HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E02-024 - BARGHAUSEN / ROBB REZONE - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CODE AMENDMENTThis record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure
pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW
as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below.
E02 -024
Barghausen / Robb Rezone
6550 / 6542 Southcenter Boulevard
RECORDS DIGITAL D- ) EXEMPTION LOG
THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION
F,age # Code
Exemption � � �� Brief Explsnatoty Description, Statute /Rule
The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress'
intent that social security numbers are a private
concern. As such, individuals' social security
Personal Information —
numbers are redacted to protect those
Social Security Numbers
individuals' privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec.
5 U.S.C. sec.
DR1
Generally — 5 U.S.C. sec.
552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure
552(a); RCW
552(a); RCW
under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington
42.56.070(1)
42.56.070(1)
State Public Records Act, which exempts under
the PRA records or information exempt or
prohibited from disclosure under any other
statute.
Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit
card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit
Personal Information —
expiration dates, or bank or other financial
RCW
12
DR2
Financial Information —
account numbers, which are exempt from
42.56.230(5)
RCW 42.56.230(4 5)
disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5),
except when disclosure is expressly required by
or governed by other law.
CONTAINS
FILES THAT
REQUIRE
REDACTION
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
& ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT
6550 & 6542
SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
E02 -024
• a
See File E03 -017
(SEPA -- Annual Comprehensive Plan
Amendments-2002-2003) for
complete record
File E02 -024 (Robb Rezone) was
closed out and the payment returned
to the applicant. Environmental
information for this file is included in
E03 -017.
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431 -3670
Fax: (206) 431 -3665
Fax
To: I'TG - /0/ //X -#7t- 7
Fa 52,r- 2-T/ --622-2-
-Mom: yes - Lr, -e 6? 2-
From:
Date:
City Of Tukwila
Pages:
Re: 4(64-1) 07'1, e8-#7 cr 4/244> h4> 3� e
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
/
•Comments:
%1a -r /c/
/ /J" p a -v /4
4y OA
6k. . c
2-D6 - /3 / - 5J
/2 /, //4-r;
• TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT
T
(MAY 29 '03 10 :31AM)
A DCD /PW
THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED
FILE FILE TYPE OPTION
055 MEMORY TX
TEL NO.
9 *- 4252518782
(AUTO)
PAGE RESULT
05/05 OK
ERRORS
1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY
Department of Community Development
6300 5outhcanter Blvd, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Phone: (206) 431-3670
Fax: (206) 431-3665
Fax
3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION
To: / From
Date: S-
6774 PHi 1 te: ,f - 76? 2- Pages:
r
p4 Fox- p r zr/-622-2-
City Of Tukwila
RO-Lgres_
X
Re:
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply
- r% ALL ' i
0 Please Recycle
• •
City of Tukwila ila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Harley Mattson
Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc.
18215 72nd Avenue S.
Kent, WA 98032
May 28, 2003
Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan change/Rezone at 6550 and 6542
Southcenter Boulevard
Dear Ms. Mattson:
Brian Shelton, Tukwila City Engineer, has completed his review of the transportation -
related information which you provided. He has noted that the Traffic Impact Analysis
does not address issues which were part of his request for transportation - related
information. He also requests additional data. Please provide the following information
by June 6,20003. In that way, the project can be placed on the June 26, 2003 Planning
Commission as scheduled.
Please provide the following previously requested information per the letter dated March
27, 2003 (enclosed) as follows:
• 1.A.1 b &d, topography and driveway(s) location and grade for existing
land use
• 3.E. Driveway design; width (25 feet min.), throat length, grade, throat
length
• 3.F. Access alternatives
• 3.G. 2. On -site circulation
The report needs to provide additional information and discussion addressing existing
conditions and proposed changes regarding vehicular ingress and egress including:
• trucks,
• alternative access to the property (from the west, for example),
• ability to provide parking,
• on -site circulation, driveway ingress /egress given the existing topographic
conditions and property boundaries including retaining walls and steep
slopes.
Figure 5 should be revised to include site - related traffic volumes at Intersection E.
Finally, the sight distance analysis should include evaluation based on 85th percentile
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
operating speed of 45 mph.
Per my phone message to you, we need the complete information no later than June 6,
2003 to allow the Tukwila Planning Commission to place the project on the agenda for
their June 26, 2003 meeting.
Please contact meat 206 - 431 -3683 or via e -mail at rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have
questions about this request.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
Enc.
Cc Brian Shelton
•
City of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Harley Mattson
Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc.
18215 72 'd Avenue S. '
Kent, WA 98032
March 27, 2003
Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan change/Rezone at 6550 and 6542
Southcenter Boulevard
Dear Ms. Mattson:
As a result of the March 17, 2003 public meeting, the Tukwila City Council and Mayor
have requested additional information to help them evaluate your client Eric Robb's
request for a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map changes from Low Density
Residential (LDR) to Office (0) at 6542 and 6550 Southcenter Boulevard.
Please provide the following information by April 21, 2003:
• Site survey showing the precise location of the existing buildings in relation to the
property lines. A complete topographic survey is not necessary at this time.
• Traffic and access study containing the following:
1. Inventory Site conditions
A. Existing land use
1. Site physical characteristics
a. lot size(s), configuration, boundaries
b. topography
c. contours
d. driveways) location and grade
B Proposed land use
1. Changed use
- 2. Other properties /developments in vicinity
2. Transportation system
A. Existing right -of -way
B. Street network including intersections and geometrics
C. Site access point(s)
D. Traffic volumes including turning movement counts
E. Safety evaluation
1. Accident data, last 3 years
6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite Tl00 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 20o- 131 -3670 • Fax: 206- 131.3065
2. Sight distance
3. Development related traffic
A. Trip generation, peak hour
B. Trip distribution
C. Trip assignment
D. Driveway volumes including directional and turning movement
E. Driveway design; width (25 feet min.), throat length, grade, 'throat length
F. Access alternatives
-- G. Potential site constraints
1. Parking requirements
2. on -site circulation
H. Queuing analysis
I. LOS analysis
As we discussedby phone, we will need the complete information by April 21, 2003 so
that the Tukwila Planning Commission will be able to place the project on the agenda for
their May 22, 2003 meeting.
Please contact me at 206 -431 -3683 or via e -mail at rfoxna_ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have
questions about this request.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
•
Gity of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development
Eric Robb
P.O. Box 88510.
Tukwila, WA 98188
May 27, 2003
Steve Lancaster, Director
Dear Mr. Robb:
Please find enclosed a refund check for $500. The City of Tukwila will prepare
environmental review for your requested Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code amendments,
so it will not be necessary for you to pay.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Fox
Senior Planner
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
c <C.ITY.(OF :TU KW I LA
TREAS ;URERS,.CHECK
200.SOUTHCENTER BLW 206,433 1.835..
:,.TUKWILA, WA 98188 :`•
-
To: Laurie Anderson
From: Rebecca Fox
Subj: Refund
Date: May 20, 2003
Please issue a refund of $500 to Eric Robb, receipt # R020001810 (attached). Please
send the check to me in DCD, and I will forward it to Mr. Robb with a letter. Thanks.
City of*I'ukwila
6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670
RECEIPT
Parcel No.: 0003200018 Permit Number: EO2-024
Address: 6542 SOUTHCENTER BL TUKW Status: PENDING
Suite No: Applied Date: 12/31/2002
Applicant: BARGHAUSEN /ROBB REZONE Issue Date:
Receipt No.: R020001810 Payment Amount: 500.00
Initials: RF Payment Date: 12/31/2002 02:03 PM
User ID: 1683 Balance: $0.00
Payee: BARGHAUSEN
TRANSACTION LIST:
Type Method Description Amount
Payment Check 46764 500.00
ACCOUNT ITEM LIST:
Description
Account Code Current Pmts
SEPA
000/345.831 500.00
Total: 500.00
doc: Receipt Printed: 05 -19 -2003
•
CITY OF TUKWILA REC9�r SEPA
Department of Community Developmentnrr - 1 70OZENVIRONMENTAL
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E -mail: Ut r
tuk P lan @ci.tukwila.wa.us DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW
INFORMATION
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires all agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a
development before making decisions (43.21 RCW). The purpose of environmental review is to identify a
proposal's significant adverse impacts, measures to minimize or avoid such impacts, and allow wide public
review for a wide range of projects.
REQUIREMENTS: SEPA review is required for any action associated with the following types of
decisions:
1 Developing more than 4 dwelling units.
2. Agricultural structures over 10,000 s.f.
3. Office, school, commercial, recreational, services or storage buildings over 4,000 s.f. and 20 parking
spaces (certain utility lines, personal wireless communication facilities, and normal
maintenance /replacement activities are fully exempt).
4. Parking lots with over 40 spaces.
5. Landfills and excavations over 500 cubic yards.
6. Land use decisions involving a subdivision of land into 5 or more lots, design review, a Conditional Use
Permit, an Unclassified Use Permit.
The accompanying application must be completed. If a question does not apply, "Does not apply" or "NA"
may be entered. Complete answers to the checklist may avoid unnecessary delays later. City staff may also
be able to help about governmental designation (e.g., zoning, shoreline, and landmark status).
PROCEDURES: Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff determines if it is complete,
based on the following "Complete Application Checklist ". If not, you will be mailed a letter outlining what
additional information is needed.
Once the application is "complete," substantive review will begin and a "Notice of Application" must be
posted /mailed to begin the public comment period. After completing the environmental analysis and
considering public comments, the Director will approve the project as proposed, approve it with impact
mitigation requirements, or require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared due to probable,
significant, negative, environmental impacts.
C:\ homepage \Tukwila\dcdlapps\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08!31/00
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us
•
SEPA
ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW
1.1 APPLICATION
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
Robb Rezone
LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate
lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL
NUMBERS.
Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019
Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188
Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR:
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name:
Address:
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. / Eric LaBrie or Harley Mattson
18215 — 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
Phone:
425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782n I ` p�
Signature: Date: 1 3t 1
CAmvepage\Tukwile appa\SEPAAPP.00C.08131/00
FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA
Planner:
File Number:
Application Complete
(Date:
)
Project File Number:
Application Incomplete
(Date:
)
Other File Numbers:
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
Robb Rezone
LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate
lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL
NUMBERS.
Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019
Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188
Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4
(This information may be found on your tax statement.)
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR:
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name:
Address:
Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. / Eric LaBrie or Harley Mattson
18215 — 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032
Phone:
425) 251 -6222 FAX: (425) 251 -8782n I ` p�
Signature: Date: 1 3t 1
CAmvepage\Tukwile appa\SEPAAPP.00C.08131/00
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Robb Rezone
2. Name of Applicant:
Eric Robb
3. Date checklist prepared:
December 24, 2002
4. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing if applicable):
Agency Comments
The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications are anticipated
to be approved by the spring of 2003.
6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to
or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No future plans for additions, expansion, or further activity are connected with this
proposal at this time.
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
No known environmental information has been or will be prepared that is directly related
to this non - project action.
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known.
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications by
the City of Tukwila does not require any other permit approvals.
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
G:\ PPHAN/ LANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC.08/1U00 1
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
Please respond to all question•se separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
•
Agency Comments
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat
those answers on this page.
The proposed land use action is a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment. The
applicant is proposing a change in the Land Use and Zoning Code Maps from Low
Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). The site is approximately 0.74 acres and is
occupied by two, separate single - family residences. The applicant wishes to continue
using the site for residential purposes after the Land Use and Zoning Maps are amended.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, the
tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a
range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.
While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to
duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to
this checklist.
Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019
Site address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188
Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 23, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. The
site is located on the northeast corner of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South.
See Figure 1— Vicinity Map, Figure 2 — Site Plan, and Appendix A — Legal Description.
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of Tukwila's
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined as "[areas] where
landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and
which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include
areas sloping more than 40 percent."
G :WPPHAN/LANDUSEAPPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00
2
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all questionJse separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
•
Agency Comments
a. General descri s lion of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, 1 the . moderately sloped
The site contains a portion of a steep slope in the southern areas of tax lots 17 and
19, and is relatively flat in the remaining areas of the subject property.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope onsite is approximately 40 percent, and is located at the
approach of the existing access drive.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey lists
this area as "Urban Land" (UR) soils. UR is soil that has been modified by
disturbance of natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to
accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley,
the fill ranges from approximately 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from
gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to
moderate.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Sensitive Areas Map lists this area as being an
area where landslide potential is high.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
No grading or filling activities are proposed. This is a non - project action.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
g.
No clearing or construction activities are proposed. This is a non - project action.
Use of the site will not change as a result of the proposed Comprehensive
Plan/Zoning Code Amendment; therefore, erosion related to use of the site will be
unlikely.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
G: APPHAN /LANDUSEAPPSEPAAPP.DOC.O8/S1A0
3
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all question.se separate sheets as necessary. •
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,
if any:
This is a non- project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for
example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction
and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
Off -site sources of emissions include surrounding residential and office land uses.
These are not anticipated to affect this proposal.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if
any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,
state what stream or river it flows into.
The Green River is located to the east and across Southcenter Boulevard
from the site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within
200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
This is a non - project action. No work is planned over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet of) the Green River.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in
or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
This is a non - project action. No fill or dredge activities are proposed.
G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/31/00
4
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
Please respond to all questionJse separate sheets as necessary. •
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if
known.
This is a non - project action. No surface water diversions or withdrawals are
proposed.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location
on the site plan.
No. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM map,
panel number 0959, the site is located outside of the 500 -year flood zone.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
This is a non - project action. No discharges of waste materials to surface
waters are proposed.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities,
if known.
This is a non - project action. No groundwater withdrawals or discharges to
groundwater are proposed.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of animals or
humans he system(s) are expected to serve:
This is a non - project action. The site is served with public water and
sanitary sewer. No waste material discharges are proposed.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other
waters? If so, describe.
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP'SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00
5
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all questionJse separate sheets as necessary. •
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site.
Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off -site
and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
Birds:
Mammals:
Fish:
Other:
Hawk, heron, eagle, 'songbirds', other:
Deer, bear elk, beaver, other:
Bass, almo , trout, herring, shellfish, other:
Rodents
G:\APPHANILANDUSEAPF SEPAAPP.DOC. 08/31/00
6
10751.001.doc [HMM\tepj
Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
✓
Evergreen tree: E, cedar, pine, other
✓
Shrubs
✓
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,
skunk cabbage, other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
✓
Other types of vegetation: typical residential landscaping
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site.
Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off -site
and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or
are known to be on or near the site:
Birds:
Mammals:
Fish:
Other:
Hawk, heron, eagle, 'songbirds', other:
Deer, bear elk, beaver, other:
Bass, almo , trout, herring, shellfish, other:
Rodents
G:\APPHANILANDUSEAPF SEPAAPP.DOC. 08/31/00
6
10751.001.doc [HMM\tepj
Please respond to all questionse separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off -site
and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off -site
and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Not to our knowledge.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
This is a non- project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
This is a non - project action. The existing structures utilize electricity for heating,
lights, and typical appliances. No changes in energy consumption are anticipated.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? 'If so, generally describe.
This is a non- project action. The existing structures are located above -grade from
surrounding properties and are situated such that solar impacts are not associated
with the site. No changes are proposed.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,
if any:
This is a non- project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
This is a non- project action. The existing use does not store or utilize toxic
chemicals or hazardous substances; therefore, environmental health hazard risks
will not occur as a result of this proposal.
G: APPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00
7
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all questionJse separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
1) Describe special emergency service that might be required.
This is a non - project action. The existing use does not require special
emergency services; therefore, no need for special emergency services will
result from this proposal.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,
if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
b. Noise:
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
2) What types and Levels of noise would be created by or associated with
the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
This is a non - project action. The existing use does not create traffic,
construction, operation, or other related noises; therefore, long -term and/or
short -term noise is limited to very low volume automobile noise from
occasional cars entering and exiting the site.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently used for two, separate single - family residences. Uses
surrounding the site are as follows: to the west is an office building, to the north is
vacant residential land, to the south and across Southcenter Boulevard are
commercial uses, to the east and across the Green River are commercial uses.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
The site has not been historically used for agricultural purposes.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Tax Lot 18 is occupied by a single - family residence constructed in 1957. It is a
single -story, brick structure, and is centrally located on the lot. Tax Lot 19 is
G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08,31/00 8
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
Please respond to all questionjse separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
occupied by a single - family residence and a detached garage. Tax Lot 17 is vacant
and is used for access and utilities.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
This is a non - project action. The existing structures will remain intact.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
This site is currently zoned LDR — Low Density Residential.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The current Comprehensive Plan designation is LDR — Low Density Residential.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
g.
The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of
Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined
as "[areas] where landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between
15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or
bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent."
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
This is a non - project action. No changes in residency are proposed.
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
This is a non - project action. No persons would be displaced as a result of the
proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
J•
The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will help to further
the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor goal by providing a buffer
between Southcenter Boulevard and the LDR uses to the north. The Office land
use will be compatible with properties located adjacent to the site.
G :WPPHAN/LANDUSEAPP\SEPAAPP.DGC. 08/31/00 9
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all questions. se separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low- income housing?
This is a non - project action. No residential units will be provided.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
This is a non - project action. No housing will be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest of any proposed structures(s), not including antennas; what
is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
This is a non - project action. No structures are proposed.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
This is a non - project action. No views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or
obstructed.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
This is a non - project action; therefore, light or glare will not result from this
proposal.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
This is a non- project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
G :WPPHAN/LANDUSEAPP SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00
10
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
Please respond to all questions•se separate sheets as necessary. •
' Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
The site is located within approximately a half -mile of Fort Dent Park and the
Family Fun Center. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
This is a non - project action; therefore, existing recreational uses will not be
displaced as a result of this proposal.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or
Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
Not to our knowledge.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None to our knowledge.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
If evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific, or culturally significant objects
are found, the State Historical Preservation Office will be notified.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is accessed via a 40 -foot -wide access and utilities easement off of
Southcenter Boulevard, at the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th
Avenue South. This is a non - project action; therefore, access to the site will
remain as -is. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map and Figure 2 — Site Plan.
G: W PPHAN/LANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 011/31/00
11
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
Please respond to all question.se separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
The site is not served with public transit. The nearest transit stop is located
approximately 'A -mile to the west, at the Southcenter Boulevard and 62nd Avenue
South service stop.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. The existing
residential parking will not be eliminated as a result of this proposal.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
Not anticipated.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe.
None are proposed. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not
apply.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts 011 public services, if
any.
This is a non- project action; therefore, this item does not apply.
GAAPPHAN/LANDUSE. APPSEPAAPP.DOC. 08/31 /00
12
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
Please respond to all questionitse separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
'Electricity', natural gas, (water,
'refuse service',
system, other:
, sanitary sewer, septic
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing
the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the
inunediate vicinity which might be needed.
This is a non - project action. No new utilities or services are anticipated for this
proposal.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that
the lead a:_ncy is relying on them to make its decision.
Signatur
Date Submitted: I
bran
NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND
ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PAGES).
G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00
13
10751.001.doc [HMM\tep]
D. . SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT ACTIONS
(Do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
There are currently no plans for development - specific projects for this site. However,
should there be a future development project, the project will implement stormwater
management practices to ensure discharge of water does not increase as a result of the
completed development. No significant impact to air and water or significant generation
of noise are anticipated as a result of this proposal. Production, storage, and/or release of
toxic or hazardous substances will not be associated with this proposal. Future
development - specific projects will be subject to a separate environmental review.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Future development- specific projects would be required to include an on -site storm
drainage system designed to collect stormwater runoff in accordance with applicable
regulations, and the site would be developed in compliance with the City of Tukwila's
development standards.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Future development- specific projects would result in vegetation removal in construction
areas; however, landscaping would be provided as required by the applicable Tukwila
Code requirements, and removal of existing vegetation will be addressed through the
environmental review process for any future proposal.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Future development- specific projects would be landscaped in accordance with applicable
City of Tukwila code requirements. Future development activity would be addressed
through the environmental review process. Appropriate measures to protect or conserve
plants and animal habitat will be proposed at that time.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The energy needs of future on -site development will not likely deplete energy or natural
resources. Energyneeds will be addressed through the environmental review process for
that proposal.
G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP,SEPAAPP.DOC. 08/31/00
14
10751.001.doc [HMM \tep]
• •
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Future structures will be designed to comply with Energy Code requirements.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as
parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Future development projects will be required to ensure that the on -site steep slopes would
be protected with adequate setbacks. Impacts associated with future development
projects will be subject to separate environmental review and will be addressed at that
time.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
Sensitive area buffers and setbacks will be provided in accordance with regulations in
effect at the time of development of any future project proposals.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will not allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. All future
development will be comparable with the surrounding zoning.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Future development projects will occur away from sensitive areas, to reduce or avoid
impacts and will be consistent with the surrounding land uses in the Office zone.
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan?
The Shoreline Master Plan will not be affected by the proposal because the site is not
located within a Shoreline Master Plan area designation.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
service and utilities?
Future development projects will add to the demands on transportation and public
services, and will be evaluated for associated impacts as required by regulations in effect
at that time.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
Future development project impacts would be subject to City of Tukwila development
regulations, and would be subject to applicable mitigation measures in effect at that time.
MAPPHAN/LANDUSEAPASPPAAPP.DGC, 08/31)00
15
10751.001.doc [HMIMtep]
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment does not conflict with
local, state, or federal laws for the protection of the environment. Future development
will comply with regulations in effect at that time.
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan?
The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard
Transportation Corridor.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflicts) are:
Not applicable.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NONPROJECT PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be
helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of
the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive
information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
The proposal objective is to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning Map
designations of the property to Office (0).
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives?
There are no alternative means for accomplishing this objective.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action:
Not applicable.
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan?
The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard
Transportation Corridor.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are:
Not applicable.
G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APFISEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00
16
10751.001.doc tHMM \tep]
•
APPENDIX A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TAX LOT NO. 0003200018
That portion of W.H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,
in King County, Washington, described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the
plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington;
THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet;
THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 65 feet;
THENCE South 68° 00' 00" West 155.16 feet;
THENCE North 22° 00' 00" West 127.54 feet to the South line of Tract 27 of said plat of Interurban
Addition to Seattle;
THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along said South line 143.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Situate in the County of King, State of Washington.
TAX LOT NOS. 0003200019 and 0003200017:
That portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4
East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington;
THENCE South 89° 42' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 178.00 feet, more or less, to the Northerly margin of Secondary State
Highway No. 1 -L;
THENCE Northeasterly along said Northerly margin to a point of intersection with the South line of said
Tract 28;
THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said South line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
INCLUDING the following described property:
An easement for roadway and utilities 40 feet wide, being 20 feet in width on each side of the following
described centerline:
BEGINNING at a point on the South line of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the
plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, which is South
89° 47' 00" East, 44.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Tract 28;
THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East to an intersection with the Northerly margin of the Renton -Three Tree
Point Road.
Situate in the County of King, State of Washington.
EXCEPT the following described property:
Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone
December 30, 2002
HMM/ath
107511.001.doc
• •
COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington;
THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of Tract 28, 66.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF.
BEGINNING;
THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East, 152 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly margin of Secondary State
Highway No. 1 -L;
THENCE Northeasterly along said road margin 178.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the
South line of said Tract 28;
THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Source: Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA commitment and King County Auditor's
File Number 9307081653 (Warranty Deed).
Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone
December 30, 2002
HMM/ath
107511.001.doc
1
1M
l'az a iX!i5
-.z
=200m
doi ,,5600ft,
1
•
S <152nd St
"wt}51:52nd Pi
Sa.
Baker Blvd
a
Co
02002 MapQuest.com, Inc.; 02002 Navigation Technobgies
Track Dr '
VICINITY MAP
Atteo
:4Q raimo *1.
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
SOURCE: MAPQUEST.COM.INC.
FIGURE 1
NORTH
ROBB REZONE (BCE #10751)
Tukwila, Washington
• •
SITE PLAN
FIGURE 2
m z
o� Nib
•
<) kG BNG1Na6�
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
NORTH
ROBB REZONE (BCE #10751)
Tukwila, Washington
COPY -
ROBB REZONE
A PORTION OF THE 8E V4 OF BECTON 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 4 E. WM
TTACWCLA. WASHINGTON
NOTES
1 024101322 4430 a 422 Cr lulu mow
iemu 01.1004 *212•• 0204 �mmrn?
1 1 02302 422022701 A 2414 1103213e0.
0006104 14022 401041
4. WI 0 0024 C14 OF Dana C0141221060C
430.2 3 24113 34(as1
4
12/40 2012 0.2241160 fM4014'0003e40
4000 mE 2.• MO OF 300 40014 WM 0111043
nag WM E0424 0004 01104 Dux 1 001 0 01 b11
313311410 1240 111160 0103 1 1113 MM V
• 90002 221 414 144 440 Yb 1004 0031. 040304 1020303 MOM
E
AERIAL PHOTO
Al -Q kNwoo.
BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
SOURCE: DigiAir
NORTH
ROBB REZONE (BCE #10751)
Tukwila, Washington
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
RECEIVED
DEC 31 2002
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
ss
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:
1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the City, its employees, vats, engineers contractors o other r r s.entatives the righ tq entetupon
Owner's real property, located at 65g00 .and 6542 Soi, t 154t i Street, Tu w , WA
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private
property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of
the City.
6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests
for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days.
7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the
application(s) without refund of fees.
EXECUTED at 1 kk. 4j Het_
et_
(city), (state), on 4:2/50/A0042.
1ER/c / O 36
(Print Name) P� Y)a S l p 4 k r1
3�
(Address)
)_ o6 - — S 6 -
(Phone Numbe
��pp (Signature)
On this day personally appeared before me /- �J�(2 ob() to me known to be the individual
who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed
for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. /�,. �� /,
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 30 DAY OF PLaf b ?.1:J , Qi OOa
G`P LJ. JD \1t1� NOTARY
%QQ'�Q ,•c $104/y�j1O 11, residing 4
i .: 0 NOTARY m• 2' Ii,
' PUBLIC y
le
403.... ' 91
'1' °% c)FWAS4'�••_
i
AMP
i
1 :LIC in and fo e State of Washington
My Commission expires on
9-oy
City of Tukwila, ESA Screening Checklist
City of Tukwila
Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist
Date: 12/23/03
RECEIVED
DEC 31 2002
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Applicant Name: Eric Robb c /oc,Barghausen Consulting YEngineers, Inc.
Street Address: 18215 72nd Avenue South
City, State, Zip: Kent, WA 98032
Telephone: 425- 251 -6222
DIRECTIONS
This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in
potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the
Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your
project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully,
circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To
answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical
areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate
your responses to determine if "take" is indicated.
May 24, 2001 1
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project
including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and
ongoing and sche duled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes
answer.
1 -0
Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling,
clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the
existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06,
Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 2 -0
YES - Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3)
2 -0
Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be
removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter
18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response.
Continue to Question 3 -0
YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4)
3 -0
Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water
mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high
water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and
ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly
mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06,
Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 4-0
YES - Continue to Question 3-1 (Page 5)
4 -0
Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous
substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank.
Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance,
product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria
of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter
18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site
during construction. Please circle appropriate response.
0 Continue to Question 5-0
YES - Continue to Question 5-0
5 -0
Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples
of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new
well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged
construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer
lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the
requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not
exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 6-0
YES - Continue to Question 6-0
May 24, 2001
2
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part A (continued)
6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the
regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of
transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover,
and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate
for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -13). For the
purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle
a s i ropriate response.
Checklist Complete
YES — Checklist Complete
Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction,
normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance.
Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
1 -1
Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This
includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will
not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water
mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 1 -2
YES - Continue to Question 1 -2
1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off
site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish
rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in
increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your
project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during
construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your
project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the
preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in
erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question.
Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 1 -3
YES - Continue to Question 1 -3
1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces
include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the
manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a
hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased
rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC
Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to,
rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect
the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle
appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 1 -4
Part B (continued)
May 24, 2001
3
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be
infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater
treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to
seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your
project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a
stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to
this question. , Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question
carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal
operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to
the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
2 -1
Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2 -2
2 -2
Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of
a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as
any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter -
breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle
appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -4
YES - Continue to Question 2 -3
2 -3
Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary
high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of
this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the
fall. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -4
YES - Continue to Question 2 -4
2 -4
Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1)
YES - Continue to Question 2 -5
2 -5
Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)
May 24, 2001
4
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part D: PIe ase review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high
water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to,
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
3 -1
Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the
Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the
area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream
bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both
temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -2
YES - Continue to Question 3-2
3 -2
Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the
Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means"
flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that
allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels,
remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area
that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This
includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications; Watercourses
or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a
flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-3
YES - Continue to Question 3 -3
3 -3
Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be
a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers?
For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or
hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids,
including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-4
YES - Continue to Question 3-4
3 -4
Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the
cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right
bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -5
YES - Continue to Question 3 -5
3 -5
Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris
includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal,
and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal
from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -6
YES - Continue to Question 3-6
May 24, 2001
5
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part D (continued
3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to
another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat
conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside
seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface: water connection
to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under
natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater
support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please
circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-7
YES - Continue to Question 3-7
3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a
watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of
artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature
created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife,
particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3-8
YES - Continue to Question 3-8
3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization
includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete
structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2)
May 24, 2001 6
b Number '
10751.
4MD ENG0N,
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH.
KENT, WA 98032
(425)251 - 6222 FAX
(425)251 -8782 FAX
CML ENGRIEERING, LAND PUNNING,
• SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
o..k
Drown LAS_
abebbeb _JAL
Aav�-
Date 13/24/.47
.n+ • /117,nn'1 new,. CnM.• 1 -511 1.n.v. Y..l.. I07SIM
Hortrobtal
Vertical
LANDSCAPE PLAN
FOR
ROBB. REZONE
O
O
z
m
M • ki
A
°�
4
r1/
*O
Z
CO N
• 4
O 0 •
89 �
C
�� w
s g 3Rd µL
z
i
N3N1:1 N331:10 p i m
A
g;
561 11 A .
014., Rg
•• igig! ;:.-.
•
z
Job Number
10751
•
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH
KENT. WA 98032 •
(425)251 -6222
(425)251 -8782. FAX
CML ENGINEERING, LAND PUNNING,
SURVEYING,ENVIRON/AERI'AL SERVICES
Deihred
ChAckAd
Appeor.d=
fie: P. \100002 \10751\ preGninarA10251pp.dwg Dote/Time 12/31/2002 08113 Scale. 1.50 Imoore Xrde: 21075Ip6
1..•50e .
Vertical
N/A
ERIC ROBB
6542 8. 15TH 8T:
"TUKWILA, WA 98188
SITE PLAN. '
FOR oec .; vnt
ROBB REZ01Ve"°"
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH
KENT. WA 98032
(425)251 -6222
(425)251 -8782 FAX
CN0. D4GMEFXMO. UM PLANNING,
• . SURVEYING, LNViRNMENPI SERVICES
CMG [NOME`