Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E04-018 - CENDANT CAR RENTAL GROUP - LEWIS AND CLARK BUILDING DEMOLITION / NEW QUICK TURNAROUND FACILITYThis record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below. E04 -018 Cendant Car Rental Group 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard RECORDS DIGITAL D- ) EXEMPTION LOG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION F,age # Code Exemption � � �� Brief Explsnatoty Description, Statute /Rule The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress' intent that social security numbers are a private concern. As such, individuals' social security Personal Information — numbers are redacted to protect those Social Security Numbers individuals' privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec. 5 U.S.C. sec. DR1 Generally — 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure 552(a); RCW 552(a); RCW under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington 42.56.070(1) 42.56.070(1) State Public Records Act, which exempts under the PRA records or information exempt or prohibited from disclosure under any other statute. Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit Personal Information — expiration dates, or bank or other financial RCW 105,267 DR2 Financial Information — account numbers, which are exempt from 42.56.230(5) RCW 42.56.230(4 5) disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5), except when disclosure is expressly required by or governed by other law. CEDANT CAR GROUP 15820 TIB E04 -018 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E04 -018 Applied: 09/27/2004 Issue Date: 03/08/2005 Status: APPROVED Applicant: CENDANT CAR RENTAL GROUP Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The City has received a development application from Cendant Car Group to convert the existing Lewis and Clark Recreation site into a regional facility for their rental operations. Site work includes the demolition of the existing theater, construction of a new Quick Turnaround Facility (QTA), import of fill material to level off of the construction site, construction of a security fence, installation of a security booth, planting of new landscaping material, and construction of full frontage improvements along S. 160th Street. Location of Proposal: Address: 15820 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BL TUKW Parcel Number: 2223049001 Section/Township /Range: SW 1/4 section 22, Township 23N, Range 4E. The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by I oZ O c. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS E04 -018 Printed: 03 -04 -2005 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION >\, ' A `kv 6(kk_ HEREBY DECLARE THAT Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of'Non- Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other . =. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 2005 day of Project Name: b„..41(bAt Cet 424z Project Number: E Q q- o ! g Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: -9'147L__ g4A-ck, P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM CHE.ST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE P•T MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE /AGENCIES OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY -- J I5 Rio �'4k I ST " O DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMEN () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) 9EPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES )pEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* eiv ( )`OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. ASSE SOR'S OFFICE C D " U, stfA ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) ()WEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( ) POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) HEALTH DEPT ` �� � " (kORT OF SEATTLE ' `9'f‘ `9'f‘ () K.C. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ENTON PLANNING DEPT n CITY OF SEA-TAC p�S -((i� I" I ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE �� P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY .- tVL 1 (`) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON OUWAMISH RIVER () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ),$W K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ISHERIES PROGRAM WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WVWV a.41 Pet, IC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR 416TS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ ADM INI STRATI V E\FORM S \CHKLI ST. DOC Parties of Record Mr. Michael J. Layton Demco Law Firm, P.S 5224 Wilson Ave S, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98118 Mr. Walter H. Olsen, Jr. 604 W. Meeker St, Suite 101 Kent, WA 98032 Dougherty Family Limited PA 15848 Pacific Hwy S Tukwila, WA 98188 DOUGHTERY FAMILY LIMITED PA PO Box 2324 Renton, WA 98506 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director May 16, 2005 King County Library System Administrative Offices 960 Newport Way NW Issaquah, WA 98027 RE: Report Document Dear King County Library: t4)- phayrnbot (1;64 66eud l Enclosed with this letter please find the following document, Historical Information on Lewis and Clark Murals, Lewis and Clark Theater /Bowl, 1 5820 Tukwila International Boulevard The document was prepared by Leonard Garfield, Executive Director of the Museum of History and Industry in Seattle. The murals referenced in the report will be demolished as part of a private redevelopment of the site. As part of the Environment Review for the project, the City required that the murals be photographed and that a formal report on the history of the murals be provided. The City has provided the report for possible inclusion in the King County Library system. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerel r _tr i1rand6n J. Mile Assistant Planner cc. File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director May 16, 2005 Gina Vale Tukwila Historical Society 12607 East Marginal Way S Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: Report Document Dear Ms Vale: Enclosed with this letter please find the following document, Historical Information on Lewis and Clark Murals, Lewis and Clark Theater /Bowl, 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard The document was prepared by Leonard Garfield, Executive Director of the Museum of History and Industry in Seattle. The murals referenced in the report will be demolished as part of a private redevelopment of the site. As part of the Environment Review for the project, the City required that the murals be photographed and that a formal report on the history of the murals be provided. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles(aci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 =3665 HISTORICAL INFORMATION ON LEWIS AND CLARK MURALS LEWIS AND CLARK THEATER/BOWL 15820 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD TUKWILA WASHINGTON Prepared for Sterling Real Estate Organization (SRO) Prepared by Leonard Garfield Executive Director Museum of History and Industry (MOHAI) Seattle Washington April 2005 AUTHOR BOO Leonard Garfield is the Executive Director of the Museum of History & industry in Seattle, where he is responsible for maintaining a collection of over 100,000 rare artifacts, 2 million vintage photographs, an extensive archive and library, and a program of permanent and rotating exhibits all related to the history_ of King County and the Northwest. Before joining the museum, Garfield served as Manager of the King County Office of Cultural Resources from 1993 -1999, managing the programs of the King County .Landmarks & Heritage Commission and the King County Arts Commission. From 1985 -1993, Garfield served as Historic Preservation Coordinator for Washington State, where he administered the National Register of Historic Places Program in Washington as well as the Washington State Arts Stabilization program. He previously worked for the State Historical Society of Wisconsin from 1978-to 1985, where he served as the state preservation historian. Garfield teaches historic preservation planning in the College of Architecture and Urban Design at the University of Washington.. Ile is the co- author of Built in Washington, an architectural history of the state published by Washington State University Press. Historical Information Summary Lewis and Clark Mural Lewis and Clark Theatre and Bowl Tukwi la, Washington Completed 1957 Designed and executed by Klee Wyk Studio, Nisqually, WA; Del McBride, principal designer Commissioned by Fred Danz, Sterling Recreation Organization, Bellevue, WA Content: Large -scale narrative. representation of. Lewis and Clark journey across North America to the I'aci.fic, painted directly on to the bowling alley walls. Background and Context: The Klee Wyk Studio and Gallery was an influential but short -lived artist collaborative located about 50 miles south of Seattle in Nisqually, Washington. Founded by I)cl McBride (1920 - 1998), the studio fostered an appreciation of Native American design traditions within contemporary architecture. McBride himself drew inspiration from his own ancestry — including Quinault and Cowlitz tribal leaders, Hudson Bay Company employees and American pioneer settlers. Together with partners Albert (Bud) McBride • (his brother), Oliver Tiedeman (his cousin), and Richard Schneider,.McBride's studio specialized in ceramic tile murals; mosaics, pottery, rugs, fabrics, graphic design, jewelry and building elements, most featuring stylized Northwest Native imagery. • . McBride grew up surrounded with stories of early life in Western Washington. Even as a teenager, McBride recorded the oral history of his grandmother's life on.the Nisqually reservation, and kept detailed notebooks recounting the stories and memories of other family elders. As a young man, McBride left the state briefly to attend the Art Center in Los Angeles in 1940, but returned home on the eve of World War [Ito combine his love of design with his fascination for history. He participated in the National Youth • Administration program, where he worked closely with renowned UW anthropologist Enna Gunther, an early authority on the design traditions of coastal Indians McBride opened the KIee Wyk Studio and Gallery on May 16, 1953 with the specific purpose of integrating Native design and contemporary craft. (The name, which means "laughing bear," was selected in honor of a collection of sketches, also called "Klee Wyk," by distinguished Canadian artist Emily Carr.) Located in rural Nisqually, the collaborative included McBride, who served as lead designer; Bud McBride, who built the studio, operated the printing press, and produced ceramics; Tiedeman, who painted and handled the business operations; and later, Schneider, who focused on ceramics. The studio was successful from the start, and designers and architects from Seattle and Tacoma frequently visited Nisqually. The studio received numerous commissions, particularly for decorative tile work (often hand- painted, then glazed and fired), and their commissions included decorative work for apartment buildings, offices, and private homes. Perhaps the best known of their commissions were the murals for West Seattle High School depicting Northwest Indian culture. In addition to the commissioned work, Klee Wyk showcased authentic Indian art, and Del himself lectured widely on the subject. For ten years, the studio was a leading factor in promoting post -War interest and appreciation of Native design, and Klee Wyk played a significant role in introducing the subject to a wider audience. But in 1963, facing financial challenges and the construction of Interstate 5 through the studio property, the collaborative disbanded. Del McBride continued his interest in Native subjects as a curator at the Washington State Capitol Museum in Olympia, where he served until shortly before his death in 1998: Description of the Lewis and Clark Mural: Together with the mural at West Seattle High School, the Lewis and Clark Mural is considered to be the most significant work of the Klee Wyk collaborative - -- -and one of its most unusual. Measuring 180 feet wide, 12 feet tall, and spanning 32 bowling lanes, the mural tells the story of the journey of Lewis and Clark and the Corps of Discovery as they headed west across North America to the Pacific, - highlighting the significant episodes and heroic aspects of the journey. The mural is painted directly onto the walls and is therefore an integral part of the structure. According to surviving members of the collaborative, Klee Wyk was approached directly by Fred Danz; Owner of the Sterling Recreation. Organization, who, had built a major new suburban movie theatre and bowling alley on Highway 99 in the Tukwila community south of Seattle. Danz was the son of John Danz, a Russian immigrant who came to Seattle in 1901 and soon established a theatre chain throughout the Northwest. In the suburban boom that followed World War 11, Danz pioneered new theatres in the growing communities surrounding Seattle. Beginning with the Northgate Theatre in the nation's first modern shopping center, Danz soon built such landmarks as the John Danz Theatre in Bellevue and, in 1956, the Lewis and Clark Theatre and Bowl in Tukwila. The theatre featured a very large single- screen auditorium (the first film shown was "War and Peace "), with over 2,000 seats in the auditorium and a 60- foot -wide screen. The main auditorium also featured murals of Lewis, Clark and Native Americans filling the'side walls. But the most notable innovation of the facility was the construction of an adjacent howling alley, with 36 lanes, which, combined with the theatre, created a family entertainment complex long before such "complexes" were common. To enliven the bowling alley, Danz sought decoration that would relate to the Lewis and Clark theme. And in McBride he found a responsive artist. Del went to work immediately, exhaustively researching the Lewis and Clark story in order to develop his theme and insure accuracy. The result was an entirely original depiction of the journey, highlighting major episodes along the route. When the design was complete, McBride submitted a watercolor sketch to Danz far approval. The sieniticance of the commission was obvious to the Klee Wyk artists — not just because oi'the scale of the work but because the work would require painting directly on to plaster (the only commission of its kind in the studio's history). The unique character of the commission required new techniques for Klee Wyk. Del's watercolor sketches were projected onto the wall, which was covered with butcher paper. Cartoons were made from these enlarged projections, capturing the main scenes and figures ot'the mural. Bud worked on these cartoon enlargements, while Del and Richard did the actual painting and completed the backgrounds. Richard also served another role — he modeled for the characters, variously wearing buckskin or carrying a rifle so that Del could get the scene just right. The execution of the murals had another unique element. Because Danz had already opened his howling alley, work on the murals could only he completed while the alley was closed for the evening. According to the surviving artists, the team would begin work at about 1, o'clock in the morning, and work until dawn, painting from ladders to reach the higher elevations, and all the while wearing bowling shoes to protect the lanes. The job took several months to complete. When finished: the Lewis and Clark mural was a major achievement for Klee Wyk and a major attraction for Danz. The studio members recall Mr. Danz.proudly commenting that it was the best money he ever spent on decoration. The mural remained well preserved through the rest of the century until the closure of the bowling alley in the 1990s. The Lewis and Clark mural is truly a site- specific artwork, designed for an unusual setting with unique dimensions. SRO, the property owner, has conscientiously sought to find an alternative venue for the work. However, because the murals are painted directly onto the wall surfaces, and because of their imposing scale, no museum in the state has the capacity to either display or store the artwork. As a result, the owner has made a photographic record of this unique artwork, providing documentary evidence that will survive even as the site transitions to new uses in the new century. Mayor Frank Hansen Deputy Mayor Terry Anderson Councilmembers Gene Fisher Chris Wythe Ralph Shape Joe Brennan Don DeHan "The Hospitality City" City Manager Bruce A. Rayburn Assistant City Manager Craig R. Ward City Attorney Mary E. Mirante Bartolo City Clerk Judith L. Cary PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING DIVISION Via Mail & eMail February 28, 2005 Michael Aippersbach Michael Aippersbach and Associates P. 0. Box 95429 Seattle, WA 98145 RE: Frontage Improvements Deferral Request Cendant Car Group Applications L04 -064 and E04 -018 Dear Mr. Aippersbach: The Engineering Division has reviewed the frontage improvement deferral request. The Engineering Division has reviewed the request and has recommended approval of the deferral request subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner shall dedicate 15 ft of additional right -of -way along their frontage with S. 160th St. so that the City may install the improvements being deferred. 2. The applicant shall pay to the City of SeaTac a sum of money ($157,867.58) equal to the estimated per linear foot cost of the improvements ($199.57 per linear foot 2007 dollars) times the frontage distance (494 LF)on S. 160th St. and the estimated per square foot face of a MSE (mechanically stabilized earth) wall with an average height of 4 feet for the frontage distance (494 LF) along S. 160th St. Frontage Improvement Costs: $199.57 per LF x 494 LF = $ 98,587.58 4800 South 188th Street • SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 City Hall: 206.973.4800 • Fax: 206.973.4809 • TDD: 206.973.4808 • www.ci.seatac.wa.us DI -l91 Cendant Car Group Page 2 of 2 Wall Costs: $ 30.00 per SF Face x 1976 SF Face, = $ 59,280.00 Total Estimated Cost to Be Contributed to a CIP Fund: $157,867.58 These funds shall be placed by the City of SeaTac into the City's Transportation Improvement Fund to be used on either or both of the following Capital Improvement Projects: ST-015 -- 34th Ave. S. (from S. 160th St. to S. 176th St.). ST -122 — Military Rd. S. (from S. 160th St. to S. 179th St.). If you have any questions please contact me at 206 - 973 -4720 or Dixie Hallenberger, P.E. at 206 - 973 -4734. Sincerely, Dale Schroeder, P.E. Public Works Director cc: DI -191 Julie Elsensohn, Senior Assistant City Attorney Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner, City of Tukwila Tom Gut, P.E., City Engineer Dixie Hallenberger, P.E., Eng. Tech. Supervisor Lou Larsen, Pacific Engineering Design, LLC • MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster, Director From: Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner Date: February 24, 2005 Re: E04 -018 (SEPA Determination) Cendant Car Facility 15820 Tukwila International Blvd (TIB) Submitted Documents: SEPA Checklist, revised January 11, 2005, prepared by applicant Wildlife Report, dated February 7, 2005, prepared by B -12 Wetland Consulting Traffic Impact Assessment, dated October 2004, prepared by Transportation Solutions Inc Letter from David Schooler, dated February 10, 2005 requesting that frontage improvements be deferred Letter from David Schooler, dated February 17, 2005 regarding agreement to install frontage improvements Public Comments: Letter from Michael Layton, dated November 19, 2004 regarding access to 15820 International Blvd. Letter from Walter H. Olsen Jr., dated November 22, 2004 regarding access to 15820 International Blvd. Letter from Washington State Historical Society, dated November 2004 regarding murals located on the site. Letter from Chander Eason, dated January 12, 2005, response to City's SEPA comments Letter from City of Seatac, dated February 28, 2005, regarding applicant's frontage deferment request and conditions placed on approval of the request Project Description: The City has received a development application from Cendant Car Group to convert the existing Lewis and Clark Recreation site into a regional facility for their rental operations. Site work includes the demolition of the existing theater, construction of a new Quick Turnaround Facility (QTA), import of fill material to level off of the construction site, construction of a security fence, installation of a security Cendant Car Facility E04 -018, CC (L04 -064) SEPA Staff Report booth, planting of new landscaping material, and construction of frontage improvements along S. 160th Street. The property is located in the SW 1/4 section 22, Township 23N, Range 4E., W.M. The site is directly south of State Route 518 and is bordered by TIB and S.160`h Street. The two adjacent rights of ways are within the jurisdiction of the City of Seatac. Adjacent lands uses include a park and fly to the east, residential dwellings to the south, Dollar Rent a car is located directly to the southwest, El Charro Mexican Restaurant, and Ace Hardware border the site to the west. Located to the north on the subject property is a facility operated by the Washington State Patrol. Agencies with Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology (DOE) City of Seatac Other Required Permits: Land Altering/Grading /Preload Permit Approval Design Review Approval Building/Demolition Permits Right of Way Permit Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth City of Tukwila, Public Works City of Tukwila, Board of Architectural Review City of Tukwila, Community Development City of Seatac The topography of the site is generally flat with a majority of the slopes ranging from one to five percent. Along the eastern edge of the property is a shallow ravine that has a slope in excess of 40 percent. However, no work will occur in this area. The Soil Survey of King County Area identifies the soil on the site as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. The applicant has noted that the hard plain layer for this soil is located 20 to 40 inches below the surface. According to the SEPA Checklist there is no indication of unstable soils on the site or in the immediate vicinity. There is a chance of erosion during the construction activities on the site. The applicant will be required to submit an erosion control plan as part of the land - altering permit. During construction, Best Management Practices (BMP) will be used to reduce and control erosion. The demolition work requires the placement of fill to bring the site level with the surrounding site. The applicant has noted that approximately 500 cubic yards of fill will be brought to the site. A permit from the City of Tukwila will be required for this land altering. Q:\ Developments \Cendant \sepa - staffrpt.doc Cendant Car Facility E04 -018, CC (L04 -064) SEPA Staff Report When the project is complete approximately 80.14 percent of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces. •Air Construction activities may have some impact on air quality. The impacts may include dust particles and automobile exhausts. Upon completion of the project the site will generate auto emissions. Water Gilliam Creek is located on the perimeter of the proposed site. No work is proposed within the creek area or its associated buffer. Any work proposed within the creek area of buffer will require compliance with the City of Tukwila Sensitive Area Ordinance and would likely also require additional state permits. Gilliam Creek is utilized by upland properties for removal of stormwater. Stormwater from the subject site will be discharged into Gilliam Creek via an existing 36 inch diameter pipe that transverses the southern portion of the property. Portions of Gilliam Creek are considered Salmon bearing and are classified as a Type II stream. In conversations with the City's Fishery Biologist, this portion of Gilliam Creek is not Salmon bearing and is likely a Type III stream. Water quality treatment is required for the new pavement area that will replace the existing theater building. The drainage will be collected and routed through a water quality facility. The subject property is served by sewer and all wastewater from the site will be directed to the sewer system. The QTA car washing operation will also have to be connected to sanitary sewer. However, the QTA car wash does recycle nearly 90 percent of its water. Plants Existing trees on the site include, maple, alder, and fir trees. There is also existing landscaping that was part of the old Lewis and Clark Recreation Facility. Additional, landscaping was also installed as part of the Quik Park and Fly facility located to the east. The applicant has proposed retaining most of the existing vegetation. All large trees on the site will likely be maintained with this project. The applicant has proposed additional landscaping and the type, location, and amount of new landscaping will be reviewed during design review. Animals The applicant submitted a Wildlife Report, prepared by B -12 Wetland Consulting, Incorporated and there will be no new impacts to wildlife populations as a result of this project. Energy/Natural Resources During construction gasoline will be needed for operation of machinery and automobiles on the property. The project will have no affect on the potential for solar energy. Q:\ Developments \Cendant \sepa - staffrpt.doc • • Cendant Car Facility E04 -018, CC (L04 -064) SEPA Staff Report • Environmental Health The QTA facility will include an above ground gasoline storage tank. The tank has been located away from residential uses and crash barriers will be installed to prevent collisions with the tank. Geomatrix is preparing a SPCC plan in accordance with Federal, State, and Local regulations to address the potential for hazardous spills on the site. The Fire Department has noted that a permit would be required for the tank. AC units will be located on the top of the administration and maintenance buildings. According to the spec sheets of the units they will generate 82 dBA at the AC unit. A parapet wall will be used to provide a visual screen around the AC units. While the main function of the wall is to provide a visual screen, the wall will also help reduce the sound impacts from the AC units. Additionally, the nearest receiving property from the AC units is approximately 100 feet away. A landscaping buffer will be installed between the two properties, which will further reduce the noise impact from the AC units. Land /Shoreline Use The current zoning on the property is Regional Commercial (RC). The property is not located near a shoreline of state significance. The property had been used as a bowling alley and movie theater. Both of these operations have ceased and currently there is an un- permitted church located in the theater. The proposed Cendant facility will required that the church relocate. The northeast landscape edge of the existing development at the project site adjoins a ravine. A portion of this ravine contains some environmentally sensitive areas such as steep slopes and a type II stream (Gilliam Creek). Sheet flow from the parking area to the ravine is currently prevented by use of catch basins and curbing. Housing Not Applicable Aesthetics The mechanical enclosure on the maintenance facility will have a maximum height of 36 feet. The materials of the principal building include: • Painted split face concrete masonry blocks • Painted hardiplank veneer • Split face CMU blocks • Painted concrete walls • Prefinished metal fascia • Wall panels and canopies • Painted glu -lam beams Q:\ Developments \Cendant \sepa - staffrpt.doc Cendant Car Facility E04 -018, CC (L04 -064) SEPA Staff Report • Anodized aluminum glass storefront with glass windows and doors The subject project is subject to Design Review and the Tukwila International Blvd Design Guidelines. As part of the design review, the entire landscaping on the site must be brought up to current standards. • Light and Glare Sources of lighting on the site include parking lot lights, headlights on cars entering and exiting the site, and lights from the three buildings on the site. In order to reduce light impacts from the project, all site lights will have full cut -off shields so that no light glare is present off site. Recreation None Historic and Cultural Preservation Within the theater and bowling are murals that were painted in the 1950s. The applicant is currently proposing to demolish the murals as part of the TI and demolish work. The applicant has agreed to have the murals documented using the standards of the Historic American Building Survey (HABS). This report must be submitted to the City prior to the release of any demolish permits on the site. • Transportation Access to the site is via International Boulevard and S. 160th Street. S. 160th Street will serve as the primary access to the facility. The site will have a total of 990 parking spaces. However, with regards to the City's Development standards, a majority of these parking spaces will not be considered parking stalls and thus would not have to meet the landscaping requirements for parking. During the Notice of Application period the City of Seatac noted some possible safety concerns regarding ingress and egress from the site from S. 160th Street. In order to minimize the impacts from the project on S. 160`h•Street, the applicant has agreed to provide a dedication of right of way to the City of Seatac for the future construction of a left turn lane along S. 160`h Street. A total of 109 peak hour trips will be generated as a result of the proposed project. City code requires that the installation of full frontage improvements along S. 160th Street. Since the right of way is located in the City of Seatac the applicant will be required to coordinate with Seatac for the installation of these improvements. Q:\ Developments \Cendant \sepa - staffrpt.doc Cendant Car Facility E04 -018, CC (L04 -064) SEPA Staff Report Public Services Bus service is available along International Blvd. Additionally, the Tukwila International Blvd Link Light Rail Station will be located to the north of the Cendant Facility. Utilities All necessary utilities are located on the subject parcel. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance Q:\ Developments \Cendant \sepa - staffrpt.doc David 5chooler President (425) 455 -8167 davids @sterlingrealty.com February 17, 2005 • • STERLING REALTY ORGANIZATION Ff6 22 2005 o Ezra g y OPT Brandon Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 -2544 Re: Frontage Improvements — Cendant Car Rental Project — Lewis & Clark Site Application #'s L04 -064 & E04 -018 Dear Mr. Miles: For purposes of the SEPA Determination portion of the above - proposed project, we as the underlying property owner acknowledge our responsibility for providing full frontage improvements per the requirements of the City of SeaTac's Municipal Code (SeaTac letter to Tukwila dated December 10, 2004). To date, we have filed with the City of SeaTac a request to defer those improvements under provisions in their municipal code. Should we not receive an approval to defer those frontage improvements, we agree to provide them. Sincerely, jitc,(6)01 fC 0 David Schooler President cc: Karl Westermann, Cendant Michael Aippersbach 600 106th Ave. M.E., Bellevue, WA, Suite 200 • Mail to: P.O. Box 91723, Bellevue, WA 98009 -1723 (425) 455 -8100 • Fax (425) 455 -8165 Michael Aippersbach & Associates Planning and Development Services February 10, 2005 Dale L. Schroeder. P.E. Director of Public Works City of SeaTac 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac WA 98188 -8605 Hand Delivered Re: Deferral of Frontage Improvements for Cendant Project Lewis & Clark Site —15820 International Boulevard Dear Mr. Schroeder: As agent for Cendant Car Rental Group, under the provisions in SeaTac's Municipal Code, we are submitting a request for the deferral of required frontage improvements along S. 160th, immediately east of Dollar Rent A Car (which is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of International Boulevard and S. 160th Street). Our request includes the deferral of the requirement to have an approved set of design plans for the • frontage improvements prior to obtaining construction permits from the City of Tukwila. The City of Tukwila is currently conducting the SEPA Review process and the City of SeaTac's response for that SEPA Review is to not allow the issuance of any permits until street frontage improvement plans have been approved, needed right -of -way has been dedicated, and a performance bond submitted. It is our objective to obtain certain construction permits (tenant improvements and a demo permit), upon the issuance of the SEPA Determination and completion of the appeal period. We understand we will be required to have the underlying property owner, Sterling Realty Organization (SRO) dedicate sufficient right -of -way to include both the frontage improvements (landscaping and a sidewalk) and a retaining wall to support a sidewalk at street grade and submit a cash contribution for those frontage improvements. Cendant's civil engineer, Lou Larsen of Pacific Engineering Design, is currently working with Dixie Hallenberger of your office concerning the details of the required frontage improvements, the amount of right -of -way dedication to be deeded, and the amount of the cash contribution required. PO Box 95429 - Seattle, Washington 98145 - (206) 523- 3764/Fax: (206) 524 -0337 Page 2 • • Ltr from Aippersbach & Associates to D. Schroeder, City of SeaTac /02 -10 -05 We would appreciate a reply as soon as possible on our deferral request so that we can expedite the completion of the proposed Cendant facility. Thank you for your time and assistance in this matter. If you have any questions you can reach me by phone at (206) 523 -3764, via e-mail at aipp@a,prodigy.net or fax me at (206) 524 -0337. Sincerely, Michael Aippersbac cc. Karl Westermann, Cendant Car Rental Group Mike Lancaster, SRO Chandler Eason, Blunk DiMattei Lou Larsen, Pacific Engineering delllmike/maa proj files/cendant.dsk: deferral letter to seatac - 02.09.05 PO Box 95429 - Seattle, Washington 98145 - (206) 523 -3764 psi TransportationSolutions, Inc. 8250.165th Avenue NE Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052-6628 T 425.883.4134 F 425. 867.0898 www.tsinw.com Sara Haile City of Tukwila Department of Public Works 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 RECEIVED FEB 11 2005' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 8, 2005 Subject: Cendent Car Rental Maintenance Facility This letter is responding to our conversation regarding clarification of two aspects of TSI's response of January 12, 2005 regarding clarifications to the traffic analysis prepared for the Cendent Car Rental Maintenance Facility. 1. Does the trip generation estimate include the car shuttle trips? Yes, the trip generation forecast does include the car shuttle vehicle traffic. In addition, it includes the van traffic, employee trips, ,and associated delivery and service activities. This breakdown is shown in the table on page 3/7 of the January 12, 2005 letter. 4. Are there any other intersections in the City of Tukwila impacted by 5 or more net new hips? There are no other intersections in the City of Tukwila that will be affected by five or more net new trips associated with the proposed redevelopment of the subject site by the Cendent Car Rental Maintenance Facility. Thank you for your careful review of the Traffic Impact Analysis and the January 12, 2005 addendum. Please feel free to call me if you have any other questions as a result of your review. Sincerely, Transportation Solutions, Inc. David D. Markley Principal cc Cyndy Knighton, City of Tukwila ✓Brandon ^Mile"slCity_of Tukwila' Karl Westermann, Cendant Car Rental Chandler Easton, Bluck Demattei Associates Architects Michael Aippersbach, Michael Aippersbach and Associates reg, va-&u 9. X00 oPM 3 r wM 9endanB ,ar MAaroup ASSOC NO.116 P.2/10 9724636106 T -246 P.002 F -793 February 7, 2005 Karl Westermann Cendant Car Rental Group PO Box 612707 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 B-12 Wetland Consultin •, Inc, 1143 W. MDSer ST. Kent, WA 98:02-5751 (vj2s38 15 (f) 2S18S2-4T32 Recoiso FEB 2225 coM Qp{�l g RE: Cendant Car Lot, 160th Street and International Boulevard- Wildlife Report B -12 Job #A5 -108 Dear Karl, This report is in response to the City of Tukwila's requirement for a Wildlife Study for your irregularly shaped 15.1 acre property located at 15820 International Boulevard in the City of Tukwila, Washington A Sewall Wetland Consulting. Inc. Company DEB 9.2009 3 :11PM. BLU . 115—cuu; u4,u PM rnuartandanr ua 1.0 Introduction EMATTEI ASSOC tal Group NO.116 P.3/10 9724636106 7-246 P.003 /010 F -703 Cendant/#A5- log 8-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 2 The current use of the property includes a theatre, a bowling alley and associated paved parking areas, The majority of the site is developed with the exception of the northeast corner where a small, east facing slope drops down to a small intermittent stream. The site is isolated by other commercial developments International Boulevard, and a highway. 2,0 Project Description Location and Project Action Area The project is to redevelop the site as a Car rental maintenance lot with a maintenance building, car wash and office buildings, All work will take place in existing paved areas or existing building footprints. Currently, runoff from the site flows into the storm drainage system on the site and flows un- detained and untreated into the headwater tributary on the east side of the site. The proposed project will use the current stormwater system with the addition of a water quality vault to treat runoff. The car wash water will be sent to the sanitary sewer lines and will not enter the stormwater system. 3.0 Habitat Description Existing Environmental Conditions 3.1.1 Biota. The site is already highly developed but still has one natural feature located near the east edge of the site, an intermittent tributary of Gilliam Creek. This tributary on -site is the very top of the stream channel and originates from stormwater collected off the site and International Boulevard. This stormwater flows un- detained and untreated into this small ditched channel. The channel is surrounded by dense blackberry and a few scattered deciduous trees. The stream flows through a long stretch of culven under SR518 before dropping several feet into a stream channel. Just downstream from this culvert drop and upstream of 42" Avenue South, there is an old concrete dam and flume which also inhibits fish use above the area near 42 ". Fish are lmown to use lower reaches Gilliam Creek about a mile east of the site near I -5. The portion of the tributary channel of Gilliam Creek on-site is intermittent, and has no known fish use. The sites channel also has culverts and barriers to fish below the site that would preclude fish from accessing the sites portion of the channel. No other sigwficant natural features are on or near the site. No wildlife other than non - native species European starlings were noted on the site during our January 2005 site visit. �1 Eu HC . 116 FEfi ��Ea B s.:w oo �PM - r1 P-endaBLcUaI r EFd IATrTop I Assoc 9724535106 , T -246 P.004 /010 F -763 CendantrA5.108 B-12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 3 Chinook Salmon The National Marine Fisheries Service (NWFS) has identified the Chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus rshawytecha) as a threatened species. NMSF has listed Puget Sound Chinook as threatened since March of 1999. The identified EStJ includes all naturally spawning populations of Chinook from rivers and streams flowing into Puget Sound. Critical habitat includes all marine areas accessible to Chinook salmon in Puget Sound, Chinook salmon are the largest pacific salmon averaging 36" in length and 18 -22 pounds. Chinook salmon spawn in main stem rivers and large streams. Ocean type chino salmon leave the river environment entering the estuarine and marine environments in their first year of life. These fish typically spend most of their adult life in coastal waters and return to their natal rivers in the fall to spawn. According to the King County Fish Distribution maps on Chinook Distribution in WRIA 9 (see attached) Chinook salmon should be observed in Gilliam Creek (pink line on east side of 1 -5 of map below). The site is Iocated to the west of the boxed in number 11 on the map. As can be seen on the map, Chinook salmon do not use the channel on -site. Bull trout There is little information about the abundance and Life history of bull trout in Puget Sound and its tributaries. Bull trout are presumed present in numerous coastal rivers and streams. The Puget Sound coastal bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) was listed as threatened in October of 1999. This listing includes all drainages north of the Columbia River, including tributaries of Puget Sound. Four life stage history strategies are used by, Bull trout, although only the anadromous form would occur in Puget Sound Anadromous bull trout spawn in freshwater and then migrate to salt water for an unknown period of time. Bull trout are known to opportunistically feed on juvenile salmon during downstream migration and will migrate to near shore habitats in salt water and estuaries to prey on juvenile salmon in the spring. FEJFyaBiyv u� ©udPM 3 rrc �lendanii of i l Liroup FiSSUI H0.116 F.5/10 9724696106 • T -246 P.005/010 F -793 Cendant/ #A5 -108 B -12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 4 Bull trout are not known to use this area of Gilliam creek, However, little is known about their distribution in this steam and they may be present in Iower reaches east of I -5. Due to the character of the channel on -site and the fact no fish have even been seen in the on- site channel, it can be said with a high degree of certainty that no bull trout use Gilliam Creek or its tributary channel on -site. Coho salmon Currently this species is not listed as endangered, although they may be in the future. As with Chinook salmon, these species are known to use tributaries of Puget Sound. Adult and juvenile coho probably utilize the lower reaches of Gilliam Creek east of I -5 near the Green River. According to the King County Fish Distribution maps on Chinook Distribution in WRIA 9 (see below) Coho salmon have been observed in the Green River (yellow line on west side of map below). The site is located to the northwest of the boxed in number 80. As can be seen on the map, Coho salmon do not use the channel on -site. Cutthroat trout According to the King County Fish Distribution maps on cutthroat trout Distribution in WRIA 9 (see below), cutthroats are known to utilize the lower reaches of Gilliam Creek to the east of I -S. None are known to use the channel west of I -5 near the site. FE — a z i,,2 V.. u PiA 3: r wMtiendanB l,8 (1 a i roup ^A550C rio.116 F.6.10 6724535106 • T -246 P.006/010 F -793 Cendant/ #A5 -108 B -12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page S Steelhead trout Steelhead, or sea -run rainbow trout are not known to utilize Gilliam Creek. According to the King County Fish Distribution maps on steelhead Distribution in WRIA 9 (see attached), the closest use of a water by steelliead is the Omen River east of I -5. None are known to use Gilliam Creek or the channel on -site. iI) Chum salmon Currently this Species is not listed as endangered, although they may be in the future. As with Chinook salmon, these species are known to use tributaries of Puget Sound. Adult and juvenile chum salmon probably utilize the lower reaches of Gilliam Creek east of I -5 near the Green River. According to the King County Fish Distribution maps on chum salmon .Distribution in WRIA 9 (see attached) Churn salmon have been observed in the Green River (orange line on west side of map below). As can be seen on the map, Chum salmon do not use the channel on -site. FE%- aB,uu9 2iMpm 3 r uM- QndanB �aliaMA roue ASSOC 3.1, 2 Habitat 9724836106 • NO.116 P.7/10 T -246 P.007 /010 F -793 Conde:./ MS-108 B..12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 6 The habitat of the Action area is one of a great disturbance. The small tributary of Gilliam Creek in this area is ditched and culverted and receives untreated and un- detained stormwater. Dense thickets of invasive Himalayan blackberry cover its banks. The site offers no unique, high or even moderate value habitat for any species. 3.1.3 Other Sensitive Areas & Species The east side of the channel contains a small portion of Type 3 riparian wetland, This is far from any proposed work on the site. No state or federally listed threatened or endangered species were observed on or near the site. No state or federally listed threatened or endangered species are known to use the site or areas adjacent to the site. 4.0 Effects of the Action 4.1 Effects Analysis 4.1.1 Construction Disturbance There is no proposed direct construction disturbance within the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) or fish habitat of the tributary of Gilliam Creek is proposed, 4.1.2 Habitat There is no proposed disturbance to habitat in the tributary of Gilliam Creek. All work is proposed in existing disturbed areas far above the top of the bank and OHWM of the FE e-TB`uu9. uOOidPM 3 R2mMendanBi.a4n ai roue ASSOC NO.116 P.8 /1O 9724536106 • t-246 P.008 /010 F-783 Cendant/ #AS -108 B•12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 P ge 7 creek. No removal of riparian vegetation or any vegetation on the site other than weedy species in the areas outside the creek and its buffer are proposed. 4_J.3 Biota No direct or indirect effects to any species are anticipated as all work is outside the creek and the buffer areas. 4.1,4 Net Effects of Action The proposed site plan will have no new impacts or effects to the only semi- natural feature on the site, the small tributary of Gilliam Creek. In fact, the proposed site plan includes the use of a water quality treatment vault for stromwater from portions of the site which will treat and clean water to a higher quality than currently exists. The only possibility of effect is during the construction phase is when it is possible that some untreated runoff could reach the creek if not properly handled with the proposed best management practices, Chinook Salmon — No work is proposed within the habitat for Chinook salmon or surrounding buffer of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on Chinook salmon. Bull Trout - No work is proposed within the habitat for bull trout or the tributary of Gilliam Creek, It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on bull trout. Coho Salmon - No work is proposed within the habitat for coho salmon or surrounding buffer of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on coho salmon. Steelhead Trout - No work is proposed within the habitat for Steelhead trout or surrounding buffer of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on steelhead pout, Cutthroat Trout - No work is proposed within the habitat for cutthroat trout or surrounding buffer of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on cutthroat trout. Chum Salmon -. No work is proposed within the habitat for Chum salmon or surrounding buffer of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. It is our determination that this project will have No Effects on Chum salmon. FED FEB - uu9' 9.2005 3: 3 KurM Lendant L;a*iitaI oun RSSOC NO.116 P.9/10 9724686106 T -246 P.009 /010 F -793 CendanV#AS -108 B -12 Wetland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 8 4.2 Conservation/Mitigation Measures The proposed project will improve water quality of the tributary of Gilliam Creek through the use of a stormwater treatment vault. Currently untreated runoff enters the tributary of Gilliam Creek from the site. The proposed facility and associated storm water treatment will provide a net improvement to water quality and fish habitat along this reach of the tributary of Gilliam Creek. As previously mentioned, best management practices will be used during construction to prevent any impacts to the creek or the creeks associated buffer. If you have any questions or require any additional information please feel free to contact me at (253) 859-0515 or at ed @bl2assoc,com Sincerely, B -12 Wetland Consulting Inc. Ed Sewall Senior Biologist & President FEB. e0 J S ma t MA rTwn ASSOC -up uPM rw-k ndan; . o H0.116 P.10,-1C1 9724595106 T -246 P.01D /D10 IO F -7703 Cendant! #A5 -108 B -12 Weiland Consulting, Inc February 7, 2005 Page 9 5.0 References King County Fish Distribution Maps in Wl2IA 9, May 2000 US Fish and Wildlife Threatened and Endangered Species Website Rodrick E. and R. Mimer, 1991. Management recommendation for Washington's priority habitats and species. Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia, Washington. Simenstad, C. A., K. L. Fresh, and E. 0. Salo. 1982. The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the Iife history of Pacific Salmon: An unappreciated function. In: V. S. Kennedy Estuarine Comparisons Academic Press, New York, NY. Pages 343 -364. USFWS. 1999a. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Threatened Status for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States; Final Rule. Federal Register 64: 58910 - USFWS. 2001. 1992 Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory, Appendix One Puget Sound Stocks. Prepared by Washington Department of Fisheries, Washington Department of Wildlife, and Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes, Olympia, Washington. WDFW. 1998. 1998 Washington Salmonid Stock Inventory, Appendix Bull Trout and Dolly Varden. Prepared by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. WDFW. 2000a. 2000 Washington Salmonid Stock Inventory, Appendix Coastal Cutthroat. Prepared by Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington. WDFW. 2000b. Michael Aippersbach & Associates Planning and Development Services y- January 13, 2005 HAND DELIVERED Brandon Miles Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 -2544 COVER LETTER Re: Cendant Car Rental Project SEPA File # L04 -064 Project Address: 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard RECEWED 1 JAN 13 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Brandon, per your letter of January 3, 2005 regarding the above project (and SEPA file), we are submitting in response to the points raised in your letter the following documents for the City's review. Submittal Items 1. 5 copies of revised drawings (A1.1, A2.2, and Al2.2) 2. 1 copy revised SEPA Checklist & Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist 3. 1 copy of Blunk DeMattei response letter (dated January 12, 2005) 4. 1 copy of cut - sheets for outdoor mechanical equipment 5. 1 copy of SRO letter, re: photo - documentation of murals (dated January 12, 2005) 6. 1 copy of TSI Traffic Study Addendum (dated January 13, 2005) Please note, we have engaged B -12 Associates to prepare letter regarding a review of the proposed stormwater discharge to Gilliam Creek. We were unable to have that document available for the submittal today, but expect to have it in a few days or at least by the end of next week. Also, Blunk DeMattei has previously provided your office with lighting details (item 19 under Section C. Building Elements, Details, and Materials). We trust that this is what is required for our response to your January 3, 2005 letter and look forward to your earliest review for completion of the SEPA Determination. Please let me know if you need any additional copies of any documents. If there are questions or additional requests, you can reach me by phone at 206 -523 -3764, by e-mail at aipp @prodigy.net or by fax at 206 -524 -0337. Thanks, Brandon! Sincerely, 141444t Michael Aippersbac dell/maa proj files /cendant.dsk: sepa submittal cover letter — 01.13.05 PO Box 95429 - Seattle, Washington 98145 - (206) 523- 3764/Fax: (206) 524 -0337 TSI TransportationtSolutions, Inc. 8250 -165th Avenue NE Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052.6628 T 425 -883 -4134 F 425.867.0898 www.tsinw.com Chandler S. Eason III, AIA Vice President Bluck Demattei Associates Architects AIA 1555 Bayshore Highway #300 Burlingame, CA 94010 RECEWED fJAN 13 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT January 12, 2005 Subject: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. /Tukwila -New Car Service Center Site Response to SEPA Lo4-064 Response Letter Dated 12/9/04 Dear Mr. Eason: The following summarizes responses associated with the traffic analysis for the subject project. For clarity we have repeated the comment from the City of Tukwila 12/9/04 followed by a response to the comment. Planning 9. As part of the SEPA review you have submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). It appears that the TIA is using employee counts to determine a traffic count for the site. Does the TIA account for the actual use of the property? For example if the business was a truck terminal the TIA would account for trucks coming and going from the site, not just the employees who work on the site. Cendant Rental Car Group will use the site as a regional facility for maintenance of rental cars. The TIA noted that on average 300 cars would be serviced on the lot per day. Shuttles will be used to ferry drivers off site that will then bring back cars for service. Does the TIA include the shuttle trips and the rental cars coming and going from the site? If the TIA does not include these trips it must be revised to include them. Public Works has additional comments regarding the TIA, which are provided in the Public Works section of this letter. Employees were used as an independent variable and are not intended to only reflect employee related trips but also include van, rental car shuttle and service and delivery trips. By way of explanation, when estimating trip generation for this or any new development, the trips are typically estimated by applying some trip rate (trips per xxx) times the size of the development. The denominator of this fraction (the "xxx ") is called the independent variable. The independent variable takes many forms including building floor area, acreage, beds in a hospital, number of employees at a worksite, number of fueling pumps, or number, of vehicles TSI Transportation!Solutions, Inc. • Chan er S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 2 of 7 passing on the adjacent street to list several examples. In the case of this facility, most of the uses (the administration building being an exception) did not correspond to a traditional land use type found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. Further, the activity program could be most reliably tied to employees rather than service bay, land area or building area. This is because the land is being used in a very unique way (no other typical examples) and the buildings are being retrofitted and do not have the efficiencies typical of a built to suit user. For these reasons employees or drivers appeared to reflect the most reliable basis (independent variable) for estimating trip generation. All estimates incorporated not only the trips associated with the employees traveling to and from work but the operational characteristics associated with that or other employees shuttling cars, traveling in vans, miscellaneous deliveries, and other trips associated with the function of this maintenance and operations facility. As noted in Table 1 on Page 4 of the TIA, an inventory of staffing levels according to their work shift is presented. The text expands further to explain that employees arrive and leave their shifts on a staggered schedule. Cendant's reason for this staggered schedule is to provide an orderly and efficient employee check in, shuttle van distribution of drivers, and allocation of the repair work when employees arrive. A byproduct of this staggered schedule is to reduce the PM.peak hour travel associated with employees. In the case of the car shuttle operations, the trip generation was estimated according to the various activities (commute trips, shuttle trips, van trips and other service and support trips) related to the operations as described on Page 4 of the TIA and then was compared against the most closely comparable trip generation found in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. A summary derivation of the trip generation for the shuttle operations is shown on the following table which takes each activity and estimates the proportion of persons expected to make a trip during the PM Peak hour. This is converted to the number of trips for each activity, totaled, and then converted to a trip rate. In this case the trip rate was computed to be 1.34 trips per driver. To be conservative (ensure that trips were not underestimated, this trip rate was rounded to 1.5 trips per driver when applied to the forecast of trips added to the street network. TSI Transportati TS!, Solutions Inc. Chafer S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 3 of 7 Activity Commute Trips Car Shuttle Trips Van Other Service Trips Employees/Vans % in PM Trips Peak Hr. 55 Drivers 0.55 30.25 55 Drivers 0.4 22.00 8 Vans 0.3 2.4o 54.65 Emp. Trips 0.35 19.13 Total 73.78 Rate (Total 1.34 trips /Drivers) Further, a comparison of the trip generation rates used in the TM to traditional ITE trip generation rates was made. This comparison finds that the trip rates used in the TIA are higher (more conservative) than the traditional trip generation rates found it the ITE Trip Generation Manual. This comparison is summarized in the table below. Use TSI Report Trip Rate (per employee) 0.5 Administration Building Shuttle Operations 1.5 Maintenance Operations o.5 ITE Trip Generation Land Use Trip Rate (per employee) LUC 710 General Office Building LUC 942 Automobile Care Center LUC no Light Industrial. 0.46 1.43 0.42 For a third comparison to check the reasonableness of the trip generation, it was noted that the site is expected to serve an average of 300 cars per day. If each car serviced made one trip in and one trip out each day this would result in 60o trips per day. Considering this facility operates almost 18 -hours per day and the work shifts are graduated over a four hour schedule, the P.M. peak hour volume is expected to be less than 10% of the daily volume. Thus, io% of 600 trips for the cars alone would be 6o trips (600 daily trips x .10 =6o peak hour trips). The trip generation estimate presented in the TIA for this site is 109 trips or almost double that frequency. Accordingly, this suggests again that the P.M. peak hour trip generation estimated in the October 2004 TM has included not only employee trips but also van trips, rental car shuttle trips coming and going to the site, and all other associated delivery and service trips that will be associated with this use. Accordingly, TSI believes the estimate of trip generation is a reasonable and accurate assessment of the actual activity during the P.M. peak hour. If anything, TSI. TransportationSlutions, Inc. Cha er S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 4 of 7 it appears the trip forecast used in the TM may be an over statement of the trip generations which helps insure that volumes have not been underestimated. Public Works Traffic 1. The study uses a horizon year of 2005, per the City's comprehensive plan you must use 2010 as the horizon year. The attached Figure 4 updates the background traffic volume reflecting 2010 as the horizon year. Level of service has been updated to reflect these conditions. This shows the level of service remains LOS C or better at all intersections involving 5 or more trips. As one would expect, the delay increases slightly due to the increase in background traffic volume. upaatea 1 awe 5: level o/ Jervice Jummary Intersection Existing Future Background Future with Project Type 2004 Delay LOS Type 2010 Delay LOS Type 2010 Delay LOS International Boulevard & S i6oth Street S 27.8 C S Right -Only Access & International Boulevard Full-Access & S 16oth Street 31.5 C S 34.4 C U 0.0 A U 0.0 A U 12.7 B U o.o A U o.o A U 10.0 A NOTES: Delay expressed in average seconds per vehicle. S Signalized intersection. U Unsignalized intersection. Level of service calculations are attached. 2. TSI is proposing crediting trips against the new use. However, crediting can only be done if the site was not vacant more than 12 months. The Bowling Alley did not have a business license past 2002 and the City received a letter from Lowes Cineplex noting that their lease for the site was terminated on January 8, 2004. The comparison of trip generation shown in Table 4 was simply to show the relative difference in the preexisting use and the trip generation associated with the proposed Cendant Rental Car Maintenance Facility. The trip generation associated with the Cendant Rental Car Maintenance Facility (without any reduction for prior use —109 trips) was used to assess traffic operations impacts. These 109 trips are reflected in Figures 5 of the TM and updated Figure 6 (attached). Nonetheless, we have Transportation, olutons, Inc. Chafer S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 5 of 7 updated Table 4 as shown below to reflect elimination of the bowling alley. Because the Loews CinePlex has been closed for less that one year from the time the application was deemed complete it was appropriate to include it. Even though the full 109 trips were used to assess traffic impacts, the real net impact is 14 new trips. Again, the analysis has been conservative to be sure impacts are not underestimated. Updated Table 4: Trip Generation Estimate Use Size Units PM Peak Peak Trips Trips Hour Hour Inbound Outbound Trip Rate Trips Existing Multiplex Cinema 7 Screens 13.642 95 57 38 Total 95 57 38 Proposed Administrative Building 35 Employees 0.53 17.5 3 15 Shuttle Operations 55 Drivers 1.54 82.5 45 37 Maintenance Operations 18 Employees 0.55 9 1 8 Total 109 49 6o Net New Trip +14 -4 +22 Generation 1. Not Applicable 2. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7'" Edition 3. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7'" Edition — General Office Buildings 4. Estimated by TSI based on shift times of drivers 5. Estimated by TSI based on a review of shift times and Light Manufacturing uses 3. Does the trip generation rate proposed by TSI include the nature of the shuttle operations? From the description provided, shuttle and van drivers arrive and leave shortly after as they collect vehicles to bring in. Additionally, the shuttle and van drivers likely leave the site to ferry drivers after they have delivered cars to other sites. The TIA should explicitly state if they have considered this unusual nature in their proposed trip generation rate. Please refer to the description on Page 4 of the TIA and the more detailed explanation of the trip generation that responds to the Planning Department question relating to this same item. 4. The City's concurrency ordinance is very specific. Any intersection with five or more new peak hour trips must be analyzed. If the trip credit /trip generation adjustment(s) make a change in the number of new trips in an area that is above this threshold, a LOS analysis will be required. As noted above, there was no credit or deduction taken for prior uses when analyzing the traffic impact associated with the proposed Cendant Rental Car Maintenance Facility. The traffic assignment shows that the TSIf Transportationon-Solutions, Inc. Chandler S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 6 of 7 only other intersection impacted by five or more trips would be the on- ramp to SR -518 immediately north of the site. Since this ramp is served by an exclusive right turn lane that is not controlled by a signal and does not conflict with any other movement at this intersection, there will be no impact at this location. Therefore, no additional intersection analysis beyond that summarized above appears warranted. City of SeaTac 1. The primary access for the Cendant Facility will be from S. i6oth Street. However, historically the primary access to the site was International Blvd. The City of SeaTac has concerns that the access on S. 160th Street could create a safety hazard. The City of SeaTac would like to see left turn pockets installed on S. 160th Street and the intersection of the driveway, S. 160th Street and 34th Ave. South. In lieu of turn pockets the City of SeaTac would consider restricting turn movements to right in and right out. To evaluate the need for a left turn pocket and the associated potential safety hazard, a review of accident records was made. Based on the information provided by the City of SeaTac, there is no indication of a safety issues along the road section in the vicinity of the site entrance on S 160th Street. Accident data was only provided for the major intersections of S 160th Street at International Boulevard and at S 160th Street at Military Road. Other considerations relating to the safety at this site also include: 1) The volume on S 160th Street (a four -lane road) is well below the road capacity; 2) The driveway will operate at LOSA under full operation in 2010; and 3) Cars entering and leaving the site will be driven by Cendant employees, the majority of whom drive vehicles professionally and /or who are very familiar with the site access. The operations on this site will not serve a general public who may not be familiar with site access. Even if a left turn lane could be justified, our review suggests that there are many obstacles to construction of this widening that are outside the control of Cendant Car Rental Group or any private business or property owner. To create a left turn lane, an additional travel lane would need to be added at the site access. Because of limitations on the south side of the street, such widening would require shifting the road to the north. This new lane and associated frontag e improvements would require up to 9.5 feet of right of way on the adjacent Dollar Car Rental site and some additional right of way on the SuttlePark2 site. This property is not TSI Transportati�Soiutions, Inc. Cher S. Eason III, AIA January 12, 2005 Page 7 of 7 within the control of Cendant Car Rental Group nor is likely that they could purchase this property. Since a private party can not condemn other private property, it will likely require the City of SeaTac to condemn the additional right of way assuming the left turn lane can be justified. Even if the property were available the design of this section of road will need to be very carefully developed to recognize the multiple driveways along this section of road, some of which appear to generate greater left turn volumes than the Cendant Maintenance Facility. Accordingly, we believe a left turn lane is not warranted by the construction and operation of the Cendant Maintenance Facility traffic nor is construction currently feasible. The applicant will agree to participate in discussions with the City of SeaTac to develop a logical long term channelization plan for S i6oth Street and participate in their fair share of the agreed -upon construction and implementation costs, if left turn lane at the site access is found to be warranted. I trust this provides you and the Cities of Tukwila and SeaTac with a cleat understanding of the approach and methodology used to assess impacts and evaluate any associated mitigation. If you or they have any questions, we would be happy to review this with you further. Sincerely, David D. Markley, PE Principal Attachments January 12, 2005 Mr. Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City Of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 RECEOvE® iJAN 13 1005 Zmmunnry eLopmegr Re: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc./Tukwila - New Car Service Center Site Response to SEPA L04 -064 response letter dated 12/9/04 Dear Mr. Miles: 61 BLUNK DEMATTE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AIA Thank you for your 12/9/04 letter and the City of Tukwila's review comments based on our SEPA and DRB package. Please note that this site will be used for a car maintenance and storage site, not a public rental car site. This site is primarily used by the experienced Cendant staff to service and maintain their rental car vehicles to return them to their rental car fleet. These rental cars will be rented at the SeaTac International Airport rental car facility, not at this site. This site may have occasional visitors and vendors to the buildings, but the general public will not be using this site. Since this is a secured rental car site, we will not allow pedestrian access through the site, other than Cendant's trained and experienced employees. Cendant Car Rental Group's (Cendant) responses to your comments in your 12/9/04 letter are as follows (your comments are in normal face and Cendant's responses are italicized after your comments): Planning 1. Clarify question B 3 (b) (2) to note what will happen to the water from the car washing operation on the site. This water must be directed to the sanitary sewer and cannot be collected via the stormwater system. Cendant will use a NS car wash that will have a "85% reclaim water" system. The car wash water will be filtered and then used again and again. Any car wash water that is used at the car wash prewash area, under the canopy at the north side of the car wash tunnel, will drain to the catch basin, which will drain back to the car wash water system. Likewise the car wash exit side's water, under the canopy at the south side of the car wash tunnel, will drain back to the catch basin, which is connected to the car wash water system. Any car wash water that is not reused but discharged from this system will be delivered to the oil /water separator and then to the sanitary sewer. See civil drawing C06 dated 11/17/04 as attached for location of the car wash cleanout and oil /water separator. The car wash shop drawings are attached to our QTA (Quick Turnaround) permit application package D04 -447. ® 1555 BAYSHORE HWY #300 BURLINGAME CA 94010 TEL (650) 692-9911 FAX (650) 692 -0181 IM Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Two of Seven 1. In question B 3 (d) its notes that a water quality system will be utilized on the site. Will it be done through the use of underground facilities of an above ground detention pond? Clarify how water quality will be accomplished and show the facility on the site map. A new water quality system for the new parking lot area, north of the remodeled administration building where the existing theaters are removed, will have an underground stormfilter vault as shown on attached civil plans C04 and C09 dated 11/17/04. Water quality will be accomplished by use of stormfilter cartridges with filter media. Also see civil sheet CO2 for temporary erosion control during construction of this project. This vault is now shown on attached revised architectural site plan A1.1 dated 1/7/04. 2. Question B 5 (b) needs to be updated. Chinook Salmon are present within the lower basin of Gilliam Creek (See Public Works Comments). Question B 5 (b) is revised as requested. See B -12 Wetlands Consulting, Inc.'s Biological Assessment/Evaluation. 3. Question B 5 (d) should include the water quality that will be provided for the stormwater system. Question B 5 (d) is revised as requested. See response to item 1 above for water quality information. 4. Question B 6 (c) needs to include reference to compliance with the State of Washington's Energy Code requirements. Question B 6 (c) is revised as requested. Project will comply with the State of Washington's Energy requirements. 5. Question B 7 (a) needs to note the presence of the above ground fuel tank. Question B 7 (a) is revised as requested. The above ground fuel tank is also shown on sheet A1.1. 6. Please provide information in Question B 7 (a) (2) regarding proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards (e.g. gas storage tank). .7\r) in professional environmental consultant, Geomatrix, is preparing a SPCC plan in accordance with Federal guidelines and applicable State and Local regulations for this site to address the potential oil, gas and hazardous spills. This plan will be on file at the site before any bulk petroleum products are delivered to the site. 1 • Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Three of Seven 7. After reviewing question B 7, please provide data sheets which note the sound decibels for all outdoor mechanical equipment (i.e. HVAC, generators, etc.). Note that a noise study may be required if it appears that noise from the site will significantly impact adjacent properties. Chinn Construction is the general contractor for Cendant and is completing the HVAC work for this project with a design -build subcontractor. Attached are the data sheets for the planned HVAC units as requested. There are no emergency generators provided by Cendant or Chinn Construction for this project. HVAC unit locations are as shown on A2.2 and Al2.2 as attached and on our permit application D05 -012. Please note that the existing bowling alley and theater have operated at the site for a number of years with air conditioning units. The new air conditioning units for the Cendant offices and maintenance operations are likely quieter and actually serve less floor area than the bowling alley and theater. However, should noise become an issue after construction, Cendant would provide the City with a noise level study for their review. Question A 12 notes that the site lies within an environmentally sensitive area, however this statement is contradicting question B 8 (h). Question B 8 (h) is revised to note that a portion of the existing landscaped area north east of the paved car storage area and the QTA (Quick Turnaround Building — car wash and fuel islands) is located in an "environmentally sensitive area ". 9. As part of the SEPA review you have submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). It appears that the TIA is using employee counts to determine a traffic count for the site. Does the TIA account for the actual use of the property? For example if the business was a truck terminal the TIA would account for trucks coming and going from the site, not just the employees who work on the site. Cendant will use the site as a regional facility for maintenance of rental cars. The TIA noted that on average 300 cars would be serviced on the lot per day. Shuttles will be used to ferry drivers off site who will then bring back cars for service. Does the TIA include the shuttle trips and the rental cars coming and going from the site? If the TIA does not include these trips it must be revised to include them. Public Works has additional comments regarding the TIA, which are provided in the Public Works section of this letter. Transportation Solutions, Inc.'s revised traffic study addendum is attached. This study has been revised to address your comments. 10. The checklist makes no mention of required frontage improvements along S. 160th Street. Please note that under TMC 11.12.030 (A) frontage improvements along S 160th Street are required. Street frontage improvements as requested will be provided. Please forward street frontage improvement requirements. Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Four of Seven 11. The Lewis and Clark Theater and Bowling Alley site has been identified as culturally important for South King County. The proposed work will remove the murals and paintings within the buildings. The existing theater will be demolished and thus the paintings within this area of the building could not be incorporated into the new building. However, the existing building where the bowling alley was previously located will remain. Within this building is a large mural, please explain the need to remove the mural. Can the mural be incorporated into the interior design of the building? If the mural can not be incorporated into the interior design, is it possible to use construction techniques that allow it to be concealed so that it is not destroyed? At a minimum a qualified professional must document all the murals and paintings within the buildings in photographic and written form following the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) recordation guidelines and format. Please note that the theaters, where murals /paintings occur, are being demolished for the new car parking lot. These murals/paintings are finished on the exterior concrete /CMU walls or interior gypsum board drywall and shall be required to be completely removed for installation of the planned car parking lot. These murals cannot be saved in place or removed and relocated. The murals in the existing bowling alley will also be demolished to provide adequate access and operations of this planned car maintenance facility. These murals are approximately +/ -7' -0" above the bowling alley's finished floor and do not allow the required car maintenance facility to operate with the required car entry, exit and maintenance operations planned for this remodeled building. These murals were completed on gypsum board drywall and cannot be saved in place or removed and relocated. As requested, Sterling Realty Organization (SRO) will provide to the City of Tukwila a photographic documentation using a qualified photographer following the recordation guidelines and format prior to the issuance of a Demolition permit. See attached SRO letter. Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Five of Seven Public Works Development Review 1. Please update the ESA checklist and SEPA checklist as noted on the provided copies. Updated ESA and SEPA checklists attached are revised as noted in your 12/15/04 facsimile. Traffic 1. The study uses a horizon year of 2005, per the City's comprehensive plan you must use 2010 as the horizon year. 2. TSI is proposing crediting trips against the new use. However, crediting can only be done if the site was not vacant more than 12 months. The Bowling Alley did not have a business license past 2002 and the City received a letter from Lowes Cineplex noting that their lease for the site was terminated on January 8, 2004. 3. Does the trip generation rate proposed by TSI include the nature of the shuttle operations? From the description provided, shuttle and van drivers arrive and leave shortly after as they collect vehicles to bring in. Additionally, the shuttle and van drivers likely leave the site to ferry drivers after they have delivered cars to other sites. The TIA should explicitly state if they have considered this unusual nature in their proposed trip generation rate. 4. The City's concurrency ordinance is very specific. Any intersection with five or more new peak hour trips must be analyzed. If the trip credit/trip generation adjustment(s) make a change in the number of new trips in an area that is above this threshold, a LOS analysis will be required. Transportation Solutions, Inc.'s revised traffic study addendum is attached. This study has been revised to address your comments. Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Six of Seven City of Seatac As you are aware the public right of way located adjacent to the site is within the jurisdiction of the City of Seatac. The City of Seatac has provided the following comments: 1. The primary access for the Cendant Facility will be from S. 160th Street. However, historically the primary access to the site was International Blvd. The City of Seatac has concerns that the access on S. 160th Street could create a safety hazard. The City of Seatac would like to see left turn pockets installed on S 160th Street and the intersection of the driveway, S. 160th Street and 34th Ave. South. In lieu of turn pockets the City of Seatac would consider restricting turn movements to right in and right out. The City of Tukwila will require that the TIA be updated to address safety concerns on S. 160th Street. Left turn pockets as requested will not be provided. See Transportation Solutions, Inc.'s revised traffic study addendum as attached. This study has been revised to address your comments and shows that left turn pockets are not required by this project. 2. Install full frontage improvements along the properties frontage with S. 160th Street to consist of but not limited to sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street paving, water mains, drainage facilities, sanitary sewers, all improvements required by any applicable ordinance and all necessary appurtenances. Such off -site improvements (except traffic signalization systems) shall extend the full distance of the real property to be improved upon and which adjoins property dedicated as a public street. (The underlined info is from language in the Seatac Municipal Code with references to signalization deleted). Please see attached frontage improvement detail attached for your information. Please all note that TMC 11.12.030 requires the installation of frontage improvements for the proposed project. Street improvements as requested will be provided. 3. The connection to S. 160th Street is to be reconstructed as a driveway cut through a sidewalk per WSDOT /APWA Standard Plan #F -4. New driveway curb cut will be installed per WSDOT /APWA Standard Plan #F -4 as requested. • • Mr. Brandon Miles January 12, 2005 Page Seven of Seven We believe that this above information, our attached revised SEPA document and five sets of revised drawings enclosed appropriately address all of the City of Tukwila's comments in your 12/9/04 letter and 12/15/04 facsimile of handwritten comments. Please advise immediately if you require any additional information or modifications or clarifications to our SEPA package. We look forward to completing this project with the City of Tukwila. Very truly yours, Chandler S. Eason III AIA Vice President cc: Karl Westerman, Cendant Michael Lancaster, SRO Michael Aippersbach Lou Larsen, Pacific Engineering Design, LLC. Glen Takagi Bruce Newman, TS! Kevin Chinn, Chinn Construction Encl. Revised SEPA Environmental Review document dated 1/12/05 Revised SEPA application plans: Architectural plans A1.1, A2.2 and Al2.2 dated 1/7/05 Civil plans CO2, C04, C06 and C09 dated 11/17/04 SRO's letter of mural photo- documentation Transportation Solutions, Inc.'s revised traffic study B -12 Wetlands Consulting, Inc.'s Biological Assessment/Evaluation dated 1/ - -/05 HVAC cut sheets from Chinn Construction i STERLING REALTY ORGANIZATION Michael Lancaster, C5M Property /Construction Manager (425) 455 -8151 mikel@sterlingrealty.com January 12, 2005 Mr. Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 RECEIV 0 'JAN 13 2005 DEVELOPN ask a RE: Photo Documentation / Lewis & Clark Bowl and Theatre Building Dear Mr. Miles: Sterling Realty Organization is currently securing bids from qualified photographers to document all of the murals and paintings within the buildings in photographic form. I trust this photo- documentation process will satisfy your concerns, and help us achieve approvals for our construction permits. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (425) 455 -8151. Sincerely, Michael Lancaster, CSM Property/Construction Manager MUps 600 106th Ave. N.E., Bellevue, WA, Suite 200 • Mail to: P.O. Box 91723, Bellevue, WA 98009 -1723 (425) 455 -8100 • Fax (425) 455 -8165 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 13, 2004 Mr. Dixie Hallenberger City of Seatac Public Works 4800 S. 188th Street Seatac, WA 98188 -8605 RE: Cendant Car Group Application, L04 -064 and E04 -018 Dear Mr. Hallenberger: Thank you for providing comments for the above mentioned land use applications. Your comments have been incorporated into the City's SEPA review of the project. In the near future the City of Tukwila will be sending you a revised SEPA application, TIA, and plans for the proposed project. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles ' ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, rattsidn J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. Files (L04 -064 and E04 -018) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 AV /S. CENDANT1111 Car Rental Group Karl S. Westermann Regional Director South Central Area Corporate Facilities December 13, 2004 RECEIVED DEC 14 2004 Mr. Brandon Miles COMMUNITY Assistant Planner DEVELOPMENT Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 -2544 Re: Approvals /Permits for Cendant Car Rental Project — Lewis & Clark Site Dear Mr. Miles: As the Regional Director, Corporate Facilities for the Cendant Car Rental Group and the "Permit Coordinator ", I hereby authorize Michael Aippersbach & Associates to act as our local agent regarding all the associated approvals and permits for our proposed Cendant Car Rental Group project at the Lewis & Clark site. We have authorized him to monitor the SEPA & Design Review process, provide whatever assistance is needed with our application, and continue to coordinate with our office and the architect's office. We, of course, will still continue to be the party of record desiring copies of all applicable notices and reports sent to my office. We feel the local presence and expertise of Michael Aippersbach & Associates acting as agent will benefit all parties in moving the process forward smoothly. Sincerely, Cc: Micheal Aippersbach Chandler Eason Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. P.O. Box 612707 • 3937 South 26th Street • Dallas, Texas 75261 Tel: (972) 453 -4062 • Fax: (972) 453 -5103 • E -mail: karl.westermann @cendant.com Bu�dq�t. • City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 9, 2004 Mr. Karl Westermann Cendant Car Rental Group PO Box 612707 DFW Airport, TX 75261 RE: SEPA L04 -064, Cendant Car Rental Facility Dear Mr. Westermann: The City received your SEPA application on September 27, 2004. The City deemed the application incomplete on October 12, 2004. After additional information was submitted the application was deemed completed on November 2, 2004, for the necessary material to start the City's review of the application. The application is for the conversion of the existing Lewis and Clark Recreation Facility into a Cendant Car Facility The below comments are in regards to SEPA only and a comment letter regarding Design Review will be following this letter. The SEPA application has been routed to other City Departments and other agencies for their review. The City has the following comments: Planning 1. Clarify question B 3 (b) (2) to note what will happen to the water from the car washing operation on the site. This water must be directed to the sanitary sewer and cannot be collected via the stormwater system. 1. In question B 3 (d) its notes that a water quality system will be utilized on the site. Will it be done through the use of underground facilities of an above ground detention pond? Clarify how water quality will be accomplished and show the facility on the site map. 2. Question B 5 (b) needs to be updated. Chinook Salmon are present within the lower basin of Gilliam Creek (See Public Works Comments). 3. Question B 5 (d) should include the water quality that will be provided for the stormwater system. 4. Question B 6 (c) needs to include reference to compliance with the State of Washington's Energy Code requirements. 5. Question B 7 (a) needs to note the presence of the above ground fuel tank. 6. Please provide information in question B 7 (a) (2) regarding proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards (e.g. gas storage tank). 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • 7. After reviewing question B 7, please provide data sheets which note the sound decibels for all outdoor mechanical equipment (i.e. HVAC, generators, etc). Note that a noise study may be required if it appears that noise from the site will significantly impact adjacent properties. 8. Question A 12 notes that the site lies within an environmentally sensitive area, however this statement is contradicting question B 8 (h). 9. As part of SEPA review you have submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). It appears that the TIA is using employee counts to determine a traffic count for the site. Does the TIA account for the actual use of the property? For example if the business was a truck terminal the TIA would account for trucks coming and going from the site, not just the employees who work on the site. Cendant will use the site as a regional facility for maintenance of rental cars. The TIA noted that on average 300 cars would be serviced on the lot per day. Shuttles will be used to ferry drivers off site who will then bring back cars for service. Does the TIA include the shuttle trips and the rental cars coming and going from the site? If the TIA does not include these trips it must be revised to include them. Public Works has additional comments regarding the TIA, which are provided in the Public Works section of this letter. 10. The checklist makes no mention of required frontage improvements along S. 160th Street. Please note that under TMC 11.12.030 (A) frontage improvements along S. 160th Street are required. 11. The Lewis and Clark Theater and Bowling Alley site has been identified as culturally important for South King County. The proposed work will remove the murals and paintings within the buildings. The existing theater will be demolished and thus the paintings within this area of the building could not be incorporated into the new building. However, the existing building where the bowling alley was previously located will remain. Within this building is a large mural, please explain the need to remove the mural. Can the mural be incorporated into the interior design of the building? If the mural can not be incorporated into the interior design, is it possible to use construction techniques that allow it to be concealed so that it is not destroyed? At a minimum a qualified professional must document all of the murals and paintings within the buildings in photographic and written form following the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) recordation guidelines and format. Public Works Development Review 1. Please update the ESA checklist and SEPA checklist as noted on the provided copies. Traffic 1. The study uses a horizon year of 2005, per the City's comprehensive plan you must use 2010 as the horizon year. 2 • • 2. TSI is proposing crediting trips against the new use. However, crediting can only be done if the site was not vacant for more than 12 months. The Bowling Alley did not have a business license past 2002 and the City received a letter from Loews Cineplex noting that their lease for the site was terminated on January-8, 2004. 3. Does the trip generation rate proposed by TSI include the nature of the shuttle operations? From the description provided, shuttle and van drivers arrive and leave shortly after as they collect vehicles to bring in. Additionally, the shuttle and van drivers likely leave the site to ferry drivers after they have delivered cars to other sites. The TIA should explicitly state if they have considered this unusual nature in their proposed trip generation rate. 4. The City's concurrency ordinance is very specific. Any intersection with five or more new peak hour trips must be analyzed. If the trip credit/trip generation adjustment(s) make a change in the number of new trips in an area that is above this threshold, a LOS analysis will be required. City of Seatac As you are aware the public right of way located adjacent to the site is within the jurisdiction of the City of Seatac. The City of Seatac has provided the following comments: 1. The primary access for the Cendant Facility will be from S. 160th Street. However, historically the primary access to the site was International Blvd. The City of Seatac has concerns that the access on S. 160th Street could create a safety hazard. The City of Seatac would like to see left turn pockets installed on S. 160th Street and the intersection of the driveway, S. 160` Street and 34th Ave South. In lieu of turn pockets the City of Seatac would consider restricting turn movements to right in and right out. The City of Tukwila will require that the TIA be updated to address safety concerns on S. 160th Street. 2. Install full frontage improvements along the properties frontage with S. 160th Street to consist of but not limited to sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street paving, water mains, drainage facilities, sanitary sewers, all improvements required by any applicable ordinance and all necessary appurtenances. Such off-site improvements (except traffic signalization systems) shall extend the full distance of the real property to be improved upon and which adjoins property dedicated as a public street. (The underlined info is from language in the Seatac Municipal Code with references to signalization deleted). Please see attached frontage improvement detail attached for your information. Please also note that TMC 11.12.030 requires the installation of frontage improvements for the proposed project. 3. The connection to S. 160th Street is to be reconstructed as a driveway cut through a sidewalk per WSDOT /APWA Standard Plan # F -4. 3 • • Please update the checklist to include these comments. Next Step The above comments are in reference to only the SEPA application. The City is also reviewing the design review application for the project.. The City must issue the threshold determination prior to the design review hearing. You have two options with regards to resubmitting: 1. Address the above comments and resubmit for SEPA only. or, 2. Wait until the City has issued its comments with regards to the pending Design Review application and then resubmit for both applications. Currently there are development permits pending on the site. In order for the demolition permit to be issued, the SEPA threshold determination must be issued. Design review must be completed prior to any exterior work occurring on the site. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmilesna ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, i j Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. File (E04 -018) 4 Brandon Miles - Re: Lewis and Clark From: Barbara Saxton To: Brandon Miles Date: 12/7/04 4:07PM Subject: Re: Lewis and Clark Lewis & Clark Theater 15820 TIB Did renew and get a 2004 license. Corporate sent us a letter in early 2004 saying their lease was terminated as of 1 -8 -04, and to cancel their license. They said SRO would be the new contact. AMF Lewis & Clark Bowl 15830 TIB Had a license in 2001, but did not renew for 2002. »> Brandon Miles 12/07/04 03:28PM »> Barbara, When was the last year that the theater and the bowling alley had a valid bus lic? Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us Page 1 LOEWS CINEPLEX E N T E R T A I N M E N T LOEWS THEATRES CINEPLEX ODEON MAGIC JOHNSON THEATRES STAR THEATRES 711 Firm I AVENUE NiwV YORK, NY 10022 Ir:IEIM IONE 646.521.6000 .07 ;k V11 i k vir Pi_i Tr 'Tti alfrgeS, c/o Loews Cineplex -U.S. 711 5th Avenue, _6:th Floor New York, N.Y. 10022 M 4Yc-in q, Z h:;)-( f Ceater i ukliwdc 1 WA Ni A fn C1�y Cicrk'S of—i -. .4011r /7 BE: 00 of Gus►ncss This Le4S 'o,1 C;■cricx Nevi% - C1/1lI ' CLARK-Di EATt F 1s $i i Kv"),A4. Yvi -}/. i i'Takw��C,VvAryi�� Sir or Madam: By this notice we are informing you that PL''rr no longer operates the above-captioned .p etnises. The lease once held by our company was terminated on I I OF' /2 cab Future correspondence for a& 8 2_6 u kw'+ A • 19141 should be directed to the Current er • SIE.IALIN4 REALTY Og C=fN12.4T1 ii 600 10 (21) Avc. n/ E. Su1fG 20(.. M%Z(Lc,cl Lo.nr &cstr eilcv e i WA- 9&- ©o y (� Li, 5S - ac� _P LiTr T�� e%-1-12e5 Z)G doing business as 1-rali I.S g. C4 itK i em will no longer be responsible for this premises and Permit. Please remove the names PLI1T rl-' 'yntc and 7j1 5 A��b" Fir NY NY!OL from your records for this location. r14 I so rrv,� o w- (2.5 i cy,a I ' c� o,— I1 y2 t A Ur ■rvg zr A MAN 1°kvv y ; L./nnvrvoct' —�- rL,,, i• r 1 CSC , will not be responsible for any other theatres except its own. Si? ed, Wian ormane � Asst, Director Operations /CODE COMPLIANCE PUT ,. • do LOEWS CINEPLEX Bif. 711 AVENUE Q b',w °.'•: -eth FLOOR Y" }w lq R22 A LOEWS CINEPLEX EN TIiRIAINNIIiN -I CO\IIANY City of Tuk , a, Washington RUMNESS FLAMM-F 206 244 -2913 Theatre TELEPHONE NATURE OF BUSINESS LICENSEE AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY ORDI- NANCES AND STATE LAWS APPLICABLE TO THE BUSINESS ACTIVITY LICENSED HEREUNDER. Lewis & Clark Theatre 15820 TUKWILA INTL BLVD TUKWILA WA 98188 -2698 rL EXPIRATK LP E) ' V (--- 12 -31 -2004 DATE ISSUED 02/28/2004 LICENSE NUMBER 04 -817 FEE PAID $100.00 SALES TAX CODE No.1729 CITY CLERK This license is to be displays location of business and is not transferable or assignable. It Please note 1. It is necessary to contact the City Clerk's Office at 206 - 433 -1800 in the event your the following business: guidelines In • Moves within the city limits of Tukwila the operation of • Moves outside the city limits your business: • Ceases operation • Changes ownership • Changes use or type of operation • Will be having a special event (such as a tent sale, parking lot sale or any other event) outside its routine operation. 2. Additional licenses are required if your business has live music /entertainment, tow trucks, amusement devices, solicitors /peddlers, or adult entertainment. 3. Any retail sales tax generated in Tukwila needs to be reported to the Washington State Department of Revenue, under sales tax code # 1729. 4. Tukwila business license renewals are mailed to all licensed businesses in December and payable without penalty until January 31. D A Of VJ V5 in esS Effecive 110412-004 • MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner eO FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, D�lopment Engineer DATE: December 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility 15820 Tukwila International Blvd. SEPA and Design Review Comments SEPA — E04 -018 and Design Review - L04 -064 Cyndy Knighton, Senior Transportation Engineer, has provided the following review comments, regarding the Traffic Impact Assessment by Transportation Solutions, Inc., dated October, 2004. These comments shall be addressed prior to approval of SEPA and Design Review, for this project. Dave, I am reviewing this document you gave me on Nov. 9th. I'm not done as I need to check some stuff they've submitted against our model output, which I don't have right now. I'll get that last comment to you as soon as i can but meanwhile I do have some other comments. They are using a horizon year of 2005. Per our comp plan they must use 2010 as the horizon year. TSI is proposing crediting trips against the new use. This is fine except that I have never granted trip credit for a use if it has been vacant more than 12 months. Their TIA said the buildings had been vacant between 6 -12 months. They must subtract out the trips associated with the building that has been vacant for a year but I'll allow the 6 months. Does the trip generation rate proposed by TSI include the nature of the Shuttle Operations? From the description of how these employees are utilized, I assume that the shuttle drivers and van drivers arrive, and are likely to turn around and leave shortly after as they collect vehicles to bring in. The reverse is probably true that many cars are being delivered with the van driver also leaving to pick up the shuttle driver. The TIA should explicitly state if they have considered this unusual nature in their proposed trip generation rate. Our concurrency ordinance is very specific. Any intersection with 5 or more new peak hour trips must be analyzed. If the trip credit /trip generation adjustment(s) make a change in the number of new trips in any area that is above this threshold, a LOS analysis will be required. I also don't believe that this portion of SR 99 is called TUKWILA International Boulevard but simply International Boulevard. MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING DEPT. — Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner O FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — David McPherson, Development Engineer DATE: November 16, 2004 SUBJECT: Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility 15820 Tukwila International Blvd. SEPA and Design Review Comments SEPA — E04 -018 SEPA is complete for Public Works, if the following comments are addressed: 1. Revise the "Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist" (or) place the redlined checklist in the SEPA file — see enclosed. 2. Revise the "State Environmental Checklist" (or) place the redlined checklist in the SEPA file — see enclosed. 3. Cyndy Knighton, Senior Transportation Engineer, needs to provide review comments, regarding the Traffic Impact Assessment by Transportation Solutions, Inc., dated October, 2004. Design Review - L04 -064 Design Review is complete for Public Works, if the following comments are addressed: 1. Cyndy Knighton, Senior Transportation Engineer, needs to provide review comments, regarding the Traffic Impact Assessment by Transportation Solutions, Inc., dated October, 2004. City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION November 2, 2004 Mr. Karl Westermann Cendant Car Rental Group PO Box 612707 DFW Airport, TX 75261 Re: Notice of complete application; L04 -064 and E04 -018 Dear Mr. Westermann: The Department of Community Development received your application for Design Review and SEPA review for the property located at 15820 Tukwila International Blvd. The application was deemed incomplete on October 12, 2004. The materials requested by the City were submitted on October 27, 2004. Based on a review of your application for submittal requirements for a sign permit and design review, your application is deemed complete as of November 2, 2004. A notice of land use application will be distributed within 14 days of this date. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is also available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, you can contact me at (206) 431 -3684 or by email at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Bra on J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. File (L04 -064 and E04 -018) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 27, 2004 Mr. Karl Westermann Cendant Car Rental Group PO Box 612707 DFW Airport, TX 75261 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Dear Mr. Westermann: On October 12, 2004, Planning staff sent you a Notice of Incomplete Application. Planning staff sent the letter to the address provided in the application material and on October 26, 2004 the letter was returned by the Post Office noting that the address was not correct. This letter is to inform you that the application for Design Review and SEPA Review for the Cendant Car Rental Facility, located at 15820 TIB was deemed incomplete as of October 12, 2004. The following item(s) need to be submitted in order for the City to review the applications: 1. A Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer must be provided to the City. Once the above item is submitted to the City, staff can begin to review the application. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles(ci.tukwi la.wa.us. Bra don J. Miles Assistant Planner cc. (L04 -064 and E04 -018) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Brandon Miles - RE: Address • From: "Westermann, Karl" <Karl.Westermann @Cendant.com> To: "'Brandon Miles "' <bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 10/26/04 3:56PM Subject: RE: Address Cendant Car Rental Group, PO Box 612707, DFW Airport, TX 75261 For overnight only: 3937 S 26th Avenue, DFW Airport, TX 75261 Original Message From: Brandon Miles [ mailto:bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:42 PM To: Westermann, Karl Cc: ceason3 @bdaarch.com; Nora Gierloff; aipp @prodigy.net Subject: Address Karl, I sent the Notice of Incomplete Application to you on October 12, 2004. Today the letter was back from the Post Office as undeliverable. As you are listed on the application as the Development Coordinator all letters from the City will go to you. I need a valid address in order to ensure that letters from the City are reaching you. Thanks, Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us CC: <ceason3 @bdaarch.com >, Nora Gierloff <ngierloff@ci.tukwila.wa.us >, <aipp @prodigy.net> Page 1 • city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 19, 2004 Mr. Karl Westerman Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc 3837 S. 26th St. DFW Airport Dallas, TX 75621 RE: Design Review and SEPA Review Cendant Car Facility 15820 Tukwila International Blvd Dear Mr. Westerman: As of today the City of Tukwila has not received the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the Cendant Car Facility located at 15820 Tukwila International Blvd. The need for a TIA was noted by City staff at the August 12, 2004 pre - application meeting. When City staff met with you and your representatives on September 8, 2004, staff noted that in order to take this matter to the December 9, 2004 Design Review Hearing a complete application must be submitted to the Department of Community Development by October 1, 2004. The TIA is a required submittal for the project and has not been submitted. As the application is still incomplete, staff is unable to complete a review of the applications. Additionally, staff cannot send out the required Notice of Application with the mandatory 14 -day comment period. As a complete application has not been submitted to the City, your application will not be scheduled for December 9, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. Once the TIA is submitted to the City, staff will inform you of when this matter can go before the Planning Commission. If you have any questions, please call (206) 431 -3684 or send an email to bmiles u,ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, Brandon f Mil Assistant Planner cc. File (E04 -018, L04 -064) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 [Brandon Miles - Re: SEPA Page 1 From: Brandon Miles To: Chandler Eason Date: 10/12/04 2:38PM Subject: Re: SEPA Karl got back to me yesterday and he is still working on the report. I have routed the application to PW, Fire, Building and Parks. However, PW is going to want the TIA. Additionally, I cannot start the Notice of Application without the TIA due to the fact that I need to send the TIA to Seatac PW Department and get their input on the project. I am going to send out a Notice of Incomplete Application. I will continue to review the Design Review Application, but since the SEPA application is incomplete and SEPA is required for design review the design review application is also incomplete. I need to the TIA ASAP to meet the December meeting schedule. Thanks, Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us »> Chandler Eason <ceason3 @bdaarch.com> 10/12/04 10:55AM »> Cendant is checking on the status of this report. We will advise when information is available and when report will be delivered to your attention. Any thoughts on perspective angle per my 9/29/04 email? Thank you. Chandler Brandon Miles wrote: >Chandler, >In the SEPA application you refer to a TIA prepared by Transportation Solutions, Inc. However, I don't have the TIA report. Is it going to be submitted? >Brandon J. Miles >Assistant Planner >Department of Community Development >City of Tukwila >tel (206) 431 -3684 >fax (206) 431 -3665 >bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us Brandon Miles - Re: SEPA Page 2 Chandler S. Eason Ill, AIA Vice President Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy. #300 Burlingame, CA 94010 P (650) 692 -9911 F (650) 692 -0181 C (650) 678 -1554 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. CC: Gierloff, Nora; Michael Aippersbach Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director October 12, 2004 Karl Westerman Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 3837 s. 26th St. DFW Airport Dallas, TX 75621 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Design Review for Cendant Car Facility L04 -064 Dear Mr. W c oil The Cityof Tukwila's_PlanriingDepartment received your application for Design Review and SEPA review for Cendant Car Facility at 15820 Tukwila International Blvd. The following item(s).need:to =be submitted for the City do review the applications: 1. A Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by a Washington State Licensed Engineer needs to be provided to the City. Please provide four copies of the document. The above item is crucial 'and needs to be submitted as soon as possible in order to get on the December schedule for design review approval. Once the above - mentioned information is provided; City staff can begin -to review ..the application. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (206) 431 -3684 or you can email me at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, 'n Ira on J. Mile Assistant Planner- cc. - File(_L04- 064_and':EQ4 -018) .: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Cg ry Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Co .: munity Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMO TO: Development Review Staff FROM: Brandon J. Miles, Assistant Planner RE: Cendant Car Facility, 15820 TIB DATE: October 11, 2004 Attached you will find application material for the conversion of the Lewis and Clark Recreational Facility into a Cendant Facility. The proposal calls for the demolition of the existing theater, construction of a Quick Turn Around Facility, conversion of the existing bowling alley into an administrative office, installation of a perimeter fence, and construction of security booths. The historical murals within the bowling alley will not be retained with this project. Comments are due November 1, 2004 Thanks! 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 This certificate provides the Departme • of Planning and Community Developr� with information necessary to evaluate 8evelopment proposals. City of SeaTadDlanning Dept. 4800 South 18 treet SeaTac, WA 98 8 CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY File No. PART A: (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) RECEIVED (:ITY OF TI WWII A SEP 2 9 2004 �,n /A PERMIT CENTER 1. Owner Name /Address/Phone: (� C� ghf l ek.r. /eel? /D/1 U/Ol (7K0 4/16-: 337 S, a lv ' ST DPW i2-,, o /-1--i DA 1/4S TX 75a6/ / (416S fit° r 1 a,1 Agent or Contact Person/Name/Phone: PA U 7G //1 i r 1 eep% nes i o � 144'0 L/A✓o AV' FA/7-77"..) W/4- 1 LDU L,41 Scn/) Lfa5- (—,$)ffI Site Address (Attach map and legal description); /5? O Rf Gf P /C. /4 i U H WA Y S. To K iAi/ L-11 ) cx/A 2. This certificate is submitted as part of an application for: Residential Building Permit Preliminary Plat Short Subdivision VCommercial/Industrial Bldg. Permit Rezone Other: 3. Estimated number of service connections and meter size s): tar /!O4 (w' 141 Setr`Ces /'leek- 3 • W ;// vt►'lrz. �� Se.Yl4 Cea/ 4. Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the rear of the furthest structure: fl. nlcdcrs alKa a 5. Minimum needs of development for fire flows: rn at a residual pressure of 20 psi. '�i e S r P gP P Source of minimum flow requirement: Fire Marshal Insurance Underwriter Developer's Engineer City Utility Other: 1. Area is served by: (A)4 / Pis {)--;C,1-' A/ / S (Utility) p Owner /Agent's Signature: G Parma rif.(. , Date: 9 /.1-19/Dy This certificate is not valid without Water District No. 125's attachment entitled "Attachment to Certificate of Water Availability." PART B: (TO BE COMPOT'ED BY WATER UTILITY) • 1. The proposed project is located within /4'714-G )6(v1Cy (City/County) �J 2. Improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of project before connection: 3. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a residual pressure of 2-0 psi at 1-7'r 000 gpm for a duration of Z- hours at a velocity of 1®. S fps as documented by the attached calculations. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. ki Hq co. tx.)ATr OtSr zS Q.c.c,:.z)LJ 9 z osc Agency one By 1 Date PART C: (TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTION) 1. Water Availability - Check one Acceptable service can be provided to this project. Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements listed in item #C2 are met. System isn't capable of providing service to this project. 2. Minimum water system improvements: (At least equal to #B2 above) Agency/Phone By Date 6 ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 125 The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability ( "Certificate "). 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the City of SeaTac ( "City"). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City, and is not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, express or implied, that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals, and authorizations from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all federal, state, and District laws, ordinances, policies and regulations in effect at the time of such application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulations then in effect. Applicant's Signature District Representative CITY OF UKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:. CENDANT CAR RENTAL GROUP, INC. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 15820 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD TAX PARCEL 11222304 - 9102 -02, 222304 - 9015 -07, 222304 - 9102 -01 AND 222304 - 9001 -03 Quarter: SW1/4 of SWl /4 Section: 22 Township: 23N Range: 4 E. W.M. (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Karl Westermann. Cendant Car Rental Group Address: 3937 South 26th Street, Dallas. TX 75261 Phone: 972 -453 -4062 FAX: Signature: RECEIVED 1.W3 1 DBE DPM NT ( -z-) 4S3 -4ao2 OrU \ \SERVER \D - DRIVE \04 \20457\tukwila dr process \SEPA_APP - completed.doc, 09 /24/04 Date: &O4O '8 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P-,SEPA Planner: File Number: Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:. CENDANT CAR RENTAL GROUP, INC. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 15820 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD TAX PARCEL 11222304 - 9102 -02, 222304 - 9015 -07, 222304 - 9102 -01 AND 222304 - 9001 -03 Quarter: SW1/4 of SWl /4 Section: 22 Township: 23N Range: 4 E. W.M. (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Karl Westermann. Cendant Car Rental Group Address: 3937 South 26th Street, Dallas. TX 75261 Phone: 972 -453 -4062 FAX: Signature: RECEIVED 1.W3 1 DBE DPM NT ( -z-) 4S3 -4ao2 OrU \ \SERVER \D - DRIVE \04 \20457\tukwila dr process \SEPA_APP - completed.doc, 09 /24/04 Date: &O4O '8 Revised 1/12/05 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. An electronic version of this form is also available from the Department of Community Development. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 2. Name of Applicant: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 3. Date checklist prepared: September 27, 2004 (Revised 1/12/05) 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila Agency Comments 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence tenant improvement construction as soon as possible after receipt of construction permits (anticipated 1/31/05 (Revised 1/12/05)). Construction complete by approximately 6/1/05. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NA 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Construction/Building permits and Design Review. See cover sheet A0.1 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Demolition of existing theater, new site security fence and guard booth, new exterior and interior tenant improvements to Administration Facility (past Theater concessions) and Maintenance Facility (bowling alley), site improvements and new QTA (car wash and fuel island) building. 11. Location of the proposal. • Give sufficient information for a person to understand the • precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, - • • vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard, tax parcels 222304 - 9102 -02, 222304 - 9015 -07, 222304 - 9102 -01 and 222304 - 9001 -03, portion of SW1 /4 or SW1 /4, section 22, TWP 23N, RGE 4 E., W.M. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes Agency Comments kA *itt- loth%(Aes 5i`'` el) c A•st. ketflYIVI G11�MS 4.1() Vi ')3, Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): 1�, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Existing paved site and buildings. Site is basically flat. Agency Comments b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Slopes range from 1% to 5% over the majority of the site (including the portion of the site targeted for work under this application). A shallow ravine in the undeveloped area to the east has slopes in excess of 40 %. No work is proposed in or near that area. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? . If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The Soil Survey of King County Area Washington identifies an Alderwood gravelly sandy loam in this area. The hardpan layer for this soil is usually located 20 to 40 inches below the surface. The permeability is moderate (2.0 to 6.0 per hour) and erosion hazard is also considered moderate for this soil. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not known at this time. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill will be brought in from off -site to fill any subterranean areas left over after demolition of the theater building to bring that area back to grade and match the existing surrounding elevations. Amount of fill is estimated to be approx. 500 cubic yards. • • Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, in some areas of the site during construction. However, erosion and sedimentation control measures will be required by the City and the approved TGSCP will be accomplished during the construction period. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Building will be approximately 56,900 sq. ft. total (8.6% of total site), canopies will be approximately 9,800 sq.ft (1.5% of total site), landscaping will be approximately 132,000 sgft (20.0% of total site) and approximate paving will be 470,089 sq.ft. total (approximately 71.3% total impervious coverage) (total site is 658,989 sq ft.)(Revised .. 1/12/05) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The proposed project will use best management practice methodology as required by the City to minimize erosion and sedimentation in accordance with the approved TGSCP. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Auto, truck and van emissions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A watercourse (Gilliam Creek) is located on the perimeter of the proposed site (east side). The watercourse is fed from flows which originate largely in the City of SeaTac, from development at the northeast corn of Pacific Highway South and S. 160th Street, and possibly north and west from airport area and a part of Pacific Highway South which then flow into Gilliam Creek. The headwaters to Gilliam Creek begin in a shallow ravine . located on the undeveloped easterly side of the site. Discharge to Gilliam Creek is via a 36- inch diameter pipe that traverses the southerly portion of the site. Areas off -site to the west drain through this system. Existing site drainage currently ties into this piped system prior to discharge to Gilliam Creek. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The new car wash gas island facility is within 200' -0" of the end of the existing drainage pipe. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not anticipated at this time. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as'necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. None required. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, wastewater will be discharged to a sanitary sewer (Valvue Sewer District.) b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to ground water. Stormwater will be discharged to the existing drainage corridor parallel to SR 518 (Gilliam Creek) adjoining the site. The headwaters to Gilliam Creek begin in a shallow ravine located on the undeveloped easterly side of the site. Discharge to Gilliam Creek is via a 36 -inch diameter pipe that traverses the southerly portion of the site. Areas off -site to the west drain through this system. Existing site drainage currently ties into this piped system prior to discharge to Gilliam Creek. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No waste material will be discharged via septic system. Sanitary sewer expected to serve approximately 150 employees per shift. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Anticipated storm runoff from the project area will be collected via downspouts, area drains and catchbasins. This runoff will be routed via underground pipe and tied into the existing piped system which discharges to Gilliam Creek. Gilliam Creek flows to the Green River. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface .waters ?. If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Per discussions with City of Tukwila, flow control is not required. Water quality treatment is required for runoff from the areas of new pavement replacing the existing theater building. This drainage will be collected and routed through a water quality facility, designed to City of Tukwila standards. An oil -water separator will be provided in the proposed fueling area to provide additional treatment, prior to runoff from that area being routed through the water quality facility. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing parking lot planter islands will be partially removed /modified as shown on A1.1, necessitating removal of groundcover shrubs and ornamental trees. c. List threatened or endangered.species known to be on or near the site. None known. 'Agency Comments d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Additional Buffer and Interior Parking Lot plantings will be provided as a part of planned project. Existing planting areas not disrupted by project renovations will be retained and `enhanced' by removal of any invasive species and supplemented with additional plant material. Any existing trees evaluated as candidates `to remain' will have Tree Protection Techiques employed during construction. All new plant material selections will consider use of natives and drought tolerant materials. Deciduous treLaldej)maple, aspen, ICot Evergreen tree: fir, ceda► pine, othe Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing parking lot planter islands will be partially removed /modified as shown on A1.1, necessitating removal of groundcover shrubs and ornamental trees. c. List threatened or endangered.species known to be on or near the site. None known. 'Agency Comments d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Additional Buffer and Interior Parking Lot plantings will be provided as a part of planned project. Existing planting areas not disrupted by project renovations will be retained and `enhanced' by removal of any invasive species and supplemented with additional plant material. Any existing trees evaluated as candidates `to remain' will have Tree Protection Techiques employed during construction. All new plant material selections will consider use of natives and drought tolerant materials. Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other k heron, eagle, songbirds, other: pigeons /sea:ulls (revised 1/12/05) Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Gilliam Creek has occasional Chinook juveniles: Gilliam Creek is connected to the Green River, a river that has documented chinook use. Because of this, Gilliam Creek does have an occasional presence of Chinook juveniles up to the 1 -5 crossing. Since juvenile access to Gilliam Creek is not a "recent" or "subsequent" situation, it is expected that there will be some level ofjuvenile chinook use within the lower reach of Gilliam Creek throughout much of the year. Information as received by 12/21/04 email from Ryan Partee, Fisheries Biologist — City of Tukwila. (Revised 1/12/05) c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Pacific flyway for migrating birds. (Revised 1/12/05) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Water quality measures. See Temporary Erosion Control Plan, sheet CO2 attached. Storm filters and cartridges in storm vaults will be provided in the new parking areas as shown on C04 and C09, attached. (Revised 1/12/05) Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical for lighting, cooling, tools and heating. Natural gas will also be used to heat the administration and maintenance building(s). Agency Comments 4 • Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The project will comply with State of Washington's Energy Code requirements. (Revised 1/12/05) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. An above ground fuel tank is used at the QTA. See A1.1, attached. (Revised 1/12/05) 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Police response, fire department response, or emergency medical response could be required (aid car, ambulance). 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Cendant's professional environmental consultant, Geomatrix, is preparing an SPCC plan in accordance with Federal guidelines and applicable State and Local regulations for this site to address the potential oil, gas and hazardous spills. This plan will be on file at the site before any bulk petroleum products are delivered to the site. (Revised 1/12/05) 11111 Revised 1/12/05 • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: -: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Auto and truck traffic, equipment used in nearby car wash operations (part of the car rental use), and HVAC (air conditioning) systems. See attached data sheets for HVAC units. (Revised 1/12/05) 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Sources of noise will be from traffic coming onto and off the site (cars, trucks and vans) and from the HVAC (airconditioning unit) system. The site will be operating 24 hours per day, however, most of the activity takes place between 6 AM and 10 PM. The average length of stay is unlike parking for a traditional commercial use in which the parking lot empties out each day. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Structures for the maintenance, office and ingress /egress have been placed at the center of the site, away from the existing residential areas to the south. Limit grading, construction to daylight hours. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for a church on interim/month to month basis. Adjacent development includes residential, a church and an airport parking facility. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in the recent past. • • Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: ' Agency Comments c. Describe any structures on the site. Two outdoor billboards, a cellular antenna site, bowling alley and theater (used for church). d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, theaters. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Regional Commercial (RC) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Regional Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The northeast landscaped edge of the existing development at the Cendant site (the Lewis & Clark parking lot and landscaping) adjoins a ravine to the east. None of the proposed changes to the site as part of the Cendant project include any modification to the east edge of the existing development. A portion of the ravine contains some environmentally sensitive areas — some steep slopes and a delineated wetland. The existing wetland was delineated as a part of the ShuttlePark 2 (formerly Ouik Park) project. A wetland enhancement plan is currently being executed for the wetland area. Stormwater drainage for the parking area is currently handled through a series of catch basins and curbing along the east edge of the existing parking lot preventing any sheet flow from the parking area to the ravine. (Revised 1/12/05) (Revised 1/12/05) Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Maintenance Facility is 29 ' -9 " +/- above grade at ridge; mechanical enclosure is 36'- 0 " +/- above grade at ridge. Administration building is 18' -9 " +/- at new fascia. QTA facility will be 20' -2 " +/- tall. Existing site light standards are 30' tall. Principal building materials: painted split face concrete masonry blocks, painted "hardiplank" veneer over existing concrete block walls, painted concrete walls, painted plaster walls, prefinished metal fascia, wall panels and canopies; painted glu -lam beams, anodized aluminium glass storefront with glass windows and doors, painted metal man and overhead doors, painted exterior insulation finish system (plaster) mechanical enclosures (Revised 1/12/05). b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed development will include landscaping on the perimeter of the site, required interior parking lot landscaping and site fencing and security. w • • Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The sources of lighting are the parking lot lighting and the headlights in use during the nighttime hours. Site lights will have cut -off sheilds so that no Tight glare is distributed off site to other adjacent property. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Agency Comments �' c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The exterior lighting for the proposed project will include cut -off features on site lights aimed at eliminating light and glare from this propertyy impacting the adjoining properties. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None (Revised 1/12/05) • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None needed or anticipated. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National,. State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Painted murals at bowling alley. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Murals to be made available to the City of Tukwila to remove from the site. • (Revised 1/12/05) Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: - Agency Comments 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main site access is from S 160`h Street through an existing curb cut and drive aisle. Employee parking will be accessed from an existing curb cut Tukwila International Boulevard. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. The site is currently served by METRO route 170. Additional METRO routes are located to the west on International Boulevard South (Route #s 170, 174 and 191.) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? There are approximately 990 parking spaces. There are some existing parking spaces at the site that would be eliminated, but some spaces are replaced in a new configuration in the new employee parking lot and car storage lot. Total number of cars is not decreased (Revised 1/12/05). d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). . f +avii& c. I.Aplyvca evi \S G,13tiS S. 14 1" 5j,K 3� e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: ! Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See Traffic Analysis prepared by Transporation Solutions,Inc g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: See Traffic Analysis. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection; health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None anticipated. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewe system other: None eptic It Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Seattle City Light (power); Water District # 125; Valvue Utility District (sewer); US West (telephone). The source of heating energy for the administration and maintenance buildings will be natural gas which will be brought to the site on demand. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on the to make its deci jon. Signature: Date Submitted: l/i spc (NON = PROJECT'PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING -CODE TEXT. CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). . z�t Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No increase anticipated. Proposed measures,to'avoid or reduce such increases are: None required. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? See response to question 5b and 5d of "State Environmental Checklist" attached (Revised 1/12/05) Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: See response to question 5d of "State Environmental Checklist" attached (Revised 1/12/05) Revised 1/12/05 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? None anticipated. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None required. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental . protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic.or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains; or . prime farmlands? No effect anticipated as the site will have a stormwater vault for the new parking area and . an oil /water separator at the QTA building. Also see item below for reference to SPCC plan (Revised 1/12/05). Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Cendant's professional environmental consultant, Geomatrix, is preparing an SPCC plan in accordance with Federal guidelines and applicable State and Local regulations for this site to address the potential oil, gas and hazardous spills. This plan will be on file at the site before anv bulk petroleum products are delivered to the site. (Revised 1/12/05) 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No effect anticipated. Agency Comments • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures required. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? No increase anticipated. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None required. 7. Identify; if possible, whether the °proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflict anticipated. Agency Comments City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist • City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: September 27, 2004 (revised .1/12/05) Applicant Name: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. Street Address: 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard City, State, Zip: Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: 972 - 453 -4062 Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho, salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 25, 2001 ii Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 ®- Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 0- Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black. Rivers or in .wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 Oft - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 Part A (continued) City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 1 Revised 1/12/05 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2. 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, theGreen/Duwamish. rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 - Continue to Question 1 -3 (revised 1/12/05) (See Civil sheets C04 & C09 dated 11/17/04) 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist • NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) - Continue to Question 1 -4 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) CO- Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. Co - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. 42) - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. v) Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. CI Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) • City of Tukwila Eo Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses• or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion; or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal 1 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist from a watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate - response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater • support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance.wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly. waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. , .. . NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar, structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) 4' 8" Dia 2.75" (Lettering, Red) NOTICE OF LAND USE ACTION 1.5" (Lettering) TYPE OF ACTION: SEPA Environmental Review and Design Review PROJECT NAME: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. SITE ADDRESS: 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard APPLICANT: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 3937 South 26th Street Dallas, TX 75261 1.5" (Lettering) TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT PLANNER AT (206) 431 -3670 Tukwila Planning Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 1.0" (LETTERING) FIGURE 4 \ \SERVER \D- DRNE \04 \20457\tukwila dr process \SEPA_APP - completed.doc, 09/24/04 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Convnunity Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanna ci.tukwila.waus A}JiIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERNIISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON u COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers= contractors or other representatives the right toeuter upon Own ` s 1 property, located at 15820 International Blvd. S., Tukwila, WA 91188 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6.. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non- responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at Bellevue (city), WA (state), on September 21 , 2004 David Schooley 17/CS • 54e-(( ( (Print Name) 600 106th Ave. NE, #200 (Address) (4. ) 455-8167 (Phon 1 (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me Du V l t�l c I e to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. 4 l� tioAzi SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME 0 a I DAY OF — e 1a_'L!t 201 �1.1.1l��!� � � NOT ' Y PUBLIC in and r• the State of Washington residing at ( kit V My Commission expires on 1 0 711 /0 7 t. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tulavila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us • AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I , Chandler Eason (PRINT NAME) understand that . Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness (to be completed by Michael Aippersbach, SRO representative, after package is designated as complete by City of Tukwila).. I certify that on the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Chandler Eason Applicant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires SEPAAPP- completed -VU 1/12/05 01- 000- 41943163 AVIS DOMESTIC Check Number: VOUCHER NUMBER INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE BATCH NUMBER GROSS AMOUNT NET AMOUNT 391264 SEPA 09 -23 -04 RR034 500.00 500.00 AVIS Rent a Car System, Inc. TOTAL 300 Centre Pointe Drive, Virginia Beach, VA 23462 AMOUNT 500.00 500.00 A I'IS 3V00 Cee Dve 23462 irginia ntrBeachPointe , Virginia ri Bank of America Atlanta. GA PAY PAY TO THE ORDER OF Five hundred and 00 /100 Dollars CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD SUITE 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 CO BK 02 -02 Avis features GM cars. CHECK NUMBER VOID AFTER 90 DAYS CHECK DATE 09/23/04 64-1278 611 NET AMOUNT $500.00 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. # 004300 -0310 J S Investments 15426 — 35th Avenue S Tukwila WA 98188 # 004300 -0335 National Tax Search LLC 3816 S. 154th Lane Tukwila WA 98188 # 004300 -0395 J S Investments ;. 15426 — 35th Avenue S Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appl.s City of Tukwila WA # 222304 -9064. Dollar Devt. Company 15833 International Blvd SeaTac WA 98188 dell/mike/maa proj files/cendant dsk: perimeter mailing labels 1 — 09.20.04 # 222304 -9001 Sterling Realty Organization PO Box 91723 Bellevue WA 98104 -1723 # 222304 -9015 Sterling Realty Organization PO Box 91723 Bellevue WA 98104 -1723 # 222304 -9017 Sterling Realty Organization PO Box 91723 Bellevue WA 98104 -1723 # 222304 -9023 Michael Roger + Et. Al. 15635 International Boulevard S SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9030 Michael Roger 15653 Pacific Highway S SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9030 Riverton Hgts Presbyterian 15880 Military Road S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9042 Dollar Devt. Company 15823 Pacific Highway S SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9045 Dollar Devt. Company 15850 Pacific Highway S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9055 Dollar Devt. Company 15835 International Blvd Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9024 Dollar Devt. Company 15858 Pacific Highway S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9029 WA State Patrol 15700 Pacific Highway S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9031 State of Washington 15849 International Blvd SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9043 Port of Seattle 15601 International Blvd SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9054 Port of Seattle 15845 Pacific Highway S SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9062 Jack E. Nichols 3061 S 158th Street Tukwila WA 98188 # 282304 -9016 Port of Seattle 1500 S 184th Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9068 Dougherty Family Limited PA 15848 Pacific Highway S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9071 WA State Patrol 15700 Pacific Highway S Tukwila WA 98188 # 222304 -9075 Singh Sukhjinder. 15843 Pacific Highway S SeaTac WA 98188 # 222304 -9101 Sterling Realty Organization PO Box 91723 Bellevue WA 98104 -1723 # 537980 -0850 Drs Gregory & Diedre Yen 16006 Military Road S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1002 Addie A Ryals 16034 — 34th Avenue S Seatac WA 98188 # 537980 -1020 Northern Hospitality LLC 3423 S 160th Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1090 David Pak 16033 Military Road S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1118 Magher Singh 16111 — 37th Lane S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1130 Rodney J Rosatto 3456 S 162nd Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -0840 Steven Grant & Heather S 16014 Military Road S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1000 Addie A Ryals 16006 — 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1005 Corie Brook & David Lipshin 16030 — 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1040 Birchwood Apts LLC 3435 S 160th Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1116 Norman Regan 16106- 37thLaneS SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1120 Santos G Palma 16105 — 37th Lane S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1150 Daniel & Kim Fabrizio 3436 S 162nd Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1160 Tommy B Lopez 3426 S 162nd Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1177 Hardeep Singh 16106 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1179 Surinder Singh 16116 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1210 Gordon Tang 16020 32nd Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1270 Robert S Thayer 3249 S 160th Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1310 Gordon Cletus 3246 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1330 Kenneth & Dena Mathews 3230 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1350 Fred G Alvarado 3218 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1395 Joan J Johnson 3229 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1510 Deanna T Cope 3241 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1.170 Angela & Christopher Cooper 3422 S 162nd Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1178 Surya Prakash 16110 — 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1190 Time Oil Co 16006 Pacific Highway S SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1260 Kevin & Michelle Elliot 3223 S 160th Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1300 Raymond Wageman 3260 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1320 Robert J Thayer 3242 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1340 James L Culp 3224 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 # 537980 -1380 Heather A Watson 3221 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.20.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike /maa proj files/cendant.dsk: perimeter mailing labels 2 — 09.20.04 Parcel # 537980 -1425 Linda K Criswell 3521 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 537980 -1427 Tritec Homes 3362 S 162nd Street SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 940940-0115 Teresa Loudon 16005 International Boulevard SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 537980 -1426 Joan J Johnson Address SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 537980 -1430 Stephanie R Criswell 16103 — 34th Avenue S SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 537980 -1400 Kent V Ham 3237 S 161st Street SeaTac WA 98188 Parcel # 537980 -1415 Joan J Johnson 3242 s 162nd Street Tukwila WA 98188 Parcel # 000000 -0000 Name Address Tukwila WA 98188 Parcel # 000000 -0000 Name address Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.20.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike/maa proj files /cendant.dsk: perimeter mailing labels 3 — 09.20.04 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A- 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 2 SeaTac WA 981&8 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - C - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - A - 7 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 - B - 7 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 1 -C -7 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 — A - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 — B - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - C - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - A - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - B - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - C - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 — A - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike/maa proj files/cendant.dsk: condo mailing labels 1— 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - B - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - C - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - A - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - B - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - C - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 IIC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - A - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - B - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 2 - C - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 1 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 2 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 3 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 4 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480- 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 5 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - A - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - B - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 KC Parcel # 241480 - 0010/0540 Owner /Occupant 3503 S. 160th St., Unit 3 - C - 6 SeaTac WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike /maa prof files/cendant.dsk: condo mailing labels 2 — 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 33 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811. S 154th Lane, Unit 34 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 35 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 36 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 37 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 38 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 39 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3811 S 154th Lane, Unit 40 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 41 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 42 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 43 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 44 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 45 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 46 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 47 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3724 S 154th Lane, Unit 48 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 1 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 2 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 3 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 4 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 5 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 6 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 7 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3831 S 154th Lane, Unit 8 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 9 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 10 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 11 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3 824 S 154th Lane, Unit 12 Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike/maa proj files/dendant dsk: apt mailing labelsl — 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 13 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 14 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 15 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 16 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 17 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 18 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 19 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 20 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 21 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 22 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 23 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3816 S 154th Lane, Unit 24 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 25 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 26 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 27 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 28 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3 819 S 154th Lane, Unit 29 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 30 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 31 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3819 S 154th Lane, Unit 32 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 3824 S 154th Lane, Unit 49 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 50 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 51 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 52 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 53 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 54 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 55 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15423 — 38th Lane S, Unit 56 Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike /maa prof files /cendantdsk: apt mailing labels 2- 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 57 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 58 Tukwila WA 98188 . KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 59 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 60 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 61 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 62 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 63 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15435 — 38th Lane S, Unit 64 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 65 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel #.004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 66 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 67 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 68 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 69 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 70 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 71 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 72 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 73 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 74 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 75 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 76 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 77 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 78 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 79 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 80 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 81 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 82 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 83 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 84 Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike/maa proj files/cendant.dsk: apt mailing labels 3 — 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 85 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 86 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 87 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15443 — 38th Lane S, Unit 88 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 89 tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 90 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 91 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 92 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 93 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 94 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 95 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 1.5448 — 38th Lane S, Unit 96 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 97 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 98 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 99 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 100 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 101 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 102 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 103 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 104 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 105 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 106 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 107 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 108 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 109 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 110 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 111 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15438 — 38th Lane S, Unit 112 Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell/mike/maa proj files /cendant.dsk: apt mailing labels 4 — 09.21.04 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 113 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 114 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 115 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 116 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 117 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 118 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 119 Tukwila WA 98188 KC Parcel # 004300 -0335 Owner /Occupant 15426 — 38th Lane S, Unit 120 Tukwila WA 98188 Mailing label list for Cendant 09.21.04 SEPA & Design Review Appls City of Tukwila WA dell /mike/maa proj files/cendant.dsk: apt mailing labels 5 — 09.21.04 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: City Clerk City of SeaTac 4800 S. 1886 St. SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 AGREEMENT TO PAY FOR DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS Owner(s): Sterling Realty Organization, Co. City: City of SeaTac, a municipal corporation Abbreviated Legal Description: Section 22 Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. 102 Parcel 1 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment #L02 -046 per K. C. Recording #20021025900001 said boundary line adjustment is located in South 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 together with vacated S 158th St & vacated Military Rd. S. per City of Tukwila Ord #1878 K. C. Recording #20021025000129 (full legal see Exhibit "A" on pages 6 and 7). Assessor's Property Tax Parcel Account Number(s): 222304 -9102 Reference Numbers of Documents Assigned or Released, if Applicable: N/A THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this /5 r` day of 2005, by and between Sterling Realty Organization, Co., hereinafter called the "Ow fier ", and the City of SeaTac, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter called the "City ", on the following terms and conditions. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner is the owner of real property in the City of SeaTac, County of King, State of Washington, located at 15820 International Blvd. and more particularly described as shown on Exhibit "A:, attached hereto at the pages referred above (the "Property "); and PAGE 1 WHEREAS, the Owner has made application to the City of Tukwila for permits to make certain improvements and/or develop the above - referenced Property, which permits have been approved, subject to construction of specified off -site improvements to the City of SeaTac right - of -way frontage on S. 160th St. at Owner's cost; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to defer construction of those required improvements and the City is willing to permit deferral subject to this covenant and the agreement contained herein; NOW, THEREFORE, based upon good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner covenants and the parties agree as follows: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The Owner hereby agrees and covenants to A. Dedicate a 15 ft. wide strip of land adjacent to the S. 160th St right -of -way to the City of SeaTac which strip is 494LF, for right -of -way use together with a 10 ft. wide temporary construction easement area (the "Easement Area ") immediately adjacent to said right -of -way dedication. This will facilitate the City's construction of the deferred improvements. Upon and after such dedication, the Owner shall no longer have any responsibility for landscaping the dedicated area (exclusive of the Easement Area) but shall maintain it in accordance with the SMC 11.05.140. B. Pay to the City of SeaTac a sum of money ($157,867.58) equal to the estimated per linear foot cost of the improvements ($199.57 per linear foot 2007 dollars) times the frontage distance (494 LF) on S. 160th St. and the estimated per square foot face of a MSE (mechanically stabilized earth) wall with an average height of 4 feet for the frontage distance (494 LF) along S. 160th St. Frontage Improvement Costs: $199.57 per LF x 494 LF = $ 98.587.58 Wall Costs: $ 30.00 per SF Face x 1976 SF Face = $ 59,280.00 Total Estimated Cost to Be Contributed to a CIP Fund: $ 157,867.58 These funds shall be placed by the City of SeaTac into the City's Transportation Improvement Fund to be used on either or both of the following Capital Improvement Projects, subject to the terms of this Agreement: PAGE 2 ST-015 -- 34'x' Ave. S. (from S. 160th St. to S. 176`h St.). ST-122 — Military Rd. S. (from S. 160th St. to S. 179th St.). 2. DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS The City agrees to allow the Owner to defer the making, constructing, installing, and providing for the on -site and/or off -site improvements identified and set forth in Paragraph 1B and 4 of this Agreement, provided that the Owner completes its obligation as described in Paragraph 1 within 30 days of the above date of this Agreement. 3. NOTICE AND TIME OF CONSTRUCTION The obligation of the Owner to make, construct, install and provide for the off-site' improvements ( "the Improvements ") described and set forth in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement shall be satisfied by the payment of funds, . dedication of right -of -way, and granting of the temporary construction easement as described in Paragraph 4. The City shall use the funds to construct the Improvements at such time as the City constructs either of the projects listed in Paragraph 1 within the time frame of the City's current Transportation Improvement Plan or five (5) years from the date of this Agreement, whichever is sooner. If construction of the projects has not commenced prior to the fifth (5th) anniversary of this Agreement, then in such event, the parties agree to either, at the Owner's election: (a) enter into a new Deferral Agreement (which new Deferral Agreement shall commence upon the termination of this Agreement) with exactly the same terms and conditions as set forth herein, except that the time limit for commencement of construction of the projects by the City shall be five (5) years from the execution date of that new Deferral Agreement, or (b) the funds plus accrued interest shall be returned to the Owner and the Owner shall design the frontage improvements along Owner's Property that fronts on 160th, and provide the City with a bond for those improvements. The funds, plus accrued interest, shall be returned to Owner only in the following circumstances: (i) Construction of either of the projects has not commenced by the fifth (5th) anniversary of this Agreement, and the Owner elects subsection 3(b) above; or (ii) The Owner elects subsection 3(a) above, and the construction of the improvements has not commenced during the five (5) year term of the new Deferral Agreement.. PAGE 3 4. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A. The off -site improvements, the construction of which is deferred by terms of this Agreement are described as follows: 494 linear ft. of portland cement concrete vertical curb and gutter; 494 linear feet of portland cement concrete sidewalk (minimum 6 ft. wide); commercial driveway approach (maximum width of 30 ft.); street trees (2.5" caliper as measured 4 feet above the ground at time of planting) (30 ft. on center); street lighting (150 ft. on center); landscape strip (minimum 5 ft. wide); 494 linear feet of 12" diameter storm drainage piping; type I catch basins (300 ft. on center); topsoil for landscape strip (minimum of 6" deep); seeding of landscape strip; 494 linear feet of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) wall with Keystone or other equivalent facing and an average height of 4 ft.; asphalt concrete pavement (4 to 6 inches thick) to widen the existing paved road from the current %z street pavement section of 22 ft. to a %z street pavement section of 28 ft.; 6" of crushed surfacing base and top course under the pavement and sidewalk sections; roadway excavation; traffic control; 494 linear feet of sawcutting of existing pavement; mobilization; clearing and grubbing of organic matter from the construction areas; and engineering and contingency. B. Grantor, the Owner, in consideration of mutual benefits for public use, does hereby grant to Grantee, the. City, and its agents or assigns, the right, permit, license, and easement ( "Easement ") to use and occupy Easement Area described in Paragraph 1 A above from date of the beginning of the City's construction of the off -site improvements described in Paragraph 1 and 4 above (the "Project ") until the completion of the construction pursuant to the timeline hereinafter described. Grantee shall notify Grantor in writing at least sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of the Project, which notice shall contain the timeline for the Project. Grantee shall complete the Project within that timeline, subject to events of force majeure. This Easement is being given under threat of and in lieu of eminent domain C. During construction of the Project, and to the extent that the City has to remove any portion of the secured fencing around the Property, then the City shall provide substitute security fencing for the duration of construction. At the completion of construction, the City shall reinstall the security fencing around the Property in materials and in the locations approved by Owner. D. Grantee does hereby release, indemnify and promise to defend and save Grantor harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred by Grantor in defense thereof, resulting or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of acts or omissions of Grantee or its servants, agents, employees or contractors in the exercise of the rights granted herein; provided, however, this paragraph does not indemnify Grantor against liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the negligence of Grantor or Grantor's agents or employees. PAGE 4 E. It is understood and agreed that upon completion of construction of the Project, Grantee or its agents shall restore the disturbed lands, at Grantee's sole cost, as nearly as possible to the condition immediately before the Property was entered upon by Grantee, including the security fencing referenced above. Such restoration work shall include, but not be limited to the installation and/or replacement of irrigation facilities, plantings, landscaping and lighting fixtures that were disturbed or destroyed; and the installation and/or replacement of drainage facilities. 5. AGREEMENT APPURTENANT AND BINDING ON SUCCESSORS This Agreement and the covenants, conditions, and terms hereof shall be appurtenant to, and shall run with, the real property described in Exhibit "A" of this Agreement, and shall be binding on the heirs, assigns, and successors in interest of the Owner. 6. CHOICE OF LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event of any litigation regarding construction or effect of this Agreement, or the rights of the parties to . this Agreement, it is agreed that venue shall be King County, Washington. 7. COSTS TO PREVAILING PARTY In the event that either party initiates any action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 8. LIDS. By Owner's performance of its obligations set forth in Paragraph 1 above, the City agrees that Owner shall have satisfied any and all assessments or obligations that may hereinafter be imposed pursuant to a LID formed with respect to either or both of the projects referenced in Paragraph 1, and that no special assessment shall be made against Owner with respect to any such future LID. 9. CITY'S APPROVAL OF TUKWILA PERMITS. The City agrees, upon full execution of this Agreement, to provide the City of Tukwila with written approval of the Owner's SEPA checklist, and to notify the City of Tukwila that the Owner has satisfied the City's requirements re: off -site improvements associated with Owner's project. PAGE 5 10. ENTIRE INSTRUMENT Exhibit "A ", and the improvements described in Paragraphs 1B and 4 of this Agreement, contain the entire understanding of the parties with respect to the matter set forth and herein and any prior or contemporaneous understandings are merged herein. This Agreement shall not be modified except by written Agreement executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective on the date and year first above set forth. Owner: Sterling Realty Organization, Co. By: avid Schooler President STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) City of SeaTac: Dale Schroeder, P.E. Public Works Director Approved as to Form: I_ / ': . ! , `.dam L By: - ul i A-- ELs atts-oa.0 City Attorney On this day personally appeared before me David Schooler, to me known to be the President of Sterling Realty Organization, Co., the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. GIVEN under my hand and official seal or stamp this 1-3 day of 2005. P nt Name: NOTARY PUBL C in and for the S of Washington, residing at My commission expires: PAGE 6 ,e,h1DCAi-j STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day, personally appeared before me Dale Schroeder, P.E., to me known to be the Public Works Director of the City of SeaTac, Grantee herein, who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that the said instrument was signed as his free and voluntary act and deed for and on behalf of the City, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument for and on behalf of the City. GIVEN under my hand and official seal or stamp this sit. day of 41.),-; 2005. A> r.-- Print Name: S lyw G. tJ ).; t s t.--- NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at }1-0 My commission expires: D3 — D 7 —6? PAGE 7 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 88 °38'54" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION • 22, A DISTANCE OF 542.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°21'06" EAST, 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; • THENCE NORTH 00 °54'31" EAST, 202.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °38'54" WEST, 186.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17 °12'20" EAST, 155.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°38'54" WEST, 187.81 FEET TO .A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF PACIFIC HWY. SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 20 °06'06" EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY, 398.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED SOUTH 158TH STREET; THENCE NORTH 51°34'14" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF VACATED SOUTH 158TH STREET, 89.42 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 35°51'14" EAST, 180.60 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 70 °59'44" EAST, 90.86 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED OLD MILITARY ROAD AND A POINT ON A NON TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 477.68 FEET TO WHICH A RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 82°24'12" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 68.35 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 °11'53 "; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 39 °40'27" EAST, 31.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 5 °59'59" EAST 4.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF S.R. 518; THENCE SOUTH 77°56'12" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 22.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82 °02'59" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 324.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56 °18'54" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 115.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °30'59" EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN 5.44 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MARGIN SOUTH 00°29'01" EAST 215.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 °30'59" EAST, 7.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°29'01" EAST, 118.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°53'12" WEST, 147.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 52 °02'06" WEST, 147.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37 °57'54" EAST, 166.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26 °58'59" EAST, 41.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37 °57'54" EAST, 40.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 °21'06" WEST, 199.21 FEET TO THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 160TH STREET; THENCE NORTH 88°38'54" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 493.91 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT, THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 8 • • COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE SOUTH 88°38'54" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, A DISTANCE OF 441.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01°21'06" EAST, 290.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02 °09'44" EAST, 39.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°50'16" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 °09'44" EAST, 72.30 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 87 °50'16" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 °09'44" EAST, 7.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°50'1 6"WEST, .4.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 °09'44" EAST, 11.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°50'16" WEST, 36.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 °14'55" EAST, 138.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81°02'13" WEST, 10.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °12'40" WEST, 4.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °47'20" WEST, 36.40 FEET TO A POINT OF A NON TANGENT CURVE, AT WHICH POINT THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS NORTH 89°31'00" EAST, DISTANT 443.57 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°19'16", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 242.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 °01'33" EAST, 38.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 °58'27" WEST, 3.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68 °28'04" EAST, 35.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °43'49" EAST, 23.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 °58'32" EAST 4.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 °01'28" EAST, 48.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27 °58'32" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 °01'28" EAST, 16.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 °58'32" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62 °01'28" EAST, 23.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 °58'32" WEST, 12.47 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °58'40" EAST, 62.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °01'20" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °58'40" EAST, 6.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°01'20" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °58'40" EAST, 28.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15°09'13" WEST, 90.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°45'12" EAST, 8.23 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE, AT WHICH POINT THE RADIAL CENTER BEARS SOUTH 02 °14 "48" WEST, DISTANT 31.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 150 °04'49 ", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 81.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °06'21" WEST, 41.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °53'39" EAST, 10.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °06'21" WEST, 21.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °53'39" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °06'21" WEST, 3.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °53'39" WEST, 10.00 FEET; PAGE9 THENCE SOUTH 02 °06'21" WEST, 36.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °53'39" WEST, 10.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °14'47" WEST, 3.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°45'13" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °14'47" WEST, 65.68 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°45'13" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °14'47" WEST, 52.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °48'31" WEST, 119.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 °11'29" WEST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °48'31" WEST, 3.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 °11'29" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °48'31" WEST, 97.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SECONDARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1/L AS DESCRIBED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 545600. • • ALSO EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 285 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE CENTER LINE OF SR 518, RIVERTON HEIGHTS: SR 509 TO SR 5; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE TO A POINT OPPOSITE HIGHWAY ENGINEER'S STATION (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS H.E.S.) 128 +00; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT OPPOSITE H.E.S. 131 +40 AND A DISTANCE OF 245 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY THEREFROM; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT OPPOSITE H.E.S. 132 +50 AND A DISTANCE OF 280 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY THEREFROM; THENCE EASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT OPPOSITE H.E.S. 137 +35 AND A DISTANCE OF 170 FEET SOUTHERLY THEREFROM; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE TO H.E.S. 140+00 AND THE END OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO RIGHTS, TITLE, EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD OR WHICH ATTACH THERETO BY OPERATION OF LAW. PAGE 10 -One Lake Bellevue Dr., Ste 104, Bellevue WA 98005 PO Box 2137, Redmond, WA 98073-2137 P-hone: 425-898.1688 Fax, 425- 898 -0885 CHINN Construction, LLC To: Chandler- Blunk Demattei & Assoc. From: Kevin Chinn Fax: -- 650 -692 -0181 Date: January 7, 2005 Phone: Pages: 16 Re: Cendant - Tukwila, WA CC: ❑ Urgent • For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply 0 Please Recycle 'Comment: Chandler, Please find following cut sheets for the outdoor mechanical equipment that indicate outdoor sound decibel ratings. Please call if you have any questions. Thanks, Kevin TO 39dd RECEIVED 175 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOI ±Ol211SN00 NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZO OE:8T S00Z /L0 /T0 Z0 39Vd T E 6 Packaged Gas/Electric Rooftop Units Precedent' 3- 10Tons -60 Hz RECEIVED IJAH 13 2005 'DEVELOPMENT May 2004 RT- PR0006 -EN NOI.LDfl 1SNOO NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZV VE :8T S00Z /L0 /T0 Table GD-i - General Data General Data (3 - 4 To is) Standard Efficiency 3 Ton Convertible Units YSC036A1 YSC036A3, A4 AW YSCO48A1 YSCO48A3, A4, AW 4Ton Convt, tible Unite Coofug Performance' Gross Cooling Capacity 37,400 37,000 60,300 49,200 SEER' 10.5 10.7 10.1 10.0 Nominal CFM /ARI Rated CFM' 1,200/1,200 1,200/1,200 1,600/1,600 1,600/1,600 ARI Net Cooling Capacity 36,000 36,000 48,000 47.000 System Power (KW) 3.91 3.79 5.28 5.40 Fkuding Performance' Heating Models Law Medum • High Luw Medium High law Medium High I>Jw Medium High Heating Input (Btu) 60,000 80.000 120,000 50,000 80.000 120,000 60,000 80,000 120,000 60,000 80,000 120.000 Heating Output (68,) 47,000 63,000 95,000 48.000 64,000 96,000 47.000 63.000 95,000 48,000 64,000 96,000 AFUE IV 80 80 80 81 81 81 BO 80 80 81 81 81 Steady State Efficiency (q) BO 80 80 81 81 81 80 80 80 81 81 81 No. Burners 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 No. Stages 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Gas Supply Una Pressure Natural (minimurn/meximum) 4.5/14.0 4.5/14.0 4.5/14.0 4.5/14.0 LP (minimum/maximum) 10.0/14.0 10.0/14.0 10.0/14.0 10.0/14.0 Gas Connection Pipe Silo (In.) 1/2 12 1(2 12 12 12 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 112 1/2 Compressor No1 /Climatuff Hermetic 1 /ClimatuftHermetic 1 /Clln•ratuff Scroll 1 /CUmatuff Scroll Outdoor Sound Rating (dB) ,-__83 83 86 82 Outdoor Col -Type Lanced Lanced Lanced Lanced Tube Size (in.) OD 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 0.3126 Face Area (so ft) 7.19 • 7.19 6.17 9.59 Rows/FPI 2/17. 2/17 2/17 1/17 Indoor Coil -Type Lanced Lanced Lanced Lanced Tube Size (in.) 0.3125 0.3125 0.3125 .3125 Face Arca (se ft) 5.67 5.67 6.68 6.17 Rowe/FPI 2/16 2/16 3116 3/16 Refrigerant Comet Short Orifice Short Orifice Snort Orifice Short Orifice Drain Connection No ./Size (In.) 1/3/4 NPT 1/3/4 NPT 1/36 NPT 1/34 NPT Outdoor Fan -Type Propeller- Propeller Propeller Propeller No. Used/Diameter lin.) 1/22 1/22 122 1/22 DriveTyptiNo. Speeds Direct/1 Direct/1 Direct/1 Direct1 CRVt 2,550 2,550 2,850 3,610 No, MotorsMP 1/020 1/0.20 1/0.33 1/0.33 Motor RPM 1,076 1,076 1,076 1,075 Direct Drive Indoor Fan .Typc FC Centrifugal FC Centrifugal FC Centrifugal FC Centrifugal No. Used/Diamotcr (1n.) 1/10 x 10 1/10 x 10 1/11 x 11 1/11 x 11 DriveType/Ne. Speeds Direct/2 DireN2 Direct/2 Direct/2 No. Motors 1 1 1 1 Motor HP (Standard/Oversized) 0,33/0.50 0.33/0.50 0.60/0.80 0.60/0.80 Motor RPM (Standard/Oversized) 950/1,100' 930/1,100° 1,000/1,100 1,000/1.100 Motor Frame Slze (Standard/Oversized) 48/48 48/48 48148 48/48 R'FPRC006 -EN E0 39t1d 15 NOIlOnellSNO0 NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZP PE:8T S00Z /L0 /T0 General Data MANE` 6 Tc ns) Standarc I Efficiency ) Table GD-Z — General Oara Cog Peffonrtarrta' 6Ton Convtnlble YSC06UA1 YSC060A3, A4, AW, AK 6Ton Convertible , SC072A3, A4, AW, AK Grosa Cooling Capacity. 63,100 SEER/EER) 9.90/ — Nominal CFM /ARI Rated CFM . 2.0002,000 MI Net Cooling Capacity 60,000 integrated Pert Load Value- — Svstem Power (KW) 6.86 Heating Performance' Heating Models Low Medium High Heating Input (Btu) 60,000 80,000 130,000 Heating Output (Btu) 47,000 63,000 103,000 AFUE96' 81 81 80 Steady State Efficiency (%) 81 81 80 No. Burners 2 2 3 No. Stages 1 1 1 Gas Supply Lino Pressure Natural (minimum/maximum) 4.5/14.0 LP (minimum/meximum) • 10.0/14.0 Gat Connection Pipe Size lin_) 1/2 1/2 1/2 Compressor No/Type 1 /Gimatutf Scroll Outdoor Sound Rating (dB)° 84 Outdoor Coil .Type Lanced Tube Size (in.) OD 0.3125 Face Area (sti ft) 8.81 Rows/FPI 2/17 63,100 10.20/- 2,0002,000 60,000 6.78 72,000 — /10.2" 4400/2,100 69,000 6,77 Low Medium'' High Low Medium" High 60,000 80,000 130,000 80,000 120,000 150,000 48,000 64.000 104.000 64,800 97,200 121,500 81 81 80 81 81 81 81 61 80 81 81 81 2 2 3 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 4.6/14.0 4.6/14.0 10.0/14.0 10.0/14.0 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 12 3/4 indoor Coil -Type landed Tube Sue (in.) 0.3125 Face Area (so ft) 5.00 Rows/FPI 3/16 Retrigerent Control Short Orifice Drain Connection No/Size (in.) 1/4: NPT Outdoor Fan -'lope Propeller No. Used/Diameter (in,) 1/22 Dci./el'ype/No. Speeds Dlrect/1 CFM 3,470 No. Motors/HP 1/0.33 Motor RPM 1075 Direct Drive Indoor Fan -Type FC Centrifugal No. Used/Diameter (in.) 1/11 x 11e DriveType/No. Speeds Direct/2 No. Motors 1 Motor HP (Standerd/Overslzed) 090/1.00 Motor RPM (Standard/Oversized) 985/1,0809 Motor Frame Size (Standard/Oversized) 48/48 RT- PRC006-EN b0 39tid 1 /Climatutf Scroll 1/Climatuff Scroll 84 88 Lanced Lanced 0.3125 0.3125 8.81 13.88 2/17 2/17 Lanced Lanced 0.3126 0.3125 5.00 9.49 3/16 2116 Short Orifice Short Orifice 1/3/4 NPT 1//a NPT Propeller Propellor 1/22 1/26 Direct/1 Direct/1 3.470 6.100 1/0.33" 1/0.70" 1,075 1,075 FC Centrifugal WA 1/11 x 11° N/A Direct/2 N/A 1 N/A 0.90/1.00' N/A 985/1,080' N/A 48/48 NIA 17 NOIlOndiSNO0 NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZP OE :8T S00Z /L0 /i0 Dimensional Data All dimensions are in inches /millimeters. 3, 4, and 5 Ton Standard Efficiency — Low and Medium Heat 3 and 4 Ton High Efficiency — Low and Medium Heat SIAPOHAYOH SECTION ACCESS PANEL (3 - ! i Tons) TOP PAN; L CONOENSLHFAN 4 14' 1u6 32 /4' 019 AIM ALTERNATE CONDENSATE DRAIN -` CONNECTION 314.14 NPT DIA. HOLE 230/19' 525 MME B97/11' 431/4' 1r /9MM 1077MM '108MMh /` 6 4/1r 141 MM 14i MM tl 641' 244MAI 1/2 NPT CAS CONNECTION 3, 4, and 5 Ton Standard Efficiency —High Heat 3 and 4 Ton High Efficiency — High Heat 5 Ton — High Efficiency — Low, Medium, and High Heat 86 S0 39Vd EVAPORATOR SECTION ACCESS PANEL 7 Ii/ 114 MN ! M 1124 MM CONTROL AND COMPRESSOR ACCESS PANEL TOP P4NI I. - CONDENSER COIL UNIT CONTROL WIRE 7/B' (22MM) Da. NOL1 ---_____SERVICE GAUGE PORT ACCESS 1 314' (35144) DA. HOLE UNITPOWERW4iE 1 3152' (28MM) OA MOLE ••• CONUILNSEH FAN 38 14• 921 MN 4 114' 104 MM ALTERNATE CONDENSATE DRAIN - CONNECTION 34 -14 NPT 01A, HOLE \ ` 09 7!9' 42 u4' 1770 MM 1073 MM 1/2 NPT GAB CONNtCI ION NOIlDfl 1SN00 NNIHO 4 1I4"..,. 10860.E 6 9/16' 141 MM CONTROL ANU COMPRESSOR ACCESS PANEL 75/4' 194697 44 I /4' 1124 MM ----CONDEN0ER COIL --- or( CONnioL WIRE 7T'D2►94)DIA.HOLE SERVICE GAUGE PORT ACCESS 1 319' (2649.0 DI► HOLE UNIT POWER WIRE . 1 3152' f11MM) OIA. HOLE RT-PRC006EN 5880- 868 -SZt PE:8T S00Z /L0 /t0 All dimensions are in inches/millimeters. 6 Ton Standard and High Efficiency 71 Ton Standard Efficiency EVAPORKI014 SECTION ACCESS PANEL ALTERNATE CONDENSATE DRAIN CONNEC1ION 3/4 - 1a NPT DIA. HOLE`' Dimensional Data TRANS- (6 - 1(1Tons) 1OP PANEL • CONDENSER FAN f 40 710 1030 MM 4811- - 81MM 27 6/8 • 701 MM ■ 771B 28 0/ 11'10 b 6' 2281 MM 12 NPT 12A9 CONNECTION (80 18811. 120 min); 5 a NPT CAB CONNECTION (100 111611, 200 1011, 250 m00) 71/2 Ton High Efficiency 81/2 and 10 Ton Standard and High Efficiency EVAPORATOR SECTION ACCESS PANEL AI:ILNNATE CONDENSATE GRAIN CONNECTION :V4. 14 NPT 01A. HOLE a 5/0 244 MM 6 6/6 14.3 MM // CONTROL AND COMPRESSOR ACCESS PANEL a1 /4 08104 •���— UNIT POWER WIRE 1 3/8' (362414) OIA 140LE ----"'---- CONDENSER COIL •~— UNIT CONTROL WIRE T /8' (22MMj DIA HOLE SERVICE CAUOE PORT ACCESS 13/8' (36414) D1A. HOLE 66/8 0a3 MM 7 6/8 1841414 55 1 /4' 1305 MM TOP PANEL CONDENSEN PAN ad 710' 1100 t.1* 4 14 1001441-1 41 Mr 80 S8. 1218 rl 2251 1*M 1!1 NvT (Al' CONNECTION 0100. 120 mon): 5/4 NPT CA5 CONNlCTlON (tau mon. 700 mon, 255 4154) ��— CONDENSER CON. UNIT CONTROL WIRE 7)0• SCUM) DY. HOLE `SERVICE 04//OE PORT ACCESS 1 7/0• (381044) 0LL. NOLL' UNIT POw€P W010 1 3/0• (14001*) 01A HOLE C0NTn01,ANOCOMPRESSOR ACCESS PANEL Rf PRC006.EN 90 39tid NOIlOnNISNO0 NNIHO 89 9880- 868 -Si;t' PE :81 5002/L0/T0 Weights Table W.1 — Maximum Unit And Comer Weights (Lbs) And Center Of Gravity Dimensions (In.) Unit MaximumVWights (LbsF CornerWeights (Lbe)' Tons Model No. Shipping Net A B C D Length Width 3 YSC0364 572 480 151 124 96 YHC0384 589 497 158 128 101 4 YSC3>48A 597 506 159 130 108 YHA 631 539 166 133 114 5 YSC0604 614 522 • 169 134 105 Y110360A 666 574 179 140 119 6 YS0077A 878 735 249 193 132 YHC072A 915 772 249 198 141 Y5C090A 983 820 273 208 146 71/2 YSC092 965 822 277 222 147 1110392A 1066 923 306 243 166 Er/2 YSC102A 1042 839 297 243 166 YHC102A 1100 957 310 252 175 10 YSC1204 1063 958 317 261 177 YHC1204 1203 1060 342 277 197 Center of Gravity (In.) 109 32 19 110 32 19 109 33 19 126 32 20 114 32 18 136 32 20 161 39 21 184 39 22 133 38 22 175 a0 21 210 39 22 194 41) 21 220 40 22 202 41 21 245 40 22 Nt 1. Ccrner weigh?; are (liven for inlormatwn only. 2. vveionts are approximate. 94 L0 3E$id CENTER OF GRAVITY -a- LENGTH 11 CANTER OF GRAVITY WIDTH D CENTER OF GRAVITY Table W2 — Factory- installed Options Net Weights (LbsP Net Weight .lSTons 6- 10Tons Accuasory Economizer 26 36 Barometric Relief 7 10 Powered Exhaust — 80 Motorized Outside Air Damper 20 30 Manual Outside Air Damper 16 26 Hoof Curb 70 115 Oversized Motor 5 8 Bolt Drive Motor 31 Smoke Detector, Return 7 7 Smoke Detector; Supply 5 5 Cal Guards 12 20 Hinged Doors 10 12 Powered Convenient) Outlet 38 38 Through tho Base Electrical 8 13 Through the Base Gas 5 5 Unit Mounted Circuit Breaker 5 5 Unit Mounted Dlaconncct 5 6 Nover Control 8 8 Dehumidification (Hot Gas Reheat) Coil 15 25 NOM: 1. Walphts lot ap tions not liztcn aro < 5 ILY. 2.Netwelpni Moult, Ire ended to unit wciphtwhen of ]ariny lactoryrnra IIod Occousories. R1 PRC006 -EN NOIlOnaSNOO NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZO bE :BT 5002 /L0 /T0 80 39tid Packaged Gas/Electiic Rooftop Units VoyagerTM 121/2 - 25Tons — 60 Hz July 2004 RT PRC001 -EN NOIlOnal.SNO0 NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZt bE :81 S00Z /L0 /I0 Table GD-1 - General Data (121& 15 Ton) General Data Stanch rd Efficiency 4 Cooling Perfortnenoe' Grose Cooling Capacity EEFP (Downfow/Horaontal) Nominal CFM /AN Rated CFM ARI Net Cooling Capacity Integrated Part Load Value' System Power (KW) Hooting Pinforrtranae 121/2Ton Dowrrtlow and Horizontal Units YC•15003,D4,DWL DK YC-15003,04,DWH, DK 150.000 9.6 5,000/4,400 142,000 10.3 14.79 15Ton Downflow 11nd Horizontal-Units YC•180B3,B4,BWL, 8K YC-18063,B4,BWH, BK 18:.000 !I 7 6,00(1'5,300 174 000 11.0 1',' ..34 Heating Models Low High Low Heating Input (Btuh) 150,000 250,000 260,000 1st Stage 100,000 175,000 175,000 Heating Output (Btuh) 122.000 203.000 203.000 1st Stage 81,000 142,000 142,000 ARJE (%)a (Downtlow/Horizontal) 81.0 80.7/79.9 80.7 / 79.9 Steady State Efficiency (%) 81.0 81.0 81.0 No. Burners 1 No. Stages 2 Gas Supply Pressure (in, w.c) Natural or LP (minimum/maximum) 2.5/14.0 2.5, 4.0 Gas Connection Pipe Site (in.) 1f2 Compressor No/Type Sound Rating (BELS)` Outdoor Coll -Type Tube Size (in.) OD Face Arab Isq h) Rows/FPI Indoor Coil -Type Tube Size (in.) Fact Area (aq fd Rows/FPI Refrigerant Control Drain Connection No./Size (in.) Outdoor Fen -Type No. Used/Diameter (in.) Drive Type/No. Speeds CFM No. Motors/HP Motor RPM Indoor Fan -Type No, Used/Diameter (In.) DriveType/No. Speeds No. Motors Motor HP (Standard/Oversized? Motor RPM (Standard/Oversized? Motor Frame Size (Standard /Oversized)' Fibers -Type Furnished (No.) Slav Recommended 2/Climetuffe Scroll 9.2 Hi- Performance .375 24.18 2/16 Hi- Performance .375 17.5 7115 Short Orifice 1/1.00 NPT Propeller 0(r2/26 N 10.600 2/.50 1,100 FC Centrifugal 1/15X16 Balt/1 1 3.0/5.0 17409rt60 145T/145T 1/2 High 350,000 250,000 284,000 203,000 80.1 / 79.1 81.0 3/4 2/Trane 3-DO Scn ,II/Climatuff Scroll 9.2 Hi- Perfnnnance .3!5 2712 3/16 Hi- Perfr•1'mance .3 /5 17!10 2/(5 Short )riticc 1/1.0( NPT Props rller 2P6 Dirt . t/1 10,:'00 2/.s0 1,1110 FC Cow rifugai 1/15 15 Bell /1 3.0;' i.0 1740,' 450 1467,1467 Throw ■weya Downiow (2) 20 X 20 X 2, (4)20 X 25 X 2 (2) 20 X 20 X 2, (4)20 X 25 X 2 Horizontal (2)20 X20X 2,(4120 X 25 X2 (2) 20 X 20X.2, t4)20 X 25 X 2 Behigerent Charge Was of R•22)' Ndtae: 1. COOlirlO 1'en'Onitelv:e trod at9b-F arncle•Y, 60 °F entering dry bulb. rd -F enterinv wet bulb. Greso eef,aoty slues net inctuJo the olives of Ian motor heat erect of tan motor hoer. Unit; are aui al.le :v) wetetion to :20% of nominal ern). Certified in anrordenue wit!' the unitary Largo aquipfr:ent cerdieanon Of 340/.36043. 2. EER io rated tat ARI coldltiol'I$ end in ac crearce with AMI Standard 210/240 or 300, 3, Integrated Ps: Load vatuo rated in accordei.ce with AR1 Standard 210/24o or 360. Units aro rated at Elov 90•P °mono div Lao, o.-1 6 rF en 4. Heating Performance /n'nt 9e ttin6c and rating data weld estaditarled one approved under leber story toot conai Pons usitip American National Standurd: In6 eluvattens uo to 2000 Islet. Far elovorions;oove 2000 roes. ratings should be reduced et the rate of 4% for a4Cr11000 teat above rme lovei - 0. AFUE is fated in acCardonCe with DOE test piol:edura:. o. Suund nallrng Shown 19 teeteJ In ac_crd.:nra with AhI Standard 270 Or 370. 7. Refrigerant charge is an approximate value. °er a: 1) Cie 1:22,622 valu4, See unit narnepla(a and :Inr,ic)nirjt:uw):. 8. An oc Bonet 2 inch planted titter is eine a•.ertebra. 9. For 3e0V/tiOHZ unite, the overused mtper is sod as 'pa ataildaiJ )tutor. Clef °r t0 overaI2ail )enter data. 9,3/9,4/Circuit 17.59,5 Circuit - Indujtes both downtivw and huri.Cntar units. 14 60 3917d • lh -I capacity u not aria includes the 'Tan". which le based Of) ARI Standard Ig tool bulb at Ai11 rated ern. rule 5tbnderdc. fittings OI'lowr) die for RTPRC001 -EN NOIlOndiSNOO NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZb bE :8T 5002 /L0 /T0 • All dimensions are in inches. None: Duct flanges mount 7- 7/16" down inside the curb on the 1 -1/2" curb flanges. See recommended duct dimensions on the net page. Roofi utb is intended for downflow use only 58 Dimensional 121/2 T m High Efficiency' cy' Data 12 3/2 15, 17"Y2 Ton ;sanciaard Efficiency MTEH ACCESS DOW HORIZON I Al ONLY DOMNFL0 CONDENSATE ORAIN CONNEC1Iuh 1,0C NPT r a. • 71 a /10' o7 � /1c' 1/2° NP1' CAS NLCI \ (n •1808 -n - S/A NPT) 6 (TC•210C••11 - 1/4 H.r) '00 1 1/2' PERIMETER CURB FLANGE 66 6/e' 11.416. i 207/6. :ice •'• 1� 'U17 /6' / 7 /d' NCLC (UNIT CONTROL WIREi) 7p 13 /1G• SERv�CE C%•uCl• PORT ACCEra HOLE (UNIT POWER WIRES) • , Downflow Unit Clearance CLEARANCE 68' 102114' 7 1/2' / •C_7/ DOWNFLOW - 36 1 67' 1– UNIT OU I L1NE CLEARANCE FROM TOP OF UNIT 72' 1/ ?' ROOF �_L7PENINC —� 73 1 /2' CLEARANCE 60' I 39 c1 NOI1OrldiSNOO NNIHO 62 CLEARANCE 42' RT- PRC001 -EN 5880- 868 -SZt VE:8t SOOZ /LO /I0 DEC-21-04 03152PM FROV- AirTec Lob Name: AVIS RENTAL Location: SEA TAC '.Ref. Date: 12 -21-04 Z06- 763 -1850 T -804 P.002/006 F-270 • Engineer. CFM HTG. & CLG. Contractor: CFM HTG. & CLG. Add'I Info: Job Fite: avis jf CFM Tag Qty Model Drive Flow SP . _. RpM _... wwari Sone Power HP Voltage/Ph Type nccessorles /Notes 1 CR8n44 belt 23.000 0.250 468 184 1919 5 208l230M6oV 3PH OPEN . 1 CRDA12 dImct 964 0.250 1025 5.8 0488 1/8 115V 1PH OPEN 1 CRDA12 direct 964 0.250 1024 + ' 5.8 0.096 118 119V1PH OPEN 1 CRDA13 Otict 1,300 0.250 994 8.9 0.137 VS 115V 1PH OPEN TT 39Vd NOIlOf1N1SNO0 NNIHO FanSELECT V, 4.1.0 5880- 868 -SZP PE:8T S00Z /L0 /T0 DEC -21 -04 03 :52PM FRQM1- AirThc Type CRBA Belt Drive Centrifugal Power Roof Ventilator AlNPRlCant COOLttitR CORPORATION Accessories TAG: BOW 206 -763 -1950 7-604 P.003/006 F -270 • A so. ID. 0 C 56 I 71 114 1 49 • No overloodtng aluminum what! CON puter Delattced • For ventdated motor compartment %eoleled from ainnream - Vanabre pitch :rioter pull y Ij ▪ Vibration isolators on &rie frame • ore.onorproot spun aluminum hot. wn® - NEr4A Standard open drip•proof motors • Overlappin0 wM /inlet venlurl . Heavy duly ntif I4gning pillow - block bearings wlI i cast Non hourin8 . 1T' galvanized mean brdscreen - Ut. Listed for Standard 706 (most moolal3) 1 DimMions d1 leans wile= *thermic* noted C laCLI carrinED Rama CIS uwawnoo HlunuT.A.c.. wC. Tio Speed: 5.529 ft/min Outlet Velocity: 1 A96 ft/rnin Fan Data Motor Data Accossorlos Qty Modal No. CFM InWg RPM -BHP MHP RPM Voltage/Ph Hz End. _ 1 CRBM4008353 23,000 0.250 469 3.99: 5 1750 20800/460V 3PH 60 OPEN Sones LwA dBA X68. dBA X62 , dBA �g6 Octave Band Sound Powor (LwA) 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz f 5005Nz 11100 Hz J 2006 Hz 4000 Hz rB005 �t 18,4 79 PROJECT LOCATION SEA TAG SUBMITTED SY AIR TEC COMPANY APPROVED BY 1 .f 0 man P' re°renal Curve • 1.0 0 0.73 0,50 0.23 0.00 ..... _- ,_- :ae.s_ - - _- ___....._. 0 3.000 101300 15,000 20.000 2DJ)00 NAmlurn e FIOw Race (CFM) ENGINEER CFM HTG. & CLG. -- l AVI$ RENTAL Z.( 39tid 5 4 2 1 30.000 CONTRACTOR CFM HTQ. &. LG. DATE 12/21 /2004 DATE Fan6ELECT v, 4,1,0 NOIlOndiSNOD NNIHD 5880- 868 -SZV VE:BT S90Z /L9 /T9 IEC -21 -04 03:52PM FROM-Ai rTec TAG: Type CRDA Direct Drive Centrifugal Power Roof Ventilator 19 DA. AMERICAN COOLAIR CORPORATION Accessories 206- 763-1850 T -804 P.004/006 F -270 i. •.. •- -- - - - - - -- A 0 C I 23 1 28 518 1 161/2 1 A SO. 1.0 Tip Speed: 3.505 ft/min 1 Dimensions In owners unless otherwise noted • rl0novericadlny ?dumintun - .-lnYel computer balanced • 1'arca ventilated motor romparttnent ISOtatea tram the 1 •zlratream • ,tioratlon Isolators on ones frame • ■Neatherproof spun aluminum housing NBA Standard Iramo olio :notes • i)ve(IDpping wheel/Inlet vanturl • :r'' sanranlzed meth nIrdscreen Factory counted and wired disconnect drvice • tJL Llsted tar Standard 705 (pmst models) Outlet Velocity: 288 ft /min ei. sAT Motor Data Accessories City Model No. FIN inWg RPM BHP MHP RPM VoltagelPh Hz Encl. 1000 54 1 CROAl2£1073115 t 964 0.250 1025 0.098 1/8 1025 115V 1PH 80 OPEN Songs LwA • =r ( 5' •1- ►• ig 10' • - € 20' Octave Band Sound Power LwA) 63 z ' 250 ' r� ' 57 1000 54 r ` 51 • 00 • z 46 _r,r.1 ' c_ r 5.8 62 50 44 38 70 71 65 0.7 0.6 0.� 0.4 0.J 0.2 0.1 • Pram Pvrformanc• Cur∎re • • - i - --- -- -- 1 ! ' 0175 • 0.150 •• •!•0125 0.100 • • 0 075 0023 0 0 - -- 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1.6 00 voiUrr1 e Firma R ar (C FiM) PROJECT AVIS RENTAL LOCATION SCA TAC SUBMITTED BY AIR TEC COMPANY APPROVED BY E t 39tid ENGINEER CFM MTG. & CLG. CONTRACTOR CFM HTG. & DATE 12/21/2004 DATE farsSELSCr •.4.1.0 NOI.0f1NISNOO NNIHO 5889- 868 -SZD tE :81 S00Z/L0/10 DEC -21 -04 03:52Pfd FRO14 -Ai rTec Type CRDA Direct Drive Centrifugal Power Roof Ventilator AMERICAN COOLA1R CORPORA lON Accessories TAG: 206 -763 -1950 T -804 P.005/006 F -270 I 1 �. ASR LD J s H C 23 [211 5/8 1 16112 TID Speed: 3.505 ft/min Dimonsiona in mews unless canard's* noted 1 Shim of • Nan - overloading aluminum ovheel aestivate balanced • Fared ventilated mater ' mportfttant isolated rtom iha sdrso•arn dlprallon Fsouttors on time rrsinno • Weatherproof spun aluminum doll Ling • wEh a Standard frame size motaes Overlapping wheel/inlet venturl • tr' Qalvanized itterllh ill rdrereen • i'aouay mounted and wired Jlsconnoct device - LJL Listed ter Standard 705 mesa modals) Outlet Velocity; 2$8 ft/min 1.L • L'L • OLl■ h C n Data Motor Data Accessories 4ty Modal No. CFM inWg ' RPM B HP IM P RPM Voltage/Ph ' HZ Encl. • _ I 1 CRDA12E10D1151 884 0.250 1025 098 118 1025 115V 1P14 80 OPEN Sones LwA dBA 0 5. . 50 dEtA 5' 10• - .4 dBA 6 20' 38 Octave Band Sound Power (LwA) 8000 Hz 37 63 Hz 70 1 1-25 Hz , 1 71 250 -Hz 65 500 Hz T7000 Hz-206O 57 1 54 Az 4000 Hz S1 —r 45 5.8 62 PROJECT LOCATION SUBMITTED BY APPROVED BY b i 39tid Fan socrformanoo Curve 0.0 0 250 SO0 750 AVIS RENTAL • 1,000 Vol um et Flow Rare (CFM) ENGINEER SEA TAC AIR TEC COMPANY 1,250 1 0175 0150 0.125 0100 0.075 0050 0.025 0.000 1.500 pFM HTG. & CLG. CONTRACTOR CFM HTG. & CLG. DATE 12/21/2004 DATE FonseLscr 4.1A NOIl3f8ISNOD NNIHD 5880- 868 -SZP 0£:8T S00Z /L0 /i0 DEC -21 -0d 03:52PM FROM- Al rTec io063 -1950 T-6D4 P.UU6 /Ullb F -CIu Type CRDA D;rect Drive Centrifugal Power Roof Ventilator INN AMERICAN COODUR CORPORATION Accessories TAG: B L A SQ. I.D. ( 4 A C Oimamicns In inches l 23 28518 1 16112 ] unless othtawiao noted :ittout at • Non -0verIoading atuminurn .heel computer balanced • Force ventilated motor compartment isotate's rrom the airstream • Vlortnlan Isolators on drive name • Weatherproof spun atuminurn housing . NEMA Standard frame size mOlers • ovvltlpPing wheel/Inlet venturl • 112 galvanized mesh blfdscreen • Factory mounted and wired di5tonnev1 device I • UL Listed for Standard 705 (most motielat 1 2' Tip Speed: 3.708 ft/min Outlet Velocity: 401 tVmin Ji• Al: 0.•. 111C1 611i0/1 u1.,•4.17..1•0., .10. Fan Data Meter Data Model No. • CFM inWg1 RPM CRDA13F1101151 1,300 0.250 '994 BHP 0137 MHP 115 RPM Valtaga/P11 1125 115V 1PH Hz Ercl. 80 OPEN - Acceo9orles Sores LwA • B s dBA + 10 • = • ., M ■ 1• ZV Octave Band Sel-9_r_ Power ;LwA} - ,,w 1_, .— 9.711 417 - .. re, . ..con. n 7. - •" .�... •.• • - ... 6.9 _ 65 53 47 41 I 72 1 74 J 68 1 60 ( 5e J 54 1-- 4d 40 1 PROJECT Su6MIrr El') jpT APPROVED BY ST 39tid 0.2 0,1 1 Fin per re'v I'M 'II rip 0dar Guru• I � I 1 1 --------- - -- ; 4- - 250 SOU 750 1.000 1,250 N/101 um e Flow Re[d1 (CF PA) • 1.s00 0.175 0110 0125 0:100 •01175 0E125 01100 1.,50 AVIS RENTAL ENGINEER CFM HTG. & CLG. AIR TEC COMPANY a s "FM HTG. & CLa. DATE 12/21/2004 DATc FyiCT v. 4,1,0 NOI101b1SNOO NNIHO 5880- 868 -SZV VE:81 S00Z /L0 /10 TSI Transportation'Solutions, Inc. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT October 2004 Prepared for: Cendant Car Rental Company Prepared by: Transportation Solutions, Inc. 8250 - 165th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT October 2004 Prepared for: Cendant Car Rental Company Prepared by: Transportation Solutions, Inc. 8250 - 165th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 1 STUDY PROCESS AND ORGANIZATION 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STREET NETWORK 6 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PATTERNS 6 EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE 7 PLANNED STREET IMPROVEMENTS 9 TRANSIT SERVICE, PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACTIVITY 9 FORECASTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 11 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE PROJECT 11 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS WITHOUT THE PROJECT 12 PROJECT GENERATED TRAFFIC 12 Trip Generation 12 Trip Distribution and Travel Assignment 15 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT 15 Level of Service Analysis with the Project 15 CONCLUSIONS/ MITIGATION 19 TRIP GENERATION 19 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE 19 POSSIBLE MITIGATION 19 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP 2 FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN 3 FIGURE 3: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8 FIGURE 4: FUTURE 2005 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITHOUT THE PROJECT 13 FIGURE 5: DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIPS 16 FIGURE 6: FUTURE 2005 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH THE PROJECT 17 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: ANTICIPATED STAFFING LEVELS 4 TABLE 2: LOS CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 7 TABLE 3: LOS CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 9 TABLE 4: TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE 14 TABLE 5: LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 15 INTRODUCTION This report examines the traffic impacts associated with the redevelopment of the Lewis and Clark Theater and Bowl to the regional administrative offices and rental car maintenance facility for the Cendant Car Rental Company (Avis and Budget Car Rental Companies) in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to identify traffic related impacts that would be generated by the proposed redevelopment and to outline programs and/or physical improvements to minimize or eliminate the effects of these impacts. This analysis follows generally accepted traffic and transportation planning procedures used by the Cities of Tukwila and SeaTac. Project Location and Description The redevelopment site is located in Tukwila on the southerly boundary with the City of SeaTac. More specifically, the site is situated in the southeast quadrant of interchange between SR -99 (Tukwila International Boulevard) and SR- 518.-The site is bounded on the south by S. 160th and on the west by SR -99 (Tukwila International Boulevard. An existing Dollar Car Rental facility, hardware store, barbershop, and restaurant located in the northeast quadrant of the S. 160th Street/SR -99 intersection will remain intact. These businesses have independent access that will not be shared with the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the Maintenance Facility. al_ sitels_currently_occupied -6y -a- seven- screen-multiplex`einemaand =a 36= lanebowling� lle-y.,_botli- of-which -have ceased operations .m.the_past- six_to twelvemonths: If market conditions were stronger, these facilities could be reopened. As for existing conditions, the site is proposed to be served by two access drives. The first is a split driveway off SR -99 that serves right turns in and right turns out only. The second driveway is a two - way driveway off S. 160th Street approximately 650 feet east of the signalized intersection of S. 160th Street at SR -99. The site plan is shown on Figure 2. The proposed Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility will provide mechanical maintenance for the Avis and Budget Car Rental fleets in Washington. Services at this facility will include mechanical repair and programmed maintenance including oil changes and lubrication. While there will be fueling, washing, vacuuming, and cleaning of cars when they are undergoing repair or program maintenance, topping off of fuel, fluids, and routine cleaning and washing normally occur at the retail outlets where clients rent individual cars. Body and painting work will occur elsewhere. Operations at this site can be thought of in terms of three different functional activities: 1) regional administrative offices, 2). shuttle driver operations, and 3) maintenance and repaii B'ased on hght-mainten h operations_at_existinh Avis and - Budget- Gar- Rental"light_opeeaiioris' elsewhere, these rental, companies service an average of 300 carson_an_average we� ekday� basis. Table 1 summarizes the employment that is associated with each of these segments of the operation. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 1 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. Figure 1 Vicinity Map Cendant Car Rentals awe • m.o,an MGR mo PO* A iD) YSM? MD Ol - arxvwa' T I TransportaI.e7 onnSolutions, Inc. Figure 2 Site Plan Cendant Car Rentals Table 1: Anticipated Staffing Levels Position Day Shift Swing Shift Total Administration Managers 16 4 20 Staff 6 4 10 Shuttle Operation Van Drivers 5 -6 1 -2 6 -8 Shuttle Drivers 35 -40 5 -10 40 -50 Maintenance Mechanics 4 -6 2 -3 6 -9 Oil Changers 2 -5 1 -2 3 -7 Service Agents 2 2 4 Regional administrative staff for both Avis and Budget Car Rental companies will be consolidated in the concessions portion of the existing cinema building. This office will employ up to 35 persons based at the facility and will include District Managers, City Managers, Airport Managers, a Fleet Manager, a Sales Manager, a Human Relations Manager and receptionist, and a sales staff. While the shuttle driver operation would be managed out of this office, the trip making activity for this component is different than typically associated with the rest of the administrative office staff and is therefore considered separately. Shuttle driver operations involve rental cars being shuttled between the maintenance facility and car rental offices throughout the region. Between 70% and 80% of the shuttle activity is generated by SeaTac Airport car rental operations. The remaining 20% to 30% percent of vehicles are shuttled from offices throughout the area with Seattle and Bellevue offices being the most active. Vehicles transport to or from Spokane, eastern Washington, and other destinations are often served by transport trucks. Shuttle drivers will be based at the site. They arrive in staggered shifts from at 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM and are typically transported in groups of 6 to 8 drivers in vans to retail rental offices where they pick up cars that need mechanical repair or program maintenance and drive them back to the maintenance facility. Shuttle drivers then either return to a rental office with a car that has been repaired at the maintenance facility or ride in a van to another retail office to pick up another car. Throughout the day there is a regular exchange of cars as drivers are shuttled back and forth in the rental cars and vans. The morning shift typically ends the day between 2:30 PM and 5:00 PM. A smaller shift of drivers that arrives at about 2:30 PM shuttles cars through 11:30 PM. Maintenance operations would occur out of the existing bowling alley building. The light maintenance operation involves mechanics, oil changers, and service agents. The staff for this component is scheduled over two basic shifts. The day shift is staggered and Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 4 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. starts between 6:00 AM and 8:30 AM and ends between 2:30 PM and 5:00 PM. A smaller swing shift is also staggered and starts about 2:30 PM and extends to 10:00 PM. Study Process and Organization The process used in preparing this traffic analysis follows a generally accepted approach and conforms to the general format and intent of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) guidelines. This report is formatted to first discuss existing traffic conditions, which provides a framework or reference for the remainder of the analysis. Next, future conditions without the project are forecasted to establish a baseline against which to measure the project specific traffic related impacts. Finally, project - generated traffic is forecasted and superimposed on non - project traffic to evaluate the incremental and cumulative impacts precipitated by the project. Where a reasonable probability of a significant adverse impact is identified, mitigation measures will be suggested for consideration. Impacts are assessed in two ways in this analysis. First, the traffic impact on traffic operations is evaluated against the existing traffic volume because the theater rand= bwling_alley. have-been-closed- for -six to -l2- months- and - their cumulative traffic volume is not reflected by existing traffic counts. Since 70 %o to of the volume generated by this facility is already generated by the retail Avis and Budget operations in the area, this analysis has been confined to the immediate area of the site. Second, the impact associated with the area -wide road network is assessed in terms of the net new trips (Cendant trips less theater/bowling alley trips) generated by this development. Net new trips generated by the project would impact intersections further from the site and could be subject to traffic impact fees. g‘L CJ Lac, Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 5 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. EXISTING CONDITIONS This section of the report describes the existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the project, including a description of the street network, traffic volumes, and traffic operations in the area. This discussion serves as a basis for subsequent analysis of forecasted traffic conditions. Street Network The street network in the immediate vicinity of the project site is typical of a high - density suburban highway with strip commercial uses located along the highway's frontage. Even though the subject property is within the City of Tukwila, operation of the road network adjacent to the site is the responsibility of the City of SeaTac. This designation of responsibility along a common city boundary line is typical. Specific characteristics of key streets are described below. Figure 3 illustrates the local street network in the immediate vicinity of the site. Tukwila International Boulevard (SR -99) is a six lane Principal Arterial that historically served as the regional and interstate spine through Western Washington. At intersections with major cross streets like S. 160th Street, SR -99 widens to include additional turn lanes. This road serves a variety of highway commercial uses. Sidewalks are available along both sides of the street. The name of this street changes to International Boulevard south of the site and, in several areas of unincorporated King County, is Pacific Highway South. S. 160th Street is a two -lane road that connects the North Entry drive at the site to SeaTac Airport. This street also connects Klickitat Drive to the west and the Southcenter Commercial area to the east. Adjacent to the site, the roadway is channelized to provide two travel lanes in each direction. Sidewalks run along both sides of the street in the vicinity of the site. SR -518 is a four lane limited access freeway that connects the interchange of I -405 and I- 5 on the east with SR -509 on the west. SR -518 connects with International Boulevard via a series of ramps that function similar to a grade separated interchange. The road widens in the vicinity of International Boulevard to provide added capacity for traffic turning on and off the road to International Boulevard and the North Entry and Exit Drives serving SeaTac Airport. Traffic Volumes and Patterns The scope of this traffic analysis was determined to be very limited because the net new traffic volume generated by the redevelopment of this site represents a net loss in traffic volume. Because many of the vehicles generated by the proposed maintenance facility use the same streets now as they travel between the retail sites at the airport and the Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 6 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. existing maintenance sites that are further away from the site, the traffic operations analysis focused on the intersection of International Boulevard at S. 160th Street. PM peak period turning movement volume data was collected for this intersection in October 2004. The weekday PM peak hour is used since it generally represents the time period where the combination of project - generated and background traffic volumes are expected to be at their maximum value and present the greatest potential for traffic impacts. During the weekday PM peak hour, traffic volumes on International Boulevard adjacent to the project site reach approximately 2,470 vehicles per hour (vph). Volumes are almost evenly spit between northbound and southbound flow at this location. S. 160th Street carries about 860 vph during the PM peak hour. Figure 3 illustrates the peak hour turning movements. Because the existing cinema and bowling alley are not currently operating, traffic counts at the site driveways were not made. Nonetheless, their impact is assessed in terms of the trip generation associated with the net change in the redevelopment. Existing Level of Service To evaluate the operation of intersections under different traffic volume conditions, an analysis typically referred to as intersection level of service was used. Existing PM peak hour level of service (LOS) was calculated for the identified intersections using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, Special Report 209) methodology. This procedure evaluates the intersection operation considering traffic control, lane channelization, and character of the traffic volumes. The level of service for unsignalized intersections, such as the site driveways, is defined in terms of control delay for the controlled movements. The seconds of delay are classified into categories, or grade levels, ranging from LOS -A, which is excellent, to LOS -F, which reflects a breakdown in traffic flow. The level of service presented in this analysis for unsignalized intersections does not reflect the level of service for the intersection as a whole, but rather for the most congested movement. Table 2 below is a summary of the criteria for LOS of unsignalized intersections. Table 2: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections LOS Average Control Delay (s /veh) A 0 -10 B > 10 -15 C > 15 -25 D > 25 -35 E > 35 -50 F > 50 Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 7 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. TSI Transportation Solutions, Inc. /7" • Figure 3 2004 PM Peak Hour Volume Cendant Car Rentals The driveways off S. 160th and International Boulevard were analyzed as unsignalized intersections. The intersection of S. 160th Street at International Boulevard is signalized. This intersection is evaluated in terms of the criteria illustrated in Table 3. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Description Average Vehicular Service Stopped Delay (seconds) A Very low delay; most vehicles do not stop at _< 10 intersection. B Generally good progression or short cycle length; more 10 to 20 vehicles forced to stop. C Fair progression or longer cycle length; significant 20 to 35 number of vehicles stop. D Congestion becomes noticeable; individual cycle failures 35 to 55 occur; longer delays and longer cycle length; most vehicles stop. E Usually considered limit of acceptable delay; indicates 55 to 80 poor progression, long cycle length, and/or high volume - to- capacity ratio. Cycle failures are frequent. F Excessive delay; frequently indicates demand exceeding > 80 capacity. The existing levels of service at the analyzed intersections were calculated for the PM peak hour. Because the site is not currently occupied with active uses, only the intersection of S. 160th at International Boulevard could be analyzed. The level of service analysis shows this intersection operates at LOS -C with an average vehicle delay of 25.1 seconds. Planned Street Improvements A review of the City of Tukwila and City of SeaTac Six Year Transportation Improvement Plans show that no major street improvements are planned within the immediate study vicinity that will affect capacity or routing of traffic. Transit Service, Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity The project site is served by public transit. Bus stops are located adjacent to the site on International Boulevard. Sidewalks exist along all major roads in the vicinity of the site. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 9 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. However, transit and non - motorized modes of transportation are not anticipated to play a major role in the operation of the project site. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 10 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. FORECASTED TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section of the report outlines the assumptions and steps taken to arrive at the projected future traffic conditions for the proposed development. It discusses the potential impacts of additional vehicular traffic near the site. The potential impacts associated with other transportation issues, such as safety and site access that relate to the day -to -day activity of the completed project, will also be discussed. \ 0 For the purpose of this analysis, 2005 was selected as the design year for forecasting future traffic conditions. By this time, it is anticipated that full demolition of the theaters and conversion of the concession building and bowling alley will have occurred, and any changes in the existing traffic patterns will have been established. To help ensure that potential impacts are accurately identified and evaluated, the following analysis reflects a "worst case" condition. For the purpose of this study, "worst case" is defined as reflecting an above average traffic volume within the reasonably expected range of traffic conditions. Forecasted traffic conditions on streets in the vicinity of the site are composed of three primary elements: 1. Existing peak hour traffic 2. Future non - project peak hour traffic 3. Forecasted project - generated peak hour traffic Existing traffic volumes were presented in Figure 3 and have been described in the existing conditions section of this report. Future non project traffic volumes represent the incremental increase in volumes, which are expected to occur between now and 2005 but have no direct relationship to the proposed compost development. Project - generated traffic volumes are those volumes that are expected to be generated by the operation of the Cendant maintenance facility. The sum of these three components result in a total 2005 forecasted traffic volume with the proposed site and reflects both project - specific and cumulative background traffic volumes. Future Traffic Volumes without the Project The proposed project is scheduled to be operating at its full capacity by the year 2005. To assure a conservative assessment of the incremental impact of the project traffic, a forecast of traffic conditions in 2005 without the project was developed as a baseline for impact assessment. Future non - project traffic is that traffic growth created by other developments in the site vicinity expected to be occupied between now and 2005 as well as general changes in traffic volumes and patterns that result from unrelated changes in travel habits. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 11 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. An annual growth rate of two percent per year was applied to the existing volumes of the local road network in the site vicinity. From the standpoint of intersection operations, the future background traffic volume forecast does not include the volumes generated by the multiplex cinema or bowling alley. Future traffic volumes without the proposed project are illustrated in Figure 4. Level of Service Analysis without the Project Level of Service calculations for 2005 traffic conditions without the project found the intersection of International Boulevard at S. 160th Street will operate at LOS C with an average vehicle delay of 25.5 seconds per vehicle. This forecasted level of service and delay varies little from that calculated for existing conditions. Project Generated Traffic This section of this report outlines the assumptions and steps taken to forecast future traffic conditions associated with the proposed retail development and discusses potential impacts of additional traffic on streets in the vicinity of the site. The process used for this follows a standard transportation planning approach for forecasting travel demand using the following steps: 1) Trip Generation — How many vehicles will make trips? 2) Trip Distribution — What are their origins /destinations? 3) Travel Assignment — What route will they take? Trip Generation An estimate of the site trip generation was prepared in two ways. First, the gross new trips anticipated to be generated by the new use were estimated. Second, the net new trips associated with the site were estimated to understand the net impact on the area - wide road network. The net new volume estimate is calculated by subtracting the trips generated by the existing use from the gross trips generated by the future use. Computation of traffic impact fees and other off -site mitigation should be based on net new trips. The trip generation forecast was primarily based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition. This is the most generally accepted source of trip generation information for various land uses. Because the Cendant Rental Car Maintenance Facility is a unique use and not cataloged in the Trip Generation �69v- M� Manual, the component uses were identified and used as the basis for the trip generation. %1 The population data for each user group was provided by Cendant. N,►`�� Since employee counts were the most-verifiable source of information, TSI used L l employees as the independent variable for forecasting the trip generation. As much as . possible, the trip generation rates were based on similar uses. For example, the administrative office trip generation was based on an office building use and the repair Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 12 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. 1-0 it S 154th Street North Site Driveway and SR -99 1 Street International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. S 160th Street South Site Driveway and S 160th St. S 162nd Street Figure 4 2005 PM Peak Hour Volume, Without Project Cendant Car Rentals facility trip generation was based on a light industrial use. The employee information was validated by comparing the Cendant estimates with the physical design and capacity of the proposed buildings on the site. To estimate the trip generation associated with the shuttle drivers, a combination of the employee population and the work shifts were integrated to determine the activity levels. For land uses not explicitly found in the Trip Generation Manual, trip rates were rounded up to ensure a worst -case condition. These forecasts exceeded the estimate of peak hourly trips provided by Cendant staff from observations at their existing maintenance facilities. This information and the trip generation associated with the previously active uses are summarized in Table 4. Table 4: Trip Generation Estimate Use Size Units PM Peak Peak Trips Trips Hour Hour Inbound Outbound Trip Rate Trips Existing Bowling Alley Multiplex Cinema Total 36 Lanes 3.541 127 45 83 7 Screens 13.642 95 57 38 223 102 121 Proposed Administrative Building 35 Employees 0.53 17.5 3 15 Shuttle Operations 55 Drivers 1.54 82.5 45 37 Maintenance Operations 18 Employees 0.55 9 1 8 Total 109 49 60 Net New Trip Generation -114 -53 -61 1. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition - only one sample 2. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition 3. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition — General Office Buildings 4. Estimated by TSI based on shift times of drivers 5. Estimated by TSI based on a review of shift times and Light Manufacturing uses Table 4 shows that the new facility is forecasted to generate 109 gross vehicles per hour (vph) during the PM peak hour. The directional split of trips will result in about 49 trips inbound to the site and 60 vehicles per hour outbound from the site. This trip generation may seem low considering the larger vehicle capacity on the site. It must be understood that most of the cars would be parked. The large capacity is necessary when new fleets are being brought into the site and before the existing used fleet is sold or turned back. Recognizing the site is currently permitted as a cinema and bowling alley, the net new trip generation was also forecasted. Because the seven - screen (2000 -seat) cinema and 36 -lane bowling alley are forecasted to generate 223 vph during the PM peak hour, the net new trip generation will be -114 vph during the PM peak hour. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 14 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc.. Trip Distribution and Travel Assignment The distribution and assignment of PM peak hour trips on the local road network is illustrated in Figures 5. This distribution was developed through discussions with Cendant, which indicated that 70% to 80% of the vehicles maintained at this facility will be vehicles generated by airport activity. Most of these vehicles are anticipate to use the same roads to travel into and out of the area to the Budget and Avis car rental maintenance facilities as current operations. Future trip lengths will be shorter once the proposed maintenance facility is constructed because the maintenance facility is closer to the airport than existing maintenance facilities. The trip distribution percentages were converted to vehicle volumes by multiplying the distribution percentage for each turning movement by the forecasted number of PM peak hour trip generation for each trip type. The assignment of project trips is illustrated in Figure 5. This shows the majority of traffic is oriented to and from the south. As a result, most of these vehicles are expected to use International Boulevard or cut over to the Airport access road. Future Traffic Volumes with the Project Level of Service Analysis with the Project To illustrate the future conditions with the project occupied, the project generated traffic volumes (Figure 5) were superimposed on the 2005 non - project traffic volumes (Figure 4), which results in the cumulative PM peak hour traffic volumes shown in Figure 6. LOS was calculated for S. 160th Street and International Boulevard Intersection and the driveways to illustrate operational characteristics with the project complete and fully operational. Existing and future without project LOS values are included for comparison in Table 5. Table 5: Level of Service Summary intersection International Boulevard & S 160th Street Right -Only Access & International Boulevard Full- Access & S 160th Street Existing 2004 Future Background 2005 Future with Project 2005 Type Delay LOS Type Delay LOS Type Delay LOS S 25.1 U - U - C - - S 25.5 U - U - C - - S 27.2 U 11.8 U 9.8 C B A S — Signalized Control U — Unsignalized Control Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 15 Traffic Impact Analysis October, 2004 Transportation Solutions, Inc. North Site Driveway and SR -99 00a- M 10-1 t- 3 10— • —27 18 ��r1io o c� r International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. Tr 0 29 L0 0— • -- 0 South Site Driveway and S 160th St. T I. ' TransportationkSolutions, Inc, S 158th Street.. IN: OUT: IN: OUT 25% 5% 40% 45% IN: OUT: • IN: OUT c ro 40% OUT: 20% SITE 35% 30% 4 N 25% 25% IN: OUT: IN: OUT: 60% 80% 60% 80% S 160th Street • S 161st Street IN OUT 0% 0% S 162nd Street a c cv Figure 5 Proposed Development PM Peak Hour Volume Cendant Car Rentals t_12 S. 154th Street S 154th Street North Site Driveway and SR -99 M 0 CO CO M Ps CO 03N O) M 000 r M Co) ti O/ International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. Oth Street S 162nd Street South Site Driveway and S 160th St. TSi TransportationaSolutions, Inc. Figure 6 2005 PM Peak Hour Volume, With Proposed Project Cendant Car Rentals Intersection Operations The signalized and unsignalized intersections in the immediate vicinity of the site will all operate at LOS C or better in the year 2005 with the project with less than 30.0 seconds of average vehicle delay. The site access drives of S. 160th and International Boulevard will operate at LOS B and LOS A respectively with the project complete and operating at full capacity. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 18 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. CONCLUSIONS/ MITIGATION The following summarizes the primary conclusions developed from the traffic analysis. Trip Generation The proposed Cendant car rental maintenance facility would generate approximately 109 gross vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. This is about half of the volume generated during the same period when the multiplex cinema and bowling alley were fully operational. Intersection Level of Service Even though the trip generation is less than when the current use was active, an analysis of the intersection operations was made to determine if there were any movements that substantially added to the congestion in the immediate site area. This analysis found the following: • The intersection of International Boulevard at S 160th currently operates at LOS -C and will continue to operate at LOS -C with or without the project during the PM peak hour. • The unsignalized driveways that serve the site will operate at LOS -B or better with or without the project. Possible Mitigation Since the PM Peak Hour level of service with or without the project will operate at a good level of service (LOS -C or better) with the full development and occupancy of the project and considering the PM peak hour trip generation is about half of the trip • generation associated with operation of the existing permitted use, no special mitigation appears to be warranted. Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility Page 19 October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. Appendix A: 2004 Existing Condition Level of Service Worksheet Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) 10/27/2004 Movement:: : : Yv -- :EBL 2 EBT; : :.EBR. WBL,.:_WBT ;,:WBR.::..NBU: :�: NBL�:. „NBT,�,.NBR:- _..8'13-, r..;rSBL :,SBT :,--,SBR..:•:. Lane Configurations _.. '�' ) . f. r +1� . 1f r Ideal Flow (vphpl). ,1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900•° :'1900: 1900 1900 1900 ::.1900" 1900 :. 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util: Factor 1..00 1.00 1 00 1 00 ;. 1 00 1.00 0 91 0:97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95. 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00: 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1626 1661 1671 1759 1495 1736 4941 3367 3471 1553 Fit Permitted ?_` 0.95 ;1.00 0-.-9$ - 1:097,.. 1.00; : 0.95 ` 1 00 0.95: 1.00:_ ; .1.00., Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1661 1671 1759 1495 1736 4941 3367 3471 1553 '.905 X60 94 Volume (vph) .: 64 :. 120 ::. 30 42 73::: 254 13 29 92 216 846 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj: Fiow(vph) 75 141 "'",.35 '`'.46 79' : 276 ? 14 31 :-963 •64 97. 227 `: 89f,': • 99 • RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 248 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 42 Lane Group Flow'(vph) 75 0 • '46 165 79 28.<;:. 0 45 1021 0 • 0 . 324: 891,:.:. 57 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 11% 11% 11% 8% 8% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type Split Split Perin Prot .: Prot Prot;;,. Prot : , Pemi Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases ; Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 14.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time'(s) 4 :0 X4:0. Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap'(vph) 236 241 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm,; v/c Ratio Uniform Delay; dl Progression Factor Incremental belay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service; - Approach Delay (s) 0.32 0.68 ::. 38.3 40:6 1.00 1.00 0.8'7 7:8 39.1 48.4 45.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.4 36.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.4 36.5 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.36 r40 40 40 40 :40 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 167 176 150 128. 1803 ,. 0.03 c0.04 0.03 c0.21 0 :02 0.28 0.45 0.18 0.35 0.57 41..6 42.4 41:3 :.. 44:0 25.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0:9 '1-.8 . 0.6 .., 1 7 1.3 3 42.5 44.2 41.9 45.7 26.7 42.4 27.5 6 23.0 52.1 52.1 23.0 52.1 52.1 .. 0.23 0.52 0.52 4:0 4.0: 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 774 1808. 809 c0.10 c0.26 0.04 ;.. 0.42 0.49 0.07 32:8 15.4- 11.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 -0:4 1.0` 0:2 33.2 16.4 12.1 C B B 20.2 2004 Existing Synchro 6 Report Transportation Solutions, Inc. Page 1 — HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) 10/27/2004 Movement:.:. Approach LOS Intersection ;Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle; Length <(s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis" Period (min) c Critical Lane Group J #1 I p L TNBT:NBR ,.,.SBU " 4, BT..... SBR. .t.. ; c 27.8'. 0.57 60.2% 15. HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 20.0 B 2004 Existing Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Appendix B: 2005 without Project Condition Level of Service Worksheet Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. - - HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) 10/26/2004 Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 4- EBL : - EBT EBR WBL WBT To 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00. 0.95 1.00 1.00 1626 1660 1671 1759 1495 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1626 1660 1671 1759 1495 '% NBU NBL, NBT 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1736 4941 0.95 1.00 1736 4941 NBR SBU, . SBL.^ SST SBR ++ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 3367 3471 1553 0.95 1.00 1.00 3367 3471 1553 Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) 65 122 31 43 74 259 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 76 144 36 47 80 282 0 11 0 0 0 254 76 169 0 47. 80 28 11% 11% 11% 8% 8% 8% Split , Split Perm 4 4 8 8 14.7 14.7 0.15 4.0 3.0 239 0.05 0.32 38.2 1.00 0.8 38.9 D 14.7 14.7 0.15 4.0 3.0 244 c0.10 0.69 40.5 1.00 8.2 48.7 D 45.8 10.1 10.1 0.10 4.0 3.0 169 0.03 0.28 41.6 1.00 0.9 42.5 D 10.1 10.1 0.10 4.0 3.0 178. c0.05 8 10.1 10.1 0.10 4.0 3.0 151 13 30 923 61 94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 14 32 982 65 99 0 0 6 0 0 0 46 1041 0 0 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Prot Prot Prot 5 5 2 1 0.02 0.45 0.19 42.3 41.2 1.00 1.00 1.8 0.6 44.1 41.8 D D 42.3 7.4 7.4 0.07 4.0 3.0 128 0.03 0.36 44.0 1.00 1.7 45.8 D 35.7 35.7 0.36 4.0 3.0 1764 c0.21 0.59 26.2 1.00 1.5 27.7 C 28.4 220 863 96 0.95 0.95 0.95 232 908 101 0 0 42 331 908 59 4% 4% 4% Prot Perm 1 6 23.5 23.5 0.24 4.0 3.0 791 c0.10 0.42 32.5 1.00 0.4 32.8 C 51.8 51.8 0.52 4.0 3.0 1798 c0.26 0.51 15.7 1.00 1.0 16.7 B 20.4 6 51.8 51.8 0.52 4.0 3.0 804 0.04 0.07 12.1 1.00 0.2 12.2 2005 without Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) 10/26/2004 Movement Approach LOS ;Intersection Summary ^; EBT °EBR " WBL:: '1NBT; WBR. P ► • 4/ NBL NBT .NBR, SBtJ_7.'SBL. C HCM :A. verage,Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle. Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 0.58 100.0. 61.1% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost,time (s) ICU Level of Service 20.0 B 2005 without Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Appendix C: 2005 with Project Condition Level of Service Worksheets Cendant Car Rental Maintenance Facility October, 2004 Traffic Impact Analysis Transportation Solutions, Inc. - - • HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) Movement, c. Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Greens g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap,(vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay; di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d,2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) 10/26/2004 4\ t /6. L4' i 4, EBL::', EB17: - IEBR =:. WBL.: ,,: -WBT WBR,:t NBU .:NBL . ;NBT; .: hNBR `: SBU; 8f3117,1-Z.:867.-Li: SR7. 1900 > 1900 ;1900 ,,.1.90o...:;1900.., 1900 : 1900 ., -.,- •1900: ;:1900. 1900 ; . 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1:00 1.00. 1.00.. 1.00 0:91. 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1:00. 0.95 1671 1759 1495 1736 4935 3367 0.95. 1 :00 1.00;' • ;'0.95' , 1 :00 ; 0.95 1671 1759 1495 1736 4935 3367 •31 , 61 : 101 • : 262::, 13:.'' ...: 30 930 .70 .: • 97 ,.... 230 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 ;36 66 ,,110 :h 285 14 ::32 .,989 :74 . ,. .102 , :: 242:.. 0 0 0 253 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 . ' 66 110 . - . 32 0 46 1056 0 0 :. 344 11% 8% 8% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Split Perm Prot- Prot Prot.; Prot Perm 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 6 T _1900 ;;1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 ,: :1.00 1.00 0.97 ..0.95 1.00 1626 1663 0 :95 1.00 1626 1663 75 .132„ 0.85 0.85 '. 88. .155 0 10 88.:.181':;. 11% 11% .Split 4 15.4 15.4 15.4 0.15 0.15 4.0 4.0e;. 3.0 3.0 250, .256 0.05 c0.11 0.35 0.71 37.8 40.2 1.00 1.00 0.9 38.7 48.7 45.6 1.00 1 :00 3471 1.00 3471 863 0.95 •;908 0 908 4% 0.85 1.00 1553 1.00 1553 96 0.95 101 44 57 4% • 11.2 =11.2 0.11 4.o 3.0 187 0.04 0.35 41.0 1.00 2 42.2 ,.D 8 .1. 11.2 11.2 11 2 :11.2 0.11 0.11 4.0 3.0 3.0 197:_::::167 ,. c0.06 �. 0.02 0.56 0.19 '42.1 'TS 40.3: 1.00 1.00 3.4 . 0.6' 45.5 40.8 D. D 42.1 7.4 74_ 0.07 .4 :0: 3.0 128 0.03 32.8 32.8 ` . 0.33 3.0 1619 .. c0.21 0.36 0.65 44:0 ' 281 1.00 1.00 1 7 2: 45.8 30.8 31.4 24.6 24:6- 0.25 .: 4.0 3.0 _828 c0.10 50.0 50.0 0.50 4.0 3.0 1736 c0.26 0.42 0.52 31.7 16.9 1.00 1.00 0.3, 1..1 32.0 18.1 21.2 6 50.0 0.50 4.0 3.0 777 0.04 0.07 •-13.0 1.00 0:2 ; 13.2 2005 with Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) 10/26/2004 Movement' Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated; Cycle Length,(s) . Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group ..EBL T .' .EBR..: WBL 1-1 4\ D D. 29.9:`'. 0.62 100.0 _. . 62.6% 15 HCM Level .of Service Sum of,losttime (s) ICU Level of Service SBU`':_SBL :.SBT : ::SBR: .. C B 2005 with Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: North Site Driveway & International Boulevard (SR -99) Movement= Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh /h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage. Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal_(ff) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1836 ; 464 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf`vol vCu, unblocked vol 1836 464 tC, single (s) :, w : :.._.6.8.... :6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF Js) . ........ . 35 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 98 100 cM capacity (veh /t:!) V ' N„ : 67 545 492 t 10/27/2004 rvWBL 'WBR`�' NBT NBR °:' :p.SBI: SBT -` r 4 +'%. 'r`'f`f Yield Free s 0% 0% 0% 0 12 1250 , 20.'. 0 1286 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 13 1359 ` 22' 1 0 ; 1398 None 1380 4:1 Direction,'Lane #` , : 'WB 1 NB.1 •NB.2 NB -3; SB 1 :.. • SB:2 " 'S13.3 Volume Total 13 543 543 293: `.466.:: 466 ; 466 Volume Left 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 Volume'Right.. 13 0 •0 22 0 0. 0. 545 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 '0.02''' .0:32 0:32. 0:17: 0:27 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::118 00 0.0 B cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s): Approach LOS 11.8 0.0 B 0.0 Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34 :6% ICU Level of Se'ivice Analysis Period (min) 15 2005 with Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 160th Street & South Site Driveway 10/27/2004 .Mo■ement EBL' Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh /h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft); pX, platoon unblocked vC, `conflicting volume' 409.` vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s ) 2.2 p0 queue free % 97 cM capacity (veh /hy r 1.147y; 29 0.92 32 EBT WBTWBR' "SBLa SBRB`= 4+ +T Free ;Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 302 376' ' 0: 0 48 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 328 409, 0:,.._.:;0 409 "4 1 Direction'; Lane # ` ' ,- Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity.. 0.03 0.13 0:16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 Control Delay (s)..„._ 2.0 0.0 0:0; Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.8> 0.0 Approach LOS one °.636 636 204 6.8 -6.9 3:5 3 :3 100 93 .399; 802".. EB7,1 ; `EB 2: ,:WB `1,:'. WB 21SB.1 141 219 . 272 _ 136 .:. <52 32 0 0 0 0 p 0 � a :52 1147 1700 1700 1700 802 0.08 0.07 0 5 0.0.`,'9:8 A Intersection Summary. . ,: r ' Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 1.0 '32.9 %» -:ICU Level of Service 15 2005 with Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 NORTHWEST BUILDING SURVEY PROJECT [NWBS NO. WA- 001] FRED NELSON BARN / OLD RIVERVIEW FARMS DAIRY BARN Grady Way SW & Interurban Ave., Tukwila, (King County), Washington Report prepared for: Family Fun Centers 29111 SW Town Center Loop W. Willsonville, Oregon 97070 Mulvanny Partnership Architects 11820 Northup Way, #E300 Bellevue, Washington 98005 For submission to: The City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation State of Washington Olympia, Washington Report Text prepared by: Katheryn H. Krafft Historic Resource Specialist Krafft & Krafft CRM Seattle, Washington Photography prepared by: John Stamets Architectural Photographer Seattle, Washington September 30, 1997 1 R EC E OCT 0fi. 1997 J DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND The Family Fun Centers is considering developing the site of the old Fred Nelson Farm as a family amusement center. The proposed project anticipated the demolition of the Fred Nelson Barn. As part of.the environmental Review process, it was determined by the City of Tukwila that the demolition, if or when undertaken, would adversely impact the barn, an historic resource identified as potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Based on consultation with the Washington State Office of - Archaeology & Historic Preservation (OAHP), the City required the project proponents to submit a written and photographic report of the Fred Nelson Barn in order to mitigate the lose of the historic resource. In • late July. 1997, - Katheryn H. Krafft (Historic Resource Specialist) and John Stamets (Architectural Photographer) were hired by the project proponents to. prepare a report based on (but not strictly following) the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) recordation guidelines and format. Ms. Krafft and Mr. Stamets completed the necessary field examination and' photographic records by mid- August 1997. Prior to the completion of the report, the entire barn was destroyed by an arson fire in the early hours of August 31, 1997. Due to the , lose of the historic resource, the Recommendations section intended to guide selective removal (of portable architectural features and historic building fabric) has been deleted from the report format. This report was prepared and submitted in order to meet the initial stipulations of the City of Tukwila and OAHP. It is anticipated that copies of this "report shall be made available to the public through the City of Tukwila and the University of Washington Libraries. II. HISTORICAL INFORMATION A. Physical History 1. Date of Erection: c.1902 2. Architect /builder: Fred. Nelson 3. Original & subsequent owners: Fred Nelson (1898- c.1954) Jacob. Nielsen (c.1954 -n.d) Ray Nielsen (n.d.- present) 4. Alterations & additions: Cow Barn [Flatbarn] (c.1925) Equipment Shed (c.1960) Loafing Shed (c. 1962) B. Historic Context Fred Nelson Farm - Fred Nelson was one of three Nelson brothers - James, Herman and Fred - who all emigrated from Denmark in the 1880s and settled in the White -Green River Valley vicinity. He 2 was born in Denmark in 1871 and was raised in a region where dairy farming was dominant and as a child he worked as a hired hand on dairy farms. After coming to the United States in 1889, he traveled directly to the home of his brother James, who had previously settled in the White-Green River Valley and acquired extensive acreage for farming. He worked for local farmers over the next several years. In 1898 he married Dora Jorgensen, the daughter of Chris Jorgensen, one of the local farmers who he had worked for. The Fred Nelsons acquired 100 acres of land adjacent to the Green River from James Nelson and like James, established a dairy farm. The Nelsons first built a large Victorian farmhouse (c.1901) with the help of a carpenter, Mr. Olsen and the following year constructed a large hay barn (c.1902) that included 20 wooden stanchions. The design and construction of the Fred Nelson Barn is similar to the earliest dairy barns found in the-Puget Sound region. These are typically multi- purpose barns, that are simple gable- roofed structures constructed with peeled cedar logs set into the ground. This barn type is further defined by the orientation of an interior wagon alley and large open areas for the storage of loose hay from floor to ceiling. Partial lofts are limited to areas above livestock stalls (for horses or oxen), feed, storage areas and enclosed milking alleys /stanchion lines. The pole barn was identified as early as 1863 in the American Agriculturist as a "cheap and convenient" method of construction for barns in the Pacific Northwest. The Nelson Barn clearly follows this typology, however with 20 stanchions was relatively large and finished with more sophisticated cladding [milled---board & (routed) batten] rather than the typical wide vertical board found in the earliest barns. The Nelsons, with the help of their children, proceeded to develop a large prosperous dairy farm on this site. An undated historic photograph included in Tukwila - Community at the Crossroads (p.74) shows the farmhouse and hay barn - c.1912. Within close proximity to the barn were 'two small wooden buildings each with a gable roof form. Due to their sizes and physical relationships to the barn, the house and the river, they appear to possibly be the original. and second (c.1912) milk houses. In about 1925, a modern cow barn (also known as a "flatbarn") was added to the west end of the original multi- purpose hay 'barn. The cow" barn included 40 metal stanchions, concrete floors with gutters, electricity, easily whitewashed interior finishes and improved ventilation. The design and construction of the Nelson cow barn followed a widely used plan and is indicative of early 20th C. advances in dairy technology, specialization, modern sanitation methods and the increasing size of the typical dairy herd.[See Historic Photo A &B] By 1937, while the acreage of the Nelson Farm had been reduced to approximately sixteen acres the farm included two residences and at least eight farm buildings in addition to the hay and cow barn. Historic tax record photographs (1938) of the barns clearly show a wood stave silo adjacent to the north side of the cow barn and other (possibly-early loafing) sheds situated to. the northeast of the hay barn. These records also indicate that a "lean-to" 3 equipment shed had been added to the east end of the hay barn by 1938. Archival Assessor's Record Cards with historic photographs (1938 and 1949) show the evolution of the second milk house constructed c.1912. The milk house is a critical component of any dairy farmstead and often includes design alterations necessary to accommodate changing health regulations, the evolving technology of milk storage, and new modes of transportation from farm to market. A 1961 aerial photograph shows the complex as it had evolved to that date and appears to show the evolving milk house in place where an abandoned feed shed is currently situated. The dates of the demolition of the milk house and silo have not been confirmed, however the modern loafing shed, feed shed and equipment shed are all similar in construction and were probably constructed in the early 1960s and the earlier farm buildings were removed. It is unclear as to when Fred Nelson ceased operating the farm and dairy. The Bergsma family began milking for Fred Nelson in 1934 and tax records indicate that the farmhouse and barns were in use in 1938 and remained in his ownership until 1954 when they were acquired by Jacob Nielsen, a dairyman operating the adjacent Riverview Farm. Dora and Fred Nelson raised a family of six daughters (who ran the hay fork and processed the milk) and one son (who for a period drove the milk route). Both Fred and Dora were heavily involved in community and civic affairs. They each served at local, state and regional levels in the Grange, served on the Renton School Board and were active in Danish fraternal and religious organizations. Fred Nelson was also the District Representative to the Washington.State Legislature from 1917 until 1919 and later helped to found Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. Dora Nelson died in 1938 and Fred lived to the age of 92, dying in 1963. The Fred Nelson Junior High School (constructed 1963) was dedicated in appreciation of his community service. Renton Junction - The Interurban railway, an electric commuter rail line began operating on September 25, 1902. It provided fast, frequent and economical commuter service between Seattle and Tacoma via Kent and Auburn. One of the busiest stops along the route was Renton Junction where the Renton branch .. joined the north -south rail line. The station and tracks, along with a telegraph office, were elevated on a trestle and situated in relative close proximity to the Fred Nelson Barn. Historic photographs show that the southern side of the barn roof was painted to include advertising that could be easily seen along the railway route. The area around the station became a social and commercial hub. By 1907, the acreage associated with the Fred Nelson Farm was crossed or bordered by a macadam paved county road, and three, rail lines including the Northern Pacific (completed in 1887), the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul (built shortly thereafter) and the Interurban railway, Maple Grove Park - In 1908 Fred Nelson developed an attractive portion of his pasture land on the bank of the Green River (and south of the Interurban trestle) into a public picnic grounds. Known as Maple Grove Park, it included picnic facilities and 4 shelters. Due to its close proximity to Renton Junction, the park became a popular gathering place for community, political and social events. Soon after establishing the park, Fred Nelson added a bowling alley and dance pavilion. After the Interurban railway stopped service in 1928, the activity at Renton Junction decreased and then the Depression brought about the closure of Maple Grove Park. Fred Nelson sold the park, however it continued to operate through the 1930s. For a brief period it included a roller skating rink until it was finally closed with the advent of W.W.II. Riverview Farm - Jacob Nielsen began to operate Riverview Farm in 1928. The farm was initially established on an eastern portion of Fred Nelson's original acreage and appears to have included farm structures originally built (c.1910) as part of the Nelson. Farm. Beginning with 20 cows, the Nielsens built up the herd until they had 600 cows and seven milk delivery routes. Jacob Nielsen did not acquire the portion of the property that included the original hay barn, cow barn, milk house and old farmhouse until 1954, however he most likely leased the property for a period of time prior to purchasing it. The original hay and cow barns were clearly used by Jacob Nielsen who painted the west end of the cow barn with a "Riverview Farm" sign. Nielsen also made the loafing shed and equipment shed additions (c.1960) to the barn(s) in order to modernize his sizable dairy operation. At its-peak, Riverview Farm had 17 employees who worked in the various barns and a large bottling plant. The dairy farm operated until 1975 and Riverview Farm continued three wholesale routes until 1990. [See Historic Photo C] III. ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION INote:Text describes physical condition prior to fire destruction] A. General Statement 1. Architectural Character: The layout and plan, materials of construction and roof form of the main hay barn are all indicative of the earliest multi-purpose dairy barns typically built in the Puget Sound during the late nineteen and first decade of the 20th C. The architectural character of the main hay.barn is defined by its simple construction, prominent broken gable roof form and peeled log structural system, all.essential characteristics of the earliest Puget Sound barns. This barn type is further defined by the orientation of the interior wagon alley and large open areas for the storage of loose hay from floor to ceiling. The Cow Barn ("flatbarn") addition is conventional wood frame construction and is indicative of early 20th C. advances.in' dairy technology and specialization, modern sanitation methods and the increases in the typical dairy herddsize. 2. Condition of building fabric: A significant portion of the building is seriously deteriorated and inaccessible. The entire south wall of the main hay barn is collapsed and is overgrown with shrubs on the exterior and has debris piled up on the interior side, such that it was .too dangerous for close examination. The 5 roofs of both the Equipment Shed and the Loafing Shed are partially collapsed. Ceiling finish materials within the cow barn have also collapsed. Original cladding, doors, window sash and roofing materials are also highly damaged and /or deteriorated. B. Description of Exterior 1. Overall dimensions: Main Hay Barn (64'x 72') Cow Barn [Flatbarn] (32'x 64') Equipment Shed (27'x 58') Loafing Shed (50'x 64') 2. Foundations: Concrete flooring materials were observed in portions of the hay barn, however no concrete appeared to be used for structural support. The cow barn (f latbarn) , equipment shed and loafing shed utilize concrete foundations. 3. Walls: Hay Barn (board & batten cladding) Cow Barn (rustic siding) Equipment Shed (corrugated metal) Loafing Shed (corrugated metal) 4. Structural System: Main Hay Barn- Cedar pole construction (typ. 10 "-13" round) with milled cross members & angle braces. Loft girder sizes typ. 8" x 16 ", milled post members typ. 11 "x 11", angle braces approx. 6" x 6", cross beams approx. 4" x 10", loft rafters . approx. 3" x 10" @ 2'o.c., roof rafters 2x8 @ 2'o.c.(with ridge cross ties). No ridge beam w/ all roof loads carried by rafters to pole & cross beam, system [See Sketch Plan and WA -001 -1 to 8] Cow Barn- Conventional wood frame construction 2x6 @ 2'o.c. with 2x roof /ceiling,gable truss system @ 2'o.c. 5. Exterior features: Building form- Hay barn is a prominent side gable /English barn form with central wagon alley perpendicular to ridge line. Low plate height /eave line.[WA- 001 -1] Cow barn is a low gable form with a prominent window pattern.[WA- 001-8] Cladding- 1x12 cedar with millwork routed batten 3/4 "x 2.5" at original hay barn. Cladding at cow barn is typical rustic (T&G) type.[WA- 001 -9] Paint color- Barn Red with white trim (original cladding /paint is visible at connection between hay barn & cow barn) Signage- Carved into gable end window head trim (@ east elevation)is the date of construction "1902 ". Sign at Cow Barn west elevation wall "Riverview Farms" [WA- 001 -9] 6. Openings: Wagon doors- Constructed w/ typ. board & batten cladding material, approx. 12' high x 6' wide w/ gable cut angle & Z -brace support. Set located @ north & south elevations (not visible from exterior). North elevation- Segmental arched opening at concrete bin & X -brace sliding doors (appear to be modern construction). East elevation- One small square opening at gable peak. South elevation- Original milking alley windows (small square w /multi -pane wooden sash). Cow barn- Eight double sash. (hopper type upper member) at North & South elevation, typical 6/6 multiple panes.[WA- 001 -12] 7. Roof: Typical asphalt roofing o/ cedar shingles o /strip sheathing. Side gable /English barn form with central through 6 wagon alley that runs perpendicular to ridge line. Low plate height /eave line at North & South elevations with low gabled roofs over wagon alley entry openings at North & South elevations. Soffit at rake and eave lines (approx. 1,0" overhang).[WA- 001 -1] Prominent roof ventilator (gable form .with arched louvered openings at ea. elevation - accentuated by white trim).[WA - 001 -10] The original "prancing horse weather vane" has been removed from the top of the ventilator. Two original roof ventilators (very similar in design) have also been removed from cow barn. Kneebraces (west elevation) and exposed rafter ends at cow barn. [WA- 001 -9] C. Description of Interior 1. Floor plan: [See Sketch Plan] Main hay barn is divided into five bays w /central through wagon alley, Large open floor to ceiling hay mow and partial lofted areas over original milking alley at south side. Several operable wooden type stanchions remain in place.[WA -001 -2 to 8] Cow barn plan configuration appears to have originally been w /side feed alleys and central cow and manure removal alley. All stanchions_ have been removed from cow barn. [WA- 001 -11] 2. Flooring: Plank (3x10) flooring on mud sills visible in east end of hay barn. Concrete slab visible in original milking alley including manure trough. Concrete slab visible in portions . of wagon alley and adjacent spaces. Cow barn has entirely concrete floor (manure & feed troughs no longer distinguishable) . 3. Wall & ceiling finishes: Extent of whitewashed area indicative of degree of milk handling and size of herd.: Whitewash areas located throughout all lower portions of perimeter of hay barn and throughout entire cow barn.[WA- 001 -8] Interior is dominated by cedar pole and heavy timber structural members. Beaded board (whitewashed) wall & ceiling finishes throughout cow barn. [WA- 001 -11] 4. Openings & Hardware: Some interior sliding doors are visible. Standard utilitarian commercial type latches /sliding mechanisms. D. Site 1 General siting and orientation: Historic dairy barns are typically situated at :a high point in relation to a river valley with ample pasture land and a source of cool water originally needed for milk storage. The Fred Nelson Barn is sited. in relationship to the meandering channel of the White -Green River and the alignments of historic roadways. The river channel and the old roadway routes have been altered by historic railroad alignments and modern'f reeway construction. An abandoned feed shed is situated adjacent to the barn and near the site'of the old milk house which was .carefully sited between the river bank and the barn at a point easily accessible by wagon or truck. A wood stave silo once stood in the vicinity of where the collapsed loafing shed is currently situated. The old farmhouse, now heavily altered and vandalized, is situated directly to the east 7 of the barn. Miscellaneous other houses and farm or dairy buildings associated with the Riverview Farm are located to the east and south of the farmhouse. The site is traversed by Puget Sound Power & Light transmission lines supported on towers. Portions of the site include piles. of gravel related to a former gravel pit that was operated on the site.[See Historic Photo 3] V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION A. Bibliography . Aerial Survey, War Department, Corps of Engineers, US Army, 1944. Courtois, Shirley. Regional Transit System South Corridor Commuter Rail Project Draft Technical Report - Environmental Assessment Historic Resources, June 1994. Dole, Philip. "The Calef's Farm in Oregon ", Images of an American Land(ed. Thomas Carter), University of New Mexico Press, 1997. . King County Assessor's Property Record Cards (1937 - 1972), Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional.Depository. . King County Assessor's Property Ownership Maps (1905 - 1940), Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Depository. Lentz, Florence K. Dairy Farm Properties of the Snoqualmie Valley, Multiple Property Documentation Form. January 1993. • "Maplewood, a model dairy farm ", The Seattle Post Intelligencer, November 26, 1905 Sec.2, p.10. Marsh, Dennis Wayne. Skagit Barns. University of Washington Master's Thesis. 1980. . Metsker's Atlas of King County, 1936. . Pacific Aerial Surveys, 8 -7 -61 {University of.. Washington Map Collection] Reinartz, Kay Frances. Tukwila Community at the Crossroads, Published by the City of Tukwila, 1991. . "Suspected arson destroys landmark ", Highline News, September 3, 1997, p.1. Weiss, Glen. 1994 Historic Properties Survey. [Report prepared for Airport Communities Coalition], 1994 -95. 8 Historic Photo A -/ View of south side of Fred Nelson Barn c.1938. [King County Assessor's Property Record Cards, Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Depository] 9 • Historic Photo B; -View of south side of Fred Nelson Cow Barn c.1938. [King County Assessor's Property Record Cards, Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Depository] 10 •1 • • • : Historic Photo C Enlarged view of aerial photograph of Sec.24 /T.23 /R.4E, showing the Fred Nelson Barn (center) and Riverview Farms 8- -7 -61, Pacific Aerial Surveys. [University of Washington Libraries, Map Collection] 11 NORTHWEST BUILDINGS SURVEY Index To Photographs Fred Nelsen Barn /Old Riverview Farm Dairy Barn NWBS No. WA -001 Grady Way S.W. & Interurban Ave. Tukwila King County Washington John Stamets, Photographer August 1997 403 14th Ave. E. Seattle, WA 98112 Tel. 206 - 323 -1155 NWBS No. Description WA -001- 1 Oblique exterior view of original Hay Barn showing NE corner. Other exterior views are photos WA -001 -9 and -10. WA -001- 2 Interior view of open hay mow and wagon alley, defined by the six poles and running north - south. Camera is pointed ENE. WA -001- 3 Interior view looking W at open hay mow and wagon alley, showing structural system of poles and timber cross beams. Roofline in silhouette in distance is that of Cow Barn, also seen in photos WA- 001 -9, -11 and -12., WA -001- 4 Wagon entrance on N side, as viewed in elevation from the center of the barn. View, includes sloping roof and structure, cedar poles with timber cross members and angle braces. WA -001- 5 Milking alley (under loft) in SE corner of original Hay Barn. WA -001- 6 Interior oblique view showing enclosed milking alley in south section of Hay Barn. Camera is pointed SE. WA -001- 7 Interior elevation view.of NW section of Hay Barn showing interior walls, cedar poles and cross members. Lower wall is seen from the opposite side in photo WA- 001 -8. WA -001- 8 This room is under the loft area immediately west of main entrance, or wagon alley. Note extent of whitewashed area, a requirement in dairy farms. Wall is seen from opposite side in photo WA- 001 -7. WA -001- 9 Exterior view of west sides of Loafing Shed (left), Hay Barn (R(center background) and Cow Barn (right). Note faint signage IVERVIEW) still visible on Cow Barn. WA- 001 -10 Detail of roof of Hay Barn shows ventilator, shingles, and wooden slats for climbing to rooftop. WA- 001 -11 Interior view looking W in Cow Barn shows interior space and white - whashed beaded board finish. WA- 001 -12 Interior view of SE corner of Cow Barn shows typical window openings. Vertical boards are west side of original Hay Barn. NWBS No. WA -001— 1 Oblique exterior view of original Hay Barn showing NE corner. Other exterior views are photos WA- 001 -9 and —10. NWBS No. WA -001- 2 Interior view of open hay mow and wagon alley, defined by the six poles and running north - south. Camera is pointed ENE. NWBS No. WA -001- 3 Interior view looking W at open hay mow and wagon alley, showing structural system of poles and timber cross beams. Roofline in silhouette in distance is that of Cow Barn, also seen in photos WA- 001 -9, -11 and -12. NWBS No. WA -001- 4 Wagon entrance on N side, as viewed in elevation from the center of the barn. View includes sloping roof and structure, cedar poles with timber cross members and angle braces. : . : . • •• •• ,•••• . . . • • • • • . . • • . - • _• . •••• • • -• • • • . • - • • • .• • • •• • • • _ •• .• • : • _.••• . • • _ •:•.• • ._ NWBS No. WA -001- 5 Milking alley (under loft) in SE corner of original Hay Barn. NWBS No. WA -001- 6 Interior oblique view showing enclosed milking alley in south section of Hay Barn. Camera is pointed SE. .,.: NWBS No. WA -001- 7 Interior elevation view of NW section of Hay Barn showing interior walls, cedar poles and cross members. Lower wall is seen from the opposite side in photo WA- 001 -8. • .-: , . A- 061-.7 NWBS No. WA- 001 - 8 This room is under the loft area immediately west of main entrance, or wagon alley. Note extent of whitewashed area, a requirement in dairy farms. Wall is seen from opposite side in photo WA- 001 -7. • ii NWBS No. WA -001- 9 Exterior view of west sides of Loafing Shed (left), Hay Barn (center background) and Cow Barn (right). Note faint signage (RIVERVIEW) still visible on Cow Barn. NWBS No. WA- 001 -10 Detail of roof of Hay Barn shows ventilator, shingles, and wooden slats for climbing to rooftop. NWBS No. WA- 001 -I1 Interior view looking W in Cow Barn shows interior space and white- whashed beaded board finish. .,* NWBS No. WA- 001 -12 Interior view of SE corner of Cow Barn shows typical window openings. Vertical boards are west side of original Hay Barn. CENDANT - TUKWILA Tukwila, Washington Preliminary Technical Information Report September 27, 2004 Pacific Engineering Design, LLC Civil Engineering, Surveying and Planning Consultants Pacific Engineering Job No. 04051 PRELIMINARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT FOR CENDANT - TUKWILA TUKWILA, WASHINGTON September 27, 2004 PREPARED FOR Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 3937 S 26th Street DFW Airport Dallas, TX 75261 Phone: (972) 453 -4062 Fax: (972) 453 -5103 PREPARED BY Pacific Engineering Design, LLC. 4180 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055 Phone: (425) 251 -8811 Fax: (425) 251 -8880 t 1 ei [2:1)at EXPIRES: MAY 6, 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Project Overview 1 -2 II. Preliminary Conditions 3 -7 III. Off -Site Analysis 8 IV. Detention Analysis and Design 9 V. Conveyance System Analysis 10 VI. Water Quality Design 11 -21 VII. Erosion/Sedimentation Control Design 22 VIII. Special Reports and Studies 23 I. Project Overview Cendant — Tukwila is a proposed car rental center located on the old Lewis & Clark Theater / Bowling Alley site near the intersection of International Boulevard and South 160th Street. The site is located in the Lower Green River Drainage Basin as identified in the 1998 King County Flow Control Application Map. The site drains generally east to a shallow off -site ravine that forms the headwaters of Gilliam Creek. Gilliam Creek eventually flows to the Green River, which flows to Puget Sound. Off -site drainage from west of the site is conveyed to this ravine via a 36 -inch culvert that traverses the south side of the site. The site will continue to drain to this location following construction. Per the pre - application meeting held with the city of Tukwila, flow control will not be required for the project, but water quality treatment for the new employee parking area will (see Section VI of this report). Topography is generally flat with grades between 1% and 6% present in the parking areas. The majority of the site is impervious (paved parking, buildings and sidewalks). There are no known sensitive areas on the site. On -site improvements will include demolition of the existing theater building, construction of a new administration building and employee parking in the old theater building footprint, and construction of a new fueling / car wash facility. The existing bowling alley will be converted into a fleet maintenance facility. The remainder of the site will remain mostly as it exists today. The entrance off of 160th will be re- graded to lessen the slope for large delivery vehicles and a gatehouse will be added. The parking striping will be revised for fleet storage with demolition / relocation of some planters. To provide water quality for the new employee parking area, we propose the use of a "Stormfilter" system design by Stormwater Management, Inc. The "Stormfilter" is a proprietary system and not on the 1998 KCSWDM basic menu, therefore an Adjustment Request is required. Pacific Engineering will prepare and submit this request as part of the construction documents submittal. The fueling facility will require a slot or trench drain around the perimeter of the fueling deck to contain and isolate spills or pad washing from the rest of the site. This will drain through an approved oil /water separator and connect to sanitary. The car wash will recycle the majority of its wash water, but a cleanout / overflow will be provided that can take washwater through the oil/water separator and to sanitary sewer as well. There are no watermain extensions associated with this project. The new administration building will utilize the existing meters and sprinkler room currently serving the theater, the maintenance facility will utilize those services currently serving the bowling alley. All existing fire hydrants on site will remain. Those that are shown in paving areas will remain there with the addition of concrete bollards as needed. Existing gas and power service already serving the theater and bowling alley will be utilized. It is anticipated that some fill will be required to bring the administration building / employee parking area up to grade once the theater is demolished. We do not anticipate more than 500 cubic yards of fill to accomplish this. International Boulevard is built out with curb / gutter / sidewalk improvements already in place along the site frontage. South 160th Street has curb and gutter along its frontage to the site. With no change in locations or addition of driveways, no off -site road improvements are anticipated or proposed for this project. The project will comply with all Core Requirements except Core Requirement 3 (flow control). None of the Special Requirements appear to apply to this project. 655 SE \/ E/ 625 AP \N \/ \/ r 5 � 0 UNITED ., S 161ST ST a9 2800 • 3200 _L 1 -9160TH ua1rzB < S 161 s� ND s ua PRESS.: 1= g ST To lss g T 162ND i ' CO'y "S�A D 0 7=S ) $ 1162N1 $T sAlr 1P`ao jam/ S: 7. 1 I�j 1 a w SH 71 PN 9 `r'- p wrr : 1 �i ; r� /' aAlli �p i STAlrcara IJ ;ir - N �� t IlaCMICKEN N /ARBOR Ala 1 . •• :.. _HEIGHTS -MORMON TH PA ` +1BfRU AIR I D RAt •: /�� ��� /AT� M �'o sr � ! :til: ;. 167TH T / ST s �_ ;: 11 a 3 170 rr a ,.. 1170TH 1' 1':,.. a 11o0 FS - 3800 lP' ST my 1 ®, ° II ' $ IIiF,3 M E SO 1 '" AIRPORT' 509 1 TERMINAL NORTH y ; , �— 9a 5 s 1 .II PEE 56 SATELLITE \ tMn a 'e�3 'F ':?h= s � TERMINAL 173RD S 174 Tr mimic y / , 9 PARK ST 1 2 FS .. .. ...... 176TH S I{J4'"`PA`1sjArmxrs 1 D 4 a 3 �' 11000 ;;PM>`'aia C Vs S ■_ 17• 6,:',1- :. M1dr' Mat AIR ' 3100 i /'� 5 177TH PL M� SEATTLE S 177tH �„ n e. 1x,v1Ax e MARRIOTT w 5T �� S ,509 �F MIRY CONCOURSE i;E i.tn -,,. _g � AIRPoTRT --1 sts 0. 94o: -=,, g Qqp AMSAf961Y5 ,_��4.c:ij mull ,�'6 I1rI�k�\ 0 cP jf� B __ -' 6.- � .4- 11111I'L \L 111111," ='n 1' — ._. —■-= 1∎1110 _.,� I' . L—a � YfW1iC71 •, •._..I I /ENI I I li 1 _ IV 1 l lU V i iiiiiiM � M M, q 1.1 11 1 � ski ' S _ I ° ST - -r- .. i izaix .__. . ._ sr „ „ I I FS a a as , • • HILLT1' 1 128TH' � a a ^ ^f 400 5ro MO w s 130tH C • � � z z COA9HUNITY 1 0TH m > > $ 130TH PL s 1- S 131St t to PL P h _ ` a g a € °317 � € F _ It P � AE I <�i � IA d 41, A. 14TH PL S a' .$ 134 . / / ST ST 1 1 N 0 2 _ 300 .Ill • ,I l 38TH L lice ,,. • N1:11 s s a S 3 5 6`. ` N s RIVER7ON „ „/1 N N E € ' d a a le .. S 140TH ST a as I a 0 09 s lust N 141ST ° N f is c o LAKE i O 2 S 1 2400 „ ° S 142ND ° ° z , N N i 146111 _ I UN I 4000 N fill 5 500 1 z 0�,, 4.9 d S - - <'1 3 ff `'e,, a I\ I ST g � LAKE �.., Z g 4 ° 1 Z • 48TH a> S - 150TH ST .. !,n . / ✓ ((i 5 T Z OfF1 t HIGHLINE ,y° fsa , m r 1 3 ITS _ 1 1 T N FARK MEMORIAL a , 2900 0 _ _ i D s Q N ST 6 aso —"--- r ( � TACOMA ► 5158TH S ST t?;;S8 s iMp ( 5159TH ST N _ S �* s N s is u H S 1 T �5 a, 1111 s curnimS, ; P P .. / Co , (r BOEING RI RIM 11111111611111111 BIN NAT ON L•. x tis� 30TH AV 5 32ND I ~"' AV 0 .125 .25 .375 .5 miles 1 1n. - 1900 ft. SEE\ 685 /MAP See Page 1d for Detail Airport Map site plan site plan H. Preliminary Conditions A Pre - Application meeting was held at the city of Tukwila on August 12, 2004. A copy of the city's notes are included in this section. 7) SEP 15 '04 0B :55AM TUKWILA DCD /PW CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 P.2/5 Pre- Application Checklist , ' ... ` • • ' •, "•'n''• .•e:II•,e1i''i•��«^aA•''; .r,u`�>'+j•1.;ia4_..r: r,` r'n� "F'i�it;,' :.,;!;1;;;,!,;;;..,,...:,.. . a,.' • ,,•. .,, • I.,;,Y••I Pre= Appljcation•Fle`No::P':•:; ' PB, X04 0321� +.•••�•s���'"��,"•Project:Name• Cendant•Car Rental �Grpua, xnc. °` • N� HIV ; �!,. •: ,: '. • . �1 •.:vim :." i1'.. I, %. a� ' Meeting pate and Tinier Oi3- i2:04� 3.30•P:M: ::'Site Ailaress: •15820 Tulnvila InternatiQnal.Boulevard • a--- ■•• The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information have been supplied. .ci.tukwila.wa.us for the Tukwila Municipal Code, Public Works Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards and Customer Assistance Bulletins. 2. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: ❑ Type A Short Term Nonprofit ❑ Water Meter (Permanent) ❑ Type B Short Term Profit ❑ Water Meter (Deduct) Type C Construction •-- 4cc 030 re x ❑ Water Meter (Water Only) ❑ . Type D Long Term 1444' ""t ❑ Street Vacation ❑ ' Type E Potential Disturbance ❑ Developer Reimbursement Agreement ❑ Type F Blanket ❑ Turnover ❑ Flood Zone Control ❑ Other: Z3. Water District 14‘'A i( ("04- W lD 1 ZS Sewer District v A Vk 0 .4, Water assessment Sewer assessment Assessments will be determined during the Public Works plan review process. n5. Pavement in the right -of -way that is 3 -years or newer shall not be cut. A pavement mitigation Fee applies to this project. To calculate the fee use $ , / square foot of pavement cut. V6. Provide water /sewer availability letters. Er7. Provide King County /Metro Sewer Use Certificate. Site plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. 9. Provide survey using NAD 1983/1991 and NAVD 1988 and recognized benchmarks (private roger ). • •twat W. inrormation m o' h^ needed. SEP 15 '04 08 :55AM TUKWILA DCD /PI ts/regulations may need to be met in e..V� �ryY��4�I1� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information have been supplied. .ci.tukwila.wa.us for the Tukwila Municipal Code, Public Works'Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards and Customer Assistance Bulletins. • 2. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: ❑ Type A Short Term Nonprofit ❑ Water Meter (Permanent) ❑ Type B Short Term Profit ❑ Water Meter (Deduct) [Type C Construction — '44 {kce A< ri, iz.. ❑ Water Meter (Water Only) ❑ Type D Long Term ' •`1 ❑ Street Vacation ❑ Type E Potential Disturbance ❑ Developer Reimbursement Agreement . ❑ Type F Blanket ❑ Turnover ❑ Flood Zone Control ❑ Other: Water District 1- ;0,1 ." u e, W 012.-S- Sewer District v ^ .- Vk. Water assessment - Sewer assessment Assessments will be determined during the Public,Works plan review process. 5. Pavement in the right -of -way that is 3 -years or newer shall not be.cut. A pavement mitigation fee applies to this project. To calculate the fee use $ / square foot of pavement cut. Provide water /sewer availability letters. Provide King County /Metro Sewer Use Certificate. Site plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. Provide survey using NAD 1983/1991 and NAVD 1988 and recognized benchmarks (priva to pert�), 10. Provide survey using State Plane Coordinates and NAVD 1988 (public infrastructure). 11. For Flood Zone Control Permit, provide elevations converted to 1929 NGVD. The finished floor elevation for buildings in a flood plain must be at least 1' above the 100 -year flood elevation per FIRM maps. Critical facilities shall be 3' about 100 -year elevation. 2 12. Provide surface water design per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. Surface water drainage plan must be by a registered civil engineer for all projects that do not meet the Small Site Drainage Review criteria in the Kina County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. Drainage Basin dro\OwgSUOC 18/03/2004 Infiltration Restriction Level 2 Detention A,)o de. TG h.-szo n pe% JR, y h Lam,- e,//Vi�i" &a %L,. Li• Oa .6. 7"y / rt., Lm v h Ju[2 SEP 15 '04 08 :56AM TUKWILA DCD /PW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Pre - Application Checklist File No.: PRE04 -032 P.4 /5 Page 2 of 2 13. Provide erosion prevention and sediment control per the King County Surface Water Design Manual, 1998 edition. El14. Provide a Pollution Prevention Plan. 15. The Geotechnical report must include riverbank stability analysis when a project is adjacent to the Green /Duwamish River and the natural riverbank is expected to provide bank protection for the life of the project. 16. Provide a traffic analysis /trip generation study when the project will generate 5 or more additional peak hour trips. AtS Sev.k. c4eve. w 1�h e-y-thi pyKrvLcI.To,.),rurLoa S{2-'+-24.v • netf2 4.4 7 .17. Provide a sight distance analysis per the most current edition of AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design. ❑ 18. The maximum allowable slope for access roads and driveways is 15 %. Commercial driveway access shall be 25 -35 feet wide. Residential driveway access shall be 10 -20 feet wide. A residential driveway must be paved for 20' from the property line. 2/ 19. Provide applicable easements and maintenance agreements: 6-tcLsYI 06 AN 91oP0SE3 H20. Provide backflow prevention on; domestic water fire, irrigation lines. CaEr_e— t.0 D 12x5' boa'C30u.tZ°b V�G t s, �✓ 21. Frontage improvements (TMC 11.12) required include: 89a. A, n c r.- 't4) /4/7i cl og 22. Undergrounding per TMC 11.28 applies to this project. ❑ 23, Provide turnover documents for constructed infrastructure, which the Owner will transfer to the City of Tukwila. Turnover packet enclosed. I1 24. Complete enclosed Business Declaration and return to King County. (Stamped SAE provided) R25. Contact King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit. Contact Arnauld Girard at 206 263 -3012. Provide a copy of the approval. . ° R 'T�e.►o17. Imo 2- ciao.; n S l u 'xa p .a.. ¢ FL P�"`7A.s 1' •c t.L-e-1 ca. e. ea s • Cue_ oeL sk . Additional Comments: • VIL.A.NS 5tt0. . G+ 0 u) •■Nial Po 92 e.KLs-rt. Ky e. w sri ?J ‘s u `P2 1=1.6 • 'A-Ca. K.. Ce L NG y v.> ?&c uses' siu "rim, sL 're k «.. -rt P cr W r_u La . . fbc P + P Fo . • N_oQa- 'rho-v` U 1SEP 15'14 "08:56AM^TUKWILA "ncn%Pk tion study when the project will generate 5 or moreP.525ional peak hour trips. Pis CYNoyl4vi t,ra0,,ur -wdA. SR csic. Lwet ve kN ❑ 17.. Provide a sight distance analysis per the most current edition of AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design. ❑ 18. The maximum allowable slope for access roads and driveways is 15 %. Commercial driveway access shall be 25 -35 feet wide, Residential driveway access shall be 10 -20 feet wide. A residential driveway must be paved for 20' from the property line. 19, Provide applicable easements and maintenance agreements: 6-,ct s '-, A u 4 P>zo Pow 1 20, Provide backflow prevention on domestic water fire, cmettc. %'t L. Lob t7.S ou.L E 3 [ 21. Frontage improvements (TMC 11.12) required include: irrigation lines. ❑ 22, Undergrounding per TMC 1128 applies to this project. ❑ 23. Provide turnover documents for constructed infrastructure, which the Owner will transfer to the City of Tukwila. Tumover packet enclosed. ❑ 24. Complete enclosed Business Declaration and return to King County. (Stamped SAE provided) 25. Contact King County Water and Land Resources Industrial Waste Program for an Industrial Waste Discharge Permit. Contact Arnauld Girard at 206 263 -3012. Provie a copy of the approval. o-rL tot ctad -: 5 i tz l� �. s ' i V e a ea s • c. e- i J a 51.1 -71 Additional Comments: DS s rt Atrt_ s 14.b W , ALL ex.s.-m36. A43-1 o M .e i „,c. T- S wle i ctY sib a c'F'L e_ v. c w 1 N c 7 .-.N A ?. o -r 2 ‘P t :Ve�� FoQ. EXiSrtItc1 u5&-S SL a `tk Sire k.4.s ��Gh ✓ac ..r fG� MdPc T am Enclosures: Bulleti Bulleti 4I Bulletin C1 Bulletin C8 Bulletin D1 Bulled Bulletin B Bulletin C2 Bulletin C9 Bulletin D2 Bulletin A3 Bulletin B3 Bulletin C3 Bulletin 03 • Bulletin A4 ulletin B4 Bulletin C4 Bulletin A5 Bulletin C5 Bulletin A6 Bulletin C6 Bulletin A7 Bulletin C7 Checklist prepared by (staff): wropwnst.doc ow/2004 O/‹.1-2-0 Date: Vf f 6 -r III. Off Site Analysis At this stage, Pacific Engineering has not performed a Level I downstream analysis for this project. An existing 36 -inch storm drainage pipe, carrying off -site flows from west of the site, traverses the south side of the property and discharges to a shallow ravine on the east side of the property. This forms the headwaters of Gilliam Creek. The 36 -inch pipe enters the site south of the bowling alley and then angles northeasterly through the back parking area to the ravine. Site drainage connects to this system prior to discharge into the ravine. Herrera Environmental Consultants prepared a detailed report on Gilliam Creek in March, 2001. A copy is on file with the city. IV. Detention Analysis & Design Per discussions with the city at the Pre - Application conference on August 12, 2004, detention will not be required for this project. See Pre - Application Notes, Section II of this report. 9 VI. Water Quality Design Per discussion with Ryan Larsen at the city of Tukwila, water quality treatment will be required for the proposed employee parking area to be located in the old theater building footprint. An analysis of the existing vs. proposed site plan shows a net increase in pollution generating impervious surface (PGIS) of 37,128 SF. Water quality treatment will be provided for 60% of the developed 2 -year peak flow off of the new PGIS (per the 1998 KCSWM). Pacific Engineering proposes to use a pre -cast Stormfilter system to treat this flow prior to release to the existing storm drainage system. The "Stormfilter" is a proprietary system produced by StormWater Management out of Portland, Oregon. Discussions with Ryan Larsen indicate that we will be able to use this system through a variance request, as it is not on the basic water quality menu in the 1998 King County Storm Water Manual. This section includes design information as well as catalogue information concerning operation and maintenance of the "Stormfilter" facility. PGIS Area to WQ Facility = 37,200 SF (0.85 Acres) Create Time Series: 2 -Year Developed Peak Discharge = 0.474 CFS Treat 60% of 2 -Year Peak Discharge (0.60) (0.474) = 0.284 CFS Total Flow to be Treated = 0.284 CFS Determine the number of filter cartridges: Number of Cartridges Required = (0.480) (449gpm / cfs) (7.5gpm / cartridge) Number of Cartridges Required = (0.284) (59.86666) Number of Cartridges Required = 17.00 Design for 17 Filter Cartridges — Use 8' x 16' Precast Stormfilter Vault Check for High -Flow Bypass: Assuming all cartridges are offline, the vault flow spreader can route a maximum of 2.2 CFS before topping the interior baffle wall and allowing any accumulated floatables to escape. Maximum anticipated flow (100 -yr) per KCRTS Time Series = 1.05 CFS Check: 1.634 CFS < 2.2 CFS OK (74.3% of capacity) No High -Flow Bypass Required 1 I SECTION 3.2 RUNOFF COMPUTATION AND ANALYSIS METHODS r FIGURE 3.2.2.A RAINFALL REGIONS AND REGIONAL SCALE FACTORS ST 1.0/ ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA 0.9 LA 1.0 LA 1 2 SNOHOMISH COUNTY ST 1.1 ST 1.0 Rainfall Regions and Regional Scale Factors Incorporated Area - River /Lake Major Road PISPCS COUNTY LA 0.9 9/1/98 3 -22 1998 Surface Water Design Manual (Q . CENDANT - TUKWILA King County Runoff Time Series Program Version 4.42b All files will be read /written in the Working Directory Working Directory:P:\Project Files\04051 Lewis & Clark\KCRTS KCRTS Command CREATE a new Time Series Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea -Tac Computing Series : 04051PVMT.tsf Regional Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type : Reduced Creating 15- minute Time Series File Loading Time Series File :C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA\STEI15R.srf 8 Flow Path: Length 285.00 ft @ Slope 0.021000 Impervious 0.85 acres Scaling Yr: 8 Total Area : 0.85 acres Peak Discharge: 1.05 CFS at 6:30 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:04051PVMT.tsf 8 Time Series File: Project Location: - -- Annual Peak Flow Rate Rank (CFS) 0.474 0.330 0.833 0.384 0.480 0.497 0.620 1.05 Computed Peaks Time Series Computed FLOW FREQUENCY ANALYSIS 04051pvmt.tsf Sea -Tac Flow Rates - -- Flow Frequency Analysis Time of Peak 6 8/27/01 18:00 8 9/17/02 16:15 2 12/08/02 17:15 7 8/26/04 1:00 5 10/28/04 16:00 4 10/22/05 10:00 3 10/25/06 22:45 1 1/09/08 6:30 - Peaks - - Rank (CFS) 1.05 0.833 0.620 0.497 0.480 0.474 0.384 0.330 0.976 Return Prob Period 1 100.00 0.990 2 25.00 0.960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 ,0.980 13 ttanditter THE ST© RMATER MA / ,---, (...,1 t.___, i.,, 1 I ' -______- fln L AT St@rmIFOOMar r MANHOLE COVER FLOW SPREADER FLOW SPREADER OUTLET PIPE HIGH FLOW BYPASS Storm Filter CARTRIDGE U.S. Patent No. 5,322,629, 5,624,576, 5,707,527, 6,027,639 and other U.S and Foreign patents pending. FILTRATION BAY ENERGY DISSIPATOR STOR 1 WATE MANAGEMENT INC. Storwfaler THE STORM /AVER 141AREA@ IEK4 g ®PE 'O0 @P The StormFilter is the leading stormwater treatment technology. It is a passive siphon-actuated, flow-through, stormwater filtration system consisting of a concrete vault that houses rechargeable, media - filled filter cartridges. The StormFilter works by passing stormwater through these media - filled cartridges, which trap particulates and adsorb pollutants such as dissolved metals, nutrients, and hydrocarbons. The StormFilter is offered in four different configurations: cast - in- place, precast, linear, and catch basin. The precast, linear and catch basin models use pre-manufactured vaults to ease the design and installation process. The cast-in -place units are customized for larger flows and may be either uncovered or covered underground units. APPLICATIONS The StormFilter excels in a wide variety of applications and is being used -to treat stormwater runoff in a wide variety of sites throughout-the United States. For jurisdictional authorities, the system offers high levels of pollutant removal and improved water quality. For developers, the StormFilter is cost - effective, easy to install, and uses no additional land (entirely underground). For engineers, full design support, provided by Stormwater Management at no extra cost, is invaluable. These benefits, coupled with unsurpassed versatility, make the StormFilter the best long -term solution for stormwater treatment. TYPICAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS: • Parking Tots • Commercial and industrial sites • High- density and single - family housing • • Maintenance, transportation and port facilities TYPICAL ROADWAY APPLICATIONS: • Arterial roads • Freeways • Bridge decks • Light rail and transit facilities For specialized applications, laboratory evaluation of the water is normally required to establish the operational parameters. Stormwater Management can perform these studies through its outstanding Research and Development department. I I +Po DESIGN CRITERIA The StormFilter is approved as a Best Management Practice (BMP) with many agencies throughout the United States. Regulatory requirements for designing BMPs vary from state to state, and may be based on a water quality flow rate determined from a design storm, a water quality volume, or removal efficiency for a target pollutant. Stormwater Management will help you work with your local governing agency to ensure that your StormFilter system meets their requirements. SYSTEM SIZING AND HYDRAULIC DROP System sizing is determined by analyzing data from either a volume -based or flow-based design, depending on which criterion is required by the relevant jurisdiction. Using the required criterion, Stormwater Management engineers will work with you to determine the optimum number of cartridges and system vault size. The StormFilter typically requires 2.3 feet of head differential between the inlet and the outlet. For a size evaluation and cost estimation, complete the project information sheet contained in this package, and fax it to Stormwater Management. PRETREATMENT AND BYPASSING Stormwater Management evaluates the need for pretreatment devices for each site. The StormFilter typically does not require pretreatment, but if pretreatment is needed the following devices may be used: the StormGate SeparatorTM, StormScreenTM, sedimentation vaults, manholes, oil /water separators, detention/ sedimentation tanks or ponds. Stormwater Management can provide recommendations on the need for and size of these facilities. Depending on individual site characteristics, some systems should be equipped with a StormGateTM high -flow bypass. The StormGate is used when the peak storm event generates a flow that exceeds the overflow capacity or design capacity of the StormFilter. CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION Stormwater Management provides precast StormFilters to the end user as a complete system. The StormFilter is typically delivered to the project site in two separate shipments. The precast vault is first delivered to the site by the local precaster. Once the project is near completion, the site is paved, landscaping is complete, and the storm drains are clean, filter cartridges are delivered for installation in the vault. The filter cartridges can be installed by the on -site contractor or Stormwater Management. 1� Storm! liter CAIIIIIDGE r FILTER MEDIA CENTER TUBE FLOAT SEAT SCRUBBING REGULATORS r CAP CHECK VALVE HOOD GASKET HOOD OUTER SCREEN OPTIONAL SECONDARY FILTER MEDIA INNER MESH UNDER-DRAIN MANIFOLD FILTERED WATER UNDER-DRAIN MANIFOLD VAULT FLOOR CAST INTO VAULT FLOOR U.S. Patent No. 5,322,629, 5,624,576, 5,707,527, 6,027,639 and other U.S and Foreign patents pending. STO,LqWWATE; MANAGEMENT INC. StormFilter CARERIRSE The Stormwater Management StormFilter® cartridge is the heart of the StormFilter system. The ability to select media based on your site needs and the passive siphon function that maximizes filter efficiency and longevity make it the leading stormwater treatment technology available today. The StormFilter cartridges are housed in the filtration bay of a StormFilter vault. The StormFilter vault is composed of three bays: a pretreatment bay, a filtration bay, and an outlet bay. Polluted stormwater enters the pretreatment bay where heavy solids and floatables are trapped. The pretreated flows are then directed into the filtration bay for full treatment. Flow passes through the filters into an under -drain manifold that discharges fully treated flow to the outlet bay. The outlet bay collects flow from the under -drain manifold for discharge through a single outlet pipe. During a storm, as water enters and fills the filtration bay, polluted stormwater passes through the filtration media, where particulates are trapped and pollutants adsorbed, and into a center drainage tube. Air trapped under the hood is purged through the check valve, as it is displaced by the treated water filling the drainage tube. When the water in the cartridge reaches the top of the float, buoyant forces pull the float free and allow the filtered water to drain out into the under-drain manifold for discharge. As the water drains, the check valve closes, creating a siphon effect. The siphon increases the flow potential and distribution of pollutants across the filter media, increasing the effectiveness and useful life of the filter cartridge. The siphon effect continues until the storm subsides and the water level in the vault begins to drop. A hanging water column remains under the filter cartridge hood until the water level in the vault reaches the scrubbing regulators. As the water in the vault continues to drop, air bubbles rush through the scrubbing regulators releasing the hanging water column under the hood. The air bubbles agitate the surface of the filter media, causing much of the accumulated sediment to drop to the vault floor. This surface-cleaning mechanism increases the effective life of the filter. 17 ( FILTER 11FAIA : :•:•:•., • .:•:•:" • ''' ' r 1 .,,-.L) ." •,5,,•zr.. :,1 ■ i .r.' ,1/4 . 1:!:- :1 ' Piy....,% 1113 111 , \ /1"' ‘ D1----: • ■ .,„ .. , ' is+ PERLITE CSF® LEAF MEDIA iii -''''''' , ., ,- ',=-, .; -1-' IRON INFUSED GAC PLEATED MEDIA SELECTION GUIDE POLLUTANT PERLITE CSF ZEOLITE GAC IRON INFUSED '''' I ZEOLITE . ' '4:I '' „ 1 FABRIC PLEATED FABRIC Sediments 1 / / Oil and Grease I I Soluble Metals Organics "1 Total Phosphorus / / / Dissolved Phosphorus 1 Total Nitrogen '1 1 / Dissolved Ammonium / 1 e, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INC. A The Stormwater Management StormFilter® uses a variety of filter media to target and remove pollutants It is the only stormwater treatment system to offer such versatility in removing site - specific pollutants. customized for each site by using different filter media to remove sediments, soluble phosphorus, solu grease. In many cases, a combination of media is recommended to maximize the effectiveness of pollutant from stormwater runoff. The StormFilter can be ble metals, and oil and removal. PERLITE Perlite is a naturally-occurring puffed volcanic ash. Its highly porous, multicellular structure, and rough edges make it very effective for removing fine particles. Perlite can be used as a stand -alone media or in conjunction with other media. As a stand alone media, perlite most effectively removes suspended solids (TSS), and oil and grease. CSF® LEAF MEDIA CSF leaf media is created from a feed stock of pure deciduous leaves collected by the City of Portland, Oregon. Stormwater Management processes composted leaves into a granular organic media that is most effective at removing soluble metals, (TSS), and oil and grease. ZEOLITE Zeolite is a naturally occurring mineral that has been used in a variety of water filtration applications. Zeolite is used to remove soluble metals, ammonium and some organics. GAC (Granular Activated Carbon) GAC has been used in the water filtration industry for many years. This media is known for its micro - porous structure and extensive surface area, which provides high levels of adsorption. Stormwater Management has taken this developed filtration media and applied it to the stormwater industry primarily for the removal of oil and grease and organics such as pentachlorophenol (PCP) and TNT. IRON INFUSED MEDIA Iron infused media is Stormwater Management's newest addition to media filtration. This open -cell structured media is infused with small bits of iron to remove dissolved phosphorus. This media also reduces soluble copper and zinc, making it extremely valuable for sensitive watersheds with nutrient loading problems. PLEATED FABRIC INSERTS Stormwater Management's pleated fabric inserts are designed primarily for TSS control. The reusable insert fits inside the standard cartridge; extra space between the insert and the center tube can be used for the addition of granular media to provide soluble pollutant removal. Media selection requires an understanding of the pollutants generated from the site and the sensitivity of the receiving waters. The media selection guide on the other side of this sheet can be used as a basic guideline when choosing the appropriate media for your site. I II _ STO t zo MANAGEMENT INC. ; Maintenance is crucial to the ongoing effectiveness of all stormwater treatment solutions. The purpose of our product line is to remove pollutants. To do the job effectively, each product is designed to be maintained at regular intervals. Stormwater Management maintenance is straight forward, efficient and cost - effective. The company offers long-term contracts as well as single maintenance plans. The StormFilter design allows maintenance to be performed in dry conditions, eliminating the need to remove and dispose of large volumes of contaminated standing water. Maintenance is typically annual, but can depend on the pollutant Toad characteristics of each site. Maintenance for a typical 8'x16' StormFilter with 30 cartridges takes an average of 2.5 hours. After maintenance is completed, Stormwater Management provides a Certificate of Compliance that verifies maintenance has been performed and that the StormFilter continues to meet original design standards. This Certificate is sent to the owner, and a copy can be sent to the relevant local storm - water authority on request. Stormwater Management provides detailed Operation and Maintenance Guidelines with each system and offers a complete range of maintenance services. Stormwater Man- agement can perform the entire maintenance or work directly with owners who wish to perform their own maintenance. Stormwater Management will also work with owners to implement source control measures, thereby improving site stormwater management and lowering overall maintenance costs. For jurisdictional authorities, Stormwater Management maintains an extensive data base and permanent files for all StormFilter installations. 2l J' VII. Erosion /Sedimentation Control Design Due to the impervious nature of the site, erosion and sedimentation control will be provided by silt fence in the immediate work area, CB inserts in any "downstream" catchbasins, and possibly some filter dams or logs outside the work area as a secondary containment BMP. These items will be addressed on the Temproary Erosion Control plan submitted with the construction permit drawings VIII. Special Studies and Reports This section will include any studies and reports pertinent to the Cendant — Tukwila project. Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION ATTACHMENT A I. PROJECT /PROPOSAL BACKGROUND 1. Applicant: Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 2. Address: 15820 Tukwila International Boulevard Tax parcels: (1) 222304 - 9101 -02 (3) 222304 - 9001 -03 (2) 222304- 9015 -07 (4) 222304- 9102 -01 Quarter SW 1/4 of SW 14, section 22, township 23N, range 4E., W.M. Legal Description: See attached "Record of Survey" for Sterling Realty Organization dated 4/12/04 produced by Triad Associates, job #04 -077 3. Contact: Tenant/Development Coordinator: Karl Westerman Cendant Car Rental Group , Inc. 3937 S. 26th St., DFW Airport Dallas, TX 75261 Phone: (972) 453 -4062 Email: karl.westermann @cendant.com Architect: Chandler Eason Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Highway #300 Burlingame, CA 94025 Phone: (650) 692 -9911 Email: ceason3(c�bdaarch.com Property Owner: Michael Lancaster Property /Construction Manager Sterling Realty Organization 600 106th Ave N.E. P.O. Box 91723 Bellevue, WA 98009 -1723 Phone: (425) 455 -8151 Email: mikel@SterlingRealty.com Property Owner's Representative Michael Aippersbach PO Box 95429 Seattle WA 98145 -2429 Phone: 523 -3764 Fax: 524 -0337 E -mail: aipp @prodigy.net Page 1 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. 9/27/04 City of Tukwila 4. Property Owner: Sterling Realty Organization (SRO) - Signed Declaration attached. The applicant, Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc., will lease the site from SRO and operate the rental car service center facility. 5. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Regional Commercial (RC) 6. Zoning Designation: Regional Commercial (RC) 7. General Description of Surrounding Land Uses: North: State Route # 518 is located immediately to the north of proposed site. In this vicinity, the width of the right -of -way is approximately 400 feet. To the north of SR # 518 are more commercial uses along Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) (Pacific Highway south). To the north of SR 518 is a strip of land between S. 154th street on the north and SR 518 right of way on the south. The strip is composed of a mixture of vacant land and large apartment complexes. South: The Fellowship Bible Church of Riverton Heights is located to the south adjoining the southern portion of the proposed site and the new configuration of S. 158th Street. To the south of the Fellowship Bible Church of Riverton Heights is the corporate limit of Tukwila, which adjoins the City of SeaTac (south side of S. 160th Street). Within the City of SeaTac, commercial development (a restaurant -- Taco Time) exists at the southeast corner of Tukwila International Boulevard South and S. 160th Street. The remaining area to the east along the south side of S. 160th Street is designated as high- density multifamily (Evergreen Heights condominiums, Birchwood apartments, Sutton Suites, Julliene Apartments, Innsbruck apartments with some existing duplex and single family development). West: Part of this site borders Tukwila International Boulevard. Adjoining the west side of the proposed site is commercial development along the east side of Tukwila International Boulevard that includes Dollar- Rent -a -Car, an Ace hardware store, the restaurant El Charro and a Washington State Police facility within the city limits of Tukwila. Additional commercial development on the west side of Tukwila International Boulevard includes Bai Tong (Thai restaurant) immediately at the northwest corner S 160th Street and Tukwila International Blvd. To the north is an East Indian specialty grocery store (India Place), Seattle Auto Exchange, Subway, Enterprise Rentals and Shuttle Park (off- airport parking facility). On the southwest corner of S. 160th Street and International Blvd. is Atomic Video. The western boundary of the corporate limits of the City of Tukwila is the east right -of -way line of International Boulevard South. There is also commercial development on the west side of International Boulevard South, which is within the corporate limits of the City of SeaTac. East: Adjoining the east side of the proposed site is Quik -Park, an airport short/long term paid parking facility. Further to the east is Condominium development (Laurel Estates) and multifamily . development (Sunnydale Apartments - 72 units) immediately adjoin the eastern edge of the proposed site. Also to the east of the site is a church, Riverton Heights Presbyterian. Page 2 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 II. RESPONSES TO DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL AND /LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS (TMC 18.60.050(A)). 1. Relationship of Structure to Site: a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition within the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. The site has been designed with the main vehicular site entry along S. 160th Street to allow for queuing of vehicles, which may at certain times of the day wait for entry to the secured parking facility. Existing landscaping on sides of the site entry has been retained where possible and supplemented with additional landscaping. The proposed new landscaping at the employee parking lot on the north side of the administration building will supplement the existing landscaping between the existing building and the landscaping along the street frontage. Interior landscaping at parking areas has also been used to break up the parking areas. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. The visual impact of the parking areas will be moderated through the required perimeter and interior landscaping. The impact will also be moderated through the use of site - obscuring fences where necessary and landscaping as determined through the Design Review process. See item 2.b below. To moderate the visual impact of the car service area (for the parking and maintenance of the rental cars), the new gas island canopy and car wash have been located at the middle of the site, approximately 406' feet north of S. 160 Street. The view of the above ground fuel tank is screened from S. 160th Street by the car wash building. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. All of the proposed commercial structures for the site: existing bowling alley used for car maintenance facility, existing theater concession building used for administrative offices and new gas island and car wash facility; are one -story in height with a shallow pitched roof and are compatible with one another. They are also compatible with other existing residential and commercial structures in the vicinity. 2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area: a. Harmony in texture, line, and masses is encouraged. To provide a harmonious character for the structures, the proposed buildings will have the same earth tone exterior colors, are one -story in character and have the same low -pitch roofline. The administrative office building and car maintenance facility are located in close proximity with a shared canopy /breezeway for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Building facades are interesting and entry to Administration and Maintenance facility is emphasized with the adjacent Plaza area and color. Page 3 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area: a. Harmony in texture, line, and masses is encouraged. To provide a harmonious character for the structures, the proposed buildings will have the same earth tone exterior colors, are one -story in character and have the same low -pitch roofline. The administrative office building and car maintenance facility are located in close proximity with a shared canopy /breezeway for both functional and aesthetic considerations. Building facades are interesting and entry to Administration and Maintenance facility is emphasized with the adjacent Plaza area and color. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. An approximate 10 -20' wide strip of landscaping, has been provided on the southern portion of the site alongside S. 160 St. providing a buffer to protect the existing residential development from impacts associated with the parking facility. Landscaping on the north, east and the west perimeters of the site has also been provided. Interior landscaping at parking areas has also been used to break up the parking areas. Existing buffer areas will retain existing trees, and additional shrubs and groundcovers added to supplement, any new planted buffer areas will be laid out per Code. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent, with the established neighborhood character. Not applicable as this is not a public building. Please note that this project will have buildings that are consistent and complementary to the existing established neighborhood character. These planned buildings will be scaled to relate to nearby structures. d. Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. As proposed, the access to the site is from S. 160th Street via existing entry drive. The secured guard booth and gated access to the site has been setback to allow for queuing of multiple vehicles entering the facility, once the vehicles have entered onto the site. The provision of a multiple vehicle queuing area appears to be more than adequate given the spread out arrivals of vehicles to the site. This project will have compatible pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation patterns on site to promote safety, efficiency and convenience for the car service center site. This site will limit the number of potential pedestrian and vehicular overlaps, provide striped pedestrian pathways that provide adequate visual distance to see moving vehicles, separate vehicle access and service loading zones from pedestrian access areas, and maintain landscaping so that it does not block pedestrian or vehicular site lines. Page 4 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. See response to item 1.a. This project is using existing curb cut entrances to the site and separating the Cendant employee parking area from the Cendant shuttler and maintenance car entry to the site. 3. Landscape & Site Treatment: a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. The existing site has existing paving and topography that will be reused for this proposed construction. The topography will. be slightly modified adjacent to the new gas island and car wash so that water will flow around, not into, this new building and canopy. The existing site's topography will be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. The proposed grades of sidewalks, vehicle entry and parking stalls do promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axes, and provide shade. The proposed landscape treatment continues and enhances the attractiveness of the existing entry to the site. Perimeter landscaping treatment provides an attractive transition to buffer the impacts of the car storage and parking from adjoining development. The landscape treatment for the lot interior also provides some relief to the large expanse of paving and stored cars. In addition, the supplemental landscaping located at the new employee parking area northwest of the administration building provides greater transition from the parking lot/roadway to existing street frontage landscaping along Tukwila International Boulevard. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. The location of the plant materials has been largely in response to the City's landscaping requirements. Where possible, we have placed and concentrated landscaping where we would anticipate minimal impact from vehicles and pedestrians. The required use of curbing should reduce potential injury from pedestrians and motor traffic to the proposed planting material. Landscaping will be maintained so that it does not block pedestrian or vehicular site lines. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees and shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. Not applicable. None of the proposed building sites limit planting. Page 5 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 f. Screening of service yards and other places, which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. g. The placement of service areas of the site has been carefully located to avoid any visual impact of their functions. Almost all servicing of the rental cars will take place within the proposed maintenance building. The above ground fuel tank will be partially screened by the car wash building. In addition, except for peak capacity periods (before and after holidays) when the lot will likely be full, most of the car storage parking will be directed away from the southern site perimeter, which adjoins existing development. The new trash enclosures will be enclosed with concrete block walls or chain link fence with wood slats. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. So noted. See landscape plan. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The proposed exterior lighting for the buildings will provide the necessary lighting for the functional aspects of the buildings while being attractive, provide for public safety, and minimize the visual impacts to the surrounding residential development. The proposed lighting recognizes that there is residential development on the south in the City of SeaTac. First the proposed structures have been located away from the existing residential development as far as possible. Second, the. proposed levels of lighting for under the entry canopy, the exterior of the office building and maintenance facility is provided in fixtures with cut -off lenses. (NOTE: The State of Washington regulates lighting for purposes of energy conservation). Since the most of the exterior lighting for the proposed project is for the parking areas, the objectives for the lighting are to provide adequate lighting consistent with the security considerations for the site and the users needs while minimizing potential impacts to the existing adjoining development. The effect of this lighting level standard is that it reduces the overall lighting level thus reducing energy consumption and making the facility more compatible with the adjoining residential development. Also, we have included exterior lighting fixtures which utilize cut -off features or are located to prevent lighting spill beyond the perimeters of the property particularly on the east side adjoining the existing residential area See further discussion in item 4.f and 5.b. Page 6 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650 -692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 4. Building Design: a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. Architectural style of the buildings for this project will have a unified modern style that will have a base, middle and roof line top. These buildings will be unified through the similar use of building materials of concrete walls, concrete block walls, plaster walls, anodized aluminum glass storefront doors and windows, metal man and rolling doors, metal fascias and canopies. These buildings will also be unified in their warm earth tone color palette. As noted in an earlier response, we have placed the buildings in a central location, which is most favorable to avoiding or reducing any impacts from the proposed use to the existing residential neighborhood to the south across S. 160th Street. The quality of the design is consistent with the proposed use and compatible with the Tukwila International Boulevard with surrounding uses permitted in the RC zoning district. The existing bowling alley and theater concession buildings are reused with slight exterior modifications as needed for Cendant's tenant uses. The style and the architecture of these building will be maintained and enhanced with the proposed tenant and building exterior improvements. The existing building's materials, finishes and colors currently are similar to those used in adjacent commercial and residential buildings. These materials, finishes and colors will be maintained in this building and be scaled to match the adjacent neighborhood. This project will have buildings that are consistent and complementary to the existing established neighborhood character. The use of concrete masonry units (CMU) and metal canopies for the new quick- turnaround facility (QTA), that is a car wash and gas island, is typical of many commercial local gas stations:. The newer gas stations also tend to use a metal "skin" on their canopies that give the canopies a more commercial appearance. The building is located in the middle of the site, away from S. 160 Street, to minimize any impacts to the adjoining neighborhood. Again, the buildings are set back a considerable distance from the existing residential development (approximately 406 feet from the QTA to S. 160 St.). The exterior is still consistent with the neighboring commercial structures to the west (Dollar Rent a Car with its unpainted galvanized corrugated metal roofing and siding). Page 7 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Although the proposed project includes buildings for commercial use, they are in harmony with both the residential development to the south through placement on the site and the selection of materials, finishes, and colors. The project is also in harmony with the existing commercial development on the west (car rental, hardware store, restaurant, etc.,). The proposed one -story buildings have the same or similar rooflines and use of the same or similar exterior colors. This project will have buildings that are consistent and complementary to the existing established neighborhood character. These planned buildings are be scaled to relate to nearby structures. c. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. The proportions of the proposed buildings complement one another and are consistent with the functional requirements for the permitted land use - a parking and car maintenance facility. The building components are consistent with the anticipated life of the buildings for the proposed use. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. The basic building color scheme consists of earth tone colors that are complementary to each other. None of the proposed colors would be considered "bright" or "brilliant ". e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. The air - conditioning for the office building and QTA facility will be placed under the roof except for the compressors. The compressor(s), similar to type of air conditioning found in single family development, will be pad mounted and placed in mechanical enclosures /rooms or on top of building's roofs with mechanical screens to enclose these units from sight. The air - conditioning and exhaust units for the maintenance bays will be located on the barrel vault roof, housed inside a mechanical equipment enclosure. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. The proposed exterior lighting uses attractive fixtures and Tight standards, the lighting level being at the appropriate level for the type and operation of the use, and is consistent with safety considerations. See response to item # 3.h and 5.b. Lighting is provided at all building entries and throughout site for pedestrian safety. Site lighting will have cut off shields that ensure that lighting is confined to the site and does not create glare or additional light on adjacent sites. Page 8 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 g. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. Each of the proposed buildings serves a distinct function which is reinforced by both the type of building utilized and location within the site. The height of the gas island canopy and new maintenance canopies must accommodate a vehicle clearance of 13' -6 ". The low structure with matching roof for the office adjoining the entry canopy adjoins the entry canopy to provide for close coordination for the staffing each administration and maintenance function (easily accommodates lunch, restroom, and other work breaks). And lastly, the maintenance building with bay doors for vehicles is further separated from the others and the surrounding residential development, but adjacent to the car wash and gas island building. 5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture: a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. See response to items 1.c, 2.a, 4.a and 4.b. b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to the site, landscape and buildings. Proposed site lights for the parking areas use existing light standards that are 30 feet in height with the addition of four new site lights. See attached site lighting plan. The recommended standard in the International Boulevard Design Guidelines calls for a minimum of 2 foot - candles using light standards from 10 to 15 feet in height. Our response to this standard is that in situations where there are security and safety issues (e.g., a rental car storage lot or a retail shopping area) a higher minimum foot - candles may be necessary. However, in this situation where access to the site is controlled through an entry gate and a security fence (also utilizing video cameras for all portions of the site), a higher level of lighting on the parking surface is required. There is lighting underneath the entry canopy and the entrances to all habitable buildings (office and maintenance building) are illuminated. Page 9 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 6. Consistency with adopted plans and regulations (TMC18.100.030): - i a. Demonstrate the manner in which the proposal is consistent with, carries out and helps implement applicable state laws and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the. City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila's Development Regulations and other official laws, policies and objectives of the City of Tukwila. This project will meet all applicable state laws and the regulations, policies, objectives and goals of the City of Tukwila. See attached plans submitted for this application. CRITERIA FOR BAR REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR (TMC 18.60.030 and 18.60.060(C). Applies to all developments in the Tukwila International Boulevard Corridor 1. Site Design a. Site Design Concept 1. Organize site design elements to provide an orderly and easily understood arrangement of building, landscaping, and circulation elements that support the functions of the site. The buildings, their entries, landscaping and site circulation has been located and organized per their respective site functions and provide an organized functional site. The site has been designed with the main site entry along S. 160th Street to allow for queuing of vehicles. Existing landscaping on all sides of the site entry has been retained and supplemented with additional landscaping. The proposed new landscaping at the employee parking lot on the north side of the administration building will supplement the existing landscaping between the existing building and the landscaping along the street frontage. Site fencing has been placed on the interior side of the landscaping so that the landscaping provides a street edge. b. Relationship to Street Front 1. Organize site design elements to create a distinct street edge, and minimize parking between structures and street. The new site perimeter fencing has been located at the interior part of the perimeter site landscaping so that the landscaping and fencing provide a distinct street edge along S. 160th Street and Tukwila International Boulevard. Page 10 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 teAktiC 2. Orient at least one building entry to a major public street. The Administration and Maintenance Buildings are orientated towards Tukwila International Boulevard with their main employee entrances and parking areas located off Tukwila International Boulevard. c. Street Corners 1. Emphasize the importance of street corners through building location, the provision of pedestrian access, special site features and /or landscape features. Not applicable. This site does not have a street corner. d. Continuity of Site with Adjacent Sites 1. Maintain visual and functional continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring properties through setbacks, building massing, circulation and landscaping, where appropriate. Visual continuity between the proposed commercial development and the adjacent commercial and residential sites is provided by a harmony of colors and materials used in the building improvements for the Administration and Maintenance Facilities and new QTA building. Building massing for these proposed buildings is one story and matches the scale and massing of these adjacent properties. Building are set in the middle of the site so that buildings are set back from other buildings. Landscaping at the perimeter of the site will be harmonious with adjacent sites and blend in with the existing landscaping. There is no functional or circulation continuity between this site and adjacent site as this site is secured for rental car use. It's site use and function is different and does not relate to the adjacent commercial and residential use. e. Shared Facilities 1. Incorporate opportunities for joint development of sites where there is potential for common building walls, shared driveways, landscaping, or other shared facilities Not applicable as this site's use and function is different from adjacent sites. Page 11 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 f. Site Design for Safety 1. Minimize conflicts between drivers and pedestrians through the siting of structures, location of circulation elements, landscape design, and placement of signs. t destrian walkways from Tukwila International Boulevard 160th Street to Administration and Maintenance buildings are added to further define the pedestrian path to these buildings. The Administration and Maintenance Buildings also has a covered walkway between them that does not allow vehicular circulation so those pedestrians can flow freely between these buildings. Car shuttlers will primarily access the QTA building by car, so that pedestrian access to this building from the Administration and maintenance facilities is minimized. A striped pedestrian walkway from the Administration and Maintenance buildings to the QTA is provided for any potential pedestrian use. 2. Design and site structures to maximize site surveillance opportunities from buildings and public streets. Buildings are located at the middle of the site so that site surveillance opportunities of these buildings and street entries to the site from these buildings is maximized. 3. Provide adequate lighting levels in all pedestrian areas, including building entries, along walkways, parking areas, and other public areas. Adequate lighting for pedestrians, building entries and parking areas, shown on the attached site lighting plan, will be provided throughout the site and perimeter of buildings in all pedestrian areas for security of employees and cars. 4. Design landscaping so that long term growth will not interfere with site lighting and surveillance. Landscaping will be designed so that Tong -term growth will not interfere with site or building lighting and surveillance. 5. Use durable, high quality materials in site furnishings and features for ease of maintenance. Exteriors of buildings are finished with concrete block and painted concrete and plaster finished walls that are durable, high quality and easy to maintain. Page 12 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 g. Siting and Screening of Service Areas 1. Minimize the visual and aural impacts, of service areas such as loading docks, trash and recycling collection points, utility maintenance areas, etc., through site design, landscaping and screening. Trash areas are screened from view with chain Zink gates/ wood slats and concrete masonry walls. Trash area at QTA is screened from S. 160th Street by the QTA building and canopy. Existing building to the south of the maintenance facility screens trash area at Maintenance building. h. Natural Features and Sensitive Areas 1. Preserve natural features such as existing topography, significant trees or wooded areas, wetlands and /or watercourses and incorporate them into the overall site, where appropriate. n- ' The existing site has existing paving and topography that will be ■44l�� _ _ reused for this project. The topography will be slightly modified 0%v around the new QTA facility so that water will flow around, not into, this structure. This site does not have significant trees, wooded areas, wetlands or watercourses. 2. Design and site structures on hillsides to minimize the visual and environmental impact of development in these locations. Not applicable. This site does not have hillsides. 3. Employ site design techniques that take advantage of and /or enhance visual focal points along the corridor, where feasible. Buildings are located at the middle of the site to take advantage of view corridors from this site to the adjacent roadways. Page 13 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 i. Surface Stormwater Detention Facilities 1 1. Integrate . water quality treatment techniques such as biofiltration swales and ponds with overall site design, where possible and appropriate. Biofiltration swales and ponds are not applicable to this site based on its current site water drainage system. The existing site drainage system will be retained as existing. The headwaters to Gilliam Creek begin in a shallow ravine located on the undeveloped easterly side of the site. Discharge to Gilliam Creek from this site is via a 36 -inch diameter pipe that traverses the southerly portion of the site. Areas off -site to the west drain through this system. Existing site drainage currently ties into this piped system prior to discharge to Gilliam Creek. Pedestrian Circulation 1. Provide paved pedestrian walkways that connect all buildings and entries of buildings within a site. See f.1 above. 2. Provide a paved pedestrian walkway from the public sidewalk(s) to the main entry of developments; where a development fronts two `") streets, access must be provided from both streets. See f.1 above. 3. Provide pedestrian connections from the on -site pedestrian �• network to walkways on adjacent properties and to other off -site destinations, where feasible. A man gate is provided from this site on the west side to El Charro Restaurant. Other uses do not apply, as their function is not compatible with rental car uses. 4. Support pedestrian movement between properties and from private property to public rights -of -way by providing facilities that traverse natural or man -made barriers, where appropriate. See j.3 above. Page 14 Prepared by Slunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 5. Provide direct pedestrian walkways from businesses in commercial areas to transit stops, and /or provide additional' transit amenities, where appropriate and feasible. Pedestrian walkways are provided from the Administration and Maintenance buildings to Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 160th Street. Other uses will not have continuing pedestrian walkways, as their function is not compatible with rental car uses. k. Pedestrian Amenities 1. Incorporate pedestrian amenities in site design to increase the utility of the site and enhance the overall pedestrian environment in the corridor, where possible. Pedestrian amenities will consist of seating and benches in the covered plaza area between the Administration and Maintenance buildings, bike racks with weather protection, pedestrian striped crosswalks for adjacent building access and security lighting around these buildings. This site is a secured car rental maintenance and service site. No through traffic of pedestrians will be allowed so that car security can be maintained and theft of cars or car parts can be minimized. This site is a car service center site that will primarily be used by car shuttlers in cars. Other adjacent property uses will not have continuing pedestrian walkways with this project, as their function is not compatible with rental car uses. I. Vehicular Circulation 1. Minimize conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. See f.1 above. 2. Minimize the amount of space devoted to vehicular circulation by limiting access driveways; ensuring that internal site circulation is efficient; and /or taking advantage of opportunities for shared driveways. Vehicular circulation on site is designed to be efficient to the functional needs of the rental car service center site. There will be no shared driveways with existing adjacent property functions as their functions are not compatible with rental car uses (with the exception of the potential future Washington State Police facility located in the southeast part of this site). Fenced area of site shall be fully secured so that cars or car parts are not stolen. Page 15 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 5. Provide direct pedestrian walkways from businesses in commercial areas to transit stops, and /or provide additional transit amenities, where appropriate and feasible. Pedestrian walkways are provided from the Administration and Maintenance buildings to Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 160th Street. Other uses will not have continuing pedestrian walkways, as their function is not compatible with rental car uses. k. Pedestrian Amenities 1. Incorporate pedestrian amenities in site design to increase the utility of the site and enhance the overall pedestrian environment in the corridor, where possible. Pedestrian amenities will consist of seating and benches in the covered plaza area between the Administration and Maintenance buildings, bike racks with weather protection, pedestrian striped crosswalks for adjacent building access and security lighting around these buildings. This site is a secured car rental maintenance and service site. No through traffic of pedestrians will be allowed so that car security can be maintained and theft of cars or car parts can be minimized. This site is a car service center site that will primarily be used by car shuttlers in cars. Other adjacent property uses will not have continuing pedestrian walkways with this project, as their function is not compatible with rental car uses. I. Vehicular Circulation 1. Minimize conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic. See f.1 above. 2. Minimize the amount of space devoted to vehicular circulation by limiting access driveways; ensuring that internal site circulation is efficient; and /or taking advantage of opportunities for shared driveways. Vehicular circulation on site is designed to be efficient to the functional needs of the rental car service center site. There will be no shared driveways with existing adjacent property functions as their functions are not compatible with rental car uses (with the 4 exception of the potential future Washington State Police facility , located in the southeast part of this sl e . ence area o sl e s a I be fully secured so that cars or car parts are not stolen. Page 15 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 m. Parking 1. Minimize the amount of space devoted to parking by taking advantage of shared parking and /or methods for reducing parking demand, where possible. Not applicable as this site is a rental car site with open parts of the site used for rental car parking storage. 2. Building Design a. Architectural Concepts 1. Develop an architectural concept for structure(s) on the site that conveys a cohesive and consistent thematic or stylistic statement, and is responsive to the functional characteristics of the development. The architectural concept for this site is three fold: have modern buildings with a base, middle and top; have a warm earth tone color and material palette and compatibility of adjacent structures scale. Each of the three buildings will have a base, middle and top with the horizontal elements emphasized. These three buildings will have the similar building materials, which is accentuated with the same color scheme. See 2.a.2. These buildings will also be scaled to be compatible with and are set back in distance to adjacent structures on other properties. 2. Ensure that development on sites with more than one structure employ similar or complementary architectural styles and /or are related in scale, form, color, and use of materials and /or detailing. The new QTA facility is designed to match the current style, scale, proportions, materials and detailing of the existing theater concessions and bowling alley buildings used for the Administration and Maintenance buildings respectively. The same materials (concrete block, concrete wall, plaster, metal fascia and canopies, aluminum glass storefront doors and windows) and color scheme of earth tone colors used on the two existing buildings will also be used for the new QTA building. The new QTA building will be complementary to the existing building' style, color, material finishes and scale. Page 16 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 b. Architectural Relationships 1. Provide for visual and functional continuity between the proposed development and adjacent and neighboring structures when these structures demonstrate an appropriate level of architectural quality. Buildings are centered in the middle of the site to leave vehicular circulation and car shuttling functions at the perimeter of the site. These building provide a visual continuity in using similar building materials and colors found in the existing neighborhood. 3. Reduce the apparent scale of large commercial buildings located in the Neighborhood Commercial Center district and located adjacent to residential districts. Not applicable as site is located in Regional Commercial district. This project consists of small scale one -story buildings. c. Building Elements, Details, and Materials 1. Provide distinctive building corners at street intersections through the use of special architectural elements and detailing, and pedestrian- oriented features where possible (see definition of pedestrian friendly facade). Not applicable as project is not located on a street corner. 2. Relate the design and scale of building elements and details to the building's overall form and massing. The design and scale of building elements use the same building materials and color palette in a similar form and detailing. Building massing is broken down into components of column /pilasters and beams and reveals and shadow lines further break up walls. Use different colors to further emphasize uilding panels is also used to re • uc= :.' • g.t_Metal canopies are set in front of buildings to create an open foreground to a solid building The Maintenance and QTA building's mass is also reduced by clustering smaller buildings and activities around the main building. Page 17 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 3. Employ architectural details that are appropriate to the architectural character of the building. Architectural details for the doors, windows, metal canopies and building walls will be similar throughout the project and are appropriate to the overall architectural character of these buildings. See 2.c.2. Utilize durable, high quality building materials that contribute to the overall appearance, ease of maintenance, and longevity of the building. Durable, .high quality and easily maintainable building materials of painted plaster, painted concrete block, pre- finished metal canopies and soffits, anodized aluminum glass storefronts, painted metal doors and painted glu -lam beams will be used so that this development will have a high quality finish and appearance for the life of this project and can be easily maintained. Integrate the design and placement of exterior lighting with the architectural design and materials. Exterior lights will be located with the building's exterior design and materials taken into effect, so that lighting design is integrated with the overall building design. d. Pedestrian - Oriented Features 1. Provide pedestrian - friendly facades (see Definitions) on the ground floor of all buildings that face public streets and entry facades that face parking areas. The Administration and Maintenance entry canopy will have a pedestrian friendly facade with warm earth tones to welcome employees to these buildings. 2. Provide special treatment for large blank walls (see Definitions) that are visible from pedestrian walkways and parking areas. Large blank walls are broken down into smaller components with changes in materials from plaster /concrete block to metal fascia and canopies. These walls will also have pilasters and small offsets /shadowlines in these walls, especially at corners and panel changes. Color is also used to provide variety in wall finish and appearance. Page 18 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 Enhance building entries .through the use of weather protection, landscaping, pedestrian amenities and /or distinctive architectural features. The existing Administration and Maintenance buildings have an entry canopy that will remain for weather protection and a distinctive architectural feature. The Maintenance building will have new metal canopies on the east and west elevations for sun control and on the south for weather protection of car entries into the Maintenance bays. The QTA building will have a gas island canopy for weather protection of Cendant's employees during the car refueling process. These new canopies will also act as distinctive, architectural• features to add an open foreground to these solid buildings. The Administration and Maintenance buildings will also have separate striped pedestrian walkways from Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 160th Street. Perimeter landscaping around the site and interior landscape islands are also provided to further enhance the site. e. Mechanical Equipment 1. Locate and /or screen roof - mounted mechanical equipment to minimize visibility from public streets, building approaches, and adjacent properties. The Administration building will have air conditioning compressors mounted either in the existing mechanical room or on the roof of this building. If these compressors are mounted on the roof, they will be screened from view by the existing parapet wall so that they will not be seen from eye level. The compressors and exhaust equipment for the Maintenance facility will be housed inside a mechanical equipment enclosure at the peak of the roof as shown on the elevations. The mechanical equipment for the QTA will be mounted inside the building or on the roof. If mounted on the roof, the perimeter parapet wall will hide this equipment from pedestrian eye level and the parapet wall will be taller than this equipment. 2. Locate and /or screen utility meters and other ground level utility equipment to minimize visibility from the street. ��. Utility meters and other ground level utility equipment will be located to minimize visibility from the adjacent streets. Page 19 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 3. Landscape Design a. Landscape Design 1. Develop a landscape design concept that demonstrates a clear and appropriate aesthetic statement. The public frontage design will take advantage of the existing bed layout and trees of the existing theater and bowling alley building entry. These elements will be incorporated into a simple but bold landscape entry design scaled to the boulevard and buildings. The space available will allow for a 'non - traditional' entry. Plant material will build on the recently planted boulevard edge. 2. Develop a landscape design concept that reinforces site design and fulfills the functional requirements of the development, including screening and buffering. The new landscape plan provides for landscaping screening of the new parking area parallel with the boulevard, which effectively screens the parking lot depth. Existing parking lot trees will be retained where possible, pending immediate scale. Existing landscape buffers will be upgraded to meet current Tukwila code. Site and building entries will be clearly defined, as well as the delineation of public- secure space. 3. Ensure that the landscape design reinforces and complements plantings in the public right -of -way. Plant material will be thoughtfully considered and will incorporate the selected boulevard species into the design. Drought tolerance and appearance of planting will also be carefully considered. b. Planting Design 1. Select plant materials that reinforce the landscape design concept, and are appropriate to their location in terms of hardiness; maintenance needs, and growth characteristics. Proposed plant material will 'lean' towards the drought tolerant species. Existing trees have been considered in the new design of landscape site plan. Page 20 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 2. Incorporate existing significant trees, wooded areas, and /or vegetation in the planting plan where they contribute to overall landscape design. Existing buffer areas will retain existing trees, and additional shrubs and groundcovers added to supplement existing planters. All newly planted buffer areas will be laid out per Tukwila Code. New plantings will complement existing, recently planted buffers. 4. Signs a. Signage Concept 1. Provide signage that is integrated with the architectural concept in scale, detailing, use of color, materials, and placement. Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. b. Sign Placement 1. Provide signage that is oriented to both pedestrians and motorists in design and placement. Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. 2. Provide adequate directional signage on site and building identification numbers that are legible from the street(s). Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. 3. Integrate freestanding signs with the landscaping. Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. c. Sign Design 1. Consider both day- and night -time viewing in the design, placement, and lighting of signage. Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. 2. Provide durable, high quality materials and finishes for signage. Not applicable as no signs will be provided with this project. Page 21 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 III. RESPONSES TO APPLICABLE DESIGN REVIEW POLICIES A. All Commercial Areas: Goal: "Commercial districts that are visually attractive and add value to the community, are visitor and pedestrian friendly, are designed with pride and constructed with quality workmanship, are secure and safe with adequate lighting and convenient access, are uncongested with smooth - flowing traffic patterns, are well- maintained with adequate streetscape landscaping, and are wholesome and in harmony with adjacent uses" (Goal 1.7). 1. The design includes consideration of features that reflect characteristics of Tukwila's history (1.2.4). These buildings will be pedestrian friendly, are designed with pride and will be constructed by quality workmanship by a local general contractor. This project will have buildings that are safe and secure with adequate building perimeter and site lighting. This project will have functional pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns around these buildings that are safe and continuous with smooth and efficient traffic flows. Landscaping is provided around the perimeter of the site for a street edge and at interior parking islands to break up the site and parking areas. This project is harmonious to the existing neighborhood in design, scale, materials and colors. The design for the proposed use does not include any distinct features, which clearly reflect characteristics of Tukwila's history, other than perhaps the bowed glu -lam beams at the existing bowling alley. 2. Fencing and landscape buffers are provided between commercial and residential uses (1.7.4). Buffering in the form of landscaping and other features and perimeter security fencing have been provided along the street frontage at S. 160th Street. An 8 -foot high fence, protected by an interior steel guardrail is proposed for the entire site. Page 22 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bay-shore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 3. The . development provides adequate parking and lighting (1.7.3). Adequate parking for Cendant employees and vendors will be provided with access through an existing curb cut along Tukwila International Boulevard. See parking calculations on site plan, sheet A1.1. The proposed lighting for the parking area will be controlled through cut -off shades on the specific fixtures to prohibit light and glare spilling to adjacent property. These site lights will be sufficient for security purposes. The proposed use is not seen as . an intrusion on the neighborhood, but as a complimentary use given their exposure. Proposed lighting for the parking areas will use existing light standards that are 30 feet in height. Parking to comply with ADA standards will consist of four handicap stalls located adjacent to the administration building. There is lighting underneath the gas island canopy and the entrances to all habitable buildings (administration and maintenance buildings) are illuminated. The proposed parking lot lighting will be sufficient for any employee pedestrian access from the parking area to the office or maintenance facility entrances. 4. Where open spaces and trails are included in the development, they are designed not to interfere with the reasonable use of adjacent private property (1.10.11), and they designed and constructed in a manner that is safe for all users and adjacent property owners (1.11.7). Because of the security issue no connecting trails are proposed for the project. 5. In areas of concentrated commercial and retail activity, the development is connected by pedestrian facilities to the City's trail network, where feasible (1.11.4). See response to item # 4. The - commercial development is not concentrated and bears little connection with the adjoining commercial uses. Page 23 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila - 9/27/04 B. TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (TUC) ZONE Goal 10.2 "Encourage and allow a central focus for the Tukwila Urban Center, with natural and built environments that are attractive, functional, and distinctive, and supports a range of mixed uses promoting business, shopping, recreation, entertainment, and mixed use residential opportunities:" 1. Wherever possible, the development provides an interior vehicular connection between adjacent parking areas (10.2.4). This project has continuous vehicular circulation aisles around the buildings so that all areas of the site are connected with continuous vehicular drive aisles. These drive aisles are also used for fire truck access and are shown dashed on the site plan, sheet A1.1. Connection to adjacent site circulation is not applicable, as this is a secured rental car site. 2. Where adjacent to a park, the development responds to or enhances the open space network and public amenities (e.g. by providing connections to open spaces (10.2.9). Not applicable as this site is not adjacent to a park. 3. The development should be designed with an appropriate scale and proportion; pedestrian- oriented features and streetfront activity areas, such as ground floor windows, modulated facades, rich details in materials and signage; quality landscaping; an appropriate relationship to adjacent sites; an overall building quality; and with sensitivity to important features such as Green River and Tukwila Pond (10.2.7). Pedestrian - oriented features of pedestrian crosswalks and access paths from S. 160th Street and Tukwila International Boulevard, building and site security lighting and bench areas at the Plaza will be provided with this project. Landscaping will not act as a pedestrian or vehicular visual barrier for pedestrian safety. The plaza will also be used as a pedestrian weather protected area for building employees to access the Administration and maintenance facilities. Page 24 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 4. Parking areas should be designed with appropriate screening, landscaping and corner site /parking relationships/00.2.6) Parking areas are surrounded with perimeter landscaping for appropriate screening and have additional interior landscaped islands to break up the parking areas. Corners of parking areas also are landscaped to further screen the cars. See landscape plan. 5. The development should achieve a high - quality design; contribute to the creation of hospitable pedestrian environments through site design techniques, such as integration of architectural /site design /landscape elements and co- existence of auto /transit/pedestrian traffic; should be designed to maximize pedestrian safety and convenience; and should incorporate physical and natural elements that enhance the area's overall aesthetic, including street orientation (10.2.3). See III.A.1, 2 and 3 and III.B.3. 6. The development should generally support existing plans, policies and programs designed to improve open space and other public amenities in the Tukwila Urban Center (e.g. projects adjacent to parks recognize and complement open spaces; open spaces are oriented with access to sunlight and are designed to promote security and visibility). (10.2.9). This development will support existing plans, policies and programs designed to improve open spaces by orientating existing and new buildings with access to sunlight and to not infringe on adjacent property owner's access to sunlight. The large expanse of space around the buildings will have great access to sunlight and view corridors. This project is not adjacent to a park and this park section is therefore not applicable to this project. Page 25 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc. City of Tukwila 9/27/04 C. General Transportation Corridors: Goal 1.8: "A more attractive form of commercial development along major streets in the community, in which buildings and plantings are prominent and oriented to pedestrians, transit, and automobiles" (Goal 1.8). NOTE: Although the development is part of the SRO ownership, the proposed project is oriented to S. 160th Street and not International Boulevard South. In addition, the City's design policies have been written for a more conventional development consisting of principally building(s) with supportive facilities such as parking and other related facilities. In the proposed development, parking is the principal use with the building playing a supportive role for the primary use - parking. 1. The development provides through -block pedestrian connections (1.8.5). The project as proposed provides pedestrian connections from the existing buildings to Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 160th Street. Through block pedestrian connections will not be provided as this is a secured site. Additional pedestrian circulation from the public, other than Cendant's staff, may promote car or car part theft on this site and therefore will not be allowed. 2. Building facades provide pedestrian weather protection, see - through glass and distinctive rooflines. On minor facades adjacent to secondary streets or pedestrian paths, the development incorporates interesting and pedestrian- friendly features (1.8.7). See 2.a.1, 2; 2.d.3, 2.c.2, III.A.1, 2 and 3; and III.B.3. The site is entirely fenced and monitored for security reasons. It is not a "public site" in the sense that there would potentially be pedestrians crossing the project site to get to another building or use in the vicinity. The only users of the site are those who are Cendant's employees that have driven to the site. This is not a public site that allows pedestrians to transverse this site, as it is a secured site. Operationally, the Cendant employee arrives at the site and is directed where to park and is picked up (at their vehicle) by an available shuttle van and transported along with other employees to an off -site facility. 3. Within commercial areas, the development provides pedestrian pathways between sidewalks and building entrances, and between adjacent properties and buildings, thereby ensuring that parking lots are not barriers to pedestrians (8.1.2). See item f.1. 4. Parking areas include landscaped interior areas as well as perimeter landscape strips (8.1.4). The parking areas include both interior and perimeter landscaping. See landscape plan. Page 26 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 Design Review Application Cendant Car Rental Group, Inc, City of Tukwila 9/27/04 5. Mechanical equipment and trash /recycling areas are incorporated into the overall design and screened from view; roof designs conceal equipment; dumpsters are not located within front yards. All mechanical equipment will be screened by being enclosed in an equipment room or a rooftop enclosure. The above ground fuel tank will be partially screened by the car wash building. 6. Roof lines are prominent and contribute to the distinct character of the area (8.1.12). See response included in contained in item 8. The one -story buildings are centralized features of the proposed 15.1 acre (658,723 sq.ft.) development. These roof lines are similar and will contribute to the character of the neighborhood buildings. 7 Where appropriate, the development should provide or allow for future facilities /improvements that support transit use (1.8.8). The Cendant employees of the proposed use would arrive by vehicle. Arriving by transit is not consistent with the type of proposed use. It is, however, possible to arrive at the site via public transit. The nearest transit stop for route # 170 is located at the northeast corner of Old Military Road and S. 160th Street. The next nearest transit stop for routes # 171 and 194 is located at the northeast corner of International Boulevard South and S. 160th Street. 8. Building, parking and pedestrian facilities should be designed with compatible locations and configurations (e.g. locating parking in back or on the side of buildings, buildings pulled out to street) (1.8.2). Parking is the primary use of the site. The entry to the proposed facility has been placed away from existing residential development. Two of the existing buildings are located adjacent to one another (administrative office and maintenance buildings with canopy /breezeway) and placed near the middle of the site because of their operational needs. The third building (QTA) has been located again in the middle of the site away from the existing residential use on the south side of S. 1601 h St. This building has been designed to allow for minor fueling and washing of rental cars. The layout of these buildings in the middle of the site is compatible with the neighborhood buildings. IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A. Special Permission Application (Attachment B) No additional applications made with this package B. Responses to Tukwila International Boulevard Design Manual (Attachment C). Included in this attachment are our responses to the Design Criteria contained in the City's International Boulevard Design Manual. Page 27 Prepared by Blunk Demattei Associates 1555 Bayshore Hwy., #300, Burlingame, CA 94010 650- 692 -9911 fax 650- 692 -0181 014000 - 41/0043163 AVIS DOMESTIC Check Number: VOUCk,;;E . * -4 NUMBER ` _ INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE BATCH NUMBER GROSS AMOUNT NET AMOUNT 391264 SEPA 09 -23 -04 RR034 500.00 500.00 AVIS Rent a Car System, Inc. TOTAL 300 Centre Pointe Drive, Virginia Beach, VA 23462 AMOUNT 500.00 500.00 A . 300 Cet Virginia ntre Beach Poin V e , irgi Drive 23462 nia m Bank of America Atlanta, GA PAY PAY TO THE ORDER OF Five hundred and 00 /100 Dollars CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD SUITE 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 CO BK 02 -02 Avis features GM cars. CHECK NUMBER VOID AFTER 90 DAYS CHECK DATE 09/23/04 64-1278 611 NET AMOUNT $500.00 AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. edA4%;1 A#)4Lv*---\* r g U g • • • CITY OF TUKWILA TUKWILA, WASHINGTON TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD SOUTH 152ND STREET TO SOUTH 138TH STREET SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS SHT. NO. DESCRIPTION OF. DRAWINGS KP1 P1. - P6 KEY PLAN PLAN SHEETS STREET TREES VICINITY MAP Perteet Inc. p 253- 984 -7138 RECEIVED OCT 0 4 2004 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS CITY OFFICIALS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS JIM HAGGERTON - PRESIDENT JOAN HERNANDEZ DENNIS ROBERTSON PAM CARTER JOE H. DUFFIE PAM LINDER DAVID FENTON CITY ADMINISTRATION STEVE MULLET, MAYOR RHONDA BERRY, CITY ADMINISTRATOR JANE CANTU, CITY CLERK JIM MORROW, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTING CITY ENGINEER BQB GIBERSON, P.E. TUKWILA N:tprojectt24034 Street Trees\24034k • T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. SEE SHEET P1 SEE SHEET P2 SEE SHEET P3 10 +00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. —ENGINEERING—STREETS—WATER—SEWER—PARKS—BUILDING- 4 by design drawn MH NRN date 06/04 06/04 checked prof a+9 proj dir RSH 06/04 field bk nc ok1 Perteet Inc. I 253- 984 -7138 36 +50 4t4 0 SR 99 TUKWILA KING COUNTY MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. JULY. 2002 no date revisions STREET TREES - KEY PLAN file no: 24034KP1 scale: 1 -100 date: 8- 23-04 \ N., ■ ■ - - - `.. �. - - t" -,L--, - - - �...� .� - - . .�.... �. .� .. is _ _ SEE SHEET P1 SEE SHEET P2 SEE SHEET P3 10 +00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. —ENGINEERING—STREETS—WATER—SEWER—PARKS—BUILDING- 4 by design drawn MH NRN date 06/04 06/04 checked prof a+9 proj dir RSH 06/04 field bk nc ok1 Perteet Inc. I 253- 984 -7138 36 +50 4t4 0 SR 99 TUKWILA KING COUNTY MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 INTERNATIONAL BLVD. JULY. 2002 no date revisions STREET TREES - KEY PLAN file no: 24034KP1 scale: 1 -100 date: 8- 23-04 SEE ABOVE UK� I► D .Wi 1 a„ ■. =LVD. STA 10 +00.00 P. .00 P.O.T. T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. • 10 +0 BEGIN PROJEC T STA. 10 +00.00 SR 99 MP 20 6611400 tUK\VILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. 12+00 0 O 1 L 15+00 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. 16+00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT — ENGINEERING— STREETS— WATER— SEWER — PARKS— BUILDING- by dote designed v 07/04 drown JA 07/04 checked SV 07/04 prof enq SV 07/04 proj dir Odd bit nC WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES urOOnAM At IO OOMI ansa►TIORAL n.AXIMO MO DOM Oa TOt? AVOIDS IR MOO MAO= 11011 gamma. WAQml07'OM COM TALMO.MFe0T7 MO ON RECNOTOOD SUPION GEORGE No. OM no dote • CONSTRUCTION NOTES O 1PLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 GENERAL NOTE$ 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILfT1ES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE 0 20 40 90 SCALE IN FEET SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. KING COUNTY JULY. 2004 reviaiane STREET TREES — PLAN 4t4 0 tal) roe no: 24034P01 sole: -2A dote: 7-30 -04 T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. 0 CD w w U) 0 0 M N F- W Z J 0 I- a PUBLIC WORKS DEPT by • designedSV drown JA — ENGINEERING — STREETS— WATER — SEWER— PARKS — BUILOINC- checked SV date 07/04 07/04 07/04 prof eng SV 07/04 proj dIr 'field bk e WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LADpDM6 A/QQ1f01VR YCi11■11OIf4L FLAMM AND t>rON Ian 1112s'r ATOMS CUM > DID OA1'l'7Z. WAtiIDtOeON f161 1 TII.>1 S.44&s111 WAX 41•441541107 S171IE OF RECISMENO STEPHEN tE CERIMIED Ns 2.36 • CQNSTRUCTION NOTES OPLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. KING COUNTY JULY. 2004 no dote revisions STREET TREES - PLAN U /Ile no: 24033P02 settle: 1 " -20' dote: 7-30-041 T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. a If 0 -11 /_..., eat n n mu Y 111111ii PM Li JENA 1�7 /ll�J!�lr MG= ILI1011F ,� a WAIL.111111/ N.B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — ENGINEERING — STREETS— WATER — SEWER— PARKS— BUILDINC- by designeds1 drown .14 oky Ito 5 dote 07/04 07/04 checked SW 07/04 proj erg SV 07/04 proj dir bk « WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAlmf6A/� A1ONIeI07Y0 IOf.7IATIONAj R.AMO= AND ME M lift MAT AVOS4o, GUM MAIM fff s ATP[+. WAf1m101014 Mat S11.1 0.W4/10 pAZIOFW.OfV/ ENE CP - INDIRSION RENDERED LANDSCAPE STEPHEN NORSE 9:MAIZE COINED N2 M RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES OPLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. KING COUNTY JULY, 2004 no date revisions STREET TREES — PLAN 4t 0 Emi U file no: 24033P03 scale: 1' -20' date: 7 -30 -041 T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. 4 e 0$ r alp e' —J i I wir MATCH LINE STA -iJ - iv.. —' 1U U) —J 2 U Vg- PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — ENGINEERING— STREETS — WATER — SEWER — PARKS — BUILDING- designed by Sy date 07/04 drawn JA 07/04 checked Sy prof eng SW praj dir Add Nk n• 07/04 07/04 WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES LAXISIQAN1 A1a07lOW1t 111113111141110NAL 1LN01:0110 MID bile lite MOOT AVENUE suns NUM= 616 SEATTLE. wmatarM'Oet 16101 TII.aN•eli0eli •A0JM.NO.000'► STATE OF FN NEGISTERED LONCIIICAPE AICN MENEM GURU CERTIFIED Na 235 no dote revisions • CONSTRUCTION NOTES OPLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 1. GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. KING COUNTY JULY, 2004 STREET TREES - PLAN file no: 24033PO4 scale: 1'+•20' dote: 7-30-041 S 6 • CONSTRUCTION NOTES u.1 O PLANT STREET TREE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 7 W GENERAL NOTES = 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION lJ l 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE PLANTING N SCHEDULE O O 0 1— I 8-1 USED TIRES ENGINE OVERHAUL i • li•= AMIIsEnl.m. fi 33 a C I ECON0_L0pGI M PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. — ENGINEERING— STREETS — WATER — SEWER— PARKS— BUILDING- designed drawn by SV JA date 07/04 07/04 checked SV 07/04 Pali eng SV 07/04 Frei dir field bk nc WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES , AM.r•• ANC101l01CU U Z►TpgL PIJIIOIIDO AND =NOM UM MST AVE 4UE BURS NUMB= 600 6lATRi, WAlw6TON 06101 613400-441 661171) PAI201- 4411-0107 REGISTERED STATE OF WASHINGTON UNDSCAPE 111121 GEORGE 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. KING COUNTY JULY, 2004 CERTIFIED No. 235 no date STREET TREES - PLAN ›wi H U file no: 24033P05 stole: 1'20' date: 7-30-041 s ' 1908 n lY Cfl I'- !Ai LIJ U) LLI LLI V) O to N LLI z J I- Q AO O o o v _e Ems i 111111111111• =i:.ii � -::i� T. 23 N. R. 4E. W.M. •2 C TUKWALA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. 57+00% Il .41.. 411Ib.. wpm MIN MFAMW MOW!" 41..1 611111 f w w Mgr WM..�.!_.� Al •. 'A. ®9 4e AV. oa.0 o) 1' WIDE CHAINLOCK TREE — TIE PLASTIC LOCKING ROPE USE 4 PER TREE 10' -0" BVC TREATED STAKES DRIVEN TO REFUSAL INTO UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL MIN. 24" DEPTH USE 11110 PER TREE. SECURE TIE TO STAKE W/ ROOFING NAIL. DERBY'S I' TAVERN I PEEL. BACK AND REMOVE TOP THIRD OF BURLAP AND BASKET u u 12' GREATER THAN ROOTBALZ REMOVE (4) 2' x 4' x 3' THICK PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS FOR TREE INSTALLATION. AFTER TREE PLANTING. CONCRETE PANELS SHALL BE INSTALLED CN RECOMPACTED SOIL FLUSH WITH SIDEWALK GRADE. PROVIDE. INSTALL. FLUSH. AND PROVIDE FUNCTION OF 10' LENGTH DOUBLE LOOP OF NETAFIN CV DRIPPER TUBING EMITTING 9 GPH PER TREE CONNECT TO EIOSTING 3/4" PVC 90' ELI.. FURNISH AND INSTALL WITH FITTINGS. ..I TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. PUBLIC WORKS DOSING 3/4' PVC IRRIGATION PIPE DEPT. — ENGINEERING — STREETS— WATER — SEWER— PARKS— BUILDING- by 0 date designed SW 10/04 drown JA 10/04 04. OP n Oa.0 UP 59+00 'TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE TREES SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SITE /CONDITIONS • CONSTRUCTION NOTES PLANT STREET TREE PER 1 DETAIL ON SHEET 7 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES DURING TREE INSTALLATION 2. SEE SHEET 7 FOR TREE SCHEDULE SPACING QTY. AS SHOWN 28 AS SHOWN 50 CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS INCENSE CEDAR S' -11' HT.. B&B SELECT ACER PLATANODES vor. COwMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY 2" CAL MIN.. B&B SELECT COLUNNARBROAD/ PARKWAY (CLUSTER GROUPS CF THREE of "EMERALD QUEEN (3) TO FIVE (5)( 'IF FIFTY (50) ACER PLATANQDES var. 'COLUIIIARBROAD/ PARKWAY ARE PROVEN UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY PROPOSE TO SUBSTITUTE UP TO 25 ACER PLATANOIDES var. 'EMERALD QUEEN' NORWAY MAPLES FOR UP TO 25 OF THE ACER PLATANOIDES var. 'COLUMNARBROAD/ PARKWAY ACER TRUNCATUM x A. PLATANOIDES 'NCRVEGIAN checked prof eng proj dir SV 10/04 S 10/04 Sdd bk no WORTHY AND ASSOCIATES 4x>xituA AICENIMODAID 88CDRATIONAL P0.4 1l1so MID WNW DM MST AV W$ cards NUM= 000 SRATlL4 WAVAI OT0.I 06707 SSI.00841484S 0 ?AZp -W 010/ NCRVEGIAN SUNSET MAPLE 2 -1/2" CAL. MIN.. B&8 SELECT AS SHOWN 96 STAtA9/i61C11 IIfffi79rED STEPHEN OECRGE RUNT MIMEO No. 2Z PLANTING 4t 0 SR 99 MP. 20.66 TO MP. 21.62 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD, KING COUNTY JULY. 2004 no date revisions STREET TREES — PLAN lie no: 24033P01 Bede: 1•e20' date: 10 -04 -041 CO N 1 • North Site Driveway and SR -99 LOCO mt N C)CON CA J j L. 64—t t-254 120 -- • .-73 30-1 1-42 � 1 1 r CI 0) Ill o N o CO o) International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. 32nd Avenue S S 154th Street S 154th Street S 160th Street S 160th Street South Site Driveway and S 160th St. 4 N S 162nd Street TransportationSolutions, Inc. Figure 3 2004 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Cendant Car Rentals S 154th Street North Site Driveway and SR -99 121 Col CI) GO e— M r- CD International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. SITE S 160th Street South Site Driveway and S 160th St. Transportation. Solutions, Inc. Figure 4 2010 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, Without Project •S 161st Street 34th Avenue S S 162nd Street Cendant Car Rentals j t-12 North Site Driveway and SR -99 CpU)M CO C:I en 10 0 •- Q1 N e- J I L L 82--t t— 289 145-- • ' _109 65 In MN.t. a- M N 1. O International Boulevard (SR -99) and S 160th St. I4 «J L t— 0 446 -- • — 416 South Site Driveway and S 160th St. d c a S 154th Street S 154th Street S 158th Street'. S 160th Street U) d c d v c N. . •S 262st Street S 160th Street 34th Avenue S 91�'% Street S 162nd Street day TSiff Transportation Solutions ;'Inc. Figure 6 2010 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes, With Proposed Project Cendant Car Rentals Level of Service Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR-99) PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 4-- fl t t \*. oxement EBL EBIT EBB 1/.\/BL INBEt NB.0 NBL • NBIT NB1 .131.1 SBL SBir • SBR Lane Configurations I I) .) $ r A +ft* ideal .F.161K(Iiiififil)=1900": 90011-,J.,:,:1900,. j:1900,;•1900;-: ,..-:190V,:1900,1.,:19001900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LanktitiLEktor7Z.::. :',-::‘!:',1:0-67,i' 1:00 ,,Ltif,77:77T":00..j:00:-D:1:VC:':=::::dii.007::: Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 DI r , ;1900 ;%• ''',19007-1900,71900.00777:77.1 -4.0 4.0 4.0 097 O95TTi" 1.00 1.00 0.85 Satd. Flow (prot) 1626 1661 1671 1759 1495 1736 4941 3367 3471 1553 EltiPdrMitt::;.:0.95T.Z'•-':-1:0077f:E7--::2A951::.00i•.1;;:l..00,'2..::.':,.7;':;:::.-•:..7--f,0".'9-57.a1.00r.i.•,:Zff.,L'.f.,1.:i:.,:;7:,77.5.J2•i9,52:T:T_1:00.:?T.:j70-f);.•LT--'1 Satd. Flow (perm) 1626 1661 1671 1759 1495 1736 4941 3367 3471 1553 yoliirtii(Vit)L--,:j.;-,:, 7::--"35:1'1..:!.5:-4: 64:,,,)120 ;',..--,:.',;.•.-30,77-•-.42;:-..--•iZ±-73.','•:254:,::•-•131:.',,,:-.:29;•i•!:-'•-'905 ,‘‘..----169.21,,,:;:92'"•-•°21..6,1".1s1§2iLl'::3,94:-.,;,--,.,e-,,d Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ,FILO7WIliph).SY:',,,(!iT_.75':-,V.::,!::141:7:-1'35'..?•,..46'.•-..79.:::c::'•..:-..2TC',,".714,--.7273•1=963'..,.; :-.73:764 ":-.-zafT6 7 =,4:;j.:--.2277a89.1L.:9_932:aiL•J RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 -0 248 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 42 Line7GJO:yekElliylifipt)-77,71L1_65"•..; V,:."2:L.0.1'.21._7:--;,40:-,,...;;;:, •-79..:;.:::;,..-„';'7282:;,,..,: -:,,,,0!:::7 45L-,1021'.',•-:-sj-,-:,-E.:=0:.'1-.,.77'...•02=3247Z7.8917.17:761L.L1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 11% 11% 11% 8% 8% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% it u-rh- TY0e--t-si....7.:•.I,'.';74:,4-.?Y'...7ft"::,.=..-:SPlit :::::•..1.:'-i";L.:::Z"::,;,-.':. r'.: ;-4.:'..i.Split"--•'4.-, -:.."'';:e- .1... Perth • ...;PrOf,;';':',Piot :'-',`:::: j 5..;;::.: „ .....; Pr gt•LL: .e.rbt`;',:.2,..--.:';..;:Per:Lii:"-...,...Y.''.', Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 5 2 Actuated dreen'TG (i) 14.5 14.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.4 23.0 52.1 52.1 Eff-e-etTie.Gr7ff(i)::,L-',-114.5::,:':;14:5-'.c.:g77-= :".:.--1;=.:4100,',,f..,16:67-7'100:::)::,:.,,c,Z"-t-,.:.....',.,7.4-7. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.36 0.23 0.52 0.52 Tirne(s) ::.f:7.-‘,.-,;;74:0:-:-,.';',....,:410:.';'!;-;.,.....:...-..:•::',.=:;1;-•5:,40;i:....r,;',4. 0). 7-7,-:1:77-:,-,-.40W, :;:,-.::::?..;,........-:.-:.-....-:--::40A-,.•&•46-77-.40 ',.,?:=....7:3:1 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . Lane GkiCap:(vPh) r.::-.:.:!'c:;:.4:- 236 ...1*--,:ij'241 fl.:;',:': :::"-,..‘.:;':jf:i167.-..-:-...-41,76"..--:350,,,..- ..:12EG-.1 803Z,:;::,:71'..,*::.'7:?/,-',17.i.:i:I4''::::::77,4s-`,Z A cia;',-<:,,:l 8097:-.:::,:-:::,::.-1 1 1 6 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.10 0.03 c0.04 v/c Ratio 5 Uniform Dera.W.dL.::::;:±7-.:,a138,,40.6- Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 ....08 <7,7.8 .:&-;•:-.7_,•:: 0:91`.8!..• --3'.o:6,:?.,:,':::::...:;..:. ,-.., ,;,:.-97:777.'..77.-1 Delay (s) 39.1 48.4 42.5 44.2 -41.9 45.7 26.7 33.2 16.4 12.1 Ifeveltt Service,-).-:"Iy;'.: '::::''',.:Z.:;0'.;',:.;-' D 7:.::, • -',7: :,D '1:i f • . ‘,.D ,:'::: -;";:i;;D ...-:".F- al, =:- 7:::::;: -D,:-.7.-.!.'-'1C 7 777-';s.::: ..' t. :: P ` ::;,-..7:B.Z-: ' .;"":::, B:::,-:., Approach Delay (s) 45.6 42.4 27.5 20.2 0.03 c0.21 c0.10 c0.26 6764 .7771 5 0.57 0.42 0.49 0.07 • • • • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2004 Existing Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR-99) PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 k t P LI` \* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBLYWBT VVBR NBU ° NBL NBT °NBR 'SBU SBL , SBT SBR APProachlOS Intersection Summary HCM'AVeiigeitaritral Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio LiiidthAS)7.-77'17 • Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0.57 " "7 '1 000 Rfatroittimet.(s) .-N,77.;;; , 7, ; t 60.2% ICU Level Of Service 2004 Existing Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hour 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR-99) 1/10/2005 se. •-• t P \ 4' 2010 Without Project Synchro 6 Report Transportation Solutions, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 1~ k f1 4\ t t \ l 4' Movement rM EBL, EBT `EBR : 'VNBL WBT C WBR NBU ,NBL NBR SBU' SBL SBT SBR J FC. Intersection$ummary HCM Average Control Delay :: :. ,31..5' HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 A_ ct atetl Cycle Lengths) ! _ , 100:0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1% A'nalysis:Penod =:(mm) A 1'5 c Critical Lane Group M>Levelof_Service„ :Sum "of lost time (s)' ICU Level of Service C 2010 Without Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak Hour 1:S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR-99) 1/10/2005 --• N te" 4— IL 41 4 \ t P t I \ * 4/ 2010 With Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 160th Street & International Boulevard (SR -99) PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 f ~ 4 it 4\ I /, \► 1 r Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL ., WBT .:WBR' NBU ' NBL .'.NBT NBR:; SBU SBL SBT SBR Approac .a, Intersection Summary HCM = Average:_ Control, ,Delay 34 4 ;,, ; -;HCM LeveIof Service HCM Volume to , Capacity ratio 0.72 K ctuated Cy le- Le ngth(s)= - 100 0 -> . =f Sum o flost.bine s )_ . *0 (.20 : Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis:?eriod (min):- _y;.. c Critical Lane Group 67.6% ICU Level of Service C • 2010 With Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: North Site Driveway & International Boulevard (SR -99) PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 Movement WBL WBR" NBT NBR .'SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Oft f +f Sign;Control Yield • " `Free �fr'Free`" 4..e. s...✓..w..w ...eW...wv.r..+.»+..a�..do`r.« .... �....�a:J[u✓�».sw.fi.'D....r. rf....r ... _ Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vCu, unblocked vol 2138 549 Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Right tum flare (veh) 0% 0% •R; giros- R.'w1'v�tr,• rTL. ^"'1TyA,'_` ^"T-- u.er'pr'r -}n3� _.1 1635 ,.. i :1 p0 queue free % 100 97 100 clVl'capacity (veh %ti) } } 742,480 R' M393" birection, Lane #. - VolumeTotal, "µ Volume Left Volume'Right,74 r,r'". -'� cSH Volurrie ti Capaaty °,0.03 0.38 2 :`; 0:38 'r,�= 0 20 ,,0; 30 '0 30 9'..,367:71„,:--..,., Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Control; Delay (s) „ 12:7,-....- :> 0:0, "10:0 ::, , 610.-,'. 0 0 ; 5. 0 0 :': r 0 0 ?:, Lane LOS B Approach r ' I Y:Cs-F:777127 __ O Q 7. ._ �I. s, .,.:6�....._.. Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection' Capacity Utiliiat on ` 39:1 %fir, ' ICU Level'of Seance Analysis Period (min) _ _y_ 15 ..:x.. a� "�`c. .;i:a. ..Y ,•,'h:g ;;'ins„ 2010 With Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: S 160th Street & South Site Driveway PM Peak Hour 1/10/2005 ovemeot Lane Configurations Grade yolunie Peak Hour Factor flow ra"(vph) Pedestrians EBL EBY WRiT It. tr. 77:737Tree',T.;.Free ::Lsto131-_,Li VVV 0% 0% 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 485 452 EC7:17.7.1?:=7/-7°-=;.7.77,..7.7.777172:f.11 WBR SBL SEM 7.7:777:717,— . i�Width Walking Speed (ft/s) ,77'77 t:-. 77777 F. . . * • Right turn flare (veh) ii.tyjc•e!r Media Median storage veh) Lipstiearfriigna I P, • 1. pX, platoon unblocked 45.27=7:77 758 226 7,771:77.7 ''.":.?:77-7.7. -7 7"- Li vC1, stage 1 conf vol yC2;*.ade2,conf; vol vCu, unblocked vol 452 758 226 te, 2 stage (s) " 7-S:677737 3 , • p0 queue free % 97 100 93 Mcapacity (veh/h»4 1105 ' 77;77777333f=',777,: • 77-7, jr V. V. 6 ' • • , •',1■•4 ane # EB EB 2WB VIM SB 1 '4v,..3(..)-1,171 51' • Volume Left 32 0 0 0 0 LY,91,141r) fi 0 52. cSH 1105 1700 1700 1700 777 ylume to Capacity 0019 018.. 009 007 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 5 ontrol Delay 16 0 0 0bl0 . Lane LOS A A Approach LOS nte_csetiorri Summary A Average Delay Iiiter'section*CaPeqitY:Utililatior Analysis Period (min) 0.8 ICU Leverof Sei■Wee.-777.7,7 15 .7**. : • • -**”7-7,7"-- , • • 2010 With Project Transportation Solutions, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 66 6ATE AAe WASINOTON 120'. STATE PATROL 04C) GU AIL ,/ • ‘,/ / /4/ 4Y14N W1i�l�ita _ - _.5TH 1L •v��I _I 6•10574395 •31• 10,-40715 6147 -' �'W�r�`1'07317 71479• ' : .683. 1 • 6.050.1 R • 47168• \ ' 1 �PHOEE 16• .PHONE \ - . J MEE7o' Ns\ i i Ib 1. 1 I I 'j`✓i,10v %40'BTORIbE 1'8470e15 5.44 RU ASPHALT PAVING • DEMOLISHED TTEATE R (SEE GAL) - RU CLFO TO PROTECT P. WALKWAY (TYP) - RU 4,0' LONG V4EB. STOP (TYP • B4PLOYEE 8 VISITOR PK6) RU A SGAPING - SES L. DWG ern. SHOWN SHADED DARK) RU 6'-0' WIDE CONCRETE COLORED PEDESTRIAN SIDBIALK (SHOMN HATCHED) O rex RAISED CONCRETE COLORED PEDESTRIAN SIDBVALK • DRIVE AISLE - SLOPE AG PANNE TO I•MT RU RAISED S1DBIALK (S HM1 HATGFD) MODIFY CURDS. LANDSCAPING ! DRNE AISLES AS RF3D FOR FIRE /RUCK ACCESS AS SHOWN - SEE SHEET PAU 4 CARL (5440P 4 DASHED) 78345 RU FIRE DEPT GATE TO RESTAURANT 517E PROVIDE AN INSTALL 4' DIA. CONDUIT FOR GBmANT'S SECURITY SYSTEM TO MAINTIGIANGE ElLD6. ELECTRICAL ROOM "(AMBIANCE F FA�CyL�JTTY� (DOSING BOWLING ALLEY) SM A2.1 (11 UNDER SEPARATE PEWIT) PREFAERIGATED CANOPY (SEE CANOPY D•465J GAR SPRY CAR ENTRY 86970915 170' (5) GILLIAM CREEK PHt SURVEY (E) DFWNASS CULVERT SU 7RA5N BICLO'.,LRE W/ 0141 WALLS 4 GPIAIN LINK SATES W FWD SLATS FIRE MUCK ACCESS ROE - 20'-0 1424, WIDE (TYP SNO161 DASHED) EL co NARR RRENSSTAURANT OIC) RU MAN-GATE PV PIN -PAD SECA. TTY 10676555 6•.94' • 10771645 40.1W SITE PLAN DOLLAR RENT-A -CAR 04C) SURVEY DATA SOURCES: PROPERTY LINES, TRIAD ASSOCIATES, 04/12/04 SITE SURVEY, CP SURVEYING, 06/09/04 TRA}SPORT VEHICLE TYPE SNAIL BE CONSIDERED INTERSTATE SEMITRAILER. SYMBOL 40661 RU TRASH MALLS C/INUWALLS! PC SLATS SEES 1 WD °AAl5 -SEE A21A IC TTPE LANDSC I SEE LARD. DWG• 41(1 GOHERIC S ! (N) 6UARVRAIL INTERIOR OF mPLANDSCAPIN6 (E) TYPE 111 LANDSCAPING - 5EE LAN. DF465 PROJECT DATA 20BIBG RC (REGIONAL COMMERCIAL) WILDING I M11, ,TING VSF ADMOBSTRADON OFFICE (1 FLOOR). MAINTENANCE OFFICE (1 FLOOR) CAR MAINTENANCE 00MDBOOIN 1 SECURITY (I FLOOR) OTA CAR WASH, FUEUNG 5 -1 (LEL4g3) (6.159 SF CANOPY NOT NCUIOED) TOTAL BUILDINGS 665E PARCEL 1 222304 - 9101 -02 e550..1 E660/L2 222304 - 9015 -07 PARCEL-9 SITE AREAS BUILDINGS (E) LANDSCAPING (N) LAN05GAPDIG (E) PAYING (51 PAVIN1 TOTAL Silt M(7 FANCY 5-1 TANOPIFS (E) CANOPIES (6•1 CANOP115 CANOPY TOTAL PARKING DATA 50,601 5F 124.534 5F 26.955 5F 418.365 SF (INCLUDES TRASH ENCLOSURES OF 258 & 186 5F) 38 334 5F 658.869 5< 12ASSOSAI126 5YN/ARF SWAM- Ton in 16,684 7 TYPE 10 TNPE V TYPE 11 30.329 5F 48 5F 3 746 5F 50,601 5F 222304 - 9001 -03 0138TER: 5W 1/4 CC SW 5/4 222304 - 9102 -01 S int 22 TOWNSHIP- 231V g6NGE. 440, W.M. 8.506 5F 2.560-SE 16.014 4 5< SQUARE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE CFFICE 9,715 5F (1 FLOOR) CAR MAINTENANCE 20.614 5F (1 FLOOR) ADM6a5TRAT10N 16.684 SF (1 FLOOR) 02 ARDB00) 48 5F (1 011 9.899 SF (1 FLOOR) (INCLUDING CANOPY) TOTAL PARKING STALLS BICYCLE PARKING DATA SQUARE EOGIGGE 16.684 3 BL UM *O ADMWSTRATNIN (1 FLOOR) MAINTENANCE 30.329 7 (1 FLOOR) OTA 9.899 S• (I FLOOR) (INCLUDING CANOPY) RECEIVED FEB 2 5 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT r (E) LANDSCAPE STRIP WU (66 TYPE II LANDSCAPE - SEE LAND. MISS O AAGC�EE5y65 TRUCK I�DEPASII) 401 8-0-T lfi -S 7 R-E-E 1 S�H�IU�`TTLE PARK 1 (NC) RO E'-6 WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP _0 15 30 120 1' -so -o-; SITE PARKING RFO6FI40415 1 STALL / 333 5F 1 STALL / 1000 5F 1 STALL / 333 SF 1 STALL / 333 SF. 1 STALL /1000 5F BICYCLE BEm1181b11I5 1 SPACE / 50 KG STALLS 1 SPACE / 50 P60 STALLS 1 SPACE / 50 PSG STALLS NOTES. STALLS STALLS BEQUEDI PEW= 30 31 21 23 51 53 1 1 _12 _Ll 113 121 SPACES 2 1. AIL WOK SHALL BE IN C0E048 41 AS 11E Ott OF 11N4L1 AND THE WA9MOT01 STATE STANDARD 6EaFICATE 5 ILO WITANCE OR Da:P1M 6 REQUESTED. z 07516•0 117407RMNC 06080 POFSNED BY OTHERS. 3. NO AO0N00 DEEDS OR 1111E REPORTS ARE BOO SWATTED. 4. 60 NOWK SHALL STMT OMR NECESSARY POBRI5 AE OBTAINED FROM ALL *V0.VED KENOS. 5. ALL Wu* 94A5 BE DOE N AOCOSONS TO 0051950 SOIL DIRT. SEE 0200613 PR0,ER *AK ER FOR REPORT. 6. 605841(1, BLOW 0040110 A59DOATE3 (BOA) AND THE are or 11N6EA 90.11. BE IOT660 N AWAKE 6 C05D63 THAT WSW ANY CHANGES FRES SOW PEAKS 7. ANY NECESSARY 1RA111C COMM 9MEL BE PER6OB4D N ACCORDANCE 9114 M NEWRD117RS Cr THE LATEST WNW. 6 TRAFFIC 60NTRa5' P)B1194D BY THE WASHPICTOI OEPMIIENT OF TRAN9a1TAMRl. 6 RE 804851 OF OBSTWC110 6 (POW POM WOES. WA66(0 WALLS. ARM 510)08,6[7. PIPELINES. ETC) WALL. BE AT TIE CONIRACTOW OOOESE 6. 06500 5TDR4 DRAINAGE 545104 66 9TE AREAS NOT WSW TO E 119D UNLESS 940.1 ODERN3E ON DE MAN. SD a♦t to 6400 CONSTRUCTER. 001K1R ICRDN 0E* SMALL 130004E A PROGRAM OF 6057 COMAS. NNARN' OJT POT UNITED TO. STOW Sal SURFACES AS WISED TO PRESTO PST BLOWING COWING TRUCK 669010ND MATERIALS 10 AO FROM DE SITE AND FREapT CLEAN-UP (STREET STEEPING) OF S0. CAWED BY COl1TR4CDOM 5000E TIRES FR04 DE SITE WO ROADWAYS COOLY PIS AL WOES 6E0R4E 415. SEE OW 11. ALL EICAVATg6 C-ce N 013T1N OR SEATER 941LL E SHORED NO BRACED AWOIROW TO STATE LAW 12. ALL MVO 0060/01005 WSW AF101 OEYOUDON DAMACO 5900 CONSTRUCT *4 SHALL E WPAOID AT 11E CONDUCTOR'S 000NSE TO DE 01115FAC1104 Of (MONO. WA MO DE OTT OF *WA. 13 CONTRACTOR SWAM BE 605Pa19 .1 KR ANY DAMAGE. TO ROADS OR (0.46 (1 PRIVATE PO60RTY, CAUSED BY 16•5 ACTISTIE9 NO ALSO WSW RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY OTHER MONK SCORED P6EMI1TN0 9401 SWAGE AL DEBRIS 410 4N0A1A0E MAWS. RD6N DE AREA OF OW. 58104300401 INCORPORATED N ME a. SW. E 90010 TO A MEDAL 06091E AT DE MOM Of DE CONTRACTOR 15. DE CONTRACTOR SCSI DERa11 CAE 6E01 NORRRO NEAR DOTING UILMS AND 9WLL E RCIDONSBLE FOR ALL DANSE BREAKAGE OR LEAKS CAUSED BY N5 BOWL CAL USA 46 N0.473 WOE WOW 16. E WORK IS NOT PERFOOED AT 41061 THEW SHALL E ILO HOES OIL 9700065 Cr MATERIAL 11/081 DE AREAS RITE 60110AA6 WIVE MAY OCCUR FROM B pm TO 6 AM ALL NOES STALL E SA0061m OR RATED FOR H-20 WADING 17. WIEA[ [76010 SWOTTED U EER00U0 *RUM ARE *COUNTERED MO 111E1 AMEN COSUCT *i) WON ASSOCIATED r18 M9 CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR 9111 *WOK 11101 A5 RWEDED AIO 01909E OF ME MATERIAL ACC0060 TO DE LATEST O91A EC CATION AMD M 100 000117 RED1R00NTS NOW SNOW PALO 404 WEN WSW ABARDaNED UNDERGROUND D UWILMS ARE E)CONERED. M. CONTRACTOR 9HA1 E ESPONSBLE FOR WANG A MIST COPY Cr CONSTRUCTION . P1646 AT PROJECT 910 09040 026D6ICW14. • 19. CONTRACTOR 9ULL PROW OE SR OF GETAAE) 'AS -NAr P4019 940190 AL. EVU110MS OMAIIGES 106106•4 AM OELETIO85 FOR AL ROWK. 20 0NE1N900 AS EXACT 110 HEED ID E COORDINATED WIN Fm ORIOTIONS 11. 0803 90.L BE SWEAT 1K GRADED 601604 4l WITS 22. ALL SAW 0115 SMALL E 00( ON A SMART 11E ANO SNAIL BE ACCEPT4RE TO WA SAW 0173 TO E I. DC* MAP. 23. AU. SREET 4ROK10413 9)811 E CONSTRUCTED N S1WCT ACCORD/1W r114 OTY 6 93100* 51410409. 9SOFCATIO N& RAMS AIO AAIDOW1T4 • 24. CO ORACTER SMALL WOES EXCAVATE ROSS AO (EPOS OF ALL 00511/0 COWES 6 ASPHALT CdOE1E PAWNS CONCRETE 090. OKRA MO 068410 AND ORET08113 MATERIALS WOWS 10 0310191CT THE CONTRACT NON. AL DEWS MATERIAL OENp410 BY 001.41404. 5CAVA1101 AND MALNG WALL E 019090 6 81 1NE CONIMCTOR. E400I0I MORE NOT SHORN N 0110[13. 21 M CONTRACTOR SHALL WM' AIL 9IUTY LOCATIONS IT 9401 E TIE .' . OWIRACIW'S $QE 605ONSBLJ15 TD PROTECT ALL 06ST8NC 01811403 SO NAT W DAMAGE RESEW TO 1HOM OURS M PERFORMANCE OF DN5 CONTRACT. 195E OOITRAC1OR WAS E WOWED TO WORT NAT[ AM COOPERATE 1404 01110t 01RAC1OR3 AND u1UT 6004NIE5 *STALLING NOR STRUCTURES. CHUTES A140 soma TO THE OKAALL DENL6N341. COMTRAC10l 10 CONTACT USA REGARDING ALL U1UDE5 At WHEW PAVEMENT 6 MKS OR SST * DE NSTALAION OF DE WORK 0310W0 BY THESE 00LT1100R THE PAVEMENT SN1). BE 901.4 D. AFTER PROM BACWILANG rTN PAWS* 1AIEWALS WW1 T0. OR BETTER SAN. DE MATERIALS GEED N M 160OIAL FONTS. M SEWED PAYMENT SHALL BE 9.111ECT TO DE A MNOVAL 6 BOA 27. M CONi6AC1E AGREES MAT E 9111. ASSOC SOLE AND COMPLETE ESP698UTY FOR JOB SITE 02015049 OWNS M COSS Or CSIST CRO1 OF 16•5 PRO3C1. MUSK WRY CF ALL PERSONS AW PROWS. A10 THAT THIS 6OAEL0IT SMALL APPLY WOIMUQJ3Y AND NOT BE 111010 10 IOWA KRICK HOURS M 001940116 SHAT. DODO. L0006Y AND NOW CDOANT 110 WA NAR4LE53 PROM ANY ANO M1 UAWTY. REAL 6 1EE®. N C WEC110N *M M PEEONN0 Of WORN ON 1145 550101, EXCEPTING FOR W LIN ARMING PROM M SOLE Ea0ENCE OF FENDANT OR WA 26 EDSING 01411169 AE WWI N numm ARPRODMATE LOCATIONS 4001? N 600. 20. ALL CROSS SLOPES AT WAARAYS 916•1. BE 1/471' -0- IAA 30 9TE 6 PROPERTY CANES 010190t5 ARE PER SAW. SEE 010 110142611 WOW PUNS FOR ALL 91E 601079010 AND WNW. PONT5 01. WE 4015 PLANS F6 ECLWO *IS QUALITY PROCESSES WRAC CONSTAXTION. SLUNK DEMATTEI ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS AIA 1555 BAYSMORE HVVY *300 CA - 94010 TEL (650) 692 -9911 IN MI FAX (650) 692-0161 MI NO. RE.I ON DATE IT IS THE RESPONSSUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL FIELD THEM Cw0TH THE SCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS BEFORE ERRORS, ANY OTERWF9SID4CIE COMMENDING DISCOVERED SHALL BE REPORTED 10 IMMEDIATELY THE ARCHITECT REVISED DRB APPLICATION for CENDANT CAR RENTAL GROUP, INC. 15820 TUKWLA F TERNATIONAL BOULEVARD TUCWLA, WASHINGTON 98188 SITE PLAN r- 50. -0. DATE LOB NO. 2/15/05 20457.08 A1.1 SHEET 2 OF 14 INITYDED TO 6E AN 3LE AREAS OF CONCERN AS A EE6INNIN6 POINT IN AFCEAS IN TIE L1T13;ZA AND INSTRLIC1106 UNIGLE TO E TELEFHOtf, ELECT, MARTS FOR COMPLETE 6: ARH SYSTEM A5 REC RED .00ATION 6 UTILITIES AND COMPLY b1IREMNTS, ENT - FAse,t- TS) BIDDER p€ 16N SYSTEM. Je A COMPLETE SYSTEM TO ZfTFNT 14410 COMPLE5 KITH L ;IONS PROPOSED) 4oEgsaaddid: WONJ 71% WdET :PK PIKE ET PALS VICINITY MAP U 0 C 0 `Q cc J a� o W Q oO Z Z� OCrn t=. a CC Z o < cco a0E- -0 Q Z co I cn QY as D 1J Z0 mVrE- w W w J F.— DATE 9/27/04 JOB NO. 20457.01 A0.1 SHEET 1 OF 12 • Scate Taco inierna Airp Southwest Tributary Tukwila City Limits ...... •••• • 411: . • 706.1) .... .mrft.p.rtm. / • 1 • I "VA City of SeaTac V. . 160. th.S. tre?t i ■ i .I1 es. . , ■ ' • i i '...I r ''- : ”' I I I '•'.jr9 i I 1 -, CY I " • ' • 1 ' .' i A U. ir :pro ‘ •I' ▪ •••111 me. sewn m. oath crce : NO CRYSTAL SPRINGS SUBBASIN • 11.1■1 I 11=11•111 ........... nds ro SOUTHCENTER SUBBASIN . i'. V. Tukwila E! Pond / I : X . . •••• . .0'. ■ i . ...- FiUk GillianhCreeic,basie,te-haracterist4;q‘ / Ei HERRERA GYVIROVAIGVTAL CONSULTANTS t-- aref �. M l4 44 ..A M�u ALLt� L WMM '+� . MIMIIM :t1- 1* W . d Wz.v... MM M M'M M,M M U.. AA M IiaId1M 1 ,W .... IA M N MM.,M W *41*41Y •I W MMMMM 41 M r... IA'.' ` W .AMA I uWW IAN MM. -/A.- w .. MMMN :.'P' ..1.1.11. `. M V p. • . M L RM A. . , a' ..... M I+ ..1 NM - • IMAM •IWIi.W MMMN Id \`� M M IM.•.�W ..MMM 41 Id a r. .. «. MMM IA k /L d.ww MM 4w �� - d W 4•rIN.114P11A1 4. w Y. M M M• M M A we- H N M Y M V.M 0ld M., •• .rw••we M,M M M'tl.M V'. 411A.L1•U b.. , 1A M I4 M•' IA1.M MMM MMY. .d 1704A Lt M w ., ..MMMN M!Id M MM... .YMMMy.•.. d2. •L /L M' •'Ij ..r... V4Ntl .. WW .MMMN .r rte. 15,44 M NY r. as sou +.y 14 IdMMM r.r.«.. M 13111 N we tufts.. MMM 4 ea .. .MM MN~...bob* .i. � •'uu co.. Y..a. . a.NMMI uM r. 41 M 1 u . • . 4. ��(��..33aa a YMM M m 611 ....1................a M. u. MMMIAMM. •U..M AIM.. w • .. M N .... .I. M M M. M QMU. 4« MId 1...w. .JL..+r y 11d Ml1M . MId... MRM1.. . . MI IA.F ,• 1q1 M N Mw •4w MMM WZ.. Mr. 4t M ML1 *.Ww. 44.14 ...Li WWW 414 a N Id I *%J.' 2 «. Id IA II M .WW • a. 4 N 1,1 4.11/ WWW w M MMN WWW .4'14 M NN4. .. r1 M.i MY IA.uu .I. M NM w4.0 u. we MMMMww..a.1 14 MMM •• m .4 a0ii. . 4i i M 1dWi. 44'N IA .dWWW' art. M' ...,vet. 9.9 M WMM+ 4..d M p .MMWW r1 4M M .AIlMw .. N MM Nee. , , Illumin040®-V01uoo(Fc)' Avwrapo *8.10 Maximum 09011, ':Minimum .0.1 ' Avg /Min-R0t1AB8l.80 Max /Min•Rat10g801.0c :. ..MM41M 444MAA•Mw • w M Mid LIY! 4 4 M M1 1A tAN. .... N.M RI•A a...+.4t..! L&LId 4t •. Luminair'e' 'Schedule. Project: hll ..Projects Symbol.' ' :Qty ... . Label ' Arrangement Lumens -9 2 � .. A .: SINGLE . -.. -El 18 .A2 BACK -BACK. 107.800• B2 BACK= BACK:. 107800 LLF :' . - Description 0.648 KSF': 10•00SMH. R3. EXISTING. LOCA' 0:. 648 KSF. 100.0SMH_ .R3: EXISTING LO.CA 0..64.8 ::KSF..1000.SMH. R3. NEW. LOCATION Numeric : Summary _ Basic' ' Project: A11' .. Projects Label Ca1.cType Unit:sAvg Max Min Avg /Min Max /Min .Ground Top IlluminanceFc ' ; -5.07. 30.1 . 0..1 :50.70 '..301.00