: i &1,71' USE (1)' HARDENED '.WASHER PER .EACH A325 BOLT 11E OICERROiD 6 ENI*IQR 6•RE006) ice Ok 019111. PRCICI. APRE IOAID EXPIRES 10121113 DRAWING STATUS EQUEESSUAL. .. THESE DRAWINGS... BEING FOR APPROVAL, .ARE BY DEFINITION NOT `. RNAL. AND ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL- REPRESENTA110N 00.1. THEIR • PURPOSE 6 TO CCMFIRA4 PROPER NTErPRETAnON OF TIE PROJECT • B DOCUMENTS ONLY DRAWINGS ISSUED -FCR CONSTRUCTION- CAN BE NO. A THESE DRAWINGS BEING FOR PO RMII, ARE BY OET40110N NOT FINAL 84 THAI AS A 148414U114. PIECE MARKINGS ARE NOT. 0EN111E5. ONLY ORAMNCS ISSUED " FOR CONSTRUE-1CM CAN 8E CONSIDERED AS .,..�N: • FOR CONRIRUCIIC FNAL ORAIAN0S metallic building company: Ni RES 1301 TAENLi4 • HMSO TEXAS • P.O. Box 40338 • ' . . NE MAD DP 77041 . (713) 446 -7388. ID 71240 DESoFPBm FRAME CROSS SEC00N SE SEE BUILDING DESCRPOCN SHEET CI O610WR SEA CON . .,' 'GEORGE H0SEN BODY ca LOFA1ON TUKWU WA OK BT aro 8T DATE _ . 5001E 'MHO. - 'PH MUSE 9EET I0.. 800 NONE 0805- 195789 - ' : A g (10 of'12 B 5'-0t, to (20 -0) 6x (20 -0) i (20-0) .. ... 6xa (20-0) .6c4 (26-0) 77' -2 HAUNOi T0. HAI8d01 CLEARANCE 85-0 0/0 STEEL NO HO F Dt E BB UCERF 0ED CDS -: BE OYRN PROJECT. DA ..:16% FRAME CROSS SECTION AT LINE 9 NOTE: USE (1) HARDENED WASHER. ;:PER EACH. A325' BOLT' . EXPIRES' ` 1021,03 I. 0 DRAWING STATUS FOR APPROVAL N0. - THESE DRAWINGS. : BEING- FOR APPROVAL, ARE BY DEFINITION NOT'* A FINAL, 'N41) ARE • FOR. CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY. THEIR .' PURPOSE:IS TO 0(BF(R PROPER INTERPRETATION OF 1)E PROJECT -B DOCUMENTS. ONLY DRAIINGS .ISSUED 'FOR CONSTRUCTION" CAN BE 0 THESE,ORAWINCS; BEING FOR PERMIT, ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL -, -THAT,- AS A.M@IWN,- PIECE- MARKINGS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED: ONLY - • DRAWINGS- ISSUED " FOR .CONSTRUCTEN CAN.ec CNNSDERED. AS .. NEWSKWS DATE OESERPTION BY CUED 08/28/01 FOR PERMIT. & APPROVAL. NS RES MET ll l'[ 09/14/01. FUSED FOR PERMIT & APPROVAL NE 080 ERWI ON FRAME- CROSS SEC110N metallic building company 7301 FARM/ • HOUSTON, 1D(AS • PO: BOX 401.18 9ff SEE BUILDING.DESCRP00N SHEET CI aFOR CONSTRICTION FINAL 'DRAWINGS. come .SEA CON LQCAmN_ -WAWA, WA DBE BY CID BT . .. DATE C' GEORGE HBSER 8001 CO. . CCO BY Ns '. SOLE - ' JCB N0... PH EADC O Y. SHEET NO. ME NONE 0805- 195789. A,8 •E11 of 12: 8 -PURL N LAP DETAIL 12• LAP (EXTRA.EGNG LA?) EAVE STRUT PUR! IN DETAIL hrfB'JO,4. STRUT . PURLIN DETAIL KNOCK -IN BRIDGING _ • ANGLE BRACE DETAL CONNEC110N 0 BASE PLATE ANGLE BRACE DETAIL CONB€CIDN 0 TOP HIGH EAVE DETAL SCULPTURED EAVE TRAY /.SHEETED WALL LEAN -TO; 11E-IN DETAL DETAIL AT EXISTING WALL RAKE DETAIL NASOM2Y WALL GENERAL DETAILS WALL TO ROOF DETAIL. AT CANOPY RTE. SUPPORT FRAMING DRAWING STATUS ND. THESE DRAINGS,' BEING FOR APPROVAL, ARE BY DEFNNIDN NOT FNAL, AND ARE F00 CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY.. THEIR PURPOSE IS TO CONFIRM PROPER INTERPRETATION OF 17E PROJECT DOCUMENTS. ONLY DRA/07GS ISSUED "FOR CONSTRUCTION" CAN BE DATE 08/28/01. [EXAMEN ' • FOR PERMIT a APPROVAL ' BY NS' a(0 ES metallic building company THESE DRAWINGS. BEING FOR FERIOT, ARE BY DEFINITION NOT FINAL . 01.114041, AS A 1@NMAI PIECE MARgNGS ARE NOT GEMMED. ONLY . DRAWINGS' ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTOR" CAN BE CONSIDERED AS ❑ FOR CONSIIIDCPON • F717AL WANKS. 6ESOPIEN : (; NERAL AEIARS '7701 FAME/ • MERN, TEXAS •.PA BOX 40138 ;ID 77041 ' (713) 166 -77®. . IP. 77240 SZE SEE BUILDING CESCRP1101 SHEET CI 015101C1 ' SEA CON , com HELSER BODY CO MR BY SOME NONE JOB N0. Ri 0005- 195789 RIGID FRAME COLUMN DIMENSIONAL CHART GM W. - DM '8' MI TY DM .c. ON b'. 8 . '2 I' 0 -101 7 . 10 4 IS 0 -114 . .5. 11 - 6 A 1- 3..; . or Or.- and OP mlr Oro, Dar 8 SC1 7 9.'58 92 -.. 10 : - SC19' 'B. SC59' 92 11 SC74 9 SC60 193 . ENDWALL ' GIRT i4 ENDWALL: GIRT ;. SIDEWAIl GIRT. GIRT CUP E i,464(E) 6 Wil 111111111111111111 - C :CORNER COL GIRT C IP'' E I0fai(E)xl' -41 }'f - i'I'-. MB. `'. (TYPICAL) MAIN FRAME COLUMN GIRT CONN" (,9 BYPASS SIDEWALL-AND FLUSH ENDWALL ) CUPS x(E) WF" CORNER COLUMN CORNER COL ' SIDEWALL GIRT GIRT CLP ' 1z O x 1' M.B. t 1CCox(F),1 -44 (TYPICAL), ZING FRAME CORNER COLUMN GIRT CONN . (o BYPASS - SIDEWA L AND BYPASS ENDWALL) I2� ' ENDWALL COLUMN CAN BE A SINGLE CEE, DOUBLE CEE BUILT -UP PLATES OR 8)1 SHAPED MEMBER.. I� 0D0 StiHOP:WELDED CUPS' t3 x6 x0612 (SC 3) FORM COLUMN ' SHEETING 44" 4x2x16 6.+ SIDEWALL , 17TO 0 r 8 GIRT vG FRAME CORNER. COLUMN GIRT; CONN. 0 BYPASS SIDEWALL AND FLUSH ENDWA I ) ' ENDWALL COLUMN. CAN BE A SINGLE CEE, CEE, DOUBLE CEE BULL- UP .PLATES OR HILL SHAPED MEMBER. :. MEMBER SCREW STEEL UNE STITCH. SCREWS 0 20' 0.C. (TYP) "'PBR' PANEL CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM DETAIL' 0 "PBR' PANEL CBRNER TRIM DETAIL' N "A° PANEL .5 STEEL LINE MEMBER: SCREW STITCH 20' o. � J TRIM $534 rum 51 F MOM 1 x1'8.8 (TYPICAL) :. GIRT (TYP) ' COLUMN GUTTER CLIP . `.IS. CLOSURE AT 48' 0.C. STITCH SCREW GUTTER CLIP AT 48' 0.C. VE1818 GUTTER ELVE STRUT • GUTTER 040811001 SLOT (FIELD BEND) OQ� . DOWNSPOUT STRAP POP PoVET lint GIRT. POP RNET SP0CE �Ii SPLICE (IF ROOD) 3 (E'D) WALL PANEL ��•I - 4111IP 10 FORMED BASE 1101 - FINISHED FLOOR' �- 'OVERFLOW 5L0T (FIELD BEND) • DOWNSPOUT STRAP SHOP WELDED CLIPS t:3 x 6 x 0=6} (SC-3).: FLUSH SIDEWALL AND ENDWALL GIRT CONN. ( WORT CUP CONDITION ) ' ENDWALL'COLUMN CAW BE A SINGLE CEE DOUBLE CEE ' BUILT- UP, PLATES .OR MILL SHAPED-MEMBER 4'53, 554 .4 }'41 xo 1' 8.8. (TYPICAL) COLUMN SHOP WELDED CIES t x_6 x 1012 (SC -16) H FLUSH SIDEWALL AND ENDWALL GIRT' CONN.' ( LONG CUP CONDITION.) ENDWALL COLUMN CAN BE A SNg1 CEE. DOUBLE CEE BUILT- UP 'PLATES OR MILL SHAPED MEMBER, 3 EAVE STRUT (2) }16x1',. AC BOLTS, COLD Orma'' COLUMN ��IO4 (2).3' 0 x 1} .` A -325 BOLTS ' MN TO BEARING RAFTER CONN. EAVE STRUT.. OR GIRT HEADER (REID LOCATE). (2) '18x1' M. BOLTS .'I CORNER .TRW HEADER JAMB .. CONN 'CO FRAMED OPNGS;_' 510. EA4E 5EC1(0N W /CUTTER :B"DOWNSPOUTS (to; CONCRETE N0TCH) RAKE TRW :MEMBER SCREW STITCH SCREW 0 12' 0.C. `. OO1SIDE CLOSURE WALL. PANEL ENDWALL $ T 1, STITCH SCREWS 0 12' 0.0. WITH CONTINUOUS TAPE SEAANT UNDER TRM 8• 4n.�•;,a PURIIN (2)'3 f X 1) A -325 BOLTS , .GEE RAFTER ENDWALL COLUM9N ENDWALL' COLUMN TO `RAFTER CONN. • (,0 000 RAFTER '0 BEARING FRAME ) H8L51DE WASHER FLAT WASHER HEX NJT.. ROD BRACE BACK U) MAY BE 4 7I` T TITHE• /IE OF WEB (IF •2* I \; DESIGN) 4\ ROD BRACE ID FRAME DETAIL :) - WEB OF FRAME I.S. - CLOSURE. SDTCH SCREW EAVE TRI EAVE GIRT WALL PAFEL . BASE ANGLE F88SHED FLOOR. SID: PAVE SEC110N W /GUTTER 8 DONNSPOUTS (9 CONCRETE NOTCH) . STITCH SCREWS 0 12 0.0. 81111I CONTINUOUS TAPE 1' SEALANT UNDER TRIIII, ' RAKE TRH/ ' MEMBER SCREW. STITCH SCREW 0 12' O.0 OUISDE CLOSUR WALL PANEL 160010 i2GIRT PURUN " wr RAFTER . :. FLANGE BRACE (IF REO'D) (2) 114 A325 BOLTS ENDWALL , COLUMN ENDWALL COLUMN 'TO RAFTER CONN. (0 HDTROL1 RAFTER 0 BEARING FRAME ) HILESIDE WASHER FLAT WASHER 11E5 NUT PL. 5x6141 BPCK UP PLATE MAY BE LOCATED AT OTHER SIDE OF WEB (F.. RDA .EN DESIGN) CABLE BRACE TO FRAME. DETAIL CABLE BRACE COLD FORMED STEEL` COMPONENTS - .YIELD'STRENGTH = 57.0 K.S.L (TYP.) EMI OTT.- -E9. CO. SUE DIMENSIONS .MEMBER PROPERTIES.. 4 SHAPE' • - 0 c ". _ SECT.. A B . • C D GA. AREA - Ix Iv Sx eff 8 X 2'22 16. '8 2',. . 2'e • .915 16 .850 8.018 -1119 1.840 8. X 2'2 Z 15 - 8 : 21 24 - .929 15 '.962 - 9.019 • 1.271 2 098 8. X 2'22 14: 8 211- ' 2',.. .935 14' 1015 • 9.536 - 1.343 -2279 8 X 2'2 Z 13 - 8 2'6 - • Ye .970 13 • 1 298` 12.123 -1.735 2.978 8 x 24 Z 12 : 8 21< . . 2e .990 12. 1.461 • 13.599' • 1.963 • 3.341 10 X 241 15 10 • 21 •24 .928 25 .1100 15.423 - 1 271 2.781 10 X 2'2 Z 14 • 10 • 211 " 24 • ".935 14 1.160 . 16.258" 1 343 3.112 10 X 2'2 2- 13 -10 211 2e • .970 13 1.484 - .20.701. 1 735. 4.077 10 X 2'2 Z 12 ; 10 .• .211 . 2e . .990 12 ' 1670 - - 23.242.. 1.984 - 4.577 10 X 3 • Z 15 10 311 2'e - .928 15 - 1 238 18.826 3.033 2 842 • 10 X 3 2.14. 10 31. • 5e- -.935 14 1 306 19.846 3.204 3.095 10 X 3 2 13 '10 '• 3', 34 .970 13. 1 670. 25 769 ' 4.130 3.689 10 X'3 :Z 12- 10 " 3/ -.. 36 990 12 - 1880' 28.374 .4.672 ' 4930 12 X 34 Z 14 - 12 3b' 31 .935 :14 .1.451 '30 480 .3 204 - 3 689 12 X 3'2 Z 13 ' 12 - 31, 36' -.970 13 -1 856 38 040 -- 4.131 5 366 • 12 -X 34212 12 31 Ae. 990 12. '2089 .43640- ..4672 • 6370 8 E.S. 16 8 31s 5 1.061 . 16. 1090 11 266 . 2.970 2007 ... A ._ - D 8 0.5 :14 .8 31 :5 • 1.090 14. -1301 :13.390' 3.542" 1.575 8 E.S.' 12.. -.8. 31. -5 - 1.168 22 1873.: 19056 5089 -3948 10 E.S.14 , . • 20 -' •3b 5 -' 0.902 14 1 447': 22.863 • 3.800 . • 023 10 ES. 12 - -10 : 31.- -- ..: 1.168 12 . 2083 3.2040 5.472: '.5.388 12 6.5.14 • 12 . .31; • 5 1.089 24. - 1 593 34.398 , - 4.021 • 3 969 12 E.S. 12 12 31s 5 1.168 12 2 292 • 49.178 • 5.785 _ . 6 980 8 X 2 4 C 16 - 8 • 24 22 -.778 16 - 850'= 6050 ' 697 • 1 760 • Al C U . - - 4' 8 X 2'2 C .15 •8 24 22 .797 15 962 9, 082 .789 2 012 8`5 212 C 14 .8 - -' -24 24..807 14 1015.. 9.569 .832 - 2.171 8 X 2', C 12 '.8 24 • 24 1884 .12 .1 461 13,624 1:194: '3 406 8 X 3 4 C 16 8 34 34 .778 .16 972. 9 972 1375" - 1 808 8 X 3 4 C. 14' -8 34 .: 34 • .707 14 - 1 160 .. 11.856'. :2.880 • 2 359 8 X 3 4 C 12: .8 '34' 34..884 12 . 1670': '16.890 " -2.707 1571 10 -X 34C 12 10 •34 '34 .890 12 1880 - 28.403 2.906' : 4857 12 X 34 0•12- 12 '34 34 :.890- .12- 2090 43.676 -3.065 . 6.287 }' PLATE 478 acu AFTER SPLICE . MEMBER SCREW STITCH SCREW 0 12' O.C. BRAE 68P .'. OUTSIDE CLOSURE EYE BOLT WEB OF FRAME WAIL PANEL win MIS ®!1 it MEM `ice► • JIE `i h �y. (4) 3'fxl4' ,4•® CX 6' 3', 20x3} 12x1' -2; 0 8' CEE . x1 -4 A 10' CEE :.. XT• -640. 12' CEE ,-STIT9 SCREWS 0.12' D.C. WITH CONTINUOUS TAPE -' UNDER. 088 . PURIM MAIN FRAM RAFTER IIJ COLUMN CLIP CHART EMI OTT.- -E9. CO. SUE OP ROL ' 4 BC (Se10LE) . SCIO EC (WWU) - SC20 68x10 • '.. SC80 8 - ;9813. an - 8- - 9825 . SCBD 8 W11418 6 LARGER 5080 3'• x A325 BOLTS, (0.COLD FORMED COLS ) b 3'6 x 1= A325 BOLTS (0 HOT ROLLED COLS ) re7 FLANGE BRACE 000114 (E REORD) - COLUMN CUP SEE CHART COLUMN CUP 010011 ABOVE..:.. AT ■�I` ENDWALL COLUMN EN KC � ` • . : COLUMN MAN T ) ER CONN. • OCT 00r THE UK:ER90ED 6 . ENOMER OF RECORD FOR DE 0018821 PROW. 12 EXPIRES 1023103 1' DRAWING STATUS FOR APPR09AL•..' - .. 13 . 11ESE DRAMS, .BEING FOR APPROVAL. ARE BY DEFINITION NOT . FINAL AND ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY.- 111EIR PURPOSE IS TO CONFIRM PROPER INTERPRETAT15N. OF 11E PROJECT 000UMEN13. ONLY DRAWINGS IS52368 -FOR . CONSTRUCTION CAN BE THESE DRANNO5, BONG FOR PERMIT, ARE BY DEFBUTgN NOT FINAL . 04 THAT. AS A 1@25694, REM MA5XINGS ARE NOT CERTIFIED. ONLY DRANK'S ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION ' CAN. IE.CCN52DLRED AS . COMREIt n FOR CONS1RIJC1I0I .. . NO:' DATE • DESCRIPTOR oco 08/20/01 FCR PERMIT 8 APPROVAL NS TES metallic building company :7301 EARNER • HOIST I: TEXAS P.O. BOX 40338. • . ZP 77041 (713) 466 -7788 , ZP 77240 D 509189 STANDARD DETAILS. 93 SEE BUILDING OESCRPTION SHEET CI OS2DAR SEA CON ' mutt TUKWLA, WA . O5L BY '.001 BY 011E .. 504E . - - MB NO, NONE. 0805- 195189 (FORCE HEISER BODY CO.' FAD B1 . N5 STET Ma EWE S1 of 2 ' A. PH' BID1p0 5C. .1 A,B ROOF PANEL SKYU T,PANEL TAPE SEAL ROOF PANEL SKYLIGHT PANEL MEMBER SCREWS TAPE SEAL ROOF PANEL. FASTENER .pE •12• PANEL ENDS AND INTERMEDIATE GIRTS PANEL END LAPS ONLY MEMBER SCREWS–` TAPE SEALENT— I STITCH SCREW`` AT 20.1 0.C. ROOF PANEL TAPE.SEALANT (FOR ROOF ONLY) 55'x /32 THICK:(510.). SKYLIGHT PANEL`'.: ROOF PAN MEMBER SCREW SPAONCr (AS NOTED) • 'PBR' PANEL AT WALL 4' OF INSULATION i1 OM. VAPOR BARRER AND FOLD VAPOR BARRIER BACK . OVER STEEL PANEL INSULATION. IF RE00.` IS BY OTHERS UNLESS NOTED: END LAP WITH INSULATION INSULATION` IF REO'D. . IS BY OTHERS UNLESS NOTED., 'PBR' PANEL SCREW SPACING • , 1 i... :f..1' I I ICI MEMBER SCREWS STITCH SCREWS AT20'0.C. SECTION 1 BASIC MATERIAL SPEPFICATIONS 3.3 ROOF AND WALL PANEL MATERIAL - 331 .Panel materiel ass specified shall be 26 gouge galvanized steel, coating designation G-90, ar golvlilume A155 as manufactured bp_Bethlehem Steel Corporation, or equaL conforming to the requirements of AS1M A -792 Grade E or Grade' D. ":Minimum yield stress shall. be 80,000 . psi for Grade E and 50,000. psi for Grade D = 3.32 Panel material as specified shall be 24 gouge,gdvonized steel, coatingg desiggnation G -90 or gdvalume 0L55, conforming to the reeq4u�rements of ASTM 0792. Grade 0 ar Grade E:. Minorwm yield sbess. shall be;50,000 P5L Cable Bracing – Extro High Strength Strand per <ASTM A475...` Rod or angle bracing conforms to ASTM A36. CONNECTION BOLTS: 011 0 =325 Except. Puffins, Gits, Eove Struts and 'Flange Braces which are A -307 NOTE: SCREW. PATTERNS SHOWN `- SATISFY UL90 REQUIREMENTS FOR ROOF END I AP SCREW I AYOUT 'R', TRANSLUCENT -ROOF PANELS STANDARD PANEL DETAILS DRAWING STATUS © THESE ORAMIN S,. -BENO FOR APPROVAL, ••, ARE BY DEFMIOON NOT - .FI AL,' AND ARE FOR CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTATION ONLY.. THEIR PURPOSE IS TO CONFIRM. PROPER INTERPRETATION OF me .PROJECT DOCUMENTS. • ONLY DRAMNGS iSS.1D. 'FOR; CONSTRUCIOIP CMJ.BE A 08/28/01 FOR PERMIT -& APPROVAL THESE DRAMNGS, BONG FOR PERMIT. ARE BY DEFNa1511 NOT MAL. N TWAT, AS A MINIMUM, PIECE MARKINGS ARE NOT EKNTNIED. ONLY - ORAMNGS ISSUED " FOR CONSTRUCTION CAN BE 03490ERED AS DESaiPWN I STANDARD PANEL DETALS: WE SEE BUILDING DESCRPTKIN SHEET CI CUSTOMER ' SEA CON ,. GEORGE HEISFR BAY co KID Bi NS = DRL er . OM BT:, 011E Sf0E: JOB N0. fN 51EET NO : 1141E NONE- •.0805- 195789 52 of 2 ' A WCOIOII TUKWILA -WA NFMD6C. A,B .4. NOTE. SIZES OF FILLET WELD FOR WEB TO FLANGE WELD. BELOW 'j THE MATERIAL ©•1/2 : HAS NO JOINT WEB THICKNESS FLANGE THICKNESS 316 1+ To I OVER 12" 10 GA. & 316" 316 - SEE NOTE '2 SEE NOTE 2 14 -, % 316. 616" ,SEE NOTE 14 OVER 38" . / SEE NOTE 3 / / / / / / / /r4 2. 8GTSM : .. NOTE!!! BGTSM =`BACK GOUGE TO SOLID METAL (:TYPICAL) > %" THE.; 0 L/2 ® L/2 1: '16" FLANGES ARE NOT 'TO BE USED FOR WEB THICKNESS.OF 14" OR. OVER UNLESS SPECIFIED BY ENGINEERING.: 2. ..WELD SIZE EOUALS TO' THICKNESS OF WEB OR :, SEE NOTE 5.. 3:. FOR WEB THICKNESS OVER 36; ALL FILLET SIZES MARE TO -BE. SPECIFIED. BY ENGINEERING. -' 4. WELD BOTH SIDES OF WEB TO FLANGE .3° BEYOND BOTH ENDS OF BRACKET 5 FLANGE TO FLANGE OR FLANGE TO CONNECTION ;, PLATE WELD SIZES ARE DETERMINED. BY THE FOLLIVING CRITERIA:" • t1.< -.38 316° FILLET - 3a < :t1 '< 34 . '.I�WTH '4 FILLET. • t f , > 34 -NWITH Sfi. FILLET • CRANE BEAM WELD -NEED NOT EXCEED THICKNESS OF THINNER PART.JOINED: - ®► TW ®A I /2 6.' WELD SIZE • IS TO'BE 1T6 , LESS THAN THICKER PLATE. - ®r. 1/2 ®� TYP.. BUT -NOT. TO EXCEED THICKNESS40F THINNER PLATE. © - 7. OPPOSITE SIDE WELD LENGTH TO;BE - O'DIMENSION - <4 ' PLUS 3;INCHES. AND b DIMENSION . PLUS 3 .. INCHES.. IoJIII > :38"' FLANGES> n BGTSM '' 1/2 (% 1/2 UNDERHUNG CRANE BRACKET BUO.T -UP COLUMNS QTLY BOTTOM RANGE MA&MWMX ® •L ©'L /2..- -. I NOTCH • TYPICAL STIFFBE DETAIL SECTION A -A V T>ir > V 1) > 1,*..A. -/SAME MATERIAL: ". ` ' AS PIPE aT7EE,," :0E 1008T9088 IS - fHE DOTER OF RE CO ' /OR TK- OVERAD- PRDECI. . ®. '1. 2 © 1/2 TYP, RANGE BRACE CUP RUNWAY BEAM OCT O 9:210 ©1. RUNWAY END DRAWING STATUS THEY MAILINGS, :9ENO FOR APPROVAL,. ARE BY DEFINITION NOT • FINAL; AND ARE •FOR. CONCEPTUAL REPRESENTARON 011.0 TNER.• ..`.PURPOSE 6 TO CONFIRM 'PROPER INTERPRETATION OF THE' PROJECT • DOCUMENTS.' ONLY DRAWINGS ISSUED "FOR CONSIRUCRON"'CAN BE THESE DRAWINGS. BEING FOR PERMIT, ARE BY OEF451100 001 FINAL. . N THAT.:AS.* MINYIEt PIECE •MARKINGS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED. ONLY ORAIANGS' :1591E0 "• 1014 CCNSIRUC110N "•CAN BE•CONSDE6ED AS' FOUL DRAWNGS.• 08/28/01 FOR PERNIT 8 APPROVAL - NS RCS EXPIRES 10123/0_ rnetnll:ic building company 7301 FARMER • ROSIN, IEXAS • PO BOR 10330 ZP 77041 - (773) 465 -7755 .'05' 77210 . . (CSC?PDON STANDARD WELONG DETAILS • ' > • 1 513 -- SEE BUILDING DESCRPTIDN SHEET CI CUSTOMER SEA CON = A ON TUKWILA, WA' DATE .: SOLE NONE 0805- 195789. GEORGE HEISER BODY CO. T11 DAB FAD BT NS . SHEET NO • W1 of 1.