Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E02-020 - CITY OF TUKWILA - FOSTER GOLF CLUBHOUSEFOSTER GOLF CLUBHOUSE DEMOLISH & REBUILD CLUBHOUSE, RESTAURANT & PARKING LOT 13500 INTERURBAN AVE. S. E02 -020 Carol Lumb - Foster Golf Links Clubhou Pa •e From: "Leonard Forsman - LAAS" <Iforsman.laas@attglobal.net> To: <rstill@ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 2/21/03 1:52PM Subject: Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Rick, John Stamets sent me the attached images of the clubhouse. The attached images are scanned from the contact sheets John produced from the large format negatives. Of course, the final 8 x 10 prints will be of much higher quality. LAAS will be preparing a written history of the clubhouse based on archival research and discussions with informants. Historic photographs from the collection of Billy Aliment will also be incorporated into the documentation package. Please let me know if you have any questions. Respectfully, Leonard Forsman Anthropologist/Archaeologist Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited 7700 Pioneer Way, Suite 101 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 -1164 Office: (253) 858 -1411 Fax: (253) 858 -1410 MEMORANDUM TO: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner FROM: Rick Still, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: February 20, 2003 SUBJECT: Foster Golf Links — Old Clubhouse Historical Display COPY: Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation Foster Golf Links — Old Clubhouse Historical Display A portion of a wall in the new Foster Golf Links Clubhouse will be dedicated for a historical perspective of the current clubhouse. It is our hope that we will be able to present a historical narrative supported by new and old photographs of the facility. Attached please find a photo proof sheet of the photographs taken by our Professional Historian to comply with OAHP. We hope that we can provide a display that people young and old can enjoy. Historical Memo to Carol 2 -20-03 STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 - Olympia, Washington 98501 (Mailing Address) PO Box 48343 - Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 586-.3065 Fax Number (360)5864067 February 11, 2003 Ms. Lynn Larson President Larson Anthropogical Services Limited 7700 Pioneer Way, Suite 101 Gig Harbor, WA 98335 -1164 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 020603 -14-KI Property: FOSTER GOLF LINKS CLUBHOUSE Re: Determination of Effect Dear Ms. Larson: Thank you for contacting the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP). The above referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer under provisions of Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended) and 36 CFR Put 800. My review is based upon documentation contained in your communication. I concur that the current project as proposed will have an "ADVERSE EFFECT" on this National Register eligible resource. As such, your proposed mitigation measures will be sufficient to document the loss of this resource. 1 would highly encourage the City of Tukwila to incorporate an interpretive display of the history of the Foster Links Golf Club into the design of its new facility. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact tae. Sincerely, Michael Houser Architectural Historian (360) 586 -3076 Michaell i @teed_ wo. go v STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 - Olympia, Washington 98501 (Mailing Address) PO Box 48343 - Olympia, Washington 98504 -8343 (360) 586 -3065 Fax Number (360) 586 -3067 January 7, 2003 Mr. Rick Still Assistant Director, Parks & Rec City of Tukwila 12424 42nd Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 010703 -31 -KI Property: WINDROW, GEORGE & EDDY HOUSE Re: Determination of Eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places Dear Mr. Still: Thank you for contacting the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP). The above referenced property has been reviewed on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer under provisions of Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended) and 36 CFR Part 800. My review is based upon documentation contained in your communication. Research indicates that,the above referenced property is not currently listed in the Washington Heritage Register or National Register of Historic Places. I concur that the referenced property is NOT ELIBIBLE for the National Register of Historic Places due to is low level of integrity. As a result of this finding, further contact with OAHP is not necessary. However, if additional information on the property becomes available, or if any archaeological resources are uncovered during construction, please halt work in the area of discovery and contact the appropriate Native American Tribes and OAHP for further consultation. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Houser Architectural Historian (360) 586 -3076 MichaelH @cted.wa.gov A Memorandum LARSON ANf ROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SERVICES LIMITED To: Rick Still, Assistant Director, City of Tukwila, Parks and Recreation Department From: Lynn L. Larson, President, Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited Subject: Foster Golf Course Green House (George Eddy House and Windrow) Historic Building Inventory Date: December 27, 2002 Please find enclosed the Washington State Historic Building Inventory Form for the George Eddy House and Windrow. Preliminary consultation with the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) and the King County Landmarks and Heritage Program (KCLH) indicate that the George Eddy House and Windrow, also known as the Foster Golf Course Green House, does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (Houser 2002; Sundberg 2002). We have enclosed three extra forms for you to submit to the OAHP and the KCLH to request a formal evaluation opinion. Please send one copy of each form to the following individuals with a letter requesting their concurrence: of Michael Houser Architectural Historian Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, Washington 98504 -8343 Rick Anderson Cartographer Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, Washington 98504 -8343 CharlieSundberg Preservation Planner King County Landmarks and Heritage Program 506 Second Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98104 -2307 Please call if you have any questions. 7700 PIONEER WAY SUITE 101 GIG HARBOR WASHINGTON 98335.1 164 TEL: (253 1 858.1 4 1 1 FAX: 12531 858.1 410 Page 1 From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/23/02 8:44AM Subject: Re: Contacting DCD Via E -Mial During the Holidays Hi Don: The minutes haven't been prepared yet. Typically they are done in time for the mailing for the next Planning Commission meeting, which is the week before the meeting. Since you've indicated that you're planning to appeal the decision, we'll be sending a copy of the tapes out for a verbatim transcript (usually Wynetta just prepares a summary of the meeting, but not a verbatim transcript). You're welcome to come in and listen to the tapes. I'll need some advance notice as Wynetta is out until Jan 2 and I'll need help getting the equipment set up for you to listen to the proceedings. I also wanted to talk to you a bit about the appeal on the Special Permission Parking decision. That decision is strictly on how many parking stalls are needed for a particular use if that use is not specifically identified in our parking code. The decision doesn't address location or design of the parking lot. I'll update my e-mail address for you. I didn't realize it had changed. I'll see you tomorrow at Foster Golf course. Carol »> Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> 12/21/02 11:22AM »> Thanks for the heads -up. Could I get a copy of the meeting minutes from the planning meeting? I can't remember what I said let alone everyone else. Lastly I just noticed your using my old E -mail address. Please update to this one. - -- Carol Lumb <clumbci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Hi Don: > I just wanted to give you a heads up that our > internet connection will be down December 26 and > 27th while work is done on our server. In case you > need to contact us on those 2 days, please call me > (431 -3661) or the Department (431- 3670). I will be > out of the office December 30 and 31st, returning > January 2. > Happy Holidays! > Carol Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re trod Trees Page 1 From: Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> To: Carol Lumb <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/19/02 10:36AM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees I thinking just the parking lot one now. I need to read all the stuff this weekend and make a final decision. - -- Carol Lumb <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Don: Thursday and Friday are also full working days > here. Which land use action are you appealing? > Carol > »> Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> 12/19/02 >09:31AM >» > Is the DCD the same place I get the sign permits? 1 > assume Tuesday will be a parial day but is the > office > open normal hours on Thursday and Friday? > Thanks again for the information I got from Cathy. > 1 > was wonder if I'm missing a report. Several people > at > the meeting mentioned core samples being taken from > the trees. But I can't find any mention of them in > Mr. > Gilles report. > Also is there any past records of the health of > these > trees? I was wondering if one was done when the > retaining wall was put in. > - -- Carol Lumb <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > > I just re -read your e-mail and realized I didn't > > answer your second question: The appeal is > > delivered to DCD and we then take care of getting > it > > to the Council, as they will consider the appeal. Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re-'-,00d Trees Page 1 From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/19/02 10:18AM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Don: Tuesday is a full working day here. DCD is where the sign permits are issued - right next door to City Hall in what was formerly the Minolta Building (6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100). As to the core samples, I thought they were referenced in the arborist's reports. Otherwise you could check with Parks Dept. since they are the applicant. They may also have information about previous investigations on the health of the trees when the retaining wall was installed. Carol »> Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> 12/19/02 09:31AM Is the DCD the same place I get the sign permits? I assume Tuesday will be a parial day but is the office open normal hours on Thursday and Friday? Thanks again for the information I got from Cathy. I was wonder if I'm missing a report. Several people at the meeting mentioned core samples being taken from the trees. But I can't find any mention of them in Mr. Gilles report. Also is there any past records of the health of these trees? I was wondering if one was done when the retaining wall was put in. - -- Carol Lumb <clumb(aci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > 1 just re -read your e-mail and realized I didn't > answer your second question: The appeal is > delivered to DCD and we then take care of getting it > to the Council, as they will consider the appeal. »> Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re 'Mood Trees Page 1 From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/18/02 3:03PM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Hi Don: thanks for the heads up on the appeal. There is no application form for the appeal. the Notice of Decision spells out the criteria that must be addressed in the appeal (see also TMC 18.116.030). And you will have an additional 7 days to file as I discovered that the appeal period is 21 days for this action, not 14. You will receive a revised Notice of Decision in the mail soon, but the new deadline is Friday, January 3, at 5:00 p.m. for the receipt of the appeal. If you have any questions, please let me know. My telephone # is 431 -3661. Carol P.S. I am sending home with Kathy Stetson a copy of the arborist reports to add to the other materials you requested. I don't think your earlier e-mail specified which consultant analysis you wanted. I assumed it was the environmental analysis, but thought I should include the arborist analysis just in case that was the one you wanted. »> Don Scanlon <donscan(c�donscan.org> 12/18/02 01:25PM »> I want to thank you for all your help. It is very much appreciated. I do plan to appeal and have two questions. 1) Is there a special form for the appeal or is an informal letter OK? 2) Where do I deliver the appeal and what is the office schedule for next week? thanks, From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/18/02 3:38PM Subject: Appeal Don: you didn't mention what action you are appealing. The Design Review action would be a closed record hearing before the City Council. It is that decision by the BAR that has the 21 day appeal period. The decision on the Special Permission Parking is an administrative decision; the appeal period on that is still 14 days. As no open record hearing has been held yet on that decision, an appeal would be considered by the City Council at an open record hearing. For any appeal, the criteria in TMC 18.116.030 must be addressed, particularly #3, identifying the alleged errors in the decision (errors of fact or errors in application of the law, the harm suffered or anticipated and the relief sought). Let me know if you have any questions. Carol Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re• —ood Trees From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/17/02 10:29AM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees You're right it is. I will put a copy of that with the Adolfson analysis. The MDNS includes the conditions that are in the SEPA staff report. Carol »> Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> 12/17/02 10:19AM »> Thanks for sending these items. I was thinking the MDNS was something different from the SEPA report. - -- Carol Lumb <clumbci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Don: Attached to this e-mail is a copy of the SEPA > staff report and Steve Lancaster's memo discussing > his review of the comments that came in and the > analysis we received from Adolfson. I sent you this > memo last week (12/9) along with the design review > staff report but I'll send it again for context. > I'll give Kathy Stetson a copy of the Adolfson > analysis to bring home tonight. If you have any > questions, please let me know. My telephone # is > 206 - 431 -3661. > Thanks. > Carol > »> Don Scanlon <donscan(a donscan.org> 12/15/02 > 09:07PM »> > Can I get a copy of the SEPA determination and the > technical analysis by the consulting firm. > thanks, > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application /msword > ATTACHMENT part 3 application /msword Carol Lumb -'Re: Foster Golf course Red■'god Trees From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/17/02 9:49AM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Don: Attached to this e-mail is a copy of the SEPA staff report and Steve Lancaster's memo discussing his review of the comments that came in and the analysis we received from Adolfson. I sent you this memo last week (12/9) along with the design review staff report but Ill send it again for context. I'll give Kathy Stetson a copy of the Adolfson analysis to bring home tonight. If you have any questions, please let me know. My telephone # is 206 - 431 -3661. Thanks. Carol »> Don Scanlon <donscanAdonscan.org> 12/15/02 09:O7PM »> Can I get a copy of the SEPA determination and the technical analysis by the consulting firm. thanks, • 'DAVID A. CLARE ARCHITECTS, PLIC, A Washington Professional Limited Liability Company Licensed and Registered Architects in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Washington ( Caroi Lumb - _Trees at Fos-ter-doff CoursP _ __ " . _ _,. __.._____.._ Page 1 From: Carol Lumb To: Internet :EmelieMontgomery@netscape.net Date: 12/12/02 5:04PM Subject: Trees at Foster Golf Course Dear Ms. Montgomery: I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. I was in the process of responding to your e-mail on Monday when my computer went down. I am attaching several documents for your review. The first is a copy of the staff report for the design review hearing that will be held tonight (Thursday, December 12) at Tukwila City Hall, beginning at 7:00 p.m. This hearing is before the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review to consider the design of the proposed club house. I am also attaching to this e-mail the memorandum sent by the Director of the Department , Steve Lancaster, to the SEPA file on his reconsideration of the SEPA determination of the clubhouse. Mr. Lancaster prepared the memorandum after reviewing both the comments received on the SEPA determination and a technical analysis by an environmental consulting firm, Adolfson and Associates on the habitat issues raised as they relate to the Endangered Species Act. The City's regulations permit clearing of trees in sensitive areas and requires replacement of these trees based on a sliding scale in TMC 18.54130. These regulations only apply in sensitive areas, in this case the shoreline. The remaining trees are not regulated and can be removed without a permit. The Parks Dept. had a professional arborist examine the windrow to determine their health and condition. The arborists report indicates that the majority of the windrow trees are in poor to fair condition and recommends that all be remove due to the potential for "catastrophic failure in the future." Again, my apologies for the delay in getting back to you. You are welcome to come down and review the arborist's report on the trees as well as the Adolfson analysis. If you have any questions or want to arrange to see the files, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. If you would like a copy of the Notice of Decision on the design review hearing mailed to you, please provide me with a mailing address. Thank you. Carol Lumb Senior Planner Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us Dec 02 09:57a. Brill Gilles Brian K. Gilles 425-922 -6314 IIP FAX C Hazardous Tree Evaluations & Appraisals Site Analysis &Development Review Urban. Forest Planning & Wildlife Management SHEET TO: Carole Lumb, Planning DATE: December 11, 2002 FAX #: 206- 431 -3665 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET: 4 RECEIVED DEC 12 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: FOSTER GOLF LINKS REVISION TO THE BLUE SPRUCE AND COAST REDWOOD TREE EVALUATION, DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2002 Carol, Here is the revision letter of which we spoke. I am quite chagrinned to have made such a glaring error. My apologies to you and to Rick. Hard copies are in tomorrow's mail. Regards, Brian K:`Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certification # PN -0260 19079 lU G 1117 •1.. Dlene - h'Irlelonel %A /A O0( • AOIv070_AOOA • Gov A0S.0•7_R91 A • G -moil• I krdIloc (Al onl nnen p.1 pez... 14i 02 05: 13p Brian Gilles 425-822-6314 • • Gilles Consulting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5 — 8 2 2 4 9 9 4 Rick Still, Assistant Director. Tukwila Parks and Recreation 12424 42nd Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 • SUBJECT: REVISED EVALUATION OF. BLUE SPRUCE AND COAST REDWOOD TREES AT FOSTER GOLF LINKS Dear Mr. Still: It.was pointed out to me today that .1 made. an error in my report of the Blue Spruce and Coast Redwood trees dated.November 20, 2002. The error was in the Executive Summary on Page One of the report, and the Summary/Conclu,sion4 section. at the bottom . of Page.Two.: These.two sections should . have the same trees noted.as good, fair, and poor as on Attachment.1;•Tree Inventory/Condition Spreadsheet, Page Four of Nine of the November 20, 2002 report.. • • • • The.Executive-Summary should read as follows: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: • • . . . • Trees #3 and 4.are Blue Spruce and•trees #5 through12•are Redwood. Trees #3, 4, .5 and . 6 are in poor condition and will not survive lOng-term. Trees 9, 10, ll, and 12 are in poor to fair condition. Trees.7 and 8 are in good condition HoweVer,.all of the Redwood trees have suffered significant root loss during the. construction of the parking lots and retaining wall. The.resultantdamageoften causes significant root Tot, that can . take decades to manifest itself Given the genetics.of these trees that grow to such • immense size, I recommend that all ten of these trees be removed. The Summary/Conclusions should read as follows: .SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: • - • Trees 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11; and 12 are in poor or fair condition. Trees 7 and 8 are in good • condition. It is obvious, however, that large roots were cut and damaged at some time in the past to.install the parking lot and .retaining wall. Coast Redwood trees are the largest trees in North America and can grow for thousands of years-in their native habitats where .• they have extensive .root •systems .- Leavingthese.giant trees in such a small planter may be inviting catastrophic failure in the future due to lack of adequate root space and the P • 2 Fax: 425-822-6314 E—mail: bkgillas@aol.com 12823 NE 107th Place Kirkland, WA 98033 Dec 11; 02 05; 13p Brian Gilles • 425-822-6314 411 root rot caused from previous construction damage. Therefore, I recommend removal of all ten trees. SITE PLAN: Also attached is copy of the site plan with the trees numbered. WAIVER OF LIABILITY: There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. As conditions change is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long-term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required permits from the city, county, stated, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs. I hope this report answers your questions. Please call me if I can provide more information or be of further service. Sincerely, (,_.) Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist — PN-0260 Attachments: 1. Site Plan with Trees numbered and located Foster Golf Links Evaluation of Spruce and Redwood Trees November 20, 2002 Page 2 of 2 P • 3 Deb 1,2;02 10:48a Brian Gilles \ON'l 425 - 822 -6314. p.2 o,• • i.YLM`.._•hr_ Wf • . o Cs. : • :Z •••• li�lT��URt I1:1 \'II) :1. (;I.. \ItK :110:111 1 1A: i s, I'I.I_(: December 11, 2002 Mr. Bruce Fletcher, Parks and Recreation Director City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department 12424 — 42 "d Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 Re: Clubhouse Feasibility Study, Foster Golf Links Dear Bruce, At your request, I have reviewed the parking analysis prepared during the Phase One portion of the work for the Foster Golf Course project. As you know, the seating capacity of the facility has been reduced slightly as the design development work has progressed. The new analysis has indicated that the parking demand will require 280 stalls for the facility, a decrease of 6 total stalls. At your direction, I will revise the site plan to reflect the total count of 280 parking stalls. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, David A. Clark AIA Principal 0 6 V U ao 0 r o Ste- n L 0 2— C7u s z 5 • W N A Washington Professional Limited Liability Company Licensed and Registered.4rchitects in Arizona, California, Colorado. Hawaii, Texas and Washington Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re d Trees From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/11/02 5:16PM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Yes, it is at 7:00 at City Hall. The Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing on the design of the clubhouse. Please call me at 431 -3661 if you have any questions prior to the hearing. »> Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> 12/11/02 04:37PM »> Is there a planning meeting thursday night that I could attend? - =- Carol Lumb <clumbc ci.tukwila.wa.us> wrote: > Hi Don: thanks very much for your comments on the > trees at the Foster Golf Course. 1 am attaching a > copy of the memorandum that Steve Lancaster prepared > after reviewing both the comments received on the > SEPA determination and a technical analysis by an > environmental consulting firm, Adolfson and > Associates on the habitat issues raised as they > relate to the Endangered Species Act. > The City's regulations permit clearing of trees in > sensitive areas and requires replacement of these > trees based on a sliding scale in TMC 18.54130. > These regulations only apply in sensitive areas, in > this case the shoreline. The remaining trees are > not regulated and can be removed without a permit. > The Parks Dept. had a professional arborist examine > the windrow to determine their health and condition. > The arborist's report indicates that the majority > of the windrow trees are in poor to fair condition > and recommends that all be removed due to the > potential for "catastrophic failure in the future." > You are welcome to come down and review the > arborists report on the trees as well as the > Adolfson analysis. Please call if you have any > questions - 206 -431 -3661. > Thanks > Carol Lumb > »> Don Scanlon <donscan(a donscan.orq> 12/04/02 > 12:16PM »> > Hi, > I would like to make known my objection to removing > the large Redwood tree's as part of the Foster Golf > Course renovation. Large trees such as these are an > invaluable resource for wildlife. Of all the things > we > can do for wildlife preserving large trees is the Carol Lumb - Re: Foster Golf course Re > most > important because it takes so long to replace them. > As a member of the Tukwila Wildlife Habitat > committee > I thought Tukwila was going to become a leader in > preserving wildlife habitat when we became certified > as a wildlife community. I would hate to see Tukwila > go back to a policy of removing habitat when it gets > in the way. Habitat has to be a top priority. I > would > gladly help in developing an alternative plan that > would preserve this habitat. > ATTACHMENT part 2 application /msword > ATTACHMENT part 3 application /msword [Cara Lumb - Foster Golf Course Trees 0 Page 1r 1 I) . From: Carol Lumb To: Interneta-gkerr@microsoft.com Date: 12/9/02 1 :08PM Subject: Foster Golf Course Trees Hi Georgina: Here are the staff reports we talked about and the SEPA memo that Steve prepared after evaluating the comments that came in on the SEPA determination and the professional analysis prepared by Adolfson & Associates on the comments. Let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 206 -431 -3661. Thanks Carol !Jack Pace - Re: Foster Golf course Red d Trees __.___..._..._...ge 1 t From: Carol Lumb To: Don Scanlon Date: 12/9/02 3:56PM Subject: Re: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Hi Don: thanks very much for your comments on the trees at the Foster Golf Course. I am attaching a copy of the memorandum that Steve Lancaster prepared after reviewing both the comments received on the SEPA determination and a technical analysis by an environmental consulting firm, Adolfson and Associates on the habitat issues raised as they relate to the Endangered Species Act. The City's regulations permit clearing of trees in sensitive areas and requires replacement of these trees based on a sliding scale in TMC 18.54130. These regulations only apply in sensitive areas, in this case the shoreline. The remaining trees are not regulated and can be removed without a permit. The Parks Dept. had a professional arborist examine the windrow to determine their health and condition. The arborist's report indicates that the majority of the windrow trees are in poor to fair condition and recommends that all be removed due to the potential for "catastrophic failure in the future." You are welcome to come down and review the arborists report on the trees as well as the Adolfson analysis. Please call if you have any questions - 206 - 431 -3661. Thanks Carol Lumb »> Don Scanlon <donscanadonscan.orq> 12/04/02 12:16PM »> Hi, I would like to make known my objection to removing the large Redwood tree's as part of the Foster Golf Course renovation. Large trees such as these are an invaluable resource for wildlife. Of all the things we can do for wildlife preserving large trees is the most important because it takes so long to replace them. As a member of the Tukwila Wildlife Habitat committee I thought Tukwila was going to become a leader in preserving wildlife habitat when we became certified as a wildlife community. I would hate to see Tukwila go back to a policy of removing habitat when it gets in the way. Habitat has to be a top priority. I would gladly help in developing an alternative plan that would preserve this habitat. 1 Jack Pace - Trees at Foster Golf Course __ ?age 1.1 From: Carol Lumb To: Internet :pelfolios @worldnet.att.net Date: 12/9/02 4:05PM Subject: Trees at Foster Golf Course Hi Chris and Michelle: Under separate cover, you were sent a copy of the staff report for the design review application for the Foster Golf Course Clubhouse. I am attaching to this e-mail the memorandum sent by the Director of the Department , Steve Lancaster, to the SEPA file on his reconsideration of the SEPA determination of the clubhouse. Mr. Lancaster prepared the memorandum after reviewing both the comments received on the SEPA determination and a technical analysis by an environmental consulting firm, Adolfson and Associates on the habitat issues raised as they relate to the Endangered Species Act. The City's regulations permit clearing of trees in sensitive areas and requires replacement of these trees based on a sliding scale in TMC 18.54130. These regulations only apply in sensitive areas, in this case the shoreline. The remaining trees are not regulated and can be removed without a permit. The Parks Dept. had a professional arborist examine the windrow to determine their health and condition. The arborists report indicates that the majority of the windrow trees are in poor to fair condition and recommends that all be remove due to the potential for "catastrophic failure in the future." You are welcome to come down and review the arborists report on the trees as well as the Adolfson analysis. If you have any questions or want to arrange to see the files, please call me at 206 -431 -3661. Carol Lumb Senior Planner clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us CITY OF TUKWILA INTER - OFFICE MEMO TO: City Council n/ FROM: Steve Lancaster SUBJECT: Proposed tree removal at Foster Golf Course DATE: December 9, 2002 The Tukwila Parks Department has proposed that ten coastal redwood, two blue spruce and two paper birch trees be removed in conjunction with construction of a new clubhouse and associated redevelopment at Foster Golf Course. The original proposal also involved removal of a large Port Orford cedar tree located adjacent to the Foster Memorial Tree (big leaf maple). It is my understanding that Parks now proposes to modify its plans in order to preserve the Port Orford cedar. The Foster Memorial Tree will be retained and Parks has obtained the recommendations of a certified arborist concerning its protection and maintenance. Approximately thirty trees will be planted as mitigation for the trees removed. The proposal will be reviewed by Tukwila's Board of Architectural Review (BAR) on Thursday, December 12, 2002. The BAR is responsible for deciding whether the proposal is consistent with Tukwila's design review regulations, and to approve, reject or modify the proposed development on this basis. The BAR's design review decisions may be appealed to the City Council. If the BAR decision is appealed, the normal cautions concerning "appearance of fairness" will apply. Please note that while the Parks Department is the applicant for this project, DCD's function is to administer the City's environmental and land use regulations, and support the BAR in its regulatory function. The Parks Department's stated reasons for proposing removal of the redwood, spruce and birch trees can be summarized as follows: 1. Parks has obtained an assessment from an ISA Certified Arborist, who has recommended that the spruce and redwood trees be removed for safety reasons. Copies of this assessment are available from DCD. 2. Parks has obtained a parking study that recommends a minimum of 287 parking spaces be provided to support the facility. The project architect has strongly advised Parks that failure to provide adequate parking can be a serious impediment to the project's success. \ \TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\ STEVE\ STEVE\ DEVEL \FosterGCWindrow021209b.doc Page 3. Retention of the trees would result in the loss of approximately 47 parking spaces, according to Parks. Replacement of these spaces would encroach upon the golf course, which is already considerably under -sized at 67 acres and 4804 yards (18 -hole golf courses are typically 120 -plus acres and 6200 -6400 yards long). Based upon concerns raised during the project review period, the Department of Community Development requested that a qualified scientist be retained to evaluate the impact of the proposal on habitat values, especially those associated with federally listed species (specifically listed salmonids and the marbeled murrelet). Adolfson Associates of Seattle was retained to perform an assessment. After reviewing the concerns raised and the scientific information available to me, I concluded that removal of the trees as proposed would not result in a significant habitat impact. My evaluation of the habitat issue is attached to this memo. Adolfson's full report is available from DCD. The Department of Community Development is recommending that the BAR approve the project, including the proposed tree removal and replacement plan. Our reasoning is as follows: 1. Only four of the trees proposed for removal enjoy regulatory protection under Tukwila's tree ordinance (two redwoods and both spruces). The tree ordinance allows tree removal if adequately mitigated. The proposal includes tree replanting in excess of the mitigation requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code. 2. Removal of the trees as proposed will not significantly affect wildlife habitat, including the habitat of federally listed species. Proposed tree replacement will likely provide improved habitat values over the long term. 3. Removal of the trees will have a noticeable aesthetic impact on the site and surroundings. In our opinion this impact does not outweigh the safety concerns raised by the arborist's report. Over time, the aesthetic impacts will be lessened as newly planted trees mature. It is possible that the BAR will disagree with this last point concerning aesthetics, and could decide that some or all of the trees should be retained to achieve consistency with Tukwila's adopted design criteria. Please contact me at 431 -3681 if you have questions regarding any of the above. Cc: Lucy Lauterbach Carol Lumb \ \TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\ STEVE\ STEVE\ DEVEL \FosterGCWindrow021209b.doc Page : CITY OF TUKWILA INTER - OFFICE MEMO TO: Case File E02 -020 FROM: Steve Lancaster SUBJECT: SEPA Threshold Determination for Foster Golf Clubhouse DATE: December 6, 2002 BACKGROUND On November 20, 2002 I issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance for the referenced project. This MDNS was circulated for information and comment pursuant to WAC 197- 11- 340(2)(b). The comment period for the MDNS expired on December 4, 2002. WAC 197- 11- 340(2)(f) requires reconsideration of this MDNS based on timely comments. COMMENTS RECEIVED During the comment period I have received and reviewed the following communications (copies attached): 1. 11 -21 -02 E -mail from Ryan Partee, Tukwila Department of Public Works 2. 11 -25 -02 E -mail from Ryan Partee, Tukwila Department of Public Works 3. 11 -27 -02 E -mail from Tom Pulford, Tukwila Department of Public Works 4. 12 -03 -02 E -mail from Ryan Partee, Tukwila Department of Public Works 5. 12 -04 -02 E -mail from Emelie McNett 6. 12 -04 -02 E -mail from Don Scanlon 7. 12 -04 -02 E -mail from Chris Mitchell and Michele Roedell 8. 12 -04 -02 Letter from Karen Walter, Muckelshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Each of these communications provide information and/or opinions related to the proposed removal of trees in the vicinity of the George Eddy house in the northeastern portion of the project site. E -mails number 1, 2 and 4 express concern about the potential impact of tree removal on wildlife habitat, including that of federally listed salmonids and the marbled murrelet, also federally listed as "threatened." Communications number 5 through 7 express similar concerns. Communication number 8 expresses concern that the project proposal has "the potential to cause adverse impacts to salmonid habitat with inadequate mitigation." It suggests that the existing trees are "more likely to recruit into the Green River sooner than the [proposed] replacement \ \TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\ STEVE\ STEVE\ DEVEL\FosterGCWindrow021205.doc Page • • trees" and recommends that the project be modified to require wood to be placed in the Green River as mitigation. EVALUATION Based upon these comments I requested that the applicant retain a qualified independent consultant to review habitat concerns, particularly as they relate to federally listed species, and report their findings. The applicant retained Adolfson Associates of Seattle, Washington. This office received their report on December 6, 2002 (copy attached). The report consists of a letter from Adolfson Senior Scientist Benn Burke to Tukwila Assistant Parks and Recreation Director Rick Still, dated December 6, 2002, with attachments. Attachments include a Salmonid Technical Memo and a Marbled Murrelet Technical Memo, both dated December 6, 2002. In summary of his analysis and findings, Mr. Burke offers the following opinions (paraphrased): • Removal of the subject trees would not result in the unmitigated loss of unique habitat types or diversity within the City. • It is not reasonable to assume that marbled murrelets would utilize the subject trees, or any other tree, at the golf course as nesting habitat. These trees do not meet the habitat preferences of nesting marbled murrelets. • Removal of the subject trees would not result in an unmitigated loss of forage opportunities for juvenile salmonids. • The subject trees are not tall enough nor near enough the river to contribute woody debris naturally. It is unlikely the subject trees are healthy enough to grow to a height where they might eventually contribute woody debris. Proposed replacement trees have a higher chance of providing large woody debris in the long term due to their closer proximity to the river. • The proposed action will not result in a permanent loss of riparian forest and will not result in the loss of trees that one could expect to grow and recruit into the river. • The proposed action will not result in unmitigated adverse impacts to federally listed fish species. CONCLUSION Upon reconsideration of MDNS E02 -020 based upon comments received and the Adolfson Associates analysis, I have concluded that the MDNS shall be retained. Steve Lancaster, SEPA Responsible Official \ \TUK2 \VOL3\HOME \STEVE\ STEVE \DEVEL \FosterGC W indrow021205.doc Page : 1L/ 17b/ L1717L 11 : 4 b /1:I bti4 F-1LULI 5UN 1-7-1tJt F71/ 104 ■ A D O L P S O N • • December 6, 2002 Environmenrai So(aaons Rick Still Assistant Director Parks and Recreation. Department 12424 42nd Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 RE: Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project, Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Still: Adolfson Associates, Inc. (Adolfson) is pleased to provide a review and response to seven comments from two sources received regarding the Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (MDNS) issued by the City for Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project. Our investigation included a site visit on December 5, 2002 and a review of literature regarding potential fish and wildlife use in the vicinity of the Foster Golf Links. The results of the literature review are provided in the comment responses below and in the attached technical memoranda. A site visit was conducted on December 4, 2002 to observe habitat and evaluate the site - specific conditions. The proposed parking lot expansion occurs partly within the 200 - foot shoreline zone of the Green River. It is our understanding that fifteen trees are proposed for removal in order to facilitate the expansion of the parking area for the Foster Golf Links clubhouse. This includes the removal of a row of coastal redwoods: The proposed parking area is located on a piece of land between the Green River and Interurban Avenue, in Tukwila, Washington. The land is currently developed, with a house, parking garage, and paved driveway. The paved driveway extends to the top of bank of the Green River, east of the house. The Green River shoreline in this area is vegetated with big leaf maple, black cottonwood, Pacific willow, Douglas fir, western red cedar, Himalayan blackberry, and reed canarygrass. A small, unpaved area remains immediately adjacent to the house, and is planted with a big leaf maple. bearing a plaque stating that it was planted in 1873, as well as two blue spruce trees. In addition, eleven coastal redwoods were planted in a row behind the house. The row of redwoods is located between approximately 90 and 300 feet from the Green River shoreline. The redwoods range in diameter at breast height (dbh) from 28 inches to one individual of 40 inches dbh. These trees are bordered on both sides by developed areas. Immediately to the east, within the drip -line of the trees, is an existing paved parking area and beyond that a sidewalk which abuts Interurban Avenue, a busy, four -lane arterial. Interurban Avenue is developed with residences, housing developments, and commercial businesses. Project Understanding It is our understanding that the City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department is proposing to upgrade the existing club house and parking area at the Foster Golf Links. ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 5309 Shilahole Avenue NW, Sulte 200 Scant, WA 98107 77C 206 789 9658 yaK 206 789 9684 adacicr,gadoyron(om 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project December 6, 2002 Page 2 of 6 PAGE 02/19 The proposed upgrades include, in part, the removal of approximately 15 trees to facilitate the expansion of the parkin.g area. Some of this work occurs within 200 feet of the top of bank of the Green/Duwamish River. Included in these trees are a row of 10 coastal redwoods (Sequoia sempervirons) (Photo 1), a single redwood surrounded by parking lot and maintained lawn (Photo 2), two paper birch (Betula papyrifera), and two • Colorado blue spruce. Coastal redwoods are a tree species native to the coast range of California and the extreme southwest corner of Oregon (Preston, 1978). Colorado blue spruce are native to the southern Rocky Mountain states. Neither Colorado blue spruce nor redwood are identified as native to the Puget Sound Trough ecoregion (Pojar and MacKinnon, 1994). Paper birch is native to Washington. All of the trees proposed to be removed were planted as landscaping; none are naturally occurring. Comment Responses. The following responses are numbered to correspond to numbers assigned to the comments provided to us by the City (attached). 1. The commenter's assertion that these trees provide a pleasant and individualized character that is worth preserving reflects their personal opinion. Although certainly valid in that context, the commenter also implies that these trees represent a unique or unusual habitat type and that impacts to this unique and unusual habitat type were not adequately addressed within the context of the MDNS. It is my opinion that individual trees, or even small groups of trees planted as landscape amenities, do not compose a "habitat type" as generally described in the literature. The habitat type "Redwood Forest" is described by Franklin and Dyrness (1988) and includes forest dominated by redwoods in climax or late succession stages of growth that occur in limited coastal areas of California and southwestern Oregon. In this context, redwood forests include stands or groups of redwood trees within a wider assemblage of other tree and understory species native to that region and that supports a unique assemblage of plants and animals. In the context of the Foster Golf Links site, the "habitat type" would be characterized as "urban" as described by Ferguson et al. (2001) in Johnson and O'Neil (2001). The urban habitat type is not unique in Tukwila and this habitat type is of relatively low importance to fish or wildlife compared to any native assemblage including old growth or mature second growth forest with native understory. It is my opinion that the rem.oval of these trees would not result in the unmitigated loss of unique habitat types or diversity within the City. 2. Marbled murrelet is a species of bird listed as threatened under the Federal Endangered Species Act. As described in the attached technical memoranda, marbled murrelets occur in the Puget Sound region and are known to utilize habitat types within 50 miles (or more) of marine areas where they forage. The commenter is correct that native stands of redwood trees are important habitat types for marbled murrelet. These birds do rely heavily on native redwood stand where both trees and birds occur naturally. Redwood trees grow to a size and have a branch configuration that reflects the habitat preference of nesting marbled murrelet (see enclosed technical memoranda). That point established, it is my opinion that the commenter has 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project December 6, 2002 Page3of6 ADOLFSON PAGE 03/19 misinterpreted their source of information and has inferred that marbled murrelets would be somehow drawn to the individual redwood trees at the Foster, Golf Links. Marbled murrelets are fish eaters that forage in marine waters. Aside from providing nesting habitat, redwoods do not provide a food source or other unique attribute that would draw them to these individual trees. Marbled murrelet that occur in Washington State readily utilize other native species of trees that also grow in such a way that they provide similarly preferred nesting habitat. As described in the attached technical memoranda, marbled murrelet in Washington State nest in stands of native old growth or mature second growth forest typically removed from urban areas. Based in information presented in the scientific literature it is my opinion that it is not reasonable to assume, as the commenter states, that marbled murrelets would utilize these trees, or any other tree, at the golf course as nesting habitat. 3. The commenter is correct in their statement that munelets are know to fly inland for substantial distances to utilize suitable nesting habitat as described above. They are also correct that location of these trees in relation to the marine habitat in Puget Sound has no bearing on the conclusion that the proposed action will not adversely affect marbled murrelets. What does have significant bearing, however, is that these trees do not meet the habitat preferences of nesting marbled murrelets, as described in the response to Comment 2. 4. Overhanging riparian vegetation has been shown in the literature to provide a significant source of food to fish in some riverine systems as a result of insect drop. A growing body of literature also supports the presumption that insects can be important forage items in lower river systems, estuaries, and even marine environments. However, it is unlikely that the loss of these trees would result in a measurable decrease in forage for juvenile salmonids in the lower GreenlDuwamish River, as these trees do not overhang the river. Insects dropping from these trees would fall on ground, far removed from the river. Insects could be blown from these tees into the river during periods of excessively high winds, but under these circumstances insects would also be blown into the river from many other trees in the vicinity, including those planted as replacements. It is my opinion.that the removal of these trees would not result in a unmitigated loss of forage opportunities for juvenile salmonids in the lower Green/ Duwamish River. 5. Only five of the 15 trees to be removed occur within 200 feet of the river (see attached photos). None of the trees occur directly adjacent to the top of bank of the river. None of the trees to be removed are currently tall enough to fall and land directly in the river. I do not know if the commenter was aware of the condition of the health of the trees when writing these comments on the MDNS. It is my understanding that, based on review of the trees by a qualified arborist, it is unlikely any of the 15 trees would be healthy enough to grow to a height where they would be tall enough to fall into the river. It is likely that they would be removed as hazards to pubic safety before they could obtain their full potential height (which could take several hundred years for the redwoods). In the event that any of these trees were to 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON 111 111 Foster Golf inks Clubhouse Project December 6, 2002 Page 4of6 PAGE 04/19 fall naturally, in the near future they would likely fall onto paved surfaces of the house. The likely scenario then, is that they would be cut up and removed for public safety long before they would ever have the chance to be washed into the river. Although the replacement trees are not the equal in size to those removed, they are to be planted along the river. It is my opinion that they would have a higher chance of providing large woody debris to the stream in the long term by simple nature of their proximity to the river, compared to the trees to be removed around the parlcing area. 6. Native riparian forest containing western red cedar, even as immature trees, that is located along the lower Green /Duwamish River are relatively. These forests do provide important ecological function as identified by the commentor. The site plan misidentified the trees to be removed as cedar (implying western redcedar [Thuja plicata]), a tree native to most lowland forests in the Puget Sound Region. The trees to be removed are coastal redwoods and Colorado blue spruce that were planted as landscape amenities, and are not part of any native riparian forest complex (see photo). The reviewer is apparently unfamiliar, with the actual site and the description within the MDNS appears to have been somewhat misleading as to imply that these trees might occur as part of a natural riparian forest assemblage. As a point of clarification, riparian forest is not being coverted to parking lot as part of the proposed action. Existing parking area is being expanded into an area that is currently developed as road, lawn, landscape area, and building site as shown in the attached photographs. The proposed action will not result in a permanent loss of riparian forest and will not result in the loss of trees that "one could expect to grow and recruit into the Green River" as described in the response to Continent 5. 7. Comment noted. If the proposed action involved siting of a totally new facility in an area currently dominated by riparian forest and not simply the expansion of an existing facility into areas already disturbed by development, I would agree that there would be more appropriate places to have a locate a parking lot. However, the existing land uses (home, road, lawn, parking lot) were established prior to our current understanding of ecological principles and the importance of shoreline areas related to salmon. production. In addition, the mitigation proposed.to compensate for the loss of this disturbed habitat provides for planting trees with more actual recruitment potential than the trees proposed for removal. The commenter's opinion is completely understandable in that context, but given that the MDNS reflects the potential impacts to the environment as it exists today (the environmental baseline), and not as it could exist at some unknown future time under differing circumstances, it is my opinion that, the proposed action will not result in unmitigated adverse impacts to listed fish species in the lower Green/Duwamish River, as described by SEPA_ Limitations Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope -of -work, we warrant that this evaluation was conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science . 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON • • Fosrer Golf Links Clubhouse Project December 6. 2002 Page 5of6 PAGE 06/19 practices, including the technical guidelines and criteria in effect at the time this study was performed. The results and conclusions of this report represent the authors' best professional judgment, based upon information provided by the project proponent in addition to that obtained during the course of this study. No other warranty, expressed or. implied, is made. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this material for you. If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 789 -9658. Sincerely, ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Benn Burke �y- Senior Scientist 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON . . Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project December 6, 2002 Page 6 of 6 References Ferguson, H.L., K. Robinette, and K. Stenburg. Chapter 12 Wildlife of Urban Habitats. In Johnson, D.H. and T.A. O'Neil. 2001. Wildlife- Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press. Corvallis, Oregon. Johnson, D.H. and T.A. O'Neil. 2001. Wildlife - Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press. Corvallis, Oregon. Preston, Richard. 1978. North American Trees. The Mit Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.. PAGE 05/19 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 IJL.1)/1•'W ADOLFSON PAGE 08/19 P.3 AV NVI8C1631N 1 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON PAGE 09/19 Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project Photo 1. Existing parking area, facing north towards`proposedexpansion and row of redwoods (adjacent to Interurban Avenue in this picture). Photo 2. Proposed parking area expansion, row of redwoods to the right of the picture, top of bank of Green River to the left just beyond the edge of pavement. Page 1 • 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 II/ ADOLFSON PAGE 10/19 • Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project Photo 3. Location of proposed parking area expansion, facing south; blue spruCe to the left to be removed, big leaf maple in the fore-ground to be preserved, and row of redwoods to the right to be removed. Photo 4. Location of proposed parking area expansion, facing north; showing same blue spruce, big leaf maple, and row of redwoods as above photograph. Page 2 . 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 • ADOLFSON PAGE 11/19 • Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project Photo 5. East edge of proposed parking expansion, facing Green River shoreline. Lower parking area not part of expansion plans. Page 3 . 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON PAGE 12/19 • • MEMORANDUM DATE: December 6, 2002 TO: Rick Still FROM: Benn Burke CC: i WE A D O L F S O N Erwiron-lwnrat So4Xons RE: Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project - Salmonid Technical Memo A review of current scientific literature was conducted to summarize information on the expected level of use and habitat requirements of federally - listed salmonids in the project vicinity. A listing of pertinent references is provided at the end of this report. Occurrence of Federally - listed Salmonids in the Project Vicinity Puget Sound Chinook Salmon Chinook salmon in the vicinity of the Foster Golf Links golf course are included in the Puget Sound Chinook ESU; a population listed as threatened by the NMFS on March 24, 1999. Chinook salmon are anadromous. Adults spawn in freshwater streams in the late summer and fall. Fry emerge in the winter and spring. Juvenile chinook may rear in freshwater from three months to two years (NMFS 1998). The outmigration of juvenile chinook occurs year- round. Warner and Fritz (1995) found juvenile chinook year -round in the lower Duwamish /Green River system with a distinctive population peak in mid - May. The 1992 Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory (SASSI) report (1994) states that chinook generally migrate to salt water in the summer and fall, with some fish overwintering in fresh water and outmigrating in the spring. Regardless of outmigration timing, Puget Sound chinook spend from two to four years rearing in Puget Sound and /or the North Pacific before returning to spawn. Adult chinook salrnon return to the Duwamish/Green River system from April through September (SASSI, 1994). Chinook salmon die after spawning. Chinook require varied habitats during different phases of their life. Chinook typically spawn in the mainstem of larger rivers and tributaries. Spawning habitat typically consists of riffles and the tailouts of pools with clean substrates dominated by large cobbles. Juvenile chinook rear in the lower mainstem of rivers before entering the estuary. This is a period of intense growth; Shepard (1981) reports individual juvenile chinook may grow from one percent to two percent a day in these environments. Individual juvenile chinook may spend, on average, two to six days rearing in the estuary; however, the year -round outmigration of juveniles results in a generally constant recruitment to lower -river and estuarine habitats over the entire year (Stober et al. in Shepard, 1981). After rearing, Puget Sound chinook move to pelagic habitats. Some fish forage entirely within Puget Sound and nearshore waters while others range into the North Pacific (NMFS, 1998). ADOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Tel 206 789 9658 www.adolfwi.com Fax 206 789 9684 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON PAGE 13/19 • • Adollson Memorandum Page 2 In Tukwila, chinook are present within the mainstem of the Duwamish /Green River during their outmigration as juveniles and during their return migration as adults. Chinook salmon stocks in the Duwamish /Green River have been identified as "healthy" based on escapement levels (SASSI 1994). The 1992 SASSI report stated that there has been an increasing trend in natural spawning escapement levels as indicated by redd counts; however, the report concludes that some of these increases may be attributed to naturally spawned fish of hatchery origin. This includes fish of hatchery origin that do not return to the hatchery as adults, instead spawning naturally in streams. Bull Trout Coastal bull trout was listed by the USFWS as threatened in November 1, 1999. The historical distribution of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) extended from northern California to Alaska. In Washington, bull trout are found throughout coastal and inland streams and lakes (WDFW 1991). Bull trout and Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) are not, in fact, "trout," but are char. Both Bull trout and Dolly Varden are similar species, and have been considered to interbreed or be the same species. Separate inventories for each species have not been performed due to two major factors: considerable biological similarities exist between the species and methodologies to reliably separate them where they coexist have only recently been developed and have not been widely applied; and strong similarities exist with respect to life history, habitat, and hatchery and fisheries management (WDFW 1998). Bull trout have a very complex life history. There are two life history forms in bull trout: a resident form and a migratory form. Individuals of the migratory form may be stream dwelling (fluvial), lake - dwelling (adfluvial), or ocean - or esturine - dwelling (anadromous) (USFWS 1998). Individuals of each form may be represented in a single population; however, migratory populations may dominate where migration corridors and subadult rearing habitats are in good condition (USFWS 1998). Most coastal bull trout are anadromous. Anadromous fish migrate to the ocean in the spring and return in the late summer and early fall (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). Bull trout are opportunistic feeders, consuming fish in the water column and insects on the bottom (WDW 1991). Stream temperatures and substrate conditions are important for bull trout. Bull trout are most commonly associated with pristine or only slightly disturbed basins (USFWS 1998). Bull trout spawn from August through November in streams with clean gravel substrates and cold (less than 9 degrees C) water temperatures. Redds are dug by females in water eight to 24 inches deep, in substrate gravels 0.2 to two inches in diameter (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). Buli trout are not known to occur as residents in the Duwamish /Green River system. There have been reports of native char in the basin; however, extensive surveys in the upper watershed above Howard Hanson Dam have not identified a resident population in this relatively undisturbed watershed (WDFW 1998). Wamer and Fritz (1995) reported the capture of one bull trout adult in the lower estuary downstream of the City during their seine surveys in the Duwamish /Green River estuary and confirmed the identification of the fish by genetic testing. It is not known whether this individual fish was an anadromous or fluvial fish from the Duwamish /Green system or an opportunist from another basin feeding on outmigrating fish in the lower river (Wamer and Fritz 1995). Given that other contemporary fish surveys throughout the Duwamish /Green River system have not produced a single confirmed bull trout (WDFW 1998), it appears that bull trout use, or potential use, in the Duwamish/Green River within the City of Tukwila is not significant, although the occasional fish may stray into the lower estuary. . 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON i 4 Adolfson Memorandum Page 3 No bull trout have been identified in any of the tributary streams within the City of Tukwila and, given habitat conditions, future bull trout use is not likely PAGE 14/19 Available Fisheries Habitat in the lower Duwamish /Green River The Foster Golf Links golf course is located within 200 feet of the Duwamish/Green River, a large river system draining a major watershed, often referred to as Water Resources Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9). The Duwamish /Green River flows generally north through the City of Tukwila from approximately River Mile (RM) 5 to RM 17. Prior to the 1920's, the Duwamish River drained a much larger watershed including all flows from the present Green River watershed (WRIA 9), the Lake Washington drainage basin (WRIA 8), and the White River (now part of WRIA 10). Both natural and man -made modifications during the early 1900's reduced the drainage basin to its present configuration. Flows from the White River were diverted to the Puyallup River by a flood in 1906 and flows from Lake Washington were diverted west to Lake Union and Salmon Bay after the construction of the Ballard Locks and Lake Washington Ship Canal in 1916. Currently the Duwamish/Green River drains about one quarter of its original extent (Warner and Fritz, 1995). Historically, the lower Duwamish /Green River including the entire reach within the City, consisted of rapidly shifting meanders (Wamer and Fritz, 1995). Presently, the Duwamish/Green River within the City is completely constrained by dikes. Diking during the early part of the 1900's and the construction of Howard Hanson Dam in 1961 on the Green River near Palmer, Washington have reduced flooding and erosion and limit the river to its present channel. Extensive water regime and channel modifications have resulted in current habitat conditions that were not historically present in the Duwamish /Green River system. A large estuarine wetland that included the lower reach of the river is no longer present. The northern -most portion of the Duwamish /Green River is maintained as a navigation channel, which is dredged to allow access upstream to the Turning Basin. Most of the oxbows, side channels, sloughs, and associated wetlands historically present in reaches flowing through the City have been filled or otherwise isolated from the Duwamish /Green River channel. The Duwamish/Green River adjacent to the Foster Golf Links golf course serves as a salmonid transportation and rearing area (Williams et al., 1975). Williams et al. (1975) state that the lower Duwamish /Green River is "vital to salmon as a transition area for adaptation of migrants to salinity changes." The northernmost portion of the present -day Duwamish/Green River system is still generally a brackish estuarine environment, although dredging has created deepwater habitats where none previously existed (Warner and Fritz, 1995). Tidal influences are observed upstream to about the mouth of the Black River. The mouth of the Black River marks the upstream extent of the Duwamish River portion of the Duwamish/Green River system. The channelization of the river has resulted in a modification of the natural mixing action of the estuary, resulting in a distinct salt wedge and simplified mixing zone (Dawson and Tilley 1972 in Warner and Fritz, 1995). Substrates within the lower Duwamish/Green River are dominated by consolidated and unconsolidated mud and sand (Warner and Fritz, 1995). Compacted gravel is the dominant substrate above the tidal influence (Williams et al., 1975). Most of the area within the shoreline zone of the Duwamish /Green River within the City is either developed or brown -field being 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON Adolfson Memorandum Page 4 PAGE 15/19 redeveloped.• Water dependent uses generally occur below RM 8 (Williams et al. 1975). Small areas of sparse tree and shrub cover line the bank, but shading potential is limited. Vegetation growing along the dikes provides some overhanging cover, but habitat complexity is low and habitat elements such as large woody debris and off . channel areas are generally absent_ Summary Although the occasional fish may stray into the lower estuary, bull trout use, or potential use, in the Duwamish/Green River within the City is not likely to be significant. Chinook use within the vicinity and site is well documented. The Duwamish/Green River adjacent to the Foster Golf Links golf course serves as a transportation and rearing area for chinook salmon during their outmigration as juveniles and during their return migration as adults. References Myers, J.M., R.G. Kope, G.J. Bryant, D. Teel, L.J. Lierheimer, T.C. Wainwright, W.S. Grand, F.W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S.T. Lindley, and R.S. Waples. 1998. Status Review of Chinook Salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS - NWFSC -35. Washington Department of Fisheries (NDF), Washington Department of Wildlife (WDW), and Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes. 1994. 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory. Olympia, Washington. Williams, R.W., R.M. Laramie, and J.J. James. 1975. A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization: Volume 1, Puget Sound Region. Washington State Department of Fisheries. Olympia, Washington. 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 • MEMORANDUM DATE: December 6, 2002 TO: Rick Still FROM: Benn Burke CC: ADOLFSON • ifl Mal A O O I. F 3 O N PAGE 16/19 Ewiro, .nenra SoKILIo% -S RE: Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project - Marbled Murrelet Technical Memo A review of current scientific literature was conducted to summarize information on the expected level of use and habitat requirements of marbled murrelets in the project vicinity. A listing of pertinent references and personal communications is provided at the end of this report. Marbled Murrelet Occurrence in the Project Vicinity Marbled murrelets are currently federally - listed as threatened in Washington State. Marbled murrelets occur from the Aleutian Islands of Alaska to central California (Federal Register Volume 61, Number 102, May 24, 1996). In Washington, marbled murrelets are year -round residents on coastal waters,'and have been observed foraging in Puget Sound waters (Wahl and Speich, 1984; Speich et al., 1995). Marbled murrelets typically forage for small fish and crustaceans in marine waters within 1.2 miles of the shore (Ehrlich el al., 1988; WDW, 1991; USFWS, 1996). Nesting habitat is not present in the project area (see below). Marbled murrelet potential use of the Foster Golf Links golf course area is expected to be limited only to occasional transient use when they may fly over the area between their foraging grounds in marine waters and their inland nests. Nesting Habitat Requirements In nesting requirements, marbled murrelets are dependant upon old- growth forests, or forests with an older tree component (USACOE, 2002). Sites occupied by murrelets tend to have a higher proportion of mature forest classes than do unoccupied sites (Raphael et al., 1995). These forests are characterized by multi - layered canopies and a high composition of low - elevation conifer trees, and typically occur on the lower two thirds of forested slopes, up to 52 miles from marine environments (Hamer and Nelson, 1995). Preferred Nest Trees Marbled murrelets nest and roost in mature and old growth forest areas of western Washington (WDW, 1991), and they tend to nest in the same forest stand in successive years ( USFWS, 1997). Critical Habitat for marbled murrelets was designated by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1996. For nesting habitat to be accessible to marbled murrelets, it must occur close enough to the marine environment "WOLFSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 - Tel 206 789 9658 www.addlfson.com Fax 206 789 9684 ._ 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 • AdoNson Memorandum Page 2 ADOLFSON • PAGE 17/19 for murrelets to fly back and forth. In the Puget Sound area there is little nesting habitat available near marine environments, with stands meeting the habitat preferred by murrelets occurring between 10 and 40 miles inland (Hamer, 1995). The farthest inland distance for a known occupied site is 84 kilometers (52 miles) in Washington. The available literature considers the following attributes to be common traits of nest trees preferred by marbled murrelets: Tree Structure. Individual tree attributes that provide conditions suitable for nesting include large branches (average of 32 centimeters (13 inches), range of 10 to 81 centimeters (4 to 32 inches) in Washington, Oregon, and California) or forked branches, deformities (e.g., broken tops), dwarf mistletoe infections, witches' brooms, or other structures large enough to provide a platform for a nesting adult murrelet (Hamer and Nelson, 1995). These structures are typically found in old- growth and mature forests, but may be found in a variety of forest types including younger forests containing remnant large trees. Because marbled murrelets do not build nests, moss or detritus may be important to cushion or hold the egg. Platforms should have overhead cover for protection from predators and weather, which may be provided by overhanging branches, limbs above the nest area, or branches from neighboring trees. Canopy cover directly over the nests was typically found to be high (average 84 percent; range 5 to 100 percent) (Hamer and Nelson, 1995). Such canopy cover may be provided by trees adjacent to the nest tree, and/or by the nest tree itself. Northwestern forests and trees typically require 200 to 250 years to attain the attributes necessary to support marbled murrelet nesting, although characteristics of nesting habitat sometimes develop in younger coastal redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) forests. Tree Species. The marbled murrelet population in Washington, Oregon, and California nests in most of the major types of coniferous forests in the western portions of these states, wherever older forests remain inland of the coast. Based on current information from Washington, Oregon, and California, nests have been found in Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), coastal redwood, western hemlock, western redcedar (Thuja plicate), or Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) (Hamer and Nelson, 1995). No records were found of marbled murrelet using coastal redwoods for nesting in Washington. Stand Size In addition to studies of edge effects, some research has been initiated to look at the importance of stand size. Among all Pacific Northwest birds, the marbled murrelet is considered to be one of the most sensitive to forest fragmentation (Hansen and Urban 1992). Murrelet nest stand size in Washington, Oregon, and California vaned between 3 and 1,100 hectares (7 and 2,717 acres) and averaged 206 hectares (509 acres) (Hamer and Nelson, 1995). Nelson and Hamer, (1995) found that successful murrelets tended to nest in larger stands than did unsuccessful murrelets, and Schieck et al. (1995) found that murrelet presence and abundance was positively correlated with old- growth stand size in British Columbia; however, neither sets of data were statistically significant. 12/06/2002 11:27 2067899684 ADOLFSON PAGE 18/19 Adolfson Memorandum Page 3 General Landscape Condition In addition to stand size, general landscape condition may influence the degree to which marbled murrelets nest in an area. In Washington, marbled murrelet detections increased when old- growth/ mature forests comprised more than 30 percent of the landscape (Hamer and Cummins, 1990). Hamer and Cummins (1990) found that detections of marbled murrelets decreased in Washington when the percentage of clear - cut/meadow in the landscape increased above 25 percent. Additionally, Raphael et al. (1995) found that the percentage of old -growth forest and large sawtimber was significantly greater within 0.8- kilometer (0.5 -mile) of sites (203- hectare (501 -acre) circles) that were occupied by murrelets than at sites where they were not detected. Raphael et al. (1995) suggested tentative guidelines based on this analysis indicate that sites with 35 percent old- growth and large sawtimber in the landscape are more likely to be occupied. In California, Miller and Ralph (1995) found that the density of old- growth cover and the presence of coastal redwood were the strongest predictors of murrelet presence. Summary The nearest potential occurrence of marbled murrelets is in the marine waters of Elliott Bay or Puget Sound, more than 5 miles from the project. Marbled murrelets may fly over the project between nest and marine foraging areas. Coastal redwoods are utilized as nesting trees for marbled murrelet, however, this is only in California or southern Oregon where these trees are native. Although several of the on -site redwoods have a dbh of 32 inches, with one tree exhibiting a dbh measured at 40 inches (per drawings provided by the City), however, they did not exhibit suitable branch structure, and do not provide shelter from adjacent disturbance. Instead, they are located in a row immediately adjacent to a busy four -lane arterial (Interurban Way) and overlook a residential home. Moss, mistletoe, and lichen was not observed on the trees; however, this is unconfirmed as observations were only made from the ground. Murrelets tend to avoid areas of continual disturbance and commonly nest and roost in mature and old growth forest areas averaging 509 acres in size. References Federal Register: May 24, 1996 (Volume 61, Number 102) 1L/ VO/ LPJOL 11:47 L00 /077OO4 DEC 05 '02 11:24AM TUI A DCD/PW HLULr 7LJN • MUCICGESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE Fisheries Department 39015 -172nd Avenue SE • Auburn, Washington 98092-9763 Phone: (253) 939 -3311• • Fax (253) 931 -0752 December 4, 2002 Steve Lancaster Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenrer Boulevard • ZLkwila, WA 98188 U4/ U4 P.2 /3 RE: Foster Golf Course MDNS E02 -020 Dear Ma. Lancaster; The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Department has reviewed the Mitigated Determination of Non - SignifiC,ance (MDNS) for the proposed modifications to the' Foster Golf Course, located along the Green River. This project is within the Tribe's Usual and Accustomed Fishing Area. We are sending these comments in the interest of protecting and restoring the Tribe's treaty protected resources. The proposed modifications to the existing golf carcase include, but are not limited to, expansion of the pig lot, increasing the current stormwater system, and removing trees along the Green River. As proposed in the MDNS, these three activities have the potentia] to cause adverse impacts to salmonid habitat Withiriadequete Mitigation. For example, the SEPA review notes that 32 replacement trees will be -- required for the removal of cedar trees that are 50+ years in age along the Green River. While the size of replacement trees are not specified in the MDNS, it is unlikely that they will, be equivalent in height and/or diameter to 50+ year-old trees. The trees to be removed are older, therefore, they are more hicely to recruit into the Green River sooner than the replacement trees. Therefore, the protect shoiild.be modified by requiring wood to be place into the Green River of sufficient size and nuunber.•to mitigate for the loss of, large cedar tree removal. The amount of wood needed depends on the temporal extent of tho,project impacts. These impacts depend in part on how many trees are removed for what aspects of the project to discern shorter and long term impacts. For example, some trees may be removed due to a reconfiguration C9 of a golf green and could be revegetated, whereas the parking lot will cause a pen ile:lent loss, of riparian vegetation and is in an area that one couldexpect trees to grow and recruit into the:Green River. The parking lot, as noted above, is within the riparian zone of the Green River where trees could recruit to the River. The portion of the parking lot that is in this zone should be relocated and revegetated to allow for trees to grow and recruit into the River in the future. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact me . at (253) 939 -3311, extension 116. IL/CIO/GCMG 11:4 b ! 077b04 UUULP UN ratut 173 /174 DEC 05 '02 11; SAI1 TU DCD/PW ; 1 WED 18:09 FAX 253 9 P,3/3 752 MucIIesuooT Pip WOOS Muddeshoot Indian Ta'be Fisheries Dapertinert Comments to Foster Golf Course MDNS E02.¢0 • Sincerely, Karen Walter Senior Watershed Coordinator Cc: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner, City of Tukwila Larry Fisher, WDFW, Region 4 , December 4, 2002 Page 2. e Carol Lumb•- Foster Golf course Redwc rees ry From: Don Scanlon <donscan @donscan.org> To: <tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/4/02 12:17PM Subject: Foster Golf course Redwood Trees Hi, I would like to make known my objection to removing the large Redwood tree's as part of the Foster Golf Course renovation. Large trees such as these are an invaluable resource for wildlife. Of all the things we can do for wildlife preserving large trees is the most important because it takes so long to replace them. As a member of the Tukwila Wildlife Habitat committee I thought Tukwila was going to become a leader in preserving wildlife habitat when we became certified as a wildlife community. I would hate to see Tukwila go back to a policy of removing habitat when it gets in the way. Habitat has to be a top priority. I would gladly help in developing an alternative plan that would preserve this habitat. CC: <slancaster @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Carol Lumb Foster Trees �_ - T �^ __ Pagel From: "Chris Mitchell" <pelfolios @worldnet.att.net> To: <tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/4/02 1:37PM Subject: Foster Trees December 4, 2002 Tukwila Planning TO THOSE_ CONCERNED We would like provide input on the issue of cutting down large, old trees on the Foster Golf Course. We trust that the city will scrutinize this issue closely; we hope that you will decide not to cut down the trees. Tukwila is fast loosing large portions of it's wooded areas and other wildlife habitat to development and factors such as the Citrus Longhorned Beetle. Tukwila was recently recognized as the first National Wildlife Habitat Community in Washington state. We would hate to see the city make such a short- sighted decision as to cut down these trees which provide significant habitat. Old, large trees such as these cannot be easily replaced. Simply planting other trees does not replace the habitat that is lost when an old tree is destroyed. Sincerely, Chris Mitchell.and Michelle Roedell 13425 43rd Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 206 - 244 -00376 pelfolios @worldnet.att.net CC: <slancaster @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Carol Lumb - Redwood trees at Foster r Links From: Emelie McNett <EmelieMontgomery@netscape.net> To: <tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 12/4/02 7:31 AM Subject: Redwood trees at Foster Golf Links I understand the City of Tukwila is planning to cut some very large trees at the Foster Golf Links. While I am not a resident of Tukwila (I live in Burien), I was an active member in Tukwila's Backyard Wildlife Habitat Committee and learned a great deal about the importance of large trees to the urban environment. They absorb pollutants, mitigate storm water runoff, cool an area when it's hot, keep an area warm, when it's cold, provide possible nesting sites for threatened /endangered high - nesting birds (eagles, marbled murrelets, osprey, heron), and take decades if not centuries to replace. I urge you to reconsider your decision about this action. A reply would be appreciated. Sincerely, Emelie McNett 206 -478 -9598 Burien Backyard Wildlife Habitat Project The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! http: // channels. netscape .com /ns /browsers /download.jsp Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http: / /webmail.netscape.com/ CC: <stancaster @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Pa •e Carol Lumb - Foster Golf Trees Page 1 From: Ryan Partee To: Jim Morrow Date: 12/3/02 3:48PM Subject: Foster Golf Trees Jim, I have read through Brian Gilles reports concerning the Trees at Foster Golf. Here are my comments on his documents as well as some editorial comments. While Mr. Gilles reports are well done, I would be curious in hearing his suggestions as to what could be done to conserve and rehabilitate these trees.(i.e. asphalt removal, soils rehabilitation, mychorrhizal fungal and tree based fertilizer soil injection). The reports center on defining the trees current status and recommending them for removal. I am of the opinion that we have a unique chance to preserve and help these trees recover. The port orford cedar and the Foster Memorial Tree...... In the reports produced by Mr. Gilles, he states that each of these trees is in good health. Given the size and age of each, I would expect each of these trees to outlive the design life of the new clubhouse (50+ years). I would like to point out that both the Foster Memorial Tree (Big Leaf Maple, Acer macrophyllum) and the port orford cedar Chamaecyparis lawsoniana, are well established, mature trees. While I would agree that there is some root competition between these trees, this is a long- standing competition, which does not appear to be fundamentally detrimental to either tree. Root competition is natural and expected, but is not immediately life threatening to either tree in my opinion. What is of greater concern for the welfare of both these trees is the surrounding asphalt and compacted soils. Part of this root competition between these trees is caused simply by their proximity to each other. However, the main reason for this is that the cedar does not have suitable soils to the west, and therefore concentrates its rooting efforts to the east where it inevitably must compete with the maple. If the asphalt to the west of the cedar tree was removed and the soils re- worked as in the case of the gravel driveway removal, both trees would benefit. This would allow both trees to continue to coexist since each would be afforded the opportunity for a greater root zone area from which to draw resources. This of course would also apply to the other. parking lot trees slated for removal.. I disagree with his recommendation to remove the port orford cedar. Parking lot access road around the Foster Memorial Tree... The layout for the new paved access road around the foster memorial tree does not conform to City of Tukwila Code.18.44.130.B.1: "B. River environment uses shall conform to the following standards: 1. Access roads, parking or storage areas, the closest edge of which shall be a minimum of 40 feet from the mean high water mark;" The new access road encroaches into this 40 -foot management zone as well as the dripline of the Foster Memorial Tree (attachement). Reconstruction of the existing road would further serve to compact the soil surrounding the tree and most likely have a detrimental impact on what roots have penetrated under this Caro Lumb - Foster Gol rees area. This certainly could effect its longevity. Tree removal in general... What appears to be the limiting factor on all of the trees discussed in Mr. Gilles reports is the previously allowed parking lot construction (pavement), site development and former tree maintenance practices. I am truly amazed that the mature trees within the existing parking area are doing as well as they are given these growing conditions and their previous treatment. As a Biologist I have a strong objection to the removal of the redwoods and cedar located in the north end of the existing parking lot. That stand of trees is unique within the lower Duwamish Estuary and provides a distinct diversity in coniferous species that is not found anywhere else along the river corridor within Tukwila. The redwoods and the port orford cedar, provide a specific habitat type and their proximity to the river makes them rather important to local and migratory species, including Federally listed salmonids (chinook salmon and bull trout). These trees may also benefit another Federally listed species, the marbled murrelet Brachyramphus marmoratus. Marbled murrelets are known to use redwood trees (and other mature coniferous trees) for nesting. Since they have a presence within greater Puget Sound, one would be able to reasonably presume that the potential for nesting behavior by this bird could occur at the golf course.. Certainly, since they are drawn to this habitat type, I would suspect that there might be at least an occasional presence much in the same way that there is an occasional bull trout occurrence in the lower Duwamish. The issue of the distance of the trees from the river where this threatened species concerned is moot. The proximity of these redwoods to the river has little bearing for murrelets as they will fly over 40 miles (sometimes much more) from their feeding areas to utilize trees like these. Although the likely hood that murrelets would utilize these trees in any fasion is slim, the potential does exist. In addition to this, the trees provide insect food source for juvenile salmonids as well as habitat for other local species despite the fact that most of the trees are over 200 ft from the OHWM. Perhaps what is most puzzling about this project is that for whatever the reason, (political, economical, sight line from Interurban) I have seen no attempt to design the site improvements to accommodate the parking lot trees proposed for removal. It is true that most all of the trees are outside the 200 -foot shoreline management area and as such, have little in the way of regulations to protect them. It is also true that there is no City regulation that would stop the trees from being cut down. The tree cutting is left to the discretion of the developer, which in this case is us. From what I understand, Tukwila was the 4th City in the United States to obtain an accredited Backyard Wildlife Habitat Certification. This certification was received in May of 2002 and was acknowledged by U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell who sent along her congratulations saying. "By receiving this distinctive honor, the City of Tukwila has become a leader in our region by creating a model for protecting wildlife right in our own backyards. Tukwila has shown that developing a community habitat is something all local residents can work toward with a sense of accomplishment and pride. Protecting the environment has always been one my top priorities. I applaud the Tukwila Wildlife Habitat Project and residents of Tukwila for partnering with the National Wildlife Federation to make environmental protection one of your priorities." Pam Linder is also a member of the Backyard Wildlife Habitat Program and has been a supporter of that project from its start in 1999. Taking down these trees without examining the options for their preservation is simply negligent and irresponsible. We owe it to our citizens to do whatever is necessary to conserve these trees. From a Page 2 Public and Community Relations stand point, it is not proper that a City project on City land not work to preserve and protect trees that not only have important habitat value, but also important historical value on the boundary line of the Foster Homestead. I would like to see an alternative parking plan developed that preserves these trees as well as some of the other mature on site trees. In addition, I believe that these trees are an asset to the site and provide a pleasant, individualized historical character that is worth preserving. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do regarding this matter. Thanks, Ryan Senator Cantwell quote from: http://www.nwtorq/backvardwildlifehabitat/tukwilaCertified.cfm CC: Carol Lumb; Steve Lancaster 40 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 27, 2002 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department has filed a design review application to construct a 14,600 square foot clubhouse with associated parking for 286 vehicles. The proposed clubhouse includes a 200 seat restaurant and lounge, a pro shop and 2,000 square foot meeting room. The project is located on a portion of a 60 -acre site developed as an 18 -hole golf course at 13500 Interurban Avenue South. The existing golf course clubhouse, constructed in 1946, along with some outbuildings will be demolished. You are invited to comment on the project at the public hearing scheduled for Thursday, December 12, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. before the Tukwila Planning Commission. The hearing will take place at Tukwila City Hall in the City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. To confirm the time and date of the hearing, please call the Department of. Community Development at 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Other known required permits include: • Land Altering and Grading • Special Permission Parking • Shoreline Substantial Development Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available for review at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development, located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Please call 431-3670 to make sure the files will be available. Application filed: Notice of Completeness Issued: Notice of Application Issued: c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course \pubheamot.doc August 16, 2002 September 23, 2002 October 9, 2002 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Carol Lumb - Foster Tree From: Tom Pulford To: Lumb, Carol Date: 11/27/02 2 :23PM Subject: Foster Tree Thanks for info on the tree assessment. Very thorough and in keeping with a good arborist. sorry to see the redwoods to go. most will out last the new clubhouse given its forty year life. would be good to have replacement for character and wildlife cover but difficult to maintain in golf setting(maintenance) and parking lot due to room for large trees. Perhaps it maybe more appropriate to plant a mitigating grove close to the river to act as habitat for animal vs a habitat for cars. I still am a little concerned that the tree removal issues, site layout and the amount of grading are not shown together. You may have better documentation than I have had the opportunity to review. The arborist may not be aware of the amount of grading and drainage changes through that Foster Tree area. The arborist may not visualize that the new double lane road appears to be within the drip line :of the Foster Tree. He may need to address if and if so how this additional paving and root compaction can be mitigated as well as to address the long term maintenance to encourage viability. An accurate depiction of the drip line on the grading and site layout plan would be a good start. I am delighted to read that the Foster Tree is in a good condition as he indicates, this is spite of having a previous tree topping and years of a gravel road at its base. 1 believe he is a little conservative on the replacement value and perhaps he is not aware of the "cloud on the land title" that if were are to cause the untimely death of this tree, the .93 acre knoll reverts to the heirs. From: To: Pulford Date: Subject: Ryan Partee Bruce Fletcher, Carol Lumb; Jill Mosqueda; Jim Morrow; Steve Lancaster; Torn 11/25/02 10:48AM Foster Golf Redwoods Hi, In doing some research to follow up on a few questions asked by Steve, I have some additional infomation concerning the golf course redwood trees. I would like to point out that marbled murrelets Brachyramphus marmoratus another Federally listed species (Threatened, Federal ESA in 1992) uses redwood trees for nesting. Since they have a presence within greater Puget Sound, one would be able to reasonable presume that the potential for nesting behavior by this bird could occur at the golf course. Certainly, since they are drawn to this habitat type, I would expect at least an occasional seasonal presence much in the same way that there is an occasional bull trout occurance in the lower Duwamish. The issue of the distance of the trees from the river where this threatened species concerned is moot. The proximity of these redwoods to the river has little bearing on murrelets use as they will fly over 40 miles (sometimes much more) from their feeding areas to utilize trees like these. In addition to this, the trees provide insect food source for juvenile salmonids as well as habitat for other local species as I mentioned previously. I've attached a photo below as well as a few web pages for your review. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ryan http://www.nos.qov/mora/ncrd/murrelet.htm http://www.spruceroots.orq/Murrelet.html http:// www. cws- scf. ec.gc.ca /hww- fap /hww- fap.cfm ?ID species= 2781anq =e 1 L/ U / LCICJL 11:47 LGb / 07bt4 DEC 03 '02 05 :26PM TUK 1A DCD'PW 0 law 11/21/02 Comment: 04LULP UN I'Alat U4/124 • P.2 I have a strong objection to the removal of the redwoods located in the northern area where the new parking is proposed. That stand of trees is unique within the lower Duwamish Estuary and provides a diversity in large species that is not found anywhere else in this area. The redwoods provide a specific habitat type and their proximity to the river makes them rather important to local and migratory species, inchsding Federally listed salrnoni,ds. I would like to see an alternative parking plan developed that preserves these trees' as well as some of the other mature on site trees. In addition, I believe that these trees are an asset to the site and provide a pleasant, individualized character that is worth preserving. :.. 11/25/02 Comment: In doing some research....,1 have some additional information concerning the golf course redwood trees. I would like to point out that marbled murrelets Brachyrampluts marmoratus another Federally listed species (Threatened, Federal ESA in 1992) uses redwood trees for nesting. Since they have a presence within greater Puget Sound, one would be able to reasonably presume that the potential for nesting behavior by this bird could occur at the golf course. Certainly, since they are drawn to this habitat type, I would expect at least an occasional seasonal presence much in the same way that there is an occasional bull trout occurance in the lower Duwamish. The issue of the distance of the trees from the river where this threatened species concerned is moot. The proximity of these redwoods to the river has little bearing on murrelets use as they will fly over 40 miles (sometimes much more) from their feeding areas to utilize trees like these. In addition to this, the trees provide insect food source for juvenile salmonids as well. as habitat for other local species as I mentioned previously. I Carol Lumb - Trees and Vegetation at ter Golf From: Ryan Partee To: Steves @bergerpartnership.com Date: 11/21/02 3:27PM Subject: Trees and Vegetation at Foster Golf Steve, Here is the list of plant species suitable for the areas needing replanting at the Foster Golf Course. Mock Orange Philadelphus lewisii Red ozier dogwood corpus stolinifera Kinnikinnik Arctostaphylos uva -ursi Nootka rose Rosa nutkana Red flowering currant Ribes sanuineum Oregon grape Mahonia aquaifolium Oceanspray Holodiscus discolor Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus Black hawthorn Crataegus douglasii Red alder Alnus rubra Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata Indian plum Oemlaria cerasiformas Thimbleberry Rubus parviforus Snowberry Symphoricarpus albus Western hemlock Tsuga heterophyla Bigleaf maple Acer macrophylum Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis Sala! Gaultheria shallon Cascara Rhamnus purshiana Coast strawberry Fragaria chiloensis Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia Serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia Sitka mountain. ash Sorbus sitchensis In another matter... I have a strong objection to the removal of the redwoods located in the northern area where the new parking is proposed. That stand of trees is unique with in the lower Duwamish Estuary and provides a diversity in large species that is not found anywhere else in this area. The redwoods provide a specific habitat type and their proximity to the river makes them rather important to local and migratory species, including Federally listed salmonids. I would like to see an alternative parking plan developed that preserves these trees as well as some of the other mature on site trees. In addition, I believe that these trees are an asset to the site and provide a pleasant, individualized character that is worth preserving. I imagine that the matter of these trees will need further discussion at a formal meeting. Thanks, Ryan CC: Bruce Fletcher; Carol Lumb; Gary Schulz; Jill Mosqueda; - Jim Morrow; Rick Still; Steve Lancaster, Tom Pulford Page 11 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, rao, &jos HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: 6b2 02.0 Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: ((lad/ 6/74 Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ -- FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 f1 Other v/ ( 0) /� l �� i i 5Alelid 7 e o of Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this ' day of n,/ in the year 20p2 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: ,� /tjd g02 a21 f -fl.S�� 6o /}f /Mg /44 406tt Project Number: 6b2 02.0 I Mailer's Signature: � at 6,1/14a , Person requesting mailing: ((lad/ 6/74 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM City of Tukwila • Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (MDNS) File Number: [02 -020 Applied: 08/16/2002 Issue Date: 11/20/2002 Status: ISSUED Proponent: TUKWILA DEPT. OF PARKS AND RECREATION Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: SEPA FOR NEW 14,600 SQ. FT. CLUBHOUSE FOR FOSTER GOLF COURSE, A 200 SEAT RESTAURANT, 286 -CAR PARKING LOT, 2,000 SQ. FT. MEETING ROOM, ALTERATION OF GOLF COURSE TEES & GREENS NEAR ALTERED STRUCTURES AND DEMOLITION OF EXISTING CLUB HOUSE AND ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS. Location of Proposal: Address: 13500 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW Parcel Number: 0003000049 Section/Township/Range: 04 -14 -23 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The conditions for this SEPA Determination are amended at the end of this document. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). The conditions are attached. Comments must be submitted by (2 — 0 Z . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. For a copy of the appeal procedures, contact the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 ll- 2o- dZ Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) SEPA Determination Conditions: 1: Excavations into historically native soil, when in an area of archaeological potential, shall have a professional archaeologist on site to ensure that all State statutes regarding archaeological conservation /preservation are implemented. The applicant shall provide a written commitment to stop work immediately upon discovery of archaeological doc: Miscperm E02 -020 Printed: 11 -20 -2002 City of �ukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 remains and to consult with the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation to assess the remains and develop appropriate treatment measures, which mayh include refilling the excavation. 2: A certified arborist must identify measures to protect the Foster Maple Tree, both during construction as well as after completion of the project. 3: The historic characteristics of the George Eddy house, Windrow and existing clubhouse must be documented by a professional historian prior to demolition of the structures and removal of the trees. 4: Green River Trail users must be notified when construction activities will disrupt Trail usage along Interurban Avenue South. Notification shall include posting the Trail at least one week prior to any closure or rerouting of the trail and notifying user groups buy mail at least one week in advance. doc: Miscperm E02 -020 Printed: 11 -20 -2002 • Gilles Cesuiting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5- 8 2 2 - 4 9 9 4 November 20, 2002 Rick Still, Assistant Director Tukwila Parks and Recreation 12424 42nd Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 SUBJECT: EVALUATION OF LARGE PORT ORFORD CEDAR TREE AT FOSTER GOLF LINKS Dear Mr. Still: As you requested, while at the Foster Golf Links site on November 1, 2002, I also evaluated the large Port Orford Cedar tree that is just to the southwest of the Foster Memorial Tree. Specifically you asked me to evaluate the tree for health and structure and to inform you if its condition warranted retention during your upcoming expansion/development project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The tree is in good health and vigor. There is included bark between the trunks from the ground up four feet. This potentially weak structure can cause failure during severe adverse weather events. If left alone, the tree could survive for several more decades. The tree has a 60 to 65% chance of long term survival of the construction is limited to the current boundaries of the existing parking lot and access road. An additional factor to consider, however, is that, while the Port Orford cedar is healthy, it is competing with the Foster Memorial tree for resources such as water, nutrients, sunlight, and canopy space. Removal of the cedar will improve the long -term health of the Foster Memorial tree, as long as the tree protection measures that are delineated in my previous report, dated November 14, 2002, are followed to protect the Foster Memorial Tree from damage. METHODOLOGY: To evaluate the tree and to prepare the report, I drew upon my 20+ years of experience in the field and my formal education in Natural Resources Management, Dendrology, Forest Ecology, Plant Identification, and Plant Physiology. I also followed the protocol of the P r . I'7 I e tl Fax: 425-822-6314 E— mail:'bkgilles @aol.com 12823 NE 107th Place Kirkland, WA 98033 • • International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for Hazard Tree Assessment while looking at the overall health of the tree and the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, the surrounding land and the soil, as well as a complete look at the trees themselves. In examining the tree, I looked at such factors as: size, vigor, crown ratio and class, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging limbs. While no one can predict with absolute certainty which trees will or will not fail, we can, by using this scientific process, assess which trees are most likely to fail and take appropriate action to minimize injury and damage. The tree was tagged and numbered tree #2. The tag is made of shiny aluminum, approximately 1 inch by 3 inches in size, and is attached to the tree with a short galvanized nail. The use of galvanized nails was to minimize rusting and streaking. Short nails were used so that they would not penetrate through the bark into the vascular cambium and potentially introduce pathogens. The tag was placed as high as possible to minimize its removal. The tag was placed on the backside of the tree as inconspicuously as possible so as to not draw attention. GENERAL SITE NOTES: The tree is located between Interurban Avenue South and the Green River in the Foster Golf Linksin a small patch of lawn with two other trees and some shrubs. The lawn area is just north of the existing house, which is scheduled for demolition. The lawn area is bordered on the west by an existing parking lot that is slightly higher in elevation than the lawn itself. There is an access road the curves around the lawn area to the north and east. The Foster Memorial Tree is located just 38 feet away. There is a small shrub hedge between the Cedar tree and the parking lot that is four feet to the west. OBSERVATIONS: • The tree is a Port Orford Cedar, Chamaecyparis lawsoniana that is forked at four feet above the ground. The trunk diameters, measured the standard 4.5 feet above the ground are 10.5, 25.7, and 22.3 inches in diameter. ■ The canopy: o The shape of the canopy is generally symmetrical in shape and weight distribution around the trunks. o The foliage is dense for the species indicating a high level of vigor. o The live canopy is approximately 95% of the entire tree height indicating good health and vigor. o The crown, the top 10 to 15% of the canopy, is healthy and strong. This also indicates a high level of health and vigor. Evaluation of Port Orford Cedar Foster Golf Links November 14, 2002 Page 2 of 5 • • • The trunks are typical for the species: o As noted above, the trunk forks at four feet above the ground. • There is some included bark between two of the trunks that could indicate an internal structural weakness. o The trunks are straight above the fork. o There is a wound on the 25.7 -inch trunk with a rot pocket. • The rot appears to be well compartmentalized and does not appear to extend into the rest of the tree. • With the use of binoculars, I observed the main trunks and major branches. No insect infestations or woodpecker activity was observed. • The tree appears to have adequate solid wood to support itself at this time and has the potential to survive one or more decades into the future. o The root collar has no apparent defects, no apparent fungal or bacterial infections, and no observable insect infestations. o The parking lot was installed within five feet of the base of the tree. However, the tree appears to have adjusted to the loss of root zone and has recovered well. GENERAL HEALTH CONCLUSIONS: The tree is in good health and structure considering its age and the installation of the parking lot and access road. The tree has potentially many decades of life left and is worthy of extra effort to maintain during expansion of the parking lots and other improvements planned for the golf course. However, as noted earlier, while the Port Orford cedar is healthy, it is competing with the Foster Memorial tree for resources such as water, nutrients, sunlight, and canopy space. Removal of the cedar will improve the long -term health of the Foster Memorial tree, as long as the tree protection measures that are delineated in my previous report, dated November 14, 2002, are followed to protect the Foster Memorial Tree from damage. WAIVER OF LIABILITY: There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. As conditions change is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long -term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required Evaluation of Port Orford Cedar Foster Golf Links November 14, 2002 Page 3 of 5 permits from the city, county, stated, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs. I hope this report answers your questions. Please call me if I can provide more information or be of further service. Sincerely, Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist — PN -0260 Evaluation of Port Orford Cedar Foster Golf Links November 14, 2002 Page 4 of 5 REFERENCES CONSULTED: 1. Harris, Richard W. et al, Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1999. 2. Mattheck, Claus Prof. and Ass. Jur Mrs. Helge Breloer, The Body Language of Trees, A Handbook for Failure Analysis, HMSO, London, England. 1994. 3. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Evaluation of Hazard Trees, Second Edition, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1994 4. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Trees & Development, A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1998. 5. Scharpf, Robert F. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers, USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 521, revised June 1993 6. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., A New Tree Biology, Facts, Photos, and Philosophies on Trees and Their Problems and Proper Care. Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, New Hampshire. 1993. 7. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., Modern Arboriculture, A Systems Approach to the Care of Trees and Their Associates, Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, NH. 1991. 8. Watson, Dr. Gary W., & Dr. Dan Neely Editors, Trees & Building Sites, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, IL. 1995. Evaluation of Port Orford Cedar Foster Golf Links November 14, 2002 Page 5 of 5 0 0 MEMORANDUM November 19, 2002 To: Steve Lancaster, Director Fm: Carol Lumb, SenioYPlanner Re: Project File No. E02 -020: Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Project Description: Construct a 14,600 square foot clubhouse, demolish an existing three -story clubhouse and associated buildings, alteration of golf course tees and greens near the new structure and new 286 car parking lot. The proposed clubhouse includes a 200 seat restaurant and lounge and two one thousand square foot meetings rooms. Proponent: City of Tukwila Department of Parks and Recreation Location: 13500 Interurban Avenue South Date prepared: November 19, 2002 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Comments on Document: Two comments were received. One person commented on the impact of construction on use of the Green River Trail that runs along Interurban Avenue South. A response to these comments is found under "Recreation." A second person objected to the removal of the Windrow trees. A response to this comment is found under "Plants." Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology SEPA Review — E02 -020 C) Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance, Mitigated (MDNS) Existing Environmental Information: 0 • Technical Information Report, prepared by Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. (July 25, 2002) • Clubhouse Feasibility Study, prepared by David A. Clark Architects, (June 25, 2001) • Proposed Foster Golf Course Clubhouse Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment, prepared by Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited (July 19, 2002) Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth The soils at the proposed clubhouse site are silty sands. The site is developed as a golf course, which has slight variations in topography. The steepest slope on the site is 37 % on an adjacent course. Approximately 8,000 cubic feet of fill and 1,600 of cut are planned as part of the construction activity. The building pad and surrounding area will be filled to raise the elevation to 20 feet in order to be above the 100 -year flood plain. The entire golf course site is 60.6 acres; the clubhouse and parking lot comprise a small portion of the overall site and will cover approximately 6% with impervious surface. Standard erosion control measures will be used during construction: silt fencing will be located along the downhill perimeter of the disturbed areas; silt protection will be placed on all existing and poposed catch basins; rock construction entrance will be installed; and a sediment pond to retain runoff will be created. Air Normal emissions and dust associated with use of construction equipment will occur during construction of the project. After construction, odors from the restaurant cooking exhaust and normal exhaust associated with vehicular traffic will occur. Water trucks will be used as needed during construction to keep the dust down. All equipment will meet local, state, and federal emission standards. This site is affected at times by odors from the rendering plant to the east. 2 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course\sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -020 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 Water 0 The Green River abuts the site on three sides of the overall project site, although the construction of the clubhouse is not within the shoreline environment. The project is subject to the State Shoreline Management Act since landscaping, portions of the driveway and parking areas, and the enlargement of the retention/bioswale will be within 200 feet of the shoreline. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water, nor will there be any surface water or ground water withdrawals or diversions. The project site lies within the 100 -year floodplain. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters will occur. The existing storm water collection system will be revised to handle the new clubhouse and parking areas. An existing retention bioswale that is within the Low Impact Environment of the shoreline will be enlarged to handle the runoff from the enlarged parking lot and clubhouse and off -site city shops. The retention bioswale has a flapgate that prevents pond waters from going back into the storm drain system and a second flapgate between the pond's outlet and the river to prevent backwater flows from the river into the pond. The applicant has noted that the only added impact to water related to this project will come from the larger size of the parking lot and the larger building footprint size. The runoff from the city shops is an existing connection that is not being altered by this project. The detention pond is being enlarged to handle the larger on -site footprint. At the request of the Public Works department, the pond is being enlarged to handle the off site water from the shops that was previously not addressed when the original connection was made. No fuel storage area is included in the golf course project, and the applicant is not altering any method of storing, handling or use of fertilizers. The entire list of fertilizers used at the site has been approved by the City Public Works Department's Biologist for use on all areas of the course, including the areas adjacent to the river. However, this project will not house any fertilizers under any circumstances, even temporarily. The clubhouse will be connected to the City of Tukwila's sewage system. Plants The site is developed as a golf course, with manicured greens and varied vegetation. There is a windrow of cedar trees, some of which fall within the shoreline environment, that are proposed for removal. These trees are thought to have been planted in 1932 by George Eddy, at the time he constructed the house 3 c:\mydocs \Foster Golf Course \sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -0200 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 O that lies just to the east of the historic Foster Maple Tree. Those trees removed within the Low Impact shoreline environment must be replaced based on the City's Tree Ordinance (TMC 18.54). Based on the size of the trees to be removed, approximately 32 replacement trees will be required. Some of the replacement trees must be used to screen the revised parking area to the east of the historic tree, other of the replacement trees may be used to enhance the riverbank in the area adjacent to where the cedar trees are being removed. Landscaping will be provided at the front of the site, in the parking areas and around portions of the building as required by the City's Landscape Code, TMC 18.52. One comment was received by an adjacent resident in the single family neighborhood across the River objecting to the removal of the Cedar trees due to their aesthetic value and the danger of clearing and dirt movement near waterways. The City's Tree Ordinance, while encouraging retention of trees, does not prohibit their removal. As noted above, at least 32 replacement trees will be required. The historic Foster Maple Tree is located in the northwest portion of the site, adjacent to the river. This maple tree was planted by Joseph Foster, one of the original settlers in Tukwila, probably around 1873. A certified arborist has been hired to provide guidance on the protection of the tree, both during the construction activities as well as in the future after completion of the new clubhouse and supporting infrastructure. Information is not available yet as to the arborist's recommendations. A number of existing trees in the current parking lot will be removed to permit the regrading of the parking lot and relocation of the main entrance to the facility. The Technical Information Report notes that the existing paving of the driving and parking surfaces is in poor repair in part due to tree roots. There are no listed plant species in Tukwila that are threatened or endangered. The applicant notes that the trees were not considered to be retained so as to provide the most usable and accessible parking spaces close to the clubhouse. Removing these trees will reduce the amount of existing golf course and open space that must be converted to new parking space. Where reasonable tree digging is possible, the applicant states that trees located in the existing parking lot and those in the south parking lot expansion area will be dug and transplanted by Parks Department for use on other park sites. The demolition/construction period is outside the usual tree digging season so it is not feasible to transplant the trees for this project. Animals The SEPA Checklist notes that hawks and songbirds, have been observed on or near the site. The site is located along the Pacific Flyway migration route. The only mammals observed on the site are deer and rabbits. While the Checklist 4 c: \mydocs \Foster Gol f Course\sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -020 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 states that no fish have been observed, the National Marine Fisheries Service has recently listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon as a threatened species. This species is known to inhabit the Green River. The applicant provided the following information related to animals on the site: "The cedar trees currently may provide some nesting opportunities for wildlife, but are not close enough to the River to provide shade. While no eagles have been observed in the vicinity during field visits, the large cedars could potentially be used for perching. After removal of the trees it is unknown whether eagles would seek alternate perch locations in other tall trees located on the golf course. As the golf course is always planting and removing trees during its six year master plan alteration, it is unlikely, but unknown, that the removal of the planned trees on the fully treed 60 acre site will cause disruption to the flyway patterns. Replacement trees are being installed on the golf course and in the parking lot. "While coastal bull trout are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no data on file at the City of Tukwila was available that listed or identified confirming the presence of spawning or rearing bull trout within the Duwamish River. "Previous Environmental Impact statement on file at the City indicate the Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU) Chinook salmon are federally - listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Reproducing populations of Puget Sound ESU Chinook salmon exist in the Duwamish River, however, the development of the clubhouse and removal of the cedar trees is not expected to have an impact on the salmon population." Energy/Natural Resources Electricity and natural gas will be used in the building for heating, lighting and cooking facilities. Diesel fuel will be used in construction equipment during construction. The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. The building will be designed to meet the Washington State Energy Code to save energy in heating and cooling the structure. Environmental Health No special emergency services will be required as a result of the proposed project. Noise is generated by traffic along the street in front of the golf course. There are train tracks on the northeast property line. Construction noise will 5 c:Mydocs \Foster Golf Course \sepa -rpt SEPA Review= E02 -0200 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 0 occur during regular hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Noise from music from the restaurant and outdoor patio and the public address system for golfers, similar to existing levels, will occur once the clubhouse construction is completed and the building is open for business. Land/Shoreline Uses The area is the site of one of the original homesteads in Tukwila, settled by Joseph Foster. The site was developed as a golf course in 1925. Residential uses lie to the northeast and across Interurban Avenue South on the west. A Metro park and ride facility is also located across Interurban. City shops border the golf course on the south along with a Metro pump station. A small portion of the overall golf course site is zoned Commercial /Light Industrial (C/LI) with the remainder zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the site Commercial /Light Industrial and Low Density Residential. Half of the proposed clubhouse is located in the C/LI area with the remainder located in LDR. The Shoreline Master Program designation is Urban and the proposal must obtain a Shoreline Substantial Development permit. The project is subject to review by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review, which will review the design of the project, proposed landscaping etc. The front property line is unclear at this point; when the property line has been identified, front landscaping will be reflected on the landscaping plan. The existing clubhouse, maintenance office (former George Eddy house) and maintenance shed will be demolished. Approximately 19 -40 people will work on the site when the project is constructed. Housing No housing exists on the site. The former George Eddy house was used until recently as the maintenance office for the golf course. Aesthetics Wood siding and stone "type" veneer is proposed for the clubhouse building. The tallest portion of the structure is 40 feet, which falls within the C /LI zoned portion of the site. Golf course netting along the 18th fairway is visible from the multifamily housing on the west -side of Interurban Avenue South. The netting reaches 40 feet in height. The project is subject to design review and will be considered by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review. 6 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course\sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -020 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 Light/Glare The parking lot will be lit at night. The lighting in the parking lot will be directed so as to minimize any spillage off -site. There may be minimal glare from the glazing on building at certain times of the day. Recreation The site itself is developed as a golf course, with a clubhouse that includes a restaurant and lounge and a small pro -shop. The Green River Trail runs along Interurban Avenue South, the western property line of the site. Use of the trail may be disrupted during reconstruction of the parking lot. The trail will be posted prior to any construction that will disrupt or require relocation of the trail. Bicycle user groups will also be notified about any revisions to the trail. In addition, the applicant has noted the following: "The Drawings have the following note on the architectural site plans "Provide existing asphalt bike path & concrete sidewalk as required at new entrance. Contractor shall sign closure with warning signs approved by the City and shall restore smooth paved temporary paths within 48 hours of closure or as allowed by the City. Construct new entrance in strict accordance with City Standards. See civil drawings for more information. Historic /Cultural Preservation An Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment was prepared for this site. The study determined that there may be a possible hunter - fisher- gatherer or ethnographic period campsite located on the site and that there are two historic buildings that may be significant, the current Foster Golf Links Clubhouse and George Eddy house as well as a cultural feature that may be significant, the Windrow, located on the property as well. The study recommends that the possible hunter- fisher- gatherer or ethnographic period campsite be avoided and that a professional historian inventory and if necessary evaluate the existing clubhouse, George Eddy House and Windrow for significance prior to demolition. The site also contains the Foster Maple Tree, which was planted July 4, 1873. The project will be required to have a professional archeologist on -site during any ground disturbing activities both in the area of the hunter - fisher - gatherer or ethnographic period campsite as well as any other areas where construction might intersect with undisturbed native soils. In addition, a professional historian must inventory and if necessary, evaluate the existing clubhouse, George Eddy House and Windrow for significance prior to their demolition. 7 c:\mydocs \Foster Golf Course \sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -0200 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 Transportation O The site is served by Interurban Avenue South, which borders the property on the west. Interstate 5 and Interstate 405 are within one -half and one mile respectively of the site. The project proposes to relocate the current entrance to the site approximately 120 feet to the south and add a second entrance at the far south end of the site. The project will provide 286 parking stalls, an increase of 99 stalls over the existing 187 stalls. The site is served by transit and there is a park and ride lot across the street from the project. Public Services The construction of a larger clubhouse, with meeting space as well as enlarged restaurant and lounge will likely generate a slight increase in the need for public services such as police and fire. A fire lane will be constructed around the new clubhouse. Utilities Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. No additional utilities are anticipated to be needed as a result of the building construction. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance, Mitigated The following conditions apply to this project: 1. Excavations into historically native soil, when in an area of archaeological potential, shall have a professional archaeologist on site to ensure that all State statutes regarding archaeological conservation/preservation are implemented. The applicant shall provide a written commitment to stop work immediately upon discovery of archaeological remains and to consult with the State Office of.Archaeology and Historic Preservation to assess the remains and develop appropriate treatment measures, which may include refilling the excavation. 2. A certified arborist must identify measures to protect the Foster Maple Tree, both during construction as well as after completion of the project.. 8 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course\sepa -rpt SEPA Review — E02 -020 Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 19, 2002 0 3. The historic characteristics of the George Eddy house, Windrow and existing clubhouse must be documented by a professional historian prior to demolition of the structures and removal of the trees. 4. Green River Trail users must be notified when construction activities will disrupt Trail usage along Interurban Avenue South. Notification shall include posting the Trail at least one week prior to any closure or rerouting of the trail, and notifying user groups by mail at least one week in advance. 9 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course \sepa -rpt DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC November 18, 2002 Carol Lumb Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Proposed Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Dear Ms. Lumb, NOV 18 2002 COMMIJNflY DEVELOPMENT In response to your letter of November 12, 2002 regarding your SEPA, Design Review, Shoreline and Special Permission Parking application comments, please find the following responses. The numbering relates directly to your initial letter. E02 -020 SEPA 1. Regarding item #3.a.6. Please discuss handling of parking lot runoff, runoff from the shops, carts and other equipment and handling of fertilizers, application and, storage and how this may impact waters draining to the enlarged detention pond:;' Will there be fuel storage areas on- site? What measures are planned to handle any spills that may occur? The only added impact will come from the larger size of the parking.lot and the larger building footprint size. The runoff from the city shops is an existing connection that is not being altered by this project. The detention pond isbeing enlarged to handle the larger on -site footprint. At the request of the Public:,,. • Works department, `we are also enlarging the pond to handle the off site •wate from the shops that was previously not addressed We are not adding a fuel storage area to the golf course, and we are not altering any method of storing, handling or use of fertilizers. The entire list of fertilizers used at the site has been approved by the City Public Works Department's Biologist for use on all areas of the course, including the areas adjacent to the river. However, this project will not house any fertilizers under any circumstances, even temporarily. N:._ e • oo .d 0 z 0 0 z F z w A Washington Professional Limited Liability Company Licensed and Registered Architects in Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, and Washington November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 2 a 2. Item#4 /5: Plants and Animals: This project includes removal of several large cedar trees that are part of a Windrow planted possibly at the same time that the George Eddy home was constructed. The sequoia trees being removed within the 100' Low Impact Environment shoreline boundary provide many habitat benefits, including fishery benefits. Replacement with smaller trees does not totally mitigate the removal. If these trees are ultimately removed, this project will be required to provide riverbank habitat improvements as a mitigation measure along with replacement trees as required by TMC 18.54.130 3. One Cedar tree and two spruces are identified to be removed with in the 100' Low Impact Environmental Shoreline Boundary. Two Sequoias are identified to be removed in the 200' High Impact Environmental Shoreline Boundary. It is unlikely that any of these trees will provide shading for the river habitat. Also note that the Spruce trees are not native species of Western Washington, but introduced ornamentals. 3. Item #12. It appears that construction of the parking lot will temporarily affect the location of the Green River Trail along Interurban Avenue South. Please describe how Trail users will be accommodated during construction, specifically how the Trail users will be notified of construction activity that will disrupt use of the Trail and where the Trail will be re- routed. The Drawings have the following note on the architectural site plans "Provide existing asphalt bike path & concrete sidewalk as required at new entrance. Contractor shall sign ;; closure with warning signs approved by the City and shall restore smooth paved temporary paths within 48 hours of closure or as allowed by the City. Construct new entrance '`in strict accordance with City Standards. See civil drawings for more information." 4. Item 7. Environmental Health a.2., a spill response and pollution prevention plan wilbe`required for the construction activities. The contractor shall be required to submit for approval a spill response and pollution prevention plan at the pre - construction meeting with the City. We would ask'that,this requirement be deferred until that time. , 5. Item #13: Please provide an evaluation from a certified arborist on the impacts :to:the historical tree of the building demolition (George Eddy house), and any improvements to the inner driveway,that provides vehicle access to parking stalls on the west side of the site A detail on how: the historic tree will be protected during construction, reviewed and approved by the arborist, must be provided: The City has already engaged an independent arborist to assist the design team in protecting the Foster tree. His report and recommendations on this question will be addressed under.a separate letter. 6. The remainder of the Windrow of large sequoia trees is proposed for removal just outside the :IOW,: shoreline boundary. Did you consider a plan that would incorporate these trees into the landscape' plan? What is the impact to the overall parking for this project if the Windrow trees are retained? These trees were not considered to remain in the design process in an effort to provide the most usable and accessible parking spaces close to the clubhouse. Their removal will mitigate any further impact of parking on the Golf Course / Green Space and the Foster DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC -C� November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 3 0 Maple. Retaining these trees would require a loss of at least 36 parking spaces (4 compact and 32 standard). The following are comments or suggestions we would like to discuss: 7. Item #13: While not as old as the Foster Maple Tree, the Windrow of sequoia trees should also be included among the historical resources on the site, as they are thought to have been planted around the same time as when the George Eddy house was constructed. We have no knowledge of the Sequoia trees as historic resources. Their removal mitigates any further impact of parking on the Golf Course / Green Space and the Foster Maple. 8. As a point of information, the following responses should have been included in the SEPA Checklist: 4. Plants c. "No listed plant species in Tukwila." 5. Animals b. "Bald eagle, Chinook salmon, bull trout." 6. Animals c. Pacific flyway, migratory birds, Duwamish River anadromous salmon • Please let me know if you would like me to revise the SEPA Checklist • L02 -044: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application The following: information must be provided for review of the shoreline permit: 1. A flood control zone application is required along with the shoreline permit. A copy of this permit is': attached. This application must be completed and submitted before the Shoreline Substantial Development permit can be issued. Attached please find the Flood Control Application as requested. 2. Item 4: The shoreline application must discuss the habitat impacts to the shoreline environment of the removal of the cedar trees. One Cedar and one Blue Spruce are located with in 100' from the River edge,- and one Blue Spruce is located 70' from the River edge:. It is unlikely that these trees are capable of casting shadows or causing significant impact to the river habitat. 3. Item 5: Water that is discharged to the detention pond will be collected from a variety:of souices, including fertilized greens and areas where leakage from vehicles is possible (parking lots, 'WOO: What impacts will this have on the water that discharges to the Duwamish River? The only added impact will come from the larger size of the parking lot and the larger; building footprint size. The runoff from the city shops is an existing connection that is not being altered by this project. The detention pond is being enlarged to handle the larger:on site footprint. At the request of the Public Works department, we are also enlarging the pond to handle the off site water from the shops that was previously not addressed We are not adding a fuel storage area to the golf course, and we are not altering any method of storing, handling or use offertilizers. The entire list offertilizers used at the site has been approved by the City Public Works Department's Biologist for use on all areas of the course, DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 4 0 0 including the areas adjacent to the river. This project will not alter the method, amount or frequency of delivery of fertilizer. 4. Item 7: This area is along the Pacific Flyway and bald eagle, Chinook salmon and bull trout area listed protected species that are found in the vicinity. How will these habitats be impacted by the development and how will the habitat be protected? The cedar trees currently may provide some nesting opportunities for wildlife, but are not close enough to the River to provide shade'. While no eagles have been observed in the vicinity during field visits, the large cedars could potentially be used for perching. After removal of the trees it is unknown whether eagles would seek alternate perch locations in other tall trees located on the golf course. As the golf course is always planting and removing trees during its six year master plan alteration, it is unlikely, but unknown, that the removal of the planned trees on the fully treed 60 acre site will cause disruption to the flyway patterns. Replacement trees are being installed on the golf course and in the parking lot. While coastal bull trout are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no data on file at the City of Tukwila was available that listed or identified confirming the presence of spawning or rearing bull trout within the Duwamish River.' Previous Environmental Impact statement on file at the City indicate the Puget Sound Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU) Chinook salmon are federally - listed as threatened under. the Endangered Species Act. Reproducing populations of Puget Sound ESU Chinook:salmon exist in the Duwamish River', however, the development of the clubhouse and removaloftlze: cedar trees is not expected to have an impact on the salmon population. 5. The application is missing a narrative that addresses the relevant Tukwila Comprehensive, Plan shoreline policies. A copy of these policies is attached. Please review and address Goals 5.6 ; 5.8, 5.9 and 5.10. Goal 5.10 should be addressed particularly as it relates to the enlarged detention pond on the site and the source of the storm water that will flow there. Please see attached for Comprehensive Plan narrative. 6. Did the project designers consider trying to reuse or somehow save the many trees that are in the existing parking lot? Some of them appear distressed, but for the most part, they are mature trees that would provide a lot more benefit right off the bat than replacement trees. Where reasonable tree digging is possible trees located in the existing parking lot and those in the south parking lot expansion area will be dug and transplanted by Parks Department for use on other . park sites. As the demolition/construction period is outside the usual tree digging season, it is not. feasible to transplant the trees for this project. DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 5 L02 -040: Design Review Application The following code requirements have not been addressed: 1. The Landscape Plan is missing planting note details for the trees and shrubs. In addition, the plant lists include size notations that may be in error. For example, the shade trees are listed as 2.5' (foot) caliper, when 2.5" (inch) caliper probably is intended. Please review the sizes of the plans listed and adjust as appropriate. (TMC 18.52.050) Corrections to the font have been made for clarification. The landscape plan has been revised to reflect changes. 2. Please clarify the front property line location and whether perimeter landscaping is provided on the front of the site along Interurban Avenue. The Zoning Code requires 12 I/2 feet of Type I landscaping to screen the parking area. Type I landscaping requires one tree for each 30 lineal feet (these are already planted along the frontage), one shrub for each 7 lineal feet (evergreen and deciduous) and living groundcover to cover 90% of the landscape area within three years. (TMC 1.8.52.050) Existing vegetation along the Interurban frontage to remain unless identified otherwise. •Landscape plans indicate any disturbed planting along the frontage to be replaced The landscape plan has been revised to reflect these changes.. The delineation of the exact property line is unknown to the City at this time. A surveyor has been engaged to provide a final determination. Please note the proposed parking lot does not encroach any closer right -of way (and existing landscaping, bike trail and sidewalk) than the existing parking=lot 3. No quantities are specified for the proposed groundcovers nor are symbols specified :to:identifywhat` • groundcoversswill be planted where. These are required by the landscape code (TMC'18:52 050) , The landscape plan has been revised to reflect ground cover planting symbols. and ;quantities. 4. No irrigation plan has been provided for the landscaping. (TMC 18.52.050) An irrigation plan is included as a part of the re- submittal. 5. Please provide an elevation detail for the foundation/landscape island in the front -of the_building. What typical seasonal plants will be planted, particularly in the winter? The center planter is a "fountain" . of flowers and is strictly annuals planted for seasonal color. There is no structure or water in the island The landscape plan has •been revised for clarification of this item. Typical plants for winter would be Ornamental Cabbage, Ornamental Kale, and Winter Pansies. Other seasons would include bulbs, summer and f all.: annuals and perennials. 6. Wheel stops must be provided on the perimeter landscaping. (TMC 18.56.7.e.). The site plan has been revised to reflect the required wheelstops. Please let me know how many copies of the revised plan to submit. 7. Bicycle parking must be provided (1 space per 50 parking stalls). (TMC 18.56.130) The site plan has been revised to reflect the required bike parking. DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 6 .f 8. Where will garbage and recycling be collected? The collection area should be noted on either the landscape plan, with screening details noted, or on the site plan. The site plan does indicate the screened garbage /recycling enclosure55' south of the building adjacent to the l8`ti green. 9. At least one designated loading area is required. (TMC 18.56.060) Please identify where this space will be located on the site plan. The loading area is shown on the site plan on the service /fire lane at the south end of the building, between the building and the le green. 10. No information about proposed signage was submitted other than the notation on the building elevations as to possible locations for signage on the building. The BAR reviews and approved signage as part of design review. If signage design is not available for review now, it can be submitted at a future time for 'BAR review and approval. The setback for the free standing sign is taken from the front property line. We would like to defer this submittal to a future date. The following are comments and suggestions we would like to discuss with you: 11. The window treatments and sizes vary on the west elevation — some windows appear to 'have .shutters and are wider than others. Is there a reason for the differences in the window sizes /treatments ?_ -If not, please revise the design to provide a consistent size of windows. As we discussed, the style of the elevations and the treatment of the fenestration underwent: extreme scrutiny by the city, the Mayor and the council. The resulting design is u farmhouse vernacular, very common in the south King County area. A significant element in thisstyle is the "add-on" look of the building giving the appearance that the building was constructed in phases. The varying sizes of dormer windows is a significant element of this design. 12. The western elevation is dominated by the roof appearance. Can you revise the design of the projecting 'roof over the meeting rooms to provide a gable treatment similar to that shown -on the north or south elevations? As we discussed, the style of the elevations and the treatment of the roof lines underwent extreme scrutiny by the city, the Mayor and the council. The resulting design is a farmhouse vernacular, very common in the south King County area A significant element in this style is the "add -on" look of the building, giving the appearance that the building Was constructed in phases. The varying types of roof lines is also significant element of this design. 13. The Fire Department had commented that the shade trees at the main drive may need to be field adjusted to ensure ladder truck access to the clubhouse. Understood. DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC November 14, 2002 Ms. Carol Lumb Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Page 7 14. The tree cutting plan indicates that two parking stalls will be located at the far northern end of the site. The landscape plan does not identify these two stalls. Which plan is correct? Since there is a historical marker just north of these two parking stalls, did you consider some kind of linkage between historic maple tree and this marker? The landscaping plans are correct. The site plan will be revised to reflect that change. Special Permission Parking 1. Please explain what is meant by "demand loads," which is the basis for determining the number of additional parking stalls needed. How is it that the "demand loads" indicates such a higher need for parking stalls Does the "demand load" method use gross square footage rather than usable square footage as the basis for its calculations? As we discussed, the "demand load" is a based on a scenario of situations that are likely to occur at a golf course and restaurant facility. The scenario that created the greatest "demand load" was one that had a Friday afternoon shotgun golf tournament, a 7 PM wedding reception and a full restaurant and lounge. 2. The chart for Concept A states that no parking is required for the Pro Shop. Parking is required for accessory uses — and in this case, retail uses require 2.5 parking stalls for each 1,000 square feet of usable floor area. The parking study did not take into account the parking for the retail as the facility is not ,a "destination" type of retail store. It primarily serves only those patrons who are already `on site (golfers, and perhaps the occasional restaurant patron). Retail staff parking requirements were, in fact, taken into account. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. erely, avid A. Clark AIA Project Architect 1 Source: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Normed Office /Warehouse Project, September, 2001, prepared by Huckel /Weinman Associates. DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC Q Foster Golf Links Clubhouse Written Narrative of Project Consistency with the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Application L02 -044 RECEIVFD NOV 18 2002. COMMUJTY DEVELOPMENT Criteria for Projects subject to the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan 5.6 Access and Recreational Use: Varied opportunities for public access to and along the river, including visual and cultural access, access to the water's edge, opportunities for small boat navigation and access, and connections to other neighborhoods. While this project will not alter the access to the river, the project will attract more golf and non -golf citizens to the facility, which will bring greater recognition to the river and the recreational opportunities. 5.8 Historic Resource Use: Recognition of the river's contribution to the Tukwila's history and community identity through identification, enhancement, restoration, and protection of sites with historic and cultural value and through development of interpretive and educational programs. One document known to the City have suggested only documentation of the existing on -site buildings for possible historical significance. However, at the November 41h Tukwila City Council meeting, it was discussed and determined that there are no significant historical value of the five buildings on site slated to be demolished. These buildings, having been,. constructed from between 1932 (George Eddy House, currently abandoned) and 1946 (existing clubhouse). One existing large inapt tree, thought to have been planted in 1873, will remain completely;: undisturbed. This tree will be completely protected with a tempo "ral construction fence and alteration of the soil in the area under'thestric guidelines of the golf course landscape architect. 5.9 Natural Environment and Habitat Use: Restored, Enhanced, and protecte natural environmental resources along the river, including trees, wildlife' habitat and features with value for long term public, scientific, and education uses. This project will not impact the sandbars, wetlands or watercourse the river that are important for habitat, as the majority of the project is well beyond the 200' zone of the river. The portion of the work wit{iin the 40' to 200' zone is earthwork which will be held to the high City: standards of erosion control and the best known implemental practices , of the industry. Absolutely no work is to be performed within the river zone itself. The cedar trees being removed may currently provide some nesting opportunities for wildlife, but are not close enough to the river to provide shade'. While no eagles have been observed in the vicinity DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC during field visits, the large cedars could potentially be used for perching. After removal of the trees it is unknown whether eagles would seek alternate perch locations in other tall trees located on the golf course. As the go f course is always planting and removing trees during its six year master plan alteration, it is unlikely, but unknown, that the removal of the planned trees on the fully treed 60 acre site will cause disruption to the flyway patterns. Replacement trees are being installed on the golf course and in the parking lot. 5.10 Water Quality, Surface Water, and Flood Control Use: Improved water quality and quality control program affecting the Green/Duwamish River that improve the river's water quality , provide habitat for fish and wildlife, protect public health and safety, and enhance public enjoyment of the river. The design of the storm water control system is an enhancement of the existing on -site system, expanded to meet the existing off site needs as well as the larger building footprint and the larger parking lot. This enhancement is primarily an enlargement of the existing water quality treatment and pond along the number one golf hole. The pond is being enlarged as a feature of the first hole to accommodate the larger requirements of this project. The entire drainage collection and treatment system has been reviewed on a preliminary basis by the Public Works department and has been met with approval. The source of the storm water flowing through the site is primarily, ;s storm water collected in the parking lot of the facility, as the existiri_ lot is being re- graded and expanded. The storm water from the. building footprint will either be tied into the storm system or will;; discharged into the new water feature adjacent to the new ninthgree The only off -site introduction of water is the existing tie to the'storm water collected from the City Shops and golf course maintenance' building. At the request of the City Public Works department the pond is being enlarged to handle the off site storm water from the shopsthat was previously not addressed. This existing connection to the Shops is not being altered under this project. This clubhouse project is not adding a fuel storage area to the:go course, and it is not altering any method of storing, handling or-useo fertilizers. The entire list offertilizers used at the site has been approved by the City Public Works Department's Biologist for use 'Oki, all areas of the course, including the areas adjacent to the river. To reduce the impact on the storm system and the river, this project will not house any fertilizers under any circumstances, even temporarily. Source: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Normed Office /Warehouse Project, September, 2001, prepared by Huckel /Weinman Associates. DAVID A. CLARK ARCHITECTS, PLLC Carol Lumb - Email for -you From: Bao Trinh To: Carol Lumb Date: 11/18/02 8:44AM Subject: Email for you • MAIL FROM: <IMCEAEX - O= PACIFIC +5FCOAST +5FHWY OU= NIEXHQ01 CN= RECIPIENTS CN= N000939 7(a�nationalcar.com> RCPT TO : <www.clumb0,ci.tukwila.wa.us.> Received: from mrmfh01anc06.nationalcar.com (dfwmail.goalamo.com [12.43.146.85]) by CT -BM1; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:24:36 -0800 Received: by dfwmail.goalamo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <WH9HCYBL >; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:24:33 -0600 Message -ID: < FB4DC771AEF1D211BF9A0008C707B25503C42A0A 0,mhgth51arg01.nationalcar.com> From: "Buck, Diane E." <IMCEAEX- O= PACIFIC +5FCOAST +5FHWY OU= NIEXHQ01 CN= RECIPIENTS CN= N0009397Anati onalcar.com> To: "'www.clumb cr ci.tukwila.wa.us. "' <www.clumb(c�ci.tukwila.wa.us.> Subject: tree cutting @ the foster golf course Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:24:31 -0600 MIME - Version: 1.0 X- Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content -Type: text/plain; charset = "iso- 8859 -1" CAROL, I AM DIANE BUCK @ 13048 - 57TH AVE SOUTH. FOSTER POINT. I DO NOT WANT ANY EVERGREEN TREES CUT IN TH SHORE LINE AREA NEAR THE "FOSTER HOMESTEAD TREE" ALL THAT USE THE BRIDGE ENJOY THE TREES AND SEVERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (STATE & FEDERAL) HAVE ENACTED LAWS & GUIDELINES RE TREE CLEARING, & DIRT MOVEMENT NEAR WATERWAYS. THESE GUIDELINES ARE NOT THERE TO BE CHANGED AS CITY AND PRIVATE PARTIES WANT TO DEVELOP AREAS FOR FINANCIAL GAIN. I SELDOM SEE THE PARKING LOT FULL OF CARS WITH ONLY GOLFERS, IF THE EXTRA SPACE IS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE USING THE NEW MEETING SPACE OR RESTAURANT PATRONS OTHER MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION & OR PARKING SHOULD BE FOUND. PERHAPS UNDERGROUND PARKING UNDER THE "CLUB HOUSE" OR THE 20' (TWENTY FOOT) FIRE LANE. AGAIN PLEASE DO NOT CUT THE EVERGREEN TREES. THANKS DIANE (PS I CAN NOT RECEIVE EMAIL - MY HOME # IS 206 431 3456 WORK 448 7368 ) • Gilles Csulting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5— 8 2 2 — 4 9 9 4 EVALUATION OF AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN TO PRESERVE THE FOSTER MEMORIAL TREE DURING DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION November 14, 2002 PREPARED FOR: Rick Still, Assistant Director Tukwila Parks and Recreation 12424 42 "d Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 PREPARED BY: GILLES CONSULTING Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certification # PN -0260 Email: bkgillestattbi.com Fax: 425-822-6314 E -mail: bkgilles @aol.com 12823 NE 107th Place Kirkland, WA 98033 • • CONTENTS ASSIGNMENT METHODOLOGY GENERAL SITE NOTES OBSERVATIONS TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SCHEDULE WAIVER OF LIABILITY ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan with Tree Protection Fences shown 2. Photos of Tree 3. References Consulted Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 2 of 12 • • ASSIGNMENT: Gilles Consulting was hired by Tukwila Assistant Parks Director Rick Still to provide a Tree Preservation Plan to protect the Foster Memorial Tree during the development and construction activities scheduled for the Foster Links Golf Course. METHODOLOGY: To evaluate the tree and to prepare the report, I drew upon my 20+ years of experience in the field and my formal education in Natural Resources Management, Dendrology, Forest Ecology, Plant Identification, and Plant Physiology. I also followed the protocol of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for Hazard Tree Assessment while looking at the overall health of the tree and the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, the surrounding land and the soil, as well as a complete look at the trees themselves. In examining the tree, I looked at such factors as: size, vigor, crown ratio and class, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging limbs. While no one can predict with absolute certainty which trees will or will not fall, we can, by using this scientific process, assess which trees are most likely to fail and take appropriate action to minimize injury and damage. GENERAL SITE NOTES: The Foster Memorial Tree is a beautiful Big Leaf Maple, Acer macrophyllum tree planted July 4, 1873 by Joseph Foster. It is located between Interurban Avenue South and the Green River in the Foster Golf Links in a small patch of lawn with two other trees and some shrubs. The lawn area is just north of the existing house, which is scheduled for demolition. This lawn area is bordered on the west by an existing parking lot that is slightly higher in elevation than the lawn itself. There is an access road thatcurves around the lawn area to the north and east. OBSERVATIONS: • The tree is currently 61.7 inches in diameter measured at the standard 4.5 feet above the ground. • The tree is 82 feet tall (measured with a clinometer.) • The canopy: o The shape of the canopy is generally symmetrical in shape and weight distribution around the trunks. o The foliage is dense for the species indicating a high level of vigor. o The crown, the top 10 to 15% of the canopy, is healthy and strong. This also indicates a high level of health and vigor. • The trunk is typical for the species: o The trunk forks into two large trunks 12 to 14 feet above the ground. o The two trunks were previously topped at 24 and 28 feet. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 3of12 • • o New scaffold branches have developed from the trunks below the topping wounds. o Rot has developed in the trunks below the topping cuts and extends down into the main trunk. • With the use of binoculars I observed the main trunks and major branches. No insect infestations or woodpecker activity was observed. • The tree appears to have adequate solid wood to support itself at this time and has the potential to survive one or more decades into the future. o The root collar has no apparent defects, no apparent fungal or bacterial infections, and no observable insect infestations. GENERAL HEALTH CONCLUSIONS: The tree is in good health and structure considering its age and poor pruning of the past. The tree has potentially many decades of life left and is worthy of extra effort to maintain it during expansion of the parking lots and other improvements planned for the golf course. TREE PROTECTION MEASURES: In order for trees to survive the stresses placed upon them in the construction process, tree protection must be planned in advance of equipment arrival on site. If tree protection is not planned integral with the design and layout of the project, the trees will suffer needlessly and will possibly die. With proper preparation, often adding little or nothing extra to the project budget, trees can survive and thrive after construction. This is critical for tree survival because damage prevention is the single most effective treatment for trees on construction sites. Once trees are damaged, the available treatment options are limited. The following minimum Tree Protection Measures are included on three separate sheets so that they can be copied and introduced into all relevant documents such as site plans, permit applications and conditions of approval, and bid documents so that everyone involved is aware of the requirements. To be effective, these measures must be understood by all involved in the project from the project manager, to the on site construction supervisor, down to every single equipment operator who will be operating equipment in the vicinity of the tree. The Tree Protection Fence installation, the trenching and root pruning, and the removal of the current asphalt must be overseen by an experienced ISA Certified Arborist to ensure the tree's continued long -term health. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 4 of 12 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES: • Tree Protection Fences will need to be placed around the tree. • Tree Protection Fences are to be placed according to the attached drawing. • Tree Protection Fences must be inspected by both the City Parks representative and the Consulting Arborist prior to the beginning of any construction work activities. • Nothing must be parked or stored within the Tree Protection Fences —no equipment, vehicles, soil, debris, or construction supplies of any sorts. • No burning is to be allowed within the Tree Protection Zone, under the dripline of any retained trees, or within 30 feet of the Tree Protection Fences. • Cement trucks must not be allowed to deposit waste or wash out materials from their trucks within the Tree Protection Fences. • The Tree Protection Fences need to be clearly marked with the following or similar text: This portion to be done in four -inch or larger letters: o "TREE PROTECTION FENCE DO NOT ENTER THIS AREA DO NOT PARK OR STORE MATERIALS WITHIN THE PROTECTION AREA" This portion to be done in three -inch letters: "This tree has been valued at $27,600.00. Any damage done to the tree or roots will cause a fine to be levied upon the perpetrator of the damage commensurate with the level of damage. Any questions, call Brian K. Gilles at Gilles Consulting @ 425- 417 - 0850" • The area within the Tree Protection Fencing must be covered with wood chips, hog fuel, or similar materials to a depth of 8 to 10 inches. The materials should be placed prior to beginning construction and remain until the Tree Protection Fencing is taken down at the end of the project during final landscaping. • A drip irrigation system must be installed in order to prevent the stress of construction from negatively impacting the tree. o Irrigation water must not be allowed to strike the trunk or base of the tree. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 5 of 12 • • o Tree should be watered once every 14 to 21 days. Water penetration must reach to a depth of 14 to 18 inches. Once this depth of water penetration is achieved, the area should be allowed to dry out for 14 to 21 days. • When excavation or fill occurs near the, this includes the demolition of the existing house, the removal of the existing parking lot and roadway, the installation of any utilities within 10 feet of the tree protection fencing, removal of trees near the Foster Memorial Tree, or any other construction activities required, the following procedure must be followed to protect the long term survivability of the tree: o An International Society of Arboriculture, (ISA) Certified Arborist must be working with all equipment operators. o The Certified Arborist should be outfitted with a shovel, hand pruners, a pair of loppers, a handsaw, and a power saw (a "sawsall" is recommended). o When any roots of one inch diameter or greater, of the tree to be retained, is struck by the equipment, the Certified Arborist should stop the equipment operator. o The Certified Arborist should then excavate around the tree root by hand/shovel and cleanly cut the tree root. o The Certified Arborist should then instruct the equipment operator to continue. o Boring under the root systems of the trees (and other vegetation) can be considered for utility installation. All work must be done under the direct supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist. This is to be accomplished by excavating a limited trench or pit on each side of the critical root zone of the tree and then hand digging or pushing the pipe through the soil under the tree. The closest pit walls shall be a minimum of 7 feet from the center of the tree and shall be sufficient depth to lay the pipe at the grade as shown on the plan and profile. o Tunneling under the roots of trees shall be done under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist in an open trench by carefully excavating and hand digging around areas where large roots are exposed. No roots 1 inch in diameter or larger shall be cut. o The contractor shall verify the vertical and horizontal location of existing utilities to avoid conflicts and maintain minimum clearances; adjustment shall be made to the grade of any new utility as required. ■ Demolition of existing house: o It is my judgment that the house can be demolished and hauled away without any impacts on the Foster Memorial Tree if the following measures are precisely followed and if the Project Consulting Arborist is on site during the demolition. o When the house is demolished, placement of equipment and trucks is important to protect the tree. Track hoes and other large equipment shall Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 6of12 Voe r\,a, • • be placed in accordance with the specifications given by the Consulting Arborist who will be on site present during all the demolition and hauling away of the house. o Specifically, the equipment will be placed on the east and west sides of the house and south of the house. o All work will be done working from the south in such a manner that the boom or bucket will not come into contact with the canopy of the tree. • Removal of the gravel driveway at the base of the tree, within the dripline, should be done by hand under the direct supervision of the Project Consulting Arborist. o Work will consist of removing the gravel with hand tools and replacing the gravel with aged compost. • Removal of the Port Orford Cedar, Chamaecyparis lawsoniana tree west of the Foster Memorial Tree will be done by the following procedure: o The lower branches will be cut off to a height of at least 12 feet. o This will allow room for a small ditch witch, not a hoe mounted unit but the smallest self propelled model available, to be utilized to trench a swath as close to the base of the Cedar tree as possible to a depth of 42 inches. o The Consulting Arborist will be on site to supervise this work and to provide root - pruning services as noted above. • If the large Rhododendron, located 42 feet south and slightly east of the Foster Memorial Tree is to be removed rather than preserved in its current location, a similar process must be followed. o The only difference is that the trench shall only be 8 to 10 inches deep. o No other equipment is to be used to remove the large shrub. Other than the trencher, all work must be done by hand under the supervision of the Consulting Arborist. • The critical root zone of the tree must be injected with a combination of beneficial mycorrhizal fungi and tree based fertilizer. o Mychorrhizal fungi are naturally occurring beneficial fungi that form a symbiotic relationship with the tree roots that improve the tree's ability to absorb water and nutrients significantly. This will promote healthy root growth, which generally results in a healthier tree. o Trees have different nutritional needs than turf or shrubs. Lawn fertilizer can actually cause harm to trees — especially trees under stress. Tree based fertilizers are formulated specifically to meet the nutritional needs of trees. This is especially important in old Maple trees that can be harmed from excess nitrogen. o This injection can occur this fall prior to the installation of the 8 to 10 inches of mulch, or can be done sometime between late March or April 2003. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 7 of 12 • • Significant Existing Tree Continuous chainlink / Fencing Post c@ Max 10" O.C. O :o Install as shown on plans a minimum of 5 feet outside dripline of tree(s) 1. Six -foot high temporary chainlink fence shall be placed as shown on plans. Fence shall completely encircle tree. Install fence posts using pier blocks only. Avoid driving posts or stakes into major roots. 2. An experienced ISA Certified Arborist must be present during any construction activities near the tree including: removal of asphalt, demolition of the house, removal of adjacent trees, grading or filling. 3. Work with the protection fencing shall be done manually. No stockpiling of materials, soil, debris, vehicle traffic, or storage of equipment or machinery shall be allowed within the limit of the fencing. 4. Cement trucks must not be allowed to deposit waste or wash out materials from their trucks within the Tree Protection Fences. 5. The area within the Tree Protection Fencing must be covered with wood chips, hog fuel, or similar materials to a depth of 8 to 10 inches. The materials should be placed prior to beginning construction and remain until the Tree Protection Fencing is taken down. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 8 of 12 • • WAIVER OF LIABILITY: There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. As conditions change is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long -term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required permits from the city, county, stated, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs. I hope this report answers your questions. Please call me if I can provide more information or be of further service. Sincerely, rian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist — PN -0260 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Plan with Tree Protection Fences shown 2. Photos of Tree 3. References Consulted Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 9 of 12 ATTACHMENT 1: FOSTER LINKS SITE PLAN Page 10of12 If t. • h • INTE U1 ATTACHMENT 2: The Foster Memorial Tree and the Port Orford Cedar Tree. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 11 of 12 • ATTACHMENT 3: REFERENCES CONSULTED: 1. Harris, Richard W. et al, Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1999. 2. Mattheck, Claus Prof. and Ass. Jur Mrs. Helge Breloer, The Body Language of Trees, A Handbook for Failure Analysis, HMSO, London, England. 1994. 3. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Evaluation of Hazard Trees, Second Edition, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1994 4. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Trees & Development, A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1998. 5. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., A New Tree Biology, Facts, Photos, and Philosophies on Trees and Their Problems and Proper Care. Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, New Hampshire. 1993. 6. Shigo, Alex L. Ph.D., Modern Arboriculture, A Systems Approach to the Care of Trees and Their Associates, Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, NH. 1991. 7. Watson, Dr. Gary W., & Dr. Dan Neely Editors, Trees & Building Sites, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, IL. 1995. Foster Memorial Tree Tree Protection Plan November 14, 2002 Page 12 of 12 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 12, 2002 David A. Clark David A. Clark Architects 11737 SE 256th Place Kent, WA 98031 -7897 RE: Proposed Foster Golf Course Clubhouse Dear Mr. Clark: We have had an opportunity to review in further detail the proposed new clubhouse and have the following questions or comments on the design, SEPA, Shoreline or Special Permission Parking applications. E02 -020 SEPA The following information must be provided to complete review of the SEPA application: 1. Regarding item #3.a.6. Please discuss handling of parking lot runoff, runoff from the shops, carts and other equipment and handling of fertilizers, application and storage and how this may impact waters draining to the enlarged detention pond. Will there be fuel storage areas on- site? What measures are planned to handle any spills that may occur? 2. Item #4/5: Plants and Animals: This project includes removal of several large cedar trees that are part of a Windrow planted possibly at the same time that the George Eddy home was constructed. The sequoia trees being removed within the 100' Low Impact Environment shoreline boundary provide many habitat benefits, including fishery benefits. Replacement with smaller trees does not totally mitigate the removal. If these trees are ultimately removed, this project will be required to provide riverbank habitat improvements as a mitigation measure along with replacement trees as required by TMC 18.54.130 3. 3. Item #12. It appears that construction of the parking lot will temporarily affect the location of the Green River Trail along Interurban Avenue South. Please describe how Trail users will be accommodated during construction, specifically how the Trail users will be notified of construction activity that will disrupt use of the Trail and where the Trail will be re- routed. 4. Item 7. Environmental Health a.2., a spill response and pollution prevention plan will be required for the construction activities. 5. Item #13: Please provide an evaluation from a certified arborist on the impacts to the historical tree of the building demolition (George Eddy house), and any improvements to the 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. David A. Clark Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 12, 2002 inner driveway that provides vehicle access to parking stalls on the west side of the site. A detail on how the historic tree will be protected during construction, reviewed and approved by the arborist, must be provided. 6. The remainder of the Windrow of large sequoia trees is proposed for removal just outside the 200' shoreline boundary. Did you consider a plan that would incorporate these trees into the landscape plan? What is the impact to the overall parking for this project if the Windrow trees are retained? The following are comments or suggestions we would like to discuss: 7. Item #13: While not as old as the Foster Maple Tree, the Windrow of sequoia trees should also be included among the historical resources on the site, as they are thought to have been planted around the same time as when the George Eddy house was constructed. 8. As a point of information, the following responses should have been included in the SEPA Checklist: • 4. Plants c. "No listed plant species in Tukwila." • 5. Animals b. "Bald eagle, Chinook salmon, bull trout" • 5. Animals c. Pacific flyway, migratory birds, Duwamish River anadromous salmon L02 -044: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application The following information must be provided for review of the shoreline permit: 1. A flood control zone application is required along with the shoreline permit. A copy of this permit is attached. This application must be completed and submitted before the Shoreline Substantial Development permit can be issued. 2. Item 4: The shoreline application must discuss the habitat impacts to the shoreline environment of the removal of the cedar trees. 3. Item 5: Water that is discharged to the detention pond will be collected from a variety of sources, including fertilized greens and areas where leakage from vehicles is possible (parking lots, shops). What impacts will this have on the water that discharges to the Duwamish River? 4. Item 7: This area is along the Pacific Flyway and bald eagle, Chinook salmon and bull trout are listed protected species that are found in the vicinity. How will these habitats be impacted by the development and how will the habitat be protected? 5. The application is missing a narrative that addresses the relevant Tukwila Comprehensive Plan shoreline policies. A copy of these policies is attached. Please review and address Goals 5.6, 5.8, 5.9, and 5.10. Goal 5.10 should be addressed particularly as it relates to the enlarged detention pond on the site and the source of the storm water that will flow there. c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course Clubhouse \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Mr. David A. Clark Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 12, 2002 L02 -040: Design Review Application The following code requirements have not been addressed: 1. The Landscape Plan is missing planting note details for the trees and shrubs. In addition, the plant lists include size notations that may be in error. For example, the shade trees are listed as 2.5' (foot) caliper, when 2.5" (inch) caliper probably is intended. Please review the sizes of the plants listed and adjust as appropriate. (TMC 18.52.050) 2. Please clarify the front property line location and whether perimeter landscaping is provided on the front of the site along Interurban Avenue. The Zoning Code requires 12 1/2 feet of Type I landscaping to screen the parking area. Type I landscaping requires one tree for each 30 lineal feet (these are already planted along the frontage), one shrub for each 7 lineal feet (evergreen and deciduous) and living groundcover to cover 90% of the landscape area within three years. (TMC 18.52.030) 3. No quantities are specified for the proposed groundcovers nor are symbols specified to identify what groundcovers will be planted where. These are required by the landscape code (TMC 18.52.050) 4. No irrigation plan has been provided for the landscaping. (TMC 18.52.050) 5. Please provide an elevation detail for the fountain/landscape island in the front of the building. What typical seasonal plants will be planted, particularly in the winter? 6. Wheel stops must be provided on the perimeter landscaping. (TMC 18.56.7.e.) 7. Bicycle parking must be provided (1 space per 50 parking stalls). (TMC18.56.130) 8. Where will garbage and recycling be collected? The collection area should be noted on either the landscape plan, with screening details noted, or on the site plan. 9. At least one designated loading area is required. (TMC 18.56.060) Please identify where this space will be located on the site plan. 10. No information about proposed signage was submitted other than the notation on the building elevations as to possible locations for signage on the building. The BAR reviews and approves signage as part of design review. If signage design is not available for review now, it can be submitted at a future time for BAR review and approval. The setback for the free standing sign is taken from the front property line. The following are comments or suggestions we would like to discuss with you: 11. The window treatments and sizes vary on the west elevation — some windows appear to have shutters and are wider than others. Is there a reason for the differences in the window sizes /treatments? If not, please revise the design to provide a consistent size of windows. 12. The western elevation is dominated by the roof appearance. Can you revise the design of the projecting roof over the meeting rooms to provide a gable treatment similar to that shown on the north or south elevations? 13. The Fire Department has commented that the shade trees at the main drive may need to be field adjusted to ensure ladder truck access to the new clubhouse. 14. The tree cutting plan indicates that two parking stalls will be located at the far northern end of the site. The landscape plan does not identify these two stalls. Which plan is correct? Since there is a historical marker just north of these two parking stalls, did you consider some kind of linkage between the historic maple tree and this marker? 3 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course Clubhouse \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Mr. David A. Clark Foster Golf Course Clubhouse November 12, 2002 Special Permission Parking 1. Please explain what is meant by "demand loads," which is the basis for determining the number of additional parking stalls needed. How is it that the "demand loads" indicate such a higher need for parking stalls? Does the "demand load" method use gross square footage rather than usable square footage as the basis for its calculations? 2. The chart for Concept A states that no parking is required for the Pro Shop. Parking is required for accessory uses — and in this case, retail uses require 2.5 parking stalls for each 1,000 square feet of usable floor area. Consideration of the design review application is scheduled for the December 12, 2002 Planning Commission meeting. As you know, this project is on a tight timeline. In order to complete the staff reports needed, both for the Planning Commission meeting as well as the issuance of the SEPA and Shoreline permits, we need the requested information as soon as possible, but absolutely no later than Monday, November 18, 2002. The SEPA and Shoreline permits must be issued November 20 so that the 21 day appeal period for the Shoreline permit can run its course before the Planning Commission hearing. We would appreciate your review of the comments noted above. If you would like to discuss any of the items, please let me know and we can schedule a meeting. You can reach me at 206- 431 -3661. Sincerely, 6/. Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Rick Still, Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Jill Mosqueda, Engineer Enclosures: Sign Permit Application Flood Control Zone Permit Application Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Shoreline Policies 4 c: \mydocs \Foster Golf Course Clubhouse \Technical Comments Ltr.doc Carol Lumb - RE: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Page 1 • From: Carol Lumb To: Neller, John R Date: 11/5/02 3:25PM Subject: RE: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Hi John: Sorry for the delay getting back to you. I checked with Parks Department staff. There will be no impact to the Interurban Trail, as it officially ends on the south side of 1-405. However, the Green River Trail does run along Interurban Ave. at the clubhouse site, rather than along the river, so at various times during construction there will be impacts to the Trail. We haven't worked out the details yet on alternate routes, and notification to trail users when the regular route will be disrupted. Can you give me a mailing address so I can put you on my mailing list for Parties of Record ?. Also, if you are a trail user and have suggestions on how to handle temporary re- routings, please let me know. If you have any other questions or comments, please contact me. Carol Lumb »> "Neller, John R" <john.r.neller @boeing.com> 11/05/02 02:18PM »> Hi, I was wondering if you had heard anything on this subject Original Message From: Carol Lumb [ mailto:clumba,ci.tukwila.wa.usj Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:34 PM To: Neller, John R Cc: Rick Still Subject: Re: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Mr. Neller: thank you for your comments. I will look into your question on the impact of the golf course revisions to the Interurban Trail when I return to the office 10/28. I will get back to you as soon as I have some information. Thank you for reviewing the proposed land use application. Carol Lumb »> "Neller, John R" <Iohn.r.neller(c�boeinq.com> 10/18/02 06:28PM »> Per our telephone conversation on October 17, please verify any impacts or lack thereof of the upcoming Foster Golf Course construction on the Interurban Trail. I can be reached by e-mail or at 206 - 655 -7439. Thank you. Carol Lumb - Re: Interurban Trail and Fir Golf Course Construction From: Rick Still To: Carol Lumb Date: 10/21/02 11:56AM Subject: Re: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Carol, There is no impact of the Interurban Trail by the Foster Golf Course Construction. The Interurban Trail ends on the south side of 1 -405, about a mile to 1.5 miles south of the Clubhouse Project. The Green /Duwamish River Trail does go along the Clubhouse Project site. This portion of the trail follows the street (Interurban Avenue S.) rather than along the river. Therefore, this trail will need to be taken into consideration when construction does impact this sidewalk/trail. There may be three to four days one -day at a time to make the proposed Clubhouse improvements. We will have to work with the contractor to make sure these areas are handled appropriately for trail users. We could make sure notices are made a week in advance or provide alternate routes or temporary access through the construction site. As you probably have seen on the plans, there are two new entrances and removal of the existing entrance that will impact this trail, as well as, potential construction traffic. Let me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, Rick Rick Still Assistant Director, Parks and Recreation Department 206 - 767 -2344 »> Carol Lumb 10/18/02 06:33PM >» Mr. Neller: thank you for your comments. I will look into your question on the impact of the golf course revisions to the Interurban Trail when I return to the office 10/28. I will get back to you as soon as I have some information. Thank you for reviewing the proposed land use application. Carol Lumb »> "Neller, John R" <iohn.r.nellerboeinq.com> 10/18/02 06:28PM »> Per our telephone conversation on October 17, please verify any impacts or lack thereof of the upcoming Foster Golf Course construction on the Interurban Trail. I can be reached by e-mail or at 206 - 655 -7439. Thank you. Interurban Trail and Fier Golf Course Construction To: Neller, John R Cc: Rick Still Subject: Re: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Mr. Neller: thank you for your comments. I will look into your question on the impact of the golf course revisions to the Interurban Trail when I return to the office 10/28. I will get back to you as soon as I have some information. Thank you for reviewing the proposed land use application. Carol Lumb »> "Neller, John R" <john.r.neller @boeing.com> 10/18/02 06:28PM »> Per our telephone conversation on October 17, please verify any impacts or lack thereof of the upcoming Foster Golf Course construction on the Interurban Trail. I can be reached by e-mail or at 206 - 655 -7439. Thank you. CC: "Neller, John R" <john.r.neller @boeing.com> • CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS Project Name: File #: Other Permits: Date: Reviewer: Foster Golf Club House E02 -020 SEPA Review #: 1 L02 -044 Shoreline Review #: 1 p. 02 -075 M102 -154 Tree Permit 10.10.02 L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. The City Of Tukwila Public Works Department has the following comments regarding your application for the above permit. Please contact Jill Mosqueda at (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. E02 -020 SEPA 1. This project includes constrcution of a new golf cart area. The SEPA' must address all storage and fueling issues related to carts and other golf course equipment. 2. This project includes removal of several large cedar trees. The 32' tree being removed within the 100' boundary provides many habitat benefits, including fishery benefits. Replacement with smaller trees does not totally mitigate the removal. The work on this project must include riverbank habitat improvements along the north end of the parking lot. 3. Several other large cedar trees are being removed inside or just outside the 200' boundary. The Applicant should discuss why removal is necessary. 4. Please discuss handling of parking lot runoff, carts and other golf vehicles and handl;ing of fertilizers, application and storage. (3. Water a.6. ). 5. The following are standard answers which the Applicant did not provide: • 4. Plants c. "No listed plant species in Tukwila." • 5. Animals b. "Bald eagle, Chinook salmon, bull trout Projects /Foster golf clubhouse /SEPA shoreline comm 1 1 • • 5. Animals c. Pacific flyway, migratory birds, Duwamish River anadromous salmon 6. The Applicant, under 7. Environmental Health a.2., shall provide a spill response and pollution prevention plan for the construction activities. L02 -044 SHORELINE 7. You must provide a flood control zone application with the shoreline permit. 8. Item 4. Why are the large cedars being removed? 9. Item 5. What happens with vehicle fueling? What about fertilizers? 10. Item 7 Applicant shall describe how bald eagle, Chinook salmon and bull trout will be protected. Projects /Foster golf clubhouse /SEPA shoreline comm 1 2 Carol Lumb - Interurban Trail and Fosto —off Course Construction From: "Neller, John R" <john.r.neller @boeing.com> To: "'clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <clumb @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 10/18/02 6:29PM Subject: Interurban Trail and Foster Golf Course Construction Per our telephone conversation on October 17, please verify any impacts or lack thereof of the upcoming Foster Golf Course construction on the Interurban Trail. I can be reached by e-mail or at 206 - 655 -7439. Thank you. CC: " Neller, John R" <john.r.neller @boeing.com> • Mc3PR!lETF 13500 Interurban Ave S Tukwila, WA 98168 -3332, US i cP S 1291y,St 0 ; S 127th-PI ; \ l Y .R � h • - O • Back -01 i200m S 125th St soon ::.$126th PI • 4: 304 °''. Of, R ec adam S 1361h St` S 137th Si CbPa� . S 139th St o�.eph . Foster (etrivrial;Parl:. _. Foster oif, Links to S 142nd St rA thi St >ti D S 146th St lo) 02002 MapQuestcom. Inc.: 02002 Naviciatbn Tech. echnobaias ,1q rights reservgd_Use Subject to License copyright Qi S 143rd St Tukwila \% m cf? r; Hazeliii ;Park Lai S 1 ,.47th St This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to Its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any Toss or delay resulting from such use. privacy Policy & Le.gal_Noticas © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT http: / /www.mapquest.com/ maps / print. adp? mapdata= xU4YXdELrnBF7ub %2f4bLfx 1 MrjL... 8/16/2002 tieWro0 .0•,777 .777,772/10.17717 `7•;"=1:1°. 1# JUI tf /. 0 -woe me ..c.r-a LAM 1711.7717•74 71717C 4710VCO, BUILDING INFORMATION ti) 410111. • 0 INTERURBAN AVE. 1;71.7.71.7rr ■7•7■00.4 1 t ; A c--; m ,• <:m, .<< —J LTI I 19111 7 77" SITE PLAN 7C.LE, CRAPIC SCALE PARKING DATA ntu 7.777:7U.A• •r-CISO REC A G CICv nt St a. 17900 I nrernavonal /that Soo ST. \V.\ 08100 2,16.241.9I(K Nor ScaTac Ciry I lag Valk y Rule Rolm anon atno So. IMO Sr. Fora, WA 08)88 01.02 DAC 08/08/02 V4',At'r SITE PLAN & IT.NERAL INFORNIAllON AS SI IOWN 1 4; C 0 LIEVELCIRE)!IgArr NORTH ELEVATION O 1 • • r FEET EAST ELEVATION e 1 • . r 1(:e] SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION e 1 . • r K[T ei Cit7 of Tukwila 13900 lnxnrban .3%c. Sn Tukwila, 3 98168 206.43101717 9 Ned Fos., Golf links (:luhhwae 135001n Ave. So drl Tuka. WA WA 98168 u DAC 03/20/02 TUT -DING ELEVATIONS =rm A -201 .1111. 1.0.4 rime. 0/a/02 less , N ,r1; ■ • .c 0 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA - FOSTER GOLF LINKS CLARK ARCHITECTS SNINGION el.*: BUSH. ROED & NITCHINGS. INC. CINL ENGINEERS • LAND JRAETS EIRH OVIL 1714•3•130 TOR tiAK TM* OF. • EM.tW TOOTER ua'e.TEAO• TREE TO RIEMAN iNDISTLPLED LCV» O FORCED w etsc nae• ST OreR i ) 1 J 1 1 1 1 II 1� ICe TR aLOW RAM L.e ee' CLCv ocas AREA O PU N ROD PLUM 0 LDR ZONE cL1a1 $urwART uia•we rwAeu 16C. LISOR•m cA.mFLT ARIA 0 'NIA kW; Irla ROOD 1,AM M IAN .14Pe MAO NOTES — cram= 5101 MN 51•C• ••a• R.•.cr rcTT geom. r. ■D.. •.. WART .Dee ROME NM Lae rMOTO ITN A.•.••••••. GENERAL NOTES urotw ORAOE.. RLMCT G OM01•00101•00110 IRE 0•••••• *CA PO.. KORY.4,040 ?E t% • GET Of. (ALTERED CARCNO /RR PaJn ' TZ AeC•W1 ROHM `(1`1`1:: Pew. J ep enµ INTERURBAN AVEK .Et LA a.CY! BUILDING ITOOIa'TATION OHM) F 1.01109 >cr ergese TOTAL m1Deu APRA Or 141 IV PERMIT BITE PLAN SCALE: Obs Y MP "MT RYE MOMS. *MORO/ NOM TO BIDDER 4 PARKING DATA fe96lnfsm ®Cm VMS ACCEO.'KO wACCEOaDLO +'ACI .IAwAM 70 TOTAL • FN CA7 DfTie0. 139001mmot n Ave 7u Wool; WA 9916E 2764500179 New ram Cd7IL0D od1•sne 135001mmolon Ave Se Tfr WA 99169 Pfi96DT S278 PLAN 11111.••■••••••••■• COI'S KLXON • htlrld SUS 11/1.LIIVd 434 '0084•18 i0/01/11 T•130 11/11 • man" 7143C, C13.1.2 lad / L — 1 1 448.4.41 Naas. .12.1 • •••11,..rovl 'ad I 11•TV•1•1 0.11VOCI IVY. 424 .4 ...• 1 414,21r i ..... / a / 0 1 ... ... --- - - - IV/ 111 w.lorso .74 1•4144•1 L 1•111,1•1 OHda ••• 1.,/N1 2•01,1•10”. 1.63•73 •44.. ..... .0-.0C•4 401[41•01.1 1•17041111.4 .702 MCA ON. 440141.1 0.1/141 43.148.4 aa OC 44 • 0 H.LbiON •14 MI Tone <ULM .• AMY Y./ • 1=11,131112 eslamr 1.141 IMP IWONVI44,64. 4114 .0.44•1411 MO 08 W. ao• Nalat441.4 1.011,184.10 MX= St.(4711114 1110413041,1423211Z 1 /04401.1.444.2 ‘1011•71a 411,701 ...14414 001,411 0314,7135 0411.Ur411:41 run arl.f• TNIVACIN VW 8 ,81,1.1 .4 • *OW ••■1111•47 lia•.••■ 131,7.4 TV ()WIN WO. ■•••41.1Inchra fe4,14.■ ve .14 14-1441, • 41/45/ .Y4,0 0811•0 ,1■4.6 .177. 1.01110 Y. • 1.1101•12•017•11 t.5 40 104 011.1M1141 NMI HY 11:111.• 1101•4441 141114•4.01,• '44 • V.. 1:4140.2 SC4414.1 4.4.. ev.oup crvag,w. VII • 1117.11.9.• Ora NAV .• 42..4.41 11114.1.701 1.7141110.41.12•4 IC. VW • Prat OW. ..*21 fl gHION vri 45. 01..1.1.14 Oi.V.11.0111•1•• MOO 4.14.1eCCI. 4,11210.1 •=e8== Jai • MVO 0111.474 1481444 04•41 Vg ORM NVWt LB6Q■IO 0 �.. .., .,....e•......,.. moomo, In/MOM OtO02■111 CIAO OM /WOW 119.1:1 -- O. aewa e.a.e® KA* MOTE/ NOTEIS P■114 s'IM OD WPM CO CLOWN. 47 4 ILLIMID OP 1211=17/41.11101 COL 1•11.11. GDI.OIO 88 ..A P.r. W p1Al Ith on.el.....e.. .vr • aar+n rr av .en .,o+ NIP GPM. 0.1 PM 11■01110 • 1704•101 MORMON 1. KB COMMIT. ISM PPR nos to 661.179... LIMP OP M.0 PO.a_ IVO DOOM 6. MOO ROCCO toPTOttO • • • 1111111 MT. PARTIAL SITE PLAN I SOUTH SCALE. r.,o.r I'I. ID • . . u rear INTERURBAN AVE. C27 dTi.e. 15910 lotavMP Aw. Se. 715.06. WA 91161 71164730179 New Man Golf Ik . Oubbo.r 15500 . WA IP Awe Sa TeS.y WA 91166 PAITAL 5178 PLAN - SOV1H A-104 101E GRAKL, PL•C! 00015 TO 1!0444 • ADJACENT ORADE0100 1,5110101110 TREE RDOtS LED O. SC*. LED E. 0,1111 \ ,1 ,1.L LL• Ili l '�..I; i'i L,= A 444 400140.4 ▪ ,}I °bbLe1.044 i' "sKDR„ !E -u1"rft= '.�3°. 1°11 x.163- 6EEDE0 , (1 ldw' CG 0101111/41.014tt DAIWA RAMA PBB 71.012 41070.01 CCEPACI 211- Px/S61O51 .E. 111,O01 41011 STREET 54000140E TO RPluH..00S NO7200n110*1SE N.tlu 1X11100 NECOE 1#0 RECLee4b4 SUMS 1 DROLDD COVER dt DISTURBED uea0 CH MST SIDE OP CURD PLANT LIST M. WM.. •0001 E;F57IDfF[T- O *0.001 DSCAPE PLAN ORM 14101 • .44104 PLAMAC4044 0110,04 X10 • ACA 111104111 111104111 -0001471' • nwto•St•n.•.eu 014444.414044 041411 O * 101100NMR w 0•4041010 DRnR 1® 1 0.0140A RM. 4014140 0400101* 404 VOM110 w+rtttt10 Den OMNI 2• MEOWS OM* WII170 :arAnA• .1 O RI AZALEA MRTANA' IV lame. TDelf1 COreCN 1104, *411001 now S.R0ER11 1I 0101200. 00000110 1.0104710• M•14Lt De01*551 AL11 Ieme•11 X 0110041K4511 IOLL141 H04' 0 11041 0000.1. 10 0 41 emir. so■ NW MOSE MAO OR, K«. ON Me KRn d sus DM CAL O 40.1107040 11110 1 57)71! 100 • 10.5005711 Tau 41KV1wRTtuR, •te nnvw TR1ttLro R . 1 RRetR.e . PROR01 wr*e1 •TRAaet5RY TREE M' DK OR 11014.04011140111•1 WM, 10. rain.sroTm KOERS •LtMAD WY. AM, SY LA. 0111114. =WARM )P01µ 645 OR (00•0410 /1 ROL 00 PLANT LIST 010. •0)01(10 olR 01vp1 r ,!aw -'mow � -1°a°ER.-2_, nu�E ib ee 1RA1.11L4neb ALA. c0..t;T1_ ie7u4:ead - - •I- 10 r TEST •a FaReR1 0 • • AS 0 04 O D O • 0 0 0 O • n O 10 ORM•MAO) 01104410107100 • 10 X 05IX*0004 CAROL 71ACKT 01.74.101¢.x11 4100101 ALMA CCITACIA' ILEX COOL, WA., eX =VW, RD62D•• 11404401/ OR•CE0.1A 0140079 79040.01 7100AC1A• 4114,10• CAL•ORncA PR.* LAUCCtRAeua 11.,.4.01011E 4110110011.00.1 AM. KR01012. 11140000010•4144 1.1410.10 100101401 °AVOW Vt.." 14, ee•Na eOAawT 05001007,474 VOCA MOW • •140010:0 0.0 1040.05 4001514171.179 (MAY L1Dr 01AN0nA REMO 141101 LAIROC ..1 TKOS KR1N NAM C1 c*D0t* 0,000 0•0011101 4,4D 0710 :T aewut 14/01111. IOAL. 11410e0e00 ERR wen** I n41. 0)0■ LADY !Will 4 LAV0DER 1024. 10AL. ]RAL 104. 0.•n 015 col CMxCl ▪ 1• OR OR m11•14R R▪ IO Cd▪ TAKR S IP Ste e m e.e R▪ In CR (0.91044 841 .4 C0*?AKR A▪ ' OG JP CC 110. CO u•OG • '001 OG BulD0Rous, PS 1� 0 1111011. 111100414 l 12140/ PR Ciry of Tllk70a 171001ntenobtn Ave. Sn. TI/ h WA 75168 206.1310179 NeR Fete. Go! 51001 Clobin*Re 1250IRenebtn A.m. Se. Tukwila, WA 90161 1705 DC; Inc 55 11/05/02 ICJ 111 i 1 1 • 1 .line 1• 1;11 FTAA � t1.601. WB P0.16R IRMO MAC MAR if AM. 1.01.000 WPM Oa WM IWO* t1I 70 1 I ,• 1 I ruauwnn70rnr v¢fen� s e. PLATT L1. MTN mni%l r 1fi ' } 1iNi ^sr% -a7e , +.1.0 OAR MOO C•0221 N M T1 -7T 6eawse MO 00000.10101 '1�i r•_f M 1100110.1. RAOwnmm6 00101r, /0000 0000.1.1. ICtref IV ALMA WW1 I n■aB m 0.00.01 O. wn MnANTDpO 110000 MaAw166 10 1074 ••■•• ND 0070[00,1[ R•nRY1 O6RCUND GWGR PLANTING DETAIL SIIRUD PLANTING DETAIL 0.01 NW rov, Z ./It NM oxre �P GOLF COURSE • \- OPERATIONS OFFICE TRAILER- -- 1001011.1.0020 OVA OY:1T46711W4 NAnO. x Q' LIMIT 07 IAORK LIE 04.1 PAN. CARL ET °MOW, v 04.417ffinVejfinwalilirillbwAVAA 016 .seir A em CG Nir 1111. J' 'b}tFNBmcF iyR VEGETATION ALCM DTNEET /ROITAGC TO IRON OLEN NOTIV OPERAS". N-RU. TODD GRONO COTER AT DIDTWED MEAD 04 BERT DOE CP ORO KBTAT10H ALO• O STREET MONTAGE TO IRAN 1)1106 T0T10 O4IERYDt 04-1115. POW,. NED011 REPLHO06 NEDN, GROUND COATI AT 60 0*1D ARIAS OR T 60! Q ORM anNO.1 i�i , LANDSCAPE FLAN TR BOA 1.114711111%". mrsEI9LTML+00011.001G1LC�li l_ A�TLp1OF1 ro��°^' �°a[Rg0��'^^'��I11 11� • 6e TP .01201 City of Tao&B 17941 Intmnb. An So. 'rasa.. RA 9616E 8164130179 Nor - Porn 0,0 IAA. 433071 K I WO Interurban Amt.* Eo TAWS, WA 96166 1701 BC, DK 51/05/02 UNOSUPC PUN 1' =11- '0' 5.192 • 1.140 O W O R K 1.km • • !D!D LNW 11111 11/11! C C IRRIGATION LEGEND "MOM DE1Q•PTIC 4 DR3 rl0n[S 11M•M *a 471•776 tr LS WLA SS, 1.1n Dora POO mr•Rnn44 Russo* w- ..L.e.ar.• n. mks./ MIA M.TA• V% 11 Om 6160 ITIMOMPOT O 0.7.144 R. re. M ni3. 00.1. DODO ae/00 ••01/0 •0441MM4 V ar.M.. v• A! Ml.. 0 03 IMMIL.M. AMMO N.a 1. 041•044•10 -•• 0. MIMS M ▪ . t• .•.. Dee •A.eA* •r-.ML+T•.• 0.7.4440.1p ...a MIML ••••/LO m. ▪ PP0 CI Ca DO MOOR MOM 14••••• LLq • M 4L[M.l9 04 •d as= v4N rnntR SA.•.* •••••14/10 T IT•n[It 1 AMMO••••rtFRr DTAII •'510.4. IM MO •••••••••••• 0,I4 .A M.141 tV.ln Il• Al O 410 /a to.010 DIUM41 DITML-624 MINT ;AVM MO """ Y .Wim 07 0•T0 100•11011 MUM MUM. vAIM mmaND MD 414 mw f.IVKS MGR Ca1S11- rENM •a /1011 v4N -- lr Pm. 1Rle M Mop 0moli • d OUPITOMP•1010 fR MOM Jr Aw y40101 MM ALL •LI ML 0100101610AM IRRIGATION PLAN GENERAL NOTES L vv.1 TO M 47110CLIMIVO o WAIM000oo 11nWM,•MAI0 AT MT •1•10 OMT NOoircr a Am CASC MAIM. IL m•1ATIM Comucrc.• Rrt+.a• FM moments ALL MOOG pCgMlRD MSLR4 7K. 00 Cr M LDR IL ALL TC ran vAl•.a:•MDAT aeon 1u1•T NA1eM UVM MdaOR.LLOG SNM •ml•i*1 111NA•1... 0.1 mOrollit or MA/CM C040•00 • 1510•01-5, TO "M.a! ALL KC[.MEM ALLT 40 1710 • RIY*Y1.e6l1%bl•D014[l. R4 IMMO KC"GTLLT Id[AR001 LOT. MEMO 11/01D VTLM .• 0,00 LIAl*YM MGM • LOC. P. KA11 A111A1•M 6110•11 MOM 0M111[, ID ALCM .D.[. P oOW1O.OTC. I TOIM LITA12 S•An ALL WO[D mew. Lan14L LM. AM Mr FIT! • MOM., KAMM M11 ARM •MILD 0 • DM.. P.• 001 OM .D .* 0.110.11142 • MAIM M LAM ARM.01440 1. 1d MO MOM. *..[MEAT.. Ca 1111.01 • R•0*0Ll W .M m• 444100!101.11[ T I A•SrT 01•0010 LOM7101 OW COLD E. Va • P•10.04101, • nD.1Ard1P .10101 •111171 IO ID 101011,0 eT MOO. CIO Md CpTRaMD 1n MIA/ lOOACV.rRnrR1Y 10 • 0•Vl P ram oil Mob DM 0 D wPi1•sOM //MA R • MI/ .G. Laura 747.40.10 MOO COWL= M. moo MR LTW ..0 AMA flMCS SAN 6401 Md A10MMCt. • L Cr *0 ... 10 DP lief City of Tak•11 13901Inlmr40 Ave. Se. Tak.il, WA 9116! 206 - 4330179 N.. rO>M Golf Links O,DMam. 135,x1 Inor•A•n Are S0. TWNa WA 91165 1701 011 11/03/02 IIW CATION PLAN 1' =x20.. • ft Vittletntli 1111111■1101 KY. f vf•tr •aft 02f ASTIY letattfll Mt Mtn I .1 nrft1•0 .otertft Irrlf GLOM 1.1411/ /81.1.06 KAMM PM Mt, LtIT CP DOAK Ork71:37Arer-- -•• 1 ) , I • I I. • '7;71 ‘CICI I I CiC C:C, ; j CC cici I 1 :CIC! cicl IC:C y , cic : C C • • I . . : ! " . ! ' CXI 1 I 1 !CIC Cici 1 i 1- • 1 k L • ! I CiC ! I ! ! ! .1.•••■■ • „." REPLENIEI4 PULO4 • CROWD CORR AT DISTLRECD MBAS ON WEST IN= OP CMS % LIMIT OP WOW LW RERUN'S,* PULC17 GRAM COVEN At DISTUREIED AREAS CH SrAT MR CP CURD CG IRRIGATION PLAN 111.6170 44PPOLT "4"■••': 1-t1-1% • TORPOl• P.ONNOL90,1, PA teswerrm.e..e. City 1:4Tc/wile 13900 Intemben Me SI Td twat. WA 911165 206-133-0119 D▪ e+ Fem. Goff UWE. Clubtwesse 1.1500 Intrntrben Ave. So. T4Ib,WA 98154 IRR- IGATION PLAN 1" • 73.0. (3l 1 C1'N SIIV1f1O NO1IVJfIOI PP wn =WO 1::3.^10 4'6111IGJNYl./ 11.03.11114 ` 7 `.rnlw 101111010 sr w311ro 0.1.70.1161.101 n 0011 u•0.000 7 10300 i. o 007,0.01 1...Y.n 3• 10010.07.30311. WI a.iOi. 6.r•7 071•74.031.11 00073 •• 019000 0. a .01000.0.7001 31.w 111610 001107.I00401 0` .0. W 10 3 'C 1000 Na101.•001.11vN1v2 0.41 . 000 716010 Oa 700102 1001 11w11101.m a.. of 10017.401 a.°10.00001000..a 11301 an 710.7 a a 0700 000 3013 •11 WOO.. 00100 30..,.0 Wray 01.010.14 '. .l 100.10 OIINI. II. 1 00111OA .i0 •i1101 00•0 .1 '1171000.1301 X 1_ .. Y.]Ol 30.1 1.771 ro 04•474 17-44,47.4 10000.07.707.1011 ww N1107a�0011 /00064.31• 00.01. 11•10.- .O. 700000 00.000 30. i* Oan N 1043 .1443314 7.1.600.040671 TIM . Y1a 7.002 11.177/1170 0111 7aMaYD.00 0 1°30•1110 TIT 1 u lti 000010.1107 0000 r 300..002 1w.au x • Lw O1� 70001600 10iwIP Ml. ALP sau 0100 000 • 7-441 0711.0lW O 10000100 h 011JY 1 s31ON 1171113N3V t(a110LLLN00 1W1OW 1104 O 10000 0.1 04.7710 TIP 060 vi40 7 .4144. lba.■ Noma. 67 .0.0 vs 4,44 711000•70P10 0000 60 00 017. OPS 0•10•071 .007 -00,1101•100 114-014 all000 0.0 101070 M 0101117.4 w ▪ pm Pow.. auw%••7■00 r,l 00.1010 0110 .. 1117011 171.0 0070 100 0101 1311.133 0..17..0 001 1•0101 0031 0 O (Dev 00 .l 1 97 •O 4'x. Y •3110003141400 01 004 0�m O• 7:301'0i'a a '•10'33 4 '1b A.ul..-10.@30...710..... GO 10 0 633x'.01'.4401'F' 0.7 MAL X 1 b.0.• W. Na GYO... 031•.6 air. 11'.0.10701 .0.1. 011 .03.0 a.wn''*413 . 01 0 0. T• 7rx '.b • 1371 u..0 0 vat • nv 317..0 Q9 ®o• 10.1 60•70 OW.. w 10_0 020.0 mm1 1 0..1..0701 3 ..1 W.m. 006101. 0sw.0 000000 ..10,3[11`171 NIA 04111'.30 00 1) 14 .40 30344331330 10112 CN30J31 NOI1V')li `1l 330100. NMVI O 713:7-----4- 3Nl I.101n y.. 11404 lr 7131 te .7. 01.000 HOLLY-1051 aNIINx171IVW 0 OV7H PetlalB .40.4-130 aAlvA 1Oa.INOO 00001333 O aA1VA 3331501 2A1VA ?000.4607 X171(10 O 711VW3H03 `;tral 01•.30.,1 Or 17010 061 70001 POLL.40 .1 RECEIVED /AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • • • • I• I• • shit 1 1 1 1 • PROJECT AREA •I • (typical) t ego 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o, EXISTING PROJECT AREA 1 250,000 sq.ft. II 5.74 acres 1 PERVIOUS AREA , 116,260 sq.ft. 1 • 2.67 acres 1 IMPERVIOUS AREA 133,740 sq.ft. 3.07 acres ♦_ aft 0111 Toe •— 257•eq:ff'. ,° `, 247 ea at. EXISTING CONDITIONS, EXHIBIT "A" rm 1 1 1 it "NO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • ■ ♦ ...1 II 1 • PROJECT AREA (typical) 12.521 aq.ft. 0.29 acres 1 1s. 803 sq.ft. 0.02 acres 1 1 1 1 1 0.02 acres PROPOSED PROJECT AREA 250,000 sq.ft. 5.74 acres PERVIOUS AREA. 100,152 sq.ft. 2.30 acres IMPERVIOUS AREA 149,484 sq.ft. 3.43 acres 1 0.20 acres 258 sa.ft. 908 ag. f.r' 0.01' ocres.' 0.02 acres.; 0.01' acres,' RECEIVED 'AUG 16 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -- - - = -- ------- - - - - -- sae. - -- PROPOSED CONDITIONS, EXHIBIT "B" RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY jF Mjo tih- �JRREVELOPMENT EXISTING POND NCI CONFIGURATION Scale — 1"=40' v. 41, c 14 Oft s. 13.1 N71 x; 'EX x 12.4 r . r- POND MAXIMUM EL: y = 12.5 x 13,7 x ` x 13.5 12.7 '3,4 0 1L6 �+- x 114 x X x 12.5 . ' 13.7x) x 15.3 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002) COMMUNITY C DEVELOPMENT fF 4710 10 '19 EXISTING POND CONFIGURATION Scale - 1 " =40' N.q 13.1 x� x 13.4 la x 7 f EXIS URFA POND MAXIMUM Eire/ = 12.5 x 13.6 11.5 0 11:6 x 11.4 goo y�(�,t • f/ x 13,7 ,b, x 13.5 -142 x 153 BUSH, ROED & HITCHING C. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS "4"..., 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 """....'° (206) 323-4144 FAX (206) 323-7135 BRH 1-800-935-0508 JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE I'TJ PotirD ,3 ts.) 7q 4—) C2.— tr) 6 Si 7.2 - to-14 le) 372, - ToTAL CoE,PTi-k) / (i t) t '7 1/t .0) 814 3 4- ,24-c.;15Z. / 2. ( 12...4 SS‘10/ 2,(t..o)= "T" 0 T \10 E k cA) RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY FIEVELO pAnnicr 7111-1/Cinnie RIleets17415-1102441711 RECEIVED AI iG 16 20021 c°MM14 "'TM 'ROPOSED POND DEVELOPMEN CONFIGURATION cz) Scale — 1"=4-0' , 9Q 12<6.C(6.47157,6\ ue' 6. 6. Co , c co+ C 0 11 114 (4 p \Q2:1 SIDE 13 X i 13.1 EX" X 124 ■ 1 '3.4 1,6 0 FI-T Olaf FACE ELE ry rr 0 0 SU 11,b 1 :-12 - - -X 12,5 X 11 BUSH, ROED & HITCHING C. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 Minor Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 ••••""". (206) 323-4144 FAX (206) 323-7135 BRH 1-800-935-0508 JOB • SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE N oc,c0 ?DN.) r> 0 tsu s ( 001700:R- Ala ta- e-s, I (-ev lo tlz- 424 (s IT. r7EF.rt-i) 12.7-700 2216S '16225 1.'2.&41, to.) 4 et \ /.. t:) .7, 5 V72.. dr. v1tJ 7-0 S34 Z PRODUCT 204-1 (Skittle Sheets) 205-1 (Padded) 4, RECEIVED AUG 1 6 2002 COMMUNITY nFIJPLorman- II. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY The City of Tukwila requires that site drainage for proposed developments meet the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The King County Core and Special Requirements are as follows: Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location The existing on -site storm drain system and discharge location will be utilized for these improvements. Currently, all stormwater generated by the clubhouse compound and associated parking drains to the Duwamish River after passing through A 36" pipe and the retention/bioswale. Stormwater generated by these improvements will be collected by a new conveyance system that will discharge into the existing on- site conveyance system. The existing discharge location will remain the same. Core Requirement #2 - Ofisite Analysis Please see Section III for the off -site analysis. Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control Flow control is not required for these improvements. Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System The proposed stormwater conveyance system will be designed to effectively convey the 25 -year peak flow. See Section V for conveyance and backwater calculations. Core Requirement #5 - Erosion and Sedimentation Control The following measures will be installed construction to prevent silt -laden stormwater from leaving the site and being transported onto adjacent streets and property: • Silt fencing will be located along the downhill perimeter of the disturbed areas. • Silt protection will be placed on all existing and proposed catch basins. • Rock construction entrance will be installed. • Sediment Pond to retain runoff. Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operations All proposed storm facilities will be privately owned and maintained by the City of Tukwila. Core Requirement #7,- Financial Guarantees and Liability Financial guarantees are not required. Core Requirement #8,- Water Quality Water quality will be provided by the enhanced retention/bioswale. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMPKIT • III. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS Storm runoff flows through the existing retention/bioswale and discharges through a pipe under the dike into the Duwamish River. A flap gate prevents river water from flowing into the swale area during peak flows. Public Works/Surface Water crews maintains the piping system and the golf crews maintains the bioswale. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IV. Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design The existing retention/bioswale has been aceepted by the City of Tukwila as an acceptable method of water quality for this facility. Sizing guidelines have been established through previous design efforts for this utility. The proposed expansion is based on that design methodology and is being expanded accordingly. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 DEVELOPMENT • V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN In accordance with section 1.2.4 of the 1998' KCSWDM, the proposed stormwater conveyance system has been designed to effectively convey and contain the 25 -year peak flow 0 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 DevEL OPM NT VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES; See Appendix B for Soils Report, and portions of the TIR prepared for the original Safeway store development. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VII. OTHER PERMITS No other known permits are required for the'development of these improvements. 1A RECEIVED 'AUG 16 2002 COMMUNJTV DENEL,PAfixe r VIII. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Currently, runoff generated within the proposed construction area is collected by a series of catch basins and is conveyed via underground pipe to the retention/bioswale for water quality treatment. The treated stormwater then exits the site through 36" pipe'and enters the Duwamish River. To prevent silt -laden stormwater from leaving the site or entering the on -site storm system, silt fencing, catch basin protection, a sediment pond 'and a rock construction entrance will be installed during construction. Silt fending will be located along the downhill perimeter of the disturbed areas. This erosion control measure will allow stormwater to pass through it while retaining sediment and silt on -site. Silt protection will be placed on all existing and proposed catch basins. This measure will keep sediment and silt out of the downstream system. A sediment pond will provide a place for stormwater to collect and settle before being conveyed off -site. The rock construction entrance and truck/wheel wash basin will provide an area for construction trucks and other traffic leaving the site to remove dirt that may be picked up by the tires. The limits of clearing and grading have been delineated on the erosion control plan. If no work will be performed on a specific area for more than seven days during the dry season (May 1 to September 30), or two days during the wet season (October 1 to April 30), it will be protected with a temporary cover. Dust control measures will be implemented if a traffic hazard is created by sediment that is being transported by wind from the site into the right -of way. There are no known on -site areas that pose an erosion hazard due to steep slopes or soils conditions. 11 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IX. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES, AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bond Quantities attached. 1, RECEIVED AUG 1 G 1002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL All proposed storm facilities will be privately owned and maintained by the City of Tukwila. Public Works/Surface Water crews maintain the piping system and the golf crews maintains the retention/biofiltration swale 77 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPENDIX A Included reports: 1. Geotechnical Report prepared by Landau'Associates, Inc., dated February 2, 2001. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us 41 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 5' 772 ac.z,F Li/V/45 cO (//SHo ci s e LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. �3 Sal) f )U7AiR ,4v S•, 7v 4(i4/C-4 cti4 9 g /68 iDsrecei 46. vbo 3 0000 rj Quarter: SW Section: 1 4. Township: 33 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 13a006 t %Z t T /iZeZ%a%L Of Pec Address: l2 4 2'¢' — 4 Au. Coe •, 7l) W/ 98/68 Phone: 20 ' 76 7- 2343 FAX: 206 =7A7- 234t/ Signature: G: \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: g/t .)16L RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: F0(9. — op2 c7 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number:77i�-z& ,� o - ^ D/ ED Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: Loa -04 o NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 5' 772 ac.z,F Li/V/45 cO (//SHo ci s e LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. �3 Sal) f )U7AiR ,4v S•, 7v 4(i4/C-4 cti4 9 g /68 iDsrecei 46. vbo 3 0000 rj Quarter: SW Section: 1 4. Township: 33 Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 13a006 t %Z t T /iZeZ%a%L Of Pec Address: l2 4 2'¢' — 4 Au. Coe •, 7l) W/ 98/68 Phone: 20 ' 76 7- 2343 FAX: 206 =7A7- 234t/ Signature: G: \APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: g/t .)16L RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted in a later timely manner for use at the Public Hearing (e.g., revised colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED, TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 Department of Community Development and 206 - 433 -0179 Department of Public Works. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning Information Waived PbWk /Ping Office Use Only Comments & Conditions. APPLICATION FORMS: 1. Application Checklist: one (1) copy, indicating items submitted with application. 2. Four (4) copies of supporting studies with original signatures and license stamp as needed. 3. Complete Application Packet: Six (6) copies of application form and full sized plans, one set of all plans reduced to 8.5" by 11" (High Quality Photo Reduction) and other materials and information as specifically listed in Project Description and Analysis, Site Plans, Landscape Plan and Elevations. 4. SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) and fee ($325). PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 5. King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject lot. SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. 6. Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. See Public Notice Materials. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks must be included). SUBMIT ONLY IF UNDERLYING PERMIT REQUIRES PUBLIC NOTICE. A 4' x 4' Public Notice Board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. PROPERTY INFORMATION 7. Vicinity Map with site location. 8. Surrounding Land Use Map for all existing land uses within a 1,000 foot radius from the lot's property lines. 9. Title Report -- Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record, ownership, all known easements and encumbrances. 10. Lot lines for 300 ft. from the site's property lines including right -of -ways. G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE .APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • City of Tuk' ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 8 '- ( -6'12 Cl/ Applicant Name: f3 Street Address: City, State, Zip: f, 4 rg 4 .,sv i t . Telephone: 60 r ' , DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 RECEIVED AUG 1 e' 2002 COMMUNITY City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 .YES; Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 s„Y.----- ES) Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 1$ 06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. r `' ',...NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. OContinue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NQ Continue to Question 6 -0 - 7 --` , YES -continue to Question 6 -0 January 15, 2001 RECEIVED AUG 16 -9007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tu7wila ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete YES, Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. (NO)Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan,. BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 YES ontinue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) (YES ) Continue to Question 1 -4 RECEIV January 25, 2001 ED 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of dada ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. if your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES) Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) OYES Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 (YE Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 (YES) Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES; Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. (NO ;'Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 RECEIVED AUG '-6 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tula ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis/channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width o,'a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, rconnected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvnile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations acid permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish Rifer that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made/Or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition/that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question/3/-4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve"a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross- sectional arearis defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue/to Question 3 -5 YES - Contuiue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis; debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and,broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. / NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 RECEI\ January 25, 2001 ED AUb 1 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tula ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black River rbut do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the . watercourse or rivet that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor w6uld be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described inCooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the/Purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 , 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, i-ip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question/4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) RECEIVED January 25, 2001 AUG 166 2002 COMMUNITY STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: roS te.R CooLF L NHS C4-U (31 -I-OL) SE 4 F- cov as € l Mpp_oVEm 2. Name of Applicant: 822CrX FGETc0 --122, 'Dr (2AtzT02 71)V-col (-A pM2ie-s fi pe-c VE T 3. Date checklist pyepared: 3/i /2cX:)2. 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): COp5T1ZUCT1 O(.) QEGf NN i,)6 3 II /03 , NG 4A /04- 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NORM AFL. C STRucTioN 1 K1/..i Tb 6(,F Co02SE IAA s TER- Qt,4 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Mil STEP- P1-4-N.1 '5E-PA Af P(RavA - Ccx)0 -5t✓ AAS1 -Y2. • 2 6oLF 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. G \APPHAMLANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, O6/16/00 RECEIVED 1 AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Bo1LP1k6, C(.EM21N6 k ,NbC N'CAto t-U iceG SIGN l vt Ow, Stp1k , ST avA 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. CoNSTR ocrakc c F- 14, 600 5P cuiPoffousE, co ¢E1u avAL aF E1ctST1N6 3 -sToR'( Cc.U&( -4ousE ASScCtA -'C Pk)1GP1N6s, A(-i 11otJ of OW CooR &E 5 tzeEN5 MEA-2 M T 12 D 'S T Ucruf.€s 4 Ksew 28G 1't i i tJ (7 T "E. €T7'1 NCo . I '`cV . 20 ° Ste' (2 TA. ti T-4. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the Z°:)c's S F Mc8i1 Nilsa precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot 9-0004 • number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 1 3 5bo . S., foST GOLF (-1 t 3 FARGO.- 00o3ooao4 7• 5w (4 23 ,4- 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? G:\A PPHAN\LANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 RECEIVED 2 AUG 1 6 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat ollin: hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: (5 T� N( foo(� Gov 2s E stA CH-T V PZi ones 0•1 To toocc,R - `f . Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3.7 In o N Ao,\ Acer.r- COL (2.5€- c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland SANT) -( 5(i.T (&4L Sd.tJ1)(s1M) MDIUM SAgan(5P d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the inunediate vicinity? If so, describe. SS (6N � A SDi L IY 5 Repo IND ICa -"(t- 71+E Nae- ES A CAreecp.`1 RANIriN6 Fog LI ROFFACii Nt 5OScepf'(eju.+Tti e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 8000 G`{ OF F(LL i I� ?4 GY of GUT. eUIGDING ANo SUR- 0.00NCJING AX To J3E- pi (.(,gyp Tb etEVA-11 o N '2-0, o ' To BE 3avG" I oo YeArg. Ft-oo} P -P - • G :\APPHAMLANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 3 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. E c)5to r1P-j occvrL pu (Z.I.N& F'U-1t c W oQ & ivT TlP4E of CANSTaucriot4 . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? (�NT\f - SITE t S 60,E A teES . GLu f, 4oQSt— PA z .1 1.36 LoT W t LL Co'J R. Pto-ox l IN" A- `->! c "%cn OF C S t �• h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: STAN' ;44(3 TEC. N r up-e-5 , ( CLUQ( Nc, n2.0 s I oN cop. 712-0t., Ft'No(IJ6. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NoR. AM tuST ?M sot L PLAelrwlENr cT1 11-1 S, Cot ST. cHIN `f EXFhA, JS j . FINPvt. O Do(. S W tu., 6e- t-P-oM 12ES"1 wn2l I C'AolelN6 ?Cti-A -O ST, Vet I cu(-4A EXH1 tS T NI P4PK I NG C-07 t GO (.F C rsefzS EXHAv .ST b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. RCtJDe" .1 06 • PC.4 JT TD TFf-e EAST Elm ITS S ODaR.S R--i Tom' CoURSE UNm. c�"'R -neuty W 100 cow)! iIoNS C•\APPIJAMI ANIl11CP .1 PP \CFPA APP INN' M /1h /M RECEIVED 4 AUG 16 200? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: tJaME 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. pu WArMH 1514- (-( VER 50P ERs 114E-- S tTE" otJ T fh 5(DES) (r FLoos (NT° ELLtOT' Y 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. RE- coF i)i me 4 7 PANS m,r}. op ci s (1 f U Q l k (rK • (,o-r * SPA -N51 oN 6F eV ST1NCX 'pl2e�t NA-Pc� FPrGtt..A- 1 W (LC_ GE w,--0.+/ rJ 2oo' - Tl-4-g D VwA mot! S 1--4 P4 V e 12 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NoNe- (:1A0P14AMI ANTI ICF ePP \CFPd APP neie ( J! Kinn RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 5 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. YES , PLEs e 5E 5 if p(.AtJ 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. S*Tb w Av Z o tv� --'f b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ALt -TtoNS 1/41 LC- P f Q t9-0 (I ) (2410t..10 lNA-TM 15SUC- 5. G \APPHAN \I.A NDI100 APP \SEPAAPP.DOC. 06 /16 /00 6 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT •. • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No e'rjr1c. t5(Z s t r 11. pea._ 5 Y 5 itw s p t2o p s c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Sibiz)A4 W A-TM Coudercf low $tiSTtwl W t (,C RC DE (D Co uC C 5`lbLM W AMYL kT EX 1 ST1 rJb o(-F- t'f C 1 `n9 5 tbp5 . EX (s"T11■6 112-e- TM T w t u. R,6 ,eNt.0- (z6 Tb ACC MO 'ME n 1 Mpe1L J(o(s Af2c4r A;ND c(rt"1. Sf-I-of' ' 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. W AvT t S TV-Pt—Thrip I N l .TE12e Tri A A A T F61.10 . (NiFl LTRA�t"1 of (S poss t 131.x. Ui Alw2- 1'N Ft ow S (N" ° Dow A-M 1 S f-} p-(v EfZ . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: PP -opER Go LcEZTI o N 4 T'R +- i lvtffNi j F' - �(r� of TUIGWa 5-nelk o s touS AG (- EFME-Ns I -, r.. nn•r••w• •MINI C nm Ctn• •nn ONC/I lnn RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? O ASKS G.R.p.SS, S4 {- uBS , DwoopS �p5 Fir G LTA .4 D PAt (N7-, Lm T pAO • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: use NfrftTIyE FIG `TD (NI(I2E wAT UsE� CofuzecT- u5ts• of Tie;✓ l+J PAvrQ244-I (Q6 Lo T rlb ELI (xi i ATE 5UCKLI N6 arp SptiT• RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Deciduous tree aide kt a.1= aspen other )A t(._ -Shrub Ev reen tree: • S: pine ether r2tjWbb)' Grass Pasture Crop or grain We nts: cattait buttercup, bulrush, kunk cabba other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? O ASKS G.R.p.SS, S4 {- uBS , DwoopS �p5 Fir G LTA .4 D PAt (N7-, Lm T pAO • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: use NfrftTIyE FIG `TD (NI(I2E wAT UsE� CofuzecT- u5ts• of Tie;✓ l+J PAvrQ244-I (Q6 Lo T rlb ELI (xi i ATE 5UCKLI N6 arp SptiT• RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other heron, eagle, ongbir. , other: eer bear elk, beaver, other {�Z ..BRITS ass, almo , trout, herring, shellfish, other: UNV-(s . N OMK.NOU)N b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ERZSfo1.1 NiR.O. FENDING 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (lectric t . oil, meet the completed project's energy needs? Descri ee w heating, manufacturing, etc. ELECAN A(C FOR._ pc u3CtZ , GAS C2 t'3 D SMoKeR FOR CooKs N6 , solar) will be used to ether it will be used for CooK(N�; G: W PPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 Agency Comment ?AU tqA- 96ti) tveor" • &e` -P646 ietiv-ol RECEIVED 9 AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY OEVELOPMFN' • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment: b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. •a• IU(C G Si-A-00 W00C,(� 5OI ct-4 fE20DE12.71-1 LINE c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Ca>u•A put P-NCE (fit 6Thf ST NR-Cc • 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 0 1,5E . 5Ta 2TO N 6oC F CA-215'. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Art-e- L PARTNth T Fot2 1 E.Nrci getPoN9C (7oC,tc,e- FOR em ( SP0IVSg' 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: \APPHAN \I.ANDUSF. APP \SFPAAPP f OC 06 /16 /M RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY In DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 712A( o N ^l" f•-1012-71-1 � T rP-orw- r1 '' (QE, F4G( EE"-ST (2-e [ S I N APp zoisH PA--} mf- Bof I t1/416 Ft A-( ri.i(' t-T) 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. T''. Co tssTe..0 Gz1 o(`( P.,c--f (V (T'1 Lor1/4-)6 - ,(„t; - wtuSVG F-'-4 REST)RA.► T Ci 00 T) 00a. pA-Ti o - p Pt &I-Elm fog GOGFE& 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NoN6 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 5 I ICI CoOLF C'oUP -SE ADT : T2ESt�EN rok-tom # GuuTT - FA4tl Ly P —lam 4 R(DE (T-t s 4-op s b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT SINCE Coo(,F GdJ2Sg Oi S LT I N 192S- G.4APPHAMI.ANDUSE APP\SEPAAPPDOC. 06/16/00 1 1 RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments �L1 ' c. Describe any structures on the site. -(r Q J400 2 Smp c / se `ei ( , MAsar ,1 +W?sbOPM 0( . MA NT• oFP10E - 2 S'NRAI Wo07 F12, W f3(,)6 L% Og.r. GM E' (• M t N T . S 1*1) - C S -R-ki (Ai S) r•A (-Q A N ?0 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Art,C- THREE E F L)1 L-t 1 •6 5 W t (A., T3 F Re M,ov e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ■ (": \APPHA \11 ANTl11SF A PP1SFPA APP 011f IWl/Jrv) 17 c/t.s Lt�(Z 0 /ba4" RECEIVED AUG 16 Zoo? COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? IG - 28 STAN( RANT elkei S 4 -L 2- ( cup Goup coURSf ENPGo ( Agency Comments j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No PC k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Note" 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Awtl, Ube- Acs PlasU l 005 - 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? No Ne- G \ APVFIANN.Ar'a)us F. APP\SFPAAPP INN' O611 ran RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment: b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Naf` -- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: IvaNC' 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? (ZltloC 1-o' , WoC sit)1N6 + ST0N6 Gf41 v".% NCB 4 2'. & o c .F c.oj (LS Is N Tl N 6 -- 40 ' 4- {-c't-1 A--La N 6 (' Ffr12WAA/ b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N T nK6 41,0N6 f sue—' 4,Ac4 --1 (Ai U Sr V l S t 5L-e- f j2- rM M U LT 1 P4-01/44 l c.‘,/ C U/ Nb AG RoS 5 I NTOLU v\-16.1•1 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: SP-AciN6 Wda0 Poc,E'S FULn1t ApP42 -y US 1 N6 1:3(4 4‹,14 coc,oRED NET{'t N ( . r.,.DDUnnnr OMInt ICC •DD\l'FDA a DD n/V` run unn RECEIVED 14 'AUG 1 6 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELO?METT Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? M(tJIMA -c G M !sett. accorz, F-R-oM {Z ce-c t Le4, 42-1(.1 G ON T o(LDINU r) vti( C.EtP -1) 1 i� M rAkt2K -(nl GO (N l tic. i3 t. l-r- ove .N 1 (0t -f-r. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? U tilt..( Z� • 5CIR.b(N 6 12 —F (S 1)4(2Itt -M. t taN— R.EFCEOiIQC �uR ' , pARft.(N6 or L(6HIS WlL(' CIE 54-telpeP T A V o r o se 1 Lt,46.4s€-• c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? U V,■V(30 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Ski (EZ-i) €'P 1. (6t}-T R$ 1 (Z S i i1/4A I N 14 (2e• (, (G {-} -("- OV S p t t.(. ©N r 11/4D j • CTILcrrr . , t M2 Y_ p rrJ 71v€ - oF. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Foy` - (A �o CsbQ&.S€ B 1 G1/4-tGc pA-7 - Art.oNt. / N1 -z1k,U NR f (R-j 7) T -r u 4.1 vor. calm M u 11-(ti( c- Thrg. G:\APPHAMLANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 Gam. frok RECEIVED 15 AUG 1 6 2002 COMMUNI7X fF' /F! flnser.•. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Would the ,proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Agency Comment 6(114,1 P- ✓ -(Yam W u.t -To 01 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. FOSTER 71=2-E6- • PI o ,T (S i-oca p I F091%-r- f o O to Rntet, 4 op-46 (N M ArL T T? € P seN i P •-1 M R. FoSTC (L o�A-�. 4 S ort -v t 0f F (GU rie- 1 '114 C L- &-'t ( Soo t s . o*e . ace (,c SJ O "moo fluDE s ON C.1-Cr Ara f+iS7b2tC COAL S(GNIF(CA(JT $0 /(.0(N6S • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. S t T (5 N .sow TRE A .t , 6 - eaera,u Or2 '`eniNbGP-44 Fle' PE12.ioD CAuupS(?E. -3u-so t3OcU INcs Mkt (3€' +- IISTa2(6 , F3v 1 t csTl4 13U(c.DIN6S Araks- LETS-S ok rJ Sa - G o o c-o ( 5 o }-i ( Sm (U c1031PicANGC Is ow-t `71. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: ppiciFessroNAt., A(2C44 At✓Ol.06 (S7' w6 116. r t'o RI N 6 A( c4iNkit S hoc eP 14- ROSR ., fib NtEsitika / (mac r r-t a N s 17E- 'i- . off_ ao(c,O(tiSS wcLiL ALL QC tZ t D . G \ APPHAN\LANDUSE..APP\SEPAAPP.DOC. 06 /16/00 16 RECEIVED AUG 16 200 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. P9-6,..1t-e-4- NQrs a I-) N 1L R.o R3 A N ASV . .0Q-Fiti 1 NHS 1)4-.M" g 4 455- Po k-c,6o Aij Arc T To T+ P° Pk. fLT"1 • Accec5 Lt tom, (3 y rife, co -T i12•9 i4 e).(3 CO t•ri.) 4-rL -\ t. •i ArL6N 6 (N --j L..) 11_ 4N b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? `iES • PA(2 -t4- 4 PA OE Goy mss S t'f' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? (vo Nom— (- S5 OF S?h-t'S d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). (J w F(9z CA e- /GMT- iscia-ouNo P)Oi14)1N6 oNU f. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. G:IAPPUANU.ANDUSE. APPISEPAAPP. DOC. 06/16/00 RECEIVED 17 AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT to Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comment f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 20 s-t7sah s x 3 Rou r4o 1124 es = sses. Ai7T' mAA/c . E511 MATe-D , pt=?W- ert,` f oc.cuR G NOON g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No■e 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. U N L 1 KCLU{ b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. ot• 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: natural gas efuse servic system other: telepho sanitary sewer septic G 1A1'PI IA MLANDUSE. APP \SEPAAPP.DOC. 06/16/00 RECEIVED 18 AUG 1 6 2007 COMMUNITY • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. N )ev c fJ sews , w A- ert, Vii, , Na7Ur Goats, �ort� -BAG€ , 7e2Et-bNE , (- t )e f F---(13612. r TMPvn 1 i booto 1 "i�tl t'- t CA NS't�Z0 c�l'1 b r€NS(0 N OF C )A-7 . 5`(s 7 . C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agenc e ying on them to make its decision. Signature: m>A,f\ ✓) A . Cc. A -ett(, , P wo' et_1- 17 i�-T"• Date Submitted: 8 4 (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). G \APPIHAN \LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP DOC. 06/16i00 Agency Commcni RECEIVED 19 AUG 1 6 702 COMMUNI rY OEVELOPMFNT TECHNICAL: INFORMATION REPORT for FOSTER GOLF LINKS CLUBHOUSE IMPROVEMENTS located at 13500 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH TUKWILA, WASHINGTON prepared by BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 MINOR AVENUE EAST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 323 -4144 (206) 323 -7135 FAX BRH JOB No. 2002042.00 July 25, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Overview II. Conditions and Requirements - Summary III. Offsite Analysis IV. Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design V. Conveyance System Analysis and Design VI. Special Reports and Studies VII. Other Permits VIII. ESC Analysis and Design IX. Bond Quantities X. Operations and Maintenance Manual APPENDIX A — Additional Reports I. PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT NAME Foster Golf Links, Clubhouse Improvements. PROJECT LOCATION The project, Foster Golf Links, is located at 13500 Interurban Avenue South, in Tukwila, Washington. It is located in Section 14, Township 23 East, Range 4 North and is, generally, located east of the Duwamish River on the north side of Interurban Avenue. This facility opened for play in the spring of 1925 and was operated as a family business until 1977 when the citizens of Tukwila purchased the course. PROJECT NARRATIVE This proposal is for the reconstruction of the golf course clubhouse and parking facility. The affected area of this development will encompass approximately 250,000- sq.ft., or, 5.74 acres. To accommodate the new construction, an existing retention/bioswale located within the first fairway will be enhanced. EXISTING CONDITIONS A paved parking facility serves several structures, those being the clubhouse, cart house, garage structure and a private residential structure that has been used as a residence and an office but is now unoccupied. The existing paving is in a general state of disrepair due to age, tree roots, utility etc. Storm runoff from these impervious areas is collected in a series of catch basins and underground conveyance pipes and is discharged to the Duwamish River via the existing retention /bioswale. The impervious areas to be removed by this project total approximately 133,740 -sq.ft. (3.07 acres), or, 54% of the project area. The clubhouse and residential structures are each served by a sanitary sewer stub which are tightlined to the sewer main lying within the Interurban Avenue right -of -way. A fire hydrant is located within the existing parking lot. PROPOSED CONDITIONS This proposal is for the construction of a new 14,614( + /- ) -sq.ft. clubhouse facility, new parking facility and incidental impervious surfacing. Storm conveyance will be revised and it is our intention to enlarge the retention/bioswale to accommodate this expansion. The proposed, impervious: surfacing (buildings and paving) total 149,484 - sq.ft (3.43 acres), or, 60% of the project area. This equates to a'-net- increase 'of 15,744- sq.ft., or, 0.36. acres. A new fire hydrant will be installed, the sewer stub to the vacated residential structure capped and the sewer stub to the old clubhouse facility will be extended to provide service for the new clubhouse. RETENTIONBIOSWALE RECONSTRUCTION A series of correspondence (for previously considered improvements) between city staff members is being utilized to determine the required increase in volume for the swale. Specifically, those pieces of correspondence are; • A memo from Mr. Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director to Mr. Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer, dated October 19,'1998 (memo 1, copy attached), • A memo from Mr. Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer, to Mr. Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director, dated October 21,'1998 (memo 2, copy attached), and, • A memo from Mr. Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director to Ms. Jill Mosqueda, Associate Engineer, dated August 20, 1999 (memo 3, copy attached) As noted in memo #2,, the existing swale was calculated to have a volume of 64,000 c.f. per Randy Berg. We have confirmed this volume as demonstrated in the attached "Existing Pond Volume" calculation. RECEIVED AUG 16 200? COMMUNITY - DEVELOPMENT 1 • While our numbers indicate a volume of 61,108 c.f., we are deferring to Mr. Berg's observation of 64,000 c.f for these purposes. Our calculations -have been based upon a client provided topographic survey, which, per industry standards, may have an error of up to %2 of a contour interval. As such, the slight discrepancy of our volume to Mr. Bergs ( ±/- 5 %) would be within acceptable tolerances. Memo #2 indicates a specific methodology for calculating the required volume in response to memo #1. In that memo, paragraph 5, Mr. Fraser indicates that "...The addition of 54,004 s.f. of impervious surface, for the proposed Golf Course and Maintenance Facility (35,004 s..f.), for the proposed City Petrol Facility at the George Long Shops (18,000 s.f.) translates'into 32,023 c.f of storage needed to meet the 7 day /100 yr. storage requirement ( for) these two facilities ". This equates to a detention volume requirement of 25,830 c.f. /acre of new impervious surfacing. RETENTIONBIOSWALE VOLUME METHODOLOGY Mr. Fraser further indicates in memo #2 that the existing pond volume of 64,000 c.f is over -sized by approximately 44,000 .c.f., which establishes a required volume for existing contributory areas of 20,000 s.f. This is demonstrated by his comment in paragraph 5, which states "...Since the 44,000 c.f of available storage at the pond is greater than the 32,023 c.f of storage required, technically, the available pond storage satisfies the 7 day /100' year storage criteria ". These figures were based on previously proposed improvements, which have since been modified. The George Long area, being approximately 3.52 acres (including the adjacent street and the adjacent lots) has a development potential; of 90% impervious coverage, or, 3.17 acres. Our pond volume calculations will anticipate those future improvements together with the increase in impervious areas being proposed herein. RETENTIONBIOSWALE VOLUME REQUIREMENT • Proposed impervious surfacing • • Existing impervious surfacing For a net increase of • George Long Shops Facility Fora total impervious area increase of VOLUME = 3.53 ac @ 25,830 c.f./ ac = 91,180 c.f total pond volume of 111,180 c.f. 149,484. s.f or, 3.43 acres 133,740 s.f. or, 3.07 acres 15,744 s.f. or, 0.36 acres 138,085 s.f. or, 3.17 acres 153,829 s.f. or, 3.53 acres beyond the existing 20,000 c.f required volume, or, a RETENTIONBIOSWALE VOLUME PROVIDED The existing retention/bioswale will be enlarged easterly to accommodate the increased volume requirement. It is our intention to maintain the existing geometry of the swale on the north, south and westerly edges. The swale bottom will expand easterly for an average of 50 feet at a grade of 1 %, then a side slope will be provided at 10:1 to an elevation of 12.50, the elevation at which the existing swale was calculated and field conditions indicate. The volume provided in this configuration would be 123,838 c.f., as demonstrated in the attached "Proposed Pond Volume" calculation. A RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FE COPY City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W Rants, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Jill Mosqueda, Associate Engineer FROM: Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director DATE: August 20, 1999 SUBJECT: Foster Golf Course Maintenance Facility- -Storm Water Plans This is a "heads up" memo to provide you some background information for our new Foster Golf Course Maintenance Facility. We submitted our SEPA checklist and building permit application last week. While preparing our site plans, I met with Phil Fraser twice to discuss how our surface water from impervious areas would be handled. Currently, rain water from a low area on the 17th and 18th fairways, from Interurban Avenue South in front of the golf course, and from our golf course parking lot, is collected and piped to a retention /bioswale pond area on the left side of the in fairway. As the water flows through this large swale area, it exits through a pipe under the "dike" and into the Duwamish River. A flap gate prevents river water from flowing into the swale area during peak flows. Public Works Sewer /Surface Water crew maintains the piping system and our golf crew maintains the bioswale. When the retention /bioswale facility was built (when Metro's 8' ETS line was put through the golf course), it was built larger than necessary in anticipation of the construction of our new maintenance facility. To provide you additional information, I've attached my 10/18/98 memo to Phil and his 10/21/98 memo of response. These memos were prepared after our two meetings and site visits. One major change that affects both the information in my memo and in Phil's response is that a decision has been made not to construct the petrol /gassing facility. This decision removes an anticipated 18,000 square feet of impervious area from Phil's calculations. With this decision and the fact that the retention bioswale is "over built ", we do not plan to enlarge the size of the pond. Please take this information into consideration as you, Joanna and Jim review this project. Please contact me if you have any questions. cc: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer Attachments: Memo from Don Williams - 10/19/98 Memo from Phil Fraser - 10/21/98 DW:nk(corresp /don /jillmem) EIVEp AUG 1 s III COM Mk6' 3 Ahnno• 1711AI 427_IR/1/1 • r-;,„ Lloll rg... /7/)ii A ? ?_!A ?? MEMORANDUM TO: Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director FROM: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer DATE: October 21, 1998 SUBJECT: Storm Water Facilities for Parks and Golf Maintenance Facility, Addition of Petrol Facility to George Long Shops The following is my response to your 10/19/98 memo for the proposed combined Golf Course and Maintenance Facility, and proposed City Petrol Facility at the George Long Shops---as they relate to the capacity of the drains in Interurban Ave. S. flowing to the north and use of the existing capacity of the bioswale /pond at the north end of Foster Golf Course which discharges into the Duwamish. The public drains in Interurban Ave S. (flowing to the north) to which you anticipate connecting the proposed facilities identified above have the capacity to take these flows. I recommend your site survey include the invert, top of pipe and rim elevations of the Interurban Ave S. storm structure you are tapping into to assure all your facilities can gravity drain into this system. The drawings you've provided don't identify the storm system nor connection. Also, I caution you that the elevations of your facilities need to be in accordance with the attached Flood Ordinance and lowest floor elevations above the hydraulic grade line of the storm pipe in Interurban Ave. South to which you are connecting. I understand that the 7 day /100 year storage requirements for new impervious surfaces for the Parks/Golf Maintenance Facility and Petrol Facility is to be met at the existing pond at the north end of Foster Golf Course. This Pond has approximately 64,000 cubit feet of storage capacity. (this material was placed on the 17th green and above the 100 year flood plain). During low flows/low river conditions, the bioswale at the bottom of this pond functions to treat low flows drain through it; and, during high river conditions (up to 12,000 cfs discharge at Howard Hanson Dam measured at Auburn gauge) /peak storm events, the flapgate between the pond and river shuts off backwater flows from the river causing storage of local drain waters until the river level subsides. From my discussions with golf course operations and maintenance staff, during these high river /peak storm events, the pond can fill completely and overtop back into the golf course greens and to the club ' house on rare occasions. From my discussions with parks and golf course staff understand this pond was originally built to provide water quality and erosion control during construction of the ETS pipeline and other projects. In that time frame, the only added impervious surface I found in this sub -basin is a trail/sidewalk fronting Foster Golf course on Interurban Avenue South. A conservative calculation of this additional impervious surface would at most require 20,000 cf of storage for a 7 day /100 year event, leaving 44,000 c.f. of storage available for other use. The addition of 53,004 s.f. of impervious surface, for the proposed combined Golf Course and Maintenance Facility (35,004 s.f.), and for the proposed City Petrol Facility at the George Long Shops (18,000 s.f.) translates into 32,023 c.f. of storage needed to meet the 7 day /100 yr. storage3 -- requiurement these two facilities. Since the 44,000 c.f. of available storage at the Pond is greater than the 32,023 c.f. of storage required, technically the available Pond storage satisfies the 7 day /100 year storage criteria. RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 DEVELOPMENT k4k4OL Although the 7 day /1001year storage criteria ismet with the existing pond storage, you should expect that the added flows will surcharge the existing flooding conditions at the golf greens and facilities during high river /peak storm events. Therefore, I would suggest that developing an additional 32,000 c.f. of pond storage is appropriate, and will result in fewer, less critical river back up / storage events. Also, I would suggest a mechanical opening device and active monitoring during high river /peak storm events to effectively manage this storage facility in keeping with requirements of the Green River Management Agreement (available in my office) to reduce flooding to the property as much as possible. Please send me a copy Of the final drainage plans when it is ready for review. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to,call me (Ext. 1641). Attachments (5) cf. Al Larson c: \phil \donwsdoc RECEIVED AUG 16 2002 COMMU DEV� OPMI NT • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 MEMORANDUM TO: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer FROM: Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director&. /Orv^� DATE: October 19, 1998 SUBJECT: Storm Water Facilities for Parks and Golf Maintenance Facility John W Rants, Mayor The Parks and Recreation Department is planning to build a new combined parks and golf course maintenance facility in 1999. We will need to handle the storm water generated from the roof and paved asphalt areas and would like your assistance in determining how this water will be handled. In addition, the Public Works Internal Operations Division will be constructing a new city petrol station on the west side of the George Long Shops. Our preliminary plans indicate we will have a net increase of 35,004 square feet of impervious area at the parks /golf shop. The gas station area will add 18,000 square feet for a total of 53,004 square feet of impervious area. We plan to design storm drain systems for each area that will connect directly to the storm drain line on Interurban Avenue that has lines that exist within the George Long Shop /golf course area. These lines will carry the water out to the Interurban Avenue main storm line that flows north into the entrance of the golf course and then daylights into a large retention bioswale pond along the left side of the #1 fairway. This retention pond has . a flapgate that prevents pond waters from going backwards into the storm drain system and a second flapgate between the pond's outlet and the river. The capacity of this retention pond was calculated by Randy Berg, which I believe was minimally around 64,000 cubic feet. Assuming we can utilize this proposed method of handling the storm water, the question is do we need to modify the existing piping systems or pond area? I will soon have a drawing to show the storm pipes that exist near the George Long Shops (which I think you have copies of) and our new drain lines for the maintenance facility. Al Spencer should have drawings of the petrol facility also. Are these necessary for you to proceed to make decisions and tell me what I need to do? I realize you're use to a civil engineering drawipwith all of the details, however, we're trying to save money and by doing some extra leg work we can save funding for our very tight budgets. Please contact me if you have questions or need information. I'd like to finalize our decisions within the next two weeks. cc: Al Spencer, Internal Operations Manager RECEIVED Wayne (vary, Architect AUG 1 s 1002 pi; M4O1 tw.ww.aw:a ,osua 7.1/7/Z. Ira.la.11,- NO, ,fflOpc. .=Zrof-L-4■4Milt. \ 7,17,1L,SLAMIL17.2 "=7111.J11,1•1472,-7PD,Na S.1.126,114....6715, ‘, zunverrmoss.„ \ \ \ \ -1=ww.OSICY.Sweif .e.s7.:Wwssc. 71:12.2,47C•••••2G "caresmenneces=sa.r^.■ .,ccesawww.orriesziasaust-w ,141(7..2.1,1126.15, .• LANDSCAPE PLAN -1114,11,, / —swarw-,,,,,,crwesr—a•-•-ww, 1 MB Waal PAW1702611V, 172311.7••■•TIX P7917/1•77 MUM .1•110117..111 •••.CLINNLYCHMIC11.0.1 • City of Tukwila 13900 Interoban Awe. So. TukwiLs WA 98168 206-433-0179 N▪ ew Fos. Golf Linki Clubhouse 13500 loterueban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 1701 D▪ K BC, SS 713/02 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN RE MID AU VS: c raniVNIIY oEvELOPIAIENT • (I 1 0 ('00000 0 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN rw4+6suanuawt ' S Iflb NSe' OetaGM 1.W41. rL,eSIAr IL S UVhiJ*Sl ..... Wt.WC+Jwuue v a r av b rat* RiST,..raaa.JI,.100..a2,,..T' Jaw.. 4L MNLFIT Y1WJ.'SVYMSW000 t.aa' tat&T.SR City of Tukwila 13900 Interurban Ave. So. Tukila, WA 98168 106 - 433-0179 New Foam Cdf Links Clubhouse 13500 Interurban Ave. So. Tav la, WA 98168 1701 ' DK BC, SS 7/13/02 VAT. Or PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN a/ of Tukwila N. Fern Golf Lieu auhlusa 13500 lawteurboo Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 911160 1701 KDD EJD ;719/02 Site Photometrics mu I 141911111...1 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 1./.111101101. mu I am ma mu ,ww▪ s BCH▪ mow ramairt01.111/COM IX110141 MO CMICIICIOR 1.0.7419J1M02 17; now .1 1 7•M WOMIIC0.0101 CUM= NANO 1.111.:••• ICIP1.1111.1•111 1•141IIIMIMA NY/013 IMF 271MfM.M 1/1•0111 SITE PROTOMEIlUCS 3•14•■■•• AUG 113-r. .commoym, ueveLopmewr ' < LAWASETOZONSO4 07/21/02010 a3: ow* CS) '3M Ntl821f831NI s. •s•`I'>!''N sx v• t '..,. \ a ' ..N. ''., - % •``.4... -e• CT- 0 i■•:',7) 0 0 , 171 • •••••■ • --- 0 , \ .4/4444 i • . • AA ) .727 • • r \ - 11.5 • 1J .09 • • ;X' SCHEMATIC GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA — FOSTER GOLF LINKS CLARK ARCHITECTS " I Ni WRY TUNA% A 'as WASHINGTON 0. BUSH, ROD & HITCHINGS, INC. PIK ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS ,":11111= ..`4".22`41401.1 0 . . - `.1 !,' •,,, r. al // , (,...--4.-----: • NO 1; .4 1 / 2 175 t, z ) 1WW410,101 I w Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department Foster Golf Course 1000 Ft Buffer: Legend TrYwNL City Wile . 1000 ha Whir- • e J l! ,. " ter-r -1\ \ ', -- -i r- i / / 1 ` T1 I 11 ' 1 _ �-'r -� ' "1 _IT:, '1- r — }_ `-- - -- - -4 1.' \. — f- - - -i t---; _ -{ i- -" \ P! 1r . 1 I __ \ r r-- r - - -7 �- 1.-7. u _ \ \ ,` nT'i H-- --1- it t�1 � 1 1-- �' \\ \T �1 -±-1-- , a� ,k -;-- t , _ \ , i - -J 1,� I) ,J \ , • 2 3 4 6 LEGEND riva.96.ro 1.1 • ■••• WM M. G., ■•••■•■•••••• 771 1 47; FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS 1St OF MS MSS ft1 MO NUM 530330/957 TUT VIZ Ilmouy Ar.7 pat LEGEND amm12.1ru.M.A. FLOOR PLAN •f. • ...r NOTES AREAS SIILLMO AN. 1.1/10.4 110. • Cir. of Tukulla 139001mvurban Avc So. Tukwila, WA 98168 206 - 433-0179 Ncr Frn.n Golf lint. C3ubll w,c 135001nrcru,b,n Ave. S,. Tukwila, WA 98148 1701 SS 05/14/02 FLOOR PLAN 1/8' = l'•0' nim ..ri. r •,' ..... ..r 1' ..'r • •. • •, r •cc,.. .•v.. r. Y-1. n.•Y < /A,\n Y vl � umrasulen e ION e 1 giii s J. ° ¢® © ® MA o � I I 8 n ®aa •••• ' — I 04, ® trIllb IN e �wKti ® L °� L ._o .at © >< (.2<1.>< ><J1 1J ><><1M . A >GI >"<I>< ", I .� o `- 4--- MM F-131>< 3I?G Da6< o tb v�r • . 14 ,. • r .�. 1 I c: I�/I �/� I/�II< / ><I> ID 4;. r. 1112 • CV • .>. �i .l0ay A 4; ,y :� ,a H ,., ..r ,..y�x�.,.�' s x „ LEGEND amm12.1ru.M.A. FLOOR PLAN •f. • ...r NOTES AREAS SIILLMO AN. 1.1/10.4 110. • Cir. of Tukulla 139001mvurban Avc So. Tukwila, WA 98168 206 - 433-0179 Ncr Frn.n Golf lint. C3ubll w,c 135001nrcru,b,n Ave. S,. Tukwila, WA 98148 1701 SS 05/14/02 FLOOR PLAN 1/8' = l'•0' nim • • Man 1-80,8,0 ROOF PLAN a 7 • 1 r 1111 Emmic Ciry of Tukuih 13900Inarurhan Am So. Tukwila, WA 98166 205 -433 -0179 New Fosler Golf Links Uubhousc 13500Inrerurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 1701 5S 07/02/02 0.WF PLAN 1/8' = 1'-0' A.401 WEST ELEVATION 4- 0'..SCA1 FOSTER GOLF LINKS /.1.00ineenentn.itr.o.,..o.. .c/TY OF TUKWILA • 11,1,11, •,o. 1111111,1.■ 14. 1•1.11 CITY OF TUKWILA Parics and Recreation Deportment • 12424 4!" I. nstoe .1.mok 11.1 FOSTER GOLF LINKS 13490 Inierwfian Avenue Saudi. Tirkusle 0'4 V..11),X.:331.2A R 11.371 i 11737 .:1". 236n. PLACE. FZEN-1. “81131.7,117 2;3 813.10377 %11NNi ri RLRII1Ir1 • Qty of Tulogla ' 13900Intemban Ave. So 'Tukwila, WA 98168, . 206-433-0179 New Foster Golf Links 13500Iniainoan Ave So. .Tukvala, WA 98168 . -. e>Q9TRG 1 ES - -. _ • PROTECT RO • • IN.AREA9 DI9 BY CCN&TRJCTION RO EED P L41114 N AREAS DISTURBED BY. CON5TRJCTION �'► .� r -_ ���� ice. ������ 20 van /Or Ar VOI JUL 0 0 00 — 1111w 1111ZRCG — ® !S OMEN A5M 5PRINGillOOD PH( WEATHER 1 " =20-0" 0'D m 20 OVGB 1..11 G102 • LANDSCAPE PLAN I! \�. II'• \ \ \R(11111, I" I'll City of Tukwila N Foster Golf Links'. Clubhouse ::.13500 Intenuban Ave. So. Tukwila; WA 98168 • it -. 1 0 o a 02 n 02 02 o ELIiLDUaG 1701 2/19/02 2- 521 .1 tio, FC 25 35 23 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE IMPNWASON TYPE , 01Y. 1 WPTYPE S30 .. ARM moutrrEo RECTILWEAR CUTOFF LIGHTING 812 - OUTDOOR POST - ROOMED FIXTURE 8U 30' POLE W717 POST • SITE PHOTOMETRICS 1" = 40,. -0" :., Site. Photometrics Seals: 1' an - RECEIVE! AUG .16 201 COMUNRr DEVELOPMERI DAVID A. ILAK1: ARCII 1K1S. rIJ.c Qty of Tulwila _,. 13900 Interurban Avc. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 :'. 206-433 -0179. , New Foster Golf Link . Clubhouse ' 13500 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila: WA 98168 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 0 2 4 b .' u.a\ ID A. CLAM. A .. .13900 Intcnirban Ave- So.: Tukwila,. WA 98168.'. 206- 433-0179 Ncw Foster Golf Links ©ubbouse .13500 lntcrurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 .`07/02/02. . AE • ;ROOF PLAN RECEIVED ,A8616 !0 i DA ID A. Ci 'RI aHCHI n.CTS, ruc city of Tukwila 13900 Interurban Avc. So.:. Tukwila; WA 98168 206133-0179 _ NewFosier Golf Links. Clubhouse:.... . 13500 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwia, WA 98168 1701 • DAC FLOOR PLAN LEGEND FLOOR PLAN NOTES AREAS A -101 ), \CIU A. CLARK ARCIiII LCIS, 1'I.LC 411i City of ScaTac .17900 Intcmadonal SeaTac, WA 98188 ' 206 -241 -9100 New SeaTac City Hall Valley Ridge RenovatDOT 4800 So. 188th St ` ScaTac, WA` 98188.:. -, 0102 RELOCATED ROOD - ea DAC .=MINIPS11.1.1 11.11.M1111 nnvm A. awi x PARKING DATA BUILDING INFORMATION 40.•1•-a. rm TOTAL - WA • ' TOTAL OWLDIG AREA 14,614 M. -..• A -101 iai6NU iaat : . _� RECENED I.• ti (SPECIAL PZR)OScioi+) pp818 2002 .,: LAI-0NI IN (SHORELE) • :I ....wan 5n02-IS4 (TRRK CVrrI NC) • LL1w S.•11. •• . PtCTTEO SCALE• I• • ON '$TORN DRAIN - DFTAR AT CL1)A - MUSE' LL CI RP 17.711. 11. ISA idoslar tow,u ms - LL I V 4 U' m/- /LADY nit LLTA•. L s• at Ctrigs [i S NNASIm9 AM, ACMD mTOE OAL t32.TRR2. OMV5R3, 'SPECSFSCATO.S PREPARED 10RS0M' 1 IRS .fAnvdl. 5Knr. 1 NAND • . SOY O 140[10* REASARE •O4 APE I NTR. =TS O 1002500NAe SERVICE MEMO FOR 0*-TIK UST. T* [vela PROJECT pPPENSATOM OOVaCD IN AROMA NwE.SRC Epn IS m.VERUL M WENT 'S 5*0. TO ASP. .050 AISSC4T[131 0U. *T.. Ara O 2ELD NAP.LCSS MD UNSI.9TT. EM tt!M INC.. Ant! Au. CLAM IAER MTIC LOSSES LIN WAGES. lAO T i. AMUSE. uP REUSE III OT1103 IN 1*. RAC I.05 READ K • '.M NIALIOE PGDAESE D0 0.1 MIA USE RS N ET 00141 TUN 0 WRa. 1102 AOEDOrt, CREPT= .aLT.SUDN USE RS NAT EC AUf.p1RR IfIK., n V,PTx TCO. DS. : . L LOCATION vEI5TSW Ul55I SO 1170-31—T 90STa3. 4,04:71/0 .. KRSSRL ARE SW42N IN MI 1111.01010E DDT O4Y MR' 1 'WON FRCP 4..TK. . • . SEC003 AM VERNIER O2Y .01.NDLATED MP.OI[ (*TE1 *CM OW 814500* 'ME CONTRALTO SSKL'.ATE7 . WD Y.KT LOT0I93 Or - - .ALL ESISTINO UTWTNS 0040 * CORC10N0 SIOKIRE r0 MT Ala YE RAM= UWG MOD K OCT23 IINE - n'1C.CtMRACTO.S FAIL[ TO 1 2RT LS�.TE MD CSERv MT ALL UNVERamRO WUXI 1 LOCATO'SOV2(U MELD RE - COTACUO FRIER TO MT CONSTRurildral SUESOfAQ MILRATIIM .. • 4040 .- 9ro+e. -ms - s mNaaa nav42At : 4 47RammAL .run a...am W 000120na9.'0e'. 030.[ci a-we. . SET vET.CON01PR MINTS M SWUM NOMA 1 051ITSGl 10110 ID MUD ON STET 1 OMS, 00.' MO2[C1.07'00{ -MT IT. a RVILX -DSI.R - KYR nn. ST 10.00An Ea0E40e4E AS 004204 N ERO. .- E. =MI S AWNS Ra[ 9l -o¢ V 1040 ME 03055001E• IDLY 040E T,00 W4*IAa1IM . 7. Y T I.IPT R. *00 10 MN 0nrt04L 10000✓NLC • MS Sheet. ACRD 046. 1652 Topo k dated MaL2002 • ___ :LYI.M �Scns SHOWN -! 7ste May 6.`2002 Cncdea T.W.W. Proiset No. . . 1711- E A R T H 10000 NE 0m St ' Regime. 9'A 90001 25 55 -M91 _— ` 70 S. 2 St 510.200 E.1 130.0 d *0y 90000 252 000 -0257 CITY OF TUKWILA FOSTER GOLF = ` LINKS' LAYERSET:07047SCN . . P1oN.S 07/29/02 09:50 .. ® V 17.7 SCHEMATIC GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA FOSTER ';GOLF .LINKS -CLARK ARCHITECTS /1°1%4 .BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS,.- INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS .& LAND SURVEYORS ' 7009 4N00 AYE EAST ' 1(3904( -O7 44)44 .. - SEATTLE Wo...�01 fAM1 (700 }7} -71}5 .. BIII�La 90107 -3517- E -MAIL• 11 ORNINC.009 AU6 1 t top 13900 Interurban Ave So. TukwiLa, WA 98168 206-433-0179 New Foster Golf Links : Clubhouse 13500 laterurban'Ave. So Tukwila, WA 98168 ,-• , c c :',,..=.._•g..-.,-.;-.,1...:...-..:.,-.:.!..'-.: . . E25T E5 - .• • -• •• PRESERVE PROTECT EXIST5 * TREES PME.l PROTECT DK F RA.— _X.... N-7-.S ...- .— .'-- PNEW_—_ S. YR-_LKEV_ -• . A N C 4 GREEN A51.1 SPRPIGWOCO FIN( HEATHER — ..R I E p.N.Ls ILROCER615,1PAEN5I5 ' EGL54 LAUL 1 PARTNERSHIP, PS. . .. -PRELIMINARY . - LANDSCAPE PLAN . 0 5 10 .20 11 +00 e< 6 • 12 6 o O , 20 ,- 40 .10 +50 4 1 60 " 80 ,100...120 140 160 180 200 11111111 11111 INIErrniehrffff 0 20 10 +00 4 .16 40 60 -13 +00 f. 12 .NW: & ;SW 1/4, SEC 14, JWP, 23 N,, -R 4;E, WM Baez 8400 EIEV - l4.+[ O - 2D 'A0 60 80 .100 -120 12 +50;`. ,68 Baez Fl-009 BEV 140 160.;180 15 +00. 16 16 ' 12 : 12 4 4' 0 -'.20 -40. 80 60'• 100, 120'. 16 12 +00 12 16B` 14.61,- • BA4Z FLOOD 1LEV 80 100 :.120 140 ,60.:,80 200 EtEV 14 -12 1 16 12 6 • 140 .160. 180 200 20. 40 60 BO 100 24..' 11 +50 20 • 40 16 12 120' 140 160 160 200 910 Ty000 EIEV 12 .1 60 80 100 120 140 160, 180 200 0 20 40 60 80 • ZI 14. 0 20 ',40;- 60 60 100 120 •140 -160 180 - 200'_• 14+50 16� 12 • B n. - E4EV .. 14.6 +..' - . ... 1 - • - i1-'- - -< a 1 /1 20 40. 60 80,100 _120 140 160:. - 14 +00 16 2 11.1== 1111 11 111/1111•11111l111 1111111111111111' 11111111111111.11 111a1111.■' 11 .4 0 20, . 13 +50- 16 16 el 12, 4 100 -120 140 '.160 160 200 40 1 15 +50 16 16 12 12 . 4 60 '' -80. 100, 120. 140 160. 180 200 BASE ;LOCO'EIE0 -' 14.6+'_ 16 40 60' -80 ..100 120. 140 160 160 200 '100 YR. FLOOD ELEVATION' TAKEN, FROM.THE - 'NATIONAL • FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM- FLOOD 'INSURANCE RATE- :,.MAP, PANEL 957 OF,1725; MAP No. .53033C09570, EI3ST1NG GRADE (TYPICAL). ,1221=11111111111 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 11111111111111M111 11111111111111111111 X1111111111111111!!1 0 20 40 . 60. BO 100. 120 15 +50 16' ELEV - 14.3+, • PROPOSED GRADE (TYPICAL)' 4 0 • 20 40, • 60; eo Too 120 140 .160 160. 200.. RECEIVED CC V2 • N..z r— V... • LL. N Q,: N . l to Y o.- a 1--. La- 0 1-- H 1' =40' 1 9 -9 -02 0.— • 2002042:00 40 RIVER ENVI ONIAENTT '1 12.3 "11. x5..3.;. 0I 0 0 1+ ' 0 T 0 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CITY OF TUKWILA = FOSTER GOLF LINKS CLARK ARCHITECTS WASHINGTON BUSH,. ROED do . HITCHINGS, INC. • CIVILppENGINEERS de LAND,SURVEYORS .. .- -06102 -3213. iA %I (206) 373 7132 E -NM4.1 i INC C09 :. City ofTukwila' .... 13900 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168, 206-433-0179..; • New Foster Golf Links Clubhouse ....13500 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 • 1701 - DAC `09/25/02. - -- ;& u . t t �I ► �i �,�»w.�:SIEfi0101�1 I2 �=��.��� c c c c ••`i ; c . = `���' O�Yi���.� ► w�i/O!� —� ■O1tOL.��O 0 �� r r �1 saw Vit■rvivadraiialr 1"111101".". 41111, INTERURBAN AVE.. • yZE • :COMMENTS PLANT UST Orr. BOTAIUCAL •TREE SCALE: 0 u 0 92 . 0 42 '. ILEX COR44TAT2OTINDA' ..: ®.' b ,HYORANY.EA OIJERCC LIA; . 0 T1 . rtl.IlONI.n AO iFOLllt7 62 t'T YRICA CALFOR4ICA © O .IO °d11.1e LAU ROGER ASUB SC.NIPICAEN515. . :0 6 RHODODENDRON 'ANAM KMACIKE' l0" 121.10000ENDRON\a4IOE• - 0 32 .'VIBURN CDAVIOII .. ' . 0 , 50 V01034-11 Tuns 'SPRING BOUQUET' ARLTOSTAPHrLOS UNITE ROOC ROSC. .. 50.ERSET OAP44E+ .CO q +ACT ED EuoNrr715 • b, nit IS• nut.: - : -•36• nAmm'1D A. O.AWt • 48' x1111-.. 3m' nut 36' P1 is- Mai. 24• x14. I GAL. 2 GAL - I GAL B.B. B.B B.B _B.B WS OR CONTAINER B.B OR CONTAN'!£R TREE-CUTTING PLAN AS SHOWN f0 %4Y •1•!PAP:: FEDTAWALAR VALVE sox OY.E 1312400 5ASFE00.:. r' ISOLATION VALVE vE-nA ON Cirt]L vaLYE RIAALITE sae GALL NIPPLE PVC FEMALE ADAPTER xnomigniur 4®®a IILL i n l ini =iii II,_ -.PVC LITERAL LSE SCHEMATIC SCALE. ATE VALVE 4F AND 6" POP UP SCALE: N76. CONTROLLER- .. AD 50433.3!." VALE m1,6 Yd' R01?D vALV! e0x- '1d9(712454 45 .8545014- F54ISN GRADE City of Tukwila 13900latcrurban Ave. So. Tukwila,' WA 98168:,'.. 206- 433 - 0179:: Nem Foster Golf links Clubhouse ` . 13500 Interurban Ave. So: : - Tukwila, WA'. 98168..:.. alb uvE - a T .. a as HMI ell P9M �4•roasis lGLAONV P.O.C. sows ELL. SFRMKLE0IN4121 PVC Ink SO NIPPLE SPRSJ'-LE2 INLET SIZE 2.4 voLT. Wit£ A.ID. ...TO DO VOLT POILOR1' _ GTJ;JU T TO VALYEe \ � \\FIMSN FLOOR PVC LATERAL LINE REMOTE CONTROL: VALVE SCALE NTS: LAWN ROTOR. 11/05/02... 11111118111, IRRIGATION LEGEND . - STMOL' _.' - DESCRIPTION. 1:._. /� 3P4514.ER RAINBPA ISO- 5439 - 3.'145 0'- VAN - ':13.16, 2131. 54 9! .DOD PPO 6FRRKLER RAE-BIRD 150- 5431 -FR3 15' 0, T, K T, T4 F: VAN. - 53, U3, 1/36,2,03,21.3.3.7. • ZOO (5Ors3(-D. -... :SPRINKLER RAIBN0 150 - 541 -PR9 0' 4 T. N. T, T413, VAN 55, 61.13, L45, L55: t6 1 33 ®: SPRINKLER 1446054) 012 5421.133.!910' 4 T: N F- 34434 3.4 53..19.135 . p0p'C ... 481431LER 54134300 SM -5431 -13145 D' -- O. T. N. F VAN 14, S. 32 4434. .. • ❑ 0 • .. SPRINKLER RANSIRD 150 -SAT1 -0141234.33413141,125-5121214455-51238 VAUNTER , • - AS P..0 s 5 RINKLER'RAIBOW 004- 5421 -PR5 B. 4 T. N. T. TO, F. VAN • 33, U4, 154. ].45.219. 31 ' .. D- an (16.1•3", ' . - 5 KINKIER RARBIRD tei4 -5An -3.'149 a' 4 T, KIT, T4 F. 14434 . i1. 713.42.80.34,383 .. .. m(, 5r'hTULCR .vnuvvuvi.�a✓v -x ... O G O ROTOR WRITER 1 -20-60 ULTRA, STARLESS STEEL RISER C'In! aTECK VALVE . ttllbE A$ NOTED ON p14AyNG:.. RANNRD P>2 43133 ELECTRIC RETWE CONTFEL' VALVE-- PLA9T12c ..SID 453128'!." a+ 35455. . VALVE DETAL -4CNE NEVER GrE M2NT 6 DOMECT0. 1 N• SERVICE IB CFR !X15Tse IRRIGATION rusirre0 ISOL81135 4&L34! - . Y BIGN1E4 G1130 COPLER VAL3:. SERER SOLD STATE CONTSO' •r£TAL CASSET - -'b[ 5TAn134 *NUT 543111 D Do VOLT AC. 60 414 Cara. 24 30.1 AC, 60 NZ :. 15, 4410. EL LISTED 410 TESTED. .. . I. PRIOR TO THE COSSENCEMFhT OF WORK CONTRACTOR T1.15T VERFT A STATIC: WATER . _ _55U2E CF S0 LBS. (0512) AT T4♦_ POINT CF CONNECTION • 2. NOTFY ARCNREGT OF l4VY 13512 _EPAFGY: . .IRRIGATION CONTRACTCR•15155PR4513:E FOR PROTECTING ALL ' UITLTTE9 ENCOINTEFED T-RAKd4 141E SCOPE CF 1-1L5 WORK. 3. ALL ."RA'IL'S ARE DIAGR4271ATIC. FIcLD.YARIA14CE5 MAY OCO1R: NCT11 .. .ARCFIITECT 12IIEDIATELY. : - ' -. 4. MANLINE LATC:JT I8431438,3114113 'R WAS SEW WORN N 'ARDSC4PE FOR: . 5. 'CONTRACTOR B 1E50131518LE TO PROND! ALW NECESSARY SLEEVNG HIDER .. 444RC19CA0E5. IE. ROADS, 50BE4LK5. ETC., W-ET4ER 5PECFICALLT INDICATED ON ... -., 4E 0RASMNGS03 NOT. 5LEEANG 114 1W EXTE 0 6. 9ET'GI'NG` WJ05GAF_ EDGE5. 6.. LOCATE -PIPE NEAR PERMANENT' STRICTURES ENERE P0550LE IE ALCSa EDGED OP 510E -5. ETC.' LEAVE PIPE SIZING FACE LIP N TRWER4 TO FACILITATE FERA'R •1 ALL 45431ZED TER1NAL LATERAL LIES ARE 3(4• PIPE • S. DER WADS IN PLANTING AREAS 55031 D BE A TLXIMS1 OF 4• FROM 4 SPRINKLER HEADS N 1.4443 AREAS WOAD BE 2• F%A1 BED EDGES. 10. IRRGATIPI 3651TRACTOR IS RE5PON51BLE TO FIE TINE ALL HOMER ON 542! TO 344445 0033183 12 AND 71344141E 0S'345ORAY.: _ - _ _ . 11. %ERFT 12134137 LER L06A71004 WIT44 GEIER .. • 12. 4543ATION CONTRACTOR LS RESPONSIBLE FOR WINTERIZATION OF STSTEtt' 61511211 MST E WINTERIZED 91 BLOWSG OUT 1.1114 COMPRESSED AIR 13. PIPNG MAY. BE INSTALLED N A COI'T10N TRENCH. ALLOW A MIS'Ul OF FAIR (4•) : NC4435 SETW!1/ PARALLEL PIPE LINES.' LOCATE i TO AV034 COPFLICT BTU 545TALLATION CF TREES' ampules. • 44. 120050•41E LAY -4'31234 0 34414!14 MNI -CLINK RAN AFGNITECT. "INSTALL FUR MANFAOIURE433 N9T3ACTIO S. - • RECE7 NU -18 2002 -- • City of Tukwila- - 13900 In erurban Ave: So. • • Tukwila, WA 98168 206- 433-0179_.:_'' New Foster Golf Links . Qubhouse .13500 Interur+..an Ave So. • Tukwila; WA- 98168 1701 LIMIT GFfd( LINE IMMO IN NM II 11/05/02 .: C C 0,C:C; LIMIT OF WORK TIE IRRIGATION PLAN THE BERGER • PARTNERSHIP, PS.. DAVID CLARg City of Tukwila 13900 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168' • 206 -433. 0179. - . - New Foss Golf links ` .. Clubhouse . 13500 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 1701. • •-.'Ai3',�6u . Lau Lau ..pui:x1 --o es - ' •.41 ro vr..no IRRICsATION LEGEND DESCRIPTION GPM SPRINKLER RA6636ZO 53.551 -PR5 5' VAN L3. lb. 2.131 39 63 SPRINKLER RA54! 53-6AM -5R3 S' O T. N. TT. T4 F. VAN .53. D6. 166. 2.46.11% Al 65 5NQER R4)191RD 1512.6AM- PR53' 4 T,11 TT. TO F. VAN .65. 13 LA3. L56. T6 658610.50. RANSPD 163. 6511 -555 10 0, T. N. 5. VAN 33 51, .3156. . DPRN0.5R 5A6SFID 53.6451 -PR5 6' 0. T. N. F. v4N )4. 35. 52. 554 .. 6PRl.CER RA606D 53•1340-PR5 3YMN1ER LCb-55 OR RC6.6S 66 SPANS -ER RAMIRO 5046 11 -PFS 5' 0 T.N. T. TOE. VAN 53. DA. 156. 246. 2.13 31 . 6PR/XLER RAMPED 504- 6A21PR6 3' O. 5• N. T. TOE,.v44 1l 5) 142. 130.2)4. 253 SPRINKLER RANSIRD 504-341-PRE 10' 0, T. N. F '33.51. 13 L46 6PRNSER RAS4UID 506 - 6511 -PRS S' 4 N : _ - A 2 ROTOR MITER 1.20.61 I0TRA 6TA6aE66 STEEL RISER 1:274 DECK VALVE' NOZZLE AD NOTED 04 PRAIRE. . . RATERS, NO3 EMU ELECTRIC 355151E COSROL VALVE -- PLAITS -635 AO DEDICATED ON DRAZING. VALVE DETAIL -2 1„ 515558 .. F1701T 22110 2.65 OFF IECSTAG IMTIGAT1d FVJGFE 52ATIC 1 VALVE r 2540! Da,LER VALVE ' It REMIND MS CASTER VALVE' 'r SUOQER DISK COUPLER VALVE .. MADLNE 50LATI04 VALVE -- DER56 SOLID STATE CONTRCALER•FETAL GANNET-- 701 6TATCO. WRIT FECURD, wen VOLT AC.60 NZ MP 24 VOLT AG 60 NZ GENERAL NOTES • F'Rbm TO TIE COrFFJKBENT OF UCR(•'CONTRACTOR FEET VERFT A STATIC WATER FREE:ERE CF 60 LBS. (561) AT TIE POSIT CIF CO?ECTIOL NOTIFT ARCHITECT CV ANY DISCREPANCY... - - c . UTILITE5 ENCOLNTSEED 11150.25.4 THE SCOC E OF 44,6 3551 3. ALL DRAILINGS ARE DI4GRAPPLATIC.' FELD.VARIANCES FIAT CC/252 NOTIFY;. ARLWTECT 515D1ATELT. 4. IMDdNE LATOIT 5 'JIAGRAFPLATIG R NAS SEEN 8410171 N HARD5OAF£ FOR FSA2P06E OF CLARE1'. S. CONTRACTOR 16 RE6Po405LE TO PROVIDE ALL' 1f 66ART SLEEVED INDER LARDECAFEE. I . ROADS. SIDEWALKS. ETC- DAET1Ep. DSECFICL' LT I NDICATED ON THE 58458556 OR NOT 6LEE VNG WOAD EXTEND 6` EETGTID 1lARO404PE EDGES 6..Ld. 413 PPE NEAR FERIAF4Qn 615 1URE6 MERE P0666°LE. LE. ALOE EOGE5 OF IIDr]WLK5. ETC.. LEAVE PIPE 61ZNG F.CE UP N 189104 TO FACILITATE FEPAF2 1 ALL ISSUED.145134AL LATERAL LINED APE 3/4' PIPE. .. - 6. 6PRFKLER 1EAD6 N PLANTING AFEA5 611015 SE A 21001.11 CF AT FROM _ .. B. 6PRDKLER HEADS N LAIN AMA& 6140110 DE 2• FR01 BED EDGES - .. ORIGATEN CONTRACTOR D REEF...MAIM P TO FFE 125E ALL NOM E5 ON SITE TO :. MIRE COVERAGE AND MEDI= OrEREPRAT. a 'wan' COCTi7LLER LOCATILT14ATI4 DINER • . . - 3. ' 1FRUAT10N co11RACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR WINTERIZATION OF STETS'& 6767571. FEET SE LOITER= ST BLOU5i' On WITH 301•F RESEED AIR . . - . D.. PIPING FAT SE INSTALLED N A COFPIO 1 TRUCK ALICE 4 MNC1.11 CF 50113 (4•) SCREE SETIEEN PARALI_ PPE LNES: LOCATE 7T11LME6 TO AVOID COA.ICT 101(4 N5TALLA110F7 a TREED F 651 .155.', - . . :u. COORDINATE LOCATION OF MINTER F5L 4;uK RAN Geirs DIT4 ARGMi1ECT.' - N6TALL PER FLIIFACTIFB[6 NDTI2CTI[x5. . IRRIGATION PLAN 1" = 20%0" • .RECT.--, .: . H0V 18.7 ..• DAVIT) A. CIAItA AltClll l (Cf ' I'LLC POTALL PERM-LEERS PER I4TRRI225'IO GAUGE NON-GALVANIZED ORE WI NEWVW1L NOSE OR CN01 TIES 2- STARED EOODETI 1WARES_ TREES LESS A•CALD CALL . BEES LESO iNAPl L -N•U1L I19E7 X7 • L • 4 LOCO POST • • ALl, STEEL PENCE POUT NNALL P ABOA - . 010361 CO :TAMER OF-PILL APPTm+ED TOP50LL OEIAA. APPLES TO TREES. S1t6OS AND f%{0' COVER PLANTPG6 TREE PROTECTION FENCE SCALE, pe, SCALE SHRUB PLANTINS 31:TAIL NO TREES PLANTED OVER S1g1CTIRAL SLAB SMALL BE STmOD- ,' )•TREE PLANTINS DETAIL • .SCALE• NOT 10 SCALE . City of Tukwila 13900 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila; WA 98168. 206433 -0179: New Foster Golf Dub Clubhouse 13500 Interurban Ave.'So. Tukwila, WA 98168. :.. 5 � PQJTEGT. - GOLF -- :.COURSE .' OPERATIONS OFFICE TRAILER 1701 BC;DK:- orA 000 .11/05/02.' DIPIP6 TER PAD SEE CIVIL' E;CSTIn0 TEES • Pn-SERyE t PROTECT ExlS11 TrEESI • fa AIM, .ailMa.. ` ■ rai r O y . i . O� . . .a./ � - -' .. .... ....... -'� C I. ®® CG IMIVAIMIEMEINIM WI CL N MEI MEI VOW MI/ . - .. a GLVNMCA -- CP PRNG DOD PMC HFATIER ED: VEGETATION ALO■G STREET.FRGNTACE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED ' OTHERWISE. • N-FILL 'EXISTING HEDGE AND.. .... REPLENISH MULCH GR *CEP COVER AT DISTURBED AREAS ON IIEST SIDE OF CURB VEGETATION A-CN - STREET FR>7NSTAC-E TO REMAIN WLESE. NOTED . OTHER UISE. IN-FILL EXISTING HEDGE AND REPLEUSN FILCH $ GROUP COVER AT .ISTUREED -AREAS CN ST SIDE OF CURB LANDSCAPE PLAN THE BERGER PAR•TSI l IPA P.5. 1 " =20'-0 Va \'lu , .. 6.d! :" RCliu 1-18. v.G. RE -10vE GRAvEL. RACE TOPSOIL TO 1•EIG14T of ADJACENT GRADES W/O DISTL'RT31NG TREE ROOTS.. City ofTuka la 13990 lntescuban Ave. So. -' • Tukwila, WA 98168 • 206433-0179', . • New Fast= Golf links .. . Clubhouse - - . 1 uc 3500 Intecban Ave. So. Tukwila_ WA 98168 1701 • LCIIT OF WORK LIKE . TO 3'.0R1 WALL' • __ _____ - 3___ \ TREE FROTECTION (4 • •0CATIOM CPE11TRt- SIGN SEE ARCHITECTURAL TRANSPLANTED OUERDJB R1BRA RED OAK -- J:4(7. •11A AOJP-0LU1 CO1PAC• 41104 ALONG STREET FRONTAGE TO REt1AIN UNLESS NOTED 0TIERBASE. • IN -FILL EXISTING HEDGE AND 2m.E.. -L514 :. M9JLCN t GROUND COVER Al DISTURBED•AREAS 6781 WE61 SIDE -. :PLANT LIST • RED OAK VERIST CN SOB . . vERPY ON SITE PLANT LIST., are. BOTANY -AL 51.125.8 (CONTJ 0,. 34 CISTUB try -SW U5 O ta DAPJNE Y. BURY -00000 'CAROL HACKIE' ID ,48 DARWE'X BURKILOODII '80'1EREET' p: IA . EUONT1-115 ALATA COIPACTA' - 0 04 . ILEX CO8'UTA ' .AR158A' O 42 ILE3I COR4TA 'ROTLNDA' ®' e'.. NYDRAI•Y¢A OJERCIFOLIA - O as MANONIA AOUTOLet1 COYPACTA' Q 13 MYRCA CALIFCRIICA O 03 : PRAMS _AUROCER/ SUS 13CNIPKAEN815' O 6 RNOOODENDRON ANAN KALSC KE ' 0 10 "RHODODENDRON WIOIIE' O 31 - vIBUR4a1 DAVIDII . COMP STRAI,,, RR Y TREE 36" 1UN BJB 0 30 - vBRar1 Twos - BPR6C. BOOET' STRAWetc r1 TREE 6' -0" T. HLLTI -S EMLD SPECIMEN MOAR b. SPREAD OCOLNYTA AP P EPR R BY LA >YIy A MINOR /---., . ERICA'BPReYa11AOOD Rrex' 1 LADY 65 LAVANCUAL A) 1 16OLIA GRA MI 20" nut CONTAINER -- OR CONTAINER 240 YAJYRSA REFERS 36" MK BtB `' 41 . PIRNLI8 LAUROCERAMIS 110N1 'E111NON Miss, ; ROW C - YCINOmES - o IU . BER°ERS 11iNBER'sI' _CRIHPON •TGT1Y• CRPIBCN PYGMY BARBERRY 83 .' BERBER* T12NBER6II '9PARGLE' . , SPARKLE BARBERRY" .. •.. AT BERBERS k GLADIUf6614519 ... 1NLLV.81 PENT .. UNITE ROCK ROSE CAROL HACKIE DAP.8:E SC iERBET OAPME COiPACT'WNGED EURN-t11 CAR188A CN11E8E MOLLY .. ROTIM4 CMPESE LIOLLY . OAKLEAF HYDRANGEA C01PACT OREGON GRAPE PASPIC WAY H"RtLE SCNIFKA LIWREL . b„ 7131. 15' Hx 24• MN' '. 24' HK • ' 24••: Htl". 74" Mk 48 114 30- HPl• . 36'• MDL; 8" 1171 24' Nei LANDSCAPE PLAN T EBEBGER PARINERSNIP.PS PER8'1*N LE 1 GAL • tr or SPRe'Y+WOOD PING NEATMER '2 GAL , " - 34' OC. ' GRAY LADY ETC ,1941 LAV4NDER .1 (,Al : - ' 24' or_ • CREEPNC I'1ANCNIA - 1 GAL'. •' 18".06. MT. vEF310N LAUREL ' 2 GAL' 36" 0G' NCN - I GAL b"OC. ORNAMENTAL (MRAew - .RATS oANTER PANSIES E.,.. LEGEND .' FLAG NOTES PROVIDE E d5TN6 A AYALT DIE PATH CONCRETE - •'6DEeuLK AD REDD FOR NM ENTRY. CONTRACTOR 5144LL. 6GN CLOSURE / WASNIND 6OWD APPROVED DT" CITY SHALL RESTORE eon PALED 1EMPORART '.PADS •/N 46 41OOR5 OF CLOSURE OR AS ALLOWED O °D DT arr. . CC•A'R.c1 NEL ENTRANCe N 6TRCT ACCORDANCE -•/ CRT. 07.6 DARD6. BEE CJVd NEE15 FOR room NFO. • • IDDRDED CONGFETE CUD. DEE DETAIL .:.47, DIVE FRE LAZE 51RIPING PER CITY STATDAFD6.: 4' nom DROOn F►1101ED 005. eNTRT V RA•® D4T1Y '.' AONT6 • APPROK 747 54. NR .CE RADIUS FRO" CENTER.'.' .. [ISLAND as DDGATED. PRO61DE ENPANDI01 -owns • D' DP4C04111AN • AS INDICATED. - INDICATED AREA TO DE PANTED WITH 6' 14I(41 LETTERS SPELLING •CCTPACT'. CNRE N COLOR RELOCATED -DEFT u4R1E16 wow LOCATE PER COLF . Ci• of Tulcdaa • 13900 Immrubau Aim. So. Tukwila, WA 98168_ 206- 433-0179 : :1701.'' NOTES 11/.18/02. PROTECTIVE GOLF —, PARTIAL SITE PLAN - SOUTH 1 " =20' -0" • INTERURBAN AVE. 'm: 6 m. 30 '. 40 FEET -LE:GEND NEW 6.2 PANNE. AePNALT PAVING 13. BABE • r TOP NEW EXTRUDED CONCRETE ORE APPROX PROJECT WIZ A. PANTED eTwP.o LINT, LINE e•,I.EE E. ,IF DETAIL _ _ — FLAG NOTES / AMC PAD. - ,EE .EOa BEET, •OR EXACT LOCATION& - - . / PROVIDE 4' TACK PAD •r e.,. ■ONIO PAP REPP.,. EA ' UQT, DIED e' EETO E AZT DPE0 8 / TO' WIDE FIRE . .D- - ORMtDE CONTROL JOWE • ALK oz../ E TJAwIw .. _ / ,,D, rte • e.o oA PoR emawice. SEE oETAae A��� ' ' PROVIDE t' ACE PM taws swan. PER OTT 1 REOIIC&I'EWL ' 1 •. NECK MOEN PRIMED CONC. &M er W RAKED COTTT / R�LAND AS TED. PROVIDE !OTAN,KR JORTO�. Mme' 1 - - . SPACING max J m POC.•ED.. - ' I. . -\ / SPELLING 'COTAC . PATE 64 C0.OR .0C.TE, AREA TO ee PAWED 11.014 r WON LETTER, ' k N, , / \ . \ )/ / came FN R \ City of Tukwila 13900 Intettuban Ave S0. Tukwila, WA 98168 206.433.0179. RELOCA TED TEN WARNS NOW . LOCATE PER GOLF EXI5T. Cue...OUSE NIG) SEE DE110 RAN • OyTDOOR PAT1O • covOd 11/18/02.: OOOr�i are °� $ `1 101P �� a na� l4B1Mr11111111E■oes11er31111M111111111/. rv•e'er ... . ... .. ..e�•.'l)... >v X AY• I. I PAPER. \\ ID ,\ CI AlZt III I 1..( 11.1C2 GEE PARTIAL OfTE PLAN - worm &EFT A-01 BEE PARTIAL BRE • PLAN - 0OUTM 8NE1R A-104 100 TR FLOOD PLAIN L NE • 150' ELEV. AO144LT PANTO • CONCRETE .; s..oriecApiti& 01.040 • arteA es NU_ N MVO VR n.00n ruitt FLAG NOTES • AREA CF FILL IN FLOOD PLAN City of Tukanlai 13900 Interurbatt Ave SO. Tukwila, WA 98168 206-433-0179 : 13500 Interurban Ave_ So. Tukwik, WA 98168 Oen STOPS GENERAL NOTES ZEE erv■L' -ortAaeos POR VEMCLE NATIEPAR:TO CTAORRIL uADE FIRE/ CILM:WOR PATIO ' .11/18/02' • PERMIT SITE PLAN • PARKIN G DATA 1" = 40-0" . SU I I-0 ING :11■PORMAT ION . p4 / LcurraE • •HEETING TOTAL BUILDING 'AREA SCALE: in iv 20 40 09 FEET 1".40.-0" • . RtCEiVED- .-A-101 NOV 18 2001 • „•..•