Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E03-024 - BOEING #2-62 - BUILDING DEMOLITIONBOEING BLDG 2 -62 DEMO 8123 E MARGINAL WAY S E03 -024 To: Cpl,! tjy • ll u�1,cwi1(4 i • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Comma % ity Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION October 16, 2003 Leonard Astemborski, Applicant State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter is issued pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21- 04.156 and serves as a Notice of Decision that the application for demolishing one 41,000 sq. ft. building located at 8123 East Marginal Way South is designated as a Planned Action and no further SEPA review is required. Project Background FILE NUMBER: E03 -024 - APPLICANT: The Boeing Company REQUEST: Determine that the demolition of one building is a Planned Action and all impacts have been mitigated as part of the 1998 EIS. LOCATION: 8123 East Marginal Way South PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The current proposal is to demolish one building that is approximately 41,000 square feet and is referred to as the 2 -62 building located at 8123 East Marginal Way South. DETERMINATION: The project is designated as a Planned Action and no further SEPA review or threshold determination is required. This decision is final with no administrative appeals. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Manufacturing Industrial Center/ Heavy Project materials including the application, staff report and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA from Monday Through Friday, between 8:30 am and 5:00 pm. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Decision issued by: Steve Lancaster Director, Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.:_ I , (r6 4 / HEREBY DECLARE THAT Notice of Public Hearing Determination of,Non Significance 14 • ir #. Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of :Non Si gni fi cance :: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice` ir- F Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of .Action on Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice -` Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application:' a R F' •a ..3, a Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit :zkA __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other pD �j - G t 1;= = =U ::. :, r..: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 Q3 Project Name: Project Number: Mailer's Signature: o3-oaf 4.47L LA/Dcfr Person requesting mailing P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHEST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PA MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV (06EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* Y'^ I 1q3 ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT •rUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ()PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) FIRE () FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR () PUBLIC WORKS ( ) POLICE ( ) PLANNING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES. FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ` ITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU (() STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ,PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA () SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ ADMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN-UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW • City of ThkwA lCd? Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Demolition project at 8123 East Marginal Way South File No: E03 -024 L SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The current proposal is to demolish one building, approximately 41,000 square feet, referred to as building 2 -62 located at 8123 East Marginal Way South. The parcel on which the building is located is within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of the Duwamish River however the building that will be demolished is located outside the 200 feet shoreline zone. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Demolition of Boeing 2 -62 building. Applicant: The Boeing Company Location: 8123 East Marginal Way South Zoning: MIC/H Comprehensive Plan Designation: MIC/H II. REVIEW PROCESS This proposal was identified as a potential Planned Action as it met the requirements listed under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21.04.152. As part of this Planned Action review process, the proposed project is analyzed to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated as part of the 1998 EIS and also if the proposal is consistent with the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • E03 -024 Staff Evaluation October 16, 2003 BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The current proposal is to demolish a 41,000 square foot building located at 8123 East Marginal Way South. The subject site is developed as an aircraft manufacturing facility with a number of separate buildings. The building is outside the 200 feet shoreline of the Duwamish River although the parcel on which it is located abuts the Duwamish River. The subject site is zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy ( MIC/H). This proposed demolition is a continuation of the implementation of Boeing's master plan for its properties in the Duwamish Corridor. On November 1, 2001, a Planned Action determination was issued for demolition of two buildings on the subject site, buildings 2 -63 and 2 -65, totaling approximately 76,000 sq. ft (File number E01 -025). On March 8, 2000, a Planned Action determination was issued for demolition of three buildings on the subject site, buildings 2 -50, 2 -71 and 2 -72 (File number E99- 0035). On December 14, 2000, a Planned Action determination was issued for demolition of the 2 -66 building (File number E2000 -030). Tukwila's Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) is an important regional center of industrial activity. In 1992, a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared for the Duwamish Corridor master plan, a proposal to redevelop Boeing properties in the MIC over a 10 year period. In 1998, sub -area plan /EIS updates extended the previous analysis of the corridor's Boeing properties (about 650 acres) to the entire MIC sub -area (about 1,370 acres). As part of this Planned Action review for the current proposal, the impacts of the current proposal are compared to the 1998 Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement in order to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated. IV. CONSITENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan identifies the area surrounding the subject site as Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy. The proposed project meets the goals and policies listed in the Comprehensive Plan for the MIC/H area. Specifically, the proposed project meets the following goals and policies: Goal 11.1: Support the existing industrial activities in the MIC and development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people to Tukwila in the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. -2- c:\mydocs\Boeing 2- 62\SEPA.doc • • E03 -024 Staff Evaluation October 16, 2003 Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. Policy 11.1.8: Improve public access and use of the west side of the river, protecting owner's rights to reasonable use and enjoyment, improve employee access to the east side of the river and emphasize restoration on both sides of the river. V. REVIEW OF THE PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA Review of a proposed Planned Action differs from the typical SEPA review. TMC 21.04.152 — 21.04.158 identifies the process and criteria for reviewing Planned Actions. An Endangered Species Act Screen Checklist has been completed for this project. This Checklist is designed to evaluate the potential for a project to result in a potential "take" of Chinook salmon, coho salmon or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The Checklist notes that some hazardous substances will be disturbed during the demolition of the building and proposes a mitigation plan. The building siding is gallbestos and has tested negative for PCB's. Fluorescent light bulbs will be bundled and managed per Universal Waste Regulations; light fixture ballasts will be checked for PCB's and if any are found will be placed in drums and managed per TSCA regulations. Asbestos will be managed per PSCAA regulations. The Checklist notes that building 2 -62 does not designate as D008 per RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act). The existing paint booth and building steel will be recycled. The floor slab will be left in place and not disturbed. The subject site is within 200 feet of Ordinary Highwater Mark of the Duwamish River. The location of the building that will be demolished is outside the 200 foot shoreline zone. There is an existing storm drainage system on site. No changes are proposed to the existing storm drainage system. All impacts related to drainage will be addressed and mitigated during the process of reviewing the demolition permit. The project will meet all erosion and sedimentation control requirements of King County Surface Water Design Manual. Best Management Practices to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system shall include: placing filter fabric in the catch basins, site sweeping, covering -3- c:\mydocs\Boeing 2- 62\SEPA.doc E03 -024 Staff Evaluation October 16, 2003 containers with chemicals and cleaning the slab where there is visible contamination from historical industrial activities. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of the demolition permit. V. CONCLUSION The current proposal to demolish one 41,000 square foot building is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. It is also determined that all impacts associated with the current proposal have been mitigated pursuant to the environmental impact statement. Prepared by: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner Date: October 16, 2003 -4- c:\mydocs\Boeing 2- 62\SEPA.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING • • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner ty located grants the City tsle�p ee gents engine tractors r of q� repre ntatives the right to enter upon Owner's real roe located at LG 05 �r11/�Irr sv for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at (city), W /7 (state), on 20 07 (,(5-oMA -nD 431-6 fi4 & /l -1 (Printgm) g0, 3707 M fc l iv-o9 (A(L ) :V7— 4 — 9c998/2� (Phone umber) (Si nature) On this day personally appeared before me Lr004 Lt) /7-6-444602SK1to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. l SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS eq DAY OF ��b//) 20 3 n'1- C>n NOTARY PITIiL C i and fop the S`tat,eP f hin nU L �/J] ,_, residing at Aotly)/1Q2 CAM: ..""40071.o i% t _%f/((o My Commission expires on C:Wora's_FilesUted Booktsepeplan.doc,04/22/03 \Jane JD, 07004 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us • EPA lac PLANNED OCT A 2 ACTION MMUNITY pLOPMENT APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -PACT Planner: File Number: E o3 - .0 d. `I Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: PO —Q' Application Incomplete (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Numbers 1) 0 3 — 324 1 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: he MOLI S L ISoa; t,JGI BOIL-t) I Nt 2 -62. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 2 ER'ST M14-21 44t✓ 'J l 5 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: L &O/JR -27 4 7—&-7' 1l3 O re-Sk/ Address: P. o. 3OX 3707 t /c SC/V 66 /4- 9 S I Z/ Phone: (qw) S-7 Zs9 l% FAX: (`2220 toS Ste— 5395- Signature: Date: /6/70 3, • PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and /or accessory use located within the MIC/L (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. Es 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. 3. Is the prop sal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? �j05 4. Is the proposal any of the following: a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 or TMC 18.06.270; IJ O b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; PJ O c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold determination; or d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? If the answer to any of questions a through d is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the planned action process. COMPLETE AVPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Checkitems :: • submitted:: • - with; • application... 'Information Required. Maybe. waived in: unusual cases, upon approval ofboth Public Works and = Planning ; ..... APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. V 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist and Planned Action Criteria Checklist. 3. One complete set of 8 1/2" by 11" PMTs of any drawings submitted with the Planned Action. v ✓ 4. Application Fee $250. V 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA Review. Y Q 3 -2.q.9 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 6. Vicinity Map with site location. 7. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). 8. Provide four (4) copies of any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". RECEIIV D OCT 0 21003 °EvE oP ENT • • CITY OF TUKWILA ENDANGERED SPECIES ACTkREENING CHECKLIST Date: Applicant Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: L &oivP -O /" 5 r&- rn►g' onskI 3oX 3 ?o7, mic iw -09 sE;cirt.,& wf* 9S1zy Telephone: (f' ) S/4 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. • • Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project!) CO 0� including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, an <0,04/4 " ? ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes �F�T answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 1 -1 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. O Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 Continue to Question 5 -0 5 CE A 7774 -ci1Eb $ h s cT 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. AM Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 • • Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Part A Item 4: During the demolition hazardous substances will be mitigated by the time the demolition is completed. Environmental concerns: Gallbestos siding has been checked for PCB and none were found; fluorescent light bulbs will be bundled and managed per Universal Waste Regulations; light fixture ballasts will be checked for PCB's and if any found will be placed in drums and managed per TSCA regulations; asbestos will be managed per PSCAA regulations. Building 2 -62 does not designate as D008 per RCRA. Existing paint booth and building steel will be recycled. Floor slab will be left in place and not disturbed. • Part A (continued) • RF��sV ocj o F® � ��03 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that inclu4,� e�UN� regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time usP9i transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run or-the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 • 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be( infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a bk-i°FMRyt stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by �� allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. !fV"- Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. eContinue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. el Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 • • 00 �F 0. Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordie 4iigh? /i water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Revie <anh' question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, MFiVT construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. O Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. O Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross- sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, Togs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. O Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 • 3 -6 CT �® Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface conneuctn to° 4 another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat N711 �� conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside .0 T seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 � �i�JY� • r • 4,: Washington — Plant 2/Boeing Field '°c7o ..;� g g 7755 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108 °�i L X483 From Downtown Seattle S LUCILLE ST Propulsion Engineering. `,\ (PEL) Tram.... ;sate 059 N 7472 7473 7.271 Boeing m 3•369 5 Test Operations • Employee gates Vendor truck gates - - -- Fence lines El Boeing property n G• eneral parking pi R• estricted parking ® Bus stop Q Heliport Plant 2 S CLOVERDALE ST 1j South . Park ,- -, 15-30 Administrative • OIt ce' King County r lntemal nal Tenninat Buuding Pedestrian Tunnel 'Pedestrian Tunnel •?- is1Col'C Pay Window ion e • .Fire Station and `. Guard Dispatch Center tt• •?vf` `,.12 `�t e: j ti ` Pedestrian Tunnel • . Kinp County Fire Station A'• + and FAA Tower 2416 2.126 Jorgensen Corp Issacson Properly g, ,5-05 UJ, Bmi a 10 0 15.25 '14.13 s 14.11 P Thompson Site 14.15' 0 From Auburn. Renton. and Kent t 1422 Kenworth Corp Rhone Poulenc From Burien and Seattle Tacoma International Airport 4, Museum 1.0 Q of Flight Revised 4 -03 Developmental Center Copyright 20020 The Boeing Company. All rights reserved. • LOCATION ©©-:--:3©D L DEMOLFSH-2-62-:BUILDING VICINITY -VAP BUILDING TO BE _ DEMOUSHED SL CODE SUMMARY BUILDING CODE UBC 1997'1DRION, AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA . SEISMIC ZONE: 3 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: . V —N OCCUPANCY GROUP: F -1 TOTAL BUILDING AREA 41,000 SO FT BUILDING HEIGHT: 55. FT • PROJECT :SUMIVARY DESCRIPTION OF WORK: DEMOUSH THE BUILDING AND STRUCTURE DOWN TO THE EXISTING FLOOR SLAB. PROJECT COST: $350,000.00 CONTRACTOR: ' TBD SITE ADDRESS: 8123 EAST.MARGINAL WAY SOUTH TUKWILA, WA OWNER: BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE ' FACILITIES SERVICES — 'CENTRAL, PLANT 2 P.O. BOX 3707, M /S: 1W-10 SEATTLE, WA. 98124 -2207 OWNER CONTACT:. LEN ASTEMBORSKI 425- 876 -2594. KING COUNTY PARCEL NO. 3324049002 0001600020 DRAWING INDEX SHEET NUMBER 102- 062 -1033 Al 102- 062 -1033 A2 102- 062 -1033 A3 .. 102- 062 -1033 A4 TITLE FLOOR & ROOF PLANS END ELEVATION & CROSS SECTION EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION OCT 0 2 2003. ROKISO I DTI sv or .APPR0IED DOE ORIGINAL 650E • 130391 -01 J. BURT .8/11/03 gi__Ardzkrzisw ACCEPTABILITY J BURT 603 DEEM AND/OR 15105m SPECIFICATION 6 APPROVED DEPT. GTE APPROVED BT 8/11/03 COVER SHEET CURRDT REVISION I DATE CHECKED APPROVED 1111E ARCHITECTURAL MASTER BUILDING 2-62 PLANT 2 AO AM HO. 130391 -01 DM HO. 2-62—A0 «LT _S_TUK.dwg $7 6B1. La.Ott o.,.• . ae� ]0T -0' BUILDING 2 -62 DEMOLITION 1. Drawings are for reference only and show existing conditions. 2. Remove entire building structure and attached structures down to the surface of the existing Door slab. - - to' -o 30 -o' u' -ot ao'.0 0L rri =— 11Pa'a areal etc* r••A ✓ 1e.e7rau EL:.7I 9• • 4 1'.4•7 x47:4• ex Ma•w.l • et..•T: L e1. 7'4• 96' -G't •V 0000 . OAT t_. 4:44L3 102= 41,1'4.; S FLOOR'.- "PLA :N •! DAT• . 1♦ R•VI•ION INI B Y - C000. a! IN 4 • DATE IN 0.cMG:P --111.7-27a7102177. R•VI•ION am aY ti .CHKD. IT . � 5. 11.44 • Avoao R..a D0...1Ne • e.r: • ▪ 5 .8.41 • /hove, 7'4.4 •fiATroawe MI7..Z%s0.'•' 1.ivllro -. ur.lo.D4r[ %tom.. `. • • LOOQ $. ROOF; PLANg.-''CAMOU.LAGE PAIFFrf' THE AUSTIN. n i COMPANY;.;';,,K . - Additions 'ta-:Plant'Nb 2° e�l;,�;' ENGINEERS ANDSUILOER3 -;,, `�.. Sf.+ n- ����„�' •."' -. .. �:Boein :Axacxa£t..Comp�:up . Nu,dRbllw '. " �, �'. •.... SEATTLE''` ��] ._... . .. ,SS SHEET NO:. . vEACD. Me:. r._ 41. 5oi41n!:: `Mi,,:e.+a_ ?_r4)r.SCALE'�ia' -Po .;,,••'• •SOA @�7'.- �iS�11II i0I1? `=x'• 41,;41.. I n � --I- 1—i -II 146T4 (3441- 1 11Gir STEEL S..4I4 =C CCCCC C =CQRCEC CCoC` sae oaTAIL TRANSITS – --0 788 D•ala.a 4-CD 1 H EAST E. LEVANT IONh,.,e),OUCtN COW /A/45 • ,ScnLe . 1 NOTES: New STEAL 5...N i' IV e . At- L,TRANt51TE 5tDII4 AND:adA 5.70 se, REMOVED by boEING Aepn•EMEM" sERVICE5. 4 111 T..ANIS IT• � 127 8805.0 STEEL 5.A0.1 = TuUI C 4 Oita RATE REFERENCE ONLY CONCIeer D*4 • 4<15 OS IA GL acs -'1 EAST- tLEVATION CeTV2EN COLU /AN5 11 4 21 • OSIEL H STEEL : {•ANGL7� STEEL PANGLa-1 0054 GL•al OATH IIM REVISION / BY O CHR0.*1 - OATH •� • • en.,.,...,• • • • • • • SE • • • REVISION SS BV IN CIRRI BY •0.m>.1 • • • • • • w • STEAL PANeL OCT 0 2 2003 *irt s4 qNJ !,1Jµ 4LJ.+.1 BAST ' ELEVATION CAMOUFLAGE BLDG. • 21 THE AUSTIN COMPANY ' yam Additions to. Plant No. 2 vs.N�.• Boe�n�Airc�tPtComlat�g CO- NTRACT NO.▪ .. ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS ��• 5610-0 SEATTLE T.'6a.a o47.i. SHEET NO. ...er a..a9�v_d1 ••-- _ -•.,. .__ SCALE 9.m:« Seattle, Washington/ , • 3 -CA • r, COhpo71T1oM 'Root ✓.' OM I. TNeaAS% • - .COaO.Ua. STeeL OtCN.- • MINIM .MM...MIMM1MOYMMMMI.. .Mi1M.. M.1•M • MIN 11111111111M MIM •1M.y 11111•M1111 ... ��.....�. MIINIMIN.. 1111111 lv ®11111•111111MININI.eIIIIIIII Mi � �IWIMIUMU® ...�.. ®I.L91M..M.MY..�.wMi .MIMIMIM.MI�.MI ® DSD GLAS +, 1 _mil ®_O ��S�N V,Y aaaar aaa•aa�a�� - .__ - ' IN NEI MINIM ®Mf.M a1MIM00111111111111111111111 0®®11M�IM111 ®M0�® •�1. ®.aMI1111■IM ®M.IM.Yifi91 ® ® ® ®e1M11N1MV i ®1.1111 fa.��••••� ®O ®M.M....�.MMI_M0 ,•J•. �irrl-1• ova® QII®i •= m�MI ®1 ® ®sr_ ®IM'ordMm 11Q1 . _�1f&al�.�n, .C�ESLZsi�P_ ��.. ®/YlIQ ®19S Vii= �f11i111I W 1112 -.l pIM111 - - 6mi1 ® ®lil ® ®..�- ML.oMOO�I_ -a ®a�ll` MI.�O��i� ® ®q����ii ■ 1t' (1 • MMMMO■1111�l111MMti ®.! ®e ®M®11111•1A Iu1 _ M1.MS•.. ®.M11Y..oi.®.Mi i MINIU M.®ol EMI GCL. Ss+N _ ME NMI M...M......M....�l..iMM MINIM NIM Mi MO.I M MI it • al fa I. JS TYa _'s KaS— MI ri MM. ®MM.® ®0.111 ®1011f ®M. ®. ®M1M ® ® ®. ®_ 1: ME O�i1M�MM011/M ®000�MMfiMI�MMM�1� % gain IIr iGmI adwwll •aaw.lr3 ®ow1>1INOMw ®.®®MwKIMmEM �_.it iIIl ®elM.1IPl/1MEININ MIME► yM.M.BMMININMI ;.nu II�lI 111111111111111111111111111111111111M111111101111111111111111110111111MIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII a ,47 ._JCVlfaa 1111w111111Ma....111MIM1.YI..M1. M INN MMI NEMI NM Ill inlIMEIMM .li.l..� ®a..M.a.Mai•M.._ M1®MM. ®nM • '111 :''.II 1111 - • • 1.V.E57 tLEYATy10N B @"CNEEfilitOLUA):45. _x, 3 :gar • JrL /.!•;_4. / ... . OATH - i -• •V NM Olaa BT S DATE MI NOTES:•:. • • N(LVISION • - 3 -1 •4I • AIt•PGD 54su SE 9. L -41 • Ae.V17GI) Do.+N 3p01)1., X9.6.41 •'ADDdD"AeTgL LADDea. e- I- 56••ROY176D• - VP To pAre , 7<C i1W F.-r. -r«� - AUSTIi i.,,.t+•. P N s COMPAN - ' ' -•i�� ' - • ENGINEERS:am; BUILDERS 4i ° tpptWe'Ui°T• F s tOniO . 1 t• 1' 14iM ?1E Nn.dRkmo° •�' '�".>QYSEATTLE st , .1`. mTG�.o°Tq°T ^LSi. o -n+ t.lw. v � .... t. ^. at�aSCAL' E4ian3�5k :IVSeatt]eWAShulgtgn "�j4".:.. _ I•Li - .. .._ ....._- .- ....._._....._.._. ..._.....,.- --...— �' . -_� z. - .. wip ^'j.`�.f «�''�- a= i".•�'{3rsfE� .�.1: .xu+.i' .0 '.•.,� Y'. :%i����. ��!dilr v:J��.i�..il�`• :i;.