HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-119-79 - BENAROYA COMPANY - SIMON'S RESTAURANTSI_VION'S RESTAURANT
EPIC - 119 -79
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Dinner House Restaurant
Proponent Jack A. Benaroya
Location of Proposal Parkway Plaza West, Southcenter Parkway
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 119 -79
This proposal has been determined to ( /not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (ira /is not) required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c): This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Kjell Stoknes
Director, Office of Community Development
Date AL,' b — - 271? 7? Signature
COMMENTS:
Subject to conditions as follow:
1) Depiction on the project site plan of all utility and other easements.
2) Provision of storm sewer outfall,backflow protection and on -site storm
water retention facilities, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works.
3) :Elimination of the north -most parking area adjacent to the north wall of
the proposed restaurant, or redesign of said parking facility to eliminate
direct access thereto from the adjoining driveway opening on Southcenter
Boulevard.
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Dinner House Restaurant
Proponent Jack A. Benaroya
Location of Proposal Parkway Plaza West, Southcenter Parkway
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 119 -79
This proposal has been determined to (have /not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not) required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a'completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official
Position /Title
Kjell Stoknes
Director, Office of Community Development
Date Signature
COMMENTS:
Subject to conditions as follow:
WI LA •
�� �qsy City ofTukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
▪ Tukwila, Washington 98188
▪ 1908.
Public Works Department 433 -1850
November.2, 1979-
Rudy Maynard
Jack A. Benaroya Company
5950 6th Avenue South
Seattle', Washington 98108
RE: Simon's Restaurant, Parkway Plaza West
An accelerated review of site plan No's. SP #1 & 2, as applicable to the
Simon's Restaurant site, has been provided to expedite construction activities.
These site plans are approved for permit applications per the following comments:.
1. Required permits by this Department to be applied for and obtained 24 hours
prior to construction are the following:
A) Street Use: Curb cut /access
8) Irrigation (Per future plan submittal for D.P.W. review /approval).
C) Sprinkler (fire protection), as required (Per future plan sub-
mittal for D.P.W. review /approval)
D) Sanitary side sewer
E) Water meter
F) Street Use: Storm Drain
2. Domestic water service: provide size and location of water meter on plan
prior to issuance of water meter permit. Domestic water meter will be
at property line and at a point convenient for reading and repair. If
on private property, an easement . shall be provided allowing City of Tukwila
Maintenance and Water Department personnel - continuous access to meter
for repair, maintenance removal, replacement or monitorino.
3. Curb cut /access: The vehicular exit point onto the "internal roadway"
at the northeast corner of Simon's Restaurant property shall be eliminated.
The attached drawing provided a suggested revision to your parking /curb
and planting area design and access.
4. Sanitary side sewer: A letter of intent to provide necessary easements
to adjacent properties shall be on file with the Department of Public
Works prior to issuance of the sanitary side sewer permit. Actual ease-
ment shall be on file prior to the Department of Public Works final
document review for issuance of Occupancy Permit by the Building Department.
Sanitary side sewer (6") shall be provided with cleanout or manhole
structure at all bends
Page 2
5. Storm drain: Just prior to last reach of pipe and just prior to entering
into existing public storm system, a backflow prevention device, (flap
valve) shall be provided in a Type II (WSHD -DOT) catch basin or manhole
structure.-
Grading and drainage for property shall be provided in such a manner as
to contain and dispose of all drainage from the site into the existing
storm system without draining into other properties or into public rights
of way.
The Building Department is authorized,to release the Building Permit by the Public
Works Department per this review.
Sincerely
Q-2 -P71.6v
Phillip R. Fraser
Senior Engineer
cc. Al Pieper, Building Official
attachments
•
Kenneth D. Long & Associates 100 Mercer Street, Seattle, WA 98109, (206) 285 -9080
Architecture & Planning
October 22, 1979
The Public Works Department
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
.Tukwila, WA 98188
ATTN: Phillip R. Fraser
Senior Engineer
RE: Building Permit Application
Simon's Restaurant
Parkway Plaza West
Dear Mr. Fraser:
r3/4
[F �rr
Y
Cl ?'r U.
MT, 2 4 1978
The enclosed six copies of Sheet SP -2, entitled "Site Utility Plan, Parkway
Plaza West," are submitted in response to your letter of October 1, 1979.
.Please note that sheet, SP -2 shows the location and inverts of catch basins
as well as the sizes of the existing storm water lines that serve the proposed
project.
Also, enclosed are six copies of sheet SP -2, entitled "Parkway Plaza Building."
Please note that storm water drainage to the south and east of the Simon's
Restaurant will drain into an existing catch basin shown on the SP -2 sheet
entitled Parkway Plaza Building. These existing catch basins and storm .
drainage lines were previous sized to accept storm water from this project.
Please note that the sanitary side sewer line is shown on the enclosed sheets
along with the size, type of material, and bedding and point of connections
into the existing system.
In a previous meeting with you and Mr. Joel Benoliel, of the Jack A. Benaroya
Co., on September 6, 1979, it was determined that no new easements were
required for water or sewer in as much as the lines were all within the
property for the restaurant.
Please note that there is presently an existing irrigation loop around the
proposed building serving the existing landscape on the perimeter streets •
around the building. It is the Jack A. Benaroya Co.'s desire to submit
the irrigation layout prior to occupancy of the restaurant along with the
comprehensive planting plan. This is in accordance with the requirements
as indicated in the letter from the Office of Community of Development dated
October 8, 1979, Item 6. If submittal of the irrigation layout along with
the planting plan at a later date is not acceptable to you, please let me
know immediately.
•
Kenneth D. Long & Associates 100 Mercer Street, Seattle, WA 98109, (206) 285 -9080
Architecture & Planning
October 22, 1979
Page 2
If further clarifications are necessary, please let me know immediately.
We will attempt to make any clarification immediately as requested, in order
to avoid the need of resubmittals.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
Yours Truly,
Kenneth D. Long A.I.A.
KDL:jc
Enclosure
CC: Bob Fehnel
1908
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Public Works Department. 433 -1850
Kenneth D. Long & Associates
100 Mercer Street
Seattle, WA 93109
Dear Sirs:
October 1, 1979
r-.7-,l-U-
1,1 0 j
OCT 3 1979
Re: Simon's Restaurant, Parkway Place West
The review of the site plan No. A -1 has been provided by the Public
Works Department and is being returned to you at this time to allow you
to address the following comments and indicate on the plans:
1) Storm and Sanitary Sewers - indicate the invert elevation location,
size and type of material and bedding and point of connection into
public facilities. Also show complete description of existing and /or
new easements necessary to provide such connections.
2) Water Service,Irrigation, and Fire Service: Indicate on plan drawing
location and size of water service, irrigation plan, water meter, and
other appurtenances.
Please resubmit six (6) sets of the above plans with the above comments
addressed for Public Works review.
PRF /jm
Enclosure
cc: Jack A. Benaroya Company
Phillip R. Fraser
Senior Engineer
Jack .A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seams, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
October 31, 1979
Terence Monaghan
Director of Public Works
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Water line easement for Simon's Restaurant
I understand that the City requires an easement in its favor for the
water line extension to Simon's Restaurant site, from the existing City
line to the west of that site. However, it is impractical to provide
an easement at this time because the exact location of the water meter
and water line extension are not yet definite.
Therefore, please accept this letter as our assurance that when such
information is available, we will provide an appropriate easement and a
bill of sale as was done with the office building so as to incorporate
this line into the City's system.
I understand that in reliance on this assurance, the City will issue the
necessary permits.
Joel Benoliel
General Counsel
JtiVrlL4
OCr,3i 1979
• 4 r►n4
INDUSTRIALPARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
1. \k"" 4'4 City City Tukwila
k % 6200 So enter Boulevard
J
W 2 o Tukwila Washington 98188
1909
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
M EMORANDUM
TO: Kjell Stoknes, 0.C.D. Director
• FROM: Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner
DATE: October 23, 1979
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment - Simon's Restaurant
INTRODUCTION
The subject site is part of the Benaroya Company's Parkway Plaza West
Development, and was indicated on the original project master plan as
restaurant usage. The actual site boundary was established under
application BLA -6 -78, and the building /landscape concept was approved
by the Board of Architectural Review at its meeting of 27 September 1979.
DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Building Division, 0.C.D. - No comments
Fire Department - No comments
Police Department - Restaurant use will generate increased demand
for police services.
Public Works Dept. - 1) Backflow protection and storm water reten-
tion facilities needed.
2) Acquire all necessary utility easements
and designate them on the site plan.
3) Provide sidewalks on all internal street
frontages.
4) Relocate or eliminate parking aisle adja-
cent to north building elevation.
ANALYSIS
This project has been subject to extensive public discussion, both generally,
in the context of zoning'for the Parkway Plaza Project, and specifically,
at the Board of Architectural Review. •Thus the potentially adverse affects
of the restaurant upon the community have been addressed and appropriate
off - setting measures have been incorporated into the building design and
site layout.
Kjell Stoknes, O.C.D. Liirector
Environmental Assessment
Page 2
October 23, 1979
The specific matters regarding vehicle and pedestrian circulation raised
by the Public Workds Department are worthy of comment:
1) Traffic Aisle Alignment
Condition 5 of the B.A.R. approval of the project allows the
city to suggest an alternative alignment for the parking area
immediately north of the building to minimize conflicting
movements with traffic entering from Southcenter Parkway.
Example 1 enclosed depicts an alternative alignment which com-
• pletely eliminates interface conflicts between the parking aisle
and public right -of -way. The applicants should be able to
improve on this concept, as it has some disadvantages as shown.
However, the advantages of this approach, in addition to increas-
ing on -site traffic circulation safety, include enhanced poten-
tial for screening of the parking area, and addition of street -
side planting area.
A net loss of seven spaces from the applicant's original
proposal would result from implementing this example. However,
the site already has parking well in.,excess of ordinance minimum.
The point of this exercise, however, is to illustrate the possi-
bility of solving the city's concern for traffic safety, without
seriously compromising the vitality of the project's design
concept.
2
Sidewalks
The request for sidewalks on the north and west periphery of
the project does..not Seem warranted in light of the following:
a) Pedestrian access from Southcenter Parkway to the building's
principal entry is already provided at the south end of
the site.
b) A pedestrian walk already exists on the west edge of the
principal north -south directional aisle which is adjacent
to the west boundary of the restaurant site. The suggested
walkway shown on Example 1 would seem unnecessarily redundant.
A walkway solution as envisioned by. Public Works is also shown on Example 1.
However, we suggest that the space and cost devoted to this walkway is
better appropriated to.enhanced perimeter landscaping.
RECOMMENDATION
We recommend issuance of a final declaration of non - significance for
development of Simon's Restaurant, conditional upon the following:
Kje1l Stoknes, O.C.D. "rector 'Page 3
Environmental Assessment October 23, .1979
1) Depiction on the project site plan of all utility and other
easements.
2) Provision of storm sewer outfall backflow protection and on-
site storm water retention facilities, to the satisfaction of
the Director of Public Works.
3) Elimination of the north -most parking area adjacent to the
north wall of the proposed restaurant, or redesign of said
parking facility to eliminate direct access thereto from the
adjoining driveway opening on Southcenter Boulevard.
MC /mkb
(.. .CITY OF TUKWILA (..
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: SIMON'S RESTAURANT
PROJECT ADDRESS: Parkway Plaza West, near the Boeing Office Tower
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 10 -10 -79 Comments due back to OCD by 10 -17 -79
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)
❑ Building: by:
❑ En 'veering: by:
Fire: r 0—i 0 1 y by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑. Police: by:
(revi ewer)
• 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM
PROJECT NAME: SIMON'S RESTAURANT
PROJECT ADDRESS: Parkway Plaza West, near the Boeing Office Tower
DATE_ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • 10 -10 -79 Comments due back to OCD by 10 -17 -79
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date)' / (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
olice: by:
2. ANY ERTINENT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW! FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
SIMON'S RESTAURANT
Parkway Plaza West, near the Boeing Office Tower
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 10 -10 -79 Comments due back to OCD by 10 -17 -79
1. DEPARTMENTAL .REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
L� Byilding: by:
Engineering: I0//6/79 p-e2,, co,-ry Jwc by: v(
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Br'c.ICFLow r cnEcilok) AYJ D s11 ?4 voorTilt Ui10 u Ockl) FAD . L) De':loa,TV 4■JD Accuttz.a.
eAseAsi)TS ON PU+.k) Fog, h)ATti� STo2M, sEWEAC b) SIDewAIKS. Moth Dm okJ
A.LL
slrivT frzott 4es 4) R.t'I.OcPn PAURic 1:05.ut 4DJAc-SPr TD )J0 e11,1 g.Levk410.1
CITY OF TUKWILA
E'IVIRO;tinE 1TAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEh FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
SIMON'S RESTAURANT
Parkway Plaza West, near the Boeing Office Tower
DATE_ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 10 -10 -79 Comments due back to OCD by 10 -17 -79
1. DEPARTME TAL REVIEW: (date) ' (reviewer)
Er Bui1din /% '7 b
9 �/9 7 y G�-�
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ .Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINE/NTT COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the. Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold. determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: The Jack A. Benaroya Company
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 5950 Sixth Avenue South
762 -4750 Seattle, WA 98108
3. Date Checklist Submitted: October I0, 1979
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Building Department
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Simon 's Restaurant
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an. accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
9331 Sq. Ft. Restaurant, 1 story wood construction, featuring
fine cuisine and surroundings.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Proposed restaurant is located on west side of Southcenter
Parkway between the Parkway Plaza Office Building (on the Snuth)
and the Carriage House Fwrniture Store (on the North). The Village
.Inn Restaurant is immediately North of the Carriage House.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 6 Months
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit YES X NO
. •
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NOX
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YESX NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES NOX
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESX; NO
(1) Other: Seattle -King County Environmental Health Services
(Class A Restaurant Permit) Washington State Liquor Control
Board (Class H license)
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
NO
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Application for Building Permit Plan Check has been filed.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? X _
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? (Minor only -for parking lot run -off and X _
pedestal setting for building).
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?. X
-2-
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f)
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: (a) Building will be supported on piling.
(b) Site will be covered by building paivng and landscaping.
(c) Topography changes will be minor. only.
(d) No known unique geologic, or physical features are involved.
(e) Erosion will be prevented by paving and landscaping.
(f) Not applicable.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:. Restaurant. operation will have negligible effect on
ambient air quality, creation of odors, air movementaand climate.
Effect will not be detrimental.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? _
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? _
(g) Change in the•quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _
-3-
X
X
1
•
• YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
X
(1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? X
Explanation: (b) The run off water created by the parking and
building roof area has previously been planned for tbebe run
into existing catch basins and existing storm drainage system.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X _
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? X
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Explanation: Proposed development will utilize landscaping
consistent with that used in adjacent development.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna? X X
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation: Canyon hillsides to the west provide habitat for
fauna. Landscape areas will continue to harbor earthworms.
U14 :similar now on the site.
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? X
Explanation: Since site is undeveloped, no noise is generated. Proposal
will involve noise levels generally associated with a restaurant,
patrons, automobiles and service vehicles, mainly.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
Tight or glare? X
Explanation: Proposal will include normal building lighting,
lighting of parking areas -and light from headlights of patrons'
automobiles.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
X
Explanation: Site currently unused. Proposed restaurant is planned
land use, approved by action of the planning. commission.
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation: No significant natural resources are involved.
Use of petroleum rhray be slightly reduced by adding to the
choice of fine restaurants available outside of Seattle City
limits.
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation: No hazardous materials are involved.
•
• YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
X
Explanation: Proposal will serve need of current human population
for fine restaurant facilities in this area.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation: Not directly applicable.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X _
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X _
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? X
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
Explanation: A, B, C,- Impact resulting from new access to
restaurant will use some of capacity of southcenter parkway
and connecting roads.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a,need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X
X
X
X
•
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? Environmental. X
Health Services
Explanation: Governmental services as required by a restaurant
will be needed use. Need for practically no services required
for an .undeveloped site.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
X
Explanation: Project will be designed for energy use efficiency.
See also explanation under Item 9 above.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation: Services for new building will be handled by
existing service capacity.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation: No health hazards involved.
X
X
X
• •
18: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
X
Explanation: No views or vistas are involved. Project will include
an architecturally attractive building landscaped in keeping with the
locality.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
X
Explanation: This proposal will make the choice of an additional
fine restaurant available in. South King County.
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation: Not applicable to this proposal.
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
1141i, I A• A •
Signature and Title
rn iii /i 1
Date
X