HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-15-90 - CITY OF TUKWILA - 1991-1996 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMTRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
1991 -1996
EPIC -15 -90
,.
F, BTATF pw S-��
f g7IN71r
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY NOV 16 1990
Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8711 • (206) 59-6000
November 13, 1990
Mr. Rick Beeler
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Beeler:
We received the determination of nonsignificance for the pro-
posed Transportation Improvement Program for 1991 -1996. Al-
though there is no comment period on the DNS, we would like
to note the following concerns.
Based on information provided in the checklist, it appears
that wetlands are present on the site. A qualified consult-
ant should be hired to delineate the wetland boundaries using
the new federal wetlands delineation methodology. A report
should be prepared that includes information on the functions
and values provided by the wetland, and the potential impacts
to these functions resulting from the proposed project.
Project design should avoid or minimize impacts to the wet-
land where possible. Proposed mitigation to compensate for
unavoidable impacts should be included in the wetland report.
Placement of any fill in wetlands may require a permit from
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant should con-
tact the Corps to determine whether a permit is needed.
All direct impacts to wetlands should be avoided. If the
project will result in unavoidable wetland impacts, a mitiga-
tion plan should be prepared which addresses the following
components: Goals and objectives, construction plan, hydrol-
ogy plan, revegetation plan, contingency plan, monitoring
plan, bonding, and buffers. Ecology recommends using the
following acreage replacement ratios in determining minimum
compensation for unavoidable losses:
2.0:1.0 for Forested Wetlands
1.5:1.0 for Scrub Shrub Wetlands
1.25:1.0 for Emergent Wetlands
These ratios are to be used for calculating the area of
wetlands to be created. The area should be doubled for en-
hancement of existing wetlands.
3
Letter to Mr. Beeler
November 13, 1990
'Page 2
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Bill Leonard of
the Wetlands Program at (206) 438 -7161.
Sincerely,
T <rdit■t
Barbara J. itchie
Environmental Review Section
BJR:
6291
cc: Bill Leonard
WAC 197 -11 -970
•
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of Proposal City Of Tukwila „Transportation Improvement Program (1991- 1996).
Proponent City of Tukwila's Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila,
WA 98188
Location of Proposal, including street address, if any Portion within the City limits.
(see maps Sections, TWN 23, RGE. 4.
Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC 15 -90
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. -An environmental impact statement
(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after
review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS
[� This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by
. The lead agency will not act on this .
proposal for 15 days from the date below.
Responsible Official Rick Beeler
Position /Title Planning Director
Phone 433 -1846
Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, 9: 88
Date 311 l f'PD Signature
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written
appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be
required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and
Planning Department.
FM.DNS
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -0179
Ross A. Earnst, P.E. Director
M E M O R A N D U M
October 12, 1990
FR: Doug Micheau, Public Works Coordinato
TO: Jack Pace, Senior Planner
RE: SEPA Checklist for 1991 -1996 Transportation Improvement Plan
(TIP).
Enclosed for your review and comment is a revised and expanded SEPA
Checklist for the 91 -96 TIP. The Checklist is in handwritten form
pending your comments. Once we have your comments we will edit the
form and enter it into the computer to be updated from year to
year.
If you have any questions or require further detail on a specific
area please let me know.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ROUT AG G FoilVl
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I
TO G Building I Planning 1TPub Wks
EPIC: -
Fire n Police ,Parks /Rec
PROJECT —�'
Ci iy D� Tithe )/1/4 (`7; 2, /?)
ADDRESS C/ km/ 4.5
DATE TRANSMITTEDA5 /9e.) RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7/2/
STAFF COORDINATOR J, /94-f,z) 6Z DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. •
ITEM COMMENT
or
(aea
Comments prepared by_,
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
ROUTING FORM
EPIC: - e/e)
PROJECT cis, 291c Triked)41
ADDRESS 2/47,43-
DATE TRANSMITTED a/2.3-bd
STAFF COORDINATOR 2.19446.71)
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 94bei
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file Is available in the Planning Department through the above staff •
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM
COMMENT
Comments prepared by: (
09/14/89
.
. .. .
... ' .
Building
riPlanning
2:Pub Wks
13tFire
E Police
Parks/Flea ..
.
PROJECT cis, 291c Triked)41
ADDRESS 2/47,43-
DATE TRANSMITTED a/2.3-bd
STAFF COORDINATOR 2.19446.71)
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 94bei
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file Is available in the Planning Department through the above staff •
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM
COMMENT
Comments prepared by: (
09/14/89
1
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
RouTWG FORM
Planning XPub Wks.
PROJECT e/9, D1 7zm »Z4 fr;
ADDRESS C//y
DATE TRANSMITTED a/5 -#d
STAFF COORDINATOR D neead ‘e)/240,/,
EPIC: -
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 94/925
DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED
The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and
comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The
environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff
coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission,
Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below.
ITEM COMMENT
N o &O vn ni
Date: C73 yr q Comments prepared by ,
09/14/89
A. BACKGROUND
Conte No.
Epic File No. _ /S- -y''
Fee $100.00 Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
CITY Dr 7c w /4-,a 5/x 44-e
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:%, WSPo 774 -TioA) fpg,ovEN6NT' a todte4A4/'m--9)
2. Name of app1icant:C /TY of 27we&J /4-04 1)S•0;: dFA.6L /c I- e) 4e4-1-
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P-on-. Gar..-
630o So1.c rHCE.urFe &vv/ Tiextd /LA 4'3.3 N 79 13, {. ,_ s k- f +d
4. Date checklist prepared: 6 -2/-90
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 77400.1/c,.4 C /TY
CmtuJG /L Apepflew of S/c r8.41e T/P 6Y •TuLY // /99o.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. YeS/ iii Six -sy,G
T/P /s u1447U' 4un iTs° l�� wiokl uY /N o,e44+uca au <5 43ura2Y
REOu/R5 T %'s is 4 wee) f arEcrrnpas,4c.. 7.1fre E' t, TS of ereo/a e_
4fle Coz.s-/s/ cJT 01?N 4.'Vb S GE. 4 JT C/rs fP' %i[ &J/ S an/W. ,t sj vE
440t1b use ft J a ,s7zKGlr6, Q SI4/i4GTS .T 7 FdJUI gtie 1 T
14/ /44. �E' £d,¢LU4 rso .47- 4 44—•e D..1Z //oe To A/$ 7,21.1G770
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEE Q.7. Swil /A,rJm6,V1,- Chile t. /,�5,
s. - sot rs 14#JA r Ts LS, z. 16,-.4) to /woo - x#44 o riee
careers.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
exp 1 a i n . SSe A. 7 ofpoprez• ?/P Rev/SW * 85'4(7 4cEA T �7'uewsA/c77c()$.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
Cirr laauck. 4 topnemI
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
Seg. 4.7.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
Wawa) 7705 GTi' 444 ,rs Ave /j,.'6 01044 &‘44/444Y %12. % C,TY.
Sf• �.7
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
44% Sg05
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
CIA ees "gat . STf.EP %� reAr 1'4"E)' A404
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? 2.610 Z
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.Au. 7 '.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Yom.Sxe 4..
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. SEE 4.7.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
co struction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Mme. Se 4.7.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? (,[,UjN,&ij. s664,7.
•
II, Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: c,E 4,7
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
.gE 4.7
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe. Ja5 4.7
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any: see A 7
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into. 5, ® —/ 7 SVO
Aga Tr tail`,+ RAM ct)/ir"y w am 7
_clseEE) i •
IIIEvaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans. its, ..52r45 A7
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material. 5kr. c 4.7 f 4. F.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpo e, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. f , GC06 A,7 i¢ 4 /,
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. AS. Jff 14.7 ore
e
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. 4/o.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. SiE, 4, 7 r 4.d
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve. 11/4. 45...
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.,2 ,4.7 f4.8
•
III Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.] 565
A.-7 fA.do
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
gr und, and runoff water impacts, if any: ,sue 47
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
//deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
/evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
/shrubs
/grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
_ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? ,e ,f.7 r`A•cf
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.545 A,7(4 /.
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: � �,7 4.1.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site. <25 ..4 7 r A.,
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. YES. S 4.7 cf.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: Jae! q, 7 f Ar.r
•
6. Energy and Natural Resources
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
12#ueiLY etzcate / l/ tae. Sz Z/6/irs .uv
/c- (.5i6A4 s. S 7 7' of. 1.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. /4.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduc or control energy
impacts, if any: , c6 A7 f 4.c9.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result f this proposal? If so,
describe._, 4, 7 �,¢. 9
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required. SAE 4.-7 sy At.d=.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: S,e 47le 1.6
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)? ,rte A.7 lit 4.4
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
11,7 ,4 (9.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: 37674 A.7t4 e
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? .45 X1.7 4. d
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. ,E A.7' Ad
c. Describe any structures on the sites" "47,4.4
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
,S2 . 4.7 e 4„f
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? c$$.E ' 7 fq.d
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Jas 4.7 f 4. d'
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? SEE et.7 4?
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
' 4.7 4.8
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project? Ake/4E ,4.7 q'01.g
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? '4L) . E. 4.7,4.d1
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any: fez 4.7 ?
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: ski. A.7 ?At..6
•
9. Housing
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing? 1U,,At .SFE At 7 f4,4.,
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing. .a f 4 6
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: AX2411.1. 45 .41,7414425
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Y .4.7(A.8
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed? Sf,E 47 9,48
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any: ,05 Ar,7 .f,. 8
• III Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views? _20E 4.7
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal? S 4, 7 1%40.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any: SSE A 7 9 ,1 8.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tu ities are in the immediate vicinity? J , Alf ,7
f Aye.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe. S2 4.7 9`
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
.mot V AB.
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe. A. 7 f 4g
b. Generally describe 'any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
S A7 ,.8.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any: SEE ,40.7 s.8
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.257545
4.7q`Arg.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? 614W ES . SSE ,4, 7yie9.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate? i/,OP./ S.
Ste. 0.7'
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(i dicate whether public or private). S; Sf� 4.7
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe. f 25,x-. ,.SR.e. A4.77/-149.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. 5?j5 47 9`,¢.6
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any: ,S 7 fa,c
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe..SEe A.7 .144.8.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any. 47f1.6
•
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
_afeGes 1A-se-4 ,, 10 44-7-49, J . 4 Z 14 e.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
A9, 4t,
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency
relying on them to makes its dey)'sion.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
is
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• TO. BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. Now would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise? j4 y 4/4et To .Z0c4tEWs 45 Ufa- a0= /
%oVe -, �s 4.7 ,��.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
see 17l4.8
2. How would the proposal be likely to affe t plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life? 47445 4.7
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are: 4.7q`■0-8.
•
0 .Evaluation for
3. How would the proposal be likel to deplete energy or
natural resources? 1;7 fI.8.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
c
natural resourses are: Osizirm Q7 A,7 f4.$.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or rime
farmlands? 674040L 114)14k6GY. SAPL 4 '7 Ave
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are: ,51:4 4,7 ' 4f,8.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans? .5 A/F e /14
Agency Use Only
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area: .S A 7 It r
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan? ( A 575 -reNT See A.7 f 4,49.
6. Now would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities? -. '.s
14 SW- A) /S 75 o ,5120319A02 -r
THE ,O4 2 ooP ampez A)s'itie / -aGieY R- J AND
.RAJ ,¢N D OF Tftt,i sew-Jigs L14T ce44 -SL
Dg.9460141. 5 44(.5 ~- 7.477D41/ RA04,G tewe.45S�
4074/276„25.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are: A% %.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. SEE 4 7 q'4.f.
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Usk Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? p,
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: i% /t-
• TO, BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA
IIIEvaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 4pr- ,4
Zri SPoL7 -77o sl .7 Ve-"NLL4UT PAec4 444 /A)
AftzapAck74!... co,TA' 7Z 2 -Y pf�cugerce-F- urs
X401 zSu-pp r 7E C®i P•e4h 4us y c' /2 J.
2. What are the Alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? AJoNC.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action: N /A...
1 •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? ,(J
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: A1,4,
-23-
Control No.
Epic File No.
Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ,44 0C, l
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
City of Tukwila Six -year Transportation Improvement Program (91 -96)
2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 101, Tukwila, WA 98188; 433 -0179;
Ross Earnst, Ron Cameron, Brian Shelton
4. Date checklist prepared: 6/21/90
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Projects in the T.I.P. will be scheduled for construction over the six year
period 1991 through 1996.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, the T.I.P. is updated annually to reflect changing priorities, completed
projects, and changing needs in the area of transportation improvements.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or
will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
A SEPA checklist will be completed prior to construction of each scheduled -
project in the T.I.P. In addition, E.I.S. documentation may be prepared on
specific projects which are likely to generate adverse environmental impacts
as determined necessary upon review of the project SEPA checklists.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of
other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?
If yes, explain.
It is likely that applications by private developers are pending approval for
many areas adjacent to the properties described in the proposal; however, the
extent of such actions are not known. This proposal is directly related to
the T.I.P.•s being developed by adjacent jurisdictions in that each
jurisdiction submits their T.I.P. for review by the others.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your
proposal.
Adoption by Tukwila City Council and three to four shoreline permits for
specific projects. In addition, individual SEPA checklists will be completed
as required for individual projects.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in
this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.
You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a
complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposal and
should not be summarized here.
The proposal is a planning document describing 56 street improvement projects
which will be constructed in whole or in part during the next six years within
the City of Tukwila. These projects range from minor intersections to major
construction projects involving arterial realignments.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street
address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the
site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available. while you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The planning document addresses projects disbursed widely throughout the
jurisdictional area of the City of Tukwila.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive
Land Use Policy Plan-Map as environmentally sensitive?
Approximately seven of the proposed projects may include portions of areas
determined to be environmentally sensitive.
•
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
Terrain varies from flat to hilly with some steep
slopes within the City.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)?
200%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Soils vary among specific projects but are
predominantly woodinville series.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
Yes, there are several specific locations in the City
where landslides have occurred in the past.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate
quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indicate source of fill.
Filling and grading is typical of major street
improvement projects; however, such activities are
limited to the extent necessary to achieve
established design standards.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction,or use? If so, generally describe.
Yes, however erosion will be locally contained and
project specific with control measures required as
project construction contract requirements.
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
All specific project sites will end up as 100%
impervious surfaces; as a portion of total area
within the City; the amount is less than 10% and the
changes to this represented by the specific projects
is negligible.
g-
•
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
Specifications and drawings for construction of all
projects wills reflect the provisions of the land -
altering ordinance and standards whose intent is to
control erosion and impacts from erosion.
2. Air
a.
What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Construction exhausts will be negligible and to the
extent that the specific projects enhance the flows
of traffic the impacts of motorists' emissions will
be reduced.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
Construction with heavy equipment will be minimized
to the extent necessary to complete the job.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including your -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
There are approximately seven projects which
could potentially impact the Green River or its
tributaries. Specific impacts will be assessed
on a case by case basis through individual
checklists submitted in accordance with SEPA.
• •
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
There are approximately seven projects which
will occur near or over watercourses: 2, 17,
28, 41, 55; 14
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
This element will be assessed on a case by case
basis through expanded SEPA checklists.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate
quantities, if known.
Surface water system improvements will occur
concurrently with many of the specific projects
and will receive specific attention in the SEPA
checklist for each project. Most surface water
projects are also addressed in the
comprehensive surface water plan.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
A number of the projects may be in the 100 -
year floodplain, however, the actual finished
elevations are not known at this time.
Improvements that are in the floodplain will
include floodproofing design components.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
No
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Evaluation for
Agency. Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water
be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate
quantities, if known.
No
2) Describe waste materials that will be
discharged into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, if any (for example:
Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.)
Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses
to be served (if applicable), or the number of
animals or humans the system(s) are expected
to serve.
None
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Projects in the six year plan require inclusion
of storm water system components to deal with
runoff from the improved surfaces as well as
accommodation of upstream flows generated by
impervious surfaces. Pipes, ditches, swales
and natural water courses will all be utilized
as design components to convey surface water
to the Green River.
• •
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
Yes. During asphalt paving petroleum emulsions
could enter surface waters. This is unlikely
since paving does not generally occur during
rainy periods or periods of flooding. In
addition, contractors performing asphalt paving
are required to clean up spills of any
substances. Finally, where possible, swales
will be used as bifiltration to remove
contaminants prior to outfalls in the Green
River.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts,if any:
The City is currently working to adopt a land -
altering and a surface water . management ordinance.
Both of these ordinances address the mitigation of
impacts to surface and ground water systems. The
standards likely to be adopted in conjunction with
these ordinances are already being utilized in the
review of street improvement designs. Specific
project impacts will be assessed on a case -by -case
basis through SEPA checklists.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
x deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
x evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
x shrubs
x grass
pasture
crop or grain
x wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk
cabbage, other (some)
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
Removal of vegetation will be limited to only those
portions of the right -of -ways necessary,to construct
the improvements. In addition, vegetation is
reestablished as a standard practice on roadsides to
prevent erosion and enhance aesthetic appeal.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None known.
-8-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
All street improvements include design requirements
which utilize existing vegetation or provide new
vegetation to stabilize roadsides; enhance aesthetic
appeal; and provide visual and /or noise buffers.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds of animals which have been observed
on or near the site or are known to be on or near the
site:
birds: hawk, heron, songbirds, migratory water fowl
mammals: beavers, raccoons, squirrels, small rodents
fish: trout, perhaps some freshwater mussels in
watercourses
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
Yes. Waterfowl utilize wetlands and the Green River
in the City as part of their migratory path. Also,
fish migrate through the City up the Green River.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
Projects are assessed individually with SEPA
checklists to determine the least impact
alternatives. In addition the City is currently
working to adopt a sensitive areas ordinance which
will require buffers and stringent development
standards to mitigate impacts to wildlife.
• •
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be
used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electricity will be used for the lights associated
with specific improvements. Petroleum based products
will be used as construction material as well as to
operate construction equipment but these are one-
time uses and do not represent an ongoing demand.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
Low electricity lights are used whenever possible,
Also,s the increased flow capacities of improved
streets will reduce full consumption by motorists
utilizing these routes; where possible, recycled
materials will be utilized for construction of
improvements.
7. Environmental Health
a.
Are there any environmental health hazards, including
exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
In that transport of materials will occur on
completed improvements; spill potentials exist as
well as potential fires and explosions. In that
improvements also increase safety, these risks will
be reduced. Some possibilities exist for spills
during construction of petroleum -based products.
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
Only routine fire, police, and first -
aid /ambulance capacities.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control
environmental health hazards, if any:
Limited work hours (daytime) to mitigate noise
disturbance to local residences. WISHA
standards will be observed to protect workers
during construction.
-10-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
Traffic noise already exists in most areas
where improvements will occur.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or long -term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what
hours noise would come from the site.
Construction noise will occur on a short -term
basis during daytime hours. Traffic noise will
occur on a long -term basis with peak noise
periods in the mornings and early evenings.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
Construction will be restricted to daytime
hours. Traffic noise will be mitigated where
possible with roadside vegetation.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
Specific improvement projects will occur in areas
already utilized for motorist transportation.
Adjacent uses range from recreational to commercial
with the predominant use being commercial.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
No, not within the past decade.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Most projects will occur where existing road surfaces
already exist.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Road surfaces may be demolished in some areas prior
to construction of improvements.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site?
Varies throughout the City.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site?
g-
Varies
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
Varies
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
°environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
Yes, some specific projects occur adjacent to or
through designated sensitive areas and will be
regulated with stringent standards to protect such
areas.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
None
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
Not applicable
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is
compatible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
T.I.P. review by adjacent jurisdictions as well as
design review of each project by city planning staff
and responsible SEPA officials.
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a.
Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -income
housing?
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be
eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
Not applicable
10.Aesthetics
a.
What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Finished structures will consist of road surfaces or
either ACP or PC.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered
or obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
Roadside landscaping and /or utilization of existing
vegetation as specific project design elements.
•
11.Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
product? What time of day would it mainly occur?
Generally, all street improvements will reflect some
light during mid -day of sunny periods as well as
reflecting artificial light at night during rainy
periods.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
Negligible safety hazard and will not interfere with
views.
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
Light standards will be rough - surfaced to minimize
reflected light. Also,vegetation along street
improvements will help mitigate impacts of glare and
reflected light.
12.Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities
are in the immediate vicinity?
There are several formal and informal recreation
areas along the Green River for: access, running,
cycling, walking, and fishing.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Whenever possible, specific projects include design
elements for trails or park access and /or parking.
• •
13.Historic and Cultural Preservation
a.
Are there any places or objects listed on, or
proposed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
Not applicable.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed access to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
This proposal represents a six -year improvement plan
for the integrated roadway system both within and
outside the city limits of Tukwila.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
c.
Yes, varies considerably.
How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
Varies considerably. The element will be addressed
on a project by project basis through SEPA
checklists.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
This proposed represents a six -year transportation
improvement plan focusing efforts on the development
of existing roadways.
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
The proposed area (city limits) contains many
railroad lines.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
g-
Varies by project and will be assessed on a project
basis through SEPA checklists.
Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any:
Proposal will enhance transportation throughout the
City.
15.Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
In that road surface areas are increased by
improvements and new street appurtenances are
installed, public maintenance of these improvements
must likewise increase.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts
on public services, if any.
Many high maintenance areas will receive improvement
thus offsetting the efforts which would increase due
to increased maintenance required by additional area
and appurtenances.
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16.Utilities
a.
Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Varies by specific project, however, generally all
utilities are available throughout the affected
geographic area.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in the
immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Varies considerably by project and will be assessed
through individual project SEPA checklists prior to
construction.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on
them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
• •
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
.proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at
a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented.
Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to
water; emissions to air; production, storage,or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Increased road surface areas will likely generate increased
surface water runoff to the Green River for projects
involving street widening. Increased vehicular traffic
flows will likely increase emissions but this may be a net
decrease when compared with emissions generated in areas
currently suffering from heavy congestion.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Use of swales and stormwater collection facilities will aid
in dealing with runoff. Improvements are designed to
increase traffic flows, thus allowing for more efficient
burning of petroleum fuels.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals,
fish, or marine life?
Generally affects to flora and fauna will be minimal. In
a few areas where direct contact with watercourses occurs,
impacts may be greater and will have to be assessed through
further environmental review.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,
fish, or marine life are:
Restricting clearing of vegetation to only that area
necessary to complete improvements. Also, all improvements
will be designed and constructed in accordance with
sensitive area ordinance standards as well as mitigating
measures prescribed in the land - altering, stormwater
management, and tree preservation ordinances.
-18-
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
The construction of specific projects will utilize some
fossil fuels and products but the effects in terms of
depletion are negligible.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural
resources are:
Environmentally conscious design and construction under the
constraints of City and State or federal regulations.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such
as parks, wilderness,wild and scenic rivers, threatened or
endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites,
wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The effects of the proposal in the areas listed above is
negligible when considered in total.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or
reduce impacts are:
As stewards of these resources the City of Tukwila promotes
and observes policies developed specifically to preserve
and protect these resources. In addition, the City solicits
public input on improvement proposals and enlists the
cooperation of state and federal regulatory agencies at
the design stages.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, including whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing
plans?
In that some specific projects occur along the Green River,
provisions have been made to enhance access and in some
cases extend existing waterfront trail systems.
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use
impacts are:
Adherence at the project level to vegetative buffer
requirements and /or prohibition of work in especially
sensitive areas. Each project will be assessed for such
potential impacts through the SEPA process.
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
Just fine, thank you. This proposal is consistent with
existing plan.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
This proposal is aimed at improving transportation and
alleviate existing demand conditions. The effect on
utilities is negligible.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
Not applicable.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
This proposal will not conflict with laws'at any level. If
conflicts arise regarding a specific project, the conflicts
will be resolved through project alternatives or mitigation
measures.
• •
Evaluation for
Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies
of the Plan?
No
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are:
Internal review of preliminary design proposals by City
officials responsible for administering the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan.
• •
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental
information provided and the submitted plans, documents,
supportive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objectives of the proposal?
Provide a comprehensive long -range plan for maximizing the
use of public dollars in the utilization of transportation
routes for the City of Tukwila and adjacent jurisdictions;
while preserving the natural environment and addressing
public needs for access and safety.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
No alternatives to this approach have been identified.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
Not applicable.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan?
No
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(si are:
this plan and the specific projects it represents are
reviewed at the preliminary design stages by officials
responsible for administering the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan. Also, staff developing this proposal are aware of
the contents of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and used
it as a guideline during proposal development.
SI1 YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF 701811A HEARING DATE 06 /18/90
CITY N0. 1320 ADOPTION DATE 06 /25/90
COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1490
Page 1
F;
U; PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FEDERAL
P M C N;
R F A A D; OBLIGATION PLAN
1 U JO R I;
0 NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
R CL R Y 6; SOURCE OF FUNDS ,
I TA W TOTAL 0 ; FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES 2ND
T IS CO WORK V S; ; TOTAL ; 150 YR;
Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK 0S LR LN6TH E T; ; THRU
N AK CODE R A; ' 3RD & ; 5TH k ; ; ANNUAL;
N A S T; 1ST ' 2ND ; 4TH : 6TH ; LOCAL ;RAP /UAB;FEDERAL;; ; 6TH
0 L S X U; YEAR ; YEAR ; YEARS ; YEARS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ;; ; ELEMT.;
S; 1991 ; 1992 : 93 -94 ; 95 -96 ; „ ; YEARS
01 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD 85-8802 16 1 ABDF 0.28 X P $2,350 $3,775 $2,051 $8,176 $1,312 $3,029 $3,835 P.E. $18 $250
68th Ave. S. - Grady Way Bridge R/W $520
Widen to 5 lanes on new alignment with new bridge over 6reenRiver, structure CONST. $100 $3,065
undercrossing 1 -405 ramps, new signal and channelization at Interurban Ave.
$ TOTAL $118 $3,835
02 WEST VALLEY HWY (SR 181) @ S. 180TH STREET 84 -R840 16 2 ABDF 0.42 X P $1,400 $8,000 $9,400 $1,916 $7,150 $334 P.E.
W. Valley Hwy @ S. 180th 11/8
Short -term signal modification, channelization, bridge widening. Long -term CONST. $334
urban interchange with W. Valley overpass over S. 180th.
t TOTAL $334 $0
03 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 84 -RW41 14 2 ABDF 0.91 X P $2,956 $2,956 $916 $2,040 P.E.
52nd Ave. S. - 42nd Ave. S. R/W
Reconstruct to 5 lanes including curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage, CONST.
channelization, traffic signals, lighting, signs, landscaping.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
04 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH 90 -RW02 14 2 ABDF 1.93 X P $1,000 $3,500 $2,500 $7,000 $1,400 $5,600 P.E. $0
Boeing Access Rd - North City Limit R/W $0
Design and construct widening, drainage, traffic signals, utility CONST. $0
undergrounding, lighting, sidewalks, including Boeing Access Rd. intersection.
t TOTAL $0 $0
05 KLICKITAT DRIVE 86-RWO2 19 3 ABDF 0.30 X P $185 $185 $185 - P.E.
53rd Ave. - I -5 Overpass R/W
Design and construct southbound left turn lane,new sidewalk,drainage, and CONST.
lighting.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
06 42ND AVENUE S. AND 40TH AVENUE S. 90- 17 3 ABDF 1.93 P $255 $2,950 $3,205 $641 $2,564 P.E.
S. 164th St. - S. 131st War R/W
Design and construct paving, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, lighting, CONST.
utility undergrounding. Coordinate City of SeaTac.
2 TOTAL $0 $0
07 SOUTHCENTER BLVD AT I -5 /I -405 RAMPS 88 -8808 16 6 HIK 0.50 P $35 $300 $335 $95 $240 P.E.
61st Ave. - I -5 R/W
Design and construct channelization, intersection, and free -way ramp CONST.
improvements. Coordinate with WSDOT HOV project.
2 TOTAL $0 $0
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE 06/18/90
CITY N0. 1320 ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
COUNTY N0. 17 RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Pace 2
F;
U; PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FEDERAL
P M C N;
R F A A 0; OBLIGATION PLAN
I U JO R I;
0 NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
R CL R Y 6; SOURCE OF FUNDS ,
I TA W TOTAL 0 ; FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES ' 2ND
T IS CO WORK V S; ; TOTAL ; 1ST YR;
Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LN6TH E T; ; THRU
N AK CODE R A; : 3RD & ; 5TH & ; ANNUAL;
N A 5 T; 1ST ; 2ND ; 4TH ; 6TH ; ; LOCAL ;RAP /UAB;FEDERAL;; ' 6TH
0 L 5 X U; YEAR ; YEAR ; YEARS ; YEARS FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ;; ELEMT.;
S; 1991 ; 1992 ; 93 -94 ; 95-96 ; „ ; YEARS
08 BRIDGE REPAIR /REPLACEMENT 89 -RW16 4 L X P 3100 3400 $1,180 $1,200 $2,880 $2,880 P.E.
Existing bridges in City. RIO
Evaluate, design, and contruct repairs and replacements. 42nd Ave.(S 133rd), CONST.
42nd Ave.(Duwamish River), 51st Ave (5. 154th), etc.
t TOTAL $0 30
09 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 6 HIJK X P $120 3480 $960 3960 $2,520 31,920 $600 F.E. 518 $90
Various City locations. RIM
Design and construct improvements and new signals. Andover Park E @ Minkler, CONST. $82 $410
Andover Park East @ Baker, S. 130th @ SR 99, etc.
t TOTAL $100 $500
10 STREET OVERLAY AND REPAIR PROGRAM 5 BDE P 3750 3750 $1,500 $1,500 54,500 $4,500 P.E.
Various city streets. RIM
CON5T.
t TOTAL $0 $0
11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER REPLACEMENT 89 -RW09 6 I P $115 $115 $230 $230 $690 $690 P.E.
Various existing signal controller locations R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 50
12 SIDEWALK PROGRAM 85 -8905 9 A6N X P $375 $375 $375 $1,125 $1,125 P.E.
Various city streets. R/W
Design and construct sidewalk and pedestrian walkway improvements throughout CONST.
city.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
13 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM 88 -R902 6 I 10.00 X P $50 $380 $740 $1,170 $1,170 P.E.
All traffic signals R/9
Install signal interconnect system w /master controller. CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
14 TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 6 HJKN X P $150 $150 $300 $300 $900 8900 P.E.
Varicus city streets. R/W
Barrier, channelization, signing, minor widening, lighting S. 135th Place, 50th CONST.
Place @ S. 124th, S. 178th, etc.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITYiCOUNTY CITY OF 'TUKWILA
CITY NO. 1320
COUNTY N0. 17
HEARING DATE 06 /19!90
ADOPTION GATE 06/25/90
RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 7, 1990
Tae
P
R
0
R
Y
4
0
F;
U;
1 N;
F A A D;
U JO R 1;
PROJEC1 +-OPT:: IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
CL R Y G;
TA N TOTAL 0 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES
IS CO WORK V S;
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK 0S LR LNSTH E T;
N AK CODE R A;
A 5 T; 1ST
L S X U; YEAR
S; 1991
2ND
YEAR
1992
; 3RD & ; 5TH &
4TH ; 6TH
; YEARS ; YEARS
93 -94 95 -96
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS
; LOCAL ;RAP /UAB;FEDERAL;;
FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ;;
FEDERAL
OBLIGATION PLAN
2'10
191 YP.;
THRU
ANNUAL;
6TH
ELEMT.;
YEARS
15 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 84 -4106 14 4 ABDF 1.36 X 0
5. 139th St. - Southcenter Blvd.
Design and reconstruct 5 -lane improvements including paving,curb and gutter,
sidewalks, utility undergrounding, lightirgiandscaping, bikepath.
16 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH 89 -RWO5
Boeing Access Rd. - S. 112th Street
Reconstruct to 5 -lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage,lanascape. and
illumination.
$2,430 $2.174 34,604 $921 $3,683
14 2 ABDF 0.40 X P $20 $25 $800
17 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 37 -RW18
Southcenter Blvd. - Grady Nay
Design and construct safety and capacity improvements.
lB RAILROAD XIN6 RESURFACING PROGRAM 87 -RW14
All RR zings in CBD.
Design and construct at -grade surface improvements of exist -ing RR rings.
14 2 ABDF 0.30 P $20 $345
5 08D 0.04 X P $94 $30 $65
19 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 94 -RW19
West Mall Access - S. 168th
Design and construct safety and capacity improvements.
20 CHRISTENSEN ROAD 84-R144
Andover Park East - 900 feet south.
Design and construct street and trail improvements including cul -de -sac in
conjunction with T -Line bridge replacement and Green River dike improvements.
16 2 ABD& 0.20 X P $60 4345
19 3 ABDF 0.17 X P $265
21 WEST VALLEY HI &HWAY (SR 181) 24 -RW31
1 -405 - Strander Blvd.
Widen from 6 to 7 lanes with signal codifications ? 2 inter- sections.
14 2 ABDF 0.42 X P $47 $230 $300
$845 4169 4676
$365 $89 $276
$189 $189
4405 $81 $324
$265 $265
$577 $577
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
41W
CONST.
t TOTAL 30 $0
P.E.
R/1
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.F.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONS ?.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA
CITY N0. 1320
COUNTY N0. 17
HEARING DATE 06 /18/90
ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Page 4
P
R
0
R
T
Y
N
0
F A
_U _JO.._
NC OF
CL R
TA N
F;
C H;
A D;
- R I:
R N;
Y 6;
TOTAL 0 ;
IS CO WORK V S;
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LNSTH E T;
PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
EXPENDITURE PLAN
FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES
__N _ AK CODE ...... R A; . _ __. _;; 3RD & : 5TH &
A S T; 1ST ; 2ND ; 4TH ; 6TH
L S X U; YEAR ; YEAR ; YEARS ; YEARS
__ ... _ . ___. S; 1991 . ; 1992 ;: 93 -94 ; 95 -96
SOURCE OF FUNDS
TOTAL
LOCAL ;RAP /UAB;FEDERAL;;
FUNDS ; FUNDS : FUNDS ; FUNDS ;;
oe
ft
re
FEDERAL
OBLIGATION PLAN
2ND
1ST YR;
THRU
ANNUAL;
6TH
ELEMT.;
_ ; YEARS
22 ANDOVER PARK EAST 90 -88 16 2 ABDF 1.39 U $150 11,900
Tukwila Parkway - S. 180th St.
Design and construct widening to 5 -lanes including paving, drainage, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, channelization, sig- naffs, lighting, signing.
23 STRANDER BLVD. EXTENSION 86 -RW03 1 ABDF 0.28 X P
W. Valley Hwy (S.R. 181) - Oakesdale (Renton) '
New 5 -lane arterial with separated grade crossing railroad
project w /Renton)
24 58TH AVENUE SOUTH 84 -8834 .. ..
Strander Blvd - S. 168th Street
New 4 -lane street with new signal 8 Strander Blvd.
$2,050 $410 $1,640
$5 $561 $8,039 $8,605 $1,725 $6,880
tracks.:.(joint .;..___ . _...._
. 1 ABDF. 0.26 X. U .. $25 . .
25 57th AVENUE SOUTH ( SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY) 84 -8837 - 16 2 ABDF
S. 180th St. - South City Limits
Design and construct widening to 4 o 5 lanes including paving, drainage,
and gutter, sidewalks, channelization, lighting, utility undergrounding.
$1,800 . $1,825 .$1,825
0.50 X U
_ _ 26 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 87 -RWO3 .__,:__.:... r: w :, 16__.6 . HIK._:1.00 X..P _._.$150 .$150
S. 168th - S. 180th St.
Design and construct traffic signals, pedestrian crossings, and combine
_. _ driveways. . w:*
27 ANDOVER PARK WEST 88 -RN04 ' 17 2 'ABDF 21:39 X P. $150 - $900 $1,000
Tukwila Parkway - S..1BOth st. _ ... - .. ......
Design and construct widening to 5 lanes including paving, drainage, curb_ and
gutter, sidewalks, channelization,signals, lighting, signing."
28 SOUTH 168TH STREET 84 -RW08 1 ABDF 0.38 X U $25 $1,488 $1,987 $3,500 $3,500
Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park West .
New 4 -lane street including r.-o-c acquisition.and new signalat Andover.Park ___: T_:
Nest.
$1,969 $394 $1,575
_1543 . $543
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL -. $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL . $0 $0 _
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL $0 $0
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL $0 $0
$2,050 . 1410 $1,640 P.E.
•
— R/8
CONST.
1 TOTAL . .10 $0 .__
P.E.
R/W
-" COSST._ '.
1 TOTAL
$0
10
4
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA
CITY N0. 1320
COUNTY N0. 17
HEARING DATE 06/18/90
ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Page 5
P
R
0
R
T
Y
N
0
F;
U; - PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
M C N;
F A A D;
-U J0 R I;-
NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
CL R Y 6;
TA W TOTAL 0 : FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES
IS CO WORK V S;
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LN6TH E T:
N AK CODE R A;.
A S T; 1ST
L S X U; YEAR
S: 1991
2ND
YEAR
1992
3RD &
4TH
YEARS
93 -94
5TH If
6TH
YEARS
;-95-96
•
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS
LOCAL :RAP/UAB:FEDERAL::
FUNDS ; FUNDS : FUNDS : FUNDS ;;
FEDERAL
OBLIGATION PLAN
2ND
1ST YR:
THRU
ANNUAL: -
6TH
ELEMT.:
YEARS --
29 SOUTH 133RD STREET 86 -RN01 17 2 ABDF 0.13 X P $338
S. 134th Street - Interurban Ave. •• -- -- -.
Design and construct widening to 4 lanes including paving, drainage, curb and
gutter, sidewalk, channeli:ation, signal,lighting, signing.
14 8 L 0.01 X U $208
30 16TH AVE. S. BRIDGE 89 -RW08
16th Ave. S. bridge north pier
_.. - - Examine foundation soils _
31 MINKLER BLVD 84 -RWO7 1 ABDF 0.38 X U
Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park West -- ---
New 4 -lane street w /traffic signals at SC Parkway and Andover Park West.
32 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH (HNY 99) - - 14 2 ABDF 3.51 U
Boeing Access Road - South 152nd Street •
Design and construct paving, curb and gutter, drainage, sidewalks, lighting,
utility undergrounding.
33 51ST AVENUE / MACADAM ROAD / 42ND AVENUE 17 2 ABDF 1.80 U
- °- -- - Interurban Avenue - SR 518 _ - • _..T._
Design and construct paving, curb and gutter, drainage, sidewalks, lighting,
utility undergrounding
34 SOUTH 180TH STREET
Southcenter Parkway - Sperry Drive
- Reconstruct and resurface roadway
16 4 ABD 0.60 0
35 LONSACRES DRIVE (S. 158TH ST.) 84 -RW13 • 19 4 ABDF 0.10 X P $235
West Valley Highway - Nelsen Place •• -
Install curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage on existing 4 -lane street.
$338 $338
$208 $208
$2.919 $2,919 $2,919
$560 $6,440 - $7,000 $1,400 $5,600
*240 $2,760 $3,000 4600 42,400
$50 $575 $625 $125 ,.
$235 $235
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E. --
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W . -- K -
CONST.
$0 -80 -
$0 $0
t TOTAL
P.E.
R/W
5
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
•
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE 06/18/90
CITY N0. 1320 ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Page 6
F;
U; - PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FEDERAL.
P M C N; II
II
R F A A D; OBLIGATION PLAN
1 U JO R 1;
0 NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
R CL R Y 6; SOURCE OF FUNDS
I TA 8 TOTAL 0 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES ; 2ND
T IS CO WORK V S; TOTAL ; ; 151 YR;
Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LNMTH E T; ; THRU
N AK CODE R A; .. . ;.3RD & ; •5TH & _ ; ANNUAL;
N A S T; 1ST ; 2ND ; 4TH ; 6TH ; LOCAL ;RAP /UAB :FEDERAL :: ; : 6TH
0 L S X U; YEAR ; YEAR ; YEARS ; YEARS FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ; FUNDS ;; ; ELEMT.;
— - - -- — •- - - - -" -S: 1991 -: 1992 93 -94 : 95 -96 •- , „ ; YEARS
36 SOUTH 134TH STREET 84 -R827 19 2 ABDF 0.23 X U $230 $230 $230 P.E.
S. 133rd St. - 48th Ave. S. - - • - -•- -- R/W
Design and construct widening to 4 lanes including paving, drainage, curb and CONST.
gutter, sidewalks, channelization, lighting, signing.
. $ TOTAL $0 $0
37 STRANDER BOULEVARD 88 -RW03 17 2 ABDF 0.38 X U $2,500 $2,500 $500 $2,000 P.E.
Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park East R/W
Design and construct widening to 7 lanes including paving, drainage, curb and -- CONST.
gutter, sidewalks, channelization, signalization, lighting, signing.
I TOTAL $0 $0
38 TUKWILA PARKWAY @ S -LINE BRIDGE 84 -RW39 - 16 1 ADF6 0.10 X U - -.- - $231 - $231 $231 •- P.E.
Tukwila Parkway @ S -Line Bridge R/W
New access to Southcenter Mall at existing intersection. CONST.
-. _ -_ _ _._ .. - t TOTAL $0 80
39 STRANDER BOULEVARD 84 -8832 17 3 ABDF 0.38 X U $42 $493 $535 $107 $428 P.E.
Andover Park West - Lois T. Newton Bridge. 8/1
Design and construct widening to 5 lanes including paving, drainage, -curb and = -;- — '- CONST. '.
gutter, sidewalks, lighting.
40 SOUTH 178TH STREET 88 -R807 - -
Southcenter Parkway - 1 -5
Widen to 5 -lanes on new alignment with paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks,
- drainage, street lights. — - - -- - - - -- .• _ -.
--- - --16 1 ABDF 0.46 X - ».= • --
41 S. 133RD STREET BRIDGE 85 -RWO1 1 ABDF 0.40 X U
Gateway Drive - 50th Place S. • - - - -..:
New 4 -lane arterial w /bridge crossing the Duwamish River.
42 SOUTH 180TH STREET RR XIN6 87-R809 -
S. 180th (SW 43rd) @ UPRR -BNRR zing.
New separated grade crossing of existing RR tracks (joint project w /Renton).
14 1 ADF6 0.20 X U •-
$ TOTAL $0 $0
- =:-_83,248 $3,248 $649 $2,599 - -- -- P.E.
8/W
CONST.
$2,887 $2,887 $2,887
$ TOTAL $0
P.E.
R/W -
CONST.
$ TOTAL $0 $0
$0
.� $9,230 $9,230 $1,846 $7,384 - P.E. .. •... -
R/W
CONST.
$ TOTAL .1_.80
6
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA
CITY N0. 1320
COUNTY N0. 17
HEARIN6 DATE 06/18/90
ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Page 7
P
R
1
0
R
I
T
Y
N
0
F
U
NC
CL
- -.TA
IS
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS
N
A
L
M
A
JO
OF
R
W
CO
LR
AK
5
S
F;
U;
C N;
A D;
PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
R I;
R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
Y 6;
TOTAL 0 : FOR ALL FUNDIN6 TYPES
WORK V 5;
LN6TH E T;
CODE R A;
T; 1ST
X U; YEAR
5; 1991
2ND
YEAR
1992
3RD &
4TH
YEARS
93 -94
5TH &
6TH
YEARS
95 -96
SOURCE OF FUNDS
TOTAL
LOCAL
FUNDS ; FUNDS
FEDERAL
OBLIGATION PLAN
;RAP /UAB;FEDERAL;;
FUNDS : FUNDS ;;
2ND
1ST YR;
THRU
ANNUAL; _. _
6TH
ELEMT.;
.. ; YEARS
43 MINKLER BLVD 84 -RW15
- Andover Park W. - Andover Park E.
Widen from 4 to 5 lanes.
44 TRECK DRIVE EXTENSION 87 -RWO6 • - --
Andover Park West - exist. Treck Drive
Design and construct new 3 -lane street on new alignment including paving,
drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, lighting.- -.
19 3 ABDF 0.17 X U
19 1 ABDF 0.11 X U
45 SOUTH 151ST STREET 87 -RWO8 19 3 ABDF 0.10 X U
51st Ave. S. - 52nd Ave. S.
Design and construct street widening including paving, drainage, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, lighting.
46 NELSEN PLACE 88-RW05 19 3 ABDF 0.11 X U
S. 156th St. - S. 158th St.
- Design and construct widening including paving, drainage, curb and gutter, .
sidewalks, lighting.
_ 47 SOUTH 168TH STREET 84 -RN35 1 ABDF 0.17 X U
Andover Park West - Andover Park East
Design and construct new 4 -lane street including right -of- way acquisition,
-.. paving, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk,lighting. . -
48 SOUTH 144TH STREET 84 -RW29
Interurban Ave. - Duwamish
River _
Design and construct widening including
sidewalks, lighting
49 SOUTH 143RD STREET 84 -RW25
Interurban Avenue - Duwamish River
. Design and construct widening including
sidewalks, lighting
19 2 ABDF 0.11 X U
paving, curb and gutter, drainage,
19 2 ABDF 0.20 X U
paving, curb and gutter, drainage.
1778 $778 1778
$429 $429 1429
$158 1158 1158
1310 1310 $310
1373 $373 $373
$182 1182 1182
$418 $418 4418
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL 10 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL f0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 : -. $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL
7
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1991 TO 1996
CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE 06/18/90
CITY N0. 1320 ADOPTION DATE 06/25/90
COUNTY N0. 17 RESOLUTION N0. 1147
July 3, 1990
Page 8
F; II
U; PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FEDERAL
P M C N:
R F A A D: OBLIGATION PLAN
I - .0 JO R I;
0 NC OF R N; EXPENDITURE PLAN
R CL R Y G: SOURCE OF FUNDS ,
I TA W TOTAL 0 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES ; 2ND
T I5 CO WORK V S; TOTAL ; 1ST YR:
Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LN6TH E T; ; THRU
AK CODE .R. A; - ;.3RD & ; 5TH & ; ANNUAL; .
N A 5 T; 1ST ; 2ND : 4TH ; 6TH LOCAL :RAP/UAB:FEDERAL:: : 6TH
0 L S X U; YEAR : YEAR ; YEARS : YEARS FUNDS FUNDS ; FUNDS : FUNDS :: ELEMT.;
_v -._ S: 1991 : 1992 ; 93 -94 ; 95 -96 „ ; YEARS
50 SOUTH 140TH STREET 84-RW26 19 2 ABDF 0.11 X U
Interurban Avenue - Duwamish River .....
Design and construct widening including paving, curb and gutter, drainage,
sidewalks, lighting
51 SOUTH 143RD PLACE 84 -RW28 19 2 ABDF 0.19 X U
Interurban Avenue - Duwamish River
Design and construct widening including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks,
lighting.
52 MINKLER BLVD - - -- .1 ABDF 0.50 0 U -•
West Valley Highway - Oakesdale
Design and construct new 5 -lane arterial with bridge cross- ing UPRR & BNRR
tracks.
53 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH AND SOUTH 130TH INTERSECTION 14 6 ABDH 0.28 U
500 feet north, south, and east of intersection
Design and construct traffic signal, channelization, lighting, and approach
improvements.
54 SOUTH 152ND STREET 19 2 ABDF 0.25 U
42nd Avenue South - Pacific Highway South
Design and construct paving, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, - .lighting,
utility undergrounding.
55 NORFOLK STREET - 1 ABDF 0.61 .0 __ ..
East Marginal - West Marginal
Design and construct paving, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalks, lighting,
bridge crossing Green River.
56 SOUTH 144TH STREET 17 2 ABDF 0.30 U
Pacific Highway - Military Road -
Design and construct widening, drainage, curb and gutter, sidewalk, lighting,
utility undergounding.
$182 $182 $182
$253 $253 $253
$7,000 $7,000 $7,000
$200 $200 1200
$40 $460 $500 $500
_1100 $1,150 $1,250 $1,250 -.
$500 $500 $500
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
i TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST. -.
t TOTAL 10 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST. _
1 TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
8
t TOTAL $0 - $0 _
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
t TOTAL $0 $0
P.E.
R/W
CONST.
1 TOTAL .$0 . $0
So il.
rt
"
Elt 111
NM Al EC MN' tali
MIL reviton \
d t s 4 11.
lit Ile '1%00
Dore
•
•
•
110EING
IELD -
ow am
kING
1-\
I [
e"
CITY OF TUKWLA
TIP 1991 -1996
%NO. c
Molar
J
ot
a
h.,,il r 4o !“
Crf y
Rainier Beach
COUNTY
NATION
AIAPORI
-1
,,ett4)
BRYN
MAWR
3:
71; IC7raIrl •
1 1 S
Hit•er
g 54
6,07.4 •
MeV CO,•
II s
ti le Lake
EXIT
152
5 VL I Ett,:m.
1215
Angle Like