Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-13-89 - HALVORSON LON - 4 LOTS REZONE (R-1 TO M-1)HALVORSON REZONE REZONE FOUR LOTS FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 4625 S. 134T" ST. & 4535 S. 135T" ST. EPIC 13 -89 Citibf Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 89 -2 -R APPLICANT: Lon Halvorson - 12515 Willows Rd, Suite 170 Kirkland, WA 98034 REQUEST: Rezone four lots from R -1 -7.2 (Single Family Residential) to M -1 (Light Industrial) LOCATION: Tax Lot No 0051 - located at 4625 S. 134th St. Tax Lot Nos 0046, 0049, 0050 - located at 4535 S. 135th Street The City Council conducted a review of the above request on August 7, 1989, and found that the request should be denied. The City Council adopted the findings and conclusions as stated in the minutes of the Tukwila City Council meeting on August 7, 1989. The action of the Board of Adjustment in granting a variance, shall be final and conclusive unless, within ten days from the date of the Board's action, an applicant or an aggrieved party makes an application to the Superior Court of King County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition, or a writ of mandamus. NAME: TITLE: DATE: CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKti'ILA, WASHINGTON 98!8 August 18, 1989 Mr. Lon Halvorson 12515 Willows Road Suite 170 Kirkland, WA 98034 Dear Mr. Halvorson: PHONE n(206)433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor I have attached the minutes for the August 7, 1989 City Council meeting at which time your rezone request for property at 4625 S. 134th and 4535 S. 135th was presented. As you will note, the motion to rezone failed to pass a council vote at this time. Please call if you have any further questions. Sincerely, a. Molly A. Headley Assistant Planner CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCE.NTE. R BOULEVARD, T!I W!L 4, 141,4 SHINGTCN 9,4188 August 18, 1989 Mr. William Turner 13435 - 48th Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Dear Mr. Turner: PHONE K (_°06) 433 1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Per your request, I have attached the minutes for the August 7, 1989 City Council meeting which concerns the decision on the rezone of the property at 4625 S. 134th and 4535 S. 135th. As you will note, the motion to rezone failed. Please call if you have further questions. Sincerely, a. Molly (A. Headley Assistant Planner 1 August 7, 1989 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER and PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OFFICIALS CONSENT AGENDA BID AWARDS Interurban Ave. So. from 52nd Ave. So. to So. 139th North Hill Reservoir and Pump Station, Phase II v / • ,ip TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers Regular Meeting M I N U T E S Mayor Mayor Van Dusen called the Regular Meeting of the Tukwila City Council to order and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. MABEL J. HARRIS; JOE H. DUFFIE; MARILYN STOKNES, Council President; EDGAR D. BAUCH; JOAN HERNANDEZ; CLARENCE MORIWAKI. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERTSON BE EXCUSED FROM THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. JOHN COLGROVE, City Attorney; MAXINE ANDERSON, City Clerk; RICK BEELER, Planning Director; ALAN DOERSCHEL, Finance Director; ROSS EARNST, Public Works Director. a. Approval of Vouchers Claims Fund Vouchers #40250 General Fund City Street Arterial Street Land Acq., Building Water Fund Sewer Fund Foster Golf Course Equipment Rental - #40491 $105,937.30 73,817.91 78,004.82 2,036.27 24,022.76 56,531.88 2,285.64 77,793.61 $420,430.19 MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY BAUCH, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE BID OF GARY MERLINO CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $565,199.35 FOR THE INTERURBAN AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE BID OF SKAAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,517,000 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTH HILL RESERVOIR AND PUMP STATION, PHASE II.* Alan Doerschel, Finance Director, explained that the City borrowed $3.6 million in December, 1986. We have three years to spend that money without penalty or restriction. If this project is abandoned, the oldest of the bonds will have to be redeemed. This would reflect poorly on the City. . Council Member Moriwaki explained why the new reservoir is necessary. We are presently being billed a demand metering charge by Seattle Water Department. This is approximately $40,000 per year and will continue to increase. This water would be the reserve water if a major fire were to occur; it would be used if the service from Seattle was interrupted, and the pumps installed with this system would help increase the water pressure on the hill. The cost is increased because of the rock on the site. The explosion of the rock was deemed unsatisfactory. Council member Moriwaki reviewed a memo submitted by Council Member Robertson discussing the cost of the project. He states that the City needs pumps, not the reservoir. �' • TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING August 7, 1989 Page 2 BID AWARDS - Cont. North Hill Reservoir and Pump Station, Phase II (cont.) Ordinance #1525 - Amending 1989 Budget to provide bond pro- ceeds and increased expenditures for completion of water reservoir PUBLIC HEARINGS Vacation of a portion of 35th Ave. So. from So. 124th to end of 35th Ave. So. travel- ling north Council Member Bauch said the talk of a reservoir has been going on for a long time. The rate - payers need to buy a reservoir. Council Member Duffie commented that the City does need a reservoir. The people on the hill need better water pressure. Council Member Harris said we still need a reserve water supply if we are going to be a water district. Each year the construction gets more expensive. We need action, not talk. Ross Earnst, Public Words Director, explained that they decided to put in 16" line to take the water from the reservoir down to the valley if it were needed quickly. This was based on fine flows. The 16" is oversized for just a pump station. The reservoir is needed for three reasons: (1) To equalize the amount of water to avoid the demand charge; (2) To provide water for every customer in case we lose the supply from Seattle; (3) Fire flow. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wash., amending the 1989 Budget adopted by Ordinance No. 1493, providing bond proceeds and increased expenditures in the water /sewer construction fund for completion of water reservoir, and establishing an effective date. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1525 BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Van Dusen declared the Public Hearing open on the request from Sabey Corporation and Inco Express to vacate the portion of 35th Avenue So. generally lying north of South 134th from South 124th to the end of 35th Avenue So. tra- velling north. Mr. Phil Talmadge, representing Inco Express, explained that Inco Express and Sabey Corp. are jointly petitioning the City for this vacation. Inco owns lots 9 through 15 and Mr. De Patro owns lot 16 on the east. On the west side of 35th is Sabey Corporation. He asked that the street vacation occur without any cost or compensation. In 1985 -86 King County issued a commercial building permit with certain conditions' to Sabey. The County required that landscaping occur, that a firelane be provided - -this was a defacto vacation of the street. It was done without notice to Inco. There was flooding onto Inco property as a result of the blacktopping that occurred. All of this caused problems between all parties involved. This went on for a long period of time without significant action by the County. .Finally in February, 1989, the King County Prosecutor said that the County would proceed with a vacation of 35th Ave. South. The County agreed, in writing, that this would be done without cost to Inco. They are asking that Tukwila waive the compen- sation because the County promised that this street vacation would occur without compensation. Council Member Harris asked if Inco is going to dedicate the south 10 feet of lot 9 to the City. • TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING August 7, 1989 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS - Cont. Vacation of a portion of 35th Ave. So. from So. 124th to end of 35th Ave. So. travel- ling north (cont.) Annexation of 5 houses located at 53rd Ave. So. and So. 139th (Foster Island) Ordinance #1526 - Annexing an unincor- porated island of territory at So. 139th and 53rd Ave. So. OLD BUSINESS Ordinance #1527 - Rezoning certain real property located at 14915 57th Ave. So. (Tukwila Junction) Mr. Talmadge said this is not something connected with the vacation of 35th So. and could be taken up separately. There being no further testimony from the audience, Mayor Van Dusen closed the Public Hearing. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE STREET VACATION ORDINANCE BE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Van Dusen declared the Public Hearing open on the pro- posed annexation of five houses located at approximately 53rd Ave. So. and South 139th, across from Foster Park. The area under discussion should have been included in the 1989 Foster Annexation, but due to an error by the Boundary Review Board, the area was omitted. Steve Ormiston, 13726 53rd Ave. So., spoke in opposition to the annexation. This is just another bureaucracy to deal with. George Thornton, 13738 53rd Ave. So., said he built his house there in 1959 and has seen a lot of changes. He is opposed to annexation. There being no further comments, the Public Hearing was closed. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wash., enacted pursuant to RCW 35A.14, annexing an unincorporated island of territory within the City, con- taining approximately three acres and located generally at South 139th Street and 53rd Avenue South, and fixing the effective date of annexation. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1526 BE ADOPTED AS READ.* Mayor Van Dusen read a letter from James Tracy, Director of Parks, Planning and Research Department, supporting this annexation in the interest of efficient service delivery. Helen Thornton, 13738 53rd Ave. So., explained that arguing on this annexation started before 1959 and has been going on since; it has to stop. May be with annexation it will stop. When they were not allowed to vote on annexation, it added fuel to the fire. People's feelings were hurt. They were denied the right to vote. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wash., rezoning certain real property located at 14915 57th Avenue South from R -1 -12.0 to R-1-7.2 and pro- viding for an effective date. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1527 BE ADOPTED AS READ.* TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING August 7, 1989 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS - Cont. Ordinance #1527 - Rezoning certain real property located at 14915 57th Ave. So. (Tukwila Junction) _3 l • Council Member Moriwaki stated he would not vote on this ordinance as he has been in contact with the owner of one of the houses and there is a possibility he may rent from them. MOTION CARRIED WITH HARRIS VOTING NO. Proposed Ordinance- MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT THE PROPOSED Changing the zoning ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. designation of property located at 4625 So. City Attorney Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of 134th and 4535 So. Tukwila, Wash., changing the zoning designation of certain 135th (Halvorson) real property located at 4625 South 134th Street and 4535 South 135th Street from R -1 -7.2 to M -1, and providing for an effective date. Amend Agenda NEW BUSINESS Budget Transfer #89 -06 Funding for staff at Golf Course Interlocal Agreement with King Co. for maint. & operation of the 16th Ave. Bridge & to authorize the Mayor to execute an electrical repair agreement MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS READ.* Council Member Bauch spoke in opposition to the ordinance. At the public hearing it was obvious that the people in the area did not want this. The proposed zoning has only been in the Comp. Plan for about three months, and there is no reason to change it now. Council Member Harris agreed with Mr. Bauch. The people in the area want it to be R- 1 -7.2. Council Member Moriwaki concurred. One of the primary reasons the City Council supported the annexations was to increase the single family residential density of the com- munity, and this would be taking away from that objective. There are nice homes in that area, and it would be sad to see them destroyed just for quick profit. *MOTION FAILED. Mayor Van Dusen asked to have the next item, Review of the draft blanket permit system, moved to Miscellaneous. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THIS ITEM BE MOVED TO MISCELLANEOUS. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT BUDGET TRANSFER MOTION NO. 89 -06, PROVIDING FUNDING FOR SALARIES FOR NEW STAFF AT FOSTER GOLF LINKS. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY BAUCH, THAT THE MAYOR BE AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE 16TH AVENUE BRIDGE AND TO EXECUTE AN ELECTRICAL REPAIR AGREEMENT.* Mayor Van Dusen explained that they are waiting for some new language to be added to the agreement on overhead costs. Ross Earnst, Public Works Director, explained that the City is agreeing to pay one -half the cost of the maintenance and operation of the 16th Avenue Bridge. It is estimated to be about $250,000 per year. The City is proposing to King County that the overhead be limited to the level of the County Road Engineer. The City Attorney has reworded the indemnification clause on page 7. Mayor Van Dusen said the changes to the agreement are not available at this time. He postponed consideration for two weeks. 1 • TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING August 7, 1989 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS Auth. Mayor to execute electrical repair agreement (cont.) Ordinance #1528 - Requiring the installation of automatic fire alarm systems in new and existing buildings REPORTS Building Permits MISCELLANEOUS Ordinance #1529 - Providing for issuance & administration of Blanket Tenant Improvement Building Permits The electrical repair agreement is ready to be executed. It is for $10,000. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE ONLY APPROVAL OF THE ELECTRICAL REPAIR AGREEMENT. MOTION CARRIED. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY HERNANDEZ, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wash., requiring the installation of automatic fire alarm systems in new and existing buildings and establishing minimum requirements for fire protection systems in buildings within the City of Tukwila used for assembly, educational, industrial, institutional, mercantile, storage, office, and multi - family dwellings, and repealing Ordinance Nos. 1141, 1199, and 1327 in their entirety, and establishing an effec- tive date. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1528 BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, reported on Building Permit applications. The Bon Marche in Southcenter has been issued a permit for an atrium. With this they are doing almost a total remodel of the store. The Boeing Credit Union Building, South 133rd and Interurban is in the office for review. Construction should start in another month. The south wall for one of the retail buildings on the pond property has been constructed. Along with the brick wall is a rock wall with wire mesh stretched over it. Apparently the weight of this has changed the underground drainage so now instead of having a 13' elevation of the pond, it is up to 14'9 ". This was unexpected. The elevation is now at the outfall. Before construction began the wall was 25' from the edge of the pond. The edge has now moved up to about 6' from the wall. The permit for Burger King is in its final review. It will be located on the Andover West side of the pond development. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney. Colgrove read an ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Wash., providing for the issuance and administration of blanket tenant improvement building permits for qualifying applicants and projects and providing for fees therefor; and establishing an effective date. MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY HARRIS, THAT ORDINANCE NO. 1529 BE ADOPTED AS READ.* MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY STOKNES, THAT THE ORDINANCE BE AMENDED BY ADDING "TENANT IMPROVEMENT" IN THE TITLE SO IT READS "BLANKET TENANT IMPROVEMENT BUILDING PERMITS." MOTION CARRIED WITH DUFFIE VOTING NO. Council Member Moriwaki explained that there should be some written document that outlines what the determination of policies and procedures are and they should be in ordinance form.. •' • TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR MEETING August 7, 1989 Page 6 c 3a 3 MISCELLANEOUS - Cont. Ordinance #1529- He disagrees with this policy; it is unwise and wrong that an Providing for issuance average individual has to go through the permit process to & administration of get their work done, but under this ordinance we would allow Blanket Tenant certain corporations the ability to build first and be Improvement Building accepted later. Laws should apply equally to all. He noted Permits (cont.) two recent articles from the newspaper where buildings were not inspected until after construction. Violations to State Codes were discovered after construction was complete and the work had to be corrected. ADJOURNMENT 9:17 p.m. We are going to allow people to build projects but not have review. We would not allow our residents to do this. He wants "tenant improvements" included to clarify the type of permits. He asked to have the ordinance worded so that no work will be done for any tenant improvement that effects or modifies the structural integrity of the building. Rick Beeler explained that maybe there should be something that makes it more clear that is for trial basis only. The benefit is that the contractor can start work at their own risk. Basically we are talking about non- structural construction. George Hartong, City Attorney, explained that the policy is created for any person that meets the criteria. They can take advantage of this new administrative policy. It is not special legislation. It is not created for a few corporations. None of the requirements of the building code are eliminated. The builder must comply with everything. Only the sequence is changed. It is possible to do some work before the permit is obtained. The applicant must get a permit, no inspections are waived, all requirements must be met. This policy does not sacrifice fire life safety or any of the requirements of the UBC or UFC. *MOTION CARRIED WITH MORIWAKI VOTING NO. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED. Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor Max ne nderson, City Clerk WAC 197 -11 -970 • • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal REZONE FOUR LOTS, 261320 -0046, 0049, 0050, AND 0051 FROM R -1 (SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO M -1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL). Proponent LON A. HALVORSON 12515 WILLOWS ROAD SUITE 170 KIRKLAND, WA 98034 Location of Proposal, including street address, if any LOT 0051 - 4625 S. 134TH STREET; LOTS 0049. 0046 AND 0050 - 4535 S. 135TH STREET, TUKWILA, WA. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -13 -89 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [l There is no comment period for this DNS [] This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by proposal for 15 days from the date belowe lead agency will not act on this Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date L(J-4_ ) / Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.ONS PUBLISH IN THE VALLEY DAILY NEWS ON JUNE 18, 1989 (SUNDAY) City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor June 14, 1989 To: Rick Beeler, Director Department of Community Development From: Lon Halvorson Elling Halvorson 12515 Willows Road Suite 170 Kirkland, WA 98034 Subject: Halvorson Rezone - 89 -7 -R The following are measures that I have agreed to fulfill if the rezone is approved: I Traffic 1. I agree to cooperate with the City in the formation of a Local Improvement District for South 134th South which may involve allowing an easement for the road and sidewalks. 2. No access will be allowed off 135th Place South and as a condition for approval of the rezone, I agree to provide a minimum 40' foot wide access easement to 134th st. or consolidate lots so that access will be limited to S. 134th St. II Earth 1. Landscape buffer (approximately 20 feet deep) will be provided along 135th P1. South and planted with trees and native vegetation. Landscape requirements will be included in the 20' buffer zone. Lon A. Halvorson Elling Halvorson rb /wb HALVORSON PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CO. 12515 Willows Road, Suite 170 Kirkland, Washington, 98034 (206) 821 -2280 TO: LOCATION: FAX N0: FROM: RE:. DATE: TINE SENT: / 2 ; BY: YOUR REF: OUR REF: FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET 3 ?33 _A---z,49Azef SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO ADDRESSEE:- =1,Q7 There are pages, exclu g the cover sheet, with this transmission. If there are any difficulties in transmission, please telephone us at the above number. Cona1 No. Epic rile No. I3-?--) Fee' $100.00 Receipt No. 960(9c'o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Na, 2. Name of applicant: Lon A. Halvorson 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 17515 willowsRrl StP 17n, Kirkland, WA 98034 (20 (4) %21 -zz' o 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule '(including phasing, if applicable): 90 nays 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. It is our intention • •. . - _ i1 • 1 - • _ • _ ■ • G+ _ • - r - t . _ - °a compi shed in the form of an arlditinn to our existing building which is adjacent to the property. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other.. proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Nn • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Standard Building Permit Process. O.' 4.L '�i' G G Is- c ? z o� Ear i , -j--, f 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no-. need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Rezone our Property to form R- lSingle FamilL to M-1-light Industrial so it is cpnsistan with the comprehensive plan and our a j oining=pr-operty. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See attached Leaal Description Parcel A Parcel B ceL A625LSouth 134th -Sty Tukwila, WA B. 4535 South 135th St_ - Tukwila, WA Sce -vae-ini-ty -map 1'; SeP Site plan 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? NO TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC, B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Mostly a gentle slope. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The west side of property slopes very quickly 25% slope. i{tg reET A.i.on3J 6065'r .Rzor. 1-.146. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay, sand, gravel. d.. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NA. f.• Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NA g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? NA 1 . Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NA. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. NA. b. Are .there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NA_ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NA. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. n,,, • 40 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NA. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NA. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NA • b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NA. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NA_ c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. NA Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.NQ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NA_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered ?,_ c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None_ S Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NA. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NA_ • 6. Energy and Natural Resources What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NA. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NA. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Nn_ 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No change. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: NA. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Freeway_traffic. -It 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. NA. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: N11. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Property contains two rentals and vacant land - North is M -1- South is R= 71 7-COIff prehensive pan is RE-1. L4er f n- 1. W Es-r is 5Z, � ft' 1.020 ( 3'S '. µ b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two older houccc one old gag, chop. • 40 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No—Men-A-1- -rLC1 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M -1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NA. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No_ i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? NA- j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NA. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NA. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NA. • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. NA. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NA. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? NA. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NA c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NA, 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? NA. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing . recreational uses? If so, describe.iyQ_ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:NA. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.NA. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NA. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 1 341-h St to S 1111-(-1 to Gtati Rnni , alt to TnterstatP_ b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? 'itan Rl nr'ks c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? NA_ • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private)N°. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: NA. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. NA_ • 16. Utilities •Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilities rrently available at the site: Ctectrici _ ,:�i i y� ale , �use_service;` e_.-ep :one 47anitary se4 septic system, of eer.� b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to mak- its decisio Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. .TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI• D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. Now would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None_ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No effect. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N.A. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? NA_ Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: No change. • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated .(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No change. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No change 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No change. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: NA. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? NA 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Nn r•hanga Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No change • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: NA JO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIES 410 Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? TO Re -zone my property to M -1. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? NnnP_ 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: NA • 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No_ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are:- AAA -23- • Subject Site YERKES & ASSOCIATES LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A. NORTHEAST 252 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 0.86 ACRES OF LOT 14, FOSTORIA GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 9,OF PLATS, 95, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;'.:. EXCEPT THE "NORTH 10 FEET OF_THE NORTHEAST 119.11•:FEET OF. THE SOUTHEAST .86 ACRES'OF•LOT 14.`` .'- SITUATE•aIN THE COUNTY. OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.: i'007zC -mac.- 6ek•• SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IM ANT INFORMATION 1989 REAL EMITE TAX STATEMENT ATE OF WASHINGTION KING COU A PROPERTY OU NUM RHO 500 OUR H"MrSEATTLE WA 98104-2387 ACCOUNT NUMBER N 261320 - 0049 -04 72503A �^ KEEP THIS PORTION BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON - -- HALVORSON ELLING BARBARA 8N2997 - -- 12515 WILLOWS RD NE SUITE 200 KIRKLAND WA 98034 • ;LOT .BLOCK' CODE •• SEC'' TWP.' RD 14 4630 FOSTORIA GARDEN TRS SELY 1.86 AC LESS NELY 252 FT LESS SELY 70 FT THOF PROPERTY ADDRESS 4534 S 135TH ST t't `: CURRENT BIELING •DISTRIBUTION;"; =` State School Support... Local School Support... County City Unincorporated /Road Poil Fire Sewer & /or Water Library Other Emergency Med Svc... Special Assessment ... Surface Water Mgt. . TOTAL CURRENT BILLING 266.81 143.35 139.93 122.34 30.62 73.74 37.77 17.70 29.89 862..a,5 First hall must be paid or postmarked by April 30 or FULL AMOUNT BE- COMES DELINQUENT and accru. interest and penalty as prescribed by law. If first half paid by April 30 second hall must be paid by October 31 Of it becomes delinquent and accrues interest and penalty. FULL AMOUNT MAY BE PAID APRIL 30th SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION PROPERTY TAX RP1O ACCOUNT NUMBER H 261320- 0050 -00 68255A KEEP THIS PORTION BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON HALVORSON ELLING BARBARA PO BOX 97010 KIRKLAND WA 739999 98033 Firs) half must he paid nr postmarked CURRENT.BILLINO'INFORMATION 1. Land Value Improvements Less: Exempt Value TAXABLE VALUE Levy Rate General Tax Special Assessment ... Surface Water . Mgt. TOTAL CURRENT BILLING Omitted Taxes TOTAL CURRENT BILLING INCLUDING OMITS 19,800 51,500 71,300 11.67270 832.26 21,A1 862.15 862-. -r5 YEAR DELINQUENCY INFORMATION IN 1 ERES1 PENAL TY 4/89 swM 3.59 DELINOUENT TOTAL TOTAL.CURRENr ;AND;DELINOUENTS1:` PRINCIPAL 29.89 33.48 895.63 1989 REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT KING COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTION 500 FOURTH AVE, SEATTLE WA 98104 -2387 i'''. ".' %% CURRENT BILLING DISTRIBUTION' •,.. State School Support .. . Local School Support... County City Unincorporated /Road Port Fire Sewer & /or Water Library Other Emergency Med Svc Special Assessment Surface Water Mgt. ... TOTAL CURRENT BILLING 47.15 25.33 24.73 21.62 5.41 13.03 6.68 3.13 ,iBLOCK,COCE ,;SEC';'ITWP,g RO. by April 30 or FULL AMOUNT BE COMES DELINQUENT and accrues Merest and penalty as prescribed by law. If first half paid by April 30 14 4630 second half must be paid by October FOSTORIA GARDEN TRS 31 or it becomes delinquent and SELY 70 FT OF NELY 110 FT OF FOLG accrues interest and penalty. BEG AT NW COR OF 14 TH SELY ALG S FULL AMOUNT MAY BE MGN VALLEY ST 90.94 FT TH SWLY PAID APRIL 30th ALG•LN PLT NWLY LN OF.14 A DIST ETC SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION PROPERTY TAX RHO ACCOUNT NUMBER H 261320- 0046 -07 68254A KEEP THIS PORTION BRING ALL PARTS WHEN PAYING IN PERSON - -- HALVORSON ELLING BARBARA - -- PO BOX 97010 KIRKLAND WA 13 Lb C101..6013E' 739999 98033 FOSTORIA GARDEN TRS 4630 SELY 70 FT LESS NELY 362 FT lCURRENTBILLINGINFORMATION ", 5" Land Value Improvements Less: Exempt Value... . TAXABLE VALUE Levy Rate General Tax Special Assessment .. • Surface Water Mgt. .. . TOTAL CURRENT BILLING • Omitted Taxes TOTAL CURRENT BILLING INCLUDING OMITS 12,600 12,600 11.67270 147.08 147.08 42.08 DELINQUENCY INTEREST PENALTY 04/89_ INFORMATION PRINCIPAL 88 SWM DELINOUENT TOTAL y "` :TOTAL CURRENTS 'O.:NAND•DELINOUENTS'.)a' 20.41 1989 REAL ESTATE TAX STATEMENT KING COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTION 500 FOURTH AVE, SEATTLE WA 98104 -2387 14'`•CURR ENT BIt'LING DISTRIBUTION!` -;'- Slate School Support.. . Local School Supportrt.. County City Unincorporated /Road Port Fire Sower 8r/or Water Library Other Emergency Med Svc Special Assessment Surface Water Mgt. TOTAL CURRENT BILLING' 55.75 29.96 29.24 25.57 6.40 15.41 .7.89 3.70 173.92' First half must be paid or postmarked by April 30 or FULL AMOUNT BE- COMES DELINQUENT and accrues interest and penalty as prescribed by law. If first half paid by April 30. second hall must be paid by October 31 or it becomes delinquent and accrues interest and penally. FULL AMOUNT MAY BE PAID APRIL 30th 145.77 66..18 313.26 '. ! CURRENT BILLING'INFORMATIONW; t Land Value Improvements Less: Exempt Value TAXABLE VALUE Levy Rate General Tax Special Assessment ... Surface Water Mgt TOTAL CURRENT BILLING Omitted Taxes TOTAL CURRENT BILLING INCLUDING OMITS 14,900 14,900 11 67270 173.92 173.92 • 7•173.92 YEAR SWM DELINQUENT TOTAL -' . :. TOTAL_CURRENT,' 11!:2 • • DELINQUENCY INFORMATION • IN TEHEST PENALTY 04/89 1.9 PRINCIPAL 1-.W.799 REZONE APPLICATION 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Rezone our property from R -1 (tingle family), to M -1 (Light Industrial). 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and . nearest intersection) Parcel A 4625 S. 134th St. - Tukwila, WA (See attached legal description) Parcel B 4535 S. 135th St., - Tukwila, WA LSee attached Tax statment) Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Lon A. Halvorson/ Elling Halvorson 3. APPLICANT :* Name: Address: Pho 12515 Willows Road N.E. , Suite 170, Kirkland; WA 98034 (206)82 2280 Signature:; . Halvorson * T e ..plicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding th- application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. Date: 4 -10 -89 4. PROPERTY. OWNER . 7 Parcel AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Name: Elling & Barbara Halvorson Address :12515 Willows Rd. N.E., Ste.170 Kirkland, WA 98034 Phone: 821 -2280 / I /WE,[signature(s)] 4=�' /A 'n�'*s.'..�or El _ swear that e a — ow er s or con purchaser s • the property i •lved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our 5 -1 -89 knowledge and belief. Date: Parcel B Elling Halvorson & Lon A. Halvorsc 12515 Willows RD. NE ste. 170 Kirkland, WA 98034 REZONE APPLICATION Page 2 5. WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE PROPERTY? Both Parcels R -1 6. WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY? Parcel A 18,200 SF. Approx. Parcel B 39,000 SF. Approx. 7. WHAT ZONING CLASSIFICATION IS REQUESTED? M -1 8. WHAT IS THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION? M -1 REZONE CRITERIA: The burden of proof in demonstrating that the change is appropriate lies solely upon the proponent. Generally, the more dramatic the change, the greater will be the burden of showing that the proposed change is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan as implemented by the Zoning Ordinance. The proponent must show in a clear and precise manner why the rezoning application should be granted. The Planning Commission and City Council will review your proposal using the following criteria. You may attach additional sheets and submit other documentation to support your rezone application. 9. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted comprehensive land use policy plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest; riESObilmhe_change in zoning is in conformance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 2. See July 28,1989 letter to Jack Pace Re: Zoning'at annexation. 10. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or -residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form; RESPONSE: At this time we do not have a specific project for us to base a sited,. plan. Our 'wish is to be .consistant with the property we already own(M -1) which abutts the property in question. By obtaining a rezone we wiirl hP ahle to establish our site plan with a use 11. When the request is not in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the applicant shall provide evidence to the City Council's satisfac- tion that there is an additional need for the requested land classification. To respond to this criteria, obtain a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applica- tion and submit in conjunction with Rezone Application. NA REZONE APPLICATION Page 3 12. Significant changes have occurred in the character, conditions or surround- ing neighborhood that justify or otherwise substantiate the proposed rezone. RESPONSE: 1. Much of theimmediate neighorhood has already been developed M -1. 2. Several of the homes in the area are rental and they are not being cared fot the same as owners might. Declining residental neighborhood. 3. The property's proximity to 2 major freeways has created a loud noise area not suitable for residental developement. 13. The proposed rezone is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare as compared to the hardship, such as diminution of property value, imposed on the individual property owner. RESPONSE: This rezone should not be a hardship to anyone. The value of the land exceeds the value of the homes in this area if zoned M -1, which is consistant with the comp- rehensive Plan. New Residental Development in this area would not be in the best interest of public Health, Safety and Welfare because of the freeway noise_ 14. The unimproved subject property is unsuitable for the purpose for which it has been zoned considered in the context of the length of time the property has remained unimproved and land development in the surrounding area. RESPONSE: Industry in the immediate area. Declinning neighborhood - Transition from owner to renters. Noise from freeways. (29 /MB.REZONE) July 28, 1988 Mr. Jack Pace Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Pace: We have just found out that the annexation task force is recommending that the zoning be residential for the area between the existing City limit, 134th Street, 48th Avenue, and 135th Street. Please see the attached map. This property is located next to two major freeways and is extremely noisy. Residential use of this property is poor planning. There is already industry in the area and the boundaries described above are a logical place to have M -1 zoning. We, the undersigned, hereby request that our property be zoned M -1 when annexed to the City of Tukwila. M -1 is consistent with other e properties located in the immediate area which are currently in the City of Tukwila, as well as follows the existing comprehensive plan of this City. Respectfully Submitted, Elling Halvor Ted Linde Ri har Baren MY 4k34/(/ Ronald Orn ,A7-- ,o,G•„ r O Go r/e- zo- /-"e/L �jv�2 T' . /Ir% 2.4% / /s-✓6 Paul Sanders y6— !f// /0 02 rf /,rboz .7").5%.7 #1.'c.T4 -' 7_ Bill Turner SUB DATE e47 PAGE , I N ?e tac e.c.- - 8 -- S;acx L A 4-- 9.33 Cr i0