The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-118-79 - ALLPAK CONTAINER - FUEL TANKSALLPAK CONTAINER INC 480 APE EPIC - 118 -79 • CITY OF/TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT *11/FINAL DECLARATION OF. III /iNON —S I Gib I F I CANCE Description of proposal Addition of Underground Fuel Storage Equipment Proponent Allpak Container Inc Location of Proposal Lead Agency 480 Andover Park East City of Tukwila File No EPIC - 118 -79 This proposal has been determined to (have /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. 0 Responsible Official lCjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date COMMENTS: /27 Signature i ;1909 City Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar Q Bauch, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Kjell Stoknes, Director O.C.D. FROM: Mark Caughey, Coordinator - Current Planning DATE: 28 September 1979 SUBJECT: SEPA REVIEW OF UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS APPLICANTS: Allpak Container, Inc. 480 Andover Park East Southland Corp. 320 Andover Park East SEPA checklists have been submitted to this office in concert with building permit applications for underground fuel storage facilities at the above - referenced addresses. The Fire Marshall has no specific safety concerns, nor has the Public Works staff any specific difficulties with the development. I recommend granting of a Final Declaration of Non - Significance in both cases, and release of building permits. MC /ckh 04 ONCE MEMO CITY of TUKWILA TO: All Reviewing Departments FROM: Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner DATE: 20 September 1979 SUBJECT: SEPA REVIEW, ALLPAK CONTAINER 1. Please return your comments to O.C.D. by 27 September 1979. 2. Drawings for this project have been forwarded to you by the Building Division. MC /ckh • I CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM • PROJECT NAME: AI—LP/S..14. GOIJTAU■JEz. E.Re...czeNW V FLiSL- TM4 S PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 ,AaJDOvEg PARK E. DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 10 SEPT -79 1.. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: engineering: '(U/ /9/74 AIL CM,Mkt+Nr-v7u, by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: • 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: (reviewer) P rmcF.tvED PU, fr ;'ORKS DEPT Cd't'v OF TUKWILA SEP 2 4 t S CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: #46.1_1.P4.K Z0 'NTAINEAZ - UN°E0617ZANtI' FUEL TA,Q1CS PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 A1.3Dov SAZ. P,6.12IG E. DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: lS SEPT ?9 1.. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ■ire: '- 5 - 79 by: J, 119 c-'1 ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: )2J'/OL,5) 7 b CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM RECEIVED CI Ty OF TukWILq • • 1. t 1E79 This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the 11$444Neialpfpr permit. This questionnaire must be completed by.all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 4-444- 1. Name of Proponent: A17-"tite 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 190 / /G'✓. — 7s =oye-O, 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 9--/ 7- 77 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an• accurate understanding of its scope and nature): //u Si e- �-T a A-i Dl /4).!, 2-4D0 7 G EZ /,f/ti 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): /41S C- G(,(10 ,e0'g ,t . Cyr ),./eE -- /v ir 0o = zoo See t j VeVeD /6/ , /e/ , 3 . /o Ot.4vAc .e0A/ ''7/4/ S J /J o•) 60" /5c_A-,✓v . 3 =6 `k /o' 8. stimated Date for Completion of the Proposal( /o -/- 7)7 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local.): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO '/ (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO ✓ (c) Building permit YES./ NO T4,;,(,di ue`t Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO (e) ,Sewer hook up permit YES NO ✓ .('f) `Sign permit YES NO a ' g .°��('g)' ` Water hook up permit YES NO 1 (h) Storm water system permit YES NO (i) Curb cut permit YES NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES . NO / (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 0 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: ilo 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if, none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application. form: %/D II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a') Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features?. -2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air qua 1ity ?,Z ce, jJN._ /.i A.)72F2) (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result-in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO ,/ • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? (i) Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? 7 (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of / existing species? _ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: • • YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise f levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of . an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: �iv,GS w�L� 5rV,e6-7 �ff Sow /-r/E 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parki� facilities, or • demand for new parking? f' /Se-i} -.uv AL)/1-6" O'JE S7f ( . (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks or other'recreational facilities? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) P�o� er or natural sr /aViat E -.0 //o (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic' tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • YES MAYBE NO • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. )‘Oeto! Signature and Title Date