HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-03-88 - SOUTCHENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK / BUILDING 447 - PARKING LOT AND TURN-AROUNDBUILDING 447 - SOUTHCENTER
SOUTH BUSINESS PARK
PARKING LOT ADDITION &
PROVIDE FIRE TRUCK
TURN - AROUND IN
SHORELINE AREA
18200 OLYMPIC AVE. SOUTH
EPIC 3 -88
AFFIDAVIT
JOANNE JOHNSON
0 Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet
J Board of Appeals Agenda Packet
[[ Planning Commission Agenda Packet
O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet
OF DISTRIBUTION
hereby declare that:
XC Determination of Nonsignificance
Q Mitigated Determination of Non-
significance
J Determination of Significance
and Scopin.g Notice
0 Notice of Action
O Official Notice
[[ Notice of Application for 0 Other
Shoreline Management Permit
j Shoreline Management Permit 0 Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
AL CROONQUIST
C/0 ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS
600 UNIVERSITY STREET SUITE 2520
SEATTLE, WA 98101
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
SHORELANDS DIVISION
MAIL STOP PV -11
OLYMPIA, WA 98504
ATTN: KAREN BEATTY
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TUKWILA
RECORD CHRONICLE
Name of Project /j,�%0J -3
File Number Uui; :? '5(4,/ 7 •
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1988
Signatur,
LEG.L DESCRIPTION
Legal Description of Lot 22, Southcenter South'Industrial Park.
That portion of Lots 14 and 15 of the plat of Southcenter South Industrial Park as
recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, pages 22, 2.3, 24 and 25 in King County, Washington
described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 15;
Thence N 11 °23'50" E along the west line of. said Lot 15 a distance of 698.25 feet;
Thence N 78 036'16" W a distance of 30.00 feet;
Thence along a curve to. the right, the center of which bears S 78 936'10" E having a
radius of 110.00 feet an arc distance of 89.57 feet through a central angle of
46 °39'19" to the true point of beginning;
Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 119.49 feet;
Thence N 11 °23'50" E a distance of 846.14 feet to the north boundary of said Lots
14 and 15;
Thence along said north boundary of Lots 14 and 15 with the following bearings and
distances:. S 75 045'00" E11.44 feet; S 56 °11'00" E 99.00 feet; S 44 026'00" E 100.00
feet; S 37 °39'00" E 65.30 feet;
Thence N 78 °36'10" W a distance of 40.00 feet;
Thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 116.00 feet; an arc distance of.'
83.22 feet through a central angle of 43°20'4 1" to the true point of beginning.
Containing 183,094 square feet of 4.203 acres.
WAC 197 -11 -970
Description of Proposal
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
IMPROVE PARKING LOT AND PROVIDE FIRE TRUCK
TURN - AROUND IN SHORELINE AREA.
Proponent ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any EAST AND NORTH OF
BUILDING 447 OF THE SOUTHCENTER SOUTH BUSINESS PARK, 18200 OLYMPIC AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWILA. WA 98188.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -3 -88
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
[[ There is no comment period for this DNS
El
This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
MARCH 1, 1988 . The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title Planning Director
Address
Phone 433 -1846
6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukw • 4'1'98 :8
Signature
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM
PERMIT NUMBER
CONTROL NUMBER
89 / -fiy,•
e e -, -,ac /f-
EP /e. - 3.89
TO: 0 BLDG. [j PLNG. P.W. [J FIRE [I POLICE ❑ P. & R.
ROJECT ga402/ZG 'q7 BOV,u4a, Citre P r
C?r ` 0 Sho/e%i,Le - /°eski
ADDRESS /? 2 0 0 0/y »,r oic Arch L/e f .,L j. ' 1 /4 u t-/ ' Q %4 ,��4if .t.0 P6V
DATE TRANSMITTED VQ dd✓ RESPONSE REQUESTED BY �/,/8e (4Rc .e'J 7
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR / ecca_ #Z x RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE
SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH
YHAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
❑�j P /e sc. h0T ,ieJ7-- 4,,<x- /0,0/04'7> 710 ue
❑ )oar y /D / <d/;/
❑ Of .1 JYrore /in c Perri _ P.te,re
❑ 7 --tp "D2x)p1 o IT,1� w�LL c Gu IbTT 1 L_C Crt-/
O U3 s3L- W\A- kNi s V&\1 Lt DCOVI
Q
III ')\Iv L P'Mk \\--rdtur»s i l v y. o ' ['
❑ r -1 tiro cow v L wv cv R-i coIlin
LJ c » L a o\iv N ,s 'M,\y oV, , OM 0/ 5 Lrw
❑ I�- LA scll P L`' IA* 11�-- f�Y1Z( 1 `���1t tp "f111 itf)t79-
O �i(\, S�- . \l - . pooy. r L LL. 6 i? --EOLI a-0 -
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED J
PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED J
PLAN APPROVED J
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. FORM 2
-„IITY OF TUKWILA
PERMIT NUMBER CONTROL NUMBER
BS / -J,%P
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - ROUTING FORM 9g-i_trc�-
FP /c -3. t38
TO: 0 BLDG. Q PLNG. Q P.W. [[ FIRE 0 POLICE 0 P. & R.
O
ROJ E CT gv/0/rtt y9 7 7 Bogezday Litr c ,t OA' Sh oie %H.e �,esk.,i ri
ADDRESS / ?200 O/p../0/ ,vrnvC fa /' C t or-pv0,44 i,t4'/h'»c
DATE TRANSMITTED V;e1//d6 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .2. /,./Aye Cm(' 0.,e0„6,2„,
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR keCc-,A_A )‹ RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE
SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH
HAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
Q f/eucc nor fhrex- ikng c_ �,r .� ,v ti a e re
o joy 7 /V/(d/fl/ e-o00_
Otats fho, a /ice "eJ- ,?,/ ro•Le.Ce./
Q
Q
Q
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
a
0
Q
0
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0
PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUESTED 0
PLAN APPROVED LJ
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. FORM 2
RECE 'VED
CITY OF TUKWILA
FEB , 988
BUILDING Off.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Control No.
-fy/�
Epic File No. %`P /L -3 -88
Fee $100.00 Receipt No./4:96:7
A. BACKGROUND Parking Lot Addition
Building 447
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Southcenter South Industrial Park
2. Name of applicant: Alfred Croonquist Architects
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person ?l Russell
Alfred Croonquist Architects, 600 University Street, Seattle, WA 98101 682 -2690
4. Date checklist prepared: 02/01/88
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Complete construction as soon as possible (Target April 1, 1988).
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Parking stalls may be added along the east.side of the access driveway as
part of a future development to the east.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
None pending
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Boundary line adjustment
Shoreline Development Permit
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi .
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no .
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
This parking lot addition along the east side of Building 447 includes 55 paved
and striped parking stalls on the property and a paved access driveway T cawed
in an easement adjacent to the property. A storm drainage system wiTT- e5
provided. Landscaping will be included.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
;available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
18200 Olympic Avenue South, Tukwila; located in Southcenter South Industrial
Park; Vicinity map and legal description attached.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
Yes. Part of the project i. within the Shnr line znne.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 1%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Primarily silty sands.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. Minimal fill of imported pit run
sand and ravel to bring site to level of adjacent
l existing) parking lot.
f.• Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
70% of designated site.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
None
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Typical construction dust.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
None
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
Green River is adjacent to the she.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
Part of the parking lot will be within 200 feet
of the river.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
None
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
Yes.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
No.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
None
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Stormwater runoff will be collected into an
engineered storm drainage system.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
)( grass
_ pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
Grass will be stripped from site.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
Landscaping will include trees and shrubs.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle,
other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Field mice
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
None.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
The site is within the Green River Valley which
• is part of a natural habitat for migrating birds.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
None.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, soltr) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? list other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
None
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
None
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
None
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
None
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
Temporary noise from construction equipment.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
None
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
Adjacent uses include warehouses, offices and
associated parking.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
Yes, the site is in the Green River Valley which
had been used for Agriculture in the past.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Warehouse
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site?
CM (formerly M -1)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Light industrial
9.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? Urban
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
The site is adjacent to the Green River.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
None
•
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if .any:
None
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income
housing?
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
None
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Parking lot (at grade)
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
Landscaping will be provided.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
None
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Natural recreation related to the Green River.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing .
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The site is within Southcenter South Industrial Park,
adjacent to West Valley Highway.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
Metro stops on West Valley Highway.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
55 spaces added, 29 eliminated; net gain 26.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
None
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
None
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
No
16. Utilities
a. C' utiliti currently available the site:
natural gas, (water3) refuse service,
anitary sewer, septic system, oth&
Storm sewer
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Storm drainage system will be included.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
r
02/88
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1.. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
No change
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
None
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
No effect
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
None
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
No .change
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural'resourses are:
None
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
No impact
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
None
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
No effect
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
None
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
Will meet zoning code criteria
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
No effect
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
None
. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
,No conflict
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
No
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
None
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
To provide adequate parking for Building 447
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
No suitable alternatives have been found.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
N/A
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
No conflict
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
None
-23-