Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E01-027 - FIVE RIVERS SUBDIVISIONFIVE RIVERS PLAT 53"° AVE S & S 158T" STREET E01 -027 Sze_ be) I -064f C 06= ooh C0 Chronology of Five Rivers Plat applications • The Department of Community Development received the subdivision and SEPA applications on October 22, 2001. • A notice of incomplete application and technical review comments were sent to you on November 19, 2001. Additional comments from City's Public Works Department were sent to the applicant on December 28, 2001 and January 4, 2002. • The applicant requested an extension to submit the additional information. A one 120 -day extension was granted till June 19, 2002. • A partial resubmittal was received on June 19, 2002. The applicant submitted the completeness items but did not address the technical review comments. For the purposes of completeness review your application was considered complete on June 20, 2002. However code based review could not proceed because the technical review comments were not addressed. In the June 19, 2002 resubmittal the applicant requested the Director to review wetland report and the request for deviation from sensitive areas ordinance (filling of wetlands). The applicant was informed that a request to fill a wetland is a separate Type 2 permit. Type 2 permit application was provided to the applicant. However we did not receive any Type 2 permit application. • Nevertheless the City did some preliminary review of the wetland report as part of your SEPA application and the letter dated September 13, 2002 provided comments related to the review of the wetland report. The applicant was also informed that he must address all comments listed in the previous letters dated November 19, 2001; December 28, 2001; and January 4, 2002 for the city to complete its review of your SEPA and Subdivision applications. • The applicant requested that the wetland issues be resolved first and a revised wetland report was submitted on September 25, 2002 and a revised survey was submitted on October 7, 2002. • Letter dated November 15, 2002, was sent to inform the applicant that the City's wetland biologist is in the process of reviewing their wetland report and it may be helpful to set up an on -site meeting with their biologist and Gary Schultz. • Subsequent to the on -site meeting, Gary sent an email on February 12, 2003, to their biologist summarizing the wetland issues discussed on -site. • Peer review comments from Shannon and Wilson regarding geotechnical report were received on May 2, 2003 and were sent to the applicant on May 6, 2003. • A letter was received from their wetland biologist on June 5, 2003, as a follow -up to the on- site meeting along with the revised wetland boundaries. • A letter was sent on July 1, 2003, by Gary Schultz, after the on -site assessment of the revised wetland boundaries and he asked for some further documentation and a complete wetland report. • On September 5, 2003, the applicant resubmitted the wetland report and the geotechnical report with slope stability review as requested by Shannon and Wilson in May, 2003. • Gary Schultz sent an email on September 17, 2003, clarifying some information with their biologist. • Peer review letter was received from Shannon and Wilson on September 23, 2003 stating that the applicant's revised geotechnical report that was submitted on September 5, 2003 meets the standards of Tukwila Municipal Code. • On September 25, 2003, the applicant submitted the revised wetland report taking into account Gary's comments sent by email on September 17, 2003, along with the revised survey map for just 8 lots instead of 12. The applicant stated that if everything looked good to Gary then he would submit for Special Permission application for wetland impacts. Letter was sent on October 16, 2003, along with Gary's letter dated October 14, 2003, and Public Works comments dated October 9, 2003. Gary's letter approved the revised wetland boundaries and asked the applicant to submit a written request for wetland impacts. • The applicant submitted Special Permission application for wetland impacts on January 20, 2004. A letter of complete applicant and request for additional information was sent on February 18, 2004. • A meeting was scheduled with Steve Lancaster, Public Works, the applicant and his consultants on August 12, 2004. The applicant was asked to explore possibilities of avoiding the impact to the wetlands and address the geotechnical issues. • A letter was sent to the applicant on December 10, 2004, informing them that the City will be adopting the new Sensitive Areas Ordinance and their options for vesting. The applicant's wetland consultant advised them to be reviewed under the new code. So they filed a new Short Plat and SEPA application on June 17, 2005. • Notice of complete application was sent on June 23, 2005. The notice requirements were met on June 27, 2005. • Request for additional information regarding wetland boundaries was sent on July 29, 2005. • Re- submittal was received on September 14, 2005. • • Sandra Whiting, Urban Biologist revisited the site to confirm the reflagging effort. An on -site meeting was scheduled with Larry Fisher, Washington Fisheries Department to confirm that the drainage channel in the northwest corner of the lot was not a regulated stream. It was not called a regulated watercourse. Since there was a potential of change in lot layout due to wetland comments, detailed comments from Planning, Public Works and Sandra Whiting were sent together on November 3, 2005. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E c f 2 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: a Building ❑ Planning Public Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec Project Name: I lek/ Address: .r -2) 1r( -�-e— S c C " Date Transmitted: 65-a- Z �-/ 7447 f Response Due by: Qv 5 vuU Staff Coordinator: 1/1 t Dt�`'�"Date Response Received: Instructions The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and t) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working flu ��4 work ing days! bu ct_f p eeih icsn ciAZ m,t71 P L u 31,`20 4€ c l i 'l i c- cd I I� �� Y 1u (k � i c'-v' iee &rd ► 1 kne. ! be0.* icriA d4 ni) '1 it ` }CCU+ Y 1 'cd l� ha� key 1'6Y oorPe erin +14-P S, �'e CY.vi� ti,e. 5-6 i l S m1- (125 471 CYiqeei.n. toys itve. house .#- t.wvacz+(c,- 71-5, Item �d are par 7 T%re 4 ► vJo3i Vale Jxo kurtorV eta-2_ mil 0409 40 pro ? „1 -. Comments Prepared by: ) LAQA(f Date: ld /o?f /© / • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E d( --Ca 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: [ Building ❑ Planning JIPublic Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec Project Name: cl IV Address: c S S Date Transmitted: ( -! Z �-i, 217 f Response Due by: i k''D Staff Coordinator: 0/1 t Date Response Received: Instructions The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and t) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working days! Iry Cov'cRcv s Comments Prepared by: C-5 Date: 1 k 1 Aci 6 CITY OF TUOVILA Q Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 LA) R�� scPA- 3O 'f fa. 0 /:avlBv,t f.. 5 duo{ , -c�cc. 1 Syu,v_ P !1121.416,4 © ?gyp ?No " Pre Application Checklist 61 514 A‘64a !. i +3.?rn A� }•,• ri .. •,;.{ t,,r•r. ?)9 y. �:" •. )t: ✓'�!t d;, ®S1 •'i!::1.* '.', • i - f i ' ��! 9 �W vS ild a�ai�!n° i� . roject ame;!FIVE IVERS PRELIM- PL iteAddress.:158xx53 AV.SL } '�r J,`:I•if+s3 ;�:°4•:'. ':•<:' {•y'ae3,a•q'ii`'_Fati:•a ?�LipX Y': 4;i ^T•.'�6,!;:..• The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PLANNING DIVISION - Land Use Information Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation Binding Site Improvement Plan Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Design Review Design Review - Interurban Environmental (SEPA) A Planned Mixed Use Development Planned Residential Development E43. Zoning designation: b R V 4. Minimum setback requirements: Front: (9.,b Side: 6- 5. Maximum Building Height: '0 tif ❑ Rezone ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Tree Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Sign(s) Subdivision Unclassified Use Use Variance Other: Aav, 69TS Site located in sensitive area? rrYes n No Cti/3o 3 k + die? hcY r "`e Side: S Rear: 10 Height exception area? ❑ Yes 5 No Minimum parking stalls required: 9 leiwetll Handicap stalls required: NM/t- No more than 30% of required parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. STVUt M! l� yy -aao1 4s"ta Jl x.r, Minimum landscaping required: Front: Side: Side: Rear: Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). 10. Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 11. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 12. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. YO.�i rodeo ��� l3 Phy hyu.ch,.. ( fat& it,004 to l 6% ; Gc - ea - YEC� rr r {q r� Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: P,w pcsvL rvvlux LA-hit/A- !Ltorr¢cJ tiM mkGLii -. M w ' t' itIcQ,, ±0 wi4,- dtAitko +,�4^ / Lu k„,tt„ ' ‘4, s(A) . fYvyll \dre\planlist.doc 11/9/00 CITY OF *MI LA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 Pre Application Checklist Pre - Application File No.: PRE00 -053 t. Meeting Date and Time: 11 -16 -00 3:30 Prole'ct Name; • Site Address..; Five Rivers Prelim'!Plat. 158zx AV S The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. ENVIRONMENTAL j/1\ tl "1 �'Q, J Q,�! (�, //A /0 1) Undeveloped slopes that are 20 percent and greater are generally considered as sensitive areas and subject to tl Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO). Areas of Potential Geologic Instability are addressed in the Ordinance which Section 18.45.080 E. of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC). The applicant will provide a professional la! survey to identify sensitive area slopes, if present on the property. "Unnatural" slopes created from previous leg grading activities can be exempt from the requirements of the SAO. The subject property appears to have undeveloped slope areas that are 20 percent or greater in gradient. geotechnical investigation will be required for development proposed on sensitive area slopes to determi] mitigative measures. Generally, the level of geotechnical review is related to slope alterations and design f stability. The site is in an area of significant groundwater discharge and potential landslide hazard. Knov landslide areas are present on properties directly south. 2) Natural slope areas, 20 percent or greater, that are cleared for development will be subject to the Tree Ordinan (Tree Regulations - TMC Chapter 18.54). Only trees present on sensitive area slopes will be subject to the Tr Regulations. As the property appears to be mostly forested, a tree permit will likely be required for this proposal. 3) There is a potential for surface water features and wetlands on this property. A wetland reconnaissance delineation study will also be required during the review of this application. Checklist prepared by (staff): \drclimvlis,.doc 11/21/00 Date: /7/2/0 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us SETA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra ?jape: P -PSUBP Planner: File Number: 60/ - 021- Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number P 2L tv 0 - °S Z Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: L 0/ ^ 0 641 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: FIVE. Riv LEVA Lap Prn - 12 LOT REST DEt-4T7 AL PLAT LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. Is8 lelc 53'4 AN E S. LOT 1 O F 8 Roo <'I TR PrGTS- T L. 4 lIS72,0- oa90 -c Quarter. SW Section: 13 Township: Z3 Range: 4- (This information may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: Signature: • �4 of S • 20'4- Z53) $So - GAITHAMIANOUSLAPPLSUBPR95.DOC. 06r211I00 P. I= . / 3-AEe6i2 GEC 1 v-12-1 ai G L. • 4F-r. -tr l t.)fl . 9ao3f _ FAX: (2,53) G50 - O 155- - Date: /0 ZZ 01 fGr.ew.a'w D��2,1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: J� !J!>>) nrT 2 2 2001 The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know' or" does not apply'. Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about govemmental regulations; such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.. _Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non - project proposals: Complete this checklist for non - project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply'. IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non - project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project', "applicant ", and "property or site should be read as "proposal ", "proposer", and "affected geographic area respectively. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Proposed Five Rivers Plat -12 Lot residential subdivision 2. Name of Applicant: Five Rivers Development, Inc. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owner & Applicant: Five Rivers Development, Inc. Siraj Khan 27010 115 Ave. SE Kent, WA. 98031 (253) 653 -6491 Contact : James Jaeger, P.E. Jaeger Engineering 9419 S. 204 Place Kent, WA. 98031 (253) 850 -0934 3. Date checklist prepared: Octo. 1, 2001 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila Planning Dept. 1 Evaluation For Agency Use Only 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction in summer 2002, or as soon as possible after receiving all required approvals. Project will continue with most work being performed during Summer & Fall of 2002. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. There are no plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal. 7. Ust any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A Geotechnical analysis of fill and steep slopes has been performed. A traffic analysis has been performed. Storm drainage analysis and report, and a level 1 downstream drainage analysis will be performed for the engineering submittal. 8. Do you know whether applicaflons are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No current applications are pending. A permit will be required by the WSDOT for the drainage system connection to the existing drainage system along the Interstate 5 ROW. 2 9 List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Applications and approvals will be required for the sanitary sewer and water main from the City of Tukwila. The drainage system connection will t require a permit from the WSDOT. The fire marshal) will review and approve the fire hydrant location. The USPS will approve the mail box locations. 11. 10. Ive brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed project is a 12 lot residential subdivision consisting of single family, detached dwelling units. The property has a total area of 2.69 acres and is zoned LDR. There will be a drainage Tract for on -site stormwater control and treatment. Access to the lots will be from a single cul-de -sac that is connected to 53rd Ave. S. Frontage improvements will be made to 53rd Ave. S. with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. All lots will be serviced with public water and sewer. 11. _ Locaffon of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, 0 known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Location: The property is located on the east side of 53rd Ave. S, at S. 159th St. There is no site address. It is located in Section 23, Township 23 N. Range 4 E., W.M. Legal Description: A portion of Tract 9, BOOKVALE GARDEN TRACTS, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, Page 47, in King County, Washington.ding to the plat thereof, recorded in volume 12 of plats, page 60, records of King County, Washington. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (under line one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes mountainous. other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 40%, within future Lot 12 near the southwest comer of the property. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils investigation discovered that a portion of the site is covered with a fill material. The native soils are Alderwood sandy, gravelly loam (AgC). No agricultural or farmland. d. Are there .surface Indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe-the:purpose, type, and approximate quantifies of any filling or grading -_-proposed: indicate source of fill. Substantial grading in the form of fill has already occurred under previous a previous ownership not known at this time. Future grading of approx. 5000 CY is anticipated for utilities and for road construction. It is anticipated that the cut and fill will be balanced within the site. If possible, the needed fill material will be taken from the on -site cut material. However, it is possible that existing fill will need to be removed and structural fill imported. The source is not known at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? if so, generally describe. Yes, during rainy construction periods erosion could occur on un- protected disturbed slopes. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The impervious surfaces for the proposed project will include the new roads, houses, driveways, decks, walkways and other residential elements. The approx. percentage of area of impervious surface will be 25 %. 4 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other Impacts to the earth, If any Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth include temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control measures as specified within the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures include the installation of silt fence or hay bales, sedimentation ponds, interceptor ditches, seeding or mulching exposed surfaces that are expected to remain as such for long periods of time, the application of water to exposed surfaces during dry seasons for dust control. Permanent erosion and sediment control measures include seeding exposed pervious areas for vegetation. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust (suspended particulates) and construction exhaust emissions to the air will occur during the temporary : construction period. Automobile emissions will result from the completed project from the resident traffic and wood smoke from fieplaces. No quantities are known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. In general, the adjacent freeway can be a source of off-site emissions and odors. These would be related to the vehicular traffic associated with a busy freeway. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractors will be required to implement standard practices for dust suppression such as the application of water to exposed surfaces, during construction. Standard exhaust filters will be on the construction equipment. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. N_� 5 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not located within a 100 -year flood plain. 6) . - Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If - so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater as part of this project. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, If any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, chemicals, agricultural: etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No septic systems. The City of Tukwila provides complete sewer service. 6 c. Water Run -off (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of run -off (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (Include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water run -off from all impervious surfaces will be collected in road gutters, catch basins, roof drains, etc. and directed into a piping system. The pipes will direct the water to detention pond/ wetpond and will be discharged to the existing drainage system within the west side of the 1 -5 Freeway. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials, such as road oils /contaminants, could enter the surface water if they are introduced into the system and are not removed by water quality facilities. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run -off water Impacts, if any: Best Management Practices proposed for erosion /sedimentation control during construction. Facilities for drainage control including detention ponds will be used Facilities for water quality enhancement such as wetponds, catch basin sumps, and oil /water separators will be used. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: flr, cedar, pine, other - ornamental shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is covered with second growth trees and sparse grasses and shrubs. Clearing will be extensive because most of the site will be regraded due to the exsting fill area. Most of the alder and evergreen trees will be removed for road and utility construction. . c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site None are known. 7 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Much of the completed landscaping will be new residential type landscaping consisting of lawn, shrubs and ornamental trees. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other crows, robins X Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. squirrel, rodents. rabbits Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Eastern gray squirrel and songbirds are typical of westem Washington forests and residential neighborhoods. 7 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Puget Sound area is part of the Pacific Flyway. Birds that inhabit the area vary seasonally due to migrations. However, the area is not part of a larger, permanently preserved migratory bird habitat. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, ff any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The energy needs for the project site will be met through services offered by Puget Sound Energy. Puget Sound Energy will be servicing the project site with natural gas and electricity. These services will be used for heating, appliances and general household uses. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 8 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? Ust other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The contractors will comply with applicable City of Tukwila and other local energy conservation requirements, such as the UBC. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no known environmental heath hazards that would be of potential concem during construction of the proposed project. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. It is not anticipated that there will be any additional demand for special emergency services to serve the site as a result of the proposed project. Typical emergency services such as fire, police, medical may be required as is typical for any residential development. 2) Proposed measures to-reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Since there are no known environmental health hazards associated with the project, no measures are proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation; other)? The adjacent freeway will produce noise that likely will affect the finished podduct. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The operation of construction vehicles on -site during clearing, grading, sitework and the construction of the proposed houses will cause a short-term increase in daytime noise levels in the project vicinity. Construction would take place during normal hours for construction as permitted by the City. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, If any: Contractors will be required to confine on -site construction activities to daytime hours, in accordance with County ordinances. Equipment will be equipped with mufflers. No mitigation proposed for the freeway noise. 9 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The existing site is undeveloped and vacant. It was previously graded and is now in a state of re- vegetating. The adjacent uses are typically moderately sized residential lots, City street or State freeway. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LDR - Low Density Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Single family residential. g. If applicable,-what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The site is not within a Shoreline Environment. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Based on an estimated average of 3.5 people per house, there will be approx. 42 people residing in the completed development. J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, If any: 10 The proposal is consistent with site zoning and Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations for the property. Building setbacks will be in accordance with the City of Tukwila requirements. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? indicate whether high, middle or low - income housing. 12 new housing units will be provided. It is anticipated that these units will be in the middle - income price range. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior bulldingrmaterial(s) proposed? The tallest height of the typical proposed house structure is estimated to be 30 feet. The principal exterior building materials for the houses will be wood siding and comp shingle roofs. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any No such measures will be needed since no such impacts are expected. 11. Ught and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposed project will install street lighting as may be required by the City, or as is standard installation by Puget Sound Energy for residential developments. It is likely the light and glare will slightly increase during the night as the result of the proposed project. b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None that we are aware of. 11 c. What existing oft -site sources of Tight or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off -site sources of Tight and glare in the project vicinity would be from streetlights and motor vehicles operating on adjacent roadways. These sources or light and glare are not considered to significantly affect the proposed project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control fight or glare impacts, if any Any street Tights that are installed will be low -glare, directed down. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Designated recreational opportunities closest to the site include Crystal Springs Park, located directly west and across 53rd Ave. S. from the property. b. • Would:the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. • Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to.be "provided by the project or applicant, if any A fee is proposed to be paid in lieu of providing a recreational site. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are no known places or objects listed for, national, state or local preservation registers within or near the project. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There are no known landmarks or evidence of historic; archaeological; scientific; or cultural importance located on or near the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed. 12 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The proposed plat plan shows access from 53rd Ave.. A central on -site cul- de-sac is proposed to service all of the Tots. b. Is site currently served by public transit? if not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site and its immediate surroundings are not served by public transit. The nearest public transit site is approx. Y2 mile to the southeast at southcenter. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will provide 48 parking spaces based on four parking spaces per lot. Depending on the length of the driveways, there may be more. There is no existing parking on the site. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The site will require construction of the interior plat road as shown on the proposed plat plan. Frontage road improvements are also proposed for that portion of 53rd Ave. S. that fronts the property. The street inside the plat will be public. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. It is generally considered that one residential lot will generate 10 vehicle trips per day. With this ratio, the estimated new vehicular trips will be 120 per day. There will be approx. 1 peak AM and PM trip per day per lot. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Traffic mitigation fee will be paid as required by the City. 13 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will result in a potential increased need for fire protection, medical and police protection services. It will also increase the demand on the school system. The need for these services are typical for a residential development. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The required impact fees will be paid. The finished lots will be added to the tax base to provide tax support for the public services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electdclly, natural pas, water . refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities for the project include the extension of water, sewer, electricity, gas and telephone within the plat. These services are generally located within the future public right -of -way. The services will be provided by: Sewer and water. City of Tukwila Telephone: Qwest Electricity & Gas: Puget Sound Energy C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: giouzse'u Date Submitted: � • 2Z ?,e Cio, of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila ItlEOEIVEb Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist ern, oFTulcwltA JUN 2!l 202 Date: SO (e_ I (0 2002- PERMIT CENTER Applicant Name: t V Rt v exs- v eJo E;VA -, Street Address: 2701 0 11 5 Ptvt-- SE City, State, Zip: (e.41t Wet. 9 2)03 Telephone: Cag) (i253 — (2+91 DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting Nvith Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 5, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes newer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading.? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary hig5 water mark of a watercourse or the GreenvDuwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where tbe presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate res I onse. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 - YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 2 Ciry of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. N — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the GreenfDuwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and'or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) - Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 City of Tukwila ila ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a, watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Pace 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supposing woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) ITS - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) . YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 4 Cite of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below• the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses gr any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 . • Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. \\'etlands with a "functions and values" rating. for baseflow /g.roundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing. salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloug.hs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, p cularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log., soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Pag.e 2) January 25, 2001 6 PLAT- NO, CITY OF TUKWILA KING: COUNTY, WASHINGTON.- DECLARATION •KNOW' ALL PEOPLE BY -THESE PRESENTS that. we,, the undersigned owners in fee simple of -the land -herein described do hereby make a long subdivision •thereof pursuant to RCW 58.17.060 and acknowledge" that . said subdivision shall not be • further divided in any. manner within a period of five years; from date .of record, without the filing of a final .plat. The - • undersigned further declare this plat to -.be the • graphic representation of said long subdivision and the same is made- with the- free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). • IN WITNESS WHEREOF we set our hands- and seals. Nome. - Name Name - - Name Name .. Name STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King I certify . that 'I. know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his /her) free and voluntary act for • the -uses and .purposes mentioned in the instrument. Signature. of..- Notary Public Dote d My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his /her). free and voluntary act for the uses . and purposes. mentioned in the instrument., . '. Signature of Notary Public Dated. . My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King I' certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 'signed this instrument. and acknowledged it to be- (his /her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. . Signature..af Notary Public Dated My appointment expires IKLAJUKtK J CtKIIrit:AItJ: There ore no delinquent special .assessments,. and all special assessments on any of the property thot is dedicated os streets. alleys or for other public. use. are paid in full. Examined and approved this • _ . date • by this deportment. . • City of Tukwilla Finance Director Date.. • ('certify that • alt property taxes- are paid and that a deposit hos, been made in sufficie4t . amount • to pay the tuxes for the following_ year, that there ore -no delinquent spedcial . . assessments certified to this office for collection;-.and that all special assessments on any of the property herein. dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use are poid' in full. Examined and approved this .. date by thi,s, department. King County Treasurer's Office nns�p�+ vnri �w.0 i,_ n, ExamiAad5nd opprovedgby, this epartment7" this day _ fe. . 2000 • QURe- • Director ' COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and 'approved' by this deportment this day of 2000 ,Date Assessor Deputy Assessor 115:720 -0090' PORTION OF SW 1/4, SW 1/4, S 23, .T:.23,. R 4 E 588 3239T-2653.49' 5881 15'18'E 306.04' 60.0` LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract 9: BR0OKVALE GARDEN'TRACTS, according to the Plat-thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats,: Page 47, in-King County,-Washington; . . EXCEPT that-portion.thereofwithin a tract of land conveyed recorded under Recording No :-5372503, described as follows: Beginning at a'poiat. on the'North- line.of said Tract 9, 330 • 'of the Northeast corner thereof; _ THENCE East 330'feet to. the Northeast corner of. said Tract; .:THENCE South „along the East ..line cf•said Tract to-the Southeast. corner - • `THENCE along the'South.line cf said-Tract; a. distance of 170 feet to a. 'point' oa- a.curve whose radius bears.South•89 °59'24 Nest; - :THENCE Northerly and Westerly,along the- arc'of- •said.curve to :the left • •w•ith.vc radius of 382_47_ feet to a point 50 teet South of the North•line 'of said Tract and .300-feet West'of the East line; THENCE Northwesterly_ in a straigh•- line:to the-point'of beginningv. • . EXCEPT the'South 30 feet thereof conveyed'to:•the•.City of Seattle 'for -.. .. pipeline -.by deed recorded under Recording No.. 3641174; - . AND EXCEPT the South -30 feet thereof lying Easterly of a line drawn . Northerly at.right. angles• to.the South line of said -Tract 9 from a -point • on said South-line- which is' 200 feet Westerly of the "W ": line survey -of .Primary State Highway No..1 -South 178th Street to South'126th.Street. as' •• conveyed to the State of.Washington by. deed recorded•under'Recordirg;No. 5568710;..." - AND.EXCEPT that.pertion of the remainder lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 20 feet•Ncrtheasterly from the D2 centerline of Primary-State Highway•No.- 1,'South 178th Street to South -126th Street. . .as conveyed to the-State of Washincten hy_.deed recerded.under Recording by deed . feet West 97.6' 6371 SF 6000 SF. LOT 3 5956 SF LOT ,4 5105 - SF , m ° 'P' 40.0' 60.0'• ' 245.3' LOT 6 5213 • SF No. 5653378. 40.0' 60.0' 4 e_.natim:a. 0 • LOT 12 7 9591 SF. LOT 9 9555.SF 60,0' S88' 12'49'E 36521' .CITY.OF SETTLE WATER MAIN ROW �3W r TRACT A w f. DRAINAGE LOT 8 � f 16948 SF 10438. SF / / Q �� G-) f 12? .f' / f. / 95,81' a •. • S W M.ST - . - """ 10' . SAN. SEWER ESMT. VICINITY.. MAP :1CT 22 aiui CrV Lt t iJiEi1T VERTICAL' DATUM. NAVD88 ESTABLISHED BY:- WSDOT ID: HC17 -6 Located in. the City of Tukwila, west of. the Southecenter Mall on the .Klickitat Drive /I -5 undercrossing.. The mark is a WSDOT .. brass disk set in the center of the sidewalk in the southeast corner of the bridge. It is 129.0 feet •west of the, centerline of the Southcenter. Parkway and 28.0 feet : south of the centerline of Klickitot. Drive. RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE filed for record this day of 2001 at M in book of at page at the request of the City of ,Tukwilla. DRYCO DRYCO Surveying, Inc. 12714 VALLEY AVENUE EAST SUMNER, WASHINGTON • . (2531 826 =0300 FAX (2531 826 -9703 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I; G. PHIL SARGENT,. CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP CORRECTLY-REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR 'UNDER' MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE - WITH THE REQUIREMENTS- Of' THE SURVEY RECORDING • ACT. FIVE RIVERS. DEVELOPMENT, INC. 27010 115 AVE SE KENT, WA 98031 DWN. BY DATE . • 1 0/1 /2001 JOB NO.. ••• nun .e•.nne.rr • . of a :A..n CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET. A A A PORTION of the S.W. 1/4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E:, W.V. Ex Catch Basin' Rim: 136.59 lE8'1v: 132.14 REVISIONS: .°.0(179 :I Ei Catch Bas. -Rim: 145.01 IEB^N: 142.65. ,T1 se- t Ex. San Sewer Manhole Rim: 146.70 IE Ctr. 136.81 VICINITY MAP NEV.'S'. SIDEVALK NEV VERT. CURB /GUTTER EX. SAN SEVER E. WATER MAIN Ex Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rim: 128.58 1E12'OCtr. 118.76.- NNZ L7.. Id W 0 O g. Z ° 1 o0) 0, c 0 p • 09 Z W •:W:a a W_ W 6 DRAINAGE DETENTION POND/VETPOND TOP, 6708'. SF e. ELEV. 126.0 _ MAL VL 6012 SF 8 ELEV, 125.0 TOP VETPCIN11 3094 SF a ELEV. 120.0 BOT VETPOND 825 SF 2 ELEV, 11•0. VETPOND VOLUME- 11757 cF DETENTION VOLUME, 22765 CF - - - — s — ( —_ iS Cateh Basin Rm: 169.95 0[t 1E12-W: 167.7 S. -159 ST._:" 5' SIDEWALK VERT. CURB /GUTTER 9(N Ex Storrs Manhob Rim: 98.79 1E24- 86.04'' LOV RESTRIC TCM:BAS1N Ex Sto.m Manhole Km: 98.91' 1E12-S. 92.51 IE18'S- 85.66 1E24.9. 85.71 1E24 -NE Out: 85.11 \.V1I,SOltO'Ofk51, 5 Ex Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rim: 127.00 ABANDONED Ex Sanitary Sewer Manhole Rim: .134.97 IEl2 OCtr. 120.49: - .Ex Sanitary. Sewer Manhole -Rim: 125.29 ABANDONED DATE , 10/05/01 SCALE.1'• DRYCO DRYCO �Surveying; Incorporated . 12714 VALLEY:AVENUE EAST, • SUMNER, WA 98390 253- 826 - 0300. FAX 253 - 826x9703 • 2000202 -' DICE PRKIER'I/23/2001 0E9074 BM GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 10. 60 ( IN PEST) 1 inch m 90 ft. - .00T 222001 • CQM0.7UNITY • • DEVELOPMENT JOB Mo.