Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E04-006 - GRAHAM JOHN / GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON LLC - RETAIL BUILDING
Interurban Retail 13038 Interurban Ave S E04 -006 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E04 -006 Applied: 04/06/2004 Issue Date: 09/07/2004 Status: APPROVED Applicant: JOHN GRAHAM Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Gramor Development Washington, LLC has filed a SEPA application for the construction of a 5,706 square foot retail building, construction of 58 parking stalls, installation of landscaping, and other site improvements at 13038 Interurban Avenue South. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township /Range: 13038 INTERURBAN AV S TUKW 0003000110 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. I —7 3Y Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Date City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS E04 -006 Printed: 09 -02 -2004 EXHIBIT A: Site Plan EXISTING FREFJ'IAY POLE 516NA6E - 5' -0" 'TYPE II' SIDEYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER - FUR/RE 25 FOOT CURB CUT ACCESS E4 549 24' 00" - 112.00' ONE WAY a !IRE BTARB 0K8 RET 1L 1,700 8 C 1.609 UBF : RET�IL 1,232 O. FT. C 1,171 UHF ) R AIL 1.406 80. FT. 1,339 UBF ) OUIZ OH RET IL 1,364 8 . FT. ( 1,286 UHF ) • • • • • • • ■CCC••CCC••CCCCCCCCCCCC•••••• — =— • •••••••••■••••••••••••••••••••••••• •■■ �•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••■ •C1C.7C1CCr^7: 1CCC'�1 FAMCC••CCC!••••••■ s •• MK ■` CCL•OC■ 10 •� L� c c �, MN _ 1•••••••••�■ ✓) 11••••••••=1: u b 4 0 10 549 24' 00" - 112.00' U U U a E 3 n PII. c a ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE R.O.W. r e c c 12'-6" 'TYPE 1" 7/ FRONTYARD LANDSCAPE ,/' BUFFER = INTERURBAN AVENUE c c c PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN= SCALE' 1" - 30' -0" c a .b J - 5' -0' 'TYPE I1' SIDEYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER STARBUCKS' 1,700 SO. FT. ( 1,609 USABLE 80. FT. ) OUIZNOS' 1,364 8O. FT. ( 1,286 USABLE 80. FT. ) QENERAL RETAIL' 2,638 80. FT. ( 2,510 USABLE 80. FT. ) TOTAL AREA! 5,702 80. FT. ( 5,405 USABLE 80. FT. ) TOTAL PARKIN° REQUIRED FOR BTARBUOKB AND OUIZNOS SUB. 58 STALLS ( 1 STALL / 50 S.F. FAST FOOD ) TOTAL PARKIN° PROVIDED FOR RETAIL' 6 STALLS ( 2.5 8TALL8 / 1,000 B.F. ) TOTAL PARKIN° REOUIRECI. 64 STALLS ( ADJ. TOT. FOR 10% REDUCTION - 58 STALLS ) TOTAL PARKINO PROVIDED' 58 STALLS ( 10.2 STALLS / 1,000 S.F. ) SITE ZONINQ' COMM / LI (LIQHT INDUSTRIAL ) 0 2 0 Z Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila " AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I ; D{c) HEREBY DECLARE THAT: eil-le/liaki41 S_O* 65 0 4 - fi Yittii+. bmC Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting , ' Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance ) Project Name: 17 t'' _. ∎,I raMe n Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt - Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Project Number: E D `1 ? Q ( Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice /7/7( ( Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 200 day of fin the P:G[NAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM eil-le/liaki41 S_O* 65 0 4 - fi Yittii+. bmC ) Project Name: 17 t'' _. ∎,I raMe n - ___ __ _ ___ Project Number: E D `1 ? Q ( Mailer's Signature: 4 /,� D, (i�K: , Person requesting mailing: .�4, /7/7( ( P:G[NAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHE T: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHOREUNE PER IT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( 1 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT EPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. )(DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE II KING COUNTY AGENCIES () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( )J7EPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION V_( ),K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY )?;11/VEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE ( ) POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES J 1M- ) HEALTH DEPT S \�L 1mNP f () ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE () K.C. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES VCf {JhC CISC LAS () O () ()SEATTLE. SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOSTER LIBRARY K C PUBLIC LIBRARY HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT 5c/�% {OLYMPIC PIPELINE �� J'. L VAL -WE SEWER DISTRICT -- t CL9k WATER DISTRICT #20 `' -C \ _ 4-(tl` WATER DISTRICT #125 'J CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PL.NG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDM IN ISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW P,IC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PWMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \C HKLIST.DOC City ofTukwila DePartntent o 6340 South .f Co Tukwila, nter o Boulevard Suite 00 a WA 98188%2599 yard . Suite 100 Development G Mr. Cory shelest lec amor Pro 1133 164tevelopment t Manager Lynnwood, WA 9 Suite 107 8037 City of Thkw Department of Comm To: Steve Lancaster From: Brandon Miles Date: August 30, 2004 Re: • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor nity Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM E04 -006 (SEPA Determination) Gramor Development Washington LLC Construction of 5,706 square foot building and associated site improvements 13038 Interurban Avenue South Project Description: Gramor Development Washington, LLC has filed a SEPA application for the construction of a 5,706 square foot retail building, construction of 58 parking stalls, installation of landscaping, and other site improvements at 13038 Interurban Avenue South. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None Other Required Permits: Land Altering /Grading/Preloads Permit Approvals City of Tukwila, Public Works Right of Way Permit City of Tukwila, Public Works Building Permits City of Tukwila, DCD Administrative Design Review City of Tukwila, DCD Special Permission from the Director City of Tukwila, DCD Reduction in required parking stalls Sign Permits City of Tukwila, DCD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Interurban Retail E04 -006 Staff Report Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth The site is generally flat with the steepest slope on the property being 5 percent. Soils found on the site are typical of those found in former river basins, i.e. gravelly sandy loam. The previous use of the site was as a gas station. The gas station was demolished in 2001. The soils on the site were contaminated from the underground storage tanks and two hydraulic hoists on the site. A letter dated April 25, 2002 from Environmental Resolutions, Inc notes that the containments that remain on the site are within acceptable concentration and does not pose a threat to humans or the environment. As with any construction project erosion could occur as a result of the project. The applicant will be required to obtain the necessary permits from Public Works. During construction the applicant will follow Best Management Practices and will be required to submit and have approved by the City a Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan. Following construction of the building and associated site improvements, approximately 88 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface. •Air Emissions to the air during construction and grading activities will be the result of vehicle and equipment exhaust and dust during dry weather. During construction, the applicant will comply with Best Management Practices to reduce emissions to the air. There are no known long term impacts to air quality upon completion of the project. • Water There are no water bodies on or adjacent to the project site. The Duwamish River is located approximately a half mile to the east. According to Environmental Resolutions Inc ground water is encountered on the site at a depth of 10 -15 feet below surface. Ground water will not be withdrawn as a result of this project. Waste material generated from the commercial building will be disposed via the sanitary sewer line on the property. 2 Interurban Retail E04 -006 Staff Report Stormwater from rooftops, the parking area, driving areas, and walkways will be conveyed into either a catch basin or bioswell. The stormwater system will be built to KCSWDM Design Standards. Plants There is no significant vegetation on the site. A majority of the site is covered with tall grass. There are no known threatened or endangered species on the site. The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan as part of the pending design review application. The proposed landscaping plan will add a significant amount of vegetation to the site, which will include sod, deciduous trees, and shrubs. The landscaping will provide a significant amount of screening between the subject site and adjacent properties. • Animals The subject site is located within a densely populated urban area and does not provide a suitable environment for animals. • Energy/Natural Resources The building will utilize gas and electricity when completed. The building will be constructed to meet current Washington State Energy Code requirements. Additionally, the applicants have proposed to paint the building's roof white to help reflect the sun's radiation. • Environmental Health Noise generated by construction equipment will occur on a short-term basis. The site is located within a commercial area of the City. There are no residential units that will be impacted from the activities taking place on the property. Land /Shoreline Use The site is currently zoned Commercial /Light Industrial and is not located within a shoreline area. Surrounding land uses are commercial and industrial in nature. The site has not been used for agriculture production in recent history. However, Native Americans and early European Settlers used much of the Duwamish /Green River Valley for agriculture. 3 Interurban Retail E04 -006 Staff Report The applicant has estimated that approximately ten people will work on the property upon completion of the project. No individuals will be displaced as a result of this project. The proposed development will have to meet all development standards of the City of Tukwila. Housing No residential dwellings will be removed as a result of this project and the applicant is not proposing to add any residential dwellings. Aesthetics This project is subject to Administrative Design review by the City of Tukwila and will have to meet the applicable design review criteria. As part of design review the applicant will significantly improve the landscaping on the site. • Light and Glare Light will be emitted from within the building, signage, exterior building lights, and parking lot lights. The applicant has submitted a lighting plan, which indicates that light intrusion on adjacent parcels will be minimal. • Recreation Recreation opportunities in the area include the Interurban Trail, Foster Golf Course, Starfire Sports Complex, and the Tukwila Community Center. • Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks exist within the project areas. During construction if any landmarks or evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance are found on the sites, work will stop immediately and the contractor will notify the City of Tukwila, Washington State Office of Archeology, and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Transportation The parcel is landlocked and does not have direct access to the public right of way. To access the site the applicant will have to obtain a permit from Seattle City Light and utilize an easement on the Husky Truck Site (Parcel # 0003000116). 4 • Interurban Retail E04 -006 Staff Report Restricting turns and internal informational signs will be used to minimize any conflict between users of the project site and the Husky Truck site. The Transpo Group prepared a Draft Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), which indicated that the final project will generate a total of 101 trips during the PM peak hour. 59 percent of the total 101 peak hour trips will be pass -by trips, the remaining 41 percent of the trips will be new trips created by the project. The Public Works Department is still working with the applicant to complete the final TIA. The project will not have an impact on the level of the service of the eight intersections serving the area. The applicant will be required to pay traffic impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be based upon the Final TIA submitted and accepted by the City. • Public Services The project will require a minimal amount of police and fire service. The site will also have the ability to utilize Metro Bus Service along Interurban Avenue. • Utilities The site is served by the following utilities, Puget Sound Energy, Seattle City Light for electricity, City of Tukwila for Water and Sewer, Qwest for Telephone, and AT &T for Cable. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance 5 • (GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, LLC July 15, 2004 . Brandon Miles 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SEPA Application E04 -006 Response Dear Mr. Miles: This letter is in response to the SEPA comments that were completed on May 24, 2004. The context and layout of this response follows that of the original letter. Planning Site Layout NOTE: The orientation and layout of this site has changed since the original SEPA submittal of April 7, 2004. The building has shifted to the east to allow for Starbucks the drive through to be contained on the site. Therefore, Starbucks drive through will no longer egress on the neighbor's property to the west, trees and utilities on the west edge of the property will remain, and parking on the property'to the west will not be eliminated. See Exhibit A: Site Plan Drive Through location The city has suggested a relocation of the drive through to the east of the building. We feel that there are limitations to this approach for a couple reasons. First, the drive through on the east side of the building will not provide enough room for the stacking of vehicles in the drive through. The stacking of vehicles will impede vehicular flow through the site and will result in inherent problems. Second, and related to the stacking of vehicles through the site, this will pose risk for people who have parked in the site and are walking to the building. We feel that the modification of the site plan, as noted above, will provide positive vehicular traffic flow throughout the site. Reduction in Size of Building A reduction in the size of the building will render the project uneconomical. The developer's constraint is to maximize the building's use for economic viability. 1133 184th ST. S.W. SUITE 107 LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 -8121 Mobile: (253) 370 -6382 Fax (253) 752 -0538 E -mail: rcionesc harbornet.com / d Member of ,d' International f Council of Shopping Centers Dumpster location The.dumpster location will be setback 5 feet, See Exhibit A: Site Plan Pedestrian walkways Pedestrian walkways run along the westerly line of the property. See Exhibit A: Site Plan Parking We acknowledge the criticality of the parking spaces total on the proposed development. Our current calculations in this project are as follows: Square feet Parking Requirement Retail — Fast food (20 /1000sf) 3,064 55 stalls' 61 Retail — Traditional (2.5 /1000sf) 2,638 galls stalls Administrative variance of 10% � 6-stalls Total Cc'j 6.Stalls 161 stalls applied to estimated usable area of 90% (Compleme e P king TMC 18.56070(D)) Given the assumptions above, with the utilization of Complementary Parking and Administrative variance, our required number of stalls is 56. Our current site plan provides for 58 stalls of parking. Therefore, we have provided 2 stalls in excess. Parking spaces Parking stalls on our site plan are currently within minimum standards for stall depth, aisle width, curb length, and unit width lay out (TMC 18.56.040), See Exhibit A: Site Plan Permit Application Gramor is currently processing a permit application through Seattle City Light for the area to be used as parking for the proposed site. This agreement will be forwarded to the city when complete. Ingress and Egress Easements are in place for the east site of the property. See enclosed Title Report, Parcel C easement Easements are no longer needed from our neighbors on the west side of our property (see Site Layout and Exhibit A). Gateway Property Site will no longer rely on AMB Property (see Site Layout and Exhibit A). Landscaping and Lightning A landscaping plan will be submitted with the design review application. SEPA Checklist 1. Question 2 (a) correction: "During construction, the amount of airborne dust particles will be minimal as there is no fill required on the development of this site" 2. Impervious surface area will total approximately 28,475 square feet. See Exhibit B 3. Transportation Impact Analysis - completed by Transpo, see enclosed 4. Location of stormwater facility — see Admin Design Review - Civil Plans Public Works Comments 1. Transportation Impact Analysis has been coordinated — completed by Transpo, see enclosed 2. Uncapped Sewer line— Public Works is to clean, photo, and locate existing line (this is being coordinated with Public works and former owners of property Unocal) 3. Outside grease interceptor — to be incorporated into design 4. Draining condition to be addressed by developer with neighbors. 5. "Dumpster to be set on a pad which will drain to a catch basin that will be connected to the grease interceptor" — to be incorporated into design Cory Shelest, Project Manager Gramor Development WA, LLC Cc: John Graham • ‘..PrRANSNATION LANDAMEFUC K * *FOURTH ** COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: May 27, 2004 at 8:30 AM 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Owner's Standard - Prior Title Evidence Rate Proposed Insured: liability company Amount: $600,000.00 Premium: $1,425.00 Tax: $ 125.40 Total: $1,550.40 Order No.: 10055804 Commitment No.: 800 - 10055804 Gramor Development Washington LLC, a Washington limited 3. Title to the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: .Tosco Corporation, a Nevada Corporation 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto. By Authorized Signature Commitment for Title Insurance NF.14.02.07; SC No.: 11727 Page 1 of 5 • • Order No.: 10055804 EXHIBIT A PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE STEPHEN FOSTER DONATION CLAIM NO. 38, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 40 °01'05" WEST, 920.15 FEET FROM A MONUMENT AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF A CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE DUWAMISH - RENTON JUNCTION ROAD SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET EAST AND 20 FEET SOUTH OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SECTIONS 14 AND 15, SAID TOWNSHIP 23; THENCE NORTH 49 °24'00" WEST 835.00 FEET ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 150 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH - RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 81 °44'15" EAST, 199.17 FEET FROM THE POINT OF CURVE ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID DUWAMISH - RENTON JUNCTION ROAD, SAID POINT OF CURVE BEING APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH AND 440 FEET WEST OF THE QUARTER CORNER BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 14 AND 15; THENCE SOUTH 40 °36'00" WEST, 20 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF THE RIGHT -OF -WAY OF THE PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY; THENCE NORTH 49 °24'00" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY 408.29 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 49 °24'00" WEST 172.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40 °36'00" EAST, 150.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49 °24'00" EAST, 172.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40 °36'00: WEST 150.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: AN EASEMENT FOR ACCESS ROAD AND UTILITIES AS DELINEATED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 6126721. PARCEL C: AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AS DELINEATED IN THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT IN THAT CERTAIN D MENT TITLED ROAD EASEMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. PARCEL D: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AS DELINEATED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT ENTITLED RIGHT TO USE EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7701240410. • • Order No.: 10055804 SCHEDULE B REQUIREMENTS: Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. EXCEPTIONS: Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Standard exceptions set forth on the Commitment Cover. B. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is 1.78 %. 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure costs, if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No.: 0003000110 Year Billed 2004 $4,215.56 Paid Balance $2,107.78 $2,107.78 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: Assessed Value Land: Assessed Value Improvements: $2,107.78. 2400 $228,100.00 $88,500.00 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:. GRANTEE: CITY OF TUKWILA PURPOSE: CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND /OR REPAIR AND /OR REPLACEMENT OF SEWER LINE OR LINES AND APPURTENANCES THERETO AREA: SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 1964 RECORDING NO.: 5683663 Commitment for Title Insurance Page 3 of 5 SCHEDULE B (continued) 4. Intentionally Deleted. Order No.: 10055804 5. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the land; and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 6. Matters affecting security interests in personal property which may be disclosed by a search of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) records at the Washington State Department of Licensing in Olympia. 7. Maintenance and repair obligations as set forth in document recorded under recording No. 6642756. 8. The land does not have a recorded easement that provides access from the - property to Interurban Avenue South. The access across the adjoining R/W for P.S.P. & L. Co. is by permit and must be re- established for the proposed insured at or prior to closing. Note 1: DELETED. Note 2: Evidence and authority of the officers of TOSCO CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, to execute the forthcoming instrument should be submitted. Note 3: According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured is Gramor Development Washington LLC, a Washington limited liability company. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of said party(ies). Note 4: DELETED. Note 5: DELETED. Note 6: The Company requires the proposed insured to verify that the land covered by this commitment is the land intended to be conveyed in this transaction. The description of the land may be incorrect, if the application for title insurance contained incomplete or inaccurate information. Notify the Company well before closing if changes are necessary. Closing instructions must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and approved by all parties. Commitment for Title Insurance Page 4 of 5 Note 7: Note 8: • • Order No.: 10055804 SCHEDULE B (continued) The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. Ptn. Stephen Foster DLC No. 38 WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING, PLEASE SEND VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) IN THE YELLOW RECORDING ENVELOPES WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THEY MUST RECORD THE SAME DAY, PLEASE CONTACT THE TITLE UNIT FOR SPECIAL DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS. IF THEY MAY BE RELEASED WITHIN 48 HOURS, THEY SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Transnation Title Insurance Company 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98101 ATTN: Recording Dept. (END OF EXCEPTIONS) Investigation should be made to determine if there are any sewer treatment capacity charges or if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. Unless otherwise requested, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this Commitment will be ALTA 1992 policies, or, in the case of standard lender's coverage, the CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office that issued the Commitment. A specimen copy of the Policy form(s) referred to in this Commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. MSN enc. Sketch Vesting Deed Paragraphs 3 4 Commitment for Title Insurance Page 5 of 5 Order No.: 10055804 Issued by Transnation Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Ii%,.TRANSNATION LAN DAM E . CA.. Transnation Title Insurance Company, corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See the following pages for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 180 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall be issued, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. Attest: Gri., 41,44a 4,, Secretary Transnation Title Insurance Company By: COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS President 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security Instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and Stipulations and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof. Commitment Cover - WA (Revised 3/93) NF.14.01.01; SC No.: 11727 Order No.: 10055804 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (11) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (III) a separation in ownership or a change In the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or to the extent Insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy); or (e) resulting In loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the Insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the Ilen of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -In- lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory Ilen for services, labor or materials over the lien of the Insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and Is not financed in whole or In part by proceeds of the Indebtedness secured by the Insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the Insured has advanced or Is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgagee Insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (I) the transaction creating the interest of the Insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (II) the subordination of the Interest of the Insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination; or (III) the transaction creating the Interest of the Insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the Instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (Including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (III) a separation In ownership or a change In the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land Is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the Insured claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest Insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting In the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (11) the transaction creating the estate or interest Insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a Judgment or Ilen creditor. Commitment Cover - WA (Revised 3/93) Order No.: 10055804 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE (continued) CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1990 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (II) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these 'laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the Insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth -in- lending law. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the Insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state Insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. SCHEDULE B STANDARD EXCEPTIONS SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under Workmans' Compensation Acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. <var IF "3" = "1" "" ""> Commitment Cover - WA (Revised 3/93) 6126721 MAY -11 -2004 10 05 FROM T CBELLEVUE) CUMMLHC 1 HL I U •iii454bJi)i NTS AGentrefff, made this ' 1 ( 2 ) darer 1 1 . 4 , A , t ice, between THE CITY OF SEATTLE , a IAW1Ci pal Cerporetion, hereinafter called the "City" and TOTEM PONTIAC INC , 13C.ROBERT OLDRIGHT THELMA OLDRIGHT bin wits, heare- inafter called the t±renteee, alley is That for and, 113 coneideratlon of the sin of IVO 1:110t WD 70011 8UITOZ) 1l=tLA ($2,400), receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, it is agreed by and between the teatime Nhereto as follnvs :. 1. The City be obi t rate to the mss, their successors an& waives, an easement for an access —ad and utility purpose, over and across the Zollauing de* scribed real property, to wit; That portion of the Stephen boater Donation Claim No. 38 Lathe NE 0 of Cection 15, 2brnship 23 nOrtb, Rene* h lest, Y.11., in Kind County, Washington, being a strip of lead lying 30 feet on each aide of and adjoining a centerline, described se follows: Commencing at a point which haze North 40001'O5' Vest 900.15 feet trope a noncom* at the ps nt of intersection of a curie on the center line of the DnM .isb Renton .h ectic@ Vend, said point of lntersectioa being apprvrinatsly 3000 fret east and 20 feet south of the quarter corner between Sections 3k had 15, lbws- ship 23 Worth, Sea®, 4 last, V il., theme Nortb 4902ti'00 West on a line 100.00 feet distant from and parallel with the center line At the said Dawanieh Craton .!unction Road, a distance of 835.00 feet to a point which bears Worth 9104115" lost 199.17 feet from a 'aoale.snt at the end of a curve on-the canter line of the acid Dwgst •h n►nton Junction Road�t soil end of curve being npproeinately 1200 feet north and 440 feet wet of the quarter corner between as44 Section', 111 and 152 tomes South 40036'0O" West 20 feet to the northeasterly saris of The City of Seottls's' ..ratitamiuion line sten of way, thaws* North 49.2400::" Woat a1or., said northeasterly margin 326.21 feet to the true point of beginning of said abater line: tbeaee South 4ue36'00" West 100 feet to the point of Unease a of Mid center. Tina in the vauthwesterJy sprain of said transmission line right of way. . P. the oonetrvctlon of said .eaves road shall be st the existing grade end the construction, mo:.n.►nnnee, operation and nee of said ernes road and utilities shall be at turn sole o.at and axpmnM of the Ortntees, and occupancy of said pr- iperty by the Grantee' shall in no way intsrfer•. ._ -.. .be present or fwtul'e use of 0104 property by the City for any purpose cot tnco.. ... Lb. 'use thereof ibr acid ueccse rood, and for utilities therein when sutwrited under Persgralab 7 below. Should any of the City's utilities be damaged or disturbed by resaoa of the con" otructi.on, maintenance, operation arum of said renWhlay, the City may repair sueb feellisiea and the Grantees 'shall pay the asst of ouch repair. 3. The Grantee* 61so11 at no tine Sntertere with the City'u access to pad over paid !property. 4. In O.e event the easement herein granted be abandoned by the Grantees, their heirs, nucc -..ore or sasi$ns, Chia easement eba31 terminate and revert .,e the City, itn auceesoora or east. n. k1� Grantees nice that the City shall not be liable for any deluge to said r- r :awny ,r uttlttlea by reeeoo of any construction, alteration or maintenance of �,1 „�•umr :. :- ;. :•, :'. ± ••„ E.,ld property by the City, itt agents or repreaentstives. tr.r at N::qu, it u1 VIHY 1'- 10414 116;10 F- UI'I ltitLLtVUG) LU1'11'I.RL JML ill J1G1YJ .V 1 1J1 V 4882 FE( 495 6. Tee Grantees agree to indemnify and ammo tr!t.rlees 0.41 N1:7 a,;; n.t" n? claims, action*, or damage. of Gayland or description rainhmey accrue to orb* suf- fered by any person or persons or property by reasoner the construction, maintenance, operation or use of said midway or utilities, or the nee or occupancy of said property. by the Grantees, their successors or assigns. In the ogee of any suit or action brought against the City by reason tbersot, the Grantees, their hairs, successors *resolve, • — will upon antics to than of the eteMeacsrryt thereof, dmfand snob salt or action et E9their sole cost and expanse and Pill fully satisfy the final judgment rendered in any such action. CV 7. Me Grantees agree to a•ostruet said roadway and any utilities which the "G Creator hereafter authorises the Grantee or others to install, in gush s sam»r that access will be provided at all times to sod from the Grantor's lands *Opining the northeeeterly and southeasterly margins of said roadway; and to construct said *eases road in ouch s manner as to provide adequate drainage faeiltt1 $ for the disposal of aurface waters. Plans for the instillation of arm utilities over, nader and across *aid tr euesissifn line el,d'ut of war shall be submitted to The City of Seattle es a part Of cue app11c41/14 by the Creataes, or say *their patron or corporation, publio . or private, for permission to install the saes, and in the *rant such permission is granted, be approved by the Grantor prior to construction. 8. Toe easements and covenants of the Grantees heroin are port of the consid- eration for the granting of this easement, and to tba event of default or failure by the Grantees le the psrforaMacc of wet the terms or coalitions hereof, all rights and privileges Of the Greaten hereunder shall cease, and said easement *ball termi- nate And revert to the City. its suceeseoss or assigns. MM. to exorcise tide right it any A..Articular time shall not limit the City's future riot to 4o s0. . TX V OEM YIOGX0?, the City has caused this ag eaasat to be executed 'uy its Mayor and City Comptroller pursuant to ordinance "Me , and the Grantees have executed the *Aft this leer - day cf tie r 1966. j • r. ''ttFF • r. - SP: CITY or SV. m Reyes gran �'. _ 4S1‘, a-... . r . .... +l t.swr. City Oomptwller 41(4044 rrt L. o • 1 elms Old •ighwy TOTEM PONfIAC, IAC. Ry • -. '- -•- (BELLEVUE) COMMERcial 7701240410 RIGHT TO USE EASEMENT FOR GOOD AND VAI.t',i3LE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency where . '9 hereby acknowledged, the Grantor, ROBERT OLDRIGHT and THELMA OLDRIIGHT , hereby grant:. .o UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a Corporation, and its hei•:,, assigns, Lu.?sts, liconsoos and pormittees, a nun - exclusive, perpetual right to enjoy, and use the following described propocty situatod in Kine County, Washington for the purposes of ingress and ogress.• Ar That portion of the Stephen foster Donation Claim No. 38, in Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4 cast, W. M. in King County, Washington desciibod as follows; Commencing at a point which bears North 40 °01'05" west 920.15 feet from a monument at the point of intersection of a curve on the centerline of the uu.:umich— Renton Junction Road, said point of Intersection being approximately 1000 feet east and 20 feet south of the quarter corner. :, tween .,- . :ti,.as 14 .‘1 1S, :.3 id township 23, thence north 49 °24'00" west 835.00 feet or, a line parallel to and 150 fuel northeasterly of the centerline of said Duwamish- Renton Junction Road, to a point which hears north 81 °44'15" east 1;iJ.17 feet f1om the point of curve on the centerline of saidDuwariitsh- Renton Junction Road, said point of curve beiny approximately 1200 feet north and 440 feet west of the quarter corner between said sections 14 and 15; thence south 40°36'00" west 20 feel to the northeasterly margin of the right -of -way of the Puget Sound Elect.•. .._it...ay; thence north 49 °24' west along said right -of -way 4ut•. "el ''' to the true point of beginning; thence north 40°30' east 22.50 feet; thence south 49024' east a distance of 30.00 feet; thence south 40 °36' west. a distance of 22.50 feet; thence north 49 °24' west 30.00 feet to e true point of beginning. DATED this day of , 1975. 4-LL. 6'6°-4-6" tobcrt Leslie Oldrtght GO-4,4, .6. - Thoihtia Oldriilht NHY-ii -6004 rKU NI (BELLEVUE) COMMERCIH, TO STATE OF C OU NTy or SS 912143467131 < On this day of? a-• "-.6 "-" 1-` in the year A.D. 1975, before me '1 ...?'„) :i.,---1 .,1. a�'r <Z S , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residitg therein and)duly commissioned and sworn, personally O appeared Robert Leslie Oldrinht and Thelma Oldriahl personally known to me — to be the persons whose names are suL• scribed to the within instrument and 0 O acKnowiedged to me that they executed the same as their free and voluntary act .cr and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. J r` IN WITNESS WHEREOI', I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official 1 seal the day and year in this certification first above written. Notary" Public in and for said Courisy,and: '/ State. My Commission expJrs' - . y P.03/n7 6642756 ROAD EASEMENTS robert oldright and THELMA Oldright do hereby grant the union oil eompany vt ''nlifornin the irrevocable permission to use that certain non- cxelusive easement nt:l' width on the City Light Right of Way, more properly described by the inrtru- ^rr.t recorded January 10, 1967 King County File 06126721 dated 15 November 1466 In accordance with the attendant conditions; together with irrevocable and non - exclusive •e,r.etaent'in. on and 'across the.folloving described property: .That:portion of the Steven.Foster and C. C. Lewis donation claims in sections 14 and Township 23 Norths•Rafee 4 East. W.N., in King County, Washington.. described (o :ilOWs: • ! at inhifb dlars•North 40 degrees L'5" West a distance of 920.15 feet troq;t rrottyment: !llub' a tha�P. L; of a curve on the centerline of the Duwaciisl- � ...�,1 • . ' Renton 'Jinet.ibe'reedt-.�naw,,;pppyed ;(.aid P. 1., being approximately 1,000 feet East and south of the quarter` corner between Sections 14 and 15, Township 23 North. ,.hange,'o East, W.N., in King 'aunty, Washington; thence North 49 de &roes 2 -' WePt •Line 15+1.011 feet d6tant. from and parallel with the centerline of Ow aid .Ouw : +mish Renton Junction road, a distance of 535.00 feet to a point which bears North 51 %icgr.* .:.' 15" Eaat }a•diatanee of 199.17 feet from it monument 'Hub' at the end ..ef . cirrc on the.centerline'of said Dustamie'h Renton Jun:tlon r,,d, ,old end of ;') Urvbeinc approximpte1y,200 feet.Vorth and 1. ..0 feet We =t of the Quarter corner het6 en said Sectiims•14 and 15) thence South 40 dcgrets S6' West ( a distance of 20.0 fvc'. to the Northeasterly margin of the Puget Sound electric ra11-rav right -of -way; t.hcncc. North 49 degrees 24.' West along Said margin or said right-of-way o distance. irf :326.;21 :feet to the:[rua point of beginning; thence continuing North 44 degrees 82.051( theucejleTth'40 degrees 36' 00" East 150.00 feet: thence South 49 'dtgree_i!2 ''00" East: :40 00':feet; thence south 40 degrees 15' 00" West 127.50 feet; :'Ch‘+rc.e South +9'degrees'2 -' 00" East 42.08 feet;, thence South .0 degrees 3o' 00" West cc,t 'c :true' poini nf. heeennlne. _.in.cotitlderation foi— Chlaieasement, T1ie.:Unlon Oil. Company*tl _bear the initial cost of construction Ycpaiir. of:-any 'road Oprovements the Union Oil Company desires to :de3a.slbed. land. aad•.after•the development of contiguous property ka?ahe Onenn• 0(1..iCeq:pany Witt bear 25% of the maintenance and Sarproi'ersonty on ihe: above described ,s.3.i0.0sgji11s`4th' 0.* OrNOVENBER 1969 . • • maintenance and make on the. above to the North and repair costs of road =1,; ! { "; �a1i :E;L,,'rsL tnnE;S>rretary MAY-11-2U04 1W:06 hKUrl LUrIrltKl.l HL I u I • U 1" 37;417. OP CALIFORNIA Cl.;NTY OF LOS ANOZLES )) 88. 71L14J'i0f 1J1 1 .✓JIB O,.this Stn day of December , A.D. 19 69, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of California, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared G. H. Hammen and E. H. Goliath to me known to be the General Manager of Distribution , and Assistant Secretary, respectively, of UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, the corporation that executed the foregoing inatz'i ent, :and acknowledged the said instilment to be the free aMQ.voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorized to execute the said instrument and the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my rand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. STATE O>i'2..:.7.•"X.'.' �7.. ) _ COCNTY OF 4.e. r,1J si M ►CCrnmi!.WM fe!,.we a � Wu. 9 72 . On,tht, A7,------- day of . - G �'.', in th aar A.D. 19 6!../ L ',i . agal: ,;�.. .✓ . a Note y 'before ms �—...� r9 Public to and for said Ststs, reeidtq� tjt and duly commissioned and sVom o�lly stn • . J . -.4" • ,41;,A,r- and :?' aer.,,e,C-' e, f0jC personally known to me'to be the pereoa2 ehose within instrument and aclnowledged to ea that '� t�' the sae to the free and voluntary ant and deed for the uses and y executed a ein ■me on 71....e..... 6 r)+oses therein mentioned. IN uiTNESS WXERCOT. 1 have hereunto set ny band sad affixed my.officisl seal the day and year in this certificate EitSi:abcee written. . No Pu•lic in and for the State or California, residing at Loa, Angeles. • GLORYN G. McI EE NOT:- Yl.Et!...CAL!FORkI (SEAL) • -415=122' ?2 Public in ' for• setae empires ' f' • JN Requaawl ..iriu',, • a ihWARD'1, =CLAN, Rx TOTAL P.07 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director May 24, 2004 Mr. John Graham, Principal Gramor Development Washington, LLC 11333 164th St. SW, Suite 107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 -8121 RE: SEPA Application E04 -006 Dear Mr. Graham: The City has reviewed the SEPA application that was submitted to the City on April 6, 2004. A revised site map was emailed to the City on May 19, 2004. The comments provided are assuming that the revised site map is the current proposal for the project. At this time the City requires additional information before making a threshold determination in regards to the project. One item that is required is the underlying permit that triggers SEPA. For this project the required permit would be a design review application. Planning Site Layout The proposed site plan shows a drive through window that will be located to the rear of the building. Motorists using the window will be required to enter the main parking area and than wrap around the back of the building and will exit on an adjacent parcel. Staff has some alternatives to this option: 1. Why not move the proposed Starbucks to the opposite side of the building? The drive through window could than be located on the east wall. When motorists exit the window they can turn right and exit via the access for Husky Trucks. This would require an easement from the property owner of Husky Trucks. Motorists leaving the site would have to be directed to take a right only so that they do not go into the Husky work area. Locating the drive through in this location would reduce the amount of impervious surface by removing the long drive through lane, allow for the building to have a zero setback from the rear property line, and reduce the need to remove landscaping on the Gateway site. 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • 2. Another possible alternative to the proposed drive through location is to reduce the size of the building so that all aspects of the drive through window can be located on one parcel. By reducing the square footage of the building, the required number of parking stalls would also be reduced. The proposed dumpster enclosure on the east property line will have to meet setbacks if it requires a building permit. The required setback side setback in the Commercial/Light Industrial zone is five feet. As shown on the site plan the enclosure is two feet from the side property line. Pedestrian walkways will need to be provided connecting the parking area to the building and connecting the two parking areas together. Parking It has been noted that there will be two fast food restaurants in the building with the possibility of a third. The two fast food restaurants will occupy approximately 2,900 square feet of floor area. The TMC requires that fast food restaurants have 1 parking stall for every 50 feet of usable floor area. If 2,900 square feet were devoted to fast food, the required parking for the fast food establishments would be 58 stalls. If we assume that the remaining building was used for general retail, an additional seven stalls would be required. Thus, there would be a need of 65 parking stalls for the project. The parking number will increase if a third fast food establishment were to locate in the building. Please note that the parking requirement is based upon usable square footage and does not include bathrooms or closets. Thus, it is likely that the 2,900 square feet will be reduced once non usable area is/taken away. The site map is lacking the required parking stalls. Measure such as shared parking agreements with adjacent parcels and reducing the size of the building needs to be considered. Administrative parking variance for up to ten percent reduction of the required parking stalls. Any thing greater than ten percent would require review by the Planning Commission. The parking spaces laid out on the site plan do not meet the dimension criteria laid out in the TMC. The minimum width for standard parking stalls that are 90 degree is 8.5 feet. The standard parking stalls on the site plan are only eight feet wide. Additionally, the standard parking stalls do not meet the minimum standards for stall depth, aisle width, curb length, and unit width laid out in TMC 18.56.040 (Attached for your reference). As Gramor Development will be utilizing the Seattle City Light parcel for parking a covenant agreement between the two property owners will have to be obtained. The covenant will be between the principal use (Gramor Development), the owners of the parking stalls (Seattle City Light) and the City. The covenant must state the duties and responsibilities of each party. The covenant and the accompanying legal descriptions of the principal use and lot upon which the spaces are to be located shall be recorded with King County, and a copy of with the recording number and parking layouts shall be submitted as part of any permit application for development. 2 Ingress and Egress 13038 Interurban Avenue is a landlocked parcel that has no direct access to the public right of way. To access the property, motorist must use adjacent parcels. Does the project parcel have easements to use these parcels? If no easements exist it will be necessary from you to obtain those easements. The site map shows that cars exiting the proposed drive through will exit via the Gateway property. Again an easement must be obtained for this exit and for a right of travel to the public right of way. Gateway Property As shown on the site plan, the drive through exit will be using the Gateway property. It appears that landscaping and parking will have to be removed on the Gateway property. Please update the site map to show the following: • Existing landscaping • Landscaping to be removed • Existing Parking stalls • Show the access road including location of adjacent buildings and parking stalls If parking stalls on the Gateway Property are going to be removed, there must be a surplus of parking on the site. Landscaping and Lighting The proposed width of the perimeter landscaping appears to meet code. Yet, a landscaping plan will have to be submitted with the design review application. TMC 18.52.035 (3) (a) requires 15 square feet of parking lot island for every stall. What will be done with the area of land under the transmission line right of way? This area could be used to add any additional required landscaping. Will any light fixtures be added to the building or in the parking lot? SEPA Checklist Please clarify the following questions from the SEPA Checklist: 1. Question 1 (e) notes, "Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill." The answer given is "No fill required ". Yet, in the answer for question 2 (a) it is noted, "During construction, the amount of airborne dust particles generated will be minimal and associated with the filling activity to raise the level of the site 6 inches ". These two answers conflict with each other, please clarify. 3 • • 2. What is the total square feet that will be covered in impervious surface once the project is complete. How much of that area will drivable surface? 3. The transportation section of the checklist will need to be updated when a new Traffic Impact Analysis is prepared (See Below). 4. Please show the approximat location of the stormwater facility on the site map. Public Works Department Comments 1. A traffic impact analysis is required since the property has been vacant for more than two years. The applicant's traffic consultant shall contact Cindy Knighton, Senior Transportation Engineer at (206) 431 -2450 for required scope of TIA. 2. Gas station demolition permit was never finaled and has since expired. The sewer line on the property has never been capped. 3. Any food service requires an outside grease interceptor. 4. It has been indicated that flooding occurs in this area. Please coordinate with adjacent parcel owners to fix this condition. 5. The dumpster on the property must be set on a pad. The pad will drain to a catch basin and the catch basin needs to be connected to the grease interceptor. Fire Department Comments No comments at this time. Building Department Comments No comments at this time. Your next step is to address the items raised in this letter. Please note that since the underlying permit has not been submitted, these comments are preliminary and may change after the design review application has been submitted. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles ' ci.tukwil..wa.us. Sincerely, Br don J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. Joanna Spencer, Public Works Engineer File (E04 -006) 4 City of Tedcwg tC'1 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED April 27, 2004 Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: AGENT: LOCATION: OWNER OF THE PROPERTY: FILE NUMBERS: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Gramor Development Washington LLC John Graham 13038 Interurban Avenue South Circle K Stores Incorporated E04 -006 (SEPA Application) Construction of a 5,500 square foot commercial building at old gas station site. Administrative Design Review, City of Tukwila Building Permit, City of Tukwila Public Works Permit, City of Tukwila Sign Permit, City of Tukwila These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT The City is accepting public comments on this application. You must submit your comments regarding the State Environmental Policy Act in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on May 11, 2004. If you have questions about this proposal contact Brandon J. Miles, Planner -in- charge of this project at (206) 431 -3684 or by email at bmiles©ci.tukwila.wa.us. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • Please send comments to: City of Tukwila Planning Attn: Brandon J. Miles 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Planning Commission on a project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at (206)- 431 -3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeal if you are interested. DATE OF APPLICATION: April 6, 2004 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 7, 2004 NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: April 27, 2004 Print Map Page King County • Home News ., . Services Vicinty Map "410 co5o i3Ui4 •�� {IG C' . \ `?fJ `\ �• /. .4:7 ��. (ba15 0003000 i lily. ' , \ r \ \ \\/ \\ \ \\ c.. / CO o 3 f/ • 30 AZ- r 15' r X N,' % 4fF0 i5 0203 1411101 \ \ \ (:r,5 f:(0)i r2 King Counlye,,. f,! f� I Parcel Number 0003000110 Address 13038 INTERURBAN AV S Zipcode Taxpayer CIRCLE K STORES INC(PT #U -6 The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." • Co_ mments King County 1 GIS Center 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search • By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Search Page 1 of 1 http: / /www5. metrokc. gov /parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 04/23/2004 IT-0' 1. 5'-0" 'TYPE. 11' S1DEYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER 541 24' 00" - 112.00' • / 1- ONE WAY 140-0" 5'-0' lYPE 11' SIDEYARL LANDSCAPE BUFFER 0 0 0) 0 0 0 uJ 0 a. 0 2 57( 111 TRUCK mUCK LOAOINQ AREA 1 2 -0 1 EITARBUCKS RETAIL 1,500 SO. FT. RETAIL 1,300 S. FT. RETAIL 1,300 S. FT. jr1E:=•111 ••111111111111111111111111111111111••111 IMIS11111111•11111111111111rn111 NMI IMEN ISSIMINII I r IIMPftnefillIll IIMEMEINNI. 11111•1111111111N1111•1111M111111111111•• •1111111M1111111111••1111111111Mill• RETAIL 1,400 SO. FT. 47-0" 13 '4 SITE ACCESS EXISTING ACCESS ROAD 541 24' 00" - 112.00' 0 0 0 6 0. 5'-0" LANDSCAPE STRIP 20.-0* STARBUCKS: 1,500 S. FT. GENERAL— RETAIL' 4,000 S. FT. TOTAL. AREA: 5,500 SO. T. TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 14 STALLS ( 2.5 STALL / 1000 S.F. RETAIL) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 23 STALLS ( 4.5 STALLS / 1,000 S.F. ) SITE ZONING: COMM / LI ( LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. ) ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE P.O.W. 12'-b" 'TYPE 1" FRONTYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER INTERURBAN AVENUE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN: SCALE: 1° 30'70" b' I. HEREBY DECLARE THAT.,,' 2 Notice of Public Hearing Determination 'of Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Non = Significance MitigatedDetermination ofNon Significances Determinato Notice Board Of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice ofAction Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Short Subdivision Agenda Official Notice /Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Notice of,Appl,icat_ion Permit Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 D L\ Project Name: ,rte, V-17)/ Project Number: E G 9 -CO Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHSIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHOREUNE FOIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ,(OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE &ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* (.) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC k.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ()SEATT • SEATTLE TLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT )(AT &T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE () POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING () BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK () HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR () K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE j MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 010 CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM (44 FISHERIES PROGRAM (# WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWWV AC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PTS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\A DM INISTRATI V E \FORMS \CHICLIST. DOC Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Use Avery® TEMPLATE 526371 ` 1- 800-GO -AVERY CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 13510 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 Ci AVERY® 52637A" 0003000032 0003000045 0003000046 HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CYCLES 13001 48TH AVE S ; Seattle, WA 98168 SHELL Attn: Terry McLaughlin) 13138 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 JACK -IN- THE -BOX 13050 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 OCCuP,‘c5 Tv40'aRCeLs O NO"(SEND' [shared by Husky and Harley] 13044 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 0003000108 0003000112 EMERALD INN 13100 48TH AV S Seattle, WA 98168 ,O C C U t9sE S Two PAP CE L X NOT SEND JACK -IN- THE -BOX [double 4800 S 126TH ST Seattle, WA 98168 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 13123 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 76 Store Attn: Stan Peterson 13310 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 0003000106 0003000109 0003000113 0003000116 0004800002 CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 12642 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 wif9Z5 ®AU3A�/ t=1 A113AV-09-008 -1 �� wif9Z5 31V1dW31 �aWV asn wor fuane•nnnnnn �� 6u uud eaJ3 we f Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Use Avery® TEMPLATE 52637'" 1- 800 -GO -AVERY • QAVERY® 5263TM 0004800015 0004800015 Eshelon Telecom, Inc. Optioncare 13035 GATEWAY DRS #119 13035 GATEWAY DRS #131 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 0004800015 0004800015 UPS Otis 13035 GATEWAY DRS #149 13035 GATEWAY DRS #157 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Fireside Thrift Co 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #124 Seattle, WA 98168 CLP Resources Inc 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #112 Seattle, WA 98168 Tukwila Deli 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #100 Seattle, WA 98168 0004800017 0004800017 Hartman Escrow Inc 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #116 Seattle, WA 98168 0004800017 0004800017 Auto Insurance Stores 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #104 Seattle, WA 98168 0004800017 2716000010 GVA Kidder Mathews 12886 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 wi£9Z5 ®A213Ab MAY-09-008 -1 �� NIE9Z5 311/1d1183.1. �aAY ash wontianeniwm 6uiiuud aaij wer Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for 5160® gr, (parcel #:0003000032) CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 13510 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000106) CBIZ PROP. TAX SOLUTIONS 4800 S 126TH ST Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0004800002) CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 12642 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000116) DEMLLC 13044 INTERURBAN AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0004800017) AMB PROPERTY LP 13028 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 • AVERY® Address Labels DENNYS INC 13100 48TH AV S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000045) (parcel #:0003000108) EQUIVA SERVICES LLC 13138 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000112) CBIZ PROP. TAX SOLUTIONS 13050 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:2716000050) AMB PROPERTY LP 12806 GATEWAY DR S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:2716000010) AMB PROPERTY LP 12886 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 TOM RUSSELL L 13001 48TH AVE S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000046) (parcel #:0003000109) DEMLLC 13123 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0003000113) TOSCO CORPORATION 13310 INTERURBAN AV S Seattle, WA 98168 (parcel #:0004800015)., AMB PROPERTY LP 13035 GATEWAY DR S . Seattle, WA 98168 Laser 5160® From: Brandon Miles To: john @gramorWA.com Date: 4/7/04 9:18AM Subject: SEPA Application Interurban Retail Space John, Turns out I will be reviewing the application. I did a quick review of the SEPA checklist and everything looks complete. As I noted at the front counter, we are required to notify both property owners and tenants within 500 feet, so I will need mailing labels for the tenants. I am going to go ahead and deem the application complete and route it to other City Departments, with the understanding that the labels are on the way. As soon as I get those I can distribute a notice of application. On another note, this project will require design review approval prior to issuance of a building permit. I noticed that it was not listed on the SEPA checklist in regards to what other approvals are required. Sincerely, Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila April 7, 2004 Gity Of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION John Graham, Principal Gramor Development Washington LLC 11333 164th St SW, Suite 107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 -8121 Re: Notice of complete application; Interurban Retail Building (E04 -006) Dear Mr. Graham: The Department of Community Development received your SEPA application on April 6, 2004 for the construction of 5,500 square foot office building include associated site development. Based on a review of your application for submittal requirements for Environmental Review, your application is deemed complete as of April 7, 2004. A notice of land use application will be distributed within 14 days of this date. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is also available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. As was noted at the front counter, mailing labels for tenants within 500 feet of the subject site are required. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, you can contact me at (206) 431 -3670 or by email at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, randon J. i es Assistant Planner cc. File (E04 -006) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 City of Tgskwg L ,L • Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMO TO: Development Review Staff FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner RE: SEPA Application E04 -006 DATE: April 7, 2004 John Graham of the Gramor Development Washington LLC has submitted a SEPA application for the construction of 5,600 square foot office building at 13038 Interurban Avenue S (Parcel 0003000110). The site was formerly a gas station which has been demolished. Attached you will find the SEPA checklist, Traffic Generation Questionnaire, Groundwater monitoring report, and ESA screening checklist. Related files include E01 -024 and M01 -093. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 cLf (GRAMOR DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, LLC April 5, 2004 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: SEPA Application 13038 Interurban Ave. Parcel Number: 0003000110 Dear Madams or Sirs: I have enclosed the SEPA application for the above referenced site. You will find the completed Environmental Checklist, a reduced site plan, a large site plan and a check in the amount of $500.00. We had a very good pre - application meeting and trust we are on the right track with our project's design. Please contact me with any questions or comments. We look forward to working with the City on this project. Sincerely, Gramor Development WA, LLC John ' raham, P ncipal Aml Enclosed 1133 164th ST. S.W. / SUITE 107 / LYNNWOOD, WA 98037 -8121 / (425) 742 -5666 fax (425) 742 -5553 E -mail: John @GramorWa.com id (Member or International Council of Shopping Centers CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I J Oi-i-A) 6-P-44-14,4 (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Appli ant or oject Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me 10 ti ON \. G ra A4-ht to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he f sloe signed the same as his /4ser voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of y0o� SEPA_APP -VU 1/23/03 adeic r� NOTARY PUBL��I //C in and for the State of Washington residing at /; - 06 My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: s A�^rr 1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. • 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at / 303 ® I-Aire-re u RFS4A/ .*' . s for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at frV7.7041 (city), LA/4- (state), on nP/2 / t; 6. 2. ¢ c ioht,.tl 4/ x°1'1 (Print //33- /,6 4" ' .4 St. S-1„ l 4702- (Address) A - • 5666. (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me 11 Q executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the s purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF WI e as to me known to be the individual who /Pee voluntary act and deed for the uses and /412 r. l aiat Zoo4 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington /pr o% 1,700 ct residing at My Commission expires on lltite it 0 ,,The ranspo Group •1 0 tall WA Transportation Impact Analysis October 2004 Transportation Specialists Focused on MobilllEy Transportation Impact Analysis INTERURBAN RETAIL TU KWI LA, WA EXPIRES 03/24/ or Prepared for: Gramor Development WA, LLC October 2004 Prepared by The Transpo Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034 -7120 Phone: 425.821.3665 Fax: 425.825.8434 www.thetranspogroup.com © 2004 The Transpo Group Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description 1 Study Approach 1 EXIST1NG AND FUTURE WffHOUT- PROJECT CONDITIONS 4 Roadway Network 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes 4 Planned Improvements 7 Intersection Operations 7 Arterial Operations 8 Traffic Safety 9 Transit Service 10 Non - Motorized Facilities 10 PROJECT IMPACTS 1 1 Trip Generation 11 Trip Distribution and Assignment 11 Traffic Volume Impacts 12 Intersection Operations 12 Arterial Operations 16 Site Access Analysis 17 Non - Motorized Facilities 17 Parking 18 Traffic Safety Impacts 18 Transportation Impact Fees 18 SUMMARY /CONCLUSIONS 19 List of Tables Table 1. Existing and Future Without - Project Intersection LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour 8 Table 2. Existing and Future without - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 9 Table 3. Accident History Summary 9 Table 4. Project Trip Generation: PM Peak Hour 11 Table 5 Project Traffic Volume Impacts- PM Peak Hour 12 Table 6. Future Without - Project and Future with- Project LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 16 Table 7. Future with- Project and Future with - Project Arterial LOS Summ PM Peak Hour 16 Table 8. Driveway LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 17 Table 9. Peak Parking Demand- Weekday Peak Conditions ..19 List of Figures Figure 1. Site Vicinity 2 Figure 2. Site Plan 3 Figure 3. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5 Figure 4. Future Baseline PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 5. Project Trip Distribution 13 Figure 6. Project Trip Assignment 14 Figure 7. Future with Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 15 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Introduction This report sutnmarizes the results of the transportation impact analysis prepared for the proposed retail development located at 13038 Interurban Avenue S in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to identify any potential traffic - related impacts the proposed project would have on the roadway network in the site vicinity and to recommend mitigation measures, as necessary, to mitigate those impacts. Project Description. The proposed project is located mid -block between the intersections of Gateway Drive S and 48th Avenue S on Interurban Avenue S. A site vicinity map is included as Figure 1. The site is currently vacant, as a gas station and convenience market formerly located on -site has been demolished. Access to the site will be consistent with the existing configuration, with full access to existing private driveways located on both the east and west of the site which ultimately access Interurban Avenue S. Full access is currently permitted at the intersections with Interurban Avenue. The project would consist of a single building, which would include an approximately 1,700 square foot (sf) Starbucks Coffee shop with drive -thru window, a 1,365 sf fast -food restaurant without drive -thru (identified as a Quiznos), and approximately 2,650 sf of specialty retail space. Figure 2 includes the site plan used as the basis for this analysis. Full buildout is anticipated by 2005. However, to be consistent with other studies conducted in the City of Tukwila, and as directed by City staff, a 2010 horizon year was used for this study. Study Approach In order to meet the study's objectives, the study area and scope were coordinated in advance with review staff from the City of Tukwila. Four signalized intersections near the project site were selected for analyses during the PM peak hour. In addition, to satisfy City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48- Transportation Concurrency Standards and Impact Fees, four additional signalized intersections were selected for PM peak analysis south of Interstate 5 (1 -5) to allow for the analysis of the Interurban Avenue arterial trait. This arterial unit is defined by the TMC as between I -5 and Interstate 405 (1 -405). The four nearest intersections were identified due to potential impacts based on overall distribution of project trips. The selected arterial unit was selected as it will be impacted by five or more peak hour trips. In addition to intersection and arterial levels of service, the scope of the analysis includes a review of traffic safety and impact fee calculation. The Transpo Group 04209.00 \04209r1 • PAW ' 7 r. - , C.•'.);TFP GO; C 4.,4. ,- , •!,•-••• -- A'7,r,•7..!--!,...„,.-:., - -- .:,,-..!.C.--J Is. 17 'OA "7 p LA' • „ti f'‘ ,:. :, i n T ,' -' ! 1 t ;-• ;--!-? i • s '•'-. S - s , V i i \ ! N NOT TO SCALE .• 1•••?:/■?3!),7 • • • M;;.), if 3 144-11{ )1. • IP; " ,•-: ...,-, , . - -' !' , •-!"0 :1!.:TH — —T•70T! / •• .:' I K. — I i 1 51 1.11iA !LA S iSOfil $T Ti- SIS; sr, ,_Z .• L.1 T.,11) y OU1-\\C.614TE-R • 7.; tr, 4811i ,,..,„ --•\ '...r. .1•,. _, .. . ., . - ...! ..,-, -- i43c,r1 ; ' '-' ',.c. -;! ,, 'T>..14212,D p. ., ,:!.- '7' M.tB i • '?'? •”! 'Y r y;\ i ST ' *, ....■ • — F.:, 'F," - ■-'• . ' g !-I•rif. .; ::. --i"-;;:',-1, --Eh !.:,.. L I) q ..4:.$4.1.t.i 1.,‘ . ..,_, . f, j pi .„,,,,--... gr/Prb,.. 'le 1,,,..Y.A. ...Flo,. • j.1/ ilri2,--e, .,. , ■ " s -14 774 x i '')I , - ` • i',4. p c.;:61 `7, .- nnt • 11 , • . ;;I4)1) • 5 . I . t, 7 4. . I .. , ,')..,...-:, 1 il- •4.7" . ...,,,-- •/) ,....5 s .1E:I'D ST ' •- .' ... . _ 1 4141 Pi - • - . ' 1 c < ... ° • c. 4.4.•; ;• 1;KS Pt — ',:c • ..., , 4.4.4. (4'..• .:;' ••' 5 1 53RD •:'J.. -Cc • \ • 2,444.-:-: •••••?..";' • \ • • .? / • : , . I . • Sin:I :,41--= • : (r21:■.J!-.-11:',- :!:. • 5 1561:ff; ST: F; F. I e"d'•••' ' -CRYSTAZy` IR 50TH Pgiti65 —:.•• --- " - :fsti! t r I > . I ••;- *." 3 1'; • F-.; I . • • . ^ : PAIIK 162Nr:5'•ST 1 if:OZ) • :1 E.:•7•• 1 ..., .01 .4. ".) 4 • : 1.i • `4 I It`.4i}` 7;tsfe' Si ! 1••• ' •• • S°111- f?..+0 '-;,711,411L;1 , 11 ry . PKWY . • !:'2i L'if.45.5r 1 ef -: -:,-t •-': ', • !,;;AIR; CASCA: ,r.r)ruft/4ir rrrt.AZ1 rNTO .14 Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawfid to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All rights reserved. Figure 1 Site Vicinity Interurban Retail Transpo Group MOT TO Sr4LE )IAY XE 516NA6E II' SI EYARD 'APE BUFFER - 544 24' 00' - 112.00' dNE WAY 4? R ,- 1.70o 1r ( 1.000 118E ou¢N C B �� 1084 0 FT_ ( 1,280 (l8F ) 1.202 10'� PIETi. •wel FT. IN IN (1.171 uer) (1.339u'8F) 33 12 ■■ ••••••••••••••ii•MM•i••••••L - - - -J• ■iiii•••••■iiii•UMiieiii\iiii■iii■i■ ••••w••••••f••••••••••iii•••••••••• ■■O Gi7CCC■D;URCGC ;105iOCCiDCCCiiCli.'i7Ou �∎ ■I ■. ■ ____ i' c o %w • c I'"'' °rpew= mom o o _ 1 1 • 0 1 0 0 u a 544 24' 00' - 112.00' 0 0 1 BITE O e ELEG'TFOO TRANBt49910N LINE R.c7.W. Figure 2 Site Plan Interurban Retail INTERURBAN AVENUE r.{. GJ',t4,' !r,'erur:',C Re .9'Lr.i d'i:b yr.' :'i C; ?' 4.% : r 1:.mn (7C7' 4 ',"i" a 5k-0' '1112E 11' SI LANDSCAPE etai The Transpo Group Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Existing and Future Without- Project Conditions This section of the report documents existing conditions in the vicinity of the proposed project, including the surrounding roadway network, PM peak hour traffic volumes, PM peak hour intersection and arterial operations, traffic safety, transit service, and an inventory of adjacent non - motorized facilities. The analysis of existing and future without- project traffic conditions provides a frame of reference when evaluating potential project impacts. Project impacts are measured by comparing the difference in area operations between the with- and without- project scenarios. Roadway Network Existing roadway and non - motorized characteristics for the inunediate study area are described below. Interurban Avenue S is a five -lane roadway that runs southeast - northwest in the project vicinity. Between Interstate 5 and Interstate 405, Interurban Avenue S is designated as a principal arterial, while to the north of I -5 adjacent to the project site, it is designated as a minor arterial. Major intersections along Interurban Avenue S are signalized. Sidewalks exist on the east side of the roadway in the immediate area of the project, and intermittently on the west side. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. S 133.1 Street /Gateway Drive S is designated as a minor arterial to the west of Interurban Avenue S, and a local roadway to the east. It consists of four lanes to the east of Interurban Avenue S (Gateway Drive S), and two lanes to the west. Sidewalks exist on the south side of the roadway, and intermittently on the north side. The posted speed is 30 mph to the west of Interurban Avenue S, and 25 mph to the east. 48th Avenue S is a local roadway located to the south of the project site. 48th Avenue S is a two-lane roadway with sidewalks located on the east side of the street, and intermittently on the west side. A traffic signal controls its intersection with Interurban Avenue S. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. 52.1 Avenue S /56th Avenue S is a two-lane collector arterial to the south of Interurban Avenue S (52nd Avenue S), and a local roadway to the north (56th Avenue S). A traffic signal controls its intersection with Interurban Avenue S. Sidewalks exist on the west side of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Existing and Future Traffic Volumes Existing weekday PM peak hour volumes were collected at the study area intersections in May and June 2004. The existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 3. Based on direction from City Staff, and to remain consistent with other studies conducted in the area, a 1.5- percent annual growth rate was applied to the existing volumes. In addition, City Staff indicated that traffic volumes from the planned Southcenter Mall expansion project, currently undergoing environmental impact review, should be included in the future 2010 traffic volumes. Since the Southcenter Mall expansion has not been approved, the inclusion of this traffic resuhs in a conservative estimate of the future forecast volumes. The combination of the background traffic growth rate and this pipeline project account for future traffic growth in the study area. The resulting future without- project traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 4. The Transpo Group 104209.00\ 042090 (:I) INTERURBAN AVE S I S 133RD ST-GATEWAY 1 INTERURBAN AVE S INTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S SR 599 NB OFF-RAMP I .•• . 1 0 45 ! I 70 95 390 `--"'" N--1, 200 I 850 725 "---1 •`---** 200 -" 220 1 N, N, < 125 65 7 N.,,s5 235 1 235 ) N. ■,..5 140 N") 65 /., ,--■ 510 1 .....--,,, 745 600 235 240 I 65 INTERURBAN AVE S 1-5 SB OFF-RAMP INTERURBAN AVE S I 56TH AVENUE S 860 •,_....- 109515"--# `,.....- 5 5 225 N., ( 545 125 ...N '''( 5 N.. • 10 510 5 ....--, ,..---, 835 60 25 S 133RD ST 44, 58TH AVE S INTERURBAN AVE S N 10 5 1275 N--" 5 65 >-**, r< 5 NOT TO SCAL E 60 )7 ■,,5 10 5 960 60 65 INTERURBAN AVE S 1-405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 70 40 835 "-.1 'N.–, 30 100 .....", r< 155 75 ,e • 245 50 .^..., ,,,-,. 685 360 635 0 INTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 235 )7 < 795 .• °7( 435 180 5 5 280 670 735 210 135 IT( sourvkc-t"5' Figure 3 Existing (2004) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail eet- . :■7 I. It :2 The Transpo Group OINTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST- GATEWAY INTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF -RAMP INTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S 0 50 75 105 430 220 935 800 220 � - 245 I \ < 140 70 7 70 255 N.,\ 260 i-. 560 260 1 255 70 N 820 155 660 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -5 SB OFF -RAMP INTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUES I 245 15 _ 5 I 950 � � 595 1205 � '.< 55 85 "7 NN( 10 565 570 920 I 4' N NOT TO SCALE INTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 10 5 1,405 5 70)� 5 65 >f x`// 10 5 ' r. 1,060 70 75 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1.405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 75 45 935 35 110~ <170 80 >f `,..,5 270 55 ■ 770 435 695 OINTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 305 765 890 '.f ' 915 300 .~ -% 285 215>7 x\475 800 805 230 150 Figure 4 Baseline (2010) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail ")4 tr47 "'3 Irlterurt;:1i • „r.;i 6 . / The Transpo Group Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Planned Improvements The City of Tukwila's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program was reviewed to determine what if any improvement projects were planned at any of the study area intersections. No projects were identified that would directly impact the operations at study intersections. However, one project was identified on Interurban Avenue that will improve general transportation facilities, but.not increase roadway capacity. This project would construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, and landscaping improvements on Interurban Avenue between S 143rd Street and Fort Dent Way. The design phase of the project was scheduled to begin in early 2004, with no completion date identified. No other projects were identified at study intersections or along the studied arterial unit. Intersection Operations . A level of service (LOS) analysis was conducted for the study area intersections for the weekday PM peak hour. The signalized intersections were analyzed using Syndnry 5.0. This software program is based on methodologies presented in the Highutty Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board, 2000 Edition). LOS values range from LOS A, which indicates good operating conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, which indicates extreme congestion and long vehicle delays. LOS is measure in teens of total average intersection delay for signalized intersections, and total vehicle delay by lane group for unsignali7ed intersections. A more detailed explanation of LOS criteria is provided in Appendix A. Table 1 summarizes both existing and future without- project, weekday PM peak hour LOS, for the eight study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. The signal timing information used for the intersection analysis was based on information obtained from the City of Tukwila. Signal timing information from existing conditions was optimized within parameters from the tuning information and held constant for all future operating analyses. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Table 1. Existing and Future Without- Project Intersection LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour Interurban Ave S/ Gateway,Dr S Interurban Ave S/ SR 599: NB Off -Ramp Interurban Ave S/ 48ih Ave S Interurban Ave S/ I- 5:SBOff -Ramp ,Interurban Ave S/ 52od,;Av.e S Interurban Ave S/ 5 8'"' Ave -S. Interurban Ave S/ Fort: Dent.Wy- 1-405 SB Interurban Ave S/• Southcenter Blvd 1. Level of Service 2. Average vehicle delay in seconds 3. Volume to capacity ratio xlstng Condito, c A elayz` 21.2 0.60 0.43 0.58 1:9 ' 0.63 ;1.;0.1 0.51 0.66 10 °Futuremithout;;Project c A B elay 23.0 0.65 7:3 0.48 .16.0. 0.64 0.70 0.56 0.73 26.7: 0.93 E .:71.2 . 1.06` F ..109:7 1.26 As Table 1 shows, the study intersections adjacent to the project site, including Interurban Avenue S /SR 599 NB Off -Ramp, Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S, and Interurban Avenue S /I -5 SB Off -Ramp, all currently operate at LOS C or better, and are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS C or better in 2010. The two intersections on the far southern end of the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment currently have the highest amount of delay of the study intersections. The Interurban Avenue S /Fort Dent Way intersection currently operates at LOS D, but degrades to LOS E in 2010 baseline conditions. The Interurban Avenue S /Southcenter Boulevard intersection currently operates at LOS F, and is anticipated to continue to do so in the future, as no improvements are planned for this intersection by the City. Arterial Operations To satisfy TMC 9.48, an arterial LOS arterial analysis was conducted for the Interurban Avenue S arterial unit. TMC 9.48.070 defines the Interurban Avenue S arterial unit as being between I -5 and I -405, and states that LOS E or better shall be maintained for this arterial. Consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual, arterial level of service is reported in a range from LOS A to LOS F (LOS A indicating free flow and LOS F indicating failing conditions) and is a function of average travel speed (miles per hour) along the arterial. Travel speed takes into account driving time between intersections, and the through movement delay encountered at all signalized intersections along the segment. Table 2 shows the resulting LOS for the Interurban Avenue arterial segment. The LOS is based on an arterial classification of Interurban Avenue S as an arterial Class III facility. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 8 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Table 2. Existing and Future without - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour xtsting conditionsc Interurban Avenue: 20.2 1 -5 to 1 -405 1. Average of northbound and southbound travel speeds 01'0. Future withoutr:Prolect? 18.2 c As shown in Table 2, the Interurban Avenue arterial unit currently operates at LOS C, and is anticipated to continue to operate at LOS C in future baseline conditions. Based on these results, the arterial segment is currently operating, and is anticipated to continue operating within the City's LOS standard by 2010 without the proposed project. Traffic Safety The purpose of this section is to identify any existing safety concerns within the defined study area in order to evaluate the proposed project impacts at these locations. Historical accident records were obtained from the City of Tukwila for the most recent three -year period available (2001 to 2003). Table 3 provides a summary of the accident records at each study intersection. Both the annual average and the accident rate per Million Entering Vehicles (MEV) are summarized. The accident rate, expressed in terms of accidents per MEV, is an important measure since it factors in the observed traffic volumes in the calculations and provides a perspective in relation to the total entering volume (TEV). The average daily traffic (ADT) for the MEV calculation was estimated at each location by multiplying the existing PM peak hour TEV by ten, as PM peak hour traffic volumes typically represent approximately 10- percent of the ADT. Accident data was collected for the four study intersections nearest the site, as they will be impacted most significantly by project trips. The study intersections along Interurban Avenue S to the south of I -5 were analyzed for purposes of determining the arterial LOS only. Table 3. Accident History Summary Intersection Interurban Ave S/ Gateway Dr 5 Ave S/ SR 599 NB Off -Ramp 'Interurban Ave S/ 48'• Ave S Interurban Ave S/ umber of- Accidents 2002 2003 -5 SB Off -Ramp 1. Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles As is shown in Table 2, the intersections of Interurban Avenue S /Gateway Drive S and Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S both have had 15 reported accidents occur between 2001 and 2003. The remaining intersections have had less than ten accidents reported over the last ten years. The four nearest study intersections all show an MEV rate of less than 1.0, which suggests that no unusual safety conditions exist. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 9 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Transit Service . King County Metro transit provides transit service in the study area and near the project site. Metro Routes 124 and 154 provide service along Interurban Avenue S connecting the immediate area around the site with Allentown, Southcenter, Seattle, Kent, Auburn and other regional destinations. Bus stops are located near the intersections of Interurban . Avenue S with 481h Avenue S and Gateway Drive S. Additional Metro routes make scheduled stops at the Interurban Park and Ride lot located to the south of the site near the intersection of Interurban Avenue S/52'(1 Avenue S. Based on existing transit opportunities, the site should be considered reasonably well served and accessible by transit. Non - Motorized Facilities Sidewalks, curb, and gutter are provided along the east side of Interurban Avenue S near the project site, while pedestrian access is restricted on the west side. Sidewalks are also provided along Gateway Drive S, the south side of S 1331 Street, and the east side of 48th Avenue S. Sidewalks exist intermittently elsewhere in the site vicinity. Each of the signalized study area intersections provides pedestrian crosswalks, push buttons, and signal heads to facilitate pedestrian activity. The site is adequately served by the existing non - motorized facilities. The Transpo Group 104209.00\042090 10 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Project Impacts This section documents the potential impacts of the proposed project on the study area roadways and intersections. It includes a summary of the project trip generation, distribution, future traffic volumes, and the potential impacts to traffic volumes, operations, transit, traffic safety, and non - motorized facilities. Trip Generation To determine the extent of the anticipated impact for the proposed project, trip generation was projected for the weekday PM peak hour. The Starbucks trip generation estimate is based on a trip generation study previously conducted specifically for Starbucks stores. This study was conducted by Transportation Engineers Northwest in 2002 at five Puget Sound area Starbucks locations. ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition, was used to determine the total trip generation for the remaining uses. Trip rates identified for the Specialty Retail (ITE Land Use #.810), and Fast -Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru (ITE Land Use # 933) land uses were used. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook does not provide pass -by rates for the Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru land use, so a related use: Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -Thru (ITE Land Use # 934) was utilized. No pass -by rate is provided by ITE for Specialty Retail. To provide a conservative analysis, no pass -by rate was assumed for this portion of the site. In addition, no trip credit has been taken for the previous uses of this site. Table 4 shows the PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. Table 4. Project Trip Generation: PM Peak Hour Starbucks Coffee. with Drive -thru Specialty Retail 'Fast Food without Drive -thru TOTAL Trip Rate er 1` 004 sf)' Total Newi ;Trips 1,700 sf.. 33.89' '58 422 .16 2,650 sf 2.71' 7 1,365 sf ' 26.155 36 • 186 18 7 X61 1. Total trip rate identified in the Starbucks Trip Generation Study, Transportation Engineers Northwest (2002) 2. Pass -by rate of 73% identified in Starbucks Trip Generation Study, Transportation Engineers Northwest (2002) 3. ITE Trip Generation (2004), Land Use #810 (Specialty Retail) 4. No pass -by trips were assumed for the specialty retail portion of the site 5. ITE Trip Generation (2004), Land Use #933 (Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru) 6. Pass -by rate of 50% used; ITE Trip Generation Handbook (2003), Land Use #934 (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -thru) As is shown in Table 4, the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 40 new PM peak hour trips, and 60 pass -by trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of project trips to /from the project site was determined based on current travel patterns in the area and the anticipated market area for the uses identified within the current development plan. Prior to initiating the LOS analysis, the trip distribution was reviewed and approved by City Staff. The net -new project trips, for the PM peak hour, were then assigned to the study intersections based on the City approved trip distribution. The project trip distribution is shown in Figure 5, while the project trip assignment for the PM The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 11 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 peak hour is shown in Figure 6. The resulting future with- project traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 7. Traffic Volume Impacts The traffic volumes associated with the proposed development were compared to the PM peak hour future with- project traffic forecasts to gauge the traffic volume impacts of the proposed project. The results of the traffic volume comparisons are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Project Traffic Volume Impacts- PM Peak Hour Interurban Ave /Gateway Dr S Interurban Ave S /SR ;599 NB:Off -Ramp- interurban Ave S/48:--Ave-S, 'Interurban Ave'S /1- 5.SB Off -Ramp Interurban Ave S/ 52^°.Ave S;• Interurban Ave:S /58f' Ave S .Interurban AveS /Forty Dent.Wy -: 1 =405 SB Interurban Ave S /Southcenter Blvd • 1. Total new project trips entering the intersection 2. Total number of vehicles entering the intersection 21 22 15.. 13 10 2010 Future withProjectZ. 2,661 2;102 1,954 2,370 2,503 2,795 - :3,681 6,141 Project Trip Percetit,Impact:. 0.8% 1.0% 1.0 %: 0.6% 0:5% 0.4% 0.2 %. 0.1% As is shown in Table 5, the proposed project would impact each of the study intersections by 1- percent or less in 2010. The project's greatest impact is anticipated at those intersections adjacent to the site. As traffic volumes typically fluctuate within a range of ten - percent from day to day, the average motorist would not likely notice such impacts. Intersection Operations Intersection levels of service analyses were performed consistent with the methodologies described earlier in this report. Table 6 highlights the results of the LOS analysis conducted at the study area intersections for future with- project conditions. The results of the future baseline analysis have been included in the table for comparison purposes. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 12 N NOT TO SCALE ' LEGEND 0 = STUDY INTERSECTION X = PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT (NEW TRIPS ONLY) Figure 5 Project Trip Distribution/Assignment Interurban Retail Yrurti..t: , 11- The Transpo Group 0 INTERURBAN AVE S I INTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST-GATEWAY I SR 599 NB OFF-RAMP I , • . , : I 4 • < 2 . 8 N. N. . : 2 ‘....5 2 I N".... 12 3 : ' 1 INTERURBAN AVE S 48111 AVENUE S 2 2 7 •••—..1 7 0 INTERURBAN AVE S 1-5 SB OFF-RAMP 7 INTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUE S 1 5 , 1 >N. 1 N'ss. 6 5 N NOT TO SCALE 0 INTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S I 3 , 2 )'■ 2 3 INTERURBAN AVE S I 1-405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 3 N. N3 t 0 INTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD LEGEND X = TOTAL TRIPS (X) = PASS-BY TRIPS Figure 6 Project Trip Assignment - PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail irtertoLzo -D, The Transpo Group or. 0 INTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST-GATEWAY 0 50 434 220 943 220 )N, "r< 247 I 70 ....re N.,5 262 255) 70 567 257 263 ! 71 INTERURBAN AVE Si INTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF-RAMP 48TH AVENUE S 832 I 77 807 107 (140 •••• 155 667 0 INTERURBAN AVE S 1-5 SB OFF-RAMP 957 246 < 595 N 571 INTERURBAN AVE S I 55TH AVENUE S 15 1.210 136 86)1 5 70 5 5 "r<5 N NOT TO SCALE (-) SITE 0 INTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 10 5 1,408 5 • 72 ›N 5 67 >7 •,.( 10 5 rm., 1,063 70 75 0 INTERURBAN AVE S 1-405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 75 45 938 "---'e `....-, 35 110 ....‘, .,...‹ 170 80 >7 s.„5 270 55 ..---.„ ,— 773 435 695 0 INTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 306 766 891 s!--, 915 301 ....***• .-"< 285 216 >7 N.,5 475 800 806 230 150 23 42 JL 31 904 Shared Driveway Volumes* 14 807 JL. 86 860 *NOTE: VOLUMES INCLUDE EXISTING TRAFFIC THAT SHARE THE DRIVEWAYS 41 -6-- 734 Figure 7 Future (2010) With-Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail t"04.;:1219 Ir.'erurt ••• ,•1 • "...7 ';■:' 1.: IL The Transpo Group Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Table 6. Future Without- Project and Future with- Project LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour Interurban Ave S/ Gateway Dr S Interurban Ave S/ SR 599 NB Off -Ramp Interurban Ave S/ 48'" Ave S." Interurban Ave S/ 1 -5 SB Off -Ranip Interurban Ave S/ .52'd Ave S Interurban,Ave S/ S8'" Ave S Interurban Ave S/ Fort Dent Wy- 1 -405 SB - Interurban Ave S/ Southcenter Blvd 1. Level of Service 2. Average vehicle delay in seconds 3. Volume to capacity ratio l 0 Future itfiout Project rK delay= 0?;Future with -P, rojec ela 23:0 :. ': 0.65 C 23.1 0.66 7:3 `0.48 A 7.3 ` 0.48 16:0 ' 0.64 B 16.2 0.64 °"26:7;;; 0.70 C 26.7' - 0.71 0.56 A .6.0._.. 0.56 0.73 B 11.4 0.73 E 71.2 1.06 E 71.6 1.06 F 109.7 1.26 110.0 1 .26 As is shown in Table 6, all of the study intersections are anticipated to operate under the with- project scenario at the same LOS as in baseline conditions. The average vehicle delay at each intersection increases by less than one second with the addition of project traffic. The study intersections nearest the site continue to operate at LOS C or better in 2010 future with- project conditions. Arterial Operations Arterial segment level of service analysis was performed consistent with the methodologies described earlier in this report. Table 7 shows the results of the LOS analysis conducted for the Interurban Avenue arterial segment for future (2010) with- project conditions. The results of the future baseline (2010) analysis have been included in the table for comparison purposes. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. Table 7. Future with - Project and Future with- Project Arterial LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour `Interurban Avenue:' :1 -5. to 1= 405 1. Average of northbound and southbound travel speeds Future ":without-Project =Conditions'' Speed' 'LOS uture w'ith= Prolect:Conditions r° Speed' As is shown in Table 7, the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment would continue to operate at LOS C with the addition of project traffic, decreasing in average speed by one tenth (mph). Based on these results, the proposed project meets the City's concurrency standard as the affected arterial segment is anticipated to operate at LOS E or better. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 16 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Site Access Analysis Unsignalized driveway LOS analyses were conducted using Syrtdno 5.0, which is based on 2000 HCM unsignalized intersection methodologies. Traffic volumes were developed at the site access locations based on turning movement counts conducted in June 2004 at the two shared private driveways that connect with 1 nterurban Avenue S. The total project trips (new plus pass -by), were assigned to the existing driveway volumes generated by the other neighboring uses that share these driveways. The two-way center left -turn lane on Interurban Avenue S provides a refuge by which vehicles making a westbound left turn from either driveway can use in order to complete the turn in two stages depending on the timing of gaps in traffic on Interurban Avenue S. This two-stage gap process is possible without conflict from other turns as the driveways do not have an opposing approach to the west. The two-stage gap use was assumed in the reported driveway LOS analysis. The driveway LOS results are presented in Table 8. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. Table 8. Driveway LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour SharedSi teDriveway, Interurban Avenue S/ North Shared Site Driveway. Interurban Avenue S/ South Shared Site Driveway. 1. Level of Service 2. Average delay per vehicle in seconds 3. Worst Movement at the intersection (highest amount of delay) c c 22.7 22.4 orst, Mvmt3 Westbound Left Turn. Westbound Left Turn ' As shown in Table 8, the results of the analysis indicate that both driveways would likely operate at LOS C in future with- project conditions. This analysis focuses on the PM peak hour which generally represents the highest outbound volumes for uses adjacent. Non - Motorized Facilities Pedestrian facilities currently exist in the area and adjacent to the site which will support the connection of the site to available transit service, both existing and future. These facilities include a sidewalk along the east side of Interurban Avenue S, which connects to other sidewalks and leads to designated transit stops in the area. Parking As currently proposed, the project will provide 58 parking stalls in an on -site, paved surface parking lot. City of Tukwila Parking Code requires 58 stalls for this site, which is met by the proposed supply. A parking demand analysis was also completed to determine the adequacy of the parking supply. Using Parking Generation (ITE, 2nd Edition), weekday peak parking generation rates were developed for the site. For the Starbucks portion of the site, the average peak parking rate for ITE land use # 836 (Fast Food with Drive -In Window) was used, while ITE land use . # 837 (Fast Food Without Drive -In Window) was used for the Quiznos portion of the site. The peak parking demand for the balance of the development was determined using ITE land use # 820 (Shopping Center), as no parking rates are provided for ITE land use # 810 (Specialty Retail). The Shopping Center land use classification is the closest related land -use to Specialty Retail. Table 9 shows the results of the parking demand analysis. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 17 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Table 9. Peak Parking Demand: Weekday Peak Conditions • Starbucks Coffee with Drive -thru Specialty Retail (Shopping Center)' Fast Food "without Drive -thru 1',700 sf 2,650 sf 1,365 sf ak,Parkjng Rate (per 1,000 sfl `f 9.95' 3.23' 11.68' Total Peak Demand Total Parking Supply 58 • Parking.Surplus +16 1. Average Peak Rate; Parking Generation (ITE, 2' Edition), Land Use #836 (Fast Food with Drive -In Window) 2. Average Peak Rate; Parking Generation (ITE, 2' Edition), Land Use #820 (Shopping Center); Note: no Specialty Retail parking rates are provided by ITE. 3. Average Peak Rate: Parking Generation (ITE, 2' Edition), Land Use #837 (Fast Food without Drive -in Window) 17 9 16 42 As is shown in Table 9, the proposed project's practical parking capacity would provide a surplus of ten parking stalls during the peak weekday period, adequately accommodating the peak parking demand. Traffic Safety Impacts Given the minimal level of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed project, combined with the operational impacts summarized previously for the study area intersections, this project is not likely to adversely impact the operational safety of the roadways or intersections within the defined study area. The previous safety analysis included in this report identified no existing safety deficiencies to which the project would impact. Transportation Impact Fees The City of Tukwila has established transportation nnpact fees in TMC 9.48.140. The current transportation impact fee schedule identifies ten improvement projects throughout the city. Developments that generate trips that impact any one of these projects by five or more trips must pay a fee per trip. Based on the project trip distribution and assignment noted in Figures 5 and 6 and the anticipated local nature of project trips, only one of the projects currently identified in the impact fee schedule is impacted by five or more project trips. The Interurban Bridge widening project will widen the bridge to allow dual left turn lanes. The per trip fee for this improvement project is $240, equating to a total nnpact fee for this project of approximately $1,440. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00 \04209r1 18 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA October 2004 Summary /Conclusions The proposed project would consist of a single 5,700 -sf (approximate) retail building to be located on the east side of Interurban Avenue S between the intersections of Interurban Avenue S /Gateway Drive S and Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S. The retail building will include approximately 1,700 sf of space for a Starbucks Coffee shop with drive -thru window, approximately 1,365 sf for a fast food restaurant without drive -thru, and 2,650 sf of specialty retail space. Access to the site is proposed via two existing shared private driveways located on the east and west sides of the site. The site is currently vacant, though it formerly was the site of a gas station and convenience market. No trip credit has been taken, assuring a conservative analysis and estimate of potential project impacts. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 100 total trips during the PM peak hour, with approximately 40 considered new to the area, and 60 considered pass -by trips. The scope of the analysis was coordinated with City of Tukwila Staff. The following summarizes the key points of the analysis. • Future baseline analyses incorporated general increases in background growth. The results of the analysis indicated that the signalized off -site study intersections adjacent to the site on Interurban Avenue S are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour, while the intersections on the far southern end of the arterial segment would operate at LOS E or F. However, the Interurban Avenue arterial segment is expected to operate at LOS C overall during the PM peak hour. • Based on the future baseline traffic volumes and the project trip assignment, the proposed project is expected to increase traffic volumes by 1 percent or less in the PM peak hour.. • The with- project levels of service indicate that the off -site signalized study intersections are expected to operate at the same LOS as in baseline conditions. Delay at the off -site study intersections are anticipated to either remain the same or increase by less than one second per average vehicle. The LOS for the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment is projected to operate at LOS C in the future under with - project conditions, meeting the City's LOS E standard. • Analyses of the site access points indicate that the two shared private access driveways would operate at LOS C in the future under with- project conditions. • Overall traffic volumes are expected to increase by 1- percent or less during the PM peak period as a result of the project, thus not significantly increasing traffic volumes within the area beyond what the future transportation network can accommodate. This minor increase in traffic volumes is not anticipated to affect overall safety within the study area. • The proposed project's parking supply of 58 stalls adequately accommodates the peak parking demand projected for the site. • No transportation mitigation, above the payment of the standard Transportation Impact Fees previously noted, has been identified for this project. The Transpo Group ► 04209.00 \04209r1 19 Appendix A: Highz uy GipacityManual (2000): Level of Service Criteria and Definitions Highway Capacity Man2Ial, 2000 Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in tenns of the average total vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. Vehicle delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time. Specifically, LOS criteria are stated in terms of average delay per vehicle during a specified time period (for example, the PM peak hour). Vehicle delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing (i.e., progression of movements through the intersection), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity. Table A -1 shows LOS criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the 1- liglrcwy Capacity Mamai (Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209, 2000). Table 1. Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections -5.10 10. 20- :020; 35 >35, 55 ; >'55 -80 80 eneral DescriptionrX Signalized Intersection Free Flow:';> Stable Flow (slight delays) Stable flow; (acceptabledelays) Approaching unstable flow. (tolerable delay,. occasionally ,wait through more than:onesignal cycle before proceeding). Unstable flow (intolerable delay) Forced flow (jammed) Unsignalized intersection LOS criteria can be further reduced into two intersection types: all-way stop - controlled and two-way stop - controlled. All -way, stop - controlled intersection LOS is expressed in terms of the average vehicle delay of all of the movements, much like that of a signalized intersection. Two -way, stop - controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average vehicle delay of an individual movement(s). This is because the performance of a two-way, stop - controlled intersection is more closely reflected in terms of its individual movements, rather than its performance overall. For this reason, LOS for a two-way, stop - controlled intersection is defined in terms of its individual movements. With this in mind, total average vehicle delay (i.e., average delay of all movements) for a two-way, stop - controlled intersection should be viewed with discretion. Table A -2 shows LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections (both all-way and two- way, stop - controlled). Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total.Delayeclveh); 0 -10 >10 -15 >1 5 - 25 >25 - 35 >35 - 50 >50 Appendix B Level of Service Worksheets 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Lane Group° : : -;; . _ EBT;TEBR 4- 4\ t WBT . :NBC' NBT7 SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 258 Queue Length 50th (ft) 66 103 Queue Length 95th (ft) 112 159 Internal Link Dist (ft) 798 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty, (veh) 511 264 818 429 127 71 64 85 #182 #115 81 137 1251 184 1287 175 31% 48% 86 4, SBR::` 220 86 163 50 32% 53% 91 InterSectioriSiimmary..' :•: $5.:1a :. A'.� ' •. -, -. � -t:�' ;, •_ #. 95th percentile.volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour sy6 Page 1 THETRALVL3 -FF51 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S Movement _'. • BBL': .EBT ' EBR WBL. WBT WBR "NBL' NBT Lane Configurations 4 r ,gyp II) fA Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0. 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0 95 0 97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0 99 1 00 0 95 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0 98 0 95 1 00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1782 1553 3094909889 408 3303 3245 Flt Permitted 0.98 1.00 0.98 0 95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1782 1553 3408 3303 3245 Volume (vph) 65 65 235 220 200 45 240 510 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0 91 0 91 Adj. Flow (vph) 71 71 258 242 220 49 264 560 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 142 258 0 511 0 264 818 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 6% 6% Turn Type Split pm +ov Split Prot Protected Phases 4 4 5 8 8 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green. G (s) 9.9 17 9 14 0 8.0 39 5 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 20 6 15.7 9.0 40 7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.26 0 20 0 11 0 51 Clearance Time (s) 5.7 5 0 5.7 5.0 5.2 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 258 478 669 372 1651 v/s Ratio Prot 0 08 c0.06 c0 15 c0 08 c0 25 Ws Ratio Perm 0 11 We Ratio 0.55 054 076 071 050 Uniform Delay, dl 31.8 2884 5 6 30 4 34.2 12.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1 00 1 00 0.71 0 34 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 1 2 . 5 2 5.9 1 0 Delay (s) 34.3 26 8 35 6 30.1 5.5 Level of Service C C D C A Approach Delay (s) 29.5 35 6 11 5 Approach LOS C D B Intersection Summary Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail v 1 r NBR SBL-. SST- -'SBR fr r 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 3374 1509 1.00 1.00 3374 1509 235 0 390 200 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 258 0 429 220 0 0 429 220 6% 7% 7% 6 26.5 27.7 0.35 5.2 3.0 1168 0.13 0.37 19.6 1.00 0.9 20.5 C 21.2 C 7% Perm 6 26.5 27.7 0.35 5.2 3.0 522 0.15 0.42 20.0 1.00 2.5 22.5 C HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 21.2 0 60 80.0 56.1% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 12.0 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 2 2: SR 599 NB Off -Ramp & Interurban Avenue S Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Lane7Grdup.. ". z.- ; T EBL7 Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 Queue Length 50th (ft) 112 Queue Length 95th (ft) 169 Internal Link Dist (ft) 329 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time (% ) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % 15% Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 Intersedtion'Surnmaiy,. T "'EBR'gNBT:"SBT. 66 760 867 28 22 66 55 38 87 519 184 150 M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 2: SR 599 NB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Movement .. '7" EBL. EBR Lane Configurations r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1641 1468 Flt Permitted 0.95 1 00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1641 1468 Volume (vph) 235 65 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0 98 Adj. Flow (vph) 240 66 Lane Group Flow (vph) 240 66 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 10% 10% Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15 7 15.7 Effective Green, g (s) 16 7 16.7 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 343 306 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0 04 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.22 Uniform Delay, dl 29 3 26.2 Progression Factor . 1.00 1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.1 0 4 Delay (s) 35.5 26.6 Level of Service 0 C Approach Delay (s) 33.5 Approach LOS C Intersectidn Summary \ NBL' NBT tt 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3505 1.00 3505 0 745 0 98 0.98 0 760 0 760 3% 3% -' SBT'"'SBR tf 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1 00 3539 1 00 3539 850 0 0.98 0.98 867 0 867 0 2% 2% 2 6 54.2 55.3 0.69 5.1 3.0 2423 0 22 0.31 4.9 0.20 0.3 1.3 A 1.3 A 54.2 55.3 0 69 5.1 3.0 2446 c0 24 0.35 5.1 0 57 0.4 3.2 A 3.2 A HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 7,2 0.43 80.0 43 9% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service A 8.0 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 3 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 4 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail k 1 `• Lane -GrotS C'- ':? -'WBL WBR • NBT... SBL. SB? •'" -" .. 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S Movement . ; W='' -"CNBL :7NBR " SBI'- "7SBT' Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Lane Group Flow (vph) 132 100 779 74 763 Lane Configurations ) fI* ' ?f Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 47 77 38 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 87 97 #87 100 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4.0 4 0 4 0 4.0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1167 120 519 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95 50th Up Block Time ( %) 3% Frt 1.00 0.85 0 97 1.00 1.00 95th Up Block Time ( %) 5% Flt Protected 0 95 1.00 1 00 0.95 1.00 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 1482 3439 1736 3471 50th Bay Block Time % 23% 2% Flt Permitted 0 95 1.00 1 00 0 95 1.00 95th Bay Block Time % 47% 39% Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 1482 3439 1736 3471 Queuing Penalty (veh) 35 51 17 Volume (vph) 125 95 600 140 70 725 Peak -hour factor PHF 0 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 132 100 632 147 74 763 Lane Group Flow (vph) 132 100 779 0 74 763 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 9% 9% 2% 2% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm Prot Protected Phases 3 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green. G (s) 11 6 11.6 31.6 4 8 39.4 Effective Green, g (s) 11 6 11.6 316 4 8 40.4 Firl rsection Summary • # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. - M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.40 0 06 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 4 0 4.0 4 0 4 0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3.0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 240 215 1358 104 1753 v/s Ratio Prot c0 08 c0 23 c0.04 0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 v/c Ratio 0 55 0.47 0 57 Uniform Delay. di 31 8 31.4 18 9 Progression Factor 1 00 1.00 0.60 Incremental Delay. d2 2 7 1.6 1 5 Delay (s) • 34.5 32.9 12.9 Level of Service C C B Approach Delay (s) 33.8 12 9 Approach LOS C B Intersection,Summary • HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0 71 0.44 369 126 0.70 0.63 197 08 45 6 8.7 D A 11 9 B 15 1 HCM Level of Service 0.58 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 44.5 %' , ICU Level of Service • 32.0 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 6 4: 1 -5 SB Off -Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail ! t t LanetGrcu i 1,77 - NBL WBR KIST Lane Group Flow (vph) 592 245 554 935 Queue Length 50th (ft) 148 . ' 117 104 101 Queue Length 95th (ft) #238 #233 162 87 Internal Link Dist (ft) 540 918 120 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) 4% Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time Queuing Penalty (veh) I'ntergaioti Summary ; ; • # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. SBT., M:\04104209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 7 4: 1 -5 SB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Movement _ , "VVBL t WBR: NBT''.NBR 'SBL ' 'SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3367 Flt Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 3367 Volume (vph) 545 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 592 Lane Group Flow (vph) 592 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 4% Turn Type Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 Effective Green, g (s) 16 0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.2 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0 88 Uniform Delay, dl 31.1 Progression Factor 1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.6 Delay (s) 43.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 43.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summat3 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group ++ TT 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1 00 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1553 3539 3471 1 00 1 00 1.00 1553 3539 3471 225 .510 0 0 860 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 245 554 0 0 935 245 554 0 0 935 4% 2% 2% 4% 4% Perm 4 14.8 16.0 0.20 5.2 3.0 311 0 16 0.79 30.4 1.00 12.4 42 8 D 2 31.6 31.6 0 40 4.0 3.0 1398 0 16 0.40 17.4 1.00 0.8 18.2 B 18.2 B 6 39.4 40.4 0.50 5.0 3.0 1753 c0.27 0.53 13.4 0.28 1.1 4.8 A 4.8 A 21.9 0 63 80.0 49.4% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 23.6 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 8 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Interurban Retail - 7 `- 1 t j EB7?"` EB1r7INBT 7NBL17tJBTi`4.SBSBTz: Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 66 15 27 929 16 1340 Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 14 3 2 52 1 88 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 41 15 15 103 8 174 Internal Link Dist (ft) ' 523 975 1512 918 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % 17% Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 Intersection Summary . ` _:' 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) J ! `- t `. 1 • Movement ":7 %":'' `EBL =.EBT "EBR':•WBL7IWB7 <,WBR'' ' NBC* N87, ,tJ8R SBL! ''S87 .'SBR Lane Configurations 4 l 4+ ) f•j+ ) fA Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt Flt Protected 1.00 0 85 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0 95 1 00 0.98 0.95 1736 1 3465 00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1796 1150990 599 17 1787 3519 Flt Permitted 0 73 1 00 0.91 67 0.17 1 00 0.29 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1367 1599 1630 308 3465 542 3519 Volume (vph) 80 5 60 '5 5 5 25 835 10 15 1095 125 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0 91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 88 5 66 5 5 5 27 918 11 16 1203 137 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 93 66 0 15 0 27 929 0 16 1340 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 9 6 9.6 44 6 44.6 44.6 44.6 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 10 6 10.6 46 0 46.0 46.0 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 16 0 .16 0.16 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5 0 5.0 5 4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extens on (s) 3.0 3 0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 262 267 219 2467 386 2506 v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm c0 07 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.03 v/c Ratio 0 42 0.25 0.06 0.12 0 38 0.04 0.53 Uniform Delay, dl 24.2 23 5 22.8 2 9 3.7 2.8 4.3 Progression Factor. 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay. d2 1.2 0 5 0.1 0 3 0.1 0.0 0.2 Delay (s) 25.5 24.1 22.9 3 2 3.8 2.8 4.5 Level of Service C C C A A A A Approach Delay (s) 24 9 22.9 3.7 4.5 Approach LOS C C A A IntersectionSummary. ` ! 1 t.i pia .'s n HCM Average Control Delay 5 6 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.6 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.1% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 M:104 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 9 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3-FF51 Page 10 Existing- PM Peak Hour 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail --10 4- `\ t j EBR- WBTT''NBC. `"NBT $el . SBT .. Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 67 18 73 1090 11 1506 Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 22 6 26 67 4 206 Queue Length 95th (ft) 55 52 20 #66 194 17 328 Internal Link Dist (ft) 681 222 1266 1354 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time (%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersectior Summa 17 71: r' t 77 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. M: \04 \04209 Interurban RetaillLOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail __.-.. _� Movement '� �� .?. EBL4; E8T -MR VJBL :. W.BT'' WBR `•!NBL'''NBT ' NBR" .SBI', "SBT > SBR Lane Configurations 4 (r 4. ' +I ) ft. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade ( %) -1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.96 1,00 1.00 1,00 0.99 Flt Protected 0 96 1 00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1790 1591 1750 1770 3534 1736 3446 Fit Permitted 0 73 1 00 0.90 0.95 1 00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1368 1591 1605 1770 3534 1736 3446 Volume (vph) 60 5 60 5 5 5 65 960 10 10 1275 65 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 67 6 67 6 6 6 73 1079 11 11 1433 73 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 73 67 0 18 0 73 1090 0 11 1506 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 8 9 8.9 8.9 4.7 52 6 1.1 49.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.1 10.1 10.1 5.2 53.4 1.6 49.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.69 0.02 0.65 Clearance Time (s) 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.5 4.8 4.5 4.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 179 208 210 119 2448 36 2226 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0 31 0 01 c0.44 v/s Ratio Perm c0 05 0.04 0.01 v/c Ratio 0 41 0.32 0.09 0.61 0 45 0 31 0.68 Uniform Delay. d1 30 8 30 4 29.4 35.0 5.3 37.2 8.6 Progression Factor 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1 5 0.9 0.2 9 0 0 1 4.8 0.8 Delay (s) 32 3 31 3 29.6 44 0 5 4 42.0 9.4 Level of Service C C C 0 A 0 A Approach Delay (s) 31 8 29.6 7 8 9.6 Approach LOS C C A A 'Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 10.1 HCM Level of Service B 0.66 77.1 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 66.8% ICU Level of Service B M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 'Page 11 Page 12 THETRALVL3 -FF51 7: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail • ! '~ `\ 1 \• Lane GrouW 77ZZ' 1:777- 'EBT""' EBR ; WBL` WBT' :`NBL TNBT :'SBL' Lane Group Flow (vph) 137 396 170 77 698 1022 77 153 65 329 332 68 #269 119 m246 m231 124 296 363 1% Queue Length 50th (ft) 100 ' 358 Queue Length 95th (ft) 162 #568 Internal Link Dist (ft) 392 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up BlockTime'( %) 33% Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) 250 14% 13% 2% 1% 42 45 Intersection Summary 175 -SBT- 918 448 #584 324 18% 31% 42% 49% • 261 J 110 84 143 200 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour sy6 Page 13 THETRALVL3 -FF51 7: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail 1 7 ! 4- t 4 T P \► 1 r Movement,: ELK: 77E817 EBR ' WBL. WBTr"WBR ' NBL`.''NBT NBR' SBL SBT `= 'SBR Lane Configurations 4 r +5 p VI +It ''i fp r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 0.97 0 95 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0 91 1.00 0 96 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.97 1.00 0 95 1 00 0.95 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1774 1553 1787 1720 3433 3399 1752 3357 1427 Flt Permitted 0.97 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1774 1553 1787 1720 3433 3399 1752 3357 1427 Volume (vph) 75 50 360 155 30 40 635 685 245 70 835 100 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 82 55 396 170 33 44 698 753 269 77 918 110 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 137 396 170 77 0 698 1022 0 77 918 110 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Turn Type Split Perm Split Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 6 2 2 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 35 9 35 9 15.3 15.3 29.0 58.9 9.9 40.8 40.8 Effective Green, g (s) 36 9 36 9 16 3 16.3 29.0 59.9 10.9 41,8 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 26 0.26 0.12 0.12 0.21 0 43 0.08 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5 0 5 0 5 0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3 0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph). 468 409 208 200 711 1454 136 1002 426 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0 10 0 04 c0.20 0 30 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 v/c Ratio 0 29 0.97 0.82 0.38 0.98 0.70 0.57 0.92 Uniform Delay, dl 41 1 51.0 60 a 57.2 55.2 32.8 62.3 47.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0 62 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0 3 35.8 21 4 1.2 6.6 0.3 5.3 14.2 Delay (s) 41 5 86.8 81.8 58.4 48.5 20.6 67,6 61.7 Level of Service D F F E D C E E Approach Delay (s) 75 1 74.5 - 32.0 59.8 Approach LOS E E C E Intersection:Summry. 0.08 0.26 37.3 1.00 1.5 38.8 D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 49.8 0.93 140.0 72,5% HCM Level of Service D Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 14 Existing- PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd. (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail r ` 4\ t `► 1 -' Lane G ro u p 7 r : ' .7..r . 7EBL7'"EBT :EBR,"" WBL : WBT.'.WBR.0 , N6E NBT ''SBL °!SBI SBRT' ;'.') Lane Group Flow (vph) 191 713 223 277 824 745 144 1245 298 Queue Length 50th (ft) -218 313 85 246 322 -852 130 -732 :149 Queue Length 95th (ft) #376 387 127 #896 393 #1100 #238 #872 m163 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 375 527 50th Up Block Time ( %) 44% 28% 95th Up Block Time ( %) 9% 4% 54% . 40% Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 250 100 150 50th Bay Block Time % 34% 38% 3% 15% 58% 58% 95th Bay Block Time % 63% 45% 35% 24% 61% 37% 61% Queuing Penalty (veh) 173 79 77 53 244 115 85 Intersection Summary,'. 16% 100 27% 29% 143 846 250 303 0 m338 m0 155 15% 17% 24% 26% 206 - Volume exceeds capacity; queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles # ' 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile: queue is metered by upstream signal. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 15 Existing- PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd. (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail r~ & o t t `- 1 Movem3ht :; EBL Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green. G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay. d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ntersection,Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group ZEBT. EBR r:WBL °" WBT WBR =:;,NBL NBT- NBR : SBL -:;SBT :SBR f? r fr r ff r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 , 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0 95 1 00 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0 97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 85 1.00 1 00 0 85 1.00 0.94 1 00 1.00 0.85 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1.00 1 00 0.95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3309 3367 3471 1553 0.95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0.95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3309 3367 3471 1553 180 670 210 260 775 700 135 735 435 280 795 235 0 94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0.94 191 713 223 277 824 745 144 782 463 298 846 250 191 713 223 277 824 745 144 1245 0 298 846 250 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% Prot pm +ov Prot Perm Prot Prot Free 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 4 8 Free 11.0 38.1 51 5 23 9 51.0 51 0 13.4 42.6 15.4 44.6 140.0 12.0 39.1 53.5 24.9 52.0 52 0 14 4 43 6 16.4 45.6 140.0 0.09 0.28 0.38 0 18 0 37 0 37 0 10 0.31 0 12 0 33 1.00 5.0 5.0 5 0 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 5.0 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0 30 30 30 30 3.0 152 988 605 315 1314 588 180 1031 394 1131 1553 c0 11 0 20 0.04 0 16 0 23 0 08 c0.38 c0 09 0 24 0 10 c0 47 c0.16 126 0.72 037 088 0.63 127 080 1.21 076 075 0.16 64.0 45.5 31 1 56.1 36.1 44 0 61 4 48 2 59 9 42.1 0.0 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 0 94 0 48 1.00 157.9 2.6 04 231 0.9 1333 219 102.6 33 1.8 0.1 221.9 48.2 31 5 79 2 37.0 177 3 83 3 150 8 59 8 22.0 0.1 F D C E D F F F E C A 74.3 99.9 143.8 26.2 77 .7 r5Zi E F F C 87 6 HCM Level of Service 1.14 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 103.2% ICU Level of Service F M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 16 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S Interurban Retail 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S -+ 1 t Lane.Group�''rs ?:¢' •'EBTti'.7EBR °V1/ST NEIL-744U: 7SBT' Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 280 566 286 901 Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 113 143 77 70 Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 171 #225 #124 90 Internal Link Dist (ft) 798 1251 184 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 175 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection 'S -u r ny 473 97 153 1287 35% 51% 104 J .EBR 71,77 242 97 183 50 37% 56% 109 # 95th percentile volume exceeds.capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. M:104104209 Interurban Retai#LOS12010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 1 Interurban Retail ♦ ♦ ~ \ t /' `► ♦ 4/ Mdvernent7it EBR-; WBL° r 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4 0 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1782 1553 0 98 1.00 1782 1553 70 70 255 245 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 77 77 280 269 0 154 280 0 4% 4% 4% 2% Split pm +ov Split 4 4 5 8 4 11.8 19 8 13.5 22 5 0 17 0.28 5.7 5.0 30 30 301 514 0 09 c0.06 0.12 0 51 0.54 30 3 24.4 1 00 1.00 15 1.2 31 7 25 6 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases.. Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS nfersect'ion.Summaiy .. C C • 27.8 C 'WBT' 'WBR'7NBL NBT. :NBR` SBL SBT47 SBR 41. VI ft• ++ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 0.97 0 95 0.95 0.99 1.00 0 95 1.00 0,98 0.95 1.00 1.00 3407 3303 3244 3374 0 98 0.95 1 00 1.00 3407 3303 3244 3374 220 50 260 560 260 0 430 091 0.91 091 091 0.91 0.91 0.91 242 55 286 615 286 0 473 566 0 286 901 0 0 473 2% 2% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% Prot 8 5 2 6 14,3 16.0 0.20 5.7 3.0 681 c0 17 0 83 30.7 1 00 85 39 2 D 39 2 D 8.0 9.0 011 5.0 3.0 372 c0 09 37.3 38.5 0 48 5.2 30 1561 c0 28 077 058 34.5 14 9 0 68 0 36 8.9 1 5 32.5 6 9 C A • 13.0 B 24.3 25.5 0.32 5.2 3.0 1075 0.14 0.44 21.6 1.00 1.3 22.9 C 23.9 C 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1509 1.00 1509 220 0.91 242 242 7% Perm 6 24.3 25.5 0.32 5.2 3.0 481 0.16 0.50 22.1 1.00 3.7 25.8 C HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 23.0 0.65 80.0 60 7% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 B M:104 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 2 2: SR 599 NB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S i 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail La`ne'Group • 3 •a° � _ EBIrTEBRIfPNBT SBT1,, % = Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 71 837 954 Queue Length 50th (ft) 121 29 31 73 Queue Length 95th (ft) 179 57 42 m111 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 329 519 184 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) 1% Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % 18% Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 Inte[seCttoh Summa `` • m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 3 2: SR 599 NB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail 1 t 1 4, "" Mdvement , , ' .; ,r ;s =" EBC "EBR . tJBL'7.NBT"-SBT7 SBR u'' °• Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util :Factor 1 00 Frt 1 00 Flt Protected 0 95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1641 Flt Permitted 0 95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1641 Volume (vph) - 255 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0 98 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 10% Turn Type Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases Actuated Green. G (s) 16.7 Effective Green. g (s) 17.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 363 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0 72 Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 Delay (s) 35.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 33.4 Approach LOS C Infergedtion Summary 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1 00 1468 1 00 1468 70 0 98 71 71 10% Perm 1900 1900 40 0 95 1 00 1 00 3505 1.00 3505 0 820 0.98 0 98 0 837 0 837 3% 3% 1900 1900 40 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 935 0 0.98 0.98 954 0 954 0 2% 2% 4 16.7 17.7 0 22 5.0 3.0 325 0 05 0 22 25.5 1.00 0.3 25.8 C 2 6 53 2 54 3 0.68 51 30 2379 0 24 0 35 54 0.20 03 1.4 A 14 A 53 2 54 3 0.68 51 30 2402 c0 27 0.40 57 0 55 04 3.5 A 3.5 A HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 7.3 0.48 80.0 47.5% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service A 8.0 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 4 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S Interurban Retail trarVG7OriP7 , .34't TW(3L-W BR77-N1Bri.. tt31: 7SB-Ittt7F,-.171: Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 111 858 79 842 Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 52 84 39 83 Queue Length 95th (ft) 118 94 m102 #93 127 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1167 120 519 50th Up Block Time (%) 4% 95th Up Block Time (%) 5% Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50th Bay Block Time % 29% 10% 95th Bay Block Time % 49% 41% Queuing Penalty (veh) 43 74 21 Intersection'Summair •• :7 # 95th percentile volume.exceeds capacity, queue may be ionger. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. M:\04\04209 Interurban RetaiRLOS12010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 5 THETRALVL3-FF51 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail {k.. tf * \. WBC iv ft• 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4,0 4.0 40 4,0 1 00 0 95 1.00 0.95 085 097 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 0 95 1 00 1482 3438 1736 3471 1 00 1 00 0.95 1 00 1482 3438 1736 3471 105 660 155 75 800 0 95 0 95 0.95 0 95 0 95 111 695 163 79 842 111 858 0 79 842 9% 2% 2% 4% 4% Perm Prot 1 6 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 Flt Permitted 0 95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 Volume (vph) 140 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 95 Adj. Flow (vph) 147 Lane Group Flow (voh) 147 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% Turn Type Protected Phases 3 2 Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green, G (s) 122 12.2 31.0 48 38.8 Effective Green, g (s) 12 2 12.2 31.0 48 39.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 15 0 15 0 39 0 06 0 50 Clearance Time (s) 4 0 4 0 4.0 4 0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 30 3.0 30 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 226 1332 104 1727 Ws Ratio Prot c0 09 c0.25 c0 05 0 24 v/s Ratio Perm 0 07 vlc Ratio 0.58 0 49 0.64 0 76 0 49 Uniform Delay, d1 31 5 31 1 20.0 37 0 13.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1 00 0 58 0.72 065 Incremental Delay. d2 3 4 1 7 2.0 25 5 0.9 Delay (s) 34 9 32 7 13.7 523 9.5 Level of Service C C B D A Approach Delay (s) 340 13.7 13.2 Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay 16.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 32.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47 6% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group M:\04\04209 Interurban Retaill0S12010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3-FF51 Page 6 4: 1 -5 SB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail 4:1-5 SB Off -Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail 1 1 ! t 1 P\* j Lane7Group`,T ` - "`$NBl' WBR ';NBT"SBT.''' "-"" Lane Group Flow (vph) 647 266 614 1033 Lane Configurations ri r ++ Tt Queue Length 50th (ft) 166 129 119 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Queue Length 95th (ft) #271 #260 184 100 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 540 918 120 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0 95 0.95 50th Up Block Time ( %) 1% Frt 1.00 0.85 1 00 1.00 95th Up Block Time ( %) 5% Flt Protected 0 95 1 00 1 00 1.00 Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 Satd. Flow (prat) 3367 1553 3539 3471 50th Bay Block Time % Flt Permitted 0 95 1 00 1.00 1 00 95th Bay Block Time % 3% Satd. Flow (perm) 3367 1553 3539 3471 Queuing Penalty (veh) 25 Volume (vph) 595 245 565 0 0 950 Movemeni : ' ' WBL :WBR ' NBT . NBR SBL'' SBT Intersection Summary " ':,` s k # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 Adj. Flow (vph) 647 266 614 0 0 1033 Lane Group Flow (vph) 647 266 614 0 0 1033 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 4% 4% 2% 2% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14 8 14.8 31.0 38 8 Effective Green, g (s) 16 0 16.0 31.0 39 8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 20 0.20 0 39 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 5 2 5.2 4.0 5 0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 311 1371 1727 v/s Ratio Prot CO 19 0.17 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0 17 v/c Ratio 0 96 0 86 0.45 0 60 Uniform Delay, d1 31.7 30.9 18.2 14 4 Progression Factor 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.31 Incremental Delay. d2 25 3 19.9 1.1 1 4 Delay (s) 57 0 50.8 19.2 5.9 Level of Service E D B A Approach Delay (s) 55.2 19.2 5.9 Approach LOS E B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 26.7 0.70 80.0 53.7% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 24.2 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\L'OS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 7 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 8 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail 4\ t \ Lane Grou ? ': p � ,, .a"�`' t EBT'IEBR`- WBT"?71;IBL tJBS ; Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 77 15 33 1022 16 1472 Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 18 3 3 61 1 106 Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 47 15 19 120 8 209 Internal Link Dist (ft) 523 975 1512 918 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % 19% 7% Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 3 IntersectionSummary., .. , _.^ M:\04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail t 4\ t `► 4 4/ Movement 77' HEBL EBT " "`EBR"''!NBL TINBT.nWBR '. °iNBL"4NBT.r"rtJBR. ° SBL :SOT -'':SBR Lane Configurations, sr r 4 - ) f1+ ,1 ft. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1 00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0 85 0.96 1.00 1.00 1 00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0 98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1796 1599 1767 1736 3466 1787 3520 Flt Permitted 0.73 1 00 0 91 0.14 1.00 0 26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1366 1599 1630 255 3466 483 3520 Volume(vph) 85 5 70 5 5 5 30 920 10 15 1205 135 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0 91 0 91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 5 77 5 5 5 33 1011 11 16 1324 148 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 98 77 0 15 0 33 1022 0 16 1472 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9 8 9.8 9.8 45.7 45 7 45.7 45.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10 8 10.8 10.8 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Actuated gIC Ratio 0 16 0.16 0.16 0.71 0 71' 0 71 0.71 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 .5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 262 267 182 2477 345 2516 v/s Ratio Prot 042797 29 c0.42 v/s Ratio Perm c0 07 0 05 0 01 0,13 v/c Ratio 0 44 0.29 0 06 0.18 0 41 Uniform Delay, dl 24 8 24,2 23.2 3.1 3 8 Progression Factor • 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 1 4 0.6 0 1 0.5 0 1 Delay (s) 26.2 24.8 23.3 3.6 3.9 Level of Service C C C A A Approach Delay (s) 25.6 23 3 3 9 Approach LOS C C A 0 03 0 05 2.8 1.00 0.1 2.8 A 0.59 4.6 1.00 0,4 5.0 A 4.9 A Intersectio•,Sum•ary • ss. e w g ` a ± HCM Average Control Delay 6.0 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.9 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.3% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group A 8.0 B M:104 \04209 Interurban Refail\LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 9 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 10 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail 1 `- 1 t �► 1 Lane Group, >,. ; 'u6.: EBT EBR4;WBT .,. TNBL? NBT.7'SBL Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 79 18 84 1202 11 1658 Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 26 6 30 79 4 250 Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 58 20 #84 226 17 #456 Internal Link Dist (ft) 681 222 1266 1354 50th Up Block Time c%) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50th Bay Block Time 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh)'. Inteisectidnt §ummary • : �'x ri '`w # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue maybe longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles M: \04104209 Interurban Retail \LOS12010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail p- 4- k t 1 4/ MSvement rEBL EBT • EBR 'WBL WBT 'WBR' NBL :'NBT_ ' NBR SBL. `SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 44 vi f)a 1 414 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade ( %) -1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4 0• 4 0 4 0 4.0 4,0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0 85 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.98 0 95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 1591 1750 1770 3534 1736 3446 Fit Permitted 0 73 1.00 0.90 0 95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1365 1591 - 1605 1770 3534 1736 3446 Volume (vph) 65 5 70 5 5 5 75 1060 10 10 1405 70 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.89 0 89 0 89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 73 6 79 6 6 6 84 1191 11 11 1579 79 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 79 79 0 18 0 84 1202 0 11 1658 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% Turn. Type Penn Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.1 9 1 9 1 4.8 52.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 10 3 10.3 5 3 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 13 0 13 0.13 0 07 0.69 Clearance Time (s) 5 2 5 2 5 2 4.5 4.8 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3.0 3 0 3 0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 183 213 215 122 2436 v/s Ratio Prot c0 05 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay. d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary: c0 06 0.05 0 01 043 037 008 306 30.3 292 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.6 11 02 322 314 293 C C C 31 8 29 3 C C 0 69 35 0 1 00 150 50.0 D 0.49 5.6 1.00 0.2 5.8 A 8.7 A 1.1 1.6 0.02 4.5 3.0 36 0.01 0.31 37.1 1.00 4.8 41.9 D 48.5 49.3 0.64 4.8 3.0 2209 c0.48 0.75 9.5 1.00 1.5 11.0 B 11.2 B HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 11.3 0 73 769 71.8 % HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C M:\04\04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 11 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 12 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 7:1-405 SB Ramps & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Lane "Group 7 ~ 1 1 `• j r .: ..EBT77EBR7VVBL. WBT71∎18b .NBT. .SSG 'SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) 148 109 173 392 478 -515 #735 26% 48% 8% 187 170 #307 87 764 1143 74 -404 414 133 m242 m238 296 363 10% 6% 250 23% 2% 103 18% 2% 103 Intereeotton,Summary i . - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # '95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal 82 73 131 175 1027 -556 #699 324 28% 41% 48% 55% 398 121 93 157 200 M: \04104209lnterurbanRetaiRLOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 13 THETRALVL3 -FF51. 7: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Movements . 777 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected•Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay. d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 'Nt `4\ t P ► 4/ .EBL EBT -.1"EBR . -.WBL- -WBT WBR' r NBU. "rNBT :,.NBR SBI : •`SBT... -'SBR 4 1900 1900 40 1.00 1 00 0 97 1774 0.97 1774 80 55 0.91 0 91 88 60 0 148 4% 4% Split 6 6 6 36 0 37 0 0.26 50 30 469 0 08 0 32 41 3 1 00 04 41.7 D 124.1 F Infeisectjon Summary, _ T ',. HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group • 1900 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1553 1 00 1553 435 091 478 478 4% Perm 6 36 0 37 0 0 26 50 30 410 c0.31 1 17 51 5 1 00 98 1 149 6 F 1900 4.0 1.00 1 00 095 1787 0.95 1787 170 091 187 187 1% Split. 2 15.7 16.7 0.12 5.0 3.0 213 c0 10 0.88 606 1 00 30.8 91.5 F 1900 4.0 1 00 0 92 1 00 1722 1 00 1722 35 091 38 87 1% 2 2 15.7 16.7 0 12 5.0 3.0 205 0.05 0.42 57.2 1 00 1,4 58.6 E 81.0 F vi to P 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 100 0.95 1.00 1.00 3433 3401 1752 3357 1427 0.95 1 00 0 95 1.00 1.00 3433 3401 1752 3357 1427 45 695 770 270 75 935 110 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 49 764 846 297 82 1027 121 0. 764 1143 0 82 1027 121 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Prot Prot Perm 3 8 7 4 4 29.0 58.3 10.0 40.3 40.3 29.0 59.3 11.0 41.3 41.3 0 21 0 42 0.08 0.30 0.30 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 711 1441 138 990 421 c0 22 0 34 0.05 c0.31 0.08 1 07 0.79 0 59 1.04 0.29 55.5 35.0 62.3 49.4 38.0 0 77 0.65 1 00 1.00 1.00 36.6 0.4 6.7 38.7 1.7 79.1 23.1 69.0 88.1 39.7 E C E F D 45 5 82.1 D F 71.2 1.06 140.0 79.6% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service E 16.0 C M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 14 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd. (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Lane :Group ":' Lane Group Flow (vph) Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft)" 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) .EBL =EBT' 229 -289 #461 150 51% 70% 257 851 393 #502 606 45% 51% 110 \► 1 r EBR"WBC WBT-= WBlfrr 1BL= «NBT; :SBL -SBT BBR7 ' ? 245 303 973 814 160 1361 324 947 319 95 274 402 • -983 146 -848 162 369 0 140 #451 '485 #1234 #274 #988 m155 m333 m0 375 . 527 155 5% 50% 38% 16% 19% 21% 15% 58% 47% 17% 150 250 100 150 100 11% 25% 60% 2% 61% 29% 27% 2% 42% 31% 62% 45% 63% 28% 26% 129 84 294 153 99 161 254 IntersectidnTSummary : x„ " .., - .: > • r a':. - - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite: Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles . m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 15 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd. (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green. G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ' ` t `- 1 4/ L rEBTT: EBRR-f'WBL`T. WET' WBR' :''NBI: NBT'"• NBR' 'SBL sSBT' "'sBR `f f f V `i ft r ) ft. » ft r' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4 0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1 00 0 95 1 00 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1 00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1 00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 0 95 1 00 1 00 0.95 1.00 1 00 0 95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3310 3367 3471 1553 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3310 3367 3471 1553 215 800 230 285 915 765 150 805 475 305 890 300 0 94 0 94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0.94 0.94 229 851 245 303 973 814 160 856 505 324 947 319 229 851 245 303 973 814 160 1361 0 324 947 319 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% Prot pm +ov Prot Perm Prot Prot Free 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 4 8 Free 11 0 37.4 51.2 24 6 51 0 51.0 13.8 42.2 15.8 44.2 140.0 12 0 38.4 53.2 25 6 52 0 52.0 11.8 43.2 16.8 45.2 140.0 0 09 0.27 0.38 0.18 0.37 0 37 0.11 0.31 0.12 0.32 1.00 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5 0 5 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 152 971 602 324 1314 588 185 1021 404 1121 1553 c0 13 0 24 0 04 0 17 0 27 0 09 c0 41 c0.10 0.27 0 11 c0 51 c0.21 151 088 041 094 074 138 086 133 080 0,84 0.21 64 0 48.5 31.8 56 4 38 1 44 0 61.6 48.4 60.0 44.1 0.0 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 0.94 0.49 1.00 259.0 9.0 0.5 33.3 2 3 183 4 31.7 156.6 1.1 0.8 0.0 323.0 57.5 32.3 89.6 40 4 227 4 93.4 2 57.3 22.4 0.0 F E C F 0 F F F E C A 98.7 120.4 193.3 05.0 25.0 F F F C Intersection Summary s ... HCM Average Control Delay 109.7 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.26 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization ' 112.9% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group F 12.0 G M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 16 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with - Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Lane Group ; Lane Group Flow (vph) Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up :Block Time'( ) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th Bay Block.Time 95th Bay Block Time Queuing Penalty'(veh) EBT 154 71 119 798 EBR 282 114 172 250 F W BT 568 144 #226 1251 I NBC-. ,N BT. 289 911 .78 70 #127 91 184 175 1 v SBT ". SBR" 478 242 98 97 155 183 1287 50 36% 37% 51% 56% 105 110' 77.77-11: :7 � u.. # :'95thpercentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 1 1: Gateway Dr. S & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Movement' . Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio' Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm Vic, Ratio. . Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach Delay (s). . Approach LOS Intersection Silmmar"y 7 ` 1 t/. \ 1 r EBL 'EBT :.EBR''WBL. : "WBT•,.:WBR` '' NBC NBT" NBR 'SBL :SBT SBR 4 i' 4t. `f`f 414 ?f r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 0 97 0 95 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.99 100 0.95 100 0.85 0.98 1.00 0.98 0 95 1 00 1 00 1.00 1782 1553 3407 3303 3244 3374 1509 0.98 1.00 0.98 0 95 1 00 1 00 1.00 1782 1553 3407 3303 3244 3374 1509 70 70 .257 247 220 50 263 567 262 0 435 220 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 77 77 '282 .271 242. 55 289 623 288 0 478 242 0 154 282 0 568 0 289 911 0 0 478 242 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 6% 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% Split pm +ov Split Prot Perm 4 4 5 8 8 • 5 2 6 4 6 11.8 19 8 ' 14.3 8.0 . 37.3 24.3 24.3 13 5 22 5 16 0 9 0 38.5 25.5 25.5 0.17 Qi28 .' 0.20 0 11 0.48 0 32 0.32 57 50 57 50 5.2 5.2 5.2 3 0 3 0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 301 514 681 372 1561 1075 481 0.09 c0.06 c0.17 c0.09 c0.28 014 0 12 0.16 .0 51 0 55 .,=•• ;' 0.83.. 0 78 0 58 0 44 0.50 30 3 24 4 30.7 34.5 15.0 21,6 22.1 .:1.00 ' 1' 00 -4.00 0,68 r 0 36, ' 1 00 1.00 1 5 1 2 8.7 9 4 1.5 1.3 3.7 ' 31.7 25 6 ' 39 4 .•:.. 33.0 : 6:9 ' 23.0 25.8 C C D C A C C 278 ' ' 39.4 ' 132 23.9 C D B C HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio • Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Util zation' c Critical Lane Group 23.1 0.66 .' 80 0 Sum of lost time (s) 61.1% : ICU Level of Service HCM Level of Service 12.0 M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 2 2: SR 599 NB Off -Ramp & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail t L'ae.:Groip "; : EBL. aEBR "NBT 813T Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 72 849 963 Queue'Length 50th (ft) 121 ` 30 32 ` 73 Queue Length 95th (ft) 179 57 43 m112 Internal Link Dist (ft) 329 519 184 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) . 1% Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 50.th,Bay *Block Time % 95th Bay Block Time % 18% Queuirig,Penaity (veh) 6 Intersection Summary m Volume, for 95th' percentile queue is metered by upstream signal M:\04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 3 2: SR 599 NB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail ♦ `\ t Movement " ' . -E8L' EBR = NBL `NBT. SB-rSBR y, `7 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor. PI-IF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (sign) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated:Green. G (s) Effective Green. g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay. di Progression Factor Incremental Delay d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ff t+ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 40 40 1.00 1.00 0 95 0 95 1.00 0.85 1 00 1 00 0.95 1.00 1 00 1 00 1641 1468 3505 3539 0.95 1.00 1 00 1.00 1641 1468 3505 3539 255 71 0 832 944 0 0 98 0.98 0 98 0 98 0 98 0.98 260 72 0 849 963 0 260 72 0 849 963 0 10% 10% 3% 3% 2% 2% Perm •4 2 6 4 16.7 16.7 53.2 53.2 17.7 17.7 54 3 54 3 0.22 0.22 0 68 0.68 5.0 5.0 5.1 5 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 363 325 2379 2402 c0 16 0.24 c0 27 0 72 28.8 1 00 6.6 35.4 D 33:3 C 0.05 0.22 25.5 1.00 0.3 25.9 C Intersection S "timmaty E- ;` -' 0.36 54 020 03 14 A 14 A 0 40 57 0 55 04 35 A 3.5 A HCM Average Control Delay 7 3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio: •.0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80 0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity.Uttlizat on 47.7 %" 4 ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service A 8.0 A M:\04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 4 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail L "ane,Group`: :r. x. WBL-:WBRT NBT. •'SBL 'SBT *,•e._:? Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 113 865 81 851 Queue.Length 50th (ft) 69' '53 ' '.84 '40 '84 Queue Length 95th (ft) 118 95 m103 #96 130 Internal Link 'Dist '(ft) .1167' . `.120 519 50th Up Block Time ( %) 4% 95th Up Block Time(" /°) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50th Bay,Block Time %..29% 11 ° /,' 95th Bay Block Time % 49% 41.% Queuing Penalty (veh) 44 77 22 interse"ctlon:Sui mary 95th,percentile volume'exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum aher two cycles. m Volume'forw95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.;' 771 M \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 5 3: 48th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Mdvemere a x .. >,WSIO,WBF Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1 00 Frt 1.00 0 85 Flt Protected 0.95 • 1 00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 1482 Flt Permitted . 0.95 1 00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 1482 Volume (vph) 140 Peak -hour factor. PHF 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 147 Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 Heavy.Vehicles ( %) 9% t NBT�.'.NBR, +T. 1900 1900 4.0 '0 95 0 97 1.00 3439 '100 3439 'SBC'` „SBT 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0 95 1736 0.95 1736 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1 00 3471 1 00 3471 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green. g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio • Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s). Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3 /s•Rati6Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio' Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay. d2 Delay.(s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 3 12 2 122 0.15 40 30 253 c0.09 0.58 31 5 1.00 34 34.9 107 0 95 113 113 9% Perm 3 12.2 12.2 0 15 4.0 3.0 226 0 08 0 50 31.1 1 00 1.7 32.8 C C 34.0 C 667 0.95 702 865 2% 155 0.95 163 0 2% 31.0 31.0 039 4.0 3.0 1333 c0 25 77 808 0 95 0 95 81 851 81 851 4 %' 4% Prot 1 6 4.8 4.8 0 06 4.0 3.0 104 `c0 05 38 8 39 8 0 50 50 3.0 1727 0 25 '0.65 0 78 0 49 20.0 37.1 13 4 058 073 065 2,0 28.5 0 9 13.7 55.4 9 6 B E A 13.7 13.6 B B ' tritersecton.Summary r s `` ' ;.Y HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 16.2 HCM Level of Service 0.64 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 47 8% ' ICU Level of Service 32.0 A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 6 2010 Future with-Project: PM Peak Hour 4: 1-5 SB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail 2010 Future with-Project. PM Peak Hour 4: 1-5 SB Off-Ramp & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail c k. t 1 r t Lane Group. :!..' • • 4'.W617WBR -.NBT''''77SBT .'' '.'` KoVe:iiiiiiif '17177.77:77" W81.7 ;'W6k '7:70817Nt3P-?;.-SOL7.I.S.6.7r.77127 777.7.,...".-,7, Lane Group Flow (vph) 647 267 621 1041 Lane Configurations '1) r ++ t+ QueUe'l.e.iigth50th (ft): : 166t:- 130 .:•',121 '7,. 53 ..'• Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Queue Length 95th (ft) #271 #261 186 100 Total Lost time (s) 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 Crileiicar:Link Chit (ft) 5407 : ' • 918 • 120 Lane Util Factor . 0 97 1.00 0.95 0.95 5dthUp Block Time (%) 1% Frt 1 00 0.85 1.00 1.00 95th UP131Ock Time (1) '. .'' . . '. 5% ' ' Fit Protected 0 95 1.00 1 00 1.00 Turn Bay Length (ft) 275 Satd. Flow (prot) 3367 1553 3539 3471 50t1113iy713Ck Time % '• • • Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1 00 1.00 95th Bay Block Time % 3% Satd. Flow (perm) 3367 1553 3539 3471 QUeUing:penalty (veh) , ' 25 Volume (vph) 595 246 571 0 0 958 litereeotledSurnma , ::.- .,- Peak-hour factor, PHF 092 0.92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0.92 Try' ''' -. : :- •7•••77 '7' ' i • Adj. Flow (vph) 647 267 621 0 0 1041 #,): 951h:pe"rcentile yekkne'exceees capacity, queue may be longer . . ...l. ;... Lane Group Flow (vph) 647 267 621 0 0 1041 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. HeaVY,Vehicles (%) - '4% 4% 2% • ' -2% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm Protected.PhaseS , 4 •2 - 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14 8 14.8 31.0 38.8 Effective Green, g (s) 16 0 16.0 31.0 39 8 Actuated, WC !Ratio :. 0 20 0.20 039 ' 050 Clearance Time (s) 5 2 5 2 4.0 5 0 Vehicle,Extension (s) 30 30 3.0 30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 311 1371 1727 v/s Ratio Prot - c0 19 0 18 c0 30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0 96 0 86 0 45 0 60 Uniform Delay, dl 31 7 30 9 18 2 14 4 Progrpi'sion.Factor ; '... 1 00 1.00 1 00 0 31 Incremental Delay. d2 25 3 20 3 1 1 1 4 Delajqs)-: " ' " 57 0 51 2 19 3 59 Level of Service E D B A Approach Delay (s)' , 55 3 19 3 59 Approach LOS E B A 7 ..:-.7:: 'I..-..:ii 1.'7:;..::.-:::::7:. HCM Average Control Delay 26.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM;Volume to Capacity ratio : ° ' 0:71 ': ' '. - ' Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 24,2 Interiection Capacity Utilliation 53.9% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group M:\ 04 \ 04209 Interurban Retail\LOS\2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 MA04104209 Interurban Retail\ LOS \ 2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 7 THETRALVL3-FF51 THETRALVL3-FF51 Page 8 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 2010 Future with- Project. PM Peak Hour 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail • 4- 4 t `► > C 1 P `► 1 -' 5: 56th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Lane Group:+e f ;7.: aNBT; cSBL •SBTejr i :' 'F .: ,fi' °:1 Lane Group Flow(vph) 100 77 15 33 1027 16 1481 Queue length 50th*(ft) 24 '' 18 3 3' • 62--7;:s1 T108" : t Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 47 15 19 122 8 212 IriternalrLlrik Dist (ft)- ?: 523 975 1512, 918 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up:Block Time ( %) r Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 50th Bay Block :Time•% 95th Bay Block Time % 21% 7% Queuing Penalty.(veh) ' • 8 . 3 tritarsectjon >Summary. Arc a . St~ .W"m _ «.:aSa . + 4771", Mpveme it 777 .17777 E B L EBT'. EBRr N/BL''' WBT'"WBR '.' NBC NBT ';NBR= : SBL': SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r .j, ) +p 'I tj, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4 0 4.0 Lane Util: Factor 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0 85 0 96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0 98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1 00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1796 1599 1767 t 736 3466 1787 3520 Flt Permitted 0 73 1.00 0 91 0.14 1 00 0.25 1 00 Satd. Flow (9erm) 1366 1599 1630 251 3466 479 3520 Volume (vph) 86 5 70 5 5 5 30 925 10 15 1210 137 Peak -hour factor. PHF 0.91 0 91 0 91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 95 5 77 5 5 5 33 1016 11 16 1330 151 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 77 0 15 0 33 1027 0 16 1481 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1 %. 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 10/0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm . Protected Phases' 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9 9 9.9' 9.9 45.7 45.7 45.7 45.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10 9 10 9 10 9 47 1 47.1 47 1 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratlo 0:17 0.17 0 17 0.71 0.71 0 71 0 71 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5 0 5 0 5 4 5.4 5 4 5.4 Vehicle'Eztension (s) 3 0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 264 269 179 2473 342 2512 vlsRatio..Prot: • 0 30 c0 42 v/s Ratio Perm c0 07 0 05 0 01 0.13 0 03 v/c Ratio : 0 as 0 29 0 06 0.18 0 42 0 05 0 59 Uniform Delay. d1 24 8 24.2 23 2 3.1 3.8 28 4.7 Progression Factor 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 Incremental Delay. d2 1 4 0 6 0 1 0 5 0.1 0 1 0.4 Delay (s) 26.2 24 8 23.3 3.6 4.0 2 9 5.0 Level of Service C C C A A A A Approach Delay (s) 25.6 23.3 3.9 5.0 Approach LOS C C A A HCM Average Control Delay HCM'Volume to Capacity'ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity:Utilization c Critical Lane Group 60 0 56 66.0 60 5% • HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU. Level of Service 8.0 B M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS12010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 M: \04\04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 9 THETRALVL3 -FF51 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 10 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail 4 t \. Lane:Group'.M "''IEBT .EBR ;„1NBTr .NBL' NBT SBL'SBTu; r : i4g.,_,R. 18 84 1205 11 1663 6 30 801 4 251 20 #83 228 17 #461 222' 1266r 1354 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 79 Qiieue:Length'SOth (ft) = , 27 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 58 Internal Link Dist.(ft)7 .681 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th. Up Block Time (%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 50th BayBlock:Time` %': 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing'Penalty (Deli) - ' jntersection•Summa y. :: .ti. ° . - _ 4- • b:. #,95th' percentile; volume exceeds capacity, queue maybe :longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 11 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 6: 58th Avenue S & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail Movertiare z 77 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Grade ( %) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd'.Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd, 'Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj Flow (vph) Lane:Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type . Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gIC Ratio Clearance Time.(s) Vehicle Extension (s) Larie.Grp Cap (vph). v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform`Delayi d1; • Progression Factor IncremerifalDelay,;d2 Delay (s) Level 'of•Service r` Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS c <. 4\ t /, `► EBERTEBT f EBR,7'WBL 'V1/BT "WBR : •'NBL rNBT :'' NBR .. SBL'. 'SBT SBR 4 it Q+ `f ?b `f ft+ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -1% 0% 0% 0% 4 0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 100 0.85 0.96 1.00 1.00 100 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1789 1591 1750 1770 3534 1736 3446 0 73 1.00 0.90 0.95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1364 1591 1605 1770 3534 1736 3446 67 5 70 5 5 5 75 1063 10 10 1408 72 0.89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 75 6 79 6 6 6 84 1194 11 11 1582 81 0 81 . ° 79 ' 0 18 0 84 1205 0 11 1663 0 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 92 104 0.14 5.2 30 184 c0.06 0 44 306 1 00 17 32.3 'C 31 8 C Inte'rsecfioh,5ummary 7. HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 4 92 104 0 14 52 30 215 8 0 05 0.37 30 3.... 1 00 11: 314 C 11 4 0.73 77:0 72.1% 9.2 10.4 0.14 5.2 3.0 217 0.01 0.08 :29:1 1.00 29.3 29.3 C 4.8 5.3 0.07 4.5 3.0 122 c0.05 0.69 • 35.0 1.00 15.0 50.0 D HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 52.2 53.0 0.69 4.8 3.0 2432 c0.34 0.50 .5.7 1.00 0:2 5.8 A 8.7 A 1.1 1.6 0 02 45 30 36 001 48.5 49.3 0.64 4.8 3.0 2206 c0.48 0 31 0.75 37 2 9.6 1.00 1.00 48 1.5 41 9 11.1 D. B 11.3 B B 16.0 C M: \04 \04209 interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 12 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 7: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail 1 4\ t ► 1 4 Lane Group :: EBT "EBR- WBL ' WBT: `NBL" NBT SBL• "SST, SBR•." Lane Group Flow (vph) 148 478 187 87 764 1146 82 1031 121 Queue. Length 50th (ft) 109 =515 170 74 404;..'416` ' 73 -559 Queue Length 95th (ft) 173 #735 4307 133 m242 m240 131 #703 Internal'L' ink Dist (ft) ` 392 296 1.......' ' 363 ' • ;324 • 50th Up Block Time ( %) 26% 10 6% % 29% . 95th Up'BIock Time ( %) 48 %' 8% Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 50th_BayBlock Time'% • 23% 95th Bay Block Time % 2% Queuing Perialty.(veh) _ 103 Interseotlon Summary;. . -•. ^Volume'exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite.T Queue shown is maximum after two cycles #` , 95t.................. centile volume exceeds capacity. queue may be longer Queue shown is maximum after two cycles m Volume, for 95th' percentile, queue is metered by upstream. signal. 175 18% 48% 2% 55% . 105 403 .93_. 157 200 M. \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 13 THETRALVL3 -FF51 7: 1 -405 SB Ramps 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail MoVement 77,' "ERE-' EBT Lane Configurations Ideal' Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume '(vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph)• Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated 'Green, :G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuate i g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor . Incremental Delay. d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s). Approach LOS t `► r .;EBR-74BL WBT WBR -- NBL NBT. =NBR. "SBL` T:SBT• SBR 4 r 1900 '1900 1900 1900 4.0 40 40 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 00 0.97 1 00 0 95 1774 1553 1787 0.97 1 00 0 95 1774 1553 1787 80 55 435 170 0.91 0.91 0 91 0 91 88 60 '478 187 0 148 478 187 4% 4% 4% 1% Spbt Perm Spat 6 '6 2 6 6 36.0 36.0 15.7 37.0 37.0 16.7 0.26 026 0.12 5.0 5.0 5 0 3.0 3 0 3 0 469 410 213 008 c010 c0 31 0 32 1.17 0.88 41.3 51 5 60 6 1 00 1.00 '1.00 0.4 98 1 30 8 41.7 149.6 91 5 D F F 124.1 F Inferse'ctlon Summary 7: --r HCM Average Control Delay 71.6 HCM `Volume to Capacity. ratio 1:06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Intersection` Capacity Utilisation 79.7°4 c Critical Lane Group s. �) �1♦ ft, r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4 0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.97 0.95 1 00 0 91 0.91 0.92 1.00 0.96 1 00 1 00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0 95 1 00 1.00 1722 3433 3402 1752 3357 1427 1.00 0.95 1.00 0 95 1 00 1.00 1722 3433 3402 1752 3357 1427 35. 45 695 773 270 75 938 110 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 91 0 91 0.91 38 49 764 849 297 82 1031 121 87 0 764 1146 0 82 1031 121 1% 1% • '2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Prot Prot Perm 2 3 8 7 4 2 4 15.7' 29.0 58 3 10.0 40.3 40.3 16.7 29.0 59 3 1 1 0 41.3 41 3 0.12. 0.21 0.42 008 0.30 0.30 50 4.0 50 5.0 5.0 50 3.0 • 3.0 30 30 3.0 30 205 711 1441 138 990 421 0.05 c0.22 0 34 0 05 c0.31 0.08 0.42 1.07 0.80 0.59 104 0.29 57 2 55.5 35 1 62 3 49.4 38.0 1 00 0.77 0 65 1 00 1 00 1.00 14 36.6 04 67 400 1.7 58.6' 79.1 23 1 69 0 89 3 39.7 E E C E F D 81.0 45.5 83 1 F 0 F HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 14 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd. (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail c~ k. 4\ t `►1 4' EBL 'EBTw'EBR'-`W,BL WBT' WBR °tJBL'NBT',SBL';`56T ':SBR'` ; 0 851 245 303 973 815 160 1362 326 948 320 1:' 393 95 274 402 -985 146 -848 163 „ 370. 0 3 #502 140 #451 485 #1236 #274 #989 m155 m331 m0 606 • 375 527 155 5% 50% 38% 16% 19% 21% 15% '58% 47% 17% 0 150 250 100 150 100 . ' 45% 11-% 25% -:60% 2% 61% 29% 27% 51% 2% 42% 31% 62% 45% 63% 28% 26% 7: 110 129 84: '7294 153 99 `1617 , 253 Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 Queue Length 50th (ft) -29 Queue Length 95th (ft) #46 Internal Link Dist (ft) 50th Up Block Time ( %) 95th Up Block Time ( %) Turn Bay Length (ft) 15 50thBay Block Tiirne °/(:. 51, 95th Bay Block Time % 70 Queuing.Perialty (veh);' • 25 IntersectionSumrna ry_ : . .17 .:. ';.' • Volume- exceeds capacity; queue is theoretically infinite :. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles 95thi percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be Monger Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is, metered by upstream signal 1 M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 15 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour 8: Southcenter Blvd (Segment 18) & Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Interurban Retail J 1~ k 4\ t `► 1. -' Moveme5t 77 :•" ~' EBL`` EB7' EBR NIBL "`WBT': 1NBR 'NBC NBT NBW, SBL -SBT. ':SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor. PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected' Phases Permitted Phases Acti)ated'Green. :G (s) Effective Green. g (s) Actuated, g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v /s. Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio.;, Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ss r ++ r ++ r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 40 4,0 4.0 4.0 4,0 40 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 .1 00 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0 97 0 95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 85 1.00 1 00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1 00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 95 1 00 0 95 1 00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3310 3367 3471 1553 0 95 1.00 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0 95 1 00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1752 3310 3367 3471 1553 216 800 230 285 915 766 150 806 475 306 891 301 0 94 0.94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0.94 0 94 0 94 0.94 230 851 245 303 973 815 160 857 505 326 948 320 230 851 245 303 973 815 160 1362 0 326 948 320 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% Prot pm -ov Prot Perm Prot Prot Free 7 4 • 5 3 8 '. 5 2 1 6 4 8 Free .11.0 37.4 51.2•'24'.6 51'.0 51:0 138 421 ' 158 44.2 140.0 120 384 53.2 25.6 52.0 520 148 43.2 168 45.2 140.0 0.09 0 27 0.38 - 0:18 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.31 0 12 0 32 1 00 50 50 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 50 50 50 5.0 30 30 30 3.0 3.0 30 30 30 30 3.0 152 971 602 324 1314 588 185 1021 404 1121 1553 c0 13 0 24 0.04 0.17 0 27 0.09 c0.41 c0 10 0.27 0.11 c0.51 c021 1.51 0 88 0.41 0.94 0 74 ' 1 39 0 86 1 33 0 81 0 85 021 64 0 48 5 31 8 56.4 38.1 44 0 61 6 48.4 60 0 44.2 0.0 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 94 0 49 1 00 261 7 90 05 33.3 2.3 1841 31.7 1570 1 1 0.8 0.0 325 7 57 5 32 3 89.6 40.4 228.1 93 4 205 4 57 3 22.3 0.0 F E C F D F F F E C A 99 4 120 7 193.7 25.0 F F F C hnYersection S�tnirnary �',< HCM Average Control Delay HCM.Volume 10 Capacity ratio . Actuated Cycle Length 15) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 110.0 1.26 140.0 113.1% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU. Level of Service 12.0 G M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retall\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 16 32 North Driveway & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail t Movement '., ,t,T ..WBOrWBR t NBT,'.NBR:' SBL SBTa ``'jT�' Lane Configurations ) ?i• ff • Sign Control . Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh /h) - - .42 23 807 14 31 904 • Peak Hour Factor 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 Hourlyflow rate (veh/hi- 46 • 25 877 •15 '34 - 983 Pedestrians Lane Width (ftj . • Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type • TWLTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstream.signal (ft). • . . pX. platoon unblocked vC. conflicting volume 1443 446 892 vC1. stage 1 conf vol 885 ■C2, stage 2 conf vol 559 vCu, unblocked vol 1443 446 892 tC. single(s) 6.8 6 9 4 1 tC. 2 stage (s) 5 8 tF (s) " • 3.5 3 3 2.2_ p0 queue free % 82 96 96 iM capacity(veh/h) 249 565 • .756 Direcliogra-660. : ^i: W61.,WB27N8.1"NB.2.8 -8 :sr327:SB -3 Volume Total 46 25 585 308' 34 '491 Volume Left 46 0 0 0 34 0 Volume `Right 0 25 0 15 ` 0 0 cSH 249 565 1700 1700 756 1700 Volume to Capacity ' 0 1 8 - " 0 0 4 0 34 0.18 . 0'04 0 29 • Queue Length (ft) 16 3 0 0 3 0 Control Delay (s) 22.7 11 7 0 0 0 0- 10 0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A Approach`Delay (s) . 18.8 010 :0.3 Approach LOS C 491 0 0 1700 0 29.' 0 0.0 Intersection' Summary ., Average Delay 0 8 intersection Capacity Uroization -: 37.2 %' •. ICU Level of Service M \04 \04209 Interurban Retail\LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 1 34: South Driveway & Interurban Avenue S 2010 Future with- Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail r t t `► 1 Movement W6C, WBl2•` "Ng T7NBR SSL" SsT: Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh /h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (veh /h) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1474 421 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 820 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 654 vCu, unblocked vol 1474 421 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 88 84 cM capacity (veh /h) 234 584 r +1. t+ Stop Free Free 0% 0% 0% 25 88 734 41 86 860 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 27 96 798 45 93 935 842 842 4.2 2.2 88 783 Direction: Lane:# W.B 1 -W. JB72 . NB 17. N6-21 SB 1 ' SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 27 27 0 234 0.12 10 22 4 C 14 6 B 96 0 96 584 0.16 15 12.4 B Intersection Surriniary r .' 532 311 93 467 467 0 0 93 0 0 • 0 45 0 0 0 1700 1700 783 1700 1700 0.31 -0.18 0112 0.27 0.27 •0 0 10 0 0 00 0.0 102 00 00 B '00 09 Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.4 42.0% ICU Level of Service A M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Page 2 Existing- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Arterial Level of Service: NB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) ',,:',', ,' -,. • „:-.,, . : Arterial: Flow : Running .Signal: . Travel, Dist - -Arterial .- Arterial Cross Street . , , .. , Class ..-; ,., Speed.. Time Delay Time (s) , (mi) .,; Speed., ':.-, LOS Southcenter Blvd. (S III 35 15.5 136.5 152.0 0.1 2.7 F 1-405 SB Off-Ramp-Foil! 35 16.4 20.9 37.3 0.1 12.4 E 58th Avenue S 111 35 93.6 5.3 98.9 0.9 33.1 A 56th Avenue S 111 35 58.9 4.3 63.2 0.6 32.6 A 1-5 SB Off-Ramp III 35 22.7 18.4 41.1 0.2 16.6 D Total 111 207.1 185.4 392.5 1.9 17.6 D Arterial Level of Service: SB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) ,::Arleriaf,7 .;,. ..: 06%4 -.... Ruhnirig. ;.::' :,Sidrial ..::., Travel CiTigStreet - ,,, 1.. Class Speed Time : Delay - . Time ('). .: ,(Mi) ..: :S50e4-,..: .iJ-OS 56th Avenue S 111 35 22.7 5.1 27.8 0.2 24.5 B 58th Avenue S III 35 58.9 11.7 70.6 0.6 29.2 B 1-405 SB Ramps III 35 93.6 56.3 149.9 0.9 21.8 C Southcenter Blvd. (S III 35 16.4 20.5 36.9 0.1 12.5 E Total III 191.6 93.6 285.2 1.8 22.7 C C.. to 77-1-1.2 M:\04\04209 Interurban Retail\LOS\Existing- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 THETRALVL3-FF51 2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Arterial Level of Service: NB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Arterial . '' Flow Running Signal Travel Dist , Arterial l• Arterial Cross Street - .. Class.- ,:, .- Speed :•• Time Delay Time (s) „: (mi) : Speed - '.. LOS 35 15.5 174.0 189.5 0.1 2.2 F 35 16.4 23.2 39.6 0.1 11.7 E 35 93.6 5.8 99.4 0.9 32.9 A 35 58.9 4.5 63.4 0.6 32.5 A 35 22.7 19.3 42.0 0.2 16.2 D 207.1 226.8 433.9 1.9 15.9 D Southcenter Blvd. (S 111 1-405 SB Off-Ramp-Foil! 58th Avenue S 111 56th Avenue S 111 1-5 SB Off-Ramp 111 111 Total Arterial Level of Service: SB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) ':_,,,.,*P' • :.!•:,:,,,, f,,,/: ',..k.'..6, Art-eril ,'•,":,: s „t-'W: Fr& :,I3unkng Trayel - :'i'=".3-- Dist: ./reirteilel ,. ettat CrOSS`;;Street' ' 'ClaS, ::HX;-epeed ' ,'' Time 't Delajf. 'Tim , e' (S) . 1 (mi) -''''.!'SPe4ed :COS 56th Avenue S 111 35 22.7 5.5 28.2 0.2 24.1 B 58th Avenue S 111 35 58.9 16.5 75.4 0.6 27.4 B 1-405 SB Ramps 111 35 93.6 81.7 175.3 0.9 18.7 C Southcenter Blvd. (S 111 35 16.4 22.0 38.4 0.1 12.0 E Total 111 191.6 125.7 317.3 1.8 20.4 C c 9 .D• . / (;), ( • p M:\04\04209 Interurban Retail\LOS\2010 Baseline- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 THETRALVL3-FF51 2010 Future with - Project: PM Peak Hour Interurban Retail Arterial Level of Service: NB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Arterial Cross. Street:. Class Southcenter Blvd. (S 111 1 -405 SB Off-Ramp-Foil! 58th Avenue S 56th Avenue S 1 -5 SB Off -Ramp Total 111 111 111 III Flow . Running Speed. Time 35 15.5 35 16.4 35 93.6 35 58.9 35 22.7 207.1 Signal Delay 174.3 23.2 5.8 4.5 19.4 227.2 Travel .Time (s) 189.8 39.6 99.4 63.4 42.1 434.3 Arterial Level of Service: SB Interurban Avenue S (Arterial Segment) Dist Arterial Arterial (mi) Speed •:::., ,; LOS 0.1 2.2 F 0.1 11.7 E 0.9 32.9 A 0.6 32.5 A 0.2 16.2 D 1.9 15.9 D Cross Street;: 56th Avenue S 58th Avenue S 1-405 SB Ramps Southcenter Blvd. (S Total .Flow .r Running Speed, Time'' 35 35 35 35 22.7 58.9 93.6 16.4 191.6 `7-Signal '. Delay 5.6 17.0 82.8 22.0 127.4 fir- 15 -I - (90 ,3 n Travel ;Time (s) 28.3 75.9 176.4 38.4 319.0 Artenal ..: Arterial (mi). Speed ... LOS 0.2 24.0 B 0.6 27.2 B 0.9 18.6 C 0.1 12.0 E 1.8 20.3 C 7 ` 1 ,N. p4 (icy)- C. M: \04 \04209 Interurban Retail \LOS \2010 Future with Project- PM Peak Hour.sy6 Page 1 THETRALVL3 -FF51 Transportation Impact Analysis •.44..-...?.,...,.. -:: . -i. •''.. - 4 :.', ,..., 1.• , ,.. •is) .s. . .1.,:',.•71....,..1,. INTERURBAN RETAIL TUKWILA, WA ov) Prepared for: Gramor Development WA, LLC ,.t ,^ • July 2004 Prepared by: The Transpo Group, Inc. 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 Phone: 425.821.3665 Fax: 425.825.8434 www.thetranspogroup.com © 2004 The Transpo Group Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description 1 Study Approach 1 EXIS -1NG AND FUTURE WITHOUT - PROJECT CONDmONS 4 Roadway Network 4 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes 4 Planned Improvements 8 Intersection Operations 8 Arterial Operations 9 Traffic Safety 10 Transit Service 11 Non - Motorized Facilities 11 PROJECT IMPACTS 12 Trip Generation 12 Trip Distribution and Assignment 12 Traffic Volume Impacts 13 Intersection Operations 13 Arterial Operations 17 Site Access Analysis 18 Non - Motorized Facilities 18 Parking 18 Traffic Safety Impacts 19 Transportation Impact Fees 19 SUMMARY /CONCLUSIONS 20 List of Tables Table 1. Existing and Future Without- Project Intersection LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour 9 Table 2. Existing and Future without - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 10 Table 3. Accident History Summary 10 Table 4. Project Trip Generation: PM Peak Hour 12 Table 5 Project Traffic Volume Impacts- PM Peak Hour 13 Table 6. Future Without - Project and Future with- Project LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 17 Table 7. Future with- Project and Future with - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 17 Table 8. Driveway LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour 18 Table 9. Peak Parking Demand- Weekday Peak Conditions ..19 List of Figures Figure 1. Site Vicinity 2 Figure 2. Site Plan 3 Figure 3. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4. Future Baseline PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7 Figure 5. Project Trip Distribution 14 Figure 6. Project Trip Assignment 15 Figure 7. Future with Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 16 • • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Introduction This report summarizes the results of the transportation impact analysis prepared for the proposed retail development located at 13038 Interurban Avenue S in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to identify any potential traffic - related impacts the proposed project would have on the roadway network in the site vicinity and to recommend mitigation measures, as necessary, to mitigate those impacts. Project Description The proposed project is located mid -block between the intersections of Gateway Drive S and 48th Avenue S on Interurban Avenue S. A site vicinity map is included as Figure 1. The site is currently vacant, as a gas station and convenience market formerly located on -site has been demolished. Access to the site will be consistent with the existing configuration, with full access to existing private driveways located on both the east and west of the site which ultimately access Interurban Avenue S. Full access is currently permitted at the intersections with Interurban Avenue. The project would consist of a single building, which would include an approximately 1,700 square foot (sf) Starbucks Coffee shop with drive -thru window, a 1,365 sf fast -food restaurant without drive -thru (identified as a Quiznos), and approximately 2,650 sf of specialty retail space. Figure 2 includes the site plan used as the basis for this analysis. Full buildout is anticipated by 2005. However, to be consistent with other studies conducted in the City of Tukwila, and as directed by City staff, a 2010 horizon year was used for this study. Study Approach In order to meet the study's objectives, the study area and scope were coordinated in advance with review staff from the City of Tukwila. Four signalized intersections near the project site were selected for analyses during the PM peak hour. In addition, to satisfy City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48- Transportation Concurrency Standards and Impact Fees, four additional signalized intersections were selected for PM peak analysis south of Interstate 5 (1 -5) to allow for the analysis of the Interurban Avenue arterial unit. This arterial unit is defined by the TMC as between I -5 and Interstate 405 (1 -405). The four nearest intersections were identified due to potential impacts based on overall distribution of project trips. The selected arterial unit was selected as it will be impacted by five or more peak hour trips. In addition to intersection and arterial levels of service, the scope of the analysis includes a review of traffic safety and impact fee calculation. The Transpo Group 104209.00\04209r1.doc 1 ,t. 5. 133R0 c Plit-r, '74 z • - s ( , wit I V .1 • s ST N NOT TO SCALE ,''''''! sxrwAy VI‘ ' • '...i.•:` ' Sr,•-• P f ';•..) *:?..c *.i: •*°-1,,,_,...->' •*. •',..' ,:.%*•;•-, .,1,-- • • •,. ....., ;-,i• S 127TH F,..■ as, ..,t , , -t i s i"l'at''''' 1 qt:.—• ": : "Li 1281H _ i '1 .? ..., .." 0 ' . *"; :41':•ii ,:,.,,., .1 ^,s 12:.1.;,pi - s 1?91,.. sr sP„, 3cr • • • 0"3$ 3 7)31 • '`■ .4; -,(c-,9 S4 s 1-.)cry:-, $,1 ! 4 /,, ,: Aro., R3 ..I:' •'3:,..fe..3 • ----___:,:„.....—,i„......,....... '-s. z,.. t.„,• • i. .....1=N? , . ,,,,r-..-, ,,r/r, P _,.. 133RD —4-1'1 13,14 ...131n, 135M_ • 14 LACK. •V . 13 ----- - •• . • * N r fags :*7 4.1. ER Ac ",••• .- • BLACK RIVE. RIPAR1i4li),V . 40(/.1,,, 4 • • S'T v' 1, r:s ,146rol...7_ j -Tri, i . i 1 D ST nw • Ca 144TH; 144/t. Si 44..71.4vi 't; • 1.18 5 ,147TH h iST't ; T.113t41 tirQ _ • 3 At, fat.NTON f/•1• c. :;" s'>5 ,11: • 4. . W".. , e ,J $41 S 1S61H ST ! T k") !: I 138T11 44 Pi — Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. Figure 1 Site Vicinity Interurban Retail M:104'04209 Interurban Retz.Mrapics\graphic01 <F> brandonm 07113104 17:04 POLL PKWY riots 31.,55.Z BAKER "-1 • • STRAND ER--41 ; BLVD N:se 4- rer:LAztt 0,11, „ , I 16,4„disi 011%P.ER a ..rrItsic-CASC.AC • 51.4 • This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All rights reserved. The Transpo Group - — m. m �y i:� —ter a. NI jr .i. 1=1�t 1 _I�U.'lio ; I -_a Ems[ - - -- 1 �I�d _a J'+���.��_ le�'iN o '- "Mt - C""�I�1 ®i � _L �4r .L�- .�M�P1�it!_- ld'J� Pd^'• -- �r���l ®IM imi j = CIF � _M ®e ®®IM a ` ,e. a=“ti e II Il Fagg®®® ,r- ,, 1.:= JL 1 ,('8i' - as - II— 1 '...0 -- fnt".��° 2 v= — — as aai OW= liMnb, f_MF_- 0 t7iir— -.N -® 1. -- .1 .. MM. vitil i :06,441 ae�a1 �+ 1 - M Mme ,r -_ .. -.- _s . IM aIMLIII MMEma 2r-4- 0 H as tM/E,N �® -.�j; C°-Iaa9 ;TIE :. =iv ,. L ___ M M le ei4- +BS + j/ +rol`- Wiz ,+r lai.01. 1. 'r tea. - q r— Las. mss -.7, otrireb , — '0 _ ill'' ii .ih•.mileErn Figure 2 Site Plan jInterurban Retail M104 ;04209 Interurban Retail 6Grapnicslgrapn c01 <G; brannonni 07113iO4 17:00 Transpo Group • • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Existing and Future Without- Project Conditions This section of the report documents existing conditions in the vicinity of the proposed project, including the surrounding roadway network, PM peak hour traffic volumes, PM peak hour intersection and arterial operations, traffic safety, transit service, and an inventory of adjacent non - motorized facilities. The analysis of existing and future without- project traffic conditions provides a frame of reference when evaluating potential project impacts. Project impacts are measured by comparing the difference in area operations between the with- and without - project scenarios: Roadway Network Existing roadway and non - motorized characteristics for the immediate study area are described below. Interurban Avenue S is a five -lane roadway that runs southeast - northwest in the project vicinity. Between Interstate 5 and Interstate 405, Interurban Avenue S is designated as a principal arterial, while to the north of I -5 adjacent to the project site, it is designated as a minor arterial. Major intersections along Interurban Avenue S are signalized. Sidewalks exist on the east side of the roadway in the immediate area of the project, and intermittently on the west side. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. S 133rd Street /Gateway Drive S is designated as a minor arterial to the west of Interurban Avenue S, and a local roadway to the east. It consists of four lanes to the east of Interurban Avenue S (Gateway Drive S), and two lanes to the west. Sidewalks exist on the south side of the roadway, and intermittently on the north side. The posted speed is 30 mph to the west of Interurban Avenue S, and 25 mph to the east. 48th Avenue S is a local roadway located to the south of the project site. 48th Avenue S is a two -lane roadway with sidewalks located on the east side of the street, and intermittently on the west side. A traffic signal controls its intersection with Interurban Avenue S. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. 52nd Avenue S /56th Avenue S is a two -lane collector arterial to the south of Interurban Avenue S (52nd Avenue S), and a local roadway to the north (56th Avenue S). A traffic signal controls its intersection with Interurban Avenue S. Sidewalks exist on the west side of the roadway. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Existing and Future Traffic Volumes Existing weekday PM peak hour volumes were collected at the study area intersections in May and June 2004. The existing PM peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 3. Based on direction from City Staff, and to remain consistent with other studies conducted in the area, a 1.5- percent annual growth rate was applied to the existing volumes. In addition, City Staff indicated that traffic volumes from the planned Southcenter Mall expansion project, currently undergoing environmental impact review, should be included in the future 2010 traffic volumes. Since the Southcenter Mall expansion has not been approved, the inclusion of this traffic results in a conservative estimate of the future forecast volumes. The combination of the background traffic growth rate and this pipeline project account for The Transpo Group 104209.00;04209r1 .doc 4 • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 future traffic growth in the study area. The resulting future without- project traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 4. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00`:,04209x1 .doc 5 OINTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST-GATEWAY 0 45 390 200 200 >~ fj 220 65 N.., / 235 65 "- , ,r. 510 235 240 OINTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF-RAMP 850 N 235 65 NN 745 OINTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S 70 95 U 725 / 125 (� 140 600 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -5 SB OFF -RAMP 860 N 225 (545 " 510 OINTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUE S 15 5 1,095 125 >• ti 5 %j5 80 ?.1 X510 5 i-+. 835 60 25 w A Q Z v NOT TO SCALE OINTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 10 5 1,275 '.,/ 5 65)'1/4 5 60 >,, • 1/45 10 5 iy r 960 60 65 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 70 40 835 '.,/ 30 100 S'••• "( 155 75 ), N \\ 245 50 685 360 635 OINTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 280 700 795 N-+" "..—. 775 235 • fj `` 260 180 )J/ N.....5 \ 435 670 iy .r 735 210 135 Figure 3 Existing (2004) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail M:\04104209 Inlerurban Relai \Gr pf 1 -ws grap ^ic01 <B> bra durm 07/13/04 17:07 The Transpo Group OINTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST- GATEWAY 0 50 430 "1,---" 220 220 � f‹ 245 70 ' / .5260 70 .y ,r. 560 255 260 OINTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF -RAMP 935 N 255 > 70 820 OINTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S 75 105 800 ( 140 155 660 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -5 SB OFF -RAMP 950 N 245 / 595 565 OINTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUE S 15 5 _ 1355 r/55 85 / .510 5 ,r. 920 70 30 OINTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 10 5 1,405 5 70 \Th, Ar<5 65 >.• "t 10 5 — ,r. 1,060 70 75 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 75 45 935 **,- 35 110 5. - \ 170 80 / \ 270 55 r 770 435 695 OINTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 305 765 890 •." • — 300 S."..- %/ 285 215 > , / .`\ .5475 800 ,. ,r. 805 230 150 Figure 4 Baseline (2006) PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail M:404\04209 Intembon RetadliGrap"is;grap`:ic01 <C' brandonm 07113!04 17:07 Transpo Group • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Planned Improvements The City of Tukwila's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program was reviewed to determine what if any improvement projects were planned at any of the study area intersections. No projects were identified that would directly impact the operations at study intersections. However, one project was identified on Interurban Avenue that will improve general transportation facilities, but not increase roadway capacity. This project would construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, and landscaping improvements on Interurban Avenue between S 143rd Street and Fort Dent Way. The design phase of the project was scheduled to begin in early 2004, with no completion date identified. No other projects were identified at study intersections or along the studied arterial unit. Intersection Operations A level of service (LOS) analysis was conducted for the study area intersections for the weekday PM peak hour. The signalized intersections were analyzed using Synchro 5.0. This software program is based on methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board, 2000 Edition). LOS values range from LOS A, which indicates good operating conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, which indicates extreme congestion and long vehicle delays. LOS is measure in terms of total average intersection delay for signalized intersections, and total vehicle delay by lane group for unsignalized intersections. A more detailed explanation of LOS criteria is provided in Appendix A. Table 1 summarizes both existing and future without- project, weekday PM peak hour LOS, for the eight study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. The signal timing information used for the intersection analysis was based on information obtained from the City of Tukwila. Signal timing information from existing conditions was optimized within parameters from the timing information and held constant for all future operating analyses. The Transpo Group 104209.00\,04209r1.doc 8 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Table 1. Existing and Future Without- Project Intersection LOS Summary - PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions'» w' LOS, Interurban Ave S/ Gateway Dr S Interurban Ave 5/ . ?SR_599 NB Off-Ramp _ I Interurban Ave S/ 348th Ave 5 Interurban Ave 5/ SB Off -Ramp_ Interurban Ave 5/ _52nd Ave S 'Interurban Ave 5/ B 10.1 58th Ave _S Interurban Ave S/ Fort Dent Wy- 1 -405 D i 49.8 i 0.93 SB.- ;Interurban Ave 5/ iSouthcenter Blvd 1. Level of Service 2. Average vehicle delay in seconds 3. Volume to capacity ratio Delay2 v/c 21.2 ! 0.60 A 7.2 0.43 C 2010 Future without Project LOS r-- C A Delay 15.1 0.58 ` B 21.91 0.63 I; C 5.6 0.51 0.66 A. v/c •-- iI F. 23.0 ;' 0.65 7.3 11 0.48 16.0 ' 0.64 26.7 i1 0.70 6.0 I I 0.56 11.3 0.73 JL F 87.6 .1 ,1..1,4 F 109.7 1: 1.26 J As Table 1 shows, the study intersections adjacent to the•project site, including Interurban Avenue S /SR 599 NB Off -Ramp, Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S, and Interurban Avenue S /I -5 SB Off -Ramp, all currently operate at LOS C or better, and are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS C or better in 2010. The two intersections on the far southern end of the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment currently have the highest amount of delay of the study intersections. The Interurban Avenue S /Fort Dent Way intersection currently operates at LOS D, but degrades to LOS E in 2010 baseline conditions. The Interurban Avenue S /Southcenter Boulevard intersection currently operates at LOS F, and is anticipated to continue to do so in the future, as no improvements are planned for this intersection by the City. Arterial Operations To satisfy TMC 9.48, an arterial LOS arterial analysis was conducted for the Interurban Avenue S arterial unit. TMC 9.48.070 defines the Interurban Avenue S arterial unit as being between I -5 and I -405, and states that LOS E or better shall be maintained for this arterial. Consistent with the Highway Capacity Manual, arterial level of service is reported in a range from LOS A to LOS F (LOS A indicating free flow and LOS F indicating failing conditions) and is a function of average travel speed (miles per hour) along the arterial. Travel speed takes into account driving time between intersections, and the through movement delay encountered at all signalized intersections along the segment. Table 2 shows the resulting LOS for the Interurban Avenue arterial segment. The LOS is based on an arterial classification of Interurban Avenue S as an arterial Class III facility. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00;04209r1.doc 9 Interurban Retail. Tukwila. WA DRAFT July 2004 Table 2. Existing and Future without - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour Arterial Segment Interurban Avenue: 1 -5 to 1 -405 Existing Conditions Speed) oor 20.2 LOSS" 2010 Future without Project SpeedP 1. Average of northbound and southbound travel speeds 18.2 LOS As shown in Table 2, the Interurban Avenue arterial unit currently operates at LOS C, and is anticipated to continue to operate at LOS C in future baseline conditions. Based on these results, the arterial segment is currently operating, and is anticipated to continue operating within the City's LOS standard by 2010 without the proposed project. Traffic Safety The purpose of this section is to identify any existing safety concerns within the defined study area in order to evaluate the proposed project impacts at these locations. Historical accident records were obtained from the City of Tukwila for the most recent three -year period available (2001 to 2003). Table 3 provides a summary of the accident records at each study intersection. Both the annual average and the accident rate per Million Entering Vehicles (MEV) are summarized. The accident rate, expressed in terms of accidents per MEV, is an important measure since it factors in the observed traffic volumes in the calculations and provides a perspective in relation to the total entering volume (1'EV). The average daily traffic (ADT) for the MEV calculation was estimated at each location by multiplying the existing PM peak hour TEV by ten, as PM peak hour traffic volumes typically represent approximately 10- percent of the ADT. Accident data was collected for the four study intersections nearest the site, as they will be impacted most significantly by project trips. The study intersections along Interurban Avenue S to the south of I -5 were analyzed for purposes of determining the arterial LOS only. Table 3. Accident History Summary Intersection Interurban Ave S/ Gateway Dr S_ Interurban Ave 5/ SR 599 NB Off-Ramp Interurban Ave S/ 48th Ave 5 Interurban Ave S/ I -5. 58 Off -Ramp 1. Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles As is shown in Table 2, the intersections of Interurban Avenue S /Gateway Drive S and Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S both have had 15 reported accidents occur between 2001 and 2003. The remaining intersections have had less than ten accidents reported over the last ten years. The four nearest study intersections all show an MEV rate of less than 1.0, which suggests that no unusual safety conditions exist. Number of Accidents 2001 2002 2003 3 4 8 2 { 4 8 1{ 3 Total Average/Year MEV' 0.57 The Transpo Group 1 04209.00\04209r1.doc 10 • 1 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Transit Service King County Metro transit provides transit service in the study area and near the project site. Metro Routes 124 and 154 provide service along Interurban Avenue S connecting the immediate area around the site with Allentown, Southcenter, Seattle, Kent, Auburn and other regional destinations. Bus stops are located near the intersections of Interurban Avenue S with 48th Avenue S and Gateway Drive S. Additional Metro routes make scheduled stops at the Interurban Park and Ride lot located to the south of the site near the intersection of Interurban Avenue S /52nd Avenue S. Based on existing transit opportunities, the site should be considered reasonably well served and accessible by transit. Non - Motorized Facilities Sidewalks, curb, and gutter are provided along the east side of Interurban Avenue S near the project site, while pedestrian access is restricted on the west side. Sidewalks are also provided along Gateway Drive S, the south side of S 133.1 Street, and the east side of 48th Avenue S. Sidewalks exist intermittently elsewhere in the site vicinity. Each of the signalized study area intersections provides pedestrian crosswalks, push buttons, and signal heads to facilitate pedestrian activity. The site is adequately served by the existing non - motorized facilities. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00\04209r1.doc 11 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Project Impacts This section documents the potential impacts of the proposed project on the study area roadways and intersections. It includes a summary of the project trip generation, distribution, future traffic volumes, and the potential impacts to traffic volumes, operations, transit, traffic safety, and non - motorized facilities. Trip Generation To determine the extent of the anticipated impact for the proposed project, trip generation was projected for the weekday PM peak hour. The Starbucks trip generation estimate is based on a trip generation study previously conducted specifically for Starbucks stores. This study was conducted by Transportation Engineers Northwest in 2002 at five Puget Sound area Starbucks locations. ITE Trip Generation, 76 Edition, was used to determine the total trip generation for the remaining uses. Trip rates identified for the Specialty Retail (ITE Land Use #810), and Fast -Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru (ITE Land Use #933) land uses were used. The ITE Tnp Generation Handbook does not provide pass -by rates for the Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru land use, so a related use: Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -Thru (ITE Land Use #934) was utilized. No pass -by rate is provided by ITE for Specialty Retail. To provide a conservative analysis, no pass -by rate was assumed for this portion of the site. In addition, no trip credit has been taken for the previous uses of this site. Table 4 shows the PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed project. Table 4.Project Trip Generation: PM Peak Hour LandiUse :Starbucks Coffee with Drive -thru Specialty Retail Fast Food without Drive -thru TOTAL. - -- a � Size (sf} 1,700 sf _2,650 sf 1,365 sf trip Rat e w. (per#10!000 sf) 33.891 2.713 26.155 58 422 7 —4 36 186 Total New' Trips �lre 16 7_ 18 4664:416410; ' NeNom! Inbound 8 8 NewTllij 'Outbound 8 10 22M 1. Total trip rate identified in the Starbucks Trip Generation Study, Transportation Engineers Northwest (2002) 2. Pass -by rate of 82% identified in Starbucks Trip Generation Study, Transportation Engineers Northwest (2002) 3. ITE Trip Generation (2004), Land Use #810 (Specialty Retail) 4. No pass -by trips were assumed for the specialty retail portion' of the site 5. ITE Trip Generation (2004), Land Use #933 (Fast Food Restaurant without Drive -Thru) 6. Pass -by rate of 50% used; ITE Trip Generation Handbook (2003), Land Use #934 (Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -thru) As is shown in Table 4, the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 40 new PM peak hour trips, and 60 pass -by trips. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of project trips to /from the project site was determined based on current travel patterns in the area and the anticipated market area for the uses identified within the current development plan. Prior to initiating the LOS analysis, the trip distribution was reviewed and approved by City Staff. The net -new project trips, for the PM peak hour, were The Transpo Group 104209.00'•_04209r1 .rinc: 12 • • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 then assigned to the study intersections based on the City approved trip distribution. The project trip distribution is shown in Figure 5, while the project trip assignment for the PM peak hour is shown in Figure 6. The resulting future with- project traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 7. Traffic Volume Impacts The traffic volumes associated with the proposed development were compared to the PM peak hour future with- project traffic forecasts to gauge the traffic volume impacts of the proposed project. The results of the traffic volume comparisons are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Project Traffic Volume Impacts- PM Peak Hour Study Intersection ' Interurban Ave /Gateway Dr S Interurban AveS /SR 599 NB Off -Ramp Interurban Ave S /48th Ave S [Interurban Ave 5/,I -5 SB Off- Ramp__ __ Interurban Ave 5/ 52nd Ave S Interurban Ave 5 /58th Ave S Interurban Ave S /Fort Dent Wy- I7405 SB Interurban Ave S /Southcenter Blvd I i- 1. Total new project trips entering the intersection 2. Total number of vehicles entering the intersection ew Project. Trips' 21 22 2010 Future with- Project2 2,661_ 2,102^ 1,954 15_!_ 13 2,503 10 ^2,795 3,681 17— Project Trip q, Percent Impact 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% As is shown in Table 5, the proposed project would impact each of the study intersections by 1- percent or less in 2010. The project's greatest impact is anticipated at those intersections adjacent to the site. As traffic volumes typically fluctuate within a range of ten - percent from day to day, the average motorist would not likely notice such impacts. Intersection Operations Intersection levels of service analyses were performed consistent with the methodologies described earlier in this report. Table 6 highlights the results of the LOS analysis conducted at the study area intersections for future with - project conditions. The results of the future baseline analysis have been included in the table for comparison purposes. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. The Transpo Group 104209.00;04209r1.doc 13 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND 0 = STUDY INTERSECTION X = PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT (NEW TRIPS ONLY) Figure 5 Project Trip Distribution /Assignment Interurban Retail M-104 04209 Interurban RelaillCraphics\grapric01 <A> brandonm 07/13/04 17.07 Transpo Group INTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST -GATEWAY OINTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF -RAMP 8N 1 12 OINTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S • 2 7 2 � N7 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -5 SB OFF -RAMP 7 N6 OINTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUE S 5 1> 5 00 J<<, - ,4 SITE �K i %1a oW f ' co A N NOT TO SCALE OINTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 2\N 2) OINTERURBAN AVE S 1.405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 3' 3 OINTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 12 14 (+4) (+10) rL ( +10) 16 ( -10) -6 1 LEGEND X = TOTAL TRIPS (X) = PASS -BY TRIPS soloc Figure 6 Project Trip Assignment - PM Peak Hour ■ Interurban Retail M:104`04209 Interurban Reta(\Graphics1grapnic01 <0> brandonm 07113104 17:08 Transpo Group OINTERURBAN AVE S S 133RD ST-GATEWAY 0 50 434 220 220 . .# 247 70' , X5262 70.y ,r. 567 257 263 2 INTERURBAN AVE S SR 599 NB OFF -RAMP 943 N 255 71 ~ 832 OINTERURBAN AVE S 48TH AVENUE S 77 107 807 G 140 155 667 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -5 SB OFF -RAMP 957 N 246 595 ~ 571 OINTERURBAN AVE S 56TH AVENUE S 15 1,210 136\ 5 •■■—• 5 r <5 86)x/ ■1/4.5 10 5 ,r. 925 70 30 N NOT TO SCALE OINTERURBAN AVE S 58TH AVE S 10 5 1,408 .� �- 5 72 >'■ r 5 67), -`10 5 .y ,r■ 1,063 70 75 OINTERURBAN AVE S 1 -405 SB RAMPS/ FORT DENT 75 45 938 35 110 .)'4, r/ 170 80 )J/ \\ 270 55 .y 773 435 695 OINTERURBAN AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD 306 766 891 '- U 915 301 . r// 285 216 ?re ` 475 800 ---,,k. ,rte 806 230 150 23 42 r t. 31 904 —► Shared Driveway Volumes` 4-14 807 88 25 rL. 86 —J 860 —► 'NOTE: VOLUMES INCLUDE EXISTING TRAFFIC THAT SHARE THE DRIVEWAYS 11 Figure 7 Future (2006) With- Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Interurban Retail M:\04104209 Interurban RdlaillGrap!tslgraphic01 <E> brar:donm 07/1010417.08 k_ 41 .-734 The Transpo Group • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Table 6. Future Without- Project and Future with- Project LOS Summary- Peak Hour 'Interurban Ave 5/ 'Gateway Dr Interurban Ave 5/ i� A • 1511599, NB Off-Ramp L 'Interurban Ave S/ !48th Ave S ;Interurban Ave S/ I -5 SB Off -Ramp Interurban Ave S/ 52nd Ave S Interurban Ave 5/ 58th Ave S 2010•Euture without - Project LOS�iw" C ' Delay2 v /ca B 23.0 j 0.65 j 7.3 PM 2010 futur=e with - Project 4 M LOSIrr De lay v/c C 23.1 11 0.66 „ " 7.3 f, 0.48 16.0 0.64 A 26.7 • 6.0 0.70 0.56 11.3 • 0.73 !Interurban Ave S/. i1 i; Fort Dent Wy- I -405 j ; E 71.2 I; 1.06 j {Interurban Ave S/ i' i 1, 11 F 109.7 ! 1.26 !I" Southcenter Blvd i , . ! I _ .. 1. Level of Service 2. Average vehicle delay in seconds 3. Volume to capacity ratio A B 6.0 11.4 ! 0.73 71.6 • 1.06 .) i 110.0 ( 1.26 As is shown in Table 6, all of the study intersections are anticipated to operate under the with- project scenario at the same LOS as in baseline conditions. The average vehicle delay at each intersection increases by less than one second with the addition of project traffic. The study intersections nearest the site continue to operate at LOS C or better in 2010 future with- project conditions. Arterial Operations Arterial segment level of service analysis was performed consistent with the methodologies described earlier in this report. Table 7 shows the results of the LOS analysis conducted for the Interurban Avenue arterial segment for future (2010) with- project conditions. The results of the future baseline (2010) analysis have been included in the table for comparison purposes. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. Table 7. Future with- Project and Future with - Project Arterial LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour Arterial Segment Future Without- Project Conditions Speed, ;Interurban Avenue: f • I -5 to I -405 18.2 LOS 1. Average of northbound and southbound travel speeds Future with- Project Conditions Speed, 18.1 LOS As is shown in Table 7, the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment would continue to operate at LOS C with the addition of project traffic, decreasing in average speed by one tenth The Transpo Group 1 04209.0004209r1.doc 17 • Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Site Access Analysis Unsignalized driveway LOS analyses were conducted using Synchro 5.0, which is based on 2000 HCM unsignalized intersection methodologies. Traffic volumes were developed at the site access locations based on turning movement counts conducted in June 2004 at the two shared private driveways that connect with Interurban Avenue S. The total project trips (new plus pass -by), were assigned to the existing driveway volumes generated by the other neighboring uses that share these driveways. The two -way center left -turn lane on Interurban Avenue S provides a refuge by which vehicles making a westbound left turn from either driveway can use in order to complete the turn in two stages depending on the timing of gaps in traffic on Interurban Avenue S. This two -stage gap process is possible without conflict from other turns as the driveways do not have an opposing approach to the west. The two -stage gap use was assumed in the reported driveway LOS analysis. The driveway LOS results are presented in Table 8. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. Table 8. Driveway LOS Summary- PM Peak Hour Shared Site Driveway r .. Interurban Avenue 5/ North Shared Site Driveway Interurban Avenue S/ !South Shared Site Driveway 1. _ Level of Service 2. Average delay per vehicle in seconds 3. Worst Movement at the intersection (highest amount of delay) LOS' C Delay 22.7 22.4 WorsrMvmf Westbound Left Turn Westbound Left Turn As shown in Table 8, the results of the analysis indicate that both driveways would likely operate at LOS C in future with- project conditions. This analysis focuses on the PM peak hour which generally represents the highest outbound volumes for uses adjacent. Non - Motorized Facilities Pedestrian facilities currently exist in the area and adjacent to the site which will support the connection of the site to available transit service, both existing and future. These facilities include a sidewalk along the east side of Interurban Avenue S, which connects to other sidewalks and leads to designated transit stops in the area. Parking As currently proposed, the project will provide 58 parking stalls in an on -site, paved surface parking lot. City of Tukwila Parking Code requires 58 stalls for this site, which is met by the proposed supply. A parking demand analysis was also completed to determine the adequacy of the parking supply. Using Parking Generation (ITE, 2nd Edition), weekday peak parking generation rates were developed for the site. For the Starbucks portion of the site, the average peak parking rate for ITE land use #836 (Fast Food with Drive -In Window) was used, while ITE land use #837 (Fast Food Without Drive -In Window) was used for the Quiznos portion of the site. The peak parking demand for the balance of the development was determined using ITE land use #820 (Shopping Center), as no parking rates are provided for ITE land use #810 (Specialty Retail). The Shopping Center land use classification is the closest related land -use to Specialty Retail. Table 9 shows the results of the parking demand analysis. The Transpo Group 104209.00\04209r1 cloc 18 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Table 9. Peak Parking Demand: Weekday Peak Conditions Land Use Size (sfl* Pak- Paking Rate'? +(per 1,000 sf) Peak Parking Dernand (Parking Stalls)`' • Starbucks Coffee with Drive -thru ; 1,700 sf i 9.95' • L 17 Specialty Retail (Shopping Center)' . t 2,650 sf 3.23' t 9 • Fast Food without Drive-thru 1,365 sf 11.68' 16 Total Peak Demand 42 Total Parking Supply Parking Surplus' 58 +16 1. Average Peak Rate; Parking Generation (ITE, 2' Edition), Land Use #836 (Fast Food with Drive -In Window) 2. Average Peak Rate; Parking Generation (ITE, 2' Edition), Land Use #820 (Shopping Center); Note: no Specialty Retail parking rates are provided by ITE. 3. Average Peak Rate: Parking Generation (ITE, 2'" Edition), Land Use #837 (Fast Food without Drive -in Window) As is shown in Table 9, the proposed project's practical parking capacity would provide a surplus of ten parking stalls during the peak weekday period, adequately accommodating the peak parking demand. Traffic Safety Impacts Given the minimal level of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed project, combined with the operational impacts summarized previously for the study area intersections, this project is not likely to adversely impact the operational safety of the roadways or intersections within the defined study area. The previous safety analysis included in this report identified no existing safety deficiencies to which the project would impact. Transportation Impact Fees The City of Tukwila has established transportation impact fees in TMC 9.48.140. The current transportation impact fee schedule identifies ten improvement projects throughout the city. Developments that generate trips that impact any one of these projects by five or more trips must pay a fee per trip. Based on the project trip distribution and assignment noted in Figures 5 and 6 and the anticipated local nature of project trips, only one of the projects currently identified in the impact fee schedule is impacted by five or more project trips. The Interurban Bridge widening project will widen the bridge to allow dual left turn lanes. The per trip fee for this improvement project is $240, equating to a total impact fee for this project of approximately $1,440. The Transpo Group 1 04209.00\04209r1.doc 19 • 1 Interurban Retail, Tukwila, WA DRAFT July 2004 Summary /Conclusions The proposed project would consist of a single 5,700 -sf (approximate) retail building to be located on the east side of Interurban Avenue S between the intersections of Interurban Avenue S /Gateway Drive S and Interurban Avenue S /48th Avenue S. The retail building will include approximately 1,700 sf of space for a Starbucks Coffee shop with drive -thru window, approximately 1,365 sf for a fast food restaurant without drive -thru, and 2,650 sf of specialty retail space. Access to the site is proposed via two existing shared private driveways located on the east and west sides of the site. The site is currently vacant, though it formerly was the site of a gas station and convenience market. No trip credit has been taken, assuring a conservative analysis and estimate of potential project impacts. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 100 total trips during the PM peak hour, with approximately 40 considered new to the area, and 60 considered pass -by trips. The scope of the analysis was coordinated with City of Tukwila Staff. The following summarizes the key points of the analysis. • Future baseline analyses incorporated general increases in background growth. The results of the analysis indicated that the signalized off -site study intersections adjacent to the site on Interurban Avenue S are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour, while the intersections on the far southern end of the arterial segment would operate at LOS E or F. However, the Interurban Avenue arterial segment is expected to operate at LOS C overall during the PM peak hour. • Based on the future baseline traffic volumes and the project trip assignment, the proposed project is expected to increase traffic volumes by 1 percent or less in the PM peak hour. • The with - project levels of service indicate that the off -site signalized study intersections are expected to operate at the same LOS as in baseline conditions. Delay at the off -site study intersections are anticipated to either remain the same or increase by less than one second per average vehicle. The LOS for the Interurban Avenue S arterial segment is projected to operate at LOS C in the future under with - project conditions, meeting the City's LOS E standard. • Analyses of the site access points indicate that the two shared private access driveways would operate at LOS C in the future under with- project conditions. • Overall traffic volumes are expected to increase by 1- percent or less during the PM peak period as a result of the project, thus not significantly increasing traffic volumes within the area beyond what the future transportation network can accommodate. This minor increase in traffic volumes is not anticipated to affect overall safety within the study area. • The proposed project's parking supply of 58 stalls adequately accommodates the peak parking demand projected for the site. • No transportation mitigation, above the payment of the standard Transportation Impact Fees previously noted, has been identified for this project. The Transpo Group 104209.00 \ 04209r1 cloc 20 • Appendix A: Highway Capacity Manual (2000): Level of Service Criteria and Definitions • 1 Appendix B Level of Service Worksheets CONOCOPHILLIPS CORPORATION GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT Site No.: 6237 Address: ConocoPhillips Site Manager: Consultant/Contact Person: Primary Agency /Regulatory ID No. DATE: August 7, 2003 13038 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington Timothy D. Johnson Environmental Resolutions, Inc. /James S. Matthiessen : Washington State Department of Ecology WORK PERFORMED THIS QUARTER(S) [Third - 2003]: • Monitored, purged, and sampled 3 groundwater monitoring wells WORK PROPOSED FOR NEXT QUARTER [Fourth - 2003]: • Monitor, purge, and sample 3 groundwater monitoring wells SUMMARY: Frequency of Sampling Events: Approximate Depth to Groundwater: Groundwater Gradient: Maximum TPH -G /Benzene Concentrations: Measurable Free Product Detected: Free Product Recovered This Quarter: Cumulative Free Product Recovered to Date: Bulk Soil Removed This Quarter: Water Wells or Surface Waters w /in 2,000 ft: Radius and Respective Direction: Current Remedial Action: Permits for Discharge: Quarterly 13to14ft Northerly 0.003 ft/ft 100/1.46 No None Unknown None Green /Duwamish River. 1,300 ft, East None None RECEIVED ENV ;RGNi' ENT L DEPARTMENT NORTHWEST REGION (Quarterly, etc.) (Measured Feet) (Direction) (Magnitude) (PPb) (Yes - ID well(s) /No) (Gallons) (Gallons) (Cubic yards) (Distance & Direction) (SVE /AS /P &T, etc.) (NPDES, POTW, etc.) DISCUSSION: • MW 3 contained TPH -D and.TPH -O concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels. • The official laboratory report notes the results in the diesel organic range are primarily due to overlap from a heavy oil range product. ATTACHMENTS: Plate 1: Groundwater Sample Analysis Map — 07/03/03 Table 1: Groundwater Analytical Results Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation Field Data Records Prepared By: t t,c 6 Yukiko Noguchi Staff Scientist cc: LUST Coordinator, Washington State D Mr. Steve Boss, Afton Properties Reviewed By: ional Office John Meyer, R.G. Branch Manager 31027.13.Q033 - - -- -- - -s -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -� -- -- -- - -1 MW1 10/01/02 01/06/03 04/09/03 07/03/03 <100 <50.0 <5,000 71.9 279 <250 11,000 <250 <500 <600 1,130 <500 <0.600 0.805 <50.0 1.48 <2.00 1.62 <60.0 6.27 <1.00 <0.500 <60.0 2.63 <1.50 1.83 <100 13.3 MW2 82 96 FORMER STATION BUILDING MW4 /MW4A 83.00 10/01/02 01/06/03 04/09/03 07 /03/03 295 203 221 100 552 <250 272 386 <802 <600 <500 <600 11.8 3.04 5.47 1.22 <2.00 0.689 5.28 1.83 3.19 1.09 0.904 1.22 13.1 4.24 8.7 8.17 L SOITRCC Modified from a m•p prorlded D7 CooeeoPNSlpe Corpor&Uoo Former Underground Storage Tank r -T1 E r-ir-1 V 1 1 11 1 LJ L4- -1 1-- --1- - -1 Lr- 7 - -IF - T - -1 1 1 11 1 1 L 1 11 1 1 I 11 I L _ JL _ J Underground Storage Tank MW3 83.06 10/01/02 01/06/03 04/09/03 07/03/03 <100 <50.0 <500 <50.0 <250 <250 <250 383 <500 <500 <500 888 0.507 <0.500 <5.00 <0.500 <2.00 0.848 <5.00 0.585 <1.00 <0.500 <6.00 <0.500 <1.50 1.75 <10.0 1.08 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH ._J APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 30 60 FICET FN 31027.13 EXPLANATION MW3 Groundwater Monitoring Well 84.55 Groundwater Elevation MW1 Destroyed Groundwater Monitoring Well 11/25/97 466 810 <750 <0.500 <0.500 1.14' 38.9 Laboratory Results in ug /L (ppb) Sample Date Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Oil Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Numbers in Red Exceed MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels <1.00 = Less than the Stated Laboratory Reporting Limit • ENVIRONMENTAL �.. RESOLUTIONS. AMC. GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS MAP - 07/03/03 TOSCO SITE NO. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South .Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. 31027 PLATE 1 7N: 07/24/03 TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Tosco Site No. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Page 1 of 2 Well Name Sample Date DTW GW Elev. TPH -G TPH -D TPH -O B T E X M W 1 02/15/90 -- -- -- - .13 . <0 5 <0.5 13 96.58 01/21/93 12.09 84.49 <100 <500 -- 0.6 1.6 <0.5. 11 11/25/97 12.11 84.47 102 523 <750 1.18 0.894 <0.5 4.78 10/20/98 13.78 82.80 <50.0 <250 <750 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/21/99 14.15 82.43 81.4 <250 <750 1.39 4.83 1.83 7.59 10/13/00 13.89 82.69 <50.0 349 <1,010 <0.900 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/19/01 14.94 81.64 <50.0 <250 <500 1.20 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 01/31/02 Destroyed MW2 02/15/90 -- -- -- - ;1 00 ;.t <0.5 96.47 01/21/93 12.01 84.46 190 <500 -- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 11/25/97 11.93 84.54 200 764 <750 <0.5 0.650 <0.5 '2.99 10/20/98 13.71 82.76 '.3'5319,"!.:' 1280;::1 <750 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/21/99 14.11 82.36 129 <470 <1,410 1.47 6.43 2.38 10.2 10/13/00 13.75 82.72 113 347 - <750 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/19/01 13.76 82.71 59.6 345 <585 <0.500 <0.500 0.562 1.25 1" -r. 7":rm: �':'Y^j}?(. 01/31/02 11.25 85.22 ',:13 ' , •'e1;580_'�;;; ? .672; . ?i' 0.714 1.01 <0.500 7.10 04/30/02 11.75 84.72 ?,.; .59.7 <250 <500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 1.35 07/01/02 12.85 83 62 •,135'4_ ; ? °: 3;180 ". 1 <500 0 525 <0.500 <0.500 1.97 10/01/02 13.73 82.74 <100 279 <500 <0.500 <2.00 <1.00 <1.50 01 /06/03 11.78 84.69 <50.0 <250 <500 0.805 1.62 <0.500 1.83 .', 00 •1-va:`f? <50.0 <50.0 <50.0 <100 04/09/03 11.75 84.72 <5,000 ;:;11 000• :,•,x;130' °; 07/03/03 13.51 82.96 71.9 <250 <500 1.46 5.27 2.63 13.3 MW3 02/15/90 -- -- -- - 2.0 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 96.61 01/21/93 12.00 84.61 <100 <500 -- <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 11/25/97 12.06 84.55 <50 575 <750 <0.5 0.763 <0.5 1.03 10/20/98 13.81 82.80 <50.0 748 <750 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/21/99 . 14.17 82.44 160 302 m. <750 4.27 15.9 5.60 x:.:21;94;;, 10/13/00 13.85 82.76 <50.0 i144,520..,; <750 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 10/19/01 13.90 82.71 <50.0 550 <603 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <1.00 NE 01/31/02' 10.71 -- <50.0 <250 <500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 1.27 96.47 04/30/02 9.67 86.80 <50.0 <250 <500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 1.46 07/01/02 10.80 85.67 <50.0 577 <500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500r 1.57 10/01/02 1.67 94.80 <100 <250 <500 0.507 <2.00 <1.00 <1.50 01/06/03 6.82 89.65 <50.0 <250 <500 <0.500 0.846 <0.500 1.75 04/09/03 9.59 86.88 <500 <250 <500 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <10.0 • 07/03/03 13.41 83.06 <50.0 .383 ,° ?' 866' .. <0 500 0.585 <0.500 1.06 MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels 1,000' 5 40 30 20 Continued on page 2 3t027.13.xis TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Tosco Site No. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington Page2of2 Well Name Sample Date DTW GW Elev. TPH -G TPH -D TPH -O B T E X MW4 02/15/90 • -- - 97.18 01/21/93 12.08 85.10 ;, 600' s ;' 800,, ,:.: -- 11/25/97 10.87 86.31 ''i , 466s q 810,. <750 10/20/98 12.91 84.27 ' 294, 4; .x.730 r <750 10/21/99 13.47 83.71 :" "808;: ?' .� ;431 <750 10/13/00 13.67 . 83.51 q.183`: .11,000:. • <3,750 <0.500 10/19/01 13.19 83.99 43224'. r.;{ • 1;180" :. <576 i;.:; 9:80... 01/31/02 Obstructed -- Damaged during excavation; reinstalled as MW4A 1.9 06 <0.5 <0.500 MW4A 04/30/02 11.99 84.86 96.85 07/01/02 13.26 83.59 10/01/02 14.10 82.75 01/06/03" 12.42 84.43 04/09/03 12.24 84.61 07/03/03 13.85 83.00 174 320: ,n 295 203 221 100 <250 <500 756 <562 I. 552 <602 1' <250 <500 3.04 272 <500 366 <500 1.22 4.67 1.1 1.2 <0.5 <0.500 ;99;8r 0571 1.99 0.563 0.518 <2.00 0.669 5.26 1.83 3.7 1.0 114 0.986 27.6 0.926 6.64 0.593 1.87 3.19 ' 1.09 0 904 1.22 5.13 10.3 13.1 4.24 6.70 6.17 MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels 1,000' 5 40 30 20 EXPLANATION: All concentrations are in ug/L (ppb). Wellhead elevations were taken from prior consultants reports. Wellhead elevation of MW4A was taken from ERI survey dated 04/25/02. DTW = Depth to water in feet below top of casing GW Elev. = Groundwater elevation relative to top of casing elevation TPH -G = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline by Ecology Method NWTPH-Gx. TPH -D and TPH-0 = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel and Oil, respectively, by Ecology Method NWTPH -Dx B = Benzene: T = Toluene; E = Ethylbenzene: X = Total Xylenes BTEX = Aromatic compounds by EPA Method 8021 B - = Not Analyzed or Sampled < = Less than the stated laboratory reporting limit Shaded values equal or exceed MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons *Top of casing was broken during remedial excavation, has since been resurveyed. "MW4A was identified as MW4 on chain of custody, official laboratory report, and field log. Data collected before 11/25/97 were taken from prior consultants. 31027.13.xIs 18 July_2003 nca. www.ncalabs.caw John Meyer ERI 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 RE: TOSCO #6237/Tukwila Seattle 11720 North Creek N, Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011 -8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 Spokane East 11115 Montgomery, Suite 8, Spokane, WA 99206 -4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 Portland 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Emplre Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 Anchorage 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502 -1119 907.563.9200 fax 907.563.9210 Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 07/03/03 16:20. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel fred to contact me. Sincerely, Amar Gill Project Manager 4:1411 www.acalabs.00m scam Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek , Sulte 400, Bothell, WA 98011 -8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206.4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502-1119 907,163,9200 tax907 .563,9210 ERI 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project: TOSCO #6237/Tukwila Project Number: 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reported: 07/18/03 09:47 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES ISample ID MW2 MW3 MW4a Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received B3G0147 -01 B3G0147 -02 B3G0147 -03 Water Water Water 07/03/03 12:00 07/03/03 12:00 07/03/03 12:00 07/03/03 16:20 07/03/03 16:20 07/03/03 16:20 North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 1 of 7 • O ncaM www.noalabs.00m Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek • N, Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011-8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206.4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502-1119 9075519200 fa x_907.5632210 ERI 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project: TOSCO #6237/Tukwila Project Number: 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reporttd: 07/18/03 09:47 Gasoline Hydrocarbons (Benzene to Naphthalene) and BTEX by NWTPH -G and EPA 8021B North Creek Analytical - Bothell Analyte Reporting Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes 111W2 (B3G0147 -01) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 71.9 50.0 ug/1 1 3G14003 07/14/03 07/14/03 NWTPH- Gx/8021B Gasoline Range Ilydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (FID) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (PID) 1.46 0.500 5.27 0.500 2.63 0.500 13.3 1.00 • 91.7 % 62 -127 96.5 % 72 -127 • 11fW3 (B3G0147 -02) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons ND 50.0 ug/1 1 3G14003 07/14/03 07/14/03 NWTPH-Gx/802IB Benzene ND 0.500 • " Toluene 0.585 0.500 " Ethylbenzene ND 0.500 " " Xylenes (total) 1.06 1.00 " Surrogate: 4 -BFB (FID) 91.5 % 62 -127 If It " Surrogate: 4 -BFB (PID) 97.5 % 72 -127 " " " 111W4a (B3G0147 -03) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons 100. 50.0 ug/1 1 3G14003 07/14/03 07/14/03 NWTPH- G,/802IB Benzene 1.22 0.500 " " Toluene 1.83 0.500 " " Ethylbenzene 1.22 0.500 " Xylenes (total) 6.17 1.00 " Surrogate: 4 -BFB (FID) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (PID) 94.0 % 62 -127 102 % 72 -127 to 0 North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 2 of 7 • fl1,TM www.ncelabs. com Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek , Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011 -8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206 -4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Emplre Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502 -1119 90L563.92Q0 fax 907563.9210 ERI 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project: TOSCO 116237/Tukwila Project Number: 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reported: 07/18/03 09:47 Semivolatile Petroleum Products by NWTPH -Dx with Acid /Silica Gel Clean -up North Creek Analytical - Bothell Reporting Result Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes MW2 (B3G0147 -01) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons Lube Oil Range Hydrocarbons Surrogate: 2 -FBP Surrogate: Octacosane ND 0.250 mg/I ND 0.500 50.3 % 50 -150 52.1 % 50 -150 1 3G06004 07/06/03 07/08/03 NWTPH -Dx 11fW3 (B3G0147 -02RE1) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 0.383 0.250 mg/I 1 3G10011 07/10/03 07/11/03. NWTPH -Dx D-09 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons Lube Oil Range IIydrocarbons Surrogate: 2 -FBP Surrogate: Octacosane 0.866 0.500 64.2 % 50 -150 62.0 % 50 -150 111W4a (B3G0147- 03RE1) Water Sampled: 07/03/03 12:00 Received: 07/03/03 16:20 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 0.366 0.250 mg/I I 3GI0011 07/10/03 07/11/03 NWTPH -Dx Lube Oil Range Hydrocarbons ND 0.500 " 84.0 % 50 -150 II II " It 69.2 % 50 -150 Surrogate: 2 -FBP Surrogate: Octacosane North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report mast be reproduced in its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 3 of 7 Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011 -8244 425.420.9200 fax 42 20.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206-4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502-1119 997.563.2200 fax 397,563.9210 ERI 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project: TOSCO 116237/Tukwila Project Number: 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reported: 07/18/03 09:47 Gasoline Hydrocarbons (Benzene t o Naphthalene) and BTEX by NWTPH -G and EPA 8021B - Quality Control North Creek Analytical - Bothell Analyte Reporting Result Limit Spike Source %REC RPD Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 3G14003: Prepared 07/14/03 Blank (3G14003 -BLK1) Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) Using EPA 5030B (P/T) ND ND ND ND ND 50.0 ug/1 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 Surrogate: 4 -BFB (F1D) Surrogate. 4 -BFB (P1D) LCS (3G14003 -BSI) Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) 38.4 46.4 48.0 80.0 62 -127 48.0 96.7 72 -127 442 6.19 33.3 8.56 40.6 50.0 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 ug/1 500 6.65 37.0 8.55 43.0 88.4 93.1 90.0 100 94.4 80 -120 80 -120 80 -120 80 -120 80 -120 Surrogate: 4 -BFB (F1D) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (P1D) LCS Dup (3G14003 -BSD1) Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) 46.1 45.6 48.0 48.0 96.0 62 -127 95.0 72 -127 475 6.77 35.2 9.21 43.3 50.0 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 500 6.65 37.0 8.55 43.0 95.0 102 95.1 108 101 80-120 80 -120 80 -120 80 -120 80 -120 7.20 25 8.95 40 5.55 40 7.32 40 6.44 40 Surrogate: 4 -BFB (F1D) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (P1D) Matrix Spike (3G14003 -MS1) Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) 47.3 45.7 48.0 98.5 62 -127 48.0 95.2 72 -127. Source: B3G0247 -02 439 6.32 33.8 8.68 40.8 50.0 0.500 0.500 0.500 1.00 ug/1 500 6.65 37.0 8.55 43.0 11.1 85.6 72 -119 0.301 0.127 0.410 0.496 90.5 91.0 96.7 93.7 70 -129 73 -114 82 -120 74 -118 Surrogate: 4 -BFB (HD) Surrogate. 4 -BFB (P1D) 46.0 45.4 48.0 48.0 95.8 62 -127 94.6 72 -127 North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in Its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 4 of 7 nca www.ncalabs.oam Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek 14, Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011-8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206 - 4776. 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502 -1119 907563,9200 fax_9_97,563,9210 ER1 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project: TOSCO #6237/Tukwila Project Number. 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reported: 07/18/03 09:47 Gasoline Hydrocarbons (Benzene to Naphthalene) and BTEX by NWTPH -G and EPA 8021B - Quality Control North Creek Analytical - Bothell Analyte Reporting Result Limit Spike Units Level Source %REC RPD Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 3G14003: Prepared 07/14/03 Matrix Spike Dup (3614003 -MSD1) Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes (total) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (FJD) Surrogate: 4 -BFB (PJD) Using EPA 5030B (P/r) Source: B3G0247 -02 441 6.42 34.3 8.71 40.7 50.0 ug/I 0.500 0.500 0.500 I.00 500 6.65 37.0 8.55 43.0 11.1; 0.301 0.127 0.410 0.496 86.0 92.0 92.4 97.1 93.5 72 -119 70 -129 73 -114 82 -120 74 -118 0.455 25 1.57 40 1.47 40 0.345 40 0.245 40 46.8 45.3 48.0 97.5 48.0. 94.4 62 -127 72 -127 North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Environmental Laboratory Network Page 5 of 7 www.ncalabs.com Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek , Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011-8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206 -4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008 -7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Sulte F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W Intematlonal Alrport Road, Sulte A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502 -1119 997 563,9200 fax 907563.9210 ER1 815 Industry Dr Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project; TOSCO #6237/Tukwila Project Number: 031027 Project Manager: John Meyer Reported: 07/18/03 09:47 Semivolatile Petroleum Products by NWTPH -Dx with Acid /Silica Gel Clean -up - Quality Control North Creek Analytical - Bothell Analyte Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 3G06004: Prepared 07/06/03 Using EPA 3520C Blank (3G06004 -BLK1) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons Lube Oil Range Hydrocarbons ND 0.250 mg/I ND 0.500 Surrogate: 2 -FBP Surrogate: Octacosane LCS (3G06004 -BS1) 0.255 0.156 0.320 79.7 50 -150 0.160 97.5 50 -150 Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 1.88 0.250 mg/I 2.00 94.0 45 -105 Surrogate: 2-FBP 0.251 0.320 78.4 50 -150 LCS Dup (3G06004 -BSD1) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 2.01 0.250 2.00 100 45 -105 6.68 50 . Surrogate: 2-FBP 0.287 " 0.320 89.7 50 -150 Batch 3G10011: Prepared 07/10/03 Using EPA 3520C Blank (3G10011-BLK1) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons ND 0.250 ml Lube Oil Range Hydrocarbons . ND 0.500 Surrogate: 2-FBP 0.204 0.320. 63.8 50 -150 Surrogate: Octacosane 0.138 0.160 86.2 50 -150 LCS (3G10011 -BS1) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 1.64 0.250 mg/1 2.00 82.0 45 -105 Surrogate: 2-FBP 0.251 0.320 78.4 50 -150 LCS Dup (3G10011 -BSD1) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 1.64 0.250 mg/I 2.00 82.0 45. -105 0.00 50 Surrogate: 2-FBP 0.252 0.320 .78.8 50 -150 North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analyt/ cal, Inc. • Environmental Laboratory Network Page 6 of 7 4".11 www.ncalabs.00m ncam Seattle Spokane Portland Bend Anchorage 11720 North Creek , Suite 400, Bothell, WA 98011 -8244 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 99206 -4776 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 20332 Empire Avenue, Sulte F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 541.383.9310 fax 541.382.7588 2000 W International Airport Road, Suite A -10, Anchorage, AK 99502 -1119 907.563.97.00 fax 907.5619210 ERI Project: TOSCO #6237/Tukwila 815 Industry Dr Project Number: 031027 Reported: Tukwila, WA/USA 98188 Project Manager: John Meyer 07/18/03 09:47 Notes and Definitions D -09 Results in the diesel organics range are primarily due to overlap Gom'a heavy oil range product. DET Analyte DETECTED ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit NR Not Reported dry Sample results reported on a dry weight basis RPD Relative Percent DilTerence North Creek Analytical - Bothell The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of . custody document. This analytical report must 6e reproduced in in entirety. Amar Gill, Project Manager North Creek Analytical, Inc. Page 7 of 7 Environmental Laboratory Network e ' Q?ne,a77A "Ire AsokMMm! kn. bri smos /ttlwrawy*two?* wwvueaiKaeat 11720 North Creek Pkwy N, Suite 400, Bothell, WA 980114223 East 11115 Montgomery, Suite B, Spokane, WA 98206-4776 9405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue, Beaverton, Oft 97008 -7132 20332 Empire Avenue, Suite F -1, Bend, OR 97701 -5711 TOSCO CHAIN OF CUSTODY REPORT 8;66 Fisaty Number 6 Z3i- SiteAddress: a.3 1 'J4 t-6M &11 - City, State, ZIP: Project/AWO Code Tosco Manager: `rt,vr�, FACILITY TYPE: ' (check one) El BP/(g) 0 Terminal/Bulk Plant 0 Brown Bear Ca Forrner 76 Site ❑ Other (425) 420 -9200 (509) 924 -9200 (503) 906-9200 (541) 383 -9310 • project, 03ioZi- Address: $ Is �- 7L, ) Cftt R3i8& Phone: ZtYe 6"-S-672:2-€1,4 Fax: K 6'/( Project Manager. t0ihr... Yu E-mail: Sample Collection by: FAX 420.9210 FAX 924 -9290 FAX 9064210 FAX 382 -7588 Quality Asswance Data Level: GO LI A: Standard Summary B: Standard + Chromatograms Laboratory T\>tnaround Days: 1" CDCILD. 10 Day - Standard . White - Laboratory Yellow - Coewltaot Photocopy - Ttwo 3, °`NID ' 0 OR 0 WA 0 AR $ 3 W Series 0 ID ° • • SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE 1t4IME (W S,O AOF ' TAINERS �� P • e v P _iA 5+ SA is w P c5 F 6.840 P al W P 16 F Halogen. Volatiles 1 EPA 8021 } ��?" w GC./MS Volatilcs EPA 8260 ? i,x,..uvl �� �i a0 nQ. q o TCLP or RCRA Metals (8L J NCA SAMPLE NUMBER 1. mw2 /-i s ( mss 5 ). iC K 0� )3 &O NI- -0/ • D Z_. iw3 5 3.mwLi� 5 It a 4. • • , 6. 7. . 8. a i➢ 9. . R • i, • ` l — F1r'm: 1 to & Time J • calved ,.... .. _ , A Lt . F11lml: o & Time . c,• 63 15:as Pii Comment= . � _ 3 b • 0 N. 3. ` Page, f of Co co.= Rer. Toe33.1/99 . White - Laboratory Yellow - Coewltaot Photocopy - Ttwo 3, °`NID Client Name: Location: Field Crew: GROUNDWATER SAMPLING - FIELD LOG 2 ER! Job No.CS/62- Field. Cleaning Performed: Analysis: Date: 9-13! 03. Page of Case Volume (d,,,. • X F 'where F • .0.163 for a 2" inside diameter well cast 0.652 for a 4" inside diameter welt castn 1.467 fora 6" inside diameter well castn i I. • ett o. • Time Depth Depth. Case Case Purge Water Well Dia. Vol* Vol. (ft.) (ft.) On) gal (940 )351 /9 z .9 21' Conduct. gS /CM. (X1000) Tertp. pH TURD.. P10 Deg' F NTU • PPM 13,Li t 2. Z 1 3 • • • Comments o /9104/red c. r G I imiumisammummammor Revised 41 / ERI ENVIRONMENTAL RESOLUTIONS, INC. Mr. Timothy D. Johnson Tosco Corporation 3977 Leary Way NW Seattle, Washington 98107 Subject: RECEIVED MAY 20u?: ENVIRONMENTAL ORTHWEST REGION DEPARTMENT Underground Storage Tank Decommissioning and Remedial Excavation, Tosco Site No. 6237, 13038 Interurban Avenue, Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Johnson: April 25, 2002 3102732.R03 In accordance with your request, Environmental Resolutions, Inc. (ERI) has prepared this letter report presenting results of underground storage tank (UST) decommissioning and remedial excavation activities at the site referenced above. Underground storage tank decommissioning and remedial excavation services were provided by Cowlitz Clean Sweep. of Longview, Washington (CCS). Site Description This site is located approximately 0.25 miles northwest of Interstate 5 in a mixed commercial and light industrial area in Tukwila, Washington. The site elevation is approximately 25 feet above mean sea level. The Duwamish River is located approximately 0.5 miles to the northeast. Historically, groundwater has been present approximately 10 to 15 feet below ground surface (bgs) in four on -site monitoring wells. The site location is shown on Plate 1. Prior to November 2001, the site had operated as a retail gasoline service station. In November 2001, the station building and canopies were demolished, and above - ground fuel dispensing facilities removed in preparation for UST decommissioning. Plate 2 is a site plan showing the station configuration prior to equipment demolition and removal. Review of a site drawing provided by Tosco Corporation indicates an additional pump island was formerly present near the northern portion of the station building prior to 1978. A copy of the General Arrangement drawing dated July 30, 1969, is attached. UST Decommissioning and Remedial Excavation On November 30, 2001, ERI personnel visited the site to observe decommissioning and removal of two 12,000- gallon, double - walled, fiberglass -clad steel, gasoline USTs, and one 550- gallon, single - walled, fiberglass -clad steel, waste oil UST. Following removal, the USTs appeared in good condition with minor pitting and no apparent holes. Some oil- stained soil was observed near the waste oil UST location following removal of the UST. Soil samples were subsequently collected from the excavation bottom and sidewalls, and submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil sample locations and laboratory results are shown on Plate 3. An UST Decommissioning Checklist is attached. Between November 30 and December 7, 2001, ERI personnel returned to the site to observe removal of underground product piping and excavation of apparent hydrocarbon - impacted soil from the UST and pump island areas. During excavation, two hydraulic hoists were removed from the area of the former station building. Soil samples were then collected beneath the product piping locations and at the limits of remedial excavation and submitted for laboratory analysis. Soil sample locations and laboratory results are shown on Plate 4. 815 Industry Drive, Tukwila, WA 98188 206- 575 -6220 • Novato • Lake Forest • Tukwila r AR13102732R03 Tows Site NQ. 6237. Tukwila, Washington Mnil 25.2002 Between December 12 and 19, 2001, ERI personnel returned to the site to observe additional overexcavation of hydrocarbon - impacted soil, and to collect samples at the limits of excavation. Groundwater monitoring well MW 1 was destroyed and removed during excavation (Plate 4).. Soil Sample Collection Soil encountered during excavation was screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionization detector (PID). Soil samples were then collected from the excavation bottom, sidewalls, and soil stockpile, transferred into laboratory- supplied glass containers, placed into an iced cooler, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. Soil encountered consisted of imported sand and gravel fill within the UST excavation and product piping trenches, underlain by silty sand to sandy silt with some clay and gravel stringers to approximately 10 to 12 feet bgs. The silty sand and sandy silt was in tum underlain by organic peat to the maximum depth explored of 15 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered during excavation. Laboratory Analysis The soil samples were transported to the North Creek Analytical, Inc. laboratory in Bothell, Washington for analysis. Selected soil samples collected from the product piping and UST excavations and soil stockpile were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH -G) using Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Method NWTPH -G or NWTPH -Gx, and for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) using EPA Method 8021B. Selected soil samples collected near the former waste oil UST, hydraulic hoists, and soil stockpile were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH -D) and oil (TPH -O) using Ecology Method NWTPH -D (extended). Selected samples were additionally analyzed for total lead. Based on laboratory results, sample EX43 -6 was additionally analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH), extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), BTEX, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), naphthalene, and n -hexane using WDOE Interim TPH Policy Methods. Laboratory Results With the exception of soil sample EX43 -6, laboratory results indicate that none of the soil samples collected from the UST, hoist, and pump island excavations following removal of impacted material contained any analyte concentrations exceeding Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A Cleanup Levels. Sample EX43 -6, collected approximately 6 feet bgs near the former western pump island, reportedly contained 533 parts per million (ppm) TPH -D, exceeding the MTCA Method A Cleanup Level of 200 ppm. Laboratory results are shown on Table 1 and Plates 3 and 4. Copies of laboratory reports and chain of custody documentation are attached. Results of subsequent Interim TPH Policy Method analyses for sample EX43 -6 indicate the sample contained a total EPH concentration of 61.60 ppm. Fluoranthene and phenanthrene concentrations of 0.011 and 0.013 ppm, respectively, were also detected. Remaining•analyte concentrations were below the laboratory method reporting limits.. Laboratory results of Interim TPH Policy methods are shown on Tables 2 and 3, and on the attached laboratory reports. BR-13102732R03 Tosco Site No 6L37—Tukwila. Washinston Aoii125.2002 Interim TPH Policy Method Evaluation Following receipt of laboratory results, an evaluation of the concentrations detected using Interim TPH Policy methods was performed using the Ecology Soil Cleanup Level Worksheets for the direct contact and protection of groundwater pathways. Results indicate that the analyte concentrations detected in EX43 -6 are protective of human health and the environment based on the hazard quotients and cancer risk factors calculated. Copies of the-Ecology Soil Cleanup Level Worksheets used in the calculations are attached. Conclusions Laboratory results of samples collected following remedial excavation indicate impacted material near the former USTs, pump islands, and hydraulic hoists has been effectively removed. Results of the investigation suggest a portion of the impacted soil removed during excavation resulted from releases associated with the pump island formerly present near the northern portion of the building. Evaluation of direct contact and groundwater protection pathways using the Ecology Soil Cleanup Level Worksheets indicate concentrations remaining following removal of impacted soil are protective of human health and the environment. Waste Disposal Soil removed from the excavations was placed on the asphalt surface at the site, covered with plastic sheeting, and temporarily stored on site pending off -site transport and disposal. Approximately 380 tons of soil was excavated from the former UST area, approximately 517 tons of soil was excavated in the area of the former product lines and pump islands, approximately 957 tons of soils was excavated from the hoist area, and approximately 611 tons was excavated west and southwest of the former building in the area of the former northern pump island. Hay bales and storm fencing were used to prevent runoff from entering the municipal storm sewer system. Between December 6, 2001, and January 16, 2002, approximately 2,500 tons of excavated soil was transported to the TPS Technologies, Inc. facility in Tacoma, Washington for treatment and recycling. Copies of the customer job reports are attached. ERI appreciates the opportunity to provide service on this project. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Envir s ental Resolutions, Inc. 3. ames S. Matthiessen Senior Staff Scientist John K. Meyer, R.G. Branch Manager J R13102732R03 Tosco Site No. 6237. Tukwila. Washincton ADn125. 2002 Attachments: Plate 1 Site Location Map Plate 2 Generalized Site Plan Plate 3 Soil Sample Analysis Map Plate 4 Soil Sample Analysis Map Table 1 Soil Analytical Results Table 2 Soil Analytical Results, Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) Table 3 Soil Analytical Results, Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) General Arrangement Drawing Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation Ecology Soil Cleanup Level Worksheets UST Decommissioning Checklist Customer Job Reports 1114T''''" i. 1Y:44: VAS V015 iN OttlA . ISO :' FN 310270001 EXPLANATION 1/2 —mile radius circle APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 0.5 SOURCE: Modified from a map provided by DeLorme 9 —D TopoQuads 1 mile SITE LOCATION MAP TOSCO SITE NO. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. 31027 PLATE 1 act 5/22/02 Planter • 1 r Area Enlarged on Plate 3._ r Area Enlarged on Plate 4 Former Build1nk i/ ii L 1 r Former UST's 1 • JJ J / (I Mlf9 II 1 1 � 1 1 I // J 1 � I / MT4 1 I Former 1 Pump I 1 Islands I 1 i\ 1 L -.- Property Line_ —. - -.— INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH -1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 80 FENT FN 310270002 EXPLANATION MW3 Monitoring Well MW1 Abandoned Monitoring Well r 1 1 L J r L J Tomos Clospordion Prior Station Facilities Excavation Limits GENERALIZED SITE PLAN TOSCO SITE NO. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington PROJECT 110. 31027 PLATE 2 oNbeM EX19 -8 12 01 8 2X21 -7 12 01 229 -7 11 01 EX8 -7 11 7 01 2X1 -9.6 11 01 2X2 -15 11 01 EX5 -16 11 01 2X10 -7 11 01 <6.00 7 <5.00 7 24.5 7 <10.5 9.6 <0.0300 <0.0500 <0.0500 <1.00 EX20 -8 12 01 8 11.7 <0.0900 <0.0500 0.142 1.14 EX19 -8 12 0 01 8 7.99 0.0836 <0.0500 <0.0500 0.368 <0.0900 <0.0500 <0.0500 0.196 0.0612 <0.0500 1.02 4.38 2123 -14 12/04/01 14 <16.0 <0.0959 <0.160 <0160 1.52 2222 -14 12/04/01 16 95.4 <0.0849 <0.141 0.211 5.97 2X18 -8 12/04/01 8 21.9 0.185 <0.0500 0.0638 0.225 2X17 -8 12 01 8 59.8 0.0562 0.0764 0.547 9.58 2228 -8 12/07/01 8 30.6 47.1 2X14 -14 12/04/01 14 <14.2 <0.0849 <0.142 <0.142 0.630 <0.0629 <0.105 <0.105 <0.210 16.4 35.1 15 <5.00 16 7 <5.00 <5.00 <0.0900 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 0.0488 <0.0500 <0.0500 <1.00 <0.0629 <0.106 <0.105 <0.210 EX3 -18 11 701 15 96.2 0.0491 0.133 0.289 0.331 EX21 -7 EX9 -7 EX8 -7 ;E410 -7 EX5-15 I d iEXI -9.5 [ EX3 -15 ' 1 ▪ • • 4 EX20 -8 i ; EX4 -15JE 11 -7 r - EX2 -15 EXI3 -8 . ;• 2X11 -7 11/30/01 7 <5.00 <0.0900 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 224 -16 11 01 15 <5.00 <0.0900 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 i 1 • EX23j;14 �i IX7 -8 L_J •PLI -3 i EX19 -8 � 1 / I 1 i 1 E t X22 -14 P1.3 -3 EXI8 -8 JJ ---j Y PL5 -3 ^.,I EXI5 -10 EX17 -8 1 • sl PL7 -3 EXI4- 14 EX16 -8 PLIl1 PL8 -3 1. PL13 -8 1 PL9 -3 EX28 -8 • ____ , EX32 -9 Planter EX6- 7 tot wl Property Line _ _ )__._ INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 2X32 -9 12/12/01 9 8.18 17.1 60.9 0.138 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 PL19 -8 12/06/01 8 16.2 0.0876 <0.0500 0.161 0.297 P111 -3 ,12/09/01 9 116 0.109 0.0603 0.622 2.91 PL9 -3 12/03/01 9 <6.00 <0.0300 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 PL8 -3 ,12/03/01 3 20.6 0.0476 <0.0500 0.0938 0.489 PL7 -9 L n6 -7 11/30/01, 7 <5.00 <0.0300 <0.0600 <0.0500 <0.100 12/03/01 9 44.8 0.0729 <0.0500 0.155 0.698 2X.7 -8 11001 8 <5.00 <0.0300 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 2X16 -10 12/04/01 10 <6.00 <0.0900 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 D16 -8 12/04/01, 8 24.6 0.797 <0.0500 1.51 0.254 PL1 -3 PL2 -3 12/03/01 3 <5.00 <0.0300 <0.0500 <0.0500 <0.100 12 01 3 1.340 4.93 19.9 22.9 148 PL3 -9 12/03/01 3 6.240 4.58 49.9 83.6 655 PL5 -3 12/03/01 3 19.3 0.0655 <0.0500 0.279 1.19 APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 40 80 FEET FN 910270009 EXPLANATION • EX15 -10 Sample Point • PL11 -3 Sample Point Removed During Excavation r l Prior Station Facilities Excavation Limits Former Product Lines 1110o1eM r•am.a tram • map • provided Corporation EX21 -3 11/24/01 3 330 330 ND 59.3 1.78 0.825 52.7 Laboratory Results in mg/kg (ppm) Sample Name Sample Date Sample Depth in Feet Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Oil Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Numbers in Red Exceed MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels RESOLUTIONS„ /MIA. SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS MAP TOSCO SITE NO. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. 31027 PLATE 3 Wit 04/08/02 =34-7 12 01 7 12.2 31.2 EX42 -8 12 01 8 <5.00 <10.0 <25.0 0.212 <0.0500 0.185 1.08 EX43 -8• 12 ®01 6 5.08 74.1 633 0.0387 <0.0500 0.0876 0.163 EX37 -6 12 m 01 6 27.8 58.8 EX34 -7 EX33 -10 12 01 10 11.4 85.5 r --.-- j EX37 -5r EX31 -9 12 ®01 9 13.2 42.1 H4 -10 1201 10 1,990 2,300 H2 -9 12 L7 01 9 <10.0 <25.0 H3 -8 12 01 8 7,870 18,400 24 -9 EX33, 10 H4 -10 ■ 2-9 • • H34-8 H6 -16 H5 -14 1 i EX25 -7 / L--- EX35 -9 r -- -j EX42 -8 EC 6 -8 I EX40 -61 ■EX41 6 X38 -5 EX36 -p �j ¢ EX27 -6 EX43 -6 X4 J 11 EX214 -8 L ..JAL EX40 -8 EX38 -5 EX41 -8 EX35 -9 EX38 -6 EX26 -8 1201 12 m 01 12 m 01 12 m 01 12/14/01 12701 8 5 8 9 8 8 <5.00 1,920 <5.00 -- 25.9 -- -- 27.8 <10.0 <10.0 18.0 <10.0 -- 58.8 <25.0 35.7 88.2 28.4 0.747 1.43 0.0801 -- 0.319 -- <0.0500 1.24 <0.0500 -- <0.100 -- 0.188 18.1 <0.0600 -- 1.89 -- 0.839 91.7 0.159 -- 4.78 -- • Sample 1 X43 -8 was additionally analysed using Interim TPH Policy Methods H8 -18 12 01 18 87.5. 130 EX24 -9 12 01 9 <10.0 29.7 H5 -14 12001 14 <26.0 97.5 EX26 -7 12m01 7 <10.0 <25.0 EX27 -8 12 01 6 <10.0 <25.0 EX28 -8 12 m 01 8 30.8 47.1 APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 30 60 FN 310270004 EXPLANATION • EX15 -10 Sample Point ■ . EX38 -5 Sample Point Removed During Excavation f- -1 I I - - --1 I 1 L - - - -J 110011CM uodieod aona Tomo Corporation Prior Station Facilities Excavation Limits EX36 -8 11 m 01 8 839 330 330 59.3 1.76 0.625 52.7 Laboratory Results in mg /kg (ppm) Sample Name Sample Date Sample Depth in Feet Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Oil Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Numbers in Red Exceed MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS MAP TOSCO SITE NO. 6237 13038 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington PROJECT NO. 31027 PLATE 4 041 011/01 CITY OF TUKWILA Planning Dept Attention: Brandon Miles 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 Phone: 206 433 -1800 Fax: 206 433 -1833• TTY: 206 248 -2933 RE: Interurban Retail E04 -006 Brandon, Please see attached the appropriate labels for the residents within 500ft of 13038 Interurban Ave. You will find (in this order): - Parcel Map with 500 ft vicinity - A label key prepared in Excel that reconciles resident addresses - Printed labels for sites identified Please do not hesitate to call if you have any additional questions. Thanks Cory Shelest Gramor Development Washington, LLC cory @gramorwa.com (425) 787 -9863 Print Map Page King County Home News Services Comments Search Page 1 of 2 Parcel Map and Data. Parcel Number 0003000110 Address 13038 INTERURBAN AV S Zipcode Taxpayer CIRCLE K STORES INC(PT #U -6 The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." 0 Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 0003000032 13510 INTERURBAN AVE S CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT Parcel Number 0003000046 Address 13001 48TH AVE S 1- Iaflt/ Zipcode . Taxpayer TOM RUSSELL L Parcel Number 0003000045 Ctnetald Address 13100 48TH AV S Int'1 Zipcode Taxpayer DENNYS INC (+� Parcel Number 0003000106 Address 4800 S 126TH ST 3ACvc Zipcode frArf p Taxpayer CBIZ PROPERTY TAX http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 4/8/2004 Print Map Page Page 2 of 2 King County 1 GIS Center 1 News ( Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.metroke.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 4/8/2004 SOLUTIONS 0 Parcel Number Address SHELL Zipcode Taxpayer 0003000108 13138 INTERURBAN AV S EQUIVA SERVICES LLC V Parcel Number Address Wow Zipcode Taxpayer 0003000109 13123 INTERURBAN AV S DEM L LC Parcel Number Address Jhk Zipcode �'niE code rr p B'oX Taxpayer 0003000112 13050 INTERURBAN AV S CBIZ PROPERTY TAX SOLUTIONS 6 Parcel Number Address 76 Zipcode Taxpayer 0003000113 13310 INTERURBAN AV S TOSCO CORP Parcel Number Address 16 Zipcode Taxpayer 0003000113 13310 INTERURBAN AV S TOSCO CORPORATION 0 Parcel Number Nasky Address Zipcode Haler Taxpayer 0003000116 53044 INTERURBAN AVE DEM L L C i Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 0004800002 12642 INTERURBAN AVE S a CITY LIGHT OF SEATTLE CITY l�a ` Parcel Number Address V4L?I'PIe Zipcode Tenan1S Taxpayer 0004800015 13035 GATEWAY DR S AMB PROPERTY LP V Parcel Number r1014A Address rei;n4 5 Zipcode Taxpayer 0004800017 13028 INTERURBAN AV S AMB PROPERTY LP 9 Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 1523040002 6 Parcel Number (qvA Address lope„ Zipcode Wptplet Taxpayer 2716000010 12886 INTERURBAN AV S AMB PROPERTY LP tb Parcel Number Din of Address Lagoon Zipcode 1 Avg stes3Taxpayer 2716000050 12806 GATEWAY DR S AMB PROPERTY LP Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 2716000080 . CITY OF TUKWILA King County 1 GIS Center 1 News ( Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.metroke.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 4/8/2004 Key:. ParcellD Resident 0003000032 CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 2 0003000045 EMERALD INN 3 0003000046 HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CYCLES 4 0003000106 JACK -IN- THE -BOX [double] 5 0003000108 SHELL (Terry McLuaghlin) 6 0003000109 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 7 0003000112 JACK -IN- THE -BOX 8 0003000113 76 (Stan Peterson) 10 0003000116 [shared by Husky and Harley] 11 0004800002 CITY OF SEATTLE CITY LIGHT 12 0004800015 Eshelon Telecom, Inc 12 0004800015 Optioncare 12 0004800015 UPS 12 0004800015 Otis 13 0004800017 Fireside Thrift Co 13 0004800017 Hartman Escrow Inc 13 0004800017 CLP Resources Inc 13 0004800017 Auto Insurance Stores 13 0004800017 Tukwila Deli 15 2716000010 GVA Kidder Mathews 16 2716000050 Department of Labor and Industries Address _ 13510 INTERURBAN AVE�S 13100 48TH AV S 13001 48TH AVE S 4800 S 126TH ST 13138 INTERURBAN AV S 13123 INTERURBAN AV S 13050 INTERURBAN AV S 13310 INTERURBAN AV S 13044 INTERURBAN AVE S 12642 INTERURBAN AVE S 13035 GATEWAY DR S #119 13035 GATEWAY DR S #131 13035 GATEWAY DR S #149 13035 GATEWAY DR S #157 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #124 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #116 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #112 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #104 13028 INTERURBAN AV S #100 12886 INTERURBAN AV S 12806 GATEWAY DR S Ci ty State Zip Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Seattle, WA 98168 Jam Free Printing ammoss. vwvw avery.com Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5263TM Emoszal 1- 000-GO -AVERY Department of Labor and Industries 12806 GATEWAY DR S Seattle, WA 98168 aE9ZS OM BRA 2716000050 CIAVERY® 5263TM CA AiJ3AV-O9-0081. ni£9ZS 31b►1dW31 ®M AV es fl wog liaane•n►�nnnn 6ugulad eaid wer • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard," Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanCtt�.ci.tukwila.wa.ug • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: I (1- 1-erur-ban RP:4-a.1 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, "access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 13D'3g ln-fervrbar>, Ave., S Pai -c &I Nuvtiber-: 0003000110 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your fax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: •. has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name. : t &4W-' Address: 1133 1 64 11 St _S W Phone: A M o FZ. 1701 ELOP Nt Cnt j 425• 1-4-L . CC. FAX: Signature: 4 26 . q-42 • G 6 53 Date: vi A-g I-f 31 / 0 4-• RECEIVED MAR ` 200Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA Planner: File Number: Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: I (1- 1-erur-ban RP:4-a.1 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, "access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 13D'3g ln-fervrbar>, Ave., S Pai -c &I Nuvtiber-: 0003000110 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your fax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: •. has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name. : t &4W-' Address: 1133 1 64 11 St _S W Phone: A M o FZ. 1701 ELOP Nt Cnt j 425• 1-4-L . CC. FAX: Signature: 4 26 . q-42 • G 6 53 Date: vi A-g I-f 31 / 0 4-• RECEIVED MAR ` 200Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application Information Required:. May be waived in unusual cases, -upon'approva l:of both Public Works ' and Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items,submitted with application. 1 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, State Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). / J 3. One set of any plans submitted reduced to 8 1/2" by 11". One complete set of PMTS of the final drawing set will be required prior to final approval. 1' 4. Application Fee $500. 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA Review. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: / \/ 6. Mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Number of sets depends on the notice requirements of the underlying permit, check with Planning Staff. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Materials section). / ✓ 7. King County Assessor's map(s) that shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot (if mailing labels are required). 8. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that the application is complete (see Public Notice Materials section). PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: ,/ 9. Vicinity Map with site location. 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". P. \Red — Book \SEPA —APP.DOG 01/23/03 RECEIVED MAR 3 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of 1 ukwila 1109 Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: M A-g 31 , Zoo4 -- Applicant Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: &g-A -1 o2 vEve -e'PH ENT' 1133 • 1644" s4. 41' loq L.•tr.1✓l ooai WA- 9 So3�- Telephone: ¢2 5 666 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 ii Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading ? , Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 , Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate. response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4). 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the . withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6 -0 YES Continue to Question 6 -0 City of 1 ukunlnlA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and /or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3. Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -1.2). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle Lily/ of 1'ukunla•A Screening Checklist appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) . YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. ' CI Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. • catty of 'l ukzuilipA Screening Checklist Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)• YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green /Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. COContinue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -5 . YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a • City of lukunla4109 Screening Checklist watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids' under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) • City of Tukwila Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Interurban Retail 2. Name of applicant: John Graham 3. Address, phone number and name of contact person: 1133 164th St. SW, #107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 425- 742 -5666 4. Date checklist prepared: March 25, 2004 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (include phasing if applicable): Construction of this project is scheduled to occur following approval of all required permits. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental °information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this project. - Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 7, 2003; - Underground Storage Tank Decommissioning and Remedial Excavation, dated April 25, 2002 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, describe. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. a. Grade and fill permit b. building permit c. sign permits d. health dept. approvals e. flood control zone permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of you proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Development of the site will include the construction of a retail building totaling 5,500 s.f.. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at 13038 Interurban Ave. South, Tukwila, WA (Parcel ID 0003000110). The site is located on the north side of Interurban Highway S., directly between 46th Ave S. and Gateway Drive S.. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle or highlight one): Flat, rolling, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Previously developed gas station with buildings and tanks removed. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% - 5% slope c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soils found on the site are typical of soils found in river basins i.e. gravelly sandy loam in nature. Soil has been remediated subsequent to the existence of the former fueling station. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None known. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No fill is required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. The impacts of any erosion control which may occur during the clearing and grading and subsequent construction of the project may be mitigated by the implementation of a temporary erosion control plan and permanent landscaping of such pervious areas. g. Approximately what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt, buildings)? Following the construction it is estimated that approximately 88% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces, i.e. buildings, walkways and asphalt. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. As a first step to control erosion impacts, a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be designed in accordance with the . standards of the City of Tukwila. This Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan may include the use of a filter fabric fence to effectively mitigate the impact of soils eroding into the adjacent stormwater drainage ditch. • Following the completion of the grading, filling, and construction phases the landscape areas will include a variety of groundcover, shrubs and trees that are wither indigenous to or suitable to the Pacific Northwest climate. These landscape plantings will assist in ongoing erosion control. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The project may result in an increase in emissions to the air, both during construction and following project completion. During construction there may be construction equipment exhaust, which may be from diesel or gasoline fuels. There may also be airborne dust particles affecting air quality, particularly during the filling state of the project. These emissions will be temporary in nature and in our opinion do not have a lasting or harmful effect on the project or adjacent properties. During construction, the amount of airborne dust particles generated will be minimal and associated with the filling activity to raise the level of the site 6 inches. Following construction the project will generate both automobile and truck transport vehicle emissions. This will increase the amount of suspended particles, carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), hydrocarbons (HC), and other typical pollutants. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. The only off -site sources of emissions of odor that may affect this proposal would include the exhaust emissions from vehicles traveling along Interurban Ave S. and Interstate 5. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any. Measures which are proposed to reduce or control emission or other impacts to air during the construction include occasional sprinkling of the site during the grading activity to minimize the quantity of dust in the air caused during this phase. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site • • (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, described type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no known water bodies on or adjacent to the subject property. Green River is approximately 1/2 mile to the east. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the sources of fill material. Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes 6. Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve the discharge of waste materials to surface waters. All sanitary waste will be disposed into existing sanitary sewers. b. Ground 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn or discharged. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals...., agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the • system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground as all sanitary sewers will be conveyed into the public sanitary sewer system. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Prior to and during construction, stormwater will be contained and protected with fabric filters within the existing storm drainage system. Post development, the onsite system will be expanded on the westerly portion of the site to collect stormwater runoff from roof tops, pavement sections and walkways and conveyed into catch basin pipe systems built to City of Tukwila standards. Stormwater runoff may also occur from the landscape areas. Because these areas are permeable, water runoff is anticipated to be considerably less that that from the developed areas. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Because the facility's system will connect to the public sanitary sewer it is unlikely that any sanitary sewage waste material will enter the ground or surface waters. If the existing system is not properly maintained it could be possible for hydrocarbons and oils to enter the surface water system via the existing catch basins. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan will be prepared and approved prior to construction and will be satisfactorily maintained until construction is completed and the potential for on -site erosion has passed. All on -site stormwaters will be collected and discharged into the adjacent storm drain culvert through a catch basin/pipe conveyance system with oil/water separators. The catch basins will be maintained on a regular basis reducing the potential for oil, hydrocarbons or silt from entering surface waters. 4. PLANTS a. Circle or highlight types of vegetation found on the site: _ Deciduous tree: Alder Maple Aspen Other • • Evergreen tree: Fir Cedar Pine Other: Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: _ Cattail Buttercup Bulrush Skunk Cabbage Other: Water plants: Water lily Celgrass Milfoil, Other Other types of vegetation: b. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species on or near the site. c. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? There is currently no on -site vegetation or landscaping. Following construction, vegetation and perimeter landscaping or grasses will not provide significant habitat for wildlife. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Around the perimeter of the site there will be professionally designed and maintained landscaping and planting areas all in accordance with the City of Tukwila's requirements. All existing vegetation in good health and in compliance with the City's standards will be maintained; all others will be enhanced or replaced. S. ANIMALS a. Circle or highlight any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk Heron Songbird Eagle Other: _ Mammals: Deer Bear Elk Beaver Other: Fish: Bass Salmon Herring Trout Shellfish Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 1 • The Pacific Northwest Flyway, which covers a majority of the Northwest and Puget Sound region, is, the route for the migratory water fowl. However, there is no habitat on this site which would support such species. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. The provision of landscaping in accordance with the City requirements will provide a small habitat for small birds and mammals. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kind of energy (electrical, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs. Natural gas will be used for heating and electricity will be used primarily for lighting, cooling and appliance operations. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The buildings will be constructed to meet current energy code compliance. The roofs will be white and buildings painted light colors to help reflect the sun's radiation. All buildings will meet all applicable Washington State Energy and Building codes. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Special emergency services that may be required during the construction phase of the project could include fire, police and medical services. The same emergency services may be needed at the completion of the project. Hazardous material or response • • personnel and possible involvement by the State Department of Ecology or Environmental Protection Agency may also be required in the unlikely event of a catastrophic emergency. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The contractor will submit a safety plan, an erosion control plan and have fire extinguishers in easily accessible locations throughout the construction phase of the proj ect. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The only off -site noises in the area which may affect this project include traffic from the adjacent Interurban Ave., 46`h Ave S., Gateway Drive S., and Interstate 5. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On the short-term basis it is possible the construction activities will generate noise due to construction equipment, power tools and grading equipment: On a long term basis it is anticipated that the only noise created by this project will be noise of automobiles and service vehicles entering and exiting the project. Construction activity would occur during normal business hours. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? North: Industrial distribution facility South: right of way for SR 599 East: Fast Food Restaurant — Jack -In- The -Box West: Office building 17,200 s.f. AMB Institutional Alliance Fund b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. Former 1568 s.f. Circle K convenience store and retail fuel sales area (now demolished). d. Will any structures be destroyed? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial — LI f. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The site is not adjacent to a shoreline of statewide significance and therefore not subject to the Shoreline Master Program. g. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation for the site is for business and commercial. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. To our knowledge, no parts of the site have been classified as an environmentally sensitive area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? • 10 persons, maximum would work at this completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No persons would be displaced as a result of this project. k. Proposed measure to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any? None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Development of the site is in compliance with the City of Tukwila's zoning code, which will ensure compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure on the site would be the parapets on top of the retail building and would be 16 feet high. The exterior of the buildings would be painted a light color and constructed of Hardy -plank and/or masonry. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? Quality design and construction in accordance with City of Tukwila codes. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light and glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No light or glare is expected to occur from the construction activities. However, after project completion the primary source of light and glare would be emitted from the interior building lighting, internally illuminated signage, site and building lighting and lights from vehicles entering and exiting the site. Any lighting impacts of these natures will occur during the evening hours and during late afternoon in the winter months. Site lighting will be designed to minimize any spill -over illumination onto adjacent parcels. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? It is not anticipated that light or glare for the completed project will be a safety hazard or interfere with views. The head - lights for vehicles exiting the site, will in fact, contribute towards pedestrian and vehicular safety in the immediate area. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may effect your proposal? Existing off -site sources of light include street lighting and headlamps from automobiles on the adjacent roadways. These are not expected to adversely affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light or glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts include the use of shields on all site lights to prevent light spillage onto adjacent parcels. Additionally, the perimeter landscape plantings may also assist in minimizing light spill- over onto the adjacent roadway for the headlamps of automobiles within the site. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, • • scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any? None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Ave. is the only street serving the site. Proposed access to the existing street system is shown on the attached site plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project would have 23 stalls. No parking stalls would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing road or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will not use water, rail, or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? Daily trips would be reduced by 114 primary; PM peak trips "in" would be reduced by 12; PM peak trips "out" would be reduced by 12; total peak trips would be reduced by g. What peak hour traffic is generated by the proposed project? • • Peak hour traffic generated by the proposed project is estimated to be approximately 40. Of this total 18 are "new" trip versus the 22 are pass -by trips. h. The directional movements the traffic shall take and the peak hour distribution. Unknown. i. The traffic influence at the two (2) closest intersections to the proposed project. Unknown. j. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. The proposed project would substantially improve traffic flows into and out of the existing site. We will utilize the existing joint curb cuts along Interurban Avenue and would construct a service road which would align with the drive along the adjoining properties to the south (Jack -In- The -Box, etc). Also proposed is an egress point for the proposed Drive - through facility through the adjoining property to ease possible congestion at the site access point along the service drive. These measures should significantly improve vehicular safety, vehicular access and pedestrian visibility and safety. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project should require less police servicing as the existing site has been vacated and may allow for unintended uses and loitering. Demand for fire protection should remain low. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Mitigation measures to minimize demand for public services include compliance with all fire protection requirements. We would expect the businesses within the proposed project to be net contributors to the City in terms of tax dollars versus services consumed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle or highlight utilities currently available at the site (underlined): electricity natural gas water telephone refuse service sanitary sewer septic system cable television other: • • b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities proposed for this project will be provided by the City of Tukwila. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on then to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: OAR Z t /6 4- 6 • • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites. wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • • TRAFFIC GENERATION QUESTIONNAIRE Instructions: Please complete the following questionnaire and attach one copy of the proposed site plan. These answers and site plan, together with other data will be used to help determine the need for a traffic study. Applicant: John Graham Address: 1133 164`h St. SW, #107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 Phone: 425- 742 -5666 Proposed Project: 1. Location: 13038 Interurban Ave., Tukwila, WA 2. Description of Project: Redevelopment of a former Unocal and fuel station and Circle K convenience store into a 4 building multi -tenant retail project totaling 5,500 sf. 3. What is the total combined square footage for all proposed buildings? Also, please list the square footage for each individual building: The building has 5,500 sf: Unit A is 1,500 sf, Unit B is 1,300 sf, Unit C is 1,300 sf, and Unit D is 1,400sf 4. What is the size of your site? 25,800 sf 5. How many employees will be working at the site? 10 6. Other comments relating to traffic generation that you feel should be known: The proposed project would substantially improve traffic flows into and out of the existing site. We will utilize the existing joint curb cuts along Interurban Avenue and would construct a service road which would align with the drive along the adjoining properties to the south (Jack -In- The -Box, etc). Also proposed is an egress point for the proposed Drive - through facility through the adjoining property to ease possible congestion at the site access point along the service drive. These measures should significantly improve vehicular safety, vehicular access and pedestrian visibility and safety. The Community Development Director will review this questionnaire, the site plan and other data available to determine if a traffic study is required. It is understood by the applicant that if the proposal changes significantly in the future, a new questionnaire and determination for the need of a traffic study may be required, as determined by the Community Development Director. Completed by : • • Date: e" tip- 3 { /°¢— 54q 24' 00" - 112.00'.\ 5' -0" 'TYPE 'fir SIDEYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER I0, -0 0 ONE WAY 140' -0" 5' -0" "TYPE II' SIDEYARG LANDSCAPE BUFFER 0 0 9r -o" 0 4 W 0 a 2 0 Z X W 2 -0`I STARBUCKS RETAIL 1,500 80. FT. RETAIL 1,300 80. FT. RETAIL 1,300 80. FT. �J�iiMYU•�•ui• i r�i 11•11�111111111•11111111111■ ■r ■■ ■1111■ ■1111■ ■11111■1111 ■ ■■ ■■ 11•111111111111r■111111111111r ■ ■11 ■■ ■1111■ ■1111 ■11111111■ ■•1111 liv. RETAIL 1,400 80. FT. 42'-0" iii EMI C OAIINO AREA �!q 0 1) ACCEB8 C C C C C C 1• 0 I5 5' -0" LANDSCAPE STRIP I 1 EXISTING ACCESS ROAD 20 -0' __-_ 54q 24' 00" _ ,112_00' ______ STARBUCKS: 1,500 SQ. FT. GENERAL RETAIL: 4,000 SO. FT. TOTAL AREA: 5,500 S. FT. TOTAL PARKING REOUIREO: 14 STALLS ( 2.5 STALL / 1000 S.F. RETAIL) TOTAL PARKING PROVIC:EI 23 STALLS ( 4.5 STALLS / 1,000 S.F. ) SITE ZONING: COMM / LI ( LIGHT INIDUSTRIAL ) ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE R.O.W. _ 12' -6" 'TYPE 1" FRONTYARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER, A1' INTERURBAN AVENUE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN' SCALE' 1' - 30' -0" • I j 6' 6' 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 Y I 13038 Interurban Ave S, Tukwila, WA 98168 AMB Gateway Development parcel (13038 Interurban Ave) Permit Land Curb -cut off of Interurban that we are sharing with AMB Jack in the Box Seattle City Light Right of Way Curb -cut off of Interurban that we are sharing with Husky and Jack in the Box Note: The Seattle City Light Right of Way extends along the length of Interurban Ave S. Permit is for the use of the portion in front of our property (13038 Interurban Ave) that is outlined in bold dashed red and access agreements cover the use of the curb cuts. The striped section above indicates legal access to the development site across the SCL right -of -way, a band of 30 ft represented by recording #6585544. Source : www.terraserver.microsoft.com Foster, Washington, United States 13 June 2002 t 3 8 5 0 1. ALL GRADING SHALL COMPLY TO CHAPTER 33 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CDOE, 111LE 17, AND TITLE 24 OF THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY CODE(CURRENT EDITION). • 2. TESC MEASURES SHALL BE INSTAI1ED PRIOR TO ANY 9TE WORK (SEE ATUCIED DETAILED DRAINAGE PLAN). CONTRACTOR SHALL VISUALLY ASPECT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING RAINFALL EVENTS ALL ESC MEASURES SHALL BE REPAIRED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 3. ALL PERSONS ENGAGING IN DEVELOPMENT ACTMTES SHALL PREVENT OR MINIMIZE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION ON- 91E.'AND SHALL PROTECT PROPERTIES AND WATER COURSES DOWNSTREAM FROM THE SITE [SCC 24.30.0200X8)} 4. All SIKttIS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAR OF DIRT AND DEBRIS DURING EXCAVATION AND FE. OPERATIONS SINLLIS SHALL BE SWEPT IMMEDIATLY WHEN DIRT HAS BEEN TRACED ONTO NE PAVED SURFACES 5. NE TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITY (TESC) SHALL BE ODNSTRUCIED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR EXTENSIVE LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE PATH THE APPROVED TEMPORARY ER090N/SEUIMENTA11N CO11R(X PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 6. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE ERO9CH CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND /OR CLEARING 1.1161S MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION CF PROJECT PERMITS, PUN APPROVAL AND BOND FORECLOSURES. 7. FROM APRIL 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30, SOL SHALL BE EXPOSED FOR A MA IMUM CF 7 DAYS. GROUND COVER BMPS SHALL BE USED 1O STABILIZE THE SOIL B. SOIL STOCKPILES SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS WHEN ACTIVELY CMG MATH THE SOIL STOCKPILE, STABNZATION SHALL OCCUR AT THE END OF EACH WORKDAY. 9. SILTATION BARRIERS AND ALL OTHER TESC MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED /IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.1' RAINFALL, AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL EVENTS 10, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF TESC FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONDUCTED IMMEDIATELY UPON REC)GRIION OF A PROBLEM OR WHEN THE ESC MEASURES BECOME DAMAGED. 11. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES UPON REACHING A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES • 12. SUFFICIENT TEST MP MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES TO PROTECT THE ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON -91E. 13. INLETS OF THE PERMANENT DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT INFLUX BY USE OF FILTER FABRIC, MICROPORE BAGS, OR SIMILAR FILTERING MATERIALS AND METHODS 14. CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A WELL ESTABLSHED GROUND COVER THAT FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND 1111E 24, SNOHOMISH COUNTY DRAINAGE ORDINANCE 15. ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE CULTIVATED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COUNTY INSPECTOR. THIS MAY BE ACCOMPUS HED BY DISCING, RAKING HARROWING OR OTHER AMEPTABLE MEANS. PERFORM ALL CULTURAL OPERATIONS ACROSS CR AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SLOPE IF NECESSARY; SURFACE RUNOFF CONTROL MEASURES SUCH AS GRADIENT TERRACES, INTERCEPTOR DIKE/SWALES, LEVEL SPREADERS, AND SEDIMENT BA9NS SHALL BE INSTALLED PIBDR TO SEEDING 16 ALL DISTURBED AREAS SUCH AS RETENTION FACILITIES, ROADWAY BACK-SLOPES, ETC. SHALL BE SEEDED . VAN A PERENNIAL GROUND COVER GLASS TO MINIMIZE EROSION GRASS SEEDING VALL BE DONE USING AN APPROVED HYDROSEEDER OR AS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY SNOHOIISH COUNTY. 17. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION (C0N9STNG O RAPID, PER9STENT AND LEGUME) WALL BE APPl1ED. (MINIMUM 80/ PER ACRE). THIS IS TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING 201E ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID GRASS, 40% CREEPING RED FESCUE, 40% WHITE CLOVER HYDROSEEDD REQUIRED. 1& FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPLIED AT 44X)1 PER ACRE OF 10 -20-20 (10 POUNDS PER 1100 SQUARE FEET) OR EQUIVALENT. DEVELOPS/ENIS ADJACENT TO WATER BODES SHALL USE NON - PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER '. 19. EXCESS EXCAVATION SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERAQTOU SITE OR COMMERCIAL TOPSOIL CkIPANY. 20. FROM .00TOBER 1 TO MARCH 31 GRADING WALL NOT BE PERMITTED MMIHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE DIRECTOR, OR APPROVAL OF A WAIVER [17.05.145 (2)] THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTE ARE ALSO IMPORTANT. (SEE WINTER GRADING NOTES SECTION) ' 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SNCHOYIS1 CDUNTY!ENGNEERING DEIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS'(ED.D.S.), WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /AMERICAN PUBLIC VMS ASSOCIATION 2000 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNIOPAL CONSTRUCTION, ANB THE CURRENT *MOT HYD RAUU S MANUAL - 2. ALL NW PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT MALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY THEff,000NTY INSPECTOR OR HIS DE9GNATED ROITATIVE OR TO ANY 91E WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE COUNTY INSPECTOR AT (206) 388 -3213. TO SCHEDULE A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 3. PRIOR TO ANY 91E1DISTURBOIG ACTMTY INCLUDING CLEARING LOGGING OR TONG,' THE 91E GEARING LOOTS AS 910M ON THESE PLANS SMALL BE LOCATED AND FIELD IDENTIFIED BY THE PROECT 4. THE 0ESGN TOM IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE DOSING CONDITIONS. THE DOSING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN SHEETS ARE BASED UPON SURVEY BY RED MDDLETON,. DATED .APRIL 1999. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING FEND CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BOOM jHE PROPOSED 9TEWORI( IMPROVEMENTS. IF CONFLICTS ARE VERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR END OF BIDDING IF PERMITTED, REMAIN EXPOSED ROR MORE THAN 2 DAYS OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 30, NO SOIL MAY FROM MAY 1 TO S PIDMBER 30, NO SOL MAY REMAIN EWOSED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS . DENUDED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED BY MULCH. SOD, PLASM ON OTHER COVER �p AS NEEDED. . SOL STOCO?ILES ALL BE STABILIZED OR PROTECTED NTH SEDIMENT RETENT.BMP'S WITHIN 24 HOURS O FORMATION. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TIMED AND CONDUCTED N STAGES TO MINIMIZE SOIL EXPOSURE, NET SEASON GRADING. NOTES (OCTOBER 1 THROUGH MARCH 31) THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE SHALL BE MODIFIED TO MINIMIZE THE AREA OF UNSTABLIffD SOIL. A MAXIMUM OF 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF DIRT WILL REMAIN UNCOVERED DURING RAINFALL EVENTS AND FOLLOYWNG WORK :PERIODS ROLLER SEALING OF SITE SHALL TAKE PUCE FOLLOWING WORK PERIODS FOR AREAS NOT COVERED BY PLASTIC SHEETING OR MULCTING. EARTHEN AREAS THAT ARE SUEI,ECT ID CONTRIBUTING SEDIMENTS DURING STORM EVENTS AND WHERE EARTH MOVEMENT IS NOT ANTICIPATED FOR 48 HOURS SHALL BE STABILIZED USING THE FOLLOWING BMPS: - ROLLER SEAWNI, STRAW MULCTING OR PLASTIC WEEERNG - SILTATION OF DOWNSTREAM AREAS MINIMIZED BY DE:IFN1104 FAC8JIES AND COMPOST FILTER T,•1 LY W - , IL.VV IT-C E II' SIDEYARD *GAPE BIFF'ER 5'o' LANDSCAPE STRIP EXI811NO ACCE88 ROAD 549 24' 00' - 172A0' . BTARBucKS' - 1,500 80. FT. GENERAL RETAIL' 4,000 80.-FT. TOTAL_ AREA, 5.500 80. PT. TOTAL PARKING REOUIREO' 14 BTAL -8 ( 25 STALL / 1000. B.F. RETAIL) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED' 23 STALLS ( 4.5 STALLS / •.000 8F_ ) BITE 'ZONING/. ..COMM,/ LI ( L.10)-IT I NOUE/TRIAL ) ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE P.C.W. . L�r Is 111; J . U'-6' 'TYPE r FROWARD LAIASOAPE BLIPPED INTERURBAN AVE. VENUE PRELIMINARY. SITE PLAN' SCALE. 17. - _. SODS SHALL NO ONLY .CN PAVED wrxr .' SLOPES 8% AND SHEETING, 6-MIL ( MINIMUM). THE SHEETING SHALL BE ANCHORED MATH SAND BAGS LOCATED 5 -FEET APART ON THE r' r AND 10 -FEET ON CENTER ON THE REMAINDER OF THE SHEETING. A MINIMUM OF 2 -FEET I IS REQUIRED FOR OVERLAPPING SHEE15. WATER 1' ./ •13I FROM THE SITE WILL BE MONITORED FOR TURBIDITY. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TURBIDITY OF DISCHARGED ATER WILL BE 5 NM OVER BACKGROUND. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE MORI I• ING'.WEEXLY AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ANY STORM EVENTS GREATER THAN 1' OF RAINFALL MONI I's G METHODS TO BE COORDINATED AND APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR AS PART OF THE PROECT '° - CONSTRUCTION MEETING. MEN RAINFALL IS HEAVY (DEFINED AS RAINFALL HARD ENOUGH TO PRODUCE SEDIMENT RUN -OF FR011 EXPOSED DIRT), TAL1. EORISED EARIHWOBK SHALL BE COVERED OR ROLLER' SEALED. NO OTHER CONSTRUCTION CIMTY SHALL OCCUR ON PREVIOUS SURFACES DURING THESE PERIODS OF HEAVY RAIN. ALL DRAINAGE ;'ALES SHALL BE FULLY VEGETATED. MALES SHALL BE SODDED U THE VEGETATION GROWING IN THfj SWAGE IS INSUFFICIENT TO PROMDE WATER QUIWIY AND TO PREVENT. EROSION OF THE SWAGE. BE DISTURBED EXCEPT FOR ACTUAL COSTRUC110N ACTMIIES. PARKING IS ALLOWED • /0R GRAVEL SURFACES TER WNWT ESTABLISHED GROUND COVER KT. BE swum 'W11H PLASTIC EROSION CONTROL SEOUENQNG 110TE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT 1EDC MEASURES FOLLOWING EACH RAINFALL EVENT OR EVERY 24 HOURS DURING A PROLONGED RAINFALL EVENT, ID ENSURE PROPER FUNCTION,' AND REPLACE OR REPAIR AS NECESSARY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL TEMPORARY DRANAGE FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES AN) THE MARTHA LAKE GATEWAY CENTER DETENTION VAULT UPON RffACO IG'A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. SEE SHEET D-2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. CAUTION - NOTICE 10 CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IN SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF DUSTING UT6ITIET AS 9(0W91 ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTTIIIY C)MPANES AID, WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN N THE FIELD. CONTRACTOR TO CALL 1-800- 424 -5555 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANKED EXCAVATIONS THE .INFORMATION IS NOT'FT0 BE REIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UIIUTY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES IT HALL BE THE RESP0NSBUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE AI. EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT VAN NE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OWN ON THESE -' 13038 Interurba SILT FENCE I • 0316TRUCTION ENTRANCE ,L, I *E/J OE7 f .LL. AfFc• ` CREW,. -BA VATS e s' PRMOSED FINISH GiRA& .1. . /' DISIING CONTIUR ' COUNTY FILE # I (8P T) . Gf:v l..tLr ..:,%f414-17. - Mfr .V7:19,-"2. snl:TS ,b- i t- PERMIT .SUBMITTAL - //01/0,7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN D -1.0 FILTER FABRIC•YAIERIAL., MIRAFI 100X OR EQUAL 2%2%14 GA. WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR EQUAL PROJECT SITE USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO RE 1 NDISTURBED .j, �y •��� ;; GROUND NOTE: - UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT OR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE ONMER, THE ALTER • FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. SILT FENCE DETAIL NTS BURY FILTER FABRIC IN TRENCH FILLED WITH GRAVEL BACK - FILL FOR DRAINS 1vC 11't OCl... 11, ' .1 LI Iv, fl'+C MAINTENANCE OF SILT FENCE 1. SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAWFALL NECESSARY REPAIRS TO FENCE SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED PROMPTLY. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE RFLOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL ) TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTR NCE 1. INSTALLAION:•THE AREA CI- THE EN ANCE SHOULD BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION, ROOTS OTHER OBJEC110NABLE MATERIAL .THE GRA SHALL BE PLACED TO THE SPECIFIED DIMENSIONS ANY DRAINAGE FACILITIES REQUIRED BECAUSE OF WASHING SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS IN THE PLAN. F WASH RACKS ARE USD, THEY .SHOULD BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS 50' MIN. R =25' MIN. 4' TO 8' CRUSHED BALLAST ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL X20' MIN. 'PROVIDE FULL 1NDTH OF . - :INGRESS / EGRESS AREA 2. AGGREGATE .4' TO 8' CRUSHED BALLAST ROCK 3. E NIRANCE DIMENSIONS: THE AGGREGATE! LAYER MUST BE - AT LEAST 12 INCHES 1HH0(. IT MUST VEND THE FLAT MOTH OF THE VEHICULAR INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE MUST BE ATIEAST 50 FEET. 4. WASHING IF CONDITIONS ON THE STE OF THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM CONTACT WITH THE GRAVEL, THEN WASHED BEFORE VEHICLES ENTER A 17 STEEL HENCE POSTS FILTER FABRIC, MIRAF1 100X WRH.2 x2'x14 GA. W.W.F. BACIONG OR EQUAL. PLACE PEA GRAVEL OR 'i. COARSE SAND RUED SANDBAGS IN FRONT OF FILTER FABRIC TO BE STACKED MIN. 2 . BAGS HIGH, STAGGERED, RNTH . . NO. GAPS BETWEEN BAGS S1EU FENCE POSTS FILTER FABRIC STAPLED TO STAKES 0 6' O.C. WITH 1/2' MIN. LENGTH STAPLES PEA GRAVEL OR COARSE SAND FILLED SANDBAGS STACKED 2 BAGS H (MIN.) GRAVEL CKFILL FORD S BURIED FILTER FABRIC, WRAP AROUND GRAVEL BACKFILL INLET PROTECTION DETAIL SUCH THAT MOST. at TIRES BY IIRES MUST BE ROAD. WASH . WATER MUST BE CARRIED AWAY FROM ITjHE ENTRANCE TO A SETTING AREA TO REMOVE SEDIMENT. A WASH RAD( MAY :ALSO BE USED .10 MAKE WASHING MORE CONVENIENT AND EFFECTIVE 5. MAINTENANCE THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MNNTAMED IN A COMMON WHICH WIL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD INTO PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING NTH 2 -INCH STONE, AS CONDITIONS DEMAND, AND REPAIR AND /OR LEAN OUT ANY STRUCTURES USED To TRAP smart ALL MATERIALS SAUD, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLES ONTO ROADWAY OR INTO STORM DRAMS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. SNOHOMISH' COUNTY RLE # agtt:L Imo PERMIT SUBMITTAL