Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA EPIC-02-87 - CITY OF TUKWILA - I-405 MANHOLE REPLACEMENTS
I -405 HOV MANHOLE RELOCATION NEW MANHOLES & RELOCATE SEWER LINES I -405 EPIC -2 -87 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal I -405 HOV Manhole relocation Proponent City of Tukwila Location of Proposal, including street address, if any west of eastbound on ramp to I -405 south of S line bridge Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC : 2 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. �[ There is no comment period for this DNS E[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Thursday, March 26, 1987 . The lead agency will . not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible. Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwil Signature 188 Amp-4C -4r4I_IWPF You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS • • CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS ( ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal Highway Administration Office of Archaeology Transportation Department ( ) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( )Dept. of Social and Health Services Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * )department of Game )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations KING COUNTY AGENCIES ) Dept. of Planning & Community Devel ) Fire District 18 ) Boundary Review Board ) Health Department ( ) South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Washington Natural Gas ( ) Water District 75 ( ) Seattle Water Department ( ) Group W Cable ( ) Kent Planning Department ( ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ( ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ( ) - Public Works ( ) - Parks and Recreation ( ) - Police ( ) - Fire ( ) - Finance ( ) - Planning /Building • ( )Fire District 1 ( )Fire District 24 ( )Building & Land Development Division - SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES ( )Puget Sound Power & Light ( )Val -Vue Sewer District ( )Water District 20 ( )Water District 25 ( )Water District 125 (- )Union Pacific Railroad CITY AGENCIES ( )Renton Planning Department ( )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: ( )- Edgar Bauch ( )- Marilyn Stoknes ( )- Joe Duffie ( )- Mabel Harris ( )- Charlie Simpson ( )- Jim McKenna ( )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ) Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) ( )METRO Environmental Planning Division ) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Office /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more ) Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more MEDIA ) Daily Journal of Commerce �) /07/ /WW-s. ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 1 CN EPIC cool' 87 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: :120)5A)10( 11144444QLE TO: U BLDG ri PLNG n P.W. n FIRE PO ICE n P & R PROJECT fekta, /+ eli 1,14A hole P w �O f 4 s -t•ic br. LOCATION 4e # - s > ni/!ti /l��ilK. i n I- I: o W T TRANSMITTED RESPONSE REQUESTED BY DATE NSMITTED RA as STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT m c--- - DATE i COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: IZ1 BLDG Q PLNG PROJECT bioat 7G eiet • CN EPIC al' 87 FILE -yOS A- t*,wdoLE n FIRE 171 POLICE 17 P & R Mal) hole LOCATION � / e y i o Ir r i e i n T 4 0 . fod S -t�iu, br►, i n I. el OL•W DATE TRANSMITTED d RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .f RESPONSE RECEIVED STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT RIcn 0111—. "'tote& DATE �j i/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY 1 C.P.S. Form 11 . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If—yes, please describe and attach available plans. n/a 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. n/a 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. none • • Evaluation for 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. GAS AND ELECTRICAL TO CARRY OUT -CO X S-IR.UCIIO ACTIVIT ^I ES- b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONF 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. TYPICAI FOR THIS TYPF QF CONSTRUCTION ( rl `5 1,1 j3 ' trr4 2 . ( It) L$ ar _PI DS(0iv 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. TIIKWILA FIRF DFPT VFHICLFS IN CASF OF CONSTRUCTION RFIATED ACCIDENT 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Agency Use Only CONFINE CONSTRUCTION TO _ _ EASFMFNTS /RIGHT OF WAYS CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN EPIC of 57 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: 1:1456444b10( it4I4114.kL TO: 71 BLDG PLNG n P.W. n FIRE POLICE [] P & R PROJECT rdetal effigiel I4a./1/l l€ LOCATION 4 W o . �" r» limbo ne /fh /d i14, w �Q4sfo� S- C�iu.br►. in I- tl�r r 01.0.11, DATE TRANSMITTED RESPONSE REQUESTED BY Q j STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT �l V V 0 l C7''') 4(4324A-t. ck g ALS AtWAVe 490 /orai/Pdi4 totti �rlhic�l av1 ,91S6(fi' 761-. O�DP.Q.7S.377') !�(1 / %��J.(� Gt/l# i%I 6//g/Ii _MD CemryruAt �— /rr J� io�B7 DATE � 6/ ( COMMENTS PREPARED BY t C.P.S. Form 11 Cont. No. Epic File No. MG- Fee $100.00 Receipt No. (.0 /4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: I- 405 -HOV MANHOLE 2. Name of applicant: CITY OF TUKWILA P.i�9 ,ye3 \15'1 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. 433 -1850 - PHIL FRASER 4. Date checklist prepared: 2/13/87 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 40 CAfFNDAR DAYS AFTER AWARD - ANTICIPATE AWARD IN MARCH, 1987 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. I- 405 -HOV LANES - THIS REDO OF MANHOLES IS IN ANTICIPATION OF THIS HOV PROJECT THROUGH WSDOT 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NO KNOWLEDGE 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. I -405 HOV PLANNING PROCESS 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. / WSDOT PERMIT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. CONSTRUCT 2 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES, AND ABANDON ONE EXISTING MANHOLE TO REROUTE SANITARY SEWERAGE LINES OUT OF FUTURE HOV LANES AND CURTAIN WALLS. THIS PROPOSAL IS LOCATED JUST INSIDE THE WSDOT R/W JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANDOVER PARK WEST AND TUKWILA PARKWAY 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. LOCATED JUST INSIDE THE WSDOT R/W JUST NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANDOVER PARK WEST AND TUKWILA PARKWAY 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. sand & peat d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. no e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. minor grading. Excavation of existing sois to provide underground structures f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. minor erosion,can occur = sexcavations over 4 feet in depth will require shoring g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 2 - 21/21 diameter manhole covers 111 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Shoring f6rrrex6avati_nnc nver 4 feet in depth 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. emissions: construction vehicles b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your. proposal? If so, generally describe. no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: none beyond normal emission eugipment regj1ired of licensed state constructinn vehicles 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows )n o. no 411 III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If—yes, please describe and attach available plans. n/a 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. n/a 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. no 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. none 410 (II 'Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. none anticipated 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. - dement' e--- avted bacirJi-nto- ex4sting system during- canstiucLion c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. EQUIVALENT TO ZERO RUNOFF - ONLY 2 MANHOLE LIDS AT GROUNDESURFACE Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. SEWERAGE WILL BE CONTAINED IN EXISTING . . '11 OUTE IS. CONSTRUCTED. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: _I,[A 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 2 MANHOLE I TDSNTLI RFPIAGE -_1lVa _MANHOLE LID .AT SURFACF c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONF • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: REPLACE III I OR NEW GRAss PLANTING 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: NONF ORSFRVFn mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: NONE OBSERVFn fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: N/A b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NOT KNOWN d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. GAS AND E FrT-R.ICAIr TO CARRY OUT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NONE 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ? TYPICAI FOR THIS TYPF_OF CONSTRUCTION 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. TUKWIIA FIRF DFPT VFHICLES IN CASE' OF (r.ONSTRIICTTON RFI ATFD ACCIDFNT 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: CONFINE CONSTRUCTION TO FASFMENTSJRIGHT OF WAYS • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. SHORT TERM ONLY: BACK HOE, TRUCKS. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? I -405 TO TIENTORTH, TUKWILA PARKWAY AND SEATTLE ' 7-177111-501M-1— I -405 ONE RAMP TO THE�EAST , COMMERCIAL CBD SOUTH OF TUKWILA PARKWAY b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT CURRENTLY c. Describe any structures on the site. • • Evaluation for d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? EX`ISTHNG SEWER MAHOLE WILL BE PARTIALLT- DEMOLISHED. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? PUBLIC WSDOT R/W f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? I -405 & HOV IMPROVEMENTS g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NONE h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentallyOsensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NONE j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: COMPAI1XBLE WTTR PRUJECTEU I -405 �OV PROJECT Agency Use Only Ye5 •CG • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how- many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? NONE b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? ()FEET b. What views in the immediate vicinity would altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of }Fight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NONE— c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,. including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: • • Evaluation for 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. -405 ON RAMP IS ACCESS TO SITS- -F-ROM- TUKWILA PARKWAY b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NO c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including drivevrays? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 5 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: LIMIT ACCESS OFFOF I 405 ON RAMP 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. [TMTTS ON-ACCESS-777r- Agency I- ACCESS TO TE IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities— currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, Vitary sew y, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 2 SEWER MANHOLES AND APPERTENANCES;STUKWILA SEWER DIVISION PROVIDES SERVICE; BAURE, TRU ' ' 1 ' 1 1' XC'V'T 1 D CINSTRUCTION OF TWO MAHOLES C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to mak 'ts Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? NO ADDED DISCIIARGE INTO WATER Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? MINIMAL SEE PRIOR RESPONSES TO LIKE - QUESTIONS Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: SEE SECTIONS 4 & 5 OF PREVIOUS QUESTIONAIRE • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. Now would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? WILL NOT Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: BY THIS CONSTRUCTION, GREATER ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM AFTER I 405 _0 0. TO REACH SYSTEM. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? WON'T IIIEvaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/1 How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Ay( 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? WILL NOI Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. NUT AWAKE OF ANY CUNI-LIUI 0 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? NO Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A ,TG.BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• 110 Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY TO SEWERAGE SYSTEM AFTER I -405 NOV BUILT THROUGH WSDOT 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? NOT BUILD I -405 HOV REBUILD SEWER SYSTEM AT ANOTHER LOCATIONS 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: OTHER ALTERNATIVES UNREALISTIC . AS IHL HUV WILL kit LONSIKUC.IEU AND RLLOCAIIUN OF IHt SEWER SYSIEM IS 100 COSILY. IHLRLFURE IKE PREFERRED SOLUTION .[U RLCUNSIRUCI=IHE SEWER MANHOLES ALLOWING FUR AUUESSII3TLIIY AFTER THE HOV IS IHL PREFERRED UOURSL OF ACTION. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- • M -I ©04 7 © 411GEMn f=/ ROAMS 1 i �J R -A 11 �' R-H20 2) f , \\\ // r_.2 ,,\ • RJ R1120 iG• °\ ) R-4 Na M Salt4A � M-4 II II 11 II II �Ir R-I -120 R-1 -120 LEGEND R -A AGRICULTURAL 9 -1 -200 SINGLE FAMLY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RF_SIDENT1AL . 1 -96 R -1 -120 M-I R -1 -120 R-1-96 SNC1E FAMLY RESIDENTIAL R -1 -72 STOLE FAMLY RESIDENTIAL R -2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-3 TFI EE AND F0&6 R+MLY RESIDENTIAL LOW APARTMENTS RMi MULTIPLE RESDENCE HIGH DENSITY 9-0 Pf CFES90NAL AND OFFlCE 2 -1 t`923- m-1cm PETAL C -2 REGIONAL RETAL C -P PLANNED BUSINESS DENTE%, C -M INDUSTRIAL PARK M-I LIGHT NDUSTRf M -2 FE/A/Y INDUSTRY C C an c M - -- I I I1( /` /si CM \t\ MI - R MI - - -- -- �� -� Cu. APRL 20. 1982 C