Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E07-002 - MACVEIGH BRUCE - SINGH 6 LOT SHORT PLATKAMAL SINGH 6 -LOT SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT INTO SIX LOTS & ACCESS ROAD WITH SIDEWALKS 15415 65T" AVE S. E07 -002 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION To: Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. Kamal Jit Singh, Owner State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor PROJECT: Kamal Singh 6 -lot Short Plat FILE NUMBERS: E07 -002, L07 -014 ASSOCIATED FILES: D07 -201, PRE06 -029 APPLICANT: Bruce MacVeigh, P.E. REQUEST: Subdivision of one lot into six lots, including an access road with sidewalks on the north and south sides and a fire turnaround. LOCATION: 15415 65th Ave S, on the west side of 65th Ave S north of Southcenter Blvd. This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non - significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit application. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Jaimie Reavis, who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3659 for further information. The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). JR H: \Short Plats\Singh\E07- 002SEPA_NOD.DOC Page 1 of 1 05/19/2008 1:18:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax 7nh- 4V -UM" File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite # 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206- 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E07 -002 03/06/2007 05/23/2008 APPROVED Applicant: BRUCE S. MACVEIGH PE Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: 6 -lot short plat Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township /Range: 1541565AVSTUKW 3597000321 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11 -340(2). Comments must be submitted by �d' t° /2_00 r . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. \:! Jack Pace, ' esponsible Official City of a 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS -4/07 E07 -002 Printed: 05 -23 -2008 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E07 -002 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal is to subdivide one lot into six lots for construction of six new single - family homes. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Kamal Singh 6 -Lot Short Plat Applicant: Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. Location: The site address is 15415 65th Ave S, north of Southcenter Blvd on the west side of 65th Ave S. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) District The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. SEPA Checklist and ESA screening checklist dated March 2, 2007. 2. Civil drawing (dated 2/28/08) and Landscape, Tree Retention and Tree Replacement Plan (dated 3/06/07) prepared by Bruce S. MacVeigh and Richard Vaisvila, P.E., and Preliminary Short Plat survey with updated tree survey (dated 1/06/08) and Topographical Survey (dated 3/06/08) prepared by Richard Vaisvila. 3. Geotechnical report prepared by Bruce S. MacVeigh, dated May 8, 2008. NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, Phone: 206 - 431 -3659. JR H: \Short Plats\Singh\E07 -002 Singh Short Plat.doc Page 1 of 5 05/13/2008 4:17 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 4.31 -.7h,S III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197 -11 -800. IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The proposal is to subdivide one lot into six lots for development of six single - family homes. A 20 foot wide private street, including a Fire Department turnaround, will be constructed to provide access to the new lots. A five foot sidewalk will be constructed on the north and south sides of this private street, connecting to the sidewalk on the west side of 65th Ave S. A ten foot wide bioswale is proposed along the south property line to provide drainage for the site, in combination with other drainage facilities proposed within the private road and along the east side of the site. Several trees are proposed for removal, as indicated on the Topographical Survey submitted to the City of Tukwila on March 6, 2007. The survey includes a tree replacement plan, with a replacement number of trees indicated for each tree proposed for removal, according to Tree Replacement Ratios contained in Chapter 18.54 Tree Regulations of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Additionally, at least one tree is required in the front yard for each of the six lots; according to landscaping requirements in TMC section 17.20.030 G. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1 -4 - Concur with checklist. 5 - Construction will follow issuance of the SEPA determination, short plat approval, and after all other required permits are obtained from the City of Tukwila or other agencies. 6 -8 - Concur with checklist. 9 - Short plat approval, public works and building permits. 10 - Minimum lot area within the LDR zoning district is 6500 square feet. Lot area counted toward the minimum square footage requirements cannot include street right -of -way, street JR Page 2 of 5 05/13/2008 4:17 PM H:\Short Plats \Singh\E07 -002 Singh Short Plat.doc easement, or private access roads serving more than one lot, according to 18.06.505 of the TMC. 11 - Concur with checklist. 12 - According to Tukwila's sensitive areas maps, a majority of the eastern side of the site, as well as a section along the western portion of the parcel, is classified as a Class 3 slope, meaning that landslide potential is high and the slope is between 15% and 40 %. Soils within Class 3 areas are relatively impermeable. To address the slopes on the site and the potential for geologic instability, the applicant submitted a geotechnical report which will be reviewed as part of the short plat application to determine if mitigation measures are necessary. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -g - Concur with checklist. h - The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. 2. Air: a - Applicant is required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency to address any emission to the air associated with this project. b -c - Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1) -a(6) - Concur with checklist. b(1) - A minimal amount of water may be discharged to groundwater within the bioswale drainage feature along the southern property line. b(2) - Concur with checklist. c(1) - The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. c(2) - Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. All impacts related to construction debris will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. d - The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. JR Page 3 of 5 05/13/2008 4:17 PM H:\Short Plats \Singh\E07 -002 Singh Short Plat.doc 4. Plants: a -d - Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a -b - Concur with checklist. c - This area is part of the Pacific Flyway, a primary corridor for migratory bird species. d - Tree species and planting locations for required replacement trees will be reviewed as part of the Short Plat application. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c - Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a(1-2) - Concur with checklist. b(1) - Concur with checklist. b(2) -b(3) - The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a -d - Concur with checklist. e - The current zoning classification of the project site is Low Density Residential (LDR) District. The minimum lot area within the LDR zone is 6500 square feet. f - The Comprehensive Plan designation of this site is Low Density Residential (LDR) g - Concur with checklist. h - Portions of the site are classified as Class 3 slopes, meaning that landslide potential is high and the slope is between 15% and 40 %. Soils within Class 3 areas are relatively impermeable. To address the slopes on the site and the potential for geologic instability, the applicant submitted a geotechnical report which will be reviewed as part of the short plat application to determine if mitigation measures are necessary. i -k - Concur with checklist. 1- This project will be reviewed to ensure consistency with existing and projected land uses and plans as part of the short plat application. 9. Housing: a -c - Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a -c - Concur with checklist. JR Page 4 of 5 05/132008 4:17 PM H:\Short Plats\Singh\E07 -002 Singh Short Plat.doc 11. Light and Glare: a -d - Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a -c - Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c - Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a -c - Concur with checklist. d - In addition to the new 20 foot private street that will serve the six new lots, a 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed on the north and south sides of the private street, connecting to the sidewalk along 65th Ave S. e - Concur with checklist. f -g - The applicant will be required to apply for a traffic concurrency certificate. 15. Public Services: a -b - Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a -b - Concur with checklist. COMMENTS : There were no written comments received in response to the notice of application. VII. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -340, a Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project This DNS is based on impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, and the above "Final Staff Evaluation for Application No. E07-011", and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Date: May 16, 2008 JR Page 5 of 5 05/132008 4:17 PM H:\Short Plats\Singh\E07 -002 Singh Short Plat.doc City of Tukwila Department of Community Development RE.CEIVED MAR 2 5 08 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number - x7-0/11 b7 -6oZ LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building Planning Public Works Fire Dept. _ ! Police Dept. ! Parks /Rec Project: 6i K A 6_ %o i Serf phd- Address: i5"71/ S C 5 /- -ve ,5 Date transmitted: 3/2'i /2az �y Response . requested by: `1 �7 / Lcz.> g Staff - coordinator: : omp g/ -i. v, .5 _ Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) (Sfft3 F .es Pv tot; c Iq' yks YeZr".1Yeenevlis .) Plan check date: Comments Update date: prepared by: COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAYBE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). RECEIVED Check items submitted with application Information Required. MAR 0 6 2001, May be waived -in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works. and Planning OMMuNIN nPVELOPMENT APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies). 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ". i:` 4. Application Fee $590: . — 1/ 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review. PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS: ,/ 6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or - Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout). - 7. Payment of a $100 mailing label fee to the City of Tukwila or Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family bui ldings- e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks- -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout). A//� 8. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 ft. of the subject lot. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: — c. 9. Vicinity Map with site location. N/A 10. •Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at www.ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information. /U /4 11; Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36 ". P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.cloc December 4, 2006 • CITY OF TUKWILA SEPA Department of Community DevelopmenbEC E' rIRONMENTAL 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 REVIEW Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplanAci.tukwila.wa.us MAR 0 6 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /4/9 69 L S /v - L or /Ef5 /l). /L7 77, 01. S1-/o %a PL ,9 7 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. S -, 71",ekv/I, i/v# 9 /f'8 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 359 700 - O .72 / DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 45:›G C: /t c Ye-/ ec,4/, /� 4 Address: /4 ? ? V "9/".6".", ,S 77,k14'' /i/i) k1/241 ?6/68 Phone: ' 2 Dom', G°a 4 a....... 746' FAX: E -mail: Signature: P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: File Number: L`- 0 ") —0 U /— Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /4/9 69 L S /v - L or /Ef5 /l). /L7 77, 01. S1-/o %a PL ,9 7 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. S -, 71",ekv/I, i/v# 9 /f'8 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 359 700 - O .72 / DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: 45:›G C: /t c Ye-/ ec,4/, /� 4 Address: /4 ? ? V "9/".6".", ,S 77,k14'' /i/i) k1/241 ?6/68 Phone: ' 2 Dom', G°a 4 a....... 746' FAX: E -mail: Signature: P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2001 CMMUNiTy DEVELO ji ENT City. of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 2 /7.3 l c, Applicant Name: /e9%`"14 6-71ves-i`J lVo ?v er .S 1-44 e 1/4 Ws../, y, £, Street Address: X9'2 c S 9 ei X96' , S. City, State, Zip: 7.4'4' 1"14-A J 64 Pe /6 Telephone: (206) 478 — Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and ainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each. No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES - ontinue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 . YE Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 1:.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO ontinue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle a opriate response. N Continue to Question 5 -0. YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a'geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45;060 or would require a geotechnical report if not . exempt should-answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 6 -0 /YE) Continue to Question 6 -0 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SEPAApp- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Part A (continued) City of TukwiloSA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Checklist Complete Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include. grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or . stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high w. ter mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue t� Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving; compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) ES - ontinue to Question 1 -4 r• City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from tiie creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES ontinue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. O - ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self-supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. (ontinue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 • 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to. Question 3 -0 (Page 2) City of Tukwil,A Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO ontinue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis,. "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within, the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of sal •• •nids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ' ontinue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right ban to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limiiied to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal • City of Tukwila SA Screening Checklist from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity sh • d answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please . circle appropriate response. Cliontinue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. ntinue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete ures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: /697'7 �- 5-7,7'/--,/ 6'L D 7 ,P6 s/ V FA' 7/A G ,S -sva2 > PGA 7 2. Name of Applicant: /e/A7 "le, /51 L S% A7 15 Ai 3. Date checklist prepared: 2 .'3',' / 4. Agency requesting checklist: ty of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): /V/92 T.E 3A-/2. Zoo7 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. �f'Of2 7 JaL 4' 7 .d % ©t." -fr ,57,f' 'C 7'€ -/ C.).€/" y' 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. /fr 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Vo P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SEPAApp- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. • Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. c5..2 J0/'-✓ 4 PA/9/,-e ,epee Eo.e. .S /p"- /1 /,v,.rs2,. /"./�/ /7 /c-c/a 4,7%4171 E'S 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 70 4Xg . // l .„5"/c ( /• / ® ,Vcr} /=.i' A,e'/,4-',0'tv/9 Y 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. "J—It/5— ' ni- /4 jiV e(.24 7 ,S /) e 5" .?-?4` A1147 S. •94171)"03(, 300 ' /Vow >-4/ c:PA" ef/x y 4/.vi 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? /VD Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, ollin: 'lly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Agency Comments To 7' - b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? yE 7‘,>/7. s"- o X a,= sue? ) (_ /c?'f What general types of soils are found on the site (for exampl d, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soi s, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Alo e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. /l .c. e-,,-15 e'v 7s /,z i - aei= "s 7 P. P/ X5 . L;%''/ v,e"Gk/.0 ', Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent,of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 57C, /-Ye-,? . /7,' / vim 44)/ 64✓,47 S- /moo vj �S /,‘"://,--,i)1,4" lid /✓4 /A/_. ;�. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: .S71- 7 / . "iv, 'G",Ei eeo frt.). 7/2 UG 7i CP r-! s-' 7 2.4 i roe' V-- /pF-- l/ i3' '74F- . 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Zo ,-t /40. &s.6- fc',ip ... pr ,O .r C.) f3 G. E ec.A 46." /'i Af b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. /V0 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: <i el _S" 7 ,//e) f /0.1roa1 eAc 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A/D 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. /174/6,ev;4=:•=" ?'v �� 5•-Y' .S'� -� 7 S"y -s.>. 0"'1 . 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan: 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /VU Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 401 Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the . number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. %e:7o,- s/ /-<'x) ZIG> - �,r� -� '.. .7.47/1Avi€'o 7'- J 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. //D d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: //4/ 1,�,�ss— L�.� � /.•/7.7",pe „ A 7/odr 70 Der a,! Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. . Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site :. L"*..°-Deciduous tree: . de •■ . 1- aspen, other '.- vergreen tree: ti, , eda pine, other ✓F Gr Grass °-"Isasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amoun.get ion will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use, of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: o ?..f' kV /CG 43:),F Zi4,/DSe-.9 P•60 G•G ow /1-14 X /t'ccs £ CofreS 7711c'� /eats %"a°e°G -. '/ de"' ,. /re .moo ` `y . • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, son bir , other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ,. ?o p Est r5, J? 49 > 7S, Q e6 51 c-.4, 7S/ Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: 4.047S b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migation route? If so, explain. U/'//yo d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy electr' natural ga oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy e s s? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. /7 //9 7 /#./‘ Lfoo,e,■-/ ,... Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: /7/a of ' -o ri-7 7 ,g,s1�i tn P . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /o 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: //4' • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? t `>' -moo S j /`1 /G f"o ' "A..4- L A / -I,' - 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. /7'57,4 c�/ii��E 7 7' — 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 7 /f!s ,fir- t�rilc& '- cJ ���'S /j.E/'77 /vL AvVL7! -- �� iGY /47,e5 /, .5- Loci /7 /S.0 o%cg Z74,i 4i) >iY S b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 1/0 • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. • Describe any structures on the site. Do7,6- v 57A- /?J d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ygs /�45' o �/� s7- ,�vc7v2/4" e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? /.J. 7 /'L. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: i. Approximately how many people woul reside work in the completed project? 6 1S k , ycv2- _ /'3,2>.,erW s /2.6-s/ J• Agency Comments Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? J /4/L., v s k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 01 f A Pv6 $/2 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Ass / /e-ia ace s 9. Housing a. a ximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, r low- income housing? /V .Etc/ /N/2) - /,vvO P-r Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: o,a"''-C 7 . �.�� t N `cam p S . 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? S ///7/ 7 l/r,‘" e'e a ,44ays6-1.5 0 /el° c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Q 1 / S- FS /4(i ////e.,H�S/.,/ , ' 77I_ L.9 -.g1D Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? - Pv /1 c,- / Agency Comments Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? /y c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nd d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? t. 17/1-i2 /C /C,Pe r 7-WE • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. /V 0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. A/o b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. /Vo' . Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 6 5`-#'` ,4 t/ , S , ,c-/P b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? � 65-',' "i S. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). s 2 vim' •s - P•.F , / 1 o /Iy00e m.v i-9 -- 7.S e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /Vo Agency Comments Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. /4'.E/Q ,p ej./P...0r15- 7/2, /6s) =r G o -7-,.)/ ,Os/4.4 V g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: VVA- 15. Public Services a. Would the pr - result in an protectio . o ' - protection, (7/ gS i ae It care, eased need for public services (for exampl other)? If so, generally describe. LAS'' ,/v vs,E.- //a a s b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: nat ate fuse>rvice system other: �caQ.,) el/9'n/ sanit• a W eptic. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. / c'J D S /7/0dJ'e"'(- C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. edge. I understand that the Signature: �� /�. /B6s-7 2 / ' ' 7 Date Submitted: (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). • of BASIS i OF BEARWOS OF 135TH AVE SOUTH BEARING' NORTH 1687'22 WEST AS SHOWN -ON PLAT.• GRAPHIC.SCALE" '" 30 "1 (• Di. rieET) 1 inch SO fL FOUND 3/4' IP .VI/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 'PLS 23604.' h 'PIS 12336' CENTERLINE CONTROL MONUMENTS RECORD OF SURVEY A PORTION OF LOT 17, INTERURBAN ADDfT)ON TO Th R CRY OF SEATTLE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23,. TWP. 23 N, RGE 4 E, WILLIMATfE MERIDIAN, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON PLAT MON DOWN 282' TIES BY L523804 888'4539'W 54821' VVVY N8r4T3W'W (PLAT) NO IN W /CAN LS Ng. ,21501 0.87'S & 0.11'E OF CALC. POSITION (WAS SET AS It OFFSET 5) 0 104.59 S. 153RD 8T M.W. ADDITION VOL. 53 P. 48. 588'4539'E 20.08 3 8.001 sq. R 0.18 cares 10458' 48,1301 0 FWD. IP W /CAP LS No 12336 1.09' N. & 0.11' E OF CALC.POS ON 8' BOARD FENCE LINE THAT 'PORTION OF LOT ..17, JNTERURBAN•ADDRION TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE. . ACCORDING TO THE, PLAT THEREOF RECORDED. IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS. PAGE 55. IN KING 000NIY,• WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' BEGINING 'ON THE.'WEST UNE OF SAID LOT AT A POINT 210 FEET NORTH OF - SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 89'47'00'. EAST TO WESTERLY LINE OF 65 AVE SOUTH, AND THE TRUE- . POINT OF BEGINING. • . THENCE SotTH 611.47'00• WEST 333 FEET; • THENCE NORTH.PARALLEL -WITH THE WEST UNE OF SAID- LOT. A DISTANCE OF 153 FEET; THENCE NORTH- 89'47'00. EAST TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF 65TH AVE. SOUTH; THENCE' SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID UNE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNIG; .EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED. TO THE CITY OF -TUKWRA FOR STREET. PURPOSES UNDER.RECORDING - NO. 7105100427• S GERTIRCA"T`E • RECORODIG'NUMBER • FAd for record thii _ day of": b, book_ of: -_ at pops RICHARD VAISVILA SLAVEIOIVY MAC . 2098 d �Y a! tM novae of 11pr. Apt. of Rocarda 1.10 4 8.000 eq. ft. 0.18 acres 104.59 2 100.13' 7.851 sq. ft. 0.18 acres 5.q, ft. cres 10'113' 5 8.234 sq. ft. 0.19 aces 110.14' • N88'45'39'8 339.11' ALL CENTEI8JNE CONTROL MONUMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RECORD OF SURVEY WERE VISITED IN JUNE 2008. BglEgE 1. PLAT OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE VOL 10 P. 55 2. REPIAT OF M. W. ADDITION VOL 53 P. 48 3. 57IROETERS SURVEY K.C. REC. N0. 8705069004 4. 65TH AVE S ROAD PROJECT BY, RUSS COFFELT AF. 7112290409 5. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S We OF SE 23- 23-04. SURVEY METHODOLOGY THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED USING A NIKON DTM 420 TOTAL STATION. CONTROL MONUMENTS WERE MEASURED AND COMPARED TO RECORD. THIS SURVEY ME TS OR MUDS THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN WAC 332- 130 -090. SURVEYOR OF REOORD RICHARD VNSVILA P.LS. 8041 CHAMPIONSHIP CIRCLE MUUOLTEO. WA 98275 PHONE (425) 299 -1739 E -MAL• ricVdsvO)uno.com 97 4 N 88'25'27'W 1.09' 85.34' PLAT 1A VOLJPAOE 4 0 ENO. IP W/i 0.21'S k 0.12' 7.274 eq. ft. 0.17 aces 210.00' mop= ACAS! EA91m T 104.87' 00.10° cam 12439' FWD. IP W /CAP LS No. 238 BEGIN FENCE 0.7 S OF PROP. IN END. IP W /CAP LS No. 12 1.10' S 0.32' E ON ROW UNE \ SURVEYOR'S CEFRORCATE Mb map wow* 011p00.o 1 0 007'0' mod" by ms a undo" ray dhooaon M canfamana rah 1M npu6xaaifo of tin manly Recording Act at gm format of .c . A JUN& 2008 RICHARD W819A 52.S No. 39570 "RFNf:HMARK: . 1 1 1 1 1 / / / VA MN ./l0• It IIPANx r.Al %la • A/J MB0 NI A! IN // N31 ( :1IIN (0 /1/ AV/ 'S 6 .t' /..9•;// Si I NA !/• V/1N' LS /b. P3404 -' OUI•S. 40H'E Cr CALL'POSITION (WAS' SET AS V OFFSET S) TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY OF A POR710N OF LOT 17, INTERURBAN ADDITION TO THE CRY OF SEATTLE SE. 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 4 E, • WCLLAMETTE MERIDIAN, KING cowry, WASHNOTON 8153RD 8T M.W. .ADDITION VOL. 53 P. 48 15 '30 SCALE 1' = 30' OIAOL/K rill r ouwMC ro a • 11 ND. 1P Y/CAP LS Nu 12336 1.09' N: -& 0.11• E OF CALC.POS. ON 6' BOARD FENCE UNE N86'45'39'W 339.11' LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS THAT 'PORION.0F LOT 17, INTERURBAN ADDITKIN TO THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF.RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, INKING COUNTY, •WASHINGTOMDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINING ON -THE WEST UNE.OF SAID" LOT AT A POINT 210 FEET NORM OF "SOUTHWEST-CORNER THEREOF;' THENCE NORTH 8547'00'. EAST TO WESTERLY UNE OF 65 AVE SOUTH. MD THE TRUE PONT OF BECINING. THENCE SOUTH 8547.00' WEST 333 FEET: THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST UNE OF SAID 1.0T, A DISTANCE OF 153 FEEL THENCE NORTH 89'47.00' EAST TO THE WESTERLY UNE OF 65TH AVE. SOUTH: THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID LINE TO THE TRUE PONT OF BECINNIG; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DELUEU 10 THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR STREET PURPOSES UNDER RECORDING NO. 7105100427. LEGEND ® WIPIIPm meant MOOT • =WY Curl WM= ® COM n•l mnaa ID oa as TA 11117A.1A1L• MC MOW. mswwt oQ ®wGtI Da Dam CM • f(420 4.a 3 SUR 'TOR "CERTIFICATE• 1 CERTIFY. THAT THIS MAP REPRESENTS A TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION IN __ 20_, AT THE REQUEST Cr RICHARD VAISVILA P.LS CERT. N0. 39570 RICHARD VAISVILA" P.L.S. 6041 CHAMPIONSHIP CIRCLE MULKILTEO,; WA .98275 PHONE: (425) 299 =1739 ; E —MAIL: rigvaisv ©juno.com )•f.R /frRAP eAr•ri • CS SX ) 7yj 01/1 . 40- . • /E 0.1E). MOO !l/ me T.0Z • /R). M�OK_. R/n- fi.eU 0 felts• • ,V.Jr it /IVCR -fy •a,. /TOAD SECTION rtni.ry •: t7,46'3tj•Z • .4a Anm Vr,� 3a. t • 4 .,wmAeuw 1TS• • t;r- ,•••tnen: t (4 rr..ti• •ZS.T(c iN.*t 4,.y,e 1E •'- G.wthb.A,lwp{o, r�•ea ,a,• .ou.uva, rr• '�4:e.L n.ltrirrttl+Yla't EV.�m't auA tr., P.16, v53■ IZ r.- .ty.r, ur. it 111071'3,1,3A 5(3 7," v+ `oA 9•92.,.wxa: 99,14.'0 BR • 7iryM,t04T:- • ens,•.Mlxeawn e.4 tvags4 d3.*) noate+ 0(W* .aow ry1TT i!'rn•.bal•ai my .kinA 77.17 A:bmwukt.ta E.:'lµ wta,sr b.. • Pe'N.i,MAJ•Mlgd'✓eva ktY'l,e Ym •V, pro mreit: ;Mns +1T ppvar.em' • tMe.i t.••u,Marw. ; • .1I,Ntl11igl. otata.se?Vt EV.NON a•M NAN>i'b ynWgrxi•Jworr.■ A•otoMf eL3.HpD]Anraur,u kV..l bet av1 °Mon.4's Me Nwl atto A.o.+t t., Nw, .0• vW /tttt. _wl,g.•tM.f(,.NN.ant*,e.A�m•EL nLI en•N I}'!•,e ette mot very Mf•can pr1 ]rtcbu•vpNMpL.71wt } el:k Nnay:.V 1 Le eon., .0 sing, st. Went •Apo•16 t•.vmt t':Er:'tp WSt•.„ q.lZ' a, ! nATEt i/i01li SALE! / "L' 1541555th Avenue S T14411 . WA 90155 PM. 5597004521 • REV Kong E C2067 4711-91111 • race S. MacVeigh, PE. — Civil Engineer 14245 596 ATM* 566 made. WA 9llp . Mew PK)20717 TAI! time- m bit rvnio..." ■■••ti••••••• rr••••••:r� per = •••• •••.*"'"' .r.r••■•a.a• u+..•rrr. �_�• .Yl.r'.rr.vwJr'r. rrrr�. • .. • roar. cd. • rr�•iL3'...yrryr.....r s4•rrrrirrrr.i.�.rr.:..r . • . . ..rZ..r.rir.r......n....r.r+ ••••. ..0 ---- • __j_____ • rm..ti.Y.f® • i • • . • tommoitimowairaosonsileatmmolairi..1*, arid Ws .mizm- - le mr. \,...s. 11--_,:•_,Lp imi MA, • /as.pe M1..aelra •rn r/fE .v r1ASN/ZZD ears we//aN • /PoY /OE .BIOCC /N6' . .4 ENe77•G 04416 • • • EX /S7 /N6 eowroort NEW 'LAONrO✓Lr SITE AREA 48,119 SF (1.10 AC.) ,3",a7 FENGE eLEOR /Nd L /.nir • f7YP /tAL Q 0 /L) . AREA CLEARED 48,119 SF (1.10 AO.) EARTHWORK - GUT •850CY FILL 85QCY (Some extra o4 meek* not used to formal ®wm be wanted In non.hJmaat&ses of the site to be determined at the car:fusion of the ihort plat construction show' on nib pan It is not planned for extra excavated materiel to be removed Gan 1Ne atfe.) /I" NOTE Grades shown in road areas ev➢cete finished paved Oradea Fine 9rodlnp prior to road bed preparation must take tide into account and deduct the ddda,ess of base. top came and pavement shown on the typical rood pavement sedla,. • 1 :3 of 3 Bruce S. MacVeigh, P.E. - Civil Engi Alt MERL 3 ,u.sveanc,mJ7a 6itOt1EET WM.* 919UCe»w,.1 s.0N10 E laPGw ?iU M0. a 11G■M.0000E .70 9d. 3J E0a3201G1071, 2. SU 004.2.14.1i F47 TE 91C2 N.M MOM t OT. EFT0A0 00,TMaa990E3a.,TE0090a01u.0E 4. 4 .,b1E.T SWIMS WV RIOIE0 1,09 ,w112 W 0,) W.U.O. /. •21, 107.00' TYPICAL ROADWAY 7ECT70N City of .: ... Tukwila ice. ,Tp1 _TYPE ■ (IS.OI (• -N.6169, 5"/ PE ' T6LM ' - I.9 Gust. A . M.Ee Bad Are LMAm - I _ gam - 9,104 . 7,204 • 2.239.7 • aTEU - • E6343 • 3 • 7100 1,431 9634 1170 9,6293 ' 9.070 - 1 • 6 • 2.3.1 7.006 0 - 0 2.000. 1.490.6 116.01' 9 SANITARY 6EWER EMEMEN1 FOR LOT 6 ed. -F2 (01'43 2T" fROP is 1.2(0 ),... IVOLUME: .. PAGE:. Diplomat d Commonly C9wkow et ' POO Illoa6owOr 4 WWI %WA Taiga. tin).,�9 0011)41140 110 . PRELIMINARY SHORT PLAT SHORT PLAT NUMBER Lot 6 Oros' Lot Area Frivol Rod Area Lot Area .. 1 8,070 1,283.4 6,786.6 2 9,154 2,539.7 6,614.3 3 7,600 962.1 6,637.9 4 7,665 1,053.8 6,6112 5 8,560.3 0 ' 8,5603 6 7,080.6 0 7,080.6 PLAT NON 00101 2X2' TES BY'LS23604 FND. IP W /CAP LS No. 23804 87'S. "A0.11'E OF CALL POSITION (WAS SET AS 1' OFFSET S) M.W. . ADDITION ::VOL. 53 P. 48. 588'45*E 200.08'. • "_... • 107.00' SIDEWALK, DRAIN' ACACE d U181TIE EASEMENT BETWEEN . . ALL 8 LOTS (901N 5IDE5). '. LOT 5 • • 8,580 "eq. ft. 48,130 sq. ft.Deme 1.10" acres BASIS OF BEARINGS CENTERLINE OF 85TH AVE SOUTH BEARING NORTH 16'57'22` WEST AS SHOWN ON PLAT... ORAPMO SCALE .. 0 15 30 60 S88•45•39'E . 107.00' . MESS. 'DRAINAGE &.UTILITIES EASEMENT BEIREEN LOT 5 AND LOT 8 ONLY . LOT "g. 7.081 oq. •N. • FND. IP W /CAP LS No. 12336 1.09' N. A 0.11'. E OF CAL0.POS ON 6' BOARD FENCE UNE 7,66s aq. rt. . • ' s,;iili+;,�st��a #�-v�. ws i4va GNYFWAY `, ! =fi' W NOTES . .. ALL CENTERLINE • CONTROL MONUMENTS SHOWN ON THIS RECORD OF SURVEY WERE VISITED IN JUNE "2008.. TREE INVl4T1RY WAS UPDATED 'AFTER -F1ED VISR IN' JANUARY 2008. 4 . REFERENCES..' 1. PLAT OF THE INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE VOL 10 P. 55 2.. REPLAT OF 11, W. ADDITION VOL 53 P. 48 3. SHROETERS SURVEY K.C. REC. NO. 8705069004 4. 65TH AVE S -ROAD PROJECT BY RUSS COFFELT A.F. 7112299499 5. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP OF SE 23- 23-04. 6. THE 1IT11 REPORT BY TALON GROUP GUARANTY N0. 1005239. . SURVEY ME HODOLOGY . . THIS .SURVEY WAS' PERFORMED USING A NIKON 'DIM 420 TOTAL STATION.- CONTROL MONUMENTS' WERE MEASURED AND 'COMPARED TO RECORD. THIS SURVEY MEETS OR EXCEEDS. THE REQUIREMENTS sET:FORTH N • . WAC 332 =130 -090. miuo r nzo !mmn oao:v . . . • (— uafn ru woo. 900RE8g • 15415 65111 ,AVE S: DRAWN 8Y:•1.8' • - CITYIBTATEmP. TURWO.A WA 98168 CHECKED BY: RW, 01/06/08 ' 1 Inch . 30 5L 2