The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E08-001 - SABEY CORPORATION - 5 STRUCTURES DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UPSABEY CLEANUP SEPA 10230 EMWS E08 -001 File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: City of'ukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E08 -001 01/16/2008 04/03/2008 ISSUED Applicant: SABEY CORPORATION Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: SEPA/environmental review for voluntary clean-up and demolition at 10230 East Marginal Way S. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: 10230 EAST MARGINAL WY S TUKW 0423049102 SECTION 3, TWNSHP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Apri I / 7, 2tib Z. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. / Jack Pact Responsibl Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. .The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS -4/07 E08 -001 Printed: 04-02 -2008 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF DECISION To: David Kang, Sabey Corporation 10230 East Marginal LLC, Owner State Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor PROJECT: Demolition of five structures on the site and cleanup including removal of hazardous substances and treatment of contaminated soil. FILE NUMBERS: E08 -001 ASSOCIATED FILES: D07 -476, D07 -477 (demolition permits) APPLICANT: David Kang, Business Development, Sabey Corporation REQUEST: Request for environmental review for demolition and site remediation. LOCATION: 10230 East Marginal Way S, including two parcels 042304 -9102 and 042304 -9015. This notice is to confirm the decision reached by Tukwila's SEPA Official to issue a Determination of Non - significance (DNS) for the above project based on the environmental checklist and the underlying permit applications. Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at: Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Jaimie Reavis, who may be contacted at (206) 431 -3659 for further information. The decision is appealable to the Superior Court pursuant to the Judicial Review of Land Use Decisions, Revised Code of Washington (RCW 36.70C). JR H: \SEPA\E08- 001_Sabey Demo\SabeyNOD_DNS.DOC Page 1 of 1 04/02/2008 1:08:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File No: E08 -001 I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action is to demolish five existing structures on the site: a garage, a warehouse, an office, a shed, and a multi - purpose canopy. Soil remediation, including removal of hazardous substances and treatment of contaminated soil is also proposed with this project. This work will be done according to an agreement between the applicant and the State Department of Ecology (DOE) under DOE's Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) authorized by the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: 12030 E Marginal Way Cleanup and Demolition Project Applicant: David D. Kang, Business Development, Sabey Corporation Location: 10230 E Marginal Way S, on the east side of East Marginal Way S south of S Norfolk Street. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation: Light Industrial (LI) The following information was considered as part of review of this application: 1. SEPA Checklist and ESA screening checklist (February 7, 2008). 2. Asbestos Inspection Report — NW Auto Wrecking, prepared by Argus Pacific (July 24, 2007). 3. Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Application Form from the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program, and VCP Agreement (July 15, 2007) 4. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Seattle /Tukwila, Washington, prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc., Environmental Consultants (July 2007) JR Page 1 of 7 H :\SEPA\E08- 001_Sabey DemoT08 -001 Sabey DNS_SR.doc 04/02/2008 9:53 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington, 98188; Phone: (206) 431 -3659. III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197 -11 -800. IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL This property is part of approximately 33 acres that received a Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezone in December 2007 from Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H) to Light Industrial (LI). When the property was designated as MIC/H, it was subject to a Planned Action environmental review, but became subject to standard environmental review once the Comprehensive Plan designation/zoning was changed to LI. The proposal is to demolish five structures on the site including a garage, warehouse, office, shed, and multi - purpose canopy. The site is approximately 6.8 acres, and was used from the late 1950's until 2007 as an auto - wrecking yard. The project site is comprised of three parcels, one of which is located in the City of Seattle. The portion of the site that is within Tukwila and is the subject of this permit is approximately 3.3 acres, and is zoned Light Industrial (LI). A range of hazardous substances are located on the site, including but not limited to asbestos used in construction materials for the building on the site; metals (lead, arsenic, cadmium) from the crushing of car batteries on the site; and petroleum hydrocarbons from the storage and dismantling of automobiles, and from above - ground and underground storage tanks containing stove oil and gasoline. A Remediation Plan prepared by Dalton, Olmsted, & Fuglevand, Inc., Environmental Consultants, outlines the approach the applicant will take to remove and treat hazardous materials and contaminated soils. Additionally, the applicant has signed an agreement with the State Department of Ecology for participation in the Voluntary Cleanup Program, a program through which the Department of Ecology provides informal site - specific technical consultations for remediation work at sites containing hazardous waste. JR Page 2 of 7 H: \SEPA\E08 -001_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SRdoc 04/02/2008 9:53 AM V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. A. BACKGROUND: 1 -4 - Concur with checklist. 5 - The construction will follow issuance of a SEPA determination and after obtaining all required permits from the City of Tukwila or other agencies. 6 -8 - Concur with checklist. 9 - In addition to demolition permits (D07 -476 and D07 -477), the applicant will need to obtain the following permits: 1) An NPDES construction permit from the State Department of Ecology (DOE), required since more than one acre will be disturbed with this project. Demolition permits shall not be issued until the applicant submits proof that an application for this permit has been filed. 2) A permit for demolition from the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA). The applicant shall call PSAPCA at (206) 689 -4058 for more information on how to apply for this permit. 3) A separate hauling permit from Public Works is required for hauling contaminated dirt. Refer to Public Works Bulletin A -4 (enclosed) for permit submittal. 4) Applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tukwila Fire Department for removal of above - ground and underground storage tanks. 10 -12 - Concur with checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: a -e - Concur with checklist. JR Page3of7 H:\SEPA\E08 -001_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SR.doc 04/02/2008 9:53 AM f - The applicant shall submit a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan with demolition permit materials to manage any impacts related to the proposed work. g - Concur with checklist. h - The temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan required with demolition permits will determine the measures for implementation to reduce or control erosion and other impacts to the earth. 2. Air: a - Applicant is required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency to address any emission to the air associated with this project, including the demolition of structures containing asbestos. b - Concur with checklist. c - Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and follow all state and federal laws related to reducing/controlling emissions to the air. 3. Water: a(1) -a(6) - Concur with checklist. b(1) -b(2) - Concur with checklist. c(1) -c(2) - Best Management Practices must be followed to ensure that no construction debris enters the storm drainage system. The applicant shall apply for a DOE construction permit. Additionally, the project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. All impacts associated with drainage will be mitigated as part of the construction permit. d - The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual drainage requirements. Additionally, the applicant shall obtain a construction permit from the Department of Ecology. All impacts associated with drainage will be , mitigated as part of the construction permit. 4. Plants: a -d - Concur with checklist. 5. Animals: a -d - Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c - Concur with checklist. JR Page4of7 H:\SEPA\E08 -001_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SR.doc 04/02!2008 9:53 AM Environmental Health: a - The applicant shall coordinate with the Tukwila Fire Department to obtain required permits for removal of above - ground and underground storage tanks. (1 -2) - Concur with checklist. b (1) - Concur with checklist. b(2) -b(3) - The project must meet City of Tukwila noise ordinance requirements. Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts associated with the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a -d - Concur with checklist. e - A rezone was recently approved for the site. The current zoning classification is now Light Industrial (LI). f - The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the site was recently changed from Manufacturing /Industrial Center/Heavy (MIC/H) to Light Industrial (LI) g-1 - Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a -c - Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a -c - Concur with checklist. 11. Light and Glare: a -d - Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a -c - Concur with checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c - Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation: a -g - Concur with checklist. 15. Public Services: a -b - Concur with checklist. 16. Utilities: a - Concur with checklist. JR Page 5 of 7 H: \SEPA\E08 -0O1_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SRdoc 04/02/2008 9:53 AM b - According to the Remediation Plan prepared by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc., existing utilities and wells will be located and marked in the field prior to the start of excavation. The applicant shall coordinate with the Washington State Department of Ecology for abandonment of wells on the project site. VI. COMMENTS: In response to the notice of application, written comments were received from the Washington State Department of Ecology (see Attachment A). Ecology's comments were related to (1) ensuring that the applicant follow State regulatory requirements for designation and management of hazardous wastes generated from the proposed demolition activity; (2) ensuring that the applicant follow State regulatory requirements for management of hazardous wastes generated through the use, maintenance, or repair of any construction equipment; (3) the possibility of soil contamination on the site, and ensuring that the required proper steps to mitigate this contamination are taken; and (4) ensuring that the applicant address issues of hazardous waste designation, storage, management, and proper disposal as a result of the proposed work. Ecology's comments were forwarded to the applicant for review and response. Responses to Ecology's comments were provided by Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. on behalf of the Sabey Corporation (see Attachment B). In response to Ecology's comments, the applicant's representative responded by acknowledging that the Sabey Corporation is aware of the requirements to designate and handle hazardous wastes generated during work on the site in an appropriate manner. In preparation for demolition activity on this site, an asbestos inspection report and a remediation were prepared, which outline the types and location of hazardous substances on the site, and the steps that will be taken to manage or mitigate these substances. The applicant submitted a remedial plan to the Department of Ecology in July 2007 as part of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). The applicant plans to implement the remediation plan once it receives all necessary permits. As suggested in the comment letter, a copy of Ecology's comment letter will be attached to the demolition permits for this project. VII. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -340 a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued for this project. This DNS is based on impacts identified within the JR Page 6 of 7 H:\SEPA\E08 -001_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SRdoc 04/02/2008 9:53 AM environmental checklist, attachments, technical reports, and the above Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File No. E08 -001, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City of Tukwila for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Prepared by: Jaimie Reavis, Assistant Planner Date: April 3, 2008 JR Page 7 of 7 H:\SEPA\E08 -001_Sabey Demo\E08 -001 Sabey DNS_SR.doc 04/02/2008 9:56 AM STATE OF WASHINGTON) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY r'41. • :UNiry Northwest Regional Office 0 3190 160th Avenue SE 0 Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 0 (425) 649 -7000 February 14, 2008 Ms. Jaimie Reavis City of Tukwila 6300 South Center Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Reavis: RE: Determination of Non - Significance for independent remedial action regarding demolition and cleanup of: (former) Northwest Auto Wrecking yard at 10230 E Marginal Way South, City of Tukwila, Project # E08 -001 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the SEPA checklist issued February 8, 2008, for the proposed facility and site modifications. We have reviewed the checklist and have the following comments: • Any contractor demolishing or constructing buildings or other structures, foundations, etc., is subject to the State regulatory requirements of designation and appropriate management of any hazardous wastes generated as a result of such work. • Hazardous wastes generated through the use, maintenance, or repair of any construction equipment, vehicles, earth working equipment, paving equipment, etc., are subject to the same regulatory requirements for appropriate management. • Proper steps to mitigate soil contamination and/or cleanup of contaminated soils are required. As this was a former junk yard, soil contaminated with benzene and/or solvent is possible. • Issues of hazardous waste designation, storage, management, and proper disposal should be addressed as a result of the work proposed in this checklist. A Hazardous Waste permit is not required of this project unless dangerous waste will be received, treated, stored for greater then ninety (90) days, or disposed on site. "Ecology suggests, but does not require, that a copy of this letter be attached to any building/demolition permit for this project." Here is a link to Ecology's website that shows dangerous waste rules and other resources on demolition debris: http:// www. ecy. wa. gov/ programs /hwtr /demodebris /index.html If you have any questions please call me at our Hazardous Waste Toxics Reduction (HWTR) Program at (425) 649-7140. Once again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Br .., Rachel Best, Environmental Specialist Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program RB:SA cc: Julie Sellick, NWRO f'T1T1 A .1101/1/1OAAA•f 1 Attachment A • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants 6034 N Star Rd. • Ferndale, Washington 98248 Telephone (360) 380 -0862 (FAX 360- 380 -0862) Cell (206) 498 -6616 e-mail: mdalton @dofnw.com (Kirkland, WA Office — 425- 827 -4588) MEMORANDUM TO: David Kang — Sabey Corporation FROM: Matt Dalton DATE: February 27, 2008 SUBJECT: SEPA Permitting — Former NW Auto Wrecking Site City of Tukwilla — Project #E08 -001 REF. NO: SAB- 029 -01 CC: Dave Cooper - DOF On behalf of Sabey Corporation, we reviewed the Department of Ecology comment letter dated February 14, 2008 for the referenced site. As requested, here are our responses. Comment: Any contractor demolishing or constructing buildings or other structures, foundations, etc., is subject to State regulatory requirements of designation and appropriate management of any hazardous wastes generated as a result of such work Response: Sabey Corporation is aware of the requirements to designate and handle in an appropriate manner any hazardous wastes generated as a result of the site work. While DOF is not directly involved in the demolition work, it is our understanding that the appropriate surveys will be conducted prior to demolition work being completed. Furthermore, DOF has been retained by Sabey to assist in completing a characterization of the site environmental conditions and assist in completing any necessary site remediation (see additional discussion of this issue below). Comment: Hazardous wastes generated through the use, maintenance, or repair of any construction equipment, vehicles, earth working equipment, paving equipment, etc. are subject to the same regulatory requirements for appropriate management. Response: Sabey notes this comment. Attachment B s;.�uJ "' s d ice aSS In *OM SS. ClwrON MOM PM f O,1� araat u1Rt uairsrm eery. u.,.t MISS. areg ' - 1 gnaw ors \{ �` vow ` • "-�•ir ME Q mss. Y , 11\ •ale AN O. c�rm+.14) whoop oato P Was mailed to ach of the addresses listed on this year 20 �, day of �rin the Dept. Of Community City of AFFIDAVIT OF Development Tukwila DISTRIBUTION I, 15/ n Qb]ERBY DECLARE LL THAT: Notice of Public Hearing . Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice v /e, Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Project Number: Notice of Action 0 ! 60 / Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda . 7 Notice of Application /7 L Shoreline Mgmt Permit 0 / !i// Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ — FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 7 Other /& , t i e / -'C/ 1 ' Was mailed to ach of the addresses listed on this year 20 �, day of �rin the Project Name: 51r/2J2_ / e v /e, 6 Project Number: 0 ! 60 / Mailer's Signature: C ice• 7 Person requesting mailing: /7 L 0 ,Pn J e9 0 / !i// \ David Kang 12201 Tukwila International Blvd Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 -5121 10230 East Marginal LLC 12201 Tukwila International Blvd Fourth Floor Tukwila, WA 98168 -5121 Raael Best Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMI T AIL INGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE Nf ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY O U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS &REC Q5QK.C. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY. ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) ()WEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ()PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT () COMCAST SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE () POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING () BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM" ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM'" ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM **Send SEPA Checklist and full set of. plans w/ NOA MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHECKLIST.DOC ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. (. DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHO ELAND DIV, NW Regional Office ( jJi2 ( teSf) 4J )EPT OF ECO OGY, SEPA DIVISI ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT (.) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE* ( ) P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION* * SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW SBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR ERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant ' *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division.— SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application fora Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the fmal decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to the NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) — Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHECKLIST.DOC Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants 6034 N Star Rd. • Ferndale, Washington 98248 Telephone (360) 380 -0862 (FAX 360- 380 -0862) Cell (206) 498 -6616 e-mail: mdalton @dofnw.com (Kirkland, WA Office — 425- 827 -4588) MEMORANDUM TO: David Kang - Sabey Corporation FROM: Matt Dalton DATE: February 27, 2008 SUBJECT: SEPA Permitting - Former NW Auto Wrecking Site City of Tukwilla - Project #E08 -001 REF. NO: SAB- 029 -01 CC: Dave Cooper -. DOF On behalf of Sabey Corporation, we reviewed the Department of Ecology comment letter dated February 14, 2008 for the referenced site. As requested, here are our responses. Comment: Any contractor demolishing or constructing buildings or other structures, foundations, etc., is subject to State regulatory requirements of designation and appropriate management of any hazardous wastes generated as a result of such work. Response: Sabey Corporation is aware of the requirements to designate and handle in an appropriate manner any hazardous wastes generated as a result of the site work. While DOF is not directly involved in the demolition work, it is our understanding that the appropriate surveys will be conducted prior to demolition work being completed. Furthermore, DOF has been retained by Sabey to assist in completing a characterization of the site environmental conditions and assist in completing any necessary site remediation (see additional discussion of this issue below). Comment: Hazardous wastes generated through the use, maintenance, or repair of any construction equipment, vehicles, earth working equipment, paving equipment, etc. are subject to the same regulatory requirements for appropriate management. Response: Sabey notes this comment. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevan0c. Responses to Ecology Comments — SEPA Checklist NW Auto Wrecking Site, Tukwila, Washington Page 2 February 27, 2008 • Comment: Proper steps to mitigate soil contamination and/or cleanup of contaminated soils are required. As this was a former junkyard, soil contamination with benzene and/or solvent is possible. Response: Soil and possibly groundwater contamination is present on the site. Sabey has retained DOF to assist in site characterization and cleanup. Any cleanup will be completed under Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). As part of the VCP, a remedial plan was submitted to Ecology in July 2007 that will be implemented once the necessary permits are received. Comment: Issues of hazardous waste designation, storage, management, and proper disposal should be addressed as a result of the work proposed in this checklist. Response: These issues are being addressed as part of the site remedial activities. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office • 3190 160th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (425) 649 -7000 t _.. r-IVED FEB 2 0 2008 JNiTY c:V .)PtdENT February 14, 2008 Ms. Jaimie Reavis City of Tukwila 6300 South Center Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Reavis: RE: Determination of Non - Significance for independent remedial action regarding demolition and cleanup of: (former) Northwest Auto Wrecking yard at 10230 E Marginal Way South, City of Tukwila, Project # E08 -001 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the SEPA checklist issued February 8, 2008, for the proposed facility and site modifications. We have reviewed the checklist and have the following comments: • Any contractor demolishing or constructing buildings or other structures, foundations, etc., is subject to the State regulatory requirements of designation and appropriate management of any hazardous wastes generated as a result of such work. Hazardous wastes generated through the use, maintenance, or repair of any construction equipment, vehicles, earth working equipment, paving equipment, etc., are subject to the same regulatory requirements for appropriate management. • Proper steps to mitigate soil contamination and/or cleanup of contaminated soils are required. As this was a former junk yard, soil contaminated with benzene and/or solvent is possible. _ • Issues of hazardous waste designation, storage, management, and proper disposal should be addressed as a result of the work proposed in this checklist. A Hazardous Waste permit is not required of this project unless dangerous waste will be received, treated, stored for greater then ninety (90) days, or disposed on site. "Ecology suggests, but does not require, that a copy of this letter be attached to any building/demolition permit for this project." Here is a link to Ecology's website that shows dangerous waste rules and other resources on demolition debris: http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov/ programs /hwtr /demodebris /index.html If you have any questions please call me at our Hazardous Waste Toxics Reduction (HWTR) Program at (425) 649-7140. Once again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment.. Sincerely, .114‘., Rachel Best, Environmental Specialist Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction Program RB:SA cc: Julie Sellick, NWRO SEPA #200800931 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION: David Kang, representing Sabey Corporation, has filed an application for SEPA Environmental Review for demolition and environmental cleanup of the site located at 10230 East Marginal Way S on behalf of property owner 10230 East Marginal LLC, a subsidiary of the Sabey Corporation. The project site is made up of parcel numbers 042304 -9102 and 042304-9015, and is approximately 3.5 acres. Formerly, the site was used for an auto wrecking yard (Northwest Auto Wrecking). The demolition includes removal of five structures (including a 3490 square. foot (SF) warehouse, 1847 SF office,_ 1523 SF garage, 2306 SF shed, and 388 SF canopy). Concrete and asphalt pavement demolition as well as soil remediation will be included as part of this permit. Projects applied for include: E08 -001, SEPA Environmental Review; D07 -476, Demolition Permit; D07 -477, Demolition Permit FILES.: AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The application is available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. The comment period for this Notice of Application is 14 days. Written comments must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Friday, February 22nd, 2008. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Jaimie Reavis at (206) 431 -3659, jreavis@ci.tukwila.wa.us or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: January 16, 2008 Notice of Completeness Issued: January 29, 2008 Notice of Application Issued: February 8, 2008 VNo Goals Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 2010.1( day of b in the Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting .Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Project Name: Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Project Number: 4, 0g3 Short Subdivision Agenda 6t(' Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ _ FAX To Seattle Times • Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this year 2010.1( day of b in the Project Name: e_af D./) / Project Number: 4, 0g3 Mailer's Signature: 6t(' /X. Person requesting mailing: (1-/2/ /.,,J &ej h 4 25011 CityGlS Copyright © 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the propietary property of the contributor supplied under licerr.:e and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. OWNER_NAME '-TENANT "TENANT CHASE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT L TENANT TENANT BUTY LP \ 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC \ 10230 EAST MARGINAL LLC `..--TENANT ■ MASSA,BOB \ ROACH,JOHN S BOEING COMPANY .-/Z3o((q0/ OWNER_ADDRESS OWNER_C 10200 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA 10230 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE 10315 E MARGINAL WAY S - TUKWILA 10320 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA 10325 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA 1150 ALKI AVE SW 4 SEATTLE 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TUKWILA 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 4TH -FL TUKWILA 3301 S NORFOLK ST 372 S REYNOLDS RD 3720 80TH AVE SE PO BOX 3707 SEATTLE OTH ELLO MERCER I SEATTLE SEATTLE VIVVV,IrPq* 1111111111111111111111=11 3 0 0 I I CityGIS Copyright © 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information containe,d herein is the proprietary property of the contributor supplied under licerke and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. OWNER_NAME CHASE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT BUTY LP 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC 10230 EAST MARGINAL LLC MASSA, BOB ROACH,JOHN S MICHIGAN PROPERTIES EAST MARGINAL ASSOCIATES BOEING COMPANY TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENAN -T TENANT TENANT OWNER_ADDRESS L 10315 E MARGINAL WAY S 1 -150 ALKI AVE SW 4 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 4TH -FL 372 S REYNOLDS RD 3720 80TH AVE SE 5301 2ND AVE S 700 N 36TH ST PO BOX 3707 3301 S NORFOLK ST 10230 E MARGINAL WAY S 10035 E MARGINAL WAY 10016 E MARGINAL WAY 10320 E MARGINAL WAY S 1,1 1 ! 10325 E MARGINAL WAY S 10200 E MARGINAL WAY S (CN OWNER_C TUKWILA SEATTLE TUKWILA TUKWILA OTHELLO MERCER I SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA TUKWILA CHECST: • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PER• MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( ) DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION (,) K.C. DEPT. OF PARKS & REC KC. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY QWEST 7'SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( ) PUGET SOUND ENERGY ( ) HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) COMCAST SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT C't .LUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: (OP,UBLIC WORKS () FIRE ( ) PO IL CEO *FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV, NW Regional Office EPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( *) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLISTW/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE 1�0 Ai C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES J?4 FOSTER LIBRARY ( ) K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ()HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITYOF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* OTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL () SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE fQ1MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE r jCULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM'" 4FISHERIES PROGRAM'" ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM * *Send SEPA Checklist and full set of plans w/ NOA MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P: W DM INISTRATW E \FORMS \CHECKLIS T. DOC \UWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE* ( ) p.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY ( ) SOUND TRANSIT ( ) DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION* - * SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW ALIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PTS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: • Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to the NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. _ Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *My parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - .. — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:\ADMINISTRATIV E \FORMS \CHECKLIST.DOC • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2599 10230 East Marginal LLC 12201 Tukwila International Blvd, 4th Floor Tukwila, WA 98168. • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard • Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188-2599 David D. Kang . 12201 Tukwila International Blvd Fourth Floor Seattle, WA 98168-5121 CHASE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT L 10315 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILAWA98168 10230 EAST MARGINAL LLC 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD 4TH -FL TUKWILAWA98168 MICHIGAN PROPERTIES 5301 2ND AVE S SEATTLEWA98108 TENANT 3301 S NORFOLK ST SEATTLEWA98118 TENANT 10016 E MARGINAL WAY TUKWILAWA98108 TENANT 10325 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILAWA98168 BUTY LP 1150 ALKI AVE SW 4 SEATTLE WA98116 MASSA,BOB 372 S REYNOLDS RD OTHELLOWA99344 EAST MARGINAL ASSOCIATES 700 N 36TH ST - SEATTLEWA98103 TENANT 10230 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLEWA98168 TENANT 10320 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILAWA98168 TENANT . 10200 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILAWA98168 3301 SOUTH NORFOLK LLC 12201 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD TUKWILAWA98168 ROACH,JOHN S 3720 80TH AVE SE MERCER ISLANDWA98040 BOEING COMPANY PO BOX 3707 SEATTLEWA98124 TENANT 10035 E MARGINAL WAY TUKWILAWA98108 TENA 10315 E TUKWIL AL WAY S 98168 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number fog- ool LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works 1:21. Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project: Seeke -y Dipeo A h?, ÷ Vo Gvn y C6 vp Address: /02 3 o E/ ,s,/ /Vt7'1/,�/ w�� Date transmitted: Z /7 / Zary 7 Response requested by: /ZI / Zz-U g Staff coordinator: �iyil j f Ra4V(S Date response received: COMMENTS N c4 &a/5 .4-vbrndiea �'Y�i C �► ' t�YP�vicv da ye (t, ri/r(e1"`f- 404440 p i) ( D67- q76, i)d7 -1177) 15 k Q_t -k 1 ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested Plan approved Plan check date: zi ejt1 ,n Comments prepared by: 03/14/44 a City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number Eo' -o I LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building ❑ .Planning jRf Public Works . ❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project: s/A e o/`h077 birn‘y c60,arkvp uui_= ill0L=L-) Address: y /02250 ga c-1 141 Ahn / (,�lw EU 0 / COUti Date 0 transmitted: 2/7 / Zdb S Response requested by: 2 �Z 1 /7- �� ®�� p Staff coordinator: /4,1m,'? geto S Date response received: COMMENTS 1\1&(4) f :4, 1 ry f S `777YPV ftt! S dinio m,k C1)o7 -�t7� hd7— 971) 5 Pq 9 -05) h ce moue .at,. 1 auArt, �1 nit.P:P t OE ezi4h+vtkciii 416 t-n i 51.1.43a fly pv94 4444 (�PSAPC!4 6.G+ turf-4,d- i4 ittraeu f g, I rig. t)49.0 01_ (2, 910.,„2 rf2,1A,A FeptLytA set de-adce,c7 ❑ DRC review requested Plan check date: 21 o e l D g ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Comments prepared by: 03/14/94 • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards DATE: February 8, 2008 PROJECT: Sabey Demo (NW Auto) + Voluntary Cleanup 10230 E Marginal Way S FILE No: E08 -001 (SEPA) PROJECT No: P07 -160 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. The following are PW comments for SEPA approval: SEPA check list item # A9 1) Since more than one acre will be disturbed as a result of this project, applicant shall obtain a DOE construction permit. Please note that D07 -476 and D07 -477 shall not be issued until applicant submits proof that application for DOE permit has been filed. 2) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) permit for demolition shall be obtained. Applicant shall call PSAPCA at (206) 689 -4058. 3) A separate hauling permit (fee $100.00) from Public Works is required for hauling contaminated dirt. Refer to PW Bulletin A -4 for permit submittal. 4) Applicant shall check with Tukwila Fire Department if a separate permit for UG storage tank removal is required. (P:Laurie Admin /Joanna/Comments 1 E08 -001) PUBLIC WORKS BULLETIN A4 RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA Public Works Department 206 - 433 -0179 On Oct. 16, 2002, the City implemented a new Public Works permit system and a new right -of- way use ordinance, Title 11. This Bulletin summarizes Public Works' application requirements for permitting activities in the right -of -way. Refer to Title 11 for more complete information. The Permit application must be submitted at least 30 days before the activity begins. In some cases Public Works will expedite the permit process, but additional fees may be charged to cover additional costs. (TMC 11.08.030) P mit application contents (Application TMC 11.08.030): Completed Permit Application ❑ Plan showing all proposed work: • Property lines, pavement edges, excavation dimensions • Facilities being installed, maintained, repaired • Other such details ❑ Copy of the contractor estimate or engineer estimate for the activity being permitted. Public Works will review and may adjust. Any adjustment will be made when the permit is issued. ❑ Copy of franchise agreement, easement, encroachment permit, license or other legal authorization L�( City of Tukwila business license (TMC 11.08.030) . Liability insurance (TMC 11.08.100) i 't.t ...p"IL<dL, ❑ Automobile insurance (TMC 11.08.100) �J oyerfortnance Fianacial Guarantee (150 %) (TMC 11.08.110) Maintenance Financial Guarantee (TMC 11.08.110) (Public utilities exempted) Hold Harmless Agreement (TMC 11.08.120) ❑ Traffic control plan a Application fee 100 at,d2, rotA)-6 ltALL (9'1A4' etAAlt Approved November, 2002 1 Revised 12.31.2005 21/ bowd PUBLIC WORKS BULLETIN A4 RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT APPLICATION Insurance 11.08.100 • Comprehensive general liability insurance with limits not less than $2,000,000. • Business automobile liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000. • Contractor's pollution liability insurance, on an occurrence form, with limits not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence and deductible not more than $25,000. • If the Public Works Director determines the nature of any work is such that it may create a hazard to human life, endanger adjoining property, street, street improvement, or any other public property, the Director may require the applicant to file a certificate of insurance. The Director, based on the nature of the risks involved, shall determine the amount of insurance. Bonds 11.08.110 (Public utilities exempted) • . A corporate surety bond, cash deposit or letter of credit for 150% of the value of the right -of- way work to be done, in order to guarantee faithful performance of the permitted work. • Maintenance Bond to guarantee workmanship and materials for two years following completion of work. • The Director may a require bond for 10% of the project costs for erosion prevention and sediment control on projects which clear more than 6000 square feet or contain or abut sensitive areas such as Class 2 or steeper slopes, wetlands, or critical drainage. This Bulletin should not be used as a substitute for codes and regulations. Your project will be reviewed for specific compliance to codes and regulations. Approved November, 2002 2 Revised 12.31.2005 does your construction site need a stormwater permit site operator's guide to epa's stormwater permit program 1 need permit coverage. Where do 1 start? 1. Read EPA's Construction General Permit (CGP) You can download a copy of EPAs permit at www.epa.yov /npdes /stormwater /cgp. Read EPA's permit carefully, and remember that operators are legally responsible for complying with all its provisions. Who submits an NOI? The "operator" submits o Notice of Intent (NOI) form. The operator is the entity (generally company, corporation, etc.) that has operational control over the construction plans or day -la -day activities that are necessary to implement the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (see below). On some sites, several entities may meet the definition of operator and all must file NOIs. Operators may include owners. general contractors, and subcontractors. II is the responsibility of the operator(s) to develop and implement a SWPPP and mointoin all best management practices (BMPs) during each stage of the project. Best management proctices ore the techniques (buffers, silt fences, detention ponds, swales, etc.), schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, and maintenonce procedures to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants. 2. Develop a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) The 5\VPPP is a plan for how you will control stormwater runoff from your construction site. It is broader and mo e complicated than a typical erosion and sediment control plan, so operators might wont to enlist the ossistunce of a professional to soue time. The SWPPP must be completed before you file an NOI to apply for coverage under EPA's permit. You don't have to submit the SWPPP with your NOI to obtain permit coverage, but the plan must be available on -site for review during inspection. Because every site is unique, every SWPPP is unique. The SWPPP needs to be updated as your work progresses. Please visit www,cpa.gov /npdes /stormwater /cgp for more Information on how to develop your SWPPP (] Basic SWPPP Principles • Divert stormwater away from disturbed or exposed areas of the construction site. • Install BMPs to control erosion and sediment and manage stormwater. • Inspect the site regularly and properly maintain BMPs, especially after rainstorms. • Revise. the SWPPP as site conditions change during construction and improve the SWPPP if BMPs ore not effectively controlling erosion and sediment. • Minimize e*posure of bare soils to precipitation to the extent practicable. • Keep the construction site cleon by putting trash in trash cons,:keepina storage bins covered, and sweeping up e •cess sediment on roads and other imperviouSK udoces.' 3. Complete an endangered species determination for the project site The operator must assess the potential effects of stormwater runoff on federally fisted endangered and threat- ened species and any designated critical habitat on or near the site. In making this determination, the operator needs to consider oleos beyond the immediate footprint of the construction activity and beyond the property line— areas that could be affected directly or indirectly by stormwater discharges. The local offices of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Notional Marine Fisheries Service, and State or Tribal Heri- tage Centers often maintain lists of federally listed endangered or threatened species on their Web sites. Visit www.epo.gov /npdes /stormwater /eso for more information. How to get a stormwater permit All construction sites disturbing 1 or more acres (with few exceptions) need stormwater permit coverage! • Does your construction project disturb 1 or more acres of land through clearing, grading, excavating, or stockpiling of fill material? Remember to count the acreage of the entire project, even if you are responsible for only a small portion. • Is there any possibility that stormwater could run off of your site? (In alrnest every case, the answer to this question is yes. However, if the topography of your site is such that there is no possibility that rainfall or snow melt could leave the site or enter a waterway under any condition, you would not need permit coverage.) If you answered "yes" to both of these questions, YOU NEED PERMIT COVERAGE! If you don't have permit coverage, you could be fined up to $32,500 per day! 4. File a Notice of Intent (NOI) The Notice of Intent (NOI) form lets EPA know that you are filing for permit coverage. It is also your certification that you have read, understood, and implemented the requirements of EPA's permit. The fastest and easiest way to obtain permit coverage is through EPA's new online permit application system (www.epa.gov /npdes/ enoi). EPA's permit requires a 7 -day waiting period after an NOI is filed and posted on EPA's Web site (www.epa.gov /npdes /noisearch). Using EPA's eNOI system is the fastest way to begin this process. Mailing a paper NOI to EPA can add 2 or more weeks to your processing time. During the waiting period, NOIs are reviewed for endangered species impacts and other concerns. Permit coverage begins at the conclusion of the 7 -day period unless you are notified otherwise. Your completed NOI should be posted at the construction site in a place accessible to the public. 5. Implement all BMPs outlined in your SWPPP Remember to follow your SWPPP. All BMPs must be inspected and maintained regularly. Inspections are required either (1) at least once every 7 days or (2) at least once every 14 days and within 24 hours of the end of a rain event of 1 /2 -inch or more. The plan must also be updated cis site conditions and BMPs change. Remember to keep records of your maintenance activities and any SWPPP modifications for review during inspection. 6. File an electronic Notice of Termination You should terminate permit coverage when your project is completed (generally, when 70% of the density of the original vegetation is reestablished on unpaved areas), when the property has been stabilized and ownership has been transferred to the homeowner (residential projects only), or when another operator has assumed control over the site (new operators will need to file an NOI and meet the requirements of EPA's permit). The electronic Notice of Termination form informs EPA that your construction project is complete and ends your responsibilities under the permit. The form can be completed and filed using the eNOI system at www.epa.gov /npdes /enoi. Printed with vegetable -based ink on paper that contains a minimum of 50% post - consumer fiber content processed chlorine -free. EPA 833 -F -04 -002 February 2004 • CiV of Tukwila Department of Community Development • _File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: X Building ❑ Planning ❑ Public Works ❑ Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project: s4.19.e De,rna ft .A 16 t,n1r/ C (ianA,p Address: /D236 E4s/ f/l?-//»J weL S Date transmitted: J 2/-7 /Zcb / Response requested by: '2/2 i &IR) & Stab coordinator: j)GLGVi1l € 7 aah' Date response received: COMMENTS N a t ) ri e Gk /i s /s )hrr/.ffte, h rP f.�f cvrvti I (Jvl/lO p&rin `/3 . (bob - L-176 B O7 -1-177) ❑ DRC review requested Plan check date: 57_0 ❑ Plan submittal requested Comments prepared by: ❑ Plan approved 03/14/94 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number oo I LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: r Building X Planning Public Works 40ire Dept. Police Dept. !' Parks /Rec Project: 6 exbe d (to an v ck .D noli -iz ., -R 9. -1' Address: 1o2. 30 E filitr ;r/A1 u ay .s Date transmitted:.. 2, / - /z 0z7 Response requested by: Z /% J2.erbg' Staff coordinator: Je .i n/e 1zoytS Date response received: REVIEWERS: Please specify how the attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED development regulations, including citations. Be specific in describing the types of changes you want made to the plans. When referencing codes, please identify the actual requirement and plan change needed. The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the . mitigation required (e.g., water capacity, road level of service analyses, or tuming analyses) may be required of the •applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) - 'Ledge revter v ama, pv w/ t'4'I/l7/4/14. Plan check date: Comments prepared d by: Update date: • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: uilding !Planning V Public Works Fire Dept. ' r— ! Police Dept. LJ Parks /Rec Project: SAbev CLean or ck .D m1, ., -r- eJt Address: 1 ©2 3 0 E tau- /�17 #-I fit-�u y .S Date cl transmitted: - Z/ `f /Z e'v Response requested by: 2- // ? / Z07)K Staff coordinator: 3;t /rn/e ge.a.ViS Date response received:. REVIEWERS: Please specify how the development regulations, including citations. want made to the plans. When referencing plan change needed. attached plans conflict with your ADOPTED Be specific in describing the types of changes you codes, please identify the actual requirement and The Planning Division review does not supplant each department's ability to administer its own regulations and permits. However, project consistency at the Planning review stage is important to minimize significant later design changes. More than minimal design changes require further Planning Commission review, even if alteration is required to satisfy a City requirement. This further review is typically a minimum 60-day process. Requirements based on SEPA (e.g., not required by an adopted development regulation) MUST identify the impact being mitigated, the policy basis for requiring mitigation, and the method used to calculate the mitigation required. Calculations of project impacts and the mitigation required (e.g., .water capacity, road level of service analyses, or tuming analyses) may be required of the •applicant. COMMENTS (Attach additional comment sheets and/or support materials as needed.) ?L&z rev i e,U and . te?n hie4113. Gr 4.0-‘ o41#->e er�� 614 624f/P24,47 IPlan check date:2 Comments prepared by: Update date: ... • Cityof Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor . Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION January 29, 2008 Mr. David D. Kang 12201 Tukwila International Blvd Fourth Floor Seattle, WA 98168 -5121 Subject: 10230 East Marginal Way S SEPA Environmental Review Application E08 -001 Dear Mr. Kang: Your application for SEPA Environmental Review for voluntary cleanup and demolition of soil and structures located at 10230 East Marginal Way. S is considered complete on January 29, 2008 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require . that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such-information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application . applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits .issued by other agencies. The City of Tukwila will coordinate with Fast Signs to have the public notice board for this project manufactured and installed on site within 14 days. The City of Tukwila will also coordinate the public notice mailing with installation of the public notice board. Once the public notice board is installed, the public comment period for this project will be 14 days. Please contact me with any questions at (206) 431 -3659. JR Page 1 of 2 C: \Documents and Settings\Jaimie- R\Desktop\E08- 001_Completeness letter.DOC 01/28/2008 2:57 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington. 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Sincerely; Jaimie Reavis Assistant Planner cc. E08 -001 dd. D07 -476 ee. D07 -477 JR Page 2 of 2 C: \Documents and SettingsU aimie- R\Desktop\E08- 001_Completeness Ietter.DOC 01/28/2008 2:57 PM Dalton, O1ms'Ced & Fuglevand; Inc. Environmental Consultants 6034 N Star Rd. • Ferndale, Washington 98248 Telephone (360) 380-0862 (FAX 360- 380 -0862) Cell (206) 498 -6616 e -mail: mdalton(a,dofnw.com (Kirkland, WA Office — 425- 827 -4588) MEMORANDUM REC Iv_, s JUL 17 2007 Sabey Corp. TO: : Dale Myers — Dept. of Ecology FROM: Matt Dalton DATE: July 16, 2007 D� a 212001 COELOPf�EN7 SUBJECT: VCP Application oEv NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA REF. NO: SAB- 029 -01 CC: Jim Harmon — Sabey Corporation Dean Sabey — Sabey Corporation Marcelo Garces — Sabey Corporation Dave Cooper - DOF Enclosed with this memorandum is a VCP application for the referenced site. Also enclosed are the following documents: • VCP Agreement • Remediation Plan — NW Auto Wrecking Site (July 2007) • Subsurface Investigation Report and Remedial Approach for Cleanup — Northwest Auto Wrecking Property (March 21, 2007) We are in the process of selecting a remediation contractor and hope to start the remedial work in August. Once the work is completed, we will submit to Ecology a remedial construction report that documents the work. Our intent is to obtain a No Further Action designation for the Northwest Auto Wrecking site. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks Matt Dalton Voluntary Cleanup Program Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics oxics Cleanup Program • RECEIVED TEC 21 2001 . j • • ; 4411 4: t : =I ! ' 7 F \ • E 1. I o t Under the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), the Department of Ecology (Ecology) may provide informal site - specific technical consultations to persons conducting independent remedial actions at a hazardous waste site. Ecology may provide such consultations under the authority of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. To request technical consultations under the VCP, you must submit an application to Ecology. That application must include, at a minimum, the following documents: • VCP Application Form (including required attachments); E THIS DOCUMENT • VCP Agreement. For guidance on how to complete your VCP application, including this Application Form, please refer to the Application Instructions, which are available separately. All of these documents are available for downloading on the VCP web site: http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov /programs /tcp /vcp /vcpmain.htm. Client 'Information. The "Client" is the person or entity seeking informal site-specific technical consultations from Ecology under the VCP. This person must sign the VCP Agreement and is responsible for payment of those costs incurred by Ecology in providing the requested consultative services: Please enter the required information below. Name: Matthew Dalton Title: Hydrogeologist Organization: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Mailing address: 6034 N. Star Rd. City: Ferndale State: WA Zip: 98248 Phone: 360 - 380 -0862 Fax: 360- 380 -0862 E -mail: mdalton @dofnw.com What is the Client's involvement at the Site? Please check all that apply. ❑ Property owner ❑ Past property owner ❑ Future property owner ❑ Property lessee ❑ Other — please specify: Business owner (operator) Mortgage holder Consultant Attorney If not the current property owner, is the Client acting as the agent for the property owner? ® Yes ❑ No If not the current property owner, is the Client authorized to grant access to the property? ❑ Yes ® No 1 Property Owner Information (if different than Client). If the Client is not the current property owner, please enter the required information below. Name: Marcelo Garces 'Title: Project Manager Organization: 10230 East Marginal LLC, c/o Sabey Corporation, Manager Mailing address: 12201 Tukwila International Blvd. City: Seattle State: WA Zip: 98168 -5121 Phone: 206 277 -5253 Fax: 206 282 -9951 E -mail: marcelog @sabey.com What type of entity /1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ is the property owner? Please check only one. Private ❑ County Tribal ❑ Municipal Federal ❑ Mixed State ❑ Public School Other — please specify: Billing Contact Information (if different than Client). If the Client would like Ecology to mail billing statements to an address different than the Client's above, please enter the required information. below. Please note that the Client will remain responsible for payment under the VCP Agreement. Name: Title: Organization: Mailing address: • City: State: Zip: Phone: Fax: E -mail: What type of entity is the property owner? Please check only one. ❑ Private ❑ County ❑ Tribal ❑ Municipal ❑ Federal ❑ Mixed ❑ State ❑ Public School ❑ Other — please specify: Services Requested by Client. What type of independent remedial action plan or report are you submitting to Ecology with your application for review under the VCP? Please check all that apply. ❑ Interim action plan ❑ Remedial investigation plan ❑ Interim action report ❑ Remedial investigation report /1 Cleanup action plan ❑ Feasibility study report ❑ Cleanup action plan ❑ Other — please specify: Do you want Ecology to provide you with a written opinion on the planned or completed independent remedial action? Yes ❑ No Please note that Ecology's opinion will be limited to: • Whether the planned or completed remedial actions at the site meet the substantive requirements of MTCA, and /or • Whether further remedial action is necessary at the site under MTCA to characterize and address all of the contamination at the site. 2 Instructions for Data Submittal. In accordance with WAC 173 - 340 - 840(5), when submitting any sampling data to Ecology, please submit the data in both a printed form and an electronic form capable of being transferred into Ecology's data management systems. The data must be submitted consistent with the procedures specified in Ecology's Toxic Cleanup Program Policy 840 (Data Submittal Requirements). Please note that any report submitted to Ecology for review under the VCP that does not comply with these data submittal requirements will be considered incomplete by Ecology. , � 3 Part 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE ..._ ..... _._ . ,...__._..,._.., ,1. _ . _. _ Wi _ _ Name of the Site. Please enter the name of the Site below. Name: Northwest Auto Wrecking Alternate Name Location: of the Site Reference Point. Do you know which property is the source of the release(s) of hazardous substances at the Site (i.e., source property)? . If you answered ."YES," then please refer to the "source property" when 4 Yes answering the following questions regarding the location of the Site, even if your independent remedial action does not address that property. If you answered "NO," then please refer to the "affected property" addressed ❑ No by your independent remedial action when answering the following questions regarding the location of the Site. An affected property is a property affected by the release(s) on the source property. Physical;Address. Please enterthe physical address of the property below. Name: Northwest Auto Wrecking Property, 10230 East Marginal Way South City: Tukwila State: WA Zip: 98168 Geographic Pos,rt* . . Latitude (tat) and Longitude (Long): For additional guidance on how to coimplete ,this - part�of'the application form, please refer�to the application instruction-,0. .. COORDINATES LATITUDE: Degrees: Minutes: Seconds: LONGITUDE.,: Degrees: Minutes: Seconds: LOCATION ON l?RoPERTY:'. [0*; point of release-or center-Of -parcel] Center of parcel . COLLECTION METHOD, ` . [e.g., GPS:oi:'address :matching] USGS Quad Map on TOPO COLLECTION SOURCE :: ..;[i:e:, map'scale] 1" =2 500' HORIZONTAL DATUM: [i.e., base reference fa coordinate system] NAD83 ACCURACY LEVEL: [i.e., +/- feet or meters] NAVD88 Legal Descriptions. TRS DATA Township: T23N Range: R4E Section: 4 Quarter-Quarter SE of NE TAX PARCEL #(S): 0423049102, 0423049015, 0323049062 3 Extent of the Site. What is the approximate areal extent of the Site? Please check only one. ❑ < 5,000 square feet ❑ > 5,000 square feet, but < 1 acre /1 > 1 acre, but < 10 acres ❑ > 10 acres ❑ Unknown Properties Affected by the Site. Do any (affected If you the release(s) additional of the releases on the source property affect any properties adjacent to the source property properties)? ❑ Yes 11 No ❑ Unknown answered "YES" above, then please identify each property that you know has been affected by on the source property. If you need to identify additional properties, please attach pages. 1 Address: Tax Parcel(s): 2 Address: Tax Parcel(s): 3 Address: Tax Parcel(s): 4 Address: Tax Parcel(s): Do any property? If you of the releases affect any right -of -ways (e.g., streets) located on or adjacent to the source ❑ Yes ❑ No I I Unknown answered "YES" above, please specify: Is the If you source property affected by any release(s) on properties adjacent to the source property? ❑ Yes ❑ No I 1 Unknown answered "YES" above, please specify: Description of Release(s) at the Site orce of Re /ease(s) What are the source(s) of the release(s) at the Site? Please check all that apply. Point source (e.g., leaking tank) ❑ Non -point source (e.g., contaminated soil used as fill) ❑ Area -wide lead and arsenic soil contamination (see Question #4 below) /1 Other — please specify: Auto Wrecking Yard ❑ Unknown To petroleum describe the source(s) of the release(s):battery chips and drippage of the extent known, please hydrocarbons /cleaning of parts 4 Circumstances of Release(s). To the extent known, please describe below the circumstances of the release(s). Operation of auto wrecking yard - 1958 to 2007 Circumstances of Release Discovery. To the extent known, please describe below the circumstances of the discovery of the release(s). Unknown Area -Wide Soil Contamination. For guidance on how to complete this part of the application form, please refer to the application instructions and the area -wide soil contamination tool box located at the following Ecology web site http: / /www.ecy.wa.gov /programs /tcp /area wide /area wide hp.html. Is the Site located within an area affected by area, or on a former apple or pear orchard in smelter emissions, such as the Tacoma Smelter Plume operation prior to 1947? /or lead soil contamination? ❑ Yes I 1 No ❑ Unknown Does the Site contain area -wide arsenic and ❑ Yes -1 No ❑ Unknown Nature and Extent of Hazardous Substances Released at the Site Hazar'alous Substances and Affected Media. To the extent known, please identify in the following table the_hazardous substances released at the Site and the media (e.g., soil) impacted by those su bbstances using the codes at the bottom of the table. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ti> AFFECTED; MEDIA SOIL GROUND WATER' SURFACE wATER SEDIMENT AIR EXAMPLE Benzene C.. N/A N/A B Lead C C N/A N/A U Arsenic C B N/A N/A U Cadmium C B N/A N/A U Diesel Range Hydrocarbons C C N/A N/A U Heavy -Oil Range Hydrocarbons C S N/A N/A U Benzene S C N/A N/A U Gasoline Range Hydrocarbons S C N/A . N/A U PCBs B B N/A N/A U Toluene S • C N/A N/A U Ethylbenzene and Xylene S C . N/A N/A U When identifying the affected media in the table above, please use one of the following codes: • C = confirmed, above cleanup level • B = confirmed, below cleanup level • 0 = confirmed, not present • S = suspected • N/A = not suspected • U = unknown 5 Drinking Water. Does any of the contamination at the Site pose a threat or potential threat to an existing drinking water source (ground water or surface water)? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, what type of drinking water system is threatened by the contamination? Please check all that apply. ❑ Single Family ❑ Community Indoor Air. Are contaminate odors present in any buildings, manholes, or other confined spaces? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify: Maps of the Site. Please attach to this application map(s) that identify, to the extent known, the following: • The location of the site • The properties affected by the site • The source(s) of the release(s) at the site • The nature and extent of contamination at the site • Any human or ecological receptors impacted by the site (e.g., drinking water wells) • The physical characteristics of the site (e.g., property lines, building and road outlines, surface water bodies, water supply wells, ground water flow direction, and utility right -of -ways) • The properties adjacent to the site and the uses of those properties (e.g., gas station, dry cleaner, residential). -- Part 3 — OPERATIONAL HISTORY OF THE SITE Current Use of Source Property. Note that the following questions refer only to the Source Property, not other properties affected by the Site. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. • current'owner(s) of the Current;P, rope source prope Owners. To the extent' :known; p easel en ify a ow. • °-1 Name: Jim Harmon Title: Senior VP Organization: 10230 East Marginal LLC, c/o Sabey Corporation, Manager Mailing address: 12201 Tukwila International Blvd. City: Seattle State: WA Zip code: 98168 -5121 Phone: 206 669 -0441 Current Business Owner (Operator). To the extent known, please identify below the current owner of the business located on the source property. Name: Title: • Organization: Mailing address: City: State: ,Zip code: Phone: 6 • • Current Business Operations. To the extent known, please identify below the current operations of the business located on the source property. What is the current land use of the source property? Please check all that apply. ❑ Residential ❑ School ❑ Commercial ❑ Childcare facility ❑ Industrial ❑ Park ❑ Agricultural ® Other — please specify: Inactive pending cleanup Is there a currently operational commercial or industrial business located on the source property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify in the following table the current business operations using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes and specifying the operations. NAICS CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores EX: 447110 , Unknown Auto Wrecking Yard Is there a solid waste handling facility located on the Source Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify: Is there a dangerous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility located on the Source Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please identify: Re ulation. of Current Busin "ess Operations. Does the business operate under any federal, state, or local permits related to the release of hazardous substances into the environment (e.g., NPDES permit)? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If you answered "YES" above, please specify the regulated operation, the name of the permit, and the date it was issued in the table below. :REGULATED OPERATION :PERMIT EX Wastewater discharge ;NPDES permit DATE.ISSUED. 02/0VO27'� ax Has a state or federal notice of enforcement action (e.g., notice of violation) ever been issued related to the release of hazardous substances at the business? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown If you answered "yes" above, please specify (notice and year issued): 7 Have business operations resulted in any other spills or other unpermitted releases on the source property? Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown if you answered "YES" above, please specify in the table below. RELEASE DATE OF RELEASE STATUS OF RELEASE See enclosed reports Storage Tank Information. In table below, please identify all above ground storage tanks (AST) and underground storage tanks (UST) that have been used for storing hazardous substances on the source property, irrespective of whether the tanks are still in use or in place. If you are unable to provide answers: to specific questions: regarding a tank, please enter "U" for unknown: STATUS AND.CLOSURE • IDENTIFICATION Hazardous Substance :.:Diesel Gasoline Type (AST/UST) UST UST Size (Gallons) 10,000 U TANK ID DATE •INSTALL IN USE (YIN) : DATE. CLOSED.,. . 02187 05/98 CLOSURE INEr aon ( *). Removed RELEASES PAST. •,(YIN) CURRENT (YIN) U N 1976 Removed Y N Stove Oil UST U U N U U U U ( *) Options = Removed or Closed in Place Past Use of Source Property: Note that the following questions refer only to the Source Property, not other properties affected by the Site. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. Past Property Owners. To the extent 'known, please Identify below the.current owner s) of thesource Name: Gerald M. Haapla, Paul D. Jensen, Marilyn D. Jensen, and Donald F. Jensen Organization: Title: Owners Mailing address: 'State: 'Zip code: ' Fax: 1E-mail: -Past Business Owners (Operators). To the extent known, please identi fy. below the current owner(s)' ofth "esouree property.. Name: Gerry Haapla 'Title: Owner City: Phone: Organization: Northwest Auto Wrecking Mailing address: City: State: • 'Zip code: Phone: Fax: E -mail: 8 Identification of Past Business Operations. Please identify in the following table the past operations of businesses located on the source property using the North American Industry Classification System ( NAICS) codes and /or specifying the operations. NAICS CODE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS EX: 447110 Gasoline Stations with Convenience Stores Unknown Auto Wrecking Yard Future Use of Source and Affected Properties. The following questions refer to both source and affected properties. Please answer these questions to the best of your ability. Will any ownership interest in the of, the cleanup? source or affected properties be conveyed prior to, or upon completion ❑ Unknown specify: ❑ Yes '1 No If you answered "YES" above, please Will any of the source or affected the cleanup? properties, or portions of those properties, be redeveloped as part of ❑ Unknown specify the proposed land use below. Please check all that apply. School Childcare facility Park 1 Yes ❑ No If you answered "YES" above, please ❑ Residential ❑ ►i1 Commercial ❑ ►1 Industrial ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ Other — please specify: Please also specify the activities proposed for that land use: Part 4 - ADMINISTRATIVE HISTORY OF THE SITE r' Have you previously reported the release(s) of hazardous substances at the Site to Ecology? 2007 ❑ No ❑ Unknown ►.1 Yes — If so, when? Has the cleanup of the Site, or any ❑ Yes — If so, please portion of the Site, ever been managed under the VCP? specify the VCP Project ID #: // No ❑ Unknown Has the cleanup of the Site, or order or decree? ❑ Yes — If so, please any portion of the Site, ever been managed under a federal or state specify the type and docket #: No ❑ Unknown 9 Part 5 .;` DESCRIPTION OF INDEPENDENT 7 - ..F. -£s REMEDIALACTIONS s- ,: :.. AT TH E SITE Vi'-: Scope of Remedial Actions. Do contamination If you contamination NOT pages you plan to characterize located on affected and address all of the contamination at the Site, including any adjacent properties, as part of the VCP project? ❑ Unknown please describe below the scope of the VCP project, including the of a property, media and /or hazardous substances) that you DO /or addressing as part of the VCP project. Please include additional L Yes ❑ No answered "NO" above, (properties, portions plan on characterizing and if necessary. Status of Remedial Actions. What is the current status of remedial actions at the site? Please check all that apply in the table below. REMEDIAL" ACTION' PLANNED ONGOING COMPLETED NOT APPLICABLE INITIAL RESPONSE (UST ONLY) X INTERIM. ACTION X REMEDIAL - INVESTIGATION X FEASIBILITY STUDY X CLEANIJPACTION X Documentation of Remedial Actions. Please list in the table below all known remedial action plans or reports produced for the site, including: • The title of the plan or report, • The author (e.g. consulting firm) of the plan or report, • The date the plan or report was produced, • Whether the plan or report has been submitted to Ecology, • The date the plan or report was submitted to Ecology. TITLE; AUTHOR .... DATE SUBMITTED TO ECOLOGY :. - , : ;. `. ... Y /0 :' DATE: EX. °f .'•b}. John Doe's Property: Remedial,lnvestiga6on Work Plan Mom's Consulting Firm 02120/99. .try NO N/A �' Subsurface Investigation Report and Remedial Approach for Cleanup Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. 03/21/07 Y 3/07 2. Remediation Plan, Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand Inc. 7/07 N 7/07 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 10 Part fi° :STATEMENT AND {SIGNAT Statement and Signature. The undersigned affirms that the information contained in this application is true and accurate to the best of his or her knowledge. Please note that someone other than the Client may sign this Application Form. Name: Mattew Dalton (Title: Sr. Consulting Hydrogeologist Organization: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Mailing address: 6034 N. Star Rd. City: Ferndale Phone: 360 - 380 -0862 'State: WA Zip code: 98248 Fax: 360- 380 -0862 I E- mail: mdalton @dofnw.com Affiliation. What is the signatory's involvement at the Site? Please check all that apply. ❑ Client ❑ Property Owner ® Consultant ❑ Attorney El Other — please specify: 11 SUBIFAITTAL I.NSTRUCTIOI To complete your application, please submit the following materials to the Ecology regional office for the County in which your Site is located: 1 - ® VCP Application Form (signed) 2 - ® VCP Agreement (signed by Client) 3 - ® Independent Remedial Action Plan(s) or Report(s) (see Part I.D of VCP Application Form) 4 - ® Map(s) of the Site (see Part II.G of VCP Application Form) 5 - ❑ Terrestrial Ecological Evaluation Exclusion Form (if applicable) To identify the appropriate Ecology regional office, please refer to the following map: Northwest Region: Central Region: Attn: Dale Myers Attn: Mark Dunbar 3190160' Ave. SE 15 W. Yakima Ave., Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 Yakima, WA 98902 Southwest Region: Eastern Region: Attn: Bob Warren Attn: Patti Carter P.O. Box 47775 N. 4601 Monroe Olympia, WA 98504 -7775 Spokane, WA 99205 -1295 If you have any questions regarding the application process or how to complete the forms, please contact the appropriate regional office contact listed below: Northwest Region: Central Region: Mark Edens, Unit Supervisor Valerie Drew, Unit Supervisor (425) 649 -7070 (509) 454-7886 mede461@ecy.wa.gov vdre461@ecy.wa.gov Southwest Region: Eastern Region: Bob Warren, Unit Supervisor Sherman Spencer, Unit Supervisor (360) 407 -6361 (509) 329 -3408 rwar461@ecy.wa.gov sspe461@ecy.wa.gov if you need this publication in an alternate format, please call the Toxics Cleanup Program at 360 - 407 -7170. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can can 877 - 833 -6341. ECY#020 -74 (revised 6/06) 12 z. 0 0 47 °33.000' N 47 °31'.000' N :47 °..24M00'.N .47 °27.000' N z 0 0 N lY TOPOI map printed on 02/27/07 from "WasbIngton.tpo" and "Untided.tpg" 122 °24.000' W 122°22.000' W 122 °20.000' W 122 °18.000' W 122 °16.000' W 122 °14.000' W __ . _sas.�ce,!,_.ar_ .etc:........, . h taro. •.0 ._. :.0 bns%? - 'V ?'• WGS84 122 °10.000' W Tit tgearitl An ; 1' Z 0 0 0 m m 47 °31.000' N 122624:000' W 122 °22.000' W 1 Ref: Vicin'rfy Map NWAW.cdr 1220.O00 'x+/ 122 °18.000'W - lT2 16(000: W 122 °14.000' W 0:" 03 1.0. -.13 .1.0 S..,5, .. 33a.0 " .. Punt:3 from TOPO? e1000.v1 /.4000;000 Red as (avv.bp°sal WGS84 122 °10.000' W Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Vicinity Map SAB- 029 -00 FIGURE 1 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. p cn Q QI� lQ Associated S. Norfolk St. Grocers Property Boundary Northwest Auto. Wrecking Seattle 111 Tukwi a Boeing Rd. Ref: Tax Lot NWAW.cdr 0 Scale in Feet 325 (approximate) Northwest Auto Wrecking SeattlefTukwila, Washington Tax Lot Parcel Numbers SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 2 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fualevand, Inc. North Soil Stockpile LCS Soil Stockpile Battery Chip Fill Former Parts Cleaning and Dismantling Shop Former Gasoline UST IsY" p.; �;r; {p� Approximate Locations of Historic STove Oil USTs Ref: Site Features 2 .cdr Other Features: Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTNACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) Unpaved ( "DIRT ") Asphalt paving I= Concrete paving Structures to remain Structures to be demolished 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Northwest Auto Wrecking SeattlelTukwila, Washington Pre- Remediation Site Features SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 3 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile LCS Stockpile E-24 C-36 WF-24 1522■iE=1 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: Spl. Locations.cdr Sample Locations: Sound Env. Strategies Corp, (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) WF-24 ri North Stockpile Spl. (2005) B03 -E3- Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP-02 Geoprobe/ Mont. Well (2005;2006) TP08 II Test Pit Sample (2007) G-MW-1 S Monitoring Well (1996) Geoprobe/Monitoring P08/MWO4 1/49_aw Well (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Sample Locations SAB-029-01 FIGURE 4 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, North Stockpile 3.5 to 38 LCS Stockpile 7.0 to 209 E-24 C-36 WF-24 15:52■1 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: As Surface Soils 2.cdr Arsenic Conc. : Sound Env. Strcfegles Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) Green - less than 20'mg/kg As MI Red - greater than 20 mg/kg As 68 (0.5') As Conc. (mg/kg) (Spl. Depth) WF-24 r North Stockpile Spl. (2005) B03 Al- Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) . GP-02 4_ Geoprobe (2006) TP08 Test Pit Sample (2007) G-MW-1 Monitoring Well (1996) P08/MWO4 Well (2007) s Geoprobe/Monitoring Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Arsenic in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB-029-01 FIGURE 5 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. ..=11■1•1011•11••••■•■ LCS Stockpile North Stockpile <1 to 5.9 <1 to 1.4 TP13 <1 (0.5) I5S5■!=1 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: Cd Surface Soils 2.cdr 'TP7S. Cadmium Conc. : Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTNACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) ME Green - less than 2 mg/kg Cd OM Red - greater than 2 mg/kg Cd 1.4 (0.5') Cd Conc. (mg/kg) (Spl. Depth) WF-24 1/1 North Stockpile Spl. (2005) B03 -E13- Surface Soli Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP-02 Geoprobe (2006) TP08 11! Test Pit Sample (2007) G-MW-1 Monitoring Well (1996) Geoprobe/MonitorIng P08/MWO4 Q.!" Well (2007) Northwest Auto • Wrecking SeattlefTukwila, Washington Cadmium in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB-029-01 FIGURE 6 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. • • Facility /Site Name: NW Auto Wrecking. • Facility /Site No.: cor��'ii�niu�', i7 • VCP Project No: For Office A@jl,ve �se Only • RECEIVED DEC 21 1uu i ay, Ffi)1Pi;F This document constitutes an Agreement between the State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) and Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. (Client) to . provide informal site - specific technical consultations under the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) for the Site identified above and associated with the following address: 10230 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington The purpose of this Agreement is to facilitate independent remedial action at the Site. Ecology is entering into this Agreement under the authority of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105D RCW, and its implementing regulations, Chapter 173 -340 WAC. If a term in this Agreement is defined in MTCA or Chapter 173 -340 WAC, then that definition shall govern. Services Provided by Ecology Upon request, Ecology agrees to provide the Client informal site - specific technical consultations on the independent remedial actions proposed for or performed at the Site consistent with WAC 173 -340- 515(5). Those consultations may include assistance in identifying applicable regulatory requirements and opinions on whether the remedial actions proposed for or conducted at the Site meet those requirements. Ecology may use any appropriate resource to provide the Client with the requested consultative services. Those resources may include, but shall not be limited to, those of Ecology and the Office of the Attorney General. However, Ecology shall not use independent contractors unless the Client provides Ecology with prior written authorization. In accordance with RCW 70.105D.030(1)(i), any opinions provided by Ecology under this Agreement are advisory only and not binding on Ecology. Ecology, the state, and officers and employees of the state are immune from all liability. Furthermore, no cause of action of any nature may arise from any act or omission in providing, or failing to provide, informal advice and assistance under the VCP. Payment for Services by Client The Client agrees to pay all costs incurred by Ecology in providing the informal site - specific technical consultations requested by the Client consistent with WAC 173 - 340 - 515(6) and 173 - 340 - 515(6). Those costs may include the costs incurred by attorneys or independent contractors used by Ecology to provide the requested consultative services. Ecology's hourly costs shall be determined based on the method in WAC 173 - 340 - 550(2). Ecology shall mail the Client a monthly itemized statement of costs (invoice) by the tenth day of each month (invoice date) that there is a balance on the account. The invoice shall include a summary of the costs incurred, payments received, identity of staff involved, and amount of time staff spent on the project. The Client shall pay the required amount by the due date, which shall be thirty (30) calendar days after the invoice date....lf payment has not been received by the due date, then Ecology shall withhold -any requested opinions and notify the.Client by certified mail that the debt is past due-2 If. payment' has not been received within sixty (60) calendar days of the invoice date, then Ecology shall stop all work under the Agreement and may, as appropriate, assign the debt to a collection agency under Chapter 19.16 RCW. The Client agrees to pay the collection agency fee incurred by Ecology in the course of debt collection. - • • Reservation of Rights / No Settlement This Agreement does not constitute a settlement of liability to the state under MTCA. This Agreement also does not protect a liable person from contribution claims by third parties for matters addressed by the Agreement. The state does not have the authority to settle with any person potentially liable under MTCA except in accordance with. RCW 70.105D.040(4). Ecology's signature on this Agreement in no way constitutes a covenant not to sue or a compromise of any Ecology rights or authority. Ecology reserves all rights under MTCA, including the right to require additional or different remedial actions at the Site should it deem such actions necessary to protect human health and the environment, and to issue orders requiring such remedial actions. Ecology also reserves all rights regarding the injury to, destruction of, or Toss of natural resources resulting from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Site. Effective Date, Modifications, and Severability The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which this Agreement is signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of Ecology and the Client. Amendments shall be in writing and shall be effective when signed by the Toxics Cleanup Program's Section Manager or delegated representative. If any provision of this Agreement proves to be void, it shall in no way invalidate any other provision of this Agreement. Termination of Agreement Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause by sending written notice to the other party by certified mail, return receipt requested. The effective date of termination shall be the date Ecology sends notice to the Client or the date Ecology receives notice from the Client, whichever occurs first. Under this Agreement, the Client is only responsible for costs incurred by Ecology before the effective date of termination. However, termination of this Agreement shall not affect any right Ecology may have to recover its costs under MTCA or any other provision of law. Representations and Signatures The undersigned representative of the Client hereby certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into this Agreement and to execute and legally bind the Client to comply with the Agreement. STATE OF WASHINGTON p41- �/,-t, vGr� 5 7-EJ2 e DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Signature Printed Name Section Manager, Toxics Cleanup Program Section Date: Name of Client Signature of Client or Client Representative /1,4774 2 G - 21 L7z'n� Printed Name of Signatory Title of Signatory Date: Instructions: Please submit this Agreement to Ecology as part of the VCP application. Before submitting the Agreement, please provide the Client's name and the Site's address on the first page and complete the Client's portion of the signature block on the second page. If the application is accepted, Ecology will sign the Agreement and send the Client an acceptance letter that will include the completed Agreement as an enclosure. North Stockpile E -24 C -36 WF -24 LCS Stockpile ),,,) j- Yip)", f'.1441g::41•A z-� 0 100 Scale hi Feet (approximate) Ref: Pb Surface Soils 2.cdr Lead Conc.: Sound Env, Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) ME Green - less than 250 mg /kg Pb Orange - greater than 250 mg/kg Pb ® Red - FaII TCLP Pink - > 250 mg /kg and May Fail TCLP 268(0.5') WF -24 B03 Pb Conc. (mg/kg) (Spl. Depth) ri North Stockpile SpI. (2005) Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP -02 TP08 G -MW-1 Q Monitoring Well (1996) P08 /MWO4 -4- Geoprobe (2006) Test Pit Sample (2007) Geoprobe /Monitoring ® Well (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Lead in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 7 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. RECE I O DEC 21 2007 comML; DEVELOPMENT REMEDIATION PLAN NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING SITE SEATTLE /TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Prepared for: 10230 East Marginal LLC, A Subsidiary of Sabey Corporation Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Environmental Consultants Draft: July 2007 • Remediation Plan Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Seattle/Tukwila, Washington CONTENTS Introduction 1 Site Description 1 Site Hydrogeology 3 Summary of Soil and Ground-Water Quality Data 3 Soil Quality Data and Soil Contaminants of Concern 3 Ground-Water Quality Data and Ground-Water Contaminants of Concern 5 Designation of Contaminated Soil 6 Pre-remedial Sampling 7 Surface Soil Sampling — Southeast Portion of NWAW Site 7 Surface Soil Sampling — Central Portion of NWAW Site 7 Detention Pond Area 7 Beneath Existing Site Paving 8 Approach to Site Remediation 8 General Approach 8 Health and Safety Plan 9 Utility and Existing Well Locating 9 Excavation and Stockpiling 9 Existing Stockpiles 10 Handling of Water 10 Handling Debris 10 Treatment of Characteristic DW 10 Disposal of Contaminated Materials 11 Backfilling 11 Reporting 11 References 12 • List of Tables Table 1 — Soil Quality Data Comparisons Table 2— Ground-Water Quality Data List of Figures Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2— Tax Lot Parcel Numbers Figure 3 — Pre-Remediation Site Features Figure 4— Sample Locations Figure 5 — Arsenic in Surface Soils Figure 6— Cadmium in Surface Soils Figure 7— Lead in Surface Soils Figure 8 — Pre-Remediation Soil Sampling (proposed) • • Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page ii July 2007 List of Attachments Attachment 1— Soil Quality Data — Tables Previous Reports Attachment 2 — Ground -Water Quality Data — Tables Previous Reports Remediation Plan Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Seattle/Tukwila, Washington INTRODUCTION This remedial plan presents the approach to cleanup metals and petroleum ed at droca bas contaminated soil at the Northwest Auto Wrecking (NWAW) site located i Marginal Way South, Tukwila, Washingt on (Figur es 1 and 2). Refinements to the plan may be made based on input from the selected remedial contractor(s). r(s). The reme amen al is based on data and analyses presented in a document prepared by Strategies Corporation titled "Subsurface Investigation Report and Remedial Approach for Cleanup ", March 21, 2007. Contaminant releases primarily occurred during the operation of an auto wrecking yard. Contaminants of concern (COCs) consist of metals (lead, arsenic and cadmium) derived from the crushing of car batteries that created battery chips and petroleum hydrocarbons derived from auto body storage and the dismantling/cleaning of engines /transmissions. Other potential sources of petroleum hydrocarbons storage tanks tanks (USTs) that contained gasoline and stov e oil and two above ground storage (ASTs) that stored waste oils. Northwest Auto Wrecking is a business owned by Gerald M. Haapla. -Conversations with Mr. Haapla indicates wrecking operations started in 1958 on about 5,000 square feet of ground and that he purchased the business in 1962. The property was owned by Haapla, D. Jensen, and Donald F. Jensen (Haapla & Jensen). Haapla & Paul D. Jensen, Marilyn o in turn assigned its Jensen agreed to sell the site to The Benaroya Company, L,L,C, who Sabey Corporation. rights under the contract to 10230 East Marginal LLC, a subsidiary Y rP The property transaction is scheduled to be completed by July 19, 2007. This remediation plan was prepared on behalf of 10230 East Marginal LLC necessary cleanup work. SITE DESCRIPTION g The property is approximately 6.8 acres in size and as been used as an auto site (now owned by 3301 South yard since the late- 1950s. The Associated Grocers (AG) Norfolk LLC, another subsidiary of Sabey Corporation) on the surrounds the est�coAW NWAW site NWAW north, east and south (Figure 2). A credit union exists The Duwamish River is and East Marginal Way South defines the west site boundary. located approximately 230 feet to the west from the site at the river's closest point. The NWAW property consists of three tax parcels that lie within either the City of Seattle or the City of Tukwila (Figure 2). Tax parcel 032304 -9062 comprises and 04230409015 of the site and lies within se ithin the City of Tukwila. aand lie w comprise the western po on of the s Existing site features are shown on Figure 3 and are outlined below: Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 2 July 2007 • Existing Structures. Several single -story buildings currently exist on the western portion of the site (along East Marginal Way South) including the following: o Office o Warehouse o Garage (with hydraulic hoists) o Canopy o Two Storage buildings (occupied by tenants that will vacate at closing) o Storage shed • Former Structures. A parts cleaning and was formerly was byrfire in on the north side of the garage. This 1987. • Tanks. Several above ground storage tanks (ASTs) and underground storage tanks (USTs) are /were present on the site. o ASTs containing waste oils are present on the east side of the garage. o A UST containing gasoline was formerly present near the northwest corner of the garage. This UST store stove in 9 o Historic USTs use e o 1 were /are on the south side of the garage. The status of these historic USTs is not known. • Paving. Asphalt paving covers the western and extreme northern portion of the site in the vicinity of the existing buildings. Elsewhere on the site, concrete paved access roads and pads separate unpaved "dirt" areas. The concrete paving was present by at least 1974 based on historic aerial photographs. Conversations with Gerry Happla, the owner /operator since the wrecking yard was established in 1962, indicates the paving was placed near the beginning of the wrecking yard operations in 1962 or 1963. • Auto -body Storage. The central and eastern portions of the site were used for the storage of "wrecked" auto bodies. This area contains a series of concrete access roads and pads that separate unpaved cells currently and/or historically used for auto body storage. • Soil Stockpiles. Two soil stockpiles exist within the northeastern portion of the site. These include the "North Stockpile" and the "LCS Stockpile ". petroleum o North Stockpile — Was created in or about 1993 following a p spill on the adjacent AG site. Petroleum o to mend soil as excavated and stockpiled and reportedly underwent contains an estimated 2,800 cubic yards of material. Imported fill used to fill the excavation contained demolition edebris from the site in 1998 by EHS- material (ACM). The ACM was International. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 3 July 2007 o LCS Stockpile — Was created in 199w from within a portion of the concrete pads here abundant crushed battery casings were scattered along/near the ground surface. The stockpile contains an estimated 3,000 cubic yards of soil. • Battery Chip Fill. Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. reports that battery chip fill is still present in the area immediately south of the north stockpile. • Detention Ponds. Detention ponds are located in the northwest corner of the site. These ponds apparently drain northward towards a detention pond located on the AG site. SITE HYDROGEOLOGY The NWAW site lies within the Duwamish Valley elevation valle re approximately 10 to 20 feet NAVD 88. Higher elevation glaciated up lands border Typically ground water flows from the uplands to the valley where discharge occurs into surface water such as the Duwamish River. The ground surface is immediately underlain by a layer of fill that extends to depths up to three feet below existing grades. Below the fill, interbedded silty sand to silt layers extend to depths of up to seven to ten feet. Silty f fine to ten sand d to fine to coarse sand were encountered below depths of approximately Ground water lies at depths of between . approximately one to seven feet below ground surface. Water level measurements made by Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. in January 2007 indicates a generally westerly flow direction in shallow ground water. SUMMARY OF SOIL AND GROUND -WATER QUALITY DATA As part of their subsurface investigation, Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. completed soil and ground -water sampling on the site. Exploration locations are shown on Figure 4. These data are summarized below to identify contaminants and media of concern. Soil Quality Data and Soil Contaminants of Concern Most of the available soil quality data are summarized in Tables 1 and of the 1 to this Environmental Strategies 2007 report. These tables are included in Attachment remediation plan. Analyses were made for metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chr dowel m, lead, mercury, selenium, silver and zinc) and petroleum hydrocarbons (gasoline, and oil -range hydrocarbons and benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes). Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Pale 4 July 2007 To identify potential soil contaminants of concern (COCs), the data were compared to unrestricted site use cleanup levels (CULs) established by the Model Toxics Control Act or MTCA (Chapter 173 -340 WAC). Method A CUWe� not available. Method B CULs Method B CULs were used when Method A values were obtained from the CLARC database (as of July 2007) on Ecology's web site. Maximum detected soil concentrations are compared to the CULs in Table 1. Based on the comparisons in Table 1, the soil COCs include the following: o Arsenic o Cadmium o Lead o Diesel range hydrocarbons o Oil -range hydrocarbons Some other soil quality data is available in reports prepared by Marsh Industrial Research (2005) and Geoengineers (1996) as presented in Appendix D to the Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. 2007 report. Tables from these reports are also included in Attachment 1. In 1996 Geoengineers collected and analyzed soil samples near the reported spill of fuel from the AG site within the northeast corner of the NWAW property. Diesel and heavy - oil range hydrocarbon concentrations were below the current to 2 of 2,000 mg/kg. However, gasoline -range hydrocarbon, benzene, ethylbenz nt , concentrations detected in soil samples from G --MW s data, 2 located near the tituentss are AG/NWAW property line exceeded cleanup levels. Based considered "local" soil COCs within the northeastern portion of the site. Geoengineers also analyzed three surface soil a � in these soma surface MW-1 to G- MW-3 for asbestos. No asbestos was detected Metal Concentrations in Soil. Surface concentrations (less than 0.5 feet deep) for arsenic, cadmium and lead are shown on Figures 5, 6, and 7. Concentrations of two or more of these metals exceed MTCA cleanup levels in the North Stockpile, LCS Stockpile, the area south of the detention pond (s occurred athe ocations TP 07, BOSand site (TP -21, B04 and B06). Single metal exceedanc TP -13 (lead), and TP -09 (cadmium). Metal concentrations in deeper soils are lower and do not exceed metal cleanup levels based on data from test pits TP10, TP -11 and TP -18. Samples from these pits were collected from depths of between 2.5 and 3.5 feet. obes GP- -951 to samples 95 Sdid not exceed near the water table (one foot above) from geoprobes levels (data is included in Attachment 1). Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan —Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 5 July 2007 P. ptrolPum Hydrocarbon Concentrations in Soil. Combined conce sons at to of diesel and heavy-oil range hydrocarbons exceeded cleanup levels m B04, B05 and B06 and TP -21. These samples were likely obtained ed xceeded with visual staining. As noted above, in 1996, constituents common to gasoline staining• cleanup levels in the northeastern portion of the site. Ground -Water Quality Data and Ground -Water Contaminants of Concern led a number of times and for a Ground water beneath the NWAW site has been sam locations are shown on Figure 4 number of constituents as summarized below. Sample and the analytical results are summarized in Table 2. • 1996 — Geoengineers (1996) installed and sampled three wells (G -MW-1 to G- MW -3 on Figure 4) within the northeastern portion of the site. Samples were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons and dissolved lead. Table 2 from the Geoengineers report summarizes the data and is included in Attachment 2. S installed five wells (GP- 01 • 2005 — In 2005, Environmental Services Network (ESN) a geoprobe O1 to GP-05 on Figure 4) within the eastern Samples were analyzed by SPECTRA p rig for Marsh Industrial Research. Samp analyzed � all the samples while etroletories. r Total r on dissolved almetals the sample from GP -03. The laboratory petroleum hydrocarbons data sheets are included in Attachment 2. • 2006, ESN installed and sampled an additional five wells using a geoprobe (GP- APL-951 to -955 on Figure 4). Analyses were conducted for total metals and petroleum hydrocarbons. The laboratory summary of the hydrocarbon analyses is included in Attachment 21. • 2007 — Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. resampled wells GP -1, GP -3 and GP -4 and installed five additional wells using a geoprobe. Ground water samples were obtained and analyzed from three new wells (0fo d ss01 P03/MW-02; P08/MWO4 on Figure 4). Analyses were conducted petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The results are summarized in tables from the Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. report in Attachment 2. level evaluation was performed to identify ground -water COCs. Based on A screening proximity to the the location of the site in the Duwamish Industrial Ar Area tod the silt 's t he Duwamish River, fresh water - chronic criteria were Filtering of the samples minimizes the turbidity Total metals analyses of ground-water samples ae considered unreliable because of the likely Quid of particulates into the samples submitted of the samples and provides a more representative analysis of the metal concentrations dissolved in water. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 6 July 2007 (EPA 2006). Where fresh water chronic criteria were not ava fable, Mario Meit oria aror B ground -water cleanup levels (WAC 173-340-720) were listed on Table 2. Based comparison of the ground -water quality data with the criteria discussed above, the following constituents are identified as ground -water COCs: • Northeast Portion of Site (primarily based on data from 1996 analyses) o Lead o Gasoline -range hydrocarbons o Benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylene o Diesel- and heavy -oil range hydrocarbons • Remainder of Site o Benzene (P01/MW-01 — in former UST excavation) o Diesel -range hydrocarbons (P08/MWO4 — beneath former parts cleaning/dismantling shop) DESIGNATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL to As part of the previous studies, a number of samples as a characteristic dangerous assess whether any of the material would designate (DW) under Chapter 173 -303 WAC (Dangerous Waste Regulations). These include analyses by Marsh Industrial Research ( "leaded soil pile", W -24 and C -36) and Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. The results are summarized below: Total Lead TCLP Lead Tot l Arsenic TCLPmArsenic rnt Sample LCS Stock s ile TP -01 -03 TP02 -03 TP02 -06 "leaded soil • ile" North Stock s ile TP3 -04 TP4 -04 TP4 -05 TP5 -02 WF -24 C -36 m 8830 7970 8900 4000 146 521 171 282 1300 810 m 112 126 37 <1 <1 3.2 <1 46 2.4 209 15& 68.6 52 7.5 19.2 9.8 9.0 <5 38 <1 <1 <0.05 lity No samples designed as characteristic DW based on the leiabi DW and w 11 need tHowever, of arsc. samples with relatively high concentrations of lead designated be handled accordingly. This includes soil in the LCS stockpile and some soil in the North Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 7 July 2007 j _ materials on the site with relatively high_ lead concentrations may Stockpile. .SO1Ti�. other maws also designate as characteristic DW. PRE - REMEDIAL SAMPLING To further refine the remedial approach, additional sampling will be completed. The objectives of the sampling and sampling locations are described below. Surface Soil Sampling — Southeast Portion of NWAW Site and Purpose. Surface soil removal was completed within the southeast the ast pile. The of Basis rP the site to remove battery chips. This > s the material that was placed remediation purpose of the sampling is to provide data to assess whether any needs to be completed in this general area. Locations /Analyses. Surface soil samples (0 to 0.5 feet) will be obtained will be a 3-spot the unpaved portions of the general area d for total arsenic, cadmium and lead. An composite sample that will be analy samples will be obtained and analyzed. estimated thirty -seven samples and three duplicate In addition, any visual evidence of oil staining will be noted and mapped. The results of the metal analyses will be compared to MTCA CULs using Ecology approved statistical procedures. Based on these analyses and visual observations, the need for any additional soil removal will be determined. Surface Soil Sampling — Central Portion of NWAW Site concentrations of lead Basis and Purpose. Surface soils in � is area oweveradata is not available to assess (approximately 885 mg/kg to 1,580 gig) whether these soils would designate as DW. Locans /Anal ho Y ses. Four surface soil samples would be collected from ocd TCLTP -21, B04, B05 and B06 (Figure 8). These samples would be analyzed for and cadmium. Detention Pond Area Basis and Purpose. The detention pond lies in an area wher high lead ed petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were detected. No samples have purpose of the sampling sediments within the ponds or one east d soil oneeat ponds. de of pond. is to assess the quality of pond sediment Locations /Analyses. Two sediment samples and two (3-spot seomposit ) soils will es will be collected from the locations shown on Figure 8. The Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 8 July 2007 analyzed for total arsenic, cadmium and lead, petroleum hydrocarbons (gasoline, diesel les will and heavy -oil hydrocarbons and BTEX), asbestos and PCBs. The two soil samp be analyzed for arsenic, cadmium, lead, petroleum hydrocarbons and asbestos. Beneath Existing Site Paving Basis and Purpose. Aerial photographs and conversations ated because much of the that soil beneath existing pavement should be uncon purpose of sampling paving was placed at the beginning of the wrecking operations. The pup beneath the paving is to confirm this finding. e t th Locations /Analyses. Five soil samples will be obtained from beneath paving at the locations shown on Figure 8. The samples will be obtained lead from beneath any paving sub- grade. Analyses will be made for arsenic, cadmium, and petroleum hydrocarbons. APPROACH TO SITE REMEDIATION The following sections describe the recommended approach to site based on the pre - remedial sampling However, modification to this approach may occur described above and on input from the selected contractor(s) with the approval of Sabey and DOF. General Approach contract, Prior to taking possession of the property, 10230 East Marginal LLC will, by r to the require that car bodies, engines, waste oils etc. be removed � hed.e These.m�lude the start of remediation, several existing structureswill be demoland Shed shown on Figure 3. Office, Warehouse, Garage (and hydraulic lifts), Available data indicates that soil contamination primarily occurs in surface soils beneath most of the site. These soils will be excavated and disposed off site as non-DW. that designate as characteristic DW will be treated on site consistent with Ecology's Technical Information Memorandum (TIM) titled Treatment by 2004). This issue is discussed further below. Some deeper excavation may be required because of petroleum hydrocarbons and/or the possible presence of USTs. These areas include: • Northeast portion of the site where Geoengineers detected contaminated ground water. • Former location of a gasoline UST. • Former location of a parts cleaning/dismantling building. • Possible location of stove oil USTs. • Location of the garage hydraulic lifts. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 9 July 2007 With cleanup of soils on the Northwest Auto Wrecking property, the potential migration of contamination to ground water should be significantly reduced. Health and Safety Plan 10230 Prior to the start of the remediation, the contractor(s) will prepare wed as part of theo medial East Marginal LLC a health and safety plan that will be work. The contractor(s) will certify that the workers on the site have had the appropriate health and safety training. Utility and Existing Well Locating wells will be located and marked in Prior to the start of excavation, utilities and existing sells cannot be saved, the field. The wells will be protected ensed drilling contractor in accordance with 173- 160 -560 they will be abandoned by a h WAC. Excavation and Stockpiling The general remediation area will be marked in the field by DOF. vatinn may bwith needed shallow excavation, an initial 0.5 feet will be removed. Additional excae es will be based on visual observation of debris and/or oily stained excavation bottom lto further guide periodically obtained for laboratory analysis from samples will be analyzed on a rapid turn-a- round extent of excavation. If appropriate, these round basis. It is Shallow soils will be stockpiled by area and will be tested to assess tons of additional hallow currently estimated that approximately cubic this material may need to be treated on- soil may need to be disposed off-site. Some of on- site. Shallow soils in the battery-chip area will be excavated and plaace in e LCS as kp le. It is anticipated that these materials will need to be handled in the soils in the stockpile. The contractor(s) will work with staff from DOF with respect to determining the extent of hn Some delay between excavation and backfilling (if necessary) excavation and sampling. g- disru lion in work flow will be may occur because of laboratory turn - around. Any p minimized with close coordination between the contractor and consultant. Exploratory explorations and testing will likely be required in the following areas: • Northeast portion of the site where Geoengineers detected contaminated ground water. • Former location of a gasoline UST. • Former location of a parts cleaning/ dismantling building. Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 10 July 2007 • Possible location of stove oil USTs. • Location of the garage hydraulic lifts. on A backhoe or similar equipment will be used to dig test is to allos obervea servati o 1 will deeper site soils in these areas. If evidence of soil contamination either be excavated for off -site disposal or testing will be completed to assess whether the soil exceeds cleanup levels. Some removal of pond sediment may be necessary, depending on the results of the pre - remediation sampling. This material will likely be placed in a lined stockpile to allow drainage or be mixed with other soil for off -site disposal. Existing Stockpiles So The LCS Stockpile contains characteristic DW and will be treated st on it(. 2m material in the North Stockpile may be characteristic DW based on Marsh Industrial Research. Soils in this portion of the pile will be i place likely be LCS stockpile material. Additional testing of soils in the North S necessary for disposal purposes. Handling of Water It is not anticipated that a significant volume of water will be generated during the remedial work. Some water may be generated during the deeper remedial excavations or durin excavation of pond sediment (if required). Should water need to be handled, it g storage tank for testing and proper disposal. will be pumped to a temporary g Surface water management will consist of berming and sloping the excavation areas (as needed) such that all runoff is directed into the excavation. Under circum an stances is se any construction runoff to exit the work site. The contractor approach/plan to deal with this issue. Handling Debris Some debris may be encountered during the excavations. The contractor will make excavation for two reasons; 1) So that diligent efforts to segregate large debris during the material is acceptable to the disposal company, and 2) to possibly qualify as non - contaminated at a reduced disposal fee. Treatment of Characteristic DW Characteristic DW will be treated on site to reduce the e leachability of lead to eitu levels below DW criteria. The proposed treatment process a process in which an element of a mineral is irreversibly chable) chemical structure for element (e.g. lead) to create a more stable (i.e. l ess leachable) the metal content in the soil. A bench -scale treatability analysis was completed to assess the effectiveness of the Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. Remediation Plan —Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 11 July 2007 tr proposed treatment rocess. The results are described in the Sound Environmental ent � les from the LCS pile with TCLP Strategies (2007) report (Section 8.2.1). Test samples ed to ADT in Portland, lead. concentrations between 112 and 126 mg/1 were shipped for evaluation. ADT evaluated various mixtures of treatment additives to neutralize the leachability of lead in the samples. ill test results show that material in the LCS stockpile an be e tressf nt The treatab ty treated using the ADT process to de- characterize the lead leachability. and apatite crystallization, the treated waste samples no longer exhibited shows is TCLP lead p leachability characteristic. Treated associated ated with this waste. stockpile below the 5 mg/1 criterion Prior to on-site treatment of the characteristic DW material the following tasks will be completed. • A Waste Analysis Plan (WAP) will be prepared. This plan will describe the types and quantities of wastes that will result from the atreat e to t uefforts, during describes the approach to waste minimization and t the remediation. • A Site Identification From will be submitted to Ecology to obtain a RCRA ID#. Disposal of Contaminated Materials Contaminated soil and water will be disposed off-site. Soil could be transported to a municipal landfill at such facility and uniticos of disposal will be identified by the The disposal/treatment tY tickets, manifests and/or contractor. The contractor will pbe included with the remedial report that is disposal certificates. These to the Washington State Department of Ecology. Backfilling if deeper excavation is required. Backfill will consist Some backfilling may necessary P currently as�g lot of the of clean soil previously stockpiled by Sama erial not available, parking pit -run sand and adjacent AG property. In the event this will be imported and used as backfill. The backfill will be placed in lifts of 1 -foot or less and compacted using vibratory equipment to a density equivalent or better than the exiting ll onsite t . An alternate to compacted backfill would be to use crushed rock or recycled be P placed without compaction over wet or saturated s o �miniinize ground water adequate sues working base. This would allow rapid backfil ing related to the backfill process. Reporting After the remedial excavation work is completed, a remedial report will be prepared an Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc . Remediation Plan — Northwest Auto Wrecking Site Page 12 July 2007 submitted to Ecology. It is anticipated that 10230 East Marginal LLC .0 will request a No Further Action designation for the site as part of Ecology's Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). This report will serve to support this request. REFERENCES Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology), 2004, Technical Information Memorandum - Treatment by Generator, Publication 96 -412, Revised May 2004. EPA, 2006, National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Office of Water /Office of Science and Technology (4304T). ESN (Environmental Services Network), Laboratory �d data package h, May 382006. completed on March 31, 2006, Prepared for Geoengineers, 1996, Ground Water Characterization Report — aster Auto WreNorthwest Auto Wrecking Facility, Seattle,Washington, Prepared for Inc., February 9, 1996. Marsh Industrial Research, 2005, Monitoring Wells at Northwest Wrecking — Seattle, Initial Report, Prepared for Don and Paul Jenson, September 19, 2005. 2007, Subsurface Investigation Report and Sound Environmental Strategies Corp., Property, Pre aced for Remedial Approach for Cleanup, Northwest Auto Wrecking p rty P Benaroya Companies, March 21, 2007. TABLE 1 - Soil Quality Data Comparisons Constituent Metals (mg /kg) Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver Number Detections 30 30 11 30 30 Zinc Petroleum H drocarbons mg /kg) 2 1 0 1 30 Gasoline Ranee Diesel Range Oil Range Benzene Eth (benzene Toluene X lenes 6 4 0 1 1 1 Sample Number 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 21 21 21 21 Maximum Concentration (mg /kg) 209 279 35.1 28.5 8900 0.45 <1 1.2 1030 71 20000 45000 <0.02 0.1 0.13 0.49 Cleanup Level (mg /kg) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Method (a) 20 A 1600 2 2000 250 400 400 24000 100 b 2000 2000 0.03 6 7 9 B A A A A B B B A A A A A A A Notes: (a) - Based on unrestricted site uses (b) - Based on gasoline mixture without benzene present Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 1 (Soil Quality Data NWAW- Sheetl) TABLE 2 - Ground -Water Quality Data Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Location Date G -MW -1 1/3/1996 G -MW -2 1/3/1996 G -MW -3 1/3/1996 GP- APL -951 3/31/2006 GP- APL -952 3/31/2006 GP- APL -953 3/31/2006 GP- APL -954 3/31/2006 GP- APL -955 3/31/2006 Preliminary GW CULs Basis Dissolved Metals (ug /l) Arsenic ----- ---- -- ----- -- -- -- - 150 Freshwater chronic Barium - - -- ----- - ---- - -- ---- - -- 3200 MTCA Method B Cadmium ----- - -- ----- - - -- - -- ---- - --- 0.25 (a) Freshwater chronic Chromium - --- - --- - - - --- 74 (a) Freshwater chronic Lead <3 4.7 <3 - - -- - - ---- ----- 2.5 (a) Freshwater chronic Mercury - -- - -- -- -- - - - - -- 0.77 Freshwater chronic Selenium - - -- ---- -- - - ----- ----- --- - 5 Freshwater chronic Silver - -- - - -- -- ---- ----- - -- 3.2 Freshwater acute Zinc - - -- -- -- - -- - --- ----- - - -- 120 (a) Freshwater chronic Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg /I) Gasoline -Range 0.12 69 0.5 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.31 <0.1 0.8 MTCA Method A Diesel -Range 0.59 1.6 1.6 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.5 MTCA Method A Oil -Range <0.71 0.8 1.1 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 0.5 MTCA Method A Detected VOCs (ug /I) 1,2,4 - Trimethylbenzene -- -- - -- - -- - - - -- 400 MTCA Method B Benzene <0.5 180 1.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 5 MTCA Method A Ethylbenzene <0.5 3300 8.7 <1 <1 <1 <1. <1 700 MTCA Method A lsopropylbenzene -- -- - ----- - - -- - -- - - -- na na n- Propylbenzene ---- - - - - -- - - na na Naphthalene - -- - - -- - -- -- --- -- - 160 MTCA Method A sec- Butlybenzene -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- na na Toluene <0.5 5100 <0.5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1000 MTCA Method A Xylenes <0.5 14000 0.71 <1 <1 <1 5.3 <1 1000 MTCA Method A Other VOCs - -- - - -- - -- ----- - ----- - - -- - -- Notes: Not analyzed Source: Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. (2007) (a) - Assumed hardness -100 mg /I CaCO3 na - Not available Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 2 of 2 (GW Quality Data NWAW - Sheet /) TABLE 2 - Ground -Water Quality Data Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Location Date GP -1 8/29/2005 GP -1 1/19/2007 GP -2 8/29/2005 GP -3 8/29/2005 GP -3 1/19/2007 GP-4 8/29/2005 GP-4 1/19/2007 GP -5 8/29/2005 MW -01 1/19/2007 MW -02 1/19/2007 MW -04 1/19/2007 Dissolved Metals (ug /I) Arsenic <2 <1 <2 <2 5.67 <2 1.98 <2 7.22 3.64 24 Barium 8 2.65 6 9 16.9 7 3.8 8 12.6 11.7 16.6 Cadmium <3 <1 <3 <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <1 <1 <10 Chromium <7 4.49 <7 <7 1.54 <7 2.1 <7 1.53 3.02 <10 Lead <2 1.91 <2 <2 3.24 <2 4.64 <2 <1 <1 <10 Mercury <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2. <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 Selenium <50 <1 <50 <50 <1 <50 <1 <50 <1 4.48 <10 Silver <7 <1 <7 <7 <1 <7 <1 <7 <1 <1 <10 Zinc -- <10 - - 17.8 - 13 . <10 <10 20.5 Petroleum Hydrocarbons (mg /I) Gasoline -Range - -- <0.10 - <0.05 <0.10 - -- <0.10 - - -- 0.54 <0.10 <0.10 Diesel -Range -- <0.071 --- <0.20 0.14 -- <0.054 - - -- 0.33 0.084 0.77 Oil -Range -- <0.36 - -- <1.0 <0.27 - _ <0.27 -- <0.28 <0.28 0.5 Detected VOCs (ug /I) 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene - ---- _- ___- . _- - -- -_ -_ 1.8 <1 <1 Benzene ---- <1 -- <1 <1 ---- <1 ---- 7.4 <1 <1 Ethylbenzene - - -- <1 -- <1 <1 ---- <1 - -- 25 <1 <1 Isopropylbenzene - -- _ -- _ - -- -- - ----- 6.4 <1 <1 n- Propylbenzene - -- ----- - - ----- ---- - -- 7.7 <1 <1 Naphthalene - -_ ___- -- r - -_ - -- 8.8 <1 <1 sec - Butlybenzene ----- - -- -- -- - - -- -- - 1.8 <1 <1 Toluene - - -- <1 - <1 <1 ---- <1 -- --- 1 <1 <1 Xylenes -- <3 - <2 <3 - <3 - 3.6 <3 <3 Other VOCs _ - -_ _ -_- - -- -_ - -_ - ___- nd nd nd Notes: - ---- - Not analyzed Source: Sound Environmental Strategies Corp. (2007) (a) - Assumed hardness -100 mg /I CaCO3 na - Not available Dalton, Olmsted Fuglevand, Inc. Page 1 of 2 (GW Quality Data NWAW - Sheet /) TOFOI map printed on 02%27%07 from "Wash!ngton.tpo" and "undded.:o0" ° WG584 122 010.000' W 122 16.000' W 122°14.000' W 122 °20.000' W 122 °18.000' W • 122 °24.000' W 122 °22.000' W `•- _ •.,•••••••�;I \ D a • . b'f 1a °aFGlriiim.a 1 • �1�n�_ �I lid-t l 3t �1�,�_ ---`- z N M z 0 m a z O 122 °24.000' W 1 :S` 122 °16.000' W aiv 122 °14.000' W 122 °22.000'�y 122 °20.000' W 12 .3 02 °18..5 W0 13 3-0 km ?rine' 1,0 ?0:[200 \uixsl Gcgmp =iidrn;naateDO.ccW Ref: Vicinity Map NWAW.cdr z 0 M O z 0 z O z Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington SAB- 029 -00 FIGURE 1 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglcvand, Inc. Credi Union 0423049102 0423049015 032304906 Seattle Ref: Tax Lot NWAW.cdr Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Tax Lot Parcel Numbers SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 2 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted 8c Fuglevand, Inc. LCS Soil North Soil Stockpile Stockpile Battery Chip Fill [4".4.4WMPAistied1.0441944 • 1 • Canopy Waste 011ASTs Former Parts Cleaning and Dismantling Shop Former Gasoline UST 411 • mu _ ___ Catch Basin • Approximate Locations of Historic STove 011USTs Other Features: Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Ref: Site Features 2 .cdr Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Rite Survey (Barghausen 2007) 11111 Unpaved ("DIRT") ED Asphalt paving Concrete paving Structures to remain Structures to be demolished Mal 0 100 Scale In Feet (approximate) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Pre-Remediation Site Features SAB-029-01 FIGURE 3 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile LCS Stockpile :TP • BO G-14/-2 E -24 C -36 WF -24 3 i'?.TP14 GP -02 TP,1. B04 • • 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: SpI. Locations.cdr GP-APL -953 P PL-955 1t ® P09 /MW05 �' r P08NvIW04 GP r - - �.� •� GP- APL -951 Sample Locations: Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Tltle Survey (Barghausen 2007). WF -24 0 North Stockpile Spl. (2005) B03 -- Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP -02 -43t- Geoprobe/ Mont. Well (2005;2006) Test Pit Sample (2007) TP08 G -MW -1 Monitoring Well (1996) P08 /NIWQ4 ® Geoprobe /Monitoring Well (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Sample Locations SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 4 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile 3.5to38 ■ LCS Stockpile 7.0 to 209 E -24 C -36 WF -24 084 tzr TM 3 11 (0.5') z- 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: As Surface Soils 2.cdr • • • Arsenic Conc. : Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTNACSM Land Tile Survey (Barghausen2007) Green - less than 20 mg /kg As ® Red - greater than 20 mg /kg As 68 (0.5') As Conc. (mg /kg) (SpI, Depth) WF -24 r] North Stockpile SpI. (2005) B03 -$- Surface Soli Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP -02 -- Geoprobe (2006) TP08 Test Pit Sample (2007) G -MW 1 Q Monitoring Well (1996) P08/MWO4 Geoprobe / Monitoring Well (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Arsenic in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 5 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile <1 to 1.4 • LCS Stockpile <1 to 5.9 • z IT;i551 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) 1 • 1 • VIF,44,', Ref: Cd Surface Soils 2.cdr Cadmium Conc. Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land 'rifle Survey (Barghausen 2007) BE Green - less than 2 mg/kg Cd MI Red - greater than 2 mg/kg Cd 1.4 (0.5') Cd Conc. (mg/kg) (Sol. Depth) WF-24 North Stockpile Sol. (2005) B03 --E3- Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP-02 Geoprobe (2006) TP08 Test Pit Sample (2007) G-MW-1 Monitoring Well (1996) Geoprobe/MonitorIng P08/MWO4 Well (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking SeattlefTukwila, Washington Cadmium in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB-029-01 FIGURE 6 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile LCS Stockpile z-. — — -195 TPlS !B05 z TP 9 ?� 0`6,1 r � 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: Pb Surface Soils 2.cdr Lead Conc. : Sound Env. Strategies Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey (Barghausen 2007) ini Green - less than 250 mg /kg Pb EMI Orange - greater than 250 mg /kg Pb ® Red - Fall TCLP Pink - > 250 mg /kg and May Fail TCLP 268(0.5') Pb Conc. (mg/kg) (Spl. Depth) WF -24 in North Stockpile SpI. (2005) B03 -E13-- Surface Soil Sample (2007) B02 • Hand Boring (2007) GP -02 4 Geoprobe (2006) TP08 11 Test Pit Sample (2007) G -MW -1 Q Monitoring Well (1996) P08 /MW04 ® WeGeoprobll (2007e /) Monitoring Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Lead in Surface Soils (less than 0.5' deep) SAB- 029 -01 FIGURE 7 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted 8c Fuglevand, Inc. North Stockpile E-24 C-36 WF-24 z 15eGT■il 0 100 Scale in Feet (approximate) Ref: Pre Rem Spl.cdr TP13 356 Sae Legend 0 Pre-Remedlal Soil Sample Location '4N 350j \ .257 0 Lead Conc. : Sound Env. Strategles Corp. (2007) Base: ALTA/ACSM Land Ittie Survey (Barghausen 2007) Green - less than 250 mg/kg Pb Orange - greater than 250 mg/kg Pb Red - Fail TCLP Pb my-J=1 4:4117!)imi Pink -> 250 mg/kg and May Fall TCLP Pb 268 Pb Conc. (mg/kg) B03-113- Surface Soil Sample (2007) TP08 Test Pit Sample (2007) Northwest Auto Wrecking Seattle/Tukwila, Washington Pre-Remediation Soil Sampling SAB-029-01 FIGURE 8 June 2007 Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand, Inc. • • Attachment 1 Soil Data From Previous Reports OUND NVIRONMENIAL TRATEGIES. www.soundenvironmental.com Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - Total and TCLP Metals NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Area of Contamination Solt Sample ID Sample Date Sample Depth (feet bgs) Arsenic' ( mg/kg) Barium' ( mg/kg) Cadmium' ( mg/kg) Chromium' ( mg/kg) Lead' ( mg/kg) Mercury' ( mg/kg) Selenium' (mg /kg) Silver' ( mg/kg) Zinc' (mg/kg) TCLP Arsenic' (mg /L) TCLP Lead3 (mg/L) Stockpile Areas TP01 -03 1/1012007 3' 209 279 4.00 13.8 12.3 8.830] 7,340 <0.2 <0.2 <1 <1 <1 432 <1 - _ TP01 -06 1/10/2007 6' 64.0 147 5.74 <1 938 - TP02.03 1/10/2007 3' 153 190 5.92 15.4 7.970 <0.2 <1 <1 651 <1 - TP02 -06 1/10/2007 6' 63.6 154 3.46 12.3 8.900 <0.2 <1 <1 612 - . -: . LCS Stockpile Area TP02 -08 1/10/2007 8' 6.99 39.8 <1 7.02 19.3 <0.2 <1 <1 28.8 - - (AOC 01) TP03 -02 1/11/2007 2' 7.00 28.8 <1 8.49 143 <0.2 <1 <1 10.1 - - TP03 -04 1/11/2007 4' 7.52 65.2 <1 11.9 146 <0.2 <1 <1 32.2 - <1 TP03 -06 1/1112007 6' 5.56 42.9 <1 9.96 38.6 <0.2 <1 <1 22.2 -- -- TP13 -0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 10.8 61.6 <1 8.34 356 <0.2 <1 <1 84.9 -- - TP14-0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 7.29 53.8 <1 6.21 72.6 <0.2 <1 <1 49.9 - TP04.02 1/11/2007 2' 4.71 120 <1 10.7 57.1 <0.2 <1 <1 121 - - <1 TP04.04 1/11/2007 4' 19.2 67.7 1.42 8.94 521 <0.2 <1 <1 531 -- North Stockpile Area TP04 -05 TP05 -02 TP05.04 TP05 -07 . TP12-0.5 1/11/2007 1/11/2007 1/11/2007 1/1012007 1/12/2007 5' 2 4' 7' 0.5 9.78 8.95 5.39 .._3.54 22.4 61.4 57.7 67.3 ....131 88.9 <1 <1 <1 - <t_- _ 1.75 12.6 114 9.78 _ . 9:66 9.87 171 232 31.2 .17. .2i. 1.490 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2_._.. <0.2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 23.5 81.4 39.9 40.2 328 - - -- 3.19 <1. -- General Distribution Area General Distribution and - Slorage Area (AOC 43) . 004 -00.25 1/19/2007 0.25 27.3 122 35.1 33 1530 <0.2 <1 <1 766 -- -- - __ _ -- - - B05.00.25 1/19/2007 0.25 16.8 132 20.3 28.5 1420 0.22 <1 1.21 1030 006 -00.25 TP06-0.5 TP07.0.5 1/19/2007 1 /11 /2007 1/11/2007 0.25 0.5 0.5 6.68 12.4 15.7 80.8 54.9 54.4 49.7 8.51 <1 <1 <1 21.6 10.7 9.62 835 27.3 263 <0.2 <0.2 0.45 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 753 59.2 72.6 TP08 -0.5 1/11/2007 0.5 11.8 10.2 89.0 <0.2 <1 <1 48'7 TP09 -0.5 1/11/2007 0.5 7.18 64.2 4.10 11.9 177 <0.2 <1 <1 102 -- - TP10 -2.5 1/11/2007 2.5 10.6 81.1 ' <1 13.5 110 <0.2 <1 <1 64.5 -- - - _._._ -- -- TP11-3.5 ._ TP15 -0.5 - TP18 -2.5 1/11/2007 _1/12/2007_ 1/12/2007 3.5 0.5 7.45 __6.79__ 4.25 135 _31.8_ 110 <1 <1 20.3 4.92 24.2 115 <0.2 <0.2 <1 <9 <1 <1 33.0 76.0 - -- _- 2.5 <1 10.9 33.2 <0.2 <1 <1 42.7 - TP19 -0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 5.67 35.4 1.38 5.28 21.7 <0.2 <1 <1 42.0 -- ' Tank and Parts Cleaning Area Maintenance' Buildings Containing Tanks and Parts Cleaning Area (AOC 64) TP21 -0 .5 1/12/2007 0.5 63.1 154 3.75 13.2 1 310 <0.2 <1 <1 332 -- - MTCA Method •A Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses' 20 NE 2 2.000 250 2 NE NE NE 5° 5° MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels for Commercial/Industrial Properties' 20 NE 2 2,000 1,000 2 NE NE NE 5' 5° NOTES Results in . denote reported concentration exceeds MTCA levels. 'Analyzed oy EPA Method 200.8 'Analyzed by EPA Method 200.2 in accordance with 40 CFR Pan 261. 'MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173. 340.900. Table 740.1. Method A Sol Cleanup Levels lo/ Unresu¢ted Land Uses 'MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173.3.10.900. Table 745 -1. Method A Sod Cleanup Levels for Industrial Properties 'Depth in feel below lop of stockpile. 'Toxicity Characteristics List (WAC 173-303.090). 1 Se5C.U•0Errr ee0 ACTS C551.1'i•` A, Oui0wrK.ng Taos, $a rrors5a• Mai. - • not analyzed < • analyte not detected above method defection limit bgs • below ground surface CFR • Code of Federal Regulations EPA = U.S. Environmental Proteclmn Agency 1= The infernal standard is out of laboratory Control 1101115: mooned value is an estimate LCS • lead•conlammaled soil mglkg • milligrams per kilogram mg/ l. • milligrams per liter MTCA • Model Tomes Control Act NE • not established TCLP • Toxxdy Ctarectenstic Leaching Procedure WAC • Washington Administrative Cole 1 of 1 OUND NVIRONMENTAL TRAHGIES www.soundenvironmental.com Table 2 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Area of Contamination Soll Sample ID Sample Date Sample Depth (feet bgs) GRPH' (mg/kg) DRPH' (mg/kg) GRPH' (mg/kg) Benzene' (mg/kg) Ethylbenzene4 (mg/kg) Toluene (mg0(9) Xytenes' (mg /k9) Stockpile Areas LCS Stockpile Area (AOC #1) B01-02 1/19/2007 2 <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 B03 -0L.25 1/19/2007 0.25 <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 TP03 -02 1/11/2007 2' <2 _ <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.08 TP03 -04 1/11/2007 4' <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 TP03 -06 1/11/2007 6' T <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.06 TP04 -02 1/11/2007 2' <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 06 North Stockpile Area (AOC #2) TP04 -04 1/11/2007 4' <2 83° <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 06 _ _ <0 06 <006 -_ <0.06 _ _ <0.06 <0 06 TP04 -05 1/11/2007 5' <2 __._ _ <2 <2 <50 <50 <50 <250 __ <250_. <250 <0.02 <0.02 _ <0.02 - <0.02 <0.02 _ <0.02 _ <0.02_ <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 _ _ TPOS -02 _.. TPO5-04 1/11/2007._ - - -._ 1/11/2007 .-__ _.__2'--_.__ -, 4' ___ TP05 -07 TP12.2.5 1/10/2007 1/12/2007 7 2.5 <2 <2 <50 <50 _- <250 <250 <0.02 <0 02 <0.02 <0.02 General Distribution Area General Distribution and Storage Area (AOC #3) B02 -03 B04 -00.25 1/19/2007 1/19/2007 1/19/2007 3 0.25 0.25 <2 <2 <2 <50 1,900' 1,400' <250 5.100 <0 02 <0 02 <002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 06 <0 06 <006 _ <0.06 _ 0,06 <0.06 0 49 _ <0.06 <0.06 <0.02 <0.02 B05 -00.25 5,300 <0.02 B06 -00.25 1/19/2007 0.25 <2 21:.000° <50 <50 610° <50 45.000 __ <250 <250 _- <250 _ <250 _ <0 02 _ <0.02 <0.02 - 0.02__ <0.02 _ _ <0.02 - <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 TP09.O.5 1/11/2007 0.5 <2 <0.02 TP10 -2.5 1/11/2007 - 2.5 3.5 <2 71 <0.02 TP11-3.5 1 /1. 1/2007 0.10 _ <0.02 0.13 TP11-08 1/11/2007 8 4 <0.02 TP18 -2.5 1/12/2007 2.5 <2 <50 <250 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02 Tank and Parts Cleaning Area Maintbnance Buildings Containing Cle Tanks and Pans Cleaning Area (AOC #4) P02-9 1/10/2007 9 <2 <50 <250 - - - __._ -_ -___ PO4 -8.5 1/10/2007 8.5 <2 <50 <250 - - -- _-_- __ -- _ P05 -10 1/10/2007 10 <2 <50 <250 - - - P06-7 P06 -7 1/10/2007 7 <2 <50 <250 - P07 -8.5 1/11/2007 8.5 <2 <50 <250 -- - - - - - - - -- - - -- --- -_- ._. -- - P06 -6 1/11/2007 6 <2 <50 <250 <250 - .- - - - -- - - - P08.12 1/11/2007 12 <2 <50 TP21-0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 <2 1,700' - TP21-6.5 1/12/2007 6.5 <2 <50 <250 - - -- - MTCA Method A Cleanu, Levels< 30 2,000 2,000 0.03 6 7 9 •OTES.. Results in E.. L: denote reported concentration exceeds MTCA levels. •Depth m feet below lop of stockprle. 'Analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH -Gx. 'Analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH -Dx. 'Analyzed by EPA Method 80218. 'MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173.340 -900, Table 740 -1. Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses. 'Depth In feet below lop of stockpile. 'The oattern of peaks is not Indicative of diesel. •.505CUnREra vn0JECtso5E5.apr.n,, VIN xue vnru,rgrrages:sn •adea5d. Pen 0c. < • analyte not detected above method detection hmn - • not analyzed bgs • below ground surface DRPH • diesel-range petroleum hydrocarbons GRPH • gasorine -range petroleum hydrocarbons LCS • lead - contaminated soil mgrkg • milligrams per kilogram MTCA • Model Tox,es Control Act ORPH • o4.range petroleum hydrocarbons 1 at 1 OUND NVIRONMENJAL 1RATEGIES Table 3 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Soil Sample ID Sample Data Sample Depth (feet bgs) O U 0 .- 1,1,1- Trtchloroehtane 1,1,2,2- Tetrachloroethane °c .c g H ,- .-. 1,1- DIchloroethane m � L o u •- ei .. 1,1- Dlchloropropene 1,2,3- Trlchlorobe nzene 1,2,3- Trtchloropropane 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzen e m H m i 0 . E 1- 4. r 1,2, -Dib romo-3- chloropropane 1,2- Dibormochloroethane (EDB) m e m N G 2 o _u 1,2- Dlchloroethane (EDC) 1,2- DIchlorpropane 1 ,3,5- Trlmethyl be nzene 1,3- Dlchlorobenzene Tan_ k 8 Part s Cleanin Area TP21 -0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 TP21.6.5 1/12/2007 6.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 P02 -9 1/10/2007 9 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 _ PO4-8.5 1/11/2007 8.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 P05 -10 1/10/2007 10 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 _ <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 _ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 _ <0.05_ <0.05 <0.05 _ _ <_0.05_ <0.05 <0.05 _<0.05_ <0.05 <0.05 _ <0.5__ <0.5 <0.5 <0.05_ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 P06 -7 P07 -8.5 P08-6 1/10/2007 1/11/2007 1/11/2007 7 8.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 6 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 P08 -12 1/11/2007 12 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses' NE 2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 0.005 NE NE NE NE NE NOTES' 'MICA Cleanup Regulation 173 -340 -900. Table 740.1. Method A Sail Cleanup Levels for Unreslncled Land U es. VOCs analyzed by EPA Method 62608. ..SE5 CURREYT 0901ECTS'056 ..x - :' YW Auro Waa.a.g.Tamn sd T•0•1•50.1. von < • analyle not detected above method detection Tamil bps below ground surface EPA = U.S. Environmental Prolecbon Agency MICA • Model Tomes Control Act NE • not established VOCs • volatile organ compounds 1 of 3 OUND NVIRONMENTAL TRATEGIES Table 3 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Soil Sample ID Sample Date Sample Depth (feet bgs) 1,3- Dlchloropropane 1,4Dlchlorobenzene 2,2- Dlchloropropane 2- Butanone (MEK) C 0 P- O O r r o C C =o r 4Chlorotoluene 0 C 0 C a O N .c 2 .1, Acetone O n i m Bromobenzene 1 Bromodlch lorometh ane O 0 o m Bromomethane Carboh Tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroethane Chloroform cls -1,2 -D I ch l oroethe ne 1 . c i s -1, 3 -D I c h l o ro p r o pe n e DIbromochloromethane Tank & Parts Cleaning Area TP21 -0.5 1/12/2007 0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 _ <0.1 <0_05_ <0.05 _ <0_05 TP21-6.5 1/12/2007 6.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 _ <0.05 <0.05' <0.05 <0.05 P02 -9 1/10/2007 9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 PO4 -8.5 1/11/2007 8.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 _ <0.1__ <0.05 <0.05 4.-06.. <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 P05 -10 P06-7 P07 -8.5 1/10/2007 1/10/2007 1/11/2007 - 10 7 8.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 P08 -6 1/11/2007 8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 <0.05 P08 -12 1/11/2007 12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses' NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 0.03 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE , NE NE .$ES CbPPEV- •R0,ECTS'U54W /.L-31 WIAuto wreck.q.T1ae.Sd TepeYSd • VOC1 2 of 3 OUND NVIRONMEN(AL TRATEGIES www.soundenvIronmental.com Table 3 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Soil Sample ID - Sample Date Sample Depth (feet bgs) Dibromomethane Dlcholordlfluoromethane • Ethylbenzene 'Hexachlorobutadlene a c N 0 a c e_' Methyl t -butyl ehter (MTBE) Methylene chloride C 0 'm 5 m z n- Propylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene o cN C a L m a co tart- Butylbenzene Tetrachloroethene (Toluene trans- 1,2 -DIchl orothene trans- 1,3- Dichloropropene Trlchloroethene Tri chl orofl uoromethan e Vinyl chlorlde o-Xylene Tank & Parts Cleaning Area TP21 -0.5 1112/2007 0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.10 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.10 TP21.6.5 1/12/2007 6.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.10_ P02-9 1/10/2007 9 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.10_ PO4 -8.5 1/11/2007 8.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.10 P05 -10 1/10/2007 10 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.10 P06-7 _ P07-8.5 . POB -6 P08 -12 1/10/2007 1/1112007 _ 1/1112007 1171/2007 7 _ 8.5 6 12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 .- <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ' <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 .. ..._ <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 .. .... <0.05 <0.10 <0.10 . .. <0.10 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 . <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 < 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ___,__..._ <0.05 <0.05 - - -_ <0.05 <0.05 .. .... .. <0.05 MTCA Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses' NE NE 6 NE NE 0.1 NE 5 NE NE NE NE NE 0.05 NE NE NE 0.03 NE NE 9 SES 0<5<551 000,5015 4 %5X1.;' w. Was A,ecurp.Tna Su 10,15. • 00<0 3of3 . •TABLE1. SUMMARY OF FIELD SCREENING AND SOIL ANALYTICAL DATA MONITORING WELL BORINGS • Northwest Auto Wrecking Facility Seattle, Washington r•�, r74 cut_ E 9 c. 2o0r) Document ID: 338902T1.WK1 - • • ' • Petro eum Hydrocarbons - • • • - = Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds3 • . Gasoline- Diesel- Heavy Sample Date Depth . • • (mg /kg) = . • range5 range6 O1I- rartge6 Numbers Sam 'led feet •• B E T X m. /k• m• /k• m•/llt. MW -1 -0.5 01/03/96 0.5 3.0 — — — — — <11 <46 MW -2 -0.57 01/03/96 0.5 12.2 .— — — — — — . — MW2 3,0 01/03/96 3,0 1,520 0,44 9.0 1.7 >: >•':;, >: €<:51 >s:c %:a 1 X00 'z'. 170 140 MW -2 -8 01/03/96 8.0 2,220 — — -- — — <14 <54 MW- 3.0.57 01/03/96 0.5 24,8 • — -- • — — — 140 ..,, ,.w1 30(P; MTCA Method A Cleenu • Level 0.5 20.0 40.0 20.0 S 100.0 200.0 200.0 r•�, r74 cut_ E 9 c. 2o0r) Document ID: 338902T1.WK1 it ESN NORTHWEST CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NW AUTO PROJECT Washington Marsh Industrial Research .,At al$ es' of G''asoiine lNWTP11 z)' &.. T `(4FA--TVletltpc1;8011.3) Sample Date Benzene Toluene Eftiplbenzene Xylenes . Gasoline:. Surrogate Number Analyzed: (mg /kg) (mglkg)'. .(ing /) g) . z'Citig/jtg ._. :...:'.my /k ); .. Recovery (%)... Method Blank 4/7/06 nd nd nd nd nd . • 104 Method Blank 4/9/06 nd nd . nd nd nd 93 LCS 4/9/06 107% 107% 109% 104% 72 APL 951 4/7/06 nd nd nd nd nd 96 APL 952 4/7/06 nd nd nd nd nd 123 APL 953 4/9106 nd nd nd nd nd 101 APL 954 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 125 APL 955 4/7/06 nd nd nd nd nd 80 Method Detection Limits .0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 10 "--- "Indicates not tested for component. "nd" Indicates not detected at the listed detection limits. ";int" Thdicates:.that interferenc .prevents determination. ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR SURROGATE (Chlorobenzene) & LCS : 65% TO 135% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: M. Farmer & M. Sebonia ESN NORTHWEST CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NW AUTO PROJECT Washington Marsh Industrial Research Heavy Metals in Soil by EPA -7000 Series Lead (Pb) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Arsenic (As) Sample Date EPA 7420 EPA 7130 EPA 7190 EPA 7061 Number ' Analyzed (mg/kg) ( mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) Method Blank 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd APL. 951 • 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd APL 952 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd APL :953 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd APL 954 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd APL`955 4/6/06 nd nd nd nd .Method Detection Limits 1 _ "nd" Indicates not detected at listed detection limits. ANALYSES PERFORMED BY:M. Sebonia 5, ESN NORTHWEST CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NW AUTO PROJECT Washington Marsh Industrial Research Analyses of Diesel & Oil (NVVTPH-Dx/Dx Extended) in Soil Sample Date . Surrogate Diesel ' .0i1 Mineral 'Oil. Number Analyzed . Recovery (%) .. :(0fg.11t-e .. .tik/lce vieteg) ... Method Blank ' 4/7/06 - 99 nd nd nd APL 951 4/7/06 120 nd nd nd APL 952 4/7/06 90 nd nd nd APL 953 4/7/06 95 nd nd nd APL 954 4/7/06 100 nd nd nd APL 955 4/7/06 81 nd nd nd Method Detection Limits :20 40 "nd" Indicates not detected at the listed detection limits. "int" Indicates that interference prevents determination. ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR SURROGATE : 65% TO 1.35% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Matthew Sebonia • ern. H. urn ..retw're +4.1• . ,, 4..0.101.4.741.4.1.101.411AWS.0.2. 1 Attachment 2 Selected Ground -Water Quality Data From Previous Reports OUND NVIRO IM NTAL TRAT[GIES www.soundenvironmental.com Table 4 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - Dissolved Metals NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Sample Location Sample Date Arsenic Barium. Cadmium Chromium •`Lead- ' Mercury Selenium Silver Zinc GP -01 .1/19/2007 <1 2.65 <1 4.49 1.91 <0.2 <1 <1jI <10 GP -03 1/19/2007 5.67 16.9 <1 1.54 3.24 <0.2 <1 <1jI 17.8 GP -04 1/19/2007 1.98 3.80 <1 2.10 4.64 <0.2 <1 <111 <1jI 13.0 <10 MW -01 1/19/2007 7.22 12.6 <1 1.53 <1 <0.2 <1 MW -02 1/19/2007 3.64 11.7 <1 3.02 <1 <0.2 4.48 <1jI <10 MW -04 1/19/2007 24.0 16.6 <10 <10 <10 <0.2 <10 <10jI 20.5 MTCA Method.A:Cleanup Level for Groundwater' 5 NE 5 50 15 2 NE NE NE Surface Water ARAR, 40 CFR 1312 • 190 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NOTES: Concentrations presented in.tg /L. Results in t3OLD denote concentrations are above MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels. Analyzed by EPA Method 200.8. 1MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173 - 340 -900, Table 720 -1, Method A Cleanup Levels for Groundwater. 2Surface water ARAR reported for Arsenic is 190 µg /L (Acute /Freshwater from CLARC, February 2007). cnccc r, IPPFNT PROJECTS W1563-001-01 NW Auto Wrecking \Tables \Groundwater Tables/GW - Metals < = analyte not detected above method detection limit ARAR = Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements CFR = Code of Federal Regulations EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency j = The internal standard Is out of control limits; reported value is an estimate. MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act NA = not applicable NE = cleanup level not established pg/L = micrograms per liter 1 of 1 OUND NVIRONMNTAL TRATEGI {S www.soundenvironmental.com Table 5 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - Petroleum Hydrocarbons NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukw Ia, Washington Sample • Location Sample Date Benzene Ethylbenzenel Toluenes • •_ ,..- . ; : .Xylenesl- --- .`` r= GRPH2' DRPH3 ORPH3 GP -01 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <3 <100 <71 <360 GP -03 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <3 <100 140 <270 GP -04 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <3 <100 <54 <270 MW -01 1/19/2007 -- -- -- — 540 330 <280 MW -02 1/19/2007 — -- -- — <100 84 <280 MW -04 1/19/2007 -- -- — -- <100 770 500 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Groundwater4 5 700 1,000 1,000 800 500 500 NOTES: Results in Ng /L. Results in BOLD denote concentrations above MTCA Method A Cleanup Level. 'Analyzed by EPA Method 8021B. 2Analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH -Gx. 'Analyzed by Northwest Method NWTPH -Dx. 4MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173 -340 -900, Table 720 -1, Method A Cleanup Levels for Groundwater. F: \SES CURRENT PROJECTS\0563001.01 NW Auto Wrecking \Tables\Groundwater TeblesIGW - Petro HCs < = analyte not detected above method detection limit — = not analyzed pg /L = micrograms per liter DRPH = diesel -range petroleum hydrocarbons GRPH = gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons MTCA = Model Toxics Control Act ORPH = oll -range petroleum hydrocarbons 1 of 1 OUND NVIRONMENIAL TRMEGIES Table 6 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230-E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Sample Location Sample Date 1,1- DIchloroethane 1,1- DIchloroethane 1,1- Dlchloropropene 1,1,1- TrlchIoroethane 1,1,2 -TrIch loroeth ane e o3 ..F.. o u e m O O u "- 1,2, -0Ibromo3- chloropropane 1,2- D1bromochloroethane (EDB) 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 1,2- DIchloroethane (EDC) 1,2- DIchlorpropane 1 ,2,3- Trlchlorobenze n e 1 ,2,3 -TrIch I oropropan e 1 ,2,4TrIchlorobenze n e 0 c e m A $ E C of 1,3- Dlchlorobenzene 1,3- Dlchloropropane 1,3,5- Trlmethylbenzene MW -01 1119/2007 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 . 1.8 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1_- <1 MW -02 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 MW-04 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <l <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Groundwater' NE NE NE 200 NE NE NE NE NE NE . 5 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE N(.33/1. Results in pg1L. Analyzed by EPA Method 200.8. 'MTCA Cleanup Regulation 173 -310 -900, Table 720 -1. Method A Cleanup Levels 1or Groundwater. • 515;..nnE,0eC.ECY5 tot/ a U� 'w.,.c .gT,me1GrO. fh,ter r,Wea <= analyte not defected above method detection tirtdt Y9M1 = micrograms Per liter EPA = U.S. Environmental ProteChon Agency MTCA = Model Toms Control Act NE = cleanup level not established VOCs = volatile organic compounds 1o13 k OUND NVIRONMENIAL 4 1RAMEGIES www.soundenvironmental.com Table 6 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Sample Location Sample Date 1,4- Oichlorobenzene 2- Butanone (MEK) 2- Chlorotoluene 0 0 K xm A 2,2- DIchloropropane 4Chlorotoluene 14Methyl- 2- pentanone Acetone Benzene Bromobenzene Bromodlchloromethane FC 4 E 2 m Carboh Tetrachloride 0 c O o t u Chloroethane Chloroethane O o u c Is -1, 2 -DIchl oroethe ne cis-1 , 3 -D I c h to r o p r o p a n e MW -01 MW -02 1119/2007 <1 <10 <1 <10 <1 <1 <10 <10 7.4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1/19/2007 <1 <10 <1 <10 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1._ <1 MW -04 . 1/19/2007 <1 <10 <1 <10 <1 <1 <10 <10 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Groundwater' NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 5 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE E 5E5 :URHENT ngo,E.,5 0543 CI.`• •m •..lo new.. ea.. Ge ....air T.y.a. 2 of 3 OUND NVIRONMENTAL (RMEGIES sww.soundenvironmental.com Table 6 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - VOCs NW Auto Wrecking Site 10230 E. Marginal Way South Tukwila, Washington Sample Location Sample Date Ol bromochl oromethan e Dlbromomethane DIch olordifl uorometh an e e c N C a $ w Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene Methylene chiorlde n- Propylbenzene Naphthalene p- Isopropyltoluene sec- Butylbenzene Styrene tart- Butylbenzene Tetrachloroethene c m trans- 1,2- DIchloroth ene trans- 1,3- DIchioropropene Trtchloroethene Trlchlorofl u oromethane u -a o u c > Xylenes • MW -01 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 25 <1 6.4 <5 7.7 8.8 <1 1.8 <1 <1 <1 1.0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 3.6 <3 <3 MW -02 MW -04 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1/19/2007 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level for Groundwater' NE NE NE 700 NE NE 5 NE 160 NE NE NE NE 5 1,000 NE NE NE NE 0.2 NE , sES..AAEM''OO.ECTSVal %:'•:.•,v. au. Vor.r.n -acs, 0••sr•e -nn iarm 3 of 3 • 1F0/17/20% 16:38 2539222835 ARP SPECTRA Laboratories 2221 Ross Way • Tacoma, WA 98421 • (253) 2724550 • Fax (253)572-9818. PAGE 018 /10 • 09/09/1005 Marsh intlUstrial Research 1205 Farallooe Tacoma, WA 95466 Attu: Dan Marsb Anoire ntvcnic 9srit rn Cad/nn m Cht iniuin Dissolve4 Barium Dissolved Cxdaniura Diraolvcd Ctubmiaini Bii7olved Selenium Disaolve4 Silver Stleniur Silver Dissolved Arsenic by GEAA Dissolved Lead by GFAA Diya»Jved Mcrcury Mercury Result- Units M ethod < 2 uhf L EPA 200.7 44 u!{/t. 12PA 200.7 < 3 rapt EPA 2ll.7 640 ueL EPA 200.7 8 uay. EPA 200.7 < 3 ,B. L E7'A 200.7 < 7 vg11. EPA 200.7 < 50 tmfl.. 'A 200,7 <7 util, EPA 2Cc.? 20 ug1L EPA 200.7 < 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 < 7 ugj1. EPA 200.7 < 2 i3 _ EPA 20.2 <2 1 ur/L EPA 219..2 0.2 ug/L EPA 244.1 <0.2 utt EPA 245,1 SPECTRA LABORATOP.].ES Steve Hibbs, Laboratory Manavcr e 160551 I3E9 'u0 1'1 P "9I '13!1.1:9! 5007E d -IS (!,u,d) Project: NW Auto Client 3D: Well 1 Sample Matrix: Water Date Sampled; 08/29/2005 Date Received: 08/3W2005 Spcctza Project: 2005080441 Spcatra Number..1 Aaaatyte_ Res'.tlt Units Method /Rye 1 ors ON d • 10/17/2e05. 16133 2539222035 ARP PAGE 05/ii3 ii\ SPECTRA Laboratories 2221 Ross Way • Tacoma. WA98421 • (253) 272 -4850 • Fax (253) 572 -9A38 09/09/2005 Mush industrial Research 1205 Farnllonc Tacoma, WA 98466 Arcs Dan Marsh Analyze Result Units Method Arradc 5 520. EPA 200.7 Eh:juin 99 usiL. EPA 200.7 Cadmium < 3 ug/L EPA 208.7 Cheomitam 20 ug/L EPA 200.7 Diecolved Sedum 6 me EPA 200.7 Dissolved CAdmhunt < 3 aalt. EPA 200.7 Disaalved Chromium < 7 u 5L EPA 200.7 pissolved Selenium < 50 ug/L EPA 200.7 VicatOved Silver < 7 %ISM EPA 200.7 Lead 39 cg/1, EPA 200 7 Selenium < 50 uglt. EPA 20$.7 Silva < 7 ug/L EPA 200.7 D'+sseiV ed A.«'lc by CF_P_A < 2 • uel.. EPA 20V. DissolQed Lead by L'FAA < 2 ; ug/L ErA 239.2 DiitaeIved M emer <0.2 ug/L CPA 2e5.1 Mercury <0.2 ug/L EPA 245,1 F:oji c , NW Auto Client ID: • Well 2 Sa nple Mat x: Water Date Sampled: 08/29/2005 Date 9tcciveci: 08/330/2005 Spectra .Project: 200508Q441 Spectra Number:2 A_slyte Result Units Metlwod SPECTRA LADORA f ORIES Steinpsi.I.1 o:y Manager . Z d. 1300 /9Z"•9 ON//hit iS / /.0.9t ;00Z '; d3S(10 P3sc 2 ci 5 • NH 10/17/2006 15:38 2539222036 ARP SPECTR.A Laboratories PAGE 10/10 2221 Rocs Way • Tacoma, WA 98A2: (25'3)172-4850 ' • Fax (253'072-983a 09/n9/?O05 Marsh Industrial Rcstatch 1205 Faallonc Tacoma, WA 98466 Attu: Dan Marsh A,nsiyte Arsenic Barium Cat: nhtr.n Chromium Dianetvr d Fariurrr Dim-Aved Cadmium ,Dissolved C romium Dissolved Selenium Div:Div_'d Silver Lead Selenium Silver Dissolved ArFe 1C by C►fl-4 Dis::lveti Lead ky'3tAA Dissolved &tartary Mercury Dices) 011 `�rtlint Benzene Ethylben -;r e • The reporting limits Rcwlt Units <2 awl. gS us/1. <3 unit 17 egg. 9 ug1L < 3 vg/1.. <7 uw1 30 ug/L <7 vg 35 ug/x. < 50 eg /L < 7 og/L <2 u /L <2 us/i.. <0,2 =W. <0.6 me. <200' ug/t <1000` <S0 o <1 uJJL <1 vgit Method EPA 200.7 E 'A 200.7 EPA 200.7 n?A 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7 EPA 200.', EPA 200.1 1 200,7 EPA 700,7 EPA 206.2 0PA 239.2 EPA 245.1 EPA 245.1 NW xPPI•D flvreti -D NW PH.G SW846 826093 SW8468 0a~ Project: NW Auto Client ID: Well 3 Sample Matrix: water Date Sampled: 0x129.» 005 Dale Received: 08/11)/M4 Spectra Project: 2005080441 Spectra Nu Cher :3 Analvte lei tlyken-Bury! Ether Toluton Ti zsa1 Xylenea Art elwitcd due to limited nampta yule rsa. RfCTGT 7cs xaa.0 1.ikerlD111.10iEICarCK .•rim►^ >� for td LO SPECTRA LABORATORIES Steve 1.1ibbs, Leboratgry Manager d l,.r,651 M9 '0N!/0:91 '1S /8 :91 SAS' 6 d3S (, 8:1) Reault Units 1 <I uteL <2 :ajL Page 3 cl 5 tthod SWS46 82609 SW846 8260B SW846 42508 17/17/20x6 16:38 2539222036 ARP PAGE 0E /10 SPECTRA Laboratories ______] 2221 Ross Way • Titan-n , WA 98421 • (253) 272 -4850 • Fax (253) 572 -9638 09/0912005 Marab l =n use; ieI Rcsc ch 1205 Familone . T ncoma, WA 98456 Attn: Den Marna Project: NW Aura Client ID: Well 4 Sample Wlamx; Water Date Sampled: 08/29/2005 Date Received: 08/30/2405 Spa Pact: 2005080441 Spectra Number:4 Ar►a1 ' , R suit Units Method b.11,2 c Arscnle 3 u /L EPA 200.7 76 ug/L EPA 200.7 8oiu*a EPA 200.7 Cadmium < 1 i,gtl Cb'omiuM 11 ug/L EPA 200.7 Disaalyeci $Arivel 7 ug t EPA 200.7 43 ug/L EPA 10.1 rJiAB01Ye6 Cadmium EPA '200.7 Llissolves! C1�mrnium < 7 ' a$!L Dissolved Selenium < 50 ug/L CPA 200.7 <7 41. EPA2.04.7 fliA50IuCt1 Silver EPA 200.7 Lend B6 ug/L < 0 ueL EPA 200.7 Seleri{Eu'- EPA 2D0.7 Silver < 7 ug/l. R 2 ' ug/L EPA 206.2 L'i5oo1Y� ..°u'S�.i: by t Fh.r � Dinolved Leal by t3FAA < 1 net. EPA 239.2 piapolvcd Mctntry. X0,2 uf EPA 245.1 Mercury c0 2 ug/L. EPA 245.1 SPECTRA LABCRATOR1.E$ Steve Hibbs; Laboratory Manager • tSCIRS/ 97f9 'HID 9 t 'IS /91':91 ;COZ 5 6'; OM Result Units Method P2go 4 of 5 ViCMJ 10/17/2006 15:33 2539222036 ARP SPECTRA Laboratories 2221 Ross Way * Tacoma. WA 042t • (7`•3) 272.4RS1) * Fax (253) 572 -9R3t( PAGE 07/10 09/09/2005 Marsh Industrial Rtscarrsh 1205 Farallotte TACOMA, WA 98466 At n: Dart Marsh An�sly *.e Argcnie Barium C1rdm ium Chromi_! Dissolved Barium Dissolved CgdMiann Dionoly 4 Chromium eiesOav-:a Selenium Dipsotvcd Silver Lead Selenium Sitar Dissolved Arsenic by OVA A < 2 ug11. EPA 206.2 Dissolved Lead by QFAA <2 erg EPA 234.2 Di SAO Ived Mercury <0.2 net. F.BA 245.1 Merz'ury •4,2 t?o. EPA 245 1 Result Units Method < 2 ug/L EPA 200.7 100 u4,1.. EPA 200.7 <3 ug/L EPA 200.7 g us/1... EPA 200.7 $ ug/L EPA 200.7 < 3 ug/L EPA 200.7 < 7 ug1L EPA 200.7 < SO ag2 EPA 709.7 <7 ueL EPA 20117 140 uel.. EPl! 200.7 < 50 ueL EPA 200.7 < 7 ug/L EPA 200 .7 SPECTRA LABORATORIES Stcvc Lab ratory ilIarsager 6 1.9 69'34 417'9t'1S /10.91 5002 F, Project: NW cA u_to Client ID: Well 5 San;nlo Matrix: Water Date Sampled: 08/29/2005 Cate Received': 08/30/2005 Spectra Project; 2005080441 Spectra Number: 5 Anslvta Recall Units Method Pegs 5 of 5 0d. d ?ji TABLE 2 • SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL DATA • MONITORING WELL BORINGS NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING FACILITY SEATILE, WASHINGTON : -............... es: • ns•a . .,... .... . . . EPA Method 8020 !Ana.lirte .. ....: . • ••• dbY. c(.31065f.... °.:...... ..... . .: .• ..... .. ije ......„.. , , 'Anc!/Yz.c.''. :2.Y.•••:_•• ii (hod YV:T.F.1-9' ...::...:....-.............,..... ' .-....:::::.... Y..... (iiJo.e.0x.i.m....... -::.-....,......... font • ...:thr;gr::;:•.1n.r„°:.'6:Ii°T..- '.:n:..in.....:•..g.... i •,••••:;•ciiiippp4 .... .... Measu . .... . , . . . .. e" . . ' :. .nitc)(ing.W. . ......''.......:..... ri 'e ' Eleva 1 ...: ... • - . . 'ter'rae"e.sured....t„:.,...... calibrated .......... , 'tolsobuty o.n.o... .... .:... . .. a as.u: re d... relative . 1 ..8.. e 1.n„g used ....ii6,.........:....1..........,:••'dt0'..".t1.1.:*.s....'...,.:':cP.....,,...ic).....,,,...,:•b....•:::,:•.;.••••••••,:11:::;.:...'...b.....:.',...6....,:.."................................................ n. • ° 4t.1 e:d •isi:e1V.:6';t:••i:efl.' :?.....i.:961..66-f.e.. 6.. t. . . a drop hose • ' procedures • ,aro ... .... ...... . : . .... .. . . .: • . :, • • • •.::::::....:. '..• ..' '.'• ....... :...• :... ... : • • , .. ......),....-. ..' .:. ::.: '•.' .... .. . „....— .... • ... •••• • .. .. „ . .. ..., . .. . ... • :. ' -: • ••• cj.WTO/Atb.6)4ep......d;.2 :..• ,.. ....• lq(crifiz'od,'h.y•Ecology ........ ...... .. . ......., .... . .......,:..... ...:... ... . .. '. . by ..• : .. .. - • • • li:t. iitt.;1.11.' ti carbon ... . . .. . - • • .... . .. . ItIla.'1&9. P.... .,..:...:.. i - :::: k• I ••••••■/. (11...iii sr...i1.16.;:b!'-q.n. 9f-,0.0?1.1.1?!..'..die.6i. • - . cht°711! .. . ...I- 1.1:1()%d. s'''.. tOgiap.)y. me:. . ..;. • - and•heavY.c;i1,trigje h)i...drci.o.rt.,::f:or.t.s..... . .. ..... . es....are•cil.0..t.11)..c.g..,Y,......q....,.a...,..1..1f.le,..0;!...lsi.0...:•!..i.O.;....f., 1 • :".'..;',..... ": -.i....:•., . -.....• . „•••• .. • • - ••• ' P. p'.rn .. '' -...r:p.ai-iS per .i11111.i.orj•••••• .. .,. . .' . .'.i.:'..2....:.*::.. ' ''' ..... .. ..-::.."'n. s...'....' 11t1i. ;.. JO/V--:-'"illic-r°.•ul!' 'li'per .: ',' •:.....:'.....„ ' . ri'gil •rnliTig. ' . '.. ''../artia•pk'llti...,i'::.:-........ r .'-': • •••.:,....,„ .. . .... •• ... %-..• ' ''•• • , .. • .. ... ..... ..not le stpd ...... • I:. .. - • . . . .6ter..h4n:.,..,K,rrp_A.............:e..,1.11",.0,,.,....:',...'!":...9....*:::4.:'•:::...iciin,.. '-'''' ..'''''• .'..'.. ....1•• -eiceniralier.l.s.9.FC!„.,......"::..:-......::-,-.••••••••••••'..,' • ' ...' . - -.I. 's'Indlca.. PO... .:. .. ....... . 0 esi: Inc . Chh...det!ii...61.°6.::if.a:1n::.i.Y.".6...i.:;.0..0...;-1.6%.ttrie..e't-i' ..b.i:Anit(yt.lOi;ITephnol gi, . ". - • eVii).g. O :.koiiton;Mas ir)g... Document 11): 3313902T2.WKI Depth to Ground Water Photo ionizable Vapor Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds3 Gasoline- range Diesel- range Heavy Oil-range Dissolved nitoring . Date Water2 Elevation2 . Concentrations3 (uO) Hydrocarbons5 Hydrocarbons8 Hydrocartons6 Lead7 Nell' Sampled (feet) . (feet) •Pali B E T X (mg/I) (mg/i) (rngili (m9/1) MW-1 01/08/96 2.20 94.84 2,0 <0.50 <0.50 <050 <0.50 0.12 0.59 <0.71 <0.003 MW-2 01/08/96 , 2.44 95.19 785 '.. '..1.803. ... ,. '3 . , 100 .......... , 14,00 . '.... 0.80 0.0047 MW-3 01/08/96 2.07 95.06 12 8.7 <0.50 0.71 0.50 16 11 . . <0.003 tA Method A Cleanu. Level 5.0 30.0 40,0 20.0 1.08 .......* 0.005 : -............... es: • ns•a . .,... .... . . . EPA Method 8020 !Ana.lirte .. ....: . • ••• dbY. c(.31065f.... °.:...... ..... . .: .• ..... .. ije ......„.. , , 'Anc!/Yz.c.''. :2.Y.•••:_•• ii (hod YV:T.F.1-9' ...::...:....-.............,..... ' .-....:::::.... Y..... (iiJo.e.0x.i.m....... -::.-....,......... font • ...:thr;gr::;:•.1n.r„°:.'6:Ii°T..- '.:n:..in.....:•..g.... i •,••••:;•ciiiippp4 .... .... Measu . .... . , . . . .. e" . . ' :. .nitc)(ing.W. . ......''.......:..... ri 'e ' Eleva 1 ...: ... • - . . 'ter'rae"e.sured....t„:.,...... calibrated .......... , 'tolsobuty o.n.o... .... .:... . .. a as.u: re d... relative . 1 ..8.. e 1.n„g used ....ii6,.........:....1..........,:••'dt0'..".t1.1.:*.s....'...,.:':cP.....,,...ic).....,,,...,:•b....•:::,:•.;.••••••••,:11:::;.:...'...b.....:.',...6....,:.."................................................ n. • ° 4t.1 e:d •isi:e1V.:6';t:••i:efl.' :?.....i.:961..66-f.e.. 6.. t. . . a drop hose • ' procedures • ,aro ... .... ...... . : . .... .. . . .: • . :, • • • •.::::::....:. '..• ..' '.'• ....... :...• :... ... : • • , .. ......),....-. ..' .:. ::.: '•.' .... .. . „....— .... • ... •••• • .. .. „ . .. ..., . .. . ... • :. ' -: • ••• cj.WTO/Atb.6)4ep......d;.2 :..• ,.. ....• lq(crifiz'od,'h.y•Ecology ........ ...... .. . ......., .... . .......,:..... ...:... ... . .. '. . by ..• : .. .. - • • • li:t. iitt.;1.11.' ti carbon ... . . .. . - • • .... . .. . ItIla.'1&9. P.... .,..:...:.. i - :::: k• I ••••••■/. (11...iii sr...i1.16.;:b!'-q.n. 9f-,0.0?1.1.1?!..'..die.6i. • - . cht°711! .. . ...I- 1.1:1()%d. s'''.. tOgiap.)y. me:. . ..;. • - and•heavY.c;i1,trigje h)i...drci.o.rt.,::f:or.t.s..... . .. ..... . es....are•cil.0..t.11)..c.g..,Y,......q....,.a...,..1..1f.le,..0;!...lsi.0...:•!..i.O.;....f., 1 • :".'..;',..... ": -.i....:•., . -.....• . „•••• .. • • - ••• ' P. p'.rn .. '' -...r:p.ai-iS per .i11111.i.orj•••••• .. .,. . .' . .'.i.:'..2....:.*::.. ' ''' ..... .. ..-::.."'n. s...'....' 11t1i. ;.. JO/V--:-'"illic-r°.•ul!' 'li'per .: ',' •:.....:'.....„ ' . ri'gil •rnliTig. ' . '.. ''../artia•pk'llti...,i'::.:-........ r .'-': • •••.:,....,„ .. . .... •• ... %-..• ' ''•• • , .. • .. ... ..... ..not le stpd ...... • I:. .. - • . . . .6ter..h4n:.,..,K,rrp_A.............:e..,1.11",.0,,.,....:',...'!":...9....*:::4.:'•:::...iciin,.. '-'''' ..'''''• .'..'.. ....1•• -eiceniralier.l.s.9.FC!„.,......"::..:-......::-,-.••••••••••••'..,' • ' ...' . - -.I. 's'Indlca.. PO... .:. .. ....... . 0 esi: Inc . Chh...det!ii...61.°6.::if.a:1n::.i.Y.".6...i.:;.0..0...;-1.6%.ttrie..e't-i' ..b.i:Anit(yt.lOi;ITephnol gi, . ". - • eVii).g. O :.koiiton;Mas ir)g... Document 11): 3313902T2.WKI ESN NORTHWEST CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NW AUTO PROJECT Washington Marsh Industrial Research Analyses of Diesel & Oil (NWTPH -Dx/Dx Extended) in Water Sample Date Surrogate Diesel Oil .Mineral Oil Number Analyied Recovery ( %) (ugl1.) .(ugl1:.) (fig/1.) Method Blank 4/7/06 126 nd nd nd APL 951 4/7/06 100 nd nd nd APL 952 4/7/06 126 nd nd nd APL 953 4/7/06 131 nd nd nd APL 954 4/7/06 79 nd nd nd APL 955 4/7/06 96 nd nd nd APL 955 Dup, 4/7/06 79 nd nd rid Method Detection Limits 200 400 400 "nd" Indicates not detected at the listed detection limits. "int" Indicates that interference prevents determination.- ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR SURROGATE : 65% TO 135% ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Matthew Sebonia ESN NORTHWEST CHEMISTRY LABORATORY NW AUTO PROJECT Washington Marsh Industrial Research Analyses of Gasoline (NWTPH -Gx) & BTEX (EPA Method 8021B) in Water Sample. Date . Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Gasoline Surrogate Number Analyzed (ug /1) (ug /1) (ttg /1) (ug /l).: (ug /I)'. Recovery .(To) Method Blank 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 93 LCS 419/06 107% 107% 109% 104% - -- 72 APL 951 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 95 APL 952 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd . 70 APL 953 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 132 APL 954 4/9/06 nd nd nd 5.3 310 72 APL 955 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 102 APL955 Dup. 4/9/06 nd nd nd nd nd 81 Method Detection Limits "nd" Indicates not detected at the listed detection limits. "int" Indicates that interference prevents. determination. ACCEPTABLE RECOVERY LIMITS FOR SURROGATE (Chlorobenzene) & LCS: 65% TO 1359 ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: Matthew Sebonia n SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE n ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT NW AUTO WRECKING SEATTLE, WA JULY 24. 2007 RECEIVED !DEC 21 2007 DalCOMl�4�IN17 a• or ailijir . _ Inn■%A/ AIIPVCDC11■ • +A i; • SFATTLE. WA 98119 • (206) 285.3373 FAX (206) 285.3927 • www.areusoacific.com • PROJECT TITLE: PREPARED FOR: INSPECTION CONDUCTED BY: PROJECT NUMBER: INSPECTION PERSONNEL: INSPECTION DATES: REPORT PREPARED BY: REPORT REVIEWED By: • NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report 10230 East Marginal Way Seattle, WA Marcelo Garces Sabey Construction REC ry o DEC 2 7'71 CoNrr„L, D ELONz_ 'Shannon Argus Pacific, Inc. 1900 W. Nickerson Street, Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 4503.07 Shannon MacKay EPA AHERA- Certified Building Inspector Number 1025596 (exp. Feb. 13, 2008) July 17, 2007 MacKay EPA AHERA- Certifi" d Building Inspector Number 1025596 Expires 02/13/2008 Argus Pacific, Inc. Neil Callahan - Project Manager Argus Pacific, Inc. REPORT ISSUE DATE: July 24, 2007 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2.1 NW AUTO WRECKING DESCRIPTION 2.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 3.0 INSPECTION RESULTS 4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING 5.0 MERCURY AND PCB INVENTORY 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7.0 LIMITATIONS TABLES TABLE 1 . RESULTS OF ASBESTOS INSPECTION TABLE 2, RESULTS OF LEAD PAINT SAMPLING TABLE 3, RESULTS OF PCB AND MERCURY INVENTORY FIGURES 1 2 3 4 4 5 FIGURE 1 . SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN, MAIN FLOOR AND 2ND STORIES FIGURE 2, SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN, ROOF APPENDICES APPENDIX A. ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS APPENDIX B. INSPECTION METHODOLOGY APPENDIX C. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS APPENDIX D. INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS Page iii • • ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT NW AUTO WRECKING SEATTLE, WA 1.0 INTRODUCTION This asbestos inspection report presents the results of the demolition level inspection for asbestos - containing materials (ACMs) performed by Argus Pacific, Inc. at the NW Auto Wrecking site located 10230 E Marginal Way, Seattle, WA. The purpose of the inspection was to locate, identify, and quantify ACM and assumed ACM prior to demolition activities in order to fulfill the requirements of a Good Faith Inspection in accordance with WAC 296 -62, and to comply with PSCAA Regulation III, Article 4. This inspection was conducted at the request of Marcelo Garces of Sabey Construction. As instructed by Marcelo Garces of Sabey Construction, the Scope of Work for this survey included the NW Auto Wrecking office building and adjacent shed and four additional sheds located at the site. The following summarizes the results of Argus Pacific's inspection for this project. Results are based on field observations and analytical results of the samples collected during the field inspection. Confirmed ACM included: • Multiple exterior caulking materials on the corrugated tin siding of the office building • Roofing material beneath corrugated fiberglass roof on the office building roof • Fibrous asphaltic penetration mastic on the office building roof • Thick window putties on the shed adjacent to the office building • 12" paisley patterned vinyl floor tile in the office in the shed adjacent to the office building In addition, the following materials were assumed to contain asbestos, but were not sampled because the inspector determined them to be ACM, for the safety of the inspector, and to preserve building system integrity. Assumed ACM included: • Electrical panels • Fire Doors 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2.1 NW AUTO WRECKING ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT DESCRIPTION The project site is located 10260 E Marginal Way, Seattle, WA. Five structures were included as part of this inspection. NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report 4464.07 Argus Pacific, Inc. Page 1 of 17 7/23/07 The NW Auto Wrecking office building is a single story building with a crawlspace and a sloped attic space. The roof is corrugated fiberglass over asphaltic roofing. The exterior walls consist of corrugated tin siding, wood paneling and natural brick. The interior wall consists of wood wall paneling over gypsum wallboard. The interior floor consists entirely of cement with a thick paint coating. The ceilings are 2'x4' suspended ceiling tiles. An auto shed is connected to the office building by a wood wall. The auto shed is a warehouse type building with exterior wood siding and a corrugated fiberglass roof. The interior consists of cement slab flooring, a small office and a small storage room. The storage room has a raised wood floor. The auto parts shed is north of the office building. The exterior of the shed consists of corrugated aluminum and fiberglass siding. The interior consists of wood paneling and cement slab flooring. It is a warehouse type building with one open room on the north end. Shed 1 is an open structure with one wall, it is located at approximately the center of the site. Shed 1 one consists of metal poles, wood trim and a corrugated metal roof. Shed 2 is an open structure with no wall on one side. One wall is adjacent to the lot on the South side of the site. It is rectangular with wood sectional poles running the length of the interior. The structure consists of wood and corrugated fiberglass roofing. Shed 3 is an open structure with one wall. It is the eastern-most structure on site. Shed 3 consists of metal poles, wood wall and trim and corrugated fiberglass roofing. 2.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS The inspection was conducted to provide information on the presence, location, and quantity of ACM for worker and environmental protection during upcoming demolition activities at the NW Auto Wrecking. If suspect ACM's are encountered during future demolition activities that are not addressed in this report, they must be treated as ACM until sampled by an AHERA - certified building inspector and shown not to contain asbestos. 3.0 INSPECTION RESULTS Argus Pacific conducted the field inspection in June of 2007 by the following Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) - certified building inspector: Shannon MacKay, Certification 1025596 Exp. 02/13/2008. Over the course of the field inspection, the Argus Pacific inspector collected twenty -six (26) samples of materials identified as suspect ACM. Eight (8) samples were found to contain asbestos. Two (2) materials were assumed to contain asbestos but were not sampled because the inspector determined them to be ACM, for the safety of the inspector, or to preserve building system integrity. NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report 4464.07 Argus Pacific, Inc. Page 2 of 17 7/23/07 3.1 RESULTS FOR THE NW Table 1 provides a complete list sample results for the NW Auto the following materials were co • Exterior caulking • Roofing material • Roof penetration mastic • Window putty • Vinyl floor tile • Electrical panels • Fire doors AUTO WRECKING of suspect ACM material descriptions, sample locations, and Wrecking. Based on the field inspection and laboratory analysis, nfirmed or assumed to be ACM: The following materials were not sampled because the Argus Pacific inspector deemed them visually negative for asbestos: • Fiberglass • Foam • Metal • Rubber • Wood 4.0 LEAD BASED PAINT SAMPLING Detectable concentrations of lead were found in all 11 of 15 paints sampled. A list of lead -based paints including sample locations and sample results is included in Table 2. Laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix C and field drawings with sample locations are included in Table 1. Worker protection requirements apply to all construction activities that may disturb lead -based paints. Employers are required to protect their employees from occupational exposures to lead in accordance with WAC 296 - 155 -179. Building demolition waste and debris is required to be characterized before it can be accepted by a landfill. The characterization of waste streams known to contain lead is determined using the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Process (TCLP), which determines the leaching potential of lead in the construction debris. A material "fails" the TCLP when there is greater than 5.0 parts per million (ppm) lead in the leachate. A TCLP sample is required prior to the start of demolition activities. NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report Page 3 of 17 4464.07 Argus Pacific, Inc. 7/23/07 5.0 MERCURY AND PCB INVENTORY Fluorescent light tubes and fluorescent light fixtures were identified at the NW Auto Wrecking. An inventory of fluorescent light tubes and suspected PCB - containing ballasts in accessible building areas is included in Table 3. Fluorescent light tubes may contain mercury. Fluorescent light ballasts may contain PCB's. Employers must inform their employees of mercury and PCB hazards in accordance with WAC 296 -62 -054. A light ballast is considered PCB containing when the ballast label does not state "no PCB's ". Fluorescent light tubes and PCB - containing light ballasts must be removed and disposed of prior to building demolition as per 40 CFR 262, 40 CFR 265, and WAC 173 -303. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On July 17, 2007, Argus Pacific conducted a demolition -level inspection of the buildings at the NW Auto Wrecking, located in Seattle, WA and identified ACM and assumed ACM, as detailed in this report. If materials are encountered during future renovation or demolition activities that are not addressed in this report, they must be treated as ACM until sampled by an AHERA- certified building inspector and shown not to contain asbestos. Washington - certified asbestos abatement workers must abate confirmed and assumed ACM that may be impacted by renovation activities and/or prior to demolition activities. The asbestos - related work must be performed in compliance with Washington State worker protection and environmental protection regulations. See WAC 296 -62, 296 -65 and PSCAA Regulation III, Article 4 for additional information. 7.0 LIMITATIONS Asbestos inspections are non - comprehensive and subject to many limitations, including those presented below. Our assessment has considered risks pertaining to asbestos; however, this inspection is limited to only those locations sampled. This inspection was not designed to identify all potential concerns or to eliminate all risks associated with demolition, material removal, construction, or transferring of property title. Evaluation of other risks not specifically described in the Scope of Work have not been included; for example: structural integrity; engineering loads; electrical; mechanical; radon gas; slope stability; building settlement; and evaluation of toxic and hazardous substances in, or in contact with, soil and groundwater. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This asbestos inspection was performed in preparation for removal of asbestos - containing materials in accordance with State of Washington and PSCAA laws and regulations. NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report 4464.07 Argus Pacific, Inc. Page 4of17 7/23/07 Argus Pacific is not responsible for materials that are hidden from sight, materials hidden behind walls, materials that cannot be found with reasonable diligence, or materials that require destructive means to access. Materials that are suspected to exist in wall cavities and other hidden spaces are assumed to be asbestos - containing until these areas can be inspected by an AHERA - certified building inspector. Argus Pacific has performed the services set forth in the Scope of Work in accordance with generally accepted industrial hygiene practices in the same or similar localities, related to the nature of the work accomplished, at the time the services were performed. The hazardous building materials and conditions presented in this report represent those observed on the dates we conducted the asbestos inspection. This inspection is intended for the exclusive use of Sabey Construction for specific application to the referenced property. This inspection is not intended to replace construction or demolition plans, specifications, or bidding documents. This report is not meant to represent a legal opinion. NW Auto Wrecking Asbestos Inspection Report 4464.07 Argus Pacific, Inc. Page 5of17 7/23/07 TABLES TABLE 1 AG Truck Shop Asbestos Bulk Sample Data Table ND: No asbestos detected Bold Type: Asbestos containing material Chr: Chrysotile asbestos Table 1: 1 of 3 Sample'# 5c 794 ript on . a 4 ., �L.o. --..„ Lab,R`esul #s. , Quantities CT1 NWA- CT1 -01 2'x4' suspended ceiling tile with smooth surface East end of front lobby in office building ND CT2 NWA - CT2 -01 2'x4' suspended ceiling the with worm pattern SW corner of front lobby in office building L1:ND L2:ND CT3 NWA - CT3 -01 12 "x12" glued -on ceiling tile with brown mastic dots and worm pattern NE corner of office in office building L1:ND L2:ND CT4 NWA - CT4 -01 12 "X12" glued -on ceiling tile with brown mastic dots and random pinhole pattern S end of office in office building L1:ND L2:ND CA1 NWA- CA1 -01 Flexible white window caulking Exterior - Wood window frame on front of office building, W face ND CA2 NWA- CA2 -01 Brittle white caulking under gray flexible window caulking Exterior - Wood window frame on front of office building, W face L1:ND (gray soft material with paint) L2:2% Chr (beige putty material) 200 If (quantity includes all exterior caulkings, asbestos containing caulkings are typically beneath a non- asbestos containing gray caulking) GWB1 NWA- GWB1 -01 Nailed -on GWB behind wood wall paneling SW corner of front lobby in office building ND CA3 NWA - CA3 -01 White window caulking on interior of double door frame Exterior - W face, behind metal frame between frame and corrugated siding 4% Chr See CA2 CA4 NWA- CA4-01 Brittle beige caulking under gray flexible caulking between corrugated tin siding and natural brick Exterior - N end of front of office building, W face L1:ND (gray soft material with paint) L2:2% Chr (tan nutty materiall See CA2 CA5 NWA - CA5 -01 Gray caulking along corrugated metal siding Exterior - N face, along corrugated metal siding seams ND ND: No asbestos detected Bold Type: Asbestos containing material Chr: Chrysotile asbestos Table 1: 1 of 3 TABLE 1 AG Truck Shop Asbestos Bulk Sample Data Table � KAC ...�...._ w�_ ?' Say m e # ._..�.��.�_p.._. _ zg Descri �'tion d �:� _. �. -__� .�.: °�._ . ' . -�� '� � Location � � ; -�:.. Lab;�Results� l ��; Quantities r a RO1 NWA- R01-01 Roof sheeting with red pebbles under corrugated fiberglass roof Roofing - E end of roof, below corrugated roof, above office on office building L1:2% Chr (black asphaltic material) L2:ND (black asphaltic material with red nranulpc1 1800 sf RO5 NWA- RO5 -01 Asphaltic roof penetration mastic Roofing - E end of roof, below corrugated roof, above office on office building 3% Chr 3 ea (4 sf per penetration) EJ1 NWA- EJ1 -01 White brittle expanstion joint Middle of floor, front lobby of office L1:ND L2:ND PNT1 NWA- PNT1 -01 _building Silver paint patching on corrugated fiberglass roof N end of roof ND PNT2 NWA - PNT2 -01 Thick gray, blue and yellow coating on floor Middle of floor, front lobby of office building L1:ND L2:ND L3:ND VCB1 NWA- VCB1 -01 6" light gray vinyl cove base with white mastic NE corner of office in office building L1:ND L2:ND PNT3 NWA - PNT3 -01 Thick gray paint on front stoop - Exterior - W end of building, on raised concrete stoop L1:ND L2:ND EJ2 NWA - EJ2 -01 Asphaltic expansion joint between asphalt and foundation footer Exterior - N face of auto shed, at base ND VFS1 NWA- VFS1 -01 Asphaltic vinyl floor sheeting on built up wood floor Middle of flooring NW corner room in auto shed L1:ND L2:ND WPG1 NWA- WPG1 -01 Brittle tan window putty between metal window frame and glass Exterior window - N face of auto shed 3% Chr 3 ea (2'x3' window) WPG2 NWA - WPG2 -01 White brittle window putty between metal window frame and glass Exterior window - S face of auto shed 2% Chr 1 ea (5'x5' window) VFT1 NWA- VFT1 -01 12" vinyl floor tile with paisley pattern and yellow mastic SW corner of auto shed, in office L1:2% Chr (beige tile) L2:ND (tan brittle mastic) 108 sf ND: No asbestos detected Bold Type: Asbestos containing material Chr: Chrysotile asbestos Table 1: 2 of 3 TABLE 1 AG Truck Shop Asbestos Bulk Sample Data Table HMAT # xu,;a°°°' amples# 3;<:. .. "c^. p', „d.e'"` Description �M 'H,% N EN�y,,',.. i..".".,'''«"YyT 4 -.�:.. ..,•':°,z?s�!a'..a LabResults f...,za.TR, uC . ,,;r..r. Quant�tes: RO2 NWA- RO2 -01 Sheet roofing substrate with silver paint Roofing - W end of roof, auto parts she ND RO3 NWA- RO3 -01 Roll top flat roofing Roofing - W end of roof, auto parts shed L1:ND L2:ND PAP1 NWA- PAP1 -01 Asphaltic vapor barrier paper between exterior corruated metal siding and interior wood siding SE corner of auto parts shed ND CA6 NWA - CA6 -01 Soft caulking around exterior entrance Exterior - S face of auto parts shed ND FD1 N/A Fire door W end of front lobby in office building Assumed 1 ea EP1 N/A Electrical panels Throughout Assumed 8 ea ND: No asbestos detected Bold Type: Asbestos containing material Chr: Chrysotile asbestos Table 1: 3 of 3 TABLE 2 Lead Containing Paint Samples Gray on yellow on thick blue on white NWA- pb1 -01 NWA- pb2 -01 Gray on yellow NWA- pb3 -01 Gray on yellow on blue on Tight green NWA- pb4 -01 Turquoise on white on red NWA- pb5 -01 NWA- pb6 -01 Red Cream on Tight turquoise NWA- pb7 -01 Yellow on red NWA- pb8 -01 Turquoise on red on yellow NWA- pb9 -01 NWA- pb10 -01 Yellow Red on yellow NWA- pb11 -01 Gray on red NWA- pb12 -01 NWA- pb13 -01 Gray on turquoise Yellow on light green NWA- pb14 -01 NWA- pb15 -01 Gray Gray Cement Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood Metal Wood Metal Wood Wood Wood Metal Wood Wood Front lobby floor of office building Exterior office building, N side Exterior eaves of office building Window trim on W side of office building Window trim on E side of office building On wood column in auto parts shed On corragated metal siding, exterior auto parts shed On exterior wood trim of auto parts shed On metal column in shed 1 On wood trim on shed 1 Shed 2 Shed 2 column On metal column in shed 3 Shed 3 Interior of office building Bold Text: Paint is above the Reporting Limit for Lead Lab .Results'in; _'percents, <0 :0052 <0.0065 0.2100 6.6000 0.3200 <0.0130 5.4000 0.2100 4.3000 0.8900 0.1400 0.1800 7.9000 <0.0090 0.4700 Table 2 and 3: 1 of 2 TABLE 3 Fluorescent Light Fixture and Mercury Containing Light Inventory Description ;g Fluorescent light fixture: 20 ea 2 bulb x 1 ballast x 4' long Table 2 and 3: 2 of 2 FIGURES ARCUS SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE= PROJECT NAME NW AL4ro [boob PAnH SiARVEy SUBJECT AIPPRDIC1 MAT rre MAP CALCULATED BY PROJECT NO. i/5-63. 07- PAGE _J 7 OF At412. PARTS S►+av DATE CHECKED BY DATE SHED 2 c— EAST' N1aR4t/mitt i - ARGUS 19323 ARGUS b n av SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRW. HYGIENE PROJECT NAME NtN AtAri CjOot FAITH 51AgAte / PROJECT NO. 145o3• 04- SUBJECT �-� OFFICE 13 41t,D1n1q PAGE OF CALCULATED BY DATE O /1401— CHECKED BY DATE Mow EAST MA-ky /WAG "my tl�'1k- 0T1=:0 NW v i 1 1,N N tJ IA A • toLl bi t41'4 k- 1 33 FRONT try Irt2 1/'- KISHOM t4tAl Ni' t - <" —2* office (5x eAG • 2-) 12' Nv4A4 =411 NINA .b tN1,1WM4:57;; '5171 hlA -: ta,i. -� G f mbvx vc; t -► 1 uv+�: : rat ARGUS PACIFIC REV. 92000 ARGUS 19323 ARGUS n SAFETY • TANNING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE n PROJECT NAME NW AUTO G4D0D FAITH StAKVE�I PROJECT NO. e•� 85-03. 67— SUBJECT AI/LTn SHl;n PAGE 2 OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE D 1 iz'— 0F9FJCr JNgO!N9 AVID SHED --- 30a_. !�lUJA U P4.17i,-?0i ARGUS 19323 ARCUS SAFETY • TTWNING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE PROJECT NAME Nw AtAlb C�oDD Faun -t S+AgVO/ PROJECT NO `O� . O L/ SUBJECT AM TO PARTS S 1 r) PAGE OF CALCULATED BY DATE OVI VD (0 CHECKED BY DATE ARGUS 19:17.1 1 APPENDIX A ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS APPENDIX A. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS • AHERA Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act • Amended Water Water to which a detergent has been added to decrease the surface tension. This procedure minimizes the potential release of asbestos fibers, thereby reducing the potential health risk to the inspectors and building occupants. • Demolition -level Inspection An inspection that involves... • EPA Environmental Protection Agency. National government agency that... • HMATs Homogeneous materials, meaning materials uniform in type, texture, color, and date of installation. Size and pattern changes for materials, such as ceiling and floor tiles, may indicate that materials should not be considered homogeneous. • Inspector Training Certificate Certificate that proves an asbestos inspector has successfully completed the class... • Laboratory Accreditation Certificate Certificate that shows and laboratory... • Management -Level Inspection An inspection that involves... • Polarized Light Microscopy Method of analysis that involves... • PSCAA Puget Sound Clean Air Agency • Quality Control Sample Sample taken of... • Renovation -level Inspection An inspection that involves... • WAC Washington.... • APPENDIX B INSPECTION METHODOLOGY APPENDIX B. INSPECTION METHODOLOGY Argus Pacific's asbestos inspection was performed by AI -IERA- certified building inspectors following a modified sampling protocol in accordance with 40 CFR 763, the PSCAA Regulation III, Article 4, and the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries WAC 296 -62- 077021. Argus Pacific created site drawings during the course of the inspection. Argus Pacific conducted walk - through inspections of the project areas to identify visually negative materials and to assess the condition of suspect ACM prior to sampling. The Argus Pacific survey team followed work practice and engineering controls for asbestos sampling as specified for Class III asbestos work (29 CFR 1926.1101). This included using wet methods and nitrile gloves during sampling and using plastic barriers and drop cloths to isolate the operation. In addition, Argus Pacific employees wore half -face respirator with a P -100 particulate cartridge filter during sampling of suspect friable ACM. Respirators were not used during the visual inspection portion of the survey, while preparing to sample, and if sampling non - friable suspect ACM as long as the material did not become friable during sampling. Inspectors conducted a thorough visual inspection of accessible areas, including crawl spaces, pipe chases, air plenums, maintenance areas, furnace rooms, and roofs. During the inspection, the inspectors developed a list of homogeneous materials and record the list in field notes or on field forms. The surface of the material to be sampled was lightly .wetted with amended water prior to and during sample collection to reduce fiber release. Amended water is water to which a detergent has been added to decrease the surface tension. This procedure will minimize the generation of asbestos fibers, if any are present, reducing the potential health risk to the inspectors and building occupants. The inspector marked the sampling locations on the existing floor plans with a unique number corresponding to the sample number to identify the material from which the sample was collected. Existing floor plans were field - modified, as necessary, to reflect actual building characteristics noted in the field. Destructive sampling techniques were employed during the course of this survey. Sampled areas were repaired to the extent possible immediately following sample collection; however, it was not always possible to restore the area to its original color, appearance, or integrity. Materials uniform in type, texture, color, and date of installation are considered to be homogeneous materials (HMATs). Size and pattern changes for materials, such as ceiling and floor tiles, may indicate that materials should not be considered homogeneous. Materials were grouped into HMATs and assigned numbers. An HMAT# is an un- biased, non - repeating, consecutive number assigned by the inspector to numerically represent a specific HMAT. Unique sample numbers were generally developed as follows: Building Designation — HMAT# - HMAT SERIES# Example: AG- GWB1 =01 Each sample was collected and stored in a heavy -duty, self - sealing plastic bag and hand delivered to NVL Laboratories in Seattle, Washington. Samples were analyzed via polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with EPA 600/R- 93/116. Homogeneous areas of suspected lead -based coatings (paints) were identified and sampled in accessible areas throughout the interior and exterior of the WISC. Homogeneous painted surfaces were defined by substrate, color, and application. Paint chip samples were collected to the substrate to ensure that all layers present on the substrate were included in the laboratory analysis. Each sample was collected and stored in a heavy -duty, self - sealing plastic bag and delivered to NVL Laboratories, Inc. in Seattle, WA. Samples were analyzed via Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry in accordance with EPA SW 846, Method 7420. An inventory of fluorescent light tubes and potential PCB - containing ballasts was conducted during the inspection. Where fluorescent light fixtures could not be visually examined, the number of potential PCB - containing ballasts in fixture were estimated based on the following assumptions: • Each single light tube fluorescent fixture contains one ballast; • Each multiple light tube fluorescent fixture contains one ballast for every pair of light tubes. All light ballasts inventoried during this investigation were assumed to be PCB containing. All light ballasts on site must be removed and disposed of as PCB containing unless otherwise noted on the manufacturer's label. If a ballast is not labeled as no PCB's, it must be disposed of correctly (see Section 5.0). • APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS NVL Laboratories, Inc. awaL J 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 l By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Lab ID: 27072274 Client Sample #: NWA- CT1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Off -white compressed fibrous material with white paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Perlite Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 47% Glass fibers 5% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072275 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Layer 2 of 2 Client Sample #: NWA- CT2 -01 Description: Beige compressed fibrous material with white paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Fine particles, Paint, Perlite Description: Black asphaltic material Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder Cellulose 55% Glass fibers 5% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Cellulose 2% None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072276 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Layer 2 of 2 Client Sample #: NWA- CT3 -01 Description: Tan compressed fibrous material Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler Description: Brown brittle mastic Non - Fibrous Materials: Mastic /binder Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 98% Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072277 Location: NW Auto Client Sample #: NWA- CT4 -01 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0-3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Govemment. Page 1 of 8 r NVL Laboratories, Inc. aaf 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 www.nvllabs.com D ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Layer 1 of 2 Layer 2 of 2 Description: Tan compressed fibrous material with white paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Description: Brow n brittle mastic Non - Fibrous Materials: Mastic/binder 98% Other Fibrous Materials:% Talc fibers 2% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072278 Client Sample #: NWA- CA1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Off -white soft material with green paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072279 Client Sample #: NWA- CA2 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Gray soft material with paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Layer 2 of 2 Description: Beige putty material Non - Fibrous Materials: Calcareous particles, Binder /Filler Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 2% Lab ID: 27072280 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Off -white chalky material with paper Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Fine particles, Gypsum /binder Cellulose 10% Glass fibers 5% Client Sample #: NWA- GWB1 -01 Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the ,components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0 -3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 - 60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Govemment. Page 2 of 8 r NVL Laboratories, Inc. awaa.p #102063 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 • Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 B www.nvllabs.com ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis J By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Lab ID: 27072281 Client Sample #: NWA- CA3 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Beige putty material with red paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Calcareous particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Lab ID: 27072282 Client Sample #: NWA- CA4 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Gray soft material with paint Non- Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Description: Tan putty material Non - Fibrous Materials: Calcareous particles, Binder /Filler Layer 2 of 2 Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 4% Other Fibrous Materials:% None.Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 2% Lab ID: 27072283 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Gray soft material with red and yellow paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder /Filler, Paint None Detected ND Client Sample #: NWA- CA5 -01 Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072284 Client Sample #: NWA- RO1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Black asphaltic material Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder, Granules, Mica Layer 2 of 2 Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND with red granules Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 48% Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 2% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client DRAFT Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 � Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10 /0 =5 -15 /o, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government. Page 3 of 8 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 www. nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 J By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Lab ID: 27072285 Client Sample #: NWA- R05 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic material Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Asphalt/binder None Detected ND Chrysotile 3% Lab ID: 27072286 Client Sample #: NWA- EJ1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Off -white chalky material with gray paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Layer 2 of 2 Fine particles, Gypsum/binder, Paint Description: Clear soft adhesive Non - Fibrous Materials: Adhesive/binder None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072287 Client Sample #: NWA- PNT1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Silver paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Paint Cellulose 2% None Detected ND Wollastonite 1% Glass fibers 2% Lab ID: 27072288 Client Sample #: NWA- PNT2 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 3 Description: Yellow brittle material with paint Non- Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Mineral grains Paint Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0 -3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government. Page 4 of 8 4' NVL Laboratories, Inc. `irwacv #102063 4708 Aurora Ave. N.. Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 www.nvllabs.com D ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto By Polarized Light Microscopy Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26. Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Layer 2 of 3 Layer 3 of 3 Description: Blue brittle material Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Mineral grains Description: Off -white brittle material Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Mineral grains Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 2% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072289 Client Sample #: NWA- VCB1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Layer 2 of 2 Description: Light gray rubbery material Non - Fibrous Materials: Rubber /binder Description: Off -white soft mastic Non - Fibrous Materials: Mastic /binder Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% Synthetic fibers 2% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072290 Client Sample #: NWA- PNT3 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Gray textured paint Non- Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Paint, Mineral grains Layer 2 of 2 Description: Beige brittle material Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Mineral grains Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072291 Client Sample #: NWA- EJ2 -01 Location: NW Auto Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0 -3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government. Page 5 of 8 NVL Laboratories, Inc. awflucv 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 B www.nvllabs.com ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic material Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder, Paint Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 20% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072292. Client Sample #: NWA- VFS1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Tan linoleum Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Linoleum/binder Cellulose 22% Layer 2 of 2 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous backing with brown mastic Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder, Mastic/binder Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 55% Synthetic fibers 1% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072293 Client Sample #: NWA- WPG1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Beige putty material with paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Calcareous particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 3% Lab ID: 27072294 Client Sample #: NWA- WPG2 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Light gray putty material with red paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Calcareous particles, Binder /Filler, Paint None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 2% Lab ID: 27072295 Client Sample #: NWA- VFT1 -01 Location: NW Auto Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0 -3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government. Page 6of8 i NVL Laboratories, Inc. rKivanf 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 B www.nvIlabs.com ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Layer 1 of 2 Layer 2 of 2 Description: Beige tile Non - Fibrous Materials: Calcareous particles, Mineral grains Description: Tan brittle mastic Non- Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Mastic/binder Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % Chrysotile 2% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072296 Client Sample #: NWA- R02 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic material with gray paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asphalt/binder, Paint Cellulose 25% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072297 Client Sample #: NWA- PAP1 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous felt Non - Fibrous Materials: Asphalt/binder, Paint Other Fibrous Materials:% Cellulose 68% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072298 Client Sample #: NWA- R03 -01 Location: NW Auto Layer 1 of 2 Description: Black asphaltic material Non - Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asphalt/binder Polyethylene fibers 10% Layer 2 of 2 Description: Gray soft mastic Non- Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Mastic/binder None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 27072299 Client Sample #: NWA- CA6 -01 Location: NW Auto Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0-3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Govemment. Page 7of8 • NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 B www.nvIlabs.com ulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis #102063 By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710777.00 Client Project #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 26 Samples Analyzed: 26 Method: EPA/600R- 93/116 Layer 1 of 1 Description: Gray soft material with green paint Non - Fibrous Materials: Fine particles, Binder /Filler, Paint Other Fibrous Materials:% None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Alla Prysyazhnyuk Date: 07/18/2007 DRAFT Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R - 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 % =0 -3 %, 5 % =1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 % =40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government. Page 8of8 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100, Fax: 206.634.1936 www.nvllabs.com Analysis Report AIHA - IH # 101861 WA- DOE #C1765 AIHN ACCREDITED LABORATORY Total Lead (Pb) Client: Argus Pacific, Inc. Address: 1900 W. Nickerson St., Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Attention: Mr. Neil Callahan Project Location: NW Auto Batch #: 2710778.00 Matrix: Paint Chips Method: EPA 7000B Client Protect #: 4503.07 Date Received: 07/17/2007 Samples Received: 15 Samples Analyzed: 15 Sample RL in Results Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Weight mg/Kg in mg/Kg percent 27072300 NWA- pb1 -01 0.1602 52.0 < 52.0 < 0.0052 27072301 NWA- pb2 -01 0.1301 65.0 < 65.0 < 0.0065 27072302 NWA- pb3 -01 0.0808 100.0 2100.0 0.2100 27072303 NWA- pb4 -01 0.1477 57.0 66000.0 6.6000 27072304 NWA- pb5 -01 0.1136 74.0 3200.0 0.3200 27072305 NWA- pb6-01 0.0644 130.0 < 130.0 < 0.0130 27072306 NWA- pb7-01 0.0790 110.0 54000.0 5.4000 27072307 NWA- pb8 -01 0.1116 75.0 2100.0 0.2100 27072308 NWA- pb9 -01 0.1463 57.0 • 43000.0 4.3000 27072309 NWA- pb10 -01 0.1120 75.0 8900.0 0.8900 27072310 NWA- pb11 -01 0.1190 71.0 1400.0 0.1400 27072311 NWA- pb12 -01 0.1634 51.0 1800.0 0.1800 27072312 NWA- pb13 -01 0.1728 49.0 79000.0 7.9000 27072313 NWA- pb14 -01 0.0930 90.0 < 90.0 < 0.0090 27072314 NWA- pb15 -01 0.1342 63.0 4700.0 0.4700 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Ahmad Izzat Date Analyzed: 07/18/2007 DRAFT mg/ Kg = Milligrams per kilogram Percent = Milligrams per kilogram / 10000 Note : Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Rcnr•h Rijn Nn. 77- 0718 -1 RL = Reporting Limit ' <' = Below the reporting Limit Page 1 of 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Emerg.Pager. 206.344.1878 Fax: 206.634.1936 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) Client Argus Pacific, Inc. CHAIN of CUSTODY SAMPLE LOG Street 1900 W. Nickerson Street Suite 315 Seattle, WA 98119 Project Manager NE /t, CAt,1A1 HAA J Project Location Vit> A ltiTO • BATCH ID 2710778.00 swim- woo wry. NVL Batch Number Client Job Number 157 73. 017 Total Samples )/4 Tum Around Time ❑ 1 -Hr ,P24 -Hrs ❑ 4 Days ❑ 2 -Hrs ❑ 2 Days ❑ 5 Days ❑ 4-Hrs ❑ 3 Days ❑ 6 to 10 Days Please call for TAT less than 24 Hrs 999' -2112, VW-673o Email address iffaBknetgazaigilIMEat Phone: (206)d Fax: (206)MQEV Home niacka y,S porfiseatf/e.o ■ Asbestos Air • PCM (NIOSH 7400) ❑ TEM (NIOSH 7402) ❑ TEM (AHERA) • TEM (EPA Level II) ❑ Other sbestos Bu11LM (EPA/600 /R- 93/116) ❑ PLM (EPA Point Count) ❑ PLM (EPA Gravimetry) • TEM Bulk METALS "$ otal Metals 1 TCLP Det. Limit pm (AAS) Matrix aint Chips RCRA Metals ❑ Ali 8 ,Lead (Pb) Other Metals ❑ All 3 • Air Filter • Arsenic (As) • ppb (GFAA) • Drinking water • Paint Chips (Area) • Barium (Ba) • Mercury (Hg) • Copper (Cu) ri!�� ` 4 • Dust/wipe • Waste Water • Cadmium (Cd) ❑ Selenium (Se) • Nickel (Ni) ❑ Soil JVIVA - • Chromium (Cr) • Silver (Ag) • Zinc (Zn) Pb5ro1 A114) A- 14, 6 -o1 • Other Types of Analysis • Fiberglass ■ Silica • Nuisance Dust • Respirable Dust • Other (Specify) 8 Condition of Package:❑ Good ❑ Damaged (no spillage) ❑ Severe damage (spillage) Seq. # Lab ID Client Sample Number Comments A/R 1 ),� tJ i W � f it i AIWA- ph/ -n/ Argus -acific it, 7//9/ 2 ,...,/ Niti II 2 -0/ GddM/ -,1" t ti NV N V 3 \I-- t Sil � l lob NWA•- pi) 3 -o/ um" i /,/ ri!�� ` 4 1J/41A -/pb_Y-ol r Special instructions: Unless requested in writing, all samples will be disposed of two (2) weeks after analysis. lot ,e, emu a, • HI _ litSKArteD -to mackaj . S R par-1----0-1e.- or- - Two Sconn.2k-S adaw1 t a as I iW w — , & —o I - TI&4 S awl 9Le wi f-k 5 JVIVA - 6 Pb5ro1 A114) A- 14, 6 -o1 7 lJ1#UA - pLI* -ol 8 ANA -p6B -0 9 Math - 129 -01 10 NWrr -p610' O1 „ -oi 12 .NNQ- pbj► WA -01 13 r16i2 NW- 0I -b13- NWA - P611.1 -01 • 14 15 Print Below Sion Below Date Sampled.. ii,,, . Argus Pacific 1 f -12/y Relinquished •yi; Received by Analyzed by ),� tJ i W � f it i stele " /�� i i Argus -acific it, 7//9/ L ,...,/ GddM/ -,1" t ti NV N V 7•/ 'O% q \I-- t Sil � l Results Called by um" i /,/ ri!�� ` Results Faxed by r Special instructions: Unless requested in writing, all samples will be disposed of two (2) weeks after analysis. lot ,e, emu a, • HI _ litSKArteD -to mackaj . S R par-1----0-1e.- or- - Two Sconn.2k-S adaw1 t a as I iW w — , & —o I - TI&4 S awl 9Le wi f-k "focil -I- mile" even) wets rend tawA— ply �s -o i GAS e p ceav- vv/ skzuetvuovt. • APPENDIX D INSPECTOR CERTIFICATIONS our Ho rai-rning == a0 an �estos ,• : 'J. Inspector comptp t tlj tlje tra n riq requirenrent ,at lMe %.40 ICJ . 763 () EPA•Provider Cert. Number: 1085 SAFETY • TRAINING INDUSTRIA:: HYGIENE— Date(s) of Training Exam Score: NA Expiration Date: Feb 13, 2008 Argus Pacific Inc : 1900W Nickerson, Suite 315-• Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285 3373 • fax (206) 285 3927 r. 0 a h- `a se MP, Aiwa& ... ♦ ■uI 'IMO - llt • u;ii %`..w "` 3r. ?l :2 g,,tt4t"01141:4e'c ° .11 - - •■•,a4,,Ire -476C-47- - - - - • ' - - - r , J. CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus TYPE P-SEPA Planner: :Tot ;r l,; e -4[,v,'S • File Number: 50g_ 0 O l Application Complete (Date: i /2A 0 5 ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: Dad -476 / D07 - (177 NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: VOL u "rove./ c 1 F,t>.) - v p pa a 1 E-C7 et 3) Icritoc. %ttiay,/ LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. /O'? -30 Eft 1 1114-0411 N4 WA/ Say tl♦ S / L.//% 9 LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 0(0-39 "if /02- / 0 /23c V7 a/S DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Ad1D )44 N (Z Address: / ZZ O j '(v16.40 t, fs` /r.iT L. 644 4%.' F1wcP— Seellr L, (n4 Qv63 Phone: 6) 52 q3 E -mail: old tit(' It C so( -to-I__ FAX. V-6) 2tZ —%9 / P: \Planning Forms \ Applications \ 2007 Applications \ SEPAApp-1.2-07.doc STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanOlci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at /0230 G- ftlAaA.N4 L, LA/ S. R V6 $ for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at 5,9.d. (city) l JQ- (state), on a,, .I _ - 20 O Print Name `DA J 10 U . Address /2Z0/ 1 O &.JiCi4 ki 'L IS (-V , y 1" RZ/L 5E -4rtLe , . q S /6 S- Phone Number ( 206) 277 - 57 V S. Signature ■1111111 On this day personally appeared before me i/AU 1 D LA -141 & to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he%l4 signed the same as his/I voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. J SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1 DAY OF I NARY A. STATE OF WASHINOToN MUM— • — PUOUC MM OSION EXPIRES 4241109 20 0 AR PUBLIC in an or the State of Washington residing at '1151/1-12- My Commission expires on 12 q 08 P: \Planning Forms \Applications \2007 Applications \SEPAApp- 12- 07.doc DEC 21 2007 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION PWC2 T' II ..7-/F-RAY O.3 um OW ND .s s PAR( earns moo A uST. OW mono a cotortwo tot a. onott t. Tome" 73 RORTN .05 • 537 ge 40, Non yr, 15.13F XV 375 or. Kw os. OF STAN .13 ATI notooy SCUTRIKTO. NC. SAD .0 L. 705 FM KOR OR 10 • KW PO▪ LES 3 3455.25. • ROC towttymmottot • E. NO N. DI SCS IC N. Trt .. Of OM. NoRry 09 5s. FROlo Ron OF R.N.. P .., SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 2, 5550.1 15f.01,54 CONS.. 'roomy NIA woo, NE S30,15, ,r1FET OF PARCO • .J5r •51755 o0,3,4045 oRDNfo sypyry LEGEND oiT D..+tR boy ®° vrIn w I moo 1.7 E. • =OR wono, O moo. ...M ° Q Maw wool o m: rw R9tA wD ym T2 • 4. rtR PO ® OW 31.7.7 Da ova osst Ns) w OM Cot PCS uT W + $P 0°Q.100 • R• aW+W.5L1 340 50 ION OVONE ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY AS ADOPTED BY AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION AND a"D NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS (A.MEMDER ORGANIZATION OF THE AMERICAN CONGRESS ON SURVEYING AND MAPPING) ;:�.,) no aaA aE CI 47s7. 010. • 1-Wt < pi �[ x 19..1 1j1 - . I --Neaw low .ees'o'_( --• ▪ ▪ ► Irv- -^ —•,` i/ cl\ 1 19 µ? E S Ot7iS 710 LATCY• VAS, SURVEY INFORMATION PROCWURE / N.HW.IM,,, - FIDo N.1.5050 a DA ° . tx� S " E Sq. S __ vow r ^x MOROWA*OWL - NAPS OP WOKS at. a too wu - tr) wavcu mR Krs mao.rt Tom bosix 11rT01 M .OAIUM 0•50F £IFVrn0NSwm ee NOTE md AS H mffM ¢ NnK . Is w�a BE MIL= CO >NWDaW ss PROJECT INFORMATION g=5.5 T1 NOLOR•N fLM9[A OLODULATED LANDO rt.r nN4u 11wm.115 . [.L_ ZONING _+ola:vx i -!d nu: Ln.rw K[.n s irMn rotP.:.cn>.cx:rs:PA.. QeiNIN., _,d T. D.c. Ra c:.s '^ RAC •\ i rsVIr TD: bos {o+ tunt0r ptu •'•r sa.n n W� uta . tr .Nr t ut f O5C O. PS MINN •tTto room <�Y s-...- 704 ST9EEE `v w 1 xA9n.aNR� tor st NRS59'561P :6T as • Roe MCI SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION D: r, PC.twD,F DO∎•∎ T4 L OP AND MS SOMEV wND t101 IT IS WV, w.f. WM in orITH 1N:. STA.N.P0 DETAIL PED.P.ENISr0rM ALTA /KS. WD mtE SVME'S. • AND n5P5 . . AND wcuA6 OENS t, Lwo (Pi)DR DTwBL<E EDF. wPSUUn m Mc KwRK. STANDARDS AS AMPPico GOWNS .. EFrm oA� a MS URIFr.TUm. UNDERSIGNED FUNNIER . SSum� OR RECAT RED :N ENE STAR aF EWTNT POSE30 KMW.w' d - Fx[E`•D MAT wwY. SPEE,U MfRELN. // Gfs% z_v l aykoj .ASONCION REDS , FON NO •1296 '03 J 1- W CO frA I�yli� I 3 r a STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: NW Auto Voluntary Clean-Up Project and demolition 2. Name of Applicant: Sabey Corporation 12201 Tukwila Int'1 BLVD, 4th Floor Seattle, WA 98168 3. Date checklist prepared: February 6, 2008 4. Agency requesting checklist City of Tukwila 5.. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The proposed schedule for this project is to begin work on March 1, 2008 and be complete by May 31, 2008. Within the above window of time, we would commence soils remediation to remove hazardous material from the soil on -site as well as demolition the existing buildings on the site. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or anther activity related to or connected with this proposal? Yes. Once we have cleaned up the site and remediated the soil, the site will eventually be a part of a larger development project once all of the approvals for a comprehensive master plan and rezone have taken place. However, there are no specific development proposals at this time. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. We have had a Good Faith Estimate prepared by Argus Pacific that outlines various types and amounts of chemicals in the soil within the project site. Additionally, we have prepared a Soils Remediation Plan with Dalton, Olmsted & Fuglevand (environmental consultants) that illustrates the means by which we will clean the soil on the site. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No, none that we are aware of that directly affect this proposal. RECEIVED FEB 0 7 2008 DEVELOPMNT 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Demolition/grading permits (D07 -476, D07 -477) 10. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. With respect to this project proposal, our intention is two -fold: we intend to engage in a voluntary clean-up project (VCP) to clean the soil on the project property, and, to conduct demolition on the existing buildings on the site. The is currently occupied by five buildings that we are seeking to demolish: a garage, a warehouse, an office, a shed, and a multi - purpose canopy. The future use(s) of this project site are currently unknown and have yet to be determined. The size of the project size is approximately 157,500 SF between two parcels (0423049015, 0423049102). 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including the street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the sites. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic, map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The location of the project proposal can be identified by the following information: Street Address: 10230 East Marginal Way South, Seattle WA 98168 Parcel Numbers: 0423049015 (that portion of government lot 8, section 4, township 23 north, range 4 east Willamette meridian, in king county, Washington), 0423049102 (that portion of government lot 8, section 4, township 23 north, range 4 east, Willamette meridian, in king county, Washington) 12. Doe the proposal lie within an area designated on the city's comprehensive land use policy plan map as environmentally sensitive? No, this area of this project proposal is not known to fall on an environmentally sensitive area. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The proposed project site is generally flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately five percent on a very small area of the site. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. t Soil types are generally a top layer of loose to medium dense alluvial sand and a soft lower layer of estuarine silt; both are of varying thickness over the site. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? No e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Between the two parcels indicated on the project site, we plan to grade approximately 1500 cubic yards of soil. The purpose of this action is to facilitate our voluntary clean-up project -in an effort to remediate the soil from containing higher levels of undesirable materials. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Erosion on this project site is very unlikely due to the nature of the flat terrain. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? This project will not involve construction of any new impervious surfaces. However, in later proposals following this action, the estimation of impervious surfaces would be approximately 95 %, or, the same as the current, existing conditions. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impact to the earth, if any: None proposed at this time based on project scope and improbability of erosion. g. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust automobile odors, industrial smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During the demolition portion of the project, there will inevitably be small amounts of dust created from the action. Given the smaller scope of the demo, as well as current/prevailing weather conditions, the dust should settle and be insignificant in nature within a very short period of time. b. Are there any off -site sources or emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? No c. Proposed measure to reduce or control emissions or other impact to air, if any: Utilization of proportionate quantities of moisture /water during the demo to control dust as necessary. 3. Water a. Surface 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? No 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? N/A 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of the fill material. None Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descriptions, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste material to surface water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No b. Ground 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc). Describe the general . size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the . number of animals or humans the sytem(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known) Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The runoff water on the proposed project site will collect and be disposed of by the current storm water /runoff drainage system. The water will not flow into other waters. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The runoff water impacts will be insignificant with this project and the use of pre- existing drainage systems should prove to be more than sufficient to control surface and ground water in this project area. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on this site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet, soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X Other types of vegetation -Urban Landscaping 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None Known. This is a highly developed urban location. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impact; if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are existing chemicals and potential hazards in the soil at the proposed project site. Due to the existence of this "dirty soil" we have executed a good faith estimate indicating what types and quantities of waste are in the soil. We have also developed a remediation plan to clean the soil as part of this project. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. There are currently no anticipated needs for any special emergency services 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: We have developed a soils remediation plan that will significantly reduce environmental health hazards on this site. a. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from I -5 and adjacent surface streets and air traffic noise from Boeing field 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short term or long term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation , other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There would be noises associated with the demolition of some buildings as part of the project. However, this aspect of the project will not last very long -a short term basis. There will be some traffic associated with the demolition with heavy equipment/machinery. There will also be other earth moving equipment on site (approximately during the hours of 9am to 5pm daily) to move dirt to be cleaned on site. 3. Proposed measures to control noise impacts, if any: Expedite process, in a safe and efficient manner, in an effort to keep the noise at a minimum, for the shortest duration of time possible. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Currently, the site is unused. Prior to our ownership of the site, the project location was an auto wrecking site. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. The site currently has the following with respective square footage: Office (1,847 SF) Warehouse (3,480 SF) Garage (1,523 SF) Shed (2,306 SF) Canopy (388 SF) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. All of the above; represented on 8c e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MIC -H f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The Comprehensive Plan designation is Manufacturing /Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC -H); located within Tukwila's MIC. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify? No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None following this project j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: This proposal is a "pre- step" to the Comprehensive Plan future land use map and a rezone of the property. In connection with these actions, the City will undertake an evaluation of the proposal's consistency wit the existing Comprehensive Plan and with land uses in the vicinity. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicated whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, • middle, or low income housing. None c. Proposed measure to reduce or control housing impacts: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N /A; this is a demolition and Voluntary clean -up project b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare form the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/A c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. Activities on Boeing Field generate some light and glare, but this is not anticipated to significantly impact the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Museum of Flight is located to the North of the project property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe? No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or application, if any? None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. Or proposed for, national, state, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on t or next to the site. Not known c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impact, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans if any. Property is served by I -5, E. Marginal Way S. Airport way S., and S. Norfolk ST. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest bus stop. The nearest transit stop is located adjacent to the east boundary of the property, on E. Marginal Way. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the completed project eliminate? N /A,N /A d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This project will not noticeably increase additional trips per day. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 1k, 15. Public Services a. - ,Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? Ifs o, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer are available at the site b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Specific utilities will not be needed for this demolition/VCP project. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: (NON- PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 6 Fe-3 08f RECEIVED 07 1008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Applicant Name: $Q37 CorzPazr4i- I e/ jrlvto Street Address: /ZZo/ -Tvkwi e.q /Nit 't gc vA V1'1' FL City, State, Zip: CE.4-77Z -4, LA-44 .. 9 ?/6 Telephone(?', ) 27 - S20/ Directions This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, or Cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. P: \Planning Forms \Applications \2007 Applications \SEPAApp- 12- 07.doc Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (TMC 18.06.370). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 MD Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (18.06.145). Please circle appropriate response. et) Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. I■12,- Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (TMC 18.06.385). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 5 -0 •- Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. b- Continue to Question 6 -0 YES - Continue to Question 6 -0 P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \2007 Applications \SEPAApp- 12- 07.doc City of Tukwila"ESA Screening Checklist Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (TMC 18.06.490). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. Checklist Complete YES — Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. 0 Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development;. or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development. Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development (TMC 18.06.445). Please circle appropriate response. QO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 • City of Tukzvitlit SA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stormwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2). YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -3. YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) City of Tukwila Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man-made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the . cross- sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, Logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. City of Tukwila Screening Checklist NO - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 YES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1:' T1441 PORTON OF THE NORTHWEST 01441705 OF SEMEN 3. 101161® 23 NORDL RANGE 4 (451. 86140(6440 WREN. N ANG COUNTY. WASHINGTON. LYNNG SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LOGE OF 1X0 1001X1' CROW DON410N MHO CRAM AND WEST OF THE RENT-OF-WAY OF PUGET SOUND ELECTRIC RAILWAY. ALT -A / ACSM- LAND TITLE SURVEY AS ADOPTED BY AMERICAN LAND TTTT.E ASSOCIATION AND NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS . (A MEMBER ORGANIZATION OF THE AMERICAN .CONGRESS ON SURVEYING AND MAPPING) \6 POWER POLE • TR PARCEL 2: • THAI PORTION OF COVE886447 LOT 8. SECTION . 4. TOWNS® 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. 9054161/6 111 601844, IN ARC COUNTY. WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS COMM: . 0EGI 94090 ON THE EAST LINE OF 5A0 GOVERMENT LOT 9 AT A POUT WHICH 6 NORTH CO_ 21' 24' EAST; 200 FEET 7501 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH O0. 21' 24' EAST. 189.77 FEET: THENCE WEST 375 861. MAE OR LESS, 10 THE NORTHEASTERLY 1NE'OF STATE RIND NO. 1 AS 904 ESTARI5HEU, THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG 590 ROAD 194E 205 FEET. MORE •ER LESS, 70 A PONE WHICH REARS NORM 89 20''54- WEST FROM THE PONT OF BE69b4840; THERM 504119 69 20' 54' FAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH UWE OF. SAID GNOMON LOT 8, 265 IEET. CORE OR LESS, TO THE PONT OF BEGNR6G. PARCEL 3: ' • THAT PORTION OF COIEMBIDI7 LOT a SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANCE 4 EAST. WILY MF.TE 40 084, IN 0X0 COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . MORNING ON TlE EAST 1141E OF 590 GOVERNMENT LOT AT A PONT 68404 45 NORTH 0 21' 24' FAST. 389.77 FEET PROM TINE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF: THENCE NORTH OP 2:' 24' UST ALONG 540 EAST UNE 174.65 FEET: THENCE DUE WEST TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF MOOR( STATE HIGHWAY N0. 1 AS ESTABL460 BY DEM TO TIE STATE OF WASHINGTON.'RECORDED -UNDER REOOROIG.10. .. 3440535. N ICING COUNTY. wAS*NGEON: - - THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG 580 NORTHEASTERLY MME 195 FEET. 955E OR LESS. TO A • PONT DIE VEST OF DE PONE OF BEONHINO: 1NCNCE EAST 395 FEET. MORE OR LESS, TO DC PONY Or BEGINNING PARCEL 4: . • THAT. PORTION Or SECTION .4. 10611944 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. WIWWETE 1E0I166. W- ANG COMM WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOUD85, .BEG78484 AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE 00UTN LINE OF THE T. GROWS 0014410N. I NO . CLAM WITH THE EAST LRB.OF SAID SECTION 4; TH1 GC 23' 1r WEST ALONG SAID EAST UiE 137.23 FEET TO TIC 7181E PONT - BEGINNING: • THENCE SOUTH 00.23' 1r WEST. 20.00 FEET: M - THENCE NOR 89 56' 12' WEST, 448.01. FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST NAMA4L WAY SOUTH: THENCE NORTH TY 39' 19• WEST RANG 5A0 VAR41 TO A POINT MUCH BEARS Nonni ' B9 58' 12- WEST FROM THE ERIE POINT Cr BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH BY 58' 12- FAST TO 1XE'TRUE 408E OF •80374/0C. 601 FOU00 F740 1 -1/4' RON PPE . /WOOD PLUG 60 TAX 0.5' S AND 0.2' 6. OF 1 END 1 -3/4- BON PPE 0.r 5 A40 0.1' Mor 1 E lC C*6-6.0.77 E 18- CONC 5.7.69 STORM DRAIN NH 5611.1871 E 9D MEASURE/CENTS F10.1-3/4' IRON PIPE J ASPHALT CNANLNK FENCE 06 5 AND • 10 W Or 0 ONN POLL CI491LNN FENCE ECBD40Y BLOCK WALL 48CE . 0.4.5/r1 0180EDR FENCE ENO - G7CH 8894 0.3"5 OF 1 ASN . 994.1236 YLT - .•I`AIE.IO YDSIREYFNIS NBB'S0'10'W 456.90 _•--r - -- SEAN. CASINO POTHER POLE /TRANS/OWER AND UNDERGROUND CATCH BASIN ME I - . R01.17.55 • E 12' ADS 5.15.61 CATCH BASIN TYPE I R44.17.67 E 12' ADS 14.15.52 E 12' ADS 5.15.46 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 55.1754 E 1r ADS 9.15.32 E Ir 635 5.15.24 PARCEL 4;°6 1P9T „M1 42.''r BUILLOC OVERHANG TSE• @.HH .12 46 DIRT .1246 GAT • CONTROL BOX (2) EXISTING BUILDING CATO4 BASIN TYPE I 894.17.55 E 12' ADS 14.15.16 E 12' ADS 54 15.09 CI4NLNK FENCE 8.4 E Or • SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. EASEMENE AND THE TERNS AND 0301/046 HEREOF: PURPOSE: PIMPLE AND 0904468 S15TN /AEA A1FECEEO A SOUTHERLY PO TON OF PACK 1 . RECORDED: 41ARO4 21, 1949 RECUROR441 60.: 3845856 2. (ASO4(VT AND THE 7ER16 AND COCOONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: C0■11404 MANAGE UE AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF PARCELS 2 APO 3 RECORDED WICH 21. 1949 RECORDING NO_ 3885859. AS SHOWN SAID N4RUMENT COMMIS P90693t6 FOR BEARNG DC COST Or WN1E848NCE. REPAR OR RECONSTRUC10N'OF THE COMMON DRAINAGE UE EFT OE USERS. 3. EASDENI NO 7146 TEN6 AND C00006 TERM GRANTEE: STATE OF WASHINGTON PURPOSE: 57054 SEWER AREA 8TECIED: THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET or.•A00 1 RECORDED: 41AR04 19. 1905 - RECORDING N0.: 5856636 • AS SHORN - • - 4. CA566ENT CO410(08 D 04 9G. COUNTY .SUPERIOR COOR7•NND THE TERNS AND CONDDIONS 1106000: N FAVOR OF OWNERS AND FUTURE OWNERS. OF *010000 WETS PURPOSE: INGRESS. EGRESS NO UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: THE SOUTHERLY 20 FEET OF PARCEL 3 CAUSE NO.: 451768 99(59441 NOT PROVIDED 5.-25. NOT APPLICABLE TO BE. SHOWN ON ALTA SURVEY. . SURVEY INFORMATION PROCEDURE' / NARRATIVE ' A FIELD TRAVERSE USING A 1.13CA TCR 703' TOTAL MOBIL 810 "MS ROGER' OA1A COLLECTOR SUPPLEMENTED WIEH FEED NOTES WAS PI:WOR ED. EST,BS86 THE NONA.' DISTANCE. AND VERTICAL RE A10NR9P5 BETWEEN DE 10NIREN15. PROPERTY LRES, A10 10PWRAP10C FEATURES AS SHOWN HEREON. A 16672 8 -2A- AUTOWTIC LEVEL IRS USED TO CHECK AND ESIABSI DC ELEVATEN OF 010081015 NO CONTROL FONTS. 11E RESULTING ENTA IEETS'OR EXCEEDS 114E STANDARDS FOR LAND 491001RY SURVEYS AS SET FORTH N RAC 332 -130 -090. .DATES OF SURVEYS FICLD SURVEYS BY DAAM4AM COGIAT4G ENQED6.'NC' , CONDUCTED JANU9Y 10, 2007 ALL MONTH EHS SHOWN AS FOUND WERE VISITED AT DIM 16E.- HORI2ONTAL" DATUM - 6AS15 OF BEARINGS ITC BASS OF BEARINGS 6 THE WANG BERME/4 ISOOT 1004404/ 1C17 -1 AND CP170005 -269, THEN AS SOUTH *906'36' EASE, BARD UPON NOON ANER689 CRTUM Or 1963 - N40 63 (91) - WASHINGTON STATE PLANE GOOF/COWL 51S ECµ NORM TONE - VERTICAL DATUM - 8/515 OF ELEVATIONS NORM AMERIUN VERTICAL DOW OF 1968 - NAND 88 THE BEN015A04 6 WSDOT 60941.1IE6 I C17 -1. 16E9 AS 51.22 FEET . NOTE 1. UNOEAGRDUMD UB11E5 AND FEATURES DEPICTED HEREON NE BASED ON'FELD OBSERVATION. IORXRG5. DEVELCRENT RAMS. AND/OR A ILA81E RLLORD. DOCUMENTS 'ONLY. TIC TRUE LOCATION. NATURE AND/OR EXISTENCE OF BELOW GROUND FEATURES DETECTED OR UNDETECTED.' 40ULD BE VERIFIED. ' 2. 016630 TITLE 06URAM,E COLWAI4 CO4NTT1EN7 N0. 001222491. (DATED OCTOBER. 30. 2006 AT BOO A.M.)' WAS RELIED UPON FOR TOLE MFNN495N AND SUPPORTING 00c04EN75• PLEASE REEER TO THAT REPORT FOR FUMER.NFORM09N REGARDING FINANCIAL NATTERS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SLAW .% . PROJECT INFORMATION • TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER • - SHE ADDRESS 683290015101 • 102030 FAST 4105441 ' WAY SOUTH SFATSE.9A 98160 CALCULATED (AND AREA 295,926 2 SQUARE FEET . . . 6.82 f ACRES - - - CURRENT OWNER .. . RAN ,NA,41_ Lc: i.93/ 4'8:22 .4i:,w, ZONING .(87) GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 2 - FOR THAT LING PL THE O7Y K T419CA N) MA415ACMROG 90USTRVL CENTER/HEAVY - FOR. TOUT LYRE N THE O15 W • CATCH WSW TYPE I [81.17.61 E 17' A05 4.14.98 E 12- Ao5 5.15.01 CATCH R5.1. E 6' PVC 0.111.. E 6' PVC 5.11.:• E 4' PVC 9.12.39 4' PVC 6.11.99 CATO4 9.496 TYPE I 95.17.62 E 12' ARTS 6.14.97. Q 12'6355.14.99 CATCN BASH TYPE I RW.17.62 ^' • 0 11' A05 04.14.75 Q 12- ADS 5. 14.77 - SANITARY 564406 MN 89.18.01 Q 47' CONC NAP 86 . E 47' CONC 5 -9.96 CATCH BASIN 4540 1. . RIR414.06 E 6' PVC 5.12.09 E 6' PVC 6.12.00 E 4' COW '0.12.13 PLUMED E 4' CONC W.12.10 PLUGGED k w r_ >. J w CC o • ° Z 3 z W S a LUCO J (.7 - • E ▪ 0 CELL O Z O z I- • 07 R' g z 3 \ W zoo, O. l- (n ° H 0 0 J ~ < . c O m a Q 1- ryANA tv-rt_ F1.000 INFORMATION FELON/ EMERGENCY WNAGEAEHT AGENCY (FL18) 9EVOMTION FON (71.000 76111RAA410E RATE NAP) NAP No. 5303303545 F PANEL 645 OF 1725. DATED NAY 16. 1995 THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 6 N ZONE X NEAT Cr 599 -YEAR FLOOD: YEAS of U9-4TA9 41000 WITH AVERAGE OEPT6 LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR 26114 ORA48CE AREAS IL55 DUN '1 45450' MA[; AND 880*5,PROTC(ED BY LEVEES FM. 100 -r42 8000. • • CONE IETrm6 96µi CONC RETARGE w'ALL STAIRS' YARD GRAN 66.14 65 E 4' PVC 4.1178 E 4' PVC 8.1163 119807 CATO4 BASIN 11PE I 446.17.47 E 1r ARTS 01.14.53 E 1r ADS 5.14.42 .ER POLL L TRANSFORMER AMD • d1Y 4471105. CATCH -BASN.TYPE I 95.17.68 E'lr ADS 6.14,41 CATCH 'r -,r AS 5.14.38 E 12' ADS 14.14,43 .E 12- ADS 8.1 90 • E 12' 409•5•14 5 - r.. N8tF1 'N 266.91'.__....._: = a 8$pH1ALIJ ,eS ASPHALT 11.5 a R 4LO146WL1N1 .4 [ F,A0 FENCE 040 6 . ON41NN ONCE. 2.4. 50F1 2.,' 5OF1 G101 A414 RAti B14K END YFASIlnEME615 04NUR FENCE 14wCE1 g15J:3 104TH SiRE CH4R(i41 FENCE 1.0'[OF1 092 \' I ‘-ist r Q9lC . J .T1• _ • i .ice •'.. •°� REC. 940. 5856836 tcoLoCY BOCK j WAU FACT „,c„ R��A ;+' - -u - "• J 10 U 0 0 O LEGEND L69MiE TARO LIGHT O18 POWER IOU (RM) POWER 140 AMI08 BOX (A5 10EED) WROTE meal EACH DM (06) PERM ma1a0 (5de0 WINO SEWA WNW (5160 569040 SEM [TGWU! (5350 406 METER (d) ---- ASpuL7 N86- 59'56 -W 287 344080111 FENCE 5109 TRAIN 91 0.0' S AND TYPE 0- 1.5' E of 1 - - 85.12.66 E 18' CONC SE.626 [ 24' CONC 68.0.66 4045 WEE BOER COLE (04) FtE R'OANI (Rq. OMER MOOR (YIN) 971 066440 SE51 PaE (5P) ROTE COMM COMT G141 POST RYCE POST k • .i • - 9441@ UE - SNEMR SEVER NNE m - -_ 4L19'DRA09E LYE -0 -9- GV5Mt - MONDE 840FR060.40 AMC PIRALM0OG40 • • 11910 POOR 4.18F/D ' -x- 04184 17a TaQ «al ... ,111 MIL:7.51Mle SCALE: 1'•50' Vlobllty Map NO 80.019 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION ASPHALT :.e4 BOLLARDS (4) . DR 1X4 • 51099 CRAP/ 194' 89.14.01 E 54' CRP E.5.31 -.E 54' CIO 6.5.21 E 18' 55E NO 9415410904 ' E 24' SE NO *4EASUYEIQN1 C149AIN FENCE 1.1' 5 AND 7.1' EOr'1 • 5T09 ORNN 9H 59.1535 / • Q NO 14EASIRENO/I 5• to CATCH WON 794E I •�"Sp " 4. I RID. E 6' SW 56 E 1B" CLIP 5W.B.6 0 IE l0. RC 51( NE.8.70 • E r W.10.10 O r W F- 0) OG 1.1) J 0 C) T0: THE BENAROYA COMPANY, LLC. AND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; TH5 IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PUT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH T 5 BASED WERE MADE N ACCORDANCE van.' 'MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REOUIREMENTS' FOR ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYS.' JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS IN 2005, AND INCLUDES. ITEMS ' 1, 3, 4,• 5. ' 8, 9. 10. AND 11(b) OF TABLE A THEREOF. PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS AS ADOPTED' BY ALTA AND NSPS AND IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THIS CERTIFICATION. UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION, AS A LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED' IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, THE RELATIVE POSTIONAL ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEY DOES NOT EXCEED THAT WHICH 6 SPECIFIED THEREIN. WILLIAM R. WORKMAN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WASHINGTON. REGISTRATION N0. 41298 ( ' V�L Y ►A ; . VV_ EY • cowsJ 4-I