Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-07-90 - CROONQUIST ALFRED - WW GRAINGER ADDITIONW.W. GRAINGER ADDITION SOUTHCENTER SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK 76Z6 (l.dedo/ 8h/e) EPIC -7 -90 vvr ENVIRONIVIENTAL REVIEW ROUTWIG IG FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO Buiiding E Planning EPIC: — y- 9a Pub Wks Fire 1 1 Police Parks /Rec PROJECT al.. G(/ ADDRESS �G�s- 72,249 ,r/id. DATE TRANSMITTED 2.46 % RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR / jel/zse„d DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project.. Please review and comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT Date: Comments prepared by: , 09/14/89 FEB -2 21990 --ENVIRONMENTAL—CHECKLIST Con, No. Epic rile No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No.‘62,3 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: r1 . G 2. Name of applicant: Atfrc AttfVed raav1v1sfi I A Vail I tle.17b 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: FGI rvaii1 2 � 14•060 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1Y1 Cswids 6'1140 JUNG Moo 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N.10 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Na hG 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NOrtee 1=44101 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. New. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions r-lated to this checklist. , 14-14-42S4A Th Ted 6Xed i ligitr-e-switti-01/11-444-1/- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? - � r J t — tg oar 1+?42 ate# - 11rr-rAt tiitar -3- •TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1.j ` iy j' (!2770) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Poinuthilti gt ��f.� G7MJ1 4 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc ion (for example, a phalt or buildings)? 4j..��6 X85 7o) Q Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give .•proximate q ant'ties if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. +�w c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:011gt, 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river .t flows into. tg ►F.DO fuT 4114tettit 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. t, 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.__ e� 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Kane, 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. s/ge50, 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. N,, Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Nib, 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONe c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, descri•e. �. -� -�l• AV AI/ A 4, AW -114 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. t4p, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: HOW. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Nr deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs X grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation m-xvb LA.Hdecapniq, b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? ea G _ke_reti/evtA c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ►yene . . Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver as fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Neng: • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 51fa tit wadi CaYeca • 1 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be usec for heating, manufacturing, etc. _Will We 0.1 11-z r b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Al c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce o control energy impacts, if . y: , _ le -II _ • R Ii c75-;1■ i..= .!!.r_ mfr ".0if/.:S t1l 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. MONO. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. t401.10. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NONE. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. "rgApootAtil N015 E Rot FRPIA coNSTgucfloW EGIUIPMGNt PASSENGER CAR 4 SOME TRACK TRAFFIC. NomsE. DunINA NoKAULL $USIN .SS 4bURS oN A 4.QNG- TERM PXAS15. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? PRESENT uses inlCLupE M/ARENOUSES, OFFICE RETAIL AWD .e►S_qcj.4TED PARKING. AQJAcetAr "o9ERTIE.S sAMe. U s S . b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. YES, THE SItE IS IN 14 (*Keen! 'AVM ✓ a..t.. w4Ic1-1 +SAS 76r*EN OSEa Eog ACgI!CQI.iVRE. ►N 1141 PAST c. Describe any structures on the site. E X1Sll N 38, Coon sQ. Fir wAR.E +loose, Off RETAIL P3UILWIh1(,,. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? G•■ f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 1,141.11. INOUSTICIAL g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? UR13A,I h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project ?_►PEROXIMATEJ1 A'ti j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Arr( MATrI.x t4OME k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NoNE 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NONE • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing • a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? No►JE. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. ^1ONE.. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 140tE- 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? AQL'mon1 To $uiLPiN6• NCiGNT 15 To 8E 32 FEET. grER.og BuI4pn1401 A ATERI_AL 1b 8E, rPEc.45T LokcatE.T1r AMP cot4cRETE A' A►SOMIRY v N STS, ?MOW To A■ATtN F,,t 15T1 ,44. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? N10,4E, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: L.ANDSCApl,C, Ju-L 8 . PRo■Ifz+E.fl. • 11. Light and Glare • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? lAgKii•G 1.-or 1.-1_(.9HT1r16 WALL '86 o%IIpep. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1J c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? T- Q i _. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: riot.15.. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1.)or1E. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. tJ o c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NOr15.--- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. ..Jo b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 1407.31E., 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways - serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. -Opp 13001-Ev'6.1Zr, IS r+}>✓ Nx,A,ir1 To Soc -rn4C 14T . SocrT 4 ) 4PLJSTT.wL . rr NITE4e.t4EcTs TEL M/e3s -r ✓A. LL el- 4t WA0i e.4.1s-r' of -r4 SITE. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Y $. MEiKO sro{ps cam.! v✓e -ST' 0a14- Ef 41 6Nwwi , A rrtiOX u \sSTEL.`I 45 0 Peer 17151 4T. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? j lAmy, i 5T1LLL5 E. �pEv ? ?LAN S. 1$ nl br✓ STALLS v.f oe- appePt 7:5 5TAL.1-5 Aga E ?U ___ cop.. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 1.10 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 1,J C) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 37t� AVE42ACyt. ,./E44410RA'L vot-uttes via) L47 =oz. $E fw e:e44 7:30 aN.v 8: 30 aM 3o p,A g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: pJoNe.. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. N O b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. IJoNE. 16.' Utilities a. Circle utilities ricity to e.hone, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only currently available at the site: retuse service) sanitary sewer septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. �LEc t ci rY : fl/Ger 500nlP fo JEeL A1.117 LIG ►+r 0245 ti-t i WTbhl AI1�.T€- 4_- Ca0►5 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. ,TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? rjo c44ss4:IC,E-. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? NO 6C-1"'' Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Nora � Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Us.e Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? ts30 - pApl- E-11iorJ Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 044a446:( 1:erIGEr1T A42- 4oNDITIoi.111■IG ON IT'S. 11.1Su1.ATIotJ Iti1 �/ss.t2Ehioc � AN17 TAIL. A206.6. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? jJ0 l445 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 7.10r)E. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? )..10 erred' • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: 7J0tJ0:1. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? wii-3- , -r ZoiJn..1 cope, ce ro.2its.. 6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Flo �FF6c r Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 00K1 e- 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. tlo Go�IFLIGT • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Njp. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: t�lonl TQ BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, . documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To coral ocr- ra. 17, 700 $auAr-E Foot A1747 rr ("NI 1r0 ar l E)CI STrN& wAg - aasE. /ge r .'L. ./oFFtce. 8uu-47inI ..JP Tb REIN" PE-I- Ai, Agog ,MATEL -'( 5000 scavo.RE SET" OF ArJ O f E- 4 4j 5. .L.ES 1i►R�� . 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? No W s rAB L.E. A.c-T'E,RNAT I /E$ reEN Fo Ft.JF?. . Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: W.A., • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? QC) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: W.A.. -23- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: OCT 17 r` ALFRED CFICIONLio ARCHnters The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A F F 4 A V IT I, DIANN MARTINEZ . Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting EI Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [] Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit OF D..I STR I:UT ION hereby declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of ,'Von - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Other Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on SEE ATTACHED Name of Project W.W. GRANGER File Number 90 -2 -DR APRIL 10, 1990. • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on Thursday April 26, 1990, at 8:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission Public Hearing CASE NUMBER 89 -1 -SUB: ALPINE ESTATES REQUEST: Preliminary plat approval of 13 -lot subdivision for 5.76 acres parcel zoned R -1 -12.0 (Single Family Residential), located at approximately 65th Avenue South and 153rd, Lot 19 Interurban Addition. CASE NUMBER 90- 14 -SPE: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL PARKING REQUEST: Approval of a temporary cooperative parking agreement to provide for the construction of Foster High School and resultant changes in parking availability and location, located at 4640 South 144th Street, Tukwila. Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing CASE NUMBER 89 -16-DR BOEING ADVANCE SYSTEMS REQUEST: Development of curb, gutters, sidewalks, covered walkways, seal coat, landscape improvements, and an approximate 9,000 square foot cafeteria and outdoor dining plaza, in an existing paved area, located at 9303 East Marginal Way South. CASE NUMBER 90 -2 -DR W. W. GRAINGER REQUEST: Design review approval for 17,700 square foot addition to warehouse /office /retail use, located at 7625 Todd Blvd. Persons wishing to comment . on the above case may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday April 15,1990 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners, File # # #if # # # * * * ** * * ** * * * * * ****** * * * ** L * * ** 4. k * * ** : * * # # # # * # * #*# * **## = #**# * # * * # ***)6Dk*>k BATCH.NUMBER: CV- * CUSTOMER NAME # —*** **** ycliev * * * *y4**Poyvvy*vmmyyvvyylvyvv ryt * *y ***,,,* *,roe * * ***y *,* * *4%** *fir * * *811gy • ALFRED CROONQUIST. COMMENT. 788890-0040 -05 „C,Qi QRAJ� PRQ_QERJY : INVESTOR4 9999 ",3 DAG HAMMARSJOLD PLAZA ' `, 305E47TH, ST; NE W_. YORK . NY 788890- 0111 -09 10017 EVERARO`..WYLDE E.MERGENTHALE C0178 18475 OLYMPIC AVE S SEATTLE,WA 98188 788890- 0130-06 SOUND FLOOR COVERINGS 9D4075 18375 OLYMPIC AVE. SO TUKWILA•WA• 98188 788890- 0160 -09 CORPORATE PROPERTY,INVESTOR439999 3 DAG HAMMARSKJOLD PLAZA 305 E 47TH ST` NEW YORK NY 10017 788890-0080-06 _StIkWA4ADEVLOPMENTCO 5301 SECOND :AVE S SEATTLE WA'' _ 788890-0121-07 ANIXTER BROTHERS. INC. 4711 GOLF RD SKOKIE.IL' 250178 - 60676. 788890- 0153-08 DAVIS D & PETERSEN.E•C ROSE 0679 PO BOX 88164 SEATTLE WA 788890 - 0160-09 98188 Anixter Bros. Inc. 18435 Olympic Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sound Floor Coverings 18375 Olympic Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Seawest Distributors Inc. 18380 Olympic Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 A. Magnano 18393 Cascade Ave. South Tukwila, WA 98188 • McKesson Office Products 18351 Cascade South Tukwila, WA 98188 Unistrut NW 18401 Cascade South Tukwila, WA 98188 Valley Industries 18409 Cascade Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Zep Manufacturing 18417 Cascade Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 1 Paper Craft Specialty Co. 6701 S. Glacier Tukwila, WA 98188 Marketing Group Mail /Ad 6700 S. Glacier Tukwila, WA 98188 Holiday Parks 6601 S. Glacier Tukwila, WA 98188 Kamper Cushion 18475 Olympic Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 geit9.,rfr4 • WBI Companies 18437 Cascade Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Transco N.W. 18441 Cascade Ave. S: Tukwila, WA 98188 Unical 18449 Cascade Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 April 9, 1990 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 r\pR 91990 • "`Y ! ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS : • ;! ' '.: '''• UNION SQUARE BUILDING • SUITE 3404 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 • (206) 682 -2690 Attn: Mr. Mike Aippersbach Mr. Jack Pace, Director of Planning Subj: W. W. Grainger Addition Gentlemen: In accordance with your request at our meeting of last Friday, I am submitting the following on behalf of W. W. Grainger, Inc. 1. FIRE LANE The owner's intent is to provide a fire lane access on the east side of the building. The owner will pursue an agreement with the building owner to the east to develop a joint use fire lane. 2. LANDSCAPING Landscaping plan has been revised and will be subject to approval prior to issuance of a Grade and Fill Permit. 3. PRELOAD The preload proposal is to include preload to the south property line under this contract. Please see attached soils recommendations prepared by GEO Engineers. 4. MICROWAVE DISH The owner has requested the placement of a microwave dish on the building roof. The placement of this dish will be reviewed for aesthetics. Please advise if you wish further information or clarification. ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS Alf ed H. Croonquist, .I.A. Attachment / • D...0c. 14 • 7/..//////:/,, / , • / /1 •54 0A.-• •-•••• P. f• prOVC7 .7 ) \ \ • 0 \ 7 _ uso.tt it....f.4,Zi..1..1"&ritL:,. '"-crste IS3 tEI ritt=7:-,Lat", 0' 0 "lAr-e.•+-6,-AJe es114.',Orl 414 ../••• • 0 A .....,...• ,7,.....7 ',- .:',7 .....' 1--- fr.....7 4...Yes .... , • 7. • • __ , • %I. t4lf R, ..... 7:: ....;:, J i's .-t:',.,,_;_- );=•.: :—. ......1,....r.1-7.,,,, :II 1 't ©/ ..- 7-:".- r-", \ ■ ----r."-,Irl.""'. ' .! . :f.' 1® - _ , ,__,,, , ......... te ......co • V=I:rgAe reitT74. , , Le 71.41A, - I OWN( ;IL; • _ .;; I tai-icwiatar ' r ?;) ) *0.9 1 ..• 1 t'IJILViru! .NlociCH0-11O0 4 A.,.. :•-••- a. ,--,LA of....e..p, Wm Wm DRAINER BOUTHCENTER SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAWING INDEX SHEET A - I - DESCRIPTION rie• *COOP nwri, Wore, P .OH. 9144. V00,1 FiNIAN von.- 4..**4 L en A - OPA,A..• A.f.A 4.LA4k, cA40rpOr4 etEr.2...p.AN ,A. • I **V1* re,T.Vri A .0 44.1A' - C. 00.774,4, A - - s • COX. rr./.11.1.( IsRLAPi .5e.41Lo. 5 4- +Oar Ofe. S • 0 5 • c, OfeHONAL Pea,16.7 .LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12.1. ara.alrtlao tat ....het t. bor.:97.0/ feet at Lac 7 '"IrVtrW.7: re.:arels of Ill, ..ty. warsrotoo. ▪ Mc Ca... at al.. State al 14a...ea, GENERAL NOTES 1. Contfector ne.•11 ...en arra Wilt. cornier 1'. GUM, allatrular .1' coon.. with las Subs all bases. co. mid UM. Wel. as sounrs for moo elettelad eoulbmoot. 1. WI.. • I I sonars r expos. emu. molt. all aor .11 ref.. dr ears regold.s. =iral 1. utivrislarn 11.1.C. not la ...ft,. 7. All stay malls . partition. loIrtn. fors. lora. sr. r fire P. fiend Crer.c. shall Cowl rpm. protect. OPO • •rooll 7' I. valves. Pay Depornst corectseas. electrical traalftestes Oeten. 1. All aeon. soled. exits... be re. per .0 sta... frls Pow heron .11 solders to 0.0.f. Sect...310MM u. ...au fire aloes. lose stellar trio,. sr extlerrimor leers. shall ha ...in pos separate parrs ar approval of Pau.. Sonar sof lettno lour. rouse rt., raper lesseraht. fa. Oarless 1 nnnnnn . (112/SS,-.11. to be coo.. moo., ar us run.. fire 12. Rec ust deft., suf.. essessor 1r. irroursts aril he urn. for trout. pp., 4r7L As..e4 • 4 77". Z17.0 ACP-, 0.02770 7, In.f.Ai .470 1,43, ACE, PI, • 7. GO.. Urea . rer, • 14•61.10.: .7.1.77.4a4r, Cuba., ;; TUKWILA WASHINGTON VICINITY MAP 1.110J1C1 NO 1.4.1 111.7001111. 4. 6- ie W.W. GRAINGER ADDITIONS / ALTERATIONS SOUTHCENTER S. INDUS T TUKWILA WASHINGTON boa 4144o ALFRED CROONSILEST ARCHITECTS ON. Ua0N 11101UAR1 MALCOM NUTS 3100A IIINATTLat WAS100.01.13N INW10.1 f111001041.1.110•0 IMP NO O0 .a, a c.+w� .ar EXVirIN• 00114;I46 b- .�wsTa +.r:ll WO' WACG10V+6 AD2ITION E■• � I � w ,w• A 0 ` wia. u ne ft- nw. tCwIDSTw •,luo• nua av O N ritn -Tum. rlwW Pilo,. 9✓a.0 G`C.M Q 10- 1U■PWn CM ••••• nn �� 0.O is1.D L,PR 1 w.0 ♦'F4 9— 1S McLIIN My1• E.Y1+N NI GNl -um 0 i'oL. {}}} 1- 1'4Ewor.e. !pm, ��1� au� Y Oro WYK. WAWA. I9 -10 "C G'C.4 VJQbYr L/WOWA•1� ID 1lJWY L- ANL'GJGAPE PLAN (� A.YMWIL AvlNVS mf -r YJ7 7u YJ7 • co F-ILr MLL_I•ICVVI 1UIUlJ 1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PAGES: r. lib ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SQUARE BUILDING • SUITE 3904 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 4aioi • (204) 082,2690 FAX TRANSMISSION' AD/3 govg.tveTO ,ad D.yot. . • 4/0/796q:6 APR 9� 90 09:2FR D ROONQUIST_ARCHITECTS ceo Engineers: April 2, 1990 Alfred Croonquist Architects 600 University Street One Union Square Building, Suite 3404. Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Al Crouncluist P.2 /6 Consulting'Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Report Geotechnical Consultation Proposed Warehouse Expansion Southcenter South Industrial Park. Tukwila, Washington, for the W.W. Grainger Co. File No. 1963 -001 -801 INTRODUCTION The results of our geotechnical consultation for the proposed expansion of the W.W. Grainger warehouse in the Southcenter South Industrial Park in, Tukwila, Washington, are presented in this report. The warehouse is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Todd Boulevard and Olympic Avenue South. The scope of our services is described in our proposal dated March 16, 1990. Our services were authorized by Mr. Al Croonquist of Alfred Croonquist Architects on March 20, 1990., Mr. Jack Tuttle of our firm directed the original geotechnical study and construction monitoring for the existing 220 -foot by 180 -foot dock - high warehouse building while with another firm. That work was accomplished in 1978. The preload fill placed during the original site preparation extended 25 feet beyond the south wall so that subsequent preloading of the planned expansion area would not materially affect the existing building. We understand that present plans are to extend the dock -high building 100 feet to the south, with a possible future addition area extending • GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405140th Ave. NE, Suite I05 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 74664200 Fax. (206) 746 -5068 . . "• RECEIVED APR 3 1990 ALFRED CROulate7 Ainamms APR,09 '90 09 :29 ALFRED_CROONQUIST_ARCHITECTS gliEngineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 2 P.3 /6 50• additional feet to the south property line. A new parking area will be provided on the west side of the expansion. Details of the near -term expansion are shown on foundation and floor plans provided to us by Alfred Croonquist Architects dated March 2, 1990. The purpose of our services . is to review available subsurface and construction information for the original building and to develop recommen- dations for earthwork, preloading and foundation design for the expansion aim —No field ouplorationa hav- hear, accomplished by our firm in the expansion areas. We have made a judgmental assessment of probable soil conditions based on a nearby boring and test pits by another firm, and construction and performance information for the original building. SITE DESCRIPTION The original building was constructed in 1978. The building area ,preloaded to a height of 2 to 21 feet above floor slab subgrade level. was The full- height preload extended 25 feet south of the building into the proposed expansion area. Following construction, the fill that was pla,,ea eha expansion area was graded to about floor level immediately adjacent to the building and crowned to slope both to'the sides of the building and to the south away from it. Settlement of the exterior walls of the original structure Appears Cc have been rOlptively uniform and within acceptable limits, based on observations we made on March 15, 1990. The expansion area is now covered with small brush and tall grass. Subsuriace conditions. in 1..ba earaudi4H area veva onplorod by Dames & MnnrP in 1978. These explorations indicate that the site is underlain by alternating layers of loose and medium stiff sandy and silty alluvial soils, some of which are moderately to highly compressible. The alluvial soils become medium dense below a depth of about 20 feet. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We conclude that site preparation and earthwork procedures similar to those used in the original construction will be appropriate for foundation and floor slab support of the near -term and future expansions. Additional fill will be required to establish floor grade in the new area. A preload APR 09 '90 09:30 ALFRED_CROONQUIST_ARCHITECTS Geoke.Engineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 3 P.4 /6 program will be necessary so that postconstruction settlements will be within tolerable limits. Monitoring by our firm will be necessary during construction to assess the adequacy of preloading, general earthwork and foundation preparation activities. fare preparation nna earthwnrk shnul tl br. 0.6wwww11.5h04 durieA prolon ,od dry weather in the same manner that was used for the original building. All vegetation should be removed from the expansion areas. Existing fill in the expansion area should be graded to a uniform thickness over the entire expansion area and thoroughly compacted before placing additional' fill. The excavation and replacement of native soils recommended below for perimeter footings should be accomplished prior to placing additional building pad fill. All new structural fill should consist of clean sand and gravel containing lama than 5 percent .Blum .(m.0.0, :idl passing the tin. 100 rievo) by weight, relative to the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve for placement in wet weather. For placement in 'dry weather, a slightly higher percentage of fines can be allowed. The fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with the ASTM A -1557 teat method. Structural fill should be placed in 10 -inch -thick loose lifts and should be placed up to a level of at least 4 inches above floor slab subgrade level. Preload fill should be placed over both the near -term and future expansion areas to a minimum height of 2 feet above floor slab subgrade level. The too of the preload fill should he located no closer than 20 feet from the south wall of the existing building. On the east and west sides of the expansion areas, the preload should extend for full height at least 5 feet beyond building lines. It will not be possible to place preload fill to full height tn. 5 feet beyond tb, .494th limit of the future expansion because of the property line. In this area, we recommend that the toe of the fill be carried to the property line and that a preload fill be placed to 4 feet above design floor grade along the south limit of the future expansion area. The width of this elevated preload fill, should be 15 feet APR 09 '90 09 31 ALFRED_GR44NRUIST- ARCHITECT5 u GeoEngineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 4 P.5/6 as measured from the top of the slope at the south limits of the fill to the point where the preload fill is sloped to the retraining preload grade on the north side of the berm. The results of the initial construction indicate that much of the settlement will, occur fairly rapidly. We expect that settlements under the weight of the building pad fill plus the preload will be about 2 to 3 inches. The major portion of these settlements should be complete in about two to three weeks. We recommend that the magnitude and rate of settlement during preloading be monitored by installing at least four settlement markers within the expansion areas. The markers should be installed after the area is cleared of vegetation and the existing fill is regraded, but before any new fill is placed. The markers should be surveyed before any new fill is placed, on a twice- weekly basis during filling, and at weekly intervals thereafter. Settlement readings should be provided to us as soon as possible after each observation so that we can maintain an up -to -date plot of the informatinn and advise when the preload can be removed. We recommend that wall footings be supported on a minimum thickness of 2 feet of structural fill and column footings on fill extending 3 feet or to 1/2 of the footing width below the base of the footing in order to reduce both total and differential settlements. The subfooting fill pad should ' extend outward from each side of the footing a horizontal distance equal to the depth of the fill pad beneath the footing. An allowable bearing capacity of 2500 pounds per square foot may be used in design for footings supported as recommended. This value applies to the total of dead plus long -term live.loads. A one -third increase in the allowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short -term loads such as wind or seismic loads. Exterior footings should be founded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Interior footings may be founded, at a minimum depth of 12 inches beneath the floor slab. The minimum widths of individual column and continuous wall footings should be 3 feet and 11/2 feet, respectively. APR 09 '90 09:32 ALFRED_CROONQUIST_ARCHITECTS GeoEngineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 5 P.6 /6 We expect that footing settlements will be on the order of 1/2 to 3/4 inch. Differential settlements of up to 1/2 inch could occur between aajacent unequally lueded footings. A major portion of the serr1 mints are expected to occur as structural loads are applied. The floor slab may be supported directly on the sand and gravel structural fill pad. We expect that floor slab settlements on the order of 1/2 inch could occur. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during earthwork and footing construction. Our representative would observe the excavations for footings and the placement and compaction of structural till. A sufficient number of Ira- pliu.. o dasiaity taste should be porformPrl as the fill is being placed to evaluate whether the specified compaction is being achieved. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this consultation. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact us. GMB:HRP:ia Four copies submitted Yours very truly, 0 gineers, Inc. on W. Koloski Principal •oa# .4LtAr-- Herbert R. Pschunder, P.E. Senior Engineer Geow $Engineers • • April 2, 1990 Alfred Croonquist Architects 600 University Street One Union Square Building, Suite 3404 Seattle, Washington 98101 Attention: Mr. Al Croonquist Report Geotechnical Consultation Proposed Warehouse Expansion Southcenter South Industrial Park. Tukwila, Washington, for the W.W. Grainger Co. File No. 1963- 001 -BO1 INTRODUCTION The results of our geotechnical consultation for the proposed expansion of the W.W. Grainger warehouse in the Southcenter South Industrial Park in. Tukwila, Washington, are presented in this report. The warehouse is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Todd Boulevard and Olympic Avenue South. The scope of our services is described in our proposal dated March 16, 1990. Our services were authorized by Mr. Al Croonquist of Alfred Croonquist Architects on March 20, 1990. Mr. Jack Tuttle of our firm directed the original geotechnical study and construction monitoring for the existing 220 -foot by 180 -foot dock - high warehouse building while with another firm. That work was accomplished in 1978. The preload fill placed during the original site preparation extended 25 feet beyond the south wall so that subsequent preloading of the planned expansion area would not materially affect the existing building. We understand that present plans are to extend the dock -high building 100 feet to the south, with a possible future addition area extending GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746 -5200 Fax. (206) 746 -5068 RECEIVED APR 3 1990 ALFRED CROONOUIST ARCHITECTS Geo Engineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 2 50 additional feet to the south property line. A new parking area will be provided on the west side of the expansion. Details of the near -term expansion are shown on foundation and floor plans provided to us by Alfred Croonquist Architects dated March 2, 1990. The purpose of our services . is to review available subsurface and construction information for the original building and to develop recommen- dations for earthwork, preloading and foundation design for the expansion areas. No field explorations have been accomplished by our firm in the expansion areas. We have made a judgmental assessment of probable soil conditions based on a nearby boring and test pits by another firm, and construction and performance information for the original building. SITE DESCRIPTION . The original building was constructed in 1978. The building area was preloaded to a height of 2 to 215 feet above floor slab subgrade level. The full- height preload extended 25 feet south of the building into the proposed expansion area. Following construction, the fill that was placed in the expansion area was graded to about floor level immediately adjacent to the building and crowned to slope both to-the sides of the building and to the south away from it. Settlement of the exterior walls of the original structure appears to have been relatively uniform and within acceptable limits, based on observations we made on March 15, 1990. The expansion area is now covered with small brush and tall grass. Subsurface conditions in the expansion area were explored by Dames & Moore in 1978. These explorations indicate that the site is underlain by alternating layers of loose and medium stiff sandy and silty alluvial soils, some of which are moderately to highly compressible. The alluvial soils become medium dense below a depth of about 20 feet. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We conclude that site preparation and earthwork procedures similar to those used in the original construction will be appropriate for foundation and floor slab support of the near -term and future expansions. Additional fill will be required to establish floor grade in the new area. A preload ro Ges Engi o 4qneers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 3 program will be, necessary so that postconstruction settlements will be within tolerable limits. Monitoring by our firm will be necessary during construction to assess the adequacy of preloading, general earthwork and foundation preparation activities. Site preparation and earthwork should be accomplished during prolonged dry weather in the same manner that was used for the original building. All vegetation should be removed from the expansion areas. Existing fill in the expansion area should be graded to a uniform thickness over the entire expansion area and thoroughly compacted before placing additional fill. The excavation and replacement of native soils recommended below for perimeter footings should be accomplished prior to placing additional building pad fill. All new structural fill should consist of clean sand and gravel containing less than 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve) by weight, relative to the fraction passing the 3/4 -inch sieve for placement in wet weather. For placement in dry weather, a slightly higher percentage of fines can be allowed. The fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with the ASTM D -1557 test method. Structural fill should be placed in 10- inch -thick loose lifts and should be placed up to a level of at least 4 inches above floor slab subgrade level. Preload fill should be placed over both the near -term- and future expansion areas to a minimum height of 2 feet above floor slab subgrade level. The toe of the preload fill should be located no closer than 20 feet from the south wall of the existing building. On the east and west sides of the expansion areas, the preload should extend for full height at least 5 feet beyond building lines. It will not be possible to place preload fill to full height to 5 feet beyond the south limit of the future expansion because of the property line. In this area, we recommend that the toe of the fill be carried to the property line and that a preload fill be placed to 4 feet above design floor grade along the south limit of the future expansion area. The width of this elevated preload fill should be 15 feet Geo No Engineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 4 as measured from the top of the slope at the south limits of the fill to the point where the preload fill is sloped to the remaining preload grade on the north side of the berm. The results of the initial construction indicate that much of the settlement will occur fairly rapidly. We expect that settlements under the weight of the building pad fill plus the preload will be about 2 to 3 inches. The major portion of these settlements should be complete in about two to three weeks. We recommend that the magnitude and rate of settlement during preloading be monitored by installing at least four settlement markers within the expansion areas. The markers should be installed after the area is cleared of vegetation and the existing fill is regraded, but before any new fill is placed. The markers should be surveyed before any new fill is placed, on a twice - weekly basis during filling, and at weekly intervals thereafter. Settlement readings should be provided to us as soon as possible after each observation so that we can maintain an up -to -date plot of the information and advise when the preload can be removed. We recommend that wall footings be supported on a minimum thickness of 2 feet of structural fill and column footings on fill extending 3 feet or to 1/2 of the footing width below the base of the footing in order to reduce both total and differential settlements. The subfooting fill pad should extend outward from each side of the footing a horizontal distance equal to the depth of the fill pad beneath the footing. An allowable bearing capacity of 2500 pounds per square foot may be used in design for footings supported as recommended. This value applies to the total of dead plus long -term live .loads. A one -third increase in the allowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short -term loads such as wind or seismic loads. Exterior footings should be founded a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Interior footings may be founded at a minimum depth of 12 inches beneath the floor slab. The minimum widths of individual column and continuous wall footings should be 3 feet and 115 feet, respectively. • • Geo ggi Engineers Alfred Croonquist Architects April 2, 1990 Page 5 We expect that footing settlements will be on the order of 1/2 to 3/4 inch. Differential settlements of up to 1/2 inch could occur between adjacent unequally loaded footings. A major portion of the settlements are expected to occur as structural loads are applied. The floor slab may be supported directly on the sand and gravel structural fill pad. We expect that floor slab settlements on the order of 1/2 inch could occur. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during earthwork and footing construction. Our representative would observe the excavations for footings and the placement and compaction of structural fill. A sufficient number of in -place density tests should be performed as the fill is being placed to evaluate whether the specified compaction is being achieved. We appreciate the opportunity to provide this consultation. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact us. (01RPS..�0kt,. to t L rG ;STEM`- 44.7 eSSiONAL EN s� jl�6) GMB:HRP:ia Four copies submitted Yours very truly, Geo gineers, Inc. on W. Koloski Principal 741-14 )144- Herbert R. Pschunder, P.E. Senior Engineer • • IP ° CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DECLARATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE W.W. Grainger Addition DATE: April 2, 1990 PROPOSAL: To construct a square foot addition to an existing warehouse /office /retail use. LOCATION: 7625 Todd Boulevard APPLICANT: W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Alfred Croonquist, Architects) FILE REFERENCE: EPIC -7 -90 and 90 -2 -DR THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review consisted of analysis based on the following documents included in the environmental record: Development plans (sheets 1 - 3) Landscape plans (sheet 1) Environmental Checklist (February 2, 1990) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BACKGROUND There has been no previous environmental review for this project. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The proposal includes the construction of a 17,700 square foot addition to an existing warehouse /office /retail structure, modifications of existing front entry, a 15 stall expansion of the existing parking, and additional landscaping. To accomplish the proposal the following actions will be required: Importing of approximately 2,700 cubic yards of fill. Construction addition. Construction interior alterations and add new entry at northwest corner of structure. Construct expansion to parking area providing additional 15 parking spaces. Provide new landscaping along a portion Olympic Ave South and adjacent to new entry. DESIGN FEATURES Exterior of addition will include tilt -up concrete walls painted to match existing color, adding building lighting to match existing, adding a new main entry which includes the use of low- reflective glazing. MMINI' P. 2 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition PERMITS REQUIRED * Design Review approval * Grading permit * Building Permit * Street Use /Utility permits CHECKLIST ITEMS A. WATER Existing surface water runoff from the site drains into the P -5 channel. The existing on -site stormwater runoff drainage control system does not include oil /water separators in the catch basins. This allows pollutants to enter the City's drainage system. Providing retro -fit oil /water separators on site at the northwest of the property before discharge into the City's drainage system would mitigate the entry of the pollutants. See Condition # 4. In addition, during heavy rains "ponding" due to drainage from railroad line occurs at the southeast corner of the site. Adding fill to raise the undeveloped portion of the site and the additional structure will remove a portion of the "ponding" area requiring a diversion of the runoff into the City's drainage system. Development plans should include provisions (biofiltration swales and /or piping) for this storm water runoff. See Condition # 5. B. TRANSPORTATION The intersection of West Valley Highway /Todd Boulevard currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C. The proposal is not expected to reduce that LOS, however, the intersection is currently experiencing traffic flow problems. Also, there are no sidewalks in the immediate vicinity requiring pedestrians (based on field observation) to use existing roadways creating unsafe driving conditions for auto /truck traffic. To mitigate these vehicular /pedestrian impacts, a number of specific measures to enhance safety and operational efficiency of the West Valley Highway /Todd Boulevard intersection should be required. These measures include establishing or repainting crosswalks, install directional signs for vehicular traffic, installing turning movement signs, and striping. .See conditions # 10 and 11. P. 3 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate since the environmental review indicates some impact, but no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. The mitigation provided as part of the proposal includes: An addition to the existing storm drainage system was proposed to provide drainage from the parking lot expansion. Additional Mitigation required of the proposal includes: A. AIR 1. To mitigate adverse air quality impacts of construction during dry weather, the construction area should be watered to suppress dust and the roadways flushed. B. WATER 2. To mitigate adverse impacts to water quality from siltation impacts, temporary siltation control measures should be review and approved prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 3. To mitigate adverse water quality impacts to the storm water system from sedimentation, tire cleaning provisions should be made and any existing catch basins where mud is likely to collect should be protected by filter fabric. 4. Existing catch basin at the northwest corner of site should be retro- fitted or replaced with an oil /water separator. 5. To mitigate the loss of "ponding" area for storm water runoff from railroad track, the development plans should include the provision of biofiltration swales and /or piping of runoff into the City's storm drainage system. 6. All building roof drainspouts and footing drains should be directly connected to the main storm water runoff control system or otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. C. NOISE 7. The contractor should provide certification that all diesel, gasoline, and air - powered equipment is properly muffled or silenced. • • P. 4 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition D. PLANTS 8. Proposed new trees should not be planted in compacted soil unless gravel drain sumps are installed under each tree or the subgrade soil is rototilled. 9. Street trees and other landscaping material removed from the street frontage should be relocated within the property line (where possible) and installation of irrigation provided. The timing of the relocation of the plant material (especially the trees) should be based upon the recommendation of a registered landscape architect and conducted under their supervision. See Condition # 10. E. TRANSPORTATION 10. The following off -site traffic improvements should be required: a. Paint the West crosswalk on Todd Boulevard. b. Install pedestrian signals for the West crosswalk. c. Repaint the South crosswalk. d. Stripe the eastbound approach on Todd Boulevard. e. Install "Left Only" and "Right Only" pavement markings on the eastbound approach. f. Install shoulder mounted "Left Only" and "Right Only" signs for Todd Boulevard. g. Install identifying signal signs under the signals for the eastbound right turn, eastbound left turn, and northbound left turn movements. These signs should be 12" x 18 ". 11. The applicant should install per City Standards a 6 -foot wide sidewalk on the perimeter of the site adjoining public right -of -way (Todd Boulevard and Olympic Ave South). This condition may require the removal of portions of existing landscaping along both Todd Boulevard and Olympic Ave South. See Condition # 9. 12. A Right -of -Way Permit should be required for off -site construction activities. The Permit should specify traffic control measures and haul routes for fill material. C. MICHAEL AIPPERSBACH Consultant Development Permits - Urban Planning TELECOPIER COVER SHEET DATE: Mar t 5daf I 4-4- 90 TIME: 12 M. SENDER: Ria/lOi AliffA6V-Aik PLEASE DELIVER TO: 91310_, IN THE CITY & STATE OF: 1-U KO TELECOP1ER PHONE: 493-i$33 NUMBER OF PAGES IN TRANSMISSION: 2 (including cover) If there are any problems with the material received, please contact the sender at (206) 523-3764. If you wish to send material to Michael Aippersbach, please use the FAX (1 (206) 524-7341. BILLING II: CLIENT NAME: NOTES: t. pa. obitus51,... (4/ krAlt, FU95e- rt Ack Deileivvvvimbi cliA, vv %L4) U 5c 94tek " "Ti/pv\k, 7 otsii,m5 p It? fe. kikt 5L. Ja P con.i.dsk., faxform file PO. Box 95429, Seattle, WA 98145-2429 • (2.06) .471..)-(+,14.)e 523. 374,if F i P r,— WAC7 197 -11 -970 LJ E L Description of Proposal IVAke4NAll Proponent_ _ VI). W. 1/ -1 P oC K GE8 M A i" DETERMINATION OF NONSIGN?P1CA.NCE 1_1 FA L 1(-79 e cem s iNe s of I47oa NiCL Sc__ 51-Am wc. C, rah C �'tivf Sz1v, cfT �� _ —. 3vt a d - 14 t httin L_� Div( S c U Avc/ii'd4A5 . 61 lok.aLlun of Proposal, including street address, if any fi3,3-11 (¢1-1 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC .._7-- °90 The lead agency for this, proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [, There is no comment period for this DNS [J This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Address Date Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.ONS ENVIRON ENTAL REVIEW ROUMIG FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO [: Budding fl Planning Pub Wks X Fire Police .Parks /Rec PROJECT ) ADDRESS �l�s- DATE TRANSMITTED 74‘,/�v RESPONSE REQUESTED BY STAFF COORDINATOR e ie eliZSo/f) DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED EPIC: - The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT Date: 0 /i0 Comments prepared by: 09/14/89 cxlnrlN4. 'ewm• - EXIOTIN6 4SVILPINb LONL RGTK 91OEN -t- PY f I.ANbGAp• r I;AN WAR - 1 -401J4 - ADDITION Iti pc- .&11k. Allrb- -(� 'V MPW AveNUB •'VTH 11a15/1 LAWN E%16TNb WDb. T7f. lab AGM- 'RIRRUM RED MAPLE TO AwizA4 ER inn Nb -, .0 4-CALM PHYLUM K.ArauRA 'MEE •l L i.' .. L PINIM CONTDRTA 5tt' PIUe. 4 -8' 24 PHGTINIA PRA! ERI - .. P40141A 5[x4 -.O REV C ,.p .151O1o[VOGNrJ¢a . l 'NWAIJ -EhOLA 10 Vi0.404UM TINUh hF�INhPVJ. NeuF'f' / RlNbeaN�VE7 Lr,JKU•JTwan -5 eALC g'G.G • 1t' 40.1U4IPPJ U7 L}IINP:iHIh VA-r, 601,0' .. "fi A.V bOL0 JUNIPer. , 1.6wa4'c . 'T5 HEO6RA • Nr.I.Ix .. paa *1- -Ivy. bk..; 444 3.0.4, • - 00 Ka* OTTO UJYKW LNJR2L- 15 -Ib "C 1,e; 121.1, EX.WrisC I,P4..054NPINt. 'RJ PLM^I/I . 1 FEB 2219.90 1. PROJECT N DAIL W. W. biAINb ADDITION, , ALTEhATIGNh h01/1HGENT1rIC 400TH INOUVfRJAL PARK TUKWILA 1' WA',HINbTON ALFRED CRDONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SQUARE BUILDING SUITE 3400 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101 MOB]BB2 -0690 MUT NO. rn uup'( / .. ///g/ // . / / / /// SHEET seat' DESG131P,TJON � es } sx .LEGAL DESCRIPTION L.a/ Ta >' 9'l 1HE N z- i4 19l4a1 kt .$ -Lo'T 7 O -rHe. rLAT of 60UTHcES1TeiK INp'ITKUL Mr-4 kK(o*YR•p IN JouAHE aj1 of. 11419 , {sk i, 22/07,14 AN171.4S . K&,0190h4 pp ;49.1.4r CoUI.91' ( WA4HI141 -4 •9rfuA1 .- !N '(Nt. 66+-1,411 T..A% 4— 41"II11a1-1 :Lems-r,i4` �+r GENERAL NOTES General Contractor shall .65157 weriti.,a1111Iieisians.and Ou116fag conditions ,• • . hefore. r>vnctng amt. i „.. S .. . Uncial rmtnctor shell meNleete+rltd1F Suns a11,Man.taM end d, access.apa,ing s .as,-reqativel for sceaar 1 on' lect / 1 obit wet l 18.010, 11 • ..ponad connote .a l l .a:' e11 .ert sMll eoefnii'a10 appl rabble ;efts', and, regu1atWs. .S: .see accWafnlsoap Owleps :to,- leution.ad size of reef epeofa9s for onWnical uputpe5t. lenti0tton•prr' 0h 1905 Wifon W11dIsp 6. Cblul- fin.eatln9utieere 9.I.C.; lb1:'le Contract). - .1. 1111 stud rails aa0-partittan, lsludies furred spaces. ihel1 he f1,0 9. .6mere1 fmtrecter shell furnish and 1esi.11 approved protective Nm . guards around 5:1. valves. Fin Caparteedt connection, electrical ,tremfenen e.d Ms pann. 9. ...ell doors, including tans. Shell 6e s$ed.per 05191 standards. • • 10. ' Emit door harbor. shell conform to 0.6.0. Section 510310). 11. • .CcHlete fire alarmi.'hne station. sprintlen_659 estleevlsher l.FOets •.he11 be submitted per separate permit tad approval of wshiegtee Survey, and hating 9urpau. Fac1.17 mutual. and tee emended fire Rpartaent. Fire lanes. bydrest leutiNa eno•protectin anion shell henil:anted • uecurr.ntir for nine approvals. ' 12. ' Mechanical and electrical systems; fa1W1n9 exterior serfaa•m tan- . grade /eprm.eaenta she11 roe soamitted far. secant. penr!t. . .'U. Wdenn. of roof structure to ramie erpased until- moisture mntnt of roof structure patnIal Haan 111 or Ins. e • 6 Mr I NGRriewf�YF. Latent 5t f0 Rotes I'e2 huritiAe:( ryr1E Atilt . 12D, b_4 •P = 13h411Dl940/ A1ti? • 'ex.vrr. . AWI)upN ap•GICL. ?101 orli1nq .•ratri0.W. zr.aoa ' 1.91A- WIC ACA. (oa 524 f. toop 9 r.W t•G f.) e IL7o11•9 1•(IG : IIIN N{1s+NYrJ.oiw . V,srt%�n1h( ffaulCC9 Ili c r 7f! 9TAU, NN .' •1'5 ../iAI.IS LOT CO4OAOH - . 4027/1. UTil.rrltfp ris1E 6U f101k $1IIU211•4'4e•7 Pero- 4.61.&11UCA1. 1pYhYnwx, To gtZOH1'laMie Ti 4.14 k5oi11oN: '. 9MAC9 NO, lo- 2x9 II) aeml•3 -lo • f122lr1.'N' //l lChl�i THC l 1FF k /L rAFK 1UKwIL /4 w N re - ALFRED CROONGUIST ARCHITECTS ONO UNION BGUAAB BUILDING SUITS 9400 BHATTLE. WASHINGTON 13B1O1 • CEOB)1569E-123E0 Ii'1'Iri 1111111 11111111 • rloAP( b4AlTl _<t ��{{. Al �nlK� tvuene-Acr ewe,* AHW iW 4noK9 Mx 414 . exT w_ •Mt1ZANINE. t.vE. L rLAN •uu • Ye'.- p -o, ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SGUARS BUILDING . SUITS 3404 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 913901 . [8087802-2BSO - fr '� I has �. v r' 1: _VA ION I .FEB 321997.E ! I.141 I•<0.4icWV Dart I.3.1( MU ION • ``h7711-7 i Cegri=1 fz UU t tNG W Rt%• r Tt omi-°: , - W/ tth16T<rl. ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS ONE UNION SQUARE BUILDING - BUITB' 3404 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 58101' (2087082 -2890