HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E04-012 - DECKER BRAD - WINNERS RESTAURANT DEMOLITIONSC -3 RETAIL BLDG
BRAD DECKER
17401 SC PY
E04 -012
•
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670
DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
File Number: E04 -012
Applied: 06/08/2004
Issue Date: 08/11/2004
Status: ISSUED
Applicant: BRAD DECKER Lead Agency: City of Tukwila
Description of Proposal:
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING 9,300 SQUARE FOOT WINNERS RESTAURANT, REGRADE AND EXCAVATION OF
APPROXIMATELY 3,000 CUBIC YARDS OF EARTH AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 20,200 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING.
Location of Proposal:
Address: 17401 SOUTHCENTER PY TUKW
Parcel Number: 2623049120
Section/Township/Range: 26/23/04
The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by dt AlagaS4aZOQ1 .
The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. �J
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official MP ate
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
(206)431 -3670
Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of
action unrelated-to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time
period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075)
doc: DNS
E04 -012 Printed: 08-11 -2004
Dept. Of Community .Development
City of Tukwila
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
/,
HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
Notice of Public Hearing
jtko
Determination of Non - Significance
Notice of Public Meeting.
t
Mitigated Determination of Non-
Significance
r- •
Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt
Determination of Significance & Scoping
Notice
,®(
Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt
Person requesting mailing:
Notice of Action
1 ( w
Planning Commission Agenda Pkt
Official Notice
Short Subdivision Agenda
Notice of Application
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt
Permit
__
_
FAX To Seattle Times
Classifieds
Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds
PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111
Other
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this lorL day of
year 2
in the
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM
Project Name: 1
�/ - `' V
`t—
r- •
Project Number:. ),:1)(-1-- OP.
Mailer's Signature: V ,
,®(
Person requesting mailing:
;W1/2,0..
1 ( w
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM
CHEOIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE P•IT MAILINGS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
() DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
() U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
() U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D.
() NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES
() OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
() DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV.
() DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE >
() DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.
() DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV
'DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION*
( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS
SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
() FIRE DISTRICT #11
() FIRE DISTRICT #2
() K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION
() K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC
K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE
( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY
() RENTON LIBRARY
() KENT LIBRARY
() CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
?Q (INVEST
( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
Qa PUGET SOUND ENERGY
() HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES
() KENT PLANNING DEPT
( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
() FIRE
( ) FINANCE.
() BUILDING
( ) MAYOR
() PUBLIC WORKS
() POLICE
( ) PLANNING
( ) PARKS & REC.
() CITY CLERK
SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES
UTILITIES
CITY AGENCIES
( ) HEALTH DEPT
() PORT OF SEATTLE
() K.C. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR
() K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL
() K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES
( ) FOSTER LIBRARY
() K C PUBLIC LIBRARY
()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE
( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( ) WATER DISTRICT #20
( ) WATER DISTRICT #125
( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT
( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT
() CITY OF SEA -TAC
( ) CITY OF BURIEN
( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU
( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE'
• NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ.
OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES
( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM
( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM
() WILDLIFE PROGRAM
MEDIA
( ) SEATTLE TIMES
( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL
P: \ADMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC
( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
ix•P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY
() SOUND TRANSIT
() DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION
'SEND NOTICE OF AU. APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER
( ) HIGHLINE TIMES
( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WVWV
PLOIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PTS
SEPA MAILINGS
Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing)
Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section
*Applicant
*Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list)
*Any parties of record
* send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination
KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand
Send These Documents to DOE:
SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper)
SHORELINE MAILINGS:
Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500
feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of
Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit
written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so
within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the
information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing.
Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision:
Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE)
Department of Ecology Shorelands Section
State Attorney General
*Applicant
*Indian Tribes
*Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list).
*Any parties of record
* send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination
Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General:
Permit Data Sheet
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report or memo)
Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
- Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements
— Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline
Grading Plan
— Vicinity map
SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra)
Findings (staff report or memo)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline
Notice of Application
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed)
P:\A DMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC
City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
File No: E04 -012
SC -3 Retail Building —17401 Southcenter PY
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION
II.
The proposal is to demolish the existing 9,300 square foot Winners restaurant; to regrade the
site excavating approximately 3,000 cubic yards; and to construct a new 20,200 square foot
building for five retail tenants on the 47,694 square foot site.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Name:
Applicant:
Location:
Zoning:
Comprehensive
Plan Designation:
SC -3 Retail Building
Brad Decker
17401 Southcenter PY
Tukwila Urban Center (TUC)
Tukwila Urban Center (TUC)
III. REVIEW PROCESS
The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does
not meet the exemptions listed under Part Nine — Categorical Exemptions (WAC 197 -11 -800.)
IV. BACKGROUND /PROPOSAL
The proposal is to demolish the existing 9,300square foot Winners restaurant, convert
approximate 9,000 square feet of pervious surface to impervious and construct a new 20,200
square foot building for retail tenants on a 47,694 square foot site along Southcenter PY.
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
• 1
Staff Report: E04 -012
17401 Southcenter Parkway: SC -3 Retail Building
The site is surrounded by and shares access to parking with two existing retail developments
– a furniture store to the north and a multi- tenant development to the west.
V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for
the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the
Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If
the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is
needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation.
A. BACKGROUND:
1 -4 -- Concur with checklist.
5- The demolition and construction will follow issuance of SEPA determination and after
obtaining all required permits from the City of Tukwila or other agencies.
6 -8 Concur with checklist.
9 —In addition to'a City of Tukwila Demolition permit, the applicant must obtain separate
permits from the Fire Department. The applicant is also responsible for contacting and
obtaining other permits from other state agencies.
10- 12— Concur with checklist.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:
1. Earth:
a -d -- Concur with checklist.
e. Applicant has modified the proposed grades for the site and will now be removing
approximately 3,000 cubic yards of earth.
f -h- Concur with checklist.
2. Air:
a – Applicant is required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound Clean Air
Agency to address any emission to the air that is typically due to the demolition
work..
b -c– Concur with checklist.
3. Water:
a(1)- a(3)— Concur with checklist.
Page 2 of 6
• •
Staff Report: E04 -012
17401 Southcenter Parkway: SC -3 Retail Building
a(4) Applicant proposes to reroute the existing North Canyon 36 inch storm
water line.
a(5) – a (6)
b(1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist.
c (1) – Existing utilities including storm drainage will be capped off during
demolition. The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual
drainage requirements. All impacts associated to drainage will be mitigated as part
of the demolition permit and construction permit. Increase in runoff is calculated to
be less than .4 cubic feet per second.
c (2) – Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction
debris enters the storm drainage system and subsequent to that the natural drainage
system. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of
demolition permit and the construction permit.
d -- Concur with checklist.
4. Plants:
a- Concur with checklist.
b. Approximately 9,000 square feet of landscaping will be removed.
c. Concur with checklist.
d. Applicant will be relandscaping in some of the parking areas. A portion of their
parking will not be relandscaped because of ownership issues.
5. Animals:
a- d— Concur with checklist.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
7. Environmental Health:
a – Concur with checklist.
a(1)— Hazardous Materials Control Systems may be required to be in place to
address any spills or clean up practices as part of demolition permit review.
a(2)— Concur with checklist.
b (1) -- Concur with checklist.
b(2) -b (3) –The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements.
Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate
any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a -k -- Concur with checklist.
1 - Cross sections were requested of the applicant to demonstrate appropriate
transitions to adjacent developed properties. Applicant chose to submit a revised grading plan that
Page 3 of 6
Staff Report: E04 -012
17401 Southcenter Parkway: SC -3 Retail Building
shows elevations similar to adjacent parcels. The Board of Architectural Review is required and will
review compatibility with surrounding land uses. See additional comments below under Public
Comments.
9. Housing:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
10. Aesthetics:
a- b— Concur with checklist.
c. The applicant's proposed measures may not be sufficient to control aesthetic
impacts. The Board of Architectural Review retains decision m aking
authority for overall design and compatibility of project per the City's
guidelines regarding compatibility with adjacent properties.
11. Light and Glare:
a- Applicant does not list parking lot illumination that is proposed for installation.
b -d -- Concur with checklist.
12. Recreation:
a- Concur with checklist
b- Eating 'at Winners will be displaced.
c – Concur with checklist.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
14. Transportation:
a. Several additional routes of travel other than I -5 or I -405 can provide access the
site. Access from the south and east is via arterial streets such as S. 180 St. will also
serve some percentage of the vehicle trips.
b - The site is served by Metro #155 that provides hourly daily service to Fairwood
in Renton and the Southcenter Mall via S. 180 St. and Southcenter PY.
c -g— Concur with checklist. See additional comments below under Public
Comments.
15. Public Services:
a -b =- Concur with checklist.
16. Utilities:
a -b -- Concur with checklist.
V. Public Comment
Page 4 of 6
Staff Report: E04 -012
17401 Southcenter Parkway: SC -3 Retail Building
Two comment letters have been received regarding the project.
1. Ethan Allen, the tenant and property owner to the north of the site had the following
concerns /comments:
a. Additional parking lot lighting is requested to respond to multiple car break -ins and
low parking light levels;
b. Pedestrian markings are needed in order to alert motorists to pedestrian crossings
between the parking on the north of the site to the businesses south of a common
access drive;
c. The current stop sign for cars exiting the site onto Southcenter PY is unreadable and
should be replaced;
d. Existing parking lot plantings are dead and should be replaced or upgraded;
e. Concern about the visibility of garbage /trash area; and
f. The need for a traffic signal or right turn only at common drive between the Ethan
Allen and Winners due to existing traffic conditions and safety issues.
Staff Response: The traffic report prepared by Transpo did not identify the subject intersection as
being a safety concern or as needing a warrant analysis for a traffic signal. The proposed project will
result in a net decrease in vehicular trips. Motorists have the alternative of using the common access
drive to get to the signal to the south for turning left. The stop sign is on private property on a
common access easement
The other issues are design review issues and will be addressed during the Board of Architectural
Review process.
2. JoAnn opposes the project for aesthetic and parking purposes.
a. The proposed project will build along the front of the existing Jo -Ann's store and
locate the trash and recycling area opposite (approximately 50 feet from) the Jo-
Ann's entrance;
b. The proposed project will limit visibility of two tenant spaces from the street because
they will be behind the proposed structure. The two tenants are currently Jo -Ann and
Borders.
c. The existing situation allows shared parking between the restaurant and the Jo -Ann
store whereas the proposed project eliminates the parking currently located in front
of their entrance causing customers to park on the side of the building.
Staff Response: The issues are design review issues and will be addressed during the Board of
Architectural Review process.
Page 5 of 6
Staff Report: E04 -012
17401 Southcenter Parkway: SC -3 Retail Building
VI. CONCLUSION
The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the
environment and pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -340, a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
is issued for this project
This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments,
and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. E03- 008 ", and is supported by
plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by city of Tukwila for the exercise of
substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions.
Prepared by: Moira Carr Bradshaw, Senior Planner
Date: August 11, 2004
Page 6 of 6
irMoira Bradshaw -17401 Southcenter P'
Page 1
From: Moira Bradshaw
To: Jill Mosqueda
Date: 8/9/04 5:07PM
Subject: 17401 Southcenter PY
Hi Jill - I didn't mention this but I'm hoping to get any response you might have to the comment letters we
received on the above project. I particularly interested in your response to the two comments concerning
traffic.
1. That the stop sign should be replaced (it is faded an unreadable)
and
2. Traffic signal /right turn only at the driveway between Winners and Ethan Allen. ( Has there been any
warrant analysis and or what would trigger a warrant analysis?
Thanks.
CC: Cyndy Knighton
JOi&N
Ju1y.;28; :2004
stores inc®
VIA
vEl
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, #100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Attn: Moira Carr Bradshaw -
Dear Moira Carr Bradshaw:
•
Robert D. Icsman
Senior Legal Counsel
Direct Dial: (330) 463 -3409
Direct Fax: (330) 463 -6660
Email: roberticsman@jo- annstores.com
Re: Notice. of Application dated July 14 2004
17401 Southcenter Parkway
Demolition of 9,300 square foot Winners Restaurant
Please be advised that Jo -Ann Stores, Inc. opposes the application to demolish the 9,300 square
foot building and to replace it with a multi -tenant retail building. Replacing the single -tenant
building with a multi -tenant building that is double the size of the restaurant will:; create an
aesthetics problem and create a parking problem for our customers.
Based on the drawings that we have seen, it is our belief that the front of the Jo -Ann store will
face the rear (i.e., trash area) of the proposed multi -tenant building. We have not determined
exactly how close our store will be to the trash area of the multi -tenant building, but regardless of
the distance, it will not be a pleasant view: Furthermore, we believe that it does not serve the
interests of the community to have two retail buildings so close to each other.
Additionally, the new multi -tenant building will create visibility issues for the public traveling on
Southcenter Parkway. The new building will likely prevent our - customers from seeing our store.
Finally, the new multi -tenant building will eliminate the parking in front of our store and force
our customers to park on the side of the building, or to. park on the side of the new building and
cross the access road.
We look forward to sharing additional information with the City at the public hearing. Please
send me a notice of the time:and place for the public hearing.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Robert D. Icsman
Senior Legal Counsel
RDI:bat
cc: ; :. Kevin Kneeshaw, RVP
John Stec
tPecrrk4 Corporate Office and Distribution Center
5555 Darrow Road, Hudson, Ohio 44236, Phone 330 - 656 -2600, www.joann.com
ETHAN
ALLEN
HOME INTERIORS
ETHAN ALLEN HOME INTERIORS
An Autho tharhAllen Retailer
SOUTHCENTER'i's ,
17333 Southcenter._Parkway
Tukwila,:WA 98188u.
206- 57514366
s ..
1- 800 7518 =7647
Fax 206 =575 -0377 '•
r
BELLEVUE /REDMOND
2209 N.E. Bel -Red Road
Redmond, WA 98052
425 - 641 -3133
1- 877- 633 -8426
Fax 425 - 603 -9082
- Moira Carr Bradshaw
Associate Planner
Department of Community Development
CITY OF TUKWILA
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Moira:
LYNNWOOD
4029 Alderwood Mall Blvd.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
425 -775 -1 901
1- 888 - 205 -0310
Fax 425 -712 -9831
SERVICE CENTER
20120 72nd Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
253 - 872 -6552
1- 800 - 859 -3085
Fax 253- 872 -6755
A
J(C Fey#
000��y.f,, o
July 27, 2004 & p4,tiry.
This letter contains our written comments on the proposed 20,200 square foot retail
building at 17401 Southcenter Parkway, at the current Winners Restaurant location. We
are the retail store located directly North of the project on Southcenter Parkway.
I have attached a copy of a site plan labeled SC -3 Retail Building, dated June 8, 2004.
To simplify my comments, I have placed numbers on the site plan that correspond with
the following comments and concerns:
1. and 2. The site plan calls for the removal of two existing lights. In my opinion it will
be necessary to replace these under - performing lights with newer, taller, more powerful
lights. We have experienced multiple break -ins to our employee and customer cars
during the past year, and the more light on the surrounding property, the better.
3. This corner is very dark in the winter months, and I believe an additional light (as
above) is needed. It is especially important that pedestrians crossing over from our
property to the new retail stores can be easily seen by the cars turning in from
Southcenter Parkway.
4. I believe some type of marked cross walk, and a stop sign is needed here to help
pedestrians cross the common access drive. A speed bump might also help.
5. The current stop sign here is faded and needs to be painted or replaced.
6. I'm not sure who is responsible for the plantings in front of the 20 existing parking
stalls. This area needs to be replanted or upgraded, and if the new retail shops are
• •
responsible, I believe a sprinkler system should be in place so that the plantings remain
healthy.
7. I want to make sure that any garbage bins, etc. are fully hidden.
8. My concern is that it will be easier for the new retail customers to park in front of our
building and walk to the shops, rather than park in the existing 20 stalls or in back of the
new retail stores. Parking near my number 1 light or in back of the proposed building is
much farther away from the front doors of the new retail than parking at my number 8
parking area, and it's only human nature to take the shortest distance in most parking
situations. I'm not sure what the answer is here and I'm very concerned that there won't
be enough parking places for all customers —it's already hard to find parking during peak
times. Currently Winners has multiple small and one large sign that says "Winners
Parking" at my numbers 1, 6, and 2. locations, but Winners' customers rarely park in
these spaces. Personally I am not in favor of having labeled parking spaces, as
consumers tend to park where they want, no matter what a sign says.
9. It is virtually impossible to come out of our parking lot and make a left turn onto
Southcenter Parkway today. With the increased traffic this just gets more difficult. One
solution would be a traffic light, the other solution a "right turn only" sign. I have
witnessed many traffic accidents at this location, and the increased traffic will make this
worse.
In general I am not opposed to the concept of new retail, but I want to ensure that
pedestrians are safe and that there is enough parking at the right locations.
Please put me on any future mailings as this project progresses. The Service Center
address above is the best way to communicate with me, or at bcr(a,seattle- ethanallen.com
Cordially,
Brad Renner
President
Enclosure: Site Plan
Copy: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor
C 7 azi forks..
ilroi a' Bradshaw - Re: E04 -012 SC -3
From: Cyndy Knighton
To: Jill Mosqueda
Date: 7/12/04 11:14AM
Subject: Re: E04 -012 SC -3
IF the Winner's Restaurant building has been vacant for under 12 months, the trip generation credit is
acceptable. If it's been more than a year, than we've not given credit for existing trips. I concur with the
report's analysis on parking layout. Required number of stalls is zoning /planning controlled but it seems
from a parking generation viewpoint, the parking onsite is adequate.
Cyndy
»> Jill Mosqueda 7/12/04 10:37:57 AM »>
Yes, On July 1st I put the report with a memorandum attached in your mailbox. And last week, I reminded
you of it. So let me know when you can get to it.
Thanks.
L. Jill Mosqueda P.E.
»> Cyndy Knighton 07/12/04 09:48AM »>
Jill, what is this? Have you given me something to look at?
»> Jill Mosqueda 7/12/04 8:07:53 AM »>
Please give me an ETA for your responses to this traffic analysis. The project is proposing a new access
onto the shared access. This access is closer to SCPkwy Than the previous. I am interested to know if
this is an acceptable location.
L. Jill Mosqueda P.E.
• The
Transpo
Group
Joanna Spencer, City of Tukwila
Brandon Moen
Tasha Atchison, P.E.
Brad Decker, Decker Development
1 7401 Southcenter Parkway Retail: Traffic Assessment
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide a brief traffic assessment of the
proposed retail development to be located at 17401 Southcenter Parkway in Tukwila,
Washington. The scope of this memorandum is based on feedback from the City of
Tukwila staff provided by the project's developer to Transpo. This traffic assessment
addresses the following areas identified as key by City staff:
• Site Trip Generation
• On -site Parking Supply /Demand
• Parking Layout Operations
Project Summary
The proposed development would remove an existing 9,300 square foot sit -down
restaurant located at 17401 Southcenter Parkway and replace it with approximately
19,500 square feet of general retail space. The project would supply 80 parking stalls
on -site. A site plan for the project is shown in Attachment 1.
Trip Generation
In order to better understand the traffic implications of the proposed project, trip
generation estimates were prepared for the existing restaurant on -site as well as the
proposed retail space. The difference between the two represents the net impact of
the proposed development. Trip generation estimates were developed for a typical
weekday, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour.
Trip generation estimates were developed using ITE Trip Generation (7h Edition). For
the existing restaurant, the average trip rate for Land Use # 932 (High Turnover Sit -
Down Restaurant) was used, while the average rate for Land Use # 820 (Shopping
Center) was used for the proposed project. Appropriate pass -by trip rate
considerations were made for both land uses based on the ITE Trip Generation
Handy (2001). Pass -by rates are not provided for daily or AM peak hour time
periods, so the provided PM peak hour rates were used (43% for High Turnover Sit -
down Restaurant, 34% for Shopping Center).
Table 1 shows the estimated existing trip generation, the proposed project's trip
generation, and the resulting net new trips.
The Transpo Group 11730118th Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034 -7120 425.821.3665 Fax:
425.825.8434
•
Table 1
• The
Transpo
Group
Peak�Hour
Total Trips
less pass -by'
Net New Trips
Total Trips
less pass -by'
Net New Trips
Total Net New Trips
Total Net New Pass -by
4Tdta
837 418
284 142
553 276
1,182
508
674
591
254
337
-121 -61
-224 -112
419
142
277
591
254
337
-60
-112
20
6
14
107
46
61
-47
-40
12
3
9
56
23
33
-24
-20
8
3
5
51
23
28
-23
-20
Total;
73
24
49
102
44
58
-9
-20
i r
ene io TtOydit orpt.Shpmgr nu „t s�14O1 a' ,Us $ A veragetTr p�Rate
riGrne Hiii* tk Cn 820) • a iai
tp•Gen iron, 7thEd(tton HighurnoverSITawn etaurat- tLaiidU 982} s Q verak g e1 Fi ri p R a
t' e
ip ln ration Hdboo HlgTurnaetisiG -do R aur f (tndse 93. }- P ea'Rt
�
35
12
23
62
22
40
-17
-10
38
12
26
40
22
18
8
-10
As is shown in Table 1, the proposed retail development would result in less primary
and pass -by vehicle trips over the course of a typical weekday, as well as in the AM
and PM peak hours. For instance, during the PM peak hour, the proposed project
would result in nine less new trips, and twenty less pass -by trips. Based on these
estimates, the proposed retail development is anticipated to generate less traffic than
the current land use on -site. Thus, the traffic impacts to the site driveway and area
intersections should be less than if the restaurant were to remain.
On -Site Parking
The adequacy of the proposed parking supply for the project was compared to the
estimated peak parking demand for such a land use. ITE Parking Generation (2nd
Edition) was used to estimate the peak weekday and Saturday parking demand. The
average peak parking demand rates for Land Use # 820 (Shopping Center) were used
to estimate the parking demand for the proposed project. The current site plan
proposes a supply of 80 parking stalls to be located on -site. Table 2 compares the
proposed parking supply to the calculated peak demand on both a weekday and
Saturday.
The Transpo Group
RECEIVED
JUN 0 91004
COMM
O�ELOPM T
page 2
• The
Transpo
Group
Table 2
Proposed Parking Supply
Projected Peak Demand'
Parking Surplus
80
63
+17
80
77
+3
" i Cen�tlanc(2nd; t Av eP rk1
man - S�h��o�ytf f eni t aed(a 820 )
-*RSV 4. AIM .iYTYY+il.41� t+
As is shown in Table 2, the project's proposed parking supply of 80 stalls exceeds the
estimated peak demand by 17 and 3 stalls on weekdays and Saturdays, respectively.
Based on this comparison, the proposed parking supply on -site should adequately
serve the proposed retail project.
Beyond those stalls noted in Table 2, additional parking associated with developments
to the south would also be available for use, though they were not assumed available
in the calculated supply.
Parking Layout Operations
Transpo has been asked to provide comments regarding the current parking lot and
access configuration proposed for the site and evaluate parking circulation and
operations. The most recent site plan provided shows that the site will access the
shared driveway on the north edge of the site, which then intersects with Southcenter
Parkway to the east. The parking aisle that serves the majority of on -site parking is
proposed to be located approximately 40 feet west of Southcenter Parkway. Such a
configuration aligns the proposed driveway aisle with the driveway aisle for the
development directly to the north. The existing restaurant drive aisle is approximately
75 feet west of Southcenter Parkway.
While there is the possibility that a parked vehicle backing out of one of the
development's parking stalls near the north of the lot may block the entry of an
inbound vehicle to the site, there is a low likelihood for such a conflict given the
project's anticipated trip generation. Even if such a conflict did occur with a vehicle
parked in the most northerly parking stall on -site, a queue of at least two vehicles
would be able to form in the driveway throat before the queue would reach
Southcenter Parkway. Given that such a chain reaction of conflicts is unlikely, no
additional safety issues are anticipated due to the proposed drive aisle location be
moved approximately 35 feet closer to Southcenter Parkway.
The Transpo Group
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
GUMMUNITY
DCBPMENT
• • The
Transpo
Group
The existing drive aisle for the development to the north was previously approved
with a similar alignment and spacing in relation to Southcenter Parkway. It would be
advantageous for the existing private access aisle to the north and the proposed
project's access aisle to align with one another to form an internal intersection, rather
than create two off -set intersections along the shared driveway. No other substantial
issues appear to be an issue with the site plan as currently proposed.
We trust that this memorandum addresses the issues requested by City staff. Please
let us know if you have any questions or comments.
M \04 \04005 17401 Southcenter Parkway \WP \04005m1.doc
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
DEOMMUNITY
VELOPMENT
The Transpo Group page 4
SC-3 RETAIL BUILDING
SITE AREA:
BLDG. AREA: 19.483sf
ON SITE PARKING: 60
ADJACENT PARKING: 20
TOTAL PARKING: 80
17401 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
Attachment 1
Site Plan
17401 Southcenter Parkway Retail
RECEIVED
'JUN 09 2004
COMMUNITY --
DEVELOPMENT
N
NOT TO SCALE
The
Transpo.
Group
;
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
17401 Southcenter Pkwy
BY
SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
310 208th ST. SE
BOTHELL 98012
425 -481 -9687
June 3, 2004
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Section Title Number
Project Overview
Preliminary Conditions Summary II
Offsite Analysis III
Treatment Design IV
Conveyance systems Analysis and Design V(not used)
Special Reports and Studies VI(not used)
Other Permits VII(not used)
Erosion /Sedimentation Control Design VIII
Bond Quantities and Other Forms IX(to be provided)
Maintenance & Operations Manual X
RECE,VED
f UN 0 9 2004
D� LopM N
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Consisting of about 0.97 acres, the site is developed with a restaurant building
and asphalt parking; however, the easterly 45 feet, more or less, is landscaped.
This project will remove the existing building and parking and construct a new
retail building. Parking will be predominantly in the front (the east side), but will
also be along all three of the other sides. Approximately 0.1 acres of existing
parking area to the south will be modified and is included in the development
area for this report. The increase in impervious area for the entire development
area is 10,879 square feet. By virtue of Exemption Number 4 to Core
Requirement Number 3, detention will not be required. The enclosed
calculations demonstrate that the increase in runoff from the two natural
discharge areas is Tess than 0.1 cfs and the increase in runoff from the entire site
(which is a single threshold discharge area) will be less than 0.4cfs. A complete
discussion is included in the pertinent sections of this report.
Access to the site will be from a common driveway located on the north side of
the site.
Sanitary sewer will be connected to the existing side sewer on the west side of
the site, and water will be provided using the existing meter. Since the new retail
building will have a much lesser demand than the existing restaurant, the size of
the existing services will be adequate.
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMNIUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
SECTION 1
PROJECT OVERVIEW
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 200
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
King Co�Tnty Department of Development and. EnviFonmental Services
TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (T1R) WORKSHEET
Part:1 PROJECT OWNER AND
PROJECT ENGINEER.
Project Owner
etOpt:>5 \TU�bc'
4-o'c`
Address i1.7 5c. 6
Z''F X3
Phone
"2- O G ^ 5-46- 4,9."
Project Engineer
Company 9=‘+-e \betL • Q45'0r,tcrc,
Address /Phone 6 :c �' 1(1 (4)$4 q 970
4 of ( -9G r'7
. Part'3' TYPEOFPERMIT
..APPLI.CATION`
Subdivison
Short Subdivision
Grading
Commercial
Other
Part.2. PROJECT LOCATION AND
DESCRIPTION.
Project Name
5'4
Location
Township
Range 4-
5(.4) l -.Section
1_1
• Part-4. • :OTHER: REVIEWSAND. PERMITS,
DFW HPA
COE 404
DOE Dam Safety
FEMA Floodplain
COE Wetlands
Shoreline Management
Rockery
Structural Vaults
Other
Part 5..S1TECOMMUNIT' AND:DRAINAGEBASIN::
Community r ``
TvKutF °ta,
Drainage Basin
Of
t
Kt"
n
Part 6 SITE_CHARACTERISTICS.
River
Stream
Critical Stream Reach
Depressions /Swales
Lake
Steep Slopes
Floodplain
Wetlands
Seeps /Springs
High Groundwater Table
Groundwater Recharge
Other
RECEIVED
IJUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Part ? SOILS
( Soil Type , Slopes
Pr
Additional Sheets Attached
Erosion Potential Erosive Velcoties
Part& DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS
REFERENCE
Ch. 4 — Downstream Analysis
Additional Sheets Attached
LIMITATION /SITE CONSTRAINT
Part>9 :ESCREQUIREMENTS. >-
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
DURING CONSTRUCTION
Sedimentation Facilities
/Stabilized Construction Entrance
.rimeter Runoff Control
Clearing and Graing Restrictions
over Practices
Construction Sequence
Other
MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS
AFTER CONSTRUCTION
Stabilize Exposed Surface
'emove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities
a--Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris
�nsure Operation of Permanent Facilities
Flag Limits of SAO and open space
preservation areas
Other
RECEIVED
/JUN 0 9 2084
pEVELOP j6N r
•
Part 10 SURFACEWATER SYSTEM
Grass Lined
Channel
�ipe System
Open Channel
Dry Pond
Wet Pond
Tank Infiltration
Vault Depression
Energy Dissapator Flow Dispersal
Wetland Waiver
Stream Regional
Detention
Method of Analysis
(Cc
Compensation /Mitigati
on of Eliminated Site
Storage
Brief Description of System Operation
Facility Related Site Limitations
Reference Facility
Limitation
P it +11 STRUCTU.RAL.ANALYSIS
Cast in Place Vault
Retaining Wall
Rockery > 4' High
Structural on Steep Slope
Other
Part12I EASEMENTS/TRACTS
Drainage Easement
Access Easement
Native Growth Protection Easement
Tract
Other
PartM13;: SIGNATURE
OF PROFESSIONAL. ENGINEER
I or a civil engineer under my supervision my supervision have visited the site. Actual site
conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of
my knowledge the information provided here is accurate.
Signed/Date
oao
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
ocom NT
51
S 1;57T11 ST
•i"
'ill!
3 1661 h S1
.-•
A s i131.1 1 II S A .'.i.iTI
z
_, I S1 •
ST I . 1 ...,,...i.
'2ND
■-=.
7.51 h
1.1
n
c
(r)
S1 RANDE R BLVD " '10.114.11
SOIT All/TEP
= "
(--)
m u it; f L 424
; 1 RE C K ND& -.. • )
1 .■
N
'.-§ DR ..1'
/‘ 2
--G ,e'—'—,‘
70 1 ' r.., :
' .• -s
P1 ;r,i:.7 -< .„. ....
7C •.: • AI;F Tokhli.4: (
.3; ,;1--..c..". 77
I. .1 -.. ....
.j 1 ./
-0 :',1::•,1..1. 1
-< PC..9, Pet-Ui . ... L-1 A. .-
FS
■• •
X) -...
51
S 172ND FL.
51
11113 LEP
CONFORM"
I.)12 N
CORPORA rc
oP s
—voL
1.-111.1/41" /611-At3&Y - ,[1g
.1 IIv1
REA
- ,.,..
S 1761H Si
r, . , • ..'Z' .: '' •:-.' ear
.
177TII vi 1 LAKE
PK
.73711 ST ;Ii.' ''' r '
-•:., • .. ' ,
1 7 t •
Mil ANL)
WE Te
i•
'SAX N DR
fR IL D
S 180TH ST
„.
flTTE
SIT
ryCps oc
op
1
VICINITY MAP
N TS
I # •C'" .
• • •
• # • I: li• / • '1
• "U
•1.
co •
• 1'1
11
,.--:
ii, 1,
1..-,-..1:-
..i 1 :--. •
..i. 1 . " L Ji
• : , ;,;.-:_ill...1,--,
IV
••• JUN.
.•
."'._i ji,.;••--_,>.,.---.-1—•
1' •
. .
''..'i -,. ....
(J uifts shuel )
RENTON 2.6 All.
10 1111. 1.0 INTERS 1A 1 E gi)
RENTON
•
SOIL LEGEND
The first capital letter is the initial one of the soil name. A second capital letter,
A, B, C, D, E, or F, indicates the closs of slope. Symbols without a slope letter
ore those of nearly level soils.
SYMBOL NAME
Ag8 Alderwood gravelly sandy loom, 0 to 6 percent slooes
AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 ro 15 percent slopes
AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes
AkF Alderwood and Kirsap soils, very steep
An,B Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes •
AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes ••
An Arents, Everett material •
BeC Beausire grovelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
B.D Beovsire gravelly sandy loam, 15 ro 30 percent slopes
BeF Beausire gravelly sandy loom, 40 to 75 percent slopes
Bh Bellingham silt loam
Br Briscot silt loam
Bu Buckley silt loom
Cb Coastal Beaches
Ea Eorlmonr silt loam
Ed Edgewick fine sandy loom
Ev6 Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes
EvC Everett gravelly sandy loom, 5 to 15 percent slopes
EvD Everett gravelly sandy loom, 15 to 30 percent slopes
EwC Everett- Alderwood gravelly sandy looms, 6 to 15 percent slopes
InA Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
InC Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes
InD Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 Percent slooes
KpB Kirsop silt loam, 2 ro 8 percent slooes
KpC Kirsao silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slooes
KpD Kirsap silt loom, 15 to 30 percent slopes
KsC Klous gravelly loamy sond; 6 to 15 percent slopes
Ma Mixed alluvial land
• NeC Neilton very gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 15 percent slooes
Ng Newberg's ilt loom
Nk Nooksack silt loom
No Norma sandy loam
Or Orcas peat
Os Oridio silt loam
OvC Ovall gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes
OvD Ovall gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
OvF Ovall gravelly loom, 40 to 75 percent slopes
Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand
Pk Pilchuck fine sondy loam
Pu Puget silty clay loom
Py Puyallup fine sandy loam
RoC Rognor fine sondy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes
RoD Rognor fine sandy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes
RdC Rognor- Indianola association, sloping •
RdE Rognor- Indianola association, moderately steep •
Re Renton silt loam
Rh Riverwash
So Salal silt loam
Sh Sammomish silt loam
Sk Seattle muck
Sm Shalcar muck
Sn Si silt loam
So Snohomish silt loom
Sr Snohomish silt loom, thick surface - variant
Su Sultan silt loam
Tu Tukwila muck
•".".""jiliii. Ur Urban land
Wo Woodinville silt loom
• The composition of these units is more variable than that of the others
in the area, but it has been controlled well enough to interpret for the
expected use of the soils.
•
• CONVENTIONAL SIGN,
Boundary, national ... .... ........ Hord surface. heavy dury road, fnur .,r more lanes
Hora surfnce, heavy dury road. rwn or three lanes.
County, Parish.
- Hard surfoce medium dury rood, four .,r more trines
.,,v,l rownsnip, precinct, ,own, barrio... Hard surface. :neaium dury road, two or three tones...
Incorporated city, village, rown, hamlet ........ Improved light dury rood
Reservation, national or store ............ Unimproved dirt road and trail.. ...
Small pork, cemetery, airport, etc ...... ...... .. Dual highway, iiv'ding strip 25 feet or Less
Land grant ...................... .... ..._ Dual highway, dividing strip exceeding 25 fee,
Townshio or range line, United Stares land survey.. Pead under construction...... .....
Township or range line, approximate location
Section line. Unired Stores land survey .. Pailrood, single 'rack and mulriole 'rack.
Section line, approximare locarion _ Poi:roads in juxraoosirion..
Township line, not United Stores land survey Narrow gage, single track and multiple track
S..ecrion line, nor United $races land survey... - - - -- - - - - - - -- - Pei irnod .. street and carline.
Section corner, found and indicated...... ▪ Bridae. road and railroad..
Boundary monument: land cranr and urher 0 o Drawbridge, road and railroad....
United Stares mineral or location monument.......... .. �rorbndge ............... ..... .. ...
� e=
r I t
I II
a0t
Sri rt. St
s=1,SZSIS=M=1.mr
Buildings (dwelling, place of ernoloyrnent, erc 1
SCnooi, urf , .3nd cemetery
Buildings (born, warehouse, erc.) - - - -- 00
Power transmission line ........................... ...
Telephone line, pipeiine, erc. (labeled as to rype). -
Nells other roan water (labeled os ro rype)....... oOil �n oGas
Tanks, oil, water, erc. ;labeled as to type).. - .. . -• • • •Water Perennial screams ........... ........
Locored or landmark object; windmill .0 5 Intermittent streams....
Perennial lake or pond
Horizontal and vertical conrrol station: Inrerm.rrenr lake rr pund....
Tablet, spirit level elevation .................... BMA 3899 Disappearing stream
Other recoverable mark, spirit ievei eievar,on 03938 = aueaucr runner
Horizontal control srarion: cooler, vertical angle elevation VABM A2914 '1arer well aria spring,
Any recoverable mark, verrical angle or checked elevation A5675 :.'arsh (swamp) ................
Vertical control srarion: raoler. oplc,r level elevarior, BM X 945
.211r in
;-E; Cern
vim
Tunnel, road and railroad.. ......
Overpass and undercass...
moorranr smail masonry nr norrn nom
Dom wvn Intl,
Com with road......
nano, with lack ..
Other recoverable mark, spirit level elevation X 890 Soil boundary and symbol.........
f7.hecked soot elevation....... ..... 5923 Escaromenr other than bedrock .....
Unchecked soar elevation cna waver elevation 370 Pir, mine, ur quarry ............
.. ,rrrryrrrrrr.Hrltr
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
SECTION II
PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
RECEIVED
1JUN 0 9 2004
pCF1oPMETMNT'
• •
PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS SUMMARY
No conditions of approval have been created by the City for this project, so this
section will only address the core and special requirements.
CORE REQUIREMENTS
Discharge at the Natural Location:
The existing site discharges in two locations, thus forming two natural discharge
areas. On system is on the north side of the site and drains off of the site at the
north east corner. The other system is in the alley on the south west corner of
the site. It discharges to the east a short distance south of the site. The
completed site will drain to the same locations.
Offsite Analysis:
All drainage systems in and around the site are fully developed and consist of
storm drain pipes. See Section III for a full description.
Flow Control:
By virtue of Exemption Number 4,. Urban Redevelopment, detention is not
required for the project. This exemption is met as follows:
1. The increase in runoff from each of the two natural discharge areas is less
than .0.1cfs, and the increase in runoff from the single threshold discharge
area is under 0.4cfs.
2. Flow control BMPs will be added to the new impervious area by using
perforated tightline connections for the roof downspouts. For the parking
lot areas, a rock filled trench is proposed to enhance infiltration while
carrying the runoff from the east parking lot to Stormceptor #1. This will
give about 9,035 square feet of PGIS a chance to infiltrate. Since the
project will actually decrease the PGIS by 3,081 square feet, this will be
an improvement to the existing conditions.
3. There are no landslide hazard areas or erosion hazard areas within the
project, and no known severe flooding or erosion problems will be affected
by the project.
4. The manner in which runoff will leave the site will not create a significant
adverse impact per Core Requirement #1.
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
4'
• •
Conveyance System:
A complete backwater analysis was not done, as the runoff from the site is
distributed as it was in the predeveloped conditions. The new areas being
directed to the Stormceptor units are small, with the largest being 0.34 acres.
Using the rational formula with C =0.9 and an intensity of 3.0, the flow is 0.92cfs.
The capacity of an 8 inch smooth wall pipe at 0.5% is 0.87cfs. This is very close
to the 0.92cfs, so no flooding will occur.
Erosion and Sediment Control:
No sediment trap or pond is required, as the size of the site and the length of
runoff are too small. Other BMP's are proposed. See Section VII.
Maintenance and Operations:
Maintenance requirements are provided in Section X.
Financial Guarantees and Liability:
All required guarantees will be provided when requested.
Water Quality:
Water quality is required, as the new and disturbed PGIS is over 5,000 square
feet. Per discussions with City staff, treatment can be provided with
Stormceptors. The sizing of the units is included in Section IV.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Other Adopted Area - Specific Requirements:
No such areas are known to affect this site.
Floodplain /Floodway Delineation:
The site does not contain, nor is it adjacent to a stream, lake, wetland, or closed
depression
Flood Protection Facilities:
The site is not adjacent to a Class 1 or 2 stream, nor does is propose to
construct a new or modify and existing flood protection facility.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Source Controls:
No special controls should be required for the site, as no significant sources of
storm water pollution are proposed.
Oil Control:
This is not a high use site, nor is it redeveloping an existing high use site.
Therefore, special oil control measures are not required.
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
rr i �
Gam' / r/ 1. �O!`'�+�, +r-
i�
.3
•
r;
9
i4- LA) 1 -' ra „ *
it c0,441•(- c.'ovt s
•
,, / r r
i 4-r d
a O tl �Ti-
P (< Q
o -L -i:'f ,_ t
• r •r
z ct,r. •
TO "t"-C.(
4 i 2.. v' ` �t<?r7 4‹-
,014- 3 � 1.014c.
i
j G pis' /�
`yv
C! 2Q,"`'`
1.0Z4-c— D. -1 = 4 (' 44
1,44' fV' c.Kc.1 -1'
4,-to
Xr rikvl 4-9 tr I
74-+P-42 $ .
rwLpev-.t 1:0 uS I5- (=OC ,
mil.1.'0V 1? es 75`; (D,3D 14'4.
ro 47e. (: 28, 4.95' ^.:.,674
ft s a'
v
ra �� : • r 7, 14Z'°' Q.0.4f 4c)
VIA/
RECEIVED
1JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
1
•
\
-....',... ,..; N. . .„ ... . .
,,,/,..;,, • 7 9-■
.......,
7/ ■E NW 20 11 36"
/GE
1 S .61....
;E --------
. 4 -- \--
----- >D'---•'--''--SD'----------5C7r---------"-S....°,•-'7------;. SC) sb ,
,. ---,..' -a'=-Tm=-'1,-,,..8,v--+ 2- ------ -"C-r.:,;-anT - - - - - - --- 1
., ..,a ...NW
— — — — 4—N2:932.228.1J 11 — _,.
',/' .,P
,........,
..,. ..., F .—
,,, Go II A -
•••( ■ :07 7' \
2- ' \ 1
• 1 1 .8\1,
'l a' .
1 ' k
1 \ 1
1
\\ • \ \
I ' 1
1 \ \
1 '
1 . ,
,
\ ' '•••!,`, 21
P-5
•
.:a e
, 210,
if 'w 27 79 5-
y8TNI t5.53
25.6-7 1
1E 8 15.37 +5'
W 17.17 38'
17 SW '9.87 5-
arm 15.17
•
52,10?
Ran 30.59
Wtr• 28.89
'0
111 it.ot
1 \
I 1.-
1
CEr.
„."
aim 25.4)
Conenete
. .• .
. I
/ No auiod Easement as
/ c'er Ethibits F
i.rfl 9507;10282
,,a,P •
I C3 Type 1
C a. -3.56
G7:256166
C 81M 25.36
V
.7y
T.,De
/GE 25.81
.7 5 23.51 73'
W 23.51
17' -p 976 22
9-3 • .,35.25 ' , •IE
eiwcrete C43•111,(14p
,AFtl 2507210282 \
SO SD-
,
C8 Type •
\ a 20.49
vE NW 25.19 12'
E E 25.09 12'
876 23.09
ILc.+urQt tr�r&Le L3cis ins
\" _Castel
-0 LE-
_
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 20011
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
fL C-0 PO'f
`••
A ''v C S 6.0 to 't" r
Aosfck&N etc Pec
er\z. ; 31, � ?1.° � C �t t'Z 4G
P.Q r co vs . 4, 4- 5"_s"° ( 0 ► i S-
Ta 4- c)431' (La 4
N c,.4u ra i
17v'sccia►r4e A raa3
t'V L/s
P ltC VS
4
So erq v,S
P4-`r V$
I ■A Cr-4 tAse
z -7 2` a . 5'14
2.1_12? ( 0 ,t7 7A e)
2 el ( . 64, 4c>
14: i9.tC0.33 A
C6g-
v 1c9 42°` (0.4 ( 4c.,).
pa s t ds.Vl L pod s �4
) s ti1•i k ���sl ( kr in' ps )
p 2 -10 0?' 1docu 4 G ]re
kr' e..f D k'�
.t
S,t
.r
SOt)`-ti
4rcG..S
•
LntOyr C.* c,J5 ; (5e-4
rtA carp Q,re.,
!moo sf. eNt ;
R' .L•■4,i
rK 'r a 4S4
`i .(or f o.5
Or'.
PoS
u. o
t '•"1 S ere • \ �t V f ,`S. +'tTN!! .VA 10
Kcr2.r5 .Cs r
.e u 4,47 17,1303 �r
Litre. a el
�; . ,`•J.4c� k zrVrs go
o.-i 4,
0,o!. aLZ,
tAIS
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
of �-GG
0,4.0
0 o
• •
NORTH BASIN NATURAL DISCHARGE DATA
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : Alaraw.tsf
Regional Scale Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series File :C:\KC_SVDM\KC_DATA\STTG6OR.rnf 8
Till Grass 0.07 acres Scaling Yr: 8
Loading Time Series File :C:\KC_SJDH\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8
Impervious 0.59 al....cmz. Adding Yr: 8
Total Area:_.,__ 0.66 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.294 CF-Tat 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series File:norpos.tsf 8
---"-Time Series Computed
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : norpre.tsf
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series Fi1e :C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf 8
Till Grass 0.30 acres Scaling Yr: 8
Loading Time Series File :C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8
Impervious 0.36 acres Adding Yr: 8
Total Area :._.._ 0.66 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.234 CFS'.at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
� Storing Time Series File:norpre.tsf 8
--Time Series Computed
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
SOUTH BASIN NATURAL DISCHARGE DATA
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : soupass.tsf G
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series File:C:\KC SQDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf 8
Till Grass 0.08 acres Scaling Yr: 8
Loading Time Series File: C:\KC_S6JDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 8
Impervious 0.33 acres Adding Yr: 8
Total Azea .. x_._0.41 acres
Peak Discharge:'" 0.173 CFS`at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series File:soupos.tsf 8
rrrc .
Time Series Computed
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : soupre. tsf
Regional Scale Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type :.Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series
Till Grass 0.10 acres
Loading Time Series
Impervious 0.31 acres
File: C:\KC_SUDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf 8
Scaling Yr: 8
File: C:\KC_SVDM\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8
Adding Yr: 8
Total Arm. ^0, 41 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.168 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
.. -1 Storing Time Series File:soupre.tsf 8
Time Series Computed
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
• •
SOUTH BASIN NATURAL DISCHARGE DATA
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : SC_ NTTPPOS,_tsf
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series Fi1e :C:\KC_SVDM\KC_DATA\STTG60R.rnf 8
Till Grass 0.15 acres Scaling Yr: 8
Loading Time Series File :C:\KC_SADM\KC_DATA\STEI6OR.rnf 8
Impervious 0.92 acres Adding Yr: 8
Total Area-4... ,.k.07 acres
Peak Discharge:: 0„_66 E 'at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series File:SCNTPOS.tsf 8
Time Series Computed
KCRTS Command
CREATE a new Time Series
Production of Runoff Time Series
Project Location : Sea -Tac
Computing Series : scntpre.tsf. C--- -
Regional Scale Factor : 1.00
Data Type : Reduced
Creating Hourly Time Series File
Loading Time Series Fi1e:C:\KC_SVDM\KC_DATA\S1TG60R : rnf 8
Till Grass 0.40 acres Scaling Yr: 8
Loading Time Series Fi1e: C:\KC_SVDM\KC_DATA\STEI60R.rnf 8
Impervious 0.67 acres Adding Yr: 8
Total Area_: 1_, 07 acres
Peak Discharge: 0.481 CFS'at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Storing Time Series File:scntpre.tsf 8
wr ffe
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2084
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
SECTION ill
OFF SITE ANALYSIS
RECEIVED
• 'JUN 0 9 2004
DEVELOPMENT
• •
OFFSITE ANALYSIS
Upstream:
No runoff enters the site from the upstream area, which is the area to the west.
Runoff from the adjacent site is collected in a storm drain system in an access
easement located between the sites. This runoff is collected together with other
uphill runoff in a 36 inch CMP and carried through the site. The sites to the north
and south are collected in their own drainage systems.
On -site:
Having been fully developed in the past, the site runoff is collected in existing
storm drain systems. The site is occupied by a restaurant building in the center,
with parking on the north and south sides. Because the site occupies an east -
west ridge that slopes down to the south and north, runoff is split in those
directions. A storm drain pipe in the easement area on the northern portion of
the west side of the site collects runoff and carries it into the 36 inch storm drain
described above. On the southerly portion of the west side of the site, a
separate storm drain collects runoff from that area and extends a short distance
to the south. At that point, it tums to the east and runs to a catch basin in the
existing parking area that is off of the site to the south east. The civil plans for
the site show these runoff patterns. Runoff in front of the existing building sheet
flows across the sidewalk and into Southcenter Pkwy. It is not known how the
roof downspouts connect to the storm drain system.
Downstream:
All of the runoff enters and large diameter storm drain in Southcenter Pkwy. This
pipe drains to the north to Minkler St., where it turns and heads east in a 54 inch
pipe. The system is illustrated in copies of the City's storm drain maps, enclosed
herein. The developed site will drain into this system, as it does now.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
2.64 Ac.
r't.10
KIYOTU MIKAMI
TAKUMI h11KAMt
371A(
Ti 7/
YANAGAWA NANAKU
TL. 69,
(D
0
J. C. PENN['( CI
t n a G n C
544,
°MINKLER
(yi sf 1„..11.12r
.S2.
' r' ••ILhuir •
c ❑
I":•/
I. •../ /:•:.•f
3
■P
4&
(768)
(167-)
U4101-1 PACI F rC
S 2
(82,6)
1.00 A.
rc. 3 a
(1159)
.J
24'STO5.VO YN
v:aao7
30'E.ASEHJ&VY
o.3 /'t ,S.p "S-r a 0006S
TO.o 5L AB
Nrs.
36'STWB 4/17.407"N
C, omm/ r' 4 lrc.✓
• E -4 a.0aO7
M M. 3
L
41,
4 4
77/.76'
.3S = 24 "'Sou TN
S F o. 0025
• S '2. 4' S- "
-. S =.p.aao .';' ..,. -
, E. ,.s,9ME.f. d /NE
w‘51"
•
=0.0090
C.4' .7.0. #1.4 re//
L MNE
NOTE -
,#I N. 2.3, a'1 ra 8E
.P4 Y /560 rp P.QE -C4S%
ASSG
f
L
JUN -:i—U4 is
1\1lnhr-
,oic it'!/i° _ / —
O /7C,Y FL ob✓ 3� /F'c
.4s ,PEP D
e Pm,Ea
LW-CH/Xis 'x
.PrP ,fAP.BarrOM 0.'
o�rC 9
at sc ^Five"
r--3 0
°c °
m z ca
y �
0 ni
o v d'
• S2C'.1 6CH S p. 00037
S
v. oa L,
S
90 .
S F -A/LAV A'
ccE�rEa i/ 4
P4ro8E _
M./,2
... -
/. E. /3.271
FL L/{.. NP OF „$-i"
oPC -v O'rc. ?, 07°ra1 1
3'/ '4 Oeoe.
= a, aaa.
aE7,4/z A
C.PGIAWN 7 ,*I,4 rW,y
Le-w4/4/4- i 0.0007
O'E/JSE
6S9.3S'
//45'.37 7.5-
a4 "s raB A.'a f 7H •
c- ea.w.v ro Aid YC.V
C-' 4hV. S-
-. 04/007
b�s.
ME,vJ'
6 39 :t 6 d °. S= a Dao64
A SSDC)A T D G/Pd CEPS
1
es-
C, a.M4' ,s0,0
4%44 .• .
= a
•
t
r.
1
i' /PSI w Jv. 70M
0f' O /Ttf/FO 4 /i✓.
A'.- - /PA,P 7'4":46W
S /DE' a.4 o /P. -
SEE %3YOf /Lf r o?i' e
OFF AA* 44 . ..
O,D Al O /TCH
Sw'O. 0026
sEE ,oEr.4/4 4 ";
yr-
SAMMAMISH COMMERCIAL CO., INC. -
scAu
ORwWINC
Ct1ECK o RY .144
• •
SECTION IV
TREATMENT DESIGN
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004'
_commuNITY
utve..opmENT
!!)
:6
1
• -
-at
• •,--- ‘1 410
. , ) ::
-i... -
• A-, 1. t .2 ',-- ../ :-.4 ' ' .1 ' i 5r:
i ..-.
9r, 0 tt:1 k ' '4,..- L v.:7_, 0 tr a. ,4 e:;•-t■ 41: :
i'.
, (.1 ,.. • , r . r i
.1.:" 5 ',1 ....) 'r.. ' .•.. 1,2 ,''': 1 "' V I. .- C‘ •••.' .(' V.) '-: !` , UA- 1 t--
....: f .
tq 0 '''■ 'H-- 0 .:2- 1/3 ( f . [ 1 —7
r..: , 7 t...... ..,... 4,
; *
Iv, e._ r r-,-,. ,A-i-..Pv!---4 • .
TO .t-c.( ' I 4--) 8 Z
kr--,1 5 VQ-^4, C ;" t '4-10
U.) t' C .4---,.‘-*---+." ,-) 9 '.. ',A• ; :4. 4-'10 'fr tAA e.....4... •-) 4',7/9 n ..3 .
...,_.. ..L. • ,
• , _...... I .... 1 i 1
t f
1. ^A:4^. '4...;, ..., e LC' .% -a •,..t.-t--t— e. :1 sz.. 4.^., 'Si. v (.1._ re.._ , , -,
ji ,
(AI .4) 1"t-- C. Cr ,k, •e r V •:-- IA". tt. 6v ts (......,_:.,.:,-. "rk e _-: 4.•_ c.. e.... i; :LW,. 'd .....3 t ...A.:
.....L1 i e. 4 (1. ..... ...+-.
e-p-i-vtro
2,
-14,04-G
L•4- 1Z19
tL
c_c..J.A. IF CI'
ali1 s -r c 4- 4. Lti
a 9. '24/ r 4-L44o ‘c
> t 'A 4 t
9.S ri Li
C-4
.1. • L.) 5 42- .1.1%. 4...res; 47,7-
-4. •
14/ I (Dt:744c
31 '7
or 0
1-...)'A 0.1 L 7-41
5 -4.-clrytc....,ep4x)r$ • . ,
RECEIVED
,JUN 09 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
t_4,1ct(
e)f 1,24
mi
)
I t
f
•
•
5+,OrwtGmP r-
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
Stormceptor Sizing Table
Version 3.0.0
Selected Rainfall Station
State WASHINGTON
Name SEATTLE TACOMA INTL AP
ID # 7473
Elev. (ft) 400 !
Latitude N 47 deg 27 min
Longitude W 122 deg 18 min l
Site Parameters
Total Area (ac)
Imperviousness ' o)
I Impervious Area (ac)
.34
.34
Particle Size Distribution
Diameter (um)
Percent ( %)
Velocity (Ws)
20
20.0
0.0013
60 j
20.0
0.0052
150 i
20.0
0.0351
400 j
20.0
0.2116
2000 i
20.0
0.9416
Note : Sizing Results vary with particle size
distribution. BMP comparisons must use the
same particle size distribution. Please call
(800) 909 -7763 for sizing with other distributions
Stormceptor Sizing Table
Stormceptor Model
% Runoff Treated
% TSS Removal
- STC 450i
STC 900
98.1
89.3 L
99.9
93.6
STC 1200
1
99.9
i
93.8
STC 1800
i
99.9
94.0
STC 2400
100.0
I
95.6
STC 3600
100.0
I
96.0
STC 4800
100.0
97.0
STC 6000
100.0
•.
97.2
STC 7200
100.0
I
97.8
STC 11000
I
100.0
98.5
STC 13000
100.0
98.6
STC 16000
!
100.0
!
98.9
Comments :
RECEIVED
`JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
• •
SECTION VIII
EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
• •
EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTORL DESIGN
No sediment trap or pond is required, as the size of the site and the length of
runoff are too small. The maximum runoff path is from the west side to the east
side, a distance of about 176 feet over a slope of 2.8 %. In accordance with
Section D.4.3 of the Drainage Manual (see next page), perimeter protection is
adequate for this condition. Thus, basic BMP's such as a silt fence, catch basin
filters, construction entrance, and ground cover techniques are adequate.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
.SECTION D.4
•
ESC MEASURES
D.4.3 PERIMETER PROTECTION
ESC Requirement 3: Perimeter protection to filter sediment from sheetwash shall be located downslope
of all disturbed areas and shall be installed prior to upslope grading. Perimeter protection includes the use
of vegetated strips as well as more conventional, constructed measures, such as silt fences. During the wet
season, 50 linear feet of silt fence (and the necessary stakes) per acre of disturbed area must be stockpiled
on site.
Purpose: The purpose of perimeter protection is to reduce the amount of sediment transported beyond the
disturbed areas of the construction site. Perimeter protection is primarily a backup means of sediment
control. Most, if not all, sediment -laden water is to be treated in a sediment trap or pond. The only
circumstances in which perimeter control is to be used as a primary means of sediment removal is when
the catchment is very small (see below).
When to Install: Perimeter protection is to be installed prior to any upslope clearing and grading.
Measures to Use: There are three perimeter protection measures in this section that can be used to satisfy
ESC Requirement 3: silt fence, brush barriers, and vegetated strips. These measures can be used
interchangeably. If surface water is collected by an interceptor dike or swale and routed to a sediment
pond or trap, there is no need for the perimeter protection measures specified in this section.
Criteria for Use as Primary Treatment: At the boundary of a site, perimeter protection may be used as
the sole form of treatment when the flowpath meets the criteria listed below. If these criteria are not met,
perimeter protection shall only be used as a backup to a sediment trap or pond.
Average Slope
1.5H:1 V or less
2H:1V or less
4H:1V or less
6H:1V or less
10H:1 V or less
D.4.3.1 SILT FENCE
Code: SF
Slope Percent Flowpath Length
67% or less
50% or less
25% or less
16.7% or less
10% or less
Symbol:
100 feet
115 feet
150 feet
200 feet
250 feet
Purpose
Use of a silt fence reduces the transport of coarse sediment from a construction site by providing a
temporary physical barrier to sediment and reducing the runoff velocities of overland flow.
Conditions of Use
1. Silt fence may be used downslope of all disturbed areas.
Silt fence is not intended to treat concentrated flows, nor is it intended to treat substantial amounts of
overland flow. Any concentrated flows must be conveyed through the drainage system to a sediment
trap or pond. The only circumstance in which overland flow can be treated solely by a silt fence,
rather than by a sediment trap or pond, is when the area draining to the fence is small (see "Criteria for
Use as Primary Treatment" on page D -18).
Design and Installation Specifications
1. See Figure D.4.E for details.
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMFmr
9/1/98 Erosion and Sediment Control Standards
D -18
q 1 r
SECTION X
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
C"MUNITy
DEVELOPMENT
r
•
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS MANUAL
Only catch basin and Stormceptor maintenance is required. Stormceptors shall
be cleaned by vactor equipment, the same as a catch basin. Clean the sediment
when it reaches a depth of 8 inches by extending the vacuum pipe through the
access lid and to the bottom of the structure. This will likely be required on an
annual basis. See the enclosed guidelines for the maintenance of catch basins.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Y 1 1
APPENDIX .•AIN ENANC° STANDARDS FOR PRIVATalkINTAINED DRAINAGE FACILITIES
NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS
Maintenance
Component
Defect
Conditions When Maintenance is Needed
Results Expected When
Maintenance is performed
General
Trash & Debris
(Includes Sediment)
Trasn or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is
located immediately in front of the catch basin
opening or is blocking capacity of the basin by
more than 10%
Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the
depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest
pipe into or out of the basin.
Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking
more than 1/3 of its height.
Dead animals or vegetation that could generate
odors that could cause complaints or dangerous
gases (e.g., methane).
Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in
volume
Structure Damage to Comer of frame extends more than 3/4 inch past
Frame and/or Top Slab curb face into the street (If applicable).
Cracks in Basin Walls/
Bottom
Sediment/
Misalignment
Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or
cracks wider than 1/4 inch (intent is to make sure
all material is running into basin).
Frame not sitting flush on top slab, i.e., separation
of more than 3/4 inch of the frame from the top
slab.
Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 3 feet
any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin
through cracks, or maintenance person judges that
structure is unsound.
Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot
at the joint of any inlet/ outlet pipe or any evidence
of soil particles entering catch basin through
cracks.
Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated
more than 2 inches out of alignment.
No Trash or debris located
immediately in front of catch
basin opening.
No trash or debris in the catch
basin.
Inlet and outlet pipes free of
trash or debris.
No dead animals or vegetation
present within the catch basin.
No condition present which
would attract or support the
breeding of insects or rodents.
Frame is even with curb.
Top slab is free of holes and
cracks.
Frame is sitting flush on top
slab.
Basin replaced or repaired to
design standards.
No cracks more than 1/4 inch
wide at the joint of inlet/outlet
pipe.
Basin replaced or repaired to
design standards.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 9 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98
A -S
APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE ST•ARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAKE FACILITIES
NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS (CONTINUED)
Maintenance
Component
Defect
Conditions When Maintenance is Needed
Results Expected When
Maintenance is performed
Fire Hazard
Vegetation
Pollution
Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place
Locking Mechanism
Not Working
Cover Difficult to
Remove
Ladder
Metal Grates
(If Applicable)
Ladder Rungs
Unsafe
Trash and Debris
Damaged or
Missing.
Presence of chemicals such as natural gas. oil and
gasoline.
Vegetation growing across and blocking more than
10% of the basin opening.
Vegetation growing in inlet/outlet pipe joints that is
more than six inches tall and less than six inches
apart.
Nonflammable chemicals of more than 1/2 cubic foot
per three feet of basin length.
Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open
catch basin requires maintenance.
Mechanism cannot be opened by on maintenance
person with proper tools. Bolts into frame have Tess
than 1/2 inch of thread.
One maintenance person cannot remove lid after
applying 80 lbs. of lift; intent is keep cover from
sealing off access to maintenance.
Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignment,
rust cracks, or sharp edges.
Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch.
Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of
grate surface. •
Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate.
- NO.6 DEBRIS BARRIERS (E.G., TRASH RACKS)
Maintenance
Components
Defect
No flammable chemicals
present.
No vegetation blocking opening
to basin.
No vegetation or root growth
present.
No pollution present other than
surface film.
Catch basin cover is closed
Mechanism opens with proper
tools.
Cover can be removed by one
maintenance person.
Ladder meets design standards
and allows maintenance person
safe access.
Grate opening meets design
standards.
Grate free of trash and debris.
Grate is in place and meets
design standards.
Condition When Maintenance is Needed
Results Ex • : = - • When
ance is Performed.
General
Metal
Trash and Debris Trash or debris that is plugging more
nos in the barrier.
Damaged/ Missing
Bars.
are bent out of shape mo = • - 3 inches.
of Barrier clear to receive capacity
flow.
Bars in place with no bends more
than 3/4 inch.
Bars are missing or entire barrier missing.
Bars are loose and rust is causing 50% deterioration
to any part of barrier:
design.
Repair or replace b
design standards.
lace according to
RECEIVED
JUN 0 _y 2004
COMMUN;TY
DEVELOPMENT
9/1/98
A -6
1998 Surface Water Design Manual
.:
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E -mail: tukplanO,ci.tukwila.wa.us
•
SEPA
ENVIRON.
REVIEW
(P -SEPA)
APPLICATION
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
- 3 laelX4 L 1L-bI
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant,
indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL
NUMBERS.
Qua
—}fix 242-3G14q IZO
RECENEb
'SIN 08 2004
b 9
ef: e */Section: -UV Township: 'Z t Range: 44.t
(This information may be found on your tax . tatement.)
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary a ry contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: ,�1G 4 C-00,1431-
Address: 1 1 � : ► . • � i J � S e c a l e e ` G L / , 4 - 9 ' -
Phone:
•
Signature. ' —Date:
4•o1-
G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 12/08/99
1
FOR STAFFUSEONLY
Planner: -
File Number: a 44.0 1 Z . , _ —
Application Complete
(Date:
)
Project File Number: ' 1
Application Incomplete
(Date:
)
Other File Nambers: IA 4.6 3 /„
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
- 3 laelX4 L 1L-bI
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant,
indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL
NUMBERS.
Qua
—}fix 242-3G14q IZO
RECENEb
'SIN 08 2004
b 9
ef: e */Section: -UV Township: 'Z t Range: 44.t
(This information may be found on your tax . tatement.)
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping
development standards, and
• is the primary a ry contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: ,�1G 4 C-00,1431-
Address: 1 1 � : ► . • � i J � S e c a l e e ` G L / , 4 - 9 ' -
Phone:
•
Signature. ' —Date:
4•o1-
G:\APPHAN\LANDUSE. APP\SEPAAPP. DOC. 12/08/99
1
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
• 3 MAIL ' rV'W011
2. Name of Applicant:
3. Date checklist prepared:
4. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
Agency Comments
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
M4-)t 1'ltphl 110 W i.J t iii AfT. I /.Vor 'ej
Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
7. List anyenvironmentaL information.you.know, about that has.been •
prepared,.or will'be prepired; directly relatedp thiis proposal:'
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
i■i•d
RECEIVED
JUN 0 8 2004
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
G: 41PPMAIALANDUSE .APP'SEPAAPP.DOC, 11/08199 1
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
tu.10► »n1
7!VPkt �u4-f5
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses +and ,the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to .
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers Qn.this
page.
Tr=xt5no& 4i3oP 5•.. Wia2Vts r' (2/403t
Leims itt e " 020120DS .T-.: '174rt L Tv1 ya/ ft. W'7 °d 1
e/ , >iatt<thl
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a;person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot
number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any
plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
?14cE ?} sss icailogew
T DN . 11 al hS tS 1 614 S.'r•
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
N�
G :UPPHANILANDUSEAPPISEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 4
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, roiling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other:
d /d 11a .1>Avt -KI P6. t-er
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Z 5
-."3,.°4 - stYl V 1 tAlv'q PL
.• e `' .-- `
c. What eneral types o soils are found. on the sitefor example; cla Y, sand , vel
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agriculttuaFsoil 'sa'pecify~theui and
note any prime farmland.
-t 1f Imo. ithi t+xl A u;ov /•ai- hoc i
d. Are there.surface•indications or. history.of unstable_soils in the immediate vicinity?
If so, describe.., ,
tsir
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
' ',vt --D we It 6¢.1600./i
4 ` r9vNriktv►v tsrxracth4211a0 .
G:\ APPHANUANDUSE.APMSEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 5
RECEIVED
JUN 08 2004''
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
g.
Nevi- tAV
About what percent of the site will be covered with impeivibus surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
14911.4tA L askrnkINicW,07 PIV1,8e"06140'ttgn
1).ff"Zofeevi1/2.-rviAna1/4-1
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is
completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
‘40I051/We lblU fit" r 14 l IPL 't ‘50c.4tiSt ""14-,419
iM.14 j161>5- DNd6' C PRi'D.
4
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
140
G MPPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 6
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
')1€ At P 1° trulti oyG
3. Water
a. Surface:
,
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
tea
3. 'Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed -from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 8 2004'
DEVELOP MT
G: V+PPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPMPP.DOC, 12/08/99 7
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose,.and approximate ,quantities, if known..
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
IJQ
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? if so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NO
b. Ground:
1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description,. purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
G :WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APPISEPAAPPDOC. 13/08/99 8
• •
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve:
N.A •
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1. • Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this watei flow? Will this
water flow ?)Will this water :flow,into. other waters? „If•so, describe:. 4
6 1)1► --jam •5+nt,Y6 ' t sue -* •
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally. describe.,:
Nor EA 14Veuli v Nes tW1 (S Spit-txtio
1 u P iwo► •
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
eD :. w Ftbil. .c,1- R'Z1X14;444 u.rnt _.# ),641 was
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 8 2004'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
GAAPPHANS ANDUSEAPPISEPAAPP.DOC, 12108/99 9
•
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle es of vegetation found on the site:
deem.
• • ee• • lder, maple, aspen, other
- - • • fir, cedar, pine, other
,Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,
skunk cabbage, other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
OrneGgrtibrOMY IGD ! P1 1'5 r— .ensr gAvv+o
4 s
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be.on or near the site.
KNeu1
r -^
'
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation•on the site, if any:
G:\ APPHANILANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 11/08/99 10
Agency Comments
• •
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
Hawk, heron, eagle, s , other: 74o1535 4aUtekvs'i L:YleIers
Deer, bear, elk, beaver, o ' er:
Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other.
Mammals
Fish
Other
Agency Comments
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
• ,..
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
S wr't-4lN 1146' PlikeTPO K ..
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ..
NevE _ 1_ - s*) o L 'r t4 .
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
•
RECEIVED
1JUN 0 8 2004'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
G:\ APPHAN 1L .ANDUSEAPASEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 11
•
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If
so, generally describe.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Agency Comments
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill,,or hazardous waste, that could.occur.as a•result of
this proposal? If so, describe.
N4•
•
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
0.1.3 itzttnEau"-M
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
3505-:. - i. -11411ifsl "IM :s.8tv..
G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP*SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 12
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which. may, affect your•project (for •
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
D
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
18 %AA r • l..•■
(AI�741 N4-o
Agency Comments
Goo& 1-64/144
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
4. N#1Z01 GrilAL 1t a t- It 1S .065-7040P4641.
Uf•
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Per IJ Vag- .
GAAPPHAI A34DUSE.APPISEPMPP.DOC.13/08/99 13
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 8 2004'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
•
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
c. Describe any structures on the site.
(91■TV' i5519 :c. tf3S1rik.R-Itstrr..
�•I
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
fir,
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
g. If applicable; what the current shoreline. master .program designation of the site?
F ,.• , ,. • ; 4
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
G: WPPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DGC, 12/08/99 14
Agency Comment
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
►•o h- 2" ' 50 �� LCSr11d -IL c
N 1 t»G4011■25.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
ppki4trzetd St44 PLCqgrA AT. LVIXIl -ws 7.15q AP - U'
�t∎ir
is v
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
R
•
M1 `
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
erF0%4t 1 11 ' Gorti Tarr-
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or lbw- income,housing?
• r As
v, (
1.
a =a ,' `�,
GAAPPHAMLANDUSE.APRSEPAAPP.DOC, 13/08/99
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 8 2004'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
15
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comment
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
•
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what
is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
5 it -Iv .r r , der Pk
b. What views in the' immediate vicinity would •$ekaltered or obstructed ?:
1
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Wl6TaVlir�Il DX.) i�%kt J c WkvL 'b-iiaMil'r tikoX 6�
G:V PPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 17108/99 - 16
• •
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: - Agency Comments
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would t.
mainly occur?
1..14 r -r--144914,1, t frt *Pro LAG ' 1-)1414?"
. 1 ''t=ic L 75
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety ha72rd or interfere with
views?
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your,proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
115 t � r°oci sr is- 44r1 y=1 ,X`flie
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
144. cis IE:76...-T1 #46.
G :WPPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP -DOC, 11/08/99 17
RECEIVED
JUN 0 8 2004'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comment
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
Nth
1 ..
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
torkrE
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
Norte .►1/4)4uL)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific,
or cultural importance known to ,be, on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
IQ OP&
GAAPPHAN \LANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/08/99 18
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
14. Transportation
• a.. ` Identify public streets and highways, serving the, site, and': describe proposed,access ,
to the existing street system. Show-on site plans; if any. ` `' ` •
aft, 4-i Ste' hJ- T .K.(,('A.i
t —
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what,is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
t9N l4vst1J
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
I cam- itt'Ate 42 U.p .
YOGI `31>iketES -f- V-xt517 '��aST0vR4-4'
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing '"
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
Igo
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity,of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
1�r0
RE GENE
JUN 0 8 2004'
e.)r.,;+1UNITY
DEVELOPMENT
GAAPPHANV .ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DOC, 12/03/99 19
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Commeni
f. How many vehicular trips . per day would be generated by the . completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
45 Act-t)14514 1A4,4,1449144Qu3utM nakt n
►ti4,4 "v d i1- - tRocU5a9 t'P,LWP
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: .
Ca •
a•
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
1Jo
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
toav-
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities c
other:
tly available a ite:
ater, fuse servi ,
r, septic
G:\ APPHAN\LANDUSE.APPiSEPAAPP.DOC, 12/09/99
20
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
t� Ct t-rhir Act- ,1/4.941/ 4%
`- Srt . L,Wrc- - Van.V ei IAQ Atj kictiV
1-0 1E esi-ni(legiortret- a
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
-
7 A of
(NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND
ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PAGES).
RECEIVED
'JUN 0 8 2004'
CQMMUNITy
DEVELOPMENT
G: \APPHAMLANDUSE.APPISEPAAPP.DOC, 12/09/99 21
• •
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SKEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction with the list of elements of the environment.
When ariswe'ring these questions, be aware 'of the extent the proposal, or
the types of activities 'likely. to result from theproposal, would affect the`'
item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not
implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions
to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or ha721-dous substances; or
production of noise?
•
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine
life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life
are:
G:\ APPHANU.ANDUSE.APP\SEPAAPP.DDC, 12/09/99 22
�tr4 ru.uJ
1 Inch =20ft.
����4 -sue•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE S.W. 1/4 OF SECTION
KING IOCOUNTYT WASHINGTON,
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M.,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26;
THENCE N 87'45'57" W ALONG THE SECTION LINE A DISTANCE
OF 481.05 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER
PARKWAY; THENCE N 11'59'33" W ALONG SAID MARGIN A
DISTANCE OF B Y DEED 3RECORDED WITH A TRACT
CONVEYED UNDER RECORDING NO.
8912290859 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING N 11'59'33" W ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN OF
SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY A DISTANCE OF 105.15 FEET TO A
POINT OF A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET THROUGHT A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 04'53'59 " AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.78 FEET TO THE
,
SOUTH BOUNDARY AS RESERVEDNIN DRIVEWAY DEED RECORDED EASEMENT
(EASEMENT NO.
RECORDING NO. 8912290859); THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST
CE
MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER S AR 5 33" E A. DISTANCE OF 26 N67
OF 182.00 FEET; THENCE
FEET; THENCE S 8825'36" E A DISTANCE OF 115.17 FEET;
THENCE N 11%%59'33" W A DISTANCE OF 91.74 FEET; THENCE
MARGIN , OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY WEST
PARKWAY AND THE POINT OF
M ARGIN
M
BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH THAT NSHOIP�23 NORTH, RANGE OF W.M. 1/4
OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
OF SECTION 26; THENCE N 87'45'57" W ALONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 481.03
FEET, TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY AS
63438 ESTABLISHED' , 6343865, 63403867Y AND RECORDING THENCE N 1'1'
6343863, 6
59'33" W ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 830.58
FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN ON A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET, AN
ARCE DISTANCE OF 124.78, THROUGHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
0712'41" 41 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 86'
40'03" W A DISTANCE OF 274.13 FEET; THENCE N 01'08'35" E
A DISTANCE OF 30.66 FEET; THENCE S 88'51'25" E A
DISTANCE OF 272.38 FEET TO SAID WEST MARGIN OF
SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
WEST MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF
WHICH BEARS N 85'45'26" E, HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37
FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'32'18" TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
RECEIVED
JUN 0 8 2004
L:OMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
SURVEY NOTES
Uity of l ukwz SA Screening Checklist
City of Tukwila
Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist
Date: 6 /s 10
Applicant Name: Bad Deck/
Street Address: // 7 E Loa, ; s 57 IF23n
City, State, Zip: Se Sg i� /e w %ftla7
Telephone: 7 --0 G f6 f
Directions
This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to
result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or
"No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on
Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next
question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer
to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you
have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if
"take" is indicated.
January 25, 2001 ii
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA
98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665
E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING
OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S)
State of Washington
County of King
City of Tukwila
I (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days
following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness.
I certify that on the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section
18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at
so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary
vehicular access to the property for application file number
I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately
dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within
fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter.
Applicant or Project Manager's Signature
On this day personally appeared before me to me
known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that
he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned
therein.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commission expires
SEPA_APP -VU 1/23/03
•
•
'tcEIVEb
JUN 0 81004
bk-v� MENr
Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project
including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and
ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes
answer.
1 -0
Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling,
clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the
existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06,
Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0
Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) •
2 -0
Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be
removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter
18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -0
CYO Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4)
3 -0
Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water
mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high
water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and
ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly
mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter
18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response.
NO - ontinue to Question 4 -0
YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5)
4 -0
Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous
substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank.
Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance,
product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria
of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter
18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site
d ; construction. Please circle appropriate response.
NO -,) ontinue to Question 5 -0
YES - Continue to Question 5 -0
5 -0
Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples
of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new
well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged
construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer
lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to
the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report
if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate
r _:!Ise.
NO; ontinue to Question 6 -0
YES - Continue to Question 6 -0
Part A (continued)
•
Llty of 1 ukunla i Screening Checklist
6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the
regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of
transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs,
groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect
appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18-
13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass.
Please circle appropriate response.
NO — Checklist Complete
Checklist Complete
Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
1 -1
Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This
includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but
will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high
water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response.
Continue to Question 1 -2
YES - Continue to Question 1 -2
1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off
site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish
rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in
increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your
project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during
construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your
project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the
preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in
erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question.
Please circle appropriate response.
Continue to Question 1 -3
YES - Continue to Question 1 -3
1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces
include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the
manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a
hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased
rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC
Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to,
rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect
the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle
• City of '1 ukunlSA Screening Checklist
1:1ECEIVVD
SUN 0 8 2004
zt,� C Mle T
appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
Continue to Question 1-4
1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be
infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a
stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by
allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the
ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include
the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater,
answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
CY-E0Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
2 -1
Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO ! Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 2 -2
2 -2
Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark
of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC
18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a
potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet.
Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 2 -3
YES - Continue to Question 2 -3
2 -3
Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary
high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of
this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in
the fall. Please circle appropriate response.
NO ) Continue to Question 2 -4
YES - Continue to Question 2 -4
2 -4
Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1)
• S - Continue to Question 2 -5
2 -5
Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
City of '1 ukwil A Screening Lhecklzst
Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)
Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high
water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to,
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
3 -1
Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the
Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the
area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the
stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes
both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response.
- ' ontinue to Question 3 -2
YES - Continue to Question 3 -2
3 -2
Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the
Green /Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, 'connected to the river means"
flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that
allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels,
remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area
that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This
includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses
or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a
flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO o ►ontinue to Question 3 -3
_
YES - Continue to Question 3 -3
3 -3
Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could
be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black
Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified
structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of
sal onids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response.
NO ontinue to Question 3 -4
YES - Continue to Question 3 -4
3 -4
Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the
cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right
bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response.
NO • ntinue to Question 3 -5
S - Continue to Question 3 -5
3 -5
Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a
•
catty of l ukwilifi Screening Chec
%�F
VI 08 0
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysl�� ?004 '
includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged met j'
and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal
from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
ontinue to Question 3 -6
YES - Continue to Question 3 -6
3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to
another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat
conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside
seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection
to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under
natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater
support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please
circle appropriate response.
NO
ntinue to Question 3 -7
YES - Continue to Question 3 -7
3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a
watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of
artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature
created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife,
• ularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response.
ontinue to Question 3 -8
YES - Continue to Question 3 -8
3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization
includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete
st r - . res, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response.
ontinue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2)
S - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2)
•
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. An electronic version of this
form is also available from the Department of Community Development.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of Applicant:
3. Date checklist prepared:
4. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
Agency Comments
toag Ism
4
MKS SAVORY 4'4R
LLOS91 wSPERREM oM
OS lmlu � ero6xe
111 1 I 1 j TTY i1= -lt-ri"1
E5 R W.2 .NUM
AMO At•PE4 REC •
R0. stew. 6161890. .
i-R 1
4S 7t. ROE WATER 129751`,r
AISI PER REC. N0. 89122908..0 osonom
0771 nM 1.
WA E7
rV'
n3. ___________� - -i
,ns
___ _.-___
10 FT
N1N0 EN5N10 TAE,-'
N LEAD MTNr 0.1 FT
Of CASCIITED COWER �d r
PO OMR £T9
PEP RES. NO. 010727�710221;y7
z1Ld
Ora1F.:r, M.
15 .0 00
1062740
O 5TREE T 'REF \ 4£LETAMM
en CAS METER
Ow WATER vE15R
• 117207'C RO11A90
• CC0
e ARE 49,457
• SPOT El rvancw
• MANX F(NF0
wr UTLLETP PAUL?
,e. 005718 4479.3.E
50900 04.:900
•n SR1RM 049101
WATER NANNERE
• -A ICNT 51400,0
# 0247 PC57
SIIARM EATEN 04590
ry
POLE
r. WATER VARY
rm STORM 0007037
• SEE SHEET 1 FOR PARCEL D EASEMENT DETAIL
ALA TAB 11 ACM 'LAMB MESURVEY
MAMAS' N'ESTAUR4IFT PARCEL
LOCATED IN THE S.E. 1/4, S.W. 1/4, SECTION 26, T. 23 N., R 4 E., W.M.
CHADWICK & WINTERS
LAND SURVEYING, INC.
350 LR9 AVE. 0N.. 5£.40700 NA, 09107
PHONE (200) 207 -0490
FAX: 1506) 207 -0997
E -A91I0 CNSHRVSTQ.NS'A'.COM
P901ECT 0: 01 -2007
CRAN72C: O1- 2608.052
CLIENT. :ROT An0e 7,,2:7
SHEET 2 OF 2
•
S 8851'25" E
27 38'
IStN
—
COMMON ACCESS DRIVE. ESMT.
Lso3Bs
WALL PACK LIGHT
0283.
1
1
1
1
‘WALL PACK UGNT
1
1
1
1
1
\ WALL PACK LIG
I 5
\
•1'
1 0
7-1
EXIST. PKG. -
NOT A PART
OF PROPERTY
BUT USEABLE
)J EXIST. F.H.
I 0
VICINITY MAP
SC-3 RETAIL BUILDING
• SITE AREA: 47,694sf
BLDG. AREA: 20,039sf
ON SITE PARKING: 80
• LANDSCAPE AREA: 5,200sf
BUFF TONE CONCRETE I
WALK wn'H TOOLED
JOINTS
HT 0'
svAs
JOANN FABRIC
1
1
1
1
1
■
WALL PACK UGNT
BORDERS BOOKSTORE
IXIST. PKG. -
NOT A PART
OF PROPERTY
BUT USEABLE
SITE PLAN
23 .10' 3
1" 20'—O"
17401 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
20'
NOTES:
1. PYLON SIGN NOT TO EXCEED 75sf PER SIDE.
2. HEIGHT OF PYLON SIGN NOT TO EXCEED 35' A.F.G.
3. SITE LIGHTING
6 WALL PACKS @ 175W EACH = 1,050W
3 POLE MOUNTED SHOE BOX LIGHTS @ 400W EACH = 1200W
TOTAL WATTS = 2,250W
4. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WATTS @ 0.20W/SF = 5,476W
PYLON SIGN
\ LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:
1 PARKING LS REQUIRED IN FRONT/SIDE
\ PARKING LS SHOWN = 2,213sf
(NOT INCLUDING
\ PARKING LS REQUIRED IN REAR = 20
\ PARKING LS SHOWN = 565s.f.
1
■
■
RECEIVED
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
= 60 STALLS x
15' FRONT YD.
STALLS x 10s.f.
15s.f. = 900s.f.
LANDSCAPING)
= 200s.f.
0
0
83
0
c
0
C
g
-C
cfl
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
—J
w
1—
(/)
LANCE MUELLER S ASSOCIATES
0
sheet
A1.0
F
\6 -33
L O O R P L A N
12'11,0. z 5' -O w
PRECAST CONC. '
PILASTER FACE - TYP.
ON EAST SIDE OF BLDG.
•
16' 8 0' 8' 16'
1• = 16' -E"
M
N
wMINNINPUNIMIN•w
A` INIMMI_ V_W II
w® mosammREL9ER➢31�' i�w
E A S T
1
w s�Af ��+y�
1 f. IRaA ®aal8.7i 01 l 1∎ 1• 1
M DU mm Magmmtralla-rtoMbilaisi
PRECAST PARAPET TYP.,
PER 1 /A2,0
MOM= SIGNAGE
wow
V 1111111.1111.111114
E L E V A T I O N
16'
16'
i■ !!
SIGNAGE •
- - l.
MN
4_ •
o�me�aosl�aei0m� sao�a�-
IiV Sf'3l6'.YM 6WYiJ- t.W.iAM1] q.1�AA XSi'i -
F"UNE-
86'-11
NORTH ELEVATION
16' 8' 0' 8' 16'
1' = 16' -0'
MECH.
wREMINNIr111111Nw
magummmimmmm
SOUTH ELEVATION
FORMED CORNICE, PAINT
CONCRETE PANELS W/ REVEALS. PAINT
METAL CANOPY W/ 11E RODS, PAINT
CLEAR INSULATED CLASS IN ANODIZES ALUMINUM FRAMES
CERAMIC' 111E PATTERN
16' 8' 0' 8' 16'
1 = 16' -0•
.o
PRECAST CONC. PARAPET
OR SHAPED FOAM PLASTIC
MTL. COPING
1 16 -0•
WALL SCONCE UGHT
FIXTURE - TYP.
N
11"
PRECAST CONC. PANEL
OPARAPET DETAIL
SCALE: 1 -1/2" = 1' -0"
4
Q
4
a
8
WEST ELEVA.T
0 N
WALL PACK JGHT FIXTURE
METAL CANOPY, PAINT
CONCRETE PANEL, PAINT
METAL DOORS; PAINT
FIN. GRADE
RECYCLE & DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE
16' 8' 0' 8' 16'
1' = 16' -0`
O§
h o
n
CI
revision
. ,..c
0
04 -030
job no. I
PTX
drawn
checked __ J
4 -7 -04
date
2. 4
Nve
\
•
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
17401 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
TUKWILA, • WASHINGTON
1 FLOOR PLAN & ELEVATIONS
.ANCE MUELLER 6 ASSOCIATES
sheet
A2.0
LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
Willie Baxter
Date
Jul 30 2004
Scale
1' = 25'
Drawing No.
Symbol
Label
Ely
Catalog Mete
0..p40324i
Land
F4
LLAMM
LLF
W.02
0
•
A3
7
Vision** PST-
400M4TS4IlF0-
SEG
IT SO X r DEEP 4304
I OUNf UNIT WITH
SPECULAR
SEGMENTED MAD)
LAMP NAM
1762002 PS250NIR50
P9/320P8V031110400PS
141 SQUARE CLEAR
TEMPERED GLASS
LENS
11)400 WATT METAL
11AUJDE LAMP VENNiiE
RMS400
PST 1752/3411-
-
SEGA *
40000
0.72
454
❑
•
M
2
Vmanall.. PST-
4004T4 -NLFG-
SEG
lr500rOEEP ARM
MOUNT UNIT WITH
SPECULAR
SEGMENTED MAIN
LAMP WITH
17520IO00PSO502040S0
P$72CPSNOWO1/400P9
14- SQUARE CLEAR
(1)400 WATT METAL
HALIDE Loup yam/ HE
01421400
PST 175204T4-
-MFG-
SEOJes
l
40000
0.72
454
TFNPERED MASS
LENS
A
8
1WH17521 TBLPI
GLASS REFRACTOR
WALL -pm
175 WATT METAL
HALIDE
241211011ES
14000
0.72
215
STATISTICS
Cols 2022 01
NOTES
Avg 80.0
+ 1.14
1. 20 Pd. /Mooney Hipp
2. Ctla4494at 0140,4 L.W
3. 0010 tat. FAera A020.4 • hW
V50.0 W70 M HON
81.28841 Avplwl
7.54 0.0Is NIA NIA
\
53 52 52 52 0
09 53 53 0A
Oa W 52 94
E4 50 to 52
9 07
0.7 0.0
Oi to 1,1
to 1A 11
07 t0 1.1
t9 1.,
53 53 53 53 is
to W tu to 07 11
W 04 Os 10 to 00/')
67 to - 09 l9 12
la 27 10 to V
1.7 u 7;' 0a
NA 52 30 to 17
0.7 1,1 1A
04 1.1 12 - to
0.0 1.9 t2..
53 1
0}M
to 5
29.01
FFE
A 1s Rs to
51 is 1.0 Rat IA 1
1.4 1A 12
A 21 U 5A 52 So D9
1s to 00 1 IA DA
0 1.5 TA RA 1A
. DA 11 IA 0.7
OA
09 lA 1,1
W O9 1,1
to 10 1.1
0o 67
9 67
5
W 0a 0.4 04 M DA D
52 52 6a 02 64 Oa 04 04
53 to 53 D9
Da 01 01 t.
DA to
to 52 0.
0.1 01 0.0
53 to to
e9
99 0
03 to
97 01 Do DO t0 to
• - 5.7 0.1. to . to
5.4 07 51 53
to DI 9 61 OS .. t9
Southwest MOW
NNamN
This 4955.3 b offered In I4ptn•• b 0707eer49 891 87888785.40094 by Ile 022101177100149199l00•Acn •ubfer78.
end 4241W1 ! In the 0.40 arm,. Ampnd he.M Opt. Puoluo erM hoho4 Nr• loh74272.4700 h 2422
luau. Mn • 'o 00 Wow. 24007•311. TM• Irye01g00I4 our best MNpnn9on al M 0wY•0 228019 0449
Woo 8940n00bn• mry 087.06 W 807,4•0 b be • palm.. al Ileum pefmlon a IY 4DWh49 oMW0d gffibo._
Pan View
Designer
Willie Baxter
Date
Jul 30 2004
Scale
1' = 25'
Drawing No.
W117-04-r
1 of 1
EMARES 5/14/0c.I
•
20 0 10 20
40
l 1005 - 20 f4
��ase.,..gent 55'
i0 Son;w`Y
R, 'L'.65
SW 60 12"
IE 1'.60 12' .1
IE 'E 4.50 12'
1
It Nei 20.37 36"
:E 2E 203' pfi"
IE SW .57 j110"
1
1
C6
CE
IE
BP.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF 714E S.W. 1/4 Cr SECTION 26. TOWNSHIP 23
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN 'KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON.
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
■
S 88'51'22" E
11 5 8640'03" W
1 '2
■
272.38'
274.13'
COMMON ACCESS DRIVE
1CUI.0-10 �m.���.:.-
61 •
Nw '0.11 3,'
i :0 01 51 'fi - - - - - ,r - Drairo98 Iditi nl /,
5:
9 5-----*- 35' il7.F er A1'ta 7703220819- 7 t
5
SW1/4, SEC 26, TWP 23N, RGE 4E
)
ICB T'At 1
7GE Pisa
w 21
81 CP /3' BTM 9.38 38
1 True Point
1' I of o H 9eyinn ;nq
w g10
i gl�
1. OPENING IN
CURB (TRENCH
OVERFLOW)
CH 1
CB T.tl
GE 23.03 w
E 21.78 8
M 1
8' 8.53
Ce / 19 111
• E 567
IE N 15.27 48'
IE 5 10 37 48"
w 1719 36'
0a 19.87 6`
570 16.17
,'OVERFLOW ROUTE
74. EVES
/24 CXST) ' CALC
36•
99 18
25.38\20
123328
.99 1
1 1
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26;
THENCE N 8r455r W ALONG THE SECTION LINE A-DISTANCE
OF 481.05 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER
PARKWAY; THENCE N 11.59•3r W ALONG SAID MARGIN A
DISTANCE OF 725.43 FEET TO A BOUNDARY MTH A TRACT
CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0.
8912290859 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE
CONTINUING N 1159.33' W ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN OF
SOUTNCENTER PARKWAY A DISTANCE OF 105.15 FEET TO A
POINT OF A CURVE; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT
HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET THROUGHT A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 0433•59'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.78 FEET TO ME
SOUTH BOUNDARY OF A COMMON DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
(EASEMENT NO. 1 AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING N0. 8912290859) THENCE LEAVING SND *EST
MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. $ 85•2'11' W A 015TANCE
OF 182.00 FEET; THENCE S 11'59•33' E A DISTANCE OF 261.87
FEET; THENCE 5 8875'38' E A DISTANCE OF 115.17 FEET;
THENCE N 117x59'33' W A DISTANCE OF 91.74 FEET; THENCE
5 8875'38' E A DISTANCE OF 66.85 FEET TO INC *EST
MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY AND INC POINT OF
BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW I/4
OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.Y. IN
KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SE CORNER OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4
OF SECTION 26; THENCE N 8r45'5r W ALONG INC SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 A DISTANCE OF 481.03
FEET, TO THE WEST MARGIN OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY AS
ESTABUSHED IN KING COUNTY RECORDING NO.'S 6343862.
6343863. 6343865 8343887 AND 6343868 THENCE N 11'
59'33' W ALONG SAID *EST MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 830.58
FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN ON A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT. HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37 FEET, AN
NICE DISTANCE OF 124.78. THROUCHT A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
0712•41' TO THE TRUE PANT OF BEGINNING; THENCE 5 86'
40'03" W A DISTANCE CF 274.13 FEET; THENCE N 0198'35' E
A DISTANCE OF 3088 FEET; THENCE S 885125- E A
DISTANCE OF 272.38 FEET TO SAID WEST MARGIN OF
SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
*EST MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, INC CENTER OF
WINCH BEARS N 85'45'26• E. HAVING A RADIUS OF 991.37
FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00'32'18' TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
SURVEY NOTES
SURVEY BY EMERALD LAND SURVEYING
CONTOUR INTERVAL - 2 FOOT
VERTICAL DATUM - NAVD 88
BENCH MARK; 'Top SE Bdl of Base of Light Stondo,d
ROS 22 -140, Eler. 24.02.
IT OF
GRADING
oI
■
6615E n us
Pc, E.heit, Cs
A1N 95072210702
36'
1
True Feint of
ee9;n inq
Point A
I\CO Twos 1
GE 33.49
IE `N 22.19 12'
25.09 12"
TM 23.477
-- T
\-TOE OF NEW CURB
SHALL MATCH EX5T
GRADE
1
■
1
vo,‘ '000i\o"
tk\i'
(sp
1
■
I ,
t
Y!- !615tH
Lf f 16N l
�� 1- 't ST
Y
1290 S,
_ S 11.'17 pl 1
ST :el yr
TS'4 ST
I
170TH 5T G ^ " �
T .
',out 1717
f }'9IX $1 .9`.
`• itm 1 115
, lit
tOrd
CURB 111TH 1'
7'4 OPENINGS,
"'F;; 10' 0.C.
es
VICINITY MAP
NTS
ROCK TRENCH,,,
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:
FLLL:_20_CY
CUT: 3058 CY
OUANTTIES ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR IS REWIRED
TO PERFORM ALL WORK NECESSARY TO BRING 517E TO
GRADES AS 510WN ON THIS PLAN AND TO MEET FIELD
CONDITIONS
SITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
310 208T11 ST 56
BOTHELL, WA 98012
(425)481-9687
(425)4857199 (FAX)
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
DATE: 6/2/04
SCALE: 1 " =20'
17491 SOUTHCENTER ?4W`'
GRADING PLAN
DECKER DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION, INC
117E LOUISA ST, #230
`SEATTLE. WA 95102 PHONE:206 -945 -4354
1 of 4
509855 5/14,(71
10 20
AO
1 Inch - 20 M1
cew
i0 San. r
48" SSM6
Run 2/.`5
15 Sae 14 6013
16 5 14.E0 12"
12 NE 14.55 12.
Eo ,�,en1
\ b
660143 8�'
S 88'51'25" E
S .6'40'03" W
272.39'
274.13'
SILT FENCE.
CLEARING,LT IT % % - -
`tae 2 -54' `fin:
E 2661
, - - -� -� =e
/ _ 9 C�cD- II•I�P4 2
- Tp -G uinaa �c1n
8 T4 Id.01 � S16
1 � &� - pc_,FN 77o3220a19_ _
SW' /4, SEC 26, TWP 23N, RGE 4E
85 CP
1
1
CB Type 1
GE 22 32
IE W 21.54 8.
BM 16._8
-2ne True 8o ln
1 Be4'nning
o
A
I �I�
GI •I■
PLACE CB
FILTER
IE 511 20.37\26'
2 SE 20.37 a6"
E SW "1.5. 0'
P
36'
CS
C 23.03
IE W 21.78 8"
8TM 10.53
CB . 5012 Ua
CE 25.67
12 c' 18.27 48'
IE _ 15 37 48"
15 'N 17.17 36'
IE 514 19.81 6'
911% 16.17
CB T
C n9.1
IE . 25.36 2• 0'
IE 5 25.28
602423.95 \
GPE4EE T
•
an
SILT FENCE ON
P/L. (CLEARING
LIMIT)
Ntr 28.89 \
�/1- -No 6419 Easement as
I E'e r "Na:bits O & %
1 I 0FN 9507210282
• tiw
28Twe I
GE 29.86
15 NW 26.86 12"
10 _E 26 3E 12"
BTM 25.35
1
36' 1
I
1
1
TrLs Pow/ of
Paint
9
4
9
T FENCE ON P/L
(CLEARING LIMIT)
1
GE 26.81
E $ 23.51 15"
W 23.91 1.
O Y
BTU 1
• \
• o' -PIACE CB
11
I
PLACE
FILTER
1 I -
V _ _ 1
'1 I
1 \ 1
\ I I
102 30330:91
'E NW 2519 12'
C c 25 09 12"
TM 23.49
FILTER
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
■
■
■
1
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
I. ARRANGE AND ATTEND PRECCNSTRUCRON MEETING WITH CITY CF
TUKWILA INSPECTOR.
2 FLAG CLEARING LOAFS.
3 INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. (NOT USED)
4 CLEAN OUT CB'S & INSTALL TESC 29 FILTERS AND CLEAR AREA OF PROPOSED WORK.
5 INSTALL 5501068T CONTROL SYSTEMS, AS SPECIFIED.
6 PERFORM GRADING, INSTALL 'UTILITIES, & INSTALL PAVEMENT.
7 SEED OR SURFACE DI5TUR350 AREAS.
9. CLEAN OUT STORM DRAW SYSTEM.
9. REMOVE SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AFTER
SITE HAS BEEN STABIUZED AND THE 0TY'5 INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED
1HE REMOVAL.
SITE DEVO.OPMENT SERVICES
310 208TH SF SE
BOTHEU. WA 98012
(925) 4819667
(925)185 -7199 (FAIQ
8/4/04 REVISED PER NEW SITE PLAN
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
17401 50U TNCEN TER PKWY
DATE: 6/2/04
•ES: 020
SC ALE: 1'.70
IAN: J4
TESC PLAN
DECKER DEVELO °KENT & CONSTRUCT:ON. INC
117 E LOJISA ST, #230
s.SEATTLE. WA 98102 PHONE: 206- 545- 4964
2of4
20 0 10 20
40
1 inch - 20 R
48" 05411 ,
Rim 2r.`5
IE Sw 1 .63 12"
16 5 14.60 12-
16 NE 1400 12'
Dgi
S 88.51'25" E
S 86` +0'03" W
272.35'
SW1/4, SEC 26, TWP 23N, RGE 4E
I I Ca Type 1 /G2 •27.98
IE w 21 54 B"
41 E,m 11 .� BTM 18.38
47E.,�
274.13' 11' 1 anE hoe Pe■nl
18e9innAg
s0
G41p.21114•/
GE 29.17 ,
30 NV( 0..37136-
1E Sr 20.37 156'
If SW 121.57 0'
� v
- 2-84) COMMON ACC
ti 3 CHANNEL' EOU D UD) L 36')
ii�mt�uwi ll�l�il:
22Lr 3811DPES ltt��[v._' " =•- r= :'�v • -
O I %9% �_ ®�
TE-23,88
IE421.91(6')
lEpiO 25(67)
/1(TVPE 2 -541
TE.25.6(SO JD UD)
IE.16.20(ALL)
36
roK
IE- 23.22(000)
t 82.00' ��.
RELOCATED
1 1
a1 rr� 11
IE 5 a
25
IC 5 23.58
n+123.98
CONN NEw BLDG 1
SEINER TO EXST
SIDE SEVER. VERIFY
SIZE AND CONDITION
M CITY$ INSPECTOR
2T
103LF 36
w 20.11 2.6 O 1.42%
i0' Lr_na9e E44emect
F •- 20.01 36'
10 5NraMH?
36'
STORNCEPTOR/1
118 20.16(ISOUD UD)
E- 20.04SOUT)
1615 8 CPEP
O 0.5%
E W 21.70 8
SITU .1996
,
/GE 25.67
10 N 16.27 48-
• 10 5 16.37 48"
I0 W 17.1736'
IE SW 19.476"
Bite 16.17
'Id NEW 36'1E.EXST E
1. OPENINGS
IN CURB,
10' 0.C.
170 18895.4.102-5 W) 559'
IE.20.11(38911M)
1E.20.01(38eN) L
(CONN ALL OTHER OPERTATN6
SD's SERVED BY THS CB)
LOC EXST wN
CT. METER eeTH DDC
SPOUT.
CONN T
EXST W
8' PERF PVC IN
0004 TRENCH,
SLOPE VARIES
SEE SECTION A
*3i'79 45
FIRE SPRINKLER I
MAIN. 512E TO
BE DETERMINED
v
NEW BUILDING
TO FIRE SPRINKLER
MAN IN BLDG
CO
BEGIN 6' PVC
1E.27.7
-NO /
2 -1I4 ECSemenl a
Per 0437,ne D S E
AFN 9007210282
A
'pe 1
4E 29.8E
OW 26 86 12"
< 2646 12'
2536
BePERF PVC ROOF
DRAIN 0 0.5%
"1,60 Point int or
Paint A
2..81
S 2.51 19'
'4 3.01 12•
2'.31
Line 9
A�N 3'07
Ekr
9 Tyco 1
GE 30.49
16 env 2519 12'
1 E 2509 32-
no 23.49
- - .4
■
zc
SD LOCATION ESTIMATED.
VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTR
& NOTIFY INSPECTOR IF
NOT AS SHOWN
■
•
STC 45Oi Precast Concrete Sturmceptor•
(450 US Gallon Capacity)
1. The Use a Rwrmle Connection Is Rex/emended re The Ildel and Outlet Where Applicable.
2. The Ow Shadd be Pos8ioned Oter The heel Drop Pipe and The Vent Pipe. .
3, TN Sbmloept01 System is protected by one w mae d the teeadn9 U.S. Patsies: 64985148;
45498330, t6725260, 65763115,5849181.
STORMCEPTOR 450i
NT5
EXPIRES 5 /14/Oi-t
SITE OEVELOWENT SERVICES
310 208TH ST SE
e0THELL, WA 98012
(425)481%87
(425)485 -7199 (FAX)
8/4/04 REVISED PER NEW 5136 PLAN
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
17401 SOUTHCENTER PKWY
DATE: 6/2/04
DES 000
SCALE:
00N: JK
DRAINAGE PLAN
DECKER DEVELO ?MENT & CCNSTRUCTION, INC
117 E LOJISA ST, 423C
`SEATTLE. WA 98162 P)-0NE:206- 545 -4964
3 of 4
J
1 EXPIRES 5/14/03
Loatlons shown for existing Whin ere aPprorimab.
Prior to starting conatrumon, contact
ONC •CALL (Z400-424-11U88) for utility locations.
SaffESIO3
1. Project Manager
2. Dillon engineer
3. Owner:
4. Omer:
BRAD DECKER
DIiP_R'A �EGI RTY
UCtlp4
1�N
Notify the Wiese ltla inspector at 206433 -0179 it lust 40 hours before slitting
project eta wort.
2. Request • Public Wail utility In1patlwr K but 24 hours In advance
by gaging 206.433.01.79.
3. The Contractor •auma era nesporuldnty for worker ufety, and damage to
structural' and Improvements resulting from conabtrmon operations.
4. The Contractor then have the permtt(a) and conditions, the approved plans,
and • current copy of Qty of TukvAa tnnes:ructue Design and CenStruetlon
Rename available K the job ail.
5. All work shag conform to these approved drawings. My changes from the
approved plans requtro pre- approves from the owner, the enelneer, and the
Qty of Tukwfa.
6. All methods and mKet4e11 shall meat City of Tukwila for esfuceure Design and
ConsoveCen Standards, unless other ea approved by the Pubfe Web
Director.
7. Contractor shall malntatn • current eat of record drawings on -alb.
8. Contractor shall provide record arswings prior to project final approval.
9. Contractor doll provide traffic control and street metntenence plan for Public
Works approval before Imp9mentetion.
10. All surveying for pubtk fedlMu dab be done under the dire:ta n of
Washkhpton licensed land surveyor. Vertical datum shell be NAVO 1988.
Horizontal datum shag be HAD 83/91. Por projects( within ■ flood control Zola,
the Pemilt shag provide conve don ale ethane to NGVD 1929.
11. The Contractor shag replace, or reloats ell dons damaged or removed due to
construction.
1. The erosion prevention and sediment control (!SC) measures on the approved
plans are minimum rsqutnments.
2. establish the Bearing Emil and •
Mesa on antrana.
3. Barbra 1.0 orounddbbrrhanr. osurs: a0 downstream aroalan Prevention and •
sediment control measures MSC) must be constructed and In operation. --Install
and maintain a0 ESC measures sca rdinp to the ESC plan.
'4. ESC measures, Inducting ail perimeter controls, (tail remain M place until final
site construction b Completed and permanant atabllSafon is established.
5, from May 1 through September 30, provide temporary and permanent mvar
measures to prated dbbarbed arise that will remain unworksd tor seven days •
Or more.
6. From October 1 Wrougb April 30, provide bmporary and permanent Cover
measures to protect disturbed ante that will remain unsorted for two Merl or
more. In eddition to cower measures, the Contractor dap:
▪ Protect dtodo dies and steep at as, fill sham M unwonted for min Man
U hours.
• Stodlplle, on site, enough aver materials to cover all disturbed areas.-
7. By October a, mead as arts the will remain unwonted during the eat season
(October 1 dvough April 30). Mulch all seeded areas.
)E II
1. All Mandl aavetlon operations shell mad or eased all spoilable shoring Iawe
for trenches over Heat deep. M1 trench safety systems shelf meet WEDNA
requirements.
2. Power, able, Mar optics, and telephone fine shag be Ina trench wM a 5'
minimum horizontal separWon from ocher underground Wan.
3. Adjust ell manholes, catch baud, and valves in pubRt rghb -o -way or
easements after asphalt paving.
1. MI methods and materiels Bali mad qty of Thad, Infrastructure Design and
Construction Standards, and the arrant king Ceuney Sues= Water Design
Manual, unfau otherwise approved,
2. Mark all storm drain Inbb MM 'Dump No Waste' and either 'Drelna to
Strums', 'Drain to Wetlands -, or `Drains to Groundwater, a applicable.
3. Driveway adverts shall be of sufficient length to provide • minimum 3:1 slope
from the edge of the driveway to the bottom of the akin. Culverts tail have
beveled end maims that match the 1141 elope.
4. Por sings family construction provide one of the MOowing nobs:
• drab filer rummies tnMUcted an lob caned by wll4Nawn mot
p Oda' dowapad 111810 con arm�are le as, epprev14 eOostdes
• ask amts residences ooneructed on bb Heated by erbdMpon mat downszout dilution w a aemndq b the eppaved
ebd MM
OR.
• 9apia fondly madmen constructed on lob crated by subdivision meat
amide perforated etuD cut HanneOlo• according to taw approved
meals/We.
a. Cporneb lnal (b1wt bottom with ms, Wades lupattor. Provide a wire
or ober daeceen device and mark rua,oa bla0on 011111 a 5 -foot Yee
sake, burled 441st and labeled'atone' c'e ll•.
1. Th�Mbt eorponge stop, ester es** Rea, and meters.
Tre1 Gay gar Tukwee .01 khsbp as rn.*,.
2. Premise tee all wear mains and appurtenances.
5. Ptah an moms* new, dowse, or Maked wear main
4. 1nla11 rabslned sate nee beds, lass, and other dkaalon denote
5. Ad miter mains shall have a blow -calf eseen y et low post and an gar Vaum
miler mho at Men palm of main.
6. rudee ere hydrant assembly so R sands plumb and a that the Iowat out* b
et le• Mebm the misled grade. The sessile emu have a dear pens mound
hya1m 1111 leer se and Me bumper pot sell floe Mast or are scar.
7. Me Mealier of • 8re ens bettdlow Arsenate dime Installed outsets the
budding and underprouhd, shall haw a aye 1D ornate of 0ompsbnCy or ■
Level U camater% 1Tallt11e of ccepabncy. It the Inetaeer le efferent than
the billion prpwnpm deeper, ten de hotelier mud camp, son. and data
Ma plan, In addition is Tdb deeener's ebmp, 49nebre, end date.
1. Alt m1 cads and ieau
1. Alt 181111041 3N m1wb1 null men cry of Tuk50a l/If/aahrLLl,I Darpn and
O 0*08 O, 51084.41, 1485.1!18180* aporowd.
1. TM Contactor Mil mark dm end of die nd• sewer, Weida the propet11W,
• an a 4 root Orlin" is teaed 2 a 4, burled In the ground 4 sec 1s, Ousted
O'IT5 IN FILTER FABRIC 91011 BE 0184 ;C
AT POSTS. USE STAPLES. PRE RRh05, OR
EOIIV4LEN1 TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS
POS SPAONG MAY BE INCREASED
TO B' IF MIRE BACKING IS USED
NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE
INSTALLED ALONG CO:TDUR 1HE7E4ER POSSIBLE
SW1/4, SEC 26, TWP 23N, RGE 4E
2 ".1" 87 14 Go. WRE lit
EOAVALENT. W STAADARD
STRENGTH FABRIC USED
FILTER FABRIC
MINIMUM 48'.4' 101'4"0■
BACKFAl TRENCH MTH
NATIVE SEAL Oi 3/4' -1.5'
WASHED GRAVEL
2'•l' ROW PCSTS. 'HEEL FENCE
POSTS. RE1AR, OR EOJIVALENT
SILT FENCE
NTS
INSTALL DRIVEWAY CULVERT IF TNERE
15 A ROADSIDE DITCH PRESENT, AS
PER KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS
4 " -8" QUARRY SPALLS
GEOTEXTILE
12' MIN. THICKNESS
PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF
INGRESS /EGRESS AREA. -
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
NTS
SOLID
WALLS
FILTER MEDIA
FOR DEWATERING =
III
- CATCH BASIN
OVERFLOW
GRATE
POROUS BOTTOM
I
=Ji
NOTE: THIS DETAIL I5 ONLY
SCHEMATIC. ANY INSERT IS
ALLOWED THAT HAS A MIN.
0.5 C.F. OF STORAGE. THE MEANS
TO DEWATER THE STORED
SEDIMENT, AN OVERFLOW. AND
CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED.
INSTALL IN ALL CATCH BASINS ALONG FRONTAGE AND
DOWNSTREAM OF SITE. INSTALL IN NCW CATCH BASINS
UNTIL 517E IS STABILIZED.
1IAINTFNANCE STANDARDS
1. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT ON OR AROUND THE FILTER FA3RIC PROTECTION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
SEDIMENT SHALL NOT 8E REMOVED WITH WATER, AND ALL SEDIMENT MUST BE DISPOSED OF AS FILL ON SITE OR
HAULED OFT SITE.
2. ANY SEDIMENT IN THE CATCH 548518 INSERT SHALL 8E REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS FILLED CNE -THIRD
OF THE AVAILABLE STORAGE. THE FILTER MEDIA FOR THE INSERT SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED AT LEAST
MONTHLY.
3. REGULAR MAINTENANCE IS CRITICAL FOR MOTH FORMS O° CATCH BASIN PROTECTION. UNLIKE MANY FORMS OF
PROTECTION THE FAIL GRADUALLY. CATCH BASIN PROTECTION WILL =AIL SUCDENLY AND COMPLETELY IF NCT
MAINTAINED PROPERLY.
CATCH BASIN FILTER
NTS
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
17401 SCUTHCEN TER PKWY
DATE: 5/3/04
CES: CCD
SCALE: AS NOTED
C'WN: OCD
NOTES & DETAILS
CCN TACT:
884U CEC4111
117 E L00104 5T. 0230
SEATTLE. 'WA 98102
PHONE: 2C5 -045 -4964
4of4
IJ T LoeAT•oLl OF T415
S Ru BED IS 4 56 FT. NORTH'
WEST FROM CORNER of 6LD6.
•
2- '.11uN1C5:N13:0K'
II- Illuutett.$1.11.114.P.
2- 'BOwl.ALL MAPLE
- `2 T4YP I' UM 2. .LE eb JJl LUSH ',)
-�- IS-NY /!4'CUM 2.OLD BOLDJJNIPBJL -/ J /r'_
I • SLEUDk& NIUORI CV►RLSS
1- ROSE 6Low• BARBS
-" -- a''eowH.LL AMwL E
1 ■ (0416 0W'BARi 2R ,I2
•
T 4- TRUMIlT HOUl Yl UC'1 LE(.05 rat L.'0I0 )J
- r20 -wvIp Q'CUM•
• ■0- NY PER 4(.A - .
0(1571136 LAMDSCAPILI6
�� ', TTAB'-AL ;kit
f1LAAAtiS OAY 12.44-54e0 .2. CALICR `.
�• '' 4,0000 vrevIIP >ao+l�pl -L r eALDrR •
lYb� C 4G2 PAL *WIN 3 Et1![I'idlA7. 5 - 6 T7
r �zn w31 I A *W 2 •
! R 115' C'iiQLSJ KRaL�l0 1 +GP'R'X RE'" 5 (.,7�
6L.o TFED>!I . ItY Z hIiFD ft-¢R Lea El N A�.ATA L4*OT CTA 5,01-
•1lt+cQ � TOW P.4bQi✓ 1✓,41lCVQ. 5 (�L
J!/IIG?NS'Q3CACy0 61.b (IQEO � (,4L
•iX "^ i e'%iX0 1RF4- 5 QM_'
A '6LiLF STat4,41. T41q
'1495KLIV 06.4
41,1 11,1' - •
, • • 9 -KIN y1CMIU DICK
/h. 5-NM' RNBo
,•3 OFC 6.OLD Juu1PBR-
o v•:RawH4LL t1Aly.e
UOTF - •c1uAL IOCATIOU OP
5 LAUT
510 3 uORTH O.
eROAID,NS ,CO lNl 304.0 :OR v!
•
6' OLD 50LC.
Juui0E0.
-3 .R061 G1OW
B•ROBRRY
-- 1 - RAY WOOD
ASH
24 KINIIGK'
ILII.IL;IC0.
(
6 "MINO -GRIM SOy41AL0A'
1
1''1 1150 W AVAJIFIOBC "
UEW LE4LA/A:1,1,AX.
3' HIND •CtIMSOU• 4LALe4
1 - RAIU60• *•05105'
NEW ZEALAUO ALAK
•
3- i'M1N0•G1.1.460L1 A24LEA
r
P A Q K 1 y Co
a - ►iv RINSE sot6
-4 60M4 2144• (7000
TL g -
OAT511 . sa2 try Slim nu..
!Una M111. 493 NT. or
4,24455055 Tut, 0./5!*0[0510
Iva m164 (2 ise Tots)
BST C!0ML AT uV WRY 11T-
4116 ARABS
14W. 3. 64614 M01.GM
a Ir* ON,50tYA2'TD•►6
BOIL u0. *PttL 1 So 7.10(3(5.
`4507. MKIY1 SAIL: *0755. -
ay., Bil0* ROOF 01014
0/1 64.% VA .P Wa04P
gaylc1 'Avis ot swum.
f... Mw. 2%IASWes s14IV 6 5*Et7Y4BCC or
-., I• . *At f16Ea" YWeS/ BAYOjaIU
7466 STAKYLIG DETAIL (oluouous<c4LUFlaS) 5142UB PLA LITE 'LI6'DETAIL
'.140 1040.6. .
(
4 - KIUNICKIUNICP.
J
3. OLD GOLD JUNI ►ER
1 -'5055 GLOW' 6•16EC&Y
4- RAYWOOD ASH
2•5*41F WIt■6815 Eu022YMU5
+': O'•.KI�IIJIC KI(I Li1GK \� •
- -1- BLOG6000ID
FdAP4NE51 1j0AP L!
4004p OLO(e
R4ISF6o:8.Y
LioTt S
000M14 SHu10E454M55 .FalDGtnln5,01.4M5aff26P OGEK5Q OR'`0AfiEM0 HLR4i1Wi- olumc5RAt1Oi '
WALL m!nE51AR50IRCSAA LIEAAIDJPOtp7(2T ntpcPmraw- 05W01. u 0.1004 was Alamo sc.656•Noa65
, .NALF !"5' 5011„y5 DOI YAW 55 05105 -S24FL TEEM AtT ai65L+IOECIPE ?COMM
Wironsame am...w ritingssN0L1.4E too woo owscAPt 30T0 M5 0AL PL'Al155104.1. . EecAurA zeo-
11cfoLn.0cE cowtotcen".3+RAE4M05M*G ■01601:6021•52 SOW* m030tLW216■1131C
- F-
AMR' MSIRiReOFMAAII EAR, AUNIRKR.OtOM LAtcst00(60Kt17 A10RYY itieei 09OLINm ARLY TO11YGr
u*41N
3 -'PJA1 50050.- -
3 -.DWARF MU6H0 P000-'- --
4 - K INNIGKINNICK- -. -.._ �t
3- '1•1I1•10- CRI5LSOti A24LEA
20 -KINNIGKINNIGK-
I- K05TER' BLUE SPRUCE
Ite KQ
SO'KI 61.Jl ♦15tYP
out. 6016 ,21iU1 ►!!ti+
$FIdIi6tuniA44H5 L. {`tiv44 CM�
•} •::~46¢&411, YItIl,Bi6'Q_6tl 01JYML.4
•
S O U Ti/CfAlTER PAR K W AV
50.1000 6.3 -04
5= 000 6015 J0L11PER
Lou: a OED.
<..0 u
• 9. HYPERICUM
1 LENDER 5100111
CV P4155
2 -'PJ1, 0.140 D0.
-5 -DWARF MU6H0 P: LIE
6- K:NU11K,UU;CK
I 'BOWHALL MAPLE
2- KINNILI4IIJUICK
1-.50,0/HALL' MAPLE
3• DWARF Mu6H01!ME
.4-KlUINIe- kINNICK-
LP
' *26150. BIDE
SPRUCE
B
25-ALMOLEA KIUNICKIN NIr -i,
IMSOIJ
SI, bF
WAS 'IG100
7 pr
i
r0., -lt
IF.C111'; N(1 235
DATE
6 -8-04
LALIDSCAPE PLAID
SCALE ,
1' =10 -0' •
ORAWN
6. E.
3Nu
1 OF
5C-3 RETAIL 6UILDIma.
17401 sourNcENTra. PARKWAY TUKWILA, 'WA
CQ•I• B. ESVELT LAUbSC4PE ARCHITECT
15845 55 213TH RBNTONA WA 98038 (423)4324082
•
•
C.
:011108•66111.!.
•
10o•rl 1.0(..ar.00 OP THIS
Tritio DEA IS 6,7.,11.t..
S6 Pr. voatowLST or
•taltuart o111,6A0A.
0/4" ScoLD. 40 PV4 MAIM
• 95 140 P44S 16658 1..Dift ALL PiAviE86 •
• o
o- n•-•
• 72?."Lu:',:4',14?..7.1:"•).;..1`,'.7A-c
•
*- •'•
SPQ %UK LER' LE'6EIJb
symbol. arr 6411411.46*.rr " •
- 1 •8414760. APIA/ WM 64888 618.8006 .01116371088 SWAT - 088 *
Rawl!. 11. LSP• 8 • 004-1,063 :.014TROLL.10..
O '14614140880• 667 I. GATE VALVE 14,114 PAO
o • wicuous. SSO 1" Douoci &cp. 548.46
127 1 'woLata& 600 1" 81tEASuCti 066141401146 VALVE
• 'RAW 11.2.D 32. 11/4" efau•A couPLo /16 VALVE wit... 53 PK p,cv
1> "A 'C pAmPpow. V4" mauu.41._ .18.16LE 804484048.01 .00/71.1 0. EY
It 8 RAM (1.0.17 .00- P64 I t LEA.TE,C V•LvE
• 2 11164846.00 606 • )26 .5.00068168' PoP• uP AP R11.1v....E12.
.4 34 5004-115
• 12 1806-120
▪ 21 1806-15.S5T
▪ 11 . 1806- IS 1ST
.0- 41 t 8.06- 5GST 6 97E1.414 BU1101.t12. POP • up
. ,• '
• - •
• - • •
L A SS 140 •Vi
AL DS vIDIO 0840{0 AALPAYI/A6
• LocATe AS 082.6CTEO AV 41888.844. C 04TOActo0-
ci Acuff/ tow I. uo. - - - 14500E4 40 PvC MAIL■
APP1248. OPM " 8.8.458 200 P58. L ATE 2•L
• C.LAAS 160 Pvc SLtEv..vG (1. pint SPR. 8181 50088018 016E0 PAsr,844 )
itasmasediam ..:' ..•.-.,: - :. : . . , . -
...,. eop. imam rat Lacm:coor 40 Aciampa ,o ho.suFArnmess SPAo4c47010 • • -
.. . 0: .4414 MIS u fEfi"• n . 1110104C. oAte7 44. 4- 1.01. oe .c. usp2. 0 0 P.4. A. LLEDro. p nu, D 0 ==.• . •
- , D . ' 1111.,206.1441114/0ii1040 470441c amp 4444 a t.440119461 1aVEIE110108 MIFFS 85046E to u2 at fi,
-.....• • 4 , • feru.s.0,41104V1.DADDINDJALODAIN rw4.8145)D4 vaDurAt* sat sikEiis row anarus. tot cauntyVALK a.420/19t I ca
•--, MEWL. COURESIFIELE111071 ifflOffaTADON■00.1110. A6rElt P01740: O MOP OUST rt. Lo7.4 sive),
. , . . . , ..
.. . . . .
. . s: • otcrpeute.s tow nixed."' MO.* MR. Ir• cowmen surias ormarive yr r4i.■ywive ems oro. ow. Lai.
".. . ,, 047t V' DIMP.AME. Of 6.1161L
.. = ••.: EAl. iEf' *R' fO-a.5441a.
A044444.. 44. 7 PaAM74244145 Fve D
7 AAWLIfAWw*iok m
. .
-ormacroastecaogrock-mnisowsameriesameomu.atte=40'"Imst#69""•4'.`
. • .- • °Thtmoroot.","0"1"P"!'24'.4,4!**.la. Wima•••••••••c•mt Foursome oses•Fe. .. • .
IT6a8L68,IE85808 ia. air iiii . . ' ' ',ism swoon:yr..' savictunwigar.:gle ...
......., . Arnulataseuerams, • EIANIMEEiVAX10.111.0146160.1•10171616111EfiZr
. ..
0
ComT,JU•741:.1 of t.irteurr
-..•• T 403055 400653 DIP IV.
(. P.P.:P.a. 814.4 A7 Aflov
".••••.;7'1,-,.•••••.•i;• 7
o'u r,w c /JF P.4aMW4
• •
•
2.844565 8-3.04
DATE
87 -8-04
5"it
l. 10 -
b1tAV.L.
C. 8.6
5.4117
Z of 2
SPZIK.114LER P1A 8.1
5C-3 ETAIL BuILD0.1c,
,1401 MCI8.4760 fARAWAI, T.111W88.A, WA
C2.616 D. ESVELT 8.4140554*E 4 2.5,-1.715T
13045 SE 28.306 8tuTo0, WA feoS6(427)432-1587
5 9,51'23- •
IS IN 21 A 1 G T L
. •
..4 :
C01.4AOH tESS DRIVE 19A1.
DING 1
Lew
19 SIGti
69v1
—__ oo-r`w
313. nnauwl.
LEXiST. F.H.
RET o\-
sHOpS
1I3S1 R.L. -
�fr
JOANN FABRIC
VICINITY MAP
SC -3 RETAIL BUILDING
SITE AREA: 47,6940
BLDG AREA: 20,315sf
ON SIIE PARKING 81
1 LAND >APE AREA: 4,827st
1
■ SITE P
■
17,101 SOu ;FI t ;ENTER PARKWAY
1 rlolES.
1. PYION SIGN NOI 10 EXCLED 75sf PER SIDE.
1 2. IIEICIIT OF PYLON -SICN NOT i0 EXCEED 35' A.F.G.
1 3. SIZE LIGHTING
1 6 WALL PACKS a 175W EACH = 1,050W
2 POLE MOUNTED SHOE BOX LIGHTS CO 175W EACH = 350W
1 11 SCONCE LIGH1S @ 100W EACH = 1,100W
L A N
1
BORDERS BOOKSTORE
1
1
1
1
1
TOTAL WATTS = 2,500W
4. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WATTS ® 0,20W /SF = 5,476W
1
■
LLON 52,21
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
JUN 0 9 2004
PERMIT CENTER
RETAIL BUILDIN
17401 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
TUKW1LA,• WASHINGTON