Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E02-006 - DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS - PUBLIC FACILITIES
E02 -006 DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E02 -006 Applied: 02/14/2002 Issue Date: 04/04/2002 Status: ISSUED Proponent: VALVUE SEWER 6076. --7z , /L. . Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: A public project to install new and upgrade existing public facilities in the Duwamish neighborhood, which is generally bounded on the north and east by the Duwamish River and on the south and west by Interurban Ave. Improvements will include: new sanitary sewer (6,800 lineal feet) a sewerage lift station, replacement domestic water (4100 lineal feet) and new storm sewer facilities including catch basins, drain lines (3,200 lineal feet) and water quality vault; and street improvements consisting of curb, gutters, sidewalks in some locations, and an asphalt overlay on public streets. See the attached vicinity map and site plan. Location of Proposal: Rarer! er: /�1UL77 U face ,4i O s726W gib rth l ) Section/Township /Range: NW 10 -23 -04 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by ), The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Ps\04- ) Zoo Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21 C.075) doc: Miscperm E02 -006 Printed: 04-02 -2002 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /, 1//1 // ' HEREBY DECLARE THAT: / //617 ' 1 5. d 4�/' Notice of Public Hearing . % X/ixfiL, M1 --V /6g Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: -Di)(,(/ ZGjtd/-7L-geOt ,a 4 Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: aZ---6° Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature: f/JJ'l Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Person requesting mailing: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 4/ day of/ in the year 20'92:- ,t ,fed/t .' /4- / /f/ 2/ ` //617 ' 1 5. d 4�/' . % X/ixfiL, M1 --V /6g Project Name: -Di)(,(/ ZGjtd/-7L-geOt ,a 4 'I Project Number: aZ---6° Mailer's Signature: f/JJ'l Person requesting mailing: P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, (/lam HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing ic Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: 01 l m/la Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt. Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 = Seattle WA 98111 Other 1. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of Tin the year 200a P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: v( V J Q,(&.S'( Project Number: G-0). -'Ob lQ Mailer's Signature: P. 6o,(p7A Person requesting mailing: 01 l m/la P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM 40,KLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINEEMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( EPT OF FISHERIES & AILDLIFE SrOTIVartdiletWAYkk$: ( DEPT OF SOCIAL- & -HEALTH_SERV. o� EPaTYOF ECOLOGY;_SHORELAND:DIV aiDE_PTOF; ;ECOLOGY - SEPA- DIVISION`.. te] ( )'OFFICE OF"ATTORNEY- GENERAL ' SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT. ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( ) POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT (_) OLYMPIC PIPELINE AL,UUE SEVVER.DISTRICTj ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF_COMMERCE UGKLESHOOT_INDIAN:TRIBE= � ' ' () CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA SEATTLE TIMES SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:WDMINISTRA EFORMS \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC >111.1RIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VVVVW 050 PUBLI•OTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMIT SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: !Nail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attornev General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -past from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS\FORMS\CHKLIST.DOC Smooth Feed SheetsTM Georgina Kerr 3834 S. 116 St. Tukwila, WA 98168 :Attn: Bonnie 1.1801 40t Ave S Tukwila, WA 98168 ®AVERY® Address Labels Use template tor 5160e Charlene Travers P.O. Box 445 Talkeetna, AK 99676 Laser 5260TH • • From: Charlene Travers <ctravers3 @yahoo.com> To: Georgina Kerr <georgina -on- the - duwamish @attbi.com >, novina <novina @msn.com >, <tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, Lettie Haggard <basketdiva @msn.com >, Roger Lynn Anderson <silentapproach @hotmail.com> Date: 4/1/02 7:45AM Subject: Re: Duwamish street improvements? You all have put how I feel exactly and I agree with your statements 100 %. City Council: Please consider these my opinions also. Thanks, Charlene Travers PO Box 445 Talkeetna, AK 99676 907 - 733 -1606 - -- Georgina Kerr <georgina -on- the - duwamish @attbi.com> wrote: > Bonnie and Lettie, I totally agree with your > comments, especially about nixing the wide sidewalks > and streets (and with good reason!). We have a > casual neighborhood, as Bonnie and Lettie say. > I couldn't agree more. > - Georgina > Original Message > From: novina > To: tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us ; > tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us ; Georgina Kerr ; Lettie > Haggard > Cc: Vickywoods ; Tony & Debbie Carosino ; Teo & > Rebekah Hunter ; Rosemary @ work ; Moira Bradshaw ; > Matt Patton ; James Barnett ; Cindy & Lonnie Magee ; > Cindy & Lance Murphy ; Charlene Travers ; Catherine > "Cathie" DesJardin ; Bob Schalhamer ; Arlene ; Eric > Mathison > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 7:46 PM > Subject: RE: Duwamish street improvements? > Agree !! > I Sent a Letter to Public Works in February, with > similar views. Apparently, my opinion didn't > count. > Here is the letter again, hopefully Tukwila City > Council will not be hard of hearing, as the Public > Works seem to be. • • > > > > RE: 2002 Duwamish Street Project > concerning sidewalks > > I am one of the home owners on 40th Ave S. 1 > would like to share the opinions of some of my > neighbors. > > > > There is concern about the proposed 6 -inch > concrete raise curbs and wide sidewalks. They > don't belong in this neighborhood, not on this > street. This area is casual, raised curbs & 5' > sidewalks are not welcome. The suggested rolled > asphalt curbs -- would do a great job of getting the > surface water to the catch basins, and blend with > our casual neighborhood atmosphere, one of the > attractive reasons I bought a home here. > > I do not want wide streets or > wide sidewalks. They take up valuable space. I've > seen from other neighborhoods, The wider the street, > the faster vehicles drive and more non- local > traffic cuts through, to injure our family and pets > at play. We do not welcome more trouble with fancy > wide streets, and, it will destroy the casual, > wander- out - into - the - street -to- visit - with -a- neighbor. > > We have a lot of walkers in this neighborhood from > Boeing & other nearby employment. They choose to > walk on the casual street, side by side so they can > chat while exercising. Please note, there are some > sidewalks in the area, there is also the bike trail > nearby, but they choose the comfort of our low -key > street, along with bikes, neighbors visiting, and > children playing. It's just that kind of nice > neighborhood, please don't ruin it with fancy raised > curbs & sidewalks. > > Yes, new water lines means improvement for home & > Fire Fighting, that is a good thing. > > And yes, we could use decent drainage in this > neighborhood. > > But remember, the fancier you make this > neighborhood, the value ( taxes) of my home > increases. That is not a good thing. I don't > give a damn about the 'resale' value of my house, I > plan on staying here for a several more decades, and > need to be able to afford it, without needing to > visit the food bank. You need to keep in mind, we > might live in a high tech city, but many here are • > simple people with a simple jobs. > > Save the city some money, make > the necessary improvements, but keep the > neighborhood comfortable & casual. > > > > Bonnie > > 11801 40th Ave S > > > > > > Original Message > From: Lettie Haggard [mailto:basketdiva @msn.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 6:00 PM > To: Georgina Kerr; tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us; > tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us > Cc: Eric Mathison; Arlene; Bob Schalhamer; Bonnie; > Catherine "Cathie" DesJardin; Charlene Travers; > Cindy & Lance Murphy; Cindy & Lonnie Magee; James > Barnett; Matt Patton; Moira Bradshaw; Rosemary @ > work; Teo & Rebekah Hunter; Tony & Debbie Carosino; > Vickywoods > Subject: Re: Duwamish street improvements? > > > > Thank you Georgina for facing these issues and > staying informed. I appreciate you so much. My > thought is the Boeing people won't walk on the > sidewalks anyway during their daily strolls, as they > walk 6 abreast and a sidewalk will not fit their > girth. Isn't that what the bike trail is for? > Hmmm...I don't want to live on Tukwila hill with the > manicured lawns and sidewalks. Our neighborhood > reminds me of the book To Kill a Mockingbird in the > way that there are mysteries, folklore, interesting > characters and a safe place for kids to be kids. We > have trees and the river and shacks and gardens and > much, much more. The beauty of this place is that it > is not sterile or bland or homogenous, and should > not need to be...ever.I have more on my mind, but > Atticus needs his dinner and I've got to get Scout > out of the tree to wash her hands...Peace, Lettie > > > > Original Message > > From: Georgina Kerr > > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:43 PM • • From: "Georgina Kerr" <georgina -on- the- duwamish @attbi.com> To: <tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/30/02 5:34PM Subject: Duwamish street improvements? The Department of Public Works has asked for citizen input into the proposed street changes to our Duwamish neighborhood. I'd like you to know my thoughts on this, and I'd like you to also know that my thoughts are shared with my neighbors. Some don't have email or the time to give their input. Those on the cc line don't necessarily agree with any or all of this email -- but then again, some of my neighbors who don't have email support my opinions totally. To begin with, I guess the attitude of Public Works is summed up by its use of the title "Duwamish Revitalization" in a recent Hazelnut announcement. That's a slap in the face to our neighborhood, and as far as I'm concerned, it shows how little you know or appreciate about our community. I would have titled the announcement "Duwamish Prostitution ". Maybe that seems harsh to you, or foolish. But I would guess that the people who worked so hard to save the Pike Place Market from "improvements" felt the same way as I do. Would you asphalt the Market's brick streets? Tear down the old wooden produce bays that tourists find so quaint and attractive? Wouldn't these actions have amounted to prostituting the integrity of the Market? By the same token, we all know from watching Antiques Roadshow that the person who "cleans up" their bronze Tiffany lamp -- and removes its century-old patina in the process -- has just removed 90 percent of its value. This neighborhood feels like a country oasis to me and many of my neighbors. There aren't many communities left that can make that claim, or that can truthfully say that their neighborhood has a welcome, small -town feel. As you can tell, I like our community the way it is -- lumps, bumps, warts & all. I don't want do- gooders prostituting this area. I want to avoid the impervious surfaces of a concrete jungle here. We're the only respite in this heavily industrialized area! I'm aware of the concern about needing to direct runoff water. My response is that if Public Works does their job right, then the design of the street itself, plus the added storm drains, should be the solution. If there's absolutely positively no way to dissuade Public Works from installing curbs, then I suggest that they install rolled asphalt curbs. At least they would match the asphalt street and wouldn't be as unattractive as 6 -inch concrete curbs. I also believe that the rolled asphalt curb would save money over concrete curbs. Although it has been suggested that rolled asphalt may present maintenance problems, I can truthfully respond that the rolled asphalt curb in front of our West Seattle home has never had an ounce of maintenance in the past 20 years -- and still is in perfect condition. I know from reading the Hazelnut that the Council is asking citizens to advise them about ways to save money in these budget- crunched days. So that's my money- saving suggestion: install asphalt curbs instead of concrete curbs. If I had it my way, instead of using this money for curbs and gutters, I would have put the funds into undergrounding our utility lines. City Light says that it wanted to do this while the streets were being torn up to install sewer lines -- but the city of Tukwila said no because it would have been too expensive. So if you were in my shoes, which would you have voted for? Hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on destroying the look and feel of your neighborhood, or spending that same amount of money to remove the huge eyesore and constant maintenance headaches that overhead utility lines cause? Hmmm.... p.s. I was not able to attend the Mar. 28 Public Works meeting due to a schedule conflict. The meeting was under - publicized, and did not give adequate notice. - Georgina Kerr 3834 S. 116th St. Tukwila WA 98168 CC: "Eric Mathison" <hltimes @seanet.com >, "Arlene Patton" <aadamos @tideworks.com >, "Bob Schalhamer" <schalhamer @aol.com >, "Bonnie" <novina @msn.com >, "Catherine "Cathie" DesJardin" < catherine .a.desjardin @boeing.com >, "Charlene Travers" <ctravers3 @yahoo.com >, "Cindy & Lance Murphy" <gurizwalds @aol.com >, "Cindy & Lonnie Magee" <CindyMagee @aol.com >, "James Barnett" <Barnett.j @portseattle.org >, "Lettie & Bill Haggard" <basketDiva @msn.com >, "Matt & Arlene Patton" <basmatt @hotmail.com >, "Moira Bradshaw" <mbradshaw @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "Rosemary @ work" <rosemary@treehouse4kids.org >, "Teo & Rebekah Hunter" <rebekahhunter @yahoo.com >, "Tony & Debbie Carosino" <carosinod @yahoo.com >, "vicky woods" <vickyw @atg.wa.gov> • • From: "novina" <novina @msn.com> To: <tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "Georgina Kerr" <georgina -on- the- duwamish @attbi.com >, " Lettie Haggard" <basketdiva @msn.com> Date: 3/30/02 7:41 PM Subject: RE: Duwamish street improvements? Agree !! I Sent a Letter to Public Works in February, with similar views. Apparently, my opinion didn't count. Here is the letter again, hopefully Tukwila City Council will not be hard of hearing, as the Public Works seem to be. RE: 2002 Duwamish Street Project concerning sidewalks I am one of the home owners on 40th Ave S. I would like to share the opinions of some of my neighbors. There is concern about the proposed 6 -inch concrete raise curbs and wide sidewalks. They don't belong in this neighborhood, not on this street. This area is casual, raised curbs & 5' sidewalks are not welcome. The suggested rolled asphalt curbs -- would do a great job of getting the surface water to the catch basins, and blend with our casual neighborhood atmosphere, one of the attractive reasons I bought a home here. I do not want wide streets or wide sidewalks. They take up valuable space. I've seen from other neighborhoods, The wider the street, the faster vehicles drive and more non- local traffic cuts through, to injure our family and pets at play. We do not welcome more trouble with fancy wide streets, and, it will destroy the casual, wander- out - into - the - street -to- visit - with -a- neighbor. We have a lot of walkers in this neighborhood from Boeing & other nearby employment. They choose to walk on the casual street, side by side so they can chat while exercising. Please note, there are some sidewalks in the area, there is also the bike trail nearby, but they choose the comfort of our low -key street, along with bikes, neighbors visiting, and children playing. It's just that kind of nice neighborhood, please don't ruin it with fancy raised curbs & sidewalks. Yes, new water lines means improvement for home & Fire Fighting, that is a good thing. And yes, we could use decent drainage in this neighborhood. But remember, the fancier you make this neighborhood, the value ( taxes) of my home increases. That is not a good thing. I don't give a damn about the 'resale' value of my house, I plan on staying here for a several more decades, and need to be able to afford it, without needing to visit the food bank. You need to keep in mind, we might live in a high tech city, but many here are simple people with a simple jobs. Save the city some money, make the necessary improvements, but keep the neighborhood comfortable & casual. Bonnie 11801 40th Ave S Original Message From: Lettie Haggard [mailto:basketdiva @ msn.com] Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 6:00 PM To: Georgina Kerr; tukpweng @ci.tukwila.wa.us; tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us Cc: Eric Mathison; Arlene; Bob Schalhamer; Bonnie; Catherine "Cathie" • • DesJardin; Charlene Travers; Cindy & Lance Murphy; Cindy & Lonnie Magee; James Barnett; Matt Patton; Moira Bradshaw; Rosemary @ work; Teo & Rebekah Hunter; Tony & Debbie Carosino; Vickywoods Subject: Re: Duwamish street improvements? Thank you Georgina for facing these issues and staying informed. I appreciate you so much. My thought is the Boeing people won't walk on the sidewalks anyway during their daily strolls, as they walk 6 abreast and a sidewalk will not fit their girth. Isn't that what the bike trail is for? Hmmm...1 don't want to live on Tukwila hill with the manicured lawns and sidewalks. Our neighborhood reminds me of the book To Kill a Mockingbird in the way that there are mysteries, folklore, interesting characters and a safe place for kids to be kids. We have trees and the river and shacks and gardens and much, much more. The beauty of this place is that it is not sterile or bland or homogenous, and should not need to be...ever.I have more on my mind, but Atticus needs his dinner and I've got to get Scout out of the tree to wash her hands...Peace, Lettie Original Message m: Georgina Kerr Sen • Saturday, March 30, 2002 5:43 PM To: to •weng @ci.tukwila.wa.us; tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us Cc: Eric . .thison; Arlene Patton; Bob Schalhamer; Bonnie; Catherine "Cathie" DesJardin; . arlene Travers; Cindy & Lance Murphy; Cindy & Lonnie Magee; James Barnet Lettie & Bill Haggard; Matt & Arlene Patton; Moira Bradshaw; Rosemary @ wo Teo & Rebekah Hunter; Tony & Debbie Carosino; vicky woods Subject: Duwamish treet improvements? The Department of Publi Works has asked for citizen input into the proposed street changes to our Duw ish neighborhood. I'd like you to know my thoughts this, and I'd like you to also know that my thoughts are shared with my ne •hbors. Some don't have email or the time to give their input. Those on the cc lin: don't necessarily agree with any or all of this email -- but then again, som of my neighbors who don't have email support my opinions totally. To begin with, I guess the attitude of Public Wo ,s is summed up by its use of the title "Duwamish Revitalization" in a recent zelnut announcement. That's a slap in the face to our neighborhood, and as f. as I'm concerned, it shows how little you know or appreciate about our com nity. I would have titled the announcement "Duwamish Prostitution" Maybe that seems harsh to you, or foolish. But I would guess that the •eople who worked so hard to save the Pike Place Market from "improvement " felt the same way as I do. Would you asphalt the Market's brick streets? Tear down the old wooden produce bays that tourists find so quaint and attractive? Wouldn't these actions have amounted to prostituting the integrity of the Market? By the same token, we all know from watching Antiques Roadshow that the person who "cleans up" their bronze Tiffany lamp -- and removes its century-old patina in the process -- has just removed 90 percent of its value. Memorandum To: Steve Lancaster From: Moira Carr Bradshaw Date: March 28, 2002 Subject: Duwamish Area Improvements SEPA Decision File No. E02 -006 Project Description: A public project to install new and upgrade existing public facilities in the Duwamish neighborhood, which is generally bounded on the north and east by the Duwamish River and on the south and west by Interurban Ave. Improvements will include: new sanitary sewer (6,800 lineal feet,) a sewerage lift station, replacement domestic water (4100 lineal feet) and new storm sewer facilities including catch basins, drain lines (3,200 lineal feet) and water quality vault; and street improvements consisting of curb, gutters, sidewalks in some locations, and an asphalt overlay on public streets. See the attached vicinity map and site plan. The private land being served is approximately 36 acres. Other agencies with Jurisdiction: ValVue Sewer District; Department of Ecology, Required Permits /Approvals: Shoreline Permit State Electrical Permit Notice of Application Issued February 28, 2002 Comment Period Deadline: 30 March 2002 Public Comments Received: None Documents considered with SEPA checklist: 1. SEPA Checklist (Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engrs. Inc. February 2002) 2. Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist, (Undated) Page 1 of 2 03/28/02 Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth /Soil The area is relatively flat except for the river bank and street embankment. Riverbank failure has occurred on the east bank about 1/4 mile upstream from the project area. The soil is silt and sand. The utility lines, which will be installed by trenching, will stop at the top of riverbank. A temporary sedimentation and erosion control plan has been prepared and is intended to control the potential for pollution of surface waters. Storm Water The amount/area of street related impervious surface is increasing by 24,000 square feet. Additional detention is not required for the increased impervious area but a water quality vault is being installed to provide treatment of storm water prior to its conveyance and discharge through an existing outfall to the Duwamish River. Environmental Hazards The applicant noted that there is some risk for the construction workers who will be connecting the existing sewer lines. No safeguards are proposed to mitigate potential hazards. The Washington Administrative Code (246- 272 - 18501) requires property owners who abandon septic tanks to follow these procedures: 1. Have the septage removed by an approved pumper 2. Remove or destroy the lid and 3. Fill the void with soil. The City issues side sewer permits for new hook -ups and information on abandoning septic systems is included with the permit. Final inspection by the City includes an inspection of the above elements. Housing The proposal creates opportunity for new lots to be created. Given the minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet and the size of the existing lots in the area there is the potential for an additional 69 houses to be built in this area. Because of the current configuration of streets, property lines, the location of existing houses, and the need to provide additional streets to provide sufficient access and turnaround, the range of potential new houses is more likely about half that amount. Public Service The new services for sanitary service and the potential for new homes will increase the need for public services but at a relatively small percentage for the existing service providers. Recommended Threshold Determination: Determination of Nonsignificance C: \mcb\duwam area\SEPAreport.doc Page 2 of 2 03/28/02 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development • File Number EOZ- WD ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: Building Manning ID I4ublic Works ❑ Police Project Name: Address: Date Transmitted: Staff Coordinator: 11)1 k /. Z Response Due by: 444144 Z Date Response Received: Instructions The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and f) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working day id. /4allto Lam/ Comments Prepared by: Date: Page 1 of 1 • • WAC 246- 272 -18501 Abandonment. Persons permanently removing a septic tank, seepage pit, cesspool, or other sewage container from service shall: (1) Have the septage removed by an approved pumper; (2) Remove or destroy the lid; and (3) Fill the void with soil. [Statutory Authority: RCW 43.20.050.94 -09 -025, § 246- 272 - 18501, filed 4/15/94, effective 1/1/95.] http:// www .mrsc.org/nxt/gateway.dll/wac /wac %20246 %20 %20title /wac %20246 %20 - 272'... 03/28/2002 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION -r, LE- S 1 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: 39.13 w co/-15E(-612-. ST Notice of Public Hearing cf 81.79 - 3 a ci,S'" Determination of Non- Significance Notice of Public Meeting (crT Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance 'h Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Mu11er.Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this / /n`' day of Mtio-Nin the year 2002. PE: 2ovE /fifth_ cur -71) ceDi}K. FILD Pe, (LT I n S PNE aco..s 39.13 w co/-15E(-612-. ST s s -rrt..E wA cf 81.79 - 3 a ci,S'" Project Name: ()i L- Uti . SSW i)t (crT Project Number: L02. —005" _ ,S tcu Lr 'h 4-c- tT E0 2--Oo ,S 4 Mailer's Signature: s Person requesting mailing: golp_lk-- P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION Val Vue Sewer District has filed applications for the construction of lines and facilities for sanitary sewer, domestic water, and storm sewer and street improvements consisting of curb, gutters, sidewalks in some locations- and a'n asphalt overlay. The project location is in the Duwamish neighborhood generally bounded<by the Duwamish•River on the north and east and Interurban Avenue._and East Marginal Way on the west Permits applied for include: Shoreline Permit. Other known required permits include: State Electrical Permit; Right of Way Use Permit and Easements Studies required with the applications include an Environmental Checklist and an Endangered Species Act,Screening Checklist, which have been submitted and will lead to a Determination of Significance or. Nonsignficance: The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view . the files, you may request them at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100. Files include: L02 -005 — Shoreline Permit; E02 -006 — SEPA Decision Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., 30 March 2002. You may request a.copy of any decision and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. Appeals of the Shoreline Substantial Development permit shall be to the State Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 90.58, The Shoreline Management Act of 1971. For further information on this proposal, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw at (206) 431 -3651 or visit ,our offices at 6300. Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. or by email at mbradshaw @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Application Filed: February 14, 2002 Notice of Completeness Issued: February 26, 2002 Notice of Application Issued: February 28, 2002 • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(a)ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION AND IGNO POSTING OF PUBLIC ) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I c (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. 1 in accordance with Section I certify that on 2 1 l Zw"-- the Public Notice Board(s) roe located at 18.104.11 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property vehicular 5 u[_ flk , N -3,4"' so as to be clearly seen from each right-of-way primary s for application file number ,' �1�DO� : � ��-004 access to the property pp :..i�c�ispose of the I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove an . r 1� been (isp days t e sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or : a Notice letter. Applicant or Project a 's Signature On this day personally appeared before me eiSS- t to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she-signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this �■'• et°A F'qF�l..'% NOTARY ` 4, 00TARY s % .. residing at ✓ r t`. ,. tT /. A tiL� —, \S ay of Z_ "Z' My commission expires on Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. Engineering Planning Surveying Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw City of Tukwila'�� 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington, 98188 ubject: City of Tukwila/Val Vue Sewer District Joint Project Duwamish Area Improvements SEPA & Shoreline Application Submittal February 26, 2002 Dear Ms. Bradshaw: Per your request please find enclosed the following supplemental information for the SEPA & Shoreline Application submittal: 1. Assessors maps indicating the area of mailing notification . 2. Mailing labels for the property absentee property owners. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, cc: Mike Cusick - City of Tukwila Dana Dick - Val Vue Sewer District P:\P00 \00111.00\Docs\sepa shoreline supplemental infottnation.wpd ' Federal Way 253.568.6500 PEI HALLEGON ASSOCIATES CO S L ING ENG E, RS, INC. Robert D. Stanton, P.E. Vice President Kirkland 750 Sixth Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 P. 425.827.2014 • F. 425.827.5043 Portland 888.723.7853 Seattle 206.441.1855 Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. Engineering Planning Surveying Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington, 98188 February 28, 2002 Subject: City of Tukwila/Val Vue Sewer District Joint Project Duwamish Area Improvements SEPA & Shoreline Application Submittal Dear Ms. Bradshaw: Per your request please find enclosed the following supplemental information for the SEPA & Shoreline Application submittal: 1. 11" x 17" reduced plan of the composite utility plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. cc: Mike Cusick - City of Tukwila Dana Dick - Val Vue Sewer District P:\P00 \00111.00\Docs\sepa shoreline supptemental information2.wpd Federal Way 253.568.6500 Sincerely, PENHALLEGON AS OCIATES CO t SULTING ENG EE S, INC. Robert D. Stanton, P.E. Vice President Kirkland 750 Sixth Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 P. 425.827.2014 • F. 425.827.5043 Portland 888.723.7853 RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Seattle 206.441.1855 • City of Tukwlla • Department of Community Development NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION DATED 26 February, 2002 February 26, 2002 Dana Dick Val Vue Sewer District 14816 Military Rd. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 Subject: Duwamish Area Improvements Dear Mr. Dick: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Your applications for a Shoreline permit and a SEPA decision on improvements in the sanitary sewer, potable water and stoi,u sewer lines and facilities and for street improvements in the Duwamish. area are complete. For the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements the completeness date is 26 February 2002.. The City of Tukwila will install two notice boards within the vicinity of the improvements within a2 days of the date of this letter. When the boards are in place, you or your consultant must post laminated copies of the Notice of Application on the boards. This notice is available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notices, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information. is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to. complete the review process. I will be contacting your representative Robert Stanton soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak with me, feel free to call me at 431 -3651. Sincerely, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner C: Mike Cusick Robert Stanton C:\mcb\duwam area \CMPLTAPP.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • .CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Duwamish Area Improvements (Sanitary Sewer. Water Main, Storm Sewer, Street Reconstruction) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. N47°2'54" Westl 22b 1 7' 1 7" The project area is bounded by the Duwamish River on the north and east, East Marginal Way on the west and SR -599 and Interurban Avenue South on the south. Quarter: Section: Township: 23/ Range: 4F, (This information may be found on your tax state4i>lint.) RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: Dana Dick - Val Vue Sewer District 14816 Military Road South, Seattle,,,WA 98168 206 -R12 -3236 1 FAX: 206- 242 -1527 Signature: G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 FCC PERMIT CENNTER v b Date: FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P- SEPA Planner 1 , 2,cA )C01/4 - File Number: EO a _ 0© r Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: FO(9 —0/1 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: 10 a - DO c NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Duwamish Area Improvements (Sanitary Sewer. Water Main, Storm Sewer, Street Reconstruction) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. N47°2'54" Westl 22b 1 7' 1 7" The project area is bounded by the Duwamish River on the north and east, East Marginal Way on the west and SR -599 and Interurban Avenue South on the south. Quarter: Section: Township: 23/ Range: 4F, (This information may be found on your tax state4i>lint.) RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: Dana Dick - Val Vue Sewer District 14816 Military Road South, Seattle,,,WA 98168 206 -R12 -3236 1 FAX: 206- 242 -1527 Signature: G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 FCC PERMIT CENNTER v b Date: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST )p, A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Duwamish Area Improvements 2. Name of applicant: Val Vue Sewer District RECEIVED FFR j,4 ?' COMMUNITY 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact persoOnFVELOPMENT Applicant :. Contact Person: Val Vue Sewer District Bob Stanton, P.E. 14816 Military Road South Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engrs. Inc. P.O. Box 69550 750 Sixth Street South Tukwila, WA 98168 Kirkland, WA 98033 Mr. Dana Dick District Manager (425) 827 -2014 (206) 242 -3236 4. Date checklist prepared: February 2002 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction in Spring /Summer /Fall of 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been pr� d, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 2 FEMA Flood Insurance Maps ( Dated May 1995 ) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None 1 10. List government approvals or permits that will be needed for our p oposa1, if known City of Tukwila Shoreline Permit, State Electrical Permit, Right of l Use Permit and Easements 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed u s and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Duwamish Area Improvements project includes installation of sanitaty sewer (5200 lineal ft. of 8" and 1600 lineal ft. of 6' pipe), domestic water (4100 LF of 8" pipe), and storm sewer facilities (catchbasins, 1600 LF of 12' pipe, 1600 LF of 18" pipe, and water quality vault). Sidewalk is added or replaced on one side of the street, and existing streets are reconstructed with curb and gutter or asphalt overlay. The sanitary sewer provides an alternative to existing on -site septic systems. The water is to replace undersized water lines. A new lift station is proposed to be located underground adjacent to the Interurban Trail & the westerly projection of S 117th Street. This lift station will pump to the existing Seagate Pump Station located at S 116th St. and East Marginal Way. A new emergency generator will be located adjacent to the Seagate Pump Station and new electrical service will be installed by boring or jacking. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. North 47° 2' 54" West 122° 17' 17" The Duwamish Project area is bounded by the Duwamish River on the north and east, East Marginal Way on the west and SR 599 and Interurban Ave S. on the south. Streets include S. 116th St., S. 117th St., S 119th St., 39th Ave. s, 40th Ave. 5., 40th Pl. S., and Interurban Pl. S. (See attached Vicinity Map.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flatz rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The project area soils include loose sandy silt (ML), poorly graded sand (SP) with silty sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None /4I4 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. - This project is trenching for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer, including excavation for stormwater vault and lift station and construction of a new road section. Approximately 12,000 cy of export materials and approximately 12,000 cy of import materials. Some minor grading will be required for the lift station. The unsuitable fill material will be hauled off site to an approved site and imported fill will be obtained from an approved source determined prior to the start of construction as per City of Tukwila standards f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some minor erosion could occur during construction. The major earthwork is trenching for the sewer, water and storm water lines and excavation for the water quality vault. Road reconstruction occurs in existing roadways. During construction on the pump station some minor erosion could occur. Erosion will not occur on the completed site. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? -• This project consists of utility and street improvements in the public right of way and on easements. The increase in impervious area is a result ofstreet widening and sidewalks. The existing streets are approximately 65,000 square feet and the improved streets with sidewalks will be approximately 89,000 square feet. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An erosion control plan will be implemented. Runoff from pavement surfaces and groundwater from trench de- watering will be filtered and settled before discharge into the existing storm system. CB filter bags, straw bales, silt fences, etc. will be installed Standard operation procedures and Best Management Practices of the City of Tukwila will be followed 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust,, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Typical emissions associated with paving and operation of construction equipment, and dust associated with excavation and backfill can be anticipated during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Standard methods of reducing impact to air will be utilized and include muffling on all heavy equipment, as well as street sweeping, vacuuming, and/or washing, and watering as required. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes, the Duwamish River which flows into Puget. Sound 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, Some sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer lines will be within 200 ft of the Duwamish River at five locations. The storm water will be conveyed through an existing outfall into the Duwamish River near Interurban Pl. S. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water to wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 4 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. The new sanitary sewer, storm, and water lines do not fall within the 100-year flood plain of the Duwamish River. The storm water is discharged into an existing outfall into the Duwamish River near Interurban Pl. S. The Duwamish River Flood Plain is contained within the river 's steep banks as shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Maps. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. The project provides an alternative to the existing septic tanks, which can be abandoned in place when houses connect to new sanitary sewer service. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff presently sheetflows to the roadside or to a limited piped conveyance system which discharges to an existing storm outfall into the Duwamish River. All stormwater runoff from the existing reconstructed roads will be directly connected to a piped conveyance system when the project is completed The outflow from the project area will be via the same existing stormwater conveyance and outfall pipe into the Duwamish River. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The sanitary sewer provides an alternative to the existing on -site septic 5 • systems, therefore improving any chances of waste materials from entering ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: An erosion control plan will be implemented. Runoff from pavement surfaces and groundwater from trench de- watering will be filtered and settled before discharge into the existing storm system. Standard operation procedures and Best Management Practices of the City of Tukwila will be followed. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs, X grass _ pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? During construction some vegetation such as grass, shrubs, and other small plants may have to be removed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. The project is within existing street right of ways or existing easements. Some minor landscaping may be required at the lift station site or within non paved easements. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Urban migratory birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 6 Salmon and trout in the Duwamish River. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.. Electric, to operate the Seagate Pump Station and the new lift station. No heating is required for either. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The lift station pumps operate only on an as- needed basis. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Working with sewer mains can pose a health hazard to construction workers who must cut or break those mains in the course of making connections. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 7 41004$" ate- 13 49i None b. Noise f 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None 2) What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Typical noises associated with construction equipment will occur during installation of the utilities, road reconstruction, and paving. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activities will be limited to normal daytime working hours as allowed by the City of Tukwila 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project is located entirely within an area of single family residential use. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. alu ft6 ��9 None within areas where the sewer and water facilities are to be placed. The project is within existing street right -of -way and easements. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Low Density Single Family 1/2L f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 8 • • Low Density Residential (LDR) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No, however some of the utility lines are within 200' of the Duwamish River in five locations. These are sanitary sewer, storm, and water lines which will be installed under existing streets and easements. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There are an estimated 125 people living in the project area. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This project is a result of a joint effort between the City of Tukwila and Val Vue Sewer District. The project is part of the City's overall program to improve public services in the Duwamish areas of the City. Val Vue Sewer District has identified this project as the highest priority of the District's. capital "improvements plan because of the serious deficiencies associated with the acilities and the significant benefits which the project will provide to the Duwamish , areaa residents. 9. HOUSING 6617A a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NA b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 9 NA 10. AESTHETICS • AfoN a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The sewer and water lines are underground The lift station will be underground. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NA 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None 40 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal: None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity. Interurban Trail &r2 eve /Dv of a 11 i b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None 10 • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not Applicable 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. See project maps. Access to the site is via Interurban Ave. S. and East Marginal Way. Streets included in the project area are: S.116th St., 39th Ave. S., S. 117th St., 40th Ave. S, S. 119th St., Interurban Pl. SE and 40th Pl. S. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. King Co. Metro Routes. 154, 170 and 174 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. This utility and road reconstruction project will not add or eliminate parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads will be constructed. New curb, gutter and 24 ft wide street section will be reconstructed on the following existing public streets: S.116th St., 39th Ave. S., S. 117th St., and 40th Ave. S. Sidewalk will be included on one side of the reconstructed streets. The existing streets Interurban Pl. SE and 40th Pl. S. will be overlaid. S 119th Street will be 11 widened to 18 feet which includes a 4 foot wide paved path. e. . Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not Applicable g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The new sewer, water and storm water pipes will be installed within existing public street right -of -ways. Reconstruction of the existing streets will be in accordance with City of Tukwila requirements. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, school, other)? If so, generally describe. No C/W �(4j b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. (1 Not Applicable 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, Natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The Duwamish Area Improvements project includes installation of sanitary sewer (5200 lineal ft. of 8", and 1600 lineal ft. of 6" pipe), domestic water (4100 LF of 8" pipe) and storm sewer facilities (1600 LF of 12 "and 1600LF of 18" pipe and a water quality vault). The sanitary sewer provides an alternative to existing on -site septic systems. The water line replacement is to replace existing undersized water lines. The storm sewer pipe is to connect new catch basins to an existing conveyance system connected to an outfall to the Duwamish River. The stormwater wetvault will provide water quality treatment prior to discharge. Sanitary sewer is provided by Val Vue Sewer District; water and stormwater services are 12 • provided by City of Tukwila. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on em to make its decision. Signature: Robe%t D. Stanton Date Submitted: `- 13 City of Tu., ESA Screening Checklist Date: City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist R p C pECEIv M�� 002 EVEC ®ra��NT ApplicantName: Val Vue Sewer District (ATTIC: Dana Dick) 'Street Address: 14816 Military Road South City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98168 Telephone: (206) 242 -3236. DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take' of Chinook salmon; coho salmon, or cutthroat-trout as defined by Section 9 c;f -thc Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 • City of Tula ESA Screening Checklist _ Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 . Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -.0 _ v YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under "1.MC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6 -0 - YES Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 2 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13).. For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. — Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -2 See Composite Utility Plans and Continue to Question 1 -2 typical cross . sections 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -3 See Erosion and Sedimantation Control Provisions YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into.the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25; 2001 3 City of Tukwwa ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) See Composite Utility Plans and 4Y,E.,S - Continue to Question 2 -2 Typical Cross Sections 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 -a.s any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main .trunk, with a : potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary - high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO; Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) See Composite Utility Plans lat Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) • YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 4 • City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist .f g Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within,the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 City of Tuk • a ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 6 .. 5 5 5 8 ° a • - v` 1 - M � � Q= \ ` D ..�_._ - Fpm 5.‘. NpR i VVV �- .,Sh' V' •P \‘‘e,\ %may ! ii4, 9� y0 BOEING ACCESS RD. A) - c -L PRO ECT 111, D • a��� t , SITE �1 4 y4 116th WAR WAY . --- --- 1.1WWAMISH s s 16th ST ` vi I. . z- -o 7 N 3.3A G RECEIVED '! - -j FEB .14 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT k City of Tukwila WEN n.,wA emsenwa■ err 01;"" Vicinity Map --val we-7 6Y P„issilego„ Aeeeol toe Duwamish Area Sewer Improvements ® D Consulting •a Inc. COMMUNITY to`'¢ ar DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila I worm maw AEr i enanotr J Parcel Numbers and t Cuwam sh Area Sewer Improvements 1{ • Ujt d1 ✓f y�r t c. 't" -. �•Ti"�- y�!'�t�.- a�...,•�"i J': r, _... ��. t .. -. -sit,. �i °*y j '. s'� �'�-"a'� . c. t � ,��:'% 4 !t t: s..4 -' i �� -•.tg' - �`"- �°` y y-i.�x '� � r`��, �t��- 'a •' '""' - i.lnJ� uj t . •'� t e 10 11 12 2 13 4 15 16 t" / 'fi �j' M ��jFwt�s• *� J1 •••:-...:......;.. .� a,'•''Y!}G'�� 18 19 — _ 47 St. 20}.. 48 Ct Sourh 11:th N 3 21 -� T 49 °F. 50 7r� F Qa Z 30 • 29 28 2A7 Vl 25 S 22 51 27 24���i 117th 0 St? 52 0 e' � 31 rn 53 54 PROPOSED 33 34 36 N � 55 56 i�;Y 5 58 ,'::r,. "i: �•= z C� z LIFT STATION `G <N y v' w 32 41,), 35 59 60 .61 ,:+�:��- 62 < 38 � 4p: 65 :6:L 8599 70, 43 45 v���:`yt,•'.�'is,�, 73 72 71 74 75 '•zr 76 77 !••;;.�;° 0 150 300 78 j 9 S. 119th 80 81 82 rc. St. 8' 84_.. ,Ad 85 ;4 � %.;''rj Vim' err �$ OOT BRIDGE 89 .�rt is "-�,; RECEIVED q FEB 1•4 2002 COMMUNITY to`'¢ ar DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila I worm maw AEr i enanotr J Parcel Numbers and t Cuwam sh Area Sewer Improvements 8 s \\o TCONSEMPOTR R4R TEMPO ARY CONBTRUCT,O EASEMENT O. 7 0000 0010 PTI EABEMEN N°0 . \8 ASMENT *1 E II 8EMENT'88 \ u ra 8. 118th STREET 4s 01125 0100 mm i % i;% / //•✓' iirii /1 /7// ii cl I E EASEMENT EASEMENT 001. 8 ❑ • 01 8. 117th STREET 0125 ono LI \ 0 I 1 • 1 Li O EASEMENT NO. V /iii 11 200 200 GRAPFjIC SCALE ET) \ D EASEMENT NO. 2 0125 _ 0 0140 D o ❑ EASEMENT NO. 8 ME. [1 121 0122 0101 EABEMEN NO. 4 ozazyza, /1!1/Leu 0100 0001 0101 0100 0100 Q 010] W0410e440 M30 106 00 0 042 0010 _I- 1 EASEME b. 8 11S - STREET-- Val Vue Sewer District RECEIVE Duwamish Area Improvements FEB i .4 2002 Easement Exhibit COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT KING COUNTY •ousing and Community Development *ram Community Development Sectio ( Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue, Suite 50R E C E I p p IE Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 `�/ (206) 296-7540 C Lb O 6 2002 / COMMUNITY Date: Z /� /�D� DEVELQPIIUIIENT To: D /%`Q, fr2dS"� , pL. ionei G• oc X200 50 caticeMer aid • I AY -4tlaI WA °niB ir O Project # O As Requested O For Comment 0 For Your Information 0 Complete and Return 0 per Phone Call Remarks: . N % alp t l% • A&' y 4t .y &.14) Madera i +0 Lou ' A/45 /.,Avr,l led by 6Vey . o •N L eL4rwt was w t f t. oLr4MJ;, 1 COB& lS cb,r - A'sec�. From: 1115 (3/97) Intercounty Mail: GAT 37 • • From: "Jensen, Eric" <Eric.Jensen @METROKC.GOV> To: "'Mbradshaw @ci.tukwila.wa.us"' <Mbradshaw @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 1/31/02 2:54PM Subject: RE: CDBG for Duwamish Sidewalk Project in Tukwila : BA meeting list Hi Moira. I received the Sound Transit ESA reports from Alice. What I need right now is to understand from either you or Ryan where in these reports that it particularly specifies how the Duwamish Sidewalk Project would be considered a no effect determination on the three primary listed species of cutthroat, bulltrout, and bald eagle. I'm waiting to hear back from the ESA Policy Office on when the pre - submittal consult meeting can occur. I'll let you know as soon as I do. Also, I understand from my Coordinator, Joshua Goldinger, that he spoke with Mike Cusick about how the project will be required to complete an 8 -step floodplain study and that this project will be required to meet federal labor standard compliance. Original Message From: Alice Strand [mailto:astrand@ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:59 PM To: Eric.Jensen @metrokc.gov Cc: Joshua.Goldfinger @metrokc.gov Subject: CDBG for Duwamish Sidewalk Project in Tukwila : BA meeting list Eric, As we discussed, please schedule a pre- meeting regarding ESA checklist issues at your convenience. Follow up to inform these people of the actual meeting schedule. Mike Cusick, Project Engineer 433 -0179 Ryan Partee, Fisheries Biologist 433 -0179 Moira Bradshaw, Planner 431 -3670 As I said on the phone, I will mail you copies of the Sound Transit Endangered Species Evaluations completed for the Tukwila Freeway Route in Novemeber, 2001. This light Rail Route runs immediately adjacent to the Duwamish neighborhood and the sidewalk project in question. They will be mailed on Tuesday as I am awaiting copies of the concurrance letters from USF &W and NMPHS. Thanks Alice Strand CC: "'mcusick @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <mcusick @ci.tukwila.wa.us> �4— J C.zvt. ,L? 5,e, - 1(- C.. L,u tc l/ Duwamish Sidewalk Project Summary Duwamish Existing Conditions The Duwamish neighborhood was annexed from King County in 1989. Because it was developed under King County jurisdiction, Duwamish infrastructure does not meet minimum City development standards. Substandard water facilities and no sanitary sewer facilities have led to a virtual moratorium on building and redevelopment permits in Duwamish. The majority of streets have a ROW width of 40 feet but are paved to about 20 feet. There is no coordinated sidewalk system and the lack of curb, gutter and storm drainage facilities results in frequent flooding of those walkways that do exist. Electrical and telephone utility poles and overhead lines are located on both sides of the street. Val -vue Improvements The Val -vue Sewer District is planning a project that will provide Duwamish with basic water and sewer infrastructure in line with City development standards. Minimal storm drainage catchbasins and storm pipe will be installed. Associated surface ROW improvements will involve in -kind replacement of pavement to the former 20 foot width. There will be no curbs or sidewalks added and the streets will continue below City standards after Val -vue improvements are completed. Utility poles will remain as currently sited. Tukwila Proposed Improvements Based on conceptual designs, staff has determined that additional street and pedestrian improvements are desirable and feasible in terms of the Val -vue construction schedule. Proposed improvements in addition to Val- , vue's plans include: • Concrete curb and gutter (both sides of street) • Concrete sidewalks (one side) • On- street parking (one side) • Additional storm drainage improvements • Water quality facilities per Department of Ecology guidelines • Consolidation of utility poles/lines on one side of ROW Primary Area of Improvement The Duwamish neighborhood is a small, geographically isolated neighborhood of mostly low and moderate income families. Because it is bounded by the Duwamish River on two sides and busy major roadways on the other two sides, this project provides benefits primarily to those residents living in the Duwamish neighborhood itself. Primarily the project will provide safer, more comfortable, pedestrian circulation within the neighborhood itself. Good interior neighborhood circulation will allow residents to more easily access inter - neighborhood pedestrian connections to bus stops along East Marginal Way and Interurban Avenue and to the nearby Tukwila omrnunityCenter . - .__ _ Neighborhood Livability Impacts • Raised curbs and improved storm drainage will direct storm water to catchbasins and additional storm pipes. This will clean up the mud and standing water that currently accumulates on walks and along street edges. Pedestrians will be less likely to be splashed by passing cars or to traverse puddles to access cars. • Page 2 • • January 29, 2002 • Raised concrete sidewalks, curbs will define the street edge. The widening of the streets will result in a more open feel to the neighborhood and allow for more organized parking of cars. This will result in a more inviting neighborhood when viewed both from the street and from within homes. ■ Driveway accesses will be formalized using curb cuts. This will result in more definition between driveways accessing homes and lawn edges near driveways. • Utility poles and lines will be consolidated on one side of the ROW. This will provide an affordable alternative to undergrounding utilities while improving neighborhood aesthetics. Aside from the physical improvements to the neighborhood, the streetscape can play a pivotal role in creating a sense of quality, pride and community in residential neighborhoods. Sidewalks provide not only a circulation network for pedestrians but can serve as a meeting place for neighbors and a play area for children.' In Duwamish, the pedestrian amenities will provide a safer, more walkable street environment on a scale in keeping with neighborhood character. With this in mind, it is likely that more people will be seen using the sidewalks. There may also be more "eyes on the street ", improving neighborhood safety in general. Using the Public Right of Way to create this sense of quality, pride and community is not a new idea. The concept is that an improvement in pedestrian amenities, and "curb appeal" may result in complementary property owner investments. These are anticipated to have a snowball effect, resulting in the gradual improvement of housing quality, increased owner- occupied housing and infill development in residential neighborhoods. Overall, the proposed project provides an opportunity to cost - effectively demonstrate the City's commitment to residential neighborhoods and quality of life issues. It affords a means wherein established residential neighborhoods that are below City standards can be improved economically in conjunction with utility projects. This project could serve as a pilot project for other similar opportunities in Tukwila. For example, similar utility projects are scheduled for Allentown and Foster Point in late 2001 and 2003 respectively. Capital Costs Preliminary estimates for the City of Tukwila Street Improvements indicate a cost range of $350,000 - $450,000', depending on the conceptual design chosen. Funding for the Val -vue portion of the project is via a Public Works Trust Fund loan repaid through an interlocal agreement between the City and Val -vue. Funding for the additional staff proposed improvements is available utilizing existing funding allocated in the 6 -year Financial Planning Model. Reimbursement of approximately $100,000 in costs is anticipaated through Community Development Block Grant funds for neighborhood capital projects. Contacts: Moira Bradshaw Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98101 Mike Cusick Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98101 Phone: 206.433.3670 Fax: 206.431.3665 Email: Mbradshaw @ci.tukwila.wa.us Phone 206.431.1641 Fax 206.431.3665 Email Mcusick @ci.tukwila.wa.us 1 American Society of Civil Engineers, National Association of Home Builders, Urban Land Institute, Residential Streets, ASCE, NAHB, ULI, 1990 • including design costs • Page 3 January 29, 2002 i3 Evelyn Boykan - Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk Project ` Page 1 From: "Goldfinger, Joshua" <Joshua.Goldfinger @METROKC.GOV> To: "Evelyn Boykan (E- rhail)" <eboykan @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 1/18/02 10:05AM Subject: Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk Project Hi Evie, I want to remind you that we need the following eligibility documentation for the Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk project: 1) a map showing the boundaries of the project service area; 2) a narrative describing the basis for determining the boundaries; 3) a land use map or other information showing that the project service area is primarily residential; and 4) data showing that at least 42.3% of the residents in the project service area are low- or moderate - income (based on 1994 HUD data). Last month, I had maps prepared for each of the Pass - through Cities that shows block groups with over 42.3% low- and mod income residents (from the 1994 HUD data) and parcels with residential buildings (based on King County Assessor's data). I have attached the map for Tukwila which will make it easy for you to provide the eligibility documentation. You can either copy and edit the map electronically or just print out and write on it. Please . make sure you show "hard" boundaries for the project service area. «tukwila_hud.pdf» The requirement for eligibility documentation for area benefit projects was included in Kathy's e-mail message to all of the Pass - through City Coordinators on 7/12/01 describing the submittal requirements for 2002 projects. The CDBG Guide to National Objectives and Eligible Activities for Entitlement Communities, Revised August 1998, pages 3 -7 to 3 -13 and Appendix D includes detailed information on the criteria and documentation requirements for area benefit projects. If you can't locate your copy of the CDBG Guide, you can find it on HUD's web site at www.hud.gov/ offices /cpd /communitydevelopment /library/deskguid.cfm. The eligibility documentation is in addition to the information Amanda Rehr, our intern, requested for the environmental review record for the project. Could you give me an idea of when you think you would be able to send us the eligibility and environmental information? Thanks. CC: "Tremper, Kathy" <Kathy.Tremper @METROKC.GOV >, "Rehr, Amanda" <Amanda.Rehr @METROKC.GOV> SOUNDTRANSIT Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Union Station 401 S. Jackson SL Seattle, WA 98104.2826 If there Is a problem with this transmission, please can the sender. MESSAGE FAX DATE ( fie/ / 07 # PAGES SENT (INCLUDING COVER) 3 TO A 1 t-C e- s-i 1rea.r' d PHONE 2-...0 (e) L}33 - , Ii0 .3 AGENCY / COMPANY cA .-.V 2• MA kw t 1 O FAX (2 0 l,Z )cf (- 3 too tg 5 FROM C iii r %.5 'T)vV rtS2 in CI DEPT/ DN PHONE 62010) - 3 98`- 5r 36- (206) 398 -5222 SENT BY K. L- at 4-.64,5 t.t4 - E C.2A7) ( I-' - `'i960 RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2002 KC HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11E0 q (44 pC0M 92442 �vF�Opm Nr ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ REPLY A.S.A.P. ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ NO REPLY NEEDED ' NO E UNflOS ZZZS 96C 4902 IVA 20 :60 ZO01/6Z /TO 4.01/ `Q/ uL rm. 11:4Z rAA 40V -rVALD. AL.7VVA\.La Li! • • United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102 Lacey, Washington 98503 Phone: (360) 753 -9440 Fax: (360) 753 -9518 JAN 2 5 2002 Ms. Helen Knoll U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration 915 Second Avenue Federal Building, Suite 3142 Seattle, Washington 98174 -1002 FWS Reference: 1-3-02-1-0147 Dear Ms. Knoll: This letter is in response to your letter and Tukwila Freeway Route Biological Assessment in King Couuty, Washington. The letter was dated October 22, 2001, and it was received in our office on October 25, 2001. Additional information was received during a meeting with U.S Department of Transportation, Sound Transit, Parametrix, and the National Marine Fisheries Service on January 3, 2002. The Federal Transit Administration determined that the Tukwila Freeway Route `nay affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" bull trout (Salvelinu.s confluentus) and will have no effect on bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service believes that sufficient information on effects of project activities has been provided for us to concur with your determination of effect for listed species. This concurrence is based on the fact that no in -water work will occur between August 15 and June 30 in order to protect bull trout, in addition to the implementation of best management practices to minimize impacts to wetlands and stormwater quantity and quality. This concludes informal consultation pursuant .to 50 CFR 402.13. The project should be reanalyzed if new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not considered in this consultation; if the action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in this consultation; and /or if a new species is listed or critical habitat is designated that may be affected by this project. 2000 Iismv L (Ill10S ZZZS 96C 90Z rid 20 :60 ZOOZ /6Z /TO uJ.f 3fuz rm. 11:0X raa ssu -i*s 41510 FUHtST $. SOUKG1S D1V uuo • • If you have further questions about this letter or your responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, please contact Liane Wedemeyer at (360) 753 -9536. Sincerely, 2 a IA-4;4 Ken S. Berg Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office cc: Sound Transit, Seattle (Townsend) NMFS, Lacey (Guy) IISNV LL WOS MC 96C 90Z. %VI 90 :60 Z00Z /6Z /T0 SOUNDTRANSIT Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Union Station 401 S. Jackson St. Seattle, WA 98104 -2826 M there is a problem with this transmission, please Gall the sender. MESSAGE DATE January 24, 2002 # PAGES SENT (INCLUDING COVER) $ L} TO Alice Strand PHONE AGENCY/ COMPANY City of Tukwila FAX (206) 431 -3665 FROM Chris Townsend DEPT/ DIV Legal/Envtl Compliance PHONE (206) 398-5135 FAX (206) 398-5009 SENT BY Katie Lichtenstein PHONE (206) 6894961 ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ REPLY A.S.A.P. ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ NO REPLY NEEDED T00 EJ LISr.YLL a aos MS 96C 90Z IVA 9T :ST ZOOZ /bZ /TO Ms. Linda M. Gehrke Deputy Regional Administrator Federal Transit Administration Jackson Federal Building 915 Second Avenue, Suite 3142 Seattle, Washington 98174 I/ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administretion NA710NAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Northwest Region 7600 Send Point Way N.E., Bldg. 1 -- Seattle, WA 98115 December 10, 2001 Re: Endangered Species Act Section 7 Informal Consultation. and Magnuson - Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation for Amended Route Segment, Tukwila Freeway Route, Central Link Light Rail Project, King County (NMFS No_WSB•01 -457). Dear Ms. Gehrke: This correspondence is in response to your request for consultation under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Additionally, this letter serves to meet the requirements for consultation under the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA). Endangered Species Act National Marine Fisheries Service (MMES) has reviewed the above referenced Biological Assessment (BA) received October 24, 2001. According to the submitted BA the project proponents are proposing to assess the impacts of an amended route segment (segment E) on listed species and designated critical habitat.. The new project segment maintains one river crossing of the Duwamish River and an elevated passage over two other streams that are not known to be utilized by listed species. A combination of man -made fish barriers in conjunction with stream size (flow) are the presumed reasons for absence. We concur with your finding of "may affect but not likely to adversely affect" for Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus • tshawytscha). NMFS concurrence with your finding is based the level of analysis that was provided to the original submittal of the Light Rail Transit project and the fact that the environmental impacts of this amended segment appear similar to the original proposal. Additionally, NMFS notes that floodplain, wetland, and stormwater impacts are included in a mitigation proposal for the project. The incorporation of best management practices for construction practices and sequencing further supports the effects determination. Finally, working in the appropriate timing window also weighed in the consideration as it minimizes the interaction of the project with rearing salmonids. eRimed on Recycled Paper IISNIVEI moos MC 96C 90Z %V3 9T: ST ZOOZ /bZ /TO • This concludes informal consultation on these actions in accordance with 50 CFR 402.14(b)(I). Th- - _ _ - .. ' .. _ .. - . • . st re- analyze this ESA consultation if 1) new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species in a. way not previously considered; 2) the action is modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species that was not previously considered; or 3) a new species is listed, or critical habitat designated, that may be affected by the identified action. Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Federal agencies are required, under §305(bX2) of the MSA and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 600 Subpart K), to consult with NMFS regarding actions that are authorized, funded, or undertaken by that agency that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH). The MSA ( §3) defines EFH as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning; breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." If an action would adversely affect EFH, NMFS is required to provide the Federal action agency with EFH conservation recommendations (MSA §305(b)(4)(A)). This consultation is based, in part, on information provided by the Federal action agency and descriptions of EFH for Pacific salmon contained in Appendix A to Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan (August 1999) developed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council and • approved by the Secretary of Commerce (September 27, 2000). The proposed action and action area are described in Section 2.2.2 of the Biological Evaluation. The project area includes habitat which has been designated as EFH for various life stages of chinook and coho (0. Idsutch). Because the habitat requirements (i.e., EFH) for the MSA - managed species in the project area are similar to that of the ESA - listed species, and because the conservation measures that the ACOE included as part of the proposed action to address ESA concerns are also adequate to avoid, minimize, or otherwise offset potential adverse effects to designated EFH, conservation recommendations pursuant to MSA ( §305(b)(4xA)) are not necessary. Since N11FS is not providing conservation recommendations at this time, no 30-day response from the•ACOE is required (MSA §305(bx4)(B)). This concludes consultation under the MSA. If the proposed action is modified in a manner that may adversely affect EFH, or if new information becomes available that affects the basis for NMFS' EFH conservation recommendations, the �4� need to reinitiate EFH consultation with NMFS in accordance with NMFS implementin regulations for EFH at 00.920(k). COOP1 rtr- IISmvu aNflOS ZZZS 96C 90Z red ST:ST ZOOZ /tZ /TO • •3- If you have any questions, please contact Dan Guy of my staff at the Washington Habitat Branch, (360) 534 -9342. Sincerely, D. Robert Lohn Regional Administrator IISNV2IZ IN110S ZZZS 96C 90Z %V3 6T : ST ZOOZ /iZ /TO Seattle !-Vnshtngton 3 26400 1(75D _c-FLEI 1 If 1 jyn MawrP_a, 7 eaTac Park , " v� 1 27300 N layfield S 142nd St .- r 3 sv 9 Gtady44a' SW 164 I i/- l nn \ 25900 tiVe NZAOlit 2 .SW 34th, 9 28401 SW 41st Alice Strand - CDBG for Duwamish Sidewa I Project in Tukwila : BA meeting list Page 1 From: Alice Strand To: Eric.Jensen @metrokc.gov Date: 1/24/02 2:58PM Subject: CDBG for Duwamish Sidewalk Project in Tukwila : BA meeting list Eric, As we discussed, please schedule a pre- meeting regarding ESA checklist issues at your convenience. Follow up to inform these people of the actual meeting schedule. Mike Cusick, Project Engineer 433 -0179 Ryan Partee, Fisheries Biologist 433 -0179 Moira Bradshaw, Planner 431 -3670 As I said on the phone, I will mail you copies of the Sound Transit Endangered Species Evaluations completed for the Tukwila Freeway Route in Novemeber, 2001. This light Rail Route runs immediately adjacent to the Duwamish neighborhood and the sidewalk project in question. They will be mailed on Tuesday as I am awaiting copies of the concurrance letters from USF &W and NMPHS. Thanks Alice Strand CC: Joshua.Goldfinger @metrokc.gov 'Alice Strand - Re: Duwamish Neighborho idewalk Project_ Page 1 I From: Alice Strand To: Goldfinger, Joshua Date: 1/24/02 1:04P M Subject: Re: Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk Project Hi Josh, A couple of follow up questions. 1. This is the first we have heard about the ESA no effects criteria /BA requirement. Is this new? Is Evie familiar with this requirement? 2. If we were to bid the whole project as one and use the grant money also, we would have to do all the Federal grants accounting procedures on the entire cost of the project. True? Can you outline some examples of these federal grant record - keeping requirements. Mike Cusick is anxius about the separate bidding requirement as he intended to bid it differently. Regards, ALice 433 -7163 »> "Goldfinger, Joshua" <Joshua.Goldfinger @METROKC.GOV> 01/18/02 10:06AM »> Hi Evie, I want to remind you that we need the following eligibility documentation for the Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk project: 1) a map showing the boundaries of the project service area; 2) a narrative describing the basis for determining the boundaries; 3) a land use map or other information showing that the project service area is primarily residential; and 4) data showing that at least 42.3% of the residents in the project service area are low- or moderate - income (based on 1994 HUD data). Last month, I had maps prepared for each of the Pass - through Cities that shows block groups with over 42.3% low- and mod income residents (from the 1994 HUD data) and parcels with residential buildings (based on King County Assessor's data). I have attached the map for Tukwila which will make it easy for you to provide the eligibility documentation. You can either copy and edit the map electronically or just print out and write on it. Please make sure you show "hard" boundaries for the project service area. «tukwila_hud.pdf» The requirement for eligibility documentation for area benefit projects was included in Kathy's e-mail message to all of the Pass - through City Coordinators on 7/12/01 describing the submittal requirements for 2002 projects. The CDBG Guide to National Objectives and Eligible Activities for Entitlement Communities, Revised August 1998, pages 3 -7 to 3 -13 and Appendix D includes detailed information on the criteria and documentation requirements for area benefit projects. If you can't locate your copy of the CDBG Guide, you can find it on HUD's web site at www.hud.gov/ offices /cpd /communitydevelopment /library/deskguid.cfm. I Alice Strand ' Re: D Project The eligibility documentation is in addition to the information Amanda Rehr, our intern, requested for the environmental review record for the project. Could you give me an idea of when you think you would be able to send us the eligibility and environmental information? CDBG Programs 1999 -2001 Fund type 2002 Program Dollars Requested Dollars Recom 2001 Program Dollars 2000Program 2000 total $286,070 total $218,365 total $303,198* Capital KC Home Repair $88,235 KC Home repair $85,882 K.C. Home Repair $70,000 Minor Home Rep Minor Home Repai $20,000 Minor Home Repair $20,000 First Time Homebuyer . First Time Home Buyers $45,000 Utility Connection $30,600 Utility Connect $15,000 CCS Housing - Recover $5,000 Latch senior housing $5,000 Avalon Mutual Housing $5,000 Duwamish Neigh. Imp. {((brit) Mountain V. Apt $75,000 SKCMSC Nike Sewer $5,000 Park Acquisition $104,954 Public Service Senior Program Suppor $24,844 nutrition coord $22,483 Nutrition Coordinator $19,000 Teen Programmer $6,118 Planning & Admin REACH staff . $23,126 Staff for homebuyer program, minor Total funds available $218,365 $303,198* * This amount includes the base entitlement, $137,910, $59,599 (old funds), $88,163 of program income and reallocation of $20,000 from 1999 budget, U4∎1∎ cu4N.A€4 4-∎_0 ' ISr COO Moog c `k-e .-1-0 ooa. 2) Minor I+o;M .z 2e be_, g_ot000 _ e A)(cL be c Ured +- cis- Fci( j ckno- foe- (recoe( Page 1 � Sto - 3 t oco p-er 04-dt (,\ k__ up 50 3C, Lo00 1- '9 (0 b�- cS —acs Pe aec� V Aike C; +sick - environmental review for Tukwila Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk Construction Page 1 • • From: "Rehr, Amanda" <Amanda.Rehr @METROKC.GOV> To: "'astrand @ci.tukwila.wa.us"' <astrand @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/28/01 3:29PM Subject: environmental review for Tukwila Duwamish Neighborhood Sidewalk Construction I am in the process of preparing the environmental review documents for the above referenced project. In order to complete the environmental review, I need the following additional information regarding your project: 1. Are any of the following State, Federal, King County or equivalent local permits required? * Clearing and Grading Permit %Gs * Floodplain Development Permit A/0 * Demolition Permit * Shoreline Substantial Development Permit \(C-S * Coastal Zone Management Certification * Hydraulic Project Approval /v0 Cvoo ti't1-' 61.17/4- 4944 -'61("t M'(# * Underground Storage Tank Notification Requirement * U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual or Nationwide 404 Permit or Section 10 Permit ,,/v * National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) A/c (LeSs 7, / s ,ices LY-SVe ) * NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit �a /e4a /IID * Water Quality Certification (401) ,4/Q How much additional stormwater run -off will be generated or conveyed 77 1;"/"."//:41 fo drainage ditches or receiving waterbodies? 3.2.SC's I C Zs yt t 9 t✓/ .045ey 'E i� Will the staging area (parking/storage of equipment and materials �� 1' �� E� � 9� 9 ) Be located on a paved or graveled surface or surface stabilized to minimize erosion and tracking mud? yE . Prevent stormwater contamination by storing liquid materials, erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers and by covering building, landscaping and waste materials? yes Prevent stormwater from running on to an area storing liquid materials, erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers, building, landscaping and waste materials by use of a curb, berm, or dike? — Use appropriate stormwater runoff control mechanisms? ^ yi5 Will stormwater management on site comply with the practices described in the King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual? -eY 1//it Will heavy mechanical disturbance be made to soils or vegetation on the site? Ks 5. Will trees or riparian vegetation be removed from the site? .6< Will all construction, demolition, dangerous wastes and hazardous wastes as defined in King County Code (K.C.C.) Chapter 10.04 be managed in accordance with K.C.C. 10.10.030 and taken to a certified solid waste or hazardous waste facility. /.�S The information you provide will be used to determine whether this project • meets King County's ESA "No Effects" criteria. If you have questions, please '- contact me at (206) 205 -5333 or by email. I am usually in the office on Wednesdays from 10am -4pm and on Fridays from 8am -4pm. Thank you, Amanda Rehr Community Development Planning Intern Housing and Community Development Program Ccw4/ 1.//i7/ 70/e /52,5 4ia /6 Ca. S�.;fF.r�CG l✓rfif+� s /'6 /sofr✓a Alice Strand,- Val- Vue_Tukwila Duwamish Improvements • Page 1 From: Chris Rhinehart <chrisr @paceengrs.com> To: "'astrand @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <astrand @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/6/01 5:08PM Subject: VaI -Vue Tukwila Duwamish Improvements Alice: These are some questions, following up on our conversation Wednesday: Re Shoreline Permit App Checkl' • 9-.L. •ders. . e Lan. • e Map -xhibi -eds to s ow uses per the` Land Use Map. ^�,_ --,10: Is a title report required for the right of way? ,-/Y 5.4 " Y C'"^-, -e_Ci. 13. Do plans need to be stamped, or will substantially complete °'-P interim plans suffice? J 1i26. Is a landscape plan required for this project? rl.0 29. The project is not a strogam frontage. (^ L. 30, 32. The river bank and related callouts will be included on a V) 6f5 site plan for those project areas within the river z e. f 1 35 -28, These items are not require elevations, rendering, e f 39. Cross - Sections: This item is not required for this project.� „� J-- I ►vf Thank you for your assistance! Chris Rhinehart, P.E. d y Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers 1601 2nd Ave. Ste 1000 �'^ Seattle WA 98101 PH V� PH 206 - 441 -1855 FAX 206 448 -7167 CC: Bob STANTON <bobs @paceengrs.com> a -� ekw J • • Qvko\Ai 6-tut, .-(kk-k. a e„,,6 S,6 IPNwkv) .,),,•,(v4ta- — pti-a C2(4, 16(014-- (or �� lv- • • MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Alice Strand, Mike Cusick Date: August 14, 2001 Subject: Duwamish street and sidewalk improvements: Cost estimate Attached you will find a worksheet estimating costs of potential streetscape and storm drainage improvements for the Duwamish neighborhood. As you know 2001 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) pass - through program funds are being requested for a portion of this neighborhood improvement project. As of today, the CDBG amount being sought is $118,607. Based on the attached cost estimate, these CDBG funds would cover the entire cost of 2700 linear feet of sidewalks and 5000 linear feet of curb and gutter, including associated driveway approaches and wheelchair ramps. Page 1 of 3 Opinion of Probable Cost Job No. Date: 0.00 # # # # # # # # ## ITEM;.: NO. DESCRIPTION NO UNITS UNIT<P.RICES ..:HIGH .IOW ,AVG .UNI PRICE ". ASSUMPTIONS /COMMENTS COST. SITE PREPARATION 10.003 Removal of Cement Conc. Sidewalk 10.005 Clearing and Grubbing 10.010 Borrow Excavation 1500 SY 10.00 10.00 10.00 SY 10.00 1 AC 10,000 10,000 10,000 AC 10,000 1000 CY 10.00 10.00 10.00 CY 10.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 010 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 30.025 CPEP 12" Diameter 2000 LF 24.00 24.00 24.00 LF 24.00 30.027 CPEP 18" Diameter 1500 LF 35.00 30.00 32.50 LF 32.50 30.036 Type 1 Catchbasin 20 EA 800 800 800 EA 800.00 30.037 Type II Catchbasin, 48" Up to 8' Deep 8 EA 2,000 1,700 1,850 EA 1,850 30.042 STORMCEPTOR 1 EA 30,000 30,000 30,000 EA 30,000 SUBTOTAL SEC. 30.00 15,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 35,000.00 48,000.00 48,750.00 16,000.00 14,800.00 30,000.00 -, 157,550.00 ROAD CONSTRUCTION 40.004 Gravel Base, Class B 500 CY 20.00 20.00 20.00 CY 20.00 10,000.00 40.006 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 200 CY 25.00 25.00 25.00 CY 25.00 5,000.00 40.011 Asphalt Concrete Pavement, CL. B 500 TON 60.00 60.00 60.00 TON 50.00 25,000.00 40.018 Cement Conc. Curb & Gutter (Radii) 5000 LF 12.00 12.00 12.00 LF 12.00 60,000.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 40.00 100,000.00 SIDEWALKS 60.001 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 1500 SY 27.00 27.00 27.00 SY 27.00 40,500.00 60.002 Sidewalk (Fine Grade and Compact) 2700 LF 1.00 1.00 1.00 LF 1.00 2,700.00 60.003 Wheelchair Ramps 6 EA 125.00 125.00 125.00 EA 125.00 750.00 60.004 Concrete Driveway Approach 300 YD 30.00 30.00 30.00 EA 30.00 9,000.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 60.00 52,950.00 MISCELLANEOUS 100.001 MOBILIZATION 100.002 ENGINEERING Filename: Sidewalk 8/14/01 2:S2 PM 1 EA 30,000 30,000 EA 10,000 1 LS 20,000 20,000 LF 20,000 SUBTOTAL SEC. 100.00 SECTION TOTALS 10,000.00 20,000.00 30,000 375,500 Page 1 of 1 Opinion of Probe Cost PROJECT: DUWAMISH PREPARED BY MC REVIEWED BY: Job No. 0.00 Date: Aug. 14, 2001 CONSTRUCTION COSTS Item # Description Estimated Cost 010 Site Preparation 35,000.00 020 Erosion Control 0.00 030 Storm Drainage System 157,550.00 040 Road Construction 100, 000.00 050 Traffic Control 0.00 060 Sidewalks 52,950.00 070 Utilities 0.00 080 Water System 0.00 090 Sanitary Sewer System 0.00 100 Miscellaneous Construction 30,000.00 110 Engineering 0.00 Total 375, 500.00 Contingency 10.00% $37,550.00 Sales Tax 8.80% $33,044.00 Grand Total $446,094.00 Filename: Sidewalk 8/14/01 2:47PL1 American FactFinder • • QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2003, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see htto: / /factfinder.census.gov /home /en /datanotes /expelu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 3 100.0 3 100.0 One race 3 100.0 3 100.0 White 3 100.0 3 100.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 3 100.0 3 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 3 100.0 3 100.0 One race 3 100.0 3 100.0 White 3 100.0 3 100.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 1 of 6 QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2004, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expplu.html. Subject All ages ' 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 42 100.0 33 100.0 One race 41 97.6 33 100.0 White 35 83.3 28 84.8 Black or African American 3 7.1 2 6.1 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1 2.4 1 3.0 http: / /factfinder .census.gov /servlet/QTTable ?_ts = 15868394280 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent Some other race 2 4.8 2 6.1 Two or more races 1 2.4 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE 33 100.0 23 100.0 One race 29 87.9 22 95.7 Total population 42 100.0 33 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 42 100.0 33 100.0 One race 41 97.6 33 100.0 White 35 83.3 28 84.8 Black or African American 3 7.1 2 6.1 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1 2.4 1 3.0 Some other race 2 4.8 2 6.1 Two or more races 1 2.4 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 2 of 6 QT -PL. Race. Hispanic or Latino. and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2005, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfindercensus.gov/home/en/datanotes/exoplu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 33 100.0 23 100.0 One race 29 87.9 22 95.7 White 22 66.7 15 65.2 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 6 18.2 6 26.1 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 1 3.0 1 4.3 Two or more races 4 12.1 1 4.3 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 33 100.0 23 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 33 100.0 23 100.0 One race 29 87.9 22 95.7 White 22 66.7 15 65.2 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 6 18.2 6 26.1 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 1 3.0 1 4.3 Two or more races 4 12.1 1 4.3 http: / /factfinder. census. gov /servlet/QTTable ?_ts = 15868394280 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 3 of 6 QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2006, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see htto://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expplu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 29 100.0 22 100.0 One race 29 100.0 22 100.0 White 24 82.8 20 90.9 Black or African American 3 10.3 1 4.5 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2 6.9 1 4.5 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 29 100.0 22 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 29 100.0 22 100.0 One race 29 100.0 22 100.0 White 24 82.8 20 90.9 Black or African American 3 10.3 1 4.5 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2 6.9 1 4.5 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2007, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see htta: / /factfinder.census.gov /home /en /datanotes /expelu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 11 100.0 11 100.0 One race 11 100.0 11 100.0 ltp:gfagtfinder.census.gov/servlet/gt Table ?_tp 15A6$ 394280 11 100.0 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE 1 3.6 1 4.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total population 11 100.0 11 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 11 100.0 11 100.0 One race 11 100.0 11 100.0 White 11 100.0 11 100.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 4 of 6 QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2008, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expplu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 28 100.0 25 100.0 One race 28 100.0 25 100.0 White 14 50.0 13 52.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 1 3.6 1 4.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 13 46.4 11 44.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 28 100.0 25 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 28 100.0 25 100.0 One race 28 100.0 25 100.0 White 14 50.0 13 52.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 1 3.6 1 4.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 13 46.4 11 44.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 http: / /factfinder. census.gov /servlet/QTTable ?_ts = 15868394280 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • Subject All ages 18 years and over _ Number Percent Number Percent Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 5 of 6 QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2009, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see htto://facthnder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/exoolu.html. Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 13 100.0 12 100.0 One race 13 100.0 12 100.0 White 13 100.0 12 100.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 13 100.0 12 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 0.0 0 0.0 Not Hispanic or Latino 13 100.0 12 100.0 One race 13 100.0 12 100.0 White 13 100.0 12 100.0 Black or African American 0 0.0 0 0.0 American Indian and Alaska Native 0 0.0 0 0.0 Asian 0 0.0 0 0.0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 0.0 0 0.0 Some other race 0 0.0 0 0.0 Two or more races 0 0.0 0 0.0 (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. QT -PL. Race, Hispanic or Latino, and Age: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File Geographic Area: Block 2010, Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http: / /factfinder.census.gov /home /en /datanotes /expplu.html. http: / /factfnder. census.gov /servlet/QTTable ?_ts = 15868394280 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent Subject All ages 18 years and over Number Percent Number Percent RACE Total population 0 (X) 0 (X) One race 0 (X) 0 (X) White 0 (X) 0 (X) Black or African American 0 (X) 0 (X) American Indian and Alaska Native 0 (X) 0 (X) Asian 0 (X) 0 (X) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 (X) 0 (X) Some other race 0 (X) 0 (X) Two or more races 0 (X) 0 (X) HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 0 (X) 0 (X) Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 0 (XL 0 N. Not Hispanic or Latino 0 (X) 0 (X) One race 0 (X) 0 (XI White 0 (X) 0 (X) Black or African American 0 (X) 0 (X) American Indian and Alaska Native 0 (X) 0 (X) Asian 0 (X) 0 (X) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 0 (X)1 0 (X) Some other race 0 (X) 0 (X) Two or more races 0 (X) 0 (X) (X) Not applicable Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Redistricting Data (Public Law 94 -171) Summary File, Matrices PL1, PL2, PL3, and PL4. Page 6 of 6 http: / /factfinder. census.gov /servlet /QTTable ?_ts = 15868394280 8/14/2001 American FactFinder U.S. Census Bureau Reference Ma • s • • Select an option, then click on the map Legend Boundaries Al" State • 00 County 00 Census Tract f+ 00 Block Group • 00 Block A/00 Place 90 UA Features /" Major Road Street StrearnMaterbody o r j StrearnANaterbody American FactFinder Main I Search I Feedback I FAQs I Help Options Change Selections Print t Download recenter G recenter and zoom in Duwaruish.Census Mapy. ♦ NORTH Quick tips S`�113th "St 2C 1- ,. • SrPrthutt 17 -6"r' Tukwila Washington • 7014 • ett#t Z' ttLbt King Seattle UA Zt 1Approx :8 miles: across. IPrepared;rntli'American Fact Finder T SOUTH b 22nd t • Zoom on an address Street Address Quick tips City State Zip Code I I Im Zoom +A, IW'%. U.S. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Street Y } Zoom on an address Page 1 of 1 .../ReferenceMapDrawS ervlet ?_ Lang =en& PANEL _ID= rm_result &errM sg= &_mapX= 400 &_m8 / 14/2001 American FactFinder A - • CQyu\i Page 1 of 3 COY (VS DP -1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100- Percent Data Geographic Area: Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see htto://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf1u.htm. u.htm. Subject Number Percent Total population 2,108 100.0 SEX AND AGE Male 1,112 52.8 Female 996 47.2 Under 5 years 141 6.7 5 to 9 years 157 7.4 10 to 14 years 157 7.4 15 to 19 years 160 7.6 20 to 24 years 134 6.4 25 to 34 years 319 15.1 35 to 44 years 419 19.9 45 to 54 years 302 14.3 55 to 59 years 87 4.1 60 to 64 years 73 3.5 65 to 74 years 94 4.5 75 to 84 years 51 2.4 85 years and over 14 0.7 Median age (years) 34.7 (X) 18 years and over 1,550 73.5 Male 801 38.0 Female 749 35.5 21 years and over 1,463 69.4 62 years and over 199 9.4 65 years and over 159 7.5 Male 75 3.6 Female 84 4.0 RACE One race 1,954 92.7 White 1,330 63.1 Black or African American 206 9.8 American Indian and Alaska Native 25 1.2 Asian 218 10.3 Asian Indian 8 0.4 Chinese 14 0.7 Filipino 48 2.3 Japanese 11 0.5 Korean 1 0.0 Vietnamese 69 3.3 Other Asian 1 67 3.2 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 51 2.4 Native Hawaiian 1 0.0 Guamanian or Chamorro 2 0.1 Samoan 28 1.3 Other Pacific Islander 2 20 0.9 Some other race 124 5.9 Two or more races 154 7.3 Race alone or in combination with one or more other races 3 White 1,414 67.1 Black or African American 253 12.0 ... /QTTable ?ds name= D& geo_ id= 14000US53033027200 &gr_name= DEC_2000_SF1 U DP18 /14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject Number Percent American Indian and Alaska Native 44 2.1 Asian 284 13.5 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 69 3.3 Some other race 209 9.9 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 2,108 100.0 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 210 10.0 Mexican 172 8.2 Puerto Rican 4 0.2 Cuban 2 0.1 Other Hispanic or Latino 32 1.5 Not Hispanic or Latino 1,898 90.0 White alone 1,266 60.1 RELATIONSHIP Total population 2,108 100.0 In households 2,108 100.0 Householder 819 38.9 Spouse 345 16.4 Child 636 30.2 Own child under 18 years 499 23.7 Other relatives 142 6.7 Under 18 years 45 2.1 Nonrelatives 166 7.9 Unmarried partner 70 3.3 In group quarters 0 0.0 Institutionalized population 0 0.0 Noninstitutionalized population 0 0.0 HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE Total households 819 100.0 Family households (families) 502 61.3 With own children under 18 years 268 32.7 Married - couple family 345 42.1 With own children under 18 years 173 21.1 Female householder, no husband present 112 13.7 With own children under 18 years 71 8.7 Nonfamily households 317 38.7 Householder living alone 244 29.8 Householder 65 years and over 57 7.0 Households with individuals under 18 years 292 35.7 Households with individuals 65 years and over 126 15.4 Average household size 2.57 (X) Average family size 3.24 (XJ HOUSING OCCUPANCY Total housing units 936 100.0 Occupied housing units 819 87.5 Vacant housing units 117 12.5 For seasonal, recreational, or occasional use 1 0.1 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 2.1 (X) Rental vacancy rate (percent) 17.0 (X) HOUSING TENURE Occupied housing units 819 100.0 Owner - occupied housing units 415 50.7 Renter - occupied housing units 404 49.3 Average household size of owner - occupied unit 2.45 (X) Page 2 of 3 ... /QTTable ?ds_ name= D& geo_ id= 14000US53033027200 &grname= DEC_2000_SF1 U DP 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • • Subject Number Percent Average household size of renter - occupied unit 2.70 (XI (X) Not applicable ' Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. 2 Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices P1, P3, P4, P8, P9, P12, P13, P17, P18, P19, P20, P23, P27, P28, P33, PCT5, PCT8, PCT11, PCT15, H1, H3, H4, H5, H11, and H12. Page 3 of 3 ... /QTTab1e ?ds name= D &geo_id= 14000US53033027200 &qr_name= DEC_2000_SF1 U_DP 8/14/2001 American FactFinder • " Page 1 of 1 • (3Y7 QT -H2. Tenure, Household Size, and Age of Householder: 2000 Data Set: Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100 - Percent Data Geographic Area: Census Tract 272, King County, Washington NOTE: For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see http://facffinder.census.gov/home/en/datanotes/expsf1u.htm. Subject Number Percent TENURE Occupied housing units 819 100.0 Owner- occupied housing units 415 50.7 Renter - occupied housing units 404 49.3 TENURE BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE Owner - occupied housing units 415 100.0 1- person household 116 28.0 2- person household 147 35.4 3- person household 56 13.5 4- person household 54 13.0 5- person household 33 8.0 6- person household 7 1.7 7 -or- more - person household 2 0.5 Renter - occupied housing units 404 100.0 1- person household 128 31.7 2- person household 101 25.0 3- person household 62 15.3 4- person household 50 12.4 5- person household 30 7.4 6- person household 21 5.2 7-or- more - person household 12 3.0 TENURE BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLDER Owner - occupied housing units 415 100.0 15 to 24 years 8 1.9 25 to 34 years 55 13.3 35 to 44 years 118 28.4 45to54years 112 27.0 55 to 64 years 59 14.2 65 years and over 63 15.2 65 to 74 years 34 8.2 75 to 84 years 22 5.3 85 years and over 7 1.7 Renter - occupied housing units 404 100.0 15 to 24 years 29 7.2 25 to 24 years 96 23.8 35 to 44 years 109 27.0 45 to 54 years 80 19.8 55to64years 48 11.9 65 years and over 42 10.4 65 to 74 years 29 7.2 75to84years 12 3.0 85 years and over 1 0.2 (X) Not applicable. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1, Matrices H4, H15, and H16. ... /QTTable ?ds_ name= D& geo_ id= 14000US53033027200 &gr_name= DEC_2000_SF1 U QT]8 /14/2001 ro Lake Washurghm El Tr f p 1,.:1 t. •SW simaei Blvd 92c. Nmm pam.l Renton � 4 h s k'r tt 15' Map Features .4 az n.i CD Ocurstanes Traci Numbers C) c) 1990 Ceosaam,..o.41 GM. MlinbrS INJ anew Roam Pans Map Crested: oecamber I0. 2001 m: VOny'pgectabchs_0000ITukwilaepr m: 4naps12001121acna _nep0Vukw,a_nW.pd/ City of Tukwila Census Data Map nno Canty 0.5 Community 8 Human Services at lanu Coon ne trom 1 Miles . • ‘ • • ? , v . NAVV • At6 VX , 6 :. : : !$• a : 4:•.:vxO*V :x :; *C*t. 6 . . p •k a . ." a 6 6 5S.6 t : •.'•; ;A' * 1Y;A eV : 6< 1 . * 6 f * * .t 4 :XAX :` • XNX V X * • k NAAVNAAVVAAV 4 V 0 66446 *oxso0ox o o x x x s 4. C X X 9 6 9 .9.9 4.•4. 9 9,X A N X 6 546 *0 :4 V soox X 0 • • x. .* S1t . y N6 v. a. ....X.••A *a•.* ..•.t5.V *vw FX. 4:.f4vw . :i::aA :'4 : a : "•; • .:•.: JvX c v '• v * e . ::. . v0. k v .r . X . .47 • A F .4 i : ' :;'::: A ? ' :.::: :• 4. oxxxoxx oxx«•»:»:.x x V A V VN 6666!,649 6 6 X X:444: 44f4X4§* 6 t 6 o 645X*6 6 6 * ; 595* . :*0*x **0x* . • : :4x X $* 4 :..A X9 4 X X 9 4:.•. $ e 0 .0 . 4 6 o9 X 4 • •: . •: • A• oV6 t f ;" :. :. : :•• N*:91: v 9 0 A A.. .Vv 4 X A .9C. ' .4.4. $6 r1..( : :'•4. . *0. X . :1 .. •. . *9! 0 k 4... .:. A X X :0! •.•. ;r '.4. 9' 5X . ti'. •" •. 4•::• . ° xex X 9 9 t 94 6 4:444e . X 0 0 0*xx 9 o X%9•9•••• $.X ..696940 .::X•0.•X % A .V. N X 6 69 A 9 6 9 N A 6VX 6 94 :.;.:•'.?;555t66AVY669X5? 4 'o x::::( o::::::':':e:::• xxxoxxxorox,xxo-*..x.::::.•,:i:ifo or 9xxx 0 x x x 0,.. * x .x .x 0 ;*'...x :4•.•:• " ok o x x o o v x x .> * .O.:X.-...x-...a O. ......'.. •• • x •.• .s A *A V N A A A. V. N A :X....f.• ...5.:.:X• 4 V 6' 6.C4.4:-X:X:6'..46:4§:.§! i 4 V 6* 6 4 X X C:::..9.•.....-X- X.,...4..44:-X b.• • x..o.,...::::::x V AAVN A A V V fAk:•f:-. A :;•.}..10.X.,.. V AV VN A A V V •:.0...ikk •;5;...{•::-.:0'''A . 0*XX:410X xoi.a:axx X.69 X99XXXXVXX X* "04XXX99XX AV.* .VNAAAVVAA x VI,VNAAVVAAAVVAA XrXX610X6666Y6 . X9.09X1.009XX AVVNAAVVNAA A V V V A A V V Ad. A A 54 6 * Y 6 6 * X Y 6 6 * WO*XX010XXX0* X 0 * X X A V A I A J •••:46 *XXV% . ;..v .j v. 6 X 6 6 X X 0 X X 6 X X V V A 6 V A V • 4 4 4 • 1 5 5 o x 4. 9 A A 40VK.t XAOXX6 9 AX* **X•6 XVXXX0X.NXX6 99 .6 V XXO9X XX* *6 PC 6 O X X X N 6 VAVVNAA V AA V V 0 X 9 0 0 X X V X 6 0 V 6 V X X '9 64 ' A X 6 9 Y x 0 X X 4.944 X X 0 4499 9 Xx X X:: :•• x 6 - • ' v 48 ' 944 6 X X X 944.. 4490 NAV NAV 9 -6 '6 V 5 Naoyy6 6 A V 6 666Y566•AVYNAXY609XY665X6 ,0A:.X AA X 0V X XA V X A . 9 t : A N 6 9 A X OXX69XXX09XXX0XXX99 '9 349. VAAVVAA ** k AVNAVV . 9 6 A 9 6 6 5 X X X 0 0 9 4.9:9344.999 X .0 34X 9 A 9 v ,XX x 6*X X :X0V x •.:, . .o6 * R., 6 4 41v X 6VX '4 X 0 .vX A 9 VXA 9 9N0A ( X0vv 9is A X t 0V .. a.XN 9N vov 9 XAX 0Y X V X XX 0 V V V X 9 X X 94.44.994.6 934 X X 0 . 09 X i - a V * 6 4 9 6 6 6 ? i * X X 0 44449484444.74.4.'. 8.7.94494.4.84 6699.344.934 346999469994.4.64.4.4.9Y9.64.34 .944XX06XXX0VXX 6 0 :9 X604XXXOX A.09Xx00Xxoo9xxoov X X OVXX X 4. Q 9 .0 X X X V XV A4.96'4046 '4344.4.434.344.4.9344.4.4 A . I X X X 0 V 9 N . X9 4 X X Y X 66 6 0 6 '. 4 0 6 1X X .44• 040 : .•4•• .4:: .40, 3 • . k .4• 0X4 : •:6 0 • . :•.•.•f ;xV 0:;. 4 % •..•••4 X: : :. ( • :A C ,.4 .X 4A 0 X :% - ;f 46 : :..:. 4•* 4 444 A X .3' .3, A *4• ' • ••:• Xk 6 • X X 0069X000 " .00X t•0XXX 49 9X A v v • ' ' X X 0 * X X 4.99 x' x o x 4. 8944.4.9 N A 4.66 6 6 A 6 C9 9 A 9 XX . . 'V X X $ A 4 '6 : A 9 0 A X 434 4.3434 V X` X 494. X X 4. X X 0 * X X X a 6 • 9 NV A.AV9 4494.499 6 6 V X I *XXO*XX *XX09XX xXx09xX NAAVNX A V .V . : .. . 9Y4. 6634 .96134 669 *34 4.0034 4. 0T34 00 9XX9 o 09XXX09 4.44.7 NAAVVAAVVA .666349663496 340934349034340 99934349.4.344.9 xo9xX0 XXX 499A AVNA AV 'X 6 6 A v ::; 0.. :.4: .X• ; ;. • 5 6 -4 : A 9 'A $ 6 6 . ; A Y :6. $ x • 9 ' 0 6 .A. . '• .. :4 4 0:k. 4.1 .. x. •. : :xVti v •• • •A • . : N N -X 0 : 9.•: 6 0 V 49. • 344. 06E4. ........ % 5X6X 4 9::? X520 X .44 A A 4A A 0:•9:•X449:•X .y.• k"**:*4.66 ' Av c0 • xA X . x X A • a A . 4 X X . .4tt XX6 g.. : 9964 343464. X x 0 k:9:••0: X X 6 0 40:6 AAVV IX6:0400X40 WS 6 49 l V A A V 6A *y.66 66%v 0 0 ft X 6 . : '.*XX * V 6 0 X X X 0 ' X0X0 • V V N ANA 666Y f 994933 4 A 4 A :444 • • Duwamish boundaries North and East: Duwamish River West: Interurban Avenue and East Marginal Way South: Interurban Place 5 908I5L Lake Washington S 1 Isla F° nLn p.: F Map Features CDua�M.OeIw O ,....: YY.I ururw.m 4:::110 C4n.0 l , Bomar. . ar. .tea.c Unincer•a.••e Nan /� taw cane eau uew CD S l } I:2=w�eM oNr CMw � r�e� 17) 0.015444. e.sra. f Pam. NT 444,44. ROWS C2) Prim •'Si- 1.x% Map Created' Decr0Der 10. 2001 m:eenylpgacblhMa_nepa,M.Sa la.ap m:.aps12001121Erha napaWkxila._nud..pM City of Tukwila Census Data Map 0 �Y+sry1 R6e SWTN51° Renton YIaY fir: sw $YI 25900 •.5189151 SI.. ...._'j Community i •44 44 C•••• Human Services �''i ,,idi IP. NO 00 0.= • a, a n . w•••• ••w •••••••• co aCa y___Sw a'•••- 0.5 1 Miles • MEMORANDUM To: Steve Mullet, Utilities Committee Members From: Steve Lancaster, Jim Morrow Date: May 1, 2001 Subject: Duwamish water, sewer and sidewalk improvements Background The Public Works Department has been working with Val -vue Sewer District to coordinate design and permitting of water, sewer and storm drainage improvements primarily within City- owned ROW in the Duwamish neighborhood. These improvements are anticipated to begin construction in mid summer of 2001. In view of Comprehensive Plan neighborhood revitalization goals, Public Works and Planning Division staff identified an opportunity to explore the feasibility of upgrading the streetscape in coordination with the Val -vue project. The goal was to effectively piggyback street and pedestrian amenities onto the utility project so that the streets would only be torn up once. This would be one of several steps the City would take to implement City goals to improve and energize residential neighborhoods. Duwamish Existing Conditions The Duwamish neighborhood was annexed from King County in 1989 along with Allentown and Foster Point. Because it was developed under King County jurisdiction, Duwamish infrastructure does not meet minimum City development standards. Substandard water facilities and no sanitary sewer facilities have led to a virtual moratorium on building and redevelopment permits in Duwamish. The majority of streets have a ROW width of 40 feet but are paved to about 20 feet. There is no coordinated sidewalk system and the lack of curb, gutter and storm drainage facilities results in frequent flooding of those walkways that do exist. Electrical and telephone utility poles and overhead lines are located on both sides of the street. Val -vue Improvements The Val -vue project will provide basic water and sewer infrastructure in line with City development standards. Minimal storm drainage catchbasins and storm pipe will be installed. Associated surface ROW improvements will involve in -kind replacement of pavement to the former 20 foot width. There will be no curbs or sidewalks added and the streets will continue below City standards after Val -vue improvements are completed. Utility poles will remain as currently sited. Page 1 of 3 Staff Proposed Improvements Based on conceptual designs, staff has determined that a range of additional street and pedestrian improvements are feasible in terms of both the Val -vue construction schedule and estimated capital costs. Conceptual alternatives generated include: • Concrete curb and gutter (both sides of street) • Concrete sidewalks (one or both sides) • On- street parking (one or both sides) • Additional storm drainage improvements • Water quality facilities per Department of Ecology guidelines • Consolidation of utility poles /lines on one side of ROW Neighborhood Livability Impacts • Raised curbs and improved storm drainage will direct storm water to catchbasins and additional storm pipes. This will clean up the mud and standing water that currently accumulates on walks and along street edges. Pedestrians will be less likely to be splashed by passing cars or to traverse puddles to access cars. • Raised concrete sidewalks, curbs will define the street edge. The widening of the streets will result in a more open feel to the neighborhood and allow for more organized parking of cars. This will result in a more inviting neighborhood when viewed both from the street and from within homes. • Driveway accesses will be formalized using curb cuts. This will result in more definition between driveways accessing homes and lawn edges near driveways. • Utility poles and lines will be consolidated on one side of the ROW. This will provide an affordable alternative to undergrounding utilities while improving neighborhood aesthetics. Aside from the physical improvements to the neighborhood, the streetscape can play a pivotal role in creating a sense of quality, pride and community in residential neighborhoods. Sidewalks provide not only a circulation network for pedestrians but can serve as a meeting place for neighbors and a play area for children.' In Duwamish, the pedestrian amenities will provide a safer, more walkable street environment on a scale in keeping with neighborhood character. With this in mind, it is likely that more people will be seen using the sidewalks. There may also be more "eyes on the street ", improving neighborhood safety in general. Using the Public Right of Way to create this sense of quality, pride and community is not a new idea. The concept is that an improvement in pedestrian amenities, and "curb appeal" may result in complementary property owner investments. These are anticipated to have a snowball effect, resulting in the gradual improvement of housing quality, increased owner- occupied housing and infill development in residential neighborhoods. Overall, the proposed project provides an opportunity to cost - effectively demonstrate the City's commitment to residential neighborhoods and quality of life issues. It affords a means wherein established residential neighborhoods that are below City standards can be improved economically in conjunction with utility projects. This project could serve as a pilot project for other similar opportunities in Tukwila. For example, 1 American Society of Civil Engineers, National Association of Home Builders, Urban Land Institute, Residential Streets, ASCE, NAHB, ULI, 1990 Page 2 of 3 • • similar utility projects are scheduled for Allentown and Foster Point in late 2001 and 2003 respectively. Capital Cost and Funding Preliminary estimates for the City of Tukwila Street Improvements indicate a cost range of $350,000 - $450,000 *, depending on the conceptual design chosen. Funding for the Val -vue portion of the project is via a Public Works Trust Fund loan repaid through an interlocal agreement between the City and Val -vue. Funding for the additional staff proposed improvements is available utilizing existing funding allocated in the 6 -year Financial Planning Model. There is potential for reimbursement of approximately $100,000 in costs through Community Development Block Grant funds for neighborhood capital projects. A detailed funding proposal is being developed and will be submitted to the Tukwila City Council before final project approval. Next Steps 1. The Utilities Committee of the City Council approves DCD and Public Works scheduling a neighborhood meeting to determine interest in the proposal and to further refine the conceptual streetscape design. 2. Public comments from the meeting will be incorporated into the final proposal and circulated to council. 3. DCD and Public Works will bring the refined conceptual design and funding details to the COW on May 29th for approval. The final conceptual design will then go to Val -vue's design consultant for final design. 4. Together, the Val -vue and City portions of the combined project will go to bid later this summer. * including design costs Page 3 of 3 • • KING COUNTY CDBG CONSORTIUM 2002 CDBG Pass - through City Project Application 1. Project Number and Title: u , un./ ,, IDuwa.vv, tsh Ne.c 6�hrt 1 er`� s 2. Project Location (street address and jurisdiction): 3. Project Summary: cr� lve- C -(0 F �� <<� ll vs,e_ �v2 e.b 6G pass -I h,r(3- h go vi 4. National Objective A. Citation (This is a menu — please keep the applicable citation and delete the rest) Low /Mod Income Area Benefit Area Benefit Activities Low /Mod Income Limited Clientele 208(a)(2)(i)(A) Limited Clientele - Presumed Benefit (identify the population) 208 (a)(2)(i) Limited Clientele Removal of Architectural Barriers 208(a)(2)(i)(B) Limited Clientele - Agency maintains proof 51 % of clients assisted are low /mod income 208(a)(2)(i)(C) Limited Clientele - Agency verifies income of assisted clients 208(a)(2)(i)(D) Limited Clientele - Nature and Location Low /Mod Income Housing 208(a)(3) Housing Activity 208(a)(3)(ii) Housing Activity — Rental Rehab Support 208(a)(3) Housing Activity — Housing Services Page 1 Low /Mod Income Jobs 208(a)(4) Job Creation /Retention Slum /Blight 208(b)(2) Slum and Blight — spot basis Other 208(d)(4) Planning and Administration B. Explanation (attach required documentation /records) 5. Eligible Activity (This is a menu of common activities — please keep the applicable citation and delete the rest) 201(a) Acquisition 201(c) Public Facilities and Improvements 201(e) Public Services 201(i) Relocation 201(n) Direct Homeowneship Assistance 202 Rehabilitation 203(b) Direct Economic Development Assistance 205 Planning 206 Program Administration 6. Subrecipient Page 2 • 7. Line Item Budget Personnel Services (detail below) $ Office or Operating Supplies $ Consultant or Purchased Services $ Construction Contracts Communications $ Travel and Training $ Other (specify below): b) Total Pass - through City Funds: $ 8. Personnel Detail Position Title Position Full Time Equivalent Annual Salary and Benefits CDBG Funds 4th Quarter OCT. — DEC. Total in Year 2002 No. of unduplicated households / persons assisted Total: b) 9. Accomplishments Performance Measures (for public services and housing repair projects) Number Served Units of Service 1 st Quarter JAN. — MARCH 2nd Quarter APRIL — JUNE 3rd Quarter JULY — SEPT. 4th Quarter OCT. — DEC. Total in Year 2002 No. of unduplicated households / persons assisted Units of Service Page 3 1St Quarter JAN. — MARCH 2nd Quarter APRIL— JUNE 3rd Quarter JULY — SEPT. 4th Quarter OCT. — DEC. Total in Year 2002 a) b) Page 3 c) I 1 I Provide a definition for each type of service identified in the Unites of Service table above: a) b) c) Construction Project Schedule Task Projected Completion Date Design Begun 2/02 Design Complete Pass - through City certification and any amendments to 2002 program due to County Complete environmental review Bid Specs Submitted to County Bid Opening Submit 2003 project applications to County with summary sheet, contingency plan, evidence of public hearing and Council authorization Preconstruction Conference Notice to Proceed 4/30/02; 10/30/02; Construction 50% Complete Submit final quarter report and voucher Construction Complete Release Retainage Planning /Admin Project Milestones Task Projected Completion Date Participate in Annual Pass - through City Meeting 2/02 Pass - through City certification and any amendments to 2002 program due to County Review 2003 project applications• for consistency with CDBG Program Regulations, Consortium -wide requirements, and city requirements and hold public hearing Submit 2003 project applications to County with summary sheet, contingency plan, evidence of public hearing and Council authorization 9/27/02 Submit quarterly reports and vouchers 4/30/02; 10/30/02; 7/30/02; Submit final quarter report and voucher Page 4 (Evelyn Boykan 02 PTC app instructions.doc • Page 111 KING COUNTY CDBG CONSORTIUM Instructions for Completing 2002 CDBG Pass - through City Project Applications Project Applications are not required for allocation of funds to the King County Housing Repair Program or ARCH. Complete a Project Application for all other projects listed on the summary sheet. Applications do not need to be signed. Attach a copy of related application forms submitted to your city, if available. 1. Project Number and Title. Number each project scope in sequence. The numbers should correspond to the summary sheet. Enter a brief but descriptive title. The first word in the title should be your city. 2. Project Location. List the project street address (not the address of the agency). 3. Project Summary. Make sure that items A -D listed below are included in all descriptions, and that components E -G are included if applicable to the project. These descriptions are used to screen the project for eligibility, make environmental review decisions and prepare contract scopes. A. Identify the subrecipient, how the CDBG funds will be used and the location or service area. "The City of Q will use 2001 CDBG Pass - through funds to design and construct 1,090 linear feet of sidewalk, curb and gutters at nine locations in the P neighborhood." "The City of L will use 2001 CDBG Pass - through funds to subcontract with Agency T to provide food bank services to residents of L ". B. Specif r�the expected accomplishments of the project in measurable terms as follows: The following performance measures are required for IDIS: • lineal feet for sidewalk or utility line public improvement projects • unduplicated number of persons or households served annually for public service projects • unduplicated number of households assisted for housing repair projects or homeownership assistance • number of units assisted for housing development projects Page 1 Evelyn Boykan - 02 PIC app instructions.doc Page 21 C. Be sure that your description references what the funds will actually be used for, such as personnel services (number of FTE's), office or operating supplies, construction contracts, etc. Make sure this statement agrees with the information provided in item 8 Line Item Budget. D. If the project is a continuation of a previously funded public service project„ please say so. mn Q�D�CA'r`1,1)0"cflo f E. if you are adding funds to a prior year's capital project which is still active, identify the active project by title and project number. Please keep in mind, agencies are not allowed to use 2001 funds to cover costs incurred in 2000 or prior years. F. Consistency with Consortium -wide Policies in the Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan, Appendix B. • Policy 1— CDBG Public Improvement Projects requires CDBG- funded public improvement projects to be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and /or capital improvement program of the jurisdiction in which the project is located. In addition, CDBG- funded public improvement projects involving accessibility improvements for persons with disabilities must be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, capital improvement program and /or the ADA/504 corrective action plan of the jurisdiction in which the project is located. Please identify, in the Project Summary, the appropriate comprehensive plan, capital improvement program and /or the ADA/504 corrective action plan. • Policy 4 — CDBG Public Facility ADA Projects requires CDBG- funded community facility projects involving accessibility improvements for persons with disabilities to be consistent with the ADA/504 corrective action plan of the property owner or, in the case of a leased facility, each tenant agency whose clientele is intended to benefit from the project. Please identify, in the Project Summary, the appropriate ADA/504 corrective action plan. • Policy 7 - Application Requirements for CDBG Community Facility Projects Involving Improvements to Leased Facilities requires applications submitted by nonprofit organizations requesting CDBG funding to improve a leased property to include a copy of the executed. Please include a copy of the lease for any projects involving improvements to a leased facility. G. Indicate whether the project meets the criteria in the ESA Section 7 No Effects Checklist. Note, the application does not require you to identify other sources of funds for each project. This information will be provided on a Project Funding Report form submitted with the final voucher request. Page 2 Evelyn Boykan 02 PTC app instruction doc Page 3 4. National Objective A. Citation. Refer to the CDBG Guide if you need assistance in determining the correct citation. B. Explanation. Provide a narrative explanation for the category you selected along with copies of supporting documents /records that are required by the CDBG Program Regulations. For Low /Mod Income Area Benefit Projects: a) Attach a map of the project service area b) Identify Census Tracts /Block Groups in the project service area c) Indicate the percent low /mod population in the project service area -- d) Describe how the project service area was determined. For Low /Mod Income Limited Clientele — Nature and Location: a) Describe how the nature and location of the activity establishes that it will be used predominantly by low /mod income persons. For Slum /Blight - Spot Basis: a) Describe for each structure proposed for assistance, the specific conditions that pose a threat to public health and safety (this should be a memo from your City's building official or code enforcement officer describing code deficiencies) 5. Eligible Activity. Refer to the CDBG Guide if you need assistance in determining the correct category. 6. Subrecipient . Please complete this section with information for the appropriate city department if the city intends to implement the project under a contract with King County. (Note: For human service projects where the city will subcontract with another agency, the agency should be identified in the project summary, not as the subrecipient.) Please complete this section with information for the nonprofit organization for each project that the city intends to have a nonprofit implement under a contract with King County. 7. Line Item Budget. Indicate how the CDBG funds awarded for the project will be used. • It is not necessary to fill out a separate budget page for human service projects where the city will subcontract with another agency. The budget for such projects should be listed as a lump sum under the line item Consultant or Other Purchased Services. • The acquisition of equipment is only eligible as a public service project. Equipment (non - expendable personal property) is defined as having a useful life of more than one year. For cities, an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit applies, unless the City has its own definition which is more restrictive, in which case the more restrictive definition Page 3 Evelyn Boykan - 02 PTC app instruction Page 41 applies. For private nonprofits, an acquisition cost of $5,000 applies. Examples include, but are not limited to, vehicles, laboratory, medical, and recreation equipment. Less expensive equipment is now considered office supplies. • Other -- This category includes those costs not otherwise detailed above, such as building leases, insurance, deferred payment loans, and relocation costs. 8. Personnel Details Complete this section for agency staff whose time will paid for in whole or in part with CDBG funds. Fringe benefits (FICA, Retirement, and Medical, Dental, and Industrial Insurance) may either be included in the salary of each position or added separately. Be sure to include fringe benefits in the "TOTALS" line, and be sure the "CDBG FUNDS TOTALS" equals the figure in item 7 above. 9. Accomplishments and Schedules The Project Application form includes the following alternative accomplishment sections: • Performance Measures (for public services and housing repair projects); • Construction Project Schedule; • Planning /admin Project Milestones; and • Acquisition Project Schedule. Please select and complete the accomplishment section appropriate for each project. Page 4 KING COUNTY ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE ACTIVITIES 1. ACQUISITION Check all that apply ❑ Property acquisition only. ❑ Acquisition of an existing building and associated site. ❑ Acquisition of an existing building and associated site and rehabilitation activities. 2. INTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES Check all that apply Weatherization: ❑ New windows ❑ New doors ❑ Insulation 0 Ventilation Structural: ❑ Interior wall removal 0 Interior wall replacement ❑ Foundation work (inside existing foundation Plumbing: ❑ Replumb internal fixtures /pipes ❑ Update kitchen ❑ Update bath ❑ Update laundry ❑ Add new kitchen, bath or laundry Cosmetic: ❑ Painting ❑ Resurface floors (carpet, vinyl, etc.) ❑ Repair drywall ❑ Repair mill work Replacements: 0 Appliances 0 Cabinets Abatement: ❑ Remove asbestos ❑ Encapsulate asbestos ❑ Encapsulate lead -based paint Electrical: ❑ Rewire ❑ Add new service ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 5 of 7 July 17, 2001 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE 3. EXTERIOR REHABILTATION ACTIVITIES Site is located greater than 300 feet from any waterbody Additional requirements to qualify for a "no effects" determination" ❑ Include a site plan with project area clearly identified. ❑ Include a USGS 71/2 minute quadrangle map with location of the property circled. ❑ Include Thomas Brothers Guide with location of property circled. List the edition, year, page number, and grid coordinates. ❑ Include a design sketch. Check all that apply Roof: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair Cosmetic: ❑ Painting Structural: ❑ Resize /replace windows ❑ Repair exterior walls ❑ New windows or doors ❑ Foundation work - minor improvements • New bathroom • New bedroom Siding: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair ❑ Reside over existing siding Landscaping: ❑ New plantings ❑ Repair fencing ❑ Replace fencing ❑ New fencing ❑ Repair play area ❑ New play area Impervious Surface - Repair and improvements: ❑ Patching, resurfacing or resealing, new — minor Improvements Handicap access ramps Single parking space Single family driveway Single family sidewalk Use of on -site infiltration or pervious surface materials. Drainage: Existing Onsite Detention or existing connection to storm sewer ❑ Repair existing ❑ Replace existing Oil Tank: Decommissioning: ❑ Closed in place according to the Uniform Fire Code Section 7902.1.7.2.3. Sewer /Septic: ❑ Repair ❑ Replace Water line: ❑ Repair ❑ Replace ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 6 of 7 July 17, 2001 KING COUNTY ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE 4. EXTERIOR REHABILTATION ACTIVITIES Site is located less than 300 feet from any waterbody Additional requirements to qualify for a "no effects" determination" ❑ Include a site plan with project area clearly identified. ❑ Include a USGS 71/2 minute quadrangle map with location of the property circled. ❑ Include Thomas Brothers Guide with location of property circled. List the edition, year, page number, and grid coordinates. ❑ Include a design sketch. Check all that apply Roof: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair Siding: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair ❑ Re -side over existing Structural: ❑ Resize /replace windows ❑ Repair exterior walls ❑ New windows or doors Cosmetic: ❑ Brush /Roller Painting ❑ Spray Painting - Only when no wind is present Landscaping in existing areas only: ❑ New plantings - Native plants only ❑ Repair fencing ❑ Replace fencing — Excluding bulkheads ❑ New fencing ❑ Repair play area ❑ New play area Oil Tank Decommissioning: ❑ Closed in place according to the Uniform Fire Code Section 7902.1.7.2.3. ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 7 of 7 July 17, 2001 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE INTRODUCTION All King County projects that are authorized by a federal agency, receive federal funding or require a federal permit are required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to evaluate the impacts (if any) of a proposed project or action on listed species. Because King County is a pass through agency for the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grant funding, projects funded by King County using federal dollars are subject to Section 7 requirements. The King County ESA Policy Coordination Office and the King County Department of Housing and Community Services (DCHS) have worked in close association with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Services) to identify activities typically conducted by DCHS grant recipients that would clearly have "no effects" on listed species. Activities that meet all of the following criteria and provide the required documentation to DCHS, need not engage in consultation with the Services. QUALIFICATIONS FOR "NO EFFECTS" DETERMINATION The following checklist: 1) identifies activities that will not harm species listed as threatened or endangered; and 2) provides documentation for a determination of "no effects" to listed species; under ESA Section 7. Four types of activities are addressed in the following checklist: ❑ Acquisition of Property ❑ Interior Rehabilitation ❑ Exterior Rehabilitation — site is greater than 300 feet from any waterbody ❑ Exterior Rehabilitation — site is less than 300 feet from any waterbody For an activity to qualify as having "no effects" on listed species under this checklist it must meet requirements described on page 4. Projects that require permits listed on page 4 or that will engage in activities not listed on pages 5 -7 DO NOT QUALIFY to use this checklist. Activities that do not qualify to use this checklist require the completion of a King County Section 7 Assessment Form and evaluation of potential project impacts on listed species. For information on how to evaluate potential project impacts on listed species contact: Sandy Gurkewitz of the ESA Policy Coordination Office at (206) 684 -1269. If you believe your project qualifies for a "no effects" determination under this checklist, please complete the following checklist and check all boxes that apply. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 1 of 7 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE INSTRUCTIONS ❑ For projects engaging in ACQUISITION and /or any INTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES but no EXTERNAL REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES complete the following: Page 3 — "General Project Information" — complete boxes 1 -9 Page 3 — "Project Description " — briefly describe the activities you will be engaging in and when they will occur. Page 4 — "Requirements to Qualify for a "No Effects Determination" Page 5 — "Acquisition" Page 5 — "Interior Rehabilitation Activities" ❑ For projects engaging in any EXTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES complete the following: Page 3 — "General Project Information" — complete boxes 1 -15 Page 3 — "Project Description" — briefly describe the activities you will be engaging in and when they will occur. Describe the project area and existing site conditions in or near the project area. Describe general construction methods and sequencing (including temporary or permanent access, staging areas, stock piles, etc.) Page 4 — "Requirements to Qualify for a "No Effects Determination" Page 6 or 7 — "Exterior Rehabilitation Activities" Submit completed "No Effects" checklist and supporting documentation to: King County, Housing and Community Development Manager, Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle 98104 -1598. Completed forms will be reviewed by the Housing and Community Development Manager to confirm that your project will have no impacts on listed species. You will receive written confirmation that your project qualifies for a "no effects" determination. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 2 of 7 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Name 9. Project Street Address 2. KC Department 10. Project City, Zip Code 3. KC Division 11. WRIA # 4. KC Section 12. Section 5. DCHS Project Manager 13. Range 6. DCHS Project Manager Phone 14. Township 7. Contact/Sponsor 15. Proximity to Water ❑ < 300 feet from water body ❑ > 300 feet from waterbody 8. Contact Phone 16. Name of Nearest Waterbody PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please provide a brief description of your project. Use additional paper if needed and attach to these forms. ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 3 of 7 July 17, 2001 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE REQUIREMENTS TO QUALIFY FOR A "NO EFFECTS" DETERMINATION 1. PERMIT THRESHOLD Projects requiring the following State, Federal, King County or equivalent local permits "may effect" listed species and do not qualify to use this checklist. ❑ Clearing And Grading Permit ❑ ❑ Floodplain Development Permit ❑ Demolition Permit ❑ ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development Permit ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval 2. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS Underground Storage Tank Notification Requirement — (notification of new tank installation) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual or Nationwide 404 Permit or Section 10 Permit ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) ❑ NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit ❑ Water Quality Certification (401) Projects that do not require the above permits must meet the following to qualify for use of the "no effects" checklist. ❑ No additional stormwater run -off will be generated or conveyed to drainage ditches or receiving waterbodies. ❑ Staging area (parking /storage of equipment and materials) will: • Be located on a paved or graveled surface or surface stabilized to minimize erosion and tracking mud. • Prevent stormwater contamination by storing liquid materials, erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers and by covering building, landscaping and waste materials. • Prevent stormwater from running on to an area storing liquid materials erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers, building, landscaping and waste materials by use of a curb, berm, or dike. • Use appropriate stormwater runoff control mechanisms. These activities will be carried out using the practices described in the King County Sotrmwater Pollution Control Manual (See Activity Sheets 1 -3, & A -29; BMP Information Sheets 3 & 5). ❑ No heavy mechanical disturbance to soils or vegetation will be made to the site. O No trees or riparian vegetation will be removed from the site. O All construction, demolition, dangerous wastes and hazardous wastes as defined in King County Code (K.C.C) Chapter 10.04 will be managed in accordance with K.C.C. 10.10.030 and taken to a certified solid waste or hazardous waste facility. Additional requirements are described for each type of activity and proximity of the project to water. These requirements must be met, in addition to the above requirements, for an activity to qualify as having "no effects" on listed species. 3. PROJECTS THAT "MAY AFFECT" LISTED SPECIES If your project: a) does not meet the requirements specified above and does not meet additional requirements described below or b) requires any of the above listed permits, your project "may affect" listed species. Projects that "may affect listed species require the completion of a King County Section 7 Assessment Form and analysis of potential impacts to listed species. Contact Sandy Gurkewitz of the ESA Policy Coordination Office at (206) 684 -1269 for more information. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 4 of 7 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE ACTIVITIES 1. ACQUISITION Check all that apply ❑ Property acquisition only. ❑ Acquisition of an existing building and associated site. ❑ Acquisition of an existing building and associated site and rehabilitation activities. 2. INTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES Check all that apply Weatherization: ❑ New windows ❑ New doors ❑ Insulation 0 Ventilation Structural: ❑ Interior wall removal 0 Interior wall replacement ❑ Foundation work (inside existing foundation Plumbing: ❑ Replumb internal fixtures /pipes ❑ Update kitchen ❑ Update bath ❑ Update laundry ❑ Add new kitchen, bath or laundry Cosmetic: ❑ Painting ❑ Resurface floors (carpet, vinyl, etc.) ❑ Repair drywall ❑ Repair mill work Replacements: 0 Appliances 0 Cabinets Abatement: ❑ Remove asbestos ❑ Encapsulate asbestos ❑ Encapsulate lead -based paint Electrical: ❑ Rewire ❑ Add new service ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 5of7 July 17, 2001 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE 3. EXTERIOR REHABILTATION ACTIVITIES Site is located greater than 300 feet from any waterbody Additional requirements to qualify for a "no effects" determination" ❑ Include a site plan with project area clearly identified. ❑ Include a USGS TA minute quadrangle map with location of the property circled. ❑ Include Thomas Brothers Guide with location of property circled. List the edition, year, page number, and grid coordinates. ❑ Include a design sketch. Check all that apply Roof: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair Cosmetic: ❑ Painting Structural: ❑ Resize /replace windows ❑ Repair exterior walls ❑ New windows or doors ❑ Foundation work - minor improvements • New bathroom • New bedroom Siding: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair ❑ Reside over existing siding Landscaping: ❑ New plantings ❑ Repair fencing ❑ Replace fencing ❑ New fencing ❑ Repair play area ❑ New play area Impervious Surface - Repair and improvements: ❑ Patching, resurfacing or resealing, new — minor Improvements Handicap access ramps Single parking space Single family driveway Single family sidewalk Use of on -site infiltration or pervious surface materials. Drainage: Existing Onsite Detention or existing connection to storm sewer ❑ Repair existing ❑ Replace existing Oil Tank: Decommissioning: ❑ Closed in place according to the Uniform Fire Code Section 7902.1.7.2.3. Sewer /Septic: ❑ Repair ❑ Replace Water line: ❑ Repair ❑ Replace ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 6 of 7 July 17, 2001 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE 4. EXTERIOR REHABILTATION ACTIVITIES Site is located less than 300 feet from any waterbody Additional requirements to qualify for a "no effects" determination" o Include a site plan with project area clearly identified. ❑ Include a USGS 71/2 minute quadrangle map with location of the property circled. ❑ Include Thomas Brothers Guide with location of property circled. List the edition, year, page number, and grid coordinates. ❑ Include a design sketch. Check all that apply Roof: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair Siding: ❑ Replace ❑ Repair ❑ Re -side over existing Structural: ❑ Resize /replace windows ❑ Repair exterior walls ❑ New windows or doors Cosmetic: ❑ Brush /Roller Painting ❑ Spray Painting - Only when no wind is present Landscaping in existing areas only: ❑ New plantings - Native plants only ❑ Repair fencing ❑ Replace fencing — Excluding bulkheads o New fencing ❑ Repair play area ❑ New play area Oil Tank Decommissioning: ❑ Closed in place according to the Uniform Fire Code Section 7902.1.7.2.3. ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 7 of 7 July 17, 2001 KING COUNTY ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE INTRODUCTION All King County projects that are authorized by a federal agency, receive federal funding or require a federal permit are required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to evaluate the impacts (if any) of a proposed project or action on listed species. Because King County is a pass through agency for the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grant funding, projects funded by King County using federal dollars are subject to Section 7 requirements. The King County ESA Policy Coordination Office and the King County Department of Housing and Community Services (DCHS) have worked in close association with the National Marine Fisheries Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Services) to identify activities typically conducted by DCHS grant recipients that would clearly have "no effects" on listed species. Activities that meet all of the following criteria and provide the required documentation to DCHS, need not engage in consultation with the Services. QUALIFICATIONS FOR "NO EFFECTS" DETERMINATION The following checklist: 1) identifies activities that will not harm species listed as threatened or endangered; and 2) provides documentation for a determination of "no effects" to listed species; under ESA Section 7. Four types of activities are addressed in the following checklist: ❑ Acquisition of Property ❑ Interior Rehabilitation ❑ Exterior Rehabilitation — site is greater than 300 feet from any waterbody ❑ Exterior Rehabilitation — site is less than 300 feet from a waterbody For an activity to qualify as having "no effects" on listed species under this checklist it must meet requirements described on page 4. Projects that require permits listed on page 4 or that will engage in activities not listed on pages 5 -7 DO NOT QUALIFY to use this checklist. Activities that do not qualify to use this checklist require the completion of a King County Section 7 Assessment Form and evaluation of potential project impacts on listed species. For information on how to evaluate potential project impacts on listed species contact: Sandy Gurkewitz of the ESA Policy Coordination Office at (206) 684 -1269. If you believe your project qualifies for a "no effects" determination under this checklist, please complete the following checklist and check all boxes that apply. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 1 of 7 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE INSTRUCTIONS ❑ For projects engaging in ACQUISITION and /or any INTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES but no EXTERNAL REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES complete the following: Page 3 — "General Project Information" — complete boxes 1 -9 Page 3 — "Project Description " — briefly describe the activities you will be engaging in and when they will occur. Page 4 — "Requirements to Qualify for a "No Effects Determination" Page 5 — "Acquisition" Page 5 — "Interior Rehabilitation Activities" ❑ For projects engaging in any EXTERIOR REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES complete the following: Page 3 — "General Project Information" — complete boxes 1 -15 Page 3 — "Project Description" — briefly describe the activities you will be engaging in and when they will occur. Describe the project area and existing site conditions in or near the project area. Describe general construction methods and sequencing (including temporary or permanent access, staging areas, stock piles, etc.) Page 4 — "Requirements to Qualify for a "No Effects Determination" Page 6 or 7 — "Exterior Rehabilitation Activities" Submit completed "No Effects" checklist and supporting documentation to: King County, Housing and Community Development Manager, Exchange Building 821 Second Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle 98104 -1598. Completed forms will be reviewed by the Housing and Community Development Manager to confirm that your project will have no impacts on listed species. You will receive written confirmation that your project qualifies for a "no effects" determination. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 2 of 7 ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Name 9. Project Street Address 2. KC Department 10. Project City, Zip Code 3. KC Division 11. WRIA # 4. KC Section 12. Section 5. DCHS Project Manager 13. Range 6. DCHS Project Manager Phone 14. Township 7. Contact/Sponsor 15. Proximity to Water ❑ < 300 feet from water body ❑ > 300 feet from waterbody 8. Contact Phone 16. Name of Nearest Waterbody PROJECT DESCRIPTION Please provide a brief description of your project. Use additional paper if needed and attach to these forms. ESA Policy Coordination Office Page 3 of 7 July 17, 2001 KING COUNTY ACTIVITIES THAT HAVE "NO EFFECTS" TO LISTED SPECIES UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT REGARDLESS OF SPECIES PRESENCE REQUIREMENTS TO QUALIFY FOR A "NO EFFECTS" DETERMINATION 1. PERMIT THRESHOLD Projects requiring the following State, Federal, King County or equivalent local permits "may effect" listed species and do not qualify to use this checklist. ❑ Clearing And Grading Permit ❑ Floodplain Development Permit o Demolition Permit ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development Permit o Coastal Zone Management Certification ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval 2. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ❑ Underground Storage Tank Notification Requirement — (notification of new tank installation) ❑ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Individual or Nationwide 404 Permit or Section 10 Permit ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) ❑ NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit ❑ Water Quality Certification (401) Projects that do not require the above permits must meet the following to qualify for use of the "no effects" checklist. ❑ No additional stormwater run -off will be generated or conveyed to drainage ditches or receiving waterbodies. ❑ Staging area (parking /storage of equipment and materials) will: • Be located on a paved or graveled surface or surface stabilized to minimize erosion and tracking mud. • Prevent stormwater contamination by storing liquid materials, erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers and by covering building, landscaping and waste materials. • Prevent stormwater from running on to an area storing liquid materials erodable materials, pesticides and fertilizers, building, landscaping and waste materials by use of a curb, berm, or dike. • Use appropriate stormwater runoff control mechanisms. These activities will be carried out using the practices described in the King County Sotrmwater Pollution Control Manual (See Activity Sheets 1 -3, & A -29; BMP Information Sheets 3 & 5). ❑ No heavy mechanical disturbance to soils or vegetation will be made to the site. ❑ No trees or riparian vegetation will be removed from the site. ❑ All construction, demolition, dangerous wastes and hazardous wastes as defined in King County Code (K.C.C) Chapter 10.04 will be managed in accordance with K.C.C. 10.10.030 and taken to a certified solid waste or hazardous waste facility. Additional requirements are described for each type of activity and proximity of the project to water. These requirements must be met, in addition to the above requirements, for an activity to qualify as having "no effects" on listed species. 3. PROJECTS THAT "MAY AFFECT" LISTED SPECIES If your project: a) does not meet the requirements specified above and does not meet additional requirements described below or b) requires any of the above listed permits, your project "may affect" listed species. Projects that "may affect listed species require the completion of a King County Section 7 Assessment Form and analysis of potential impacts to listed species. Contact Sandy Gurkewitz of the ESA Policy Coordination Office at (206) 684 -1269 for more information. ESA Policy Coordination Office July 17, 2001 Page 4 of 7 CITY Bothell Burien Covington Des Moines Enumclaw Federal Way Issaquah Kent Kirkland Lake Forest Park Mercer Island Redmond Renton SeaTac Shoreline Tukwila TOTAL CITIES Co & Sm Cities 1/ Based on a 2002 entitlement of $7,303,000 and program income of $1,539,993 an administrative setaside of $1,126,414 and a public services setaside of C O (c, •waw15 of Consortium's LOW /MOD POP 0.02531 0.03786 0.01177 0.03712 0.01624 0.08643 0.00876 0.09200 0.04927 0.00974 0.00986 0.04289 0.06344 0.03292 0.05703 0.02420 0.60485 0.39515 ENTITLEMENT SHARE 1/ 148,733 222,506 69,143 218,165 95,430 507,915 51,502 540,665 289,531 57,259 57,923 252,057 372,793 193,461 335,136 142,237 3,554,456 2,322,129 RECAPTURED PROGRAM FUNDS 2/ INCOME 3/ 10,853 18,844 4,953 5,132 7,655 60,508 4,481 42,486 17,112 168 170 29,756 18,489 68,949 27,982 39,121 356,659 975,811 TOTAL SHARE 159,586 241,350 74,096 223,297 103,085 568,423 55,983 583,151 306,643 57,427 58,093 281,813 391,282 262,410 363,118 1181,358t 3,911,115 3,297,940 PUBLIC PLANNING SERVICE & ADMIN 25,979 21,109 38,865 31,579 12,077 9,813 38,106 30,963 16,668 13,544 88,716 72,085 8,996 7,309 94,437 76,733 50,572 41,091 10,001 8,126 10,117 8,221 44,026 35,773 65,115 52,908 33,791 27,457 58,537 7,563 24,844 40,187 620,847 504,461 405,602 329,559 tb n04- i vn clode. e.0 rre_n t ' ( .idevaC) - c_Aet(. 1/4..90 een Fvnc(s BALANCE AVAIL. 112,498 170,906 52,206 154,228 72,873 407,622 39,678_ 411,981 214,980 39,300 39,755 202,014 273,259 201,162 257,0 136,327 • Eligible Community Development Block Grant Projects Acquisition of Real Property- Acquisition of property for any public purpose including land, air rights, easements, water rights, rights of way, buildings and other real property improvements or other interests in real property. Public Facilities and Improvement - Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and installation . This includes streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, parks, playgrounds, water and sewer lines, flood and drainage improvements, parking . lots, utilities and aesthetic amenities on public property. Those facilities that are designed for providing shelter for persons having special needs are considered to be public facilities (and not permanent housing). Buildings for the general conduct of government are not eligible. Also can include removal of architectural barriers in existing infrastructure to improve access for persons with disabilities. Clearance — Demolition of buildings and improvements, removal of demolition projects, physical removal of environmental contaminants or treatment of contaminants and movement of structures of other sites. Public Services — New service or quantifiable increase in service - Includes but not limited to childcare, health care, job training, recreation, education programs, public safety services, fair housing activities, services for seniors, homeless people, drug abuse counseling, energy conservation, etc. May not exceed 15% of total grant award for public service project. Interim Assistance — The execution of special (beyond that normally provided) garbage, trash and debris removal including neighborhood clean -up campaigns. Rehabilitation — Includes security devises, conservation measures, waters and sewers and historic preservation. Special Economic Development — Includes job creation and retention (for low to moderate income individuals), establishment, stabilization and expansion of small business, mortgage financing for low income persons. Assistance to private for profit entities for an activity determined by grantee to carry out an Eligible Community Development Block Grant ProjectsError! Cannot open data source.development project is allowable. It can include grants loans, loan guarantees, interest supplements and technical assistance. Microenterprise Assistance — Projects to support the types of businesses that a city wants to attract and sustain. This can include childcare, transportation, counseling, peer support. Business would have to have 5 or fewer employees. • • Homeownership Assistance - Subsidized interest rates and mortgage principal amounts, payment of part or all mortgage insurance premium, reasonable closing costs, down payment assistance. Planning and capacity building, studies, analyses, data gathering, preparation of plans including comprehensive plans, capital improvement programs, small area and neighborhoods-plans. This cannot include engineering and architectural design costs. Planning and Administration - Assess community development needs and ensure compliance with applicable federal regulations. Can include human services needs assessments, housing and community development needs assessments, technical assistance to public and nonprofit agencies on development of outcome measures, economic development plans and general administration of the CDBG. Opinion of Probable Cost Job No. Date 0.00 # # # # ## ## ## ITEIv :. NO DESCRIPT ION NO, UNITS UN['IsPRICI HIGH LQ \V AVG • PRICE ;ASSUMPTIONS /COMMENTS': COST • SITE PREPARATION 10.003 ▪ 10.005 • 10.010 Removal of Cement Cone. Sidewalk Clearing and Grubbing Borrow Excavation STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS 1500 SY 10.00 10.00 10.00 SY 10.00 1 AC 10,000 10,000 10,000 AC 10,000 1000 CY 10.00 10.00 10.00 CY 10.00 SUBTOTAL SEC : -010- 15,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 35,000.00 30.025 CPEP 12" Diameter 2000 LF 24.00 18.00 21.00 LF 21.00 42,000.00 30.027 CPEP 18" Diameter 1500 LF 35.00 19.00 27.00 LF 27.00 40,500.00 30.036 Type 1 Catchbasin 20 EA 800 800 800 EA 800.00 16,000.00 30.037 Type 11 Catchbasin, 48" Up to 8' Deep 8 EA 2,000 1,700 1,850 EA 1,850 14,800.00 • 30.042 STORMCEPTOR 1 EA 30,000 30,000 30,000 EA 30,000 30,000.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 30.00 143,300.00 ROAD CONSTRUCTION • 40.004 Gravel Base, Class B 600 CY 20.00 20.00 20.00 CY 20.00 12,000.00 40.006 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 200 CY 25.00 25.00 25.00 CY 25.00 5,000.00 40.011 Asphalt Concrete Pavement, CL. B 600 TON 45.00 45.00 45.00 TON 45.00 27,000.00 40.018 Cement Conc. Curb & Gutter (Radii) 5400 LF 12.00 12.00 12.00 LF 12.00 64,800.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 40.00 108,800.00 SIDEWALKS 60.001 Cement Conc. Sidewalk 3000 SY 27.00 27.00 27.00 SY 27.00 81,000.00 • 60.002 Sidewalk (Fine Grade and Compact) 5400 LF 1.00 1.00 1.00 LF 1.00 5,400.00 ' 60.003 Wheelchair Ramps 8 EA 125.00 125.00 125.00 EA 125.00 1,000.00 SUBTOTAL SEC. 60.00 87,400.00 SECTION TOTALS 374,500 G Filename.- Sidewalk 4/26/01 9:18 AM k sl kA,o . c Sc).0 �-. \ - (-( ( UOU. Ov 2 5u Page 1 of 1 P,zo qec [4 cos_ t o 3 l o t Z � tre4, Coo z 8.A-c efi 13 s� � P 4 Uv-e-p1, C2.1 4,4-) 1kt0 ti� q h 64.1t-nn . .0 (zoo t 9 4.ciffris 124 Duwamish Street Estimates Alternative A: $ 184,800 $ 285,650 Issue: utility pole placement Alternative B Alternative C Issue: utility pole Alternative D $ 169,300 $ 169,300 $ 245,150 placement $ 153,800 Two lane roadway w/ staggered parking on both sides // sidewalk both sides Asphalt thickened edge and sidewalk Concrete curb and sidewalk Two lane roadway w/ staggered parking on two sides // sidewalk one side only Asphalt thickened edge and sidewalk Two lane roadway w/ parking both sides // sidewalk one side only Asphalt thickened edge and sidewalk Concrete curb and sidewalk Two lane roadway w/ asphalt thickened edge parking one side only // no sidewalks, pedestrian /bike way defined by- Miles. Overall issues: utility poles: undergrounding, consolidation on on side of street, placement stormwater retention transferability to other neighborhoods - Allentown, Foster Point landscaping could be funded from parks $ Administrative process : timing, design, contract piggyback on Val -vue Political and Public Process iD ( Duwamish Street Estimates Alternatives A & B: $ 285,650 Two lane roadway w/ staggered parking on both sides // sidewalk both sides Concrete curb and sidewalk Alternative C $ 245,150 Two lane roadway w/ parking both sides // sidewalk one side only Concrete curb opposite w/ small utility pole area Issue: utility pole placement Alternative D $ 245,150 Two lane roadway w/ sidewalk and parking one side only // rolled curb opposite Concrete rolled curb opposite. Homeowner's choice for 5ft utility pole area water quality add $100,000 Overall issues: utility poles: undergrounding, consolidation on on side of street, placement transferability to other neighborhoods - Allentown, Foster Point mailboxes Administrative process : timing, design, contract piggyback on Val -vue Political and Public Process • • Duo. • ,Eatistics Property source: King County GIS data Total tax parcels vacant parcels Iandval /impval >1 poor condition remaining homes Redev potential 90 20 22.2% 7 7.8% 4 4.4% 59 65.6% 31 34.4% *none are same parcels as Iandval /impval <1 parcel Lot Size /Area (Sq. Ft.) Under 5,000 5,001- 10,000 10,001- 15,000 15,001- 20,000 20,001- 25,000 25,001- 30,000 30,001- 35,000 35,001- 40,000 40 -001 + Housing homes likely rentals likley owner - occupied housing type single family duplex 3 28 23 11 12 4 1 4 3 Development Potential remaining homes 66% vacant parcels 22% Iandval /impval >1 8% poor condition 4% 70 28 40.0% 42 60.0% 67 95.7% 3 4.3% Neighborhood Character Number of bedrooms 0 1 1.4% 1 5 7.1% 2 29 41.4% 3 20 28.6% 4 12 17.1% 5 3 4.3% 70 size (sq. ft.) 700 or Tess 10 14.3% 701 -1000 19 27.1% 1001 -1200 17 24.3% 1201 -1500 11 15.7% 1501 -2000 10 14.3% 2001 -2500 3 4.3% 70 Stories single storey 48 68.6% 1 and 1/2 story 16 22.9% 2 storey 8 11.4% Age Year built 1900 -1920 19 1921 -1940 21 1941 -1960 22 1961 -1980 6 1980 -2001 1 inclusive 10 14.3% 29 41.4% 46 65.7% 57 81.4% 67 95.7% 70 100.0% 20 15 10 5 Home Size III 1 MIN 11 1 1 111111k 0 co Op ° o° ° ° o N N 6 p O O O O O ^o ^ . sq. ft. 25 20 15 10 5 0 Year Built: Duwamish Homes 1900 -1920 1921 -1940 1941 -1960 1961 -1980 1980 -2001 Condition - would grade be better indicator? CaII KC Ass. poor 4 fair 6 average 34 very good 20 upgrade 5 • • mcs <0 rE ®0 E E? m-4 G3A1333a _ Pit i r ,..... , \ y ""( \ ri ! t i ! r4 -ter — It C \ I ! . \ 1 i ii_ - s — 4 SECTION gg o 1 \ \\''‘. \\\I la ‹ i t I I \\ 1: ; ■ Lii'l t � i i 1 ; F [i rr CI 14 / • / / / •,,, s; % ∎ f I 11 — -rig Ili' hi i. ' ma 4 l.. 1 H I ! , 3 m ii ,y %; i I, i �a l / - /`'F , // " �a °' / �' '' �; / // � � U T I Iuul. #fur rrEtIv t11 1 �.. • i '� §Z / it g F ;,a / e s / - . / is 11 i ._.:_ L I , I I —mr– _- —` -- is m i / / ' 1 f ly `t! - , ���' - / ,/' 1 1 ! n ` i, z7� . :,i..i �f ,' • . II g • ;.' • , I aj j— I ) I I ! I =1 11 • 1I , ni. .1 a !I 4 1 /, , M!I- 1 1' ,; I _ lI� : IQ' r"_ ',, -, . /' � ,�/ / ���' /��/ I 41 i /��'�/ f�_ �rion _1. ..'7r�.W ∎I ..,_1-7„..-i_- �—I GF�. —T w - - p _.,_l y .� ._ _ 6M-36M . i.; wii=-�°:.+- . Lt� SECTION N ,= :: -�..- — y I 1 II 1 I III 1� ,-� II i 1 E l .... I —= �. =t... - /_ '/ 1 �, / I, /� y I jt! 1l /� ®� — — I = I 11 ` I 1 0 C [ 9 SECTION 8 , I I IU 1 = 1. ! •, _ .1 - QD _ . +11' i� +' {{— .._.ms- .. —... , /�. /, I ' %,� .. li+G"" 00[x:: 1 1. ��,/i /F ,1 0 I ! /' �QL `` ► — , [� F — __-,-.2,___._ - ..._... ..r • I o[ 0! {C i 1 • :l II b,p I J I. F I:isecnoN --,,_l 1 I , ILA U IO i R --� �I' I 1 �� ! 1; �� I Gl� ! it ! r ar i I('i� I W v_ ! —h 0 1. t+ I ; "r L' II ,Hj-' I I 03 -I, 1 i I I� �I � 10. NI n.._� �'Io I ri E 4� �i' ; ( I �,.,; II: I 00 1 ii _o I n I .. + R'AM /aN R/Vfj! it is mcs <0 rE ®0 E E? m-4 G3A1333a Duwamish Street Estimates Alternatives A & B: $ 285,650 Alternative C $ 245,150 Issue: utility pole placement Alternative D water quality add -$I 100,000 Overall issues: utility poles: undergrounding, consolidation on on side of street, placement transferability to other neighborhoods - Allentown, Foster Point mailboxes a 15i Two lane roadway w/ staggered parking on both sides // sidewalk both sides Concrete curb and sidewalk Two lane roadway w/ parking both sides l/ sidewalk one side only Concrete curb opposite w/ small utility pole area Two lane roadway w/ sidewalk and parking one side only // rolled curb opposite Concrete rolled curb opposite. Homeowner's choice for 5ft utility pole area Administrative process : timing, design, contract piggyback on Val -vue Political and Public Process Attributes of Pin 733000005 733000010 733000020 733000025 733000030 733000055 733000130 733000135 733000155 733000160 733000170 733000175 733000180 --733000190 733000200 *733000205 X33000210 733000220 `133000225 '`-4023049045 X023049051 7340600020 7340600021 7340600022 7340600023 7340600024 7340600040 7340600041 7340600042 7340600044 7340600045 7340600046 7340600060 7340600061 7340600062 7340600065 7340600066 7340600067 7340600068 7340600080 Themel.shp Area c�1,876 ,653 *1.1,475 x,085 29,360 42,910 0 26,432 "0 0 15,1873811 S 116TH ST 168 Address 0 0& 0 0• ' WI( 'UC�E� 9,947 19,894 11,003 'u'U ° o °) nM I6a 11,148 12,211 17,931 3826 S 116TH ST 168 10,132•�� 10,058 3818 S 116TH ST 168 21,192 11621 39TH AV S 168 Ag.V,A0 68 e•s°_°3_1( ¶1 `li °i 51 • s 10,321 38 40,510 3 33,533'1 584 is W'u - -168 5,145 T 68 27,39 191 BN L S 168 X16,565/9 0 16,53 ifrAl o • G°pv g (.8 40 6,966 11914 INTERURBAN AV S 168 16,239 0 0 11,248 42i'I'FF91T1,F3Ti1IO■ 7,369 11902 INTERURBAN AV S 168 '`2,818 0 0 , 12,957 4037 S 119TH ST 168 Ar6,967 10,40 17,35 " 7,89 11,05 7',962 443,747 118,814 .17,417 4tZ6 S T 22,5944Q111TTuJ H AV S 168 a.si �� 5151fii�l r • 0 - IJII\° 1 68 It__ 411° ` ffTi°; 4035 S 119TH ST 168 11816 40TH PL S'168 • 4020 S 119TH ST 168 4036 S 119TH ST 168 11816 40TH AV S 168 00 vu10n X51 8 �.� Taxpayer WIl nil lS� A A NELSON J & R FAMILY NELSON J & R FAMILY GUSTAFSON THEODO GUSTAFSON THEODO SICCARDI FRANK MARSH LEE E & VIRGII STEADMAN JEFFREY FLIEDER FRANCES E FLIEDER FRANCES E NORRIS JAMES B+NAI\ NORRIS JAMES A KERR GEORGNA L +RC DESJARDIN WILLIAM I- CARLSON ELMER J CARLSON E J SWANSON JAMES T PEASE VIRGINIA PEASE VIRGINIA PEASE VIRGINIA PEASE VIRGINIA LINDER PHILLIP I +PAM BOARDMAN THOMAS 1 BOARDMAN THOMAS F BERKMAN EDWARD E t I Vain ff#1 WICHMANN BRIAN STEPHENS JAMES E STEPHENS JAMES E SCHALHAMER ROBER NELSON NELLY M +MAI DAVIS KEVIN WALZ DAVID B HEMMERLING DONALC WALLACE MARVIN E +V HAWLEY HOWARD M HAWLEY HOWARD M HORE LOREN G GROSS LONNY ALLEN LARSON HERBERT A (o Address1 PO BOX 88755 15727 JIM CREEK RD 15727 JIM CREEK RD 16822 SE 136TH ST 16822 SE 136TH ST 4408 S 156TH 2079 SE 8TH DR 3811 S 116TH ST 3819 S 117TH 3819 S 117TH 18240 4TH AVE S 11621 39TH AVE SOU 1245 SW OTHELLO 3826 S 116TH ST 3818 S 116TH ST 3818 SO 116TH 424 BIRCH ST PO BOX 88755 PO BOX 88755 PO BOX 88755 PO BOX 88755 11918 INTERURBAN F 11926 INTERURBAN / 11926 INTERURBAN / 11914 INTERURBAN F PM #2304102302 15201 MILITARY RD F. 11902 INTERURBAN / 11902 INTERURBAN 4037 S 119TH ST 2508 MILL AVE S 4035 S 119TH PO BOX 69034 4020 S 119TH ST 4036 S 119TH ST 11816 40TH AVE S 11816 40TH AVE S 4823 PANTHER LK RC 4076 S 119TH ST 11734 40TH PL S 01 Address2 Address3 Bldgtype House Street Type Bedroom First Half Second Upper TUKWILA WA ARLINGTON WP ARLINGTON WP RENTON WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA RENTON WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA MILTON WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA 700 5TH AVE #2 SEATTLE SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA RENTON WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SNOHOMISH W, SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 1 11620 MARGINA WY 1' 340 0 0 0 2 11640 MARGINA WY `2 680 0 0 0 1 3811 116TH ST ` 2 650 0 0 0 1 3813 116TH ST %2 870 0 0 0 1 3819 116TH ST `2 850 0 0 0 1 11609 39TH AV `2 1050 0 0 0 1 11621 39TH AV 3 1050 0 0 0 1 3834 116TH ST 3, 940 380 0 0 1 3826 116TH ST 4 900 0 0 0 1 3822 116TH ST 1• 600 0 0 0 1 3818 116TH ST 4- 620 580 0 0 1 3816 116TH ST 0 380 0 0, 0 1 3806 116TH ST ` 2 870 0 0 0 1 3540 116TH ST 1 1280 0 0 0 2 11534 MARGINA WY 4 1120 0 0 0 2 3540 116TH ST 4 1170 0 780 0 1 11918 INTERURF PL 4 900 520 0 0 1 11928 INTERURF AV \-2 1120 0 0 0 1 11914 INTERURF AV 2 660 0 0 0 1 4021 119TH ST 3- 870 0 0 • 0 1 11902 INTERURE AV L2 760 0 0 0 1 4037 119TH ST 5 680 0 680 0 1 4025 119TH ST 3- 720 0 190 ' 0 1 4035 119TH ST ' 2 1150 0 0 0 1 11816 40TH PL 3 740 300 0 0 1 4020 119TH ST 3 1160 0 0 0 1 4036 119TH ST •- 2 790 310 0 0 1 11816 40TH AV 3 1310 0 0' 0 1, 11820 40TH AV 4 1080 800 1 . 4026 119TH ST • 2 1720 0 1 11734 40TH AV 3 810 320 LiveareE Basearea 340 41 680 0 Yearblt Yearrenv Condtion Landuse 901 901 901 0 1 101 0 1 ' 101 901 901 19421 0 2 101 1967* 0 3 101 1968 0 3 101 1921-- 0 3 101 19566 0 3 101 1929 - 0 ✓�4 101 1928-- 0 Q" 4\ 101 1918 0 1 101 1920 0 3 101 1946 ! 0 3 101 1918 0 2 101 1900 0 4 101 1920 0 1 - - 102 1937 0 2 102 1930 0 3 101 901 1934 0 3 101 1928 0 3 101 901 1946 0 3 101 19461 0 3 101 _ 901 1927` 0 5 101 1945 1 0 4 101 1963 at 0 3 101 1920 0 5 101 1947 # 0 2 101 1908 0 4 101 1961 1 0 3 101 901 1920 0 3 101 1967 #1 0 3 101 1918 0 4 101 340 1938' 0 1941 650 0 870 • 0 850 • 0 1,0501 550 -1,050 $ -• 0 1,3201 640 '111,300 1 900 600 ;? 520 1,200 * --. 620 380 ') 0 870 • 0 -.1,280 1 0 1,120 t 1120 1,760 0 2,060 900 1,120 f -1000 660 , 0 870 • 0 760 1 0 1,360 f . 680 910 4 0 1,1501- 0 1,040 • 930 1,160 +� � 0 1,100 # 790 X1,310 # 1310 1,880 1080 1,720 0 1,130 810 Lndvalue 19,000 20,000 36,000 33,000 33,000 58,000 35,000 1+ indicates redevelopment potential Imprvalu Billed Paid Senexmpt landvalue /impvalue 85 43 30,794 15,397 32,415 16,208 85 37,000 118,315 85 85 53,485 26,743 85 43 #DIV /0! 55,000 142,627 71,314 0.6 99,000 254,459 127,230 0.585859 85 42 #DIV /0! 168,559 168,559 0.507246 85 42 #DIV /0! - 85 43 #DIV /0! 85 42 #DIV /0! 48,000 43,000 147,489 73,745 c1=11627r - 85 42 #DIV /0! 85 42 #DIV /0! - 94 47 #DIV /0! - 85 43 #DIV /0! 28,000 45,000 118,315 59,158 0.622222 64,000 90,000 249,596 124,798 0.711111 30,000 - 48,623 48,623 #DIV /0! 85 85 #DIV /0! 85 85 #DIV /0! 200 - #DIV /0! 33,000 56,000 144,247 72,124 0.589286 31,000 41,000 116,694 116,694 0.756098 - 85 85 #DIV /0! 62,000 79,000 228,527 114,264 0.78481 85 42 #DIV /0! 85 42 #DIV /0! - - 85 42 #DIV /0! 85 43 #DIV /0! 46,000 35,000 115,237 57,619 - 85 43 #DIV /0! - - 85 43 #DIV /0! 31,000 73,000 168,559 84,280 0.424658 85 43 #DIV /0! - - 94 47 #DIV /0! 69,000 7340600250 7340600260 7340600280 7340600282 7340600283 417340600320 7340601080 7340601081 de 9,485 11705 40TH AV S 168 .43,123/3915 S 117TH ST 168 59,499 3901 S 117TH ST 1'68 09,951 3 69,459 3819 S 117TH ST 168 37,162 0 0 60,499 0 0 038,476 0 0 *OR = 1151711 n ?51os RONNING ALAN C 11705 40TH AVE S GUSTAFSON THEODO 3915 S 117TH HILDNER TAMERA L 3901 S 117TH ST HILDNER TAMERA L 3901 S 117TH FLIEDER FRANCES E 3819 S 117TH SICCARDI FRANK 4408 S 156TH CITY_OF- -SEATTLE=CIT1700 5TH AVE #2808 BOARDMAN THOMAS 1 11926 INTERURBAN SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 1 11705 40TH AV 1 3915 117TH ST 1 3901 117TH ST 1 3909 117TH ST 1 3819 117TH ST -2 920 0 0 `.2 660 0 0 3\. ,1230 220 0 3 620 0 430 1 670 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 i 920. 910 1908 0 660 0 1940 ' 0 " 1,450 ,P 0 1922 / 0 1,050 • ` 0 1918 0 670 0 1942 0 0 4 101 3 101 4 101 3 101 3 101 901 901 2,000 901 33,000 62,000 153,972 76,986 35,000 34,000 111,832 55,916 85 43 - 85 42 103 94 47 94 94 0.532258 `1- 029412 #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #DIV /0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! 7340600081 7340600082 7340600083 7340600084 --7340600100 7340600101 7340600102 7340600103 7340600104 7340600105 7340600106 7340600120 7340600121 7340600122 7340600123 7340600124 7340600125 7340600140 7340600141 7340600142 7340600143 - X340600160 -j-7340600165 7340600180 7340600181 7340600182 7340600183 7340600184 7340600200 -7340600201 7340600220 7340600221 7340600240 7340600241 7340600242 7340600243 7340600244 7340600245 7340600246 7340600247 7340600248 7340600249 20,010011728 40TH AV S 168 09,395 11801 40TH PL S 168 20,490 `.,11,002 11806 40TH AV S 168 '°11,968 0 0 „\ ` n 11,401 - 11,625 22,459 ` 11,199 11,465 058,240 08,900 • 7,270 22,751 23,562011620 40TH AV S 168 24,630011624 40TH AV S 168 6,559 1704 40TH AV S 168 27,514011608 40TH AV S 168 j j j_ 4007`S 117T it `� U CLS ' i j yu A l)- tun (o 1115Fiftitf L510: 4030 S 117TH PL 168 11702 40TH AV S 168 t %UTAO 'off l- as 24,9160 21,480011602 40TH AV S 168 18,676-?11606 40TH AV S 168 42,204 11532 40TH AV S 168 oJirthlG•QMg 11(t3 37,563 •9 �JIH 17,268''3924 S 117TH ST •168 O 8,689 11605 40TH AV S.168 ii§0250 0 0 0.9,072 0 0 07,574)1535 40TH AV S t68 17,251 36,484_3914 S 11 H ST 168 23,994 20,705011600 39TH AV S 168 0.6,163 11823 40TH AV S 168 "2 „472 11,498 ° e g TanrIA row 9C: 01 U 11733 40TH AV S 168 11,940 11807 40TH AV S' 168 ' 11,568 11801 40TH AV S 168 ;;9,278. " !, 7,955 151; =° rMnM,41o8 '1r11,291 ,1711 40TH AV S 168 18,347 11717 40TH AV `S 168 11,569 11729 40TH AV S 168 �Ia MCCARTON KATHLEEI' 11728 40TH S SENTS TIMOTHY E 11801 40TH PL S DERY PATRICIA C 1885 WHITCOMB CT I HANNAH ROSA LEE 11806 40TH AVE S MURPHY JANICE A 4017 S 117TH PL HALBERT JACK E +JULI4030 S 117TH PL FJELD JANICE M 4007 S 117TH PL ALLSOPP JAMES L JR 4031 S 117TH PL MURPHY LANCE 4004 S 117TH PL 4823 165TH DR SE HALBERT JACK E +JULI4030 S 117TH PL PENDLEY DEAN P +BOI 11702 40TH AVE S WICHMANN BRIAN +MP 15201 MILITARY RD E. N AMRICAN FINANCIAL SALA RICHARD MONTGOMERY HOWA 11620 40TH AVE S GWINN CINDY L 11624 40TH AVE S MONDALE TIMOTHY W 11704 40TH AVE S MORGAN C R 11608 40TH AVE SO TURNER JAY C +DIANA 24629 35TH PL S JUSTINE ANNE E D'AMBROSIO MICHAE CROOM BRENT D +TRII 11606 40TH AVE S HAGGARD WILLIAM W 11532 40TH AVE S HAGGARD WILLIAM W 11532 40TH AVE S WOODS JESSE +VICTO3924 S 117TH MOLTHEN RICHARD R.11605 40TH AVE SO ALLSUP JEREMIAH C +.11545 40TH AVE S PATTON MATTHEW A 11535 40TH AVE S PATTON MATTHEW A 11535 40TH AVE S NAKATA LINDSAY N M SHARON NAKATA SWAN JOHN K 3914 S 117TH KERR RONALD M +GEC 1245 SW OTHELLO InL01nd� 1Lr0Y � 1(Q? NAKATA KAZUO MILLER ELDRA DAHL JOHN H STEARN WILLIAM D 11600 39TH AVE S 11823 40TH AVE S 11717 40TH AVE S 11733 +11733 1/2 40T TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SALEM OR SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SNOHOMISH W, TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 32 HALSTEAD A YONKER.E. TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE KENT WA 11602 40TH AVE TUKWILA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA 11600 39TH AVE SEATTLE TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA SEATTLE WA 22601 18TH AVE DES MOIN I KENT WA SEATTLE WA SEATTLE WA TUKWILA WA O'BRIEN MATTHEW & 1 11807 40TH AVE S COREY BONNIE L 11801 40TH AVE S KEEFE THOMAS P KEEFE ANN HOPFNE DOUVIER JAMES A & N 29808 THOMAS RD S WHITLEY D KIRK 11711 40TH AVE S DAHL JOHN H 11717 40TH AVE S FRAIR CLIFFORD 11729 40TH AVE S 1 11728 40TH AV 1 11801 40TH PL 1 11802 40TH PL 1 11806 40TH AV 5 750 100 410 0 1 920 0 0 0 '2 1020 0 0 0 3 „ 970 0 0 0 1 11722 40TH AV 4 1000 800 0 0 1 4016 117TH 1 4030 117TH 1 11702 40TH 1, 11706 40TH 0I1 1 11710 40TH 1 11620 40TH 1 11624 40TH 1 11704 40TH 1 11608 40TH 1, 11612 40TH 11602 40TH 1 11606 40TH 1. 11532 40TH 1 11540 40TH 1 3924 117TH 1 11605 40TH 1 1 1 1 1 PL `2 1040 0 0 0' PL 30 1610 0 0 0 AV 3, 1910 0 0 0 AV `2 840 0 0 0 AV '2 820 0 0 0 AV '2 1860 740 0 0 AV 5 950 430 0 0 AV `2 850 0 0 0 AV 3: 940 370 0 0 AV 12 900 0 0 0 AV 4 1100 0 0 0 AV ` 2 940 0 0 0 AV 4 900 0 900 0 AV '2 1290 0 0 0 ST 3. 1240 0 1210 0 AV 4 720 0 340 , 0 11535 40TH AV 3, 910 0 0 0 3916 117TH ST 3 , 1080 0 0 0 3914 117TH ST 3, 960 290 0 0 3836 116TH ST 3 980 200 0 0 11600 39TH AV 4 1420 0 0 0 11823 40TH AV 2 620 0 0 0 1 11733 40TH 1 11807 40TH 1 11801 40TH AV ' 2 560 0 0 0 AV 4 1010 0 400 0 AV ' 2 750 0 0 0 1 11809 40TH AV 3 ,, 950 170 0 0 1 11711 40TH AV 1/4. 2 880 0 0 0 1 11717 40TH AV ' 2 860 0 0 0 1 11729 40TH AV \-2 950 0 0 0 1 ;260 p 0 1902. 0 5 101 - 85 ■ 920 0 1926 0 4 101 31,000 66,000 157,213 11,020* -. 1020 1921°' 0 3 101 - - 85 970 , 0 1971 ♦ 0 3 101 33,000 62,000 153,972 Q 901 41,000 34,000 22,651 901 12,000 - 19,449 901 85 1,600 940 1908: 0 4 101 62,000 68,000 210,698 901 35,000 73,000 175,042 . 1,040 0 0 1946;` 0 3 101 - 85 1,610 1620 1908 0 4 101 85 1,910 120 19501 0 4 101 33,000 98,000 212,319 840. 840 1956E 0 2 101 - 85 8204 400 1945 g 0 3 101 - 94 1,860 0 1943 f 1950 4 101 - 94 2,28.0_ 950 1918 1997 3 101 62,000 89,000 244,734 X850 • 800 1956 0 5 101 85 950 • 940 1920 ' 0 4 101 - 94 900 • 0 1953 1 0 3 101 36,000 77,000 183,145 1,790 990 1943 0 0 4 101 62,000 82,000 233,389 940 • 0 1930-- 0 4 101 - 85 1,800 0 1903 0 4 101 70,000 63,000 215,561 -1,290 0 1290 1941 1 0 3 101 - - 94 45 0 1993 0 3 101 - 85 1,060 ti 340 1947 0 3 101 33,000 65,000 158,834 901 85 901 - 85 '1,610 910 1955 1 0 3 101 43,000 52,000 153,972 1,080 i 0 1940 0 3 101 - - 85 '1,250 # 230 1922--- 0' 2 101 68,000 32,000 162,076 1;180 980 1921 0 4 101 62,000 61,000 199,353 1,420 0 820 1930' 0 4 101 39,000 85,000 200,974 620 ? 420 1947 0 0 3 101 - 85 901 600 - 972 560 ' 0 1936-- 0 5 101 33,000 90,000 199,353 -'1,410 • 390 1920- 1984 3 101 85 750 , 0 1922' 0 3_ 101 85 901 31,000 29,000 97,245 1,120 • t 0 1943 11 0 4 101 85 880 ` 0 1937,- 0 5 101 - 85 860 • 620 1918 0 3 101 36,000 46,000 132,902 950 r, 780 1945 ' 0 3 101 85 43 78,607 43 76,986 11,326 F 85 105,349 87,521 42 42 106,160 42 47 47 122,367 47 91,573 116,695 42 107,781 47 42 79,417 42 43 76,986 43 99,677 100,487 42 972 99,677 43 42 48,623 42 43 132,902 43 #DIV /0! 0.469697 #DIV /0! 0.532258 t1=2 20.5882' #D IV/0! #DIV /0! 0.911765 0.479452 #D IV/0! #DIV /0! 0.336735 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! #DIV /0! 0.696629 #D IV/0! #DIV /0! 0.467532 0.756098 #DIV /0! 1:11 111 11' #DIV /0! #D IV/0! 0.507692 #D IV/0! #DIV /0! 0.826923 #D IV/0! 2.125 X1:01:6393 '0.458824 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! 0.366667 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! 1 -068966 #DIV /0! #DIV /0! 0.782609 #DIV /0! VAL VUE SEWER DIST. TUKWILA PW DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS MC 12/11/2000 PARCEL TAX LOT NO. 1A 1B 1C LAST NAME 102304 9045 PONSAR SITE ADDRESS 11534 E MARGINAL WAY S 2 102304 9051 PEASE 3521 S 116TH 3 073300 0005 4 0773300 -0010 5 073300 -0020 6 073300 -0025 7A 073300 -0030 7B 7C 7D 8 & 9 A 073300 -0055 SICCARDI 8& 9 B 8& 9 C 8& 9 D 8& 9 E 10A 073300 -0225 PEASE 10B 10C 10D PEASE NO SITE ADDRESS NELSON NO SITE ADDRESS NELSON NO SITE ADDRESS CEDAR GROVE 11620E MARGINAL WAY S CEDAR GROVE 11640 E MARGINAL WAY S 11 073300 -0220 12A 073300 -0210 12B 12C 13 &14 A 07330 -0205 13 &14 B 07330 -0200 13 &14 C 15A 07330 -0190 15B 16 & 17 A 07330 -0180 KERR 16 & 17 B 734060 -0220 16 & 17 C 16 & 17 D 16 & 17 E 18A 734060 -0201 SWAN 18B 18C 18D ROOT SWANSON CARLSON 23A 23B 24A 24B 25A 25B 25C 19 734060 -0184 20 734060 -0183 21 734060 -182 22 734060 -181 734060 -0180 PATTON PATTON ALLSUP MOLTHEN WOODS 734060 -0200 NAKATA 734060 -0221 NAKATA 26 073300 -0170 27A 073300 -0160 HALL 27B 27MISS 073300 -0156 28 073300 -0155 29A 073300 -0135 29B 30A 07330 -0130 MARSH 30B 30C 30D NOT AVAILABLE GAVRILENKO STEADMAN 31 073300 -0175 32A 734060 -0283 32B 32C 32D 32E NORRIS MCCOY 33 734060 -0280 ULIBARRI 34 734060 -0282 PESOTSKIY 35 734060 -0260 GUSTAFSON 36 734060 -0250 RONNING 37 734060 -0247 WHITLEY 38 & 39 A 734060 -0248 DAHL 38 & 39 B 734060 -0241 40 734060 -0249 FRAIR 41 734060 -0242 STEAM 42 734060 -0244 COREY 43 734060 -0243 OBREIN 44 734060 -0246 DOUVIER 45 734060 -0245 TRAVERS 46 734060 -0240 'MILLER 47A 734060 -0160 HAGGARD 47B 47C 47D 48A 734060 -0165 HAGGARD 48B 48C 48D 49A 734060 -0142 'DAMBROSIO 49B 49C 50A 734060 -0143 OHARE 50B 51A 734060 -0141 TURNER 51B 51C 52A 734060 -140 MORGAN 52B 52C 53A 734060 -0123 NGUYEN 53B 53C 54A 734060 -0124 GWINN 54B 54C 55 734060 -0120 56 734060 -0125 PENDLEY MONDALE NO SITE ADDRESS 3540 S 116TH ST 3806 S 116.TH ST 3816 S 116TH ST 3818 S 116TH ST 3822 S 116TH ST 3826 S 116TH ST 3834 S 116TH ST 3864 S 116TH ST 3914 S 117TH ST 11535 40TH AVE S 11535 40TH AVE S 11545 40TH AVE S 11605 40TH AVE S 3924 S 117TH ST 3916 S 117TH ST 11600 39TH AVE S 11609 39TH AVE S 3817 S 116TH ST 3819 S 116TH ST 3813 S 116TH ST 3811 S 116TH NO SITE ADDRESS 11621 39TH AVE S 3819 S 117TH ST 3901 S 117TH ST 3909 S 117TH ST 3915 S 117TH ST 11705 40TH AVE S 11711 40TH AVE S 11717 40TH AVE S 11729 40TH AVE S 11733 40TH AVE S 11801 40TH AVE S 11807 40TH AVE S 11809 40TH AVE S 11815 40TH AVE S 11823 40TH AVE S 11532 40TH AVE S 115540 40TH AVE S 116602 40TH AVE S 11606 40TH AVE S 11608 40TH AVE S 11620 40TH AVE S 11624 40TH AVE S 11702 40TH AVE S 11704 40TH AVE S FRONTAGE (FT) AREA(SF) FRONTAGE .. CHARGE 45 7,411.00 $1,350.00 45 7,411.00 $1,350.00 45 7,411.00 $1,350.00 58.33 5,439.00 $1,749.90 56 7,700.00 $1,680.00 67.76 8,800.00 $2,032.80 103.67 10,500.00 $3,110.10 48.09 4,400.00 $1,442.70 52.21 6,850.00 $1,566.30 52.21 6,850.00 $1,566.30 52.21 6,850.00 $1,566.30 52.21 6,850.00 $1,566.30 60 7,940.00 $1,800.00 60 7,940.00 $1,800.00 60 7,940.00 $1,800.00 60 7,940.00 $1,800.00 60 7,940.00 $1,800.00 27.35 10,000.00 $820.50 27.35 10,000.00 $820.50 27.35 10,000.00 $820.50 27.35 10,000.00 $820.50 40 11,500.00 $1,200.00 26.67 7,100.00 $800.10 26.67 7,100.00 $800.10: 26.67 7,100.00t�� $800.10 26.67 6,933.33 $800.10 26.67 6,93133 $800.10 26.67 6,933:33 $800.10 36.26 8,300.00 $1,087.80 36.26 8,300.00 $1,087.80 34 7,380.00 $1,020.00 34 7,380.00 $1,020.00 34 7,380.00 $1,020.00 34 7,380.00 $1,020.00 34 7,380.00 $1,020.00 28.5 9,450.00 $855.00 28.5 9,450.00 $855.00 28.5 9,450.00 $855.00 28.5 9,450.00 $855.00 80.3 7,300.00 4\0 $2,409.00 81 8,910.00 $2,430.00 75 8,250.00 $2,250.00 80 8,800.00 $2,400.00 55 8,525.00 $1,650.00 55 8,525.00 $1,650.00 57 8,550.00 $1,710.00 57 8,550.00 $1,710.00 25 6,833.33 $750.00 25 6,833.33 $750.00 25 6,833.33 $750.00 88.03 11,012.00 $2,640.90 60 8,935.50 $1,800.00 60 8,935.50 $1,800.00 60 6,000.00 $1,800.00 60 6,000.00 $1,800.00 30 7,472.50 $900.00 30' 7,472.50 $900.00 40.95 6,531.25 $1,228.50 40.95 6,531.25 $1,228.50 40.95 6,531.25'"1 $1,228.50 40.95 6,531.25 $1,228.50 90.36 11,165.00 $2,710.80 24 13,939.20 $720.00 24 13,939.20 $720.00 24 13,939.20 $720.00 24 13,939.20 $720.00 24 13,939.20 $720.00 57.5 9,741.00 $1,725.00 57.5 9,741.00 $1,725.00 89 12,905.00 $2,670.00 67.5 9,113.00' $2,025.00 77.5 10,463.00 $2,325.00 45 9,765.00 $1,350.00 45 9,765.00 $1,350.00 56 11,200.00 $1,680.00 50 11,200.00 $1,500.00 48 10,752.00 $1,440.00 52 11,900.00 $1,560.00 40 7,900.00 0 $1,200.00 66 9,000.00 (So $1,980.00 80 6,000.00 $2,400.00 47.5 10,545.75 $1,425.00 47.5 10,545.75 $1,425.00 47.5 10,545.75 $1,425.00 47.5 10,545.75 $1,425.00 46.25 9,056.25 $1,387.50 46.25 9,056.25 $1,387.50 46.25 9,056.25 $1,387.50 46.25 9,056.25 $1,387.50 27.33 7;400.00 $819.90 27.33 7,400.00 $819.90 27.33 7,400.00 $819.90 41 9,430.00 $1,230.00 41 9,430.00 $1,230.00 36 8,388.00 $1,080.00 36 8,388.00 $1,080.00 36 8,388.00 $1,080.00 36 9,166.67 $1,080.00 36 9,166.67 .0 $1,080.00 36 9,166.67 \ $1,080.00 31.67 7,821.33 $950.10 31.67 7,821.33 $950.10 31.67 7,821.33 $950.10 31.67 8,100.00 $950.10 31.67 8,100.00 $950.10 31.67 8,100.00 $950.10 95 9,500.00 $2,850.00 70 6,650.00 30 $2,100.00 CHARGES FRONTAGE FT AREA UNIT . STUB AREA CHARGE $1,556 31 $1,556.31 $1,556.31 $1,142.19 $1,617.00 $1,848.00 $2,205.00 $924.00 $1,438.50 $1,438.50 $1,438.50 $1,438.50 $1,667.40 $1,667.40 $1,667.40 $1,667.40 $1,667.40 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,415.00 $1,491.00 $1,491.00 $1,491.00 $1,456.00 $1,456.00 $1,456.00 $1,743.00 $1,743.00 $1,549.80 $1,549.80 $1,549.80 $1,549.80 $1,549.80 $1,984.50 $1,984.50 $1,984.50 $1,984.50 $1,533.00 $1,871.10 $1,732.50 $1,848.00 $1,790.25 $1,790.25 $1,795.50 $1,795.50 $1,435.00 $1,435.00 $1,435.00 $2, 312.52 $1,876.46 $1,876.46 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 $1,569.23 $1,569.23 $1,371.56 $1,371.56 $1,371.56 $1,371.56 $2,344.65 $2,927.23 $2,927.23 $2,927.23 $2,927.23 $2,927.23 $2,045.61 $2,045.61 $2,710.05 $1,913.73 $2,197.23 $2,050.65 $2,050.65 $2,352.00 $2,352.00 $2,257.92 $2,499.00 $1,659.00 $1,890.00 $1,260.00 $2,214.61 $2,214.61 $2,214.61 $2,214.61 $1,901.81 $1,901.81 $1,901.81 $1,901.81 $1,554.00 $1,554.00 $1,554.00 $1,980.30 $1,980.30 $1,761.48 $1,761.48 $1,761.48 $1,925.00 $1,925.00 $1,925.00 $1,642.48 $1,642.48 $1,642.48 $1,701.00 $1,701.00 $1,701.00 $1,995.00 $1,396.50 $30.00 $0.21 $3,300.00 $800.00 UNIT STUB TOTAL CHARGE CHARGE $3,300 00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300 00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00, $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $3,300.00 $800 -00 $7,006.31 $800.00 $7,006.31 $800.00 ' $7,006.31 $800.00 $6,992.09 $800.00 $7,397.00 $800.00 $7,980.80 $800.00 $9,415.10 $800.00 $6,466.70 $800.00 $7,104.80 $800.00 $7,104.80 $800.00 $7,104.80 $800.00 $7,104.80 $800.00 $7,567.40 $800.00 $7,567.40 $800.00 $7,567.40 $800.00 $7,567.40 $800.00 $7,567.40 $800.00 $7,020.50 $800.00 $7,020.50 $800.00 $7,020.50 $800.00 $7,020.50 $800.00 $7,715.00 $800.00 $6,391.10 $800.00 $6,391.10 $800.00 $6,391.10 $800.00 $6,356.10 $800.00 $6,356.10 $800.00 $6,356.10 $800.00 $6,930.80 $800.00 $6,930.80 $800.00 $6,669.80 $800.00 $6,669.80 $800.00 $6,669.80 $800.00 $6,669.80 $800.00 $6,669.80 $800.00 $6,939.50 $800.00 $6,939.50 $800.00 $6,939.50 $800.00 $6,939.50 $800.00 $8,042.00 $800.00 $8,401.10 $800.00 $8,082.50 $800.00 $8,348.00 $800.00 $7,540.25 $800.00 $7,540.25 $800.00 $7,605.50 $800.00 $7,605.50 $800.00 $6,285.00 $800.00 $6,285.00 $800.00 $6,285.00 $800.00 $9,053.42 $800.00 $7,776.46 $800.00 $7,776.46 $800.00 $7,160.00 $800.00 $7,160.00 $800.00 $6,569.23 $800.00 $6,569.23 $800.00 $6,700.06 $800.00 $6,700.06 $800.00 $6,700.06 $800.00 $6,700.06 $800.00 $9,155.45 $800.00 $7,747.23 $800.00 $7,747.23 $800.00 $7,747.23 $800.00 $7,747.23 $800.00 $7,747.23 $800.00 $7,870.61 $800.00 $7,870.61 $800.00 $9,480.05 $800.00 $8,038.73 $800.00 $8,622.23 $800.00 $7,500.65 $800.00 $7,500.65 $800.00 $8,132.00 $800.00 $7,952.00 $800.00 $7,797.92 $800.00 $8,159.00 $800.00 $6,959.00 $800.00 $7,970.00 $800.00 $7,760.00 $800.00 $7,739.61 $800.00 $7,739.61 $800.00 $7,739.61 $800.00 $7,739.61 $800.00 $7,389.31 $800.00 $7,389.31 $800.00 $7,389.31 $800.00 $7,389.31 $800.00 $6,473.90 $800.00 $6,473.90 $800.00 $6,473.90 $800.00 $7,310.30 $800.00 $7,310.30 $800.00 $6,941.48 $800.00 $6,941.48 $800.00 $6,941.48 $800.00 $7,105.00 $800.00 $7,105.00 $800.00 $7,105.00 $800.00 $6,692.58 $800.00 $6,692.58 $800.00 $6,692.58 $800.00 $6,751.10 $800.00 $6,751.10 $800.00 $6,751.10 $800.00 $8,945.00 $800.00 $7,596.50 57 734060 -0121 WICHMANN 11706 40TH AVE S 71.5 6,974.00 $2,145.00 $1,464.54 $3,300 00 $800 -00 $7,709.54 58A 734060 -0122 PEYCKE 11710 40TH AVE S 31.67 7,533.33 $950.10 $1,582.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,632.10 58B 31.67 7,533.33 $950.10 $1,582 00 $3,300 00 $800 00 $6,632 -10 56C 31.67 7,533.33 $950.10 $1,58200 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,632.10 59 734060 -0104 MURPHY 4404 S 117TH PL 90 11,520.00 $2,700.00 $2,419.20 $3,300.00 $800.00 $9,219.20 60 734060 -0105 HORE 4416 S 117TH PL 90 11,520.00 $2,700.00 $2,419.20 $3,300.00 $800.00 $9,219.20 61 & 62A 734060 -0101 HALBERT 4430 S 117TH PL 36 6,764.00 $1,080.00 $1,420.44 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,600.44 61 & 62B 36 6,764.00 $1,080.00 $1,420.44 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,600.44 61 & 62C 36 6,764.00 $1,080.00 $1,420.44 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,600.44 61 & 62D 36 6,764.00 $1,080.00 $1,420.44 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,600.44 61 & 62E 36 6,764.00 /� $1,080.00 $1,420.44 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,600.44 63 734060 -0102 FJELD 4007 S 117TH PL 100 12,000.00 � $3,000.00 $2,520.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $9,620.00 64 734060 -0100 MURPHY 4017 S 117TH PL 100 12,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,520.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $9,620.00 65A 734060 -0103 ALLSOP 11722 40TH AVE S 33.33 7,433.33 $999.90 $1,561.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,660.90 65B 33.33 7,433.33 $999.90 $1,561.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,660.90 65C 33.33 7,433.33 $999.90 $1,561.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,660.90 66A 7344060 -0081 MCCARTON 11728 40TH AVE S 31.67 6,666.67 $950.10 $1,400.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,450.10 66B 31.67 6,666.67 $950.10 $1,400.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,450.10 668 31.67 6,666.67 $950.10 $1,400.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,450.10 67A 734060 -0080 LARSON 11734 40TH PL S 31.67 7,466.67 $950.10 $1,568.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,618.10 678 31.67 7,466.67 $950.10 $1,568.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,618.10 67C 31.67 7,466.67 $950.10 $1,568.00 $3,300 00 $800.00 $6,618.10 68 734060 -0084 HANNAH 118806 40TH AVE S 85 10,830.00 $2,550.00 $2,274.30 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,924,30 69 734060 -0082 SENTS 11801 40TH PL S 85 9,200.00 $2,550.00 $1,932.00 $3,300 00 $800 00 $8,582.00 70A 734060 -0083 DERY 11808 40TH PL S 28.33 7,066.67 $849.90 $1,484.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,433.90 70B 28.33 7,066.67 $849 90 $1,484 00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,433.90 70C 28.33 7,066.67 $849.90 $1,484.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,433.90 71A 734060 -0060 WALZ 11816 40TH PL S 40 8,600.00 $1,200.00 $1,806.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,106.00 71B 40 8,600.00 $1,200.00 $1,806.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,106.00 72 734060 -0066 HAWLEY NO SITE ADDRESS 80 8,000.00 $2,400.00 $1,680.00 $3,300 00 $800.00 $8,180.00 73 734060 -0065 HAWLEY 11816 40TH AVE S 80 8,320.00 $2,400.00 $1,747.20 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,247.20 74 734060 -0067 HORE 11820 40TH AVE S 80 8,800.00 \ $2,400.00 $1,848.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,348.00 75 734060 -0061 HEMMERLING 4020 S 119TH ST 80 7,720.00 $2,400.00 $1,621.20 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,121.20 76 734060 -0068 WILHELM 4026 S 119TH ST 80 7,200.00 $2,400.00 $1,512.00 $3,300.00 $600.00 $8,012.00 77 734060 -0062 WALLACE 4036 S 119TH ST 80 10,900.00 $2,400.00 $2,289.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,789.00 78 & 79 734060 -0041 STEPHENS 11902 INTERURBAN AVE S 60 9,786.00 $1,800.00 $2,055.06 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,955.06 80 734060 -0040 WICHMANN 4021 S 119TH ST 80 10,080.00 $2,400.00 $2,116.80 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,616.80 81 734060 -0045 HUNT 4025 S 119TH ST 50 6,300.00 $1,500.00 $1,323.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,923.00 82 734060 -0046 DAVIS 4035 S 119TH ST 75 9,450.00 $2,250.00 $1,984.50 $3,300.00 $800.00 $8,334.50 83 734060 -0044 SCHALHAMER 4037 S 119TH ST 88 13,180.00 $2,640.00 $2,767.80 $3,300.00 $800.00 $9,507.80 84 734060 -0023 BERKMAN 11914 INTERURBAN PL S 60 7,095.00 $1,800.00 $1,489.95 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,389.95 85A 734060 -0020 LINDER 11918 INTERURBAN PL S 20 6,870.00 $600.00 $1,442.70 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,142.70 856 20 6,870.00 $600.00 $1,442.70 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,142.70 85C 20 6,870.00 $600 00 $1,442 70 $3,300 00 $800 -00 $6,142.70 85C 20 6,870.00 $600.00 $1,442.70 $3,300.00 $800.00 $6,142.70 86A 734060 -0022 BOARDMAN 11918 INTERURBAN PL S 50 8,300.00 $1,500.00 $1,743.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,343.00 86B 50 8,300.00 $1,500.00 $1,743.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,343.00 87A 734060 -0021 BOARDMAN 42 9,235.00 $1,260.00 $1,939.35 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,299.35 87B 42 9,235.00 $1,260.00 $1,939.35 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,299.35 88 734060 -0024 CITY LIGHT 18,970.00 to $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 89A 734060 -1081 BOARDMAN 24.5 10,500.00 $735.00 $2,205.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,040.00 896 24.5 10,500.00 $735.00 $2,205.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,040.00 89C 24.5 10,500.00 $735.00 $2,205.00 $3,300.00 $800 -00 $7,040.00 89D 24.5 10,500.00 $735.00 $2,205.00 $3,300.00 $800.00 $7,040.00 TOTALS 7568.64 1,401,201.99 $227,059.20 $290,268.72 $531,300.00 $128,800.00 $1,177,427.92 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SHEET INDEX Cover Sheet COVER Legend and General Notes . GN -1 Road and Storm Drainage Plan and Profile .: RS -1 through RS -8 Road and Storm Drainage Details RS -9, RS-10, RS -11 . . Erosion Control Details RS -12 Water Plan and Profile WA-1 through WA -10 Water Details ° WA -11, WA12 Highline water district intertie Water district 75 intertie Water district #75 intertie Pressure Sustaining Valve:- Intertie Details WA -13. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile: S -1 through S -15 Duwamish Lift Station Plan 8 -1e Seagate Lift Station Modifications S -17. Sanitary Sewer Details S -18. Electrical Plan and Details E -1 through E -7 Elflllllla_911:,. IIIIIII111111III: ulll RIRI° III11!: ati.- - ' -- 1_4ggn;ZI;4111IC !M1111U Pte! VICINITY MAP Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 'Sixth Street South PH: (425)'827 -2014 Kirkland ,.' • Seattle Kirkland, WA 98033 www.paceengra.com 1 -800 -945 -8408 FAX: (425) 827 -5043 • Federal Way . • Cle Elam. • Portland COVER 00111.00 1:' 1 1 .6.3 1.1 /1; • / 36' CaP -6.86 1 11„11u 11111111 1111111 1 1111 I j11 I I 111 111111111 I I's-- 111 1111111111 1 I ///) 1/ / /1 /1 I 1 /,/ //////1/// 1 bN. w < 0 ha DO W �f ►� +s in ' �I _ ` = Bo � —��1. —.. � :s_ �T .......„.._......„,--,,--- ___,_____. -tom/ ��.313 -.1. — m 1sOO T.L FERMI ®M® �.o_ 1 "' 132 HOUSE 3816 FT 20.9 NO EMIT: Vi-° / HIC SCALE 10 20 COS . r DI FORCE ' AIN OVAL DRILL B' c FOR EIFCS8CAE ( IR PEST ) IuOb a 20 feet " 40 24 22 20 18 16 FF a, 20.5 NO BSA{T ; • 3550 • : FF.: 19.9 ' NO BSAMT" -- - • • 00 1 14 12 .. 'PROPOSED ST ................ OR ORA1.ORgini 4' MN • 10 8 (Ea.9.30 (8': OUT) z 9 0 0 a 4 9+00 10 +00 COOED CD DRAW CD/RI MCKID RDS %NSW DATE BY Engmeennq Plommng •• Suuveyi^9 14.44%) Penhallegon Associates Consulting g En 8fneers, Inc. /10 SbN 827. 1* aroma, .. 3361] .25) 82 -50* (425) 627 -200 - 600- Y.3 -N6! • 0 (425) 6n -5043 XOrtped • Federal W07 • • Pa Om 11 +00 12 +00 ' ::. ..Call ...before: You 6 D ;9.: 1 800424 5555 • • • twWWww 0911804 0.1943 4 13 +00 14 +00 15 +00 VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT REFEREM0; 9110O1AD01 FED BOX SURV. O'U F\F: DIt1SRV000 DAllk DALE FEBRUARY, 2002 SCALE 1' =20' H /1' =2' V DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS S. 116TH STREET, STA 10 +00 TO STA 15 +00 SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE m/55/o3 ,LOB WIER 00111:00 • D10 NO PO1)1S51.d q 6095 S1 or . 52 HOUSE 111621 • • FIN. FIR. -15.6 NO BASEMENT A. A i 1 (' 1® �. �1- �' � 4+5290 225 LL oRmassNiim ii.,,..ijimii,,s2w=.114...ii!Para "1,PIr°' -ememirra=azeilli*■• • - LiMireAVO-P,_rat.7 —mita_ Injammaniniassuimmegetaggimoimp;.44401i5 'NW .., - 8' PVC Aka -quilltill'401. Mr LMOVE EDSING FENCE TO t1O1111r1 i 11 6+76.14. =1 SIDE OF EASEMENT DURING 1 . -� SS ESW ..I '.-_I -. 111 • STRUCTION AFTER PAWN - ie1 ��L .�• i 1 15•ac CT NEW FENCE IN gNAL Inetdl 12. GATES ON ' . D WEST TMSIDES s \THE ACCESS 5 . �1� 6 INCIDENTAL • E PU : AT PIPE a. . 14 ........ .r 21 198LF - 67-PVC. SDR 35 S 0.6050 • ., ....... is 2 +00 s 0.0050 IE 1 L1.40. r (N) 261F- 86P11C 9 0.0050 I BAH 0:5 • RIM . 1201 E 0.80 B'..IN.. 1E'. -0.88 r.'. OUT 3+00 MH 424-•• • IE +'- 0.98.8'. IN........ . - >• . •IE•- 1.02.8'IOUF I .MH 119 RIM 128• - - : -2 -1E 4.31 6'•IN N .. . . ...rE. "5. *..N . :Gall. ' ) E .. 0.19 8' O U T before . i • 4 +00 • 6 +00 { i 6 +00 1:'800-42* -5555 . I UNDERWOUM slams 0511) looms 00/[..15 1 Engineering Planning - Surveying �- Peneering on Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. jr• lw sou. SWIM south . i5n,.161. WA 0503 . Po.. y ..wn PM (523) 527 -2015 - 500-925 -0405 PAC (525) 521 -5053 Kirkland • • F.d.i Way •' a. Ewe • REFEBF NCF 6ffODIAMN 1 DAZE FEBRUARY, 2002 DUWAMISH UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EASEMENT 1 SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE re MASER 00111.00 DWG N0 PO(1ISS14.Ng 96rr 8 -14 NrF 52 22 B• GRAVITY GRATING 1$ x*is BAR 14• S.S. BOLTS LADDER HANGER FOR 18' . EXTENSION LADDER. SEE DETAIL RIGHT - GRATING SUPPORT 2•x2• x1 /4- ANGLE. CUT OUT 2. OF HOR. LEG AT 8• C. TO C. INTERVALS & BEND TO FIT. MANHOLE ATTACH WITH SUP -R -RESIN ADHESIVE ANCHOR SYSTEM .ACME TOOL & SPECIALTY. 464 -1480. -838 -4372 8• PVC INTAKE AIR PIPE TO BLOWER 4•x4•x1,4 .ALUM. ANGLE 6•x21/2• STANDARD CHANNEL .ALL STRUCTURAL • ALUMINUM '<_ .606176 - ALUMINUM GRATING '.606376 BOLTS STAINLESS. STEEL TYPE 304 - ANCHORS .STAINLESS STEEL DETAIL n SCALE . 1 W =1' -0' 8•x4xVs• ANGLE' W/ $4. S.S. BOLTS. 14•.... - 1• ALUM 606176 ' 2• BAR BOLT PLATE .10 AH WALL W/W ANCHOR BOLTS TS B• PVC - EXHAUST VENT 8-x21/2-x14" CHANNEL PIPE RAIL SUPPORT 1." • CORE 2.5• HOLE THROUGH TOP SLAB, CENTER _4'3/4" FROM ACCESS FRAME L. g•8' DIA. MANHOLE B• PVC EXHAUST VENT B• GRAVITY ..8•. GRAVITY 141•. ALUM 606176 PLATE - LADDER HANGER N.T.S. 8• GRAVITY 4• .FORCE MAIN TOP ELEV a 12.00 PLAN SCALE: 1/2• =1' -0•': 3'x5'x6• CONCRETE PAD \ \ \ 8• PVC INTAKE AIR TOP EW \ . PIPE TO BLOWER . `� DOOR LOCATION \ ` . SCALE: 1/2•=1' -0? . SEE SITE ..PLAN FOR LOCATION EXHAUST- PIPING DETAIL": =MN MEM i�iIi9t2Le • -8• PVC INTAKE AIR : PIPE TO BLOWER S.S. STRAP, ANCHOR TO WALL (TYP.) :. TUBING RAILING' ALUMINUM - "INSTALL UNK AL VALVE .AND'' CLEAN OUT DETAIL TOP OF GRATING EL 3.50 SCALE 1/2• -1' -0- 4• HIGH ALUMINUM TOE BOARD 1h• S.S. BOLTS - - (TYPICAL) . IV t.11U1] Hi iiii•• SCALE .1/2• =1' -0•. CONSTRUCT NEW 2 X 2' CONCRETE PAD ON. TOP :OF MANHOLE SLAB. • 'PROVIDE 4• ROUND' HOLE AS SHOWN. GRAPHIC SCALE -o io: 20 1 rub _ .20 feet . SDMH IE 36" IE 36" EXISTING ' 6•• FM' FROM • DUWAMISH. PUMP STATION' - SEAGATE LIFT ' STATION ' SITE PLAN ,• -10' INSTALL - NEW 6• DI ELBOW AND 6• DI DROP NOTE: 'SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /2•=1' -0•. SEAGATE PUMP STATION. MODIFICATION. CaIl . ore you 24-5555 LOIDERGROUPO APP'D Engmeesing - Planning : ' -' Surveying: y,w' k- Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 s.,, . Pit (425) e27-2o” i- eao- fga•oe � � rw (425) 927a043 VUE SEWER - DISTRICT REFERENCE NFDWIAIBN 1 DAIS FEBRUARY; 2002 FI10 BOCK SUM! CPU FILE: 0111SRV.DOG DAUt scut 1• =20' H /1• •2' V DUWAMISH: AREA IMPROVEMENTS SEAGATE PUMP STATION . MODIFICATIONS roe 00111 :00 • DWG Na Poi11SS17.deg SHEET S -17 0P 52 EXISTING tITIUTY POLE WITH 120/240V, 3 -PHASE POWER ,• . SERVICE TRANSFORMER • EXISTING OVERHEAD 120/240V, 3 -PHASE SECONDARY POWER SERVICE CONDUCTORS : SEAGATE SEWER UFT STATION SEE ENLARGED PLAN ON THIS DRAWING FOR ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS IN THIS AREA ENTRANCE TO OFFICE COMPLEX EXISTING UTILITY POLE WITH' STREETLIGHT, Omm 0 EXISTING OVERHEAD 120/240V, 3 -PHASE SECONDARY POWER SERVICE CONDUCTORS • EXISTING UTILITY POLE • - - WITH STATION SERVICE .RISER •CONDUIT• T0• BE REUSED • • 41) CONDUITS TO - DUWAMISH AREA LIFT.. STATION. SEE CIVIL PLAN DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER ROUTING O \1/411-40. SEAGATE LIFT STATION GENERAL SITE PLAN :201510 •0 . 20 40 SCALE IN. FEET CONDUITS TO SEAGATE LIFT STATION • REFER TO CIVIL PLAN DRAWING • FOR LOCATION OF HANDHOLES • SCALE: 1 =20' • • S 11gT� SSRE�T SIGNAL .WIRING HANDHOLE • a:74 • ■ EXISTING BUSHES - (TYPICAL) • CIL ®r SERVICE: EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 0 ::POLEUGHT I E EXISTING ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. 8 - EXIST. " HANDHOLE EXISTING BUSHES j \ j / EXIST. LIGHT TO . \\ BE REPLACED \ \ \.\ RELOCATED , 1'/. �'\ 1 1 EXISTING GENERATOR - 1. I , I . RECEPTACLE .I i II 1 \\ i \�\ \ N ' EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER • SERVICE TO UTILITY POLE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL • "ROUTING BEFORE DIGGING - CONDUITS TO. DUWAMISH •AREA UFT STATION - POWER WIRING HANDHOLE PLAN - LIFT, STATION FEEDER PULLING HANDHOLE SCALE: 3/4a= 1'-Oa.: GENERATOR ENCLOSURE CONDUITS TO DUWAMISH AREA LIFT STATION. SEE CIVIL PLAN. DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER ROUTING EXISTING WET• WELL ACCESS HATCH AT_:GRADE LEVEL ' • • EXISTING STATION WET . WELL • BELOW GROUND` SEAGATE. LIFT STATION - PARTIAL AREA PLAN SCALE: 3/8' =1' -O'- -I 1 .I'.I I 11 1- I 3/8' = 1 .-0' EARTH • . .. Dom -30 -W, 30 -L, 25 "D, PRECAST CONCRETE HANDHOLE •WITH SOLID BASE, • H -20 RATED GALVANIZED DIAMOND PLATE COVER. WITH ..LOCKING LATCH,'UTIUTY VAULT: COMPANY MODEL NO. 3030 -SB OR APPROVED EQUAL :(TYPICAL FOR 2. HANDHOLES) '.• . e EARTH G ADE 12' 24' 00 (D • ELECTRICAL WARING TAPE - 4' CHRUSHED ROCK. COMPACTED . 95 PERCENT FILL • SECTION PULLING HANDHOLE SCALE: 3/4' =1' -0' • ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LEGEND SYMBOL • SYMBOL DESCRIPTION OH — R— LEI 113 EXISTING OVERHEAD CONDUCTORS EXISTING CONDUIT .AND WIRE TO REMAIN EXISTING CONDUIT AND •WIRE TO BE REMOVED CONDUIT ROUTED BELOW GROUND OR. CONCEALED EXPOSED CONDUIT. ' CONDUIT' TURNED' UP OR TOWARDS CONDUIT TURNED DOWN OR AWAY EXPLOSION PROOF CONDUIT SEAL FITTING CONDUCTORS CONNECTED ON WIRING DIAGRAM TERMINAL IN EQUIPMENT PANEL JUNCTION. BOX CIRCUIT BREAKER: AMPERE RATING/No. OF POLES FUSE AMPERE RATING/No: OF POLES THERMAL OVERLOADS CONTACT: NORMALLY OPEN CONTACT: NORMALLY CLOSED LEVEL FLOAT SWITCH -. LIMIT SWITCH. PUSHBUTTON: NORMALLY CLOSED SELECTOR SWITCH: HAND -OFF -AUTO SELECTOR SWITCH: ON -OFF SWITCH TIME CLOCK. MALE PLUG AND FLEXIBLE CORD: DUPLEX RECEPTACLE SPECIAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLE PUSH -TO -TEST INDICATING. LIGHT: R -RED, G -GREEN W -WHITE LIGHT FIXTURE KEY. OPERATED SWITCH MOTOR MAGNETIC. MOTOR STARTER KILOWATT HOUR METER CYCLE COUNTER.: RUNTIME METER CONTROL RELAY: CR-CONTROL. TR-TIME RELAY INTRINSIC BARRIER RELAY AMMETER EXISTING EQUIPMENT DRAWING NOTE SYMBOL'• -. RACEWAY TAG: SEE SCHED: -WITH ONE -LINE. DIAGRAM CONDUIT• GROUND FAULT. CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER HORSEPOWER. VOLTS • - WATTS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION' 3/4/02 '''Call before you Djg.'`- 1- 800 - 424 -5555 R S El UNDERGROUND gnvta DrvD 15dud Smile OE901ED RAS ' DRAIN RAS OEOED RD$ SYN •DATE BY •APPD Engineering Plonn{ng • - • Surveying Penhallegon :Associates Consulting Engineers,: Inc.. 750 SnN sent Some - wua0e. »2 9[OS) . ..•yac.ngRCan 7*F. (425) 527 -7014 -600 -945 -0405 . • 72i.µ25).577 -SW) KIA4,d • Yoder& Way • CM Mum . VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT REFERENCE RIFODIA110N FEID BOCK XX -% • 9A V. CPU FEE DATE MAR. 4, 2002 DATUM: SIPFL 4)3.1194? SCALE • AS SHOWN DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS .SEAGATE LIFT 'STATION PLANS,. . HANDHOLE PLAN & SECTION, LEGEND: • JOB NUMBER . 00111.00 DM ND P0)1IE1.d■0 SIEET E -1 .O• X w 72 "Hx72 "Wx 18 "D NEMA 3R RATED FREE STANDING ENCLOSURE, FABRICATED FROM NO. 12 GAUGE PRE- GALVANIZED STEEL CLOSED CELL NEOPRENE GASKETING ON DOORS, FULL SIZE MOUNTING PANEL OPEN BOTTOM WITH 1/4 "x2 "x2" STEEL L BASE. 3 -POINT ROLLER BAR LATCHING MECHANISM ON DOORS OPERATED BY STAINLESS STEEL PADLOCKABLE HANDLE, POLYESTER POWDER COATED FINISH (WHITE INSIDE, EVERGREEN OUTSIDE), MANUFACTURED BY '. EITHER SKYLINE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING INC., SEATTLE; WA (206-682-4422) OR BY BROWNFIELD MANUFACTURING INC., SNOHOMISH WA (360 -568- 0572). ENCLOSURES BY , .. . OTHER MANUFACTURERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. DISCONNECT SWITCH'. 150A, 3 -POLE FUSED POWER SERVICE 60A, 3 -POLE FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH: FOR FEEDER TO REMOTE. UFT STATION • 1/2" DIA. x 6" GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS (TYP. OF 4 CORNERS). INCANDESCENT FLOODUGHT . .1 -1/2" GRC UGHT POLE STAINLESS STEEL UNISTRUT -� CHANNEL AND. HARDWARE' • ..ALL NEW MATERIAL MOUNTED OUTSIDE ENCLOSURE TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXIST. ENCLOSURE ,RELOCATED EXISTING 'GENERATOR RECEPTACLE • AUTOMATIC 'TRANSFER SWITCH INTRUSION ALARM • UMIT SWITCH ENCLOSURE SHOWN WITH _ DOORS .REMOVED LJ d No. 4 BARS;(TYP.:OF 4) GROUND ROD ELEVATION = SERVICE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE 21" a11 10.■//i/11IlA1�IM/W - SIUCONE SEALANT (GRAY, 50 YEAR, U.V. RESISTANT) BETWEEN ENCLOSURE PERIMETER & CONCRETE BASE 11 11 \ GRADE lir \ / SCALE 1 " =1' -0" XISTING . INTRUSION ALARM. LIMIT SWITCH EXISTING PUMP CONTROL EXIST. — 120/240V PANEL - 1 EXISTING 8 "x8" BOX TO BE_ LL11J REMOVED. PROVIDE 12 GAGE - STEEL PLATE OVER HOLE, SCREW I ATTACHED, PAINTED TO >: 1. MATCH ENCLOSURE 1 :, EXISTING WET- WELL BLOWER 1 1 EXIST. 100A. MAIN BRKR. 78 "L x 24 "W x 24%) CONCRETE BASE WITH 1" CHAMFER ON (4). TOP EDGES - No. 4 HOOP .(TYP. OF 4) 3 ". MIN TYPICAL PANEL UGHT TO BE PROVIDED EXISTING LIFT STATION FREE' STANDING ELECTRICAL' EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE SHOWN WITH DOORS .'. REMOVED EXISTING 100A U11UTY.METER TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED' WITH 200A • • METER IN ADJUSTED LOCATION EXISTING CONDUIT AND WIRE TO BE REMOVED • :EXISTING.. . RUGID TELEMETRY . • RTU PANEL I I I 1:1 It I It y tl I. j•7 \/ V/ \/ • • al' - T. . 1.1 . I 14 � 1 \• \\ �\ / \ /.\ \ \, ) \ \/� ��X�'I': \) „N..//;',r47....” , " / /'/ •kr'�/ / /' // 'Vic, /' /,/ /\ I l r rill I I: I I I I ..' r, • ^ �i ..\,.\/ /' - I I �NNNN,d:ti d d G ,'. •POLEUGHT.SWITCH TO BE PROVIDED EXISTING MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH. EXISTING RECEPTACLE & BACKBOX TO BE REINSTALLED ON SIDE OF EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. PROVIDE BLANK • ON MTS AT ORIGINAL CONDUIT HOLE.. —CUT. OPENING IN BOTTOM OF METAL. ENCLOSURE AND CORE DRILL (4) HOLES IN EXISTING BASE. GROUT AROUND INSTALLED CONDUITS. ' CORE DRILL • (2) • HOLES IN EXISTING • BASE. • GROUT. AROUND INSTALLED CONDUITS.. - EXISTING CONDUITS,(TYP OF 4) ELEVATION .'EXISTING ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE SCALE: . 1" =1' -0" - DETJGS D RAS DRAW RAS CHECKED 'RDS rn REMSKTN DATE BY APPD INTRUSION ALARM UMIT SWITCH ENCLOSURE DOOR' WITH VIEWING WINDOW GENERATOR CONTROL PANEL AIR INTAKE AREA 1 ON OPPOSITE SIDE I • L_ — _ J DOORWAY•OPEN TO SHOW' EQUIPMENT INSIDE ' OUTPUT BREAKER FLEXIBLE CONDUITS (TYP.) FUEL TANK LOCATED WITHIN SUPPORT SKID 3" No. '4 BARS (TYP.- OF 4) / n SOUND ATTENUATED HOUSING SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 16200 • FOR DESCRIPTION :.. ENGINE EXHAUST PIPE ENGINE EXHAUST. AIR GRILL • - ENGINE BLOCK WATER JACKET HEATER ACCESS DOORS: (TYPICAL OF 5) . -1/2" DIA. x 8" GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS TYPICAL. OF 4 LOCATIONS COORDINATED WITH MANUFACTURER SIUCONE SEALANT (GRAY, 50 YEAR,. • • U.V. RESISTANT) ' BETWEEN GENERATOR SUPPORT SKID PERIMETER di CONCRETE BASE GRADE c A >j \T CONCRETE BASE SIZED TO•EXTEND 2" BEYOND ENCLOSURE. WITH 1 ". CHAMFER ON ALL FOUR SIDES • „�- No. 4 -HOOP (TYP, OF 4) 3" MIN TYPICAL ELEVATION -• STANDBY GENERATOR / ENCLOSURE SCALE 1 " =1' -0" 200A UTIUTYMETER TO . BE PROVIDED - EXISTING 100A UTILITY METER TO BE REMOVED • EXISTING' CONDUIT AND WIRE TO BE REMOVED. � EXISTING UFT STATION FREE STANDING: . .ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE CORE DRILL (2) HOLES IN EXISTING BASE. GROUT AROUND INSTALLED 18 MIN. GRADE • \ \ \/ ' ,//,//./"P/ \iVvii/ / S%�iX.i \ '. ii \ / \ /i< /i %i. /\ fit----- ''..r3 ELEVATION - EXIST. ELECT. EQUIP. ENCLOSURE SCALE: PRELIMPNARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 3/4/02 EXISTING, 120/240.V' LOAD CENTER EXISTING' MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH EXISTING LIFT STATION FREE' STANDING • ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE .- EXISTING RUGID TELEMETRY RTU ENCLOSURE CUT OPENING IN BOTTOM OF, METAL ENCLOSURE. AND CORE' DRILL (4) HOLES IN EXISTING BASE. GROUT. AROUND INSTALLED CONDUITS. .' . GRADE /% MIN. SECTION -. EXIST. ELECT.' EQUIP. ENCLOSURE Engineering ... - Planning . S.r• eying Penhallegon: Associates .Consulting Engineers, Inc.. 250 1wr. m..1 South .:.rte. WA O3.3 • ' d � 527 -20t. - top- B.S -$.O an i . KAk4nd' •.- 'F.dw.l. War CI. EA.nr ' :VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT REFERENCE INFORWIIW . FELD BOCK XX -X SURV. CPU EIP DATE MAR. • 4, .2002.- DATTN: SUPPL ADJ. 1A47 SCALE . SCALE: 1' =1 -0" - . RSE Word WO' • • SCALE IN FEET DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS SEAGATE LIFT STATION ELEVATIONS & SECTION Call before you Dis• 1- 800 - 424 -5555 1 F%AACS: °/r /0 I JCS NUMBER 00111.00 DWG NO. P0111E2dp sEE1 E -2 OF X — INCANDESCENT FLOODUGHT . STAINLESS STEEL UNISTRUT • CHANNEL :AND HARDWARE. - • 108•. • UFT STATION POWER - AND CONTROL 'PANEL STATION•ALARM STROBE BEACON, PROVIDE SIUCON - SEALANT.BETWEEN FIXTURE AND ENCLOSURE • ROOF- • • . ENCLOSURE INTERIOR UGHT. MOUNTED ON BACK OF FRONT FACE INTRUSION ALARM UMIT 'SWITCHES (TYPICAL OF 2) -. l84'Hx72'Wx 18-D NEMA 3R RATED FREE STANDING ENCLOSURE SHOWN WITH DOORS REMOVED, 18• FRONTSIDE ROOFLINE EXTENTION, FABRICATED / '.''. FROM NO. 12 GAUGE PRE - GALVANIZED STEEL, CLOSED CELL NEOPRENE GASKETING ON DOORS, FULL . SIZE MOUNTING PANEL, OPEN BOTTOM WITH 1/4'x2'x2° STEEL L BASE. 3- POINT. ROLLER BAR LATCHING MECHANISM ON DOORS OPERATED BY STAINLESS STEEL PADLOCKABLE HANDLE, 'WELDED BRACKETS FOR MOUNTING INTERIOR LIGHT AND LIMIT SWITCHES, POLYESTER POWDER COATED FINISH (WHITE INSIDE. EVERGREEN OUTSIDE), MANUFACTURED BY EITHER SKYLINE ELECTRIC & MANUFACTURING INC., SEATTLE,. WA (206- 682 -4422) OR BY BROWNFIELD.MANUFACTURING INC., SNOHOMISH WA (360 - 568 - 0572). ENCLOSURES BY OTHER MANUFACTURERS WILL NOT BE. ACCEPTED. - PUMP NO. 2 ACCESS HATCH AT GRADE ' INTRUSION ENABLE /DISABLE KEY SWITCH 1 -1/2- CONDULET FITTING • • • EYS CONDUIT SEAL FITTING • WET WELL BLOWER ULTRASONIC CONTROLLER/TRANSMITTER - HIGH./ LOW LEVEL ALARM FLOATS I��IBI�lf�isl' M f 4 14 u _.: • 11 11 11 I 1.1 11 • 11 11 ' a. - 1 o��AAAxw1� II II � 0UN2 • �- RECEPTACLE FOR PORTABLE GENERATOR CONNECTION PUMP FEEDER. SEE UPPER LEVEL PLAN (TYPICAL) FLOAT CABLES, SEE UPPER -7 LEVEL PLAN (TYPICAL) 30 ULTRASONIC LEVEL .SENSOR -PUMP NO. .1 60A, 3 -POLE, NEMA 1, FUSED MANUAL TRANSFER SWITCH 1/2- DIA.-x 6° GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS (TYP..OF 4 CORNERS) /-SIUCONE SEALANT (GRAY, 50 YEAR, U.V. RESISTANT) BETWEEN ENCLOSURE PERIMETER & CONCRETE BASE GRADE \/� 102'L "x 24•W x 24•D CONCRETE .. �� BASE. WITH 1' CHAMFER ON (4) : TOP EDGES. - No 4 HOOP (TYP. OF 5) PLAN - LIFT STATION WET WELL :LOWER: LEVEL SCALE: 1 /2 - =1 . -0• . INTRUSION- OMIT SWITCH UGHT FIXTURE —, • -•I • PUMP CABLE SPUCE- BOX J -1 PER DETAIL' 'No. 4. BARS • (TYPICAL OF 4) - GROUND ROD • . • PENETRATION SEAL FITTING PER DETAIL (TYPICAL) A ELEVATION =•ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE KE3 • SCALE: 1•= 1' -0' END OF CONDUIT ACCESS DOORS STAINLESS STEEL KELLUMS • CABLE GRIP (TYPICAL) GRADE - \ CABLE HANGER -0 ..: SEE DETAIL Ark • ® • •• FLOAT CABLE SPUCE BOX .0-2 o. - SEE DETAIL Q .SCALE -IN FEET: • METER BOX AND CONCRETE PADS .SEE DETAIL GROUND' CONNECTION AT 4' FORCE MAIN. , •\ . \.. / _ — .- - - . • !'- :r \ .: •�ACCESS.DOORS AT GRADE • ©/ • -. .- :. ° INTRUSION ' UMIT SWITCH.:.. • /5 FLOAT CABLE SPUCE .BOX J -2. ir- SEE DETAIL 9i 'UNDERGROUND CONDUITS TO \ "Nit. • SEAGATE UFT' STATION. 'SEE • rim no Aunkinc CAD onl moan SEAGATE UFT STATION. SEE • CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ROUTING ULTRASONIC "LEVEL SENSOR SEE DETAILS _ • p A PE,NETRION SEAL FITTING PER DETAIL 0.1/ � • (TYPICAL) SEWER '.EASMENT CABLE HANGER • SEE "DETAIL. HIGH LEVEL ALARM FLOAT SEE DRWG. E5 FOR ELEVATION - ENCLOSURE ROOF'- EXTENT1ON. UNDERGROUND' PVC AIR DUCT. LOW LEVEL ALARM FLOAT. SEE DRWG. E5 FOR ELEVATION PRELIMINARY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 3/4/02 • CONCRETE BASE SERVICE DISCONNECT SWITCH ULTRASONIC CONTROLLER/TRANSMITTER POWER AND. CONTROL PANEL \-'WET .WELL ' BLOWER LL POLE MOUNTED- UGH T.FIXTURE ELECTRICAL' EQUIPMENT.ENCLOSURE Call before you Djg. 1 -800- 424 -5555 - UNDERGROUND SEANCE (USA) SECTION - WET WELL SCALE: 1/2"•1'-0" 'PLAN LIFT STATION GRADE & WET WELL UPPER LEVEL' SCALE: 1/2"=1'-07 STATION • ALARM /2- =1' -O- RSE lichani Staple COOED RAS DRAM WAS - OEOED RDS :Engineering ' Planning ' Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 5.0, Street South •. IC+1d d. 04 • 03033. •�•.pa• -.Y•�^ we (425) 827 -10,. . .1- 130 - 945 -E.0! . FAX (415) 327 -5043 • Stu REN90) DATE • BY APP.!) . Kh*S. tl . FMRrtl W 7 ' - Ch EAR» VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT' REFERENCE I0DR(AIRN FEID BOON: xx -x SURV. CPU FIE: DAZE • .MAR 4, 2002" DAMS . . SUPPL ADJ. 1947. AS SHOWN DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS - . LIFT STATION - PLANS, SECTION, ' ELECT. EQUIP. ENCLOSURE ELEVATION EXPIRES: 3 /29/03 JCS NIA®ER 00111:00 DWG N0. P011153.0R9 SHEET E -3 _OF_ _ X 8 8 8 ss 8 8 20 10 200' HIGH IMPACT AREA 100' HAY IMPACT ZONE.■ GROUND 'OP ;OF BANII E1EV'- 15.0* 0 +00 20 10 1 +00 - 40TH AVE: S`. fMAEI 2 +00 SECTION 1 200• HIW PACT ARPA PROW A 110. COOMBE ,100" LOW RPAOT 2010 o<B ELEV- iS.S"3 0 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 SECTION .14r-vggr---Eare_ Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. ' UFAN NI ELEV 4 0* ....Z ACC— 0. 06T- l'L+ 20 10 200' HIGH IMPACT AREA b3,CWrtaa["T\ - 100' LOW (PACT 20NE•■ \� ELEV.- 18.83 rl 10P OF BANK 1 6'2,111 (1).. 01E -1A1 (al) UFAN WATER MARK 200' HIGH IMPACT AREA 20 • 10 0 0 0 +00 . 1 +00 2 +00: SECTION .3 :. S 119TH " STREET zoo' HIGH TRACT AREA 100' LOW IMPACT ZONE 10. 11 p P001BIm0E TOP OF BANK 1 ElE1l = 18.83 MEAN HIG I ELEV 5 WATER M 0 +00 . ': ::. 1 +00 '. 2 +00 SECTION 4 TYPICAL SECTIONS Duwamish Area Sewer Improvements 100' LOW OIPACT ME. . OF BANK 20.03 ELEV m l5, G WATER M 0 +00 . 1 +00 SCALE: 1 = 50' HORIZONTAL 1" = 5' VERTICAL 2 +00 SECTION '5. ',YORAM MEMO A BATTER O P P v DIBT2JTcT P /00/0111.00 /CAD/0111EAH2.DWC • • RECEIVED FEB :14 Z002' •„ COMMUNm DEVELOPMENT 9m �. II IIIII " 9E e pint: gL76.000 FILTER FABRIC t STAPLES OR INCS FIL BO' WIDE ROILS. USE TO ATTATCN FABRIC TO WIRE. 2' BY 2' 14 11. WIRE FABRIC OR ECUIV. BURY BOTTOM OF FABRIC MATERIAL IN 8' BY 12' TRENCH FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 2' BY 2' BY 14 GA. WIRE FABRIC OF EQUIV. PROVIDE 3/4' 1.8' WASHED GRAVEL BACKFILL IN TRFRCN AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC CN THE SURFACE. 2' BY 4' WOOD POST ALT: STEEL FENCE POSTS. FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL NTS 8' MIN. FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOTES 1 . filter joints purchased In a necesssary.cefnilte�l cloth shall b. spliced together enlyro0 to avoid support pest. •its s minima 0-Inch overlap. and both ends securely fastened to the poet. fence S. 11 fabric installed follow o n ges /eAel1be paoed a olmliaow of 6 feeapartand driven securely the ground (minima ' of 30 Lobes). g, A Ir..eh .hall be ...mooted. roughly 8 Inches .Ids and 12 inches deep. upelope and adjacent to IM weed peel to allow the filter fabric to be burled. 4, wee .1e.4erd strength flit.? fabric Is used. o wire mash support fence shall be fastened esawty to the unstop. side of the pasts wing heavy -duty wire staples at least I inch long, tie wires 01 hog rings. The wire shall extend into the trench a minimum of 4 Inches and shall not es l.wd awre then 36 Indoor above the original ground surface. O. f�t.e d Strength filter into tl.s trench. The fablric shall notoextend were than 38l iinnches above Moll IM wilinel ground surface. Filter fabric shall not be stapled to existing trees. then ..lre- .Irwpth filter fabric and Dieter post spacing are used, the .Ire cash support loses soy be eliminated. In such a case. the filter fabric Is stapled or wired directly to too posts .Ito ell ether presleloes of Standard Mote S. applying. 1. The *rem* shell be bod,fIlled with 3/4 -Inch m1.0..n dloneter sashed gravel. t, 9111.. f..r1e fencee shell be r4aov.d when they have served their useful purpose. but not he/w. the upelope area has bean permanently stabilised. 0. FI11w fabric fences shell be Inepested immediately after each rainfall and at least dolly during prolonged rainfall. Any required repairs shall be mod. inmsdlately. t. 5' -0' 1r MEL al> C NSTRIICTIDN ENTRANCES SHALL BE PLACED g 0. AT ALL LDCATUBIS USED BY CONTRACTOR RS WHICH MAY CAUSE TRAOdNG DOD PUBLIC i3 REMIT-CIF-WAY. SUCH P1PE YARDS. FIELD igOFFICES, AND OTHER CCUSTRUCTIEIN ACTIVITY.. SO WOAD 108. Y1.. W w.. R 2S' MIN. EXISTING DRIVEWAY RAMP OR SITE ACCESS L Use 4' to 8' �sDcU Meterd .Ito 'floes" quarry sacceplo6 rode far srrFcdnG as stwwn L The 100' newest toroth shall be lengthened is necessary to haw materiel 40 rot 4vdted bite the public right- of-.ay. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ARMOR FIRST STAKE TO AN PREVIOUSLY LAID BAIL. 2 REIMS. STEEL PICKETS OR 2' K 2' STARS 11/2' TO 2' IN THE GROUND ANMORING BALES MINT A MOULD BE NIGHER THAN POINT B PROPER PLACEMENT OF STRAP BALE BARRIER IN DRAINAGE 8AY WEDGE LOOSE STRAW 8!78891 BALES NOTE: ' INSTALL EITHER CHECK DAM OR STRAW BALES, AS APPROPRIATE IN LOCATIONS SUSCEPTIBLE TO DITCH EROSION. AND AS A MINIMUM ALONG DITCHES NOTED IN THE FILTER FENCE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. . STRAW AND HAY BALE BARRIERS NT8 etrzeftco 10110 comm. WA90RWaA SV(8= WATER CESCM KOVAL LOG CHECK DAM L = THE DISTANCE SUCH THAT POINTS A 8 8 ARE OF EQUAL ELEVATION. L _ H I SUMP SPACING BETWEEN CHECK DAMS CHECK DAM DETAIL 24' ROCK CHECK DAM 2' — 4' ROCK FLOW sae'_•.. - -__. sees ROCK CHECK DAM 2 NT8 { AIIAPIER 810Rr 11111 TO 161801 S -S Or0RA1E MEDIEVAL STRAP GEOIE ULE FABRIC OVERFLOW 8YPA5S FOR PEAK STOW YOUIES SEDIMENT ACCUMULA11011 NOTES 1. INSERT SHALL RE DLSTAIIID 8840 TO CLEARING; AN) GRAMS ACTN1Y. OR UM RAOnEIT Cr A NEW CATCH RA57L 2. SEDIMENT SNAIL BE RIMMED FROM THE UNIT WHEN R BECOMES HALF FULL . 3 SEDWENT Ni R REMOVAL SHALL E AC U9E RENOWN) D BY RENO TIE 0410T, EMPTYING. AND INTERIM CB PROTECTION NTS EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES 1. Approved of this erosion /sedimentation control (ESC) plan does not constitute an approval of permanent road or drainage design (e.g. size and location of roads, pipes, restrictor5, do:minds. retention facilities. utilities. eta). 2. The implementation of these ESC plane and the construction, maintenance, replacement and upgrading f these approved. facilities is the responsibility of the applicant /contractor until all 3. The boundaries of the encoring limits shown on this plan stall be dearly flogged in the field prior to limits shall be permitted. Tgie the constructial flagging shall bepmallnntained by applicant /contracctt r far the doming duration of construction. 4. The ESC facilities shown an this plan must be constructed in conjnctian with all clearing and grading activities, and in such a manner as to insure that sedknent laden water does not enter the drainage sysem or violate applicable water standards. (KCC 9.04.020 AA. KCRS 7.09 0). 5. The ESC fadOties shown an this plan are the minbnum requbamants for antidpatedsite conditlan. During the construction period. these ESC facilities shall be upgraded (e.g. odditicrial dumps, relocation of ditches and sot fences, eta) as needed far unexpected storm events (KCC 9.04.090 82). 6. The ESC facilities shall be inspected daily by the applicant /controctar and maintained as necessary to ensure theb• continued functioning (KCC 9.04.090 82). 7. Any area stripped of vegetation. Induding roadway embanlanants, where no further work Is anticipated for a period 01 15 days, shall be immediately stabilized with the approved ESC methods (e.g. seeding, muldolng, netting erosion blankets, etc.) (KCRS 7.090). 8. Any area needing ESC measure, not requbbng Immediate attention, shall be addressed within fifteen (15) days. 9. The ESC facilities on inactive sites shall be Inspected and maintained a minbnum of once a month ar within the 48 hours following a storm event. 10. At no time shall more than one foot of sediment be allowed to accumulate within a catch basin. All catch basins and conveyance lines shall be deaned prior to paving. The cleaning operation shall not flush sediment laden water into the downstream system. 11. Stabe(zed construction entrances and wash pads shall be installed at the beginning of constructon and maintained for the duration of the project Additional measures may be required to insure that all paved areas are kept dean far the duration of the project (ROW 46.81.855). 12. During the One period of November 1 through March 31, all project disturbed areas greater than 5,000 square feet that are to be left unmarked for more than 12 hours shall be covered by one of the followng cover measures mulch. sodding or pkestla covering. 13. Any permanent retention /detention facility used as a temmperary settling basin shall be modified with the necessary erosion control measures and shall provide adequate storage capacity. If The permanent facility Is to function ultimately as an infiltration or dispersion system, The feaTlty shall not be used as a temporary settling basin. No underground detention tanks or vaults shill be used as a temporary settling basin. 14. Where seeding for temporary erosion control Is required fast germinating grosses shall be appfled at an appropriate ante (e.g. annual or perennial rye applied at approximately 80 pounds per acre). 15. Where straw mulch for temporary erosion control la required, it shall be, applied at a minimum thickness of two inches. Engineering Planning Survrying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, inc. 750 Sam Strwl South Pint (433) 037 -2514 DAZE B1 Kirtland 1-j.100A4}a4ae 1AR: (43S) 037 -7043 • Fran NOW • CUM= VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT REFERENCE D60WAilON FEND BOOK: SWIM. CPU OLE: 0111SRVARC DA1U1t 001E APRIL. 2002 SOME AS NOTED DUWAMISH AREA IMPROVEMENTS EROSION CONTROL DETAILS Call before you Djg. 1- 800 - 424 -5555 MOO:ROOO SOME (LOA) 17w an 04/24/x0 I E8 NUM 00111.00 DM NO. P011ISID- DE'T5.d.0 sfErRS -12cs 52