Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-11-89 - DICK'S TOWING - TOW TRUCK AND VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITYDICK'S TOWING TOW TRUCK & VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY S. 134T" ST. & 44T" PLACE S. EPIC 11 -89 • City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: NOTICE OF DECISION 89 -1 -UCU Dick's Towing Develop site for towed vehicle storage operation SE corner of S. 134th Street and vacated 44th Place S.; Lots 1 -5 Fostoria Garden Tract. NE 1/4, Sec.15, Twn 23, Range 4. The City Council conducted a review of the above request on August 21, 1989, and found that the request should be denied. The action of the City Council on all matters shall be final and conclusive unless, within ten days from the date of the Council's action, an applicant or an aggrieved party makes an application to the Superior Court of King County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. Name: Title: Date: CC- NOTDEC PitiAto &v. .2A1 1989 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWIL4, WASH! NGTON981X8 August 22, 1989 Dick's Towing, Inc. 2012 S. 146th Street Burien, WA 98168. Dear Sir: I'HU)NE k (w 433.180 ) Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Attached you will find a copy of the Notice of Decision as passed by the City Council on August 21, 1989 pertaining to your request to establish a tow storage operation at S. 134th Street. The request was denied. According to the Tukwila Zoning Code, an application for an Unclassified use permit which has been disapproved by the Council cannot be resubmitted to the Planning Commission within six months of the date of Council disapproval. Please call if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your interest in the City of Tukwila. Sincerely, Q %)leadle-1-4/ Molly - . Headley Assistant Planner Attachment AFFIDAVIT OF 0ISTIBUTI0N •, • I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: (XX Notice of Public Hearing CITY COUNCIL ❑ Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet E] Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Notice of Application for E] Other Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, AUGUST 10, 1989 , 19 (SEE ATTACHED) Name of Project DICK'S TOWING File Number 89 -1 -UCU n. nuntstK: CC COMMENT -DICK'S TOWING STONER .NAME Y K CHIN UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER'S W /IN 300' iiik *l ************* Ar4 it et it At* dr lee etaielritieJtet et, et* kit re sir :t* tfe*it re.ewiiil **4.4.Ife i riiiiiii� 261320- 0131-03 JOHNSOWMABEL' 13136 42ND S SEATTLE WA 98168 26132040134-00 GAYTHER JAMES W 4334-S 133RD SEATTLE. WA 734560- 1125 -04. NORMED -SHAW PARTNERSHIPP PO BOX 3644 SEATTLE WA C0475 9816r3 769999 98124 734920-0255-03 HAMILTON JOHN G +GERALDINE F519999 4749 W MARGINAL WAY SW SEATTLE WA 98106 734920-0340 -00 CLARK.WENDALL G +CLAUDIA 8 769999 3033 NE 7TH RENTON WA 98056 261320-0132-02 G lY TTLE WA 734560- 0722 -03 SARANTOS GREGORY S & PETER 0579' 2722 SW 151ST ST SEATTLE WA 734920- 0040-0 98166 734920- 0245-06 SIRIWATANARONG LYNOA 9659 25TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 619999 98106 Occupant 4310 S. 131st P1. Tukwila, WA 98168 Occupant 4308 S. 131st P1. Tukwila, WA 98168 Occupant 4306 S. 131st P1. Tukwila, WA 98168 Occupant 4304 S. 131st P1. Tukwila, WA 98168 Occupant 13130 - 44th Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 04 ai4 4 � �j�� �'•d t T+' i 1 ' htAl 9r4 . S CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila City Council will conduct a Public Hearing on the 21st day of August, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Dick's Towing has requested a permit to develop a site for a towed vehicle storage facility and truck towing operation at the S.E. corner of South 134th Street and vacated 44th Place So. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on same. PUBLISH: SENT BY FAX TRANSMITTAL: FAX NUMBER: FROM: 9 CITY OF TUKWILA Maxine Anderson City Clerk VALLEY DAILY NEWS - August 10,1989 August 8., 1989 854 -1006 CITY OF TUKWILA Maxine Anderson, City Clerk 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1800 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 27, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Cagle, Kirsop, and Knudson. Mr. Flesher was absent. It was noted that Phil Verhalen has announced his resignation from the Planning Commission due his moving out of Tukwila. Representing the staff were Jack Johnson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MR. KIRSOP A MOTION TO APPROVE THE JUNE 22, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Pace, Molly Headley, and Joanne MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. 86 -52 -DR - HEATHERWOOD APARTMENTS - Request for approval to modify previous B.A.R. approval to allow construction of 66 carports and 14 garages. Commissioner Knudson excused himself from participating on this agenda item to avoid creating a conflict of interest. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report and pointed out the area of the request on a site plan. Staff recommendation is approval of the request subject to conditions as stated in the Staff Report. A letter from Mr. Paul Dudley (Attachment ".F" of the staff report) was entered into the record as Exhibit "A ". Mr. Henry Mora, R. S. Development, representing the applicant, agreed to the request to put the trees in as requested. Mr. Paul Dudley, President of the Sunwood Homeowners Association expressed a concern with the trees which have now been removed. They provided screening for the Sunwood complex as well as a pleasant appearance. He expressed further concern by the lack of shrubs as screening, the impact of the ponding that now takes place and which has not been taken care of as indicated by the developer. He challenged the Board to insist that the builder execute the Boards decisions. Planning Commission July 27, 1989 Page 2 execute the Board's decisions and conditions. John Hunt, Planning Consultant for the Sunwood Homeowners Assoc. stressed that the effectiveness of the landscaping should be an important consideration of approval, as well as the type of landscaping itself. He was also concerned with the surface ::_:d subsurface drainage which runs off into Sunwood; that the land- scaping on the narrow rocky ridge may not survive; and adequate screening from the Heatherwood Parking lot be provided. He distributed photos of the areas of concern which were entered into the record as Exhibit B - E. Discussion ensued on the proposal. MR. CAGLE MOVED AND KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE 86- 52 -DR, HEATHERWOOD APARTMENTS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE GARAGES AND CARPORTS, PROVIDED THEY MEET CONDITIONS 1, 2a and 2b AND THAT THE BUILDING AND PLANNING STAFF BE INSTRUCTED THAT ALL THESE STIPULA- TIONS BE MET BEFORE A CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED. THE CONDITIONS READ AS FOLLOWS: 1. Project drawings shall be modified to show pitched carport roofs. 2. The current landscape plan shall be modified to reflect: a. Increased shrub density along the Sunwood /Heatherwood boundary from 60 plants at 6 ft. spacing, to 90 plants at 4 ft spacing, as agreed to by the applicant. b. Maximize natural ground cover and minimize barking to enhance plant growth and visual harmony. This should result in 90 percent ground coverage in three years. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 89 -1 -UCU - DICK'S TOWING - Request for approval to develop a site for a towed vehicle storage facility and truck towing operation. Molly Headley, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report . recommending approval with conditions as stated in the staff report. A letter was received by the Planning Department from John Hamilton expressing his opposition to the development. This letter was entered into the record as Exhibit "A ". .4 Planning Commission July 27, 1989 Page 3 Lawrence Shaw, President of Normed, owns property to the north of the site under consideration and expressed his concern with the potential impacts a towing and storage yard will have on his operation. He felt it would deter from the niceness of his operation and feels this site is not appropriate for this type of business. Another type of business might be a better blend with existing development. He submitted photos into the record as Exhibit "B" and "C" depicting other uses in the area. Mr. Becker, owner of adjoining property to the south expressed his concern regarding the impacts of this use to the values of surrounding property, lack of quality landscaping, and traffic impacts from ingress and egress from this operation. Ken Chin, architect for the potential owner, assured the Commis- sion that the owner intends to maintain it in a aesthetically pleasing manner, and appropriate screening will be added. He pointed out that 2.5 days is the average storage time for im- pounded vehicles, and traffic flow will be an average of four trips a day by the tow trucks. Melvin Dickey, potential owner of the property, stated that he intends to make it a first class operation, and at his present location, there have been no complaints. He assured the Commission that this is a towing company, not a parts exchange nor a wrecking yard. He suggested that the Commission put a "watch dog" type of control to ensure their intent is carried out. Matt Little, Western Pacific Properties, pointed out that illegal outside storage of 14 - 15 vehicles, which are not screened nor fenced, are currently allowed to go on at a location to the south of this site. He was in favor of the request. Discussion ensued on the proposal. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO DENY 89-1 - UCU. MOTION WAS DEFEATED WITH KIRSOP AND HAMILTON VOTING YES AND CAGLE, KNUDSON AND HAMILTON VOTING NO. MR. CAGLE MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE 89- 1-UCU, DICK'S TOWING, SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH BY STAFF - -ITEMS 1. a -d and 2. AS FOLLOWS: 1. Landscape Plan revised to include the following: a. Provide 15 feet of landscaping along SR -599 consisting of trees and /or tall shrubs. • �/ • Planning Commission July 27, 1989 Page 4 b. Move the fence along the existing private road back five feet and provide landscaping. c. Irrigation plan for all landscaped areas. d. Applicant will provide specifics on type, height an design of fence to Planning Director for approval. 2. Applicant will be required to submit plans for future build- ings /structures on this site through the design review process. MOTION PASSED WITH HAGGERTON, CAGLE AND KNUDSON VOTING YES AND KIRSOP AND HAMILTON VOTING NO. Mr. Hamilton asked that staff follow up on all areas where regulations have not been followed, (i.e., black plastic used as screening, illegal vehicle storage, etc.). 89 -6 -DR - BURGER KING - Request for approval of design review for 3,600 sq. ft. Burger King one -story building with drive -thru. Molly Headley, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report, pointing out the location on a site plan. She stated that approval is recommended subject to conditions as stated in the staff report. Mr. Hamilton felt that in order to adequately review a site design, staff should also include the sign design in the mater- ials supplied to the Planning Commission for their review. Mr. Cagle felt that SEPA conditions also be incorporated in the staff report for consideration by the Planning Commission. Mr. Vincent Verrese, 2000 - 112th Avenue, Bellevue, the architect for the project described the sign design, landscaping, ingress and egress features, as well as design of the wall separating the proposal from Tukwila Pond. Joe Miles, Seattle Audubon Society, addressed a number of issues of concern which included adequate screening of Tukwila Pond from the glare, sound and movement created by the business activity. He felt the first choice should be windows looking out at the pond from Burger King and the second choice being a masonry wall. Because of the many questions posed and concerns expressed, Mr. Hamilton felt that a decision on this project should be delayed. • �� • Planning Commission July 27, 1989 Page 5 Joel Beneliel, Spieker Partners, felt that they needed to get started on their project while the weather is favorable. He clarified the ingress and egress of the project and felt that it will not be an issue, nor will parking be an issue. He assured the Planning Commission that the wall design will satisfy the noise, light and movement impacts to the pond. He further assured the Commission that litter is of utmost importance to Burger King. Ed Parks, representing Burger King, described the configuration of the dumpsters and screening. Public Hearing was closed and discussion ensued on the proposal. HAMILTON MOVED TO ACCEPT 89 -6 -DR, BURGER KING, WITH THE CONDI- TIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY STAFF BE FOLLOWED, EXCEPT THAT ITEM "d" SCREENING DESIGN BE APPROVED BY STAFF, DEVELOPER AND THE AUDUBON SOCIETY. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. KNUDSON MOVED AND KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT 89 -6 -DR, BURGER KING, WITH THE CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY STAFF BE FOLLOWED EXCEPT "d" SCREENING DESIGN BE APPROVED BY STAFF WORKING WITH THE AUDUBON SOCIETY AND THE DEVELOPER. MOTION PASSED WITH KIRSOP, HAGGERTON AND KNUDSON VOTING YES AND HAMILTON AND CAGLE VOTING NO. A recess was called and the meeting was reconvened at 11:05. DIRECTORS REPORT Mr. Pace discussed the status of the Cascade View annexation as well as some of the issues the Planning Commission will be dealing with in the coming year. He then introduced Michael Quinn and Gordon Clowes, King County Planning Division who discussed housing trends and facts in King County. August 10, 1989 was set as a work session and Public Hearing on the Cascade View Annexation. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Re (spectful submitted, nne Jo son, Secretary CitAf Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared July 21,1989 89- 1 -UCU: Dick's Towing Ken K. Chin /YKC Architecture and Planning Develop site for towed vehicle storage operation SE corner of S. 134th St. and vacated 44th Pl. S. Lots 1 -5 Fostoria Garden Tract. NE 1/4, Section 15, Township 23, Range 4. 44,340 Sq. Ft. (1.02 Ac.) Light Industrial M -1 Light Industry Non - Significance issued July 18, 1989 (a) Site Plan (b) Landscape Planting Plan (c) "Typical" office structure 1 ' STAFF REPORT to the B.A.R • •)- 1 -UCU: Dick's Towing Page 2 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description: Develop site for truck and automobile tow and storage operation. 2. Existing Development: The site is being used as a storage yard for contractors' materials and vehicles. 3. Surrounding Land Use: Office /Warehouse development to the north; vacant land to the west; SR-599 to the east; and construction contractor to the south. 4. Terrain: Generally, the slope does not exceed 1.7% with the exception of the drainage swale bank. BACKGROUND An unclassified use is defined in the Tukwila Municipal Code as a use that possesses "characteristics of such unusual, large - scale, unique or special form as to make impractical their being included automatically in any class of use as set forth in the various use districts previously defined ". The site that is proposed for development is currently being used as a contractors' storage yard for materials and equipment. The location is highly visible from the adjacent freeway and to single family homes to the northwest which overlook the site. As a result, the aesthetic quality of the proposed development should be a prime consideration. The proposal is for storage lot only at this time. The applicant has stated future intentions of . constructing an office structure similar to the type pictured in Attachment C. DECISION CRITERIA In evaluating the appropriate placement of an unclassified use the Planning Commission and City Council will use the following criteria typed in bold in granting an unclassified use permit: 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The proposal as presented consists of a gravel storage area surrounded by an 8' high cyclone fence of which 2' will be a barbed -wire extension. Thirty foot high STAFF REPORT • • 9- 1 -UCU: Dick's Towing to the B.A.R. Page 3 light poles will illuminate the lot at night for yard security reasons. As presented, the proposal could negatively impact adjacent development. The current office /warehouse development to the north is attractive and well - maintained. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the same standards for parking, landscaping, yards and other development regulations that are required in the district it will occupy. The proposal is located on a "through lot" which is defined in the Tukwila Municipal code as "a lot fronting on two streets that do not intersect on the parcel's lot lines ". Under the Zoning Code, the applicant has two front yards and is required to provide 15 feet of landscaping. The applicant has provided 15 feet along South 134th Street and none along Highway 599. The street frontage along South 134th Street is shown planted with red maples with an underlying groundcover. Both sides of the lot, to the fence, will be planted with low shrubs. The remainder of the side yards do not show landscaping. The proposed 8' high fence will enhance the security of the lot for the owner. No design detail of the fence has been submitted by the applicant. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses. The proposal is a passive use of the lot as presented and is similar in type of use to the existing adjacent contractors' office. It is, however, dissimilar to all other adjacent uses including residential and office /warehouse development. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. APPLICABLE POLICIES — COMMERCE /INDUSTRY Policy 1. Encourage the grouping of uses which will mutually and economically benefit each other or provide necessary services. Most business land uses, when grouped, complement one another since the clientele drawn to one will generally frequent others. Advantages are also present for the grouping of warehouse or industrial areas. This policy is intended to encourage this planned grouping of complementary uses and thereby maximize the drawing power or reputation or each grouping. This concept could minimize business failures and promote prosperity in the business community. Policy 3. Encourage aesthetic building and site design in working and trading areas. 1 STAFF REPORT • to the B.A.R. • 9- 1 -UCU: Dick's Towing Page 4 How an individual property is developed has some influence on how other properties develop and the quality of development in the City as well. In essence, the cumulative development of all lands in the City is how the City's image is created. The encouragement and attainment of this policy has a significant value to private land owners in terms of protecting their investment over the long -term and for the local citizenry in feeling they live in a City they can be proud of. The use of setbacks, height and landscaping requirements can encourage this policy. Policy 5. Promote renovation of areas which are not aesthetically pleasing. Although the City has large, well - developed business areas, there also exist other business areas that need face - lifting. Although it is difficult to legislate improvements to structurally$adequate buildings, other economically reasonable tools can be used to minimize the visual impact by sign code enforcement, screening of outdoor storage and encouraging landscaping and other exterior improvements such as painting. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the potential adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. As part of the environmental review process, the SEPA official has approved the proposal with conditions. The conditions of approval are: a. Storage vehicle lot will be coated with an impermeable sealed surface to be approved by the City Engineer. b. All additional requirements that are deemed necessary by the Department of Ecology concerning sewer and water elements will be fulfilled. Applicant may be required to obtain additional permits from the D.O.E. c. Applicant agreed to a No Protest Agreement to the formation of an L.I.D. for widening and improving South 134th Street to accommodate a 60 -foot road width and construction of sidewalk and street lighting. CONCLUSIONS 1. The adverse impacts on abutting property can be diminished by improving the aesthetic quality of the development. 2. The landscaping plan should be revised to provide a dense evergreen screen around the perimeter of the lot. The type of fence could be redesigned to provide a more attractive presentation to adjacent property owners. 1 STAFF REPORT • • 9- 1 -UCU: Dick's Towing to the B.A.R. Page 5 3. The location is highly visible to users of the freeway ramp on Highway 599, which is one of the main entry points into the City, as well as surrounding residential development. Based on the preceding points, it is important that the aesthetic quality of this development be as high as possible. 4. As shown in Attachment 5, the applicant has offered inadequate compliance with code requirements in regard to landscape areas. The quality of this development could be improved by appropriate landscaping. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Staff recommends approval of the Unclassified Use Permit with the following conditions: 1: Landscape Plan revised to include the following: a. Provide 15 feet of landscaping along SR -599 consisting of trees and /or tall shrubs. b. Move the fence along the existing private road back five feet and provide landscaping. c Irrigation plan for all landscaped areas. d. Applicant will provide specifics on type, height and design of fence to Planning Director for approval. 2. Applicant will be required to submit plans for future buildings /structures on this site through the design review process. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION F Df STREET 05') - 7) EXIST. FI EXIST. VAULT LANDSCAPED AREA- -{- EXIST EXIST UGC O ASRNLT -• UTL. POLE-- • i I3- -0- LANDSCAPE RTBACR 25' -0' BLDG. SERINO( EXIST. CONC. CURD AND GUTTER -- N 41 °44'57 E EXIST. PRIVATE ROAD (VACATED 44TH PL. S. /RUTH ST.) OLD F O ST. (20')._{- 1015 8. 7. 8. B. AND 10, BLx. 4, AU. M RMRTON REPLAT OF 1015 1 TO 5 FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS ACWRONC TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN U. 13 OF PUTS PG 40, RECORDS Cr KING COUNTY. RA; EXCEPT THAT PORTION 1HETWOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE IOW. BY THE COUNTY OF (INC. CITY OF SEATTLE UNDER (INC COUNTY AUDITORY FXE NO, 5152157( EXCEPT THAT PORTION 1HEREC9 CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HWY.. BV DEED RECORDED UNDER AIJDITOY5 FILE NO. 5719585 AND 5738757: TOGETHER MTH 114AT POt1104 OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING THAT ATTACHED BY O'ERAT1ON OF LAW VICINITY MAP NO SCALE . NR SC1E[x- 25 -o• 24'-0' F[ 101 10 15' -0. 12' -6:18 -0* STALE G 9' -0 0 FUTURE BUILDING PAD (21'044') LOT 9 -- ERTURDED CDC. CRS (TN.) -CONC. STRIP FOR GTE KELS -20' -0. GTE --4' PAINT STRIPE (TYP•) - EXIST. LICIT POLE TOR REI9700 (TYP.) 'O Q 20' -0• GTE \_20' -0' CONC. DRIVE-, EXIST. HNIT POLE (YEP.) LOT 8 GRAVEL 4 -YARD - - -- B' -0' N1. CYCLONE 11XCE R/ ADD SLANT SCREENING AND 2' -0' 604113-RIREIERTENSICN. (TYPICAL) ----EMT. LIGHT POLE ('48.) 366.38' THIS AREA TO BE LEFT UN- RRROVEO. LOT 7 -- A.D.P. PAGING AREA S 41044'57' W 269.71' PROJECT PARTICIPANTS CLIENT: DICK'S TOWING, INC. 2012 SOUTH 146T4 STREET BURIEN, WASHINGTON 98168 ARCHITECT: YKC ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING P. 0. 905 70356, 2215 NW MARKET ST., STE. H SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98107 (206) 783 -3856 CIVIL ENGINEER: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 - 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 251 -6222 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LYNN WILLIAM HORN & ASSOCIATES 10828 GRAVELLY LAKE DR. SW.. P. 0. BOX 98967 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98498 -0967 (206) 582 -6984 SURVEYORS: LUND & ASSOCIATES 2220 SOUTH 2871H STREET FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON 98003 (206) 839 -7755 / /, LOT 6 / / A9, - -5. -0. 8LOG. SETBACK TABULATION -FENCE SCREEN -- •ER15T. DRAINAGE S4A1C APPRO)(. S.F. (1[ OF SITE) SITE AREA: .44,340 S.F. FUTURE BLDG. AREA: __ _ . 1,584 S.F. (4% PAVED AREA: . 6,363 S.F. (14% EXIST. PRIVATE ROAD: __.._..__4,427 S.F. (10%) DRIVE AND PARKING AREA: _ -. -1,936 S.F. (4 %) GRAVEL STORAGE AREA:!. 31,160 S.F. (70% LANDSCAPE AREA: _2,155 S.F. (5% UN— IMPROVED AREA:______ 3,078 S.F. (7% PARKING REQ'D.(FUTFR. BLDG.):._._ . _4 STALLS PARKING SHOWN: .3 STALLS PARKING AVAILABLE: +/— 70 VEH. * 75% IMPERVIOUS RATING DRAWING INDEX SW./ A 1 SU 1 C 1 C 2 L 1 DESORPTION SITE PLAN, PROJECT INFORMATION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN ATTACHMENT A `d ng�W- W Cr l O W 0- w0 st •wZV� 20+ ~6 06 U 0Di� 'DRAWNCS'. SITE PLAN PROD. INFO. DRAWN _'KC _._. CIECk[D: - APPROVED:.. ■PI A1Y /' 1XNLII4 (0 sTSEET • i o' Y m , r'er 4 xnb 9 alrIt . 0F! . *1 /7i : LI. I,1 ,T- 1 rep. L_ - M4.*or.‹.TJmP', roc. j, 0..0nTic $ LANSIC PE AMEX ■ 211' -0' OLEO. A00499 EXIST. CD. OURS AND OUT H�d 7lwlri. WP.. _ N 41 °44'57' E EX- IS- T. PRIVATE ROAD (VACATED 44TH PL. S. /RUTH ST.) 366.38 EXIST. VISE n1px Tom' Jj-1.- EXIST. VAULT EXIST. EOM Or EXIST. 07L. POLE E4' -0• L.E.•. af10E OLD (a ST. EEO') •.0.P. PAWNING MIN S 41 °44'57• W 269.71' nwrr tI aeya• 4T •iTio0 CFIcJar15 or s sll obtain •1l�nits •rod .0 •ny far .lrad am sort . late. M. the .04.c.• von• we ohms. and any dneiprr/build Irriwtlw I. notify lorgtlW,• of 611 utilities prior to an wort. Adjust work w..lgn crtgulred. upoend/or naoval of the u. Kier approprlK• 1• ify Ioorotiw of all ss.0pprioior t any .l, *II .deers. 0ordltice.na . pn•aml. to M. •rMlt•cts .M /or owner • •..anion, prior to cOrrectionsModIfi.tiosa. Cbntrmor• shall confer. and Manly with •11 rsgul•tlw• ee r.qulred by the pvrnment•1 ep.nglea, .1. NI• proton occurs within. .mope of wore •ha11 Ircl00• •Il rtr/•le, 1•.r. Koiseent• end setae. its neoesrn to eao•p11M to ...Wee. end moll preparation, plrcrent end grad]. of tepee., ✓ emoval of ..sung Mica aro laualed to be res... `l.ee• ett of epeqlfled p1•nt r fort Itrin . -1. . rdmolc•nt. rleblng, ipproprl•t• • protection. rine..ore. guarrt. •M es .r an bcnt or plt em •tl•1, clrn- p. debe1• removal, do...I/build Irrigation mow •M eny other item* required, were• emery or Incidental to Coml.b a wort •awn • ppcclffade Lend. Contractor hall roll rgr.ad utilities or Mr.. ..or to •n f Ao Mould r • conflict• a present .teat tha drawings or7sp•clfic•tims and s site toolltlona, Me land. 11 lemadi•.ly notify Me b, agin••• mod /or coot. r, prior to proceedlK rlth ter.. I. Abar.l•tls for ...ion of landscape pion.: ▪ .c- . Il100. 0e.bel led ber.lppad, cant 0 0sd. t.n 1• • In.•alnls, Le•Iandecsse Pr..., max. •em.IS. •. MI oroadrower plats 11 b planted o. •noon on the ea per detail.lprewlead, ad)rtaante .111 be q mo La only. awing en prgpw . Mange. t u .rim prior to them.. • of Ing v 0.11. brought t -La's Imo.' SCALE, 1'.40' -0' 061124) s. Moto.'' the sale. lm mo11 to • doe. M 6• prior to any topeoll placement In 11 plant , hods. hand till where W ee off ell tech• I• .lime.. and 1•r9•r. pap• S. depth of -v.7 .1. tap or approved equal In these planting Md.. o▪ tetlll Into the •ulgrade •oil. Chi* 5• layer of te.eu, sone hods mom require mere than n the minims S. depth of topsoil, ad)uat se 'spired. to bring 9re... r • of flush vlt0 t*0 0p of curb or paving. 011 esairod to •llw me for tor w M deep layer o▪ f the now top•0(L y Mx e0P 1e • pv sad q anthems. Comae*, ....11ug. -y.1 co approved Koala In the yl•ntlm of the 103 trees, throb• and 1 gallon can be med. Tn. ground... otop•oll mi.turel Melt brg.etotal'ofr 7511 o shall •hoes •pelf1. t 11 with the blwxo Mies f Me omit• sermon, •1110, with all • I• •M larger rmed. hl. N•.• Sulam together. 1• • of ell remaining unused •. iKlng Ile, 0IG If 00.11•. V0rlfy with genarel wntr•cter If unused anus to be •y ertad r .Its. 0•.nlp this prior to bidding. LeM•c•pe contractor Mall provide lb u vltn • I.. litter nMlylm of the topsoil for pp.cvel. ]trip all w.[tim rsed. /arms plot c. •� topsoil Ilearnt or r n Ming. e.. 11 debris o from .L. bed. 4111 a to the . ler... of the b prior 1 only r Mpproml of ouch. 7. " planting, •M twit tie occur ea reethell•.ht. eM width. p awn In moll under tor plant'pit•. C1 trmtor hell test the pit of drains°• problem. If any problems •ncost•r•d they shall be bought to the LA'. • tone ton to. correction, per t the eonVCter taking ▪ roposed •9e lotion shall eaapproval by the LAS u pon l4 q t Modem, that t Is • ▪ able. no plants will be •lll4ed t a p during time of prolonn0 I nary. sod bring timer. M o topsoil 1• In • wt or nuM7v condition. Plant , •.n• 'ism of locally M-E6-06 0. rennin...1l tans and •nrune .M 1 gallon proadto*n VIN .Ion r Ian. formula la0,110,. tablets, I .- par lm .camnd.tlwn.. Agritot• Most :slat. or crowd ego.. e. All rich In plant Made ens" approxiaetoly 1 /1..Ion •11 adjolnlna herd surcecr, roe. edge., too of tvrbe, etc... Mulch shall ocsr only in ell Plmnt `ado In Mlcn Mlu. M p0. 2* depth p 00 Mulch shall be I• depth of nut l r an •metered q Krthmet remade. Poy.11up.uma, 746 -1171, or.appro.. equal. le. APP.fl Vitamin ylant root al.:etor to pent. ploy to Apply ante .leant, to plan. el Me careen, prior to 111. f ttf rj.ted gn'rt.t l■Idtag wet2.4-X ..nrlN x111 •1 of the b waft., parlor Kew to Dentl. q. II. le part correction st1 .rein.• prrLl.s• In all Elm. .s M» establishing ra or0e.11 be ran ear ib.e .r t Ibhing c0ppropr et gr... to sun that •Il ter s1o11 not collect In any pp.Mnt ,it. or plant MM. 17. naltotlone. leatlone. • ... ell m morwad only le contractor Melt provide the owns with • me year ouvont. on ell tore .ills and rtr�nlp. Guerentee shell begin opal final 000710. q u. K lKaln .11 pe.t) ma mil tin.l e•pp ce by Ns Le. It is the Nods.. contractor* responsibility to ...le • O M raring, at the conchal. of Ne one Peer warantN petted, r1N Our owner mew the IMbospe art elect, omit•. 1S. llr corrctlors are not the r11 0.0. rity of tie contractor. Moeler IoM. ant. Ma11 take • p0000utiM t..w'u protect all w°rtred. MIm o.mtro I1so. .e 111 r shell provide t.. with :I hour notln w t. following IrcpKlast t. lion of fine d.. polo, a planting. 7. Plant mt erl•1• 1w.ction. • 71nat in•ertlon- 5 S' -0• St0O. ATMOf EXIS/. SININIIA SALE 10400 dfuC3 lor // 71*... l ion � occur area by .9... er�icee .d. Nos. ramonelblllty to call tn. b and ...dole •astir. TM mot of Tee• la.pctlona rill be the reeponelbility of M• 17. In not any .aetlng Vegetation or now landmos s0ttr lane al•hout . direction of the 00 and/or Owner. .. Se* all architectural, grading, egimering, pit, end Kn4y plena. a ,•N• ..-1111100 droving of tha final Mod. p. 'curt to a. b, upon final pp.... t ttho *ore. I0• .. 11 lunla • required q tor •net• and l ca. M f..7.: ••• r Worn. 21. Innobl1 y toot. root growth barrier the f..torero eommodetls, for ell tans within feet of or paving. Call 0001.111•, M. 461 -6717 for information. i . Looters. Contractor WW1 prwthe client with any and all gprTprlab ••-Kilt• Plan. .information/droving. that 1 06.o•p• and irrigation n worm tan of t. Drojm, for all 11. All part... and beads, Many Is meals. q the City or rM 119, in *0,1.0 this iapr°.ge7rrl .armor, hall be paid for .M q the governing body, and pr7l.ad for by the 1•nder.pe contractor 0*. per /f7 with .a ladetopa erobaset. the Went,. of all .I.tlq PIM.. lt.�rlor to reno7•1 a any. Protect Mrs •. toapcllr. *1114 1st*.q, pent., to reel. and protect. are lobe's. Lynn William Horn & Associates , l�r,me•dMr.. • Kr.r IO06w4t Lae A. LW.. fdn 101 P.O. had moo • TemA th oKrn.Sw6.oesT • 100)931dtM tr. vaccum rrI MA. NO on ATTACHMENT B r e IP as URAM0WS LAhee-se.m URA4. L YI/•MN 047C0ED APPROVED: Dick's To .-- Unclassified Use Permit S. 134th St. & 44th P1. S. • Proposed Future Building ATTACHMENT C Date: July 1' 8, 1989 Subject: Dick's Towing - Epic 11 -89 Conditions of Approval The following are conditions of approval for EPIC- 11 -89: 1) Storage vehicle lot will be coated with an impermeable sealed surface to be approved by the City Engineer. 2) All additional requirements that are deemed necessary by the Department of Ecology concerning sewer and water elements will be fulfilled. Applicant may be required to obtain additional permits from the D.O.E. 3) Applicant agrees to a No Protest Agreement to the formation of a LID for widening and improving S. 134th St. to accommodate a 60' road width and construction of sidewalk and street lighting. WAC 197 -11 -970 • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal DEVELOP SITE AS A TOW TRUCK /VEHICLE STORAGE FACILITY, LOT WILL BE SCREENED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER EXCLUDING ENTRANCES WITH TALL, EVERGREEN TREES. Proponent KEN CHIN /YKC ARCHITCTURE AND PLANNING P.O. BOX 70356, SEATTLE, WA 98107 Location of Proposal, including street address, if any SOUTH AND FAST OF S. 134TH ST AND VACATED 44TH PLACE S.. SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP33, RANGE 4. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -11 -89 (See attached conditions) The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Bouleva Date /� (637 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS YKCArchitecture and Planning P.O. Box 70356 Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 783 -3856 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: May 30, 1989 RECEIVED CITY OF `a UKWILA To: Molly A. Headley, Asst. Planner JUN 1 21989 Dept. of Community Development City of Tukwila WILDMAIDEPE 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Dick's Towing Unclassified Use Permit S. 134th St. & 44th P1. S., Tukwila, WA YKC #89 -107 Please find enclosed: 7 Complete sets of prints for the project. 1 Set of photos for proposed building. 1 Color copy of photos. Remarks: Per your request for Design Review Committee review. I understand that the DRC is scheduled for next Thrusday, 6- 22 -89. Please call me if there are any questions. Via: Hand delievered /0 13 -89 /YKC Signed . Ke' K. Chin, A.I.A. cc: Mr. Melvin "Dick" Dickey (Please call (206) 783 -3856 if the above items were not received.) YKCArchitecture and Planning P.O. Box 70356 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: May 08, 1989 To: Re: Seattle, WA 98107 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dick's Towing Unclassified Use Permit S. 134th St. & 44th Pl. S., Tukwila, WA YKC #89 -107 Please find enclosed: (206) 783 -3856 r,) r'.ni,'n\\i1j?rgl l ; r' 11n ,'.3 f \ 11:'o ! ... ! MAY 8 1989 Grrf PLAN 2 Copies of the following: Unclassified Use Permit Application Form. S.E.P.A. Environmental Checklist. Drawings: Site Plan (A1), Topographic Survey (SU 1), Civil Plans (C1, C2), Landscape Plan (L1). Storm Drainage /Detention Calculations. 1 Each of the following: King County Assessor's Map (K1). Mailing labels of adjacent property owners and their occupants within 300 feet. 8 -1/2 "x11" PMT of the above drawings. Application fee: Check #12581 for $400.00. Remarks: For submittal of application to acquire an Unclassifed Use Permit for a tow truck operations. Please call if there are any questions. Via: Hand delieve - d /05- 08- 89 /YKC Signed cc: Chin, A.I.A. Mr. Melvin "Dick" Dickey (Please call (206) 783 -3856 if the above items were not received.) Control No. �` SIG :i \r,\ \� 41�, Epic File No. Receipt Fee $100.00 ecept No. y N' AY u 1989 1 X1,4 { T- ; ;. . „” ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUNO-- 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: DICK'S TOWING— Unclassified Use Permit 2. Name of applicant:Dick's Towing, Inc. - 2012 S. 146th St. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and Contact person:Burien, WA 98168 Contact: Ken Chin /YKC Architecture and Planning, P.O.Box 70356, Seattle, WA 98107 (206) 783 -3856 4. Date checklist prepared: May 08,1989 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of site to beginning upon issuance of permits, as soon as possible. Future phase yet to be determined. Business operations to begin as soon as possible. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. The construction of a office building under separate permit. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Grading and drainage permit. Electrical permit. Construction permits. SEPA Review approval. Unclassified use permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized 'Here. Proposal to acquire an unclassified use permit for a tow truck operations,. including a strage yard. The site consist of approximately 44,340 S.F. (1,02 Ac.)..A future office building of 1,584 S.F. is planned to be erected as another phase of thi proposal. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Proposal project site is located south and east of the S. 134th St. (132nd St. L_ 'Valley St., per King County Assessor's map) and vacanted 44th Pl. S.. Sec. 15 Township 23, Range 4. Please see attached legal description. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APP,ANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1.7% (except @ drainage swale bank) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Existing surface soils is imported fill of heavy sand. It is known that in this general area, peat sub -soil exists. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 6,000 C.F.(667 C.Yd.) of imported fill will be needed. Fill source unknown. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? After building phase: Approx. 8% builing and new paved parking area. Approx. 10% existing paved private road. Approx. /0% graveled storage yard, impervious rating of 0./5. Approx. 12% landscape improv'mt. or remain natural. Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control plans has been drawn up by a licensed civil engineer. Any portion of the site not improved shall remain in its natural state. Landscaping per.code sahll be provided, helping to control erosion. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Insignificant amounts of dust and construction equip- ment exhaust will be emitted during construction. Upon completions of project, insignificant amounts of vehicular exhaust will be emitted during normal opertions. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Sprinkling of water on the construction site as needed to control dust. Vehicles and equipments used during construction and as part of the tow truck operations shall be maintained in good working order to minimize emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will-be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected by a system of catch basins as designed by a licensed civil engineer. Oil water separators wi e installed as required. Please refer to detailed plan and cal_caulations tor additional information. Storm water will be disposed into new retention pond and existing drainage ditch. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: storm water will be directed on the surface iv a grading as—aesigned by the civil engineer to the drainage sysEem. Areas lanscaped and left in fts r ural safe will controlaer run -off concerns. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing scrub grasses where site is to be improved. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping shall be provided as re- quired per code. Licensed landscape architect has provided a design utilizing p ants suite for the northwest as well as a specific purpose. Over 3,000 S.F. of the site will remain unimprove under this . proposal 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric power for security lighting on the first phase. Future office building will require electric power and may use natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Proposal shall conform to local and state conservation codes. Security lights to be installed shall be energy conservation type, Future office building shall conform to state energy codes_ 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any including exposure and explosion, spil occur as a resul describe. None. environmental health to toxic chemicals, ri 1, or hazardous waste, t of this proposal? hazards, sk of fire that could If so, 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None other than those already existing in the area. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Appropriate safety requladtions governing construction and tow truck operations shall be conformed to. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term noises will be created by construc- tion equipment. Long term noises will be created tow trucks and vehicular traffic under normal business operations. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction shall be limited to normal working hours. Noises created by the tow truck operations will not be significant relative to the adjacent traffic noises created by the freeway. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currentli_used to store utilities contractor's supplies and equipments. Adiacent properties uses are office - warehouse bldg. to the northl vacant site to the west, SR -599 to the east, and construction contracting businesses to the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in the recent past. c. Describe any structures on the site. 6' cyclone fence with black tarp for screening. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? bcistinq fence screen will be replaced. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 14-1. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Less than 15 in the future office building. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None j• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposal shall conform with existig land use, zoning, and building codes. Proper reviews and permits will be acquired for the completion of the project. • • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? First phase of the proposal, only a 8' -0" f nce with 2' -0" barb -wire extensions and 30' light poles are to be erected. Future office_building iss planned to be less than 20' -0" in height. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Screening of the storage yard shall be provided per code, using wood slant cyclone fence. Landscaping shall be provided per code. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Tow truck headlight and yard security lights would occur during the hours of darkness. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None,. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: yard lights will hp rliffuged and directed to minimize glare impact. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is fronted by S. 134th St. (132nd /Valley St.) which leads to Interurban Ave. S. and SR -599. b. Is the site currently served not, what is the approximate transit stop? No urban Ave., within 1/2 by public transit? If distance to the nearest Nearest transit stop is on Inter - /2 mile (peak hour bus only). How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 3 public parking spaces shall be_provided outside the fence. The storage yard has the capacity for approximately 70 vehicles, of which some would be for the occupants of the future building. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. The fence screen with barb -wire extension and security lights would reduce security concerns for the police. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. First phase; electricity water and refuse sece, Office bldg. phase; sanitary sewer, telephone. and possibly natural gas, as well as those proposed for_ the first phase. (See below) C. Signature The above answers are t my knowledge. I unde relying on them to make Signature: Date Submitted: ue and stand is complete to the best of hat the lead agency is Sion. PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. 16.b. Continued... Utilities providing services: Electricity; Puget Power. Telephone; U.S. Natural gas; Washington Natural Gas. Refuse to be determined. Water and Sanitary sewer; Tukwila. All utilities are available to the site. Minor may be required for some utilities to extend to West. service; City of trenching the site. Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APOSANT • E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To acquire an Unclassified Use Permit for a tow truck operations. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Different site at an alternative location in the M -1 and M -2 zoning classification. Same procedures, permits, and approvals will be required. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The preferred course of action is to have the Unclassified Use Permit granted for the proposed location. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Tbw truck operations are allowed in the M -1 zones with an Unclassified Use Permit. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None. -23- TO BE COMPLETED BY APP•ANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) • Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only o • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. Now would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • A. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only • STORM DRAINAGE/DETENTION CALCULATIONS FOR DICK'S TOWING FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON OUR JOB . NO. 3228 MAY 8, 1989 BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 - 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032. (206) 251 -6222 STORM DETENTION CALCULATION •• • •,• •: • :' .:•.- it; • • , . . 1 ;7,1- '•5'I .r.;',. ".,-,-....•,r; :-',1 . . i . • 1 • -1--- - P., r • .-•.•4 • •t ,' *1 . i • I • 1. - .,--. - i "•,t ,- s, i•--- I— .,-- :. 1 ..J.:_..:I....:._'-__t :..4.... , re."-.-4-4.7-..-t-^.-4*■-■$;-...4- • . - ---- -f.. --- --1--- "t- — ",` . 1 ‘ I •• I 1,..,-), , . ,. 1 , ,,i 1----k-4,---. I— 1 i- ov-v..-, ! .Fc4_ 1 ‘,..: col t_. ■ C... I C Lk!..1 Ck A-. cArt • I ; : ,.. i ; : , 0 .• , • . . . . . , . , ..._ ...... ..... _ _ _ • _ S1#i A 0,S Al • : t t e-4,' • . =- o13.6. ; .{ • • : • ;i1 L 4. I ; Ptivejw.,4. &LIZ. e■ .■ -■•■■:',‘2,1;277. 41.7jA■4* Ck. Lek CZ, .e■AVA. 0,053 , I ; I 1 I . • • i . . . . . 1 _;,.._;___—• ' _ ,L......__..1 i. ! ' • I ' t ' ' . : . 7 c 1 1, LI fj30136(0;)÷ 0 6 4 K oienG •):-- 9-;1 7 3e; - (- o-75• )-ao 5' .; 7 , ?: .. ai , )t ! . _L,. _ 1 1 . __,'0• . .-,-1;' " 7.--,.•3_-; -...- ... -- • . i-333 e - —relb\e_ " A 1,333 , a if edi -723( . 7./k & 350 • , . , • .4 3 . ..... . 1 . ; ..----.4........i.,.......-____L--j--- ' . ' • I • . I ; ! 1 1 1.. . : : , i i . i . . . . • . . . - . • •• . di - - t": h-, e = q5O •71--; ..? .c", , , • . ( :_2, 1.._ . ; • ; 12-;' ' ' \ 1 - `. • I. • 1 I : , • • , I i : ' 1 ! T , , • , - -.. •-• •-.. -- 4 -. - --1,..........L--- ../. . • .... - . - i , . ',......-.2:,. --..„ - —..1 . - ---- .-- • 1.-- — ,.• - - -• ___y_ ..1.__I _ ..._+ ,• ......__.: .•;___ _ .__..... t__:__... • ; 1 1•1,:11.;:i'•• 111,4. I i i ; . : t t ,_...,..., _..i__;__..r___4___ .._ I_ I.._._ .._ . i _ 1. . • 1.....! t - .. • , • , : . i _....... 1___I__ .1_. LJ._ , 1____I___ .1. _I i_ . ____.1 . •I a , , II : I • I . .. ' . i i i . 1 i _1 -_- I_ - 1.__ •..1 ..-_-___4_,.. ....1......_ . ___ 4.___•.1._ • ...1_ ..._. •,.._..4__ , i 1 • '----t----r--- 4 , :!-- —r- 1- ; -= ---- I • - -1- - • . I .• ; :! .... 1 1 ; 1 : , : IL i" . r i .,i . .............4i . . I 1.. i .. f i 1 , 1 [ = • _.1' _-.....t .•;.:, ... , ; . .....1,_ : I l• .; -: .I. --.1.L-.1..._...1,_.....,•-•-.41......__;_____„:. 7."----11_-tt7T- 11- • ......,......•_i___•r_ , .7- .7.1.7.• 1 i ', i • ,: : _..„ , I, -1 H i-: - . ' t t • , : .. , ; , , T i 4 •:.1 II _ -... : •‘• ....„• .7.--.T i 1 .•F---: :I.,: .1 1 z • , .... : , 1...;:...24,,, • -“. 7717: i ' —1 + , -1-- • 1- . 1.• . t :• •• ; - 1-, if *4. ..- i ,...1 ..-„ :i, ..,.. I I • ,-,, , 1.:1;.;..,-,(:: _ I .. . I , ', I - . I . i ...i...L..... .., .L - i _±__Lj_,;:.±....-,:- 11• .:. ,_ ..t. ::. . 1,..,,,,-_,_ - _ . . :...-:,:,;,-. ..,..,,,,,;;;..! ::.-_,_,....,_, . :...,-J.,-."--..,...,7:4 --- •t- , - - • exs tytsy ,: Hetti'od ['o et•ermine:.5torage' aquireinenta and Release Rate e'Yrjanainen.' and. Warren `Method l:is:. the ::method used to determine l 4 :•� orage ;volume req'uirem'ents, „for storm water detention facilities This „'method has been used to develop Table A from which the storage volume 'required will be determined. alculating. Storage ,Volum Definition of Terms ' C1 Cp A =AI Average coefficient of runoff for the development. 0.9, Coefficient of runoff for impervious surfaces. 0.2, Coefficient of runoff for pervious surfaces. Volume of storage required per acre, in cubic -feet. VT = Total storage volume required, in cubic feet. Procedures l)' Determine A, AI and Ap 2) Calculate C by using the formula (Cp) (A.p) + (CI) (AI) C ■ A 3) 'Determine V by. entering Table A with the value of C, the type of outlet control selected, and the storm intensity selected. 4) Calculate VT .by using the formula, VT = V'x A 1Yrjanninen, Clan and Warren, Alan W. '' e W., A Simple Method. For Retention Basin Design ", Water and Sewage Works, December 1973, pp. 40 — 42. • Revised 11119/7.9 TABLE A • Note: :Standard requirement is 10 -year storm design; 25 -year storm is preferred for us'e in sump areas and for pumped systems. `V s-volume of storage re uired per acre (ft)) 10 year storm 25-year storm .,. .orifice outlet : control pumped . discharge orifice outlet control pumped::' discharge • ,. 0: 2 "` 92 41 144 • 78. -0:25; • .154 85 228 • 142 0.3 •' 223 138 320 216 0.35 298 199 418 • 298 0.4 378 265 522 387• 0.45 461 335 627 480 0.5 548 409 740 578 0.55 637 487 . 854 679 0.6 729 _ 567 971 - 783 0.65 822 650' 1089 890 0.7 ..0..-714, 917 735 1214, 999 0.75 1014 822 • 1333) 1111 0.8 /113_ 911 -1457 1224 0.85 1212 1001 1582 1339 '0.90 1313 1093. 1709 1456 • Note: :Standard requirement is 10 -year storm design; 25 -year storm is preferred for us'e in sump areas and for pumped systems. TABLE RUNOFF FACTORS FOR STORM SEWERS FI.Al 0 - -50 :UNDEVELOPED' LAND ROLLING >5% Wood F, Forest 0.05 • - O. l0 Sparse Trees 6 Ground Cover 0.10 0.15 Light Grass to Bare Ground. 0.15 11.20 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement F, Roofs 0.90 0.90 Gravel Roads ( Parking Lots 0.75 0.80 City Business 0.85 0.9(I Apartment Dwelling Areas 0.80 11.85 Industrial Areas (Heavy): 0.711 (1.80 Industrial Areas (Light) 0.61) . 0.70 Earth Shoulder 0.51) 0.50 Playground 0.25 0.30 Lawns,. Meadows. t; Pastures 0.20 0.25 Parks & Cemetery . . ... 0.15 .0.20 SINGL.E ,FAMILY RF:SII)ENTIAL (Dwelling Unit /Gross Acre), 1.0 -1.5 DU /GA 0.30 1.5 -3.0 DU /GA .0.35 3.0 -3.5 DU /GA 0.40 3.5 -4.0 DU /GA 0.45. 4.0 -6.0 DU /GA 0.50. 6.0 -9.0 DU /GA 0.60 9.0 -15.0 DU /GA . 0.70 ORIFICE SIZING • • «< oao NNN N/12 rrr NNN• 000 000 NPR m .9^i 0:62 (64.4) (Z-•S) The total area of drainage control, in acres. Allowable 'runoff from site, in cubic feet per second. Cross—sectional area of orifice, in square inches. Orifice diameter, in inches. g 32.2 ft/sec/sec, acceleration of gravity. h Pressure head on orifice, in feet. 0.62, constant for sharp—edged orifice. Procedure 1) Calculate QA using the formula, QA = 0.2 x A 2) Determine h 3) Calculate a using the formula, 144 QA a = (in square inches) 0.62 Fill; - ;4) Calculate d using the formula, d \I 4a rr (in' inches) PIPE SIZING ANALYSIS CATION, INCREMENTAL. AREA RUN - OFF COEFFIC,. C AC 1 AC TIMEAF CON - CENTRATION TC RAINFALL INTENSITY I RUN -OFF 0 (1 AC 1) PIPE DIA. SLOPE FHOM ACRES MINUTES INCHES /HR, C.F. S INCHES VELOCITY AT DESIGN 0 -ENGTH FLOW TIME IN SYSTEM UPPER ELEvATION F. P. S. FEET MIN GROUND 0,0' 6.5310.04 to 6 0.07 t. g- 65 :a.6 LOWER ECEvAriOij INVERT GI -20UND INVE' T ; o, g5 c r= s = a.s4 :eFs.': 1;0 Cdr I, 35 :1 :C f; ►,35 c RJ:' Ca ea. Gj31( Gt 0,04 o.GO 0,04 fJ 0;33 C123_ ask 000 0,41 ID. 6 1.58 0.13 0,7g \, q. /oo 0.88 11.94 .55 0.64 8 0, 54 '3 1 Q0 2,So ►•54 o.6 3 ),o 4' Z 0,09 12.58 I, r4 0,63 9 �t•Z 5-. 0o Z • USWt3. CItAHT NO � 4�^a -ar/ C \e-. TORN F.REOUENCY: (0 /10 ,PIPE COEFFICIENT : a 01 --L ----FCTC-7-3: jai NAME CF PROJECT J / CALCULATIONS BY: REMARKS: J00 NO. 3Z 7-- 13 DATE s- 8` 81 SHEET 1 (1F I SHEETS Icx o. S. 134TH ST. w O 35' B LOT B BLOCK 3 LOT 12 LOT 13 LOT 14 ' LOT /5 WY N 4744'57 E 546.511 ,•>• Pr101. rood (asphalt) ,...+ (Xocol•d Rath 31.1 elan> ant, Iv 35' T 10 ,•n LOT 9 Tr 0 LOT 8 • BLOCK 4 CB fULL Of RAYEil LOT 7 •al 5vn ,a.n 5 4744'57 W 265.71 LOT 0 LOT 12 LOT' 13 LOT 14 ,..n • —• —. .•1a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT! 6.713 YO E. BLOCK 4. ALL W RIVERTOR REPEAT 0' 1.0131105 FO3TORM GARDEN TRACTS. ACCOIOM0 TO u TIE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED W VO.WE D OF RATS. PARE 40. RECORD! OF 1010 CORBY. WAT0101RA EXCEPT THAT PORTION TIEIEOF CONDEMNED FOR STATE NORWAY BY COUNTY OF RED. CITY OF SEATTLE UNDER Ru0 COUNTY ALOITORS FLE 1AOWA 60231 .s•1 THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASIMOTOI FOR !TATE NORWAY. BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'! RE NUMBERS ST9535 ANp 5733707: TOOETIER WTI THAT PORTION OF VACATED STREET MIMEO THAT ATTACHED BY OPERATION OF LAW. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR DICK'S TOWING INC. a LOT 6 44;4) s.• LOT 15 4, P• 20' BEARINGS - K.C.A.S. VERTICAL DATUM - CITY OF TUKWILA M.S.L. MOM LUNY B ASSOCIATES 2220 S. 287TH ST. FEDERAL WAY. WA. 98003 206 839 -7755 RECEIVED APRL 24.1989 JOB N0. 2589 APR 2 5 989 YKC 2 0 2 0 8 a a $6 H M 03 0_ W 4 woo DRA'MNCS: TOPO. SURVEY DRAW : YKC CHECKED: APPROVED 1 1 si 1 L_1 0; GRADING & TEMPORARY EROSION / SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN CALL FLIALUL AT. OA.. MT.. - - € ,a,r■ N 41.44'57. 388.38' 1 0,--"so" P/L TT. I BLDG. PAD EL.. 14.5 TEMPORARY EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: m".nun.ar"ei .w...r ruau a n. nm un o.su.m wu". DICK'S TOWING FACILITY • .31,• - CONSTRUCT MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC • FENCE PER DETAL TH.S SHEET % CONSTRUCT TEMPORAPY 'V' DITCH -0 PER DETAL THIS SHEET g4. 9 EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAL TNS SHEET P L / S 41•44'57" W 289.71' CONSTRUCT TEMPORAI T' V. DITCH PER DETAL THIS SHEET FABRIC FENCE FENCE PER DETAL THIS SHEET I CD. F VICINITY MAP-_ •T Lwem a • ELEVATION o- * °M ulLrrsg'ZI LE CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE: rpm.. 0.sincTION VreSTRUCT OL.T4=1. KM 1 OUTLET CONTROL STRICTURE KA ROC. ® w �NAXXN.«T -..A. E �lll1[ [E,II SITL..-;s�' E EMIR 11 !ICI.: mei mini: EV 1'I LEGEND: CONSTRUCTS. ENTRANCE �..r TEMPORARY FLTER FABRIC FENCE - -... -� OUSTING MANAGE DITCH - -0-- EXISTING SAMTARY SEWER EYSTMG WATER EXISTNG pETORM MANAGE FLOW �Ap EXLSTNG spot ELEVATI. EXISTING FENCE TEMPORARY "V" DITCH NTS TYPICAL CROSS SECTION TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NTS SILT FENCE DETAIL N TS FLIP GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE PLAN 399 N 41'44'57" E 388.38' P/L BLDG. PAD N. if . cw .I On FF.15.30 .=' CO C.O. i, i EI.A FREEBOARD wsw SECTION'A -A' - DETENTION POND NO SCALE L.1 S 41'44'57" W 289.71' 4. MN. COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK GRAVEL STORAGE YARD SECTION P y0 LEGEND /1ST. STORm DRAINAGE °POP.. ASPHALT ,•IST. SPOT ELEVATION RPDROSEO SPOT ELEVATION vmOROSED CONTOURS �EPfNWW bx •. !eR TgwSD w"' TYPICAL PAVING SECTION - F1ANeBLE .I TIUDED_GONCRETE CURB DETAIL FLOW RESTRICTOR /OIL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE MANHOLE STORM DRAINAGE NOTES LEGAL DESCRIPTION 156.7.8.9 A.10 BLOC,a d WVEG 1p. REPLF' OP • TO 5 COS T OR!A 0000(0ATPA( TS, 0CCOPD WG T4 CAPOEN THE PLAT THEREOF ''50 0 0 vOLUME , OF PLATS PAGE AD.RECORD50C FNO COUNTC WASHN0 TON EXCEPT THAI PORTION THEREOF CONDEMNED FOP STATE • A, B, CWNT0 OF FIS. 0208 SEATTLE ONDEP 800 COUNT I 0000T0R5 FILE NUMBS 618785 07 THAT ORTION 001 OF CONVE rED TO Pt STATE OF WA9NOTON COP 5'n TE - H. BF DEED RE CORDED GNU P AUDIT OR S PlE P.M PS 57.S 85 AND 5758787 TOOL THEP WITH THAT P4777.• 4F v., TED STREET AU+OWWO T74{1 7 ATTACHED B• OPER ION O F LAW. VICINITY MAP C« O so C „ �M1= CWT; OP cn vs 7 Cal Io�;7 • .F I O "2 „ OS 3 CO N 3CO