Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E05-010 - SABEY CORPORATION - SWIFT TRUCKING SITE
E05 -010 SWIFT LLC 3600 S 124TH ST City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION To: Douglas Gardner, Applicant The Sabey Corporation, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director October 6,2005 This letter serves a notice of decision that the application to designate the building demolition and soil remediation project for the former Swift Trucking site as a planned action is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: E05 -010 Planned Action APPLICANT: Douglas Gardner, for the Sabey Corporation REQUEST: Determine that the proposed project falls within the range of impacts analyzed by the Tukwila Manufacturing Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. LOCATION: 3600 S. 124th Street, Tukwila, WA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolish two buildings and excavate between 2100 and 5300 cubic yards of contaminated soils from a site previously used as a truck terminal to prepare the site for future development. No new construction is proposed at this time. DETERMINATION: Project is designated as a planned action. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MIC /H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster, DCD Director City of Tukwila SEPA Responsible Official CL q: \E05 -010 \Notice of Decision.doc Page I of I 10/05/2005 3:58 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 :YII•YZ= MMINliEU TOPO! map printed on 03/21/05 from "BaseMap Swift.tpo” and "Untltled.tpg" 122° 18.000' W 122°16.00V W 122°14.000' W 122 °22.000' W 122 °20.000' W WG584122 °10.000' W Sri c: go: datia 3i4 n �^ +tP f i�2 ®QqA� iiu�` \1�iE�1 j ?fir o �`iF�f� ' (1 et'� „`�d" 11) �°.Yti9 isn� a (� t ^bit i i✓, I rte tivi .� e7 tt �- ®"- aye \(( 1 —y 9 a �� �:llli 7 �i1 01. 16 reali[ 7�q�treiv i' \�' m 1i CCe ��0a0� I °\ t 1 711F9� 7 a jf` ! `u Nf ltE 111114 12i'Lio�. �j ��! .q �31 c." �`�7 aim Z 1 �e[311011 1 l�lrs�FesP�- ��a)���; raiNlll;r.__ �aa!J n.ectl9::t G l�l !au._.titu�,nm,_ „f�►1.��.`5�4�\ IL � flly !C!lgill'L 122 °22.000' W TN F /l04 V18' Ref: VicMap Swift :cdr 122 °20.000' W 122°18.000' W 122 °16.000' W 122 °14.000' W 011 03 1.0 13 20 25 30 3.5 auks 0 1 7 3 4 5bn . Printed from TOPO!O22000 Neti°ro1Oeoawhic Holdings (t.w.totw.c°n) N WGS84122 °10.000' W 3gI=1G7iY. 7iinDZF]U Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Vicinity Map SAB -024 FIGURE 1 Mar. 2005 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuelcvand. Inc. P -7 ® P -8 GW -3 usT #1 P -9 E Exist Waste Oil AST O Quest Soil Spl. (1996) & GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well • MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well P Probe Location PW Probe Location with Ground - Water Sample Attempt 30 0 UST #2 T1SW s ED P -17 JT1EW -Area of Tank Excavation UST #3. Prev. 4,000 /5000 gal Gasoline/Diesel UST I rPrev. 10,000 g Diesel UST T23SW Lube Room P -15 P -14 o Sump and C.O San. Sewer 0 Grouted and nerd Waste Olt 3 and One o Waste OO T GW-4 p Sump (lo Sen. - wer) To L] Sump (to San. ewer) Prevlous ,000/3,000 gallon Waste Oa UST PA0 = a._. p.12 UST #4 �2 P-13 30 T4SW Area of Tank Excavation P -11 (P MW-6 Exist Scale House Exist Scale Pit P -19 Exist Dispense 60 Scale in Feet (approximate) Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: SAB -024 probe well site map det.cdr Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Site Plan Detail Maintenance Building Area SAB -024 FIGURE 2 Mar. 2005 Dutton, (.)I)nstcd Euglcvancl. 1ne. ) Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: C Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: ---oc ` OD Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance Mailer's Signature: /' D, 64' Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Person requesting mailing: (1iAo(Ltd27/47 Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ — FAX To Seattle Times C1 assi fieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 i l Other tsion yy y� / � 6 U Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this to. day of year 20 DS in the P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: C Project Number: ---oc ` OD Mailer's Signature: /' D, 64' s Person requesting mailing: (1iAo(Ltd27/47 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM - ............._ -.._ • FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE • ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.O. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & Hr DEPT OF ECOLOG" ill%DEPIOF ECOLC )OFFICEOFA: .. • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATION': • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION (.. .C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC. /,)i.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( LTUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY () QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE ( ) POLICE () FINANCE ( ) PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK OTHER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM () SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIV E\FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC o/ID/05" () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE "KC. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES 04,OSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT () WATER DISTRICT #20 () WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWVW •LIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR ADMITS SEPA MAILINGS '*.Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant: *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\A DM MI STRATI V E\FORMS \CHKLIST. DOC • City of Tgtdl�3 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM September 30, 2005 To: Steve Lancaster, Director �� Fm: Carol Lumb, Associate Planef Re: Project File No. E05 -010 Swift Trucking Site Planned Action Project Description: Demolish two existing structures, a truck terminal building including freight dock and a shop /maintenance building and implement a remediation program to remove soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. The site is being cleaned up to permit future development - no development is proposed at this time. Proponent: The Sabey Corporation Location: 3600 South 124th Street Date Checklist prepared: July 19, 2005 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Washington State Department of Ecology 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • SEPA Review — E05 -010 Swift Trucking Site September 30, 2005 Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) Background: The site is within the project area for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The Integrated Plan and Final EIS were completed in March, 1998. Both the Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS and the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement analyze the environmental impacts of a range of development and redevelopment alternatives on properties in the MIC corridor. In 1995 a Planned Action SEPA was issued for this site for the removal of three underground diesel storage tanks and one underground waste oil storage tank. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth The site is generally flat and currently 100% impervious surface except for small landscape features on the east side of the site. The site will continue to be impervious surface when the project is complete. The applicant will be removing between 2100 and 5300 cubic yards of contaminated soils from the site. A Draft Remediation Plan was prepared June 24, 2005 for this site. A final Remediation Report will be prepared once additional site characterization data are collected and a remedial contractor is selected, so that the means and methods to be used by the contractor can be incorporated into the final plan. The applicant anticipates that the plan will be finalized during the early summer of 2006. It is estimated the remediation work will take approximately 4 -6 weeks to complete and that the-work will be carried out during the late summer of 2006. At the time the final remediation report is submitted to Ecology, the applicant will request a No Further Action designation for the site. Air During demolition, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will be released. Dust and vehicular emission from construction is expected. Water In 1995 when the underground storage tanks were removed, the groundwater levels ranged from one and three feet below the ground surface in the monitoring wells on the site. In the preparation of the draft Remediation Plan for this project, the consultants observed water levels between 1.4 feet and 4.1 feet. The applicant has stated that while past groundwater CL Page 2 of 5 09/29/2005 5:07 PM q: \E05- 010 \SEPA Staff Rpt.doc • • SEPA Review — E05 -010 Swift Trucking Site September 30, 2005 sample analyses (1996 and 2003) detected the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons above Ecology cleanup levels in monitoring well samples within the immediate release area, testing completed in 2005 indicates that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in samples collected down gradient of the former tank locations are below cleanup levels. Dissolved arsenic concentrations have been detected in the groundwater. The applicant states that removal of the source of petroleum hydrocarbons should improve the subsurface conditions so that arsenic is less soluble. As part of the remedy, the addition of Oxygen Release Compound to backfill is being evaluated. As stated by the applicant, the use of this Compound would promote aerobic conditions that will in turn promote the degradation of any residual hydrocarbons and decrease the solubility of arsenic in the ground water. This is because petroleum hydrocarbon degradation changes the geochemical conditions to anaerobic, which increases the solubility of arsenic. Contaminated ground water will be removed from the excavations to allow sampling and facilitate the placement of backfill. Groundwater removed from the excavations will be disposed off -site at a permitted facility. The impervious areas sheet drain generally from the south to the north and the surface water is captured in a series of catch basins along the northern property boundaries. The catch basins are interconnected and connect to a control structure at the northwest corner of the property. This control structure connects to the storm drainage system on the Intergate East property and flows westward and outfalls into the Riverton Creek. These catch basins will be protected during the course of remediation to protect the Riverton creek from contaminants. Plants As noted above, the site is almost 100% impervious surface with some landscaping features on the far eastern portion of the site. No vegetation will be removed or altered as a result of this project. Animals The Planned Action Checklist makes no notation of any wildlife on the site. Energy/Natural Resources Other than machinery needed to demolish the building, no energy will be used. Environmental Health Temporary noise impacts due to construction are anticipated. The soil remediation will address environmental health issues related to the contaminated soils and ground water. Any future development on the site will be required to provide a copy of the final remediation report and Department Ecology determination of No Further CL Page 3 of 5 09/29/2005 5:07 PM q: \E05- 010 \SEPA Staff Rpt.doc • • SEPA Review — E05 -010 Swift Trucking Site September 30, 2005 Action. The remediation contractor will prepare a health and safety plan prior to work beginning on the site. Land/Shoreline Uses The existing structures are being removed and the contaminated soils are being removed to prepare the site for future development. No development is proposed at this time. Housing Not applicable. Aesthetics Not applicable . Light/Glare Not applicable. Recreation Not applicable. Historic /Cultural Preservation Not applicable. Transportation Under a separate action, the applicant has requested that S. 124th Street, the public road that provides access to this site be vacated. The applicant owns the property on both sides of this street. The City Council has approved the request for street vacation, subject to resolving how the pubic utilities in the street will be accessed (either moving the utilities or providing easements). The street will become a private street and the applicant will be responsible for street lighting and maintenance. Public Services Not applicable. CL Page 4 of 5 09/29/2005 5:07 PM q: \E05 -0I0 \SEPA Staff Rpt.doc • • SEPA Review — E05 -010 Swift Trucking Site September 30, 2005 Utilities Utilities currently available at the site include electric, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, storm water and sanitary sewer. The building demolition is not expected to need any additional utilities. Recommendation Determination of Nonsignificance CL Page 5 of 5 09/29/2005 5:07 PM q: \E05 -OI0 \SEPA Staff Rpt.doc City of Tukwila 1 • Page 4 of 8 g City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 19, 2005 b. Appointment — Human Services Advisory Board — Position #3 — Term expires 04 -20 -06 Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Program Manager, noted Mr. Sisay Desalegn would serve as a "resident member" of the Board. Originally from Ethiopia, Mr. Desalegn is an eight -year resident of Tukwila and promises to be a "great resource and advocate." HERNANDEZ MOVED; HAGGERTON SECONDED; TO APPOINT SISAY DESALEGN TO THE HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD, POSITION #3, WITH A TERM TO EXPIRE APRIL 20, 2006. The motion carried 7 -0. CITIZEN COMMENT: James Marsh, 15849 47th Avenue South, Tukwila, spoke of deteriorating road conditions in his residential area, which is also known as "the loop." Citing "bad patch jobs" and "storm drains that do not meet Tukwila's own codes," Mr. Marsh seeks improvements. Additionally, Mr. Marsh spoke in favor of an increased police presence in the area as automobile drivers continually speed (above limits) in the residential area. Councilmembers were invited to "walk the loop" to see what occurs in the area and to realize assistance is necessary. XXX, 14207 — 42nd Avenue South, Tukwila, asked Council if they are aware of the CERT program and if they are considering its inception. Ms. Carter responded the Citizen's Emergency Response Team effort is something the City will consider — beginning with the Finance and Safety Committee. The City of Tukwila's approach to this program will be to strategize and develop it so that all are prepared "city- wide" (versus select neighborhoods only) in the event of natural disaster. This program is design to allow all community members (not just police, fire and other emergency management personnel) to assist in the wake of natural disasters. Ms. Carter also spoke of the need to be prepared to care for one's family (water, medications, food, etc.) for a period of 10 days, not just 3 days as previously suggested. Additional information will follow. Anna Bernhardt — 14241 — 59th Avenue South, Tukwila, asked Council to consider raising the temperature of Council Chambers during their meetings. Moreover, she asked Council to use their microphones during each meeting as hearing their comments is important. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Approval of minutes — September 6, 2005 Regular meeting b. Approval of Vouchers - #318331 - 318646, in the amount of $1,425,045.40 DUFFIE MOVED; HERNANDEZ SECONDED; TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. The motion carried 7 -0. BID AWARD: Award a construction contract to Dennis R. Craig, Inc., in the amount of $377,481.65, for the 2005 Small Drainage Program FENTON MOVED; LINDER SECONDED; TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO DENNIS R. CRAIG, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $377,481.65, FOR THE 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM. The motion carried 7 -0. PUBLIC HEARING: Vacation of South 124th Street a. Request for vacation of South 124th Street From East Marginal Way South to Tukwila International Boulevard b. An ordinance vacating a portion of South 124th Street City of Tukwila • Page 5 of 8 g City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 19, 2005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED WTIHIN THE CITY, DEDICATED FOR STREET PURPOSES, GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF SOUTH 124TH STREET, RUNNING WESTERLY FROM EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH TO PREVIOUSLY VACATED 351." AVENUE SOUTH; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL STREET MAP OF THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, reported receipt of a complete (July 20, 2005) petition by the Sabey Corporation to vacate a portion of South 124th Street from East Marginal Way South to 35th Avenue South. Mike Hansen, 12201 Tukwila International Boulevard, on behalf of the Sabev Corporation, distributed a discussion points sheet which encapsulated information presented via aerial photograph of the location in question. After recently purchasing the former Swift Trucking site (a 4 -acre parcel), Sabey Corporation now owns all properties on both sides of South 124th Street. At this point, the company seeks concurrence to vacate that portion of 124th Street to be made into an entrance for the Sabey Corporation campus. Additionally, he reported Sabey staff has met with Fire Department personnel regarding ingress and egress. Approval will be sought (when appropriate) to ensure design of the entrance meets with applicable codes. In response to Council inquiry, Mr. Hansen noted South 124th is used to access the Group Health building. Ingress /egress to the building shall continue without interruption. 8:24 p.m. Mayor Mullet opened the public hearing. Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, reported that while public utilities exist in the right of way in question, options exist. The Sabey Corporation may move the utilities out of the roadway to the satisfaction of the related company or easements may be granted. Mr. Hansen indicated easements would be granted. With no concerns or objections, City staff has heard from Puget Sound Energy, ValVue, Qwest, Comcast and Water District 125. They have not received a response from Seattle City Light. With no problems currently existing or envisioned, City staff is in favor of the petition and related ordinance. Should the vacation be granted, the Sabey Corporation would be obligated to post "Private Street" signs and will be responsible for street lighting on South 124th and 35th Avenue South. Further, they will be liable for related maintenance of the road. For the benefit of the audience, Mr. Morrow explained the street vacation process as outlined in the Tukwila Municipal Code and the Revised Code of Washington. Moreover, he noted a real property appraisal has established value of the property at $430,000.00. Calling for citizen comment twice, Mayor Mullet received none. 8:30 p.m. Mayor Mullet closed the public hearing. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE READ BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 7 -0. Peter Beckwith, Assistant City Attorney, read the title of the proposed ordinance. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS READ AND PRESENTED AND TO INSTRUCT THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ENSURE RELATED CONDITIONS ARE MET BEFORE THE ORDINANCE IS RECORDED WITH KING COUNTY RECORDS. SAID CONDITIONS (NOT ALREADY INCLUDED IN THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED), INCLUDE APPLICANT PROVIDING "PRIVATE STREET" SIGNS FOR SOUTH 124TH STREET AND PETITIONER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR EXISTING STREET LIGHTS ON SOUTH 124TH STREET AND 35TH AVENUE SOUTH. City of Tukwila 1 Page e 6 of 8 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes September 19, 2005 The motion carried 7 -0. APPROVED ORDINANCE #2101 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: a. Proposed ordinance amending a franchise agreement with Sprint Communications Company, LP (formerly U.S. Sprint) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WTH SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP, FORMERLY KNOWN AS US SPRINT, TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, REPLACE, AND REMOVE CERTAIN COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT UNDER, ALONG, ACROSS AND THROUGH CERTAIN CITY STREETS FOR THE PURPOSE OF OPERATING AS A CARRIER OF LONG DISTANCE TELECOMMUNICATIONS TRAFFIC; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO HAVE THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE READ BY TITLE ONLY. The motion carried 7 -0. Peter Beckwith, Assistant City Attorney, read the title of the proposed ordinance. FENTON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS READ AND PRESENTED. The motion carried 7 -0. APPROVED ORDINANCE #2102 b. Authorize Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to AG 05 -040, with KPG, Inc., in the amount of $48,574.12, for construction management services on the 2005 Small Drainage Program FENTON MOVED; LINDER SECONDED; TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO AG 05 -040, WITH KPG, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $48,574.12, FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES ON THE 2005 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM. The motion carried 7 -0. NEW BUSINESS: Park property purchase Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation, reminded Council the City owns the Duwamish Riverbend Hill property (8.7 acres), currently under Phase I development. In connection with that, Mr. Fletcher reported a potential opportunity to purchase 10,000 square feet of property adjoining the eastern park border on South 115th Street, across from the Duwamish River. For purposes of expanding the Duwamish Riverbend Park site (and keeping the area green along the river), Mr. Fletcher spoke in favor of making an offer to purchase the property. An appraisal has been conducted to determine fair market value. In its current ( "as is ") condition, fair market value of the property is $150,000.00. Purchase price monies are available through IAC parks grant, awarded in 2004. No monies will be taken from the City's general funds and funds from the IAC grant are only allowed to be spent on land acquisition. ROBERTSON MOVED; DUFFIE SECONDED; TO MOVE FORWARD WITH NEGOTIATIONS ON 10,000 SQUARE FEET OF PROPERTY ADJOINING THE EASTERN PARK BORDER ON SOUTH 115TH STREET, ACROSS FROM THE DUWAMISH RIVER, WITH AN APPROVED PURCHASE PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THE FAIR MARKET VALUE. The motion carried 7 -0. SABEY • CONSTRUCTION September 9, 2005 Carol Lumb Senior Planner CITY OF TUKWILA DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 • R tent SEP 0 D 0 2405 Cp 041 M4T RE: E05 -010 Soil Remediation Project at 3600 S. 124th Street Dear Carol; Please find below our response to your questions dated 8/24/05 regarding the City of Tukwila's review of Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand's draft Remediation Plan. 1. Will additional characterization of the contaminated areas be done prior to remediation as recommended in the report? It is unclear from the report prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. if you intend to carry out the additional characterization prior to remediation or if the areas to be excavated will be determined in the field during remediation. Yes, the additional characterization will be accomplished prior to starting the site remediation as recommended in the draft Remedial Plan prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc., June 23, 2005. However, as a practical matter, the extent of necessary remedial excavation will also be based on observation and testing while the remedial work is underway. 2. Were any solvent analyses performed as part of the analytical work carried out on samples from the vicinity of the waste oil tank? Yes. When the waste oil tank (UST No. 4) was removed in 1995, a sample of stockpiled soil from the excavation was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8240 that included common solvents such as tetrachloroethylene (perc) and trichloroethylene (TCE). No VOCs were detected in the excavated soil from UST No. 4. The results of these analyses are presented in a report by Quest titled "Results of Underground Storage Tank Removal Program at Inco Express, Inc., Located at 3600 S. 124`h St., Tukwila, Washington ", January 26, 1996. More recently (February 2005) a ground water sample was obtained from well MW -6 located immediately down gradient of the former waste oil tank location. The sample was analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. No solvents were detected with the exception of acetone that was detected at a concentration (19 ug/I) below Ecology's Method B cleanup level of 800 ug/l. The source of the acetone is not known but may be a laboratory introduced contaminant. The results of these analyses are presented in the Phase 1 and 2 Environmental Assessment Report by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc., April 1, 2005 (herein termed the "ESA report"). ARCHITECTURE CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT Sabey Construction Inc. /206/281-4200 main line 12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor 206/ 281 -0920 fax line Seattle, Washington 98168 -5121 www.sabey.com • • Page 2 City of Tukwila September 9, 2005 3. Is the groundwater contaminated? It seems likely there is some ground water contamination since the water table is so shallow. Is any remediation proposed for groundwater short of source control (i.e. removal of contaminated soil)? Where will contaminated groundwater be disposed? Past ground water sample analyses (1996 to 2003) detected the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons above Ecology cleanup levels in monitoring well samples within the immediate release areas. However, testing completed in 2005 indicates that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in samples collected down gradient of the former tank locations are below cleanup levels (and in fact petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were below the limits of detection in the down gradient samples). In 2005 dissolved arsenic concentrations were detected in down gradient monitoring well samples at concentrations between 5 ug /I and 16 ug/1. The Method A Ecology cleanup level for arsenic in ground water is 5 ug/1. As noted in the ESA report (p. 13), arsenic is often associated with the degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Petroleum hydrocarbon degradation changes the geochemical conditions (to anaerobic and reducing conditions) such that the solubility of arsenic in water increases. Where degradation occurs, naturally occurring arsenic is leached from soil into ground water. This appears to be the case at the former Swift Transportation site. Removal of the source of petroleum hydrocarbons (source control) should improve the subsurface conditions so that arsenic is less soluble. As part of the remedy, the addition of Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) to backfill is being evaluated. ORC would be added to backfill placed below the water table to promote aerobic conditions that will promote the degradation of any residual hydrocarbons and decrease the solubility of arsenic in ground water. During the remedy, contaminated ground water will be removed from the excavations to allow sampling and facilitate the placement of backfill. Ground water removed from the excavations will be disposed off -site at a permitted facility. The specific facility has not yet been identified. 4. What is the proposed schedule for site remediation? It is anticipated the proposed remediation will take about 4 to 6 weeks to complete and that the work would be accomplished during the late summer of 2006. 5. Will you seek a No Further Action Determination from Ecology? If so, when? Yes. A request for a No Further Action (NFA) designation for the site will be made at the time the remediation report is submitted to Ecology. Page 3 City of Tukwila September 9, 2005 6. When will the draft plan be finalized? The draft plan will be finalized once additional site characterization data are collected and a remedial contractor is selected (so that the means and methods to be used by the contractor can be incorporated into the final plan). It is anticipated the plan will be finalized during the early summer of 2006. 7. Will the existing 10,000-gallon diesel AST identified on Figure 2 be retained on -site? If so, does the tank have secondary containment and is there an adequate spill prevention control and countermeasure plan for the tank and dispenser? If not, will this area be checked for soil contamination as well? If the tank is retained on the site, any future site user must follow Ecology regulations for fuel dispensing. This tank was removed by the previous owner. The tank was positioned over a concrete slab. The area of gas / diesel section C on Figure 3 defines the area of remediation. The current users of the site will be follow Ecology regulations in the event they engage in dispersing fuel onsite. 8. The plan suggests that the cleanup may be done under the Department of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program. Have you decided whether to participate in this program or not? Sabey will participate in the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) as part of requesting a No Further Action designation for the site. 9. Please identify where the contaminated soils will be disposed. Contaminated soils will be disposed off -site at a permitted facility. The specific facility has not yet been identified but will be determined once the remedial contractor is selected. 10. What is the result of your evaluation of the use of oxygen release compound to address any residual petroleum hydrocarbons left in soil? Evaluation of the use of oxygen release compound (ORC) is still being completed. It is likely that ORC will be added to backfill to further promote the degradation of any petroleum hydrocarbon residues left in soil. Page 4 City of Tukwila September 9, 2005 • • • 11. Please provide a brief narrative on the storm drainage system on -site. How does the site drain? Is there storm drainage on the site? The site impervious areas sheet drain generally from the south to the north and the surface water is captured in a series of catch basins along the northern boundaries. These catch basins are interconnected and connect to a control structure at the northwest corner of the property. This control structure connects to the storm drainage system on the Intergate East property and flows westward and outfalls into the Riverton Creek. These catch basins will be protected during the course of remediation to protect the Riverton Creek from any undesirable disturbance. 12. Are the trees on the east side of the site part of Swift Transportation property? If they are located on this site, will they be retained and protected during the building demolition? The trees and landscaping currently on site will not be disturbed during the building demolition. The building to be removed during this scope of work is a safe distance from any of the landscaped areas. Please feel free to contact me at 206 - 730 -4974 with any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, SABE S RUCTION INC. Do as N. Gardner Senior Project Manager Attachment: City of Tukwila letter dated 8/24/05 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor August 24, 2005 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mr. Douglas Gardner Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International Blvd., 4th Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 RECEIVED AUG 2 5 2005 Sabey Corp. RE: E05 -010 Soil Remediation Project at 3600 South 124th Street Dear Mr. Gardner: Staff has had an opportunity to review the draft Remediation Plan for the site prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (DOF) dated June 24, 2005. We have the following questions or comments. 1. Will additional characterization of the contaminated areas be done prior to remediation as recommended in the report? It is unclear from the report prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. if you intend to carry out the additional characterization prior to remediation or if the areas to be excavated and removed will be determined in the field during remediation. 2. Were any solvent analyses performed as part of the analytical work carried out on samples from the vicinity of the waste oil tank? 3. Is the groundwater contaminated: Ii scans likely there is corn ; groundwater contaii-thiation since the water table is so shallow. Is any remediation proposed for groundwater short of source control (i.e. removal of the contaminated soil)? Where will contaminated groundwater be disposed? 4. What is the proposed schedule for site remediation? 5. Will you seek a No Further Action Determination from Ecology? If so, when? 6.. When will the draft plan be finalized? CL q: \E05 -010 \Technical Comments.doc Page 1 of 2 08/24/2005 10:46 AM h?nn .Snuthrpntpr Rnulpvard .Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. Douglas Gardner Sabey Corporation August 24, 2005 7. Will the existing 10,000 - gallon diesel AST identified on Figure 2 be retained on site? If so, does the tank have secondary containment and is there an adequate spill prevention control and countermeasure plan for the tank and dispenser? If not, will this area be checked for soil contamination as well? If the tank is retained on the site, any future site user must follow Ecology regulations for fuel dispensing. 8. The plan suggests that the clean up may be done under the Department of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program. Have you decided whether to participate in this program or not? 9. Please identify where the contaminated soils will be disposed. 10. What is the result of your evaluation of the use of oxygen release compound to address any residual petroleum hydrocarbons left in the soil? 11. Please provide a brief narrative on the storm drainage system on -site. How does the site drain? Is there a storm drainage system on the site? 12. Are the trees on the east side of the site part of Swift Transportation property? If they are located on this site, will they be retained and protected during the building demolition? Please provide responses to the above questions. The information you provide will be used in the preparation of the staff report for the SEPA determination. If you have any questions, please call me at 206 - 431 -3661. Sincerely, atA1-( 0".1� Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor Sandra Whiting, Urban Environmentalist Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer CL Page 2 of 2 08/24/2005 10:47 AM q:\E05 -010 \Technical Comments.doc I Norita Deckard - Swift Transportation site ils remediation @ 3600 s 124th St E05 -010 Page 1 From: Joanna Spencer To: Donald Tomaso Date: 8/15/05 10:57AM Subject: Swift Transportation site- soils remediation @ 3600 s 124th St E05 -010 PW is in the process of reviewing Planned Action SEPA for the subject site. It states that all the UG storage tanks were removed, however there is no record of any permits in Permits +. Usually PW issues a land altering permit. In 1995 a SEPA E95 -0027 was issed for UG storage tanks removal, which suggests that these tanks were remove in 1995 or later. Did the FD issu any permit(s) for UG storage tanks removal. Can you examine your records ? >Thanks, Joanna • • MEMORANDUM August 12, 2005 TO: Carol FROM: Sandra RE: Swift Transportation Site — Soil Remediation Plan I have reviewed the draft Remediation Plan for the site prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (DOF) dated June 24, 2005. The plan appears to be very preliminary and is more of a strategy than a plan. It does not contain as'much detail as a typical remediation plan would have and proposes to leave much of the decision - making up to the eventual remediation contractor. Also, the actual volumes of contaminated soils have not yet been determined, but are rough estimates based on samples collected in probes. Additional site characterization (using test pits) has been recommended to further define the contaminated areas requiring excavation. It is unclear if the applicant intends to carry out the additional characterization prior to remediation or if the areas to be excavated and removed will be determined in the field during remediation. The plan suggests that the clean up may be done under the Department of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program. Under the program, Ecology reviews the cleanup report and makes a determination as to whether the cleanup is likely to meet regulatory requirements under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). The applicant must pay a fee for this review and it can take several weeks to get a determination from Ecology. As a preliminary plan, the proposed remediation approach seems acceptable. However, I would ask the applicant the following questions: 1. Will additional characterization of the contaminated areas be done prior to remediation as recommended in the report? 2. Were any solvent analyses performed as part of the analytical work carried out on samples from the vicinity of the waste oil tank? 3. Is groundwater contaminated (it seems likely since the water table is so shallow) and is any remediation proposed for groundwater short of source control (i.e. removal of the contaminated soil)? 4. What is the proposed schedule for site remediation? 5. Does the applicant plan to seek a No Further Action Determination from Ecology? If so, when? 6. When will the draft plan be finalized? In relation to the proposed action, will the existing 10,000 - gallon diesel AST be retained on site? If so, does the tank have secondary containment and is there an adequate spill prevention control and countermeasure plan for the tank and dispenser? ma_ %r6^,i d� ESRI ArcExplorer 2.0 Former Swift Transportation Site City Limits parcl_05 streets 0 Water Bodies Tuesday, Aug 9 2005 ESRI ArcExplorer 2.0 Former Swift Transportation Site City Limits parcl_05 streets 0 Water Bodies Tuesday, Aug 9 2005 Print Map Page King County Home News Services. Former Swift Transportation Site I 10 M9041 1023G190�3 10 1023049074 1023049075 13v � t #21 7345600055 9 1023049081 7345600095 1 p /345600055 7345800046 1 7345600045 ST tM 1023049082 (C) 21)02,1Gng Cowin 1 ' 7345600385 0 4 it Parcel Number 7345600055 Address 3600 S 124TH ST Zipcode 98168 Taxpayer INMTERNATIONAL GATEWAY EAST The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." • Comments King County 1 GIS Center' News! Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Search e45- bbd's{ Page 1 of 1 http://www5.metroke.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 08/09/2005 King County: Assessor Property Characteristics Report • King County Home News 4` Services • Comments By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Search Assessor Real Property Records: INMTERNATIONAL Parcel Number Taxpayer GATEWAY EAST Tax Year 2004 Tax Status TAXABLE Account Number Levy Code Taxable Value Reason 7345600055 7345600055.00 2413 NONE OR UNKNOWN Appraised Land Value $572,600 Taxable Land Value $572,600 Appraised Improvement Value $611,400 Taxable Improvement Value $611,400 Taxpayer GATEWAY EAST Tax Year 2005 INMTERNATIONAL Tax Status TAXABLE Parcel Number Account Number Levy Code Taxable Value Reason 7345600055 734560005500 2413_ 1 NONE OR UNKNOWN Appraised Land Value $572,600 Taxable Land Value $572,600 Appraised Improvement Value $697,900 Taxable Improvement Value $697,900 Assessor Property Sales Records: Tip: Use the Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report to see more sales records details Sale Date 6/14/2005 (Sale Price I$2,600,000. Seller Name VICTOR ENTERPRISES LLC Plat Name RIVERTON ADD Buyer Name INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY EAST IV LLC Plat Block Sale Date 5/4/1995 (Sale Price 1$0 Seller Name DIPIETRO VICTOR PUBLIC Buyer Name VICTOR ENTERPRISES LLC Sale Date 9/2/1994 (Sale Price I$0 Seller Name DIPIETRO CAROLYN PURVIS Buyer Name DIPIETRO VICTOR Assessor Parcel Records: District Name TUKWILA Property Name INCO EXPRESS TRANSIT WAREHOUSE Property Type COMMERCIAL Plat Name RIVERTON ADD Present se Warehouse Plat Block 2 Water System WATER DISTRICT Plat Lot 1 THRU 8 & Sewer System PUBLIC Page 1 of 3 http: / /www5.metrokc.gov/ reports /property_report.asp ?PIN= 7345600055 08/09/2005 King County: Assessor Property Characteristics Report Lot Area 95,445 SqFt (2.19 acres) Access PUBLIC Section/Township /Range SW 10 23 4 Street Surface PAVED Assessor Legal Description Records: Account Number 734560005500 'Record Number 101 - 03 Legal Description 1 THRU 8 & 2 RIVERTON ADD LOT 1 THRU 8 TGW POR OF VACATED ST ADJ LESS CO RD TGW LOT 16 TGW POR OF VACATED ST ADJ LESS CO RD — AKA LOT B OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJ NO 90 -7 -BLA RECORDING NO 9009171031 Assessor Commercial Building Records: Address 3600 S 124TH ST 98168 Building Number 1 Building Quality AVERAGE Number of Buildings 1 Building Description INCO TRANSIT WHSE Year Built 1972 Construction Class WOOD FRAME Gross SqFt 9950 Shape Rect or Slight Irreg Net SqFt 9950 Sprinklers N Stories 1 Elevators SPACE HEATERS Heating System SPACE HEATERS Predominant Use WAREHOUSE, DISTRIBUTION (407) Building Number 2 Building Quality AVERAGE Number of Buildings 1 Building Description INCO SERVICE GARAGE WITH OFFICE Year Built 1972 Construction Class PREFAB STEEL Gross SqFt 4000 Shape Rect or Slight Irreg Net SqFt 4000 Sprinklers N Stories 1 Elevators Heating System SPACE HEATERS Predominant Use GARAGE, SERVICE REPAIR (528) This report was generated: 8/9/2005 1:43:49 PM Related on -line resorts: [King County GIS: Property information FAQ King County Assessor: Submit a request to correct this information IDDES: Permit Applications Report King County: Districts and Development Conditions Report King County Assessor: eReal Property Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) [King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information [Recorders Office: Excise Tax Affidavits Report Page 2 of 3 http: / /www5.metrokc.gov/ reports /property_report.asp ?PIN= 7345600055 08/09/2005 King County: Assessor Property characteristics Report IfRecorders Office: Scanned images of plats, surveys, and other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: or Enter an address: Search King County 1 GIS Center 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 3 of 3 http: / /www5.metrokc.gov/ reports /property_report.asp ?PIN= 7345600055 08/09/2005 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor August 12, 2005 Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Douglas Gardner Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 RE: E05 -010, Planned Action SEPA Application Dear Mr. Gardner: Your application for Planned Action SEPA review of the demolition of two buildings and soil remediation to remove contaminated soils located at 3600 S. 124`h Street has been found to be complete on August 10, 2005 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to me. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. Currently, the Planned Action SEPA is under review by the Public Works and Planning Departments. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Senior Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 July 13, 2005 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Douglas Gardner 12201 Tukwila International B1, 4th Floor .Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Letter of Incomplete Application # 1 Development Permit Application D05 -233 Swift LLC — 3600 S 124`s Street Dear Mr. Gardner: This letter is to inform you that your application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on July 7, 2005, is determined to be incomplete. Before your application can continue the plan review process the following items need to be addressed: Planning Department: Brandon Miles, at 206 -431 -3684 if you have any questions regarding the attached. Please address the above comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Permit Center at (206) 433 -7165. Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: Permit File No. D05 -233 p: \planning \brenda\D05 -233 — incomplete Itr # 1.doc bh 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 7345600055 Address: 3600 S 124 ST TUKW Suite No: Tenant: SWIFT LLC PERMIT CONDITIONS Permit Number: D05 -233 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 07/07/2005 Issue Date: 1: ** *FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 2: The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 3: Accumulation of combustible waste material is prohibited during the demolition phase of this project. Remove and properly dispose of all waste material prior to the close of the working day and as often throughout the day as needed. 4: Removal of under ground flammable or combustable liquid tanks requires a special fire dept. permit obtained at the fire dept. 5: This review limited to speculative tenant space only - special fire permits may be necessary depending on detailed description of intended use. 6: Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. 7: These plans were reviewed by Inspector 512. If you have any questions, please call Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau at (206)575 -4407. * *continued on next page ** } doc: Conditions D05 -233 Printed: 08 -15 -2005 DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS July 12, 2005 Doug Gardener D05 -233 3600 S. 124th Street The Planning Division of DCD has reviewed the above permit application that was submitted on July 7, 2005. The application is incomplete and the Department requires the following: 1. The project must demonstrate compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A DNS was issued in 1995, but only for the removal of the tanks. The DNS did not address removal of the contaminated soils. This project may be eligible to be reviewed under the City's Planned Action SEPA process. The application for the Planned Action SEPA has been included. CITY OF TUKWILA • Community `Development Department Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Btuldtng Peinirt o,1 Mechantcal ertntf No Public Works Permit No • project No RECEIVED or office use only) f AUG 0 2 2005 Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or by fax. * *Please Print ** Site Address: 3600 S.124thlStreet, Tukwila, WA Tenant Name: n/a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT King Co Assessor's TaxNo.: 7345600055 Suite Number: n/a Floor: n/a New Tenant: ❑. Yes ❑ ..No Property Owners Name: In Mailing Address: 12201 Tukwila Int I. Blvd .. 4th Floor, Seatt] e WA City /_. • 1 . Name: Douglas Gardner , - • • a - 9R] 68 State Zip Day Telephone: 206 - 730 -4974 cell Mailing Address: 12201 Tukwila Int' 1. Blvd.. 4th Floor. Seattle, WA 9816R City E -Mail Address: dougg @sabey. com State Fax-Number: 706- 329 -0069 Zip GENERAL CONTRAC)'OR`INFORMATION - (Mechanical Contractor information on back page) Company Name: Sabey Construction Inc . Mailing Address: 12201 Tukwila Tnt'1. R1vd. 4th Flonr, Spa rrl', WA 9ft1F,ft City Contact Person: Douglas Gardner E -Mail Address: dougg @sabey. com State Zip Day Telephone: 206- 730 -4974 cell Fax Number: 206 - 329 -0062 Contractor Registration Number: SABEYCI033KM Expiration Date: 01 /06/07 * *An original or notarized copy of current Washington State Contractor License must be presented at the time of permit issuance ** ARCHITECT: OF` RECORD - All plans must be wet stamped by Architect of Record Company Name: Mailing Address: N/A Contact Person: E -Mail Address: City Day Telephone: Fax Number: State Zip ENGINEER OF RECORD ,= All plans must be wet stamped by Engineer of Record Company Name: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, MailingAddress:10827 N.E. 68th Street, Suite B., Kirkland, WA 98033 City State Day Telephone: 425 - 827 -4588 x204 Fax Number: 425- 739 -9885 Inc. Contact Person: Matt Dalton E -Mail Address: mdalton @dofnw. com \permits plus\ice changes \permit application (7 -2004) Pagel Zip Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ .53M 3 5,90 Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Rilfer to Dalton, Olmsted & Fug/lemand Report dated gal. 14/ 1,/ G .vIO 4— 6 744 iC .�/iG (I Li /roet/ cc o ✓ !� . Existing Building Valuation: $ 6/24/05, attached. Will there be new rack storage? ❑ ..Yes © .. No If "yes ", see Handout No. for requirements. Provide ;All :Building Areas in;Square Footage Below l'.`: Floor ' <. :..`.... Existing Addition to Existing Structure New:: Type of Construction per IBC Type: Of Occupancy per.: IBC... .: 2, d Floor.:: 3t' Floor'' Floors: Basement: Accessory. Structure* . A Attached Garage: Detached Garage'..: Attached'Carport::: . Detached.: Carport: Covered Deck:<> Uncovered :Deck • PLANNING DIVISION: Single- family building footprint (area of the foundation of all structures, plus any decks ova 18 inches and overhangs greater than 18 inches) n/ a For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: n/a Lot Area (sq ft): Floor area of principal dwelling: Floor area for accessory dwelling: *Provide documentation that shows that the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. Number of Parking Stalls Provided: Standard: n /a Compact: Handicap: Will there be a change in use? ❑ ....Yes n/a ❑ ..No If "yes ", explain: FIRE PROTECTION/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: n/a 0.. Sprinklers ❑..Automatic Fire Alarm ❑..None ❑ . Other (specify) Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? ❑ .. Yes .... ❑ ...No If "yes", attach list of materials and storage locations on a separate 8 -1/2 x 11 paper indicating quantities and Material Safely Data Sheets. \permits plus\icc changes\permit application (7 -2004) Page 2 Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Refer to Dalton, Olmsted & Fugievand Report dated 6/24/05, attached. Call before you Dig: 1- 800 - 424-5555 Please refer to Public Works Bulletin. #1 for fees and. estimate sheet.. Water District ❑ ...Tukwila. El... Water District # 125 ❑ ...Water Availability Provided ❑ .. Highline ❑....Renton Sewer District ❑ ...Tukwila E... ValVue ❑ .. Renton ❑ ...Seattle ❑ .:.Sewer Use Certificate 0... Sewer Availability Provided ❑ .. Approved Septic Plans Provided ❑ ...Septic System - For onsite septic system, provide 2 copies of a current septic design approval by King County Health Department. Submitted with Application (mark boxes which apply): ❑...Civil Plans (Maximum Paper Size — 22" x 34 ") ❑ ...Technical Information Report (Storm Drainage) ® .. Geotechnical Report ❑...Traffic Impact Analysis ❑ ...Bond ❑ .. Insurance ❑ .. Easement(s) ❑ .. Maintenance Agreement(s) 0... Hold Harmless Proposed Activities (mark boxes that apply): ❑ ...Right -of -way Use - Nonprofit for less than 72 hours ❑ .. Right -of -way Use - Profit for Tess than 72 hours ® ...Right -of -way Use - No Disturbance ❑ .. Right -of -way Use — Potential Disturbance ❑ ...Construction/Excavation/Fill - Right-of-way Non Right -of -way * 21 OD ; 5300 c.y ❑ ...Total Cut cubic yards ▪ 1 ❑ .. Work in Flood Zone ❑ ...Total Fill * cubic yards , ❑ .. Storm Drainage *Refer to Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand Report; attached. ❑ ...Sanitary Side Sewer ❑ .. Abandon Septic Tank ❑ .. Grease Interceptor © ...Cap or Remove Utilities ❑ ...Curb Cut ❑ .. Channelization ❑ ...Frontage Improvements ❑ .. Pavement.Cut ❑ .. Trench Excavation ❑ ...Traffic Control ❑ .. Looped Fire Line ❑ .. Utility Undergrounding ❑ ...Backflow Prevention - Fire Protection " Irrigation Domestic Water " ❑ ...Permanent Water Meter Size... WO# ❑ ...Temporary Water Meter Size .. WO# ❑ ...Water Only Meter Size WO# ❑ ...Sewer Main Extension Public Private ❑ ...Water Main Extension Public Private ❑ ...Deduct Water Meter Size FINANCE INFORMATION Fire Line Size at Property Line Number of Public Fire Hydrant(s) ❑ ...Water . 0... Sewer 0... Sewage Treatment Monthly Service Billing to: Name: International Gateway East IV LLC Day Telephone: 206 - 281 -8700 Mailing Address:12201 Tukwila Int' 1. Blvd. , 4th Floor, Seattle, WA 98168 City State Zip Water Meter Refund/Billing: Name: International Gateway East IV LLC Day Telephone: 206- 281 -8700 Mailing Address: 12201 Tukwila Int'1. Blvd., 4th Floor, Seattle, WA 98168 City State Zip %permits plusticc clnngalpermit application (7 -2004) Page 3 MECHANICAL PERMIT INFORMATION -.206-4-31-3670 MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name:,:; To Be Determined Mailing Address: City. State Zip Contact Person: Day Telephone: E -Mail Address: Fax Number: Contractor Registration Number: Expiration Date: * *An original or notarized copy of current Washington State Contractor License must be presented at the time of permit issuance ** Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ Scope of Work (pleast provide detailed information): Use: Residential: New .... ❑ Replacement ❑ Commercial: New .... ❑ Replacement ❑. Fuel Type: Electric ❑ Gas ....0 Other: Indicate type of mechanical work being installed and the quantity below: Unit Type: Qty _ : Unit Type: Qty : Unit Type: Qty Boiler/Compressor: Qty B.TU Air Handling Unit >10,000 CFM Fire Damper 0 -3 HP /100,000 BTU Furnace>100K BTU Evaporator Cooler Diffuser 3 -15 HP /500,000 BTU Floor Furnace Ventilation Fan Connected to Single Duct Thermostat 15 -30 HP /1,000,000 BTU Suspended/Wall/Floor Mounted Heater Ventilation System Wood /Gas Stove 30 -50 HP /1,750,000 BTU Appliance Vent Hood and Duct Water Heater 50+ HP /1,750,000 BTU Repair or Addition to Heat/Refrig/Cooling System Incinerator - Domestic Emergency Generator Air Handling Unit <10,000 CFM Incinerator — Comm/Ind Other Mechanical Equipment PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES - Applicable to all permits in this application Value of Construction -.In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review — Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform:Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJU • LAWS OFT. STA r OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. BUILDING OWN Signature: Print Name: Douglas N. Gardner Date: Day Telephone: 206- 730 -4974 cell Mailing Address:12201 Tukwila Int 1. Blvd. , 4th Floor, Seattle, WA 98168 City Date Application Accepted: 07 0 C� \permits plus\icc changes\permit application (7 -2004) Date Application Expires: 0/ 07 06 Page 4 State Staff //Initials: h Zip Date: 3/22/05 Tukwila Fire Department OPERATIONAL PERMIT By virtue of The Provisions of the International Fire Code adopted by City of Tukwila Ordinance, Victor Enterprises located at 3600 South 124th Street having made application in due form, and as the conditions, surrounding, and arrangements are, in my opinion, such that the intent of the Ordinance can be observed, authority is hereby given and the PERMIT is granted for To install, alter, remove, abandon or otherwise dispose of a flammable or combustible liquid tank per Chapter 34 of the International Fire Code* 149 -05 This PERMIT is issued and accepted on condition that all Ordinance provisions now adopted, or that may hereafter be adopted, shall be complied with. THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR - Ninety Days- This permit does not take the place of any License required by law and is not transferable. Any change in use or occupancy of premises shall require a new permit Fire Marshal THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON THE PREMISES MENTIONED ABOVE TFIt /FP #7 4 7'77 3 -22 -65/ TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL PERMIT APPLICATION • # //7 PER INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, SECTION 105, OPERATIONAL PERMIT(S) ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY PERSON, FIRE OR CORPORATION TO USE A BUILDING OR PREMISE OR ENGAGE IN ANY ACTIVITIES FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES LISTED BELOW: ( ) To use, store or handle flammable or combustible liquids. (I.F.C. 105.6.17, Ch. 34) ( ) To store, transport on site, dispense, use or handle hazardous materials. (I.F.C. 105.6.21, table #105.6.21, Ch. 27) ( ) To store and use LP -gas and operate cargo tankers that transport LP -gas. (IFC 105.6.28, Ch. 38) ( ) To operate repair garages and automotive, marine and fleetThotor fuel- dispensing facilities. (I.F.C. 105.6.40, Ch. 22) ( ) To operate a place of assembly: (I.F.C. 105.6.35, Ch. 10)) ( ) To conduct hot work. (I.F.C. 105.6.24, Ch. 26) ( ) To conduct a spraying or dipping operation utilizing flammable or combustible liquids or the application of combustible powders. (I.F.C. 105.6.42, Ch. 15) ( ) To use any building or portion thereof exceeding 500 sq. ft. for high -piled combustible storage. (I.F.C. 105.6.23, Ch. 23) ( ) To store, transport on site, dispense, use or handle at normal temperatures and pressures compressed gases in excess of the amounts listed in Table #105.6.9. (I.F.C. 105.6.9, Ch. 30) ( ) To erect or operate a tent or air - supported temporary membrane structure having an area in excess of 200 square feet, or any canopy in excess of 400 square feet. (I.F.C. 105.6.44, Ch. 24) APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE BY THE UNDERSIGNED FOR A PERMIT TO (USE, INSTALL, CONDUCT) IN OR ON THE FOLLOWING PREMISES: Business Name: 1// n �r r, sc 5 Address: 34, s ,' $ WITHIN 30 DAYS, THIS APPLICATION MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 07) , TO THE TUKWILA FIRE' DEPARTMENT, 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST., TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98188. THE ACTUAL PERMIT WILL BE MAILED TO YOU AT THE COMPLETION OF YOUR INSPECTION PROCESS. Rev. 11/1/04 <, T.F.D. FORM F.P. 6 • • IIICTOR 7/2te/y -it16 es% LLC 16400 Southcenter Parkway, #308 • Seattle, WA 98188 • (206) 394 -9630 • Fax (206) 394 -9633 March 17, 2005 Attn: Don Tomase Tukwila Fire Department 444 Andover Park E Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: 3600 S 124th St Dear Mr. Tomase: Enclosed is a check in the amount of $100 to obtain a permit for the closure of the above ground fuel tank located at 3600 S 124th Street. The tank was sold and removed on March 16, 2005. I am also enclosing copies of the manifests from Safety -Kleen indicating the removal and disposal of the remaining fuel in the tank before transport. Please mail the permit to me at the above address. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, VICTOR ENTERPRISES, LLC Karen Swartley Executive Assistant Enclosures IOW: ..,--;t7.1,::::, -:-.:,) " -_-. - - ' *.• ': ,- ,-,..., -. • .i 1' n-- .,-,. '-' ' + ' "4= 0 ZZF • + - .41/4 - s TVH- --;.:. • -- '!" - - ' :'' ..3. - ; 1.p-- -.E ., q..pitvi*,-,:- • • - .. lik.=. . •-..11.4:1-..7.' - I f:,"-Le riti Frittitil - --.:.w -.. t_ .-ti , - ,..- . ----,, -0..., _ ._ ..---- - iLa-•::,-..-. ' . .- ' ,-.,,,.: - "t• A .A.,..i,- ' ------ - -,---:-:.:-------11/52108 1.)T414'3.6111 -.INNS : 5111-111111111112VISINON-11111111 II __ _ • II- -- Min ,a. /l-pp alIl , U1 EtliR1/ yl 11 1111111 LOCATION - .. .. ! . .... M 1 MNIM TYPE CHAIN 00UN IY =2=2 ... 1:te--71,7,V•4=1- 1 1 I 1-TIT1 ILli I - • ' IIIIIII 111 Ill 1 ITJ EVGY: 7-7-1-1 I - , L - _ ?* , TERRITORY &IV • . i-' • L_LLLL1 I 1 - . . TAX EXEMPTION 143. _a_ _A.....1--r• - E CE 0 .TE SALES REP NO. CUS TOMER R.O. NUMBER CUSTONTER P1-101,E N TAX CODE .2.. AsSoc. WOE SERVICE TAX CAMS. -TAX PRODUCT TAX ea I " i . . . t'i ---t-Tr. • SEHViCE; MODUCT SURVEY &MODER UNIT PRICE QUANTITY CHARGE SALES TAX TOTAL CHLORINE TEST RESULTS SK ear NUMBER sERv CC TERNI ii0ToNTERki, ('‘IT ''. PIO. .:RELEASE NO. aripaieE ........isrp: MRS F.Y. .CHLORe.TEGT RIMLIS I TrtIV1 ATI-1 NAM A 0 atildras - Ds, . a - 7 .7_s". n -10 --. .9437 7 100 a2/it6r7 - c 0 0 00 0 0 . l HEM mar , IBM f fr , 1 r « ■,t" - 0 0 . TOTAL-SERVICEJPRODUCTS 7 MOO l ' TAMS TPA .19PORTER GATE 0 / 1,5—/ 0 CAPACITY x ' GENERATOR STATUS: CHECK OX BELOW - - NIANIFESTNO." - LISEF'ATRANSF'"CiFiT'EFk•fb Oa GENERATOR: HAZARDOUS WASIE CLASSIFICATZN ' vEHIGLE FUROR Y OTHER HON-VEHICLE FLUIDS I NO PREQU AL REOUIRED.NO HALOGEN 15T EST 2 NO PRECANCL REQUIRED. HALOGEN TEST AT PCX-UP 3 PRECIIAL HEOUIRED. NO HALOGEN TEST 4 pnt-owiREatuRED. HALOGEN TEST AT PICK-HP - RETS.I2 TO REVISE SOF FOR DEPGIIPCNS -- — - — - SSGHRTUFIE TXP.0000.50930 FACIL:TY _ 0 / J / 0 GENERATOR USEPA It) NO. • GENEAAT OR STATE lb NO. CESQG • 3 SOG:LCIG • • 2 0 4 SIGNATURE 11. US DO: DES1-1-11KTION (INCLUDING PROPER SHIPPING NAME, HAZARD CLASS, AND HI) 12' CONY ACIEF1S 13. TOTAL 1K Ofr KLAIBER .• . _GIN O FICE , .. . . ri-- /o o 1 2700 . _ NTERMEDIATE FA9ILI NAME A AD RESS SAFEV/-71.16LSYS TENS, USA EPA ID NO irl A.0071 i STATE ID NO. 7 '171 GASH 0 •••• .E-2_ TOTAL RECEIVE:. APPLY PAYMENT 1 Oc i CHARGE HY AMOUNT FOR THIS "TRANSACIION UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED M THE PAYMENT RECEIVED SECTION. C..6.....10. ,MI f... •6.........d ..A.U...... A.M.a. 0.1.014 TWIV1 - AM leband, 4na 1.1n isoopor andthrs tor Winvolaillso MOM*. IP tha wpsesis. nriki.dm...11 ** it 3. terAnnaur1.1na.rAnwp.i..en. uxt. awl:nodal Tft.9.A.,... TOTAL DUE a e„..,,7 ,....,:_:„ CHECK NtPARER -- 1,..: 7 . ( •.- .:',".:11.i 0 TODAY'S sumwseLE n",,,OISSBALPACt/IEMXMCS 00 P.M WRIT E IN THI-: AREA REI.(3w P001174226 025016 - •-• - _ ., , - . - .. ' - INVOICE 1 AINCUNT S INVOICE il 3.-- AmouNT s 1 I - S r DOGE /1 NT RE INCORPORATED REHM Psint Cklf PAIL- ' IT RADE A PART HEREOF. 1 D ; . • . _ . , - 0,1r MEDD; CABS) l ig.: -...__T ., ' 1 rI THE r'..H.' ku:;.r. • • • .... _ 1.-T17-r71-1- -• • I , 1 ! J 1 - j_. i ' 1 - -'i '' -c-• • • r" 1....li'`""T"t"'"I'll". I r i. i• - 1 s : P 001226952 • I atm. _ . 1253 939-20221 KEVIN LIGHTER .7 • FROM LOCATION) -• NAME ''''', TITLE SIGFI BILL TO: (IF DIFFERENT --,• . ..: • - ' I ill b 2 t. N I e- C f 1 LIE Ii. v. 1 c- ONO 1111111ari K i 5- E • - 2 ' . • ,z •. . ...:,; ...... iftliATI. ATTENTION' 0 ' , i wpm.% . . • = • 1 'T I 11111 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOCATION c s ni ( 13112 LI / E YURI 3 1 E UE M S'S CHAIN 0.rrEA .10u sipic pNR ..6 0 . . , ill .-, 1 a- [ L- . W" , , E 11111q E I I 1 1] 1 1 I 1 I 4 // ... 6 .> , ..',,, e. ;i,,, 4 :A I Ar:- ,.IT: 4l, V V; Ty(; .. . ,, ,.;:i ,,'', ,""11,.4 ,1. ;''':' I , ...1.,1,.,, .. .t.i. eL Y ..c. Pi. ei ! • • : " t ' RRITORY i : TX EXEMPTION I I ."') .;,.'..,''r".'.-.ic"?l, '.'a .r . , '' ':'' : , — "T I N ) Ye r t'.4i'. v,.,.•,, k ' ' t• '.;• 'i,- ti '... ' . • a.: -i ,:: :f:r , 'I e :, E4 -'...4 n" *6 1 -sorItz'--(t..,s._, ,'7-e.,7s.4•1;., , 50 . r. ..:14..t- ) i •. ' , l'a• kP i i,,N,A.,T .2':Srfie7 '. . ..S.....7. ( 7I d(S sa, - A n/ i, ,,,' .... ,,, • 1 ,, .'r4 iVICE DATE SLE$IREJNO CUSTOMER P.O. NUMBER ' CUSTOMER PHONE ii TAX CODE HANDUNG CODE ASSOC. CODE SERVICETAX C.O.M.S. TAX PRODUCT TAX --,..57-3 • ..)/ SERVICE/ PRODUCT SURVEY NUMBER UNIT PRICE QUANTITY CHARGE SALES TOTAL CHLORINE TEST RESULTS SK DOT NUMBER C SERVICP TERM CHANGE -SERVICE (WEEKS TERM (INITIAL QeekE scH.DA17 (YV WW PROMO NO. RELEASE NO. TAX CHARGE • HALOGEN PASS TESTER FAL CHLOR.D-TECT RESULTS (PPM) TESTERS noTIALS Ait i . O ,.... :._, Y.4.0,4 • !a:, cc,. i ccp 3 i,..1 - --; - „,Z.-45.-t7 • 0 r•-• C.. .1 Z.( .-6'cl 0 • ..... i / --- •,,, . , ,.. /5 • • I_Iti,tip. , 1.; -I, ,,.._ : c, • 0 ,. OTAL-SERVICE/PRODUCTS ...,,,,. 4'9. : .,_ :,..71 TANK CAPACITY . k TRANSPORTER 1 DATE 0- /2; / 5. I r • .t..•k......../../ ' • s91\p„,t ., ---..„,"----- , ... .._, • GENERATOR STATUS: CHECK ONLY ONE BOX BELOW - .L411-0,b1019. , ;:-.11,00.03,,,XTAN :0:„Olit.TERIADS161, TXR 000050930 - ",° '0,31.3.TAVIN40 . ''' PRINT NAME 1 , FACILITY • .) ( • ,,,,Ni. L.., \,,,ki -7"-- SIGNATURE DATE , i i , ,•,. - 1,2,.,-,;‘,....: ,_....' ".--"---- GENERATOR i.frie: 4.A13D08..wAsti LASSIEICATION 7. :,',VEHICLE'," Fwicis,':`. ',:;IONLY ,7 4e., OTHEFk.::Z', ',NON-VEHICLE 1,4 FLUIDS ... , . 1 NO PREOUAL REQUIRED, NO HALOGEN 2 NO PREOUAL REQUIRED. HALOGEN 3 PREOUAL REQUIRED, NO HALOGEN 4 PREOUAL REOUIRED, HALOGEN • REFER TO REVERSE SIDE FOR TEST TEST AT PICK UP TEST . GE RAMP SiP,- lITG.;:',;;;,,,Eik it. CES.00,:`,.iit(":. al • • 3 TEST AT PICK-UP DEFINITIONS ; !$0.01L1:4",,b= . • 2 • 4 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE • US DOT DESCRIPTION (INCLUDING PROPER SHIPPING NAME, HAZARD CLASS, AND ID. ) 12. CONTAINERS NO. TYPE 13. QUAO TNTITY TAL 14. UNIT INTNOL SK DOT NUMBER .......-------- . ------ -....- 850' ...,...: ED OIL 1 , 1 . ND WATER ? I 1 X TLIP il t../ 12700 CT U8r07'LiA:!!:"ZIDOU !-..."..TET,—:.:., . , . s , R . -ERMEDIATE FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS • . „SAFETY—KLEE:I-I -3 :Li c-2. 4.1 /,.:,1,,, , P. „ cA., i-A ;,...,,-; ,; 6.24, USA EPA ID NO. i,ett)r1 i .i: °:_r/ SYSTEMS', ...". STATE ID NO. CASH • TOTAL RECEIVED APPLY PAYMENT TO: - CHARGE MY ACCOUNT FOR THIS TRANSACTION UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THE PAYMENT RECEIVED SECTION. C'eetwew eeee?'" thw e.'e ebeee-eweee "'Jade's we WePerlY eeeeWeee• "'we'd' P0,k29", maned and labeled, sod ars in proper candtdon for transportation according to the aptineable regoisSoos 01 Ms U S. Erwin:Amens& Protection Agency and the U S. °span:nerd of Transpoltation. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE INCORPORATED HEREWITH MADE A PART HEREOF. Print ,J,-<,,-, ...- ,, .... '--,.. i 0 0 .4---r Vj, ,_..... TOTAL DUE • 7,.-" . I `.)-47 :f4..-/ / .._,. .. 8 8 CHECK NUMBER E T 1 1 / TODAY'S SERVICE/SALE • Ill PREVIOUS BALANCE AS FOLLOWS • DO NOT WRITE IN THE AREA BELOW P 00 ' 2269 52 • N INVOICE AMOUNT $ INVOICE # AMOUNT r o riouS MANIFEST CODE SEC/ # \ 2 DIT _, D NO . CREDIT CARD NO ,-....: •' x. -... ,k, .4;:i :t Akba....:«EXPi'DATE = c • - '• • " : :...,._.ii.,:::.1 _ ..: ., , : .....•■...".1 , .,,, .;-''' 11111111111H II :.,....,.. '-..t.t.vmig1111 IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY CALL 1-800-468-1760 (24 hours) ,....„1, f„tgzii4:,01 - ; -GENEI3ATOR/SHIPPER DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE ..1-,,,,..-.^.414, (OMER FIEFEMENCE. 1i* — Atiqratk. i• i I 1 1 1 1 ti -, - , . .. • - SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT UNDERGROUND /ABOVEGROUND FUEL TANK REMOVAL /INSTALLATION PERMIT PERMIT # S 1 ?)/ 5Z '-75; 50 3 5 975 RECEIPT # /W77 DATE RECEIVED %-%% ,5 DATE ISSUED FIRM NAME: CODE REFERENCE: 7901.3 /A/ &o 4XIiD/ZesS l ile FIRM ADDRESS: 3U66 SDUT/ / /7/" PHONE : .1a6 - 4 /Se -. JOB SITE: s irn,€ NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE REMOVED /MMSTABSED: INDIVIDUAL TANK CAPACITY (GALS): V 1d'e -"0 5ooe TOTAL AGGREGATE CAPACITY (GALS) : • 0D D NAME OF BUSINESS AT JOB SITE: .52MIZ 4s ,R.60/th- PERSON IN CHARGE: G°/17' L - 4.74 /5S PHONE: &- - -11/8-' .gt7d d To install, alter, remove, place temporarily out of service or otherwise dispose of any flammable or combustible liquid tank per 79.116 of the Uniform Fire Code. Installation or removal of underground tanks having an individual capacity or total aggregate capacity of greater than 10,000 gallons, and installation or removal of underground tanks located within 200 feet of the Green /Duwamish Rivers requires approval of the Tukwila Planning Department. All aboveground tank installations require approval of the Tukwila Planning Department. The Tukwila Planning Department will require submittal of a site plan for review prior to approvals. Planning Department: Approved A0 Signature: Not Approved Date: No fire department permit will be issued without Tukwila Planning Department approval when required. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE RETURNED WITH A SCALED DRAWING OF THE SITE AND YOUR CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $ , TO THE TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT, 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98188. TANKREMV.PER 8/8/95 T.F.D. Form F.P. 31 ; Al:;k1-.-::',S,::::..i.t.'.:::'•:;54.t,irl:':' 1:),t,•"..j,.‘C:: ,;=•.: ,',.. 1: "' :,± J-:.. ''.:. ',.;: : •:, :::,•••,,,..;.r• :•'.;:"4"i.,;:.,1 sit• -i : , 174: -- :;. :; ' • -'' -.., ::: - . ' ''''' ,- . '.: i . • i ' '" - '',.:-. • ' 2.: : .-; • ' --: : :* • ' Date 8/1/95 ,:! • . ,., i. ,: .,... ,.. - . .. ,..--:. : .., 3v,:t6.:,,..0,..• TUKWILA-FIREDEPART,MENT ,, ...• ‘4.-....,...),•,!`"op: :"<i4.11,,hi'''' !Jo' 4■4;•""'0'4414.' PECIALTERM IV' ... , , • , ..5:P4--,..?,,,:4,7,,,,i'Ait`t•t:'%'1!`;1',..?:14-..3.*:f.4 • 4,"44.-4,47, ',/ t44:1-r.',.4bil It .f.g:!.i-i1::fo $1). .... AO .l :., flf•-lv it''.1,- i Yo.firtue.of The Provisions of the Uniform'Fire Codeadoptedpy City of Tukwila.Ordinance '''' ''''''''..*::' ''''..7-', ''J.` '7 '• si -'" ''''!S-?.':f.... ;/,-'1!,f-i,'.4-k?..-1;1141%44Vt7;',Viit4.:511.4?1;t:ViPly`‘ftY,;.:s4.411'.Vh ress '-' Inc -- '-•*- --.E' ',''• :':"•,'. -,located'at sL...1360.01.`Scruttijrj24th.luc,....76t, Business Name,;`:, ,',.';1;:;-.?:::;',.T.,: -,;',;:1:;ti'jj'T.pla',V;-'„:„;:, ,:'-ilto,-;t:1;01,,teusiness.atieress.c.;,-re-: ,it.?,,,,,,,,:1,!4;,::.:,; ,„.,:.-. i:.'-i2:i',::,•:;--'::, '..,"::-3;f1`..14.;.:1;:i. v14.: R.,'.;,q;-,;),...,..-113.4.:i'Wes.;,10..;i4;.?r,;-4,4?P- * r, .■.?,1' having:7T, application in due form, and as,.tha,cohditions,.suffnunclArtgsita„%arfamiltVe%iftlig?„YipOinioni:Suct1; that the•i . tent of.the Otdinance:caM. be aUthority!i'ssrhferebY'Sgivenfeanl:th'isvr PERMITi:isg7r:nted fo. r, .--, ,- t TO 1,Ins tal ,;.. ,ter,-y!.remove ,-, place :temporar-4.1yi.optCofservi.cetfor;othe'rwis'eV , . . ,dispose .t... of', any flarrmable :. orIcombustibleliquidltank . - n. ., • : ,... i:,..,..,I.t,-.,. -,..,..v.,,4,,,ii,11.--,......-4Fire,i-R-vb.7- -K.) 49, t..,.•.0. ''' 7:Uniform. Fire Co '."..' '''''Pl,'...‘ 'A '.:;;`,01.°1; I c ' ' ' • ' ' 4 . 4 VI 1/4ki° 1. *., ±.: , • - • :'!4`, v. •'. ..".yi '''•V",, "i•I''' 11:;{.1171,v, -‘, ...;44,e • 1"Wi This permit does not take the place 01 any license required by law and is not transfer- able. Any change in the use or.occupancy of premises shall require a new permit. . . • TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT UNDERGROUND/ABOVEGROUND FUEL TANK REMOVAL /INSTALLATION PERMIT PERMIT # RECEIPT # %1771/ DATE RECEIVED g-" (JS DATE ISSUED CODE REFERENCE: 7901.3 FIRM NAME: //IMO ..X/°i'ZS.5 /d& FIRM ADDRESS: ‘.UO ei-if/ /017 JOB SITE: PHONE : 070(. Ail Y o2W O NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE RE I ED /INSTALLED: -� INDIVIDUAL TANK CAPACITY (GALS): TOTAL AGGREGATE CAPACITY (GALS): ©60 NAME OF BUSINESS AT JOB SITE: /4) f0 , , A'ES.s /416- • PERSON IN CHARGE: Z / / / 5 W 2 . 2 ' . S A7.4 76-S PHONE : °4'. To install, alter, remove, place temporarily out of service or otherwise dispose of any flammable or combustible liquid tank per 79.116 of the Uniform Fire Code. Installation or removal of underground tanks having an individual capacity or total aggregate capacity of greater than 10,000 gallons, and installation or removal of underground tanks located within 200 feet of the Green /Duwamish Rivers requires approval of the Tukwila Planning Department. All aboveground tank installations require approval of the Tukwila Planning Department. �/ Planning Department: Approved +C Signatu;p: Not Approved Date: A No fire department permit will be issued without Tukwila Planning Department approval when required. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE RETURNED WITH A SCALED DRAWING OF THE SITE AND YOUR CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $ , TO THE TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT, 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98188. • TANKREMV.PER 7/18/95 T.F.D. Form F.P. 31 This permit does not take the place of any license required by law and is not transfer- able Any change in the use or occupancy of premises shall require a new permit. • I TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT UNDERGROUND /ABOVEGROUND FUEL TANK REMOVAL /INSTALLATION PERMIT PERMIT # .357-Pc RECEIPT # /W2- DATE RECEIVED DATE ISSUED CODE REFERENCE: 79.116 FIRM NAME: 'ieD /- >,-1'?55 PHONE: 27S2)0 U FIRM ADDRESS: 3 O() S, / Z `� JOB SITE: 414+� NUMBER OF TANKS TO BE REMOVED INSTALLS) DPI`e_ NAME OF BUSINESS AT JOB SITE: .-1...rr c O 4F)(19,'9 f PERSON IN CHARGE: A tK? PHONE: 2--Ve- Uci To install, alter, remove, place temporarily out of service or otherwise dispose of any flammable or combustible liquid tank per 79.116 of the Uniform Fire Code. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE RETURNED WITH A SCALED DRAWING OF THE SITE AND YOUR CHECK IN THE AMOUNT OF $ SD °° , TO THE TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT, 444 ANDOVER PARK EAST, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, 98188. TANKREMV.PER T.F.D. Form F.P. 31 77) ? bP. L ).✓E 5cAL Hous Ex/57-8./ G GONGR4TE PAYI1./6 isT/NG 4000 SF MA/NTEI`IANGE. EXI5T/f Olc_ WA -TER, SEPE(ZATOK one eaaL NAB OIL riot frtow` _Ex /sr-NG PAVING New On_ SEPERATOg NEw GONG. I FL,,L. PAD I >i',4 v�% / 0,- etjs • © ��S�A/t l "= /the), 7-AAN F007" lNU DSPENSING PAD TA1,IK FoorlNG K bi _p 0/-0 f: 5c7�aEs M� Kbe- F7 7 o sI ry � be r,.ea�^'‘ m�N, of //i eN��„�5 S 1 �o /� N/,nl. oC /� Zig �- !AV l No DATErecember 16, 1987 FIRE DI TRICT 1 IIKING COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE, 3600 -136th Place. Southeast, Suite A , Bellevue, Washington 98006 (206) 29676675 FEE. $180400' • PERMIT NO. • 5526 (R) PERMIT #HAZ2RAT .180, X10 TTL 1 8.0 0 0 TO MAINTA° N, STORE, USE .OR HANDLE MATERIALS, OR TO CONDUCT PROCESSES WHICH .P' H •' ON I C HAZARDOU TO LIFE OR PROPERTY, OR TO INSTALL EQUIPMENT USED IN CONNECTION WIT H AMIVITIM TO CONDUCT AND /OR MAINTAIN A PLACE OF PUBLIC.ASSEMBLY FOR 50 OR MORE PERSON 05:03 #0169E002 By virtue of the provisions of the UNIFORM FIRE CODE0334 l.f`8i9nty of King INCH EXPRESS.,: INC. 3600 South 124th Street, Seattle, . WA 98168 NAME Ot�tF BUSINESS OR CONCERN RESPONSIBLE PERSON: Ms. Kimberley A. Perrigo, Sr. Bookkeeper MAILING ADDRESS: Same ADDRESS OF BUSINESS (206) 248 -2700 PH.ONE.NO. Conductinga Trucking Business - Transportation 901# (BUSINESS) Having made application in due form, and as the conditions, surroundings, and arrangements are, in my opinion, such that the intent of the UNIFORM FIRE CODE can be observed, authority is hereby given and this PERMIT is GRANTED for: Description of Materials, Equipment, Activities: Two 10,000. gal. underground diesel storage tanks One 5,000 gal. underground gasoline storage tank One 250 gal. underground waste oil storage tank One 499 gal. LPG Tank *Cutting & Welding Repair Garage UFC 79.103 UFC 82.102 UFC 49.101 UFC 29.102 *Related oxygen storage, aggregate amount shall not exceed 6,000 cu, ft. and flammable gases storage, aggregate'amount shall not exceed 2,500 cu. ft.. This permit does not take the place of any License required by law and is not transferable. Any change in the use, occupancy, or ownership of premises shall require a new permit. $45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 This permit expires • December 16, 1989 An application for Renewal will be mailed to you before the Expiration Date. If the permit is to be renewed the application must be returned 15 DAYS PRIOR TO EXPIRATION. 4 THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED IN A•CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE PREMISES NOT TRANSFERABLE Craig Muller INSPECTED BY: Prevent Fires Save Lives F -E MARSHAL, KIFffa COUNTY -.4 7R.1,Ce, 15 HEW M .41 PAVIN ELK %GT gpf psY.A AJ tan., re..4 outer P.1/0111 rseir ;Jew , rotoi _ n r.4111rAvevagitc•Zr z 50 ...R... ma, five 1:174... osner • A oat tuna VS Of, cola. L11 Le, c . • iv xr...v4 we.yr I mccr. uut. (D .0 Toro 10.0. Ef- ,:*1 CUILIN) 1. IS a beg mug_ re.K..1 I eNJE.Mr•St TY jOtLAV 173,17M4 02 inesTCHED AREA mtvv*Org.14 &TAOS VI:611'411Y rit`N ; • Jul • - ' • • : •fr .rax • esysitv etry... • • " . • C --V ▪ • ; 0 • • -v GA. • I.EICMA.1426 5e6-now .2,2.1,kry22 • ••-. 22, f5S2ViE ,222•1.2,•,;:• •C. -2 .7 ■mr-' ..,- • P.Y.GrEnTy LAS uw icke Ot.LOPM 'Oa WEMELY 41o. 9,09f.17r11-/j1 MAI 45.01 061111CMC4 •EZ 1.61-1;i trl n7.0 were. l_f52N' „•4 f.".044. tftErF4, • 03,1. 4 d:C.HP r.c[4, or f -L4-•-""/ . • "'•■■•11M11111■■■•■■1 Al."11,Vaii 'MEW Oc••••0••%! , •••,veiv, na/11.1.4 0 .frxfp4 Ic4re.r, • r GerPSF. • 14.2 ....0.".141. CAM sia.■ C.. •,,,..1154 Al ",E �t 5 0.• c.65-41.4 0. • . , PREVENT .4, 6[6,.,5 .4.4,, 0 9 ..5 112.1 YU., 0.2.,19T:, 14--, • .91.2 tam. -..---, ..9 ) .g . :‘ m.........crLL1o..:,,,, ix :n4o7.2.)2. . • '.. P.2,2C 65. 4."5. 4 v 2Cr.."22 „ ,. 9?.1"1 ' .'''' ' /fg . 1.5. "e7,. .Lc . 2 2• ., t v. 7 .• 2 ..-, .-A ;"% W. • ..2..-2.24..2..,. 2.., -"Q v-.,: 7,.V cZ7'00fAS1-'fl -ns!, 7''cf''-'” 2.10 .=4-.-&7er ,-5.: , . . • .. .1 '14:: 714.:. 52;-..■,21.,2.. , 22Es,E, .S...2...2..-I..0..-F.. . J•••� ..222412:2 0,-1:2 S.1BP...; , -2,9. ..,,,-- .' ",Co....2 : 7., : •-. •...,. • 1 1 ,,,, ..„„,,Z,r.,...,4:, ..:.. . :„- .. .....n, 5 +AT.; . ,,A;,..,0, (‘[.,•.-) L:.:;,,”.:. .-L '•'6 11 le., . ', .. • . , ' • ' - ! , ''.:.'..e...f. 'FEE! 7.. \`..... ......./Vre.ALL'.., .."..9.. . '7.• Fy 9._, .7,,E,.,- )5.. (4•1111,,,.. .....t..; .., , . A,....,....`, '.k., -/- r.".. ,.., W115.. v017- , .., 7: .f• .• , cr. \ ' • 1117-Eic _ — - - c,rr. ,--v — 4-•• — • 1.•-• •-• ) [6-f•••;:io-E•E'r- r 72-f--..7 1' • 5ara-- LEGEN.:2 X. A.IvEP.T ELEvAnoN. :41,70Ur.7 ; Lr-ra- ir LNE — Wti...."9., , eV; E.I..f_LIA4c.N... /...A.-49t.gr • ■ r2- 150-S/ LSACORS >./r4,ZZAWIT"Alf.1AEAVI, worOS cO..n.E1 NIFORI,s1,04. :,•V• 1.1.1.4411410..1. 2_ -,,•••■•• I • A 740 s t- • 45' — E-APe-oe, • ' HARVEY R. DODO & ASSOC/ATER INC ■•••••114 Me.del7). 4■1 E., .1, , ..rn.e. • LA-1'1'4 an4e1/4.0 -1-7040 uf4 (4V41 fy/w\ SeP4- 311- ArTL.le5 (f5,101464 . L.P.PPIN:5 I R7- 0 m < rn r m Kt)* .ezt co (pcorm 1Z)/C cid 0(-) 1--15-- rwtc:CX0C) . Ft- °' r ' • 5..4.'f-c• - ' 1.:;,„ . .....-• . f.'i ,/e• 0 .. 21 ' f9..Z.1 .i • .. • . . • • •-0 40 30 : 5-1."‘:- • .. „,7,,ov : ' ... • - -if - , 5.. • • . • • ••••ver 2a 2o Qt•fr. •** • '.7- . • . • • 0:_t________J-H-----57:„on• - .1 r-.::.2.... oc•zi,P. . . : - - • ' .,,,,.: .. .' . 4,. „.3. .e..“ • .tc. tf...-Y . - --------1.1 i. . •, - ' - crk• . - • • — : 0.. - " virovv.c-• .•-. . --- • ''.- 3 .. o .9 --------- -- F 11-1 gyEXF 1I ®IT MAP FOR SOUTH 124TH STREET VACATION CITY OF 71;X MLA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON N10'p826 "W co L 107.06 Ifp 11221 NE COR Q LOT9 �I is �a I & & w H 0 � J4 I I a --L Pct �o ,ee 917103 _,,,• 9IA LOT, Pct q� "s0.� j3091(,4 N1254'37W 21.72' N10108'26'W 39.59' 0 50 100 -. 200 BLDG 21 -04 S891 8'50'E 68 N01'464Q2'E 60,01' SCALE; 1- = 100' SCUTH 124TH ST RIGHT —OF —WAY TO BE VACATED: 844 LQT4 4%1 2 OC -� 27 �% 466p0 1/27 38S N (VACATED PORTION OF 3g 35TH AVENUE SOUTH) 2'd eb6'ON SNUA3 CIAda Wdbs : E t SOOE ' S ' Df1H • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ' ' ° - RECEIVED AUG 0 2 2005' DEVELOPMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, �e�n�����rneers, contractors or other re resentatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property located at3600 S %2S4"s Ala+` r �V>GLu for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property unless the Toss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at !LAC t.t> 1 LW (city),W (state), on 00 LYST Z. , 20S .Tntf rn ok+fo1al C,0thua3 Fot. -4"_Er - -C (Print Name) %h- 17.Z.,®1 T Kw l v w�jruTtstn) rrT1 tat y FL (Address) Tv -W 11 0.f w P q g I (og - 51 Z Z0 6- 2J'81- o0 (P one N r b ►VV� ` ``,,,, ,.�,,,, (Sign On this day personally appeared before me J 1fl ' a r) )dY) to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. 0 BEFORE MARY A. HALL STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY - -- PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12-19 -05 ON THIS r�DAY OF 4v 9 0 .1 ARY PUBLIC residing at and fort e My Commission expires on C: W ora s_Fi les\Red_Book\sepaplan.doc,04 /22/03 tate of Washington 200 S.— PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and/or accessory use located within the MIC/L (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. yer•S. — �x r4 -rm34 Use. 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. flies — Sega COYl1VLerne PWcaGr44Fs 3. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? 4. Is the proposal any of the following: • a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200.or TMC 18.06.270; ti 0 b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA tlireshold'determination;'or d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? 0 If the answer to any of questions a through d is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the planned action process. • • CITY OF TUKWILA RECFs SEPA Department of Community Development Aix, 0 CANNED 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 ,2 200/ ® Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431- 366.bcpMMU ACTION E -mail: tukplan @ci. tkwila. wa. us LoPME T APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: SWIFT LLC LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 3600 S. 124th Street, Tukwila, WA TAX CODE: 7345600055 Quarter: Southwest Section: 10 Township: 23 North Range: 4 East (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E -mail: Douglas Gardner 12201 Tukwila Intl. Blvd., 4th Floor, Seattle, WA 98168 206.730.4974 cell FAX: 206.329..,0062' Signature: doug: @sabe .com G:IAPPHANILANDUSE.APPIsplan.doc, 09/11/03 FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT /;" 0 I Planner: File Number: Application Complete: (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete: (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: SWIFT LLC LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. 3600 S. 124th Street, Tukwila, WA TAX CODE: 7345600055 Quarter: Southwest Section: 10 Township: 23 North Range: 4 East (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E -mail: Douglas Gardner 12201 Tukwila Intl. Blvd., 4th Floor, Seattle, WA 98168 206.730.4974 cell FAX: 206.329..,0062' Signature: doug: @sabe .com G:IAPPHANILANDUSE.APPIsplan.doc, 09/11/03 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items submitted with application .Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and. Planning APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. ./' 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist and Planned Action Criteria Checklist. / 3. One complete set of 8 1/2" by 11" PMTs of any drawings submitted with the Planned Action. 4. Application Fee $250. ,g/ 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA Review. 9 ,5- .43 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: / 6. Vicinity Map with site location. A1/4- 7. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). 4// Pw#) opvi;�/ %2 8. Provide four (4) copies of any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36". RECEIVE® AUG 0 2 2005' ggMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and/or accessory use located within the MIC/L (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. l/a.S. — �x s+-r,w4 Use. 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. \MPb - Sem CeYrl vzLErre f'wc r44fi 3. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? Nees 4. Is the proposal any of the following: a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200,or TMC 18.06.270; b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; ,.. 13O c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold-determination; or d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? i0 o If the answer to any of questions a through d is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the planned action process. Date: CITE OF','TUKVVILA ' NDANGERED SPECIES ACT SCREENING.CHECKLIST... IVED Applicant Name: �„i7"�✓;�� �,,,•� �(r�ft,,i�. EE,s74 �LG 'AUG 0 2 2005 Street Address: 3‘00 S . 1 Y7' ,c74-,S--, DE1/ELOPMi City, State, Zip: UKw / " Al i.cfWer Telephone: D‘.— 730 ryi 7 G/ •C/ fL �'f� �r�.• -v/!�r Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential . "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas . studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. 4 Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 YES Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 Part A (continued) 6-0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. if your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 @--;) Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 1-4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 • Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each A/o question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to G�,i„i.5 Jconstruction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled ,,4 ✓� y� maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. /16/ 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200'feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2-4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each k question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, /e O( construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled N 5 maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. iou 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 4-0 Remediation Plan Former Swift Transportation Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Prepared for: Sabey Corporation RECEW m EP 'AUG 0 2 2005 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Draft: June 24, 2005 Remediation Plan Former Swift Transportation Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA DRAFT: 6 -24 -05 INTRODUCTION This plan presents a suggested remedial approach to cleanup petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel and heavy -oil range hydrocarbons) in soil at the former Swift Transportation site located at 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, Washington (Figure 1). The final approach should include input from the selected remedial contractor. An environmental site assessment prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (DOF) for Sabey Corporation discovered that releases of petroleum hydrocarbons had occurred in three areas of the site (Figure 3) including: • Waste Oil Area — located on the south side of the shop building where a 2,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST) containing waste oil was removed in 1995. • Gas/Diesel Area — located on the north side of the shop building where a diesel (10,000 gallon) and gasoline /diesel (4,000/5,000 gallon) USTs were removed in 1995. • P -18 Area — located approximately 140 feet north of the shop building just south of the concrete apron next to the terminal building. The source of the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination is not known. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The project site is located on the west side of the Duwamish Valley, approximately one half mile from the Duwamish River (Figure 1). Shallow soils in the valley include fills, alluvial (river) deposits and peat. Geologic logs of soil probes and monitoring wells indicate that approximately 4.5 feet to 14 feet of fill overlies peat deposits beneath the site. The fill deposits are variable in nature. On the western portion of the site the fills generally consist of brown, very silty to silty fine to coarse sand with some gravel. At some locations the sand is mixed with clayey silt. On the eastern portion of the site, the fills appear to generally consist of variable mixtures of brown to gray, fine to coarse sandy, clayey silt and gravelly fine to coarse sand. Wood, brick and concrete fragments were encountered in several explorations. During the UST removals (by others) in November 1995, excavation water levels were reported to be approximately five feet below existing grade. In March 2003, water levels were reported to be range between one and three feet below ground surface in monitoring Dalton, Olmsted & Fugleva Inc. nd Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 3 Draft: June 24, 2005 wells. In February 2005, during DOF site explorations, water levels ranged between approximately 1.4 feet (GW -3) to 4.1 feet (MW -5). CLEANUP LEVELS (CULs) In Washington State, soil cleanup levels (CULs) are contained in the Model Toxics Control Act or MTCA (Chapter 173- 340 -WAC). Method A CULs for petroleum hydrocarbons are listed below: Table 1 - Petroleum Hydrocarbon CULs Diesel Range Organics 2,000 mg/kg Heavy -Oil Range Organics 2,000 mg/kg Gasoline -Range Organics w/o benzene, and toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene less than 1% of mixture. 100 mg/kg Other Gasoline Mixtures 30 mg/kg Benzene 0.03 mg/kg Toluene 7 mg/kg Ethylbenzene 6 mg/kg Xylene 9 mg/kg Diesel and Heavy -Oil Range Organics. The cleanup level (Method A) for diesel and heavy -oil range hydrocarbons is 2,000 mg/kg (Table740-1 — 173- 340 -900 WAC). The CUL is applied on an individual or combined basis. cnv - S tc Assess mewr Gasoline Range Organics. When the ESA was completed, the available historical information indicated that the USTs contained diesel or waste oil. After the sampling was completed, it was discovered that UST No. 3, formerly located near the northeast corner of the shop building, may also have contained gasoline. Hydrocarbon identification analyses completed for probe soil samples in the UST No. 3 area did not detect gasoline range hydrocarbons, however, cleanup levels for gasoline range hydrocarbons are listed above in case they are detected during the remedial work. DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL AREAS AND POSSIBLE SOIL VOLUMES The following section describes the three remedial areas. Probe /monitoring well locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3. Soil quality data is summarized in attached Table 2. Probe and well logs are presented in Attachment A. The locations where soil analyses exceeded CULs are shown on Figure 3. Geologic sections illustrating the subsurface conditions are shown on Figures 4 to 6. Section locations are shown on Figure 3. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevan , nc. Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 4 Draft: June 24, 2005 Waste Oil Area. This area is located south of the shop building at the location of a former waste oil UST (Figure 3). A soil sample obtained from a depth of 9 feet in the former UST excavation had a TPH concentration of 8,800 mg/kg (P -12), see Figure 4. A sidewall (south wall) sample collected in 1995 from a depth of 4 feet had a TPH concentration of 5,200 mg/kg. At probe P -11, located approximately 25 feet south of the UST excavation had a TPH concentration of 7,610 mg/kg. A portion of the waste oil area is located beneath the southwest corner of the shop building where free product was detected in the past in monitoring well GW -4. Probe P -12 in the former UST excavation encountered fill soils described as brown to gray, silty to slightly silty fine to coarse sand with gravel to a depth of 11 feet. Probe P- 11 encountered fill soils consisting of brown to gray, clayey silt mixed with silty, fine to coarse sand. Soils were wet below a depth of 1 foot and a petroleum odor was detected below a depth of approximately 4 feet. A water level of 1.6 feet below ground surface was measured in monitoring well MW -6 on February 28, 2005. The extent of soil that exceeds CULs in this area can only be approximated with the available data. For estimating purposes, it was assumed that CULs were exceeded in an area 90 feet long by 45 feet wide (Figure 3) and that excavation would need to be completed to depths of between 5 feet and 9 feet. Using these assumptions, soil volumes of between 650 cubic yards (cy) and 1,400 cy would need to be removed from the site. Gas/Diesel Area. This area is located on the northeast side of the shop building near the former location of a UST that contained diesel and perhaps gasoline (Figure 3). Itisalso- located below a fuel pump and the former location of an above ground fuel tank. A soil sample from a depth of 2 feet at P -15 had a TPH concentration of 7,300 mg/kg, see Figure 5. A sidewall sample (east wall) collected in 1995 from a depth of 5 feet had a TPH concentration of 2,000 mg/kg. Samples obtained from probes P -19 and P -21 located to the east had TPH concentrations of between 4,600 mg/kg to 5,400 mg/kg from depths of 6 feet to 8 feet. The probes encountered fill soils described as a brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy, clayey silt and gravelly fine to coarse sand with brick fragments. They were wet below a depth of about 3 feet. A water level of 4.1 feet was measured in monitoring well MW -5 on February 28, 2005. The extent of soil that exceeds CULs in this area can only be approximated with the available data. For estimating purposes, it was assumed that CULs were exceeded in an area 130 feet long by 70 feet wide (Figure 3) and that excavation would need to be completed to depths of between 6 feet and 9 feet. Using these assumptions, soil volumes of between 1,000 cubic yards (cy) and 3,000 cy would need to be removed from the site. Area P -18. Area P -18 is located just south of the concrete apron on the south side of the Terminal Building. Analysis of a soil sample obtained from a depth of 1 to 2 feet had a Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 5 Draft: June 24, 2005 diesel range organic concentration of 1,400 mg/kg and a heavy -oil range organic concentration of 9,100 mg/kg (combined TPH concentration of 10,500 mg/kg), see Figure 6. A soil sample obtained from a depth of 8 to 9 feet had a TPH concentration of 1,250 mg/kg (below CULs). The P -18 soil probe encountered a brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy, clayey silt and gravelly fine to coarse sand to a depth of approximately 9 feet. Brown, granular peat was encountered below 9 feet. The soils were wet below a depth of 3 feet. Petroleum odors were observed. The horizontal and vertical extent of soil that exceeds CULs cannot be determined with the available data. For estimating purposes, it was assumed that CULs were exceeded in an area 80 feet long by 50 feet wide (Figure 3) and that excavation would need to be completed to depths of between 3 feet and 6 feet. Using these assumptions, soil volumes of between 450 cubic yards (cy) and 900 cy would need to be removed from the site. SUGGESTED APPROACH TO SOIL REMEDIATION The following sections describe a possible approach to site remediation. However, the final appro s ould be at the discretion of the selected contractor with the approval of Sabey a DOF. p o c k t e v . of v s +,at l= u5leuai' 4 Health and Safety Plan. Prior to the start of the remediation, the contractor should prepare and submit to Sabey a health and safety plan that will be followed as part of the remedial work. The contractor should certify that the workers on the site have had the appropriate health and safety training. Demolition. Prior to the start of excavation, the shop building and floor slab will be demolished and removed from the site. The building and floor slab are pile supported and remedial excavation within the building footprint will likely require some excavation between piles. Locate Utilities. Prior to excavation, utilities should be located by the contractor and provision made to protect or abandon any buried utility lines, pipes, etc. Excavation. The general remediation areas should be marked in the field and paving removed from the targeted remedial areas. Excavation should proceed outward from the probe locations. Observations will be made of the soils removed from the excavation for indications of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination (odor, soil color, sheens). Soil samples will be periodically obtained for laboratory analysis from excavation sidewalls and bottom to further guide the extent of excavation. If appropriate, these samples will be analyzed on a rapid turn-a -round basis. • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 6 Draft: June 24, 2005 Obviously contaminated soils should be directly loaded into trucks for disposal or into a lined stockpile. If uncontaminated soils are encountered that would be suitable for use as backfill, these soils should be placed in a separate lined stockpile. Any stockpile soils will need to be covered at the end of a work day. The contractor should work with geologists fro DOF w'th respect to determining the extent of excavation and sampling. Some delay - • =en excavation and backfilling may occur because of laboratory turn- around. Any disruption in work flow will be minimized with close coordination between the contractor and consultant. Handling of Water and Free Product. It is anticipated that ground water will be encountered in the excavations. Any separate phase product that enters the excavation should be removed using a Vac Truck or other suitable means. Contaminated ground water should be pumped to a temporary storage tank for treatment and/or proper disposal. Excavation should be staged to minimize the amount of water that needs to be pumped from the excavation and disposed off -site. This might be accomplished by excavating portions of remedial areas and backfilling the excavations in a timely manner. The contractor should provide an approach to deal with this issue. Disposal of Contaminated Materials. Contaminated soil and water will need to be disposed off -site. Soil could be transported to TPS in Tacoma for thermal treatment or to a municipal landfill. The contractor should provide a unit cost for each of these alternatives. Contaminated ground water will need to be transported off -site to a treatment facility. The treatment facility and unit cost of disposal should be identified by the contractor. The contractor should provide Sabey with trip tickets, manifests and/or disposal certificates. These will be included with the remedial report that is submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology. Backfilling. In the event that clean on -site soils cannot be used for backfill, a clean pit - run sand and gravel should be used. The backfill should be placed in specified lifts (likely 2 -foot or less), compacted to a density specified by the geotechnical engineer. An alternate to compacted backfill would be to use crushed rock that could be placed without compaction. This would allow rapid backfilling to minimize ground water issues related to the backfill process. Some residual petroleum hydrocarbons will likely remain in soil and ground water after work described in this remedial plan is completed. Petroleum hydrocarbons degrade readily under aerobic conditions. Oxygen release compound (ORC) is a substance that can be added to backfill that will be placed below the water table to promote aerobic Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 7 Draft: June 24, 2005 conditions and degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. This alternative is currently being evaluated. Reporting. After the remedial excavation work is completed, a remedial report will be prepared and submitted to Ecology. It is anticipated that Sabey will request a No Further Action designation for the site as part of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). This report will serve to support this request. RECOMMENDATION FOR ADDITIONAL TESTING It is recommended that approximately seven test pits be excavated at the locations shown on Figure 7 to further define the extent inated soils. The test pits should be observed and logged by a geologist f DOF. possible, a representative of the selected contractor should be present during t - •vation to directly observe the soil conditions. The purpose of the test pits is as follows: • Provide information on sidewall stability and rate of ground water inflow; • Provide a means to collect soil samples for chemical analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons. Approximately 3 samples would be analyzed from each pit in an attempt to delineate the pattern of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in each of the remedial areas. Depending on the results, the sample analyses will be used as part of the confirmation soil analyses. These data would be used to refine the remedial plan. ATTACHMENTS Table 2 — Summary of Soil Quality Data Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Detail — Maintenance Building Area Figure 3 — Locations that Exceed Petroleum Hydrocarbon Cleanup Level in Soil Figure 4 — Section A -A' and B -B' Figure 5 — Section A -A' and C -C' Figure 6 — Section A -A' and D -D' Figure 7 — Proposed Test Pit Locations Attachment A — Probe and Well Logs Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Former Swift Transportation Site Page 8 Draft: June 24, 2005 TABLE 2 - Summary of Soil Quality Data Swift Trucking Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Location Spl. Depth (feet) Petroleum Hydrocarbons PCB Aroclors Total Metals Diesel Motor Oil HC -ID 1016 1242 1248 1254 1260 1221 1232 PCBs Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Zinc (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (ug/kg) (ug /kg) (ug/kg) ( ug/kg) (ug/kg) ( ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (mg/kg) -- (mg/kg) - -- (mg/kg) ---- ( mg/kg)_ ----- (mg/kg) - -- (mg/kg) T 1 S W 4.5 <25 <50 - -- -- --- - -- - - - T1EW 4.5 55 <50 - - -- -- -- ----- - -- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- - -- - --- T23SW 5 2000 <50 - -- -- -- - -- - -- - -- - - ----- -- -- -- - - -- T4SW 4 3400 1800 -- -- - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - -- - - -- PW1 2 -3 5.7 18 DRO /RRO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <5 <0.2 21.6 2 <0.04 31.7 P2 9 9.3 73 DRO /MO <36 ' <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <6 <0.2 28.4 <2 <0.05 32.8 PW3 8 -10 51 300 DIESEUMO <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 5 <0.2 33.1 3 <0.05 34 PW4 0.5 -1 27 300 DRO /MO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 . <5 <0.2 30.5 3 <0.05 44.2 PW5 7 -8 <54 480 - <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <6 <0.2 37.2. 18 <0.06 42.6 P7 5 <5.5 25 RRO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <5 <0.2 26.8 2 <0.05 36.6 P9 6 <6.2 22 RRO <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <6 <0.2 31.4 2 <0.05 32.3 P11 4 510 7100 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <6 <0.2 26.2 18 <0.05 45.8 P12 8 -10 7000 1800 DIESEUMO <38 <38 <38 130 <38 <38 <38 130 <6 <0.2 15.4 4 <0.06 43.1 P13 1 -3 96 860 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <10 <0.5 20 14 <0.05 249 P14 5 -6 85 440 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 310 <41 <41 <41 310 <6 <0.2 22.1 7 0.04 38.2 P15 1 -2 7100 250 DIESEURR <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <6 <0.3 25 11 <0.05 38.5 P15 10 -11 72 130 DRO /RRO <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <10 <0.5 24 9 <0.05 57 P16 7 -9 710 980 DIESEUMO <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <6 <0.2 17.1 8 <0.06 48.7 P17 2 -4 15 130 DRO /RRO <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 11 <0.3 17.9 11 <0.07 29.1 P18 1 -2 1400 9100 DRO /MO <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <6 <0.2 28.5 3 <0.04 33.9 P18 8 -9 250 1000 DRO /MO <60 <60 <60 <120 450 <60 <60 450 <6 <0.2 17.1 9 <0.06 39.3 P19 7 -9 3600 1000 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <6 <0.2 54.6 11 <0.05 34.5 P20 6 -7 28 90 DRO /MO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 8 <0.2 15.3 7 <0.05 51.2 P21 5 -7 500 4900 DRO /MO <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 30 1.2 630 ' 166 <0.04 251 PW22 4 -6 210 33 DIESEUMO <41 99 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 99 <6 <0.2 32.6 12 <0.06 62.8 P23 8 -10 36 300 DRO /MO <42 <42 <42 56 42 <42 <42 98 <6 <0.3 28.1 24 <0.05 54.3 PW24 4 -6 52 300 DRO /MO <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 7 0.7 23.7 91 0.08 109 P25 4 -6 18 120 DRO /MO <39 <39 <39 47 <39 <39 <39 47 <6 <0.2 22.3 8 <0.05 45.5 P26 3-4 14 86 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <6 <0.2 25.5 14 <0.05 78.1 P27 4 -6 10 31 DRO /RRO <41 <41 <41 98 56 <41 <41 154 7 <0.2 27.3 5 <0.05 44.4 PW28 3-4 140 1200 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <5 <0.2 26.9 16 <0.05 51.3 Cleanup Level 2000 2000 - - -- na na na na na na na 1000 20 2 2000(a) 250 2 24000 Method A A - -- -- -- - -- - -- A A A A A A B Background - - -- - -- - - - -- ----- - - - 20 1 48 24 0.07 85 Notes: Diesel quantificaiton ange C12 to C24 Motor Oil quantification range C24 to C38. DRO /RRO indicates results of analyses or additional hydrocarbons in samples are not identifiable. (a) as Chromium III Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 1 (PH 2 ESA Soil Quality Tbl 2.xls- Sheetl ) •' • :t iairr.�r. •7. 6 .0., TOPO! map printed on 03/21 /05 from "BaseMap Swift.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg" 122 °22.000' W 122 °20.000' W 122 °18.000' W 122 °16.000' W 122 °14.000' W WGS84122 °10.000' W ©elate, • 1/11!,;11 a 1t•gAd•F2i1 1! r e, sit tT� ?aBdHI -�f It1I'Itlildf Atli wtetu� ®It ete311e0cI 1.. Itttttc7silU:e<Piki 81BSAi1a aAM,'lP ti are ^t1 rlatvtuulrv!; iep II rt1116B�XiI1 t1I is� e�,i'LeAi'armeee'i I u rUl A ,. _ - via°rl.nxxx.mn°a.� °e- ;mn..eo. �, �� �j4 ;t >I •.Sy{ �r111A �j'�;� "m!;•:C ,�:!C 1 ®i�•S ,1151 in11111 .: •s�t.i j1�'i'i?.t P!Fil� ' Cy�L .iV—lNa. ry !MID 1:7/11, q Pa qg ave a�f'�/'' Rt9cwe,< 4airkw tvisi. ,\ ell. 0l1° I 1'��a 122 °22.000' W TN hilt I0• Ref: VicMap Swiff.cdr 122 °20.000' W 122 °18.000' W 122 °16.000' W 122 °14.000' W 0.0 05 10 13 20 25 30 3.5 mles 0 1 2 3 4 5 k Printed from TOPO! 02000 National Geoe,phic Hoklfr (wwn.topo coin) WGS84122 °10.000' W S�I7GIIifII M;K4D7LY. Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Vicinity Map SAB -024 FIGURE 1 Mar. 2005 Dalton, Olmsted 8c Fuglcvancl, Inc. P -7 ® P -8 GW -3 UST #1 P -9 e Exist Waste Oil AST O Quest Soil SpI. (1996) & GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well O MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well P Probe Location PW Probe Location with Ground - Water Sample Attempt 30 P -10 UST #2 T1 SW e P -17 �T1EW 1 Area of Tank Excavation UST #3 Prev. 4,000/5000 gal Gasoline/Diesel UST P -16 Prev. 10,000 girl [Diesel UST GW -1 T23SW Lube Room P -14 P -15 Sand -Oil Sump Sump and C.0 To San. Sewer f Sump (to San. S - wer) .0 o - - -A r— Grouted and ndoned Waste 01 S ps and line i to waste Oil T GW-4 H Sump (to San. ewer) i.000/3,000 / —Previous UST # w P -12 gallon waste O0 UST � US 44 GW -2 T4SW P -11 E? S MW-6 P -13 Area of Tank Excavation Exist Scale House Exist Scale Pit P -19 Exist Dispense m rn 0 of orn oQ t in' ■ m TA W 0 30 60 Scale in Feet (approximate) Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: SAB -024 probe well site map det.cdr Site Plan Detail Maintenance Building Area SAB -024 FIGURE 2 Mar. 2005 1.)ulton. (.)Irnst:it Fualcr;1nd. Inc. 35th Ave. S. Terminal Building OW-4 Asphalt D Concrete apron P -18 1050012) P -17 PW -24 P -23.:. Asphalt PW -22 -do's `, P -19 •- - - -. 4600 @8'Y 4 P -21 (5400 @•k: O UST Excavation Spl. (1996) • GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well ▪ MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well • P Probe Location • PW Probe Location with Ground -Water Sample Attempt . Man (Wti le Analyses Below See Table 1 for Results Depth Sample Analyses Exceed CUL Concentration (mg /kg) and (5400@6') Depth (feet) A A' Section Locations P -12 , PW-1 (8800@9') P -25 Asprd* \ MW-5I O B' \ Unpaved Gas.)Diesel ; P -27 P -20 Area South 124th St. A 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: REM SAB -024 Soil TPH b.cdr MW -6 Based on free product being observed during the drilling of the well in 1996. -26 PW -28 Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Locations That Exceed Petroleum Hydrocarbon Cleanup Level in Soil SAB -024 FIGURE 3 June 2005 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevund. inc. Relative Elevation in Feet 100 95 90 85 80 Waste 011 Area Gas Diesel Area AFence Section B-B' Shop Building Section C -C' MW -6/P11 GW -21P12 GW -4 P -14 P -15 P 16 P -18 Area Section D -D' A P -17 P -18 3 x 7610 x 5200 Relative Elevation in Feet 100 Ref: Section A,cdr 95 90 85 80 B 1 7350x V ' Gray, silty, clayey 1 sand w/ wood, o 525 x.. gravel and s chunks of clayey silt x 8800 1 202 x r GW-1 1x 2000 x 1690 1 Brown, granular to fibrous peat Former UST 145 x Former UST Excavation Mature of sandy, clayey silt and gravelly sand (fill) x 10500 x 1250 Excavation P1 Waste Oil Area Section A -A' .1 P10 GW -2/P12 P13 B' P -20 x 24 Brown, granular to fibrous peat Silty sand w/ gravel a s 1 1 1 x 8800 Br. silty sand w/ gravel over clayey silt w/ gravel 118 x Soil Monitor) Probe Well 3 Water Level - 2 -28 -05 P1 MW-6 Water Level During Tank Removals - 11 -95 x 7610 TPH Conc. (mg/kg) Former UST Excavation irtats 0 50 Scale in Feet (approximate) Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Sections A -A' and B -B' SAB -024 FIGURE 4 June 2005 Dolton, Olmsted & Fugtevond. lnc. Relative Elevation in Feet 100 95 90 85 80 Relative Elevation in Feet Waste .Oil Area Gas Diesel Area A Fence Section B-B' Shop Building Section C -C' MW -6/P11 GW -21P12 GW -4 P -14 P -15 P16 P48 Area Section D -D' 4� P -17 P -18 x 7610 100 95 90 85 80 C x 5200 s x 881:11 Former UST 7350x Gray, silty, clayey sand w/ wood, 525K- gravel rind chunks of clayey silt r IGW -1 jx 2000 4 x 1690 145 x Mixture of sandy, clayey silt and gravelly sand (fit) x 10500 x 1250 202x..4 Brown, granular to fibrous peat Former UST Excavation Excavation Gas /Diesel Area Section A -A' P7 C i P_9 P 16 p- 5 P -19 P -21 MW -5 Silty sand w/ x 25 gravel (fill)) 7350 x 3 G•1 x <50 x 1690 ..202 x . x 2000 Mixture of sandy, clayey silt and gr.W..Jl)y..Sand w/ blrck frogs. (fill) x 4600 Brown, granular to fibrous peat Former UST Excavation Soil Monitor Probe Well P1 MW-6 Ref: Section C.cdr 3 Water Level - 2 -28 -05 • Water Level During Tank - Removals - 11 -95 x 7610 TPH Conc. (mg/kg) 0 50 Scale in Feet (approximate) x 5400 Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Sections A -A' and C -C' SAB -024 FIGURE 5 June 2005 Dolton. Olmsted & Fuglevund. Inc. Relative Elevation in Feet 1 00— 95 90 85 80 Waste Oil Area Gas Diesel Area A Fence Section B-B' Shop Building Section C -C' MW -6/P11 GW -2/P12 GW -4 P -14 P -15 P 16 P -18 Area Section D -D' A P -17 P -18 x 7610 Relative Elevation in Feet Ref: Section D.cdr D 100 95 x 5200 3: y x8500 ..1 3 7350 x Gray, silty, clayey sand w/ wood, 525 x. • •gravel and chunks of clayey silt Former UST 202.x r 16W-1 jx 2000 Brown, granular to fibrous peat 1690 145 x Mixture of sandy, clayey silt and gravelly sand (MO Former UST Excavation x 10500 x 1250 Excavation P -6 P -18 Area Section A-A' y P -18 D' P -23 90— 85 80— Silty sand w/ gravel, mixed w/ clayey slit (fill)) Wet below x 10500 3 feet x 1250 Mixture of sandy, clayey silt and gravelly sand w/ birck frags. (fill) x 336 Brown, granular to fibrous peat Soil Probe P1 Monitor Well MW-6 3 x 7610 Water Level - 2 -28 -05 Water Level During Tank Removals - 11 -95 TPH Conc. (mg/kg) 0 50 Scale in Feet (approximate) Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Sections A -A' and D -D' SAB -024 FIGURE 6 June 2005 Dulton, Olmsted & Fuglevund, Inc. • 35th Ave. S. OW-4 Asphalt PW -3 P -2 OMW-7 Asphalt PW -5 GP -6 Terminal Building Concrete apron Jilt Tk \I ';tiJ \I = -rlv aa��� - -- p_7 sGW -3 P -17 T1W T15 W p= t.: P-LIPM P -9 P-8 ® (735 P-15 ) P- P-12 ; PW -1 (8800@97 P- Wmte Oil Areb P -11 I (7610@ 7 PW -24 P -23 Asphalt P▪ W -22 ler P -21 ('���' )/ 6 South 124th St. 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: REM SAB -024 Soil TPH d.cdr :T4SW '5200 @4) MW -6 ❑ UST Excavation Spl. (1996) © GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well • MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well • P Probe Location e PW Probe Location with Ground -Water Sample Attempt (5400@67 Sample Analyses Below CUL - See Table 1 for Results and Depth Sample Analyses Exceed CUL Concentration (mg /kg) and Depth (feet) Proposed Test Pit Location Asphttf "MW -5 • Unpaved Gas.Jpiesel op .27 P -zo Areal OP-25 OP-26 w -28 Based on free product being observed during the drilling of the well in 1996. Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Proposed Test Pit Locations SAB -024 FIGURE 7 June 2005 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevand. Inc. ATTACHMENT A PROBE AND WELL LOGS TABLE C1 - Probe Logs • Swift Trucking Property 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, Washington Probe No. Location and Date Accomplished Depth(ft) Materials (ft) Lab Samples (soil) PW1 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 8 0-4.5 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, very silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 3' 4.5 -8 Brown, fibrous PEAT 2 -3' Unable to Sample Water - Insufficient recovery P2 SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -9.5 4 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, very silty to slightly silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 2' 9.5 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 9 PW3 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 12 0 -11 4 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, very silty to slightly silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 3' 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 8 -10' Unable to Sample Water - Insufficient recovery PW4 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 12 0 -7 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 4' 7 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 0.5 -1' Unable to Sample Water - Insufficient recovery PW5 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 12 0 -11 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 3' 11 -12 Brown, fibrous PEAT 7 -8' unable to Sample Water - Insufficient recovery P6 SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -11 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel mixed with clayey SILT (FILL) Moist 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT "gas (poss. methane) bubbling though bentonite hydration water" No Lab P7 SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -9.5 3 "Asphalt over gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Moist 9.5 -12 Brown, granular to fibrous PEAT "gas (poss. methane) bubbling though bentonite hydration water" 5' Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 5 (PH 2 ESA SAB -024 problogs.xls - Sheets ) TABLE C1 - Probe Logs Swift Trucking Property 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, Washington Probe No. Location and Date Accomplished Depth(ft) Materials (ft) Lab Samples (soil) P8 SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -12 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel mixed with clayey SILT (FILL) Wet below 0.5' Hole sloughing could not advance below 12 feet No Lab P9 SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -10 3 "Asphalt over gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 4' 10 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 6' P1O SEE PLAN 2/16/2005 12 0 -12 3 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 2' Hole sloughing could not advance below 12 feet and could not discern if peat was encountered No Lab P11 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -9 2 "Asphalt over dark brown to gray, clayey silt mixed with silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Moist 9- 12 Brown, fibrous PEAT 4' P12 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -11 3 "Asphalt over brown to gray, silty to slightly silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) Wet below 1' with petroleum odor below 4' 11 -12 Brown, granular to fibrous PEAT 8 -10' P13 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -2.5 3 "Asphalt over brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel (FILL) 2.5- 9.5' Gray, sandy, clayey SILT with gravel (FILL) Wet below 8' 9.5- 12 Brown, granular to fibrous PEAT 1 -3' Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 2 of 5 (PH 2 ESA SAB -024 problogs.xls- Sheetl ) TABLE C1 - Probe Logs Swift Trucking Property 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, Washington Probe No. Location and Date Accomplished Depth(ft) Materials (ft) Lab Samples (soil) P14 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 (S. End of Maint Bldg Interior) 12 0 -1.5 7" Concrete over light gray, fine SAND 1.5- 11 Gray, silt, clayey fine to coarse SAND with wood fragments, gravel, and chucks of clayey SILT (FILL) damp 11 -12 Brown, granular to fibrous PEAT 5 -6' P15 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 (N. End of Maint Bldg Interior) 12 0 -2 7" Concrete over wet brown, fine SAND with petroleum odor 7 -11.5 Gray, mixed, clayey SILT and silty to slightly silty fine to coarse SAND (FILL) with slight petoleum odor 11.5 -12 Brown, granular to fibrous PEAT 1 -2' 10 -11' P -16 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -11 3 "Asphalt over gray, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and possible rubble (FILL) Petroleum odor below 4 feet. Wet below 4' 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 7 -9' P17 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -12 3 "Asphalt over brown to gray, mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 2-4' 5 -7' P18 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -9 3" Asphalt over dark brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' Petroleum odor observed 9 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 8 -9' P19 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -11 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' Petroleum odor observed 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 7 -9' Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 3 of 5 (PH 2 ESA SAB -024 problogs.xls- Sheetl ) TABLE C1 - Probe Logs Swift Trucking Property 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, Washington Probe No. Location and Date Accomplished Depth(ft) Materials (ft) Lab Samples (soil) P20 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 8 0 -7.5 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 7.5 -8 Brown, granular PEAT 6 -7' P21 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -11.5 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND with brick fragments (FILL) Wet below 3' 11.5 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 5 -7' PW -22 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 12 0 -11 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 4 -6' (Water Sample taken) P23 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -10 2" Asphalt over brown to gray gravelly silty to very silty fine to coarse SAND with peat mixed from 2 to 6' (FILL) Wet below 2' 10 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 8 -10 PW -24 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 8 0 -11 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 11 -12 Brown, granular PEAT 4 -6' (Water Sample taken) P25 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 8 0 -9 Gray, gravelly, silty fine to coarse SAND with clayey silt chunks, decomposed concrete. Peaty zone from 2 to 3.5' (FILL) Wet below 3' Refusal of probe at 9' (two attempts) on possible concrete rubble 4 -6 P26 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -6.5 Brown to gray, gravelly, silty fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 6.5 -12 Peaty soil grading to PEAT with wood 3 -4' Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 4 of 5 (PH 2 ESA SAB -024 problogs.xls- Sheetl ) TABLE C1 - Probe Logs Swift Trucking Property 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, Washington Probe No. Location and Date Accomplished Depth(ft) Materials (ft) Lab Samples (soil) P27 SEE PLAN 2/17/2005 12 0 -10 Brown to gray mixture of very silty gravelly, fine to coarse SAND with concrete fragments (FILL) Wet below 3' 10- 12 Brown PEAT (interpreted based on ease of penetration - no recovery - concrete chunk blocked sampler at 10 feet) 4 -6' PW -28 SEE PLAN 2/18/2005 12 0 -9 3" Asphalt over brown to gray mixture of fine to coarse sandy clayey SILT and gravelly fine to coarse SAND (FILL) Wet below 3' 9 -12 Brown, fibrous PEAT 3-4' (Water Sample taken) Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 5 of 5 (PH 2 ESA SAB -024 problogs.xls - Sheetl) • Dalton, Olmsted & Futlevand, Inc. Enuironmental Consultants MONITORING WELL NO. MW -5 - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES, TESTS, AND INSTALLATION • Field Rep: T. Olmsted Location: 388 ft. E of W. Fence line and 81 ft. N of S. Fenceline Drilling Co.: Cascade Drilling Elevation: 99.47 Ft (assumed ref. elevation) Driller: Andy Date Completed: 02/21/2005 Drill Type: Mobile B61 Weather: cold and clear Size/Type Casing: 4" I.D. Hollow -Stem Auger SpI.No. Type Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Blows/ 6 inches Spl length Time/Sheen Test Sample Description 1 DM 300# ham. Med. Rough 2.5 - 4 3 -2 -7 18" 305 /no sheen /no od Gray, fine to medium sandy, clayey SILT - damp (FILL) 2 DM 300# ham. Med. Rough 5 - 6.5 11-6 -6 18" 310 /no sheen /no od Gray, wet, fine to coarse, very silty SAND with gravel (FILL) 3 DM 300# ham. Smooth & Easy 7.5 - 9 1 -1 -1 18" 315/no sheen /no od Gray, wet, fine to coarse, very silty SAND with gravel (FiLL) 4 DM 300# ham. Smooth & Easy 10 -11.5 1 -2 -4 18" 320 /no sheen /no od Gray, wet, fine to coarse, very silty SAND with gravel (FiLL) 5 DM 300# ham. Smooth & Easy 1.5 -15 8 -7 -4 (pushing 8" 322/no sheen /no od Top: Same Bittom 6" Brown, granular PEAT Depth(ft.) 0 14 15 SUMMARY LOG 2" Asphalt Pavement Gray, fine to medium sandy clayey SILT with gravelly zones (FILL) Gray, wet, very silty, fine to coarse SAND with Gravel (FILL) Brown, granular PEAT Bottom at 15 feet. NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM 0 Monument Cover 1 _ =_..'- . = Concrete Bentonite 15 5 Screen 15 Sandpack MONITORING WELL INFORMATION Riser Length: 5 feet Sandpack: 2 -12 Sand (top/bot)3 /15 Screen: 2" PVC /0.010" slot length: 10 feet (top /bot) 5/15 Seal: Bentonite /Concrete (top/bot) 0/3 Monument: Cast Iron - flush Figure C1 • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fualevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants MONITORING WELL NO. MW -6 - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES, TESTS, AND INSTALLATION • Field Rep: T. Olmsted Drilling Co.: Cascade Drilling Driller: Andy Drill Type: Mobile 861 Size/Type Casing: 4" I.D. Hollow -Stem Auger Spl.No. Type Drill Action Location: 229 ft. E of W. Fence line and 7 ft. N of S. Fenceline Elevation: 97.70 Ft (assumed ref. elevation) Date Completed: 02/21/2005 Weather: cold and clear Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Blows/ 6 inches Spl length Time /Sheen Test Sample Description No Samples Taken, Log based on p obe P -11 located 5 ft west Depth(ft.) IMMARY LOG (based on P11 5' we 0 4 12 2" Asphalt Pavement Brown to gray, fine to coarse sandy SILT and gray, fine sandy SILT with sand zones (FILL) Dark gray to gray, very silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel - moist (FILL) Brown, fibrous PEAT NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM 0 Monument Cover 1 Concrete Bentonite 3 15 =sx 5 Screen 15 Sandpack MONITORING WELL INFORMATION Riser Length: 5 feet Sandpack: 2 -12 Sand (top/bot)3 /15 Screen: 2" PVC /0.010" slot length: 10 feet (top/bot) 5/15 Seal: Bentonite/Concrete (top/bot) 0/3 Monument: Cast Iron - flush Figure C2 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc• Environmental Consultants MONITORING WELL NO. MW -7 - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES, TESTS, AND INSTALLATION Field Rep: T. Olmsted Drilling Co.: Cascade Drilling Driller: Andy Drill Type: Mobile B61 Size/Type Casing: 4" I.D. Hollow -Stem Auger SpI.No. Type Drill Action Location: 60 ft. E of W. Fence line and 148 ft. N of S. Fenceline Elevation: 95.82 Ft (assumed ref. elevation) Date Completed: 02/21/2005 Weather cold and clear Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Blows/ 6 inches Spl length Time/Sheen Test Sample Description No Samples Taken, Log based on probe P -2 located 5 ft north Depth(ft.) JMMARY LOG (based on P2 5' non 0 4" Asphalt Pavement Brown to gray, silty, fine to coarse SAND with gravel and Tess silty zones 4 (FILL) 9.5 12 Gray, wet, slightly silty, fine to coarse SAND and GRAVEL (FILL) Brown, granular PEAT NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. MONITORING WELL DIAGRAM 0 Monument Cover 1 3 15 5 Screen 15 Concrete Bentonite Sandpack MONITORING WELL INFORMATION Riser Length: 5 feet Sandpack: 2 -12 Sand (top/bot)3 /15 Screen: 2" PVC /0.010" slot length: 10 feet (top/bot) 5/15 Seal: Bentonite/Concrete (top/bot) 0/3 Monument: Cast Iron - flush Figure C3 Site Specific Safety and Health Plan Soil Remediation Swift Trucking Site Prepared for: Sabey Corporation Prepared by: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. August 2006. CORRECTION RECEIVED AUG 14 2006 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS • • Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Site Specific Safety and Health Plan Soil Remediation Swift Trucking Site, Seattle, Washington Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc 1.0 Introduction The soil contaminants of concern are diesel and heavy -oil range hydrocarbons. The cleanup level for these contaminants is 2,000 mg /kg. Soils identified during the Phase 1 and 2 ESAs will be excavated by Glacier Environmental, exported to approved landfills for disposal and backfilled with clean imported soils. 1.1 Emergency Information In the event of an emergency, call for help as soon as possible. Emergency: Police 911 Fire 911 Ambulance 911 Give the following information: • Where the emergency is -, use cross streets or landmarks • Phone Number you are calling from • What Happened - type of injury • How. Many persons need help Route Map to Hospital on Following Page 1.2 Additional Emergency Information Site Name: Site Location: Hospital: Swift Trucking Site 3600 South 124th Seattle, Washington Harborview Medical Center 325 9th Avenue Seattle, WA 1 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Directions 164A END Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc Total Est. Time: 14 minutes Total Est. Distance: 9.67 miles 1: Start out going EAST on S 124TH ST toward E MARGINAL WAY S. Turn LEFT onto E MARGINAL WAY S. Turn LEFT onto INTERURBAN AVE S. INTERURBAN AVE S becomes E MARGINAL WAY S. 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 10: 11: Distance 0.1 miles 0.4 miles <0.1 miles 0.5 miles Turn RIGHT onto S BOEING ACCESS RD. 0.4 miles Merge onto I -5 N toward SEATTLE. 6.4 miles Take the DEARBORN ST. / JAMES ST. exit- EXIT 164A- toward 1.0 miles MADISON ST.. Take the JAMES ST exit. Turn RIGHT onto JAMES ST. Turn RIGHT onto 9TH AVE. End at 325 9th Ave Seattle, WA 98104 -2420, US Total Est. Time: 14 minutesTotal Est. Distance: 9.67 miles 0.2 miles 0.1 miles 0.1 miles 2 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Emergency Contacts: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand — David Cooper Sabey Corporation - Marcelo Garces National Response Center Environmental Response Chemtrec Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc (425) 827 -4588 (206) 277 -5253 (800) 424 -8802 (908) 321 -6660 (800) 424 -9300 1.3 Scope, Application and Plan Objective This health and safety plan has been developed in accordance with the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA) standards for hazardous waste operations (WAC 296 -62 -300 Part P). The purpose of this Site Health and Safety Plan is to define the requirements and designate protocols to be followed at the Site during excavation, backfilling, sampling, surveying and other site activities. Applicability extends to all contractors, subcontractors, and visitors. The level of health and safety protection will vary depending on the specific activity. The Health and Safety Plan covers each of the 11 required plan elements specific in WAC 296 -62- 30135. Table I shows the major sections where each of the elements are discussed. All personnel on site, contractors and subcontractors included, shall be informed of the site emergency response procedures and any potential fire, explosion, health, or safety hazards and protective measures planned for the site. All safety and health requirements are based on limited information known at the time of preparation, and are subject to change via formal modifications as conditions change. This health and safety plan is not intended to address all hazards or potential hazards present at the site. No warranty is included, either express or implied. Table 1 - Location of Required Health and Safety Plan Elements Regulatory Required Elements Plan Section Locations (i) Names of key personnel (ii) Safety and hazard analysis (iii) Training (iv) Personal protective equipment (v) Medical surveillance (vi) Monitoring program (vii) Site control (vii) Decontamination (ix) Emergency response plan (x) Confined space entry (xi) Spill containment 1.6 2.0 1.6.2 5.0 7.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 2.4 4.2 3 Organization Hazard Assessment Organization PPE Medical Surveillance Air Monitoring Site Control Personal Hygiene Emergency Response Physical Hazards Waste Handling Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc * Required H &S Plan elements are numbered according to their listing in WAC 296 -62- 30135. 1.4 Site Location and History The Swift Transportation property is located at 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, Washington and is approximately 4.45 acres in size. Currently the site is leased by Savannah Logistics. Previously it was leased by Swift Trucking and used as a trucking terminal. Two structures are present including a maintenance shop building and an office /warehouse (terminal) building. 1.5 Scope of Work Activities The remediation areas were identified based on an Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (DOF 2005). The contaminants of concern are petroleum hydrocarbons within the following areas illustrated on Figure 2: • Waste Oil Area — Located on the south side of the shop building where a 2,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST) containing waste oil was removed in 1995. • Gas/Diesel Area — Located on the north side of the shop building where a diesel (10,000 gallon) and a gasoline /diesel (4,000/5,000 gallon) USTs were removed in 1995. • P -18 Area — Located approximately 140 feet north of the shop building just south of the concrete apron next to the terminal building. The source of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination is not known. No additional sampling was completed in this area during the work. The overall goal of the remediation is to remove as much of the contaminated soil as practical. The estimated excavation areas are shown on Figure 2. The extent of actual excavation will depend on field observations and sampling during the remediation. 1.6 Organization The following personnel are involved in completing the activities at the site: • Project Manager — Matt Dalton Work Phone: (360) 380 -0862 Cell Phone: (206) 498 -6616 • Project Field Manager /Site Health and Safety Officer — David Cooper Work Phone: (425) 827 -4588 Cell Phone: (206) 660 -3466 2 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc 1.6.1 Project/Site Health and Safety Officer The Project/Site Health and Safety Officer has responsibility for verifying that the provisions of this plan are implemented in the field. Changing field conditions may require decisions to be made concerning adequate protection programs. The Site Health and Safety Officer is responsible for conducting site inspections on a regular basis in order to evaluate the effectiveness of this plan. 1.6.2 Site Workers/Visitors Site workers and visitors who have the potential to contact contaminated materials or be otherwise exposed to such materials during the remediation activities at the Site will be required to read and verify compliance with the provisions of this plan. The level of required health and safety procedures will depend on specific activities. In addition, all visitors will be expected to comply with relevant OSHA and WISHA requirements such as medical monitoring, training, and respiratory protection (if applicable). Site workers are required to have 40 hours of Hazardous Waste Training. Visitors will also be expected to provide their own protective equipment. In the event that a visitor does not adhere to the provisions of the plan, he /she will be requested to leave the work area. All nonconformance incidents will be recorded in the site log. 1.7 Distribution As required by WAC 296 -62- 30115, the On -site Safety Officer will make available a copy of this Health and Safety Plan to contractors and subcontractors hired by Sabey Corporation Company or Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. for on -site work. All Contractors will follow these provisions as minimum requirements. Due to their unique work activities, more stringent health and safety measures may need to be taken at their discretion. All Contractors are responsible for the health and safety of their own employees, and for meeting all requirements under applicable State, Federal, and local regulations. All site personnel will read the site specific Health and Safety Plan and sign the acknowledgment form located in the appendix. 1.8 References During development of this plan consideration was given to the following worker safety and health and environmental standards • OSHA29CFR1910.120andEPA40CFR311 • EPA, OERR ERT Standard Operating Safety Guides • NIOSH /OSHA/USCG /EPA Occupational Health and Safety Guidelines • ACGIH Threshold Limit Values • WISHAWAC 296 -62 -300, Part P 3 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc • WISHA WAC 296 -155 Construction Safety In addition, a Company Health and Safety program is on file and available. This program contains additional information on accident prevention, respiratory protection, site decontamination, hazard communication, medical monitoring, emergency planning, spill containment and confined space entry. 2.0 Hazard Evaluation and Risk Assessment There are three categories of hazards that may be encountered during the work conducted on this site. They are potential chemical exposures, fire /explosions and physical hazards. 2.1 Potential Chemical Exposures The materials onsite that may pose health risks to personnel are petroleum products (volatile organic compounds- benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. The VOC's are potential inhalation hazards, with some of the compounds having high toxicity. The metals, in the form of soil dust, may also present an inhalation hazard. Exposure to these compounds could occur during excavations and handling of samples. Engineering controls will include wetting, covering or containing excavated soil to prevent wind dispersion. Other engineering controls utilized will include "brush" fans to disperse VOC's. In the event that breathing zone monitoring indicates voc concentrations approaching the PEL (listed below) personnel will be required to wear appropriate Level C personnel protective equipment including respirators with the appropriate cartridges. (The information above refers to potential health effects from relatively significant acute and/or chronic exposures however does not imply that such effects will occur from the planned site activities.) In general, exposure to chemicals encountered at this site are not expected to result in significant health effects when work practices, engineering controls, appropriate protective equipment, and air monitoring used in accordance with the plan by properly trained individuals are followed. The toxicity and chemical properties of the potential compounds that may be detected on site are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2 provides exposure limits established by OSHA, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH). Table 3 provides target organs and possible symptoms of exposures. The exposure levels listed in Table 2 are defined below: PEL: OSHA permissible exposure limits (PELs) are 8 -hour time - weighted average (TWA) concentrations. Short -term exposure and ceiling limits are recorded where applicable. STEL: Short term exposure limit, usually 15 minutes. If this airborne level is exceeded for the specified time period, additional controls must be implemented, respiratory protection must be provided or the person leave the area. TLV: Threshold limit values (TLVs) are 8 -hour TWAs recommended and established by the ACGIH. These levels are noted where they vary from the PEL. IDLH: Immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) levels are defined by the Standards 4 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc Completion Program (SCP) only for the purpose of respirator selection. They represent the maximum concentrations from which, in the event of respirator failure, one could escape within 30 minutes without experiencing any escape- impairing or irreversible health effects. Table 2 Exposure Limits Chemical Group Chemical Name PEL TLV IDLH Volatile Organic Hydrocarbons Benzene 1 ppm 0.5 ppm (action) 5 ppm (STEL) 10 ppm 500 ppm Ethylbenzene 100 ppm 125 ppm (STEL) 800 ppm Toluene 200 ppm 150 ppm (STEL) 100 ppm 500 ppm Xylene 100 ppm 150 ppm (STEL) 900 ppm 5 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Ohnsted & Fuglevand, Inc Table 3 Exposure Routes, Target Organs and Symptoms Group Volatile Organic Compounds Substance Benzene Exposure Route Target Organs Symptoms Inhalation Ingestion Eye/Skin Contact Skin Adsorption Ethylbenzene Inhalation Ingestion Eye/Skin Contact Toluene Xylenes Inhalation Ingestion Eye/Skin Contact Inhalation Ingestion Eye/Skin Contact Skin Adsorption 6 Blood, central nervous system, skin, bone marrow, eyes, reap. system Eyes, upper resp. sys.; skin; central nervous system Central nervous system, liver, kidneys, skin Central nervous system, eyes, GI tract, blood Irritation of eyes, nose; reap. sys.; giddy; headache; nausea; staggered gait; fatigue; anorexia; dermatitis; bone marrow depression; abdominal pain (carcinogen) Irritated eyes, mucous membranes; headache; dermatitis; narcosis; coma Fatigue, weakness; confusion, euphoria, dizziness; headache, dilated pupils, lacrimation; nervousness; muscular fatigue; insomnia; paresthesia; dermatitis; photophobia Dizziness, excitement, drowsiness, incoordination, staggering gait, irritated eyes, nose Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc 2.2 Potential Exposure Routes Inhalation - This route of entry could occur if volatiles become airborne during site activities. Inhalation of contaminated dusts is also a possibility. Air monitoring and control measures specified in this plan will minimize the possibility for inhalation of site contaminants. Skin Contact - Exposure via this route could occur if contaminated soil, water or product contacts the skin or clothing. Dusts generated during soil movement may also settle on exposed skin and clothing of site workers. Protective clothing and decontamination activities specified in this plan will minimize the potential for skin contact with the contaminants. Ingestion - Exposure via this route could occur if individuals eat, drink or perform other hand - to -mouth contact in the contaminated (exclusion) zones. Decontamination procedures established in this plan will minimize the inadvertent ingestion of contaminants. 2.3 Fire and Explosion Care will be exercised at all times during field activities where flammables are known or suspected to be present. Two ABC dry chemical fire extinguishers with a minimum charge of 10 pounds shall be available at the site and in the area where the work is being conducted. Observe basic precautions such as no smoking or creation of sparks or open flames. 2.4 Physical Hazards Various health and safety hazards will be present during the remediation activities. A summary of the potential hazards and a statement of the hazard control measures and practices in place to minimize the risks of injury or illness. The hazard level for contaminants present during the field sampling activities is presumed to be low to none, generally requiring Level D personal protective equipment (PPE) with possible upgrades to Level C PPE should on -site monitoring or observations indicate an upgrade is necessary to protect the health and safety of on -site personnel. Head Hazards - Hazards include falling objects, sharp objects, overhead work, and bump hazards. All personnel on site will wear hardhats. Foot and Ankle Hazards - Hazards include nails, sharp objects, uneven or slippery walking surfaces, hazardous materials, dropped heavy objects, and sumps. All personnel working in the area will wear chemical resistant boots with steel -toes. All unprotected sumps and/or open holes in the work area will be barricaded. Eye Hazards - Hazards consist of sharp objects, poor lighting, flying debris or metal from drilling operations, contaminated water splashes, and contaminated soil particles. Safety glasses will be worn at all times in the work area. Musculoskeletal Hazards - Hazards include lifting heavy objects, lifting improperly, 7 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc overreaching or overextending. Hazard mitigation will consist of use of correct lifting practices, use of mechanical lifting devices, and proper placement of lifting devices. Electrical Hazards - Hazards consist of contact by equipment, both overhead and underground (in the case of buried electrical conduits). Equipment will not be positioned closer than 10 feet from any overhead electrical hazard. Each excavation site will be checked prior to commencing operations for underground electrical utilities by the utility involved or by site personnel familiar with the location of such utilities. Underground Hazards (buried utilities) - Hazards include buried natural gas, petroleum product, water, sewer, telephone, and electrical lines. Each excavation site will be checked prior to commencing operations for underground utilities by the utility involved or by site personnel familiar with the location of such utilities. Mechanical Hazards - Heavy equipment such as excavation equipment and rotary kiln/thermal desorption equipment. All equipment will be in good working order prior to arriving on site. Equipment will be checked during the coarse of work for signs of breakage or failure. When not operating excavators or front -end loader, all systems will be at a "zero energy" state, i.e., excavator bucket or loader bucket will rest on the ground. When possible, all personnel will remain outside the swing radius of the excavator or conveyors. All personnel will stand clear of elevated loads. All workers shall be alerted to the potential of trauma from moving parts on equipment. Workers will be instructed to avoid loose clothing so hands and arms won't be pulled into moving parts. Motor Vehicles- The use of heavy equipment could result in serious injury or death to workers. All workers will be alerted to the potential for accidents. All heavy equipment will have backup alarms. Workers shall be aware of the location of vehicles and heavy equipment. All heavy equipment must comply with applicable OSHA and/or WISHA regulations, including guards, lockouts, standard operating procedures and operator training. Vehicles will be inspected daily by a qualified operator of the Contractor. Trips/Fall - As with all fieldwork sites, caution will be exercised to prevent slips on rain slick surfaces, stepping on sharp objects, etc. Work will not be performed on elevated platforms without fall protection. All excavations will be enclosed with barrier tape or similar measures will be used to prevent workers from accidentally falling into an excavation. Noise - Appropriate hearing protection (ear muffs or ear plugs) will be required in the vicinity of excavators or other noise sources if high noise levels (greater than 85 dBA as an 8 -hour TWA. 115 dB for any continuous noise, or 140 dB peak as impulse or impact noise) are generated. Types of equipment capable of exceeding these levels are earthmovers, blowers and drive hammers. Personal protective equipment will be worn when working with this equipment. Lighting and Illumination - All work shall be conducted during daylight hours or nighttime hours with lighting sufficient to provide visibility of potentially hazardous objects. Confined Space Entry - Confined space entry is not anticipated to be encountered on this site. Personnel will not enter any confined space without specific approval of the Project Manager and H &S Manager. 8 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc Trenching and Shoring - Personnel entry into excavations which will create hazards with respect to collapse of dirt walls will be performed in accordance with Washington State Trenching and Shoring requirements as detailed in WAC 296- 155 -650 through WAC 296 -155- 664. Any trench that will require entry and involve excavations greater than 4' in depth must be adequately shored, sloped, sheeted, or workers provided with a trench box. The angle of slope will be determined by the type of soil as follows; Type A cohesive soil, hard compact 3/4:1 or 53 degrees Type B less cohesive soil, some moisture present 1:1 or 45 degrees Type C sandy loamy soil 1 1/2:1 or 30 degrees Storage of excavation materials must be at least 2' from the edge of the trench. An adequate means of exit must be provided within 25' of workers in trench. Excavation slopes and geotechnical guidelines are specified in the Project Design Report for this project. Heat Stress- The risk of heat stress is relatively high for those persons working in high ambient temperatures wearing impermeable Level C PPE. Because this equipment does not allow evaporation of sweat, persons required to wear this level of PPE will be monitored for heat stress when the ambient temperature is above or equal to 75-degrees F. Factors that contribute to risks associated with heat stress include ambient temperature, length of time in the suits, intensity of the work being done, permeability of garments, availability of shade, acclimatization of personnel, adequate fluids intake by personnel, and length of rest periods. Heat stress control and preventive measures include the following: • Provide plenty of liquids to replace lost body fluids. Water and/or electrolyte drinks will be used for this purpose. • Establish a work schedule that will provide appropriate rest periods. • Wear appropriate protective clothing for adverse weather conditions. • Provide personnel training on the causes of heat stress, signs and symptoms, and preventive measures. Heatstroke and heat exhaustion are possible results of physical exertion in the heat. Heatstroke is always life threatening. While heat exhaustion is a milder condition, if left unattended it can results in life - threatening conditions. Symptoms of heatstroke include the following: o Dry Hot Skin or Red or flushed skin, o No sweating, and o High body temperature Symptoms of heat exhaustion include the following: 9 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc o Pale, clammy skin o Profuse perspiration, and o Weakness, dizziness, headache, nausea, loss of appetite, and o faintness. A person with heatstroke needs to be cooled quickly and will need medical care. In order to reduce heat stress, frequent breaks are necessary to allow workers to cool down and replenish electrolytes. An individual may take a break at any time if the individual feels any of the above symptoms. A liquid replenishment station with water or electrolyte replacement fluid (Gatorade or equivalent) will be located in the "clean zone." Cold Stress - Outdoor work may result in cold exposure, especially during the winter months in the site area. When the body loses more heat than it producers, the deep body temperatures may be lowered to dangerous levels. This condition is known as hypothermia and can be serious. The symptoms of hypothermia include shivering, sleepiness, numbness, difficulty in movement, impaired ability to work, and diminished eyesight. If the condition is allowed to progress, heart failure may occur. If the symptoms of hypothermia progress beyond feeling cold and shivering, it will be necessary to seek immediate medical attention. To protect against hypothermia, field personnel must wear multi - layered cold - weather outfits, be aware of wind -chill factors, have access to a readily available warm shelter, drink warm fluids, and monitor conditions of fellow workers. 2.5 Hazard Analysis by Task WORK TASK HAZARDS PROTECTIVE MEASURES Sampling of near - surface soils Skin contact, inhalation, moving equipment, and possible heat stress. Levels C or D protective equipment, caution around equipment, air monitoring. Observation of the excavation of contaminated soils Skin contact, inhalation of vapor and particulates, fire /explosion, physical hazards of heavy equipment, noise, and possible heat stress. Levels C or D protective equipment, caution around excavating equipment, earplugs or muffs, air monitoring. 3.0 Air monitoring Exposure monitoring will be performed at the Site to confirm that no personnel are being exposed to VOC's greater than the established PELs and to evaluate any changes in airborne 10 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc contaminant concentrations that occur with the various investigations. Exposure monitoring will include: • personal breathing zone air monitoring and, • real time air monitoring of the work area using direct reading instruments while performing excavating and other operations. 3.1 Personal Monitoring 3.1.1 Application Personal breathing zone air monitoring will be performed on those individuals likely to have the highest potential exposure to those hazardous substances most likely to be present above permissible exposure limits. Tasks to be monitored will be chosen based on the existing chemical data for the media being sampled, results of previous personal monitoring conducted on site, and experience at other similar hazardous waste sites. Monitoring will begin as soon as feasible following the commencement of work on each field task. Air monitoring will be conducted to approximate the breathing zone concentrations of chemicals to the workers using a PID. If this sampling exceeds 50 percent of the permissible exposure limit (the action level), of any of the contaminants listed in the chemical exposure section, then personal air monitoring using a sampling pump and filters for gases, dusts, or heavy metals shall be conducted. 3.1.2 Personal Monitoring Action Levels When petroleum hydrocarbons and VOC's are encountered greater than 5 ppm on the PID in the breathing zone of the worker, benzene levels will initially be sampled with a detector tube. If levels exceed the action level (0.5 ppm) in the breathing zone, additional personal sampling is required with personal sampling pumps and appropriate sampling media to determine the 8 -hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). 3.2 Work Area Monitoring 3.2.1 Application Air monitoring and visual observations of the site are required to determine the effectiveness of engineering controls, to re- evaluate levels of protection and determine if site conditions have changed. At a minimum, monitoring will be done at the beginning of the work shift and periodically throughout the work. Specific monitoring locations and frequencies are given below. Air monitoring will be conducted during all activities within exclusion zones including excavation and sampling. 3.2.2 Work Area Monitoring Action Levels The action levels for real -time air monitoring at the perimeter of the exclusion zones will be as follows: 11 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc Table 5 Work Area Monitoring Action Levels INSTRUMENT ACTION LEVEL PROTECTIVE MEASURES PID 5 ppm above background at the breathing zone for more than 15 minutes Curtail operations, initiate vapor control measures Combustible Gas Meter No more than 10% of the lower explosive limit Curtail operations, initiate vapor control measures 3.3 Monitoring Instrumentation Each piece of monitoring equipment will be inspected prior to work start-up. Failure of any of the equipment listed below to work properly must be reported to the Project Health and Safety officer immediately. Work in the exclusion zone is not to continue beyond the monitoring cycle if equipment is not working properly. 3.3.1 Combustible Gas /Oxygen Meter Calibrate prior to each day's activities according to manufactures instructions. Set the alarm to auditory. If odor, taste or discomfort is detected by the crew monitor continuously, or if any of the action levels below are exceeded, monitoring is to be done continuously. Action levels (Biosystems PHD Ultra or equivalent) Explosive Atmosphere (measure at the source in or near the excavation) < 10% LEL Continue activity and monitor for toxic gases > 10% Evacuate all personnel from near the excavation Oxygen (measured in breathing zone) <19.5% Evacuate area 195 -23.5% Continue monitoring >23.5% Remove and shut off ignition sources and investigate for cause of excursion 3.3.2 Photo ionization Detector (PID) Zero prior to each day's activities, according to manufacturer's instruction. Record any 12 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc calibration with the span gas in the health and safety logbook. Use Manufacturer's recommendations for calibration. Recalibrate often, as the instruments are sensitive to dust. If the excavation crew detects odors or tastes, monitoring is to be done continuously. Action Levels: (Mini Rae or equivalent) Less than 5 parts per million on the PID above back ground levels at the breathing zone height for 15 minutes: Wear level "D" protective clothing. Respiratory protection is not required us long as benzene concentrations remain below the action level of 0.5 ppm in the breathing zone. 5 -25 ppm continuous readings in the breathing zone (averaged over a 15 minute period): Wear Level C half mask respirators with high efficiency - organic vapor cartridges in addition to the protective clothing (As long as no benzene level in excess of 10 ppm is recorded). 25 -50 ppm continuous readings in the breathing zone (for 15 minutes): Wear full -face respiratory protection with high efficiency organic vapor cartridges in addition to the protective clothing. Levels greater than 50 ppm for a one minute average: Evacuation of the work area. Work: should not continue until additional readings have been obtained by the Site Safety and Health Officer in an appropriate level of protection. 4.0 Site Control 4.1 Site Zones A regulated area consisting of an exclusion zone will be established around the perimeter of the operations. Only persons with appropriate training and authorization from the Site Health and Safety Officer will enter this perimeter while work is being conducted there. Fencing, traffic cones, barrier tapes, and warning signs will be used as necessary to establish the zone boundary. A contamination reduction zone will be established outside the contaminated site areas to decontaminate equipment and personnel before leaving the site. Care will be taken to prevent the spread of contamination from this area. Drums are available to dispose of used protective clothing and decontamination fluids. The contamination reduction zone will have a two -stage boot wash that will be used by all personnel leaving the regulated area. The soapy water changed daily (or as soon as it is visibly contaminated). A support zone will be established outside the contamination reduction zone to store protective clothing and respirators. In addition this area shall be used to stage clean equipment, don protective clothing, take rest breaks, and eat lunch. No contaminated equipment or personnel are allowed in this area. 13 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc 4.2 Waste Handling and Spill Containment If a chemical spill occurs on site such as gasoline, diesel, hydraulic fluid etc. the material will be placed in DOT approved drums and sealed. The materials will be sampled to determine the appropriate disposal method, if applicable. 4.3 Location of Safety Equipment Safety equipment that must be available on site at readily accessible locations include: A portable First aid kit, approved eyewash kit, stretcher or blanket, clean water, paper cups, and two 10 -pound ABC fire extinguishers. Safety equipment will be located in the contamination reduction zone, support zone and in close proximity to the site. 4.4 No Smoking No personnel will be allowed to smoke on the site at any time. 5.0 Personal Protective Equipment Levels of Protection at this site: Level C Level D For most activities at this site, the PPE will require Level C or D as a modified protection level, incorporating respiratory protection only where required by site conditions. The selection and use of PPE are detailed in this section. Whenever possible, engineering controls will be employed to control the potential for worker exposure to hazards. The basic requirements presented in this section and decision to increase, decrease, or modify the level of worker protection can be made on site based on the professional judgment of the Site Health and Safety Officer or a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH). The descriptions presented below focus on petroleum products and byproducts and on heavy metals as being the primary exposure hazards. Excavation, thermal desorption and sampling operations will involve Level D PPE work and possible Level C work. The decision to upgrade to Level C will be used where engineering controls (such as use of brush fans, working up -wind, water spray, etc.) are not adequate to protect the safety of the workers. The major hazards that field personnel will be exposed to during these activities consist of the following: • Inhalation of airborne contaminants in the form of vapors, dust or contaminated soils, and • Skin contact with, or ingestion of, contaminated soils. Personal monitoring will be conducted to evaluate personal exposure. The results of the monitoring will be used to determine the need to upgrade or downgrade the levels of protections needed. The decision to upgrade to a higher level of protection or downgrade to a lower level 14 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc will be based on risk assessments made by the Site Health and Safety Officer in conjunction with a CIH, and the Project Manager. Descriptions of PPE levels are presented below: Level A - Requires a fully encapsulating garment and self - contained breathing apparatus (SBCA). This level of protection will be used when the airborne hazards reach immediately dangerous to Life or health (IDLH) levels. The equipment consists of the following: • Self - contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) • Fully encapsulating chemical- Resistant Level B - Requires a semi- encapsulating garment and an air- supplied respirator. This level of protection will be used when there are mixed airborne hazards, when there is an oxygen - deficient atmosphere, or where there is a mixed airborne hazard for which an accepted mechanical filter respirator is not available. Level C - Workers performing site activities where skin contact with contaminated materials is possible will wear chemically resistant gloves (nitrile or neoprene outer gloves, surgical inner gloves) during all activities with potential for skin contact with contaminated media. Use goggles as necessary to avoid splashes in the eyes or face. When performing any activities in which inhalation of dusts is a concern, wear half- mask or full -face air - purifying respirators with HEPA filter cartridges. If respirators are used, cartridges should be changed on a daily basis, at minimum. They should be changed more frequently if breathing becomes difficult due to overloaded filters. Level D - Workers performing general site activities where, skin contact with free product or contaminated materials is not likely and inhalation risks are not expected, will wear regular work clothes or regular or polyethylene coated TYVEK, eye protection, hard hat (as required), nitrile or neoprene coaled work gloves (as required), and steel -toed rubber safety boots. 6.0 Personal Hygiene and Decontamination In order to prevent that contaminated materials from spreading from the site, proper decontamination (decon) procedures will be employed for both equipment and personnel. Site personnel will undergo a two -stage decontamination of boots, which will involve a detergent wash using scrub brush, followed by a spray water rinse. 6.1 Decontamination Procedures At the discretion of the Site Safety and Health Officer, personnel will be required to decontaminate with known or suspected contamination before eating lunch or leaving the site. Full Decontamination Procedures: a) Detergent wash (Alconox) and clean water rinse boots and outer gloves. b) Remove protective coveralls c) Remove respirator, wash and rinse in separate buckets. d) Remove work boots and put on street shoes. 15 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc e) Wash hands and face, shower as soon after work shift as possible in the designated area. 6.2 Minimization of Contamination Minimize personnel and equipment used in contaminated areas. Send only the required amounts soil or water to laboratories for analysis. Do not kneel on contaminated ground, or perform any practice that increases the probability of hand -to -mouth transfer of contaminated materials (eating, drinking, chewing gum, smoking or chewing tobacco). Use plastic drop cloths and equipment covers where appropriate. 7.0 Medical Surveillance A medical surveillance program has been instituted for employees having potential exposure to hazardous substances. Exams are routinely given before assignment, annually thereafter, and upon termination. Content of exams is determined by the Occupational Medicine physician in compliance with applicable regulations and is detailed in the General H &S Plan. Each team member with potential for contaminant exposure will have undergone a physical examination as noted above in order to verify that he /she is physically able to use protective equipment, work in hot environments, and not to be predisposed to occupational disease. Additional exams may be needed to evaluate specific exposures or unexplained illness. 7.1 Occupational injury /illness Reporting Any employee who incurs lost -time due to occupational injury or illness during the period of the contrast must be evaluated by the occupational physician. The employee's supervisor shall be provided with a written statement indicating the employee's fitness (ability to return to work), signed by the occupational physician, prior to the employee to re -enter the work -site. A copy of this written statement shall be submitted to the Project Manager. An accident report in accordance with WAC 296 -27 -15505 shall be completed; and copies of such report shall be submitted to the Construction Manager. 8.0 Emergency Response and Contingency Plan The purpose of this procedure is to define responsibilities and provide guidelines for emergency response in the event of a chemical spill, a fire, or an accident (injury). 8.1 Procedures The Site Health and Safety Officer will make all decisions relative to emergency situations. The Site Health and Safety Officer will determine the need to contact appropriate agencies for assistance and make all decisions. In all emergency cases of fire, explosion, worker injury, or significant potential thereof, the emergency authorities listed in this plan will be contacted. In cases where no immediate danger exists to personnel in contaminated areas, response personnel will wear at least that level of protective clothing which personnel in contaminated areas are required to wear. In a life - threatening situation, lower levels of protection may be 16 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc considered adequate for entry into potentially toxic environments. In the event that an emergency develops on -site, the procedures delineated herein are to be immediately followed. Emergency conditions are considered to exist if any member of the field crew is involved in an accident or experiences any adverse exposure symptoms while on -site, or a condition is discovered that suggests the existence of a situation more hazardous than anticipated. The following emergency procedures should be followed: 1. The Site Health and Safety Officer shall signal to evacuate. 2. All personnel will be accounted for at pre- designated areas. 3. All personnel exiting the Exclusion Zone will proceed with all proper PPE decontamination procedures. 4. The Site Safety and Health Officer will assess the nature of the emergency from an observation point near the edge of the exclusion zone. 5. In the event that any member of the field crew experiences any adverse exposure symptoms while on -site, the entire field crew should immediately halt work and act according to the instructions provided by the site safety officer. 6. The discovery of any condition that would suggest the existence of a situation more hazardous than anticipated should result in the evacuation of the field team and re- evaluation of the hazard and the level of protection required. 9.0 Logs, Reports, and Record keeping The Site Safety and Health Officer or the approved alternate will be responsible for on -site record keeping which will include: Certificates of basic training and medical surveillance, daily logs of workers and visitors present at the site, attendance lists for those attending site - specific safety sessions, accident reports, air monitoring results, and signatures of employees who have read the Health and Safety Plan. 17 Site Specific Health & Safety Plan Swift Trucking Site, Seattle WA August 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc I have read the Health and Safety Plan pertaining to the work to be performed. I understand the contents of this Plan and agree to aide by its provisions. Any questions I had regarding the plan have been satisfactorily answered. Name (Print) Signature Date 18 • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants 6034 N Star Rd. • Ferndale, Washington 98248 Telephone (360) 380 -0862 (FAX 360 - 380 -0862) Cell (206) 498 -6616 e-mail: mdalton @dofnw.com (Kirkland, WA Office — 425- 827 -4588) MEMORANDUM TO: Marcelo Garces - Sabey Corp. FROM: Matt Dalton DATE: July 24, 2006 RECEIVED SUBJECT: Refined Estimate of Remedial Action Areas AUG 14 2006 Former Swift Trucking Site TUKWILA Tukwila, Washington PUBLIC WORKS REF. NO: SAB -024 CC: Dave Cooper - DOF This technical memorandum presents the refined estimated remedial action areas on the former Swift Trucking site based on geoprobe sampling completed on July 10, 2006. It is a supplement to the draft Remediation Plan dated June 24, 2005. The site layout and former UST locations are shown on Figure 1. Nineteen geoprobes were advanced and sampled at the locations shown on Figure 2. Probe logs are presented in Attachment 1. Selected samples were analyzed for gasoline, diesel and motor oil range hydrocarbons and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. The results of previous sampling (2005) are summarized in Table 1 while Table 2 summarizes the results of the current sampling and analysis. Pertinent data and site observations are summarized in Table 3. Remediation Areas and Excavation Depths The remediation areas were generally identified based on an Environmental Site Assessment prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (DOF 2005). The contaminants of concern are petroleum hydrocarbons within the following areas illustrated on Figure 2: • Waste Oil Area - Located on the south side of the shop building where a 2,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST) containing waste oil was removed in 1995. CORRECTION LT R# • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Former Swift Trucking Site Page 2 July 24, 2006 • Gas/Diesel Area — Located on the north side of the shop building where a diesel (10,000 gallon) and a gasoline /diesel (4,000 /5,000 gallon) USTs were removed in 1995. • P -18 Area — Located approximately 140 feet north of the shop building just south of the concrete apron next to the terminal building. The source of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination is not known. No additional sampling was completed in this area during the work. The overall goal of the remediation is to remove as much of the contaminated soil as practical. The estimated refined excavation areas are shown on Figure 2. The extent of actual excavation will depend on field observations and sampling during, the remediation. Available data indicate that most of the contamination resides in a "smear zone" near the water table. The primary contaminant targets are gasoline and diesel range hydrocarbons. During our recent sampling, the water table was measured to be approximately three feet (MW -6) to five feet (MW -5) below ground surface. Most of the excavation is expected to extend to several feet below the water table. Some excavation may need to go to depths of up to seven to eight feet (e.g. location R7). It is not likely that all contamination can be practically removed by excavation. It is recommended that Oxygen Release Compound (ORC) be mixed with the backfill to enhance the natural degradation of residual petroleum hydrocarbons. CLOSING The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. These services were performed consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is solely for the use and information of our client unless otherwise noted. Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party's sole risk. Opinions and recommendations contained in this report apply to conditions existing when services were performed and are intended only for the client, purposes, locations, time frames, and project parameters indicated. We are not responsible for the impacts of any changes in environmental standards, practices or regulations subsequent to performance of services. We do not warrant the accuracy of information supplied by others, or the use of segregated portions of this report. r. • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Former Swift Trucking Site Page 3 July 24, 2006 List of Tables Table 1 — Summary of Soil Quality Data — 2005 Table 2- Soil Quality Data Collected in 2006 Table 3 — Summary of Data and Observations in Remediation Areas List of Figures Figure 1 — Site Plan Detail — Maintenance Bldg. Area Figure 2 — Probe Locations and Remedial Action Areas List of Attachments Attachment A — 2006 Probe Logs TABLE 1 - Summary of Soil Quality Data - 2005 Swift Trucking Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Location Spl. Depth (feet) Petroleum Hydrocarbons PCB Aroclors Total Metals Diesel Motor Oil HC -ID 1016 1242 1248 1254 1260 1221 1232 PCBs Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Zinc (mg /kg) (mg/kg) (ug /kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug/kg) (ug /kg) (ug /kg) (ug /kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg /kg) (mg /kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) T1SW 4.5 <25 <50 -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- T1EW 4.5 55 <50 -- -- -- -- -- - - - -- -- -- - -- -- -- T23SW 5 2000 <50 -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -- T4SW 4 3400 1800 -- -- -- - - -- - --- - - -- -- --- -- - -- ---- PW1 2 -3 5.7 18 DRO /RRO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <5 <0.2 21.6 2 <0.04 31.7 P2 9 9.3 73 DRO /MO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <6 <0.2 28.4 <2 <0.05 32.8 PW3 8 -10 51 300 DIESEUMO/ <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 <37 5 <0.2 33.1 3 <0.05 34 PW4 0.5 -1 27 300 DRO /MO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <5 <0.2 30.5 3 <0.05 44.2 PW5 7 -8 <54 480 - <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <6 <0.2 37.2 18 <0.06 42.6 P7 5 <5.5 25 RRO <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <36 <5 <0.2 26.8 2 <0.05 36.6 P9 6 <6.2 22 RRO <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <6 <0.2 31.4 2 <0.05 32.3 P11 4 510 7100 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <6 <0.2 26.2 18 <0.05 45.8 P12 8-10 7000 1800 DIESEUMO <38 <38 <38 130 <38 <38 <38 130 <6 <0.2 15.4 4 <0.06 43.1 P13 1 -3 96 860 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <10 <0.5 20 14 <0.05 249 P14 5 -6 85 440 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 310 <41 <41 <41 310 <6 <0.2 22.1 7 0.04 38.2 P15 1 -2 7100 250 DIESEURR <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <40 <6 <0.3 25 11 <0.05 38.5 P15 10 -11 72 130 DRO /RRO <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <10 <0.5 24 9 <0.05 57 P16 7 -9 710 980 DIESEUMO <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <460 <6 <0.2 17.1 8 <0.06 48.7 P17 2-4 15 130 DRO /RRO <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 <46 11 <0.3 17.9 11 <0.07 29.1 P18 1 -2 1400 9100 DRO /MO <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 <6 <0.2 28.5 3 <0.04 33.9 P18 8 -9 250 1000 DRO /MO <60 <60 <60 <120 450 <60 <60 450 <6 <0.2 17.1 9 <0.06 39.3 P19 7 -9 3600 1000 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 <6 <0.2 54.6 11 <0.05 34.5 P20 6 -7 28 90 DRO /MO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41. <41 <41 <41 8 <0.2 15.3 7 <0.05 51.2 P21 5-7 500 4900 DRO /MO <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 <39 30 1.2 630 166 <0.04 251 PW22 4-6 210 33 DIESEUMO <41 99 <41 <41 <41 <41 <41 99 <6 <0.2 32.6 12 <0.06 62.8 P23 8 -10 36 300 DRO /MO <42 <42 <42 56 42 <42 <42 98 <6 <0.3 28.1 24 <0.05 54.3 PW24 4 -6 52 300 DRO /MO <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 <42 7 0.7 23.7 91 0.08 109 P25 4 -6 18 120 DRO /MO <39 <39 <39 47 <39 <39 <39 47 <6 <0.2 22.3 8 <0.05 45.5 P26 3-4 14 86 DRO /MO <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <38 <6 <0.2 25.5 14 <0.05 78.1 P27 4 -6 10 31 DRO /RRO <41 <41 <41 98 56. <41 <41 154 7 <0.2 27.3 5 <0.05 44.4 PW28 3 -4 140 1200 DIESEUMO <41 <41 <41 <41 <41, <41 <41 <41 <5. <0.2 26.9 16 <0.05 51.3 Cleanup Level 2000 2000 -- na na na na na ' na na 1000 20 2 2000(a) 250 2 24000 Method A A - - - -- -- - - -- - - -. -- -- A A A A A A B Background - -- - -- -- -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - -- -- 20 1 48 24 0.07 85 Notes: Diesel quantificaiton range C12 to C24 Motor Oil quantification range C24 to C38. DRO /RRO indicates results of analyses or additional hydrocarbons in samples are not identifiable. (a) as Chromium III Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 1 (PH 2 ESA Soil Quality A- Sheetl) • • TABLE 2 - Soil Quality Data Collected July 2006 Former Swift Trucking Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Sample Units Date Depth (feet) NWTPH -G (mg/kg) Benzene (ug /kg) Toluene (ug/kg) Ethylbenzene ( ug/kg) Xylenes (ug/kg) NWTPH -D (mg /kg) NWTPH -O (mg /kg) Type R1 -2 7/10/2006 2 — — — -- — <6.1 <12 -- R2-4 7/10/2006 4 — — — — -- 64 310 DRO /RRO R3 -9 7/10/2006 9 — — — -- — 9.7 43 DRO /RRO R4 -5 7/10/2006 5 — — — — — 1000 <59 Diesel R5 -5 7/10/2006 5 — — — -- -- 3100 1300 Diesel /Motor Oil R6 -6 7/10/2006 6 — — — — — 1400 4700 DRO /RRO R7 -6 7/10/2006 6 — — — — — 4600 270 Diesel /RRO R8 -11 7/10/2006 11 — — -- — — 9800 <600 Diesel R9 -6 7/10/2006 6 <11 <26 <53 <53 <210 27 61 Diesel /RRO R10 -6 7/10/2006 6 — — -- — <6.2 . <12 -- R11-6 7/10/2006 6 <10 <26 <51 <51 <200 <7.4 30 RRO R12 -4 7/10/2006 4 — — — — -- 7100 <500 Diesel R13 -5 7/10/2006 5 <12 <31 <62 <62 <250 34 31 Diesel /RRO R14 -8 7/10/2006 8 — — — — -- 2100 <140 Diesel R15 -8 7/10/2006 8 — — — — — 690 130 Diesel /Motor Oil R16-7 7/10/2006 7 270 <20.0 <39.9 180 <160(1) 66 30 Diesel /Motor Oil R17 -7 7/10/2006 7 290 <21.6 <43.1 <43.1 <170 (2) - 65 46 Diesel /Motor Oil R18 -7 7/10/2006 7 — — — -- -- 11 14 DRO /RRO R19 -6 7/10/2006 6 20.6 <18.4 <36.9 <36.9 <150 210 420 DRO /RRO CUL 100(3) 30 7000 .6000 9000 2000 2000 -- Notes: (1) - o- xylene detected at 120 ug/kg (2) - o- xylene detected at 110 ug/kg (3) - Benzene was not detected in ground -water samples collected from monitoring wells in February 2005. Benzene was detected in probe P22 at a concentration of 4.3 ug/I that is below the ground -water CUL of 5 ug/I. Benzene has not been detected in any soil samples submitted for analysis. Based on these analyses the gasoline -range hydrocarbon CUL of 100 mg /kg is recommended. -- - Not analyzed Concentrations in dry weight CUL - MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels DRO /RRO indicates results of analyses or additional hydrocarbons in samples are not identifiable Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 1 (Soil Data Sum 7 -06 Sampling - Sheet /) TABLE 3 - Summary of Data and Observations in Remediation Areas Former Swift Trucking Site 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Location Sample Depth (ft) GRO (mglkg) DRO (mglkg) MO (mglkg) Total TPH (mg /kg) Sampling Observations Gas /Diesel Area R4 4 - -- 1000 <59 1000 Sheen, fuel oil odor 4' -8' R5 5 — 3100 1300 4400 Sheen, fuel oil odor 4' -7' R6 6 -- 1400 4700 6100 Asphalt -like at 7' -8' R7 6 -- 4600 270 4870 Sheen, oily 5' -7' R8 11 — 9800 <600 9800 Sheen, fuel odor 9' -11.5' R12 4 — 7100 <500 7100 Fuel odor 3'-4' R16 7 270 66 30 96 Fuel odor at 7 -7.5' R17 7 290 65 46 111 No indications of contamination on log P15 2 — 7100 250 7350 Petroleum odor 1' -2' P15 10 -- 72 130 202 Slight petroleum odor 7' -11.5' P19 8 — 3600 1000 4600. Petroleum odor P21 6 — 500 4900 5400 No indications of contamination on log T23SW 5 — 2000 <50 2000 During UST removals Waste Oil Area GW-4 -- -- -- -- — Free product noted during drilling R14 8 — 2100 <140 2100 No sample recovery 4' -8' R15 8 — 690 130 820 Trace sheen, oil odor 7-8' P12 9 — 7000 1800 8800 Petroleum odor below 4' T4SW 4 -- 3400 1800 5200 During UST removals P11 4 -- 510 7100 7610 No indications of contamination on log P -18 Area P18 2 -- 1400 9100 10500 Petroleum odor P18 8 — 250 1000 1250 Petroleum odor Notes: GRO - Gasoline -range hydrocarbons DRO - Diesel -range organics MO - Motor -oil range organics Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 1 (Rem Area Summary- Sheetl ) • • P -7 ® P-6 GW -3 UST #1 P -9 Exist Waste Oil AST ❑ Quest Soil SpI. (1996) • GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well • MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well P Probe Location PW Probe Location with Ground - Water Sample Attempt 30 0 Ctttttt . P -10 e IO 1 im i 1° j y 1 ® P -17 InT1EW Area of Tank Excavation UST #3 UST #2 Prev. 4,000/5000 gal Gasoline /Diesel UST • T1SW P -16 Prev. 10,000 g51' I Diesel UST _ I GW -� T23SW 0 E 0 CC re 0. �a E 11 at NN o. v ~> — °O O m m =i2 U � Lube Room t= 2 P -15 11 I P -14 �l Sump and C.0 0 we San. Seem! phi Grouted and : Condoned Waste Oil Su ps and Ilne to Waste 011 •T Sand -Oil S GW-4 p Sump (to San. Sewer) T? Exist Scale House Exist Scale Pit Sump (to San. Sewer) Previous 1.000!3,000 gallon Waste Oil UST '`(�P -12 UST #4 dt►® I P -13 GW -2 j CU Area of Tank Excavation T4SW P -11 s MW -6 P -19 -Exist Dispense 30 60 Scale in Feet (approximate) Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: SAB -024 probe well site map det.cdr Site Plan Detail Maintenance Building Area SAB -024 FIGURE 1 Mar. 2005 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglcvand, Inc. 35th Ave. S. P -7 P-8 ED P -17 PW -22 T23SW Gas/Diesel Area 17 R18 GW-4 Waste Oil Area R14 R P -10® T4SW R1 South 124th St. Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: Refine Probes.cdr MW-6 19 R9 0 MW-5 P -20 ✓ UST Excavation Spl. (1996) fi GW -1 to 4 Previous Monitoring Well • MW-5 to 7 Recent Monitoring Well e P Probe Location 2005 PW Probe Location with Ground -Water Sample Attempt 2005 (@ R Probe Location 2006 • Site Observations and Sample Analyses Indicate Conditions Below CULs Site Observations and Sample Analyses Indicate Conditions Exceed CULs Estimated Remedial Action Area 0 Scale in Feet 100 (approximate) Based on free product being observed during the drilling of the well In 1996. P -25 P-27 P -26 PW-28 Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th Si Tukwila, WA Probe Locations and Remedial Action Areas SAB.024 FIGURE 2 July 2006 °altum, Olmsted At Fugl�r�and. Inc. • • ATTACHMENT 1 GEOPROBE LOGS R -1 TO R -19 2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fut:levand, Inc. Environmental Consultants DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES 8 DAT • Location R1 • SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -114° dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description R1 -2 grab 0-4 36 0830 0 -1.5 Moist, mot bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 1.5 -2.5' 1.5-4 Wet. Gry, silty, F SAND 4-8 36 as above 8 -12 36 8-8.5 Concrete & Gravel 8.5 -12 Wet, bwn, PEAT LABORATORY SAMPLES: R1 -2 for NWTPH -DX Depth(ft.) 0 SUMMARY LOG 1.5 Moist, mottled brown, gravelly, silty, SAND concrete fragments 8 8.5 12 Wet, gray, silty, fine SAND Concrete / gravel Wet, brown, PEAT (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R1 Sheet 1 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuelevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R2 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft) From - To Spl length inches Time • Sample Description 0-4 36 0 -1.5 Moist, mot bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 1.5-4 Wet. Gry, silty, F SAND R1-4 grab 4-8 36 0930 4 -7' as above with trace asphalt, gravel 3.5 -4.5' 7 -8' concrete and gravel rubble 8 -12 12 8-8.5 Concrete & Gravel 8.5 -12 Wet, bwn, PEAT LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 0 1.5 8. 5 1 R2-4 for NWTPH -DX Moist, mottled brown, gravelly, silty, SAND concrete fragments Wet, gray, silty, fine SAND Concrete / gravel Wet, brown, PEAT (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples. drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R2 Sheet 2 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Futrlevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R3 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 30 0 -1.5 Moist, mot bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 1.5-4 Wet. Gry, silty, F SAND 4-8 36 as above with trace organics R3 -9 grab 8 -12 36 1000 8-9' as above with trace asphalt & gravel 8.5 -9' 9 -11' Wet, gry, silty SAND with brick fragments 11 -12' Wet, bwn, PEAT LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R3 -9 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARYLOG 1.5 11 1 (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R3 Sheet 3 of 19 7/24/2006 Moist, mottled brown, gravelly, silty, SAND concrete fragments I Wet, gray, silty, fine SAND Wet, gray, silty, SAND, with brick fragments Wet, brown, PEAT (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R3 Sheet 3 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuzlevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R4 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Concrete slab Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F ' Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -114" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 0 very soft, no recovery R4 -5 grab 4-8 30 1030 Wet, gry, silty, F SAND 4.5 -5.5 with sheen, fuel odor 8 -12 48 8 -11 as above grading to a gravelly,sitty, SAND, stained 11 -12' wet, gry, silty, SAND LABORATORY SAMPLES: R4 -5 for NWTPH -DX Depth(ft.) 0 SUMMARY LOG 7 9 11 12 stiffer drilling no recovery to 4' Wet, gray, silty, fine SAND shenn, fuel odor Wet, grey, gravely, silty, SAND Stained, asphalt -like Wet, gray, silty, SAND (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R4 Sheet 4 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fualevand. Inc. Environmental Consultants DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES & DATA Location R5 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 ' Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description • 0-4 36 Moist, mot gry-bwn, silty, SAND with some gravel R5 -5 grab 4-8 30 ' 1100 as above with sheen, fuel odor to 7' 4.5 -5.5 7 -8' wet, bik, gravelly, SAND, asphalt-like 8 -12 48 wet, gry, silty, SAND with gravelly interbeds @ 10 LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R5 -5 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARY LOG 7 8 12 Moist to wet, mottled gray - brown, silty SAND Fuel odorlsheen from 4 -T Wet, grey, gravely, silty, SAND Stained, asphalt -like ' Wet, gray, silty, SAND gravelly interbed at 10' (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R5 Sheet 5 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES & DATA Location R6 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E-rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4° dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 36 Moist, mot gry, gravelly, silty, SAND R6-6 grab 4-8 36 1130 4 -5' as above 5-7' wet, mot gry, silty, F SAND 5.5 -6.5' 7 -8' wet, blk, gravelly, SAND, asphalt-like 8-12 48 8 -10' wet, gry, gravelly, SAND, slight sheen 10 -12' Wet, mot gry-bwn, silty SAND, with scattered organics LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 1 1 R6-6 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARY LOG 5 Moist, mottled gray, silty SAND Wet, mottled gray, silty, Fine SAND Wet, grey, gravely, SAND Stained, asphalt4ike (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R6 Sheet 6 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fu¢levand, Inc. Environmental Consultants BORING - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES & DATA Location R7 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 0 no recovery R7-6 grab 4-8 36 1145 4 -5' wet, dk bwn, organic silt 5-7' wet, gry, silty, SAND w /sheen, oily 5.5 -6.5' 7-8' damp, gry, gravelly, SAND, no odor 8 -12 48 8 -11' wet, mot gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 11 -12' Wet, concrete, gravel fill LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R7-6 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARY LOG 4 5 7 8 11 12 no recovery wet, dark brown, organic, SILT Wet, gray, silty, SAND with oily sheen Damp, gray, gravelly SAND Wet, mottled gray, gravelly, silty, SAND slight sheen concrerte/gravel 811 (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R7 Sheet 7 of 19 7/24/2006 • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES & DATA Location R8 • SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action SpI Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 36 0 -2' Damp, gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 2-4' wet, bwn, silty, F SAND w/ organic silt interbed 4-8 48 4-6' Wet, bwn silty, F SND 6-8' Wet, mot gry, gravelly, sitty, SAND wlbrick frag R8 -11 grab 8 -12 48 1200 8 -9' as above 10.5 -11.5 9 -11.5' wet, gry, silty, SAND w/ sheen, fuel odor 11.5 -12' Damp, gry, gravelly, SAND LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 2 4 11. 1 R8 -11 for NWTPH -DX MMARY LOG Damp, gray, gravelly, silty, SAND Wet, Brown, silty, Fine SAND with organic silt interbed Wet, mottled gray, gravelly, silty, SAND Wet, mottled gray, gravelly, silty, SAND with brick fragments Wet, gray, silty, SAND with sheen, fuel odor (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R8 Sheet 8 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuelevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants PLES & DATA Location R9 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' Tong x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spi.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time . Sample Description 0-4 24 0-1.5' Damp, gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 1.5-4' wet, bwn, organic, silty, F SAND 4-8 48 4 -6' Wet, bwn silty, F SAND w/ trace organics R9 -6 grab hard © 6' 1230 6-8' Damp, gry, gravelly, SAND w /concrete 5.5 -6.5' hard 8-12 24 Damp, gry, gravelly, SAND w /concrete LABORATORY SAMPLES: R9-6 for NW W TPH -DX, NTPH- G /BTEX Depth(ft.) 2 4 2 SUMMARY LOG Damp, gray, gravelly, silty, SAND Wet, Brown, Organic, silty, Fine SAND Wet, brown, silty, Fine SAND with trace organics Damp, gray, gravelly, SAND with concrete (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R9 Sheet 9 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuelevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R10 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches, Time Sample Description 0-4 24 , 0 -1' Damp, gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 1-4' wet, dk bwn, silty, SAND w /some organics 4 -8 48 4-6' as above grading sandier R10-6 grab hard @ 6' 1300 6-8' wet, gry, F -M SAND w /silt interbeds 5.5-6.5' hard 8 -12 48 as above to 8.5' 8.5 -10.5' wet. mot gry, gravelly, SAND w /trace sift 10.5 -11' concrete rubble 11 -12' wet, gry, silty, SAND w /peat @ base LABORATORY SAMPLES: R9-6 for NWTPH-DX, NWTPH -G /BTEX Depth(ft.) 0 SUMMARY LOG 1 10. 1 1 Damp, gray, gravelly, silty, SAND Wet, Dark brown, silty, SAND with some organics Wet, gray, Fine to medium SAND with sift interbeds (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples. drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R10 Sheet 10 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevand. Inc. Environmental Consultants • Location R11 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: Asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather. sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description Wet, gray, silty, SAND 0-4 30 0 -1.5' Damp, gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 1-4' wet, dk bwn, silty, F SAND w /some organics 4-8 48 4-6' as above R11-6 grab 1330 6 -7.5' wet, mot gry, gravelly, SAND w /some silt 5.5 -6.5' 7.5-8' wet, blk, gravelly, SAND, asphalt-like, no odor 8 -12 36 as above to 9' 9 -12' Wet, gry, silty, SAND LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 0 1.5 7. 1 R11-6 for NWTPH -DX, NWTPH -G /BTEX (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R11 Sheet 11 of 19 7/24/2006 Damp, gray, gravelly, silty, SAND Wet, Dark brown, silty, SAND with some organics Wet, mottled gray, gravelly SAND, with some silt I Wet, black, gravelly, SAND asphalt -like, no odor Wet, gray, silty, SAND (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R11 Sheet 11 of 19 7/24/2006 • Dalton, Olmsted & Fu¢levand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R12 • SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: 7" concrete slab Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description R12-4 grab 0-4 30 1400 1 -3' Damp, bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 3.4' 3-4' wet, gry, silty, F SAND w /fuel odor 4-8 36 4-7' as above, no odor 7-8' Wet, mot gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 8 -12 48 as above LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R12-4 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARY LOG 3 7 Damp, brown, gravelly, silty, SAND Fuel odor from 3-4' Wet, gray, silty, Fine SAND 12 Wet, mottled gray. gravelly, silty, SAND (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with concrete. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R12 Sheet 12 of 19 7/24/2006 • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuelevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants R13 • SWIFT BORING - OtSumir l lury ur JAmrLGJ o un , n -- - -- Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co:: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: 7" concrete slab Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather. sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action SpI Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 30 Damp, bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND R13 -5 grab 4-8 30 1415 4 -6' as above, fuel odor 4.5 -5.5' 6-8' Wet, mot gry, gravelly, silty, SAND 8-12 36 8 -11' Wet, mot gry, gravelly, silty SAND w /brick 11 -12' wet, gry, F sandy, SILT w /organics LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 0 1 1 R13 -5 for NWTPH -DX, NWTPH -G /BTEX • Damp, brown, gravelly, silty, SAND Fuel odor from 4-6' Wet, gray, silty, SAND Wet, mottled gray, gravelly, silty, SAND trace brick I Wet, gray, fine sandy, SILT with trace organics 2 (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with concrete cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R13 Sheet 13 of 19 7/24/2006 • Dalton. Olmsted & Fur;levand. Inc. Environmental Consultants R14 • SWIFT 13011INC. - vebt.tur r rvry yr ammra.c.a o v..,n - - - - -- Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: 7" concrete slab Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. . Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description v soft 0-4 24 moist to wet, mot bwn -gry, F -M SAND v soft 4-8 0 no recovery R14-8 grab v soft 8 -12 24 1430 wet, gry, F sandy, SILT 8-9' LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R14-8 for NWTPH -DX 0 SUMMARY LOG 4 Damp, brown, gravelly, silty, SAND 8 no recovery 12 oily odor Q 8' Wet, gray, fine sandy, SILT (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with concrete cold- patch. Sheet 14 of 19 Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R14 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuelevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants R15 • SWIFT NVKIIVU - UCJkdk/rI iv,. WV un.nrs-�.+." err. • .... - - Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: 7" concrete slab Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7 /10 /06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E-rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 24 1 -2' moist, bwn, F -M SAND 2-4' Wet, mot bwn, silty, F SAND w /asphalt frags 4-8 36 4 -7' wet, gry, F sandy, SILT R15-8 grab 1500 7 -8' wet, gry; SAND w /some silt trace gravel 7-8' oil odor, trace sheen 8-12 36 8 -11.5' as above, no odor or sheen 11.5 -12 wet, blk, gravelly, SAND, asphalt- like,no odor LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 0 2 11. 1 R15-8 for NWTPH -DX Moist, brown, fine to medium SAND Wet, mottled brown, silty, Fine SAND with asphalt fragments wet, gray, fine sandy, SILT oily odor, sheen @ 7-8' Wet, gray, SAND, with some gravel, trace silt i wet, black, gravelly, SAND, asphalt -like, no odor 2 (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with concrete cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls RI5 Sheet 15 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants BORING - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES .4 DATA Location • R16 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Hott Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4' dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve SpI.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 48 damp to wet, mot bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND geotextile @ 2' 4-8 36 4-7 sat, mottled gry, sandy, GRAVEL, asphalt -like @ 7' R16-7 grab 1530 7 -7.5' wet, gry, gravelly, silty, SAND, fuel odor 6.5 -7.5' 7.5-8 wet, mot gry, silty, F SAND, no odor LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) R16 -7 for NWTPH -DX, NWTPH- G /BTEX 0 SUMMARY LOG 2 7 7.5 8 Ddamp to wet, mottled brown, silty, SAND geotexlile © 2' Saturated, mottled gray, sandy, GRAVEL asphalt -like wet, gray, gravelly, silty, SAND fuel odor wet, mottled gray, silty, F SAND (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R16 Sheet 16 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fustlevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Location R17 SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather. sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 36 wet, mot gry-bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 4-8 36 4-7' wet, bwn, F sandy, SILT, w/trace organics R17 -7 grab 1600 7-8' wet, gry, silty, F SAND 6.5 -7.5' LABORATORY SAMPLES: R17 -7 for NWTPH -DX, NWTPH -G /BTEX Depth(ft.) 0 SUMMARY LOG 3.5 Wet, mottled gray - brown, gravelly, silty, SAND 7 8 Wet, brown, fine sandy, SILT with trace organics Wet, gray, silty, Fine SAND (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R17 Sheet 17 of 19 7/24/2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevand. Inc. Environmental Consultants • Location R18 • SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Holt Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather. sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spi.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0-4 36 0 -2' moist, mot gry-bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 2-4' wet, bwn, silty, F SAND w /trace organics 4-8 36 4-7' as above R18-7 grab 1630 7-8' wet, mot gry-bik, gravelly silty, SAND w /asphalt, brick 6.5 -7.5' LABORATORY SAMPLES: Depth(ft.) 0 2 R18 -7 for NWTPH -DX SUMMARY LOG Wet, mottled gray - brown, gravelly, silly, SAND 7 8 Wet, brown, silty, Fine SAND with trace organics Wet, mottled gray- black, gravelly, silty, SAND with brick and asphalt fragments (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R18 Sheet 18 of 19 7/24/2006 d Dalton. Olmsted & Fuarlevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants RING - DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES B DATA • Location R19 • SWIFT Field Rep: DG Cooper Location: Drilling Co.: Hott Elevation (Ft.): Ground Surface: asphalt Driller. Dave Date Completed: 7/10/06 Drill Type: AMS 9630 Power Probe Weather: sunny 75F Size/Type Casing: E -rod Hammer Type: Sampler Type: 4' long x 1 -1/4" dia. Core retained in an acrylic sleeve Spl.No. Type sample saved Drill Action Spl Depth (Ft.) From - To Spl length inches Time Sample Description 0 -4 48 0 -3' moist, mot gry-bwn, gravelly, silty, SAND 3 -3.5' wet, bwn, fiberous organics w /gravel 3.5-4' wet.' Bwn, silty, F SAND w /root casts 4-8 48 4-5' as above R19-6 grab 1700 5-8' wet, mot gry, gravelly, silty, SAND fill 5.5 -6.6' LABORATORY SAMPLES: R19-6 for NWTPH -DX, NWTPH -GBTEX Depth(ft.) 3. 0 SUMMARY LOG 3 8 Wet, mottled gray - brown, gravelly, silty, SAND wet, brown fiberous organics with some gravel Wet, brown silty, Fine SAND with root casts wet, mottled gray, gravelly, silty, SAND (Fill) (Bottom of Boring) NOTE: The summary log is an interpretation based on samples, drill action, and interpolation. Variations between what is shown and actual conditions should be anticipated. Notes: Completed boring backfilled with granular bentonite and patched with asphalt cold- patch. Swift Refine Probe Logs.xls R19 Sheet 19 of 19 7/24/2006 • COS- -oio EXHIBIT MAP FOR SOUTH 124TH STREET VACATION CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 107.06 ge I EgIa ci INE COR LOT 9 I r && 2? a I _L 40? PCI '3,.°479171 0SS tOr 13CL' 8009 4-6•14 Oai X600095 BLDG 21 -04 N1 2.54'371f/ 21.72' N1008'26'W 39.59' 0 50 100 200 SOUTH 1241H ST — RIGHT —Or —WAY TO BE VACATED 4t4 4°7'4 pq loo ?.°0 00�, 4%76,,„ 77 N01'46'02'E 60.01' SCALE; 1' = 100' (VACATED PORTION OF 35TH AVENUE SOUTH) 2'd OV6'ON SNUA3 Q I Atia Wd6S : 2I S002'8 'mu LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel A: Lots 9 through 15, inclusive, Block 2, Riverton Addition, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 10.00 feet of said Lot 9 conveyed to the City of.Tukwila by Deed recorded under Recording Number 9009171030; TOGETHER with those portions of 35th Avenue South abutting said Lots which would attach by operation of law by Ordinance of the City of Tukwila, recorded under King County Recording Number 9009171032; (Also known as Lot A, City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number 90 -7 -BLA, recorded under Recording Number 9009171031). Parcel B: Lots 1 through 8, inclusive, and Lot 16, Block 2, Riverton Addition, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 10.00 feet of said Lot 16; and EXCEPT the South 10.00 feet of said Lot 8 conveyed to King County by Deed recorded under Recording Number 7103260266; TOGETHER with those portions of vacated 37th Avenue South which attach by operation of law; And TOGETHER with those portion of said Lot 16 and of 35`h Avenue South abutting said Lot 16 which would attach by operation of law by Ordinance of the City of Tukwila, recorded under King County Recording Number 9009171032;. TOGETHER with those portions of vacated 37th Avenue South as vacated by King County Ordinance Number 1122, which would attach by operation of law; (Also known as Lot B, City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number 90 -7 -BLA, recorded under Recording Number 9009171031). TOGETHER with Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Riverton Addition, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER with those portions of vacated 371 Avenue South as vacated by King County Ordinance Number 1.122, which attach by operation of law; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to King County for road purposes by Deeds recorded under Recording Numbers 7103250266 and 7203020432. TOGETHER with that portion of the Plat of Riverton Addition, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Volume 13. of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (continued) Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 9, Block 1, Riverton Addition, said point being on the westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence South 10 °08'26" East along said margin a distance of 107.08 feet to a point on said margin at the intersection with the northerly margin of South 124th Street and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 10 °08'26" East along said margin a distance of 39.59 feet to an angle point in said margin; Thence South 12 °54'37" East along said margin a distance of 21.72 feet to a point on said margin at the intersection with the southerly margin of said South 124th Street; Thence North 89°18'50" West along said southerly margin a distance of 695.86 feet; Thence North 01°46'02" East a distance of 60.01 feet to a point on the northerly margin of said South 124th Street; Thence South 89°18'50" East along said northerly margin a distance of 682.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situated in the City of Tukwila, Count of King, State of Washington. DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1620 W. MARINE VIEW DRIVE, SUITE 200 EVERETT, WA 98201 TEL: (425) 259 -4099 - FAX: (425) 259 -3230 • WA s;:• • z • pd .d • / `'CISTSV''•'. 1 A L L. Alt 14 kEXPIRES 12/6/2006 9 r ® P -7 ® P -8 GW -3 UST #1 1 P -9 Exist Waste Oil AST ❑ Quest Soil Spl. (1996) © GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well P Probe Location PW Probe Location with Ground- Water Sample Attempt 30 0 P -10 UST #2 SW ® P -17 T Area of Tank Excavation f UST #3 Prey. 4,000/5000 gal Gasoline /Diesel UST P -16 Prey. 10,000 gar j • Diesel UST A GW -1 T23SW Lube Room P -14 P -15 Sand -Oil Sump •o Sump and C.A To San. Sewer Grouted and andoned Waste Oil Su ps and line to Waste Oil T GW-4 Exist Scale House ,-Exist Scale Pit ED Sump (to San. Sewer) > Sump (to San. Sewer) — Previous 1,000 /3,000 gallon Waste Oil UST P -12 UST #4 GW -2 T4SW P -11 ® s MW -6^ ® P -13 Area of Tank Excavation P -19 Exist Dispense 30 Scale in Feet (approximate) 60 Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: SAB -024 probe well site map det.cdr Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Site Plan Detail Maintenance Building Area SAB -024 FIGURE 2 Mar. 2005 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. 1 35th Ave. S. Terminal Building Concrete apron jP -18 I (905002 P -7 &GW -3 T1EW^ =z T1SW P- 9,..,` PW -24 P -23f.. Asphalt PW -22 TZ3SW ; .120o0@51. P -19 tI(4600 @8'i' P -21'` 'i ,q ti (5400 @6''• ❑ UST Excavation SpI. (1996) O GW -1 to 4 Existing Monitoring Well • MW -5 to 7 New Monitoring Well e P Probe Location ® PW Probe Location with Ground -Water Sample Attempt (5400@6') Depth (feet) Sample Analyses Below CUL - See Table 1 for Results and Depth , Sample Analyses Exceed CUL Concentration (mg /kg) and A A Section Locations P -12 (8800@9') Waste Oil • • Asphdit B' P -11 (761041') South 124th St. A 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: REM SAB -024 Soil TPH b.cdr MW -6 P -20 MW -5 Gas. Diesel Area P -25 Unpaved P -27 Based on free product being observed during the drilling of the well in 1996. -26 OPW-28 Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St Tukwila, WA Locations That Exceed Petroleum Hydrocarbon Cleanup Level in Soil SAB -024 FIGURE 3 June 2005 Dalton, Ol nsted & Fuglevand, Inc. fecwEaltA twovtli Ju` 2005 ostto CEDER Relative Elevation in Feet 100 • 95 90 85 80 Waste Oil Area Gas Diesel Area A Fence Section 8-B' Shop Building Section C -C' MW -6/P11 GW -2/P12 GW-4 P -14 P -15 P -16 P -17 P -18 Area Section D -D' A' P -18 x 7610 I ;x 5200 I >r 1 I I I x 88C11 S 525 x 7350 x Gray, silly, clayey sand w/ wood, gravel and chunks of clayey silt Relative Elevation in Feet B 100 Ref: Section A.cdr 95 90 85 80 P1 Former UST Lv I GW -1 1 x 2000 Brown, granular to fibrous peat 1690 I 145 x Mixture of sandy, clayey silt and gravelly sand (fill) Former UST Excavation x 10500 x 1250 Excavation Waste Oil Area Section A-A' a 8' P10 GW -2fP12 P13 P -20 x 24 Silty sand w/ Brown, granular to fibrous peat gravel 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I -- Br. silty sand w/ gravel over clayey silt w/ gravel 118x Soil Probe P1 Monitorl Well Water Level - 2 -28 -05 MW-6 Water Level During Tank Removals - 11 -95 x 7610 TPH Conc. (mg /kg) Former UST Excavation - -- 0 50 Scale in Feet (approximate) Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St., Tukwila, WA Sections A -A' and B -B' SAB -024 FIGURE' 4 June 2005 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. RECENED-ritiofiltA CiriCtf 301- _ "6 PERMIT ER PW-4 PW -3 P -2 MW -7 PW -1 P-6 P4 GW-4 Waste Oil Area R14 R3 P -100 T4SW R1 P -1 PW -5 p -7 &GW -3 Concrete apron P -17 P -18 Area PW -22 PW -24 P -23 Gas /Diesel Area R18 South 124th St. Notes: All locations approximate - Bldg features based on available drawings, observations, and information from owner Ref: Refine Probes.cdr P -20 ✓ UST Excavation Spl. (1996) O GW -1 to 4 Previous Monitoring Well MW -5 to 7 Recent Monitoring Well e P Probe Location 2005 ED Pw Probe Location with Ground -Water Sample Attempt 2005 e R Probe Location 2006 Site Observations and Sample Analyses Indicate Conditions Below CULs Site Observations and Sample Analyses Indicate Conditions Exceed CULs Estimated Remedial Action Area MI =MONO= Scale in Feet 100 (approximate) Based on free product being observed during the drilling of the well in 1996. P -25 P -26 P -27 ►`.o` PW -28 Swift Transportation 3600 S. 124th St. Tukwila, WA Probe Locations and Remedial Action Areas SAB -024 FIGURE 2 July 2006 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc.