HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-09-88 - KEHLE / SOLLY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - 15,000 SF OFFICE BUILDING (6450 BUILDING)6450 BUILDING
(KE H LE/SOLLY)
OFFICE, PROFESSIONAL,
MEDICAL & RETAIL SPACE
SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
& 65T" AVE. S0.
(6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.)
EPIC 9 -88
•
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
May 24, 1988
Mr. David Kehle
12878 Interurban Avenue S.
Tukwila, Washington 98168
Subject: FILES EPIC -9 -88 AND 88 -3 -DR:
SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD ACCESS DRIVEWAY
Dear Mr. Kehle:
It is my understanding from our early May conversations that your office
would transmit to the City an agreement to satisfy City Engineer require-
ments by May 13, 1988. I have not yet received this transmittal and would
take this opportunity to restate my understanding.
The City Engineer requires that the Southcenter Boulevard driveway only
accommodate right -in and right -out traffic movements and a channelizing
C -curb be installed per City requirements. The applicant agrees to satisfy
the requirements of the City Engineer.
As stated in our earlier conversations, this agreement to satisfy City
Engineer requirements was, in part, the basis for issuing a Determination
of Non - Significance (DNS). Please be aware that failure to satisfy these
requirements will result in re- evaluating the DNS and would likely result
in its withdrawal. State law would then require setting aside all subse-
quent City actions such as Board of Architectural Review approval.
Please contact me immediately if I have misunderstood anything or if you
have any other questions.
VU /sjn
cc: Rick Beeler
Ross Earnst
File
Sincerely,
Vernon M. Umetsu
Associate Planner
WAC 197 -11 -970
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of. Proposal CONSTRUCT A ONE - STORY, 15,000- SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING
ON A 53,000 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL (SEE FILE 88 -3 -DR: 6450 BUILDING)
Proponent BRUCE SOLLY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD /65TH AVENUE SOUTH INTERSECTION;
SE 1/4 OF SEC. 23, TWN 23, RGE 4; TUKWILA, WA.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-9-88
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS
(l This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title
Address
Date
Planning Director
6200 Southcenter Boulevard,
� 98 Signature
T
Phone 433 -1846
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
• CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
lz -E(..L \ Li)
•
-S 0,1r
. CN
EPIC - 9 -88
FILE A-41 I
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: Q BLDG Q PLNG Eq P.W. 0 FIRE [] POLICE CD P b R
PROJECT 6450 BUILDING (KEHLE /SOLLY OFFICE BUILDING)
LOCATION 6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD FILE NO.
DATE TRANSMITTED 3 -29 -88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 3 -30 -88
STAFF COORDINATOR VERNON UMETSU RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
ITEM COMMENT
P3 - #1O: Add: Utility permits
F7 - #bi: Per Item 8-1 -b on P.4 & Item B -1 -e on P.4, the potential
cutting into shallow aquifers /& use of french drains
may cause a drawdown of groundwater.
P2 - #9: Southcenter Blvd. Arterial Street Improvement Contract
now underway will directly affect this development in
terms of obligation and design of sidewalk construction
and development of access onto Southcenter Blvd.
P2 - #6: Non - responsive: give specific time frame
P15 - #14: Access is discussed in the attached March 31, 1988
memo from Ross Earnst to the Planning Director
Limitation of access points per city policy and
potential rechannelization of 65th due to impact
on 65th Ave. S. left turn lane may be required.
As relocation of access points /limitation of
access points /compliance with Fire Dept. fire lane
requirements could have significant. impact upon the
proposed site configuration, suggested is these matters
be addressed now and resolved prior to this proposal
going ahead.
The access onto Southcenter Blvd. should take into
consideration a potential addition of a right turn
out lane bringing Southcenter Blvd. to the current
Property line.
17 - #16: Add, as a category on form: storm drainage (yes,
available)
�
L1 /S/8 -3
G . loss £4-ut —
CITY OF TUKWILA
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM
•
• CN
EPIC - 9 -88
FILE
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG n PLNG P.W. n FIRE n POLICE El P & R
PROJECT 6450 BUILDING (KEHLE /SOLLY OFFICE BUILDING)
6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD FILE NO.
LOCATION
DATE TRANSMITTED
3 -29 -88
STAFF COORDINATOR
VERNON UMETSU
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 3 -30 -88
RESPONSE RECEIVED
THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE
REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD
DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART-
MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH
CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE
MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM.
i /
ANIAMINPAS/
"A.61,0
DATE ,V3/
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. Form 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
Planning Director
Ross Ear
, City Engineer
March 31, 1988
New Building at 6450 Southcenter Boulevard,
Solly Development
I have reviewed the plans for development of the property at 6450
Southcenter Boulevard. My preference would be for the
development to use the joint driveway and easement utilized by
the Xerox building and King County Housing Authority. However,
the unadopted standards for access management suggest the
driveways be a minimum of 150 feet from the intersection,
measured from the back of curb to the beginning of the driveway
throat. Since left turns in and out of this driveway would
conflict with the left turns to 65th Street, I would require
right in /right out at that curb cut, with a C -curb in Southcenter
Boulevard to prevent the left turn to and from the driveway. The
development will be required to pay for the C -curb.
A. BACKGROUND
TAD
1,1AR 2 21988
Ci Y OF T UK`V 'ILA
FILANW41 D :PT.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant:
3.
4.
•
.r.
G .
Control,.
Epic File No.
Fee $100.00 Receipt No..2y //
4e>
Wigland phone nu •er of pl cant 4nd contact person:
Date checklist prepared:.
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Propo ed timing or sc edule (in luding hasing, if applicable):
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this pro.osal.
• ; %- it . /,Af✓IL
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
D. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
il.i �.�J�cI V2_ • �.!"�]R7n %����..' 1 _ - if' -_
11401 - r� 1
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to thi checklist.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
dE CUMPLtttU tar ANPLILAk
8.
ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Earth
•
a. General descri•tion of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hi y, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 05>
c. What general types of soils are found on the site,
(for example, clay, sand; gravel, peat,. muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural ,soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
!2IDr&tpl
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of-any filling or grading "proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
G -e ' 6A6121 V1 ►r t3 i IVOr
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings) ?'
1
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or '
other impacts to the earth, if any:
Ord ;! 4... . _s. •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
•escribe and •ive approximate q •ntities if known.
P. g!. ! iI V. � ". r.... ..4!r it !.,
.JO Ory e , 71rI. -f1'
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe. ..,,ysi !�.11 0 -.,. 1...•. -�.:I
►_ IP* ..r.- A _re 4!_ . . arm- ir
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
1.1e7
•
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
•withdrawals or, diversions? , Give general
description, purpose, and -approximate quan-
tities, if known.
'5) Ooes the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. 11II57
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials, to surface waters? . If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any .(for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or `the number of animals or humans
the system( ) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, a d runoff water impacts, if any:
Add! '.i_..' 2
rte. �� � -. // • IP _.,aP"
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
yldeciduous tree: 'er maple, aspen, other
/'evergreen tree: cedar, pine, other
1 'shrubs
_, !grass
pasture
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
_ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What. kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or alt-red? p�! , -i r►- ,!� ✓�. %i
c. list threatened or end ngered species known to be on
or near the site.
Evaluation for'
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to pr erve or enhance vegetation on the
sit , if any: .•44. i / -..e . /-- i ,a_
!, • • ∎. r,i2 / */14 or .0 i1P
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds', other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
SIG
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
klaia
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
c._ Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. (t
d. Proposed mea ures to preserve or enhance wil'd'life,
if any:
woihrog
•
Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor). will be used to meet the
completed project's.energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent l' properties? If so, generally
describe. j.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features. are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduc- or contr•1 energy
i .acts if a y. ,i.. "MAO
1.A' 1� .■ ELI :'>,r l!i,� _ I(,
_,2_ _92 .. 4✓ 1101:..id .171
7. Environmental Health
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Are there any environmental .health hazards,
including exposure ;to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. f
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health_ hazards, if any:
-10-
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
OP
2) What types .and levels of noise would' be created
by or associated with the project on a short=
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
0W 212L1,ir4
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if. any:
01.1.;%5Q rJgOOP
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
prop ties?
u
1 •
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. NC
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the Curren zoning. classification of the
site? ' 7 ,
f. What is the
of the site?
g.
current comprehensive plan designation
p. o.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
NIA
h. Has any part of. 'the site. been classified as an
"environmentall sensitive" area? If so, specify.
i. 'Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
j. Approximately how m ny people would the completed
project displace ?_
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if .ny:
�' (fU1" 1�
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income
housing?
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli.=
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low
income housing.
c. Proposed measures'. to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
14th
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not ,including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Evaluation for
Agency Use'Only
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measure to reduce or control
mpacts, if an •
!. .'.� ■rOf 1. le .'�%.�i./
fl'/. ►.11IM. I V 9 / /yi
1 im : irr 'long - 0
A is
aesthetic
•
A 64
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
X16 bishrk:11:611112
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be,a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
L5
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect yo r proposal ?_
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare i pacts, if.any:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational "oppor-
t ities are in the immediate vicinity? •
Or ,,, -
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
c. Proposed measures, to reduce or control impacts on
recreation,, including recreation opportunities to be
providedb,y the project or applicant, if any:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national,. state, or local preservation
registers known'to,be on or next to the site? If
so, generally delc,ribe.
b. Generally 'describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known ,tobe on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any: A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to t e nearest
transit stop?
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate ?_______
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(' ndicate whether public or private).
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, describe.
generally
7
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
Ir.:. �1•
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
s , generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. Circle utili,.ies currently available at the site:
electricity natural -gas l waterl ;refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate icinit which might be needed.
Kaa o
•
%F I!I.1" J 1 A' Jf
C. Signature
ll�
The above answers are )true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency
relying on them to r Ice 4 s"Qe isi
Signature:
Date Submitted:
is
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
•
BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction. with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect' the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous, substances; or production
of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or. reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine 1i;fe are:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
1
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
1
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:'
5. 'How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
• •
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
Evaluation for.
Agency Use Only
• •
t0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT ANO NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a,general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What •re the objective(s) of the proposal?
tr.A1.7111 1111 . 31111111P0401.
4111a -7117711InG4
-1 ii1/1111111 �
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
1■
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate they
preferred course of action:
•
4%s. :•'4 d /. .. 1160,11, _ ' �I�.•iI i!
��_.�: :f ar r Vii, �_, . • I :.,�:�►
•
.11771R, MACE!. ter. k
-22-
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
L1}0 141:112r--1
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1.1445,1
liroc5 F341,5.K.,
tt., 2. sp Orne.-1 -.
g.ero.rieo aiksaIR
51& Lk1 5E
Grak/F47;V4 - mere7/
I197 taccete 57254
atm, 5e/X t419 purr
lo
-4-
1.5“05C/Pe
NE, e 57.e14G.4
-7
-
97 55
BUILDING
15,000 SF
0.00. 957. •FF
r4
4'0•15ealg, Carpi l55
i5,445/5, 1.5445. ,15,/ •
• SIDEWALX
• LANDSCAVE
/455 Ift55/OP
Ii445544wt/4
00,2271
55
54224.25
,n,555•5 •455. C4,2//2 IMA/10114■TH
LAP535C.45.
SOUTICENTER BOULEVARD
SITE PLAN
SCALE 1" =217
ctrrtr fauFrInit
-axvwci.
rrr-r
11. tsku. 114.4.5/5/ P455;
*Ye net 4/50' 7.
ftwout '"xttfUlrtE14."'.
&Atte: 1,20
15 1
•
L
'404Z 5veHr5e bowl.
pima. 25 ee 544551' 5,?.
(54/ -1555 • ...K. 54045240
H991 '457552. Mt.
Firmi
41141c70 Soob
4 545405 2 MoZooke 5095450
liwuremgma
I'-" 2l,00 ammms e655 4154
-• im kr4,45/5 254551 1444.4554
1-6
e==. 144&10C4 f" 1.10141114 1-/=1-trg;a9 (VA
Ott,s;
LEGAL
That porlIon of ttm .. GI 111.ge I...nation Claim N.. At.
County, kteshingtrn. iatng Nurthgely of tRe Menton
Three Tree PoInt koa... and lytop ar0 South-
easterly of Macadam koad dna lylug yr 6Stto
Avenue South as conveyed to the ,Ity of Tukwila by
Deed recorded uncer Audltur's Filo No. 7105102420; -
H/0E111. WTTM ttmt portion of vac... Macadam Road
adjoining as vacated by rIty Of Tukwila OrdInence
Vv.tt7not;
PARCiti.
That portion of tne Wm. H. 01111am PonatIontislm No. to
In Township 71 North. Rat, k Last. W.M.. deeertbed
as follows.
2:u'rgnUer'3611=
TO.7121P1;11:=.1::r1I 11:.4.27.!:722P1I0
being Engineer's station 13.ed0 a: from which the
Southwest corner of said Settlor. beers South
0.11,2. Last 204.06 feet. ttmnot aeuth
Es. 16.1.24 root. thence on • curve to,the.rIghl.
;:sr1;97.1(111. '0'00 .".
eel. ttmnce on e curve
't.c.:V%I.72:':12/.;11•er'anic
on • curve to the left havIng • radius of T16.14 '
.7.0 feet: thence worth 1.7.0,7" East 201.68 fvrt.
:=1:gtz70:7:1 Tr4"
Point of eginnIng. thence North 6,59- rastt1.65.0o
f••t • more or 1•••. to the lmst eel r aurgIn of 65th
Avenue South. as ,ormerod to the CIA, of Tukwila by
Deed recorded under Auditor, /Ile No. T2010703.,
therme Southeasterly along Re.terld mare., 0'
65th Avenue South ta the Northerly margin or the
Macadam Rood. th•nce Pe•te•ly ada aouthwesterly elan,
sat., Northerly mare! n or tn. Mocatlam ROad 2•0. Oh feet
more or 1.s. to • voInt from .1,3c. the true po...t
beginning be•r• N .... . I k • Last. thenc• Nortn ael 1
East 96.71 fe•t. more or lesa to the true pot,
begirmIng,
•
TOCETML14 WITI that partIon of ',Act... Meekdue
Agr AV,
1,45-4,4 4441:44 44,444446 ...4414,1-4911.
SUE and %AIDING STATISTICS
•
PAPKIN AttAllatil Pr-Wed...nal A Irod.cal: I ,.1■0100 t.
S11. rhrtd •■ .0
21.1 11.. AKA: Out, qe,
Okrithi, a.. 116“,,,, t ‘41ct 6 ,e-tricr
ttend../.1
tot, • 1,1,3
VICINITY MAP
6,* cawbbuo ti-o• I-1104
vioaxklmeo ii,kivee 55557
WIe"°'
I. l tuaa
yeagettoo
Wen.
69es pito
4164A'Al4
UP V51.. I a,
tgate•ItT,
5,41
PROPOSED NEW BUILDING
a
1
1
it
�a
d
it
U1
IN
5
PROPOSED NEW BUILDING
FOR:
6450 SOUTMCENTER OLVO
TUKWILA, WARN.
(david kehie,anchitect
ssattls, washington 98101
2061
Snooks. by
•
�I
VA"
t
.,r�r� •;;; �t ►1..AAroul�pr•yq /NL111tl►NI��(�.
'it.i�•. •
rs.fl V
V p a =
2
PROPOSED NEW BUILDING
FOR:
6450 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
TUKWILA, WASH.
& davld kehle,arohitact
wattle, waahington 98101
12061
4 s
INTEGRATED
SITE
DESIGN
9701 Raw, wKRai
Soak Warm= 99103
209.5479702
A
•
VICINTY MAP
"'At,
/
•
/ 5r
PRELIMINARY GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN
5.52'
4
BLDG. F.F. = 40.0
1,Story Sprinkled
oP rtc. ssre.
PP �.sr..D s
uP�cE . T Ew P e l
�� .ArEU sEP.n.rw �
PVC
�1Jl -iJ]I�
•
_�•a PEA Dir fi
Southeaster Boulevard - zS
CFIST
Dn ILM. List's rs
LEGEND
—S5 -0 E usrnO SAW afra sE•E.
- - anOVOSED ,5POT EEE riOn
viS70.15 0.0a at.
I N.cmr P•V[urur
•
E
0
U•C
ca
v=
to —
ff
(OLD
C to
E2
mm
D
Southcenter Professional Building
T
W
0.
E
0
U
c
m
E
0.
0
d
m
0
O
CD
1
Y j C i 2
10)
N