HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-116-79 - GAZECKI TYLER - LOG HOMEGAZECKI SHORELINE
EPIC- 116 -79
•
OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED /FINAL
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
Proponent
Location of Proposal
Lead Agency
Construct log home display area
Tyler G. Gazecki
S/E quadrant, Southcenter Blvd. @ Interurban Ave.
City of Tukwila
File No EPIC - 116 -79
This proposal has been determined to (- /not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (i-sfis not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Mark Caughey
Position /Title
Date 2 April 80 Signature
Acting Planning Director ,/
COMMENTS:
CONDITIONS PERTINENT TO FINAL DECLARATION:
A. A 40' riverfront easement be dedicated to the City with provisions
to allow for construction of appropriate recreation facilities.
B. Sidewalks to be provided on Southcenter Blvd. street frontages with
crosswalks provided for pedestrian access, as required by Public Works
Department.
C. Sufficient lighting at sight to provide for proper police patrol.
D. State Flood Control Zone permit required.
E. Landscaping required to moderate increased runoff due to construction
activities.
F. Application for sign permit to be made separately from building permit
application.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW:
DISPLAY AND MARKETING FACILITY /ROCKY
MOUNTAIN LOG HOMES
I. INTRODUCTION:
An environmental checklist has been received by the Planning Division in
conjunction with an application for a shoreline permit to allow construction
of a display and, marketing facility for pre -cut log houses. Tyler G. Gazecki,
consultant to the lessee, has filed the application.
The shoreline site proposed for the construction project is located on the
southeast corner of Southcenter Boulevard and Interurban Avenue, with the
Green River running along the south property line. The site is currently
vacant, covered with weed grasses, blackberry bushes, and various flowering
weeds; no substantial trees grow on the site. The soil is firm and does
not appear to be marshy at any point. On a brief visit to the site, no
birds or wildlife were observed.
II. REVIEW OF PROPOSAL:
A. Zoning
1. The project site is currently zoned M -1, light industrial.
2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site to be a "Commercial"
use area.
B. Site Plan
1. Plans submitted with the environmental checklist indicate that the
log structure is to be placed at the rear (approximately south)
of the property.
2. Paved parking is to be provided for five cars.
3. Access to the site will be off of Southcenter Boulevard.
4. A six foot wide walkway leads from the parking area to the building.
5. The structure is to be two stories.
a. Building height will be about twenty -two feet above grade.
b. Total floor area is to be approximately 1,400 square feet.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The environmental checklist and an accompanying review form have been circu-
lated to all concerned city departments for review and comments. The proposal
appears upon initial review to pose little risk to the environment. However,
there are several points that should be taken into consideration with regard
to this project.
•
A. Current Land Use
1. Current and proposed city zoning allow commercial uses of the nature
of this proposal.
a. At present no commercial structures are located in the vicinity
of the proposal site; this building will be pioneering the
immediate area as a regionally significant commercial locale.
2. Surrounding lands are now vacant, and access to the Regional Fort
Dent County Park is via the extension of Southcenter Boulevard
bording the project site on the north.
a. This section of road is lightly used at this time, mainly
for access to the county park.
b. A bicycle lane runs along the north side of the road to the
park, encouraging non - motorized transportation in the area.
1) Completion of Christensen Greenbelt Phase III, the I -405
Pedestrian /Bicycle Overpass, along with 1980 improvements
to Southcenter Boulevard, will connect Fort Dent Park
to the Greenbelt Park, providing a linear recreation
link through this section of Tukwila.
c. The proposed commercial facility, drawing automobile traffic
from throughout the region, would be incompatible with the
non - motorized circulation now developing in the area.
3. The proposed land use, though in compliance with City zoning
requirements, in the opinion of staff does not meet the intent of
the Comprehensive Plan regarding commercial development along the
Interurban Corridor.
a. The proposal is of a regional commercial character; the Inter-
urban Corridor is intended to be developed as a commercial
center with local orientation, encouraging non - motorized
modes of transportation in the area.
B. Shoreline Management Act
1. It is the specific intent of the State Shoreline Management Act
(WAC 173 -16 -060) to limit new commercial development to shoreline
areas where commercial development is already located.
2. New commercial development along shorelines is to be limited further
to water - dependent activities.
3. In both of the above instances, the log house facility does not
comply with State guidelines.
2
•
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS:
If a negative declaration is granted for the subject proposal, staff recommends
that specific conditions be attached to any subsequent development permits
applied for as follows:
A. A 40' riverfront easement be dedicated to the City with provisions to
allow for construction of appropriate recreation facilities.
B. Board of Architectural Review of all development plans prior to issuance
of building permit.
C. Sidewalks to be provided on both street frontages; crosswalks provided
for pedestrian access.
D. Vehicular access allowed off Southcenter Boulevard only, as close as
possible to east property line of the project site.
E. Sufficient lighting at sight to provide for proper police patrol.
F. King County Hydraulics permit required.
G. Landscaping required with a reasonable time limit for completion to
moderate increased runoff due to construction activities.
H. Application for sign permit to be made separately from building permit
application.
3
Tyler C.Ga zeclti
Building Designer
3215 NW. 60th Street
Seattle, Washin on- 98107
(206) 784 -8546
August 7, 1979
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
Tukwila, Washington
To Whom It May Concern:
The following statements are part of the information request-
ed in the City of Tukwila's Environmental Checklist Form (Sepa).
This form has been completed and submitted by the firm of
GAZECKI DESIGN, who has been contracted by Mssrs. David Stewart
and James Stewart of 2440 South 146th, Seattle, Washington, to
represent them in the acquistion of all necessary permits for
the project in question.
Please forward any requests for additional information regard-
ing this project to us. Thank you.
GAZECKI DESIGN
TG /sf
Enclosures
II CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTION AIRS REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: evAZtGK1 - SN01ZELINE Pt-iZMJT
PROJECT ADDRESS: NA 4412 • sp. GNliz. ELvu °' 1I.I1SiZtA'S'•14 AVE
• DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: to seer 797 — PLsAsE Renick) co fructeNrs TT) o•c.D
g-( MOiJDA.`fi OOT $ 19i9
(reviewer)
•
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
wilding: o� /777 by: C
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
El Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
•
• CITY OF TUKWILA
•-
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: GAZCGK
PROJECT ADDRESS: N /t. 44e
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: Zo
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
- 51.441,1ZELi N E Pe-MAU T
, 50. GNirt• ISLVV @ u t s .w AVE
seer 7 - PI.�a.sE RE1U J co MJtE.Nrs TD
g•( MoJDA (J GGT. 1, .1979
(date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
Engineering: (0(10(7? PAL cMr.Ts -n, by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑.Police: by:
P1 ' IC WORKS DEPT.
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: CITY OFTUKWItq
i) SIDE-WALKS Rio ou 1SCM • RZoNTA6
y) Access . c;:01 GNTR.. As cLO 4-5 p& SEP .
2 4 1979
410410 CITY OF TUKWILA ••
ENVIRONMENTAL OUESTIO NAIRE. REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: 6.4.2t;GK - 544ogEt.i MalkiT
R t vv I N i%fttflZ W
PROJECT ADDRESS: NA Gv�• Sv•4N1ti'1• �
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 2cp SEPT. 79 — pt,6AsE RENLN co kkietENrs TV 0•G•9
gam{ MouDX11 oGT. ►� .1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW:
❑ Building:. by:
❑ •Engineering: by:
Fire: q /I9 by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑.Police: by:
(date) (reviewer)
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
•
• CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
NAME: NAME: G&Zt .K) - 5N424ZELINE MIZAUT
PROJECT ADDRESS: N/t e-cAz• 5v•4NTz• rtvu C? (MISZUR' A.w AVE
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 2.40 strr 79 - PauAsE ftENLN coiwitENr's To o•G•P
g`{ NkOIJDA:1 OGT. �/ .1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineerin'g: .by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
Li" Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Question a - Light and Glare — Because of the isolated location of this structure
and the present absence of immediate adjacent buildings, sufficient
lighting should be provided,during the hours of darkness,to provide
a good field of vision to Police Units on Patrol on both Southcenter
Blvd. and on Interurban Ave.
Question #14B
entry and exit to park facilities by pedestrians.
— Construction on this site will effect police services in that it
will add to the traffic at the immediate site as well as in the
intersection at Southcenter Blvd. and Interurban Ave. Additionally
it will require the expansion of the present patrol sector to include
this additional site and a physical check of the building during the
hours of darkness.
•Question #13F — Sidewalk and cross walk facilities to permit unrestricted and saf e
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must beconpleted and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent:
Tyler G. Gazecki
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1421 North 34th Street
784 -8546 (home) 4' 2O9fi(work) Seattle, Washington
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist:
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
August 7, 1979
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Please see attached letter
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Please see attached letter
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 2/80
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YESX NO
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YESX NO
(c) Building permit YESX NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NOX
(e) Sewer hook up permit YESX NO
(f) Sign permit YESX NO
(g) Water hook up permit YESX NO
(h) Storm water system permit YESX NO
(i) Curb cut permit YESX NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YESX NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESX NO
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed'at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:,
None
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
X
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? _X_.
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen'or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result-in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to'the migration
or movement of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? X
Explanation:
.YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? X
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? X
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal . result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
X
X
YES MAYBE .N0
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution,. density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
X
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing ?. X
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
Explanation:
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? X
(b) Police protection? X
(c) Schools? X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including X
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal .result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon. existing sources of energy., or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
-7-
X
1 •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or.his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the ,best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Signature and Title Date
X
X
X
I. 6. Nature and Brief Description of Proposal
Objective: The objective of making this improvement on
the site mentioned is to provide a suitable location for
the display and marketing of a pre -cut log home building
product. The product is virtually a replica of the log
cabins originally built by settlers in this area. All
materials used -- roofing, siding (logs), railing, paned
windows, etc., consist of natural materials. The majority
of the log home buyers will be building in rural, natural
settings, and therefore, it is of great importance that
the display also be sited in a natural setting. For this
reason, great care is being taken to insure that the pro-
posed improvements for this site will be done in a fashion
that will have minimum impact on the existing natural set-
ting.
Size: The scale of the proposed project is quite modest
compared to what the zoning will permit in this area.
(Please see accompanying drawings for specific description
of the improvements).
7. Location of Proposal
The proposed project is located at the east corner off
the Southcenter Boulevard, Interurban Avenue intersection.
The physical setting is as follows:
The site is bordered at the northwest by Southcenter
Boulevard.
The Green River and its adjacent Rip Rap Bank /Easement
forms the southeast border. The southwest property line,
running parallel to Interurban Avenue, is adjacent to a
45' wide access strip, adjacent to Interurban Avenue.
The site is covered with wild grass, thistles, blackberry
vines, etc.. There are no trees or shrubs currently on
the property, the site has the appearance of being basically
flat with a slight grade sloping towards the river.
The land affected is only that within the property line.
The grading of the site will change only to provide ade-
quate drainage for the parking area and appropriate siting
for the log cabin foundation (see accompanying drawings
for details). The landscaping of the property will be im-
proved to include the plantings and surfacing indicated on
the attached drawings.
II.1.(c) Very slight changes in existing grading will be made to
accommodate parking area, landscape, foundation, etc..
3.(b) The drainage pattern may vary slightly with the addition
of the paved parking area.
4.(a) A change in both the diversity and numbers of species of
flora can be anticipated because of the addition of several
trees and shrubs included in the landscaping plan.
13.(a) Because of the proposed use of the site, a few additional
vehicles may use nearby . roadways to visit the log cabin
display.
(b) New parking will be provided on the site.
1 r
17'• 0 211 -On &-o• J�
0
14' -4
•
t
F7av�� -l� 1T
C« 0=T Pry
1r:.3'- G'
I 34'
13�
UTIL
SI M.
M1 - Ot-. NNmE
CWT T:
SIZE
�, � C� -<
�,.
1YJ11!�1.Af- FIPS
2. e
io'
1k 0
Co'
RuoDEDF.1-11?eoN
!o e
z•{'
3 E
4b'
5L.13fiK -TW PE-F4.
4 V'
et,'
'ummFK K5D n ,E
30
b'
HoRwAY ••!n
o
4'
t4CTfU
4-W44 wA JZ rvxK
6:14 E 3-1 RIE =ZO.S'
AT THIS 5I-TU.
NC4'1T+
r iGC I.- -G , ,•SPLAY C ITS
3u1,< r • 1 c:2
T c KY t" 1G1J4JT1 11X- -, HOMES
is:-.4,v131 J'M f,--; s• r C ClcTf,e,14•Ci' •
IT-6- 1-G4'..6.C'N:
C-,-cx of II4c 3r-e.M+i•:jr.,•19 .ELVt .
Di. fl :'.7AIKJJ,'j"%7
S.41-6: Vd' - 1' -0"
GIAZEGKt t.:,51.:-.AY,N - Co4 -2031
1421 1.1.34x' ..q.17 °_ EATT1 -E - -X,103
eat.:1-:-.71._=- .rt Nor:-.; :.1_ 'L.P.'S. 'N 17.1
1eoz -K-1 HrAGF,C1 1>1'73Z
v9.1_ • rszta
cvact--+ .30' :-.1•9•55
EL .11)Vv,9 : :al-V-3
•1-7,6*.n 'V finA>in1
'9::tecT2 f-ill-n-,•,:n- .F.-tva...41.411.Nt 11&77
:Hal.l.trjc71 a.1-I
.
24.,
'Pe've4L 1.-11.1.-vE ..Cu wir l'etCs
S•WOH 1571 NIVIN410.--1 -1-.)4V7
------T5 °7- --bte-737—"5-AaErN.
NicAle3c-r1
1-2arceid
c=N/1-1 ,1,111-4171A
.zi
• 51• t..P■Z P-41 J -iai
I I I
I- • • • --
xcr2
atricilH5. NIct ca. I -
•■•ints0,4g. •
cto21‘-.9
_Lrr, '.U1 H9Irt
,L4-41r4r1 51
r‘nal c1V-4oz Ni3.td
ce3dcr *..3Nve Ur.atk
...1:-L11,tarai)xy7 41 IN'/
nal-49z .91-tL c21_ c23fl
cit.a14zgOA "TritsrAitttaa --nyws Y 1514
t.r."0.4 -114/1.4* dc' 99X3 -Kum
9.s4LL iL lY ca9A0Ich-iitIrt .1 11 •.esn —rdt:41_,-;oot-41
-LHsri cr-Bricra- I R.L.ncs wtL aL cv--(Nr1 9411 .4-■140,:x
MOO
->u\rj LLr pct LION I
•
ENo
--
cci-rwurc
INDKAI' W -�x"1� GoNTGUR
fa Klt-
SSLTON TNFzOUC 5ri'=
CAelN a,4P -''7
_._ _MODEL 1-10M5 orDrpLAT SITE
?OcKY 1"4GUNTAIN L05 NCMS5
-- bwE t JIM 'T\VAPST ,t+TRE, \V-.
- 4-.t
6G 3Z OF IMi3=UP?i'k -446a.711-
.l» /ILA,\Y.°6HII cTUN.
L?.-,4L5 .
g4js:sLr 1-1517D
fe.4 1-6 f hJ rio -rti7
DRN, -r a.
,A-7_-5C -KI .CESItN
1421 N. 3470-T - EATI -L-E, 9tJ03
6;34- 20
1
*.
Tr
•••••.. r_ -
•
- seE,1C.C12 !
IL
-
•
e.
,
• ?!!!
•
•
••I; -i".
t_11
"3
GTO..
•
„ ••••,-‘ __I---,-ij
Lc..I.TE t.3 I .;
, **--
•••••11
sLis a;
-
tr .
; -6
tO
7Iev, sc 4- ..71,1!%7S
•-• - -t - ,
•
"..e-p•-••■[- !
•-.1-••=1.: •
• I
.7' 4
-••
•••■-••• ; C;3
t4
1
!i!
!!! —
-. 1
!!!
'11
i!!
0 • -• —
•
, •
:!.
•■■•4 4 .-/c•i!!
4, ,17E.R.•-•
N•1 - • !
f.
z 4
L.
ir •
40- ro
•
t Z
• ii; .1,171
111
•
-V •
__r
--4
• (1?!- LT
- - - 7,.7.7-. --, ,..,..... 7.- ,_.__=--...=--;1'.---- -.-- - - ---?
- III . .1 :Ili- 1 11 r t; - -..----i
11. -1 ' •• ' . ".1111. i'.'
11r.- 1 11
-i- • 11 4.., 4 .1 .•' - 1
-H ';'C...'''' -4
I:, 1;;.2-1
I--j-- 111 11 I ',----- ,
i t ' I-1 r.1 11:---------=
F-- I_ It
r--.. ___:_____
■---,
HrL
•
- • . • • ■ • - - •
- •
EFT _ ;
- -•
_ __ ______
...... . .... _
..,........._.,7_,_
-_-__-,-,...--,-_--- -
--=-- ---,=.---.=:_::-:-.-_:_-_-.., _-
----------7-.-------------___-_,,....---2- —• •
::&,...-_-.., .-- -e s
....- ..., ,-.,. ... -,
—
.>. .....4 L.-....,...C1Z
_. .
, 1 '
- ..
•
- - - - - -
.7.:]_
........._.„_,-,tr....--,.=,-. .......---
L.
-s-....---.....-----....—_,........e...._..-..-
__-.t.../ 1-7-.---1.'j."- fl- ..... , __,.. _____,....„__ _...,.
-,,_.=
--i 4—
1 t... i • ,____ •:. • .....
-11 • ..= -i1.--..1..•----"-ri.
•, .„ , , • . • , • „, . . - ,; • ;, • , ,„ .- ,-,
--, ,
1.__.4 t.
!1! • ;'i ; 1 jli .4
IL :.• . p. . 11 .,.
• , • . . .11 + .1. ....11`..
tl, • I 1! , -rill• ..1,
S'1r 4'...!1 • 1 1!' 1i.---; ....------.:' 1 .1
hi !
11!_jil' 11' '11
1, .._, -._,..-t _ji , , :!----4 r' --.
..1 . ;.
r-- I ,
I.-
...
• . -■■■■-■ -..- I •
. " "---P7V r7 /.---
11.5tiS ..n.7.•----i1
r- -
I
_ .• .
1,....L r
.e......? a...........,,E.,_. ...1./.. ,-L..,- 1,-.:_f, „--- --,..
I .
. , , . • _ STICT, 7.,_, c.Fc.....•>... -
. , . • • ......... __..a .
•
• Qb
-
•
•
• t--• • •• .
•
•
- • • •
• • •.
F/•1,--•?/ 772: • 24:P.:OS
• C
• " .•4 N59 3r. 54,7 W, ..440. 00
'
- COW: Cw4
LEGEND
• SET IRON' P•4 PE.
• OR AS NOTED
- O. -rRAFP•t.z. Locovr
4),-
FIR e HY
CA•EN ESASIN
U MAN HOLE.
V PK NAIL .
k-- ' HIGH .CYC ONE
N
•
oPrsEl".
_ t i35..4 .