The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E07-016 - CITY OF TUKWILA - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REZONESABEY CORPORATION CHANGE AREA FROM MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTER -HEAVY (MIC -H) TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) BOEING ACCESS ROAD /AIRPORT WAY S. / E. MARGINAL WAY S. / S. NORFOLK ST. E07 -016 RECEIVED OCT 052001 City of Tukwila PuBUK wo Ks File Number E (° '7 0 f Department of Community Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning XPublic Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec i��. �Mrc -ffJ Project Name: C. gt t79 Guy "k u1�'r'l r� /Icy- nth'ILi .. -�r- 13/423:914 f-� 1--1 fl6)1--( "ilu.:` -c (LT) p,- t.Iney,sia -C PG. -v/1:rgi e,-+e. CA _fro cs i q,- w.). fit.) Address: . 330 S. Nor fr- r,e $ ( Z itYrd -r-pr.::.e "L-7Date Transmitted: (') f o Response Due by: IQ/ / I s r i Staff Coordinator: Instructions Date Response Received: The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and f) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working days! 1,4 OA - prvje`�r ►� I G'�f L GC ZI A-0 - . Z. fv W -kvi ytc -✓"(-. 6\.1 ctrl/ ' `'S,S:t C(l? 1,Q 1L / IA 14e (ii /ir (n rcI6h9r-to I t'.t'r. Feid)a,t- tct.t-�v nt- PLO h.to/) rz, ebiA4.1A/LeA,A Comments Prepared by: JOO 1'0— s 2� Date: /° / 23/0 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Shaunta R. Hyde, Manager Local Government Relations The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 October 19, 2007 Dear Ms. Hyde: Thank you for your letter commenting on the SEPA checklist /traffic study pertaining to a potential Comprehensive Plan change and rezone for the Associated Grocers site. I am enclosing a response from Cyndy Knighton including background materials as requested, as well as a copy of the Determination of Non - Significance that was issued for the request. The SEPA review and determination apply only to the non - project action. If the Tukwila City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone, additional environmental review will take place when a specific development proposal is submitted. The Boeing Company and other interested parties will have the opportunity to comment at that time. Please contact me at 206 - 431 -3683 or via email at rfox @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have additional questions. Sincerely, j. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Enc. Rf 1 10/19/2007 6300 Southc its %r OLifte>1ar,`"$'u 'Y11 u cwr a, as 'uigton 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF. DISTRIBUTION X11 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non- Significance "�1( Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature. VAAL: Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Person requesting mailing: Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of.Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision.Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds .Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this / 9 day of in the year 2001 P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMSUFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUT ION Project Name:(,t "�1( Project Number: �`-D'j - 1 LD Mailer's Signature. VAAL: Person requesting mailing: 11O P:W DMINISTRATIVEFORMS \FORMSUFFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUT ION () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMI ATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLI () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPH.U.D. ( ) NATIONA INE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES, () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. (4DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DMSION• () OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKUST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT () DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR () DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE N KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT 111 () FIRE DISTRICT S2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () K.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY () RENTON UBRARY () KENT UBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE UBRARY () OWEST () SEATTLE CITY UGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ) HEALTH DEPT Sit SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE ()POUCE ()FINANCE () PLANNING () BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR () CITY CLERK C j ,f l& lENVIR#SERVIES:SEPAMINFO'CNTR` O KC TRANSIT'DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) KC. LAND & WATER. RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE () VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBUC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ITE OF SEA! iTIiL'E - SEPA FO CENTERTRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES DUVVVAMISH'INDIANTRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON OUWAMISH RIVER ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF_COMMERCE CV( MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 1 ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: WDMINISTRATiVE1FORMSICHKLIST.DOC ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKVVILA.WA.US.VWWV SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts ogle of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section 'Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)• Drawings/Plans of project (site plan,-elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice ofAppllcatlon for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section •. State Attorney General •Applicant . *Indian Tribes .. *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record . • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) . • Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan . — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: ADMtNISTRAT1VE\FORMSU CLIST.DOC 1111111 11 1111111 MIC /H TU ILA SEATTLE City of Tukwila Comp. Plan Amendment L07 -066 Rezone L07 -067 Proposed Rezone & Comp Plan Amendment from MIC /H to LI MIC/H to LI Attachment A SANDHU, RAJBIR 2224 KAMBER RD BELLEVUE, WA 98007 SANDHU, RAJBIR 2224 KAMBER RD BELLEVUE, WA 98007. SANDHU, RAJBIR 2224 KAMBER RD BELLEVUE, WA 98007 Mikel Hansen / Sabey Corporation �( 12201 Tukwila International BLVD, \ Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 Mikel Hansen / Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International BLVD Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 Mikel Hansen / Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International BLVD Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 CITY OF SEATTLE — SEPA INFO i\ CENTER — DCLU PO BOX 34019 SEATTLE, WA 98124 — 4019 CITY OF SEATTLE — SEPA INFO CENTER — DCLU PO BOX 34019 SEATTLE, WA 98124 — 4019 CITY OF SEATTLE — SEPA INFO CENTER — DCLU PO BOX 34019 SEATTLE, WA 98124 — 4019 CITY OF SEATTLE — SEPA INFO CENTER — DCLU PO BOX 34019 SEATTLE, WA 98124 — 4019 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT A PO BOX 34023 . SEATTLE, WA 98168 MUKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN, WA 98092 MUKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN, WA 98092 MUKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ✓ 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN, WA 98092 DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE 417 W MARGINAL WAY SW SEATTLE, WA 98106 —1514 DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE 417 W MARGINAL WAY SW SEATTLE, WA 98106 —1514 DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE 417 W MARGINAL WAY SW SEATTLE, WA 98106 —1514 DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ,% 417 W MARGINAL WAY SW SEATTLE, WA 98106 — 1514 GARY MOLYNEUX AIRPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETR RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 Mikel Hansen / Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila International BLVD Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 MUKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015172ND AVE SE AUBURN, WA 98092 GARY MOLYNEUX AIRPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETR RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 GARY MOLYNEUX AIRPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETR RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 GARY MOLYNEUX AIRPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETR RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 KC DEV & ENVR SERVICES SEPA INFO CENTER 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 —1219 KC DEV & ENVR SERVICES SEPA INFO CENTER 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA. 98055 — 1219 KC DEV & ENVR SERVICES SEP INFO CENTER 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 —1219 KC DEV & ENVR SERVICES SEPA INFO CENTER . 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW RENTON, WA 98055 — 1219 ER 10230 -AST MARGINAL LLC TUKWI A WA 98168 HAAS BANK 14900 TERURBAN AVE S 210 TUKWILA, WA 98168 1JN1O11 PACIFIC RAILROAD 1416 DO GE ST 325 OMAHA, E 68179 TEN NT 6505 P RIMETER RD S SEATTL • , WA 98108 EAST M "RGINAL WAY PROPS LLC 10802 E M'lARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA,NA 98168 A SEATT E CITY OF PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 TENANT 10805 T WILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA, WA 98168 BOEING�COMPANY , 100 N RIVCERSIDE M/C 3 -4027 �HICAGO, L 68179 ,ANDHU, RAJBIR 2224 KAMBER RD j 3ELLEVUE, WA 98007 CENANT 0836 kARGINAL WAY S 'UKWA, WA 98168 UTY LP 1 0 ALKI AVE SW 4 SEA jLE, WA 98116 NORTH RN PACIFIC RR CO 777 MA T FORT WOR rH, TX 76102 TENA ♦T 10650 27 TH AVE S TUKWIL , WA 98168 -� BNSFPR�WY'CO PO BO W61089 961089 FORTH WH, TX 76161 MAS 2i, BOB 372 SYNOLDS RD OTHELLO, WA 99344 SEATTLE CITY OF PO BOX 34018 SEATTLE WA 98168 TENr*NT 2601 S 102ND ST TUKA ,A, WA 98168 FARRE L, JOHN & MOIRA 8913 SE 44TH ST. MERCER I$LAND, WA 98040 SEA 700 5 SEAT LE CITY OF - FFD H AVE S 5200 ,E, WA 98104 TENANT 3301 S NORFOLK ST SEATTL1, WA 98118 SHA TA R HYDE THE BO G CO MANAGE LOCAL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS PO BOX 370 SEATTLE, WA 98124 - 2207 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 NANT 110 0 E MARGINAL WAY S TUK L A, WA 98168 E MARG' Q AL WAY PROPS LLC 3006 NOR P WAY 101 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 ROACH, JOHN S 3720 BATH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 GARY MOLYNEUX AIPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT - BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETER RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 TENANT 9905E MARGINAL WAY TUKWV, WA 98168 MIC1- GAN PROPERTIES 5301 2NDAVE S SEATTLE, WA 98124 TEN \NT 10325 - MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA, WA 98168 P1 kel Haviser, / /ahey corf7f4iOn 112-01 T,, /4,,1/4 Internalionae 61:4. lf-rl, piper l wl i WA" 0103 File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: Citylitf Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E07 -016 10/02/2007 10/17/2007 ISSUED Applicant: CITY OF TUI{WILA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Environmental Review (SEPA checklist) for Comprehensive Plan/Rezone application request to change approximately 32 acres from Manufacturing Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC -H) to Light Industrial (LI). Location is south of Boeing Field, bounded by Airport Way S., E. Marginal Way S., S. Norfolk St., Boeing Access Road Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: S. of Boeing Field (Bounded by S. Norfol The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). • Jack Pace, esponsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) To: From: Date: Re: • City of Tuk i -? Department of COMM i ; nity Development Steve Lancaster, Director Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jack Pace Rebecca Fox October 17, 2007 Staff Report SEPA/Environmental Review E07 -016 MIC -H to LI— Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone (Sabey Corporation/Associated Grocers) Summary of the Proposed Action: The applicant proposes to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map designations on approximately 33 acres in the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center immediately south of Boeing Field from Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (M/IC -H) to Light Industrial (LI). The property will be removed from the Manufacturing - Industrial Center for future redevelopment with light industrial and commercial uses. If the Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezone is approved, future development will require project - specific environmental review, as the Planned Action would no longer apply. General Information Project Name: Applicant: Location: Current Zoning: Current Comprehensive Plan: Agencies with Jurisdiction City of Tukwila Associated Grocers /Sabey Company Comprehensive Plan and Rezone —MIC -H to LI Mikel Hansen/The Sabey Corporation Immediately south of Boeing Field in Tukwila. (See attached map) Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (MIC -H) Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (MIC -H) Required Permits /Approvals Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation, and City Council ordinance adoption. Rf Page 1 of 5 10/17/2007 11:21:00 AM �L Nil' 1Ou � t+r vJ i J i 7 �c q nw lI,c'iVi �c 6300 Southce er ou evar , ur e Pawl a, ashington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • SEPA Background This request will be considered in 2007, along with two additional Comprehensive Plan amendments and a rezone request. A separate EPA checklist (E07 -001) was prepared Separate environmental review was prepared for the following: • L06- 093 — Transit Center — Revise Policy • L06- 095— Bonsai Northwest — Change Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map from Regional Commercial Center (RCC) to Low Density Residential (LDR) • L06 -096 -- Bonsai Northwest — Change Zoning Map from Regional Commercial Center (RCC) to Low Density Residential (LDR) A DNS was issued on March 15, 2007. On April 13, 2007, an addendum was prepared due to a wording change in L06 -093. Background The property is the current Associated Grocers warehouse and distribution center. It is approximately 61 acres in area, and is split between Tukwila and Seattle, with approximately 33 acres in Tukwila. This area would be removed from Tukwila's Manufacturing/Industrial Center, and added to the Light Industrial (LI) zone. Additional Environmental Information Traffic Analysis, Mirai (September, 2007) Summary of Major Impacts The primary impact of changing designation from MIC/H to LI will be the potential to develop a greater range of non - industrial uses and activities on the site than is currently allowed. No development is proposed at this time. As this is a non - project action, no specific impacts are addressed under the 16 elements that are normally reviewed in the SEPA checklist. Future development of the site will require project - specific approvals including, for example, site plan approval, design review and approval of building and other construction permits. Subsequent SEPA review will be required in connection with future project - specific proposals. Associated Grocers, the current tenant, is in the process of relocating and redevelopment will occur afterwards. There is no schedule set for redevelopment. Land Use: The proposal will allow the future development of the property with LI uses. The LI zone permits a broader range of uses than currently permitted in the MIC/H zone. This means that the current warehouse /distribution use on site could be replaced with different uses than currently permitted in the MIC/H zone, including office, retail, lodging, and entertainment, as well as light industrial warehouse and manufacturing uses. While project -level plans have not been prepared, it is anticipated that a mix of these uses will be developed on the property. The SEPA checklist states that a likely development scenario includes approximately 700,000 square feet of office development, 550,000 square feet or retail development; 80,000 square feet of lodging (hotel), 60,000 square feet of Rf Page 2 of 5 10/17/2007 11:21:00 AM Q: \COMP PLAN AMEND 2006 - 2007 \SabeySEPAstaffmemo.doc • • entertainment (theater) use, and 100,000 square feet of light industrial uses such as warehousing and manufacturing. These figures may vary once project -level plans are developed. A study conducted by ECONorthwest (August 2007) indicates that approximately 2,500 employees may work on the site with future development. Associated Grocers currently employs approximately 700 to 800. Since the property is directly south of King County International Airport (Boeing Field), future development will need not only to meet the requirements of Tukwila zoning for height, but also that of Boeing Field and the Federal Aviation Administration. Noise: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines consider aircraft noise exposure levels below 65 DNL to be compatible with all land uses. The 65 DNL noise contour around KCIA/Boeing Field encompassed nearly 3,000 acres, but only one -sixth of this area is comprised of residential land uses, according to the 2003 modeling study for the airport. Future development will need to consider noise impacts from airport operations. At the point that project and site plans are reviewed, noise - related mitigation may be needed, especially for hotel, office, and entertainment uses that are allowed in the LI zone. Landscaping: Future landscaping must also be planned to not impact airport operations. Attention shall be paid to height restrictions in the flight path, as well as planting species that will not attract wildlife, especially birds, that could pose a safety hazard to aircraft. Traffic: A traffic study by Mirai (September, 2007) provides much more information than is generally available at this stage of a non - project request. Using on projections and information from the Manufacturing - Industrial Center Planned Action (1997), Mirai's study indicates that proposed future development will generate approximately 2, 315 evening peak trips. With the closure of the Associated Grocers facility, the proposed project would be likely to generate a net of 1, 437 new trips in the evening commute. The attached traffic study assumes development that totals 1, 520, 000 square feet. (This is approximately 30, 000 square feet more than the original applications and SEPA checklist). Based on the development scenario cited above, and with the unused trips from future potential Boeing development (per the 1997 MIC Planned Action), Mirai found that the traffic impacts of the proposed development could be adequately handled assuming that certain improvements were made. The following improvements could be funded through Tukwila's concurrency and traffic mitigation fee process: • The primary access to the AG redevelopment site would have a new signalized intersection on E Marginal Way S located south of the S 102nd Street/ E Marginal Way intersection. Rf Page 3 of 5 Q: \COMP PLAN AMEND 2006- 2007\SabeySEPAstaffinemo.doc 10/17/2007 11:21:00 AM • Two additional secondary access intersections would be added on S Norfolk Street and Airport Way S. At least one of these access intersections would be required to have a signal. • The three signals at S Norfolk Street, S 102nd Street and the new main AG site entrance /exit on E Marginal Way S would be coordinated and the signal operation would be optimized. This would improve the levels of service to LOS C and LOS E at S Norfolk Street and S 102nd Street, respectively. The intersection at the AG site main access location would operate at LOS D. Under these assumptions, in 2013 when the project is fully developed, intersections impacted by the proposed redevelopment at the Associated Grocers site would operate at LOS E or better except for the intersection of S. 112th St. and E. Marginal Way S. This intersection is projected to operate at LOS F, if the currently unused travel demand by the future potential Boeing development were used. Among the six intersections evaluated in this study within the City of Seattle, one unsignalized intersection at S Ryan Way/ 51st Avenue S would operate at LOS F when the unused Boeing trips are added in 2013. The delay at this intersection would further increase with additional the trips for the AG site redevelopment. All other intersections evaluated in Seattle would operate at LOS D or better in 2013 when the trips for the future Boeing and AG site redevelopments were added. The Boeing Corporation reviewed Mirai's "Executive Summary" style memorandum on their study of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed development that could be possible if the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone from MIC/H to LI were approved. In a memo (October 8, 2007), Boeing staff commented on several issues including, the need for and spacing of additional signalized intersections near S. Norfolk Street. The Tukwila Public Works Department noted in a response memo (10/16/07) that detailed site access analysis will be done once a specific project and site plan is developed. Specific mitigations are not necessary for a Comprehensive Plan/rezone application. Addressing Additional Impacts: Other non - project issues /impacts including building height, design review, airport noise, traffic, provision of emergency services will be addressed as appropriate either through the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezone or interlocal agreement process. Impacts of future development on the Tukwila Urban Center, as well as the impacts of industrial land conversion on the Manufacturing Industrial Center will be addressed through the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone review process. Specific traffic, airport noise and other impacts will be addressed once there is a development project for consideration. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance Rf Page 4 of 5 10/17/2007 11:21:00 AM Q: \COMP PLAN AMEND 2006- 2007\SabeySEPAstaffinemo.doc Public Works. Department, Engineering Memorandum TO: Jack Pace, Acting Director of Community Development FROM: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Transportation Engineer DATE: October 16,2007 RE: Boeing Comments on Associated Grocers Site Rezone Proposal This memorandum is intended to serve as a response to the October 8, 2007 letter from Shaunta Hyde, Local Government Relations Manager for the Boeing Corporation. On September 25, 2007, Mirai Transportation .Planning and Engineering (Mirai) wrote an "Executive Summary" style memorandum on their study of the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Sabey Corporation development on the Associated Grocers site. Because the proposal at this time is simply to rezone the property to allow the type and size of development desired by the Sabey Corporation, only a high level analysis of the potential impacts was done at your direction and concurrence. Mirai studied the future conditions to ensure that roadway capacity would be available to the development and that any negative impacts could be mitigated. The intent of the analysis was not to develop site - specific mitigation but rather to determine that reasonable mitigation was obtainable. Also at your direction, Mirai was instructed to account for unused Boeing trips in accordance with the 1997 EIS and Planned Action for the MIC area. The EIS was difficult to interpret and apply because it utilized a different approach than is typically used. I suspect the EIS was developed that way due to the unique work schedules traditionally employed by Boeing — the Boeing afternoon peak hour trips traditionally are in the 3 -4pm timeframe, not the classic one hour period between 4 -6pm that is used for standard traffic analyses. That said, the Boeing EIS set a maximum threshold on the number of employees and impacts were analyzed and roadways built to accommodate them. In order to most accurately calculate the Boeing trips being utilized and estimate the unused capacity allocated to Boeing, Mirai contacted the company's CTR Coordinator, John Hendricks. Mr. Hendricks provided the most current data on Boeing employee travel patterns and Mirai used that information to develop project volumes on the area street network. We know of no other way to best estimate future trip usage and if Ms. Hyde's office has better information, we would be more than happy to use it to update the study. To response more specifically to her comments, I offer the following. p: \cyndy \development review \sabey sepa pw response to boeing.doc 1. The Mirai report was dated 9/23/2005. We assume this is a typographical error. If not, the analysis should be updated to reflect 2007 information. The report was written in 2007 and all analyses were based on the most current data available. The date was clearly a typographical error and a corrected version of the memo is attached. 2. The assumptions Mirai has made for Boeing trips and those not used by Boeing per 1997 EIS appear flawed with the assumption that only 14% of all employees travel during one hour (4:30- 5:30pm). Significantly, no citation is provided for this figure. Therefore, the assumptions used for Additional Trips by Potential Boeing Developments are also likely to be flawed. The City should review this information carefully to determine if these are appropriate assumptions prior to establishing conditions for the AG rezone proposal. Unless Boeing can provide better data, the best available information to estimate was provided to the City from Boeing's Commute Trip Reduction coordinator, John Hendricks. The raw and refined data is attached for Boeing's review. At this time, the City is comfortable with the analysis and the assumptions of used and unused Boeing capacity. 3. No detailed backup information on traffic forecasts or LOS output sheets have been provided to enable a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the LOS results or of potential mitigation. In addition to intersection LOS, link -level directional traffic volume flows should be reviewed to ensure that arterials themselves are performing (especially East Marginal Way and S. Boeing Access Road). A missing piece of this analysis is the demand /operations of the 1-5 freeway ramp junctions and their performance on a general level with ramp metering, etc. Synchro output sheets are attached for review by Boeing. Tukwila does not require link -level analysis in this area and the impacts to Seattle links is negligible. Tukwila also does not require an analysis of freeway ramp junctions nor are they subject to concurrency standards. 4. The assumption that an additional signalized intersection can be constructed on East Marginal Way between S. 112th Street and the Boeing Access Road is flawed. These existing signalized intersections are currently spaced approximately 1, 000 feet apart and are optimally located for intersection progression. Given the current intersection off -set between Norfolk and 112th, the AG redevelopment should be conditioned to realign Norfolk along its northern boundary to align with 112th Street opposite of East Marginal Way. These two intersections are currently only 300 feet apart and do not meet any standard for optimal signal performance or progression. This would be a valuable long range capacity assumption for both the City of Seattle, Boeing, and the City of Tukwila in minimizing the number of signalized intersections along East Marginal Way and maximizing the capacity of this arterial segment. This type of improvement could only be achieved during redevelopment of the AG site. It is recommended that access to the AG site along E Marginal Way be limited to the realigned Norfolk signalized intersection with 112th, supplemented with right -in, right - out only driveways spaced appropriately. All other access should be directed to Norfolk or Airport Way. p: \cyndy \development review \sabey sepa pw response to boeing.doc No site - specific mitigations are necessary for a rezone application. This report is solely to determine the reasonableness of potential mitigation associated with a potential change in land use. A detailed site access analysis will be studied once a site plan is developed and access requirements will be addressed as part of the analysis. Additionally, it is believed that the reference to S 112th Street is an error on the reviewer's part and that it should be S 102nd Street. p: \cyndy \development review \sabey sepa pw response to boeing.doc City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E 01- 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec ei,/ Ci- arc -I#) Project Name: C it (29 (z-" '-' c 'r'1 r5 /l fr. & t -, C, - 140:9 +b � l ,cti-(r6if.)J' 4- 0- Z) �,�, -e �+ ,�f f J-e P -,./14r (40- 0-3 c,., e_ CA s:' -41 q,-v c-o- Address: Ws .. 330 s • N o r fr- r g• 4 (4, z 3. c-= J, Date Transmitted: t J 1 L f f a'7 Response Due by: 10 1 if t o g Staff Coordinator: ec'L" ' Date Response Received: Instructions The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and f) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working days! I.s IN. 1/1 OA- p .n) J C c j— t, e I� t2,1 • AA t- a c-Ptitzvii z fv 642)111.14c,"4— Tee: 1/16 ii/Vlf' In 1e Id-h2r to6 hj Feicl afi TitAt- vI.-r4- Si 0 Ctvkc..c,c YZ s csk- -V i s 1M141 R CV C.:c i- vr• Comments Prepared by: ` Date: 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E 01- ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ' Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec �1 6 r!7 � � h-v-' a � r ± L + f I fll J(.1(ai Project Name: S (L l) �,�, r ter.. to y+ j, arc Pc,/ 3 ('A .sl:} a 4-Cl " c.cry f t ) Address: VO 330 s • N ; ire rk 4 itYro /r Le ay Date Transmitted: PILE/ 07 Response Due by: 101 ir/0/7 Staff Coordinator: Instructions Date Response Received: The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and f) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working days! _IWZ T1,111' is MO 1 - _, L JiII h INA/ a. i. e a,,n z fv w t.�c rte c Stec (114(-- to. re I .4 n 6c) 6 (7) 61-t t -- (U 1.1E — ji /Id ffysiirl.€4715- Comments Prepared by: Date: The Boeing Company P. 0. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 October 8, 2007 Mr. Jack Pace Planning Manager City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 Re: Associated Grocer's Rezone Proposal Dear Mr. Pace: The Boeing Company has reviewed the SEPA checklist and related application materials for the rezone of the Associated Grocers property from MIC -H to LI proposed by Sabey Corporation. Although Boeing does not object to the proposed change from a land use perspective, we do have questions regarding the potential transportation impacts of the proposed rezone on current and future Boeing operations in the vicinity. In particular, we asked Mike Read of Transportation Engineering Northwest to review the traffic study for the Associated Grocers rezone prepared by Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering. Mr. Read had the following comments, which we list below. We request that you review Mr. Read's comments regarding the potential impacts of the AG rezone on Boeing operations, and require additional analysis and/or condition the AG rezone accordingly. 1. The Mirai report was dated 9/23/2005. We assume this is a typographical error. If not, the analysis should be updated to reflect 2007 information. 2. The assumptions Mirai has made for Boeing trips and those not used by Boeing per 1997 EIS appear flawed with the assumption that only 14% of all employees travel during one hour (4:30- 5:30pm). Significantly, no citation is provided for this figure. Therefore, the assumptions used for Additional Trips by Potential Boeing Developments are also likely to be flawed. The City should review this information carefully to determine if these are appropriate assumptions prior to establishing conditions for the AG rezone proposal. • 1 The Boeing Company P. 0. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 Jack Pack October 8, 2007 Page 2 3. No detailed backup information on traffic forecasts or LOS output sheets have been provided to enable a reviewer to determine the appropriateness of the LOS results or of potential mitigation. In addition to intersection LOS, link -level directional traffic volume flows should be reviewed to ensure that arterials themselves are performing (especially East Marginal Way and S. Boeing Access Road). A missing piece of this analysis is the demand/operations of the I -5 freeway ramp junctions and their performance on a general level with ramp metering, etc. 4. The assumption that an additional signalized intersection can be constructed on East Marginal Way between S. 112th Street and the Boeing Access Road is flawed. These existing signalized intersections are currently spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart and are optimally located for intersection progression. Given the current intersection off -set between Norfolk and 112th, the AG redevelopment should be conditioned to realign Norfolk along its northern boundary to align with 112th Street opposite of East Marginal Way. These two intersections are currently only 300 feet apart and do not meet any standard for optimal signal performance or progression. This would be a valuable long range capacity assumption for both the City of Seattle, Boeing, and the City of Tukwila in minimizing the number of signalized intersections along East Marginal Way and maximizing the capacity of this arterial segment. This type of improvement could only be achieved during redevelopment of the AG site. It is recommended that access to the AG site along E Marginal Way be limited to the realigned Norfolk signalized intersection with 112th, supplemented with right -in, right -out only driveways spaced appropriately. All other access should be directed to Norfolk or Airport Way. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Please contact me at 206- 544 -0182 if you have questions or would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Shaunta Hyde Shaunta R. Hyde, Manager Local Government Relations The Boeing Company cc: Janene A. Collins, Boeing Jeffrey R. Adelson, Boeing Rebecca Fox, City of Tukwila Cyndy Knighton, City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Environmental review /SEPA checklist has been prepared for a proposal to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code designations from Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (M/IC -H) to Light Industrial (LI) 33 acres of property generally bounded by S. Norfolk Street, Airport Way S., Boeing Access Road, and E. Marginal Way S. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100, Tukwila, WA 98188. Project Files include: L07- 066(Comp Plan). and L07- 067(Rezone), and E07 -016 (SEPA/Environmental Review) OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: You may provide comments on the environmental checklist by 5 p.m. October 16, 2007. For further .information, see below. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING: You are : invited to comment on the application at a public hearing before the Tukwila Planning Commission, scheduled for October 25, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the Tukwila City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. If you prefer, you may submit written comments for the Planning Commission hearing to the Department of Community Development by 5 p.m. on October 25, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION on this proposal, contact Rebecca Fox at (206) 431 -3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 — Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. SEPA Application Filed: October 2, 2007 Notice of Application Issued: October 2, 2007 Rf Q: \ COMP PLAN AMEND 2006 -2007 \ SabeySEPA & PC Notice-- 10.2.07.DOC 10/02/2007 City of Tukwila Comp Plan Amendment L07 -066 Rezone L07 -067 Proposed Rezone 8 Comp Plan. Amendment from MIC /H to L1 Project Area Attachment A Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I.ittet , govelhirr HEREBY DECLARE THAT: \(' Notice of Public Hearing Project Number • L-010-1 — 16:p-1 Determination of Non - Significance Notice,of Public Meeting Person requesting mailing: 1200acta ri;pic Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3 day of /) in the year 20t7 P AADMINISTRATIVEFORMS\FORMSW FFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION Project Name: C5-_ QC q=1.) V.A.),1C, LoovNip 06-r) A Project Number • L-010-1 — 16:p-1 Mailer's Signature(1,(,42 Person requesting mailing: 1200acta ri;pic P AADMINISTRATIVEFORMS\FORMSW FFIDAVITOFDISTRIBUTION • OWNER BUTY LP 10230 EAST MARGINAL LLC 1150 ALKI AVE SW 4 TUKWILA, WA 98168 SEATTLE, WA 98116 HARRIS BANK 14900 INTERURBAN AVE S 210 TUKWILA, WA 98168 NORTHERN PACIFIC RR CO 777 MAIN ST FORT WORTH, TX 76102 • SHAUNTA R HYDE THE BOEING CO MANAGER LOCAL GOVERNMENT RELATIONS PO BOX 3707 SEATTLE, WA 98124 - 2207 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TENANT TENANT 1416 DODGE ST 325 10650 27TH AVE S 11030 E MARGINAL WAY S OMAHA, NE 68179 TUKWILA, WA 98168 TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT BNSF RWY CO E MARGINAL WAY PROPS LLC 6505 PERIMETER RD S PO BOX 961089 3006 NORTHUP WAY 101 SEATTLE, WA 98108 FORTH WORTH, TX 76161 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 EAST MARGINAL WAY PROPS LLC 10802 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA, WA 98168 SEATTLE CITY OF PO BOX 34023 SEATTLE, WA 98168 MASSA, BOB 372 S REYNOLDS RD OTHELLO, WA 99344 SEATTLE CITY OF PO BOX 34018 SEATTLE, WA 98168 ROACH, JOHN S 3720 80TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 GARY MOLYNEUX AIPORT PLANNING OFFICE KC INT'L. AIRPORT - BOEING FIELD 727 PERIMETER RD SEATTLE, WA 98108 TENANT TENANT TENANT 10805 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 2601 S 102ND ST 9905 E MARGINAL WAY TUKWILA, WA 98168 TUKWILA, WA 98168 TUKWILA, WA 98168 BOEING COMPANY 100 N RIVERSIDE M/C 3 -4027 CHICAGO, IL 68179 FARRELL, JOHN & MOIRA 8913 SE 44TH ST MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 MICHIGAN PROPERTIES 5301 2ND AVE S SEATTLE, WA 98124 SANDHU, RAJBIR SEATTLE CITY OF - FFD TENANT 2224 KAMBER RD 700 5TH AVE S 5200 10325 E MARGINAL WAY S BELLEVUE, WA 98007 SEATTLE, WA 98104 TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 10836 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA, WA 98168 TENANT 3301 S NORFOLK ST SEATTLE, WA 98118 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P -SEPA Planner: (2ebecc ..Fox File Number: j 0 7_ O (, . Application Complete (Date: EDI _Io7) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: LO6 - p6,6 d LO(' -obi; Sabe NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: t4 a i v 1 vINJ`r7 . 1 nol o s �-e (ti � -/-f e� 6-06-0)-1-0 L1 li r !od ✓11Y1d Ct �M >r� ,,� e. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, iridicate,lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. •?3301 '• (orgo, S-F.. Et /O23o E. goy ^d,d bd E. Ma-ymwe to t f. N 4 04°1- &tee,v9 Ac p-d LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). See, A!� DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City.staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: H 1 ( ifetr/i Se. - / _Ca Le (49rp-0 r(d)an Address: I 22-0/ 1-0 14 hilSc I0 - ror- S9etr4-e 13Jv,/ 199° r KwfIR) WA 9 ?148 Phone: 2o6 '111 '5- zW1 FAX: ZOO - 2-92 - /SS/ E -mail: 1•v, i lee( ti S Abe , Corn y. Signature: Date: P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ SEPAApp-6-06.doc December 4, 2006 0323049024 (13aff of) 0003400042 Associated Grocers Property Boundary DRAFT Ref: Tax Lot Combined.cdr Scale in Feet 925 (approximate) AG Grocers Site Seattle, Washington Tax Lot Parcel Numbers SAB-029-00 FIGURE 3 February 2007 Dalton. Olmsted & Fuglevand. Inc. • STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: N/A 2. Name of Applicant: Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila Intl. Blvd., 4`h Floor Seattle, WA 98168 3. Date checklist prepared: September 23, 2007 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The proposal is for an amendment to the comprehensive plan land use map and a rezone of the subject property. This is a non - project action. No development is proposed at this time. Development of the site will require future project - specific approvals including, for example, site plan approval, design review and approval of building and other construction permits. Subsequent SEPA review will be required in connection with future project - specific proposals. There is currently no schedule for future development. Development could occur after Associated Grocers, the current tenant, relocates. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The request is for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone from Manufacturing/Industrial Center - -Heavy (MIC -H) to Light Industrial (LI). No specific development is proposed at this time. LI zoning will allow a greater range of uses than allowed under the MIC -H zoning. Potential future development may include a combination of retail, office, entertainment and hotel uses. As previously stated, the proposal is for an amendment to the comprehensive plan land use map and a rezone of the subject property. No development is proposed at this time. Development will be conducted following subsequent project -level approvals. Agency Comments • • 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Traffic Analysis, Mirai, September 2007. See Attachment C. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Shoreline substantial development permit application, Sabey Corporation 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Comprehensive plan amendment Rezone Site plan approval Building permits Electrical, mechanical and other construction permits Shoreline substantial development permit (if work is conducted in the shoreline environment) 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. This is a non - project proposal to change the designation of the property on the Comprehensive Plan future land use map from Manufacturing/Industrial Center — Heavy (MIC -H) to Light Industrial ( "L1 ") and to rezone the site from Manufacturing/Industrial Center —Heavy (M /IC -H) to Light Industrial (LI). The proposal will allow the future development of the property with LI uses. The LI zone permits a broader range of uses than currently permitted in the MIC/H zone. These uses include office, retail, lodging, entertainment and light industrial warehouse and manufacturing uses. While project -level plans have not been prepared, it is anticipated that a mix of these uses will be developed on the property. A likely development scenario includes approximately 700,000 square feet of office development, 550,000 square feet or retail development; 80,000 square feet of lodging (hotel), 60,000 square feet of entertainment (theater) use, 30,000 square feet of restaurant use and 100,000 square feet of light industrial uses such as warehousing and manufacturing, although these figures may vary once project -level plans are developed. See Attachment A. Heights are anticipated to be in the range of 40' to 120', and will ultimately be governed by applicable FAA regulations. A study conducted by ECONorthwest (August 2007) indicates that approximately 2,500 employees may work on the site with future development. Subsequent project - specific permits will be required prior to development. While the non - project proposal includes a conceptual potential development scenario (Attachment A), no specific development is proposed at this time. 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is for an approximately 65 -acre property south of Boeing Field in the City of Tukwila. The property is located partially in the City of Tukwila and partially in the City of Seattle, with approximately 33 acres (1,438,912 square feet) located in Tukwila. The site is currently the location of Associated Grocers distribution center and is bounded by S. Norfolk St. on the north, Boeing Access Road to the south, Airport Way S. to the east, and East Marginal Way and the Duwamish River on the west. See Attachment B, Aerial Photograph. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? A small portion of the property (approximately one acre) is located in the shoreline area. No other known environmentally sensitve areas are known to exist on the property. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The site is generally flat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately five percent in small areas on the site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil types are generally a top layer of loose to medium dense alluvial sand and a soft lower layer of estuarine silt; both are of varing thickness over the site. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. • • This is a non - project action. Development of the property will require future project - specific approvals and SEPA review. There is no filling or grading proposed in connection with this non - project action. Any proposed filling or grading proposed in connection with future development will be addressed in the SEPA review for future project - specific proposals. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. This is a non - project action. Development of the site will require future project - specific approvals and SEPA review. The potential for erosion will be evaluated in connection with this project - specific review. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to erosion control. Accordingly, no significant erosion impacts are anticipated. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 90 -100 percent, the same as existing conditions. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to erosion control. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. This is a non - project action. Development of the site will require future project - specific approvals and SEPA review. The potential for air emissions, which may include dust from construction, will be evaluated in connection with this project - specific review. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to control of air emissions. Accordingly, no significant air emissions impacts are anticipated. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to air emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 4 • • 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A small portion of the project site (approximately one acre) is within the 200 feet of the Duwamish River. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non - project action. Development of the site will require future project - specific approvals and SEPA review. No future development within the shoreline area is anticipated as part of the proposal, however. Instead, the area within the shoreline setback is proposed to be developed with a landscaped entry to the property, independent of the proposal. See Attachment A. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 5 • 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. After future development, it is anticipated that stormwater runoff will be collected on site and discharged to the City's stormwater system. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to stormwater. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to stormwater. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. The site is currently heavily urbanized with minimal vegetation. Future development will comply with applicable City requirements for landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Future development will comply with applicable City requirements for landscaping. 5. Animals Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X Other types of vegetation — Urban landscaping b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. The site is currently heavily urbanized with minimal vegetation. Future development will comply with applicable City requirements for landscaping. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Future development will comply with applicable City requirements for landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None known. This is a hightly developed urban site. Species tolerant of intensive urban development may be present on the site. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is anticipated to utilize electricity and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements relating to energy conservation. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is not anticipated to include any environmental health hazards. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements relating to environmental health. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is not anticipated to require any special emergency services. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements relating to environmental health. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from I -5 and adjacent surface streets and air traffic noise from Boeing Field. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development may produce noise, including construction and traffic noise. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements relating to noise. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal requirements relating to noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? \The current use of the site is warehouse and distribution. Boeing and Boeing Field are located to the north, I -5 is to the east, and light industrial uses are to the south, and Marginal Way to the west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently developed with a grocery warehouse and distribution center. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? 8 • • This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is anticipated to include demolition of the existing structures on the property. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The portion of the site within the City of Tukwila is zoned MIC -H. The portion in Seattle is zoned IG2 -85. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Comprehensive Plan designation of the portion of the site in Tukwila is Manufacturing/Industrial Center -Heavy ( MIC -H). It is located within Tukwila's Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC). The designation of the portion of the site in Seattle is Duwamish Manufacturing /Industrial Center. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Approximately one acre of the southwestern portion of the site, immediately adjacent to E. Marginal Way South is is in the shoreline area. The portion of the property located in the shoreline zone is currently paved and in use as a parking lot. This area is designated as an Urban shoreline environment. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A small portion of the property (approximately one acre) is located in the shoreline area. No other known environmentally sensitve areas are known to exist on the property. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is not anticipated to include residential uses. A study prepared by ECONorthwest (August, 2007) projects approximately 2,500 people could work on the subject property with future development. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan future land use map and a rezone of the property. In connection with these actions, the City will undertake an evaluation of the proposal's consistency with the existing Comprehensive Plan and with land uses in the vicinity. 9 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is not anticipated to include residential uses. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development will comply with the height limit provided in the Tukwila zoning code as well as the requirements of the adjacent Boeing Field. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Future development of the site will comply with the Tukwila zoning code, including its provisions relating to design review. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development will produce light commonly associated with light industrial, lodging, office, and retail uses. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to light and glare. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. Activities on Boeing Field generate some light and glare, but this is not anticipated to significantly impact the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations relating to light and glare. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Museum of Flight is located to the north of the property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The property is served by I -5, the Boeing Access Road, E. Marginal Way S., Airport Way S., and S. Norfolk St. See Exhibit B. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop is located adjacent to the west boundary of the property, on E. Marginal Way. • • c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development will comply with the Tukwila zoning code requirements for parking. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. In connection with this project -level review, a traffic study was conducted evaluating the traffic impacts of the most likely conceptual development scenario. This study is attached as Attachment C. With regard to required transportation improvements, the study found that improvements to one or two traffic signals in the City of Tukwila, together will limited signal connectivity improvements, may be required in connection with ultimate development of the site. In addition, any development of the project will be required to pay transportation impact fees in accordance with the City's impact fee ordinance. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. The proposal is adjacent to Boeing Field but future development is not anticipated to utilize air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Plan -level traffic analysis indicates the proposal is likely to generate approximately 20,000 or more vehicular trips per day, with net new trips in the p.m. peak hour totaling approximately 1437 trips. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The plan -level traffic analysis indicates that improvements to one or two traffic signals in the City of Tukwila, together will limited signal connectivity improvements, may be required in connection with ultimate development of the site. In addition, any development of the project will be required to pay transportation impact fees in accordance with the City's impact fee ordinance. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future 12 development is anticipated to have a demand for public services typical to light industrial, lodging, office, and retail uses. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This is a non - project action. No development is currently proposed. Future development will require project -level approvals and SEPA review. Future development is anticipated to require electricity and natural gas from Seattle City Light and Puget Sound Energy, respectively. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: /04/07 (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON - PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal is not likely to increase these impacts. The comprehensive plan amendment and rezone will result in a less intensive zoning than currently exists on the site. Future development under the LI zone is not likely to increase stormwater or other discharge to water. The site is currently 90- 100% impervious, as would be the case with future development. Future development is not likely to result in emissions to air, other than temporary construction dust, which will be controlled by best management practices. Future development is not likely to result in the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, as the most likely development scenario include a mix of light industrial, loding, office and retail uses. Future development will produce noise consistent with these uses. Significant noise impacts are not anticipated. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Future development will undergo project - specific SEPA review. In addition, future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal is not likely to increase impacts to plants, animals, fish or marine life. The comprehensive plan amendment and rezone will result in a less intensive zoning than currently exists on the site. The property is currently an intensively developed urban site with little or no wildlife habitat. Future development under the LI zone will comply with Tukwila zoning code requirements relating to landscaping. Future development under the LI zone will discharge stormwater to the municipal stormwater system. No direct impacts to fish or marine life are anticipated. 14 Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Future development will undergo project - specific SEPA review. In addition, future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal is not likely to deplete energy or natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Future development will undergo project- specific SEPA review. In addition, future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposal is not likely to use or affect these areas. A small portion of the property (approximately one acre) lies within the shoreline area. This portion of the property is proposed to be used as a landscaped entry to the property with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Future development will undergo project - specific SEPA review. In addition, future development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposal will allow the future development of the property with LI uses. The LI zone permits a broader range of uses than currently permitted in the MIC/H zone. These uses include office, retail, lodging, entertainment and light industrial warehouse and manufacturing uses. As discussed in the application for the proposal, the new land use designation would allow uses compatible with the comprehensive plan and with other properties in the area. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: The proposal will undergo review for consistency with the Comprehenisve Plan and nearby land uses in connection with the City's review of the proposal. In addition, Future development will undergo project - specific SEPA review, including review of potential land use impacts. Finally, future development will comply with all applicable requirements of the Tukwila zoning code. 15 • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? A traffic analysis has been prepared for the nonproject proposal. The traffic analysis indicates that improvements to one or two traffic signals in the City of Tukwila, together will limited signal connectivity improvements, may be required in connection with ultimate development of the site. In addition, any development of the project will be required to pay transportation impact fees in accordance with the City's impact fee ordinance. Future development is anticipated to have a demand for other public services typical to light industrial, lodging, office, and retail uses. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: According to the traffic analysis, improvements to one or two traffic signals in the City of Tukwila, together will limited signal connectivity improvements, may be required in connection with ultimate development of the site. In addition, any development of the project will be required to pay transportation impact fees in accordance with the City's impact fee ordinance. Furthermore, future development will undergo project - specific SEPA review, including review of public services impacts. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will comply with all applicable local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 16 [111101111- SEPA Checklist Exh A PRIMARY CIRCULATION l u;;�` .3 SECONDARY CIRCULATION NMI PERIMETER ROADWAYS 10.1.2007 FULLER SEARS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN MIXED USE SCHEME* OFFICE 700,000 S.F. RETAIL 550,000 S.F. RESTAURANT 30,000 S.F. HOTEL 80,000 S.F. THEATER 60,000 S.F. LT. INDUSTRIAL 100,000 S.F. THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN FOR A NON - PROJECT ACTION. INTERNAL CIRCULATION, BUILDING SIZE AND LOCATIONS, AND TYPE AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED USES MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN WITH DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW OF PROJECT -LEVEL PLANS. SOUTH SEATTLE SITE SABEY CORP. LEGEND SUBJECT PROPERTY 1•11111■111.11 ZONING DESIGNATIO TUKWILA/SEATTLE CITY LIMITS 1 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering MEMORANDUM To: Jim Morrow, Tukwila Public Works Director Cyndy Knighton, Tukwila Senior Transportation Engineer From: Tom Noguchi, Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering Subject: A Summary of Traffic Analysis Related to the AG Site Redevelopment Proposal Date: September 23, 2007 Introduction The City of Tukwila requested Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering (Mirai) to analyze the traffic impacts of the proposed development at the site currently occupied by Associated Grocers (AG). The study assumed that the proposed redevelopment at the AG site would be completed by 2013. Mirai used the City's 2013 travel demand model developed for the concurrency analysis and calculated intersection levels of service with Synchro. The City of Seattle/ City of Tukwila city limit dissects the proposed redevelopment of the AG site. Mirai contacted the City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development (DPD) staff when this study was initiated. The Seattle DPD staff provided input throughout the study period on such issues as identifying study intersections within Seattle, reviewing trip generation and level of service analysis. This memorandum summarizes the 2013 traffic conditions for the streets and intersections in the vicinity of the AG site with and without the AG site redevelopment proposal. The 2013 traffic conditions include the traffic volumes estimated from potential . developments that have not yet been developed at the Boeing sites along the E Marginal Way S corridor in the Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC). AG Site Redevelopment Scenario and Trip Estimation This study assumed that the AG site would be redeveloped with the following land uses and building floor areas: • Light Industrial: 100,000 gross square feet • Office: 700,000 gross square feet • Restaurants: 30,000 gross square feet Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 1 I M i r a i 1 Transportation Mannino & • Ensinearins • Movie Theater: 60,000 gross square feet • Retail: 550,000 gross square feet • Hotel: 80,000 gross square feet (149 rooms) Mirai estimated the net trips generated by the proposed redevelopment based on these land uses. The existing land use generates a total of 878 vehicles trips during the PM peak hour and the proposed redevelopment would generate an estimated total of 2,315 trips. Thus, the proposed redevelopment would generate an additional 1,437 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. Additional Trips by Potential Boeing Developments The 1997 EIS for future Boeing developments in the MIC assessed the traffic impacts of the developments on the transportation system. The EIS forecast traffic volumes for 2010 based on these potential developments. Mirai estimated the unused travel demand in 2007 that was forecast in the 1997 EIS based on the actual Boeing employment and its employee travel data. The unused trips by Boeing were estimated as follows: • Boeing employees in Duwamish area in 1997: 17,000 • Employees to be added by 2007 (the 1997 EIS): 10,000 • Total forecast Boeing employees in 2007: 27,000 (17,000 +10,000) • Actual Boeing employees in Duwamish area in 2007: 11,924 • Percent employee commuting in vehicles: 73% of total employees • Percent employee commuting during the PM peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 pm): 14% of total employees • Estimated trips to be made during the PM peak hour, if 27,000 employees were present in 2007: 2,732 trips (27,000 * 0.73 * 0.14) • Actual trips made during the PM peak hour in 2007 based on the existing employees: 1,207 trips (11,924 * 0.73 * 0.14) • The unused Boeing trips: 1,525 trips (2,732 - 1,207) Mirai estimated that Boeing has not used a total of 1,525 PM peak hour trips. These unused trips were added to the 2013 traffic forecast. These trips were distributed from Site 1, Site 2 and Site 3 as shown in the 1997 EIS. Please note that the allocation of trips to these sites have not been reviewed nor coordinated with Boeing. It is possible that the development plan included in the 1997 EIS may have been changed. Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 2 M i r a i I 1 i l 1 Transportation Planning & Engineering 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service The City provided the 2007 traffic counts for the study intersections. Figure 1 shows the PM peak hour intersection levels of service and delay in the study intersections in 2007. Based on the City's 2013 travel demand model, the levels of service were calculated . for the intersections in the study area with the unused Boeing trips shown in Figure 2. The levels of service shown in Figure 2 assumed that the signals on East Marginal Way S would be optimized. While the S 112th Street /E Marginal Way and S 112th Street/Pacific Highway S intersections would operate at LOS F, all other study area intersections would operate at LOS E or better. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service with AG Site Redevelopment Scenario The projected net traffic volumes described above were added to the 2013 conditions with the traffic volumes adjusted for the unused travel demand from Boeing in the MIC area. Mirai found that signal optimization would significantly improve levels of service at the intersections in 2013 to accommodate the traffic growth in the future. Figure 3 shows the 2013 PM peak hour levels service and delay at the intersections within the study area with the redevelopment at the AG site. To calculate the levels of service, the following assumptions were made: • The primary access to the AG redevelopment site would have a new signalized intersection on E Marginal Way S located south of the S 102nd Street/ E. Marginal Way intersection. • Two additional secondary access intersections would be added on S Norfolk Street and Airport Way S. At least one of these access intersections would be required to have a signal. • The three signals at S Norfolk Street, S 102nd Street and the new main AG site entrance /exit on E Marginal Way S would be coordinated and the signal operation would be optimized. This would improve the levels of service to LOS D and LOS E at S Norfolk Street and S 102nd Street, respectively. The intersection at the AG site main access location would operate at LOS D. Conclusions While mitigating actions will be required, the intersections impacted by the proposed redevelopment at the AG site would operate at LOS E or better, except for the intersections of S 112th Street/E Marginal Way and S 112th Street/Pacific Highway S. These intersections are projected to operate at LOS F, if the currently unused travel demand by the future Boeing developments along S 112th Street (as described in the 1997 EIS) were realized in 2013, without redevelopment at the AG Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 3 M i r a i Transportation Planning 6 Engineering . site. Any additional traffic from the redevelopment at the AG site would increase delay at these intersections. Among the six intersections evaluated in this study within the City of Seattle, one unsignalized intersection at S Ryan Way/ 51st Avenue S would operate at LOS F when the unused Boeing trips are added in 2013. The delay at this intersection would further increase with additional the trips for the AG site redevelopment. All other intersections evaluated in Seattle would operate at LOS D or better in 2013 when the trips for the future Boeing and AG site redevelopments were added. Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 4 M i r a i Tranaportation Planning 6 Engineering Figure 1. 2007 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay 1 Henderson St Legend Unsignalized Intersection -" Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds / 1 . \\ Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 5 M i r a i Transportation Planning 6 Engineering Figure 2. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay with Unused Trips from Potential Boeing Developments a y� yam. S Hardy c V 14 • y '0• a,. Legend Unsignalized Intersection e.'" Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 12 Delay in Seconds * Delay too high to be calculated by Synchro / ® I, 19 S Norfolk St �1\ 42 125 Q' /0/d Henderson St c S Norfolk St_,__. 4 2 m North 0 Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 6 M i r a i I Trenaportation- Plannino & Enolnaarino Figure 3. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay with Unused Trips from Potential Boeing Developments and Redevelopment at the AG Site North 0 Legend Unsignalized Intersection air Level of Service (LOS) 12 Delay in Seconds Intersection Level of Service (LOS) • Delay in Seconds * Delay too high to be calculated by Synchro Mitigation Option C. Offset AG Site Access Intersection and Coordinate Signal at Norfolk, 102nd and AG Access. //J(. 9/0/ 57 ;` "4/ i 1 ' ,Boeing p,�cess R Ii m a. \ \\ 1 I \\ � / ::.' \\ ", Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 7 13-01 13-01 13-01 13-01 13-01 13-01 13-02 13-02 13-02 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-03 13-102 13-102 13-103 13-103 12:00:00 14:00 :00 14:30:00 22:00:00 22:30:00 Total 05:00:00 05:30:00 Total 00:00:00 04:30:00 05:00:00 05:30:00 05:40:00 05:45:00 05:48:00 06:00:00 06:30:00 06:45:00 07:00:00 07:05:00 07:30:00 08:00:00 08:10:00 08:30:00 09:30:00 10:00:00 10:30:00 11:00:00 12:00:00 13:30:00 14:00:00 14:30:00 22:30:00 Total 06:00:00 Total 05:30:00 Total 5 1 1 21 68 2 1 3 1 1 7 12 1 1 1 22 17 1 27 1 12 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 118 1 1 1 1 23 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 26 1 1 1 93 2 1 3 1 1 7 12 1 1 1 22 17 1 27 1 12 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 123 1 1 1 1 2 -10 . 23:30:00 1 1 2-10 rTotals ,;163 ? . •` : 49 • .19 2-129 ", 05:00: :00 .. -2 -120 k,Total',,' .- _ :2- 122" 00500500 3 1 4 2 -122 01 :00:00: 1 1 2 -122 04 :00 :00. 5 5 2 -122 04'.30:00 ' b• 1 2 -122. 05:00:00 34 34 2-122 05:15:00 . " :2 2 2 -122 05:24:00 ° -, 2 -122: 05:30:00 35 35'' : 2 -122' • 05:35 :00' 2- 122' 05:42 :00" 1 " 1 2-122 . 05 :45:00 ' ` 2 -122 05:48 :00 1' 1 : 2 -1.22 " ` " 05 :54 :00 2=122... 05 :55'.00. 1 1: 2'122` :: 06:00:00 .: 134 -.. 134 2- 122 » »: 06 :05 :00 2 -122, " 06 :12 :00 .'2 -122 06 :15 :00 2- 122 06 :30 :00 85 1 86 2-122 ; . 06:42:00. 1 t 1 2 -122. 06 :45:00 27122 . • 07:00 :00 ' :.258' 258 ' •.2 -122: 07 :15 :00 2 -122: 07:30:00 87 ; 87' 2- 122;: 07:45:00 2 a : ` 2 -122 08:00 :00 ' ' 62 62 2 -122 . ` 08 :15:00 1 1 2.122.. 08 :30:00 , : 16 . " ; . 16 2- 122.::, 09:00:00 .11.. 11. 2 -122 `. , 09 :30:00 ,.. 10': = 2-122 •- 10:00 :00 2 -122 ' . 10:30:00 1- 1 - 2 -122. 12:00:00. 2.122 , 13500 :00 2- 122 "' 1400:00 2.122. 14:30:00 .. _ 1 7 - ' 8 , 2- 122 - ' 14:42 :00 '2 -122 '15 :00:00 2 ..' 5•. ,:. 7 2 -122 15:30:00 1 1 2-122 20 :00 :00' 1 1 2 -122 22:00:00 1 1 2 -122 22:30:00 . 2 2 2 -122 23:00:00• 7 7 2 -25 :06:00:00, 140 " : 140 2 -25 06 :12 :00, 2 25' •06 :45;00 4 2 -25 06:18:00 '2 -25 06 :30:00. 105. 105 2 =25' :06:40 :I 2 -25 '06:42:00.'.1 2 -25.. • 06 :45 :00 '. 2 -25 06 :55:00' 2 -25 ..07:00 :00'• 448. 2 -25 07:06'00 '2-25 07:1'0 :00 • :2 =25 07:15 :00 2 -25 07 :18:00 • 2 -25 07:30:00 ' 149 149 2 -25 07 :40 :00° 2 -25- 07 :45'00' 2 -25 08:00 :00 122 122 2 -25 08 :20:00` 2 -25 : : 2 -25 08:30:00 09 :00 :00: 22 2 -25 .09:15 :00. X2-25 09:30:00 '2 -25 10:00:00 7 25 • 10:30:00-• 2 -25 12:00:00. 2 -25 ' .. 14:00 :00 2 -25 • 20:30:00' 2 =25 0 a. r,. 1 #1,'8 150, • 2=30 05:00:00 -30 05`.30 :00, 2-30• 06:00 :00'' 12 2 -30' 06:10'00;: 2.30 `': 06;1;5;_00" 2?31• 200:00 :0O 2 =31_ 04:00 :00` 2 31' • 05:00:00 ". 10 10 .2 -31 05..10:00" 2 -31 05:50:00' ..2 -31 05`.00'00'; 28, 28 2=31' 06 :18'00 2-31 06 :30 :00 2 -31' 5, 15 :2,31- 07.15 :00 2 -31. 07 :30 :00: 2-31 :08 :00:00, 5 2-88 ' 05:00:00 '4 4 2-88 05:12:00 1 1 • 2-88 ' - 05:30:00 2=88' ':05:45:00` 1' 1 2-88 05 :50 :00: 1. 1 2-88• 06 :00:00 . 29 , 29. 2.88 06:12 :00' 63 : ' 63 `2-88 . 06 :30:00 , 20 . ` 20 :2-88 06 :42:00' 1. 1 2-88 ' ' • '07 :00:00 41 . 41 238 07:30:00. 14 14 2-88 :.: 0745•'00.. .. 1 .. 1 ' 2=88" ' 08 :00:00 I„ 1 2,88"". 083000 :'2 -88' -b' 09:00:00 ;.;'2: ` : •.. 2 '2-88 i• 09 30;00 1 ,' : 1' ".'•. , ':2=88471 14.0000° 1 -.': 2-88 :: 14 :30:00' • '. 14 42;00 ' 1 ~.; w 2-88 M' , 15 30:00`! 2-88'k : 23 :12:001 2=88: 26:30100:' 2- 88;:,.. �Totai• '.{:r 191 'i Y 38 9,r ,-, 238 3-323 06:00:00 6 6 3-323 06:30:00 1 1 3-323 07:00:00 3 3 3-323 14:00:00 1 . 1 3-323 14:20:00 1 1 3-323 14:30:00 1 1 2 3- 323 , ,Total . .. ; 11:::: ' 3 ' '. ' .;, :z 14 3-324 05:00:00 3 3 3-324 05:30:00 3 3 3-324 05:42:00 1 1 3-324 05:45:00 1 1 3-324 05:50:00 1 1 3-324 06:00:00 20 20 3-324 06:12:00 3 3 3-324 06:15:00 1 1 3-324 06:18:00 1 1 3-324 06:30:00 11 11 3-324 07:00:00 33 33 3-324 07:30:00 8 8 3-324 08:00:00 6 6 • 3-324 08:30:00 2 2 3-324 16:00:00 1 1 ' 3-324 c ,Total' ; „'94' ',' 1 '` 3-326 05:30:00 1 1 3-390 05:55:00 1 1 3-390 06:00:00 185 5 3 193 3 -390 06:18:00 3 3 3-390 06:24:00 2 2 3-390 06:30:00 8 8 3-390 07:00:00 84 2 86 3-390 07:30:00 2 1 3 3-390 08:00:00 2 2 3-390 08:30:00 2 2 3-390 12:00:00 2 2 3-390 13:30:00 4 4 3-390 13:48:00 10 10 3-390 14:00:00 5 22 27 3-390 14:18:00 10 1 11 3-390 14:24:00 1 2 3 3-390 14:30:00 1 96 1 98 3-390 14:42:00 1 1 3-390 15:00:00 3 3 3-390 15:30:00 2 2 3-390 22:00:00 1 1 3 -390 22:18:00 1 3 4 3-390 22:30:00 1 1 2 3-390 23:00:00 4 1 6 11 3-390 , Total .398 Ag64 ; � 17,.. It Mi5 79 -` 3-626 05:00:00 1 1 3- 626 06:00:00 4 4 3-626 06:30:00 17 17 3-626 07:00:00 1 1 3-626 14:42:00 1 1 3-626 Sitotalre ro rg 23 1 ' S ;s'; 24H ... 3-800 00:00:00 26 26 3- 800 04:00:00 1 1 3- 800 04:30:00 3 1 4 3-800 05:00:00 9 9 3-800 05:18:00 1 1 3-800 05:30:00 11 11 3-800 05:45:00 2 2 3-800 05:48:00 7 7 3-800 05:50:00 2 2 3-800 05:54:00 1 1 3-800 05:55:00 1 1 3-800 06:00:00 127 3 1 131 3-800 06:12:00 1 1 3-800 06:15:00 2 2 3-800 06:18:00 1 1 3-800. 06:30:00 32 1 33 3-800 06:45:00 3 3 3-801 08:30:00 4 4 3-801 09:00:00 5 5 3-801 09:30:00 3 3 3-801 10:00:00 1 1 3-801 12:00:00 1 1 3-801 14:30:00 2 2 3-801 15:00:00 1 1 3-801 15:30:00 1 1 3-801 16:00:00 1 1 3- 801TotaI4r,«149 ,: '¢ §5 ;i - 1 -; ,;155...:': 3-818 02:30:00 1 1 3-818 05:25:00 1 1 3-818 05:30:00 7 7 3-818 05:42:00 1 1 3-818 05:48:00 1 1 3-818 05:54:00 4 4 3-818 06:00:00 33 33 3- 818 06:30:00 2 2 3-818 07:00:00 8 8 3-818 08:00:00 1 1 3-818 13:30:00 1 1 2 3-818 14:00:00 4 2 6 3-818 14:12:00 1 1 3-818 14:30:00 23 23 3-818 16:00:00 1 1 3-818 17:00:00 1 1 3- 818 22:00:00 1 . 1 3-818 22:30:00 1 5 6 3-818 23:00:00 1 1 3-818 Totak ?63, ; .. 31,; : ;'7 ;:101 3-822 05:00:00 1 1 3-822 06:00:00 1 1 3-822 22:00:00 1 1 3-822 riNIXotal; ; °: 2 s `:':... = 1:`; 3 , 3-825 • 05:00:00 1 1 3-825 05:30:00 1 1 3- 825 06:00:00 6 6 3-825 06:30:00 4 4 3-825 07:00:00 5 5 3-825 07:30:00 1 1 3-825 09:00:00 1 1 3-825 14:00:00 1 1 3- 825 22:00:00 1 1 3-825 0Tota11 :: r19 1 1:> 3-834 05:30:00 1 1 3-834 05:50:00 1 1 9-08 10 :00:00 9=08 10:15:00` 10:30:00'' :9-08 '14:00:049 15:00 :00': 8 �?9.T 655.: 9- 101: 90:0909 9-101. '92 :30 :00 :9 -101' • 03:3900 ' 9-101 '03:48:00 • 9-101' .,. '04:00:00 .15.." 15 • •9 -101: 04 :20:00 9-101. - • :04 :30:00 :22 9-101 04 :45;00 .'.9 -101 04 :50:00 ;9=101 - :05:00 :00'. 165 +' 2 167 9-101 - 05:15 :00 9- 101 •.05:18 :00 9 -101 05 :20 :00. 9-101 05 :25:00, 3 • 9- 101. '05:30:00 394 414 9 -101. • 05:40 :00; 9=101 9=101 05:42:00 05:45:00: 13 9=101 . 05 :48:00 8; 9-101. > 95 :50 :00' 9-.101 • 05:55:00 .. 9-101" '06:0090' :336 336 .' 9 -101: '96:05:00- 9-101 06:12:00 9 -101. • 06:15:00'. 9-101 0618:00- 06:20:00 9-101' :06:25:00" 9=101 06;30 :00: 192".:: 192 9-101" 06:35:00: 9 -101»: 06:40'00 9=101 '06:45:00 12- 9=101 06:50:00 :9=101 '•07 :00 :00 323::'. 323 •9 -101-; 07:15;00. - 9401 '07:18:00 9= 101 07:20 :00.. '79=101 ''• 07:30:00: 101 101'. 9 =101: - 9 =101' 07'4&00 • ' :.9;101 " --.. :08:0900-' i50 9=130 07:00:00 . 1 1 9 -130. ,TotalV ' r ,. "' 7 n "` 7 9- 140' : 05;00 :00 9-140 ` '05:30 :00' 3` 3 9= 140• ' 05 :55 :00 1 1 : 9=140 06;30;00 ' 9- 140 - . 07:30 :00 1 1 9 -140 ' 08 :00 :00 1 1 -9=140 , Total ;p Q ....8 9-150 00:00:00 1 1 9-150 06:00:00 1 1 9-150 07:00:00 1 1 9-150 07:30:00 1 1 9-150 09:30:00 1 1 9-150 11:00:00 1 1 9 -150 11:30:00 1 1 9-150 ,Tot■l Y ? F z . .... x� 9-42 00 :00 :00 9-42 • 02:00 :00 1 1 9-42. 06:00 :00 14 1 15 9-42 • 07:00 :00 8 1 9 9-42 14 :00 :00 17 17 9=42:. 22 :00 :00 20 20 , ,,,Total 4 °: =24, :. ; ,21 22 :.. :,-.51;t9_ 9=48' 06:00:00 1 1 9-48` . ; Tots: 1,i., r " 05 :00;00 6- 6 9-50 .05 :30 :00 9-50 . -. _05:45:00 9-50 06 :00 :00 19 19 9-50. ''• 06 :30:00 4: 4 90 07 :00 :00 07:12 :00 9.50.' ', 07 :30:00 ' :.: ' 2 2 9-50'; i 09:00:00 1, 1 9-50' :`. 14 :30 :00 9-50 22:00 :00 9-50 . Total E' ,'`45 c'. , '' Y 1 '!' 46 .._ 9=51: : . 04 :30 :00 2 2 , 9-51 ':. 05 :00.00 13 13 9-51- N 05 :30:00 ':"` :19 ` _` 19 - 05:40:00 9=51 ' : 05 :45 :00 2 2 9,51 ° "' 0548`00 2 2 9-51 06`00 :00: 9-51, ' • 06 :12:00 1 1 9-53 .., 4 Total'? 122 s 8 .z - X130' -. 9-55: . 06:00:00 1 1 9-55 • '07:00 :00 4 4 ' 9-55:. 07:30 :00 5 5 . 9-55. ' 08:00:00. 1 1. 9-55 08 :30:00 9-55 -',:.f.-, `;. > . :12 , , :12 9=57 05:30:00 1 1 9-57 05:45:00 2 2 - 97 06 :00 :00-, 3 3 9=57 07:00 :00. 1 . 1 9-57 ::: rTotalp:;t 7t , .; - ,; .: "9-59 • 07:00:00 1 1 9-59 ' 07:30 :00 9-59 Total, :," 9-60 05:30:00 1 1 9.60 06:00:00. 1 . 1 9-60 ^: Total:;, :2 2 :. 9-61: 05 :00 :00 1 1. ,9-61 05 :45 :00 3 3 06 :00 :00 9-61 07 :30 :00 9-61 • 13:30:00: 1 1 9-61 14 :30 :00 1 1. 961 22 :30 :00 1 1 9761 9=67 05:50`.00 4 4 967 '" Total -': ° : 42 ,, ; -. 4, 9=77 •.:06 :00 :00 5.. 5 9-77= • . 07 :00 :00> 2 2 : • 9=77 :' : 07:30:00' 9-77 • ' 08 :00 :00 1 9-77 : w,Total t r, ; '.:10 :72,!",./.:.:.';1--:; ` ' 10.:•r 9-80: `06 :00;00 1. 1 9-80 ': Total A, a :1 : , 1: •' ` 9-90 ' . 05 :30 :00 •. 1 1: ' 9-90 06:00'.00 4 : 4 .9=90 • 06 :30 :00 1 '9-90 -- - - 07:Q0 :00. .. 7...,•. 7 08:00 :00 '3 '' 3 9=90 • ' z:;ATotatil, fri.::1.6 t` 5,; , w ', ,,. ..;16'= ' 00:00 :00 ,. • 5 : '. . 9-96 .04:00:00 6 6 9-96. 04:15:00: :996 :.:".04:30:00 - •..:2. .9-96" :'04 :45:00: 1 • 1 .:- 9-98 07:45:00 1: 1 998 07 :48:00 9-98'' .. "07:50;00 ..9-98 r" 08:00:007 59 408;05:90 ' X98 ° ` 08:06 :00 : 9=98' 08:15:00._ -. .: 2 :. , 2 ' ' 9=98 ,' - -'08 :30 :00 ` '14; . 14. • 9-98 .08:35:00 1 - ' 1 ' 9-98 " 0845 :00 1 1 -:' 9-98, 09. 00:0.0. " 12 12. _': 9=98. 09 :30:00 , 6, 6 ".. •• " 9-98 _ 12 00:00,.: 9- 98 :;'-: rgitrOtalW, - 4429 ` pia'' ?r� r k; 429 `` 9-99 • . +V 00:00 00 ... 1' :1 9-99- 05 00 00":" .-9 =997.' '',05:397.00- .9-99 0600:00 4" ; . 4 06 :3000 ,9-99 "07:00 :00 4 : 4 ,,.. 9-99 ° 07 :30 :00 1 1 07:45:00 1 1. 9-99 ' °' 08 :00 :00 3. 3 "9-99 ' 08 :30 :00 -. 2 . 2 '. 949 09 :00:00 ";1, 1 . ; 9-99 :' - fiTotal _ ;y27' , 0 ; x.:: a 9-,._:,Y1127 . City Building Building Nm Addressl Location Count Seattle 7 -27 Markov Building 7300 E Marginal Way WA019 2 Seattle 3 -323 Rapid Prototyping Lab 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 13 Seattle 3 -324 Engineering 7500 E Marginal Way S . WA019 92 Seattle 3 -326 Pneumatic & Calibration Lab 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 6 Seattle 3 -350 Hangar -Chase Plane 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 2 Seattle 3 -353 Parts storage 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 7 Seattle 3 -369 Paint Hangar 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 6 Seattle 3 -380 Paint Hangar 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 154 Seattle 3 -390 Flight Test Hangar 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 573 Seattle 3-626 Test Support Bldg 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 23 Seattle 3 -800 Customer Delivery Center 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 705 Seattle 3 -801 Flight Delivery Center 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 140 Seattle 3 -818 Quick Change Building/Wire Sho 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 92 Seattle 3 -822 Fuel Control Bldg 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 3 Seattle 3 -825 Office 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 19 Seattle 3 -834 Crew Support Building C -5 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 8 Seattle 3 -840 Fire Station 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 42 Seattle Lift Station 7500 E Marginal Way S WA019 345 Seattle 2 -10 Warehouse 7701 14th Ave S WA019 232 Seattle. 2 -15 Plant Services Terminal 7701 14th Ave S WA019 139 Seattle 2 -122 Integrated Aircraft Sys. Lab 7701 14th Ave S WA019 778 Seattle 2 -123 Central. Utilities 7701 14th Ave S WA019 10 Seattle 2 -30 - .. North Elect Equip House 7755 E Marginal Way S WA019 20 Seattle 2 -22' ; Cafeteria / Theatre 7755 E Marginal Way S WA019 1 Seattle 2 -25 -.- ; Company Offices., Employment 7755 ,E Marginal Way S WA019 1113 Seattle 2 -120 = Central Accumulation 7755.E Marginal.Way S WA019 2 Seattle 7 -73 Boeing Business Jets 8285 Perimeter Rd S WA019 . 22 Tukwila 13-01 Military Flight Center 10002 E Marginal Way S . WA023 90 Tukwila 13 -02 - Flight Center Maintenance 10002 E Marginal Way .S WA023 3 Tukwila 13.03 Military Flight Center 10002 E Marginal Way S WA023 106 Tukwila 13 -102 Stall 71 B 10002 E Marginal Way S WA023 1 Tukwila 13 -103 Stall 72A 10002 E Marginal Way S WA023 1 Tukwila 9 -150 Employee Activity Center 10500 W Marginal Way S WA023 5 ;Tukwif f1'1 X14 f .' u4tol of $eruices' Cl�'n'te : g' :, 2925X$ pothS_t is , : WAO23 1M1:0 UMW i 7 MA fvr`S c 3teente 7 " 0.92510114M. 1 fi r W.81. Yff.81. 2314 MICR NOM liMst ,1✓`t to" 'r,33arRiaes. Center, 2925jS 1 12t1jSt 5 3 ` w _. r WIW�Wp2St ; '.b 78i6' Tukwila 2 -31 :° ° :: North.Office'e'Z 7755E MarginalWay.S _ . WA023..' 146 Tukwila ` 2-40 Factory &:Storage 7755. Es Marginal :Way :S WA023 6 Tukwila 2 -80. Noise Engineering Lab = 7755 E Marginal Way S WA021 1 Tukwila 2 -81 Noise, Lah. 7755 >E Margginal Way -S WA023. 157 Tukwila 2-83 New. Supersonic. Windtunnel 77.55-g Marginal Way S WA023 1 Tukwila- 2 -85' Central' Utilities 7755E Marginal Way S : WA023 . ` . 20 Tukwila: 2-88 Wind Tunnel Complex 7755E Marginal Way, S WA023 : 234 Tukwila 249, Butler+Bld o ; ,_ 7755EtMac obi. w:0-,,s,_ . - . W6023 . ; ; 3 , -', lF P , ii.c.�...t._�.,::a�._��a Tukwila p f.7 " "z �, 9-42 , V.�7 r. , t?c��:i(Y,C.b+' 'a' --&..- .,. :__.-. . .�.::�r.�,aacFi.�..df,...., -... ...,a.�,a�.:Ca. =~- +7(i ni t - 7,7"4',x' -`f;'. - ;. �._xJ -� ii... i; - T 1 ` t i.w'..�1 �k �..F�' �' 7. a ...tsm� :..lro. Gate J` =26 9725 E Marginal' Way S WA023 • 63 Tukwila 9-48: :_: Model Shop 9725 E Marginal Way. S WA023:.` 4 Tukwila 9 -50: - Support Building 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023: - 43 Tukwila .. 9 -51 :. ;° Facilities ` 9725 E.Marginal W, ay S : WA023 ° 266 Tukwila ; 9 -52 :: Hazardous Storage &Paint Faci 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023. Tukwila . 9 -53 Integ. Tech. Devel. Lab ` ._ 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 . 119 Tukwila 9 -55 Employee Services Ctr 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 11 Tukwila 9 -57 Support for 9 -52 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 4 Tukwila 9 -59 Security - 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 1 Tukwila 9-60 Flammable Storage 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 2 Tukwila 9-61 Environmental Services 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 9 Tukwila 9-67 Data Destroy Bldg 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 4 Tukwila 9 -77 Range Building 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 10 Tukwila 9 -80 Sonic Test Facility 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 1 Tukwila 9 -90 - Office 9725E Marginal Way S WA023 15 Tukwila 9 -96 Office 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 724 Tukwila 9 -98 Office 9725 E.Marginal Way 5 - WA023 379 Tukwila 9 -99 Controls Development 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 25 Tukwila 9 -05 Environmental Office 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 2 Tukwila 9 -08 Office 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 580 Tukwila 9 -101 Manufacturing 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 1807 Tukwila 9 -110 Office 9725 E Marginal Way S, WA023 20 Tukwila 9 -120 Engineering 9725E Marginal Way_ S WA023 49 Tukwila 9 -130 Office 9725 E Marginal Way S WA023 7 Tukwila 9 -140 Photo Lab 9725 E Marginal Way S - WA023 8 11648 Building Count Total Shift Start Total 11924 North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field North Boeing Field plent.2 Plant Z Plebtf•Zi PleritZ' Plana Plent2,-, Platit2. Plant '2 Military Flight Center Militery.iFligtit Center _ militairyjEjimt-conter MilitaAFIt§ht„Center: Military Fli§ht Center . Oxbow ogstoteasoi,ramette-0 COOttriatitohtiOlifet cirsogerisiroji:Weimito pram-- prat 1:2 :,,,,, Plant eralif;2 Plant . . RIali.W.,.:. -ifiL'IMILTNEEEM" woloptairceriter - Develogooramenter Developmental COW- Ere9e1Wriiblifl gent& Developmental Developmental Center, " Building Count Total Shift Start Total 11924 11648 2232 1931 2863 2956 201 221 ‘ 161,17, 1751 4153 4539 27 7 496 519 11648 • 4: Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center _ Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center. Developmental Center Developmental' Center Developmental Center Developmental Center Developmental Center 11-1.4-N. ,,:,..,-.-11:,:, :.;,-,‘:-.2 ,...-,..--..;.:J.:-, :,..-y•-•-,-.7,•:::,•,i,,,.,- :11..,,„, ,,..-1114.',4N:::-.: ,09.!(31,t.QC:r:: ',..-:::;,-,•-,:-,;;.-4..:-..., ,...7..7.-„: 7.-.:-..'5.:::...'•'.- '1..7.: '4,,,`,::: -!:-..::::.•:-;': 141. r.,..:,.,1910,;097,-. ;.,,,-....;(..,s4..i. .,,•, ''.:.:.::.,-....:::. '',.5...i.:,..4.:.:.....::: 11,144(.. ...1.13,-:90:(op, „ ;..„...,::,....1..,:„.-:. '•;,:ci.::,.. :1. :4 ' • '•-i'' ...`;:.+.--:•;.:• ': :'-'".:',1..,•-•.. • 1114,N:' :‘,1*0000.., •.--..* .' -1.--.7': *.:.f.".:""'-'"..-.:' .- :.,'--•.': .**.!•:,:,....... .."....-:';'- 1:1-14#: :...20.7.0000' • •:-..2 :.. --*J”. , -1,:*:-;. •:_:,•. - 7,.'.'"- - ..,::**„.;*:::7":"." 1l-14-N. :_22:00:00 : Y.:-.-'..,' ;. „.----.:.... ••••::'.',...: -......,•.: -,,:';.i-- 2- ''....• • 11-14.4■1:. •„*.21:0o.m--. . • - .:•'.:, .',,i'-:,'.,...:,-,..' .,_.•.; • ... c._-- ,.:-.,-•:.,.....1.-:,',....: -11=1.444; . , Total. --. 792 7 .. -,13 - - - -812 :"..11-7.147.4- 0000:00.: "..:4-.:47:5,..):.' i1;',..:':...ti",::::..':. 1-:::-::::: "...” '-'' .„.-•..-..' ."0".:".;'.-" •.:.11,14-.15.: '-f--Q1;:Q.9:09-- -.41'. 1:-•:':.;•:•‘,-..:P-4"-:1.4,:'.":- *J.:- '..,..:."*".:,,s.:,?....,..."7. 11',14,8-1:.: ':024590..." .-J4-.;:-.-.",,:,*:*-- ."'.;..',?...74.!1'",::"...::::::::: .7.......i-',172,;.!:;i. -:-.','...'::A.::,..7.)" 11.444:" ::0390:00.-• ,..1::.'.',..'::;...*;....-i' ::-.;•.:;.n1*. .-,.;-.,. ".:-,,-.:,..)1:-•:;,:*?.. :'•:.-:.::.:;*, 1 • 11=14.,-8:7 ;...'03:45.0.01`. .1' c.'1,-,:.:...- ....-...:;,.:,-,;.-: :-..-......,-3.-:.:-.... 11,144 - .1,04:00:00 ",-.,...T. 2. ".:2'.;-:'".,i, ";. 4. .-" .". "1 , ...."..:-.; .4."..." ; • " 2 ' :-, -. • 11-14-5 - : f-', :-*J•-• .:7- .. -' -;:..,:f..' • -";;** 1 '-.*. • 1.1-144 -.. =.05:.00:00. -)......:':-.20..... •%:.-."-"."., -:..' ;:::.: ,20'-',•‘ :. '1,1=144:- '-'90:-.10:00,. :,..';...,2....-..-:-,. :.;-'',:.';".;?.'"::.;..- ! - • -.-.'.; .'....:-..-. ...•,::: "-•:...• ,:.11-144,1 ..0..5.10:99.-" 1:•...':,.;f27.'.•'.:.7,:•. •:.:.17:•:....',.•-••••:::.•':' ...";'•'•,.•••-..-,: "".-7.-.•"•'• ': ,;:': 27,' :''..!"' 11;1+4.: -..,- ; ;op-, ,....-;:::.4 .-,::.• ..•:::•'..'7.:.,'.-.'.:.:.:,.,' ' '2:',.,--.:-:::•:,;:; ::,"•:::-,1‘14.,?..;' 1:1-14,4...:. ;961 :15:00.. •••••"••7•,:::'4":. ...,,,'' .i..,::•..:•::-`: •■:•-:.•, .-..:".";•::3:-...:`...:'::::':.:•.1 .....--." ;•-i-:--.• ...y:.:: 11,144: .}.9„610:00 ,.: -.•••.i:, 100.-..:,•:. .,...:."..,••••,5:'..Tr..,,:-:'. '..:•:, -..-.:.,,,:::,.: 7:.:-,: 100 .• 11-144.:: -1:1.645.;09:: ....,.,-10'....:-: 9;.:-‘-, --- . :,-.,:: ::..',.;::,:., -.-.::...,-10 •:..-. 11-144. 707:00:0P- !:-..::g9o.--,:i. ,:::':-',..::-::- :.,.: -,:,..,:::...,.-....,...:,,, 290 .....:',•:, -11;1478"- ...97:15:90:. ''f• :6 -- -.--. ..:: •.'. -.•:,•:•:,. :.* ..:*:. • • "........:;3. "Ti:;-. '7 ' "7 11-14"+"S: '.."Q:Z:401QQ, -'".. A19•.V. .:-• ':.'-''•:: .,1".•;,,. ' :•••'- ' -...-r-';',:::". --•:-'.:•:119 -'••,:- • i1.,..1*.p..: ..'-9744:01::!:.•..;,;-..1-.4,2:.-..-..... :-.•Ii:,;..-.,:.,•••,..•:;....? .„:, .,..,..:,,.::.:A., `...;';',,6i,.,:-..,'.." 11,1447: :41k9000 .: 7177,1:.: "7 ',::t"':.:ZY,;;41'''..:';:::" .■$.2‘,":"'i•-. ..... - '" 11'71.441;. 7.._081500': 1 :::,.7-:...?.;,..-;;,..',2•;;;;.:, .,'.77,4,,,;:0- ,I,.,‘::1:..'-":: -,11,144.:1 :;..0..03,090 -5 '3,,,:r.,.-..-76:,,,,-:. ..,,,..',7:::..... ' '..,...‘,,`.. ...%. 'AV '--11,144::: :::()84()(10.: ':"*...*.::7--..1',:'-.!,:f 7:•'.:....::,_-:: "':*.; - :'';''.,;'!"-:;::,:!.(.., ., 11-144,": '.',..0.9too'.m.:- ...-,,.,,:-.; 19 19 11-14.4.:::.1::091009 *.k7..-'1*. - 7 :.-,::-,.-,-. ,.::::-,.;%.'.1,:''....: 7-- ..1%-..::, .,-',,:-'-.- '.•-•,.',::-. '1' • 11,144:: :40!00,930-. -,:'..:1:::;",.-.- :.;'"-ri177.. ;., ::....:;?,.• ..;-11,..7 4 1114-8 -," -1:110000`-.: -'.:,'....:::2;,,:'...:;... ':.:-.Z;:..r..7,>:,:,..,..!"' :'..:11..---'"-,:-."-:•:".,-.;-' ".,.•';'*--. • '1,..." '. 11.144.S: --,29.00t00 p, ,,;',....,:n. .;'..':" ',.... ' . .:"."::1 -.?:-::,..;.--. !T:::::... 2 '.z.."4,";i... .:;...11-144 . • .TOtal. ' ". '' . 817 - ••'.. .:::-- • ". •.: •• 7 .„-..,. ..,,..-:". 874 , •,• 13-01 05:00:00 , .. 3. . 3 13-01 05:30:00 * • 11 1 ' 12 13-01 05:48:00 • • 3 ' ; ' 3 • 13-01 06:00:00 27 ' • 27 13-01 ' 06:15:00 • 1 ' 1 13-01 . 06:30:00 • ,10 • ' 10 13-01 07:00:00 4 4 13-01 07:30:00 1 ' , 1 13-01 07:45:00 1 • • , 1 13-01 08:00:00 1 1 percentage of total traffic 0.14 Shift 1 Shift Start Building Time 2 3 Total 411141' : µ'03.00'o0 ' ... <'.. i . . s .1 ' _ :1 `. : ::11141ai'7 ': 1... 1 . _x1 :. .3 ° S1$1'441 :1; 6_d 4 ... °f6" 1 " 'r_ . ....t . ... ._...r '''V2....-!.. \. `." 11.44 ; 06'00:Q0 , �„15,y x„ .r... s; ,4; ,, ;;15 M.. 0630:Q0t '8 - :1'.. `:a, ,..w t ,<,8 :':., • ,, 1' '{t4 �..?/06_ 500 1 ate,....: _ 1 °'.. 11114_. ? ".910 . _a. "1 ... -., ;,. _ _ Es`` . r: .. :1 4.i4?r ?;;1'114g;'. 0 ' :liQ., ,i,-'37 .,.. :.. __`...'. .._.. 37.zµ.. ;1114.4 ;:0 f5 401 ::1 ; ~ .. r t :c 11:]14. < r07'3Q'0% .,:9 • .114.14 '_..O45O f. ,,. 1 • ..., ..- x -`1 -.. . ;-51;1114 :7 :108QD 01 5, ?,i8 s Aa .. ` T N. ':8 .., C1 1_f 1.4L ' VQ.0JW j'e... I•.k Ni,. i' • ,6s9T i -.. 7 .4 ,. v;2 ..ea ;::,....1.11,114.: 1,1430'00. : ?:_,e_ :..: y1._.. :_ _.:._.: .... �.:.:.._1: < _.. •114 1$40 00 1 1 ='�t :1::;11;74: ;'16.00:00, `.r:.',.... _ ..:.' :1 • :__. .z:. ,12; A... 14..?. 4 Total•• 97:•:•,••.. , 15 .. •• .3' .. • - 115 17, 41414 ;BOOoc. ....::1:0' ... ._� . .:.. _. 10_ .. . c11J4 =N> 00 ' s' A27 2 '41-14-N . 3 45:0Q 3 3 .4711 0fc0 .w .6 .' . _ _ , .„ . ... . • .... 6 ry �:;) ' L,. � �e�,y, ' {44;`14 =r! /�S �/� ^,s W7: yytt 7:- .��3`.:51i:..... ... ...�t.`. ... '.piss'_.. i_. '.5. :µ11,144;.1A1 :;0S15;a0� COW :.•,.G - gx. ... s, Y,..� t r , . , :.''.'.51-,t.". '11;14 -N:. 40530001:, " { : :31 "._. ` _ .. 31 ... ;C 1 i4N "µO5•,4000 . ..1 ._ ' '. ° _.. 1 ' *._1114411 P;l ;14.---=Eli,-M...=.,. " C ' ' `'' •" tt'41 ;Ng %.0 0Q'000 # :ifl. :'.'.,.'-••=.'.-"I'-','-• -. n x ,,YT4 t O! , ;� :.'` a P. _ _ ••1 -1;;t 14=N l;Q8115.00'- a;,.: s4'.a ,. '' { ti -, .:..c.== 4 , . . ,'11,14-N" f``06 3Q4)j •b,,,4';.. r.. :.. .. ... s° . :91.. . iti11,it $1. "u06 440 0O , .1 ' '` ::1 ••;e +. 1'114 =�. i x'06:45 00 `?.. -4. -.: '. .° 4 - . `1;1::144;1 "07-Ob .14, '81 : .. 1...': -;, :.. 1',1 �14 1 *'07 25:00 '. :' `•1- F✓ a "•7. ': i s _ . 1;1 -14N, .: ,(174.01, L, ...9 :4 - k... ` "1.; 94 ... ;1.41'414'1$: G 'rr: 3 < "'.° ' ., . w' !':. . -: , 3 .J.�s1ti '�j•, ,ilf �VC!SiTVr!!+i� 'V C'' q a+�+ ."". i't{ l -� r� -- .11-'t' .11 ;08:3.100 0:'.;:4Z, ' t .22 •• ',14.N, .'08:45'00 ._ .:1:,: _ _ ' ` . _ .'.1 6:00:00 2,111 6:30:00 1,095 6:05:00 2 6:35:00 1 6:10:00 6 6:40:00 8 6:15:00 52 6:45:00 54 6:20:00 3 6:50:00 5 6:25:00 4 6:55:00 1 6:30:00 1,095 7:00:00 3,152 6:35:00 1 7:05:00 2 6:40:00 8 7:10 :00 1 6:45:00 54 7:15:00 36 6:50:00 5 7:20:00 7 6:55:00 1 7:25:00 2 3,342 4,364 7:00:00 3,152 7:30:00 . 1,014 7:05:00 2: 7:35:00 0 7:10:00 1 ' 7:40:00 4 7:15:00 36 7:45:00 30 7:20:00 7 7:50:00 3' 7:25:00 2 7:55:00 1 7:30:00 1,014 8:00:00 652 7:35:00 0 8:05:00 1 7:40:00 4 8:10:00 3 7:45:00 30 8:15:00 13 7:50:00 3 8:20:00 3 7:55:00 1 8:25:00 1 4,252 1,725 8:00:00 652 8:30:00 214 8:05:00 1 8:35:00 2 8:10:00 3 8:40:00 1 8:15:00 13 8:45:00 5 8:20:00 3 8:50:00 0 8:25:00 1 8:55:00 0 8:30:00 214 9:00:00 149 8:35:00 2 9:05:00 0 8:40:00 1 9:10:00 0 8:45:00 5 9:15:00 4 8:50:00 0 9:20:00 0 8:55:00 0 9:25:00 0 895 375 total 4:30 -5:30 traffic 1,643 976 Calculation of number of trips to be added to account for unused Boeing demand Boeing employees in Duamish area in 1997 17,000 Additional employees by 2010 (for the Proposed Action altemative in the 13,000 Additional employees by 2007 (for the Proposed Action alternative in the 10,000 Estimated Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 27,000 Boeing employees in Duamish area in 1997 +Additional employees by 2007 (for , the Proposed Action alternative in the EIS)= 17000 +10000 =27000 Actual Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 11,924 Shift start total base on start time shift data given by Boeing Percentage of employees resulting in vehicle trips 73% Total vehicle trips / Total workforce = 7681/10461 = 73% Percentage of Daily trips affecting the4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic 14% (Total 4:30 -5:30 PM traffic) / (Actual Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007) = 1643 / 11924 = 14% Total 4:30 -5:30 PM traffic = 10% of the shifts strating between 6:00 -7:00 AM + 15% of the shifts strating between 7:00 -8:00 AM + 75% of the shifts strating between 8:00 -9:00 AM , Estimated Trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 2,732 Estimated Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 x Percentage of employees resulting in vehicle trips x Percentage of Daily trips affecting the4:30- 5:30 pm peak traffic = 27000 x 73% x 14% = 2732 Actual trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 1,207 Actual Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 x Percentage of employees resulting in vehicle trips x Percentage of Daily trips affecting the4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic = 11924 x 73% x 14% = 2732 2007 Trips to be added to account for unused Boeing Demand 1,525 Estimated Trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 - Actual trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 = 2732 - 1207 = 1525 Shift 1 2 3 < : Total, ' Custom`�e`r`SeviceiV rater S170:6 11, 3 1751 Milta .` "Flight_ Center 191 - 275 3 221 G'tR�. C Y9� ..t.~AC aj-'.0 .! ^i 'sre•> ?+�; 7 t r, } T' 7 = }y .t S 4s �jK. j V C .1' a� �T,I.t'3't •' S x ;S „^"s�R5:1 .1i :�. Plant 2 :: 2683 202 71 2956 North Boeing Field 1444 377 110 "1;93'1 Developmental Center 4222 = 231 86 4539 Oxbow 7 0 0 10748 : 883 293 ,,.11924 Summary History by Site Across Mode Alternate Commute Modes ry Bike Bus Carpool Tele Train Van Walker 980s 410s Workforce traffic% Plant 2 18 62 166 780 8 211 1 265 224 4,603 0.82 DC 78 65 210 589 42 232 0 623 213 5,367 0.87 Thompso - 6 5 11 76 1 17 0 47 44 491 0.83 Total 102 132 387 1,445 51 460 1 935 481 10,461 0.73 7,681 48 176 58 640 292 Bike Bus Carpool Tele Train Van Walker 980s 410s Workforce Plant 2 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.05 1.00 DC 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.11 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.12 0.04 1.00 Thompso 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.10 0.09 1.00 Total 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.05 1.00 Calculation of number of trips to be added to account for unused Boeing demand Boeing employees in Duamish area in 1997 17,000 employees by 2010 (for the Proposed Action alternative in the EIS) 13,000 employees by 2007 (for the Proposed Action alternative in the EIS) 10,000 Estimated Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 27,000 Actual Boeing employees in Duamish area in 2007 11,924 Percentage of employees resulting in vehicle trips 73% Percentage of Daily trips affecting the4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic 14% Estimated Trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 2,732 Actual trips affecting 4:30 -5:30 pm peak traffic in 2007 1,207 2007 Trips to be added to account for unused Boeing Demand 1,525 Shift 1 2 3 Total Work City Budding Shift Start ' Emplid Emplid Emplid Emplid Seattle 00:00:00 2 2 Seattle 03:45:00 1 1 Seattle 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 04:30:00 1 1 • Seattle 05:00:00 16 16 Seattle 05:30:00 18 1 19 Seattle 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 06:00:00 76 1 77 Seattle 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 06:30:00 50 50 Seattle 06:40:00 1 1 Seattle 06:45:00 3 3 Seattle 07:00:00 240 240 Seattle 07:15:00 2 2 Seattle 07:30:00 46 46 Seattle 08:00:00 30 30 Seattle 08:15:00 1 1 Seattle 08:30:00 12 1 13 Seattle 08:45:00 1 1 Seattle 09:00:00 9 9 Seattle 09:15:00 1 1 Seattle 09:30:00 3 3 Seattle 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 12:30:00 1 1 Seattle 14:00:00 2 5 7 Seattle 14:15:00 3 3 Seattle 14:30:00 8 8 Seattle 15:00:00 2 2 Seattle 15:30:00 1 1 - Seattle 16:00:00 8 8 Seattle 18:00:00 1 1 Seattle 20:00:00 1 1 Seattle 22:30:00 1 1 Seattle 22:45:00 3 3 Seattle 23:00:00 2 2 Seattle Total 523 29 8 560 Seattle 10-16 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 10 -16 Total 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 03:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 03:45:00 1 1 1 3 Seattle 11 -14 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 05:00:00 6 6 Seattle 11 -14 05:30:00 6 6 Seattle 11 -14 06:00:00 15 15 Seattle 11 -14 06:30:00 8 8 Seattle 11 -14 06:45:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 .06:50:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 07:00:00 37 37 Seattle 11 -14 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 07:30:00 9 9 Seattle 11 -14 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 08:00:00 8 8 Seattle 11 -14 09:00:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 15:40:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 16:00:00 12 12 Seattle 11 -14.. 20:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 Total 97 15 3 115 Seattle 11 -14 -N 00:00:00 - 10 10 Seattle 11 -14 -N 02:30:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -N 03:45:00 3 3 Seattle 11 -14 -N 04:00:00 6 6 Seattle 11 -14 -N 04:30:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:00:00 38 38 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:15:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:30:00 31 31 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:40:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:45:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -N 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:00:00 107 107 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:10:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:15:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:30:00 91 91 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:40:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 06:45:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -N 07:00:00 282 1 283 Seattle 11 -14-N 07:25:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 07:30:00 94 94 Seattle 11 -14 -N 07:45:00 3 3. Seattle 11 -14 -N 08:00:00 65 65 Seattle 11 -14 -N 08:30:00 22 22 Seattle 11 -14 =N 08:45:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-N 09:00:00 13 13 Seattle 11 -14 -N 09:30:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -N 10:30:00 - 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N 16:00:00 1 2 3 Seattle 11 -14 -N 18:00:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -N 20:00:00 7 7 Seattle 11 -14 -N 22:00:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -N 23:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -N Total 792 7 13 812 Seattle 11 -14 -S 00:00:00 5 5 Seattle 11 -14 -S 01:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 02:45:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 03:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 03:45:00 1 3 4 Seattle 11 -14 -S 04:00:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14-S 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 05:00:00 20 20 Seattle 11 -14-S 05:15:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -S 05:30:00 27 27 Seattle 11 -14 -S 06:00:00 114 114 Seattle 11 -14-S 06:15:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14 -S 06:30:00 100 100 Seattle 11 -14 -S 06:45:00 10 10 Seattle 11 -14 -S 07:00:00 290 290 Seattle 11 -14 -S 07:15:00 6 6 Seattle ' 11 -14-S 07:30:00 119 119 Seattle .11 -14-S 07:45:00 4 4 Seattle 11 -14-S 08:00:00 65 65 Seattle 11 -14-S 08:15:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 08:30:00 20 20 Seattle 11 -14-S 08:40:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14-S 09:00:00 19 19 Seattle 11 -14-S 09:30:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -S 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 11 -14 -S 11:00:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -S 20:00:00 2 2 Seattle 11 -14 -S Total 817 7 824 Seattle 13-01 05:00:00 3 3 Seattle 13-01 05:30:00 11 1 12 Seattle 13-01 05:48:00 3 3 Seattle 13-01 06:00:00 27 27 Seattle 13-01 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 13-01 06:30:00 10 10 Seattle 13 -01 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 13-01 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13-01 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -01 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -01 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -01 14:00:00 5 21 26 Seattle 13 -01 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -01 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -01 22:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13-01 Total 68 23 2 93 Seattle 13-02 05:00:00 2 2 Seattle 13 -02 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -02 Total 3 3 Seattle 13 -03 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 .05:00:00 7 7 Seattle 13-03 05:30:00 12 12 Seattle 13-03 05:40:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 06:00:00 22 22 Seattle 13 -03 06:30:00 17 17 Seattle 13 -03 06:45:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 07:00:00 27 27 Seattle 13-03 07:05:00 1 . 1 Seattle 13-03 07:30:00 12 12 Seattle 13-03 08:00:00 7 7 Seattle 13-03 08:10:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 10:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -03 11:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 14:00:00 2 2 Seattle 13-03 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13-03 22:30:00 .1 1 Seattle 13-03 Total 118 4 1 123 Seattle 13-102 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 13 -102 Total 1 1 Seattle 13-103 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 13-103 Total 1 1 Seattle 14-01 00:00:00 2 2 Seattle 14-01 04:00:00 2 2 Seattle 14 -01 05:00:00 64 64 Seattle 14 -01 05:01:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 05:03:00 2 2 Seattle 14 -01 05:05:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 05:15:00 2 2 Seattle 14-01 05:30:00 49 49 Seattle 14 -01 05:40:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 14 -01 06:00:00 82 82 Seattle 14 -01 06:10:00 2 2 Seattle 14 -01 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 06:30:00 35 35 Seattle 14 -01 06:45:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 07:00:00 160 160 Seattle 14 -01 07:15:00 4 4 Seattle 14 -01 07:20:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 07:30:00 33 33 Seattle 14 -01 07:45:00 4 4 Seattle 14 -01 08:00:00 26 26 Seattle 14 -01 08:15:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 08:30:00 5 5 Seattle 14 -01 09:00:00 11 11 Seattle 14 -01 09:15:00 1 1 Seattle 14-01 09:30:00 2 2 Seattle 14-01 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 14:30:00 22 22 Seattle 14 -01 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle 14 -01 Total 495 24 519 Seattle 15 -01 05:00:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -01 05:15:00 1 1 Seattle 15-01 05:30:00 4 4 Seattle 15 -01 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -01 06:00:00 20 20 Seattle 15 -01 06:30:00 16 16 Seattle 15 -01 07:00:00 49 49 Seattle 15 -01 07:30:00 10 10 Seattle 15 -01 08:00:00 8 8 Seattle 15-01 08:15:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -01 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -01 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -01 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -01 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15-01 16:00:00 17 17 Seattle 15 -01 Total 115 20 135 Seattle 15-08 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15-08 Total 1 1 Seattle 15-10 05:30:00 3 3 Seattle 15 -10 06:00:00 3 3 Seattle 15-10 06:30:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -10 07:00:00 10 10 Seattle 15-10 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 15-10 07:30:00 7 7 Seattle 15-10 07:45:00 2 2 Seattle 15-10 08:00:00 6 6 Seattle 15-10 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15-10 Total 35 35 Seattle 15 -100 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15- 100 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15-100 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15- 100 06:30:00 3 3 Seattle 15 -100 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15-100 07:50:00 1. 1 Seattle. 15-100 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -100 Total 9 9 Seattle .15 -20 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 05:00:00 5 5 Seattle 15 -20 05:18:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 05:30:00 13 13 Seattle 15 -20 05:45:00 3 3 Seattle 15-20 06:00:00 33 33 Seattle 15-20 06:30:00 33 33 Seattle 15 -20 06:45:00 3 3 Seattle 15 -20 07:00:00 114 114 Seattle 15-20 07:05:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 07:18:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 07:30:00 34 34 Seattle 15 -20 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 15-20 08:00:00 20 20 Seattle . 15 -20 08:30:00 10 10 Seattle 15 -20 09:00:00 12 12 Seattle 15 -20 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 12:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 23:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -20 Total 287 1 1 • 289 Seattle 15 -30 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -30 04:40:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -30 05:00:00 14 14 Seattle 15 -30 05:20:00 1 1 Seattle 15 -30 05:30 :00 12 12 Seattle 15 -30 05:50:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -30 06:00:00 10 10 Seattle 15-30 06:30:00 8 8 Seattle 15-30 06:50:00 _ 1 1 Seattle 15 -30 07:00:00 9 9 Seattle 15-30 07:30:00 3 3 Seattle 15-30 08:00:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -30 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 15 -30 Total 67 67 Seattle 15-35 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 15-35 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -35 06:30:00 2 2 Seattle 15 -35 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 15-35 Total 7 7 Seattle 18-05 01:30:00 1 1 Seattle 18 -05 03:00:00 1 1 Seattle 18 -05 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 18 -05 Total 3 3 Seattle 18 -28 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 18-28 Total 1 1 Seattle 18-61 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 18-61 Total 1 1 Seattle 2 -09 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -09 22:00:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -09 Total 4 4 Seattle 2 -10 04:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -10 05:00:00 15 15 Seattle 2 -10 05:30:00 14 14 Seattle 2 -10 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 05:50:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -10 06:00:00 101 2 103 Seattle 2 -10 06:12:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -10 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 06:30:00 .5 5 Seattle 2 -10 07:00:00 12 12 Seattle 2 -10 08:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -10 08:12:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 13:30:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -10 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 14:18:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 14:30:00 1 34 35 Seattle 2 -10 14:42:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -10 15:00:00 5 5 Seattle 2 -10 17:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 22:55:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 23:00:00 17 17 Seattle 2 -10 23:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -10 Total 163 49 19 231 Seattle 2 -120 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -120 Total 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 00:00:00 3 1 4 Seattle 2 -122 01:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2- 122 04:00:00 5 5 Seattle 2- 122 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:00:00 34 34 Seattle 2 -122 05:15:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 05:24:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:30:00 35 35 Seattle 2 -122 05:35:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:54:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 05:55:00 1 1 Seattle 2- 122 06:00:00 134 134 Seattle 2 -122 06:05:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 06:12:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 06:15:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 06:30:00 85 1 86 Seattle 2 -122 06:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 06:45:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 07:00:00 258 258 Seattle 2 -122 07:15:00 5 5 Seattle 2 =122 07:30:00 87 87 Seattle 2 -122 07:45:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 08:00:00 62 62 Seattle 2 -122 08:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 08:30:00 16 16 Seattle 2 -122 09:00:00 11 11 Seattle 2 -122 09:30:00 10 10 Seattle 2 -122 10:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 10:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 12:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 13:00:00 1 1 2 Seattle 2 -122 14:00:00 1 7 8 Seattle 2 -122 14:30:00 1 7 8 Seattle 2 -122 14:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 15:00:00 2 5 7 Seattle 2 -122 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 20:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -122 22:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -122 23:00:00 7 7 Seattle 2 -122 Total 776 26 11 813 Seattle 2 -123 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -123 05:30:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -123 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -123 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -123 07:00:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -123 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -123 Total 11 11 Seattle 2 -15 03:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -15 04:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -15 05:00:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -15 05:24:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 05:30:00 7 7 Seattle 2 -15 05:45:00 5 5 Seattle 2 -15 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 05:50:00 5 5 Seattle . 2 -15 06:00:00 31 1 32 Seattle 2 -15 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 06:15:00 5 5 Seattle 2 -15 06:24:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 06:30:00 10 10 Seattle 2 -15 07:00:00 13 13 Seattle 2 -15 08:30:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -15 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 13:30:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -15 14:00:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -15 14:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 14:30:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -15 15:00:00 18 18 Seattle 2 -15 15:12:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 15:24:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 15:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -15 17:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 22:00:00 2 2 4 Seattle 2 -15 23:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 23:59:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -15 Total 96 42 4 142 Seattle 2 -22 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -22 Total 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 00:00:00 8 8 Seattle 2 -25 04:00:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -25 04:30:00 1 - 1 Seattle 2 -25 05:00:00 22 22 Seattle 2 -25 05:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 05:30:00 35 35 Seattle 2 -25 05:45:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -25 06:00:00 140 140 Seattle 2 -25 06:12:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -25 06:15:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -25 06:18:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 06:30:00 105 105 Seattle 2 -25 06:40:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 06:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 06:45:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -25 06:55:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 07:00:00 448 448 Seattle 2 -25 07:06:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 07:10:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 07:15:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -25 - 07:18:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 07:30:00. 149 149 Seattle 2 -25 07:40:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 07:45:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -25 08:00:00 122 122 Seattle 2 -25 08:20:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 08:30:00 46 46 Seattle 2 -25 09:00:00 22 22 Seattle 2 -25 09:15:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -25 09:30:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -25 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 10:30:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -25 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -25 20:30:00 -1 1 Seattle 2 -25 Total 1148 1 1 1150 Seattle 2 -30 05:00:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -30 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -30 '06:00:00 12 12 Seattle 2 -30 06:10:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -30 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -30 Total 20 20 Seattle 2 -31 00:00:00 2 1 ' 3 Seattle 2 -31 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -31 05:00:00 10 10 Seattle 2 -31 05:30:00 7 7 Seattle 2 -31 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -31 06:00:00 28 28 Seattle 2 -31 06:18:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -31 06:30:00 6 6 Seattle 2 -31 07:00:00 15 15 Seattle 2 -31 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -31 07:30:00 8 8 Seattle 2 -31 08:00:00 5 5 Seattle 2 -31 08:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -31 09:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -31 14:00:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -31 14:30:00 15 15 Seattle 2 -31 15:40:00 , 2. 2 Seattle 2 -31 16:00:00 1 22 23 Seattle 2 -31 23:00:00 20 20 Seattle 2 -31 Total 90 43 20 153 Seattle 2-40 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2-40 06:00:00 4 4 Seattle 2-40 Total 5 5 Seattle 2 -80 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2-80 Total 1 1 Seattle . 2 -81 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2-81 04:45:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 05:30:00 7 7 Seattle 2-81 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 2-81 06:00:00 24 24 Seattle 2-81 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 2-81 06:30:00 23 23 Seattle 2-81 06:45:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 07:00:00 56 56 Seattle 2 -81 07:30:00 28 28 Seattle 2 -81 07:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 08:00:00 9 9 Seattle 2 -81 08:10:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 08:30:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -81 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2-81 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -81 Total 161 1 162 Seattle 2 -83 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -83 Total 1 1 Seattle 2 -85 05:00:00 5 5 Seattle 2 -85 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -85 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 2-85 06:00:00 8 8 Seattle 2 -85 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -85 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -85 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -85 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -85 22:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2-85 Total 19 2 2 23 Seattle 2 -88 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 04:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -88 05:00:00 4 4 Seattle 2 -88 05:12:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 05:30:00 3 . 3 Seattle 2-88 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 2-88 . 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 2-88 06:00:00 29 29 Seattle 2-88 06:12:00 63 63 Seattle 2 -88 06:30:00 20 20 Seattle 2 -88 06:42:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88.. 07:00:00 41 41 Seattle 2-88 07:30:00 14 14 Seattle 2-88 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 2-88 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 2 -88 09:00:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -88 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 14:00:00 1 . 2 3 Seattle 2-88 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 14:42:00 1 34 35 Seattle 2 -88 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 2 -88 23:12:00 7 7 Seattle 2-88 23:30:00 2 2 Seattle 2 -88 Total 191 38 9 238 Seattle 22 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 22 Total 1 1 Seattle 22 -01 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 22-01 Total 1 1 Seattle 24-40 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 05:00:00 12 12 Seattle 24-40 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 06:00:00 48 48 Seattle 24-40. . 06:30:00 3 3 Seattle 24-40 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24-40 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-40 14:30:00 18 18 Seattle 24-40 22:30:00 . 1 1 2 Seattle 24-40 23:00:00 10 10 Seattle 24-40 23:30:00 2 2 Seattle 24-40 Total . 72 20 13 105 Seattle 24 -50 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 05:00:00 119 4 1 124 Seattle 24 -50 . 05:15:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 05:30:00 22 22 Seattle 24 -50 06:00:00 146 3 1 150 Seattle 24 -50 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 06:18:00 11 11 Seattle 24 -50 06:30:00 46 46 Seattle 24 -50 06:42:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 06:55:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 07:00:00 51 51 Seattle 24 -50 07:15:00 2 2 Seattle 24-50 07:30:00 7 7 Seattle 24 -50 08:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24 -50 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 24 -50 11:00:00 1 1 Seattle .24 -50 13:30:00 4 .4 Seattle 24 -50 14:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24 -50 14:30:00 4 74 1 79 Seattle 24-50 14:42:00. 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 14:48:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -50 '15:00:00 3 6 9 Seattle 24 -50 15:30:00 2 73 75 Seattle 24 -50 16:30:00 3 3 Seattle 24 -50 22:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24 -50. 23:00:00 . 1 45 46 Seattle 24 -50 Total 428 174 52 654 Seattle 24 -55 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24 -55 Total 1 1 Seattle 24-60 00:00:00 2 2 Seattle 24-60 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 04:50:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 05:00:00 23 1 24 Seattle 24-60 05:04:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 05:10:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 05:30:00 18 18 Seattle 24-60 . 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 06:00:00 61 2 63 Seattle 24-60 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 06:25:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 06:30:00 219 5 5. 229 Seattle 24-60 06:45:00 2 2 Seattle 24-60 07:00:00 32 2 34 Seattle 24-60 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 07:20:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 08:00:00 11 11 Seattle 24-60 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 11:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 13:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24-60 13:30:00 2 7 9 Seattle 24-60 14:00:00 .2 2 Seattle 24-60 14:30:00 1 16 17 Seattle 24-60 14:42:00 2 2 Seattle 24-60 15:00:00 4 161 165 Seattle 24-60 15:10:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 15:30:00 3 3 Seattle 24-60 16:00:00 4 4 Seattle 24-60 21:30:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 22:00:00 2 2 Seattle 24-60 22:30:00 5 5 Seattle 24-60 23:00:00 1 5 6 Seattle 24-60 23:30:00 2 149 151 Seattle 24-60 23:50:00 1 1 Seattle 24-60 Total 388 213 170 771 Seattle 25 -01 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 25-01 07:00:00 10 10 Seattle 25-01 07:30:00 2 2 Seattle 25-01 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 25-01 09:00:00 2 2 Seattle 25 -01 Total 17 17 Seattle 25 -20 06:42:00 1 1 Seattle 25 -20 07:00:00 3 3 Seattle 25 -20 Total •4 4 Seattle 271 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 271 Total 1 1 Seattle 28 07:00:00 2 2 Seattle 28 08:00:00 2 2 Seattle 28 Total 4 4 Seattle 3 -200X 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -200X Total 1 1 Seattle 3 -323 06:00:00 6 6 Seattle 3 -323 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -323 •07:00:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -323 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -323 14:20:00 1 1 Seattle . 3-323 14:30:00. 1 1 2 Seattle 3 -323 Total 11 3 14 Seattle 3 -324 05:00:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -324 05:30:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -324 05:42:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 06:00:00 20 20 Seattle 3 -324 06:12:00 3 3 Seattle. 3 -324 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 06:18:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 06:30:00 11 11 Seattle 3 -324 07:00:00 33 33 Seattle 3 -324 07:30:00 8 8 Seattle 3 -324 08:00:00 6 6 Seattle 3 -324 08:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -324 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -324 Total 94 1 95 Seattle 3 -326 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -326 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -326 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -326 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -326 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -326 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -326 Total 5 2 7 Seattle 3 -350 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -350 Total 2 2 Seattle 3 -353 05:00:00 4 4 Seattle 3 -353 05:12:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -353 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -353 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -353 Total 6 1 7 Seattle 3 -369 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 14:24:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -369 Total 4 2 6 Seattle 3 -380 05:00:00 4 ' 4 Seattle 3 -380 05:30:00 5 5 Seattle 3 -380 05:45:00 40 40 Seattle 3 -380 05:48:00 7 7 Seattle 3 -380 05:54:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -380 06:00:00 11 1 12 Seattle 3 -380 07:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -380 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -380 14:15:00 32 32 Seattle 3 -380 14:24:00 10 10 Seattle 3 -380 14:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -380 16:15:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -380 20:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -380 22:45:00 28 28 Seattle 3 -380 22:54:00 6 6 Seattle 3 -380 23:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -380 23:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -380 Total 74 46 37 157 Seattle 3 -390 03:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3- 390 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3- 390 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -390 05:00:00 14 2 16 Seattle 3 -390 05:18:00 29 1 30 Seattle 3 -390 05:30:00 37 37 Seattle 3 -390 05:45:00 7 7 Seattle 3 -390 05:48:00 " 7 7 Seattle 3 -390 05:55:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -390 06:00:00 185 5 3 193 Seattle 3- 390 06:18:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -390 06:24:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -390 06:30:00 8 8 Seattle 3 -390 07:00:00 84 2 86 Seattle 3 -390 07:30:00 2 1 3 Seattle 3 -390 08:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -390 08:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -390 12:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -390 13:30:00 4 4 Seattle 3 -390 13:48:00 10 10 Seattle 3 -390 14:00:00 5 22 27 Seattle 3 -390 14:18:00 10 1 11 Seattle 3 -390 14:24:00 1 2 3 Seattle 3 -390 14:30:00 1 96 1 98 Seattle 3 -390 14:42:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -390 15:00:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -390 15:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -390 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -390 22:18:00 1 3 4 Seattle 3 -390 22:30:00 1 1 2 Seattle 3 -390 23:00:00 4 1 6 11 Seattle 3 -390 Total 398 164 17 579 Seattle. 3-626 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -626 06:00:00 4 4 Seattle 3-626 06:30:00 17 17 Seattle 3-626 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-626 14:42:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -626 Total 23 1 24 Seattle 3 -800 00:00:00 26 26 Seattle 3 -800 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 04:30:00 3 1 4 Seattle 3 -800 05:00:00 9 9 Seattle 3 -800 05:18:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 05:30:00 11 11 Seattle 3 -800 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 05:48:00 7 7 Seattle 3 -800 05:50:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 05:54:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 05:55:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 06:00:00 127. 3 1 131 Seattle 3 -800 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 06:15:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 06:18:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 06:30:00 32 1 33 Seattle 3 -800 06:45:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -800 07:00:00 238 1 239 Seattle 3 -800 07:15:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 07:30:00 48 48 Seattle 3 -800 07:40:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3-800 08:00:00 11 '11 Seattle 3 -800 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -800 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 09:45:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 10:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3-800 12:00:00 1 2 3 Seattle 3-800 13:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 13:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3-800 14:00:00 4 4 Seattle 3-800 14:15:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 14:18:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 14:30:00 4 93 97 Seattle 3 -800 15:40:00 1 1 Seattle 3-800 16:00:00 8 8 Seattle 3 -800 21:30:00 1 1 2 Seattle 3 -800 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -800 22:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -800 23:00:00 37 37 Seattle 3-800 23:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3-800 Total 545 120 45 710 Seattle 3 -801 00:00:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -801 01:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3- 801 04:00:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -801 04:15:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3-801 05:00:00 6 6 Seattle 3 -801 05:10:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 05:30:00 5 5 Seattle 3 -801 05:35:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 05:45:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -801 06:00:00 17 17' Seattle 3-801 06:25:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 06:30:00 14 14 Seattle 3-801 06:40:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 06:54:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 07:00:00 54 54 Seattle 3 -801 07:30:00 15 15 Seattle 3-801 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 07:50:00 1 1 Seattle 3-801 08:00:00 6 6 Seattle 3 -801 08:15:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 08:30:00 4 4 Seattle 3 -801 09:00:00 5 5 Seattle 3 -801 09:30:00 3 3 Seattle 3 -801 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-801 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 14:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3-801 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-801 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -801 Total 149 5 1 155 Seattle 3 -818 02:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3-818 05:25:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 • 05:30:00 7 7 Seattle 3 -818 05:42:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 3-818 05:54:00 4 4 Seattle 3-818 06:00:00 33 33 Seattle 3 -818 06:30:00 2 2 Seattle 3 -818 07:00:00 8 8 Seattle • 3 -818 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 13:30:00 1 1 2 Seattle 3 -818 14:00:00 4 2 6 Seattle 3 -818 14:12:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 14:30:00 23 23 ' Seattle 3 -818 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 17:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -818 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-818 22:30:00 1 5 6 Seattle 3-818 23:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-818 Total 63 31 7 101 Seattle 3-822 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -822 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3-822 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -822 Total 2 1 3 Seattle 3-825 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -825 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3- 825 06:00:00 6 6 Seattle 3-825 06:30:00 4 4 Seattle 3 -825 07:00:00 5 5 Seattle 3 -825 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -825 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -825 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -825 22:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -825 Total 19 1 1 21 Seattle 3 -834 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3-834 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -834 06:00:00 3 1 4 Seattle 3 -834 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -834 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -834 Total 7 1 8 Seattle 3 -840 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -840 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -840 06:00:00 22 22 Seattle 3 -840 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -840 07:00:00 16 16 Seattle 3-840 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 3 -840 Total 42 - 42 Seattle 304 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 304 Total 1 1 Seattle 379 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 379 Total _ 1 1 Seattle 4 -013L 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4-013L Total 1 1 Seattle 4 -056G 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 4 -056G 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 4 -056G Total 2 1 3 Seattle 4-140H 05:30:00 3 3 Seattle 4-140H 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4 -140H 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4 -140H Total 4 1 5 Seattle 4 -17 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4 -17 Total 1 1 Seattle 4-81 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4 -81 22:45:00 1 1 Seattle 4-81 Total 1 1 2 Seattle 4-82 23:00:00 1 1 Seattle 4-82 Total 1 1 Seattle 40-11 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 40 -11 Total 1 1 Seattle 40-22 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 40-22 06:00:00. 1 1 Seattle 40-22 Total 2 2 Seattle 40 -24 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 40 -24 Total 2 2 Seattle 40 -34 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 40-34 Total 1 1 Seattle 40-83 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 40-83 Total 1 1 Seattle 40-84 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 40-84 Total 1 1 Seattle 40-87 06:30:00 2 2 Seattle 40-87 07:00:00 2 2 Seattle 40-87 Total 4 4 Seattle 40-88 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 40-88 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 40-88 Total 2 2 Seattle 45-80 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 45-80 Total 1 1 Seattle 47 -155 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 47 -155 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 47 -155 Total 2 2 Seattle 48 -112 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 48 -112 Total 1 1 Seattle 48 -18 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 48 -18 Total 1 1 Seattle 5 -08 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 5-08 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 5 -08 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 5 -08 Total 3 3 Seattle 52 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 52 Total 1 1 Seattle 54 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 54 Total 1 1 Seattle 7 -172 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -172 Total 1 1 Seattle 7 -181 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -181 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -181 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -181 Total 3 3 Seattle 7 -206 05:30:00 2 2 Seattle 7 -206 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -206 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -206 Total 4 4 Seattle 7 -27 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -27 23:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -27 Total 1 1 2 Seattle 7 -33 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -33 05:30:00 4 4 Seattle 7 -33 06:00:00 5 5 Seattle 7 -33 06:30:00 5 5 Seattle 7 -33 07:00:00 43 43 Seattle 7 -33 07:15:00 4 4 Seattle 7 -33 07:30:00 24 24 Seattle 7 -33 07:45:00 2 2 Seattle 7 -33 08:00:00 8 8 Seattle 7 -33 08:30:00 4 4 Seattle 7 -33 09:00:00 2 2 Seattle 7 -33 11:59:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -33 Total 103 103 Seattle 7-48 -2 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7-48 -2 Total 1 1 Seattle 7 -52 00:00:00 3 3 Seattle 7 -52 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -52 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7 -52 06:30:00 3 3 Seattle 7 -52 07:00:00 16 16 Seattle 7 -52 07:30:00 7 7 Seattle 7 -52 08:00:00 3 3 Seattle 7 -52 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 7 -52 Total 37 37 Seattle 7-68 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 7-68 06:00:00 6 6 Seattle 7-68 06:30:00 3 3 Seattle 7-68 07:00:00 10 10 Seattle 7-68 07:30:00 6 6 Seattle 7-68 08:00:00 2 2 Seattle 7-68 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 7-68 Total 28 Seattle 7 -73 06:00:00 1 Seattle 7 -73 06:30:00 4 Seattle 7 -73 07:00:00 5 Seattle 7 -73 07:30:00 4 Seattle 7 -73 07:45:00 1 Seattle 7 -73 08:00:00 3 Seattle 7 -73 08:30:00 3 Seattle 7 -73 08:45:00 1 Seattle 7 -73 Total 22 Seattle 75 07:00:00 1 Seattle 75 Total 1 Seattle 80 07:00:00 1 Seattle 80 Total 1 Seattle 800 07:00:00 1 Seattle 800 Total 1 Seattle 85 -001 06:30:00 1 Seattle 85 -001 Total - 1 Seattle 89 00:00:00 1 Seattle 89 . 07:00:00 4 Seattle 89 Total 5 Seattle 9 -05 14:00:00 Seattle 9 -05 22:00:00 Seattle 9 -05 Total Seattle 9 -08 00:00:00 3 Seattle 9 -08 04:00:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 04:30:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 04:45:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 05:00:00 30 Seattle 9 -08 05:10:00 . 1 Seattle 9 -08 05:30:00 12 Seattle 9-08 05:45:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 05:50:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:00:00 92 Seattle . 9-08 06:12:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:15:00 6 Seattle 9 -08 06:17:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:18:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:20:00 1 Seattle 9-08 06:24:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:25:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 06:30:00 85 Seattle 9 -08 06:45:00 7 Seattle 9 -08 06:50:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 07:00:00 220 Seattle 9 -08 07:15:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 07:25:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 07:30:00 86 Seattle 9 -08 07:45:00 2 Seattle 9 -08 08:00:00 48 Seattle 9 -08 08:20:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 08:30:00 20 Seattle 9 -08 08:35:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 08:45:00 2 Seattle 9 -08 09:00:00 14 Seattle 9 -08 09:30:00 3 Seattle 9 -08 09:45:00 2 Seattle 9 -08 10:00:00 1 Seattle 9 -08 10:15:00 1 1 1 29 1 4 5 4 1 3 3 1 22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 30 1 12 1 1 92 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 85 7 1 220 1 1 86 2 48 1 20 1 2 14 3 2 1 1 Seattle 9 -08 10:30:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -08 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -08 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -08 Total 655 1 656 Seattle 9 -101 00:00:00 8 8 Seattle 9 -101 02:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 03:30:00 1 3 4 Seattle 9 -101 03:48:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 04:00:00 15 15 Seattle 9 -101 04:20:00 1 1 Seattle 9- 101 04:30:00 22 22 Seattle 9 -101 04:45:00 1 1 Seattle 9- 101 04:50:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -101 05:00:00 165 2 167 Seattle 9 -101 05:15:00 7 7 Seattle 9 -101 05:18:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 05:20:00 1 1 Seattle 9 =101 05:25:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -101 05:30:00 394 19 1 414 Seattle 9 -101 05:40:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -101 05:42:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 05:45:00 13 13 Seattle 9 -101 05:48:00 8 8 Seattle 9 -101 05:50:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 05:55:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 06:00:00 336 336 Seattle 9 -101 06:05:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 06:12:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -101 06:15:00 9 9 Seattle 9 -101 06:18:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -101 06:20:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -101 06:25:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 06:30:00 192 192 Seattle 9 -101 06:35:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 06:40:00 3 3 Seattle 9- 101 06:45:00 12 12 Seattle 9 -101 06:50:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 07:00:00 323 323 Seattle 9 -101 .07:15:00 8 8 Seattle 9 -101 07:18:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 07:20:00 6 6 Seattle 9 -101 07:30:00 101 101 Seattle 9 -101 07:45:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -101 07:55:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 08:00:00 50 50 Seattle 9 -101 08:15:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -101 08:20:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 08:30:00 18 18 Seattle 9-101 09:00:00 15 15 Seattle 9 -101 09:30:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -101 10:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -101 10:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -101 11:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 12:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 13:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 13:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -101 14:00:00 9 80 1 90 Seattle 9 -101 14:18:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 14:30:00 4 14 18 Seattle 9 -101 14:42:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 16:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -101 20:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -101 22:00:00 1 1 2 Seattle 9 -101 22:30:00 1 3 39 43 Seattle 9 -101 23:00:00 2 6 8 Seattle 9 -101 Total 1776 129 53 1958 Seattle 9 -110 05:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -110 06:00:00 8 8 Seattle 9 -110 06:18:00 1 1 Seattle 9-110 _ 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -110 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -110 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -110 20:00:00 - 1 1 Seattle 9 -110 Total 19 1 20 Seattle 9 -120 05:30:00 12 12 Seattle 9 -120 05:48:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -120 06:00:00 19 19 Seattle 9 -120 06:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -120 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -120 07:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -120 08:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -120 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -120 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -120 10:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -120 15:00:00 1 1 2 Seattle 9 -120 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -120 Total 50 2 52 Seattle 9 -130 05:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -130 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -130 06:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -130 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -130 Total 7 7 Seattle 9 -140 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -140 05:30:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -140 05:55:00 -1 1 Seattle 9 -140 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -140 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -140 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -140 Total 8 8 Seattle 9 -150 00:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -150 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -150 07:00:00 1 1 _ Seattle 9 -150 07:30:00 1 - 1 Seattle 9 -150 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -150 11:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -150 11:30:00 1 1 - Seattle 9 -150 Total 7 7 Seattle 9-42 00:00:00 2 2 1 5 Seattle 9-42 02:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-42 06:00:00 14 1 15 Seattle 9-42 07:00:00 8 1 9 Seattle 9-42 14:00:00 17 17 Seattle 9-42. 22:00:00 20 20 Seattle 9-42 Total 24 21 22 67 Seattle 9-48 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-48 Total 1 1 Seattle 9 -50 05:00:00 6 6 Seattle 9 -50 . 05:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -50 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -50 06:00:00 19 19 Seattle 9 -50 06:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -50 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -50 07:12:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -50 07:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -50 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -50 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -50 22:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -50 Total 45 1 46 Seattle 9 -51 04:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -51 05:00:00 13 13 Seattle 9 -51 05:30:00 19 19 Seattle 9 -51 05:40:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -51 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -51 05:48:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -51 06:00:00 83 83 Seattle 9 -51 06:12:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 06:15:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 06:24:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 06:30:00 24 24 Seattle 9 -51 07:00:00 41 41 Seattle 9 -51 07:15:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 07:30:00 7 7 Seattle 9 -51 07:40:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 08:00:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -51 08:30:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -51 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 14:00:00 10 10 Seattle 9 -51 14:30:00 15 15 Seattle 9 -51 14:42:00 1 1 Seattle . 9 -51 15:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 15:30:00 1 1 Seattle . 9 -51 15:40:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -51 16:00:00 31 31 Seattle 9 -51 16:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -51 22:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -51 22:30:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -51 23:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -51 Total 208 65 8 281 Seattle 9 -52 05:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -52 Total 3 3 Seattle 9-53 04:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 04:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 05:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -53 05:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -53 05:40:00 2 2 Seattle . 9 -53 05:45:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 06:00:00 26 26 Seattle 9 -53 06:30:00 . 14 14 Seattle 9 -53 07:00:00 34 34 Seattle 9 -53 07:30:00 8 8 Seattle 9 -53 08:00:00 7 7 Seattle 9 -53 08:25:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 08:30:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -53 08:45:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 09:00:00 7 7 Seattle 9 -53 09:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 09:45 :00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 10:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -53 11:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-53 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-53 13:42:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 14:00:00 2 6 8 Seattle 9 -53 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -53 Total 122 8 130 Seattle 9-55 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-55 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9-55 07:30:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -55 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -55 08:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-55 Total 12 12 Seattle 9 -57 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -57 05:45:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -57 06:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9-57 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -57 Total 7 7 Seattle 9-59 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-59 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -59 Total 2 2 Seattle 9-60 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-60 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-60 Total 2 2 Seattle 9-61 05:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-61 05:45:00 3 3 Seattle 9-61 06:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9-61 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle - 9-61 13:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-61 14:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-61 22:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-61 Total 7 2 1 10 Seattle 9-67 05:50:00 4 4 Seattle 9-67 Total 4 4 Seattle 9-77 06:00:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -77 07:00:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -77 07:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9-77 08:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -77 Total 10 10 Seattle 9-80 06:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9-80 Total 1 1 Seattle 9-90 05:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9-90 06:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9-90 06:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -90 07:00:00 7 7 Seattle 9 -90 08:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -90 Total 16 16 Seattle 9 -96 00:00:00 5 5 Seattle 9 -96 04:00:00 6 6 Seattle 9-96 04:15:00 1 1 Seattle 9-96 04:30:00. 2 2 Seattle 9-96 04:45:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -96 05:00:00 25 25 Seattle 9-96 05:30:00 31 31 Seattle 9 -96 05:45:00 5 5 Seattle 9-96 06:00:00 105 105 Seattle 9-96 06:10:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -96 06:15:00 8 Seattle 9 -96 06:25:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 06:30:00 104 Seattle 9 -96 06:40:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 06:42:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 06:45:00 4 Seattle 9 -96 06:50:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 07:00:00 268 Seattle 9 -96 07:15:00 3 Seattle 9 -96 07:30:00 104 Seattle 9 -96 07:40:00 1 Seattle 9-96 07:45:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 07:50:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 08:00:00 70 Seattle 9 -96 08:10:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 08:15:00 2 Seattle 9 -96 08:30:00 16 Seattle 9 -96 09:00:00 9 Seattle 9 -96 09:15:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 09:30:00 3 Seattle 9-96 10:00:00 3 Seattle 9 -96 11:00:00 1 Seattle 9 -96 15:00:00 Seattle 9-96 Total 787 Seattle 9 -98 00:00:00 3 Seattle 9 -98 04:30:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 05:00:00 14 Seattle 9 -98 05:15:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 05:30:00 17 Seattle 9-98 05:40:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 05:45:00 2 Seattle 9-98 05:50:00 1 Seattle 9-98 06:00:00 46 Seattle 9-98 06:18:00 1 Seattle 9-98 06:30:00 44 Seattle 9-98 06:40:00 1 , Seattle 9 -98 06:45:00 2 Seattle 9 -98 06:50:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 07:00:00 130 Seattle 9 -98 07:05:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 07:30:00 61 Seattle 9-98 07:42:00 1 Seattle 9-98 07:45:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 07:48:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 07:50:00 1 Seattle 9-98 08:00:00 59 Seattle 9 -98 08:05:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 08:06:00 1 Seattle 9-98 08:15:00 2 Seattle 9-98 08:30:00 14 Seattle 9-98 08:35:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 08:45:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 09:00:00 12 Seattle 9 -98 09:30:00 6 Seattle 9 -98 12:00:00 1 Seattle 9 -98 Total 429 Seattle 9-99 00:00:00 1 Seattle 9-99 05:00:00 2 Seattle 9 -99 05:30:00 2 1 1 8 1 104 1. 1 4 1 268 3 104 1 1 1 70 1 2 16 9 1 3 3 1 1 788 3 1 14 1 17 1 2 1 46 1 44 1 2 1 130 1 61 1 1 1 1 59 1 1 2 14 1 1 12 6 1 429 1 2 2 Seattle 9 -99 06:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -99 06:30:00 6 6 Seattle 9 -99 07:00:00 4 4 Seattle 9 -99 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -99 07:45:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -99 08:00:00 3 3 Seattle 9 -99 08:30:00 2 2 Seattle 9 -99 09:00:00 1 1 Seattle 9 -99 Total 27 27 Seattle 91 -14 07:00:00 2 2 Seattle 91 -14 Total 2 2 Seattle 91 -51 07:00:00 1 1 Seattle 91 -51 Total 1 1 Seattle 99-752 14:00:00 1 1 Seattle 99-752 Total 1 1 Seattle 99 -928 07:30:00 1 1 Seattle 99 -928 Total 1 1 Seattle N 16:00:00 1 1 Seattle N Total 1 1 Seattle Total Total 12963 1346 540 14849 Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way Lane - ;Group, » R Lane Configurations Total Lost. Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt. Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) - Total "Split(s)' Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s). Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio • v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 1 4' E B_FANN B11 NBT .:,SBTi= SBR . r 'i ++ n 4.0 "40. 4.0 40,;..:40;'. 40,: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.850' ,: 0:997 0.950 . 0.950 1570. 1404, 1612 3223 3494 0.950 0.111 1570 ;:1404, . _ 1,88 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 35 148 115 0.61 :: 0.61 0.95 15% 15% 12% 57 243.. 121. 57 243 121 Perm ;Perm 4` - 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0. ` 40 :0 ' '40.0. 40.0 - -0:0> 33.3% 33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 16.0 16:0 36.0 36.0 36.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0:5 3223 3494'' 7 1.00 1.00 1:00.: 480 1899 ''45 0.95 0.93 0:93: 12% 3% 505 2042. 505 2090 6 3% 4&.; 0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11..0 11.0. 11..0 11.0 11.0 0 . 0 0 0 0 16.0 16.0 .. 36.0 36.0 36.0 0.27 0.27 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.14 '0:64 '1.07 '0.26 1..00 17.9 27.8 128.8 6.1 19.5 0.0 0.0.` 0.0 0.0 '4.0 17.9 27.8 128.8 6.1 23.5 B ,C .. F A C 25.9 29.8 23.5 Inter'sectionfSummaryr . Ali Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6`SBT,: =Start of..Green:. Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal:Deiay:,25.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS:C ICU Level of Service D Synchro 6 Report Page 1 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way Splits and Phases: 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Wa 1 02 04 Z.,Sv ? srs5 1t. t. 0 4 y. , ,.. )'4i^g 1 33 .i; r.AC I O..S. ,. e.'::1'. . 3. 1 1 06 Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 32: Boeing Access Off NB Airport Way S & Airport Way 1 !B�.,`•3WB,R; �_NBT ; TNBR;t ;,'SBL° :�SBT�'r "� ;- �; Lane Configurations Lane Util. factor. Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1508 3312 0 0 3406 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 °.00.: Volume (vph) 0 195 272 0 0 1034 Peak Hour Factor 0:90 0.90 0.90 .. 0.90. 0.95 0;95, Heavy Vehicles ( %) 9% 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% Adj. Flow (vph): 0: • 217 '. 302 0 .. 0 1088:; Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 217 302 0 0 1088 Sign Control Yield Free Free r ++ . tt:. 1.00 1`.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0:95. 0.865 1508 3312 0 0 3406 Intersection Summa : '".3,". Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.9% Analysis Period (min) :15. ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 3 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 37: Airport Way S Off WB Boeing Access & Airport Way Lane Configurations Lane:.Uti1:- Factor Frt Flt :: ::r Satd. Flow (prot) FItPermittetl;= Satd. Flow (perm) Headway (Factor:-. Volume (vph) Peak, Hour= Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Add ;FIow2(vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) SignsCOntrol= tf + r 11:00 1;:00 1 00 ' 0 95 " 1, 00- 1.00., 0.850 1. 0'.25 0% 0 0 Free ntersectionaSummaryl Control Type: Unsignallzed,. Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.0% Analysis Periodt(min).15 0 3312 1792 1524 0 3312 1792 1524 0 0 272 602 432 "25f t', 0.90: ; 0.90 '0.95 0.95 0% 9% 9% 6% 6% 0 302 .634. 455 302 634 455 'Free.:. :''Free ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 4 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 43: Boeing Access Rd. & Airport Wa S Off WB Boeing Access Lane:Group; :{ , `EBC Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor .1.00 . Frt Flt Protected..; Satd. Flow (prot) 0 35.39 3312 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3539 3312 0 0 1550 Headway Factor 1.00 .1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Volume (vph) 0 1166 841 0 0 432 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90. 0.90': .0.95' > '.0.95'; Heavy Vehicles ( %) 2% 2% 9% 9% 6% 6% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1296 0.. ; 934 0 . 0 " 455 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1296 934 0 0 455 Sign Control Free Free Free EBTx79NBT, WBR; ~'SBL ; '8- 01:C3717: +lh . Iv. 0.95 ''0;86. 1.00 1.00 1.00.' 0.865 1550 Control Type:. Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service D Synchro 6 Report Page 5 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 54: Boeing Access Rd. & Boeing Access Off NB Airport Way S LaneLane Groupl.. 4- k 4/ BBL.- BBTaANBT , BR' =.' >:SBL' 1• Lane Configurations Lane Util: <Factor Frt Flt'Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flf;Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Headway Facto Volume (vph) Peak-- Hour=Factor =;; Heavy Vehicles ( %) . Lane Group Flow (vph) Sigsrr�Gorifrol;_ {,_, ... jnters,.ection„Summary, Tt? ++ r 00 : 0 91 0.95 r ,1.00 :' .1;.00 .1.00 • 0.85.0 0 5085 3312 1482 0 5085 3312 1482 0 0 1::00 100 ,11100 -:'100:;'1`.00 •1 :.00. 0 1768 841 195 0 0 0.90' 0,15- 0.25 2% 2% 9% 9% 0% 0% 0 t 1964 `...934 ";`217 "_ 0 0 0 1964 934 217 0 0 C`oritroLType: nsignalized ? . Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.5% Analysis" Period.:(min)_ 15 ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 6 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 62: Boeing Access Rd. & Airport Way S Off EB Boeing Access 4- 4 / Lane Group':. ,.. •EBT : ;EBR :j1NBL; `WBT, :.. NBL` NBR "; Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor. Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 0 3312 0 1550 Headway Factor 1.00 1`:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 1166 0 0 841 0 602 Peak Hour:. Factor 0`90 ' 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 ,. Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 9% 9% 6% 6% Adj. Flow (vph) 1296 0 0 934 0 ;634, :. Lane Group Flow (vph) 1296 0 0 934 0 634 Sign Control • Free Free Free t+ rr 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.865 0 3312 0 1550 Intersection :Summaryry;. ^::: Control Type: Unsignalized Capacity Utilization 76.2% Analysis - Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service D Synchro 6 Report Page 7 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 64: Boeing Access Rd. & Boeing Access EB Off NB Airport Way S C 4— 4 r kane,GroU ,k 'EBTTEBR.7WBL 7WB1- ` NWL Lane Configurations One Util: Factor Frt 0.850 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 0 5996 0 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 0 Headway, Factor 1.00- 1:00 Volume (vph) 1166 272 • 0 Peak Hour Factor 0:90 0.90: 0.90. Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 9% 9% Add .Flow (vph) . 1296' < 302' 0 1414 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1296 302 0 1414 0 Sign Control- . Free Free Free n,tersection" :812 inik 's r 1111 0:95 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1:00` 5996 1.00 1273 0.90 0 0 1,00 1.00 0 0 0:92 0.92 2% 2% 0: Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.6% Analysis' Period (min) 15' ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 73: Airport Way S Off EB Boeing Access & Boeing Access EB Off NB Airport Way S Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) ;EBT,T2,,VVE3L. 1.00 1..00] - 1.00 1.00 1.00 .100: 0.865 0 0 0 1792 0 1508 . - 0 0 0 1792 0 1508 1.00 1.00 1 00 - 1.00 1.00 • 0 0 0 602 0 - 272 0.25 0.25, ; 0.95. 0.95 0.90 0% 0% 6% 6% 9% 6.). Adj. Flow-(vph) • - 0 0 0 634 0 302 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 634 0 302 Sign Control Free Free Free I te Control Type: Unsignalized.,. ' - • • ' : ' Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 ; • Synchro 6 Report Page 9 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S Lane.Group EBT '<EBR:.7.WBL ".WBT ; Lane Configurations Total: Lost.:Time (s);: Lane Util. Factor Fit Flt Protected Satd Flow:(pr9ot) : Flt Permitted SatdaFlow'(perm).: Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) peak • Hour: Factor;, Heavy Vehicles (%) Add >rFlow'(:vph) _` P Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn .Type. Protected Phases Permitted;; Phases Minimum Split (s) Total "Split.(s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green;•(s) Yellow Time (s) All..: Red; T:ime�(s) ; ,• Lead /Lag Lead- LagOptimize? Walk Time (s) Flash .Dont Walk, (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) ActEffcttGreen (s) .16:0 40 '40 40-..40..:.'4.0: 4:0:. 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 1.00 0:972,: ;0:850; 0.850. 0.992 0.950 „3141 1 1374E _0:: '4900 4802 1524 0.689 0.950 3404 4802 ` 1524 • 78 712 77 '1:00 :' ',too; 1.0c 1.00. ' 1:00 ' 1.00' 746 841 179 892 465 88 0:01_ ' 0.94 ,o,!1:, : 0 :91. 0:88, .0.88, 7% 7% 5% 5% 6% 6% 794:` 895' ..::197- 1980 '528 100-- 977 712 0 1177 528 100 Perm `.Perm , =Perm 2 .-4' 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 "20 0 20 0 ' 20 0 20.0 20.0 r 20:•0 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16 :0' .16:0'.;: 1:6.0 3.5. 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0 5 :0 5 :'0 5.: 0.5,. 0.5 0.5 5.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 y /c;Ratio 0 :76' .' Control Delay 14.3 Queue: Delay 0 0 Total Delay 14.3 LOS B` Approach Delay 11.2 Approach' LOS', iitersecf_tonESummary Cycle' Length 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset 0 (0 %) Referencedrto phase:2' :NBL and ..6 :;;Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control: Type Pretimed,. Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection; Signal• Delay. :. X1:3:7': Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3% AnalysisPeriod- =(min) 15 • 5.0 5.0 5.0 . 5.0 5.0 ,11:0- 11.0 • .1r1.0 : 11.0,.... 0 0 0 0 0 1;6 0 '16.0' "16:0'.: 16:0; 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0 73' 1.09d1• 'O :27 0,15 7.0 20.5 8.6 4.1 :.0.0 '0.0': .0.0 7.0 20.5 8.6 4.1 :A. C z..A A. 20.5 7.9 C A ntersection: LOS:. B ICU Level of Service C Synchro 6 Report Page 10 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way. S & 16th Ave S dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. Splits and Phases: 80: E. Marginal Way 'S & 16th. Ave S 02 04 20- >Y: s._v. `s ,s = 'l: ;t..ik . --, . .. X+.�4 ; i3 '' :I C; ?:F w«:` t I. s,;4 . ,"...�- .- . a.- 20 a4;k Ai •y r > .ni f -_x ;;; L�'i:i C �da`:4.: KY :+y ; .. I +C _'"1" 00 '2020 ".X'i r �$ 4. S .. : V .. .Ei += i'Y7l', ".i :. > a �3`r';E?�'vA:� .... .. v" e. } *.iv I `b "c. ..ib`..:' Synchro 6 Report Page 11 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S .."4• Lane7Group''; ,_ _. ;EBL` ::''EBT;>.:;EBR t ?WB,L WBT, ;A/BR ;; KNBLa;;NBT= NBR: °,'• ;SBL:r`" SBTT:.TSBR Lane Configurations 41+ 4t - 4, 4+ TotatLost Time (s):; 4:0' 4:0. 4:0 4`0 '4:0 410 -4.0 :4:0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor . 0.9.5 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 2, :. 0.923 0.91.0 Flt Protected 0.995 0.995 Satd: Flow (prot) A' :3487.. 0 0 '3173 0 0 1670 0 0 1900 0 Flt Permitted 0.826 0.983 Satd: Flow (perm). 0. 2895 0 0 3173 0 0 1650 0 0 1900 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 340 99 Headway' Factor , 1:00 1;.00; 1.00. '1.00 1:00: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 76 625 0 0 283 299 11 28 77 0 0 0 Peak yHou'r'Factor , =`.0:88. 0.88' 1.0 88 ;::.0;88 0 :88 ` 0:88 0:78 0:78 0.78' 0.25 0.25 0.25 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% Atl a Flow v h _, b:-.'.; . 0 =< 322 340 . 14 : 1 (P) 86..::710 36 99 0.: 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 796 0 0 662 0 0 149' 0 0 0 0 Turn7ype.. :. :;:i';1.,;.:: :Perm , : _ - ;Perm:. .: Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted; Phases 4 . `8. • 2 6 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s)• 20.0, 20 0;•'. ` 0 0' .120.0 20.0 0.0 .' 20.0 20:0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 5.0.0% 50.0 %. 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% Maximum .Green` (s) '',,"16...0;;'' , 1.6:0: ':16'.0: 1`6'.0 - > ' 16:0. 16:0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All Red Time (s} , -0 5 ,0:5 0.5. ;0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lead /Lag Lead: Lag1Optimiz a ?: ;'; Walk T ime (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk;(s). ! "11: ;0 . 111 "0 =11:0 11;0 ' Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 ActEffct'Green (s)s 1.,6:0i- '1p6 0 • Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.69; 0:45, Control Delay 13.7 5.2 Queue Delay-, • '9,0 0:0 , Total Delay. 13.7 5.2 LOS B A Approach Delay 13.7 5.2 Approach LOS - A Trip erse OT Su mm ary L : r ' &b, Cycle Length: 40.- Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset 0(0 %),.Referenced=to: phase,: 2•:NBTL andi6 SBTL :Start o f:Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control `Type; Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection' Signal: Delay...:9.4:t . Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% Analysis' Period; (min):15 ; 5.0 5.0 11;0 .11.0 0 0 16.0 0.40 0.21 4.5 0:0 4.5 A 4.5 A 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 .• iL'^1•.d �':ihiH :.fs ?'L sa :a l�•L:, v t �"'t$•!F.. is rtY >': U4- Intersection LOS: A ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S Splits and Phases: 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S 02 4. -"01' o4 .' ' ' 0E iY 08 Synchro 6 Report Page 13 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 157: S Norfolk St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way t 4, MEZDFC:iiirp....:7.Z.4:‘,/,,,,:z.„,;1,...;*.EBleqEB.R.,..., NB BiTf,ir;S.B:1-0; • Lane Configurations 4+ +T. Lane UtiI Factor 1 00 1 00 0.95 .. 0:95 :0.95 0.95 r' Frt 0.877 0.999 Flt Protected . 0:996 : 0 996 Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 0 0 3392 3402 0 Flt. Permitted ; 0 996 0:996 Satd. Flow (perm) 1551 0 0 3392 . 3402 0 1.1eadwaiFactor 1 00 1 00 1:00 1.00'. 1 00 1.00 Volume (vph) 14 145 57 735 707 5 Pealc,171our`Factor;• 0.89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% , ;20 210 61,:: '1817 794 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 230 0 0 880 800 0 Sign Control • Stop • ; 'Free Free :•••••: )13.tersection..Siknmary , „AA': COnti6117Yrie;.Uhtignalized:: Intersection Capacity Utilization 61 Analysis Period (min) 15 ••• • • '4,41.29.411," 11,514— Ara, „4-av„ ICU Level of Service B • • Synchro 6 Report Page 14 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way Lane'.Group:z; Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot). Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor 1:00 Volume (vph) 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) • Total Split (%). Maximum :Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red. Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach. LOS -' '- 4. 4\ t �► l 4/ (3R-7.4..M191, .• WBT:_ WBR.; ,; NB NBT;;',NBR;: 4 + 1 1 4 r 1 1 + + � ft+ 4 :0 4.0 " 40 40.` 40;. 40. ` 40': 4 :0, 40;,: 40: . 4.0 4 :0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0:959 0.850'' 0.p62,, 0.997 0.950 0.984 0.950 0.950 0 1764 ; - Or .1649 ,...17.08;.:' 1553' 1 770: ' 3405 0 1736 -34/1 0.983 0.767 0.881 0.438 0.297 0 1:739= .,` 0 1331 * 1529 1553 -;816. .'..3405, :: 0' 543.,E 34712 47 30 139 1 • 3% 10 0 154 0 Perm 1'.00`: 83 0.86 1.00' 40 0.86: 3% 3% '97 .47 4 20.0 20 :0 50.0% 16.0 3.5 0.5 Intersection Sara , m Cycle Length: 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and6:SBTL; Start of Green' Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 5.0 1.1.0 0 4 20.0 20.0' 50.0% 16:0 3.5 0.5'. 1.00 1;00 ' .1:00- 134 81 25 Q.83 :.0 83 4% 4% 4% 1':00" 47 547 185 0.96)i ..0:96 0 :96 ::: 2% 2% 2% 161. ` ,: 98 30 49 '' '57:0' 112 147 30 49 763 Perm • Perm Perm 8 2 6 8 8 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0...20 :0. 20.0 20.0 ... 20 0 -.20.0 0:0 20:0'; 20:0:. 0:0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 160,: 16:0 , 160'.,16.0'" 160' ,: 16'0, , 1.6'0_ 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 ` .':0 :5.. .,0.5 05 06. :00;.; 97 00'. 1.00 101 521 1 0 97. 0,97-;:. 0:97 4% 4% 4% 193`:...104 537 1 0 104 538 0 Perm 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0' 11.0' 1 1.0 11:0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:0 _16.0. "16.0 16.0° 16.0' 16101 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.21: 0 :21. Q:24 ..0 05 : 0.15 0153. 6.8 9.2 9.3 3.9 9.2 8.9 0 :0 0 :0 . :0.0' 0.0 : 0:0 :0 :0 6.8 9.2 9.3 3.9 9.2 8.9 A A A A:` A::. A 6.8 8.7 9.0 A .q Intersection LOS: A ICU Level of Service A 5.0 5.0 11,0 '11: :0 0 0 16 :0 1;6 :0 0.40 0.40 0 48:" 0:395 18.8 9.5 0 0 - ",0;0, 18.8 9.5 11.0 B... Synchro 6 Report Page 15 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way Splits and Phases: 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way ' m2 t °"► 04 2 ilF6kI q{7+. LOS.S��rdl.`3�ti/ .' ]99:� .c �i�'v,.'��p��.1�s, /. #�ja % '�k- °�i "�i 6'�f'Li@�' 1^ .n ..`ti. �O�+�'a' ay ei..xiM: �'j, :. ' • ai . : ±`8N S5 ��1': . Y �. w' L''i`r , 4 gib .:irs I �; .: m6 08 20 el'. !! AW..1:11f. ;t: p . ,.bFl f '''.:41°,,,q41',..7 M ... i ;E2OTFx y i .x . :' ; Tc.'lfi ik. .. , if ..l }SNP.. t•). 1 Synchro 6 Report Page 16 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 167: S Hardy St & Airport Way S 4\ t 1 d Lane;.Group „u :EB11 ,FBR'r: >_ NBLr ,. -NBT: SBT. ;:,SBR; Lane Configurations Y. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.886 0.992 Flt Protected:';::`.'. 0.992 0.994 Satd. Flow (prot) 1606 0 0 3233 3411 Fit Permitted 0:992 0.994 Satd. Flow (perm) 1606 0 0 3233 3411 Headway Factor_ 1.00 ' 1.00 : 1.00 1.00 too,„; 1: , Volume (vph) 9 49 55 393 827 45 Peak. Hour Factor 0.65 0.65:" 0.81 0.81 0.83. 0:83`.;-., . Heavy Vehicles ( %) 4% 4% 11% 11% 5% 5% Adj. Flow (vph) 14 " 75 68 485 996 ' 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 0 0 553 1050 0 Sign Control Stop `Free Free 4+ +t+ Iritersec'tion187t•immary,;:, !;; Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.3% Analysis Period (min) 15. . ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 17 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way ._ane G 67.,7 ��; , ;,:_ NBL°'rNBT m Lane Configurations ) r 1 tit +1' Total =;Lost Time.:(s) 40 . 4.0: 4:0., ' 4`.0 40 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt . 0.850 0.955 i ... Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd::Flow "(prot) ,1687 •).1:509: ;.1671':: 3343 3390 :, Flt Permitted 0.950 0.176 Satd: Flow` (perm)::: ':1.687 `;1509. '::310;,::;3343' 3390 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 150 13 Headway ;Factor' `: ' 1:00 -' ,1:.0Q, 1 00 1.00 1::00 1.00 Volume (vph) 72 111 7 344 876 92 Peak Hour'Factor :. : 0.74; , .0 74;, . 0.78::- 0.78 .0.93 0.93 <' Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 8% 8 %0 5% • 5% Adtw.Flow_(vph) _ • ;_'97::: 150: ' 9' 44:1' 942 99'' Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 150 9 441 1041 0 Turn=Type: :;. Perm pm +pt Protected Phases 4 5 Perrmitted:p1hases; i 4: , . 2 Detector Phases 4 4 5 Minimum Initial (s) __ � 4 0 4 0`,•; ,4:0- < 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total:' Split (s) r''' . 35 0: ;:35:0 22 :0.: 8:5:0. 63.0 *0.0 Total Split ( %) 29.2% 29.2% 18.3 %. 70.8% 52.5% 0.0% Maximum,:Green (s) 31:0 31:0 18.0 81:.0. 59:0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All ;Red Time (s) ;0:5. 0 5{ 0.5 0,5 .. 1.'0:5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag:Optimlze? Yes;: Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode; ;None= ;None..Nonez 'Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) .' 11 0 ,, lit 01.' i 1:1,0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 Act <Effct yGreen .-(s) '_ 9 7 ..47, :. 40 ,..1,. , 35.2. .34:5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.65 0.67 0.64 Vic Ratio :033 ':.0 39 `:'0:03F- .;':,0:20 0,48.: Control Delay 18.1 7.2 3.6 3.7 6.7 Queue Delay : 0 :0 ', p0 0 0:0.: ; 0.0 '0 :0 Total Delay 18.1 7.2 3.6 3.7 6.7 LOS' •` B A A' ;A.. A Approach Delay 11.5 3.7 6.7 Approach.,LOS B A ` 'A ' nersection:S mornary C.ycle,.Length 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 53.9 Natural :Cycle :.55 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum. v /c=Ratio: 0 :48 • Synchro 6 Report Page 18 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Wa Intersection Signal Delay: 6.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7°4 - Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: A ICU,Level of Service-A' Splits and Phases: 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way t�2 ..) 4„ 04 85...,,,,J,-,:,.•:;.:•z,.... !•.,-',....-:::•-•-...:::- .-:::• .•:;•,7:-.:...ii...i.•:.-„,-,4:--;.:-...7:::;.'y....,...'-•:,•,...•ci::;;-:"..;,••:-1...i.:-,:,..i-,:..,,,-'.••'Jr!,:i....:::" .35.t'',...;."`:;:.:.:--::::--:1..":-.,..I;s'.:-:G.:::,::s-:.:---:......tr-,'- i' 06 4\ 05 ...-,'::-.-..:•'..,‘Y...:.,,,-.L,.}..:,g...,.7-..:..::cf...t.!':..1q22:i'.:.-.g:r, Synchro 6 Report Page 19 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 202: S. Ryan Way & 4\ t JnGT i EB (37777_77.777 ,77,3:711:777 ; Lane Configurations r 4 tt+ Lane Util.-factoef,, -1,00- • 4.00:, '1.00 0:95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.937 Fit Protected -0.950 (Y965 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1699 0 1780 3316 0 FIt Permitted : .0:950.i ." r • 0:965 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 0 1780 3316 0 Headway Factor 00 ;:, too • too- • fz: 00 : 1.00 : Volume (vph) 308 653 254 95 237 172 Peak Hour Factor , 9:92 0:92 0.92; Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 3% 36/. 2% 2% Adj:*FloW.(VPh).;':' 33.5. 710 27.6 - '103 - 258 - 187 Lane Group Flow (vph) 335 710 0 379 445 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop iFt7rWOPIY$Orrilal:Y. Control TYpe:.UnSignaliied Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% Analysis.PerioOmin).15 ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 20 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr.• Way LaneKG�oup: +,�T' Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s). Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay. Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Iritersectio618Iirnmarye 4- k. I P EBL, aEBf E.BRA{VVBL v7r3fr voli NBLe NBT;iABR SB,L S,Birist R r'rr +I+ tlo T +t r 4.0 " 4.0 ', 4.0 4.0 14.0 40 4.0 4:0 4:0 -. 4 :0 -... :40; 40 1.00 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 .0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 •0.850 .. 0 :982. 0.941 0 '850 0.950 0.950 0.950 1752 3505 2760 1687 3313- 10;', 1,752: 3298 0.950 0.950 0.950 1752 .'3505 '.2760. 1687 '3313;: 0..1752 :.'3298 613 8 113 1 :00: 1..00 , 1:00 ' 1.00 1.00 1 00, 332 810 1088 320 167 22 100 0 :91 0:91 0.91 0.82 0.82 0.82 ' ., .0.94 3% 3% 3% 7% 365. 890 1196 '390 365 890 1196 390 Prot Perm -Prot 3 7 8 .7 7 7 8 4 "4.0.. 4 :0 -4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 49.0 49:0:. 28.0:.,20: 0 32.7% 32.7% 18.7% 13.3% 45.0 .45.0 24.0 16.0, 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 _ ,0:5 0.5 0.5 Lag Lag Lead Lead Yes Yes. . Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None None 3 4.0. 8.0 57:0 38.0% 53 :0 3.5 0.5 Lag :Yes 3.0 None 7% 7% 3% 204' 27 : ,106 231 0 106 Prot 52.9 408:' .40.8 25,0 0.44 0.34 0.34 0.21 0.47 0.75 0 :89 1.11. 29.9 .41.1 28.1 127.0 0.0 :0.0 0.0 0.0 29.9 41.1 28.1 127.0 C D. C F 33.1 C 12.9...,. 0.11 0.64 60.9 .0.0 60.9 2 0.950 1752 5.036:. ,';1568 0.950 1752 :; 5036'.' 1.568 161 1 '00'" 1 :00 502 322 32 657 236 0.94 0.94 0 :91 '0.91 •:0.91 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 534 343: 35.. ";7,22 259 877 0 35 722 259 Perm 5 5 4.0`` 4.0..; .4:0' 4C 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 00 :290 .62 :0 _: 00. 11.0 _ 44 :0.:.44.0 0.0% 19.3% 41.3% 0.0% 7.3% 29.3% 29.3% 25:0 :' ' 58:0 7:0 40:0 , 40:0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 '0:5. 05:: X0:5 05 Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 `None; Min:. :.:None = Min Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 :...1:1:0 1:1:0;;;.1110 0 0 0 12:5 35 :9. 6:7, . 28.2: 28:2 0.10 0.30 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.59. 0.82 0 37 0.61 0.53 68.8 41.5 73.4 44.5 20.6 0:0 0 :0 0 0:' 0:0 ,; 0:.0 68.8 41.5 73.4 44.5 20.6 D ;E .p,. 44.5 39.4 .1 1 Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11 Synchro 6 Report Page 21 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Way Intersection Signal Delay: 45.1 Intersection Capacity: Utilization 81t.O% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D `ICU kLeyel=of Service. D Splits and Phases: 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Way 4\ 02 * 01 o3 4- 04 29t` §y i r``. i .l44atitaiM .. ' - 1-0 -20NWEZORB157RXYWErarlagFZWKWalttialtt 1 06 y 0E c 08�y� 07 �� $7v.4,1 "t Pi'4' 31EO JSij 'Y F 1'�i JE fcA Ji , a f ! f,. .9 I'' I11 � "s.l c �ry �a } y��y g - �4'i6'"w'S4J arj 01,• Si:• „-:'- 5�4�ii�:'i i�Ind+ 28`s I �,. 49 $...��'� Synchro 6 Report Page 22 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 204: S. 112th St. & E Marginal Way Lane Group 'r Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected. Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph). Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control EBL EBR NBI t 1 ./ BT :'_ SBT <SBR v ,. 1.00 1.00 :,1 :00 0.897 0.988 1531 0:988 1531 1.00' 74 0.84 • 10% `88'. 367 Stop 0.950 0 1641 0 :950 0 1641 1.00 1:00 234 158 0.84 0.92 10% 10% 279 ' . 172 0 172 et T 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00' 0.987 1727 1736 1727 1 :00 465 0.92 10% 505 505 Free 1736 1.00 674 0.69. 8% 977 1081 Free 1.00- 72 8% 104, ,.. Control Type:. Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.1% AnalysisPeriod_(ri in) 15 ,gip �:P�{• ._.:�. a"^t. ICU Level of Service D Synchro 6 Report Page 23 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way E3T...;:,•NIBR,: SeF,..SBT:T, Lane Configurations y t, "i + 1,TOIALL:ot".1700s),;„,'_:.,:;. .: ..,-'4,0.7 - 4,0:::'-4.0,J': -,4.0 :. !„.1..".0 ; '4,0 Lane GUI. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt ::,:i - . .;.:: ' .:- 0..872 • .: . 4.0968 Fit Protected 0.998 0.950 s'at.:),-Flpit:(prbt) .: . 1653 - ..o's . 1740 . .. 0 1671 1759 Flt Permitted 0.998 0.950 Std..,F1*,(Perm) ...'„i 1653 0 1;1:1740. :0 . 1671, 1769... Satd. Flow (RTOR) 133 2 1=16aaWaSji:..,Fadtor.:1;:.!,.'' .: :1:w_, - sl;. 00' : 1'.60...::: 1.00 . 1L:00 ; '1:00', Volume (vph) 5 101 556 9 256 639 Pi4:1.=10yr:Fatiir.•.:' :' ,.': -."0.7.6- - 0.761.j- ,0.851. :0.85 .0189 , ' .01.89:: :- Heavy Vehicles (%") 0% 0% 9% 9% 8% 8% AdrFloW (Vjoh) .' 2 , - ' . 7 .• -2 133 '''' 654. : 11 : 288 :. -718 Lane Group Flow (vph) 140 0 665 0 288 718 Protected Phases 8 2 Prot Turn Type: .‘. , ". - . '' ., ' 1 6 peitnitted:OiaSes .. -; ....,: '8 • ' . Detector Phases 8 2 1 6 Mirliii)OrN.Oit6!...441*:1 '',:..:•:A911' . . !:.i:'4'-0: - Aja 4.:0_ r Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split (S) •:.H,97,..:, .,..- •P.20.0-: 0 0 - 26:0 ' • - 0.0 14.0 : 40.0, Total Split (%) 33.3% 6.66/0 43.3°/0 0.0% 23.3% 66.7% Maxirrium, Green :(s).i„. . :;..1 &O. .• . :.- ,:::, '2210- 10:0:; .36.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All Red (s) f... , . 2..'_ 0:5 . i: ' 0 5 . ",0,5 , 0:5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Optirniie? . ',,i. :-.. , , . .;')%es .- , -,`YeS Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Redall,M6de .'.. •• : ''' .; None ; '::;-,Miri:. '. None . - • Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flagli,Dont Walk (s) .11:01,.. ' . ' 11:0 11.0 . Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 4t Effct Green (s) :1: ..1:', 1'6;8. -.., ,...,.4.-7.: . , :- 1i0.0,,, .39:5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.48 0.19 0.76 ii.,c-',10P0...; •••,;::•';!i'. :,,'::`,, : ''',.p:4,..s. , .s ...- .0.,80 '. ;•• , . • 0,89: . 0.53 Control Delay 9.5 23.9 53.2 5.5 Queue Delay ' ., 0 0 i, . . 0.0 .9.0 0:0 Total Delay 9.5 23.9 53.2 5.5 LOS.-.... :: , A ... C , , D A Approach Delay 9.5 23.9 19.2 Approach LOS . , A , ' C, , . B ntersectiolaurnmary Cycle Length Actuated Cycle Length: 51.7 Natural Cycle .80 • '; Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio 0 89 vIrt;c1:.. . . • ' Synchro 6 Report Page 24 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way Intersection Signal Delay: 20.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.5 °6 Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C • ICU, Level.'of :Services B Splits and Phases: 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Wa ``` of I o2 'r 08 14 1' . .. - [2FiS.. i. Y n .l.P ir:!i,." 06 no .: i:Er. ..1 .. j 71i",3. :I.+Y._ir : . h...,. _ z . bd i:, 0. ''Y:37-V;.5:.{ °19-;i p15z + { ,12iN• .ti20 5 . : %uiTnw�l :ry?.: 6T::.,M i Synchro 6 Report Page 25 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way { 4- 4\ t 4, Lari'e Groups ;; P 9. ``EBL,`: EBT 'EBR WBL` " VVBTa :WBR `NBL NBTs: NBV17 SBL:; ;SBT 118BR 4 0 4.0' 4:0 4 :0 4:0 4.0.. 4.0 .. 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 ..r '0 :850 0;850: 0.850 0.998 0.950 3374" 1509 :. "0 3188 1429 3273 1776 2656 0.698 0.950 3374 '1509 0 2230 1429 3273 1776 2656 303 344 1032 ,1.00 1,00 .1.00: 1 :00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 723 276 5 143 310 639 379 983 0:91 091 `0.90 :0.90 0:90 :0.84 0.84 0.84 Lane Configurations 'Ili ft r ) Total 'Lost Time -(s) , . 4.0 , - :40 4.0; 4.0. Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 FrC, . 0:85.0; Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd:- How'(prot): 3335 :.,3.,438 x;1538+ 1687` Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd :Flow (perm):_;:. 3335 4438":6:1538:: °1'687 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 •Headway Factor 1 00. 1 00 .�1 00,,:� 1.00 Volume (vph) 182 490 11 274 Peak hour,- Factor= 0`84 A 84 .0. 84y-'- 0:91;:. Heavy Vehicles ( %) 5% 5% 5% . 7% Add Flow;(Vph) .. Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn'Type" Protected Phases permitted `Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s)':: Minimum Split (s) Total,Split .(s). Total Split ( %) Maximum Green':(s Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time.(s) Lead /Lag Lead- Lag >Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall: Mode Walk Time.(s) Flash: Dont Walk: (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green;(s). Actuated g/C Ratio V7c;,Ratio"';. Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS;; Approach Delay ApproachILOS: :217 583 13 << ;301 217 583 13 301 Prot ;custom :.:Split 2 3 7% 7% 13% 13% 13% 7% 7% 7% 795 ` 303_... 6 159 344` 761 451 1170 165 344 761 451 1170 Free Perm Prot Split custom 1 1 4 4 12 795 303 0 '` 2 2.:a Free 1: 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 40 4'0 40 4.0: 4:0 .: 4.0_:; 20.0 20.0 20.0. 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 36 0 36:0„"T. 36.0` 440:' 44.0 0;0 21 :0 ,. 21.0 24.0% 24.0% 24.0% 29.3% 29.3% 0.0% 14.0% 14.0% ‘.4().c) 40.0: 17.0 17 :0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5- Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Yes Yes, '`; Yes :Yes. Yee °' 'Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Mi ., Min :: Miri! = None: None Min. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 • '110'•1'10: 2•1:0': 11:0 0 0 0 0 :29 8' ,:29 8 .29.6.: 35.9... 35.9-.:137 0:, 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.26 0.26 1.00 0:301= ::'.0 78 ,0 04 0.68.- 0 :90 0.20. 48.6 60.6 39.7 56.0 63.8 0.3 0.0 48.6 60.6 39.7 56.0 63.8 0.3 E. E. " A 48.3 Intersection S mma Cycled ength:_ 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 137 Natural Cycle: 90" Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum. v/c Ratio: 0:90 r.: 3.0 Min 5.0 1.1.0 0 1'5.8 0.12 '0.64 73.4 0.0 73.4 34.6 1 4 4 12 ::4.0 4.0 4.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 21.0 49.0 49.0 57.0 14.0% 32.7% 32.7% 38.0% 17.0 45.0 45.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5- 0.5 Lead Lag • Lag Yes Yes. Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min None None 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 15.8 38.9 38.9 49.7 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.36 0.73 0.82 0.89 0.72 16.0 54.6 69.2 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 54.6 69.2 7.7 B D E A 34.3 C Synchro 6 Report Page 26 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way Intersection Signal Delay: 41.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% • Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D ICU Level of Service C.' Splits and Phases: 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way Synchro 6 Report Page 27 Mirai Associates, Inc. s'4`'' 02 7 os '`► 04 K'yt t'rlfr ittirci,:kiia . i 21 i' Ami +i &i d,i6;s i'' :,:.: `.. 1 '_4'4i's : Yes'..•'>'i' >: ,'•i:Ak'['t(491i Synchro 6 Report Page 27 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. -� -► • 4- `\ I EBT 'EBR; `WBL WBT: -WBR 0117 NBT SBL J+.`FSBT. rSBF.R Lane Configurations Total Lost-Time (s)`: • Lane Util. Factor Frt :.0.878: Fit Protected 0.950 Satd . Flow (prot) : " '1787 1652`: Flt Permitted 0.728 Satd Flow °(perm);. , 1370 .1652 r Satd. Flow (RTOR) 113 Headway Factor ' 1:00 1 00 Volume (vph) 208 91 Peak *Hour: Factor ;0:87: 0:87 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% Adj: :-Flow-(.vph).' '239. 105 Lane Group Flow (vph) 239 556 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Peimitted•Phases, ;. 4 0.883 0.950 -.0 ' 1671' 1553 0.174 .:306:, 1553 35 1 00 1:00 100 392 238 8 0.87 0,.77: 0;77 1% 8% 8% 451,. :309 41 0 309 45 Perrri 8'. 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.950 0 1703 0.950 0': :1703 1.00„., 1.00, 27 42 0 :77... 0.95 8% 6% X44, 44 Prot 35; 0 5 4.0 0.95 0.980 4.0 4 :0' 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 ' 0.997 0.950 3338 0 1752 3494 0.950 3338 0 1752 3494 0 31 3 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 568 87 41 1800 33 .0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 6% 6% 3% 3% 3% .598 43 1875 34 690 0 43 1909 0 Prot. 1 6 Detector Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 Minimum ,. Initial (s). :. r' 4 0Y ;4 0< {... 4:0. 4 :0 4;0,.. 4.0 .. 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 . 8.0 20.0 8.0 Totai,,Split -,(s) ... /L27 0'`27 -0..,. '0.0.;,, • 27.0 27:0`: • 0:0.• '.`8.0 :45:0 : 0 :0 8:0 Total Split ( %o) 33.8% 33.8% 0.0% 33.8% 33.8% 0.0% 10.0% 56.3% 0.0% 10.0% Maximum Green (s) ;23 0 ''`23 0 ' 230' 23:0`'. Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Alf- Red,Time,(5) 0 :5.,- ' '0:5 ,,0 :5 10 :5 Lead /Lag Lead Lag-,Optimize Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode . None Walk Time (s) 5.0 Flash'Dont;Walk Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act4Eff ct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v /c'Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS.' Approach Delay Approach :LOS, 3.0 None' ,• 5.0 ;1_:1:0- 0 0 1; f _23 :1.. 0.30 0.30 0 :58 '097 30.4 54.5 30.4 54.5 D:. 47.3 3.0 3.0 None.:: None. 5.0 5.0 0. 0 23 :1 23.1 0.30 0.30 3.36 . .0 :09 1103.5 10.3 0,0 _J0 0 1103.5 10.3 F... B.. 964.5 '.F - 4 :0 "41:0 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 Lag Lag Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 .None Min 5.0 11.0 0 4'.0 "41.1 0.05 0.54 0.52 0.38 59.8 11.2 0 :0, X0.0 59.8 11.2 E B 14.1 6 4.0 20.0 45.0 56.3% :4.0 ' 41.0 3.5 3.5 0.5 . 0.5 Lead Lead Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 None . Min 5.0 11.0 0 '4.0 41.1 0.05 0.54 0.49 1.02 56.7 46.4 0.0 0.0 56.7 46.4 E D 46.6 D 0.0 0.0% Cycle'Length: 80_.. Actuated'Cycle Length: 76.8 Natural. Cycle: ` 150 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v[c Ratio:•,3 :36 Synchro 6 Report Page 28 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. Intersection Signal Delay: 125.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: F ICU; Level of Service G Splits and Phases: 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. m1 m2 A = ► 04 al , . Ii T. � {? 45 S'< .wiiN:. _ > . .. ..., .. r �. .. .L;r; . 27 S. ;5....u.,. d... �i it mE 11\ r 08 45r.tF+ -rM`. Me.i.: 5... ,. .. .,+n�..r.%.. ,. ..- -.'t4� °stfid 7h�4'ts.. .... jm5 F �i 6py t� :I�...�. 8iiYi;4 ^v.Iii2s.s .,...kt'+-*1.':4 :41,g •a f,.4 ,^1...;". Synchro 6 Report Page 29 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way Lane Group >, . Lane Configurations Total: Lost Time: (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd .Flow;(prot) Fit Permitted Satd: Flowiperm)= , Satd. Flow (RTOR). Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak.Hour,: f=actor Heavy Vehicles (%) Add °Flow'.(vph) EBT••'.`:EBR' 4.0... '4:0 . 1.00 1.00 0.892: 0.950 .1641 1541 0.713 1232 13 100. 16 13 34 , 0 87 10% 10% 10% 7.39 Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 54 0 Turn °T a :Perm ` Protected Phases Pertnitted.'Ph'ases Minimum Split (s) Total;Split,(s) Total Split ( %) MaximumdGreen.(s).' Yellow Time (s) AU- Red Time (s),. Lead /Lag Lead =L'ag; Opti m ize ?, Walk -Time (s) 5.0 Flash, Dont:Walk,(s) `;1'.1 :0:' <• Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 Act Effct'Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue. Delay Total Delay LOS".:. Approach Delay Approach LOS C ♦- k t t 1 4/ WBL'.;; V1BT.. 1NBR 'NBL:;:NBT;NBR;: ,SBL t" SBT `;PSBR 1 +I 4.0 4.0 '4.0 4.0 .: 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0:888 0.988 0.950 0.950 - . 0.950 1687:'. 1577 -- 0:';'` 1612 3185 0 1736 0.722 0.111 . 0.442 .1.282 ' 15.77. 0 . '188: 3185 0 807 51 26 1.00 1 00 . 1'.00 1: 00 1..00 1:00 115 11 32 2 452 38 0 :63 ., .03. 0 63:.. 0.;90 0.90 . 0.90 7% 7% 7% 12% 12% 12% 17 " ... 51 2 502 42 183 68 0 2 544 0 Perm Perrri.:. 141 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.999 1.00 85 0.91 4% 93 93 Perm 4:. 8 -2 6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 ,20.0::..20'.0 10.0 20:0`• 20.0 0.0 40'. 0. . 40.0: 0.0 40.0 40.0 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% :16 ?0 , '4100 y : 16 :0 -.::'1',6:0;.' "'.' 36.w 36.0 ` ' x'.36.0 36.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 .0 .5 :;;0'S.':.. 0.5- -,.: 0:5 0 5 • 0:5.,,. 0 :5 0.5 3468 0 3468 0 2 1.00 1.00 1767 14 0.91 0.91 4% 4% 1942 15 1957 0 6 5.0 16;0 15 0; 0.27 0.27 0 :05 '. 0.13. 17.1 14.6 0:0; X00'•.:` 17.1 14.6 15.2 5.0 1.1 :0_ 0 16:0 0.27 0.54 25.6 0.0 25.6 5.0 1!1:0 0 0.27 0.15 .'. 8.7 0:0 8.7 21.0 5.0 11'.0, 0 :36:0. 0.60 0,02 4.0 0 :0 4.0 A - 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 36.0 36.0 0.60 0.60 0.19 0.94 6.7 22.6 0.0 0.5 6.7 23.1 A C 22.3 C 0.0 0.0% n ersection`;Surnrrary C:ycle:Length: 60 ' Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset 56 (93 %),,;Refer.enced td %phase &2 :NBTL:and'.6 :SBTL ;::Start :of:Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type:•Pretimed: -_ Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection n :Signal. Delay :18 7. Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.7% Analysis: Period '(min) 15 Intersection LOS:: B ICU Level of Service D Synchro 6 Report Page 30 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 254: S. Norfolk St. & E-Marginal Way Splits and Phases: 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way o2 04 40.. li . .. r. _ s. , ;: <,.;:''..,.0 I , :`t1 20TSi,. r: +ka tu,� 3• �. i e3':._ c•l:• ''1 ' 06 41— 08 401.. tea;,r..,i- .;9:;..t? ' .__.7 - :. .:;: '... ..- ,.• ..• t..t t.✓ :04,7 r 4 Y 1-:Jd. I.. -. .f •, Synchro 6 Report Page 31 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 255: SR -99 WB Ramps & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. Lane Configurations Lane..Util Factor Frt FIt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1536 0 0 Headway: Factor 1:00 1 ?;00 1:00', 1:00; 1':00 Volume (vph) 0 0 135 0 0 Peak: Hour;Factoc: ; :0:68 0.68> ;0.6$.- .0.52, ...0 52 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% 7% 7% 18% 18% Adj: Flow;(vph) 0 ;' 0 , . ;199 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 199 0 0 Sign;.Control Stop; • Stop ERTri;EBR ° WBC;eWBT WBE,17" NBL:. NB:T a 1BR` :7..;SBll,- .Z;SBT firSBR 1..00 .,.1.00 1.00 ' .;`1.00 0.95 1:00 1.00 0.91: 0.91 0.865 0.865 0.991 ,. n ersectiol(1' Sul'111'11,ary,.. A•%.'qJ O;• - �""'�...� Y :.5 t Con'trofType: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.4% AnalysisPeriod,`(min).1 :5 .: 1393 0 1.00 1.00 114 0 • 0.52 : r 0.96 18% 4% 21'9 `.0 219 0- 0 4991 0 3471 0 0 4991 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 671 0 0 2333 150 0:96 - 0.96 0.90 0.90 0.90 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 699 0 0 2592 167 0 699 0 0 2759 0 Free' Free 7�" ' i i t�.� i4i• 1 5c` f .� ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page.32 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 256: S 116th Way & Tukwila Intl Blvd. -� f 4_ t r� Lane:Group .;. .,,,17Ez; : Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 256: S 116th Way & Tukwila Intl Blvd. Intersection Signal Delay: 44.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization : 92.9 %d;. Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D ICU Level of Service F Splits and Phases: 256: S 116th Way & Tukwila Intl Blvd. y 01 I 02 4 4 89 s:1: rs . 1;,:4i, a ... 4..F., T.^f. ,1..., :3 . .;.... ..:> T A 28 ;S; r. ''7' :,,3: .ai. 23`s _, .. t: 4\ 05 l 06 .. 102 '�. 7 >..- , IA; s�^ �.3 sw �..• 7 : :,• : ,,:. v. ,; ... f. : ` a...! ; :,. , ... - ,.. a V" f, Synchro 6 Report Page 34 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 Baseline PM Peak Hour 257: SR599/SR99 WB Slip Ramp & Tukwila Intl. Blvd LaneTGroup ;w WBR p NBT : :...NBR r . SBL- < SBT Lane Configurations 44 j ft, Lane Util. Factor 1:00 .1;00 0;95 1:00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 3505 1568 0 3505 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 3505 1568 0 3505 Headway Factor 1.00. ` 1:00 1:00 1,00 1,00 1.00 Volume (vph) 0 .. 0 646 367 0 1049 Peak Hour Factor 0:25 ' 0.25 0:93 0.93 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% . 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 695 395. 0 ,1220.. Lane Group Flow (vph). 0 0 695 395 0 1220 Sign Control Stop Free .. ,. Free Intersection- Summary Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.3% Analysis Period (min) 15. ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 35 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way N 4\ t 1 4' Lane''Group Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) 4 :0 4.0 _4.0 4.0 ',4.o , 4 :0 ,: Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0:995 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1570 .:1404 1612: 3223 3487 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.250 Satd. Flow (perm) 1570 1404 424. 3223 3487 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 9 Headway Factor • 1.00 ' , 1 :00 '' 1`.00 1 00 1.00'' 1.06' Volume (vph) 35 146 112 338 1381 45 Peak Hour Factor. 0.61 0.61 '6:95 0.95.- 093 0:9,3 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 15% 15% 12% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 57 239 118 356 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 239 118 356 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases . 4 2 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20 :0 20.0 20.0. 20.0. , 20.0 :.. •0. Total Split ( %) 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 , -16 :0 16.0 16.0 ;-16.0 :- :' _• Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 •. 0:5 ' 0.5 0.5 i.:0:5 .. r 1+ ft. 0.95 3% 1485 1533 3% 48.' 0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Waik (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green.' (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0' 11.0 .1110, 11.0 '11 0 ;- 0 0 0 0 0 1.60: 160 , 60 .:..160 ::;1:60':: 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0 :09' 0:42 0.69 0.28 1.10 8.0 11.4 38.6 8.8 65.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 11.4 38.6 8.8 65.0 D. A E 16.2 65.0 B E. A B 10.7 r�q �.. w[' ay-' R: rtu+ ow':. v'c�t�. Yr�• }f,'{77v'?�7'>?Yn'�4.'': -•; IritersectloniSummary,,;..,� e �.; ;,;�: Cycle Length: 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT;'Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 48.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection;; LOS: ;D ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 1 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way Splits and Phases: 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way 44st 02 ...-4 2IIVRA:Mntil-gliNqVi:gi'.:::42,,`44:74ial,::::;:--..:::..;-, 20.i:::‘•1:•?..':.%;i1;.:Pii.-1-:7.:',7.;:i*i,':!..:•••.qt:'...;"i,:-...,••••,:.:: ::-::;:j.,1•,-'1...:-..:•'....;),1 i' m6 . • 20roV-53'.44k4,1;4.'-!?t:;',.P.M'it;•:-.'4:7.....,,-•::-4,:liiii,,TIAV>.1-,',••••!:. :'::.:;:•:•• .•,', Synchro 6 Report Page 2. Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S LaneLGroup Lane Configurations Total :Lost Time (s): Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot). Flt Permitted Satd. Flow,(perm). Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow. (vph)' Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted. Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split.(s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s), Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act.Effct Green-(s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS µ`EBT :,EBR INBL s:OBTa r 44+ 4.0 14.0 4 :0 4`0. 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 :963 0.850 3112 1374 31.12; 1374 121 587 1:00.: 1:00 631 757 0.94 0.94. 7% 7% 671 805 889 587 0.994 0 ' :4910 0.745 0 X3680 1.00 90 . 0.91 5% 99 0 1.00 604 0.91 5% 664 763 4 NBL,; BR, 4.0 4.0 ' . 0.94 1.00 0.850; 0.950 4.802 :.:.1524, 0.950 4802 1524!'. 80 1.00 70 0 ..88. 6% -.80. 80 1 :.00 441 0:88, 6% *50.1 501 Perm; .. Perm. Perm 4 _. 4 8 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20:0 .20.0- 20.0; 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16.0 16.0 16.0 16 :0 16:0.... 16:0: 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 :5 .0:5 015"; 5.0 11.0 0 . 16.0 0.40 0.68 11.6 0.0. 11.6 9.0 A: 'nt Sumrnary,7„7+, t 5.0 11.0 0 16.0 0.40 0.65 5.1 00 5.1 ,A 5.0 11..0 0 5.0 11.0 0 16.0 0.40 0.52 10.7 10.7 10.7 7.8 5.0 11.0 0 16 0 0.40 0 :26 8.5 8.5 5.0 11.0 0 16.0:" 0.40 0:12 3.1 0.0. 3.1 f:d AP Cycle Length: 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:; Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 9 :2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% Analysis Period (min) 1.5 Intersection :LOS: A Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 3 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S Splits and Phases: 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S 4''02 X04 2 U s is T/ 7.1° Yi¢. . a ,M_ MIryryTYI l:Y 2 tr a A17,7�' 4y1 W I i 08 2O $;t`;: W:.e. ".:. '}X- �,_..!r 1. •u lgY.11:.74 I+Y 416Ft:•.4 Synchro 6 Report Page 4 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 153: S Albro PI & Stanle Ave S Larie;Group ;EBL .. �riEBT ; EBR ,: :WBL ..WBT. „'WBR : NBL" NBT : NBR SBL :u SB,T 'SBR Lane Configurations 4t+ 4+ 4+ Total Lost Time (s) 4:0 ' 4.0 4:0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0... 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.923 0.911 Flt Protected 0.995 0.995 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3487 0 0 3'173: '. 0: 0 ' -1672' Flt Permitted 0.828 0.983 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 •2902 . 0 0 .3173 0 : 0 '1652; ' Satd. Flow (RTOR) 335 97 Headway Factor 1:00 1`:00 1.00` 1.00 ., . 1,00- 1 00 x ;: ‘,1:.00,. .,1.00. :1:00. Volume (vph) 75 618 0 0 279 295 . 11 28 76 Peak Hour Factor. 0:88 .. 0.88. 0:88 . 0.88, "..0.88.:; ....0 88,:: 6.78 . ,9.78, . 0.78:, Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 85 702 0 0 317 ' " :335 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 787 0 0 652 0 0 0 Turn Type Perm Perm m - Per Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases . 4 _ - 8 2;: .6 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20:0 20.0 � 0.0 20.:o 20.0 0.0• 20.01- 20:0 0.0 20 0 .: 20 :0 0 :0 Total Split ( %) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 :16.0 -,' 16.0 ' •16.0 : ,.16 0} :; 16.0: 100 • 16:0: Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 '0.5 0..5. 0.5::; 0 5';.: '015 4+ 4.0 14.0 4:0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1900;: 1900 ' - 1:,00 0 0 0 0.25 0:25' 0% 0% 0% '0 0 3% 3% 3% 36 . 97 147 0 '0 0 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 .11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 16;0.- :.:., . 16:0 -.. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.44. Control Delay 13.5 5.2 Queue Delay ,. Total Delay 13.5 5.2 LOS , ..B... .. A • Approach Delay 13.5 5.2 Approach LOS B Intersecti'onSummary:, rr;�,7::r. Cycle Length: 40. Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2 :NBTL and 6 :SBTL; Start of .Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c :Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Signal: Delay: 9.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% Analysis Period (min). 15_ 5.0 5.0 11.0 110 0 0 0.40 0.20, 4.5 4.5 A 4.5 5.0 5.0 11-:0: .11:0 0 0 .l ntersection :LOS:.A ' ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 5 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S Splits and Phases: 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S 02 ""0" 04- 20 s ;= i B 7NS'Atll?f:: ;Ai`} y 7i : '1. ;.t ^1.2O:S :gkiea . ..i! .t h Y nMy Y y A'" 'i. l :L'.i:: n ;A 11"1> 06 08 d. q� y _ ".�20.4R !fop q v F .. ^ it';Z*•• rsT+� � y p .� 0.1.6" «.�'` trf l 31 2OrS4�tD• , rilS),'S ;q:' br Vil' +``::Y �+`tiZ- t %C 7: Synchro 6 Report Page 6 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 157: S Norfolk St & Martin Luther. King Jr. Way 4\ t j 4/ Lane'Group ,EBL 4 -EBR NBL Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor :1,00' Frt 0.877 Flt Protected 0.996 Satd. Flow (prot) 1551 Flt Permitted 01996 Flow (perm) 1551 Headway Factor 1.00 Volume (vph) 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.69 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 7% Adj.. Flovv (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 229 Sign Control Stop InteisectioriSummary NBT SBTr;''SBR 4 +. TI . 1.00, :` 0.95 0.95 O.95 0.95 :., 0.999 0.996 0 3392 3402 0.996. - 0 0 3392 3402 1.00 1.00 1.00:...1 :00 1:00 144 53 667 700 5 0.69. 0:90 0.90 .0.89 .0:89 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 20 209 59 741 787 `6 0 0 800 793 Free Free': Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% Analysis-Period (min) 15 0 ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 7 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way C `1 t l' `► 4/ La e:Grou .`.'. EBL :.EBT ..:EBR ;WBL WBT WBR :,, NBL *NBT° NBR YS8Cl 7S8T: SBR Lane Configurations 4+ ) 4 r ) Ti ) 14* Total.Lost Time ,(s), 4'0 4.0 -,r4.0, -4.0 4.0 4.0. 4:0, 4.0 '4.0 4.0 4 :0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 .1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt :0:959 = 0 :850 ::; 0.961'. Fit Protected 0.997 0.950 0.984 0.950 0.950 Satd i.Flow;.(prot) _`' ,..o.. 1764 - 0 ';:1649. ;1708 ,.1553` :1770. 3401 0 1736 : 3471 0 Flt Permitted 0.983 0.776 0.888 0.442 0.315 Satd:•Flow-(perm), 0 1739 0: '1347. 1541 1553.: -•;823 3401 0 575 3471 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 45 29 144 1 Headway Factor 1 :0.0 1 00 ;1 00 , 1.00 1: :00 1:00 1.00 • 1.00 - .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 9 80 39 127 77 24 46 520 180 100 516 1 Peak:Hour, Factor::-. 0:86';...'• 0:86: '.6.86.1.; `:0.83; : 0 :83 6.83 0 :96 ' ` 0.96 0:96 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 6'1 Flow (vph) •10::: `93k 45 .153' ,93 29 48 542 •' - .188 103 532 1 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 148 0 108 138 29 48 730 0 103 533 0 Turn Perm;. . Perth .`Perin'• Perm Perm Protected Phases Permitted :: Phases,.::, Minimum Split (s) Total;Splity (s). Total Split ( %) Maximum GGreen:;(s) Yellow Time (s) All RedTime(s) Lead /Lag Lead- Lag_Optimize? Walk Time (s) 5.0 Flash :Dona Walk,(s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act;Effct- •reen. "(s) Actuated g/C Ratio ../CiRatio-* z Control Delay QueueDelay'.'- Total Delay Approach Delay Approach. LOS , ntersection Summary Cycle Length 40... Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0;:( 0% ):,::Referenced'to.phase:2:NBTL andi6:SBTL.Start.of,Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control :Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection :Signal :Delay::�9 2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% Analysis Period (miin):: :15 ;. 4 8 4 .. 8 8 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 ::20 ;6`:.'20 0 0 0'- ':20.0' 20:0 20 :0 .•20.0 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% ;160 .;160 16:0' '1:6 :0 16.0' :16:0 3.5 3.5 3.5 .3.5 3.5 3.5 i0 5': 05 .5' 0.5 %: 6:5: 0:5 : , . 0:5 5.0 11:0 0 0 0.40 0:201;. 6.7 0;0 6.7 6.7 s. 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 .'11. :0.: 11.0 11.0. .11:0 0 0 0 0 x16:0 1,6.0 16.0 16 :0 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 `0.20.: :6 :22. 0.05:. 0.15, 9.1 9.2 ' 3.9 9.1 0 :0 ,`0.0' 0.0 0.0 9.1 9.2 3.9 9.1 A A A 8.6 2 6 6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 16.0 16.0 16.0. 3.5 3.5 3.5 • 0 :5 0.5 0.5 5.0 11 :0 0 16:0: 0.40 0.50. 8.6 0.0 8.6 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 16.0 16 :0 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.38 16.5 9.5 0 :0 0.0 16.5 9.5 B A 8.6 10.6 A IntersectionLOS: A; ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way Splits and Phases: 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Wa 02 = Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 167: S Hardy St & Airport Way S 4\ t Lane Configurations Lane UtiI Factor 1 00 1.00 Frt 0.886 Flt Protected 0 992 Satd. Flow (prot) 1606 Fits Permitted ; ' 0:992.! Satd. Flow (perm) 1606 0 Headway Factor .1100- ..1'.00,..;* Volume (vph) 9 48 PeOls,,HOUr,..F44or 0 65 0 65 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% Adj FIow (vph) 14 74 Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 0 Sig n.,ConfiTOI Stop Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.2% Analysi&Period!.(min) 15 4+ ft+ 0.95 695 095 0.992 0 3233 3411 0 .,- .0f994• ' • 0 3233 3411 0 100 100 ,: f00 , 1.00 • 48 349 806 44 0.81 0.81 '6433 • 083 ' 11% 11% 5% •5% : ; :53 0 490 1024 0 :Free; Free . . ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 10 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 201: S. Norfolk St. & AirAirport Wa 4' "1.-• • - • Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd, Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) -- Peak Hour Factor 0.74 - 0.74 7 0.78: .0.78 .0..93 0:93 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 8% 8% 5% 5% Adj. Flow (vph) 73 ..115 9 373 , 917 89 Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 115 9 373 1006 0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases. 4 2 Detector Phases 4 4 5 2 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4:0 4.0 4.0- 4.0 .4.0' Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 -. 8:0- 85.0: 610- . :0.0 Total Split (%) 29.2% 29.2% 6.7% 70.8% 52.5% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 31:0 4.0 ' .81.0, 59.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.6'• 0 5 .; Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes . -Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode- 'None- Wine None Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 • Flash Dont Walk (S) 111.0 11.6: 41:0' 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 9.5 9.5 38.7 ' 39.5 37.8 .s Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.61 v/c Ratio 0..27 0.34 - '0:03 Control Delay 16.5 7.2 4.9 Queue Delay- :0.0 0.0' 0.0' Total Delay 16.5 7.2 4.9 _ LOS • '''B - A A Approach Delay 10.8 Approach LOS „ B 44+ tio 4.0 40 4.0 40 :4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.850 0.987 0.950 0.950 1687 1509 1671. .3343 3393 0.950 0.212 1687 1509 373 3343 3393 115 15 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 '1.00 1.00_ . 54 85 7 291 853 83 0 ' • Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 57.4 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45 0.69 0.66 0:16 0.45' 3.3 .5.9 'CO ;0.0 . 3.3 5.9 A A • 3.4 5.9 A • • •-• • !qc.• • 7::t• •v • Synchro 6 Report Page 11 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way Intersection Signal Delay: 5.9 Intersection 'f.Capacity Utilization'38 2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: A 1CUlLevel of Service A Solits and Phases: 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Wa o2 04 4 • _ ; A : °, f : N ,a W70 - -:. 1. ;: 35 s -,. ;.'... i4'= 4\ 0! 06 s ;' -,: t . ';:_ ::;` `,: ...0, '•. ib E}i=: ... •8I163 Z i ; ;. ..: i l :,,'., Synchro 6 Report Page 12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 202: S. Ryan Way & 4\ t 1 4/ Cane Group.';,, ;EBL EBR :;N,BL ' ;'NBT,., :.SBT; T SBR. Lane. Configurations Lane Util. Factor Frt .r 4 1:00 1.00 1:00':.. 1.00 0.850 Flt Protected 0:950 0 :965`. Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 0 1780 Flt Permitted_ 0,.950 0:965 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 0 1780 3316 0 Headway Factor 1.00 1:00 1..00 1:00: 1'.00 . 1‘.0,0'..s: . Volume (vph) 277 587 244 93 235 168 Peak Hour Factor. - 0.92 0:92.- ..0.92 0.92 0.92: "'.0 92:, ; Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 301 638 265 101 255 183 Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 638 0 366 438 0 Sign Control Stop. Stop In ersectioq >Su rrimary .,a ,., Control Type: Unsignalizeti' Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 0:95::.:0.95., ": 0.937 3316 ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 13 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Way Lane roup::' , Lane Configurations Total Lost Time;(s) .. Lane Util. Factor F`rt' Flt Protected Satd: lz low (prot) Flt Permitted Satd' Flow'(perm). Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway` Factor'' • Volume (vph) PeakHourFactor. Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adf Flow: (vph) -� -4\ t 'EBL .;' • EBT..,, :EBR .;.WBL, _. WB.T `= WBR::" NBL':. :.NBT• Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn :TYpe Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial;(s): Minimum Split (s) TotalSplit_(s) Total Split (%) Maximum,Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead= Lag.:Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode' Walk Time (s) Flash' :Dont Walk,•(s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act : :EffctGreen' s Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay Approach Delay Approach; LOS,: `? ra else_ction`Summary Cycle' Length: `150:'.'`' . Actuated Cycle Length: 109.5 Natural :Cycle:.90. Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord MaximumV /c Ratio :. 0`99,_ ++ .Fir tit 4 :0 40; •4:0 4.0` : >: :4.0: 4.0 1.00 0.95 0.88 1.00 0.95 0.95 0 :850: • 0.981., 0.950 0.950 :.2760:: 1687`..3310 . 0.950 0.950 i .,1:752 =';". 3505'. ::27001:.:1687:, 3310 612. 8 1:00 1: 00 1 00 .. 1.00 1:00 1_.00 -- 298 732 981 317 157 22 ,0.91 -. 091':. 091 0:82 :' 0:82. _ 0 :82 3 % 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% `327- 804' 1078. : ;3877 :191 27. 387 218 Prot 8 327 804 1078 ,Prot Perm 3 7 7 .. 3. 7... 7 4 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 28:0: 20.0 38.0% 32.7% 32.7% 18.7% 13.3% •53 0 ; 45.0, "45.0 .: °24 0� :' 1;6:0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0 :5 05.,05'. 0.5 :..:0:5' Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag `Ye's: Yes , Yes:. ,Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0 .None - `:None: None ;: None None 8 25 :00 35:8. 35,:8!: 25.3 0.23 0.33 0.33 0.23 0.82;. • '.'0.70 0.82 • .0:99 58.1 36.9 20.6 89.5 00 00,. :. -00 00 58.1 36.9 20.6 89.5 D ; 32.1 36.1 0.33 0:20 31.8 0.0 31.8 4:0 - . .4.0. . 1.00 0:95 0.941 0.950 1752. 0.950 1'752 1.00 86 0.94 3% 9.1 91 Prot 2 BR;:;SBLi 4.0 4.0. 0.95 1.00 1 � iSBT?.i iSBR f+ +. r ,:4:0 4.0 0.91 1.00 0.850 0.950 3298` 0 1752 5036 1568 0.950 3298 :.`' -.0. 1752.5036 1568 113 148 1..00: 1.00; 1.00 1.00 1.00 443 284 32 651 216 0.94 .. 0.94 0.91 .. 0.91 0.91 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 471 302 35 715 237 773 0 35 715 237 Prot Perm 6 5 1 2 6 • 4.0 ':4.0 8.0 20.0 0 :0., -29.0:. 62.0. :0 :0 0.0% 19.3% 41.3% 0:0% 25.0= 58:0 :. 3.5 3.5 :0.5 0:5 Lag Lag yes. Yes 3.0 3.0 None - Min 5.0 11.0 0 11.7 29.9 0.10 0.27 0.50 0.79 60.5 38.4 0.0 0.0 60.5 38.4 .0 E D 68.7 40.7 D 5 4:0 8.0 11.0 7.3% 7.0 3.5 0.5 Lead Yes 3.0 None 6.7 0.06 0.34 67.1 0.0 67.1 E 1 4.0. 20.0 44.0 29.3% 40.0 3.5 . 0.5 Lead Yes 3.0 Min 5.0 11.0 0 22.8 0.21 0.68 45.2 0.0 45.2 D 40.3 D 1 1 4.0 20.0 44.0 29.3% 40.0 3.5 0.5 Lead Yes 3.0 Min 5 :0 11.0 0 22.8 0.21 0.53 21.4 0.0 21.4 C Synchro 6 Report Page 14 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd &.Martin Luther King Jr. Way Intersection Signal Delay: 40.2 Intersection Capacity'Utilization 75.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D ICU-Level-of Service Splits and Phases: 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Way i 01y m2 03 4— •04 �44i ;'1: -F j T,i t44V.i:'.i: .1 :::•I29 :s... ' ._ i.. 5'7, ,,s;;;:: a JY ? ;',Di^Z'I,t.i6_F. %Nt.:.4..W,' i4i1:1;12C St.vz ..l :w. 05 t .06 • 08 07 «.1P1'':iril'62.s. ;V-w: • .':w, rv,.4; ' .. .n d 1. '49 +s ,.. .... ..: a ..,..j ,.. _;;.,i1. 28s . & %xA,. t..:,..,:i.:.: I'': Synchro 6 Report Page 15 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 204: S. 112th St. & E Marginal Way rifireTaat:TY.1:,:.; SBR Lane Configurations ¥ T. Laria..)0tit:2Factor '" :coo 1.00 Fri 0.879 0.988 FR PrOtected, 0 ..950; Satd. Flow (prot) 1511 0 1641 1727 1738 0 FIt Permitted 0 995 0.950'; Satd. FIow (perm) 1511 0 1641 1727 1738 0 Headway Factor , .,:1.00 1 00 1 00 1 .00 1 00 1.00 Volume (vph) 22 187 144 440 594 59 Peak Hour Factor 0 81 0 84 0 92 9:92, 0,69 0.69 Heavy Vehicles (%) 10% 10% 10% 10% 8% 8% • 26,!., 223: 157 478 861 Lane Group Flow .(vph) 249 0 157 478 947 0 SignControl Stop Free Fjee Control Type Unsignalize& • jnterspefion..:SArmlfaryalgtett:11',41.,44Axe;14,4#2,w.,;:*.P:-.:, Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% 16u Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Page 16 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way Lane Group ...VBL INBRTNB,T :. `NBR:: ; SBLP .,SBTs% Lane Configurations *fir ii. Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt .0.873 0.998 Flt Protected 0.997 Satd. Flow (prot) '1654' Flt Permitted 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 1654; Satd. Flow (RTOR) 105 Headway Factor 1.00 ' 1.00 Volume (vph) 5 80 Peak Hour Factor 076 0.76 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 7 ,105. Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 0 Turn Type Protected Phases 8 2 1 Permitted Phases Detector Phases 8 2 1 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4:0 4.0''. `14:0. 4 0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20 :0 •0.0 -, 27:0 ' 0.0 13:0 400, Total Split ( %) 33.3% 0.0% 45.0% 0.0% 21.7% 66.7% Maximum. Green. (s) :.16 0 23.0 ' 9.0 36.0'' Yellow Time (s) 3.5 . 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 :0.5 ,' Lead /Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag 'Optimize? Yes Yes.' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min ` None Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 . 11.0 - Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 0 Act Effct'Green (s) 6.8. 27.6: Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.51 v/c Ratio 0:38, 0.71 Control Delay 9.8 18.5 Queue.Delay .0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.8 18.5 LOS 'A " B Approach Delay 9.8 18.5 Approach LOS A _': ...,B, Intersection Summary _ :I, Y Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 54 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 4.0 4.0 4.0;, 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.950 0 1740. 0 1671 `1759., 0.950 0 ... ;1740. 0 .1.671 1759 2 1;00' 1.00 1:00,`:.. 531 9 177 590 :0.85; 0.85 ' 0 :89 90.89':'-, 9% 9% 8% 8% 625- 1:1 199,;. 663: 636 0 199 663 Prot; 3.0 Ming" 5.0 0 9:0 41;4'° 0.17 0.77 0:71 0:49 ' 36.6 4.9 0.0 0 :0: 36.6 4.9 D A. 12.2 Synchro 6 Report Page 17 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way Intersection Signal Delay: 14.6 Intersection Capacity Ut lization 53::5% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B - ICUALevel. of Service A Splits and Phases: 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Wa a. 01 I I 02 S'.. 08 • 1 3s`,`.a1." s:7l_ • " "'127s .,...' x."z .rit-A? `t.c:;`: :` 1 1 �6 S 40,$:`s HxA,..;1','N., ' g g= r '',....Ti..— 1% ,11.4 ?i:,,i iii '7Ir4: hfw ;kT .. R'< z :l' ?: - -P ' '20'sJ.* %.K: . .h.:;d tAf . : • 4 1',.':',:c7'7.1 Synchro 6 Report Page 18 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way �► 1 ♦- & •\ t ,• �. j 4' Larie'Group at3 Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s)... 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd.. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio.. Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS L ; EBT - EBR, WB, T+ r :4.0._ _4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.850. 0.950 3438 ..1538 1687 0.950 3438. •1538; . 1687, 1 1.00 •:..1 00 1.00' 399 2 255 084. :0.84 091 5% 5% 7% 475 2 280 475 2 280 custom Split 3 2 2 0.950 3335 0.950 3335. 1.00 92 0.84 5% .1,10 110 Prot 2 L, vskumeR NBL • -B- ;, o kSBL S:BT $BR ' 40,; 40' , 4:0. 40 40 40 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 0:850 a 0:850 0.850 3374 1509 :0 3374. 1509 277 0.998 0.950 3188'; .1429: `3273? '.1776': 2656 0.721 0.950 0..2303'' -1429: `:3273 ` 177 -6 2656 294 763 1.:00. .1:00, . "• 1.00...:: 1:00:: 1:00: 1 :00' ; 1:00 1:00 693 252 5 113 265 527 299 641 0.91 ,10.91-. 0.90 0 90 0 90 084 ,: 0841' 0:84 7% 7% 13% 13% 13% 7% 7% 7% 762 277 6" `: ;126 294; 62T;: 356 763 762 277 0 132 294 627 356 763 Free erm:: i?'rot . _Split custom 3 1 1 4 4 12 Free'. 1: 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 4 4 1 2 ,4.0: 4.0 `. , 4.0 4.0 r4.0 4 0 '.:,' 4:0:. 4.0 4:0 4 :0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 45:0 45.0- ''450• , 40.0;.: 40.0.:!. 0.0,: • 25 0 ;; 25.0_ 25:0 40:0 <, 40:0, `_• 70 :0 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 26.7% 26.7% 0.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 26.7% 26.7% 46.7% 41.0 41,0 41.0.:36:0,-- 36.0 ' ''2,1:6'-:' 21 0 21;0' 36'0" • 1.36:0 ". F ; ` 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 -0:5 0.5 05 0.5 .:.0.5 .0.5! 0:5 -0 :5 ; .06". 0 :5. Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes , Yes ' Yes ' Yes , Yes:. Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min Min Min` : None :None Min: - :. Min Min -;None.' None 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0. ' .11:0` '11.0 11:0 11.0 11.0 0 `. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.1 25.1 25.1: 31.4 :31:4 ;117:.o.- . :14.8. 14.8 28 2';. 28:2 44:3 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.27 0.27 1.00 0.13 0.13 0.24 0.24 0.38 0.15 0:64 001 0.62 0.84 018 ' ,:0.45 0 :67 :0.79* 0 :83 0.52 41.2 47.9 34.5 48.7 52.6 0.3 57.9 14.4 51.9 62.0 3.1 0.0 0.0...... 0.0 0.0 ; 0.0: ' ,0 .0 1 :.: i00` �`. 0 0 01Q,,, 70!0 : 0:0 41.2 47.9 34.5 48.7 52.6 0.3 57.9 14.4 51.9 62.0 3.1 D C D D A : _E B,.. D. .+ E, D A 46.6 40.8 27.8 32.6 D D C.: C Inlersedioil1Summai if.,-`' Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 117 Natural .Cycle: 90 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v /c. Ratio: 0.84 Synchro 6 Report Page 19 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way Intersection Signal Delay: 36.8 Intersection Capacity; Utilization 56,9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D ICU,iLevel of Service;B Splits and Phases: 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way �r 01 02 .111?- 03 ♦'" 04 25's}`,. ;r_,1 .145a...4 , > .,:?.%....!,; ' ':„ .....: >I` :140'.s'..:1:> ._ .. I`:'.-1 40t4: ....:, . :,.:. ..r,::at Synchro 6 Report Page 20 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. --► c t t l d ':WBT,::ILUBR,T: NEL s..B17 NBR'- ' SBl';: `SBT; SBR Lane Configurations ) '+ _ t+ ) no Total. Lost Time (s).. 4.0 •4.0 40 4.0- 74.0 '4.0. , 4 0. 4 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.881 0:885 0.985 .. Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1657 ..0 ` 1671 1557 0 :1703 13355,' Flt Permitted 0.746 0.303 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1403 ` .1657:,-.'.• 0 533 :1557; p-: -:1703 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 115 13 Headway Factor 1.00 1. :00 :.'.;1.00 .1.00 . 1 :00 Volume (vph) 117 64 249 131 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.77 0.77 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% 1% 8% 8% Adj. Flow (vph) 134 74 286 170 4 .. Lane Group Flow (vph) 134 360 0 170 17 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases; Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s)_ Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS. Approach Delay Approach LOS 4 8 4 4 8 8 5 2 1- 6 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,4.0 .4.0 .. 4:0: 4:0,: 42:0. 20.0 20.0 . 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 27.0 270 00 27.0: 270 00 80 45.0 0!0 ,8:0 45.0 33.8% 33.8% 0.0% 33.8% 33.8% 0.0% 10.0% 56.3% 0.0% 10.0% 56.3% 23:0 23:0 - .23 :0: 23.0 .'4.0 • •541'0_ : 4.0:'. 4:1 ;0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5... 0.5:: 05 : :0:5; 05,;` 0.5`' ,0 :5: ,0.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Yes Yes; . 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None . None. None ' None:. Min. : =, 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11:0. "11.0 -. 0 0 0 0 23.3 23.3 23 :3 : 4:0, 34 :2: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.50 0:28 0.56' 0.94: 018' a;34- :' 21.1 17.9 83.2 40.7 10.9 0.0 0.0 0 :0 0:01., '.0.0'.. 21.1 17.9 83.2 40.7 10:9 1.00 1...00‘, , 10 15 0.77 ; 0:95. 8 %.. 6% ,.., 13: 1.6 0 16 Prot 8 5 4;0 .4 :0.",4:0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0:998 0.950 0.950 3355 23 2 1:00 ``' 1:o0. 1 '00::' 1:00` 1:.00 495 57 34 1448 16 0;98 0 :95 0;:96 . :0 :96 0 :96 6% 6% 3% 3% 3% 521 60 35 ; .1'508 ,17 581 0 35 1525 0 Infersectiori Summary.,.? ". Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 68.5 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94. 3.0 None 5.0 11.0 0 23.3 0.34 0.03 11.8 0.0'. 11.8 B 76.7 E C B 18.8 B Yes 3.0 None :Yes 3.0 5.0 0 .4:0' 35,8 0.05 0.52 0 :36 0':83 - 46.0 19.2 0:0: 0 °0 46.0 19.2 D' B 19.8 B 0.0% Synchro 6 Report Page 21 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. Intersection Signal Delay: 21.7 Intersection Capapity,:Utilization:75.5%.:: .ICUleyel of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C S lits and Phases: 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. \01. ol t�2 81-.','..145,e.':::..',;_...';',.:.;;.:....!,':. ...,,-,!;.-....-..-;2.:..,-,ii'f,i'....;-:.:'',.: ,..:' ••.,..,:'::',•';12.,:..'...' ,,....::,,i.:;1:.:......':, 2T,s...,.4-,.'•'•:...'c.•....'".........:1:i.'2:),';'-:.`:.,;,:-...•-...1:',':.,..., '1 \�5 $ 06 1 08 81h:i.d",•,;,:si-45•s"'...';.,',....i...i.',T,...:,.....:5,:,....1...:;,:',..r:;.'.::':,.14..t.i,i::4.:....::'' ..fii.' 4:,.4.•:..:. . ,t, ,11:41 -* ,.. 27 '"'s-,-,4.,,,,..';'''..=',.::-.„-. -. „... 1 " t Synchro 6 Report Page 22 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way Lane Group ? , 1EBLIEBT: EBR' . :WBL: Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1641 1539 Flt Permitted 0.721 Satd.. Flow (perm)- .1245 1539 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 Headway. Factor: .1 00 1.00 Volume (vph) 15 . 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0,87. Heavy Vehicles ( %) 10% 10% Adj. Flow. (vph) 17 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 17 51 Turn Type . • Perm Protected Phases 4 Permitted Phases 4 8 ". Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 20 :0• 0.0 20.0 20.0' Total Split ( %) 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 '1,6.0... 16.0 ` 16.0 . Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Ail -Red Time (s) 0.5: 0.5 0.5.; ;r 0:5: to 4.0 . X4.0 ' 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.891 40 1.00 V137 ; WBRr. • 4.0 4..0 1.00. 1.00 0 :896 isp5L. ;NBT'.:NBR:" SBL ; ' SB.T PSBR fto ¶ +T 4.0` 4.0 4:0: 4.0 4 :0, ''4.0 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 • s :; 0.984` 0.950 0.950 0 1687 1'591'`.' 0 ;1612 ,3172 0.724 0.250 0 : 1286 1591 0. ' 424::3,172 38 38 1'.00 1.00 -1:00 1 00; ; ";1'.00; 1:00 32 114 11 24 2 311 0.87:.0.63 0.63 :0 63.:;0.90, , :0.90 10% 7% 7% 7% 12% 12% 37 181 11 38 :: 2 346 0 181 55 0 2 387 Perm ; Perm Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? ' Walk Time (s) 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) •11 :0 , Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.0. Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.03 Control Delay 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0' Total Delay 7.6 LOS A Approach Delay Approach LOS 5.0 11. :0 0 16.0• 0.40 0.08 6.9 0.0 6.9 A 7.0 A IntersecfionrSurrimary��= i;�';�,�`��:. •��as€"` Cycle Length: 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6 :SBTL;-Start of. Green,- Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.00 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% Analysis Period. (min)15'.., 5.0 11.0 0 .16:0 0.40 0.35 10.9 00 10.9 B 5.0 11..0 0 16.0., 0.40 0.08 4.6 0:0 4.6 A. 9.4 A `" 0:998 0.950 • 1736 .?3',464 0.523 955 ` .3464 3 1 :00` 1100'' 1`:00: 1:00 37 44 1250 14 0.90. 0 :91- 0.91 12% 4% 4% 4% 41 :48! . 1.374 . 15 0 48 1389 0 Perri .: 6 2' 6 _. 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0`.:._20:0: •''` 20 :0= 0:0,..7,..20.0.:'-s.'7:20:0, -.0.0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% ?16 0 ',.,16.0. ._ 160.;; 16:0..:: • 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0 :5: 05s.. 05: :0:5.: 5.0 ','11..0'. 0 5.0 11.0 - 0 16.0;::'`16 0' 0.40 0.40 001 5.0 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.9 A 5.0 5.0 0 0 16.0 ;::16;0 0:40 0.40 8.7 40.4 8.7 40.4 39.4 Intersection: LOS: C :..•- ICU Level of Service 6 Synchro 6 Report Page 23 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2007 PM Peak Hour 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way Splits and Phases: 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Wa 44 02 -4 04 . 20.7:.t ti. "' ": 7 54.ti. g E' 5 `}01: l 2O _.s':,F ,',, "`:y`;;.._. ., ^; mow: l; u: 06 r 08 3 i yn' 'Y; gh- ... 20tsc�°�'.�.. �(g'.d .:� r'�:i�.i t.�'Y lJ .i,: .^, a '.i' icl5. r+.d`.i p' �¢ ^1 a C`�12C ' ' -:'. . _ . �':. ° A' y.k am : : :: ):PA'r s ".ao M.. ?ra„ .l..':.'.._ :Pit Synchro 6 Report Page 24 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way 4\ t l 4 Lan eGroup,, EBL EBR . NBL'ANB;T SBT -SBR Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util: Factor Frt . Flt Protected • Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd., Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum 'Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS r •+ ��.. 4.0 4.0 . 4:0 4.0 :4:0 `. 4.0:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 :850 `; 0:997 0.950 0.950 1570.. 1404 1612 3223 3494 0.950 0.950 • 1570 1404 1612 3223 165 1.00 172 0.61 15% 282 282 Perm 1.00: 37 0.61 15% 61 61 1.0.0- 152 0 :95; 12% 160 160 Prot 5 3494 4 1.00 .. 1.00 582 1990 0.95' 61.3 2140. 613 2188 0 :93 3% 1..00. 45 0;93` 3% 48.. 0 Interseetion,.Surnrna 7, Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 39 (33 %), Referenced.to phase 2:NBT and 6 :SBT„ Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated - Coordinated 7 7 5 2 6 4:0 4.0' 4.0 4.0 :.4.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 ,20.0. 17.0 .100.0 83:0. '0.0 16.7% 16.7% 14.2% 83.3% 69.2% :16.0 16:0:::. ; 13.0::.96.0 ; .:.79.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 :5 0 :5- Lag Lead Yes :Yes' 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None C -Max C -Max 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11:0, 11.0 .11.0 0 0 0 0 14:0 14.0 13.0 98.0 81.0; 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.82 0.68 0.34 0.91 0.91 0.23 0 :93 52.9 54.6 102.1 2.9 26.4 0.0 3.8 . 0.0 0.0 50.7 52.9 58.4 102.1 2.9 77.1 D E F A E 57.4 23.4 77.1 C: , E 0.0% Start of Green Synchro 6 Report Page 1 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection ;..Signal= Delay;:'62t5! > '; Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.2% Analysis Period (min) 1.5:' Intersection LOS: E ICU Level of Service D Solits and Phases: 20: S 102nd St & E Marginal Wa te02+ . v 07 "..7-4'...:2..-4-11..'-',Z.1.1.' 1 00 1:4; 4.. K `' Jit r:. 1 f.1'St4 ,1`..,.....::,.2.j....:';',',13:`:''-j.1!,:- F. f .4 - f ' • ; '1.0:J l06 4 05 8a71� •k:��.1r..3:14:Ct'i. e+Ai .•16F ;OSYtit..;t 1'1S4'1 .112 M'' : s r..i;Y.4td .s.. .740.:;t:, S.a• P: 17.V i ....f.::,1,,,..:.: 2oti .:1- f . f:TYt .`ql Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips Lane'Group:� EBT EBR W - Mv:-8T' �NBL NOR Lane. Configurations Total. Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt - Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) 'Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group. Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash. Dont Walk (s), Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay 4.0 4:0 4.0 ' 4.0- 4.0 :':. 4;0'';. 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 1.00 0.979. 0:850 0.850 0.992 0.950 3164;.1374 0 4900 4802 1524 0.687 0.950 3164 1374 ,0, "3394 "::._4.802 1524. 52 759 62 1. :00 : :'1:00 - ,1;00 ;:'1:00 ` 1.00 808 846 181 984 465 88 0.94 0.94 0291` 0.91 0:88 0 :88.: 7% 7% 5% 5% 6% 6% 860 , 900 199 .;1081 -528 . 100`. 1001 759 0 1280 528 100 Perm Perm Perm 4 20.0 20.0 50.0% 16.0 3.5 -0:5 4 20.0 20.0 50.0% 16.0 3.5 0,5 8 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0. 20.0. 20.0 20.0 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16,0 !.: 16.0 16.0; , :15.0: 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0:5 0:5 1.0:5 0:5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1 1.0 ` 11:0 11:0 11.0 - 11.0 0 0 0 0 0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.77 0.76 ' .1.10dI 0.27 15.5 7.8 . 28.9 8.6 0.0 .0.0. 0.0 0.0 15.5 7.8 28.9 8.6 B A C A 28.9 8.0 Approach LOS B Inte�sectior urnmary .. 5.0 0. 16.0 0.40 0.15 4.8 0.0` 4.8 Cycle Length: 40 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBL and 6:;,Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio:. 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 17 :3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection:LOS: B;' ICU Level of Service C Synchro 6 Report Page 3 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. Splits and Phases: 80: E Marginal Way S & 16th Ave S 4\4' m2 04 20 08 = '20( y ,s: .. :. •Y ' n'l:' . , .. -I :;f:' . 5: Synchro 6 Report Page 4 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S 1 BL 1NBT.',`WBR NBL` NBT' NBR,, SBL' -:, 4+ 4+ 4.0 4.0. .4:0 :., 4.0 ` 4:0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0910; 0.995 ':1670` 0.984 .1652 100 1.00:, 1..00 100' :`:1:00;, 1:00, 1:00. 1;00 310 11 28 78 0 0 0 0'88,: 078 0 78 ` : 0 78 .:0125 0 25 0.25 5% 3% t 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% 352::: 147 36.: ;100 0,. 0 .0 0 0 150 0 0 Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor F rt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type, Protected Phases Permitted Phases Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct.Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v /c Ratio Control Delay Queue 'Delay Total Delay LOS • Approach Delay Approach LOS. 4.0 0.95 41 4.0 0.95 0.995 0.:34:87' 0.803 0:2814' 1.00. 1:00. 76 625 .0.88: 0.88 3% 3% 86 7.10 0 796 Perm 4.0 0.95 4t 4.0 4;.0 0.95 0.95 0.932 0_ 3204 3204;,. 352 1.00 , 1.00. 1 :00. 0 0 373 0:88. '0.88` : 0.88 3% 5% 5% 0 0 :. ;424 0 0 776 Perm 4 8 ..1900 ' 1.900; Perm; ? Perm 4 8 2., 6.: 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0' 20.0 0.0 .; 20.0 .' 20.0:. 0 0 ; ;. X20 0 :,. 20 0..`" 0!0:: 20:0 - 20.0: 0:0 • 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 16.0 i 1.6.0 ,,,16:0 16:0 160? '160 '16.'.0:::: 164-2S.16:0.': 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 `.0.5. ,,: 0.5 T. 0.5 0:5'; 0.5. 0;5'_ 0 :5', 5.0 .11..0. 0 5.0 11 :0' 0 160 0.40 0 :71 14.4 0.0, 14.4 B 14.4 B' Intersectionl'Summa" t`' " ZRAntil_A17 Cycle Length: 40: Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset: 0 (0 %), Referenced_to phase 2 :NBTL and6 :SBT', Start of -Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Signal Delay::9.8 - Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 5.0 5.0 ,11,0'• 11.0 0 0 16.0 0.40 0.52 6.2 '0.0 6.2 A. 6.2 A 5.0 5.0 110.;_ {110: 0 0 :16.0 0.40 0.21' 4.5 ,0.0. 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 11 :0 11.0' 0 0 `Intersection LOS: A' ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 5 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips Splits and Phases: 153: S Albro PI & Stanley Ave S .4 2Qrs' . `tea ` .. , C. a%Yi.`..r $ .4. y.W9•'l7ffi ii,I 12Ofe i , '.:.!:5:, .Y d• r r. '',f' 4i ''' l£ V> 06 �r m8 -s�'f. • 20 �,..'' 'Y' x'46. F . ,S it ..a. :�..ri5�',i;:'. • ',5:a ..� u ;41 V �{ .ZtAi'` 1 � 4..Y1i ag5.v�ti:...: i . , 2�t$ a R .'s: ♦r' } }''. �..# s .. F. ¢3 cr.LL ! fi t S. .;,{ik . ..?�;e ��`3� l . •�f'i�'Y. Yi. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 157: S Norfolk St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips t 4\ t 4/ F6:'-1� �< ;, :`EBL e =`EBR :' ;NBL; `YNBT =' SBT Lane�.Group� :. , . 1 Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted , Satd. Flow (perm) Headway Factor • Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor -Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 236 0 Sign Control. Stop 4t ft) 1:00 '';1.00 p.95 , ;0.95 0.95 .: 0.95:,. 0.876 0.999 0.996 0:996 1549 0 0 3392 3402 0:996: "' '0'996 1549 0 0 3392 3402 1.00.377 :1.00 1.00: ;:1:00: 1..00 14 149 60 761 718 0.69 0.69 -0.90 -.' 0:90.. ' 0:89 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 20 216 67 846 807 0 913 813 Free Free In te7s2ctlOnlfSUmmary 37 0 1;00 5 089' 6% • Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% Analysis Period (min).15. -` ICU Level of Service B Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips Leta e/,Group Lane Configurations To Lost Time (s)°: Lane Util. Fa ctor I rt Flt Protected Satd Flow.(prdt) = Flt Permitted Sattl:1Flow (pernij Satd. Flow (RTOR) HeadwaywFactor Volume (vph) PheakHouiTactor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases;: Minimum Split (s) Total :Split (s). Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -.Red :Time (s):. Lead /Lag Lead- Lag'Optimize? Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s)- Actuated g/C Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay' Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ,. 4\ t \ EBL FE63T EBR WYBLIWBT+ ,1NBR" NBL i ' NBI Ng-ER 51ZikE7S8TrAfS BR 4 4 0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 ;0.958 0.997 0.950 0 4762: 0' .1649. 0.983 0.764 1737y 0, 1326. 49 1;.00:' '1 00 9 83 42 136 :0:86. 0`86. ,'-.0 86 0 83 3% 3% 3% 4% 97-!, 49'1: 164 0 156 0 113 • Perm 4"' 20.0 20.0 20:A 2.0:0!%: ' 0:0, 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 160„ ::160 .:.., 3.5 3.5 0:5 0.5' Perm +I '1 Ti '14:o . 4 0: 4.0. 4 :0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.850 0.962 0.983 0.950 1706 _ ''1553.. .1770 0.877 0.433 1522 ,1553 .'807 30 1:00.; 1:00' 1.00_ 81 25 50 ": 0.96'; 4% 4% 2% .1;68,, 30 ' '. 52 149 30 52 Perm Perm 8 8" 2.: 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20 :0 .20:0. 20.0''. 20 :0 " 20.0 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 16 :0 16.0 ' 16.0' 16.0 16.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 ,.0.5 .0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.950 3405 0 1736 3471 0 0.284 3405 0 ,519. 3471 0 140 1 1.00. 1:00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 563 192 101 • 528 1 0.96 ' 0.97 0.97 0.97 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 586 200 104 544 1 786 0 104 545 0 Perm 2 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11:0 :' 111 :0' 1-1 :0: 11'.0 ;11:0 0 0 0 0 0 ;16.0 ,16:0 16:0: 16,0; 16:0; 0.40 0.40 0.40. 0.40 0.40 0:21 0:24:: 0 05 0.16. 0:54 9.2 9.4 3.9 9.3 9.1 0.0 0 0 0:0; :: ;0:0 0.0 • 9.2 9.4 3.9 , 9.3 9.1 N ;:.; A A 'A . A 8.8 9.1 ?' t A A 6 6 20.0 20.0 0:0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 16.0 16.0 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 16.0 16.0 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.39 20.7 9.6 00 0.0 20.7 9.6 C A 11.4 B )nt re sect_o•.n' Summary Cycle Length 40 i4 Actuated Cycle Length: 40 Offset,0.0 %) rReferericed°to'phase 2 :NBTL'andf6 :SBTL Start,of:Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control` Type : :Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54 Intersection 'Signal Delay :':9.6': Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.9% Analysis period ,(Min) 15 Intersection LOS: A . ICU Level of Service A Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 161: S Henderson St &.Martin Luther King Jr. Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips Splits and Phases: 161: S Henderson St & Martin Luther King Jr. Way 02 04 20.::'. ... ., r _ ..,,I a.. 20`..s'7..-`.. X :'r:.;;t;,4A ;Y'31 ..... ', II '4" a6 4= 08 20:?;. « :1.v.. : ;-.Y. I' .::_ . J 20:-s -i.1;1 iT.. . "ci __.,. ?':%`i - +1. ... '® Synchro 6 Report Page 9 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 167: S Hardy St & Airport Way S AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips j aneiGrot) ,__: <EBL::EB,R� NBLY1 NBT. °SBT<•°" SBR S Lane Configurations Lane.'Util Factor:, Frt Fit Protected: Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted, Satd. Flow (perm) Headway. Factor Volume (vph) Peak'Hour.Factdr;: Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj;�Flow<(vph) v 1:00 ' :1:00` 0.873 0:997 1590 `0:997' :. 1590 1:00::. 4+ +T. 0.95;; 0:95° .0:95. 0.95 0.993 0:994. 0 3233 3414 0.994:" 0 3233 3414 0 4.00 ' .1,00,!'""1.00: 1 -:00 10 •148 57 423 908 46 0:65 065 :081: •081:. 0:83; 0:83.." 4% 4% ;11% 11% 5% 5% 15;:, 228 :.: 70', :522 : 1094..: :55,- 592 1149 0 ` Free Free Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 0 Sigrr,Control : :. • :Stop r8 •YaWNu` Wl Intersection Summary Control Type: Unsignalized` Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 ' Y �I ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 10 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour AG Site Mitigation 3+AddI trips 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way d Lane Configurations ) r '9 41' 0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 , 4.0 ' Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt - 0.850 . 0968 Flt Protected 0.950 - 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 1509 '11671 '=3343 3328 0 ' ..... - Flt Permitted 0.950 0.134 Satd. Flow (perm) 1687 1509 236 3343 3.328 - 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 154 44 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 i.00 1:00:: Volume (vph) 102 114 7 344 905 245 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74, 0.78 0.78 b.93 - 0.93. .. . Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 8% 8% 5% 5% Adj. Flow (vph) 138 154 9 441 973 ' 263, Lane Group Flow (vph) 138 154 9 441 .1236 0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted :Phases - 4 •2 ' • - , Detector Phases 4 4 5 2 6 Minimum Initial (s) . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:0 . 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) .33.0 33:0 1910 87.0 68.0 0:01. Total Split (%) 27.5% 27.5% 15.8% 72.5% 56.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 29.0 29.0 15.0 83.0 64.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 .0.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? . Yes Yes' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 i 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 9.9 ' ' 9.9 ' 38.2 33.5 32.2 .. , .... , Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.64 0.64 0.62 v/c Ratio 0.43 '0.37,t 0.03 .0.21 0.60'-. Control Delay 22.1 7.4 4.1 4.2 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 pip Total Delay 22.1 7.4 4.1 4.2 8.3 LOS C A ' A . A , A Approach Delay 14.3 4.2 8.3 Approach LOS B A , A IriteRaTt7665SUFrillgr--,44hj Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 52.3 Natural Cycle: 60 . Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60 t70 4 • , • •• . • . 43-48,4,4114fitWaigittA, Synchro 6 Report Page 11 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips Intersection Signal Delay: 8.2 Intersection °Capacity . Uti l ization .46.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: A ICULevel of Service A Splits and Phases: 201: S. Norfolk St. & Airport Way o2 . 04 87 s 4; :' -' a ` '3. , 41Vg '11 le3Rtswesnowinnlso l m6 - 4\ 05 61n15•I?e «4W•.!'Etormem410.7vikmatrotmITailksiiingitalv41 Synchro 6 Report Page 12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 202: S. Ryan Way & AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips 4\ t 1 4' L °ane;Group EBL::` IEBR-,F`s :-NBt . NB,717:L :S1517 _:SBR Lane Configurations Lane Util. Factor Frt 0.850 0.936 Flt Protected 0.950 ;: 0:965 ..., Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1599 0 1780 Flt Permitted . ... 0.950 ., 0.965 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 1599 0 1780 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume (vph) 310 693 264 96 Peak Hour Factor 0.92. 0.92. - ;0 :92 :, 0.92 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% 3% 3% Adj. ..Flow(vph) 337 753 287: ,104 Lane Group Flow (vph) 337 753 0 391 Sign Control Stop • ,Stop 1 ' ntersecfionvSummary3 :: 4 ft* 1.0o ..1.00 :1 :00 ,1.00; ".:0 :95 '0:95 3313 3313 1.00 237 0:92 2% ;258. 448 0 .Stop 0 1.00 • 175 0:92; 2% 190 Control .Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 ICU Level of Service B Synchro 6 Report Page 13 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips lane group `: Lane Configurations Total °Lost -Time •(s) Lane Util. Factor Frt :-•. Flt Protected Satd Flow:(prot) : ~:•EBL . `: EBT . ;'`EBR.. ++ rr ":..40' 4.0 1.00 0.95 0.88 0:850 0.950 ;?:1752:, 2760 1687 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd: Flow- ;(perm) 1752 __; 3505' . ,_2760: 1687: 600 1:00 . 1:00 ;1 00 1,00 359 851 1118.. 322 091 091_ 091 0 :82 3% 3% 3% 7% 395 :J 935 :-1.229 Lane Group Flow (vph) 395 935 1229 393 Turn Type? .:.Prot Perm :..: Prot Protected Phases 3 7 8 Permitted-Phases... Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) r' Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s)., Total Split ( %) MaximurkGreen,;(s); ;53 0 45 0 .;45.0" '24.0 Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time;(s) .', Lead /Lag Lead- Lag = Optimize ?, . . Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode" .Walk Time (s) Flash Dont:Walk'(s)' Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act EffcttGreen (s) ..-•- 55:0' 44:1: Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.35 v/c :Ratio 0:51 ' 0.75' Control Delay 31.1 41.8 Queue Delay 0.0 : -010. Total Delay 31.1 41.8 LOS. C D Approach Delay 34.6 Apl?roach,LOS`-: C. ntersection$Sunmary Cycle Length: 150'` Actuated Cycle Length: 124.8 Natural Cycle Control Type: Semi Act- Uncoord Maximum: v /c: Ratio: h1:20 BL -;' WBT.:-:1NBR NBL - :'NBT BL .;SBTF''3C'SBR +1► 14+ 4 :0,` 4.0 4 :0 4.0 4.0.: 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0 :983 0.941. 0.950 0.950 3316... 0;'1752 3298 0.950 3316 .0: ,1752:' 3298 7 113 1;.00 • 1'00': 1 :00 ' 1.00 179 22 100 502 0 82 .: 0.82 .0:94 0.94 Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak?Hour {Factori Heavy Vehicles (%) A'dc Flow''(vph), .:u 7% '218 245 4 7 3 7 7 8 4 40 40 : >.40 :.4:0. '40; 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 49.0..: 28:0 20:0 38.0% 32.7% 32.7% 18.7% 13.3% 0.0% 160: '. 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 05 Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead .Yes' Yes `!Yes : - Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None, None None None :None 7% 3% .27. 106 0 106 •Prot 2 0.0 44..1, : 24:3 0.35 0.19 0.90: '' 1.20 30.1 158.0 0.0:- +.:0.0 30.1 158.0 F 113.4 0.11 0;68 63.6 0.0 63.6 E; 121.8 F 2 4:0 .4.0 8.0 20.0 29 :0.•°.; 62.0' 19.3% 41.3% :25.0. 58.0 3.5 3.5 0. :5.; 0:5 Lead . Lead Yes. ` Yes 3.0 3.0 None Min 5.0 11.0 0 -12 :7 :. -38:1 0.10 0.31 0.60, .0.81 69.3 41.5 0..0. 0.0 69.3 41.5 E D 44.5 D. +i+ r 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.850 0.950 0 1752 5036 1568 0.950 0 1752 5036 1568 169 1..00 1.00 • 1.00. 1.00 322 32 659 249 0.94 ' 0.91 0.91 0.91 3% 3% 534 343 877 0 3% 3% 3% 35 724 274 35 724 274 Prot . Perm 5 1 5 1 1 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 0:0 11.0 44.0 44.0 0.0% 7.3% 29.3% 29.3% 7.0 40.0 40.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lag Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None Min Min 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 6.6 27.5 27.5 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.39 0.65 0.57 74.9 47.3 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.9 47.3 21.6 E D C 41.4 D Synchro 6 Report Page 14 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Wa Intersection Signal Delay: 48.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82,.2%.,;. Analysis Period (min) 15 AG Site Mitigation 3+AddI trips Intersection LOS: D 101i Level of Service E: Splits and Phases: 203: Boeing Access Rd & Martin Luther King Jr. Wa 4\ 02 4 �l . 4- 04 29 ;::.....,:-:::--.:.';;,,,,Fc'!:[4.4',.f;''.[1:''''',.-•-• ....'i-':::',...1:::.';.i.j:;::',..-..-.:'..-...t...i1:--,' 20s,'',-;',..'.,.....-!.'.4.:[.':-/,:f5Te.....::.=:.:..;...::-:-':.:,,-.-,:_!..w,,..-.,-.:c,A-.......:-::;,.:........':;,:-.,.,-.-;..;--i,..--,-.1-,,,T; o5. l'... o8 11..':k.z...128;.'s•:',:ri';',.:k.-3:.f,-,-;;;41'.;:::149i,,,!...Yr.:',i*;,:-.:.?f,..'.2.*.i.."2:1-;,:::;;.s.:S4i.'......F:':',:'-',.:21:4;i4 ..."7.0" 07 62-n:',W.1.-,.:7?i-11,•'.4.'::-:::::::.;,. LI -:.:2;:;.;li',:• 1(.- Synchro 6 Report Page 15 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 204: S. 112th St. & E Marginal Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips ,L`'aneGroupk +_ -;- ;EBLa Lane Configurations Lari Util::Factor, _ .... Frt 0.898 Flt Protected 0:988'':: <: 0 950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1532 0 1641 Flt Permitted :0:988 0;950: Satd. Flow (perm) 1532 0 1641 Headway Factor 1.00 ,1, 00 1 -00: Volume (vph) Peak .Hour- Factor ..0.84 0.8.4.:,.0 92° Heavy Vehicles ( %) 10% 10% 10% Adj..Flow: (vph)';. '. Lane Group Flow (vph) 370 Sign, Control ,-Stop. ntersectioi ;S irTn5 di Control Type: Unsignalized- Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% Analysis Period (min) 15:;'x; EBR ;: NBL NBT, ::SBT 1718BR• _I 4 1:.00; :::1'.00 1.00,. _ 1s 00 1 ..00 -. 0.989 76 235 158 90' 2801: 172 0 172 1727 1727 1.00 469 0.92. 10% :510 Free 1740 1740 1 ;00 ,1.00 845 76 0.69..: 0.69- 8% 8% :1225 1335 0 Free' ICU Level of Service E Synchro 6 Report Page 16 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips LanewG`roup I`' . Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util: Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot)" Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow: (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases. 8 Detector Phases 8 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 25:0 Total Split ( %) 33.3% 0.0% 41.7% Maximum Green.(s) 16'.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.6 Lead /Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0. 11,0.'. Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) . 0 0 Act Effct.Green-(s) 6.8 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.45 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.84 Control Delay 9.5 28.4 Queue Delay 0.0 ' 0.0 Total Delay 9.5 28.4 LOS Approach Delay 9.5 28.4 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary. Y Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 50.8 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 T \ tWBL . WB BT NBR B' arge roil 1. t ti .. 40; 4.0 40 • 40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.872 0.998 0.998 1653.. 0' "1740: 0.998 1653 .0 1740 138 2 1.00 " 1.00 '1.0o 1.00 1.00. '.1.:00: 5 105 556 9 313 755 0.76 0:76 0:85 0.85 0 :89 0% 0% 9% 9% 8% 8% 7 138 654 11 352., 848"' 145 0 665 0 352 848 40;:40: 1.00 1.00 0.950 1671° 1759` 0.950 0 1671 1759). Prot 2 1 8.0 20.0 0.0 15.0 40.0 0.0% 25.0% 66.7% 11.0 „.:` - 36•0. 3.5 3.5 0.5 Lead Ye's 3.0 3.0 N'orie Miri` 5.0 1:1.0. ;1 ' 0 11. :0 38.8-`.. 0.22 0.76 0.97 . 0 :63,. 66.0 7.1 0.0 0.0.. 66.0 7.1 ...E 24.4 raft'"- .. `' t.l''Ki A*1- ”A,.'?''. r. Synchro 6 Report Page 17 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 205: S. 115th St. & E Marginal Way AG Site Mitigation 3+Addl trips Intersection Signal Delay: 24.6 Intersection'-:Capacity,Utiliiation 63 9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICUIL001:of Service B S lits and Phases: 205: S. 115th St. & E Mar inal Wa 01 125 i ,., -, v y,•::,:.: :?::::;:.::i'-':::i-,,.../.‘,:'.'.."-,' .,`.i.: ' ' 40;i141:t:;4'-'66.S,,1:..•,-,‘:,;.;kr::: .::.:..:!`. `....:i 1 20'i Synchro 6 Report Page 18 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Wa AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips t T / \ j. 4/ 126-n oupt„� a} f;, ;EBL;",. : :EBT-., :EBR, V1BL Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ++ r 4.0 4.0 4.0 :4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.850 0.950 3335 0.950 3335 1:00 256 0:84 0.950 3438 1538 1687 0.950 3438 1538 11687 2 ,1.00. 1..00, 499 11 5% 5% 5% 305 594 13 305 594 13 301 795 Prof. , :'custom.:' Split 2 3 2,.. • 2 2 2 2 3 3 4.0 4.0? 4 0 4.0 '4,0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 8.0 31.0 >31 :0 • , 310 s:. 40.0 40:0 20.7% 20.7% 20.7% 26.7% 26.7% 27.0 27.0 27:9 ` .36.0 36.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5, 0.5 0.5 0:5 0.5 Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min . Min , Min None None 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0. 1.1.0 11:0 0 0 0 27.0 27.0. .27 .0 ' ' 36.0 " 36.0 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.51 0.96' 0 :05 0.74 0:98 58.9 87.9 46.1 65.2 83.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.9 87.9 46.1 65.2 83.6 E F . : D E .. F. 77.6 61.6 NBT" 'NBR'_ SBL SBT,-:; SBR r t+ r rr •:4.0 4.0, 4.0. 4.0 4,0 4.0 4 :0 :4:0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88' 0.850 , 0:850 0.850 0.998 0.950 3374, 1509 0 _ :3188 :' :1429; 3273 1776 2656 0.705 0.950 3374 1509x.. 0:.2252.:'1429; :.3273::1776 2656 1.00 1.00 274 723 0 :91 0 :91' 7% 7% 301,. ' 795. Inte esetio:n•:Sumrrary _` -7.a: Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03. 303 1.00, 276 5 148 7% 13% 13% 303,', 303 0 170 Free... Perh1,: Free .1 1 1 1 4 4 12 .7 4.0...: 40:: 4 :0 4.0.... 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 :'22 0;. 22:0 22A0=° 57 0'; 57 0 53.0 0.0% 14.7 %0 14.7% 14.7% 38.0% 38.0% 35.3% ,180;. 18.0, - 180'.: 530 530:::. 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0,5_ .;_ 0 ?5: 0 :5 0;5' Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Yes' Yes', '.Yes Yes:. Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min Mln .: Min . None None 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 110 110: 110`_ 11:0` 11:0 0 0 0 0 0 1'5010:: 18.0: 180' 53.0 53 1.00 0.12 0.12 0.35 0.35 020; 063',. :073 067 :: 0.3 74.1 15.4 44.6 90.1 0.0, 0.0' ;00`" 0:0' 0;0 0.3 74.1 15.4 44.6. 90.1 A E: B ": D F, 34.8 51.9 346 863 1:00' 1:00. ,1 :,00 311 653 542 1192 0:84 13% 7% 7% 7% 346,. 777 64.5. :1419 346. 777 645 1419 Prof Splits: custom 4 4 12 49:0 0.33 0:98 38.5 0:0 38.5 D Synchro 6 Report Page 19 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way Intersection Signal Delay: 56.9 IntersectionfCapacity Utilization.75'.9 %: Analysis Period (min) 15 AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips Intersection LOS: E ICU Level;of Service .D Splits and Phases: 240: Boeing Access Rd. & E Marginal Way 01 02 7. 03 Synchro 6 Report Page 20 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips LaneFGroup Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) 4.0 1.00 0.87,8 0.950 1787 1652 0.728 1370 1652 110 1.00 1.00. 208 91 0.87 ' '0; 87 1% 1% 239 105 Lane Group Flow (vph) 239 556 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 Permitted :Phases :.= 4. Detector Phases 4 4 Minimum Initial (s) '" 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 Total.Split.(s) 27.0. 27 :0 Total Split ( %) 33.8% 33.8% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 Lead /Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time (s) 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.58 Control Delay 30.4 Queue Delay 0.0. Total Delay 30.4 LOS C Approach Delay Approach LOS 3.0 None 5.0 11.0 0 23.1 0.30 0.97 55.5 0:0 55.5 E' 48.0 D EBR . °WB.L .WBT. 4.0 ;, "4.0 ' 4.0> 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,.0:883:. 0.950 0 1671 1° °553' 0.174 0 306 ' 1'553 • 0 35 1:00 '1.00: 1:00: `'. :1:00: :1 00 392 238 8 0,:87 0.77 ....0.77 1% 8% 8% 451 309 10 0 309 45 Perm k 4\ t ,► 1 4/ +t 4.0; 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.982_ 0.950 4703, 0.950 1.703 .3344 28 -1.90 27 43 648 0 77 -: 0 '95. 995. 8% 6% 6% 35 45 682 0 45 776 Prot 5 8 8- 8 8 4.0 ;'4.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 : , 27 0 : :27.0 0.0% 33.8% 33.8% 23.0 23.0 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 3.0 3.0 None : None 5.0 5.0 11.0 ` 11:0 0 0 "23.-1 ':: 23.1 0.30 0.30 3.36 0.09 1103.5 10.3 0.0' 0.0 1103.5 10.3 F. B. 964.5 F 0:0 0.0% 5 8.0 20.0 8:0. x459 0:0 10.0% 56.3% 0.0% 4 0 4.1.0 3.5 3.5 05;. '0.5. Lag Lag Yes Yes • 3.0 3.0 None:.: Min 5.0 _11.0.` 0 0 41..:1 0.05 0.54 '0:53 0.43 60.8 11.8 60.8 11.8 B 14.5 B 4:0, 4:0 4.0 49 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 ...0998 0.950 1752 _3498;; 0.950 0 ' 1752 '3498 3 x.1.00 89 .42 2010 33 0.5_,:.;.0.96,; 0 96' :0:96 6% 3% 3% 3% 94 44 2094_ 34 0 44 2128 0 Prot . 1 6 6 4.0 :'40 8.0 20.0 :8:0: , 45;0 , 00 10.0% 56.3% 0.0% '''"419', 3.5 3.5 0.5; Q`5 Lead Lead Yes es: 3.0 3.0 :None . Min .' 5.0 1:1 :0 0 41:A 0.05 0.54 57.6 0:0` 57.6 • E.; F:: 88.4 89.0 0:0 89.0 1ntersection�Surrarnary� Cycle .Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 76.8 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Semi Act - Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 3.36 Synchro 6 Report Page 21 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips Intersection Signal Delay: 140.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 1087 %'' Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: F ICU pLevel of ,Service G Splits and Phases: 253: S. 112th St. & Tukwila Intl. Blvd. y m1 f o2 -4 04 BiS ~I; .1'45` "s , `'a. ?t¢; j;":4 .: .a^r" ..;:.: ,. r ,,.y;'; s I',:_','- 27S;:. ... :. ''l C': v:i l06 4\ 05 V 08 45 -s ... :e-r {: ^}:.t• ":"i 'x- , y„ . :. i' '<r._. I 8:s'j'j • 27`s.,; ., ,I , t Synchro 6 Report Page 22 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way AG Site Mitigation 3 +AddI trips f C 4\ t P `► 1 4/ `EBTAIEBR W13,41E 1,B 40.13 -R, NBQati 61T NB.R SBL °;ffi:S-.By ET:8BR Lane Group ; b's F :Ro Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) .4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd.'Flow (perm): Satd. Flow (RTOR) Headway Factor Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles ( %) Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) ` Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split ( %) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls ( # /hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue.Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS • • 4.0" 40: <.40 '4.0 401; 40. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 • 0.888' 0.950 1641 1534' 0.713 1232 1534 11 1 :00 '1.00 16 13 0:87. :0.87:' 10% 10% •18 15 18 60 Perm 0888 0.950 1687 :1577 0.718 1275 1577 51 1 :00., 11 0.63 1.00 .1.00. 39 115 0.87 0.63 10% 7% .45:183. 0 183 Perm 4 .; 8 4 4 8 8 4 :0 4:0 .4:0 :4:0. 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0. 20.0. . 0.0 20.0.: „ 20.0 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 16.0 160 160 ;-.16:0• 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4:0;... 4:0: 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 6990: 0.950 1612 ;3191 0.111 0.999 0.950 11p6*-- :. 3468 0.388 188::319.11 0;: 709 3468 22 2 11001 1 00: ';1::00, 1.00 too' 1:00 -1:00 32 5 544 39 85 1835 14 0:90. 0:90. • 0 :91 . 010 0:91' 7% 7% 12% 12% 12% .4% 4% 4% 17, . 51 :' 6 604' :: 43 : 93; 201:6: • 15 68 0 6 647 0 93 2031 ;Perm. Perms: 3.0 None 5.0 1,1.0 0 12.3 0.20 0:07 17.6 0.0 17.6 B 3.0 None: 5.0 11.0 0 12.3. 0.20 0.19 16.6 0.8. 17.4 17.4 • 2 6 2 2 6 4:0 4:0. :4:0'.. 4:0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 0'0 .:40:6. ;.. 40:6 :: 0 :0.... 40:0. 40..0 : 0.0 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 36.0 36 0 ;. ,. ' 36;0 36:,0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0 5• •05 . 0 :5' 0 :5'. 3.0 3.0 None. '-None 5.0 5.0 11.0 •,: :11;,0: :. 0 0 12 :5 : 12.5 0.21 0.21 0.69 0.18 35.0 9.2 :58.2 :: 0,0` 93.2 9.2 F 70.5 3.0 3.0 Max::G Max. 5.0 5.0 0 ". 42 :4'- 0.71 0.71 0:05: • O 29' "' 5.2 4.4 o:0''; 5.2 4.4 4.4 A 3.0 3.0 Max _C Max, 5.0 5.0 •11 ::0: 1 10..:'... 0 0 42:4' . 42:4 0.71 0.71 .019 : 0'83 6.3 14.4 OA'. 97 6.3 24.1 A; C 23.3 G Intersection s.un1 arya .. tw• , a r ±rt, Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 56 (93 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SB;TL, Start of' Green: _. 'G Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type:. Actuated- Coordinated r n. w�3 Synchro 6 Report Page 23 Mirai Associates, Inc. Tukwila 2013 PM Peak Hour 254:.S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way f ' .1 AG Site Mitigation 3 +Addl trips Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 23';0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% Analysis P...eriod (min) 15 :' Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service D Splits and Phases: 254: S. Norfolk St. & E Marginal Way Synchro 6 Report Page 24 Mirai Associates, Inc. 02 . —'► 04 40 1-i' , . C..:?;:i.;. ` ` ;-,'x ..,.... .. :: .. e. -I:.. 20a:•'._. :..,. , :17:,,:,.:::::1!:!,:: 06 $ 08 4 0:$ ¢:z;:.: _:ex,: ,' :,.'1 t., *::;:°d_} ,, ai.r• iii;'ik%-.".C:ti. x3 , +ir: I r 112CiiStt ik .. .1.1.1i :'I--' -:r.;.i Synchro 6 Report Page 24 Mirai Associates, Inc. Distribution of2013 PM Peak 1 Hour Trips from AG Development 2013 Tukwila B3 Scenario 212:2013PM3HR with new AG Trips 092707nj 2007 -10 -12 17:46 (Jane) • Department of Transportation P.O. Box 80245 7277 Perimeter Road South Seattle, WA 98108 -0245 206 - 296 -7380 206- 296 -0190 Fax TTY Relay: 711 September 10, 2007 Rebecca Fox Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 �.C;Vi :V illy: ry '.)EVELONEad1' Reference: Project File L06 -066 and L07 -067 — Mikel Hanson/Sabey Corporation Application for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning change Dear Ms. Fox: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Mikel Hanson/Sabey Corporation application for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning change for the Associated Grocers and adjacent properties. The property is directly south and adjacent the King County International Airport (KCIA). Airports are defined in the Growth Management Act as "essential public facilities" and encroachment by non - compatible land uses are an issue of County and State concern. The Washington State Aviation Division has additional information at: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/aviation/Planning/LandUseCompProg.httn. KCIA is a Class II Commercial Service non -hub airport which has nearly 300,000 annual aircraft operations. KCIA is the test airport for The Boeing Company and the Military Flight Center, as well as serving as the delivery center for the Boeing 737 aircraft. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning change needs to be reflective of the operational, safety, and risk issues associated with development of property adjacent to an airport. The proposed development is in the approach path of the main runway and the congregation of people and buildings should be located away from the approach. In addition, building height limitations should be applied to ensure the safety of aircraft in flight. KCIA has provided the City the Airport Layout Plan to assist with these issues. In addition, the City and applicant may wish to review FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300 -13, Airport Design in establishing any site limitations. We would also suggest that the plans be reviewed by the FAA for any further potential limitations. Development landscaping presents a significant concern. Landscaping should not be selected that will grow to a height which could become an obstruction to navigation. In addition, landscaping should not attract wildlife, especially bird populations which would also present a . ®1202M Rebecca Fox Page 2- September 10, 2007 hazard to aircraft. FAA Advisory Circularl50 /5200 -33A, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near Airports should help in guiding the plan. Both advisory circulars can be accessed on the internet at http : / /www.faa.gov /aru /150acs.efm ?ARPnav =acs. Finally, the site is located in the Airport's Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility mitigation area. The site is in the 65 and 70 DNL Noise Contour. The proposed development does not meet any federal or local criteria for assistance with noise mitigation. The City will need to apply its own standard for noise mitigation. King County International Airport looks forward to working with the City and Mikel Hanson/Sabey Corporation throughout the development of this project: If you have need additional information, please call. Sincerely, Gary Molyneaux, Manager Airport Planning ,$c Program Development cc: Robert I. Burke, AAE, Airport Director Phone • (541) 687 -0051 FAX • (541) 344 -0562 info@eugene.econw.com ECONorthwest ECONOMICS • FINANCE • PLANNING Suite 400 99 W. 10th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97401 -3001 Other Offices Portland • (503) 222 -6060 Seattle • (206) 622 -2403 August 9, 2007 TO: Mikel Hansen FROM: Terry Moore, Bob Parker, and Beth Goodman SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE AT THE GROCERS SITE SUMMARY Sabey Corporation is submitting an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change on the 64 -acre Associated Grocers site. The analysis in this memorandum supports that application by addressing specific questions that the City has raised about the proposed changes: This section (two pages) summarizes our answer to those questions; the memorandum that follows this summary provides supporting data and analysis. CONTEXT The subject property is in Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). Its plan designation and zoning is MIC/H (Heavy Industrial). Sabey Corporation is requesting a change to Light Industrial (LI), which would allow for the development of office, commercial, and retail space as well as other light industrial uses. Sabey Corporation is planning to develop the property for office, retail, and light industrial. The City of Tukwila is concerned that the type of development proposed for the subject property could (1) discourage or be incompatible with existing uses in the MIC, (2) increase pressure for conversions from heavy industrial to commercial land, (3) decrease the amount of land available for industrial growth, and (4) compete or take market share for retail and commercial developments in Tukwila's Urban Center. IMPACTS TO INDUSTRIAL LAND 1. Will the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment significantly impact future industrial development on parcels near the subject property in the MIC? No. The majority of land near the subject property is already being used for commercial or light industrial uses. 2. Will the proposed uses on the subject property be compatible with existing and expected industrial uses in the MIC? Yes. Regional trends and local forecasts indicate that manufacturing employment is growing slowly or decreasing. Official regional, long- term employment forecasts suggest the majority of employment that Tukwila can expect RECrrt15D GAUL 13 2007 Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment . August 9, 2007 Page 2 in the future is Professional and Business Services and other types of employment that use office space. Boeing Field and Boeing properties separate the subject property from the heaviest industrial uses in the MIC. 3. Is granting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment likely to increase demand for conversion from industrial to commercial uses on areas adjacent to the subject property? Maybe, especially .south of the subject site. That land is currently being used, however, for commercial and light industrial purposes. The pressure for conversion of this land to commercial uses is more likely to be affected by regional land prices for industrial land and employment trends than changes to the subject property. 4. Does the proposed development negatively impact the City's policy to have adequate land for industrial growth? Yes and no. Changing the zoning on the proposed development clearly reduces the amount of land for some industrial uses (the property is roughly 4% of the industrial land in Tukwila), and allows the option to develop more of the land for office and retail uses. But the market trends have been clear for a while: land on and around the subject property is not being used much by heavy industry, and the subject property is now used for light industrial and commercial purposes. There is .a reasonable, but not definitive, argument that the change in designation will have little impact on the long -run viability of industrial uses in Tukwila given market forces and the way the MIC/H zone is defined and implemented. IMPACTS TO THE URBAN CENTER 1. How will the uses on the subject site be similar and different from the uses in the Tukwila Urban Center? The uses in the Tukwila Urban Center include a regional mall, high- density residential development, and a large mixed -use development. The uses on the subject site will be a smaller -scale mixture of retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Most of the uses will primarily serve people working on or near the site, visitors wanting to stay near Sea -Tac International Airport, and people living relatively near the subject site. 2. To what extent will the commercial and retail uses in the proposed:development compete with commercial and retail uses in the Tukwila Urban Center and other developments within the City? There is no question that the proposed uses will compete with development in other areas of Tukwila: that is the nature of all types of development, and especially retail. The broader question is whether enough demand exists to support all of the existing and proposed developments in Tukwila, including development on the subject property. PSRC forecasts strong employment growth in Tukwila for sectors that use office space. Population growth, coupled with increases in disposable income, will create demand for additional retail space. 3. What is the market area for the proposed development compared to the Tukwila Urban Center? The development concept includes two primary uses: employment (office and some industrial) and retail. The employment uses will draw workers from throughout the region. The retail uses will draw from a smaller market area. Since the mix of retailers is not yet specified, we cannot say definitively exactly what the market area will be. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 3 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Sabey Corporation contracted with ECONorthwest to analyze the impacts of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change on the 64 -acre Associated Grocers distribution site, located in north Tukwila and south Seattle. The subject property is located in Tukwila's Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC) The Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC) is an area designated in Tukwila's comprehensive plan as a manufacturing center. It includes land zoned for Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy Industrial (MIC/H) and Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light Industrial (MIC/L). The subject property is zoned MIC/H. Figure 1 shows that the-subject property is located between Airport Way, Norfolk Road, East Marginal Way, the Duwamish River and the Boeing Access Road. The property is separated from other properties in the MIC-by these roads, except along the northwestern edge of the property, which is adjacent to a credit union. • Figure 1.- Subject property and immediate transportation access • I.1i11 (zotioI'.' 1 Ole I 11:11 ion Source: Johnson Gardner memorandum "Draft Economic and Market Trends Shaping Industrial Land Need in the Duwamish Corridor," May 10, 2007 Fifty -five acres of the 64 -acre site are occupied by the Associated Grocers headquarters and distribution facility, a light - industrial use that has existed in the heavy- industry zone for the past Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 4 50 years. Associated Grocers is considering changing the location of its facility; it is unclear whether they will continue using the site for more than two to four years. Sabey Corporation is seeking a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change on the property to bring the zoning in line with historical and likely future uses. The current plan designation is for heavy industrial uses MIC/H on the portion of the site in Tukwila and IG2 on the portion of the site in Seattle). Sabey Corporation is requesting a change in plan designation= and zoning to Light Industrial, LI. The purposes and uses permitted in these zones are described in Tukwila's zoning ordinance: • Manufacturing/Industrial Center Heavy (MIC/H) District "...is intended to provide a major employment area containing heavy or bulk manufacturing and industrial uses, distributive and light manufacturing and industrial uses, and other uses that support those industries. This district's uses and standards are intended to enhance the redevelopment of the Duwamish Corridor." The district allows a wide range of uses and building types: manufacturing, heavy -metal processing, rock crushing and asphalt or concrete manufacturing, offices associated with permitted uses, warehouse and distribution facilities, storage facilities, hotels and motels, and restaurants. • Light Industrial (LI) District "...is intended to provide areas characterized by distributive and light manufacturing uses, with supportive commercial and office uses." The district allows a wide range of uses and building types: manufacturing (similar to manufacturing permitted in MIC/H), many types of office, medical and dental laboratories and offices, retail sales, warehouse and distribution facilities, storage facilities, hotels and motels, and restaurants. Sabey Corporation is considering redeveloping the site for commercial and light- industrial uses. Table 1 shows Sabey Corporation's concept of the possible uses on the site. The majority of the uses would be office and retail, with a small amount of other commercial and light - industrial uses. Although the Sabey Corporation does not have definite plans for the components of the development, it hopes to develop a mixed -use center that provides opportunities for working, recreation and socialization, and shopping in the same area. The development is likely to be pedestrian- oriented and incorporate open space. The site is currently served by bus and. SoundTransit may develop the proposed light rail and commuter train station at the Boeing . Access Road. Plans to develop this station have been deferred by Sound Transit until financing is available for the station. Table 1. Conceptual development types on the Associated Grocers site Possible Use Office Retail Light Industrial Hotel Theatre Total Est. Size (Square feet) Percent 700,000 47% 550,000 37% 100,000 7% 80,000 5% 60,000 4% 1,490,000 100% Source: Sabey Corporation model of possible uses Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment. August 9, 2007 Page 5 Previous studies documented regional economic trends in support of the proposed amendments.' A Johnson Gardner study made the following findings about regional economic trends: • The subject property has unique qualities that support the change in uses, including the site's size, visibility, multiple modes of access, nearby industries, and the potential for growth in King County. • Growth in manufacturing, particularly heavy - industrial activity, will be stagnant over the medium- and long -term periods in King County and the Puget Sound region. • The combination of increasing costs of industrial land and outflow of traditional heavy industry create disadvantages for future use of the subject property by a new manufacturer or other firm that needs traditional industrial. space. • Forecasts and plans by the State of Washington, the Puget Sound Regional Council, and the Prosperity Partnership expect heavy industry to continue to be important to the regional economy but expect a long -term decline in heavy manufacturing and are planning to encourage growth in technical and scientific industries. • The current zoning of the property (MIC/H) creates barriers to redeveloping the subject property for uses compatible with the expected regional growth in high -tech, scientific, research, and commercial services industries. PURPOSE OF THE MEMORANDUM This memorandum provides supporting documentation to Sabey Corporation's application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change on the subject property. It addresses specific questions pertaining to the potential impacts of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and zoning change on the subject site. In short, the purpose of this memorandum is to describe local industrial, commercial, and retail land -use trends that affect future uses of the site, and how (and whether) the Comprehensive Plan Amendment would impact the city's planning efforts. The City of Tukwila is concerned about the impact of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on existing industrial land and existing and planned commercial uses within its city limits. The City is especially interested in the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments on the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC) and the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC), as well as strategies to mitigate any potential impacts. Specifically, the City is concerned about: • How the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment may impact industrial land near the subject property in the MIC • Whether the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment may encourage other property owners to apply for conversion of industrial land to commercial land • Compatibility between the proposed uses on the subject property and uses on surrounding industrial lands I Johnson Gardner memorandum "Draft Economic and Market Trends Shaping Industrial Land Need in the Duwamish Corridor," May 10, 2007 Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 6 • How the potential commercial development on the subject site will effect other commercial uses in Tukwila ORGANIZATION OF THE MEMORANDUM The remainder of the memorandum is organized as follows: • Framework for evaluation summarizes the procedures and criteria for amending Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code that are addressed in this memorandum. • Analysis provides answers for each of the questions presented in the Framework section. SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION Sabey Corporation has applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on the subject property. Tukwila has procedures and criteria for amending its comprehensive plan and Zoning Code, which note that "The burden of proof to demonstrate that a change to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Code is warranted lies solely upon the proponent."2 An application to amend Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan must address the criteria specified by the City in its "Application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment." This memorandum is not the Sabey Corporation's application, which is being submitted separately and addresses all of the criteria. Rather, this memorandum supports that application by addressing in more detail the following criteria for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment: • Explain why the proposed change,is the best means for meeting identified public need and describe other options for meeting the public need. • Explain why the proposed change will result in a net benefit to the community or the type of benefit that can be expected. • Describe the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change. • Explain why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are defective or should not continue in effect. • Describe how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Planning Policies. • Describe what changes would be required in the Zoning Code. In addition to requesting a change in the Comprehensive Plan, Sabey Corporation will also need to request a change to Tukwila's Zoning Code. An application to amend Tukwila's Zoning Code must address criteria presented in the application for a Zoning Code Amendment. This memorandum addresses the following criteria for the Zoning Code Amendment: • Show that the proposed amendment to the zoning map is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. 2 From the City of Tukwila "Comprehensive Plan Amendments" application. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 7 • Show that the proposed amendment to the zoning map is consistent with the scope and purpose of this title and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for. • Demonstrate that there are changed conditions since the previous zoning became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to the zoning map. • Describe how the proposed amendment to the zoning map will be in the interest of furthering public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare, and will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood, nor be injurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subject property is located. In meetings between staff at the Sabey Corporation and the City prior to the submission of the Sabey Corporation's application, City staff identified several concerns regarding the impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This memorandum addresses concerns the City raised about the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. • What are the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on industrial land in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center? This section will address the affect that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment may have on industrial land in the MIC, including compatibility issues and increases in pressure to convert land from industrial to commercial uses. It will discuss possible strategies for mitigating these impacts. • What are the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on uses in Tukwila's Urban Center? This section will address the impact of the proposed amendment and development on existing commercial and retail uses in Tukwila's Urban Center. It will discuss possible strategies for mitigating these impacts. The analysis section of this memorandum addresses these broad questions, and several related ones. ANALYSIS ECO staff worked with City staff to understand the key issues and analysis required to support the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. This section provides analysis of the two broad questions posed above. The analysis is separated into two parts: impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on industrial; and impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on other commercial uses in Tukwila. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ON INDUSTRIAL LAND IN THE MANUFACTURING/INDUSTRIAL CENTER The City of Tukwila is concerned about the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on industrial land in the City's Manufacturing/Industrial Center (MIC). The City's questions are: 1. Will the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment significantly impact future industrial development on parcels near the subject property in the MIC? Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 8 2. Will the proposed uses on the subject property be compatible with existing and expected industrial uses in the MIC? 3. Is granting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment likely to increase demand for conversion from industrial to commercial uses on areas adjacent to the subject property? 4. Does the proposed development negatively impact the City's policy to have adequate land for industrial growth? 5. How can the impacts of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be mitigated? The following analysis addresses these questions. The conclusions at the end of this section provides answers to the questions. Industrial land availability in Tukwila Table 2 shows land uses in Tukwila by plan designation and zoning. The City has designated 1,436 acres —more than one - quarter of the City's land —for industrial uses; 1,168 -acres are in the MIC/H zone. An additional 753 acres (14% of the City's land) is in zones that allow a mixture of commercial and industrial uses, and 1,144- acres (21% of the City's land) are in commercial zones. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment would change 64 acres of MIC/H land to LI. The City only has 20 acres currently in the LI zone. Table 2. Land by zoning district, gross acres, Tukwila, 2007 Zane Acres Percent Industrial 1,436 27% Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy Industrial (MIC /H) 1,168 22% Heavy Industrial (HI) 144 3% Manufacturing Industrial Center /Light Industrial (MIC /L) 105 2% Light Industrial (LI) 20 0% Mixed Commercial and Industrial 753 14% Commercial Light Industrial (C/LI) 472 9% Tukwila Valley South (TVS) 281 5% Commercial 1,144 21% Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) 853 16% Regional Commercial (RC) 80 1% Regional Commercial Mixed Use (RCM) 77 1% Office (0) 53 1% Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) 52 1% Mixed Use Office (MOU) 21 0% Residential Commercial Center (RCC) 8 0% Residential 2,049 38% Low Density Residential (LDR) 1,797 33% High Density Residential (HDR) 161 3% Medium Density Residential (MDR) 91 2% Total 5,383 100% Source: City of Tukwila, 2007 Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 9 Table 3 shows the distribution of land uses within the Manufacturing/Industrial Center in Tukwila in 2005, the City's key industrial zone. The majority of the land (913 acres) is developed. Other uses include the King County International Airport (175 acres) and vacant land (134 acres). The subject property is 64 acres and represents about 5% of the land within the MIC. Table 3. Land uses in the Manufacturing and Industrial Center, Tukwila, 2005 Acres Percent Developed Land . 913 72% Airport 175 14% Vacant Land 134 11% Water 34 3% • Right -of -Way 16 1% Total 1,272 100% Source: Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, 2005 and Tukwila City staff, 2007 According to Tukwila City staff, vacant land is defined a s land having an improvement value of less than $5,000. Table 4 shows the distribution of employment for firms located in the Manufacturing/Industrial Center in 2005. About 85% of the more than 18,000 employees in the Center were employed by firms needing industrial land, including processing firms (including manufacturing) and wholesale firms. Table 4. Employment in the Manufacturing and Industrial Center, Tukwila, 2005 Employees Percent Processing 13,845 76% Professional Office 1,887 10% Wholesale 1,644 9% Other 453 2% Retail 362 2% Total 18,191 100% Source: Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, 2005 In 2007, Associated Grocers employed about 750 people at the subject property, approximately 4% of the employment in the Center. About 400 of the jobs (53 %) of the jobs were in distribution and 350 of the jobs (47 %) were office- related. These categories of employment do not precisely match the categories presented in Table 4. The distribution employees are probably covered under "Wholesale" in Table 4 and the office- related employees are probably accounted for in "Professional Office in Table 4. The data presented in this section suggest that the proposed change in plan designation on the subject property would affect about 6% of the land area and about 4% of the employment in the MIC. The amount of land zoned in the City Light Industrial (LI) would increase from 20- acres to 84- acres. Granting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment would result in a change in the composition of economic activity on the site, possibly increasing economic activity on the subject property. The Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 10 existing use of the subject property is light industrial and commercial in nature, and has no heavy industrial component. Sabey Corporation is proposing to increase the share of office and retail jobs and decrease the share of light industrial employment. Assuming the subject site is developed as proposed by Sabey Corporation in Table 1, the subject property may have 2,500 or more employees, more than three - quarters of which would be office jobs.3 Changes in employment and demand for industrial land A key question is how the Comprehensive Plan Amendment will affect employment and demand for industrial land. External but important to this question are regional employment trends that will shape demand for land and built space in the MIC/H zone. The Johnson Gardner memorandum documents the projected change in payroll employment in King County. It states that the Washington Employment Security Department projected that the sectors that will add the most employment in King County over the next ten -years are industries that traditionally use office space. These industries are expected to account for nearly 69% of new job growth in the County. Professional and Business Services are expected to lead job growth and Manufacturing firms are expected to account for only 2% of new jobs. Table 5 shows the Washington Employment Security Department projection of job growth in Manufacturing industries for the 2004 to 2014 period. The industries that are projected to add the most jobs are Aerospace (3,000 new jobs), Nonmetallic Mineral Products (1,300 new jobs), and Food Manufacturing (1,200 new jobs). The industries that are projected to loose the most jobs are Printing and Related Support ( -700 jobs) and Paper and Paper Products ( -200 jobs). 3 The estimate of 2,500 employees is based on the amount of space by type that the Sabey Corporation is considering building on the subject property (shown Table 1) and the employment densities presented on page 45 of the Puget Sound Regional Council's document "Industrial Land Supply and Demand in the Central Puget Sound Region." Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 11 Table 5. Manufacturing employment forecast, King County, 2004 -2014 Industry Manufacturing Durable Goods Aerospace Nonmetallic Mineral Products Wood Products Machinery Fabricated Metal Products Electrical Equipment and Appliances Misc. Manufacturing Computer and Electronic Products Furniture & Related Prod. Primary Metals Other Transportation Equipment Non Durable Goods Food Manufacturing Chemicals Petroleum & Coal Prod. Plastics & Rubber Prod. Textile & Apparel Paper & Paper Prod. Printing & Related Support Estimated Employment 2004 2009 2014 103,500 115,000 76,700 37,300 3,100 1,300 5,200 6,100 1,700 5,500 9,100 2,600 900 3,900 26,800 12,200 1,800 200 3,100 2,200 2,000 5,300 87,600 45,000 4,000 1,800 5,700 6,700 1,900 5,500 9,400 2,700 900 4,000 27,400 13,000 2,000 200 3,100 2,400 1,800 4,900 110,400 83,200 40,300 4,400 1,800 5,700 6,500 2,000 5,800 9,300 2,800 800 3,800 27,200 13,400 2,000 200 3,100 2,100 1,800 4,600 Change 2004 to 2014 Number Percent AAGR 6,900 7% 0.6% 6,500 8% 0.8% 3,000 8% 0.8% 1,300 42% 3.6% 500 38% 3.3% 500 10% 0.9% 400 7% 0.6% 300 18% 1.6% 300 5% 0.5% 200 2% 0.2% 200 8% 0.7% -100 -11% -1.2 %- -100 -3% -0.3% 400 1% 0.1% 1,200 10% 0.9% 200 11% 1.1% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% -100 -5% -0.5% -200 -10% -1.0% -700 -13% -1.4% Source: Washington Employment Security Department The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) projects employment for small areas in the Puget Sound Region. Table 6 shows the PSRC's long -term forecast for employment in the Tukwila Forecast Analysis Zones (FAZ) for the 2000 to 2040 period. The PSRC projects that the Tukwila FAZs will add about 27,500 jobs over the 40 -year period. The forecast shows that the majority of new jobs will be in Services, including Finance and Insurance and Real Estate. Employment in Manufacturing is forecast to decline by more than 3,600 jobs. Employment in Wholesale Trade, Transportation Services, Communications, and Utilities (WTCU) is forecast to grow by more than 1,800 jobs. Some or most of the employment growth in WTCU sectors will choose to locate on industrial land. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 12 Table 6. Employment forecast, Tukwila FAZs, 2000 -2040 Total MFG WTCU Retail FIRES Gov /ED Emp. 2000 2040 Change Number Percent 11,369 6,302 11,226 13,113 2,278 44,288 7,761 8,147 12,460 41,267 2,199 71,834 -3,608 1,845 1,234 28,154 -79 27,546 . -32% 29% 11% 215% -3% 62% Source: Puget Sound Regional Council Notes: The PSRC uses Census tracts as the geographic basis of the Forecast Analysis Zones (FAZ). The Census tracts do not generally follow political boundaries. As a result, the forecast in Table 6 may include areas outside of Tukwila and /or may exclude areas inside the city limits. Table 6 includes the South Tukwila and North Tukwila/Riverton FAZs MFG is manufacturing WTCU includes wholesale trade, transportation services, communications, and utilities FIRES includes finance and insurance, real estate, and services _ Gov /ED includes govemment and education The predicted employment shifts are already beginning to take place. According to Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, Boeing controls 750 acres within the Manufacturing/Industrial Center. With the move of their corporate headquarters out the region, Boeing is in the process of converting its facilities into an aerospace research and development engineering campus, including office, laboratory, and manufacturing space. According to staff with the City of Tukwila, Boeing's current activities within the MIC are predominantly light industrial in nature, including manufacturing airplane components from carbon fiber, assembling plane parts that were manufactured elsewhere, and software development for research and development. Boeing is likely to have low to moderate growth on its land within the MIC. The PSRC employment forecasts suggest that employment in manufacturing in Tukwila will decrease throughout the 2000 -2040 planning horizon. The MIC/H zone primarily targets manufacturing. Declining manufacturing employment strongly suggests declining demand for land and built space. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment recognizes these trends and would provide land for the office and retail sectors where PSRC projects most of the employment growth will occur. Potential impacts of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment on land near the subject property in the MIC The subject property is located on the eastern edge of the MIC. It is bounded by East Marginal Way S and the Duwamish River on the west, Norfolk Road and Boeing Field on the north, Airport Way on the east, and the Boeing Access Road to the south. The property is located near the southern edge of properties zoned MIC/H, and the freeway borders the property to the east. The only parcel that the subject site is directly adjacent to is a credit union, to the north. Other surrounding uses include Boeing facilities, a restaurant, and the Museum of Flight. Existing uses near the subject property are light industrial and commercial in nature, rather than heavy industrial. Thus, several conditions suggest that the change in, use at the subject property would not necessarily cause other properties in the MIC area to become less desirable for the kinds of uses allowed in the MIC: • The subject property is at the edge of the MIC, not in the center Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 13 • The subject property is bounded mainly by roads, which reduce direct impacts on surrounding property. Where it touches other parcels, the uses are already commercial (a credit union, a restaurant , and the Museum of Flight), not industrial. • Independent of the MIC/H designation, the de facto land uses in the MIC/H area would be better characterized as Light Industrial, and would not conflict with-LI uses. The majority of the current uses on land within the MIC can be described as light industrial, as defined in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. There is comparatively little heavy industrial activity on land in the MIC in Tukwila. The closest large -scale heavy industrial activity is Delta Marine, a ship building firm located along the west side of Duwamish River outside of Tukwila. • - Boeing controls most of the land in the MIC/H (approximately 750 acres) and, thus, largely has control of its own destiny. Boeing's use of its facilities within the MIC have changed substantially over the past fifteen years. It has already shifted most of its properties to the Light Industrial end of allowable uses in the MIC/H. It may choose to continue that trend, but it is unlikely to be forced in that direction by a rezoning of the subject property to LI. Its current uses are not only compatible with but may be possibly enhanced by the type of development proposed on the subject site. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the subject property is a symptom of the increasing importance of services that require office space, such as Professional and Technical Services, in the regional and local economy. Granting the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on the subject property will not change long -term decline in the demand for heavy - industrial uses, employment, and land. Denying the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment, however, could result in the long -term underutilization or even disuse (if Associated Grocers relocates) of the subject property. A key concern of the City is whether this Comprehensive Plan Amendment will lead to other proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments in the MIC/H resulting in a "domino" effect in the area. Our evaluation is that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment on the subject site will not itself, result in such an effect. First, the site is relatively isolated from other sites in the area. Second, the development concept would support many existing uses in the area. Third, while manufacturing employment is projected to decline, there will still be a projected 7,800 manufacturing jobs in the Tukwila area in 2040. However, if the PSRC's employment forecast for the Tukwila FAZs is correct, the trends towards decreasing manufacturing employment may result in lower demand for industrial land and an increase in the pressure to convert heavy industrial land to light industrial or commercial uses. According to the PRCS's forecast Tukwila will experience changes in the composition of its workforce, most notably a decrease in manufacturing employment. The result of this change may be a decrease in the demand for industrial land, especially heavy industrial land. Change of employment and land uses in the MIC The shift from heavy industrial uses to light industrial and commercial uses in the portion of the MIC near the subject site, including Boeing's land, has already occurred without Comprehensive Plan Amendments. The regional employment trends discussed above and in the Johnson Gardner study describe trends away from heavy industrial employment in the region and in Tukwila. The types of firms that are most likely to be attracted to the region require commercial office or Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 14 campus -style development, including high -tech, scientific, research, and other "creative" industries. Aside from the subject property, the non - Boeing land that is most likely to be under pressure to convert from heavy industrial to commercial uses are the parcels south of the subject site, east of the Duwamish River between Tukwila International. Boulevard, East Marginal Way South, and Interstate 5. The existing uses on these sites are largely commercial in nature, including office buildings and a hotel. It may be that allowing the subject property to convert from a designation of heavy industrial to light industrial will increase pressure on these parcels to convert to commercial uses. On the other hand, some of the existing uses are commercial. Allowing the conversion of the subject property may create an opportunity to develop a commercial and light industrial gateway into Tukwila, encouraging redevelopment of existing commercial and industrial uses. Mitigating the impacts of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment One of the City's concerns is the conversion of industrial land to commercial uses. We have noted that broader forces than local zoning are driving such conversions. The state projects that future employment growth in Manufacturing — especially heavy manufacturing —will be stagnant and that the majority of employment growth will be in Services —especially Professional and Business Services. The PSRC's forecast of employment in Tukwila shows that these trends are expected to impact Tukwila. Thus, two reinforcing economic factors are reinforcing changes in local land markets: • Manufacturing is growing slowly if at all. And the growth that is occurring is looking more and more like the kinds of activities that would be called Light Industrial: flex - space in business parks that mix office and manufacturing / assembly uses. •. Professional services are growing rapidly. Those uses need office space. Office space can be stacked, so it can have more employment density. It does not conflict with surrounding amenity (like industrial uses can): it seeks surrounding amenity (especially professional and retail services). It can afford to pay two, three, or four times as much for land as manufacturing and warehousing, which are land intensive. The result is that in metropolitan areas around the country, former industrial land near rejuvenating downtowns is converting to commercial uses. It is not that manufacturing would not like to have that land —it would. Rather, it is that it cannot afford to pay the prices that commercial uses can pay and still be profitable. Manufacturing moves farther out, abetted by cheaper . land that is still well served by highways. If future Comprehensive Plan Amendments are a concern to the City, the City can slow the conversion of land in the MIC to light industrial and commercial uses by identifying the key industrial sites and adopting more aggressive policies to preserve these sites. CONCLUSION: IMPACTS TO INDUSTRIAL LAND 1. Will the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment significantly impact future industrial development on parcels near the subject property in the MIC? No. The Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 15 majority of land near the subject property is already being used for commercial or light industrial uses. 2. Will the proposed uses on the subject property be compatible with existing and expected industrial uses in the MIC? Yes. Regional trends and local forecasts indicate that manufacturing employment is growing slowly or decreasing. Official regional, long- term employment forecasts suggest the majority of employment that Tukwila can expect in the future is Professional and Business Services and other types of employment that use office space: Boeing Field and Boeing properties separate the subject property from the heaviest industrial uses in the MIC. 3. Is granting the Comprehensive Plan Amendment likely to increase demand for conversion from industrial to commercial uses on areas adjacent to the subject property? Maybe, especially south of the subject site. That land is currently being used, however, for commercial and light industrial purposes. The pressure for conversion of this land to commercial uses is more likely to be affected by regional land prices for industrial and employment trends than changes to the subject property. 4. Does the proposed development negatively impact the City's policy to have adequate land for industrial growth? Yes and no. Changing the zoning on the proposed development clearly reduces the amount of land for some industrial uses (the property is roughly 4% of the industrial land in Tukwila), and allows the option to develop more of the land for office and retail uses. But the market trends have been clear for a while: land on and around the subject property is not being used much by heavy industry, and the subject property is now used for light industrial and commercial purposes. There is a reasonable, but not definitive, argument that the change in designation will have little impact on the long -run viability of industrial uses in Tukwila . given market forces and the way the MIC/H zone is defined and implemented. POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ON USES IN TUKWILA'S URBAN CENTER The City of Tukwila is concerned about the potential impacts of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment on existing commercial uses in the City's Urban Center. The City staff asked ECO to address the following questions: 1. How will the uses on the subject site be similar and different from the uses in the Tukwila Urban Center? 2. To what extent.will the commercial and retail uses in the proposed development compete with commercial and retail uses in the Tukwila Urban Center and other developments within the City? 3. What is the market area for the proposed development compared to the Tukwila Urban Center. Proposed uses compared to other commercial uses in Tukwila The Comprehensive Plan Amendment proposes a mix of uses for the subject property: • 700,000 square feet of office development Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 16 • 550,000 square feet of retail development, plus an 80,000 square foot hotel and a 60,000 square foot theater • 100,000 square feet of light- industrial development These uses amount to approximately 1.49 million square feet of built space on the site. A key question is: To what extent will the conceptual mix of uses compete with other commercial centers in Tukwila? In other words, the City's concern is whether the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment would draw demand for development in other areas of Tukwila to the subject property. Such an outcome could be inconsistent with several of the City's ongoing planning efforts. Tukwila's Urban Center has more than 850 acres. Some of the development efforts going on in Tukwila's Urban Center include: • The Southcenter Mall, which has 1.3 million square feet of occupied retail space and is completing a 400,000 square foot addition, which is 95% leased. In addition, the former Mervyn's site is being redeveloped, adding 50,000 square feet to create a site with 100,000 square feet of retail space. Southcenter Mall is a regional retail center that attracts .shoppers from around the region and as far away as Alaska. • The South Center Square, which is a new retail development south of the Southcenter Mall with big box development and smaller stores. Its 200,000 square feet of retail space is 90% leased. South Center Square will provide additional regional draw that complements the existing retail development at Southcenter Mall. • Residential development in Tukwila Urban Center, which will include high- density, multi - family residential developments of up to five stories over ground floor retail on the eastern edge of the Urban Center. Three- hundred condominiums are already being developed. The residential development will change the uses in Tukwila's Urban Center from an entirely retail and commercial area to more of a mixed -use area. Table 7 presents an estimate of need for commercial and industrial built space based on the PRCS's forecast for employment in the Tukwila area for 2000 to 2040.4 Table 7 shows that the Tukwila area will need the most built space (9 million square feet) for Finance and Insurance, Real Estate, and other Services. Employment in these sectors requires office space. Tukwila will have a need for about 2.2 million square feet of additional retail space. As a regional center for retail, Tukwila is likely to have additional demand for retail space because people from the Seattle region (and further) come to Tukwila to shop. Tukwila is likely to have demand for about 1.6 million square feet of built space for the Warehousing, Transportation, Communications, and Utilities sectors. These sectors typically require industrial land. Table 7 shows the demand for built space for Manufacturing decreasing by about 2.1 million square feet and Government and Education decreasing slightly. 4 The estimate is based the employment densities presented on page 45 of the Puget Sound Regional Council's document "Industrial Land Supply and Demand in the Central Puget Sound Region." The estimates for need for built space were developed by multiplying the change in employment by the number of square feet needed per employee by each type of employment. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 17 Table 7. Estimated need for commercial and industrial built space to accommodate new employment, Tukwila area, 2000 to 2040 Type of Needed space employment (square feet) FIRES 9,150,050 Retail 2,149,628 WTCU 1,610,685 Gov /Ed (25,675) Manufacturing (2,117,896) Total 14,441,512 Source: PSRC Employment Forecast, 2000 to 2040; Metro "Puget Sound Regional Council's document "Industrial Land Supply and Demand in the Central Puget Sound Region "; ECONorthwest Comparison of the market area of the proposed use and other commercial development A "primary market area" is generally considered the area in which most of the demand (typically around 70 %) for a product will originate. The extent of a market area for retail businesses depends on the products or services they offer and the location of competing businesses. People will not typically drive past one convenience store to get to a similar store in a different area, but they will travel farther for a special service or niche product that cannot be easily obtained elsewhere. Thus, the primary market area for a convenience store is the surrounding neighborhood, while the primary market area for a specialty retailer can extend for miles and could include the entire metropolitan Seattle region. In a downtown area it is common to see retail businesses that sell a wide variety of products and services that have local or regional market areas, depending on the type of product sold and the location and quality of competitive businesses offering the same product. Tukwila already understands the regional nature of its retail market area: Tukwila is a retail destination for much of the Seattle metropolitan area, due to the concentration of retail in Southern Tukwila, especially Westfield's Southcenter Mall, which is the largest indoor mall in Washington State and attracts over 11 million visitors each year. The market area includes not only the residents of Tukwila, therefore, but also residents of the Seattle metropolitan area and beyond. The question for the City of Tukwila is how having a secondary retail location north of the Southcenter area would compete with other developments within the City. This section addresses that question. In Tukwila, the subject property would compete primarily with the Southcenter Mall and South Center Square. Regionally, the site would also compete with other commercial areas in the Seattle area that are either in the planning stages or have already developed. Because Tukwila has much faster north -south traffic flows than east -west traffic flows, the area of competition extends farther to the north and south than it does to the east and west. Areas of potential competition include: Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 18 • The Landing (2 miles from Tukwila). The Landing is a mixed -use development under development in Renton, south of Lake Washington. When completed in 2008, The Landing will include about 600,000 square feet of retail space and 990 residential units. • Kent Station (6 miles from Tukwila). Kent Station, developed in 2005 -2006, includes 470,000 square feet of office, retail, entertainment, and education space and a 30,000 square foot civic plaza. • Factoria Mall (8 miles from Tukwila). Factoria Mall, approximately 510,000 square feet of retail space, is planning the Factoria Town Square addition to add 685 housing units and 151,000 square feet of retail space. • Downtown Seattle (10 miles from Tukwila). The downtown has extensive office and retail space including City Centre, Pacific Place, and Westlake Center. • Bellevue Square (14 miles from Tukwila). The Bellevue Square Mall is upgrading to include 2,500,000 square feet of hotel, office, and retail space; it currently is 1,300,000 square feet. The Bellevue is a 130,000 square foot high -end retail development currently being constructed next door. • Bellevue Place (14 miles from Tukwila). Bellevue Place has 500,000 square feet of office, retail, restaurant, and hotel space, and is currently constructing a 351 -room addition to the hotel. • Lincoln Square (14 miles from Tukwila). Lincoln Square is a 1.4 million square foot office, retail (310,000 square feet), hotel, and 148 -room residential tower development currently expanding to include a 525,000 square foot office tower to house the corporate headquarters of Eddie Bower. • The Bravern (14 miles from Tukwila). The Bravern is a 1,600,000 square foot development in Bellevue that will include retail, office, and condominiums, scheduled to open in .2009. • Bellevue Crossroads (15 miles from Tukwila). Bellevue Crossroads is a 550,000 square foot retail development in East Bellevue. It is likely that the subject property will attract a market primarily made up of light industrial and office employees, rather than the larger metropolitan market captured by the Southcenter retail cluster. ECONorthwest's report "Tukwila Urban Center Market Analysis" (2002) forecast demand for built space in Tukwila's Urban Center to 2020. The report focused on demand for built space in Tukwila's Urban Center, not the entire City of Tukwila. The report forecast the following demand for the types of space: • Retail. The report forecast demand for between 1.5 million square feet to 3.8 million square feet of additional retail in Tukwila by 2020. The report said that demand for retail space in Tukwila would depend on three future conditions: (1) population in the retail market area, (2) consumer spending trends, and (3) the degree to which the Tukwila Urban Center maintains its market share of regional retail demand. The report said that regional competition could result in a decrease in demand for retail space in the Tukwila Urban Center. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 19 • Office. The report forecast demand for about 1 million square feet of office space in Tukwila's Urban Center by 2020. At the time the report was written, the central Puget Sound market area had suffered setbacks in demand for office space.5 • Light Industrial and Warehouse. The report forecast need for approximately 600,000 square feet of new light industrial and warehouse space in Tukwila to 2020. This estimate is dependent on the availability of light industrial land and the extent to which higher - value retail uses compete for available land in the Urban Center. Since the completion of this report in 2002, Tukwila and surrounding cities have experienced retail and commercial development, as well as substantial residential development. Tukwila's Urban Center has continued to be a regional retail draw because (1) the economy has been relatively good, and (2) property owners and developers, such as Westfield, have invested in new development in the Urban Center. Tukwila's Urban Center is still among the strongest regional retail centers but that other retail developments (Renton, Seattle, Bellevue, and elsewhere) keep adding competing retail. Overall, retail development on the subject property and other retail development in progress in Tukwila will almost certainly increase retail sales in Tukwila as a whole. How that increase gets distributed within Tukwila's subareas is complex. In theory, changes in retail activity in Tukwila could be explained through competition and market capacity, which might show economic activity in Tukwila's Urban Center decreasing, or through market synergies and complements, which might show economic activity in Tukwila's Urban Center increasing. Whether retail sales in Tukwila's Urban Center will be the same, greater, or less than they would have been in the absence of Tukwila South or the development of the subject property is a question beyond the scope of this analysis. Notwithstanding these caveats, the type and scope of retail development at the subject property will certainly not be the cause of a collapse at Tukwila Urban Center, but it will probably compete with Tukwila's Urban Center for some business. Role of the proposed development in the community The Associated Grocers site will play a very different role in the community than does the Southcenter/ Tukwila Urban Center area. The Southcenter area has been nationally marketed as a retail destination; it receives over 11 million visitors every year. It is located at a highly - trafficked interstate intersection, and is near to the Sea -Tac International Airport. Southcenter is known for its shopping, restaurants, and is beginning to develop nearby high- density multi- family residential development as well. The proposed zone change would result in intensification of employment on the subject site and creation of an employment center, and to a lesser extent, a retail center. The majority of the Associated Grocers site is proposed office and light industrial space, and the retail and hotel space will complement that development, but not create a new retail destination for the larger metropolitan market that comes to Southcenter. Because of the scale of the proposed retail uses, 5 Since the completion of this report, demand for office space in the Puget Sound Region has increased. According to C.B. Richard Ellis, the Regional office vacancy rate in second quarter 2007 was 10.5 %, down from approximately 17% in second quarter 2003. The second quarter 2007 vacancy rate in downtown Seattle was 8.6% and 5.1% in Bellevue's central business district. Sabey Corporation Comprehensive Plan Amendment August 9, 2007 Page 20 the primary market area would be much smaller than those of Southcenter and the Tukwila Urban Center. Given the amount of employment in the area, demand would primarily come from workers in the district. The Associated Grocers site is likely to form a type of transition or buffer zone between the heavy industrial land uses in northern Tukwila and the residential and retail areas in central and southern Tukwila. The light industrial and office uses can buffer the existing residential area from industrial uses, and the commercial and entertainment uses can attract residents on evenings and weekends to an area of the city that is primarily occupied during daytime hours. The commercial and entertainment uses will act as a gateway to the residential part of Tukwila, but the development includes no residential units. CONCLUSION: IMPACTS TO THE URBAN CENTER 1. How will the uses on the subject site be similar and different from the uses in the Tukwila Urban Center? The uses in the Tukwila Urban Center include a regional mall, high- density residential development, and a large mixed -use development. The uses on the subject site will be a smaller -scale mixture of retail, commercial, and light industrial uses. Most of the uses will primarily serve people working on or near the site, visitors wanting to stay near Sea -Tac International Airport, and people living relatively near the subject site. 2. To what extent will the commercial and retail uses in the proposed development compete with commercial and retail uses in the Tukwila Urban Center and other developments within the City? There is no question that the proposed uses will compete with development in other areas of Tukwila: that is the nature of all types of development, and especially retail. The broader question is whether enough demand exists to support all of the existing and proposed developments in Tukwila, including development on the subject property. PSRC forecasts strong employment growth in Tukwila for sectors that use office space. Population growth, coupled with increases in disposable income, will create demand for additional retail space. The retail development at the subject property is one - quarter of the size of the development proposed in Tukwila South, which means that it will.compete less both in scale, type, and proximity with the Tukwila Urban Center. 3. What is the market area for the proposed development compared to the Tukwila Urban Center? The development concept includes two primary uses: employment (office and some industrial) and retail. The employment uses will draw workers from throughout the region. The retail uses will draw from a smaller market area. Since the mix of retailers is not yet specified, we cannot say definitively exactly what the market area will be. IMirai 1 Transportation Planning En®Inaaring MEMORANDUM To: Jim Morrow, Tukwila Public Works Director Cyndy Knighton, Tukwila Senior Transportation Engineer From: Tom Noguchi, Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering Subject: A Summary of Traffic Analysis Related to the AG Site Redevelopment Proposal Date: September 23, 2005 Introduction The City of Tukwila requested Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering (Mirai) to analyze the traffic impacts of the proposed development at the site currently occupied by Associated Grocers (AG). The study assumed that the proposed redevelopment at the AG site would be completed by 2013. Mirai used the City's 2013 travel demand model developed for the concurrency analysis and calculated intersection levels of service with Synchro. The City of Seattle/ City of Tukwila city limit dissects the proposed redevelopment of the AG site. Mirai contacted the City of Seattle Department of Planning and Development (DPD) staff when this study was initiated. The Seattle DPD staff provided input throughout the study period on such issues as identifying study intersections within Seattle, reviewing trip generation and level of service analysis. This memorandum summarizes the 2013 traffic conditions for the streets and intersections in the vicinity of the AG site with and without the AG site redevelopment proposal. The 2013 traffic conditions include the traffic volumes estimated from potential developments that have not yet been developed at the Boeing sites along the E Marginal Way S corridor in the Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC). AG Site Redevelopment Scenario and Trip Estimation This study assumed that the AG site would be redeveloped with the following land uses and building floor areas: • Light Industrial: 100,000 gross square feet • Office: 700,000 gross square feet • Restaurants: 30,000 gross square feet Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 1 7 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering • Movie Theater: 60,000 gross square feet • Retail: 550,000 gross square feet • Hotel: 80,000 gross square feet (149 rooms) Mirai estimated the net trips generated by the proposed redevelopment based on these land uses. The existing land use generates a total of 878 vehicles trips during the PM peak hour and the proposed redevelopment would generate an estimated total of 2,315 trips. Thus, the proposed redevelopment would generate an additional 1,437 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. Additional Trips by Potential Boeing Developments The 1997 EIS for future Boeing developments in the MIC assessed the traffic impacts of the developments on the transportation system. The EIS forecast traffic volumes for 2010 based on these potential developments. Mirai estimated the unused travel demand in 2007 that was forecast in the 1997 EIS based on the actual Boeing employment and its employee travel data. The unused trips by Boeing were estimated as follows: • Boeing employees in Duwamish area in 1997: 17,000 • Employees to be added by 2007 (the 1997 EIS): 10,000 • Total forecast Boeing employees in 2007: 27,000 (17,000 +10,000) • Actual Boeing employees in Duwamish area in 2007: 11,924 • Percent employee commuting in vehicles: 73% of total employees • Percent employee commuting during the PM peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 pm): 14% of total employees • Estimated trips to be made during the PM peak hour, if 27,000 employees were present in 2007: 2,732 trips (27,000 * 0.73 * 0.14) • Actual trips made during the PM peak hour in 2007 based on the existing employees: 1,207 trips (11,924 * 0.73 * 0.14) • The unused Boeing trips: 1,525 trips (2,732- 1,207) Mirai estimated that Boeing has not used a total of 1,525 PM peak hour trips. These unused trips were added to the 2013 traffic forecast. These trips were distributed from Site 1, Site 2 and Site 3 as shown in the 1997 EIS. Please note that the allocation of trips to these sites have not been reviewed nor coordinated with Boeing. It is possible that the development plan included in the 1997 EIS may have been changed. Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 2 IM i ra i 1 1 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service The City provided the 2007 traffic counts for the study intersections. Figure 1 shows the PM peak hour intersection levels of service and delay in the study intersections in 2007. Based on the City's 2013 travel demand model, the levels of service were calculated for the intersections in the study area with the unused Boeing trips shown in Figure 2. The levels of service shown in Figure 2 assumed that the signals on East Marginal Way S would be optimized. While the S 112th Street /E Marginal Way and S 112th Street/Pacific Highway S intersections would operate at LOS F, all other study area intersections would operate at LOS E or better. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service with AG Site Redevelopment Scenario The projected net traffic volumes described above were added to the 2013 conditions with the traffic volumes adjusted for the unused travel demand from Boeing in the MIC area. Mirai found that signal optimization would significantly improve levels of service at the intersections in 2013 to accommodate the traffic growth in the future. Figure 3 shows the 2013 PM peak hour levels service and delay at the intersections within the study area with the redevelopment at the AG site. To calculate the levels of service, the following assumptions were made: • The primary access to the AG redevelopment site would have a new signalized intersection on E Marginal Way S located south of the S 102nd Street/ E Marginal Way intersection. • Two additional secondary access intersections would be added on S Norfolk Street and Airport Way S. At least one of these access intersections would be required to have a signal. • The three signals at S Norfolk Street, S 102nd Street and the new main AG site entrance /exit on E Marginal Way S would be coordinated and the signal operation would be optimized. This would improve the levels of service to LOS D and LOS E at S Norfolk Street and S 102nd Street, respectively. The intersection at the AG site main access location would operate at LOS D. Conclusions While mitigating actions will be required, the intersections impacted by the proposed redevelopment at the AG site would operate at LOS E or better, except for the intersections of S 112th Street /E Marginal Way and S 112th Street/Pacific Highway S. These intersections are projected to operate at LOS F, if the currently unused travel demand by the future Boeing developments along S 112th Street (as described in the 1997 EIS) were realized in 2013, without redevelopment at the AG Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 3 • • M i r a i l 1 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering site. Any additional traffic from the redevelopment at the AG site would increase delay at these intersections. Among the six intersections evaluated in this study within the City of Seattle, one unsignalized intersection at S Ryan Way/ 51st Avenue S would operate at LOS F when the unused Boeing trips are added in 2013. The delay at this intersection would further increase with additional the trips for the AG site redevelopment. All other intersections evaluated in Seattle would operate at LOS D or better in 2013 when the trips for the future Boeing and AG site redevelopments were added. Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 4 • Figure 1. 2007 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay Mirai Treneportetlon Planning s Engineering 1 Henderson St Legend 12, Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 5 • I M i r a i l 1 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering Figure 2. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay with Unused Trips from Potential Boeing Developments et toe S Hari c VJ Legend es O r9i ay 14 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 12 Delay in Seconds 12 Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds * Delay too high to be calculated by Synchro 1 t \\ 19 25 1125 7 S Norfolk St It Henderson St r S Norfolk St___.. c wil Z� <c° S Ryan`t'N North 0 m Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 6 • I M i r a i l 1 Transportation Planning 6 Engineering Figure 3. 2013 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service and Delay with Unused Trips from Potential Boeing Developments and Redevelopment at the AG Site North 0 Legend Unsignalized Intersection e12 Level of Service (LOS) Delay in Seconds Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 12 Delay in Seconds * Delay too high to be calculated by Synchro Mitigation Option C. Offset AG Site Access Intersection and Coordinate Signal at Norfolk, 102nd and AG Access. Qm m \� Boeing A\acess R�' w \\ co. \\ \\ N \\ Traffic Analysis with Proposed AG Site Redevelopment Page 7