The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-05-89 - KEHLE DAVID - TIME DC PHASE I AND II DEMOLITIONTIME D.C. DEMOLITION PHASE 1 &II - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDING 48T" AVE. S. & INTERURBAN AVE. S. EPIC 5 -89 CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 459 -6000 May 23, 1989 Mr. Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila Planning 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: fir ,'I:, MAY 251999 On May 19, 1989 we sent comments to you concerning the fuel tank removal and cleanup operations at the Time D. C. site by Bedford Properties. Since that time we have received addi- tional comments from our Shorelands and Coastal Zone Manage- ment Program, as follows. 1. From the information provided, it appears that the pro- posed project will require a shoreline substantial develop- ment permit, and the incinerator may require a shoreline conditional use permit under WAC 173 -14- 030(4) and 140(2). Also, the total proposal must be included in the required shoreline permit application. This would include installa- tion of the soil incinerator, any retaining walls or new tanks, and any filling or regrading for future development. (The checklist and site plans are confusing as to what is in- tended in this regard.) G. The proposed project must be consistent with all appli- cable policies and other provisions of the Shoreline Manage- ment Act, its rules, and the local shoreline master program. This includes, but is not limited to, those master program provisions pertaining to commercial and /or industrial devel- opment, landfill, and the Urban shoreline environment. Every effort should be taken to prevent water and air pollution in the process of cleanup (which should only proceed in accor- dance with all necessary permits and approvals.) If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bruce Smith at (206) 459 -6762. DJ B : cc: Linda Rankin Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section `e RIS,TINE O. GREGOIRE Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • May 19, 1898 Mr. Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila Planning 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: % (206) 459 -6000 I MAY 23 1989 11 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the fuel tank removal and area cleanup of the Time D. C. site (file EPIC- 5 -89). We reviewed the en- vironmental checklist and have the following comments. 1. Concerning question B.1.h., erosion control must be in place before erosion occurs, not after it is observed. 2. In reference to question 3.c.1., a sediment collection or detention system (silt screens, detention ponds, hay bales, etc.) should be installed to prevent turbid water from enter- ing the storm drain system or otherwise leaving the site. 3. There are new tank closure requirements in the federal rules for underground storage tanks. These requirements in- clude (1) a site assessment to determine whether contamina- tion has occurred, and (2) filing of a notice of intent to permanently close the tank with the Department of Ecology at least 30 days prior to closure. Information on the closure notice may be obtained by calling 1- 800 - 826 -7716. 4. The Environmental Protection Agency's minimum require- ments are that closure of underground storage tanks must be accompanied by sampling for contamination in the excavation area. The presence of contaminated soils or ground water, or the presence of free product, requires notification of the Department of Ecology within 24 hours. Please call Mr. Joe Hickey of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867 -7202. He will identify the type of testing that will be required. Q5 The Environmental Protection Agency requires the results of an excavation zone assessment be maintained at least three years after completion of permanent closure or change -in- service. Ecology recommends the records be kept in the prop- erty file indefinitely for any future property transfers. • Letter to Rick Beeler May 19, 1989 Page 2, These records should be maintained by successive owners to fulfill liability requirements under the Washington Model Toxics Act, Initiative 97. 6. If any contamination is found at the site, either con- taminated soils or ground water, the Department of Ecology must be contacted within 24 hours. Please call Mr. Joe Hickey of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867 -7202. 7. If storage tanks contain dangerous or hazardous wastes as defined in WAC 173 -303, please contact the Northwest Regional Office, Solid and Hazardous Waste Section, at (206) 867 -7000 for closure requirements. 8. Please have the proponent identify how and where the re- moved contaminated material(s) will be disposed of. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Joe Hickey (206- 867 -7202) or Mr. Dan Cargill (206- 867 -7023) of Ecology's Northwest Regional Office. DJ B : cc: Rachel Friedman - Thomas Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 April 27, 1989 David Kehle Bedford Properties 12878 Interurban Ave. So. Seattle, Wa. 98168 Subject: Demolition Time D.C. Dear David, I have enclosed the application information for the excavation permit for the clean -up of the Time D.C. Site. There is no application form, therefore a letter with the necessary information and plans should be submitted. I have outlined specific requirements in yellow. The fee for this process is 100.00 dollars. The SEPA determination is awaiting the geotechnical report and air emmission information for the incinerater from PSACA. I have outlined specific requirements in yellow. The fee for This process is 100.00 dollars. Questions regarding this matter can be made by contacting me at 433 - 1845. Thank You arren wi Assistant Planner cc: Moira Carr Bradshaw • CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT LOCATION DATE TRANSMITTED STAFF COORDINATOR • CN EPIC FILE BLDG 0 PLNG P.W. [ FIRE 0 POLICE n P & R 71/69,/e///-#9 • FILE NO. 4Y,d 5 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT , \/( aorYlr1 [NT5 DATE 3 ipft COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM MAR 29 1989 EPIC FILE ?ihR5e,_ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM r='`'` TO: PROJECT LDG j PLNG P.W. FIRE (i POLICE n P & R LOCAT ION '&'i A79YC4/1 �� DATE TRANSMITTED 8 716(0_411/ C/g STAFF COORDINATOR FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT 4/ OA com /e tun 1iis 4 /00X 7 A) o� i w� Axe-, i 0 ice o,- , : ') &Mhrite,ste&e iewd,F reric ce g4t .2) /, 4e, z Ze.c.ox 4 eirc61 ,3) , edepd - /lo d? ,4 4 7"Xt. •-/e )4-10,7,a (//4eirm,deezhteegi-0/, z/cg, Wee. , G , a1 of ,a te /246ki ee 7 x (9)` fr'h Asigult , h'2440,82-/L__-4-wiegt: f4101/Ldillti9C/S-4 DATE :.q7y4/0 COMMENTS PREPARED BY �. C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG PROJECT LOCATION ri PLNG CN EPIC FILE 7h45 n P.W. ri FIRE n POLICE n P & R FILE NO. 60e�� 9 DATE TRANSMITTED o 7R 1 n9 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. RESPONSE RECEIVED ITEM COMMENT VI der V11$er J n 60'4 S40 ►r\ el at h )-a� toer ; a",6-6,/ eAa,i/Zi-C„ DATE 3 it P1 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 M6 1"\""l . Co lie 1 No. MAR 2 11989 EpiZ'�ile No .r4(5---g �.- J• Fee $100.00 Receipt No. p-/?‘ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST' A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Er2 . 2. Name of applicant: FORM? 3. Address and hone nu b r of _applicant and contact person: Im�l� I %, i .yea 4. Date checklist prepared: ?j.140'.27q 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Pr••osed train. or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): OA / 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 1/ rid fArif 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be repare , dire ly related to this pro'osa �t wL h M'L.. ►� 'Ogin.. f 1 Mara rar 1- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. �.p • 1 10. List Any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Kie y r ar-r -Tu vm 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be s arized 'ere. i • ►, , / aiii 1. A it IRO 1 _ +. /i a 1' Ek_LIittE plga 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- t'ons related to his checklist. '4 . . 1-2 _o 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use P licy PPlan/ Map as environmentally sensitive? If- A(0 l/a.bbw ad' U4 ///r1 d/yeafictihcme/a4473 kArzlide, cl)-nye‘ epizogil&7617(/ oindi eni'lnfrk(aid atO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 07X0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, spec fy them and note any prime farmland. �%1. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in tie immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. l� f.• Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, neral,�l,y describe. E�C� ( uU2 UI beret . g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for exampile0 �salt,oN uildii gs�)? Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or o her impacts to the,-arth, if any: di f. - .:._/,' ANWii . 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. {Jb c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts tp air, if any: 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream • river it flows into. • "Of �1 11.€0 acL. • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. V - 4- di • L. ► l u7 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. a 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain ?II If so, note location on the site plan. r4C) 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only (0 '7° r: b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. ND 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are eixp a ted to serve. HOW c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other w 41 11114C1 If so, �ess ri be. �b�fo� a a2 N66( 7 v� icy Q'�11.t2 . Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If sq, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and ruWnDff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: k' deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and mount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Nole c. List threatened or GIggered species known to be on or near the site. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to presQrye or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Aik 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: J0 birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or ndangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site at of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measure s to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: µa Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be u d for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjac/,(,p� ent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 14 A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. /r�� I,0 g;,,6 ate Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Describe spec al emergency services that might be required. j}4 2) Proposed measures to reduce or ontrol environ- ntal health h.zards, if any: • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for exarr)ple: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the sit and adjacent -0— j properties? l tNr7 C ' kl' °01 ocl2 CL b. Has the site Open used for agriculture? If so, describe. - c. Describe any structures on the site. L Ol l . KaardMINEMIIIRMIPM d ✓I `' • 'r% • 0\01°' • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? I 1 11U21A_CI e. What is the current zoning classification, of the lv, site? HH f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Holutu0t.14 If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? U12fbt.1 g. h.. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" ar ? If so, specify. / b 14i11.1 1001 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? E: kl k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce dis lacement impacts, if any:1� 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existi g and projected land uses and plans, if any: 131,1ss' • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? 00. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicat whether high, middle, or low - income housing. E: c. Proposed measures tq reduce or control housing impacts, if any: psq 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal,, exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Noit. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N bi. • 11. Light and Glare • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazardio interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your pr y al? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacl;$)Aif any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the irtmeddiate vicinity? r Wb1-/i -4-i WeI — b. Would the proposed project displace any existing . recreation uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by he project or applicant, if any: • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known be on or next to the site. ,to4 E c. Proposed measuret to reduce or control impacts, if any: �C 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street sysjem. Show on site glans, i f any. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate dist nce to the nearest transit stop? � �R hl L.7. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? 1191 many would the project eliminate? • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 1•104-E g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on p blic services, if any. RiA Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circl utilities currentl telephon • Evaluation for Agency Use Only available at the site: cfuse service septic system, other. ary sewer b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the i ediate vicinity which might be needed. I Ll.- I of,. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I u.'erstand that the lead agency is Signature: on them t• ma- • - i :,g na ture Date Submitted: e.601T PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. :-.TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•T 0. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic„ or hazardous substances; or production of noise? 14j Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: JVA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: IVA Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to proect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 14 ii+ 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplain, or prime far lands? 1 \ V I. %% �j1;5 geAh iC/�ti pia ► Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: I U I4E "1' 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline ses incompatible with existing plans? Pd 1H • 40 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? yi=fj 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection ofther environment. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to void or reduce the conflict(s) are: N ':TO BE COMPLETED BY Apnea • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? ti. &Li 10 i u P_ May a'riTAIRLTrai ltamoorearireurcommAra _'.1111'11___11111 . ► 1a rraZii 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives ?_ t 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred14course of action: • • 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? 0/7 Proposed measures t9 a oid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDI Ross Earnst, Rick Beeler, Tom Keefe an Ron Cameron, City Engineer /*'' November 21, 1988 Demolition Permits A meeting of Phil, Ted, Becky and myself on November 10 to release the Interurban (Crostick) demolition bond was held. It revealed some coordination needs that this memorandum explains. The main idea is to have a demolition check -off list as part of the demolition permit. A check -off list should result in coordination of water service, sewer, finance and traffic control activities affected by a demolition. Demolitions are covered by Ordinance 1393 and approved by the Building Official (16.04.055). Becky is the point person on the permits /requirements. Following are some check -off items needed on the permit: - Plan (drawing). Section 16.04.060 authorizes the Building Official to require plans. Provide a plan (drawing) showing where utility locations will be severed and capped for the inspection of utility work. Both the applicant and the City Inspector need to know where the sewer will be capped and water capped. - Sanitary Sewer. The ordinance spells out that it is to be capped. The proposed capping needs to be aproved. The bond should not be released until the Public Works Inspector has approved the capping of the sewer. - Water Service. Water services need to be capped and needs Public Works approval of the water service work - whether it is at the main or at the meter. The proposed capping needs to be approved. Inspection and approval of the connected work by the Public Works Inspector needs to be complete before release of the bond. Call 433 -1860 (Public Works Shops) for additional help. - Finance. Water, sewer, (and future storm) utility billing deletions need to -6T-removed from the system. Finance approval of this work needs to be complete before bond release. Call 433 -1839, Finance, for additional information (capping services). • Ross Earnst, Rick Beeler, Tom Keefe & Alan Doerschel MEMORANDUM November 21, 1988 Page 2 Traffic Control Plan. A traffic control plan needs to be submitted and approved if the demolition or related utility work is to be performed in the street or walkway areas. Public Works will determine if it is needed. The applicant will submit a plan if it is needed for approval by Public Works. Traffic Control Plans need to be per Chapter 6 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (Here, some sample layouts can be provided). Call 433 -1853 for additional information. Surface Water Drainage. In the event that a control plan is determined to be needed by Public Works, a plan needs to be provided. The Public Works Inspector will approval and inspect for compliance. A Fire Department practice burn results in the same needs as it is a "hot" demolotion. Adding a check -off will allow a specific list of requirements be identified for the permit approval and completion check -off for bond release. It coordinates the various affected activities so the appropriate removals and safety needs are administered for demolitions by contractor or practice burns. The check -off could look like: APPROVED BY: REQUIRED FOR PERMIT DATE INITIAL Plan (Drawing) Sanitary Sewer Storm /Surface Water Sewer Water Service Traffic- Control Plan Surface Water Control Finance Department (utility billings) Other The practice burn donations should still obtain the permit so water, sewer and finance can take the appropriate actions, as does Building by informing the County Assessor that the structure no longer exists. Tom Keefe and Duane Griffin agree with the check -off form and "memorandum" explanation. Duane said that he would add both to a form. Tom said that Fire will send "burn donations" to building for a permit so the records are kept straight. The purpose of this memorandum si to coordinate these activities and help Becky handle the permits. It would assure that each of the activities affected by a demolition are notified and "checked -off" on what is to be done and that is it. RC /kjr CC: Phil Fraser Becky Davis Tom Jensen Duane Griffin Ted Freemire Norm Bray • Brad Williams