Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E03-020 - HUDAK TRENT / BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE (BNSF) - PLANNED ACTION FOR BUILDINGBNSF MAINTENANCE BLDG 12200 51 PL S E03 -020 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 14, 2003 NOTICE OF DECISION To: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad, Applicant Jim Morgan, Project Engineer King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter serves a notice of decision that the application to designate the railroad yard improvements for Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad as a planned action is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: E0 -020 SEPA Planned Action APPLICANT: Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad REQUEST: SEPA Planned Action Approval for Railroad Yard Improvements LOCATION: 12200 51st Avenue South PROJECT DESCRIPTION: BNSF will construct a 60'X 60' building which will be used for wash facilities and as a diesel fueling station. During construction approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be disturbed. A utility line will be constructed through two wetland buffers. The applicants will be required to restore the buffer to its pre - project condition. DETERMINATION: Project is designated as a planned action. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H) Notice of Decision — Planned Action Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Page 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 • • Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Brandon J. Miles who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3670 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster City of Tukwila DCD Director SEPA Responsible Official Page 2 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: No ice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Name: y Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice ? i- Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Project Number: ED " Q Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: ZeLl Official Notice ‘15/(1- Short Subdivision Agenda Person requesting mailing: Notice of Application / Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other , u 0 / 62 f t jc /S /(y1 d �Hi Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this /6- day of in the year 206,3 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: y �-y ? i- 2-i ya�� = �.c -�/1 D� Project Number: ED " Q Mailer's Signature: ZeLl 2 ‘15/(1- f Person requesting mailing: / P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHEILT: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PE. MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC �() K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY () QWEST () SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ()PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE () PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( )CITYOFSEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE () MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIV EWORMS \CHKLIST.DOC () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CLTUKWILA.WA.US.WWW • Ciz of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 10, 2003 Jim Morgan, Project Engineer BNSF 2454 Occidental Ave S., Suite 1 -A Seattle, WA 98134 RE: SEPA Application (E03 -020) Update Dear Mr. Morgan: The proposed plan shows a utility line that will transverse through the wetland buffer of the Type II wetland near the proposed wash facility. In order to locate the utility line in the wetland buffer it will be necessary to obtain Special Permission from the Director to have the buffer reduced to 15 feet. The need to submit an application for the wetland reduction was noted at the lire- application meeting. To qualify for a wetland buffer reduction it must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director that it will not result in direct or indirect, short term or long term adverse impacts to wetlands and that: 1. The buffer is vegetated and includes an enhancement plan as may be required to improve the buffer function and value; or 2. If there is no significant vegetation in the buffer, a buffer may be reduced only if an enhancement plan is provided. The plan must include using a variety of native vegetation that improves the functional attributes of the buffer and provides additional protection for the wetland or watercourse function and values. If BNSF does not wish to submit for wetland reduction, the underground utility line must be moved outside of the wetland buffer. Enclosed you will find the application material for wetland reduction. If you have any questio you can call (206) 431 -3684 or by email at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Si y, don J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. File (E03 -020) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Cizy of f Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Brandon Miles Date: October 10, 2003 Re: MEMORANDUM E03 -020 (SEPA Determination Planned Action) BNSF Tukwila Inter -modal Yard Improvements 12200 51st PL S Project Description: The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has submitted an application for a SEPA planned action for improvements to the Tukwila Intermodal Yard. BNSF will construct a 60'X 60' building which will be used for wash facilities and as a diesel fueling station. During construction approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be disturbed. The project will also require that a new water flow line be installed which will extend about a mile to a utility connection at S. 116th Street. This water line will require work within 25 feet of two wetlands. This is a Planned Action SEPA which removes the City's notice of application requirements. In order for the project to considered under a SEPA planned action the following criteria apply: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and/or accessory use located with the MIC /L or MIC/H zones? The property is currently zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). Railroad lines are a permitted use with the MIC/H zoning. In addition gas pumps and heavy equipment repair are permitted in the zone. 2. Will all impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Near the location of the wash facility and fuel pumps is a Type III wetland. A Type III wetland requires a 25 foot buffer and 15 foot setback from the buffer. The applicant has requested to have the setback reduced 10 feet. This is not unreasonable considering that the setback area is already developed. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Ra lad E03 -020, Planned Action SEPA Staff Report Some utility lines transverse through the wetland buffer. TMC 18.45 sets requirements for locating utilities within the wetland buffer: a. Essential utilities must be constructed to minimize or, where possible, avoid wetland disturbance. b. All construction must be designed to protect the wetland and its buffer against erosion, uncontrolled drainage, restriction of groundwater movement, slides, pollution, habitat disturbance, any loss of flood carrying and storage capacity, and excavation or fill detrimental to the environment. c. Upon completion of installation of essential utilities, wetlands must be restored to pre - project configuration, replanted as required and provided with maintenance care until newly planted vegetation is established. 3. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? The existing hub serves as a major connection for interstate trade. The proposed development will allow the rail yard to operate more efficiently. The project is consistent with the following goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan: Goal 11.1, Support for existing industrial activities in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center and development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits of the people of Tukwila and the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. As noted the proposed expansion will allow the existing rail yard to operate more efficiently. Section 11.1.5, Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity. Rail transportation is very important to all manufacturing uses in the City and the region. By enhancing the yard's capabilities all uses in the MIC district will benefit. 4. The project is not one of the following: a. an essential public facility; b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvements or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold determination; or d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark. Recommendation The proposal meets all SEPA Planned Action requirements and thus is not required to go through the full SEPA review. The only environmental impact is the construction of the underground water line through the wetland buffer. This can be mitigated through the City's existing wetland regulations (TMC 18.45). 2 • City of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor August 1, 2003 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Mr. Trent Hudak, Manager BNSF 2454 Occidental Ave S. Suite 1 -A Seattle, WA 98134 Re: Notice of complete application; SEPA Planned Action (E03 -020) Dear Mr. Hudak: The Department of Community Development received your SEPA Planned Action application on July 16, 2003 for improving and updating an existing railroad equipment maintenance yard, including the construction of one building. Based on a review of your application for submittal requirements for SEPA Planned Action your application is deemed complete as of August 1, 2003. As this project is part of a SEPA planned action there is no public notice requirements. The application has been routed to City Departments for review and comments. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, you can contact me at (206) 431 -3670 or by email at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. File (L03 -020) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Update and Clarification InterMountain Resources For Environmental Impacts and Permit Trippers Related to the BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Railroad Yard Improvements Comprehensive Environmental Services DATE: 5 June 2003 LOCATION: Located in a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 3, T23N, R4E, King County, Washington; N 47 °30' by W 122 °17' FOR: The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) Attn: Mr. Jim Morgan, Project Engineer 2454 Occidental Avenue South, Suite 1-A Seattle, WA 98134 -1451 BY: Jim, Pierre Bordenave Registered Professional Soil Scientist (NSCSS) # 054 Certified Professional Soil Scientist (ARCPACS) #02715 InterMountain Resources As a result of some discussions and questions in your meeting with the City of Tukwila (City), as to the extent of the wetlands shown on our maps in the "InterMountain Resources Initial Site Evaluation for Wetland Jurisdictional Determination, dated March 31, 2003," I am providing the following clarifications. Apparently, the City maps identify a more extensive area of wetlands within the Utility right -of- way (ROW), a portion of which is shown on the south end of our submitted maps. This came up in my initial meeting with the City and it was my understanding that the City maps have not been "ground - truthed" in that area. Update & Clarification for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement 5 June 2003 Page 1 of 2 .03 Ca0 RECLINED °JUL 18 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT gym• asp - Al MI ,. 120 E. Lake Street, Suite 301 • P.O. Box 1724 • Sandpoint, ID 83864 • (208) 263 -9391 • (208) 263 -7013 Fax NI : rd Ws MINN III 1I•i I was also not able to precisely identify the exact size of the wetlands at the west end of the map due to the fact that I could not flag, stake, or dig around in that area because it is not BNSF property. However, I was able to walk the entire perimeter of the Utility ROW that runs from the Tukwila Yard to Interurban Ave / E. Marginal Way. As a result, I am very comfortable with the relative location of the extent of the emergent wetlands at the eastern end of the Utility ROW. At the location of my identified wetland boundary, there is a very defined topographic rise from that point to the road. There was no indication of any direct, or indirect, connection to the Duwamish River or any associated tributary drainage's. This was the basis for my conclusion of the isolated nature of the wetlands. I have attached some additional photographs I took of the area to better identify the limits of the wetlands. If the City feels it is necessary, I would be happy to walk them through the area, or if they wish, the Utility ROW that is easily accessed from the west end by the road, all the way to the BNSF railyard boundary. Let me know if there is any other information that will help in this matter. • Pierre Bordenave InterMountain Resources Photo Attachments Update & Clarification for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement 5 June 2003 Page 2 of 2 AMUU Mn AIM emi -1 - s View of utility line corridor from the BNSF railyard. Area identified in IMR wetland delineation as "emergent wetland" in utility corridor. PHOTO DOCUMENTATION BNSF: Tukwila Intermodal Yard Facilities Improvements King County, WA; 6/2003 Attachment to IMR 6/5/2003 Update & Clarification Report View towards BNSF railyard from midpoint between Interurban Avenue and the railyard. PHOTO DOCUMENTATION BNSF: Tukwila Intermodal Yard Facilities Improvements King County, WA; 6/2003 Attachment to IMR 6/5/2003 Update & Clarification Report C) Initial Site Evaluation InterMountain Resources Comprehensive Environmental Services For Wetland Jurisdictional Determination DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT: FOR: BY: 31 March 2003 Located in a portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 3, T23N, R4E, King County, Washington; N 47 °30' by W 122 °17' Existing Intermodal Railroad Yard Facilities Upgrade The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) Attn: Mr. Jim Morgan, Project Engineer 2454 Occidental Avenue South, Suite 1 -A Seattle, WA 98134 -1451 Pierre Bordenave Registered Professional Soil Scientist (NSCSS) # 054 InterMountain Resources Background and Summary InterMountain Resources (IMR) was requested by BNSF to conduct an environmental evaluation and wetlands delineation to avoid potential impacts from the construction of a maintenance building at the north end of what is known as the Tukwila Yard. The intent of this evaluation was to identify the presence of jurisdictional wetlands or other natural environmental issues within the property that may impact, or be impacted by, the proposed activity and identify project impact limits to ensure compliance with federal, state, and municipal regulations. Initial Site Evaluation for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement - Tukwila, WA 31 March 2003 Page 1 of 4 RECEIVED 'BLI16213 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EDP -©LCD 120 E. Lake Street, Suite 301 • P.O. Box 1724 • Sandpoint, ID 83864 • (208) 263 -9391 • (208) 263 -7013 Fax 4_•_ mow' 41=11 E' ' Ammo - : M 1 -•iw.11111 Methodoloav 1. Reviewed the National Wetlands Inventory Map 7.5 Quad Map "Seattle South, Washington" 1987. No wetlands are identified within 300 feet of the proposed building area. 2. Reviewed the Natural Resource Conservation Service's "Soil Survey of King County Area, Washington" dated 1973, which doesn't actually cover the project area, but allows for interpolation of soils to expect within the project area. 3. Performed on -site evaluations (2/14/03; 3/26/03) of the property. The wetland evaluation was conducted following routine wetland determination guidelines and methods, to identify and delineate jurisdictional wetlands for purposes of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, as identified in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Formal data plots were completed to identify the wetland boundaries in the vicinity of the proposed building. Soil probes were used to define the perimeter of the wetlands away from the immediate area of the proposed building. We performed project perimeter surveys of the existing conditions of the property and photodocumented the site. Our primary focus was to identify water or wetland features that may restrict the proposed building construction, and potential impacts that the construction of a building may have on the surrounding environment. Site Evaluation Details Overall site topography of the BNSF property is flat, except within the footprint of a portion of the proposed building. Based on my site specific soils evaluation, the rail yard falls within the "Ur Series" (Urban Land). This is described in the King County Soil Survey as "soil which has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers through the additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations." This soil series is a common occurrence in the Duwamish River / Green River Valley Area, with the fill ranging from 3 to over 12 feet thick and consisting of gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam. Initial Site Evaluation for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement - Tukwila, WA 31 March 2003 Page 2 of 4 _u •n ��Fs — alIMUIWEIIIMI Surrounding soils appear to consist of Newberg silt loam, which is consistent with the site soil probe samples we observed on -site. In the location of the proposed building, there is also an area of rock outcrop. There is a perimeter wetland ditch along the west edge of the property. There are no discharge structures or pipes connecting this wetland to the rail yard or any waterway. By definition, this is an isolated wetland, which does not fall within federal agency jurisdiction. It does, however, fall under state and local jurisdiction. During the winter, the seasonal water trapped in this perimeter depressional wetland results in a connection to the adjacent emergent reed canarygrass wetland, within the utility right -of -way perpendicular to the rail yard. This canarygrass meadow wetland has no connection to any pipe or conveyance to any open waterway. It dissipates to infiltration seeps adjacent to the law enforcement practice shooting range. The entire area upon which the building and features are being proposed, is presently developed and used as storage, open maintenance lay -down area, and parking, and is either existing structural fill (over 30 years old), or rock outcrop. The entire area is served by an existing storm water system within the BNSF yard. Conclusion and Recommendations By following erosion, sediment, and storm water protection best management practices (BMP's), the development of the proposed maintenance building will have no impact to any existing water resources in the project area. All runoff from the proposed building and site improvements will grade to the existing rail yard storm water system. No additional runoff beyond the existing natural area of drainage will be directed to the adjacent wetland. The adjacent isolated wetland is non jurisdictional on the federal level; not "Waters of the U.S." There will be no fill or disturbance impacts to this wetland area. The activity proposed would not result in any removal of vegetation or grading or clearing in areas not already used for rail yard maintenance activities. The City of Tukwila Municipal Code (Code) 18.45.020, provides guidelines for the sensitive area designations, and restrictions related to these areas. Based on the description of Wetlands in Section C of the Code, the wetland adjacent to the yard is classified as: "Type 3 - Less than an acre in size and consists of two or fewer Initial Site Evaluation for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement - Tukwila, WA 31 March 2003 Page 3 of 4 _...n - VIII s -- - - 1 IN - - 1 W -• . wetland classes. " It's location between a highly active rail yard and the King County Sheriff Firearms Practice Range does not lend itself to any potential that the area would be used by listed threatened or endangered bird or animal species. There is no connection to any surface waters. Plant species present are dominated by non - native Himalayan Blackberry and Reed canarygrass, with an overstory of cottonwood and vine maple. The buffer setback, Code requirement for Type 3 wetlands is 25 feet. There is no proposed fill or disturbances of any existing wetlands or vegetation surrounding the wetlands. The building will be approximately 30 feet from the closest point of the wetland area. Municipal code requires that the building foundation edge be an additional 15 feet from the edge of the 25 -foot buffer. For safety of equipment exiting the building and not coming into danger near the existing tracks, this total of 40 feet cannot be achieved. However, given the fact that the existing, and continued, non - vegetated yard and vehicle / equipment storage areas already falls within this setback, it appears this setback from a buffer that does not exist and a wetland which will not be altered, is redundant. The BNSF is requesting this additional setback requirement be waived due to the fact the proposed activity is equivalent to an existing similar use and activity for several decades, predating most federal jurisdictions and all state and local jurisdictions. This report and attached maps are provided to the City of Tukwila to obtain a determination of jurisdiction, or concurrence that the proposed building is located outside of sensitive area regulatory restricted area. Pierre Bordenave Registered Professional Soil Scientist (NSCSS) # 054 InterMountain Resources Initial Site Evaluation for Environmental Impacts and Permit Triggers RE: Existing Railroad Intermodal Yard Improvement - Tukwila, WA 31 March 2003 Page 4 of 4 Pierre Sc r t'i nave a W34 . MGM _n .∎ INI AI .M . 1 W III IN El aaMDP' IC Area i1OWV fo AC PSSR ,. ,.. 22 PEM" B MY NOT TO SCALE PROJECT VICINITY • BASE MAP FROM: NWI 7.5 QUAD "SEATTLE SOUTH" DATED 1987 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY r.22 c. InterMountain Resources ".1 " 13 "";_`. P.O. Box 1724, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 .C7721 +7;3 �7 ' Phone 208 - 263 -9391 Fax 208 - 263 -7013 USACE REF. NO.: PROJECT: TUKWILA INTERMODAL YARD MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS APPLICANT: THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. WATERWAY: ISOLATED WETLANDS LEGAL: IN PORTION OF SW 1/4 SEC. 3, T23N, R4E, W.M. COUNTY: KING STATE: WASHINGTON LAT /LONG: APPROX. N47 °30': W122 °17' DATE: MARCH 2003 1) Starting at 1 -5 Exit 156 to Interurban Ave S 2) Head North on Interurban Ave S to 42nd Ave S 3) Continue North on 42nd Ave S to S 124th St 4) Drive to end of S 124th to BNSF Yard Entrance. Entry authorization required. NOT TO SCALE DRIVING DIRECTIONS InterMountain Resources •• • P.O. Box 1724, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 ' a r' r. ° ` - Phone 208 - 263 -9391 Fax 208 - 263 -7013 USACE REF. NO.: PROJECT: TUKWILA INTERMODAL YARD MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS APPLICANT: THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. WATERWAY: ISOLATED WETLANDS LEGAL: IN PORTION OF SW 1/4 SEC. 3, T23N, R4E, W.M. COUNTY: KING STATE: WASHINGTON LAT /LONG: APPROX. N47 °30': W122 °17' DATE: MARCH 2003 MN UM - i - - N ! - - - - ' M MEI 1. View SE of proposed building location and wetlands (Taken 1 23 03) 3. View Northwest across site (Taken 2 14 03) 4. View of wetlands looking Southerly (Taken 2 14 03) PHOTO DOCUMENTATION - BNSF: Tukwila Intermodal Yard Facilities Improvements King County, WA; 3/2003 • 7. Identification of Data Plots (Taken 2 14 03) 8. Stakes Identifying 50 foot Limits from Wetland (Taken 2 14 03) PHOTO DOCUMENTATION - BNSF: Tukwila Intermodal Yard Facilities Improvements King County, WA; 3/2003 —s 0_ D_ 0 D_ 0 >- (11 G✓ wco Q co Qs 0 4 U \ a / a / Z Q /; / c:L ° w /,./ S / 77.- c4/ w W Q O QC_ 7/ 0O1- 0 \ W U S ✓ \ .„7"- ,7-7 Z CC:),_ C \I \\ e) .-'''' U D_ ° % 7 j / Y Z J i W w \ CL Z W w (w C` ' ° 0 t / �0] SO w D' 0 w D_ �w Z w Qwz 0 s ®I \ ,N m N NN 18 N61tt / 1 ABTA PLOT LEGEND PHOTO DOCUMENTATION SITE EXISTING CONDITIONS -- InterMountain Resources P.O. Box 1724, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 Q Phone 208 - 263 -9391 Fax 208 - 263 -7013 PROJECT: TUKWILA INTERMODAL YARD FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS APPLICANT: THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. WATERWAY: ISOLATED WETLANDS LEGAL: IN PORTION OF SW 1/4 SEC. 3, T23N, R4E, W.M. COUNTY: KING STATE: WASHINGTON LAT/LONG: APPROX. N47 °30': W12217' DATE: MARCH 2003 \ \ A PL9 7/ PSSIC : Palustrine, scrub - shrub, broad leaved deciduous, seasonally flooded SCALE: 1"=60' PEM1C: Palustrine, emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded WETLANDS INFORMATION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS U ° InterMountain Resources P.O. Box 1724, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 Phone 208- 263 -9391 Fax 208 - 263 -7013 �.� i o ca l— �L't3CL�D PROJECT: TUKWILA INTERMODAL YARD FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS APPLICANT: THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. WATERWAY: ISOLATED WETLANDS LEGAL: IN PORTION OF SW 1/4 SEC. 3, T23N, R4E, W.M. COUNTY: KING STATE: WASHINGTON LAT/LONG: APPROX. N47 °30': W122 °17' DATE: MARCH 2003 RECEIVED Ls_ a a 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT InterMountainResources Fax:208- 263 -7013 Jul 15 '03 10:50 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us • P. 02 • 1,1r, Viii SEPA PLANNED ACTION API'LI(.',VFION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 105 ad a/ Y a rd w,n vre,,,i 5 ■ 13 N 5 r hr (v, 4AA 0,1,1 f',.J tip a,-• a Pie/ fe1 2D 60 P'- 'S LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. ,GIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. NUM BERS. 11 rec ovI S �o ts. neftnr6 � z 4t ' - 5 . ) Co ak,,12., Jib -►. 0, 97;14 Al2 S _ -k 17(4 `l`' • 5 Quarter. _SLA) Section: 3 Township' Z3 N Range: z15w d . (This. information may be found on your tax statement.) N( lb it: C}1100)l7O RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Vect,,ce, 5 - 17fz.E 03-60g �(�E O3 -0i3 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: F PACT Planner: File Number: E03 -- O 2.0 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Numbers NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 105 ad a/ Y a rd w,n vre,,,i 5 ■ 13 N 5 r hr (v, 4AA 0,1,1 f',.J tip a,-• a Pie/ fe1 2D 60 P'- 'S LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. ,GIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. NUM BERS. 11 rec ovI S �o ts. neftnr6 � z 4t ' - 5 . ) Co ak,,12., Jib -►. 0, 97;14 Al2 S _ -k 17(4 `l`' • 5 Quarter. _SLA) Section: 3 Township' Z3 N Range: z15w d . (This. information may be found on your tax statement.) N( lb it: C}1100)l7O RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Vect,,ce, 5 - 17fz.E 03-60g �(�E O3 -0i3 . 'JUL. 15. 2003." 1; 58Pi, "' a42 3435 KENNEDY /JENKS -J�wY N0. 5542 P. 2hooz inResour Fax:208�263 -7013 Jul • '03 10:51 P.03 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority ca behalf of the applicant in nstetings with City staff, • has full responsibility fbr identifying and satisfying all relevant and acs ovcrlappit g development standards, and • is the painsi contact wjth t City, to whom all notices imd molts wW be scat Name: ,�5 F Address: .Z ft Cr �� Ave., S . 5 , 4.41". L -' } 540e_ 4 Li 9813(/ AX :, 2(X 5 — G115 S Phone: signaue; Dam: V65/6-3. (1re&-" M . EI u dmE , M r. €nn,;- -B)1350 Eoo2o RECEIVED commuNITY DEVELOPMENT InterMountainResources Fax :208- 263 -7013 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: • Jul 15 '03 10:52 P.04 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Consinunlot Development 6300 Sauthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan ©ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS vud+- LJc�1e; '1 P1yRMLSSSION 10 ENTER PROPERTY /14- eU. �, pa 3.5; 6•1_, accc,55 par 'rn1 be.., a��a,I k. Per s 1 abed-19-ft? `a 5; 42-- 1. I am the coned owner of the property which is the subject of this application. r%i • 0 T - �v , ct is 2. All,tatet contained in the applications have boon prepared by me or my agen • < am h and seated to the best of my IuawIci c. I/ tl 104 nata Me 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. , 1. Owe grants the City, its employees, agents, eagineers, contractors a vt • mpresesdatives the right to enter upon Owner's real ptp sty f t7 �P� I located at 2S3 -99z 'NIL) `i for the purpose of application review, tie the limited time necessary to • • ..lete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage • persons or property aouttring on the private property during the City's easy upon the pwopaty unless the lust in. ;hump is the result the sale negligtatce of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion . t ine i the application wi refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific sequeats for items nn the 'Complete Application Chrtdrllst" within nety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information rvyue►1 ninety (90) or mum drys, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without:Pord of fees EXECUTED at On this day foregoing therein. (ci . , _- (state), oa • 20 (Ptiut Name) (Address) (Myrna Monks) (Sigtmhue) y appeared before me to me known to be the individual who escened the and acknowledged that kale signed the mac as kjaala voluntary act and dccd fur the mss and purposes mentioned SUBSC +ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE MBONTHIS DAY OF ,20 NOTARY PUBLIC in ad fix the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JUL, 15. 2003 1:59PM BNSF • July 14, 2003 TRr,,NT M. HUDAK, PE. Manager Engineering N0, 5542 P. • Burlington Northern Santa Pe Engineering Scivicca 2454 Occidental Avenue South, Suite JA Suntk, Waahington 781344451 (206) 6x.6150 (206) 625 -6115 (Fax) tent HudakGDBNSP coal Carol Lumb. Senior Planner City of Tukwila - Planning Division Department of Community Development, Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Access to BNSF - Puget Sound Hub Center, lntermodal Yard BNSF - Tukwila K/J 026127.02 Dear Ms. Lumb: 4 The purpose of this letter is to explain the procedure for visiting the project location per the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) requirements. The SEPA "short form" includes a document titled "AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS, PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY", Due to FRA regulations and BNSF requirements BNSF cannot submit the form listed above. Both the FRA regulations and BNSF's requirements are in place to protect any individual that may be onsite or near an active rail line. Additionally this yard is an intermodal yard which Is inherently dangerous to people unfamiliar with operations. The City of Tukwila personnel will be granted access to the site when desired but will have to coordinate with BNSF personnel and will need to be escorted by a BNSF personnel or an authorized representative of BNSF. An escort is mandatory as city personnel do not have the appropriate orientation and safety training. When access to the site is desired please contact Kevin Cash, BNSF, at (206)658 -1612. Upon arriving at the site always stop at the office to sign in and to meet your designated escort. While onsite you must keep your headlights on and wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Proper PPE for someone performing non - intrusive inspections (i.e. not performing work) includes a hard hat with reflective tape on 4 sides, safety glasses, steel toed boots and a reflective orange vest. If you do not have any or all of the above PPE your BNSF escort may be able to supply them (e.g. protective toe covers instead of steel toed boots), please give them advanced notice of this need. Very truly yours, "a: 0/4 t - Trent M. Hudak Manager Engineering Enclosure cc: H. Jim Morgan (BNSF) File: S Seattle Mtce Building - Permits eN6FlMAet RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT )j03-ozO InterMountainResources Fax • Jul 15 '03 10:53 P.05 • To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and/or accessory use located within the MILL (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. ye c; 20114, 1S iliac) lndAASiY1 -pcarjec�- k 001 of. ✓.eV t "ice an P,Ki S'�7rlS. nail Mad ti a rr . 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please documcnt all mitigation easures, using attachments if necessary. Man P S) L ons-xtca cw S'i' /"I a n u s `2,--i- (,+ . 'W .+:n,; )'e arms no De) ik 5�r�be. Wtsk. rnalvi 3. Is the proposal .consr tent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? yrs -tae -r 11. l "51.4 'ei�cisli n.� m•elt s1`r;eJ a.4 u;iies oy,cj (! j U. (. I P a r t ld.w41.1.1 - 0/rOncinc2 Q.Xisii� la ctr►^� ' ra.� f4 nK. 1 d 4 S (r 0.f ce t1- Clu ss i f.; c 4•s Goa.is d C , P. 4. Is the proposal any of the following: a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70200 or TMC 18.06.270; 'gyp b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; MCA c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold determination; or d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? (Nb If the answer to any of questions a through d is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the planned action process. Eo3 cR__O RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ed (p6p) InterMounta1nResources Fax • Jul 15 '03 10:54 P.06 • (TIN 01. 1st 1:w1 ii..‘ END .%.\(;I:RI:1)'I'I•:(. 11:1 .�( I ti(•RI:I: \I \(; ('II1:( 1.1 .1 Date: I 1 /tA-1 :1 -.. ZCI°3 Applicant Name: n r`i & ' lam`' `"i,j Street Address: %ci (i c dQ1 five, 5. ) -k /-4 City, State, Zip: Sea -t e. �) 4 q8/5471 Telephone: ZoLP — i.P �5 — C41'4 Z (V' 0.1 /4"5(4‘ PrDkjec -- Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle. "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Eo3O2O InterMountainResources Fax :208- 263 -7013 Jul 15 '03 10:55 P.07 • • Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each 1-0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 2 -0 Will the project require any firm of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Pa e 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3-0 S - Continue to Question 2-1 3 -0 Will the project require worlc, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water marls is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-1 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5-0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 6-0 - Continue to Question 6-0 RECE E03---0a0 WED —MTy DEVELOPMENT InterMountainResources Fax • Part A (continued) Jul 15 '03 10:56 P.08 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This docs not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18-13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. ecklist Complete S — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work bebw the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered art C. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the ' preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. e circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; ur a hnrti curfnee nran thnt (antes wntnr to nun nffthn mnrfatee in grenter minority or nt no intnrAOnii rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle REC appropriate response. - Continue to Question 2-0 YES - ontinue to Question 1-4 Eo3oo E COMM IVED DEVELOPMENT InterMountainResources Fax • Jul 15 '03 10:57 P.09 • 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2-0 • YF.S - (i,nl inur. 11T f 1ur.l inn 7,41 n_..r 1 . Tl.._ -.. �....t- ..... -'1. '1'...- a.1.... L..l..... f j.....f....aa. 4L_4 .1. n....t.......w ..1. question carefully, considering all pnases of your protect Including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled malntoaanoo. Continuo to tho not quostion as dirootod for oaoh No or Yoe auswor. 2 -1 Will the project involve clmiring within 200 feet of the ordinary high wader 'na k of a watercourse or the Crccn/Duwrunish or Dlack Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 2-2 S-S Will day yavjvv1. isarvlry 1,1vaauag vfauy kwo rriasisa 200 fwi of da.. vaaliasasy luis1a Wawa wads of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self- szappc.rti nu w.aa.4y plant. c}awractcrizcd try twti naaiaa traa.alc. wish w p. ec.at.wl diwmckcr.. breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 WC - Continue: to ()iteration ?.1 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 , 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-0 YES - Continue to Question 3-0 RECEIVED COMMUNDY DEVELOPMENT ��3 -020 InterMounta1nResources Fax :208- 263 -7013 • Jul 15 '03 10:58 P.10 Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not Umited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3-2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by sahnonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3-3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3-4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3.5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3-6 R E C E IV o ED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT InterMountainResources Fax:208- 263 -7013 Jul 15 '03 11:00 P.11 III '!!I ! III • 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or vv acids that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid ure ?. Such areas may it;clnde, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse .or liver that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to saimonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 • • • .. • • • • 3 -7 Will the project include the constrtnction of artificial waeet'vvays or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this, analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, Sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use or maybe attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate. response. NO - Continue to Question 3-8 YES - Continue to Question 3-8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap,;rock, log, soil, or :vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle Appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4-0 ' ; i , . • i YES - Continue to. Question 40 , ; , i , , i i i i RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Improvements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR THE • The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. (BNSF) Tukwila Intermodal Yard Improvement Project, Tukwila, Washington SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197 -11 -960 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non - project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non - project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. e(3.316) SEPA Checklist 1 City of Tukwila RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im ?ovements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Existing Intermodal Yard Facilities Upgrade @ BNSF MP 9.9, Tukwila, WA. 2. Name of applicant: The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant Agent Attn: Jim Morgan, Project Engineer Attn: Pierre Bordenave & Trent Hudak, Mgr. Engineering InterMountain Resources BNSF P.O. Box 1724 2454 Occidental Ave S, Ste 1 -A Sandpoint, ID 83864 Seattle, WA 98134 -1451 (208) 263 -9391 T (206) 625 -6142 T (208)263 -7013 F (206) 625 -6115 F 4. Date checklist prepared: July 2003 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1 August 2003 to 30 November 2003 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you .know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Wetland Evaluation / Delineation 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No applications pending 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Tukwila Building Permit. EO3-w RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT SEPA Checklist 2 City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Immovements - • @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This project is related to interstate transportation railroad operation and maintenance. The proposed activity will involve improving and updating an existing railroad equipment maintenance yard including the construction of one building. The project area will impact approximately 16,550 square feet or 0.38 acre of an existing 60 -acre railroad yard. All work will be done entirely within the existing BNSF right -of -way. Work will be completed with no direct jurisdictional water contact. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed site improvement area, known as the Tukwila Intermodal Yard, is located in a portion of the Southwest Quarter (SW IA) of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 West, W.M., King County, Washington. Approximate Latitude and Longitude is N 47 °30' by W 122 °17'. The proposed improvement site is located, per BNSF identification, at Milepost (MP) 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division. The Tukwila Intermodal Yard lies west of the BNSF main rail line in this location within the city limits of Tukwila, Washington. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle on Flat, dolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Not applicable. The entire existing railroad track and yard is developed and is mostly flat and level, other than the area where the proposed building will be constructed. The rock outcrop area where the building will be constructed will be excavated and graded flat for construction. SEPA Checklist E-D3- b?.O RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im ovements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils within the project area falls within the "Ur Series" (Urban Land). This is described in the King County Soil Survey as "soil which has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers through the additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations." Surrounding soils appear to consist of Newberg silt loam, based on our sampling, which was restricted to the BNSF railroad ROW only. No prime farmland will be impacted by this project. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposed work will require the grading of a level building footprint. The building foundation will require over excavation and backfill, involving 144 cubic yards of material. The existing yard will be graded and paved in certain areas, and the building will be within an area requiring excavation down to desired elevation, involving approximately 400 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion potential is very low for this area. The excavated outcrop for the building will result in minimal production of transportable fines. Soil erosion will be readily managed through the use of appropriate Best Management Practices, following the Washington State Department of Ecology's "Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington" 8/2001. BMPs' will be implemented prior to work activities and maintained as needed throughout the time of construction. Disturbed perimeter areas will be graded to pre -work conditions and seeded and mulched within 7 days of the grading completion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? It is anticipated there will be 1072 square feet covered with asphalt paving, 1200 square feet of concrete apron paving, and 8278 square feet building and cut out around building, for a total of 10,550 square feet of impervious surface. This is less than 1% of the work area in the existing yard. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: In order to minimize potential impacts to the action area, work will be conducted in compliance with the Washington State Department of RECEIVED Ecology's "Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington," dated 8/2001. 0;-02D a fMLART SEPA Checklist 4 City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im vements - • @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Minimal emissions are anticipated. Heavy equipment will emit some exhaust during construction. When the project is complete, the emissions will decrease in the project location and return to current air / emission conditions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: As necessary, watering will control dust generated from construction activities. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a perimeter wetland ditch located along the west edge of the property. This wetland does not connect to any waterway, and is by definition an isolated non - federal jurisdictional wetland. Runoff from the building or site improvements will flow indirectly to this ditch area via infiltration and vegetated filtration swales. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes, the proposed work will be in the upland area adjacent to the wetlands delineated, approximately 50 feet away. There will be no fill or disturbance impacts to the wetland area. Refer to the project site map /plan drawings for location. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste rrAterials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticii of discharge. �LJ No �3 o zo c ❑ MMUyiry SEPA Checklist 5 City of Tukw 't1 ENt BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im ovements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff occurring during construction will be minimized and controlled by erosion and sediment control best management practices. After construction, runoff will be directed to, and collected by, the existing storm water system within the BNSF yard in two locations. Runoff from the asphalt and concrete in front of the shop, will go into the existing system. Clean runoff (i.e. roofs, etc.) will sheet flow through a vegetated buffer to the adjacent wetland ditch. Overall, given this is already an existing combination gravel and paved maintenance yard, and the use will not change, there is no significant anticipated increase in storm water flows after construction compared to before. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The maintenance area and building will fall under the same waste management plan and guidelines as the existing yard. In fact the update of the facilities resultant from this work will reduce the potential for discharges and spills. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Best Management Practices (BMP's) during construction. They include: minimize disturbances of soil in the temporary access areas; temporary stockpiles located in upland staging areas; and environmental impact avoidance areas clearly marked for construction crew reference. SEPA Checklist RECEIVED grIellOgeTYNT City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im 0 vements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: All of the following are found adjacent to the building site and yard. The existing yard does not have ve X deciduous tre- alder, maple aspen, cottonwood, other evergreen tree: fir, c • •'• - •ther X shrubs: commo spirea, buddlia sp. X grass: misc. non -na i ' - aaiv grasses and weeds wet soil plants: water plants: X Other types of vegetation: Himalayan blackberry b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Minimal grasses and small shrubs will be removed or impacted as a result of grading or clearing the building location on the rock outcrop area. None will be affected in the already used for rail yard maintenance activities. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, s Mammals: deer, bear, el Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, - s . b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The existing industrial, urban quality of the project site would be considered to be marginal to poor wildlife habitat. However, work activities will avoid impacts to the adjacent wet ditch area and it's associated vegetation, or potential wildlife habitat. The proposed activity are expected to have minimal temporary, and no permanent, direct effects on existing environmental conditions. REcEivE0 o Com eLo Me T &o;o 20 SEPA Checklist 7 City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im ovements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Construction activities will require the use of diesel and gas fueled equipment. Electricity will be used in construction of buildings and then for lighting, etc. when construction is completed. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The most current building standards for energy conservation and efficiency will be used for construction. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No environmental health hazards are anticipated as a result of the proposed construction. Activities will be in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations, and building codes. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. All BNSF activities practice safety measures that allow for special emergency services. The proposed construction project and contractor will adhere to existing standard safety procedures and will have Health and Safety Plans in place. No increase in services will result from this work. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The proposed maintenance construction activities will follow all applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration (WISHA) regulations. BNSF will require the contractor's Health and Safety Plan define the appropriate engineering control methods and personal protection equipment for the health and safety of their workers, which meets Federal Railway Administration (FRA) requirements. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The project area is an existing transportation corridor and rail yard for the BNSF railway. Noise associated with the normal train / rail yard traffic is not expected to affect this project. RECEIVED 03-010 SEPA Checklist bEvELO MST City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Improvements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from this site. During construction, heavy equipment noise will occur between 6:00 a.m. and 6 p.m. or in compliance within work windows if defined by local noise ordinances. Existing operation of train traffic will generate noise as it does currently. Train activity will not likely be affected and will continue with normal levels before, during and after proposed construction is completed. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicable 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The affected geographic area is currently used as a maintenance yard within an existing transportation corridor. The adjacent land is the King County Sheriff Firearms Practice Range. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. The project site has been continuously used as a railroad corridor and switching area for most of the 20th century to present. c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing structures relate to administration and work / storage facilities associated with the existing railyard's activities. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not applicable g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Per the City of Tukwila Municipal Code 18.45.020, the adjacent wetlands are described as "Type 3 -less than an acre in size and consists of two or fewer wetland classes." i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None will reside. A varied number, depending on the nature of the current work, of BNSF rail yard staff will work onsite. This is expected to be a change of location within the yard, not an overall increase in number of total employees j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None ECEIVED SEPA Checklist 9 City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im vements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal does not change the existing land use. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The proposed structure will be fifty -four (54) feet tall and be sided with metal siding. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Lights will be used for normal rail yard work activities once project is. completed. These will be in keeping with the existing yard lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NA SEPA Checklist RECEIVED CoMmunury L' ELop r City of Tukwila BNSF Tukwila Intermodal Yard Im ovements - @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. All work will be along and within an existing BNSF transportation corridor. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: The project contractor will adhere to and comply with all federal, historical /archaeological preservation laws, should any artifacts or items be discovered during excavation and construction. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed via S 124th Avenue, a city street, then onto existing access roads within BNSF property. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, a King County Metro bus route is less than % mile from the rail yard. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. Access for parking is limited to BNSF rail yard personnel only. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Improvements will be to BNSF access roads only. Refer to the project site maps and plan drawings. RECEIVED SEPA Checklist EO3Qw DEVELOUp. . City of Tukwila "JUL. 15. 2003' 1:58PM253 952 5435 KENNEDY /JENKS -FWY • NO. 5542 P. 3 003 BNSF Tukwila tntermodal Yard Improvements @ Milepost 7.9, Line Segment 51, Seattle Subdivision, Northwest Division e. Will the project use (or occur in the Immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project is within, and part of, an existing railway corridor. The proposed maintenance yard project Is to improve efficient and safe passenger and freight rail transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed protect? if known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Not applicable 9. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable 15. Public Services a. Would the project result In an Increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct Impacts on public services, If any: Not applicable 16. Utilities a. Ci - - rrenti use service, telephone, sanitary sew sop is sy= em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or In the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The site is currently adequately served for the proposed improvements. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that lead agency is relying on them � to make its decision. Signature: __,��,ea /4IQZ'�,� Date Submitted: _ 7t/ /6/63 SEPA Checklist 4E03'p20 RECEIVED commutturvr DEVELOPMEN City of mimeo m 0 EXISTING PAVING 11 PARKING THE RONHOUDE ARCHITECTS 4 2064313665 10/10/03 / / J / \ /(2) BIKE RACK EXISTING PLANT'G EXIST. CHAIN LINK FENCE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SEE IO /A4,1 '188' EXIST. STRIPING EXISTING BUILDING 50SF- PLANTING BOXES 1 EXISTING CONC. PATIO EXIST. PLANTING AREA ADDITION Iq'-o" PEDESTRIAN ACCESS SAN EXISTING PAVING (12) PARKING qxlq IxIb' OMPACT i (2)STALLS gxlq • FIRE TRUCK TURN RADIUS EXISTING BUILDING (NO ►^FORK THIS AREA) 198.57' (2)STALLS qxlq /8 • (4)STALLS ; gxlq SITE PLAN SCALE I "= 30 ' -G" • EXIST, POLE LI (2) b0 0 81xIE.' GCMPAC- STALLS EXISTING PARKING NOT A PART 1 2 3 4 5 SITE LOCATION HIH U T,I \GTO\ AI SANTA FIH PUGET SOUND HUB CENTER (TUKWILA) 12400 51ST PLACE SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON T L AY CO E A\ WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON IstArrLEl BY KENNEDY /JENKS CONSULTANTS SITTS & HILL ENGINEERS, INC. CASNE ENGINEERING, INC. LIST OF DRAWINGS DWG NO. TITLE GENERAL G -1 TILE SHEET C -2 ABBREVNTIONS G -3 GML/GENETUE SYMBOLS 0 -4 KEY PLUM CIVIL c -0 EYEING SITE PLAN C -1 PIPING PUN C -2 PIPING PLAN C -3 PIPING PLAN C -4 CITY CONNECTIONS PLAN C -5 GRADING AND PAVING PLAN C-6 SECTIONS AND DETAILS MECHANICAL Y -1 SYSTEM SCHEMATIC M -2 MAINTENANCE PAD PUN M -3 MAINTENANCE PAD SECTIONS AND DETAILS M -4 FUELING SECTIONS AND DETAILS STRUCTURAL s -1 5 -2 S -3 5 -3A 5 -4 5 -5 5 -6 WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES AND 68850W31116 WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY FOUNDATION /FLOOR PLAN WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY ELEVATIONS WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY BUILDING SECTION WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FA6UTY FOUNDATION DETAILS ELECTRICAL E -1 ELECTRICAL LEGEND E -2 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN MIASHDOWN BLDG POWER E -3 WASHDON0 LIGHTING PIMA E -4 IASHDOWN POWER AND Tamil PUN E -5 P60100 ONE -URE AND DISTRIBUf1ON PLAN E -6 WASHDDWN HEAT TRACE AND GROUNDING PLAN E -7 PANEL AND LIGHTING SCHEDULES Y PROJECT CONTACT, John Loomis Kennedy Jenks Consultants 32001 32nd Ave S. Suite 100 Federal:Way, WA. 98001 (253) 942 -3414 ti EXPIRES: 04 / 02 / CONSTRUCTION NOTES, 1. MAINTENANCE FACILIIY OCCUPANCY H -4 CONSTRUCTION TYPE IIN 2. CUT /FILL TOTALS: CUT (CY) FILL (CY) TUKWILA . 1.100 200 EROSION CONTROL PLAN, 1. REMOVE EXCAVATED MATERIALS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ALWAYS KEEP STOCKPILED SOIL COVERED WHEN PLACING OR LOADING. DON'T LET STORMWATER CONTACT THE SOIL AND KEEP SEDIMENT FROM RUNNING INTO THE STREET, DOWN THE HILLSIDE. INTO STORM DRAINS, OR ONTO ADJACENT AREAS. RECEIVED 'JUL 18 20031 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT No. DATE OESCRPIION a REN9016 SCALE 66k 0 0 25.4mm 6 THa5 8M 6 MT DIMENSKR4 SHOO. ADJUST SCALES AcamaNcir ENCR 1100105 DRWN: O.McCLUNG Clam: BMW APPROVAL 85 GATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants, Engtrumire & &dentists 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way. Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON TITLE SHEET 95% SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 DRAWING NUMBER G-1 aF L_ P: \CAD \02\ 026127 .01- Tukwilla \General \G- 01.dwg Jul 18. 2003 - 12:33pm J 1 0 L. w 0 U m ABBREVIATIONS AN g peg p5 K 5 o = P gd j4 16; g 1:111;;;;i11 11 01 :1>: a ,flsRtht eii hNeliagRaa hEYIRIA AgPOOOP kzt SMi si .:3wawtiill P 9 a xl 1 0 . _ Ilan g 0 111111111111611 ddi illiiilli !bilk *Iiii$ illigiiilliili a3I3i3i3i 8Ez23iaiia9 EAS9v9i22§ iM satglil E a mIteal&PiICalhEdr a 1 1 1 f 55 ID! g , 1 5 g gl '; ` b 8 1 0 ; 11_ $i �; 9Ng i :d l XI 1114 a 2.zsgMOLAAabsWni-6888 Aeeg@eE E4dPa enter a .sgigiss as 901a59an y1;111 R4 t ..999991 �3j pp55 _ 11° y� W i � � 9 E g g Awir@ 6tsh Igxm Ile 8 Ng ah 00 :1 / ;1 4 4 .eK. ,- .....d ❑� QWW4iglI Q1 EftWa a :1111 Uas8 §elgila�atidggARAII B 6fag6 gs4aggagggasag EXPIRES: 04 / 02 / C SC ABBREVIATIONS Consultants 0 c 0 0 0 0 s 1 N • N Jul 18, 2003 — 11:39am P: \CAD \02\ 026127 .01— Tukwilla \General \G- 02.dwg J A 8 C D E 1 F G H 1 2 3 4 5 L CML/OENERAL 8Y1®= FIRE PROTECTION WATER (DOSING) SEWER (EXISTING) STORM DRAIN (COSTING) WATER UNE (COSTING) RECLNMED WATER (EXISTING) GAS UNE (EJOSRNG) • TELEPHONE UNE (DOSING) ELECTRICAL UNE (EXISTING) CABLE TV (COSTING) CROSSING UIIUTIES (EXISTING) FENCE PROPERTY UNE/RIGHT -OF -WAY CONTRACTDRS WORK AREA MOTS CENIERU,C CULVERT WITH END SECTIONS HANDRAIL OR GUARDRAIL WATER SURFACE GRADE CHANGE UNE RIDGE UNE FLOW UNE GRADED SLOPE DITCH CR SCALE CONTOUR MAJOR (NEW) CONTOUR MINOR (NEW) CONTOUR MAJOR (EXIST) CONTOUR MINOR (EXIST) VA v R 1 T i Q-p-► '1► ' 110 BENCH MARK SOIL BORING, IDENIV1cA110N NUMBER SOIL ZEST PIT, IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SPOT ELEVATION ELECTROLYSIS TEST STATION WATER METER FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION FIRE HYDRANT UTBJTY 80X (AS LABELED) POWER POLE STREET UGHT STREET UQR AND TRAFFIC SGNAL YARD LIGHT TRAFFIC SIGNAL TELEPHONE RISER GUY ANCHOR CATCH BASIN DROP INLET CLEAN OUT DRIVEWAY HANDICAP ACCESS RAMP CURVE NO. SURVEY PANEL MCLNYENT OR SURVEY PINT SECTION CORNER ELEVA1104 MARK (REFERENCE) ELEVATION MARK () FLAG NOTE • 0 ZI Q 0 3a 0 T RISER 0 W 14 4 SEC71ON OR (ETAL REFERENCE DRAWNG NUMBER GRAMM CN STRUCTURE CR PIPE (NEW) STRUCTURE CR PIPE CEMOUTION CONCRETE IN SECTION STEEL IN SECTION WOOD IN SECTION GRATING N PLAN CHEC EKED RATE IN PLAN GRAVIIED AREA IN PLAN OR SECTION SAND BRICK CR CONCRETE BLOC( IN SECTION GRADE FILL ASPHALT CQICREIE ON PLAN) ASPHALT CONCRETE (IN SECTION) NOIES 1. THIS IS A GENERAU2ED LEGEND SHEET. NS COGTRACT MAY NOT USE AU. INFORMATION SHOW. 2. INFORMATION SHOYN MAY NOT BE ALL JNOUSIVE SEE ALSO ABBREVIATIONS. 62. 1111 = 11111 =11111 1/ 1 1/1 1/ 1 AVAVAr EXPIRES: 04 / 02 /041- 1 ND. ORE 1 608P14N OF R VISKNs SCALE BAR 0 1• 0 25.4mm F 1W5 8IM 5 NOT MANSON SHOWN. ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY OCR JJDOLIS Mitt 0.YdUNG CHIOL LNSF APPROX./ BY: DATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Enow«. A: Scientists 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Bur' on Northern and Santa Fe way Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON CIVIL /GENERAL SYMBOLS 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 MIRING NUMBER G-3 P: \CAD \02\ 026127 .01— Tukwilla \General \G- 03.dwg Jul 18, 2003 — 11:39am J KEY PLAN A 13 D E G H 2 3 4 5 L 47 —J / s s s KING cowry 4e RCP SEWER T LEVEL 3 RBER cams DUCT BANK — - — — • • .. • _ •- - • . • • • - - 5 r 1' s ' A • _ _ s s • 1:. z • • • 7 PROPOW - BOUNCART/.- / • / ' • / / ;„.... ,.• \ ,, ,, , ,, ,, /7. , 4(' ; , , ' ' • ' / , . i / / / / / / , 4 . / ' / / / ••••■- / ....----- :., / / / / ' , • •- . _ . . ./ /. / ' , ' ./ ./ ,,, • .........1 ,,_....- . > ..- •-• . / ,• / ./ ••• . / I i .. ,, \ ' ■■■ • ....- r• ■■ • •■■• ■■■ ■ • \ \ ‘ 1 ; i / , „ 1 , ,• / / •/ /. ,'" • / .• .. / / , / 1 , - - ' '1;- O 5 10 20 zo 30 SCALE: 1100 NO CATE 01:SCRIP1ON OF REVISI0t6 SCALE BAR O 1. O 25.4mm IF DRS BAR IS NOT MEMOS SI" ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY ENGR J.L00105 CANN: R.51DUT OAR BiGF APPROAL Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Enchieurs & Scientists 32001 32nd Ave S. Suite 100 Federal Way. Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON EXISTING SITE PLAN 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30, 2033 ORAWING NUMBER C P:\CAD\02 \026127.01-Tukwillo \C-00.dwg Jul 18. 2003 - 11:38am 1 2 3 4 5 ( ^. EXIT COMP 0 coNNECT TO COSTING YARD AIR AT COMPRESSOR 2'a L,! Uu� 0 300 ize -ter` 6 CASING 5 LEVEL 3 FIBER OPTIC DUCT BANK 43 5 TIE KM 0801 *. WATER WITH NEW 611PW 4-SAN DIESEL TANK 5.000 GALLONS 1,000 0911011 PROPANE TANK 30' WETLANDS SETBACK 8,000 GALLON WASHWATER HKLDLNG TANK O 10 CONSTRUCTION NOTES, I> INSTALL 6"SCN 40 ASTN A53 STEEL CASING. TOP OF CASING SHALL BE 4' BELOW THE TOP OF THE RAIL. MEND CASINO MOIMUM OF 8' BEYOND EDGE OF TIES. TIE INTO THE EXISIWG 10i1RE LNE WT11 6'T1PW LINE. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKS IN ACCORDANCE W1111 NFPA 24. APPENDIX A. 3. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CONCRETE APRON OETN1. . 4. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIPE BEDDING MATERIALS. PROVIDE 6' THICK CONCRETE PAD FOR 1,000 GALLON PROPANE TANK. • CUT AND PATCH ASPHALT AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL PIP01C. 7. PROVIDE THRUST BLACK FOR ALL BURIED PW AND NPW I ES. 8. TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION SEE 60 SCAM 1".20 —0' `EXPIRES: 04 /02 / C) 1 N0. DATE DESCRIPTION a REN9016 SCALE BAXt O 1• O 25.4mm F 11.15 BAR IS NOT DIMENSIC41 SHOWN. must SCALES ACCORON0.Y MGR J1001115 ORMN: o.YkaLl1NG CNKR BASF APPROVAL BY: 911E Kennedy /Jenks Consultants EngInssr. & Sdentlsts 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PIPING PLAN 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 DRAWING NUMBER C-1 Of L P:\ CAD \02\ 026127 .01 — Tukwila \Civil \C- 01.dwg Jul 18, 2003 — 11:38am J L B c E H CONSTRUCTION NOTES1 1. FOR TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION SEE VP C-6 2. REPAIR ASPHALT WMI LOADED ASPHALT PAYING. 3. SEE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PIPE REDOING W4TERINS. 4. MITRES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE LOC./MOMS PERFORM UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION MD POTHCII ALL INTERFERENCES. IEXPIRES: 04 / 02 / (%) 44 120 SCALE 1..40.-0" NO. DATE DESCRIPTION Cf REVISICWS SCALE EINt 0 1' 0 25.4mm IF THIS 84R LS PT DIMENSION SHOWN. ADJUST sous ACCORDINGLY o J.LOOM5 WM: 0.14CLUNG CIOD: 13NSF APPRCNAL DATE Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Encdrueers & &dentists 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way. Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PIPING PLAN 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 ORAN% NUMBER" C-2 OF P:\EAD\02\026127.01-Tukwilla\Civil\C-02.dwg Jul 18, 2003 - 11:38am _J CONSTRUCTION NOTES1 W O U m ni m 1 ch o8 PIPING PLAN a a E • E N 0 0 N h N E P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01— Tukwilla \Civil \C- 03.dwg J A B C L D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 L_ S /. ' 4 < / 7,„, \ r r`� / CJ L = COSTING 485W e • a L: 7 (APPROX LOCATION // cij 0 ¢ 21, WIPED sw S7 N ��L .L /ZZV;O : // —.o ��� '7i .-; % A5 c>c L LJ - J Z (� < C_ LJ LJ i ,7 / /S \ / SAM 534 \ / RIM 19.70' IE 6.7 CENTER N0. DATE OESCRnON OF RCAS1O16 PLAN SDALL1• =10' -0• SCALE BAR: O 1• O 25.4mm ff T{46 BAR 6 NOT DORN90N SHOWN, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY DNA JADOMS OR.N: O.MCLURIG 0003: BASF APPROVAL BY: DATE: Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Enemas & Sd.ntists 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON CONSTRUCTION NOTES. PROVIDE 2• TAP AND METER TO EX6TINC CITY WATER UNE UI ACCORDANCE WITH 01Y OF TUKWILA STANDARD PUNS. PROVIDE CONNECTION TO CITY SEWER MANHOLE SEE DETAIL �\ C -41 C -6 3. REPUCE ASPHALT IN ROADWAY TO MATCH EXISTING AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD PUNS. PROVIDE 2• EVCKFLOW PREVENTOR (BFP) ABOVE GROUND TRAHSRION TO 3• PE WITHIN 6' OF BFP MOUNT HOT BOX ON CONCRETE HOUSEKEEPING PAD. [EXPIRES: 04 / 02 / 0 5 10 20 30 SCALE: 1' =10' -0• CITY CONNECTIONS PLAN 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01- Tukwilla \Civil \C- 04.dwg ORAWOTG NUMBER C -4 _OF . Jul 18, 2003 - 11:38am J A B C D E L F C 11 1 2 3 4 5 L_ •0 EQ OS E- c \ .•'" \ \//. •''\ Sa J: < •••'L STORM WATER CATCH BASIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES1 STORMWATER FLOW UNES. STORMWATER FROM CONCRETE APRON AND ADJACENT ASPHALT PAVING TO ROUTE TO COSTING STORMWATER CATCH EX BASIN (2.300 SF ADDED TO 0TING STORMWATER 3. All ASPHALT PAVING SOUTH OF THE FUEIJNG FACILITY SHALL BE LOADED ASPHALT SURFACING. ARMOUR DRAINAGE SWLE WITH BURLAP AND if YOR09:ED. TRANSFRON ASPHALT FROM CONCRETE APRON TO EXISTING ROAD USING A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 414. rJ j ASPHALT PAVING u — L) LJ < m USED 00. TANK S T CONCRETE WALXWAY s S /UR STATION 0 \ \ 2. 6 \ : ' \\ \ \ .s. 5 S LOADED ASPHALT PAVING SECTION SCALE NONE D_ello ODD'eD0_oDp20p2DolOoNo3040140o° SUMP (1W) PROP TN GRADt C\ COWS N <:2025 2025 . _ . ONEMMO GRAVEL ORAONAGE AC PAVEMENT BASE COURSE 3/4' CHRUENED WASHED GRAVEL E. DRAIN ROCK WOVEN FRER FABRIC GRAVEL DRAINAGE SURFACING SECTION SCALE: NONE TI TI CRUSHED SURFACING SECTION SCALE: NONE 1.5.20.10•'..;: t • • +/ • ".2610 BRNNAGE EEXPIRES: 04 / 02 1Q 0 5 10 7 20 / to 30 SCALE 1' ..10-0W ASPHALT PAVING SECTION SCALE: NONE TOP COURSE &SE COURSE AC PAVEMENT TOP COURSE BASE COHSE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVI00(6 SCALE BAR 0 1' 0 25.4mm 6 1N5 BAR 6 NOT COENSION SHOWN, A0AIST SCALES ACCORCOAGLY ELM J1DO■6 DI:WTN: RSTIXIT 0000 06 APPROVAL BF. OATS Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engineers & Scientists 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON GRADING AND PAVING PLAN 95% SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 0RAWNG NUMBER C -5 OF P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01 — Tukwila \Civil \C- 05.dwg Jul 18, 2003 — 11:39am J 3 4 5 L A D E F G H 1 SAWCUT AND REPLACE ASPHALT EDGE OF PAVEMENT FIBER OPEC DUCT BANK MIN 3 CLEARANCE TYP TRENCH SECTOIN n SCALE NONE Typ6 jtcaE 1. COMPACT NATIVE SCE AND BACKFILL MATERIALS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERIAIR BY ASTIJ D1557. 1001 N, /-PROVIDE C1EANOUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CIIY OF TUKVALLA STANDARD PLANS 005T GRADE �DDSDNC MANHOLE 4'-0 PE PVC LE 6.7(REF) MODIFY CHANNEL TO ACCOMMODATE 6'DRAN UNE RE DRILL COSTING MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE 6" PVC SEWER LINE GROUT ANNULAR SPACE AROUND PVC LINE WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT. SEWER CONNECTION DETAIL n SCALE NONE C -4 C -6 IEXPIRES: 04 / 02 /, dc- I N0. DATE OESCRIPDON OF REVISIONS SCALE BAR O 1' O 25.4mm F TH6 BAR 6 NOT °MADISON 51004. ADJUST SCALES A000RO115Y MGR J.1D0165 DRAM °AN:CLUNG BNSF ▪ APPROVAL BY: Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engineers & Scientists 32001 32nd Ave S. Suite 100 Federal Way, Washingt00on The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON SECTIONS AND DETAILS 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2CO3 P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01— Tukwilla \Civil \C- 06.dwg ORM/6 /AMMER C-6 0- Jul 18, 2003 — 11:39am J 1 2 3 4 5 L 1 P-1 1 1D TRUCK e 2 VENT TO ATLKS TWAIN 1 T T USED OIL TANK 500 GALLONS 1 T -3 I 4ORAN GRIT CHAMBER 0I./WA1ER SEPARATOR 1 T -2 I 1 P -2 I TO TRUCK C=n 11 FROM HAND WASH AND RE51ROOM VENT TO ATMOS e DRAIN f- 4DRNN PIPE SCHEDULE ID MOODS SIZE SUM L MEEK D DRAIN ALL B FVC DF KEEL FUEL AU. B E DSOC as PW POTABLE WATER ALL 8 0 E HOPE Cu GS NPW NON - POTABLE WATER ALL B E a CS PS PRESSURE SEWER ALL All HOPE LPG LOW PRESSURE GAS ALL E B Bs CBs 110 USED OIL ALL 8 E DSOC Bs V VENT ALL E B GS PVC AIR COMPRESSED NR ALL B/E G5 GRINDER PUMP LIFT STATION I is -1 1 1 P -3 I WASITYATER SUMP 115 -21 1 1 /2"PS 1 P -i I CLEAN OUT WASH TAO( 8,000 GALLONS CITY SEWER MANHOLE GENERAL NOTES1 1. SERVICE 8 BURIED O 00MESTIC ON FINISHED WALL) E EXPOSED MATERIAL Bs BSDC W a as HOPE PVC 8FP CBS BLACK STEEL BLACK STEEL DOUBLE CONTAINED COPPER TUBING TYPE K DUCTILE IRON GALVANIZED STEEL HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE - SCHEDULE 80 BACKFLOw PRE5FN1ER COATED BLACK STEEL 2. INSULATION AND HEAT TRACING NOT SHOWN. PROVIDE HEAT TRACING AND INSULATION FOR ALL EXPOSED WATER PIPING. IEXPIRES: 04 / C2 / Q' No. DESCRIPTION OF R£VI9a6 SCALE BAR: O 1' O 25.4mm E 1115 BAR 15 NOT DUJENSON SHIM. ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY EN13t J100105 ORIN: D.LIcULNG CHKO: BASF APPROVAL DATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engineers do 8eiont11ts 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way. Washington The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON SYSTEM SCHEMATIC 95X SUBMITTAL ALINE 30. tau ORAMING NUMBER M -1 OF P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01- Tukwillo \Meth \M- 01.dwg Jul 18. 2003 - 12:39pm J A B C D E G H 1 2 3 4 5 L 1_ A M -2 M -3 H 1 1/2 VW H Ilk iFC0 O. 4bNNN ti VC SLOPE %y 11' 1 Y i I I 6� FUNNEL II IF ItTTI I I 1 i C I I 1 I I I e� a© Ac . H I1F 'I, I ". DRAOI I I ' ��• IRAN c I ITw LPG NPR 1 A II I I I I 11 I �- INfFRV00A1 CRANE (REF) � n I I I I u I I. t Q AIR RECOVER 400 GALLON PRESSURE I AR -1 I • © t WASHER I ®� II ...mr, .b. iH _Th1 - WASH TANK 8,000 CN.LONS T -1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES PROVIDE VALVE TO DRAIN AT LOW POINT OF PPE SLOPE PIPE FROM WASH TANK M0 CAYLOK FRRNG TO VALVE AT LOW POINT PROVIDE COMPRESSED AIR MACK DISCONNECT. 3 PROVIDE 3fe NPW HOSE ROB EXPIRES: 04 /C2 /Gw NO. DATE DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS SCALE BAR 0 1' 0 25.4mm IF THIS &R IS NOT DROWN SHOWN, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY NCR: J. 00W S ORWN: DJkCL NG CH O: BNSF APPROVAL BY: DATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engines. & Sd.nUsts 32001 32nd Ave S. Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MAINTENANCE PAD PLAN 95% SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2003 P: \CAD \02\ 026127.01— Tukwilla \Mech \M- 02.dwg DRAWING NUMBER M-2 Jul 18, 2003 — 11:39am 1 J 2 3 4 5 1/2'Pw TOILET 1/2 1/z HOT AND COLD WATER PLUMBING n SCALE 3/8' =I -0' 117215-3 B.O.C. EL. 18.58 WASTE AND VENT PIPING SCALE 3/8' =1' -0' 4X LOPE a• Q C HOT AND COLD WATER DETAIL SCALE NONE WASTE AND VENT DETAIL SCALE NONE —1 4 —1\F— a SECTION SCALE 3/8' =I -0' EXPIRES: 04 / 02 / O NO. GTE OESQePIXIN OF REVISIONS SCALE BAR: 0 1' 0 25.4mm 6 THIS BAR 5 NOT DIMENSION SHOWN ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY ENG* J.l.0115 OR*N: D.MRIIANG DNI15 WISF APPROVAL ITT: DATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engines & Sel.ntMts 32001 32nd Ave S, Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MAINTENANCE PAD SECTIONS AND DETAILS 95X SUBMITTAL JUNE 30. 2103 COMM NUMBER M -3 OF P: \CAD\ 02\ 026127 .01- Tukwilln \Mach \M- 03.drwg Jul 18, 2003 - 11:39am J A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 L al/WATER SEPARATOR I T-2 I /BOUARO (TYP) O O I 1 O 1 V 4'DRNN 1 cc -1 I 1 T -3 I SECONDARY EMERGENCY VENT, MR2440F -8 WITH GASKET, GLIZATBFF & FASTENERS, ATBELC -NBW PRIMARY EMERGENCY VENT, MR2440F -8 WITH CASKET, GLGSKTBFF & FASTENERS, ATBEVC -NBW CLOCK GAUGE MANUAL GAUGE LEN( GAUGE, KR1G95ROFG END LADDER_ GRADE 0. 19.50 (REF) O DIESEL TANK 5,000 GALLONS 1 T -1 1 O--Eit f— itH —}F- -e- 1 O PWG, GL57PP4 HEK BUSHING, G.PB32 DIESEL TANK4,I II 5,000 Call.N51 II r -, II nil -11 II I II .1 3 /4HP TURBINE, FESIPW75 -9L2 WITH 4' X 9' RISER NIPPLE FE400168609 EL 14S .t USED 00. TANK 500 GALLONS 1 T -3 I R 16.5' SECTOIN SCALE: 3/8' -1•-0_ Y-al y-4 4111aElfil i.�_ 1E ,as' 111 1 1111 rrh -ems— I mT M I Tr 1 I I - 4iFTLUFNT SEPARATOR I 1-2 I EXPIRES: 04 / C2 b N0. 041E DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS SCALE BAR: 0 1" 0 25.4mm F THIS BAR S NOT AONST SCALES ACORKINGLY OCR J.LDWOS ORPN: D.Ud LR1G CHM BNSF APPROVAL ar: DATE Kennedy /Jenks Consultants Engineers & BNN.ne ste 32001 32nd Ave S. Suite 100 Federal Way, Washington 98001 The Burlington Northern and Santa. Fe Railway Company WASH AND MAINTENANCE PAD FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FUELING SECTIONS AND DETAILS 95% SUBMITTAL JUNE 30, 2003 DRAWING NUMBER M -4 OF P: \CAD \02\ 026127 .01— Tukwilla \Mech \M- 04test.dwg Jul 18. 2003 — 12:34pm J Sa to Fe fcilities }yard May " "27; 40340. :. rw .. BN /Santa Fer=fa iilities yard MVlay27; Q3 BN /,San ;ta Feefacilties yard 0 May2`7f , 0'3