Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E02-001 - KHAN RESIDENCE
E02 -001 KHAN RESIDENCE 138XX MACADAM RD • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 12, 2002 Tor -Jan Ronhovde The Ronhovde Architects 6625 South 190th Street, Suite B -105 Kent, WA 98032 VIA FAX 425 - 656 -0501 Re: SEPA (E02 -001) 138XX Macadam Road, Tukwila Tax Parcel 152304 -9149 Tax Parcel 322920 -0010 (Lot 1) Dear Tor -Jan: Per our January 16, 2002 letter, the above - referenced SEPA application has been deemed to be incomplete. If we do not receive all of the required items listed in that letter on or before April 16, 2002, that SEPA application will expire. Per TMC 18.104.070(E), the Department of Community Development may extend this April 16, 2002 cancellation date up to 120 additional days (i.e., no later than October 16, 2002) if the applicant submits a written request for an extension prior to this cancellation. However, the applicant's request must clearly demonstrate that the delay is due to circumstances beyond the applicant's control (such as the need for seasonal wetland data) or unusual circumstances not typically faced by other applicants, and that a good faith effort has been made to provide the requested materials. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Associate Planner cc: Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Ciiy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director February 19, 2002 Tor -Jan Ronhovde The Ronhovde Architects 6625 South 190th Street, Suite B -105 Kent, Washington 98032 Re: D01 -345 (residential permit for northernmost lot) E02 -001 (SEPA for two southernmost lots) D01 -179 (residential permit for .southernmost lot) MI01 -147 (land altering permit for 3 Tots) MI01 -148 (retaining wall permit for 3 lots) Tax Parcel 322920 -0005 Tax Parcel 152304 -9149 Dear Mr. Ronhovde: We are returning your submittal which we received on February 14, 2002.. Please be advised that we cannot return Items 3 and 4 (as listed on your February 6, 2002 letter in that submittal) as they were never provided. . We hope the following comments will clarify the status of the above - referenced permits and what steps need to be taken: in order to proceed. This information has previously been discussed in meetings and phone conversations with Sabir Khan, Mohammad Saleem and their various representatives over the past six months. Background Information Applications for both the land altering permit (MI01 -147) and the retaining wall permit (MI01 -148) were submitted in August, 2001 and were deemed to be incomplete. Under both of those applications, the scope of work covered three adjacent lots. For your reference, we have enclosed a copy of the Tax Assessor's Map for SE 15 -23-4 to illustrate their location. However, since the submittal of their applications, the applicants have indicated that one member of the Khan family owns the northernmost lot while the two southernmost lots are owned by a different member of the Khan family. For this reason, the applicants and their representatives have indicated that they now 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Tor -Jan Ronhovde February 19, 2002 Page 2 • wish to process the northernmost lot under one application process and the two southemmost lots under a separate application process. Unfortunately, the applicants and their representatives have failed to provide adequate documentation demonstrating that the three Tots in question are each separate, legal lots. Additionally, they have failed to produce clear ownership information. The following is a partial list of some of the items we have previously requested in our technical review letters: 7- S EPA ( L.o\-s Q§ACC-\ Written documentation from the King County Assessors Office clearly demonstrating that Tax Parcel 322920 -0010 is now a valid parcel number and that is has been formally segregated from Tax Parcel 322920 -0005. 15'2 9( c A current Title Report for Tax Parcel -3-229-20-09057 � • A current Title Report for Tax Parcel 322920 - 0010.. • -A completed, signed and notarized "Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property" for Tax Parcel 322920 -0005 (form enclosed) • A completed, signed and notarized "Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property" for Tax Parcel 322920 -0010 (form enclosed). ts23o1-i-giL\ 9 Revisions to Existing Applications In order to process the northernmost lot under one application process and the two southernmost lots under a separate application process it will be necessary to submit revisions to the existing applications and to submit additional applications. The scope of the land altering application (MI01 -147) and the retaining wall application (MI01 -148) must be reduced to cover only the two southernmost lots. Additionally, a new land altering application and a new retaining wall application must be submitted for the northernmost lot. Please see Items 3 and 4 below for additional information. Due to the quantity of cut and fill associated with the development of the two southemmost Tots, a SEPA Determination is required. A SEPA application covering these two lots was submitted on January 2, 2002 and was deemed incomplete on January 16, 2002. Please see Items 1 and 2 below for additional information. Tor -Jan Ronhovde • February 19, 2002 Page 3 Owner Representatives or Coordinators As you know, we have recommended that each of the owners designate a representative or coordinator to handle the various permit applications. Once each representative or coordinator has been chosen, the Khans should supply them with all correspondence received from the City in connection with the permits referenced above. If representatives or coordinators are designated, please provide a letter from each of the owners indicating which applications they wish the coordinator to process on their behalf. Also provide contact information (full name, address, phone number, fax number) for the applicant and the applicant's coordinator when submitting revisions to any of the five permit applications referenced above. These revisions are to clearly indicate the parcel number and lot number of the property for which the application is being submitted. The use of incomplete addresses (such as 138XX Macadam Road South) on application documentation is not acceptable Additionally, if Mohammad Saleem is no longer a contact person, his name is to be removed from all submitted documentation. SEPA Comments 1. As described above, an application for a SEPA Determination under 'File E02 -001 was submitted on January 2, 2002 and deemed to be incomplete on January 16, 2002. As submitted, the scope of the SEPA application is limited to Tax Parcel 152304 -9149 (the southernmost lot) and a portion of Tax Parcel 322920 -0005 (known as Lot 1). 0010) However, the documentation you submitted on February 14, 2002 pertains to the northernmost lot of Tax Parcel 322920 -0005- (known as Lot 2). You have indicated that the required cut and fill for that property will be Tess than 500 cubic yards, and as such, will not require a SEPA application. Therefore, the materials you supplied on February 14th are being returned. 2. If the applicant under the existing SEPA application wishes to respond to the January 16, 2002 comment letter, he must submit the required documentation under Items 2, 3, 4 and 5 at one time to my attention. This must be done prior to April 16, 2002 or the SEPA application will expire. Please have the applicant or his representative carefully review the Tor -Jan Ronhovde • February 19, 2002 Page 4 • January 16, 2002 letter and then contact me to discuss the requirements stated in that letter before submitting. Segregation or Change in Scope of Existing Permits 3. Application MI01 -147 was deemed to be incomplete on August 23, 2001. If the applicant wishes to reduce the scope of MI01 -147 and submit an additional land altering application, he must contact the Public Works Department. The permit technician in that department (Laurie Werle at 206 -433 -7184) can provide information regarding revisions and submittal requirements. 4. Application MI01 -148 was deemed to be incomplete on August 21, 2001. If the applicant wishes to reduce the scope of MI01 -148 and submit an additional application for retaining walls, he must contact the Permit Center. The permit technicians in that department (Stefania Spencer at 206 -433 -7165 and Kathy Stetson at 206 -431 -3684) can provide information regarding revisions and submittal requirements. 5. Application D01 -345 was deemed to be incomplete on January .11, 2002. The cut and fill calculations provided on February. 14,. 2002 should accompany any submittals or revisions to D01 -345. Please contact the Permit Center regarding revision and submittal requirements for that permit. 6. Application D01 -179 was deemed to be incomplete on June 11, 2001. Please contact the Permit Center regarding revision and submittal requirements for that permit. Please review my comments carefully and discuss this information with the Khans. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, -biti604„ edice Deborah Ritter Associate Planner Enclosures Tor -Jan Ronhovde • February 19, 2002 Page 5 Enclosures cc: Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator Stefania Spencer, Permit Technician Kathy Stetson, Permit Technician Laurie Werle, Permit Technician • - • • T H E RONHOVDE ARCHITECTS I N C February 6,2002 Debra Ritter City Of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 ' E CE e eFEB 1 4 x'06? D opMly`Y Re: D01 -345 Dear Ms Ritter, The purpose of this letter is to request segregation of D01 -345 from SEPA E02 -001, D01- 179, MI01 -147, and MI01 -148. Regarding D01 -345 per your January 16 letter we are be submitting the following: 1) 1 copy cut and fill calculations indicating approx. 390 Cu. Yd. cut and fill. The calculations show that the total cut and fill includes the driveway and the foundation work for the residence, not the driveway only as stated in your January 16 letter. 2) 4 copies of site plan including a vicinity map. 3) 1 copy current title report. 4) 1 copy completed and signed "Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless to enter site ". Please note that Sabir Khan is the owner of this site. We will be submitting documents regarding the other 2 lots separately. 5) 3 copies of soils report supplement Please update the following project information: Owner: Sabir Khan 24719- 43rd Ave. South Kent, WA 98032 253 - 606 -4799 6625 South 190t Street, Suite B -105, Kent, WA 98032 PH. (425) 656 -0500 FAX. (425) 656 -0501 • • Owners Agent: Tor -Jan Ronhovde The Ronhovde Architects, LLC 6625 S. 190th Street #B -015 Kent, WA 98032 I /5/r. • Tor -Jan Ronhovde, Architect, Agent for Owner Managing Member, The Ronhovde Architects, LLC Owner, Cfrelj Sabir Khan • Page 2 CA,€) o dapce4v-c featiota, • print.txt user Name: msaleem Project: tukwilla subproject: north lot driveway, 006 ROADCALC DESIGN EARTHWORK - RAW VOLUMES Date: 01 -24 -02 Time: 10:42:13 Page: 1 CUT AREA CUT VOLUME FILL AREA FILL VOLUME STATION MATERIAL (FTA2) (ydA3) (FTA2) (ydA3) 0 +00.00 orig_surface 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 +10.00 orig_surface 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 +15.23 Orig_Surface 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 6.16 0.60 0 +20.00 orig_surface 0.94 0.08 Total 0.94 0.08 0.38 0.58 0 +30.00 orig_surface 18.41 3.58 Total 18.41 3.58 0.00 0.07 0 +40.00 Orig_Surface 45.14 11.77 Total 45.14 11.77 0.00 0.00 0 +50.00 Orig_Surface 48.92 17.42 Total 48.92 17.42 0.00 0.00 0 +60.00 Orig_Surface 54.23 19.24 Total 54.23 19.24 0.00 0.00 0 +70.00 orig_surface 220.92 90.53 Total 220.92 90.53 0.00 0.00 0 +70.60 Orig_Surface 228.60 4.99 Total 228.60 4.99 0.00 0.00 0 +80.00 Orig_Surface 283.14 89.09 Total 283.14 89.09 0.00 0.00 0 +90.00 Orig_Surface 250.95 98.90 Total 250.95 98.90 0.00 0.00 0 +91.79 Orig_Surface 234.37 16.08 Total 234.37 16.08 0.00 0.00 0 +92.00 Orig_Surface 246.23 1.87 Total 246.23 1.87 0.00 0.00 0 +92.70 orig_Surface 337.06 7.54 Total. 337.06 7.54 0.00 0.00 User Name: msaleem Project: tukwilla Subproject: north lot driveway, 006 ROADCALC DESIGN EARTHWORK - RAW VOLUMES Page 1 Date: 01 -24 -02 Time: 10:42:13 Page: 2 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 4 2002 PERMIT CENTER • • print.txt STATION 0 +97.25 Total MATERIAL CUT AREA CUT VOLUME FILL AREA FILL VOLUME (FTA2) (ydA3) (FTA2) (ydA3) orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total 0.00 0.00 1968.90 1968.90 28.40 Page 2 0.00 0.00 6.54 1.24 • • King Counry Department of Assessments Scott Noble •Act-ourairtg Di' itSietn Assessor :504 F. ourdl Ay: we Sul:de. WA 9S 104-2384 FA?(: (206)296-0106 F4SITAILF COVER SHEET TO: NI\ n, tr. CotnPanY: PhOne: Vast: ) /2) 4- /0 2-- DAIL , fr1,t\19. pj FROM: rRi v1/455 Phciiie: 206 296- 5 i4.0 Fax: 206 296-0106 Coritments: • Total pages faxed including this cover page: . ! —1---. 1 • • Or) 1 0 1/., kr COr.^ • ,. 1 A...1 A / ..- .,-, I 1,--- / 1-‘1 „-.. ,. , -,-;ie_r-,-, • ' ---1- 7 A . i rfj raftA211 i ..-. !e`&%-. t ■ c - e •■ e :::17— - 1 tlit C- 41, 11. . r _....s...- 5 _ ., I /1 .4-.... ' (.‘ ' 5 ---0 rjL. 1 ''-j a 1 12-4 0 0 0 1 0 ) 17 1,*'.. e--1 - t April a. '2 (71. RECEIVED ow OF TUKWILA FEB 1 2002 PERMIT CENTER Page: 1 Document Name: Assessor RPCI 32292000100 DOC: AIA INTERNATIONAL VENTURES 149800 24719 43RD AVE SOUTH KENT WA 98032 LOT:1 BLO CK:1 RY OY ST SC NC LEVY OM -LV 03 T 2413 02 T C 2413 01 T 2413 YEAR RECEIVABLE TYPE 02 NOXIOUS WEED RPCI 322920001003 07/24/01 REVALUE ST:CURNT ACTIVE RELLWIOS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC 01/24/02 PORTION OF GOV LOT 1 .[N NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTTON 15 -23 -04 BEGIN SW CORKER OF GOV LOT 1 TB N 89 -S6 -42 E 270 FT tMPS BLUED PAID P A .00 .00 324.25 .00 F 251.91 ,00 F LAST LEGAL 1S 23 LAND 24,000 24,000 17,500 TOTAL DUE: 577.66 LEVY BILLED AMT P4TD AMT ACRE BENEFIT 9420 1.50 .00 JUMP CODE: nat:c. 1.J7.4 /2402 'Tune: 01 :2.i J5 PM ADDIT1ONAT. DATA P/N Patle. 1. Document Name: Asses6or T11 N 57-41-12.5 H 362_11 FT TH NELY. ALONG SAID ROAD MARGIN OF AN ALLEY AND TH S 57•41-J2.5 N-100.81 FT TM NEL!? 100.25 FT TO POINT 49,9',; PT THEREON NWLY OP TB SELY ALONG SAID ROAD POINT OF BEGINNING ALLEY ADJOINING RPCT 32292000.1003 TO SWLY MARGIN OP CO ROAD MARGIN 12.01 FT TO NWLY POINT BEGINNING TR N 31-08-30 W 45 PT ON SAID MARGIN OF CO ROAD POINT OF PECTNNING MARGIN 49.95 FT TO TGW PORTION OF VACATED JUMP CODE: P/P _ . 'D4te: 1/24/2002' Time:.01:21:23.PM- • .. Page: 1 Document Name: Assessor RPCI 322920000500 KHAN MOHAMMAD A 24719 43RD AV S KENT WA DOC:1-84'7696 1N9999 LOT:2 BLOCK:1 RY OY ST SC NC LEW/ UM- y 0-4 01 00 9 T 241) T T 2413 24 1 3 2411 2413 RY OY ST RC NC LUNY OM-LV • 90 T 24j3 97 T 2417, RPCI 122920000500 Da 14-: : 1.12412002 01] 98032 LAST TS LAND 17,000 17,000 1.),500 33,000 31,000 LANE' 30,000 30,000 JUMP CODE: 11/1.9/01 NAME/ADDRESS ST:CUR•T ACTIVE HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC 24/02 PORTION OF GOV LOT 1 Dq. NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 15-23-04 - BEGIN LEGAL SW CORNER OF GOV LOT 1 113 TH N 89-56-42 E 270 FT IMPS FAILLED PAID F A .00 229.67 .00 F 21)1.91 251.91 499.52 499.52 502.43 502.43 IMPS 8CLLET 426.80 457.81 PAID P A 426.80 457.81 TOTAL DUE: 231.17 ADDITIONAL DATA P/N • • 20011019002259 AFTEF.RECORDING MAIL TO: mohammad Khan 24719 43rd Ave So Kent, WA 98032 Filed for Record at Request of Lakewood Escrow, Inc. Escrow Number: 0 0 - 016 3 3 -RL ti Q WE LTH LAS Statutory Warranty Deed REF: • 20011019002 259 PAGE 001 10/19/2901 M.m El 84 7696 SALE ouNTY 14 : es a '000.00 PAGE 001 OF 001 Grantor(s): AIA International Ventures, Inc. Grantee(s): Mohanmad A. Khan Abbreviated Legal : LOT 2, BLOCK 1 HELLWIG'S ADDITION TO FOSTER Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): 322920 - 0005 -00 THE GRANTOR AIA International Ventures, Inc., a Washington Corporation for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Mohaammad A. Khan, a single man the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington SEE THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Dated 10/17/2001 AIA International Ventures, Inc. By: Saraj Khan, Pres dent State of Washington) )ss County of Pierce ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Saraj Khan is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath state that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the President of AIA International Ventures, Inc. to be the free' and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. f Dated: October 18, 2001 JOANNA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES _ MAY g 0/ `itLt.W nni Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Lakewood My appointment expires:-2-4'O+ • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development January 16, 2002 Mr. Sabir Khan 306 North First Avenue Kent, Washington 98032 Re: SEPA (E02 -001) 138XX Macadam Road, Tukwila Tax Parcel 152304 -9149 Tax Parcel 322920 -0005 (Lots 1 and 2) Dear Mr. Khan: Steve Lancaster, Director You are proposing to construction three single family homes on three adjacent, single - family lots. To date, you have already applied for the following permits: D01 -179 (residential building permit for the southernmost lot). This application was submitted on June 8, 2001 and determined to be incomplete on June 11, 2001. MI01 -147 (land altering permits for three adjacent residential lots). This application was submitted on August 22, 2001 and was determined to be incomplete on August 23, 2001. MI01 -148 (retaining walls for three adjacent residential lots). This application was submitted on August 20, 2001 and was determined to be incomplete on August 21, 2001. D01 -345 (residential building permit for the northernmost lot). This application submitted on October 19, 2001 and is still incomplete as of January 11, 2002. was We have received and reviewed your documentation for the above - referenced SEPA application, submitted to us on January 2, 2002. Your SEPA application has been found to be incomplete. In order to continue processing your application there are additional items that must be submitted to the Department of Community Development. These items are listed below. As stated above, you applied for a residential building permit under D01 -345 on October 19th. In that permit you indicate that the total amount of cut and fill for that site will be 350 cubic yards. The Public Works Department has reviewed your documentation and finds that the cut and fill amount is only for the driveway on that site. The calculation does not cover other proposed grading work on that site. The D01 -345 building site is adjacent to the properties referenced in your SEPA application. If the total amount of cut and fill under D01 -345 meets or exceeds 500 cubic yards, you will be required to apply for a SEPA determination. Both your land altering permit application (MI01 -147) and retaining wall application (MI01 -148) cover your three adjacent building sites. If a SEPA application is also required for the D01 -345 site, you should revise the scope of your current SEPA application to incorporate that building site. Please provide one of the following: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Sv2 Mr. Sabir Khan E02 -001 January 16, 2002 Page 2 a. Calculations demonstrating that the total amount of cut and fill under D01 -345 is less than 500 cubic yards; or b. Revise the scope of your SEPA application documentation to incorporate information pertaining to the D01 -345 building site. 2. Vicinity map with site location. You may insert the vicinity map on the Site Plan. 3. A current Title Report covering all of the property included in the scope of your SEPA application (see Item 1 above). The Title Report must clearly establish the status of the subject property as legal lots of record, clearly establish current ownership of all lots and identify all known easements and encumbrances. Copies of all recorded documents listed in the Title Report are to be attached. PLEASE NOTE: The "Limited Liability Guarantee" dated March 5, 2001 and provided to us on January 2nd does not satisfy these requirements. A completed, signed and notarized "Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property" is to be provided for all owners of all lots comprising the subject property (one copy, attached). The mailing address, business phone and fax number for each owner is to be included. Three copies of all supporting studies with original signatures and license stamp as needed. This is to include the Geotechnical Engineering Report and all supplements. Upon receipt of the required items (1 through 5 listed above), the City will continue processing your SEPA application. The application will expire if we do not receive the requested items referenced above within 90 days of this letter's date (i.e., April 16, 2002), unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.104.070(E) of the Tukwila Municipal Code. If you should have any questions regarding the within, please do not hesitate to contact me at 206 -431 -3663. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Associate Planner cc: Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer STATE OF WASHINGTON • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 F.4X (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukolancT.ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: L I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the resuit of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. EXECUTED at (city) (state), on 20 (Print Name) (Address) (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF , 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on User Name: msaleem Project: tukwilla ' subproject: 5' behind drive, 007 print.txt ROADCALC DESIGN EARTHWORK - RAW VOLUMES Date: 12 -24 -01 Time: 09:33:08 Page: 1 STATION MATERIAL CUT AREA CUT VOLUME FILL AREA FILL VOLUME (FTA2) (ydA3) (FTA2) (ydA3) 0 +00.00 0 +10.00 0 +20.00 0 +30.00 0 +40.00 0 +50.00 0 +60.00 0 +70.00 0 +80.00 0 +90.00 1 +00.00 1 +10.00 1 +20.00 1 +30.00 1 +40.00 Orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total Orig_surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_surface Total Orig_Surface Total Orig_Surface Total 0.43 0.43 8.01 8.01 85.13 85.13 157.30 157.30 173.07 173.07 177.57 177.57 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 1.54 1.54 0.13 0.04 17.86 17.86 0.00 47.90 47.90 0.00 67.40 67.40 0.00 0.00 67.74 67.74 0.00 0.00 151.85 61.51 151.85 61.51 0.00 0.00 114.81 49.38 114.81 49.38 0.00 0.00 79.00 36.57 79.00 36.57 0.00 0.00 40.08 22.05 40.08 22.05 4.95 0.92 18.21 10.82 18.21 10.82 9.72 2.71 31.33 6.02 31.33 6.02 0.00 2.62 243.74 53.15 243.74. 53.15 0.00 0.00 350.90 110.01 350.90 110.01 0.00 0.00 414.40 141.72 414.40 141.72 0.00 0.00 RECEIVED 0.0 3 CITY pF TUKWILA JAN - 2 2002 0.00 PERMIT CENTER user Name: msaleem Project: tukwilla Subproject: 5' behind drive, 007 ROADCALC DESIGN EARTHWORK - RAW VOLUMES Page 1 Date: 12 -24 -01 Time: 09:33:08 Page: 2 print.txt CUT AREA CUT VOLUME FILL AREA FILL VOLUME ' STATION MATERIAL (FTA2) (ydA3) (FTA2) '(ydA3) 1 +50.00 orig_Surface Total 1 +60.00 1 +70.00 1 +80.00 1 +90.00 2 +00.00 2 +06.93 Total orig_surface Total orig_surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_Surface Total 441.12 441.12 20.44 20.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2507.39 2507.39 158.43 158.43 85.47 85.47 3.79 3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 941.36 941.'36 User Name: msaleem Project: tukwilla Subproject: middle lot drive for 5' behind, 008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.86 6.32 ROADCALC DESIGN EARTHWORK - RAW VOLUMES Date: 12 -24 -01 Time: 09:33:43 Page: 1 CUT AREA CUT VOLUME FILL AREA FILL VOLUME STATION MATERIAL (FTA2) (ydA3) (FTA2) (ydA3) 0 +00.00 orig_Surface Total 0 +07.87 0 +10.00 0 +20.00 0 +27.87 0 +30.00 0 +40.00 0 +50.00 Orig_surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_surface Total Orig_Surface Total orig_surface Total orig_Surface Total orig_surface Total 0.00 0.00 310.74 310.74 316.25 316.25 323.35 323.35 600.03 600.03 626.39 626.39 704.13 704.13 788.29 788.29 0.00 0.00 45.29 45.29 24.73 24.73 118.45 118.45 134.57 134.57 48.38 48.38 246.39 246.39 276.37 276.37 Page 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 +52.87 0 +60.00 Total • • orig_surface Total orig_surface Total orig_surface Total 821.53 821.53 878.45 878.45 5369.16 5369.16 Tit print.txt 85.56 85.56 224.46 224.46 1204.20 1204.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C.A v a 1 UYhe coy pyd- 1204 t QG1 = 214-‘; c'j. •PY 6,32 �r�ct r; 4-5� oftukwila CITY OF jUKWIL RECEIPT inter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel! KJ 1)CD . 325.00 Add re' CHECK 325.00 'S TUKW Suite i Appli� 01/03/02 16 ) SALEEM 04:53 0097 2250. RECEIPT Permit Number: E02-001 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 01/02/2002 Issue Date: Receipt No.: K020000002 Payment Amount: Initials: NG Payment Date: User ID: 1141 Balance: 325.00 01/02/2002 11:40 AM $0.00 Payee: ADC CONSTRUCTION TRANSACTION LIST: Amount Type Method Description Payment Check 3089 325.00 ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Account Code Current Pmts SEPA 000/345.831 325.00 Total: 325.00 2250 01/03 0716 TOTAL 325.00 doc: Receipt Printed: 01 -02 -2002 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community De DeiguyilippiENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAm — 2 2002 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA Planner: ,b File Number: E O —b c 1 I Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: K N ckE51 D FNCF LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. Macud.Q Ro ;1 15 2 3449 /4? ( Parcel 14-) Quarter: 5 E Section: I:5 Township: 33 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: f7�'� Address: fed / /7V 4 n L ' Phone:(a.S..stJ 6 6 - y 7 11 FAX: `K—(1-7 0)-7 ' 53 -60c0 - tiI99 Signature: G: \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: O,/ —Da _0)- • Date: I 3 of City of Tulip ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Applicant Name: IYN'6hq rrw Set feP r-n Street Address: 2iS °5 vg City, State, Zip: LYNNi_b wfl 9$03, Telephone: '325 - 9 3/-4 g 63 DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. FIECENED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN -2NU PERMIT CENTER January 25, 2001 1 City of Tula ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06; Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 ear ontinue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. ON )Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. et Continue to Question 6 -0 - YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 2 . Part A (continued) City of Tulip ESA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new Lawn .or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT. may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. C, Y0- Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 City of Tukz ESA Screening Checklist . Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) c�E ontinue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. 'Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. 60 Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 ■ 4 • City of Tuki ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. GiD Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. giii)- Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. (Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 • City of Tula ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 6 Please, respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: <HA A/ tDENCE 2. Name of Applicant: ,%ffohc, m, cl goat 3. Date checklist prepared: VAID I 4. Agency requesting checklist: ukwila- 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): S 2oo Z 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NQ 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. +lave 8u;14, : PeYvv‘it Pe /' G:,APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Agency fimpsets CITY OF TUKWILA JAN m22 2 PERMIT CENTER • 1 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Qk; ld i "1- Pt(vv.* U1vi(v 4 coil 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Prof iS 7 CAr\s1Y4(Lt (51 )e iv\ h 1— 10*. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. t-0c4+i' °v : r3$ X ()%c dr,w. Rd NYce I 15 21049 WI 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No G. N +PPHANV.ANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 2 and to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. ponces: smENTAL ELEMENTS General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Sire P sloPeS Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 4-o SLAP c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. CJG. - oy ,.ve! d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. -TIN, 's heev\ ls.6eck A:0; Pi PYef*Y c . yvAew-d 61- e r' - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cad A: feS w! be 4!'wY , {l 2i! 45 - C t2r 6'32 C CI' i to Q_crarvtada.P ho veGt.kk� CG1tS G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APPASEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 - 3 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. 6resl'" ( ( OC(uV c likt t C V ot\ / 6v,-t ((ley Mee, ve' 641 / bQ Me K -tb ev∎SL.y-e comp1fel e Stcmdct s •u, its About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 20 °% apPvol,„ ;fiell . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: K11 Cp uvoit coAro1 stihdlqfdl. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Tl/ere i Soi'-e dud e rh /sslosn,s - al 0' b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.AP■SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 4 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: W1 it try r f;m1't ofusi r4 A) wale' pxr;odicq I f a S x C�v4�� tQReS Pl�� 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or - removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that wQuld be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. G: W PPHAMLANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 5 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Ato b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No Agency Comments G: VAPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 6 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: /VorQ c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. the souvct t V tA_Y\o -f r i S - r'vN, 3ite. °1"t(q. C1.1urt✓ tut' It ,£ Cov\J%co( to f t tfCiS�l�q Cov.JQy9v�C2 s�S r� gpprDpi tcc osro.\ cart 1vvo( e , Wgtey c 4411 rAel hods -Fri 7k K1, (ct.i "I) Suv CP Uititi ✓ 4/1a ytaf will bP q pP1 °Pi 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 1� d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: "T-in 1(ou:)1. ' U 5-e o-�' L— f 41—f S �/ A. cJ-{c�c �2 �q IMS ► i o , It -Ce v\C� �M ( G Yoi4 . 5/-4, l � G:W PPHANV .ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC,.06/16/00 ' 7 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. .Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Tie Sr'"Q; Lai t I b c ie4rfct cye Shr11bS P, Sorr,e tvicel 4S Shou1U. n.., -the_ trce. fjgv, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nom d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A lgv■lscgtt Oic.hi P /4n Py veiled Agency Comments G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 8 ecid tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Tie Sr'"Q; Lai t I b c ie4rfct cye Shr11bS P, Sorr,e tvicel 4S Shou1U. n.., -the_ trce. fjgv, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Nom d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A lgv■lscgtt Oic.hi P /4n Py veiled Agency Comments G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 8 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Ai9 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. '1`hedC_ wi lefty L c eQS hop 12(90s Agency Comments G: MPPHANV.ANDUSE.APPNSEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16100 9 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: AI oyAL, 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. A/07% e_ 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: NA- G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 10 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ? "Mere EA.)/ (. �+ of Ie$ u i!Ome4'" uic► ^C®✓ ells q km- itioy► 4. hn64 s ea..4hd411o1^ C.b YPle pa vS 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The re w,' It bf low Ie,e ( of Kai s.e. -y- a s Ito✓ dVet :9 • 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: no A 1Vl 4 s kor t- Posy LI-L , 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? filn So r►■.P is cti vveAft ham., A ✓lc..41_ .' ,' rheve. &Ye b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. G: IAPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 11 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. T H e ye_ 4 Ye, Y Y 7 $ t r t •t d t - A V e C ®+n S i t e ' H w 't Ut''✓ -f'Ine M1 . nit_ StahiS feadi LAP 15 t- *)kei? -f-Int e tS� rt� h0,4 [ n / !� d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? /6 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? D12, f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If^^a�� licable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? !V� h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. G:\ APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 12 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Two Si lt £ynl' 1) howt_es c p NY i' �e {c/ 6 PeoPlt j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Aiovve k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: wllt t-402 i to pat- •f1ratnn- tit C./ 41 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? 2 low to Ali ° 1 k ''h eO t_ 5fr JL 4{14,411(1 ha.,r�$ G :WPPHANU.ANDUSE.APPSEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 13 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 25- fc.d- 1 3 Z feet. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ivA G: W PPHAN\LANDUS E. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 14 Agency Comments • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Noe Agency Comments b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NA 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? G:\APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 15 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NA 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /A G:\ APPHATALANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 16 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access _to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. -- PAC■CAd4 vvk Poovi is Pc so k A CC t S S 'e-av b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NA c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? tkAD SP4C.QS 4CUdf(A' d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). J(% acid r i-1 o>^a j rood i moo tkime,it *. o f V ed . e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No G: WPPHAN,LANDUSE.APPSSEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 17 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. AtA- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: system other: ty, gas, 4,0 refuse service, to ne, s sewer, septic G: APPHANU.ANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 18 Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on -the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. . we_ w ■1 i oiktua wteS tb Koo kup 1`o u I i tf eS a 1v Pa� a yet (et it e5) C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 414.404401 Date Submitted: 11/01101 (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). G: APPHAMLANDUSE.APPSEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 19 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Nc g AV t mPt4\ 2. 9 irtVe wtl lt). fAome., Cc>"S 14' 3 (Z Y' STS p `!i ✓tilt Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: AIA- • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Tv e - w1 I 1 he_ e_1cer vly, , ?Aj/0I Veil mh p i'°,i0 e✓ey 4 laV A rppe five hi'l -t-- P14YVE- sui4vy't {mil. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: R- La vY,A cgpe !q-rckrted P kikt -ear cif tri y'eV /PC,.J G: WPPHANILANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 20 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Agency Comments Proposed measures to protector conserve energy and natural resources are: NAY 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No svnppci-s Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? /Yo / Vile G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APPSEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 21 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. �ovt • G: APPHAN\ LANDUSE .APPVSEPAAPP.DGC.06 /16/00 22 Agency Comments • �( RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA JAN - 2 2002 PERMIT CENTER SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HERETO ANNEXED AND MADE A PART OF THIS GUARANTEE, AND SUBJECT TO THE FURTHER EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION THAT NO GUARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABILITY ASSUMED WITH RESPECT TO THE IDENTITY OF ANY PARTY NAMED OR REFERRED TO IN SCHEDULE A OR WITH RESPECT TO THE VALIDITY, LEGAL EFFECT OR PRIORITY OF ANY MATTER SHOWN THEREIN. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. TESTWARE 29620 235TH AVE. S.E. BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010 Attn: SHELDS Y 2/1 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE CO. 14450 NE 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 980073697 COUNTERSIGNED: Order No. H907187 Customer No. -- By: 5) 646-3515 TROY StGEORGE - (42 FAX (425) 646 -3517 SCHEDULE A Limited Liability Guarantee Liability: $250.00 Premium: 21.50 Tax: Total: $271.50 1. Name of Assured: TESTWARE 2. Date of Guarantee: MARCH 5, 2001 The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: That, according to the public records relating to the following described land: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" A. Title to the AIAAtINTERNATIONAL SVENTURES, land INC., adescribed Washingt e is on vested i n vested corporation pursuant to the following deed: STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED recorded under King County Recording No. 20001201000799 B. The estate or interest in the land described above is: Fee Simple C. There are no taxes or assessments, mortgages or deeds of trust, real estate contracts, judgment liens, state or federal tax liens, or other monetary title to the land, other than EXCEPTIONS: 1. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, aft delinquency: (1st half delinquent, May 1; 2nd half delinquent, November 1) Tax Account No. Year Billed 322920- 0005 -00 2001 $504.67 Page 2 Paid $0.00 Balance $504.67 EXCEPTIONS Order No. H907187 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: $504.67 Levy Code: 2413 Assessed Value Land: $35,000.00 Assessed Value Improvements: $ 0.00 AFFECTS: Said premises and other property 2. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is .0178, City of Tukwila. NOTE 1: Evidence and authority of the officers of AIA INTERNATIONAL VENTURES, INC., a Washington corporation, to execute the forthcoming instrument should be submitted. NOTE 2: The current property address is not available at this time. NOTE 3: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. PTN OF GOVT LOT 1 SEC 15 TWN 23N RNG 4E BSK /cgg The following matters are also excluded from the coverage of this guarantee: 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c), or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupance or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. No guarantee is made nor is liability assumed regarding (a) matters affecting the beneficial interest of any mortgage or deed of trust or other matter shown as an exception, (b) other matters which may affect any such mortgage, deed of trust or other matter shown as an exception, (c) the identity of any party named or referred to in an exception, or (d) with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. Page 3 Order No. H907187 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Beginning at the corner of Government Lot 1, Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; thence south 89 °56'42.5" east along the south line of said lot 270 feet; thence north 57 °41'12" east 362.11 feet to the southwesterly margin of the county road; thence northerly along said road margin 61.96 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 54 °49'42" west 100.25 feet; thence north 31 °08'30" west 45 feet; thence northeasterly to a point on westerly margin of said county road which is 50 feet from true point of beginning; thence south 31 °08'30" east 50 feet to the true point of beginning; (BEING Lot 2, Block 1 of Hellwig's Addition to Foster, unrecorded); Page 4 nts s:tc_.. :.i provtcec. L ^c .. _'ar,e, v- your ...:or;'lacor.. s ::cc .o snow a =. aTe;s ._:acre co ti-le p.roeer:, .nciuet:,;, Our noc ltmtG°e :o. a;ra. c: ensions. easeme.^.cs. _^ :;ox :..eaa._ar tocanort of .zouncar:es• ..:s aoc a _;arz o ;, nor :ices is modify, ::.e corrmtcaenc or colic: co wntc^ tc S aczac ee. " .= company assur.:es NO LL ABIL: i Y For any ma=r rr:ace co Geis R'.r — c. l zurat` sc::'vev for �wu inrormacon. iii ... :�� S i� Olt G ..� a�..:o an ac..... .,,. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non - judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured ": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land ": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage ": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records ": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date ": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and.all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations Form 2015 -1 (Rev. 12- 15 -95) obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitutethe basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED ON BACK COVER / AIA Inter natipnal intutee L ";Inc 3 "W 24719 43rd' Avenue S'' / Kent, WA 980321 llll i I II Illl ill l ,l II II 11 1, I0IIII� Il, � lI I IlI, II I jI ll I I III I I 1111111 UPI 1201% IIIIjI 1II I1111 I 1'111111111i I1,I ill I II iI' KING cQUNfi1al Riter E1790000 K2/41/�000 „1041 SAAB .wv PAGE 001 OF 002 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE,INSORANCE COMPANY OF PHILADRLPHIA • REP STATUTORY"F;WARRANTY DEED RE =:,,Esorow Noy .:= 92.833, Title Order No H904087 Legal Description / PTN of.;,SE 1/4 SE 1/4 STR 15 -23 -4 AND PTN Assessor's Tax Parcel I' D. No/15G304-9149-05 091) C✓?�rtni THE GRANTOR Joan Brown ,, geraonal'Rapreaentative for The Estate of Mabel Clark, deceased for and in consideration of Ten'bollaxa'($ 0 0.0)""`and other valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys':„and warrants to'' , AIA International Ventures, Inc., a washiflgton:'corporotion the following described real estate, situated in.:.the'Cdunty of KING, State of Washington See "EXHIBIT A” attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof Dated November 30, 2000 State of Washington County of RING '-v Brown, Personal Representative I certify that I ktiow or`hava satisfactory evidence that Joan Brown is the parson who appeared befor's po and said person(s) acknowledged that ha /4l55' signed this instrument., on /oeth`aa:tated -that he,ep is authorised to execute the instrument and acknoailedgsd it.ad the Person 1 Re reaentative of The Estate of Mabel Brown, deceased,to bu t•e_ • party for the uses and purpoiee: Dated, 11/30/00 LPB - 10 CIibPDF - www.fastio.corn lio•a lo, d voluntary act of such / instrument. P or the State of Washington R. ding at Xing/County; , My appointment expires /2/20/2002/'11 , (Pdrm S71) • / PARCEL A /Beginning at the northwest corner of the southeast quarter of 7 Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W M , in King County;. Washington, f(then'be;sputh 87°48'32" east along the north line of said isubdiVition270, feet, t,henceinortn159°*92.2" east 250.35 feet to the true point of begOhin94 /p.7 thence,contifluing ft5;rtti 59°49'22" east 111 75 feet to the westerly-Marsinbf,..ctUnty road; thence south/40°2 .61,25'east alwig said westerly margin of county road,' 6.0 feet/if thence south 644,46'25"/West/II3.03 feet, thenoe, north 40°20'25" west pSraliel to said westerly margin of cOunty road, 50 feet to'the'Ntrue, 'DOM of beginning, e - PARCELiE! Heginm,ng at, the corner of GovernMent Lot 1, Section 15, Township 23/North'. Range 4 East, W M , in King County, Washingtohl- „.„ thence south 89°56,1'45" east along the south line of said lot 270 feet %—, thence north 57.°,41/1,2"/eAsi11 feet to the southwesterly margin of the cOunty,-road',,,7 thence northerly diong1sa34;road Margin 61.96 feet to the true point of beginning, thence south 54°49'42" West'. lop .25 feet,,„ thence north 31°08'30" west,r45 fet CT thence northeasterly to a point Ori_we‘teklyrnArgAn of said county road which is 50 feet from,trUe pointz.of4beginning; thence south 31°0830" east 50 feettbtheitTu/Point of •=2 beginning, / / / c= (BEING Lot 2, Block 1 of Hellwig's Additiontp Foster, unrecorded), CNI ALSO beginning at the southwest corner of Government Lot 1, Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W M , in King County, Washington, c• thence north 89°56'42" east along the south line of said lot 270 feet, thence north 57°4112 5" east 362 11 feet to the southwesterly margin of the county road, thence northeasterly „along said road margin 12.01 feet to the northwesterly margin(Of an alley and the true point of beginning, running thence south/57?'41,"12.5" west 100 81 feet, thence north 31000"/Webt 45 feet, thence northeasterly-10.0125feet to a point on said margin of the county road 49,„2,5.....feet hereon: northwesterly of the true point of beginning; ' --- thence southeasterly a1ongisaid/rbadimargin-0.95 feet to the true point of beginning; ,J, / / /—t 4/ TOGETHER WITH that portion of ated ci ailejacent which would attach by operation of law / ,/, --, END OF:EXHIBIT "A-1" 95 ClibPDF - www.fastio.corn NOV -02 -01 12:59 FROM:HWA G CIENCES INC November 2, 2001 HWA Project No. 2001186 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 -2599 Attention: Ms. Joanna Spencer Subject: GEOTECHNICAL PEER REVIEW KHAN RESIDENCE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Dear Ms. Spencer, ID:42577 714 1, PAGE 2/5 rfrt Ue HWAGEOSCIENCES INC • 19730 -04TH AVE. W., SUITE 200 LYNNW000, WA 98036-5957 TEL. 425 -774 -0106 FAX. 425- 774 -2714 www.hwsgcoscionCO$.co m NOV 0 2 2001 Pv zILY, WV/` V1 /0 As requested, we have prepared a peer review of a geotechnical report for a proposed residential development located at a current address of 13821 Macadam Road in Tukwila, Washington. Our work was conducted in general accordance with our proposal P-4482 dated September 26, 2001, and consisted of a site reconnaissance, review of project documents submitted to us by the City of Tukwila, and review of relevant sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The project involves development of three residential properties situated on three separate building lots west of and adjacent to Macadam Road and southwest of S 138th Street in Tukwila, Washington. The proposed development will consist of site grading, and construction of driveways, iciailuug ,�aiis, and three residential houses. The site is located entirely within Class 2 and Class 3 Sensitive Areas as classified and mapped by the City of Tukwila. PROJECT DOCUMENTS We received the following project - related documents from the City of Tukwila: • Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated May 25, 2001, by LSI ADAPT; • Geotechnical Supplement No. 1- On -Site Storm Water Infiltration, dated July 2, 2001, by LSI ADAPT; • Geotechnical Supplement No. 2 — Retaining Wall Design, dated August 16, 2001, by LSI ADAPT; • Set of plans consisting of: site, grading, erosion control, and tree plans, and wall profiles, prepared by the developer and stamped by the Tukwila Public Works on August 20, GEOLOGY GEOENVIRONMFNTAL SERVICES HYDROGEOLOGY GE01ECNNICAL CNGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION NOV -02 -01 12 =S9 FROM .HWA C iii .CIENCES 1NC: November 2, 2001 HWA Project No. 2001186 2001; and • Copies of relevant parts of the 1990 Tukwila Sensitive Area Maps and Legend. SITE RECONNAISSANCE We visited the site on November 1, 2001, and our observations are in general agreement with those provided by LSI ADAPT in their geotechnical engineering report and supplements. However, the report states the maximum slope inclination on the site to be 2H: 1V (horizontal to vertical). We noted that the existing slope in the northwestern part of Lot No. 2 possibly exceeded this listed maximum inclination. Our observations were confirmed by the topographic information on the site plans which indicates an inclination as high as 4H:3V. PROJECT PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS We conceptually reviewed the geotechnical engineering report and its two supplements prepared by LSI ADAPT, and the project site plans prepared by the developer. The report contains descriptions of the project site, proposed development, and geotechnical investigation conducted. It also provides conclusions and recommendations pertaining to the site preparation, foundation design and construction, temporary and permanent drainage, below -grade backflll walls, and structural fill. The geotechnical supplements 1 and 2 address the on -site storm water infiltration and retaining wall design, respectively. The site plans show the proposed locations of the residential structures, driveways, and retaining walls, as well as the proposed site grading, erosion control, and tree removal plans, and the proposed retaining wall profiles. Upon the review, we are in general agreement with the project document findings, conclusions and recommendations; however, we found the following deficiencies: • As mentioned in the Site Reconnaissance section, the geotechnical report fails to ?.,:knowleig° the existing slopes exceeding 2H:1V as noted during our site visit and confirmed by the topographic survey data. Furthermore, page 6 of the report erroneously equates the inclination of 2H:1V with the 25 percent grade change, whereas that inclination corresponds to a grade change of 50 %. The survey information indicates the maximum slope gradient reaching 4H:3V, or 75 %. • The geotechnical report recommends all permanent cut slopes be not steeper than 2H:1V. However, the site grading plan shows the toe of the steep slope in the northwestern part of Lot No. 2 being altered to an inclination as high as 1 H:1 V (100 %) because of close proximity of the proposed house location. In our opinion, such alteration of the sensitive area slope could potentially compromise stability of the slope and trigger slope failure. Furthermore, this is in violation of the Tukwila Municipal Code (Ordinance 1758 §1(part), 1995). To conform to the Code requirements, the location of the house should 2001 186PccrRcview 2 HWA GEOSCIENCFS 1NC. rtbv- e2 -I01 1 :i = 1010 r'<url : thwm 1,a J1.. 1 L1Vl.LJ 1ltV 11.0 ..2G0 ! iii, L z rnLSG `!/ J November 2, 2001 HWA Project No. 2001186 be moved such that the slope does not require cuts or, alternatively, a retaining structure should be constructed at the toe of the cut slope. • The setback of the proposed house foot print location from the Class 3 Sensitive Area slope on Lot No.2 as shown on the plans also violates the mirimurr_ set't-1:.': requirement of the Code. Consequently, the proposed location of the house or the house dimensions should be adjusted to meet the Code requirement. Alternatively, the geotechnical report should demonstrate that the currently proposed setback could be exempt from the code requirement. • As noted by the Tukwila Public Works, the proposed location of the driveway parallel to Macadam Rd S and the Segmental Retaining Wall supporting it has to be adjusted to meet the setback from property line requirement. • The on site soils are predominantly fine - grained with high fines content. These soils are highly moisture - sensitive. The report fails to address earthwork in wet weather conditions. We are of the opinion that wet weather earthwork should be avoided on this site when possible. Specific recommendations pertaining to drainage, erosion control, and materials handling should be provided for times when work in wet weather cannot be avoided. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our assessment, we conclude that the lots are suitable for the planned development and slope stability on the subject and adjacent lots will not be detrimentally influenced by the development, provided the project documents satisfactorily address the above - listed deficiencies and that recommendations given in the revised geotechnical report are followed. Our review was conceptual in nature only and we recommend an additional review when design of the residential structures and retaining wall is finalized. 0'O We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us. 20011R6PccrRcvicw 3 HWA GEoSCIENCEs INC. August 16, 2001 ADAPT Project No. WA01 -6267-0 . �_ AIA International Development 306 North 1w Avenue Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Saraj Khan Subject: Geotechnical Supplement No. 2 — Retaining Wall Design Hellwig's Addition Lots No. 1, 2 & 149 13821 Macadam Road Tukwila, Washington Dear Saraj: • ADaPT DECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FE •1 802 PERMIT CENTER At your request, LSI ADAPT, Inc. (ADAPT) is pleased to submit this geotechnical design package for the proposed Segmental Retaining Walls (SRW) at the above referenced project site. Our engineering review and design was based on general subsurface conditions obtained from borings advanced as a part of our previous and current geotechnical engineering studies for the site. Our work has been performed in general accordance with the scope of work identified in our Proposal For Additional Services (dated July 19, 2001). Written authorizathion was provided by facsimile on July 20, 2001. This letter supplements the conclusions and recommendations presented in our Geotechnical Engineering Report for the subject . project dated May 25, 2001. This geotechnical engineering evaluation has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of AIA International Development, and their agents, for specific application to the planned project and site. Use or reliance upon this report by a third is at their own risk. ADAPT does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to ADAPT. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 13821 Macadam Road in Tukwila, Washington. The site consists of three vacant building lots measuring approximately 50 by 100 feet, identified as Lots No. 1 & 2 within Block 1 and Lot No. 149 on the west side of Macadam Road. The proposed house construction has been changed from a 2 -level basement design to slab -on -grade first floor with an access driveway supported by a Segmental Retaining Wall (SRW) situated on the lower slope along Macadam Road. In addition, an SRW wall is proposed at the west end of the house on Lot No. 149 to provide a level backyard area. The 800 Maynard Avenue South Suite 403 Seattle, Washington 98134 • LSI ADAPT, Inc. Tel (206)-654-7045 Fax (206) 654 -7048 www.adaptengr.com LSI ADAPT, Inc. enclosed Site & Exploration Plan (Figure 2A) illustrates the proposed changes, as well as the layout of the houses to be constructed. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this letter are based on our understanding of the currently proposed layout of the project site, as derived from layout drawings, written information, and verbal information supplied to us. Consequently, if any changes are made in the currently proposed project, we may need to modify our conclusions and recommendations contained herein to reflect those changes. We recommend that ADAPT be retained to review final construction drawings and perform field observations during construction, in order to address any deviations that may become evident during the final design and construction phases of this project. EXPLORATORY METHODS In order to assess the soil conditions in previously unexplored areas on the lower slope, we performed a hand - excavated test hole at the location of the critical (highest) portion of the proposed wall. Our test hole was advanced and logged by an ADAPT geotechnical engineer using a hand auger and/or a shovel. Our representative also collected a representative soil sample which was stored in a watertight container and later transported to the laboratory for further visual examination and testing. After the test hole was completed,' we backfiilled it with excavated soils and tamped the surface. A test hole log (HB-1) describing the subsurface conditions encountered is attached to this letter. Practical excavation refusal was encountered at a depth of about 10.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) due to the presence of coarse gravel. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Based on our previous borings, the site soils generally consist of interlayered medium stiff to stiff sandy silt, clayey silt and loose to medium dense silty sands, above a stiff to a basal soil unit consisting of very stiff clayey silt / silt with clay. Our hand- excavated boring on the lower slope generally confirmed the previously mapped stratigraphy. Locally perched groundwater was observed atop the clayey silt and silt with clay soil units in our borings within the upper slope portions of the site. The enclosed Generalized Geologic Cross Section A A' illustrates the subsurface conditions at the site. LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES As a part of our geotechnical evaluation, we performed a series of Atterberg Limit tests, Materials Finer than U.S. No. 200 Sieve tests (200 Wash), and Moisture Content determinations. The results of these laboratory tests are presented on the enclosed laboratory test reports and were used to evaluate soil parameters for engineering evaluation and were used to develop soil classifications shown on the exploration logs. An Atterberg limits test indicates the moisture contents of a cohesive soil at the limits of plastic and liquid behavior, which is used to classify and index cohesive soils (ASTM:D - 4318). A general grain size analysis (ASTM:D -422) indicate the range of soil particle diameters included in a particular sample, while a 200 wash (ASTM:C -117) indicates how much fines (silt and clay) that is AIA International Development ADAPT Project No. WA01 -6267-0 August 16, 2001 Page 2 LSI ADAPT, Inc. contained in a sample. Moisture content determinations were made in general accordance with ASTM:D -2216. The results of these laboratory tests are presented on the enclosed laboratory test reports. ENGINEERING ANALYSES We performed internal and external stability calculations of the proposed SRW walls (greater than 4 feet high) using the AB Walls 2000 (Allan Block Wall) design software. For the lower SRW wall along the proposed driveway, we performed global stability analyses using the Slope/W computer program An iterative approach was used to provide the reinforcing grid spacing and grid length, while maintaining adequate static and seismic safety factors with respect to both internal and external global stability. A general discussion and the results of the analyses performed are provided in the sections below. Global Slope Stability Considerations In order to evaluate the global stability of the proposed SRW wall along the lower slope area, we used Slope/W to perform slope stability analyses along the most critical (highest wall section) point of the wall, corresponding to Cross Section A -A'. The results of the stability are expressed as a factor of safety, which is computed as the ratio of the forces resisting slope failure to the gravitational forces tending to cause a slope failure. Based on our field and laboratory analyses, the behavior of the fine - grained site soils are borderline between non plastic (sandy silt, silt) and cohesive (clayey silt, silt with clay). For the purpose of slope stability analysis, non plastic soils are generally modelled using effective stress analysis (friction angle), while cohesive soils are normally modelled using undrained shear strength (cohesion). Given the interlayered and borderline characteristic of the fine - grained site soils, we have analyzed for both conditions. For the static case, our analyses indicate a safety factor of 13 or greater against potential, deep - seated slope failure of the proposed lower slope wall. A pseudo-static analysis was performed to evaluate a potential seismic loading case, assuming an average horizontal ground acceleration of 0.15 g, which is about half of the anticipated peak horizontal ground acceleration and in accordance with generally accepted local practice. The factor of safety against slope failure due to the surcharge loading under seismic conditions is on the order of 1.1 or greater. These safety factors are generally considered to provide an adequate safety margin against slope instability by the geotechnical engineering community. Representative printouts from our Slope/W computer analyses are enclosed with this report, including the assumed soil profile and estimated critical failure circles for the minimum (critical) safety factor in the static and seismic cases, respectively. SRW Wall Design The internal and external reinforced wall stability was evaluated using the Allan Block design software for both the static and seismic case. Representative SRW sections of varying wall heights were evaluated with appropriate backslope angles and traffic surcharge loadings applicable to each section. It should be noted that the traffic loading was modelled using 250 pounds per square foot (psf) pressure, which is generally accepted for general roadway traffic. Although the proposed driveway vehicle loading is expected to be relatively light, we have used the general traffic loading criteria to allow for the AIA International Development ADAPT Project No. WA01 -6267-0 August 16, 2001 Page 3 LSI ADAPT, Inc. occasional heavy vehicle loading associated with construction traffic and delivery trucks. We used a 3 degree wall face batter in our analysis, to be on the conservative side. This would allow a less steep wall face without additional engineering review, should this be desired for cosmetic reasons. It should be noted that longer geogrid layers are .required on the uppermost block rows to resist the anticipated seismic lateral loading. In the seismic case, we have discounted the traffic surcharge loading, to avoid duplication of low - probability risk factors (generally assumed not to occur at the same time). Printouts of the AB wall design, including plan, elevation and section views, are enclosed with this letter. Backup calculation sheets are included with the AB Wall printouts. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed SRW walls are considered feasible, provided that the design elements and recommendations provided in this letter are incorporated into the final design and construction. The information provided in this supplementary letter should only be used in conjunction with our Geotechnical Engineering Report for the subject site. The conclusions and recommendations provided in this letter are based, in part, on our limited review of available geotechnical documents for the project site, and our interpretations and assumptions regarding subsurface conditions; therefore, if any changes to the existing site conditions are observed at a later time, ADAPT should be contacted to review those changes and modify our geotechnical evaluation, if needed. AIA International Development ADAPT Project No. WA01 -6267-0 /August 16, 2001 Page 4 LSI ADAPT, Inc. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to you. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, or if we can assist you further, please contact us at 206-654-7045. Respectfully submitted, LSI ADAPT, Inc. Rolf B. yllseth, .E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Kurt W. Groesch, P.E. Senior Reviewer Enclosures: Figure 2A - Site & Exploration Plan Hand Boring Log BB-1 Previous Boring Log B-3 Atterberg Limits Test Report (1 pg) Materials Finer Than U.S. No. 200 Sieve Report (1 pg) Moisture Content Determination Report (lpg) Generalized Geologic Cross Section A -A' (Slope/W Input Profile, 1 pg) SlopeIW Slope Stability Printouts for Lower SRW Wall: - Undrained Analysis, static & seismic F.S. (2 pgs) - Effective Stress Analysis (normally consolidated), static & seismic F.S. (2 pgs) AB Walls 2000 Design for Wall 1, along Macadam Road: - Elev. & Plan View, Materials Worksheet, 13 Sections (36 pgs) AB Walls 2000 Design for Wall 2, backyard on Lot No. 149: - Elev. & Plan View, Materials Worksheet, 13 Sections (17 pgs) Distribution: AIA International Development (1) Attn: Mr. Saraj Khan Mohammad Saleem (2) AIA International Development ADAPT Project No. WA01 -6267-0 August 16, 2001 Page 5 ist • ADaPT July 2, 2001 LSI ADAPT Project No. WA01- 6267 -0 AIA International Development 306 North 1' Avenue Kent, Washington 98032 Attention: Mr. Saraj Khan Subject: Geotechnical Supplement No. 1— On -Site Storm Water Infiltration Hellwig's Addition Lots No. 1, 2 & 149 13821 Macadam Road Tukwila, Washington Dear Saraj: As requested, LSI ADAPT, Inc. (ADAPT) are pleased to submit this letter addressing the suitability of on -site storm water infiltration on the project site referenced above. The additional engineering review and letter was requested by Mr. Mohammad Saleem on June 22, 2001. This letter supplements the conclusions and recommendations presented in our Geotechnical Engineering Report for the subject project dated May 25, 2001. We understand that the City of Tukwila requires on -site infiltration of storm water if favorable site soil infiltration conditions exist at the site. The borings advanced as a part of our geotechnical study revealed the site soil conditions to generally consist of surficial, medium stiff sandy silts and silty fine sands overlying stiff to very stiff silt and clayey silt. Based on the observed soil conditions and generally accepted infiltration characteristics of fine- grained soils (sandy silts, clayey silts, etc), it is our opinion that the site surface and subsurface conditions are not favorable for the use of on -site infiltration systems, primarily for the following reasons: • Based on the soil classification performed as a part of our geotechnical report, the fine - grained site soils would be classified as Hydrologic Soil Type C or D (Silt Loam or Clay Loam, based on the USDA Soil Texture Class). These soil types are typically associated with infiltration rates of 60 min/inch, or Less. Such low infiltration rates are generally not considered favorable for infiltration systems. 800 Maynard Avenue South Suite 403 Seattle, Washington 98134 LSI ADAPT, Inc. Tel (206) -654 -7045 Fax (206) 654 -7048 www.adaptengr.com • • LSI ADAPT • The proposed building sites are located near the top of existing steep slopes (Class 2 and Class 3 Areas). Soil infiltration systems are generally avoided close to the top of slopes to minimize the risk of adversely affecting the stability of the slope area. In fact, we typically recommend to minimize surface infiltration into the subsoils near the top of slopes by channelling surface water flow and providing good surface drainage. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service on this project. Should you have any questions concerning this letter, or if we can assist you further, please contact us at 206 - 654 -7045. Respectfully submitted, LSI ADAPT, Inc. Rolf B. yllseth, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Distribution: AIA International Development (1) Attn: Mr. Saraj Khan Mohammad Saleem (2) AIA International Development LSI ADAPT Project No. WA01- 6267 -0 July 2, 2001 Page 2 '5 q 0 a 5E 15 -y M 0 /5 N 88 - 27-57 7/ )4.33‹ 376 :68 0 0 O- Lot 2 O� d��' '\ co o ' Yv Co 0 64 ■ Q Z•12 (s ?) - 84-58 -o &E Lot 1 0 J Cr w 1- tn 0 tL z w 0 w 1- 0) _qo fr W W VI I 273 L h .I 1 \I a I /1.--- —Thcp, ..--. fry IE- '� UV 3339 01V- 91• -• s O 0 Zoo a /¢d 1 so t 'i90 a a w IAN\ 0 .r 0 0 a - +a w ; \h to N")' 1� O Ito • NJ i fBO 60 vs ,, - ' \ n- O til(` 000300° .s 9 +55 To^ N87••5 /F c 310± (sp) cS■ f,•2, 2.57 8 STEPHEN FOSTER D.L.C. N0: 38 v h 5 21 Ob 6.8o 7c7 0140 sz� ,_ 0 X s-aoorr \o° 0190 o2 � o O Vim. } y 50.28 2 p3 1 In 7 X4 ‘4,',, 25 ob3 T H> E RONH©VDE ARCHITECTS L L C 6625 5. 190th St. Sults B-IO5 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 656-0500 • FAX (425) 656-0501 rontavdearchitec-41 r PROP 0 0. 106 LOT -Acr- ± Sq. f-. EXISTING HOUSE FOUNDATION 513 Sq. ft. ± EXISTING TREE TABLE z a- Awe? I to- ALDER rawer .. a r ALDER r ALDER 7.. n- ALDER :.. . a 6• ALODP 9.. /o -ALDER - 1Q' 24• ALDER .. II.. 6- ALDER 12. 24• FDP. - - 13. 20- f R r4. re" Flier 11 ro- PINE ra LO' POE 17.-16- ALDER (2MAW PROPO8D . • U FOOTPripT ! J CRY OFTUKWIA APR 2 6 =2 PERMIT CENTER a 6 - 26. . 12 "ALDER- 27. 12•AIOER.... . 2a 10- ALDER 29. 24- ALDER .T4 3J• APPLE 37. 24" ALDER J2. 24- ALDER 32 24• ALDER '. J4 - Ie- ALLC'R - ' 32. 36' ALD127 35 24" FIR 37. 12• ALDER . 34 20- INPLE SITE PLAN 6 5 4 9• 2 NO. DATE DEEGRIFTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' SST CONTENTS. SITE PLAN SITE SECTIONS PARCEL NUMBERS. LOT-149 152304 -9149 . LOT h 322920 -0010 VICINITY. MAP JOB NO.. 2002O1 DRi ra EiY.. l76 CHECKED BY.- T.R. DATE. 4/26/02 SHEET NO. AO.1 LEGEND: 0 X SET 5/8' REBAR TRAVERSE PO /NT WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT CATCH BASIN & CAP LS# 29537 30' KHAN RESIDENCE SITE ADDRESS: Macadam Road South ila, WA 98178 < DRAIN CULVERT, AS -0- UTIU7Y POLE U77L17Y POLE WI 2.0�_ f — N59'49'061-- N59'49 06 E L .1C2,255122228121 iiM=Eltp O ¢. # 5 0l=ffi 0 &C2 00 102.50' ftlin 0J. If- nderdrain Not. No asp. submi the structed eady TACT PERSON: HAMMAD SALEEM 5- 931 -6863 REOENED CITY OFTUKWgM ,DAB! - 2 2002 PERMIT CENTER KHAN RESIDENCE 165.00 160.00 155.00 150.00 145.00 WALL PROFILES 140.00. SITE ADDRESS: 138XX Macadam .Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425 -931 -6863 ... ...... .. .. 135.00 NIERLINE_ PROFILE RIGHT SIDE EXISTING GRO PROFILE 130.00 125.00 DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE EXISTING GROUND PROFILE LEFT SIDE . EXISTING GROUND PROFILE 120.00 ` 0+00 1+00 2 +00 KHAN RESIDENCE 30' c>, s 6W itiVV,3171 3U larl I t:ci tt 1 11 AM= . I WES.211 1 tat 11 VMS g . 2 t= 11 ....,-', .. . '...) .4) SITE PLAN " 120.44' 1" = 20' 411 . 4 / Piz* 4 I Mali I ftizt • 1412.7 ttZt. t 1,,U/ ,ff/ A t 0+ • 5 1 \'-''.:---r- .-lii C/AIDE'R' 41 (-)C --- t q 1; i '; .;'. ,.q L _ 6, 11.3:44' --- -t-----RE72-u..v/NG 1.1 . 1. ,....,„,,_, ::-...•\,- .,......--............ _vzsgle23-...,..,,,,, , laiti=.14.=11/3.i2=t1“4;t1naRMI4 ------------------- \". 102.50 ' I '.\ tt C't 9 ir q !! +160 1.1 98'2C SITE ADDRESS: 138XX Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425-931-6863 LEGEND: C) SET 5/8" REBAR & CAP LS/ 29537 TRAVERSE POINT WATER METER G. FIRE HYDRANT 71 CATCH BASIN < DRAIN CULVERT, AS SHOWN -0- UTILITY POLE 4; 0 UTILITY POLE WITH STREET LIGHT GRADING PLAN " 20' CINDER KHAN RESIDENCE SITE ADDRESS: 138)0( Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425-931-6863 Cut Volume = 2,145 cubic yards Fill Volume = 6.32 cubic yards LEGEND: • SET 5/8 MBAR & CAP LS/ 29537 X TRAVERSE POINT Hi WATER MEIER A f7RE HYDRANT •0 CATCH BASIN DRAW CULVERT, AS SHOWN -0- U17U7Y POLE 411-4):( U77LTIY POLE WM STREET LIGHT 4 Lt;(i1;N ll: ® SET 5 /8" REBAR & CAP LSI 29537 X TRAVERSE POINT M WATER METER A FIRE HYDRANT CI . CATCH BASIN < DRAIN CULVERT. AS SHOWN -0- UTILITY POLE UTILITY POLE WITH STREET LIGHT ■ 164' ' D H EROSION CONTROL PLAN 163' 2 +00 1+80 - v.: y JROPOSED HOUS;� FOOT PR1t 60 9171 PRbJSED III SUO E 1 FOOT PRINT i 1 +40 ti 1" = 20' KHAN RESIDENCE SITE ADDRESS: 138XX Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425- 931 -6863 1 +20 0.0 '0Z0 =0. 0 ✓000 000 00 EL. 129.5 ._. a a 0 000 000 0000 is d/3 TABALIZED CONSTRUCTION \QV T ENTRAN 10''x25' ��q- Get 6c OZ 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN BMP LEGEND SF SILT FENCE SE SEEDING OHIGH VISIBILITY FENCE OUTLET PROTECTION TO TOPSOIL OC DUST CONTROL PC PLASTIC COVERING ®B CATCH BASIN /INLET PROTECTION MULCH CO CHECK DAM KHAN RESIDENCE SITE ADDRESS: 138XX Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425- 931 -6863 EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) GENERAL SEQUENCE 1. CLEARING /GRADING UMITS ARE TO BE STAKED /FLAGGED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. UMITS ARE NOT TO BE EXCEEDED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE KEPT INTACT OUTSIDE OF THE CLEARING /GRADING UMITS. 2. ESTABUSH SPECIFIED TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES (i.e. SILT FENCES, SEDIMENT TRAPS, CATCH BASIN/INLET PROTECTION) PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. MAINTAIN SPECIFIED ESC MEASURES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PERIODICALLY REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM CATCH BASIN INSERTS. SEDIMENT TRAPS. AND SILT FENCES. 4. BRING AREAS TO FINAL GRADE AND INSTALL PERMANENT ESC MEASURES (SEEDING. MULCH) AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 5. REMOVE TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES ONLY AFTER ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES HAVE BEEN STABIUZED (AT COMPLETION OF PAVING AND ESTABUSHMENT OF PERMANENT GRASS COVER). ESC NOTES 1. CLEARING /GRADING UNIT SHALL BE AT THE TOE OF ROADWAY EMBANKMENT. OR TOP OF CUT, EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. EAST OF THE INTERSECTION, CLEARING /GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO WHAT IS ONLY NECESSARY ON THE EXISTING ROADWAY SHOULDER TO PROVIDE THE NEV WIDENED ASPHALT CONCRETE AREAS. 2. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, EQUIPMENT. OR STOCKPIUNG IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE CLEARING /GRADING UMITS EXCEPT IN CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 3. CATCH BASIN /INLET (CBI) PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL EXISTING CATCH BASINS /INLETS SHOWN ON THE PUNS. PROTECTION SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN /INLET THAT PROTRUDE LESS THAN ONE INCH ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE, DRAIN SOIL SURFACES. OR OTHERWISE RECEIVE SEDIMENT — LADEN RUNOFF. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - BMP'S 1. STABILIZATION AND SEDIMENT TRAPPING SILT FENCE AND PERMANENT SEEDING 2. DEUNEATE CLEARING AND EASEMENT OMITS GRADING UMITS, TO BE FLAGGED HIGH VISIBIUTY FENCE. SURVEY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. PRESERVE VEGETATION 3. PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES DUST CONTROL, CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING, SILT FENCE. 4. TIMING AND STABILIZATION OF SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES INLET PROTECTION. GRADING. ASPHALT TREATED BASE PLACEMENT, IMMEDIATE ASPHALT PAVING, SEDIMENT TRAP 5. CUT AND FILL SLOPES MULCHING, CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING, PERMANENT SEEDING, TOPSOIL, SOD 6. CONTROLLING OFFSITE EROSION STRAW BALES. PERMANENT SEEDING. CLEAR PLASTIC COVERING 7. STABIUZATION OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND OUTLETS RIPRAP, CHECK DAMS, OUTLET PROTECTION. MULCHING AND MATTING 8. STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION. RIPRAP I 9. UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION RELOCATE AWAY FROM SENSLTIVE AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION 10. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTES MINIMIZE SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND ROUTINELY SWEEP PXy'ZD AREAS 11 REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMPS AT END OF CONSTRUCTION WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED 12 DEWATERING CONSTRUCTION SITES AS NEEDED, DIVERT TO BIOSWALE OR TANK TRUCK 13. CONTROL OF POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON CONSTRUCTION SITES USE OF BIOSWALE AND ROADSIDE DITCHES 1 14. MAINTENANCE CHECK. KEEP IN WORKING ORDER THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION 15. FINANCIAL UABIun' - -- 1 BMP LEGEND SF SILT FENCE SE SEEDING OHIGH VISIBILITY FENCE OUTLET PROTECTION TO TOPSOIL OC DUST CONTROL PC PLASTIC COVERING ®B CATCH BASIN /INLET PROTECTION MULCH CO CHECK DAM KHAN RESIDENCE SITE ADDRESS: 138XX Macadam Road South Tukwila, WA 98178 CONTACT PERSON: MOHAMMAD SALEEM 425- 931 -6863 EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) GENERAL SEQUENCE 1. CLEARING /GRADING UMITS ARE TO BE STAKED /FLAGGED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. UMITS ARE NOT TO BE EXCEEDED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. EXISTING VEGETATION SHALL BE KEPT INTACT OUTSIDE OF THE CLEARING /GRADING UMITS. 2. ESTABUSH SPECIFIED TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES (i.e. SILT FENCES, SEDIMENT TRAPS, CATCH BASIN/INLET PROTECTION) PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. MAINTAIN SPECIFIED ESC MEASURES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PERIODICALLY REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM CATCH BASIN INSERTS. SEDIMENT TRAPS. AND SILT FENCES. 4. BRING AREAS TO FINAL GRADE AND INSTALL PERMANENT ESC MEASURES (SEEDING. MULCH) AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 5. REMOVE TEMPORARY ESC MEASURES ONLY AFTER ALL EXPOSED SOIL SURFACES HAVE BEEN STABIUZED (AT COMPLETION OF PAVING AND ESTABUSHMENT OF PERMANENT GRASS COVER). ESC NOTES 1. CLEARING /GRADING UNIT SHALL BE AT THE TOE OF ROADWAY EMBANKMENT. OR TOP OF CUT, EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. EAST OF THE INTERSECTION, CLEARING /GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO WHAT IS ONLY NECESSARY ON THE EXISTING ROADWAY SHOULDER TO PROVIDE THE NEV WIDENED ASPHALT CONCRETE AREAS. 2. NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, EQUIPMENT. OR STOCKPIUNG IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE OF THE CLEARING /GRADING UMITS EXCEPT IN CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 3. CATCH BASIN /INLET (CBI) PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL EXISTING CATCH BASINS /INLETS SHOWN ON THE PUNS. PROTECTION SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED FOR PROPOSED CATCH BASIN /INLET THAT PROTRUDE LESS THAN ONE INCH ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE, DRAIN SOIL SURFACES. OR OTHERWISE RECEIVE SEDIMENT — LADEN RUNOFF.