The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-115-79 - UNIFIR / SOLLY DEVELOPEMNT - 2 BUILDINGSUNIFER EPIG115 -79 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 411111116/FINAL DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICAJCE Description of proposal Construction of two office buildings with site improvements Proponent Unifir Co., Bruce Solly Location of Proposal 52nd Avenue, North of Southcenter Boulevard Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 115 -79 This proposal has been determined to 011111/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS Iris not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Date Director, Office of Community Development COMMENTS: Signature Public storm drainage facilities to serve run -off from the subject site shall be improved as needed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. ;190B; City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar Q Bauch, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Kjell Stoknes, O.C.D. Director FROM: Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner DATE: 25 September 1979 SUBJECT: SEPA Review of the Unifir Project The applicants have filed building permit drawings for this project, having received City Council approval of a Final Waiver of the require- ments of Ordinance #1109. Comments have been asked of, and received from, other reviewing depart- ments of the City. Public Works notes that the project will contribute to peak storm run -off conditions in the area. Conditions imposed on the Final Waiver require the applicant to file written agreement to partici- pate in L.I.D. improvements on 52nd Avenue, including storm drainage facilities. I believe that all pertinent environmental concerns affecting this pro- ject have been resolved already, and that a Declaration of Non- Signifi- cance can be issued allowing us to release the building permits. For the record, though, you may wish to condition the Declaration of Non - Significance as follows: "Public storm drainage facilities to serve run -off from (3) the subject site shall be improved as needed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works." MC /ckh TO 1 Phil Fraser, Office Engineer Public Works Department SUBJECT: "UNIFIR" ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 J DATE 11 September 1979 MI iPD Please review and return comments to O.C.D. within 7 working days. Q D '�"; SIGNED Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner * No W 1 U . A DO 7 '7 Nom' K.. 7p2t4-1 b)11) 1.4 r < t f1 - ' 1 r 1 i..k.or S, 1 $►\ — 17 I! P f p l DATE: SIGNED P CASCADE® L1 -C2374 PRINTED IN U S A TO r- Chief Crawley, Fire Department__ Lt: 0.C.D. CITY OF 11411/11A SEP 25 184 Please review and return comments to O.C.D. within 7 wnrking days. RETURN TO 0 ISIGNED Mark Caughpy, Assistant Planner WO" Ct1 iL 11101112■."- DATE: - • ETICEIIVD CITY OF TUKWIL• O•T•0• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CITY of TUKWILA This 1lestionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for. permit P Thiequalionnaire must be completed by all persons, applying for a permit from the 7`iy of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Respohsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: uil/ ig C.. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: /'0. /96x A561/5 -t't>j�CW iL�t WA. . 98 /c6e) 415 - 4826 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: /30 /404Ji p6 7 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: $p077/66 5r,AQ AgOlk56 R4 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will aive an. accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 7lil0 Off/L6 glatorNAlals 4fi APp,Ro'. ID,Azi si /9 D S F ev7 Ohl sit& j 11J4 /96D11/0650 2 M4' ,f3L.�E'��. i�r /S Sl�it4� 9 /�(J 57111. 0 S2..1 dite.41 A444 7 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): StOrw TiAr _w7 -t,w,S 9,t s 4.44d Alla k , ey 7,0-u -vie r -0C1/7404:9-04. Si 4 w.LG A!7€rre q load;r 1, . si.4 sLoP.e et.Teats tin ice' Ste- gal, 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 14044. /980 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES N0.2<._ (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO ')( (e) Sewer hook up permit YES )r NO (f) Sign permit YES XC NO (g) Water hook up permit YES )( NO (h) Storm water system permit YES )C NO (i) Curb cut. permit YES k NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES ) NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NppD 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- , posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all " s" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface tures? (d) in geologic or overcover- relief fea- The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features ?. -9- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in .deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 614-4s) Dee 74O R660e4PA A sity 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • a.) bosr 4o/e/A.14 Lons>i't'ior, , )00#04.261., isee;e4e1 £/7 # Ault) *. 770-06,e , f Dv,¢nc/ar s7< lore 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? 1C (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? �L (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: tb) 0,So"eti®hJ 4i ./c J Sy 4Lo PA V /ik , Q J Pa y sfeJc,M vys/e, .. P) nett 71000 9) Sa Cia) YES MAYBE NO x_ 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ai (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? %r (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: G) pc 5S /4947 A/ 0.4.t.) Speele t /&l L4Albsce ',& , 5. Fauna...Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an ... area, or result in a barrier to the migration — 'or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: a). /ChM/A WU. /?l rsmeye O!2 Fenetto ot# ca 58e Cad -4- 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: PVC/26b:6D 7472A /91e-/C "to 4e off Sj, 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: DIGc/ GE L!9 yi►ANI?j ,� . ✓'!s /d 1-6 A T #/4111-1" ,E)► t84/ olc Zdoi s 0m ,ve,v - 14, 1yp* . 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous ' substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Exp'lahation: - 5- YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? sG /q /nrp 7— pve 74a LOG9wc Avec6 OF 1116 7wo a,, ' 1 S , 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: NGW /3vs/ ss w /l.L ,P )/ A &Hip/ogees G, /'ie,4f «viLc fe.cJ # 4 / n 4 , . S o m a wi4t h-c Aa1 A tart c / .,,.1 i1ee! 4et i.t, 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Generation of additional vehicular movement? Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? Impact upon existing transportation systems? Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: a) Aby' £mp /e /eeg ,te,.P Vi$IAP AS 4) orJ s At mel a 9444 c oleo fie. /4 /fie ze 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? LIri &ya.dy e,,4 (b. -Police protection? ,4o',rze-1 ,mss (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? • -6- • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO ') /x New f8t rwe 144 n O lc ii „so A/2.64 1 1/L4. jo'bs 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the, proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signat nd Title 24A)e mael /ev .Z cz/Ad /3o zady-th26 se4 fa 4),145i Q46A)13 Opd"i /. ' Go. -8- Otri: Date X 1 10. I •eso-r/5-4 -4 1 c,4-- L•-• •••••• .,- i .1 F ....• •f- c4,:-:"-- ..•••:'; . " ;,•-•:-.,-. '..7.7 6" <II., 4." r 4 (.1.6,`F4- -` - ':-P b 7 0 , 1.• 12 •■: '-)...-- I:...i f? .' .r-1 • : Ae-eFe- .....41Z..: it i.s.ri..4!--1 FF04 Hi/ 4 S,-18.1■■•-'-ra% L.-1,, s- \ CC--•:--;"• ' 1-!•PI,1,..C.,r., .-- ,"- P■It,, -47 II' - II -p 1.1 vs. I ?... MI 1'..-1,j C.Ori r...47-7. , I ! rk144.-.A.. OMC.441-/... F1-f..11... Kb ••• "!..t':•-:". •••••eir•-■ f •3,4-,•!1...-e. .7 ,-.J.40••• t pr,..4 ...: r-944. 'W-0-1.,"-14 P-e.4:, ._.e..1.....r;.. e■ t. , I" ;NI ■EL 11:1 i. r r/ if. • -,..!--Z. f.. ••'''.- io' '10 1:' .."?'' A -I* . . - • . 50 le, ' (06 74. ' . 26 2-2.... 147 Sa i -t T-- Fr?,4-, :".., I 4 , meow-KA-4 -mist..., . vi 15t.4124 .1.A.,! --... PI-C,E.12r.-v-$i...1 -■ ' c p: AP-Olriu:, uriF....1...12 x 1,-t-rt-4-71F4 IL.. L-E. .--f- F.,, 4.4 e- tni"-,M15. I., if,.....• 4,0' V21-11-1'-'14., 1- •'-'1-1°-•:1,--01.1-1-" -.-4 ...7., rt.:: 1..1, fk...?: c. ..4-it-ti PL-•.'. P'1C)-inTIILIIP. ,...t.A.ut...-.1.. nt .,....s . L-, ' .-... -..leti .....-ti -4 ..,-.:.f -11-16- se.. 1.412-T • ,--r42.4.:,.. ■■•=1" I , 1:-.* Fz7V-‘,--T il tv-- .14"-1i-ti.: 4;', 1 r:: '