Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-07-87 - SEATTLE RENDERING WORKS - METAL FRAME, ASPHALT REPAIR AND PAVINGSEATTLE RENDERING WORKS METAL FRAME ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING 5795 S. 130T" PLACE EPIC -7 -87 FINAL COST ESTIMATE WORKSHEET PROJECT &-rn.,E I g ci Wol Y-S LOCATION -'UKw r��A PHASF 1 ESTIMATE NO. PREPARED BY 12-64-1 CHECKED BY SHEET __L_ OF I DATE I- 7 DATE ITEM • QUANTITY INSTALLATION NO. 1. DESCRIPTION NO. UNIT S PER UNIT MATERIALS TOTAL S PER UNIT Ac.Eg sa►c c,Ag, r.� c.� rie7 IS 2, R S JuL./AMA 20 '3. 4.. JL1N1YEjeu C. 1QP1TZW121444 Atesd /1Yc Ep w/L.ar `F � JJE •nx rn/��ur.1Eg 1411LoPzi g,e SEEc7 Q )6 S P pe ' 2" 46�A Ei rE ck-EP(ur r .11 terresi 4) /,PDUAJ04P o,e £QuaL , 12/44 NY �• 17 104°° 3 °d 2 /s' 4cooa5 145° TOTAL 4r° e055° Z04° 2�joO° Io4° O'& P TOTAL COST 14-43°° 7So 4 -74v °o .10/44.x1 cr0 ( -1 \_ ‘.N.k"'� :z • i..�� ..h \l',11- City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. Vanousen, Mayor LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL -60 Ce, hh Pv -/l 996z4 (Lii41, : n 6a_ad WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING Eb'ttached ❑ Under separate cover COPIES DESCRIPTION DATE 41:///7/1 REGARDING eP /C.' %' 87 6.707. (NICL THESE ARE TRANSMITTED For approval For review and comment [ErFor your use and information E] As requested 0 Other COMMENTS SIGNED /? wv ) k -Git> (LOT /50) AFF•AVIT OF DISTRISTION I, hiA,,,,pio hereby declare that: J Notice of Public Hearing J Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet J Board of Appeals Agenda Packet J Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet LirDetermination of Nonsignificance 'Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action [[ Official Notice (� Notice of Application for [J Other Shoreline Management Permit [j Shoreline Management Permit [( Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on 4 a(ctaked )&4;e Name of Project �e-44 ILT-011-e it/ Signature File Number Ile- 7- ,67 l5 , 19fy. )6t.t_te WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal 1. 12' x 42' metal frame addition to the existing building. 2. Repair and replace broken /poorly draining asphalt areas in the northeast 1 -3/4 acres of the site. 3. Install new storm system. 4. Pave existing parking areas for 25 cars. Proponent SEATTLF RFNDFRTNG WDRKS Location of Proposal, including street address, if any 5795 S. 130th Place, Tukwila, WA 98178 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -7 -87 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS �[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by N1UA . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukw Date �,�� CJ/ Signature Phone 433 -1845 You ma appeal this determination to the City Cler at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAILINGS ( ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ) Federal Highway Administration FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( )U.S. Department of H.U.D.. (Region X) WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department ( ) Department of Fisheries ( ) Office of the Governor ( ) Planning & Community Affairs Agency Dept. of Planning & Community Dev ) Fire District 18 Boundary Review Board ) Health Department ( ) South Central School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Washington Natural Gas ( ) Water District 75 ( ) Seattle Water Department ( ) Group W Cable ( ) Kent Planning Department ( ) Tukwila Board of Adjustment ( ) Tukwila Mayor Tukwila City Departments: ( ) - Public Works ( ) - Parks and Recreation ( ) - Police ( ) - Fire ( ) - Finance ( ) - Planning /Building ()Dept. of Social and Health Services ()Dept. of Ecology, Shorelands Division (7C)Dept. of Ecology, SEPA Division * ( )Department of Game ( )Office of Attorney General * Send checklist with all determinations KING COUNTY AGENCIES el. ( )Fire District 1 ( )Fire District 24 (> )Building & Land Development Division - SEPA Information Center SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES ( )Highline School District ( )King County Public Library ( )Seattle Municipal Reference Library UTILITIES ( )Puget Sound Power & Light ( )Val -Vue Sewer District ( )Water District 20 ( )Water District 25 ( )Water District 125 ( )Union Pacific Railroad CITY AGENCIES ( )Renton Planning Department ( )Tukwila Planning Commission Tukwila City Council Members: ( )- Edgar Bauch ( )- Marilyn Stoknes ( )- Joe Duffie ( )- Mabel Harris ( )- Charlie Simpson ( )- Jim McKenna ( )- Wendy Morgan OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES Puget Sound Council of Government(PSCOG) ( )METRO Environmental Planning Division ) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Office. /Industrial 10,000 gsf or more ) Tukwila /Sea -Tac Chamber of Commerce Residential 50 units or more Retail 100,000 gsf or more MEDIA ( ) Daily Journal of Commerce M) Renton Record Chronicle ejA ( )Highline Times ( )Seattle Times • CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM 1) GENERAL LOCATION OF,FROPOSED PROJECT: Site of Seattle Rendering Works 5795 South 130th Place, Seattle, WA 98178 WITHIN N.W. & N.E. (1/4„ SEC.) OF.SECTION 14 OF,TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E W.M., IN TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 2) NAME OF WATER AREA AND /OR WETLANDS WITHIN WHICH DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED: Duwamish River Borders site on three sides. 3) CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY WITH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: Waste Meat and Fish by- products are rendered into feed meal. 4) PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: No Change 5) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST AND FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT INCLUDING ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS CONTEMPLATED BUT NOT INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION: $7,4,650 (estimated) 6) CONSTRUCTION DATES (MONTH AND YEAR) FOR WHICH THIS PERMIT IS REQUESTED: BEGIN April 1987 COMPLETE May 1987 7 ) TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL: DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE: 8) APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL DWELLING UNITS THAT WILL HAVE A VIEW OBSTRUCTED BY ANY PROPOSED STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 35 FEET IN HEIGHT. • AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: APRIL 13, 1987 TO: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: SEATTLE RENDERING WORKS, INC. BILL HAMMOND SUBJECT: MODIFIED PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVEMENTS Prior to, or in conjunction with, City Permits for the parking lot improvements and lean -to, Seattle Rendering Works will submit a landscape plan prepared by a certified landscape architect which address the following items: 1. Additional trees along the river to provide screening from parking lot. 2. Additional trees to reduce the wind flow. 3. Additional plants that bloom producing a scent in the summer months. CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: 41010 CN EPIC /3-7 FILE L!Gt hie 7 a TO: Q BLDG PLNG n P.W. ® FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT ti 7h Geis ' ��� �r�re�I�■� -' a�- 1.1.x�-� ec�.�*ji .4 14. C, 4 A --th IYtoi, LOCATION ,S %G!5 S %,30-0' 62/ _ ,__ -- un�4 i - i DATE TRANSMITTED 4/e1"8-) RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4/)'7e7 STAFF COORDINATOR` )x,,k. 4;64 RESPONSE RECEIVED -- THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE Jia I k2 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA • • CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: • •CN EPIC 61L % /S-7 FILE ii),8 7 TO: n BLDG Q PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE ® `P & R PROJECT s.f.riziiia 6),,,,EIRA,,-,2.5 &bpi', off, ).7-x -2' *A. 4 %A eAd Ali, ftMJ fiu.-* 2,71/es m LOCATION S76:ic J.-3011- al(-e-, - - FI:LE NO,.,.,„(,(4_, > T DATE TRANSMITTED 4 J'j) ' ) ESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4/) ec/t STAFF COORDINATOR` RESPONSE RECEIVED " THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 4V o Q"� COMMENTS PREPARED BY -,4.egeg C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA N CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM 00CN EPIC /C.._ /JS -7 FILE L4c4,i Ji'A3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: Llyw�ils�7�IG� U r. TO: El BLDG [l PLNG n P.W. [ FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT O& /A,15 Cc,).zs - 1, -xx.*Z' zid,i74 tr`L 4 A9, c4 LOCATION _577012; ) 3J t ibc-e. DATE TRANSMITTED 4 ./4 1'- '-7 �w,* 16 N4/ /d FILE NO. UG1,1 /1/� "ES'PONSE-"REQUESTED BY 4/hr 7 /% . _ STAFF COORDINATOk „„, RESPONSE RECEIVED" THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT /16 DATE Y 9(/?T COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 • A. BACKGROUND Con 1 No. Epiile No. P /L /$ %�1 J Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONM ,TAL CHECKLIST 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: eattle Rendering Works 2. Name:of applicant: Seattle Rendering Works, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5795 So. 130th Place Seattle, WA 98178 (Bill Hammond 937 -4074) 4. Date checklist prepared: 4 -2 -87 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): May - April, 1987 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Does Not Apply 9. Do you kno,; whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, A Shoreline permit has been applied for so that improvements to existing storm system can be made. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 12'x42' metal frame addition to existing building. Will enclose existing con- crete loading platform so that fumes generated in container washing.pr cess LAO__ be collected and drawn through a scrubbing system prior to release to outside air. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Seattle Rendering Works Sec. 14 5795 South 130th Place Seattle, WA 98178 Twp. 23 Rng. 4 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, site Shoreline designated for special development considerations. (site is_ ITLiaed on three sides by Duwamish River.) Tfl'BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC NT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1: Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Bounded by Duwamish River of 3 sides -steep bank. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 6%, note: at river bank 40% to vertical c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Puyallup very fine sandy loam. (U.S.D.A. Survey) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, natural erosion at'river. banks. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Does not apply. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No Change, addition will enclose existing concrete loading dock. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Does Not Apply. • 2. Air a. What types of emissions t� the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No Change. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, pRgds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. _ Site is bounded by Duwamish River on three sides. • S Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If -yes, please describe and attach available plans.No• 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Evaluation for 411 • Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known.No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No Change c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff is due to rainfall and is (1) collected in catch basins and conveyed by piep to outfall at the river (2) collected in and conveyed by ditch and culverts to outfelT at the river (3) drains naturally overland to river bank and then the Duwamish River eventually flows into Puget Sound. See Hydrology Report submitted with Storm Drainage _ permit application. • Aft Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No Change 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found site: x deciduous x evergreen x shrubs x grass pasture _ crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, x other types of vegetation tree: alder, maple, aspen, other tree: fir, cedar, pine, other on the buttercup, bullrush, eelgrass, milfoil, other b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No Change c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Known • • m, Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: one 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Seagulls mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Not Known fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do not kwow d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if an„z. None • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of etfergy (electric, natural gas, oil, • wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the • completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:N /A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might bg_required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • b. Noise 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?j/A 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noises associated with framing. Approximately hours of operation 7:30 -4:30 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Wastemeat and fish by _produce are rendered into feed meal. Adjacent prourty (east) is Northern Pacific Railroad tracks with vacant property beyond. Bounded on north, west, and south by Duwamish River. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not Known c. Describe any structures on the site. Single Story office and lab .buildings. Three processing buildings with attached meal storage silos. Five small out- buildings, two sheds and a house. • • Evaluation for • Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MN - Light Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, Shoreline Classified: "Special Development Considerations" i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 30 -40 Workers j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A • t Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately hoW many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No Change to existing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No Change c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal • produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any None • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation < a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- * posed for,' national, state, or local preservation .registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is presently accessed by South 130th Street. No Change to access will be made. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest tr``dnsit step? No, approximately 1/2 mile to Interurban Avenue. c. How malay, parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking el iminatedjaclJeJ Evaluation for • • Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No Change g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A • 16. Utilities • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilities' currently available at the site: • electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No Change C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Tag COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. . How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Would not increase existing discharges or emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No Change Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A • Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would_ the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inciduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No Change Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 40 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No- Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Improve air quality by removing odors generated in container washing process. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Does Not apply. Work is being done request of Puget Sound Air Pollution Control. inspector Harry Waters. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Does not apply • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4e Does the proposal coiflict with policies of the Tukwila . Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -23- Al City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT File No. 87 -3 -SMP Notice is hereby given that Seattle Rendering Works who is the owner of the below- described property has filed an application for asubstantial development permit for the development of a new storm system, add oil water separator, and pave parking for 25 cars. Repair and replace broken /poorly draining asphalt areas will also be done. located at 5795 South 130th place, Seattle, Washington, within NW AND NE quarter section of Section 14 of Township 23 N., Range 4 E W.M., in Tukwila, Washington. Said development is proposed to be within Duwamish River and /or its associated wetlands. Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action taken on this application should notify Jack Pace, Senior Planner, Planning Department, City of Tukwila, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188, in writing of his interest within thirty days of the final date of publication of this notice which is March 6, 1987. Written comments must be received by April 6, 1987. Published in: Record Chronicle - February 27 and March 6, 1987 Distribution: City Clerk, Mayor, Adjacent Property Owners, Department of Ecology, Property Owner, File Department of Fisheries (23/SHORE2 -26) CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM Control # File #(s)87-3-90 Fee(s) $ Receipt # g 7 PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING. SECTION 1: GENERAL DATA TYPE OF APPLICATION: O BsiP APPLICANT: Si�1L',��►►I1T?�T L P • Bun L SUEDIVI^u°ION SHORELINE pRD PMUD: Q BAR PERMIT INTERURBAN OONDITIONAL USE/ COOPERATIVE PARKING DUNCLASS. USE DVARIANCE DCHG. OF D COMP. PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT TELEPHONE ( 2062439-87137887 WA zip 98178 TELEM1 -QNE ( 206) 937 -4074 zip 98146 NAME - Seattle Rendering Works, Inc. ADDRESS 5795 South 130th Place, Seattle, PROP. OWNER: NAME Ron Johnson ADDRESS 4222 S.W. 107th, Seattle, WA PROJECT LOCATION: (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT /BLOCK) Site of Seattle Rendering Works, Inc. 5795 South 130th Place, Seattle, WA 98178 SECTION 11 :, PROJECT INFORMATION 4) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY THE PROJECT YOU PROPOSE Upgrade Storm Drainage system in N.E. position of site. Repair or Replace poorly drainaing pavement. Pave existing gravel 5) ANTICIPATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM April '87 To May '87 parking lot. 6) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED IN PHASES? []YES ONO IF YES, DESCRIBE: Future improvement of storm drainage system in South and West portions-of site. PROJECT STATISTICS: '1' 11 :9.Acres GROSS 11.9 Acres EASEMENTS TOTAL # FLOORS TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: (None) SITE UTILIZATION: ZONING DESIGNATION COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PAVING AREA TOTAL PARKING STALLS: - STANDARD S I. ZE. - COMPACT SIZE - HANDICAPPED SIZE TOTAL LOADING SPACES AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 8) 1S THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL MAP? © YES D NO SECT 1 ON III S it APP:- i CANT' S F I DAV I T EXISTING MH Lt. Indust. 34850 ❑ 3500 ❑ 138600 ❑ 2% INCLUDES: O BASEMENT ❑ MEZZANINE INCLUDES: O BASEMENT ['MEZZANINE PROPOSED NOTES MH No-Change Lt. Indust. No Change 34850 ❑ No Change 3500 ❑ No Change 150100 ❑ Add 11,500 SF. A.C. Paving 24 1.5%u 2% Site Very Flat CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT 1 AM THE CONTRACT`PURCHAS OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY 1NVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION AND THAT THE FORE- GOING STATEMENTE.Ahm ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE,I T 0 MY KNOWL ALL RESPECTS :TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE B DATE ION HEREWITH SUBMITTED ARE IN BELIEF SUESCR1RED ANI SWORN B .ORE ME TON RESIDING AT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Conliol No. Epic File No.CA -1 8 'J Fee 5100.00 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Seattle Rendering Works 2. Name of applicant: Seattle Rendering Works, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5795 So. 130th Place Seattle, WA 98178 (Bill Hammond 937-4074) 4. Date checklist prepared: 01 -26 -87 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): May - April. 1987 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future improvement of storm drainage system, south & west portion of site. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. D.O.E. letter enclosed.- Hydrology report to be submitted with permit application. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No • • 10. list any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. D.O.E. approval of storm drainage improvements, including oil water separation. Shoreline Management permit. Storm Drainage (utility permit). Grading Permit. Flood Control Zone Permit, 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Repair and replace broken /poorly draining asphalt areas, in northeast 1 3/4 acres of site. Install new storm system. Add oil -water separator, add paved parking for 25 cars. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Seattle Rendering Works Sec. 14 5795 South 130th Place Twp. 23_ Seattle, WA 98178 Rnq. 4 See plans and exhibits submitted with Shoreline permit application. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, site Shoreline designated for special development considerations. (site is bounded on three sides by Duwamish River TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC.'-- Evaluation for • Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL. ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Bounded by Duwamish River on 3 sides - steep bank. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 6 %, note: at river bank 40% to vertical c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Puyallup very fine sandy loam. (U.S.D.A. Survey). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No natural erosion at river banks. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grade approx.: 24,500 SF to repair existing and add new A.C. pavement areas. Excavate detention pond: cut approx.: 6000 CF Total cut: 750 CY Total Fill: 510 CY - Local crushed rock f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so generally describe. Yes, where pavement is replaced, heavy runoff could erode subgrade. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Prior to renovation: 33.5 %± After renovation: 35.8 %} Difference due to paving. existing gravel parking lot. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Failed pavement to be replaced in dry weather. use sand bags as perimeter dams. silt fences placed at Pavement edge. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No Change. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Site is bounded by Duwamish River on three sides. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.Yes, repair and replace broken or poorly draining asphalt areas add oil -water separator, add paved parking for 25 cars. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, see site plan. The new pavement over the existing gravel lot lies within the 100 -year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No change. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Run -off is due to rainfall and is (1) collected in catch basins and conveyed by pipe to outfall at the river (2) collected in and conveyed by ditch and culverts to outfall at the river (3) drains naturally overland to river bank and then the Duwamish River eventually flows into Puget Sound. See Hydrology Report submitted with Storm Drainage permit application. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Most of this project is proposed to reduce impacts of runolro- 0 1, grease, & animT products into the Duwamish ever. 1) Isolate washing activities to areas where runoff will flow to drain fields. 2) Installation of large detention pond, catch basins with sand tras and a .Oil -Water separator tank to provide for sedi- ment /oil removal and storage. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder maple, aspen, x evergreen tree: (► cedar, X shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,(Othe? water plants: water lily, milfoil, X other types of vegetation Blackberries b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No Change c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Known • S Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Seagulls mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Not Known fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not Known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Do Not Know d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for M' Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. IVA b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/A 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/A 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction equipment operation -back hoe, blade, paver, dump trucks otherwise no change. Approx. Hours of operation 7:30-4:30. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Wastemeat and fish by produce are rendered into feed meal. Adjacent property (east) is Northern Pacific Railroad Tracks with vacant property beyond. Bounded on North, west, and south by Duwamish River. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not Known c. Describe any structures on the site. Single story office and lab buildings. Three processing buildings with attached meal storage silos. Five small out - buildings, two sheds and a house. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MH - Light Industrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, Shoreline Classified: "Special Development Considerations" i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 30 - 40 Workers j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/A . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No Change to existing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No Change c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any - existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:None Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation . a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is presently accessed by South 130th Street. No Change to access will be made. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No approximately 1/2 mile to Interurban Avenue. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 25 parking spaces will be provided by paving over the existing gravel lot. No parking eliminated. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Existing paved areas to be repaired /replaced to Promote better drainage, (private) Storm sewer system will be upgraded, e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate. vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No Change g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No Change C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL•NT • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Would not increase existing discharges or emissions. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No Change Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No Change • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N/A Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI•' • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Upgrade storm drainage system in northeast portion of site. Repair, or replace as needed, broken or poorly drainage pavement. Add 25 spaces of paved parking. Add oil-water separation and a detention pond to help prevent oil & associated waste from entering river. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Create new grades necessary to achieve good drainage by overlaying entire existing pavement area with asphaltic concrete. Raise catch basin rims to match new grades. Clean existing clogged pipes. Create additional outfall(s) to the river to help drain low areas & install an oil -water separator upstream of each discharge location. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Overlaying existing surface will eventually result in a failed pavement in areas where the existing poor subgrade is not improved. Existing catch basins are shallow and therefore provide minimal sediment removal. Existing pipes are undersized for design flows. Creating additional outfalls is environmentally undesireable. On the other hand, the proposed project repairs or replaces damaged subgrades prior to paving; provides new catchbasins with adequate sand traps, and new drainage pipes with adequate flow capacities. One existing outfall is eliminated, and a new detention pond with orifice control is provided to limit discharge. With only one outlet. only one oil -water separator is required, and existing well- draining pavement areas are incorporated in the design so that the quantity of new pavement required is minimized. Therefore, the proposed project is preferred over the alternative discussed above. -22- • • 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only PHASE 11 <FUTURE STORIdSYSTIII 0.110•INENTSt INMATES 131•111 OV OIADING, TOTAL mow a•nme SI TOT/4. CUTars• CT TOT•• FEL: IDS CT LOP •■•.,• 0 0 SHEET INDEX C1 GRADING • MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN CI STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 'PHASE I I CS DETA/LIA NOTES C• CROSS-SECTION PLAN CS GROSE-SECTION PROFILE VICINITY MAP a TON LINE VERTICAL DATUM: PROC. WWI CIPP OP IWO. MO sang. •I•os Co.m. IP.S. OPER 001O OP OPPPMPO, GO 10....OIOZZO POUPPl el 00•0001 OP WM &MOM PPM At ODOM OtO ow woos Gramma. NOON AGMS OMEN MO Pi POMO POOP MOM IMP. P.P. rACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY O 170.10CT NCI •1h17 OSIALL/•• OATS 1-211-17 L ATEST Rev. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Ca. ft/M- 15 67 a/ 1137 .A. • ...V '4 it .• • .4 A .14r.raz-azr— w... ........... .....-- o • ... ca . 5 . _ ... ,. 1- . MM. 1750 ' Ng . 10.0 • Mg - 1450 , 11111. l'il• CAI ' eV. 1.194e 7C_ ..01V. C. a m,,,,. Com ausftwor" NM. 17.40 .11YV . a ,• xr CO • Ilof r5.40 AY 4.1.0 •WII/59IIMM,/ 00 • 6 I IVY •• 75 -/ AY 10111M1r■ IMO 11001111111. 4.0.1110. Ile nnona •■....,■• NNW MOM/ 1111■111,1 WON COPIII 111.11M. cir.wrr &X cr • CO 7 •117.576/1007N- 3.5' -155 00? • 0.25 0001.7017 tr7771.4.5 trof-n.5 own • /5.40 • . 71741. /5.40 47.4 . C - /00/ •;.V. 077.S. 4Z0 .fACC grgv &Awn rose- - 1. .,.t ••••• VACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY PACIOCICT ORAWN SY OG ISIKAIN oar. LATEST MEV. C2 a 5 • 0 • 3 2 2 a 1- 2 2 a 5 x CIVIL ENGINEERING ANO PLANNING CONSULTANTS r 0 P.I..•• 4101 MS= SsA CL MOM • GLIM AIM SPL ALAN =or. TO MAW CPIS ANIS e• rr •• In 400n 0401 1.0[ A min emu a" Kw NALL Al STT 0010.00 CLAM SOW STA !VW 14 OEM MR NM. SLATTALA AMMAR C.A f�T 1M Td TS LOTOffS ri.CNS SAO. •AL LAOTA M.OS K• MY •0•aAle PLAN WPC ODICSICAPAT Ss W SOTION Olt. Sri O .111010.4 SOLO. LOCA. APIA 00.01 M. API FLAII {•rp -S��r' aa..w �A 1l(IR' I��MAP 10 PILL \ %! Offnof 3 .°•.:.... PLAN VIEW) 11 QQTLYY •.R 013%.110 �.SYf IITI TSt W,O INUaLII Is G. OUT fl naa or 01•41.* ♦' C rCC rumaxe ratrit AWOL Y421 CATCHBASIN TYPE 1 CBI8, TYPE 1I 414 W /ORIFICE CONTROL DEVICE C2 reduce inOITI01a AT 42/OCT fled SMAD-Ur0•SS XL arna•gnu *CET OOTIAN ITAC OTI' A' MI CMCR MI • iote et 0111 11/.II00 CHC 5•00030 Tel GLAMOR GUAM YOU. D escriaTa0L 13•ILt.30'IR11. D 'Car Q Ci DR WY PAU) W name Tmmannoeomralnnaura. = jjTOI OalLf i0QD7i1. STORM OUTFALL ® EXISTING DITCH PIPE CROSSING ENCASEMENT OIL/WATER SEPARATOR OAP • UTILITY VAULT I•1S•211• (6A SPEEDBUMP • RAM. A natnII•W/itD9� /// own LIT. MCC Plan) IQQ mm CMG 3•000n IL•11 00•WHIT C0•6.31f OIT WnwS KAM .2.11f3 aa•et eared Qrana•lIW VALI POfO31 EOM I@10. DETENTION POND nwittl • II'/LC STAND —UP CURB TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION (9. NEW PARKING SECTION (10 L' AC TSCPC(TY 1•Q 0vulm RAAD.RTr. re.) DJMU. LANAI (ANnTL. %MCC, arm V L mrTALTto TO •q! rim( onnm ECC & PARKING PAVEMENT SECTION 11 • rte = Vrare AO Al ALLOW I-r 1_ II ACIAMILASAIN .1.MSw. •.• - POOP. ASCIMAT•OO a TIO PUMP SOAP A ST 0. WASPINCTON Y O CM...•• AP.ICAN PALO YLO TY • R 01 .LG1TSOLs, WIMP., w Yw `L...LP.LO •S 01,. TA PP APPILOAP. PAWLS 10 WPM. ACCIAACT ANAI 11001....T. TO MGM. Al PAIS LOCATIAD OM ANOLOPLAR PPM SAT.C. OA AP POP 01.0 111011. MAR 10 AI -tNIA I..OwATO. Lop op. pre Ai. • 010.A. 0111111010.1001..... ALT AI NIOMPAIDISIA • YYLiL..OY, W.T..LNCAMS fats COnY.�sT� Wb 0OLT•R WAS WW I. CONTI. 00.11113 •11 .. wYsOw[P WATTS CAA... PA... ACIATTAS APO TO MAMA TAC.1.20•02 AAA. AO 01.11.000 AA. MALL SA CLOD. NA. TOON TO 1.01.1i A. MAPS PAWS ACTA. Y. ACC.. COMMILACIt• PPP 10...111 .1101110.• 000.18.0 TATA TO AMA. 0100.11AL GENERAL & STORM DRAINAGE NOTES L P.AW Cm 0011. 010•10. • ROT OF THUM AMMO> AMA... IOU AA .. NAM Y/51,1• • W:• •0. rt�N wvLP 010.. C•OAK.00Y.. AOO plt YMii TwuA~Y. 1110.01 TTaa�OV•• WMPP o4L .001•0 POTS. 0 OPAL. TIALoAso To. ALA T. 000.0 ITSOPICATIOAL SILT FENCE �t °ACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY C CIVIL ENGINEERING F PLANNING CONSULTA/ i""•.aa• lot, T.`sa ts `��._ .� NY•N ars. r Y.... r was - •N • _ • 1 . _ rt • .rt MAYA ^A•••• a 1N // O 11NW E\EVA11ON• UNE nl `\ 14" Na. ...1 1. 1� /a OEM ELEVATION.A11111-i--N-L, 1 \ 1\ \ • w✓ it L ALL *it 1 , �••.' \ ..t .., Q I t 1 '�' J C i I I a Owls .... •L .i..i 1 •■ n 1 .N •y�Et-Y • - ryas •myna sus +Dla•.r•0 m orlon " co.� .. .. rwt Nana S am os. wows Ea ama:g . l • ?sabred -ass ae r.fo w Clay w yell. *no w ...a.. cod ...a. •.•. C.a. N .. coo uau . OWNS. ••..t. — 0. corm 1 law Nam. 50 al •* rr..� co al fry. •/.•... •[C tan MOM OlOM leamC ms•aa t•Y. L MO, R•yTON• lac L ROOD RAs O10nQCTON NNUAt1C L LONTt OP RmOVND it MVet NSt.CaatA • F6•NC RODS An. SOTS MUTATION LAMM =t t PACIFIC -•.a tC mwNT MSS NAOS • .YAM tot . *Ti 00.1 tu..11aN . WO Ot £LfaTg . rat •m Lords.. r••G COONS. GALEN •1.e• COM.Op.TO•. NNy AT cats a UiCDIUV 014(2 Nat .0 D AT (LC..i1ON ..1 •L17 S,NP.Cm ` a* .S UK• NM 10 D .•r.0LS.TUT of TAROS u•ST•TAN U1“.“ TM .s A CONY• VArn• VALUE ro• TIN URI S... V 00 n A VEGETATION LANE au coawo.a.• .ssilay W.a■••■• a. fo •corrals_ tar aerry N slaw wsas. •coaart.o p•. r S. ma •.ar..s.5 u •• forgoes. r •!l laeloeafo. 1•1oEC1. 111' . GE-17 ORAWN r OT -V•-OT LATIMINT R•• C NANSEN SURVEYING RENTON, WA 235 -8440 40 f0 1.114111 Or 0000 SOW MOWS U 0000110[0T 04 22 20 rM a .P » r w — 26 • • r•rrwa.lw so M / a. AIM,. IMMINIMIR T��wr _26 _ 22 ' 20 * y. 10 '. d•..a • .. e.a.r 11 00 i t6 Orme M 22 . 20 p I 1s • 40 LOOS Or 01760 60 1.00 0040? 00114011014111 WWI ItATIM .71.4010.0 0.010 iftem / lulu / 22 20 10 N — v -- - — -- -- -- O 1131.1:01101111= CIL 011.2. Swell lJ 10 24 21' • 10 • 1-.w .anr 12 M 1r• 24 11. 20 0.naa w.' 0 +00 0 +50 1.00 0 +00 0.50 1 +00 0+00 MUN .Samos Now .r.r ?num* 18 0.50 23 Sou I 24 0+50 1.00 1 +00 0.00 rACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY N cc 0 PQOJICTn DRAWN Or ISSUE OAT. 1.ATOOT 00 C CIVIL ENGINEERING P PLANNING CONSULTAr