HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E07-007 - NIEDER DANIEL - 9 LOT BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT9 DEVELOPED LOTS
FOR SINGLE - FAMILY
RESIDENCES - BLA
12522 51ST PL S.
E07 -007
•
City of Tukwila
Steven M Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
November 30, 2007
Daniel Nieder
103 Newell Street, Suite B
Seattle, WA 98109
Re: 9 Lot BLA —12522 51st Place S, Tukwila, WA
Dear Mr. Nieder,
The City of Tukwila received your letter dated November 27, 2007 requesting that the
Department of Community Development (DCD) place a 90 -day hold on issuing decisions
for permits including a 9 lot boundary line adjustment (L07 -026) and SEPA
environmental review (E07 -007).
It is my understanding that a 90 -day hold is requested as the result of negotiations with
the current property owner and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) to sell the property
that is the subject of the above listed land use applications. You have expressed that
placing a hold on issuance of a decision for pending land use applications would allow
you the time you need to determine whether you would like to either continue to pursue
the 9 -lot boundary line adjustment and associated environmental review, or to formally
withdraw these applications.
Washington state law requires that a decision-on a land use application by issued within
the-time period established by local ordinance. The time period established by the City of
Tukwila is 120 days from the date the applicant is notified that the application is
complete. By making a request to place a 90 -day hold on the above mentioned
applications, thus preventing the City of Tukwila from meeting the 120 day time
requirement, you agree to release the City of Tukwila from liability for any damages
related to your request. With this understanding, I will put a 90 -day hold on pending
applications L07 -026 and E07 -007 as of the date of your letter of request (November 27,
2007).
Sincerely,
Org. 1'14
Jaimie Reavis
Assistant Planner
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
•
November 27, 2007
12522 51st Pl. S., LLC
103 Newell Street, Suite B
Seattle, WA 98109
(206) 604 -6322
Jaimie Reavis
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: 9 LOT BLA — 12522 51st PI. S. Tukwila, WA
Dear Jaimie,
RECEiven
NOV 2.9 200r
DOMMuh„ ,
�ELOP�NT
As we discussed via telephone earlier today, we would like to Request a 90 Day
Hold on our 9 lot boundary line adjustment (BLA) request.
As you know, we are currently in negotiations with, Burlington Northern Santa Fe
(BNSF) to sell them the subject property. At' this* :.point in 'time, should BNSF
purchase our property, they would prefer that `the ;.BLA application be left in it's
current position — on the doorstep of being approved but not yet approved.
I am confidant that in 90 days from the date of this letter we will have either
completed the sale to BNSF or the deal will be dead and we will choose to
complete the BLA.
Thank you for your understanding. Please feel free to contact me should you
have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Daniel. Nieder
Mem'be'r'.
12522 ,51st PI..S., LLC
City of T'ukw la
Department of Community Development
November 14, 2007
Mr. Daniel Nieder
103 Newell Street, Suite B
Seattle, WA 98109
Subject: Permit applications for 12522 51st Place S: L07 -026, E07 -007
Dear Mr. Nieder,
Steven M Mullet, Mayor
Steve Lancaster, Director
Due to recent meetings held related to your property located at 12522 51S` Place S, the
City of Tukwila is requesting clarification as to whether you would like the Department
of Community Development to move forward and issue decisions including SEPA and a
request for a Boundary Line Adjustment.
On September 27, 2007, City of Tukwila staff met with you and Jason Legat to discuss
the possibility of a rezone of the property from Low Density Residential (LDR) to
Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). On October 30, 2007, City staff met
with representatives from BNSF to discuss the potential rezone of the property as well.
It was staff's opinion during both meetings that a rezone for the property in question is
unlikely, given the site's location within an LDR zone and the significant change in use
that would be permitted with a rezone of the property to MIC/H.
Please provide a written response by November 28, 2007, stating whether you would like
the Department of Community Development to either proceed with issuing a decision on
applications pending for 12522 51S` Place South, or whether you would like to withdraw
your applications. If no response is received by November 28, 2007, we will proceed
with processing your applications. If you decide to withdraw your applications please
submit a written letter by November 28, 2007. Please call me at (206) 431 -3659 if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
aimie Reavis
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
Name of proposed project, if applicable:
12522 51" Pl. S., LLC 9 -lot BLA
Name of Applicant:
Leganieds, LLC
Date checklist prepared:
04/13/07
Agency Comments
OG,4
\H
4. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
We plan on submitting this SEPA & BLA on or around 04/18/07. Within the
following 3 months, we plan on bringing the remaining needed utilities to
each building lot. We will begin immediately, following authorization to
proceed. No specific schedule currently exists for any future
construction.
6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
The overall plan is to have 9 fully developed building lots within the
following 3 months. In the future, the parcels created through the BLA,
will be the site of single - family residences.
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
PHASE 1 environmental assessment
Asbestos survey on existing house and structures.
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
From City of Tukwila - 1) BLA, 2) ROW Permit- in order to install remaining
utilities, 3) Demo Permit, in order to demo existing house and structures.
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page.
Our proposal includes the use of a BLA, to create 9 building -ready SFR lots, per
city code. Our proposal also includes the demo and removal of all existing
structures and the installation of electricity, phone, and cable TV to each '
building lot.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot
number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any
plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
All of the above will be included in the BLA application package.
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one
mountainous, other:
rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Approximately 10 %.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
Silty clay loam
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
There are no indications of unstable soils.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
The grading that will occur for the BLA is trench excavation and backfill for
the utility service stubbouts and minor gravel fill for lot access. The total
excavation and fill quantity is estimated at approximatlely 100 cubic yards.
Future filling and grading required for the 9 single family residences will
include minor grading for building locations (approximately 10 cubic yards
per house), excavation for building foundations, and a minimal amount of fill
brought in for driveways. The fill will likely be crushed rock from a certified
pit and it is estimated that approximately 10 to 20 cubic yards of crushed
rock will be used for each house.
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
g.
Trench excavation and grading for future single family residences could
result in minor erosion that will be controlled by the use of appropriate
BMP's.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Less than 10% of the site will be impervious after the BLA and utility
stubbouts and it is estimated after completion of the 9 single family
residences that less than 50% of each lot will be impervious. The
impervious surfaces for each lot will include roofs, driveways, walkways,
and patios.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
BMP's of future clearing and grading activities may include stabilization of
disturbed soils and installation construction entrances, silt fencing, and
any other means required by weather conditions.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is
completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Emissions may include those associated with typical land grading activity.
NOTE: the small amount of asbestos contained in the existing house will
be handled and disposed of per regulations.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
No measures are proposed.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
Said property is located N and E of the Duwamish River.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No, the property is not located within the FEMA designated flood zone.
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve:
No waste material will be discharged in conjunction with the proposed
project. Ultimately, all future new houses will be connected to a new
sewer system recently installed by the City.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this
water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Stormwater runoff from future single family residences will be routed to
dispersion trenches or perforated tightlines. Any water that does not
infiltrate will flow into a swale along 51" PI S and flow northerly in the
swale to the existing storm drain system at 5.124th St.
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Temporary erosion control meausures will be implemented during
construction of utilities /trenches and future single family residences. The
measures may include silt fencing, construction entrances, mulching,
stockpile covering.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The proposed project will include removal of existing ground cover and
underbrush.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Landscaping for 9 future single family residences will include a wide
varied of landscape materials Including native plants. The future
landscaping will enhance the current site by increasing the amount of
vegetation in the interior portions of the lots.
Deciduous tree: alder, maple, asperkathe)
Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
s
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,
skunk cabbage, other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation: BLACKBERRIES
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The proposed project will include removal of existing ground cover and
underbrush.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
Landscaping for 9 future single family residences will include a wide
varied of landscape materials Including native plants. The future
landscaping will enhance the current site by increasing the amount of
vegetation in the interior portions of the lots.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
5. Animals
a.
Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle songbirds other:
Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
Other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, this area is part of the Pacific Flyway. A primary corridor for
migratory bird species.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None proposed.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
Agency Comments
The future 9 single family residences will require electricity for lighting and
appliances. Heat for the future residences may be provided by a range of
energy sources including electricty, natural gas, oil, wood stoves, and /or
solar.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If ?
so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None proposed at this time.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of
this proposal? If so, describe.
Prior to demo of existing home, 150 square ft. of asbestos will be removed
and disposed of per regulations. The environmental health hazards
associated with single family residences should be minimal as current
building codes prevent or minimize health hazards.
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Emergency services may be required for the future single family
residences including fire department and medic services. There is good
access to the future houses /lots for emergency services.
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Future single family residences will be constructed per the current codes which include
provisions to minimize health hazards.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There are several emitters of noise in vicinity, but none that will affect this project.
EMITTERS: traffic (1 -5), airplanes, and BNSF site - tractor - trailers.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short term noise levels will likely increase due to typical construction activity.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None proposed.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently home to an unoccupied single-family residence. The
surrounding properties are mostly SFR's, except for the BNSF intermodal
site directly to the N of the property.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Describe any structures on the site.
There is an unoccupied SFR, a small guesthouse, and a garage.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes, the existing SFR, small guesthouse, and garage will be demolished.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
LDR
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
LDR
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
NO
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
It is anticipated that an average of two to four people will reside in each
of the 9 SFRs.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
All phases of the project will be reviewed by City of Tukwila to ensure
compliance with City Codes and Regulations.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing?
There will 9 single family residences constructed in the future and it is
anticipated the units will be middle- income housing.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing.
One middle- income house will be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None proposed
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what
is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The height of the future 9 SFRs will be limited to 30 feet, the maximum
allowed in the LDR zone..
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The project will not impact any current views.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
No measures are currently proposed. Any potential future construction
will be in accordance with City of Tukwila Building Codes and
Regulations.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
The activities involved in the BLA will not increase the amount of light
generated from the site.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No off-site sources will impact this proposal.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Any future construction will be in accordance with City of Tukwila
building Codes and. Regulations.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Recreational opportunities in the vicinity include the Tukwila Community
Center and the Green /Duwamish River Trail.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None proposed
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None Known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific,
or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
No evidence is present.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None proposed.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Regional acces to the site is provided by 1 -5, SR 599, SR 99, and
Interurban Ave S. The local access is primarily 42nd Ave S, S 120 th St, and
51s PI S. The 9 futre SFRs will be accessed via new driveways from 51st
Place S.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
The site is not currently served. The nearest marked transit stop is
located near the intersection of Martin L King Jr Way & S 129th St at
approximately 0.9 miles away.
Agency Comments
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate? •
The future 9 SFRs will include garages and driveways with 3 or more parking spaces per
lot. The project eliminates approximately 3 parking stalls with demolition of the garage.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
It is estimate that there will be an average of 4 vehicular trips to each future 9
SFR with the peak volume occurring in the late afternoon.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None proposed.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
There will be an increase need in public services for the 9 future SFRs including
fire protection, police protection, health care, and schools.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
The future 9 SFRs will be sited within 150 feet of hydrants per fire
code /department requirements. Driveways will allow good access to the SFRs.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
Celectricitural ga ., water, refuse servic
system, other.
ephone, itary sewe septic
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
The future 9 SFRs will be served by electricity from Seattle City
Light, telephone from Qwest, cable television from Comcast,
sanitary sewer from City of Tukwila, and water from City of
Tukwila.
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted: 1 °' I P-1 1 0�
(NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND
ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PAGES).
Dept. Of Community Development
City of Tukwila
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
I.
b(- HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
Notice of Public Hearing
Determination of Non•Significance
Notice of Public Meeting
Project Name: \ '2,,c
Mitigated Determination of Non -
Significance
1A:) 7 --
Project Number: f> 0 l "-00 `1
Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt
Mailer's Signature:
Determination of Significance & Scoping
Notice
Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt
fit, �1ic..cQ
Notice of Action
Planning Commission Agenda Pkt
Official Notice
Short Subdivision Agenda
Notice of Application
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt
Permit
_
_
FAX To Seattle Times
Classifieds
Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds
PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111
Other
•
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this P day of
year 2001
in the
P :\ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS\FORMSW FFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION
Project Name: \ '2,,c
51--? 1. S . ',Lc.
1A:) 7 --
Project Number: f> 0 l "-00 `1
11
Mailer's Signature:
'
44LOC
Person requesting mailing:
fit, �1ic..cQ
tJ�cij
P :\ADMINISTRATIVEFORMS\FORMSW FFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION
• •
ANDERSON,DONNA M BERNABEL,SIMON BNSF RWY PROP TAX DEPT
1253351ST PL S 5021 S 124TH ST PO BOX 96189
SEATTLE, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178 FORT WORTH, TX 76161
BNSF RWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT CODIGA,JAMES DACANAY LETICIA R
1700 E GOLF RD 400 12529 50TH PL S 12529 51ST PL S
SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 SEATTLE, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178
DACANAY,LETICIA R
6911 36TH AVE SW
SEATTLE, WA 98126
DOAK HOMES INC
11812 26TH AVE SW
SEATTLE, WA 98146
DUNN VERNE D
12556 50TH PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178
DUNN,VERNE D ERICKSON,JOHN FULTZ PATRICK +LAUREL
817 13TH AVE . 12560 51ST PL S 12522 50TH PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98122 SEATTLE, WA 98178 SEATTLE, WA 98178
GLIDDEN,DONALD L & TERESA L
TRUST
17659 SE 192ND DR
RENTON, WA 98058
HELDE SHIRLEY +HELDE KAREN
PO BOX 91
CLINTON, WA 98236
JACKSON,EMMETT L
5023 S 124TH ST
TUKWILA, WA 98178
MEYERS PATTI
1854 BROADMOOR DR E
SEATTLE, WA 98112
NGET VET & CHANTHY VORN
1225351ST PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178
HARDIN,CHRISTOPHER R
12507 50TH PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98178
HULMAN,HUGH HOGAN
35646 14TH AVE SW
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98023
LADINES,MARGARITA S
4925 S 125TH ST
SEATTLE, WA 98178
MULRYAN JAMES
12546 50TH PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98178
NGUYEN SINH V +LAN HUONG HUY
3665 RENTON AVE S
SEATTLE, WA 98144
HELDE SHIRLEY +HELDE KAREN
12562 50TH PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178
HUTCHINSON JOHN L
830 HEARTHSTONE DR
TUKWILA, WA 83702
LANCE,RANDAL D
12257 51ST PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98178
NEWMAN,ROBERT ETAL
341 SMITHERS AVE S
TUKWILA, WA
NORTHERN PACIFIC RR CO
777 MAIN ST
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
OWNER REEVE BURR C RIVAS,WILLIAM
103 NEWELL ST #B 7210 SE 24TH ST 12527 51ST PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98109 MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 SEATTLE, WA 98178
Impression antibourrage et a sachage rapide•
Utilisez le gabarit 5160®
RUGGLES,AUTUMN J & RICHARD L
12404 50TH PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98178
SERAFICA FELIPE M +MARCELINA C
12542 50TH PL S
SEATTLE, WA 98178
www.avery.com
1- 800-GO -AVERY
RYAN MARY PATRICIA
PO BOX 337
RENTON, WA 98057
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
ATTN BILLINGS JIM
1416 DODGE ST #325
OMAHA, NE 68179
AVERY® 5160®
•
RYAN,MARY PATRICIA
PO BOX 336
RENTON, WA 98057
WENDT,KAREN A
12537 51ST PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178
TENANT TENANT TENANT
12200 51ST PL S 12248 50TH AVE S 12400 51ST PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178
TENANT TENANT TENANT
12410 50TH PL S 12420 51ST PL S 12430 51ST PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178
TENANT TENANT TENANT
12450 51ST PL S 12460 51ST PL S 12500 51ST PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178 • . TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178
TENANT TENANT , , TENANT
12501 50TH PL S 12522 51ST PL S 12523 50TH PL S
TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178 TUKWILA, WA 98178
TENANT : TENANT
12550 51ST PL S 1 5005 S 124TH ST
TUKWILA, WA 98178 !I TUKWILA, WA 98178
Aa3A1,V-09- 008 -I.
•
tie
®0915 31V1dVI31®tieAV as
A......... ss.. sA••wr ■..e MO,
Page 1 of 1
soon
CityGIS
Copyright O 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of the
contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products.
http : / /maps.digitalmapcentral.com /production /CityGIS /v07 01 034 /indexA.html 08/06/2007
Susan Brock - Fwd: mailing labels - 1252 st PI S
1
From: Jaimie Reavis
To: Susan Brock
Date: 08/02/2007 4:49 pm
Subject: Fwd: mailing labels - 12522 51st PI S
»> Jaimie Reavis 07/26/2007 9:33 am »>
Hi Susan,
I will need some mailing labels for another project. The parcels include the following numbers:
0179002110
0179002155
0179002160
Let me know if you need any other information....thanks!
Jaimie
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
ANDERSON,DONNA M
12533 51ST PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
BERNABEL,SIMON
5021 S 124TH ST
TUKWILA
WA
98178
BNSF RWY PROP TAX DEPT
PO BOX 96189
FORT WORTH
TX
76161
BNSF RWY PROPERTY TAX DEPT
1700 E GOLF RD 400
SCHAUMBURG
IL
60173
CODIGA,JAMES
12529 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
DACANAY LETICIA R
12529 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
DACANAY,LETICIA R
6911 36TH AVE SW
SEATTLE
WA
98126
DOAK HOMES INC
11812 26TH AVE SW
SEATTLE
WA
98146
DUNN VERNE D
12556 50TH PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
DUNN,VERNE D
817 13TH AVE
SEATTLE
WA
98122
ERICKSON,JOHN
12560 51ST PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
FULTZ PATRICK +LAUREL
12522 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
GLIDDEN,DONALD L & TERESA L TRUST
17659 SE 192ND DR
RENTON
WA
98058
HARDIN,CHRISTOPHER R
12507 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
HELDE SHIRLEY +HELDE KAREN
12562 50TH PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
HELDE SHIRLEY +HELDE KAREN
PO BOX 91
CLINTON
WA
98236
HULMAN,HUGH HOGAN
35646 14TH AVE SW
FEDERAL WAY
WA
98023
HUTCHINSON JOHN L
830 HEARTHSTONE DR
TUKWILA
WA
83702
JACKSON,EMMETT L
5023 S 124TH ST
TUKWILA
WA
98178
LADINES,MARGARITA S
4925 S 125TH ST
SEATTLE
WA
98178
LANCE,RANDAL D
12257 51ST PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
MEYERS PATTI
1854 BROADMOOR DR E
SEATTLE
WA
98112
MULRYAN JAMES
12546 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
NEWMAN,ROBERT ETAL
341 SMITHERS AVE S
TUKWILA
WA
NGET VET & CHANTHY VORN
12253 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
NGUYEN SINH V +LAN HUONG HUY
3665 RENTON AVE S
SEATTLE
WA
98144
NORTHERN PACIFIC RR CO
777 MAIN ST
FORT WORTH
TX
76102
OWNER
103 NEWELL ST #B
SEATTLE
WA
98109
REEVE BURR C
7210 SE 24TH ST
MERCER ISLAND
WA
98040
RIVAS,WILLIAM
12527 51ST PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
RUGGLES,AUTUMN J & RICHARD L
12404 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
RYAN MARY PATRICIA
PO BOX 337
RENTON
WA
98057
RYAN,MARY PATRICIA
PO BOX 336
RENTON
WA
98057
SERAFICA FELIPE M +MARCELINA C
12542 50TH PL S
SEATTLE
WA
98178
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
ATTN BILLINGS JIM
1416 DODGE ST #325
OMAHA
NE
68179
WENDT,KAREN A
12537 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12200 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12248 50TH AVE S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12400 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12410 50TH PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12420 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12430 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12450 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12460 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12500 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12501 50TH PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12522 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12523 50TH PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
12550 51ST PL S
TUKWILA
WA
98178
TENANT
5005 S 124TH ST
TUKWILA
WA
98178
July 24, 2007
city of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION
Mr. Daniel Nieder
103 Newell Street, Suite B
Seattle, WA 98109
Subject: 12522 51st Pl. S LLC 9 -Lot BLA
L07 -026
E07 -007
Dear Mr. Nieder:
Your application for a nine lot boundary line adjustment is considered complete on July 24, 2007
for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements.
This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that
you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to
ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process.
This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your
responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies.
Please contact Fast Signs in order to have the public notice board for this project manufactured and
installed on site within the next 14 days. The City of Tukwila will coordinate the public notice
mailing with installation of the public notice board. Once the public notice board is installed, the
public comment period for this project will be 14 days.
I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to
call me at (206) 431 - 3659.
Sincerely,
90,1'444 got,t0;--
Jaimie Reavis
Assistant Planner
cc. L07 -026
E07 -007
JR Page 1 of 1
H:\BLAs \Leganieds \12522 51st P1 S LLC 9 -lot BLAcomplete.DOC
07/23/2007 12:50 PM
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PROJECT INFORMATION
Daniel Nieder, 12522 51St PI S LLC has filed applications for development of a 9 -lot
Boundary Line Adjustment to be located on the northeast side of 51st Place S, at 12522 51St
PI S.
Permits applied for include: E07 -007 - SEPA /Environmental Review; L07 -026 -
Departmental Review
Other known required permits include: right -of -way permit, demolition permit
Studies required with the applications include: N/A
An environmental checklist has been submitted with the studies identified above.
FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request
them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100.
Project Files include: E07 -007, L07 -026, and D07 -157
OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at
the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., August 22, 2007.
Opportunity for additional oral and written public comments will be provided at a
public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, tentatively scheduled for
September 26, 2007. To confirm this date call the Department of Community
Development at (206) 431 -3670.
APPEALS
You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights
by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. Appeals to the decision made on this project may be
made to the Hearing Examiner.
For further information on this proposal, contact Jaimie Reavis at (206) 431 -3659 or visit
our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m.
Application Filed: April 20, 2007
Notice of Completeness Issued: July 24, 2007
Notice of Application Issued: August 8, 2007
S 9.55 IE !"
E 9.50 1E %-.
ON W SI �j'
1213.11 IE ". Ye
SIDE
,VC SSW 13.24,4'
DI culve
13.7
Vicinity Map
`N
30 fat`
4414
S 124th St
iONT
ETBACX
10.51 IE
10.54 IE
41E SIDE
� pp u21 3
EXISTING BUILDING
(TO BE REMOVED)
EXISTING BUILDING
(TO BE REMOVED)
peQnA OT
6.929 sq. ft. j
/ 0.1Z14 ocres / O
EXISTING
BLDG .7
(TO BE REMOVED) /6
d\Flne . % 40, \\0.'
\
LOT
824 ...11,
PARCEL 0.19 a *\
a \ B iAb 1
�\
EXISTING
LOT UNE
PROPOSED
LOT UNE
10'
UTILITY ESN
SSMI1
RIM 18.71
6" PVC N 11.93 IE
6" PVC S 12.28 IE
4" PVC W12.221E
LADDER ON E SIDE
PROPOSED BLA PLAN:
,1
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST
The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the
Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you
feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin
until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED.
The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City
may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards.
City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department fttop ��
Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). t
Check hems .Information
submitted
with ,
application
Required. Hr 2 u anti
COMMU
ut/ELOpNjN
May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works and Planning �ENr
APPLICATION MATERIALS:
■
1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application.
2. Completed ESA Screening Checklist, SEPA Environmental Checklist and drawings (5 copies).
../
3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 ".
V"
4. Application Fee $590.
✓
5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA review.
PUBLIC NOTICE MATERIALS:
6. Payment of a $365 notice board fee to FastSigns Tukwila or
Provide a 4' x 4' public notice board on site within 14 days of the Department determining that
a complete application has been received (see Public Notice Sign Specifications Handout).
7. Payment of a $100 mailing label fee to the City of Tukwila or
Provide two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or
businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings- -
e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks - -must be included (see Public Notice Mailing Label Handout).
8. If providing own labels King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each
property within 500 ft. of the subject lot.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS:
/
9. Vicinity Map with site location.
10. Provide four (4) copies of any sensitive area studies such as wetland or geotechnical reports
if needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45). See the Geotechnical Report
Guidelines and Sensitive Area Special Study Guidelines (online at
www. ci .tukwila.wa.us /dcd /dcdplan.htm) for additional information.
11. Any drawings needed to describe the proposal other than those submitted with the
underlying permit. Maximum size 24" x 36 ".
C: \Documents and Settings \Daniel Nieder \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \ OLKB \ SEPAApp_51st PL BLA.doc
April 17, 2007
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
STATE. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
12522 51`t PI. S., LLC 9 -lot BLA
2. Name of Applicant:
12522 51't P. S., LLC
3. Date checklist prepared:
04/13/07
Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila
5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
We plan on submitting this SEPA & BLA on or around 04/18/07. Within the
following 3 months, we plan on bringing the remaining needed utilities to
each building lot. We will begin immediately, following authorization to
proceed. No specific schedule currently exists for any future
construction.
6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
The overall plan is to have 9 fully developed building lots within the
following 3 months. In the future, the parcels created through the BLA,
will be the site of single- family residences.
7. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
PHASE 1 environmental assessment
Asbestos survey on existing house and structures.
8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
From City of Tukwila - 1) BLA, 2) ROW Permit- in order to install remaining
utilities, 3) Demo Permit, in order to demo existing house and structures.
10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page.
Our proposal includes the use of a BLA, to create 9 building -ready SFR lots, per
city code. Our proposal also includes the demo and removal of all existing
structures and the installation of electricity, phone, and cable TV to each
building lot.
11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot
number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any
plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
All of the above will be included in the BLA application package.
12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one
mountainous, other:
rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Approximately 10 %.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prime farmland.
Silty clay loam
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
There are no indications of unstable soils.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill.
The only grading that will occur is trench excavation and backfill for the
utility service stubbouts and minor gravel fill for lot access. The total
excavation and fill quantity is estimated at approximatlely 100 cubic yards.
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f.
g.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so, generally describe.
Trench excavation could result in minor erosion that will be controlled by
the use of appropriate BMP's.
About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Less than 10% of the site will be impervious after the BLA and utility
stubbouts.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
BMP's of future clearing and grading activities may include stabilization of
disturbed soils and installation construction entrance, silt fencing, and
any other means required by weather conditions.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust,
automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is
completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Emissions may include those associated with typical land grading activity.
NOTE: the small amount of asbestos contained in the existing house will
be handled and disposed of per regulations.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
No measures are proposed.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or
river it flows into.
Said property is located N and E of the Duwamish River.
2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No, the property is not located within the FEMA designated flood zone.
6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give
general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known.
No
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve:
No waste material will be discharged in conjunction with the proposed
project. Ultimately, all future new houses will be connected to a new
sewer system recently installed by the City.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this
water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
The existing storm water runoff patterns, primarily sheet flow, will be
maintained.
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Temporary erosion control meausures will be implemented during
construction of utilities /trenches.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The proposed project will include removal of existing ground cover and
underbrush.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
N/A
Agency Comments
Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspertherJ
Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
s
Grass
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush,
skunk cabbage, other
Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
Other types of vegetation: BLACKBERRIES
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The proposed project will include removal of existing ground cover and
underbrush.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
N/A
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site:
Birds:
Mammals
Fish
Other
Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
NO TO ALL
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None are known to be present.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None proposed.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc.
No energy is required for proposed project. Future construction will likely
satisfy energy needs through the use of electricity.
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If
so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None proposed at this time.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of
this proposal? If so, describe.
Prior to demo of existing home, 150 square ft. of asbestos will be removed
and disposed of per regulations.
1. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special service required.
2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None proposed.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Noise
1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
There are several emitters of noise in vicinity, but none that will affect this project.
EMITTERS: traffic (1 -5), airplanes, and BNSF site - tractor - trailers.
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Short term noise levels will likely increase due to typical construction activity.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None proposed.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is currently home to an unoccupied single - family residence. The
surrounding . properties are mostly. SFR's, except for the BNSF intermodal
site directly to the N of the property.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
c. Describe any structures on the site.
An unoccupied SFR, a small guesthouse, and a garage.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes, both the existing SFR and detached garage, cLNCl sOnai 43 C56
e.. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
LDR
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
LDR
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so,
specify.
NO
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any:
All phases of the project will be reviewed by City of Tukwila to ensure
compliance with City Codes and Regulations.
Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing?
No housing is proposed with the BLA.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low- income housing.
One middle- income house will be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None proposed
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what
is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
At this time no specific construction plans are in place. Building heights
will be within the standards established by the City of Tukwila Code.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The project will not impact any current views.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
No measures are currently proposed. Any potential future construction
will be in accordance with City of Tukwila Building Codes and
Regulations.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
The activities involved in the BLA will not increase the amount of light
generated from the site.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
No off -site sources will impact this proposal.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
Any future construction will be in accordance with City of Tukwila
building Codes and Regulations.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
There are no formal existing recreational activities within the immediate
vicinity.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None proposed
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local
preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None Known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific,
or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
No evidence is present.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None proposed.
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
14.. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is accessed via 51st Pl. S. Each newly created lot will
ingress /egress via 51st Place S.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance
to the nearest transit stop?
The site is not currently served. The nearest marked transit stop is
located near the intersection of Martin L King Jr Way & S 129th St at
approximately 0.9 miles away.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the
project eliminate?
No public parking spaces will be created or eliminated with this project.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing
roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether
public or private).
No.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
N/A
Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None proposed.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None proposed.
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural g
system, other.
lephone, sanitary sewe
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity from Seattle City Light, Telephone from Qwest, and
Cable TV from Comcast
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to m its decision.
Signature: �!
412010-1
(NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND
ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE
FOLLOWING PAGES).
Date Submitted:
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction with the list of elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or
the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the
item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not
implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions
to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or
production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine
life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life
are:
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental
protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or
endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or
prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
Agency Comments
Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary.
Applicant Responses: Agency Comments
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or
public service and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or
Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
•
RECEIVED
erne or T1 IviA191..A
erne
CITY OF TUKWILA ' APR 2 0 2001
Department of Community Development ENVIRONMENTAL
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Meant t. dM 4
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 REVIEW
E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us
SEPA
APPLICATION
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 12522 51sT PL. S., LLC 9 -LOT BLA
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
12522 51sT PLS., TUKWILA WA 98178
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement).
017900-2110,-2155 & -2160
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development
standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: Daniel Nieder
Address: 103 Newell St, Suite B, Seattle WA 98109
Phone: 206.604.6322
E -mail: danielnieder comcast.n
Signature:
206.838.5205
Date: 4/6/07
C: \Documents and Settings \Daniel Nieder \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \ OLKB \ SEPAApp_51st PL BLA.doc
April 17, 2007
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA
Planner: a-'
Ls
File Number:
E. 01 - 0 a �--
Application Complete
(Date: 7/2 /Zl1b-7)
Project File Number:
P 0 6 -oS
Application Incomplete
(Date:
)
Other File Numbers:
L. Oe% --0 210
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 12522 51sT PL. S., LLC 9 -LOT BLA
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
12522 51sT PLS., TUKWILA WA 98178
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement).
017900-2110,-2155 & -2160
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development
standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: Daniel Nieder
Address: 103 Newell St, Suite B, Seattle WA 98109
Phone: 206.604.6322
E -mail: danielnieder comcast.n
Signature:
206.838.5205
Date: 4/6/07
C: \Documents and Settings \Daniel Nieder \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \ OLKB \ SEPAApp_51st PL BLA.doc
April 17, 2007
City of Tukwila
Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist
Date: 04/06/07
RECEIVED.
APR 2 0 2001
comNiu i s Y
DEVELOPMENT
Applicant Name: 12522 51st Pl. S., LLC
Street Address: 103 Newell Street, Suite B
City, State, Zip: Seattle, WA 98109
Telephone: 206.604.6322
Directions
This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to
result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No"
questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read
each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed
by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading
and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your
project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated.
C: \Documents and Settings \Daniel Nieder \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \ OLKB \ SEPAApp_51st PL BLA.doc
April 17, 2007
Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project
including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and
ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes
answer.
1 -0
Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling,
clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing
ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0
YES . Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) X
2 -0
Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be
removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please
circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -0
ft_S) Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) X
3 -0
Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark
of a watercourse or the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water
mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining
where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil
from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15).
Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 4 -0 X
YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5)
4 -0
Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous
substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank.
Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance,
product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria
of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385).
This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle
appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 5 -0
YES Continue to Question 5 -0 X
5 -0
Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of
projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well,
change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction
dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the
purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements
of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes.
Please circle appropriate response.
O Continue to Question 6 -0 X
YES - Continue to Question 6 -0
C: \Documents and Settings \ Daniel Nieder \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \ OLKB \ SEPAApp_51st PL
BLA.doc Apri117, 2007
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part A (continued)
6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the
regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of
transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs,
groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect
appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this
includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response.
NO Checklist Complete X
YES — Checklist Complete
Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
1 -1
Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the
Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This
includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but
will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high
water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response.
(No) Continue to Question 1 -2 X
YES - Continue to Question 1 -2
1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off
site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish
rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in
increased erosion and /or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your
project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during
construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your
project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the
preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in
erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question.
Please circle appropriate response.
Continue to Question 1 -3 X
YES - Continue to Question 1 -3
1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces
include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the
manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a
hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased
rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas
include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or
other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to
development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response.
(N0)Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) X
YES - Continue to Question 1 -4
Part B (continued)
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be
infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a
stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by
allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the
ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include
the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater,
answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2)
YES- Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) X
Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer
2 -1
Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) X
YES - Continue to Question 2 -2
2 -2
Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark
of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC
18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a
potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet.
Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 2 -3 X
YES - Continue to Question 2 -3
2 -3
Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary
high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of
this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in
the fall. Please circle appropriate response.
(NOContinue to Question 2 -4 X
YES - Continue to Question 2 -4
2 -4
Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) X
YES - Continue to Question 2 -5
2 -5
Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response.
NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) X
YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2)
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high
water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each
question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to,
construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled
maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer.
3 -1
Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the
Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the
area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the
stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes
both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -2
YES - Continue to Question 3 -2
3 -2
Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the
Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means"
flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that
allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels,
remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area
that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This
includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses
or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a
flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -3
YES - Continue to Question 3 -3
3 -3
Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could
be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black
Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified
structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of
salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -4
YES - Continue to Question 3 -4
3 -4
Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the
cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right
bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -5
YES - Continue to Question 3 -5
3 -5
Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a
watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris
includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal,
and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal
City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist
from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity
should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -6
YES - Continue to Question 3 -6
3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to
another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat
conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside
seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection
to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under
natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater
support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please
circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -7
YES - Continue to Question 3 -7
3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a
watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of
artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature
created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife,
particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 3 -8
YES - Continue to Question 3 -8
3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization
includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete
structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response.
NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2)
YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2)