Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E07-017 - CLEMENT MARK / BOEING - BUILDING #2-45 DEMOLITION / NEW 38 PARKING STALLSBOEING PLANT 2 DEMOLITION OF BUILDING #2 -45 & REPLACE WITH PARKING SPACES 7775 EAST MARGINAL WAY S. E07 -017 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director November 13, 2007 NOTICE OF DECISION To: The Boeing Company, Applicant Mark Clement, Contact The Boeing Company, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter serves a notice of decision that application number E07 -017 is designated as a Planned Action and is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: E07 -017 Planned Action APPLICANT: The Boeing Company REQUEST: Approval for designation of a Planned Action for demolition of an existing building and subsequent construction on the site of 38 parking spaces. LOCATION: 7775 East Marginal Way South PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposal is to demolish a two -story, 21,648 square foot building, and replace it with 38 new parking stalls. The building proposed for demolition is referred to as 2 -45, located at 7775 East Marginal Way South on the Boeing Plant 2 site. The demolition project area is part of a much larger site, a portion of which is within the shoreline zone. However, the specific project area for this proposal is beyond 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark, and is therefore not located within the shoreline zone. DETERMINATION: Project is designated as a planned action. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MIC/H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter JR H:\Planned Action SEPAWOD_2 -45 Building.doc Page 1 of 2 11/09/2007 4:55:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670. • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • Boulevard; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM and 5:00 PM. The project planner is Jaimie Reavis who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3659 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. J 3 k Pace of Tukwila DCD Director SEPA Responsible Official JR Page 2 of 2 11/09/2007 4:55:00 PM H:\Planned Action SEPA\NOD_2 -45 Building.doc • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster; Director MEMORANDUM November 13, 2007 To: Jack Pace, DCD Director From: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Re: Project File No. E07 -017: Boeing Plant 2 Demolition of Building 2 -45 and Replacement with 38 Parking Spaces Project Description: The project proposal is to demolish a two - story, 21,648 square foot building, and replace it with 38 new parking stalls. The building proposed for demolition is referred to as 2 -45, located at 7775 East Marginal Way South on the Boeing Plant 2 site. The demolition project area is part of a much larger site, a portion of which is within the shoreline zone. However, the specific project area for this proposal is beyond 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark, and is therefore not located within the shoreline zone. Proponent: Mark Clement, Permit Administrator, The Boeing Company Location: 7775 East Marginal Way Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: Washington State Department of Ecology Zoning: MIC /H Comprehensive Plan Designation: MIC/H Recommendation: The current proposal fits within the scope of a SEPA Planned Action according to the criteria set forth in TMC 21.04.152. The proposal is recommended for approval as a SEPA Planned Action. JR Page 1 of 5 H:\Planned Action SEPA\E07 -017_Boeing Building 2 -45_Staff Report.doc 11/13/2007 9:00 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 I. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL Tukwila's Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) is one of the Puget Sound region's major industrial centers. Industrial development over most of the sub -area was evaluated in multi -site environmental review. In 1992, a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared for the Duwamish Corridor master plan, a proposal to redevelop Boeing properties in the MIC over a 10 year period. In 1998, sub -area plan/EIS updates extended the previous analysis of the corridor's Boeing properties (about 650 acres) to the entire MIC sub- area (about 1,370 acres). As part of this Planned Action review for the current proposal, the impacts of the current proposal are compared to 1998 Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated. The current proposal is to demolish a 21,648 building located at 7775 East Marginal Way South, and replace the building with 38 new parking spaces, as well as associated landscaping and pedestrian features. The subject site is developed as an aircraft manufacturing facility with a number of separate buildings. The building to be demolished is beyond 200 feet from the shoreline of the Duwamish River. The subject site is zoned Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H). Several Planned Action determinations have been issued previously for demolitions on the site. The following is a list of these projects and their associated file numbers: • Building 2 -64: a 5,100 square foot building on the subject site. Decision issued on September 12, 2006. Refer to file number D06 -016. • Building 2 -62: a 41,000 square foot building. Decision issued on October 2, 2003. Refer to file number E03 -024. • Buildings 2 -63 and 2 -65: Decision issued on October 8, 2001. Refer to file number E01 -025. • Building 2 -66: Decision issued on December 14, 2000. Refer to File number E2000- 030. • Buildings 2 -50, 2 -71, and 2 -72: Decision issued on March 8, 2000. Refer to File number E99 -0035. II. DECISION CRITERIA This proposal was identified as a potential Planned Action because of its location within the subarea subject to the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA JR Page2of5 H:U'lanned Action SEPA\E07 -017_Boeing Building 2-05_Staff Report.doc 11/132007 9:00 AM Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The determination of whether a project fits the Planned Action criteria is divided into two phases. Each phase is described below, including a response that explains how the current proposal meets the criteria. 1) In the first phase, a determination is made whether the project satisfies all of the following characteristics (contained in TMC 21.04.152 Planned Actions Identified): 1. The action is a `permitted use" located within the MIC /L (TMC 18.36.020) and MIC /H (TMC 18.38.020) zones and/or is an accessory use (TMC 18.36.030 and 18.38.030 respectively). 2. The action is: .a. not an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 and TMC 18.06.270, b. not a conditional or unclassified use, in. the respective MIC /L or MIC /H zones, c. not a development, any portion of which includes shoreline - modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark, d not a development associated with 16th Avenue Bridge construction activities. Response: The proposal for this site is for demolition of an existing structure and construction of 38 new parking spaces. Since the area on which the existing building is located . is a portion of a larger site, the parking as proposed is an accessory use within the MIC/H zoning district. Additionally, the project is consistent with items a -d under number 2 above. 2) Once the project has met the initial test to qualify as a planned action, it must then show the following: A. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. Response: Based on the answers provided in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Screening Checklist, the project does not constitute a "take" under ESA. The following provides clarification for items answered "yes" in the ESA Screening Checklist. Compliance with existing codes will mitigate any impacts related to grading, stormwater, and hazardous substances. JR . _ Page 3 of 5 H :\Planned Action SEPA\E07 -017_Boeing Building 2- 45_Staff Report.doc 11/13/2007 9:00 AM (1) Grading and clearing —The project includes grading and clearing associated with construction of the parking area. The only plant materials on the site that will be disturbed by this activity is landscaping, which will be replaced in -kind. (2) Processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances — Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any applicable permits from the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for impacts related to emissions into the air. Soil on the project site is not known to be contaminated. To ensure that soil excavated from the site does not pose a hazard, the applicant shall properly store, sample, and disposed of excavated material according to state and federal laws. Other hazardous waste associated with the existing building, including leaded equipment, fluorescent light tubes and mercury switches /thermostats, broken lamps and mercury- contaminated sink traps shall be disposed of or managed per state and federal requirements. (3) Regular use of fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides —Use of fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides shall meet all state and federal requirements regarding runoff and contamination of soil. (4) Construction of new impervious surfaces — Construction of new impervious surfaces includes the use of new concrete pavement for parking surfaces and new concrete sidewalks along the southwest side of the project site. This new impervious surface replaces areas of the site which were previously impervious, resulting in no net increase in the amount of impervious surface on the project site. The . total amount of impervious surface as proposed will actually be reduced from the previous amount as a result of this project through the addition of approximately 1,300 square feet of new grass sod to replace areas that were previously impervious surface. (5) Generation of stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site — Stormwater management shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. B. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? TMC 21.04.154 requires that the Comprehensive Plan policies that are to be reviewed are those identified in the "Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and JR Page 4 of 5 11/13/2007 9:00 AM H:\Planned Action SEPA\E07 -017_Boeing Building 2 -05_Staff Report.doc • Environmental Impact Statement for the Tukwila Manufacturing /Industrial Center." Specifically, the proposed project meets the following goals and policies: Goal 11.1: Support the existing industrial activities in the MIC and development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people to Tukwila in the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods. Policy 11.1.1: Support the efforts ofexisting industries to expand and new industrial businesses to develop in the Manufacturing /Industrial Center by providing them with economic data, information on available development sites, help in understanding and getting through the permit processes, and other appropriate assistance. Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry, including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while prohibiting unrelated uses. III. CONCLUSION The current proposal to demolish the 2 -45 building and replace this area of the site with 38 new parking spaces is consistent with the criteria for approval as a Planned Action. The proposed use of the site as a parking area is an accessory use in the MIC/H zone, and satisfies all other criteria contained in TMC 21.04.152 regarding the proposed use of the site. Proposed actions associated with the proposal are consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, and all impacts associated with the current proposal will be mitigated. Prepared by: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Date: November 13, 2007 JR Page 5 of 5 H:\Planned Action SEPA\E07 -017_Boeing Building 2- 45_Staff Report.doc 11/13/2007 9:00 AM J�� nie yReavis - FW 2-45 Medical Building SEPA Questionnaire - 4.0 From: "Clement, Mark D" <mark.d.clement @boeing.com> To: <JSPENCER @CI.TUKWILA.WA.US> Date: 10/29/2007 3:01:47 pm Subject: FW: 2-45 Medical Building SEPA Questionnaire - 4.0 Joanna, I Received your Fax. thanks Here is our 2 -45 HAZARDOUS WASTE MITIGATION PLAN AND INFORMATION Please let me know if you need more information. thanks Mark Clement Desk phone 425 965 -2458 (Renton only) no voice mail Cell phone 206 617 -2944 Permit Administrator Mark Clement 2 -45 HAZARDOUS WASTE MITIGATION PLAN AND INFORMATION > Soil within the foot print of this project is not known to be > contaminated. Soil excavated to support this project will be properly > stockpiled or containerized, sampled and designated per WAC > 173 - 303 -070. The soil will be disposed in accordance with the > appropriate regulations. > > Lead shielding and other leaded equipment associated with the x -ray > room will be recycled as scrap metal. Sweepings and non - recyclable > lead items will be managed as dangerous waste per WAC 173 -303 at Plant > 2's central accumulation area, building 2 -120. > > Fluorescent light tubes and mercury switches /thermostats will be > managed as universal waste per WAC 173 - 303 -573 at the central > accumulation area. Broken lamps and two mercury- contaminated sink > traps will be managed as dangerous waste at the central accumulation > area. > > Daniel M. Machut > Environmental Scientist > Plant 2 BCAG -737 Airplane Programs SHEA > M/S 1W-12 > phone: (206) 655 -8344 > fax: (425) 294 -9263 > pager: (206) 797 -2003 > e -mail: daniel.m.machut @boeing.com > PLAN REVI EW / RO U TI N G SLI P ACTIVITY NUMBER: PROJECT NAM E PW07 -112 Boeing #2-45 Bldg SITE AD D RIBSR 7775- EMarginal Way S Original Ran Submittal Response; to Incomplete Letter*_ Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Is Issued'' Permit denied .because SE'A needed. SEA now turned in (M7-017). No correction letter was sent out. DEPARTMENTS Public Works permit being rerouted for review. Building Division ❑ Fire Prevention ❑ Public Works ❑ Structural Planning Division Permit Coordinator L -� DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS (fues.,Thurs.) I Incomplete I I Complete Comments DUE DATE 10/25/07 Not Applicable ❑ Permit Center Use Only I N CO M PLErE LETTER MAILED: LETTER O F CO M PLETEN MS MAI LED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ FAN ❑ Staff Initials TU6ITHURSROUTING: Rease Route REVIEWER'S INITIALS Structural Review Required ❑ No further Review Required DATE APPROVALS OR CO RRBCTI O N S D U E DATE 11/21/07 Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions❑ Not Approved (attach comments) I 1 Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS DATE Permit Center Use Only CO RRB 11 O N LETTER M AI LED: Departments issued corrections Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials Doamentslrouting dip.doc 2 -28 -02 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION October 19, 2007 Mark Clement P.O. Box 3707 MC 1W-09 Seattle, WA 98124 Subject: Planned Action SEPA Review E07 -017 Dear Mr. Clement: Your application for a Planned Action SEPA review at 7775 East Marginal Way South is considered complete as of October 18, 2007 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (206) 431 -3659. Jaimie Reavis Assistant Planner cc. D07 -377 dd. PW07 -112 JR H: \Complete -PA SEPA Review_Boeing 2- 45.DOC Page 1 of 1 10/18/2007 11:55 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 1'07- Ile, File Number E 7 —vi7 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building 1 Planning ublic Works Fire Dept. Police Dept. Parks/Rec Project: J e,ri q 2 -'1 PA-ivied ,4cim-Y7 SEPA ref/lat., , Address: � 17 7 5" ciZsrl' ii2e ir t-/ /Alt v S Update date: Date transmitted: / D/i' /2._€T-7 Response requested by: 16 /3 l Staff coordinator: (ill i P goa viS .Date response received: (z.7 REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) Pk) h,O5 ratio 5CP co t4-v UALis i h,ow e cru' >^1 jdewc OPr✓L4A•; + Dirie c tai. s Lt. o.)21- ve,s 5 1 1-eA,14,*4-0 kanco etatA/, Cs (.l, Q,SS Gat.tR, I % Gowd-C, iut,a.Q- 'L t b,.,4 r w_ /A-04 e) Plan check date: J 1.1,1-1 L 1 Comments prepared by: V O � A . uA.Q., s Update date: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number En-7-6/7 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM l 14t +a(m✓ TO: j Building CI Planning Public Works :Fire Dept. M Police Dept. MI Parks/Rec Project: n e in j 2-K 'PI4civied Ac lnr 'i s% PA review Address: 17 7 5" 6/ & t y s ,>n/ Date transmitted: /oh g' /la)7 Response requested by: i 6 3 % f2c7 Staff coordinator: •im r P Wet VI 5 _ Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., ncot required by an adopted. development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or turning analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) � n Cbv\ (XS' S Plan check date: Comments prepared Update date: TO: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number Ec 7 -o /7 LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM Building !� Planning . D '" Public Works • 7=4 Fire Dept. r!. Police Dept. • Parks/Rec Project: 9t e ai 4 2 -zts t wz,d Ac iv- GEM Ye e ti/ Address: 17.7 5 C 5t' YYIu7 > %{ i74-1 1A Date y transmitted: /aI filet-7 Response requested by: Il) /3 % /i7 Staff ,_ coordinator: i/f i P .pfd yr S _ response . received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or tuming analyses) may be required of the applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) 4;' IPlan check date % yzeep Comments re •ared b : Update date: CITY OPfUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA PLANNED ACTION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: D ei r\ 0 \' S �' a' 5 r eie 1 a to W alt' P av k; A g () j o e/...1%)) c o n y\ e v DC .11 P\" h S - P l Atitl. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. �e5-t MAvJ;ri4% WP`( 5, ToIK W ■ jJA 91izy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). -53 a y �y °►� °�- DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: NI Ay- C t e C 2 o T Address: P. 6. Box 3-701 r■ e W- 01 S e e4 t 1 e ut+ A Phone: a 0‘ % l 1 ' D-94-I-1 FAX: a 0 iv % FcgrdtraD Q v l< d. C 1 .V 1 i L N \l/�J b o " V 3. \/ • f E -mail: M J ; nl o s li ; i I, II Signature: Date: /0 ////6 a� . • P:\P anning Forms \Applications\SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -PACT Planner:bti e2G1V6'S (Date: go I i 5i ) File Number: b --) 01 1 Project File Number: Application Complete Application Incomplete (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Numbers NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: D ei r\ 0 \' S �' a' 5 r eie 1 a to W alt' P av k; A g () j o e/...1%)) c o n y\ e v DC .11 P\" h S - P l Atitl. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. �e5-t MAvJ;ri4% WP`( 5, ToIK W ■ jJA 91izy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). -53 a y �y °►� °�- DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: NI Ay- C t e C 2 o T Address: P. 6. Box 3-701 r■ e W- 01 S e e4 t 1 e ut+ A Phone: a 0‘ % l 1 ' D-94-I-1 FAX: a 0 iv % FcgrdtraD Q v l< d. C 1 .V 1 i L N \l/�J b o " V 3. \/ • f E -mail: M J ; nl o s li ; i I, II Signature: Date: /0 ////6 a� . • P:\P anning Forms \Applications\SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 -431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items : :Information Required. APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1. Application Checklist (1 co ) indicating items submitted with application. 2. Completed E A ScreeninChec� d ed c Ion eria e_iYhtt r 3 3. One set of all drawings submitted with the Planned Action reduced to 8 1/2" x 11" or 11" x 17 ". 4. Application Fee $295. V -- -- 5 5. Underlying permit application that triggers SEPA Review. •�PRO/JECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: RECEIVED corthlU I `: DEVELOML,aT P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Index of Documents 1 Revision Submittal 2 Sepa Planned Action Application ." 3 Complete Application Checklist e 4 City of Tukwila letter and Planning Division Comments 5 .. Sepa Planned Action. Information 6. Planned Action Criteria checklist 7 ..Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist 8. Affidavit of Ownership -- 9 ..Building Demo. & Public works Permit v 10 Site Area, Location & vicinity Maps 11 11 by 17 Project Drawings -1 copy c 12 24 by 36 Project Drawings -4 copies Oct 15, 2007 Prepared by Mark Clement 1N3Gl!d013A3a ),1!Nnomoo • Sepa Planned Action Revision Submittal, Application and Checklist 2 -45 Building Demolition and Parking Replacement Project Boeing —Plant 2 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development The Boeing Company P.O Box 3707 M/S 1W-09 Seattle WA 98124 -2207 Oct 15, 2007 Prepared by Mark Clement RECE VE COM iiUN TY DEVELOPMENT CITY Or TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us • SEPA PLANNED ACTION INFORMATION In 1992 a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) was prepared for the Duwamish Corridor master plan, a proposal to redevelop Boeing properties in Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC) over a 10 year period. This current subarea plan /EIS updates and extends the previous analysis of the corridor's Boeing properties (about 650 acres) to the entire MIC subarea (about 1,370 acres). It also builds on the information developed for the City's Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Plan EIS efforts of 1994. The Proposed Action applies the "planned action" option for SEPA review as the center of a permit streamlining program of early, comprehensive environmental review, and supporting capital and regulatory revisions. REQUIREMENTS: Planned actions are developments that satisfy all of the criteria in TMC 21.04.152 (Planned Actions Identified). A proposal must initially qualify as a planned action, then pass a second screen to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and mitigation of all significant negative environmental impacts. The initial qualification criteria are summarized below. 1. The action is a "permitted use" located within the MIC /L (TMC 18.36.020) and MIC /H (TMC 18.38.020) zones and /or is an accessory use (TMC 18.36.030 and 18.38.030 respectively). 2. The action is: a. not an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 and TMC 18.06.270, b. not a conditional or unclassified use, in the respective MIC /L or MIC/H zones, c. not a development, any portion of which includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark, d. not a development associated with 16th Avenue Bridge construction activities. PROCEDURES: A Planned Action application form may be submitted with the underlying development permit. At the time you submit your application you must have all of the items listed on the attached "Complete Application Checklist." You may request a waiver from items on the checklist that are not applicable to your project. Please discuss this waiver request with City staff either at a pre - application meeting or at the time of application submittal. Within 28 days of receiving your application, City staff will determine if it is complete based on the attached checklist. If not complete City staff will mail you a letter outlining what additional information is needed. If you do not submit requested materials within 90 days from the City's request for additional information the City may cancel your application. rr;� City staff will review the development for substantive impacts and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The SEPA Responsible Official will decide if a development qualifies as a planned action. P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 PLANNED ACTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST To determine if the proposed project meets the criteria for consideration as a planned action please answer the following questions: 1. Is the proposal a permitted and /or accessory use located within the MIC/L (TMC 18.36) or MIC/H (TMC 18.38) zones? Uses listed as "conditional" or "unclassified" are not eligible for the planned action process. 2 S 2. Will all of the impacts of the proposal be mitigated by the time the project is complete? Please document all mitigation measures, using attachments if necessary. N v � ‘4 rive S col 5ecrl 3. Is the proposal consistent with the applicable sections of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan? v �l e. 5 4. Is the proposal any of the following: a. an "essential public facility" as defined in RCW 36.70.200 or TMC 18.06.270; NO b. a development related to the Regional Transit Authority light rail or commuter rail system; No c. a decision about the 16th Avenue Bridge improvement or disposition which would normally require a SEPA threshold determination; or N6 d. a development in which any portion includes shoreline modifications waterward of the ordinary high water mark? N6 RECEIVED T P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 any of questions a through d is yes, the proposal is not eligible for the If the answer to y q g Y� p p planned action process. P:\Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Date: City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist It /01 Applicant Name: 1 ` kv K C 1 € V't eaT Street Address: 1 7 7 5 E cn3 7 rAvb al WAS/ 5 City, State, Zip: 1-0K W k` `\ W R' I% f 2 H Telephone: 10 6 6 1 - Z 9 y LI Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. RECE /S9 (CON i, .0 D»EL ..' i21 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc December 4, 2006 Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all pases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YE )Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 - Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 (YES)Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 P:\Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc RECEIVED • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT December 4, 2006 Part A (continued) • City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete YES Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green /Duwamish or Black Rivers between-the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and /or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Continue to Question 1 -4 • City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" "flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenEtalv,E should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. 88"t� risiiTContinue to Question 3 -6 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) ei City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist • YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. O - ontinue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. ontinue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) RECENED COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us ci.tukwila.wa.us • AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I . I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 5 E. M 4V ,/ N it 1 14 A Y S To K w t (A for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at 5 e, "t "bt / e- (city), CA) (state), on 0 C t O b P V 1 s , 20 0 0 7 Print Name Address Phone Number Signature /MA4vK C I Me,J 1 Pa. Bay 5707 5 eel -bik cvA 91111 lob 6o-291./4i On this day personally appeared before Mei f4 r077- 5 executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF t 7. � r h - i _ - T Ir to me known to be the indi idt:al -who - as his/her voluntary act and deed forthe uses ,200 7 o c i-n e-2 NOTARY PUBLIC in nd for the State of Washington lg309 3P64 ,Arie se on P: \Planning Forms \Applications \SepaPA- 6- 06.doc residing at My Co ZQD ission expires ECEWED COMZUNFrt, December 4, 2006 October 3, 2007 • cry of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mark Clement PO Box 3707 MC 1W-09 Seattle WA 98124 RE: Letter of Incomplete Application # 1 Development Permit Application D07 -377 Boeing #2 -45 - 7775 East Marginal Wy S Dear Mr. Clement: This letter is to in orn you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on October 1, 2007 is determined to be incomplete. Before your application can continue the plan review process the following items from the following department need to be addressed: Plannin# Department: Brandon Miles at 206 431 -3684 if you have any questions concerning th.e following comment. Please address the comment above in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubrnittal a `.Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the nail or bye a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Permit Center at (206) 431 -3670. Sincerely, / CL4 n41: vtarshall hnician Enclosures File: D07-377 [ `.Penn t. Center \Ii corrp:ete Lettes\2007 \D07 -377 Incomplete Ltr #1.DOC vier 1N3tVdO13A3O A_L1NTWM100 '190?1 i 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: October 3, 2007 PROJECT: Boeing #2 -45 Bldg 7775 E Marginal Way S PERMIT NO: PW07 -112 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) PW can not proceed with review of this permit until a SEPA application for building demolition is submitted to the City. 2) joanna Comments 1 PW07 -112 DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: ZONING: PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS October 2, 2007 Mark Clement D07 -377, PW07 -112 7775 East Marginal Way S MIC /H The Planning Division of DCD has reviewed the above permit application. The application as submitted is incomplete: 1. The demolition of a commercial /industrial building greater than 12,000 square feet in area requires compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). This project will most likely qualify to be reviewed under the Planned Action process (Application Attached). DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: ZONING: PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS October 2, 2007 Mark Clement D07 -377, PW07 -112 7775 East Marginal Wy S MIC /H The Planning Division of DCD has reviewed the above permit application. The application as submitted is incomplete: 1. The demolition of a commercial /industrial building greater than 12,000 square feet in area requires compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). This project will most likely qualify to be reviewed under Planned Action process (application attached). 1N3JR.fd013g30 • PROJECT AREA SCALE: \ 2 -117 2 -116 • • • III ill C' P/ GATE B -18 • SITE ACCESS Illt III II NI III 2 -57 PS IMII 1. ;: NS 11 • 'I 11 es 2 -61 :I II II I II (/)� ;Q 1 ,� ws-ma LOCATION N-U© 2 gau _n_ 2-45BUILDING DEMO 2 -45 & REPLACE W / PARKING PROJECT #170514 -00 VICINITY MAP SEISMIC ZONE: 3 BUILDING CODE IBC 2003 EDmON BARRIER FREE REQUIREMENTS: ADA & WAC 51-30 NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO OCCUPANCY GROUP. MEDICAL OFFICE CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-N (SPRINKLERED) LEGAL DESCRIPTION • 2 -3• 000160 -0020 TRACT OF LAND BETWEEN THE DUWAMISH WATERWAY AS ESTABLISHED BY WATERWAY DISTRICT 111 OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND EAST WAY IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., THE JOHN BUCKLEY DONATION CLAIM NO. 42; SAID TRACT ALSO BEING SOUTHERLY PORTION OF A LARGER TRACT COMMONLY CALLED THE BOEING PLANT NUMBER 140 SITE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 28, 29, 32, 33; THENCE SOUTH 88'08'07" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 33, A DISTANCE OF 982.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 47'51'53' ALONG SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN 684.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 4725'24" 1215.02 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN DUWAMISH WATERWAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE FROM WHENCE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 4716'23" WEST 1969.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- ALONG SAID CURVE: A DISTANCE OF 397.99 FEET TO THE POINT WITH A LINE LYING 825.00 FEET SOUTH, AS MEASURED AT ANGLES, OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE JOHN BUCKLEY DONATION LAND NO. 42; THENCE SOUTH 89'09.36" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 42, OF 1387.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL THENCE NORTH 2732'15' WEST 160.30 FEET, FOLLOWING SAID MARGIN TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF FEET 10 THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH WEST 76.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THIS CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2,897,955 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. DRAWING INDEX R.EMOVAL. 2 -30 SHEET NO. 2 -27 lott• a 000011110. " z -2s � r� z -41 z -w ' 3 PROJECT AREA 1-41N 2 -44 2 -45 -GO 2 -55 J COVER SHEET 2 -49 10.02.07 O - 2 -63 ' GATE B -IB 9118 ACCESS 2 -57 • 2 -65 C3 GENERAL NOTES 2 -81 2 -85 2 -51 2 -80.: SCALE: NONE 2 -117 2 -116 N • Iri 4111,., C460R CODE SUMMARY SEISMIC ZONE: 3 BUILDING CODE IBC 2003 EDmON BARRIER FREE REQUIREMENTS: ADA & WAC 51-30 NUMBER OF STORIES: TWO OCCUPANCY GROUP. MEDICAL OFFICE CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-N (SPRINKLERED) LEGAL DESCRIPTION • APN: A COMMERCIAL MARGINAL AND IN THE COMPANY'S BEGINNING AND SECTION SOUTHWESTERLY EAST BEGINNING WEST OF SAID THE EASTERLY OF INTERSECTION RIGHT CLAIM PARALLEL A DISTANCE WAY; WESTERLY 2828.00 1250.10 47'51'53" TRACT 000160 -0020 TRACT OF LAND BETWEEN THE DUWAMISH WATERWAY AS ESTABLISHED BY WATERWAY DISTRICT 111 OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND EAST WAY IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., THE JOHN BUCKLEY DONATION CLAIM NO. 42; SAID TRACT ALSO BEING SOUTHERLY PORTION OF A LARGER TRACT COMMONLY CALLED THE BOEING PLANT NUMBER 140 SITE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: AT THE SECTION CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 28, 29, 32, 33; THENCE SOUTH 88'08'07" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID 33, A DISTANCE OF 982.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 47'51'53' ALONG SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN 684.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 4725'24" 1215.02 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN DUWAMISH WATERWAY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE FROM WHENCE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 4716'23" WEST 1969.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH- ALONG SAID CURVE: A DISTANCE OF 397.99 FEET TO THE POINT WITH A LINE LYING 825.00 FEET SOUTH, AS MEASURED AT ANGLES, OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE JOHN BUCKLEY DONATION LAND NO. 42; THENCE SOUTH 89'09.36" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 42, OF 1387.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL THENCE NORTH 2732'15' WEST 160.30 FEET, FOLLOWING SAID MARGIN TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF FEET 10 THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH WEST 76.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THIS CONTAINING AN AREA OF 2,897,955 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. DRAWING INDEX R.EMOVAL. REVISION 81 ItPPRDNED p715/ZAVG ACCEPTABILITY 1810 0E504 •0 /05 SPEORCADON 8 APPROVED DRAWN DATE APPROVED Dr DEPT. DATE ZNECRED 8NEOa6D SUBTITLE COVER SHEET CURRENT REV41ON 170514 -00 aop rE 10.02.07 APPROV • APPROVED DEMO 2 -45 & REPLACE W / PARKING BUILDING 2-45 ARCHITECTURAL MASTER ' • PLANT 2 SHEET GO JOB DAC NM 170514 -00 elLi_S_TUK.DWG 2 -45 -GO 90A7092: 09/20/07 1450 ISSUE FOR PERMIT JOB 170514 -00 PROJECT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF WORK DEMIIJT1ON OF ENTIRE BUILDING 2-45 & REPLACE WITH PARING. PROJECT COST: ES$ CONTRACTOR ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER (WHEN KNOWN) 511E ADDRESS: 8123 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH TUKWILA WA OWNER BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE WEST REGION FACILITIES P.O. BOX 3707, MIS: 1 W-10 SEATTLE, WA 98124.2207 OWNER CONTACT: MARK CLEMENT 208.817 -2944 KING COUNTY PARCEL NO. 3324049002 0031600020 DRAWING INDEX DRAWING NO. SHEET NO. DRAWING TITLE REV DATE GENERAL • 2 -45 -GO GO COVER SHEET ORIG. 10.02.07 . CIVIL • 2 -45 -C3 C3 GENERAL NOTES - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -C460R C460R DEMOLITION PLAN - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -C461R C461R FOUNDATION REMOVAL AND SOILS EXPOSURE PLAN - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -C460 C460 SITE PLAN - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -0577 C577 SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -LS460 LS460 IRRIGATION PLAN - 10.02.07 • 2 -45 -C2 G2 SITE DETAILS REFERENCE - 10.02.07 • 2 -45 -G3 G3 ENTRY CANOPY REFERENCE - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -S10 S 1 0 FOUNDATION PLAN REFERENCE - 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -S500 S500 BUILDING FRAMING PLANS REFERENCE - 10.02.07 ARCHITECTURAL • 2- 45 -1A10 . IA10 FLOOR PLAN FIRST LEVEL REMOVAL D 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -2A10. 2A10 .. FLOOR PLAN SECOND LEVEL REMOVAL B 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -A60 . A60 ELEVATIONS & ROOF PLAN REMOVAL C 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -A110. . A110 BUILDING SECTIONS REMOVAL A 10.02.07 MECHANICAL . • 2- 45 -M10 MIO DUCTWORK. -- 10.02.07 • 2 -45 -84110 M110 PLUMBING -- 10.02.07 • 2- 45- UGM110 UGM110 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING -- 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -M260: M260 SPRINKLER -- 10.02.07 • .ELECTRICAL. • 2- 45 -C460E C460E SITE PLAN ELECTRICAL ORIG 10.02.07 R 2- 45 -1E10 1E10 LIGHTING PLAN E 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -2E10 2E10 LIGHTING PLAN D- 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -1E60 1E60 208Y/120 VOLT POWER V 10.02.07 • 2-45-2E60 2E60 O • 2- 45 -RFE60 RFE60 120Y /1 208V PLAN G ',LIcii 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -1E110 1E110 480Y / 277 VOLT POWER e B 10.02.07 • 2- 45- RFE110 RFE110 277 / 480V POWER PLAN DETAILS -POWER & COMMUNICATIONS . C A 10.02.07 10.02.07 • 2- 45 -E500 E500 • 2- 45 -E5001 E5001 DETAILS BLDG 2 -45 DUCT BANK & POWER FEED A 10.02.07 ..."LR1l0!L1 hVa 11 COVER SHEET CURRENT REV41ON 170514 -00 aop rE 10.02.07 APPROV • APPROVED DEMO 2 -45 & REPLACE W / PARKING BUILDING 2-45 ARCHITECTURAL MASTER ' • PLANT 2 SHEET GO JOB DAC NM 170514 -00 elLi_S_TUK.DWG 2 -45 -GO 90A7092: 09/20/07 1450 GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL WORK MATERIALS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA UTILITY DEPARTMENT AND THE LATEST EDITION OF THE WSDOT/AP'WA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. A SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE HOURS OF WORK IN THE STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE LIMITED TO 8:30 AM TO 3:30 PM ON WEEKDAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ALL STREET CLOSURES, PARTIAL OR FULL, SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOEING AND TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENTS, AND 911 SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE. • 3. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY THE TRUE AND CORRECT LOCATION SO AS TO AVOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL FIELD UTILITY LOCATION SERVICES AND VERIFY ALL UTIUTY LOCATIONS WITH THE PROPER BOEING FACILT 1ES PERSONNEL PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION WORK. FOR WORK LOCATED ON THE CITY OF TUKWILLA PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY LOCATE AT 1 -800 -424 -5555. 4. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. A MIN OF 3 (THREE) WORKING DAYS NOTICE I5 REQUIRED FOR SCHEDULING. TWENTY -FOUR HOUR NOTICE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO STARTING NEW CONSTRUCTION. 5. BOEING SHALL SECURE THE UTILITY PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF TUKWILA IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILTY TO SECURE ALL OTHER PERMITS PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 6. FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS TO HAVE UTILITY LOCATOR SERVICE LOCATE UTILITIES AND SHOW THEM ON CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY PLANT II FACILITIES SHUTDOWN COMMITTEE PRIOR TO SAWCUTT1NG AND EXCAVATION. • 8. ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, EXCEPT OFFICE AREA AND IRRIGATION SPRINKLER PIPING, SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF SURFACE LOCATED MARKERS, PER TYPICAL DETAIL ON SHEET C553. MARKERS SHALL BE LOCATED AT MAXIMUM INTERVALS OF 150 FT, AT ALL CIIANGES OF DIRECTION , WITHIN 5 FT OF A WALL AT ALL MANHOLES AND VALVE BOXES, AND ADJACENT TO ROADS. MARKERS SHOULD INDICATE SERVICE, PIPE SIZE, DIRECTION OF FLOW, PIPE MATERIAL AND PIPE DEPTH. MARKER INSTALLATION LOCATIONS SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE CONTRACTOR PROVIDED AS -BUILT INFORMATION IN THE FORM OF RED - NARKED DRAWINGS. 9. EXISTING MONITORING WELLS SHALL BE PROTECTED UNLESS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 00 NOT DISTURB MONITORING WELLS WITHOUT WRITTEN DIRECTION FROM BOEING SAFETY, HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS (SHEA - (206)544- 2393.) DISTURBED SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF BOEING SHEA. ALL WELLS THAT WILL BE DISTURBED SHALL BE ABANDONED BY BOEING SHEA. TWO WEEKS NOTICE SHALL BE GIVEN TO BOEING SHEA PRIOR TO DISTURBING THE WELL. GENERAL NOTES EXCAVATION: 10. PRIOR TO ANY BACKFILUNG OF NEW PIPE, IT SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A BOEING REPRESENTATIVE TO INSURE THAT PIPE RESTRAINT CONFORMS TO THE PROJECT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE BOEING REPRESENTATIVE 24 HRS IN ADVANCE OF BACKFILUNG ALL CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS -BUILT INFORMATION IN THE FORM OF RED - MARKED DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. 11. ASPHALT AND CONCRETE STREET PAVING TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAWCUT TO A MIN. DEPTH OF TWO INCHES. ALL SURFACE CONCRETE, PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, CURBS, GUTTERS, AND DRIVEWAY APPROACHES SHALL BE SAWCUT TO A MIN. DEPTH OF TWO INCHES OR REMOVED TO AN EXISTING EXPANSION JOINT. - 12. PERMANENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PATCH: AFTER THE SUBGRADE HAS BEEN PREPARED, PATCH WITH CLASS A (3/4") AIR - ENTRAINED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PER NOTE 4 ON SHEET C553, AND WITH DOWEUNG AND REINFORCEMENT PER CONCRETE TRENCH DETAILS ON SHEET C553. PLACE IN KIND AND TO THE THICKNESS OF THE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. ALL JOINTS SHALL BE SEALED WITH A JOINT FILLER PER WSDOT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 9- 04.2(1). AREAS WHERE AN ASPHALT OVERLAY EXISTS OVER CONCRETE PAVEMENT, AN ASPHALT OVERLAY SHALL BE PLACED OVER THE NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT PATCH IN KIND AND IN THICKNESS OF THE EXISTING ASPHALT OVERLAY. 13. PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVEMENT PATCH: AFTER THE SUBGRADE HAS BEEN PREPARED ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CLASS B SHALL BE PLACED IN KIND AND TO THE THICKNESS OF THE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT OR TO A MIN. DEPTH OF THREE INCHES, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. THE EDGES OF, THE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENTS AND CASTINGS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH HOT ASPHALT CEMENT OR ASPHALT EMULSION IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PLACING THE ASPHALT PATCHING MATERIAL. THE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SHALL THEN BE PLACED, LEVELED AND COMPACTED TO CONFORM TO THE ADJACENT PAVED SURFACE. IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER ALL JOINTS BETWEEN THE NEW AND ORIGINAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL BE PAINTED WITH HOT ASPHALT OR ASPHALT EMULSION AND BE COVERED WITH DRY PAVING SAND BEFORE THE ASPHALT SOLIDIFIES. THE MATERIAL FOR TACKING THE BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PATCHES FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SHALL BE AN EMULSIFIED ASPHALT PER SPEC. FOR SEALING THE EDGES AFTER PLACING THE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PATCH, USE A LIGHT CUTBACK CALLED RC -70, AND SAND THE SURFACE TO PREVENT TRACKING. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND OTHER GOVERNING AGENCIES FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND THE SOUTH YARD STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED BY BAUGH CONSTRUCTION. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER IF CONTAMINATED SOIL OR GROUNDWATER IS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE WORK. SEE CONTRACT SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR REQUIRED DIRECTION. 16. ALL EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED BOEING LOCATION. SOIL MATERIAL USED TO BACKFILL VAULT WALLS AND PIPE TRENCH SHALL COMPLY WITH "BACKFILL" MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED IN SPECIFICATION SECTION 02210 - "EARTHWORK ". 17. EXCAVATIONS ARE TO HAVE SLOPED SIDES TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES HAVING JURISDICTION AND WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS (WISHA). PROVIDE SHORING AND BRACING WHERE SLOPING IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF SPACE RESTRICTIONS, STABILITY OF MATERIAL EXCAVATED, OR TRENCH DEPTH IS GREATER THAN 4' -0 ". 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT NO EXPENSE TO BOEING, ANY STRUCTURES, PAVEMENT, OR OTHER ITEMS DESIGNATED TO REMAIN THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING REMOVAL OPERATIONS. • 19. DEWATERING AND EXCAVATED SOIL MAY BE HAULED AND DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE PER CONTRACT SPECIAL CONDITIONS WITH BOEING APPROVAL FOR SOIL DISPOSAL APPROVAL AND REQUIREMENTS, CONTACT BOEING SHEA AT (206)544 -2393. FOR. DEWATERING DISPOSAL APPROVAL AND PERMITS,CONTACT BOEING SHEA AT (206)655 -4930. ALL HAULING OF MATERIAL OFF SITE SHALL HAVE A CITY OF TUKWILA HAULING PERMIT. 20. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PREVENT ANY SILTS, SEDIMENTS, OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS FROM ENTERING THE DRAINAGE COURSE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT. MINIMUM STANDARD EROSION CONTROL METHODS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT ARE AS FOLLOWS: • SILT FENCING ALONG THE SHORE LINES OR IN AREAS WHERE LARGE EXPOSED SOIL SURFACE AREA RUNOFF PRESENTS CONCERNS. • FILTER FABRIC BAG SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN DRAINAGE BASINS 36, 37 & '38. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONING. • STRAW BALES SHALL. BE INSTALLED AROUND INLET GRATES WHEN SILT LADEN RUNOFF CONDITIONS BECOME TOO HEAVY FOR EFFECTIVE USE OF FILTER FABRIC SEDIMENT TRAPS AND SILT FENCING. • ALL ASPHALT AND CONCRETE SURFACES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING DAILY TO MINIMIZE SILT LADEN STORM WATER RUNOFF POTENTIAL. • EXCAVATED SOIL STOCKPILES ON PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE STORED IN UNED CONTAINMENT AREAS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WITHIN THE CONTAINMENT AREA CAN BE MONITORED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. ADDITIONALLY, THE SOIL STOCKPILES ARE TO BE FULLY COVERED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH RAINFALL • • DISTURBED AREAS THAT ARE TO BE EXPOSED FOR OVER ONE WEEK SHALL BE STABILIZED AND COVERED WITH STRAW AT A RATE OF 2 -3 BALES PER 1000 SQUARE FEET (APPROX. 2 INCHES THICK) TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH RAINFALL. • ALL ENTRANCES FROM EXPOSED SOIL TO PAVEMENT SHALL BE COVERED WITH GRAVEL OR CRUSHED CONCRETE TO MINIMIZE "DRAG OUT" OF SOIL GENERAL NOTES FIRE AND COLD WATER: 21. ALL WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON PIPE CONFORMING TO AWWA C110 AND CI11, LATEST REV., THICKNESS CLASS 52 OR AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS. CEMENT MORTAR LINING AND SEAL COATING SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C104 LATEST REVISION. PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE MON JOINT, OR AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 22. DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE CEMENT LINED, PRESSURE RATED AS NOTED ON PLANS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /AWWA C110/A21.10 -82. CEMENT UNING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /AWWA C104/A21.4 -84. IF FITTINGS ARE 3 INCHES TO 12 INCHES IN DIA. AND HAVE MECH. JOINTS, THE FITTINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EITHER ANSI /AWWA C110/A21.10 -82 OR ANSI /AWWA C153/A21.53 -84. 3 -114. TO 12 -1N. DIA. FITTINGS WHICH HAVE MECH. JOINTS AND /OR FLANGED JOINTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /AWWA 0110/A21.10.82 OR A COMBINATION OF ANSI /ANNA C110/A21.10.82 AND ANSI /AWWA C153/A21.53 -84 SUCH THAT THE PORTION OF THE FITTING WITH A MECHANICAL JOINT(S) MAY BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /AWWA C153/A21.53 -84 AND THAT PORTION OF THE FITTING WITH FLANGED JOINT(S) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /AWWA C110/A21.10 -82. IF FITTINGS ARE 4 INCHES TO 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND HAVE MON JOINTS, THE FITTINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI /ANNA C153/A21.53 -84. ACCEPTANCE TESTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 53 -5.3 OF ANSI /AWWA C153/A21.53 -84 OR WITH SECTION 10 -4.3 OF ANSI /AWWA C110/921.10 -82 SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND TRANSMITTED TO THE OWNER. 23. GATE VALVES SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C509 AND SHALL BE N.R.S. RESILIENT SEAT. VALVES SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR A MINIMUM WATER OPERATING PRESSURE OF 200 PSI. GATE VALVES SHALL BE MUELLER CO. NO A -2074 AND A -2075 OR APPROVED. ALL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 24. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS SHALL BE AT A MIN. OF 54 INCHES BELOW GRADE. ALL COLD WATER MAINS SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES BELOW GRADE. WHERE UTILITY CONFLICTS OCCUR, WATER MAINS ARE TO BE LOWERED TO CLEAR. ALL PIPE SHALL BE LAID BY OPEN CUT TRENCH UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ALL NEW WATER MAINS SIX (6) INCHES IN DIAMETER AND LARGER WITH PIPE CLEANING "PIGS" PRIOR TO DISINFECTION WHERE VISUAL PIPE INSPECTION CAN NOT TAKE PLACE. "PIGS" SHALL BE INSERTED INTO THE PIPE DURING PIPE INSTALLATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING AND OPERATING ALL TAPS, FLANGES, PUMPS, GUAGES, PLUGS, SADDLES, CORPORATION STOPS, MISC. HOSE, PIPING, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO "PIG" THE UNES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A DETAILED PLAN FOR CLEANING THE WATER MAINS AND HAVE IT APPROVED BY THE OWNER BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATION WORK. SEE SEQUENCING PLANS FOR PIGGING STATION LOCATIONS. 26. ALL NEW FIRE AND COLD WATER MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO A MIN OF 250 PSI IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND THE WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. ALL PRESSURE TESTING SHALL BE DONE IN THE PRESENCE OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE BOEING COMPANY OR THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 27. ALL NEW FIRE MAINS SHALL BE DISINFECTED BY AWWA STANDARD C651 SEC 5.3 SLUG METHOD. NEW COLD WATER AND SERVICES SHALL BE DISINFECTED BY THE INJECTION OF A 50 PPM (MIN. CONCENTRATION) CHLORINE /WATER SOLUTION. DRY CALCIUM HYPOCHLORITE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE PIPE AS LAID. CHLORINE SHALL BE METERED /INJECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING NAINS SHALL NOT BE MADE UNTIL THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS & TIME SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. ALL VALVE SHUT DOWNS AND OPENING OF EXISTING LINES TO ACCOMPUSH NEW WATER MAIN CONNECTION SHALL BE DONE BY BOEING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ONLY UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. 29. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PLUGS AND TEMPORARY BLOW -OFF ASSEMBLIES FOR TESTING AND PURITY ACCEPTANCE PRIOR TO FINAL TIE -IN. - - . - 30. ALL MON JOINT PIPE AND FITTING BELL GASKETS SHALL BE U.S. PIPE "FIELD LOK" GASKET FOR JOINT RESTRAINT. ALL MECHANICAL PIPE AND FITTING JOINT FOLLOWER GLANDS SHALL BE SERIES 1100 MEGALUG RESTRAINT MECHANISM MANUFACTURED BY E8AA IRON SALES. AFTER INSTALLATION ALL MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT MATERIALS SHALL BE COATED WITH COAL TAR EPDXY BY METHODS PRESCRIBED BY AWWA C203. 31. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING WATER MAINS TO BE TAPPED BEFORE BEGINNING WORK AND NOTIFY THE PROPER BOEING FACILITIES PERSONNEL OF EACH LOCATION. USE OF A LOCATOR SERVICE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED. 32. ALL PIPING SHALL BE RESTRAINED PER DETAILS ON SHEET M553 AND NOTE 30 THIS SHEET. 33. THE PIPING AND EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED IN A VAULT THAT DOES NOT HAVE FACTORY APPUED PAINT SHALL BE GIVEN A COMPLETE COAT OF FOREST PAINT 985 SERIES PRIMER OR APPROVED EQUAL. TWO FINISHED COATS OF FOREST PAINT 195 SERIES EPDXY, OR APPROVED EQUAL, SHALL BE APPLIED OVER THE FIELD COATED PRIMER, 34. UNDERGROUND PIPE IDENTIFICATION MARKERS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY THE INSTALLER OF UNDERGROUND PIPING. ANY DISTURBED MARKERS SHALL BE REPLACED. 9T APPROVED DAR: SYM BY APPROWD DATE DRAWING OF RECORD - 4982179 HG1/DED 1.08.01 PERMIT SET DED RO 10.2.07 A gLAWEAVA40 • 12 -f1 -n*. GENERAL NOTES STORM AND SANITARY SEWER 35. ALL STORM WATER PIPE SHALL BE ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEM ADS N -12 HDPE PIPE WITH ADS SERIES 35 COUPLINGS AND FITTINGS. 36. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STORM WATER SYSTEM SHALL NOT BE MADE UNTIL THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS AND TIME SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 37. PRIOR TO ANY BACKFILLING OF NEW PIPE, IT SHALL BE INSPECTED BY A BOEING REPRESENTATIVE TO INSURE THAT IT CONFORMS TO THE PROJECT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE BOEING REPRESENTATIVE 24 HRS IN ADVANCE OF BACKFlLLING ALL CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AS -BUILT INFORMATION IN THE FORM OF RED - NARKED DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. 38. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM WATER 10 BE TAPPED BEFORE BEGINNING WORK AND NOTIFY THE PROPER BOEING FACILITIES PERSONNEL OF EACH LOCATION. USE OF A LOCATOR SERVICE PRIOR TO EXCAVATION IS REQUIRED. 39. EXCAVATIONS ARE TO HAVE SLOPED SIDES TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES HAVING JURISDICTION AND W1SHA CHAPTER 296 -155 WAC. PROVIDE SHORING AND BRACING WHERE SLOPING IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF SPACE RESTRICTIONS, STABILITY OF MATERIAL EXCAVATED, OR TRENCH DEPTH 15 GREATER THAN 4' -0 ". 40. ALL DEWATERING AND EXCAVATED SOIL SHALL BE HAULED AND DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE PER CONTRACT SPECIAL CONDITIONS. 41. ALL NEW PIPE AND DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK. THEY SHALL BE CLEANED BY FLUSHING, RODDING, OR WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE UNOBSTRUCTED DRAINAGE. ALL CATCH BASIN SUMPS, MANHOLES, INLET AND OUTLET STRUCTURES, AND DEBRIS RACKS SHALL BE FREED OF ALL DIRT, ROCK, AND DEBRIS. 42. ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SOR -35 PVC CONFORMING TO ASTM 0 -3034. 43. ALL SANITARY SEWER PRESSURE PIPE 2° A AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC. ALL SANITARY SEWER PRESSURE PIPE 3 "4 AND LARGER SHALL BE CLASS 350 DUCTILE IRON PIPE CONFORMING TO NOTE 21 OF SHEET C2. RECEIVED G3upsQ4 L Wg seTOWg9 Om. CONSULTING ENGINEERS /CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL 1519 Vest valley Highway Ncrth, Site C�O�M'M^UNp�ITY Auburn, VA 98091 �LYC7.JL/P +YE:�T TEL (253) 833 -7776 FAX (253) 939 -2168 ACCEPTABILITY 1)16 DESIGN MD /OR SPECJA1CADON 6 APPROVED APPROVED BV DET. DATE DRAWN T. ROSUNG FRANKLIN 5. R 5. F)H KLIN NLWLLH D. DORMER CHI'LKED HJK AHPNOVEO APPROVED R9L 1)2.15.97 1.26.98 suomLE GENERAL NOTES CURRENT REVISION 982179 • SYMBOL DATE 1.08.01 12.15.97 2.16.98 2.16.98 2.16.98 TIME CML MASTER DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING PLANT 2 YARD YARD PLANT 2 SHEET C3 Ow0 NO. 972198 2 -YD -C3 COMP HO (33J y MaiA ... • ....... ................ •DUCT 3 -2 C( SPARE) 1�4'C(3 {JSU).1=d ^C(Si1RE) P1 l r F \ , \ , i ■/ • e.�'"'w u D 1 1 GRAVEL 0968 �`�yJ APPROVED DATE 5Y)4 RFASDN CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE Jj170514 -00 DJD FJW 09.07.07 A PERMIT SET DED RE1 10.02.07 le;LAirdszAvc. DRAWN . ACCEPTABILITY D DONOVAN TH6 DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED 8Y DEPT. DATE SUBTITLE PRE CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN REMOVAL. NOTES CAP AND BLOCK EXISTING 3" COLD WATER LINE. REMOVE HORIZONTAL SECTION OF 6" SANITARY LINE U.G. PLUG VERTICAL UNDERGROUND BEND W /NON- SHRINK GROUT. REMOVE HORIZONTAL SECTION OF 6" FIRE UNE. FILL ABANDONED LINE WITH CDF. REMOVE EXG PIV. VALVE. CAP AND BLOCK WESTERLY FIRE MAIN LATERAL. FILL ABANDONED FIRE LATERAL WITH CDF. CONCRETE BLOCKING PER TYP DTL C577. CONTACT BOEING MAINTENANCE TO TURN OF GAS, PURGE GAS MAIN, CUT, AND CAP EXG GAS MAIN IN BUILDING 2 -44. PROTECT GAS METER. CUT AND BREAK UP DUCT BANK TO ONE FOOT BELOW ' GRADE. PLUG CONDUIT WITH NON- SHRINK GROUT. REINSTALL CLEAN -OUT AFTER DEMO PER TYP DTL SHT C577. INSTALL TEMP SEDIMENT TRAP PER TYP DTL SHT C577. REMOVE CONCRETE PAD. DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING 2 -YD ��JOB SITE KEY PLAN SCALE: NONE N RECEIVEr1(�(`1!", G°3upen CwgBnesTOng9 11UV0 CONSULTING ENGINEERS /CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL 1519 Vest Volley Mghroy North, Sulte 001 Auburn, VA 98001 COwuY�p� i�.Tt�9 1EL (253) 833 -7776 FAX (253) 9391tInal CURRENT REVISION J #170514 -00 SYMBOL A DATE 09.07.07 C460 R JOB 170514 -00 COMP N0. CIVIL MASTER YARD PLANT2, WA ONO No. 2- YD -C460R OONOVAND 6/6/2007 54235 AN C =7 C=D CC7 C =3 C] C =3 Y - - - -- YC832 -1851 1 1 • 17 i 1 I 1 -- - - -- -- 0832 =7841) — 16•srs —I-1 'I I m1 I I .4•SAN ---)01-- - -,-- J — y 6" SAN 11 CONNECTION 1 INV= 6.0 - - r --0 -77°1 SAKI 1 f ' CB36 -182 ��' 6,'bTS(C)1 1 I CB6 -1811 I'1 II / I - I I I I; 1 I 1 I III ■ I 1 i I ! I I I ,' I I II'I i. 1 '�' EXPOSED SOIL v- A SE (16'(1) x 15'(w) x 1.5'(D) 1°1 BUILDINGS 2 -40/44 i POSED: SO(G: i ?ii: r:: r:: is i EXPOSED SOIl:i }ii:i4:: i:: T Y? .PN(SEC7O) 1 - -- CB36 163 - — — — — - II • I1> 1 I DAN (2)14 I REMOVAL NOTES REMOVE STRIP FOOTING 1' -6" WIDE x 1' -6" DEEP FOOTING. SEE REF. DWG DTL( arr- REMOVE ELEVATOR PIT CONCRETE FOOTING AND CONCRETE FLOOR BASE ONLY AFTER BOEING ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS HAS VISUALLY INSPECTED THE PIT FOR OILS AND CONTAMINATES. SEE REF. DWG DTL 50- REMOVE CONCRETE STRIP FOOTING. ® REMOVE RAMP /RAMP FOOTINGS, AND MOW STRIP. SEE REF. DWG DTL W 3 REMOVE STAIRS, FOOTING, AND LANDING. SEE REF. DWG DTL (� REMOVE RAMP SIDEWALK AND EAST RAMP CONCRETE FOOTING. SEE REF. DWG DTLC REMOVE SEATING WALL. SEE REF. DWG DTL i CONSTRUCTION NOTES T21I �°r� " —i — �- - -0— ie—l3 111�10 ' SANI /� I HI CB36 -182 i I i i i C8'6-1811 �' I1� 1 . 1 I I 1 9 i I i �,,,I���I�,,, L IEI 1 1 VALVE '(':j'�: ': r::c:::'r::: rr: � r:: rr:c:::�:::'::.r: : rraQ1F _CC: jI CB32 -184[ CB36 -213 CB38 783 - -• - — 1,,,-,--. _ EL C DlJCT 1 ( i I, ' '� : iBAN 2)i4 )II I (24" ° I ; .:I (. I II 1 (3)112 I� a 1 : i Ge34 +17 I, {$? I I 1 cafe 177(ak I� I. .. l y Mi tIVRATIVIIIMEMZLIEEMEIZIEIMMENNICEZNIETtaitifflEffeEwl : ise °s ® meaa aiilRi i ■ •. .•:•:•'_ _ 1 . � ! �. ai. d® a'rae6 ®tie6ae ®ammeasmauon��o�4. -.._.:...' � ..' :...4. c 1 mN ��mssamaamaammasmme =iemivamaamamramsm��IC :••Y� - 1 -:'' v r : b C836 164 510 m *s.. 711111\ MH36 -163 -•r —�' --' II • :.0836- (fif.:e 575(C) CtT36 -172 24'SI ELEC DUCT:: PAINT 4" WIDE SOLID WHITE PARKING LINES. INSTALL 6' PRE CAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS, STAKED WITH (2) #4 1' -0" LONG DOWL. INSTALL 6' EXTRUDED CURB PER TYP DTL C577. PAINT 4" WIDE SOLID WHITE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY LINES. 8' LONG x 16" WIDE SOLID WHITE PAINTED CROSSWALK LINE O 32" O.C. — — s - -a=- INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER TYP PERIMETER JOINT 0 EDGE 01L C577. INSTALL NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER TYP DTL SHT C577. MATCH EXISTING FINISH & CONSTRUCTION JOINT SPACING. PLANT NEW GRASS SOD. MATCH EXISTING GRASS SPECIES. NEW LUMINAIR PER ELECTRICAL DWGS. NEW UGP CONDUIT TRENCH PER TYP DTL SHT C577. INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER TYP LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT DIL C577. RESTORE LANDSCAPING IN KIND AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE PRICE FOR 4" ASPHALT PAVEMENT PER TYP DTL SHT C577 IN LIEU OF CONCRETE PVMT PER NOTE 6 & 11. (SEC14) 7)'w(5EG15) 1 I I 36 -1 I .. V NtSEC144) I� 4 "StS(C 24 "S6ig MH3 - LEGEND 00117(3 =Y'C( SPARE)..- 4'C(3f350)7:- 4:C(SPAHE 6 -171 NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK. EXISTING CONC. S/W. NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT. NEW GRASS SOD. EXISTING CONC. PVMT. 2199001106 . SHUTO r Cr7 'ytt lob •it X X � � • — DOUBLE CHECK - VALVE ASSEMBLY IN PR RECEIVED 0 alA: 20 "CW t�tScL;_ -•—J08 SITE '12�TSLPEE... SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' CONSULTING ENGINEERS /CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL 1519 Vest Valley Highway North, Rite 101 Auburn, VA 98001 TEL (253) 833 -7776 FAX (253) 939 -2168 - ORIGINAL ISSUE A PERMIT SET Jjl70514 -00 09.07.07 10.02.07 elLAWISVEZAW ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND /0R SPECIFICATION 5 APPROVED APPROVED BY NO,PII .....•atuW.,., , ..n. N-. mvvlyc Nr e, W mn DRAWN 0 DONOVAN tRECR . F AREVELO 0 DONOVAN G 111190 APPROVED F WEAVER APPROVED SITE PLAN CURREN, REVISION Jfl170514 -00 SNEET 09.07.07 mLE DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING 2 -YD CNIL MASIER YARD PLANT2, WA 170514 -00 WC NO. 2 -YD -0460 SEE TABLE 2 FOR TYPICAL BLOCKING FOR HORIZONTAL FITTING . . MECHANICAL PIPE AND PLUG • \ :== =i=11 j All MON JOINT PIPE HORIZONTAL DEADEND JOINT RESTRAINT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TABLE 2 FITTING SIZES PRESSURE ((PSI) • REQUIRED THRUST BLOCK BEARING AREAS (SQ. FT) FOR WATER FITTINGS 0 280 PSI 11 1/4" BEND 22 .1 /2' . BEND 45' BEND 90' BEND TEES & PLUGS, 4" & 6" 280 1 2 .3 6 4 8" 280 2 3 6 .10 7 10° 280 2 4 8 16 11 12° . 280 3 6 12 . .22 16 8 "0 ID CAST IRON RING & COVER COLLAR 3000 PSI CONCRETE THREADED PLUG 2' -0" SQUARE 1"0 SCH 40 PVC PIPE 0 . 10" 0.C. TO LANDSCAPED AREAS • PAVEMENT 3/4" R, TYP. LANDSCAPED AREAS FACE OF CURB 50 ate= . \ � \ \// AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBBASE VEMENT EPDXY ADHESIVE TYPICAL EXTRUDED CONCRETE. CURB • SCALE: 1 1/2" = .1' -0" CATCH BASIN OR INLET GRATE USUALLY WSDOT STD PLAN 8 -2o TEMPORARY PERMEABLE FILTER BAG AS MANUFACTURED BY ATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION FABRICS, INC.(800- 448 -3636) OR APPROVED. REBAR FOR LIFTING FIBER JOINT PACKING 3000 PSI ENCASEMENT MIN 4" THICKNESS SEWER PIPE SEWER PIPE PLUGGED END (IF END OF LINE) SEWER PIPE WYE TYPICAL CLEANOUT NTS RED PLASTIC WARNING TAPE � " NEW PAVING 1 MATCH EXISTING s e., e TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP TYPICAL DETAIL MAXIMUM SEDIMENT .ACCUMULATION ALLOWED = 1 FT NTS CLEAN, SELECTED BACKFILL, UNSATURATED EXCAVATION MATERIAL, TO EXCLUDE ALL SHARP ROCKS AND STONES OVER 3 ", OR CONTROLLED DENSITY FILL - COMPACT TO 95% DENSITY IN 6" LAYERS (MAX) 1 1 /2" CONDUIT (LUMINAIRE) SAND BEDDING 1 -1/2" PVC CONDUIT (SPARE) 5TM PWR TRENCH SECTION N.T.S. BY APPROVED DATE sru RCVS 4" CONC WALKWAY EXPANSION JOINT (24' o.c.) DUMMY JOINT (12' o.c.) OR MATCH EXG JOINT SPACING Yi CHAMFER A.C. PAVING WHERE OCCURS N : 12 SLOPE SLOPE VARIES L1— \x< \��\ —III -111 III .� /� ° (2) A4 CONT. 12" MIN. CLASS "A" FILL COMPACT TO 95% - CONCRETE SHALL HAVE 28 -DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AND 5% AIR ENTRAINMENT - REINFORCING SHALL BE PER ASTM A -615, GRADE 60 TYPICAL CONCRETE WALKWAY SCALE: NTS JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUIVALENT TO ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS. I I I I LiL 6' MAX. POST SPACING MAY BE INCREASED TO 8' IF WIRE BACKING IS USED NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE CONTROL JOINT PER CONSTRUCTION NOTE 2 CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER CONSTRUCTION NOTE 3 CRUSHED ROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 95% PER MODIFIED PROCTOR PREPARE SUBGRADE PER WSDOT STD SPEC 2- 06.3(1) EXISTING CONCRETE OR BLDG FOUNDATION TYP. PERIMETER JOINT @ EDGE SCALE: NTS 2 "x2" BY 14 Ga. WIRE OR EQUIVALENT, IF STANDARD STRENGTH FABRIC USED FILTER FABRIC MINIMUM 4 "z4" TRENCH L I BACKF1LL TRENCH WITH J NATIVE SOIL OR 3/4 " -1.5" - 2 " x4 WOOD P OSiS, S T EEL FENCE WASHED GRAVEL POSTS, REBAR, OR EOUIVALENT TEMPORARY SILT FENCE TYPICAL DETAIL NTS 2" OF 5/8" MINUS TOP COURSE PER WSDOT STD 9- 03.9(3) COMPACTED TO 957. OF ITS MAX DRY UNIT WT AS DETERMINED 81' ASTM D1557. 4" ASPHALT SURFACE COARSE PLACED IN TWO LAYERS 6" AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO 95% OF ITS MAX DRY UNIT WT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 COMPACT SUBBASE TO DENSE AND YIELDING CONDITION • ALTERNATIVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION SCALE: NTS 88 APPROVED DOE PERMIT SET DED 60 10.02.07 TYP SCALE: NTS CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER CONSTRUCTION NOTE 3 CRUSHED ROCK BASE COMPACTED TO 957. PER MODIFIED PROCTOR PREPARE SUBGRADE PER WSDOT STD SPEC 2- 06.3(1) /4 "x2" SAWCUT; FILL WITH SEALANT (PLACE BOND BREAKER TAPE AT BOTTOM OF SAWCUT PRIOR TO PLACING SEALANT) LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT CONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. JOINT SEALANTS FOR SAWED CONSTRUCTION JOINTS:. JOINT SEALANTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M173 CONCRETE JOINT SEALER, HOT POUR ELASTIC TYPE. 2. JOINT SEALANT FOR OTHER CONCRETE CONTROL JOINTS: JOINTS SHALL HAVE A 3/4" THICK PRE MOLDED FILLER CONFORMING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR "PRE FORMED EXPANSION JOINT FOR CONCRETE PAVING AND STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION" AASHTO M213 EXCEPT THE REQUIREMENT FOR WATER ABSORPTION, WHICH IS DELETED. THE JOINT ABOVE THE FILLER SHALL BE SEALED WITH A TWO -PART .URETHANE JOINT SEALER CONFORMING TO ASIM C920 FOR USE IN VEHICLE TRAFFIC AREA DIMENSIONS OF SEALER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEALER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. • 3. CLASS A (3/4") AIR ENTRAINED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE WITH COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI WITHIN 4 DAYS SEE TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION THIS SHEET FOR REINFORCEMENT.' RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I mp ®P4 C wgBao ® ®u ng9 Dare. CONSULTNG ENGINEERS /CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL 1519 11u8 Vy Iistvay Nalh. Sala 101 Auburn RA 98001 TEL (253) 633 -1716 FAX (253) 939 -2188 ACCEPTABILITY DEIS 0(5164 AND /OR SPECIFICATION 6 APPRO4ED DRAWN CMS T.HLI.REU 11 suBm1E STANDARD SECTION & DETAILS QIRRENI R0A5104 031098 511.1301 A DATE 10.02.07 APPROVED DP DEPT DATE LNGINLER NJC DED VIED APPROVLD 7.2.98 8.6.98 APPROVED IDLE CIVIL MASTER DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING RENTON SITE RENTON C577 JO 1 N0. -- COMP N0. 2 -YD -0577 REMOVAL NOTES. REMOVE EXISTING SPRINKLER HEAD AND TRANSMISSION LINE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES INSTALL NEW IRRIGATION LATERAL SYSTEM. INSTALLER TO SUBMIT A MATERIAL AND DESIGN PLAN TO THE OWNER FOR PREVIEW. .CONNECT TO EXISTING 1" IRRIGATION LATERAL. LEGEND . SCRUB HEAD W +M 100 SERIES. T, LAWN HEAD W +M 500 SERIES STANDARD ON NO. 33 (POP -UP) • SCRUB HEAD W =M 500 SERIES ON NO. 36p (POP -UP) W/ NO. 97 & 73 ADOPTORS. SCRUB HEAD W =M 500 SERIES ON N0. 37p (POP -UP) W/ N0. 97 & 73 ADOPTORS.. SL W +M 512 -3 SL W +M 512 -3 LATERAL LINE (CLASS 200 P.V.C.) - - - -4" SCHEDULE 40 Al S SLEEVES UNDER CONCRETE: INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR O BED SPRAY NOZZLE W +M N0. 105 W/ POP UP (12 ") ASSEMBLE. RECEIVED KEY PLA SCALE: NONE pEV NITY WENT Ru erR EGA JBnsevOng9 Du © CONSULTING ENGINEERS /CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL 1519 Vest Valley Highway North, Suite 101 Auburn, VA 98001 TEL (253) B33 -7776 FAX (253) 939 -2169 Ar ®EeAc® ACCEPTABILITY IH5 DESIGN AND /OR 517E0-CAPON 5 APPROVED 8 6 .m v.r I a..a•a".•maa ea\Y US 1 ss QLIIIJ7tN6r L PfYill±t /A31Pderli�' • 121•1• SE ERATER JOINT (5.J) c.OMCJ'.ETE. ►RVItiC;. MED big or-1, (Tyr) W.W.M. (4R4 - (. /to rORMGR EXIST. CTRppE (TOP OF LOHC.• SLAB) GoMPRer p FILL (CIP1'0JLJt.P ) TIP C.OPIPRGTED . SUISCTRROE ®_T1� Aim • TYPICAL Q7NC1t> irmr= • MI Rini JIIIi Imu� SECTION ' 4446tvw CUT Ar urDAu -. SIDpS. Or PUk'TOOL 44 ItreRR . IL' 04 (E-1.1 9' cant. Now sTRlr LRL1N r*RriLK dxPDL• 4.0 PderORATtw PIrE 'PLANTER. rFC'1'ION . 1• r- oria rW 3/8•.. r- rioTE: 1,UJD E. WALL.• 9i HO sP? Mx:T 1�.QR i EXTEND I,I 1LL Min. IL' BieLOW rXIST.. !($il tsuILoiNce Uric. CC, LAWN roRricR�RRbG rl RI'4T 'SGi'- rit._.Lro .6•> 'in _ _ i. _ I _rzl� AMMILANCS EN RAN'CE a42... z1 SECTION puILDING; urf ' 1h GONC.R.ETE pRVINGT. LIEIV FORNEK WAVE (AMPRGTE.O FILL LZMPRGTGD SUBC1FiA *I 19.06. t,.l TYPICAL CJONMEGTION rosr OCET TYPE • pCRCK rePc- 4011.. i sEAn1gG 'mu: t SECTION': RO•tTVC aLtase GN��ST. SLID Vt"AI CPIV•L- 6/6411 DRAIN MDT :'4PIMP PIPE 8/8•- 1'- 0! • H"=�. LI ,,d 44-tAN ;NJ Ptf+I • _..1.W PriuTo tlWt: li1TIFf'ED -LOT m"A-uM . ' tiPILS T-, tXPRN3I 601.75 F10TGI 1. H.RgILS 1a l9G PHO'1Zeo RLUM OR PRIHTCD 1 -1ETRL. (5ME LAYOUT PLAN) L RAILS TO ITC MO 5L.OPE OF RFiMPS on. 5miRS ELEVATION 150IL123-14 LINE THRESHOLD ft_ ITT C7TH sHF1 L IS 111' VERT. JOINT IZ• POtJE.L.D9'0.G SE ctio 9 '\ IIANDEME 60,47.62- ELEVATION ILEI'tcVI/6LE GOMYCGTION POST rbal • (SCE L.RYOUT rLFH) 1(2' -T- rLRNTNg t E.p e..oNGAILVIS PRVINO. GX15T. aTRaDG GaMPRGTEO FILL (HORlz.) 10 K.1' VARIES Gtaca Dlol.IFt. SIN exlsr. GONG. SLAB :•� coMPAC_TED Sul( RPE \:';.,�•. ,� • t'OFICf*EJE Ctmii a_ WATI4 SECTION 1'- 1'- 0° • racrtar. artswc ori•RGIED S1JD4I PE - 1,e161 'EMERGENCY EXIT. DELETED T SECTION /ELEVATION 3i 8'- r -. 0' rforE' 1. ET.taa11S To lSG ANODIZED/ R�LLUI. 1 TVP. cNNGGTOHS, SEE 1_,•_; S. REMOVE. coNNEGTIONS ONLY WHERE INDIGFITE' C7f1 LAYOUT PLRH G11ARDPA L 0412. �,zf ,EL1:VA'fIC.iN 0 T -•O' o' ICEIt$tR(L 5O4WULG. o C T. lI4Mt. Vab 15l4 1/2'- r- 0° LQ1PnCrED FILL7 ' . ro _4RTE s*' lo• Res 3ID'{ Dc r].UA11NGDOC L. DELETED SECTION . B /8•- 1' -.0'. et.nLDIn[• Uric LotiGRCTC PA> 89 ICPBRR 12.' O.L. (E.(4.) C� GONGRETE •RNINGT 4EJ� Fo2MGR 4182 . ....11Yi►LR b” FaP Arta. aetltP -. LOrtr.nerco FILL IKEYEDICIINT £LEVATICIN 1/2"=T-031 'SEGT'ION 1'N i'' 0 :: • • Gb'IPticT. FILL. For-HER MOVE I Fel ® •A1/Nf,t TIOLN DEL•-TeD eCH■ND srr,Tror`I r- 0' 7—y'�' 4,19•.4_51,[ L:nignl�lll_ — , TMnTrz Qi: PRTT . DELETED . SE'CTION' F. 3/8'- 1'- 0' 1VM L•»iw No-L. FtVIFaJ /Do" RP A/NIOVED DATE 3VM REVISIDR AMIIOVED DATE p•1 S'1 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT O AUPURN, WA. 98002 ❑ EVERETT, WA. 98201 O KENT, WA. 98031 O PORTLAND, OR. 97220 O RENTON, WA. 98055 ▪ SEATTLE, WA. 98124 a ,r: V .r,. At, ,Au ACCEPTABIUTY THIS DESIGN AND!OII SPECDICATION IS APPROVED • pump, PV bJ,i CR�(CFT RANTING SLEEVE DIZ 4'. 'i [1Sr r..1.2 'S.. ' J I• watts JOIHT 11LI.CJF TOM/ WALL men • earo'RGT. FILL 7/ N el. SECTION 1 1/2•- r- 0• 117, SECTION $UUkO KOBAYASHI ULLMAN,:IIVC. . Landscape Architecture & Planning ,633 Yesler Way, Seattle, Washlnaton 98104 (206) 682 -37$6 eD OAl su1pL1 DG'ttb'J * AM/tents 1V DEVI DATE MGR M Or ID APPROVED A PPOVEO t nl IS P ICAL riTir..Try FIUIfl nld -1 r1 ;11 'r rr PorTNc _; ..YTeTAFT3 /AST INVISION StN1T N owa ND EMneminrp/JI INGS\r.�M.n I hnam kiw N ranirr 1 ant BGr.. SrD la nlm 1ThZd I IwsUMfJVd Mb. STPJfL2MLIDL'M13J pMVttNI2BOFESS_VBINT • MOTE' (D coNNCLT ib JUHCr,oN Box PROVIDED Of EVERGREEN MoESLE I. Lu1INDIRL5 TO FL.OUREsLENT W (2,)40 77 VOLT 0.5/11.1.1:61- to 141 pL.UM. HoU51r14, LLGRR I PrUG LEn5, LITNOHJR Pp• 2,40 FIR. LW oR EOUP L - CIRCUIT OH FILM. P -lR5E5 04110Pf ItoOPUNE e - -6UTTE aln ? 11�U 91 41.4E 4..4" 9' f I 14' (1V ) OSNoP•/ RooloUNE (4) fLousezCI?ri' L1.A'11NgIR!✓ 314'4 4410 _CANOPY PLAN H3' r U Ri vl '77i 17 11. 70I.I145Pt,o11- (KM/CH-lb COLUHn } TIE To P.AIH LEADER) T' 1:3 7: 1,%1.21 4 I DL7o1C CoLL1M, &"JTTP Lei 4eoL. -Or or ca.. EL. Z5 S' 141. ad oA ,0 4 4410 1 PWFIT To MRTCH DEGKINCT LUMP -MIRE (c.tri1TJ .) seAr. rgPPINGr S •RELI VW VKINSIMEOMMOIW VW VW VW 4. oL. 1 /$.- 1'— 0' BUILDING LIM Ropy OCl.WM( GoP ru r c.NT STRIP' L. 3.244 Ft 114x4..6+' -.ML 18 TS. b'.(ol 1144. 1410 .t I2. 4 • 4 Mal Trace, N.S. G R5. CJEPpMSION BOLT (1VP.) NEW FG 13,E30 • • 1,241 -1Y- Olt -OI. mES 1IJN'Ill�'1 -i11 1'4CxP13oLT fC$4E./o'x/oF 112' 6tiCOur P III rtt =_n =ii -ITr tDONNECTTON AND TOOTING D1;TAt. BOTTOM OF F❑❑TING 41 LJLG.L r45. 4 FS. CONPgCT. FILL eorW c.T. SUPJGRRFiVE NOTE' I. • rl4 WORK SCNEPUI..E a:L..S 5r 5TRUC.TURRL . 2.T ' VlNISH {PRINT. INSTRUCTIONS. SEC sec-nor-4 6 OP PNF0SCI PROJEc.T M1NUFL SECTION i1 /2'••r -O' 6UILDIN(4 UNE TS. (ix (•'x1141 n I d } /E• LOt1PRCT. PILL PTO. FOOr1Mtq DLTR iL 5£F. STRUGrlJFF L WELL r15. ! F.5. -CONNECTION DETAIL Q BUILDING SECTION' 1 112 1'— G min-forum FLLpSNs44 G(l_1r SIC' SLOPE ToDDWn5rouT LOPI NLr .... ROOF DE•tkln(T (.10.12. / L5.2.•1/4 .51•01 CM. col CUT IN LHRMr1CL L3.2 . q4 O1DT SPLICE W11N •j1_oFtOL. MLIB t5. 411.4.1 .1 'DETAIL GUTTER REFERENCE DRAWING SECTION .. 7.5.4'x6',.1141 IL'.'1�4..'b,��,�'x41 Ilt' E&ROUT �I�,p.rrI'(51ON rd.T • °?�"GOMrect FILL N 1 112•'• r- o• NOTE( FOR. RE81R 5cJ•1(,PuI.E 5C£ STRIJCTURRL LQ'1P'pc•T. - „..11 =.11 1IF- L•01 IE LI.81 SU84rRRPE ! PIINTRDETATL • III n =1u =able: S :C77ON! • 1 1I2".' r- 0• • REVISION APPROVED OATS ITN w APPROVED DATE AfFIZEIIAKG FACILITIES DEPARTMENT O AUBURN, WA. 98002 0 EVERETT, WA. 98201 0 KENT, WA. 98031 0 PORTLAND, OR. 97220 0 RENTON, WA. 98055 SEATTLE, WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITY iN15 DESIGN AND10R SPECIFICATION I5 APPROVED APPROVEI1 EV PT. DAT DRAWN ST (%h CHECKED ftiGN. • �,i �DilE` r,Y i..STIGIO KOBAYASHI ULL.MAN, INC. Landscape Architecture & Planning 633 Yesler Way, -Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 682 -3730' 177.61 sueunl APPROVED APPROVE snkl .IVIEDTCAL FACILITY. EU UJ)T TG LPI<. .NT II !IC>rml 7'17,45g OAST REVISION SAW 00 Not., Mn At v. 033 Maras 1 fl. t, Nnn211 (TBRIrr 1 PIntIM1m (FP IR PIal-IR2 is 1 1Act flperf Mten CVP IR 70117 111.7101 1 OAxittnl, PRITETTC PRINT 12' -D" 12' -09b" 14LO3/g 164'-•44$E (4' -03'0" 14' -O" 12' -O 3i3" 14' -o' 3' 0"'141 KRE OrE 4 NIJ� IN ELEVATOR PIT iriGYJR ciLAB,TO BE FiN by ELEVATOK tN ALLER L 1 5 7 11 '1 iQ HICK 11 WJ�g r I.iJY1 1� 35 rLAGE & Fs tV I' -0R MIN. % F411104.Ev AT rT Von 6I IPP"LE $(U WAI.lbLCI'TAR (TYr) At7G rt. AX" EAR NNLLh REF 4BGr. -6(h1 R 1 asE1RIWi /.(ME ADP TO IABELEG 7 W' **HEAR WALL. L# m Pi ( OR GONG. V?.L.L 4%2" FAGS .O PAGE OF GGNGRE'TE a ceNc. WALL REINF WITH 2 -75 WALL TOP *v - rK� WALL ia li:_dUl.� £L HOOF. VE1GT. Wr 1.L- F E5OTT INTO PTA. 2x , NALEK WRH ANCHOR BIG -1 ' 481 ecr,E E)c .GONG. �iLAB .AWGLFT FOR NEW FOLJNDATIDN�i �EGTION, 11 GALE: %4'1 =1' OR I!'_il': -1 d1HLI1C SON gA LE. KE NF W •4 CD 120 FAWN WAY c 13. ND2 cE#TH. LEASE OPCNN61 RIM ELEVATOR IIXANL.L&C FPJR FOLOCIP.TION ALL FGt7TIN 11•4? won x w1 2 -415 IN SEGTI ON '4E_II Dr MSS 9i 111 I Q u a 13 u w u FOUNL2ATiON PLAN ',GALS: 1/b'- 1'-0"- STRUCTURAL NDTES L . THE UIETF•RM BUILDING CODE (UDC) 1987 EDtTION, LIVE LOADS( ROOF SNOW LOAD 25 PSP EIAM AND WAITING ROOMS 50 PSF FILE STORAGE ROOMS 150 P6F LATERAL: WIND 80 NPR. EXPOSURE -C' SEISMIC PER ZONE 11I LATERAL FORCES ARE TRANSMITTED BY THE ROOF k FLODR DIAPHRAGMS TO THE SHEAR WALLS: LOADS ARE DISTRIBUTED TO THE WALLS BY TRIBUTARY AREA. IME112ATTON, EITEND PERIMETER FOOTINGS TO FIRM UNDISTURBED SOIL OF 2.000 PST BEARING CAPACITY A MINIMUM OF 1' -6' BELOW 'ADJACENT EXTERIOR FINISHED GRADE. CONCRETE E's • 2000 P91 B 20 DATE fc • 900 PSI. MINIMUM OF 5 -l(2 SACKS OF CEMENT PER CU. YD. CONCRETE AND A MAXIMUM OF 6 -3/4 GAL. OF WATER PER 944 BACK OF CEMENT. NO SPECIAL INSPECTION 19 REQUIRED. CONCRETE PROTECTION FOR REINFORC INC 9WALL BE AS FOLLOWS. BOTTOM OF FOOTINGS. 8• ' WALL EXPOSED TO EARTH 2' WALL EXPOSED TO WEATHER 1-1/2• ALL CONCRETE IN 70011509, WALLS k SLABS SHALL BE PLACED' MONOLITHICALLY UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACING. 1 ' CALL BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTION OF REINFORCINC STEEL PRIOR • TO PLACING CONCRETE. TIEINFORCING 6TEELL DEFORMED BILLET STEEL AST 01-615. GRADE 40, Fr • 20,000 PSI. LAP ALL SPLICES 329 MINIMUM. PROVIDE ELBOW BARS AT WALL CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS TO SPLICE HORIZONTAL BARS. STRUCTURAL N MISCELLANEOUS STEEL1 STRUCTURAL GRADE A5T11 A -36, F • 24,006 PSI F1A111M1. ALL BOLTS SHALL BE *SEM A -307 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 0]8UC111RAL 11.5*9ER k. TIMPERt ALL LUMBER SHALL BE GRADED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT WWPA STANDARD GRADING RULES FOR WESTERN LUMBERI USE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES AND MINIMUM GRADES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. STUDS D.F. -I. STANDARD OR HEM -FIR E1 WALL PLATES k SCREEDS D.F. -L UTILITY' JOISTS k RAFTERS k HEADERS D.F. -L 02 OR DRY HE11-710 •1 • SEAMS 120077 D.F. -L 02 1250 77 POSTS k TIPBERS D.F. -L 01 1200 F7 • ALL PLYWOOD SHALL BE APA C-0 INT. CEASE WITH EXTERIOR CLUE AND MIN. PANEL ID.' INDEX 42/20 FOR FLOORB.'32 /16 FOR THE ROOF AND 76/0 FOR WALLS. ALL FOOD iN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE SHALL OE Pat-9B155 TREATED WITH AN APPROVED PRESERVATIVE. stomas 1611) BEAFIS' CLUED LAMINATED LUMBER MADE UP OF DOUGLAS FIR. GRADE 2.0 E, FB • 2800 P81. 611SCEILANEOUS1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DTFIEN910RS k CONDTTI0N9 IR THE FIELD. VERIFY 6120.7. LOCATION OF ALL OPENINGS IN THE FLOOR, ROOF k WALLS WITH ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL k ELECTRICAL. DRAWINGS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AS REQUIRED UNTIL ALL PERMANENT CONNECTIONS AND STIFFENING$ HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR CRAWL BRACE VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS AND DIMENSIONS NOT SHOWN. FLOOR B ROOF FREW.M. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS 2s SOLID SLOCK150 FOR JOISTS KT TN! SUPPORTS. PROVIDE CUT WASHERS FOR ALL BOLTHEADS AND NUTS BEARING ON MOOD. /EASING WALL FRAMINGt '2x6 STUDS • 16. 0.0. BELOW FIRST FLOOR, 2s4 0 16' 0.C. AT FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. ALL DOOR AND WINDOW HEADERS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLANS SHALL BE TWO 2910 WITH ONE CRIPPLE AND ONE STUD EACH END FOR OPENINGS 4' -0- WIDE OR LESS, AND TWO CRIPPLES AND ONE STUD FOR OPENINGS MORE THAN 4' -0' WIDE. ALL COLUMNS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLANS AND SCHEDULE SMALL BE TWO 121 STUDS. SPIKE LAMINATED COLUMN TOGETHER • 76' 0.C. WITH 169 NAILS FOR 2' STUDS.' ANCHOR BOLTS AND EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM 4• EMBEDMENT IN CONCRETE, • T1.DQr k ROOF DIAPHRAGM' APPLY I/O - PLYWOOD NAILED TO JOISTS WITH 09 RAILS • 0' O.C, . AT ALL SUPPORTED PANEL EDGES AND • 10' 0.C. ALONG INTERNEDTATE SUPPORTS, RECE CH ED REFERENCE DRAWINGOM. !IVY APPROVED DATE SVM REveION EV APPROVED WTI a erw Nn Rev. EN1 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT ❑ AUBURN, WA. 98002 ❑ EVERETT, WA. 98201 ❑ KENT, WA. 98031 ❑ PORTLAND, OR. 97220 ❑ RENTON, WA. 98055 ❑ SEATTLE, WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITY 76116 DESIGN *56011 SPDCIPICAT1ON 6 APPROVED APPROVED W DEPT. DATE 0057.EV DATE CHEC7ED ENDS. CHECKED APPROVED ' VPROVED SUBTITLE ION:.... AN 4 !;'TAIL'S nTIE I I B1,017 two T �( 2- 45 7755 F;a.ST MAO'.CINAL, WAY 50. w Ag1iIN4 •rOCI A IZDSZNCIVD OYES \Sind.° 1 IADFtP• Sme N rlRDIrf 1 M„t Mtw SFP 19 20117 I01517T 1 IAst N,MD17 D7j5 779 *1251L101144 1 QAIDIifDh_PBnrss._PRDR UPPER MODULE Gel LINA (R07F; IiL "� M.D E • 41-0 "O. G. _JNOTGI-I 4x4 FOR M.L. 11/211 x ect.u.iN BEARINAE ILZB WHERE REQb.4FJ: PLAN SIZE AND LGGAZION. PROVIDE 2 -yV,o FIOLl2'7 FOR 2041 NAIL- TO DOT1 4 OP MIOROL'AM UPPER MODULE FLOOR LOWER MODULE Oestu NA MIGROLAM OEAM. 5EE PLAN FOR 55IZE AND I.XA-1'ION 2.4 ENRAGES e 8'- O "O.G. h� BOLT TO COLUMN OF AD T JACEN M DULE,AT -TOp ► 1,.ypHearHT GOLIJMN,1 -4E.G # 2 -2ND VF-L. GON€T 'IRADE.SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION. NAIL 2xa WITH IOd NAIL75 PKOVIDE 4OLID BEARINA ZOP 4 60'TTOM OF ALL -EJM GOMRJNENTS �JOIYi2 RIM TT I2x_FLOOR JOIST e) ��I '' I�1 WOOD UMN5A8 E. 5EE SHBET *3•5 FORLAGA710N 2x4 BRACEY' E 8'(O "O.G. III COLumNBEARNA Kea D 4'E PLAN FL( �WHE AND LALATION. PROaVIKDE 2 -rte# HOLES FOR 20d NAIL'? TO BOTTOM OF MIGROLAM i , I SOLID WO BLGOKINAI UNDER COLUMN ABOVE.PROVIDE AHT FIT TO TOP OF WOOD _I I P7 r BELOW MIN:PM 2 xt2i_aOR. 9T ICI I �J 1 P aICI I 7 11 thilits 501_79. SEE ABOVE mrtrron A95 FRAMINdt FRAMING/ ANGI4910 45e ABOVE t LOWER MOl7LL° FLGiDR NEW CONC. FTAI. YE°- PLAN 15a911N11 (ONO. ON t RAPE •4x 11 -0" REAR GGWEL 4_ EACH •xe, SECTIO/ N 74•'= 11_OD 11 6x8WCO17 PO9r FJ\GH 5117E L�F MAICRIAAE LINE; *TESL iC.I/4 moivrLoRe BFJWVNfi YHEAR WALL. 5EE PL N MARRIA6IE UN E: Om LIPPER r----I MODULE GEIUN6, PL-'%420 EDGE NAIL:NA 5EE FRAMIN( NOTES AND 5HEAR. WALL 4GHEPULE BELLY •AND ° PL.)Wt7017 NAIL PER SHEAR wMaLd- 40- IEDULE FOR LOWER MODULE TIE 9TRAP5T6Z24 @ MARRIAgE LINE BETWEEN MODULES 5EE "NOTE" BELOW FOR NAILINA PLYWOVO EGlGIE NAILINA� 5EE FRAMIN.Aj NOTE' AND L LE tc WAL BBI.LYPAWP. Yi' PLYWOoR405 FDN PLAN AND NAIL PER NFAR WALL .*SCHEDULE Fb "pf ANCHOR EYJL15' e. 40. "ac. �- •'>GOWF Sei 16°0.4. E 2 - *P IN BAJTTOM *HEAR WAIL PANF_t_INA1 NAIL PER SGHEDU. -° EGTION 2.4 HOKIZ. ELK .5 PLYNA42 D JOINT* 9IEEL TE VT>'.AP 9x221°! BY51MPrJEON OR gOVAL 1r4 VERTCAL F27r71TGN, WITH 5 -1041 NNL'f FA.519E OF MARRIAd.E UNE.A PPLY ONE PETWEEN VPPER MODtJLES AND 2 BETWEEN LOWER MODULES F 1 f. (8i1 GONG. GORE. 1 - *4 coKT. IN TOP i'oUt:I1-40,,i1vd41 ; `II LL 11Ii. : ;.41:,il r: NF 1 E<E 1 l651a' J`! . 1 . E6."-11 ON 'SALE' 3411 °p -O" PLYW4017 ELWE NAILINGE FRAh4lNA NOTES ANDSHEAR WALL 541 ICDULE TIE STRAP 576224 MARRIAJ1E LINE BETWtE:N NA7ULE5 rt i. W PLYWa7DTYP EXTERIOR v1ALL5 NAIL PER YI•E/' • WALL SCHEDULE PLYWa7D EDGE UPPER NAIUN6:.5EE mouvix FRAMINAI NOTE'' FL_G10R WALL 5e- HEGULa LOWER MODULE CEILING, Lowoz MODULE FiGJ7R EXIST.GGNG. D°LL)' 56417 I�R PL,YWa7D NAIL PEK SHPAR WALL SCHEDULE POR LOWER MODULE Ir I IE I4 i ; I , MIGKOIAM 0EAM ARID LINE ,BEYOND WHERE IAPPUGABLE 91E EELOW FOR 'INAI.JN6% MODULE 'LINA c) • PROVIDE IN -WALL GOLUMJS e MIGKOIJ'.M !WA- .M4' AY REO'D SEE UFIFEIC MGDIJLE GEIUNGt FRAM:NA, PLAN N uFR'ER MODULE FLLF7IC TIE 9-.'9r224 Gd MARRIA66��E Lrt�E 9ETWEEN MODULErj rw.OVIDE EVEN BEARINAI TO BOTTOM OF MIGROIAM(TYP.) MULTI 5T1A GOL-UATI 5 61RID LI•.E WHERE REQW KEDR5ES LOWS MODULE G7 =PUN! . FKAMINAj F1AN) NAILIN� C MOVUt;E LINA rE •NO1E' -OW* FOR SOLID VA • CLrn (lw G WOOD GOLLIMNS Ae.WE SEE 4HEETSS -5 FOR LOCATION GKOLAM BEAM ARID LINE ISEYON9 WHEKE APPLJGABL -E GAEAR WALL FOUNoRnoN PLAN t wALL 4* CRIPPLE WALLS MYHEA WALL. wHVIE PLAN MID EEP.IC WALL .5.4. LOVER MOR ILE FL -Gt7R • PLYWa7D EDAE NAILJNA.I 5EE F .AMINE NOTES StepLYWdJD SNEAK WALLY (TYP!GA L ,INTERIOR) WHERE APPLIGAB' 5EE UPPER MODULE FLAW- AND 5-IEAR WALL SGHEPULE. IG cl TOENAIL* 5 GEOG. (TYP UPPER MODLJLE- TO 2x 10) 2x1040NT. SPIKE TO LOWER MODULE WITH Pad NAIL* w O.G. (TYP) Eel:* dr I° A65 FRAMING ANOHOR5 BY 5IMPStON OR EQLVvL EACH .,iDE E* 21 O.G. P1 AMP* GylOe310.45 ARID* 2, 0,4 11:717E4AIL WITH IOd NAILS'5 dmoz. G� NON= '4M•IEAR WALLS lb`' FLYWa70 SFIFAR WALLS WHEJCE ArPL JGA6LJ =. 4jEE LONER MODULE PLAN' AND YI -EAR WALL SGHEDLILE A -35 FRAMINA ANCHORS W' 41M> c N OR E2.,EA.51De 5 01-doz. e amp, G} I O AND a 5-0.'e 61Rlp/. 2,5 ►II :TOE'NAJL WIT-I IOd NNL`7 l3 G'OG. a NOIJ- 5HEAR WAI L`7 3/6" R.Y4 DOID SHEATHIN6b C SHEAR WALL', ONLY. 5EE FoL.44PATGN FLAN FOR LLY.ATON NAIL PER SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE f i 2 JO-'2JT NI9 62 R IMM AT9UD VI PFt2RT TO FoliNw_ T10N i O MATCH �iuPI�RT COLUMN ABOVE- 5,,c! LINE' - WHEKE R t LeN1-4wEKA FRA M MODA N6 Pt. NE ) •i A • NO1E: Woe -11-6 `TAPUNfj OPTION ON:-J', FDIC SMEAR WALL PANEL EI7 E NNLIN6U WHERE NNLINA ISAPPUED TO WIDE O?A 5 ALETHIOKNEY5. OF mini .J01'•r. IL Try ✓✓wE�GoTION 5., bl pld E:LT 5 5 -G" 53 aRos. k10ANP'd 4'-0 REMMAINPER Yid NAILS 6•O•C. 'b'PAB. -OH QC. WITH MIN 4' ENB. INTO E5CT61. A.ONCRE:TE. INCREASE ANCHOR 9EJJLTZ ATSHI.AR WALLS' SEE FWW2flON FLAN 2• Poe 1e,;'04 TYPICAL - _I6EROUT FAD Ah Real IR NOTE: MAINTAIN 4 "MIN. ED, AE CLEARANCE FROM ANGFYJR BOLT TO ANy CRACK IN EXISTIN( cONGICETE �jVvB. r✓EGTION GXiALE: � �4 ° °r-DI RECEV COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . •REFERENCE DRAWING SVM REVISION I. APPROVED DATE SYM REVISION IV APPROVED DATE FACILITIES DEPARTMENT AUBURN. WA. 98002 EVERETT, WA. 98201 O KENT, WA. 98031 O PORTLAND. OR. 97220 ❑ RENTON, WA. 98055 ❑ SEATTLE, . WA. 98124 ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND'OR SPECIFICATION 5 APPROVED DRAWN SV [NECKED otht,OING rRAMING 1=Ls.N5 AP /ROVED IV DEPT DATE MGR. CNEtRED APPROVED --APPROVED 1111.1 6LOG. 1 ENG TWO 51VRY McvIGAe, 7-755 EAS r M4gJ INe,L WAY 90. 2 45 eg krrL e V✓Q.5I11NGr0N In ow+ asto Rev IN, 5500_ -lca 1-115 • OwG VO 2.45- 155Gb• AS -UIL AS . -27 S APPROVED DATE APPR0000 FACILITIES DEPARTMENT EMOVAL o AUBURN, WA. 98002 EVERETT, WA. 98201 \Tamil 0 KENT, WA. 98031 / 0 SEATTLE, WA. 98124 9978025205 0AT:Aiozierticw,Z Amami 00 RENTON, WA. D, OR. ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED DRAWR By , APPROVED By DEPT DATE ONAU MTV DEVELORALAT FACILITIES DEPARTMENT EMOVAL o AUBURN, WA. 98002 \ID EVERETT, WA. 98201 \Tamil 0 KENT, WA. 98031 / 0 SEATTLE, WA. 98124 9978025205 0AT:Aiozierticw,Z Amami 00 RENTON, WA. D, OR. ACCEPTABILITY THIS DESIGN AND/OR SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED DRAWR By , APPROVED By DEPT DATE SECOND FLOOR PLAN DOOR SCHEDULE REMOVAL ELEVATIONS SECTIONS STAIRS FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN MACDONALD MILLER CO UTILITY PLAN SECOND FLOOR PIPING C =J C =J C=D CJ C-J C_J r --1 C =J C =J CJ CJ C=J o_ cJ CB36-213 L--7--,- , . } T—/7-. 2-4--- ^- -- -- - Vi— }<s� -6� Ls c/ l s -- - -' -- - -9 - -� • 4 = ,` F-1 ,—` = ` -$' I ,o-s4 1 El CB36 -182 GSTS(C)I I I CB 6 -I8 11, •. 11CB32 -1851 - -- C832 -184❑--- ,1 -- -46STS — — 1-4'5N A 6" SAN CONNECTION INV= 6. BUILDINGS 2 -40/44 i I SAN 1 u VALVE'11 C836 -164 10"F CB36 -172 RI TION(, - -i.: TL E 24-ST 0"F '5(0) M136 -46/ ) 'ti 1 � 10 c83E -466± DUCT 3 -2 "C( SPARE ),1 -4 "C(3 #350),1- 4"C(SPAR,E) DUCT 2-1-C,1-4X(31350) arui rl.gr■ 3 "CW 3/4" SCHEDULE El0 PVC, WITH 3+10 & 1110 GROUND, 'TYPE 09HW FROM 8-18 GUAR. HOUSE CIRCUIT C /Ba,10D,12c —� ER C8 MH 12"ST5(C) v 1 uH 12SIS(C) X 1 DOUBLE CHECK - VALVE, ASSEMBLY IN PIT DUCT 3 -2 C(SPARE)_1_4_C1313501,1 _4"C(SPARE _________ 13.800 I2-ST5(C) • m 011C1 2- I'CJ -4 "0(38350) • m tt'srs(c MH - • AIH 12 "STS(C) MH EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH LEGEND 000 0 40' UGHT POLE WITH (2) 250W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LUMINAIRES. SEE "LIGHTING SPECIFICATION ". AIMING DIRECTION FOR ROTATABLE OPTICS IS INDICATED BY ARROW. OPEN - BOTTOM ELECTRICAL HANDHOLE BURIED ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. CONDUIT TYPE, SIZE. AND CONDUCTORS SHOWN ON PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. CONDUIT TO BE 3/4" SCHEDULE 80 PVC EMT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • 2. ALL WIRE TO BE 110 XHHW UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. THE FOLLOWING COLOR CODING OF CONDUCTORS SHALL BE OBSERVED ON ALL CIRCUITS 600 -VOLTS OR LESS. LARGE SIZE CONDUCTORS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH COLORED TAPE WHERE EVER VISABLE. 120/708V 277/480V "A 0 (LEFT BUS IN PANEL) BLACK BROWN "B" 0 C ((CENTER BUS IN PANEL) RED ORANGE "C" RIGHT BUS IN PANEL) BLUE YELLOW NEUTRAL WHITE CRAY EQUIPMENT GROUND GR ISOLATED GROUND GRN EEN /YEL GRN /YEL 4. MARK CIRCUIT IDENTIFICATION ON INSIDE OF COVER FOR HANDHOLE THAT IS BUILT INTO LIGHT POLE. PROVIDE PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION OF CONDUITS IN OPEN - BOTTOM HANDHOLES. 5. INSTALL NEW OR 'REVISED PANEL SCHEDULES UPON COMPLETION OF JOB. CONSTRUCTION NOTES . 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING 51TE LIGHTING CIRCUIT IN EXISTING 4 FT HANDHOLE. EXTEND NEW CONDUIT AND WIRE AS INDICATED ON PLAN, TO SUPPLY 2 NEW UGHTING POLES. WHERE POSSIBLE. RUN CONDUIT IN TRENCH CREATED FOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REMOVAL. PROVIDE AN OPEN BOTTOM HANDHOLE AS A PULL POINT. CHRISTY N9BOX WITH N9D CONCRETE UD, OR APPROVED EQUNALENT. PROVIDE FOUNDATION, POLE, AND LUMINAIRES IN TWO PLACES. SEE "LIGH1ING SPECIFICATION ". EXTEND UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND WIRES FROM NEW HANDHOLE. PROVIDE WIRING OF LUMINAIRES FOR A COMPLETE, FUNCTIONAL INSTALLATION. ROTATE LUMINAIRE OPTICS SO THAT MAXIMUM LIGHT THROW IS IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN BY ARROW. CUT DOWN ANY TREE TRUNKS WITHIN A 10 FT RADIUS OF P011. CUT DOWN ANY TREE BRANCHES WITHIN A 10 FT RADIUS OF A LUMINAIRE. —JOB SOE OCT 15 20D1 cV Ftllt +iT ®g/9 KEY PLAN.. SCALE: NONE sru sr APPROYEO 841E SYM 84 /YPRD+ED DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING J8170514 -00 KNOX 10.02.07 OLATAVWFAW ® • C iii 1 EXPIRES. 10 -25 -08 ACCEPTABILITY o WDONOVAN WR 1105 DESIGN AND /08 F MEVELO SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED APPROVED BY DEPT. DAIS D DONOVMI SUBtf1E ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN CU N4 REVISION J5170514 -00 SYMBOL DATE 10.02.07 CH CKLD G 11EMAN APPRD�LD F WEAVER APPROVED • DOLE CML MASTER DEMO 2 -45 AND REPLACE WITH PARKING 2 -YD YARD PLANT2, WA SHEET - C460E 800 NO. DRG NO 170514 -00. C0"P Ho. 2- Y0.-C4AOE , 1 1 1 WRK6271: 09/26/07 13:15 FIRST FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES LIGHTING PLAN GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES LIGHTING PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN . ROOF PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN ROOF CURB PARTIAL PLAN MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE ELEVATION SECTION POWER FEED SECTION DETAIL DUCT SCHEDULE TYPICAL CONDUIT SUPPORT DETAILS