The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E03-029 - ROBB ERIC - REZONE LDR TO OFFICEROBB REZONE 6550 & 6542 S 154 ST E03 -029 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA DEC `i 1VIRONMENTAL L ``LO P M DEVELOPENT REVIEW 1.1 APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. / Eric LaBrie or Harley Mattson 18215 — 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: Signature: (425) 251- 62�2�2, , lit VK C: Uromepage \Tukwila\lcd\apps\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 Date: /Z, 3/ 03 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA Qet Planner: File Number: 7'3- (�d,4i O4041 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: p v3 _ i 1 3 Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: L Q'2.)_ O7 NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Robb Rezone LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Quarter: SE Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. / Eric LaBrie or Harley Mattson 18215 — 72nd Avenue South, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: Signature: (425) 251- 62�2�2, , lit VK C: Uromepage \Tukwila\lcd\apps\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 FAX: (425) 251 -8782 Date: /Z, 3/ 03 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Robb Rezone 2. Name of Applicant: Eric Robb 3. Date checklist prepared: December 31, 2003 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing if applicable): Agency Comments The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications are anticipated to be approved by the spring of 2004. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No future plans for additions, expansion, or further activity are connected with this proposal at this time. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. No known environmental information has been or will be prepared that is directly related to this non - project action. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment applications by the City of Tukwila does not require any other permit approvals. 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist G: APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 1 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposed land use action is a Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment. The applicant is proposing a change in the Land Use and Zoning Code Maps from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Office (0). The site is approximately 0.74 acres and is occupied by two, separate single - family residences. The applicant wishes to continue using the site for residential purposes after the Land Use and Zoning Maps are amended. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Tax Parcel Nos. 0003200018, 0003200017, and 0003200019 Site address: 6550 South 154th Street and 6542 South 154th Street, Tukwila, WA 98188 Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 23, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. The site is located on the northeast corner of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. See Figure 1 — Vicinity Map, Figure 2 — Site Plan, and Appendix A — Legal Description. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined as "[areas] where landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent." G: APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 2 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General descri • tion of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, : _moderately sloped The site contains a portion of a steep slope in the southern areas of tax lots 17 and 19, and is relatively flat in the remaining areas of the subject property. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope onsite is approximately 40 percent, and is located at the approach of the existing access drive. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Soils Survey lists this area as "Urban Land" (UR) soils. UR is soil that has been modified by disturbance of natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. In the Green River Valley, the fill ranges from approximately 3 feet to more than 12 feet in thickness and from gravelly sandy loam to gravelly loam in texture. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Sensitive Areas Map lists this area as being an area where landslide potential is high. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No grading or filling activities are proposed. This is a non - project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? g. No clearing or construction activities are proposed. This is a non - project action. Use of the site will not change as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment; therefore, erosion related to use of the site will be unlikely. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. G: V +PPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 3 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off -site sources of emissions include surrounding residential and office land uses. These are not anticipated to affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River is located to the east and across Southcenter Boulevard from the site. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non - project action. No work is planned over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet of) the Green River. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. This is a non - project action. No fill or dredge activities are proposed. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 4 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. This is a non - project action. No surface water diversions or withdrawals are proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM map, panel number 0959, the site is located outside of the 500 -year flood zone. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This is a non - project action. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. This is a non - project action. No groundwater withdrawals or discharges to groundwater are proposed. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of animals or humans he system(s) are expected to serve: This is a non - project action. The site is served with public water and sanitary sewer. No waste material discharges are proposed. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 5 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals: Fish: Other: Hawk, heron, eagle, 'songbirds', other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, almo , trout, herring, shellfish, other: Rodents Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 6 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ✓ Evergreen tree: aj, cedar, pine, other ✓ Shrubs ✓ Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ✓ Other types of vegetation: typical residential landscaping b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No vegetation removal or alterations are proposed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species present on the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals: Fish: Other: Hawk, heron, eagle, 'songbirds', other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, almo , trout, herring, shellfish, other: Rodents Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 6 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Salmonids are known to be present in the Green River, which is located off site and across Southcenter Boulevard to the east, approximately 200 feet away. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. This is a non - project action. The existing structures utilize electricity for heating, lights, and typical appliances. No changes in energy consumption are anticipated. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action. The existing structures are located above -grade from surrounding properties and are situated such that solar impacts are not associated with the site. No changes are proposed. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not store or utilize toxic chemicals or hazardous substances; therefore, environmental health hazard risks will not occur as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe special emergency service that might be required. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not require special emergency services; therefore, no need for special emergency services will result from this proposal. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 7 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a non - project action. The existing use does not create traffic, construction, operation, or other related noises; therefore, long -term and/or short-term noise is limited to very low volume automobile noise from occasional cars entering and exiting the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for two, separate single - family residences. Uses surrounding the site are as follows: to the west is an office building, to the north is vacant residential land, to the south and across Southcenter Boulevard are commercial uses, to the east and across the Green River are commercial uses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site has not been historically used for agricultural purposes. c. Describe any structures on the site. Tax Lot 18 is occupied by a single- family residence constructed in 1957. It is a single- story, brick structure, and is centrally located on the lot. Tax Lot 19 is occupied by a single - family residence and a detached garage. Tax Lot 17 is vacant and is used for access and utilities. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a non - project action. The existing structures will remain intact. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 8 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? This site is currently zoned LDR — Low Density Residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current Comprehensive Plan designation is LDR — Low Density Residential. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is located within the Class 3 Sensitive Areas region of the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Class 3 Areas are defined as "[areas] where landslide potential is high, which include areas sloping between 15 and 40 percent and which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or bedrock, and which also include areas sloping more than 40 percent." i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non - project action. No changes in residency are proposed. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? This is a non - project action. No persons would be displaced as a result of the proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: J• The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will help to further the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor goal by providing a buffer between Southcenter Boulevard and the LDR uses to the north. The Office land use will be compatible with properties located adjacent to the site. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? This is a non - project action. No residential units will be provided. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 9 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. This is a non - project action. No housing will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest of any proposed structures(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? This is a non - project action. No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? This is a non - project action. No views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? This is a non - project action; therefore, light or glare will not result from this proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 10 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The site is located within approximately a half -mile of Fort Dent Park and the Family Fun Center. See Figure 1 — Vicinity Map. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. This is a non - project action; therefore, existing recreational uses will not be displaced as a result of this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific, or culturally significant objects are found, the State Historical Preservation Office will be notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is accessed via a 40- foot -wide access and utilities easement off of Southcenter Boulevard, at the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard and 68th Avenue South. This is a non - project action; therefore, access to the site will remain as -is. See Figure 1— Vicinity Map and Figure 2 — Site Plan. G:\ APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 11 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is not served with public transit. The nearest transit stop is located approximately 'A -mile to the west, at the Southcenter Boulevard and 62nd Avenue South service stop. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. The existing residential parking will not be eliminated as a result of this proposal. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not anticipated. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None are proposed. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. This is a non - project action; therefore, this item does not apply. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 12 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: 'Electricity' , natural gas, water' 'refuse service' system, other: sanitary sewer' Agency Comments , septic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This is a non - project action. No new utilities or services are anticipated for this proposal. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 13 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? There are currently no plans for development - specific projects for this site. However, should there be a future development project, the project will implement stormwater management practices to ensure discharge of water does not increase as a result of the completed development. No significant impact to air and water or significant generation of noise are anticipated as a result of this proposal. Production, storage, and/or release of toxic or hazardous substances will not be associated with this proposal. Future development - specific projects will be subject to a separate environmental review. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Future development - specific projects would be required to include an on -site storm drainage system designed to collect stormwater runoff in accordance with applicable regulations, and the site would be developed in compliance with the City of Tukwila's development standards. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Future development - specific projects would result in vegetation removal in construction areas; however, landscaping would be provided as required by the applicable Tukwila Code requirements, and removal of existing vegetation will be addressed through the environmental review process for any future proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Future development - specific projects would be landscaped in accordance with applicable City of Tukwila code requirements. Future development activity would be addressed through the environmental review process. Appropriate measures to protect or conserve plants and animal habitat will be proposed at that time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The energy needs of future on -site Sevelopment will not likely deplete energy or natural resources. Energy needs will be addressed through the environmental review process for that proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Future structures will be designed to comply with Energy Code requirements. GAAPPHAN /LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 14 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Future development projects will be required to ensure that the on -site steep slopes would be protected with adequate setbacks. Impacts associated with future development projects will be subject to separate environmental review and will be addressed at that time. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Sensitive area buffers and setbacks will be provided in accordance with regulations in effect at the time of development of any future project proposals. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment will not allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. All future development will be comparable with the surrounding zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Future development projects will occur away from sensitive areas, to reduce or avoid impacts and will be consistent with the surrounding land uses in the Office zone. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? The Shoreline Master Plan will not be affected by the proposal because the site is not located within a Shoreline Master Plan area designation. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? Future development projects will add to the demands on transportation and public services, and will be evaluated for associated impacts as required by regulations in effect at that time. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Future development project impacts would be subject to City of Tukwila development regulations, and would be subject to applicable mitigation measures in effect at that time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposed Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Code Amendment does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws for the protection of the environment. Future development will comply with regulations in effect at that time. G: WPPHAN/LANDUSE.APP \SEPAAPP.DOC, 08/31/00 15 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NONPROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The proposal objective is to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning Map designations of the property to Office (0). 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternative means for accomplishing this objective. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? The proposal will not conflict with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. In fact, it will help further the goal of the Southcenter Boulevard Transportation Corridor. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not applicable. G: APPHAN/LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 08/31/00 16 10751.001.doc [HMM \tep] LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAX LOT NO. 0003200018 That portion of W.H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40, Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 65 feet; THENCE South 68° 00' 00" West 155.16 feet; THENCE North 22° 00' 00" West 127.54 feet to the South line of Tract 27 of said plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along said South line 143.55 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. TAX LOT NOS. 0003200019 and 0003200017: That portion of the William H. Gilliam Donation Claim No. 40 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 42' 00" East along the South line of said Tract 28, 22.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East 178.00 feet, more or Tess, to the Northerly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 -L; THENCE Northeasterly along said Northerly margin to a point of intersection with the South line of said Tract 28; THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said South line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. INCLUDING the following described property: An easement for roadway and utilities 40 feet wide, being 20 feet in width on each side of the following described centerline: BEGINNING at a point on the South line of Tract 28 of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, which is South 89° 47' 00" East, 44.00 feet from the Southwest corner of said Tract 28; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East to an intersection with the Northerly margin of the Renton -Three Tree Point Road. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. EXCEPT the following described property: Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone December 31, 2003 HMM /ath 107511.001.doc COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of Tract 28 of the plat of Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; THENCE South 89° 47' 00" East along the South line of Tract 28, 66.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 24° 25' 00" East, 152 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly margin of Secondary State Highway No. 1 -L; THENCE Northeasterly along said road margin 178.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the South line of said Tract 28; THENCE North 89° 47' 00" West along said line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Source: Fidelity National Title Company of Washington ALTA commitment and King County Auditor's File Number 9307081653 (Warranty Deed). Project Name: Robb CPA & Rezone December 31, 2003 HMM /ath 107511.001.doc MA 100E Ta `Haz_ elnut • "'.S' *-4Tth lst lo? III —1 200M (ol '$sooft. 152nd (St 152nd P1$ SITE T,reck;Cir f�� er 1 02002 MapQuest.com. Inc.; 02002 Navgatbn Technobclia& VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 11 W' 4 Q 0. 110 SN61l�8'6 BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SOURCE: MAPQUEST.COM.INC. NORTH RoBB REZONE (BCE #10751) Tukwila, Washington AERIAL PHOTO '!4A kk . 0' 141Q EN al011. BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SOURCE: DigiAir NORTH ROBB REZONE (BCE #10751) Tukwila, Washington r -50' I l l s i 1i SITE PLAN FOR ROBB REZONE A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N, RANGE 4 E., WM TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Nktii 61r> 10 .... VICINITY MAP q NOTES 1. CON10UfS BASED ON GYTY OF TUKWILA GIS DATA. 2. 511E IS SERVED BY PU&1C WATER AHD SANITARY SEWER (TUKWILA WATER k SEWER 05TRICIS). 3. ALL ONSTIE VEGETATION TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED. NO DEVELOPMENT 90110111 PROPOSED. 4. SITE IS WRHIN COY OF TUWWIA COMPREHENSIVE PUN CLASS 3 SENSITIVE AREA (009S). 5. FLOOD ZONE AE - BASE ROOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED FLOOD ZONE 0 - AREAS OF 500 YEAR FL000; AREAS CF 10 YEAR FL000 WI4H AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS TWA 1 F00T OR WITH 0RAIWIGE AREAS LESS NM 1 SQUARE IA E: MID AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 400 YEAR FL000• • SOURCE: FEW FIRM WP PANEL 959 NUMBER 530091. APPROXIMATE LOCATORS 910WN 1 r�50' I l ( 50 100 SITE PLAN FOR ROBB REZONE A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E., WM TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ROOD ZONE AE- (EL 70) ' FLOOD ZONE rn A 1 X 5Pt1/4`) VICINITY MAP N T.5 NOTES • 1. CONTOURS BASED ON CITY or TLO09 A CIS DATA. 2. SITE IS SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND 5ANRARY SEWER (TUKWILA WATER & SEWER DISTRICTS).. 3. ALL ONSIIE VEGETATION TO REMAIN. UNDISTURBED. • NO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY PROPOSED. 4. SITE IS WITHIN CITY OF TUKWLA COMPREHENSNE PLAN CLASS 3 SENSITIVE AREA (SOILS) 5. FLOOD ZONE AE . BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERAINED FL000 ZONE X - AREAS OF 500 YEAR ROOD; AREAS OF 10 YEAR ROOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SOUARE MILE, AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FR04 100 YEAR FLOOD* • SOURCE: FENA FIRN 4AP. PANEL 959 WRIER 530091, APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS 540WN RECEIVED DEC 311003 11 ¶ 'I a 6, 8 O. rm50' 0 - 25 50 100 I1► ► LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ROBB REZONE A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E., WM TUKWILA, WASHINGTON a• NOTES • 1 CONTOURS BASES ON arc. OF TUKWILA OS DATA. 2 511E IS SERVED Br PUU&WC WATER AND SANITARY SEWER (TUKYR A WATER & SEWER 05TRICIS). S. ALL ONSRE VEGETATION . TO REMAIN UNOISTURRED. " NO DEVELOPMENT ACTMIY PROPOSED. A. SITE IS WITHIN CRY OF TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE 15.441 cuss 3 SENSITIVE AREA (50I S). 1 3 a ERIC ROBB N p 1 Uri m..ti�lfl n n.. nni.Itn,. namnnnf - na..t) *9112.471 19618' 56224'47t 44.00' SURVEYOR'S NOTES .. - 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS PER RECORD OF SURVEY BY GORDOR4 RECTOR 0m50 JANIWV 1991 AND - RECORDED N 901.1245 79 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 273. UNDER RECOROOIG N0. 9104199008, RECORDS OF 906 COUNTY, WASHINGTON 2. VERTICAL DATUM 6 ASSUMED. BENCHMARK 6 BCE 24; SET REBAR 8 CONTROL CAP SW CORNER OF INIERSECION OF 68TH AVENUE SOUTH WITH SOUTHCFNIER BOULEVARD. ELEVATION . 10000 FEET. • 3. ALL TITLE INFORMATION SHOWN 0/4.005 IMP HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM occur( moIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON COMMITMENT NO.- 0158650. DATED MARCH 7. 1997; AND PACIFIC, NORTHWEST TIME COMPANY OF 1YASH14TTN.CONNIVENT N0. 376847, DATED MARCH 17, 1999.. IN PREPARING THIS MAP, BARGI4AUSEN CONSULTING DOWERS, OTC. HAS CONDUCTED NO . - - . 96EP010ENT RISE SEARCH NOR 6 BARGHAJSEN CONSULTING EN64E06. NC. AWARE OF ANY 11LE. 654(3 AFFECTING THE SURVEYED PROPERTY OTHER DON THOSE 9K1WN ON THE WP.AND DISCLOSES BY .THE REFERENCi) FIDELITY 56110NAL AND P151915 NORUIWEST commons. BAR@UU501 COLISIATNG ENGINEERS. NC. HAS RIMED WHOLLY ON FIDELITY NATIONAL'S AND PACIFIC NORTHWEST'S REPRESENTATIONS OF THE TITLES' CONDITION TO PREPARE NO SURVEY AND THEREFORE DACHA/SOT CONSUL71N6 FNdNETERS. NC. 01JALSES THE MAP'S ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS TO•1HAT EIOOR. na - 4: THIS SURVEY 00E5 NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL MATTERS WHICH MAY BE DISCLOSED BY A .COMPLETE TITLE. i - • SEARCH. NO ATTEMPT ENS BEEN WOE BY 8ARW4AU501'COSl0,1NG ENGINEERS, INC. WHILE CONDIJC016 THIS SURVEY TO DETERMINE THE EI6T010E OR LOCATION OF•ALL EASEMENTS. WHICH MAY SERVE OR ENCUMBER THIS PROPERTY. _ . S PROPERTY AREAS WEST PARCEL. • 14.839 •SQUARE FEET (0.341 * ACRES) EAST PARCEL EATU4ENT PARCEL 10.796,2997 4 SQUARE FEET SQUARES F ET2(0.145 6 ACRES) ) - 6. TAR PARCEL NUMBERS ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE: 000320- 0018-03. 000320- 0019 -02 7. 89.051: LOCATION DIMENSIONS ARE AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM PROPERTY' UNE TO BUILDING: CORNERS AT POSITIONS INDICATED. (UNLESS SHOWN OTHERW150.) .8.. THIS SURVEY REPRESENTS VISIBLE PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENT CONDITIONS USING ON MAY 5, 2003. " ALL SURVEY CONTROL INDICATED AS 'FOUND' WAS RECOVERED FOR THIS PROJECT N MAY OF 2003. 9. ALL DISTANCES ARE IN FEET (U.5. SURVEY FEET).' : • 10. THIS IS A FIELD TRAVERSE SURVEY. -A SOKCA FIVE- SECOND ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION WAS USED .70 MEASURE THE ANGULAR AND DISTANCE REIATI NSIOPS BETWEEN NE CONIROLLJNG MONUMENTADON. AS SHOWN. CLOSURE RATIOS OF THE TRAVERSE NET OR EXCEEDED 1465E SPECIFIED IN WAC 332 -130- . 090. ALL INS1RUMENI5 M40 EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED IN ADJUSTMENT ACCORDING TO . MANUFACTURERS' SPECIFICATIONS. .. . 11. 1105 SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR 1NE OCCLUSIVE 165 OF 005 ROBB. R6RfS TO RELY ON 08.115E THIS SURVEY 00 NOT MEND 10 ANY UNWIIED PARTY WITHOUT. °PRESS RECERTIFICATION BY 886944615014 - CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. AND /OR. THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE .SEAL APPEARS a 8 U 0 LL .0 .0 O CC 0 W _O I0 co O CO O d 10 20 SCALE" 1.20' LEGEND -X- 01.49119W ETU E /1- 600 815E SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS REQUIRED PROVIDED 335' 444' 145' 193' 250' . 391 250' 398' ENTERING SIGHT OISTANCE( E FREW EE/I55iijj .LENTERINO stow DISTANCE (((116 FROI.EASTJ STOPPING SIGHT 015181[5 (0911E61 58)• STOPPING *Hai 01STANCE l(( WB FRW STOPPING SIGHT D15TAKIE E8 FROM =Ms Id BN2I 6 FL 18' BAIL OF R BOUNDARY AND PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A:. (18):- . THAT PORTION OF W.H. G6.lNI DONATION CLAN N0. 40, SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 23 NORM, RANGE 4 EAST, WM.. 94 5166 COUNTY. WASHINGTON. 0050448 D AS FOLLOWS:: BEGNN86 AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 28, OF ME 011051BAN ADDITION TO SFATIIE. ACCORDING 10 THE PUT THEREOF. RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON: . THENCE SOUTH 84' 47' EAST ALONG THE 5011111 UNE OF SAID TRACT 28, 22.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 24' 25' EAST 65 FEET: 11104CE SCUM 68' 00' WEST 155.18 FEET: 'FENCE -NORM 22' 00' WEST 127.54 FEET TO THE SOUTH NNE OF TRACT 27 OF" SAID FIAT OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE: THENCE SCUM 84 47'. EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE 14355 FEET TO THE POINT . OF 0E120194G. . STRIATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF 6590G10NL PARCEL 8: (17). ' AR EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES 40 FEET WIDE. BEDIG:20 FEET IN WIDTH ON EACH 90E OF THE FOUDW06 DESCRIBED CENTER IDLE BEGINNING AT A POOR ON THE SOUTH UNE OF TRACT 28 OF THE 64105,158464 ADDITION TO SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF. RECORDED 04 VOLUME 10 ' OF PLATS, PAGE 55. IN KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON, 119004 6 SOUTH 89' 47' 00' EAST 44.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2L THENCE SOUTH 24' -25' 00' EAST TO AN INTERSECTION WITH 100 NORTHERLY MARGIN OF THE RENTON -THREE 100E P0017 ROAD SITUATE IN ME COUNTY' OF TONG. STATE OF WA5101GTOFU, LEGAL. DESCRIPTION (19) , THAT PORTION OF THE WILLIAM H. GAUAM DOMAIGN CLAW, NO. 40. TN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4'FAST, W.M., 94 KING G01941Y, WUSFDIGTON. . DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:. - COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 28 OF THE PLAT 50 940OLURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE. ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN N3LDME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55. IN ICING 004141Y, WASHINGTON: THENCE SOUTH 89' 42' FAST ALONG THE SOUTH LONE OF SAID TRACT 28, 68 FEET TO THE TRUE FOUR OF 16G11904G: THENCE SOUTH 24' 25' FAST. 152 FEET, MORE OR LIDS 10 THE NORRWESTERLY MARGIN OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. 1 -L•. MINCE NORTHEASTERLY A1DNG SAID ROAD MARGIN 178 FEET. MORE OR LESS,. TO RS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAM TRACT 28: THENCE NORTH 89' 47' WEST ALONG 540 ONE TO THE TRUE POUR OF BEGINNING. 0 ig oi E_ t- O 1 rI b'^ u • CJ K W 0 0i EN p 8 8