The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E03-006 - FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL - STADIUM RENOVATIONSFOSTER HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM 4242 S 144 STREET E03 -006 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of f Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Carol Lumb Date: March 10, 2003 Re: E03 -006 (SEPA Determination) Foster High School Stadium Renovation Project Description: The renovation of Foster High School stadium by replacing the football field's natural turf with synthetic turf; resurfacing the cinder track with a more modern surface; replacing and enlarging facilities for rest rooms, concessions and storage; replacing the stands on the visitor's side of the field and replacing and updating the press box in the stadium. The project is located on the Foster High School campus at 4242 South 144th Street in Tukwila. As a result of these proposed renovations, access to the field and its facilities on the west side will be improved for emergency vehicles and disabled persons. Agencies with Jurisdiction: Washington State Department of Ecology Other Required Permits: Building permit, demolition permit, clearing and grading permit and sewer permit. Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The topography of the site is generally flat with just a small portion of the site containing slopes of 3:1. The existing sand and gravel soils were placed on the site when it was originally developed as an athletic field. The football field will be graded to accommodate the synthetic turf surface. The fill removed from the field will be used to fill a slope between the field and the high school parking lot to provide wheelchair access. Approximately 5,000 cubic yards of fill will be moved. The applicant will be required to provide a soils evaluation letter reference cut/fill, including on -site access and 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Foster High School Stadium Re1'ifivations E03 -006 SEPA Staff Report • infiltration drywell at the permitting stage. Erosion in the areas being excavated is possible; the project will be required to comply with the City's erosion control regulations. • Air Dust and exhaust emissions will be generated during construction, with watering as necessary to control dust. • Water There are no surface water bodies or wetlands on or near the stadium site. An existing stormwater system collects runoff from impervious surfaces including the track and stadium roof. The stormwater will continue to be collected in the same manner and discharged into the existing system at Showalter Middle School. The project will be required to comply with all City stormwater regulations. All infrastructure will be required to comply with the City of Tukwila's Infrastructure Design Manual. • Plants The natural grass surface of the football field will be replaced by artificial turf. Some landscaping will be added to the entryway of the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species on or near the stadium site. • Animals The site will remain partially native and is near native areas. Many common species of birds may be on the site on occasion. The only wildlife observed on or near the site have been songbirds. No known threatened or endangered species are known to be on or near the project site. The site lies within the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for migratory bird species. • Energy/Natural Resources Construction activities will use electric power, gasoline and diesel internal combustion engines. Electricity will be used for lighting, heating and communications. The concessions /rest room building will be only partially heated. The building will be required to meet State energy code regulations. • Environmental Health Noise generated by construction equipment will occur on a short -term basis. The hours of construction will comply with the City's noise ordinance. After construction is completed, noise will continue to be generated by spectators during sports events. c:\mydocs \Foster H.S. Stadium\sepa - staffrpt.doc 2 Foster High School Stadium Re' vations E03 -006 SEPA Staff Report • Land/Shoreline Use • • The site is currently used as a sports stadium. Adjacent uses include Foster High School, Showalter Middle School, the City of Tukwila indoor pool and St. Thomas Church. Single - family residences are located on the south side of South 144th, across the street from the stadium. The existing restrooms, storage building, concessions, and press box will be demolished and replaced. The current zoning and land use designation are Low Density Residential (LDR). No additional employees are anticipated other than the existing maintenance staff. Housing No housing is proposed nor will any residential structures be removed. Aesthetics The existing stadium is 36 feet in height. The existing light standards are approximately 80 feet in height. The exterior building materials for the proposed concessions /restroom/storage building are split -faced concrete block, with a metal roof intended to match the exterior of the existing stadium. • Light and Glare Existing stadium lights illuminate the athletic field during practice times and games. These lights are typically used during evening hours. Security lighting will be added to the area around the restrooms and concessions, at the request of the police department. These lights will remain on until dawn. • Recreation • • The football stadium is located on the high school campus and is adjacent to the City's pool and school tennis courts and ball fields. The existing track is used for school events as well as by members of the public. Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks exist within the project area. Transportation The stadium is located on South 144th Street in Tukwila, which provides access to the stadium via the high school and middle school parking lots. The site is served by Metro bus route 142, with a bus stop located at the intersection of S. 144th Street and 42nd cAmydocsWoster H.S. Stadium\sepa- staffrpt.doc 3 Foster High School Stadium Rec�Svations E03 -006 SEPA Staff Report • Avenue South. There are currently 151 parking spaces at Foster High School. As the project involves improvements to an existing facility, new vehicle trips would be limited to any possible new users of the facilities. Peak traffic volumes would occur during evening hours when practice times are scheduled or completed and games are played. • Public Services No increase in the need for public services is expected. The applicant will be required to provide access to the east side of the track/field for the Fire Department. • Utilities The project will not increase demand on the utility systems. The stadium will continue to use electricity, water, garbage service, telephone and sanitary sewer services. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance. c:\mydocs \Foster H.S. Stadium\sepa- staffrpt.doc 4 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 27, 2004 Department of Ecology SEPA Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504 -7703 RE: Addendum to DNS Dear Sir or Madam: On March 10, 2003, the City of Tukwila issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) (E03 -006) for renovations to the Foster High School Stadium located at 4242 S. 144th St. Tukwila, Washington (King County Parcel Number 1523049108). The scope of work for the original DNS included: • Replacing the natural turf on the football field with synthetic turf; • Re- surfacing the cinder track with a more modern surface; • Replacing and enlarging facilities for restrooms, concessions, and storage; • Replacing stands on visitor's side of the field; and • Replacing and updating the press box in the stadium On October 4, 2004, the City of Tukwila received a letter on behalf of the Tukwila School District requesting that the City of Tukwila issue an addendum to the previously issued DNS to address the following work: • Installation of additional drainage infrastructure to ensure proper functioning of stormwater system for Foster High School and Showalter Middle School. The applicant will be working on a steep slope and is required to comply with TMC 18.45 (Sensitive Areas Overlay District) and TMC 18.54 (Tree Regulations). However, the City has concluded that the project does not substantially change the prior SEPA analysis of significant impacts and the scope of work for E03 -006 will now include the work proposed in the applicant's October 4, 2004 letter (attached). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • Any questions regarding this project should be directed to Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner at (206) 431 -3684 or bmiles(ci.tukwila.wa.us. Steve Lancaster SEPA Responsible Official cc. Shelley Kerslake, City Attorney Jill Mosqueda, Public Works Ryan Larson, Public Works Jack C. Bjork, RW Beck Department of Fish and Wildlife King County Assessor's Office File (E03 -006) Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION r, I A ,4,„ flrE)dei,HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting C .h rtR P3 f Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt ,- M- Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Person requesting mai 1 i ng : PAA ,,,,,„ n/j ;1 ;, „ , Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 l ` Other Ad\dell4k4,41 Dl Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this day of (Da* in the year 200Li P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: -7--4 ,1,% kt C .h rtR P3 f Project Number: {Q 1?2 -W L Mailer's Signature: ,- M- ( i-C'� Person requesting mai 1 i ng : PAA ,,,,,„ n/j ;1 ;, „ , P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHECKUST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHOREUNE PERMIT MAILINGS • • FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR )D EPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV /EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* () FFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC IKKC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () FIRE () FINANCE () BUILDING ()MAYOR () PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING () PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT () WATER DISTRICT #20 () WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PING PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:ADM IN ISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW 1111LIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR TS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record " send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division _ SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of- Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline Grading Plan Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\A D M INI STRATI V E \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC September 20, 2004 Brandon Miles Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 nliECK Subject: Showalter Middle School Drainage Conveyance Improvements, Wetlands Observations Dear Brandon: Last week you and I discussed the proposed pipeline that would address drainage problems for the Showalter Middle School. Perhaps you recall that the proposed project consists of two pipeline sections, the first section is a 350 linear foot buried pipeline along the baseball field of Showalter Middle School, and the second section is a 500 linear foot surface pipeline down the 30 percent hill slope to S. Macadam Road. The purpose of this letter is to present information regarding vegetation and soil conditions found at the pipeline site, based on observations made during the field staking of the pipeline alignment on September 2nd. As indicated below, based on the vegetative species identified and the soil conditions found, it does not appear that any portion of the pipeline site would be properly classified as wetland. The first section crosses a grass ball field on the school grounds with under drains and irrigation underlain by fill. The second section goes down the steep hillslope. Stationing begins at the bottom of the slope. The upper half of the alignment (station 2 +50 to 5 +00) lies along a ridgeline. As we located the pipeline alignment, I made the following observations regarding plants and soil present in this portion of the pipeline. I have gained knowledge of northwest native plants during my 28 year career involving creek, river and drainage projects. The alignment is almost completely dominated by invasive species. Soil moisture reflects a week with the only measurable rainfall in the past week occurring Thursday (0.17 "). Location Plants Soil 0 +00 to 0 +13 None Quarry spalls over replaced landslide material 0 +13 to 0+ 70 No canopy. Red alder, bracken fern, stinging nettle, grass sp., big leaf maple, Himalayan blackberry, trailing blackberry, and western dock Replaced soil from 2003 landslide.. Moist. 0 +70 Begin complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry. Canopy red alder 1 +00 . Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry. Canopy red alder dry 1 +08 English ivy, sword fern and Himalayan blackberry Moist 1 +23 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry . 1 +45 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Sandy dry soil R:\ Seattle\ 011247 \11 - 00969 - 10000 - 0002\2001 \Transmittal Miles 092004.doc 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98154 -1004 Phone (206) 695 -4700 Fax (206) 695 -4701 Brandon Miles September 20. 2004 Page 2 a'vJ'BE CK Location Plants 1 Soil 1 +70 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Sandy moist soil 1 +90 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Sandy moist soil 2 +15 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Sandy dry soil • 2 +32 Complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Sandy damp soil 2 +60 End complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry 2 +64 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy and moss understory. No Himalayan blackberry Sandy damp soil 2 +80 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy understory 3 +00 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy, Oregon grape and sword fern understory Sandy dry soil 3 +35 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy and sword fern understory Sandy damp soil 3 +40 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy, Himalayan blackberry and Oregon grape understory 3 +70 Beaked hazelnut canopy with ivy, Himalayan blackberry and Oregon grape understory 4 +00 Beaked hazelnut and elderberry canopy with ivy, Himalayan blackberry and Oregon grape understory 4 +05 Begin steep slope (toe of fill) 4 +10 Begin complete ground coverage with Japanese knotweed 4 +60 End complete ground coverage with Japanese knotweed and begin complete ground coverage by Himalayan blackberry Top of steep slope (top of fill) 5 +10 End Himalayan blackberry and begin turf You will also be receiving a report from the geotechnical engineer, Zipper Zeman and Associates, describing soil conditions in more detail. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, R.W. BECK, INC. ick C. Bjork, .E. roject Manager JCB /ato R:\Seattle \011247 \11 - 00969 - 10000- 0002\2001 Transmittal Miles 092004.doc :` ? .`y ' Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. Geotechnical and Environmental Consulting L L R.W. Beck, Inc. 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, Washington 98154 Attention: Mr. Jack Bjork, P.E. Subject: Limited Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Evaluation Showalter Middle School to Macadam Road Tightline 4628 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Bjork, J -1961 September 20, 2004 Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. (ZZA) is pleased to present a copy of the above - referenced report. This report presents the results of our limited subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering evaluation relative to geologic hazards for the proposed project. Authorization to proceed with this study was provided by Mr. Jack Bjork by acceptance of our August 24, 2004 proposal: Our work was completed in general accordance with the scope of services described in the referenced proposal letter. The purpose of the study was to perform a geologic reconnaissance and limited subsurface explorations along a proposed tightline stormwater pipeline alignment that will traverse a slope between the upper playfields of Showalter Middle School at the west and Macadam Road at the base of the slope at the east. Due to the sloping nature of the site, we understand the Tukwila Planning and Community Development Department requests a geotechnical report that meets City of Tukwila requirements as stated in Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.45, Sensitive Areas Overlay. Our scope of services consisted of a geologic reconnaissance, limited field explorations, geotechnical engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. This report is an instrument of service and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are in respect to the subject property and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of R.W. Beck, Inc., and its agents, for specific application to this project and the stated purpose. In the event of any changes in the nature, design, or location of the proposed improvements, the preliminary conclusions and recommendations presented in this report should be reviewed and modified, if necessary, to reflect the changes. 18905 33 "d Avenue West #117, Lynnwood, WA 98036 (425) 771 -3304 Fax: (425) 771-3549 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION Macadam Road Tightline 3 -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 2 The proposed pipeline alignment includes the eastern perimeter of the upper playfield of Showalter Middle School and a slope to the east that extends through an undeveloped area to Macadam Road near the base of the slope. The proposed approximate 500 -foot long alignment will begin and end in manhole structures. At this preliminary stage, we understand that the tightline will be a 12 -inch diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe that will exit the upper playfield slope at a depth of approximately 7 feet and be anchored surficiallyala�ng the sl pe. Near the base of the slope the pipeline will go below gra a to connect to the lower manhole structure at Macadam Road. SITE CONDITIONS The site conditions were evaluated in September 2004. The surface and subsurface conditions are described below, while the exploration procedures and interpretive logs of the explorations are presented in Appendix A. The existing site features and approximate exploration locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. Surface Conditions Surface conditions were assessed during a geologic reconnaissance conducted on September 9, 2004. The intent of the reconnaissance was to identify surficial features along the proposed pipeline alignment that may be indicative of geologic hazards, and to locate occurrences of groundwater seepage along the slope. The approximate elevation at the top of slope at the west end of the alignment is 263 feet, and 130 feet at the bottom of the slope. The entire alignment has an approximate overall inclination of 3.3H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical), or approximately 33 percent. The alignment includes an upper segment from approximately elevation 263 feet to 240 feet on a 1.6H:1V (63 percent) slope, and a lower segment from approximately elevation 240 feet to 130 feet on a 3.6H:1 V (28percent) slope. The proposed pipeline alignment was previously brush cleared, flagged and staked at 100 foot intervals by others. Alignment stationing commenced at the top of the slope within the east perimeter of the grass playfield at the staked Station 5 +15, with station values decreasing downslope and to the east. A summary of our geologic reconnaissance follows. Station 5 +15 to Station 4+40 From Station 5 +15 to Station 5 +00, the alignment comprised the eastern perimeter of the school's grass playfield. From Station 5 +00 to Station 4 +40, the generally level alignment was thickly vegetated with blackberry brambles. The upper playfield fill pad appeared generally stable with no visible ground cracking, irregular terraces, or evidence of downslope movement. J- 1961 -Tuk LaAFT Macadam Road Tlghtline ] -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 3 Hand probing and shallow excavations disclosed up to two feet of loose silty sand with some gravel and scattered construction debris. No groundwater seepage was observed. Station 4 +40 to Station 4 +00 A slope on the order of 1.6H:1 V with an elevation change of approximately 23 feet characterized this alignment interval. The slope was thickly vegetated with surface brush including blackberry brambles, ivy and scattered small trees. Landscape debris and scattered construction debris including concrete, asphalt, wood and metal were noted along the slope. The upper fill slope did not disclose evidence of instability or indications of movement. Groundwater seepage was not observed. Hand auger boring HA -1 was advanced near Station 4 +00. Station 4 +00 to Station 3 +00 This alignment interval appeared to be the original native slope area that was not subject to filling for the upper playfield and school development. The slope was generally mild along this segment with approximately 20 feet of relief for the 100 feet in distance. Scattered moderate to large trees including cedar, fir and maple were present. The alignment along this area followed a ridge —like feature. Surface drainage features were noted to parallel this ridge feature to the north and south of the alignment. Groundwater seepage was not observed. Hand auger boring HA -2 was advanced near Station 3 +00. Station 3 +00 to Station 2 +00 Thick surface brush including blackberry brambles and ivy were observed along this interval with scattered moderate size cedar, fir and alder trees. The ridge -like feature continued along this segment and the elevation change was approximately 35 feet. The drainage features continued to parallel the alignment on the north and south. Groundwater seepage was not observed. Hand auger boring HA -3 was advanced near Station 2 +00. Station 2 +00 to Station 1 +00 Scattered moderate size cedar, fir, alder and maple trees were observed along this segment, along with thick brush. There was approximately 35 feet of relief along this 100 foot long segment. The drainage feature to the south of the alignment disclosed some limited surficial flow. The slight flow entered a quarry spall lined ditch near Station 1 +00. We did not observe groundwater seepage. Hand auger boring HA-4 was advanced near Station 1+00. Station 1 +00 to Station 0 +00 This alignment segment consisted of thick brush and scattered small to moderate size trees from approximately Station 1+00 to 0 +50. There was approximately 25 feet of relief along the entire 100 foot segment. Approximately the eastern 50 feet of the alignment appeared to have been cleared in the past and filled. The fill appeared to have been excavated from the quarry J- 1961 -Tuk FT Macadam Road Tightline 3 -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 4 spall Lined drainage ditch to the south and mounded to the north in the area of the proposed pipeline alignment. We observed that the slope adjacent to Macadam Road was quarry spall surfaced. Probing at the surface of the probable filled area noted approximately 1 to 2.5 feet of upper loose conditions. We did not observe groundwater seepage. We observed an approximate 6 -foot high, near - vertical cut bank at the south side of the quarry spall lined drainage ditch, south of the proposed alignment. The exposure disclosed medium dense to dense weathered glacial till. Subsurface Conditions The limited subsurface exploration program consisted of advancing four shallow hand auger borings (HA -1, HA -2, HA -3 and HA -4) at the approximate locations shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. Soil descriptions presented in this report are based on the subsurface conditions encountered at specific exploration locations across the site. Variations in subsurface conditions may exist between the exploration locations. The regional geology of the site area was reviewed in the Preliminary Geologic Map of Seattle and Vicinity, Washington (U.S.G.S. Map I -354) compiled in 1962 by Waldron. The site area is classified as modified land which has been altered by cutting and filling. It appears that Showalter Middle School and Foster High School, and the associated athletic playfields, were developed by cutting at the west and filling to the east. The subject slope at the east side of the playfield was apparently filled. Vashon lodgement glacial till has been mapped below the modified land. We interpret the slope below the upper fill slope to consist of the till deposits. The Vashon till is a glacially consolidated mixture of silt, sand, gravel, cobbles, and boulders. Subsurface conditions as disclosed by our shallow hand auger soil boring explorations completed for this study on the lower slope generally confirmed the presence of the soils described on the geologic map. H. r borings HA -1 through HA-4 encountered approximately 0.5 feet of topsoil atop a • . se ur:. ' . g medium dense, silty sand with some gravel and roots to a depth of approximately 1 to 1.5 feet. Medium dense silty sand with some gravel was encountered below the near - surface looser soil to approximately 1.75 to 2.5 feet in depth. The explorations encountered dense silty sand with some gravel, interpreted as weathered glacial till, to the explorations' termination depths. The hand auger borings met refusal due to gravels at depths of 4 feet in HA -1 and 3.2 feet in HA -2, HA -3 and HA -4. Groundwater was observed only at the location of hand auger boring HA -1 at a depth of approximately 3.2 feet. We have interpreted this groundwater occurrence to represent a perched condition, and not an area -wide groundwater table. Though we did not encounter groundwater seepage in the other exploration, we would anticipate that perched groundwater conditions could develop during the wetter times of the year on the slope above the fill and also above the less permeable, dense unweathered glacial till. It should be noted that groundwater conditions and soil moisture contents will likely vary with changes in season, precipitation, site utilization, irrigation, and other on- and off -site factors. J- 1961 -Tuk ZZA inumegabasom CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Macadam Road Tlghtline J -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 5 The proposed stormwater outfall will consist of a 12 -inch diameter HDPR tightline. The pipeline alignment includes the eastern perimeter of the upper playfield of Showalter Middle School and traverses to the east down the slope of an undeveloped area to Macadam Road near the base of the slope. The proposed approximate 500 feet of alignment will begin and end in manhole structures. The upper end of the outfall will exit the upper playfield slope at a depth of approximately 7 feet. Most of the tightline will be installed on the ground surface. Near the base of the slope the pipeline will go below grade to connect to the lower manhole structure at Macadam Road. The proposed project is feasible from the geotechnical perspective, in our opinion. A summary of regulated geologic hazard and tightline anchorage considerations is presented below. Regulated Geologic Hazards As described in the Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.45.020E, Areas of Potential Geologic Instability are described under Class 1 through Class 4. Based on our geologic reconnaissance, review of geologic maps and limited subsurface explorations, we would classify the proposed pipeline alignment slope as a Class 2 area. Class 2 areas are described as slopes where the landslide potential is moderate, the slope is between 20 percent and 40 percent, and the area is underlain by relatively permeable soils. The topographic survey provided for our review, as well as our site observations, confirm the slope inclination. Soils disclosed by the explorations and our site observations confirmed the presence of relatively permeable weathered glacial till above less permeable and denser glacial till. The slope below the athletic field at the upper western end of the alignment consists of fill material. The geologic reconnaissance completed along the proposed pipeline alignment did not disclose evidence of landsliding or significant surface water erosion. We did not observe any seepage or wet areas along the surface of the alignment. The proposed tightline installation will require only minor excavation at the top and bottom of the slope in order to connect the pipe to the manhole structures. The portion of the pipe that is installed on the ground surface will be anchored. Based on our observations, the proposed pipeline installation project will not increase the potential for soil movement, in our opinion. Geotechnical report requirements are described in Section 4 of Chapter 18.45.080E, Areas of Potential Geologic Instability. For a Class 2 site, geotechnical reports shall include a site evaluation review, surface reconnaissance and subsurface exploration of site conditions, if deemed necessary. Based upon our site observations and our interpretation of the code, it is our opinion that the contents of this report meet the code requirements for a Class 2 landslide hazard area. J- 1961 -Tuk Pipe Anchorage Considerations FT Macadam Road Tightline ) -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 6 The upper end of the tightline should be adequately anchored to the manhole structure. We recommend that the pipe manufacturer or contractor provide a tensile and shear connection between the structure and the outfall pipe which will prevent the pipe from pulling out. Similarly, the wall of the structure must be of adequate strength to withstand the loading imposed by the outfall pipe. A typical connection will consist of a flange adaptor with a grooved lip and a two piece steel clamp mortared into the structure. We recommend securing the portion of the pipe that is placed on the ground surface with an anchor spacing no less than 50 feet. We recommend placing the pipe within prefabricated metal collars that allow longitudinal pipe movement (to compensate for elongation and contraction due to temperature fluctuations) but that do not allow lateral movement. The collars should be secured to the ground by driving No. 12 steel reinforcing bars into the ground on either side of the pipe. We recommend driving the bars at least 6 inches into the underlying dense unweathered glacial till. CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you, and we hope this report meets your current needs. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Respectfully Submitted, Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. i t� Curt R. Thompson, P.G. Senior Geologist John E. Zipper, P.E. President Enclosure: Figure 1 — Site and Exploration Plan Appendix A- Field Exploration Procedures and Logs J- 1961 -Thk Macadam Road Tightllne ) -1961 September 20, 2004 Page 7 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION PROCEDURES AND LOGS Our field exploration for this project included advancing four hand auger borings (HA -1 through HA -4) on September 9, 2004. The approximate exploration locations are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 1. The exploration locations were determined by measuring distances from existing staked stationing which was also presented on a plan provided by R.W. Beck. Exploration elevations were interpolated from topographic information provided on the R.W. Beck plan. The exploration locations and elevations should be considered as accurate as the degree implied by the measurement method. The following section describes our procedures associated with the exploration. Descriptive logs of the explorations (HA -1 through HA -4) are enclosed in this appendix. Hand Auger Boring Procedures An engineering geologist from our firm advanced a 3 -inch diameter auger by hand, continuously observing the soil cuttings as they were retrieved. Representative soil samples were retrieved and were stored in moisture -tight containers and transported to our laboratory for further visual classification and testing. The enclosed boring logs describe the vertical sequence of soils and materials encountered in each boring, based primarily upon our field classifications and supported by our subsequent laboratory examination. Where a soil contact was observed to be gradational, our log indicates the average contact depth. Where a soil type changed between sample intervals, we inferred the contact depth. We estimated the relative density and consistency of in situ soils by means of the excavation characteristics and by the sidewall stability. The logs also indicate the approximate depths of any sidewall caving or groundwater seepage observed at the exploration locations, as well as all sample numbers and sampling locations. J- 1961 -Tuk Hand Auger Boring HA -1 Protect: Macadam Road Tightline Project No: J -1961 Date Excavated: 9 -9 -04 Location: Station 3 +95, HDPE alignment. Approximate Elevation: 240 feet Depth (ft) Material Description No Sample Testing Surface brush over Topsoil 1 " Irooselo medium Sense, moist,brown, silty SAND vivith some gravel and roots Medium dense, moist to wet, mottled brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel 2 S -1 3 Dense , wet, mottled brown-gray gr y to gray, silty SAND with some gravel (weathered glacial till) S-2 4 Refusal atop gravels at 4.0 feet. HA -1 completed at 4.0 feet on 9/9/04. Groundwater seepage observed at 3.2 feet. Hand Auger Boring FIA -2 Project: Macadam Road Tightline Project No: J -1961 Date Excavated: 9 -9 -04 Location: Station 3 +00, HDPE alignment. Approximate Elevation: 218 feet Depth (ft) Material Description Nc Sample Testing Surface brush over Topsoil 1 Loose, damp, tan- brown, silty SAND with some gravel and roots Medium dense, damp, tan- brown, silty SAND with some gravel and roots Dense, moist, brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel (weathered glacial till) 2 S -1 3 Refusal atop gravels at 3.2 feet. HA -2 completed at 3.2 feet on 9/9/04. Groundwater seepage not observed at time of exploration. 4 Hand Auger Boring HA -3 Project: Macadam Road Tightline Project No: J -1961 Date Excavated: 9 -9 -04 Location: Station 1 +90, HDPE alignment. Approximate Elevation: 183 feet Depth (ft) Material Description Nc Sample Testing Surface brush over Topsoil. 1 Loose to medium dense, damp, brown, silty SAND with some gravel and roots Medium dense, moist, brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel Dense, moist, mottled brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel (weathered glacial till) J 2 S -1 3 S-2 Refusal atop gravels at 3.2 feet. HA -3 completed at 3.2 feet on 9/9/04. Groundwater seepage not observed at time of exploration. 4 Rand Aueer Borine HA-4 Project: Macadam Road Tightline Project No: J -1961 Date Excavated: 9 -9 -04 Location: Station 0 +80, HDPE alignment. Approximate Elevation: 152 feet Depth (ft) Material Description Nc Sample Testing Surface brush over Topsoil Loose, damp, tan- brown, silty SAND with some gravel, organics and roots Medium dense, moist, brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel 1 S -1 2 3 Dense, moist, brown -gray, silty SAND with some gravel (weathered glacial till) S-2 Refusal atop gravels at 3.2 feet. HA-4 completed at 3.2 feet on 9/9/04. Groundwater seepage not observed at time of exploration. 4 03 L. 0 0' 0 0' 4. 9. 0 s. 4. 9. t. 110 ra • a .0 1-• c a, 3 0 19 9. VI 4. 4. 9. fel •3 c 0 In 4. c 0. 3 u 0 .0" • — NE 266.2 I C l 1 1 N armr.35‘ /165.9129.06 04.0 124.9a 9. 9. 984.926:54 E (96.5) 129.52 HA- 00 55 MOONY L-26.6. 0.1.0 HA-2 HA-4 as • 3-1-0 12. RCP g d+00% E 1 E 1 6:8 6:6 RIM 269 262.01 E SW 26 • N 263.75 6:6 SW 75 60 100 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET Zipper Zeman Associates, Inc. Oeotechnical and Environmental Consulting 18905 33rd Avenue West, Suite 117 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Tele: (425) 771-3304 Fax (425) 771-3549 N LEGEND: 6) HA-1 HAND AUGER BORING NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION Project No: J-1961 Drawn br.J. Duncan Date: Sept, 2004 Scale: As Noted Macadam Road Tightlina Showalter Middle School Tukwila, Washington FIGURE 1 - SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN Basemap DWG Fife Provided by RW. BECK INC. and modified by ZZA MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Carol Lumb, Senior Planner C> FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson DATE: March 5, 2003 SUBJECT: Foster High School Stadium Renovations 4242 S. 144th Street SEPA and Miscellaneous Comments SEPA — E03 -006 SEPA is complete for Public Works, if the following comments are addressed. The environmental checklist should be revised or verified, as follows: B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth f. Yes, (describe) 2. Air c. Add - Dust control note on civil site plan sheet 5. Animals a. birds — The site will remain partially native and is near native areas. Many common species of birds may be on the site on occasion. c. Yes — This area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for migratory bird species. General comment - The Environmental Checklist is signed, but not dated. Miscellaneous Comments 1. Apply for Building Permit. Public Works activities shall include Land Altering, on -site access, storm drainage, and TESC. 2. Driveway grade shall not exceed 15 %. 3. Provide soils evaluation letter reference cut/fill, including on -site access and infiltration drywell. 4. Provide design and construction per City of Tukwila, Infrastructure Design Manual — available at Public Works Department. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E03 -006 Applied: 02/05/2003 Issue Date: 03/10/2003 Status: ISSUED Proponent: TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: RENNOVATIONS TO FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL STADIUM Location of Proposal: Address: 4242 S 144 ST TUKW Parcel Number: 1523049108 Section /Township /Range: 15 -23 -04 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). -;nir The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: Miscperm E03 -006 Printed: 03 -10 -2003 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1-, Gt,5'L /- HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: 7Zk'& /LA4 $A',OL- J /STeic% Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt O f RA L, Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application • Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /2 T1" day of MOANrin the HcN year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: 7Zk'& /LA4 $A',OL- J /STeic% Project Number: ED 7 _ 0042 Mailer's Signature: 2-• C7. Person requesting mailing: O f RA L, P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CH.IST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PE. MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ()TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE / TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT J ( TUKWILA LIBRARY O RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE K C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR 14}4.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ./FOSTER LIBRARY K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE v' VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE" " NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES JPUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE J ( 4MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 7/ b4 CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ✓ ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ./ po WILDLIFE PROGRAM () SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATI V E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC MEDIA J DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE '() .S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW od e Diutt44 laVM& 1 310D 1..a,c,(4.45 Ow Li 0, 3 4/1.4-OnA-&1 1 gw2q PUIOC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PEROTS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINI STRATI VE \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) 1 17:.12.\ `Nt 7 (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on c2/6/20O 3 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 4Z4'Z S. /6' I'>'' s-7- so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number £, 7ZZ —DO(p . I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Applicant or ' o' anage On this day personally appeared before me i1/4(.— to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /tie signed the same as his/I voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 014+ day NOTAR ' UBLIC in an or the State of Washington residing at ‘k-0-\ My commission expires on s - lck Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /, t e,SL /E HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: .0.3- 10040 Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: C/ koi__ Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda >( Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was ma i l ed 'to each of the addresses listed on this /aim day o f F,EB in the year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: o gyre,' ///c7// C OfOL 5T7Dft)M Project Number: .0.3- 10040 Mailer's Signature: t.. G-7 , Person requesting mailing: C/ koi__ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHEST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PE. MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC ( ) K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ' TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT �f UKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS ' FIRE POLICE ( ) FINANCE ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR K C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES (FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 () WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES UGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE �� Y yj MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE - U^"'"�� ° ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM j / () FISHERIES PROGRAM ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA () SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATI V E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC XDUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CLTUKWILA.WA.US.WWW L zI L� � 4 Pepttc ot&. spy PUIOC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PEI41/ITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATI V E \FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Erik Sweet, David Evans & Associates on behalf of the Tukwila School District has filed an application for environmental review for renovations to the Foster High School Stadium and athletic field, located at 4242 South 144th Street. Permits applied for include: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) application Other known required permits include: Land Altering, Building Permit Studies required with the applications include: None. An environmental checklist has been submitted. The renovations include replacing the natural turf with synthetic turf on the football field; resurfacing the cinder track with a more modern surface; replacing and enlarging facilities for restrooms, concessions and storage; replacing the stands on the visitor's side of the field; and replacing and updating the press box in the stadium. `FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUB;LIC,REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: E03 -006 OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Friday, February 28, 2003. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The decision on the SEPA determination for this project is made by the Director of the Department of Community Development and may be appealed to King County Superior Court. The decisions on the land altering and building permits may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. For further information on this proposal, contact Carol Lumb at (206) 431 -3661 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: February 5, 2003 Notice of Completeness Issued: February 13, 2003 Notice of Application Issued: February 14, 2003 Page 2 Kin g Lounty Department De artment of Assessments Parcel 152304 - 9108 Computer : COUNTER 35 01/30/2003 Land Designations Historic Site : Nbr Bldg : 0 Adj. to Golf Fairway : No Adj. to Greenbelt : No Other : No Deed Restriction : No Environmental Restrictions ( None ) Building 1 Description : FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Predominent Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) Construction Class : Masonry Sprinklers : Y # of Stories : 2 Net Sq. Feet : 125,403 Effective Year : 1992 Address : 4242 S 144TH ST Section of Building 1 Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) # of Stories : 2 Gross Sq. Feet : 74,856 Section of Building 1 Use : Auditorium (302) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 50,547 Building 2 Description : SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Predominent Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) Construction Class : Masonry Sprinklers : N # of Stories : 2 Net Sq. Feet : 69,134 Effective Year : 1939 Address : Section of Building 2 Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) # of Stories : 2 Gross Sq. Feet : 69,134 Current Use : (None) Dev. Rights Purchases : No Easements : No Native Growth : No DNR Lease : No # of Buildings Aggregated : 1 Shape : Rect Or Slight Irreg Quality : Average Elevators : Gross Sq. Feet : 125,403 Year Built : 1991 % Complete : 100 Heating System : Warmed And Cooled Air Description : ACADEMICS BLDG Story Height : 15 Floor Nbr : Description : ACTIVITIES BLDG Story Height : 31 Floor Nbr : # of Buildings Aggregated : 1 Shape : Rect Or Slight Irreg Quality : Average Elevators : Gross Sq. Feet : 69,134 Year Built : 1939 % Complete : 100 Heating System : Hot Water Description : Story Height : 12 Floor Nbr : cont on page 3 Page 3 King Runty Department artment of Assessme• Parcel 152304 - 9108 Computer : COUNTER 35 01/30/2003 Building 3 Description : SHOWALTER GYM & MUSIC BLDGS Predominent Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) Construction Class : Masonry Sprinklers : N # of Stories : 1 Net Sq. Feet : 29,186 Effective Year : 1970 Address : Section of Building 3 Use : Auditorium (302) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 8,760 Feature of Section Type : Mezzanines- Storage (763) Net Sq. Feet : 560 Section of Building 3 Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 7,322 Section of Building 3 Use : Elementary School (Entire) (365) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 12,544 Building 4 Description : PUBLIC LIBRARY & ADMIN BLDGS Predominent Use : Office Building (344) Construction Class : Masonry Sprinklers : N # of Stories : 1 Net Sq. Feet : 5,330 Effective Year : 1970 Address : Section of Building 4 Use : Library, Public (337) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 2,400 # of Buildings Aggregated : 1 Shape : Rect Or Slight Irreg Quality : Average Elevators : Gross Sq. Feet : 29,186 Year Built : 1964 % Complete : 100 Heating System : Forced Air Unit Description : Story Height : 20 Floor Nbr : Gross Sq. Feet : 560 Description : Story Height : 12 Floor Nbr : Description : Story Height : 18 Floor Nbr : # of Buildings Aggregated : 1 Shape : Rect Or Slight Irreg Quality : Average Elevators : Gross Sq. Feet : 5,330 Year Built : 1957 % Complete : 100 Heating System : Forced Air Unit Description : Story Height : 12 Floor Nbr : cont. on page 4 Page 1 Kingtounty Department of Assessme• Parcel 152304 - 9108 Computer : COUNTER 35 Parcel Geo Area : 70 -10 Spec Area : 0 -0 Folio : 20670A Resp : C Block : FEB 0 -6 2003 COMMUNITY Res Area : DEVEL0F..; . T Q -S -T -R : SE- 15 -23 -4 Type : C Levy : 2413 Lot : 01/30/2003 Property Desc : FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL ETC Property Address : 4242 S 144TH ST TUKWILA Legal Desc : W 500 FT OF S 629.84 FT OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 & S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 LESS W 190 FT OF E 565 FT OF S 320 FT LESS CO RDS TaxPaver Accounts Account Change 152304 - 9108 -04 1 SOUTH CENTRAL SCH DIST 406 657777 Land HBU If Vacant : Educational Service Present Use : School(Public) Percent Unused : 0 Zoning Date : 09/03/1996 Sewer System : Public Corner Lot : Yes Base Land Val : 1,084,200 Tax Year : 2004 Parking : Adequate Land Views Mt Rainier : Olympics : Cascades : Territorial : Seattle : Land Waterfront Location : Bank : Tide /Shore : Restricted : Lot Depth Factor : 0 Land Nuisances /Problems Topography : Traffic Noise : Airport : 0 Trans. Concurrency : No HBU As Improved : Present Use Traffic Volume : 0 Current Zoning : LDR Water System : Water District Lot SqFt : 1,073,318 Restrictive Size /Shape : No Land Val Date : 01/14/2003 Road Access : Public Street Surface : Paved Sound : Lake Washington : Lake Sammamish : Lake /River /Creek : Other : Access Rights : No Proximity Influence : No Poor Quality : No Footage : 0 Powerlines : No Other : No Water Problems : No Other : No Cont. on page 2 Page 4 King Runty Department of Assessme. Parcel 152304 - 9108 Computer : COUNTER 35 01/30/2003 Section of Building 4 Use : Office Building (344) # of Stories : 1 Gross Sq. Feet : 2,930 Accessories Miscellaneous Description : GRANDSTAND Size : 0 Grade : (Unknown) % Net Condition : 0 Date Valued : 01/01/1900 Miscellaneous Description : CONCESSION AND REST ROOMS Size : 860 Grade : Average Net Condition : 0 Date Valued : 01/01/1900 Miscellaneous Description : GARAGES Size : 2320 Grade : Average % Net Condition : 0 Date Valued : 01/01/1900 Value History for Acct 152304 -- 910 -04 Tax Omit Appr Appr Appr Appr Land Imps Total Yr Yr Land Imps Total Imp Incr Val Val Val 2003 0 1,084,200 14,756,600 15,840,800 0 0 0 0 2002 0 1,084,200 14,574,200 15,658,400 0 0 0 0 2001 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 2000 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 1999 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 1999 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 1998 0 0 0 0 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 1997 0 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 1995 0 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 1993 0 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,742,500 14,815,800 1991 0 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 2,008,300 3,081,600 1991 0 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 3,167,300 4,240,600 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1989 0 0 0 0 0 536,600 3,974,000 4,510,600 1987 0 0 0 0 0 369,600 3,974,000 4,343,600 1985 0 0 0 0 0 369,600 3,974,000 4,343,600 1983 0 0 0 0 0 308,000 3,724,500 4,032,500 Description : Story Height : 9 Floor Nbr : Quantity : 0 Unit of Measure : Eff Year : 0 Value : 0 Quantity : 0 Unit of Measure : Sqft Eff Year : 0 Value : 0 Quantity : 2 Unit of Measure : Sqft Eff Year : 0 Value : 0 Tax Val Reason Ex Ex Ex Ex Ex Ex Note 1 Date : 01/01/1900 12:00 AM By : Note : 40X50 METAL GARAGE 16X20 METAL GARAGE Levy Change Change Status Code Date Number Reason X 2413 09/18/2002 X 2413 06/07/2001 X 2413 08/30/2000 X 2413 07/14/1999 X 2413 09/17/1998 X 2413 04/18/1998 X 2413 08/01/1997 X 2413 08/30/1996 X 2413 04/15/1994 X 2413 07/17/1992 X 2413 08/24/1990 X 2413 07/27/1990 X 2413 12/13/1989 X 4611 12/22/1988 X 4630 02/12/1988 X 4630 06/27/1986 X 4630 07/05/1984 X 4630 03/20/1982 Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue o Revalue R470000 Extension Revalue Revalue Revalue Maintenance Maintenance Revalue Levy Code Chng Levy Code Chng Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue cont on page 5 Page 5 King Runty Department of Assessmel Parcel 152304 - 9108 Computer : COUNTER 35 01/30/2003 Note 2 Date : Note : Tax Roll By : Acct Bill Omit Levy Appr Appr Appr Imps Tax Tax Tax Acct Nbr Type Year Year Code Land Imps Total Increase Land Imps Total Status Reason Status 152304 - 9108 -04 R 2003 0 2413 1,084,200 14,756,600 15,840,800 0 0 0 0 X EX A 152304- 9108 -04 R 2002 0 2413 1,084,200 14,574,200 15,658,400 0 0 0 0 X EX A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 2001 0 2413 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 X EX A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 2000 0 2413 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 X EX A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 1999 0 2413 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 0 0 0 X EX A 152304- 9108 -04 R 1998 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 X A 152304- 9108 -04 R 1997 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 X A 152304- 9108 -04 R 1996 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 X A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 1995 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 X A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 1994 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,742,500 14,815,800 X A 152304 - 9108 -04 R 1993 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 13,742,500 14,815,800 X A 152304- 9108 -04 R 1992 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 2,008,300 3,081,600 X A 152304- 9108 -04 R 1991 0 2413 0 0 0 0 1,073,300 2,008,300 3,081,600 X A Appraisals Roll Land Imps Total Imps Appr Post Post RM Year Value Value Value Incr Method Reason Appr Date Status Date R 2003 1,084,200 14,756,600 15,840,800 0 RCNLD Revalue JCOL 04/30/2002 Posted 09/16/2002 R 2002 1,084,200 14,574,200 15,658,400 0 RCNLD Revalue JCOL 02/22/2001 Posted 06/07/2001 R 2001 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 PREV APPR Revalue JCOL 05/09/2000 Posted 08/30/2000 R 2000 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 PREV APPR Revalue JCOL 05/03/1999 Posted 07/14/1999 R 1999 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 PREV APPR Revalue 04/30/1998 Posted 09/17/1998 R 1998 1,084,200 13,796,000 14,880,200 0 INCOME Revalue - Physlnsp JCOL 04/08/1997 Posted 07/28/1997 R 1997 1,073,300 13,806,900 14,880,200 0 PREV APPR Revalue- AnnlUpdt JCOL 08/22/1996 Posted 08/26/1996 110 RECEu`V�ED. FEB 05 2003 SEPA CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development COFMIMUTYENVIRONMENTAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEVELOPMENT NI REVIEW VIE W Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Foster High School Stadium Renovations LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, ijvacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 4242 South 144th Street (on the campus of Foster High School) Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: Erik Sweet, I'SLA David Evans and Associates, Inc; 3700 Pacific Hwy. E, Suite 311, Tacoma, WA 98424 253 - 922 -9780 FAX: 253- 922 -9781 Signature: G: WPPHAN'LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: 2/3/03 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: F%r,?_d(e Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Foster High School Stadium Renovations LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, ijvacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 4242 South 144th Street (on the campus of Foster High School) Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: Erik Sweet, I'SLA David Evans and Associates, Inc; 3700 Pacific Hwy. E, Suite 311, Tacoma, WA 98424 253 - 922 -9780 FAX: 253- 922 -9781 Signature: G: WPPHAN'LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 06/16/00 Date: 2/3/03 r. • • Nora Gierloff Brandon Miles Tukwila School District 4640 South 144th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 Pre-c)a 0.40 3 _Dom fi'V JECK ECE VED OCT 0 4 2004 TUKWILA Subject: Addendum to 2003 SEPA/ Determination of Non - Significa nce PUBLIC WORKS Showalter Middle School/Foster High School Field Improvements Storm Drainage Improvements Proposed SEPA Addendum In 2003 the Tukwila School District applied for and received review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the permits necessary for renovation of the Foster High School football field. As described in the SEPA Checklist prepared for the project, the field was converted in 2003 to artificial surfacing and underdrains were installed to collect runoff from the football field. Collected runoff from both the football field and Showalter Middle School were then directed toward the east side of the school site to an infiltration system that disperses stormwater near the top of the steep slope. The District now wishes to supplement the drainage system installed in 2003. Because the District's proposal involves additional analysis about drainage infrastructure necessary for proper functioning of the Foster High School field and Showalter Middle School facilities, but does not substantially change prior SEPA analysis of significan t impacts resulting from field construction, the District proposes that SEPA review for the drainage work be in the form of an addendum pursuant to WAC 197- 11- 600(4)(c) and 197 -11 -625. Background and Project Description During the October 20, 2003 storm event, the infiltration system described above was overwhelmed. A large amount of surface runoff flowed down the steep slope, causing erosion and deposition of a large quantity of sediment on Macadam Road South. In response to a request by the City of Tukwila Department of Public Works, the District began investigating a solution to the drainage problem that would prevent additional erosion. Alternatives were evaluated and discussed in Conveyance Alternatives Memorandum by R. W. Beck, Inc., in July 2004. The school board selected the recommended alternative which was to replace the infiltration system with a pipe and detention system to convey flow from the Foster High School football field and Showalter Middle School to Macadam Road South roadside ditch. The infiltration system has been in place for several years; however it does not meet current city standards because of its location at the top of a steep slope and because it is undersized for the collection area being served. The purpose of the proposed project is to correct this deficiency, thereby reducing the potential for erosion and slope instability. File: 011247/ 11-00969-100040001 /Tukwila School District— Conveyance Alternatives/ Correspondence 1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2500 Seattle, WA 98154 -1004 Phone(206)695 -4700 Fax (206)695 -4764 etooti-oto • Nora Gierloff and Brandon Miles October 4, 2004 Page 2 6'V. llE CK The proposed layout is shown in the attached design drawings. Runoff from the school and football field would be conveyed from the infiltration system across the baseball field in a pipe to a detention pipe and control structure. Detention will be installed to offset the potential increase in peak flows due to the football field improvements. Outflow would be conveyed down the steep slope through an anchored, high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe that would extend from the top of the slope to the west side of Macadam Road South. The pipe sections will be butt fused together at the top of the bank forming a continuous pipe which is then guided down the steep slope. The HDPE pipe would lie along the top of the ground. At the bottom of the ravine, the pipe would enter a manhole for energy dissipation. Flow would then be directed south in an existing roadside ditch to an existing 24 -inch culvert under Macadam Road South. No Significant Environmental Impacts The drainage project has been designed to avoid all significant environmental impacts. In particular, Installation of underground pipes and manholes construction will be conducted in accordance with the erosion and sediment control plan; disturbed areas will be restored; and trenching down the steep slope will be avoided. The design includes a surface pipeline which is assembled at the top of slope and slid downhill into place. Work on the hillslope will be limited to hand labor activities such as brush cutting and hammering. Use of heavy equipment on the steep slope is specifically prohibited. Upon completion, the proposed project will convey flow down a steep slope in a pipe, reducing groundwater and surface water flows on the slope. The project will return the runoff to the steep slope to a quantity nearer its historical level and will reduce impacts of the prior football field construction. In short, the project will improve, not adversely impact, the environment. We request that you consider the information we have provided and our request that additional work be addressed in a SEPA addendum that supplements the previous SEPA review and DNS. Sincerely, R.W. Beck, Inc. Jack C. Bjork, P.E. JCB /sm File: 011247/ 11-00969-100040001 /Tukwila School District — ConvevanceAlternatives /Correspondence • Sep 29 04 02:58p Pamela 0decard A. BACKGROUND 20G- 433 -7143 p.2 Epic N pic Pile l . - -- - ' F.pic hi No. Fee: Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Foster I-ligh School field Renovations 2. Name of applicant: Tukwila Schoot District 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ADDRESS Contact: Erik Sweet, ASL.A David Evans and Associates, Inc. 3700 Pacific 1 -levy, E, suite 311 Tacoma, WA 98424 tel. 253-922-9780 4. Date checklist prepared: January 15, 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila. RECEIVED OCT 0 4 2004 TUKW ILA PUBLIC WORKS 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that demolition and construction activities will begin in June, and be completed by the end of August 2003. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 3. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. I'as,c. I p&0cfr0W Sep 29 04 02:58p Pamela Odeard ENVIRONMENTAL CI 1 F,CKLIST 206- 433 -7143 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. p.3 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building p.•rniits, demolition permit, clearing and eructing peertrtit, and sewer permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There.are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers or 'leis Inge. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The proposed project would renovate the athletic field and other improvements at Foster High School by: • repltucing the natural turf on the football field with siynthetic her/; • re- surfacing the cinder track with a more modern surface; • re-placing and enlarging facilities for rest rooms, concessions and storage; • replacing stands on the visitor's side of the field; and • replacing and updating the press box in the stadium. As a resuit of these proposed activities, access to the .field and its pc'ilitie•s will be improved for emergency vehicles and disabled persons. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila at 4242 S. 1440 Street, on the campus of Foster High School. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. Page 2 Sep 29'04 02:58p Pamela 0deard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS t Earth 206- 433 -7143 p.4 a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat rolling, frilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? A portion of the edge of the site has a slope of 3:1. c.. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, .:,_nk) ?. If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The existing sand and grovel soils were placed on the site to prepare for development of the existing athletic field. The site does not include prime farmland soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? if so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source offal. The football field will be graded to accommodate the synthetic turf surface. The fill taken from the field mil he used to fill a slope between the field and the parking lot to provide wheek'huir uccr :ss to the site. The approximate amount of fill. to be moved is 5000 yds. f Could erasion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g Due to the flat terrain, it is not likely that erosion would occur. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The site currently contains approximatly 24% impervious_ This percentage will not increase after completion of this project. It will rennin at 24% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if UHF (: nrtlplir7nc'e with city erosion control standards. Paf;c 3 Sep 29 04 02:58p Pamela Odecard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK! JST 2. Air 206 - 433 -7143 p.5 a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust and vehicle exhaust would result from on -site grading activities. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Propos,..;! me..sures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. Water a. Surface: 7) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. Page .1 Sep 29 04 02:59p Pamela 0degard ENVIRONMFNTAI. CHECKLIST 4. Plants U. 206- 433 -7143 p.6 Check or circle type's of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar; pine, other shrubs grass astu re cro or grain _ wet sail plants. cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water Iily, eel grass, mil£oil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? -The natural grass surface on the football field will be removed. Existing landscaping will be altered to accommodate site modifications. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the.site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve ve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Some landscaping will be added to the entryway to the site. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site Birds: Mammals: Fish: Other: songbirds b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c'. Is the site part of u migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Sep 29 04 02:59p Pamela 0degard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST . None proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources 206 - 433 -7143 p.7 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for lights, heating, and c'omntunicolions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,, cnerallry describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List otherproposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The concessions /rest room building will be only partially heated, and will rneef all state requirements fir energy efficiency. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of . this proposal? lf so, describe. Norte known. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Arnbulance/EMT services will occasionally be needed for athletic events. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed. b. Noise T) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Existing noisy in the area will not Vre:l the project. Page 7 Sep 29 04 02:59p Pamela Odecard 206- 433 -7143 p.8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Whhat types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long-term basis (for example: traffic:, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Machinery and equipment noise will be created during construction. Noise from spectators will occur during athletic events. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction activity will be limited to daylight hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What i:he.: ... trrent use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as a sports stadium_ Adjacent uses include a Foster High School, Showalter Middle School the City of Tukwila indoor pool, and St. Thomas Church. Single - family residences are !pealed across S. 144th Street. b. Ilas the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. To our knowledge, the site has not been previously used fir agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site currently includes a stadium and appurtenant facilities for athletic events: rest rooms, storage areas, and concessions. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The rest rooms, storage building, concessions , and press box will be demolished • and replaced. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Single- family residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LOR - Lan' Density Residential, with u public recreation overlay. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A /r. lias any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. I'ogc $ Sep 29'04 02:59p Pamela Odegard 206- 433 -7143 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS'C i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Other than existing Maintenance Staff, no aiL.liliontd employee ;s are anticipated, Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. 1• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None proposed. p.9 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The prq.:.;ed d::se is an expansion of an existing use, and is permitted. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None. b. Approximately how mans/ units, if any, 'voulrl be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing stadium is 36 feet in height. Existing light standards are approximately 30 feet in height. The exterior building materials jinn llre proposed ccracessions /restroom /slorage building are split faced concrete block, with a metal roof intended to match the exterior of the existing stadium. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. e. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Design new structures to he visually compatible with the existing stadium. l'age 11 Sep 29 04 03:OOp Pamela Odegard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11. Light and Glare u. What hype of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day zvould it mainly occur? Existing stadium lights illuminate the athletic field during practice limes and games. These lights will typically be used during evening hours. At the request of the Police Department, security lighting will be added to are area around the rest rooms and concessions. These lights will remain on until dawn. 206- 433 -7143 p.10 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety/ hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed. 12. Recreatioct a. What designed and informal. recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Located on the high school campus are tennis courts and ball fields. The existing truck and field facilities are used informally by the public. Adjacent to the site is the city pool. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Temporary displacement of the recreational use of the track and field will occur during construction. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Schedule construction during summer wontlrs when school is out of session; coordinate construction activities with the school's coaches and athletic director. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation u. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally/ describe. No. 1',ts;t• 10 u, uo:uup ramela uoe ;ara ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CUb-'7OJ- / 1't0 p.11 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any_ None proposed. 14. Traxtsportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the c'yistinrf' street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by S. 144" Street, with access to the site via driveways from Fosier High School and Stu •ttuelter Middle School. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is .se'rv'er/ by Metro route 142, with a bus stop ut the intersection of 5. 144th Street and 42 ", Avenue. c. flow many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Existing parking at Foster 1ligh School has 151 spaces. No spaces mill be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. t• How many vehicular trips per elan/ would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Because llte project invoices improvements to existing Acuities, t,r'a' velticnlar trips mould be limited to any possible new users of the facility. It is likely that peak traffic volumes vc'ould occur during evening hours when practice tine's are scheduled or completed, and games are ::c•Iu'tlulerl. ['ago 11 Sep 29 04 03:OOp Pamela Odegard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 206 - 433 -7143 p.12 Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: ; None proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe It is not expected that there would be an increased need for public services as rr result of this renovation project. b. Propoti. ! me• sures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural ;,as, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary server, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Existing restroom /concessions structure has power, and the new will also keep This r'orurection and be used in i/ie sane' manor as current usage. C=onstruction will use existing power for remodel and construction work. Water: 2" water line currently exists connected to building, replacement building will maintain same 2" connection. Construction will use the existing water connections for construction purposes. Sewer : A 6" PVC sewer line currently exists to the current structure, and this will be reused for the new building. Val Vue sewer has determined a reconnect to the existing line is more than adequate for the mph/cement sfruc•fnre. f-'agt. 12 Sep 29 04 03:OOp Pamela Odegard ENVIRONMF.NTAI. CHECKLIST C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my kn agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 20G- 433 -7143 p.13 edgI un Lrstand that the lead •1♦ Mich; .1 P. lla olio, A1CI' Certif cation #6681 I)atc Submitted: Page 13 Sep 29 04 03:01p Pamela 0decard ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST F. sUPPI,FMENTAI, SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS 206- 433 -7143 p.14 The objectives and the alternative means of helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of provides a general overall perspective of environmental information provided and information, studies, etc. reaching the objectives for a proposal will be the Environmental Checklist. This information the proposed action in the context of the the submitted plans, documents, supportive 1. What are the objectives of the proposal? To improve playing conditions, spectator enjoyment, and access by replacing field surfrxcrs, visitor bleachers, and rest room and concession facilities of Foster J?igh School Stadium. 2. What are th, .itea iative means of accomplishing these objectives? Replacing lire field's playing surface with natural grass would provide a lower initial outlay of cash. There are no other feasible means of improving facility access for disabled persons. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The prefc'rrerl euurse (7.1 action will result ill significantly lower maintenance costs. In addition, the potential for groundwater contamination will be virtually eliminated because the synthetic turf field requir's no application of grater, f'rtilizer, or pesticide. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy t'Ian? The site's Comprehensive Plan designation includes a Public Recreation Overlay that contemplates this List. 5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None proposed. rage .14 City of TukwiSA Screening Checklist Date: City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist 2/3/03 Lt. FEB 0 2003 COr' Lehi i Y DEVELOPil'iENT Applicant Name: Tukwila School D istrict c/o Erik Sweet Street Address: David Evans and Assori atps, Tnr _ 3700 Pacific Highway East, Suite 311 City, State, Zip: Tacana, WA 98424 Telephone: 253 -922 -9780 DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 1 City of Tukwl'SA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES)Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreenlDuwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. tap Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 2 City of TukwillikSA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 1 8- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 ontinue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 January 25, 2001 3 City of Tukwill,SA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 • YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 4 • City of Tukwi SA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 January 25, 2001 5 Part D (continued) City of Tukwill,SA Screening Checklist 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 . 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) January 25, 2001 6 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 u j n FEB 0 5 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELCo`mpany or Customer Name:1 1 KING CO ASSESSOR MCI040 REAL ESTATE INQUIRY BATCH REQUEST SHEET FORMAT = MCI040 -1 I PAGE 01/07 DATA ENTRY: BATCH: ENTERED: VERIFIED: /Z._ R ic is weep I U Attention of: Dig 46 C ✓i4iS 1 CS. Ph: 0263"9.22 - 77e9O 37ao P �_ �� - _ , ac.. ' / /�'t-emmi. "!,'-- ,01)42¢ PLEASE BE PREPARED TO PAY AT THE TIME OF PICK -UP My signature below indicates that I agree to pay the charges associated with this request, that I have read and understand the information on the reverse side of this form, and that I am responsible for the accuracy and acts of omissions or errors of the batch request. )E. Address: cn c Signed: Optional Billing Information: Task: Project #: Project Name: Batch Request #: 10 (,K INQUIRY TYPE (Check one or more types as desired) .Printout of selected tax roll .list information. 0 If this type is chosen, check one of the options below: Tax Information Only. O Name/Address Information Only O Legal Description Information Only O Compete Information (Tax, NIA, Legal) MAILING LABELS 1 Name/Address sticker label per parcel. 2 Name/Address sticker label per parcel. O 3 Name/Address sticker label per parcel. MCI 041 O Legal Description on sticker label. By: (Clerk) //,64,. Authorized: King County Department of Assessments Public Information, Ph: 206 - 296 -7300 Fax: 206 - 296 -5107 Date: / -30 -d.3 DOA Form 40 (Rev. 9/00) 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 2 00 40000197 3 ' 40000198 4029 S 144TH ST 4 40000210 4053 S 144TH ST 5 40000215 6 40000220 7 40000225 8 40000228 14429 42ND AV S 9 40000231 14435 42ND AV S 10 40000234 14445 42ND AV S 11 40000235 4056 S 146TH ST 12 40000240 4044 S 146TH ST 13 40000335 14406 42ND AV S 14 40000336 14412 42ND AV S 15 40000338 14422 42ND AV S 16 40000340 14418 42ND AV S 17 40000341 14414 42ND AV S 18 40000344 4215 S 144TH ST 19 40000345 4223 S 144TH ST 20 40000361 4229 S 144TH ST 21 40000362 4235 S 144TH ST 22 40000365 4237 S 144TH ST 23 40000370 4261 S 144TH ST 24 40000375 25 40000380 4419 S 144TH ST 26 40000383 4433 S 144TH ST 27 40000384 4431 S 144TH ST 28 40000390 4435 S 144TH ST 29 40000392 4439 S 144TH ST 30 :. 40000395 4443 S 144TH ST 31 40000400 4461 S 144TH ST 32 40000401 14421 46TH AV S _ 33 I 40000403 34 v 40000405 14437 46TH AV S 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 35 040000407 14441 46TH AV S 36 40000408 14447 46TH AV S 37 40000416 4444 S 146TH ST 38 40000417 4440 S 146TH ST 39 40000420 4434 S 146TH ST 40 40000425 4424 S 146TH ST 41 40000427 4428 S 146TH ST 42 40000430 4400 S 146TH ST 43 40000441 4244 S 146TH ST 44 40000442 4242 S 146TH ST 45 40000443 4238 S 146TH ST 46 40000455 4234 S 146TH ST 47 40000462 4224 S 146TH ST 48 40000464 4220 S 146TH ST 49 40000470 4222 S 146TH ST 50 40000472 51 40000478 14428 46TH AV S 52 40000482 14414 46TH AV S 53 40000483 14424 46TH AV S 54 40000484 14408 46TH AV S 55 40000485 56 40000490 4617 S 144TH ST 57 40000495 4629 S 144TH ST 58 40000496 4635 S 144TH ST 59 40000500 4641 S 144TH ST 60 40000501 61 - 40000505 4727 S 144TH ST 62 40000510 4803 S 144TH ST 63 40000511 64 40000515 4823 S 144TH ST 65 40000516 4817 S 144TH ST 66 400005'i 7 4827 S 144TH ST 67 v 40000521 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 68 0040000522 4915 S 144TH ST 69 I ' 40000530 4905 S 144TH ST 70 40000539 71 40000560 72 40000566 4806 S 146TH ST 73 40000570 74 40000575 4642 S 146TH ST 75 40000581 4624 S 146TH ST 76 40000585 4620 S 146TH ST 77 40000586 4616 S 146TH ST 78 40000595 14442 46TH AV S 79 dP 40000596 _ 14434 46TH AV S 80 1523049008 14005 42ND AV S 81 1523049013 4060 S 144TH ST 82 1523049027 4529 S 140TH ST 83 1523049035 14011 MACADAM RD S 84 1523049036 14239 MACADAM RD S 85 1523049040 86 1523049041 87 1523049044 14251 MACADAM RD S 88 1523049054 14314 48TH AV S 89 1523049070 90 1523049106 4414 S 144TH ST 91 1523049107 4611 S 140TH ST 93 1523049109 4515 S 140TH ST 94 1523049111 4617 S 140TH ST 95 1523049116 4712 S 144TH ST 96 1523049117 4814 S 144TH ST 97 1523049122 $ abiecrs Dx PAGE 04/07 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 98 1523049123 14120 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL 99 1523049124 4710 S 144TH ST 100 1523049154 101 1523049164 14100 MACADAM RD S 102 1523049172 4407 S 140TH ST 103 1523049180 14233 MACADAM RD S 104 1523049188 14245 MACADAM RD S 105 1523049191 14201 42ND AV S 106 1523049197 4804 S 144TH ST 107 1523049208 14239 42ND AV S 108 1523049209 4704 S 144TH ST 109 1523049210.14120 1523049212 44TH AV S 110 111 1523049240 14328 48TH AV S 112 1523049242 14212 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL 113 1523049247 4716 S 144TH ST 114 1523049251 115 1523049269 116 1523049270 14303 48TH AV S 117 1523049271 118 1523049279 14203 42ND AVE S 119 1523049289 14313 48TH AVE S 120 1523049290 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 121 1554200005 14247 41ST AVE S 122 1554200010 14241 41ST AVE S 123 1554200015 -124 1554200020 125 1554200025 14223 41ST AVE S 126 1554200030 14226 PACIFIC HWY S 127 1554200033 14232 41ST AVE S 128 1554200034 129 1554200035 130 1554200036 14220 41ST AVE S 131 1554200037 14228 41ST AVE S 132 1610000335 14110 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL 133 1610000355 76011110:00001 . 7348200015 14110 PACIFIC HW S 14225 42ND AV S 14014 42ND AV S 134 135 136. 7348200020 14020 42ND AV S 137 7348200025 14100 42ND AV S 138 7348200030 14104 42ND AVE S 139 7348200035 14110 42ND AV S 140 7348200045 14116 42ND AV S 141 7348200050 4210 S 142ND ST 142 7348200055 4218 S 142ND ST PAGE 06/07 01/30/2003 11:11 2062965107 KING CO ASSESSOR 143 7348200060 14115 43RD AV S 144 7348200065 14109 43RD AV S 145 7348200070 14103 43RD AVE S 146 7348200075 14031 43RD AVE S 147 7348200080 14025 43RD AV S 148 7348200085 14021 43RD AV S 149 7348200090 14015 43RD AV S 150 7348200115 14014 43RD AV S 151 7348200120 14020 43RD AV S 152 7348200125 14026 43RD AV S 153 7348200130 14032 43RD AV S 154 7348200134 14046 43RD AVE S 155 7348200135 14116 43RD AV S 156 7348200150 14122 43RD AV S 157 7348200155 14125 44TH AV S 158 7348200160 14121 44TH AV S 159 7348200165 14117 44TH AV S 160 7348200170 14111 44TH AV S 161 7348200175 14105 44TH AV S 162 7348200180 14027 44TH AV S 163 7348200185 14025 44TH AV S 164 7348200195 4321 S 140TH ST 165 7348200200 4325 S 140TH ST PAGE 07/07 • • • PROGRAM N ATR043 REAL PROPERTY INQUIRY BATCH SUMMARY REPORT 02/01/03 JOB: MCI040 BATCH CUSTOMER NUMBER NAME 0X DAVID EVANS & ASO OY WALTERS &ASSOC LLC OZ JERRY A SANTOS COMMENTS NAME LEGAL CUSTOMER SEG /MERGE LABELS LABELS INQUIRIES INQUIRIES 162 0 0 0 81 O O .to., 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 258 O 0 O • • • JOB N ATR040 R E A L P R O P E R T Y I N Q U I R Y E X T R A C T E R R O R R E P O R T 02/01/03 PAGE BATCH NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER CUSTOMER NUMBER ERROR MESSAGE OX 004000- 0539 -02 PARCEL ON KILL STATUS OX 004000-0539-02 80R9 SPLIT CODE MISSING OX 004000- 0560 -04 PARCEL ON KILL STATUS OX 004000-0560 -04 80R9 SPLIT CODE MISSING Map Output Aar) �� c. Mtn P King County Home News \116-1t41-11 KAr Services Comments Search Page 1 of 1 REC l/ LZ FEB 0 5 2003 iMAP Print Pa • e D itlflgrP =I ,s IS IMF S- 137:1TH ST 9047 ►rii0i 9015' 1 S 139TH ST t: S 1-39TH-ST 9080 0 S-1413T ST 9263 S- 140TH.ST 0012 0011 z ' 139TH-ST 0037 Mig Jai �a 2 5.1418T -ST 0335 16 ' 1 8 742ND: 0225 S-142N0 :ST 0076 MIN r gar 1 0715 `r 148TH :ST ',jaw ICINGCOUNTY t 0170 0093 he information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. 1 ing County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on his ma. is .rohibited exce.t b written .ermission of Kin. Coun . King County 1 GIS Center 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. ru 15 1.10).1(7(1 tl?tot4AL �a /orgy ,r (A) fvt6Z -C tbd_- 7-6•51DEMAt_- Ft t'loilAtt aorq S'G\Kt(-__ ® lea s� go3-coG VELOPi47ENIT http: / /www5.metrokc.gov /servlet/com. esri. esrimap. Esrimap? ServiceName= overview &ClientV ersion =3. 2/3/03 � I 0 NI0 LEGEND DEMOLITION LEGEND • • DEMOLITION KEY NOTES O, spy ZA300w0 R001510.' KKR ...REMO.E RAE.F.OL1fw00.5005001 f .41.m00NG.If CURB Eh" 500 xt V ROARK f...5 1•4 C.O. RR. vE w0aa0IEG1fF4IN0 toff MIR +w +r DR+SS+R WvO E+SE f0 • E g10u5 FRCP IRwH rl [S IOR r... CnwV RNCE Owwf CO.U1R4CrpHFFNCE wIERw. L ' J 0 3 . 30 1 0 1) 3 0 1 30 0 .r0 GATES /1 w IRKIOa10w OlIg..1ERFYaC10 CONTRA J wCES.w ^ R1NK.F SIR... f30v WK. (/D� REMOVE E.41w03. E+C�I RSFROM VISITORS SOE. 'D REMOVEw0O4005E0.GOAL ROSIS (� 0EM0f4N w0 REMOVE E.41.0 wnwm O u FRIMI a0 SE IEN L If FN: F 100EM0.6i0 Fue RfMKEO 001.0.11 .41w000RS MOM REMORE ENE CU. RR. RROLONDR CDRS,RM(Id.0=55 NCwO�F 1InE NmroSlSl :GEEU M. R..100. 6INK. REPLACED •(vOO CW1RC1OR Of.RR.1N)1. w.iCS! DEMOLITION NOTES 10 U�OEwW 6rtC 0 0 0=F �0 S dg co .ct r I l ' f- aa) ' L ' �I 0) 3°- a c c) 0 J cr •o w ai_ a Q co Q i CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS REVISIONS: 0300: 330CN 10. 0003 DESIGN: ( (20 DRs•5: 000[300: REVISION NUMBER. SCALL: 1' - 30' PROJECT HOMIER: TUKW000I SMELT N0. L1.1 X03_ .!4 () �; :�Isfi. :. : ()I I Vi 1 ;I:1 .... ::I tSEI R.t• stl N ,fat KEE SS NEW CCrINP EO•r. PROJECT COMPONENTS 1. NEW CONCESSIONS / RESTROOM/STORAGE BUILDING 20002200 SO FT 1 (SEE NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION) 2. NEW SYNTHETIC TURF RUBBER SURFACING POROUS ASPHALT BASE UNDER DRAINAGE PERIMETER DRAINAGE 3. ENTRY PLAZA SPACE •' CONTROL SECURITY ADA ACCESS TO STADIUM/FIELD AND ALL COMPONENTS PERMEABLE PAVERS ACCENT PAVING / CONCRETE FIRE ACCESS NEW LANDSCAPING BENCH SEATING REVISIONS: SCALE: 1' - b' PROJECT NRRREE. TUKWDD01 SEPA SITE PLAN 2:02:12 PM, ej 0- er • AIM XZP Yir -4I CONCESSION STAND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: UV • 1'4' 0 (D) IECO STORAGE 54r, ritial G 9- 9- CONCESSION STAND SECTION O SCALE: it 9- ,O. NH wren 1:4 GAWP u.I M1RE LPL NI 0 25 5 7510 25CD 0 4+Nuallt S. n.w..rt■rL. 7.1 CONCESSION STAND SECTION SCALE: 11e • 1'P rtv P.Ottit 4114 eal, ATIECO I.QY 51NLrl ••q NM) 5n•.aeOWNS wE1.[ro•aL.1. Lw. • - IN GOWER 0 25 5 75 10 125 0 25 5 7.5 10 525 � • CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARC NN >< WV 90 05 0l ELVISIONS: DATE: eLeAVA9 -19. CHOP DESIGN: 5vl CHECKED. REVLSION 14011D131: !CALF: I/O • I'_p PROJECT NUNB@: TUKW000I SHUT NO. or A2.1 3 5_ Y) 1- N 0) 0 0 c co n • 01 D CT W W 0 Ct Pc 1— -0 .9- E a: 0 0 ENLARGED PLAN SCALE:1M. • 1..0. 0 ,r5 25 5 71 70 ENLARGED ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4. • 1.47. L-7 ENLARGED SECTION SCALE-1W • r-0. ENLARGED .AR.G4TED ELEVATION . 0 25 5 75 10 121 (I) O 25 5 75 10 125 (I) O 25 5 75 10 125 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS • C PACKtigC111 REN1510e1s: DATE: (101...11, 2003 504. IMMIX: 5NC IllY131011 MINIUM SCALE. I/ 4. • 10-0. PROJECT HUMBER: TUKW0001 SUR MO. 01 A3.3