HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-05-90 - CELLULAR ONE - TEMPORARY POLECELLULAR ONE -
TEMPORARY 90' POLE
NE CORNER OF
LONGACRES WAY
(S. 158T ") & NELSEN PL.
EPIC -5 -90
WAC 197 -11 -970
•
MITIGATED
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal SOUTHCENTER CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS IS PROPOSING TO PLACE
A TEMPORARY 90' POLE (WOODEN) WITH 15' OMNI - DIRECTIONAL WHIP ANTENNAS AND INSTALL
8_12' X 15' ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT TRAILER.
Proponent INTERSTATE MOBILEPHONE COMPANY (CELLULAR ONE)
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any NORTHEAST CORNER OF LONGACRES
WAY (S. 158TH) AND NELSEN PLACE.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-5 -90
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
0 There is no comment period for this DNS
Q This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
MARCH 26, 1990 . The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Address
Date
Rick Beeler
Planning Director
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukw_agtof A 98188
Q Signature` %� •),.
Phone 433 -1846
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
March 9, 1990
Cellular One EPIC -5 -90 (Temporary)
Mitigation Determination of Nonsignificance
SEPA Conditions:
1. No protest drainage LID Agreement is required with the
temporary tower; No protest agreement to be rescinded if
temporary facility is removed, within one year of
construction.
2.B.. Based on the soils report prepared by Rittenhouse -Zeman &
Associates, Inc. Geotechnical & Environmental Consultants,
dated January 11, 1990, recommend for deeper foundation
support of the building /tower.
C. All piles should be driven under the full time observation
of the soils engineer and pile capacity should be confirmed
with an appropriate dynamic pile driving formula.
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EfVVIROiVIU NTAL REVIEW
FtOUT11tG FORM
PROJECTeek e,72e,
EPIC: -s-=76
ADDRESS.5���7f7 / ,1t /-
DATE TRANSMITTED zz�� RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 2ATAD
STAFF COORDINATOR, ZdIS-Ar2 DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM
COMMENT
G9
se
Date: Comments prepared by: ,
09/14/89
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ROUTING FORM
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EPIC: -
E . • E • IN' jki
TO Budding _ Planning _ Pub Wks Fire El Police fl Parks/Rec
PROJECT////.
ADDRESS --j?,:/ ‘t; :43 <5/ (/ /,/ //
DATE TRANSMITTED RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR /Dge,,?, ' v.)) DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination:: The
environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning .Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM
COMMENT
,454 . 1/Se. esotc) 54.-ne
'f 422/2
/5 — /04,64, £O44) 4) -
a A 0 ,,,artazhvw- trial ,62.-„AelgiAget 4 4a, .464/4 2i4,1&04-
71M et4- d2ieew . Aa,z2,e1,ze-A
_./Y-f/a-aeol 4 4 _ iferntA
Date: ,207/q0 Comments prepared b.y: ,
09/14/e
ENVIRON ,NTAL REVIEW
ROUTMG FORM
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EPIC:
TO:
E Building ° fl Planning,
Pub Wks P6Fire
Police f Parks /Rec
PROJECT C A4 S
ADDRESS in* zs-g S 9' ,pe.j_57Y7 "I
DATE TRANSMITTED �7„00 RESPONSE REQUESTED BYlog`y--0
STAFF COORDINATOR ) /9.e zek2seY! DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project.. Please review and .
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM COMMENT
2,//i
/%. < 2 Gov e - - 72
e0211/6e72,372
Date: Comments prepared by: ,
091,4/89
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIHUNIVIEN I'AL HEVIEW
ROUTOIG FORM
.DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TQ: Ei Building El Planning
tf
PROJECT
ADDRESS,--52-6,/7 %S.j'-&-. 'X (;z. /!C /4-
DATE TRANSMITTED
EPIC:
Fire [J Police [ Parks /Rec
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY
STAFF COORDINATOR L),l)/rt.
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file Is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator.. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM
TEMPORARY SEPA
COMMENT
P.2 - #10 - ADD: Flood Control Zone Permit
Drainage Permit
Access Permit
Developer's Agreement - Participation in
future storm drainage L.I.D. -per Longacres/
Nelsen Place basin study and preliminary
engineering design report.
No protest drainage LID Agreement is required
with temporary tower; No protest agreement to
be rescinded if temporary facility is removed,
within one year of construction completion.
P.5 -3,A,1 - ADD: This site lies within the flood plain of the
P -1 channel (all structures on the site will
meet conditions of the City's Flood
Ordinance). Regional ditch systems serving
adjacent and upstream properties traverse
through the south and east side of the
development. Converting the temporary
facility to permanent will require improve-
ments to the east and south ditches .AHD at RE
cvu1A!'D AT 1 HZ -TIME oP 'T1tQ e."w'IlSIv*/ UN A-- Luts• (An / 4 t$r„ PL . MAR., Pitie
P.6 -3,A,5 Non- responsive: NGVD datum and lowest floor 4`TiO1t6'
elevation required to make this determination
along with review of F.I.R.M. and latest /best
information. Provide these elevations and then
respond to question.
P.6 -3,A,6 No oil /water separator nor swale system shown on
plans. Without addressing water treatment from
site answer for this proposal is "yes ". Please
address.
N\
P.6 -3,C,1
P.7 - 2
19
All impervious service site improvements, including
driveway and building structure (with oil base
roofing) which are oil or other contaminant
producing surfaces require at minimum,an oil /water
sparator,prior to discharge into a downstream
storm drainage system.
Yes - Identify temporary and permanent erosion
control facilities to protect ditches and down-
stream storm system.
P.14 - d Provide or describe
this development is
the intersection of
Nelsen Place and S.
•
•
on plans the easements by which
allowed access from the site to
the public rights -of -way at
158th Street to the southwest.
Date: 3---C L2
Comments prepared by: ,
09/14/89
-
SCTRTEMP.WPS
1/31/90
CITY OF TUKWILA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
•
Environmental Checklist
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Southcenter Cellular Communications Site,
Temporary Facility
2. Name of applicant:
Interstate Mobilephone Company
d /b /a Cellular One
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact
person:
Gary Wayne
Cellular One
101 Elliott Ave, Suite 435
Seattle, WA 98109
283 -8319
Nancy A. Ryan
Aippersbach & Ryan
2122 222nd Place NE
Redmond, WA 98053
4. Date checklist prepared: January 29, 1990
5. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Tukwila, Community Development Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if
applicable):
Temporary Site Construction - 1 -2 weeks
7. Do you have any plans for future additions,
expansion, or further activity related to or connected
with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, The applicant will apply to place a permanent
communication facility at the same site. The
temporary facility will be removed once the
permanent facility is operational. An environmental
checklist for the permanent facility will be
provided with the application for the permanent cell
site.
8. List any environmental information you know about
that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
A soils analysis has been prepared by Rittenhouse
Zeman Associates, dated January 11, 1990. (See
Exhibit A).
9. Do you know whether applications are pending
for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
The City is in the process of forming a utility
local improvement district for improvements to storm
drainage along Longacres Way (SE 58th).
10. List any government approvals or permits that will
be needed for your proposal, if known.
Temporary Use approval
Conditional Use approval for the Permanent Facility
FAA permit is NOT required (See Exhibit B)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal,
including the proposed uses and the size of the project
and site. There are several' questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of
your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers
on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to
include additional specific information on project
description.)
Place a 90' pole (wooden) with 15 ' omni- directional
(whip) antennas and install a 12'x28' electronic
equipment trailer. The approximate 9,075 square
foot lease area (121'x 75') will be cleared of
vegetation (including trees, and graded. An
approximately 6' high security fence will surround
the site. The graded area inside the fence will be
finished with gravel. Perimeter shrub plantings
will be provided, outside the fence to screen the
equipment trailer and base of the pole. The
temporary pole will remain only as long as necessary
to complete approval of a permanent cell site
facility.
The permanent cell site will occur at the same
location. A permanent tower and equipment shelter
•
will be part of the permanent site. The
environmental information related to the permanent
site will be provided in an environmental checklist
which will accompany the permanent site application
to the City of Tukwila.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient
information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if
known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,
provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide
a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic may, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are
not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
Northeast corner of Longacres Way (S. 158th) and
Nelsen Place, in the vicinity of Southcenter.
Located in an area of industrial development near
Longacres.
The site lies directly west of (the raised grade)
Union Pacific railroad right of way, and the
entrance to Longacres Racetrack.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on
the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as
environmentally sensitive.
No.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Valley
floor.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)?
Less than 2% on site. East of the site is an
approximately 15' high railroad embankment.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils. specify
them and note any prime farmland.
The property is largely developed. The existing
warehouse building covers 19% of the property with
impervious surface. A portion of the lease area has
• •
been filled with approximately 12 to 18 inches of
sandy gravel.
The soils report indicates that subsurface soils
consist of 23 feet of generally loose sands and very
soft silt underlain by medium dense to dense sands.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No surface indications of unstable soils are
present. Based on subsurface conditions identified
in the soils report, shallow foundation support of
the equipment trailer would not be considered
feasible unless some risk of settlement could be
tolerated. Deep foundation support (driven piles)
is recommended in the soils analysis.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate
quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
Some clearing will occur to remove grass and shrubs.
Clearing /structural fill (see soils report) for
preparation of pole and equipment trailer
installation.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Minimal, approximately 9,075 square feet of area
will be cleared and graded. Storm water is expected
to sheet flow to a small drainage swale at the
eastern edge of the site or to be absorbed into the
ground. The site is flat, and not susceptible to
erosion by its topography. If erosion does occur
during construction, straw bales or other erosion
control materials will be placed at the edge of the
property line to filter out any sediments that
result from construction.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt, or buildings)?
The temporary facilities will introduce
approximately 350 square feet of impervious surface
for the trailer and base for the pole. The balance
of the site will be covered with gravel, shrubs and
grasses. The existing warehouse building covers
7,125 square feet of the 38,013 square foot
property. The Cellular facility will add 350
additional square feet of impervious surface for a
total coverage of 20% square feet of the entire
• •
property. The Cellular facility adds less than a 1%
increase in the impervious surface.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
Typical erosion and sedimentation control measures
(hay bail or other appropriate materials) will be
implemented in accordance with City regulations for
the building permit.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial
wood smoke) during construction and when the project is
completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
Light vehicular traffic during 4 -5 weeks of
construction period. Approximately 1 trip per week
(4 vehicle trips per month)generated by the
facility.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
None.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year —round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,
state what stream or river it flows into.
The Green River is located about one quarter mile
west of the site. The site does not lie within the
floodway or floodplain of this river.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that
would be placed in or removed from surface water or
wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be
affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Not applicable.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals
or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and
approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 —year floodplain?
If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste
materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of
waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into
the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any
(for example: Domestic Sewage; industrial, containing
the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of
such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the
system(s) are expected to serve.
None. No waste material is produced by the
proposal. The site will be unmanned, thus no water
or sanitary sewage service is required.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water
flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,
describe.
Negligible runoff will result from the addition of
approximately 350 square feet of impervious area
around the base of the temporary pole and under the
6
equipment trailer. There is an undefined drainage
swale at the eastern edge of the site, which
connects to a 12" CMP storm pipe running under S.
158th Street (Longacres Way). The City of Tukwila
is initiating a ULID that will install storm
drainage improvements along the north side of S.
158th Street (which will along the southern boundary
of this site. The proposed plans call for a 36 inch
storm drain line to be placed approximately 5' north
of the centerline of S. 158th. The existing 12"
pipe will be plugged and the water diverted into the
new 36" storm drain.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
No waster materials will be generated on the
proposed site.
d. Proposed measures.to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None, appear to necessary, given the extent of
improvements already planned by the City's ULID.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site:
x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:cottonwood
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
x grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
x other types of vegetation: Blackberry
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or
altered?
The construction of the pole and installation of the
equipment trailer will require the removal of
grasses, trees and berry vines and shrubs. The
structures will require removal of existing
cottonwood trees for safety reasons.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
Landscaping will be placed around the perimeter of
the cellular facility after construction is
complete. The proposed landscaping will be shrubs
(as identified on the site plan) for screening the
fence and equipment.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed
on or near the site or are known to be on or near the
site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ongbire[�, other:
mammals: dear, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
The site is in an urbanized industrial area.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be
on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
Not known.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if
any:
Not applicable.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electrical, natural gas, wood
stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electrical. The pole will require 20 -40 watt
service. There will be two whip antennas located on
the top of the temporary pole. Electricity and
telephone service for electronic equipment will be
necessary.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy impacts, if any:
No. The temporary pole's will not obstruct sunlight
from other structures.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if
any?
None.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including
exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,
spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result
of this proposal? If so, describe.
No materials that could cause fire or explosion
area known Cellular radio power density levels are
regulated by government as a potential environmental
concern. A permanent cell site (100 foot pole, with
panel, whip and microwave antennas) will generate less
than t'o 10 microwatts per square centimeter at an
elevation of 52 feet from the antennas. This temporary
facility proposed would have only 2 whip antennas. The
power density levels, thus would be even less. By
comparison, the EPA sets 2,000 microwatts per square
centimeter as an acceptable level.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be
required.
None.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any:
None.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other):
None. This is a light industrial district fully
developed. The existing noises will not affect this
project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by
or associated with the project on a short -term or a long-
term basis (for example: traffic, construction,
operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Minimal traffic during the 1 -2 week construction
period.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
Hours of construction will be limited to between
7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
The property currently contains an office /warehouse
(Rawson Drugs) which a square foot building.
North - retail, warehouse /office
(Mueller Brass, and )
South - vacant, undeveloped
East - right of way (Union Pacific), Longacres
West - PSLP transmission easement, retail (Daniel
Boone Paint), warehouse /office /retail
(Service America Corporation)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
One building exists on the site outside the lease
area. It is approximately 7,125 square feet and is
office /warehouse use (Rawson Drugs).
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site?
M -1 (Light Industrial).
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of
the site?
Light Industrial.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
Not applicable.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in
the completed project?
None. This site will be unmanned. Semi - monthly
maintenance visits will involve one person.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
None.
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is
compatible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
The surrounding land uses are older industrial
buildings and electrical power poles and lines. The
pole and trailer will be compatible with these uses.
Some new construction is also taking place along the
West Valley Highway, not far west of the site. The
proposed pole will not be significantly visible
along West Valley Highway when the new construction
is complete, because the site was located far enough
from the highway that the buildings will shield it
from view.
m. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and
land use impacts are:
None.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing.
Not applicable.
b. Approximately how may units, if any, would be
eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing.
Not applicable.
•
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
Not applicable.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The height of the temporary pole will not exceed
105'. The pole itself will be is 90 feet with 15'
whip antenna. The pole will be treated wood. The
equipment trailer will be under 10 feet.
The Puget Power transmission pole adjacent to the
site is about 110 feet high, according the Puget
Power.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered
or obstructed?
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
Vegetative screening will be provided around the
perimeter of the cell site (just outside of the
proposed security fence). Both the temporary pole
and the trailer are not out of character with the
immediate industrial area. The temporary facility
is only temporary and will be replaced by a proposed
permanent tower and equipment shelter.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None. The height of the pole was filed with an FAA
approval (FAA study number 89 ANM- 0993 -0E) and the
height does not require special lighting. No other
light will be generated by the proposal.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
None are anticipated to be necessary.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational
opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Not applicable.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or
proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
Not applicable.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
Longacres Way ('South 158th) and Nelsen Place serve
the site directly. West Valley Highway, State Route
405, and Interstate 5 all serve the area surrounding
the site.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,
what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
Yes, Metro routes 150 and 124 serve this area.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
The project will require no parking spaces and will
not eliminate any existing parking on the site. The
semi - monthly maintenance visits will require one car
to be parked in the existing parking area with no
adverse impacts.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate
whether public or private).
No. Nelsen Place is a private road with no
driveways delineated.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
The site will not require these transportation
means. There is an existing Union Pacific Railway
right of way to the east of the site.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak
volumes would occur.
One vehicle, semi - monthly.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any:
None will be required as a result of low impact by
proposed construction.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
No. The equipment trailer is unmanned with self -
extinguishing fire protection (halon system). the
equipment shelter and pole are alarmed and monitored
24 hours a day by an operations center.
• •
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts
on public services, if any.
None are anticipated to be necessary.
16. Utilities
a. e utilities currently available at the site:
, natural gas, water, refuse service,
sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Electricity — Puget Power
Telephone — U.S. West Communications
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying
on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of
reaching the objective for a proposal will be helpful in
reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental
Checklist. This information provides a general overall
perspective of the proposed action in the context of the
environmental information provided and the submitted
plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
The goals of the proposal are:
o to provide improved cellular service (reducing
or eliminating bouts of interrupted service) in
the area of the confluence of I -5, I -405 and
the Valley Freeway.;
o to provide critical coverage of both existing
mobile telephone service subscribers ( which
includes the Tukwila Fire Department) and
Goodwill Games users. Cellular One is
providing security cellular telephone service
for the Goodwill Games. This site will also
provide service for the Sea -Tac airport, where
athletes, officials and dignitaries for the
Goodwill Games will be arriving and departing;
o to locate both the temporary facility and the
permanent facility on the same site, and remove
the temporary once the permanent cell site is
activated. An exhaustive search of 76 parcels
were contacted to ultimately find this needed
site.
2. What the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
Alternatives means to these objectives are not,
currently available.
Cell sites area oriented geographically in a
hexagonal grid pattern. Each cell base station is
located a certain distance from neighboring cell
base sites sot that it will provide service to a
specific geographic area, based on multiple factors
including; traffic distribution. topographical
features, radio interference concerns and quality.
• •
Accordingly, cell site locations are
characteristically located in areas where the cell
site is nearby to freeways or heavily travelled
arterials, where the line —of —sight between roadway
and cell site is minimally obstructed, and
preferable away from hilltops and other prominent
land features where radio towers are typically
located to avoid intersystem interference. To
provide system coverage in densely populated areas,
the search for a cell base site is quite small,
often one —half mile or less in diameter, depending
upon topographical factors, i.e. the presence of
valleys, hills, bodies of water which either stop of
extend radio coverage causing either a loss of
service or a "skipping of radio propagation for long
distances and thus destroying service by causing
intersystem interference.
The confluence of multiple freeways such as exists
in Tukwila (I -5, I -405, and the Valley Freeway) is a
key factor in locating effective cell sites ans
providing quality transmission and service. Much
like the growth pressure experienced from new
businesses locating in Tukwila, McCaw Cellular
Communications is experiencing increased public
demand for cellular telephone service. There are
approximately 50,000 cellular users in the Seattle
area. This number is doubling every two and one —
half years. In the Tukwila area, the net result of
the increased demand is the rapidly worsening bouts
of interrupted service in this area.
The proposed facility is essential to the public
need. The location of this cell site will provide
critical communication coverage to both the existing
mobile telephone service subscribers (which includes
the Tukwila Fire Department) and the Goodwill Games
users.
In addition to technical factors, Mc Caw must also
located property owners within the search areas
which are willing to accept cell site facilities on
their properties. For this site, one hundred and
forth eight (148) parcels were identified in the
search area and of the 148, 76 were further
identified as being suitable. Each of the 76 were
contacted and negotiations began. Once negotiations
were concluded for this site, drive tests were
conducted to ensure suitability of the site.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate
the preferred course of action.
Given the in -depth search for a suitable location,
no alternative to the proposal will achieve the
objectives. The preferred course of action is the
proposal.
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the
Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what
policies of the plan.
There are no specific goals and policies of the
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan which address this type
of utility. However, the proposal does improve the
overall cellular system by increasing cpacity and
providing the users with the Tukwila area with
inproved quality of service which is a general goal
of the Comprehensive Plan for the Transportation/
Utility Element of the Plan.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are:
No conflict will occur.
SCTRTEMP.WPS
1/30/90
RZA
RITTENHOUSfPEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical & Environmental Consultants
1400 140th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98005 -4594
(206) 746. 8020 /lAX (206) 746 -6364
11 January 1990
Cellular One
101 Elliott Avenue, Suite 435
Seattle, Washington 98109
Attention: Mr. Al Mastroianni, Project Manager
Subject: Limited Geotechnical Engineering Study
Proposed Communications Tower
Tukwila, Washington
Gentlemen:
W-6565
This letter presents the results of our subsurface exploration and limited geotechnical
engineering study conducted for the above referenced project. The scope of work for
this study was conducted per our proposal, P-3329.
Verbal authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Al Mastroianni, of
Cellular One on 4 December 1989. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use
of Cellular One and their agents for specific application to this project in accordance with
generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices.
The site is located on the southeast corner of South 158th Street and Longacres Way in
Tukwila, Washington as shown on our Site Vicinity Map, Figure 1. The site is relatively
level. To the east of the site is an approximately 15 foot high railroad embankment, and
to the north is an existing concrete building. Most of the site is vegetated with bushes
and weeds with trees in the eastern half of the site. No standing surface water was
observed across the site at the time of our field studies.
We understand that a 100 -foot high transmission tower is to be built on the site
supported by a monopole. A small equipment building is to be built immediately
adjacent to the self- supported tower.
Exhibit A
to Environmental Checklist
Cellular One
11 January 1990
W-6565
Page 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
One test boring was advanced to a total depth of 49 feet on 14 December 1989. The
location of the boring is shown on the attached Site and Exploration Man, Figure 2.
Drilling was performed using a truck - mounted hollow -stem auger. Samples were
obtained using the Standard Penetration Test Procedure as determined in ASTM :D -
1586. The samples collected were taken to our laboratory for visual classification. The
log for this boring is presented at the end of this letter report.
The soils encountered in our boring consisted of interbedded loose to medium dense
sands and very soft silts and clays all underlain by medium dense to dense sands. From
the ground surface, we encountered approximately 1 foot of topsoil above a 5 foot layer
of medium dense silty sand, underlain by approximately 12 feet of interbedded very soft
sandy silt to organic silty clay. Below the interbedded silt /clay layer for approximately 5
feet was a loose sand with some silt. At 23 feet below the ground surface, the sand
graded to medium dense. A medium dense to dense sand with some silt and gravel was
encountered to the bottom of our boring at 49 feet.
Groundwater was encountered at approximately 10 feet below the ground surface at the
time of drilling. No observation well was installed in the boring. Groundwater levels may
vary with changes in precipitation, season, the stage of the nearby Green River, site
utilization, and other factors.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The proposed project consists of a 100 -foot self supported monopole tower and
associated building in Tukwila, Washington. The subsurface conditions disclosed by our
boring, consisted of 23 feet of generally loose sands and very soft silt, underlain by
medium dense to dense sands at depth. Based on the observed subsurface conditions,
shallow foundation support of the equipment building would not be considered feasible
unless the risk of some settlement could be tolerated. Recommendations for deep
foundation support of the building and the tower are presented.
Cellular One • •
W-6565
11 January 1990 Page 3
Our subsurface exploration disclosed a near - surface 5 -foot thick layer of medium dense
(N =12) sand, underlain by 12 feet of very soft silt and clay. Because of the presence of
these relatively loose sands underlain by compressible silts and clays, significant
settlements may occur as a result of the increased loading. Based on our boring made
for this project and other borings made in the vicinity, we estimate settlements of 1 to 3
inches may occur as a result of an imposed loading of 1500 pounds per square foot on a
conventional 15 inch footing embedded 1.5 feet below the ground surface.' If the risk of
some settlement could be tolerated, partial removal of soils beneath footing elevation
and replacement with a structural fill could be considered. The greater the depth of soil
beneath the footings which are removed and replaced with structural fill, the more
settlement would occur as broad gentle warping rather than sharp, discontinuous
breaks. You have indicated that such settlements would not be acceptable,
We would therefore recommend utilizing a deep foundation system for supporting the
small equipment building. In view of the relatively light Toads anticipated for the
equipment building, we believe that treated timber piles would Likely provide an
economical deep foundation system. Based on the boring drilled for this project, a firm
bearing stratum for pile embedment purposes appears to be present at 23 feet below the
ground surface. Timber piles would derive their capacity from a combination of friction
and end - bearing. Treated timber piling with a minimum tip diameter of 8 inches would be
capable of supporting design loads of 20 tons each when driven to a depth of about 35,
feet. Timber piling should be driven with an air, steam, or diesel hammer capable of
delivering 15,000 foot- pounds of energy. All plies should be driven under the full time
observation of the soils engineer and pile capacity should be confirmed with an
appropriate dynamic pile driving formula.
Foundation support for other cellular towers has typically been attained by construction
of drilled piers. Based on our explorations, drilled piers would not be feasible to
construct on this site, due to the high water table. We anticipate the loose sands below
the water table would produce caving in the pier excavations.
. Cellular One
11 January 1990
W-6565
Page 4
Because of severe caving and high groundwater levels, casing the hole would
apparently require dewatering in advance of construction. However dewatering to such
great depths could produce significant settlement in the area, and would therefore not
be advisable. Instead, we would recommend installation of a pile foundation which
would limit disturbance of the soils. Possible deep foundation options would include
augers ast piles or driven timber piles.
The timber pile advantages are low cost and relative ease of installation. The
disadvantages of the timber piles are that uplift capacity will be limited depending on the
depth of penetration into the medium dense to dense stratum that can be achieved. For
augercast'piles the, advantage is that sufficient depth can be obtainedio resist.uplift. The
disadvantage is that the depth of the pile is limited by the,diarneter* used and that it is
„_likely that more concrete will be needed than usual due to the very soft soils near the
{surface!
The previous recommendations for driven piles for the equipment building will also apply
for the tower. The following additional recommendations pertain to the timber piles. The
bearing capacities available in the upper 23 feet of the pile should be neglected. For
frictional resistance, acting both downward and in uplift, we recommend using an
allowable skin friction of 0.2 TSF for that portion of the pile embedded below 23 feet. It is
likely that the timber piles would only be capable of being driven to a maximum depth of
35 feet. Piles should be driven no closer then 3 times the diameter of the pile.
For design of augercast :piles, the following parameters will be applicable. The
daluw Iv' bzd6 it uy c;dpacity for end - bearing capacity Is to D/b 161-- (in
tons per square foot), where D is thA Amherimpnt depth (in feet) into the bearing soil
(below 23 feet) and B is the diameter of pile in feet. The limiting allowable end - bearing
pressures provided may be used for piers embedded at least 8 pier diameters into the
bearing layers. For flictional .resistance, acting both downward and in uplift, we
recommend using an allowable skin friction of 0.1 TSF for that portion of the augercast
'pile embedded below 23 feet. The total length of the augercast pile should be limited to
3Q times the pile diameter.
, Cellular One • W-6565
11 January 1990 Page 5
The response characteristics of a pile or pile group to lateral load depends on the
structural configuration of the pile group. Lateral load capacities are generally governed
by limiting pile deflection at the groundline or top of pile. The deflection will depend on
the pile stiffness with respect to the soil, the length of the pile and degree of fixity at the
pile head. Using the criteria presented subsequently, the deflection at the ground
surface and maximum bending moments produced by a lateral Toad at the top of the pile
can be determined. If very high lateral loads are to be resisted, it may be necessary to
utilize batter piles.
We assume the pile head is fixed against rotation. The lateral capacity which may be
developed by granular soils surrounding the embedded portion of a single pile may be
evaluated by elastic considerations. Parameters which impact this analysis include the
elastic modulus (E) of the pile material, the shape of the pile (as it determines the
moment of inertia (I) of the pile) and the constant of subgrade reaction of site soils (nh).
Using these values, the relative stiffness factor (T) if the pile can be determined based on
the following equation, T= (El /nh)0.2. Values of nh to be used In the analysis are
primarily a function of the consistency and texture of the soil which the pile penetrates.
For the limiting condition of saturated, loose sand disclosed at the site, a value of nh of 4
poi (pounds per cubic inch) is recommended.
For fixed head conditions, the moment and deflection can be calculated using elastic
methods. The maximum deflection which occurs at the ground surface would be:
y = 0.92 P13 /EI
where P is applied shear load and the other
terms have been previously defined.
The moment at the ground surface and the maximum moment (at a depth of 2.0T) below
the ground surface are ( -) 0.9 and 0.25 times the product of P times T, respectively.
The lateral capacity of closely spaced groups of piles can be significantly different than
that of a single isolated pile. Specifically, group effects tend to influence the deflection
behavior of piles when they are spaced closer than about eight pile diameters in the
direction of the applied lateral load. in general, the lateral deflections of piles in a group
would be approximately twice that for a single isolated pile. Individual piles subjected to
Cellular One
11 January 1990
W-6565
Page 6
repetitive cyclic loads may result in deflection magnitudes up to twice that of a pile
subjected to a static load. Therefore, for a given design Toad, we consider it appropriate
to generally double the computed static deflection values presented above.
Ultimate pile lateral load capacity can be estimated based on deflection or bending
moment criteria using the above relations. Lateral load capacity can also be estimated
by consideration of passive soil resistance. We recommend considering the ultimate soil
resistance to lateral pile loading as the passive resistance available within a depth equal
to eight times the pile width or diameter. Ultimate passive resistance can be taken as a
triangular pressure distribution modeled as an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per
cubic foot (pcf) for non - saturated soils. Groundwater levels were approximately 8 feet
below existing site grades during drilling. An ultimate passive pressure equal to 200 pcf
should be assumed for saturated soils.
If the required lateral capacity can not be obtained by the piles installed for the tower,
batter piles may be necessary to resist the lateral forces. We recommend a maximum
batter angle of 1 H:4V (Horizontal:Vertical). Batter piles lateral capacity can be assumed
equal to the horizontal component of the allowable pile compressive capacity when
battered.
•
. Cellular One • W-6565
11 January 1990 Page 7
We trust this letter is sufficient for your current needs. We would be able to review your
final pile design using the above parameters or to refine these estimates based on
specific pile diameters and lengths, as well as to provide construction observation
services, and to answer any questions you may have regarding soil design pressure.
Respectfully submitted,
RITTENHOUSE -ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
-tv-"r/ek- ea,e-
Larry A. Boge, RE.
Project Engineer
James S. Dransfield,
Associate
Enclosures: Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Site and Exploration Plan
Boring B -1
LAB:caol
:w SIST gp t
T
S ,90TM
j(j(
11 �I�
-Ls NL NV/
1,9yN Sj
s_11210 �7
t*OrD ST
PIRM IL S. ':
31
CELLULAR ONE
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
SITE VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
W.O. W -6565
By LAB
DATE DEC 1989
SCALE N.T.S.
RI7TENHOUSE -ZEMAN &
ASSOCIATES. INC.
Geotechnical & tlydrogeological
.Consultants
1400 140th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, ;IA 98005
RZA
TACOMA P.S.E. R/W
•
LONGACRES WAY
0 20 40
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
B —t INDICATES BORING NUMBER AND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION'
ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT
SHELTER
TOWER
X X X X
S. 185th STREET
CELLULAR ONE
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
SITE & EXPLORATION PLAN
FIGURE 2
W.O. W --8565
BY LAB
DATE PEC 1989
SCALE NOTED
RITTENHOUSE -ZEMAN & RZA
ASSOCIATES, INC
Geotechnical & Hydro Aeu1 ogieal
eir VI/
Consultants
1400140th . lrenue N. E.
Bellevue. WA 98005
RITTENHOUSE - -2EM& ASSOC., INC.
• .=1 Geotechnical / Environmental Consultants
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Ground Surface Elevation Approximately Feet
,'OPSOTT„ rontR and nrganit
Medium'dense, moist, brown,
silty SAND
P w
w 0
M w z
_ a
m m
o 1
■-0
Interbedded
Very soft to soft, grayish brown,
saturated, sandy SILT to silty CLAY
Medium dense to dense, black,
saturated, silty SAND
(continued)
0
d
BORING NUMB =3,_
W.O.' w -6565
PROJECT NAME Ceilq1dr One, Tukwila'
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE
• BLOWS PER FOOT
(140 ID. hammer, 30 Inch drop)
10 20 30 40 50
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
SAMPLING
= 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE
IC 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE
al 2.5'10 RING SAMPLE
B BULK SAMPLE
* SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED
40
=I
GROUND WATER
WATER LEVEL
AT TIME OF DRILLING
Alp
I SEAL
OATE
OBSERVATION
WELL TIP
LABORATORY TESTS
• % WATER CONTENT
NP NON PLASTIC
► ---41,--1 LIQUID LIMIT
t- -- NATURAL WATER
CONTENT
PLASTIC LIMIT
Is%∎ RI7TENHOLISE - -ZE & ASSOC., INC. BORING NUM - w o. W -6565
�'• .'. Geotechnical / llydrageological Consultants PROJECT NAME Cellular One, Tukmilla
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Ground Surface Elevation Approxtmatel
DEPTH (FEET)
m
5
F
a
zaW
0 M-
IX it
n
STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE
A. BLOWS PER FOOT
(140 1b. hammer. 30 inch drop)
yv
Medium dense to dense, black,
_ saturated, silty SAND -
- -
a
I
'1 •
-yam
._,..
-'
._
_
1
.....
x.
Total depth. 49 feet
"
completed 14 December 1989
.
•
•
.sue
�.._�.�....__..-
�.._
_.........
_._.i
....._4.
1
3
f
i
1
.__
... ..
E
x i
a
f a
----4---•-f---.-*-
• '
..— _ -___ _ t • • . . - I.
! 2
-
3 I
9 3
` i 1 1
Remo' (Ain -- - - - - -- -
•
$ 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE
11 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE
2.5' ID RING SAMPLE
a BULK SAMPLE
* SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED
WATER LEVEL
AT TIME OF DRILLING
SEAL
DATE
OBSERVATION ID
WELL TIP % IaLIQU h NATUAL WATER LIMIT
CONTENT
PLASTIC LIMIT
LABORATORY TESTS
• % WATER CONTENT
NP NON PLASTIC
DO- NOT-REMOVE CARBONS
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATI
A. Type
ki New Construction
0 Alteration
8. Gass C. Work Sc tt
XXPerrnanent eduie Dates 2,'
Beginning z1/90
❑ Temporary (Duration rnontfao End 3� 190
3A. Name and address of individual, company, corporation, etc. ro
construction or alteration,. (Number. Stroet City, State and Zip Code) p posing the
t t e 7R3 -R31Q
Telephone Number
Cellular One
101 Elliott Ave. W
Suite 435 •
Seattle., WA 98119
Fruit Approved OMB No. 717x/.0001
Aeronautical Study Number
iNM -O • •
2. to i • n of structure •
A. Include effective radiated power and assigned frequency
all existing, proposed Or modified AM. FM. or TV broadcast
stations utilizing this structure.
B. Include size and configuration of power transmission lir>eg
and their supporting towers in the vicinity of FAA facilities
and public airports.
C. include information showing site orientation. dimensions.
and construction materials of the proposed stru0lute.
Structure.is a. 100 foot steel
self - supporting, lattice tower
with a 17 foot whip antenna
operating on cellular band
A- 825 -895 MHz with 18 GHz
microwave antenna. ERP = 100 W
SE 45 Southcenter
(d Inure space is required continue on a seperete shook)
S. Height and Elevation .(Complete to the nearest loot)
loit.fliphtpark. A. Elevation of site above mean sea level
4f 27' 42
latitude
20
,tude
14 29
.. zscription of location of one with refit to highways, 'treats airports 'rent'
and to this notice.I p �
Site is located at 15700 Nelson Rd Sin Tukwila, WA, lying to the east of West Valley Hwy &
westerly of Longacres Race Track & Northerly Showing the releGOnsh' • prominent feature;, existing structures, etc. Attach a us: Geological
ip of corratrtiction site to nearest airport(s). (if more space is required, continue on a separate sheet of paper a Ca) Survey lNs ' ice. ma
paper attach
herly of Southcenter Blvd.
Not on whoukrtow7ngly anwittingly arse the Notice reouiremen Cof F.R Part Pa. n 77 are subject to a fine (crimin 91 penalty) not vmorion Act of for the s( fenseandrto(n ore
than 52,000 for subsequent offenses, pursuant to Section 902(a) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. as amended (49 U.S.C. 1472(a)).
HEREBY CERTIFY that all of the above statements made by me are true, complete, and correct to the best of my
knowledge. In addition, I agree to obstruction mark and /or light the structure in accordance with established marking &
lighting standards if necessary, .
Dote. Typed Name/Title of Peron Fnine Notice
IL/29/89 PI3i3 -ex-ley-, Director . of Engineering
Form 7460,.1 fu -E.5j
■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■®
ME •
■ ■..a •
MOM. •
■■■■ ■■ •
■■M■■ •
s ■ ■t ■ ■ ■•
Cellular
1\ r
FEB 20 1990
P LAN Nif \lG DEPT•
January 31, 1990
Jack Pace
Community Development Department
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Temporary Use Permit for Cellular One facility
South 158th Street and Nelson Place
Dear Mr. Pace:
Included with this letter are drawings and an
Environmental Checklist. Cellular One is requesting an
expedited approval to install a temporary Cellular Radio
Base Station (cell site) in Tukwila at South 158th Street
(Longacres Way) and Nelson Place. We will also be
submitting a Conditional Use Application for a permanent
facility at the same location.
REQUEST
Cellular One seeks to install a 100 foot telephone pole;
a shelter for the electronic monitoring equipment,
electrical service and telephone service. The wood pole
would be erected,.and two antennas would be attached: two
12 foot "whips". The 12 by 28 foot shelter would contain
the necessary electronic equipment and sit on a trailer
bed. Fencing (chain link, 6 feet high) for security
purposes would be installed to enclose the tower and
shelter.
Installation of a temporary facility is expensive, but
necessary to provide service in the immediate area.
Cellular One is therefore requesting that the temporary
facility be approved and allowed to remain until a
permanent facility is approved and installed. If for
some reason the permanent facility at this location is
not approved, then the temporary facility should be
allowed to remain until another location is found and
approval obtained.
101 Elliott Ave., Suite 435
Seattle, WA 98109
206/283-8319
• •
Letter from G.Wayne to J. Pace
Proposed Temporary Use
January 31, 1990
Page -2-
REASON FOR REQUEST
Currently, Cellular One is experiencing some rapidly
worsening bouts of interrupted service in the Tukwila
area. Primarily this is due to increased usage of mobile
telephone service in the Tukwila area. We understand the
City is experiencing increased growth from new businesses
wishing to become established in Tukwila. Cellular One,
as a provider of mobile telephone service, is also
experiencing growth of service demand. In addition,
Cellular One has recently been selected to provide mobile
telephone service to the Goodwill Games for
administrative and security purposes. McCaw Cellular
Communications holds the U.S. Government contract with
the General Services Administration and therefore the
FBI and Secret Service, who are responsible for the
safety and transportation of dignitaries during the Games
and for response to any unforeseen security threats.
The existing poor quality service will be further
aggravated by the usage of the system by Goodwill Games
personnel and local police protection agencies. Our
intent is to obtain a permanent facility at the same
location. We are in the process of preparing an
application for the required Conditional Use approval.
However, based on our conversations with the staff, we
are aware that a backlog of applications for various
approvals makes it unlikely that we could come before the
Planning Commission before the end of April. Provided
we obtained approval from the Planning Commission, the
construction period to install the equipment is expected
to take from one to two weeks. Given our bouts of system
overloading and interrupted service, we are compelled to
seek some immediate relief in the form of this request
for approval of a Temporary Use for our facility.
BACKGROUND
The United States Congress, through the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC), has mandated that
Domestic Public Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service
be provided through the issuance of two licenses in each
of the 305 Metropolitan Statistical Areas and the 428
Rural Statistical Areas of the United States. One of
these licenses is automatically granted to the local
wire -line telephone company, the other to an independent.
• •
Letter from G.Wayne to J. Pace
Proposed Temporary Use
January 31, 1990
Page -3-
McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., (Cellular One)
headquartered near Seattle, Washington, is the largest
cellular telephone company in the United States. Through
its regional and local subsidiaries, McCaw provides
cellular telephone service to many areas of the country,
serving a total population of over 40 million people.
McCaw's size and national presence create opportunities
and competitive advantages not available to smaller
cellular telephone companies permitting the development
of new technologies, improved customer service programs
and favorable service rates.
Cellular telephone service is a form of
telecommunications capable of high quality, high capacity
service to and from vehicle- mounted and hand -held radio
telephones. The cellular concept was developed in order
to provide quality mobile telephone service to a large
subscriber base with nationwide interconnect
compatibility. A cellular system consists of several
major elements. These are a Mobile Telephone Switching
Office (MTSO), cell base sites (antennas), cell site
interconnect facilities (which connect the MTSO with the
cell sites), and cellular telephones.
The McCaw Cellular Communication system in the Puget
Sound area (as elsewhere) depends on a network of
strategically placed cell base sites. A switching office
monitors the signal strengths of calls in progress. As
a caller moves away from one cell base site and the
signal strength of a call decreases, the computers
automatically switch the call to the next cell base site
which provides a stronger signal. A large well- designed
cellular system is capable of handling thousands of calls
at the same time, and can provide transmission quality
comparable to conventional landline telephone service.
The confluence of multiple freeways such as exists in
Tukwila (I -5, I -405, and the Valley Freeway) is a key
factor in locating effective cell sites and providing
quality transmission and service. (See attached
engineering letter.)
Cell base sites are oriented geographically in a
hexagonal grid pattern. Each cell site is located a
certain distance from neighboring cell base sites so that
it will provide service to a specific geographic area,
based on multiple factors including traffic distribution,
topographical features, radio interference concerns and
quality.
• •
Letter from G.Wayne to J. Pace
Proposed Temporary Use
January 31, 1990
Page -4-
Accordingly, cell site locations are characteristically
located in areas where the cell site is nearby to
freeways or heavily travelled arterials; where the line
of sight between roadway and cell site is minimally
obstructed and preferably away from hilltops and other
prominent land features where radio towers are typically
located to avoid inter - system interference. To provide
system coverage in densely populated areas, the search
area for a cell base site is quite small, often one -half
mile or less in diameter, depending upon topographical
factors, i.e., the presence of valleys, hills, bodies of
water which either stop or extend radio coverage causing
either a loss or "skipping" of radio propagation for long
distances and thus destroying service by causing inter-
system interference.
In addition to the technical factors, McCaw must also
locate property owners within these search areas which
are willing to accept cell site facilities on their
properties. (See attached record of negotiator's report
on all properties for Tukwila site.)
Like the City of Tukwila, which we understand is
experiencing growth pressures from new businesses
desiring to locate in Tukwila, McCaw Cellular
Communications is experiencing increased demand for their
cellular telephone service. There are approximately
50,000 cellular users in the Seattle area. This number
is doubling every two and one -half years. In the Tukwila
area, the net result of the increased demand is rapidly
worsening bouts of interrupted service in the area of the
confluence of I -5, I -405, and the Valley Freeway.
To improve the existing network of cell sites to meet
expanding demand, McCaw has received approvals to
construct an additional 30 cell sites in the following
jurisdictions: Bellevue, King County, Pierce County,
Seattle, Snohomish County and Tacoma. An additional 33
approvals are pending in Everett, Clallum County, Island
County, Lynnwood, Redmond, Renton, San Juan County,
Skagit County and several others. McCaw is also
sensitive to aesthetic issues and has cooperated with a
number of jurisdictions to minimize any undesirable
visual impact of a cell site facility by altering the
design of the tower and /or moving the sites where
technical and physical limits allow.
• •
Letter from G.Wayne to J. Pace
Proposed Temporary Use
January 31, 1990
Page -5-
Cellular communications is an extremely low -power use,
employing only a fraction of the power used by television
and radio broadcasters. Thus, cellular communication
systems are not a source of interference with consumer
electronic equipment such as radios and televisions. On
rare occasions such interference tends to be caused by
high -power broadcast sources like radio and television
broadcasters. The FCC has specific regulations and
exclusive authority to regulate and require elimination
of interference from such sources. Multiple cell site
locations are needed to provide the coverage required by
our FCC license for the King County area. McCaw Cellular
Communications is currently operating over 35 cell sites
around Puget Sound with no cases of television or radio
interference reported. Any microwave transmission is
also strictly controlled by the FCC in a similar manner
so that interference is avoided. McCaw Cellular
Communications has experienced no cases of interference
relating to any of its currently operating microwave or
cellular facilities.
The primary users of cellular mobile telephone service
are members of the business community and the public
sector. The mobile telephone becomes a useful tool for
the business community leading to increased productivity.
The larger groups of cellular users include business
owners and executives, professional managers,
construction industry personnel and sales professionals.
Additionally, mobile telephone service is extensively
used in the public sector and others providing emergency
services such as doctors, police and fire department
personnel. Public mobile telephone systems have become
an essential portion of the public communications
network. (See attached list of governmental agency
users.) In particular they represent the most secure
form of communication available for widespread usage to
security and law enforcement officials. Cellular mobile
telephone service allows police and others to conduct
discreet (cellular frequencies cannot be easily monitored
like normal police and federal law enforcement radio
channels) communications in the field. Those having
cellular mobile telephone service can and do contact the
911 to report accidents, fires and medical emergencies.
The recent natural disasters of Hurricane Hugo in
Charleston, S. C., and the earthquake in the San
Francisco Bay Area attest to the reliability and
performance to service rescue workers and the public
alike (See attached letter from California Public Utility
Commission). These are just a few of the uses of
Letter from G.Wayne to J. Pace
Proposed Temporary Use
January 31, 1990
Page -6-
cellular mobile telephone service.
We have included with this letter the above background
material which we hope will be helpful in understanding
the cellular technology and operational requirements
under which Cellular One operates. If there are further
questions, please contact me at 283 -8319. We
respectfully request some indication from your office as
to when we might expect to receive a response from the
City on our request for approval of the temporary use.
Sincerely,
• •
Page -7-
List of mailing addresses for property owners within 300
feet Conditional Use Application for proposed cell site
for Cellular One S. 158th (Longacres Way) and Nelsen
Place
000580 -0013
O.W. R.R. Nay. Co.
% Union Pacific RR Corp
P. 0. Box 2500
Broomfield CO 80020
1
000580 -0009
O.W. R.R. Nay. Co.
% Union Pacific RR Corp
P. O.Box 2500
Broomfield, CO 80020
000580 -0031
Robert F. Losey, Sr.
Wiwona Losey
808 SW 4th Place
Renton, WA 98055
242304 -9028
BNSF Burlington Northern RR
Property Tax Dept
777 Main Street, #2680
Fort Worth, TX 76102
000580 -0024
Holiday Corp - Helen Nelsen
Property Tax Dept #526
a1023 Cherry Road
Memphis TN 38117
000580 -0035
Commerce Mtg. Co.
Income Prop. /Boone
P. O. Box 4113
Portland, OR 97208
• •
Page -8-
242304 -9026
Metro Acct. Payable
Sorenton PR 5432 - 50706- D50218
821 2nd Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
242304 -9034
Jack 0. Nelson
1124 Sunset Avenue
Seattle, WA 98116
000580 -0011
Vernon Schacht
8363 Juanita Drive NE
Kirkland, WA 98043
000580 -0013
Helen B. Nelson
15643 W. Valley Highway
Tukwila, WA 98188
public utilities (ttomn
STATE OF CAL I F O R N
COMMISSIONER
November 1, 1989
Craig McCaw
Chairman
McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc.
P.O. Box 97060
Kirkland, WA 98083 -9760
Dear Craig:
I am writing on behalf of my colleagues to congratulate and
commend McCaw Cellular Communications and Bay Area Cellular
Telephone Company (BACTC) for your immediate and effective
assistance throughout the affected area during the recent
earthquake disaster.
Two aspects of McCaw's response stand out for special
commendation. First, you took all steps necessary to keep
service up despite the loss of power in the region and the damage
suffered by some of BACTC's facilities. As a result, vital
mobile communications were handled at volumes that reached twice
normal. Second, McCaw and BACTC immediately began distributing
telephones to emergency personnel and arranging with
manufacturers to supply, ultimately, over 2000 cellular phones in
less than 48 hours. These telephones proved essential in
coordinating emergency relief efforts throughout the region.
I know that these efforts started at the top with your personal
involvement along with other McCaw executives, staff and
technicians. Within hours of the earthquake, private and
chartered planes began arriving at Oakland Airport carrying
•cellular phones, emergency equipment and the people needed to
make it work. This past Monday John McCaw reported personally to
me about your efforts and McCaw's contining commitment to
California. I must say that McCaw's emergency response was a
convincing reaffirmation of that commitment.
Mr. Craig McCaw 0
Page 2
November 1, 1989
Again, on behalf of the Commission please accept my
congratulations and thanks for a job well done. Please also
extend the Commission's heartfelt condolences to the family of
the BACTC employee whose life was tragically cut short in this
disaster.
Cordially,
G. Mitchell Wilk
President
cc: John McCaw
Commissioners
• •
List of mailing addresses for property owners within 300 feet
Cond. Use Application for proposed cell site for Cellular One
S. 158th (Longacres Way) & Nelsen Place
000580 -0013
O.W. R.R. Nay. Co.
c/o Union Pacific RR Corp
PO Box 2500
Broomfield CO 80020
000580 -0009
0.W. R.R. Nay. Co.
c/o Union Pacific RR Corp
PO Box 2500
Broomfield CO 80020
000580 -0031
Robert F. Losey Sr.
Wiwona Losey
808 SW 4th Place
Renton WA 98055
242304 -9028
Burington Northern RR
Property Tax Dept.
777 Main Street, # 2680
Fort Worth TX 76102
000580 -0024
Holiday Corp - Helen Nelsen
Property Tax Dept # 526
1023 Cherry Road
Memphis TN 38117
000580 -0035
Commerce Mtg. Co.
Income Prop. /Boone
PO Box 4113
Portland OR 97208
242304 -9026
Metro Acct. Payable
Sorenton PR 5432 - 50706- D50218
821 2nd Ave
Seattle WA 98104
• •
P. 2 /List of mailing addresses for prop. owners within 300 feet
Cond. Use Application for proposed cell site for Cellular One
S. 158th (Longacres Way) & Nelsen Place
242304 -9034
Jack 0 Nelsen
1124 Sunset Ave
Seattle WA 98116
000580 -0011
Vernon Schacht
8363 Juanita Dr NE
Kirkland WA 98043
000580 -0013
Helen B Nelsen
15643 W Valley Highway
Tukwila WA 98188
•
•
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
)THER
BIRTH TO THREE DEV>
KATHLEEN MONZELOWS>
)THER
NW INDIAN FISHERS
JIM ANDERSON
)THER
HUMAN RESOURCES
CHERYL SCOTT
)THER
OFF.OF FINANCIAL M>
OFFICE OF THE DIR>
)THER
ECOLOGY & ENVIRONM>
DAVID ROBOCKER
)THER
MT. VIEW F.H. & CE>
JERRY HARRIS
)THER
DEFIBRILLATION STU>
MITI PROJECT
DOUG WEAVER
)THER
DAVID R. BROUDY M.>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DAVID R. BROUDY M.>
)THER
FRANK M. SPEAR
DENTIST
FRANK M. SPEAR
)THER
RIDGEMONT TERRACE
ASA, EUGENE
)THER
M.I.T.I - MEDIC ONE
WEAVER, DOUG
)THER
TULALIP TRIBES
IUKES, ROSE
)THER
CUSTOM HOUSE
HELSTROM, ROBERT
)THER
BEFORE BIRTH
GRIEBENOW, MARLA
)THER
CONTINENTAL INVEST>
)THER
CASCADE FAMILY PLA>
WILLIAMSON, DWIGHT>
)THER
BUREAU OF INDIAN A>
PUGET SOUND AGENCY
)THER
CASCADE FAMILY PLA>
WILLIAMSON, DWIGHT>
)THER
OAKRIDGE GROUP HOME
FITZER, BILL
)THER
MOUNTAIN RECUE COU>
DAVIS, BILL
)THER
DEPT. OF FINANCIAL>
)THER
EDERER, INC.
FINCH, JAMES
)THER
GOODWILL GAMES
MURRAY, JIM
)THER
GOODWILL GAMES
TAYLOR, SHERRY
)THER
BAYVIEW CEMETARY
DEBOER, DEAN
)THER
EMERGENCY SERVICE >
FOSTER, MERLO
)THER
EVERGREEN MANOR, I>
CROSBY, WALTER
)THER
DIS. BUSINESS SYST>
JEPPERSON, DAVE
)THER
MINOR & JAMES
HODGES, DR. WALLACE
)THER
EVERGREEN MANOR
CROZBY, WALTER
)THER
FIRST CHOICE HEALT>
MAUK, JOHN W.
)THER
TULALIP TRIBES
BOWECHOP, MICHAEL
)THER
BIDDLE & CROWTHER >
JACOBS, JAKE
)THER
TULALIP TRIBES
BOWECHOP, MICHAEL
)THER
INDIAN HEALTH SERV>
SWANSON, BONNIE
)THER
MINOR JAMES
DEMOPULOS, DR. PET>
)THER
MUEKELSHOOT TRIBE >
MOORE, DENNIS
)THER
FCC
FINANCE OFFICER
)THER
SKCNTE
LIEUTENANT PEACH
)THER
FCC
JOHNSON, WILLIAM
)THER
MITI PROJECT
MARTIN, JENNY
)THER
CHILDREN'S HOME HE>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
)THER
DUNCAN & ASSOC.
DUNCAN, STEVE
)THER
FCC
FERNDALE OFFICE
)THER
TULALIP TRIBES
FISHERIES DIRECTOR
WILLIAMS, TERRY
Page 1
•
•
3OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
POLICE
US CRIMINAL INVEST>
6TH REGION
COMMANDER, HQ.
POLICE
US CRIMINAL INVEST>
6TH REGION
COMMANDER HQ.
POLICE
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
BUSINESS UNIT
POLICE
EVERETT POLIC DEPT.
TERRY MILLER
POLICE
PUYALLUP POLICE DE>
CAPT. WHITE
POLICE DEPT.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
DEP. TEGREEN
POLICE
AUBURN POLICE DEPA>
PRITZL, WILLIAM M.
POLICE
MONROE POLICE DEPT.
WAKEFIELD, MARK
POLICE
NORMANDY PARK POLI>
READER, CHIEF LOCK>
POLICE
CITY OF LACEY POLI>
POLICE
KITSAP COUNTY SHER>
MARLENE
POLICE
FIFE POLICE DEPT.
POLICE
MEDINA POLICE DEPT.
WILSON, LT.
POLICE
KING COUNTY POLICE
VANDERWALKER, OFFI>
POLICE
CITY OF MERCER ISL>
SGT. MEYERS
POLICE
KITSAP COUNTY SHER>
614 DIVISION
MARLENE
POLICE
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
SHEFVELAND, KENNET>
POLICE
MEDINA POLICE DEPT.
LT. WILSON
POLICE
KING CO. POLICE DE>
URQUHARD, JOHN
POLICE
CITY OF PUYALLUP P>
DE WHITE
POLICE
KING COUNTY POLICE
DET. MUTA
POLICE
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
BUSINESS UNIT
POLICE
SNOQUAMISH POLICE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
POLICE
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
GIBBS, HARVEY
POLICE
WASHINGTON STATE P>
ARWINE, CONNIN A.
POLICE DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
NOEL, MICHAEL R.
POLICE DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
BUSINESS UNIT
POLICE
KING COUNTY POLICE
DET. PELUSO, J.J.
POLICE
PIERCE CO. SHERIFF>
REHD, GREG
POLICE
WASHINGTON STATE P>
BORRELL, LARRY W.
POLICE
REDMOND POLICE DEP>
SGT. MINER
POLICE
PIERCE COUNTY SHER>
GLOVER, GLENN
POLICE
SOUTH KING COUNTY >
POLICE
KITSAP COUNTY SHER>
MCNAMERA, ED
POLICE
SNOHOMISH CTY. SHE>
SMITH, DONNA
Page 1
:OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
DEPT.
RENTON FIRE DEPT.
KENT FIRE DEPARTME>
TUKWILA FIRE EXPLO>
PUYALLUP FIRE DEPT.
TUKWILA FIRE EXPLO>
CITY OF PUYALLUP F>
TUKWILA FIREFIGHTE>
LAKEWOOD FIRE DEPA>
LAKEWOOD FIRE DEPT.
CITY OF PUYALLUP F>
TUKWILA FIRE EXPLO>
TUKWILA FIRE FIGHT>
MERCER ISLAND FIRE>
FIRE DEPT. EMERGEN>
WHATCOM CO. FIRE D>
ANGLE LAKE FIRE DE>
CITY OF EVERETT FI>
CITY OF AUBURN FIR>
FIRE PROTECTION SE>
RENTON FIRE PREVEN>
WASHINGTON FIRE CO>
TUKWILA FIRE EXPLO>
FRANK, MERLE
PIERCE CO. FIRE DE>
REDMOND FIRE DEPT.
CITY OF PUYALLUP F>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY A>
CITY OF PUYALLUP F>
MONROE FIRE DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY FIRE>
KING CO. FIRE PROT>
KING CO. FIRE DIST>
SNOHOMISH CO. FIRE>
KING COUNTY FIRE D>
PIERCE COUNTY FI.RE>
PIERCE COUNTY FIRE>
PIERCE CO. FIRE DE>
PIERCE COUNTY FIRE>
KITSAP COUNTY FIRE>
SNOHOMISH FIRE DIS>
PIERCE COUNTY DIST>
PIERCE COUNTY FIRE>
PIERCE COUNTY FIRE>
SNOMOISH COUNTY FI>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY F>
TULALIP BAY FIRE D>
TULALIP BAY FIRE D>
FPD #15 OF SNOHOMI>
KITSAP COUNTY FIRE>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY F>
SNOHOMISH FIRE DIS>
KING COUNTY FIRE D>
KING COUNTY FIRE #>
231
COMMAND 2
RESCUE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DISTRICT #5
INVESTIGATION VAN
STATION 108/ REDM>
LAKEWOOD FIRE DIS>
POULSBO FIRE DEPT.
Page 1
DEHART, MICHAEL
ROBERTS, MARTY
CHIEF MERLE, FRANK
DAVE EWING
MERLE D. FRANK
KOHLER, STEVE
BYRON, CRAIG
LYONS, PHIL
MAULDER, WALT
THOMAIER, GARY K.
SLATER, ROB - CHAP>
RON
PRESTON, SAM
BAIMA, STEVE
NORTH, SANDY
RYDEEN, STEVE
ECKLER, W.M.
CARLON, ED
CARMAN, DICK
CRAIG, JEFF
CARLON, DICK
STICKELS, KIRK
HARRIS, HARRY
LEONA
RUSH, JIM
BLACK, JASON
SATHER, CHRIS
BERLIN, PAUL
PEARSON, BRYAN
HILTBURNN, DAVE
PEARSON, ERIC
SCHUELLER, FRANK
CHIEF MALONE, DENNY
CHIEF MALONE, DENNY
JAHN, STEVEN
SHEILDS, JIM
HILL, WILLIS
GIBBS, CHIEF DOUG
0
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
9ILITARY
PUGET SOUND NAVAL >
DISBURSING OFFICER
4ILITARY
NAVAL BASE, SEATTLE
COMMANDER
MILITARY
TRIDENT REFIT FAC.
CONTRACTING OFFIC>
9ILITARY
MCCHOLD AIR FORCE >
TAYLOR
9ILITARY
MCCHOLD AFB
TAYLOR
9ILITARY
COMMANDER COOP MINE
SQUADRON 11
9ILITARY
SUB BASE BANGOR
TRIDENT REFIT FAC
9ILITARY
NAVY
OFF- IN- CHG /NAV SE>
9ILITARY
NAVY
RECEIPT CONTROL
9ILITARY
DEPT. OF THE ARMY
MTMC -PNW
HILL, DAVE
9ILITARY
US MARINE CORPS
4ILITARY
COAST GUARD
THIRTEENTH DIST.
4ILITARY
DEFENSE COMMUNICAT>
4ILITARY
PUGET SOUND NAVAL >
NAVAL SUPPLY OF P>
GORDON, DIANE
4ILITARY
TRIDENT REFIT FACI>
CONTRACTING OFFIC>
4ILITARY
COAST GUARD
13TH DISTRICT
WATKINS, TIM OR CR>
4ILITARY
NAVY
RECEIPT CONTROL
4ILITARY
COAST GUARD
13TH DISTRICT
COMMANDER (DTTM)
4ILITARY
MCCORD AIR FORCE B>
NAFFMB
4ILITARY
NAVY
PUGET SOUND NAVAL>
4ILITARY
MADIGAN ARMY
MEDICAL AIR VAC.
FRY, KENNETH D.
4ILITARY
MADIGAN ARMY
MEDICAL CENTER
SMITH, SUSAN
4ILITARY
MILITARY SEALIFT C>
COMPTROLLER
CLAUDIA
4ILITARY
COAST GUARD
13TH DISTRICT
COMMANDER (AFO)
4ILITARY
COMMANDER MINE GRO>
NAVY
SUPPLY OFFICER
4ILITARY
66 MAW /ACFC
DET MCCH
JAN KILLIAN
Page 1
GOVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
:HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITALS
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITGAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITALE
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
NEUROSURGERY NORTH>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
AMERICAN RED CROSS
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
NEUROSURGERY NORTH>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
EVERGREEN GENERAL >
GROUP HEALTH
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ARNOLD PAVILION WO>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL 0>
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL >
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
EVERGREEN MEDIC ONE
TACOMA ORTHOPAEDIC>
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH. S>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL >
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
GROUP HEALTH COOPE>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH PHARM>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
GROUP HEALTH
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL P>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH MARKE>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GREENLAKE MEDICAL >
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
FIFTH AVE. MEDICAL>
ARTHRITIS PHYSICIA>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL ->
GROUP HEALTH COOPE>
CPA
SEATTLE KING COUN>
OBSTETRICS /GYNECO>
ADMIN. SERVICES
RADIOLOGISTS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Page 1
VAN SICLEN, DR.
TATE, MARGE
FLORENCE, DR. MICH>
POLICAR, J.R.
BRYANT, DR. RONALD
VAN SICLEN, DR.
BUCKNER, THOMAS J
TATE, MARGE
FLORENCE, DR. MICH>
BRYANT, DR. RONALD
JACKSON, STANLEY
BILNOSKI, DR. WILL>
ELLIE FISCHER
O'BRIEN, DAVID
PETER JOHNSON
THOMAS BROWN, M.D.
GREER, MICHAEL/ TA>
DR. GUY V. BUELL
HELEN ANDERSON
HELEN ANDERSON
DUNIRE TELECOMM.
DUNMIRE TELECOMM.
CHERIE WASSCHE
DUNMIRE TELECOMM.
CRAIG J. WEHRLI
CC CHAN, M.D.
STEPHEN BADER
GENE HOEPLING
DR. ROBERT ANDERSON
SANDBULTE, WILBUR
DR. MCKELVEY
DR. RICHARD CRINZI
DR. SAM CULLISON
NUDELMAN, PHIL
KEVIN P. SCHOENFEL>
PENNA, PETE
DRUMHELLER, GLEN W
DR. RONALD G. EARL>
ARAGON, ROSEMARY
HUHS, MARYANN
DR. JEFFREY WERNER
DR. WAY WEISSMAN, >
DR. THIESSEN
WOOD, DAVE
DUNMIRE TELECOMM.
ARTHUR D. WIRTHALA>
DUNMIRE TELECOMM.
JOHN C. PETERSON
DR. MCCOWEN
DR. STEVE FELLER, >
CANER, JOHN M.D.
KEN FREEMAN
DR. DEMIRJIAN
PEGGY
DAVID SHERER
IOSPITAL
IOS PITAL
10SPIITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOS PITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
10SPITAL
IOS PITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
{OS PITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{OS PITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{OS PITAL
JOS PITAL
iOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
{OS PITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
LOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{OS PITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
JOS PITAL
iOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{OS PITAL
IOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
CARDIOTHOACIC SURG>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
GREATER LAKES MENT>
SUMMIT VIEW CLINIC>
GROUP HEALTH HORIZ>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
FACIAL PLASTIC SUR>
VIRGINIA MASON CLI>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
PACIFIC MEDICAL CT>
PACIFIC MEDICAL CT>
WASHINGTON ST. HOS>
VALLEY MEDICAL CTR.
GROUP HEALTH COOP
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MINOR & JAMES MEDI>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL>
ORTHOPAEDIC PHYSIC>
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH
N.W. HOSPITAL
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP '
GROUP HEALTH COOP
GROUP HEALTH COMMU>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
EVERGREEN HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
STGEVENS MEMORIAL >
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL >
ANKLE & FOOT CLINI>
POWERS AMBULANCE S>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPHHOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
NAVAL HOSPITAL BRE>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP
PEDIATRICS
COMMUNITY HEALTH >
TELECOMMUNICATION>
MEDICAL CENTER
CARDIOLOGY
COMPUTER SERVICES
BUSINESS OFFICE
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
SPECIALTY CTR.
LABORATORY
SILVERDALE MEDICA>
DENNIS THORNTON
DR. PHEIFER
DUNMIRE COMM.
BEDSIDE X -RAY
CODE 017
COMMUNICATIONS
Page 2
PENIX, CANDY
LEONARD QUADRACCI,>
CLARK, DR. HOWARD
PHILIP DUBOIF
DR. CHENTOW
CARLOS E. GARCIA, >
DR. DHRU
HILL LEWIS
INEZ BRUCE
RIFENBERY, DR. JIM
JACKSON, DR. FREDE>
STEPHEN B. ANDERSO>
WILLIS TAYLOR, M.D.
TRUSCOTT, AL
WENDY TERLIZZI
SMITH, GLENDA
LEO GREENAWALT
MAGGIE TEAL
WEINSTEIN, GLORIA
JOHN HYNES
P. SCOTT POLLOCK, >
DASH, DR. HAROLD
NED BORGSTROM
DONALD KUHLMANN
LAWRENCE E. HOLLAN>
JONES, M.D. DIANE
PITKETHLY, DR. DAV>
BERTRAND, KEN
HALTERMAN, DON
COREY, DR. LAWRENCE
NICKEL, DR., M.D.
SANDBLOM, DR. ROBE>
ZAMMIT, MICHAEL M.>
HATCH, EDWIN M.D.
HOBSON, KAREN
SALMONS, CHUCK
LEONARD, JIM
THORNTON, BETTY
THORNTON, BETTY
WEBER, JAMES K. M.>
KULP, KATHY
GOLLER, DR. DEBRA
TRIMBLE, DR. DOUG
FENBERG, DR. CYNTH>
NOEL, LEWIS
ROSS, AUSTIN
SILBERMAN, SANFORD>
FREEMAN, KENNETH
SCHERBARTH, DR. KE>
GREEN, DR. BERT
KILBURN, DR. PETER>
TESLER, DR.
KILBURN, DR. PETER>
PRZASNYSK, DR.
JOHNSON, RENE
LANG, DR. ROBERT
OWENS, HARMON
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL'
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
.OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
.: OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
; OSPITAL
OSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
VIRGINIA MASON SOU>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST PETERS HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY OF WASH>
POWERS AMBULANCE S>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
AUBURN COMMUNITY H>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH Y>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL M>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
AMERICAN LAKE VA M>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
FIFTH AVENUE MEDIC>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
SEATTLE ORTHOPAEDI>
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
GROUP HEALTH COOP
GREENLAKE MEDICAL >
AURORA MEDICAL SER>
MEMORIAL CLINIC
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST. PETER'S HOSPIT>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
FEDERAL WAY MEDIC>
J.R. DUNMIRE
DUNMIRE TELCOMM.
EXECUTIVE OFFICES
ACCOUNTING & BILL>
TRAINING DEPT.
COOP MEDICAL LAB
LOWRY'S RX
CHIEF SUPPORT SER>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
LOWERYS
MEDIC UNIT SUPERV>
ACCOUNTING
Page 3
SHERER, DR. DAVID
KOFLER, THOMAS J.
RATTRAY, DR. MARK
RODGERS, JAMES E. >
KIEHL, DR. ROBERT
WOLF, CHARLES J. M>
HARVEY, JANNA
MCCABE, DR. MARSHA>
FAY, DR. GERALD
NORTON, DR. STEVEN
BROWN, THOMAS A. M>
HENLEY, DR. M. BRA>
POWERS, ROBERT
HANSING, CHARLES E>
ROSHOLM, DR. JOHN
SCHAUL - BERKE, SHAY
JOHNSTON, WILLIAM >
JOHNSON, DR. CHRIS
WILSON, CHARLES L.
ENOMOTO, DR. DENNIS
STERN, MICHAEL M.D.
DAVIS, AUBREY
FLANERY, MARK F.
BURNETT, DR. CURTIS
MCWHINNIE, TOM
SAVITCH, LANE
MUNDING, CARL
MILLER, L.
MATHEWS, DONNA
SUENO, DR. JOSEPH
LYONS, DR. RICHARD
WAGNER, DR. JAMES >
HALL, DR. SCOTT
GRADIN, WES M.D.
PUCKET, WALT M.D.
ANDERSON, RUPERT M>
GEHRETT, JOSEPH JR.
POWER, PAT
WISE, D.M. M.D.
TORGERSON, DR. ART>
HARMS, LARRY
CLAYTON, TOM
BIGGS, BILL
GARDNER, BRUCE
POPPEMA, DR. SUZAN>
BRENNAN, DR. WILLI>
POWER, DR. JAMES L.
SEAMAN, DR. RICHARD
GRENLEY, DR. ROBERT
RUBENS, DR. ROBERT
MAIER, CHARLES L. >
TESLER, DR. ALAN
STEUDEL, DR. THEOD>
WARNER, PAT
ISLER, DR. JOHN T.
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
- OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
{OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
-{OSPITAL
-OS PITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
- OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
-iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
IOS PITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
: iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
- OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
: iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
- iOSPITAL
: iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
-JOSPITAL
1OSPITAL
• iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
TACOMA GENERAL HOS>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY PLACE P>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
VALLEY MEDICAL CTR.
KITSAP HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
OVERLAKE
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY >
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
MINOR & JAMES MEDI>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH.S>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
MULTICARE HEALTH C>
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ALPINE FOOT & ANKL>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MINOR AND JAMES CL>
VIRGINIA MASON SOU>
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST GASTROEN>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL>
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
KRUGER CLINIC
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ACCOUNTING
PATHOLOGY CONSULT>
TELECOM
J.R. DUNMIRE
HEALTH CARE OF WA.
CYTOLOGY
PEDIATRIC HOME CA>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ANESTHESIA RESOUR>
Page 4
TEGENFELDT, DAVID
COPPES, JOHN
CROWLEY, JAMES M.>
CREALOCK, DR.
GIFFORD, J. M.D.
HAUTALA, DR.
GALLAGHER, J. JAMES
ALTHOUSE, DR. RALPH
WU, DR. THOMAS
MYERS, GERLAD M.D.
COHEN, RAY
NEIGHBOR, DR.
CONKLIN, DR.
GRIESMAN, DR.
O'QUIN, DR. RONALD
SHIBATA, KEN
BLINSTRUB, DR.
DIMANT, JOHN
CRERAND, RAY
BALCH, THOMAS GB.
WARNER, PAT
KRAUSS, DR. RON
WILLIAMS, DR.
HERNDON, PAUL
MACLEOD, DOUG M.D.>
DIGHTMAN, DR.
WEST, BRUCE
COOMBS, JOHN B.
PARIS, DR. F.
KNODEL, ARTHUR R.
GILLESPIE, DR.
KOONTZ, DR.
GARCIA, DR.
BUCKWOLD, DR.
GINGRICH, ROY
JORDAN, CHRISTOPHER
HALL, LYNNE
JONES, DR. STONESI>
WEARN, DR.
BITSEFF, DR.
RAO, DR.
HEALEY, DR. WILLIA>
BURT, DR.
ADDISON, DR. JOHN
DESCHNER, DR. WILL>
LEVENSON, DR.
WOHLAMN, ROBERT A.
MALO, DR.
THIESSEN, DR.
WILLIAMS, DOUG
WOHNS, DR.
JONES, DAVID B. M.>
HOOD, JOEY
MUNOZ, DR.
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
( OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
(OSPITAL
EOSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
!OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
'. OSPITAL
(OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
(OS PITAL
( OSPITAL
(OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[OSPITAL
(OSPITGAL
[OSPITAL
`. OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
:ASPITAL
: OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
(OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
!0SPITAL
: OSPITAL
'. OSPITAL
:0SPITAL
'0SPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
(OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
:OS PITAL
: OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[OS PITAL
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
`OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
GROUP HEALTH
LYNX MEDICAL SYSTE>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
CASCADE VALLEY HOS>
WASHINGTON STATE H>
VIRGINIA MASON
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
CARDIAC STUDY CENT>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MCINTYRE EYE AND S>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ROOSEVELT MEDICAL >
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GENERAL HOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
EVERGREEN HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
NW NEUROLOGICAL SU>
MULTI HEALTH SYSTE>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
VIRGINIA MASON
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPIT>
UNIVERSITY OF WASH>
SNOCOM
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
EVERGREEN HOSPITAL>
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL>
CABRINI MEDICAL TO>
FIFTH AVENUE MEDIC>
NORTHWESTERN RADIO>
NORTHWESTERN RADIO>
NORTHWESTERN RADIO>
FIFTH AVE. MED. CE>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
NW HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS
ALLEMORE MEDICAL C>
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
OVERLAKE ANESTHESI>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
GROUP HEALTH COOP
GROUP HEALTH COOP
OVERLAKE MEDICAL C>
TOTEM CREST MEDICA>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL >
TACOMA
MOUNTLAKE TERRACE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TACOMA RADIATION->
RADIOLOGY
BEDSIDE X -RAY
DEPT. OF SURGERY
MEDIC 7
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM.
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
Page 5
CHRISTOPHER, DR.
FITZ, DR. JP
SMITH, MASON A.
THOMPSON, ROBERT L>
EWELL, CHRIS
BAKER, FRANK
CARLSON, DR. MARK
ZAHNOW, ROBIN
GINGRICH, ROY
PERSON, JERRY
BOMFORD, CALVIN
NG, DR AMOYU
BILLINGHAM, DR.
GILMAN, DR.
KEMP II, JOHN A.
FISHER, LAWRENCE E.
CHUNG, DR. TIMOTHY
OH, GEORGE D.
PALMER, OVIDIO
POWELL, PAT
BARTLETT, DR. ROY
BADER, STEVEN
GIBSON, DR. JOHN
MCNAUGHTON, DR.
ANDERSON, DR.
FISK, JOHN D
BAERG, DR. RICHARD
ARCHER, SHIRLY
KULPA, PATTY J.
KRUSE, DR. SANDI
OLSEN, DENNIS
CARLSON, DR. ROBERT
BURNS, JOHN F. M.>
WALTZ, DR.
SZEKELY, DANIEL M.>
WILKEN, WILLIAM H.
LICHTER, BARRY
PALERMO, JOSEPH
ANDERSON, JOHN M.D.
BERNARDI, LOUIS D.>
AU, DR. ALLEN
ELLIS, TRUMAN E
KOLWITZ, ANN
WEATHERBY, CHARLES>
SLACK, DR. STEVEN
WARNER, PAT
ROSENSHEIN, M.D.
DR. AGRICOLA
MARION, M.
STUMBERG
STRENGER
DAULT, DR. STEVEN
KOHLBERG, IRVING J.
MANHAS, DR. D.
HAYNES, ROBERT
FERRIN, DR. DAVID
SOVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
CASCADE VALLEY HOS>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
FIRST CHOICE HEALT>
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL >
MADIGAN ARMY MEDIC>
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
EVERGREEN HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
FIRST CHOICE MEDIC>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
EVERGREEN HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
GROUP HEALTH
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
HEALTH CARE FOR WO>
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC.>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
OVERLAKE MEDICAL C>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
NORTHWEST EYE CENT>
GROUP HEALTH
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY >
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
SOUTH HILL FAMILY>
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
LYNNWOOD
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
PLANT SERVICES
ACCOUNTING
Page 6
CLARK, DR. HOWARD
THOMAS, DOUG.
LACEY, HUGH M.D.
DR. GUMPRECHT
STANLEY S. M.D.
CLIFT, STEPHEN
JOLLEY, DR. TIM
KANG, KALLE
HARA, PAM
DR. HAEG
KING, ALEX
YU, AMY M.D.
DR. SHIFRIN
SWEENEY III, THOMAS
CONTRERAS, RUBEN M>
HAYNES, ROBERT E. >
ZABRISKIE, DR. VIN>
BLISS, DR. GARRISON
FIELD, CLAYTON
SHANAMAN, FRED
GALINDO, JORGE H. >
KULP, KATHY
DR. EVANS
MCCOY, ROBERT
STARK, ROGER M.D.
DR. BAUERMEISTER
DR. BLACK
STEWART, DR. DONALD
THOMAS, DOUG
BRUMLEVE, PETER
HYNES, DR. MIKE
MCGEE, DR. RICHARD
SHANAMAN, JANE
KOZIE, DANIEL M.D.
JACOBSEN, DR. JUDI>
BILLINGSLEY, DR. J>
TURNER, HANK
KREISMAN, DR. KENT
DR. GREENBLATT
ANDERSON, DR. S.B.
DR. KENNY
LOWENSTEIN, MICHAEL
CRANER, JOHN F. M.
TEELE, MAGGIE
DR. HOLDER
PETERS, DR. WILLIAM
RUOFF, DAVID M.D.
WINDMEYER, GINA
BROWN, J. STEPHEN >
CROCKER, MIKE
MONROE, LANCE M.D.
BERSCH, BARRY
CHAPMAN, DR. KYLE
ANNEST, DR
DR. HURST
OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
' OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
D SPITAL
. OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
.OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
O SPITAL
OSPITAL
O SPITAL
:OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
OS PITAL
:OSPITAL
OS PITAL
:OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
.: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
VIEWPOINT RECOVERY>
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
MADIGAN ARMY MEDIC>
ST. JOSEPH HOPITALS
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GENERAL HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOP
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE .HEALTH S>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH COOPE>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
VIEWPOINT RECOVERY>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY >
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
DEPT. OF EMERGENCY>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
VIRGINIA MASON MED>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
FIFTH AVENUE MEDIC>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GENERAL HOSPITAL C>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
ENUMCLAW COMMUNITY>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
PACIFIC NORTHWEST >
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DEPT. OF EMERGENC>
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
COMMUNICATIONS
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
PHYSICIAN RELATIO>
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
ALLENMORE MEDICAL>
TSC GENERAL SURGE>
INTERNAL MEDICINE
Page 7
MOOREHEAD, DR. D.
BIGGERS, DR. OLIVER
TAULMAN, GARY
OREHEK, JOHN
BRACHVOGEL, MAX
KODE, SHAILA B.
BILLINGSLEY, JAMES
HOLLE, ROLF M.D.
SKALLEY, T.W.
FORD, DR. JOHN
DR. DUENHOELTER
DR. SHERIDAN
DR. HILGER
DR. ZBARASCHUK
FREED, STUART
CHITNIS, NICOLE M.>
MCCABE, DR. DANIEL
TOM, RUSS
WOODS, S.
HOCHNADEL, JEAN
SIMONOWILZ, DR. DA>
RUDER, CHLOE
DAY, DR. SHERMAN
MIC
MELMAN, KENNETH M.>
WINGE, CARL
WILLIAMS, DR. HENRY
STAGE, DAVID M.D
CLARK, POLLY
KENNEDY & HELDRIDG>
LOCKEY, WILLIAM M.
EDWARDS, B. M.D.
HARRISON, STEVEN D.
BADER, STEPHEN
MARSIDI, IGNATIUS
WARE, DR. KEVIN
JOHNSON, DR. NOEL >
HUBBELL, CHARLES G>
MARTIN, DR. MICHAE>
OZOLIN, DR
HYMAN, BRIAN K. M>
BAMFORD, CALVIN
MARASSI, NICK M.D.
SCHALLER, DR. ROBE>
ANDERSON, DR. DEAN
ROON, DR. ANTHONY
WETSTONE, DR. SCOTT
DR. MATHESON
DOLL, ADRIAN
SNYDER, DR. RODNEY
HOGAN, CHARLIE
BRITELL, JONATHON
DR. BAUERMEISTER
POPP, DENNIS
SCHUSTER, GARY
GRIFFEE, DON
BEGERT, ANN M.D.
OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OS PITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
'OS PITAL
: OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
. OSPITAL
HOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
DSPITAL
; OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
[OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
EDMONDS FAMILY PRA>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
THREE TREE MEDICAL>
PROVIDENCE MEDICAL>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY SERVICE >
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH HOSPI>
VIRGINIA MASON HOS>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
GROUP HEALTH
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
GENERAL HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SEATTLE SURGICAL G>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
GOOD SAMARITAN
ORTHOPAEDICS INT'L
GROUP HEALTH FACIL>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
GENERAL HOSPITAL 0>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
GENERAL HOSPITAL M>
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
ST. JOSEPHE'S HOSP>
AUBURN HOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
N.W. NEUROLOGIC S>
NORTHWEST NEUROLO>
COMMUNICATIONS
INTERNAL MEDICINE>
NEURO /2B
DUNMIRE TELECOMM
DEPT. OF RADIOLOGY
BASEMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
DEPT. OF SURGERY
COMMUNITY HEALTH
COMMUNICATIONS
Page 8
THOMAS, DOUG
POTTER, DR. MICHAEL
ERIKS, BOB
FENNELL, KATHY
ZAPATA, JORGE
HOGAN, CHARLES
MCCLEAN, PATRICK
LEGGETT, DR. G.
DR. BURNS
GIBSON, JOHN M.D.
FOSTER, MERLO
BURNS, DR.
GIBSON, JOHN M.D.
WIDLUND, DR. BENGT
WARNER, PAT
SCATENA, ROBERT H.
ROWLAND, DR.
SCHUSTER, JOSEPH 0>
KRAFT, DENISE M.D.
REA, PAT
DR. HUNTER
DR. COHEN
DR. WALTMAN
DR. MARSH
FEIN, WARREN M.D.
DR. NOU
LUDKE, PAULA
FOX, DR. ROSS
OWENS, HARMON
TAIT, DOUGAS A.
NEERING, MARY K. >
MINOR, DR. HUGH
DR. KENEVAN
GLENN, NANCY
SLEPYAN, DAVID
REGALADO, MICHAEL
HOPKINS, PATTY
SWEET, DEBRA
PARR, DR. NORVIN
SMITH, DR.•NEALE
SCATENA, ROBERT H.
MABBUT, L.W.
DR. LOONEY
DR. SPANGLER
THOMAS, DOUG
SHARMAHD, DR. STEV>
DR. DE GROOT
MISBACH, GREGORY M>
DR. DOVE
MUNCY, ° DR. ELLEN
LUKENS, DAVID L.
HUIRAS, MIKE
HARDING, MARCIA
JOHNSON, DR. RALPH
WAGONFELD, DR.
DR. SECAUR
WESTERFIELD, GLORIA
OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
O SPITAL
O SPITAL
OSPITALS
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
! OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
! OSPITAL
DSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
! OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
! OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
:OS PITAL
: OSPITAL
: OSPITAL
:OSPITAL
ASPITAL
( OSPITAL
LOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
fOSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
! OSPITAL
( OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
[OSPITAL
[ OSPITAL
LOSPITAL
(OSPITAL
[OSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
SEATTLE VETERANS H>
GROUP HEALTH
MULTICARE HEALTH
GROUP HEALTH HOSPI>
GROUP HEALTH
PATHOLOGY DIAGNOST>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ST. PETER'S HOSPIT>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH
GROUP HEALTH COOP.
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
GROUP HEALTH
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
PROVIDENCE MEDICA>
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
COMMUNITY MEMORIAL>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
DOCTORS CLINIC ASS>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
DEPT. OF NEUROLOG>
HUMAN RESOURCES
PRACTICE MGT.
ORTHOPAEDICS
NEONATAL ASSOC.
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNICATIONS
Page 9
OLSEN, MARIAN
COLLINS, DR. K.
COLMAN, LAUREN
CHELLIN, VICKI
GRIESMAN, DR. F.A.
GOODKIN, ROBERT
DELL, JERRY
COOMBS, MARTHA
BITTLE, LOUISE
SIMS, CHARLES
DR. KENDALL
DR. LARSON
DR. LARSON
ALLERICH, SEAN
HOGAN, CHARLIE
RUSSELL, ROGER
STROUD, BRENDA
THOMPSON, LARRY
LUDWIG, WM. RICHAR>
MATHEWS, MEREDITH
SHERBURNE, PHILE
CASTILLO, ABIE
DR. BENNETT
STRATTON, WILLIAM
BORTEL, DAVID M.D.
MCCLOSKEY, JOHN
DR. VIG
VOLKMANN, DONALD
ARCEGA, DR. NATHAN>
NORMAN, PETER
BRUCE, INEZ
WARNER, DR. CHARLES
SCHUSTER, GARY
FORMAN, FRANK
SCHNEIDER, PAUL
EVANS, RUSS
O'NEIL, ROBERT D.
OTTMAR, STEVEN
EVANS, RILEY D.
O'NEIL, ROBERT D.
KELLEY, REED
CLARK, STEPHEN N,
CHILDERS, SUE
DEPAPE, KATHY
ENGELHART, DEBRA
JOHNSON, TED
BINDER, RUBIN
ROCHEFORT, DR. BAR>
IVERSON, LARRY D.
THOMPSON, JON W.
SHARMA, PANKAJ
GORMAN, LARRY M.
TOLLES, STEFFAN R.
LEE, ARTHUR B.
MICHAELIS, MILTON
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
IOSPITAL
( OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
fOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
LOSPITAL
LOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
fOS PITAL'
{OSPITAL
{OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
JOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
fOS PITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
iOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{0SPITAL
{OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
.{OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
iOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
{ OSPITAL
IOSPITAL
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
BARET MEDICAL SERV>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ST. PETER'S HOSPIT>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
GENERAL HOSPITAL 0>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
GENERAL HOSPITAL 0>
VIRGINIA MASON
GROUP HEALTH
PACIFIC MEDICAL CE>
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
ST. PETER'S HOSPIT>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
VIRGINIA MASON SOU>
PACIFIC MEDICAL CT>
HARBORVIEW MEDICAL>
KITSAP HOSPITAL
VALLEY GENERAL HOS>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SWEDISH HOSPITAL.
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL
PACIFIC HEALTH
WEST SEATTLE COMMU>
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPIT>
ST. PETERS HOSPITA>
LAKEWOOD HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY OF WASH>
VIRGINIA MASON MED>
GENERAL HOSPITAL
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
MEDICAL ANESTHESIA>
VIRGINIA MASON CLI>
GOOD SAMARITAN HOS>
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
FIDALGO MEDICAL AS>
HIGHLINE HOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
GROUP HEALTH COOP
VIRGINIA MASON
KITSAP HOSPITAL
HOLLY CORP.
BEDSIDE X -RAY
CHIEF OF STAFF
-INTERNAL MEDICINE
SEATTLE RADIOLOGY
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ONOCOLGY
PHYSICAL OCC. THE>
Page 10
WILDE, GREG
HUANG, ANTHONY B.
KELLEY, DANIEL
KELLEY, DAVE
LAWRENCE, RICK
COHEN, MICHELL
OLDHAM, BRENT
PINKERS, L.H.
BARRETT, CHARLES
DR. BLACKETT
DR. PERSON
EDDY, TERRI
DR. BOOZER
DR. STARR
INOUYE, THEODORE K.
THOMAS, DR. GORDON
COOPER, DR. TOM
BEARMAN, SCOTT
SINGER, DR. KARL L.
DRURY, DR. ROBERT
TESSA
TOOMEY, JIM
WONDERLY, DR.
WARNER, PAT
DR. PERSON
COLOCOUSIS., DR. JO>
HARRIS, SUE
FOY, HUGH M.
GRAHAM, ELLEN
DR. ERIKS
SAVITCH, LANE
DR. FOSS
COTTERILL, DR.
GOLDMAN, STEPHEN
BOSWELL, CHERYL
JENNINGS, JON
DR. GRIFFITH
NIETO, DR. FRANK
TOTUSEIC, ERICA
DAVIDSON, DEBI F.
HARDING, DR. RICHA>
WINEMILLER, JAY
WISEBECK, DR. WILL
ROSS, AUSTIN
ROSE, DR. JEFFREY
BEGALKA, LORI
LARSON, DR. JAMES >
BREWER, MARGARET
DURAN, WAYN M.D.
DR. HEACOX
CASTLE, DR. TOM
RAMERMAN, DR. WAYNE
VAN BODEGORN, DR. >
PURACAL, D.S. M.D.
MCCONNELL, DR. ROB>
CAPLAN, DR. GARY
BEVELEY, THOMAS L.
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
IOSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL
GOULD, DR. RANDALL
[ OSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
SMITH, MEREDITH
IOSPITAL
CASCADE CLINIC
O'DONNELL, PATRICK>
IOSPITAL
CASCADE VALLEY HOS>
CAMPBELL, BOB
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
LINDOR, KENT
( OSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
SLACK, STEVE
IOSPITAL
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL
DUNMERE, JANELLE
IOSPITAL
PUGET SOUND HOSPIT>
GYFT CLINIC
NIXON, VALERIE
IOSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
ZECH, RALPH M.D.
IOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
MCCARY, MR. STEVE
IOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
HALLOCK, HELEN
( OSPITAL
GENERAL HOSPITAL 0>
SMITH, DR. BUDGE
IOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
YARNALL, DR. STEVE.
( OSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
HOFFMAN, DAVID M.
IOSPITAL
AUBURN GENERAL
SWINEHART, FRANK J>
{ OSPITAL
FIDALGO MEDICAL CE>
CLURE, DR. H.R.
IOSPITAL
SKAGIT VALLEY LAB
BIESECKER, DR. JAM>
{ OSPITAL
FERTILITY CLINIC 0>
PUGET SOUND HOSPI>
NIXON, VALERIE
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
HARTNESS, MICHAEL
{ OSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
WARNER, PAT
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
BURNS, DR. TED
( OSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
COLLINS, N.J. BUZ
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
DR. SPAULDING
IOSPITAL
GROUP HEALTH
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FELDMAN, CHERYL
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
WARD, LARRY
IOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
SCHNALL, DR. WILLI>
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
CARTER, JEFF
IOSPITAL
KITSAP HOSPITAL
SIMONS, MARK
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ALLENMORE MEDICAL>
DR. MIHALI
( OSPITAL
AUBURN GENERAL HOS>
SHOPE, MARK M.D.
IOSPITAL
STEVENS MEMORIAL H>
SCHULTZ, DR. FORDY>
IOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
OTT, DR. CARL R.
IOSPITAL
ST. JOSEPHS HOSPIT>
CLABOTS, JOSEPH P.
( OSPITAL
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
DAVIDSON, DEBI F.
IOSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
HART, JAMES
( OSPITAL
NORTHWEST HOSPITAL
SCHNURMAN, HINDA
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
WILSON, DR. JAMES >
IOSPITAL
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
ESLIT, TERRI
IOSPITAL
ST. PETERS HOSPITAL
DR. FOLEY
{ OSPITAL
SWEDISH HOSPITAL
WASSERMANN, PETER
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
PINGREY, GARY
{ OSPITAL
REPRODUCTIVE HEALT>
HAYES, NANCY
IOSPITAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
SPINA, TOM
Page 11
3OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
KEDICAL
SEATTLE SURGICAL G>
JOHN DAWSON
KEDICAL
VALLEY MEDICAL CEN>
DR. LUCA RATTAZZI
KEDICAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
ROBIN POPICH
KEDICAL
MULTICARE HEALTH S>
MICHAEL L. HALSTEA>
IEDICAL
SEATTLE SURGICAL G>
LLOYD P. JOHNSON, >
KEDICAL
OLYMPIC AMBULANCE
BARBARA WILLIAMS
4EDICAL
OLYMPIC AMBULANCE >
DR. SIDNEY SCHNEID>
KEDICAL
OLYMPIC AMBULANCE
BARBARA WILLIAMS
KEDICAL
SCHICK LABOROTARIES
MICHELES, PAT
KEDICAL
VIEWPOINT RECOVER >
HUTHISON, DORRIS
KEDICAL
TOBY ASSOCIATES
TOBIASON, DR. RAY
KEDICAL
OLYMPIC AMBULANCE >
SCHUMAN, ROLF
KEDICAL
KEDICAL
ROBERT MILLER
VITREORETINAL ASSO>
CLINICAL PSYCHOLO >,
EARLL, BEV
MEDICAL
NEW MEDICO
MCLEAN, ALVIN JR.
Page 1
OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC. DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'.UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
U BLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
KING COUNTY
HOUSING AUTHORITY >
CITY OF REDMOND
SNOHOMISH COUNTY P>
METRO -ETS PROJECT
CITY OF KENT
CITY OF REDMOND
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
CITY OF REDMOND
UNITED STATES POST>
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
DEPT. OF GENERAL A>
PIERCE CO. RISK MA>
CITY OF SEATTLE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF>
PORT OF TACOMA
CITY OF REDMOND
POSTAL INSPECTOR I>
METRO VAN POOL
CITY OF REDMOND
SNOHOMISH COUNTY P>
CITY OF FIFE
CITY OF PUYALLUP
PIERCE COUNTY MEDI>
PORT OF TACOMA
METRO
PIERCE COUNTY ENGI>
PIERCE COUNTY PUBL>
SOLID WASTE MANAGE>
SAMMAMISH PLATEAU >
SNOHOMISH COUNTY C>
CITY OF REDMOND
PORT OF SEATTLE
CITY OF ROY
CITY OF DES MOINES
PIERCE CO. COUNCIL
CITY OF REDMOND
PIERCE COUNTY PUBL>
PIERCE COUNTY ALLI>
PORT OF EVERETT
CITY OF BONNEY LAKE
PORT ORCHARD CITY >
PORT ORCHARD CITY >
SNOHOMISH COUNTY E>
US CUSTOMS
PIERCE COUNTY MEDI>
PIERCE COUNTY PROS>
METRO
US ENVIRONMENTAL P>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
CITY OF REDMOND
CITY OF DES MOINES
PIERCE COUNTY OFF.>
MCNEIL ISLAND CORR>
PIERCE COUNTY PROS>
INTERNAL REVENUE S>
US POSTAL SERVICE
PORT OF OLYMPIA
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
COMMUNICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION DIV.
CENTRAL SERVICES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING DEPART>
ACCOUNTING OFFICE
PHONE SERVICE
NOAA
CELLULAR ONE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
MAYOR
POLICE
CELLULAR ONE
PARK DISTRICT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
MUNICIPAL COURT
DEPT. OF PUBLIC S>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
OFFICE OF ENFORCE>
SECURITY PROJECT
FINANCE DEPT.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING OFFICE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Page 1
WILMARTH, ADA
WILMARTH, • ADA
MARGARET COPPOCK
DEE
MIKE LEVENSON
MIKE PANAGIOTGN
E. JOHNSON
FRAN HUTCHINSON
KELLY MOONEY
LLOYD BATH
JEFF SKELTON
KELLY MOONEY
KEN T. HEANY
JOHN TRENT
RICHARD RAYMOND
BILL HARPER
DYSON, LINDA .
RUDDELL, JUDGE WIL>
DES MOINES POLICE >
SKINNER, BARBARA
KORDIK, ROBIN
NEISWENDER, JOHN
PASHOVSKIS, ED
WARD, TERRY
UPTEGRAFT, DARRELL>
WEBBER, JUNE
COPPOCK, MARGARET
DONNA
PROTHMAN, GREG
SMITH, BARBARA
ROBERTS, PEGGY
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
?UBLIC DEPT.
'UBLIC DEPT.
?UBLIC DEPT.
?UBLIC DEPT.
?UBLIC DEPT.
?UBLIC DEPT.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
MERCER ISLAND DEPA>
CITY OF PUYALLUP
JUVENILE REHAB.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPM>
CITY OF WINSLOW
US POSTAL SERVICE
WESTSIDE SEWER DIS>
PIERCE COUNTY COUN>
DEPARTMENT OF PUBL>
PIERCE COUNTY OFF.>
DEPARTMENT OF JUST>
WASHINGTON ST. DEP>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY S>
CITY OF BREMERTON
DEPT. OF WILDLIFE
IMMIGRATION AND NA>
PIERCE COUNTY ENGI>
CITY OF BELLEVUE
DEPT. OF TRANSPORT>
DEPT. OF GENERAL A>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
PIERCE COUNTY ENGI>
PIERCE CO. LIBRARY>
CITY OF TUKWILA
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
TACOMA- PIERCE COUN>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY F>
CITY OF PUYALLUP
PIERCE COUNTY DEPT>
CITYOF EVERETT
PIERCE COUNTY EXEC>
PIERCE COUNTY PUBL>
SNOHOMISH COUNTY A>
PIERCE COUNTY UTIL>
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
KITSAP CITY
PIERCE COUNTY HEAL>
CITY OF SNOHOMISH
CITY OF SNOHOMISH
CITY OF SNOHOMISH
CITY OF RENTON
PIERCE COUNTY
DEPT. OF GENERAL A>
COVINGTON WATER DI>
KITSAP COUNTY DEPT>
FEDERAL EMERGENCY >
METRO
KITSAP CTY. CONSOL>
LAW ENFORCEMENT SE>
BREMERTON BLDG. DE>
CITY OF BREMERTON
PIERCE CO. COUNCIL
US FOREST SERVICE
HOSPICE & HOMECARE>
CITY OF MILL CREEK
DISTRICT OFFICE OF>
SEATTLE HOUSING AU>
CITY OF BELLEVUE
PORT OF TACOMA
CITY OF MOUNT LAKE>
CHIEF DEVENY
VENDOR PAY.
MAIN
POSTAL INSPECTOR.>
DIRECTOR OF AGRIC>
BUILDING DEPT.
NORTHERN REGIONAL>
PUBLIC WORKS /UTIL>
PROPERTY DEVELOPM>
OFFICE OF COMMUNI>
BILLING
BUSINESS LICENSE >
DEPT. OR CORRECTI>
DEPT. OF COMMUNIT>
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
DEPT. OF PUBLIC W>
STATE OFFICE OF C>
REGIONAL PUBLIC A>
HOUSING AUTHORITY
PUGET SOUND AGENCY
WATER AND UTILITI>
Page 2
LEOPOLD, LT. F.
NASH, LAWRENCE
SCOTTI, NICK
STONE, KEITH
MAPES, CHARLE 0.
NEWSHAM, L.
TODD, CHUCK
SMITH, BARBARA
LLEWELLYN, ROBERT
PETTIBONE, DR. C. >
MUMMA, DICK
NEIL, JERRY
ROFIN TWC89 -240
BALLARD, TOM
BROWNLEE, MIKE
HULL, ALLEN
CROCKETT, JAY
SCHMITT, PETER
CHAPLIN BENHAM, RI>
MERRITT, BOB.
HOLT, GARY
GRASSI, SHARON
NEIDITE, ANDREW E.
SCORCIO, JOE
HAMMOND, FRED
HARPER, BILL
PERKSOWICZ, RON
FLEENOR, ARDETH
RALSTON, JOHN
DARLYNE
NELSON, JUDY
RON
COGAN, PHILIP S
STEWARD, SUE A.
MCLAUGHLIN, NORMAN
MUMMA, DICK
MUMMA, DICK
FAIRCHILD, MARDY
WRIGHT, BETH
MCINTOSH, ELAINE
CANNELL, BRENT.
ANDERSON, RONALD
OLSEN, JULIA
ANDERSON, LYNN
CAPT. KRAHN, STAN
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
'UBLIC DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY COUN>
GELMAN, BARBRA
'UBLIC DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY COUN>
GELMAN, BARBRA
'UBLIC DEPT.
PIERCE CO. REFUSE
GRIGGS, DOROTHY
'UBLIC DEPT.
CITY OF MT. LAKE T>
KREHN, STAN
'UBLIC DEPT.
WHATCOME CO.
DICKENSON, NAT
'-UBLIC DEPT.
IMMIGRATION /NATURA>
NORTHERN REGIONAL>
'UBLIC DEPT.
PIERCE COUNTY REFU>
TRIGGS, DOROTHY
'UBLIC DEPT.
CITY OF PORT ORCHA>
MCCLUSKEY, TERRY
'UBLIC DEPT.
THURSTON COUNTY PU>
DURIG, DANIEL
'UBLIC DEPT.
CITY OF ROY
JUDGE RUDDELL, WIL>
'UBLIC DEPT.
KITSAP COUNTY
DEPT. OF ENGINEER>
WILEY, D.W.
'UBLIC DEPT.
SNOHOMISH CTY. MED>
STANSRUD, KEN
'UBLIC DEPT.
WATER DISTRICT #125
WILSON, ANN
Page 3
;OVERNMENTAL & IN>
NAME
DEPARTMENT
CONTACT
SCHOOLS
;CHOOL
;CHOOLS
;CHOOLS
;CHOOLS
;CHOOL
;CHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SCHOOLS
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
SEATTLE PUBLIC SCH>
PUYALLUP SCHOOL DI>
L.H. BATES VOCATIO>
LAKE WASHINGTON SC>
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL>
SEATTLE PUBLIC SCH>
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHO>
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHO>
HIGHLINE COMMUNITY>
EVERETT SCHOOL DIS>
SNOHOMISH SCHOOL D>
EDUCATIONAL SERVIC>
EVERETT COMMUNITY >
EDMONDS COMMUNITY >
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL>
LAKESIDE SCHOOL
GREEN RIVER COMMUN>
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC>
SHORELINE PUBLIC S>
UNIVERSITY PLACE S>
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHO>
EVERGREEN STATE CO>
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHO>
HIGHLINE PUBLIC SC>
FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL>
YELM SCHOOL DISTRI>
YELM SCHOOL DISTRI>
KENT SCHOOL DISTRI>
SUMNER SCHOOL DIST>
UNIVERSITY PLACE S>
SEATTLE SCHOOL DIS>
SEATTLE SCHOOL DIS>
LAKE WASHINGTON SC>
SEATTLE SHOOL DIST>
EVERETT SCHOOL DIS>
STATE BOARD FOR VO>
EVERETT SCHOOL DIS>
SEATTLE SCHOOL DIS>
EDMONDS COMMUNITY >
PACIFIC LUTHERAN U>
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHO>
SEATTLE SCHOOL DIS>
UNIVERSITY OF WASH>
CLOVER PARK SCHOOL>
FRANKLIN PIERCE SC>
TUMWATER SCHOOL DI>
CLOVER PARK SCHOOL>
TACOMA SCHOOL DIST>
ARLINGTON SCHOOL D>
TUMWATER SCHOOL DI>
RENTON SCHOOL DIST>
UNIV. PLACE SCHOOL>
EVERETT SCHOOL DIS>
EVERETT SCHOOL DIS>
TACOMA SCHOOL DIST>
SUMNER SCHOOL DIST>
TACOMA SCHOOL DIST>
ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DI>
FIFE SCHOOL DISTRI>
FACILITIES DEPT.
SECURITY DEPT.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
SUPPORT SVCS.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
Page 1
DUGAL EASTON
WHEELER, CHUCK
BOB NELSON
SCARR, BUDD
DUGAL EASTON
OLNEY, ED
DOYLE WINTER
SPALDING, CHUCK
AYRAULT, DAN
SMITH, NICK
LUGINBILL, GEORGE >
NEBGEN, MARY
LEALES, SUE
NUTTER, DR. GLEN
SCHMIDTKE, GERALD
DANIEL, GEORGE
FROELING, ANTONI H.
NAPOLITANO, LEW
LOUISE, MARY
SCARR, BUD OR MOBL>
LOUISE, MARY
CHRISTIANSON, MEL
JUSTICE, PATSI
JACOBSON, MERNA
EASTON, DUGAL
BLOOM, DON
SORIA, BEN
MASAKO
BISHOP, DAVID
SHIPLEY, RON
FERA, CAROLYN
SANDERS, IRENE
GARY KOHLWES
MIKE PATTERSON
SMITH, JUNIOR
SMITH, J.R.
MOHLER, WILLIAM P.
CURRIE, MIKE
CHENEY, BEVERLY J.
MATT. #032
•
NEGOTIATOR'S REPORT
STATE WASHINGTON COUNTY KING PROJECT CELLULAR TOWER SITE, OPTION /LEASES PAR. # SE 45
SOUIHCENTER
CLIENT: Interstate Mobilephone Co., %Whalen & Campany ADDRE SS:1O1 Elliott Ave, Suite 435, Seattle,WA 98119
NAME(S) of TITLE HOLDERS OF RECORD (Matial Status) RESIDENCE ADDRESS
ROSS R. WHITNEY & DAVID S. WHITNEY, A/K/A. WHITNEY BROS., a WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP
P.O. Box 459, Lakebay, WA 98349
LEASED SITE LOCATION: Corner of Nelsen P1. So. & 158 St. Td willa, WA, Vacant Lot just south of 15700 Nelsen P1 So.
(206) 884 -3529 (Residence - Unlisted)
SEND PAYMENT CHECK TO: PH. # ( 206) 884 -9253 (Office In Residence)
WHITNEY BROS, a Washington Partnership ADDRESS P.O. Box 459, Lakebay, WA 98349
NAMES OF LIEN /LEASE HOLDERS:
NONE OF RECORD ADDRESS:
NOTE ANY PERTINENT DATA NOT FOUND IN TITLE REPORT
Ross R. Whitney is the senior partner of the partnership & handles all of the business transactions. Also he
is holding a Power of Attorney from his brother David S., which is recorded in the King County, Wa records. Be
assured me that he will furnish a copy of the P /A, with submittal of the executed Option /Lease forms.
TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. S.S.# 539-42 -3113 (Ross R.) S.S.# 532 -38 -3567 (David S). Whitney Bros.Fed.l6 91- 6071003
RECORD OF OWNER /AGENT MEETINGS:
Date 10/13/89 Place RED TO DAILY CONTACT DIARY FOR ALL Offer $500.00
DATES & MEETING & CONVERSATIONS (Phone)
Present ALL MEETINGS & TRANSACTIONS VIA THE PHONE & EXPRESS MAIL Counter Offer $1,000.00 +
Date Place Offer $800;00 +
Present Counter Offer Accepted
Date Place Offer
Present Counter Offer
Date Place Offer
Present
Date Place Offer
Present
Counter Offer
Counter Offer
SETTLEMENT DATA: Agreed Amount $ 500.00 (Option) TO BE PAID: One Payment $500.00 Option Money
$ 800.00 +
Per Month $ 9,600.00 Per Year 4/ 5yr + 3 /Syr Renewals Years
ADDITIONAL REMARKS: NOIE:PLEASE REFER TO THE OPTION /LEASE FROM FOR THE PROMISES MADE, RELATIVE TO TAXES,
PROPERTY GROQING, CELLULAR PHONE, REMOVING ALL OF FACILITY AT TERMINATION, INCREASE IN RENT EACH YR.
OPTION MONEY NOT TO BE CONSIDERED FIRST M0. RENT.
DATE OF POSSESSION OF PROPERTY: Inrnediately upon receipt of first months rent.
REMARKS: (Be Specific On Main Points Of Discussion & Any Promises Made.)
All Of the time, effort spent to acquire this lease is much to enormous to.list as would it be time/ &space consunmig
list all of the people I contacted, in an attempt to secure a lease for this cell. Please:refer to the Daily
Contact Diary for more detail. The site leased however was obtained thru negotiations with W. Ross Whitney.
The bottom line of this transaction was that Mr. Whitney really was not interested in leasing us the site;, because
they had plans to construct a building on the site & a lease to us would prevent such a move. Thus the asking
price of $1,000.00 mo. + we pay all R/E tax on the parcel and a proposed sewer drainage project assessment that will
be levied against the property.
(OVER)
After many phone conversations & a r. wait for Mr. Whitney to show to.a pe nal meeting (he never showed), I
brow tt th ter to a close tr to:.call him, to say that I was not i� tsted because of his exorbitant' •
CUNT. sR�RKS: hi ashi p1 RPing rhar h;s PhnnP was tn,.sy Lwa, ;, & in the intrim I received a
mobile call fronihin. '' "When he asked how the deal as he presented it to me was progressing with the authorities-.$
Cellular One, I new I'had him where I wanted him,(Willing To Deal). I told him we were not interested because it w
was to much money: "yHe° said ,. how nuch will you pay? I asked him, whets the least you will accept ?. He said $800.00
a month + R/E taxes. I said the most I will pay is $800.00 mo. & No Taxes. Be said he would go on the $800.00 if
I would '
pay z the R/E taxes. I said I might but I would not pay any assessments. After some discussion, he agreed
to $800.00, ii R/E taxes, 20yr. lease, Increase ea. yr. 10% Max. One phone & no assessments. I cleared all of the
concessions with Steve Lewis before I agreed with Mr. Whitney. In finalization, I had the instruments prepared
in the office, having first have Stev&.L. approve the proper nomenclature relative to Mr. Whitney's demands. I
then sent them Express Mail to his residence as he instructed. Due to the time element involved with my leaving,
I instructed ;in the transmittal letter to return the properly. executed instruments to Steve L. at the Cellular
One office. ( Copy of transmittal letter in file).
SU>�IC'1'rr;D HEREWITH: 1) THE PROPERLY EXECUTED OPTION /LEASE FORMS WILL BE SENT TO STEVE LEWIS.
2) A copy of the prepared Option /Lease form, as sent to Mr. Whitney.
3) Four (4) photographs of the leased site.
4) Photos of all other potential sites.
5) All pre -title data, documenting ownership by Whitneys' of leased site.
6) Copies of transmittal letters to Mr. Whitney.
7) Renton 7.5 min. Quad, indicating coordinates of leased site; 47° 27' 41 ", 122° 14' 29"
8) Copies of Daily Contact Diary (10 pgs) relative to the work performed on this site.
9) This comprehensive Negotiators report.
10) Directional map, to find the leased site.
I, the undersigned Right of Way Agent, do hereby state the following;
1) (X) The written agreement secured as a part of this parcel, embodies all of the
considerations agreed upon between the propert owner and myself.
2) (X The agreement was reached without coercion, promises (other than those shown
in the agreement & in this report) or threats of any kind whatsoever.
3) (X) I do not have a direct or indirect, present or contemplated personal interest
in the property acquired, nor will I receive any benefit, in any form, from
the property owner(s).
4) (-9 I submit herewith, the completed parcel package, including all appurtenances
thereto..
DATE. October 26, 1989 S g
R/W Agent
OWNER:
PHONE:
TENANT:
TENANT' S ADDRESS:
PHONE:
SITE IDENTIFICATION: -6OUTH CENTER PAGE 1
llnILY
CONTACT DIARY
RECEIVED: AUG. 21, 1989
DATE: AUGUST 1989 AGENT: THOMAS 0. SINGLER
8- 21 -89: Drove to South Center site to reconnoiter the area. Called and spoke mobile with three sales -__
men from Commercial R/E Brokers, who had signs in the Industrial Park on Andover Parkway_East,__
in Tukwila. 1k4o of them said owners were not receptive to towers and the third;.Milt Reimers,
of Coldwell Banker (292- 6000), said his client might be interested. 1 explained in complete
detail the reason for my call. He said that the least available space was 1600 sq.ft.'He said
they wanted $960 mo. for rent and the 1st yr. up front. He said he'd check with his client and
get back with me. Drove to South Center Shopping Mall and spoke with Kieth Mastus L the manager.
He said there was room, and they had no problem with the hut, but had some doubt about the adverse
effect of the tower on the esthetic value of the property. He said that "money talks ", so I
should get him a lease form and he'd present it to the mall owners. From there I drove to the
east side of Green River and reconnoitered along West Valley Highway commercial area. Spoke with
several owners who were only leasing, and one who lived in Portland; another whose business was for
sale, and a 3rd who leases from the owner of the glass co. in.the rear. I spoke with Nick Sciola=
president of Hartung Glass Co., who said he did have room. He said he was in the process of
getting permits because he was going to build there, but was going to talk to his architect and
see if they could fit it in. He instructed that 'I call him back Thursday.
Then stopped at Seattle Furniture Factory, 17500 W. Valley Highway. 'the manager there said the bldg.
was owned by Alaska Copper & Brass Co. (623- 5800). I called and spoke with Brian Lucareli. Explained
in detail the reason for my call. He said I'd have to speak with Douglas Rosen on Thursday, but
that it sounded good to him.
3- 23 -89: Early A.M.: Called Gary Merlin Construction Co., 762 -9125 relative to leasing a site'. Explained
in complete detail to an administrative assistant, the reason for my call, and asked about the
possibility of leasing a 50x50 spot at their batch plant on Valley Hgwy. She said they would be
interested, but that the power company easement makes them already crowded and they have no space.
She suggested I try north a little further between Andy's Diner and Jack -in- the -Box, where there
appears to be open space.
(OVER)
Page 2
• WN I . REMARKS: cont. from pg. 1:
-24-89: Early A.M.: Me a mobile call to Douglas Rosen, owner of Seattle Furniture Factory on W. Valley Rd.
n detail the reason for my call and told him we needed 50x50, or 2500 sq.ft. and offered him
111
$ d that it sounded alright to him and said he'd like to see a copy of the option. I told him
I'd fax it to him: 382-7335. I called Steve and told him to do it right away, since he had the option
there, and that it was to be for lyr. at $500. Steve said he would do it right away.
1-28-89: •alled and spoke with Doug Rosen relative to the option/lease. He questioned
tr increase every 5 yrs, and said that his property leases increased every year
ni he wanted the same. I told him I could have that approved for yearly increase
YX, min. and. 5X, max. de ten questioned a 50 yr. lease aaI said it was too long.
elained the FCC rule for long term leases to protect telophone users, and he
u !rstood. Ile said he'd like to discure:t it further with attorney, and I
• uld call him tomorrow, ,and hoped we could put it together. I also made several
w .mpts to call Nick Sciola, at Hartung Glass Co. but he wrIfl always unavailable.
he late P.M., I.received a mobile call from Jeff Crane cr Coldwell Banker. He
• t that he'd been in contact with Milt Reimers , a co-agent whom I had been talking
about leasing a site in the Industrial Park area at 3our,h Center. He said he
hr. worked with the other acquisition team that ms h •- involved in one that
w ted 1060 per mo. for 404 sq.ft.. He wanted to know what was going on. I told him
was too much money and that. I had found 2 other suitabt sites for $500. He
and to know where, but 1 wouldn't toll him. I did tell h;m I'd check with our
• ce _
and see what was going on with his client, and let hiw know if they were
,rested. He said our office has a copy of the lease that is already prepared
a: .960. I ask him if that amount is firm, and he said he nldn't think so; that
be if we made another offer, they would take less money, but not g500. He
• the high price was because of the placing of the tower Ind its effect on the
etics. I told him, that in my opinion, the tower would '.;e an asset to tie
.1r. -.1.2trial Park, because all industry' vrlzits to know that co.: !ular is available
fey -their executives and austomers. He agreed with this. I .old him I'd discuss
.1.••■•••••••■•••••••••••••............
i! with the proper authorities and get back with him.
8-29-89: P.M.: Jeff Crane, of Coldwell Banker, returned my earlier call; I told him I had 2 potential sites lined
up at $500 ea. He kept pushing to know where they were. I told him only that...
Cont. on Pg. 3
cont. from Pg. 2...
Page 3.
they were 50x50. I did, however, tell him that Cellular One had sate moral obligation to his client, and if
they could ac least net that money, or come to $700 that maybe we could sit down and talk to his client.
Later he called back and said they wouldn't take less than $960. "At least •etried." I called Steve to
bring him up to date, and he said Crane had tried to call him. LAte P.M.: Received a call from Doug Rosen,
who 3aid he is havinedifficulty with accepting the 31.) yr. lease, and that he needed to talk with his atty.
yet, and didn't want to be rushed. I told him was going out of town for two weeks and that I'd Check back
with him when I got back, if I hadn't founLsomething else i.n th meAntime, A it laseicrleff&raae_called
back again and wanted to know if there was sumethin&that Could be done to_save the deal. He kept seterriag .
to 0.4ayne Carrowayt_whom he said was an acquisition man for McCaw. I, said i had never heard of him and that
any dealings that were gointto be dope had-to be done with Me, not this Carrowm or Steve Lewis. He suggested
that I call his client and see why they wanted $960. 1 told him I didn't care why they wanted that amount;
chat we are.not interested. Then he to/d me of this Carroway's back up site elan with him; 900 scL.ft. on
top a 60' bldg. for $1000010.. I *him why we'd pay $1000'when wewon'tpay $960. He then said he'd do more
checking around and call me back tomorrow.
8-30-89: P.M.: Drove to South Center, with a copy of a Tukwilla City plat map, showiBg area where towers are
permItted, and reconnoitered our cell site area within the city's area. Stu2d and looked at a piece of
prLycrcy north of Jack-inthe-Box Restaurant on Wesc Valley Rd. Spoke _with a man on the property who said
4
clia all this land belongs to Helen B. Nelsen, who lives across the highway up at the intersection, so I drove
up there Co speak with her. She is quite elderly, but sharp as a tack, and says she doesn't sell any of her
kind - just leases it; that way she can keep a finger on it. 1 explained what I warmed and where we'd
1ik, to be. She said she had a parcelof land south of Auction Bldg. Parking lot, between power line eaSeaent
and the railroad, that would work. I told her we neOed 50x50 and would pay her $500 mo. When we looked over
the Insurance, she said She wanted $1 million and a 5% increase in rent each yr. I told her we pay with
,the CPI with 3% min - 5% max. After same discussion, she agreed with that. We discussed tila30 yr. lease, and
1 cxplained the FCC ruling and she agreed with that. I gave her a Review Copy with points included as we had
discussed and I told her I'd be back on Sept. 16. She said that would be fine; she would talk to her atty.
and make notes on points to be dhanged. I cautioned her that I cannot $hange the lenth of the lease. She asked
aw1.1 how much the option was, and when 1 told her .$500, she said that was to be option and NOT.the 1st mo.
p,ave her Steve Lewis' name .and number.toeall if she had any questions while I was gone. I then took a
p. Lure of the proposed site, set the coordinates and called them into Steve. He called back and said they
were good and we had a good site. He also said that if Jeff Crane were to call him, he would tell Jeff that
D.4w;ne Carroway was off the project and I was working on it.
late P.M. Received a mobile call from Jeff Crane again relative to whether or not we were interested in
either of the sites he had: one at $960 mo. or the other at $1000 m.. I told him we were not interested.
Fle asked about Dwayne Carroway and I repeated to him that 1 was in complete charge of acquiring the
site and I was not interested in either site.
8/30/89 Early A.M. 1 taTke0 to S eve .incident to the R4ogrlu11Ehitsite. In summation to
our conversation, he in?lty4tt4,1t1.#1, LkeeLii 1Voract with Mrs. Nelsen, via phone
Page 4
Cw:i. REMARKS: during w time in Ohio (from 9/1/- 9/15/89), I assured him that_I_would._...-
& keep him informed of the progress. He said that he had received word from_
people in marketing that they wanted this cite ASAP. I reminded him that Mrr. Nelsen wanted
to meet with her atty. & agent, before giving me a definite answer. She said that she _..
would be ready to meet with me upon my return to work on /16/89. I WILL KEEP IN\TOUCH WITH
HER IN THE INTERIM.
9- 16-89: As preplanned, I met with Mrs. Helen Nelsen at her home,_relative..to Srn,rl_ Center site-r -- We discussed ....
in detail, the possibility of leasing .the site. She..saici that.. as _of..yet, the people_of_ the. Embassy -
Suite Ho><eb._had..n9 jnade...&deoission..as_ to._how.much lantL tbey needed and rhPy re in
acquiring the Auction iarn`propeIrty. _lte.said_that she would he n et ng with her _atto y-on 14es, and-her --
agent on Wed., and that I should call her or visit her on Thurs., and she'd tell me for sure: yes nr nn ._..
She said that if we do lease, it would have to be south, a bit further than we had originally discuss_ed,...
She also reminded me again that option money was to be option money and not the first month's rent. I...
then attempted to find another site, and found an empty lot at_NE corner of Strander Blvd_.- &_West_Valley_..
Highway, and will call Valerie Pratt of the title company to come up with an owner. Other sourees chesl1ed
this date: 1) gas Station on W. Valley.Hgw. across from Mrs. Nelsen: Lease 1- 800 -732 -1073 or Sale 624 -5900
2) Furniture Factory, 15660 Nelsen P1. S. 225 -5566: John Chen. 3)RDR Corp. 15700 Nelsen P1. S. (Rawson),
228 -9988, Terry or Duncan. 4) Vacant Land on Nelsen, behind 15616 W. Valley Hgw. (old nursery)
5) Hampton Inn, EBCO Inc. (208) 343 -3439.
9- 19-89: P.M.: Drove to South Center to attempt _finding_an_alternate._site,. as I'm not._sure_Mrs_ Nelsen wll_.sign...
I talked to several _property owners on Nelsen Place S., all to no avail. Drove back into Longacre
Racetrack and saw a possible site location in their large west parking: lot on the west side of the
railroad track.
9- 20-89: A.M.: Drove to South Center and met with Mrs. Helen Nelsen. She said she would lease to us only if we agreed
to move the facility any time she might want to develope that property. I told her that was not feasible
because of FCC regulations and the costs involved, so she didn't want to lease. I then drove to the
racetrack and met with Mr. Mike O'Donin, Genreal Manager. I explained in complete detail, what I
wanted to do. He was very receptive. We drove to the back of the parking lot, along side of the railroad
tracks, where we'd want to be, and he said there'd be no problem with that. I told him we'd offer
$400, but he said that it wasn't enough. I told him we could go to $500 and he thought that would
do it. I left a copy of the lease and he said he would discuss it with the proper authorities and
I should meet with him again on Friday. I set the coordinates, and called them in to Tammy at the office.
She called later and said -they were O.K.
9- 22 -89: Early A.M. I called Valerie Pratt of TransAmerican Titifb and requested the necessary information on
the racetrack property. At 10:0000 aspreeplanned, I met with Mr. O'Donin at the racetrack. He said
the meeting with th uthorities had been postponed until today, and that I should call him tomorrow.
He said the main concerns would be if our transmissions would interfer with their reception of satellite
pictures. I assured him that it would not interfer, and that we would be willing to include that in the
lease option as assurance. He said there may be some development in that area in the future, but he
did not think it would bother us there. He requested a phone and I assured him that if we could put
things together, I would see that he had a phone but that he would have to sign for 1 yr. and pay
installations. CONT. ON PAGE 5
OWNER:
PHONE:
TENANT:
TENANT'S ADDRESS:
PHONE:
D
SITE 11)EN'I'I1'I CATION :
DAI LY
CONTACT DIARY
UTH CENTER PAGE 5
DATE: AGENT:
Cont. from Page 4.
He said he would be in the office by 9:00 on Sat. and I should call him..
9- 23-89: As preplanned, I met with Mike O'Donin at the racetrack. He said that the powers had had their
meeting and he foresees no problem. They had discussed how they'd handle a key for our acre cs and
secondly that their TV technicians wanted to double check that our frequencies would not inrerfer.
with their transmissions. I again assured him that we'd put into the agreement that there wr 1d be no
interference. He instructed that I net with him or call on Monday_ about 10:30.
9- 24 -89: Called TransAmerica and ordered deeds and easements for racetrack properties. Later went _to the
Bellevue office and picked then up. Irene had difficult} ince there were so many. I then called mobile
to Mike O'Donin at the track to check with him per his instructions_ He said that they'd need__$625
per month beriise they will have to have a security guard on call during night hours if we should
need access;
He said that their legal department is now giving the lease
their perusal and he should have a direct answer by Thursday. He also clarified for me the ownership
sold out to them:(Broadacres
...AA I- 11.41-
9-26-89:. Steve Lewis called me early to tell me that Jeff Crane of Coldwell Banker called him relative to the
So. Center site. He told me to call him and keep him on the string as long as possible. I then called
Crane to ask him to look into the triangluar property on the end of Bldg. 8 in the industrois k center.
I offered $500 for 2900+ sq.ft. and told him to get back to me when he had something. I then called
Mike O'Donin at the racetrack to inform him that we'd go with the increase in money and getting him his
phone, but that the FCC said we nest have access without worry about finding secruity guards at odd
times. He said there would be no trouble, as they'd cut another lock into the gate chain. I related
this information to Steve and he said that was fine. I then called Bob Meyers, engineer at the race-
track to give him the name of Cellular One's technician if he needed it, but he thanked ne and said
he didn't need it.
9-28-89: 9 :00, as__preplanned2 j ne at "the racetrack with Mike O'DOnen _ 1_,Tack Anderson, ..V.P_...and..
Financial Director.. Their concern was possible interference on their•T.V. transmission.
I assured them once again that we would put into writing)that.therg'd be no interferance.....lbey
reconfirmed that they wanted $625 nn. and wanted 15% increase per .yr._._I__said...that_the .money..was
no problem, ana we could give the a nuninum of 3% and Maxinun of 5% ea. yr.
(OVER)
(:()N,T-, REMARKS:
t 4.49 •
111/ Page 6
They arrepted_that. We also agreed to scarify the land if we should leave for any reason. He told ne
.jJft
t 50x50 o I did and took s e ictures. Mr. O'Dbnin can back to see where we
would be and I gave him a picture. He said the V.P. had already contacted the attorney and they would know
something tomorrow or Monday. I told him I'd call on Monday and he said he'd call me if he heard anything__
sooner_
10-2-89: As instructed I called Mike O'Donin. He said that the Vice President and President will be coming_in_on_ _ .. .
Wednesday, and he wanted them to see where I had staked off, and that I am to call them on Thursday.
10-5-89: P.M.: Spent the afternoon reconnoitering area for an alternate site, if the racetrack doesn't go.
Spoke again with Mike O'Dbnin, at the track, but he said he hadn't heard anything yet; that they are
waiting for answer from the lawyer. I also spoke with real estate agent, Ph: 624-5900, relative to
a FOR LEASE sign on an abandoned gas station on West Valley Highway, but he said they were not interested
in leasing anything but the whole property.
10-13-89: Early A.M.: Called Jim Anderson and Mike O'Donin at the racetrack. They said they wanted a clause in
the lease, relative to interference with their transmission being corrected. I said there was no problem
with thatand that we were-willing to go to a 20 yr. lease. Mike said that was fine and that at 1:00,
I should stop and pick up the clauses typed as they wanted them, for insertion into the lease.
At 1:00, as preplanned, I net with Mr. O'Donin at the track. He said they had had their meeting at
11:30 and now he says the opposite of what he tolaime on the phone this morning. He said the President
and the Vice-Presidents decided they didn't want to tie up the property in the back, because they are
entertaining ideas of selling it and didn't want to jeopardize any sale. I called Steve to inform
him of this newest developement, and then called Jeff Crane of Coldwell Banker, relative to the possible
site at the Industrial Park. He was not in, so I left word for him to call me. I then took a look at
the area west of the railroad track and north of Racetrack Drive; called Nelson Place So., a small
industrial complex. Stopped at Mueller Brass, where the secreatary told me the property was owned by
Ross Whitney, of WhitneyBros. in. Lake Bay, WA. Ph: 884-9253. I then went to the business directly
to the south and was told that Whitney owns the whole strip of buildings, including a 200x300 sq.ft.
vacant lot at the south end that would be ideal for our needs. I was unable to contact Mr. Whitney
but will continue to try. Later that afternoon, I called again and his secretary said that he was
away on business until late Mbnday, but she would give him my message when he called in tomorrow, and
I should try again on Tuesday. LATE P.M.: Received a call from Jeff Crane. He said that he saw
no change in his client's position relative to that spot I had enquired about. He said they would
want $950 - $1000, if they even would lease...he will check and get back with me Mbnday.
10-17-89: Called and spoke with Mk. Ross Whitney, owner of the property in South Center search ring. He said
he was interested, but a 30 yr. lease was too long and a 5% max on the CPI on rent increase was not
enough because of inflation. He said he negotiates with his tenants every 5 yr. and it works out.
I called Steve on the matter and he agreed on 20 yr. lease and would go along with a 10% Cap on theCPI.
Later in the day, I was able to contact Mr. Whitney again. I told him that my authorities agreed to
his demands. We went over the form roughly on the phone. He wanted the option money to be just option
Continued on Page 7.
OWNER:
PHONE:
TENANT:
TENANT'S ADDRESS:
PHONE:
Page .7
SITE IDEN'1'IrICA'1'IOL.:' SOUTH CENTER
DAILY
CONTACT DIARY
DATE: October 1989
CONTINUED FROM PAGE .6..
AGENT: THCMAS 0. SIMMER
money and not the. 1st mo. rent, and he also asked for a telephone. I said I thought I could
arrange that, but he would have to pay for installation and the service for at least one yr.
To this he agreed, and asked that I send him a copy of the lease option. I told him that I
would like to sit down with him and go over it in detail and would be available tomorrow if
he could fit it in his schedule. He said he could because he had to go to Gig Harbor and I
could net him there. We made arrangements to net at 11:00 tomorrow.
Wed. 10- 18 -89: At the appointed time, I drove to Gig Harbor for my 11:00 meeting with Mr. Whitney. I waited
at the shopping center for 4 hours, but he did not show up. I made several calls during that
time, to his secretary to inquire,of his where abbouts.
She said he told her he had an appointment with me, but that he was going to the doctors first.
She didn't understand what happened. At 3:00 I called again and told her I was leaving and if
she heard from him, she should call me. At 4:00 she called and said he had been detained
at the doctor's and was then sent. to the hospital for tests. He said he would call me this
evening. At 8:00 P.M., Mr. Whitney called and apologized for missing our meeting and asked
that I mail him a review copy of the prepared instrument for his perusal, and he will take care
of it immediately.
Thur. 10- 19-89: Early A.M.: Sent, via U.S. MAIL EXPRESS, a review copy of the lease option to M. Whitney, at
his home. Then went to TransAmerican Title Co. in Bellevue to get title information on Whitney's
property for the So. Center site. They were able to give me tax information and an assessor's plat
map, but could not find the deed. I called Mrs. Whitney and she gave me the approximate date of
transfer from the father's name to Ross and his brother, and told me to call Mr. W. I did, and he
gave me the name of his lawyer and told me to call him: Mr. Liebman of Franco, Asia, Ben Sussen & Coe.
Ph: 624 -5622. When I spoke with Mr. Liebman to get the number from the reference deed, he was very
•
curt and told me it was too early in the negotiations to need a deed description. I told him I wanted
to be able to assure my people that we had the true owner of the property. He said we had a long way
to go; that they were going to build a 5000 sq.ft. building there and we'd have to compensate for
•
•
the loss of rental income from that before we could finalize any deal...and he hung up.
(ovER)
. REMARKS:
•
Page 8.
THUR. 10- 19-89: P.M. Drove to Tukwilla to visit with Mrs. Nelsen. Before I went in, I called Steve to
see what the least space we'd need if we used a monopole. I explained to Mrs. Nelsen what I'd like to do
there, and what changes I could make in regards to the size of the area needed. I explained that we would
need 25x40 and would give her $500 mo.with a yearly increase with an 8% CAP. She said that certainly looked
better than a 3-5 % She repeatedly emphasized the fact.that she was reluctant to lease any space in the
original area until after Embassy Suites Hotel determines haw much parking space they will need. She will
not do anything to jeopardize their plan. I told her our facility would cause no problem to their parking
plans. I reiterated my statement that I was sure Embassy Suites would be more than willing to have us close
to their property so they could advertize to their guests that cellular service is available. She said that
makes a lot of sense. She showed me where the property was and said that we could get into it, but that she
couldn't do anything until her agent, an 80 yr. old man who has worked for years for her, returns to town
on Oct. 29. So we'll have to wait until then. This woman is.a very dear sweet lady; very alert, easy to
talk to and most capable of conducting any and all business transactions. I think if someone takes their
time and works with her, she would give us a lease.
I then drove to Andy's Diner and spoke with the General Manager, who said we'd have to speak with the owner;
Andy Yourcanon, PH: 624 -4097. I made several attempts to reach him to no avail. With the way the diner sits
and the per line easement behind, there would be no room anyway.
From there, I moved to 16th Street, north of the racetrack, south of Highway 405, and found a dilapitated
piece of property, with a dog chained in the yard. No one was at home, but I was told by a neighbor that it
•
was owned by the racetrack, so I called Mike O'Donin at the track. He said that particular property was not
theirs. I called Eilene at TransAmerican Title Co. and gave her the location and asked her to see if she cola
find out who the owner was. She said it would be ready tomorrow.
FRI. 10- 20-89: Went to TransAm. and spoke with Eilene. She said they still haven't found the title for the
WHitney property, but will continue looking. She did, however, give me a property profile for the property
at 1212 16th St. in Renton. It is owned by Longacres Joint Venture, 921 Middle Fork Rd., Onalaska, WA.
Still thinking this was the racetrack, I tried to call Mike O'Donin again to see if we could lease there,
but he was busy, so I'll have to call him back.
Eilene also gave me a copy of the tax assessor's plat map on Mrs. Nelsen's property, but said she couldn't
find the deed yet, because it was so old, and will continue to look upstairs in the files.
I then received a call from Ross Whitney. He said he had discussed the lease option he had received in the
mail, with his brother and their lawyer. They decided that by signing the lease, they would thereby loose
any rent they would have realized from a building they were planning to build there.. They therefore wanted
$1000 a mo. rent. He said there were a few other things they wanted adjusted in the lease, but that we could
take care of them after the financial question was settled. I told him I could not make that decision, but
that I would take it up with the proper authorities. I said I didn't think they would go for it, but all
I could do was present it to them. I then called Steve and explained the situation to him. He said we should
pay $500 for an option with hopes we'll sign Mrs. Nelsen later. Mr. Whitney then called me back to tell me
that the $1000 was net. I asked hiin what he meant, and he said that we would have to pay the real estate tax
OWNER:
PHONE:
TENANT:
TENANT'S ADDRESS:
PHONE:
DATE:
PAGE 9
• •
SITE IDENTIFICATIOL•. SQUT1-I Carla
DAILY
CONTACT DIARY
OCTOBER
CONT. FROM PAGE 8
AGENT: THOMAS 0. SINGLER
because all his tenants do. I told him that I do not think our people will do it. He said I
should talk to my people and get back to him. I asked him if $1000 was the least he would take and he
said yes.
SAT. 10- 21 -89: Late A.M.: Again reconnoitered the area of South Center. Returned to 1212 16th St. in Renton,
north of the racetrack. The occupant said that he paid his rent to the Pasco Realty Co. in Renton.
I drove there and spoke with John Tharp, 423 So. Third St. Renton, Ph: 255 -1541. I explained in
detail the reason for my visit and told him we'd pay $400 for 35-x45 sq. ft. He said he'd get
in touch with the owner and tell him of the offer. I told him we'd like to be in the back corner,
near Interstate 405 and he said that would be good because it would not tie up the rest of the
property . He said I should call him on Tuesday. (Coordinates: 47 -27 -59 122- 13 -56)
ION: 10- 23 -89: Early A.M. Called Eilene at the title co. relative to the Whitney and Nelsen properties for the
So. Center site. She said they were ready and I could pick them up. At 8:30 PM I made phone
contact with Mr. Whitney about the property on Nelson Place. Upon questioning, he said that we
do have access to the entire lot south of the parking lot for the Ross Drug Bldg. He said the
taxes would be approx. $580 and yr. and there would be an assessment for a new drainage system
by the Tukwilla City Public Works Dept. but he doesn't know how nuch it will be because it hasn't
been levied yet. He also said that if we put up any building, other than the hut site, the rent
will go up, and at the end of the 20 yr. lease, we'd have to tear it down or leave it for their
use. He then asked what the next move would be, and I told him I'd present the situation to the
proper authorities and they'd make the decision as to whether or not they would option for a
year at $500. I told him I'd get back with him.
TUE: 10= 24 -89: P.M. Received a call from Mr. John Tharp of Pasco Realty to let me know tha a had contacted the
owner of the land at 1212 16th St. in Renton, and that they were interested in leasing. He said
they wanted to see something in writing, so I told him I would prepare a lease option for review
and deliver it to his office tomorrow. I called Steve to tell him of the possible option and he
said they had not as yet gotten to check the coordinates, but that I should continue persuing this
possibility without the coordinates.
Continued on Pg. 10 - over...
• •
CON ! . REMARKS : continued from Pg. 9 - on reverse
WED. 10-25-89: Early A.M.: Received a call from Ross Whitney asking what the status is relative to lease option
negotiations. I said we were not going to lease from him because $1000 plus WE tax and water assessment
is too much money and we will not pay it. I told him we had another site at $400. Be hemmed a bit and asked
what the meta we would pay, would be. I asked him what the least he would take would be. When he said $800
.I told him that was the most we'd pay; if we did it! I told him I'd go back to the authorities and see what
I could do. I told him we wouldn't pay the tax, but he suggested that we split them. I told him we would
only split that portion where we'd have the site, and that we would not pay the water assessment, to which
he agreed, but added that the other negotiated items remain the same, including the telephone. I told him
._that I'd get back with him. I then called Steve mobile and explained it to him. Be told me to sign him up.
I went into the office, where we went over the wording for the insertions and Rosemary typed it all up.
I drew up Exhibit "B ". In reading the description, it became very difficult to decipher, so I called Mr.
Whitney. Be cleared up the names on the deed and the position his brother holds. He said that he had
._power of attorney for his brother and would sign for him. They did business as Whitney Brothers, so the
lease was made out that way1with am' a.k.a.Ross and David Whitney. Be also read the deed over the phone
to Rosemary, who typed it in. I called Eilene at the title company and had_her FAX the missing_part_of the
deed to our office. When all was prepared, I wrote a transmittal letter and sent the package to Mr. W.
via EXPRESS MAIL. I also called Mrs. Whitney and asked her to tell her husband that it was on the way.
I also left instructions with Mr. Whitney, by phone and in the lease package written instructions to
return the signed two (2) originals via Express Service to Steve Lewis at Cellular One, 101 Elliott Ave.
•
HcCAW CELL -1 ANALYSIS A.W.GUY 14, JULY 1989
1
Analysis of Potential Health Effects of Radio - Frequency Electromagnetic
Radiation From The Proposed Communications Antennas at. Cellular -1
4th and Pike Building Site, Seattle, Washington
by
Arthur W. Guy, ph.D.
Professor and Associate Director
Center for Bioengineering
University of Washington
SUMMARY
This is a report of the estimated radio frequency (RF) pover densities
and potential health effects in the environment of the Cellular -1 4th. and
Pike building site after installation of 4 cellular communications system
transmitting antennas at each site. The report was requested by Mr. Merle
S. Cox of McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc. (MCCI). The purpose of this
report is to 1) quantify in detail the radiation levels 5 feet above the
roof and 5 feet above the top floor of the building below the penthouse
where the proposed cellular communication system antennas will be mounted
and 2) compare the radiation levels with existing maximum permissible human
exposure standards and the thresholds for biological effects as reported in
the peer reviewed scientific literature. The background and description of
the site is described in reports, drawings and antenna brochures provided to
the author by Mr. Cox and colleagues of HCCI. Finally a description of the
antennas, antenna characteristics, antenna locations, and radiation patterns
were contained in the documents provided to the author by MCCI.
The detailed analysis has shown that the maximum possible power density
at the roof of the site would be 10.9 uW /cm2. The analysis also has shown a
maximum possible pover density of 2.26 uW /cm2 above the floor of the top
story of the from RF radiation through the concrete roofs. The calculations
were made for a height of 5 feet above the surfaces of the roof and floor of
the top storie of the building at the site to insure quantification of
maximum levels where people are exposed. This position of highest
calculated power density at the roof of the building was located
• •
HcCAU CELL -1 ANALYSIS A.U.GUY 14, JULY 1989 2
approximately 10 feet southwest of the southwest side of the penthouse upon
which the antennas were mounted. The position of maximum estimated power
density above the floor of the top story of the 4th and Pike building site
was approximately 30 feet southwest of the southwest side of the penthouse.
All calculated levels of radiation at the site were found to be below the
thresholds of harmful biological effects as reported in the peer reviewed
literature and below thresholds of all of the maximum permitted human
exposure standards of the United States as shown by the bar graph in Figure
1. A scatter plot of calculated radiation levels for the roof of the site
is shown in Figure 2. In order to conveniently reference the positions
where calculations were made a rectangular coordinate system oriented as
shown in Figure 2. was used with the x axis parallel with the southwest
side of the building and the y axis parallel with the southeast side of the
building. All azimuths were specified with respect to the direction of the
y axis. The dotted lines running parallel with the y axis denote positions
where calculations were made. A calculation of power density was made at
the position of the dots spaced at a distance of 5 feet apart. Values of
calculated power density are printed at selected locations. Values of power
density were not calculated for inside of the penthouse. Figure 3 provides
similar information for 5 feet above the floor of the top story of the
building site. Figure 4. illustrates the power density along the main beam
of antenna number 3 when it is directed due southeast to simultate worst
case conditions for determining maximum possible exposure levels of adjacent
buildings.
The rationale and theory used for making the calculations are discussed
in detail in the report sent to you on May 24, 1989 intitled "Analysis of
Potential Health Effects of Radio - Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation from
the Proposed Communications .Antennas at Cellular -1 Vest Seattle and Denny
Terrace Sites, Seattle, Washington" dated May 22, 1989.
c0
c
cD
G \ J
D- O
c -o
w
> N•
o
O
Cl
(1) 0
sa)
0
cD
c
o
1
O
ZIT
(D
N
Q
CD
CT
c
Q
5
cri
rn
v
o0
CALCULATED POWER DENSITY (µW /cm 2 )
0
1 1 1 11..1
0
0
THRESHOLD BIOEFFECTS
ANSI, NCRP
THRESHOLD BIOEFFECTS
NIOSH
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JJ 0
... 1 ...1 1 1 1
EXPOS STANDAR
NCRP, MASS
LEVEL
AT ROOF
MAXIMUM LEVEL 5' ABOVE FLOOR OF
TOP STORY
}
W
J
.446 .610 .893 1.41 2.56 4.06 5.98 6.08 5.78 7.81 7.00
4TH AND PIKE BUILDING
PENTHOUSE ANT #3
ANT #2
.458 . .605 .831 * 1.19 1..65 2• .48 7• .33
.483 .663 .978 1.54 2.75 5• .57 9• .898
ANT #1
10.9
4.81
9.87 7.34
110-Y
7.29 8.79 6.65
3.22
5.38 6.27 7.44 5.86
TX
7.82 9.05 7.81 5.64 . 4.63 3.94
5.55 6.13 5.68 4.58 3.70 3.11
. . . . . . . . . . .
883 1.18 1.51 1.90 2.31 2.59 2.72 2.67 2.50 2.19 1.95
5 feet between tic marks
1.07 1.01 1.08 1.24 1.36 1.45 1.50 1.51 1.46 1.38 1.2E
PIKE STREET
FOURTH AVENUE
N
Figure 2. Calculated power density (µW /cm 2) at 5 feet above roof of 4th and Pike
building due to three McCaw - Cellular -1 communications antennas
.245 .323 .431 .573 .784 1.15 1.36 1.27 1.49 1.96 2.17
4TH AND PIKE BUILDING
PENTHOUSE
ANT #3
ANT #2
ANT#1
1.98 2.11 2.26
.922 1%
• .220 .267 ' .324 ' .349 .365 .449 ' 1.17 '.60 1.49 ' 1.97 2.21
234 .296 .387 .475 .597 1.07 1.63 1.09 1.31 1.84 '2.08
}
J
J
X
1.82 1.99 ' 1.91 ' 1.81 1.74 1.64
1.99 2.13 2.06 1.79 ' 1.56 1.41
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.462 .608 .767 .946 1.13 1.25 1.30 1.29 1.22 1.10 .99E
5 feet between tic marks
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.403 .481 .567 .654 .715 .761 .789 .794 .767 .726 .669
PIKE STREET
FOURTH AVENUE
Figure 3. Calculated power density (µW /cm 2) at 5 feet above floor of top story of
4th and Pike building due to three McCaw - Cellular -1 communications
antennas.
N
• •
-110 6.77
- 100
- 90
-80
CD
W • 70
0
Z
- 60
-
- 50
- 40
- 30
- 20
8.15
10.0
• N
E
12.6
16.2 >-
v)
Z
21.7 lLl
0
CC
w
30.5
0
a_
45.5
74.1
134.
4TH AND PIKE BUILDING
-10
PENTHOUSE
195.
- 0
ANT #3
ANT #1
ANT #2
Figure 4. Calculated power density as a function of distance from
antenna #2 along center of main beam.
FOURTH AVENUE
.).Lc rulalyJlb - H.W. is- ,Jul-6V
1
TABLE 1. CHARACIIPISTICS OF CELLULAR --1 4TH AND PIKE SITE ANTENNAS USED IN POKER DENSITY CALCULATTCNS
(DATE 13-JU, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
Ant Length Service Antenna Type Freq. Azimuth Dist. Height Eff Rad Gain Azim Elev
No. of Ant .Res Ref From R of Ant Power (dipo) of Beam of Beam
(feet) (MHz) (deg) (feet) (feet) (kW) (db) (deg) (deg)
1 10.1 CEL Cpl KATHREIN 740198 840.000 0.0 0.0 5.70 0.040 9.00 0.00 0.00
2 2.0 CEL 01 KAZHREIN 40217 840.000 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.190 9.00 0.00 0.00
3 2.0 CEL a1 KATHREIN 40217 840.000 147.5 13.0 0.00 0.190 9.00 90.00 0.00
4 2.0 CEL Chi KATI-IREIN 40217 840.000 174.1 11.0 6.00 0.190 9.00 270.00 0.00
w.i -i yu.n & eixe Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul-89 2
TABLE 2. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE ROOF OF CELLULAR-1 4TH AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13 -JUL -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOO
-15.00 -75.00 191.31 76.49 -23.50 6.05E -02 4.03E -03 7.68E --02 3.05E -01 4.46E -01
-15.00 -70.00 192.09 71.59 -23.50 6.22E -02 4.60E -03 8.09E -02 3.66E -01 5.14E -01
-15.00 -65.00 192.99 66.71 -23.50 6.99E -02 5.31E-03 8.57E -02 4.49E-01 6.10E -01
-15.00 -60.00 194.04 61.85 -23.50 7.90E-02 6.18E-03 9.04E-02 5.59E-01 7.35E -01
-15.00 -55.00 195.26 57.01 -23.50 8.99E-02 7.28E-03 9.48E -02 7.01E -01 8.93E -01
-15.00 -50.00 196.70 52.20 -23.50 1.03E -01 8.68E-03 9.75E -02 8.92E-01 1.10E+00
-15.00 -45.00 198.43 47.43 -23.50 1.18E -01 1.05E1 -02 9.62E-02 1.18E+00 1.41E+00
-15.00 -40.00 200.56 42.72 -23.50 1.37E-01 1.29E-02 9.25E -02 1.66E+00 1.91E+00
-15.00 -35.00 203.20 38.08 - 23.50 1.59E -01 1.66E-02 8.99E-02 2.29E+00 2.56E+00
-15.00 -30.00 206.57 33.54 -23.50 1.85E -01 2.29E-02 7.42E -02 2.94E+00. 3.22E+00
- 15.00 -25.00 210.96 29.15 -23.50 2.14E -01 3.27E-02 3.63E -02 3.78E+00 4.06E +00
-15.00 -20.00 216.87 25.00 -23.50 2.47E-01 4.97E-02 2.55E -02 4.79E+00 5.11E+00
-15.00 -15.00 225.00 21.21 -23.50 2.67E -01 9.61E -02 2.15E -02 5.60E+00 5.98E+00
- 15.00 -10.00 236.31 18.03 -23.50 2.91E-01 1.64E -01 2.13E-02 5.70E+00 6.18E+00
-15.00 -5..00 251.57 15.81 -23.50 3.08E -01 3.46E-01 2.49E-02 5.41E+00 6 .08E+00
-15.00 0.00 270.00 15.00 -23.50 3.14E-01 8.13E-01 3.30E-02 4.48E+00 5.64E+00
-15.00 5.00 288.43 15.81 -23.50 3.08E -01 1.89E+00 4.28E -02 3.50E+00 5.75E+00
-15.00 10.00 303.69 18.03 -23.50 2.91E -01 3.66E+00 6.61E -02 2.77E+00 6.78E+00
-15.00 15.00 315.00 21.21 -23.50 2.67E-01 5.32E+00 7.50E -02 2.15E+00 7.81E+00
- 15.00 20.00 323.13 25.00 -23.50 2.47E-01 5.98E+00 8.00E -02 1.55E+00 7.85E+00
-15.00 25.00 329.04 29.15 -23.50 2.14E-01 5.54E+00 8.69E-02 1.16E+00 7.00E+00
-15.00 30.00 333.43 33.54 -23.50 1.85E-01 4.94E+00 9.01E -02 8.82E-01 6.09E+00
0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 -23.50 3.91E -01 3.62E -01 3.62E+00 4.39E-01 4.81E+00
0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 -23.50 4.16E -01 8.17E+00 2.82E-01 6.59E-01 9.53E+00
0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 -23.50 5.63E-01 9.42E+00 3.36E-01 6.16E-01 1.09E+01
0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 -23.50 3.14E -01 8.98E+00 3.27E -01 6.00E-01 1.02E+01
0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 -23.50 2.76E-01 8.74E+00 3.04E -01 5.49E-01 9. Q7E+00
0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 -23.50 2.47E -01 8.02E+00 2.70E -01 4.59E-01 8.99E+00
0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 -23.50 2.08E-01 6.51E +00 2.39E-01 3.86E-01 7.34E +00
10.00 -75.00 172.41 75.66 -23.50 6.05E -02 3.74E-03 2.25E-01 1.19E-01 4.08E -01
10.00 -70.00 171.87 70.71 -23.50 6.35E-02 4.24E-03 2.60E-01 1.30E-01 4.58E -01
10.00 -65.00 171.25 65.76 -23.50 7.15E -02 4.83E -03 3.04E-01 1.43E -01 5.24E -01
10.00 -60.00 170.54 60.83 -23.50 8.11E -02 5.56E-03 3.60E -01 1.58E -01 6.05E -01
u:41.vu11\ -1 9U1 o rine tilileiuki JiCe Hnalysxs - A.W. O y 1.S- Jul -89
3
TABLE 2. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE ROOF OF CELLULAR -1 4TH AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13 -JUL .-, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y-AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
10.00 -55.00 169.70 55.90 -23.50 9.26E -02 6.45E-03 4.32E -01 1.74E41 7.05E-01
10.00 -50.00 168.69 50.99 -23.50 1.06E-01 7.56E-03 5.26E-01 1.91E-01 8.31E -01
10.00 -45.00 167.47 46.10 -23.50 1.23E-01 8.96E -03 6.51E-01 2.03E -01 9.86E -01
10.00 -40.00 165.96 41.23 -23.50 1.43E -01 1.08E -02 8.20E41 2.12E -01 1.19E+00
10.00 -35.00 164.05 36.40 -23.50 1.68E-01 1.31E-02 1.07E+00 2.03E-01 1.46E+00
10.00 -30.00 161.57 31.62 -23.50 1.97E-01 1.67E-02 1.26E+00 1.70E-01 1.65E+00
10.00 -25.00 158.20 26.93 -23.50 2.31E-01 2.21E-02 1.52E+00 1.18E-01 1.89E+00
10.00 -20.00 153.43 22.36 -23.50 2.58E-01 2.95E-02 2.12E+00 6.75E-02 2.48E+00
10.00 -15.00 146.31 18.03 -23.50 2.91E-01 4.59E-02 3.97E+00 2.22E-02 4.32E+00
10.00 -10.00 135.00 14.14 -23.50 3.20E-01 1.24E-01 6.87E+00 1.39E-02 7.33E+00
10.00 -5.00 116.57 11.18 -23.50 4.80E-01 2.73E-01 2.79E+00 3.20E -02 3.58E+00
10.00 0.00 90.00 10.00 -23.50 5.63E-01 9.09E-01 1.65E+00 1.02E -01 3.22E+00
10.00 5.00 63.43 11.18 -23.50 4.80E -01 3.04E+00 1.29E+00 1.52E -01 4.96E+00
10.00 10.00 45.00 14.14 -23.50 3.20E-01 5.63E+00 1.15E+00 1.90E -01 7.29E +00
10.00 15,00 33.69 18.03 -23.50 2.91E-01 6.93E+00 9.34E-01 2.27E-01 8.38E+00
10.00 20.00 26.57 22.36 -23.50 2.58E-01 7.58E+00 7.23E-01 2.36E-01 8.79E+00
10.00 25.00 21.80 26.93 -23.50 2.31E -01 6.83E+00 5.73E-01 2.20E -01 7.85E +00
10.00 30.00 18.43 31.62 -23.50 1.97E -01 5.79E+00 4.63E -01 1.99E -01 6.65E+00
15.00 -75.00 168.69 76.49 -23.50 6.05E -02 3.79E -03 2.64E -01 9.47E -02 4.23E -01
15.00 -70.00 167.91 71.59 -23.50 6.22E -02 4.28E -03 3.14E-01 1.03E -01 4.83E -01
15.00 -65.00 167.01 66.71 -23.50 6.99E -02 4.88E -03 3.79E -01 1.09E -01 5.63E -01
15.00 -60.00 165.96 61.85 -23.50 7.90E -02 5.61E -03 4.62E-01 1.17E -01 6.63E -01
15.00 -55.00 164.74 57.01 -23.50 8.99E-02 6.50E -03 5.71E-01 1.25E -01 7.92E -01
15.00 -50.00 163.30 52.20 -23.50 1.03E -01 7.61E-03 7.31E -01 1.36E-01 9.78E-01
15.00 - 45.00 161.57 47.43 -23.50 1.18E -01 9.30E-03 9.39E-01 1.45E -01 1.21E+00
15.00 -40.00 159.44 42.72 -23.50 1.37E -01 1.16E --02 1.24E+00 1.47E-01 1.54E+00
15.00 -35.00 156.80 38.08 -23.50 1.59E-01 1.47E -02 1.77E+00 1.27E -01 2.07E+00
15.00 -30.00 153.43 33.54 -23.50 1.85E-01 1.91E-02 2.45E+00 9.04E-02 2:75E+00
15.00 -25.00 149.04 29.15 -23.50 2.14E-01 2.91E-02 3.36E+00 6.38E -02 3.67E+00
15.00 -20.00 143.13 25.00 -23.50 2.47E-01 6.31E-02 5.23E+00 3.03E-02 5.57E+00
15.00 -15.00 135.00 21.21 -23.50 2.67E-01 1.21E-01 8.24E+00 1.73E-02 8.64E+00
15.00 -10.00 123.69 18.03 -23.50 2.91E-01 1.87E -01 9.40E+00 1.38E-02 9.89E+00
15.00 -5.00 108.43 15.81 -23.50 3.08E-01 3.77E -01 7.05E+00 1.81E-02 7.75E+00
�. . -1 yu, d rlxe antenna site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul-89
4
TABLE 2. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE ROOF OF CELLULAR -1 4TH AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13-JUL-, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X-AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
15.00 0.00 90.00 15.00 -23.50 3.14E -01 8.66E -01 4.15E+00 5.13E -02 5.38E+00
15.00 5.00 71.57 15.81 -23.50 3,08E -01 2.01E+00 2.69E+00 9.00E -02 5.10E+00
15.00 10.00 56.31 18.03 -23.50 2.91E -01 3.83E+00 2.03E+00 1.19E-01 6.27E +00
15.00 15.00 45.00 21.21 -23.50 2.67E -01 5.46E+00 1.44E+00 1.50E-01 7.32E +00
15.00 20.00 36.87 25.00 -23.50 2.47E -01 6.01E+00 1.02E+00 1.52E -01 7.44E+00
15.00 25.00 30.96 29.15 -23.50 2.14E -01 5.55E+00 7.73E -01 1.48E-01 6.68E+00
15.00 30.00 26.57 33.54 -23.50 1.85E -01 4.92E+00 6.09E -01 1.43E -01 5.86E +00
30.00 -20.00 123.69 36.06 -23.50 1.70E -01 1.09E -01 7.53E+00 1.60E -02 7.82E+00
30.00 -15.00 116.57 33.54 -23.50 1.85E -01 1.67E-01 8.37E+00 1.39E -02 8.73E+00
30.00 -10.00 108.43 31.62 -23.50 1.97E -01 2.56E-01 8.59E+00 1.29E-02 9.05E+00
30.00 -5.00 99.46 30.41 -23.50 2.05E -01 3.98E-01 8.20E +00 1.35E -02 8.82E +00
30.00 0.00 90.00 30.00 -23.50 2.08E -01 6.28E -01 6.96E+00 1.51E-02 7.81E+00
30.00 5.00 80.54 30.41 -23.50 2.05E -01 9.43E-01 5.47E+00 1.85E -02 6.64E +00
30.00 10.00 71.57 31.62 -23.50 1.97E -01 1.37E+00 4.05E+00 3.17E-02 5.64E+00
30.00 15.00 63.43 33.54 -23.50 1.85E -01 1.85E+00 2.99E+00 4.70E -02 5.08E +00
30.00 20.00 56.31 36.06 -23.50 1.70E -01 2.24E+00 2.17E+00 5.34E -02 4.63E +00
30.00 25.00 50.19 39.05 -23.50 1.54E -01 2.46E+00 1.60E+00 5.51E -02 4.28E +00
30.00 30.00 45.00 42.43 -23.50 1.38E -01 2.52E+00 1.22E+00 5.55E-02 3.94E +00
40.00 -75.00 151.93 85.00 -23.50 5.53E -02 4.59E -03 5.71E -01 3.18E -02 6.63E -01
40.00 -70.00 150.26 80.62 -23.50 5.89E -02 5.56E -03 6.95E -01 3.13E -02 7.90E -01
40.00 -65.00 148.39 76.32 -23.50 6.05E -02 6.83E -03 8.52E -01 2.99E -02 9.49E -01
40.00 -60.00 146.31 72.11 -23.50 6.14E-02 8.82E -03 1.05E+00 2.91E -02 1.15E+00
40.00 -55.00 143.97 68.01 -23.50 6.77E -02 1.35E -02 1.30E+00 2.84E -02- 1.41E+00
40.00 -50.00 141.34 64.03 -23.50 7.47E-02 1.92E -02 1.65E+00 2.69E-02 1.77E+00
40.00 -45.00 138.37 60.21 -23.50 8.25E-02 2.66E-02 2.07E+00 2.32E-02 2.20E+00
40.00 -40.00 135.00 56.57 -23.50 9.10E-02 3.52E-02 2.64E+00 1.81E -02 2.79E+00
40.00 -35.00 131.19 53.15 -23.50 1.00E-01 4.55E-02 3.26E+00 1.60E-02 3.42E+00
40.00 -30.00 126.87 50.00 -23.50 1.10E-01 5.78E-02 3.94E+00 1.37E -02 4.12E+00
40.00 -25.00 122.01 47.17 -23.50 1.19E -01 7.96E -02 4.71E+00 1.17E -02 4.92E+00.
40.00 -20.00 116.57 44.72 -23.50 1.29E -01 1.10E-01 5.30E+00 1.06E-02 5.55E +00
40.00 -15.00 110.56 42.72 -23.50 1.37E -01 1.51E -01 5.64E+00 9.92E -03 5.93E+00
40.00 -10.00 104.04 41.23 -23.50 1.43E -01 2.19E -01 5.75E+00 9.41E-03 6.13E +00
40.00 -5.00 97.13 40.31 -23.50 1.48E -01 3.00E -01 5.56E+00 9.56E -03 6.01E+00
LC-L.LOLMA -1 4u1 6 r1Ke Antenna site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul -89
5
TABLE 2. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE ROOF OF CELLULAR-1 4Th AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13- 3IJL -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y-AXIS AZIM. DIST. EW..T POWER DENSITY (micro watts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 for
40.00 0.00 90.00 40.00 -23.50 1.49E -01 4.25E -01 5.09E+00 9.79E -03 5.68E+00
40.00 5.00 82.87 40.31 -23.50 1.48E -01 5.64E -01 4.41E+00 1.09E-02 5.13E+00
40.00 10.00 75.96 41.23 -23.50 1.43E -01 7.61E -01 3.67E+00 1.24E -02 4.58E +00
40.00 15.00 69.44 42.72 -23.50 1.37E -01 9.99E -01 2.99E+00 1.63E-02 4.15E+00
40.00 20.00 63.43 44.72 -23.50 1.29E -01 1.22E+00 2.32E+00 2.60E -02 3.70E+00
40.00 25.00 57.99 47.17 -23.50 1.19E -01 1.41E+00 1.87E+00 3.21E-02 3.43E+00
40.00 30.00 53.13 50.00 -23.50 1.10E -01 1.52E+00 1.45E+00 3.46E -02 3.11E+00
64.00 -75.00 139.52 98.60 -23.50 4.28E -02 1.32E -02 7.07E -01 1.22E-02 7.75E -01
64.00 -70.00 137.56 94.85 -23.50 4.58E -02 1.40E -02 8.11E -01 1.17E -02 8.83E -01
64.00 -65.00 135.44 91.22 -23.50 4.90E -02 1.49E -02 9.42E -01 1.03E-02 1.02E+00
64.00 -60.00 133.15 87.73 -23.50 5.24E -02 1.77E -02 1.10E+00 8.98E -03 1.18E+00
64.00 -55.00 130.67 84.39 -23.50 5.60E -02 2.08E -02 1.25E+00 8.02E -03 1.33E +00
64.00 -50.00 128.00 81.22 -23.50 5.85E -02 2.43E -02 1.42E+00 7.58E -03 1.51E+00
64.00 -45.00 125.11 78.24 -23.50 6.05E -02 2.89E -02 1.60E+00 7.04E-03 1.70E +00
64.00 -40.00 122.01 75.47 -23.50 6.05E -02 3.60E -02 1.79E+00 6.35E -03 1.90E+00
64.00 -35.00 118.67 72.95 -23.50 6.04E -02 4.47E -02 2.01E+00 5.76E -03 2.12E+00
64.00 -30.00 115.11 70.68 -23.50 6.35E -02 5.45E -02 2.19E+00 5.50E-03 2.31E+00
64.00 -25.00 111.34 68.71 -23.50 6.66E-02 6.70E -02 2.33E+00 5.19E-03 2.46E+00
64.00 -20.00 107.35 67.05 -23.50 6.93E -02 8.49E -02 2.43E+00 4.98E -03 2.59E+00
64.00 -15.00 103.19 65.73 -23.50 7.16E -02 1.06E -01 2.48E+00 4.87E -03 2.66E +00
64.00 -10.00 98.88 64.78 -23.50 7.33E -02 1.29E-01 2.52E+00 4.71E -03 2.72E+00
64.00 -5.00 94.47 64.20 -23.50 7.44E-02 1.62E -01 2.49E+00 4.67E-03 2.73E+00
64.00 0.00 90.00 64.00 -23.50 7.48E -02 2.00E-01 2.39E+00 4.77E -03 2.67E +00
64.00 5.00 85.53 64.20 -23.50 7.44E-02 2.39E-01 2.28E+00 4.81E -03 2.60E+00
64.00 10.00 81.12 64.78 -23.50 7.33E-02 2.92E -01 2.13E+00 4.97E -03 2.50E+00
64.00 15.00 76.81 65.73 -23.50 7.16E-02 3.47E -01 1.93E+00 5.29E-03 2.36E+00
64.00 20.00 72.65 67.05 -23.50 6.93E-02 4.04E -01 1.71E+00 5.57E-03 2.19E+00
64.00 25.00 68.66 68.71 -23.50 6.66E-02 4.75E-01 1.53E+00 6.32E-03 2.08E+00
64.00 30.00 64.89 70.68 -23.50 6.35E-02 5.35E -01 1.34E+00 7.21E -03 1.95E +00
88.00 -75.00 130.44 115.62 -23.50 3.22E-02 2.90E -02 1.14E+00 4.66E-03 1.20E+00
88.00 -70.00 128.50 112.45 -23.50 3.38E-02 3.07E-02 1.00E+00 4.49E -03 1.07E+00
88.00 -65.00 126.45 109.40 -23.50 3.56E -02 3.24E -02 9.28E-01 4.32E-03 1.00E+00
88.00 -60.00 124.29 106.51' -23.50 3.73E-02 3.38E-02 9.38E-01 4.12E-03 1.01E+00
LC..,.w -1 vui t. rixe Antenna site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13-Jul-89 6
TABLE 2. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE ROOF OF CELUJLAR -1 4Th AND PIKE .ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13 -JUL -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (rnicrowatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
88.00 -55.00 122.01 103.77 -23.50 3.91E -02 3.60E-02 9.25E. -01 3.85E -03 1.00E+00
88.00 -50.00 119.60 101.21 -23.50 4.08E -02 3.47E -02 1.00E+00 3.58E -03 1.08E+00
88.00 -45.00 117.08 98.84 -23.50 4.26E -02 3.62E-02 1.08E+00 3.33E-03 1.16E +00
88.00 -40.00 114.44 96.66 -23.50 4.43E -02 3.75E-02 1.16E+00 3.23E -03 1.24E+00
88.00 -35.00 111.69 94.70 -23.50 4.59E -02 4.11E-02 1.21E+00 3.12E -03 1.30E+00
88.00 -30.00 108.82 92.97 -23.50 4.74E -02 4.62E-02 1.26E+00 2.99E -03 1.36E +00
88.00 -25.00 105.86 91.48 -23.50 4.87E -02 5.27E-02 1.31E+00 2.90E -03 1.41E+00
88.00 -20.00 102.80 90.24 -23.50 4.99E -02 6.09E-02 1.34E+00 2.86E -03 1.45E+00
88.00 -15.00 99.67 89.27 -23.50 5.09E -02 7.08E-02 1.35E+00 2.81E-03 1.48E+00
88.00 -10.00 96.48 88.57 -23.50 5.16E -02 8.28E -02 1.37E+00 2.74E -03 1.50E+00
88.00 -5.00 93.25 88.14 -23.50 5.20E -02 9.71E-02 1.36E+00 2.69E-03 1.51E+00
88.00 0.00 90.00 88.00 -23.50 5.21E -02 1.14E -01 1.34E+00 2.73E -03 1.51E+00
88.00 5.00 86.75 88.14 -23.50 5.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.29E+00 2.76E -03 1.48E+00
88.00 10.00 83.52 88.57 -23.50 5.16E -02 1.46E-01 1.26E+00 2.78E -03 1.46E+00
88.00 15.00 80.33 89.27 -23.50 5.09E -02 1.71E-01 1.19E+00 2.78E -03 1.42E+00
88.00 20.00 77.20 90.24 -23.50 4.99E -02 1.95E -01 1.13E+00 2.92E -03 1.38E +00
88.00 25.00 74.14 91.48 -23.50 4.87E-02 2.156 -01 1.05E+00 3.04E-03 1.32E+00
88.00 30.00 71.18 92.97 -23.50 4.74E -02 2.57E-01 9.70E-01 3.15E-03 1.28E+00
AJuu. -1 ti u, a rixe to a.enna bite Analysis - A.W. GLy 13- Jul -89
7
TABLE 3. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE FLOOR OF TOP STORY OF CELLULAR --1 4TH AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13- JUL. -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X-AXIS Y-AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (micrawatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
-15.00 -75.00 191.31 76.49 -33.50 2.84E -02 2.10E -03 3.90E-02 1.48E -01 2.17E -01
-15.00 -70.00 192.09 71.59 -33.50 3.11E -02 2.37E-03 4.01E -02 1.72E-01 2.45E -01
- 15.00 -65.00 192.99 66.71 -33.50 3.40E -02 2.68E-03 4.13E-02 2.02E-01 2.80E -01
- 15.00 -60.00 194.04 61.85 -33.50 3.72E-02 3.04E-03 4.20E-02 2.40E-01 3.23E -01
-15.00 -55.00 195.26 57.01 -33.50 4.07E-02 3.47E-03 4.22E-02 2.85E-01 3.72E -01
-15.00 -50.00 196.70 52.20 -33.50 4.45E -02 3.98E-03 4.12E-02 3.41E-01 4.31E -01
-15.00 -45.00 198.43 47.43 -33.50 4.85E-02 4.58E -03 3.82E -02 4.10E -01 5.01E -01
-15.00 -40.00 200.56 42.72 -33.50 5.28E -02 5.30E -03 3.43E-02 4.80E-01 5.73E -01
-15.00 -35.00 203.20 38.08 -33.50 5.71E -02 6.34E -03 3.04E-02 5.57E -01 6.51E -01
-15.00 -30.00 206.57 33.54 -33.50 6.14E -02 7.99E -03 2.13E -02 6.93E -01 7.84E -01
-15.00 -25.00 210.96 29.15 -33.50 6.26E -02 9.42E -03 8.88E -03 8.71E -01 9.52E-01
- 15.00 -20.00 216.87 25.00 -33.50 6.56E -02 1.15E -02 5.57E -03 1.06E+00 1.15E +00
-15.00 -15.00 225.00 21.21 -33.50 6.79E -02 2.00E -02 4.57E -03 1.24E+00 1.33E+00
- 15.00 -10.00 236.31 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 3.33E -02 4.49E -03 1.25E+00 1.36E+00
-15.00 -5.00 251.57 15.81 -33.50 9.03E -02 6.79E -02 5.32E -03 1.20E+00 1.36E +00
-15.00 0.00 270.00 15.00 -33.50 1.00E -01 1.60E -01 7.44E -03 1.00E +00 1.27E+00
- 15.00 5.00 288.43 15.81 -33.50 9.03E -02 3.72E -01 /1.11E -02 8.12E-01 1.29E+00
- 15.00 10.00 303.69 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 7.43E -01 2.03E -02 6.62E -01 1.49E+00
- 15.00 15.00 315.00 21.21 -33.50 6.79E -02 1.11E+00 2.65E -02 5.52E-01 1.75E+00
-15.00 20.00 323.13 25.00 -33.50 6.56E -02 1.38E +00 3.05E -02 4.81E-01 1.96E +00
- 15.00 25.00 329.04 29.15 -33.50 6.26E -02 1.59E+00 3.54E -02 4.22E-01 2.11E+00
-15.00 30.00 333.43 33.54 -33.50 6.14E -02 1.73E+00 3.88E-02 3.45E -01 2.17E +00
0.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 -33.50 7.61E -02 6.24E -02 6.99E -01 8.44E-02 9.22E -01
0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 -33.50 7.55E -02 1.28E +00 5.72E -02 1.45E -01 1.56E +00
0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 -33.50 1.21E -01 1.64E +00 7.08E -02 1.41E -01 1.98E+00
0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 -33.50 1.00E-01 1.76E+00 8.33E -02 1.43E-01 2.09E +00
0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 -33.50 6.86E-02 1.80E+00 9.95E -02 1.43E -01 2.11E+00
0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 -33.50 6.56E-02 1.85E+00 1.00E-01 1.49E-01 2.17E+00
0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 -33.50 6.20E-02 1.96E+00 9.64E -02 1.45E-01 2.26E+00
10.00 -75.00 172.41 75.66 -33.50 2.88E -02 1.95E -03 1.12E -01 5.71E-02 2.00E -01
10.00 -70.00 171.87 70.71 -33.50 3.16E -02 2.18E-03 1.26E -01 6.03E-02 2.20E-01
10.00 -65.00 171.25 65.76 -33.50 3.46E-02 2.43E-03 1.42E-01 6.35E-02 2.42E-01
10.00 -60.00 170.54 60.83 -33.50 3.79E-02 2.72E-03 1.60E -01 6.65E-02 2.67E -01
Ju cc -1 eixe Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul-89 8
TALE 3. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABM FLOOR OF TOP STORY OF CELLULAR -1 4TH AND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13 -JUL -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y-AXIS AM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2. . ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
10.00 -55.00 169.70 55.90 -33.50 4.16E -02 3.05E -03 1.81E-01 6.89E -02 2.94E -01
10.00 -50.00 168.69 50.99 -33.50 4:55E -02 3.42E-03 2.05E -01 7.05E-02 3.24E -01
10.00 -45.00 167.47 46.10 -33.50 4.97E -02 3.85E -03 2.32E -01 6.36E -02 3.496 -01
10.00 -40.00 165.96 41.23 -33.50 5.41E -02 4.32E -03 2.37E-01 5.42E -02 3.49E -01
10.00 -35.00 164.05 36.40 -33.50 5.87E -02 4.85E -03 2.38E -01 4.81E -02 3.50E -01
10.00 -30.00 161.57 31.62 -33.50 6.23E -02 5.43E -03 2.59E -01 3.88E -02 3.65E -01
10.00 -25.00 158.20 26.93 -33.50 6.43E -02 5.65E -03 2.98E -01 2.60E -02 3.94E -01
10.00 -20.00 153.43 22.36 -33.50 6.72E -02 6.25E -03 3.62E -01 1.38E -02 4.49E -01
10.00 -15.00 146.31 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 9.31E -03 6.20E -01 4.13E -03 7.03E -01
10.00 -10.00 135.00 14.14 -33.50 1.09E -01 2.44E -02 1.03E+00 2.54E -03 1.17E+00
10.00 -5.00 116.57 11.18 -33.50 1.24E -01 5.05E -02 4.36E -01 6.11E -03 6.16E -01
10.00 0.00 90.00 10.00 -33.50 1.21E41 1.58E -01 3.06E -01 2.15E -02 6.08E -01
10.00 5.00 63.43 11.18 -33.50 1.24E-01 5.61E -01 2.56E-01 3.37E -02 9.74E -01
10.00 10.00 45.00 14.14 -33.50 1.09E -01 1.10E+00 2.39E -01 4.40E -02 1.49E+00
10.00 15.00 33.69 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 1.41E+00 2.29E -01 5.43E-02 1.76E+00
10.00 20.00 26.57 22.36 -33.50 6.72E -02 1.61E+00 2.30E -01 6.51E -02 1.97E+00
10.00 25.00 21.80 26.93 -33.50 6.43E -02 1.74E+00 2.11E -01 7.44E-02 2.09E+00
10.00 30.00 18.43 31.62 -33.50 6.23E -02 1.89E+00 1.86E-01 7.56E 42. 2.21E+00
15.00 -75.00 168.69 76.49 -33.50 2.84E -02 1.98E -03 1.32E-01 4.576 -02 2.08E -01
15.00 -70.00 167.91 71.59 -33.50 3.11E -02 2.21E -03 1.52E -01 4.79E-02 2.34E -01
15.00 -65.00 167.01 66.71 -33.50 3.40E -02 2.47E -03 1.78E -01 4.89E -02 2.63E -01
15.00 -60.00 165.96 61.85 -33.50 3.72E -02 2.76E -03 2.06E -01 4.98E -02 2.96E-01
15.00 -55.00 164.74 57.01 -33.50 4.07E -02 3.10E -03 2.41E-01 5.04E-02 3.35E -01
15.00 -50.00 163.30 52.20 -33.50 4.45E -02 3.49E -03 2.87E -01 5.15E-02 3.87E -01
15.00 -45.00 161.57 47.43 -33.50 4.85E -02 4.05E -03 3.39E -01 4.86E-02 4.40E -01
15.00 -40.00 159.44 42.72 -33.50 5.28E -02 4.75E -03 3.77E -01 4.05E -02 4.75E -01
15.00 -35.00 156.80 38.08 -33.50 5.71E 42, 5.61E -03 4.17E-01 3.04E -02 5.10E -01
15.00 -30.00 153.43 33.54 -33.50 6.14E-02 6.69E-03 5.08E-01 2.11E -02 5.97E -01
15.00 -25.00 149.04 29.15 -33.50 6.26E -02 8.38E -03 6.66E -01 1.43E-02 7.51E-01
15.00 -20.00 143.13 25.00 -33.50 6.56E -02 1.46E-02 9.87E -01 6.68E -03 1.07E+00
15.00 -15.00 135.00 21.21 -33.50 6.79E -02 2.51E -02 1.38E+00 3.69E -03 1.48E +00
15.00 -10.00 123.69 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 3.79E -02 1.52E+00 2.91E -03 1.63E+00
15.00 -5.00 108.43 15.81 -33.50 9.03E -02 7.40E -02 1.23E +00 3.90E -03 1.40E+00
l ri.iiLmit-1 4cn rlxe Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul-89 9
TABLE 3. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE FLOOR OF TOP STORY OF CELLULAR - -1 4TH HAND PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(GATE 13- JUL, -, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
15.00 0.00 90.00 15.00 -33.50 1.00E -01 1.70E-01 8.07E -01 1.14E -02 1.09E+00
15.00 5.00 71.57 15.81 -33.50 9..03E -02 3.95E -01 5.46E-01 2.06E42 1.05E+00
15.00 10.00 56.31 18.03 -33.50 6.96E -02 7.77E-01 4.32E-01 2.82E-02 1.31E+00
15.00 15.00 45.00 21.21 -33.50 6.79E -02 1.14E+00 3.74E -01 3.69E --02 1.62E+00
15.00 20.00 36.87 25.00 -33.50 6.56E-02 1.39E+00 3.38E -01 4.52E42 1.84E+00
15.00 25.00 30.96 29.15 -33.50 6.26E-02 1.60E+00 2.89E-01 5.27E -02 2.00E+00
15.00 30.00 26.57 33.54 -33.50 6.14E-02 1.72E+00 2.46E -01 5.54E-02 2.08E +00
30.00 -20.00 123.69 36.06 -33.50 5.90E-02 4.02E -02 1.71E+00 4.06E-03 1.82E+00
30.00 -15.00 116.57 33.54 -33.50 6.14E-02 5.83E -02 1.80E+00 3.39E -03 1.93E +00
30.00 -10.00 108.43 31.62 -33.50 6.23E -02 8.32E -02 1.84E+00 3.12E-03 1.99E+00
30.00 -5.00 99.46 30.41 -33.50 6.18E -02 1.22E-01 1.79E+00 3.34E-03 1.98E+00
30.00 0.00 90.00 30.00 -33.50 6.20E -02 1.89E-01 1.65E+00 3.92E-03 1.91E +00
30.00 5.00 80.54 30.41 -33.50 6.18E-02 2.90E -01 1.48E+00 5.28E -03 1.84E,+ -00
30.00 10.00 71.57 31.62 -33.50 6.23E -02 4.45E-01 1.29E+00 1.02E -02 1.81E+00
30.00 15.00 63.43 33.54 -33.50 6.14E -02 6.47E -01 1.08E+00 1.68E42 1.80E+00
30.00 20.00 56.31 36.06 -33.50 5.90E -02 8.25E --01 8.34E -01 2.04E -02 1.74E+00
30.00 25.00 50.19 39.05 -33.50 5.62E -02 9.56E -01 6.58E -01 2.22E -02 1.69E +00
30.00 30.00 45.00 42.43 -33.50 5.30E-02 1.03E+00 5.29E-01 2.35E -02' 1.64E +00
40.00 -75.00 151.93 85.00 -33.50 2.43E-02 2.43E-03 2.95E -01 1.61E -02 3.38E -01
40.00 -70.00 150.26 80.62 -33.50 2.63E-02 2.93E -03 3.53E -01 1.56E -02 3.97E -01
40.00 -65.00 148.39 76.32 -33.50 2.85E -02 3.57E-03 4.23E -01 1.45E -02 4.70E -01
40.00 -60.00 146.31 72.11 -33.50 3.08E -02 4.55E -03 5.07E-01 1.3842 5.56E -01
40.00 -55.00 143.97 68.01 -33.50 3.32E -02 6.88E -03 6.09E -01 1.31E-02 6.62E -01
40.00 -50.00 141.34 64.03 -33.50 3.57E-02 9.58E -03 7.47E -01 1.20E -02 8.04E -01
40.00 -45.00 138.37 60.21 -33.50 3.84E -02 1.30E -02 9.03E -01 9.97E-03 9.64E -01
40.00 -40.00 135.00 56.57 -33.50 4.11E -02 1.68E -02 1.10E+00 7.51E-03 1.17E+00
40.00 -35.00 131.19 53.15 -33.50 4.38E -02 2.10E-02 1.30E+00 6.41E -03 1.37E+00
40.00 -30.00 126.87 50.00 -33.50 4.63E -02 2.59E -02 1.51E+00 5.32E-03 1.58E+00
40.00 -25.00 122.01 47.17 -33.50 4.88E-02 3.46E -02 1.73E+00 4.41E -03 1.82E+00
40.00 -20.00 116.57 44.72 -33.50 5.09E -02 4.64E -02 1.89E+00 3.90E -03 1.99E+00
40.00 -15.00 110.56 42.72 -33.50 5.28E -02 6.20E -02 1.96E+00 3.58E -03 2.07E+00
40.00 -10.00 104.04 41.23 -33.50 5.41E -02 8.79E -02 1.98E+00 3.38E-03 2.13E+00
40.00 -5.00 97.13 40.31 -33.50 5.50E -02 1.19E -01 1.94E +00 3.48E -03 2.12E+00
-ILA a r ni ?Analysis - A.W. (Uy 13- Jul-89
10
TABLE 3. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE FLOOR OF .WP STORY OF CELLULAR -1 4TH AND PIKE ANUENNA SITE
(DATE 13- JUL-, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 AMT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
40.00 0.00 90.00 40.00 -33.50 5.53E -02 1.68E -01 1.83E+00 3.64E -03 2.06E+00
40.00 5.00 82.87 40.31 -33.50 5.50E-02 2.23E -01 1.64E+00 4.14E -03 1.93E+00
40.00 10.00 75.96 41.23 -33.50 5.41E -02 3.06E -01 1.43E+00 4.88E -03 1.79E+00
40.00 15.00 69.44 42.72 -33.50 5.28E -02 4.10E. -01 1.22E+00 6.63E -03 1.69E+00
40.00 20.00 63.43 44.72 -33.50 5.09E -02 5.15E41 9.87E -01 1.09E -02 1.56E+00
40.00 25.00 57.99 47.17 -33.50 4.88E1 -02 6.14Er 41 8.27E -01 1.40E-02 1.50E+00
40.00 30.00 53.13 50.00 -33.50 4.63E-02 6.80E -01 6.65E -01 1.56E -02 1.41E+00
64.00 -75.00 139.52 98.60 -33.50 1.94E-02 5.44E -03 3.75E -01 6.47E -03 4.06E -01
64.00 -70.00 137.56 94.85 -33.50 2.04E-02 6.69E-03 4.29E -01 6.13E -03 4.62E -01
64.00 -65.00 135.44 91.22 -33.50 2.18E -02 7.94E-03 4.95E -01 5.39E -03 5.30E -01
64.00 -60.00 133.15 87.73 -33.50 2.31E -02 9.41E -03 5.71E-01 4.64E -03 6.08E -01
64.00 -55.00 130.67 84.39 - 33.50 2.46E -02 1.10E -02 6.44E-01 4.10E -03 6.84E -01
64.00 -50.00 128.00 81.22 -33.50 2.60E -02 1.28E -02 7.24E -01 3.83E -03 7.67E-01
64.00 -45.00 125.11 78.24 -33.50 2.75E -02 1.52E --02 8.08E-01 3.51E-03 8.54E-01
64.00 -40.00 122.01 75.47 -33.50 2.89E-02 1.88E -02 8.95E -01 3.13E -03 9.46E -01
64.00 -35.00 118.67 72.95 -33.50 3.03E-02 2.31E -02 9.91E-01 2.81E -03 1.05E+00
64.00 -30.00 115.11 70.68 -33.50 3.16E-02 2.80E-02 1.07E+00 2.66E-03 1.13E+00
64.00 -25.00 111.34 68.71 -33.50 3.28E-02 3.41E -02 1.12E+00 2.49E-03 1.19E+00
64.00 -20.00 107.35 67.05 -33.50 3.38E-02 4.30E-02 1.17E+00 2.37E -03 1.25E+00
64.00 -15.00 103.19 65.73 -33.50 3.46E -02 5.31E -02 1.18E +00 2.31E -03 1.27E+00
64.00 -10.00 98.88 64.78 -33.50 3.53E-02 6.47E-02 1.20E +00 2.23E-03 1.30E+00
64.00 -5.00 94.47 64.20 -33.50 3.56E -02 8.08E-02 1.19E+00 2.22E -03 1.31E +00
64.00 0.00 90.00 64.00 -33.50 3.58E-02 9.96E-02 1.15E+00 2.27E-03 1.29E +00
64.00 5.00 85.53 64.20 -33.50 3.56E -02 1.19E -01 1.11E+00 2.31E-03 1.26E+00
64.00 10.00 81.12 64.78 -33.50 3.53E -02 1.46E-01 1.04E +00 2.41E-03 1.22E+00
64.00 15.00 76.81 65.73 -33.50 3.46E-02 1.75E-01 9.56E-01 2.59E -03 1.17E +00
64.00 20.00 72.65 67.05 -33.50 3.38E -02 2.05E -01 8.59E -01 2.76E -03 1.10E+00
64.00 25.00 68.66 68.71 -33.50 3.28E -02 2.42E -01 7.75E-01 3.17E-03 1.05E+00
64.00 30.00 64.89 70.68 -33.50 3.16E -02 2.75E -01 6.88E -01 3.66E-03 9.98E -01
88.00 -75.00 130.44 115.62 -33.50 1.71E -02 6.13E -03 3.42E -01 2.51E -03 3.68E -01
88.00 -70.00 128.50 112.45 -33.50 1.81E -02 6.92E -03 3.76E -01 2.42E-03 4.03E -01
88.00 -65.00 126.45 109.40 -33.50 1.86E -02 7.79E -03 4.12E -01 2.32E --03 4.41E -01
88.00 -60.00 124.29 106.51 -33.50 1.91E -02 9.08E -03 4.51E -01 2.21E -03 4.81E -01
...�• - uu� -i 8811 a C./AC rulLCluto J1LC HlkllyS1S - H.W. l,Uy 1.3�JUI--d
11
TABLE 3. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY 5 FT ABOVE FLOOR Cr TOP STORY OF CELWLAR --1 4TH AND PIiE ANIE2sZIA SITE
(LATE 13 -JUL Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna)
X -AXIS • Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANTI_ Mr 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
88.00 -55.00 122.01 103.77 -33.50 1.94E42 1.07E-02 4.90E-01 2.06E-03 5.22E -01
88.00 -50.00 119.60 101.21 -33.50 1.94E -02 1.26E-02 5.33E -01 1.91E-03 5.67E-01
88.00 -45.00 117.08 98.84 -33.50 1.94E-02 1.47E -02 5.75E -01 1.77E -03 6.11E-01
88.00 -40.00 114.44 96.66 -33.50 1.98E -02 1.70E-02 6.15E -01 1.72E -03 6..54E -01
88.00 -35.00 111.69 94.70 -33.50 2.05E -02 1.985 -02 6.435-01 1.65E -03 6.85E41
88.00 -30.00 108.82 92.97 - 33.50 2.115 -02 2.335 -02 6.69E-01 1.58E -03 7.155 -01
88.00 -25.00 105.86 91.48 -33.50 2.17E-02 . 2.81E -02 6.90E -01 1.53E-03 7.42E-01
88.00 -20.00 102.80 90.24 -33.50 2.21E42 3.24E-02 7.05E-01 1.51E -03 7.61E-01
88.00 -15.00 99.67 89.27 -33.50 2.25E-02 3..76E-02 7.14E -01 1.48E -03 7.76E -01
88.00 -10.00 96.48 88.57 - 33.50 2.28E -02 4.40E-02 7.21E -01 1.44E -03 7.89E -01
88.00 -5.00 93.25 88.14 -33.50 2.30E-02 5.16E -02 7.17E -01 1.42E-03 7.93E -01
88.00 0.00 90.00 88.00 -33.50 2.30E-02 6.04E-02 7.10E-01 1.44E-03 7.94E-01
88.00 5.00 86.75 88.14 -33.50 2.30E-02 6.94E -02 6.845 -01 1.46E -03 7.78E -01
88.00 10.00 83.52 88.57 -33.50 2.28E-02 7.74E-02 6.65E -01 1.47E -03 7.67E -01
88.00 15.00 80.33 89.27;: - 33.50 2.25E-02 9.09E -02 6.34E-01 1.47E-03 7- .-49E -01
88.00 20.00 77.20 90.24 -33.50 2.21E-02 1.04E-01 5.99E-01 1.55E -03 7.26E --01
88.00 25.00 74.14 91.48 -33.50 2.17Er -02 1.14E -01 5.60E -01 1.62E-03 6.98E -01
88.00 30.00 71.18 92.97 -33.50 2.11E-02 1.30E -01 5.16E -01 1.68E -03 • 6.69E -01
CELLULAR -1 4th & Pike Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. Guy 13- Jul-89 12
TABLE 4. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY AS A FUNICTION OF DISTANCE FROM ANTED #3 AT 4TH & PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13-JUL,-89, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of penthouse roof)
X-AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV. POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) ANT 1 ANT 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
-15.00 0.00 270.00 15.00 6.00 5.66E+01 3.67E+00 7.81E-02 1.35E+02 1.95E+02
- 20.00 0.00 270.00 20.00 6.00 3.27E+01 2.20E+00 9.65E -02 9.92E+01 1.34E+02
- 25.00 0.00 270.00 25.00 6.00 2.12E+01 1.84E+00 9.03E -02 7.44E+01 9.75E+01
-30.00 0.00 270.00 30.00 6.00 1.48E+01 2.61E+00 7.56E -02 5.66E+01 7.41E +01
- 35.00 0.00 270.00 35.00 6.00 1.09E+01 2.54E+00 6.61E -02 4.37E+01 5.72E+01
- 40.00 0.00 270.00 40.00 6.00 8.40E+00 2.25E+00 5.75E -02 3.48E+01 4.55E+01
-45.00 0.00 270.00 45.00 6.00 6.66E+00 2.04E+00 4.82E-02 2.81E+01 3.68E+01
- 50.00 0.00 270.00 50.00 6.00 5.41E +00 1.79E+00 4.09E -02 2.32E +01 3.05E +01
- 55.00 0.00 270.00 55.00 6.00 4.48E +00 1.53E +00 3.57E -02 1.95E +01 2.56E +01
-60.00 0.00 270.00 60.00 6.00 3.77E+00 1.34E+00 3.14E -02 1.65E+01 2.17E +01
- 65.00 0.00 270.00 65.00 6.00 3.22E+00 1.18E +00 2.79E -02 1.42E+01 1.87E +01
-70.00 0.00 270.00 70.00 6.00 2.78E+00 1.05E+00 2.49E -02 1.24E+01 1.62E+01
-75.00 0.00 270.00 75.00 6.00 2.42E+00 9.38E -01 2.23E -02 1.09E+01 1.42E+01
-80.00 0.00 270.00 80.00 6.00 2.13E+00 8.39E -01 2.00E -02 9.59E+00 1.26E+01
-85.00 0.00 270.00 85.00 6.00 1.89E+00 7.53E -01 1.80E-02 8.54E+00 1.12E +01
- 90.00 0.00 270.00 90.00 6.00 1.68E +00 6.79E -01 1.63E -02 7.64E+00 1.00E +01
-95.00 0.00 270.00 95.00 6.00 1.51E+00 6.13E -01 1.48E -02 6.87E+00 9.01E+00
- 100.00 0.00 270.00 100.00 6.00 1.36E+00 5.57E -01 1.35E -02 6.22E+00 8.15E+00
- 105.00 0.00 270.00 105.00 6.00 1.24E +00 5.08E -01 1.24E-02 5.65E+00 7.41E+00
- 110.00 0.00 270.00 110.00 6.00 1.13E+00 4.66E -01 1.14E -02 5.16E+00 6.77E+00
- 115.00 0.00 270.00 115.00 6.00 1.03E+00 4.28E-01 1.05E-02 4.73E+00 6.20E+00
- 120.00 0.00 270.00 120.00 6.00 9.49E -01 3.95E -01 9.69E-03 4.35E+00 5.70E+00
- 125.00 0.00 270.00 125.00 6.00 8.75E -01 3.66E-01 8.98E -03 4.01E+00 5.26E+00
- 130.00 0.00 270.00 130.00 6.00 8.09E -01 3.39E -01 8.34E -03 3.71E+00 4.87E+00
- 135.00 0.00 270.00 135.00 6.00 7.50E-01 3.14E -01 7.77E-03 3.45E+00 4.52E+00
- 140.00 0.00 270.00 140.00 6.00 6.98E -01 .2.93E -01 7.25E -03 3.21E+00 4.21E+00
- 145.00 0.00 270.00 145.00 6.00 6.51E-01 2.73E -01 6.78E -03 3.00E+00 3.93E +00
- 150.00 0.00 270.00 150.00 6.00 6.08E -01 2.55E -01 6.35E-03 2.80E+00 3.67E+00
- 155.00 0.00 270.00 155.00 6.00 5.69E -01 2.39E -01 5.97E -03 2.63E+00 3.44E+00
- 160.00 0.00 270.00 160.00 6.00 5.34E -01 2.25E -01 5.61E -03 2.47E+00 3.23E+00
- 165.00 0.00 270.00 165.00 6.00 5.03E -01 2.12E -01 5.29E -03 2.32E+00 3.04E +00
- 170.00 0.00 270.00 170.00 6.00 4.74E-01 1.99E -01 5.00E -03 2.19E +00 2.87E+00
- 175.00 0.00 270.00 175.00 6.00 4.47E -01 1.88E -01 4.73E -03 2.07E +00 2.71E +00
LL,., JLeut -1 a rixe Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. GUy 13- Jul-89
13
TABLE 4. CALCULATED POWER DENSITY AS A FUNCTION OF DISTANCE FROM ANTENNA #3 AT 4TH & PIKE ANTENNA SITE
(DATE 13- JUL -89, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of penthouse roof)
X -AXIS Y -AXIS AZIM. DIST. ELEV POWER DENSITY (microwatts per square centimeter)
(ft) (ft) (deg) (ft) (ft) Atli' 1 AN'r 2 ANT 3 ANT 4 TOT
- 180.00 0.00 270.00 180.00 6.00 4.22E -01 1.78E -01 4.48E -03 1.96E+00 2.56E +00
- 185.00 0.00 270.00 185.00 6.00 4..00E -01 1.69E -01 4.25E -03 1.86E+00 2.43E +00
- 190.00 0.00 270.00 190.00 6.00 3.79E -01 1.60E -01 4.04E -03 1.76E +00 2.30E +00
- 195.00 0.00 270.00 195.00 6.00 3.60E -01 1.52E -01 3.84E -03 1.67E+00 2.19E +00
- 200.00 0.00 270.00 200.00 6.00 3.42E -01 1.45E -01 3.66E -03 1.59E+00 2.08E +00
- 205.00 0.00 270.00 205.00 6.00 3.26E-01 1.38E -01 3.49E-03 1.52E +00 1.98E +00
- 210.00 0.00 270.00 210.00 6.00 3.10E -01 1.31E -01 3.33E -03 1.45E +00 1.89E+00
- 215.00 0.00 270.00 215.00 6.00 2.96E -01 1.25E -01 3.18E -03 1.38E+00 1.80E +00