Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E06-007 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PUBLIC WORKS - SMALL DRAINAGE PROJECT: SOUTHGATE CREEK CULVERT REPLACEMENT
CITY OF TUKWILA PW SMALL DRAINGAE PROJ. 13422 40 AV S E06 -007 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) File Number: E06 -007 Applied: 03/29/2006 Issue Date: 06/08/2006 Status: APPROVED Applicant: TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS (RYAN LARSON) Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: SMALL DRAINAGE CITY PROJECT - SOUTHGATE CREEK CULVERT REPLACEMENT located in the vicinity of 13422 40th Ave S. Creek will be daylighted, and culvert replaced. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 13422 40 AV S TUKW 7340601001 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 qvi+ 6 date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS E06 -007 Printed: 06 -08 -2006 Dept:. Of Community Development '° =r" City of Tukwila. r AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION ,a _. .. 1, = HEREBY DECLARE THAT 1 E, Notice of Public Hearing etermi nation of Non gni Si.ficance , ¢h � Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of: :Non= � ' Significance '; .ae •g - Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Signtficance & Scoping ' Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of "Acts on= - - Planning Commission Agenda :Pkt Official Notice :` Short Subdivision Agenda Application On �� €,s , r Notice of ' Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of, App1ication:for Shorel::inesMgmt Permit ". __ FAX To Seattle Times " Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA.,98111 Other ;} Was mailed to each of the -addre sses listed on this' year 20 OQa Project Name: wi k - PV0 — �o Project Number: tb --'OD7 Mai 1er'sSignature: Su4,.. f/1/L Person requesting mailing: LC \-o)( P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE WASH () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE INGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. T EPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE > KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY () QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () POLICE () PLANNING () PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES, UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) FIRE ( ) FINANCE () BUILDING ( ) MAYOR OTHER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM () FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMR ISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) KC. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT () WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF AU. SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SENO NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW PUB? NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PER10TS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division. - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice ojApplicatlon for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General . . 'Applicant *Indian Tribes 'Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ ADMINISTRATIVE\FORMS\CHKLIST.DOC betti • U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEDERAL HIGHWAY � LADD ADMINISTRATION NISTRATION ( ) DEPT () () () () () () FEDERAL AGENCIES • () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE > KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK OTHER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDMINISTRATIV E\FORMS\CHKLIST.DOC () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA-TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWIIA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES MEDIA () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES () CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWWV PiIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PTS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination(3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes . . *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATIV EIFORMS\CIDCLIST.DOC City of Thkwlii Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Comm nay Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Rebecca Fox (2,r Date: June 8, 2006 Re: Staff Evaluation/SEPA Determination – E06-007 Southgate Creek Culvert Replacement —Small Drainage Project Project Description: Tukwila Public Works proposes to remove a culvert that is actively eroding into Southgate Creek near 13422 40th Avenue South, and restore the natural stream channel. The existing culvert embankment that is proposed for removal is located partly directly downstream of 40th Avenue South on City of Tukwila property. The project also calls for installing a 24" overflow culvert at the maintenance access upstream of the 13422 40th Avenue South driveway, and installing an earthen berm across the maintenance access. This project was identified by public complaints and City of Tukwila public works and maintenance staff as the highest priority based on maintenance needs, public nuisance and potential damage to adjacent properties. The entire Southgate Creek Culvert Replacement project is located within environmentally sensitive areas with slopes and watercourses. Daylighting the stream is intended to improve watercourse function. Best management practices for steep slopes and watercourses shall be observed during construction, and proper plantings and mitigation shall be provided after construction has concluded. Once the construction project is completed, the daylighted stream with appropriate plantings will experience decreased erosion, and improved function. Agencies with Jurisdiction: Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Other Required Permits: Special Permission Director — Tukwila Department of Community Development Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)-- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The site is generally rolling, with some steep slopes up to 30 percent at the north end of the site. (Note: Checklist does not indicate, but site includes some Class 2 and possibly Class 3 slopes.) The culvert embankment that will be replaced is now eroding into the creek. Approximately .5 acres will be cleared and graded for the project. Best Rf Q: \SEPA Small Drainage Projects E06- 007 \SEPA staffrept E06- 007small drainage.doc 06/08/2006 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 o Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 management practices will be employed to control erosion and sedimentation during construction. Disturbed areas will be replanted per comments by DCD Urban Environmentalist. • Water The project is located along Southgate Creek, a Type 3 Watercourse that flows into the Duwamish River. Work will require temporary diversion of creek flows around the project area. It is expected that the work will take place during the low flow months. Water flow diversion will be needed during construction, and it can be accomplished with a sandbag dam and portable pump. The project provides maintenance and upgrade of the existing City of Tukwila drainage system. Best management practices will be utilized to prevent sediment transport. • Plants The project site is largely vacant with deciduous trees, conifer, blackberries, lawn and ivy. Non - native grasses and blackberry will be removed. The SEPA checklist indicates that all areas are to be hydroseeded following construction. DCD's Urban Environmentalist has commented that this is inadequate, and has given direction for more appropriate plantings • Animals Insects, songbirds and rodents have been observed on or near the site. • Energy and Natural Resources No energy impacts. • Environmental Health Accidental fuel or oil spills could result from operation of heavy equipment during construction. We recommend that the contractor have spill control supplies on hand. It will be necessary to repair and fuel the equipment offsite. Construction noise will occur during work hours (typically 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.). Machines will have mufflers. All work will be in accordance with City of Tukwila noise ordinances. • Land/Shoreline Use The site is designated LDR per the Comprehensive Plan, and is zoned LDR. It has both watercourse and steep slopes. The SEPA checklist ( #8.h.) does not reference this fact. • Housing No housing units will be affected. • Aesthetics No structures are proposed, nor is a view affected. Rf 2 06/08/2006 Q: \SEPA Small Drainage Projects E06- 007 \SEPA staffrept E06- 007small drainage.doc • Light and Glare No impacts are anticipated. Construction will take place during daylight hours. • • Recreation Southgate Greenbelt Park is immediately south, west and east. • Historic and cultural preservation Part of the site is undeveloped, while a portion includes a crumbling driveway. • Transportation No transportation impacts are anticipated. • Public Services Repair and daylighting of the creek will result in reduced maintenance requirements for the City of Tukwila. No other direct public service impacts will result from this project. • Utilities All utilities are currently available at the site vicinity. Comments No comment letters were received in response to the Notice of Application. Recommendation: Pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -340, a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) is recommended. No probable significant adverse impact to the environment is anticipated through this project. The DNS is based on the impacts identified within the environmental checklist, and attachments. It is supported by plans, policies and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Rf 3 06/08/2006 Q: \SEPA Small Drainage Projects E06- 007 \SEPA staffrept E06- 007small drainage.doc Rebecca Fox - Re: Southgate Creek drainage SEPA (E06 -007) 41lO S .SetfatM " From: Ryan Larson To: Rebecca Fox • "IPA re prillat Date: 6/1/06 1:30PM Subject: Re: Southgate Creek drainage SEPA (E06 -007) Rebecca, The steep slopes will cause _difficulties_for_construction. We do not anticipate any landslide issues during or following construction. We are adding a small retaining wall where we are removing the driveway to stabilize the slope on the roadway side. The important thing to consider is that we are removing fill that was place years ago and returning the area to its original condition. Minor sloughing may occur but this is the natural stream process and it is not anticipated to cause any damage to private property or the roadway. We are installing two logs to control stream bed cutting that may occur. I do not believe channel migration will be a problem since the steam is fairly straight in this section, we are not changing any of the stream above and below, and the steam is very confined within the steep banks. I will forward a copy of the HPA once it is obtained. Thanks - Ryan »> Rebecca Fox 05/31/06 03:12PM »> Hi Ryan, I'm working on the staff report of the SEPA determination for the Southgate Creek drainage project (E06 -007), and need a bit more info about both the steep slopes and watercourse. Typically, we require both a geotech report and watercourse study in a project of this type. 1) Steep Slopes: Are there any concerns about working in the steeply - sloped area? Any further issues that would affect development in the slope area? Other information? 2) Watercourse: Sandra has prepared some comments on stream bed mitigation. Are there any other factors that will affect work in or around the stream bed? 3) HPA permit: Please forward me a copy of the HPA permit for the file when you receive it. Thank you. (I will be out of the office from mid -day 6/1 until 6/6) Rebecca. Page 1 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION The following has been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: Tukwila Public Works Department LOCATION: FILE NUMBER: PROPOSAL: Southgate Creek -- Vicinity 13422 40th Avenue South E06 -007 - -SEPA /Environmental Review Replace culvert on Southgate Creek upstream from 13422 40th Avenue South OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permit Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW) FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW i The files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Please call (206) 431 -370 to ensure that the files will be available OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on the SEPA application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on June 2, 2006. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact project planner Rebecca Fox (206) 431- 3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: 3/29/06 Notice of Completeness Issued: 5/15/06 Notice of Application Issued: 5/18/06 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I RYAn/ L//e5oA/ (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on S / /R%O& the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 - and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at /3'/2Z 1OrA s • so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number EGA — 007 . I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and irritmediately dispose of the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in at' ely ma er or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice letter. Appl ant or Project Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this // day of /' ll ,200(e. 6/4/L /4641v441 NOTARY PUBLIC in an for the State of Washington /6V6 ClnrrY residing at My commission expires on /y —AO P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \SEPAAPP.doc April 4, 2006 • • Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila J T . AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION K /, (AWL -CD CHEREBY DECLARE THAT: .3 Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance L Notice of Public .Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non :.;T; Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Name: ' 0 .0 (/1-e6K ' S Determination of Significance &rScoping; Notice Mailer's Signature: Ll 64/0 Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Y Notice of Action LL k-n }C Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice z' Short Subdivision Agenda otice of Application r. Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit_,. __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds Box 70 - Seattle. WA 98111 Other ' a • Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this I �'� day of )(4Z year 20 01q P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: ' 0 .0 (/1-e6K ' S Project Number: �DtcJ Ob ' Mailer's Signature: Ll 64/0 Person requesting mailing: Y (ae2;(x, k-n }C P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM • 1U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS / /() EDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC 'DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE i DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV PI DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DEV. • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWIIA LIBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY UTIUTIES () QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES CITY AGENCIES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POLICE () FINANCE ( ) PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK OTHER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE () CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT () SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES () CI.TUK\MLA.WA.US.WWW PUBO, NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PETS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant • Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division - SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)• Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS:. Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shore) e Permit Notice o i ecision: Mail to: ithin 8 days o decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department f Ecolo 4 bhorelands Section State Attorney *Applicant •Indian Trib •Other a cies as necess (checked off on attached list). Any • ies of record • send only the staff re • • rt, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) — Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMI's) – Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline – Grading Plan – Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) °Findings (staff report or memo) --SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of ApplicatioiD Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS \CIt1CLIST.DOC • Dept. Of Community Development- City of Tukwila, AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUT_I I. 2 &LC' HEREBY DECLARE THA Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Short Subdivision Agenda Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 1. Mitigated :Determ`natioh :c Significance``] 0 Determi_nati on of Significance;; Notice coping; oti ce of :Appl-;cation Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this': year 2000 Project Name: 1,1_ C11 . Project Number: —001 Mailer's Signature: Person requesting mailing: ` % CI: A P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM ROBBINS PROPERTIES LLC WISEMAN CRAIG BERGSETH JR CHARLES N & 818 SW 142ND ST , PO BOX 16423 DIANA BURIEN WA 98166 SEATTLE WA 98116 ,13409 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 SECURE CAPITAL INVEST LLC PO BOX 25127 SEATTLE WA 98165 WHITE BRADLEY R 13429 43RD AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 ROSS MIKE 13507 43RD AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 POIRIER KONRAD OANNE M 13405 43RD AV TUKWILA W • 8168 SMITH TODD R 8129 HUDSO L SW LAKEWOO A 98498 STETSON JOHN B III 13258 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 MENARD MICHAEL G & BEVERLY JO 13425 43RD AVE S ;TUKWILA WA 98168 SCHUBERT E 13517 43 TUKWI A VE S WA 98168 POIRIER JO E M KONRAD 13405 43 AVE S TUKW A WA 98168 DREAM CATCHER HOMES LLC 13619 MUKILTEO SPEEDWAY D5 LYNNWOOD WA 98087 SCHUBERT E GREG 13517 43RD AVE S !TUKWILA WA 98168 'LEE CARL O '13435 43RD AVE S 'TUKWILA WA 98168 POIRIER KONRAD JOANNE M 13405 43RD AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 SMITH TODD R & RIEKO OHNO 8129 HUDSON PL SW TACOMA WA 98498 KNUDSON GERALD 6402 S 144TH ST 1 TUKWILA WA 98168 DREAM CATCHE OMES LLC KNUDSO GERALD CITY OF KWILA 13619 MUKILTEO PEEDWAY 6402 S 1 4TH ST 1 6200 SO THCENTER BLVD D5 TUKW A WA 98168 TUKW LA WA 98188 LYNNWOOD W 98087 PHAM NGOC -NU THI & NGUYEN M 3829 S 132ND PL TUKWILA WA 98168 MEAGHER LEONARD 13242 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 ROBINSON CURTISS W 13422 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 GRIFFIN JEFFREY M & VERNA S 3833 S 132ND PL TUKWILA WA 98168 CROSSEN LAVERNE 13250 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 GREENE MATTHEW 13243 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 CITY OF TUK LA 6200 SOUTHC NTER BLVD TUKWILA A 98188 CITY OF TUK LA SCANLON DONALD 6200 SOUTH ENTER BLVD 13410 40TH AVE S TUKWILA A 98188 TUKWILA WA 98168 GLICK HAROLD B 9917 2ND AVE S SEATTLE WA 98108 CITY OF TUKWI A , 6200 SOUTHC TER BLVD TUKWILA 98188 REHAL KULBIR SINGH & • DAVINDER 7401 BLACKMON RD 906 COLUMBUS GA 31909 NGUYEN HUNG & HONG TRAN 4202 S 137TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 BARTELS JOHN C & ANDREA E BARTELS 4206 S 137TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 KARZAI SHUGHLA & AHMADI NAZIR M 4218 S 137TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 VANLINDERN VIOLA 15500 1ST AVE S 102 BURIEN WA 98148 PAGEL BYRON BODD 13603 1/2 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 LOONEY WILLIAM A PO BOX 1435 TACOMA WA 98401 PAREZ ROMANA 13602 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 PHAVONG BOUNSON & KHAMPHENG PO BOX 68324 SEATTLE WA 98168 DEANS RAYMOND R 4210 S 137TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 ROBINSON CU W 13422 40T VE S TUK A WA 98168 WILHELM DION & TINA 13247 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 CITY OF TUKWIL 6200 SOUTHC TER BLVD TUKWIL A 98188 PHAVONG BO PO BOX •: 4 SEA E WA 98168 BALBUENA EMMANUEL & IRENE 13608 42ND AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 RIESS PAMELA S & LOYD LEE M 13531 43RD AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 LIM TONG 4214 S 137TH ST TUKWILA WA 98168 NGUYEN JOHN MINH DINH 13255 40TH AVE S TUKWILA WA 98168 May 15, 2006 City of Tukwg Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Comm ; nay Development NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Ryan Larson, Senior Engineer Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: E06 -007 Environmental Review Small Drainage Project -13422 40th Avenue South Dear Ryan: Steve Lancaster, Director Your application for environmental /SEPA review is considered complete effective May 15, 2006 28, 2006 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, please call me. Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed you may obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application that you will post on the board. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. The Notice of Application will also be mailed by the City to all tax payers and residents or businesses within 500 feet of the site. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permit identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits. Sincerely, Rebecca Fox RF Q: \SEPA Small Drainage Projects E06- 007 \COMPLETE.DOCPage 1 of 2 05/16/2006 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 o Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 o Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Memorandum May 4, 2006 To: Rebecca From: Sandra Re: Public Works Small Drainage Project, Southgate Creek I have reviewed the 60% drawings for the proposed project (sheets 8 and 9) and feel that the contractor has adequately provided for mitigation at the site. I do, however, have a few comments, as follows: Sheet 9, planting plan: 1. Recent research has shown that, particularly for planting in restoration sites, planting holes should not be backfilled with compost or other amendments. It is much preferred to install plants in native soils and apply the compost on top of the soil. Alternatively, if the soil quality is such that amendment with organic material is needed, the entire site should be amended and then planted. The construction note and drawings should be modified accordingly. 2. The planting holes should not be any deeper than the depth of the root ball to be planted to prevent settling. 3. Construction Note 3 mentions a detention pond and elevations of 190 -195. This appears to be incorrect. 4. Additional planting notes that should be added: a. The root ball should be inspected before planting. Plants with cracked roots or those that are excessively root bound shall be rejected. The roots shall be loosened and pruned as necessary to remove any circling roots. b. Plants shall be nursery-grown and contractor must have invoices /packing lists on- site. General 5. Temporary irrigation may be needed.depending on when plants are installed. 6. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be needed. 7. A plan for temporary diversion of the stream during construction activities will be needed. TO: Rebecca Fox FROM: Ryan Larson DATE: May 2, 2006 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Small Drainage Project SEPA (E06 -007) Per your request, please find the attached revised construction drawings (5 sets) that contain additional information on the subject proposal. Please let me know as soon as practical the status of this SEPA application so that I can prepare the notice board for posting. 100 90 80 70 60 SD 0 \ EP n, EP EP EP EP EP PK N'IL AC m a PK NAIL \ n1 0°99.86 40TH AVENUES N 30 %00.00 0017.61 36 CMP E 6000.0° o m0 CON; RETAINING n ' n °b E ° 100.00 b WALL 11 8..85' IE 72.2 A EP EP I— GRAV P15; 2• mLD18 72 ALD24 -ALD1 ALLDD15 - A102 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 4 GROUND `b ' s \ AL 20 UrJSTANLE 6V \\ SLIDE AREA I 1.•1111 JAIL°:! \ • i/ O MAPa2 //// / i14(/TTI0 PfiUCE1 60 MA 18 AP15 CONE — — ,, —;� IE SEE IL ou V ROCK DAM 6 , 10 11 12 60 13 14 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION OMITS. ALL ACCESS TO SITE SHALL BE FROM 40TH AVE S. CONSTRUCTION NOTES ® REMOVE FAILING CONCRETE BOX CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT STREAM CHANNEL SEE STREAM CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL, SHEET 2. 02 CONSTRUCT ROCKERY. SEE ROCKERY DETAIL, SHEET 2. Q3 REGRADE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES AT 2:1 MAX SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. ® REGRADE SLOPE AT 3:1 MAX SLOPE. FILL IN EROSION AREAS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SMOOTH CONIINOUS SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. i QS INSTALL 18" CPE SD CULVERT. © CONSTRUCT PIPE END PROTECTION. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. Q7 CONSTRUCT BERM WITH 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPES AND CONSTRUCT OVERFLOW. SEE DETAIL SHEET 2. ® PRESERVE AND PROTECT TREE. 0 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. HECE1/ED CRY OF TUKWQq MAY 0 2 2006 PERMIT CENTER 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ * ENGINEERING +STREETS +WATER• SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked prof eng prof dir field bk no by date MJT 4/06 MJT 4/06 NJD 4/06 MJT 4/06 MIPCM Architecture Landscape Architect. Crvil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 1 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 8 9 ■ file no 0520PPR03.dwg scale N/A date 4/06 EP EP sa PK NAIL EP AC ) N 0099.86 40TH AVENUEiS v / f, 0017 61 36" CMP / o a`� 0;O aP COLIC RETAINING •g,gg` � jE 77.2 10 " WALL 11 / 12 EP AC EP e \ EP A AP1 /. A1018 iv- _13- 1 EPI —�-�'� GR V.� 2 3 7 / _4LD1 / / �- MAPa2 _./ /7 / AL02d - (ALD24 %-- 0' • U . ALD2A�. \ �o — MA i r.�`x� n -� may' :_` AI D15 !' CREEK / .a •���'`'A102:, M©IB "0 5 10 ''c20-"9„, ‘`�40 , \ "60 SCALE IN•. FEET . GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION. 3. PLANT, MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY AS PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 4. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE SPECIES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. PLANT SCHEDULE `1'✓PRUCFT: ;r Af'15 CONC W0 SEF a RUCK DAM 1" BMW CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS TO BE PIT PLANTED AND BACKFILLED WITH COMPOSTED MULCH. 2 PLACE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH ON SIDE SLOPES AND ALL RESTORED AREAS 3 1MLLOW CUTTINGS TO BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF 20 STAKES IN ON SIDE SLOPES OF DETENTION POND, BETWEEN EL. 190 -195, AS SHOWN SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME QTY SIZE REMARKS © O O OROSA O PICEA SITCHENSIS/ SITKA SPRUCE 16 2.5 - 3.5 HT CONTAINER, 10' - 12' OC SPACING TYP. CORNUS STOLONIFERA/ RED OSIER DOGWOOD 55 3' -4' HT. 2 -1 TRANSPLANT, WELL ROOTED RUBUS SPECTABILIS/ SALMONBERRY 19 1 GALLON CONT. ACER CIRCINATUM/ VINE MAPLE 17 4' -5 HT 3-5 CANES, MIN )i° CAL TYP NUTKANA/ NOOTKA ROSE 55 1 GALLON CONT. LONICERA INVOLUCRATA/ BLACK TWNBERRY 20 1 GALLON CONT. LIVE WILLOW STAKES - SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET SALIX LASIANDRA/ PACIFIC WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES. 2' -3' LENGTH 18" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. SALIX SITCHENSIS/ SITKA WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18° 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. CED42 ELEVATION td- �� ;r CONTAINERIZED TREE OR SEEDLING /-- ALIGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN- WITH EXISTING GRADE / /— 2°COMPOSTED MULCH WHERE / / INDICATED NOTE. ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE N 0 W >e BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS 7- TOP ELEVATION — APPROX. EL 190 LIVE WILLOW STAKES AT 18 OC TRI SPACING LIVE STAKE / CONTAINERIZED TREE, SHRUB OR PLUG ,— ALIGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN WITH EXISTING GRADE 2° COMPOSTED MULCH, WHERE INDICATED BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH NOTE: ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE SHRUB, PLUG AND DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS ■ \` BOTTOM ELEVATION - APPROX EL. 183 \"- NATIVE SOIL PREPARE HOLE WITH METAL BAR, DRIVE WILLOW STAKE & TAMP SOIL AROUND STAKE -- CUT BASEL END NEATLY AT ANGLE FOR PLANTING - LIVE STAKE INSTALLATION NTS SECTION REMOVE PORTION OF /' . WILLOW STAKE IF DAMAGED DURING PLACEMENT, REPLACE CUTTINGS THAT SPLIT OR BREAK i \- NATIVE • SOIL LIVE STAKE. 2' TO 3' LENGTH, 1" TO no FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. CUTTINGS AND STAKES MUST BE ALIVE WITH SIDE BRANCHES REMOVED AND BARK INTACT. 2 STAKES SHALL BE 2' -3' IN LENGTH 3. CUT TOP SQUARE OR BLUNT 4. KEEP MOIST AFTER CUTTING, INSTALL WITHIN ONE DAY OF CUTTING (OR PROTECT FROM DEHYDRATION). ern, OF KWILA MAY 0 2 2006 PERMIT CENTER PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked proj eng prof dir field bk no by date xxx 4/06 xxx 4/06 NJD 4/06 MJT 4/06 Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 9 9 file no 0520LPN Ldwg scale N/A date 4/06 / EP EP EP EP EP EP 40TH AVENUES EP AC 12 EP 13. _..: P 1,/W 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 100 90 80 70 60 100 90 80 10 11 12 13 14 GENERAL NOTES 1. AU. WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ALL ACCESS TO SITE SHALL BE FROM 40TH AVE S. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 REMOVE FAIUNG CONCRETE BOX CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT STREAM CHANNEL SEE STREAM CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 CONSTRUCT ROCKERY. SEE ROCKERY DETAIL, SHEET 2. Q REGRADE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES AT 2:1 MAX SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. ® REGRADE SLOPE AT 3:1 MAX SLOPE. FILL IN EROSION AREAS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SMOOTH CONTINOUS SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. QS INSTALL 18' CPE SD CULVERT. © CONSTRUCT PIPE END PROTECTION. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. 07 CONSTRUCT BERM WITH 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPES AND CONSTRUCT OVERFLOW. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. ® PRESERVE AND PROTECT TREE. 09 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. K CEIVED err ( OF TUKWU' MAY 022006 PERMIT O:-EN E a ww 1908 n PUBLIC' WORKS DEPT_ *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked Prol eng prof dir field bk no by MJT MJT NJD MJT date 4/06 4/06 4/06 4/06 ITEEPCM Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 8 9 file no 052OPPRO3.dw. scale N/A date 4/06 EP EP AC EP — 10 11 eP EP EP 40TH AVENUE S 12 EP "P I AC EP EP 13 EP 0 5 10 20 40 60 ._ SCALE IN FEET GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION. 3. PLANT, MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY AS PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 4. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE SPECIES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. PLANT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS TO BE PIT PLANTED AND BACKFILLED WITH COMPOSTED MULCH. 2. PLACE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH ON SIDE SLOPES AND ALL RESTORED AREAS 3. WILLOW CUTTINGS TO BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF 20 STAKES IN ON SIDE SLOPES OF DETENTION POND, BETWEEN EL 190 -195, AS SHOWN SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME QTY SIZE REMARKS © OO O OROSA O PICEA SITCHENSIS/ SITKA SPRUCE 16 2.5' — 3.5' HT CONTAINER, 10' — 12' OC SPACING TYP. CORNUS STOLONIFERA/ RED OSIER DOGWOOD 55 3' -4' HT. 2 -1 TRANSPLANT, WELL ROOTED RUBUS SPECTABIUS/ SALMONBERRY 19 1 GALLON CONT. ACER CIRCINATUM/ VINE MAPLE 17 4' -5 HT. 3-5 CANES, MIN it CAL TYP NUTKANA/ NOOTKA ROSE 55 1 GALLON CONT. LONICERA INVOLUCRATA/ BLACK TWINBERRY 20 1 GALLON CONT. LIVE WILLOW STAKES — SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET SALIX LASIANDRA/ PACIFIC WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2 -3' LENGTH 18' 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. SAUX SITCHENSIS/ SITKA WILLOW 120 UVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. AC J )_LEVA1ION NOTE: ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE CONTAINERIZED TREE OR SEEDUNG AUGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN pp WITH EXISTING GRADE Op IN 2"COMPOSTED DICATED MULCH WHERE e� BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS UVE STAKE TOP ELEVATION — APPROX. EL 190 UVE WILLOW STAKES AT 18" OC TRI SPACING Ar AOPY PREPARE HOLE WITH j METAL BAR, DRIVE WILLOW STAKE & TAMP SOIL AROUND STAKE CUT BASEL END NEATLY AT ANGLE FOR PLANTING BOTTOM ELEVATION — APPROX EL 183 NATIVE SOIL LIVE STAKE INSTALLATION NTS REMOVE PORTION OF WILLOW STAKE IF DAMAGED DURING PLACEMENT, REPLACE CUTTINGS THAT SPUT OR BREAK AOr CONTAINERIZED TREE, SHRUB OR PLUG ALIGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN WITH EXISTING GRADE 2 COMPOSTED MULCH, WHERE INDICATED BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH NOTE: ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE SHRUB, PLUG AND DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS 90' NATIVE SOIL UVE STAKE, 2' TO 3' LENGTH, 1" TO 2"I SECTION FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. CUTTINGS AND STAKES MUST BE AUVE WITH SIDE BRANCHES REMOVED AND BARK INTACT. 2. STAKES SHALL BE 2' -3' IN LENGTH 3. CUT TOP SQUARE OR BLUNT 4. KEEP MOIST AFTER CUTTING, INSTALL WITHIN ONE DAY OF CUTTING (OR PROTECT FROM DEHYDRATION). RECEIVED rw o i rUKwItA M AI 0 2 2006 PERmiT CE.NTE7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked prof eng prof dir field bk no by date xxx 4/06 xxx 4/06 NJD 4/06 MJT 4/06 M. Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK date revisions 9 J 9 file no 05201PN01.dwp scale N/A date 4/06 REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT AND RESTORE STREAM CHANNEL AC FLOwuNE 12* cup IE 90.0' INSTALL 18" OVERFLOW'CULVERT CONSRUCT EARTHEN BERM ACR6SS ACCESS ROAD TO PREVENT OVERFLOW GOING TOWARD EXISTNG RESIDENCE 1$1LOc Roc DA I &PO D2 ^pvcLAE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING. STREETS •WATER • SEWER • BUILDING • Architecture Lance Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design SEPA SUBMITTAL 2006 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM SITE I SOUTHGATE CREEK file BO SEPA- ROBOJSONS scale N/A date 3/05 / EP SD / AC 2 m° CONC RETAINING / ALL 11 EP o EP PK NAIL EP 0099.86 0017 61 b' 36' CMP 89.85' 14 E 72.2 40TH AVENUE)S / 12 EP AC EP 9e- ; •oX IE —T•,S LD1 Apt #Ar MAI 1 - \\ \ �" CREEK 1 // \\ \ 9 v.. •pike - `'• -�-- MAP36'— 8 86 E P'L tiO w 1 � 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET 100 90 80 70 8 78 G}MAP20 'J— GROUND rJ UNSTABLE )M ' AL 120 SLIDE AREA ALDI8 ��Ato' \'\\ A1AP15 ■ ALD2 �i;PRUCEI 0 60 Al ,..X.:,, 11) , _- - \\ IC 6,i CONC • \ \� t �AP15 :ONE SEE ROCK DAM CE042 18" 100 .. .. .. ........ ... ... .. .. .. .. ...... . ... 90 80 70 10 11 12 13 14 60 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION UMITS. ALL ACCESS TO SITE SHALL BE FROM 40TH AVE S. CONSTRUCTION NOTES Q1 REMOVE FAILING CONCRETE BOX CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT STREAM CHANNEL SEE STREAM CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 CONSTRUCT ROCKERY. SEE ROCKERY DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 REGRADE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES AT 2:1 MAX SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. 0 REGRADE SLOPE AT 3:1 MAX SLOPE. FILL IN EROSION AREAS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SMOOTH CONTINOUS SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. 0 INSTALL 18" CPE SD CULVERT. 0 CONSTRUCT PIPE END PROTECTION. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 CONSTRUCT BERM WITH 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPES AND CONSTRUCT OVERFLOW. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 PRESERVE AND PROTECT TREE. 0 CONSTRUCTION UMITS. AECEIVED art of 1 NKWIA MAY 0 2 2006 RUIMIT C=ENTER PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked Droleng by MJT MJT NJD MJT date 4/06 4/06 4/06 4/06 Pro' dir field bk no Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 8 9 file no 0520PPR03.dwg scale N/A date 4/06 EP EP I U OV Q� AC CONC RETAINING / WALL Tl .f s EP PK NAII N 0099.86 Em30017.61 89.85' 36" CMP Tro° j22 EP 40TH AVENUES n ^V _12 1 , C t 13 EP AC EP EP 2-3".:744-__------ ' L. Nom !__ OX�ULA+fRT \ 1E7. i s �� 82 -1C-72 N — AP ao - ---e -- klkPth At-D--,---1 LDI �AP2�0= ff?P ,- j�-i -- 78 � CREEK L /i /,/ AiAt 1 ,0, 7, EDGE F / P1 • \b /l4AP15' / 0117Y� PiV 4 , ID18 3 ALD24 ALD24 72 D W /- 0 0 C> A1415 APIA ��� - =�_. �� ► 84 L., .7€2 0fl • P15 CONC i W o SEER >aa w� c o so, GROUND ; \ \ UNSTABLE 0 5 10 'e 20 >a N 40 N \ 60 SCALE IN.FEET. ' ` \ LDA& s46,...„., AL a20 SLIDE AREA \ ALaa, GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION. 3. PLANT, MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY AS PER SPEIAL PROVISIONS. 4. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE SPECIES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. PLANT SCHEDULE ROCK DAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS TO BE PIT PLANTED AND BACKFILLED WITH COMPOSTED MULCH. 2 PLACE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH ON SIDE SLOPES AND ALL RESTORED AREAS 3 WILLOW CUTTINGS TO BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF 20 STAKES IN ON SIDE SLOPES OF DETENTION POND, BETWEEN EL. 190 -195, AS SHOWN SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME QTY SIZE REMARKS © OO O OROSA OLONICERA PICEA SITCHENSIS/ SITKA SPRUCE 16 2.5' - 3.5' HT CONTAINER, 10' - 12' OC SPACING TYP. CORNUS STOLONIFERA/ RED OSIER DOGWOOD 55 3' -4' HT. 2 -1 TRANSPLANT, WELL ROOTED RUBUS SPECTABILIS/ SALMONBERRY 19 1 GALLON CONT. ACER CIRCINATUM/ VINE MAPLE 17 4' -5' HE 3-5 CANES, MIN h- CAL TYP NUTKANA/ NOOTKA ROSE 55 1 GALLON CONT. INVOLUCRATA/ BLACK TWINBERRY 20 1 GALLON CONT. LIVE WILLOW STAKES - SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET SALIX LASIANDRA/ PACIFIC WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. SALIX SITCHENSIS/ SITKA WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. ELEVATION /•\. ' \ ' ' '. ' ' '' ' \ • \-- BACKFILL WITH '/ COMPOSTED MULCH CONTAINERIZED TREE OR SEEDLING AUGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN pG WITH EXISTING GRADE 7 2-COMPOSTED MULCH WHERE INDICATED NOTE. ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS LIVE STAKE -\ TOP ELEVATION - APPROX. EL 190 LIVE WILLOW STAKES AT 18" OC TRI SPACING BOTTOM ELEVATION - APPROX EL 183 0% CONTAINERIZED TREE, SHRUB OR PLUG ALIGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN WITH EXISTING GRADE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH, WHERE INDICATED BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH NOTE ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE SHRUB, PLUG AND DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS \ NATIVE 90' ., PREPARE HOLE WITH SOIL i \. METAL BAR, ERNE WILLOW STAKE &RAMP � ,, # SOIL AROUND STAKE y, ,), CUT BASEL END NEATLY AT ANGLE \ FOR PLANTING \�9 \1` LIVE STAKE INSTALLATION NTS SECTION REMOVE PORTION OF WILLOW STAKE IF DAMAGED DURING PLACEMENT, REPLACE CUTTINGS THAT SPLIT OR BREAK NATIVE SOIL UVE STAKE, 2' TO 3' LENGTH, 1" TO 2 "0 FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. CUTTINGS AND STAKES MUST BE ALIVE WITH SIDE BRANCHES REMOVED AND BARK INTACT. 2. STAKES SHALL BE 2' -3' IN LENGTH 3. CUT TOP SQUARE OR BLUNT 4. KEEP MOIST AFTER CUTTING, INSTALL WITHIN ONE DAY OF CUTTING (OR PROTECT FROM DEHYDRATION). HICSIVEZ MAY 0 2 2006 PERMIT CENTER z 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ * ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * by designed drawn checked prof eng prof dir field bk no XXX XXX NJD MJT date 4/06 4/06 4/06 4/06 LEMCM Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions J 9 9 file no 0520LPN01.dwg scale N/A date 4/06 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION April 12, 2006 TO: Ryan Larson, Public Works FROM: Rebecca Fox, Tukwila Department of Community Development RE: E06 -007 Small Drainage Projects —13422 40th Ave., S. We have reviewed Public Works' application for SEPA review (File #E06 -007) and have found it to be incomplete. In order to complete the application, we will need additional information on the project itself, and more specifics on how it will be carried out. In order to get this information, we recommend that you and Sandra Whiting, DCD Urban Environmentalist, visit the site together. The visit will enable Sandra to learn more about the project, and assess the likely environmental impacts. This information will then need to be prepared in written form and added to the checklist. Once the site visit has taken place, and we have received additional information about the project, its probable impacts and recommendations on the probable impacts of the project, we will re- review the file for completeness. We recognize the need to keep the project moving, and will notify you whether the application is complete within 14 days after receiving additional information. Please note that I will be out of the office between April 13 and April 24, 2006.. In my absence, please contact Sandra Whiting or Jack Pace about the project. Q: \SEPA Small Drainage Projects E06- 007 \NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION.doc 04/12/2006 12:05:00 PM - 1 - 11 lnn - T..L..1 :1,1 LVochinnrnn OR1RR e Ahnno• 20/1- d ?1 -7h70 • Far- 2nh- 131 -3665 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 =3665 E -mail: tukplan(&,,ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL RECEIVEDREVIEW ►MAR 2 9 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Zap L- £ &9 /N96L LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. ILS4Z2- 901% 41/f S. rr/,(�l/i6.9 , c✓r1 P8/(o$ ��iiexL 73/OOO /cs- Quarter: lVW Section: /S Township: ZQ Range: y (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, an • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: RyAAJ L4,SOA/ Address: (&)O 'GA. it� /l U /.Eii,9.1a To( /2,1 149 R& /8B - .)S7' Phone: (206) '3/-Y,5-(e FAX: 6W6) (3/ -3t63- E -mail: L ?f -•' Cnr l(/ /a/ /G4. l✓3.1/.5 Signature: 1. /�i % /,� Date: /�3/ , � G:W PPHAMLANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 09/11/03 FOR STAFF USE ONLY SIERRA TYPE P -SEPA Planner: E. x File Number: ` 0 6, 2 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: 5 ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Zap L- £ &9 /N96L LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. ILS4Z2- 901% 41/f S. rr/,(�l/i6.9 , c✓r1 P8/(o$ ��iiexL 73/OOO /cs- Quarter: lVW Section: /S Township: ZQ Range: y (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, an • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: RyAAJ L4,SOA/ Address: (&)O 'GA. it� /l U /.Eii,9.1a To( /2,1 149 R& /8B - .)S7' Phone: (206) '3/-Y,5-(e FAX: 6W6) (3/ -3t63- E -mail: L ?f -•' Cnr l(/ /a/ /G4. l✓3.1/.5 Signature: 1. /�i % /,� Date: /�3/ , � G:W PPHAMLANDUSE.APP SEPAAPP.DOC, 09/11/03 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Check, items submitted : with application ... Information Required May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of Public Works and Planning ,, - . . ...:. APPLICATION MATERIALS: v 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, State Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of any plans submitted reduced to 8 1/2" by 11". One complete set of PMTs of the final drawing set will be required prior to final approval. /4 4. Application Fee $500. f/ ,/j/pf9 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA Review. ( 14/DfW5) PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: 6. Mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Number of sets depends on the notice requirements of the underlying permit, check with Planning Staff. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Materials section). v/ 7. King County Assessor's map(s) that shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot (if mailing labels are required). 8. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that the application is complete (see Public Notice Materials section). PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: c/".- Vicinity Map with site location. 10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies as needed prepared per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45), the Guidance for Preparation of Sensitive Areas Special Studies for Wetlands and Watercourses and /or Geotechnical Report Guidelines (Public Works Department Bulletin B4). 11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". Q \FORMS\Revised Forms - SAO Related \SEPA Application.DOC, 08 /04/05 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukolari a,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:' 1. • I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at . for the purpose of application reviQv, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any Toss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application withc :jt refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Applictttion Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City inforination request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. • EXECUTED at (city), (state), on (Print Name) (Address) (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on ' "/.9 e /%,/ no /7 Preliminary Environmental Checklist WAC 197 -11 -960 Environmental Checklist RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proposed Project: 2006 Small Drainage Projects 2. Name of Applicant: City of Tukwila, Public Works Department 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -0179 Contact: Ryan Larson, P.E. 4. Date checklist prepared: March 15, 2006 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the project will be advertised for construction in April /May 2006. Construction will begin in June 2006 and should be completed within 90 to 120 calendar days. The exact construction schedule will be determined as the design and permitting processes are finalized. All work will be completed within the 1 WDFW window for work below the ordinary high water mark, typically June 15 to September 15. 7. Plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal: No future expansion is planned 8. Environmental information that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: None known. 9. Applications that are pending for governmental approval of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by the proposal: None known. 10. List of governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for the proposal: The following permits are anticipated: Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 11. Brief, complete description of the proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site: This proposal consists of one (1) project location, which has been identified by citizen complaints and City of Tukwila public works and maintenance staff as highest priority based on maintenance needs, public nuisance, and potential damage to adjacent properties. The project is briefly described below and identified on the attached plan. Southgate Creek Culvert Replacement: Remove existing culvert located directly downstream of 40t" Ave South and restore to natural stream channel. Install 24" overflow culvert at maintenance access upstream of 13422 40th Ave S driveway and install earthen berm across maintenance access. See attached plan for further detail. 12. Location of the proposal, including the street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known; a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available: The project sites are located within the City of Tukwila at the street locations noted above. A location map is attached. 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate slope percentage)? 30% at the upstream end of the project, but generally less than that throughout the rest of the site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? Specify the classification of agricultural soils and note any prime farmland. Glacial till soils. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The existing culvert embankment proposed for removal is actively eroding into the creek. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The purpose of excavation is to remove the existing embankment, which is actively eroding into the creek. In addition, an earthen berm will be placed to the adjacent to the channel to prevent overflow into an adjacent resident. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. g. Yes, approximately 0.5 acres will be cleared and graded for this project. Construction will be completed during the dry, late summer season using appropriate erosion control best management practices and minimizing disturbed areas. Temporary bypasses will be installed to route surface flows, if any, around the active construction site. about what percentage of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 3 No new impervious surface is proposed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any. Erosion and sedimentation will be controlled through the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) as described in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, and in accordance with City of Tukwila requirements. Disturbed areas will be restored to match existing conditions, which may consist hydro- seeding disturbed areas, installation of erosion control fabric, planting shrubs, and /or planting trees. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust. Automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? Generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Minor dust and internal combustion engine emissions will be in the air only during construction. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: Best management practices will be implemented during construction activities to reduce and control dust and air emissions. These practices may include covering soil stockpiles, sweeping or washing paved surfaces, minimizing exposed areas, and using construction machinery equipped with emission control devices. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site, including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The project is located along Southgate Creek, which flows to the Duwamish River. 4 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes the site is located within described water, see attached plans. 3) Estimate the amount of dredge and fill material that would be removed from or placed in surface water or wetlands, and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Excavation for culvert/embankment removal is 400 cubic yards. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities, if known. Will require temporary diversion of creek flows around the project area. Late summer flows are minor and will be accomplished by means of a sandbag dam and portable centrifugal pump placed upstream of the culvert removal. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The proposal does not involve the discharge of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe any waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources (e. g., domestic sewage, industrial, agricultural, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served, or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 5 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method(s) of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Will this runoff water be discharged or flow into surface waters or ground water? If so, describe. The Project is a maintenance repair and upgrades of the existing City of Tukwila drainage system. No modifications to current collection and disposal of runoff will occur. 2) Could waste materials or toxic materials enter ground or surface waters during or as a result of this proposal? If yes, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water impacts, if any: Appropriate BMPs will be installed to prevent sediment transport into existing drainage courses and conveyance systems. 4. PLANTS a. Underline types of vegetation found on the site: b. x deciduous trees: other x conifer trees: x shrubs: other wet soil plants: other water plants: _x_ other types of vegetation: alder, maple, birch, black cottonwood, fir, cedar, pine, other blackberry, salmonberry, vine maple, buttercup, rushes, sedge, grasses, water lily, milfoil, eelgrass, other grasses, lawn, ivy. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 0.5 acres will be disturbed by construction. Vegetation to be removed consists primarily of non - native grass species and blackberry. c. List threatened or endangered species or critical habitat known to be on or near the site: No threatened or endangered species are known to occur on or near the sites. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 6 All disturbed areas will be hydroseeded following construction. 5. ANIMALS a. Underline any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site: x invertebrates: fish: amphibians: reptiles: x birds: x mammals: insects, mollusks, other salmon, trout, bass, herring, shellfish, other frogs, salamanders, toads, other snakes, lizards, turtles, other songbirds, owls, hawks, eagles, heron, other deer, bear, elk, beaver, rabbits, rodents, other b. List any threatened or endangered species or critical habitat known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered species known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, describe. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. N/A 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The completed project will not require any energy. b. Would the project affect the use (potential or actual) of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. None. 7 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals or hazardous wastes, risk of explosion or fire that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Yes, accidental fuel or oil spills from the heavy equipment could occur during construction. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Repairs and refueling of construction equipment would be done away from the water courses and storm conveyance facilities. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect the project (e.g., traffic, heavy equipment, operation, industrial, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by, or associated with the project, on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example, traffic, construction, operation, other)? State what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noise impacts from construction operations are anticipated during work hours (typically 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM) for the duration of construction. No long -term impacts are anticipated. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction equipment will be equipped with mufflers and all operations will be in accordance with City of Tukwila noise ordinances. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project is within City right of way in residential neighborhoods, and on one privately owned parcel. 8 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. A nearby single family residence. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? City right of way and residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not known. g. What is the current shoreline master program designation of the site, if any? Not a designated shoreline. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify. Not known. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. I. Proposed measures to ensure the project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans in the area. Does not apply. 9 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many housing units would the project provide, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low income housing. None. b. Approximately how many housing units would be eliminated, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Does not apply. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. 10 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None. 12. RECREATION a. What designated or informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City Park Property b. Would the project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation including any recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any sites, structures or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or near to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historical, archaeological, scientific or cultural artifacts of importance known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Does not apply. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project is located adjacent to 40th Avenue South within the City of Tukwila. 11 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets or improvements to existing roads or streets (not including driveways)? If so, generally describe, and indicate whether public or private. No. e. Will the project use (or be in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated as a result of the project? Indicate when peak traffic would occur, if known. Does not apply. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Does not apply. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (e.g., fire and police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES 12 a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural qas, water, telephone, refuse service, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. What utility service will be needed by the project? Who (which utility) will provide the service, and what utility construction will be required on or in the immediate vicinity of the site? None. 13 C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that thJad ageyfty is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: 'lei Date submitted: 3/g/06. The following checked items are included with the Checklist: X Vicinity Map X Project Plans KPG, Inc. 0520 - Sepa.doc 3/24/06 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT% •ENGINEERING.STREETS •WATER.SEWER BUILOING• e1"PHIP BIB "P6IMPRI6A► • Architecture • Landscape Architecture • �£ Engineering 2006 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM SEPA SUBMITTAL VICINITY MAP Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06; Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 C Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly . mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO,- Continue to Question 4 -0 (YE3 - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processii.g or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. 513 Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2006 COMMurar; r' DEVELOPMENT Lity of l ulacwila LSA Screening UtiecKllst Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of •transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. P)se circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -2 Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and /or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and _does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to .. construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for .each •No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of "hy trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height. of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 I'E- Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Ltty of 1 uicunta ESA Screening Checklist NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green /Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This ::-,includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 (YE -§,- Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES.,-)Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO.- Continue to Question 3 -7 E - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) %Y1��Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) EP /EP \EP 1 1 )ACy o r0 O" 9P COIC REIAINII1G WALL 11 EP PK NAIL 0099.86 0017.61 89.85' 1z Z_ to 36' CMP IE 121-7 -6 - -/ --- - EP EP 40TH AVENUES EP AC \ EP ny W : —13— _--_ '' 'L�VE?tT �, s2 — —'r' T7 Y C � at�wf%i��'���•�>3taL�i3 T+LDi.>�AP2 Mme( i ▪ 3 ' �I4 ! -� l0>17 Phi P }. 4 /_ 8 3 Di ----- -,�_ 70 — — —J 1 024 _1L01F AI n24 y ���. "� • A1D15 ■ AL D2 18 /-- EDGE F t� 7! , ''... �ic3 614.1% , JaP1 __ - / CREEK /L � f:L.'03 1, - .4..., � ` - --� `6 -„ _ 84= "µms 72 J tl - GROUND - - -", �e \ 'Q UNSTABI F 0 5 10 a20 ` 40 \ 6D C'A Di81 \ \ AL 2D SLIDE AREA \ SCALE N.FEE �\ \\ `�� I ��AIEDm T. \\\ I \\) AP15 CLNC GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION. 3. PLANT, MAINTAIN AND WARRANTY AS PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 4. DO NOT SUBSTITUTE SPECIES WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. PLANT SCHEDULE ROCK DAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL PLANTS TO BE PIT PLANTED AND BACKFILLED WITH COMPOSTED MULCH. 2. PLACE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH ON SIDE SLOPES AND ALL RESTORED AREAS 3. WILLOW CUTTINGS TO BE PLANTED IN GROUPS OF 20 STAKES IN ON SIDE SLOPES OF DETENTION POND, BETWEEN EL 190 -195, AS SHOWN SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME/ COMMON NAME QTY SIZE REMARKS © O O OROSA OLONICERA PICEA SITCHENSIS/ SITKA SPRUCE 16 2.5' - 3.5' HT CONTAINER, 10' - 12' OC SPACING TYP. CORNUS STOLONIFERA/ RED OSIER DOGWOOD 55 3' -4' HT. 2 -1 TRANSPLANT, WELL ROOTED RUBUS SPECTABIUS/ SALMONBERRY 19 1 GALLON CONT. ACER CIRCINATUM/ VINE MAPLE 17 4' -5' HT. 3 -5 CANES, MIN N. CAL TYP NUTKANA/ NOOTKA ROSE 55 1 GALLON CONT. INVOLUCRATA/ BLACK TWINBERRY 20 1 GALLON CONT. UVE WILLOW STAKES - SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET SAUX LASIANDRA/ PACIFIC MALLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18" O.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. SAUX SITCHENSIS/ SITKA WILLOW 120 LIVE STAKES, 2' -3' LENGTH 18" 0.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING TYP. ELEVATION /\ BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH CONTAINERIZED TREE OR SEEDUNG CITY OF TUKWLLA MAY 0 2 2006 PST CENTER AUGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN; WITH EXISTING GRADE 0� 2 "COMPOSTED MULCH WHERE ^� INDICATED NOTE ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS TOP ELEVATION - APPROX. EL 19D LIVE WILLOW STAKES AT 18" OC TRI SPACING LIVE STAKE \` NATIVE SOIL PREPARE HOLE WITH METAL BAR, DRIVE WILLOW STAKE & TAMP SOIL AROUND STAKE CUT BASEL END NEATLY AT ANGLE FOR PLANTING BOTTOM ELEVATION - APPROX EL. 183 s CONTAINERIZED TREE, SHRUB OR PLUG ALIGN TOP OF ROOT CROWN WITH EXISTING GRADE 2" COMPOSTED MULCH, WHERE INDICATED / BACKFILL WITH COMPOSTED MULCH NOTE ON SLOPES PLANTS TO BE PLANTED UPRIGHT & NOT PERPENDICULAR TO SLOPE SHRUB, PLUG AND DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS �.— REMOVE PORTION OF WLLOW STAKE IF DAMAGED DURING N. \ , ^; PLACEMENT, REPLACE CUTTINGS THAT SPLIT OR BREAK LIVE STAKE INSTALLATION NTS SECTION NATIVE SOIL / UVE STAKE, 2' TO 3' LENGTH, 1" TO 2 "0 FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. CUTTINGS AND STAKES MUST BE ALIVE WITH SIDE BRANCHES REMOVED AND BARK INTACT. 2 STAKES SHALL BE 2' -3' IN LENGTH 3 CUT TOP SOUARE OR BLUNT 4. KEEP MOIST AFTER CUTTING, INSTALL WHIN ONE DAY OF CUTTING (OR PROTECT FROM DEHYDRATION). PUBLIC' WORKS DEPT_ * ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER *S EWER ►BUILDING * designed drawn checked prof eng prof dir field bk no by date xxx 4/06 xxx 4/06 NJD 4/06 MJT 4/06 Architecture Larvlw ArchitecWre Civil E gincering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 9 1 } F V J 9 ■ file no 0520LPNm.dwg scale N/A date 4/06 / — — SD EP EP EP EP 1 1 N Jo / J PK N IL AC N 30 %00.00 E r000.00 2 o 4' w° '4 CONC RETAINING OD.00' ` 10 WALL if EP 0 PK NAIL N .*099.86 El, 0017.61 89.85' EP EP E° 40T\ \ H AVEN `S 0 36 CMP . Z IE 7 / 12 m Q �, K) — — o w =13 AC EP 90 EONC�X _96 ' iE 7. ) S �� •`` e2 1E 7 L� eo--r AL01 O Ar �.� LD1 MAP2 MA 1 /i► \� 7e EDGE F i // �. v CREEK // MAP36 o -�jy1 )- /��.� 86 ` 84 "i ALD18 3 .— - ' - --`� ALD31 lA D24 ..ALD1 Ci . Ao • • G \� )\\' 12 v> F20 GROUND !�UNSTABLE AL�20 SLIDE AREA ldAP1a `\ ALD2u • 0 5 10 20 40 60 \\\ SCALE IN FEET 100 90 80 70 ALD2 �V PRUCEI AP15 CONC IE SEE ROCK DAM ig. -��' CCU4 ^, 60 . 10 11 12 100 90 80 70 60 13 14 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE MUST BE COMPLETED BETWEEN JUNE 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 INCLUDING ALL RESTORATION. 2. ALL WORK ON THIS SITE SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ALL ACCESS TO SITE SHALL BE FROM 40TH AVE S. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 REMOVE FAILING CONCRETE BOX CULVERT AND CONSTRUCT STREAM CHANNEL SEE STREAM CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL, SHEET 2. 20 CONSTRUCT ROCKERY. SEE ROCKERY DETAIL, SHEET 2. 0 REGRADE CHANNEL SIDE SLOPES AT 2:1 MAX SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. 0 REGRADE SLOPE AT 3:1 MAX SLOPE. FILL IN EROSION AREAS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SMOOTH CONTINOUS SLOPE. SEE SHEET 9 FOR PLANTING PLAN. QS INSTALL 16* CPE SD CULVERT. © CONSTRUCT PIPE END PROTECTION. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. 70 CONSTRUCT BERM WITH 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPES AND CONSTRUCT OVERFLOW. SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2. PRESERVE AND PROTECT TREE. 0 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. 1908 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ *ENGINEERING *STREETS *WATER* SEWER *BUILDING * designed drawn checked proieng prol dir field bk no by MJT MJT NJD MJT date 4/06 4/06 4/06 4/06 Architecture Landscape Architecture Civil Engineering Urban Design 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL 2006 OUTFALL REPAIR PROGRAM SITE NO 6 SOUTHGATE CREEK no date revisions 8 9 file no 0520PPR03.dwg scale N/A date 4/06 LC- REMOVE EXISTING CULVERT AND RESTORE STREAM CHANNEL EP AC F10µtiNE *e IE 722' e 12" cup lE 30.0' do AC ftONUNE ' ORAV. D/w MAPS MAPCO RiiCE12 62 60 X2.5'H 4UtVERT IE 54.3'. S SEE Np6 INSTALL 18" OVERFLOW CULVERT CONSRUCT EARTHEN BERM ACROSS ACCESS ROAD TO PREVENT OVERFLOW GOING TOWARD DOSING RESIDENCE i8- LOG ROQ( DAAfsie & TAci 30302 60 L 30/58.5.4 48 DIREE26 DTREE3 PUBLIC' WORKS DEPT_ ENGINEERING * STREETS *WATER* SEWER * BUILDING * desiped drawn checked In1eni Pre' dr riJd bk co date 3/05 3/05 3/05 3/05 Architecture iandscepe Architecture ciao mpoeemy Urban Design SEPA SUBMITTAL 1- is' LOG ROgf DA41 EXPOgO 2' P: t►NE 2006 SMALL DRAINAGE PROGRAM SITE I SOUTHGATE CREEK date revisions file 110 SEPA- R00D50NS Beak' N/A date 3/05 -if eiki.i.c,44, ,..::: t:: 1 litl1"„1,11# 1 :710 ..' x # o' sr): t,7; 32 16 ■ 1.**,': 1Q1 1 32 Li J4 8 23'1311:%' ;qii P V,,t4 ti I 413326'' ,,1 3 10 +12 1116 *1311-3 44116'ke' i3'U6.4 13431 3 61 123/ Imagery Copyright@ 2008 ' 131232 45, t 3 (-:$.2, 113 1,45 1'3 1313? 13(41, • ' 13/48 qtr- fq4 Scale: 1" = 440 ' DRAINAGE PROJECT N CityGIS5 Copyright 1g1 2004, All F4 gfits Reserved The information contained herein i s the proprietary property of the contributors supplied under license and may not be reproduced except as licensed by Didtal Map Products 13422 40th Avenue S. Print Map Page King County Home News Services Parcel Map and Data Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 7340601005 ROBINSON CURTISS W ETUX The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." Comments King County 1 GIS Center' News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details, Search Page 1 of 1 http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 05/17/2006 Print Map Page King County • Home News Services Parcel Map and Data Parcel Number 7340601001 Address 13422 40TH AV S Zipcode 98168 Taxpayer ROBINSON CURTISS W ETUX The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." Comments King County 1 GIS Center I News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Search Page 1 of 1 http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 05/17/2006 Page 1 of 1 ;4440. ,„ tl,to k • ImArr...vtry. Copyright° 2006 RECEIVED MO, '_(! 1US http://maps.digitalmapeentral.com/TEMP MS U2A/gold l'NFI 3737459 114296531506... 03/21/2006 Page 1 01' I hnagen) Copynght0 2006 A Scale: L" = 209 ' i N CityGIS5 G3pyrigtt ® 2004, A.II F6s#its Reserved The information contained herein isthe proprietary Frcperty cf the contributors- supplied under license and may not be reproduced except as licerred by Cjjtal Map Products http : / /maps.digitalmapcentral.com/ production /City(iISS /CityGIS5 5.17.2 /index.html 06/07/2006 Page 101 Imagery Copyright@ 2006 Scale: t" = 209 ' N CityGIS5 Copyright 2004, All Flights Reserved The infcrmation contained herein isthe proprietary prcperty of the ccritnbJtcrs supplied under license and may not be reproduced except as licensed by Cfgtal Map Products http : / /maps.digitalmapcentral.com /production /City(iI S5 /Cit_yGI S5 S. 17.2 /index.html 06/07/2006