Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E07-006 - TISCHMAK ROBIN - TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT (PHASES II AND III)
TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ROADWAY WIDENING S. 116T" ST. & S. 138T" ST. E07 -006 ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Adoption for (check appropriate box) ° DNS ' EIS other Description of current proposal: Planned street improvements for Tukwila International Boulevard from S. 116th Street to S. 132nd Street (Phase 2) and S. 132 "d Street to S. 138th Street (Phase 3). Work includes minor roadway widening, ACP overlay, bus pullouts, installation of curb, gutter and sidewalks, landscaping, signing, illumination, utility undergrounding, retaining walls, drainage and traffic signal modifications. Proponent: City of Tukwila Location of current proposal: Tukwila International Boulevard from S. 116th Street to S. 138th Street. Title of documents being adopted: Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary Agency that prepared document being adopted: City of Tukwila Public Works Date adopted document was prepared: Phase 2 3/28/2006, Phase 3 3/30/2006 Description of document (or portion) being adopted: Local Agency Environmental Classification Summaries for Phases 2 and 3 leading to NEPA Class II Documented CE determinations. These were supported by a Biological Assessment "No Effects Letter" and a Section 106 Cultural and Historical Resources Report. If the document being adopted has been challenged (WAC 197 -11 -630), please describe: No The document is available to be read at (place /time): City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Bl. Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM M -F We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. The document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decisionmaker. Name of agency adopting document: City of Tukwila Responsible official: Jack Pace Position /title: Acting DCD Director Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Address: City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Bl. Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 Date: May 25, 2007 Signature Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION /, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non- Significance "A- Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Name: 3:1;• , cS$ Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt -b . Notice of Action Person requesting mailing: N_ Planning Commission Agenda Pkt 1 Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Oth-r ��� fl� Olt i; (9 ;,� iCvi r)- /14 OC Was mailed to each of the addresses 1fisted on this asp day of year 200-1 in the P:\ ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMS\AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION "A- ' j/1 v` €(1 Project Name: 3:1;• , cS$ Project Number: "�- Mailer's Signature: -b . ./,,021_ Person requesting mailing: N_ 1 P:\ ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMS\AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION rtUtIAL AVCnn.Ic� ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGGI�RS pt),FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINI TION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIReENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT .U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY p4 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. p) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE N KING COUNTY AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV sy/DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL • SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT 82 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT () TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON UBRARY () KENT UBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY ( ) OWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY ()HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTITIESS CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT () TUKWILA CITY P 8 C.WORKS DEPARTMENTS: () E PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK () HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR KC. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT () OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT 820 ( ) WATER DISTRICT 8125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN () TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* • NOTICE OF AU. SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM FISHERIES PROGRAM WILDLIFE PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:WDMINISTRATWV ELFORMS\CHKLIST.DOC X DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY px) SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION •SENO NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON OUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHUNE TIMES ( ) CLTUKIMLA.WA.US.WWW SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant 'Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record ' send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division. -:SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations; etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS:.. Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application May do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General . *Applicant '.Indian Tribes •Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record ' send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attornev General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) . Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc: from PMI's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:I ADMINISTRATIVEIFORMSCHICUST .DOC CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION The City of Tukwila Public Works Department has filed applications for planned street improvements to Tukwila International Boulevard. Phase 1 of the project is nearly complete. This application would cover Phases 2 and 3 from S. 116th Street to S. 138th Street. NEPA approvals for both Phases were given by FHWA on September 12, 2006 based on the following documents: Environmental Classification Summary for Phases 2 and 3 Biological Assessment Letter of No Effect to Listed Species Section 106 — Cultural and Historical Resources Report FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., May 16, 2007. No public hearing is required for this request. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The development permit may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. No administrative appeal of the SEPA environmental determination shall be allowed. For further information on this proposal, contact Robin Tischmak at (206) 433 -0179 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday - Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGSRS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE () U.S. ENVIROENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. () DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE P •SEND • SEND KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT () TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON UBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY () OWEST () SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT&T CABLE SERVICES • () HEALTH DEPT () PORT OF SEATTLE ) K.C. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ) KC. LAND & WATER RESOURCES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: 14 PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POLICE () FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK OTHER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL. COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE gIMUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM pi-FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDMINISTRATIV EIFORMSICHKLIST.DOC 7 () FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL. DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 () WATER DISTRICT #125 O CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA-TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES pDUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY (SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COAUTION *SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCAT1ONS ON OUWAMISH RIVER MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.VWWV PI IC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PrITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) `Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division. —SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General Applicant •Indian Tribes . . *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMI's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) ▪ Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: ADMFN1STRATIVEIFORMS\CI XLIST.DOC City of Tu wila Department of Community Development RECEIVE APR 2 3 2001 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS File Number X07 -006 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: -! Budding ` Planning MPubliC Works ! Fire Dept. _! Police Dept. L-11:! Parks /Rec Project: Address: 43, 1 / 6 " 4-- 1.17 /7:), i -3E3r; , Date transmitted: ! / �3 J I v7 Response requested by: /7 I/O 7 Staff coordinator: /0 v r "_ Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60 -day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) NPR is (Ri2eCiLeti (79-1 S4e0t-..- al6te,Vt'Uig-e- P6d h-442 7X0' Plan check date: 5//0107 Comments � S prepared by: Update date: INFORMATION MEMO • TO: Steve Lancaster — Director, Department of Community Development FROM: obin Tischmak - Project Manager, Public Works DATE: April 16, 2007 SUBJECT: Tukwila International Blvd. — Phases 2 & 3 (S 116th St to S 138th St) SEPA Determination Project Nos. 95 -RWO3 & 95 -RWO4 Planned street improvements for Tukwila International Boulevard have been divided into multiple phases to create projects that are suitable for available grant funding and are more manageable as construction projects. Phase 1 (S 138th St to S 152nd St) construction is nearly complete. Phase 2 (S 116th St to S 132nd St) and Phase 3 (S 132nd St to S 138th St) were separately funded projects that are being combined into a single construction project. Both Phases 2 and 3 were awarded federal grant funds and are required to meet federal NEPA requirements. Separate Environmental Classification Summaries were prepared and approved for each project, but the background reports were prepared as single documents that cover both phases of the street improvements. NEPA approvals for each project were given by FHWA on September 12, 2006. A SEPA determination and/or approval is still necessary. Based on our previous discussions, I am submitting copies of all documentation submitted to FHWA to receive NEPA approval. Attached to this memo are four (4) copies of each of the following documents or reports: • Environmental Classification Summary for Phase 2 • Environmental Classification Summary for Phase 3 • Biological Assessment "No Effects Letter" • Section 106 — Cultural and Historical Resources Report Some of the original items included in the background reports were produced in color. All copies attached to this memo were photocopied and are black and white. Color copies can be provided if necessary My understanding of the SEPA process as described to me indicates that with your review of the NEPA documentation, your agreement with the findings will allow you to adopt the NEPA findings and issue a SEPA determination. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. attachments: ECS (2), BA, Section 106 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION LS / HEREBY DECLARE THAT: ,Notice of Public Hearing Project Name: $+}.S2.14— \ •4 / IS ' LIZ. Determination of Non - Significance Signature: Itit441.4Arb,g/t4OCk Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda otice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 20 61 day of in the P:\ ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMS\AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION Project Name: $+}.S2.14— \ •4 / IS ' LIZ. Project Number: Signature: Itit441.4Arb,g/t4OCk Person requesting mailing: i\Jr14k_CTej1/44--- L P:\ ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMS\AFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION INFORMATION MEMO TO: Steve Lancaster — Director, Department of Community Development FROM: 02tobin Tischmak - Project Manager, Public Works DATE: April 16, 2007 SUBJECT: Tukwila International Blvd. — Phases 2 & 3 (S 116th St to S 138th St) SEPA Determination Project Nos. 95 -RW03 & 95 -RW04 Planned street improvements for Tukwila International Boulevard have been divided into multiple phases to create projects that are suitable for available grant funding and are more manageable as construction projects. Phase 1 (S 138th St to S 152nd St) construction is nearly complete. Phase 2 (S 116th St to S 132nd St) and Phase 3 (S 132nd St to S 138th St) were separately funded projects that are being combined into a single construction project. Both Phases 2 and 3 were awarded federal grant funds and are required to meet federal NEPA requirements. Separate Environmental Classification Summaries were prepared and approved for each project, but the background reports were prepared as single documents that cover both phases of the street improvements. NEPA approvals for each project were given by FHWA on September 12, 2006. A SEPA determination and/or approval is still necessary. Based on our previous discussions, I am submitting copies of all documentation submitted to FHWA to receive NEPA approval. Attached to this memo are four (4) copies of each of the following documents or reports: • Environmental Classification Summary for Phase 2 • Environmental Classification Summary for Phase 3 • Biological Assessment "No Effects Letter" • Section 106 — Cultural and Historical Resources Report Some of the original items included in the background reports were produced in color. All copies attached to this memo were photocopied and are black and white. Color copies can be provided if necessary My understanding of the SEPA process as described to me indicates that with your review of the NEPA documentation, your agreement with the findings will allow you to adopt the NEPA findings and issue a SEPA determination. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. attachments: ECS (2), BA, Section 106 WiWashington State Department of Transportation June 13, 2006 TO: Phil Segami MS -121 ext 4736 FROM: Michael MacDonald MS -138 ext. 4909 Memorandum SUBJECT: City of Tukwila, International Boulevard Phase 2 and 3 letter of No Effect to listed species I have reviewed the revised No Effect letter and it contains the information necessary to support the determination of No Effect on listed species and habitats. I have no comments and the form is sufficient as presented. DOT Form 700 -008 EF Revised 5/99 June 2, 2006 • Gity of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James F. Morrow, P.E., Director Ed Conyers, P.E. Local Programs Manager Northwest Region Local Programs MS 121 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133 -9710 RE: Tukwila International Blvd. Redevelopment Project Federal Aid # STPF- 0099(077) Tukwila International Blvd. — Phase 3 Federal Aid # STP(U) -0099( ) Biological Assessment Dear Mr. Conyers: This letter is intended to comply with Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act for the above referenced projects. The City of Tukwila is proposing to construct corridor roadway improvements on Tukwila International Blvd. (T.I.B.) between S 116th St and S 138th St. (See attached vicinity map.) This project is approximately 1.4 miles long and is comprised of two separate federally funded transportation projects that have been tied together as a single construction project. Both projects are included in this assessment. The purpose of this project is to construct urban street amenities along both sides of the roadway that include: curbs, gutters, sidewalks, illumination, landscaping, bus pullouts, storm drainage facilities, and relocation of overhead utilities to underground. (See attached cross section.) No additional vehicular travel lanes are proposed. The existing roadway includes two through -lanes in each direction, an intermittent center turn lane, and paved shoulders. Construction is anticipated to begin in March 2007 and to be completed in August 2008. The most current endangered species listings were obtained from the websites of NMFS and USFWS on May 26, 2006 and copies are attached to this letter. The following listed species are addressed within this assessment: Bald eagles, Chinook salmon, Steelhead trout, Bull trout, and Dolly varden, as well as Essential Fish Habitat.. Other species that are listed, but do not occur in the project area include: Killer Whale, Humpback Whale, Stellar Sea Lion, Sea Turtles (Leatherback, Loggerhead, Green, and Olive Ridley), Canada lynx, Gray wolves, Grizzly bears, Marbled murrelets, Northem spotted owls, Marsh sandwort, and Golden paintbrush. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • Mr. Ed Conyers June 2, 2006 Page 2 The proposed project is located in Sections 9, 10, 15, and 16 of Township 23 North, Range 4 East. Construction activities will include installation of retaining walls, storm water facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, illumination, asphalt paving, and conduits for underground utilities. Typical construction equipment will be used such as backhoes, dump trucks, asphalt/concrete saws, loaders, vibratory compactors, pavement grinders, paving machines, and drilling rigs. Construction activities will occur during daytime hours in accordance with local noise ordinances. In general, visual and audible disturbances related to normal construction activities are expected to exceed ambient levels up to %2 mile from the source of the disturbance. No blasting is anticipated or warranted. The proposed project also includes significant water quality improvements. Currently, roadway runoff is directly discharged to the branch of the nearest creek with no treatment or detention. This project will collect all roadway runoff into a separate new system and provide treatment and detention, in accordance with the Highway Runoff Manual, prior to discharge to the Duwamish River. Existing impervious area within the project limits is 16.54 acres (74 %) and the proposed project will add approximately 0.73 acres. The proposed treatment facility will provide treatment for 10.35 acres. Field reviews were completed by the project team on three separate occasions. On January 18, 2006 the City /Consultant design team (including engineering and environmental staff) visually inspected the existing drainage system and creek systems along the project. The proposed storm water plan was evaluated against the existing collection system and potential impacts to nearby creek systems were noted and discussed. The project site was photographed on January 31, 2006. On February 2, 2006 a field review was completed by the City /Consultant design team to determine the occurrence of and anticipated impacts to ESA listed animal and plant species. The project setting for the portion of Tukwila International Boulevard included in this analysis generally traverses the west hillside of the Green/Duwamish River valley. The roadway is cut into the hillside creating steep uphill slopes to the west and steep. downhill slopes to the east. Storm water and groundwater runoff from the hillside and above is collected in pipes and ditches that eventually converge near the toe of the hillside to create the typical stream channels for several branches of local creeks. The toe of the hillside is currently the upstream limit for any possible fish access or habitat and is east of the project construction limits. The corridor is surrounded by residential development along the south half and commercial development along the north half, excluding some areas directly adjacent to the street that have not been developed due to the steep slopes. These undeveloped areas are generally vegetated with trees and grasses. Typically, the shoulders are paved and do not include curbs, gutters, and sidewalks with the exception of two small areas. Curb, gutter and sidewalk was constructed on the west side of the street from S 130`h St to S 132 "d St and on the east side of the street in the vicinity of S 124th St, along the frontage of a recent development. The current speed limit through the project area is 45 mph. • • Mr. Ed Conyers June 2, 2006 Page 3 There is no suitable habitat on the project site or in the project vicinity for any of the species addressed in this report. Due to the steepness of the hillside and other fish barriers downstream of the project, none of the four listed fish species have access to the project area. The lack of fish presence indicates there is also no fish habitat within the project area. The species data obtained from USFWS does not include any nesting territories, wintering roosts or other documented bald eagle use in the project vicinity. This statement is supported by the site visits where no visible evidence was found to support any type of bald eagle habitat in the project vicinity. No Essential Fish Habitat exists in the project action area. There are no documented bald eagle wintering roosts, nesting territories, or other species activities in the project vicinity. Bald eagles may, at times, be present in the area, but any such presence is likely to be pass through or temporary. Since bald eagles do not have a presence or desirable habitat in the project area, no impact to bald eagles is likely to occur as a result of construction of this project. Chinook salmon and its habitat are not present in the project vicinity. Downstream barriers prevent any fish from accessing the project site from the Duwamish River or its tributaries. No impact to Chinook salmon or its habitat is likely to occur as a result of construction of this project. Steelhead trout and its habitat are not present in the project vicinity. Downstream barriers prevent any fish from accessing the project site from the Duwamish River or its tributaries. No impact to Steelhead trout or its habitat is likely to occur as a result of construction of this project. Bull trout/Dolly varden and their habitat are not present in the project vicinity. Downstream barriers prevent any fish from accessing the project site from the Duwamish River or its tributaries. No impacts to Bull trout/Dolly varden or their habitat are likely to occur as a result of construction of this project. No Essential Fish Habitat is present within the project vicinity. Migrating fish cannot access the project vicinity due to downstream barriers. Construction of this project is not likely to impact any Essential Fish Habitat. The proposed project will have "no effect" on Bald eagles due to the lack of species presence and the lack of habitat within the project vicinity. The proposed project will have "no effect" on Chinook salmon due to the tack of species presence in the project vicinity, the lack of habitat within the project vicinity, and the anticipated improved water quality. The proposed project will have "no effect" on Bull trout due to the lack of species presence in the project vicinity, the lack of habitat within the project vicinity, and the anticipated improved water quality. • • Mr. Ed Conyers June 2, 2006 Page 4 The proposed project will "not jeopardize" Steelhead trout due to the lack of species presence in the project vicinity, the lack of habitat within the project vicinity, and the anticipated improved water quality. A "conditional no effect" determination is warranted. The proposed project will "not jeopardize" Dolly varden due to the lack of species presence in the project vicinity, the lack of habitat within the project vicinity, and the anticipated improved water quality. A "conditional no effect" determination is warranted. The proposed project will have "no effect" on Essential Fish Habitat due to the lack of presence in the project vicinity and the anticipated improved water quality. It is our understanding that this satisfies our responsibilities under Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act at this time and we are sending you this copy of our assessment for your files. We will continue to remain aware of any change in status of these species and will be prepared to re- evaluate potential project impacts if necessary. To ensure concurrence with these findings, we request that you transmit a letter signifying your agreement with these conclusions. Please call me at (206) 431 -2455 if you require any additional information or have any questions about this project. Sincerely, 7---1.4,e_g,z.,4• Robin Tischmak, P.E. Project Manager Attachments: Vicinity Map / Action Area Map Street Cross Section Photos Species Lists File: 95- RW03 -6 95- RW04 -6 • • Washington State a1 Department of Transportation May 2, 2006 TO: Phil Segami MS -121 ext 4736 FROM: Michael MacDonald MS -138 ext. 4909 Memorandum SUBJECT: City of Tukwila, International Boulevard Phase 2 and 3. I have reviewed the Biological Assessment and the information provided supports a No Effect determination on federally listed species and habitats due to the lack of exposure from the projects direct and indirect actions. I recommend the document be rewritten in the form of a No Effect letter and only address species and habitats that could possibly occur the Duwamish River area. DOT Form 700 -008 EF Revised 5/99 zr Club tir S 111 11 S 112 St S 111 St S 116 St S 113 St / a / / /ice -- -tS St S 124 St S 133 St S 13 S 135 St S 137 St H S 136 St S 136 St t S 146 S S1148 St S 150 St S 154 St S 154 St <S156St City of Tukwila Tukwila International Boulevard S 116 St to S 138 St 1 June 2, 2006 Vicinity Map i aim 1i= 1111, /del / O 0 o MATERIAL CODE BAIWAIS CCUMP5CB r eau a B TOR MOW 2 r 161* ae r CSBC • C moo COLRE?E SRI(W** CURB a CUTTER. 16 Mot r PARR fool 7 6' 10PS03. TYPE A CCImAC181 SUBOURE COSTAL PAYEIEAIT to 085181521' COOT COMMA PAWEMT -IS -7r 1RAMI IA1E Ir !RAM LAW • Ir WE WDI 7r•W7E COMA 8EDU8 11' TRAWL cue u TRAWL tARE r as -.s PIANRF K' 1RAWL IAIE Ropc TARES 11' IRAW IAIE TYPICAL SECTm3I B APiRGX STA 172403 ID STA 172466 MIS 12' RIO -RY 16T TURN IAIE 11. OR core MUM PM TIME* TRAWL INC o61A11 UMW WERE WIN a PIES RE MICA ECM MIT 7l1 .A 8180 050 WI/Sm. • - 14' -2r TIM LI7E 0 0 © p o O 0 0 TYPICAL SECTION C APPRCR STA 08+77 0 STA 117+51 875 • CUM wink a =MA 10 BE Calm= BY ones P UBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING • STREE('S • ITATER • SETE R •BUILDING • 6A1 was was 1i 0215 w KPG 1••••••••••■• � .•••_.■ •-b 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TYPICAL SECTIONS 1-31t68 et r =MS ICIk PA ale &ran J • 0SCN1524.JPG 2006/01/31 10:48:16 DSCN1525.JPG 2006/01/31 10:48:36 3SCN1526.JPG 2006/01131 10:50:16 DSCN1527.JPG 2006/01/31 10:53:12 )SCN1532.JPG 2006/01131 10:5703 DSCN1533.JPO 2006/01/31 10:57:44 1SCN1534.JPG 2006101/31 11:04:45 DSCN1535.JPG 2006/01/3111:0505 Endangered Species Act Status of West Coast Salmon & Steelhead /Updated .lp,u 11). 2,U) i Species' Current Endangered Species Act Listin • Status' ESA Listing Actions Under Review 1 Snake River l.,,d,u,g,rrd Sockeye Salmon (Oncorkynckw 2 Ozette lake /,,,.,,rrarJ nerka) 3 Baker River Not Warranted 4 Okanogan River Nor Warranted 5 lake Wenatchee Not Warranted 6 Quinalt lake Not Warranted 7 Lake Pleasant Not Warranted 8 Sacramento River Winter -ran I:,,,/,,,, rd Chinook Salmon 9 Upper Columbia River Spring -run (0. hkawytscha) 10 Snake River Spring/Summer-run lh„•on•,,,•J 11 Snake River Fall -run 1111' 114.11,•,1 12 Puget Sound Ua.,,r, •,r, •:1 13 Lower Columbia River II,,,,,,,v,,,r 14 Upper Willamette River u, edd',,,, d 15 Central Valley Spring-run n,,,•,nr,n./ 16 California Coastal /ho „m ned 17 Central Valley Fall and fate Fall -run 18 Upper Klamath•Trioity Rivera Not Warranted 19 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 20 Washington Coast Not Warranted 21 Middle Columbia River spring -turn Not Warranted 22 Upper Columbia River summedfall -run Not Warranted 23 Southern Oregon and Northern California Coast Not Warranted 24 Deschutes Riveraummedtall -ran Not Warranted 25 Central California Coast I:,,d,,,,,,•,rd _ Coho Salmon 26 Southern Oregon/Northem California I la. ,a, .4/ (0. ktrukh) 27 Lower Columbia River / lo,,,,,•,,, d • Critical habitat 28 Oregon Coast Not Warranted 29 Southwest Washington Not Warranted 30 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia 31 0 4'c Peninsula Not Warranted Chwn Salmon 32 Hood Canal Summer-run I1,, ■ ,,,,•,,. ,1 .. (0. keta) 33 Columbia River l h.,,a, ,,,.1 34 Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia Not Warranted 35 Pacific Coast Not Warranted 36 Southern California E /..,,I. ,,,,, -rd 37 Upper Columbia River i11.., ,,,l Steelhead (0. mykiss) 38 Central California Coast - //,....,.,,,/ 39 South Central California Coast /I,,,,,,r„r,l 40 Snake River Basin lh,:,arar4/ 41 lower Columbia River t tn,•,n•,,,,I 42 California Central Valley IIn.,,1.v,. di 43 Upper Willametto River //,,,,,,,,,,t/ 44 Middle Columbia River //,,.. rrrrd 45 Northern California 1I,1.,arnr,l 46 Oregon Coast , ■ eart a Concern 47 Southwest Washington I Not Warranted 48 Olympic Peninsula Not Warranted • Critical habitat 49 Puget Sounds • Protective Regulations 50 Klamath Mountains Province Not Warranted Pink Salmon (O. gorbareha) 51 Even -year Nw Warranted 52 Odd- car Not Warranted 1 The ESA defines a "species" to include any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife. For Pacific salmon, NOAA Fisheries considers an Evolutionarily Significant Unit, or "ESU," a "specie," under the ESA. For Pacific ateelhead. NOAA Fisheries has delineated Distinct Population Segments (DPSs) for consideration as "species" under the ESA 2 Updated final listing determinations for 16 salmon species were issued on June 28, 2005 (70 FR 37160). Updated final listing determinations for 10 West Coast Steelhead species were issued on January 5, 2006 (71 FR 834). On September 2, 2005, we issued final critical habitat designations for 19 West Coast salmon and steelhead species (70 FR 52488 and 52630). 3 Puget Sound ateelbead was proposed for listing as a threatened species on March 29, 2006 (71 FR 15666). MM List • • Page 1 of 2 ESA Salmon Listings Salmon & Hydropower ESA Regulations & Permits Salmon Habitat Salmon Harvest & Hatcheries Marine Mamm Salmon Recovery Planning Groundfish & Halibut Other Marine Species & Perml Home > Marine Mammals > MM List ESA- Listed Marine Mammals Under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries Service that may occur off Washington & Oregon: • Southern Resident Killer Whale (E), Orcinus orca • Humpback Whale (E), Megaptera novaeang /iae • Blue Whale (E), Balaenoptera musculus • Fin Whale (E), Balaenoptera physalus • Sei Whale (E), Balaenoptera borealis • Sperm Whale (E), Physeter macrocephalus • Steller Sea Lion (T), Eumetopias jubatus Under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries Service that may occur in Puget Sound: (E) = Endangered (T) = Threatened • Southern Resident Killer Whale (E), Orcinus orca • Humpback Whale (E), Megaptera novaeangllae • Steller Sea Lion (T), Eumetopias jubatus Regional Administrator: Bob Lohn 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115 -0070 206 - 526 -6150 Email: Webmaster or Content Manager Privacy Policy 1 Disclaimer 1 About Us Important Policies & Links Page last updated: January 12, 2006 ...4400:00-. lR I Advanced Search Search NOAA Fisheries Print Version Current Issues What's New About the NWR Species Lists Publications OIotogical Opinions Public Consultation Track na System (PCTS) Consultation Ipitlat4 Template Site Map http: / /www.nwr. noaa .gov /Marine- Mammals/MM- List.cfin 05/26/2006 Turtles List • Page 1 of 2 ESA Salmon Listings Salmon & Hydropower ESA Regulations & Permits Salmon Habitat Salmon Recovery Planning Salmon Harvest & Hatcheries Marine Mamm Groundfish & Halibut Home > Other Marine Species > Other Species > Turtles List Other Marine Species & Perml ESA - Listed Marine Turtles Under the jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries Service that may occur off Washington & Oregon: • Leatherback Sea Turtle (E), Dermochelys coriacea • Loggerhead Sea Turtle (T), Caretta caretta • Green Sea Turtle (E), Chelonia mydas • Olive Ridley Sea Turtle (E), Lepidochelys olivacea Sightings and strandings of these animals are very rare, and there are no breeding beaches in the Northwest Region. (E) = Endangered (T) = Threatened Regional Administrator: Bob Lohn 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115 -0070 206 -526 -6150 Email: Webmaster or Content Manager Privacy Policy I Disclaimer 1 About Us Important Policies & Links Page last updated: February 14, 2006 Advanced Search Search NOM Fisheries print Version Current Issues What's, New About the NWR Species Lists Publications Biological Opinions Public Consultation Tracking System (PCTS) Consultation Initlatb Template Site Mao http: / /www.nwr.noaa.gov /Other - Marine- Species /Other- Species/Turtles- List.cfm 05/26/2006 • • Page 1 of 3 LISTED AND PROPOSED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT; CANDIDATE SPECIES; AND SPECIES OF CONCERN IN WESTERN WASHINGTON AS PREPARED BY THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WESTERN WASHINGTON FISH AND WILDLIFE OFFICE (Revised December 20, 2005) KING COUNTY LISTED Wintering bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) occur in the county. Wintering activities occur from October 31 through March 31. There are five bald eagle communal winter night roosts located in the county. There are two bald eagle wintering concentrations located in the county along the Skykomish - Beckler -Tye Rivers and Foss River. There are 38 bald eagle nesting territories located in the county. Nesting activities occur from about January 1 through August 15. Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) occur in the county. Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) may occur in the county. Gray wolves (Canis lupus) may occur in the county. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos = U a. horribilis) may occur in the county. Marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) occur in the county. Nesting murrelets occur from April 1 through September 15. Northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) occur in the county throughout the year. Major concerns that should be addressed in your Biological Assessment of project impacts to listed species include: 1. Level of use of the project area by listed species. 2. Effect of the project on listed species' primary food stocks, prey species, and foraging areas in all areas influenced by the project. 3. Impacts from project activities and implementation (e.g., increased noise levels, increased human activity and/or access, loss or degradation of habitat) that may result in disturbance to listed species and/or their avoidance of the project area. Arenaria paludicola (marsh sandwort) may occur in the county. http:// www. fws. gov /westwafwo /se/SE_List/KING.htm 05/26/2006 • • Page2of3 Castilleja levisecta (golden paintbrush) may occur in the county. Major concerns that should be addressed in a Biological Assessment of listed plant species include: 1. Distribution of taxon in project vicinity. 2. Disturbance (trampling, uprooting, collecting, etc.) of individual plants and loss of habitat. 3. Changes in hydrology where taxon is found. DESIGNATED Critical habitat for the northern spotted owl has been designated in King County. Critical habitat for the marbled murrelet has been designated in King County. Critical habitat for the bull trout has been designated in King County. PROPOSED None CANDIDATE Fisher (Martes pennanti) (West Coast distinct population segment) Yellow- billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) SPECIES OF CONCERN Beller's ground beetle (Agonum belleri) California wolverine (Gulo gulo luteus) Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) Hatch's click beetle (Eanus hatchi) Larch Mountain salamander (Plethodon larselli) Long -eared myotis ( Myotis evotis) Long - legged myotis (Myotis volans) Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) Northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) Northwestern pond turtle (Emys (= Clemmys) marmorata marmorata) Olive -sided flycatcher (Contopus cooperi) Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Pacific Townsend's big -eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii) Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) River lamprey (Lampetra ayresi) Tailed frog (Ascaphus truei) http: / /www.fws.gov /westwafwo /se /SE_List/KING.htm 05/26/2006 Page 3 of 3 Valley silverspot (butterfly) (Speyeria zerene bremeri) Western toad (Bufo boreas) Aster curtus (white -top aster) Botrychium pedunculosum (stalked moonwort) Cimicifuga elata (tall bugbane) http:// www. fws. gov /westwafwo /se /SE_List/KING.htm 05/26/2006 3EP -20 -2006 WED 03 00 PM SEP- 20- 2006_WED•02:63 PM jet- WASHINGTON DIV. • WWashington state / Department at Transportation FAX NO, 3ga056822 FAX NO. 4 P. 01 P. 02 Local liency Environmental Classification Summary Federal Aid Project Numbor STP1?- 0099(077) _ Agency City of Tukwila wila Part 1 Protect Description r.rW /NlMMM Route Date Created Intent of Submittal 0099 3/2$12006 Q Preliminary pi Final [j Re-evaluate Federal Program Title 20.206 p 20.209 CI Other Project Title Tukwila Intemationa1 Boulevard Redevelopment Project - S 116th St to S 132nd St Begin MP KP End • MP KP Was KM 0,94 Townships 231 Rennes 4 E Seotions 9, 10, and 15 County Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) No. & Name King 09 Dawandsh • Green Project Description This project includes minor roadway widening while maintaining the same basin lane configurations, ACP overlay, and bus pullouts. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, signing, illumination, undergrotmding of overhead utilities, retaining walls, drainage (including high -ilovy bypass), traffic signal modifications, and interconnect, Within Puget Sound Basin? El Yes ❑ No IMI9 . IIWIX M-.-r Part 2 Environment®i Clusslficstion NEPA I:1 Class I - Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) IN Class 11 - Categorically Excluded (cE) CE Type (from 23 CFR 771,117) El Projects Requiring Documentation (Documented CE) (LAG 24,22) ❑ Class 111 • Environmental Assessment (EA) Progrrmmalic CE MOU SEPA j] Categorically exempt per IOC 197-11-800 CE Type (from SEPA Checklist) Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) b Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ❑ Adoption I] Addendum ❑ 6upplsmental Local Agency Approving Authority NEPA Approval Signatures 3 - -30 o Regional Loo '- rograms Epdineer /MelstentSecrete • Environmental Engineer I Highway Admin tratlon Date Date Complelnd By (Print Otrlciars Nettle) Robin Tischtnak, Project Rnginoet' POT Fenn 140.100 EF Faulted 3/2005 Telephone (Include area code) (206) 431.2455 Page 1 of 7 Fax (Include area coda) (2O6) 431.360 � Washington State II® Department of Transportation • Local &ency Environmental Classification Summary Part 1 Project Description Federal Aid Project Number STPF- 0099(077) Route 0099 Date Created 3/28/2006 Intent of Submittal • Preliminary ►i Final ■ .Re- Evaluate Agency City of Tukwila Federal Program Title e Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) e 20.205 • 20.209 • Other e Projects Requiring Documentation Project Title Tukwila International Boulevard Redevelopment Project - S 116th St to S 132nd St Begin MP End MP KP • Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA) Miles 0.94 Townships 23 N Ranges 4 E KM KP Sections 9, 10, and 15 County King Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) No. & Name 09 Duwamish - Green Within Puget Sound Basin? ►_I Yes • No Project Description This project includes minor roadway widening while maintaining the same basic lane configurations, ACP overlay, and bus pullouts. Other improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, signing, illumination, undergrounding of overhead utilities, retaining walls, drainage (including high -flow bypass), traffic signal modifications, and interconnect. Part 2 Environmental Classification NEPA SEPA • Categorically exempt per WAC 197 -11 -800 • Class I - Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) CE Type (from SEPA Checklist) ►:I Class II - Categorically Excluded (CE) CE Type (from 23 CFR 771.117) e Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) e Projects Requiring Documentation • Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) (Documented CE) (LAG 24.22) ■Adoption • Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA) • Addendum • Programmatic CE MOU • Supplemental NEPA Approval Signatures Local Agency Approving Authority Date Regional Local Programs Engineer / Assistant Secretary Date Highways and Local Programs Environmental Engineer Federal Highway Administration Date Date Completed By (Print Official's Name) Robin Tischmak, Project Engineer Telephone (include area code) (206) 431 -2455 Fax (include area code) (206) 431 -3665 DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 1 of 7 Part 4 Environmental Considerations Part 3 Permits and Approvals Required _ Yes No Permit or Approval Yes No Permit or Approval ozone, or PM10)? 014 Yes • No Is the exempt from Air Quality conformity requirements? • Yes 0 No (If Yes, identify exemption below.) project 2. Critical /Sensitive Areas - Identify any known Critical or Sensitive Areas as designated by local Growth Management Act ordinances. a. Aquifer Recharge Area, Wellhead Protection Area, or Sole Source Aquifer. If located within a sole source aquifer, is • 0.2 Corps of Engineers • Sec. 10 • Sec. 404 • 0 Shoreline Permit • Nationwide Type ❑ 0 State Waste Discharge Permit • Individual Permit No. • Ci Section 4(f) /6(f): Wildlife Refuges, Recreation Areas, Historic Properties • e Coast Guard Permit ► ' • TESC Plans Completed • 0 Coastal Zone Management Certification • 0 Water Rights Permit . • e Critical Area Ordinance (CAO) Permit ❑ ESA and EFH Compliance (See Part 5) ►=' • Water Quality Certification - Sec. 401 ■ Issued by D.O.E. • e Flood Plain Development Permit • e Tribal Permit(s), (If any) • e Forest Practice Act Permit ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval 0 Local Building or Site Development Permits ►:� • • ►_i Local Clearing and Grading Permit • 0 Other Permits, including GMA (List): 0 ■ Natl. Historic Preservation Act - Section 106 ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Baseline General for Construction ►�� ►0 • ROW Acquisition Required Part 4 Environmental Considerations Will the project involve work in or affect any of the following? Identify proposed mitigation. Attach additional pages or supplemental information if necessary. 1. Air Quality - Identify any anticipated air quality issues. included in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan? Yes • No Is the project If Yes, date Metropolitan Transportation Plan was adopted. 2/9/06 Is the project located in an Air Quality Non - Attainment Area or Maintenance Area (for carbon monoxide, ozone, or PM10)? 014 Yes • No Is the exempt from Air Quality conformity requirements? • Yes 0 No (If Yes, identify exemption below.) project 2. Critical /Sensitive Areas - Identify any known Critical or Sensitive Areas as designated by local Growth Management Act ordinances. a. Aquifer Recharge Area, Wellhead Protection Area, or Sole Source Aquifer. If located within a sole source aquifer, is project exempt from EPA approval? • Yes • No None. b. Geologically Hazardous Area None. c. Habitat. List known fish and wildlife species present and describe general habitat. None in the vicinity of actual construction. Existing storm drainage system discharges to the Duwamish River and its tributaries. The project site is not fish accessible and does not have any fish habitat. d. Are wetlands present within the project area? • Yes ■11 No If Yes, estimated area of impact in acre(s): DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 2 of 7 DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 3 of 7 Part 4 Environmental Considerations - Continued 3. Cultural Resources /Historic Structures - Identify any historic, archaeological, or cultural resources present with the project's area of potential effects. fit into the exempt types of projects listed in Sect. 24.82(a) of the LAG Manual? • Yes e No Does the project any of If Yes, note exemption below. if No: Date of OAHP consultation Date of Tribal consultation(s) (if applicable) Adverse affects on cultural /historic resources? • Yes e No If Yes, date of approved Section 106 MOA 4. Flood Plains or Ways Is the project located in a 100 -year flood plain? • Yes ►:l No If is the project located in a 100 -year floodway? • Yes • No yes, Will the project impact a 100 -year flood plain? • Yes ►.i No (If Yes, describe impacts and analysis conducted.) 5. Hazardous and Problem Waste - Identify potential sources and type. Is the project likely to involve site clean -up? • Yes e No Will the project create any hazardous waste? • Yes ►: No (If Yes, describe waste handling and disposal.) 6. Noise - Identify potential sensitive receptors or previous mitigation commitments. Briefly describe your impacts to the sensitive receptor, if present. None known. 7. Parks, Recreation Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Historic Properties, or Scenic Rivers /Byways, 4(f) /6(f) Lands - Identify any properties within the project limits and, if any are present, describe impacts to properties present. None present. DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 3 of 7 DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 4 of 7 Part 4 Environmental Considerations - Continued 8. Resource Lands - Identify any of the following resource lands within 300 feet of the project limits and those otherwise impacted by the project. Describe any impacts to any resource lands identified. a. Agricultural None. to be and unique farmland? • Yes • No If present, is resource considered prime If Yes, date of approval from Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) b. ForestlTimber None. c. Mineral None. • 9. Rivers, Streams (Continuous, Intermittent), or Tidal Waters a. Identify all waterbodies within 300 feet of the project limits or that will otherwise be impacted. Fisheries WA Stream No. 09.0001 Ecology 303d Report No. # 05 -09 -092 Reason for 303d listing Total PCB's; Sediments Date of Report 11/2/05 b. Identify stream crossing structures by type. One branch of Southgate Creek crosses in an 18 inch culvert. 10. Tribal Lands - Identify whether the project will impact any Tribal lands - reservation; usual and accustomed areas; or areas protected under treaty rights, such as fishing. None known. 11. Visual Quality Will the impact roadside classification or visual aspects? • Yes ►5 No (If Yes, identify the impacts.) project DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 4 of 7 • • Part 4 Environmental Considerations - Continued 12. Water Quality /Storm Water Has NPDES municipal general permit been issued for this WRIA? ® Yes ❑ No Amount of existing impervious surface within project limits: 16.54 Acres Net new impervious surface to be created as a result of project: 0.73 Acres Will this project's proposed stormwater treatment facility be consistent with the guidelines provided by either WSDOT's 2004 HRM, DOE's western or eastern Washington stormwater manuals, or a local agency equivalent manual? ® Yes ❑ No If no, explain proposed water quality /quantity treatment for new and any existing impervious surface associated with proposed project. 13. Previous Environmental Commitments Have previous environmental commitments been made in the project area? ❑ Yes ® No Describe commitments. If commitments are a result of permit conditions, identify issuing agency, permit number and date, and how commitments will be met. 14. Long -Term Maintenance Commitments Are Tong -term maintenance commitments necessary for this project? ® Yes ❑ No Identify. This project will construct new roadway related elements that will require long -term maintenance beyond the existing conditions. New curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage components, street lights, landscaping, and traffic signal interconnect facilities will require long -term maintenance. 15. Environmental Justice Are minority and /or low income communities impacted by the project? ❑ Yes ® No (If Yes, identify the impacts.) DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 5 of 7 Part 5 Biological Assessment and EFH Evaluations Answer ALL questions. Refer to the Part 5 Biological Assessment Checklist Instructions before completing this section. Permits 1. Are any of the following environmental permits, as indicated in Part 2, required: HPA, 404 wetlands, or local clearing and grading, shorelines, or permits related to critical or sensitive areas ordinances? Location ® Yes ❑ No 4. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of Puget Sound, Strait of Juan de Fuca, or the Pacific Ocean? 5. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any permanent or intermittent waterbody, which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody? 6. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any wetland, pond, or lake that is connected to any permanent or intermittent waterbody? 7. Does the action have the potential to directly or indirectly impact designated critical habitat for salmonids (including adjacent riparian zones)? Stormwater 8. Will this project's proposed stormwater treatment facility be consistent with the guidelines provided by either WSDOT's 2004 HRM, DOE's western or eastern Washington stormwater manuals, or a local agency equivalent manual? Construction Activities 9. Will any construction waste materials (e.g., asphalt or concrete grindings or byproducts, construction - related chemicals, fill materials, or excavated materials) from the project be disposed of at a location other than a permitted disposal site? 10. Will the project involve any in -water work? 11. Will the project effect the water regime of, or utilize any water from a waterbody, which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody; or any wetland, pond, or lake? 12. Will construction work occur outside the existing pavement? If Yes, go to 12a. 12a. Will construction activities occurring outside the existing pavement involve clearing, grading, filling, or modifications of vegetation or tree cutting? ❑ Yes ® Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ® No ❑ No ® No ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ® Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 6 of 7 2. Will any construction work occur within 0.5 miles of any of the following: 3. Does the project involve blasting, pile driving, concrete sawing, rock drilling, or rock scaling activities within 1 mile of any of the following? Bald eagle nesting territories, winter concentration areas, or bald eagle communal roosts? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • e • • 0 • Spotted owl management circles or designated critical habitat? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • 0 • • 0 • Marbled murrelet nest or occupied stand, or designated critical habitat? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • ►:4 • • 0 • Western snowy plover designated critical habitat? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • ►: • • 0 • Federal threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate plant species locations or documented habitat? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • 0:4 • • ►: • Canada lynx habitat? • Yes ►5 No • Don't Know • Yes 0 No • Don't Know . Gray wolf habitat? • Yes 0 No • Don't Know • Yes 0 No • Don't Know Grizzly bear habitat? • Yes 0 No • Don't Know • Yes ■: No • Don't Know Brown pelican night roosts? • Yes ■1i No • Don't Know II Yes ► i No • Don't Know Woodland caribou habitat? • Yes ►: No • Don't Know • Yes ►i No • Don't Know A mature coniferous or mixed fixed forest stand? Yes No Don't Know Yes No Don't Know • ► :4 • • 0 • 4. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of Puget Sound, Strait of Juan de Fuca, or the Pacific Ocean? 5. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any permanent or intermittent waterbody, which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody? 6. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any wetland, pond, or lake that is connected to any permanent or intermittent waterbody? 7. Does the action have the potential to directly or indirectly impact designated critical habitat for salmonids (including adjacent riparian zones)? Stormwater 8. Will this project's proposed stormwater treatment facility be consistent with the guidelines provided by either WSDOT's 2004 HRM, DOE's western or eastern Washington stormwater manuals, or a local agency equivalent manual? Construction Activities 9. Will any construction waste materials (e.g., asphalt or concrete grindings or byproducts, construction - related chemicals, fill materials, or excavated materials) from the project be disposed of at a location other than a permitted disposal site? 10. Will the project involve any in -water work? 11. Will the project effect the water regime of, or utilize any water from a waterbody, which supports or drains into a listed fish supporting waterbody; or any wetland, pond, or lake? 12. Will construction work occur outside the existing pavement? If Yes, go to 12a. 12a. Will construction activities occurring outside the existing pavement involve clearing, grading, filling, or modifications of vegetation or tree cutting? ❑ Yes ® Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ® No ❑ No ® No ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ® No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ® Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know ❑ Don't Know DOT Form 140 -100 EF Revised 3/2005 Page 6 of 7 Determination If all the above questions were marked No (with the exception of Question 8a.), or if any of the above items were checked Yes or Don't know, but an adequate justification has been provided to support a no effect determination, then check No Effect. If any of the above items were checked Yes or Don't Know (with the exception of Question 8a.), a biologist is required to conduct a review and evaluate the project; complete the section 7 consultation process per section 24.7 of the LAG manual. Note: If a biologist is required to conduct a review and evaluate the project, this does not preclude a no effect determination. NOAA Fisheries USFWS ® No Effect ❑ NLTAA Date of Concurrence ❑ LTAA Date BO Issued Date of First 6 Mo. Update Essential Fish Habitat Determination: ® No Effect ❑ Adverse Effect. Date of NOAA Concurrence Analysis for No Effects Determination (Required if any item in Section 5 was checked Yes). A Biological Assessment has been completed and submitted for WSDOT and FHWA approval. The conclusions of the Biological Assessment indicated that this project will have no effect on any listed species or essential habitat. Water quality components of the project far exceed what is required through the DOE and Highway Runoff manuals. Biological Assessment of this project has been combined with the report for Tukwila International Blvd. Phase 2, Federal Aid # STPF- 0099(077). One biological assessment was done covering both projects. Tukwila International Blvd. Phase 3 does not have a federal aid number as yet. - Part 6 FHWA Comments Use Supplement Sheet if additional space is required to complete this section. DOT Form 140 -100 EF Page 7 of 7 Revised 3/2005 Tukwila International Boulevard S 116th St ' to S 138th St Federal Aid Project # STPF- 0099(077) Section 106 Report Cultural and Historic Resources Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 2.0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS (APE) 3 4.0 AREAS OF POTENTIAL SOIL DISTURBANCE 3 5.0 VISIBLE AND AUDIBLE ELEMENTS 3 6.0 HISTORIC STRUCTURES, LANDMARKS, OR CULTURALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES 4 7.0 EFFECTS DETERMINATION •4 Appendix A — Original Map & Profile of SR 99 (2 sheets) Appendix B — Map of Retaining Wall Locations Appendix C — Color Plan Sheets Showing APE Appendix D — Photographs List of Figures Figure 1.1 Project Map 2 Figure 2.1 West Side Wall Details 5 Figure 2.2 East Side Wall Details 6 1 • • 1.0 Project Overview Tukwila International Boulevard is a principal arterial within the City of Tukwila that was formerly designated as a portion of State Route 99. In 2004, ownership of the roadway and right -of -way was transferred from the State of Washington to Tukwila. The limits of the roadway jurisdiction transfer extend from State Route 599 on the north to S 152nd St on the south. Since the early 1990's, when this area was annexed into the City from King County, Tukwila has planned to improve this segment of Tukwila International Blvd. The first phase from S 138th St to S 152nd St has been constructed. This project will construct the second phase of improvements extending from S 116th St to S 138th St. (See Figure 1.1.) The project proposes to improve existing roadway and pedestrian conditions along Tukwila International Boulevard to improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians in this corridor. Improvements will include the addition of curb, gutter and sidewalk, minor lane widening, new bus pull outs, and a pedestrian connection with the Duwamish River Trail. The proposed pedestrian improvements will provide a safe connection between the Duwamish River Trail and the completed Phase 1 improvements to the south of the proposed project. In addition to the roadway improvements, a new storm drainage system with water quality facilities and a high flow bypass system will be constructed in accordance with the 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (DOE Manual). , _ it l) I ,_____\\_ ' \ \/ ; �,= =i-: �Y.,- ,....r. -\ ,, 1,1 > % �\ r -1-11 1 / ' \ i1s 116 \ ,—' WYj jAv. \t ,- —�'�> ' \ i 1_, .I %, . 1 4-/ i S 128 ST \---- • _ HIGHLINE _ S 130 ST % .yam,' • .fit EC1ALTY, :+ 'C , �% • b' - CENTERI. \\ / g 1 1.- .Js115SI ` ' \-- c,I;'' 1 -N 1 ` - \<. ry / +' r r -- - - f FOSTER • i • Ii.._ -- 9 1� } I -I t 41 I N `COURSE J L�-� --1- _1---_I_tTUKWILA i– I 1— \'\ I____I___, H i_ y ; 1'/:: PROJECT LOCATION S142ST S144 ST —- T-- — T--1-- - -- Figure 1.1: Project Map SH4 ST_ r r— 1\ FORT\ 2.0 Legal Description The proposed project is located in the following 1/4 sections of T 23 N and R 4 E: NE 9, SE 9, SW 10, NW 15, and SW 15. 2 • • 3.0 Description of Area of Potential Effects (APE) As a general rule, the APE for this project is within the roadway right -of -way limits. The specific APE for this project is determined to be the clearing limits. The clearing limits identify the greatest extent of construction disturbance that is anticipated for the project. The APE (clearing limits) are identified on the attached plan sheets by a red dashed line. As indicated earlier, the APE is within the existing right -of -way. There are several locations where the APE is coincident with the right -of -way limit. At locations where the APE extends outside of the existing right -of -way limit, it does so only by a few feet at the most and does not impact any structures. 4.0 Areas of Potential Soil Disturbance This project proposes to reconstruct an existing street, including some widening for sidewalks, landscaping, and wider traffic lanes. The existing pavement width varies from approximately 60 to 70 feet. The new cross - section will vary in width from approximately 80 to 85 feet. This means that 65% to 80% of the construction area is within the existing paved roadway. The new, widened portion of the street cross - section will be constructed in the shoulder and slope areas adjacent to the roadway. The additional width will consist primarily of sidewalks, landscape strips, and retaining walls. Retaining walls will be required on both sides of the street at intermittent locations along the project. Soldier pile walls will be constructed on the west side of the street requiring excavation varying from 2 feet to 10 feet. This excavation will occur predominantly in cut slopes created when the roadway was originally constructed. Reinforced concrete retaining walls will be constructed on the east side of the street requiring excavation varying from 4 feet to 10 feet. This excavation will occur predominantly in fill slopes created when the roadway was originally constructed. (See Figures 2.1 and 2.2 for wall details.) 5.0 Visible and Audible Elements This project will add roadway elements that include pedestrian facilities and aesthetic components. No additional traffic lanes or capacity generating elements are included in the project. Therefore, no audible impacts to adjacent or nearby properties are anticipated, other than during the temporary construction timeframe. Visual impacts will be limited to some properties on the east side of Tukwila International Boulevard. Because the properties on the west side of the roadway are higher in elevation than the roadway, the new retaining walls will not be visible from those properties. Since properties on the east side of the roadway are lower in elevation than the roadway, some locations will face concrete retaining walls looking toward Tukwila International Boulevard. However, many of the wall locations on the east side of the roadway are not adjacent to developed parcels due to the steep terrain. These locations will also be the sites of the tallest retaining walls. Visual impacts are anticipated to be minimal. The project team will coordinate with the property owners most affected by the new retaining walls and mitigate those impacts to the extent possible. None of the properties are of historic or cultural significance. 3 6.0 Historic Structures, Landmarks, or Culturally Significant Sites This project will not impact any significant structures at all. No buildings or bridges are within the APE. No historic (or eligible) and/or cultural resources have been identified within the APE or in the areas adjacent to the APE. 7.0 Effects Determination This project will not impact any building structures, bridges, or any other potentially historic or culturally significant sites. Subsequent to a detailed review of the project site and the original roadway construction plans, it is apparent that this project could be exempt from further Section 106 analysis. It appears the Item "M" of exemptions likely applies to this project. Exemption "M" states: "Construction of turning lanes and pockets, auxiliary lanes (e.g., truck climbing, acceleration and deceleration lanes) and shoulder widening where only placement of fill material is involved, or within an area previously disturbed by vertical and horizontal construction activities." The colored plan sheets included in this report indicate that all of the area within the limits of disturbance for this project has been previously disturbed by vertical and horizontal construction activities. Effects Determination: No historic properties affected. 4 EXISTINIci SLOPE WEST VARIES 10' Figure 2.1 West Side Wall Details • c_ TUKWILA INTL BLVD 5 • • EAST 2' HIGH BARRIER W/ HANDRAIL 0 0 TEMPORARY EXCAVATING LIMITS HIGH FLOW BYPASS Figure 2.2 East Side Wall Details UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING • • APPENDIX A Original Map & Profile of SR 99 3 ROAD T E 3 N -F •4E - M 5W v4- 5\N1/4 CSEC- f►aM"15 C T 1 Y Y . ' . Cha ?. hppis. �9 9.}1gQ�A4Tj1 \ . ®� I� 13* \ W 0 L »A0 AR ADDMOI ' 83 rat•' -'" . • Ike. IrN• Co s;< Iva s SUfERSE.E STATION 46600 TO STATION • 471.00 SUPERSEDED BY SR 99, 5.144TH ST. VICINITY. SHEET 2 OF • . 2 SHEETS, APPROVED APRIL 7.1995 TA1E or w•UMINO•VNi STATE NIOMwur ONMIITLINT OVIYIPM, w•+11UMeror - MAP dd PROti•ILE OF SR -99 KING COUNTY •tuaww TO NYTTLI . It)tML NON. 1 IYOS •• .NO rs. 415111r•ttfCl• S, O R•ares� A•i -06 ro Oi Aproovoo. M . • " NOTE: For Detail* 4 Additional Ri9htof Way ace RsH.No1, 6 •• •Dto- 55.14.1105 -Ails s5H No.t- J- Channelizatllxr, approved May 41,1963. nng 3.18 Acres ' • ery • n Excavation 162500 CuYds Soli. Rock • 20 • • 5 lure • 150 • • Ov- hauhx100' 40440 • • • G • el Surfoung_ I- 0 • • e- Class . . �•20 • • • Rpe -lydam 39 LA Ft rao 14= rc V 1i VA VT.r cn ntrtzt,fl,t.t 5 e IR:TTS 14= Z. i ^r1r MTT11t7 <'ls�1crtzi �Tflia7;1rI III�:7n^Ja rs: ntra mMnv.sa 11 _ci:*+rt.r� «�rycsctyzrss- TC +�a_- 1�: Tan TMr- n fl .lna�i:r±�r,^*r.�z�csr.cz•.• :=::w_is1s1r.--.Lr:ri�;rr�• ,... -. t i rtryw .at. 4ti•1- O{ for Ms+ro iIH .40Ui • 4 Agra act Lots M- 1 +Oi913 br 04 1, MIS d • i •r-s 4.r• srt -Miw 4/t X411, .reee 4.a.io io�°uT 4ie * A .rn +t•e,sor. •• ors. Ntisrtse }N4• k. •00.• 7.40t•, +7` o f J 9.Mt ltfsws.N•w .iii, t1a. pt 4111�ost. NO•F1cTa,19_vrTlifTU s1Lt_ STATE STATE WSO rorwNr1.11rolrNNw • 811 EF{1 (I OF 15 BH EET8 • • • Cord. /Yo'. 98:4 VI 11112111:..1 . I !L-1 tir.t�l•2L11 �'r•"''- VIC ' :•1'L4'i•l:•111.t • lot.d T.tpa Carp. Lldls• UAW Trader Nola Clearingg ice 3.12. Acres .:._. .. ALL PLANS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PARTIES SEEKING PRECISE, CURRENT INFORMATION SHOULD CONSULT THE OFFICIAL PLAN ON Pu.E w TINE O&1. OF TRANSPORTATION IN OLYMPIA. • i1 :T- T3_1•rMPi #-s:1!- __SSX�iI•T. L r=11u-riandl:i Lai.. Lialfnl-> ,1.ss1uzrFLP LY�C!Y�= 7YCIIIZIE lir ,�lEalU4g.1747CF1R33CS- -1fiLSl- LAM Ti 77H :^,ITSiri-M=IMMINIMIIMEErms7E'- F1s�41 puce -n e. I1- -2'50 2'40 230 • \ 220 . 2L0 .2.00 290. 280 2.10 Stci 445+41 Rood AQproach : Corn Doric - I20 CuYds Grovel Surf -30 • Overhayi- e0 Cu•Yds,, • ' � k avatlon -8250 • 5olld Rock . • - 2A 5ta459i-44 Road'Approach Com Exsoss •100 CuYds Gravel Sur-P . -:::2A • • • Overhaul - 2320 •Cu;Yd6. ET L--NLA" , o xoo 1 } q� r `� 1 51-a.480435• A Flood Xing Conn. Excav- `L0Wou.Yds Grovel Surf.. - 20' .• • Overlou ^• 14S80 Cu.Y04 , Embankment-1480' • MILE Cleanng • 499 P►cres Grubbing C.tx� C Q s.cQvatlon 2b I0 Co ' ;g Cu.'. Solid •: • , . 50 • • st' . • ;I:,; 700 • • r ch Overhaul %100' • ' ;,. 118510 • • Grovel Surfacing 120 • • Concrete-Class-1V 112 8 • • Steel Relnf or • 12.380 Lbs. Plain Omc.Rpe- IDdiom. , . 60 Un.Fi • • -16 • ;}' 630 M1Z,q' 1.7/x' 2 i • • • Overhaul.- 95110 Cu•Y4s• Sta. 50543b • Rood X 9, Com•Ex4o., 59dCu.Yds . Gravel Surf -30 • • 'O H 6040 Cads, . • , ; I,'i:i•: • Common Excavation- 3160 Cu.Yds ' Common Excavation- 3040 CuYds• Corn. •Excosu - 1220.Cu.Yds• • Common Excavation -1200 Cu. Yds Common Excavation. 2630 CuNclo Excav -180 Cu•Yds: Co Excou -2030 C.L00 Loose Rock • •- I3100 • • ��� Loose Rock "- 8150 '• L.R. 3090 • '.• 1 • ♦ {•.� ��i - *�1�� « • Embonk.ment- 16830 • '• Emb -12.2 T- Embankment -4510 Embankment 1630 - • Emb-23 Emb. Embankment 2890 • • T 3 N: - 19..4:-ti I. •• v m• w Its lig 1)Ps8: ex I ; gb-zila it • Sec' /•a_ !/4 TI °^I H Voe - li PTA DUST ISTATE, NO I0 • FED AID PRO1 NO YEAR SHEET No TOTA L 3HEET8 YVASH• a.oM[ ) 1926 12. 5' CuWAM15H INK CO. IOUISE C. BE . g• 1 •/ Se T "1d>r1�9 -- t0TY Y UK B!/ LA Station 3 2.00io btatlon 5484OO Supo.•coded b.1 SR 99, So.11bth 4c*. SW 14. 1 -1( Appio.1ad July 2x,195 f E.! VI ilM61 rvfno7. Grubbing-0.52 Ac. idr' • 38 Ac. • b • ng0.3I AI:. • • I1 BIB t5�?S?7 T _ ram QTT.4u/N •Di9il�i'S�'.nr*�•?r� c� ::..� F. a- ' ��_ f3'� ' lrT fYiiikA -'fir 1 i1 smossaromm r:i• :a/ i`^ *-tTt 7P1C?rni:ia :rla !CL`: -3 7- ^• -1 -: Lt3 : -T11..r.•. 4•1 wIAr:n:tcrar..7aANIO.n .w• T4o 1 RoirWoneONner fps Corm ci+ed••i1X P } • - ni.pc Clearing.- 1.2.2 Acres .2540 • GK OTOCOUNTY BY DEED DATED WI w 0'r •. •..SS.. nYT.•I •T*? •••• •il••T, -. •. l• MAP & PROF'L : ■:+• smegmEENEEEE'..5R 99 'KINC3- COUNTY' saooroa TO *unto soma. h!'.L I I4 W(. A. -VIM 1 WON wnolrur. 4A$. o. ani 3 <.a .rr' *MR MKWWAT imam 11040 Rcvloed a Re'r? 4.1. .• _" i+s+ 2 OF13 1iI:I 4-ree • Givbbing- 2.93 Acres q . 1A . 1.t0 =mss •18u'1 1• • ..-sNu -1: 1 -1 OR riZZll Y3mo=avfiCZ:3L • I' • ter ALL PLANS ARE S118.ECT TO CHNIOE. PARTIES SEEKING PRECISE. CURRENT INFORMATION SHOULD CONSULT TH8 OFFICIAL PLAN ON FILE N THE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION N OLYMPIA. too C1tIWl�LTIIONII;tvefl E+GZ' • 56941. -1. ;. 120 : • 190 • 1B0 110 160 . 150 1•0 130 itckElcay. w• 45 100 . no •160 150 110 100 90 ' C to *twine � pitch bau 30Cu ds 80 TO 10 • 120 110 I00 60 .50 it 2 40', 5to•509N95 Rood Xing Com.Excav -220 Grovel Surf.- 20 Overhaul ,. Cu.Yds • • 5ta5I6 +75 Sta 519+24 Rood png Race king. CAm Bor_. CuYds.ComExccN -60 CuYds. Grnvel5uf.-30 • • Grave.15urf -2D • •. • Overhaul- 2690 CuYds 30 M c,„ • N 500•' • • pa: 0.00% 20. &Ad SbCk mmon:E xfccxacavvogtaonri - CommoFaceuv of loo -52 30 C.u.1(ds PI' I Loose ROCA( • Embankment -'1050 • Embankment = 'mit 804 T s 9 610 -1 3 4 5 6 T 6 9 520••1 2 Overt•cul -• 90 Cu.Yd� F Overhaul -20 C`dq_. • 50 Cu. 8alid 0Ock Elwavai'ion 100: r.u.Yds. 5410 Cu. Yds Cornrnon ExcovolloM -3110 Cu•Yds 84 0 * Loose Rock " - 3529 • • • 565 I . • Embankment- 8800 •••. • • 74 5 4' 1 N! 9 Goo 1 T. Overhaul-3050 C.u.Ydr. • idbek60 -avn Cu 20o .. . UDTTTOr1 Excaval10n•- •aril( Loose Back •. -•.: 5F6t • • • Em brio kment -519O" 6 9 54o i 1 Overhaul - 61100' Cu-`ids SAL sips . 40 . 30 al.Borrow 3cld tick �i c t a+ipn. 300 Cu. • • . Common; E ca'o on -'t980 CirY . • ' ' • Loose Rock 11960 " . 4 8 to • T B 9 530 Ehibonkment -.121479 !• • 'Embpnkment� 13130 -. ?' �' 3. �uYOS... , 1 1 :2 . 3 4 ' . l .. •f► _ e 9.: - 5f10':.i ..1. • e. .:I-. ..5 .. 6 _ ...17.I `e;-:"...' • 9' •. •• ;:.a a . APPENDIX B MAP OF RETAINING WALL LOCATIONS 81,000 RIVER. t ir 111kIL 1� �iV�*H� �� �i la .\ .4 ‘-- -- ■ i i ; 6 riAEP•;IrliTL Mgr .19 Si i r!la i "." 'k7-kak AlliVair . --\10 r_lk k - • \`\ 11 ' o� Ilk \��. - malt 10 1 �� ate: °o ��IJi:\ v\ 155 9 10 ������81•���m�I I �� )I ) 16 15 I N 181, 76914 • APPENDIX C Color Plan Sheets Showing APE MIZTtral GENERAL NOTES SrTE PREPARATION NOTES 1. 1115 PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FCe DE CP/TRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE IN LOCATII14 PROTECTING NM MOOING CAti1N:15 619 ER5I06 U1UI1IES. IT 6 RASED UPON BEST ALOILOaE INFORMA1I011 MD 6 NOT NEQ.SSARLY ACCURATE CH COIPHEIE 2 OVERHEAD POSER UNF5 ARE NOT NECESSAALY 94061. E7J•RaSE E %IRFLE CAUIICI MEN 90IE9IG IN PRCCOTY TO AERIAL POMER UNES. 1 ABAHIDan STORM DRAIN PHPE SHALL BE M180.0 MUD 8004 CDR a. APAROAI/AIE CIFNRIG HD41S ARE 910801 ON TIE PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING LIMITS 9141 BE STAKED BY THE C 116990TEIR AND APPROVED BY ME ENC1Ffl. OI REMOVE E100000 CURB. 1© REMOVE CATCH BA911. 1© REMOVE STORM DRAG PIPE ExtST1NC� Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope $tST1NG CONCRETE OR ASPk%AL -r PAVEMEWT Imo s _ ...* CLEARING uHATS dumb - oim• owe R I6,4-r - tic - W Ay u 3 F u n o- F v °` "` ■ P UBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING. STREETS *WATER • SEWER •BUILDING• Y by date KpG TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD to 60�o REVIEW SUBMITTAL fi•0 - E 16 E3 MI hated KC 6/05 SITE PREPARATION PLAN goje0� it AD vro w '°'° 11.1 Rae os 611 r,ad �m STA 146.00 TO STA 149 *00 oA dale naimm date woos 1613 12'0• 5,6'58 CWT \ \ I SLOPE W3 ±516 • _ 5' cilwn in7.r 1,j 1 .\ :E 3 131.: ti1.: 3 \, NNW CLEARING APPROXIMA LMTS (1 16 w "85 3 .Jat a%x Aa ni., 2: E.::?.; V ,E 2:3.3' N. a- 0 \- \ •*— F TT"...g-..-flr 5 ' 5 l EP �-z /—CONS 151 151 \� RL 152 15�; \ K )h __3_J / 7--SANCUT UNE (TIP) L 25' A0-4545 SNn :; -1 ._r -22t -____:::-"--"---------.-1 ' 1r11' 1 11 / 0 5 10 20 40 60 SCALE M FEET Lt t PAVEMENT 1. GENERAL NOTES DNS PLAN HAS BED1 PREPARED FOR 1)$ CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE 04 LOC■TING. PROTECTING, AND AVERTING CONTll0I5 WITH EASING UIURIES. IT IS BASED IRON BEST AVAILABLE NFORIIADON AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. 2. OVERHEAD POTTER TINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY STON. DUETTE EXTRDIE CAUTION WHEN WORKING 01 PROI21071 TO AEIOAL POTTER LDIES. 3. ABANDONED ST01a1 DRAIN PPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY FRIED NTH CDF. 4. APPROXIMATE CLEARING UNITS ARE SHORN ON THE RAN. ACTUAL CLEARING IRO15 SHALL BE STAINED 8Y THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 01 R 110)8 EXTRUDED OMB. 02 10)10VE GIARDRNL 1Q REMOVE CATCH BASH. TQ MIME STERN GRAN PPE. 14 41010E STREET LIGHT POLE 6XISTtNen Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope Storm Drain Facilities tLL_ Soo PE / EXIST11iU STORM bRPI%NAGE FAc1 L MES •■■• — 1•■0 45■• (_I.EAQIN61 1_tMrrS — some anmemm• �16.HT -6F- WA4 PUBLIC' WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• spG Aechllacimee 0er•.w er01 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 149 +00 TO STA 154 +00 me N ammo ak AS SUN date 'axe 1, 70 OlAat 2992 1LZ CB 73 1i7 • CI 3749 22.71' i 722 C It C•4: Y Dar 45 fUAi GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS PLAN NAS BEEN PREPARED RR 1HE CONTRACTOR'S C7062KNCE w LOCATw4 PROTECTING. AND WAXING CONFUCIS WITH COSTING MMES. IT IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR CONFIDE. CNERNFAD POWER LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY 48010E E]EROSE ORME CAUTION 84194 MORK0NO IN PROXIMITY TO AERIAL POMER ONES ABANDONED 5TEMI DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY FRIED WITH CIF. {. APPROID/ATE CLEAR= U6IIS ARE $NOON ON THE PUN. ACTUAL CLEARING 1214115 SHALL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE E1402CER FALL SL.oPE SITE PREPARATION NOTES Q REMOVE MIMED a>Ae. 0 REMOVE GUARDRAIL 0 REMOVE FENCE © REMOVE CATCH BASIN. 0 REMOVE 570R11 DRAW PIPE 0 5 10 20 40 $CAME IN FEET EXISTINGI No AS PH PrLT ?MEN ENT Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope Gravel Surface 3119941M4 P - - GRAVEL DRWEW CLEAR%►IG Linn ITS .m.. ass. s ism RIGl•rT— OF— WAi 3 F IL 0 o- t v PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING* dtained drum toted WIC cot a•R dir field bk m LPG Analdlaeler4 - 9.e, 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 154 +00 TO STA 159 +00 12 168 ®6 Y 032991,0 6032 As 9212 b32 woos 1 -1 24 33, VITG73,".. 1.2" . : ■C'e / Ste.". 3. 12- :CNC / .053.3.3. 13' 0311: / / / ■&.1.1:: • •Ii•/ • CAW. 2 234 MM. MM. G,RPISIEL DR %NAM / PAR .1(a 2■333' C.'0 321%4.3'S 3", 01t3.4 - r"."215 "*•!!:"' 7314.e 3. 44" CCM.: APPROXIMATE CLEARING UNITS (TIP) ASPS 111111111111... t- •="C C LA 1" 173 ve E., 23.0 SLOPE \ 8 Y , - ' \ i i \ I 161 , sucuT LINE (ryp) \ ELfr&I., 1 - \ -, J 1 a zam c 1. eata. \ l:,."' 1 1 21,1.3. S. 12; .3",g, 401./...... ., 0 I .8 t) \ 0 " / - !Or -----,... ........:.......... .... __ • - - - _.!. F, '.--•-■ _.7.:_i..-,,, - ------ n. ....• . .....„-,-- - ------..--------,; "//.• .,....._.........7...-- . _C. --.._41midrAin.. i.. I., < , 2,3." ?AOC11 043 504150 7 4WD 4WD 4.1•401" ••••••• I30131 Ca 32 RD YAM' 11117.13. "2" CNC C 710.5' GENERAL NOTES 7 04045 Cow 403 30445 ASP4-1#11-71- PANE meNT 1. DOS PLAN HAS EMI PREPARED FCR THE CONTRACTOR'S CCNVEMENCE LOCAPNG. PROTECING. Me MIMIC CONFUCTS MTH DOSING 011115S. IT IS BASED WON BEST AVAILABLE RIFORMADCW AND IS NOT NECESSARLY ACCURATE CR CCIRETE 5 OVERHEAD POND ONES ARE NOT NECESSARILY 910811. EXEROSE MOUE aultor, MEN VARKING 11 PROMOTY TO AEA& POVER 1 ABAKIDNED STORM DRAIN PPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY FAIED 511H CDF. 4. APPROXIMATE WARING LOOTS IRE SHORN 30 1160 PIM. ACTUAL CLEARING LIMOS 902L BE STAKED BY 1HE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE &MEER 3. SITE PREPARATION NOTES /MK J. L".3) 0 REMO* GUARDRAIL 0 580)5 3051 0 REMO* POST. • FONOVE COMTE PAD. • R1340* amaxErE Rumex NAIL MOVE CATCH BASK CV RUCK STORM DRAIN PIPE. EXIST I 06 1 Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut/Fill Slope Gravel Surface FILL_ tOP 0570 20 40 arALABZEI ammo - •Www• IMPEND C.L.E.ARINI 60 L-i AA crs RIbmer - oF - \NIA"' F'WEILIC WORKS T • ENGINEERING• STREETS• WATER* SEWER • BUILDING• by date deeped 6/60 Iran 6/05 abated 6/03 yorj end 111 060 pi r field bk oa ICING Areallestare Yettleeatare awe 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 159.00 TO STA 164.25 MINI■IMM!IIME 3 04 68 file no OZMPREPO sole 456111111 date saws 6L1:TN. Cat 1 Y te`a' Eh %I RocK W ALL / C5: CuT SLOPE .9 .N] Lw ria :a5.i's. IYc ■6.a0 6: fi 1.55' 1.:' - 'Ji;c 4. c / /ip : / • / / 6 GENERAL NOTES 1» :. M .... AIMED AIEM• MEM, II■1I■ 0510 20 40 so I. DVS PLAN HAS BEM PREPARED RR DE CONTRACTOR'S CM6DIENCE N LOCATING, PROTECTING AND AVOIDING CONFUCTS ETH EXISTING UTSIDES. IT IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR CONFUTE 2. 00F]OEAD POSER UNES ARE NOT NE(ESSAR0Y SHORN. CEROSE COND E CAUTION S E71 6PoONG N PRS)]OITY TO AERIAL POVEIt S. ABANDWFD STORM DRAW PIE 910{)_ BE ENTIRELY RUED 11111 COF. 6. APPROXIMATE CLEARING LIMITS ARE 910110 90 THE PLAN. ACTUAL OFARNG L1015 SHAM BE STA01D BY THE CONIRACTTW AND OPPROND BY DE ENONEIIt IP+ SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 RUM GUARDRAIL 13 REARM CATCH 8050. 13 REN06E 5101611 BRAN PIPE Ext STI N4 Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope Rock Wall P UBLIC WORKS DEPT. • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER• SEWER •BUILDING. date 6/05 6/05 6/05 6/05 FILL SLOP E 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT Cuff P 11.1 - SI.LoPE CLEPRIIJG LIMITS e - sow or RI&wr— OF—V61NNY TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 164 +25 TO STA 169.00 14 166 Q 3 F IL 0 o- F 0 Lae 85090414 sale As 0665 date woos J Cut SLO PE axis-L-106, RocK W � V�-- ma+ 22:1 AN u.n • , .. 'ear 5E. ■5 4252. 7 :516 to 2r E :220 0A 14• \' • 'K \ , ••b , 20.,, 2153 rt‘r 84114, 15•Ccrelitab £ 121., A- 15' iOF 1 7040 2 1512 ON '5516 14 •112 Si. 'e' 02.: a': Tr. k :52.2 5E 22' =A; ' :3.. :2c* ILLY 5. S'P'2 * 2713 S 4,5150 It 2S LIMN.4 1315. tSTIN61 • ro 2592 1 4012 5 \ \�/ /a /// i iil ./ um a...'::Zr ti Ens 122 aaC Ft xN 2255 St PE � • e• sa. se' s!=; �112 nT r 5r2S GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS PUN RAS BEM PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CCODENONCE 01 LOCAING. PROTECTING. AND AVOIDING CONFLICTS KITH MISTING U15J1E. IT 6 BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE IL60W141101 AND 6 NOT IECESSARLY ACCURATE OR COYPIETE. 2.OVERHEAD POKER LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SNOW. 02BR0SE USSR CAUTION 111E11 WORKING N PRO:MITT TO 07070E POKER LINES 3 mown STORM ORAN PIPE 53011. BE D1RNFLY FILLED 06711 ON. 4. APPROAWTE C EARD6 U1015 ARE WORN ON 06 PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING LINTS STALL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE DOOR. 1212. k :.SC' SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 RD/00E GUARDRAIL • 0 MOVE 8002 WALL 0 MOW GWB. OUIIER. AND SIDEWWL. 0 MOVE 1ODIAN. © REILOS12 coat BASOL. R9104E STORY IRAN P@E EXISTIel6, P.T :Mr WANNA• MAMA OMEN NM. —J� 5.162 r OW/ 0 us: rwtz 178 /.1 ASP kiALT PAVEMEan' Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope Rock Wall O4 4'3400¢ • • • • • FILL SLOPE 0 5 10 20 40 SCALE FEET 168 G1.EkIZIN41 1-1, FAITS ... AMR■ — 12,164-r- of - `14A*1 Q J F u a o- F v • P UBLIC WORKS DEPT. • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• by date de 6/05 dun 6/05 decked NO 6/05 PNI eiz KO 6/05 PRi dir add u 00 ICING CFO 10 . 0 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 169 +00 TO STA 174 +00 Is 168 Se es 723SNR5 eoIe AS 9104/11 dale 6/2005 al an Pal 1:]ln I.QYI� P.0 L a tear 4. R'CDY` t 154.7 AE 1t GCkC 1 a n]/ P_v KN1f a NSC SE 1]'/C E3E0>a� :K E N4.]'4. r 2:16216 �, S'S. 519'`c.R'F. .Y E 5'h: Jj :0 N99 \I :2� 1 targ6'P•:t Ii:.6' E s >•s' \� ' 2772 _ 77 110 1i! 7w 1t] Rao H5•( E 776: S .n> (:10 F2rra) rt :617 SA 4 ..\ \, 77'.716 CF. \\\ 14i-U 1:p.^n0 4.1 ma VP CG / RRNT -OF -WAY • 00 • F'L- SI -0PE. Y GENERAL NOTES ,. 1105 PUN HAS BEEN PREPARED RN THE CONTRACTOR'S CONWNSICE IN LOCATING. PROTECTING. AND AW0NO C1NFUCIS NIH MONO UILRFS IT 6 BASED UPON BEST AVANATE NFORNAIION AND LS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR COMPLETE L OVERHEAD PONER IVES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SNONI* ETERCISE EXTREME CAUT,OM NEH NONOIG N P0010151Y TO AURAL POWER LINES ABANDONED STORM MAIN PIPE SHALE BE ENTIRELY FILLED NTH CIF. N. APPROXIMATE 0.0086G LOOTS ARE SHORN ON THE PUN. ACTUAL CILVNG LIMNS STALL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE DICKER cuT / FILL. SLOPE SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 REMOVE EXTRUDED CURB. 0 REMOVE IOIARDRAe. 0 mum POSE 0 RENOVE CONCRETE PAD. 0 REMOVE CONCETE RETAINING WAIL 0 REMOVE OURS, CRIERS AND SNEWAUC 0 REMOVE (7004. SASH 10 REMOVE STORM IRAN PIPE Inosh Ps13 SCR as v< 0 5 10 NU 40 6D ` (.2^ ME1..- SCALE M FEET DRIVEW it`( Exls- tab Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope Gravel Surface FILL SI.oPE 3 EX is-111./6r Goo c eTE OR ASPHALT QAV EMEN ?, •- - P•do CLE P 2 I n1 C06 L I M rrs "" - dMINIP R - OF - v1/41 144 .P UBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING. STREETS•WATER• SEWER •BUILDING • Wary. s.r. 0 . o...• 0.•P 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 174.00 TO STA 179.00 168 016 Be 0293005 ale A5 von date NJ2006 iPPROOMATO QFARPIG.UNITS (TW) f Slo E - ose a. IMP INO, PRVEMENT _ RAy -- - - - -- _ - - I 5, f'iS 14 — \`... _ ...� NQ \ ■ \ SL,oPE • l• e" GENERAL NOTES I. 115 PLAN WAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVUNe1 E IN LOCATING, PROTECTING AM MOOING CDOUC1S WITH E7OSOMG MIRES. R IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORIUD01 AND LS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE Ct COMPLETE 2. OVERHEAD POWER LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY S10O1. E7OROSE ORREME CAUTION MIEN WINING N PROIDIOTY TO AERIAL POWER LNES 1 ARAM00NFD STORM ORAN PIPE 91401 BE ENTIRELY AILED DIN CDF. A. APPROIDMAIE GEARING UNITS ARE SHORN ON THE PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING LIMITS FULL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. i SITE PREPARATION NOTES OI REMOVE E010040 D CM. Q REMOVE GOARDRAL © REMOVE CATCH BASH. © RLNOVE STOW GRAIN APE EXI ST' 1144 Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut /Fill Slope O s 10 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET •— ••. LLE. 2114 LIMITS IMO r IMMO R t&t T - OF - vJ P UBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING • STREETS •WATER• SEWER • BUILDING • h dtAufd dun Bile 11NIIWI ND 6/05 IN ILO 6/06 N�N dv TNN bk KPG Yailmesono 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 179 +00 TO STA 184 +00 17 168 me 00 NSS6IFO AS 9040 date 6/1005 r cue nrecoc t \ \ / I" / ; - ■,..1‘. oc,?(...y V' i '–.:A " C< i 1 - 1 IiA i v ''...- ..„ „......,, a8,Afg 11 ' .r,. M=,I.;: . •4..0 .pf . 14,4,: 0 / 4/ / i ,!: -- k 4 % ! i 1 I f•..21 j, I tik..._.07.,<,.:4,..2,,. ., . .......:.. :,.., ------- F ------------- s. / '4 CtAl. sLoPe 6R Et- RNEW `1 ( 4E. .1; , • 1..y 1402 .1t. 1,413' • • Z ir .242 12 Cr, 0242" /O. ..C425 . • so s -- - - - - RIGHT-Cr-WAY 187 SAW= UNE (TTP) 188 r-1 ___., -.-----:---- ../-:':....----------.."..-..' ■ ___..:----'-'- .--r. 4-14,-Y,A.---"-------- -'4" • "....,;- ,42 7 W1 \ \------• , GENERAL NOTES / / ..artta—vm.Ins. 19633 1. THIS PUN 1445 86201 PREPARED FOR DIE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE 44 LocAnNc, PROTECTING. MD AVOIMIG UCTS MTh COSI= UTILITIES. IT IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFOITMTIO■ AND 5 NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE CR COMPLETE 1 OVERHEAD POWER LIES ARE NOT NECESSARILY 910614 MOSE CORSE CAUT14SI *EN viaacmc 01 PROMIIITY TO AERIAL POYER UNES. 1 ABANDONED ST06111 DRAIN PK SHALL BE ENTIRELY FILLED NTH CDF. APPROMIIATE [TEARING LIMITS ARE %OWN 40 4186 PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING TARTS SHALL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 ROME EXTRUDED curs. C) REMOVE cumoRAL C) PROTECT GABON REDA= WALL • d.1 P LLB LIG' WORK S DPIP T. • ENGINEERING•STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• r% LL PE 0510 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut/Fill Slope Gravel Surface 224 0414' E 1343 K. I? 66404 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL RIM 135.1r LC. MO' S. I? PVC LE 1369. 44. LL" PVC APt4A1.--i- PAve_mEm-r 411••••• ONIAMID 411•11•41 e I /4 61 Li tA S maw Ir. woe mom R16441" — OP — \Ai A‘l TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 184+00 TO STA 189+00 18 168 tile es 022591:248 scale AS Rauh dats 'nom R MEL CLkI bit iv EVJ 1,5 i• !,91 Eft!' `E_ 8,1•••S 51+ '• 2? 82' •• • lig.; ;2: CS" ■21.4.1 IS18 • ••• ,••• . EMS. t.k1 / .8 • - °••• \\N .182.8;+18.,ir CLEARING LAIRS (TTP)-- GRPIEL- DIRwEvikl Sr, :Ate. \ 43 3M 11441330 • / HIE• %. Cu, / C888:38.17: It> • • :CPC IMMO 00101i, eson omm ASPNALT PAVS mf-Nrr 60 04.1$ .4.8.• 12.1r MC B r GENERAL NOTES uk1.7"sr• I. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR IRE C5041RAC1OR'S CONYDRENCE 61 LOCATING PROTEETING. AND AVOIDING coNFUCTS 111111 EXISTING UTIUDES. 18 15 BASED UPON BEST AYMLABLE Aft RuAnON AHD 25 NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR ccmPLETE 2. OvERHEAO PovER uNES ARE NOT NEcEssmuLT sRtom. ExERDSE EaRDIE CAUTION *EN %06I= IN pROmily 10 AERIAL POYER uNES. ABAAMONED STOMA ORAN PIPE Boa BE MTN:LT IWO 11114 COF. 4. APPROMIAll WARING 24015 ARE WWI Cm 111E PUN. ACTUAL ClEARING MOTS SHALL BE STAKED BY THE CCAITRACTOR AND APPRC11812 BY THE DOWER Ls W32 ‘2' 35 yr NYC • SITE PREPARATION NOTES (3 REHM CATCH BASRA 13) MACK STOMA ORAN PIPE r 211112112221 8,4 3+8332 03 1581 1831 123.79' 412.0 we. 0.Ne E 22.08. 10 MEC exts-r, 01, Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut/Fill Slope Gravel Surface Le_ 1060- • Ave — 0530 20 40 60 cr.A10 50 FEET CL.E.A1Z taEo 1...-I CH LINE STA 194 +00 SHEET 20 50 am. Isom ••• RI awr - op - v,) poi PUJEIL,IC WORKS D11 T. • ENGINEERING•STREETS.WATER•SEVER•BUIIINNG• SD Gate 4/05 4/05 6/05 ILO 6/05 ICIPEG Alawbilactim• Loeb,* Arelleb.ora 0(41 111...•111141 ONDoas 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 189+00 TO STA 194+00 1698 63 61 0e0yeste sule As geoes dale arms .1 CAM- ct L P P E Sm, 3434 ImaK F ..12S a' Ce -11.1 14.1 nx. .* 30041 5L CatC immea. G•o 1.7"••••••••• a ,754 :aid' • 5122234 •,, Em.i," a- 24" C,..0 . 343 1304: • 051 Ex. E- Cdo: / / 1m.c rm. 20 G,C i C 11:3- E. 1r acc ,Lc 4. COM CM / / 0 112.0 ,m: s' 04, , / 0.14FOr.E .... 411 ir- MANIC •cul i qII.10 sou , u ,J:tEr.: il ,T.1 P.- p- V MO , .,.. ,,, , • 4 ,-.,I' KA- l' "r, /..f_c.ct,...,./77 2: :,...:s..,/... .. / ,..-... i Or411:j. lir"..1r7 ...7. ...-- ,-- 5441 1232 C MS*. :06.4. a MA So :Sr am■ io.4.3' E Ciar. 14a309 104.:• 04 IV Oat APPROXIMATE \ , 8 iSt'l4 A LT % , cLEMBNC 19405 (110) \ ''' o _ pANI E k■Sirr /9 \ 1 /—"NN1222744% \ ) 91,96 i I I I AC ) i I 1 / SPc4 Ea3 ..., • / i L _/ , ,.... --- I : 7--4.441.A.1111.' i,,... ,. ..i,...-----Ii°11111-•"-----'' -.7...V.--- %Orr', .411112,...1, 11111111114, MIM 4. 03-tNets04 0PTS5 OITZ-1 I C am \ 34 ‘30.5* E 1".......s........t I CS 47 ii .1 1.7.se / 4013 3- hm. tre,,,te CC, Cr.rkEilitb cs 0.1 1-15t?;•".1 GENERAL NOTES 0560 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET I. DRS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR NE CONTRACTOR'S COMMENCE LCCAPNC. PROTECTING, AND AMONG CONFLICTS MTh DOMING UTILITIES 0 tS elso UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION MO 15 NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR COuPLEIE 2. OVERHEAD POSER LINES ARE NOT 900.5513900 191061634 DIRCISE EXTREME CAUTION SHEN ISORKING IN PROXIMITY TO AERIAL POSER UNES. 1 ABANDONED STORM DRAW PIPE SHALL BE 017500 -621125) TAM COE 4. APPROXMAIE 0.019910 LINTS ARE WAIN ON NE PLAN. ACM& 020.610110 346015 SHALL BE STAKED BY 162E CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED SY DIE ENGINIM. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 REMOIE EXTRUDED CURB. 0 MOE FENCE © MOVE STORM DRAIN PIPE EX1•511pJA 1 02411 :03; 24149450 mar -•••••&._ammio qw, UT di O. .1. " • • • 1 t9gg° 1 1 414 • IWO 111111..... A 5 4 Concrete or Asphalt Pavement Cut/Fill Slope •■■ OM=Mr 031=111 CLE I PG. LA IA% TS am. am. am. aim - or - v4/41 cur / FILL st-o PE CoaCRETE _PUBLIC WO I? ICS E' Fa T. • ENGDIEERING•STREETS•WATER•SETER•BUILDING• 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 194.00 TO STA 199.00 20 168 8061 023196139311 Kale AS 910611 date woos CH / / trol., 03.9,5 i 1 i 1 APPROXIMATE .. : NIV. 12 CCnt a S•S 2. IT C..,IS 1 r warm WITS (nil 1 ft...0.cl ,...- ,45/.. ..,S ' k:.., :MESS e■ kaiNh .- "6"Ae=e7"--.. -...—......„. rS2.2 s..4 S3.11' aa, CSTS: SS.S 2 IT a'Sr•C Si-4f) PE 1111111111111111---110t-iii., 2 ins SWIMS ■ a SIS' Wt. 1r CCet / 1 SIC SE. IT Mt a 2u. /kV are-- 2 2,3S a ilS Va. s. . q CSS KS rz. an: am 97.at / ... MT I a 5ST X. IT COM / a , k 937 ss. q• c.,.., / 5 nr :05 .2- Cara CCAIC I .litt , / A \ ' :.6.....A0,70 ,% 1 .6,64 * , y smicur INE (Iw) .,. _ i ---0, _.7 , .- z - i-----1 ,A..' A , ---,,t.----- I 1 ==',...■....,,.......,..,.e. ,. • ,, , ' -....... , ...■:,"1.- 0 '. .j\s.'"t.,...,.....7 4r..!..„.• r■ .a.,....., " .. i 1 ----- 101- -------..---- -- - a V - - —203 ...,, 1 1 1 i -1 -''''■.,,..N._ .--':, _ A _t_ ------------------------ ' ''''- -------------------- 1-"-c; ----------- -1,-, ■ ,-- - \ - ---..._ --------------- I__ __ : --------------------------------------------------- \ , . 4,4 .......■ -. \ L, ,..) --.....u. ro C.4 GENERAL NOTES 61 1. 1145 PLAN HAS BEM PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE 61 LOCATING, PROTECTING. AND AVOIDING CORIUM 16114 D511NG UTLIITES. IT 5 BASED UPON BEST AVALARE INFORMATION AND IS NOT HECESSARLY ACCURATE CR COMPLETE OVERHEAD POTLE:R LINES ARE HOT NECESSARILY SHOW CcERCISE COMTE CANTON MEN yocRoNC 6 PR0110Mly TO AERIAL POOR IMES. 3. ABANDONED STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY FRIED MTH COP. 4. APPROXIMATE WARMS Ulan ARE MOM ON IRE PUN. ACTUAL ClEARING MOS SHAU. BE STAICED BY TNE CONIRACICR ARO APPROVED BY ME ENGINEER. SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0510 20 40 60 5rALE IN FEET o 806196 06.01610091 CURB. 0 491040 TREE EXIST/ 0C., Cut/Fill Slope Gravel Surface Ca Ft kV EL- Me-b• Pc1.1 MIND •■•■• - NMI& CLEARI 6.3L18 L.l ov■ t-rs am= ammo emu. amp I:Z I — jJ A`l 0 P ''' • P U:SLIC WORKS' DE'F' T. s il dab wrmmG T TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD f (1:8] s'61.'d i im5 w SUBMITTAL fr•'°' ( &eked I ILO 6/05 ' III SITE PREPARATION PLAN I prol er R RD 6/05 S IN f .1. As gam PITO arr S STA 199.00 TO STA 204.00 W iale woos ,2 553 zw ti.e. ir • U.. a.- cor/F LI- tc WS .s. \ • ; / ..e7.... sio - 01 ,----0T- . /Ls /1-1.Vmmr... w;:, n i LI ..,,,j,....4:,...„//----_: :: ....". --c ___/ ,... , ,., ii..4". ....: '53 : ...7.'".....% milp., am. ....... ... ....4 .3., ,...1 .6'...D4 41... . .... ! 0 I t NS 50. 6' FtsC i tli t1.6c :::■475,57,.2. 'It': __ ,... , . i as. Gm Nolm sm. nt; ma use' \ 66.6 A-. , r Sri Ma 7 p OS dmior..... fro.-mmov. . ,. ,.. . - .- -,, ....L.-__•98,--TT---, . -7' f, e. . , . . . - ,.'"›.--'-a --'-----17 **6...■eistr■blowetwo .01#iine ■ ••■■■Coo . imnie-■-' ' .......momxraNSI...-1.6..,_rmes...111. ilitly-citicri.0.--.-------MM-1.-----;--4---":111■-te.: . -4,--1*,1111.01. N 4. /I. • r—F- I -7 '' ).'s- 1.... --..... t.,-..1-%.-• .,' ..:--..01-A"C MIS. (TYP). . _.„..,I''',' :.•,..,."----..-----:-.-L--,-- ' xF ?`, '... 8 I \ I \ 0 -I- C3 1 ■C'8 \ .., e i C.4 v-, n - - - - - - - - - PA, e.,,,,,.._, • i CIE -- - ------- J 1_2 f.Z CAR AY EL meta AP Ltir • 'Meal.. SW WM 016 ••• ..MDI WM Map all OM en eibillelP GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PRPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENtENCE PI LOCATING. FIXOTECONG. AND AVOIDING CCNFUCTS 111111 COMIC UTTUTTES IT IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE DIFORMATICN AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE CR COMPLETE 1 OVERHEAD P04631 LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY 970104. MOSE BIRDIE CAUTICIN WHEN DENNING 64 PRONIRTY TO AERIAL ROM UNE& 1 ABANDONED STERN DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY RUED NTH COF. A. APPROXIMATE CLEARING UNITS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. 4015101. CLEARING LORIS SHALL BE STAI(0) BY 11f CONDUCTOR AND APPROVED 85 1510 EN081 EER- SITE PREPARATION NOTES 0 808000 058300(0 cues. 0 REuCK anitORAL ROME CATCH BASK 131 MOW s16084 cam PIPE_ EXt ST1 Mew Cut/Fill Slope Gravel Surface oi!'"•••■_ .„ 5 10 20 10 60 retta...Near ca-r7 (u- SuoPE c■to ammo ■ tinflue ON. 'MEN 4111•••■ One CLE/ke1013 1-t AA ITS RIGWr - Or - \NI/101 CAT SLOPE . Z= 113 LI C V 0 F?FC S 1E= T - * • NGINEERING.STREETS•WATER*SEWERBUILDING. 4 1t, TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD MEMMEI 2 2 60% REviEw SUBMITTAL 1698 e„ 604 M " '., .... o w .......... SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 204+00 TO STA 209+00 ile A 02351 617 2 du MN Itik AS . 0031 field bk no ii. file date 6/2005 1 CLIT SLOPE [8 44+4 Or) u. cup E 433'+A or yp sAw NH {,cn 0 a -- -��_ APPROXIMATE / k SC 4 S. S F;- i+.T \ �.,� CLEARING UNITS (TYP) x` sr�:o• [ ie' M s - CI • -'... ., `� 'V O - • - -Y\ , K „ `\ 7 +1 Os , \ 210 `� f 2 / 1 CONSTR. f j P /' 212 �/� W 213/ .� f `7 / / / + SAVOR LBIE (7YP) i .°�E H H H 8 r // J W . It / _ L -g _ _- 7 r -- �1________ ., , . ti- , , „..„- ,.,, ,,.„,., . ......-,_-72 , - ,___ ...., _ , $,_ ,1 rape / 1� �'i � �/ •s.,• 211 N54570,44b GAT/ FILL S LLP E GENERAL NOTES SITE PREPARATION NOTES 1. NIS FUN HAS BEEN PREPARED FCR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONWN NCE N LOCATING. PROTECTING. AND AVOIDING CONFLICTS 711N COSTING DRUPES. CIS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND 6 NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR COMPLETE 2 OVERHEAD POTTER LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHDYN. EW.ROSE EOM( CAUTION MIN 0CIONRG N PRND6TY TO AERIAL POSER U IES 1 ABANDONED SINN ORAN PIPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY RUED NTH CDF. t. APPROXIMATE CLEARING LOUTS ARE SHOWN ON TEE PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING UNITS SHALL BE STAKED BY THE CNIIRACIOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENCLNaR 0 5 10 20 AO 60 SCALE IN EEET 0 REMOVE ROLLED CONCRETE NLRB. EX1ST1 N6 Cut /Fill Slope • CLEAZING LIMITS — ow. — ow RIUI -rr — OF — W A-4 i 1,4.41"4.-, P UBLIC WORKS DEPT_ yo a ti • ENGINEERING• STREETS• WATER* SEWER• BUILDING* • �' MPG .uN.�.. TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD soyoREVIEW SUBMITTAL 681 checked ILO vas SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 209.00 TO STA 214.00 M= aA>< H33m3W '° poi �E No 5,05 °°'° w' �it� a4 dale ceNce cu-r S t.DPE 6 '6i N S co co GENERAL NOTES T. THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CENSERFNCE 01 LOCADNG. PROTECTING. AND *5010030 CONFUCIS '0315 EXISTING U1U1ES IT 6 BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE MINATION AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCIIRAIE dt C091PIETE 2. OVERHEAD MCI LINES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHORT/. EXERCISE IXIREIE CAUTION T0E11 DORKING IN PROALOtt TO AERIAL PODS INES 1 ABANDONED STORY DRAIN PEE SHALL BE ENTIRELY RILED 031H COF. 4. AMMO/ATE CLEARING MATS ARE 510003 G.1 THE PLAN. ACTUAL CLEARING LOAM SHALL BE STAKED BY DIE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER i SITE PREPARATION NOTES © RAM CA101 BASK 1G. REYOEE STOW ORAN PIPE. G.4 Raw* 4WD CONCRETE CURB. EX►511N& % 040i Cut /Fill Slope •• — ATP® LLEA ING L-1M T5 .� .� .. Rurwr - or - w AV Q 3 u F u 0 o- F V PUBLIC' WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER• SEWER *BUILDING • 126•.... Awa. l.. 0.11 e.m....• .....a 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 214.00 TO STA 219 +00 24 E 268 9e Y @ss mree ale NA dale 612101 J APPROXIMATE (LEM1NG LAMS 1 111 • CAA-CIF! LL SLOPE UNCUT UNE (TYP)f� I I-I cii) Ntii.11, CuT S toPE • iSez i "` SC+ ;u: _ -f — `—:V, k •m — i ___ —-- — � Vr --7,;--(--7,;--(5-- iE "CC _ / }I \ 3 i3 - - - -- - - - -- 4:a711 _____ •�f� -�— ___________ 9 " -i - ` _ - - ___ / ________ ___ __ - - 7 GENERAL NOTES 1. TARS RUN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE N LOCKING, PROM-CONC. AND AMONG CONEUCIS '7TH CT°S ING MUTES. R IS BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND IS NOT NECESSARILY ACCURATE OR CONPEE'EE 2. OVERHEAD POWER UNES ARE NOT NECESSARILY 9101N. ExERCSE EXTREME CAUTION SHEN NORMNG N PROXIMITY TO AERIAL POMER LINES a ABAWONED STOMA DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE ENTIRELY RUED MN C6. 4. APPRCCOMATE CLEARING UNITS ARE WW1 ON IRE PLAN. ACTUAL cumin LAIR SNAIL BE STAKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINES. • o 510 20 40 so SCALE IN FEET SITE PREPARATION NOTES 10 ROAM 681800ED M EL Tl MOVE UT01 BASH. EXIST t Niaj Cut /Fill Slope CS .... �--� — — Cake( 1.) Llto115 MEM NIA - r RIVNT' - of - W Pcy 4 p rY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT_ • ENGINEERING •STREETS•WATER•SEWER•BUILDING• by date KpG ....°..e.. ewe •,e °°°" TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD me �— I= ° 60% REVIEW SUBMITTAL a„ , 68 ehabed Wei eel ID Mms 14 ,a6 SITE PREPARATION PLAN STA 219 +00 TO STA 224 +00 PD PI w° ao dote NYM197W dale word • APPENDIX D Photographs DSCN1524.JPG 2006/01/31 10:48:16 DSCN1525.JPG 2006/01/31 10:48:36 DSCN1526.JPG 2006/01/31 10:50:16 DSCN1527.JPG 2006/01/31 10:53:12 DSCN1529.JPG 2006/01/31 10:55:28 DSCN1534.JPG 2006/01/31 11:04:45