Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-16-88 - GAELIC MANAGEMENT - EMBASSY SUITESEMBASSY SUITES CONSTRUCTION OF EIGHT- STORY HOTEL WITH PARKING WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY & SOUTH 158T" STREET EPIC 16 -88 AFF•DAVIT OF OISTROUTION JOANNE JOHNSON . hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice (] Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit Q Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1990 (SEE ATTACHED) Name of Project EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL File Number EPIC -16 -88 , 19 . WAC 197 -11 -970 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal AMEND SITE PLAN TO ELIMINATE 2.5 -STORY GARAGE AND REPLACE WITH EXPANDED SURFACE PARKING ON 1.9 ACRES TO EAST Proponent JOHN SLOAN Location of Proposal, including street address, if any SE * OF S. 158TH STREET/ WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY INTERSECTION IN SEC. 24, TWN. 23 N, RGE. 4E, TUKWILA, WA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -16 -88 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS El This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by FEBRUARY 22. 1990 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Address Date Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tuk"l. -, WA 98188 Signature You may appeal t is determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS Mitigating Conditions Modifying EPIC- 16 -88: Embassy Suites Hotel The previous determination of non - significance is hereby modified with the following condition: 1. All provisions for surface water drainage shall conform with the Nelson Place Drainage Study or equivalent as determined by the Public Works Director prior to the issuance of a building permit. This shall include, but not be limited to bio- filtration swales to provide for removing 95 percent of all contaminants in order to satisfy Federal Clean Water and State Dept. of Fisheries requirements. 2. The applicant shall replace any landscaping lost as a result of biofiltration with materials of a size which are equivalent to the surrounding plants as determined by the Dept. of Community Development Director. This shall include, but not limited to, plantings on the northern perimeter through which oily parking lot runoff will sheet flow. file: Embassy.mit ' TAX ASSESSMENT PAkCEL NO. PROPERTY OWNERS i 0005800026 COMMERCE MTG. CO. P.O. BOX 4113 PORTLAND, OR 98349 0005800029 WHITNEY BROS P.O. BOX 459 LAKE BAY, WA • 0005800009 OWRR & NAV CO. c/o UNION PACIFIC RR CORP P.O. BOX 2500 BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 0005800030 NENDELS TUKWILA ASSOC. 2230 RUCKER AVE. 98349 EVERETT, WA 98201 0005800033 NELSEN, HELEN B. 15643 W. VALLEY HWY. TUKWILA, WA 98188 0005800028 TAYLOR MELVIN R & TOUMA, MOUNI .15668 W. VALLEY HWY. TUKWILA, WA 98188 '', 0005800025 KAUPAT, PETER H. P.O. BOX 88108 SEATTLE, WA 98138 ;1 .1 0005800031 LOSEY SR, ROBERT F & WINONA M 808 SW 4TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 0095800024 NELSEN ,, HELEN ,,B. ;1569 WI.,VAL,EXH WUI�[WflAL, "WA 00058p0004 N LtE: !,, HEL 1;643 I1.1 TUKW� 98188 0005800008 PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT 7400 S. 158TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98188 TAX ASSESSMENT PARCEL NO. -RESIDENT LABELS 9 TENANT 15802 stVa1.; 1 :, A, '8 Hwy 188 NENDELS INN . 15801 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 • UNION PA 7301 ORP Street 98188 EASY RIDER BOAT CO. 15666 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98188 CASCADE PACIFIC MORTGAGE CITY OF TUKWILA r' 15668, West Valley Hwy. �6gQOr Spu,thcentr Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Ty'kwil'a,. W�1 98188 / , J J J 1� MUELLER BRASS CO. 15470 Nelson Place S. Tukwila, WA 98188 HENRY LIEBMAN, ATTY. 1500 Tower Bldg. 7th & Olive Seattle, WA 98101 TENANT 7351 S Tu NE SN t 9818$ TENANT 15813 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98055 DANIEL BOONE PAINT 15701 Nelson Place So. Tukwila, WA 98188 INDUSTRIAL CRATING & PACKING UGE P.O. Box 88299 4 0 Seattle, WA 98138 ATTN: PALMER ARZO TENANT 15700 Nelson Road So. Tukwila, WA 98188 fi X41' 1 R \& `LI'HT --• 1 +S . ENVIRONMI:TAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CITY OF TUKWILA 1 _ q0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: E Building Planning ~ Pub Wks PIC: Fire fl Police fl ParksiRec PROJECT -/V/ (?la s S y S u t TC3 S( TC P N g6 V (S ADDRESS 56- p P (J. VA LL EY K 7,s8ri „ S T IN roes rG i t o^ DATE TRANSMITTED 1. /1 / / ?o RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1 /z4 7F0 STAFF COORDINATOR UMenv k_fes4pATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT vim. 44 teazAixz- wit l A ,;a z),/-/ Date: Comments prepared by: , ck,43 ENVIRONMEIPTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 7"/14 • /4 S S y EPIC: 1 - 90 SUIT-C-5 S(iC P(J►N ?6V(Sivt.(' ADDRESS 5C o p ( , J , VA G(. EY K w y 7 t 5 S 7—f- ST": IN TE' esc-G i i o f.) DATE TRANSMITTED 1 /i C� / ?o RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1 /26 7?o STAFF COORDINATOR Vozivo 0Me7 o k_ /g5DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED The attached environmental checklist was received regarding this project. Please review and comment below to advise the responsible official regarding the threshold determination. The environmental review file is available in the Planning Department through the above staff coordinator. Comments regarding the project you wish carried to the Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment and City Council should be submitted in the comment section below. ITEM COMMENT i - - i f dOr d J L L /- /40&. -er". 3` , -' T , ^ ems- , Date: ! ommen s prepa d by: ,� „_ /mss C 09/14/89 CITY OF TAKWILA RE- APPLICATI N CHECKLIST coMMencrs PRE = APPLICATION'. FILE NO PROJECT` -- 1`AP<AS`( La tr n ANSIoN (ALT To ST[ZUCTUW' SITE ADDRESS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals Center: Ao0tf'1cmion. oISTr [_ Channelization /Striping /Signing Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk 1'E1\.wtcrS Excavation (public) Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) L [= Flood Zone Control _ Hauling (2,000 Bond, Cert. Ins.) _ Landscape Irrigation — Moving an Oversized Load Sanitary Side Sewer th Sewer - Sewer Storm - Water - Water - Water - Water - Water - Other rough the City's Permit Center: Main Extension (private) Main Extension (public) Drainage Main Extension (private) Main Extension (public) Meter (exempt) Meter (permanent) Meter (temporary) 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). 3. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. I] 4. Water and sewer assements may apply and will be determined during the utility plan review process. , �t Rovj oe (0 5i olatu Ru i_ t.,( STANo MU) cc� ft / 6 U'rren. Al -* S c 3rrH Sc.( 1 or 5 . � S 5-�=^ s7 C Qtr tu►4'tE. jzuc�n� 'PAZ (1,10 sirl Mfl � 5 . Provide sidewalks per Ordinance #1158, #1217 and #1233, or obtain waiver. l lyonn� �i A1110 sis / c 1 V - ms s I S mRAE A ci-u1N ice, IM? Maus s L/AFA 6. Provide a- 6eetechnical analysis. iru wll L. I� i3 /1L�-0 �5. 11 11 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of grading /fill permit application._ 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVD datum and recognized bench marks). 9. Provide traffic analysis /trip generation study for 10. Provide developers agreement for 11. Provide the following easements and maintenance agreements 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your deve- lopment. 13. Obtain Metro Waste Discharge permit or approval (684 - 2300). 14. Complete Industrial Waste Survey and return to Metro (self addressed and stamp provided). 15. Review the following City Studies when designing your project and preparing your plan submittal: -144LLSEN, PL.JLoir A -(IBS l�2alNf�t�L- T2F1 ())(1 /KAN`1 Dim <. ( ccLT 16. -1) R9 \) t ify. n-iv) ci),-)IA A? `p Kam. (11M/ si 11- RAN AN LTo s- (-4; ) 17. TA N 1 s Pl-- / 1_u K,L; ACI\�rS J)1 - _ ?ice Ll rIrN 7-)t Sl (Av (-P-Rbii \'D1NTI F 18 . Sc,.,AL E tJ / _ A t _ -47 17 Gl-ci- e7 ( Dl? OF 'Dl' \I- LONTA \ ( ) ] 19. iMCL.UO(N4 CM LU I:KT C.t»NI C: ili mo Ifs(► C:k�TcJL 61 cl.,3 L /N3 MA, ] 20. 17 tAv i-Zy A-73 KJ. • I tA S • 15.8 . I k-I Is vE s! e-N, -1-b colvfkA vN TC �3n.S(ti .STUoY . 2RP ,A5---, +-Iipalitl't( C, c' ilkA s ru, sr iN(r - (kt_t_ cPby (staff): (Ya.,S Date ( 6'v hecklist prepared y (staff): Aft k f you should have any questions regarding the permit process or would like to obtain additional orms and handouts, contact the Permit Center at 433 -1851. PREAPP5, 1/90) • • (N CLLUX t\■y . EML- -m fJ A cE T 1 vtxpP ►I pw b.� to S 11 c 1 1 rV1D /1 S "RAT y r o' 1 2 ) Su-- i\\ . Nov ( cx. 7465\. ��( Ln 1ti cy .Su--) Pc L Ft-t71( fM -2\) ( L (Tt (� F — ALL 731.IRtw , S t A L (rt.) Su.)A L(= Ste / S�7Z tALT t()C 6F DOI Lt_ rnLwT Controlipo. Epic File No. 6--Re Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Embassy Suites Hotel, Tukwila, WA 2. Name of applicant: John Currie Sloan 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 840 Savers Federal Building, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 4. Date checklist prepared: 4 January 1990 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is underway on the H. NELSEN TRACT. Additional land, PARCEL A and PARCEL B could begin site utilities and grading within 30 days of BAR approval and issue ot amended building permit. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. Does not apply. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A previous Environmental Checklist was completed upon the first BAR submittal for this project. I know ot no other information related to this project. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. Does not apply. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. No. Does not apply. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Construction of an eight story atrium, all suites, full service hotel with surface parking for a minimum of 266 spaces. Additional road work will be done on West Valley Highway and Longacres Way to improve the channellization and signalizaton of vehicular traffic. The site contains approximately five acres of land. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide.the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. See attached documents Exhibit A and Exhibt B for further description. The property consists of three parcels of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of S.R. 181 (West Valley Highway) and Longacres Way (South 158th Street). 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. Does not apply. -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA.• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, of er Flat to gently slopes. IIIEvaluation for b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A sod mat which ranges up to 6" thick underlain by a unit of very loose to medium dense silty sand and soft to stiff silt and sandy silt, 5 -12 feet thick. This unit under- lain by very soft to medium stiff silt and sandy silt, 12 -20 feet thick. Dense sand below. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Does not apply. e. Describe the purpos'e',' type, and approximate quanti ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Five to seven feet of fill will be placed under the building to raise the buildings first floor elevation to be more in line with West Valley Highway for ease of vehicular access. The remainder of the site will be graded and filled only to allow proper drainage on the site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. A limited possibility of erosion could exist during construction and erosion control methods will be implimented to prevent this possibility. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 80%. �•- Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:. The owner will follow the recommendation of their civil engineer for specific methods of erosion control. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Limited automobile odors (trucks). Heavier use during site work, foundations and superstructure, then less intense use of trucks during the remainder of the project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Do not know. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None • ••._ 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River is 170' away from the Southwest corner of the site measured from the top of the bank to the corner 410 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Some site work and landscaping will occur in this area. No building construction or paving will occur within this area. The area represents approximately 800 square feet of land at the southwest corner of the property. Exhibit C 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply.. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Does not apply. 5 ) Does the • .proposal -lie•. -within a' 100 - year;' floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Does not apply. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Does not apply. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Does not apply. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water from roof drains and surface water from parking lost will flow into catch basins and into either a water detention /retention tank designed from the King County, WA Standards or the water will flow into a part of the proposed LID system. • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The avoid- ance of excess slopes on grade and the use of land- scaping to reduce runoff from planting areas. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ,evergreen-tree:- fir; - --cedar; pine;-other . - _ shrubs x grass X pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All of the existing grass will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Does not apply. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Does not apply. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Does not apply. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Does not apply. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Do not know. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Does not apply. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Does not apply. 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy will be the primary source of power for tools, conveyor systems and lighting during. construction. Electric energy will be used for HVAC, power and lighting and gas will be used for hot water production in the hotel. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Do not know. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The hotel meets or exceeds all conservation requirements established by the State of Washington. 7., Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Does not apply. 1) Describe special emergency services that might . be required. Does not apply. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Does not apply. .Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The traffic on West. Valley Highway and the trains on the east side of our property are the largest noise generators in the area. No major problem is anticipated. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. General Construction related noise will be produced. No unusual operation is anticipated that would create a problem. Normal construction hours would be between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday thru Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Limiting working hours to times that conform with the City's noise ordinance will be complied with. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Light commercial and pasture land. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Used as pasture land prior to this development. c. Describe any structures on the site. An auction barn exists on the northeast corner of the site which is scheduled for demolition. Existing transmission lines and pole exist in the Puget Power easement which will remain. 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? An auction barn on the northeast corner of the property will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Do not know. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Does not apply. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Thirty j. Approximately how many people would the completed project-displace?- Three k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project type and design will be of a commercial nature for the hospitality industry which dictates good landscape design and an inviting structure. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed s.tr.ucture(s.).r not -Including antennas; what -is- - --the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The building height is 95 feet. The exterior skin of the building consists of a combination of three colors of synthetic stucco and tented glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. The building is sited in a valley on a flat plain :obstructing no prominent views. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The location of the building on the site, the deletion of the parking deck as origin�ly proposed and a revised lancape plan using denser and larger plant materials in order to "soften" the edge of the building as sited. IIIEvaluation for ' Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Does not apply. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Do not know. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Does not apply. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? A trail along a portion of the Green River is west of the property across West Valley Highway. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. A proposed inter- urban trail study is being presented with this submittal for consideration. This study was done by Beck and Baird in conjunction with the City's Parks and Recreation Department. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The owner will follow and impliment the interurban trail agreed upon by the City. S Gr E 7ZA ( G S-7v' jorP Pew Di > 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Do not know. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply. 14. Transportation a.... Identify-public—streets-and- highways serving- the-- -- -• --• site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The .site is bordered on the west side by West Valley.Highway (S.R. 181) with two site access points and on the north border is Longacres Way with one access directly across from the street, Nelsen Place. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approximately 266 spaces will be provided. Since the parking spaces for the auction house are unstriped and on gravel, it is impossible to count the spaces (estimated 50 spaces) to determine the number to -be eliminated. iEvaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Improvements to West Valley Highway (S.R. 181) with new chann liza- tion and signalization is being constructed and new curbs will be provided along the site at Longacres Way. Both streets are public roads. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Do not know. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Street and signal improvements as described in 14a and 14d should reduce the trans- __ p_ortation_ impact; on,:.this„area.... 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Improved street, signal and site access by compliance with codes,variances, etc. will upgrade this intersection to improve public service to this area. 16. Utilities a. Circ - 'liti- rentl available at the site icit ; n. •. ,T water, Cefuse service) telephone,' sanitary sewer ' septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A new water main will be continued from the west side of West Valley Highway (S.R. 181) due east to the hotel site. This is a City utility. Also a section of the proposed LID may be constructed during • the building construction work. This is a City utility. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency relying on them to mak 'ts decision. Signature: Date Submitted: pA/ 5 January 1990 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. is Evaluation for Agency Use Only `TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAO Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? By increasing hard surface parking an increase discharge of storm water is anticipated. A small increase in emission from automobiles could be anticipated due to more employees working at this site. No hazardous or toxic substances will be discharged. No noise producing work will be done at this site. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: The increased discharge of storm water will be controlled by detention /retention tanks with controlled discharge valves. or•.by.-the Owner• participation -in a •portion of: the LID with the storm sewer feeding into the LID system. No other measures are under consideration at this time. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Although some asture land (grass) will be removed, our approved landscape plan introducing trees, shrubs, and groundcovers will be implemented to affect a new look for this area. The trees will provide a long lasting improvement for the property and the City. No animals, fish or marine life are affected. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Does not apply. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Conservation of energy is addressed by the use of insulation and construction that is equal to or exceed the Energy Standards adopted by the State of Washington. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Does not apply. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Does not apply. • IIIEvaluation for Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Does not apply. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Does not apply. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Since the present site is served by a major highway little increase in demand is expected. Public services also serve this area and little demand is expected. Some utilities will be inadequate in size to handle the new demand and will need to be improved. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are - : -- Transportat on•should-be assisted'ty lanes and signals, plus new curbs and gutters with limited acces's to the site. This occurs along West Valley Highway and Longacres Way. Better access for traffic pattern will only enhance the public services in this area. The owner is participating with the City on increasing service capacity for water.and storm sewer which will reduce the impact of these services in the future. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply. Agency Use Only • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? The proposal is in compliance with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Does not apply. 'TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAII E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS Evaluation for Agency Use Only The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objective of this proposal is to provide a new all suites hotel to accommodate the traveling public in the City of Tukwila with the use of surface parking in lieu of structured parking (parking deck) on previously approved plans. By providing surface parking and the appropriate landscaping it will eliminate one of the two structures on the site. It will also eliminate the structure which was crowding the north side of the property. The impact of the original scheme pertaining to the Environmental Checklist appeared to be minimal, however, the elimination of the deck should greatly improve the aesthetic impact of the entire project. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? No other alternate means existed at the original time of submittal other than a parking deck. This is still the only option if the proposed change to the BAR is unsuccessful._ .__._ . ._ , ..._ _ ___ 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: The alternative of keeping the parking garage versus its removal and additional surface parking with landscaping are the issues. It is my opinion that surface parking is desired in order to lessen the building's impact on one of the site's visual focal points (the northwest corner) thus negating the designer conflicts caused by intergrating the design of a parking deck and a hotel. Again, I will say the aesthetics as they affect the environment will be greatly enhanced by the elimination of the parking deck. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? ' If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Does not apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Does not apply. -23- EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B , - _ l.) - ..... 1 c Zr ' V),,,. i-1 ...-5. -......_ u , 0019 : >• . . - III 'MI OISCRIPI.I. Km, . . 'MI' IX,CalINOIV ...■. • F•7.r...y..€7,7.........r.: 'TM.= n.7:1" ..* "t4-711;.SI . . ra.71:::...-:‘14.27:Fr..Z.7::::::::::71".7. • ...................-.. ............... .... ........ .4.",!..7774......r.ier:77,1"Zi7r1F-4.. Ft:ea :I-Z. ..,•.:4.4"::::::^:7-2:17...ria — • .. F::::.:._...,:.-• TI.V:=4:1•.=.r...,r- :::::.T............7''''' ''' 17.-..7.-r.......r.1:14...........r.W.- a zzur....... ..—.. —.... --. -.... - ........... ::-.:-.. . 4; . . . . - larl.........-r..::.=.- z-e.:::-..--.1.- • .......... 1 Ulf ".. ‘ .• ‘-‘," II . ) ..,- , : i I 7 t • ? - 0 SZL:Cir.171 . • ''' '` ."`;:s7- :rflil.AY Y........75U..riiit.: Green River Int:. 1 Site 1 i ( N'st " V ' --x TITLE /PROPERTY /VICINITY MAP Hot • ...N --- - -- West alley Hignwcry (6'• . 71• - , :.., c /...e..n ac R„az. .cip. I .V . ... :. :.., . . - :. i .. . L., .- -•-, ■. - •, • 1 =wa,r -. ..■ .-, --- -, --- --*!-=- r,' - Green River r *• , - III - -- i'--z — • ..11, , 1 ''' 1 11 ' r. ■ I. . ..„i .4 . • '. ) . 7— . , i --' 1 ' e e: ; t • I i --- ,- - . 1 1 I I f ' r ! ■,,,' •,...'...,.,:::,..•,../".) ,, ..:.. - ..: ',7--'!1'., .,..,■:.:" 4 "'") , • ' ./,‘ A.:•' ' • • ' ' 1. ` • ' • • '''..- — '' i •11•'; • . ., , . 1. , ./ ... , 3 '' • 1 e i t - -""' i: .• • ro , tA ';-."vsT." •'.'- , • - , : ../. . • r:, . told.... 1 - !'f: ' - •‘•••••••'•;••"' " I , I e ' e ' •••• ''• . ". t2+ • ''... i• ' ' ' . • ', t '. ' •,' • I 4'.4 • 1 • , ',. ,.' , :. , ' ', i -,,F,. 1, .. • • . ....,.. _ %, . „ ,,. • • " 111 I " ' :... J 117ii- ii I 1 _ , I k • : ? 1 :._ ....:— I's" -s. t .. ...i..- . ' I 1" 1 I . . : Longacres Race . , - Ij.1 , CITY OF TUKWILA r VICINITY MAP ... .. I • — f. _ ., : I 1 . k:F4i;T:g.;*74:41.2,2._W3., 7- __.. ., / 47, • - ..< ... 4. •:. :•1-' ...,', ■ - --`7 /gib lir f Toi i i S ..1 i...1 w.-- '- LW ^ • Z :. EXHIBIT C 1 .u. arrwfr(a I I (r(rt I ...r- ..r•.,•. «.».�� /.. i.�,'- ....,. �- r1,.f.....•✓ ti I —J ` �....j__.., a e•, P•P I— _= LdIVGAG`f?ES is. isam L ! gig +,• r.l[.o(o _ Is.Prl9'l' .`P --sue + 's. k:•s ";:see..‘ rufl ✓' ` •I I 1 ; ar_ �fsd lea e_ r' u v£.> .. _ -1 ! t`. +AJe r• °8 J: — 1���� ( �... o•M,...« • II rofµ aoo .I ' f .. Pr�'�_7O^ _ •r,r"-O otu ro w e 'i l' rf v it ie ,00um - 1 rtaS IV f[� !r r w,i �C •,. ��� r �:1 r(•es10.[ ,• •;' ,•` .� I ��cw �,. Q� r�+ rdr r■ r PrvN r ` ' °, °�— r•�— � 'j .. �'. I ro. .� /. - i '•.if . �• HOS Siri�0, f0— ,P,: , I co..r •oleo �� .v «� r~ � . fs. .•a:.: W • G I 1 rs. r ----- n� ' ( alJ \ ; /. ^{ 5!.J, a s• r v ° I I��s . I . r I�•. ' 7721 1 1 fo 1 , �\ i� a 1 I AUCTION BARN \ / • CINIS. .,0 M r• P' I•IJ 3 I •1I r(...( SLOW 1 •:I • • ro. ( /�� r4• r'' 7• 111i. `s' � RCEL/moBn P. I• i ":CASs SCALE• ,J ' r i I�1, i ^ .. ' I. y r /1 e In il 1 I. .,,.......%'- ` / 1�� ror ..' dl l .� I U�3 I �y e$ 11/ N.NELSEN Ii ..� mKto—L._j I tS AREA r 142, 551.45 SO FT . r' tlII I { 4 - I •d 1 d 1 3273 ACRES A��, %'`• ••• 2 • P 1 e ,. •' I r: wr ' I 1 l ,y ,. ,s r•' ,e',,. 0I i 1 ,� I. II WI I� P' •' •i e a I ar 1. • , f2,�i ,•_I.. .. ■ 11 �1 s r` Lx r'. e' •' `I r ` I e n' 1 ' , F r, IV 1' I f '' ' �Iri r � ,1. r' r' ,,, •,• ,.• J ill I : I ,. 11 . P` ,, ' �.? Mr(s MS 4C. s.r er.K•✓ MS 1."1`.. s I _ b w: �,,0_ rs _ S.,d: ____-,0 �- JC `II• -_,''. te' ,J:. =-i+• a uroilor a • ,w1 1 rs..aa' I 4 Lrr�pI�i_ P'1j1, y� �• -,� , !1!•ef'IO r (. 0.,la a el O rum 41aq ES JP., San ARC SURVEYOR'S CERTIF /CAT£ SAWS. IC 00.scr UC 1.1117 .a LA' • rK� araw WIT, f w.m VO. Oecree not orator,. re. Ake re mmraa Mel NSW awls &mutt nw ien ire." ample= MM.( MI MS ALIT Of/MVO. Mt MO C CIrtIXWIfI,w ,CCWIC w n�I Of WM, IS r r C c 4.0 1.01.1•00S 0.0 VK�rt M['O C.M VISORS 01011 1 S.r0011 i° I,Yf la MO e0 W.3 Of RKI S;0.4,1•ef -• e.. WAIT• 1.3 YO CbrrCnpO, p (MwMM O w r MRS M( +O w0VN✓ ▪ • r 01011. !MS 011•0; I0MS.a.r.r, SC S.e. 1.11. p O O SAWS ▪ AIM/ r• rssprf OW. AIM .01 RNrr rrrp• COI Of sr, W.I(em SOUL •T,..4 If' •fe•OIe•S WM. ee roer •1• WS, teIM Cr ----- . C0 Rr 1PSr Rr/ ES fYIrA(O /W •(S/ O/ C Or µVON NACIM /RAOIS r(mrACC 0f C000 Rmw.r..earYO• Mete IS. CI ., eenv • I MM.., arO.eull0ty rer •rrr 00RrION W N(AAY READER 0.G Mr. 40 SEE 24, 7.050& R. 01-.. 0..M 00NN(IPJ Ortf8, 06.0 L.S. 051 -5000 PO 802 We Re-WOW w4SNINOION f 0050 ALTA BOUNDARY d TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY KOAR - SEATAC PARTNERS, L.P. EMBASSY SUITES TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1,00 I 1909 O •ICI NfMAR OR AS Sierprhl JOe N• 56a6• / .J0 I 89029 s, b COterivel Or . LONGACRES WAY - ■ ■ V Z 2. 0 L-1 c.es >- Z 0 L.,-.1 0 CZ Z )— H. Dec evrb---a-perwtoe h.T....„.i. , ,----, !. \ ... \ i 1 i t 1 1 , ■ A , I i „, 1 . .... _..... ./._"..._._. Q , os , • ____ • ..., an _ .- - - - -- __ _ ,,,, - a ,.....___ __ -.919 _ - .99-91.9 -.9 (---= ._. II 1 L v L ti 1 ( - - .., r V C/2 — - \\ \ \ ' g”) EMBASSY SUIS HOTEL tII I I 1 _ ( m • ■ 1 / PROJECT SUMMARY • , 1 1 42 Ilt• II OEM. SY. aoss az AKA 2213P.341 • 1 1001 47 LOCUM 1474 4.30 11 NI 04411. MD • IOW $75,118. II MI IMCNOAC.4 021/1 • DOCK 10304 .1. n 104.4 16.3” 0. •■ 24%. MU SUNUP/ iriCae LAO 3.3434 •I . - 1 I 1. • • 7 1 I - . I..., II • • - o • , 1 • I • I • I 1 ''....--- -Ni . i 1 \ ■ 1 . I I . \\ / I • - . ! 6. • ,.. ... --L r-711-:---- ..,7:0,..., 17•Nr3::; • I 1 Will I4,.4,241, =Oman mat am BM El *I NI1A PAR= CALCULAIKK/ 42. •••••4 IMMO CODE MO CCOI 401410 Ill 14/1444 ft Mt 4011.134 =MCI UR POMO ROE P/030/0014 411•RET . a PM CIIMID FILM Intmiluen Vo.: r poo pots • . 7. - _ . I . 1 i i I PERSONA3 •,/ KUM MOM MOM MOM 1 PERSONAS • I t PERSONA> • I 04,7011Z 406 1 rtosavis .■ gross IMAM. Ca. DS OLLORD WORN SWAP PERSPS 14 SPACE/. Tn. a SP. /4 KM. 9444 PERSCR. n SPACE/4OP 234 -..— 4. Id I .5 ...P S ROM ALM MOD 14•740 24 1441.1J• 70021, 1 To .24; . MPACT !WE • ' \ ! LONGAINSS WAY I MO ME no ��II Z Z CD 0 Q /` ICJ O J w Z w F.- ! a. j) 1. .111111111b. A. Imo. � .a . wowre. 0r► v� .no•r.r..rrrrrr.aa.aM�Wa.rrr.9. wwnwl •nw• •••��w' o• ��..• ��. a:::.❖ t:•:::: wrrtern .or..�:::':::v: :,rlwrrr�.r'. • e3e •u ,r.::•tsrr.we., :,, ir.•::::::•mil r1. Ail. ti r� ..a % aaw� 1,_ _'_ • n _ .... .� �� _ _ aaaml _ _ 1 Goa. a fil • t. • • • •fE' CO � `.� !!1 ;1 �' . El Cal IS l� f �:..:., aaai In _ © A o i ®°° /l I,. . .,0 ,...., 0 ma 114 411, Ell �1 12 4.: al 0•15 <: w) r `fir �M, vra �{ •���r, ya ..': M1, © .... 41,4 (iii: /1114 "or ..-.:/�1 4. • 134' 409 r—, ® f111: : Dnr N VI _.., .1. ss ''j, \ Vu ANT LIST ' • • SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN ♦• 1. rn 1....r w ur . © yr �' Ir.. r,---- Iv } _. ? m , +�•• _ ,— - �I f -: i. .i�► As* 11' ` r.N xw,xx . ... w .,.._ N .-:: ,. li 0 f. (1\ C� 4 41 1 • � WI, MOO—. ' r r.._ • ,„ .,r w ..rr r,.... ... .... .. .... ,....,. / r.r w ..rr r..... . .. n ^' ...... . 1 m w err ....,.. •, ., , .x,.. r... ,,.W .� .r a rf r. . r... ,,.W », wrr , .W x i 4.11 , W: :/.. •j, /��a; a f , Via' 1 1 11, I •.. 11 1� --r l •'1 r�. ;; ::: ® i n /1 A :1 'i) �� 4 __a, ._ �__�.»...__" PLANT UST (TOOL) a r..r M ^ ..1. M1 .r tl 1 .., my g 44 ��11� ._.' : N mtg.. w 1 r.. .=1... 11 ..N A •rrtl" b1y1MV NI. ■ vl..r MI .... . M {..., 10 (( u I� (`•I =,:-.r.41• Ir N a...r wll r R Man ql Imam. • / .1. .r.rr MI n... 0 nr „, rEI•MRh 'U�Cw1� �) - liti soD Irmo —± ,:r+ .. - . -.. r_ .• 1 L _ ���. -�\ — s.D .n.l. I' ..1... i w,: �I CO n N amen. M1 ..r n r tl.1.V ..t. mu. M..... ...rte ......fir..... In, -i+ C - I ft• Ae.aoisasas fi isee. - arr er r. • N M. r. V 1 .1. rY.r ...... SITE PLAN • I I r . ■ n �o - • o o o . • 7 - 0 z n .6 7 0 0 r, Ategt:.4 j 1g 1 O. ii IIIII■wlill�l 2 k • �' + + _ + --o , I �■l1 IlilIlliiii � ,"„-r■© � ■E ■r ■E ■E11E ■i- e!Eta.�sE2 ,:2.52 -.�i EZ ■C■3 ■fw1 ■r ■1,,," s 1�" ` # ,. ,i ��� 11111 ■■■■■= E ■1� �■ ■E ■3 r�rr�.���— C 3 111■1ME ■E ■E ■3 i ■M ■ElIE .i�c� ■E11Y ■E — ■C ■2 —& ■11.1111 ■.._.■■l0 ■�11 EM■I�o�11�or::.:. a1 11111 ■■■■■�_■_■_IIr� E ■E ■E ■E ■E ■EI1E ■ME ■: ■E ■E ■E ■31IE ■2!71 ■E■E ■E ■111111 ..■■■■� � * ■� ■o1I�11 um •Em11rm ■mil ■E ■E ■01i : ■, E■II■! o !2iu : ■0 ■C ■E■CIE: !TM' i �y ■IUUI iiiNANIMM li�l ■mt1E -1'. - - -- IMMO 11.111 A ti kill" i0 :.311E ■E E■2 E ■E 2 ■E. 11!■I E ■E �: ■E -� - rn-.:,v..- g.�., ��0.- •�sAGu� u.+::•,. A..c,vct•. e err. xi.ce Wi n.u. m. - 1 '-. 1-IwJ I�-l�l a �,. M w �w� _ .rn.. . 4 A__I_ ■ ■■ ■■ ■ ■l!!\\ ■ UM \■ UM ■ ■!■ ■ I� -.. b_ r,p..„* i N d __ �■ ■ 1�■ „r ■■ ■ rrr''' r ■,piIt,IIi■MIU■ °■ MS ifi■ win, ego ■■ ■ /, ■■ ■ ■I If .. ■ ■s ■ MM 1 ■ ■■r ■■1 ii ■ ■ ■��M�' - I C.0.17. -o �: EMBASSY West Elevation , .W.tWA-4 ihF+11Y6r wows - wr..a 10 .,d-N I! RU .4D SUITES HOTEL Exterior Materials • .am rw..sl�eelk0 aNfA• .n�, ai... , - ALL Mme. 1!D OIM" 1 y�, a,. - t ,..-.. =-7... 1 ' „ =:-�,.-�•.• -I, :::=::- -- ! r i 1 TUKWILA. WASHINGTON rra,w•F.' la l--1 I I'�.':4.,. -,, .1 .«.......... ii.2,_,.' ' =1,2 :17..e t .I.. - .1i. 6 Ysw 1...4 • : ~rPU.t .r.M. --m ors .IL 1 1 Z Z cr) o 06OW Z O J W C Z w ~ t— 1 i 01111, . ! ir Walt 1.111, I 1 I I 0 MI6 1 /1 i 1 1 • 1 I 4 II, 0 i i 1 S1M NORTH ELEVATION N M '7MnM W Mi WaLY Ptiz Scale- 1' : 20' SITE ELEVATIONS 11¢2 me FLOW,. flU mfLEM .�1/ �M / .'r __t mnL -m L &OP -ry'-D S T/ or, M Mid110 0 1 = i rI Aka 77. ;Ii111W • Awn. �t) °� Z J b DP. i a NI ZW77 , N W .o , ,,. D. WEST ELEVATION • Scale- I' : 20' c ITTE■BERG, DELONY 8 DAVIDSON.1 Architecture Planning Interior Design ge 840 Savers Federal Building, Capitol & Spring Sts., Little Rock, Arkansas 72201, Telephone 501 - 376 -6681 PUBLIC NOTICE ADDRESS LABEL REQUIREMENTS ATTACHMENTS: 1. Property Owners Labels 2. Resident Labels 3. Assessors Vicinity Map KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS INICKPLIr :42.114.:37‘ ANERS�:�INTER •R • ,p • DD I Of SW 24 -23-4 SCALE 1.100' ..r REVISER HITE - GREEN RIVER NW 25-23-9 So NA. La A , ' TAX ASSESSMENT .PARCEL NO. PROPERTY OWNERS 0005800026 COMMERCE MTG. CO. P.O. BOX 4113 PORTLAND, OR 98349 0005800029 WHITNEY BROS P.O. BOX 459 i LAKE BAY, WA 98349 0005800033 NELSEN, HELEN B. 15643 W. VALLEY HWY. TUKWILA, WA 98188 0005800028 TAYLOR MELVIN R & TOUMA, MOUNT 15668 W. VALLEY HWY. TUKWILA, WA 98188 0005800025 KAUPAT, PETER H. P.O. BOX 88108 SEATTLE, WA 98138 0005800031 LOSEY SR, ROBERT F & WINONA M 808 SW 4TH PL RENTON, WA 98055 0005800009 OWRR & NAV CO. c/o UNION PACIFIC RR CORP P.O. BOX 2500 -' • BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 0005800030 NENDELS TUKWILA ASSOC. 2230 RUCKER AVE. EVERETT, WA . 98201 :4 ti 0005800008 PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT 7400 S. 158TH ST. TUKWILA, WA 98188 -4 • TAX ASSESSMENT 'PARCEL NO. RESIDENT LABELS TENANT 15802 West Valley Hwy Tukwila, WA 98188 NENDELS INN 15801 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA. 98188 CASCADE PACIFIC MORTGAGE 15668 West Valley Hwy. Tukwila, WA 98188 • UNION PACIFIC RR CORP 7301 South 158th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 EASY RIDER BOAT CO. 15666 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98188 MUELLER BRASS CO. INDUSTRIAL CRATING & PACKING 15470 Nelson Place S. P.O. Box 88299 Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98138 ATTN: PALMER ARZO HENRY LIEBMAN, ATTY. TENANT 1500 Tower Bldg. 15700 Nelson Road So. 7th & Olive Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98101 TENANT 7351 S. 158th St. Tukwila, WA 98188 TENANT 15813 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98055 DANIEL BOONE PAINT 15701 Nelson Place So. Tukwila, WA 98188 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ,Description of Proposal TO CONSTRUCT AN EIGHT STORY, 236 ROOM HOTEL WITH SEPARATE 3 - 4 STORY PARKING STRUCTURE Proponent GAFITC MANAGEMENT, INC, EMBASSY SUITES Location of Proposal, including street address, if any S.E. CORNER OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY /ION( rRFs WAY (s. 158TH STREET) IJVTERSECTION IN THE S.W * OF SEC. 24, TWN 23, RANI F 44 TIIKIALTLA, J4IA. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -16 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. 0 There is no comment period for this DNS (� This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date � Signature & ,,�,,/ You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hal l°, /200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the . basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS BELLEVUE OFFICE KOLL CENTER BELLEVUE 500 - IO8TH AVENUE N. E. SUITE 2100 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 TELEX:32-1087 FAX:(206)454 -5719 (206) 453 -1711 RICHARD U. CHAPIN BELLEVUE OFFICE LAW OFFICES OF FERGUSON & BURDELL 29T" FLOOR, ONE UNION SOUARE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 TELEX: 32 -0382 FAX: (206) 682 -6078 (206) 622 -1711 August 25, 1988 Mr. Ross Earnst City of ,Tukwilla Department of Public Works Tukwilla City Hall 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwilla, WA 98188 RE: Embassy Suites Dear Ross: ANCHORAGE OFFICE FERGUSON, BURDELL & RUSKIN RESOLUTION TOWER 1031 WEST 4TH AVENUE SUITE 500 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 FAX: (907) 272-1710 (907) 277 -1711 On behalf of Gaelic Management /Embassy Suites, I have been authorized to agree that in addition to the items specified in my letter to Vernon Umetsu of August 22, 1988, the applicant will perform the following: 1. The waterline across West Valley Road to the subject property will be a 12 inch rather than a 10 inch line, and 2. Pending construction of the improvements to be constructed as part of the LID for Nelson Place /Longacres Drive Basin Drainage Study as updated by the preliminary design report by KCM, the applicant will install a detention system and ditching as required by the City to direct surface water to the east connecting to the existing Longacres Track drainage pipe or channel. By providing the ditching to the Longacres pipe, the applicant will be relieved of future participation in Phase I of the LID. However, for Phases II and IIII of the LID the applicant will not protest the LID formation. Sincerely, FERGUSON & BURDELL By: RUC:cal 011 rRfrtLi4J Vl (21t1W■-* Richard U. Chapin • MEMORANDUM To: File From Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner RE: SEPA Embassy Suites Resolution of Public Works Concerns. Date: August 25, 1988 Information Items 1. Discussed Public Works SEPA concerns with Dean Powell over z the telephone early in the week of August 15th. Discovered that no significant progress had been made to formally resolve issues. Suggested he contact Public Works immediately to resolve issues. Powell was reminded that these issues must be resolved and a SEPA DNS issued before the B.A.R. could consider the project. 2. Talked with Powell on August 19th to discuss a draft agreement which would satisfy both Public Works amd •the developer; and allow Planning to issue a DNS. Powell ' objected to agreeing to provide all infrastructure necessary to serve the development to Public Works standards, as being too open ended. He said he would send me a copy of a letter they had already prepared to address Public Works issues. 3. • Talked with Ross Earnst on August 24th about developer's letter and satisfactibn of Public Works concerns. Earnst had not seen the letter, but considered it adequate to resolve issues except for the following: a. Change the 10 inch water line to a 12 inch line. b. Agree to install a storm drain system during construction per Public Works plans. A portion of this • cost would be credited back as part of their L.I.D. assessment +or an area-wide storm system. Phil Fraser should be contacted to provide more specifics. A letter embodying the appropriate agreements will be necessary. A meeting had been scheduled between Public Works and the developers for 1:00 p.m. this day, which the developers missed. They may have forgotten. 4. Called Richard Chapin on August 24th to convey this information. Chapin was out, so I told Robin McDaniel, Chapin's secretary the above; emphasizing that no B.A.R. review would be possible without a SEPA DNS. c c_ . �012 -Aerr BELLEVUE OFFICE KOLL CENTER BELLEVUE 500 - 108TH AVENUE N.E. SUITE 2100 BELLEVUE WA 98004 TELEX: 32-1087 FAX: (206)454 -5719 . (206) 453 -1711 RICHARD U. CHAPIN BELLEVUE OFFICE LAW OFFICES OF FERGUSON & BURDELL 29TH FLOOR, ONE UNION SQUARE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 TELEX: 32 -0382 FAX: (206) 682 -6078 (206) 622 -1711 August 22, 1988 Mr..Vernon Umetsu City of Tukwila Planning Department Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 ANCHORAGE OFFICE FERGUSON, BURDELL & RUSKIN RESOLUTION TOWER 1031 WEST 4TH AVENUE SUITE 500 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99501 FAX: (907) 272 -1710 1551-Z7+-1711 n1r1li�If,1 I7-7-7771 aU G 24- 1988 Re: Embassy Suites Dear Vernon: On behalf of Gaelic Management /Embassy Suites, I have been authorized to agree as follows: It is our understanding that based on the agreement of the applicant on the four points following, the City will issue either a DNS or an MDNS for the project known as "Embassy Suites Hotels ", for which an environmental checklist was dated July 1, 1988, and signed by me. The following items are hereby agreed to by the applicant in principle, with details to be worked out with the City: 1. The applicant will sign a "no protest" agreement as to the formation of an LID for stormwater, reserving the right to protest the amount of the assessment but waiving its right to protest the formation of the District. 2. The applicant will construct at the applicant's expense a right -turn lane to meet City standards, allowing northbound traffic on West Valley Road to turn east on Longacres way. 3. The applicant at its expense will construct a left -lane channelization meeting City requirements to provide for southbound traffic on West Valley Road to turn left and enter into the southerly -most entrance to the subject property. 4. The applicant will construct a 10" (ten -inch) (or such other dimension as is required by the City) waterline bringing water across West Valley Road to the subject property for use on the subject property and other properties provided that a latecomer's charge or developer's extension agreement • • Mr. Vernon Umetsu August 22, 1988 PAGE 2 will be entered into between the applicant and the City providing that the City will collect and refund to the appli- cant a fair -share charge to those properties that subsequently utilize the 10" line; and further that the applicant will pay its fair share of such agreements as may already exist for the cost of the line extended to its current location on the westerly side of West Valley Road. If there are any other issues that need to be discussed in connection with the City's special determination under SEPA, I would greatly appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, FERGUSON & BURDELL By: RUC:rlm Richard U. Chapin .CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM • CN EPIC — / 6- B 8 - FILE 624 f,4SSY Svcr J ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: TO: BLDG 0 PLNG P.W. 1 %A -IRE [ POLICE [.i & R PROJECT e7G{,64SS Scv r TeS LOCATION S6, 14 of wesr uu I EY N4 , "r-4 °S ,,./ Ailesecto4F I LE NO. /6— 8 8 DATE TRANSMITTED 7/s/88 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7 /6-2//4518 STAFF COORDINATOR !/ /,V (/,tler- v x - /8r$ RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ** It is felt that a properly designed lighting system will be the most important security feature to help create a safe and comfortable environment in•the parking garage facility. Due to the importance of lighting for security, the following minimum lighting levels are recommended, in accordance with standards set by the National Parking Association (1985) - Drive aisles 7- l0-footcandles - Bumper walls 1 -2 footcandles ** ** - Stair towers 30 footcandles - Elevator lobby 30 footcandles - High activity areas 50 footcandle: Tukwila Municipal Code 16.04.220, 16.04.230, & 16.04.240 list additional requirement: for security devices as they apply to Hotels. Seeattached::copy. During the planning stage of the parking garage the problem of non-customers parking in the garage and walking to the race track or the auction barn should be addressed as the police department has had problems of overflow parking onto S.R. #181 in the past which are now posted no parking areas. DATE 7/7/88 COMMENTS PREPARED BY Tan Kilburg C.P.S. Form 11 • •.04.200 -- 16.04.220 (b) When any default has occurred on the part of the principal under the preceding provisions, the surety shall have the option, in lieu of completing the work required, to demolish the building or structure and to clear, clean and restore the site to a natural condition. (Ord. 1393 §1 (part) , 1986) . 16.04.200 Relocation /demolition bond -- Refund of surplus on termination. The term of each bond posted pursuant to this chapter shall begin upon the date of the posting thereof and shall end upon completion to the satisfaction of the building official of the performance of all the terms and conditions of the relocation /demolition.permitirequired by this section and release of the bond by the building official. Such completion and release shall be evidenced by a statement thereof signed by the building official, a copy of which will be sent to the surety or principal upon request. When a cash bond has been posted, the cash shall be returned to the depositor or his successors or assignees upon the termination of the bond except any portion thereof that may have been used or deducted as elsewhere in the chapter pro- vided. (Ord. 1393 §1(part), 1986). 16.04.210 Washington State Energy Code adopted. The Washington State Energy Code, Chapter 51 -12 WAC, and all amendments thereto, is hereby adopted by this reference as if fully set forth. (Ord. 1393 §1(part), 1986). 16.04.220 Additional requirements for security devices. The following requirements shall apply to all apartment houses, hotels, and motels, provided that nothing in this chapter shall be construed to relieve any party from com- pliance with the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code: (.1) Entrance doors to individual housing units shall be without glass openings and shall be capable of resisting forcible entry equal to a wood, solid core door, one and three - fourths inches thick. This subsection shall apply in a structure constructed after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter. Any door replaced in existing structures must comply with this section. (.2) Every entrance door to an individual housing unit shall have a keyed, single - cylinder, one -inch deadbolt lock. The lock shall be so constructed that the deadbolt lock may be opened from inside without use of a key. In hotels and motels every entrance door to an individual unit shall also be provided with a chain door guard or barrel bolt on the inside. (3) Housing unit to interior corridor doors shall have a visitor observation port, which port shall not be in excess of one -half inch in diameter. 209 (Tukwila 8/86) • 16.04.230 -- 16.04.250 (4) In all apartment houses as defined in Section 16.04.230, lock mechanisms and keys shall be changed upon a change of tenancy. (5) All exit doors shall be openable from the interior without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. (6) Deadbolts or other approved locking devices shall be provided on all sliding patio doors which are less than one story above grade or are otherwise accessible from the outside. The lock shall be installed so that the mounting screws for the lock cases are inaccessible from the outside. (7) Subject to approval by the chief of police, locking devices may be substituted for those required in this section, provided such devices are of equal capability to resist illegal entry, and further provided that the installation of the same does not conflict with other requirements of this code and other ordinances regulating safety for exit. (Ord. 1393 §1(part), 1986). 16.04.230 Definitions. For the purpose of Sections 16.04.220 through 16.04.240, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "Apartment house" means any building, or portions thereof, which is designed, built, rented, leased, let, or hired out to be occupied, or which is occupied as the home or residence of three or more families living independently of each other and doing their own cooking in the said build- ing, and shall include flats and apartments. (2) "Hotel" means any building containing four or more guest rooms intended or designed to be used, or which are used, rented, or hired out to be occupied, or which are occupied for sleeping purposes by guests. (3) "Motel" means hotel as defined in this section. (Ord. 1393 §1(part), 1986). 16.04.240 Enforcement- -Right of entry. The building official is authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of Sections 16.04.220 through 16.04.240 for all new construc- tion. The chief of police is authorized and directed to enforce the provisions of Sections 16.04.220 through 16.04.240 for all existing buildings or premises, and upon presentation of proper credentials, the chief of police or his duly authorized representative may, with the consent of the occu- pant or pursuant to a lawfully issued warrant, enter at reasonable times any building or premises for the purposes of inspecting the physical security of exterior accessible openings of such building or premises. (Ord. 1393 §1(.part), 19.86). 16.04.250 Adoption of County Ordinance 451. King County Ordinance 451 entitled "an ordinance relating to and regulating the design, construction, equipping, operation, 210 (Tukwila 8/86) —CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: • CN EPIC - /6-88 FILE al SASSY Svcr -j TO: BLDG ri PLNG P . W. L -FIRE 1 1- POLICE F:4-P & R PROJECT e((,�j¢SS Y' Sv r Tg-S LOCATION SG, 4 of wesr vAccEY tewY/r -'4 °S r ,i, zsectJ I LE NO. /6- 9 8 DATE TRANSMITTED 7 /5"/8 8 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7 �/.2 /8 8 STAFF COORDINATOR Velutavy [/Ale-73'v X -/85-8 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE �/�� COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM: Ilk CN EPIC - /6— B 8 FILE ieAA SY Svc r -1 TO: 1 BLDG E] PLNG P.W. Q -HIRE I %- -POLICE 1 415 & R PROJECT e)(44(SS y SvrTES LOCATION �C, 4 DATE TRANSMITTED of Aiesr imccer Nt.)Y /T -4 °S ,Kr sect,,FILE NO. %6 — 88 7 /,Sj8 8 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7 4.2/8 S STAFF COORDINATOR (/ /4N ' 'v X -185-8 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S.•Form 11 • r �� 1 q-_,1-.._1)] / ..] , ai 11988 CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR EMBASSY SUITES HOTELS PREPARED BY THE FERRIS COMPANY July 1, 1988 rt.TY: FLAMING \1r ; ,,;: T. • IV( 142 : 6-Plc - /6 -86 £Ccc7PT M 4(35 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Embassy Suites Hotels 2. Name of applicant: Gaelic Management Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Gaelic Management, Inc. 2024 N. Woodlawn, Ste. 402 Wichita, KS 67208 Contact Person: Richard Chapin Ferguson & Burdell 500 108th Avenue NE Roll Center, Ste. 2100 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -1711 OR Dean B. Powell, Jr. Western American Development Co. 2011 E. Calle Mederas Mesa, AZ 85283 (602) 345 -0006 4. Date checklist prepared: July 1, 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist:, City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction would commence within approximately 90 days of receipt of permits; occupancy would occur within 12 to 16 months of construction initiation. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Lot line adjustment, design review, environmental (SEPA) review, sign permit, building permit, mechanical permit, utility permits. 2 • • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposal is for construction of an approximately 188,524 sq. ft., 8 -story hotel complex with 236 rooms, 1,778 sq. ft.- restaurant, 2,163 sq. ft.- kitchen, 2,700 sq. ft. of meeting area, two 500 sq. ft. -board rooms, 1,200 sq. ft.- lounge, recreational facilities and parking for 263 motor vehicles on an approximately 3.3 acre site (see site plan and ground floor plan). 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, King County, Washington. It is situated in the southeast quadrant of the South 158th Street (Longacres Way) /SR 181 (West Valley Highway) intersection (see attached legal description and site plan). 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan map as environmentally sensitive? No. 3 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0 to 2 percent slopes. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the 1973 King County Soil Survey, soils in the northwest corner of the site are classified as Urban Land (UR) and on the remainder of the site as Woodinville Silt Loam (WO). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading and compacting would be required to construct the building, parking areas and driveways. A balance of cut and fill would be sought, thereby eliminating the need to import or export material. However, some fill could be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some temporary erosion of soils could occur during construction, as existing vegetation is cleared and soils are exposed and disrupted. 4 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 84 percent of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces following construction. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary erosion control measures would be implemented pursuant to City of Tukwila requirements to reduce sediments and turbidity in stormwater runoff during clearing and grading activities. Landscaping and a permanent City - approved storm drainage system would be installed to control long -term erosion. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust, smoke, and pollutants (such as carbon monoxide) from construction machinery could be generated during construction. Vehicular traffic associated with the proposed hotel would produce pollutants on a long -term basis, and the hotel restaurant kitchen would produce some smoke. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. West Valley Highway to the west of the site, is a source of significant vehicular traffic and associated emissions. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust generated from construction activities could be limited by watering. Vehicular emissions would be reduced as Federal vehicular standards are enforced and older vehicles are replaced. 5 3. Water a. Surface: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Yes. The Green River is located to the west of the site, across the West Valley Highway. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Construction of a small portion of the proposed hotel parking lot could occur adjacent to the 200 feet distance from the Green River shoreline. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Some surface water diversion may occur with installation of the City- approved storm drainage system. The quantity of water and outfall position would be determined by the City. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not located within a 100 -year floorplain. According to the 1981 FEMA flood mapping, the site is located in Zone C where minimal flooding occurs. 6 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Stormwater runoff from roads and parking areas within the proposal would contain trace amounts of heavy metals, phosphorous and petroleum residues with slightly elevated water temperatures. Some greases and oils from restaurant operations and soluable fertilizer and pesticides from landscaping maintenance could also enter the runoff. The use of oil /grease traps and silt sumps in catch basins and standard risers in the detention system would filter out some of the pollutants prior to discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The site is served by sanitary sewers. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff would be generated by impervious surfaces within the proposal, such as rooftops, parking areas, sidewalks and driveways. Stormwater would be collected and discharged by means of a system approved by the City. 7 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Refer to surface water response 6. Stormwater runoff containing some pollutants could enter the groundwater in pervious areas. However, mechanical filtration would be incorporated in the storm drainage system to reduce the potential for impacts to ground and surface water quality. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Installation of temporary and permanent erosion control measures, and a permanent storm drainage system would reduce impacts to ground and surface water from siltation, turbidity, and pollutants. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other cottonwood _ Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs _ grass X pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing vegetation would be removed with construction of the proposal hotel. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Ornamental and native landscaping would be provided on approximately 16 percent of the site to enhance the building appearance and to provide buffering in perimeter areas, particularly along SR 181 (West Valley Highway). 8 5. Animals EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: small mammals, such as mice and squirrels fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Supplemental ornamental and native landscaping would provide habitat for certain wildlife species. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity would likely be the primary source of energy used for heating, lighting and other electric needs of the proposal. Gas may be used as a minor energy source. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal: List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Since the proposed hotel would incorporate shared wall construction, energy conservation would be realized. Individual room heating and ventilation devices would be shut off by front desk computers when guests check out. Construction of the proposal would also meet or exceed energy code requirements. 9 7. Environmental Health EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None required. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Some traffic, commercial, recreational and residential noise (i.e. from SR 181 and the Longacres Race Track) currently exists in the project vicinity. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long- term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short -term construction noise would occur during typical waking hours. Minor long -term noise would be expected from traffic and other activities associated with the proposal. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise would be properly muffled and limited to waking hours. 10 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The northwest corner of the property is currently occupied by a vacant gas station, which has been striped to serve as a pay parking area. The remainder of the site is in pasture. The site abuts the South 158th Street (Longacres Way) and SR 181 (West Valley Highway) rights -of- way to the north and west respectively. To the east is the Puget Sound Power and Light right -of -way. To the south is pasture, barn and attached, multi - family living quarters. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, pasture /grazing. -c. Describe any structures on the site. Abandoned gas station and paved parking area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The gas station and parking area. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2, Regional Retail Business. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. 11 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The general occupancy rate for the proposed hotel is estimated to be approximately 70 percent, or 165 rooms occupied at any given time. Approximately 35 .hotel employees plus restaurant workers would work at the hotel during the day and 5 hotel employees plus restaurant workers during the evening. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposal is consistent with the zoning classifica- tion and land use designation of the site. It is designed to be compatible with other regional service uses (i.e., hotels and restaurants) in the area. The proposed landscaping, building setbacks, and building height would contribute to this compatibility. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low— income housing. The proposal would contain 236 rooms for hotel patrons. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low— income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None required. 12 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • 10. Aesthetics EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The proposed hotel would be approximately 85 feet in height to the top of the roof and 100 feet in height to the top of the mechanical equipment. The hotel would principally be clad in a Dryvit or equal type material. All windows would be bronze framed and in bronze glass. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed landscaping, and building siting, massing and materials would control any aesthetic impacts. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposal would have exterior lighting in use from dusk until dawn. Certain surfaces, such as paved parking areas, would also produce glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off —site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior lighting would be shielded and directed to reduce impacts to adjacent properties. 13 • • 12. Recreation EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Bicentennial Park and Christensen Greenbelt are located to the southwest of the site along the Green River. Tukwila Park and Fort Dent Park are located to the north of the site, across Southcenter Boulevard. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposal would include a swimming pool, jacuzzi, sauna and small weight room for the use of hotel patrons. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Any significant historical or cultural discoveries made during construction would be reported to the proper authorities. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site would be from one point on South 158th Street (Long Acres Way) and from two points on SR 181 (West Valley Highway). 14 • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit service is available at the South 158th Street (Longacres Way) /SR 181 (West Valley Highway) intersection adjacent to the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project would eliminate 51 public parking spaces, and would provide 263 spaces for patrons, pursuant to the cooperative parking proposal approved by the City on June 23, 1988. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). A right -turn lane will be required northbound from SR 181 (West Valley Highway) at its intersection with South 158th Street (Longacres Way). The proponent has agreed to finance this right -turn lane and other necessary frontage improvements on SR 181 (West Valley Highway) and South 158th Street (Longacres Way). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. BNSF Burlington Northern and C.M. St. P. & P. railroad tracks are located to the east of the site, between the site and the Longacres Race Track. f.- How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 4th Edition rates for typical hotels, the completed project would generate approximately 2,053 average daily trips (based on 8.7 ADT per room) and 165 a.m. and 165 p.m. peak hour trips (based on 0.7 peak hour trips per room). However, the proposal would likely generate fewer trips as a result of its proximity to the Sea -Tac Airport. There could be as much as a 60 percent reduction in trips as a result of the airport shuttle service. Also, guest arrivals and departures would not necessarily correspond to typical peak periods. 15 • • g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The proposed right -turn lane required northbound from SR 181 (West Valley Highway) at its intersection with South 158th Street (Longacres Way), parking, frontage improvements and off -peak patterns of guest arrival and departure would control transportation impacts associated with the proposal. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Minor increases in typical public service demands would result from the project. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Increased property taxes resulting from development of this site would offset minor increases in the need for public services. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and sanitary sewer would be provided by City of Tukwila, power by Puget Power, natural gas by Washington Natural Gas, and telephone by Pacific Northwest Bell. All utilities could be provided to the site with the extension of existing lines. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make j.ts decisi.on.l Signature: Date Submitted: Ikp EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY eaN .611)Pi 16 1 • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON— PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objectives of the proposal are: o To provide first class hotel accommodations for the Tukwila area, convenient to regional shopping, recreation and transportation opportunities. o To propose a hotel complex compatible with other hotel and regional service development in the immediate vicinity. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? The proponent conducted a site evaluation study for the proposed hotel and determined that there was no available vacant land that would meet the objectives outlined in response 1 above. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? The proposal is in compliance with applicable policies from the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. are: Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) None required. 17 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No. 46, Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, lying east of the easterly line of State Highway No. 5M (S.R. 181) known as West Valley Highway, and west of the westerly line of the Puget Sound Power and Light Co. Right -of -Way (Sea -Tac P.S.E. Railroad), south of the south line of Road Easement known as South 158th Street and also known as Longacres Way and north of a line 446.38 feet south and parallel, when measured at right angles, to said South line of South 158th Street, containing 142,551.45 sq. ft. (3.273 acres). This property is subject to an easement along the easterly 15 feet from north to south for water (10 ft.) and sewer (5 ft.) purposes. —_T + 0070 Rvr. 4. GREEN R V E N OMAR roof nor. Wm rev N — N 1_41' 3D: • 011(. THIS SLWY(Y IS 0-2(0 TO CORRECT SUAVE? 04(0 IN ROOK •7. PAN (/O OF SCIIY(Y( MOM AUDITORS FN( NO. IS0KMOI3. ----- — —r ti kl !. 1 ) S.R. 1811 WEST VALLEY ROAD) BASIS OC R(ARINGS } STATE 5OIDIAM I NOTE• POTLLW USED IS 00.44 M(NCN MARK 0-40M%MIS' MISS MS SET PERT/CALLE IN SOLON FACE OF 00 COLLO. Or /-403 01209540 CN059M6 OF SR /RI (1(15.. 1•730' • • NOTE: WEST L/M OF 1..SI.2. CO. RAW P.S.E. RT. I ESTI& IVIED ,sr WEST OF • ONION PACIFIC TRACKS DESCRIPTION 72.7 P007100 PO *Oar MAIM 00414701 (IMO M. 9,W wCnt 0x ere∎ mar of 2007 rurI*r Lot smrO 9,070 01 SO I U. RIO NM OF nor •001(.* • LOS Or ITC Mal? COMMO 7000} lifffr rxr M Of I0w (INN(ir rInN/As 1W ~N SOWN Ow.0000�Y MVO Op. 071101444.01 !((1,OOIT I.O iM (l0.. Ow W Y 00.01(0.1 OIr TO, re SAO SOWN tor Of mat, OIM 077,477 Ci1O//OO/O11 14;J(L44 so", 0./1 /) /rl Amer, l Existing Trees To Be Removed . 41 M/0%WL 300 ACRE LINE ROE) 001011050 I LOOP CO 0/■ I Pff. MOM. / RECORDING CERTIFICATE OMOMO ROT. Or RCMOeI malF ,■ roes t..w a ao. T..ele(oe fan" COO trascraor •30o4orrr S ray. IS' ( ••233• SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE owl., or omitriCoo C04,00•614. Waft IOC OCOLMArlarlrl Of for sifoOr Alt.&NU. 9,C LMI If 100 Ne4fJ10r ClOTIFICI,II J.1;• UTILITY INFORMATION Ye. Io70.se11.o w h.. 00111,04. 10011.1.. r 0029, 71. 1.11 0x0.. e to Mt M 1011 1110, ra01q .>.t.t.b LW' tutu H. the n0rthse1t .0. nn) 11.. It is else .r 15.2440100 that ten It • 10' woe Nees on the oast .I1, 100 Pee 11.1100 0 101 (lint 7.110 MMNV)• I. resent I.9, 1. to 9,x01.0 1,1. Into to 10 11. for .M.o to err 0...n). 101 east M this 01«10 Mil 00 seated eat .le le 0011, 0000 alt sewn) wan 00InIItlq Iron this ....ea Of Nov.. In the era. Ten It also. 1L' 11. 01th10 to 10' .n .mot ea the out ebb M oar Wwn): the no al this Ilse 0111 00 egl.. for this pe}Ct else. M r tear limo rw.I. al.. the n.lh 009, of e7 . _1. 1,1, Ise a IT 1111 . to north. cow. O ur 02272). Is le 11. w e. *1041. 4. Int, 0070 .111 • 1,• b e b•l•r. 110,. 2.lw. 00s e. W. 1111111. Nwwr. se 0111 Inn .Ise 00 C1., e aeceNllsh to est ednatwus ernn0w0C for hash asrtin, r.ellrlq ten a 00.2144477 0.1. Mort of to el... rle0./eep.a ILO ,ten Oral.. 1201. erq 1980 Is 001!0 rasl.ed by lea City 0.770.•1,. IS. 158ThST.T J.W. I /4, J.W. I /O, 0 SL. I/O. 3071/4. MC. 14. TEXAN. (M1ETN .1 OILER CL E 2.5 C1 - (53 • 1030 O. MK ((3R RENTO11 WASHINGTON MOM 7 L/RVEY OF PORTION OF THE HENRY MEAGER D.C.NO. 46 IN SEC. 24, T. 23N., R. 4E. W.M. KING COUNT N WASHINGTON • FOR: HELEN B. NELSEN II O•✓.•.Iwn.NHOOe 1;d :150/3 _NBE DEL•NY & DAVIDSON IN 4 SR 181 WEST VALLEY DRIVE Sao' PROJECT SUMMARY HOTEL Ground Lovell 7 Floors (2 -91 36,575 at 151,049 at TOTAL 166,524 d GSA /Room 796.6 at/rear SrTE SIANIIARY 8M Area 142,561 of Larsleoge 25,427 d. 17.714 LANDSCAPE Perketg 263 PARKING SPACES AREA PARKING CALCULATIONS Ground Floor Reetevem Milan Lounge 11e.Sng Rooms (31 Bcerdroon» (21 Atrlum i Ancillary Space 1,775 d 2,163 at 2,000 If 000 at 500 d 29,234 at TOTAL 36,575 d 12 -81 Ow (toed room (2361 151,949 d 11101111•••• •••••••••• •••••••••••• ESIISMISIIMIIIIIINISIS IIIII Mill IM SI gralgrIS SIiSISISISISISISISI■SISISIii ................ SISISISISISISISiS1SISISf mSISISISISIm LOT SIZE & COVERAGE Gross Site Ares HoM (IOId Oford 142,551 at 36,207 d Podding Dank 30,916 d Net Ste Area P.ting Count 263 Spices ...— 1_- - io' P(121 L.04E EST E M B A S S Y S U I T E S H O T E L TUKWILA WASHINGTON 10 20 40 7 73,428 d v TTENf3ERG. DELONY & DAVIDSON. IN EMBASSY SUITES F y 1 • • Li 117=1 11: C:21 :CD 17:1 n-A. LLD: = --u•0000000-ri: •=t L • - 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • rr rrri o n o 0 0 0 0 EL 0 I 0.:010 010 0 0i0 I_ 0 0 0 0 0.0 —11.0144 GEO( term. —4. rcucx DX.K. South Elevation EMBASSY SUITES TUKWILA, WASHINGTON tow:: rALL. 004007:0. . 0CNAP.)4 (12. 0" 1000 IUI74 000 1=1.P1 FT 17 = C=1 1J = TED L1_11 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 00 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0,0:0' 1=111=1 =TlitilIFET71 1111 'OR uuuui ihd 4- ) MICEM1===EM a d> _150,:v&T t— met,. of."00. NAL, East Elevation Parldng Deck EMBASSY SUITES TUKWILA, WASHINGTON • VITTENBERG. DELONY & DAVIDSON INC NI NOSGInd4 '8 ANO1]a '92139N sir,___T—UrINN NOISNIHSVM VUMaL MUMS ASSVEGAS 2/1.0441 WM00 101111101 11011DAK3 ISOM MEN I ... Ws 1r alimilin Eli iiii son N. n .. ■ III MI wilM■m'''' MN MII MI MI .. MN ® a u cminsi . am cim =Km .•. ... ... ... .••... BM •NI MI MI EV 11011.111111 IDH:11010 0 -1:3i01010 04 NM din MP. Ili ilMINIMIlililili III MIN" liiii Iiiiii Ili iiiiiiiiiiiiii Illiai !Mini NM ilin ili itiljaill iii ili Ili Ming um Ili iii Ili iii Milli Ili Ili ill MOH dui IT.Z.Nlarn iiiiiisimumaniii MN ck- 131011 MUM ASSVOING laler<<Jo INVOR,L1 VOW, 1.1A4C1 vo-o'D :2/444 ---1-M<Ntfair) I-.N -scrco.-2./44:1 tICXISNIFISVAA VllMfl.L SaLlf1S ASSVERV:1 uoIPAG13 'WON )10eQ BUMmd L4- --- < > 1 • •,•• 11 1 11 11 • • • 0 . CD- pm. 11.1. In* I son Pm...pm. - amem. - PP. Pawns **am . ■•■■a. SR 181 WES 1 VAL L EY OR1V • IONCACRES WAY• NORTH rElignam-- EMBASSY SUITES LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN SCALE', I" = 20' PeAwiNc, e.y .; 52...0 7-/-6 APPROVED DY: HENDRIKUS SCI-IRAVEN Landscape Construction & Design Inc. (206) 322 8977 A. BACKGROUND • C � r,, atES C N- : GPI c -16 -88 kace ' /Pr 4r 3S 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Embassy Suites Hotels 2. Name of applicant: Gaelic Management Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Gaelic Management, Inc. 2024 N. Woodlawn, Ste. 402 Wichita, KS 67208 Contact Person: Richard Chapin Ferguson & Burdell 500 108th Avenue NE Koll Center, Ste. 2100 Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -1711 OR Dean B. Powell, Jr. Western American Development Co. 2011 E. Calle Mederas Mesa, AZ 85283 (602) 345 -0006 4. Date checklist prepared: July 1, 1988 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction would commence within approximately 90 days of receipt of permits; occupancy would occur within 12 to 16 months of construction initiation. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None to our knowledge. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Lot line adjustment, design review, environmental (SEPA) review, sign permit, building permit, mechanical permit, utility permits. nx4,11 1�- c 1e ch'od ( 1210(c.04,5- 2 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0 to 2 percent slopes. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the 1973 King County Soil Survey, soils in the northwest corner of the,site are classified as Urban Land (UR) and on the remainder of the site as Woodinville Silt Loam (WO). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities / //' of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of 0(7� fill. iLR crs�l ✓o ll�y .441/ s Grading and compacting would be required to construct py the building, parking areas and driveways. A balance of cut and fill would be sought, thereby eliminating the need to import or export material. However, some fill could be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some temporary erosion of soils could occur during construction, as existing vegetation is cleared and soils are exposed and disrupted. 4 cot eile5 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The northwest corner of the property is currently occupied by a vacant gas station, which has been striped to serve as a pay parking area. The remainder of the site is in pasture. The site abuts the South 158th Street (Longacres Way) and SR 181 (West Valley Highway) rights -of- way to the north and west respectively. To the east is the Puget Sound Power and Light right -of -way. To the south is pasture, barn and attached, multi - family living quarters. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, pasture /grazing. c. Describe any structures on the site. Abandoned gas station and paved parking area. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The gas station and parking area. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY D.e4#t0 vax01 /4- 4ji 1' e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2, Regional Retail Business. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. 11 PROJECT SUBJECT CE NTIRAC ASSOCIATES WEST vht -c.Ey 4PIEET: I BY • '1M M OF 2- DATE CHECKED: 71-er- DATE ls /s/ 1+0 L JOB NO. 86 t1 -133 8 PM P A.K LOS sum ri M31: SQ -181 C d S - s M3 ► P1' 512- I 8 S.isa C(.446 ceS) CASE. EXtST1 Is) G Co'J )tTlDos- (A SS w,..a S 0-10140.7 4.0...J.11,1„.44.„„) - 0 V ELA -tc_ 2Ts o,J N(3 t�fr C5R -Ist) - sp T14au Cs.--(81) E8 t4-'r Cs- '5,wr►P) Fu Tit 11' 88) vitor1.4 t3R,o7Et.T w/o LMPvTI. (e,c,ett E L) - 0 V.R -ALI. T r/T $ t✓of l o.. +� Q l i f i F - T aft-i E l ) - St3 T 4R.0 Cs2 -te i) - E-8 l 6P Gr s RAP) FuTue,E. 0,88) w 17 PlUSEcr +3 MB /SO ¶ut, 52481 e -405 -14.0 A044 572-181Q. s_ ► s 8T-. Y c "D ec.#41 LOS Lo 3 u/ P____ s PZ) 1.01 34.8 /.o3 53. to (.04 52.9 0 -81 58.6 I. 05 . 1.t2 {.15 0.78 59.8 FIt` 7. Z Fir 98.3 Fir 32.3 C,'D - 0 vf.RM L zr✓►^areC o,.) 0.94- ' 37.5 EA. - N4 VE,c-r- (sit -(8( ) 0.97 33.9 qP - S8 `€ ,v (sk -te() 1.06 60.4- VE, E$ t (Ar-i- :(. =-405 1#'►19 6.1C __30.7 a/c) FVTt/tc (t5e8) ovi't$ Pto r +3tss8 + Nt3 Tt.p.� GvEkAt t. nob..) - we. r e4 r" (5e -t e t ) - S8 ptit,U (S2 -19L) - t`-f3 t/EPC Cz-s RN'MP) 0.94 b. 97 0.94 83 298 39-9 37-5 36.6 0.71 C 049 We 0.69 alc- E/D 0.69 tj' P/D •HEET: - OF Z CENT ZAC BY: "tiN DATE ASSOCIATES CHECKED', 714- . DATE 5"/t7 PROJECT S E-E P- JOB NO. 8611- 133 SUBJECT .5k -1$!O -4o5 Ne ItAtipr s12 -(81 s 1S8'� CA-5 E /c D Los- as 5C F uTu -E (14)39) Weil; wLO C-r + 3ERNe/sr3 + Spe_ri Ew(4.0) - 0 vER A m orJ 0.99 4-1.0 Eli 0 -C, 9 - N6 („£ Pr (32. -481) /-02.- S4.6 E/E - s 4) 7+,v (5A-18t) 1.'01 5-0-0 o E/E_ - F-15 4.6pr (L-4-06. ate) o.9 9 no.o F/F - LAA3 L r/Tl c1(NEw TO 0.7G 46.3 c /1: FUTN 0(588) w' Pgi 3As waiS4L r, 9/0 NE4500 D- Pv1S (3 f6) - OVER '“- r - o.•.) 0 98 39-S- 0.76 cifl — Ng 1,f,pr (sQ -161) 0.98 39 4- E-/7 - S 8 U CS01.-1 /. 06 6o.° WE E$ (Aspr C-- tr-orop) -0 -°)0 43 -7 - D/E 8/c 0 1r /Z. (fy88) wTl. ft- o3C- -c1 2g-r /0o - War ■/o S2-t 91 Tr,pyrr. - ovfl2ALL . y, jZ-Sfi Er,Tlo I. 0 -88 N. A- ^ 'TABLE 9 -1. LEVEL -OF- SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTER- SECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE STOPPED DELAY PER VEHICLE (SEC) A 5.0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F > 60.0 0,74- C $o v(t.G4:- 19e S 141 Ci4 C-kP A--C r1 el/MAW,/ SE (.7104 9 -4- . CHECKED DATE - - - - 7/I//i3G •CATION _ ��ill _in/<>'rs'• Joe No. _ 6_I t -133 _ &4C' .0 r o.doc 4te4. Tae. . -- Engineers • Architects • Planners PZD. 1 1137 A INTERSECTION 5(2.-16I Cw. ve ,e .) 0 a-_--1-05 N13 / ti Pl L oc . No. 1095 DO N8 I*-►P! ` rn ...Xf !1 R 5HEE°r of 3 FG 4F; TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM NeM2lL 9[7o TIME PERIOD 3= I6--- `1-: -lS-1+I DAY 4 DATE 5.{__6/24186 L I INDIcATE NORTH WtTti ARROW 5r -t 81 @ -5 158' CO t 44.71 - Der. PED. -1L13 3 7.6j -.., 118211 A 1507 to rn Qo N �i. EKE ST d6- PM PF c ((,006-A-e/ca s6) TIME PERIOD -3= 15-- 4="ta'PNl DAY 4 DATE 1"14 -. 6/3418c c5 C1 0 . J ) 1 80 20 �? '30 LTJ COI yriry ef v+ xn 3/76 t q TION ZU ►cwt - G J_ - _ L4? PRo.1ELT 1ves..f. Vi l't!(4f CI-i C K L- D .DATE • Joe No. _ � it -f 33 _ BY --- 31-V86 cdtPute - _- Engineers • Architects • Planners 1 5HEE'r 0F 3 0 R 7A `tf INTERSECTION 5R-- 1$1(t.yr 1Rte) T—y-o S r 1 Loc. No TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM Nei %L 9/70 TIME PERIOD Pm FA"t- oAY 4 DATEaci I'9`elt INDICATE NORTH WITH ARROW S2 --t81� S.tS &! 1 (367) t•--L-Boc.f2J f co -•-• _L-7---_C-7..Vict -- LZt97: 11770 A. 1 421 TIME PERIOD M. /F-Aft" DAY 4 DATE fr toA-41 f 58 -4o 110 riepo LT.) 5 0 t5 13 toll f43118..(7. CH Ci; D .DATis 3Y _ _ 51fr- _ 7d,e(sc, 'acATloN PRoJEc, _ I,✓E31 _ Jos No. 8G11- -133 _ uric ,1aoeuatca.9ac. -• • • - —• Engineers • Architects • Planners . 5HE 3_- INTERSECTION SR -t %(. (w -vim RD) C� r—I-0 5 r•43 P-Anp/ Loc. No I--tw 5 u6 x215% _t o 9; 1 1.162 ql 1140'41f . — 4r. TURNING MOVEMENT DIAGRAM Ne ..=IL 9 /7c TIME PERIOD P. P rIC DAY 4 DATE tiVEkelCaki (fe ! _1ft �.1 Of LT- 1 INDICATE NORTH W►TH ARROW 52.-1 G S T$$ - - -. V'1 -4 - -L3 39 3� 1 test 1 987 wI INA PP-oncr RT iJ /vim @ z TIME PERIOD PNA- P6'L DAY 4 DATE 44(- P/ ti 9' k 0� - 00 1 04-1 j (844 -":249:a1}- 17fVrfm Sips y'y 1 CENTRAC ASSOCIATES PROJECT wesf Valle SUBJECT Tiro fir. A ?a1_ s i s SHEET: / OF BY : 144Y DATE -7//Aato CHECKED: DATE JOB NO ' !f -133 TRl P 6ENEP1 flo'I l5D Hvmc.. ft, •rz s &-r/ch l ./o 714 PEAK our /0. 5 7Z -Ae_ TRAPS /575 87 44 54 5!v i7 /p Dis7,&,ria•.! PER FiU. 5 141141.1PrO4 a•-1=7:› • • '1\6t0,5€e7 c ae,6. )(5\-- AP7A-tiboe Resident Labels TENANT 15802 West Valley Hiway Tukwila, WA 98188 HELEN B. NELSEN 15643 West Valley Hiway Tukwila, WA 98188 Easy Rider Boat Co. 15666 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98188 CASCADE PACIFIC MORTGAGE 15668 West Valley Hiway Tukwila, WA 98188 DANIEL BOONE PAINT 15701 Nelson Place So. Tukwila, WA 98188 DANIEL BOONE PAINT CO. 15701 Nelson Place So. Tukwila, WA 98188 PUGET SOUND POWER &-LIGHT 7400 So. 158th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 TENANT 7351 So. 158th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 TENANT 15700 Nelson Road So. Tukwila, WA 98188 Tax Assessment Parcel No. - -- #000580 0024 --- #000580 0009 - -- #000580 0004 - -- #000580 0030 - -- #000580 0025 - -- #000580 0033 - -- #000580 0028 - -- #000580 0026 - -- #000580 0035 - -- #000580 0008 - -- #000580 0031 - -- #000580 0029 UNION PACIFIC RR CORP. 7301 South 158th Street Tukwila, WA 98188 NENDELS INN 15801 West Valley Hiway Tukwila, WA 98188 TENANT 15813 West Valley Road Tukwila, WA 98055 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter BLVD. Tukwila, WA 98188