The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-13-88 - SCHNEIDER GERALD - SCHNEIDER TOWNHOMESPARKSIDE APARTMENTS (SCHNEIDER) CONSTRUCT TOWNHOMES IN THREE BUILDINGS 153RD ST. & 65T" AVE. S. EPIC 13 -88 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal CONSTRUCT 9 (2- STORY) TOWNHOMES IN THREE BUILDINGS Proponent GERALD E. SCHNEIDER Location of Proposal, including street address, if any EAST END OF 153RD STREET AND EAST OF 65TH AVENUE SOUTH Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -13 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. El There is no comment period for this DNS Ei This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Date ) Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS ' Y OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN EPIC 13.88 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM r TO: I J ( .BLDG* [-( PLNG r--1 P.W. (l FIRE n POLICE [-I P & R PROJECT PA-2KSiDe— (SC6//VER -6C 170 AiDr S, LOCATION (S3 = -} cF 65:72406- So. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED 4:43 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4-A6/88 STAFF COORDINATOR 6/Awcsv RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE P4,12 O e, ,701' COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CN CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM EPIC ' j3 -8 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG 1 J( PLNG n P.W. n FIRE n POLICE n P & R PROJECT (SC ry/vE5l.1)c e LOCATION &7t- 00 OF ($3 f"--I' d- A. of 6SAyr' Sc. FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED '''713 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY -4-/J8 /8c STAFF COORDINATOR 6(Awcrsci RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 April 13, 1988 Mr. Carl Bloss Schneider Homes 6510 Southcenter Blvd. #1 Tukwila, Wa 98188 Dear Mr. Bloss: Review of your SEPA checklist for the Parkside Apartment project indicates that you have forgotten to sign and date the document. Please come in and sign the document or provide another signed document by April 20, 1988. Failure to provide a signed document by this date will prevent the City from making an environmental determination and prohibit Board of Architectural Review action. Sincerely, Vernon M. Umetsu Associate Planner PH: 433 -1858 VU:jj TELEPHONE MEMO RE: 64KS/7) r i�G7�S PERSON CONTACTED: 5- Ce/Ve72) S (G.i,906v&C , &'s PAO/ve-) PERSON CALLING: �1/lory DATE: 'I-41 /8 8 INFORMATION ITEMS: CITY OF TUKWILA CN Ph j 1 (k , r i C b L Rev l ecdt) EPIC FILE -2 -Dg DRC eNtitIONNENZAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: (—( BLDG PLNG P.W. ri FIRE n POLICE fl P & R PROJECT S Chine de,( (ow►l alim,es LOCATION Cad j3j%f 1 1GG 7 625- A-v FILE NO. Og' v3, e,h DATE TRANSMITTED `312 5l g �j RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 3I31I g STAFF COORDINATOR gE CCA Fox RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 I Pi [C lnl5_�L�JJ ) 219881 '► JE dUiL A PI..ANNkNG DEPT. A. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No. Epic File No. 13 -88 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 2727 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Parkside 2. Name of applicant: Schneider Homes, Inc. 3. Address and phone n tuber of applicant and contact person: 1 48-.7-47/ H.C. Bloss 6510 SoUTKCe -A(Tee. E /eel./ eel/ 7 C) c (c..4) a i,4 9-g/88 4. Date checklist prepared: April 4, 1988 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): June 10, 1988 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NO 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO -2- • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Parcel A contains 16'500 square feet. 5 unit condos are proposed with 10 parking stalls Parcel B contains 11,220 square feet. 4 unit condos are proposed with 8 parking stalls. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See attached legals 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Nn TO BE COMPLETED BYPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one):! Flat hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty clay d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. r) t) e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Filling and grading will be minimal and balanced on -site. f.. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, when__ under construction, but slopes will be protected and all roof and yard drains will be put into storm drains g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 42% Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temoprary erfosion control during construction such as silt fences and mulching. Atter construction, permj►ant landscaping and yard drainage will minimize eryosion impacts. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal construction of housing b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NONE 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. NO • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Surface water wlITGe collected from hardsurtaces and channeled to existing storm drainage systems 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NO 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NO c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water runoff will be collected on site and piped to existing storm drain system in the street. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. It is s ossible that o' .I1 •11 and building material cQuld enter storm runoff system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, d runoff water impacts, if any: All foo water will be taken to storm drains and plan ing of lawn will help_penetration of surface water 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: ald-r aspen, other X evergreen tree• a ar, pine, other X shrubs x grass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Most of site will be cleared and relandscaped. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NO Evaluation for Agency Use Only • '• Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The entire site will be landscaped with lawn, firs, maples, and decorative shrubs. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, ther: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: NONE fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: NONE b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NO Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. F1Prtrir for heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:. Compliance with State and Local energy conservation for Building const ruction. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NONE • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise typical of small wood frame construction between 7:30am and 5:OOpm 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Apartments b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. NONE Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -3 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? R -3 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 18 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NONE k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Complies with existigngzoning Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? 9 units middle income b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 20' wood framing roof b. What views in the immediate vicinity would altered or obstructed? NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Esthetic building design and associated landscaping of building and parking areas. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Little or no glare. Build'n• • h security and safeey b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal ?. NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? City park and tennis courts on south side of property b. Would the proposed project displace any existing . recreational uses? If so, describe. no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: none Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. South 154th Street will extend 102' b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? NO c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Will have 18 and eliminate no parking • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Extension of south 154th street 102' e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 64 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: NONE 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Fire and police protection, but impact would be insi gnificant b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NONE 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: el ty, natural gas, wat- refuse service, eptic em, otter. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Puget Power and Pacific No rthwest Bell water and sanitary sewer - City of .Tukwila C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY •LICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No significant incressp nr rarP of rge Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No significant effect Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A MEvaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Not significant Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? N/A Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the.proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Not Significant Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: NONE 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None to my knowledge Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? NONE Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: NONE -21- TO BE COMPLETED B•PLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To build affordable housing 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? NONF. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -23- PARKSIDE IOWN HOfr\ES ZONING AND CODE DATA ZONING: R-3 OCCUPANCY R- 1 ondN \ -I TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION- V -N, NON - SPRINT LERED TOTAL SRS AREA 6 r-T. TOTAL BUILDING AREA 5827 PERCENT OF SITE COVERAGE BUILDING SUMMARY 7YPE NAT AIVA 1 LDG A °J827 •f TOTAL 4327. s.F. UNIT SUMMARY UNIT NO. NrT ARKA lOUANTI Y Mill 1201 1207 SF 1 UNT 1287 1290 SF )POT 1147 1110 SF 1 TOTAL 5 7 SITE COVERAGti TOj_ . TOTAL LANDSCAPING 6NCLUDINO SIDEWALKS) PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE TOTAL RESCDENITAL UNITS TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE PARKING STALL& IO TOTAL :5 CODE& UB.C:1966 U.Y.C. -1985 U.P.0 -1983 U.P.C.-1985 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE -1986 DRAWING INDEX .IA TITLE SHEET k ATP.49 SITE PLAN A 2.0 BLDG TYPE A FDN., FLOOR AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN A2.1 BLDG TYPE LFDN., FLOOR ADN ROOF °'RAMING PLAN A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- -BLDG. TYPE: A A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - -BLDG. TYPE;, B GARAGES - -PLANS AND ELEVATIONS A4A UNIT 1201 - -UNIT PLAN A4.I UNIT 1287 - -UNIT PLAN A4.2 UNrf 1143 - -UNIT PLAN AS.0 WALL SECTIONS, DETAILS A 5.1 DETAILS .41A .49 LANDSCAPE PLAN. see- ti-TE. CR 141,IDSCAFE pIA►J. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CZUUc ER''S IL.CIBRUR156,14 ADOMOrj; dPe2CEI- Ad ■41-. 4 pp 20)54010 K UfT CnU.rrr, '7, i0 pi, �r m Blow. 2 VICINITY n4 - 0 A10 N : � � Jars �LG , Z A pmaceL ta■ � �� C . - - . �� IJG�f,D, wAk VOL. 14- F 41e Ueefe 2I , Att 4 -f a p 4 I . . f , c am ; J 't f CD►JIJ,'(D Pda4h A9 ‘ t 1201 L-ID --tYp l I I 1143 a4 E ii veg 0 Jf of : /vire eAgro4 SrtaL CoLlsfl�gA 10 Ac, Gpea‘kx.e. w/ uwuv. A USL IC. tvDit6 G Vfr� >A-ra0 7 Io Noce; IVtk'rev, vIG u-m ,ira►x w AUDR.JI Ot..110 Grry 17A-rw0. 7 f iof sic, 4b Caeut, J' fee- s79.4 I /mi U 0 Dace. cp6awsetsJ19 l✓ t 02WID7 -t' pop, lE,P6 1� 0.0' Cp .wer. r • ,641 4f nm$J. CAJ CDA► YV 6,9% "zCA AM J, 6.6turrOgr AxAvrak coal. 1,1910.; H 0 TV, -t'b F2. ry .f -cit1 Je. A■ey A-rp (1EID i -E1 I1 6o,,� e-p e fi A■i►J 5, 1 - STp �O-' 47 \V • E1�1/ L-UL►►TS t); : 3 L ■11. . ; ,. . ...G.A.., r. 1 •••••., ....•..,4%, ....., ,,,11.“-e-, I .,,,.....,.., . '77 . _ . .- 1,,2...,.t._ 1. C ! 1 • 1..--- - -. :..: .„-..1.4., _ j ..; • .:: • • 1.-..:-.4--. - . ' 12141114$ WS_TR EirDRM rr 4 -3; PUNA PLAN . warrg.s • 1. .1- • ts., _ AseereG u...z.` • ito, 1 Mfg 611.000 *Ae-ZO...Lt • %En 0 ow* pir...z.-rfre DEP iteDRM 02 • kir ■ 1. ,■■•3 r7. - .AL _ • '1* 4 ,:• rsz 4T UNIT # 1201 -3BR 0 (‘I I r• t Z. MCOND ROOK PIM (.0 • 1 1 • • PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES �., ••L AA.11111 Y \A 1 V1• ZONING AND CODE DATA ZONING: OCCUPANCY: 12,1 E A11 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION- v -N ' N .SPRINKLERED TOTAL SITE AREA 12,100 TOTAL BUILDING AREA PERCENT OF SITE COVERAG. .627 BUILDING SUMMARY TYPE NET ARLA -Carpi 48oa UNIT SUMMARY UNTTINO. N$T AREA OUANTTIY NIT I2DI 1207 SF 1F.PpucAOLE.. UNIT 1287 1290 SF 2 UNIT 1143 TOTAL 1110 SF 2 4 SITE COVERAGE TOTAL. TOTAL IANDSCAPINO (INCLUDING SIDEWALKS) PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TOTAL IMPERVIOUS S11PRAf PARIUNG STALLS: e 4 TOTAL 13 CODES U.B.C. -[985 U.M.C. -1985 U.P.0 -1985 U.F.C. -1988 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE -1988 DRAWING INDEX A 1.0, • TITLE SHEET artuaeo SITE PLAN UL../Y 1 a E. L r 1J1 V.. L WN JL%. !Ur L INLJIJr r INt11 V r Ldt A 2.0 BLDG TYPE A FDN., FLOOR, AND ROOF FRAMING PLAN A 2. I BLDG TYPE B FDN., FLOOR, ADN ROOF F^ WING PLAN A'5.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS- -BLDG. TYPES "A' A 3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - -BLDG. TYPE 'b NA. GARAGES - -PLANS AND ELEVATIONS PF..LCC 3LE) A40 UNIT 1201 - -UNIT PLAN Ai.I UNIT 1287- -UNIT PLAN 4.41-.2 UNIT 1112 UNIT PLAN A 5.0 WALL SECTIONS, DETAILS 5,1 DETAILS ... ,36 A41UK+1ED LANDSCAPE PLAN; 5E.E. SIT1= IDI.LULJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION : 14, 15 �c ko t71.17cx. ,uucn+ -1 am w erc tIJ is nttl E �.;. "�T-e Tr4F.ac krl:rasE4. IL \L. t',A'f H- p� ts, Pie ■■:. 6-FEET --ME �c-c A108 AL A.. v • 0.o 5ouT+4 054-14 S-1'; L 4kice pe Fik:MfirEPIAMA6. 154241/ 1 • • �1� 4R eiALL (G a ¢u4 Lk 1t G t,A pLeur.,meip atCcurax--ral 7/Icyeco. *YAW tJ & R \ & ajar: j(%- \‘,01‘4,&41.. D7 iw 1b I 1 T au */& cO FiFLG12CrO 1 � 8 uLrr uiJr( 1143 r 10277 H I ,2; -V_ 1 /7-7-3(i lo l 444,0041-- eD c�--- —4247 0 MIId, I Froz sec- YoL. 4034 f`J 24.1j' \1' IZIICDF' cco 4uur>7 fRR �,zo�J�L • LEFT SIDE RIGHT SIDE REAR J. sm.inj ,,.i.1 : VII i ..u.ilal CI ■IMPS i ,. I1 i FRONT .1 .I+ It • 4• 1 - r yKT rosy BUNG TYPE & *XTR. ELEVATIONS. Ia Lr� , • I•non, -.- 4t 6,,.•••• 1 • "4" • '.4M V2../.. _II-. • 1" 7•--11‘ iliDOM MOOR PM* (A> • •en• 4.. 2.. • Ai, ••••■•- .‘4,21U, ••••••••16., 4.1•404.4-45 • c.1 rt* • •••••••-: J. L. rifler FLOOR RAM ..01% 24.120.1a. • 1 . • • • ; - •••• ,110 • Jo I I EMI L • V.41.- r- WC.. M., 04. Alb ■•••401... • u'• o' : • • • NI !".•• • . • • sal;t -! r•••• :1 ,t1 ; • 0 ■'•• 2. VOMIT 14.00P, aMit 1/-4.- A2. awes.. WALL. MISMCOULAL 1.vs. • ht.. • _. 4_ • .• .41111.1.CSO •••••I e...d2OEC" • ova ....f••••41., L t1L% ,r ' -, I I 1111111,11011111111 th ..�..a.., ITRKSIDE WNHOME5 'q' y T . • i. �'. • , • .( �. t;•: .�'r /�•:+�'1� J J.