The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-17-88 - CITY OF TUKWILA / PUBLIC WORKS - 1989-1999 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLANCITY OF TUKWILA SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (1989 -1999) CITY -WIDE EPIC 17 -88 WAC 197 -11 -970 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Adopt a City•of Tukwtla Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan as required by State Statute and support the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Proponent Tukwila Public Works Department. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any City -wide. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -17 -88 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. al There is no comment period for this DNS' [[ This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Responsible Official Rick Beeler. Position /Title Address Date July 5, 1988 Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard T Signature r; .8 e#-A I ■gd 8 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS A. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No. Epic File No. 17.88 Fee $100.00 Receipt No. Atoofct- �v / A 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: C� /T?'' 174111,,LA /fitetS r Q,4,0` 2. Name of applicant: Gi% ' o1r 7 4w4i .gi.iec /t.34. c 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person; l ,4 %u u►c G� 4131-0 4. Date checklist prepared: 7 — /—/ 5. Agency requesting Checklist: *City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule, (in luding phasing, if applicable): /t,i...— Gel"/ �x�� , .?u.1-j /fare, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or c nnected with thi; proposal? If yes, expl . in. JL-e'k - • o c �� - n-� % S D 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. See, A.7. /u d_s 4-4-714'v�l�+1A.�"a -� — w hew p ., ,, 5.�, `�t -s. 9. Do you know: whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals, .dlrectly affectin the property cover y your propos 1? , If yes explain. '2 - A 7. 4,47,-.74j ?/P s-ea, e / / /Jp''.'�•/f�se//c.�r.�us . 10. Lisp to any governme t approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project,and site. There are several questions later in thi . checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized 'Here. A. 7, 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. c�z-y . 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? _ 574e.-01$.7, .t. ,t, -3- ' TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. Generar description of the site (circle one): Flat, r fling;: hilly/, steep+ 1 pes, mountainous, other ict 5 -frees 5T : 7D t !/ .ceap r b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)L 2007. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ALL -ryves d.. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. y.s. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.. SCA-- A,7.. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use ? - If so, generally describe. q.s -d4.7. g. About< llat percent of the site will be covered with impery OuS.. surfaces after project construction (for exaMpreiNiphalt or buildings)?U4(.644014. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Sce . 4,7. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 5e e 4,7% b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. See /4.7. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Sae, A ,7, 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide_ names. If appropriate, state stir a I:or. riyeroit flow into. raw der 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. )6s, see 4,7 • 4,9. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Ingicate the source of fill material. See 4, % oCrf. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. See. A.7. 1 hit 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. yes. Ste ,( .7',4.4. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 4o. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Sec 1' 4.7 ,(.. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Vow c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into A other waters? If so, describe. See , 7 /A•J. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. yes, See- A7 A,e• d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: ,See A. 7 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: /deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other /evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other /shrubs /grass _ pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of egetation will be removed or altered? .me, 41,7 ,O.P. c. List-threatened or endangered species known to be on or near-the' site. See.- 1 A4, Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or en h nce vegetation on the site, .if any: Se 4,7, f 4,e, 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. See- 4,1 . 4, 8. c. Is the site part of a migr tion route? If so, explain. toT Sit 4, 7. 4.8. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: S& 4,7 f A,e Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed.: project's energy needs? Describe whether it will=' b used or heating, manufact ring, etc. 01-74- sir .4-e y4 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by_�} djacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: See 4,7 7 4,i 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. _leur. ,S, 7 f 4 P. 1) Describe special emerges y services that might be required. See. 40,1 4.47 arwm • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Sew A.7/.4./ Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What_types of noise exist in the area which may affect= your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? _See. 01.11..;e 4d 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours n ise would come from the site. SSG A, 7 f fA. �• 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Se m, �, 7 (1 d1, 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use f the site and adjacent properties? See, A 7 14-4, b. Has the site been us for agriculture? If so, describe. See_ . 4.7 (,1.' c. Descrlbk.any structures on the site. lee- ,1. 7 f442 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? See- A.7fI.oc e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Ste, 4.7 f 4d. f. What is the current corprehensive plan designation of the site? ,5;_e A7 )r,0,4 If applicable, what is the current shoreline aster program designation of the site? .5N:- A. 7. .1. h. Has anyy part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sepsitive" area? If so, specify. yeas, Sec 4, 7 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Moen. _ a; 7 /Apt' j. Approximately how many people � uld the completed project displace? eAy . , . k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: See- ,9, 7 e 44. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:_ Ste- 4,7 4.t Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicpte whether high, piddle, or low - income housing 4Jci& . ..See. 47 Q .AP, b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing.. Sic- A.7 1.4.d c. Proposed measures to reduce or c ntrol housing impacts, if any: Ale--tte. .Sec 41, 7 ,e 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Sc� At, /7 f,4.i b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ,�` A. 7 t i d0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impact 1f any See, ,41, 7 f .f. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce ?. What time of day would it mainly occur? 5e4.-4.7f i,f b. Could light or glare from the finished project _be, safety hazard or interfere with views? See. 4. 7 1,1. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? .Sec, 47 q, e d. Proposed measures to reduce or cons/ryof light and glare impacts, if any: See- 4. 7 /rife(' 12. Recreation a. What . designed and informal recreational o por- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? See of,7 �1 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. S� �4�7 1,4.! c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the,project or applicant, if any: .54e,.7 ' Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Sew 4, 7 / 4 c b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to b on or next to the site. See 4.7 r A.e c. Proposed measures o reduce or control impacts, if any: Se.4 Ail 4, e 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. how on si e plans, if any. StG 441) 4, If/ A aG 4 . b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distanceo the nearest transit stop? LJt.r,GS . Ste, A, 7 Ai. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? , HOW:man would the project el iminate? 1/a , s Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). WS. SGe� e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. y s, S0.t, Q, 7J A,d� 1 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See, 4. - r� /1,'. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: ,e.� A,77 10},x, 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, school, other)? If so, generally describe. 54e, 4,1 4,1. b. ProposeeT : measures to reduce or control di t impactSotl publ is services, if any. Std ,7 , 4' 16. Utilities Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity; natural gas, water, refuse service, te)aephone sanitary s wer, septic,. system, pther. V trie$. 4sc.[ ov- � � .4, 7 t 1.�'• b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 4,1 ? 4i C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: c,y71 4 1 Date Submitted: 7-C-de PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in,conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the . proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and_in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic o •zard•us substances; or prod cti of noise? a-v-e. . - A.7 A Proposed measur s to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect lants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? ,5z.2, A,'7. 4i. e. Proposed ,measures to protect or conserve pl ts, ani- mals, fish or marine life are: $744., 4, 7 4 ,�, P Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? .tom of. 7 9 of 4 Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Sea_- 4.7 '4d 4. Now would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, lands , floodplains, or prime farmlands? (':?.,(t..e,ra -Y rr,.�.�.r�e.Q� • - fie_ 4,7 ¢ I. #, Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Se-c� A, 7. .,¢,g, 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline:,use, .inclduing whether it would allow or encourage,:gTand!: or shoreline uses incompatible with existing s ?" �� 4(7 q.1, Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Sew 11(7(4,1 How does the propos¢1 conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 5iS.k-4, f4,8, 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase dema ds on transportation or publ is services and u i 1 i- ties ? 5 44 d . -, /. i / N.G� Larl / _ y J � I , i. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: IJ/A- 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Sec i.-7 1 q.t Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 14A, TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives,-and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a.proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items_ of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? %� 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: p /* • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land .IJse Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plant /QOM/ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Ail/4k- -23- 5I1 YEAR TRANSPORTATION INPROVENENT PRO6RAN 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA CITY NO. 1320 COUNTY NO. 17 HEARING DATE 06 -27 -88 ADOPTION DATE 07 -05 -88 RESOLUTION N0. P R 0 R T Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK N 0 F1 U: PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS N C N: F- A AD: U JO R 1: NC OF R 111 EXPENDITURE PLAN CL R Y 61 TA M TOTAL 0 : FOR ALL FUNDIN6 TYPES : 11 : 1 2ND IS CO MORK V S: TOTAL 1 11 1 1ST YR: OS LR LNSTH E T1 1 :: : 1 THRU N AK CODE R Al 1 3RD & 1 5TH & :1 1 ANNUAL: A 5 T1 1ST : 2ND 1 4TH : 6TH 1 : LOCAL :RAP /UAB:FEDERAL:: 1 1 6TH L S X U: YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEARS : YEARS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS I FUNDS 1: : ELENT.1 5. 1 : : 1 : : : 11 1 : YEARS SOURCE OF FUNDS FEDERAL 11 OBLIGATION PLAN 11 1 NINKLER BLVD Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park West Neu 4 -lane street w /traffic signals at SC Parkway and Andover Park West. 19 1 ABDF 0.38 X P $2,360 $2,360 $2,360 P.E. R/M CONST. + TOTAL $0 $0 2 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD 16 1 ABDF 0.28 X P $528 $4,036 $4,036 $8,600 $3,465 $1,100 $4,035 P.E. $268 T -Line Bridge - Grady Nay Bridge R/M $100 Widen to 5 lanes on new alignment with new bridge over 6reenRiver, structure CONST. $3,667 undercrossing I -405 ramps, new Signal and channelization at Interurban Ave. * TOTAL $0 $4,035 3 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 14 2 ABDF 0.16 X P $1,814 $1,814 $563 $1,251 P.E. 52nd Ave. S. - 42nd Ave. 5. R/M Widen to 5 lanes. CONST. * TOTAL $0 80 4 57th Avenue South 16 2 ABDF 0.50 X P $786 $613 $1,399 $770 $629 P.E. S. 180th St. - South City Limits R/M Widen to 4 or 5 lanes. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 5 STRANDER BLVD. EXTENSION 16 1 ABDF 0.28 X P $112 $413 $7,522 $8,047 $1,699 $6,348 P.E. W. Valley Hwy (S.R. 181) - Dakesdale (Renton) R/M New 5 -lane arterial with separated grade crossing railroad tracts. (joint CONST. project w /Renton) 6 KLICKITAT DRIVE 19 3 8DF6 0.30 X P $129 At 1-5 southbound on-ramp. Add southbound left -turn lane and new sidewalk from 53rd AveS. to 1 -5. 7 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALKS All public streets in the CBD. Construct sidewalks $129 $129 9 A6 P $232 $148 $392 $554 $1,326 $1,326 +.TOTAL $0 $0 P.E. R/M CONST. + TOTAL $0 $0 P.E. RIM CONST. + TOTAL $0 $0 SIX TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE CITY NO. 1320 ADOPTION DATE COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION NO. June 20, 1988 Page 2 F' U: PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS 1: FEDERAL P M C NI R F A A D1 1: OBLIGATION PLAN I U JO R It I 1 :: 0 :' - NC OF R N: EXPENDITURE PLAN 1 : :1 R ^�f.<<aF�. CL R Y 61 1 1 SOURCE OF FUNDS :: 1 � TA Y TOTAL 0 1 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES , T IS CO WORK V SI : TOTAL 1 1 :. Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LN6TH E T: : : 1: N AK CODE R A: : 3RD & 1 5TH 1i 1 :: N A S 11 1ST : 2ND 1 4TH 1 6TH : 1 LOCAL :RAP /UAB :FEDERAl1: 0 L S X U: YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEARS 1 YEARS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS 1: S' ' 11 1 2N0 1 1ST YR: : I THRU : ANNUAL: : 6TH ELEMT.I : YEARS 8 ANDOVER PARK EAST @ MINKLER BLVD. SIGNAL 16 6 HI 0.10 X P $138 $138 123 $115 P.E. $17 Andover Park E. @ Minkler Blvd R/N Intersection signalization and channelization. CONST. $98 t TOTAL $115 $0 9 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS 87 -RW03 16 6 HIK 0.60 X P $61 $369 $430 $96 $344 P.E. Minkler Blvd. - Southcenter Mall Nest Access R/W Install traffic signals and pedestrian crossings. CONST. t TOTAL 10 10 10 TUKNILA PARKWAY @ ANDOVER PARK EAST SIGNAL 85 -RNO4 16 6 HIK 0.10 X P 121 $133 1154 126 $128 P.E. 119 Tukwila Pkwy @ Andover Park E. R/y Install traffic signal and channelization. CONST. $109 * TOTAL 119 1109 11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM 88 -RW02 16 6 I 10.00 P 199 $519 1618 $618 P.E. All traffic signals R/W Install signal interconnect system w /master controller. CONST. I TOTAL 10 $0 12 CHRISTENSEN ROAD 84 -RW44 19 3 ABDF 0.17 X P $235 $235 $235 P.E. T -Line Bridge - 900 feet south. R/W Construct street and trail improvements including cul- de -sacin conjunction with CONST. T -Line bridge replacement. 13 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY ISR 1811 84 -RW31 14 3 ABDF 0.42 X P 141 $492 1 -405 - Strander Blvd. Widen from 6 to 7 lanes with signal modifications @ 2 inter- sections. 14 LON6ACRES DRIVE IS. 158TH ST.1 84 -RN13 West Valley Highway - Nelsen Place 15 SOUTH 156TH STREET 87 -RW07 Nact Vnllov Ninhrw - Nolcon Plnrn 1533 $533 19 4 ABDF 0.10 X P 1231 $231 $231 19 1 ABDF 0.10 X P $292 1292 1292 * TOTAL TO $0 P.E. R/N CONST. t TOTAL $0 TO P.E. R/W CONST. t TOTAL 10 $0 P.E. SIX TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE CITY NO. 1320 ADOPTION DATE COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION ND. June 20, 1988 Page 3 F. U. PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS 11 FEDERAL P M C N. II DI R F A A D1 1 U JO R IS �! OBLIGATION PLAN 0 '' ? - NC OF R N. EXPENDITURE PLAN ;; R CL R Y 6. . SOURCE OF FUNDS .1 1 I TA W TOTAL 0 . FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES .. . 1 2ND T IS CO WORK V 5. . TOTAL . .. 1 1ST YR1 Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LNETH E 1. :: 1 : THRU N AK CODE R Al : 3RD & : 5TH & . 1. 1 ANNUAL: N A S T; 15T : 2ND 1 4TH : 6TH . 1 LOCAL :RAP/UAB:FEDERAL:: : 6TH 0 L S X U1 YEAR . YEAR 1 YEARS 1 YEARS . FUNDS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS 1. . ELENT.. S1 1 1 1 1 . .. 1 YEARS 16 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 84 -RW06 14 4 ABDF 1.36 X P $4,145 $4,145 $829 $3,316 P.E. R/N CONST. f TOTAL $0 $0 17 SOUTH 168TH STREET 84 -RN08 19 1 ABDF 0.38 X P $1,392 $1,859 $3,251 $3,251 P.E. Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park West R/N New 4 -lane street including r -o -w acquisition and new signalat Andover Park CONST. Nest. S. 139th St. - Southcenter Blvd. * TOTAL $0 $0 18 ANDOVER PARK EAST RR XIN6 87 -RW10 16 6 1K 0.10 X P $140 $140 $140 P.E. 111 400 feet south of Strander Blvd. R/W Signalize existing RR zing. CONST. $129 f TOTAL $0 $140 19 SOUTH 133RD STREET 86 -RW01 17 2 ABDF 0.28 X P $332 , $332. $332 P.E. 42nd Ave. 5. - Interurban Ave. R/W Widen to 4 or 5 lanes. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 20 SOUTH 134TH STREET 84 -RW27 19 2 ABDF 0.23 X P $226 $226 $226 P.E. 5. 133rd St. - 48th Ave. S. R/W Widen to 4 lanes. CONST. + TOTAL $0 $0 21 RAILROAD XIN6 RESURFACING 87 -RW14 16 5 ABD 0.04 X P $114 $98 $212 $212 P.E. All RR zings in CBD. R/W Surface improvements at grade of existing RR zings. CONST. y + TOTAL $0 $0 y 22 STRANDER BLVD @ ANDOVER PARK WEST SIGNAL 84 -RW23 17 6 HI 0.10 X P $88 $88 $18 $70 P.E. 11 Strander Blvd @ Andover Park N. R/W Left turn channelization and traffic signal modifications. CONST. f TOTAL $0 $0 23 ANDOVER PARK WEST 88 -RW04 17 2 ABDF 0.89 P $147 $1,768 $1,915 $383 '$1,532 P.E. SIX TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA , HEARING DATE CITY NO. 1320 ADOPTION DATE COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION NO. June 2U, 1Y86 Page 4 F1 U1 PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS P M C N1 R F A A 01 1 OBLIGATION PLAN }r U JD R I1 D ` '¢�,. - NC OF R N1 EXPENDITURE PLAN. R CL R Y 61 ! ! "; SOURCE OF FUNDS , I TA M TOTAL 0 1 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES 1 11 1 1 2ND 1 IS CO WORK V 51 I TOTAL 1 11 1 1ST YR1 Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF MORK OS LR LNSTH E T1 1 1 :: 1 : THRU N AK CODE R Al 1 : 3RD & : 5TH & 1 I I I 11 1 ANNUAL: N A S T1 1ST 1 2ND : 4TH : 6TH 1 1 LOCAL 1RAP /UABIFEDERAl11 1 1 6TH O L S 1 U1 YEAR : YEAR 1 YEARS 1 YEARS I FUNDS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS 11 1 ELEMT.1 FEDERAL S1 1 1 1 I I 11 1 1 YEARS 24 STRANDER BOULEVARD 88 -R103 17 2 ABDF 0.38 P $2,259 $2,259 $452 $1,807 P.E. Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park West R/N Widen to 7 lanes. CONST. + TOTAL $0 $0 25 TUKWILA PARKWAY 8 S -LINE BRIDGE 84 -RM39 16 1 ADF6 0.10 X P $227 $227 $227 P.E. Tukwila Parkway 8 S-Line Bridge R/W New access to Southcenter Mall at existing intersection. CONS1. f TOTAL $0 $0 26 WEST VALLEY HWY :SR 1811 a S. 180TH STREET 84 -RW40 14 2 HIKL 0.10 X P $242 $1,497 $1,739 $34B $1,391 P.E. W. Valley Hwy 8 S. 180th R/M Signal modification, channelization, bridge widening. CONST. f TOTAL ' $0 $0 27 ANDOVER PARK WEST RR XING 87 -RW13 17 6 IK 0.04 X P $148 $148 $148 P.E. $12 100 Feet north and south of proposed 5. 168th. R/W Signalize existing RR King. CONST. $136 f TOTAL $0 $148 28 ANDOVER PARK WEST RR XIN6 B7 -RWII 17 6 IK 0.04 X P $148 $148 $148 P.E. $12 100 feet north and south of Winkler Blvd. R/W Signalize existing RR zing. CONST. $136 * TOTAL 10 $148 29 MINKLER BLVD RR XIN6 87 -RM12 19 6 IK 0.04 X P $148 $148 $148 P.E. $12 100 feet east and west of existing King. R/W Signalize existing RR King. CONST. $136 + TOTAL $0. $148 30 INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH 84 -RW36 14 6 HI 0.15 X P 8159 $167 $326 $54 $272 P.E. $40 400 feet north and south of S. 133rd St. R/W Signalize an- and off -ramps (SR 599). CONST. $232 4 TOTAL $0 $272 31 SOUTH 180TH STREET 84 -RW21 16 3 HI 0.30 X P $9 $113 $122 $122 P.E. Southcenter Parkway - Andover Park Vest R/N Iaft and rinht turn rhannali,atinn endil:irnlinne ,........ SIX TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA HEARING DATE CITY NO. 1320 ' ADOPTION DATE COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION NO. June 20, 1988 Page 5 P R 0 R T Y N 0 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK F: 11 II U: PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS 1: FEDERAL M CN1 ;1 F A A O: :1 OBLIGATION PLAN U JO R I: : s. - NC OF R N: EXPENDITURE PLAN : :: CL R Y 61 : SOURCE OF FUNDS 1 TA W TOTAL 0 1 FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES 1 ;; IS CO WORK V S: 1 TOTAL 1 1: 1 1ST YRl OS LR LN6TH E T: l 1 11 l 1 THRU N AK CODE R Al 1 3RD & 1 5TH 1 1 1 : : 1: : ANNUALI A S T: 1ST 1 2ND 1 4TH 1 6TH 1 : LOCAL :RAP /UAB:FEDERAL:: 1 1 6TH L 5 X U: YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEARS 1 YEARS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS : FUNDS 1: 1 ELEMT.1 S: 1 11 1 :. YEARS 32 SOUTH 180TH STREET ! ANDOVER PARK NEST 84 -RW24 16 3 ABDF 0.10 X P $81 $81 $81 P.E. 300 feet north, south, west, and east from intersection R/W Intersection widening for signalization and channelization modifications. CONST. * TOTAL 10 $0 33 STRANDER BOULEVARD 84 -RN32 17 3 ABDF 0.38 X P $39 $461 $500 $500 P.E. Andover Park West - Lois T. Newton Bridge. R/W Widen from 4 to 5 lanes. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 34 STRANDER BLVD 8 SOUTHCENTER MALL ACCESS 87 -RW04 17 6 HIJK 0.20 X P $159 $159 $32 $127 P.E. . 500 feet east and west of intersection. R/N Signalization and channelization of existing access. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 35 ANDOVER PARK NEST 4 BAKER BLVD 87 -RW05 17 6 HI 0.10 X P $159 $159 $32 $127 P.E. 300 feet north, south, east, and west from intersection R/W Signalization and channelization of intersection. CONST. * TOTAL $0 10 36 SOUTH 180TH STREET E 72ND AVE. SOUTH 87 -RW19 14 6 HI 0.10 P $159 $159 $26 $133 P.E. $20 300 feet east, west, and south of intersection. R/N Signalization and channelization of intersection. CONST. $113 * TOTAL $0 $133 37 TUKWILA PARKWAY EXTENSION 84 -RWIB 16 1 ABDF 0.25 X P $9,773 $9,773 $1,955 $7,818 P.E. Andover Park East - W. Valley Hwy (SR 181). R/N New 5 -lane arterial w /bridge across Green River. CONST. • TOTAL $0 $0 38 GATEWAY DRIVE EXTENSION 85 -RWO1 17 1 ABDF 0.40 X P $2,836 $2,836 12,836 P.E. Gateway Drive - 50th Place S. R/W New 4 -lane arterial w /bridge crossing the Duwasish River. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 39 SOUTH 180TH STREET RR XIN6 87 -RW09 14 1 ADF6 0.20 X P $9,068. $9,068 $1,814 $7,254 P.E. S. 180th (SW 43rd) 5 UPRR -BNRR ring. R/W SIX `' TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1494 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA , CITY NO. 1320 COUNTY NO. 17 HEARING DATE ADOPTION DATE RESOLUTION NO. June 20, 1988 Page 6 FI U: PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS P M C N1 R F A A DI I �.s "'��; U JO R I: 0 t - NC OF R N. EXPENDITURE PLAN 1: , -, R �,� }y', #`'. Cl R Y 6: 1 .�R':. SOURCE OF FUNDS :{. � r� "a TA N TOTAL 0 I FOR ALL FUNDING TYPES i ; ; : MD I ::: T IS CO WORK V S: TOTAL 1 1: 1 1ST YRI Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK OS LR LN6TH E T: : :1 1 : THRU N AK CODE R Al I : 3RD & 1 5TH & 1 :: 1 ANNUAL: N A S 1: 1ST 1 2ND 1 4TH 1 6TH : : LOCAL :RAP /UAB:FEDERALI: 1 6TH 0 L 5 X U: YEAR : YEAR : YEARS 1 YEARS 1 FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS 1 FUNDS :1 1 ELEMT.: FEDERAL 1: OBLIGATION PLAN 11 11 SI 1 1 1 YEARS 40 MINKLER BLVD 84 -RW15 Andover Park W. - Andover Park E. Widen from 4 to 5 lanes. 19 3 ABDF 0.38 X P $764 $764 $764 P.E. R/N CONST. * TOTAL $0 10 41 SOUTH 144TH STREET 84 -RW29 19 4 ABDF 0.11 X P $179 $179 $179 P.E. Interurban Ave. - Dumamish River R/N Reconstruct to City standards. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 42 SOUTH 143RD STREET 84 -RW25 19 4 ABDF 0.20 X P $411 $411 $411 P.E. Interurban Ave. - Duwamish River R/W Reconstruct to city standards. CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 43 SOUTH 140TH STREET 84 -RW26 19 4 ABDF 0.11 X P $179 $179 $179 P.E. Interurban Ave. - Duwamish River R/11 Reconstruct to city standards CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 44 SOUTH 143RD PLACE 84 -RW28 19 4 ABDF 0.19 X P $249 $249 $249 P.E. Interurban Ave. - Duwamish River R/W Reconstruct to city standards CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 45 TRECK DRIVE EXTENSION 87 -RWO6 19 1 ABDF 0.11 X P $421 $421 $421 P.E. Andover Park West - exist. Treck Drive R/W New 4 -lane street CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 46 SOUTH 151ST STREET 87 -RW08 19 2 ABDF 0.10 X P $155 $155 $155 P.E. 51st Ave. S. - 52nd Ave. S. R/N Street and drainage improvements CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 47 NELSEN PLACE 88-RN05 19 2 ABDF 0.11 P $305 $305 $305 P.E. S. 156th St. - S. 158th St. R/W Num SIX ! 'RANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1989 TO 1994 CITY /COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA . HEARING DATE CITY NO. 1320 ' ADOPTION DATE COUNTY NO. 17 RESOLUTION N0. June 20, 1988 Page 7 F1 U: PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS P M C Nl R F A A D1 1 .--- U JO R i 1 l O 1;i# b.'', - NC OF R N1 EXPENDITURE PLAN ;; R ' ' ,, ' CL R Y 61 ' SOURCE OF FUNDS II �o4ri 11T'�• r• -, SS I : TA Y TOTAL 0 1 FOR ALL FUNDIN6 TYPES :1 1 2ND T IS CO WORK V 51 TOTAL 1 :: 1 1ST YR1 Y PROJECT IDENTIFICATION /DESCRIPTION OF WORK 05 LR LN6TH E T1 1 11 l : THRU N AK CODE R Al : 1 3RD 1 1 5TH 1 1 1 1 l: 1 ANNUALI N A S TI 1ST 1 2ND 1 4TH 1 6TH 1 LOCAL :RAP /UAB :FEDERAL :I I 1 6TH 0 L S X UI YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEARS 1 YEARS FUNDS 1 FUNDS : FUNDS 1 FUNDS :1 1 ELEMT.: 11 FEDERAL OBLI6ATION PLAN Sl 11 1 YEARS 48 58TH AVENUE SOUTH 84 -RW34 Strander Blvd - 5. 168th Street New 4-lane street with ner signal ! Strander Blvd. 49 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 84 -R$19 Minkler Blvd. - Southcenter Mall West Access Widen from 5 to 6 & 7 lanes 50 SOUTH 188TH CONNECTOR 84 -RWO5 S. 178th St. - S. 188th St. New 5 -lane arterial 51 SOUTH 168TH STREET 84 -RW35 Andover Park West - Andover Park East New 4 -lane street 52 BAKER BLVD. 84 -R1138 Andover Park West - Christensen Road Left turn channelization modifications 53 SOUTH 154TH STREET 84 -RW30 53rd Ave. S. - West City Limits Widen to 4 or 5 lanes 54 SOUTH 178TH STREET 88 -RW07 Southcenter Parkway - 1 -5 19 1 ABDF 0.26 X P 16 2 ABDF 0.59 X U 16 1 ABDF 0.66 X U 19 1 ABDF 0.17 X U 19 6 HK 0.17 X U 16 2 ABDF 0.20 X U 16 1 ABDF 0.46 X U 11,685 $1,685 $1,685 P.E. R/W CONST. • TOTAL $0 $0 $2,852 $2,852 $2,852 P.E. R/W CONST. f TOTAL $0 $0 $3,612 $3,612 $3,612 P.E. R/W CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 $366 $366 $366 P.E. R/W CONST. • TOTAL $0 10 $105 $105 $105 P.E. R/W CONST. t TOTAL $0 $0 $357 $357 $357 P.E. R/N CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 $3,191 $3,191 $638 $2,553 P.E. R/N CONST. * TOTAL $0 $0 7 //d anKr a CITY OF TUKWILA :1/4 k ‘... MR T/P PfarEcrs (HS f -• /Tem)